alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief financial officer of Simmons Company (the "Company"), does hereby certify
that to the undersigned's knowledge:

     1) the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
        29, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) the information contained in the Company's quarterly report on Form
        10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2003 fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.


                                    -------------------
                                    William S. Creekmuir
                                    Chief Financial Officer


Dated: May __, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simmons Company and will be retained by Simmons Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                       JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                 9,303,481
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                          3,891,869
<ALLOWANCES>                             213,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      15,148,723
<PP&E>                                 1,395,512
<DEPRECIATION>                           190,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        19,077,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  2,901,607
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      41
<OTHER-SE>                            15,659,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          19,077,999
<SALES>                               12,254,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      12,254,066
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         14,376,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          27,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          81,664
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       156,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (2,651,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                             28,061
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                         (2,679,380)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Doris Lumpkin, Appellant, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

Submitted December 17, 2007;

decided February 12, 2008

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals does not lie from the order of an individual Justice of the Appellate Division *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3; CPLR 5602). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19130]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2017-N-0809]


Issuance of Priority Review Voucher; Rare Pediatric Disease 
Product

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
issuance of a priority review voucher to the sponsor of a rare 
pediatric disease product application. The Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), as amended by the Food and Drug 
Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), authorizes FDA to 
award priority review vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric 
disease product applications that meet certain criteria. FDA is 
required to publish notice of the award of the priority review voucher. 
FDA has determined that KYMRIAH (tisagenlecleucel), manufactured by 
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, meets the criteria for a priority 
review voucher.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gretchen Opper, Center for Biologics 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the issuance of a priority 
review voucher to the sponsor of an approved rare pediatric disease 
product application. Under section 529 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 
360ff), which was added by FDASIA, FDA will award priority review 
vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric disease product 
applications that meet certain criteria. FDA has determined that 
KYMRIAH (tisagenlecleucel), manufactured by Novartis Pharmaceuticals 
Corporation, meets the criteria for a priority review voucher. KYMRIAH 
(tisagenlecleucel) is indicated for the treatment of patients up to 25 
years of age with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) 
that is refractory or in second or later relapse.
    For further information about the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority 
Review Voucher Program and for a link to the full text of section 529 
of the FD&C Act, go tohttps://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DevelopingProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/RarePediatricDiseasePriorityVoucherProgram/default.htm. For further 
information about KYMRIAH (tisagenlecleucel), go to the Center for 
Biologics Evaluation and Research cellular and gene therapy products 
Web site at https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/CellularGeneTherapyProducts/ApprovedProducts/default.htm.

    Dated: September 5, 2017.
Anna K. Abram,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017-19130 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 10, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50904

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDVIN AROLDO JUAREZ-CAMPOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-47-1-AML

--------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edvin Aroldo Juarez-Campos appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into

the United States following deportation. Juarez-Campos was

sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 46 months to be followed by

three years of supervised release.

Juarez-Campos argues for the first time on appeal that, in

light of United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), the

district court plainly erred in sentencing him under a mandatory
2

guidelines system based upon facts that were not admitted by him or

found by a jury. He contends that mitigating circumstances brought

to the district court’s attention at sentencing would have led to

a lesser sentence if the district court had sentenced him under an

advisory guideline scheme. 

Juarez-Campos’s claim that the district court plainly erred by

enhancing his sentence based upon facts not determined by a jury

and which he did not admit is unavailing because he failed to show

that “the sentencing judge--sentencing under an advisory scheme

rather then a mandatory one--would have reached a significantly

different result.” See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520-

522 (5th Cir.), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005)

(No. 04-9517); see also United States v. Bringier, 405 F.3d 310,

317 (5th Cir. 2005). His argument that the district court’s

application of the guidelines as mandatory was error also fails

because he did not show that the district court would have imposed

a different sentence had the guidelines been advisory only. See

United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 733-34 (5th Cir.

2005). 

Juarez-Campos concedes that the issue whether his sentence

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was rendered unconstitutional by

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and subsequent Supreme

Court precedent is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), and he raises it solely to

preserve it for further review by the Supreme Court. Apprendi did
3

not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90;

United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). We

therefore must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the

Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d

at 984 (internal quotations and citation omitted). 

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Heriberto GONZALEZ-SINSOON, also known as Miguel Garcia-Mendez, also known as Heriberto Bautista-Sosa, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-51070

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 8, 2008.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western *693District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Heriberto Gonzalez-Sinsoon (Gonzalez) appeals the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of being illegally present in the United States following removal. He argues that the district court erred in applying a 16-level crime-of-violence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) based on his North Carolina conviction for breaking or entering.

In determining whether an offense is an enumerated crime of violence under the Guidelines, we are not bound by the label given to the conviction by the state. *United States v. Fierro-Reyna,*466 F.3d 324, 327 (5th Cir.2006). The North Carolina statute under which Gonzalez was convicted applies where “[a]ny person ... breaks or enters any building with intent to commit any felony or larceny therein.” N.C. Gen Stat. § 14-54(a). This statutory definition may be narrowed by the allegation of the indictment to which Gonzalez pleaded guilty. *See United States v. Carbajal-Diaz,*508 F.3d 804, 807-08 (5th Cir.2007). The indictment, which is of record, specifies that Gonzalez’s breaking or entering offense involved a building used as a residence. Because Gonzalez’s breaking or entering offense, as narrowed by the indictment, satisfies the definition of the enumerated offense of burglary of a dwelling the district court did not err in applying the enhancement. *See id.*at 810-12; *United States v. Ortega-Gonzaga,*490 F.3d 393, 395 (5th Cir.2007).

In light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Gonzalez also challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. This court has held that this issue is “fully foreclosed from further debate.” *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *petition for cert. filed*(Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

COMMUNITY CENTRAL BANK CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q (continued)

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                             Rule 1350 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Community Central
Bank Corporation (the "Corporation") that the Quarterly Report of the
Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial
statements included in such report.


Dated: November 13, 2007                By: S/ DAVID A. WIDLAK
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Widlak;
                                            President and CEO
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: November 13, 2007                By: S/ RAY T. COLONIUS
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ray T. Colonius;
                                            Treasurer
                                            (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                            Officer)


                                       38
#### Penn Heights Beach Club, Inc., Appellant, v Nancy Myers et al., Respondents.

Submitted December 17, 2007;

decided February 14, 2008

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Guardian International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kenneth Wiesenfeld, Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Kenneth Wiesenfeld
-----------------------
Kenneth Wiesenfeld
Vice President of Finance
November 13, 2002





The foregoing certificate is provided solely for purposes of complying with
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose
whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any
of the Company's previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate
the Company's future filings, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in
whole or in part, this certificate shall not be incorporated by reference into
any such filings.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2013-CCRE9 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information requiredto be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities requiredto be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been includedas an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to meby the following unaffiliated parties:

 

KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.),as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer, as Special Servicer of the Northridge Mall Mortgage Loan, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee prior to October 17, 2022,U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee on and after October 17, 2022, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor.

 

 

 

Dated:March 17, 2023

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

Helaine M. Kaplan

President

(senior officer in charge of securitizationof the depositor)
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 39 

Relating to the disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the 

Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of M1A1/A2 Abrams Tank 

structures and other major defense equipment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. LEE, and Mr. FRANKEN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the proposed foreign military 

sale to the Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 

of M1A1/A2 Abrams Tank structures and other major 

defense equipment. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of a letter of offer with respect to any 

4 of the following proposed sales to the Government of the 

5 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (described in the certification 

6 Transmittal No. 16–32, sent to the Speaker of the House 

7 of Representatives and the chairman of the Committee on 

8 Foreign Relations of the Senate pursuant to section 


ebenthall on DSK30MX082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 39 IS 

1 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

2 2776(b)(1))) on August 8, 2016, is hereby prohibited: 

3 (1) The proposed sale of one hundred fifty4 three (153) M1A1/A2 Abrams Tank structures for 

5 conversion to one hundred thirty-three (133) M1A2S 

6 Saudi Abrams configured Main Battle Tanks and 

7 twenty (20) battle damage replacements for the ex8 isting fleet (Transmittal Numbered 16–32). 

9 (2) The proposed sale of one hundred fifty10 three (153) M2 .50 Caliber Machine Guns (Trans11 mittal Numbered 16–32). 

12 (3) The proposed sale of two hundred sixty-six 

13 (266) 7.62mm M240 Machine Guns (Transmittal 

14 Numbered 16–32). 

15 (4) The proposed sale of one hundred fifty16 three (153) M250 Smoke Grenade Launchers 

17 (Transmittal Numbered 16–32). 

18 (5) The proposed sale of twenty (20) M88A1/ 

19 A2 Heavy Equipment Recovery Combat Utility Lift 

20 Evacuation System (HERCULES) Armored Recov21 ery Vehicle (ARV) Structures for conversion to 

22 twenty (20) M88A1/A2 HERCULES ARVs (Trans23 mittal Numbered 16–32). 


ebenthall on DSK30MX082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SJ 39 IS 

1 (6) The proposed sale of one hundred sixty-nine 

2 (169) AN/VAS–5 Driver Vision Enhancer–Abrams 

3 (DVE–A) (Transmittal Numbered 16–32). 

4 (7) The proposed sale of one hundred thirty5 three (133) AN/PVS–7B Night Vision Devices 

6 (Transmittal Numbered 16–32). 

7 (8) The proposed sale of four thousand two 

8 hundred fifty-six (4,256) Rounds M865 Training 

9 Ammunition (Transmittal Numbered 16–32). 

10 (9) The proposed sale of two thousand three 

11 hundred ninety-four (2,394) Rounds M831A1 Train12 ing Ammunition (Transmittal Numbered 16–32). 

Æ 


ebenthall on DSK30MX082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000887022
<NAME> EVE HOLDINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               4
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     4
<PP&E>                                               2
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,391
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,016)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       574
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,724
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                       939
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,895
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,895
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>