alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document


     Exhibit
10.18 

     Description
of Oral Amendment of Purchase Agreement 

    


    Purchase
Agreement : 

    


     Party
A: Meihekou City Hengyide Warehouse Logistics Co., Ltd. 

    


     Party
B: Ganzhi Ginseng Products Co Ltd & China Ginseng Holding
Inc 

    


     As per
negotiation between Party A and B in relation to the premise located in the
address of a PRC company named in Tonghua Diyuan Grape Wine Co., Ltd., it is
agreed as follow: 

    


     1)
Party A and B shall go to the PRC auction company Jilin Mingshi Auction Co. Ltd.
(“Jinlin Mingshi”) together to apply for the change of the purchaser’s name from
Party A to Party B. The application fee is borne by Party B. 

    


     2) All
details/content of the location, land area and facilities that to be acquired
originally by Party A from Jinlin Minshi remain unchanged. The consideration of
RMB 9,000,000 and the agency commission that to be originally paid by Party A
are remain unchanged and shall be paid by Party B to Party A. 

    


     3)
Payment method: This agreement is become effective upon date of signing, Party B
shall pay Party A of RMB 500,000 before 20 March 2010, the remaining balance
shall be repaid in full before end of June 2010. 

    


     4) The
consideration of RMB 9,000,000 is calculated with the bank’s lending rate, and
shall be paid by Party B to Party A. 

    


     5)
Party A is agreed to waive the rental expenses incurred by Party B for using the
premise for the period from Jan to Feb 2010. 

    


     6) If
the remaining balance is not settled within June 2010, Party A has the right to
repossess the premise and confiscate the deposit paid to Party A. And Party B is
liable to compensate Party A for an amount equivalent to 6 month’s rental
expenses for using the premise. 

    


     7)
Both parties shall obey the terms set out in this agreement. This agreement
comes into force promptly after the representatives of both parties sign and put
on the seal. 

    


     8)
This agreement is made in 2 copies, both parties hold one. 

    


     Meihekou
Hengyide Warehouse Logistics Co., Ltd. (with company seal) 

     Legal
Representative: (signature) 

    


     Jilin
Ganzhi Ginseng Products Co., Ltd (with company seal) 

     Legal
Representative: Zhang Yuxiang 

    


     China
Ginseng Holdings Inc. (with company seal) 

     Legal
Representative: Liu Changzhen 

    


     Oral
Amendment: 

    


      Meihekou and China
Ginseng entered into a purchase agreement of certain production
factory  for total consideration of 9,000,000 RMB dated March 2,
2010.  China Ginseng paid 500,000 RMB (about USD $75,207 ) on June 24,
2010;  obtained an 8 million RM(about USD $1,203,312 ) bank loan to
pay Meihekou  on November 8, 2010; and paid 100,000 RMB (about USD
$15,041) in December, 2010. The remaining balance 400,000 RMB (about USD $60,167
) should be paid off by end of June 2010 pursuant to the purchase agreement,
however, Meihekou oranlly agreed to  extend the due date of the
remaining 400,000RMB (about USD $60,167)  to December 31, 2011.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2329 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to provide for certain requirements for financial institutions that are creditors for obligations and 

liabilities covered by that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2011 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio (for himself, Mr. BASS of New Hampshire, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. UPTON, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. COBLE, Mr. PITTS, Mrs. 

SCHMIDT, and Mr. BROOKS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to provide 

for certain requirements for financial institutions that 

are creditors for obligations and liabilities covered by 

that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring a Response 

5 for Servicemembers Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2329 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR LENDING INSTITUTIONS THAT 

2 ARE CREDITORS FOR OBLIGATIONS AND LI3 ABILITIES COVERED BY THE 

4 SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT. 

5 Section 207 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as 

8 subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and 

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol10 lowing new subsection (d): 

11 ‘‘(d) LENDING INSTITUTION REQUIREMENTS.— 

12 ‘‘(1) COMPLIANCE OFFICERS.—Each lending in13 stitution subject to the requirements of this section 

14 shall designate an employee of the institution as a 

15 compliance officer who is responsible for ensuring 

16 the institution’s compliance with this section and for 

17 distributing information to servicemembers whose 

18 obligations and liabilities are covered by this section. 

19 ‘‘(2) TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER.—Dur20 ing any fiscal year, a lending institution subject to 

21 the requirements of this section that had annual as22 sets for the preceding fiscal year of $10,000,000,000 

23 or more shall maintain a toll-free telephone number 

24 and shall make such telephone number available on 

25 the primary Internet Web site of the institution.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RM01-5-000]

                    Take notice that the Commission's electronic tariff system (eTariff) does not reproduce footnotes, headers, or footers in the Real-Text-Format (RTF) tariff text posted on the Commission's Web site (                    *http://etariff.ferc.gov/​TariffList.aspx*                    ).[1]                                          To the extent footnotes, headers or footers are needed in tariff text, filers should enter them separately in the body of the document on each page where needed rather than by using automatic features of the word processing program.                

Dated: September 6, 2017.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             This applies to footnotes created programmatically by the word processing software, such as the Insert Footnote Tool in Microsoft Word, and text added to the header or footer areas of a document, such as using the Insert Header or Footer Tool in Microsoft Word or clicking in the header or footer areas of the document.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2017-19563 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Richard K. Crump, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Sterling
Chemicals, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report of the Company for the period ending
June 30, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 8, 2005

                             /s/ RICHARD K. CRUMP
                             -------------------------------------
                             Richard K. Crump,
                             President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 

 

I, Glen Var Rosenbaum, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed thisForm 10-K of Corvus Technologies Corp.

 

2.   Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.   The registrant's othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure ontrols and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)   Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)   Designed such internalcontrol over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c)   Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and

 

d)   Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant'sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)   All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)   Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.
Exhibit 32(b)

CFO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that the accompanying Form 10-QSB of CN Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company


/s/ Michael T. Storm

Michael T. Storm
Chief Financial Officer
May 5, 2004





                                       21
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.2
                              THINK NEW IDEAS, INC.
                        8000 Sunset Blvd., Penthouse East
                          Los Angeles, California 90046

                                October 23, 1997

Ms. Susan Goodman
Executive Vice President
THINK New Ideas, Inc.
45 West 36th Street, 12th Floor
New York, New York 10018

      Re:   AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 30, 1996

Dear Susan:

      Reference is hereby made to that certain employment  agreement dated as of
June 30, 1996 (the "Employment  Agreement")  between THINK New Ideas,  Inc. (the
"Corporation")  and Susan Goodman (the  "Employee").  This letter is intended to
confirm  that,  notwithstanding  anything  else to the contrary set forth in the
Employment Agreement, the Corporation and the Employee hereby agree that Section
4(a) of the Employment  Agreement be hereby amended by striking  Section 4(a) of
the  Employment  Agreement  thereof  and by  substituting  in lieu  thereof  the
following new Section 4(a) to read as follows:

      "4(a) COMPENSATION.  The Company shall pay the Employee compensation equal
to Two  Hundred  Fifteen  Thousand  Dollars  ($215,000)  per  annum at a rate of
Seventeen   Thousand  Nine  Hundred  Sixteen   Dollars  and  Sixty-Seven   Cents
($17,916.67)  per month (such monthly  amount as the same may be increased  from
time to time by virtue of the adjustments set forth hereinbelow shall be defined
as the "Monthly Compensation").  Such salary shall be payable in accordance with
the customary payroll practices of the Company."

      The modification  stated herein shall become effective on January 2, 1998.
Except as otherwise  expressly  modified  hereby or required to  effectuate  the
modification set forth herein,  the Employment  Agreement shall remain unchanged
and shall continue in full force and effect pursuant to the terms thereof.

      This  letter  agreement   contains  the  entire   agreement   between  the
Corporation  and the  Employee  with  respect to the  modification  which is the
subject hereof. This letter agreement may not be amended, changed,  modified, or
discharges,  nor may any provision hereof be waived,  except by an instrument in
writing  executed by or on behalf of the party against whom  enforcement  of any
amendment,  waiver,  change,  modification or discharge is sought.  No course of
conduct or dealing shall be construed to modify,  amend or otherwise  affect any
of the provisions hereof.  Please confirm that the Employee is in agreement with
the forgoing, and that the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding by
signing and returning this letter,  which shall  thereupon  constitute a binding
agreement.

Agreed to and accepted as of this
14 day of May, 1998                             Very truly yours,
                                                THINK New Ideas, Inc.


By: /s/ Susan Goodman                           By: /s/ Scott Mednick
    -----------------                               -----------------
      Susan Goodman                                  Scott Mednick
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50410

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN PAT MAXWELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-99-CV-107 (W-91-CR-55-2)

--------------------

December 8, 1999

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Maxwell, Texas inmate # 56084-080, pleaded guilty to

and was convicted of one count of possession of amphetamine with

intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and

one count of carrying a firearm during the commission of a

felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). He seeks a

certificate of appeal (COA) from the dismissal of his petition

for habeas relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 
No. 99-50410

-2-

Because the district court ruled on the merits of Maxwell’s

§ 2241 petition, Maxwell’s motion for a COA is DENIED as 

unnecessary. Ojo v. INS, 106 F.3d 680, 681 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Maxwell’s argument that he cannot be convicted of “using” or

“carrying” a firearm under Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137

(1995), is refuted by the factual basis for his guilty plea which

indicates that Maxwell carried a rifle while he was in possession

of amphetamine. United States v. Hall, 110 F.3d 1155, 1161 (5th

Cir. 1997). The district court’s denial of Maxwell’s § 2241

petition is AFFIRMED.
(logo) **Rialto**

          CAPITAL

 

 

2015 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of  July 1, 2013  by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-LC12, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-LC12 **(WFCM 2013-LC12)**

 

 

1. The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

2. All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

3. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

| Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

  | Date: March 1, 2016 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00774-CV

Ray BASALDUA,

Appellant

v.

George FARINACCI, LaDona Farinacci and Jim House,

Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-05926

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellees, George Farinacci, LaDona Farinacci, and Jim 

House, recover their costs of this appeal from appellee, Ray Basaldua.

SIGNED September 2, 2015.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
ex1026to1012g07663_02072011.htm


Exhibit 10.26


 


AMENDMENT NO. 12 to TRADEMARK LICENSE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR WOMEN’S COLLECTIONS


 


This amendment N 12, dated as of July 29th , 2009, is to Trademark License and Technical Assistance Agreement, dated March 4, 1998 , by and between Latitude Licensing Corp. (“Licensor”) and IC ISAACS & Company L.P. (“Licensee”) and its further amendments up to Amendment N 11. Capitalized terms used herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement unless otherwise Indicated.


 


The Parties herewith confirm that Licensee is exclusively running a Men’s collection activity, and that both Parties agree that the Agreement is suspended in all its terms as specified in Amendment 11.


 


Nevertheless, the Parties shall meet regularly in order to review possibilities to reactivate the Agreement together, and Licensor agrees that Licensee shall have a preferential right for 5 years (five) to propose a business plan to reactivate the Agreement and its original terms and conditions.


 


Licensor shall Inform Licensee in the case another company proposes a business plan of such License, so that Licensee can activate its preferential right, but without limiting Its right of negotiation in good faith.


 


In all case the highest interest to be considered shall be the Licensor’s interest and the Brand image and development.


 


1- Effective date


 


This Amendment is effective as of the date first written above


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, by their duly authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment 12 as of the dates Indicated below.


 



	
LATITUDE LICENSING CORP.

	  	
I.C. ISAACS & COMPANY L.P.


	  	  	  
	
By:

	
/s/ Serge Massat

	  	
By:

	
/s/ Robert S. Stec


	  	  	  	  	  
	
Name:

	
S. Massat

	  	
Name:

	
Robert S. Stec


	  	  	  	  	  
	
Title:

	
Secretary

	  	
Title:

	
CEO


	  	  	  	  	  
	
Date:

	
7/29/09

	  	
Date:

	
7/29/09
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
HARRY C. WALTERS, DOC # S37472, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-163 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed August 29, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge. Harry C. Walters, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Order entered August 7, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00396
- CV
LISA BEARD , ET AL. , Appellant s V. SHERRY ANDERSON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1 Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. 86969CC 

### O RDER Before the Court is the August 5, 2014 motion of Scott Smith, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 1 of Kaufman County, Texas, requesting this Court’s assistance in securing payment from appellee’s counsel for a copy of the reporter’s record. It is the appellant’s responsibility to request and pay for the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(b)(2) & (3). The reporter’s record has been filed and Scott Smith admits in his motion that appellants paid for the rep orter’s record. Appellee is entitled to obtain a copy of the record from this Court without paying a fee. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 12.4. Accordingly, we DENY the motion.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE