alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
13.1



CERTIFICATION



The certification
set forth below is being submitted in connection with Biotie Therapies Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code.



Timo Veromaa,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Biotie Therapies Corp., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with
                                         the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in
                                         the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                                         of operations of Biotie Therapies Corp.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March
22, 2016



|By: | /s/ Timo Veromaa                             
|--- | ---------------------------------------------
|    | Name:	Timo Veromaa                           
|    | Title:	President and Chief Executive 	Officer
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-196344, 333-211893, 333-211894, 333-214571 and 333-218542 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statements No. 333-211374, 333-211375, 333-217255 and 333-221089 on Form S-3 of Resonant Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2018 relating to the consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Crowe Horwath LLP


Sherman Oaks, California February 27, 2018
Unassociated Document


 



Promissory Note







For good value, Changchun Decens Foods Co., Ltd. promises to pay to the order of Yakun Song on demand the sum of RMB 15,000,000.


 




	 	Changchun Decens Foods Co., Ltd. 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 
Dated: December 10th, 2007



	
By: 

	/s/ Yakun Song 	 
	 	 	Yakun Song 	 
	 	 	
Chief Executive Officer
#### Graciela GOMEZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76431.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*998Submitted Dec. 3, 2007 *.

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Graciela Gomez, Inglewood, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Kurt B. Larson, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Graciela Gomez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal based on petitioner’s failure to establish the requisite exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying United States citizen relative, namely, petitioner’s son Juan. Petitioner contends that her due process rights were violated: when the IJ failed to admit the testimony of a psychologist concerning the effect on Juan of petitioner’s removal; when the IJ and BIA failed to follow the case law in denying her cancellation application; and when the IJ failed to consider the factors of petitioner’s continuous residence and good moral character.

Petitioner fails to state a colorable due process claim. Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, in making its hardship determination, the IJ did indeed consider the psychologist’s report, and concluded that even in its “best light” the report did not establish the requisite level of hardship. A difference of opinion as to the weight a piece of evidence should be given is not a colorable due process claim. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir., 2005). A disagreement with the BIA’s application of the legal standards to the facts of petitioner’s case is not a color-able due process claim. *See id.*Finally, there is no requirement that the agency analyze non-dispositive matters. *See INS v. Bagamasbad,*429 U.S. 24, 25, 97 S.Ct. 200, 50 L.Ed.2d 190 (1976) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                                |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  February 10, 2011 | /s/ Henry E. Gemino                                 |
|                               | Henry E. Gemino                                     |
|                               | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4240

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus HERBERT LEWIS TURNER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:01-cr-30062-sgw) Submitted: November 6, 2007 Decided: August 13, 2008 Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Craig W. Sampson, BARNES & DIEHL, PC, Chesterfield, Virginia, for Appellant. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* The envelope in which the notice was mailed was postmarked February 20, 2007. Un der the “mailbox rule” of Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988), a document is deemed filed by a prisoner when it is delivered to prison officials for mailing. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Herbert Lewis Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to eighteen months’ imprisonment. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court entered judgment on January 18, 2007. Turner filed the notice of appeal on February 20, 2007, *after the ten-day appeal period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Because the notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting the court to determine whether Turner has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. REMANDED
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J ES US M ARTINEZ- GO NZALEZ , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 30203 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 1 0 9 - W FN ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on W m . F r e m m i ng N i e l s e n, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B e f o r e : F A R R I S , L E A V Y , an dB Y B E E , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . Je sus M art i nez- G on za l ez appeal s f rom the 48 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for bei ng an al i en i n the U ni t ed S t at es af t er d e p o rt a t i o n , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 2 6 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f

f i rm. 

# FI LED MA R 14 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 30203 2 M a rtin e z - G o n z a le z a r g u e s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s ub s tan tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le gi ve n the na tur e of

the of f e ns e , hi s m ot i va t i on f

orr e e nt e r i ng the U ni t e d S t a t e s , and hi s l i m i t e d a nd s t a l e c r i m i na l hi s t ory . H e f urthe rc ont e nds tha tthe 16- l e ve l pr i or co n v i ct i o n sen t en ci n g en h an cem en tu n d er U . S . S . G . § 2 L 1 . 2 (b )(1 )(A ) i s p er se u n reaso n ab l e an dresu l t edi n a sen t en ce th atw as g reat er th an n ecessary. M a rtin e z - G o n z a le z ’s a r g u m e n t th a t th e 1 6 - le v e l s e n te n c in g e n h an c e m e n t is p e rs e u n r e a s o n ab le f

a ils . See U

ni ted States v. A m ez cua-V asqu ez , 567 F . 3d 1050, 1 0 5 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ; s e e al s o U ni te d States v . B ars umy an , 517 F . 3d 1154, 1159 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( pol i c y - ba s e d a r gum e nta ga i ns tthe G ui de l i ne s m us tbe a s s e rt e d on th e g r o u n dth a t its o p e r a tio n in ap artic u larc a s e r e s u lts in as e n te n c e th a t is u n r e a s o n ab le u n d e r1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) ) . I n l i ghtof

the t ot a l i tyof

the c i r c um s t anc e s a nd the § 3553( a ) f a c t or s , the b e lo w - G u id e lin e s s e n te n c e in th is c a s e is n o t s ub s tan tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le . Se e G a ll v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7). AF F I RME D.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAISY T. MORALES and JOSE A. MORALES,

Appellants,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-2174

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Roger B. Colton, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2010-CA015595XXXXMB-AW.

Thomas Erskine Ice of Ice Appellate, Royal Palm Beach, for appellants.

David A. Greene and W Mason of Fox Rothschild LLP, West Palm Beach, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2476 

To amend section 156 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 

(42 U.S.C. 1962d–5f) to require the Secretary of the Army to evaluate 

the feasibility of continuing Federal participation in a beach nourishment 

project, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2011 

Mr. MCINTYRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend section 156 of the Water Resources Development 

Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–5f) to require the Secretary of the Army to evaluate the feasibility of continuing Federal participation in a beach nourishment 

project, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bringing Economic 

5 Advancement and Coastal Health Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2476 IH

1 SEC. 2. BEACH NOURISHMENT. 

2 Section 156 of the Water Resources Development Act 

3 of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–5f) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘The’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) The’’; 

5 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 

6 following: ‘‘or after the date of the last estimated 

7 periodic nourishment as contemplated in the Chief’s 

8 Report, whichever is later’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(b) Before the end of the fifty-year period referred 

11 to in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army, acting 

12 through the Chief of Engineers, shall, subject to the avail13 ability of appropriations therefor, undertake a review of 

14 a project to which subsection (a) applies to evaluate the 

15 feasibility of continuing Federal participation in the 

16 project and shall make a recommendation to the Con17 gress.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001014488
<NAME> SAXTON INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,290<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       403
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         121,076
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,813
<SALES>                                         27,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,797
<CGS>                                           23,968
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,403<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,599
<INCOME-TAX>                                       798
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,801
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,801
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are comprised of "Due From Tax Credit Partnerships," "Construction
Contracts Receivable," "Notes Receivable," and "Due From Related Parties."
<F2>Other expenses are comprised of "General and Administrative," "Depreciation and
Amortization" expenses and "Joint Venture Losses."
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                           5,335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,508
<INVENTORY>                                     20,746
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,351
<PP&E>                                          47,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 375,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,794
<BONDS>                                        189,971
<COMMON>                                           320
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,809
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   375,805
<SALES>                                        258,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               258,142
<CGS>                                          153,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  153,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,479)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,172)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,307)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,307)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Advancing Translational 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; CTSA Collaborative Innovation Award 
Review.
    Date: November 7-8, 2017.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, Room 
1068, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: M. Lourdes Ponce, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing 
Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Democracy Blvd., Democracy 1, Room 1073 Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
0810, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85e9eaf0f7e1e0f6abf5eaebe6e0c5ebecedabe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cba7a4beb9afaeb8e5bba4a5a8ae8ba5a2a3e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, 
Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, 
B--Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research 
Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 7, 2017.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-19362 Filed 9-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.7

Amendment to Consulting Agreement Between Cleartronic and Larry M. Reid




Reference is made to the Consulting Agreement dated October 1, 2008 between Cleartronic, Inc.  (the "Company") and Larry M. Reid ("Reid").

Reid currently serves as President, CEO and CFO with the following compensation:

·

Monthly consulting fee of $8,000 per month. 

The agreement is amended as of June 1, 2011 and both parties agree as follows:

·

Reid will relinquish his position as President and CEO, retain the position of CFO and remain a member of the Board of Directors.

·

Monthly consulting fee will now be $9,000 and $3,000 per month accruing in shares or warrants at Reid's discretion through May 31, 2012. The exercise or conversion price of the shares or warrants shall be the average VWAP of the stock for the 30 days prior to the grant date. The “VWAP” shall be defined as the daily Volume Weighted Average Price (“VWAP”), as reported on Bloomberg.

·

The company will reimburse Reid for health insurance premium costs, expected to be approximately $2,000 per quarter.

·

1 year total of all the above is $152,000.

·

The Consulting Agreement and this Amendment may be assigned to a third party.

·

If Reid quits for any reason other than for “good reason" as defined below, during the 12 months, he keeps the current month’s fees and pro-rated portion of health insurance premiums, and forfeits the rest of the money.

·

If Reid is terminated without cause, or quits for “good reason” during the 12 months, then the balance of the $152,000 is due to him when he leaves.

o

Good reason is defined in his employment contract as loss of title or being essentially demoted.




Agreed to and Accepted    /s/ Dana Waldman                         7/8/11                                   


Dana Waldman, CEO                Date




Agreed to and Accepted   /s/ Larry M. Reid       7/8/11


                                          

Larry Reid            Date