alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15274 and #15275; Texas Disaster Number TX-
00487]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Texas

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 4.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-4332-DR), dated August 25, 
2017.

DATES: Issued on 09/04/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/24/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/25/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Texas, dated 08/25/2017, is hereby amended 
to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:
    Incident: Hurricane Harvey.
    Incident Period: 08/23/2017 and continuing.

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Austin, 
Bastrop, Dewitt, Gonzales, Karnes, Lavaca, Lee
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Texas: Atascosa, Burleson, Guadalupe, Milam, Travis, Williamson, 
Wilson

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-19125 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NO. 07-04-0537-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

FEBRUARY 2, 2005

______________________________

MICHAEL DEARDORFF, KATHY DEARDORFF AND BETTY J. DEARDORFF,

Appellants

V.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY;

NO. C3764; HON. LARRY D. SPROWLS, PRESIDING

_______________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

_______________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

Appellants Michael Deardorff, Kathy Deardorff and Betty J. Deardorff (the

Deardorffs) filed a notice of appeal on November 9, 2004. To date, no clerk’s or reporter’s

records have been received. On January 13, 2005, this court, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P.

35.3(a) and (b), notified the clerk and court reporter that the record was due to be filed no

later than December 27, 2004. In response, the clerk and reporter filed a request for

extension of time to file the record, stating that “appellant has not paid or made
2

arrangements to pay for the record.” On January 19, 2005, the Deardorffs were directed

by letter to provide this court with proof that they either paid for the record or made

satisfactory arrangements for payment of the record on or before January 29, 2005. So too

were they told that the failure to comply with the court’s directive would result in dismissal.

The deadline lapsed, and the court simply received, from the Deardorffs, a copy of a letter

to the court clerk directing her to forward various documents to this court. Nothing was said

about arrangements having been made regarding payment for the record, despite our

directive. Moreover, we received nothing from the Deardorffs illustrating that payment for

the reporter’s record has been made to or arrangements for its payment have been made

with the court reporter. 

Because the Deardorffs failed to comply with our January 19th directive, we dismiss

the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b) and (c). 

 

Per Curiam
EX-35.22
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884-2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
270 Park Avenue,
New York, NY 10017


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator (in such capacities, "Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies
as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "reporting
period"):

(c) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its
    performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A
    hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision;
    and

(d) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled
    all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
    respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.


March 7, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
Brian Smith
Vice President


(page)


To: J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1. Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013, by and among J.P.
   MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP, as Depositor, MIDLAND LOAN
   SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer
   and Special Servicer, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor
   and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent,
   Trustee and Custodian relating to the Series JPMBB 2013-C14 Commercial
   Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates relating to The South ridge Mall Whole
   Loan, a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series JPMC 2013-C12
   Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.


(page)


To: J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule B

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

Not Applicable
Unassociated Document


 


Exhibit 10.9




 


THIS NOTE IS DATED EFFECTIVE AS OF SEPTEMBER 7, 2011







RICHFIELD OIL & GAS COMPANY



	
$89,500.00

	
Promissory Note

	  










RICHFIELD OIL & GAS COMPANY, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), for value received, hereby promises to pay to MACKOV INVESTMENTS LIMITED ("Holder" or "Investor") or order, the amount of Eighty Nine Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($89,500), which includes $9,200.46 in loan fees as follows:








	
August 22, 2011

	
Loan equal to $45,000.00

	
Fee equal to $4,500.00


	
August 27, 2011

	
Loan equal to $25,582.50

	
Fee equal to $3,417.50


	
September 8, 2011

	
Loan equal to $9,717.04

	
Fee equal to $1,282.96












This Note shall mature and become due and payable on September 29, 2011 (the “Due Date”).  If the principal amount of the Note is not paid on or before the Due Date, the Note shall bear interest at the rate of 2.0% per month until paid in full. This Note may be prepaid by the Company, in whole or in part, before the Due Date without penalty.  In the event Maker fails to pay any sum due hereunder on the date when such payment is due and payable as provided herein within fifteen (15) days after receiving written notice of such default, the Company agrees to compensate Holder for his reasonable costs incurred as a result of such default, including attorney’s fees, court costs and other charges.







Miscellaneous.







1.1  Notices.  Any notice required or permitted under this Note shall be given in writing and shall be deemed effective upon personal delivery to the party to be notified or upon deposit with a recognized overnight courier service and addressed to the party at the address set forth below for such party, or at such other address as either party may designate by not less than ten (10) days advance written notice to the other party.







1.2  Binding Effect.  This Note shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, their legal representatives, successors and permitted assigns.







1.3  Amendments and Waivers.  Any term of this Note may be amended and the observance of any term of this Note may be waived (either generally or in a particular instance and either retroactively or prospectively), only with the written consent of both the Company and the Holder hereof.  Any amendment or waiver effected in accordance with this paragraph shall be binding upon Holder of this Note and the Company.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have set their hands, as of the date first above written.








	
HOLDER:

	 	
MAKER:


	
MacKov Investments Limited

	 	
RICHFIELD OIL & GAS COMPANY


	  	  	 	  	  
	
By:

	
/s/ Glenn MacNeil

	 	
By:

	
/s/ J. David Gowdy


	 	 
Glenn MacNeil

	 	 	 
J. David Gowdy, President & CEO
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18

U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur
L. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,



|1) | the
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|2) | the
                                         information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                                         and result of operations of the Company.



|By | /s/
    Arthur L. Smith     | 
|-- | --------------------------- | 
|   | Arthur
    L. Smith         | 
|   | President
    and           | 
|   | Chief
    Executive Officer | 
|   |                             | 
|   | November
    30, 2016       |
#### Salvador Guzman ENCINO; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-73053.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 2007.*

Filed Jan. 9, 2008.

Salvador Guzman Encino, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.

*853Clara Rodriguez De La Riva, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Lisa M. Arnold, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Salvador Guzman Encino and Clara Rodriguez De La Riva, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming the immigration judge’s (I J) denial of them application for cancellation of removal.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003).

Petitioners’ constitutional challenges of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) are unavailing. *See Hernandez-Mezquita v. Ashcroft,*293 F.3d 1161, 1163-65 (9th Cir.2002) (holding that NACARA’s limitation on eligibility for relief does not violate equal protection or due process).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part, DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificateis furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of June 27, 2013,by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2013-B, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),Hyundai ABS Funding, LLC (formerly known as Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation), as depositor, and U.S. Bank National Association,as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1)          	I am a duly authorized officer of theServicer.

 

2)	          A review of the activities of the Servicerfrom January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Relevant Period”) and of the Servicer’s performance underthe Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)	          Based on such review, the Servicer has,to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the RelevantPeriod.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed thisCompliance Certificate this 16th day of March, 2017.
Exhibit 99.1




Annual Servicer’s Certificate


Provided by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


to Holders of Notes and Certificates









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Michael J. McConnell, Vice-President of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as an Authorized Officer of the Company:






(1)           The undersigned has caused a review, under his supervision, to be made of:  i) the activities; and ii) the performance under the Agreement, of the Company during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”); and






(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, i) the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period; and ii) no Servicer Default has occurred.






This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to (i) Section 3.01(c) of the Servicing Agreement, as may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, dated as of March 1, 1999, by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, NILT Trust, as UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer; and (ii) Section 8.11(b) of the 2013-A SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of May 23, 2013, by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, as Titling Trust, NILT Trust, as Grantor and UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer (the “Agreement”).






Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning assigned to them in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2015.




/s/ Michael J. McConnell________________


Michael J. McConnell


Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,549
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,454<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       231
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         140,817
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,073
<SALES>                                         98,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,451
<CGS>                                           84,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,292<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,338
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,847
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,847
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are comprised of "Due from Tax Credit Partnerships," "Construc-
tion Contracts Receivable," "Notes Receivable," and "Due from Related Parties."
<F2>Other Expenses are comprised of "General and Administrative," " Depreciation
and Amortization," and "Joint Venture Losses."
</FN>


</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2390 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to eliminate the leasing authority 

of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2011 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to eliminate the 

leasing authority of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEASING OF SPACE FOR SECURITIES AND EX4 CHANGE COMMISSION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3304 of title 40, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(e) LEASING OF SPACE FOR SECURITIES AND EX9 CHANGE COMMISSION.—Notwithstanding any other provi10 sion of law, on and after the date of enactment of this 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2390 IH

1 subsection, the Securities and Exchange Commission may 

2 not lease general purpose office space. The Administrator 

3 may lease such space for the Securities and Exchange 

4 Commission under section 585 and this chapter.’’. 

5 (b) LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.— 

6 The amendment made by subsection (a) may not be con7 strued to invalidate or otherwise affect a lease entered into 

8 by the Securities and Exchange Commission before the 

9 date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 8, 2011 

0228 

Order 

 

March 8, 2011 

142013 

MICHELE LAVIGNE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142013 

 COA: 290858 

Muskegon CC: 08-045820-NI 

BRENDA GLORE, 

Defendant, 

and 

TOWNSHIP OF EGELSTON, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Daniel E. HILDOER, Claimant-Appellant, v. Gordon H. MANSFIELD, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2007-7305.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 11, 2007.

Daniel E. Hildoer, pro se.

Before RADER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and to dismiss Daniel E. Hildoer’s appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ judgment in *Hildoer v. Nicholson,*05-1626, for lack of jurisdiction. Hildoer has not responded.

Hildoer, through counsel, sought review by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims of a Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision that denied his request for service connection for fibromyalgia. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims affirmed the Board’s decision, finding that Hildoer did not show that he incurred fibromyalgia in or aggravated by active service, or that it was proximately due to, or aggravated by a service-connected disability. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims also determined that Veterans Affairs complied with the notice requirements of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (“VCAA”). Hildoer appeals to this court.

Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court has limited jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. *See Forshey v. Principi,*284 F.3d 1335, 1338 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en banc). This court “may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case.” 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2).

In his brief, Hildoer argues only that the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims wrongly found that his fibromyalgia was *261not related to his service. Hildoer does not challenge the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ finding that Veterans Affairs complied with its notice and process requirements of the VCAA, which, in any event, is a factual determination not within this court’s jurisdiction. *Mayfield v. Nicholson,*444 F.3d 1328, 1335 (Fed.Cir.2006) (noting that whether a letter satisfied the VCAA notice requirements presents a factual issue). Because Hildoer fails to raise an issue within our jurisdiction, we must dismiss this appeal.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Acting Secretary’s motions are granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of Alcentra Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ellida McMillan, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/Ellida McMillan Name: Ellida McMillan Date:  March 9, 2017