alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1944

YARED ASHAGRE GEBREGEORGIS, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-189-879) Submitted: March 24, 2006 Decided: April 10, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aragaw Mehari, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Ralph Andrew Price, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Yared Ashagre Gebregeorgis, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We deny the petition. In his petition for review, Gebregeorgis challenges the determination that he failed to establish his eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Gebregeorgis fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that he seeks. Additionally, we uphold the denial of Gebregeorgis’ request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Gebregeorgis fails to show- 3 - that he is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal. We also find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Gebregeorgis fails to meet the standard for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2005). We find that Gebregeorgis failed to make the requisite showing before the immigration court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge 

John Michael Foster 

Steven J. Klearman & Associates 

Carson City Clerk 

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KENNETH MARTIN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 632 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Unpublished Memorandum and Order of the Superior Court at No. 1474 MDA 2020 entered on October 26, 2021, quashing the PCRA Order of the Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas at Nos. CP

- 41

- CR

- 0001662

- 2012 and CP

- 41

- CR

- 0001990

- 2013 entered on October 27, 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: May 9, 2022

AND NOW

, this 9th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED , and the matter is REMANDED

to that court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Young

, 265 A.3d 462 (Pa.

2021) (“Rule 34 1 requires that when a single order resolves issues arising on more than

one docket, separate notices of appeal must be filed from that order at each docket; but,

where a timely appeal is erroneously filed at only one docket, Rule 902 permits the

appellate court, in its discretion, to allow correction of the error, where appropriate.”).

Jurisdiction is RELINQUISHED

.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as an
officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SRI on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of SRI.





|                      |  |  |  |    
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 11, 2003 |  |  |  | By:
|                      |  |  |  |    

|                      |  |  |  |    
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 11, 2003 |  |  |  | By:
|                      |  |  |  |
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
        for the period ending January 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada, Corporate Controller
        and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C,
        ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002,
 
 1)
              the
                  Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2)
              the
                  information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                  the
                  financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 By
        /s/
        Antonio Estrada
 Antonio
        Estrada
 Corporate
        Controller and
 Principal
        Financial Officer
 March
        13,
        2008
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald Rosner, Director of Finance and Administration of the Company, and its
principal accounting officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


                                                /S/ Ronald Rosner
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Ronald Rosner
                                                Director of Finance
                                                and Administration
                                                (Principal Accounting Officer)
                                                Schick Technologies, Inc.
                                                October 31, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         22,914
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,036,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    422,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,143,134
<PP&E>                                         1,908,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                 174,196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,937,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,974,050
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       70,163
<OTHER-SE>                                     (273,695)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,937,403
<SALES>                                        4,809,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,208,938
<CGS>                                          2,873,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,550,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             676,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                498,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   498,826
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL


OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of ATSI Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada Jr., Sr. Vice President of Finance & Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,




1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By
/s/ Antonio Estrada Jr.Antonio Estrada Jr.Sr. Vice President of Finance & Corporate Controller andPrincipal Financial OfficerMarch 17, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,212
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                305
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,750
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  10,633
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     6
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     6
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                6
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (172)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (172)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (172)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### The Prince Leopold.*

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Louisiana.*

1881.)

1. Towage' Services — Liens.

Towage service must be rendered to carry alien; an unexecuted contract to perform towage service is not enough.

In Admiralty.

*I. R. Beckwith,*for libellant.

*Emmet D. Craig,*for claimants.

*

Reported by Joseph P. Horner, Esq., of the New Orleans bar.

Pardee, C. J.

An unexecuted contract of affreightment gives no maritime lien. 18 How. 188; 19 How. 90. An unexecuted contract for furnishing supplies carries no lien. *The Cabarga,*3 Blatchf. 75. An unexecuted contract for wages, where the voyage was never begun and no services rendered, furnishes no lien. 1 W. Rob. 89, cited in 19 How. 90. Admiralty and maritime liens aro not given by implication. 19 How. 89. No reason is given why an unexecuted contract to furnish towage to a vessel should stand on any better footing than though the contract related to freight, wages, or materials. It is claimed that towage is a part of the voyage, (22 How. 244;) but that must be understood as towage actually furnished. The owners may have contracts with a dozen different tow-boats thaeach shall tow the ship, but it is only the ones actually towing the vessel that help begin or complete the voyage.

Let there be a decree maintaining the exception filed,' and dismissing the libel, with costs.
EXHIBIT 33.1





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED ISSUERS





Ohio Power Company (the "Servicer"), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Phase-In-Recovery Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (3)(ii) (allocation and remittance), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), (4)(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent  registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.





Date: March 29, 2019





OHIO POWER COMPANY,


as Servicer








/s/ Julia A. Sloat


Name:  Julia A. Sloat


Title: Treasurer and Senior Officer in Charge of


the Servicing Function, Ohio Power Company, as Servicer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JIHAD IBRAHIM, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 634 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Donohue and Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or 

decision of this matter.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19447]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15293 and #15294; U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Disaster 
Number VI-00009]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for the U.S. Virgin 
Islands

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS (FEMA-4335-DR), dated 09/07/2017.
    Incident: Hurricane Irma.
    Incident Period: 09/06/2017 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 09/07/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/06/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/07/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/07/2017, applications 
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined 
to be adversely affected by the disaster:

Primary Areas (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Saint John, 
Saint Thomas
Contiguous Areas (Economic Injury Loans Only): None

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      3.500
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.750
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.610
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      3.305
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      3.305
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 152938 
and for economic injury is 152940.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-19447 Filed 9-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Richard K. Crump, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Sterling
Chemicals, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report of the Company for the period ending
March 31, 2003, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 13, 2003

                                         /s/ Richard K. Crump
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Richard K. Crump,
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         of the Company



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.