alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN
THIS FORM 10-QSB FOR PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         655,445
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     48,639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               749,782
<PP&E>                                         250,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                 154,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 932,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          861,302
<BONDS>                                      2,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,074
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,007,008)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   932,368
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,376
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,015,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               844,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,872,062)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,872,062)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,872,062)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.37)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2450 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2450

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain high-intensity sweetener.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 7, 2011

Mr. Davis of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain high-intensity sweetener.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN HIGH-INTENSITY SWEETENER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``    9902.01.00       High-intensity     Free           No change      No change      On or before   ''.
                        sweetener                                                       12/31/2013.
                        extracted from
                        the cultivar
                        variety of
                        Stevia
                        Rebaudiana
                        Bertoni
                        containing at
                        least 95%
                        Rebaudioside A
                        and also
                        containing
                        Rebaudioside O
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2938.90.00).....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2



April 29, 2010




Art Parker

2356 Richardson Drive

Charlotte, North Carolina 28211



Dear Art:



The terms of your Change In Control provision in your Employment Agreement are herewith amended,
with your acknowledgement, to be as follows in event of Change in Control:





Continued coverage under the Company’s group medical plan in
accordance with the terms thereof for a period ending on the earlier
of (A) the second anniversary of the date of termination due to
Change In Control or (B) the date on which you become covered
under a comparable benefit plan of a new employer.


This creates parity for our senior team and is a change I’m sure you’ll agree with as it shows our
appreciation for you and the desire to assure fairness upon Change.



Best regards:




	 

	/s/ O. Edwin French

	 

	O. Edwin French

	President and CEO

	 

	Accepted:

	 

	/s/ James A. Parker               (Art Parker)
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK

#### Commonwealth of Virginia v. Larry Donnell Baker, Jr.

July 11, 2003

Case No. (Criminal) CR03001158

By Judge Marc Jacobson

The Defendant Larry Donnell Baker, Jr., is charged with Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Distribute and with Possession of Marijuana with Intent to Distribute More than Vi Ounce, but Less than Five Pounds. After hearing the evidence and Motion to Strike by counsel for Defendant and argument of counsel for Defendant and the Commonwealth’s Attorney, the Court took the findings under advisement.

> To support a conviction based upon constructive possession of drugs, “the Commonwealth must point to evidence of acts, statements, or conduct of the accused or other facts or circumstances which tend to show that the defendant was aware of both the presence and character of the substance and that it was subject to his dominion and control.”

*Glasco*v. *Commonwealth,*26 Va. App. 763, 774, 497 S.E.2d 150, 155 (1998) (quoting *Powers*v. *Commonwealth,*227 Va. 474, 476, 316 S.E.2d 739, 740 (1984)). In reviewing and considering the applicable laws in such cases made and provided, the Courts have held that occupancy or ownership of a vehicle containing narcotics is considered as some evidence of possession. *Glasco,*26 Va. App. at 774, 497 S.E.2d at 155 (citing *Drew*v. *Commonwealth,*230 Va. *279471, 473, 338 S.E.2d 844, 845 (1986)). However, in such cases, ownership of a vehicle *plus*some other factor or factors are indicated in order to establish constructive possession of illegal substances by a defendant.

In the instant case, the Commonwealth has shown that Defendant was driving the motor vehicle where the narcotics were found. Defendant had marijuana on his person and more marijuana and cocaine was found in the center console of the vehicle operated by the Defendant. A passenger was in the front seat of the vehicle who could have had equal access to the console. Drugs were found on Defendant, but the packaging was not similar to the drugs in the console; there was no testimony indicating defendant reaching toward the console, and no large amounts of cash, pagers, cell phones, scales, weapons, or other paraphernalia commonly associated with dealers were found in the vehicle or on Defendant’s person.

Indeed, the drugs found in the motor vehicle operated by Defendant raise suspicions, but the Commonwealth has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Distribute or Possession of Marijuana with Intent to Distribute More than 'A Ounce, but Less than Five Pounds, and, accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Strike is granted as to each of said charges.

There is sufficient evidence to find the Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the lesser-included charge of Possession of Marijuana, and the Court does find the Defendant guilty of Possession of Marijuana.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

60 CA 13-01264 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

PAUL COLEMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

1093 GROUP, LLC, 10 ELLICOTT SQUARE COURT CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS AS ELLICOTT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, AND G.M. CRISALLI & ASSOCIATES, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

----------------------------------------- 1093 GROUP, LLC, 10 ELLICOTT SQUARE COURT CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS AS ELLICOTT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, AND G.M. CRISALLI & ASSOCIATES, INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

V

SOLVAY IRON WORKS, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (KRISTIN L. NORFLEET OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MURAD AND MURAD, P.C., UTICA (FREDERICK W. MURAD OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
GOLDBERG SEGALLA, LLP, SYRACUSE (SANDRA J. SABOURIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, J.), entered September 18, 2012 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, denied third-party defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.
Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 1 and 9, 2013, and December 9, 2013, and filed in the Oneida County Clerk’s Office on December 10, 2013,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.-2- 60 CA 13-01264

Entered: February 7, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 247 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 247

      To provide for the retention of the name of Mount McKinley.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2011

Mr. Ryan of Ohio (for himself and Ms. Sutton) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide for the retention of the name of Mount McKinley.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETENTION OF NAME OF MOUNT MCKINLEY.

    Notwithstanding any other authority of law, the mountain located 63 
degrees 04 minutes 12 seconds north, by 151 degrees 00 minutes 18 
seconds west shall continue to be named and referred to for all 
purposes as Mount McKinley.
                                 <all>
```
Summary of compensation arrangement with Kurt Briner



 Exhibit 10.55 
 Summary of Compensation Package for Mr. Kurt Briner 
 On August 15, 2011, the board of
directors of BioAmber Inc. (the “Company”) approved to the following compensation package for Mr. Kurt Briner for his service as an independent director and Chairman of the Board of Directors: 

 

	 	a.	an annual fee of $50,000 with a payment schedule to be determined by the Chief Executive Officer (the fee to apply to Mr. Kurt Briner as Chairman of the Board
retroactively as of April 17, 2011); and 

  

	 	b.	the grant of options to purchase 500 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Company’s stock option plan at an exercise price of $369.14 per
share, such options vesting over two years; 50% as of April 17, 2012 and 50% as of April 17, 2013. 

 Mr. Briner
does not have a written agreement with respect to director compensation.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT FR EDY GAM AS LOPEZ, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 11-73228 Age n c y No. A089-294-649 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Oc tobe r 14, 2014 * * B e fore : LEAVY, GOULD, a n d B ER Z ON, C irc uit Judge s . Fre dy Gam a s Lope z , a native and c itiz e n of Gua te m a la , pe titions for re vie w of the B o ard of Im

m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from the im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng his a pplic at ion for a s y lum , withholding of re m ova l, a

nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Agai nst Torture(“ C AT” ). W e have 

# FIL ED NOV 10 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide n c e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings. Ze haty e v . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th C ir. 2006). W e de ny

in pa rt a nd gra nt in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w, a nd we re m and. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the de nia l of Ga

m a s Lope z ’ s C A T c la i m be c a use Gam a s Lope z fa ile d to e sta blish it is m

ore like ly tha n not hewould be torture d by

or with thec onse nt or a c q uie s c e n c e of the Guat e m a la n gove rnm e nt. Se e Silay a v . Muk

ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th C ir. 2008). Thus, we de ny the pe tition for re vie w a s to Ga m a s Lope z ’ s C AT c la i m . The re c ord c om

p e ls the c onc lusion, howeve r, tha t Ga m a s Lope z e s ta

blishe d his politic a l ne utra lity

wa s a c e ntra l re a son for the ha

rm s he suffe re d a

nd fe ars. Se e Sangha v . IN

S , 103 F.3d 1482, 1488 (9th C ir. 1997) (a n a pplic ant m ay

e s ta blish a politic a l opinion by

e sta blishing politic a l ne utra lity “ i n a n e nvironm e nt in whic h politic a l ne utra lity

is fra ught with ha

z ard” ); se e also Hu v . Holde r , 652 F.3d 1011, 1017-19 (9th C ir. 2011) (re c ord c om pe lle d the c onc lusion tha

t pe titione r e sta blishe d one c e ntra l re a son for pe rse c ution wa s a prote c te d ground). Thus, we grant the pe tition for re vie wa s to Ga m a s Lope z ’ s a sy lum and withholding of re m ova l c la im s, a

nd we re m and this c a se to the a ge nc y for furthe r proc e e dings c onsiste nt with this disposition. Se e IN S v . Ve ntura , 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (pe r c uriam ). 1 1 - 7 3 2 2 8 2Ea c h pa rty sha ll be a r its own c osts for this petition for re vie w . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; G RANT E D in par t; RE M A NDE D.

1 1 - 7 3 2 2 8 3
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D2024

- 1949 L.T. Case No. 1996-CF- 012318 -B

_____________________________ J ASON T YLON S COTT H OOKER , Appella nt,
v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee
.

_____________________________ On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Jonathan David Sacks, Judge. Ja son Tylon Scott Hooker, Orlando, pro se. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, and Zachary Lawton, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. August 27 , 2024 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).
E DWARDS , C.J., a nd L AMBERT and J AY , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
Exhibit
31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Jeffrey T. Slovin, certify that: 1.
  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
  of Schick Technologies, Inc.;2.
  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
  any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
  which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
  covered by this report;3.
  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
  other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
  flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;4.
  The registrants other certifying officer and I are
  responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  registrant and have:a)
  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
  supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
  those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
  prepared;b)
  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
  disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
  conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
  procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
  evaluation; andc)
  Disclosed in this report any change in the
  registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
  the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
  reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
  over financial reporting; and5.
  The registrants other certifying officer and I have
  disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
  financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
  the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)
  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
  in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
  process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  August
  9, 2005/S/ Jeffrey T. Slovin[Signature]Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive
  Officer)
EXHIBIT 11.1
                         THE NORTH FACE, INC.

                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              (In thousands, except per share amounts)
                            (unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                                September 30,       September 30,
                                            ------------------- ------------------
                                               1998      1997      1998     1997
                                            --------- --------- -------- ---------

<S>                                            <C>       <C>       <C>      <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding 
  during the period:

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic  12,481    11,262   11,996    11,260

Incremental shares from assumed
  exercise of stock options.............        271       446      267       407
                                           --------- --------- -------- ---------
Weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares outstanding - diluted    12,752    11,708   12,263    11,667
                                           ========= ========= ======== =========

Net Income.............................     $10,766   $10,767   $8,556    $8,995
                                           ========= ========= ======== =========

Net Income Per Share
     Basic..............................      $0.86     $0.96    $0.71     $0.80

     Diluted............................      $0.84     $0.92    $0.70     $0.77



</TABLE>
exv10w28






Exhibit 10.28




Group 1 Automotive, Inc.




Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation

Effective January 1, 2011



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Amount
	Annual Retainer1:
	 	 	 	 
	Cash
	 	$	35,000	 
	Stock2
	 	 	95,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Additional Annual Retainers:
	 	 	 	 
	Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
	 	 	100,000	 
	Audit Committee Chair
	 	 	25,000	 
	Compensation Committee Chair
	 	 	15,000	 
	All Other Committee Chairs
	 	 	10,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Meeting Fees3:
	 	 	 	 
	Board
	 	 	2,500	 
	Audit Committee
	 	 	2,500	 
	Non-Audit Committee
	 	 	1,500	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Vehicle Stipend
	 	 	17,600	 








 




			
	1.	 	Payable in quarterly installments.
	 
	2.	 	Granted under Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan; valued at the date of
grant.
	 
	3.	 	Abbreviated meetings, as determined at the discretion of the chair, will result in the
payment of one-half of the regular fees for the meeting.





Summary of Director

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Approved November 2009



Directors are required to maintain ownership of a minimum of 10,000 shares of Group 1
Automotive, Inc.’s common stock. The minimum ownership requirement must be achieved within
five years of election to the Board of Directors. Restricted stock granted to directors as
part of the annual retainer counts toward the minimum ownership requirement without regard to the
vesting or other liquidity provisions related thereto.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** ** 

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

**  **

** **

I, Victor A. De Jesús,do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation,and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under theSale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2013 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2013-A,as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)     A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement,has been made under my supervision.

 

(ii)    To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand as of March 13, 2015.

 

 

WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.

 

 

By:/s/ Victor A. De Jesús                           

Name: Victor A. De Jesús

Title: Vice President, Finance and Administration/

  Chief Financial Officer