alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following 
meetings related to the transmission planning activities of the New 
York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO):

NYISO Business Issues Committee Meeting

September 12, 2017, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. (EST)

    The above-referenced meeting will be via web conference and 
teleconference.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: http://www.nyiso.com/public/committees/documents.jsp?com=bic&directory=2017-09-12.

NYISO Operating Committee Meeting

September 15, 2017, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. (EST)

    The above-referenced meeting will be via web conference and 
teleconference.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: http://www.nyiso.com/public/committees/documents.jsp?com=oc&directory=2017-09-15.

NYISO Electric System Planning Working Group Meeting

September 26, 2017, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. (EST)

    The above-referenced meeting will be via web conference and 
teleconference.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: http://www.nyiso.com/public/committees/documents.jsp?com=bic_espwg&directory=2017-09-26.

NYISO Management Committee Meeting

September 27, 2017, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. (EST)

    The above-referenced meeting will be via web conference and 
teleconference.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: http://www.nyiso.com/public/committees/documents.jsp?com=mc&directory=2017-09-27.
    The discussions at the meetings described above may address matters 
at issue in the following proceedings:
    New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Docket No. ER13-102.
    New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Docket No. ER15-2059.
    New York Transco, LLC, Docket No. ER15-572.
    For more information, contact James Eason, Office of Energy Market 
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-8622 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c163d31392f72193d2f33321c3a392e3f723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="773d161a1204593216041819371112051459101801">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 5, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19562 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 173 (Friday, September 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19023]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

    Part C (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of the 
Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority of 
the Department of Health and Human Services (45 FR 67772-76, dated 
October 14, 1980, and corrected at 45 FR 69296, October 20, 1980, as 
amended most recently at 75 FR 6677, dated February 10, 2010) is 
amended to reflect the Order of Succession for the Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
    Section C-C, Order of Succession, is hereby amended as follows:
    Delete in its entirety Section C-C, Order of Succession, and insert 
the following:
    During the absence or disability of the Director, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), or in the event of a vacancy in 
that office, the first official listed below who is available shall act 
as Director, except that during a planned period of absence, the 
Director may specify a different order of succession:

1. Principal Deputy Director
2. Director, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response
3. Associate Director for Science
4. Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Sherri Berger,
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2017-19023 Filed 9-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4160-18-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

February 6, 2013

h0130

Order 

February 6, 2013

145702

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145702

COA: 301762

Saginaw CC: 03-022744-FC

CHARLES HENRY ARTHUR,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 26, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Saginaw Circuit Court for 

an evidentiary hearing regarding the decision to keep the defendant in shackles during the 

trial. We ORDER the trial court to articulate with particularity, on the record, its reasons 

for requiring the defendant to wear shackles at his jury trial. The court shall receive 

evidence and make findings of fact regarding: (1) whether the physical restraints were 

justified under Deck v Missouri, 544 US 622; 125 S Ct 2007; 161 L Ed 2d 953 (2005), 

and (2) whether those restraints were visible to any jurors, either during jury selection or 

afterward. We DIRECT the trial court to commence the hearing within 35 days of the 

date of this order. We further ORDER that court to submit a transcript of the hearing, 

along with its findings of fact and conclusions of law, to the Clerk of this Court within 28 

days of the conclusion of the hearing.

We retain jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc.
(SRI), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SRI on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SRI.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 10, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    GERALD
WOODARD  
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Gerald Woodard         
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald Rosner, Director of Finance and Administration of the Company, and its
principal financial officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


                                        /S/ Ronald Rosner
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ronald Rosner
                                        Director of Finance
                                        and Administration
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
                                        Schick Technologies, Inc.
                                        February 12, 2004


                                       20
Exhibit 33.6

|(logo) NTS NATIONAL
        TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900
        Chicago, IL 60601
        (312) 233-6440
|------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA





For the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, National Tax Search,
LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the “Servicer”).



National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”) is responsible for assessing
compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”)
with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS
has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.
Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect
to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d)
of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report.
The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform
Transactions”).



NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.



Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting
firm, has issued an attestation report on ’the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO

January 18, 2016
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R AU L L UN A- B AR B OS A, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 10442 D . C . N o . 4 : 0 8 - c r - 0 1 1 7 9 - J MR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J ohn M . R ol l , C hi e f

Judge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r25, 2011 ** B e f o r e : T R O T T , G O U L D , an dR A W L I N S O N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . R au l L u n a - B arb o s aap p e a ls f r o m h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n a n d4 6 - m o n th s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f

orbe i ng a n i l l e ga l a l i e n f ound i n the U ni t e d S t a t e s f ol l ow i ng de port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 1967) , L una - B arbos a ’ s c ouns e l ha s f i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng the r e a r e no 

# FI LED NO V 03 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 10442 2 gr ounds f

orr e l i e f , a l ong w i th am ot i on t o w i thdr aw a s c ouns e l of r e c or d. W e ha ve p r o v i d e dth e ap p e l l an twi th th e o p p o rtu n i tyt o f i l e ap r o s e s up p l e m e n t a l b r i e f . No pr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f ora ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N T E D . AF F I RME D.
#### In the Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc., Respondent, v Planning Board of Town of Southeast et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Richard Feuerman et al., Respondents, v Planning Board of Town of Southeast et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Croton Watershed Clean Water Coalition, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Planning Board of Town of Southeast et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Cherie Ingraham et al., Respondents, v Planning Board of Town of Southeast et al., Appellants.

Submitted December 24, 2007;

decided February 12, 2008

Motions for reargument denied *{see*9 NY3d 219 (2007)].
Schedule of Change in Control Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10(a)(5) 

SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENTS 
  

					
	 	  	Term	 
	 H. P. Mechler
	  	 	18 months	  
	 George Muller
	  	 	12 months	  
	 J. Eric Story
	  	 	12 months	  
	 Raylene M. Carter
	  	 	12 months
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 29 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 29

   To authorize the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the 
Capitol by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in 
   connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the 
inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 20, 2016

    Mr. Blunt (for himself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   To authorize the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the 
Capitol by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in 
   connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the 
inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the 
                             United States.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION HALL OF THE CAPITOL.

    The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the United States Capitol are 
authorized to be used on January 20, 2017, by the Joint Congressional 
Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings 
and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of the President-elect 
and the Vice President-elect of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21(a)



SUBSIDIARIES OF OXIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.



As of December 31, 2004, the Companys subsidiaries were as follows:



|                             |  |                              
|---------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                         |  | Jurisdiction of incorporation
|                             | 
|OXIS Health Products, Inc.   |  | Delaware                     
|OXIS Therapeutics, Inc.      |  | Delaware                     
|OXIS International S.A.      |  | France                       
|OXIS Acquisition Corporation |  | Delaware                     
|OXIS Isle of Man Limited     |  | Isle of Man                  
|OXIS Instruments, Inc.       |  | Pennsylvania
#### Joseph HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Richard L STALDER; Lynn Cooper; Alphonse Pacheco; Bud Hayes; Cindy Soileau; Carol Jeansonne; J Aymond; Jacob Louis; Sidney Fisher; Jennifer Doyle, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-31277

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 3, 2008.

Joseph Harris, Cottonport, LA, pro se.

PER CURIAM: *

Joseph Harris, Louisiana prisoner # 368687, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil-rights lawsuit, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Harris has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, challenging the district court’s certification that his appeal was not taken in good faith pursuant to *Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 199-202 (5th Cir.1997).

Harris alleged that the defendants were liable for his physical injuries because he slipped and fell on the wet prison kitchen floor and because they failed to provide him with proper medical treatment for those injuries. Harris fails to allege a viable deliberate indifference claim on these bases. *See Domino v. Texas Dep’t of Criminal Justice,*239 F.3d 752, 756 (5th Cir.2001); *Neals v. Norwood,*59 F.3d 530, 533 (5th Cir.1995). Although Harris also alleges that he was attacked in the infirmary by some prison personnel, that claim fails because it is not supported by a physical injury that is more than de minimis. *See Siglar v. Hightower,*112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir.1997). Harris’s claim regarding the prison administrative process fails because he does not have a liberty interest in having his prison administrative complaint resolved in a certain manner. *See Geiger v. Jowers,*404 F.3d 371, 373-74 (5th Cir.2005). The district court’s certification that Harris’s appeal is not taken in good faith is upheld, Harris’s motion for IFP is denied, and this appeal is dismissed as frivolous. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 & n. 24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Harris is hereby informed that the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), in addition to the strike for the district court’s dismissal. *See Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir.1996). We caution Harris that if he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
 AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.
 SUMMARY: The Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received 
                        ( print page 42279)
                        petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. Accordingly, EDA has initiated investigations to determine whether increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each of these firms contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firm's workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm. List of Petitions Received by EDA for Certification Eligibility To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance 8/24/2017 Through 8/31/2017
Firm name
Firm address
Date accepted for 
                             investigation
Product(s)Dusty Strings Company
3450 16th Avenue West, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98119
8/29/2017
The firm manufactures harps and other string instruments, such as dulcimers.Pentz Design Pattern & Foundry, Inc
14823 Main Street Northeast, Duvall, WA 98019
8/28/2017
The firm manufactures custom precision aluminum castings and molds.Perfection Spring & Stamping Corporation
1449 East Algonquin Road, Mount Prospect, IL 60056
8/29/2017
The firm manufactures wire forms, springs and other articles of iron and steel.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. These petitions are received pursuant to section 251 of the Trade Act 1974, as amended. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA's regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Miriam Kearse, Lead Program Analyst.


[FR Doc. 2017-18956 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-WH-P