alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           36088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    11925
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     318883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                377927
<PP&E>                                          141624
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  661410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           367091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                    (320532)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    661410
<SALES>                                         906385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                915142
<CGS>                                           635383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   635383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                302382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               11960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (34583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (34583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (34583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.06)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2






Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




1. Xenonics Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and Jeffrey Kennedy (“Kennedy”) hereby agree
that this Amendment amends Section 1 of the Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2003,
between the Company and Kennedy (the “Employment Agreement”).



2. Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in full as follows:




“1. Term of Employment




Subject to the provisions of Section 10 below, the Company shall employ the Executive, and the
Executive shall serve the Company in the capacity of President for a term commencing as of January
1, 2003 and ending that date which is 30 days after either party provides the other party with
written notice of termination, except that, in the event that the Company terminates Kennedy
without cause, the term shall end on that date which is 36 months after the date the Company
provides Kennedy with written notice of termination (the “Term of Employment).”



3. Except for the foregoing, the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force
and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated:  December 16, 2010 	XENONICS HOLDINGS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Jeffrey Kennedy
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 42938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1


Income Taxes

CFR Correction

0
 In Title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1 (Sec. Sec.  
1.170 to 1.300), revised as of April 1, 2017, on page 8, the authority 
citation for Sec.  1.199-2T is revised to read: ``Section 1.199-2T also 
issued under 26 U.S.C. 199(b)(3).''

[FR Doc. 2017-19396 Filed 9-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 26, 2021 b0519

Order 

Clerk

May 26, 2021

161746

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161746

COA: 352449

Genesee CC: 08-024090-FC

GEOFFREY LAVAR LAWSON, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 6, 2020 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Genesee County Prosecuting 

Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this 

order. In particular, the prosecuting attorney shall address: (1) whether the presumption 

of prejudice to a defendant from a substantive communication with a jury outside the 

presence of defense counsel applies when such a claim is brought in a motion for relief 

from judgment, compare People v France, 436 Mich 138, 143 (1990), with MCR 

6.508(D)(3)(b); and (2) if such a presumption applies here, whether trial counsel’s 

statement that he had no objection to the court providing the written jury instruction 

effectively rebuts that presumption or whether an evidentiary hearing must be held. 

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jimmy Wayne Carr, Appellant

No. 06-19-00130-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 27812). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Jimmy Wayne Carr, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 9, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                       171
<INVENTORY>                                      1,865
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,573
<PP&E>                                         428,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 490,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,780
<BONDS>                                        166,764
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                     296,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   490,968
<SALES>                                         48,108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,108
<CGS>                                           20,162
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,412
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,294
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,940
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.



/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:  Jennifer M. DavisTitle:    Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:    March 29, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
MARCH 31, 1998, CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CASINO MAGIC CORP.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,580,978
<SECURITIES>                                10,430,049
<RECEIVABLES>                                  490,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    196,393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,213,165
<PP&E>                                      82,794,029
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,190,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             138,119,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,350,612
<BONDS>                                    116,998,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,770,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               138,119,880
<SALES>                                     27,927,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,927,983
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,927,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               885,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,251,147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,485
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             86,485
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    86,485
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    86.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    86.49
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41140

Summary Calendar

 

JOSE RODRIGUEZ CRUZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PETER GONZALEZ CRUZ; JAVIER V. LOPEZ;

THOMAS CURRI; JOAN HIGGINS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

UDC No. L-96-CV-21

- - - - - - - - - -

March 18, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Texas state prisoner Jose Rodriguez Cruz, no. 681066, has

filed a motion to supplement the record on appeal and to suspend

the briefing notice. 

The district court dismissed with prejudice Cruz’s federal

civil action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The district court correctly found

Cruz’s complaints regarding cruel and unusual punishment to be
No. 97-41140

-2-

barred by the relevant statute of limitations. See Gartrell v.

Gaylor, 981 F.2d 254, 256-57 (5th Cir. 1993); Spina v. Aaron, 821

F.2d 1126, 1128-29 (5th Cir. 1987). The district court also

construed Cruz’s claim that he was held for two and a half years

in the custody of the Immigration and Naturalization Services as

a habeas claim challenging the constitutionality of the detention

procedures of 8 C.F.R. § 212.12. The district court did not err

by denying the claim as lacking in merit. See Gisbert v. U.S.

Attorney General, 988 F.2d 1437, 1446-48 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Finally, the district court did not err by denying Cruz’s request

for relief from future INS custody following his release from

Texas state custody as not presenting a live case or controversy. 

See Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir. 1987).

Because there is no meritorious issue that Cruz could raise

regarding the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his

action, Cruz’s appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R.

42.2. His motion is DENIED as unnecessary.

We caution Cruz that any additional frivolous appeals filed

by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. 

To avoid sanctions, Cruz is further cautioned to review any

pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that

are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
#### Loud *v.*Stone.

*(Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts.*

May 3, 1882.)

Patents fon Inventions — Pumps fon Vessels.

Considering the state of the art, the patentee of a pump should not he limited to a diaphragm chamber placed at the side of the uptake. A pump otherwise similar, hut varying only in having the diaphragm over the uptake, is an infringement.

In Equity.

*James E. Maynadier*and *Fredk. Dodge,*for complainant.

*T. L. Wakefield,*for defendant.

Lowell, C. J.

The plaintiff is the owner of the patent No. 188,-879, granted to one Eells and himself, for an improvement in ships’ pumps, in March, 1877. The patentees describe tbeir invention to consist—

> “In the arrangement of a diaphragm chamber, placed at the side of the uptake, and of valves in the upper part of the uptake, which, acting in connection with said diaphragm chamber, constitute a pump which has a straight uptake, having no obstruction in it except two puppet valves, which are placed at the extreme upper end, and are so accessible as to be removed at any time by the hand alone, thus leaving the uptake free to be cleansed, or used as a sounding well.”

They show by description and drawings the mode of constructing this pump. The single claim is:

> “The combination of the diaphragm pump, D, 0, T>’, A, with the valve chamber, H, in the uptake; said chamber being provided with valves, K, K’, all operating together, substantially as described.”

The plaintiff’s pump is proved to be a valuable one for ships, and to contain a new combination of puppet or poppet valves, easily adjusted and removed by hand, with the diaphragm pump. The important and difficult question is whether the invention is infringed by a pump in which the diaphragm is placed over the uptake instead *722of at one side. The plaintiff placed his diaphragm at one side, in order to obtain free access to his straight uptake and his puppet valves, for convenient cleansing and sounding. The defendant’s pump, invented by Mr. Edson, has, so far as I can judge, several improvements of construction over the Loud pump; and the described advantages of the Loud pump are obtained in a somewhat different way. There is a straight uptake, with large accessible puppet valves, removable by hand; but the diaphragm is placed over the uptake, and is made in an annular form, so that access to the uptake is through the open top of the diaphragm.

Considering the state of the art, I do not think the plaintiff should be limited to a diaphragm situated at one side of his uptake. The essence of his improvement was that the chamber and valves should be so arranged in a diaphragm pump that they could be reached and the valves be removed by hand, for the purposes specified, and this improvement the defendant has retained, whatever else he may have added.

Decree for the complainant.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as an
officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SRI on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of SRI.



|                        |  |     |  |                           
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Christopher S. Carlton
|                        |  |     |  | Christopher S. Carlton    
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer   
|                        |  |    
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Wallace D. Ruiz       
|                        |  |     |  | Wallace D. Ruiz           
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the fiscal
1996 Consolidated Fiancial Statements of Ameriking, Inc. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      660 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,602
<PP&E>                                          47,043 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,834 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,102 
<BONDS>                                        107,664 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           31,278
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                             9 
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,219)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,834
<SALES>                                         49,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,393
<CGS>                                           15,731
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,397
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    23
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,945
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,063)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (425)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (638)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (638)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.77)
        


</TABLE>
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2422 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 45 Bay Street, Suite 2, in Staten Island, 

New York, as the ‘‘Sergeant Angel Mendez Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2422 EH

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT ANGEL MENDEZ POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 45 Bay Street, Suite 2, in Staten 

4 Island, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Sergeant Angel Mendez Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Angel 

10 Mendez Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2422 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMendez Post Office’’. Staten Island, New York, as the ‘‘Sergeant Angel al Service located at 45 Bay Street, Suite 2, in