alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Health
Fitness Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2006 (the
"Periodic Report"), I, Wesley W. Winnekins, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

/s/ Wesley W. Winnekins

Wesley W. Winnekins
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2006
OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY GENERAL OF RxAs 

Crosier 
. ’ 

:jonorl;ble R. L. Crooior, PaFe 2 . 

The contmot dot33 not bear the 

the Cozptrollor or the Attorney General. 

ti.:.t- i ir. Zcyd is not cn attornsy p.t law. 

ym requs6t our opinion RG to VJhsther or 

ic c velld ons. 

approv61 of either 

You aloo nuviseii 

In subdmms, 

not 6nid ccntrnot 

St k3 noterl thet unSor the contract a cons,iberc3i.e p6rt of i:r. Zoy&(6 autloo 6re connected wltii the 

collection of delinquent texee. Us ls rocguired to collect ad.6 en3 fieurca ana facts pertnlnln~ to or rmes62&y for tke collection or Usllnqusnt tsses ana to gropzre pt-psrf3 arid QleUdhIg6 in lnetanco6 wY~crs It 16 reasibls to 'k-in% suLts for t:?e oolleotlcn of doliriqasnt tcxe6, 

! in Artlcls 7335c, Vernon's Civil Gtatutee, it lo provided 

thr.t *no contract 6?1cll be mde or entered into by the 

acn~ls61cns~a8 court in ccnnectlon Mth the collcctlon 

of ,iisllnquent taxes %:hera the ooclpcnsstlcn uniler euch oontmct 1s mora thsn.flrteen per cent of the znount colleoted: 

.* %lFl cmtmct nuet be .zpgrovad by both the Comptroller anB 

tfis Attorney Gsnsm.1 0r the.Stato of Texas both i3.6 to subctmce me form. . . . my-: contract fide in vlolatlon of 

(,1, 

Ii;716 Act shall be voib." Follculnq.thc provlfilons of 5pAu 

6rt:ale 73356 it ha been Etginltely e6tsbll6hcd that oonIi& trmtt..ettcq%ed to be made by'counise~onors~ oourts in 

qmnectlon with collection of c¶ellnqient tzxee ore abaolutely mid unless approved by'the St&e Comptrbller end Attorney C*neral.. E-U.te v. &Gill, 114 3. E. (2a).MO, by the 

Zupreize Court; Za6terdcod v. HcnSer6cn County, 62 8, Y. (2a)~ 

66, by the Comloaion of &meals;.Sylvan Sanders CoGpony v. 

scurry County, 77 S. W. 

peals. 

(26) $09, by ths CouPt of Civil #.Q; 

It is tmncoe66ary for us to inquire further into 

the contraot In que6tlon since it falls squarely within 

the above cited cuaea. The icct that ths contmot dcee not 

bear the approval of the Ccrqtrcller an9 Attorney Censral. 

r6naer6 the eme void rc~mIlc66 of anything else. For 

your lniornstion, Iye enclose copy or 3ur opinlcn Xc. 0-2959. 

Yours very truly 

LkTac4LF 

Glcrnn R. Lmls 

GRL:LX Aedllatant 

E:;CLOSUFE 2 

.,, 

‘- 

,i: ,.-.-----,, .’ 

: I .., 

;‘\ 

!-“. ~-3 . .pw? i,....,,, ‘---I(
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function


of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)









SERVICER CERTIFICATION






I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2013-B Trust (the “Exchange Act Periodic Reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;




4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  Citibank, N.A.




Date:                      June 27, 2014




By:/s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES M. YEAGER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 78 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of September, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Jose Antonio RUELAS-DORADO, Petitioner v. Michael B MUKASEY, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-60976

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 24, 2008.

J. Joseph Reina, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Robbin K. Blaya, Edward C. Durant, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Kristi Barrows, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Dallas, TX, for Respondent.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Antonio Ruelas-Dorado (Ruelas), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) removal order. Ruelas contends that he is eligible for an adjustment of status because 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i) exempts the ground of inadmissibility set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I). This court has previously upheld as reasonable the *621BIA’s determination that § 1255(i) does not exempt the ground of inadmissibility set forth in § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I). *Mortera-Cruz v. Gonzales,*409 F.3d 246, 256 (5th Cir.2005). To the extent Ruelas argues that *Mortera-C/mz*was incorrectly decided, one panel of this court may not overrule a prior panel’s decision in the absence of an intervening contrary or superseding decision by this court sitting en banc or by the United States Supreme Court. *See United States v. Ruff,*984 F.2d 635, 640 (5th Cir.1993).

Ruelas also contends that he is eligible for an adjustment of status under § 1255(i) with a Form 1-212 waiver because a Form 1-212 waiver would cure his inadmissibility under § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I). This court lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of a Form 1-212 waiver. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B).

Finally, Ruelas contends that the BIA’s interpretation of § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) leaves the statute open to a constitutional attack on equal protection grounds. Ruelas does not identify which classes or groups of immigrants are allegedly treated differently by the BIA’s interpretation of § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I). Further, this court has held that the conduct proscribed by § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) is both different from and more culpable than the conduct of an alien who is inadmissible only under § 1182(a)(6)(A)®. *Mortera-Cruz,*409 F.3d at 255-56. Therefore, Ruelas’s conclusional equal protection claim is without merit.

Accordingly, Ruelas’s petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 23, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Open Platform for NFV Project, Inc. (“Open Platform for NFV Project”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Institute for Information Industry, Taipei, TAIWAN, has been added as a party to this venture.                

Also, Beijing Internet Institute, Beijing, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Open Platform for NFV Project intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On October 17, 2014, Open Platform for NFV Project filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 14, 2014 (79 FR 68301).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 30, 2017. A notice was published in the                     **Federal                               ( print page 43569)                            Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 28, 2017 (82 FR 29328).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2017-19791 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
exv10w18






EXHIBIT 10.18




USG CORPORATION




 






Annual Base Salaries

of

Named Executive Officers




 






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	NAMED EXECUTIVE	 	 	 	ANNUAL BASE
	OFFICER	 	TITLE	 	SALARY
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	William C. Foote	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	$	1,150,000	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	James S. Metcalf	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	825,000	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Richard H. Fleming	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	530,000	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Christopher R. Griffin	 	Executive Vice President — Operations
	 	 	375,000	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Fareed A. Khan	 	Executive Vice President, Finance and Strategy
	 	 	385,000
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2395 

To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to permit the establishment 

of Jobs Corps centers in territories of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2011 

Mr. SABLAN (for himself, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Ms. 

RICHARDSON, Ms. NORTON, Ms. CHU, Mr. WU, Mr. KUCINICH, Ms. 

BORDALLO, Mr. PIERLUISI, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. WILSON of 

Florida, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. BROWN of Florida, 

Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Mr. PASTOR of Arizona, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. 

POLIS, Ms. CLARKE of New York, and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to permit 

the establishment of Jobs Corps centers in territories 

of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF TERRITORIES FOR JOBS 

4 CORPS CENTERS. 

5 Section 147(a) of the Workforce Investment Act of 

6 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2887(a)) is amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2395 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ‘‘or simi2 lar agency of an outlying area,’’ after ‘‘local agen3 cy’’; and 

4 (2) in paragraph (2)(B)(i)(III), by inserting 

5 ‘‘(or outlying area)’’ after ‘‘State’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19680]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than September 27, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments 
can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#713001011d18121005181e1f025f321e1c1c141f05023110051d5f1703135f1e0316"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="115061617d78727065787e7f623f527e7c7c747f65625170657d3f7763733f7e6376">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Kenneth Ray Lehman, Arlington, Virginia; to acquire voting 
shares of ABB Financial Group, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
shares of Affinity Bank, both of Atlanta, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 12, 
2017.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-19680 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

Deloitte & Touche LLP
333 Clay Street,
Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002

August 8, 2005

Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
333 Clay Street, Suite 3600
Houston, Texas 77002

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial
information of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") for the
three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, as indicated in our
report dated August 8, 2005; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed
no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is
incorporated by reference in the Company's Registration Statement No. 333-105794
on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2446 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2446

To clarify the treatment of homeowner warranties under current law, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 7, 2011

Mrs. Biggert (for herself and Mr. Clay) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify the treatment of homeowner warranties under current law, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``RESPA Home Warranty Clarification 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF HOMEOWNER WARRANTIES.

    Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (12 
U.S.C. 2607) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(e) Homeowner Warranties.--
            ``(1) In general.--Nothing in this section, section 2, or 
        section 3 shall be deemed to include, or be deemed to have 
        included, homeowner warranties or similar residential service 
        contracts for the repair or replacement of home system 
        components or home appliances.
            ``(2) Notice.--Any person that pays another person not 
        employed by the person for selling, advertising, marketing, or 
        processing, or performing an inspection in connection with, a 
        homeowner warranty or similar residential service contract for 
        the repair or replacement of home system components or home 
        appliances shall include the following statement, in boldface 
        type that is 10-point or larger, in any such warranty or 
        contract offered or sold as an incident to or as part of any 
        transaction involving the origination of a federally related 
        mortgage loan:
                    ``NOTICE: THIS COMPANY MAY PAY PERSONS NOT EMPLOYED 
                BY THE COMPANY FOR SELLING, ADVERTISING, MARKETING, OR 
                PROCESSING, OR PERFORMING AN INSPECTION IN CONNECTION 
                WITH, A HOMEOWNER WARRANTY OR SIMILAR RESIDENTIAL 
                SERVICE CONTRACT FOR REPAIRING OR REPLACING HOME SYSTEM 
                COMPONENTS OR HOME APPLIANCES.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2020 (the “Report”) of Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Armen Panossian , the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    Armen PanossianName:    Armen PanossianDate: November 18, 2020
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130881 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130881 COA: 264217 Wayne CC: 92-012971 DION HASTIE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

             STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                    Three Months Ended
                                                         March 31,         
                                                   -----------------------     
                                                     1996         1997
                                                   ---------   -----------     
<S>                                                <C>         <C> 
Net loss..........................................  (569,000)     (712,000)
                                                   =========     ========= 
Shares:
    Weighted average number of shares
      outstanding................................. 3,243,391     3,243,391
    Dilutive effect of options to be
      issued(1)...................................   365,820       365,820
                                                   ---------   -----------
    Total shares used in computing pro
      forma net loss per share.................... 3,609,211     3,609,211
                                                   =========     =========
Net loss per share (primary
  & fully dilutive)...............................     (0.16)        (0.20)
                                                   =========     ========= 
</TABLE> 
------------
(1)  Reflects the shares of Common Stock issuable to employees related to
     exercisable options (at exercise prices substantially less than the
     offering price) that are outstanding under the Equity Appreciation Plan as
     of the pricing of the IPO, less shares assumed to be repurchased using the
     treasury stock method.