alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - [Docket No. USCG-2016-1084]

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability and request for comments; extension of comment period.

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard is extending the comment period for its notice of availability and request for comments, published on July 12, 2017. The notice announced the availability of the draft Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular (NVIC) 05-17 entitled Guidelines for Addressing Cyber Risks at Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) Regulated Facilities, and requested public comments on the draft. The comment period was set to close on September 11, 2017. The Coast Guard has received requests to extend the comment period by 30 days due to the conditions caused by hurricane Harvey, which prevent some members of the public from submitting comments by the original deadline.

# DATES:

Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or before October 11, 2017.

# ADDRESSES:

                        You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-2016-1084 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at                         *http://www.regulations.gov.*                         See the “Public Participation and Request for Comments” portion of the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section of the July 12, 2017 notice for further instructions on submitting comments.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        If you have questions on this notice, call or email, Jason Warren, Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-1106, email                         *Jason.S.Warren@uscg.mil*                         or LCDR Josephine Long, Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-1109, email                         *Josephine.A.Long@uscg.mil.*

      ( print page 42561)    
Dated: September 5, 2017.

R.D. Manning,

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Office of Port and Facility Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2017-19037 Filed 9-7-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2013-SN1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2016

TOMMY RAY COMBS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ASHE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, a group of defendants consisting of Ashe County Health

Department, Mary Elizabeth Lyon Smith, M.D.,

former director Carl Tuttle, present director

Daniel Staley, Wanda Elliott, nurses supervisor, Governor James B. Hunt, Charles D.

Reed, State Pharmacist, H. David Bruton, M.D.,

Secretary of Department of Health and Human

Services of N.C., Betty Chisley, Department of

Civil Rights Office of DHHS, Washington, DC,

Congressman Richard Burr, Kathy B. Manship,

Leslie J. Mann, Marie A. Chretien,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CA-99-64-5-V)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Tommy Ray Combs, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Tommy Ray Combs appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his action filed pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act

for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Combs v. Ashe County Health Dep’t, No. CA99-64-5-V (W.D.N.C. July 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2338 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2012 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 600 Florida Avenue in Cocoa, Florida, as 

the ‘‘Harry T. and Harriette Moore Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

HR 2338 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. HARRY T. AND HARRIETTE MOORE POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 600 Florida Avenue in Cocoa, 

5 Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Harry T. 

6 and Harriette Moore Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Harry T. and Har11 riette Moore Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 28, 

2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with
Exhibit 35.1

[Citi logo]

1123  Servicer Compliance
Statement

Transactions Listed With SEC

I, Shawn Kormanek, Senior Vice President of CitiMortgage, Inc., certify that:

(a) A review of CitiMortgage, Inc. (the Servicer) activities during the 12 month period ending December 31, 2016 (Reporting
Period) and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement as identified on Schedule A has been made under my

supervision.

(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|                  |  |                                                                                
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|February 27, 2017
|                  | 
|By:               |  | /s/ Shawn Kormanek                                                             
|Name:             |  | Shawn Kormanek                                                                 
|Title:            |  | Senior Vice President, CitiMortgage, Inc.
Senior Officer in Charge of Servicing



---

Schedule A

Transactions Listed with SEC 2016



|                     |  |                                             |  |                                                                            
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Investor/Bond Number |  | Security or Deal                            |  | Party the Servicer Is Reporting To (Master
Servicer or Trustee or Investor)
|-                    |  | SEQUOIA MORTGAGE TRUST 2013-8 (SEMT 2013-8) |  | CITIMORTGAGE, INC. MASTER SERVICING
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE
30, 1998, CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CASINO MAGIC OF LOUISIANA, CORP.
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,333,043
<SECURITIES>                                11,699,487
<RECEIVABLES>                                  512,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    194,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,280,913
<PP&E>                                      87,623,332
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,370,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             140,200,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,674,287
<BONDS>                                    116,440,353
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     993,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               140,200,073
<SALES>                                     54,772,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,772,230
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               44,965,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,927,583
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,478,151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (598,915)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (598,915)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (598,915)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (598.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (598.92)
        

</TABLE>
#### ELECTRONIC DETECTION PRODUCTS, INC. v. Reynold S. CHAPIN, Chapin Electronics, Inc., and Electro-Security Corporation.

Civ. A. No. 59-526-J.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

Dec. 31, 1959.

*122John F. Groden, John M. Reed, Joseph Weingarten, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Robert B. Russell, Porter, Chittick & Russell, Boston, Mass., for defendants.

JULIAN, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendants under Rule 19(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. to add as parties plaintiff a Massachusetts business corporation and three individuals. The action is one for declaratory judgment to determine the validity of a patent issued to the defendant, Reynold S. Chapin. The defendants have counterclaimed for damages alleging, among other things, infringement of the patent by the plaintiff and by the Massachusetts business corporation and the three individuals sought to be joined. The defendants contend in their brief that there exists “a complex maze of personal and inter-corporate dealings” designed to cast upon the plaintiff corporation alone, alleged in the counterclaim to be “hopelessly insolvent,” all liability for infringement incurred by the parties sought to be joined. The defendants’ allegations, however, do not state any claim against either John E. Lawrence or Forrester A. Clark. Therefore, with respect to Lawrence and Clark defendants’ motion is denied.

 Counsel for the plaintiff contended in his brief and at the hearing that the defendants’ motion was more properly laid under Rule 13(h) and that Rule 13(h) permitted joinder of “necessary” parties only. See Kuhn v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, D.C.E.D.Mo., 12 F.R.D. 252; Edwards v. Rogers, D.C.E.D.S.C., 120 F.Supp. 499. We agree that Rule 13 (h) is the applicable rule, and the motion will be treated as if based on that rule. We hold that the word “required” in Rule 13(h) does not limit joinder to “indispensable” or “necessary” parties, but includes parties whose presence would enable the court to grant complete relief to the defendants in the determination of the counterclaim. See Value Line Fund, Inc. v. Marcus, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 161 F.Supp. 533; S. P. A. Ricordi Officine Grafiche v. World Art Reproductions, Inc., D.C.S.D.N.Y. 22 F.R.D. 312. Cf. United Artists Corp. v. Masterpiece Productions, 2 Cir., 221 F.2d 213. Barron & Holtzoff, section 399; Moore, section 19.14(2). Accordingly, it is ordered that Donald F. Cutler, Jr., and Bay State Electronics Corporation be brought in as defendants to the counterclaim.
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO 
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
    OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Alejandro Ochoa , Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Therapeutics Ltd. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1)
      the annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: September 8, 2017 /s/ Alejandro OchoaAlejandro OchoaChief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Pacific Therapeutics Ltd and will be retained by Pacific Therapeutics Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 3


---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jost Fischer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |                          
|-------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|August 3, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/ JOST FISCHER         
|               |  |  |  | Jost Fischer             
|               |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer  
|               |  |  |  | (Chief Executive Officer)

A signed original of
this written statement required by section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
salpietranoteextension.htm






  





  











  








December 15, 2011


 







John M. Salpietra


2693 Heights View Court


Rochester Hills, MI  48178







Re:  May 11, 2010 Promissory Note







Dear Mr. Salpietra:







This is to confirm our agreement to extend the due date of your Promissory Note to December 4, 2012.







If you agree, please indicate your acceptance in the space below and return to this letter to me.

















Very truly yours,












/s/ Robert G. Crockett


Robert G. Crockett


CEO







ACCEPTED AND AGREED:












/s/ John M. (“Pete”) Salpietra


John M. (“Pete”) Salpietra







24663 Mound Road, Warren MI  48091


586-486-5308  Fax:  586-486-5283


www.EcologyCoatings.com
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CALIPER LIFESCIENCES, INC.

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ThomasT. Higgins, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Companycertify, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|                                 | /s/    Thomas T. Higgins         |   |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                            | Thomas T. Higgins                                    |   |
|                            | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                            |                                                 |   |
| Date:   May  10, 2007 |                                                 |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michael Weiner, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of National General Holdings Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2014By:/s/ Michael WeinerMichael WeinerChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### CAPITAL CITY THEATRE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WARNER BROS. PICTURES, Inc. et al., Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 5579.

United States District Court N. D. New York.

March 2, 1956.

*211Jacob M. Olshansky, Albany, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Whalen, McNamee, Creble & Nichols, Albany, N. Y., Dwight, Royall, Harris, Koegel & Caskey, New York City, of counsel, for defendant TCF Film Corp.

FOLEY, District Judge.

Defendant, TCF Film Corporation, moves to dismiss this action for insufficiency of service of process upon it. Apparently, TCF Film Corporation was dissolved on December 1, 1952, and previously it was named Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, such name being changed formally to TCF Film Corporation on September 27,1952. The plaintiff uses the name Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation in its complaint, but admittedly as a New York corporation in dissolution.

There is no contradiction offered by the plaintiff to the affidavit of Pantages, upon whom service was made, that at the time of service he had no connection whatever with TCF Film Corporation or Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, nor did he occupy any of the positions outlined in Rule 4(d) (3) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., or New York Civil Practice Act, § 228.

The defense of insufficiency of process is set forth in the Sixth Defense of the Answer. The extension of time to answer and the filing of the answer before this motion does not bar the relief requested under Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules. See Keil Lock Co., Inc., v. Earle Hardware Manufacturing Co., D.C., 16 F.R.D. 388, and the authorities cited therein.

The motion is granted only under the provisions of Rule 12(d); the service of the summons and complaint is set aside and quashed as to this defendant and the complaint is dismissed as to it for lack of jurisdiction over the person by reason of ineffective service of process, and

It is so ordered.