[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43470-43482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19255]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

16 CFR Parts 1112 and 1229

[Docket No. CPSC-2015-0028]


Safety Standard for Infant Bouncer Seats

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Danny Keysar Child Product Safety Notification Act, 
section 104 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 
(CPSIA), requires the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission 
(Commission or CPSC) to promulgate consumer product safety standards 
for durable infant or toddler products. These standards are to be 
``substantially the same as'' applicable voluntary standards or more 
stringent than the voluntary standard, if the Commission determines 
that more stringent requirements would further reduce the risk of 
injury associated with the product. The Commission is issuing this 
final rule establishing a safety standard for infant bouncer seats 
(bouncer seats) in response to the direction of section 104(b) of the 
CPSIA. Additionally, the Commission is finalizing an amendment to its 
regulations regarding third party conformity assessment bodies to 
include safety standard for bouncer seats in the list of notice of 
requirements (NORs) issued by the Commission.

DATES: This rule will become effective March 19, 2018. The 
incorporation by reference of the publication listed in this rule is 
approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of March 19, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keysha Walker, Compliance Officer, 
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone: 301-504-6820; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f44584e43444a5d6f4c5f5c4c01484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e78c90868b8c8295a784979484c9808891">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background and Statutory Authority

    The CPSIA was enacted on August 14, 2008. Section 104(b) of the 
CPSIA requires the Commission to: (1) Examine and assess the 
effectiveness of voluntary consumer product safety standards for 
durable infant or toddler products, in consultation with 
representatives of consumer groups, juvenile product manufacturers, and 
independent child product engineers and experts; and (2) promulgate 
consumer product safety standards for durable infant and toddler 
products. Standards issued under section 104 are to be ``substantially 
the same as'' the applicable voluntary standards or more stringent than 
the voluntary standard, if the Commission determines that more 
stringent requirements would further reduce the risk of injury 
associated with the product.
    The term ``durable infant or toddler product'' is defined in 
section 104(f)(1) of the CPSIA as ``a durable product intended for use, 
or that may be reasonably expected to be used, by children under the 
age of 5 years,'' and the statute specifies twelve categories of 
products that are included in the definition, including walkers, 
carriers and various types of children's chairs. When issuing a 
regulation governing product registration under section 104, the 
Commission determined that an ``infant bouncer'' falls within the 
definition of a ``durable infant or toddler product.'' 74 FR 68668 
(Dec. 29, 2009); 16 CFR 1130.2(a)(15).
    On October 19, 2015, the Commission issued a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPR) for infant bouncer seats. 80 FR 63168. The NPR 
proposed to incorporate by reference the 2015 version of the voluntary 
standard, ASTM F2167 Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant 
Bouncer Seats (ASTM F2167), as a mandatory consumer product safety rule 
with several modifications to the content, format, and placement of 
warning labels and instructions, to strengthen the standard.
    In this document, the Commission is issuing a mandatory consumer 
product safety standard for bouncer seats. As required by section 
104(b)(1)(A), the Commission consulted with manufacturers, retailers, 
trade organizations, laboratories, consumer advocacy groups, 
consultants, and the public to develop this rule, largely through the 
ASTM process. Based on revisions to the voluntary standard since the 
NPR published, the final rule incorporates by reference the most recent 
voluntary standard for infant bouncer seats, developed by ASTM 
International, ASTM F2167-17, with two modifications related to warning 
label content and placement. These modifications strengthen the 
standard by requiring a more stringent warning to caregivers to use the 
restraints, even if an infant falls asleep in the bouncer, and requires 
the fall hazard warning to be placed on the upper seat back of the 
bouncer seat, to ensure that caregivers read and heed the warning. The 
Commission's more stringent requirements are intended to further reduce 
the risk of injury to infants that fall from, and with, bouncer seats, 
especially bouncer seats that are placed on an elevated surface.
    Additionally, the final rule amends the list of NORs issued by the 
Commission in 16 CFR part 1112 to include the standard for infant 
bouncer seats. Under section 14 of the CPSA, the Commission promulgated 
16 CFR part 1112 to establish requirements for accreditation of third 
party conformity assessment bodies (or testing laboratories) to test 
for conformity with a children's product safety rule. Amending part 
1112 adds an NOR for the infant bouncer seat standard to the list of 
children's product safety rules.

II. Product Description

A. Definition of ``Bouncer Seats''

    Section 1.2 of ASTM F2167-17 defines an ``infant bouncer seat'' as: 
``a freestanding product intended to support an occupant in a reclined 
position to facilitate bouncing by the occupant, with the aid of a 
caregiver or by other means.'' Additionally, section 1.2 states that 
infant bouncer seats are intended for ``infants who have not developed 
the ability to sit up unassisted (approximately 0 to 6 months of 
age).''

[[Page 43471]]

    Bouncer seats vary widely in style and complexity, but typically, 
bouncer seats consist of a cloth cover stretched over a wire or tubular 
frame. Wire frame bouncers have two designs. The forward bend design is 
constructed with the seating area supported from the front side of the 
product. The second wire frame design is a rear bend design. In the 
rear bend design, the seat is supported from the rear side of the 
product. Other bouncer designs are also currently available, including, 
but not limited to, products with individual wire legs, solid bases, 
and spring designs. These infant bouncer designs use different methods 
to support the seat and are intended for ``bouncing,'' as defined in 
ASTM F2167.
    All bouncer seats support the child in an inclined position, and 
some brands have adjustable seat backs. Various bouncer seat models 
include a ``soothing unit'' that vibrates or bounces the chair, and may 
play music or other sounds. Most bouncer seats also feature an 
accessory bar with attached toys that are, or at some point will be, 
within the child's reach. Most of the bouncer seat models examined by 
Commission staff provide a 3-point restraint system, consisting of wide 
cloth crotch restraints and short adjustable waist straps with plastic 
buckles. Only two models of bouncer seats reviewed by CPSC for the NPR 
employed upper body restraints. Many bouncer seat brands also include 
an ``infant insert,'' intended for use to support smaller babies. Tabs 
C and D, Staff Briefing Package: Infant Bouncer Seats Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking, dated September 30, 2015 (Staff NPR Briefing 
Package), available at: http://www.cpsc.gov/Global/Newsroom/FOIA/CommissionBriefingPackages/2015/ProposedRuleSafetyStandardforInfantBouncerSeatSeptember302.pdf.

B. Market Description

    For the final rule, staff identified 23 firms supplying infant 
bouncer seats to the U.S. market, with several firms moving into or out 
of the market since the NPR was published. The 23 identified firms 
primarily specialize in the manufacture and/or distribution of 
children's products, including durable nursery products. Eight of the 
23 known firms are domestic manufacturers and 8 are domestic importers. 
The remaining seven firms are foreign (four manufacturers, two 
importers, and one retailer).\1\ Tab C, Staff Briefing Package: Final 
Rule for Infant Bouncer Seats, dated August 23, 2017 (Staff Final Rule 
Briefing Package), available at: https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/Final-Rule-Safety-Standard-for-Infant-Bouncer-Seats-August-23-2017.pdf?ctmyMqMkYWQ1t3QN9DUXCDKnJQ5rKCX6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Staff categorized each firm using information from Dun & 
Bradstreet and ReferenceUSAGov, as well as firm Web sites.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Staff expects that the infant bouncer seats of 14 of these firms 
already comply with ASTM F2167 because the firms either: (1) Have their 
bouncers certified by the Juvenile Products Manufacturers Association 
(JPMA) (five firms); (2) claim compliance with the voluntary standard 
(eight firms); or (3) have been tested to the ASTM standard by CPSC 
staff (one firm).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ JPMA typically allows six months for products in their 
certification program to shift to a new standard once it is 
published. Therefore, firms are likely already complying with ASTM 
F2167-16, which was published in May 2016. Firms are not expected to 
comply with the recently published ASTM F2167-17 until December 
2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Incident Data

    For the NPR, CPSC's Directorate for Epidemiology, Division of 
Hazard Analysis, described 277 reported incidents involving bouncer 
seats, including 11 fatalities and 51 injuries, occurring between 
January 1, 2006 and February 2, 2015. The incidents described in the 
NPR were based on reports involving victims 12 months old and younger 
in the Injury or Potential Injury Incident (IPII), In-Depth 
Investigation (INDP), and Death Certificates (DTHS) databases 
(collectively referred to as Consumer Product Safety Risk Management 
System data, or CPSRMS data). A detailed discussion of the incidents 
and hazard patterns developed for the NPR can be found in Tab A of the 
Staff NPR Briefing Package.

A. CPSRMS Data

    For the final rule, CPSC staff reviewed bouncer seat incident 
reports in CPSRMS from February 2, 2015 through July 6, 2016. CPSC 
staff found 70 incident reports in addition to those discussed in the 
NPR, including one fatality and three injuries. The fatality involved a 
4-month-old female who died after suffering a fractured skull injury 
when the infant bouncer she was seated in fell from a table. Two of the 
reported injuries were head contusions. A 5-month-old male sustained a 
head contusion when a bouncer seat bent backward to the floor. A 6-
month-old male sustained a head contusion when a bouncer cover came off 
of the wire frame and the infant flipped forward, striking his head on 
the battery compartment. In another reported incident, the victim 
suffered minor leg burns from a hot metal bar under a bouncer cover. 
Tab A, Staff Final Rule Briefing Package.
    Staff did not identify any hazards in the updated incident data 
that were not included in the hazard patterns described in the NPR 
(product design, structural integrity, toy bar-related, stability, 
chemical/electric hazards, restraints, hazardous environment), which 
specifically identified product design and structural integrity as the 
top two product-related hazards (in terms of frequency of occurrence). 
Staff found that product design and structural integrity continue to be 
the top two product-related hazards (in terms of frequency) for the 
updated CPSRMS data. Of the 70 new incident reports involving bouncer 
seats, 51 incident reports described issues with product design, and 13 
incident reports described issues with structural integrity. Staff 
determined that almost all of the issues with product design were 
related to lopsided or low-riding bouncer frames. Data for the final 
rule can be found in Tab A of the Staff Final Rule Briefing Package.

B. NEISS Data

    For the NPR, CPSC staff found 672 bouncer-related incidents, 
including two fatalities, reported in the National Electronic Injury 
Surveillance System (NEISS) records retrieved for bouncer incidents 
from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2013, involving children 12 months 
old and younger. Staff found that 385 cases, or an estimated 9,200 
injuries, occurred in hazardous environments (counters, tables, and 
other elevated surfaces).
    Staff updated information on bouncer-related incidents from the 
NEISS records for the final rule. From January 1, 2014 through December 
31, 2015, staff found 202 additional NEISS records describing infant 
bouncer incidents. Staff's inspection of the updated NEISS data 
revealed that 100 cases, or an estimated 2,800 injuries, took place in 
hazardous environments. The remaining 102 cases, or an estimated 2,800 
injuries, took place on the floor or an unknown location. Staff found 
no additional fatalities in the NEISS data during this time frame. 
Staff estimates that 4,700 (85%) bouncer injuries involved the head and 
face.

               Estimated NEISS Bouncer Injuries, 2006-2015
                                [age 0-1]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Estimated
                     Year                          Cases       injuries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006..........................................           67        1,400

[[Page 43472]]

 
2007..........................................           66        1,700
2008..........................................           74        1,600
2009..........................................           86        2,200
2010..........................................           94        2,300
2011..........................................          121        3,400
2012..........................................           90        2,500
2013..........................................           74        2,100
2014..........................................           98        2,900
2015..........................................          104        2,700
                                               -------------------------
    2006-2015.................................          877       22,800
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Based on the annual estimates provided in the table, staff found a 
statistically significant upward trend (p-value of 0.006) in the 
estimated emergency department-treated injuries involving bouncers for 
victims under 1-year-old from 2006 to 2015.

IV. Product Recalls

    The NPR described two recalls of infant bouncer seats since January 
2006, involving two different firms, one recall in April 2007 \3\ 
(involving breakage of a tubular steel frame) and another recall in 
July 2009 \4\ (involving small, sharp metal objects that could protrude 
through the bouncer fabric). No injuries were associated with either 
product at the time of the recall. See Tab E, Staff NPR Briefing 
Package. For the final rule, staff reports that no additional recalls 
involving bouncer seats have occurred.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ CPSC link to recalled product: http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Recalls/2007/Infant-Bouncer-Seats-Recalled-Due-to-Frame-Failure/.
    \4\ CPSC link to recalled product: http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Recalls/2009/BabySwede-LLC-Recalls-Bouncer-Chairs-Due-to-Laceration-Hazard/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Overview and Assessment of ASTM F2167

A. Overview

    The voluntary standard for infant bouncer seats, ASTM F2167, 
Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Bouncer Seats, is 
intended to minimize the risk of injury or death to infants in bouncer 
seats associated with falls from elevated surfaces, product disassembly 
or collapse, stability, and suffocation. ASTM F2167 was first approved 
in December 2001, and the standard published in January 2002. Since 
then, ASTM has revised the standard 11 times. Tab C of the Staff NPR 
Briefing Package includes a description of these revisions through 
2015.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Prior to the NPR publishing in October 2015, ASTM F2167 was 
revised several times as part of the rulemaking consultation 
process. In February 2014 (ASTM F2167-14) the standard was revised 
to improve the sideward and rearward stability tests. Additionally 
in 2014, ASTM F2167-14a included changes to the stability test to 
make the ASTM standard more strict, to address tip-over incidents, 
and to add requirements and test procedures to address incidents 
involving battery leakage, corrosion, and overheating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    More recently, in May 2016, ASTM revised the standard to add 
specific developmental guidance for caregivers about when to stop using 
the bouncer, and ASTM removed a general requirement for banned toys or 
other articles because those requirements do not apply to infant 
bouncer seats. As discussed below, the standard was subsequently 
revised in June of 2017 to incorporate changes recommended by ASTM's Ad 
Hoc Task Group \6\ concerning warning label formatting requirements, 
and to add a requirement that limits the maximum weight of an occupant 
in an infant bouncer seat. The June 2017 version of the voluntary 
standard also removed a requirement for manufacturers of bouncer seats 
to change the model number whenever the product underwent a significant 
structural or design modification. We agree with ASTM that although 
changing the model number represents a best practice, most ASTM 
standards do not include the statement, and such practice does not 
impact the safety of the product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Ad Hoc Task Group was formed by ASTM and consists of 
members of the various voluntary standards groups whose standards 
are affected by the durable nursery product rules. The purpose of 
the Ad Hoc Task Group is to harmonize the wording and warning label 
format of durable infant and toddler products. Ad Hoc Task Group 
recommendations for warning statements were originally published as 
a reference document titled, ``Ad Hoc Wording--May 4, 2016,'' as 
part of the F15 Committee Documents, and subsequently, the 
recommendations were revised and published in October 2016, with the 
title, ``Ad Hoc Approved Wording, Revision A--October 17, 2016'' (Ad 
Hoc Approved Wording).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Assessment of the Voluntary Standard

    For the NPR, CPSC staff examined the relationship between the 
performance requirements in ASTM F2167-15 and each of the hazard 
patterns staff identified in the incident data for bouncer seats. Tab 
C, Staff NPR Briefing Package. Based on staff's assessment, the 
Commission issued the NPR proposing to incorporate ASTM F2167-15 with 
the following modifications to warnings content, placement, and format:
    <bullet> Revised content of the warnings, markings, and 
instructions:
--Modify text in the warnings stating to use the restraints ``even if 
baby is sleeping'';
--change the text in the warnings to read, ``stop using when baby 
starts trying to sit up''; and
--change the developmental guidance in the instructions, if stated, to 
read: ``from birth (or ``0'') until baby starts trying to sit up.''

    <bullet> Restricted the fall hazard label on the front surface of 
the bouncer to be adjacent to the area where the child's head would 
rest, and modified the visibility test to reflect this requirement.
    <bullet> Specified a standard format (including black text on a 
white background, table design, bullet points, and black border) for 
the warnings on the product and in the instructions.
    The most recent version of the voluntary standard for bouncer 
seats, ASTM F2167-17, was approved on June 1, 2017, and published in 
June 2017. ASTM F2167-17 includes modified and new performance and 
labeling requirements developed by ASTM in conjunction with 
stakeholders and CPSC staff on the ASTM subcommittee task group, to 
address the hazards associated with bouncer seats. ASTM F2167-17 
addresses several of the hazards identified by the Commission in the 
NPR. Accordingly, after reviewing and considering comments received in 
response to the NPR, as well as the work of the Ad Hoc Task Group, the 
Commission incorporates by reference ASTM F2167-17, with two 
modifications that were identified in the NPR related to warning 
content and warning placement, as the mandatory safety standard for 
infant bouncer seats. Below we assess ASTM F2167-17 and explain how it 
differs from what the Commission proposed.
1. Content of the Warnings, Markings, and Instructions
    The NPR proposed to incorporate by reference ASTM F2167-15, with 
modifications to warning, marking, and instruction requirements. ASTM 
F2167-15 advised caregivers: ``Always use restraints. Adjust to fit 
snugly.'' Based on the incident data that relate deaths to suffocation 
among unrestrained infants while they slept, and relate serious head 
injuries to unrestrained infants due to falls from bouncer seats that 
are placed on elevated surfaces and falls from bouncer seats that are 
being carried by caregivers, the Commission stated in the NPR that the 
voluntary standard was inadequate to address the risk of injury to 
infants from falls out of bouncer seats, or the risk of suffocation 
among unrestrained infants who are sleeping. In the NPR, the Commission 
proposed warning language stating: ``Adjust to fit snugly, even if baby 
is

[[Page 43473]]

sleeping.'' Tab D, Staff NPR Briefing Package.
    The newest version of the voluntary standard, ASTM F2167-17, still 
does not require a warning statement that caregivers should use the 
restraints, even if an infant is asleep. We disagree with this 
approach. We note that some NPR commenters were concerned by the 
addition of language to the product warnings regarding sleep because 
such language may suggest that bouncer seats are intended to be used 
for long-term, unattended, sleep. However, CPSC staff advises that 
young infants, such as those who are intended to use bouncer seats, 
spend more time asleep than awake.\7\ Infants spending more than brief 
periods in a bouncer seat will fall asleep on occasion (and caregivers 
will place infants to sleep in bouncer seats under some circumstances), 
just as infants will fall asleep in strollers, swings, and car-seat 
carriers. It may be counterintuitive, and therefore unlikely to occur 
to consumers, that products made for infants' use, especially those 
that have features intended to sooth and comfort infants, would be 
unsafe places for infants to sleep. In fact, despite claims that 
bouncer seats are not intended for children to sleep in, CPSC staff 
found that some manufacturers' marketing suggests that bouncers are 
intended for sleep as well as play. Moreover, incident data and Health 
Sciences' assessment demonstrate that the severity of injury from a 
fall from a bouncer seat increases for a child who is unrestrained. 
Accordingly, in the final rule, the Commission requires that the fall 
hazard warning state that caregivers should use the restraints, even if 
baby falls asleep.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For example, see the American Academy of Pediatrics Web 
site, http://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/baby/sleep/Pages/default.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on staff's recommendation and the work of the Ad Hoc Task 
Group, the final rule uses the phrase ``falls asleep'' instead of the 
phrase ``is sleeping'' that the Commission had proposed in the NPR. 
This change aligns with wording approved by the Ad Hoc Task Group, 
which is ``Never leave child unattended, even if child falls asleep.'' 
The Ad Hoc Task Group intends for this warning to be used on products 
for infants who are likely to fall asleep in the product, but which are 
not intended for periods of unattended sleep (i.e. bouncers, swings, 
infant rockers, and handheld carriers).\8\ The Commission notes that 
the final rule does not preclude manufacturers from including an 
additional statement indicating that bouncers are not intended for long 
term sleep. Accordingly, the required fall and suffocation warning 
label text regarding use of restraints for the final rule is:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ During the April 2017 ASTM meetings, several Ad Hoc Task 
Group members requested the removal of this sentence from the Ad Hoc 
recommendations because no subcommittee had adopted the sentence. In 
the discussions, some manufacturers stated that these products are 
not appropriate for sleep, stating that the language ``even if baby 
falls asleep,'' may mislead caregivers. The Ad Hoc Group balloted 
the removal of the sentence in June 2017; however, the ballot 
received multiple negative votes and did not pass.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Always use restraints and adjust to fit snugly, even if 
baby falls asleep.
    ASTM F2167-17 includes the other modifications the Commission had 
proposed for warning statement requirements. Specifically, sections 
8.5.2.1 and 9.2.1 Fig. 11 of ASTM F2167-17 requires text in the 
warnings to state: ``stop using when baby starts trying to sit up.'' 
ASTM F2167-17 requires additional text in the suffocation hazard 
warning label to limit the maximum weight for an occupant in an infant 
bouncer seat. The rationale for ASTM's change is based on surveillance 
of the marketplace, which demonstrated that some manufacturers have 
weight limits that do not correlate to the developmental milestones 
contemplated in the current warnings. Section 8.5.2.1 of ASTM F2167-17 
requires text in the warnings to instruct caregivers to: ``STOP using 
bouncer when baby starts trying to sit up or has reached [insert 
manufacturer's recommended maximum weight, not to exceed 20 lb], 
whichever comes first.''
2. Warning Label Placement and Visibility Test
    The NPR proposed a modification to ASTM F2167-15's requirement for 
label placement. ASTM F2167-15 required that the fall hazard label be 
placed on the front surface of the bouncer seat back so that it is 
visible when a newborn CAMI dummy is placed in the bouncer seat. In the 
NPR, the Commission assessed this provision of the voluntary standard 
and found that it did not adequately address the risk of injury to 
infants falling from bouncer seats placed on elevated surfaces, a 
foreseeable misuse of infant bouncer seats. Tab D, Staff NPR Briefing 
Package. To strengthen the standard and further reduce the risk of 
injury, the NPR proposed that the fall hazard warning label be on the 
front surface of the bouncer seat, adjacent to where the child's head 
would rest, and the NPR also modified the visibility test. ASTM F2167-
17 retains the fall hazard warning placement and corresponding 
visibility test from ASTM F2167-15. Thus, the current voluntary 
standard still does not address the Commission's concern about the 
visibility of the fall hazard warning.
    NPR Commenters expressed concern that some products were designed 
with insufficient space in the area adjacent to the child's head to 
accommodate the necessary warning labels. Commenters were also 
concerned about the repeatability of the visibility test proposed in 
the NPR. We note, however, that staff's research on the seat back 
space, including models with narrow seat backs, did not corroborate the 
commenters' concerns. Nevertheless, to enhance test repeatability and 
to address the comments regarding insufficient seat back space for 
warning labels, the final rule allows a larger area for warning label 
placement than proposed in the NPR and clarifies the corresponding 
visibility test.
    The visibility test in the final rule is based on ASTM F2167-17. 
Using the CAMI dummy, as shown in Figure 1 below, the allowable area 
for warning label placement starts from a dotted line that crosses the 
junctions of underarm and both sides of the torso of the CAMI dummy.

[[Page 43474]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE17.000

This observable line expands the seat back space allowed for warning 
labels and clarifies the precision of the visibility test, both of 
which address commenter concerns.
3. Warning Label Format
    The NPR proposed modifications to the requirements in ASTM F2167-15 
regarding the format of warning labels noting that ASTM F2167-15 did 
not provide for a consistent warning label format across infant bouncer 
seats. Staff evaluated the warnings format in the voluntary standard 
and recommended that the Commission establish minimum requirements for 
presenting the hazard information that are consistent with best 
practices to attract and maintain attention, as well as aid reading and 
comprehension. Tab D, Staff NPR Briefing Package. Accordingly, the NPR 
proposed to specify a standard format (including black text on a white 
background, table design, bullet points, and black border) for the 
warnings on bouncer seats and in the instructions.
    Since the NPR published in 2015, ASTM's Ad Hoc Task Group issued 
recommendations regarding warnings intended to apply across juvenile 
products. These recommendations, based on ANSI Z535.4, American 
National Standard for Product Safety Signs and Labels, have been 
incorporated into ASTM F2167-17. The Commission notes that Human 
Factors staff regularly cites ANSI Z535.4 as a baseline in developing 
warning materials, including those proposed in the bouncer seat NPR. 
The approved Ad Hoc Task Group recommendations are very similar to the 
ANSI Z535.4, with modifications to make the recommendations more 
stringent. The recommendations provide noticeable and consistent 
warning labels on infant bouncer seats and across juvenile products. 
Accordingly, for the final rule, the Commission incorporates by 
reference ASTM F2167-17, without any modifications to the formatting 
provisions.

VI. Response to Comments

    CPSC received six comments in response to the NPR, including a 
joint letter submitted by four consumer advocacy groups. Three 
commenters supported the changes proposed in the NPR, and the remaining 
commenters expressed concern over the Commission's proposed 
modifications. We summarize and respond to the commenters below.

A. Warning Label Location

    Comment 1: One commenter stated that the proposed requirement for 
the fall hazard warning label to be adjacent to an infant's head would 
necessitate a wider seat back to accommodate a warning label in 
multiple languages, which is desirable for international sales. 
According to the same commenter, the ASTM F15.21 Subcommittee had 
already evaluated this location and concluded that other locations 
above and below the infant's head were considered to be just as visible 
as the locations adjacent to an infant's head. A second commenter 
stated that the proposed fall hazard label visibility test procedure is 
not specific and can be misinterpreted by test labs. This commenter 
suggested using the test protocol in the current ASTM standard that 
uses the CAMI newborn dummy.
    Response 1: Based on the incident data and research, the final rule 
requires that the fall hazard warning label be placed near the child's 
face. This location allows caregivers to notice the label while making 
eye contact with the infant, and potentially creates mental images of 
the consequence (``skull fracture'') of not complying with the 
instructions because the warning label would be placed next to the body 
part at risk. Tab D, Staff NPR Briefing Package.
    Commenters claim that the area on the infant bouncer adjacent to an 
infant's head could be severely limited in some cases due to the design 
of the seat back and allowance needed for stitching tolerances. CPSC 
staff's research did not corroborate this claim. Tab D, Staff NPR 
Briefing Package. Accordingly, the NPR, 80 FR at 63179-80, invited 
commenters to provide information on costs and design changes that 
would be required if the label were required to be next to an infant's 
head. Staff reports that during the ASTM Ad Hoc Task Group meetings 
held in January and February 2016, manufacturers provided several 
examples of juvenile products, including infant bouncer seats, to 
demonstrate difficulties associated with warning label placement in 
proposed

[[Page 43475]]

locations. However, NPR commenters provided neither cost estimates, nor 
specific comments, other than stating that the location would require a 
wider seat back and would limit representing multiple languages.
    To resolve concerns about the amount of space for warning label 
placement and address the Commission's concern about an effective 
warning label, the final rule states the test procedure language in 
ASTM F2167-17, but clarifies the allowable area for the fall hazard 
warning label. The fall hazard warning label must be visible when 
placed above an imaginary horizontal line that crosses through the 
junctions of underarm and side of the torso (armpits) on both left and 
right of the CAMI, and not obscured by any part of the dummy. A warning 
label located at or around the infant's shoulders can address the 
visibility and caregiver motivational concerns expressed in the Human 
Factors staff memorandum for the NPR (Tab D), and also provide 
additional surface area to accommodate the recommended warning label.

B. Warning Label Format

    Comment 2: Two commenters recommended against the proposed 
formatting requirements. Commenters specifically highlighted the 
following proposed warning formatting requirements:
    <bullet> A heavy black border around the label,
    <bullet> Delineating message panels with solid lines,
    <bullet> Black text on white message panel,
    <bullet> Bullet points preceding precautionary statements,
    <bullet> Choosing a background color for the signal word panel 
based on a best contrast against the product material, and
    <bullet> Using non-condensed style font.
    Commenters stated that, in general, ASTM standards provide 
flexibility to manufacturers to pick colors and formatting features 
that are most appropriate for the product. One commenter recommended 
delaying the publication of the final rule for any and all warnings 
requirements until the warnings format and content revisions proposed 
in the NPR can be reviewed by ASTM Ad Hoc Task Group, balloted through 
the ASTM process, and then implemented into F2167. The same commenter 
also indicated that the formatting requirements in the bouncer NPR and 
several other NPRs are inconsistent with each other.
    Response 2: Human Factors staff at CPSC employs the ANSI Z535.4, 
American National Standard for Product Safety Signs and Labels as a 
baseline to develop warning materials. Since the NPR was published, the 
ASTM Ad Hoc Task Group met and made recommendations for warning label 
formatting across juvenile products. The ASTM Ad Hoc Task Group's 
recommendations are based on ANSI Z535.4 and are more stringent than 
the ANSI Z535 series. ASTM 2167-17 now incorporates recommendations 
made by the Ad Hoc Task Group. Accordingly, the final rule incorporates 
by reference ASTM 2167-17 without any modifications to warning label 
format.

C. Warning Label Content

    Comment 3: Two commenters recommended against the proposed addition 
of ``even if baby is sleeping'' to the end of the precautionary 
statement: ``Always use restraints. Adjust to fit snugly.'' One 
commenter believes that this statement implies that sleeping in a 
bouncer is acceptable and may encourage caregivers to use the product 
for extended periods of sleep. The second commenter believes that this 
statement contradicts the warning to never leave children unattended.
    Response 3: Incident data associated with bouncer seats demonstrate 
that unrestrained infants suffer serious head injuries from falls and 
get into compromised positions that may result in suffocation. Tab A, 
Staff NPR Briefing Package; Tab A, Staff Final Rule Briefing Package. 
Young infants will sleep in bouncers as they spend more time asleep 
than awake. Tab D, Staff NPR Briefing Package. Some bouncers in the 
market include references to calming and soothing features of a 
bouncer, as well as appropriateness for short periods of sleep in a 
bouncer, such as ``Your child can also sleep for short periods of time 
in the bouncer if he or she is content doing so.'' Based on incident 
data, the final rule requires that the warning statement reference 
sleep to reflect this foreseeable product use scenario and to address 
the risk of injury from falls.
    In October 2016, the ASTM Ad Hoc Task Group approved a recommended 
warning to address products likely to be used for short-term sleep.\9\ 
The Commission agrees with the Ad Hoc Task Group's language and has 
modified the warning in the final rule to use the phrase ``even if 
child falls asleep'' to align with the Ad Hoc Task Group's language. 
Manufacturers who produce bouncers in which infants should not be 
allowed to sleep may add language to their warnings statements alerting 
caregivers to this issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The recommended wording is as follows: ``Products likely to 
be used for infants who are sleeping (i.e., bouncers, swings, infant 
rockers, handheld carriers) that are not intended for periods of 
unattended sleep, would benefit from this warning about unattended 
use. Never leave child unattended, even if child falls asleep.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comment 4: One commenter recommended that the ASTM subcommittee 
reach a consensus on the need for the additional proposed language: 
``Stop using bouncer when baby starts trying to sit up.''
    Response 4: At the January 12, 2016 ASTM meeting, the F15.18 
subcommittee on Infant Bouncer Seats reviewed and agreed with the 
Commission's proposed language on developmental guidance. ASTM balloted 
and approved the proposed language, and such language has been included 
in ASTM F2167 since the 2016 version of the standard.

D. Other Warning Label Issues

    Comment 5: Two commenters recommended that the warning label be 
attached on the product using embroidery or stamping to increase its 
permanency.
    Response 5: The ASTM standard does not require a certain type of 
attachment for labels but requires the labels to be tested per section 
7.8 to determine the labels' permanency. A similar permanency test 
procedure is used in other ASTM standards. No data were provided by the 
commenter, and the Commission has no information suggesting that these 
requirements are ineffective. Accordingly, the Commission incorporates 
by reference ASTM F2167-17, without any modification to section 7.8.
    Comment 6: Three commenters recommended using pictures to clarify 
warning messages.
    Response 6: The Commission acknowledges that well-designed graphics 
can be useful to increase the noticeability of the warnings as they 
help capture a user's attention. Pictograms are also helpful for users 
with limited or no English literacy. However, the design of effective 
graphics can be difficult. To avoid confusing consumers, a warning 
pictogram should be developed with an empirical study and well tested 
on the target audience. Although the Commission may take action in the 
future if it believes graphic symbols are needed to reduce the risk of 
injury associated with bouncer seats, the rule permits, but does not 
mandate, such supporting graphics.

VII. Incorporation by Reference

    Section 1229.2(a) of the final rule provides that infant bouncer 
seats must comply with applicable sections of

[[Page 43476]]

ASTM F2167-17. The OFR has regulations concerning incorporation by 
reference. 1 CFR part 51. These regulations require that, for a final 
rule, agencies must discuss in the preamble to the rule the way in 
which materials that the agency incorporates by reference are 
reasonably available to interested persons, and how interested parties 
can obtain the materials. Additionally, the preamble to the rule must 
summarize the material. 1 CFR 51.5(b).
    In accordance with the OFR's requirements, the discussion in 
section VIII of this preamble summarizes the required provisions of 
ASTM F2167-17. Interested persons may purchase a copy of ASTM F2167-17 
from ASTM, either through ASTM's Web site, or by mail at the address 
provided in the rule. A copy of the standard may also be inspected at 
the CPSC's Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety 
Commission, as discussed above. Note that the Commission and ASTM 
arranged for commenters to have ``read only'' access to ASTM F2167-15 
during the NPR's comment period.

VIII. Description of the Final Rule

    Section 1229.2(a) of the final rule for infant bouncer seats 
incorporates by reference ASTM F2167-17 with two modifications, as 
stated in Sec.  1229.2(b), related to the content and placement of 
warnings. Section 1229.2(a) includes the following key provisions 
summarized below: scope, terminology, general requirements, performance 
requirements, test methods, marking and labeling, and instructional 
literature. As described below, Sec.  1229.2(b) includes modifications 
to test methods (Sec.  1229.2(b)(1)), marking and labeling (Sec.  
1229.2(b)(2) and (3)), and instructional literature (Sec.  
1229.2(b)(4)).
    Scope. Section 1 of ASTM F2167-17 states the scope of the standard, 
detailing what constitutes an ``infant bouncer seat.'' As stated in 
section II.A of this preamble, the Scope section defines an ``infant 
bouncer seat'' as ``a freestanding product intended to support an 
occupant in a reclined position to facilitate bouncing by the occupant, 
with the aid of a caregiver or by other means.'' ASTM F2167-17 states 
that infant bouncer seats are intended for ``infants who have not 
developed the ability to sit up unassisted (approximately 0 to 6 months 
of age).''
    Terminology. Section 3 of ASTM F2167-17 provides definitions of 
terms specific to this standard.
    General Requirements. Section 5 of ASTM F2167-17 addresses numerous 
hazards with several general requirements, most of which are also found 
in the other ASTM juvenile product standards. Several requirements 
reference an existing CPSC standard. The following general requirements 
apply to bouncer seats. Where the ASTM standard relies on a CPSC 
mandatory standard, the mandatory standard is cited in parentheses next 
to the requirement:
    <bullet> Hazardous sharp points and edges (16 CFR 1500.48 and 
1500.49);
    <bullet> Small parts (16 CFR part 1501);
    <bullet> Lead in paint (16 CFR part 1303);
    <bullet> Wood parts;
    <bullet> Latching and locking mechanisms;
    <bullet> Scissoring, shearing, and pinching;
    <bullet> Openings;
    <bullet> Exposed coil springs;
    <bullet> Protective components;
    <bullet> Permanency of labels and warnings; and
    <bullet> Toys (ASTM F963).
    Performance Requirements and Test Methods. Sections 6 and 7 of ASTM 
F2167-17 contain performance requirements specific to bouncer seats, as 
well as test methods that must be used to assess conformity with such 
requirements. Accordingly, the final rule includes performance 
requirements for the following:
    <bullet> Restraints;
    <bullet> Stability (forward, sideward, and rearward);
    <bullet> Slip Resistance
    <bullet> Structural Integrity;
    <bullet> Dynamic and Static Load;
    <bullet> Disassembly/Collapse;
    <bullet> Drop Test;
    <bullet> Toy Bar Attachment Integrity; and
    <bullet> Battery Compartment.
    Additionally, section 7 of ASTM F2167-17 includes test procedures 
to ensure the permanency of labels and warnings, and a fall hazard 
visibility test. The test procedure in Sec.  1229.2(b)(1) of the final 
rule replaces the fall hazard visibility test in section 7.11.3.1 of 
ASTM F2167-17, as described in section V.B.2 of this preamble.
    Marking and Labeling. Section 8 of ASTM F2167-17 requires products 
to be marked or labeled with manufacturing information and relevant 
product warnings. Warning label requirements for bouncer seats in 
section 8.4.5 of ASTM F2167-17 require two groups of warning 
statements, a fall hazard warning and a suffocation warning. ASTM 
F2167-17 includes warning language and formatting requirements for both 
falls and suffocation warnings. Section 8.4.7.1 requires the fall 
hazard warning to be placed on the front surface of the infant bouncer 
seat back, so that it complies with the visibility requirement in 
section 7.11.
    Section 1229.2(b)(2) of the final rule replaces the content of the 
fall hazard warning in section 8.5.1.1 of ASTM F2167-17. Section 
1229.3(b)(3) of the final rule replaces the content of the suffocation 
hazard warning in sections 8.5.2.1 and 8.5.3 in ASTM F2167-17. Changes 
to warning content and the visibility test for the placement of the 
fall hazard warning are outlined in section V.B.1-2 of this preamble.
    Instructional Literature. Section 9 of ASTM F2167-17 requires that 
instructions be provided with bouncer seats and be easy to read and 
understand. Additionally, the section contains requirements relating to 
instructional literature contents, including warnings.
    Section 1229.2(b)(4) of the final rule replaces the content of 
sections 9.2.1 and 9.2.2 of ASTM F2167-17. These sections contain 
example warning labels or references to example warning labels. The 
content of the example warning labels in Sec.  1229.2(b)(4) reflects 
changes to the content of the fall hazard warning and suffocation 
hazard warning in Sec.  1229.2(b)(2) and (3) of the final rule. Changes 
to the instructional literature that relate to warnings content are 
outlined in section V.B.1-2 of this preamble.

IX. Effective Date

    The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) generally requires that the 
effective date of a rule be at least 30 days after publication of the 
final rule. 5 U.S.C. 553(d). CPSC generally considers 6 months to be 
sufficient time for suppliers of durable infant and toddler products to 
come into compliance with a new standard under section 104 of the 
CPSIA. Six months is also the period that the Juvenile Products 
Manufacturers Association (JPMA) typically allows for products in the 
JPMA certification program to transition to a new standard once that 
standard is published. The Commission proposed a 6-month effective date 
in the NPR for infant bouncer seats and we received no comments on the 
proposed effective date. Accordingly, the final rule for bouncer seats, 
as well as the amendment to part 1112, has a 6-month effective date.

X. Regulatory Flexibility Act

A. Introduction

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, requires 
that agencies review a proposed rule and a final rule for the rule's 
potential economic impact on small entities, including small 
businesses. Section 604 of the RFA generally requires that agencies 
prepare a final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) when 
promulgating final rules,

[[Page 43477]]

unless the head of the agency certifies that the rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Staff prepared a FRFA that is available at Tab C of the Staff Final 
Rule Briefing Package. We provide a summary of the FRFA below.
    The final rule is unlikely to have a significant economic impact on 
the five domestic manufacturers of infant bouncer seats. Of the six 
small importers, a significant economic impact cannot be ruled out for 
four of the importers, either as a result of the final rule 
requirements or the resulting third party testing costs. Therefore, the 
Commission cannot rule out a significant economic impact for four of 
the 11 firms (36 percent) operating in the U.S. market for bouncers.

B. The Product

    An infant bouncer seat is defined in ASTM F2167-17, Standard 
Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Bouncer Seats, as ``a 
freestanding product intended to support an occupant in a reclined 
position to facilitate bouncing by the occupant, with the aid of a 
caregiver or by other means.'' These products vary widely in price; 
they can be purchased for as little as $20, but can also easily cost 
more than $200.

C. The Market for Infant Bouncer Seats

    For the FRFA, the Commission identified 23 firms supplying infant 
bouncer seats to the U.S. market, with several firms moving into or out 
of the market since the NPR. These firms primarily specialize in the 
manufacture and/or distribution of children's products, including 
durable nursery products. Eight of the 23 known firms are domestic 
manufacturers and eight are domestic importers. The remaining seven 
firms are foreign (4 manufacturers, 2 importers, and 1 retailer).\10\ 
We expect that the infant bouncer seats of 14 of these firms already 
comply with ASTM F2167 because the firms either: (1) Have their 
bouncers certified by JPMA (five firms); (2) claim compliance with the 
voluntary standard (eight firms); or (3) have been tested to the ASTM 
standard by CPSC staff (one firm).\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Staff categorized each firm using information from Dun & 
Bradstreet and ReferenceUSAGov, as well as firm Web sites.
    \11\ JPMA typically allows six months for products in their 
certification program to become compliant with a new voluntary 
standard once it is published. Therefore, firms are likely already 
complying with ASTM F2167-16, which was published in May 2016. They 
are not expected to comply with the recently published ASTM F2167-17 
until December 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Impact on Small Businesses

    The Commission is aware of approximately 23 firms currently 
marketing infant bouncer seats in the United States, 16 of which are 
domestic. Under U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) guidelines, a 
manufacturer of infant bouncer seats is categorized as small if it has 
500 or fewer employees, and importers and wholesalers are considered 
small if they have 100 or fewer employees. We have limited our analysis 
to domestic firms because SBA guidelines and definitions pertain to 
U.S.-based entities. Based on these guidelines, the Commission 
determined that about 11 of the 23 firms are small--five domestic 
manufacturers and six domestic importers. Additional unknown small 
domestic infant bouncer seat suppliers may be operating in the U.S. 
market.
1. Small Manufacturers
    The economic impact of the final rule for infant bouncer seats 
should be small for the five small domestic manufacturers. Each firm 
has an established history of compliance with the ASTM standard for 
infant bouncers and is therefore expected to be compliant with ASTM 
F2167-17, the version of the voluntary standard upon which the final 
rule is based, by the time the mandatory standard becomes final.
    None of these firms includes more than four languages in their 
warnings and redesign is not expected. Based upon staff's inspection of 
their products, we expect products to have more than sufficient space 
for the required warning labels under the modified warning label for 
the final rule without the products seeming cluttered.
    Under section 14 of the CPSA, once the new infant bouncer seat 
requirements become effective, all manufacturers will be subject to the 
third party testing and certification requirements under the CPSA and 
the Testing and Labeling Pertaining to Product Certification rule (16 
CFR part 1107) (1107 rule). Third party testing will include any 
physical and mechanical test requirements specified in the final infant 
bouncer seats rule. Manufacturers and importers should already be 
conducting required lead testing for bouncer seats.
    Third party testing costs are in addition to the direct costs of 
meeting the infant bouncer seats standard. The Initial Regulatory 
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) prepared for the NPR concluded that we 
could not rule out a significant economic impact, given that we do not 
know specifically how much the third party requirement adds to testing 
costs or precisely how many models are needed to meet the ``high degree 
of assurance'' standard but that it was unlikely to be economically 
significant for most small manufacturers (i.e., testing costs would be 
less than 1 percent of gross revenue). Given that these firms are 
already testing to the voluntary standard and the Commission received 
no public comments about third party testing, the Commission believes 
that it is unlikely that third party testing would have a significant 
economic impact on any of the five small manufacturers.
2. Small Importers
a. Small Importers With Compliant Infant Bouncer Seats
    As noted in the IRFA, imported bouncers tend to be produced to meet 
the requirements for several trading partners simultaneously, including 
their different labeling requirements. Producers for international 
markets typically address labeling requirements for their various 
trading partners by simply providing a warning that covers all required 
safety issues in multiple languages. Specificity regarding warning 
label location impacts the practicability of replicating the warning 
label in multiple languages. This could mean that foreign producers 
will need to design a product for the U.S. market or reduce the number 
of languages used for warnings on U.S.-bound bouncer seats.
    The final rule provides additional space for warning label 
placement than that proposed in the NPR. With this additional space, 
reducing on-product warning languages should be a more viable 
alternative for firms than it was under the NPR proposal. Firms would 
not need to reduce the number of languages for their on-product 
warnings for the final rule as significantly as that required in the 
NPR. The additional space addresses the location requirement in the 
final rule, while ensuring that the appearance of bouncers remains 
comparable to firms' competitor products (for which one to three 
languages is typical).
    Three small importers of infant bouncer seats are currently in 
compliance with the voluntary standard; these firms likely would 
continue compliance as new versions of the voluntary standard are 
published. One importer is unlikely to experience a significant 
economic impact, even if the importer opted to redesign its bouncers to 
accommodate more than eight warning label languages. The cost estimate 
to redesign an infant bouncer (based on information from several

[[Page 43478]]

firms) is between $200,000 and $300,000, which is less than 1 percent 
of this firm's revenue. The remaining two small importers of compliant 
bouncer seats might experience significant economic costs, based on the 
same comparison (i.e., $200,000 to $300,000 could represent more than 1 
percent of their annual revenue). Although the Commission does not 
expect that these firms would require space for warning labels in more 
than eight languages, we cannot rule out a significant economic impact 
for one of these two firms, given an extremely low revenue level 
compared to estimated costs for redesign. The second firm appears to 
have the option of exiting the bouncer market without experiencing a 
significant impact.
b. Small Importers With Noncompliant Infant Bouncer Seats
    Three firms import bouncers that do not comply with the voluntary 
standard. The bouncers for these firms will require changes to come 
into compliance with the voluntary standard as well as modifications to 
meet the warning label requirements in the final rule. In the absence 
of information on precisely what changes would be required to bring the 
bouncer seats supplied by all three firms into compliance with the 
final rule (as well as information on sales revenue for all three 
firms), the Commission cannot rule out a significant economic impact 
for any of these firms.
    The magnitude of the economic impact on the three firms with 
noncompliant infant bouncer seats will depend upon the cost of the 
changes required and the degree to which their supplying firms pass on 
any increases in production costs associated with changes to the 
product needed to meet the mandatory standard (a redesign is estimated 
to cost between $200,000 to $300,000). Two of the firms are directly 
tied to their foreign suppliers and therefore, finding an alternate 
supply source would not be a viable alternative. However, given this 
close relationship, it seems likely that their foreign suppliers would 
have an incentive to work with their U.S. subsidiaries to maintain an 
American market presence. One of those two firms likely would only 
avoid a significant economic impact if their supplier absorbed 100 
percent of the cost of a redesign. The third firm imports and 
wholesales a wide variety of children's products. We do not know, 
however, how much of the firm's revenue is due to bouncer sales and 
cannot determine what impact discontinuing bouncer sales might have on 
the third firm should the firm be unable to find a supplier of bouncers 
that comply with the standard.
    Based on the additional space provided in the final rule for 
placement of the fall hazard warning label, two of these firms should 
not require modifications to meet the requirement in the final rule 
(although they would have required modifications under the NPR).
c. Third Party Testing Costs for Small Importers
    As with manufacturers, all importers will be subject to third-party 
testing and certification requirements, and consequently, will be 
subject to costs similar to those for manufacturers if their supplying 
foreign firm(s) does not perform third party testing. Half of the 
bouncer seat importers (3 of 6) are already testing their products to 
verify compliance with the ASTM standard, and any costs would be 
limited to the incremental costs associated with third party testing 
over the current testing regime.
    The Commission was able to obtain revenue data for one of the small 
importers with noncompliant bouncers. For that importer, third party 
testing costs, considered alone and apart from any additional 
performance requirements due to the final rule, would not exceed one 
percent of gross revenue unless around 12 units per model required 
testing to provide the ``high degree of assurance'' required by 16 CFR 
part 1107. The Commission has no basis for estimating the size of the 
impact for the remaining two importers of noncompliant bouncers.

E. Summary of Impacts

    The Commission is aware of 11 small firms, five domestic 
manufacturers and six domestic importers, currently marketing infant 
bouncer seats in the United States. With regards to the five domestic 
manufacturers, the Commission considers it unlikely that testing costs 
would have a significant impact on any of these firms. Of the six small 
importers, a significant economic impact cannot be ruled out for four 
of the importers either as a result of the final rule requirements or 
the resulting third party testing costs. Therefore, the Commission 
cannot rule out a significant economic impact for four of the 11 firms 
(36 percent) operating in the U.S. market for bouncers.

F. Alternatives

    One of the alternatives to reduce the impact on small entities 
discussed in the NPR was to adopt the voluntary standard with all of 
the modifications to the on-product warning labels, except for the 
location specificity (i.e., next to the child's head). Based on 
comments received, the requirements regarding on-product warning label 
placement have been modified in the final rule (i.e., up from the 
child's armpits on either side). This modification provides additional 
room and will reduce the economic impact of the warning label location 
specificity on small suppliers. The Commission could further reduce the 
economic impact on small entities by eliminating the location 
requirement for the fall hazard warning entirely. However, this would 
reduce the effectiveness of the fall hazard warning label. The location 
for the fall hazard warning ``allows caregivers to notice the label 
while making eye contact with the infant, and potentially creates 
mental images of the consequence (``skull fracture'') of not complying 
with the instructions . . .'' Tab D, Staff NPR Briefing Package; Tab B, 
Staff Final Rule Briefing Package.
    The Commission considered two additional alternatives discussed in 
the NPR that might minimize the economic impact on small entities: (1) 
Adopt ASTM F2167-17 with no modifications; and (2) allow a later 
effective date.
    Section 104 of the CPSIA requires that the Commission promulgate a 
standard that is either substantially the same as the voluntary 
standard or more stringent. Therefore, adopting ASTM F2167-17 with no 
modifications is the least stringent rule allowed by law. This 
alternative would reduce the impact on all of the known small 
businesses supplying infant bouncers to the U.S. market. If it were 
adopted, it should eliminate any economic impact related to warning 
label changes, but firms would continue to be affected by third party 
testing requirements. However, adopting ASTM F2167-17 without 
modification would not adequately address the fall hazard scenario 
identified in the incident data and would reduce the effectiveness of 
the fall hazard warning label.
    Finally, the Commission could reduce the final rule's impact on 
small businesses by setting a later effective date. A later effective 
date would reduce the economic impact on firms in two ways. Firms would 
be less likely to experience a lapse in production/importation, which 
could result if they are unable to comply and third party test within 
the required timeframe. Also, firms could spread costs over a longer 
time period, thereby reducing their annual costs, as well as the 
present value of their total costs. However, the Commission received no 
comments asserting that firms would not have sufficient time to comply 
with the

[[Page 43479]]

proposed 6 month effective date. Accordingly, the Commission declines 
to extend the effective date of the final rule.

G. Small Business Impacts of the Accreditation Requirements for Testing 
Laboratories

    In accordance with section 14 of the CPSA, all children's products 
that are subject to a children's product safety rule must be tested by 
a CPSC-accepted third party conformity assessment body (i.e., testing 
laboratory) for compliance with applicable children's product safety 
rules. Testing laboratories that want to conduct this testing must meet 
the NOR pertaining to third party conformity testing. NORs have been 
codified for existing rules at 16 CFR part 1112. Consequently, the 
Commission finalizes an amendment to 16 CFR part 1112 that establishes 
an NOR for those testing laboratories that want to test for compliance 
with the bouncers final rule. This section assesses the impact of the 
amendment on small laboratories.
    A FRFA was conducted as part of the promulgation of the original 
1112 rule (78 FR 15836, 15855-58) as required by the RFA. Briefly, the 
FRFA concluded that the accreditation requirements would not have a 
significant adverse impact on a substantial number of small 
laboratories because no requirements were imposed on laboratories that 
did not intend to provide third party testing services. The only 
laboratories that were expected to provide such services were those 
that anticipated receiving sufficient revenue from the mandated testing 
to justify accepting the requirements as a business decision.
    Based on similar reasoning, amending the rule to include the NOR 
for the bouncer standard will not have a significant adverse impact on 
small laboratories. Moreover, based upon the number of laboratories in 
the United States that have applied for CPSC acceptance of the 
accreditation to test for conformance to other juvenile product 
standards, we expect that only a few laboratories will seek CPSC 
acceptance of their accreditation to test for conformance with the 
infant bouncer seat standard. Most of these laboratories will have 
already been accredited to test for conformance to other juvenile 
product standards, and the only costs to them would be the cost of 
adding the bouncer standard to their scope of accreditation, a cost 
that test laboratories have indicated is extremely low when they are 
already accredited for other section 104 rules. As a consequence, the 
Commission certifies that the NOR for the infant bouncer seat standard 
will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.

XI. Environmental Considerations

    The Commission's regulations address whether the agency is required 
to prepare an environmental assessment or an environmental impact 
statement. Under these regulations, a rule that has ``little or no 
potential for affecting the human environment,'' is categorically 
exempt from this requirement. 16 CFR 1021.5(c)(1). The final rule for 
bouncer seats falls within the categorical exemption.

XII. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The final rule for infant bouncer seats contains information 
collection requirements that are subject to public comment and review 
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The preamble to the 
proposed rule (80 FR at 63181-82) discussed the information collection 
burden of the proposed rule and specifically requested comments on the 
accuracy of our estimates. OMB has assigned control number 3041-0174 to 
this information collection. We did not receive any comment regarding 
the information collection burden of the proposal. However, the final 
rule makes modifications regarding the information collection burden 
because the number of estimated manufacturers subject to the 
information collection burden is now estimated at 23 manufacturers 
rather than the 22 manufacturers initially estimated in the proposed 
rule.
    Accordingly, the estimated burden of this collection of information 
is modified as follows:

                                                       Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        Number of       Frequency of     Total annual      Hours per       Total burden
                           16 CFR Section                              respondents       responses        responses         response          hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1229...............................................................              23                4               92                1               92
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our estimate is based on the following:
    Section 8.1 of ASTM F2167-17 requires that all infant bouncer seats 
and their retail packaging be permanently marked or labeled as follows: 
The manufacturer, distributor, or seller name, place of business (city, 
state, mailing address, including zip code), and telephone number; and 
a code mark or other means that identifies the date (month and year as 
a minimum) of manufacture.
    CPSC is aware of 23 firms that supply bouncer seats in the U.S. 
market. For PRA purposes, we assume that all 23 firms use labels on 
their products and on their packaging already. All firms will need to 
make some modifications to their existing labels. We estimate that the 
time required to make these modifications is about 1 hour per model. 
Each of the 23 firms supplies an average of four different models of 
bouncer seats. Therefore, we estimate the burden hours associated with 
labels to be 92 hours annually (1 hour x 23 firms x 4 models per firm = 
92 hours annually).
    We estimate the hourly compensation for the time required to create 
and update labels is $33.58 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 
``Employer Costs for Employee Compensation,'' March 2017, Table 9, 
total compensation for all sales and office workers in goods-producing 
private industries: http://www.bls.gov/ncs/). Therefore, we estimate 
the annual cost to industry associated with the labeling requirements 
in the final rule to be approximately $3,089 ($33.58 per hour x 92 
hours = $3,089.36). This collection of information does not require 
operating, maintenance, or capital costs.
    In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3507(d)), we have submitted the information collection requirements of 
this final rule to the OMB.

XIII. Preemption

    Section 26(a) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2075(a), provides that when a 
consumer product safety standard is in effect and applies to a product, 
no state or political subdivision of a state may either establish or 
continue in effect a requirement dealing with the same risk of injury 
unless the state requirement is identical to the federal standard. 
Section 26(c) of the CPSA also provides that states or political 
subdivisions of states may apply to the Commission for an exemption 
from this preemption under

[[Page 43480]]

certain circumstances. Section 104(b) of the CPSIA refers to the rules 
to be issued under that section as ``consumer product safety rules.'' 
Therefore, the preemption provision of section 26(a) of the CPSA 
applies to this final rule issued under section 104.

XIV. Amendment to 16 CFR Part 1112 To Include NOR for Bouncer Seat 
Standard

    The CPSA establishes certain requirements for product certification 
and testing. Products subject to a consumer product safety rule under 
the CPSA, or to a similar rule, ban, standard or regulation under any 
other act enforced by the Commission, must be certified as complying 
with all applicable CPSC-enforced requirements. 15 U.S.C. 2063(a). 
Certification of children's products subject to a children's product 
safety rule must be based on testing conducted by a CPSC-accepted third 
party conformity assessment body. Id. 2063(a)(2). The Commission must 
publish an NOR for the accreditation of third party conformity 
assessment bodies to assess conformity with a children's product safety 
rule to which a children's product is subject. Id. 2063(a)(3). The 
Safety Standard for Infant Bouncer Seats, to be codified at 16 CFR part 
1229, is a children's product safety rule that requires the issuance of 
an NOR.
    The Commission published a final rule, Requirements Pertaining to 
Third-Party Conformity Assessment Bodies, 78 FR 15836 (March 12, 2013), 
which is codified at 16 CFR part 1112 (referred to here as part 1112). 
Part 1112 became effective on June 10, 2013 and establishes 
requirements for accreditation of third-party conformity assessment 
bodies (or laboratories) to test for conformance with a children's 
product safety rule in accordance with section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA. 
Part 1112 also codifies a list of all of the NORs that the CPSC had 
published at the time part 1112 was issued. All NORs issued after the 
Commission published part 1112, such as the standard for bouncer seats, 
require the Commission to amend part 1112. Accordingly, the Commission 
is now amending part 1112 to include the standard for infant bouncer 
seats in the list of other children's product safety rules for which 
the CPSC has issued NORs.
    Laboratories applying for acceptance as a CPSC-accepted third-party 
conformity assessment body to test to the new standard for infant 
bouncer seats would be required to meet the third-party conformity 
assessment body accreditation requirements in 16 CFR part 1112, 
Requirements Pertaining to Third-Party Conformity Assessment Bodies. 
When a laboratory meets the requirements as a CPSC-accepted third-party 
conformity assessment body, the laboratory can apply to the CPSC to 
have 16 CFR part 1229, Safety Standard for Infant Bouncer Seats, 
included in its scope of accreditation of CPSC safety rules listed for 
the laboratory on the CPSC Web site at: www.cpsc.gov/labsearch.
    As required by the RFA, staff conducted a FRFA when the Commission 
issued the part 1112 rule (78 FR 15836, 15855-58). Briefly, the FRFA 
concluded that the accreditation requirements would not have a 
significant adverse impact on a substantial number of small test 
laboratories because no requirements were imposed on test laboratories 
that did not intend to provide third-party testing services. The only 
test laboratories that were expected to provide such services were 
those that anticipated receiving sufficient revenue from the mandated 
testing to justify accepting the requirements as a business decision. 
Moreover, a test laboratory would only choose to provide such services 
if it anticipated receiving revenues sufficient to cover the costs of 
the requirements.
    Based on similar reasoning, amending 16 CFR part 1112 to include 
the NOR for the infant bouncer seats standard will not have a 
significant adverse impact on small test laboratories. Moreover, based 
upon the number of test laboratories in the United States that have 
applied for CPSC acceptance of accreditation to test for conformance to 
other mandatory juvenile product standards, we expect that only a few 
test laboratories will seek CPSC acceptance of their accreditation to 
test for conformance with the infant bouncer seats standard. Most of 
these test laboratories will have already been accredited to test for 
conformity to other mandatory juvenile product standards, and the only 
costs to them would be the cost of adding the infant bouncer seats 
standard to their scope of accreditation. For these reasons, the 
Commission certifies that the NOR amending 16 CFR part 1112 to include 
the infant bouncer seats standard will not have a significant impact on 
a substantial number of small entities.

List of Subjects

16 CFR Part 1112

    Administrative practice and procedure, Audit, Consumer protection, 
Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Third party conformity assessment body.

16 CFR Part 1229

    Bouncer seats, Chairs, Consumer protection, Imports, Incorporation 
by reference, Infants and children, Labeling, Law enforcement, Seats, 
and Toys.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Commission amends 
title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 1112--REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO THIRD PARTY CONFORMITY 
ASSESSMENT BODIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 1112 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 2063; Pub. L. 110-314, section 3, 122 
Stat. 3016, 3017 (2008).


0
2. Amend Sec.  1112.15 by adding paragraph (b)(42) to read as follows:


Sec.  1112.15   When can a third party conformity assessment body apply 
for CPSC acceptance for a particular CPSC rule and/or test method?

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (42) 16 CFR part 1229, Safety Standard for Infant Bouncer Seats.
* * * * *

0
3. Add part 1229 to read as follows:

PART 1229--SAFETY STANDARD FOR INFANT BOUNCER SEATS

Sec.
1229.1 Scope.
1229.2 Requirements for infant bouncer seats.

    Authority:  Sec. 104, Pub. L. 110-314, 122 Stat. 3016 (15 U.S.C. 
2056a).


Sec.  1229.1   Scope.

    This part establishes a consumer product safety standard for infant 
bouncer seats.


Sec.  1229.2   Requirements for infant bouncer seats.

    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each 
infant bouncer seat must comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM 
F2167-17, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Bouncer 
Seats, approved on June 1, 2017. The Director of the Federal Register 
approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy from ASTM 
International, 100 Bar Harbor Drive, P.O. Box 0700, West Conshohocken, 
PA 19428; http://www.astm.org/cpsc.htm. You may inspect a copy at the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 
820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone 301-504-
7923, or at

[[Page 43481]]

the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For 
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    (b) Comply with ASTM F2167-17 with the following additions or 
exclusions:
    (1) Instead of complying with section 7.11.3.1 of ASTM F2167-17, 
comply with the following:
    (i) 7.11.3.1 Visibility With CAMI Dummy Restrained in Seat--While 
standing in front of the product with the Newborn CAMI dummy installed, 
verify that the required warnings are visible and placed above an 
imaginary horizontal line that crosses through the junctions of under 
arm and side of the torso armpits on both left and right and not 
obscured by any part of the dummy (as shown in paragraph (b)(1)(ii), 
``Fig. 10'').
    (ii) Fig. 10: CAMI Dummy Restrained in Seat; Allowable area for 
warning label placement starts from the dotted line that crosses the 
junctions of underarm and both sides of the torso.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE17.001

    (2) In section 8.5.1.1 of ASTM F2167-17, replace the warning 
statement ``ALWAYS use restraints. Adjust to fit snugly'' with ``ALWAYS 
use restraints and adjust to fit snugly, even if baby falls asleep.''
    (3) In section 8.5.2.1 of ASTM F2167-17, replace the warning 
statement ``ALWAYS use restraints. Adjust to fit snugly'' with ``ALWAYS 
use restraints and adjust to fit snugly, even if baby falls asleep.''
    (4) In section 8.5.3 of ASTM F2167-17, replace the reference to 
``Figs. 10 and 11'' with ``Figs. 11 and 12.''
    (5) In section 9.2.1 of ASTM F2167-17:
    (i) Replace the reference to ``Fig. 12'' with ``Fig. 13.''
    (ii) Replace Fig. 10 with paragraph (b)(5)(iii), ``Fig. 11''.
    (iii) Fig. 11: Fall Hazard Warning.
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE17.002
    

[[Page 43482]]


    (iv) Replace Fig. 11 with paragraph (b)(5)(v), ``Fig. 12''.
    (v) Fig. 12: Suffocation Hazard Warning.
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE17.003
    
    (vi) Replace Fig. 12 with paragraph (b)(5)(vii), ``Fig. 13''.
    (vii) Fig. 13: Instruction Warning Statements.
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18SE17.004
    
    (6) In section 9.2.2 of ASTM F2167-17, replace the reference to 
``Fig. 12'' with ``Fig. 13.''

Alberta E. Mills,
Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-19255 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6355-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>