alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 

TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement, dated February 26, 2008 and subsequently amended effective January 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”), by and
between Chart Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) and Michael F. Biehl (“Executive”), is effective January 1, 2012. 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the
Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties reserved the right to amend the Agreement pursuant to Section 13.c thereof.

 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 13.c of the Agreement, and effective as of January 1, 2012, the parties hereby
amend the Agreement as follows: 
 1. In Section 3 of the Agreement, delete the dollar amount
“$262,150” and replace with “$365,000”. 
 2. In Section 4 of the Agreement delete
the phrase “of one hundred percent (100%) of the Executive’s Base Salary (with it being understood that one hundred percent (100%) of the Executive’s Base Salary is the “Target”)” in its entirety and replace
it with “of ninety percent (90%) of the Executive’s Base Salary (with it being understood that ninety percent (90%) of the Executive’s Base Salary is the “Target”)”. 

3. Except as set forth herein, the Agreement is not modified or amended. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment. 

 

							
	CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.	 		 	MICHAEL F. BIEHL
	(“Company”)	 		 	(“Executive”)
				
	 By:
	 	/s/ Mark H. Ludwig	 		 	/s/ Michael F. Biehl
	 Name:
	 	Mark H. Ludwig	 		 	
	 Title:
	 	Vice President – Human Resources
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, William S. Creekmuir, as Chief Financial Officer of Simmons Bedding Company
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

            (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
      ended March 27, 2004 (the "Report"), being filed with the U.S. Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: August 10, 2004                          /s/ William S. Creekmuir
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Name: William S. Creekmuir
                                               Title:  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simmons Bedding Company and will be retained by Simmons Bedding
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 10.17

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT

 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the 21st day of February, 2007, between and among Roundy’s Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Roundy’s Supermarkets, Inc. (f/k/a/ “Roundy’s, Inc.”), a Wisconsin corporation (“Roundy’s”) and Darren W. Karst (“Executive”).

 

The Company, Roundy’s and Executive are parties to an “Executive Agreement” (the “Original Agreement”) dated as of June 6, 2002, pursuant to which, among other things, Executive has acquired certain shares of the capital stock of the Company and is employed by Roundy’s. The parties wish to amend the Original Agreement to extend its term by one year.

 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree that Section 13(a) of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to change the word “fifth” as it appears in that section to “sixth.” In all other respects the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its original terms.

 

1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment, as of the date first written above.

 

	
ROUNDY’S ACQUISITION CORP.
    	
 
    	
ROUNDY’S SUPERMARKETS, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ John R. Willis
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Edward G. Kitz
    
	
 
    	
John R. Willis, Vice President & Sec’y
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Edward G. Kitz, Group V. P. - Legal, Risk & Treasury
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
EXECUTIVE:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/ Darren W. Karst
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Darren W. Karst
    


 

 

By their signatures below, the undersigned “Investors” (as that term is defined in the Original Agreement), collectively holding a majority of the common and preferred stock of the Company, hereby consent to and approve the foregoing First Amendment to Executive Agreement.

 


	
WILLIS STEIN & PARTNERS   III, L.P.
    	
 
    	
WILLIS STEIN & PARTNERS DUTCH III-A, L.P.
    




 

 

	
By:
    	
/s/ Avy H. Stein
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Avy H. Stein
    
	
 
    	
Avy H. Stein, Manager
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Avy H. Stein, Manager
    


 

	
WILLIS STEIN & PARTNERS   DUTCH III-B, L.P.
    	
 
    	
WILLIS STEIN & PARTNERS   III-C, L.P.
    


 

 

	
By:
    	
/s/ Avy H. Stein
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Avy H. Stein
    
	
 
    	
Avy H. Stein, Manager
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Avy H. Stein, Manager
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 43314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19540]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 178 / Friday, September 15, 2017 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 43314]]

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-103477-14]
RIN 1545-BL96

Chapter 4 Regulations Relating to Verification and Certification 
Requirements for Certain Entities and Reporting by Foreign Financial 
Institutions; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (REG-103477-14) that was published in the Federal Register 
on Friday, January 6, 2017 (82 FR 1629). The notice of proposed 
rulemaking under chapter 4 of the Subtitle A (sections 1471 through 
1474) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Code) relates to 
verification and certification requirements for certain entities and 
reporting by foreign financial institutions.

DATES: This correction is effective September 15, 2017 and is 
applicable beginning January 6, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kamela Nelan at (202) 317-6942 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-103477-14) that is the 
subject of this correction is under sections 1471 through 1474 of the 
Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-103477-14) 
contains an omission which may prove to be misleading and needs to be 
corrected.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking (82 FR 1629, January 
6, 2017) is corrected as follows:
    On page 1636, insert the following language after the eighth line 
from the top of the second column:

``Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, the notice of 
proposed rulemaking (REG-130967-13) that was published in the Federal 
Register on Thursday, March 6, 2014 (79 FR 12868) is withdrawn.''

Martin V. Franks,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2017-19540 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
Dismissed and Opinion Filed March 13, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-00842-CV

BVMG, LLC AND ID HOMES, LLC, Appellants

V.

RESIDENCES AT RAYZOR RANCH, LLC, K-D PARTNERS, LLC, 

RANCHITO DALLAS APTS, LLC AND OHM INVESTOR GROUP, LLC, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-02280

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garcia, Breedlove, and Kennedy

Opinion by Justice Breedlove

Before the Court is the parties March 6, 2023 joint motion to dismiss this 

appeal. In the motion, the parties state they no longer wish to pursue this appeal. 

We grant the parties joint motion and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(a).

230842f.p05

/Maricela Breedlove/

MARICELA BREEDLOVE

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BVMG, LLC AND ID HOMES, 

LLC, Appellants

No. 05-23-00842-CV V.

RESIDENCES AT RAYZOR 

RANCH, LLC, K-D PARTNERS, 

LLC, RANCHITO DALLAS APTS, 

LLC AND OHM INVESTOR 

GROUP, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-02280.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Breedlove. Justices Garcia and 

Kennedy participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 13th day of March, 2024.
#### Aster Afomia GHEBREHANE, Petitioner v. Michael B. MUKASEY, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-60121

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 22, 2008.

Robert H. Etnyre, Jr, Royston, Rayzor, Vickery & Williams, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Sharon A. Hudson, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Houston, TX, for Respondent.

Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Aster Afomia Ghebrehane petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA’s) decision denying her applications for asylum and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) and, additionally, denying her motion to reopen.

Because the BIA expressly adopted and affirmed the immigration judge’s findings and holdings with regard to Ghebrehane’s eligibility for asylum and relief under the CAT, we review the immigration judge’s decision. *Zhu v. Gonzales,*493 F.3d 588, 593 (5th Cir.2007); *see also Chun v. INS,*40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir.1994). The immigration judge found that Ghebrehane was not entitled to asylum because she was not a credible witness based on her internally inconsistent testimony and the discrepancies that existed between her testimony and the written documentation on the issues whether Ghebrehane was born in Eritrea or Ethiopia, when she last resided in Eritrea, how long she resided in Kenya, her residence and occupation in Kenya, and whether her residence in Kenya was restricted. We hold that the immigration judge’s credibility determination was based on a reasonable interpretation of the record and was therefore supported by substantial evidence. *See Chun,*40 F.3d at 79.

Similarly, we hold that the immigration judge’s denial of relief under the CAT was also supported by substantial evidence. *See Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft,*303 F.3d 341, 353 (5th Cir.2002). Insofar as Ghebrehane argues that the BIA erred in denying her motion to reopen, she has not demonstrated an abuse of discretion. *See Pritchett v. INS,*993 F.2d 80, 83 (5th Cir.1993).

PETITION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,155<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       421
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          46,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,383
<SALES>                                         46,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,117
<CGS>                                           34,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,859<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,825
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,056
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,769
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,769
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are comprised of Due from Tax Credit Partnerships and Construction
contracts receivable.
<F2>Other Expenses are comprised of general and administrative, and depreciation
and amortization expenses.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           8,539
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,245
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,454
<INVENTORY>                                     19,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,933
<PP&E>                                          51,673
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 385,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,402
<BONDS>                                        184,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,519
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           320
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   385,412
<SALES>                                        407,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               407,552
<CGS>                                          239,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  239,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,490
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,458
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,458
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-17-041]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission.

# Time and Date:

September 22, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# Status:

Open to the public.

# Matters To Be Considered:

1. Agendas for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-584 and 731-TA-1382 (Preliminary) (Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations on September 25, 2017; views of the Commission are currently scheduled to be completed and filed on October 2, 2017.

5. Vote in Inv. No. TA-201-75 (Injury) (Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells (Whether or Not Partially or Fully Assembled into Other Products)).

6. Outstanding action jackets: None.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.
      ( print page 43255)    
Issued: September 11, 2017.

William R. Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-19650 Filed 9-12-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EXHIBIT
14.1







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-193118) of Enzymotec Ltd. of our report dated February 13, 2014, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Enzymotec Ltd., which appears in this Form 20-F.



















|Tel-Aviv, Israel  | /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman                                    
|----------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|February 13, 2014 | Kesselman & Kesselman                                        
|                  | Certified Public Accountants (lsr.)                          
|                  | A member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-24-00054-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

352nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 352-340517-23

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE SHANNON BROOKS, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: February 7, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>  0001014372 
<NAME> WAXMAN USA INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,106)
<INVENTORY>                                     24,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,719
<PP&E>                                          18,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,435)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,652
<BONDS>                                         36,432
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,878
<SALES>                                         28,229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,229
<CGS>                                           19,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (426)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (162)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (264)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (264)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>