alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 219 

Designating July 25, 2015, as ‘‘National Day of the American Cowboy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2015 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. RISCH, Ms. 

HEITKAMP, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. TESTER, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. LANKFORD, 

Mr. THUNE, and Mr. HOEVEN) submitted the following resolution; which 

was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 25, 2015, as ‘‘National Day of the 

American Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ‘‘cowboys’’, helped to establish the American West; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, 

sound family values, and good common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, 

geographic boundaries, and political affiliations; 

Whereas the cowboy, who lives off the land and works to protect and enhance the environment, is an excellent steward 

of the land and its creatures; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 219 ATS 

Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the 

economy through the work of many thousands of ranchers across the United States who contribute to the economic well-being of every State; 

Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working 

ranch rodeo events annually, making rodeo one of the 

most-watched sports in the United States; 

Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that promote and encompass the livelihood of 

cowboys span every generation and transcend race and 

gender; 

Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and 

music and occupies a central place in the public imagination; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and 

cowgirls to their communities should be recognized and 

encouraged: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 25, 2015, as ‘‘National Day 

3 of the American Cowboy’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
exv10w96





Exhibit 10.96









September 9, 2011




Mr. P. James Debney

Smith & Wesson Holding

2100 Roosevelt Avenue

Springfield, MA 01104





Re: Letter of Amendment



Dear Mr. Debney:



We are parties to a Severance and Change in Control Agreement dated as of October 22, 2010
(the “Agreement”). This will confirm the amendment to the Agreement to delete Clause (a) of
Section 3 of the Agreement effective on the execution of this Letter of Amendment. Except for this
change, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,



Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Jeffrey D. Buchanan
 	 



	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ P. James Debney
 

P. James Debney

	 	 






2100 Roosevelt Avenue • PO Box 2208 • Springfield, MA 01102-2208 • 1-800-331-0852 • www.smith-wesson.com
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41509 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANIBAL GARCIA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-308-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Anibal GarciaGonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
NUMBER 13-17-00509-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ADALBERTO MOSQUEDA GUAJARDO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 430th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the State’s unopposed first amended motion for 

abatement of appeal. The reporter’s record was filed on May 22, 2018 and appellant

filed a second amended brief on July 11, 2018. The State advises this Court appellant 

did not designate for inclusion in the appellate record the reporter’s record for certain 

pretrial proceedings which are necessary to prepare a proper brief in response to 
2

appellant’s assertion of violation of the right to speedy trial. 

When a relevant item has been omitted from the reporter’s record, the trial court, 

the appellate court, or any party may by letter direct the official court reporter to prepare, 

certify, and file in the appellate court a supplemental reporter’s record containing the 

omitted items. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(d). The State has filed a designation of 

additional record with the court reporter for numerous pretrial proceedings and requests 

this Court abate the appeal until the additional reporter’s records are filed.

The Court, having fully examined and considered the State’s unopposed first 

amended motion to abate the appeal, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, the 

motion should be granted. Accordingly, the State’s unopposed first amended motion to 

abate the appeal is GRANTED and the appeal is ABATED. 

The appeal will be reinstated upon receipt of the supplemental reporter’s record as 

designated is filed, and upon further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

3rd day of August, 2018.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CO-PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Century Communities, Inc. (the Company) for the yearly period ended
December 31, 2015, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Robert J. Francescon, Co-Chief Executive Officer and President (Co-Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                          
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 10, 2016 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert J. Francescon                                                 
|                         |  |  |  | Robert J. Francescon                                                     
|                         |  |  |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer and President
(Co-Principal Executive Officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 29, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60375 Summary Calendar

FISEHA TAYE, Petitioner,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A74 082 560

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Fiseha Taye petitions for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily affirming the immigration judge's (IJ) decision to deny his application for withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). After reviewing the record and the briefs, we conclude that the decision is supported by substantial evidence and that the evidence in the record does not compel a conclusion contrary to that reached by the IJ and BIA that Taye failed to show that itNo. 03-60375 -2- was more likely than not that he would be tortured if he were to return to Germany or Ethiopia. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2), INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992); Mikhael v. INS , 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). Therefore, we DENY the petition for review.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Ant onio, Texas** 

September 24, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00581

- CV

Dean DAVENPORT , Dillon Water Resources, Ltd., 5D Drilling and Pump Service, Inc., f/k/a

Davenport Drilling & Pump Service, Inc., 5D Water Resources, LLC f/k/a Davenport Oper.,

LLC, Water Exploration Co., Ltd., WAD, Inc., Water Investment Leasing Company,,

Appellants

v.

Tom HALL , et al.,

Appellee s

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 03086

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The notification of late record is noted. The deadline for filing the reporter’s record is

suspended pending further order of this court

.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2361 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2361

To improve the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by explicitly barring 
   debt collectors from bringing legal action on a debt in which the 
statute of limitations has expired against any consumer, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2011

  Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. McDermott, Mr. 
Meeks, and Ms. Lee of California) introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To improve the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by explicitly barring 
   debt collectors from bringing legal action on a debt in which the 
statute of limitations has expired against any consumer, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Debt Collection Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COLLECTION OF TIME-BARRED DEBT.

    (a) Legal Actions on Time-Barred Debt.--Section 811 of the Fair 
Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. 1692i) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(c) A debt collector may not bring, or threaten to bring, legal 
action against any consumer on a debt in which the statute of 
limitations has expired.''.
    (b) Communication With Consumers With Time-Barred Debt.--Section 
805 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 1692c) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by inserting the following:
    ``(d) Communication With Consumers With Time-Barred Debt.--In 
connection with the collection of debt in which the statute of 
limitations has expired, a debt collector shall disclose to a consumer 
the following:
            ``(1) The debt has been transferred to the debt collector.
            ``(2) The creditor no longer holds the debt.
            ``(3) As a result of the expiration of the statute of 
        limitations with respect to such debt, the debt collector may 
        not bring legal action against the consumer to collect such 
        debt.
            ``(4) Any payment by the consumer towards the debt may 
        cause the statute of limitations for such debt to reset.''.
                                 <all>
```
1 The Honorable R. E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. ___________ No. 95-2477

___________ Francis J. Picray, Jr., * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States City of Des Moines, Iowa; City * District Court for the of Des Moines, Legal Department; * Southern District of Iowa. Reginald V. Sipfle, employee of * the City of Des Moines; Nelda * [UNPUBLISHED] Mickle, employee of the City of * Des Moines, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 2, 1996 Filed: February 22, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Francis J. Picray, Jr., appeals from the district court's 1 grant of summary judgment to defendants in this civil rights action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court properly granted summary judgment, and properly denied Picray's motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2- A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11322 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDUARDO SILVA-ANDRADE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CR-97-2-A

-------------------- October 20, 1999 Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eduardo Silva-Andrade has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Silva-Andrade has filed a motion to proceed pro se on appeal. Silva-Andrade’s motion, having been filed after counsel’s Anders brief, is untimely and is therefore DENIED. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses noNo. 98-11322 -2- nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19742]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


EU-U.S. Privacy Shield; Invitation for Applications for Inclusion 
on the List of Arbitrators; Correction

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce published a document in the Federal 
Register of September 7, 2017, concerning request for comments on the 
EU-U.S. Privacy Shield; Invitation for Applications for Inclusion on 
the List of Arbitrators. The document contained incorrect dates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should 
be directed to Nasreen Djouini at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 
either by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#155b74666770707b3b517f7a607c7b7c5561677471703b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0846697b7a6d6d66264c62677d616661487c7a696c6d266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>, or by fax at: 202-482-
5522.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of September 7, 2017, in FR Doc. 2017-
18896, on pages 42294-42295, in the Method of Collection section, 
correct the date for the deadline of application submissions to read:

II. Method of Collection

    Please submit applications by October 6, 2017 deadline to Nasreen 
Djouini at the U.S. Department of Commerce, either by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f210e1c1d0a0a01412b05001a0601062f1b1d0e0b0a41080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0b456a78796e6e65254f61647e6265624b7f796a6f6e256c647d">[email protected]</span></a>, or by fax at: 202-482-5522. More information 
on the arbitration mechanism may be found at https://www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.

Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-19742 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
of Alcentra Capital Corporation
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act,
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Ellida McMillan, Chief Financial Officer
of Alcentra Capital Corporation, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alcentra Capital Corporation; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 30, 2019



| | /s/ Ellida McMillan    
| | -----------------------
| | Ellida McMillan        
| | Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1

## CFR Correction

 In Title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1 (§§ 1.301 to 1.400) revised as of April 1, 2017, on page 598, in § 1.381(c)(2)-1, paragraph (d) is removed.

[FR Doc. 2017-19397 Filed 9-12-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
sfi8-kex10_1.htm






  





  











  








Section 3:  EX-10.1







AMENDMENT TO FREEZE BENEFIT ACCRUALS UNDER


EXECUTIVE LONG TERM COMPENSATION AGREEMENT







This Amendment is adopted as of this 30th day of December, 2011, by and between Sound Community Bank and Sound Financial, Inc. (collectively, the “Employer”) and Laura Lee Stewart, an individual resident of the State of Washington (the “Executive”).







WHEREAS, the Employer and the Executive have previously entered into an Executive Long Term Compensation Agreement effective August 14, 2007 (the “Agreement”), an unfunded arrangement maintained to encourage the Executive to remain an employee of the Employer;







WHEREAS, the Agreement is designed to provide retirement benefits (the “Benefits”) to the Executive upon his retirement, death, or disability, payable out of the Employer’s general assets; and







WHEREAS, the Employer and the Executive have agreed to freeze the accrual of Benefits under the Agreement as of December 30, 2011;







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Agreement is hereby amended by adding new Section 2.2 as follows:







2.2.     Freeze in Accrued Benefit.  Effective December 30, 2010, notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (i) no additional service or compensation will be credited under the Agreement and  (ii) accrued benefits hereunder will be frozen such that no additional benefits (including disability and death benefits under Article 3) will be accrued under this Agreement.  Such frozen accrued benefits will be paid in accordance with the terms of the Agreement in a manner consistent with section 409A of the Code.











  





  











  













 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and a duly authorized officer of the Employer have signed this Agreement as of the date first written above.













	
    THE EXECUTIVE:

	  	
Sound Community Bank

	  
	  	  	  	  
	
    /s/Laura Lee Stewart

	
By: 

	
 /s/Tyler Myers

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
Its:

	
 Chairman of the Board

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	
 Sound Financial, Inc.

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	
 /s/Tyler Myers

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
Its:

	
 Chairman of the Board