43252 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Notices 

Jersey. The State of New Jersey has a 

long history of selling portions of its 

riparian lands at fair market value, to 

appropriate users, in the form of 

‘‘riparian grants.’’ The National Park 

Service bought a riparian grant from 

New Jersey in 1904 to legitimize its 

expansion of Ellis Island, but even 

though New Jersey sought from the 

1930s to the 1950s to reach agreement 

with the Federal government to convey 

title for the filled portions of Liberty 

Island, no agreement, and therefore no 

such transfer, was effected. No Federal 

purchase of the land has subsequently 

been completed. The Federal 

government has continued to use the 

property without obtaining a riparian 

grant. That situation has not changed. 

As a result, the State of New Jersey’s 

ownership interest in the land 

artificially filled after 1834 was not 

extinguished and still remains in effect. 

In addition, the further statement that 

‘‘the land mass [of Liberty Island] is 

considered part of New York County, 

New York.’’ (Section 7, page 6) should 

also be revised. Only the portion of 

Liberty Island that reflects the island as 

it existed in 1834 lies within New York 

County, New York. In our previous 

comments on the earlier draft, we 

provided a map that delineated the area 

the island’s fill, showing that New 

Jersey’s territory comprises 

approximately 3.4 acres of the island’s 

14.1 acres. (see attachment) 

New Jersey disagrees with the 

wording of footnote #5 (Section 7, page 

6), which has a tendentious effect. The 

National Park Service has every 

reasonable basis to conclude, as New 

Jersey holds, that Liberty Island is 

situated in both states, and does not 

need to claim in this footnote that it is 

not pronouncing upon an issue that 

Section 2 of the document clearly does. 

Your letter cites the 1998 Supreme 

Court decision in New Jersey v. New 

York, decided in New Jersey’s favor (a 

point not mentioned in footnote #5), in 

which it was held that the portion of 

Ellis Island composed of landfill 

emplaced subsequent to the Compact of 

1834 has remained in the territory of 

New Jersey since the time of that 

compact. With respect to the 

neighboring Liberty Island, the factual 

circumstances are nearly identical and 

the same legal reasoning applies that 

formed the basis of the Ellis Island 

decision. As a result, the National Park 

Service should recognize New Jersey 

sovereignty over the western portion of 

the island. 

Keeper’s response to NJ SHPO 

Comment 2 (Concerning Section 7, page 

6): The Keeper disagrees with the NJ 

SHPO’s contention that, ‘‘The National 

Park Service has every reasonable basis 

to conclude, as New Jersey holds, that 

Liberty Island is situated in both states 

. . .’’ The Keeper agrees with the NPS 

assertion that boundary issues between 

states are matters of original jurisdiction 

with the U.S. Supreme Court, and that 

neither the Keeper nor the National Park 

Service are fitted by expertise or 

authority to pronounce upon them. 

Since the issue regarding jurisdiction 

that was raised by the NJ SHPO cannot 

be resolved within the context of this 

nomination, the Keeper has determined 

that the most appropriate course of 

action is to ensure that, as approved by 

the Keeper, the paragraph under 

‘‘Setting’’ on page 7–6 reads: 

Liberty Island is located within New York 

Harbor, one of the world’s busiest shipping 

ports. It is accessed by ferries that run 

regularly from landings at Liberty State Park 

in Jersey City, New Jersey, and Battery Park 

at the southern tip of Manhattan, New York 

City. The island is manifestly flat, with an 

average elevation of about 15 feet (ft) above 

sea level. The landform is approximately a 

quarter-mile long and about .15-mile wide at 

its widest point. Two significant filling 

events, conducted on the west side of the 

island by the US Army during the First 

World War and on the northwestern end of 

the island by the National Park Service in the 

early 1950s, accreted the island to its current 

14.1-acre form. Liberty Island is surrounded 

by New Jersey state waters. The Statue in its 

entirety was constructed and remains within 

the territorial jurisdiction of the State of New 

York. The entire island is administered by 

the National Park Service. The Statue of 

Liberty is located on the southern portion of 

Liberty Island and is immediately 

surrounded on the east, west, and south sides 

by grass lawns. Visitors arrive at the island’s 

West Pier after a ferry trip from Manhattan 

or Jersey City and usually walk to the Statue 

on the island’s primary circulation system, a 

wide paved system of malls and plazas that 

conveys visitors to the main entrance to the 

Statue. The malls and plazas are lined with 

linden trees and yew hedges that give the 

setting a park-like feel. A secondary 

circulation system consisting of interior 

paths and a perimeter promenade offers other 

views of the Statue and New York Harbor 

from a variety of vantage points. Operational 

facilities such as maintenance buildings and 

staff housing are located primarily in the 

northwest corner of the island and are 

screened from public view in most 

directions. (**NOTE: footnote #5 referenced in 

the NJ SHPOs comments regarding the above 

paragraph has been corrected to read as 

footnote #6 in the final nomination 

document.) 

Authority: The National Historic 

Preservation Act of 1966, 54 U.S.C. 302104 

(c)(5)–(6) of; 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60. 

Dated: August 14, 2017. 

J. Paul Loether, 

Chief, NR of Historic Places/National Historic 

Landmarks Program and Keeper, NR of 

Historic Places. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19571 Filed 9–13–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1055] 

Certain Mirrors With Internal 

Illumination and Components Thereof; 

Supplemental Notice of Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Finding the Sole 

Remaining Respondent in Default; 

Request for Written Submissions on 

Remedy, the Public Interest, and 

Bonding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 10) finding the sole 

remaining respondent in default. The 

Commission requests written 

submissions, under the schedule set 

forth below, on remedy, public interest, 

and bonding. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on May 8, 2017, based on a complaint 

filed by Electric Mirror, LLC of Everett, 

Washington (‘‘Electric Mirror’’) and 

Kelvin 42 LLC of Pensacola, Florida 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Notices 43253 

(‘‘Kelvin’’). 82 FR 21405 (May 8, 2017). 

The complaint, as amended, alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain mirrors with 

internal illumination and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 

7,853,414 (‘‘the ’414 patent’’) and 

7,559,668 (‘‘the ’668 patent’’). The 

notice of investigation named as 

respondents Lumidesign Inc. of Ontario, 

Canada (‘‘Lumidesign’’); Majestic 

Mirrors & Frame, LLC of Miami, Florida 

(‘‘Majestic’’); and Project Light, LLC (d/ 

b/a Project Light, Inc., Prospetto Light, 

LLC, and/or Prospetto Lighting, LLC) of 

Stow, Ohio (‘‘Project Light’’). The Office 

of Unfair Import Investigations was not 

named as a party to the investigation. 

The Commission previously 

terminated the investigation in part 

based on withdrawal of allegations 

concerning complainant Kelvin, 

respondent Majestic, and the ’668 

patent. Order No. 6 (June 19, 2017), not 

reviewed Notice (July 10, 2017). The 

Commission also previously terminated 

the investigation with respect to 

respondent Lumidesign based on a 

settlement agreement. Order No. 8 (July 

6, 2017), not reviewed Notice (July 27, 

2017). 

The Commission successfully served 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation on Project Light on May 3, 

2017. See Memorandum in Support of 

Motion by Complainant Electric Mirror, 

LLC for an Order to Show Cause And for 

Entry of Default as to Sole Remaining 

Respondent Project Light, LLC And to 

Suspend the Procedural Schedule (June 

26, 2017) at Ex. A. On June 26, 2017, 

Electric Mirror moved for an order 

directing Project Light to show cause 

why it should not be held in default for 

failing to respond to the complaint, 

notice of investigation, and discovery 

requests. Id. at 1. On July 10, 2017, the 

ALJ granted the motion and ordered 

Project Light to show cause why it 

should not be held in default. Project 

Light did not respond. 

On August 3, 2017, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID, finding Project Light in 

default. No petition for review of the ID 

was filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. 

Section 337(g)(1) and Commission 

Rule 210.16(c) authorize the 

Commission to order relief against a 

respondent found in default, unless, 

after considering the public interest, it 

finds that such relief should not issue. 

In connection with the final 

disposition of this investigation, the 

Commission may: (1) Issue an order that 

could result in the exclusion of articles 

manufactured or imported by Project 

Light; and/or (2) issue cease and desist 

orders that could result in Project Light 

being required to cease and desist from 

engaging in unfair acts in the 

importation and sale of such articles. 

Accordingly, the Commission is 

interested in receiving written 

submissions that address the form of 

remedy, if any, that should be ordered. 

If a party seeks exclusion of an article 

from entry into the United States for 

purposes other than entry for 

consumption, the party should so 

indicate and provide information 

establishing that activities involving 

other types of entry either are adversely 

affecting it or likely to do so. For 

background, see Certain Devices for 

Connecting Computers via Telephone 

Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC 

Pub. No. 2843, Comm’n Op. at 7–10 

(December 1994). 

If the Commission contemplates some 

form of remedy, it must consider the 

effects of that remedy upon the public 

interest. The factors that the 

Commission will consider include the 

effect that the exclusion order and/or 

cease and desists orders would have on 

(1) the public health and welfare, (2) 

competitive conditions in the U.S. 

economy, (3) U.S. production of articles 

that are like or directly competitive with 

those that are subject to investigation, 

and (4) U.S. consumers. The 

Commission is therefore interested in 

receiving written submissions that 

address the aforementioned public 

interest factors in the context of this 

investigation. 

If the Commission orders some form 

of remedy, the U.S. Trade 

Representative, as delegated by the 

President, has 60 days to approve or 

disapprove the Commission’s action. 

See Presidential Memorandum of July 

21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). 

During this period, the subject articles 

would be entitled to enter the United 

States under bond, in an amount 

determined by the Commission and 

prescribed by the Secretary of the 

Treasury. The Commission is therefore 

interested in receiving submissions 

concerning the amount of the bond that 

should be imposed if a remedy is 

ordered. 

Written Submissions: Parties to the 

investigation, interested government 

agencies, and any other interested 

parties are encouraged to file written 

submissions on the issues of remedy, 

the public interest, and bonding. 

Electric Mirror is requested to submit 

proposed remedial orders for the 

Commission’s consideration. Electric 

Mirror is also requested to state the 

HTSUS numbers under which the 

accused products are imported, and to 

state the date that the ’414 patent 

expires. Electric Mirror is further 

requested to supply identification 

information on any known importers. 

The deadline for filing written 

submissions has been extended to the 

close of business on September 20, 

2017. The deadline for filing reply 

submissions has been extended to the 

close of business on September 27, 

2017. No further submissions on these 

issues will be permitted unless 

otherwise ordered by the Commission. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadline 

stated above and submit eight true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary 

pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). 

Submissions should refer to the 

investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. 337– 

TA–1055’’) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. (See 

Handbook for Electronic Filing 

Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/ fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). 

Persons with questions regarding filing 

should contact the Secretary (202–205– 

2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All information, 

including confidential business 

information and documents for which 

confidential treatment is properly 

sought, submitted to the Commission for 

purposes of this Investigation may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) By the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
43254 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Notices 

[1]All contract personnel will sign appropriate 

nondisclosure agreements. 

personnel [1], solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary 

and on EDIS. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 8, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19465 Filed 9–13–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[USITC SE–17–042] 

Government in the Sunshine Act 

Meeting Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United 

States International Trade Commission. 

TIME AND DATE: September 28, 2017 at 

11:00 a.m. 

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 

(202) 205–2000. 

STATUS: Open to the public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agendas for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 731–TA–313, 314, 

317, and 379 (Fourth Review) (Brass 

Sheet and Strip from France, 

Germany, Italy, and Japan). The 

Commission is currently scheduled 

to complete and file its 

determinations and views of the 

Commission by October 13, 2017. 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission 

policy, subject matter listed above, not 

disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 

may be carried over to the agenda of the 

following meeting. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 11, 2017. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19649 Filed 9–12–17; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[USITC SE–17–043] 

Government in the Sunshine Act 

Meeting Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United 

States International Trade Commission. 

TIME AND DATE: September 29, 2017 at 

11:00 a.m. 

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 

(202) 205–2000. 

STATUS: Open to the public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agendas for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701–TA–585–586 

and 731–TA–1383–1384 

(Preliminary) (Stainless Steel 

Flanges from China and India). The 

Commission is currently scheduled 

to complete and file its 

determinations on October 2, 2017; 

views of the Commission are 

currently scheduled to be 

completed and filed on October 10, 

2017. 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission 

policy, subject matter listed above, not 

disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 

may be carried over to the agenda of the 

following meeting. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 11, 2017. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19648 Filed 9–12–17; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[USITC SE–17–040] 

Government in the Sunshine Act 

Meeting Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United 

States International Trade Commission. 

TIME AND DATE: September 19, 2017 at 

11:00 a.m. 

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 

(202) 205–2000. 

STATUS: Open to the public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agendas for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 731–TA–847 and 

849 (Third Review) (Carbon and 

Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and 

Pressure Pipe from Japan and 

Romania). The Commission is 

currently scheduled to complete 

and file its determinations and 

views of the Commission by 

October 10, 2017. 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission 

policy, subject matter listed above, not 

disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 

may be carried over to the agenda of the 

following meeting. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 11, 2017. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19651 Filed 9–12–17; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[USITC SE–17–041] 

Government in the Sunshine Act 

Meeting Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United 

States International Trade Commission. 

TIME AND DATE: September 22, 2017 at 

11:00 a.m. 

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 

(202) 205–2000. 

STATUS: Open to the public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agendas for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701–TA–584 and 

731–TA–1382 (Preliminary) 

(Uncoated Groundwood Paper from 

Canada). The Commission is 

currently scheduled to complete 

and file its determinations on 

September 25, 2017; views of the 

Commission are currently 

scheduled to be completed and 

filed on October 2, 2017. 

5. Vote in Inv. No. TA–201–75 (Injury) 

(Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Cells (Whether or Not Partially or 

Fully Assembled into Other 

Products)). 

6. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission 

policy, subject matter listed above, not 

disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 

may be carried over to the agenda of the 

following meeting. 

By order of the Commission. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES