alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I,Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required tobe filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of theWells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-LC12 (the "Exchange Actperiodic reports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association,as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogicSolutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, Rialto Capital Advisors,LLC, as Special Servicer for the White Marsh Mall Mortgage Loan, U.S. BankTrust Company, National Association, as Trustee for the White Marsh MallMortgage Loan, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor for the White MarshMall Mortgage Loan, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participantfor the White Marsh Mall Mortgage Loan, Computershare Trust Company, NationalAssociation, as Servicing Function Participant for the CertificateAdministrator, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the Custodian.

 

 

 

 

Dated: March 12, 2024

 

 

/s/Anthony Sfarra

AnthonySfarra

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,024-01

EX PARTE MOSES GEORGE MACAULEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1265339-A IN THE 208 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal

his conviction. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed

to timely file a notice of appeal. The judgment in the instant case states that Applicant waived his

right to appeal and that no permission to appeal was granted by the trial court. However, the trial 
2

court has made a specific finding that Applicant had the right to appeal the conviction. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte

Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. 

As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is

the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order counsel to respond to

Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

waived his right to appeal. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to

whether Applicant timely informed counsel that he wanted an appeal, and if so, what actions counsel

took to facilitate that appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
3

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: April 22, 2015

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001014372 
<NAME> WAXMAN USA INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (723)
<INVENTORY>                                     19,621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,802
<PP&E>                                          14,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,230)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,584
<BONDS>                                         36,458
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,144
<SALES>                                         57,427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,427
<CGS>                                           39,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    187
<INCOME-TAX>                                        71
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                116
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       116
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 34.5**

(logo) pwc

 ** **

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanyingReport on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the “Company”), an indirectsubsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’sRegulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv),1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which theCompany has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsiblefor the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertionbased on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standardsof the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, anddetermining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedureswere not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that mayhave affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believethat our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company compliedwith the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for all loans for commercialmortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

  

February 4, 2016

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

  

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas,Texas 75201

T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter
63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as an officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SRI on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of SRI.



|                  |  |     |  |                                         
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ D. Jon McGuire                      
|                  |  |     |  | D. Jon McGuire                          
|                  |  |     |  | Sr. Vice President of Strategic Sourcing



|                  |  |     |  |                                               
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Wallace D. Ruiz                           
|                  |  |     |  | Wallace D. Ruiz                               
|                  |  |     |  | Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Unassociated Document







American Standard Energy Corp.


4800 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 1400


Scottsdale, AZ 85251







December 30, 2011







Scott Feldhacker


3304 East June Circle


Mesa, AZ 85213








	
  

	
Re:

	
Amendments to the Original Agreements (as defined below)












Dear Scott:







Reference is made to the following documents:



	
  

	
·

	
the Deferred Compensation Agreement dated as of April 15, 2010, by and between American Standard Energy Corp. (the “Private Company”), a Nevada corporation that is wholly owned by American Standard Energy Corp. (the “Public Company”), a Delaware corporation, and Scott Feldhacker (the “CEO”), and as ratified by the Public Company on August 29, 2011 (the “Deferred Compensation Agreement”); and








	
  

	
·

	
the Founders Shares Vesting Agreement dated as of April 15, 2010, by and between the Private Company and the CEO (the “Founders Shares Vesting Agreement” and, together with the Deferred Compensation Agreement, the “Original Agreements”).












The purpose of this letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) is to set forth the agreement between you and the Public Company with respect to the Original Agreements in accordance with the following:



	
  

	
·

	
the Deferred Compensation Agreement is hereby amended by deleting and removing the entirety of the paragraph numbered “5.” thereof; and








	
  

	
·

	
it is hereby acknowledged and agreed that the Founders Shares Vesting Agreement is of no further force or effect and is not the binding obligation of the Public Company or the Private Company (other than with respect to the vesting schedule ratified by the Public Company on August 29, 2011, which remains in force and effect).












To indicate your agreement to the foregoing and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby mutually acknowledged, kindly sign and return to the Public Company a counterpart to this Letter Agreement.  Each counterpart shall be deemed to be an original but all of them together will constitute one and the same Letter Agreement.







[signatures on following page]


 




  





  











  












	
Very truly yours,

	 
	  	 
	
AMERICAN STANDARD ENERGY CORP., a Delaware corporation


	  	  	 
	
By:

	
/s/ Richard MacQueen

	 
	  	
 Name:  

	
Richard MacQueen

	 
	  	
 Title:

	
President

	 
	  	  	 
	
AMERICAN STANDARD ENERGY CORP., a Nevada corporation


	  	  	 
	
By:

	
/s/ Richard MacQueen

	 
	  	
 Name:  

	
Richard MacQueen

	 
	  	
 Title:

	
President

	 
	  	  	 
	
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED AS OF

	 
	
THIS 30th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011 BY:

	 
	  	  	 
	
/s/ Scott Feldhacker

	 
	
By: Scott Feldhacker
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2013 (the “Report”) of Fifth Street Senior Floating Rate Corp . (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Leonard M. Tannenbaum , the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    Leonard M. TannenbaumName:    Leonard M. TannenbaumDate: November 25, 2013
Amendment No. 3 dated December 7, 2011



 Exhibit 10(g)(5) 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO THE 
 2007 AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT 

OF THE 

XEROX CORPORATION 
 UNFUNDED SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
 W I T
N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, Xerox Corporation (the “Company”) has established the
Xerox Corporation Unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which is presently set forth in the “2007 Amendment and Restatement of the Xerox Corporation Unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan,” as amended by Amendment to
Certain Deferred Compensation Plans Maintained by Xerox Corporation, dated as of December 4, 2007, and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 (the “Plan”), and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan, 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as
follows: 
 1. Section 6 shall be amended by adding at the end thereof new Subsection (G), which shall read in its entirety as follows:

 “(G) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan (including but not limited to Section 8), no benefits may be
earned under this Plan after December 31, 2012, and no benefit may be based on compensation earned or services performed after December 31, 2012.” 
 The foregoing amendment is effective as of the date stated herein. In all other respects, the Plan remains unchanged. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed as of this 7th day of December, 2011. 

 

			
	XEROX CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas J. Maddison

		 	Vice President
(logo) BERKADIA®

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”)

 

*Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust*

*Series 2013-C10*

 

Pursuant to Section 3.05 ofthe Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the “ServicingAgreement”), as an authorized officer of Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC (“Berkadia”),I hereby attest that:

 

  i.           A review of the activities andperformance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the (reporting period) period,has been made under my supervision.

 

 ii.           To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all materialrespects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout theperiod and no default by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement hasoccurred and is continuing.

 

 

Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC,

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool

Mark E. McCool

President 

February 10, 2024
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LON DERRICK CARTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

NICK DAWSON; KATHY MENDOZAPOWERS,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-15575

D.C. No. 1:07-cv-01325-AWIBAM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Lon Derrick Carter appeals pro se from the district 

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional 

violations in connection with his conditions of confinement. We review de novo, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 3 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-15575 

Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Carter failed 

to raise a genuine dispute of fact as to whether defendants caused Carter to contract 

a bacterial infection. See Harper v. City of Los Angeles, 533 F.3d 1010, 1026 (9th 

Cir. 2008) (“In a § 1983 action, the plaintiff must . . . demonstrate that the 

defendant’s conduct was the actionable cause of the claimed injury.”). 

The district court properly denied Carter’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) motion to 

continue summary judgment to allow further discovery because Carter failed to 

identify specific facts to be obtained in discovery that would have precluded 

summary judgment. See Qualls By & Through Qualls v. Blue Cross of Cal., Inc., 

22 F.3d 839, 844 (9th Cir. 1994) (setting forth standard of review; district court 

properly denied Rule 56(f) (now Rule 56(d)) motion where additional requested 

discovery would not have precluded summary judgment).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Carter’s motions to 

strike the declarations of J. Buck and L. Hansen. See El Pollo Loco, Inc. v. 

Hashim, 316 F.3d 1032, 1041 (9th Cir. 2003) (standard of review). 

AFFIRMED.
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 256 

Designating September 2015 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself and Mr. BOOKER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2015 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

Whereas approximately 480,000 public and private school 

buses carry 26,000,000 children to and from school every 

weekday in the United States; 

Whereas America’s 480,000 public and private school buses 

comprise the largest mass transportation fleet in the Nation; 

Whereas during the school year, school buses make more 

than 55,000,000 passenger trips daily and students ride 

these school buses 10,000,000,000 times per year as the 

Nation’s fleet travels over 5,600,000,000 miles per school 

year; 

Whereas school buses are designed to be safer than passenger 

vehicles and are 13 times safer than other modes of 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 256 ATS 

school transportation, and 44 times safer than vehicles 

driven by teenagers; 

Whereas in an average year, about 25 school children are 

killed in school bus accidents, with one-third of these children struck by their own school buses in loading/unloading zones, one-third struck by motorists who fail to stop 

for school buses, and one-third killed as they approach or 

depart a school bus stop; 

Whereas The Child Safety Network, celebrating 27 years of 

national public service, has collaborated with the National 

PTA and the school bus industry to create public service 

announcements to reduce distracted driving near school 

buses, increase ridership, and provide free resources to 

school districts in order to increase driver safety training, 

provide free technology for tracking school buses, reduce 

on-board bullying, and educate students; and 

Whereas the adoption of School Bus Safety Month will allow 

broadcast and digital media and social networking industries to make commitments to disseminate public service 

announcements designed to save children’s lives by making motorists aware of school bus safety issues: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates September 

2 2015 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C15, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-C15

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 25, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.