alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32










CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capstone Therapeutics Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of John M. Holliman, III, Executive Chairman and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Les M. Taeger, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: August 9, 2010








/s/ John M. Holliman, III


John M. Holliman, III


Executive Chairman


(Principal Executive Officer)








/s/ Les M. Taeger


Les M. Taeger


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Capstone Therapeutics  Corp. and will be retained by Capstone Therapeutics Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1850 as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








I
      hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that the
      accompanying Form 10-QSB of CN Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly
      period ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of; and that the information
      contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company




/s/ Michael
              T. StormMichael
                T. Storm
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              April
                23, 2007





This
      certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
      document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any
      reason other than as specifically required by law.
#### Jerry K. CHAMBLISS, Appellant v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, t/a Amtrak National RR Passenger Corporation, trading as Amtrak and Steven S. Snyder, Appellees.

No. 07-7044.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 28, 2007.

Jerry K. Chambliss, Lawrenceville, GA, pro se.

Keith S. Fischler, Kruchko & Fries, McLean, VA, for Appellees.

BEFORE: ROGERS, GARLAND, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 20, 2007, be affirmed. Appellant has not demonstrated that the proffered reasons for the decision to terminate him were “ ‘false, and that discrimination [or retaliation] was the real reason.’ ” *Weber v. Battista,*494 F.3d 179, 186 (D.C.Cir.2007) (quoting *St. Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks,*509 U.S. 502, 515, 113 S.Ct. 2742, 125 L.Ed.2d 407 (1993)). In addition, to the extent appellant raised a hostile work environment claim, he has failed to show he was subjected to discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult that was so severe or pervasive it altered his conditions of employment and created an abusive working environment. *See Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Sens., Inc.,*523 U.S. 75, 81, 118 S.Ct. 998, 140 L.Ed.2d 201 (1998); *Hussain v. Nicholson,*435 F.3d 359, 366 (D.C.Cir.2006).

Additionally, the district court correctly held that appellant’s assault and battery claim was time-barred, *see*D.C.Code § 12-301(4); appellant failed to satisfy the elements of intentional interference with contract, *see Casco Marina Dev., L.L.C. v. District of Columbia,*834 A.2d 77, 83 (D.C.2003); and appellant did not present the “proof of extreme or outrageous conduct” necessary to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, see *Pitt v. District of Columbia,*491 F.3d 494, 505-06 (D.C.Cir.2007).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. R. 41.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24
- 0336 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PHILLIP MARTIN LONG,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 14 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 9 2024

09/09/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0336
#### Bonnie LITTLE, Plaintiff, v. Donald Ray HOWEY, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 1744.

United States District Court W. D. Missouri, Southwestern Division.

April 1, 1963.

Buehner & Thomas, by Elroy S. Thomas, Joplin, Mo., for plaintiff.

McReynolds, Flanigan & Flanigan, by George M. Flanigan, Carthage, Mo., for defendant.

BECKER, District Judge.

This is a suit for damages alleged to have resulted from personal injuries.

On August 9, 1962, the plaintiff was ordered to submit to an examination by a physician and other persons to be selected by the defendant. The plaintiff submitted to an examination by an orthopedist chosen by the defendant. Although the petition for damages alleged nerve injuries, the defendant did not designate a neurosurgeon to participate in the original examination as he might have done. The wording of the original order was deliberately written so as to provide for this.

Because there seems to be some confusion concerning the right to have more than one medical expert participate in the examination, a supplemental examination will be ordered in this case as a part of the original examination.

*323Ordinarily the examination under Order of Court (like that of August 9, 1962) should be made by the designated examining physician with the assistance of such other specialists, technicians and assistants as may necessarily be required in the judgment of the examining physician and in light of the complaints of the plaintiff. This examination should be conducted in accordance with current medical practice in the diagnosis of similar cases not involving litigation. The examination should cover all claims of injury being made by the plaintiff. More than one person may participate therein. Marshall v. Peters (S. D.Ohio) 31 F.R.D. 238'; 4 Moore, Federal Practice If 35.04, pp. 2558-60; 2A Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 822, p. 483.

If defendants choose a competent physician to make the examination, such other persons may be designated to assist as would be required in a similar examination for diagnosis in the ordinary course of the medical practice.

Because of the lack of clear judicial authority in this District for examination by more than one specialist, defendant’s failure to secure examination by a neurologist at the time of the original examination is excused.

For the reasons stated it is hereby

ORDERED that the plaintiff submit to examination by a neurologist chosen by the defendant, at defendant’s expense and at a time within 20 days of the date of this order mutually convenient to the plaintiff and the neurologist. It is further

ORDERED that the neurologist report his findings in writing to the original examining orthopedic physician and surgeon for inclusion in his report.

Any disagreement concerning the time and place of said examination shall be reported to the Court for settlement by further order.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.9

                                    AMENDED
                         CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF
                   5% CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                       OF
                        TEXAS BIOTECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

     Pursuant to Section 151(g) of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the "DGCL"), David B. McWilliams, President, and Stephen L. Mueller,
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer, of Texas Biotechnology Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify that:

     WHEREAS, all issued and outstanding shares of the Company's 5% Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $.005 per share ("5% Preferred"), were
converted on or before February 1998 in accordance with the provisions of the
Company's Certificate of Designation of 5% Cumulative Convertible Preferred
Stock (5% Certificate of Designation"); and

     WHEREAS, on March 3, 1998, no shares of 5% Preferred were outstanding and
the Board of Directors has determined that no shares of 5% Preferred will be
issued in the future subject to the 5% Preferred Certificate of Designation; and

     WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Section 151(g) of the DGCL,
at a meeting held on March 3, 1998, the Company's Board of Directors duly
approved and adopted the following resolutions:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT

     RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby affirms that no shares of the
5% Preferred are outstanding and that no shares of the 5% Preferred will be
issued subject to the 5% Certificate of Designation; and

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that the proper officers of the Company be and hereby are
authorized and directed to execute, file and deliver the Certificate of
Amendment to the 5% Certificate of Designation (the "5% Amendment") in
accordance with the provisions of the DGCL, which 5% Amendment, when effective,
will (i) cancel and eliminate the 5% Certificate of Designation from the
Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and (ii) return the shares
of the Company's Preferred Stock, $.005 par value, ("Preferred Stock")
previously subject to the 5% Certificate of Designation to the status of
authorized and unissued shares of Preferred Stock.
<PAGE>   2

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amended Certificate of
Designation to be executed by its President and its Vice President, Secretary &
Treasurer, this 3rd day of March 1998.



                                             /s/ DAVID B. MCWILLIAMS
                                             --------------------------
                                             David B. McWilliams,
                                             President




                                             /s/ STEPHEN L. MUELLER
                                             --------------------------
                                             Stephen L. Mueller,
                                             Vice President, Secretary and
                                             Treasurer



                                       2
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Barry Karfunkel, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of National General Holdings Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 16, 2017By:/s/ Barry KarfunkelBarry KarfunkelPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 275 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 275

Calling on Congress, schools, and State and local educational agencies 
to recognize the significant educational implications of dyslexia that 
 must be addressed and designating October 2015 as ``National Dyslexia 
                           Awareness Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 1, 2015

  Mr. Cassidy (for himself and Ms. Mikulski) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Calling on Congress, schools, and State and local educational agencies 
to recognize the significant educational implications of dyslexia that 
 must be addressed and designating October 2015 as ``National Dyslexia 
                           Awareness Month''.

Whereas dyslexia is--

    (1) defined as an unexpected difficulty in reading for an individual 
who has the intelligence to be a much better reader; and

    (2) due to a difficulty in getting to the individual sounds of spoken 
language, which affects the ability of an individual to speak, read, spell, 
and often, learn a language;

Whereas dyslexia is the most common learning disability and affects 80 percent 
        to 90 percent of all individuals with a learning disability;
Whereas an individual with dyslexia may have weakness in decoding or reading 
        fluency and strength in higher level cognitive functions, such as 
        reasoning, critical thinking, concept formation, or problem solving;
Whereas great progress has been made in understanding dyslexia on a scientific 
        level, including the epidemiology and cognitive and neurobiological 
        bases of dyslexia; and
Whereas early diagnosis of dyslexia is critical for ensuring that individuals 
        with dyslexia receive focused, evidence-based intervention that leads to 
        the promotion of self-awareness and self-empowerment and the provision 
        of necessary accommodations so as to ensure school and life success: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) calls on Congress, schools, and State and local 
        educational agencies to recognize that dyslexia has significant 
        educational implications that must be addressed; and
            (2) designates October 2015 as ``National Dyslexia 
        Awareness Month''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
		32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
		PURSUANT TO RULE 13b - 14(b) OF THE SECURITIES**


**EXCHANGE
		ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
		TO**


**SECTION
		906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
		connection with the Quarterly Report of Strayer Education, Inc. (the
		Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed
		with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
		Report), I, Mark C. Brown, Senior Vice President and Chief
		Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
		adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
		that:





(1) The
		Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
		Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
		information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
		the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Mark
		C. Brown





Mark C.
		Brown


Senior
		Vice President and


Chief
		Financial Officer





May 4,
		2007






30




---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 25 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 25

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the final rule of the Administrator of the 
  Environmental Protection Agency relating to ``National Ambient Air 
                     Quality Standards for Ozone''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2015

 Mr. Flake (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Barrasso, Mrs. Capito, Mr. 
 Cassidy, Mr. Coats, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Cruz, Mr. 
Enzi, Mrs. Ernst, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Heller, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. 
 Johnson, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Lee, Mr. McCain, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Moran, 
Mr. Paul, Mr. Risch, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Thune, Mr. Tillis, 
Mr. Vitter, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. Isakson) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the final rule of the Administrator of the 
  Environmental Protection Agency relating to ``National Ambient Air 
                     Quality Standards for Ozone''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency relating to ``National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone'' 
(80 Fed. Reg. 65292 (October 26, 2015)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
    Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
    this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2013-CCRE9 Mortgage Trust (the
    "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
    reports;

4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
    criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
    reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
    accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
    13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
    except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
    of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
    this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital
Markets, Inc.), as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of
PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as
Operating Advisor.


    Dated:   March 28, 2014


    /s/ Helaine M. Kaplan
    Helaine M. Kaplan
    President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
1 The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3329

___________ Vincent Michael Holthaus, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota Diana Eagon; Diane Krenz; * Doug Thomson; Hennepin * [UNPUBLISHED] County Sheriff’s Department, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 18, 2002 Filed: April 3, 2002

___________ Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Minnesota inmate Vincent Michael Holthaus appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the District of Minnesota dismissing his 42 U.S.C.-2- § 1983 action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Holthaus claimed that defendants conspired to deprive him of his due process and equal protection rights by selectively prosecuting him and sentencing him more harshly than others who were similarly situated. After carefully reviewing the record, we agree with the district court that Holthaus’s complaint failed to allege sufficient facts to support his claims, see Martin v. Sargent , 780 F.2d 1334, 1337 (8th Cir. 1985), and that the claims would in any event be barred under Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.