alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
      in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







Date:May
                11, 2006
            By:/s/ Joseph M. CumminsJoseph
                M. CumminsPresident,
                Chief Executive Officerand
                Chief Financial Officer
#### Red Tulip, LLC, Plaintiff, v Junia Hissa Neiva et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.) Palm Beach Mortgage Management, LLC, Respondent, v Red Tulip, LLC, et al., Defendants, and Junia Hissa Neiva, Appellant.

Submitted December 10, 2007;

decided February 12, 2008

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit 32.1

        Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Henry E.
Gemino, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of Profile
Technologies, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Profile Technologies, Inc.


                                             /s/ Henry E. Gemino
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Henry E. Gemino,
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             and
                                             Chief Financial Officer







                                       27
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 261 

Designating the week of October 11 through October 17, 2015, as ‘‘National 

Case Management Week’’ to recognize the role of case management 

in improving health care outcomes for patients. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2015 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself and Mr. COTTON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of October 11 through October 17, 

2015, as ‘‘National Case Management Week’’ to recognize the role of case management in improving health 

care outcomes for patients. 

Whereas case management is a collaborative process of assessment, education, planning, facilitation, care coordination, evaluation, and advocacy; 

Whereas the goal of case management is to meet the health 

needs of the patient and the family of the patient, while 

respecting and assuring the right of the patient to selfdetermination through communication and other available 

resources in order to promote high-quality, cost-effective 

outcomes; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 261 IS 

Whereas case managers are advocates who help patients understand their current health status, guide patients on 

ways to improve their health, and provide cohesion with 

other professionals on the health care delivery team; 

Whereas the American Case Management Association and the 

Case Management Society of America work diligently to 

raise awareness about the broad range of services that 

case managers offer and to educate providers, payers, 

regulators, and consumers on the improved patient outcomes that case management services can provide; 

Whereas through National Case Management Week, the 

American Case Management Association and the Case 

Management Society of America aim to continue to educate providers, payers, regulators, and consumers about 

how vital case managers are to the successful delivery of 

health care; 

Whereas the American Case Management Association and the 

Case Management Society of America will celebrate National Case Management Week during the week of October 11 through October 17, 2015, in order to recognize 

case managers as an essential link to patients receiving 

quality health care; and 

Whereas it is appropriate to recognize the many achievements 

of case managers in improving health care outcomes: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of October 11 through 

3 October 17, 2015, as ‘‘National Case Management 

4 Week’’; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 261 IS 

1 (2) recognizes the role of case management in 

2 providing successful and cost-effective health care; 

3 and 

4 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe National Case Management Week and 

6 learn about the field of case management. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CALIPERLIFE SCIENCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

 

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E. Kevin Hrusovsky,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to therequirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                    The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

(2)                    The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|                   | /s/ E. KEVIN HRUSOVSKY                                                                   |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                                                                     |
|                   | E. Kevin Hrusovsky  President and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                   |                                                                                     |
|                   |                                                                                     |
| Date: May 8, 2009 |                                                                                     |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2

                                 Certifications

     I, Philip L. Jones, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Profile
Technologies, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

          b) (Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238.);

          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

     5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.

     Date:  November 14, 2003

     /s/ Philip L. Jones, Chief Operating Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60156 Conference Calendar

JERRY W. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus EARNEST DAWSON; DEBBIE HUGGINS; JEFFERY CAIN, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:97-CV-30-D-A

- - - - - - - - - - August 19, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jerry W. Washington, a Mississippi inmate (# 82762), appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Washington argues that the district court erred in determining that he had failed to state a cognizable 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim that the defendants had failed to protect him from an assault by another inmate. We have reviewed the record and Washington’s brief and find no reversible error. WeNo. 98-60156 -2- therefore AFFIRM for essentially the same reasons stated by the magistrate judge in his report and recommendation, which was adopted by the district court. See Washington v. Dawson , No. 4:97-CV-30-D-B (N.D. Miss. Oct. 9, 1997); see also Farmer v.
Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 833-34, 842-43 (1994).
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Richard K. Crump, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Sterling
Chemicals, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


      (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report of the Company for the period ending
June 30, 2003, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2003

                                        /s/ RICHARD K. CRUMP
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard K. Crump,
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of
chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as interim principal financial officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SRI on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of SRI.



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                    
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 4, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark R. Faris                                                  
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | Mark R. Faris                                                      
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | Controller and Vice President (interim principal financial officer)
#### Blood *v.*Merritt, Collector, etc.*

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

March 8, 1882.)

Duties on Imports — Colored Fashion Plates — Exemption.

Colored, fashion plates are not liable to duty under the laws of the United States.

*

 Reported by S. Nelson White, Esq., of the New York bar.

Shipman, D. J.

This case was tried by the court upon the agreed statement of facts on file, and which is a part of the record, the parties having waived a jury by stipulation in writing. Upon said facts I am of opinion that the colored fashion plates mentioned in the complaint are not liable to duty under the laws of the United States, and therefore direct that judgment be rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount named in said statement, and for his costs.

The court also grants a certificate of probable cause for tho acts done by the defendant as collector, and set forth in said complaint.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,315,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,663,585
<PP&E>                                         489,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                 258,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,180,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,285
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,007,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,180,034
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               246,421
<CGS>                                          150,550
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  282,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (164,690)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (164,690)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (164,690)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.40)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3
 Imation Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement
 «GrantDt» «Name»
   Award of Performance-Based Restricted Stock «GranDt» «Shares»(«NbrShares»)
 Rights with Respect to the Shares
 Stockholder Rights
 Dividends
 Issuance of Shares




---



##### 



Vesting; Forfeiture
 Vesting
 
 Forfeiture
 Change in Control and
 2




---



##### 



Early Vesting
 Clawback
 3




---



##### 



Restrictions on Transfer
 Distributions and Adjustments
   Taxes
   4




---



##### 



Definitions
     5




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Plan Provisions
 6




---



##### 



No Rights to Continue Service or Employment
 Entire Agreement
 Modification
 Shares Subject to Agreement
 Severability
 Headings
 7




---



##### 



Participants Acknowledgments
 Parties Bound
  IMATION CORP.By:Name:Title: 8




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 9
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2013-CCRE8

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of June 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor,
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC
Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,
as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies
in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator





BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2015
#### S. H. STEVENS AND ANOTHER, *d. b. a.*SLEET-SHAVER MFG. COMPANY, v. FEDERAL CARTRIDGE CORPORATION, *d. b. a.*TWIN CITIES ORDNANCE PLANT.1, 2

June 24, 1949.

No. 35,027.

See, 226 Minn. 148, 32 N. W. (2d) 312.

*Clarence O. Holten*and *James S. Eriksson,*for appellants.

*John W. Graff,*Acting United States Attorney, and *William P. Murphy,*Assistant United States Attorney, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 38 N. W. (2d) 154.

2

 Certiorari denied by U. S. Supreme Court January 16, 1950.

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment. The case was here before and our opinion filed April 23, 1948. Stevens v. Federal Cartridge Corp. 226 Minn. 148, 32 N. W. (2d) 312. For the reasons given in the previous opinion and upon authority of that opinion, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
#### In the Matter of City of New York, Appellant, Relative to the Melrose Commons Urban Renewal Area, Phase II. Kaiser Woodcraft Corp., Respondent.

Submitted December 24, 2007;

decided February 14, 2008

Motion by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey for leave to file a letter brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the letter brief is accepted as filed.
Amendment No. 1 to ESOP Loan Agreement



 Exhibit 10.14 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ESOP LOAN AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 to ESOP
Loan Agreement (“Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between Farmer Bros. Co., a California corporation, as Lender and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as trustee for the Farmer Bros. Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan as the Borrower.

 RECITALS 
  

	A.	Lender and Borrower have entered into an ESOP Loan Agreement dated March 28, 2000 (the “Loan Agreement”) which provides that advances can be made by
Lender to Borrower through a period ending on December 31, 2002. 

  

	B.	Lender and Borrower desire to amend the Loan Agreement to extend the date for advances through and including July 31, 2003. 


NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 1.2 of the Loan Agreement is amended by changing the date December 31, 2002, as it appears in both places in Section 1.2, to My 31, 2003.


  

	2.	In all other respects the Loan Agreement is ratified and approved. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date set forth below effective as of December 31, 2002. 

 

									
	Dated: JUNE 26, 2003	 		 	Farmer Bros. Co.
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Roy E. Farmer
		 		 		 		 	Roy E. Farmer, President
		 		 	
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ John E. Simmons
		 		 		 		 	John E. Simmons, Treasurer
			
	Dated: JUNE 30, 2003	 		 	Farmer Bros. Co. Stock Ownership Plan
			
		 		 	Wells Fargo, N.A., as trustee for the Fanner Bros.
Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ E. Pigott
		 		 		 	Title:	 	VICE PRESIDENT