alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         333,322
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,278,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                   252,482
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,111,586
<PP&E>                                         2,458,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                 950,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 36,131,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,079,269
<BONDS>                                        12,366,080
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    3,648
<COMMON>                                       11,914
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,262,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   36,131,459
<SALES>                                        2,237,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,231,897
<CGS>                                          1,487,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,366,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,966,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               295,833
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             582,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (943,992)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (943,992)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (943,992)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.6


CERTIFICATIONS


I, Chad M. Paris, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Jason Industries, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


Date: April 29, 2020


/s/ Chad M. ParisChad M. ParisSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6916** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. LAVERN JUNIOR JACOBS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 3:04

- cr - 00277

- RLV

- DCK

- 1; 3:13

- cv - 00263

- RLV )

Submitted : December 20, 2013 Decided: January 8, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Lavern Junior Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. William Michael Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Keith Michael Cave, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lavern Junior Jacobs seeks to appeal the district court’s order d ismissing as suc cessive his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( 201 2 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial show ing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jacobs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and arg ument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002**





I
      hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying Form 10-QSB of CN
      Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30,
      2005,
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company








/s/Jan
      W.
      Clark





Jan
      W.
      Clark


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


November
      4, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0390 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JASON AARON CARRYWATER,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 1 0 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 7 2021

10/07/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0390
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

 Thursday, September 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

 This hearing will be open to the public.

# ITEM TO BE DISCUSSED:

*Audit Hearing:*                         Conservative Majority Fund. Freedom's Defense Fund.                    

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Dayna Brown, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Dayna C. Brown,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2017-19356 Filed 9-7-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF BRENT R. FREI PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Onyx Software Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Brent R. Frei, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: May 7, 2004

By:     /s/ Brent R. Frei
   ----------------------------
          BRENT R. FREI
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
       CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
**Exhibit 31.1**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION  I, Steven C. Futrell, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Croghan Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrolsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usbyothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrolsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: October 26, 2006 /s/  Steven C. Futrell   Steven C. Futrell, President and CEO   (Principal Executive Officer)   
19
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of Alcentra Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Paul J. Echausse, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Paul J. EchausseName: Paul J. Echausse Date:  March 9, 2017
EX-34.12
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Certified Public Accountants
333 Southeast Second Avenue
Suite 3600
Miami, FL 33131
USA

Tel: +1 305 372 3100
Fax: +1 305 372 3160
www.deloltte.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


LNR Partners, LLC
Miami Beach, Florida

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that LNR Partners, LLC (the "Company") complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities
transactions for which the Company served as special servicer, and that were
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December
31, 2013, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), (3)(i)(c), (3)(i)(d), (3)(ii),
(3)(iii), (3)(iv), (4)(v), (4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii),
(4)(xiv) and (4)(xv) which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were
limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have
included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included
in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period
specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or
reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2013 for the commercial mortgage-backed securities Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 28, 2014


Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No s. 1D 17

- 649 1D 17

- 657 1D 17

- 659

_____________________________
H ENRY L. L YNN I II
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge

. April 3, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , B ILBREY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Candice K. Brower, Regional Conflict Counsel, and Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
ex10_1.htm








Exhibit 10.1







SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION







Policy on Recovery of Incentive Compensation from Executives







The Company awards both cash incentive compensation and equity-based compensation to its executives from time to time (collectively, together with any other bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation, "Incentive Compensation").  Beginning January 1, 2012, if Sensient is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to Sensient's material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, as a result of misconduct by a current or former executive officer (the "Offending Officer"), the  Compensation and Development Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") shall have the right to recover on behalf of the Company from the Offending Officer, acting in the Committee's sole discretion based upon the facts and circumstances:


 



	
(1)

	
all or any portion of any Incentive Compensation received by the Offending Officer from Sensient during the 12-month period following the first public issuance or filing with the SEC (whichever occurs first) of the financial document embodying such financial reporting requirement; and







 



	
(2)

	
any profits realized by the Offending Officer from the sale of Sensient securities during that 12-month period.







 


This right of recovery and the corresponding reimbursement obligations shall be deemed to be incorporated into all awards of Incentive Compensation occurring after the date this policy is adopted and shall be deemed accepted by each recipient as a condition to any award.  It may also be included in the Incentive Compensation award documents.


 


Nothing herein shall limit or restrict the Company's other rights to take any other actions that it deems appropriate to remedy any fraud or misconduct.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 186 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 186

  Designating the week of May 17 through May 23, 2015, as ``National 
                          Public Works Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2015

    Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mrs. Boxer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of May 17 through May 23, 2015, as ``National 
                          Public Works Week''.

Whereas public works infrastructure, facilities, and services are of vital 
        importance to the health, safety, and well-being of the people of the 
        United States;
Whereas the public works infrastructure, facilities, and services could not be 
        provided without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals, 
        including engineers and administrators, who represent State and local 
        governments throughout the United States;
Whereas public works professionals design, build, operate, and maintain the 
        transportation systems, water infrastructure, sewage and refuse disposal 
        systems, public buildings, and other structures and facilities that are 
        vital to the people and communities of the United States; and
Whereas understanding the role that public infrastructure plays in protecting 
        the environment, improving public health and safety, contributing to 
        economic vitality, and enhancing the quality of life of every community 
        of the United States is in the interest of the people of the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of May 17 through May 23, 2015, as 
        ``National Public Works Week'';
            (2) recognizes and celebrates the important contributions 
        that public works professionals make every day to improve--
                    (A) the public infrastructure of the United States; 
                and
                    (B) the communities that public works professionals 
                serve; and
            (3) urges individuals and communities throughout the United 
        States to join with representatives of the Federal Government 
        and the American Public Works Association in activities and 
        ceremonies that are designed--
                    (A) to pay tribute to the public works 
                professionals of the United States; and
                    (B) to recognize the substantial contributions that 
                public works professionals make to the United States.
                                 <all>
```