alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Amarillo  Biosciences,  Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date: May 11, 2006                      By:  /s/ Joseph M. Cummins
                                           -----------------------------------
                                            Joseph M. Cummins
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
S. 984 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide Medicare beneficiary 

access to eye tracking accessories for speech generating devices and to remove 

the rental cap for durable medical equipment under the Medicare Program with 

respect to speech generating devices. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Steve Gleason Act of 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. PROVIDING MEDICARE BENEFICIARY ACCESS TO EYE 

TRACKING ACCESSORIES FOR SPEECH GENERATING 

DEVICES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(n) of the Social Security Act 

(42 U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and eye tracking 

and gaze interaction accessories for speech generating devices furnished to individuals with a demonstrated medical need for such 

accessories’’ after ‘‘appropriate organizations)’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall apply with respect to devices furnished on or after January 

1, 2016. 

SEC. 3. REMOVING THE RENTAL CAP FOR DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT UNDER MEDICARE WITH RESPECT TO SPEECH GENERATING DEVICES. 

Section 1834(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

1395m(a)(2)(A)) is amended— 

(1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(2) in clause (iii), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end; and 

(3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following new clause: 

‘‘(iv) in the case of devices furnished on or after 

October 1, 2015, and before October 1, 2018, which 

serves as a speech generating device or which is an 
S. 984—2 

accessory that is needed for the individual to effectively 

utilize such a device,’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15300 and #15301; PUERTO RICO Disaster Number 
PR-00030]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 
(FEMA-4336-DR), dated 09/10/2017.
    Incident: Hurricane Irma.
    Incident Period: 09/05/2017 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 09/10/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/09/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/11/2018.

ADDRESS:  Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/10/2017, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Culebra, Vieques

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
    Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available              2.500
     Elsewhere...............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 153008 
and for economic injury is 153010.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-19572 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50823

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

NOE CRUZ FERNANDEZ-SANCHEZ, also known as Jesus Alfredo Fernandez,

also known as Noe Cruz-Fernandez, also known as Noe Sanchez-Fernandez,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:09-CR-88-1

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Noe Cruz Fernandez-Sanchez appeals from his conviction of illegal

reentry. He contends that the district court erred by adjusting his offense level

pursuant to section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) of the Sentencing Guidelines based on his

state court deferred adjudication of aggravated assault on a peace officer with

a deadly weapon. He argues that it was improper to use the deferred

adjudication because he pleaded nolo contendere and thus was not determined

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 24, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-50823 Document: 00511244344 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/24/2010
No. 09-50823

to be guilty. He further contends that the use of his deferred adjudication

constituted a bill of attainder. Fernandez-Sanchez did not raise his contentions

in the district court; our review thus is for plain error. Puckett v. United States,

129 S. Ct. 1423, 1428 (2009).

The state court magistrate who took Fernandez-Sanchez’s nolo contendere

plea determined that the evidence was sufficient to establish his guilt. His nolo

contendere plea was the equivalent of a guilty plea. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

P. ANN. arts. 27.02(5), 42.12 § 5(a); United States v. Cuevas, 75 F.3d 778, 781 n.8

(5th Cir. 1996). The district court did not err by using the deferred adjudication

to adjust Fernandez-Sanchez’s offense level. See United States v. Valdez-Valdez,

143 F.3d 196, 198-201 (5th Cir. 1998).

A bill of attainder is “a law that legislatively determines guilt and inflicts

punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections

of a judicial trial.” Nixon v. Administrator of Gen. Servs., 433 U.S. 425, 468

(1977); see also Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activs.

Control Bd., 367 U.S. 1, 86 (1961) (“The singling out of an individual for

legislatively prescribed punishment constitutes an attainder whether the

individual is called by name or described in terms of conduct which, because it

is past conduct, operates only as a designation of particular persons.”).

The use of deferred adjudications to adjust an offense level pursuant to

section 2L1.2 does not single out Fernandez-Sanchez for a determination of guilt

and the imposition of punishment. See Nixon, 433 U.S. at 468.

Fernandez-Sanchez has failed to demonstrate error, plain or otherwise.

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 09-50823 Document: 00511244344 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/24/2010
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual Report of Right On Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2019 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ashok Patel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |

 

| By:    | */s/ Ashok Patel*           |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Ashok Patel                 |   |
| Title: | Principal Executive Officer |   |
| Date:  | July 24, 2019               |        |

 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1

        Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Henry E.
Gemino, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of Profile
Technologies, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Profile Technologies, Inc.


Date:  February 12, 2008                            /s/ Henry E. Gemino
                                                    -------------------
                                                    Henry E. Gemino
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19648]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-17-043]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: September 29, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered: 
1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-585-586 and 731-TA-1383-1384 (Preliminary) 
(Stainless Steel Flanges from China and India). The Commission is 
currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations on October 
2, 2017; views of the Commission are currently scheduled to be 
completed and filed on October 10, 2017.
5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 11, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-19648 Filed 9-12-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Paul G. Vanderhoven, as Senior Vice President  Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report of the Company for the period ending
June 30, 2004, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: August 10, 2004 /s/ PAUL G. VANDERHOVENPaul G. Vanderhoven,Senior Vice President  Finance andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with Starwood Waypoint Residential Trusts (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2013 (the Report), I, Gary M. Beasley, and I, Douglas R. Brien do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ GARY M. BEASLEY       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Gary M. Beasley           
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer

|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 28, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ DOUGLAS R. BRIEN      
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Douglas R. Brien          
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed on the date
hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ John R. Troka, Jr.John R. Troka, Jr.Interim Chief Financial Officer
Guarantee, dated December 8, 2011, relating to the Existing Secured Notes.



 Exhibit 4.23 
 GUARANTEE 
 Warner Music Group Corp. (the “Guarantor”) hereby
unconditionally guarantees WMG Acquisition Corp.’s 9.50% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 issued pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of May 28, 2009, by and among WMG Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation, as issuer (the
“Issuer”), the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (the “Trustee”), as amended by the Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 23, 2011, among the Issuer, WMG Holdings
Corp., the guarantors party thereto and the Trustee, as amended by the Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2011, among the Issuer, WMG Holdings Corp., the guarantors party thereto and the Trustee (such indenture, as the same may
be amended, restated or supplemented from time to time, the “Indenture”), to the extent set forth in and in accordance with the Indenture. 
 The obligations of the Guarantor pursuant to this Guarantee and the Indenture, are expressly set forth in Article Eleven of the Indenture, and reference is hereby made to the Indenture for the precise
terms and limitations of this Guarantee. 
 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in
the Indenture. 
 [Signatures on Following Pages] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Warner Music Group Corp. has caused this Guarantee to be signed by a
duly authorized officer. 
 DATED: December 8, 2011 

 

			
	WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul Robinson

	Name:	 	Paul Robinson
	Title:	 	EVP & General Counsel


 [Signature Page to the Warner Music Group Guarantee of the WMG Existing Secured Notes]
#### JOHN WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff, v. Harold R. ULLRICH, Ora G. Jones, Jr., E. R. Quinn, Mrs. E. S. Hall, S. B. Foot, individually and as members of the T. B. Sheldon Auditorium Board of the City of Red Wing, Minnesota, City of Red Wing, Minnesota, John B. Friedrich, Philip S. Duff, Jr., Red Wing Publishing Co., James Fraser, 20th Century-Fox Film Corporation, United Artists Corporation and Paramount Film Distributing Corporation, Defendants.

No. 3-59-Civ.-169.

United States District Court D. Minnesota, Third Division.

Aug. 1, 1960.

*20Fryberger, Townsend & Ewing, by R. H. Fryberger, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff.

Bundlie & Kelley, by Mandt Torrison, St. Paul, Minn., for defendants.

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

I very much doubt that plaintiff has a cause of action against these motion picture distributors, but that isn't to say that it shouldn’t have an opportunity to come into court and attempt to prove it. And to grant summary judgment would be to deny it that opportunity. Our superiors on the Court of Appeals have repeatedly admonished us to grant summary judgment only in very exceptional cases. Principles to be applied are fully announced in Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc., 8 Cir., 189 F.2d 213, at page 216, as follows:

> “A summary judgment is to be entered in a case if, but only if, the pleadings, depositions, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A summary judgment upon motion therefor by a defendant in an action should never be entered except where the defendant is entitled to its allowance beyond all doubt. To warrant its entry the facts conceded by the plaintiff, or demonstrated beyond reasonable question to exist, should show the right of the defendant to a judgment with such clarity as to leave no room for controversy, and they should show affirmatively that the plaintiff would not be entitled to recover under any discernible circumstances. Ramsouer v. Midland Valley R. Co., D.C.Ark., 44 F.Supp. 523, reversed on other grounds, 8 Cir., 135 F.2d 101. A summary judgment is an extreme remedy, and, under the rule, should be awarded only when the truth is quite clear. American Insurance Company v. Gentile Brothers Company, 5 Cir., 109 F.2d 732; Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company, D.C.N.Y., 1 F.R.D. 451; Drittel v. Friedman, D.S.N.Y., 60 F.Supp. 999; U. S. ex rel. Ryan v. Broderick, D.C.Kan., 59 F.Supp. 189. And all reasonable doubts touching the existence of a genuine issue as to a material fact must be resolved against the party moving for summary judgment. Sarnoff v. Ciaglia, 3 Cir., 165 F.2d 167.”

A more recent case enunciating the same principles is Kennedy v. Bennett, 8 Cir., 261 F.2d 20.

The plaintiff insists that there is a fact issue as to the involvement of the motion picture distributors in the claimed monopoly. From as much as I have heard, I doubt if it can show it, but it must have its chance to do so, and hence the denial of the motion for summary judgment.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 24, 2010 

s0317 

Order 

 

March 24, 2010 

140042 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140042 

 COA: 293405 

Iosco CC: 08-004093-FC 

RANDY ALLEN ADAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 7, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.