alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 10128]

The Department of State's Advisory Committee on Private International Law (ACPIL) will hold its annual meeting on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 in Washington, DC. The meeting will be held at the Georgetown University Law Center, Gerwirz Student Hall, 600 New Jersey Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The program is scheduled to run from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

The discussion will focus on topics to include contractual networking, investor-state dispute settlement, and warehouse receipts. It is anticipated that discussions will explore the possibility of future work in the private international law field with a solicitation for suggestions in that regard.

                    Persons planning to attend the meeting should contact                     *pil@state.gov*                     as soon as possible. The meeting is open to the public up to the capacity of the conference facility, and seating will be reserved based upon when persons contact                     *pil@state.gov.*                     Those planning to attend should provide their name, affiliation and contact information to                     *pil@state.gov.*                     A member of the public needing reasonable accommodation should notify                     *pil@state.gov*                     not later than October 20, 2017. Requests made after that date will be considered, but might not be able to be fulfilled. A more detailed agenda will be available as the meeting approaches. Persons who wish to have their views considered are encouraged, but not required, to submit written comments in advance. Those who are unable to attend are also encouraged to submit written views. Comments should be sent electronically to                     *pil@state.gov.*

Michael S. Coffee,

Attorney-Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-19624 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of
chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SRI on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of SRI.



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 3, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gerald Woodard     
|                     |  |     |  | Gerald Woodard         
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of: Randall M. SCHULZE, Debtor. Randall M. Schulze, Doctor of Chiropractic, Appellant v. Cap Collection JV7; Randall B. Johnson; CA Partners; N. West Short; Paula D. Effle; N. West Short & Associates PC, Appellees.

No. 07-51019.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 3, 2008.

Gary Maurice Poenisch, Law Office of Gary Poenisch, San Antonio, TX, for Appellant.

N. West Short, Georgetown, TX, pro se.

N. West Short, Georgetown, TX, for Ap-pellees.

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. *See*5th Cir. R. 47.6.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir, R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47,5.4.
EX-35.8
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 01d Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
1585 Broadway
Attn: Mortgage Backed Securities
New York, New York 10036

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill
    Lynch Trust 2013-C9, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series
    2013-C9


Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
    performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's
    supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
    has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
    respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 7, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2439 

To amend the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness 

Act of 1992 to authorize the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as 

receiver of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, to revoke the charters of such 

enterprises or any limited-life regulated entity established under such 

receivership. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2011 

Mr. STIVERS (for himself, Mr. BACHUS, and Mr. GARRETT) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety 

and Soundness Act of 1992 to authorize the Federal 

Housing Finance Agency, as receiver of Fannie Mae 

or Freddie Mac, to revoke the charters of such enterprises or any limited-life regulated entity established 

under such receivership. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing GSEs Char5 ters During Receivership Act of 2011’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2439 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF RECEIVER TO REVOKE ENTERPRISE 

2 CHARTER ON WIND-UP OR TERMINATION OF 

3 LIMITED-LIFE REGULATED ENTITY. 

4 Section 1367 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Fi5 nancial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 

6 4617) is amended by striking subsection (k) and inserting 

7 the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(k) AUTHORITY OF RECEIVER TO REVOKE ENTER9 PRISE CHARTER.—The Agency as receiver of an enter10 prise— 

11 ‘‘(1) may revoke the charter of the enterprise; 

12 and 

13 ‘‘(2) shall, not later than the winding up or ter14 mination, in accordance with subsection (i)(6), of the 

15 limited-life regulated entity established with respect 

16 to such enterprise, revoke the charter of such enter17 prise.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 50314

SOUTHWESTERN WOMEN'S SURGERY CENTER; BROOKSIDE WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER, P.A., doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center; ROBIN WALLACE, M.D., M.A.S.; HOUSTON WOMEN'S CLINIC; PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE; PLAN NED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS SURGICAL HEALTH SERVICES; PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH TEXAS SURGICAL CENTER; WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH; WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees

v.

GREG ABBOTT, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, i n his official capacity; KEN PAXTON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas; PHIL WILSON, in his official capacity as Acting Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission; STEPHEN BRINT CARLTON, in his official cap acity as Executive Director of the Texas Medical Board; KATHERINE A. THOMAS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Board of Nursing,

Defendants

- Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:20

- CV

- 323 United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
April 20, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk Case: 20-50314 Document: 00515388293 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2020No. 20

- 50314

2 Before DENNIS, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges

.
PER CURIAM: *

Defendants

- Appellants appeal the order entered by the district court on

April 9, 2020 and extended on April 14, 2020. Temporary restraining orders

are not appealable; however, an order styled a temporary restraining order

may be appealed if its “actual co ntent, purport, and effect” is that of a

preliminary injunction. Smith v. Grady , 411 F.2d 181, 186 (5th Cir. 1969); see

also 28 U.S.C. § 1292. We conclude that the orders involved here are properly

understood as an extended temporary restraining order an d that we lack

jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal for want of

jurisdiction and DENY AS MOOT the emergency motion to stay.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 20-50314 Document: 00515388293 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2020
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-23-00104-CR

LAPRENSE DERELL WILLIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18F1272-005

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Laprense Derell Willis, perfected this appeal from a judgment of conviction 

entered by the 5th Judicial District Court of Bowie County, Texas, in trial court cause number 

18F1272-005. Appellant’s counsel filed a motion with this Court seeking the permanent 

abatement of this appeal due to the death of the appellant. According to the motion, appellant 

died on December 30, 2023, which was after the appeal was perfected but before this Court 

issued its mandate.

In accordance with Rule 7.1(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant 

this motion and permanently abate this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(a)(2); State v. McCaffrey, 

76 S.W.3d 392, 392 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002) (“We have long held that the death of the appellant 

during the pendency of his appeal deprives the court of jurisdiction[,] and the proper disposition 

is [permanent] abatement.”); Whitmire v. State, 943 S.W.2d 894, 895 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)

(per curiam).

Scott E. Stevens

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: December 27, 2023

Date Decided: January 9, 2024

Do Not Publish
f8k021111ex10vi_trianglecast.htm


 


Exhibit 10.6


 


BUFFALO MANAGEMENT LLC


555 South Barrington Avenue, #206


Los Angeles CA 90049







February 11, 2011







Prospect Global Resources Inc.


600 17th Street, Suite 2800 South


Denver CO 80202


Attention:  Patrick Avery







Dear Pat:







This letter confirms our agreement with respect to fees owed to Buffalo Management LLC ("Buffalo") pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Management Services Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of January 6, 2011 between Buffalo and Prospect Global Resources Inc. ("Prospect").  Upon the anticipated closing of the merger transaction (the "Merger") between Prospect and Triangle Castings, Inc. ("Triangle"), Prospect will owe Buffalo $935,000 (the "Accrued Obligation") pursuant to the Agreement, calculated as follows:








	
●

	
Accrued monthly Consulting Fees of $140,000








	
●

	
Accrued monthly Office Reimbursement of $35,000








	
●

	
Acquisition Fee of $110,000 for the American West Potash investment








	
●

	
Public Company Transaction Fee of $650,000 for the Triangle transaction












Buffalo agrees to accept, as payment in full of the Accrued Obligation, 1,516,667 shares of Triangle's common stock upon consummation of the Merger.  Except as modified hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.









[Signature Page Follows]








  





  











  













	 	Sincerely,	 
	 	 	 
	 	BUFFALO MANAGEMENT LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Chad Brownstein	 
	 	 	Chad Brownstein, Manager	 





 



	 	Accepted and Agreed:	 
	 	 	 
	 	PROSPECT GLOBAL RESOURCES INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Patrick Avery	 
	 	 	Patrick Avery, President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-1838
PATRICIA A. ROSS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INCO ALLOYS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, District Judge. (CA-92-192-3) Submitted: December 5, 1995 Decided: March 19, 1996 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia A. Ross, Appellant Pro Se. John Earl Jenkins, Jr., JENKINS, FENSTERMAKER, KRIEGER, KAYES & FARRELL, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Appellee pa rtial summary judgment and dismissing her claims of employment discrimination on partial summary judgment and after a bench trial. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm onthe reasoning of the district court. Ross v. Inco Alloys International, Inc. , No. CA-92-192-3 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 5, 1994; Apr. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">St. Locher Medical, P.C., as Assignee of Anthony Alvaranga, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>IDS Property Casualty Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Kopelevich &amp; Feldsherova, P.C. (Galina Feldsherova, Esq.), for appellant.Bruno, Gerbino &amp; Soriano, LLP (Mitchell L. Kaufman, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered January 24, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, alleging that plaintiff and plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear at duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs). Plaintiff opposed the motion. By order entered January 24, 2014, the Civil Court granted defendant's motion.</p><p>As plaintiff argues, defendant's moving papers failed to establish that the first EUO scheduling letter defendant sent to plaintiff had been timely, since defendant stated that the letter was sent more than 30 days after defendant had received the claims (<a href="../2015/2015_51220.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Neptune Med. Care, P.C. v Ameriprise Auto &amp; Home Ins.</i>, 48 Misc 3d 139</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51220[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2015]; <a href="../2015/2015_50476.htm" target="_blank"><i>O &amp; M Med., P.C. v Travelers Indem. Co.</i>, 47 Misc 3d 134</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 50476[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2015]). Moreover, defendant's moving papers did not demonstrate that the claims had been timely denied (<a href="../2009/2009_02589.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Westchester Med. Ctr. v Lincoln Gen. Ins. Co.</i>, 60 AD3d 1045</a> [2009]). In view of the foregoing, defendant failed to demonstrate its entitlement to summary judgment based upon plaintiff's failure to comply with a condition precedent to coverage (<a href="../2006/2006_09604.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720</a> [2006]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA AND SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<p>Decision Date: July 14, 2017</p><br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 31.1







CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2013-3 Owner Trust
(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the unaffiliated party Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.







Date: June 10, 2014





|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                                                                                                               | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
of American Honda Finance Corporation
(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         September 12, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 6, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 50 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2017-191, CP2017-292.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-19276 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### NYCTL 1999-1 Trust et al., Respondents, v 114 Tenth Avenue Assoc., Inc., Appellant, and Carlton Capital Corp., Intervenor-Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Submitted February 4, 2008;

decided February 19, 2008

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.