# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Filed: September 18, 2020

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

BRADLEY R. WILSON, * UNPUBLISHED

*

* No. 1 9

- 554 V

Petitioner, *

v. * Special Master Gowen

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Decision on Stipulat ion;

AND HUMAN SERVICES * Influenza ( “ flu ” ); Transverse

* myelitis.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Hsien C. Ch ang, McGehee , Chang, Barnes, Landgraf, Houst on, T X, for petitioner,

Mary E. Holmes, U.S. D ept. of Justice, Washingto n, D.C., for respondent.

DECISION ON STIPULATION 1

On April 15, 2019, Bradley R. Wi lson ( “ petitioner ” ) filed a petition for compensation

under the Na tional Vaccine Injury Progr am

. 2 Petition (ECF No. 1). Pet itioner received an

influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccin ation on September 27, 2018

. Id. at ¶ 2; Stipulation at ¶ 2 (ECF No. 25).

Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving the flu vaccination, he suffered transverse myelitis.

Stipulation at ¶ 4.

On September 18, 2020, respondent filed a stipulation providing that a decision should be

entered awarding compensation to petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 7. R e spondent denies that

petitioner ’ s alleged injury was caused by the flu vacci ne. Id. at ¶ 6. Maintaining thei r respective

1 P ursuant to the E

- Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), b ecause this opinion contains a

reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the website of the United States Court of

Federal Claims. The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7

. This means the

o pinion will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the opinion is posted on the court’s

website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party:

(1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that

includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of

privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the

decision.” Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the

court’s website without any changes. Id.

2 The Nat ional Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine

Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa

- 1 to

- 34 (2012)

(Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in th is decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. §

300aa.2

p ositions, the par ties never theless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and a

decision should be entered awarding compensation to petitioner according to the terms o f the

stipulation attached hereto as Appen dix A. Id. at ¶ 7.

The stipulation awards:

1) A lump sum of $57,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This

amoun t represents compensation for all damages that would be available unde r

42 U.S.C. § 300 aa

- 15 (a).

I adopt the parties’ stip ulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount

and on the terms set forth therein. The Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in

accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas L. Gowen

Thomas L. Gowen

Special Master

3 Entry of judgment is expediated by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule

11(a).