alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The Tiger Lily.

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

May 11, 1882.)

Admiralty — Negligence—Damages.

Where a canal-boat moored at a dock was sunk by the swell caused by a passing steamer going at a high rate oí speed, *Mid,*that the steamer is liable in damages for the loss.

*Oscar Frisbie,*for libellant.

Benedict, D. J.

This action is brought to recover of the steamboat Tiger Lily for injury done to the canal-boat Mountain City by the suction of the Tiger Lily in passing. The accident occurred just above the High bridge in the Harlem river. The Tiger Lily was at the time upon a regular trip up the river, and about to land at a dock some 200 feet above the bridge, on the Westchester side of the river. The canal-boat, laden with coal, was moored- above the bridge, on the New York side of the river, but below the steam-boat’s landing, with her stern just clear of the bridge. The course of the Tiger Lily was through the middle arch of the bridge, past the place where the canal-boat lay, and to her dock just beyond, the tide then being low. The canal-boat lay in water some nine feet deep. She was made fast by nine lines running in various directions, and, so far as I am able to discover, all necessary precautions were taken to enable her to resist any reasonable force of the water created by any passing steam-boat. When the Tiger Lily passed, on the occasion in question, she created a suction so strong that the fastenings of the canal-boat were parted, her deck and combings being broken by the strain of the hawsers, and she thrown over upon the rocks about the abutment of the bridge and seriously injured. The force which broke the canal-boat adrift was the suction of the -water caused by the action of the wheels of the Tiger Lily, she being a side-wheel boat. No fault is to be found in the Tiger Lily for.passing through the center arch of the bridge — no other course was open to her; but I must conclude, from all the circumstances, that she was in fault for keeping up too great speed in passing the canal-boat.

*745The position of the canal-boat was known; while lying in the same place the Tiger Lily had passed her on the same day without doing any damage. The narrowness of the channel made it incumbent on the Tiger Lily, at low ebb-tide, to use all possible precaution to avoid doing damage to a vessel moored where the canal-boat was. The pilot of the Tiger Lily, who is the only witness called in her behalf, and who is contradicted by the libellant, says that his boat was slowed down as much as possible before she reached the bridge. But he also says that her wheels are small, and when going at half speed she creates no swell. On this occasion she did create a suction strong enough to part six of the canal-boat’s lines, some three and some four inch lines, and to break up the combings and start the deck. These facts compel the inference that the wheels of the steam-boat were on this occasion kept moving with more power than was necessary to enable her to pass the bridge and reach her landing. Because of this fault, I hold her responsible for the damage to the libellant’s boat.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2451 

To restore certain provisions of the Banking Act of 1933, commonly referred 

to as the ‘‘Glass-Steagall Act’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2011 

Mr. HINCHEY (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. 

WOOLSEY, and Mr. CAPUANO) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To restore certain provisions of the Banking Act of 1933, 

commonly referred to as the ‘‘Glass-Steagall Act’’, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Glass-Steagall Restora5 tion Act of 2011’’. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2451 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTORING PROVISIONS OF THE GLASS-STEAGALL 

2 ACT. 

3 (a) LIMITATION ON AFFILIATION.—The Banking Act 

4 of 1933 (12 U.S.C. 221a et seq.) is amended by inserting 

5 before section 21 the following section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 20. LIMITATION ON AFFILIATION. 

7 ‘‘After the end of the 1-year period beginning on the 

8 date of the enactment of the Glass-Steagall Restoration 

9 Act of 2011, no member bank shall be affiliated in any 

10 manner described in section 2(b) with any corporation, as11 sociation, business trust, or other similar organization en12 gaged principally in the issue, flotation, underwriting, 

13 public sale, or distribution at wholesale or retail or 

14 through syndicate participation stocks, bonds, debenture, 

15 notes, or other securities: except that nothing in this sec16 tion shall apply to any such organization which shall have 

17 been placed in formal liquidation and which shall transact 

18 no business except such as may be incidental to the liq19 uidation of its affairs.’’. 

20 (b) LIMITATION ON COMPENSATION.—The Banking 

21 Act of 1933 (12 U.S.C. 221 et seq.) is amended by insert22 ing after section 31 the following section: 

23 ‘‘SEC. 32. LIMITATION ON COMPENSATION. 

24 ‘‘No officer, director, or employee of any corporation 

25 or unincorporated association, no partner or employee of 

26 any partnership, and no individual, primarily engaged in 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2451 IH

1 the issue, flotation, underwriting, public sale, or distribu2 tion, at wholesale or retail, or through syndicate participa3 tion, of stocks, bonds, or other similar securities, shall 

4 serve the same time as an officer, director, or employee 

5 of any member bank except in limited classes of cases in 

6 which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Sys7 tem may allow such service by general regulations when 

8 in the judgment of the said Board it would not unduly 

9 influence the investment policies of such member bank or 

10 the advice it gives its customers regarding investments.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

        Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Philip L.
Jones, as Chief Operating Officer of Profile Technologies, Inc., hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2006 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Profile
Technologies, Inc.


Date:  February 8, 2007                             /s/ Philip L. Jones
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Philip L. Jones
                                                    Chief Operating Officer
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of R.C., a child, * From the 326 th District

Court of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 7944

- CX

.

No. 11

- 16

- 00023

- CV * July 14, 2016

* Memorandum Opinion by Willson

, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t here is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the order

of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the “Report”) of Marine Harvest ASA (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on the date hereof, Alf-Helge Aarskog, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ivan Vindheim, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Alf-Helge Aarskog          |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Name: Alf-Helge Aarskog        |   |
| Title: Chief Executive Officer |   |
| Date: April 30, 2014      |   |
|                           |   |
|                           |   |
| /s/ Ivan Vindheim              |   |
| Name: Ivan Vindheim            |   |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |
| Date: April 30, 2014      |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

        Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Philip L.
Jones, as Chief Operating Officer of Profile Technologies, Inc., hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Profile
Technologies, Inc.


Date:  February 14, 2005                       /s/ Philip L. Jones
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Philip L. Jones
                                               Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Alejandro Ochoa , Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Therapeutics Ltd. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1)

   the annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: September 8, 2017 /s/ Alejandro OchoaAlejandro OchoaChief Executive Officer
   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Pacific Therapeutics Ltd. and will be retained by Pacific Therapeutics Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 3


---