alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, October 12, 2017. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                     Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be held Thursday, October 12, 2017, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Otis Simpson. For more information please contact Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW., Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues. Otis Simpson. For more information please contact Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW., Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

The agenda will include a discussion on various letters, and other issues related to written communications from the IRS.

Dated: September 4, 2017.

Antoinette Ross,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2017-19197 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Lawrence and others *v.*Morrisania Steam-Boat Co.

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

October *24,*1881.)

1. (Repairs to Vessel — Contract—Performance:

L. & Co., shipwrights, made an. offer, by letter, to the JM. Steam-boat Oo. to repair one of their steam-boats, which was accepted, and L. *&*Co. proceeded to do the work. Payments on áccount were made while the work was in progress, and a note for the .-balancé of the bill given. Payment of the note at maturity was refused on the ground that the contract had not been fully performed. L. & Co. filed a libel to recover the balance claimed to be due, and the company in their answer set up a special agreement to make the boat stiff and strong as new, and remedy, the defect which made her “cranky,” apd nonperformance thereof. *Held,*that the special agreement was not found by the testimony;. that the written contract in the letter was the only one by which to determine the right of the parties; and, the terms of that having been performed, the libellants were entitled to be paid the balance due.'

In Admiralty.

*Scudder é Carter,*for libellant.

. *T„ C. Cronin,*for libellee. '

Benedict, D. J.

Upon the testimony there- is little room to doubt that the libellant is entitled to recover the portion of his bill for work done upon the defendant’s steam-boat, Shady Side, that remains unpaid. The letter of the libellant, dated April 10, 1880, contains a statement of the work he offered to do. The defendants, by their letter of April 14, 1880, accepted the libellant’s offer as made. These two letters constitute a written contract by which alone the rights of the parties must be determined. These letters contain nothing in the shape of a warranty on the part of the libellant that the alteration he proposed to make in the boat’s hull would make her stiff, and remedy the existing defect in her build, and for that reason it must be held that, the special agreement set up in the answer has not been'' proved. This view of the matter in controversy renders it unnecessary to pass upon the conflicting testimony given in respect to conversations and negotiations had prior to the reduction of the contract to'writing. It should, however, be said that the acts of the parties subsequent to the acceptance of the libellant’s offer are in harmony with the view I have adopted, and confirm me in the opinion that the libellant has performed his contract and is entitled to be paid the sum claimed in the libel..

Let a decree be entered to that effect.
ADDENDUM TO LICENSE AND
SUPPLY AGREEMENT
 
 
 This
Agreement is made and effective this 20th day of
February, 2009, by and between Amarillo Biosciences, Inc., a Texas corporation
with its principal place of business at 4134 Business Park Drive, Amarillo,
Texas 79110 (hereinafter “AMAR”), and Cytobiotech, Inc. with its principal place
of business at 6F., No.6, Sec.1, Jhongshing Rd.,Wugu Shiang, Taipei county
24872, Taiwan (hereinafter “CYTOB”).
 
 RECITALS
 
 AMAR and
CYTOB are parties a License and Supply Agreement dated February 6, 2009 with
view of AMAR’s and CYTOB’s cooperation and collaboration in the development and
commercialization of oral applications of interferon in humans and
animals.
 
 THEREFOLRE,
AMAR and CYTOB agree as follows:
 
 The
licenses fee and stock purchased by CYTOB in the License and Supply Agreement
dated February 6, 2009 shall be assigned to the countries in the Territory by
human population in the World Almanac 2009 (World Almanac Books, Reader’s Digest
Association, 1 Reader’s Digest Road, Pleasantville, NY 10570-7000) such that
seventy-two percent (72%) of the value of the license fee and stock purchase is
attributed to China and Taiwan and one and thirty-five hundredths percent
(1.35%) is attributed to Malaysia.  This calculation is made for the
purpose of sending notices of “first right of refusal” to Cytopharm and
Bumimedic, respectively.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed by their respective authorized officers as of the Effective
Date.
 
 
 AMARILLO
BIOSCIENCES, INC.
 
 
 By:/s/
Joseph M. Cummins
 Joseph M. Cummins,
 President and Chief Executive
Officer
 
 
 CYTOBIOTECH,
INC.
 
 
 By:/s/
Jason C. Chang
 Jason C. C Chang,
 Chief
Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         166,860
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  870,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                   138,110
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               979,536
<PP&E>                                         1,087,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                 396,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,008,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,106,772
<BONDS>                                        7,601,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,988
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,293,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,008,657
<SALES>                                        4,019,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,019,022
<CGS>                                          1,839,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,839,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               112,972
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             724,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (978,382)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (978,382)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (978,382)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.15)
        


</TABLE>
#### In re Ade O. OGUNJOBI, petitioner.

No. 10-322.

Nov. 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit 32.1


Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Marcus & Millichap, Inc. Pursuant to


Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with this Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Hessam Nadji, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven F. DeGennaro, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her or his knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:February 27, 2024/s/ Hessam NadjiHessam NadjiPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date:February 27, 2024/s/ Steven F. DeGennaroSteven F. DeGennaroChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1850 as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








I
      hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that the
      accompanying Form 10-QSB of CN Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly
      period ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information
      contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company








/s/
      Michael T. Storm


Michael
      T. Storm


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      6, 2006










This
      certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
      document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any
      reason other than as specifically required by law.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15286 and #15287; Iowa Disaster Number IA-00073]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Iowa (FEMA-4334-DR), dated 08/27/2017. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/19/2017 through 07/23/2017.
 DATES: Issued on 08/27/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/26/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/28/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 08/27/2017, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Allamakee, Bremer, Buchanan, Chickasaw, Clayton, Fayette, Mitchell The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15286B and for economic injury is 152870. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2017-19020 Filed 9-7-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES LEONARD RUSSELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 200 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES LEONARD RUSSELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 201 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ JERRY LEE MAYS, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. CHRIS RANKINS, Respondent - Appellee. No. 22-5047 (D.C. No. 4:22-CV-00225-GKF-JFJ) (N.D. Okla.)

________________ _________________ ORDER DENYING CERTIFIC ATE OF APPEALABILITY *

________________ _________________ Before HOLMES , EID , and ROSSMAN , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Jerry Lee Mays, an Oklahoma prisoner proceeding pro se, 1 seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal from the district court’s determination that his most recent 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application is an unauthori zed second or successive § 2254 application that it lacked jurisdiction to consider. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A ). Mr. Mays has filed an application for a COA, and what appears to be a supplement to his application. Having reviewed both pleadings, we de ny a COA and dismiss this appeal.

* This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
1 Because Mr. Mays appears pro se, we liberally construe his filings. Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & Janer , 425 F.3d 836, 8 40 (10th Cir. 2005). But we do not make arguments for pro se litigants or otherwise advocate on their behalf. Id. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### August 23, 2022 Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court Appellate Case: 22-5047 Document: 010110728329 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 Page: 12 To obtain a COA, Mr. Ma ys must show “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition st ates a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason woul d find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Mr. Mays previously sought relief under § 2254 and was unsuccessful. See Mays v. Dinwiddie , 441 F. App’x 575, 576, 577 (10th Ci r. 2011). He has not obtained this court’s authorization. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3 )(A) (“Before a second or successive application permitted by this sect ion is filed in the district court, the applicant shall move in the appropriate court of appeals for an orde r authorizing the district court to consider the application.”). No reasonabl e jurist would find it debatable that the district court was correct in its procedural ruling that his mo st recent application was an unauthorized second or successive application, a nd the court properly dismissed it. See In re Cline , 531 F.3d 1249, 1251 (10th Cir. 2008). We deny a COA and dismiss this matter. We note that Mr. Mays filed a motion for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs and fees, then attempted to file a second such motion that is largely iden tical to the first. We grant his first motion, and deny the second as moot. Entered for the Court

CHRISTOPHER M. WOLPERT, Clerk Appellate Case: 22-5047 Document: 010110728329 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 Page: 2
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of 1

Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L.

Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-4195

___________

Anthony Wayne Profit, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * District of Minnesota.

County of Hennepin, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: June 3, 1997

 Filed: June 6, 1997 

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Wayne Profit, a Minnesota inmate, appeals from the district court's1

dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Hennepin County.

After reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, we agree with the district court that

Profit essentially attacks the legality of his imprisonment, and that his claim thus must

be brought in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, after he exhausts his state remedies. See
-2-

Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 487-90 (1971); see also Kruger v. Erickson, 77

F.3d 1071, 1073 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Profit's motions for appointment of

counsel and for "Collateral [R]elief."

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### HATHAWAY MOTORS, Inc., et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al.

Civ. A. No. 5072.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

March 4, 1955.

*360Sydney Alderman, New Haven, Conn., Malkan & Ellner, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Frederick H. Wiggin, of Wiggin & Dana, New Haven, Conn., Henry M. Hogan, Gen. Counsel, Gen. Motors Corp., Detroit, Mich., for defendants.

SMITH, Chief Judge.

 General Motors has moved for summary judgment under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. as an alternative to its motion to dismiss, D.C., 18 F.R.D. 283. It does not appear as a matter of law that GM is entitled to a judgment on the pleadings as they now stand. See Dictograph Products, Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, 2 Cir., 1954, 217 F.2d 821, for a recent decision in the exclusive-dealing franchise field. The affidavit of Mr. Hufstader may not be considered at this point in the absence of opportunity of plaintiffs to prepare by discovery procedure to meet the issues raised thereby.

GM has moved to dismiss as a class action under Rule 23 because facts are not alleged demonstrating that it is a class action and that the plaintiffs will adequately represent the class. Plaintiff Hathaway and his counsel, Arnold Malhan, have filed affidavits in opposition, claiming they will fairly represent the independent dealers allegedly damaged by the defendants. The plaintiffs have not sufficiently detailed the nature and extent of the class. The action may be dismissed as a class action.

Motions to strike and for more definite statement are in disfavor. See Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d Ed., Vol. 2, p. 2317 and Richardson & Sons v. Conners Marine Co., 2 Cir., 1944, 141 F.2d 226, 228. If the motion to strike were granted, the complaint would all but disappear.

The motions of General Motors for summary judgment, for separate statements and to strike are denied. The motion to dismiss as a class action is granted.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
F. McAree, Vice President, Finance and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Caliper.

August 9, 2004

                                                             /s/ Peter F. McAree
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                                 Peter F. McAree
                                                     Principal Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Caliper's under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.