alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo)Prudential

 

 

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

RE:         **RBS 2013-C15**

Period: **January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019(the “Reporting Period”)**

 

**AnnualCompliance Statement**

 

 

I,Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity as President and Managing Director ofPrudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify with regard tothe Company’s role as Sub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the“Agreement”) dated as of August 1, 2013, pertaining to the above-referencedcertificates, that:

 

(i)      areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the periodnoted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement duringthe relevant period has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii)    to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

(iii)   to the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligations under itssub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

(iv)    the Company hasmaintained an effective internal control system over the servicing of mortgageloans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

(v)    theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification, or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

 

Effectiveas of February 21, 2020

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James Harrison SINGLETARY, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-7367.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 25, 2008.

James Harrison Singletary, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Harrison Singletary seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his *523Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appeal-ability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Singletary has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as an
officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI Surgical), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SRI on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of SRI Surgical.



|                   |  |     |  |                                         
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Christopher A. Carlton              
|                   |  |     |  | Christopher A. Carlton                  
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer                 
|                   |  |    
|Date: May 11, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gregory B. Reeves                   
|                   |  |     |  | Gregory B. Reeves *                     
|                   |  |     |  | Vice President of Finance and Controller

---

|* | Mr. Reeves is acting as the Companys principal financial officer until the Company engages a new Chief Financial Officer to replace its former CFO, who resigned earlier
this year.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2

        Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Philip L.
Jones, as Chief Operating Officer of Profile Technologies, Inc., hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Profile
Technologies, Inc.


Date:  February 14, 2006                      /s/ Philip L. Jones
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Philip L. Jones
                                              Chief Operating Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

h1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147699

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147699

COA: 310331

Wayne CC: 11-012587-FH

ROBERT DARYL THREAT,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 24

- 00054

- CV

___________________________

Origi nal Proceeding

352nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 352

- 340517

- 23

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### S HANNON 

### B ROOKS 

### , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : February 7, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             715
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,306)
<INVENTORY>                                     27,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,844
<PP&E>                                          16,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,938)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,416
<BONDS>                                         37,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,318
<SALES>                                         79,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,409
<CGS>                                           52,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,539
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,425
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    115
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,310
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) ofTriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James P. Labe, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
Exhibit 10.2


 


 





 


December 28, 2010


 


 


To:


Lion Lam Diamond Corporation


14520 Memorial Drive, suite M206


Houston, Texas 77079


 


 


 


Dear Board of Director:


 


Our Company is pleased to supply EGL certified diamonds to your
firm on these terms and conditions:


 


(a) There is no minimum order requirements from your firm.


 


(b) We can offer any EGL certified diamonds based on 55%-65%
off Rapaport Price sheet.


 


(c) All EGL certified diamonds are subject to availability and prior
sales.


 


(d) The payment will be made by wire transfer .


 


(e) Any stone that we be sent could be returned within 2 weeks
for a full refund.


 


 


Thank you for choosing our firm as your supplier of fine diamonds.


 


 


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/ Adi Danous


 


 


 


 


 


2050 N Stemmons Frwy # 7537 Dallas TX
75207       ad.diams@gmail.com
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2429 

To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement to obtain 

a hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with 

a fuel tank containing 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel 

fuel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 6, 2011 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement 

to obtain a hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with a fuel tank containing 3,785 

liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel fuel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ENDORSEMENT EX4 EMPTION. 

5 (a) EXCLUSION.—Section 5117(d)(1) of title 49, 

6 United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

8 the end; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2429 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period 

2 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(D) a service vehicle carrying diesel fuel 

5 in quantities of 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or 

6 less that is— 

7 ‘‘(i) driven by a class A commercial 

8 driver’s license holder who is a custom har9 vester, an agricultural retailer, an agricul10 tural business employee, an agricultural 

11 cooperative employee, or an agricultural 

12 producer; and 

13 ‘‘(ii) clearly marked with a placard 

14 reading ‘Diesel Fuel’.’’. 

15 (b) EXEMPTION.—Section 31315(b) of title 49, 

16 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

17 following: 

18 ‘‘(8) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ENDORSEMENT

19 EXEMPTION.—The Secretary shall exempt all class A 

20 commercial driver’s license holders who are custom 

21 harvesters, agricultural retailers, agricultural busi22 ness employees, agricultural cooperative employees, 

23 or agricultural producers from the requirement to 

24 obtain a hazardous material endorsement under part 

25 383 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, while 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2429 IH

1 operating a service vehicle carrying diesel fuel in 

2 quantities of 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less if 

3 the tank containing such fuel is clearly marked with 

4 a placard reading ‘Diesel Fuel’.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2016

TOMMY RAY COMBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusASHE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, a group of defendants consisting of Ashe County Health Department, Mary Elizabeth Lyon Smith, M.D., former director Carl Tuttle, present directorDaniel Staley, Wanda Elliott, nurses supervisor, Governor James B. Hunt, Charles D. Reed, State Pharmacist, H. David Bruton, M.D., Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services of N.C., Betty Chisley, Department of Civil Rights Office of DHHS, Washington, DC, Congressman Richard Burr, Kathy B. Manship, Leslie J. Mann, Marie A. Chretien, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CA-99-64-5-V) Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Tommy Ray Combs, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Tommy Ray Combs appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action filed pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Combs v. Ashe County Health Dep’t , No. CA99-64-5-V (W.D.N.C. July 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41140 Summary Calendar

JOSE RODRIGUEZ CRUZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus PETER GONZALEZ CRUZ; JAVIER V. LOPEZ; THOMAS CURRI; JOAN HIGGINS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

UDC No. L-96-CV-21

- - - - - - - - - - March 18, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Texas state prisoner Jose Rodriguez Cruz, no. 681066, has filed a motion to supplement the record on appeal and to suspend the briefing notice. The district court dismissed with prejudice Cruz’s federal civil action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The district court correctly found Cruz’s complaints regarding cruel and unusual punishment to beNo. 97-41140 -2- barred by the relevant statute of limitations. See Gartrell v. Gaylor , 981 F.2d 254, 256-57 (5th Cir. 1993); Spina v. Aaron , 821 F.2d 1126, 1128-29 (5th Cir. 1987). The district court also construed Cruz’s claim that he was held for two and a half years in the custody of the Immigration and Naturalization Services as a habeas claim challenging the constitutionality of the detention procedures of 8 C.F.R. § 212.12. The district court did not err by denying the claim as lacking in merit. See Gisbert v. U.S. Attorney General , 988 F.2d 1437, 1446-48 (5th Cir. 1993). Finally, the district court did not err by denying Cruz’s request for relief from future INS custody following his release from Texas state custody as not presenting a live case or controversy.
See Bailey v. Southerland , 821 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir. 1987). Because there is no meritorious issue that Cruz could raise regarding the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his action, Cruz’s appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. His motion is DENIED as unnecessary. We caution Cruz that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Cruz is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
EX-34.13
(logo) pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland
Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association ("Midland" or the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial
mortgage-backed securities transactions (the "Platform"), as of December 31,
2013 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),
1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors
that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 24, 2014


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106
T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES—OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of TeleTech Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to her knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)         the Form 10–Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Regina M. Paolillo  |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   | Regina M. Paolillo           |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer      |

 

Date: August 5, 2015

 

----