alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

        CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                           OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Mary E. Thomas, the Acting Principal Financial Officer of Le@p Technology,
Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Le@p Technology, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the
equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2004


/s/ Mary E. Thomas
------------------
Mary E. Thomas
Acting Principal Financial Officer
GREGORY LONDON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4559

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 14, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Gregory London, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Lonni L. Dieck, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ohio Phase-In-Recovery Funding LLC (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by Ohio Power Company, as Servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013 between Ohio Phase-In-Recovery Funding LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer, in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and the related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





6. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee.


Date: March 30, 2017/s/ Lonni L. DieckName:  Lonni L. DieckTitle: Treasurer and Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function, Ohio Power Company, as Servicer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of OCI Partners LP (the Partnership) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Bakker, President and Chief Executive Officer of OCI GP LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                                    
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 12, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Frank Bakker                                   
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Frank Bakker                                       
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer              
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | OCI GP LLC (the general partner of the Partnership)

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Partnership specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 232 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that August 30, 2015, be observed 

as ‘‘1890 Land-Grant Institutions Quasquicentennial Recognition Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2015 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. BROWN, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. 

PERDUE, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. WARNER, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. 

ISAKSON, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. 

PORTMAN, Mr. COONS, Mr. CARPER, and Mr. COTTON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 

Nutrition, and Forestry 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that August 30, 2015, 

be observed as ‘‘1890 Land-Grant Institutions 

Quasquicentennial Recognition Day’’. 

Whereas the Act of August 30, 1890 (7 U.S.C. 321 et seq.), 

popularly known as the ‘‘Second Morrill Act’’, led to the 

creation of 19 historically Black Federal land-grant educational institutions; 

Whereas the 19 historically Black 1890 land-grant universities are identified as Lincoln University, Alcorn State 

University, the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, 

Alabama A&M University, Prairie View A&T University, 

Southern University, Virginia State University, Kentucky 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 232 IS 

State University, the University of Maryland-Eastern 

Shore, Florida A&M University, Delaware State University, North Carolina A&T University, Fort Valley State 

University, South Carolina State University, Langston 

University, Tennessee State University, Tuskegee University, Central State University, and West Virginia State 

University; 

Whereas the Act of May 8, 1914 (7 U.S.C. 341), popularly 

known as the ‘‘Smith-Lever Act’’, provided for the establishment of the Cooperative Extension Service within the 

Department of Agriculture for the dissemination, through 

Federal land-grant institutions, of information pertaining 

to agriculture and home economics; and 

Whereas appropriate recognition should be given to the contributions made by the 19 historically Black Federal 

land-grant institutions to the heritage, educational development, and agricultural strength of the United States: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) August 30, 2015, should be designated as 

3 ‘‘1890 Land-Grant Institutions Quasquicentennial 

4 Recognition Day’’; 

5 (2) such day should be observed with appro6 priate ceremonies and activities to recognize the col7 lective contributions that these institutions have 

8 made to the United States; 

9 (3) the Second Morrill Act and the Smith-Lever 

10 Act have helped the United States develop agricul11 tural leaders; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 232 IS 

1 (4) the Department of Agriculture and the Na2 tional Institute of Food and Agriculture should re3 main committed to supporting the goals of the Sec4 ond Morrill Act and the Smith-Lever Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

DIAMANTE ALFRED, AKA Alfred, AKA 

Diamante Deshon, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-10244 

D.C. No. 

1:12-cr-00160-LJO-SKO-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2020**

Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Diamante Alfred appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges 

the 60-month sentence imposed upon his second revocation of supervised release. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Alfred’s 

request for oral argument is denied.

FILED

MAR 6 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-10244 

Alfred contends that the district court improperly based the sentence on an 

earlier promise to impose the statutory maximum term if Alfred violated 

supervised release, rather than an individualized sentencing determination. He also 

contends that the district court’s purported predetermination of his sentence 

required the court’s recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455 and the Due Process Clause. 

We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 

1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that there is none. Though the district court 

referred during the revocation hearing to its earlier promise that a violation of 

supervised release would result in imposition of the statutory maximum term, the 

district court considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) factors and properly based the 

sentence on the need to protect the public, Alfred’s multiple breaches of the court’s 

trust, and a determination that Alfred was not amenable to supervision. See United 

States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062 (9th Cir. 2007). Further, contrary to 

Alfred’s contention, the district court’s explanation of its decision to impose the 

statutory maximum sentence was adequate. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 

984, 992-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). This record does not support Alfred’s 

argument that the court’s decision to impose the 60-month sentence was based on 

improper bias, and the district judge did not plainly err by failing to recuse himself. 

See United States v. Rangel, 697 F.3d 795, 804 (9th Cir. 2012). 

Alfred next contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. The 
3 19-10244 

district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 

51 (2007). The above-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of 

the § 3583(e) sentencing factors and totality of the circumstances, including 

Alfred’s poor performance on supervision and the nature of his violations. See 

Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.

AFFIRMED.
exhibit45.htm


Exhibit 4.5

















INSTRUMENT OF ASSUMPTION


Air Quality Revenue Refunding Bonds


(Columbus Southern Power Company Project), Series 2009A







THIS INSTRUMENT OF ASSUMPTION, dated December 31, 2011, is entered into by OHIO POWER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation (the “Company”).







RECITALS












1.           Columbus Southern Company, an Ohio corporation (“CSP”), has heretofore entered into the Loan Agreement dated as of August 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”), by and between the Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, a political subdivision, body politic and corporate duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the Constitution and laws of the State of Ohio (the “Issuer”) and CSP, pursuant to which CSP is obligated to make certain payments related to the Air Quality Revenue Refunding Bonds (Columbus Southern Power Company Project), Series 2009A issued by the Issuer under the Indenture of Trust dated as of August 1, 2009 (as heretofore and hereafter amended or supplemented, the “Indenture”), with The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (the “Trustee”).







2.           On the date hereof, CSP merged into the Company.







3.            Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated December 31, 2011 among the Company and CSP, and Ohio Revised Code §1701.82, the Company became responsible and liable for all the liabilities and obligations of CSP when the merger became effective and thereby unconditionally assumed the due and prompt performance of all of the obligations of CSP under the Agreement in accordance with Section 5.8.


 



	
4.  

	
This Instrument of Assumption is being executed pursuant to Section 5.8 of the Agreement.












NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT KNOWN that, in consideration of the premises and of other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company DOES HEREBY ASSUME all of the obligations of CSP under the Agreement and unconditionally assumes the due and prompt performance of all of the obligations of CSP under the Agreement in accordance with Section 5.8.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Instrument to be executed as of the day and year first above written.


 







OHIO POWER COMPANY







/s/ Renee V. Hawkins


By: Renee V. Hawkins


Title: Assistant Treasurer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2318 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to increase the amount of the Medal of Honor special pension 

provided under that title by up to $500. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2011 

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself, Mr. WEST, Mr. MACK, Mr. STUTZMAN, Mr. 

MARCHANT, Mr. JONES, Mr. GRIFFITH of Virginia, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mr. BONNER, Ms. HAYWORTH, Mr. FORBES, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. 

FORTENBERRY, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. CARTER, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. 

TIPTON, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. BURGESS, and Mr. NEUGEBAUER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to increase the amount 

of the Medal of Honor special pension provided under 

that title by up to $500. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medal of Honor Sti5 pend Increase Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2318 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 TO INCREASE MEDAL OF HONOR SPECIAL 

3 PENSION. 

4 (a) AUTHORITY TO INCREASE RATE OF SPECIAL

5 PENSION.—Subsection (a) of section 1562 of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2)(A) Subject to the availability of appropriations 

11 for this purpose in advance in an appropriations Act, the 

12 Secretary may increase the rate of the special pension oth13 erwise in effect under paragraph (1) by not more than 

14 $500. 

15 ‘‘(B) The Secretary may not increase the rate of a 

16 special pension under subparagraph (A) after the Sec17 retary has expended all the funds specifically provided for 

18 such purpose in an appropriations Act. 

19 ‘‘(C) The authority under subparagraph (A) expires 

20 on September 30, 2013.’’. 

21 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (f)(1) 

22 of such section is amended by striking ‘‘this section’’ and 

23 inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(1)’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Advance Agreement







Party A: Honest Best Int’1 Ltd.


Party B: Fancy Think Limited







The Advance Agreement is signed on March 29, 2011 by both parties, to record the following advance transactions:







- On the date of the advance agreement, Party A (Honest Best Int’1 Ltd.) agreed to advance a short-term loan amounted to US$61,570,000 to Party B (Fancy Think Limited).







- The loan charges interest at 3.95% per annum, unsecured and repayable on Party A’s demand.







Party A:                      Honest Best Int’1 Ltd.








	
Authorised Signature:

	
	  	
Sole Director












Party B:                      Fancy Think Limited








	
Authorised Signature:

	
	  	
Director







 


Date:  March 29, 2011
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Clayton Mountain, LLC; * From the 29th District Court

Clayton Mountain Resort, LLC; of Palo Pinto County,

Independent Subcontractors, LLC; Trial Court Nos. C46164-3 & C46164-4

Premium Sandstone Group, LLC;

Premium Sandstone Supply, LLC;

Ramrock Holdings, LLC; Sundance 

Tiny Homes, LLC; Clayton Mountain 

Construction, LLC; Arenisca Holdings, 

LLC; Clayton Mountain Group, LLC;

Clayton Mountain Holdings, LLC; Clayton 

Mountain Management, LLC; Discount Stone, 

LLC; Pastoraska Holdings LLC; 7R Club, 

LLC; Sundance Club Food and Beverage, LLC;

and Sundance Club Hospitality, LLC,

Vs. No. 11-20-00034-CV * August 5, 2021

Suzann Ruff, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

error in the orders below. We reverse the portions of the trial court’s January 16, 

2020 and February 18, 2020 orders in which it awarded attorney’s fees to Suzann 

Ruff and render judgment that Suzann take nothing on her request for attorney’s 

fees. We otherwise affirm the trial court’s January 16, 2020 and February 18, 2020 

orders. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed 50% against 

Appellants and 50% against Suzann Ruff.
Presidential Documents

42927 

Federal Register 

Vol. 82, No. 176 

Wednesday, September 13, 2017 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2017–11 of September 8, 2017 

Continuation of the Exercise of Certain Authorities Under the 

Trading With the Enemy Act 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of the Treasury 

Under section 101(b) of Public Law 95–223 (91 Stat. 1625; 50 U.S.C. 4305 

note), and a previous determination on September 13, 2016 (81 FR 64047, 

September 16, 2016), the exercise of certain authorities under the Trading 

With the Enemy Act is scheduled to expire on September 14, 2017. 

I hereby determine that the continuation of the exercise of those authorities 

with respect to Cuba for 1 year is in the national interest of the United 

States. 

Therefore, consistent with the authority vested in me by section 101(b) 

of Public Law 95–223, I continue for 1 year, until September 14, 2018, 

the exercise of those authorities with respect to Cuba, as implemented by 

the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515. 

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to publish this 

determination in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 8, 2017 

[FR Doc. 2017–19522 

Filed 9–12–17; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4811–33–P 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCSTrump.EPS</GPH>