alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FS Investment Corporation III (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), Michael C. Forman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Lawson, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Form 10-K of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: March 11, 2016  
|                       
|/S/ MICHAEL C. FORMAN  
|Michael C. Forman      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/S/ MICHAEL LAWSON     
|Michael Lawson         
|Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellant,

v.

RUPERT ROLLE
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 3598

[ June 8, 2016 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Kenneth A. Gottlieb , Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 9912

MM10A

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Eliot Lupkin of Law Offices of Eliot J. Lupkin & Associates, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

The State challenges the trial court’s order holding unconstitutional section 796.07(6), Florida Statutes (2013), which imposes a mandatory civil fine of $5,000 for a violation of section 796.07(2)(f), Florida Statutes, prohibi ting soliciting prostitution. We have previously held that the statutory fine is constitutional. See State v. Jones , 180 So. 3d 1085, 1090 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2015); State v. Sookraj , 182 So. 3d 886, 887 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2016); State v. Trotman , 186 So. 3d 43, 43 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2016). Appellee’s attempts to distinguish these cases are meritless. We reverse and remand for imposition of the fine.

C IKLIN
, C.J., W ARNER and G ERBER
, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Jorge ALDEA also known as Fat George Jorge Aldea, Appellant.

No. 06-4413.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Jan. 11, 2008.

Opinion Filed Jan. 15, 2008.

*423Ewald Zittlau, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for United States of America.

J. Michael Farrell, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

BEFORE: FISHER, HARDIMAN and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

*OPINION OF THE COURT*

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Jorge Aldea was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to distribute in excess of five kilograms of cocaine. The District Court found that he conspired to distribute over 150 kilograms of cocaine and sentenced Aldea pursuant to the then mandatory Sentencing Guidelines to 280 months of incarceration. On appeal, with *Blakely*and *Booker*having been decided in the interim, we affirmed Aldea’s conviction but remanded for resentencing. We ruled as follows:

> Jorge Aldea argues that his sentence of 280 months exceeded the maximum possible sentence supported by the jury verdict and, thus, violates *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). He also argues that, because he committed his offense before the Supreme Court decided *Booker,*the Ex Post Facto clause prevents imposition of a sentence that includes any enhancement. Having determined that *Booker*issues are best resolved by the District Court in the first instance, we will vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with that opinion. (Citations omitted.)

*United States v. Jorge Aldea,*174 Fed. Appx. 52, 60 (Not Precedential).

On remand, the District Court rejected Aldea’s argument that imposition of a sentence greater than 151 months of incarceration would be unlawful and sentenced him to 240 months. This appeal followed.

Aldea insists that the District Court’s 240 month sentence violated his Due Process right to pi’otection from an *ex post facto*increase in punishment. Aldea candidly acknowledges, however, that we have held to the contrary in *United States v. Pennavaria,*445 F.3d 720 (3d Cir.2006), and explains that he is pursuing this appeal in order to be in a position to seek review in the Supreme Court of the United States.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

###### Celerity Partners SBIC, L.P.

          - [License No. 09/79-0445]

Notice is hereby given that Celerity Partners SBIC, L.P., 11150 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 1470, Los Angeles, CA 90025, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the sale of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act, Section 107.730(a), you must not self-deal to the prejudice of a Small Business, the Licensee, its shareholders or partners, or SBA., and Section 107.730(e)(3), Associate must not receive any income or anything of value from the Portfolio Concern unless it is for your benefit, with the exception of director's fees, expenses, and distributions based upon the Associate's ownership interest in the Concern. The transaction is brought within the purview of Sections 107.730(a) and 107.730(e)(3) of the Regulations because which constitutes Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules. Celerity Partners SBIC, L.P. proposes to sell eStudy Site Inc. (“eSS), 292 Euclid Ave, Suite 225, San Diego, California 92114, with NRI Clinical Research (“NRI”) and, Meridien Research, Inc. (“Meridien”). Because the Associates, Mark Benham and Matt Kraus, will receive proceeds from their investments and carried interests from Meridien and NRI, and a transaction fee, this transaction constitutes Conflict of Interest requiring SBA's prior written exemption.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on this transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2017-19484 Filed 9-13-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
EX‐34.3

 

(logo) pwc

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the *Enterprise!*LoanManagement System (the “Platform”), as of December31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Companyhas determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform.Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company'scompliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testingof selected servicingactivities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 25, 2016

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106 

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
EX 35.5


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2013-CCRE10 Mortgage Trust
    Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 7, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with Starwood Waypoint Residential Trusts (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2013 (the Report), I, Nina A. Tran, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 28, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ NINA A. TRAN       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Nina A. Tran           
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a closed meeting on Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(7), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

Commissioner Piwowar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session.

The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: September 13, 2017.

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-19918 Filed 9-14-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
LOSS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1
<CASH>                                       12,826
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 3,378 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             79,999 
<PP&E>                                       11,419 <F1> 
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              426,707 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     2,219,753 
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                   2,500
<COMMON>                                     10,455
<OTHER-SE>                               (1,806,001)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                426,707
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                             0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            949,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          408,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,319,114)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,319,114)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (1.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
<FN>
<F1> NET AMOUNTS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Judy Knox, Also Known as Judith Knox, Appellant.

Submitted December 3, 2007;

decided February 12, 2008

Motion for leave to appeal denied upon the ground that an appeal lies as of right. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6695

FRED WRIGHT, JR; GREGORY DONNELL MEBANE,

Petitioners - Appellants,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-536-2, CA-97-538-2)

Submitted: January 12, 1999 Decided: February 10, 1999

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Wright, Jr., Gregory Donnell Mebane, Appellants Pro Se.

Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH

CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Fred Wright, Jr. and Gregory Donnell Mebane appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on their petitions filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinions accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wright v. North

Carolina Attorney Gen., Nos. CA-97-536-2; CA-97-538-2 (M.D.N.C.

Apr. 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON A PPELLANT ’ S

M OTION FOR EN B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Ivan Villarreal v. Texas Southern University; Dannye Holley, in his

Individual & Official Capacities; Edward Mald onado (A/K/A SpearIt),

in his Individual & Personal Capacities; Gabriel Aitsebaomo, in his

Individual & Personal Capacities

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00867

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 64945

Trial court: 164 th District Court of Harris County

Dat e motion filed: February 14, 2019

Party filing motion: Appellees, Texas Southern University; Dannye Holley, in his

Individual & Official Capacities; Edward Maldonado (A/K/A SpearIt),

in his Individual & Personal Capacities; Gabriel Aitsebaomo, in his

Individual & Personal Capacities

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/

___ Richard Hightower

____________________________ _______ Acting Individually Acting for the Court

En banc court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Higley, Lloyd, Goodman,

Hightower, and Countiss.

Justices Kelly and Landau not sitti ng.

Date: April 25, 2019
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013, by andamong RBS COMMERCIAL FUNDING INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, asGeneral Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer and Co-op SpecialServicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC., as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administratorand as Custodian, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series WFRBS 2013-C15 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) , and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled allof its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1

    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying Form
10-QSB of CN Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information contained in the Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company


/s/Jan W. Clark

Jan W. Clark
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 16, 2005