alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


EXHIBIT 10.7 – Sublet Agreement




Sublet Agreement




It is mutually agreed on this date ___7/1/10________ between Landlord/Agent

_______6/30/11_____________________




and Sublessor(s)(Original Tenant(s))

__The Diversified Group__________________

__Partnership Management, LLC___________

________/s/____________________________

and Sublessee(s) (New Tenant(s))

___American Realty Funds Corporation______

________/s/____________________________

_____________________________, that all the rights and

duties described below shall be transferred to Sublessee(s) for the term of the sublet agreement specified below. The sublessee acknowledges receipt of the original lease and agrees to be bound by the terms of the original lease consistent with this sublet agreement effective__7-1-10_____(date of beginning of sublease).




Description of Lease and Premises




Address of Rental Unit _501 W. Eulicid Avenue, Bay City, MI 48706_________________________

Term of Original Lease __5/15/10__________ to _____5/14/11______ (beginning and ending dates)

Term of Sublease ____7/1/10_________ to _____6/30/11_________ (beginning and ending dates)




Provisions of Sublet Agreement

A. Choose one of the following:

[X]

The sublessee(s) shall be liable for the full rent of the sublessor(s) in the amount of

$_5,000___________ per month.

[  ]

The sublessee(s) shall be liable for part of the rent of the sublessor(s) in the amount of

$_________er month. Sublessor(s) shall remain liable for the remaining $____________ per

month.

B. Choose one of the following:

[  ]

The sublessor(s) shall be relieved of all liability and the original lease is assigned to the

sublessee(s) effective ______________(date). Note: Any sublessor’s release from liability must be approved by the landlord.

[X]

The sublessor(s) shall remain liable under the original lease.

C. Choose one of the following:

[  ]

The sublessee(s) shall pay a security deposit in the amount of $____________ to be held by

_______________________. Note: In the cities of Madison and Fitchburg, no single party

may require a security deposit from tenants if the combined total is more than one month of the original lease’s rent.

[X]

The sublessee(s) shall pay no security deposit.













			
	Tenant Resource Center, Inc. • (608) 2570006/(877) 238 RENT (7368)

	 
	 9/05
#### In re Vincent F. RIVERA, Petitioner.

No. 06-7608.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 15, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 27, 2006.

Vincent F. Rivera, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(e).

PER CURIAM.

Vincent F. Rivera petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to accept his complaint for filing and challenging the validity of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2000), which was amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. We conclude that Rivera is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Additionally, mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re United Steelworkers,*595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979).

The relief sought by Rivera is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny Rivera’s motion objecting to the terms of the Prison Litigation Reform Act and deny the petition for writ of mandamus. Rivera’s motion to expedite is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2451 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2451

  To restore certain provisions of the Banking Act of 1933, commonly 
   referred to as the ``Glass-Steagall Act'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 7, 2011

  Mr. Hinchey (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Inslee, Mr. DeFazio, Ms. 
  Woolsey, and Mr. Capuano) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To restore certain provisions of the Banking Act of 1933, commonly 
   referred to as the ``Glass-Steagall Act'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Glass-Steagall Restoration Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. RESTORING PROVISIONS OF THE GLASS-STEAGALL ACT.

    (a) Limitation on Affiliation.--The Banking Act of 1933 (12 U.S.C. 
221a et seq.) is amended by inserting before section 21 the following 
section:

``SEC. 20. LIMITATION ON AFFILIATION.

    ``After the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the 
enactment of the Glass-Steagall Restoration Act of 2011, no member bank 
shall be affiliated in any manner described in section 2(b) with any 
corporation, association, business trust, or other similar organization 
engaged principally in the issue, flotation, underwriting, public sale, 
or distribution at wholesale or retail or through syndicate 
participation stocks, bonds, debenture, notes, or other securities: 
except that nothing in this section shall apply to any such 
organization which shall have been placed in formal liquidation and 
which shall transact no business except such as may be incidental to 
the liquidation of its affairs.''.
    (b) Limitation on Compensation.--The Banking Act of 1933 (12 U.S.C. 
221 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 31 the following 
section:

``SEC. 32. LIMITATION ON COMPENSATION.

    ``No officer, director, or employee of any corporation or 
unincorporated association, no partner or employee of any partnership, 
and no individual, primarily engaged in the issue, flotation, 
underwriting, public sale, or distribution, at wholesale or retail, or 
through syndicate participation, of stocks, bonds, or other similar 
securities, shall serve the same time as an officer, director, or 
employee of any member bank except in limited classes of cases in which 
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may allow such 
service by general regulations when in the judgment of the said Board 
it would not unduly influence the investment policies of such member 
bank or the advice it gives its customers regarding investments.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1




Annual Servicer’s Certificate


Provided by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


to Holders of Notes and Certificates









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Michael J. McConnell, Vice President of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The undersigned has caused a review, under his supervision, to be made of i) the activities; and ii) the performance under the Agreement (as defined below), of the Company during the period from July 30, 2013 through March 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”); and




(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligations in all material respects under the Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.




This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Section 4.09(a) of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, in its individual capacity and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2013-B Owner Trust.




Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 16th day of June, 2014.




/s/Michael J. McConnell________________


Michael J. McConnell


Vice President
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00192-CV

In re Harris Corporation, Harris IT Services Corporation, Digital Display Networks, Inc.,

and 7-Eleven Inc., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief.

Tex. R. App. 52.8, 52.10. We grant relators’ motion for emergency relief and stay all proceedings

in the trial court, pending further order of this Court. The Court orders that the real party in interest

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before April 3, 2013.

It is ordered on March 20, 2013.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur L. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
  1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2)
the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  By
/s/ Arthur L. SmithArthur L. SmithPresident andChief Executive OfficerJune 13, 2011
exhibit102123110.htm


Exhibit 10.2

SIXTH ALLONGE


TO


PROMISSORY NOTE


FROM


HEMAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC.


AND


REAGENTS APPLICATIONS, INC.


PAYABLE TO THE ORDER OF TIFUNDING LLC


IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF


$1,000,000


DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2002


(the “Promissory Note”)


 


Recitals


 


A.  TiFunding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, acquired all of the right, title and interest in and to the Promissory Note from Bay Bank, FSB effective February 7, 2011.


 


B.  The make and the holder now desire to make certain revisions to the Promissory Note.


 


WITH THE CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND HOLDER, the Promissory Note identified in the caption above is hereby amended as follows.


 


1.  Bank. “Bank” shall mean TiFunding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.


 


2.  Maturity Date. “Maturity Date” shall mean February 28, 2012, subject to acceleration as provided in the Promissory Note.


 


3.  Principal Amount. The maximum principal sum available under the Promissory Note shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000).


 


4.  Interest Rate. Section 2 of the Promissory Note is hereby deleted and superseded in its entirety by the following: “2. Interest Rate. Interest on all advances outstanding from time to time shall accrue at the annual compounded rate of nine percent (9%).”


 


5.  Interpretation.  The Promissory Note shall be read, interpreted and construed to give effect to the terms of the Sections above, which shall supersede and control any contradictory or conflicting terms in the original Promissory Note.


 


6.  Effect of Allonge.  Except for the change of terms set forth in the Sections above, all other terms and conditions of the Promissory Note shall remain in full force and effect.  This Allonge shall not extinguish, terminate, affect, nor impair the Borrower’s obligations under the Promissory Note, and shall not extinguish, terminate, impair or otherwise affect the lien and security interest created under the Loan Documents.  All terms used in this Allonge not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings ascribed to those terms in the Promissory Note.  This Allonge forms an integral part of the Promissory Note to which it is attached and made a part of, and the two shall be read together as one instrument.


 


Executed effective as of the 7th day of February, 2011.


 


HEMAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC.







By: /s/Catherine M. Davidson         


Name:  Catherine M. Davidson


Title:   Controller 




 


TIFUNDING LLC







By: /s/ L.T. Shaw               


Name:  L. T. Shaw


Title: Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                   <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JUN-30-1999         JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1999         MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                  18,510,013          15,191,896
<SECURITIES>                                     0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                           13,219,953          13,874,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                56,000              53,239
<INVENTORY>                                      0                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        31,835,728          29,918,771
<PP&E>                                   6,518,737           5,405,795
<DEPRECIATION>                          (4,377,440)         (2,687,453)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          35,761,651          36,955,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   14,090,220           6,046,688
<BONDS>                                          0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                      0                   0
<COMMON>                                   126,597             121,180
<OTHER-SE>                              21,544,834          30,213,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            35,761,651          36,955,605
<SALES>                                          0                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        22,890,942          21,867,172
<CGS>                                    7,076,862           6,156,751
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           14,583,967          19,640,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,764,064          (3,259,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                               148,000             201,117
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      1,616,064          (3,460,772)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0          (1,902,311)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0                   0
<CHANGES>                                        0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,616,064          (5,363,083)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.13               (0.46)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.13               (0.46)
        


</TABLE>
|Exhibit 32.2
        CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald Rosner, Director of Finance and Administration of the Company, and its principal financial officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|    |                                                                                                                                                     

| | /S/ Ronald Rosner            
| | -----------------------------
| |             
| | Ronald Rosner                
| | Director of Finance          
| | and Administration           
| | (Principal Financial Officer)
| | Schick Technologies, Inc.    
| | February 10, 2005            

|19
|--
1

The Honorable Henry Edward Autrey, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1793

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Ferdinand McGuire, * [PUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 21, 2008

Filed: May 8, 2008

___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ferdinand McGuire appeals from the district court’s1

 order denying his motion

for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment

706 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (USSG), which reduced the

base offense levels in USSG § 2D1.1(c) based on the quantity of cocaine base (crack).

 McGuire pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base,

acknowledging that he was accountable for a quantity of 5.19 grams of that substance,
-2-

which subjected him to a minimum mandatory sentence of 60 months’ imprisonment.

See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B); USSG § 5G1.1(c)(2). Accordingly, McGuire is not

entitled to a reduction under the retroactive amendment. See USSG §

1B1.10(b)(2)(A); id., cmt. n.1(a)(ii); United States v. Peters, No. 08-1672, slip op. (8th

Cir. Apr. 29, 2008).

The judgment is summarily affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1448 (Opposition No. 91/157,313) IN RE BOSE CORPORATION,

Appellant. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office,

Trademark and Trial Appeal Board.

ON MOTION

ORDER Bose Corporation moves without opposition for leave to file a reply appendix. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

## MAR 11 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk FED U.S. COURT OF ILAPPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Charles Hieken, Esq. Raymond T. Chen, Esq. s19 MAR 1 1 2009

JAN HORBAIY DIRK
Exhibit 10.10


 


AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE








	
DATE OF NOTE:

	
September 7, 2011


	  	  
	
MAKER:

	
RICHFIELD OIL & GAS COMPANY


	  	  
	
HOLDER:

	
MACKOV INVESTMENTS LIMITED


	  	  
	
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT:

	
$89,500


	  	  
	
INTEREST:

	
2.0% per month beginning September 29, 2011


	  	  
	
DUE DATE:

	
September 29, 2011












In exchange for an additional loan of $11,500 (including a fee equal to $1,000) made on or about September 14, 2011, the parties hereby agree that the Note shall be amended as follows:








	
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT:

	
$101,000


	  	  
	
DUE DATE:

	
January 31, 2012












Except as amended hereby the Note shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have set their hands, effective as of September 28, 2011.








	
HOLDER:

	  	
MAKER:


	
MACKOV INVESTMENTS LIMITED

	  	
RICHFIELD OIL & GAS COMPANY


	  	  	  	  	  
	
By:

	
/s/ Glenn MacNeil

	  	
By:

	
/s/ J. David Gowdy


	  	
Glenn MacNeil

	  	  	
J. David Gowdy, President & CEO