alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2471 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2471

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend section 2710 of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that 
a video tape service provider may obtain a consumer's informed, written 
 consent on an ongoing basis and that consent may be obtained through 
                             the Internet.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    Section 2710(b)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:
            ``(B) to any person with the informed, written consent 
        (including through an electronic means using the Internet) in a 
        form distinct and separate from any form setting forth other 
        legal or financial obligations of the consumer given at one or 
        both of the following times--
                    ``(i) the time the disclosure is sought; and
                    ``(ii) in advance for a set period of time or until 
                consent is withdrawn by such consumer;''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2471

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend section 2710 of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that 
a video tape service provider may obtain a consumer's informed, written 
 consent on an ongoing basis and that consent may be obtained through 
                             the Internet.
```
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CALIPERLIFE SCIENCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

 

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E. Kevin Hrusovsky,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to therequirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

(2)                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
|                   | /s/ E. KEVIN HRUSOVSKY                 |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                   |                                   |
|                   | E. Kevin Hrusovsky                     |
|                   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                   | (Principal Executive  Officer)         |
|                   |                                   |
|                   |                                   |
| Date: May 5, 2010 |                                   |

 

1

----
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

COMMUNITY CENTRAL BANK CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q (continued)

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                             Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
                                  June 30,            June 30,
                             ------------------   ----------------
                                2006     2005      2006      2005
                              -------   ------    ------   -------
                             (in thousands, except per share data)
<S>                          <C>        <C>       <C>      <C>
BASIC
Net Income                     $  631   $  830    $1,334    $1,582
/ Weighted Average Shares       3,829    3,588     3,821     3,471
                               ------   ------    ------    ------
Basic Earnings Per Share       $ 0.16   $ 0.23    $ 0.35    $ 0.46
                               ======   ======    ======    ======
DILUTED
Net Income                     $  631   $  830    $1,334    $1,582
/ Weighted Average Shares       3,895    3,686     3,887     3,566
                               ------   ------    ------    ------
Diluted Earnings Per Share     $ 0.16   $ 0.23    $ 0.34    $ 0.44
                               ======   ======    ======    ======
</TABLE>

Notes:

-    Weighted average shares outstanding have been adjusted to reflect the 5%
     stock dividend in June of 2006.


                                       35
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ending April 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur L. Smith, President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C, ss. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,





1)
              the
                  Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
              the
                  information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                  the
                  financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.





By
      /s/
      Arthur L. Smith


Arthur
      L.
      Smith


President
      and


Chief
      Executive Officer


June
      13,
      2008
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas.



By:

/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 19, 2016
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1088
EMMETT JOHNSON JAFARI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN RUSSELL GOOD, M.D.; MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE; MARY M.H. PRIDDY, Esquire; THOMAS J. MARKOW, Chief Judge, Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-825) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 20, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emmett Johnson Ja fari, Appellant Pro Se. Anisa Patrice Kelley, FISCELLA, KELLEY & MOONEY, Richmond, Virginia; Franklin Brawner Greer, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia; Alice Ann Berkebile, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jafari v. Good , No. CA-96-825 (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Danny WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Respondent.

No. 2008-3021.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 4, 2008.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Danny Williams’ motion for reconsideration of the court’s November 30, 2007 order dismissing his petition for review for failure to pay the docketing fee, the docketing fee now having been paid,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The mandate is recalled, the dismissal order is vacated, and the petition for review is reinstated.

(2) If no certified list is filed by the arbitrator within 14 days of the date of filing of this order, the parties should confer to determine the record on review and Williams’ brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order. If a certified list is filed within 14 days of this order, then Williams should calculate his brief due date from the date of service of the certified list.
#### In the Matter of: Reed E. SLATKIN, Substantively Consolidated Affiliates Topsight Oregon, Inc. and Reed Slatkin Investment Club, L.P. (Reorganized Debtors), Debtor. Donald L. Simons, and Karen A. Simons, a.k.a Karen Ritz, Appellants, v. R. Todd Neilson, Trustees of the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Estate of Reed E. Slatkin, Appellee.

No. 09-55759.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed June 21, 2010.

Christopher Blank, Law Office of Christopher L. Blank, Newport Beach, CA, for Appellants.

John Reitman, Esquire, Andrew S. Rotter, Peter J. Mastan, Esquire, Gumport, Reitman & Montgomery, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellee.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Donald L. and Karen A. Simons appeal from the district court’s order dismissing *635their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment against them in an adversary proceeding. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review for an abuse of discretion the dismissal of an appeal for failure to prosecute, *Nat’l Bank of Long Beach v. Donovan (In re Donovan),*871 F.2d 807, 808 (9th Cir. 1989), and we reverse and remand.

The district court dismissed sua sponte after the Simonses failed to timely file documents in support of their appeal. However, the Simonses had requested a short extension to file their opening brief, the court failed to warn of dismissal or to consider less drastic sanctions, and there was no showing of prejudice to the appel-lee. Thus, we reverse and remand. *See id.*at 808-09 (concluding that dismissal of appeal was an abuse of discretion where Bankruptcy Appellate Panel failed to consider alternative sanctions); *Moneymaker v. CoBen (In re Eisen),*31 F.3d 1447, 1451 (9th Cir.1994) (explaining five factors courts must consider before dismissal, including prejudice to opposing party and alternative sanctions, and noting that in sua sponte dismissals “there is a closer focus on the failure to consider less drastic alternatives and the lack of warning of imminent dismissal” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **Certification
        of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1850 as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 I
        hereby
        certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that the
        accompanying Form 10-QSB of CN Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly
        period ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information
        contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
        financial condition and results of operations of the Company
 
 
 /s/
        Jan W. Clark
 Jan
        W.
        Clark
 President
        and Chief Executive Officer
 May
        1,
        2006
 
 
 
 
  This
        certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
        and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
        document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for
        any
        reason other than as specifically required by law.
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 14 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission regulating broadband Internet access. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2015 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Federal Communications Commission regulating 

broadband Internet access. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fed4 eral Communications Commission relating to regulating 

5 broadband Internet access (published at 80 Fed. Reg. 

6 19737 (April 13, 2015)), and such rule shall have no force 

7 or effect. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Jun REN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-71349.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 2007 *.

Filed Jan. 3, 2008.

Danning Jiang, Esq., Law Offices of Danning Jiang, San Jose, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Donald A. Couvillon, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*807Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jun Ren, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal, and request for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Ren’s untimely filing of his asylum application should be excused. *See 8*C.F.R. § 208.4(a)(5).

We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s and BIA’s denial of Ren’s withholding of removal claim on the basis on an adverse credibility finding. *Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 992 (9th Cir.2003).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s and BIA’s denial of the withholding of removal claim based on an adverse credibility determination. Ren testified inconsistently with the testimony he gave at the asylum interview regarding whether he was arrested and harmed in China, and regarding significant details of the harm he allegedly suffered. *See Pal v. INS,*204 F.3d 935, 940 (9th Cir.2000).

Ren’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same testimony that the IJ and BIA found not credible, and Ren points to no other evidence that he could claim the IJ and BIA should have considered. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir.2003).

We conclude that Ren’s due process rights were not violated by the IJ’s decision to admit the asylum officer’s assessment and notes, because their admission did not make the hearing “so fundamentally unfair that [Ren] was prevented from reasonably presenting his case.” *See Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19158]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-2376-000]


GenOn Holdco 9, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of GenOn Holdco 9, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 25, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d0b081f0e0223212423281e383d3d223f390d2b283f2e632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbfdfee9f8f4d5d7d2d5dee8cecbcbd4c9cffbdddec9d895dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a> or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: September 5, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19158 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KINTE L. FORD,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 95 EAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         863
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                42290
<ALLOWANCES>                                   403
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                      121076
<DEPRECIATION>                                4903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              179446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         8
<OTHER-SE>                                   39033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                179446
<SALES>                                      27971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             29797
<CGS>                                        24104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                24391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1232
<INCOME-TAX>                                   378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            854
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   854
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .11


</TABLE>