alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
FILED AS A PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000887150        
<NAME>                          CHARLES W. CLAYTON
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<CURRENCY>                      US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-27-1998  
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1       
<CASH>                              438 
<SECURITIES>                      1,011 
<RECEIVABLES>                    23,598 
<ALLOWANCES>                     (3,874)
<INVENTORY>                      47,157 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 72,467 
<PP&E>                           40,153 
<DEPRECIATION>                  (24,929)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  105,428 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            28,988 
<BONDS>                          19,316 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0 
<PREFERRED>                           0 
<COMMON>                            423 
<OTHER-SE>                       55,327 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    105,428 
<SALES>                          54,779 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 54,957 
<CGS>                            45,289 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    45,289 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 11,595 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  606 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,533)
<INCOME-TAX>                        575 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,958)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0 
<CHANGES>                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (0.48)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE U.S. CODE
  1.
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the
Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Terence E. HallTerence E. HallChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerSuperior Energy Services, Inc.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Anthony S. Sadowski, Jr., Deceased. Michele Lippa Gartner, Respondent; Joseph A.F. Sadowski, Appellant.

Submitted December 24, 2007;

decided February 7, 2008

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*9 NY3d 987 (2007)].
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463.

*Name of Committee:*                         Safety and Occupational Health Study Section (SOHSS), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).                    

*Date:*                         October 31-November 1, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., CST.                    

*Place:*                         The Wit Hotel, 201 North State Street, Chicago, Illinois 60601.                    

*Agenda:*                         The meeting will convene to address matters related to the conduct of Study Section business and for the study section to consider safety and occupational health-related grant applications.                    

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Price Connor, Ph.D., NIOSH Health Scientist, CDC 2400 Executive Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30345, (404) 498-2511,                         *spc3@cdc.*

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 2017-19500 Filed 9-13-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit
No. 03-1717 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. ARIES D. CRUDUP, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA The opinion of this Court, issued on July 7, 2004, should be amended as follows: On page 8, line 9: replace "is" with "was"; On page 8, line 10: insert "by" before comma after "abrogated"; On page 8, line 11: replace "as relevant evidence that" with "in determining whether".
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2302 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to notify Congress of conferences sponsored by the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2011 

Mr. STUTZMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to notify Congress of conferences sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION TO CONGRESS OF CON4 FERENCES SPONSORED BY THE DEPART5 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 5 of title 

7 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new section: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2302 IH

1 ‘‘§ 517. Notification to Congress of conferences spon2 sored by the Department 

3 ‘‘(a) NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 180 days before 

4 the date on which a covered conference begins, the Sec5 retary shall notify the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of 

6 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Vet7 erans’ Affairs of the Senate of such conference, including 

8 the estimated costs to the Department. 

9 ‘‘(b) REPORT ON COSTS.—Not later than 60 days 

10 after the date on which a covered conference ends, the Sec11 retary shall submit to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

12 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

13 Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate a report that includes an 

14 accounting of the final costs of the conference to the De15 partment. 

16 ‘‘(c) COVERED CONFERENCE DEFINED.—In this sec17 tion, the term ‘covered conference’ means a conference, 

18 meeting, or other similar forum that is sponsored or co19 sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs and is— 

20 ‘‘(1) held for a period of three or more days, 

21 beginning at the time of initial on-site registration 

22 and ending at the time the final event is completed; 

23 ‘‘(2) attended by 20 or more individuals, includ24 ing one or more employees of the Department; or 

25 ‘‘(3) estimated to cost the Department at least 

26 $5,000, including costs related to— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2302 IH

1 ‘‘(A) transportation and parking; 

2 ‘‘(B) per diem payments; 

3 ‘‘(C) lodging; 

4 ‘‘(D) rental of halls, auditoriums, or other 

5 spaces; 

6 ‘‘(E) rental of equipment; 

7 ‘‘(F) refreshments; 

8 ‘‘(G) entertainment; 

9 ‘‘(H) contractors; and 

10 ‘‘(I) brochures or other printed media.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

12 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

13 after the item relating to section 516 the following: 

‘‘517. Notification to Congress of conferences sponsored by the Department.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Procopio RAMIREZ-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50900

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 12, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Procopio Ramirez-Gomez (Ramirez) raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *petition for cert. filed*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). Ramirez has served his term of incarceration and has been removed from the United States. Ramirez also raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by *United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis,*483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir.), *petition for cert. filed,*(June 25, 2007) (No. 06-12082), which held that an appeal of a sentence is moot when the appellant has been removed and is barred from entering the United States. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is DENIED. The appeal is DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 31.1



I, Patrick J. Dalton, Chief Executive Officer of Fifth Street
Senior Floating Rate Corp., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended September 30, 2016 of Fifth Street Senior Floating Rate Corp.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Dated this 30th day of January, 2017.



|By: | /s/ Patrick J. Dalton   | 
|--- | ----------------------- | 
|    | Patrick J. Dalton       | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer |
#### Barker *v.*Todd.

*(Circuit Court, N. D. New York.*

November 29, 1882.)

1. Annulment op Decree.

It being made to appear to *the court*by the petition of strangers to the récord that a decree was obtained by collusion between complainant and defendant, it is annulled and the cause dismissed.

2. Barker Patent for Cilain-Pumps.

Vacation of judgment in favor of Barker reissue No. 6,531, for chain pumps, reported in 13 Fed. Rep. 473.

The decision in *Barker v. Todd,*reported in 13 Fed. Rep. 473, has since been set aside upon the application of the L. M. Rumsey Manufacturing Company, and the ease finally disposed of by the following decree.

*Parkinson é Parkinson,*for L. M. Rumsey Manufacturing Company.

*B. ¡I. Buell,*for Barker.

Wallace, J.

This cause having been heard upon the petition of the L. M. Rumsey Manufacturing Company *et al.*to vacate and annul the decree heretofore entered herein, and upon affidavits and arguments of counsel in behalf of the said petitioners and the said complainant, Barker, and it appearing to the court that the proceedings therein were procured by collusion between the complainant, Barker, and the defendant, Todd, and that there was no real controversy between them, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the said decree, to-wit, the decree entered on or about the twelfth day of September, 1882, be and the same is hereby vacated and annulled, and that this cause be dismissed. It is further ordered that said Barker pay the disbursements incurred in the said application for vacation of said decree.
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 296 

Congratulating Army Reserve Major Lisa Jaster on her graduation from 

the Army Ranger School. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2015 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Army Reserve Major Lisa Jaster on her 

graduation from the Army Ranger School. 

Whereas the Army Ranger School (referred to in this preamble as ‘‘Ranger School’’) was established in 1950 during the Korean War to develop elite leaders to command 

difficult combat missions; 

Whereas Ranger School is one of the most challenging training courses for which members of the Armed Forces may 

volunteer; 

Whereas Ranger School pushes the physical and mental limits of students for more than two months; 

Whereas on average— 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 296 IS 

(1) 36 percent of Ranger School students fail the 

course during the first four days after the date on which 

the course begins; and 

(2) only approximately 45 percent of Ranger School 

students ultimately graduate from the course; 

Whereas the Army Reserve is— 

(1) a highly trained force that comprises approximately 20 percent of the total Army; and 

(2) always available to meet the needs of the Army 

and Joint Force; 

Whereas, on August 21, 2015, Army Captain Kristen Griest 

and First Lieutenant Shaye Haver became the first two 

women to graduate from Ranger School; 

Whereas, on October 16, 2015, Major Lisa Jaster became the 

third woman, and the first Army Reserve woman and 

mother, to graduate from Ranger School and earn the 

distinctive black and gold Ranger tab; 

Whereas Major Lisa Jaster overcame the extreme fatigue, 

hunger, and stress involved in Ranger training in order 

to graduate from Ranger School; and 

Whereas Major Lisa Jaster has— 

(1) dedicated her life to serving and protecting the 

United States; 

(2) deployed to both Iraq and Afghanistan; and 

(3) earned the Bronze Star and the Combat Action 

Badge: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors Major Lisa Jaster for the accom3 plishment of becoming the first Army Reserve 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 296 IS 

1 woman and first mother to graduate from Ranger 

2 School; 

3 (2) commends the groundbreaking achievements 

4 of the first three women to graduate from Ranger 

5 School— 

6 (A) Captain Kristen Griest; 

7 (B) First Lieutenant Shaye Haver; and 

8 (C) Major Lisa Jaster; 

9 (3) recognizes the vital role that the Army Re10 serve plays in protecting and defending the United 

11 States; and 

12 (4) celebrates the determination, patriotism, 

13 and willingness to lead of all Ranger School grad14 uates. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Jeffrey T. Slovin, certify that: 1.
I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Schick          Technologies, Inc.;  2.
Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue          statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary          to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which          such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period          covered by this report;  3.
Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial          information
included in this report, fairly present in all material          respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows          of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in the report;  4.
The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for          establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as          defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the          registrant and have:  a)
designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused          such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under          our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating          to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is          made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
         during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)
evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure          controls and procedures and
presented in this report our          conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls          and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
         report based on such evaluation; and  c)
disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants          internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during          the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants          fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
         has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially          affect,
the registrants internal control over financial          reporting; and  5.
The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based          on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial          reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the          registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent          function):  a)
all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the          design or operation of
internal control over financial          reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the          registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report          financial information; and  b)
any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management          or other employees who
have a significant role in the          registrants internal control over financial
reporting.  Date:  November 9, 2005 /S/ Jeffrey T. Slovin

[Signature]
Chief Executive Officer  15
**Exhibit 34.2**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Citibank, N.A.: 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division ofCitibank, N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (*i.e.*, transaction-level reporting initiallyrequired under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately-issued (*i.e.*, for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipmentloan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, as listed in Appendix A of the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agentservices (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities incompliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determinewhether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any othertransactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months endedDecember 31, 2013 is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

February 28, 2014
Exhibit 35.1




Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:
  (1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2013-B Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and
  (2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
  This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 15th day of June, 2016.


/s/ Mark Kaczynski_________________


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer