alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS OF LTI HOLDINGS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         159,128
<SECURITIES>                                 1,694,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,873,269
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,873,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,904
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,851
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,763,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,873,269
<SALES>                                        553,002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               553,002
<CGS>                                          399,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  399,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               727,483
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (841,809)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (841,809)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.30)


</TABLE>
| (logo)ncb

National Cooperative Bank

 

2011 Crystal Drive

Suite, 800

Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

February 6, 2018

 

RBS Commercial Funding, Inc.as Depositor

600 Washington Blvd.

Stamford, CT 06901

 

RE:     Annual Statement as to Compliance

           WFRBS 2013 C15

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2013-C15, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerlyNCB, FSB (the “Co-op Special Servicer”), I hereby certify that:

 

a.     A review of theactivities of the Co-op Special Servicer during the preceding calendar year(the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.     To the best of myknowledge, based on these reviews, the Co-op Special Servicer has fulfilled allobligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

Please note that the annualfinancial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31,2018.

 

 

Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President,Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank,N.A.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THERESA RUEBBLING, Individually and

as Heir of VICTORIA RANGEL, Deceased,

Appellant,

v.

FOREMOST COUNTY MUTUAL

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00054-CV

Appeal from

421st Judicial District Court

of Caldwell County, Texas

(TC# 21-O-421)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant all costs of appeal for which let execution issue. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Palafox, and Soto, JJ., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.), sitting by assignment

Palafox, J., dissenting
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-40761

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Clifford Laverne Mecham, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:18-CR-1339-1

Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Clifford Laverne Mecham, Jr., appeals the sentence imposed at 

resentencing for his conviction for possession of child pornography. This 

court previously vacated Mecham’s sentence based on the district court’s 

misapplication of the U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(4)(A) enhancement. Mecham 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 15, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-40761 Document: 00515823889 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2021
No. 20-40761

2

has moved for summary disposition, asserting that 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 2252A(a)(5)(B) and 2256(8)(C) are unconstitutional as applied to him. 

“On a second appeal following remand, the only issue for 

consideration is whether the [district court] reached its final decree in due 

pursuance of [this court’s] previous opinion and mandate.” Burroughs v. FFP 

Operating Partners, 70 F.3d 31, 33 (5th Cir. 1995). Because Mecham’s 

argument challenging the constitutionality of §§ 2252A(a)(5)(B) and 

2256(8)(C) as applied to him is beyond this court’s remand order, we decline 

to consider it. See Burroughs, 70 F.3d at 33. 

Accordingly, Mecham’s motion for summary disposition is 

DENIED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-40761 Document: 00515823889 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/15/2021
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAHR MOHAMED SALEH GOMAA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-74578

Agency No. A095-127-238

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 10, 2010** 

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Sahr Mohamed Saleh Gomaa, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion to reconsider. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of

FILED

SEP 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-74578

a motion to reconsider and de novo claims of due process violations. See CanoMerida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Gomaa’s motion to

reconsider because Gomaa failed to identify any errors of fact or law in the IJ’s

July 12, 2007, order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(2). 

The IJ did not violate Gomaa’s due process rights where Gomaa does not

dispute the IJ allowed her to discuss her options for relief with her attorney and

offered her a short continuance to file an asylum application. See Ibarra-Flores v.

Gonzales, 439 F.3d 614, 620-21 (9th Cir. 2006) (no due process violation exists

unless “the proceeding was so fundamentally unfair that the alien was prevented

from reasonably presenting his case”) (internal quotation marks and citation

omitted); cf. Cano-Merida, 311 F.3d at 964-65 (due process violation where IJ

conducted off-the-record discussion with pro se petitioner and pre-judged the

merits of petitioner’s asylum claim). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |
| Citibank, N.A.                        | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware |
| As AART Indenture Trustee             | As AART Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Kristen Driscoll     | 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200 |
| 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor | Wilmington, DE 19805-1266 |
| New York, NY 10013                    |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | AART 2013-SN1 - Administration Agreement |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Administrator during the period of June 5, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the Administration Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Administrator has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Administration Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0                  21,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                   5,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                    (114)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  27,915
<PP&E>                                               0                   1,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                    (716)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                  30,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                   2,586
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  21,620
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                   6,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  30,485
<SALES>                                          5,603                  15,832
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,603                  15,832
<CGS>                                              523                   1,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      523                   1,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,672                  10,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,684                   4,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                       556                   1,503
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,128                   3,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,128                   3,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15                    0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
2014 OCT 2 ! Ail

A ' VA S I ilGTO.i.4

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, 

DIVISION II

Appellant, 

v. 

DWAYNE PAUL STEWART, 

Respondent. 

No. 44332 -5 -II

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

JOHANSON, C. J. — The State of Washington appeals the superior court' s order amending

Dwayne Paul Stewart' s offender score for his third degree domestic violence ( DV) assault

conviction. The State argues that the superior court should have included Stewart' s other current

offense, a misdemeanor fourth degree DV assault, in the third degree DV assault' s offender score

because under RCW 9.94A.589( 1)( a), the fourth degree DV assault was a "prior conviction for a

repetitive domestic violence offense" for purposes ofRCW 9. 94A.525( 21)( c) ( emphasis added). 

Because Stewart has served the entirety of his sentence and that sentence was identical to

the sentence the trial court originally imposed when Stewart' s offender score included the fourth

degree DV assault, this case is moot. Although this issue could be characterized as a matter of

continuing and substantial public interest, we decline to consider this issue in light of our recent

decision in State v. Rodriguez, No. 44417 -8 -II (Wash. Ct. App., Oct. 7, 2014), which addresses

this identical issue. 
No. 44332 -5 -II

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as moot. 

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, 

it is so ordered. 

We concur:
Exhibit 32.2

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF AXSOME THERAPEUTICS, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report of Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Constance Ames, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: March 24, 2016 | /s/ Constance Ames                                                                       |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Constance Ames Vice President, Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF THIS QUARTERLY REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                       498
<INVENTORY>                                      4,108
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,902
<PP&E>                                           9,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,087
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,327
<SALES>                                          5,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,902
<CGS>                                            2,779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,726
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (957)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (957)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (957)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.5



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the
applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in
his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto)
(the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling
and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC,a Florida limited liability companyBy:

/s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident


Dated: February 23, 2016





1601 Washington Avenue  Suite
700  Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601



---

Schedule I

GSMS 2013-GC10

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-GC10

Ref: Empire Hotel  portion contributed into CGCMT 2013-GCJ11

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich
Street, 5th Floor

New York, NY 10013

Paul Vanderslice

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 17th Floor

New York, NY 10013

Ryan M. OConnor

Citibank, N.A.

Agency and Trust

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York, NY 10013

John Hannon
#### James Robert KOZOMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Grady J. HAYNES, Respondent-Appellee, and State of North Carolina, Respondent.

No. 07-7242.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 24, 2008.

*547James Robert Kozoman, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Robert Kozoman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537*U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kozoman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald Rosner, Director of Finance and Administration of the Company, and its
principal financial officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


                                          /S/ Ronald Rosner
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Ronald Rosner
                                          Director of Finance
                                          and Administration
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)
                                          Schick Technologies, Inc.
                                          November 11, 2003


                                       21