alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1



Deloitte & Touche LLP
333 Clay Street,
Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002

November 8, 2004

Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
333 Clay Street, Suite 3600
Houston, Texas 77002

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial
information of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") for the
quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, as indicated in our report dated
November 8, 2004; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion
on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, is
incorporated by reference in the Company's Registration Statement No. 333-105794
on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of CM Finance Inc (the
Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael C. Mauer, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/    Michael C.
MauerName:

Michael C. MauerDate:

September 6, 2017
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF THE chief FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
(the "Report") of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31,
2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada Jr., the Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                    
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                          
|2) | the information
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|Date: November 25, 2015 | By:    | /s/ Antonio Estrada Jr.
|----------------------- | ------ | -----------------------
|                        | Name:  | Antonio Estrada Jr.    
|                        | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 16 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 16

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2015

  Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Cardin, Mrs. Boxer, Ms. Warren, Mr. 
    Blumenthal, and Mrs. Gillibrand) introduced the following joint 
 resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied 
or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by 
appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
    ``Section 3. This article shall take effect 2 years after the date 
of ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 280 

Recognizing the month of October 2015 as ‘‘National Women’s Small 

Business Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7, 2015 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mrs. FISCHER, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. 

AYOTTE, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. 

PETERS, Mr. ENZI, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. MARKEY, and Mr. COONS) submitted 

the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the month of October 2015 as ‘‘National 

Women’s Small Business Month’’. 

Whereas the Small Business Administration has declared the 

month of October 2015 to be ‘‘National Women’s Small 

Business Month’’ along with the celebration of the anniversary of the signing of the Women’s Business Ownership Act of 1988 (Public Law 100–533; 102 Stat. 2689) 

that established the National Women’s Business Council 

and the Women’s Business Center program; 

Whereas there are over 9,900,000 women-owned small businesses in the United States; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 280 ATS 

Whereas women-owned small businesses collected 

$1,600,000,000,000 in total receipts in 2012, which is an 

increase of 35 percent since 2007; 

Whereas the rate of growth for women-owned employer firms 

is 3 times that of men-owned employer firms; 

Whereas, since 2007, the number of women-owned small 

businesses in the United States has increased by 

2,100,000 and women-owned small businesses have added 

nearly 1,500,000 more jobs; 

Whereas Congress continues to support the National Women’s Business Council and the focus of the National 

Women’s Business Council on alleviating obstacles faced 

by women small business owners and women entrepreneurs; and 

Whereas the celebration of ‘‘National Women’s Small Business Month’’ would honor women small business owners 

and women entrepreneurs and recognize the significance 

of their contributions to the small business community: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the month of October 2015 as 

3 ‘‘National Women’s Small Business Month’’; 

4 (2) honors the vital role of women small busi5 ness owners and women entrepreneurs in the United 

6 States during ‘‘National Women’s Small Business 

7 Month’’; 

8 (3) recognizes the significant contributions of 

9 women small business owners and women entre10 preneurs to the small business community; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 280 ATS 

1 (4) supports and encourages young women en2 trepreneurs to pursue their passions and create more 

3 start-up businesses; 

4 (5) recognizes the importance of creating poli5 cies that promote a business-friendly environment 

6 for small business owners that is free of unnecessary 

7 regulations and red tape; and 

8 (6) supports efforts to increase awareness of 

9 the value of women-owned small businesses on the 

10 economy of the United States. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0622

_____________________________

SHONTAI L. DUNLAP,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

June 5, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Shontai L. Dunlap, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 15, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40748 Summary Calendar In the Matter of: JUAN PEQUEÑO, Debtor.

--------------------------------------------------------- JUAN PEQUEÑO, Appellant,

versus AURORA LOAN SERVICES INC; JOE DE LA FUENTE; MELISSA AVALOS; ENRIQUE PEREZ Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-05-CV-135

-------------------- Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * For the reasons stated by the district court and bankruptcy court below, we AFFIRM. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19672]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date and Time:  Tuesday, September 19, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. and its 
continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on September 20, 
2017.

Place:  999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

Status:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be Discussed:  Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.
* * * * *

Person to Contact for Information:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-19672 Filed 9-12-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7484

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EDUARDO SAENZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:07-cr-00195-RJC-1)

Submitted: April 25, 2019 Decided: April 29, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eduardo Saenz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eduardo Saenz appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Judicial 

Notice Pursuant to Rule 201.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Saenz, No. 3:07-cr-00195-RJC-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 29. 2018). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2013

s1021 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2013

147537

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147537

COA: 309145

Tuscola CC: 07

- 010401

- FH

JAMES HENRY TAYLOR,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Randy VALMER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-10061.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 9, 2008.

Robert L. Ellman, Esq., Brian J. Quarles, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Lloyd George Federal, Patrick M. Walsh, Esq., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael K. Powell, Esq., Dan Maloney, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Reno, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

D.C. No. CR-04-00308-RCJ.

Before: SCHROEDER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and SCHIAVELLI,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable George P. Schiavelli, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing, with Judge Clifton voting to grant that petition. Judge Schroeder and Clifton have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Schiavelli so recommends.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2016 of Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason A. Kulas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/ Jason A. Kulas


Name: Jason A. Kulas


Title: President and Chief Executive Officer





March 2, 2017
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 26, 2021

b0519 

# Order

Clerk May 26, 2021

161746

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161746

COA: 352449

Genesee CC: 08

- 024090

- FC

GEOFFREY LAVAR LAWSON

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 6 , 2020 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Genes ee County Prosecuting

Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this

order. In particular, the prosecuting attorney shall address: (1) whether the presumption

of prejudice to a defendant from a substantive co mmunication with a jury outside the

presence of defense counsel applies when such a claim is brought i n a motion for relief

from judg ment, compare People v France , 436 Mich 138, 143 (1990), with MCR

6.508(D)(3)(b); and (2) if such a presumption applies here, whether trial counsel’s

statement that he had no objection to the court providing the written jury instruction

effectively rebuts that presumption or whether an evidentiary hearing must be held.

The applicat ion for leave to appeal remains pending.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15300 and #15301; PUERTO RICO Disaster Number PR-00030]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4336-DR), dated 09/10/2017. *Incident:*
                         Hurricane Irma. *Incident Period:*
                         09/05/2017 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 09/10/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/09/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/11/2018.
 ADDRESS: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/10/2017, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Culebra, Vieques The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 153008 and for economic injury is 153010. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2017-19572 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AHMED MOSTAFA ELGAAFARY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 102 MAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Unpublished

Memorandum and Order of the Superior Court at No. 478 EDA 2023 entered on January 16, 2024, affirming the PCRA Order of the Chester County Court of Common

Pleas at No. CP

- 15

- CR

- 0003891

- 2018 entered on J anuary 18, 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of August, 2024

, we GRANT the petition for allowance

of appeal, and VACATE the Superior Court’s decision affirming the trial court’s dismissal

of the petitioner’s petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541

- 9546,

without a hearing. We REMAND to Superior Court with instructions to remand to the trial

court for a hearing on the petitioner’s claim of ineffectiveness regarding plea advice,

pursuant to Lafler v. Cooper , 566 U.S. 156 (2012), and Commonwealth v. Steckley , 128

A.3d 826 (Pa. Super. 2015).
Exhibit
10.16

    Purchase
Agreement

    


    Party A:
Meihekou City Hengyide Warehouse Logistics Co., Ltd.

    


    Party B:
Ganzhi Ginseng Products Co Ltd & China Ginseng Holding
Inc

    


    As per
negotiation between Party A and B in relation to the premise located in the
address of a PRC company named in Tonghua Diyuan Grape Wine Co., Ltd., it is
agreed as follow:

    


    1) Party
A and B shall go to the PRC auction company Jilin Mingshi Auction Co. Ltd.
(“Jinlin Mingshi”) together to apply for the change of the
purchaser’s name from Party A to Party B. The application fee is borne by Party
B.

    


    2) All
details/content of the location, land area and facilities that to be acquired
originally by Party A from Jinlin
Minshi remain unchanged. The consideration of RMB 9,000,000 and the agency
commission that to be originally paid by Party A are remain unchanged and shall
be paid by Party B to Party A.

    


    3)
Payment method: This agreement is become effective upon date of signing, Party B
shall pay Party A of RMB 500,000 before 20 March 2010, the remaining balance
shall be repaid in full before end of June 2010.

    


    4) The
consideration of RMB 9,000,000 is calculated with the bank’s lending rate, and
shall be paid by Party B to Party A.

    


    5) Party
A is agreed to waive the rental expenses incurred by Party B for using the
premise for the period from Jan to Feb 2010.

    


    6) If the
remaining balance is not settled within June 2010, Party A has the right to
repossess the premise and confiscate the deposit paid to Party A. And Party B is
liable to compensate Party A for an amount equivalent to 6 month’s rental
expenses for using the premise.

    


    7) Both
parties shall obey the terms set out in this agreement. This agreement comes
into force promptly after the representatives of both parties sign and put on
the seal.

    


    8) This
agreement is made in 2 copies, both parties hold one.

    


    Meihekou
Hengyide Warehouse Logistics Co., Ltd. (with company seal)

    Legal
Representative: (signature)

    


    Jilin
Ganzhi Ginseng Products Co., Ltd (with company seal)

    Legal
Representative: Zhang Yuxiang

    


    China
Ginseng Holdings Inc. (with company seal)

    Legal
Representative: Liu Changzhen
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000487 21-OCT-2016 07:44 AM