alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report onForm 10-K of the COMM 2013-CCRE10 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Actperiodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNRPartners, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant, KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real EstateCapital Markets, Inc.), as Primary Servicer, Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the CertificateAdministrator on and after November 1, 2021, Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian onand after November 1, 2021.

 

 

 

Dated:March 9,2022

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

Helaine M. Kaplan

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM WORLD
CALLNET, INC. REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0001014491
<NAME>                   World Callnet, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                               12
<SECURITIES>                                        500
<RECEIVABLES>                                       634
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    709
<PP&E>                                               79
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (6)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2122
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              8
<OTHER-SE>                                         (832)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1298
<SALES>                                             157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    157
<CGS>                                                 2
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      1497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (38)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1497)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1497)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1497)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0




</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL W. JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, The 

Warden; CHARLOTTE REYNOLS, The 

Superintendent II Cal PIA; C. SMITH, MD 

FACP Chief Physician/Surgeon; SAM 

WONG, Doctor; CRAIG VERNON, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 22-15604 

D.C. No. 2:18-cv-03101-JAM-JDP 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2023**

Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Michael W. Johnson appeals pro se from the district 

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 10 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-15604

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo, Hamby v. Hammond, 821 F.3d 1085, 1092 (9th Cir. 

2016), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Johnson 

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were 

deliberately indifferent to his request to leave work midday to obtain medication 

for his ulcerative colitis. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994) 

(“[T]he official must both be aware of facts from which the inference could be 

drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the 

inference.”); Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1057-60 (9th Cir. 2004) (a prison 

official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an 

excessive risk to inmate health; medical malpractice, negligence, or a difference of 

opinion concerning the course of treatment does not amount to deliberate 

indifference).

Johnson’s motion for an order of default (Docket Entry No. 12) is denied.

AFFIRMED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15298 and #15299; PUERTO RICO Disaster Number PR-00029]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4336-DR), dated 09/10/2017. *Incident:*
                         Hurricane Irma. *Incident Period:*
                         09/05/2017 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 09/10/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/09/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/11/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/10/2017, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*
                     Culebra, Vieques *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* None The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.500Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.750Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.610Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 152988 and for economic injury is 152990. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2017-19573 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2462 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2462

 To limit the aggregate amount provided by the taxpayers of the United 
         States for the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2011

 Mr. Fitzpatrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit the aggregate amount provided by the taxpayers of the United 
         States for the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cap the GSE Bailout Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. REESTABLISHMENT OF MAXIMUM AGGREGATE AMOUNT PERMITTED TO BE 
              PROVIDED BY THE TAXPAYERS TO FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC.

    (a) Maximum Aggregate Amount of Commitment.--No funds may be 
provided by the United States Department of the Treasury or any other 
agency or entity of the Federal Government to either regulated entity 
(as such term is defined in section 1303 of the Federal Housing 
Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 
4502)), as part of the Amended and Restated Senior Preferred Stock 
Purchase Agreement, dated September 26, 2008, amended May 6, 2009, and 
further amended December 24, 2009 (as such agreement may be further 
amended), between the United States Department of the Treasury and the 
Federal National Mortgage Association, or the Federal Home Loan 
Mortgage Corporation, as applicable, under any other agreement between 
either such regulated entity and the Department of the Treasury, or 
otherwise, that exceed a maximum aggregate amount of the greater of--
            (1) $200,000,000,000, or
            (2) $200,000,000,000, plus the cumulative total of 
        deficiency amounts of the regulated entity determined for 
        calendar quarters in calendar years 2010, 2011, and 2012, less 
        any surplus amount determined as of December 31, 2012.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the terms 
``deficiency amount'' and ``surplus amount'' have the meanings provided 
such terms in the applicable Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement 
described in subsection (a), as amended through December 24, 2009.
    (c) Enforcement.--The Administrator of the Federal Housing Finance 
Agency shall take such actions as necessary to prevent each regulated 
entity from requesting or receiving any funds that exceed the limit 
provided in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0677

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

GILBERT CAMPA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 13, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 7 2023

08/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0677
#### In the Matter of Seasia D. Mr. Anonymous et al., Appellants; Kareem W., Respondent.

Submitted January 28, 2008;

decided March 13, 2008

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal granted.
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appe **als**

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 22, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00287

- CR

Sandra MORTIMER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR9808 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Pursuant to a plea

- bargain agreement, Sandra Mortimer pled guilty to driving while intoxicated and was sentenced to ten years in prison and a $2,000.00 fine in accordance with the terms of her plea

- bargain agreement. On April 3, 2014, the trial court signe d a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)( 2). After Mortimer filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See

id. 25.2(d).

“In a plea bargain case .

. . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s recor d, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a

written motion filed and r uled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately

reflect that this is a plea

- bargain case and that Mortimer does not have a right to a ppeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d).

This appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d),

unless an amen ded trial cou rt certification showing that Mortimer has the right to appeal is madepart of the appellate record by June 23, 2014

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State

, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, or der).

We ORDER all appellate deadlines be suspended until further order of the court.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

cou rt on this 22nd day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         September 12, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 6, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 50 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2017-190, CP2017-291.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-19275 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
f8k021111ex10xviii_kurrant.htm


Exhibit 10.18


 


Sales Contract of Shanghai High Definition Technology Industrial Co., Ltd.


 


Contract #: SH10120101



	
Supplier: Shanghai High Definition Technology Industrial Co., Ltd. (“HDTI”)

	 	
Purchaser: Shandong Zhidali Industrial Co., Ltd. (“Zhidali”)


	
Company’s Name: HDTI


Tax ID: 310104749292949


Address: 1018 East Sanliqiao Road, Pudong 


New District, Shanghai


Tel/Fax: 021-61871158


Bank: China Industrial and Commercial Bank Caohejin Development Zone Branch


Bank Account: 1001266319200087156


Zip code: 200125

	 	
Company’s Name: Zhidali


Tax ID: 370481672204284


Address: 1 Zhidali Road, Economy 


Development Zone, Tengzhou City, Shandong Province


Tel/Fax: 0632-3957775/0632-3957770


Bank: China Industrial and Commercial Bank Tengzhou City Branch


Bank Account: 1605003109200334240


Zip code: 277500








	
 


Unless otherwise agreed, the purchase price shall be made in ¥RMB and the parties shall follow the clauses in this Agreement:


 


	
#

	
Name

	
Model

	
Quantity

	
Unit

	
Price (include sales tax)


	
1

	
Modem Chips

	
HD2812

	
27,000

	
Pieces

	
¥17.98


	
Total: RMB ¥485,460








	 	 
	1. 	
Technology/Quality Standards: shall follow the Technology Agreement, Quality Agreement and Sample Quality Standards agreed to by the parties.


	2.	Guaranty: provide the services of repair, exchange and return within one (1) year from the date of sales.
	3.	Quality Inspection, Methods and Grace Period: the Purchaser shall conduct the quality inspection within 5 business days upon receipt of the delivery in the way agreed to by the parties; failure to conduct the inspection as above will be deemed as approval of quality upon inspection.
	4.	Packing: the products shall be packed in a solid, anti-quake/slip/damp way suitable for long distance delivery.
	5.	Delivered Place: the Purchaser shall desire the place for delivery within the territory of China (upon the parties’ agreement) and the costs for delivery and package shall be paid by Supplier.
	6. 	
Delivery Time: within 3 business days upon the receipt of purchase price on Supplier’s bank account, Supplier shall deliver the orders in accordance with the fax order received from the Purchaser.


	7.	Fee Settlement: The purchase price shall be fully paid on or before 01/10/2011.
	8.	
Miscellaneous: this Agreement shall be executed upon the following signatures and seals in two copies.  The fax shall be deemed as of same effect as this Agreement.


 








	
Supplier: HDTI


[Corporate Seal- Seal for Contracts Only]


12/03/2010

	
Purchaser: Zhidali


[Corporate Seal- Seal for Contracts Only]


12/03/2010 [signature]