alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

        Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Philip L.
Jones, as Chief Operating Officer of Profile Technologies, Inc., hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Profile
Technologies, Inc.


Date:  May 15, 2004                   /s/ Philip L. Jones
       ------------                   -----------------------------------------
                                          Philip L. Jones,
                                          Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit 99.1




Annual Servicer’s Certificate


Provided by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


to Holders of Notes and Certificates









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Michael J. McConnell, Vice President of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:
  (1)           The undersigned has caused a review, under his supervision, to be made of i) the activities; and ii) the performance under the Agreement (as defined below), of the Company during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”); and
  (2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligations in all material respects under the Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.
  This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Section 4.09(a) of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, in its individual capacity and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2013-B Owner Trust.
  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 15th day of June, 2016.


/s/Michael J. McConnell________________


Michael J. McConnell


Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 43321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19481]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 27

[WT Docket No. 06-150; DA 17-810]


Service Rules for the 698-746, 747-762, and 777-792 MHz Bands; 
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission is correcting a document 
that appeared in the Federal Register on September 7, 2017. The 
document listed incorrect dates by which interested parties may file 
comments and reply comments.

DATES: This correction is applicable September 15, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Anna Gentry, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c382adada2ed84a6adb7b1ba83a5a0a0eda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4809262629660f2d263c3a31082e2b2b662f273e">[email protected]</span></a>, of 
the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, (202) 418-
7769.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2017-18987 appearing on page 
42263 of the Federal Register of September 7, 2017, the following 
corrections are made:

Dates [Corrected]

    On page 42263, the Dates heading is corrected to read ``Interested 
parties may file comments on or before September 27, 2017, and reply 
comments on or before October 10, 2017.''

Federal Communications Commission.
Ne[scedil]e Guendelsberger,
Senior Deputy Bureau Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2017-19481 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9035-2]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa/ nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed 09/04/2017 Through 09/08/2017
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20170175, Final, NPS, CA, Vista Grande Drainage Basin 
Improvement Project, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, San 
Francisco and San Mateo Counties, Review Period Ends: 10/15/2017, 
Contact: Steven Ortega 415-561-4955.
EIS No. 20170176, Draft, DOT, LA, Final Integrated Feasibility Report 
and Environmental Impact Statement for the Houma Navigational Canal 
Deepening Project, Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana, Comment Period Ends: 
10/30/2017, Contact: Patricia S. Naquin 504-862-1544.
EIS No. 20170177, Draft, AFS, SD, Black Hills Resilient Landscapes 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 10/30/2017, Contact: Anne Davy 406-273-
1836.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20170154, Draft, USACE, IL, The Great Lakes and Mississippi 
River Interbasin Study--Brandon Road, Comment Period Ends: 10/02/2017, 
Contact: Andrew Leichty 309-794-5399; Revision to the FR Notice 
Published 08/18/2017; Extending Comment Period from 10/02/2017 to 11/
16/2017.

    Dated: September 12, 2017.
Kelly Knight,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2017-19665 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from April
     30, 1998 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
     to such.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>            0001014491             
<NAME>           General American Royalty, Inc.             
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         6,009
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               24,175
<PP&E>                                         337,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                 88,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          94,173
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,032
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   318,575
<SALES>                                        53,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               152,000
<CGS>                                          5,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (18,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18,838)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 1 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          48,723                       0
<SECURITIES>                                   142,005                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,628                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,225                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,775                       0
<PP&E>                                          10,065                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,649                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,365                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,738                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            23                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     200,090                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,365                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,576                   8,859
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,285                  17,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 464                     275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,181)                 (8,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                      (2,294)                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,475)                 (8,126)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.35)                  (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)                  (0.53)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF THIS QUARATERLY REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             828
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                       495
<INVENTORY>                                      4,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,644
<PP&E>                                          10,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,757
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,606
<SALES>                                          4,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,834
<CGS>                                            2,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,735
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,334)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,334)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.21)
        

</TABLE>
#### Clarence L. VANCE, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 10-381.

Nov. 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District, denied.
Exhibit 23.1
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-223924 on Form N-2 of our reports dated March 4, 2020, relating to the financial statements and related notes of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. and the effectiveness of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.'s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, and our report dated March 4, 2020, attached as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, on the financial information set forth in Part II, Item 7 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Senior Securities”.  We also consent to the references to us under the headings “Controls and Procedures” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Senior Securities” in the Form 10-K.
 
 /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
 San Francisco, California
 March 4, 2020
#### The City of Chester.

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

December 27, 1881.)

Collision— Unavoidable Accident.

Where a steam-boat and a tug and tow were approaching each other on nearly opposite courses, and they came together with their starboard bows, caused, by the change in the direction of the tug, which could not be kept steady with her tow in the ebb tide, the libel against the steam-boat was dismissed.

*Owen & Gray,*for libellant.

*Shipman, Barlow, Larocque & Choate,*for claimant.

Benedict, D. J.

The controlling facts of this case, as they appear to be disclosed by the testimony, are these: The two vessels were approaching each other on nearly opposite courses, the City of Chester being upon the port of the Beard. This is proved by witnesses from both vessels. • Several of the libellant’s witnesses say that the Chester was on their port, and testimony to the same effect is produced by the claimant. The vessels came together with the starboard bow of the Chester to the starboard bow of the Beard, and the blow was glancing. The cause of the collision was, therefore, necessarily a ehangé on the part of the Chester towards Brooklyn, or a change on the part of the Beard towards New York. The libel states that the Chester made no change until the vessels were within a short distance, but asserts that when within a short distance she attempted to go between the Beard and Brooklyn. This latter assertion is not borne out by the testimony. The weight of the evidence is that the City of Chester did not change towards Brooklyn, but that the Beard did change towards New York. There is testimony from the libellant’s witnesses that the Beard, with a canal-boat on her port side, could not be kept steady in the ebb tide, and the accident was doubtless caused by a swing of the Beard towards New York when the vessels were too near each other to give the pilot time to counteract it.

For a collision so caused the Chester is not in fault, and the libel must be dismissed, with costs.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, William S. Creekmuir, as Chief Financial Officer of Simmons Bedding Company
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

        (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
    ended June 26, 2004 (the "Report"), being filed with the U.S. Securities and
    Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.

Date: August 10, 2004                           /s/ William S. Creekmuir
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Name: William S. Creekmuir
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simmons Bedding Company and will be retained by Simmons Bedding
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                       4
#### Burl Eugene LYLES, Petitioner, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Civ. A. No. 14585.

United States District Court S. D. Texas, Houston Division.

Feb. 19, 1963.

Charles W. Gill, Houston, Tex., for petitioner.

' J. G. Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Texas, Huntsville, Tex., for respondent.

INGRAHAM, District Judge.

The petitioner, Burl Eugene Lyles, has filed a motion for subpoena of six witnesses, five of whom are alleged to reside at Odessa, Texas, and one at Tyler, Texas.

 The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is a civil action and is governed by the civil rules. Rule 45(e) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides the following relative to the subpoena of witnesses for a hearing or trial:

> “ * * * A subpoena requiring the attendance of a witness at a hearing or trial may be served at any place within the district, or at any place without the district that is within 100 miles of the place of the hearing or trial specified in the subpoena; * *

Odessa and Tyler, Texas, are not within the Southern District of Texas and are not within 100 miles of the place of the hearing or trial, Houston, Texas.

The motion is accordingly denied.

The clerk will forward true copies hereof to counsel and the petitioner.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: April 28, 2016 520065 

________________________________

KEITH McDAY,

Appellant, 

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STATE OF NEW YORK, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: March 25, 2016

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Keith McDay, Comstock, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Jeffrey W.

Lang of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Lynch, J.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Hard, J.),

entered September 24, 2014, which denied claimant's motion for

summary judgment.

Claimant, a prison inmate, brought this claim contending,

among other things, that defendant failed to return a television

that was taken from his cell by the Department of Corrections and

Community Supervision when he was transferred into the special

housing unit. Following joinder of issue, claimant moved for

summary judgment. The Court of Claims denied the motion and this

appeal by claimant ensued. 

We affirm. The drastic remedy of summary judgment should

only be granted where there is no doubt as to the existence of a

triable issue of fact (see Encarnacion v State of New York, 49
-2- 520065

AD3d 1038, 1039 [2008]). Upon viewing the proof in a light most

favorable to the nonmoving party, "[t]he court's function on a

motion for summary judgment is issue finding not issue

determination and, where a genuine issue of fact exists, summary

judgment must be denied" (Gadani v Dormitory Auth. of State of

N.Y., 43 AD3d 1218, 1219 [2007]). Here, there is ambiguity as to

claimant's rightful possession of the television, which precludes

summary judgment. Specifically, although claimant had a permit

authorizing him to possess a television, defendant asserts that

the serial number on the television at issue does not match the

serial number on claimant's permit. Defendant also asserts that

correction facility rules prohibit claimant from having a

television in the special housing unit. As questions of fact

exist as to whether defendant was negligent in not returning the

television to claimant, the Court of Claims properly denied

claimant's motion for summary judgment (see Encarnacion v State

of New York, 49 AD3d at 1039).

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
#### Charlie H. ROWE, Claimant-Appellant, v. Gordon H. MANSFIELD, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2008-7006.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 20, 2007.

Charlie H. Rowe, pro se.

*ORDER*

Charlie H. Rowe has not responded to the court’s October 25, 2007 order directing him to respond within 21 days why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely-

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.