alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31**

  

I,Leah Nivison, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of the GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-GC13 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for theperiod covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and exceptas disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreementsin all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this reportin accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association,as Trustee, Certificate Administrator and Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic CommercialReal Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, and National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.

 

Dated:March 28, 2016

 

/s/Leah Nivison

 

ChiefExecutive Officer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): September 
12, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 6, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 350 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017-186, CP2017-287.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-19271 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity
as interim principal financial officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SRI on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SRI.



|                   |  |     |  |                                           
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark R. Faris                         
|                   |  |     |  | Mark R. Faris                             
|                   |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

THADENE MATTIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2603

[April 12, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502010CF009625A.

Thadene Mattis, Chipley, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Ashford Hospitality Prime, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard J. Stockton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 16, 2017





/s/RICHARD J. STOCKTONRichard J. StocktonChief Executive Officer
Order entered May 2, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 01368

- CV

FREDIS BENITEZ, ET AL., Appellant s

V.

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13

- 03671



### O RDER

We GRANT appellee’s March 18, 2014 motion to file a sur

- reply brief. We ORDER

the sur

- reply brief tendered to this Court by appell ee on March 18, 2014 filed as of that date.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 291 

Honoring the lives of the 33 crew members 

aboard the El Faro. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2015 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. NELSON, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. KING, 

Mr. KAINE, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. CARPER, Mr. COONS, Mr. WARNER, 

Mr. PERDUE, Ms. WARREN, and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the lives of the 33 crew members 

aboard the El Faro. 

Whereas the El Faro departed Jacksonville, Florida for Puerto Rico on September 29, 2015, with 33 crew members 

aboard; 

Whereas the crew of the El Faro on September 29, 2015, 

consisted of 28 citizens of the United States and 5 Polish 

nationals; 

Whereas the El Faro sent distress alerts on October 1, 2015; 

Whereas members of the Coast Guard, Navy, and Air Force 

valiantly searched for the crew members of the El Faro; 

and 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 291 ATS 

Whereas the people of the United States mourn the loss of 

the 33 seamen aboard the El Faro: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes and honors the lives of the 33 

3 crew members aboard the El Faro who were lost 

4 after the El Faro departed on September 29, 2015; 

5 (2) recognizes the valiant search efforts of the 

6 members of the Coast Guard, Navy, and Air Force 

7 who searched for the crew members of the El Faro; 

8 and 

9 (3) offers heartfelt condolences to the family, 

10 friends, and loved ones of the crew members of the 

11 El Faro. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

I, Leah Nivison, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the GS Mortgage Securities Trust2013-GC13 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNRPartners, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator and Custodian, TriMontReal Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant,and National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.

 

 

Dated: March 29, 2017

 

 

/s/ Leah Nivison

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

(senior officer in charge of securitizationof the depositor)
null

2016-09-07

226.87105

eng - Argued: 2016-09-07. Docket number: Case: 15-1720
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DAISYTEK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,161
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  125,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,385
<INVENTORY>                                    107,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,998
<PP&E>                                          33,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 274,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,437
<BONDS>                                         42,089
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           171
<OTHER-SE>                                     148,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   274,142
<SALES>                                        442,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               442,740
<CGS>                                          389,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  389,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,073
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,981
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,352
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,629
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,629
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        

</TABLE>
#### Elijah Jerome WHITE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Warden M. RIVERA, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 07-7544.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 28, 2008.

Elijah Jerome White, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elijah Jerome White, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *White v. Rivera,*518 F.Supp.2d 752 (D.S.C.2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 10.1

 

THIRD AMENDMENT

TO ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PURCHASING AGREEMENT

 

This THIRD AMENDMENT TO ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PURCHASING AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is dated as of December 30, 2011, and agreed to by and between XPLORE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Delaware corporation (“Seller”), and DSCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, d/b/a FAR WEST CAPITAL, a Texas limited liability company (“Purchaser”).  All capitalized terms used and not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the ARPA (as defined below) and/or the UCC, as applicable.

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser have entered into that certain Accounts Receivable Purchasing Agreement, dated December 10, 2009 (as from time to time amended, the “ARPA”), wherein Purchaser does, from time to time (and at its sole discretion), purchase from Seller certain of Seller’s accounts receivable; and

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to make certain adjustments to their relative rights and obligations under the ARPA, as more particularly set forth below.

 

AGREEMENT

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the ARPA is modified and amended as follows:

 

1.             Definition 1.21 of the ARPA (“Maximum Amount”) is hereby modified and shall now read as follows:

 

1.21 “Maximum Amount”: $8,500,000.00

 

2.             It is understood that this Amendment constitutes an amendment and modification of the ARPA. The terms of this Amendment are incorporated into and made a part of the ARPA.  Except as expressly set forth herein, nothing in this Amendment modifies or amends the ARPA or any other document executed by Seller in connection therewith (collectively, the “Funding Documents”).  However, in the event of an irreconcilable conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of any Funding Document and the provisions of this Amendment, the provisions of this Amendment shall control.

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 

1











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed as of the date first written above.

 

 

	
PURCHASER:
    	
SELLER:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
DSCH   CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
    	
Xplore   Technologies Corporation of America
    
	
DBA   FAR WEST CAPITAL
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/Brian   Center
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/Michael   J. Rapisand
    
	
Name:   
    	
Brian   Center
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Michael   J. Rapisand
    
	
Title:   
    	
Chief   Operating Officer
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief   Financial Officer
    
	
Address:
    	
4601   Spicewood Springs Rd
    	
 
    	
Address:
    	
14000   Summit Drive, Suite 900
    
	
 
    	
Building   2, Suite 200
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Austin, TX 78728
    
	
 
    	
Austin,   TX 78759
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    


 

2
Promissory Note of the registrant



 Exhibit 10.2 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	$1,230,789.00	 	December 16, 2011

 For value received, Red Bullet Racing Corporation, a Delaware corporation having an address at 901 South
Federal Highway, Hallandale Beach, Florida 33009 (“Borrower”), promises to pay to the order of The Alpen House Racing ULC, an Alberta unlimited liability company, (“Lender”), at its office in Aurora, Ontario, Canada (or at such
other location as Lender may direct), in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds, on the Maturity Date (as hereafter defined), the principal sum of One Million Two Hundred Thirty Thousand Seven Hundred and
Eighty-Nine Dollars and No Cents ($1,230,789.00), together with interest on the unpaid principal balance hereof at the rate of 0.19% per annum, compounded annually on each anniversary of the date hereof, from and including the date hereof to
but excluding the date of payment. As used herein, “Maturity Date” shall mean the earlier of (i) December 16, 2014 and (ii) the date of consummation of an offering of equity securities of Borrower pursuant to which net
proceeds from the sale of such equity securities to persons other than affiliates of Lender or Borrower equal or exceed the amount then due under this Note. This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty or premium. An
“Event of Default” shall occur hereunder if the principal of and all accrued and unpaid interest on this Note shall not have been paid in full by 5:00 Eastern Standard Time on the Maturity Date. 

Borrower shall pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and legal expenses, if this Note is not paid when
due, whether or not legal proceedings are commenced. 
 Presentment for payment, demand, notice of dishonor and protest and any
and all other notices and defenses, including but not limited to set-off and counterclaim, are expressly waived. 
 This Note
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida without giving effect to conflicts of law provisions thereof. 
  


			
	RED BULLET RACING CORPORATION
	a Delaware corporation, as Borrower
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lyle Strachan

	Name:	 	Lyle Strachan
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

Z.F., a child

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2600

[ June 28, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Michael C. Heisey , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562017CJ000400A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, M AY and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERRI JOETTE TILLETT,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 35399

D.C. No. 1:16

- cv

- 00148

- SPW

- TJC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017 **

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jerri Joette Tillett appeals pro se from the district court’ s order denying her

motion for a preliminary injunction in her action challenging the Bureau of Land

Management, Interior Board of Land Appeals, and the United States Department of

the Interior’s (collectively, “BLM” ) management of the Pryor Mountain Wild

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 17 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 35399

Horse Range (“PMWHR”)

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a). We

review for an abuse of discretion. Jackson v. City & County of San Francisco , 746

F.3d 953, 958 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Tillett’s request for

preliminary injunctive relief

. See id. (setting forth standard for issuance of

preliminary injunction)

. Tillett failed to demonstrate that she would likely suffer

irreparabl e harm from the use of control burns on the PMWHR in light of BLM’s

agreement to delay implementing such control burn measures until at least

September 2017

. See Am. Trucking Ass’ns , Inc. v. City of Los Angeles , 559 F.3d

1046, 1052 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[A] n injunction cannot issue merely because it is

possible that there will be an irreparable injury to the plaintiff; it must be likely that

there will be. ”). Tillett also failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the

merits of her challenge to the use of pesticides and herbicides on the PMWHR in

light of the district court’s prior denial of her nearly identical claims. See

Headwaters Inc. v. U.S. Forest Serv. , 399 F.3d 1047, 105 2 (9th Cir. 2005) (setting

forth test for application of the doctrine of re s judicata).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider documents and facts not presented to the district court.

See United States v. Elias , 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts3 17

- 35399

not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

We reject as unsupported by the record Tillett’s contentions regarding

alleged judicial misconduct.

AFFIRMED.