alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 13.2**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode), the undersigned officer of Navigator Holdings Ltd., a Marshall Islands company (the “Company”), hereby certifies that: 

The Annual Reporton Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated May 22, 2020 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 22, 2020 

 
By: /s/ Niall NolanName: Niall NolanTitle: 
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal FinancialOfficer)
**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0                  22,756
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                   3,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                   (114)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  27,622
<PP&E>                                               0                   2,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                 (1,094)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                  29,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                   2,548
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  21,678
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                   5,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  29,562
<SALES>                                          5,202                  10,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,202                  10,230
<CGS>                                              429                     769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      429                     769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,578                   7,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,480                   2,839
<INCOME-TAX>                                       480                     947
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,000                   1,892
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,000                   1,892
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13                     .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ JOHN V. GENOVAJohn V. GenovaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10QSB
FOR PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         438,315
<SECURITIES>                                 5,441,261
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,898,370
<PP&E>                                         243,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,086,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          321,472
<BONDS>                                      2,600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,142
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,111,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,086,757
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,475
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  720,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,170,428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,170,428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,170,428)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vincent BEST, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-7301.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 25, 2008.

*528Vincent Best, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vincent B. Best appeals the district court’s order denying his emergency motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Best,*No. 3:93-cr-00216-GCM-3 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2007). We deny Best’s petition for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CALIPER LIFE SCIENCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E. Kevin Hrusovsky, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

(2)                          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                     | /s/   E. KEVIN HRUSOVSKY                |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                     |                                    |
|                     | E.   Kevin Hrusovsky                    |
|                     | President   and Chief Executive Officer |
|                     | (Principal   Executive Officer)         |
|                     |                                    |
|                     |                                    |
| Date:   May 6, 2011 |                                    |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.1


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CN Bancorp, Inc. (Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (Report),
the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of
                  operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.





           Date : May 6, 2003                /s/ Jan W. Clark
                                            -------------------------
                                            Jan W. Clark
                                            Chairman of the Board of Directors,
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer



           Date : May 6, 2003                /s/ Michael T. Storm
                                            -------------------------
                                            Michael T. Storm
                                            Chief Financial Officer


This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CN Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by CN Bancorp, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





                                       20
<PAGE>
exhibit46.htm


Exhibit 4.6

















INSTRUMENT OF ASSUMPTION


Air Quality Revenue Refunding Bonds


(Columbus Southern Power Company Project), Series 2009B







THIS INSTRUMENT OF ASSUMPTION, dated December 31, 2011, is entered into by OHIO POWER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation (the “Company”).







RECITALS







1.           Columbus Southern Company, an Ohio corporation (“CSP”), has heretofore entered into the Loan Agreement dated as of August 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”), by and between the Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, a political subdivision, body politic and corporate duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the Constitution and laws of the State of Ohio (the “Issuer”) and CSP, pursuant to which CSP is obligated to make certain payments related to the Air Quality Revenue Refunding Bonds (Columbus Southern Power Company Project), Series 2009B issued by the Issuer under the Indenture of Trust dated as of August 1, 2009 (as heretofore and hereafter amended or supplemented, the “Indenture”), with The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (the “Trustee”).







2.           On the date hereof, CSP merged into the Company.







3.            Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated December 31, 2011 among the Company and CSP, and Ohio Revised Code §1701.82, the Company became responsible and liable for all the liabilities and obligations of CSP when the merger became effective and thereby unconditionally assumed the due and prompt performance of all of the obligations of CSP under the Agreement in accordance with Section 5.8.


 


4.           This Instrument of Assumption is being executed pursuant to Sections 5.8 of the Agreement.







NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT KNOWN that, in consideration of the premises and of other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company DOES HEREBY ASSUME all of the obligations of CSP under the Agreement and unconditionally assumes the due and prompt performance of all of the obligations of CSP under the Agreement in accordance with Section 5.8.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Instrument to be executed as of the day and year first above written.


 







OHIO POWER COMPANY







/s/ Renee V. Hawkins


By: Renee V. Hawkins


Title: Assistant Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2360 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2360

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to extend the 
     Constitution, laws, and jurisdiction of the United States to 
     installations and devices attached to the seabed of the Outer 
   Continental Shelf for the production and support of production of 
  energy from sources other than oil and gas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing for Our Workforce and 
Energy Resources Act'' or the ``POWER Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CONSTITUTION, LAWS, AND JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED 
              STATES TO ENERGY FACILITIES AND DEVICES ON THE OUTER 
              CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 4(a)(1) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1333(a)(1)) is amended by--
            (1) inserting ``or producing or supporting production of 
        energy from sources other than oil and gas'' after 
        ``therefrom'';
            (2) inserting ``or transmitting such energy'' after 
        ``transporting such resources''; and
            (3) inserting ``and other energy'' after ``That mineral''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2360

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to extend the 
     Constitution, laws, and jurisdiction of the United States to 
     installations and devices attached to the seabed of the Outer 
   Continental Shelf for the production and support of production of 
  energy from sources other than oil and gas, and for other purposes.
```
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 19 

To express the disfavor of Congress regarding the proposed agreement for 

cooperation between the United States and the People’s Republic of 

China transmitted to the Congress by the President on April 21, 2015, 

pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. COTTON) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

To express the disfavor of Congress regarding the proposed 

agreement for cooperation between the United States 

and the People’s Republic of China transmitted to the 

Congress by the President on April 21, 2015, pursuant 

to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress does not favor the proposed agreement 

4 for cooperation transmitted to the Congress by the Presi5 dent on April 21, 2015. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Amendment No. 1 to the Change in Control Agreement for Charles F. McCoy



 Exhibit 10.4 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE 

CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT FOR CHARLES F. MCCOY 

This Amendment No. 1, effective the 31st day of December, 2011, to the Change in Control Agreement for CHARLES F. MCCOY, dated August 14, 2009 (the
“Agreement”) between Unifi, Inc. (the “Company”) and CHARLES F. MCCOY (the “Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the Agreement provides certain severance benefits in the event the Executive’s employment is terminated without
“Cause” or the Executive resigns for “Good Reason” following a “Change in Control” of the Company (as such terms are defined in the Agreement); 
 WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 14(a) of the Agreement, the Company may amend the Agreement at any time; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional three years and to make certain other clarifications. 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows, effective December 31, 2011: 

1. Section 1(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by striking the phrase “December 31, 2011” and replacing it with
“December 31, 2014”. 
 2. Section 3(e) of the Agreement is amended by replacing the first sentence as follows: 

“Following a Change in Control and during the term of this Agreement, the Executive may terminate the Executive’s employment for
Good Reason.” 
 3. Section 4(b) of the Agreement is amended by replacing the last sentence as follows: 

“The determination of any reduction in the severance payments under this Section 4 pursuant to the foregoing proviso shall be
made by the Company’s Independent Certified Public Accountants, and their decision shall be conclusive and binding on the Company and the Executive.” 
 4. In all other respects not amended, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed. 
 * * * Signature Page to Follow * * * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to
be executed on this the 3rd day of January, 2012.

  

			
	UNIFI, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ WILLIAM L. JASPER

		 	WILLIAM L. JASPER
		 	Chairman & C.E.O.
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ CHARLES F. MCCOY

	CHARLES F. MCCOY
#### Bilal MAHMUD, Plaintiff-Appellant, Khadijah Mahmud, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et. al., Defendants, Justin P. Oberman, individually and in his official capacity as Director, Credentialing Program Office, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-13311

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 16, 2008.

Stephen Michael Katz, Law Offices of Stephen M. Katz, Marietta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Andrew D. Silverman, Mary H. Mason, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before CARNES, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-appellant Bilal Mahmud appeals the dismissal of his action. The judgment of the district court was accompanied by a full published opinion, *Mahmud v. Ober*
      *936
      *man,*508 F.Supp.2d 1294 (2007). In his complaint, Mahmud asserted claims which he sought to establish under the *Bivens v. Six Unknomi Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics*doctrine, 403 U.S. 388, 397, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), based upon the suspension or revocation of the Hazardous Materials Endorsement on his commercial drivers license. Based on the facts of this case, the district court held that a *Bivens*remedy for damages was not available to Mahmud, and, furthermore, Mahmud had not met his burden of establishing that due process is satisfied by the exercise of personal jurisdiction over defendant-appellee Justin P. Oberman. It granted Oberman’s motion to dismiss for both reasons.

Having carefully considered the judgment and opinion of the district court, the briefs of the parties, and the record, and finding no reversible error, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2419 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the meaning of ‘‘combat 

with the enemy’’ for purposes of service-connection of disabilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 6, 2011 

Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the meaning of ‘‘combat with the enemy’’ for purposes of serviceconnection of disabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Compensation Owed 

5 for Mental Health Based on Activities in Theater Post6 traumatic Stress Disorder Act’’ or the ‘‘COMBAT PTSD 

7 Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2419 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF MEANING OF ‘‘COMBAT WITH 

2 THE ENEMY’’ FOR PURPOSES OF SERVICE3 CONNECTION OF DISABILITIES. 

4 (a) CLARIFICATION.—Section 1154(b) of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘In the case’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

7 In the case’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the term 

11 ‘combat with the enemy’ includes service on active duty— 

12 ‘‘(A) in a theater of combat operations (as de13 termined by the Secretary in consultation with the 

14 Secretary of Defense) during a period of war; or 

15 ‘‘(B) in combat against a hostile force during a 

16 period of hostilities.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (2) of subsection 

18 (b) of section 1154 of title 38, United States Code, as 

19 added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to a claim 

20 for disability compensation under chapter 11 of such title 

21 pending on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS