alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |
| Citibank, N.A.                        | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware |
| As AART Indenture Trustee             | As AART Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Kristen Driscoll     | 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200 |
| 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor | Wilmington, DE 19805-1266 |
| New York, NY 10013                    |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | AART 2013-SN1 - Administration Agreement |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Administrator during the period of January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and of its performance under the Administration Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Administrator has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Administration Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2320 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend existing 

elective tax treatment for Alaska Native Settlement Trusts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2011 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend existing elective tax treatment for Alaska Native 

Settlement Trusts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF ELECTIVE TAX 

4 TREATMENT FOR ALASKA NATIVE SETTLE5 MENT TRUSTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 901 of the Economic 

7 Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (relat8 ing to sunset provisions) shall not apply to the provisions 

9 of, and amendments made by, section 671 of such Act (reVerDate Mar 15 2010 17:33 Jun 28, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2320.IH H2320

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2320 IH

1 lating to tax treatment and information requirements of 

2 Alaska Native Settlement Trusts). 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall be effective upon the date of enactment 

5 of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(logo) LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1. A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “Reporting Period"), and of the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liability company

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 23, 2016

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue · Suite 700 · Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 · Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

Schedule I

 

 

GSMS 2013-GC13

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2013-GC13

 

 

Fitch Ratings Inc. 

33 Whitehall Street

Attention: Commercial Mortgaged Surveillance 

New York NY 10004

General Contact

 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II 

200 West Street

New York NY 10282 

Leah Nivison

 

Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc., 

845 Third Avnue, 4th Floor 

Attention: CMBS Surveillance 

New York NY 10022

General Contact

 

Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 

7 World Trade Center

250 Greenwich Street

Attn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillace Group 

New York NY 10007

General Contact

  

TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., 

3424 Peachtree Street

NE, Suite 2200

Atlanta GA 30308

J. Gregory Winchester

 

TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., 

McKenna Long& Albridge LLP

303 Peachtree Street

Suite 5300

Atlanta GA 30308  Patrick M McGeeham

 

U.S. Bank National Association 

Global CorporateTrust Services 

190 S. LaSalle Street, 7th Floor

Mail Station: MK-IL-SL7C

Chicago IL 60603 

Erika A. Forshtay
EXHIBIT 4.1
                                                                     -----------

                      FORM OF CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES
                      ------------------------------------

Houston, Texas

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ATSI, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (Maker), promises to pay to
RECAP MARKETING & CONSULTING LLP (Holder) the principal sum of [amount] with
--------------------------------
interest from date at the rate of twelve percent (12%), per year, until applied
to warrants converted under a separate agreement. Holder or Maker has the right
to convert the Principal at the price per share (rate) identified in Exhibit 4.1
of the Consulting Agreement ("Conversion"). Such Conversion shall occur only
after approval of a reverse split, and authorization by the SEC of the Maker,
and approval by the Board of Directors, which shall not be unreasonably
withheld.

Principal is payable in lawful money, or stock if converted, of the United
States of America at 12000 Westheimer, Suite 340, Houston, Texas 77077, or at
such place as may later be designated by written notice from the Holder to the
Maker hereof, on the date and in the manner following:

All  principal  and accrued interest is due on or before twelve (12) months from
the  date  the  principal  amount  is  received.

This  Note is not secured, other than by conversion of warrants to common stock.

Both parties understand that the amount or value above does not exceed the
maximum interest allowed by law, under the statutes of the state of Texas, and
acknowledge that the terms are reasonable given the nature of the loan.

                                ATSI, Inc.
                                a Nevada Corporation
                                By:  /s/  Arthur  L.  Smith
                                     ----------------------
                                Arthur  L.  Smith
                                Its President and Chief Executive Officer


Amount:  $10,000     Received  on:  FEBRUARY  2,  2005
         -------                    ------------------
Amount:  $ 4,000     Received  on:  FEBRUARY  3,  2005
         --------                   -------------------
Amount:  $10,000     Received  on:  FEBRUARY  17,  2005
         -------                    -------------------
Amount:  $10,000     Received  on:  MARCH  22,  2005
         -------                    ----------------
Amount:  $10,000     Received  on:  APRIL  6,  2005
         -------                    ---------------
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002**





I
      hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying Form 10-QSB of CN
      Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005,
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of; and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company








/s/
      Michael T. Storm





Michael
      T. Storm


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      9,
      2005








23
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM WORLD
CALLNET,  INC.  REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE  MONTHS  ENDED  DECEMBER 31,
1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001014491
<NAME>                        World CallNet, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                                 691
<SECURITIES>                                           565
<RECEIVABLES>                                          697
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1389
<PP&E>                                                 298
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        7131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 3332
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                13
<OTHER-SE>                                            3786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          7131
<SALES>                                                379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       379
<CGS>                                                  379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      1509
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1548)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1548)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1548)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Robert M. Restaino, as Judge of the Niagara Falls City Court, Niagara County, Petitioner. State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Respondent.

Submitted February 11, 2008;

decided February 14, 2008

*751Judge Pigott taking no part.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43541-43542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19835]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS


Updated OGE Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Office of Government Ethics (OGE).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the 
updated OGE Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board.

DATES: September 18, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shelley K. Finlayson, Chief of Staff 
and Program Counsel, Office of Government Ethics, Suite 500, 1201 New 
York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20005-3917; Telephone: 202-482-9300; 
TYY: 800-877-8339; FAX: 202-482-9237.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 U.S.C. 4314(c) requires each agency to 
establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of 
Personnel Management at 5 CFR part 430, subpart C and Sec.  430.310 
thereof in particular, one or more Senior Executive Service performance 
review boards. As a small executive branch agency, OGE has just one 
board. In order to ensure an adequate level of staffing and to avoid a 
constant series of recusals, the designated members of OGE's SES 
Performance Review Board are being

[[Page 43542]]

drawn, as in the past, in large measure from the ranks of other 
executive branch agencies. The board shall review and evaluate the 
initial appraisal of each OGE senior executive's performance by his or 
her supervisor, along with any recommendations in each instance to the 
appointing authority relative to the performance of the senior 
executive. This notice updates the membership of OGE's SES Performance 
Review Board as it was most recently published at 78 FR 76148 (December 
16, 2013).

    Approved: September 13, 2017.
David J. Apol,
Acting Director, U.S. Office of Government Ethics.

    The following officials have been appointed members of the SES 
Performance Review Board of the Office of Government Ethics: Shelley K. 
Finlayson, [Chair], Chief of Staff and Program Counsel, Office of 
Government Ethics; Stuart Bender, Director, Office of Ethics, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture; Judith S. Kaleta, Deputy General Counsel, 
U.S. Department of Transportation; and Shira Pavis Minton, Ethics 
Counsel, Office of the Ethics Counsel, Securities and Exchange 
Commission.

[FR Doc. 2017-19835 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6345-03-P
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 Three Months Ended      Six Months Ended
                                      June 30,               June 30,
                                 2003        2002        2003        2002
                                 ----        ----        ----        ----
                                   (in thousands, except per share data)
<S>                             <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
BASIC

Net Income                      $  527      $  419      $1,001      $  844
/ Weighted Average Shares        2,655       2,619       2,645       2,617
                                ------      ------      ------      ------

Basic Earnings Per Share        $ 0.20      $ 0.16      $ 0.38      $ 0.32
                                ======      ======      ======      ======


DILUTED

Net Income                      $  527      $  419      $1,001      $  844
/ Weighted Average Shares        2,698       2,648       2,688       2,641
                                ------      ------      ------      ------
Diluted Earnings Per Share      $ 0.20      $ 0.16      $ 0.37      $ 0.32
                                ======      ======      ======      ======
</TABLE>
Limited Liquidity Program



 Exhibit 10.36 
 Limited Liquidity Program for Shares of ARAMARK Holdings Corporation 
  

			
	Purpose	  	 To permit
eligible employees to obtain limited liquidity with respect to their shares of stock of ARAMARK Holdings for cash needs. The program is not intended to be utilized for diversification. The existing Hardship Policy would be maintained.

 

	Timing	  	 Twice each year, following the issuance of
the new valuation.
  

	Eligible Shares	  	 Investment shares owned by stockholders for
at least one year and shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of Installment Stock Purchase Opportunities (“ISPO Shares”); provided such shares have been owned for at least one year. Shares obtained as a result of the exercise of options
other than ISPOs are not eligible for sale in the program.
  

	Eligible Employees	  	 All employees and their permitted transferees
with investment shares or ISPO Shares, except members of the Management Committee and their permitted transferees. Permitted transferees can only participate with the express written consent of the underlying employee and all limits apply in the
aggregate to the holdings of each employee and his or her permitted transferees.
  

	
Minimum Sale Amount (any transaction)

 
	  	$10,000
	
Maximum Sale Amount (annually)

 
	  	Lower of 10% of investment shares and ISPO Shares or $100,000
	
Retention Requirement

 
	  	Employees would be required to hold at least two- thirds of their original investment
shares and ISPO Shares
	Number of Sale Opportunities	  	 Employees can participate twice in any one
year, subject to the annual Maximum Sale Amount (e.g. as long as the total sales do not exceed the lower of 10% of the investment shares and ISPO Shares or $100,000). Employees can only participate two out of every three years.

 


 Amended June 21, 2011
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43126

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

GAYLE KEITH WESLING aka SESLING aka WES SESLING ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 350

Filed: January 27, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey , District Judge.

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Gayle Keith Wesling pled guilty to one count of grand theft , Idaho Code §§ 18

- 2403(1),

18

- 2407(1)(b), 18

- 2409, and one count of criminal possession of a financial transaction card, I.C.
§§ 18

- 3125, 18

- 3128 . The district court imposed unified sentences of fourteen years, with a
minimum period of confinement of two years, for grand theft and five years, with a minimum
period of confinement of two yea rs, for criminal possession of a financial transaction card . The
district court ordered these sentences to run concurrently with each other but consecutive to a2

sentence in a separate case. Wesling filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of
sentence, which the district court denied. Wesling appeals.
A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d

23, 2 4 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In
presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of
new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the
record, including any new information submitted with Wesling ’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude
no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Wesling ’s

Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
Estela R. Garcia, Individually, on behalf of all Wrongful Death Beneficiaries, and on
behalf of The Estate of Juan Garcia, 

# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

January 13, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00893

- CV

UVALDE COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY

, Appellant

v.

Estela R. GARCIA , Individually, on behalf of all Wrongful Death Beneficiaries, and on behalf of The Estate of Juan Garcia, Deceased, Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2013

- 09

- 295 40

- CV Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file its brief is granted. We order appellant’s brief due January 17, 2014

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I h ave hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 13th day of January, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
Hardship Stock Repurchase Policy



 Exhibit 10.35 
 Hardship Stock Repurchase Policy 
 Employees of ARAMARK who own common stock of
ARAMARK Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) may request that the Company authorize the repurchase of all or some of the shares owned by them in the event of an unforeseeable emergency, which would include a severe financial hardship
resulting from an illness or accident, loss of property due to casualty or similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances or other circumstances approved by the Executive Vice President, Human Resources. In order for a hardship repurchase to
be considered, the employee must represent that his or her need cannot be satisfied with other resources reasonably available, including reimbursement or compensation by insurance or otherwise or reasonable liquidation of other assets (but only to
the extent the liquidation of such assets would not in itself cause an immediate and heavy financial need). 
 Employees who wish to apply for a
hardship repurchase must complete the appropriate form and submit it, along with supporting documentation, to the Executive Vice President, Human Resources.