alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|    |                                                                                                                                      |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NewPage Holdings Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                       |
|-----------------------|
|                       |  |  |  |
| Date:  March 20, 2014 |   | By:   /s/ Jay A. Epstein |   |
|                  |   | Jay A. Epstein |   |
|                  |   | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial |   |
|                  |   |   Officer and Assistant Secretary |   |
|                  |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

                    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act that the meeting of the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, previously scheduled to be held at the Department of Veterans Affairs, 1800 G. Street NW., Conference Room 870, Washington, DC 20006, on September 12-13, 2017,                     *has been cancelled*.                

                    For more information, please contact Stacy Boyd, Designated Federal Officer, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Benefits Administration, Compensation Service, Policy Staff at (202) 461-9580 or via email at                     *Stacy.Boyd@va.gov*.                

Dated: September 5, 2017.

Jelessa M. Burney,

Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-19040 Filed 9-7-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 31 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.31
                                     Agreed to February 12, 2016        

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
February 11, 2016, through Saturday, February 20, 2016, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on 
Monday, February 22, 2016, or such other time on that day as may be 
specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the House adjourns on any legislative day from Friday, 
February 12, 2016, through Tuesday, February 16, 2016, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, 
February 23, 2016, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. (a)  The Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee, 
after concurrence with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 
the Members of the Senate to reassemble at such place and time as he 
may designate if, in his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
     (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the Senate 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the Senate shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
    Sec. 3. (a)  The Speaker or his designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the House 
to reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if, in his 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
     (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,374
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     36,452
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          33,073
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            33,186
<LOANS>                                        232,887
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 337,213
<DEPOSITS>                                     294,049
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,876
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,792
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,475
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,932
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 337,213
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,139
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  988
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    76
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,203
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,749
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,859
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,344
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,111
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         727
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       727
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.35
<LOANS-NON>                                        211
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,307
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,344
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,518
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       49
<RECOVERIES>                                        22
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,551
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,551
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 267 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 267

  Expressing support for the continuation of the Federal Perkins Loan 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2015

  Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Mr. Portman, Mr. Casey, Ms. Collins, Mr. 
Kaine, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Reed, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Brown, Mrs. Feinstein, 
    Mr. Franken, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Coons, Ms. Mikulski, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. 
   Heinrich, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Peters, Mrs. Murray, and Mr. Warner) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
               on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the continuation of the Federal Perkins Loan 
                                program.

Whereas the Federal Perkins Loan program is the longest running Federal student 
        loan program in the United States, created in 1958 as the National 
        Defense Student Loan Program and later called the National Direct Loan 
        Program;
Whereas Federal Perkins loans are efficient, need-based, low-interest loans that 
        serve 500,000 low-income college students with high need at 
        approximately 1,500 colleges and universities each year;
Whereas Federal Perkins loans have favorable terms for students, including--

    (1) interest is not charged while a student is in school;

    (2) the interest rate is low and fixed; and

    (3) a borrower may have all or part of a Federal Perkins loans 
cancelled if the borrower undertakes certain public service jobs for a 
period of 1 to 5 years;

Whereas participating colleges and universities share the risk of the Federal 
        Perkins Loan Program because the colleges and universities provide a \1/
        3\ match to Federal capital contributions and loans are made using funds 
        repaid by previous borrowers;
Whereas Federal Perkins loans feature the human touch of campus-based servicing, 
        which allows on-campus administrators to provide Federal Perkins 
        borrowers with 1-on-1 service;
Whereas Federal Perkins loans have made higher education possible for millions 
        of people of the United States; and
Whereas without Federal Perkins loans, thousands of people in the United States 
        will lose the chance at a higher education and a better life: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate strongly supports the continuation of the 
Federal Perkins Loan program in order to provide educational 
opportunities to future generations of students who need low-cost 
financing to make their dreams of higher education possible.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A0043. WILFREDO MONTES v. JAYHILL TRUCKING et al.

Wilfredo Montes seeks to appeal from the superior court’s order affirming a

decision of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation. However, an appeal from a

decision of the superior court reviewing a decision of the State Board of Workers’

Compensation must be brought by application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA

§ 5-6-35 (a) (1); Adivari v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 221 Ga. App. 279, 279 (471 SE2d

59) (1996). Because Montes failed to follow the proper appellate procedure, his

appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Adivari, 221 Ga. App. at

279.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 04, 2022

08/04/2022
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00416

- CV
IN RE ULLJA KUNTZE

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 14, 2017, Kuntze filed a document which is properly characterized
as a petition for writ of mandamus. In a separate proceeding, In Re Kuntze , 10

- 17

- 00384

- CV, we have explained that such a document is not filed within an existing appeal, but

ra ther is docketed as its own proceeding. See In re Kuntze , 10

- 17

- 00384

- CV, 2017 Tex. App.

LEXIS 12038 (Tex. App.

— Waco Dec. 27 , 2017 , orig. proceeding).
In this proceeding, Kuntze is critical of the Clerk of this Court for not responding

to Kuntze’s demands by the deadline set by Kuntze and for failing to notify the trial court
clerk of what Kuntze perceives as deficiencies in the clerk’s record. Kuntze seeks to haveIn re Kuntze Page 2

the Court’s Clerk removed from office. Kuntze’s complaint is frivolous. We do not have
ju risdiction to remove the Clerk in this manner.
Kuntze’s petition is dismissed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Petition dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 3, 2018 [OT06]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

EDWARD SCOTT, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 502 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
#### David HUGHES, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 07-7284.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 25, 2008.

David Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. James Robert Bryden, II, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Hughes seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) *529(2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hughes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### Jason M. RANSOM, petitioner, v. MBNA, AMERICA BANK, N.A.

No. 09-907.

Sept. 28, 2010.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41612-41613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Emergency Beacon Registrations.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0295.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular (extension of a currently approved 
information collection).
    Number of Respondents: 301,231.
    Average Hours per Response: 15 minutes.
    Burden Hours: 75,307.
    Needs and Uses: This request is for an extension of a currently 
approved information collection.
    An international system exists to use satellites to detect and 
locate ships, aircraft, and individuals in distress if they are 
equipped with an emergency radio beacon. Persons purchasing a digital 
distress beacon, operating in the frequency range of 406.000 to 406.100

[[Page 41613]]

MHz, must register it with NOAA. These requirements are contained in 
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations at 47 CFR 80.1061, 
47 CFR 87.199 and 47 CFR 95.1402. The data provided by registration can 
assist in identifying who is in distress and in suppression of false 
alarms.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-
profit organizations; not for profit institutions; federal government; 
state, local or tribal government.
    Frequency: Biannually and on occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d6999f84978985a3b4bbbfa5a5bfb9b896b9bbb4f8b3b9a6f8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a6563786b75795f48474359594345446a454748044f455a044d455c">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: August 29, 2017.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-18621 Filed 8-31-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-HR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF THE chief FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio
Estrada Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,



|1) | the
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the
                                         information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                                         and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By | /s/
    Antonio Estrada Jr. | 
|-- | --------------------------- | 
|   | Antonio
    Estrada Jr.     | 
|   | Chief
    Financial Officer | 
|   | February
    26, 2016       |
#### The Warren.

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

1882.)

Collision in East River — Ferry-Boats—Apportionment and Damages.

A boat, the 0., on her regular trip np the East river from Fulton street to Hunter’s Point, and a ferry-boat, the W.,plying between Grand street, Brooklyn, and Grand street, New York, came in collision a short distance above the ferry-slip, near the New York shore, and the O. was sunk. The O. had como up along the New York piers, to be in the eddy of the tide, which was running down, had *gone*out in the river a little to avoid a steam-boat then making a landing at Grand-street pier, straightened up, and exchanging signals with the W. sheered again out into the river. The W. had stopped when half way across, and, heading nearly down the river to allow the steam-boat above mentioned to go inside and land, then signaled the O. to go to port, and started ahead at the same time to reach her slip. *Held,*that both were in fault, and the damages should be apportioned.

The case of *The Cayuga*(1 Ben. 173 ; 7 Blatchf. 385) distinguished.

In Admiralty.

*H. T. Wing*and *R. D. Benedict,*for libellants.

*Beebe, Wilcox & Hobbs,*for claimant.

Benedict, D. J.

In this case my conclusion is that the collision in question was caused by fault on both sides. The fault on the part of the Olyphant consisted, in keeping near to the New York side of the river as she turned the Hook. The fault on the part of the Warren consisted in starting up for her slip when she did, after seeing the position of the Olyphant. The ease differs from that of *The Cayuga,*relied on by the libellants, in that here the ferry-boat did not hold her course, but stopped under circumstances calculated to induce the Olyphant to adopt a course to pass ahead of her, and then started np again, and blew for the Olyphant to port, when, as the result proved, it was not possible for the Olyphant, with helm hard a-port, to get outside of the ferry-boat before the boats came in contact. Fault on both sides being found, the damages must, of course, be apportioned between the two colliding vessels. An interlocutory decree to that effect will be entered, with an order of reference to ascertain the amount of the damages.