alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1413.1 

CAF 11-00832 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF EMMA J. CASWELL, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

DERRICK D. ORR, SR., 

RESPONDENT-PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

DAVISON LAW OFFICE PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARK C. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

PAUL B. WATKINS, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

CAROLE A. ROWLAND, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, FULTON, FOR DE’NAYAH O.

AND DERRICK O., JR. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Donald

E. Todd, A.J.), entered March 21, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded

physical custody of the subject children to respondent-petitioner. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is 

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Family Court.

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 11

                            HAMPSHIRE GROUP, LIMITED
                   STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>

                                         Three months ended    Six months ended
                                         ------------------    ---------------- 
                                         June 28,   June 29,   June 28, June 29,
                                           1997       1996      1997     1996
                                         -------    -------    -------  -------
                                              (unaudited)        (unaudited)

<S>                                       <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>
Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding .  3,851      3,755      3,851     3,753
                                          =====      =====      =====     =====

Net loss ...............................  ($235)     ($597)     ($496)  ($1,123)
Less - preferred dividend requirements      (42)       (45)       (86)      (93)
Net loss applicable to common stock ..    ($277)     ($642)     ($582)  ($1,216)
                                          =====      =====      =====   =======
Net loss per share applicable to 
  common stock........................   ($0.07)    ($0.17)    ($0.15)   ($0.32)
                                          =====      =====      =====     =====
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 24 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 24

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 
Agency relating to ``Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing 
        Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: 
Electric Utility Generating Units'' (published at 80 Fed. Reg. 64662 
(October 23, 2015)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate November 17, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 24

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 
Agency relating to ``Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing 
        Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units''.
```
Exhibit 34.3



LOGO



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of 2014 Compliance with Applicable
Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (Managements Assertion), that Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) Regulation AB for
services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting (the Platform), including only those asset-backed securities transactions defined below, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014,
excluding the following criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(1)(i-iv), 1122(d)(2)(i-vii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), 1122(d)(4)(i-vi) and 1122(d)(4)(viii-xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Appendix B to managements assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Companys
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the
servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the
Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2014 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ McGladrey LLP

Irvine, California

March 4, 2015
**EXHIBIT
      10.3**




**PROMISSORY
      NOTE**








**Amount:** **$10,000**       Date:
      May
      1, 2008


San
      Antonio, Texas








For
      value
      received from ATSI Communications, Inc. (“Holder”), Fiesta Communications, Inc.
      (“Fiesta”) promises to pay Holder the principal sum of Four Thousand
      dollars ($10,000)  with
      interest from date at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year.




Principal
      is payable in lawful money of the United States of America at 3201 Cherry Ridge,
      Suite C300, San Antonio, Texas 78230 or at such place as may later be designated
      by written notice from the Holder to Fiesta hereof, on the date and in the
      manner following:





All
      principal and accrued interest is due on or before three (3) months from the
      date of this note, or July 31, 2008. ****





This
      Note
      is not secured.





Both
      parties understand that the amount or value above does not exceed the maximum
      interest allowed by law, under the statutes of the state of Texas, and
      acknowledge that the terms are reasonable given the nature of the
      loan.





Fiesta
                Communications, Inc./s/
                Arthur L. SmithMay
                1, 2008
Exhibit 10.11



 







  



	
Glenn MacNeil


1554 Jarvie Crescent


Milton, Ontario


Canada L9T 5Z3

	
December 6, 2011













	
Re: 

	
Purchase of Working Interest in the Liberty #1 Well and Nephi Prospect












Dear Glenn:







This letter will serve to confirm our understanding and agreement for the purchase by you of a 0.50% working interest (WI) in the Liberty #1 Well and in the 1,184-acre leasehold and Nephi Prospect from Richfield Oil & Gas Company (“Richfield”), as follows:







You hereby agree to purchase, and Richfield hereby agrees to sell, assign and convey to you, a 0.50% WI in the Liberty # 1 Well, located in the N/2 Section 34, T12S, R1E, SLB&M, Juab County, Utah, and in the surrounding 1,184-acre leasehold, subject to the conditions of the joint operating agreement (JOA) to which you are already a signatory as non-operator.  The working interest being conveyed is fully paid-up through the next completion operation, involving the side-track drilling of a lateral to the Navajo Sandstone.  Thereafter the working interest shall bear its share of all costs.  Seller makes no warranty as to value, quantity, or production from such well.







The purchase price of the working interest shall be $50,000.  Because there is no brokerage fee payable, you shall also receive an 8% credit, or $4,000, to your JIB account.








	  	
Very truly yours,


	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	
/s/ J. David Gowdy


	  	  	
J. David Gowdy, President












ACCEPTED & AGREED:








	
By:

	
/s/ Glenn MacNeil

	 	
Dated: December 6, 2011


	  	
Glenn MacNeil

	 	  





 


15 W. South Temple, Suite 1050, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 • Office 801.519.8500
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

#### Alexandria Toyota, Inc. v. City of Alexandria

November 15, 2002

Case No. (Law) CL020320

By Judge Alfred D. Swersky

Defendant City of Alexandria’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted, and Plaintiff Alexandria Toyota, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be denied.

The material facts, stipulated to, reflect a sufficient basis in law for the Director of Finance to refuse the waiver of the penalty assessed for Plaintiff’s late filing of its tangible personal property tax schedule. Pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3916, such penalties shall not be imposed if “the failure was not the fault of the taxpayer....” Here, the facts show a misunderstanding between Plaintiff and its accountant as to whether it or its accountant was to file the schedule.

In certain opinions of the Attorney General, the statutory requirement of fault was divided into two components. The first being a purposeful failure in the performance of a duty, and the second, engaging in conduct that materially contributed to the problem complained of. There is no evidence that would support a finding of purposeful conduct; however, under these facts, the Director could conclude that the taxpayer engaged in conduct that materially contributed to the failure.

Plaintiff’s argument that by Resolution 1536 the City Council changed the basis to be used by the Director in making his determination is without merit. The standard under this Resolution is the same as under § 58.1-3916.
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2336 

AN ACT 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

segments of the York River and associated tributaries 

for study for potential inclusion in the National Wild 

and Scenic Rivers System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2336 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘York River Wild and 

3 Scenic River Study Act of 2012’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY. 

5 Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(l) YORK RIVER, MAINE.—(A) The York 

9 River that flows 11.25 miles from its headwaters at 

10 York Pond to the mouth of the river at York Har11 bor, and all associated tributaries. 

12 ‘‘(B) The study conducted under this paragraph 

13 shall— 

14 ‘‘(i) determine the effect of the designation 

15 on— 

16 ‘‘(I) existing commercial and rec17 reational activities, such as hunting, fish18 ing, trapping, recreational shooting, motor 

19 boat use, bridge construction; 

20 ‘‘(II) the authorization, construction, 

21 operation, maintenance, or improvement of 

22 energy production and transmission infra23 structure; and 

24 ‘‘(III) the authority of State and local 

25 governments to manage those activities; 

26 and 
3 

•HR 2336 EH

1 ‘‘(ii) identify— 

2 ‘‘(I) all authorities that will authorize 

3 or require the Secretary to influence local 

4 land use decisions (such as zoning) or 

5 place restrictions on non-Federal land if 

6 designated under this Act; 

7 ‘‘(II) all authorities that the Secretary 

8 may use to condemn property; and 

9 ‘‘(III) all private property located in 

10 the area studied under this paragraph.’’. 

11 SEC. 3. STUDY AND REPORT. 

12 Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

13 U.S.C. 1276(b)) is amended by adding at the end the fol14 lowing: 

15 ‘‘(l) YORK RIVER, MAINE.—The study of the 

16 York River, Maine, named in paragraph (l) of sub17 section (a) shall be completed by the Secretary of 

18 the Interior and the report thereon submitted to 

19 Congress not later than 3 years after the date on 
4 

•HR 2336 EH

1 which funds are made available to carry out this 

2 paragraph.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2336 

AN ACT 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to desNational Wild and Scenic Rivers System. tributaries for study for potential inclusion in the ignate segments of the York River and associated
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6858

LORD VERSATILE, a/k/a Venson Leon Coward,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LORETTA KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison; A. F. MILLER, 

Operations Officer, Sussex I State Prison; L. RODRIGUES, 

Correctional Officer Sgt., Sussex I State Prison; G. DAVIS, 

Correctional Officer, Sussex I State Prison; H. MAVOR, Sgt., 

Hearing Officer, Sussex I State Prison; R. TUELL, Captain, 

Sussex I State Prison; A. DAVID ROBINSON, Regional Director, 

Eastern Office; GENE M. JOHNSON, Former Director, VDOC; R. 

W. SPROUSE, Intel-Officer, Sussex I State Prison; W. BROWN, 

IHO, Sussex I State Prison; K. FOWLKES, Former Unit Manager,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

D. HUDSON, Grievance Coordinator, Sussex I State Prison; 

SHARON S. BURGESS, Regional Office Appeals Manager; MELISSA 

WELCH, Offender Discipline Unit Manager; JOHN M. JABE, 

Deputy Director, VDOC; T. FOWLKES, Unit Manager, Sussex I 

State Prison,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:11-cv-00308-HEH)

Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 2, 2012
2

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lord Versatile, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Lord Versatile appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.* 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Versatile v. Kelly, No. 3:11-cv-00308-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 

13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

 * On appeal, Versatile does not contest the district court’s 

dismissal of two of his claims without prejudice to his right to 

refile the claims in new complaints.
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreements governing the securities listed on Exhibit A, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period 1/1/15 to 12/31/15, (the Reporting Period) and of the Servicers performance
under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 29th day of February 2016.



|       |  |                      
|------ |  | ---------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Michael Blair    
|Name:  |  | Michael Blair        
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President



---

Exhibit A

Securities Covered in Cenlar FSBs Servicer Compliance Statement 1123:

Redwood Trust, Inc.



|         |  |                                       |  |             |  |                                  
|-------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Investor |  | Issuer                                |  | Security    |  | *Period
Subserviced by Cenlar
FSB
|H06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-1 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|K06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-2 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|L06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-3 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|Z06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-4 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|Y06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-5 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW0      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-6 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW1      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-1 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW2/S11  |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-2 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW3      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-3 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW4      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-4 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW5      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-5 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW6      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-6 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW7      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-7 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      10,035,748
<SECURITIES>                                 6,014,327
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,310,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,316,690
<PP&E>                                       9,357,618
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,267,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,571,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,551,430
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       171,176
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,849,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,571,714
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               495,130
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,653,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,855,626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,855,626)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,855,626)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2017 (the “Report”) of Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mel Carlisle , the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    Mel CarlisleName:    Mel CarlisleDate:December 8, 2017