alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Developmental Biology Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         October 2, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Residence Inn Bethesda Downtown, 7335 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Cathy J. Wedeen, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, OD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS, 6710 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 301-435-6878,                         *wedeenc@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 6, 2017.

Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-19232 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elmer Antonio MADRIGALESREYES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-20884.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 24, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Joe A Salmas, III, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elmer Madrigales-Reyes appeals the sentence that followed his guilty-plea conviction of conspiracy to transport and harbor undocumented aliens for commercial advantage and private financial gain in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. For the first time on appeal, he challenges the upward departure made pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.8, p.s. He argues that the district court erred by both applying the two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3A1.3 and *614departing upwardly based on the same conduct; that the court should have applied another guideline provision instead of the § 3A1.3 increase or the upward departure; and that the circumstances did not rise to the level of extreme conduct to justify the upward departure. Madrigales-Reyes has not shown that the court plainly erred. *United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 731-37, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993); *United States v. Anderson,*5 F.3d 795, 804 (5th Cir.1993).

Madrigales-Reyes asserts for the first time on appeal, without further argument or citation to authority, that the court should not have applied the U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(2)(C) increase for more than one hundred aliens or the two-level increase under § 3A1.3 while also departing upwardly based on factors that applied to only a few of the aliens. MadrigalesReyes has not adequately briefed and, thus, has waived these arguments. *See Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.1993); *see also United States v. Flores,*63 F.3d 1342, 1374 n. 36 (5th Cir.1995).

Madrigales-Reyes contends the district court erred in applying the nine-level enhancement pursuant to § 2Ll.l(b)(2)(C) because there is no evidence affirmatively linking him to more than one hundred aliens. Based on the facts in the presentence report, and absent any rebuttal evidence contesting those facts, the court was permitted to accept as true the fact that Madrigales-Reyes’s conspiracy offense involved more than one hundred aliens. *See United States v. Washington,*480 F.3d 309, 320 (5th Cir.2007). The determination that the offense involved more than one hundred aliens is plausible in light of the record as a whole and is therefore upheld. *United States v. Angeles-Mendoza,*407 F.3d 742, 750 (5th Cir.2005). The district court also did not procedurally err in sentencing Madrigales-Reyes, who does not challenge the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. *See Gall v. United States,*- U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40512

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANGEL SILVESTRE ARELLANO-RIOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-50-1

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Angel Silvestre Arellano-Rios pleaded guilty to being an

alien unlawfully found in the United States after deportation,

having previously been convicted of an aggravated felony, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). The district court

sentenced him to serve 87 months of imprisonment and three years

of supervised release.

For the first time on appeal, Arellano-Rios argues that the

“felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions set forth in 8 U.S.C.
No. 04-40512

-2-

§ 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), because they do not require the

fact of a prior felony or aggravated felony conviction to be

charged in the indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. 

As Arellano-Rios concedes, his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 234-35 (1998). 

See United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). 

Arellano-Rios also argues for the first time on appeal that

if Almendarez-Torres is overruled, the Supreme Court’s holding in

Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 2537 (2004), renders

unconstitutional the district court’s calculation of his sentence

under the United States Sentencing Guidelines based on facts

relating to his prior convictions that were neither found by a

jury beyond a reasonable doubt nor admitted by him. ArellanoRios concedes that in addition to the obstacle posed by

Almendarez-Torres, his argument regarding the effect of Blakely

is foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 465-66

(5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004)

(No. 04-5263), in which this court held that Blakely does not

extend to the United States Sentencing Guidelines.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of
operations filed as a part of the quarterly report on Form 10Q and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such quarterly report of Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000887150
<NAME>                          Charles Clayton
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<CURRENCY>                      US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1
<CASH>                            9,671
<SECURITIES>                        143
<RECEIVABLES>                    11,387
<ALLOWANCES>                     (2,553)
<INVENTORY>                      31,424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 57,764
<PP&E>                            9,697
<DEPRECIATION>                   (7,162)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   98,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             7,388
<BONDS>                          26,480
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                            418
<OTHER-SE>                       64,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     98,344
<SALES>                          27,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 29,310
<CGS>                            23,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    23,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  8,706
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,633)
<INCOME-TAX>                        150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (2,783)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     (2,783)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (0.68)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMMUNITY CENTRAL BANK
CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND THE
CONSOLIDATED OF OPERATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,730
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                24,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     12,669
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,223
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,198
<LOANS>                                        159,307
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (2,338)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,993
<DEPOSITS>                                     182,203
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,086
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                923
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,310
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 207,993
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,688
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  693
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   822
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,203
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,144
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,367
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,836
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      495
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,874
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,210
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.20
<LOANS-NON>                                        600
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,924
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      105
<RECOVERIES>                                        21
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,338
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of MiX Telematics Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | the report, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: July 14, 2017


By: /s/ Stefan Joselowitz


Stefan Joselowitz


Chief Executive Officer








Date: July 14, 2017


By: /s/ Paul Dell


Paul Dell


Interim Chief Financial Officer
PROMISSORY NOTE



 Exhibit 10.2 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	$1,224,000.00	  	December 16, 2011

 For value received, Macho Uno Racing Corporation, a Delaware corporation having an address at 901 South
Federal Highway, Hallandale Beach, Florida 33009 (“Borrower”), promises to pay to the order of The Alpen House Racing ULC, an Alberta unlimited liability company, (“Lender”), at its office in Aurora, Ontario, Canada (or at such
other location as Lender may direct), in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds, on the Maturity Date (as hereafter defined), the principal sum of One Million Two Hundred Twenty-Four Thousand Dollars and No
Cents ($1,224,000.00), together with interest on the unpaid principal balance hereof at the rate of 0.19% per annum, compounded annually on each anniversary of the date hereof, from and including the date hereof to but excluding the date of
payment. As used herein, “Maturity Date” shall mean the earlier of (i) December 16, 2014 and (ii) the date of consummation of an offering of equity securities of Borrower pursuant to which net proceeds from the sale of such
equity securities to persons other than affiliates of Lender or Borrower equal or exceed the amount then due under this Note. This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty or premium. An “Event of Default” shall
occur hereunder if the principal of and all accrued and unpaid interest on this Note shall not have been paid in full by 5:00 Eastern Standard Time on the Maturity Date. 
 Borrower shall pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and legal expenses, if this Note is not paid when due, whether or not legal proceedings are commenced. 

Presentment for payment, demand, notice of dishonor and protest and any and all other notices and defenses, including but not limited to
set-off and counterclaim, are expressly waived. 
 This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Florida without giving effect to conflicts of law provisions thereof. 
  

			
	 MACHO UNO RACING CORPORATION
 a Delaware corporation, as Borrower

		
	By:	 	/s/ Lyle Strachan
	Name:	 	Lyle Strachan
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
EX-35.11


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
c/o Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
375 Park Avenue 2nd floor
J0127-023
New York, New York 10152-023

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust
    2013-LC12, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-LC12

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2013 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 10, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
**Exhibit 31.2**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION  I, Kendall W. Rieman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Croghan Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrolsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usbyothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrolsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: October 26, 2006 /s/  Kendall W. Rieman   Kendall W. Rieman, Treasurer   (Principal Financial Officer)   
20