alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

 

 

 

 

1123 – Servicer Compliance Statement Transactions Listed With SEC

 

 

 

I, Bradley Wayman, Senior Vice President of CitiMortgage, Inc., certify that:

 

(a)A review of CitiMortgage, Inc. (the “Servicer”) activities during the 12 month period ending December 31st, 2021 (“Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement as identified on Schedule A has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

|                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------|
| February 25, 2022                                |
| By: /s/ Bradley Wayman                           |
| Name: Bradley Wayman                             |
| Title: Senior Vice President, CitiMortgage, Inc. |

 

|                                   |                                        |                                       |                                      |                                       |                                                    |                                             |                                                                             |                      |          |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------|
| Schedule A                        |
| Transactions Listed with SEC 2021 |
| CitiMortgage 

Bond Administrator | CRLI Primary Servicing (Investor Code) | CMI Primary Servicing (Investor Cody) | Cenlar Sub-Servicing (Investor Code) | CMI- Master Servicing (Investor Code) | CMI Primary Bonds (Bond # or GSE Investor Block #) | Security or Deal                            | Party the Servicer is Reporting To (Master Servicer or Trustee or Investor) | CBNA Doc 

Custodian | Footnote |
|                              |                                   |                                  |                                 | 7800                                  |                                               | SEQUOIA MORTGAGE TRUST 2013-8 (SEMT 2013-8) | WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION                                      |                 |     |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LON DERRICK CARTER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
NICK DAWSON ; KATHY MENDOZA

POWERS,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 15575

D.C. No. 1:07

- cv
- 01325

- AWI

BAM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 25, 2016 **

Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Lon Derrick Carter appeals pro se from the district
court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional

violations in connection with his conditions of confinement . We review de novo ,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 3 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 15575

Toguchi v. Chung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because Carter failed
to raise a genuine dispute o f fact as to whether defendants caused Carter to contract

a bacterial infection. See Harper v. Cit y of L os Angeles , 533 F.3d 1010, 1026 (9th

Cir. 2008) (“In a § 198 3 action, the plaintiff must . . . demonstrate that the

defendant’ s conduct was the actionable cause of the claimed injury.”).

The district court properly denied Carter’ s Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) motion to
continue summary judgment to allow further discovery because Carter failed to
identify specific facts to be obtained in discovery that would have precluded
summary judgment. See Qualls By & Through Qualls v. Blue Cross of Cal., Inc .,
22 F .3d 839, 844 (9th Cir. 1994) (setting forth standard of review; district court
properly denied Rule 56(f) (now Rule 56(d)) motion where additional requested
discovery would not have precluded summary judgment)

.
The district court did not abuse its discreti on in denying Carter’s motions to

strike the declarations of J. Buck and L. Hansen. See El Pollo Loco, Inc. v.

Hashim , 316 F.3d 1032, 1041 (9th Cir. 2003) ( standard of review ).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 11.1

     Computation of fully-diluted earnings per share, using
25,531,420 weighted average shares outstanding.

                                                        Amount       Per Share
Net income                                            $26,411,000      $1.03

Calculation of number of weighted average
   fully-diluted shares:
Proceeds from assumed exercise of options              $18,623,125
Divided by quarter ended September 30, 1997
   average closing price of common stock                   $31.375
Equals number of shares assumed purchased
   under treasury stock method                             593,566
Number of shares assumed purchased through 
   exercise of options                                     910,000
Less number of shares assumed purchased
   under treasury stock method                             593,566
Equals additional shares assumed outstanding
   for fully-diluted earnings per share computation        316,434
Plus weighted average number of shares
   outstanding                                          25,214,986
Equals weighted average number of shares
   outstanding, fully-diluted EPS calculations          25,531,420
| (logo) Rialto 

CAPITAL |  

  |
|-------------------------|----------------|

 

 

 

 

2014 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

                 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of  June 1, 2013  by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC, as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C14, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C14  **(WFRBS 2013-C14)**

 

                

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.        All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.        A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

 

Certified by:  /s/  Adam Singer                                                                                Date:  March 5, 2015

       Adam Singer, Managing Director
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

**Annual Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Avianca Holdings S.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 29, 2016 

 

Section 906 CFO Certification
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                       49,387
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             49,387
<PP&E>                                      806,711
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              856,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           (65)
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     11,204
<OTHER-SE>                                1,260,538                           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                856,098
<SALES>                                         326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                326
<CGS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             17,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                17,411
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (17,085)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF THOMAS J. WEBB
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CMS Energy Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Dated:  March 1, 2010
    
    By
    
    /s/ Thomas J. WebbThomas J. WebbExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19006]



[[Page 42349]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than September 21, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Kathryn Haney, Director of 
Applications) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#713001011d18121005181e1f025f321e1c1c141f05023110051d5f1703135f1e0316"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="226352524e4b4143564b4d4c510c614d4f4f474c56516243564e0c4450400c4d5045">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Joseph Huntley Johnson III, Birmingham, Alabama, Lawrence Harris 
Johnson, Birmingham, Alabama, and James Hughes Johnson, Tuscaloosa, 
Alabama; to become part of the Johnson Family Control Group and thereby 
retain voting shares of SNB Holdings, Inc., Slocomb, Alabama, and its 
subsidiary Friend Bank, Slocomb, Alabama.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 1, 
2017.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-19006 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,180
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              16
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     31,847
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          36,927
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            36,674
<LOANS>                                        251,795
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 356,263
<DEPOSITS>                                     278,083
<SHORT-TERM>                                    36,881
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,523
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,902
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 356,263
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,964
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,993
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    44
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,001
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,199
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,063
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,938
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      295
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,057
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,057
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,685
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.58
<LOANS-NON>                                        353
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,855
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,166
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,196
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      581
<RECOVERIES>                                       278
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,188
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,188
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6793
JOSE FRANCISCO NOESI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. A. BLEDSOE; MICHAEL MCCLAIN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-05-141-7-SGW) Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 5, 2005 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Francisco Noesi, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jose Francisco Noesi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens v. Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Noesi v. Bledsoe , No. CA-05-141-7-SGW (W.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42725-42726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The

[[Page 42726]]

Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and 
suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 25, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gretchen Swayzer at 1-888-912-1227 or 
469-801-0769.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Wednesday, October 25, 2017, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time via 
teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. For more information please 
contact: Gretchen Swayzer at 1-888-912-1227 or 469-801-0769, TAP 
Office, 4050 Alpha Rd, Farmers Branch, TX 75244, or contact us at the 
Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to 
the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

    Dated: September 1, 2017.
Antoinette Ross,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2017-19195 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
CIRCUIT COURT OF SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY

#### Maurice Watson v. Ronald T. Knight

June 4, 2003

Case No. CL02-523

By Judge William H. Ledbetter, Jr.

In this suit against the Sheriff of Spotsylvania County, Watson claims that the officers who arrested him on a drug charge stole money from him. The Sheriff has demurred and filed a plea in bar on the basis of sovereign immunity.

*Background*

Watson was arrested on a felony drug charge on June 29, 2000. He was searched and cash was taken from him. Cash was turned over to the evidence clerk of the Sheriffs Office, who, in turn, delivered it to the Treasurer of the County. The evidence clerk receipted $948.00, and the treasurer receipted $948.00. Watson alleges that he had more than $948.00 and that the remainder of his money was stolen by the arresting officers. He made these allegations in his criminal case (No. CR00-620), in a related forfeiture case (No. CL00-263), and in his pleadings in this suit.

The court heard Knight’s and Watson’s arguments on the demurrer and plea on June 2, 2003, and took the matter under advisement.

*124
      *Decision*

In his demurrer, Knight asserts that there are no facts alleged that pertain to him. He points out that he is not even mentioned in the motion for judgment other than to be named the defendant in the case.

The court agrees with the Sheriff and sustains the demurrer. The pleading filed by Watson fails to state a claim against Sheriff Knight.

Watson will be granted leave to amend his pleading, if he be so advised, to join the appropriate parties, i.e., those persons who allegedly stole his money. He will be given twenty-one days from entry of the order sustaining the demurrer to file any amended pleadings, and, of course, the new defendants will be given twenty-one days after service upon them to respond.

The Sheriff would not be protected by the doctrine of sovereign immunity if he stole the money or otherwise participated in such an intentional tort. However, the only basis upon which the Sheriff could be liable under Watson’s alleged facts is simply that he is the supervisor/boss of the officers that supposedly took the money. That allegation sounds in simple negligence, vicarious liability, to which the doctrine does apply.

Thus, the plea and the demurrer will be sustained.