alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF THE chief FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
(the “Report”) of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30,
2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada Jr., the Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | By: | /s/ Antonio
Estrada, Jr.
| | --- | ------------------------
| |     | Antonio
Estrada, Jr.    
| |     | Chief
Financial Officer 
| |     | June 14, 2018
EX-10.K



 Exhibit 10 (k) 
 GREIF, INC. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 

TO THE 

2001 MANAGEMENT EQUITY INCENTIVE AND COMPENSATION PLAN 
 The 2001 Management Equity Incentive and Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended pursuant to the following provisions: 

1. Definitions: For the purposes of the Plan and this amendment, all capitalized terms used in this amendment which are not
otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings given such terms in the Plan. 
 2. Amendment:
Section 25 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “Section 25. Term of Plan. 

No Award shall be granted pursuant to the Plan on or after the fifteenth anniversary of the Effective Date, but Awards granted prior to
such fifteenth anniversary may extend beyond that date.” 
 3. Effective Date; Construction: The effective date of
this amendment is February 28, 2011 and this amendment shall be deemed to be part of the Plan as of such date. In the event of any inconsistencies between the provisions of the Plan and this amendment, the provisions of this amendment shall
control. Except as modified by this amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect without change.
Exhibit 32.1


   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                                      2002

         In connection with the filing of Zunicom, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company")  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),I,  William Tan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350,
as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;
                    and

                (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                    in all material respects, the financial condition and
                    results of operations of the Company,


/s/ William Tan
--------------------
William Tan
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)

August 16, 2004



























                               Exhibit 32.1 - 1
1

The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1563

___________

Adonis Johnson, Sr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Unilever HPC USA, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: January 6, 2005

Filed: January 24, 2005

___________

Before BYE, MELLOY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Adonis Johnson, Sr., appeals the adverse grant of summary judgment in his

employment-discrimination action. The district court1

 concluded Johnson’s

complaint was barred by res judicata. Upon careful review of the record, we agree,

for the reasons explained by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________
----

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                                                         |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                at the dates and for the periods                indicated. |

|                                                                        |        |        |                                                                       |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                         |        |   |                                                                  |
|  /s/              ROBERT A. WHITMAN                               |        |        |  /s/              STEPHEN D. YOUNG                               |
| Robert                A. WhitmanChief                Executive Officer |        |        | Stephen                D. YoungChief                Financial Officer |
| Date:                January 10, 2008                                  |   |   | Date:                January 10,                2008                  |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, William S. Creekmuir, as Chief Financial Officer of Simmons Bedding Company
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

            (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
      ended September 24, 2005 (the "Report"), being filed with the U.S.
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: November 3, 2005                      /s/ William S. Creekmuir
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Name:  William S. Creekmuir
                                            Title:  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simmons Bedding Company and will be retained by Simmons Bedding
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2210

LT Case No. 2018-CF-00102-A 

_____________________________

ROBERT JOHNATHEN 

ALEXANDER, 

Petitioner, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Respondent. 

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal. 

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Robert Jonathen Alexander, Milton, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock 

McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Respondent. 

September 8, 2023

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this 

opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the 

notice of appeal from the July 21, 2022 order denying motion for 

postconviction relief filed in Case No. 2018-CF-00102-A, Seminole

County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 
2 

PETITION GRANTED. 

WALLIS, LAMBERT, and SOUD, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 294 

Designating October 26, 2015, as Day of the Deployed. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 22, 2015 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. ROBERTS, Ms. HEITKAMP, and 

Mr. PETERS) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 26, 2015, as Day of the Deployed. 

Whereas more than 2,000,000 individuals serve as members 

of the Armed Forces of the United States; 

Whereas several hundred thousand members of the Armed 

Forces rotate each year through deployments to 150 

countries in every region of the world; 

Whereas more than 2,700,000 members of the Armed Forces 

have deployed to the area of operations of the United 

States Central Command since the September 11, 2001 

terrorist attacks; 

Whereas the United States is kept strong and free by the 

loyal military personnel from the total force (the regular 

components, the National Guard, and the Reserves), who 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 294 ATS 

protect the precious heritage of the United States 

through their declarations and actions; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces serving at home and 

abroad have courageously answered the call to duty to 

defend the ideals of the United States and to preserve 

peace and freedom around the world; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces personify the virtues 

of patriotism, service, duty, courage, and sacrifice; 

Whereas the families of members of the Armed Forces make 

important and significant sacrifices for the United 

States; and 

Whereas the Senate designated October 26 as ‘‘Day of the 

Deployed’’ in 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 26, 2015, as ‘‘Day of 

3 the Deployed’’; 

4 (2) honors the deployed members of the Armed 

5 Forces of the United States and the families of the 

6 members; 

7 (3) calls on the people of the United States to 

8 reflect on the service of those members of the Armed 

9 Forces, wherever the members serve, past, present, 

10 and future; and 

11 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

12 to observe Day of the Deployed with appropriate 

13 ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 89 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 89

  To repeal the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 7, 2015

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Takeover Repeal Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
(Public Law 111-203) is repealed, and the provisions of law amended by 
such Act are revived or restored as if such Act had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ending April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada, Corporate Controller and
      Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C,
      ss.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,





1)
            the
                Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
            the
                information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





By
/s/
      Antonio Estrada


Antonio
      Estrada


Corporate
      Controller and


Principal
      Financial Officer


June
      13,
      2006
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00523

- CV
IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF LEON R. BERNSEN, SR., AN ALLEGED INCAPACITATED PERSON

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- GU

- 00099

- 5

- A

JUDGMENT THE T H IRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this de c ision certified below for observance. February 25, 2021
#### Daniel D. Tavares vs. Commonwealth.

March 4, 2008.

*Supreme Judicial Court,*

Superintendence of inferior courts.

The case was submitted on briefs.

*Daniel D. Tavares,*pro se.

*Julia K. Holler,*Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

Daniel D. Tavares appeals from the denial, without a hearing, of his petition for relief in the county court pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, in which he claimed that his convictions, based on his guilty pleas, were duplicative.1 For the reasons stated in *Tavares*v. *Commonwealth,*447 Mass. 1011 (2006), the single justice properly denied relief.

*Judgment affirmed.*

1

Tavares’s petition also sought mlings (either from the single justice or from the full court) on questions of law relating to his sentences. In his brief on appeal, however, Tavares presents no argument concerning those questions. Tavares has also presented an additional question, concerning his larceny convictions, in a separate petition to this court. That question was not before the single justice and is not properly before us. Furthermore, each of Tavares’s questions could have been raised in an appropriate postconviction motion.
biostem_ex104.htm


Exhibit 10.4


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), is executed on September 3, 2011, by and between Biostem U.S. Corporation, a Florida corporation (the “Company”), and John Satino (“Employee”). All capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in that certain Employment Agreement dated June 1, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”). In consideration of the premises, terms, conditions and covenants set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.   Amendment. Employee hereby waives and forgives any accrued but unpaid Base Compensation which may be outstanding as of the date hereof. Further, Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:


 


2.1           Base Compensation. In consideration of the services rendered to the Company (and/or its Affiliates) by Employee, during the Term (as defined in Section 3), until such time as the parties otherwise agree, Employee shall receive annual compensation of $ 1 (one dollar) , payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll schedule (the “Base Compensation”).


 


2.   No Other Amendments. Except as specifically amended pursuant to this Amendment, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms, and each party hereto hereby confirms and agrees to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.


 


3.   Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


4.   Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Florida.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 





	 	 	EMPLOYEE:	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
 

	 	 
	 	 	John Satino	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COMPANY	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Biostem U.S. Corporation	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	 	 
	 	Name:	 	 
	 	Title:
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 253 

Welcoming King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia of Spain on their official 

visit to the United States, including visits to Miami and St. Augustine, 

Florida. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 

Mr. NELSON (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. KAINE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Welcoming King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia of Spain on 

their official visit to the United States, including visits 

to Miami and St. Augustine, Florida. 

Whereas King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia of Spain are visiting St. Augustine, Florida, to celebrate the 450th Commemoration of the city and to participate in the annual 

United States-Spain Council forum; 

Whereas Spanish explorer Ponce de Leo ́n landed on the east 

coast of Florida in 1513 and named the land he discovered La Florida; 

Whereas St. Augustine was founded by Spanish admiral 

Pedro Mene ́ndez de Avile ́s on September 8, 1565; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 253 IS 

Whereas St. Augustine is the oldest continuously occupied 

European settlement in the United States; 

Whereas the United States-Spain Council serves an important purpose in bringing the United States and Spain 

closer through trade, investment, education, and culture, 

as well as by fostering military cooperation between the 

2 countries; 

Whereas the United States-Spain Council is holding its annual forum in St. Augustine from September 18–20, 

2015; 

Whereas the people and Governments of the United States 

and Spain have both benefitted from strong economic and 

cultural ties; 

Whereas Spain has played a special role in the history and 

culture of St. Augustine and Florida; and 

Whereas King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia met with President Barack Obama on September 15, 2015, for their 

first official visit to the White House: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) welcomes King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia 

3 of Spain during their visit to the United States; and 

4 (2) expresses its appreciation for the efforts of 

5 King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia to strengthen the 

6 bonds between the people and Governments of the 

7 United States and Spain. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Robert M. Restaino, as Judge of the Niagara Falls City Court, Niagara County, Petitioner. State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Respondent.

Submitted February 11, 2008;

decided February 14, 2008

Judge Pigott taking no part.
December 6, 2011 Exhibit 10.3





                    Exhibit 10.3 



SECOND AMENDMENT

Technology License, Marketing & Collaboration Agreement

This second Amendment, dated and made effective as of September 1, 2011 is entered into by and between Cavitation
Technologies, Inc ("Licensor") and N.V. Desmet Ballestra Group S.A. ("Licensee").


RECITALS

WHEREAS, Licensor and Licensee entered into a Technology License, Marketing & Collaboration Agreement as of
November 1, 2010 ("Agreement")

WHEREAS, Licensor and Licensee entered into a First Amendment made effective as of June 1, 2011 ("First
Amendment")

WHEREAS, Licensor and Licensee desire to further amend certain provisions within the Agreement as provided herein.  

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in the Agreement and this
Second Amendment to said Agreement, the Licensor and Licensee agree as follows:

1.    The exclusive nature of the rights and license granted to Licensee under Section 2.01 of the original Technology License,
Marketing & collaboration Agreement and ARTICLE X, par.  10.01 (b)shall be amended as follows:

   The exclusive nature of the rights and licenses granted to 

Licensee under this second Amendment is based on the assumption that Licensee will market and install at Facilities a minimum of
(a) ten (10) Nano Reactor Units by June 2010 and (b) twenty (20) additional Units by June 2013, and (c) twenty (20) Units during each
subsequent year of the Primary Term (in each such year the "Minimum Annual Units").  Should Licensee fail to
complete the placement, installation or integration of the Minimum Annual Units at Facilities during any year of the Primary
Term, Licensor shall have the right, by written notice to License, to convert the exclusive rights and licenses granted to Licensee under
Section 2.01 and this second Amendment to a non-exclusive licenses and right during the remaining term of the Agreement.  


2.  Licensor and Licensee agree that the order of precedence of the agreements is a) this Second Amendment dated September 1,
2011, b) the First Amendment dated June 1, 2011 and c) the Agreement dated November 1, 2010.









3.  Licensor and Licensee agree that this Second Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed an original.


4.  Licensor and Licensee agree to accept facsimile signatures on this First Amendment with the same effect as original signatures.



IN WITNESS THEREOF, Licensor and Licensee have executed this First Amendment as of the date of last to sign below.




	
CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES

   By:        /s/ Todd Zelek

   Name:  Todd Zelek 

   Title:     Chief Executive Officer

   Date:     September 1, 2011

	 	
N.V. DESMET BALLESTRA S.A

   By:       /s/ M. Kellens  b.v.b.a.

   Name:  Marc Kellens

   Title: Group Technical Director

   Date:     September 2, 2011