alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

      ( print page 42861)    

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         September 12, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 6, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 349 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2017-185, CP2017-286.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-19270 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the
Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Form 10-Q.
 Dated: November 10, 2008
    /s/ Jeffrey A. GreenJeffrey A. GreenChief Executive Officer
NO. 07-07 -007 1-CV IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL C AU GU ST 7, 2 007

_________

_________

_________

___ ROQUE ARANDA, APP ELL ANT

V. D. GLE NN , LAW LIB RA RI AN II , ET A L., APPEL LEES

_________

_________

_________

______ POTTER CO UN TY, H ON ORABLE HA L M IN ER , J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRT LE, JJ. ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON Appel lan t, Roq ue Aranda, filed a no ti ce of appeal from a Prefili ng Order - Vex ati ous Lit ig ant, entered F ebr uar y 14, 2 007. The c ler k’ s record w as filed on M ar ch 6, 20 07, a nd there i s n ot a re por

ter ’s r e co rd p e r the d ock eti ng st atement filed by appel lan t. By

l etter dated Jul y

3, 2007, the cl er k of t his co urt not ified appel lan t t hat h is br ief w as due J une 4, 2007, but h ad y et t o be filed . See T EX . R. A PP . P. 3 8 .6 (a). The l etter furth er adv is ed a p p e l l a n tt h a tt h e a p p e a l w o u l d b e su bj e c tto d i s mi s s a l fo r w a n to f p ro s e c u t i o n i f t h e b r i e f, or a respon se re asona bly ex pla ini ng the failu re to file a br ief and show ing thatappel lee s2

had notbeen inj ured by the del ay , w as not fil ed by Ju ly 13, 2 0 0 7 . N o b rief , moti on for extens ion , or

othe r re spons e has been re cei v ed. Acc ordin g ly , w e now

di sm iss the appeal for w ant o f pros ecut ion and failu re to compl y w it h a d irect iv e of the cour t. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 3 8.8( a) (1 ), 42.3 (b ), ( c) .
Mackey K. Hancock Justice
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50434 **consolidated with No. 21** 

**- 50435**  Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Andres Pascual**

**- Mendez,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**
Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 317

- 1 USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 562

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Higginson,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * Andres Pascual

- Mendez appeals his conviction and sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2), along with the revocation of the term of

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 13, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50434 Document: 00516128140 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/13/2021No. 21

- 50434 c/w No. 21

- 50435

2 supervised release he was serving at the time of the offense. Because his appellate brief does not address the validity of the revocation or the revocation sentence, he abandons any challenge to that judgment. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224

- 25 ( 5th Cir. 1993). For the first time on appeal, Pascual

- Mendez contends that it violates the Constitution to treat a prior conviction that increases the statutory maximum under § 1326(b)(2) as a sentencing factor, rather than an element of the offense. He c orrectly concedes that the argument is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he wishes to preserve it for further review. The Government has moved without opposition for summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an ext ension of time to file its brief. As the Government asserts and as Pascual

- Mendez concedes, the sole issue raised on appeal is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres

. See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda

Arrell ano , 492 F.3d 624, 625

- 26 (5th Cir. 2007). Because the Government’s position “is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case,” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), summary affirmance is proper. Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , and the judgments of the district court are **AFFIRMED** . The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time is **DENIED**

. Case: 21-50434 Document: 00516128140 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/13/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         986,872
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  788,365
<ALLOWANCES>                                   147,782
<INVENTORY>                                     51,793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,694,901
<PP&E>                                         829,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                 329,375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,189,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          813,658
<BONDS>                                      5,462,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,938
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,906,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,189,314
<SALES>                                      1,222,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,222,487
<CGS>                                          555,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,196,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             196,969
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (202,044)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (202,044)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (202,044)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-0312V

Filed: July 30, 2015

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JOVAN RAGIA, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

v. * Tetanus, Diphtheria, acellular Pertussis

* Vaccine (“Tdap”); Shoulder Injury

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Related to Vaccine Administration

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit

* (“SPU”)

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

John Howie, Jr., Esq., Howie Law, P.C., Dallas, TX, for petitioner.

Claudia Gangi, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

On March 26, 2015, Jovan Ragia filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

[the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury 

caused by the tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine he received on 

April 16, 2014. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 21. Petitioner also alleges that his injuries lasted

more than six months and that he continues to suffer the residual effects of his injury. 

Id., ¶¶ 18-19. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of 

Special Masters.

On July 29, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4 report in which she concedes that 

petitioner “compensation is appropriate” in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4 Report at 5. 

Specifically, respondent “concludes that petitioner suffered a non-Table injury of SIRVA 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to 

post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 

note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2006).
2

and that the preponderance of the medical evidence indicates that the injury was 

causally related to the Tdap vaccination he received on April 16, 2014.” Id.

Furthermore, respondent agrees that petitioner has “met the statutory requirements by 

suffering the condition for more than six months.” Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation.

s/Denise K. Vowell

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 8 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 8

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor 
      Relations Board relating to representation case procedures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2015

  Mr. Alexander (for himself, Mr. Enzi, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Blunt, Mr. 
Cornyn, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Isakson, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Burr, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 
  Risch, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Coats, Mr. Scott, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Kirk, Mr. 
Barrasso, Mr. Thune, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Corker, Mr. Flake, Mr. 
Cassidy, Mr. Heller, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Shelby, Ms. Collins, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
Cotton, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Vitter, Mr. McCain, Mr. Hoeven, 
   Mr. Moran, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Graham, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Grassley, Mr. 
  Cochran, Mr. Gardner, Mrs. Ernst, Mr. Daines, Mrs. Fischer, and Mr. 
 Cruz) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 
and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor 
      Relations Board relating to representation case procedures.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Labor Relations Board relating to 
representation case procedures (published at 79 Fed. Reg. 74308 
(December 15, 2014)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19317]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15283; MISSISSIPPI Disaster Number MS-00102 
Declaration of Economic Injury]


Administrative Declaration of an Economic Injury Disaster for the 
State of Mississippi

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Mississippi, dated September 1, 2017.

DATES: Issued on 09/01/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/01/2018.

ADDRESS: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    Incident: City of Vicksburg's Main Waterline Rupture.
    Incident Period: 05/17/2017 through 05/24/2017.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Warren
Contiguous Counties:
    Mississippi: Claiborne, Hinds, Issaquena, Yazoo
    Louisiana: East Carroll, Madison, Tensas

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      3.215
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere..      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 152830.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Mississippi, 
Louisiana.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

    Dated: September 1, 2017.
Linda E. McMahon,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-19317 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Lonni L. Dieck, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ohio Phase-In-Recovery Funding LLC (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by Ohio Power Company, as Servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013 between Ohio Phase-In-Recovery Funding LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer, in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and the related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





6. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee.





Date: March 23, 2018/s/ Lonni L. DieckName:  Lonni L. DieckTitle: Treasurer and Senior Officer in Charge of theServicing Function, Ohio Power Company, as Servicer
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 267 

Expressing support for the continuation of the Federal Perkins Loan 

program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. CASEY, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. 

KAINE, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. REED, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. BROWN, Mrs. 

FEINSTEIN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. KIRK, Mr. COONS, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mrs. 

BOXER, Mr. HEINRICH, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. PETERS, Mrs. MURRAY, and 

Mr. WARNER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the continuation of the Federal 

Perkins Loan program. 

Whereas the Federal Perkins Loan program is the longest 

running Federal student loan program in the United 

States, created in 1958 as the National Defense Student 

Loan Program and later called the National Direct Loan 

Program; 

Whereas Federal Perkins loans are efficient, need-based, lowinterest loans that serve 500,000 low-income college students with high need at approximately 1,500 colleges and 

universities each year; 


ebenthall on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 267 IS 

Whereas Federal Perkins loans have favorable terms for students, including— 

(1) interest is not charged while a student is in 

school; 

(2) the interest rate is low and fixed; and 

(3) a borrower may have all or part of a Federal 

Perkins loans cancelled if the borrower undertakes certain public service jobs for a period of 1 to 5 years; 

Whereas participating colleges and universities share the risk 

of the Federal Perkins Loan Program because the colleges and universities provide a 1⁄3 match to Federal capital contributions and loans are made using funds repaid 

by previous borrowers; 

Whereas Federal Perkins loans feature the human touch of 

campus-based servicing, which allows on-campus administrators to provide Federal Perkins borrowers with 1-on1 service; 

Whereas Federal Perkins loans have made higher education 

possible for millions of people of the United States; and 

Whereas without Federal Perkins loans, thousands of people 

in the United States will lose the chance at a higher education and a better life: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate strongly supports the con2 tinuation of the Federal Perkins Loan program in order 

3 to provide educational opportunities to future generations 

4 of students who need low-cost financing to make their 

5 dreams of higher education possible. 

Æ 


ebenthall on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS