alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy (DoN) announces the availability of the inventions listed below, assigned to the United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Navy, for domestic and foreign licensing by the Department of the Navy.

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for copies of the patents cited should be directed to Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001, Email                         *Christopher.Monsey@navy.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following patents are available for licensing: Patent No. 9,685,231 (Navy Case No. 103033): IRREPRODUCIBLE AND RE-EMERGENT UNIQUE STRUCTURE OR PATTERN IDENTIFIER MANUFACTURING AND DETECTION METHOD, SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS//Patent No. 9,684,025 (Navy Case No. 103032): DUT CONTINUITY TEST WITH ONLY DIGITAL IO STRUCTURES APPARATUS AND METHODS ASSOCIATED THEREOF//Patent No. 9,683,514 (Navy Case No. 102781): HIGH EFFICIENCY COMBUSTOR AND CLOSED-CYCLE HEAT ENGINE INTERFACE//Patent No. 9,669,539 (Navy Case No. 103113): MAGNETIC DRILL SYSTEM//and Patent No. 9,680,561 (Navy Case No. 200235): SITUATIONAL AWARENESS AND POSITION INFORMATION FOR SATELLITE COMMUNICATION TERMINALS.

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

Dated: August 30, 2017.

A.M. Nichols,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-18915 Filed 9-5-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 162 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 162

    Supporting the goals and ideals of Alcohol Responsibility Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2015

   Ms. Heitkamp (for herself and Mr. Heller) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Supporting the goals and ideals of Alcohol Responsibility Month.

Whereas, in 2013, an estimated 10,076 people were killed in the United States in 
        drunk driving crashes involving a driver with a blood alcohol content of 
        .08 or greater, impacting countless family members, friends, and 
        communities;
Whereas, in 2013, 1 person died in a drunk driving crash every 52 minutes, on 
        average;
Whereas, in 2013, approximately 8,700,000 people of the United States between 
        the ages of 12 and 20, or nearly 23 percent of the age group for whom 
        alcohol consumption is illegal, reported consuming alcohol during the 
        preceding 30 days;
Whereas research shows that a lifetime of conversations between parents and 
        their children about alcohol, beginning at an early age, can help 
        prevent underage drinking and alcohol abuse;
Whereas the potential danger for young people to be involved in alcohol-related 
        crashes escalates during prom and graduation season;
Whereas many State attorneys general are launching underage drinking prevention 
        messages and programs in their States and communities; and
Whereas April has been dedicated to alcohol awareness for the last 28 years, and 
        more than awareness is needed to further reduce drunk driving and 
        underage drinking: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) declares April to be Alcohol Responsibility Month and 
        supports the goal of encouraging responsible decision-making 
        regarding beverage alcohol;
            (2) encourages parents to be responsible role models and to 
        have ongoing conversations with their children throughout their 
        childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood about the dangers 
        of alcohol abuse;
            (3) condemns the pervasiveness of alcohol-impaired driving 
        and resulting tragedies; and
            (4) promotes the responsible consumption of alcohol by 
        adults in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7059

DEMAR WORRELL,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

ANTHONY VELASQUEZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SERGEANT SPARKS; SERGEANT WINN,

 Defendants – Appellees,

and

WAYNE COUNTY JAIL,

 Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, 

Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03092-D)

Submitted: November 23, 2015 Decided: February 25, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Demar Worrell, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart, 

SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART PA, New Bern, North 

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Demar Worrell appeals the district court’s orders granting 

summary judgment to defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) 

complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Worrell v. Sergeant 

Sparks, No. 5:14-ct-03092-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2015 & June 11, 

2015). We deny Worrell’s motion for medical records and 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-35.4
(logo) LNR
Partners, LLC


ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC


The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the
"Special Servicer"), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and
Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule II hereto, hereby
certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule II hereto, as of the
date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an
authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity,
as follows:

1. A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the
   period commencing on January 1, 2013 and ending on December 31, 2013 (or any
   other shorter period set forth on Schedule II hereto) (the "Reporting
   Period"), and of the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and
   Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable
   servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing
   Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


LNR PARTNERS, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company

By: /s/ Job Warshaw
        Job Warshaw
        President


Dated: February 28, 2014


1601 Washington Avenue * Suite 700 * Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164
Telephone: (305) 695-5600 * Fax: (305) 695-5601


(page)


Schedule II

Transaction                                   Certificate Restrictions (if any)
JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities
Trust 2013-C12, Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2013-C12
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Raymond A. August, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Benefitfocus, Inc. (the “registrant”), and Jonathon E. Dussault, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) of the registrant, each hereby certifies that, to the best of their knowledge: 

1.The registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2017, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by the Report and results of operations of the registrant for the periods covered by the Report. 

Date: March 16, 2018

 

/s/ Raymond A. August                             

Raymond A. August

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal executive officer)

 

/s/ Jonathon E. Dussault

Jonathon E. Dussault

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal financial and accounting officer)
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0622

_____________________________ S HONTAI L. D UNLAP , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court fo r Duval County

. Tatiana Salvador , Judge

. June 5, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , J AY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

______ _______________________2 Shontai L. Dunlap, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
exhibit10_3.htm


 


Exhibit 10.3


 


Hines Global REIT, Inc.


Schedule of Omitted Agreements







The purchase agreements set forth below have not been filed as exhibits to this Current Report on Form 8-K pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, because they are substantially the same as the Form of Preliminary Agreement for the Sale of the Perpetual Usufruct Right to a Land and the Ownership Right to a Building, which has been filed as Exhibit 10.2 to this Current Report on Form 8-K:







Preliminary Agreement for the Sale of the Perpetual Usufruct Right to a Land and the Ownership Right to a Building, dated as of December 22, 2011, by and between ProLogis Poland XXXIX sp. z o.o. (Purchase of Prologis Park Warsaw I; purchase price of  €31.5 million Euro approximately USD $41.3 million based on a rate of $1.3091 per Euro as of the contract date)







Preliminary Agreement for the Sale of the Perpetual Usufruct Right to a Land and the Ownership Right to a Building, dated as of December 22, 2011, by and between ProLogis Poland XCII sp. z o.o. (Purchase of ProLogis Park Warsaw III; purchase price of  €18.7 million Euro approximately USD $24.5 million based on a rate of $1.3091 per Euro as of the contract date)


 


Preliminary Agreement for the Sale of the Perpetual Usufruct Right to a Land and the Ownership Right to a Building, dated as of December 22, 2011, by and between ProLogis Poland XXI sp. z o.o. and ProLogis Poland XXXIX sp. z o.o. (Purchase of ProLogis Park Bedzin I; purchase price of €28.9 million Euro approximately USD $37.8 million based on a rate of $1.3091 per Euro as of the contract date)


 


Preliminary Agreement for the Sale of the Perpetual Usufruct Right to a Land and the Ownership Right to a Building, dated as of December 22, 2011, by and between ProLogis Poland XXIX sp. z o.o. (Purchase of ProLogis Park Sosnowiec; purchase price of €19.9 million Euro approximately USD $26.1 million based on a rate of $1.3091 per Euro as of the contract date)
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Sumito Mulchandani, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

 

| Dated March 21, 2017 |   |                                                                                                                       |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                                                                                       |
|                      |   | /s/  Sumito   Mulchandani                                                                                             |
|                      |   | Sumito MulchandaniAssistant Treasurer of Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2013-B |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charles BUCKNER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-2272-cr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 29, 2008.

Jeremiah Donovan, Old Saybrook, CT, for Appellant.

*343Michael J. Garcia, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Nicholas S. Goldin, Celeste L. Koeleveld, Assistant United States Attorneys, Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: Hon. RICHARD J. CARDAMONE, Hon. ROBERT D. SACK and Hon. ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-appellant Charles Buckner pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He appeals from his sentence of fifty-one months’ imprisonment, three years of supervised release, a $1000 fine and a $100 mandatory assessment. We assume the parties’ and counsel’s familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case.

Buckner challenges the district court’s factual finding, based on the presentence report, that his 1999 juvenile convictions, for criminal sale of a controlled substance, were “unrelated.” The facts and conclusions contained in that report were not challenged by the defendant and were adopted by the district court.

“If a defendant fails to challenge factual matters contained in the presentence report at the time of sentencing, the defendant waives the right to contest them on appeal.” *United States v. Rizzo,*349 F.3d 94, 99 (2d Cir.2003); *see also United States v. Feigenbaum,*962 F.2d 230, 233 (2d Cir.1992). Because appellant failed to raise the factual issue of “relatedness” before the district court, we deem it waived and decline to consider it here.

Buckner also argues that his 1999 convictions should have been classified as “juvenile status offenses,” and therefore not considered in applying the Guidelines, and that the district court erred in relying on facts contained in the presentence report and arrest reports. *See Shepard v. United States,*544 U.S. 13, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005). These arguments also were not raised before the district court. We review issues not raised in the district court “only upon a showing that the court committed plain error.” *United States v. Miller,*263 F.3d 1, 4 (2d Cir.2001).

We conclude that the district court did not commit plain error in this regard. Even if it was error, which we doubt, it was not “plainly” so. *See United States v. Ward,*71 F.3d 262, 263 (7th Cir.1995) (“The obvious meaning [of juvenile status offenses] is conduct that would be lawful for an adult and is unlawful solely by virtue of the defendant’s juvenile status, such as the purchase of liquor or cigarettes ....”) (citation omitted).

We have considered Buckner’s other assertions of error and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

h 0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

147401

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147401

COA: 311876

Macomb CC: 1994

- 002418

- FC

CHRISTOPHER L. TULL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Macomb Circuit Court for

reissuance of the defendant’s judgment of conviction and sentence. The record makes

clear that the failure to perfect an appeal of right was solely the fault of the defendant’s

trial counsel, who did not fulfill his promise in open court to file the necessary paperwor k

to begin the appellate process. Accordingly, the defendant was deprived of his appeal of

right as a result of constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel. See Roe v Flores

Ortega

, 528 US 470, 477; 120 S Ct 1029; 145 L Ed 2d 985 (2000); Peguero v United

States, 526 US 23, 28; 119 S Ct 961; 143 L Ed 2d 18 (1999).

We further ORDER the Macomb Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative

Order 2003

- 03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint

counsel to represent the defendant on appeal.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Gregory B. Kenny, certify that:



|1) | I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of General Cable Corporation; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: March 4, 2013                  
|                                     
|/s/ Gregory B. Kenny                 
|Gregory B. Kenny                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
---

Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of OrthoLogic Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of John M. Holliman, III, Executive Chairman and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Les
M. Taeger, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: August 12, 2009








/s/ John M. Holliman, III


John M. Holliman, III


Executive Chairman


(Principal Executive Officer)








/s/ Les M. Taeger


Les M. Taeger


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to OrthoLogic Corp. and will be retained by OrthoLogic Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SHONTRELL HIGGS
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3876

[ July 22, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Elizabeth A. Scherer , Judge; L.T. Case No. 19

- 004576CF10A

.

Alfred J. Fluehr of Francis Alexander, LLC, Media, PA, and Michael D. Walsh of Law Offices of Michael Walsh, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J

. Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See James v. State, 886 So

. 2d 1032 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2004);

State v. Sion

, 942 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3 d DCA 2006).

L EVINE
, C.J.

, K UNTZ

, J

., and S HEPHERD
, C AROLINE

, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.