alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 225 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 225

Honoring the National Association of Women Business Owners on its 40th 
                              anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2015

   Mr. Vitter (for himself, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Risch, Mr. Coons, Ms. 
 Ayotte, Ms. Hirono, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Peters, 
   Mr. Gardner, Mr. Markey, Mrs. Ernst, and Mr. Enzi) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

                             July 28, 2015

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the National Association of Women Business Owners on its 40th 
                              anniversary.

Whereas women-owned businesses are one of the fastest-growing segments of the 
        United States economy;
Whereas 13,600,000 firms are 50 percent or more owned by women, and these 
        businesses employ nearly 15,900,000 people and generate 
        $2,700,000,000,000 in revenue as of 2013;
Whereas empowering more women entrepreneurs and business owners is important to 
        the economic future of the United States;
Whereas the National Association of Women Business Owners (NAWBO) was 
        established in 1975 by a group of like-minded businesswomen to serve as 
        the collective voice of women business owners across the country and 
        advocate on behalf of their entrepreneurial interests;
Whereas NAWBO's roots are in public policy, and NAWBO played an integral role in 
        the passage of the Women's Business Ownership Act of 1988 (Public Law 
        100-533; 102 Stat. 2689);
Whereas NAWBO remains focused on collaborating to create a business-friendly 
        environment at the Federal, State, and local levels to enable women to 
        start and grow their businesses and create jobs; and
Whereas NAWBO represents a diverse universe of women business owners across an 
        array of sectors in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate commends the National Association of 
Women Business Owners for its tireless efforts and decades of support 
of women entrepreneurs and business owners and congratulates the 
National Association of Women Business Owners on its 40th anniversary.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function


of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)









SERVICER CERTIFICATION






I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2013-A (the “Exchange Act Periodic Reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;




4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association




Date:     June 27, 2014




By:/s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
Order entered May 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00687-CR

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DUCHARME, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-80054-2018

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

On January 24, 2019, we abated this appeal and ordered the trial court to hold a hearing 

to determine why appellant’s brief, initially due November 28, 2018, had not been filed. On 

April 30, 2019, we received the trial court’s findings of fact and order from the February 1, 2019 

hearing.

We ADOPT the trial court’s findings that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal and 

that appointed counsel Lara E. Bracamonte has not abandoned the appeal. The trial court 

recommended that counsel be given “an additional 30 days to file the brief,” and “directed that 

the brief be filed . . . no later than March 1, 2019.” The trial court signed the order on April 30, 
2019. To date, no brief has been filed and we have had no communication from Ms. 

Bracamonte. 

We ORDER appointed counsel Lara E. Bracamonte to file appellant’s brief BY 5:00 

P.M. ON MAY 13, 2019. Ms. Bracamonte is cautioned that the Court will not entertain any 

further motions from her for any extensions of time in this case. If Ms. Bracamonte does not file 

a brief by 5:00 p.m. on May 13, 2019, the Court will initiate contempt proceedings against her

for the failure and refusal to obey the Court’s order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(4). The Court 

may also take such other actions as may be appropriate, including removing Ms. Bracamonte 

from the appeal or filing a grievance against her and referring this matter to the State Bar of 

Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline for further proceedings.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Angela Tucker, 

Presiding Judge, 199th Judicial District Court; Lara E. Bracamonte; to the Collin County District 

Attorney; and to Christopher Michael Ducharme, TDCJ#02202213, Stevenson Unit, 1525 FM 

766, Cuero, TX 77954.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
February 2 , 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EUGENE M. HARTIS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00882

- CV V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , that the appellant pay all costs expended in this

app eal, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Clifford Lee GRAYSON, Jr., Appellant.

No. 07-1660.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 3, 2008.

Filed: Feb. 1, 2008.

Christopher D. Plumlee, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Smith, AR, James Blair Pierce, Fayetteville, AR, Omar F. Greene II, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Appellee.

Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal of his 41-month prison sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, Clifford Lee Gray-son, Jr. (Grayson) argues (1) the district court1 incorrectly calculated the Guidelines range by assessing criminal history points for Grayson’s August 2005 conviction for failing to surrender; (2) the case should be remanded for resentencing because the court conflated its departure analysis with its variance analysis; and (3) the presumption of reasonableness this court affords to a within-Guidelines-range sentence is improper.

We do not need to reach the first issue raised by Grayson, because even excluding the three criminal-history points assessed for Grayson’s failure-to-surrender conviction, Grayson had 13 other erimin’al-history points, all properly assessed. Thus, Gray-son still has a Category VI criminal history and the same Guidelines sentencing range.2

We further conclude any error the court may have committed in conducting its departure and variance analysis is harmless because Grayson’s within-Guidelines-range sentence is presumptively reasonable, *see United States v. Miller,*479 F.3d 984, 986-88 (8th Cir.2007) (holding that a district court’s conflation of departure and variance analyses was error, but finding it harmless error because the sentence was not unreasonable), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 869, 169 L.Ed.2d 736 (2008); *United States v. Denton,*434 F.3d 1104, 1113 (8th Cir.2006) (stating a within-Guidelines-range sentence is presumptively reasonable), and there is no indication the court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or misapplied the factors, *see United States v. Haack,*403 F.3d 997, 1003-04 (8th Cir.2005).

Finally, Grayson’s last argument is without merit because the Supreme Court has approved the appellate presumption of reasonableness this court affords to within-Guidelines-range sentences. *See Rita v. United States,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462-68, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007) (al*913lowing appellate presumption of reasonableness).

We affirm.

1

. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.

2

. Grayson was sentenced under the 2006 version of the Guidelines Manual. We express no opinion as to what effect, if any, the amendments to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2, effective November 1, 2007, would have upon the analysis of this issue.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 25, 2013

h0617

Order 

Clerk

June 25, 2013

145976 & (30)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145976

COA: 309105

Wayne CC: 07-021541-FC;

ISIAH MEADE, 07-021542-FC

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED.
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2021_4_20_7_57" style="width: 95%;"><caption><span class="tableTitle">Chart 1. Percentage of workers with access to sick leave, by establishment size, private industry, March 2020</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; min-width: 80px;" rowspan="1" scope="col">Establishment size</th>
<th scope="col">Access to sick leave (all workers = 100 percent)</th>
<th scope="col">Confidence interval</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>1 to 49 workers</p>
</th>
<td>66</td>
<td>2.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>50 to 99 workers</p>
</th>
<td>74</td>
<td>4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>100 to 499 workers</p>
</th>
<td>82</td>
<td>2.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>500 or more workers</p>
</th>
<td>88</td>
<td>3.9</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2021_4_20_7_57_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="3">
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Compensation Survey.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p></p>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XF661

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meetings of the North Pacific Fishery Management Council Ecosystem Committee.

# SUMMARY:

                        The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Ecosystem Committee will meet in Seatte, WA. The meeting will be available via web delivery and                               ( print page 42544)                            teleconference. Web URL and teleconference line will be provided on the meeting agenda.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on September 22, 2017, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Pacific Time (PST).

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Seattle, WA, USA.

*Council address:*                         North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steve MacLean, Council staff, phone: (907) 271-2809.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The purpose of the Ecosystem Committee meeting is to review the draft Bering Sea Fishery Ecosystem Plan being developed by Council committee. Resources will be available on the Council's Ecosystem Committee Web page at                     *https://www.npfmc.org/​committees/​ecosystem-committee/​.*

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Shannon Gleason at (907) 271-2809 at least 7 working days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: September 5, 2017.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2017-19058 Filed 9-7-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Letter Agreement. dated as of September 1, 2010



 Exhibit 10.2.1 

 
  
 



 
  
  
 September 21, 2011 
  

John, 
 As per our conversation regarding Work
Order # PES-20100901-LA effective as of September 1, 2010 and any associated Amendments, I have attached the delivery schedule from Enerflow. Of the additional fleet, (8 additional 2,500 HHP Triplex pumps), they will be delivered after our
October 15, 2011 start date and will be worked in to the operational schedule as we each agree. We are requesting that you allow Platinum Energy Solutions, Inc. to replace those 8 pumps with our pumps from United Engine until the Enerflow fleet
is delivered. This should be approximately 30 days from October 15. 
 If this is acceptable, please acknowledge below and fax or scan this
back to me as we are going out for financing and this work order is very important to our this process. This can only be changed by written approval. 
  

	
	Thank you in advance,
	
	/s/ Charlie Moncla
	 Charlie Moncla


  

	
	Acknowledged
	
	/s/ John Perry
	 John Perry

	Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.

 Platinum Energy Solutions, Inc. 
 2100 West Loop 
 Suite 1601 
 Houston, Texas 77022 
 Office: 713.622.7731 

Fax: 832.353.7431 

www.PlatinumEnergySolutions.com
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0403 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANDRE JAMES ANTHONY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 13, 2024 within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 5 2024

02/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0403
#### Shanel Ann STASZ, petitioner, v. Rosendo GONZALEZ, Trustee.

No. 09-11216.

Oct. 4, 2010.

Case below, 348 Fed.Appx. 233.

*1059Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO CONTINUING 

JUDICIAL EDUCATION BOARD OF 

JUDGES

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 904

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2022, the Honorable Albert H. Masland, 

Cumberland County, is hereby appointed to the Continuing Judicial Education Board of 

Judges for a term expiring December 31, 2024.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Pierric Senay, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2013-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association.



Date: March 18, 2016



| | By: | /s/ Pierric Senay                                            
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Pierric Senay                                          
| |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### Lu SORO (doing business as Citigroup), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITIGROUP, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2007-1561.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 11, 2007.

Lu Soro, pro se.

Before RADER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

*263PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

Lu Soro submits a response and an amended response to the court’s September 27, 2007 order. Soro moves for oral argument. Citigroup responds.

Soro appeals a decision issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissing his case. Soro’s district court complaint indicated that he sought review of a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision. This court’s jurisdiction over appeals of district court decisions is limited primarily to cases involving patents and suits against the United States not exceeding $10,000. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1), (2). Because it appeared that this court lacked jurisdiction over Soro’s appeal, on September 27 the court stated that it would transfer the appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit absent a response from the parties.

Soro responds to the September 27 order. He requests that this court “take jurisdiction over this appeal” but does not allege that this court, rather than the Eleventh Circuit, has jurisdiction over this case. Citigroup contends that pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121 this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. The court determines that jurisdiction over this case lies in the regional circuit, in this case the Eleventh Circuit. *See Williams v. Dep’t of the Army,*715 F.2d 1485, 1490 n. 5 (Fed. Cir.1983). Thus, the case is transferred to the Eleventh Circuit.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This case and Soro’s motion for oral argument are transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.