alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 213 

Designating October 30, 2015, as a national day of remembrance for nuclear 

weapons program workers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2015 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. CORKER, Mr. MCCONNELL, 

Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. BROWN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. REID, Mr. UDALL, Ms. 

MURKOWSKI, and Ms. CANTWELL) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2015 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 30, 2015, as a national day of 

remembrance for nuclear weapons program workers. 

Whereas, since World War II, hundreds of thousands of men 

and women, including uranium miners, millers, and haulers, have served the United States by building nuclear 

weapons for the defense of the United States; 

Whereas dedicated workers paid a high price for developing 

a nuclear weapons program at the service, and for the 

benefit of, the United States, including by developing disabling or fatal illnesses; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

SRES 213 ATS 

Whereas the Senate recognized the contributions, services, 

and sacrifices that those patriotic men and women made 

for the defense of the United States in— 

(1) Senate Resolution 151, 111th Congress, agreed 

to May 20, 2009; 

(2) Senate Resolution 653, 111th Congress, agreed 

to September 28, 2010; 

(3) Senate Resolution 275, 112th Congress, agreed 

to September 26, 2011; 

(4) Senate Resolution 519, 112th Congress, agreed 

to August 1, 2012; 

(5) Senate Resolution 164, 113th Congress, agreed 

to September 18, 2013; and 

(6) Senate Resolution 417, 113th Congress, agreed 

to July 9, 2014; 

Whereas a national day of remembrance time capsule has 

been crossing the United States, collecting stories and artifacts of nuclear weapons program workers relating to 

the nuclear defense era of the United States, and a remembrance quilt has been constructed to memorialize the 

contribution of those workers; 

Whereas the stories and artifacts reflected in the time capsule and the remembrance quilt reinforce the importance 

of recognizing nuclear weapons program workers; and 

Whereas those patriotic men and women deserve to be recognized for the contributions, services, and sacrifices they 

made for the defense of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 30, 2015, as a national 

3 day of remembrance for the nuclear weapons promstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

SRES 213 ATS 

1 gram and uranium enrichment workers of the 

2 United States, including the uranium miners, mil3 lers, and haulers; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to support and participate in appropriate cere6 monies, programs, and other activities to commemo7 rate October 30, 2015, as a national day of remem8 brance for past and present workers in the nuclear 

9 weapons program of the United States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Guarantee, dated December 8, 2011, relating to the New Secured Notes.



 Exhibit 4.22 
 GUARANTEE 
 Warner Music Group Corp. (the “Guarantor”) hereby
unconditionally guarantees WMG Acquisition Corp.’s 9.50% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 issued pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2011, by and among WM Finance Corp., a Delaware corporation, as issuer (the “Initial
Issuer”), the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, as amended by the Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2011, by and among WMG Acquisition Corp., as successor by merger to the
Initial Issuer and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (such indenture, as the same may be amended, restated or supplemented from time to time, the “Indenture”), to the extent set forth in and in accordance with the
Indenture. 
 The obligations of the Guarantor pursuant to this Guarantee and the Indenture, are expressly set forth in Article
Eleven of the Indenture, and reference is hereby made to the Indenture for the precise terms and limitations of this Guarantee. 

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Indenture. 

[Signatures on Following Pages] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Warner Music Group Corp. has caused this Guarantee to be signed by a
duly authorized officer. 
 DATED: December 8, 2011 

 

			
	WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul Robinson

	Name:	 	Paul Robinson
	Title:	 	EVP & General Counsel


 [Signature Page to the Warner Music Group Guarantee of the WMG New Secured Notes]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FIANNCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 399,857
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,847,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                           581,125
<INVENTORY>                                            403,114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     3,337,515
<PP&E>                                               4,095,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                         995,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      38,368,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                6,604,992
<BONDS>                                              7,292,911
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                 10
<COMMON>                                                12,203
<OTHER-SE>                                           6,693,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        38,368,691
<SALES>                                              3,241,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     8,877,656
<CGS>                                                2,516,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,548,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3,318,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       237,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     516,216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,530,374)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,530,374)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,530,374)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
INTERIM STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FROM 10QSB FOR
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,066,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  229,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,342,611
<PP&E>                                         342,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                 172,428
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,520,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,177,712
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       127,238
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,216,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,520,950
<SALES>                                      1,100,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,135
<CGS>                                          942,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,822
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,572,864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,265,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,265,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,265,812)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.004)


</TABLE>
#### Ralph T. BYRD, petitioner, v. WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, L.L.P., et al.

No. 09-1421.

Oct. 4, 2010.

Case below, 187 Md.App. 719; 187 Md. App. 734.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jeffrey A. Green, Chief Executive Officer, DATATRAK International, Inc., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DATATRAK International, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005        /s/ Jeffrey A. Green       Jeffrey A. Green,   President and Chief Executive   Officer
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

** **

I, William J. Shope,do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation,and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under theSale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2013 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust2013-A, as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)          Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has beenmade under my supervision.

 

(ii)         Tothe best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreementin all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand as of March 11, 2016.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19126]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15291 and #15292; Texas Disaster Number TX-
00488]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Texas

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Texas (FEMA-4332-
DR), dated 09/04/2017.
    Incident: Hurricane Harvey.
    Incident Period: 08/23/2017 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 09/04/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/03/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/04/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/04/2017, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Aransas, Brazoria, Calhoun, Chambers, Colorado, 
Fayette, Fort Bend, Galveston, Goliad, Hardin, Harris, Jackson, Jasper, 
Jefferson, Liberty, Matagorda, Montgomery, Newton, Nueces, Orange, 
Polk, San Jacinto, San Patricio, Tyler, Victoria, Walker, Waller, 
Wharton
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 152918 
and for economic injury is 152920.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)


James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-19126 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  This Certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly
         Report of Today's Man, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
         ended November 2, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and is given solely for
         the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
         as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  To the best of their knowledge, the undersigned, in their
         respective capacities as set forth below, hereby certify that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                /s/ Bruce Weitz                      Date: December 22, 2002
         --------------------------------
         Bruce Weitz,
         Chief Executive Officer

                /s/ Frank E. Johnson                 Date: December 22, 2002
         ------------------------------
         Frank E. Johnson,
         Chief Financial Officer











                                       24
1

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2623

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Kenneth Jay Still, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 18, 2009

Filed: December 29, 2009

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Kenneth Still challenges the 24-month prison

term the district court1

 imposed after revoking his supervised release. Still argues that

the court erred in revoking his supervised release, that his sentence is unreasonable,

and that his counsel was ineffective. Still’s counsel has moved to withdraw, and Still

has filed a pro se motion for reconsideration of this court’s earlier denial of his motion

for appointment of new counsel.
-2-

Upon careful review, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion

in revoking Still’s supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (court may revoke

supervised release if it finds by preponderance of evidence that defendant violated

conditions of supervised release); United States v. Edwards, 400 F.3d 591, 592 (8th

Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (“Given [defendant’s] admission of the violation, we find no

clear error in the district court’s findings of fact supporting the revocation and no

abuse of discretion in the decision to revoke.”). Furthermore, we conclude that the

revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824,

825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are reviewed for

unreasonableness in accordance with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)).

The sentence is within the statutory limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), and the district

court adequately considered the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e) (before revoking supervised release and imposing sentence, court must

consider specified factors in § 3553(a), including § 3553(a)(1) (nature and

circumstances of offense and history and characteristics of defendant)); United States

v. Franklin, 397 F.3d 604, 606-07 (8th Cir. 2005) (court need only consider relevant

matters, and need not make specific findings on each § 3553(a) factor); see also

United States v. Lewis, 519 F.3d 822, 824-25 (8th Cir. 2008) (district courts need not

consider effect of prior revocation prison sentences).

Last, we decline to consider Still’s ineffective-assistance claim. See United

States v. Hughes, 330 F.3d 1068, 1069 (8th Cir. 2003) (ineffective-assistance claim

is more properly reviewed in habeas proceedings).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, deny Still’s pending

motion, and affirm.

______________________________
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### APR 22 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

GILBERT DEAN DAVIS,

Petitioner-Appellant,
v. JUSTINE JONES,

Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-6152 (W. Dist. of Oklahoma) (D.C. No. CIV-95-1845-W)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, PORFILIO, and MURPHY , Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and the appellate record , this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument wouldnot be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. Se e Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered sub mitted without oral argument.-2-

This matter is before the court on Petitioner Gilbe rt Dean Davis’ application for a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habe as corpus. Because Mr. Davis has not made a “substantial showing of the denial o f a constitutional right,” and this petition constitutes an abuse of the writ, we deny his application and dismiss the appeal. **See** Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1 996, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Mr. Davis filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus with the district court contending that he was denied his Sixth Amendment r ight to effective assistance of counsel and his due process right to a post-exam ination competency hearing. The magistrate judge reviewed Mr. Davis’ petition and recommended that it be dismissed for abuse of the writ. **See** Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases 9(b). The district court agreed with the magistrate judge and dismissed Mr. Davis’ petition April 15, 1996. We have reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the district court’s order, Petitioner’s application fo r a certificate of appealability, and the record before us. We conclude that Petitio ner has failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right for substantially the reasons set forth in the report and recommendation of March 18, 1996.-3-

Accordingly, we DENY Petitioner’s application for a certificate of appea lability and DISMISS the appeal. ENTERED FOR THE COURT,
Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge