alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-2404-000]


SP Sandhills Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
SP Sandhills Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 25, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c1a190e1f1332303532390f292c2c332e281c3a392e3f723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="efa9aabdaca0818386818abc9a9f9f809d9baf898a9d8cc1888099">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: September 5, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19164 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Shawn SULLIVAN; Arrigotti Fine Jewelry; James Walnum, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. DB INVESTMENTS, INC; De Beers S.A.; De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd; De Beers A.G.; Diamond Trading Company; CSO Valuations A.G.; Central Selling Organization; De Beers Centenary A.G. David T. Murray, Appellant at 08-2784 (Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 12(a)) Susan M. Quinn, Appellant at 08-2785 (Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 12(a)) Marvin L. Union; Tim Henning; Neil Freedman; Kylie Luke; William Benjamin Coffey, Jr., Appellants at 08-2798 (Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 12(a)) Aaron Petrus, Appellant at 08-2799 (Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 12(a)) Janet Giddings, Appellant at 08-2818 (Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 12(a)) Frank Ascione; Rosaura Bagolie; Matthew Delong; Sandeep Gopalan; Manoj Kolel-Veetil; Matthew Metz; Anita Pal; Deb K Pal; Jay Pal; Peter Perera; Rangesh K. Shah; Ed McKenna; Thomas Vaughan, Appellants at 08-2819 (Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 12(a)) Kristen Dishman; Margaret Marasco, Appellants at 08-2831 (Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 12(a)) *288James B. Hicks, Appellant at 08-2881 (Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 12(a))

Nos. 08-2784, 08-2785, 08-2798, 08-2799, 08-2818, 08-2819, 08-2831, 08-2881.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Aug. 27, 2010.

Howard B. Becker, Esq., Korein Tillery, St. Louis, MO, Craig C. Corbitt, Esq., Zelle, Hofmann, Voelbel & Mason, Susan G. Kupfer, Glancy, Binkow & Goldberg, Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr., Esq., Berman, De-valerio, Pease, Tabacco, Burt *&*Pucillo, William Bernstein, Esq., Eric B. Fastiff, Esq., Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, Josef D. Cooper, Cooper & Kirkham, San Francisco, CA, John A. Maher, Esq., Summit, NJ, for Appellants.

Jessica Biggio, Matthew P. Hendrick-son, Esq., Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York, NY, Francis Ciani-Dausch, Esq., Tara S. Emory, Esq., Mark J. Sagat, Esq., Steven C. Sunshine, Esq., Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

John J. Pentz, III, Esq., Class Action Fairness Group, Maynard, MA, for David T. Murray.

Present SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing filed by appellees and the answers filed by appellants, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing *en banc*is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion and judgment filed July 13, 2010, is hereby vacated. The Clerk of this Court shall list the above case for rehearing *en banc*at the convenience of the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of
operations filed as a part of the quarterly report on Form 10Q and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such quarterly report of Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000887150
<NAME>                          Charles Clayton
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<CURRENCY>                      US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    APR-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1
<CASH>                           20,053
<SECURITIES>                        253
<RECEIVABLES>                    13,822
<ALLOWANCES>                     (3,067)
<INVENTORY>                      22,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 59,125
<PP&E>                           35,243
<DEPRECIATION>                  (25,882)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   98,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             6,967
<BONDS>                          26,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                            418
<OTHER-SE>                       64,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     98,430
<SALES>                          14,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 15,154
<CGS>                            12,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    12,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  5,770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,461)
<INCOME-TAX>                       (500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,961)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,961)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (0.48)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,550
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     37,408
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          39,321
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            39,035
<LOANS>                                        222,699
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 329,045
<DEPOSITS>                                     288,224
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,433
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,729
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,825
<COMMON>                                         7,932
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 329,045
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,915
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,131
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    83
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,129
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,673
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,811
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,318
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       45
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (6)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,065
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         703
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.35
<LOANS-NON>                                        310
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,094
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   462
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,123
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,368
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       25
<RECOVERIES>                                        20
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,408
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,408
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Ida M. GILMORE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 2007-3188.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 23, 2008.

Ronnie L. Williams, Law Offices of Ronnie L. Williams, of Mobile, AL, argued for petitioner.

Sean B. McNamara, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General; Jeanne E. Davidson, Director; and Donald E. Kinner, Assistant Director.

GAJARSA and DYK, Circuit Judges, and MORAN, Senior District Judge.*

*

 Honorable James B. Moran, Senior District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinios, sitting by designation.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18903]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 2039]


Reorganization and Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 193 Under 
Alternative Site Framework; Pinellas County, Florida

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for `` * * * 
the establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of zones;
    Whereas, Pinellas County, Florida, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 
193, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-50-2016, 
docketed August 2, 2016) for authority to reorganize and expand under 
the ASF with a service area of Pinellas, Hernando and Pasco Counties, 
Florida, in and adjacent to the St. Petersburg Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry, FTZ 193's existing Sites 1, 2 and 3 would be 
categorized as magnet sites, and the zone would have four initial 
usage-driven sites (Sites 4, 5, 6 and 7), with Temporary Site 8 
maintaining its current designation;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (81 FR 52401, August 8, 2016) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize and expand FTZ 193 under the ASF is 
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.13, to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for 
the zone, to an ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would 
terminate authority for Sites 2 and 3 if not activated within five 
years from the month of approval, and to an ASF sunset provision for 
usage-driven sites that would terminate authority for Sites 4, 5, 6 and 
7 if no foreign-status merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs 
purpose within three years from the month of approval.

    Dated: August 25, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations performing the non-
exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement & Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-18903 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 7, 2016 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-16-00734-CV ESTATE OF FRANCISCO J. MARTINEZ; AL MA MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FRANCISCO J. MARTINEZ, DECEASED; AS NEXT FRIEND OF M.M., C.M., B.M., L.M., R.M., AND F.M., MINORS, ET AL., Appellants V. AMERIPIPE SUPPLY, INC. AND AJK SUPPLY, INC., Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-02608-B



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellants’ brief was due September 14, 2016. By notice dated September 15, 2016, we notified appellants’ counsel that the time for f iling appellants’ brief had expired and directed appellants to file appellants’ brief and a motion for extension of time to file the brief in compliance with rules 10.1( a) and 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within ten days. We cautioned appellants that if the brief and extension motion were not filed within the time specified the appeal would be dismissed. A ppellants have not filed the brief, an extension motion, or otherwise communicated with the Court regarding the st atus of the brief. Because appellants have failed to file their brief, despite being given more than eighty days to do so and–2– being cautioned that failure to do so would resu lt in dismissal of the appeal, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

160734F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
ESTATE OF FRANCISCO J. MARTINEZ; ALMA MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FRANCISCO J. MARTINEZ, DECEASED; AS NEXT FRIEND OF M.M., C.M., B.M., L.M., R.M., AND F.M., MINORS, ET AL., Appellants
No. 05-16-00734-CV V. AMERIPIPE SUPPLY, INC. AND AJK SUPPLY, INC., Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-02608-B. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellees AMERIPIPE SUPPLY, INC. AND AJK SUPPLY, INC. recover their costs of this appeal from a ppellants ESTATE OF FR ANCISCO J. MARTINEZ; ALMA MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FRANCISCO J. MARTINEZ, DECEASED, and AS NEXT FRIEND OF M.M., C.M., B.M., L.M., R.M., AND F.M., MINOR S; ALFREDO MARTINEZ AND VICTORIA ORTIZ
Judgment entered this 7th day of November, 2016.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. sECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report (the
"Report") of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2013,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur L. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that,



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|By | /s/ Arthur L. Smith     | 
|-- | ----------------------- | 
|   | Arthur L. Smith         | 
|   | President and           | 
|   | Chief Executive Officer | 
|   | April 8, 2015           |
#### Arsen VARDANYAN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney* General, Respondent.

No. 05-70147.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 2007 **.

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Alex Gortinsky, Esq., Law Offices of Alex Gortinsky, Fair Oaks, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Kathryn L. Deangelis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

■ Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2), Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States.

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Arsen Vardanyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b). We review the BIA’s order denying the motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion. *Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Vardanyan’s motion to reconsider. Vardanyan’s motion did not show any error in the BIA’s September 2004 decision nor did it include any pertinent authority to support his argument. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(C); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).

Vardanyan failed to raise his ineffective assistance of counsel claim before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1). We therefore lack jurisdiction to consider this claim.

We lack jurisdiction to review any of the other arguments related to the BIA’s September 2004 decision because Vardanyan did not file a petition for review of that decision. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publi*961cation and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for RBS Commercial Funding Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2013-C15

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of August 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|