alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Nadir ALI, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74425.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007 **.

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Martin Avila Robles, Esq., Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, William C. Erb, Jr., Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Nadir Ali seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellation of *51removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings, *see Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir.2001), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that Ali failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003). We do not consider Ali’s contention regarding moral character, because Ali’s failure to establish hardship is dispositive.

Ali’s contention that the IJ violated his due process rights by disregarding his evidence of hardship is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[T]raditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).

We are not persuaded that Ai’s removal results in the deprivation of his children's rights. *See Cabrerar-Alvarez v. Gonzales,*423 F.3d 1006, 1012-13 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

***

 xhxS disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 31.1**
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION
     I, Steven C. Futrell, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Croghan Bancshares, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrolsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usbyothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrolsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: April 27, 2005 /s/  Steven C. Futrell   Steven C. Futrell, President & CEO      
19
**Exhibit 31.1**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION  I, Steven C. Futrell, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Croghan Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: October 25, 2005   /s/ Steven C. Futrell         Steven C. Futrell, President & CEO
21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,661
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     34,436
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          39,133
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            39,482
<LOANS>                                        232,960
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 336,525
<DEPOSITS>                                     291,952
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,690
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,672
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,796
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 336,525
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,513
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,007
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   314
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,834
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,253
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,570
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,264
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,534
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,319
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.42
<LOANS-NON>                                        403
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,109
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    744
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,518
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      337
<RECOVERIES>                                        99
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,460
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,460
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of Investcorp
Credit Management BDC, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rocco DelGuercio, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



/s/    Rocco DelGuercioName:

Rocco DelGuercioDate:

September 13, 2022
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 260 

Honoring the life and legacy of Calvin G. Moret. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2015 

Mr. VITTER (for himself and Mr. CASSIDY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and legacy of Calvin G. Moret. 

Whereas Calvin G. Moret was born on August 15, 1925, in 

New Orleans, Louisiana; 

Whereas, in 1943, Calvin G. Moret joined the Tuskegee Airmen and completed his advanced training in P–51 Mustangs; 

Whereas the Tuskegee Airmen were the first African-American military airmen; 

Whereas, on November 20, 1944, Calvin G. Moret graduated 

as a Flight Officer as part of class 44–I–SE in the 

Tuskegee Airmen program; 

Whereas, according to the Veterans History Project of the 

Library of Congress, Calvin G. Moret served as a flight 

instructor; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 260 ATS 

Whereas Calvin G. Moret was a recipient of the Congressional Gold Medal, presented in the rotunda of the 

United States Capitol, for his service to the United 

States; 

Whereas Calvin G. Moret was the last surviving Tuskegee 

Airman pilot in Louisiana; 

Whereas Calvin G. Moret contributed oral histories to the collection of the National WWII Museum; 

Whereas, on June 29, 2013, the Urban League of Greater 

New Orleans presented Calvin G. Moret with the Whitney 

M. Young Legacy Award; 

Whereas, in 2014, Calvin G. Moret became the fifth honorary 

member of the Black Pilots of America; and 

Whereas Calvin G. Moret was a distinguished speaker for the 

National WWII Museum at major exhibits, including the 

‘‘Fighting for the Right to Fight: African American Experiences in World War II’’ exhibit: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors the life of Calvin G. Moret, who was 

3 dedicated to serving the community and recording 

4 the experiences of the members of the Tuskegee Air5 men; 

6 (2) recognizes the lasting contributions made by 

7 Calvin G. Moret to World War II educational pro8 gramming and the National WWII Museum; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 260 ATS 

1 (3) requests that the Secretary of the Senate 

2 prepare an official copy of this resolution for presen3 tation to the family of Calvin G. Moret. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 213 

Designating October 30, 2015, as a national day of remembrance for nuclear 

weapons program workers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2015 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. CORKER, Mr. MCCONNELL, 

Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. BROWN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. REID, Mr. UDALL, and 

Ms. MURKOWSKI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 30, 2015, as a national day of 

remembrance for nuclear weapons program workers. 

Whereas, since World War II, hundreds of thousands of men 

and women, including uranium miners, millers, and haulers, have served the United States by building nuclear 

weapons for the defense of the United States; 

Whereas dedicated workers paid a high price for developing 

a nuclear weapons program at the service, and for the 

benefit of, the United States, including by developing disabling or fatal illnesses; 

Whereas the Senate recognized the contributions, services, 

and sacrifices that those patriotic men and women made 

for the defense of the United States in— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 213 IS 

(1) Senate Resolution 151, 111th Congress, agreed 

to May 20, 2009; 

(2) Senate Resolution 653, 111th Congress, agreed 

to September 28, 2010; 

(3) Senate Resolution 275, 112th Congress, agreed 

to September 26, 2011; 

(4) Senate Resolution 519, 112th Congress, agreed 

to August 1, 2012; 

(5) Senate Resolution 164, 113th Congress, agreed 

to September 18, 2013; and 

(6) Senate Resolution 417, 113th Congress, agreed 

to July 9, 2014; 

Whereas a national day of remembrance time capsule has 

been crossing the United States, collecting stories and artifacts of nuclear weapons program workers relating to 

the nuclear defense era of the United States, and a remembrance quilt has been constructed to memorialize the 

contribution of those workers; 

Whereas the stories and artifacts reflected in the time capsule and the remembrance quilt reinforce the importance 

of recognizing nuclear weapons program workers; and 

Whereas those patriotic men and women deserve to be recognized for the contributions, services, and sacrifices they 

made for the defense of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 30, 2015, as a national 

3 day of remembrance for the nuclear weapons pro4 gram and uranium enrichment workers of the 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 213 IS 

1 United States, including the uranium miners, mil2 lers, and haulers; and 

3 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

4 to support and participate in appropriate cere5 monies, programs, and other activities to commemo6 rate October 30, 2015, as a national day of remem7 brance for past and present workers in the nuclear 

8 weapons program of the United States. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation and its
subsidiary.
 /s/ Steven C. Futrell
    
    /s/ Kendall W. RiemanSteven C. Futrell, President and CEO
    
    Kendall W. Rieman, Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer)
    
    (Principal Financial Officer)Date: October 28, 2008
    
    Date: October 28, 2008
 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or
otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Corporation specifically incorporates this
certification by reference. 21
#### Raymond *v.*Singer Manuf’g Co. and others.

*(Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts.*

April 18, *1882.)*

Patent — Spring Catch — Anticipation.

Where the evidence shows that the claim was an invention anticipated, the hill alleging the infringement will be dismissed.

In Equity.

*T. W. Clarke,*for complainant.

*Browne, Holmes & Browne,*for defendants.

Lowell, C. J.

The plaintiff is the owner of patent No. 101,140, granted to Lawyer & Gasten, March 22, 1870, for an improvement in sewing machines, and alleges an infringement by the defendants of the second claim of the patent, relating to a spring catch for keeping the shuttle in place.

After careful and repeated examinations of the evidence, I think the defendants have proved that this part of the invention was-anticipated by James Bolton, in 1867, as alleged in the amended answer.

Bill dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

*Agency:*                     Bureau of Industry and Security.                

*Title:*                     Import, End-User, and Delivery Verification Certificates.                

*Form Number(s):*                     N/A.                

*OMB Control Number:*                     0694-0093.                

*Type of Review:*                     Regular submission.                

*Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*                     1,618.                

*Estimated Number of Respondents:*                     5,874.                

*Estimated Time per Response:*                     15 to 30 minutes.                

*Needs and Uses:*                     This collection of information provides the certification of the overseas importer to the U.S. Government that specific commodities will be imported from the U.S. and will not be reexported, except in accordance with U.S. export regulations.                

*Affected Public:*                     Business or other for-profit organizations.                

*Frequency:*                     On Occasion.                

*Respondent's Obligation:*                     Voluntary.                

                    This information collection request may be viewed at                     *reginfo.gov**http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​*. Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB.                

                    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to                     *OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.*

Sheleen Dumas,

Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2017-18982 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-33-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Guadalupe GARZA-REYES, also known as Mariano Espinoza, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40555

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 30, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*683Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Guadalupe Garza-Reyes raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert.*denied,-U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.