alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11.1



                                ORTHOLOGIC CORP.


       STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER WEIGHTED AVERAGE
                       NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months Ended                Nine Months Ended
                                                               September 30,                     September 30,
                                                         -------------------------         -------------------------
                                                           1996             1995             1996             1995
                                                         --------         --------         --------         --------
<S>                                                      <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Net Income (Loss)                                        $    456         $   (100)        $  2,871         $ (1,668)
                                                         ========         ========         ========         ========

Common shares outstanding at end of period                 25,022           15,088           25,022           15,088

Adjustment to reflect weighted average for
shares issued during the period                                (3)             (50)          (2,335)            (316)

Assuming conversion of stock options and warrants
                                                              782             --              1,072             --
                                                         --------         --------         --------         --------

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding                                                25,801           15,038           23,759           14,772
                                                         ========         ========         ========         ========



Net income (loss) per weighted average number of
common shares outstanding                                $   0.02         $  (0.01)        $   0.12         $  (0.11)
                                                         ========         ========         ========         ========
</TABLE>

(1)      The common  shares  outstanding  have been adjusted for a 2-for-1 stock
         split  in the  form of a 100  percent  common  share  dividend  for all
         periods presented.
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Nathan SHERMAN.

Crim. No. 20578.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

May 3, 1962.

See also 29 F.R.D. 156.

Drew J. T. O’Keefe, U. S. Atty., Carl J. Melone, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Martin Heller, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KRAFT, District Judge.

Before us is the second motion filed by this defendant in this proceeding to suppress evidence. Nathan Sherman was indicted November 22, 1960 for violation of Title 26 U.S.C. §§ 7262 and 7203. His first motion to suppress, filed February 21, 1961, sought the suppression and return of currency. The Government filed an answer to the motion and the Court, after a hearing on June 20, 1961, ordered the return of the currency and suppressed its use as evidence.

Thereafter, the defendant filed the present motion seeking suppression of some oral statements or admissions, possibly of incriminatory nature, which he made to the arresting officers. Hearing was had on this motion and the transcript of the testimony has been lodged.

After careful consideration, we have concluded that decision at this point upon the admissibility at trial of *some of the defendant’s oral statements*to the arresting officers would be premature and would make “for truncated presentation of the issue of admissibility, because the legality of the search1 too often cannot *365truly be determined until the evidence at the trial has brought all circumstances to light.” Di Bella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121, 129, 82 S.Ct. 654 (1962). We think, too, that interim determinations on such questions of admissibility too frequently tend to make for delay, since, upon call of the case for trial, a continuance is inevitable if a motion to suppress such evidence is still pending before a judge other than the judge to whom the case is assigned for trial. In these circumstances we deem it better practice to reserve until defendant’s trial any final ruling on the pending motion to suppress defendant’s oral statements or admissions.

Order

Now, May 3rd, 1962, it is ordered that determination of defendant’s motion to suppress certain oral statements or admissions be and it is reserved to the judge presiding at defendant’s trial upon this indictment.

The requests and briefs of counsel shall be lodged with the Clerk meanwhile.

1

. And, in this instance, of the arrest.
|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |
| Citibank, N.A.                        | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware |
| As ACOLT Indenture Trustee            | As ACOLT Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Kristen Driscoll     | Attn:  Mark DiGiacomo |
| 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor | 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200 |
| New York, NY 10013                    | Wilmington, DE 19805-1266 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas |
|   | Attn:  Corporate Trust & Agency Group - |
|   | Structured Finance Services |
|   | 60 Wall Street, 26th floor |
|   | Mail Stop:  NYC60-2606 |
|   | New York, NY 10005 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | ACOLT 2013-SN1 - Servicing Agreement |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of June 5, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the ACOLT 2013-SN1 Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the ACOLT 2013-SN1  Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,     Respondent     v.   JASON PARKER,     Petitioner 

No. 282 EAL 2015   Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
#### Gerald N. PELLEGRINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANALOG DEVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2008-1091.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 12, 2007.

Gerald N. Pellegrini, pro se.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
#### Moshe Rothman vs. Jon Trister.

March 21, 2008.

*Supreme Judicial Court,*

Appeal from order of single justice, Superintendence of inferior courts.

*Moshe Rothman,*pro se.

*Brooks L. Glahn,*for the defendant, submitted a brief.

The petitioner, Moshe Rothman, appeals from the judgment of a single justice of this court denying relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. We affirm.

The single justice of this court correctly determined that this was not an appropriate occasion to exercise the court’s extraordinary power of general superintendence. The petitioner’s failure to perfect his appeals in the Appeals Court was of his own doing. Although he was acting pro se, he nevertheless was bound to comply with the governing court rules. See *Mmoe*v. *Commonwealth,*393 Mass. 617, 620 (1985); *International Fid. Ins. Co.*v. *Wilson,*387 Mass. 841, 847 (1983). Moreover, there was no demonstration in the petitioner’s submissions before the single justice of this court, or in his submissions before the full court, that the single justices of the Appeals Court had erred or abused their discretion. See *Tisei*v. *Building Inspector of Marlborough,*3 Mass. App. Ct. 377, 379 (1975) (discussing moving party’s burden in seeking permission to docket appeal late).

*Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended September 30, 2016 , as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce D. Batkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory M. Pinkus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 1, 2017


/s/ Bruce D. BatkinBruce D. BatkinChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Gregory M. PinkusGregory M. PinkusChief Financial Officer,Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Secretary(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00178-CV

James W. LANDESS,

Appellant

v.

Veronica Bosque Landess MCGLOHN,

Appellees

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CI19372

The Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 27, 2018

DISMISSED

On March 22, 2018, James W. Landess filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s 

judgment signed February 5, 2018. The record was due June 5, 2018, 120 days after the judgment 

was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1(a), 26.1(a). The Bexar County District Clerk filed a 

notification stating the clerk’s record would not be filed because Landess had not paid or made 

arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee to prepare the record and is not entitled to appeal without 

paying the fee. On June 8, 2018, we ordered Landess to provide written proof to this court by June 

18, 2018, that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the 

clerk’s fee; or (2) he is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. We cautioned that if 
04-18-00178-CV

- 2 -

Landess failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(c). Landess has not filed a response and the clerk’s record has not been filed. 

We therefore order this appeal dismissed. 

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 15.2


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
DATATRAK International, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-16061 and 333-26251) pertaining to the Collaborative
Clinical Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Share Incentive Plan,
Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Directors' Share
Option Plan, Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1996
Outside Directors Stock Option Plan and the Collaborative Clinical Research,
Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Key Employees and Consultants Stock Option Plan
and the DATATRAK International, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan of our reports
dated April 20, 2000 and July 19, 2000 relating to the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial statements of DATATRAK International, Inc.
(formerly, Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc.) and subsidiaries that are
included in its Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2000 and June 30,
2000.

                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
July 19, 2000
**EXHIBIT 10.16**

 

**CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE**

 

February __, 2020

 

| **PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: USD$1,300,000** | **DUE: August __, 2020** |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------|

   

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Allied Corp. (the "**Borrower**" or the “**Company**”), company incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada, hereby promises to pay Allied Special Opportunities Limited (the "**Lender**"), at such address or at such other place as the Lender may from time to time designate by written notice to the Borrower, the principal amount of One Million Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,300,000), ON DEMAND at any time after 179 days from the date hereof (the "**Principal Amount**"), in lawful money of the United States of America, with simple interest at 10% per annum..

 

The Borrower may pre-pay the Principal Amount and any unpaid interest or any portion thereof at any time and from time to time without notice, further interest, bonus or penalty provided, however, that a minimum of six months interest shall be payable from the date hereof regardless of such repayment date.

 

At the option of Lender, this note is convertible at any time through that date which is 179 days from the date of issuance at a conversion price of $1.25 per share. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by both parties, at no time will the Lender convert any amount of this Note into common stock that would result in the Lender owning more than 9.9% of the common stock outstanding. 

 

The Company hereby grants to Lender a security interest in the Company’s collateral pursuant to the terms of that certain Security Agreement of even date herewith, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A hereto (the “Security Interest”).

 

PRESENTMENT for payment, demand, protest and notice of dishonour and protest hereof are hereby waived.

 

THIS PROMISSORY NOTE is governed by and shall be interpreted pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada and all federal laws of the United States of America applicable therein.

 

THIS PROMISSORY NOTE is not assignable by the Borrower without the prior written consent of the Lender.

    

| **ALLIED CORP.** |                                |
|------------------|--------------------------------|
|             |                           |   |
| By:              |                                |  |
|             | Name: Calum Hughes             |   |
|                  | Title: Chief Executive Officer |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 102 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 102

Requiring authorizing committees to hold annual hearings on Government 
  Accountability Office investigative reports on the identification, 
   consolidation, and elimination of duplicative Government programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2015

   Mr. Gardner (for himself and Mr. Peters) submitted the following 
     resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Requiring authorizing committees to hold annual hearings on Government 
  Accountability Office investigative reports on the identification, 
   consolidation, and elimination of duplicative Government programs.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Congressional Oversight to 
Start Taxpayer Savings Resolution'' or the ``COST Savings Resolution''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING COMMITTEE HEARINGS ON GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 
              OFFICE REPORTS.

    (a) Duplication Reports.--Not later than 90 days after the date on 
which the Comptroller General of the United States transmits each 
annual report to Congress identifying programs, agencies, offices, and 
initiatives with duplicative goals and activities within the Government 
under section 21 of the joint resolution entitled ``Joint Resolution 
increasing the statutory limit on the public debt'' (Public Law 111-
139; 31 U.S.C. 712 note), each standing committee of the Senate (except 
the Committee on Appropriations) with jurisdiction over any such 
program, agency, office, or initiative covered by that report shall 
conduct hearings on the recommendations for consolidation and 
elimination of such program, agency, office, or initiative.
    (b) High Risk List.--Not later than 90 days after the date on which 
the Comptroller General of the United States publishes a High Risk 
List, or any successor thereto, each standing committee of the Senate 
(except the Committee on Appropriations) with jurisdiction over any 
agency or program area on the High Risk List shall conduct hearings on 
the vulnerabilities to fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement, or need 
for transformation, of the agency or program area.
    (c) Joint Hearings.--For any program, agency, office, initiative, 
or program area over which more than 1 standing committee of the Senate 
(except the Committee on Appropriations) has jurisdiction, to the 
extent determined beneficial and appropriate by the Chairmen of the 
committees, the committees may hold joint hearings under subsection (a) 
or (b).
                                 <all>
```
Motion Granted; Order filed July 21, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00970-CR 

NO. 14-15-00971-CR

____________

JEROME FISHER PLEASANT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1347978 & 1347979

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion asking to review the record 

and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 

436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 339th District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that 

the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before August 5, 2016; that the 
clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant 

is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that 

date.

PER CURIAM
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 13 , 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00626

- CV

MYRTIS ALEXANDER , Appellant

V.

FIRST SHILOH BAPTIST CHURCH , Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 82555



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed May 31 , 2012. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On August 6 , 2012, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).2

Appellant has not provided t his court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and McCally.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42784-42785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19295]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-20-2017]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 43--Battle Creek, Michigan; 
Authorization of Production Activity; Mead Johnson & Company, LLC, dba 
Mead Johnson Nutritional; Subzone 43B; (Infant Formula/Nutritional 
Products); Zeeland, Michigan

    On March 27, 2017, Mead Johnson & Company, LLC, dba Mead Johnson

[[Page 42785]]

Nutritional, submitted a notification of proposed production activity 
to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 43B, in Zeeland, 
Michigan.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (82 FR 16786, April 6, 2017). On July 
25, 2017, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that 
no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: September 5, 2017.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19295 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 173 (Friday, September 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15284 and #15285; Idaho Disaster Number ID-
00069]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Idaho

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Idaho (FEMA-4333-
DR), dated 08/27/2017.
    Incident: Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.
    Incident Period: 05/06/2017 through 06/16/2017.

DATES: Issued on 08/27/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/26/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/28/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/27/2017, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Blaine, Camas, Custer, Elmore, Gooding

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 152846 
and for economic injury is 152850.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-19019 Filed 9-7-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P