alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SCERVINI v. MILES LABORATORIES, Inc.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 21, 1951.

Harry Price, New York City, for plaintiff.

Rogers, Hoge & Hills, New York City, for defendant (Rogers & Woodson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel).

LEIBELL, District Judge.

Defendant moves under Rule 12(e), Fed. Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., for “a more definite statement of the nature and substance of the allegations set forth in paragraphs numbered 21 and 22” of the complaint. Rule 12(e) provides that “If a pleading to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, he may move for a more definite statement before interposing his responsive pleading”.

*543Paragraphs 21 and 22, which are part of plaintiff’s second claim or cause of action, allege:

> “21. Upon information and belief, applications for such trade-marks were not duly filed and were not duly issued and Defendant falsely and deliberately represented to the Patent Office that said term One-A-Day or the end thereof ‘A-Day’ had become associated with its products and that it had exclusive use and ownership thereof, which statements and allegations to the Patent Office were false and without basis in law and fact and said applications were issued as trade-mark registrations by the Patent Office based upon Defendant’s wilful and knowing misrepresentations and misstatements to the Patent Office in connection with said applications which matured into said registrations.

> “22. Now that Defendant has obtained such trade-mark registrations which it persuaded the Patent Office to grant under mistake of law and mistake of fact, it is now threatening the Plaintiff and its customers, and prospective customers with infringement and injunction under said trade-mark registrations No. 397,637 and No. 523,578, which are in effect invalid and void and should be cancelled.”

Defendant contends that those allegations charge the defendant with fraud in applying for the registration of the trademarks, and allege a mistake of law and of fact on the part of the Patent Office in granting the application for the trade-mark registrations. Rule 9(b), F.R.Civ.Proc. provides that “In all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity” in a pleading. The defendant asserts that paragraphs 21 and 22 of the complaint do not comply with that rule.

In my opinion the allegations of paragraphs 21 and 22 of the complaint are in sufficient particularity to comply with Rule 9(b). Further, they are not vague or ambiguous, and accordingly do not come within the purview of Rule 12(e). The allegations of paragraphs 21 and 22 of the complaint are sufficiently clear and definite to enable the defendant to serve a responsive pleading. If the defendant wishes to obtain any additional information concerning those allegations it may serve interrogatories on the plaintiff in accordance with Rule 33, F.R.Civ.Proc.

The defendant’s motion is denied. Settle an order.
IIA 

Calendar No. 285 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 20 

Relating to the approval of the proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between 

the United States of America and the Government of the Republic 

of Korea Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2015 

Mr. CARDIN (by request) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

OCTOBER 29, 2015 

Committee discharged pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2159(i) and Section 601(b)(4) 

of Public Law 94–329, and placed on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the approval of the proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between the United States of America and 

the Government of the Republic of Korea Concerning 

Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress does favor the proposed agreement for 

4 cooperation transmitted to the Congress by the President 

5 on June 16, 2015. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 285 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 20 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the approval of the proposed Agreement 

ergy. Korea Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear EnAmerica and the Government of the Republic of for Cooperation Between the United States of 

OCTOBER 29, 2015 

Committee discharged pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2159(i) and 

on the calendar Section 601(b)(4) of Public Law 94–329, and placed 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15257 and #15258; WEST VIRGINIA Disaster Number WV-00047]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-4331-DR), dated 08/18/2017. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides. *Incident Period:*
                         07/28/2017 through 07/29/2017.
 DATES: Issued on August 18, 2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/17/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/18/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 08/18/2017, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide  essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Doddridge, Harrison, Marion, Marshall, Monongalia, Ohio, Preston, Randolph, Taylor, Tucker, Tyler, Wetzel The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 152576 and for economic injury is 152580.
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2017-18036 Filed 8-24-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 8/30/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD NAGOL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

vs.

LUNA, COUNTY OF; ERNEST

BOWEN, Officer, Lieutenant; JAMES

CLAY, Sheriff; MANUEL DV

SAUCEDO, Judge; FRED GIFFORD,

Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 95-2243

(D.C. No. CIV 94-961)

(D.N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

Plaintiff-Appellant Richard Nagol challenges the district court’s injunction 

enjoining him from filing civil or criminal proceedings, except under certain conditions. 

In entering its order, the district court took judicial notice of the fact that Mr. Nagol has a
- 2 -

“lengthy history of filing meritless claims.” Aplee. Supp. App. doc. 1 (D. Ct. Order filed

Oct. 24, 1995). Specifically, Mr. Nagol had filed six suits within five months. Mr.

Nagol’s litigious nature led the state court to impose a similar restriction on him. 

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), a court has the power to protect itself from the

deleterious impact of repetitive, unfounded pro se litigation. Tripati v. Beaman, 878 F.2d

351, 352 (10th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); accord Werner v. Utah, 32 F.3d 1446, 1449 (10th

Cir. 1994) (per curiam); Winslow v. Hunter (In re Winslow), 17 F.3d 314, 315-16 (10th

Cir. 1994) (per curiam). “[I]njunctions are proper where the litigant’s abusive and

lengthy history is properly set forth.” Tripati, 878 F.2d at 353. In restricting a litigant’s

access, the court must provide guidelines as to what the litigant must do to file suit. Id. at

354; accord Werner, 32 F.3d at 1449; Winslow, 17 F.3d at 316-17. In this case, both

conditions were satisfied. The district court’s narrowly written requirement that Mr.

Nagol be represented by counsel or have prior judicial approval to file suits is permissible

under the circumstances. See Tripati, 878 F.2d at 353; accord Werner, 32 F.3d at 1449;

Winslow, 17 F.3d at 316-17.

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
<TABLE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                            HAMPSHIRE GROUP, LIMITED
                   STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>
                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                ---------------------
                                                March 29,    March 30,
                                                  1997         1996
                                                --------     --------
                                               (Unaudited) (Unaudited)
<S>                                              <C>           <C>
Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding           3,851         3,751
                                                 =====         =====
Net loss                                         ($260)        ($526)

Less - preferred dividend requirements             (44)          (48)
                                                 -----         -----
Net loss applicable to common stock              ($304)        ($574)
                                                 =====         =====
Net loss per share applicable to 
  common stock                                  ($0.07)       ($0.15)
                                                 =====         =====







                                       1
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31

SEMT 2013-7

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)
Certification.

I, Christopher J. Abate, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-7 (the
Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Corelogic Tax Services, LLC, Assurant, Inc., Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.

Date: April 1, 2019



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ Christopher J. Abate
|Signature               

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Financial Officer

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-192024 and 333-197373) of Criteo S.A. and subsidiaries
of our reports dated March 27, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Criteo S.A. and subsidiaries (the Group) and the effectiveness of the Groups internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 20-F of Criteo S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2014.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Associés        
|                               
|Represented by Fabien Brovedani
|Neuilly-sur-Seine, France      
|March 27, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19244]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC17-271-000]


Black Marlin Pipeline Company; Notice of Request for Waiver

    Take notice that on September 1, 2017, Black Marlin Pipeline 
Company filed a request for waiver of requirements to file FERC Form 
No. 2-A and 3-Q, as required by 18 CFR 260.2 and 18 CFR 260.300.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#387e7d6a7b77565451565d6b4d4848574a4c785e5d4a5b165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="42040710010d2c2e2b2c27113732322d303602242730216c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comments: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September 22, 2017.

    Dated: September 6, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19244 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 26, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-01375-CV ERNEST C. THIBODEAUX, Appellant V. REBECCA THIBODEAUX, Appellee On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-1300799 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard dated October 2, 2013, we notified appellant the $175 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appe al. Also by postcard dated October 2, 2013, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not b een filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. By letters dated October 4, 2013 and December 13, 2013 we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verifica tion he had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written documenta tion that he had been–2– found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dism issal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statem ent, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with th e Court regarding the stat us of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

131375F.P05
/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
ERNEST C. THIBODEAUX, Appellant
No. 05-13-01375-CV V. REBECCA THIBODEAUX, Appellee On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-1300799. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee REBECCA THIBODEA UX recover her costs of this appeal from appellant ERNEST C. THIBODEAUX.
Judgment entered March 26, 2014

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/Timothy M. MaylebenTimothy M. MaylebenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/Scott C. DurbinScott C. DurbinChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vikram S. Uppal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory M. Pinkus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: February 21, 2020
 /s/ Vikram S. UppalVikram S. UppalChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Gregory M. PinkusGregory M. PinkusChief Financial Officer,Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Secretary(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)