alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UC Agreement No.: [****]


UC Case No(s): [****]







AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LETTER OF INTENT







This Amendment No. 1 to the Letter of Intent dated as of May 11, 2010 and bearing UC Agreement No. [****] (“Agreement”) by and between The Regents of the University of California (“The Regents”) and Appeal Capital Corp. (“Appeal Capital”) is effective September 10, 2010.







WHEREAS, the parties desire to add to the Inventions covered under the Agreement UC Case No. [****] ([****]);







WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge that The Regents will authorize its patent counsel prepare and file a provisional patent application covering UC Case No. [****]during the Term of the Agreement and Appeal Capital will reimburse The Regents for such patent costs and any other patent costs related to UC Case No. [****]incurred by The Regents during the Term; and







WHEREAS, for mutual consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties desire to modify the terms of the Agreement.







NOW THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:







1.           Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning set forth in the Agreement.







2.           The following UC Case is hereby added to the definition of Inventions under the Agreement:







“UC Case No. [****] ([****]).”







3.           As of the effective date of this Amendment No.1 to the Agreement, all references to the Inventions in the Agreement will include UC Case No. [****]and all obligations on the part of either party with regard to the Inventions will include UC Case No. [****], including, but not limited to, obligations to reimburse patent costs and obligations, if any, with regard to Appeal Capital paying estimated patent costs prior to authorization of filings by The Regents.







4.           The following fee is hereby added to the Agreement and will be attributable to UC Case No. [****]:







“A one-time non-creditable, non-refundable fee of $[****].”  A check in the amount of $[****]for the fee should be enclosed when this Amendment No. 1 is returned to The Regents for final execution.  The check should be made out to The Regents of the University of California.







5.           Except as expressly modified herein, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and are hereby reaffirmed by the parties.







ACCEPTED AND AGREED:








	
APPEAL CAPITAL CORP.

	  	
  

	 
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 


	  	  	  	  	  	 
	
By:

	  	  	
By:

	  
	  	  	  	  	  	 
	
Name: 

	  	  	
Name: Sherylle Mills Englander


	  	  	  	  	  	 
	
Title:

	  	  	
Title: Director,


	  	  	  	  	  	 
Technology & Industry Alliances


	  	  	  	  	  	 
	
Date:

	  	  	
  

	 
Date:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of
Zero Gravity Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Glenn Stinebaugh, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)	the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|/s/ Glenn Stinebaugh            | 
|------------------------------- | 
|                                | 
|Chief Executive Officer         | 
|and Principal Executive Officer | 







March 31, 2015



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 12.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO

EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Ariel Katz, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Enzymotec
Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.



|/s/ Ariel Katz                        | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Ariel Katz                            | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)         | 
|Date: February 13, 2014               |
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-13-00419-CR 

EDWARD CHARLES KELLY, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 222nd District Court 

Deaf Smith County, Texas 

Trial Court No. CR-13H-080, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding 

 

May 29, 2014 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Edward Charles Kelly appeals his conviction for assaulting a public servant. Via 

this appeal, he challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Allegedly, 

he was the victim of an illegal traffic stop. During that stop, the deputy discovered that 

there was an outstanding warrant for appellant’s arrest. When effort was made to 

enforce that warrant, appellant attempted to flee. That resulted in a physical altercation 

between appellant and the deputy. That physical altercation gave rise to the charge for 

which appellant was convicted. Appellant argues that because the initial stop was 

illegal, evidence of the ensuing altercation should have been suppressed. We affirm the 

judgment. 
2

We begin our analysis by referring to our opinion in Bryant v. State, 253 S.W.2d 

810 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2008, pet. dism’d). Therein, we held that “a person who is 

stopped or detained illegally is not immunized from prosecution for crimes committed 

during his detention period.” Id. at 812; see also Coleman v. State, No. 07-11-00305-

CR, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 3984, at *4-5 (Tex. App.—Amarillo May 15, 2012, pet. ref’d) 

(not designated for publication) (stating the same). Next, we refer to our opinion in 

Badilla v. State, No. 07-07-00081-CR, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 1465 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 

February 20, 2009, no pet.) (not designated for publication) wherein we said that 

“prosecution for assault on a public servant during the course of the arrest does not 

depend on the arrest's lawfulness.” Id. at *11. To that, we add the opinion of our Court 

of Criminal Appeals in State v. Mayorga, 901 S.W.2d 943 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995), 

wherein the court recognized that “it is no defense to prosecution [for resisting arrest]

that the arrest or search was unlawful.” Id. at 945. 

Combined, the foregoing precedent requires us to conclude that even if the stop 

of appellant was illegal, appellant remained subject to prosecution for assaulting the 

deputy. Moreover, the evidence of that assault was not subject to suppression because 

it did not exist at the time of the initial stop. Cooper v. State. 956 S.W.2d 95, 98 (Tex. 

App.—Tyler 1997, pet. ref’d); accord Bryant v. State, 253 S.W.3d at 812 (applying the 

same rationale when the glass pipe was destroyed after the detention began). 

We overrule appellant’s sole issue and affirm the judgment. 

Brian Quinn 

Chief Justice 

Do not publish.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2305 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2305

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make memorial headstones and 
    markers available for purchase on behalf of members of reserve 
  components who performed inactive duty training or active duty for 
               training but did not serve on active duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2011

 Ms. Hayworth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make memorial headstones and 
    markers available for purchase on behalf of members of reserve 
  components who performed inactive duty training or active duty for 
               training but did not serve on active duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Memorialize Our Guardsmen and 
Reservists Act''.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY FOR PURCHASE OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              MEMORIAL HEADSTONES AND MARKERS FOR MEMBERS OF RESERVE 
              COMPONENTS WHO PERFORMED CERTAIN TRAINING.

    Section 2306 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h)(1) The Secretary shall make available for purchase a memorial 
headstone or marker for the marked or unmarked grave of an individual 
described in paragraph (2) or for the purpose of commemorating such an 
individual whose remains are unavailable.
    ``(2) An individual described in this paragraph is an individual 
who--
            ``(A) as a member of a reserve component performed inactive 
        duty training or active duty for training, but did not serve on 
        active duty; and
            ``(B) is not otherwise ineligible for a memorial headstone 
        or marker on account of the nature of the individual's 
        separation from the Armed Forces or other cause.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED

DECEMBER 15, 2010 BETWEEN MTR GAMING GROUP, INC., AND FRED BURO

 

WHEREAS, Presque Isle Downs, Inc. (the “Company”), a wholly owned subsidiary of MTR Gaming Group, Inc. (“MTR”), and Fred Buro (the “Executive”) (collectively the “Parties”), entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) on or about December 15, 2010 securing the employment of Executive as President and General Manager of the Company;

 

WHEREAS, the Parties, in exchange for the consideration detailed below, the sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the Parties mutually desire to amend the Agreement as follows:

 

	
Section 1, EMPLOYER:
    	
 
    	
Employer will now be the parent Company, MTR   Gaming Group, Inc.; and
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Section 4, DUTIES:
    	
 
    	
Executive is being promoted/appointed to the   position of Chief Marketing Officer and Vice President; and
    


 

	
Section 5, COMPENSATION &   BENEFITS:
    	
 
    	
(a) Executive’s base   salary is being raised to $290,000.00.
    


 

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that other than the specific sections described above, all other Terms of the Agreement remain in force and are specifically incorporated by reference herein.

 

WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby affix their signature below, intending to be legally bound and specifically agreeing to the terms of this First Amendment this 2nd Day of December 2011.

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Fred Buro
    	
 
    	
/s/ Jeffrey J. Dahl
    
	
FRED BURO
    	
 
    	
JEFFREY J. DAHL
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
AS, PRESIDENT AND C.E.O. OF MTR GAMING   GROUP, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Dated: 2 December, 2011
    	
 
    	
Dated: 2 December, 2011
#### Pope Manuf’g Co. *v.*Marqua and others.*

*(Circuit Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.*

March 5, 1883.)

1. Reissues Invalid Because op Unreasonable Delay in Applying por Teem.

On demurrer to bill of complaint, upon reissued patents, one of which was reissued 13 and the other 11 years after the originals were issued, *held,*that the right to have the patents reissued had been abandoned and lost by unreasonable delay, and that the reissues are, therefore, invalid.

2. Suits on Patents—Multipariousness op Bill.

When the bill of complaint seeks relief upon two patents and fails to show that they are capable of conjoint use or have been in fact so used by defendants, *qume,*whether the bill is multifarious.

3. Reissues Nos. 7,972 and 8,252, for improvements in velocipedes, *held*invalid.

In Equity. Suits on reissues Nos. 7,972 and 8,252, for improvements in velocipedes. The original patents were Nos. 59,915 and 46,705, respectively.

*Coburn <& Thacker,*for complainant.

, *Stem & Peck*and *Wood é Boyd,*for respondents.,

*

 Reported by J. O. Harper, Esq., of tbe Cincinnati bar.

Baxter, J.

This is a bill to restrain further infringement and recover for past infringement of two reissued patents. The original of one of them was issued on the seventh of March, 1865, and was reissued May 28, 1878. The original of the other was issued twentieth December, 1866, and: was reissued November 27, 1877. The bill is demurred to.

.Complainant fails to show by his bill that the two inventions alleged to have been infringed are capable of conjoint use, or that they have in fact been, so used by defendant. For the want of this averment it is insisted that the bill is multifarious, etc. 3 Fisher, 63; 6 Fisher, 286; and *Gamewell, etc., Co.*v. *City of Chillicothe,*7 Fed. Rep. 354-5.

I am inclined to think the demurrer is well taken. But in view of another question raised by the demurrer, which is clearly fatal, I have not fully considered, nor have I deemed it necessary to decide, whether the bill is or is not multifarious.

One of the patents was reissued 13 and the other 11 years after the original. The right to this reissue had been abandoned and lost by unreasonable delay. *Bantz*v. *Frantz,*105 U. S. 160, and *Miller*v. *Bridgeport Brass Co.*104 U. S. 350, decided at the last term of the United States supreme court. The reissued letters sued on are therefore invalid. Complainant’s bill will be dismissed, with costs..
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 181 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 181

Designating May 19, 2015, as ``National Schizencephaly Awareness Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2015

   Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Ms. Heitkamp) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating May 19, 2015, as ``National Schizencephaly Awareness Day''.

Whereas schizencephaly is an extremely rare developmental birth defect 
        characterized by abnormal slits, or clefts, in the brain;
Whereas individuals with bilateral schizencephaly, the more severe case, 
        commonly have developmental delays, delays in speech and language 
        skills, problems with brain-spinal cord communication, limited mobility, 
        and shorter lifespans;
Whereas schizencephaly is the second rarest brain malformation, and only 
        approximately 7,000 cases have ever been reported;
Whereas promoting education and increasing awareness among health professionals 
        and families will lead to early intervention and treatment options for 
        individuals with schizencephaly; and
Whereas continued Federal support for medical research will help identify 
        causes, improve diagnostics, and develop promising treatments for 
        schizencephaly: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates May 19, 2015, as ``National 
Schizencephaly Awareness Day''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43238-43239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19499]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and 
the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.

    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention 
and Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--PAR 13-129, NIOSH Member 
Conflict Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: October 25, 2017.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Teleconference.
    Agenda: The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, 
and evaluation of applications received in response to PAR 13-129, 
NIOSH Member Conflict Special Emphasis Panel.
    For FuRther Information Contact: Nina Turner, Ph.D. Scientific 
Review Officer, CDC, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 
26506, (304) 285-5976, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f59b8d81c7b5969196db929a83"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cca2b4b8fe8cafa8afe2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and

[[Page 43239]]

Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2017-19499 Filed 9-13-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Aastrom Biosciences, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/Timothy M. MaylebenTimothy M. MaylebenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)