alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 43034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4332-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Texas; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas (FEMA-4332-DR), dated August 25, 2017, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 4, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
August 25, 2017.

    Austin, Bastrop, DeWitt, Gonzales, Karnes, Lavaca, and Lee 
Counties for Individual Assistance and assistance for debris removal 
and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including 
direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.
    Aransas, Brazoria, Calhoun, Chambers, Colorado, Fayette, Fort 
Bend, Galveston, Goliad, Hardin, Harris, Jackson, Jasper, Jefferson, 
Liberty, Matagorda, Montgomery, Newton, Nueces, Orange, Polk, San 
Jacinto, San Patricio, Tyler, Victoria, Walker, Waller, and Wharton 
Counties for Public Assistance [Categories C-G] (already designated 
for Individual Assistance and assistance for debris removal and 
emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including direct 
federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-19383 Filed 9-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief executive officer of Simmons Company (the "Company"), does hereby certify
that to the undersigned's knowledge:

     1)   the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
          28, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   the information contained in the Company's quarterly report on Form
          10-Q for the quarter ended June 28, 2003 fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                      /s/ Charles R. Eitel
                                      --------------------
                                      Charles R. Eitel
                                      Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 11, 2003




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simmons Company and will be retained by Simmons Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       34
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements in OrthoLogic  Corporation's report Form 10-Q for the three
month  period ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           1,385,746 
<SECURITIES>                                     3,495,470 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,584,980 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,093,657 
<INVENTORY>                                     11,732,694 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,565,163 
<PP&E>                                          13,163,467 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,117,203 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,103,139 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,095,961 
<BONDS>                                                  0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                            12,637 
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,628,351 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,103,139 
<SALES>                                          6,926,955 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,108,860 
<CGS>                                            2,856,695 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,920,120 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,130,201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           196 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,130,005)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,130,005)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.36)
                                                

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 27, 2014

No. 04-13-00694-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.F., M.F., AND J.I., CHILDREN,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PA-00745

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights. 

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 

738 (1967). In a November 13, 2013 order, this Court gave appellant a deadline of December 3, 

2013 to file his pro se brief. This Court then granted him an extension to December 23, 2013. 

Appellant did not timely file a pro se brief, but instead mailed a letter on January 13, 2014. In the 

letter, appellant requests appointment of a new court-appointed attorney, a sign-language 

interpreter, and another extension in which to file his brief. Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on January 27, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2017 

ELAINE MURRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS; CUMBERLAND COUNTY

BUSINESS COUNCIL; THE LUNDY GROUP; 300 BLOCK

INVESTORS LLC; PENNINK & STROTHER PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (5:05-cv-00861-BR)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 29, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elaine Murry, Appellant Pro Se. James R. Nance, Jr., REID, LEWIS,

DEESE, NANCE & PERSON, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Karen M.

McDonald, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, Fayetteville, North Carolina;

Douglas Edward Canders, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,

Fayetteville, North Carolina; John Roseboro, THE BANKS LAW FIRM,

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; Steven B. Epstein, Raymond

Albert Starling, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Raleigh, North Carolina; Garris
- 2 -

Neil Yarborough, THE YARBOROUGH LAW FIRM, Fayetteville, North

Carolina; Steven James O’Connor, MCCOY, WEAVER, WIGGINS, CLEVELAND

& RAPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Elaine Murry appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§§ 1982 and 2000d (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Murry v. City of Fayetteville, No. 5:05-

CV-861-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, GaryD. Blackford, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

Date:August 11, 2010

 
| /s/    | Gary  D. Blackford         |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   | Gary  D. Blackford         |   |
|   | Chairman  of the Board and |   |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer   |   |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2013-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 

Dated March 21, 2014

 
|   | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|   | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|   | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|   | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
EX-10.04                   


CHINA BULL MANAGEMENT INC


Address:  665 Ellsworth Avenue


New Haven, CT 06511, USA


Email: uschien@uschinachannel.net


jcs23@yahoo.com


Telephone:  203-844-0809


203-562-8899


 


                                                 
 January 30, 2011


Board Minutes


 


The Board has made following decisions:


      (1) The existing shares of
common stock on the record day of January 30, 2011 will make 1 for 10 reverse split.


 


      (2) The company offers Andrew
Chien to purchase 900,000 shares at par value $0.0001 and Kin Yuet Li 10,000 shares at par value $0.0001.


 


      (3) The Board will make sale
part of its shares to shareholders at $0.5 /share. The proceeds will support the company’s operation.


 


      (4) The company will make
registration for all shares except officers’ before February 15, 2011.


 


                                    
Andrew Chien


                                    
President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SYLVESTER MILLER, § 

§ No. 337, 2018

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court of the

§ State of Delaware

v. §

§ Cr. ID No. 0408012099 (N)

STATE OF DELAWARE, §

§

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: July 9, 2018

Decided: July 17, 2018

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; SEITZ and TRAYNOR, Justices.

O R D E R

(1) The appellant, Sylvester Miller, is incarcerated at the James T. Vaughn 

Correctional Center. On June 29, 2018, Miller filed a notice of appeal from the 

Superior Court’s order of May 29, 2018, denying his fourth motion for 

postconviction relief. Miller’s appeal was untimely filed. To be timely filed, the 

notice of appeal had to be received by the Clerk of Court no later than June 28, 2018.

1

(2) The Clerk issued a notice directing Miller to show cause why the 

appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed.2 Miller filed a response to the 

notice, asserting that he mailed the notice of appeal from the prison on June 22, 

 

1 Del. Sup. Ct. R. 6(a)(iii), 10(a), 11(a). 

2 Del. Sup. Ct. R. 29(b).
2

2018. He contends that any delay in the Court’s receipt of the appeal must be due 

to “some problem with the mail room in the institution” where he is incarcerated.

(3) A notice of appeal must be received by the Clerk within the applicable 

time period to be effective.3 An untimely appeal cannot be considered unless an 

appellant can demonstrate that the failure to timely file the notice of appeal is 

attributable to court-related personnel.4

(4) Miller does not contend, and the record does not reflect, that his failure 

to file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel.5 

Consequently, this case does not fall within the exception to the general rule that 

mandates the timely filing of a notice of appeal.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 6 and 

29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice

 

3 Del. Sup. Ct. R. 10(a).

4 Bey v. State, 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979).

5 Zuppo v. State, 2011 WL 761523 (Del. March 3, 2011) (holding that prison personnel were not 

court-related personnel so that any delay allegedly caused by prison personnel in placing 

defendant's notice of appeal in the mail could not excuse an untimely appeal).
!"#"!#"$#   %  &'     (   )* +,, !"#"!#"$#-./	
.011233	.3"45300#( 6 6 7    !8%''.,%!"#"3#	
	.33!2!49!.43! "4 5 3	#  
   %),6..6,66/43!3
    .      &6.:!"#"!#"$#6%       .,;%< !"#"!#"$#, 6 	

	.039209.0"4530	#=.&       &
%***2   .  6 & >.7KH +RQRUDEOH $UWKXU - 7DUQRZ 8QLWHG 6WDWHV'LVWULFW-XGJH IRUWKH (DVWHUQ 'LVWULFW RI 0LFKLJDQ VLWWLQJ E\ GHVLJQDWLRQ35(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,213XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU)LOH 1DPH DS	

		2: 
=?*@
=5* 5
*AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA1,7('7$7(6 2)$0(5,&$.	2%(57B((&,7&+(//.		C	$
D5D:5,999!9EF5.DG$H&4.993D2H&3.993<H&$ 
*.5GI&:: ?.5GI$ :(.DG	

	AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD6GF.5,.:.$& G <. $*
$ 
*
?D 
$
?$

: ?J.5,.:.$
D6GF.5,.:.$&G<. $*
$ 
*
?D 
$
? $

: ?J.5,.:.$<:J5? 2 &$ 
*. G . 5 G  , B&  >   ,  2  . K$5$
? ?&$D*: 2, !. 3. 2 D ?$
;26&.    .    5,.:B$$&..6.     6. ; & ,(&6.6)/,   7  &    , .      66;6&,%,,$:,3.;&,'		

! ., ; &&
6   *K.     ,6.6&,'       , .)62F>6   
 $;   L,D.+-6/&  %      )F ,  L, D  6 /  & ,;  
  &>**&..,&2 5L!"#"!#"$#%.& !"#"!#"$#.)6      6  /
;  6 %.      6	
.013239.3!"4 5 300#  &       ,      && ,;  
    .6.&)/$.6%, !"#"!#"$#
EX-35.1
(logo) Rialto
CAPITAL

February 28, 2014

To:  Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor
     U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
     Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Certificate
     Administrator and Tax Administrator and Custodian


2013 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Name of Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificate Series:

* WFRBS 2013-C14

(Referred to herein as "Security Agreement" or "Security Agreements")

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as
special servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

1.  All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under
    each of the Security Agreements are performed on behalf of the Special
    Servicer.

2. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special
   Servicer for the period of June 6, 2013 to December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting
   Period") in accordance with the servicing agreements applicable to each
   Security Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

3.  To the best of my knowledge, Rialto has fulfilled all of its obligations
    under the terms of the Security Agreements, in all material respects for the
    Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to
    fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the
    nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herewith.


Certified by: /s/ Thekla Salzman
                  Thekla Salzman
                  Chief Administrative Officer


Date: February 28, 2014
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 25, 2013

h0617 

# Order

Clerk June 25, 2013

145976 & (30)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145976

COA: 309105

Wayne CC: 07

- 021541

- FC;

ISIAH MEADE, 07

- 021542

- FC

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it i s DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motion to remand is DENIED.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 26, 2016 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-01064-CV

BILL E. LEAVELL AND BARB ARA J. LEAVELL, Appellants V. INMAN A PLUS GUTTERS, PAINTING & SHEET METAL, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-14-1513



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justi ce Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The Court has before it appellants’ and appellee’s agreed motion for non-suit. The
parties represent that they have reached a “fu ll and final settlement of all issues” pending on
appeal.

We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2).

161064F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

BILL E. LEAVELL AN D BARBARA J. LEAVELL, Appellants

No. 05-16-01064-CV V.

INMAN A PLUS GUTTERS, PAINTING & SHEET METAL, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-14-1513. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Pursuant to their agreement, each party shal l bear their costs incurred in this appeal.

Judgment entered October 26, 2016.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief executive officer of Simmons Company (the "Company"), does hereby certify
that to the undersigned's knowledge:

     1) the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
        29, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) the information contained in the Company's quarterly report on Form
        10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2003 fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.


                                    --------------------
                                    Charles R. Eitel
                                    Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May __, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simmons Company and will be retained by Simmons Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.