Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 41529 

40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, National parks, 

Wilderness areas. 

Dated: August 21, 2017. 

Robert A. Kaplan, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 and 81 are amended 

as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart P—Indiana 

■ 2. Section 52.776 is amended by 

revising paragraph (w)(3) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.776 Control strategy: Particulate 

matter. 

* * * * * 

(w) * * * 

(3) Indiana’s 2005 NOX, directly 

emitted PM2.5, and SO2 emissions 

inventory; and 2007 VOCs and ammonia 

emissions inventory, satisfy the 

emissions inventory requirements of 

section 172(c)(3) for the CincinnatiHamilton area. 

* * * * * 

PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS 

FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

PURPOSES 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 81 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 4. Section 81.315 is amended by 

revising the entry for CincinnatiHamilton, IN in the table entitled 

‘‘Indiana—1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS’’ 

to read as follows: 

§ 81.315 Indiana. 

* * * * * 

INDIANA—1997 ANNUAL PM2.5 NAAQS 

[Primary and Secondary] 

Designated area 

Designation a Classification 

Date 1 Type Date 2 Type 

*******

Cincinnati-Hamilton, IN: 

Dearborn County (part): Lawrenceburg Township ........... September 1, 2017 ................ Attainment ..... ........................ ........................

* * * * * * * 

a Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. 

1This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted. 

2This date is July 2, 2014, unless otherwise noted. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2017–18498 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 1 

[WT Docket No. 15–180; DA 16–900] 

First Amendment to Collocation 

Agreement 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 

(WTB or Bureau) of the Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC or 

Commission) announces that the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved, for a period of three years, 

certain information collection 

requirements associated with 

Stipulation VII.C of the amendment to 

Appendix B in part 1 of the 

Commission’s rules. This notice is 

consistent with the final rule notice 

published in the Federal Register on 

August 29, 2016, announcing the First 

Amendment to the Collocation 

Agreement amending the Nationwide 

Programmatic Agreement for the 

Collocation of Wireless Antennas 

(Collocation Agreement), which stated 

that the Commission would publish a 

document in the Federal Register 

announcing OMB approval and the 

effective date of the new information 

collection requirements. 

DATES: 47 CFR part 1, Appendix B, 

Stipulation VII.C, published at 81 FR 

59146, August 29, 2016, is effective on 

September 1, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information, contact Cathy 

Williams by email at Cathy.Williams@

fcc.gov and telephone at (202) 418– 

2918. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document announces that, on July 14, 

2017, OMB approved certain 

information collection requirements 

contained in the Commission’s First 

Amendment to the Collocation 

Agreement, DA 16–900, published at 81 

FR 59146, August 29, 2016. The OMB 

Control Number is 3060–1238. The 

Commission publishes this notice as an 

announcement of the effective date of 

these information collection 

requirements. 

Synopsis 

As required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507), 

the Commission is notifying the public 

that it received OMB approval on July 

14, 2017, for the new information 

collection requirements contained in the 

Commission’s rules at 47 CFR part 1, 

Appendix B, Stipulation VII.C. Under 5 

CFR part 1320, an agency may not 

conduct or sponsor a collection of 

information unless it displays a current, 

valid OMB Control Number. No person 

shall be subject to any penalty for failing 

to comply with a collection of 

information subject to the Paperwork 

Reduction Act that does not display a 

current, valid OMB Control Number. 

The OMB Control Number is 3060– 

1238. The foregoing notice is required 

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995, Public Law 104–13, October 1, 

1995, and 44 U.S.C. 3507. 

The total annual reporting burdens 

and costs for the respondents are as 

follows: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1238. 

OMB Approval Date: July 14, 2017. 

OMB Expiration Date: July 31, 2020. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
41530 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 

Title: First Amendment to Nationwide 

Programmatic Agreement for the 

Collocation of Wireless Antennas. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities, not-for-profit institutions, 

and State, local, or Tribal governments. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 71 respondents; 765 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 1 

hour–5 hours. 

Frequency of Response: Third-party 

disclosure reporting requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 7, 301, 

303, 309, and 332 of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 

157, 301, 303, 309, 332, and section 106 

of the National Historic Preservation Act 

of 1966, 54 U.S.C. 306108. 

Total Annual Burden: 2,869 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $82,285. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

No known confidentiality between third 

parties. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: There 

are no impacts under the Privacy Act. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

requested OMB approval for new 

disclosure requirements pertaining to 

the First Amendment to Nationwide 

Programmatic Agreement for the 

Collocation of Wireless Antennas (First 

Amendment) to address the review of 

deployments of small wireless antennas 

and associated equipment under section 

106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act (NHPA) (54 U.S.C. 

306108 (formerly codified at 16 U.S.C. 

470f). The FCC, the Advisory Council 

on Historic Preservation (Council), and 

the National Conference of State 

Historic Preservation Officers 

(NCSHPO) agreed to amend the 

Nationwide Programmatic Agreement 

for the Collocation of Wireless Antennas 

(Collocation Agreement) to account for 

the limited potential of small wireless 

antennas and associated equipment, 

including Distributed Antenna Systems 

(DAS) and small cell facilities, to affect 

historic properties. The Collocation 

Agreement addresses historic 

preservation review for collocations on 

existing towers, buildings, and other 

non-tower structures. Under the 

Collocation Agreement, most antenna 

collocations on existing structures are 

excluded from section 106 historic 

preservation review, with a few 

exceptions defined to address 

potentially problematic situations. On 

August 3, 2016, the Commission’s 

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 

ACHP, and NCSHPO finalized and 

executed the First Amendment to the 

Collocation Agreement, to tailor the 

Section 106 process for small wireless 

deployments by excluding deployments 

that have minimal potential for adverse 

effects on historic properties. 

The following are the information 

collection requirements in connection 

with the amended provisions of 

Appendix B of Part 1 of the 

Commission’s rules (47 CFR pt.1, App. 

B): 

• Stipulation VII.C of the amended 

Collocation Agreement provides that 

proposals to mount a small antenna on 

a traffic control structure (i.e., traffic 

light) or on a light pole, lamp post or 

other structure whose primary purpose 

is to provide public lighting, where the 

structure is located inside or within 250 

feet of the boundary of a historic 

district, are generally subject to review 

through the section 106 process. These 

proposed collocations will be excluded 

from such review on a case-by-case 

basis, if (1) the collocation licensee or 

the owner of the structure has not 

received written or electronic 

notification that the FCC is in receipt of 

a complaint from a member of the 

public, an Indian Tribe, a SHPO or the 

Council, that the collocation has an 

adverse effect on one or more historic 

properties; and (2) the structure is not 

historic (not a designated National 

Historic Landmark or a property listed 

in or eligible for listing in the National 

Register of Historic Places) or 

considered a contributing or compatible 

element within the historic district, 

under certain procedures. These 

procedures require that applicant must 

request in writing that the SHPO concur 

with the applicant’s determination that 

the structure is not a contributing or 

compatible element within the historic 

district, and the applicant’s written 

request must specify the traffic control 

structure, light pole, or lamp post on 

which the applicant proposes to 

collocate and explain why the structure 

is not a contributing element based on 

the age and type of structure, as well as 

other relevant factors. The SHPO has 

thirty days from its receipt of such 

written notice to inform the applicant 

whether it disagrees with the applicant’s 

determination that the structure is not a 

contributing or compatible element 

within the historic district. If within the 

thirty-day period, the SHPO informs the 

applicant that the structure is a 

contributing element or compatible 

element within the historic district or 

that the applicant has not provided 

sufficient information for a 

determination, the applicant may not 

deploy its facilities on that structure 

without completing the Section 106 

review process. If, within the thirty-day 

period, the SHPO either informs the 

applicant that the structure is not a 

contributing or compatible element 

within the historic district, or the SHPO 

fails to respond to the applicant within 

the thirty-day period, the applicant has 

no further Section 106 review 

obligations, provided that the 

collocation meets the certain volumetric 

and ground disturbance provisions. The 

First Amendment to the Collocation 

Agreement establishes new exclusions 

from the section 106 review process for 

physically small deployments like DAS 

and small cells, fulfilling a directive in 

the Commission’s Infrastructure Report 

and Order, 80 FR 1238, Jan. 8, 2015, to 

further streamline review of these 

installations. These new exclusions will 

reduce the cost, time, and burden 

associated with deploying small 

facilities in many settings, and provide 

opportunities to increase densification 

at low cost and with very little impact 

on historic properties. Facilitating these 

deployments thus directly advances 

efforts to roll out 5G service in 

communities across the country. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Amy Brett, 

Associate Chief, Competition and 

Infrastructure Policy Division, Wireless 

Telecommunications Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18565 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 1, 22, 24, 27, 30, 74, 80, 

90, 95, and 101 

[WT Docket No. 10–112; FCC 17–105] 

Uniform License Renewal, 

Discontinuance of Operation, and 

Geographic Partitioning and Spectrum 

Disaggregation Rules and Policies for 

Certain Wireless Radio Services 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission adopts 

rules to streamline and harmonize the 

Commission’s license renewal and 

service continuity rules for the Wireless 

Radio Services (WRS). This unified 

regulatory framework includes: 

establishing a consistent standard for 

renewing wireless licenses; setting forth 

safe harbors providing expedited 

renewal for licensees that meet their 

initial term construction requirement 

and generally remain operating at or 

above that level; adopting consistent 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES