alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 253 

Welcoming King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia of Spain on their official 

visit to the United States, including visits to Miami and St. Augustine, 

Florida. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 

Mr. NELSON (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. KAINE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Welcoming King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia of Spain on 

their official visit to the United States, including visits 

to Miami and St. Augustine, Florida. 

Whereas King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia of Spain are visiting St. Augustine, Florida, to celebrate the 450th Commemoration of the city and to participate in the annual 

United States-Spain Council forum; 

Whereas Spanish explorer Ponce de Leo ́n landed on the east 

coast of Florida in 1513 and named the land he discovered La Florida; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 253 ATS 

Whereas St. Augustine was founded by Spanish admiral 

Pedro Mene ́ndez de Avile ́s on September 8, 1565; 

Whereas St. Augustine is the oldest continuously occupied 

European settlement in the United States; 

Whereas the United States-Spain Council serves an important purpose in bringing the United States and Spain 

closer through trade, investment, education, and culture, 

as well as by fostering military cooperation between the 

2 countries; 

Whereas the United States-Spain Council is holding its annual forum in St. Augustine from September 18–20, 

2015; 

Whereas the people and Governments of the United States 

and Spain have both benefitted from strong economic and 

cultural ties; 

Whereas Spain has played a special role in the history and 

culture of St. Augustine and Florida; and 

Whereas King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia met with President Barack Obama on September 15, 2015, for their 

first official visit to the White House: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) welcomes King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia 

3 of Spain during their visit to the United States; and 

4 (2) expresses its appreciation for the efforts of 

5 King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia to strengthen the 

6 bonds between the people and Governments of the 

7 United States and Spain. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**KENNETH LEE RICHIE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 327 WAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 24th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of t his matter.**
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 24 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of a rule submitted by the 

Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Carbon 

Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary 

Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Carbon Pollu5 tion Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: 

6 Electric Utility Generating Units’’ (published at 80 Fed. 

7 Reg. 64662 (October 23, 2015)), and such rule shall have 

8 no force or effect. 

Passed the Senate November 17, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 24 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chaptric Utility Generating Units’’. Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Elec- Agency relating to ‘‘Carbon Pollution Emission submitted by the Environmental Protection ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of a rule
#### Anibal Benjamin SANCHEZ-GARCIA, Teresa Vargas Vargas-Sanchez, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-77293.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 2007.**

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Daniel E. Chavez, Esq., Law Offices of Daniel E. Chavez, Petaluma, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Deborah K. Snyder, U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Aníbal Benjamin Sanchez-Garcia, a native and citizen of Guatemala, and his wife, Teresa Vargas Vargas-Sanchez, a native *755and citizen of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying Sanchez-Garcia’s application for asylum. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, *Nahrvani v. Gonzales,*399 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir.2005), we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Sanchez-Garcia failed to demonstrate past persecution because he did not testify that he was ever harmed, threatened, or even directly confronted by the Guatemalan army. *See id.*at 1153.

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s conclusion that Sanchez-Garcia failed to demonstrate his claimed fear of persecution is objectively reasonable. *See id.*at 1154.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 31.2

I, Jai Agarwal, Chief Financial Officer of CM Finance Inc certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CM Finance Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this 8th day of September 2014.



|    |  |                                    
|--- |  | -----------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    Jai
Agarwal                 
|    |  | Jai Agarwal
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies 
will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, September 13, 2017, in Multi-
Purpose Room LL-006 at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street, 
NE., Washington, DC.
    The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. (EDT) and will be open to the 
public. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will 
open at 9:00 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks. The 
meeting will be webcast on the Commission's Web site at www.sec.gov.
    On August 14, 2017, the Commission published notice of the 
Committee meeting (Release No. 33-10399), indicating that the meeting 
is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written 
comments to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued 
because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting. No earlier 
notice of this Meeting was practicable.
    The agenda for the meeting includes matters relating to rules and 
regulations affecting small and emerging companies under the federal 
securities laws.
    For further information, please contact Brent J. Fields from the 
Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

     Dated: September 8, 2017.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19445 Filed 9-8-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 34 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 34

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on any legislative day from Wednesday, 
March 23, 2016, through Friday, April 8, 2016, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until 3:30 p.m. on Monday, April 11, 2016, 
or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the House 
to reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if, in his 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.

            Passed the Senate March 17, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 34

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Providing for an adjournment of the House of Representatives.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

September 28, 2016

No. 0 4

- 16

- 00380

- CR

Richard Prieto

, Appellant

- s

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

- s

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9942 Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On September 19 , 2016

, the court reporter filed a Notification of Late Record sta ting , in part, that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee, and the appellant has failed to pay the fee or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing such record. Thereafter, we ordered appellant to file proof that payment had been made to the c ourt reporter for preparation of the reporter’s record. On September 25 , 2016

, the court reporter filed a second Notification of Late Record stating that appellant had paid the fee for preparing the reporter’s record and requesting an additional 30 days i n which to prepare and file the reporter’s record. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the reporter’s record must be filed in this Court no later than October 25, 2016.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of September, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          13,047
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     35,603
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          37,904
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            37,886
<LOANS>                                        226,862
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 330,061
<DEPOSITS>                                     291,227
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,898
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,448
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,875
<COMMON>                                         7,932
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 330,061
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,052
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,276
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   145
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,473
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,324
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,578
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,895
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (8)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,428
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,603
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,603
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.53
<LOANS-NON>                                        311
<LOANS-PAST>                                       723
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   459
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,526
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,368
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       60
<RECOVERIES>                                       223
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,621
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,621
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2020 (the “Report”) of Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mel Carlisle , the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    Mel CarlisleName:    Mel CarlisleDate: November 18, 2020
Order entered September 2 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00406

- CR

LEONEL MORENO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F09

- 12595

- P



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.

On August 18, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter’s record had not been filed. On September 1, 2015, we received the reporter’s record.

Therefore, i n the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the August 18, 2015 order

requiring findings. We ORDER the reporter’s record filed as of the date of this order.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JU STICE
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

ON REMAND

NO. 03-11-00669- CV

Tom Bennett and Jame s B. Bon ham Corp., Appellants

v. Larry Wayne G rant, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F SAN SAB A COUNTY , 33RD J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. 808 6, H ONO RAB LE GUILF ORD L. JO NES II I, J UDGE P RESIDING

S U P P L E M E N T A L M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On Aug ust 24, 2018, we issued a memorandum opinion assessing t he appropr iate amount of exemplary damag es to awa rd L arr y Way ne Gra nt ag ainst defe ndants, Tom Be nnett and J ames B. Bonha

m Corp., as direc ted by the Texas Supreme Cour t
. S ee Benne tt v. Grant , 1 525 S.W .3d 642 , 6 5 3 (T ex . 2017). Upon considering the Texas Supreme Court’s g uidance and direc tive on rema

nd, we aff irmed the trial court’s judgme nt conditioned on the filing of a remittitur

The trial court awa

rded Gra nt actua l and exemplary damag es ag ainst Be nnett and Bonha m 1 f o r ma li c io u s p r o s e c u ti o n . T h is Co u r t h a d p r e v io u s ly a f

f ir me d th e tr ia l c o u r t’ s ju d g me n t, a s r e f

o r me d by remittur, reduc ing the amount of exemplary damag es awa rded from $1,000,000 per defe ndant to $512,109 per defe ndant

. See Benne tt v. Grant , 460 S.W .3d 220, 258 (Tex. App.—Austin 2015), rev’ d & remande d in part by 525 S.W .3d 642 (Tex. 2017). The Texas Supreme Court later aff irmed this Court’s decision, except for reve rsing the exemplary -dama g es portion of ou r j u d g ment and rema nding f or a r evised re mitti tur. Benne tt v. Grant , 525 S.W .3d 642, 653 (Tex. 2017).reduc ing the awa rd of exemplary damag es as to Be nn ett by an additional $480,000 and the awa rd of exemplary damag es as to Bonha m by an additional $480,000 (re ducing the exemplary -dama g es
awa rd ag ainst eac h from $512,109 to $32,109).

I n response to our opi nion, Gra nt filed with the trial cour t a remitti tur reduc ing the

am o u nt of his exemplary -dama g es awa rd ag ainst eac h defe ndant by an additional $480,000. S ee Tex. R
. Ap p. 46.3. I n acc ordanc e with our prior opinion, we ref orm the trial court’s judgme nt to
awa rd L arr y Way ne Gra nt $ 3 2 , 1 0 9 in exemplary damag es ag ainst J ames B. Bonha m Corp. and $32 , 1 0 9 i n exemplary damag es ag ainst Tom Be nnett. As ref ormed, we aff

irm the trial court’s judgme nt on that claim and in all other r espec ts.

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field J ustice Pemberton not par ticipating Reforme d and, as Ref

ormed, Af

firmed Filed: Oc tober 9, 2018

2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 21, 2009 

s0114 

Order 

 

January 21, 2009 

136597 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136597 

 COA: 280758 

Branch CC: 91-115263-FC 

TERRY BAUDER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 119 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 119

Amending rule XXVIII of the Standing Rules of the Senate to provide for 
             timely establishment of conference committees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 26, 2015

    Mr. Merkley (for himself and Mr. Udall) submitted the following 
     resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending rule XXVIII of the Standing Rules of the Senate to provide for 
             timely establishment of conference committees.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. MOTIONS TO GO TO CONFERENCE.

    Rule XXVIII of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by 
striking paragraph 2(b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Consideration of a motion described in subparagraph (a), 
including consideration of any debatable motion or appeal in connection 
therewith, shall be limited to not more than 2 hours.''.
                                 <all>
```