43218 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Notices 

1The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 

774 (2017). The Regulations issued pursuant to the 

Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 4601–4623 

(Supp. III 2015) (available at http://

uscode.house.gov)) (‘‘EAA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’). Since 

August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the 

President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 

17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which 

has been extended by successive Presidential 

Notices, the most recent being that of August 15, 

2017 (82 FR 39005 (Aug. 16, 2017)), has continued 

the Regulations in effect under the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, 

et seq. (2012)). 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, after notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in Section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Karpenko by 

ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of 

the Regulations, Karpenko may file an 

appeal of this Order with the Under 

Secretary of Commerce for Industry and 

Security. The appeal must be filed 

within 45 days from the date of this 

Order and must comply with the 

provisions of Part 756 of the 

Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to Karpenko and shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until April 28, 2022. 

Dated: September 8, 2017. 

Karen H. Nies-Vogel, 

Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19527 Filed 9–13–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

In the Matter of: Alexey Krutilin, a/k/a 

David Powell, 16 Melioratorov Street, 

Ivanovskoe Village, Stavropol Region, 

Russia 357020; Order Denying Export 

Privileges 

On April 28, 2017, in the U.S. District 

Court for the Eastern District of New 

York, Alexey Krutilin a/k/a David 

Powell (‘‘Krutilin’’) was convicted of 

violating the International Emergency 

Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, 

et seq. (2012)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). Specifically, 

Krutilin was convicted of violating 

Section 206 of IEEPA, 50 U.S.C. 1705, 

by willfully conspiring with others to 

export from the United States to Russia 

microelectronics items controlled 

pursuant to the Export Administrations 

Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or ‘‘Regulations’’),1

and under the jurisdiction of the Bureau 

of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’), U.S. 

Department of Commerce (‘‘DOC’’), 

without the required BIS/DOC license. 

Krutilin was sentenced to time served 

and an assessment of $100.00. 

Section 766.25 of the Regulations 

provides, in pertinent part, that ‘‘[t]he 

Director of the Office of Exporter 

Services, in consultation with the 

Director of the Office of Export 

Enforcement, may deny the export 

privileges of any person who has been 

convicted of a violation of the EAA 

[Export Administration Act], the EAR, 

or any order, license, or authorization 

issued thereunder; any regulation, 

license or order issued under the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18 

U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of 

the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 

U.S.C. 783(b)); or section 38 of the Arms 

Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15 

CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of 

the EAA, 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). The denial 

of export privileges under this provision 

may be for a period of up to 10 years 

from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 

766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). In 

addition, Section 750.8 of the 

Regulations states that BIS’s Office of 

Exporter Services may revoke any BIS 

licenses previously issued pursuant to 

the Export Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’ 

or ‘‘the Act’’) or the Regulations in 

which the person had an interest at the 

time of his conviction. 

BIS has received notice of Krutilin’s 

conviction for violating IEEPA, and has 

provided notice and an opportunity for 

Krutilin to make a written submission to 

BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of 

the Regulations. BIS has not received a 

submission from Krutilin. 

Based upon my review and 

consultations with BIS’s Office of 

Export Enforcement, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny Krutilin’s export 

privileges under the Regulations for a 

period of ten (10) years from the date of 

Krutilin’s conviction. I have also 

decided to revoke all licenses issued 

pursuant to the Act or Regulations in 

which Krutilin had an interest at the 

time of his conviction. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

April 28, 2027, Alexey Krutilin a/k/a 

David Powell, with a last known 

address of 16 Melioratorov Street, 

Ivanovskoe Village, Stavropol Region, 

Russia 357020, and when acting for or 

on his behalf, his successors, assigns, 

employees, agents or representatives 

(‘‘the Denied Person’’), may not, directly 

or indirectly, participate in any way in 

any transaction involving any 

commodity, software or technology 

(hereinafter collectively referred to as 

‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from 

the United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, license exception, or export 

control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or engaging 

in any other activity subject to the 

Regulations; or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or 

from any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession or control of any item subject 

to the Regulations that has been or will 

be exported from the United States, 

including financing or other support 

activities related to a transaction 

whereby the Denied Person acquires or 

attempts to acquire such ownership, 

possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Notices 43219 

1See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 

Determination of No Shipments, and Final Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2014–2015, 82 FR 25766 (June 5, 2017) 

(Final Results). 

2See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Changed Circumstances Reviews, 82 FR 14691 

(March 22, 2017) (CCR). 

3 Id. 

1See Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab 

Emirates: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 24941 

(May 31, 2017) and accompanying Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum) (Preliminary Results). 

2For a complete description of the scope of this 

review, see Preliminary Results. 

3See Preliminary Results at 82 FR 24942. 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, after notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in Section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Krutilin by 

ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of 

the Regulations, Krutilin may file an 

appeal of this Order with the Under 

Secretary of Commerce for Industry and 

Security. The appeal must be filed 

within 45 days from the date of this 

Order and must comply with the 

provisions of Part 756 of the 

Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to Krutilin and shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until April 28, 2027. 

Dated: September 8, 2017. 

Karen H. Nies-Vogel, 

Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19528 Filed 9–13–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–970] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: Correction 

to the Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2014– 

2015 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective September 14, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3147. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 5, 

2017, the Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the final results 

of the 2014–2015 administrative review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

multilayered wood flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China (PRC).1 The 

period of review (POR) is December 1, 

2014, through November 30, 2015. The 

Department is issuing this notice to 

correct an inadvertent error in the Final 

Results. Specifically, the Department 

granted a separate rate to Guandong 

Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd. (Yihua 

Timber); however, the Department 

failed to take into account the 

completion of a changed circumstances 

review on the antidumping duty order 

on multilayered wood flooring from the 

PRC.2 In the CCR, the Department 

determined that Yihua Lifestyle 

Technology Co., Ltd. (Yihua Tech) is the 

successor-in-interest to Yihua Timber.3

As such, effective March 22, 2017, 

Yihua Tech is entitled to Yihua 

Timber’s antidumping cash deposit rate 

with respect to entries of subject 

merchandise. The Department intends 

to send updated cash deposit 

instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection. 

This correction to the final results of 

this administrative review is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(h) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended. 

Dated: September 7, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19529 Filed 9–13–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–520–804] 

Certain Steel Nails From the United 

Arab Emirates: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of No 

Shipments; 2015–2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Department) determines that certain 

steel nails (nails) from the United Arab 

Emirates (UAE) are being sold in the 

United States at less than fair value 

(LTFV). The period of review (POR) is 

May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. 

DATES: Effective September 14, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Pulongbarit or Annathea Cook, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4031 or 

(202) 482–0250, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 31, 2017, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published 

the Preliminary Results of this 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of the antidumping order on nails from 

the UAE.1 We invited parties to submit 

comments on the Preliminary Results, 

but we received no comments. The 

Department conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is certain steel nails. The product is 

currently classified under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65, and 

7317.00.75. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

description of the scope of the order 

remains dispositive.2

Analysis of Comments Received 

As noted above, we have received no 

comments regarding the Preliminary 

Results. 

Determination of No Shipments 

As noted in the Preliminary Results, 

we received no shipment claims from 

two companies subject to this 

administrative review: Oman Fasteners 

LLC (Oman Fasteners) and Overseas 

International Steel Industry LLC (OISI). 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

preliminarily determined that these 

companies had no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR.3 We 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES