alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of ClubCorp Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2016 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric L. Affeldt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods presented.








/s/ Eric L. AffeldtEric L. AffeldtChief Executive Officer and Director(principal executive officer)





Date: April 26, 2017





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ClubCorp Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by ClubCorp Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This Certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 121 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 121

  Amending rule XV of the Standing Rules of the Senate to provide for 
            consideration of a minimum number of amendments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 26, 2015

    Mr. Merkley (for himself and Mr. Udall) submitted the following 
     resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending rule XV of the Standing Rules of the Senate to provide for 
            consideration of a minimum number of amendments.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. GUARANTEED AMENDMENTS.

    Rule XV of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``6. (a) During the consideration of any bill, resolution, or other 
amendable matter, it shall be in order for the Senate to consider not 
less than 5 amendments offered by members of the majority and not less 
than 5 amendments offered by members of the minority. If a motion to 
invoke cloture under the provisions of rule XXII is presented to the 
Senate, and fewer than the 5 amendments guaranteed to each of the 
minority and the majority under this paragraph have been considered, 
then, notwithstanding the status of any pending amendments, it shall be 
in order for as many members of the majority as appropriate, and as 
many members of the minority as appropriate, to offer 1 amendment each, 
in alternating order, until in total 5 amendments offered by members of 
the majority and 5 amendments offered by members of the minority have 
been considered.
    ``(b) Amendments offered under this paragraph may only pertain to 
matter encompassed by the title of the bill, resolution, or other 
matter, except that 1 amendment offered by a member of the majority and 
1 amendment offered by a member of the minority may be exempted from 
this requirement. An amendment exempted from this requirement shall 
only be agreed to upon an affirmative vote of three-fifths of Senators 
duly chosen and sworn.
    ``(c) The majority leader and minority leader may, by mutual 
agreement, call up additional amendments under the provisions of this 
paragraph. Such additional amendments shall be offered in equal number 
by members of the majority and members of the minority, and may only 
pertain to subject matter encompassed by the title of the bill, 
resolution, or other matter.
    ``(d) Consideration by the Senate of an amendment offered under the 
provisions of this paragraph shall be limited to not more than 2 hours, 
divided equally between the majority and the minority.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7281

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WALTER LITTLE, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-270-MU, CA-98-463-3-4-MU) Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 16, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Little, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Walter Little, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Little , Nos. CR-92-270- MU; CA-98-463-3-4-MU (W.D.N.C. filed June 26, 2001; entered June 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1066
WILLIAM H. BRAMBLE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary of the Army; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-95-2698-WMN) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 30, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William H. Bramble, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. George Levi Russell, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing Appellant's civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bramble v. West , No. CA-95-2698-WMN (D. Md. Dec. 17, 1996). We further find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant'smotion for relief from judgment and various motions for reconsideration. See Collision v. International Chem. Workers Union , 34 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir. 1994); United States v. Williams , 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). Appellant's motion to issue a subpoena is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period ending October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada Jr., Sr. VP of
Finance & Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C, ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,





1)
            the
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            the
      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
    Company.





By /s/
Antonio Estrada Jr.


Antonio
Estrada Jr.


Sr. VP of
Finance & Corporate Controller and


Principal
Financial Officer


December
10, 2009
| EXHIBIT 32.1 |
|--------------|

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kronos Incorporated (the “Company”) for the period ended July 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Mark S. Ain, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul A. Lacy, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 11, 2005 |   | /s/  Mark S. Ain                          |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Mark S. Ain                               |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer                   |
|                   |   |                                      |
|                   |   |                                      |
| Date:  August 11, 2005 |   | /s/  Paul A. Lacy                         |
|                   |   | Paul A. Lacy                              |
|                   |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial |
|                   |   | and Administrative Officer                |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kronos Incorporated and will be retained by Kronos Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334


ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
dated as of June 1, 2013, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer,
PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as
Custodian, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect
to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS Series 2013-C14
(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive
Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from June 1,
   2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of its
   performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my
   supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
   respects throughout the Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
the 7th day of March 2014.



/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 13, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00626-CV

MYRTIS ALEXANDER, Appellant

V.

FIRST SHILOH BAPTIST CHURCH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-82555

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed May 31, 2012. No clerk’s record has been 

filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court 

appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On August 6, 2012, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with 

proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
2

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and McCally.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 235 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 235

 Designating September 2015 as ``National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 2015

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Nelson) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating September 2015 as ``National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 
                                Month''.

Whereas the estimated over 1,275,000 individuals in the United States who live 
        with a spinal cord injury cost society billions of dollars in health 
        care costs and lost wages;
Whereas an estimated 100,000 of those individuals are veterans who suffered a 
        spinal cord injury while serving as members of the United States Armed 
        Forces;
Whereas work-related accidents are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries;
Whereas motor vehicle crashes are the second leading cause of spinal cord 
        injuries and traumatic brain injuries;
Whereas 70 percent of all spinal cord injuries that occur in children under the 
        age of 18 are a result of a motor vehicle accident;
Whereas every 48 minutes a person will become paralyzed, underscoring the urgent 
        need to develop new neuroprotection, pharmacological, and regeneration 
        treatments to reduce, prevent, and reverse paralysis; and
Whereas increased education and investment in research are key factors in 
        improving outcomes for victims of spinal cord injuries, improving the 
        quality of life of victims, and ultimately curing paralysis: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 2015 as ``National Spinal Cord 
        Injury Awareness Month'';
            (2) supports the goals and ideals of National Spinal Cord 
        Injury Awareness Month;
            (3) continues to support research to find better treatments 
        and therapies, and a cure for spinal cord injuries;
            (4) supports clinical trials for new therapies that offer 
        promise and hope to individuals living with paralysis; and
            (5) commends the dedication of national, regional, and 
        local organizations, researchers, doctors, volunteers, and 
        people across the United States that are working to improve the 
        quality of life of people living with spinal cord injuries and 
        their families.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JTK/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WEIQIANG ZHENG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-73851

Agency No. A095-449-436

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 

Weiqiang Zheng, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order rejecting his motion to reopen

for lack of jurisdiction. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

FILED

DEC 07 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JTK/Research 2 06-73851

Reviewing de novo questions of law, Singh v. INS, 213 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.

2000), we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA properly rejected Zheng’s motion to reopen for lack of jurisdiction. 

See Matter of Mladineo, 14 I. & N. Dec. 591 (BIA 1974).

To the extent Zheng challenges the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) February 23,

2004, final order of removal, the IJ’s November 18, 2004, order denying his

motion to reopen, or the BIA’s April 26, 2005, order dismissing his appeal as

untimely, we lack jurisdiction because this petition is not timely as to those orders. 

Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY

#### The Harvard Drug Group v. Health Spectrum, Inc.

October 30, 2002

Case No. CL01-254

By Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr.

A collections officer for Plaintiff drug manufacturer and distributor testified that it shipped numerous wholesale drug orders to Defendant pharmacy on open account, for which it was not paid. Defendant pharmacy’s president testified that he did not receive the drug shipments that were billed to him. He further testified that because of his ongoing business relationship with Plaintiff, he did in fact pay a portion of the disputed charges in return for a promise from Plaintiff that it would forward proof of delivery of the drugs. Plaintiff was unable to provide proof of delivery because the documents were destroyed after eighteen months and were therefore not available. Defendant then refused to pay the alleged balance due. Plaintiff filed this lawsuit claiming that under § 8.2-606, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, Defendant’s acceptance of the goods was evidenced by its partial payment of the open account. Defendant disputes this theory, arguing instead that its payment was not intended to be acceptance of the goods, but was recognized by both parties as a condition precedent to the receipt of documentation of the proof of delivery. The Court agrees with the Defendant.

Plaintiff argues that by making its partial payment on the open account, Defendant acted in a manner “inconsistent with the seller’s ownership....” as contemplated by § 8.2-606 and, therefore, accepted the goods. In its argument, Plaintiff equates delivery of goods with acceptance of goods. The two, however, are not the same. They are separate and independent concepts. Section 8.2-606 says that after delivery of the goods, the recipient is deemed to have accepted them if he takes any of the actions listed in the statute. That *302is all that it says. Without proof of delivery, § 8.2-606 never comes into play. See *Langman*v. *Alumni Assoc. of the Univ. of Va.,*247 Va. 491, 499 (1994), for a review of the common law concepts of delivery and acceptance, which has not been changed by the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in Virginia. Section 8.2-507 also recognizes the distinction between delivery and acceptance of goods.

Instead of a question of law, the Court is faced only with a simple question of fact. Was there delivery of the drugs? If there was, then Defendant owes the whole amount requested. If there was not delivery, then Defendant is not indebted to the Plaintiff.

The Court finds, from the evidence presented *ore tenus,*that the Plaintiff failed to carry its burden of proof that delivery of the goods had occurred. Accordingly judgment shall be granted in favor of the Defendant.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15276; California Disaster Number CA-00276 Declaration of Economic Injury]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) declaration for the State of California, dated 08/30/2017. *Incident:*
                         Flooding Due to Extreme Snow Melt. *Incident Period:*
                         06/17/2017 through 06/29/2017.
 DATES: Issued on 08/30/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/30/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Fresno, Tulare *Contiguous Counties:* California: Inyo, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Mono, Monterey, San Benito The Interest Rates are: PercentBusinesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.215Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 152760. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is California. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: August 30, 2017. Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2017-19079 Filed 9-7-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
JOSVMR^

££i±^t^^Jlcu$j= UAMS- : l4uUA*Le .v. STATS- of- ia<A*>

AERel Lats ~-Cgu$£ - l^MHBM-l?i^^0J-^±^^OJ-0-iS^C^

jL lo.mSk&iA - IT MAY^ C&.N.ce_BJsL

S-o pl£j^£ HeL_P—M£ T-o B,£ASx XL

My. /u>am£> is }jijisi&- Le ,. X£xx# a±^££>2>zq

-espouse * qaj v~>t- ir H^ <LlsT&r Mai jam

js?f Tine S^ $k^ C*+/ AssisT HE C^FFfJIo^^t]

/4lVp MA\L&*L. L&S—MoTintf izJ^PE-NfSDjz Ajlp Ttfey

pil.dL Mf? rR t /U£££ co>)c for ax£aLirfo a/AL , TiMB

-r-r M«sT S£ piLe /W, M€ Ct\?eaLLo+Jr\

(Met-?- H£) — ,- #juq£6tea

C&ufJ u-ou CLVJLS H-5 6L&- cLoj^- jz^xTSNS'JoHgE'
s&^_r

J o ^

£~ & %

k p ^

*M % M

H ;j 3

2?

0

0

sD

£

I-

^ Q

•a.

, UN

so ^

\0

V.L

0

y

3

0

sj

£

X

0

CL

a:

U.

so

o

rV-

<

<

U.

H

o

m 3"

m

to

8

1

w

o

D

rrCO

_J ai

< z

£tf> cc

£< in .a.

Q<2l CT3 sj;

LUU^Ifc- C\l

OC£X

«>• t'C

r~4 X

CEO- IS3 CL

g

CO ^

cc a:

QC X ill

0 —1 iZ 0

LL3

O

yj