alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

October 21, 2005

Ms. Michelle E. Robberson

Cooper & Scully, P.C.

900 Jackson Street, Suite 100

Dallas, TX 75202

Honorable Mackey K. Hancock

99th District Court

P. O. Box 10536

Lubbock, TX 79408-3536

Mr. Joe L. Lovell

Lovell Lovell Newsom & Isern, L.L.P.

112 West 8th Ave, Suite 1000

Amarillo, TX 79101-2314

Honorable  William  Charles  Sowder

99th District Court

P.O. Box 10536

Lubbock, TX 79408

Mr. Dicky Grigg

Spivey Grigg Kelly & Knisely

48 East Avenue

Suite 100

Austin, TX 78701-4320

Mr. Paul S. Colley

Paul Colley Jr. & Associates 

48 East Avenue 

Austin, TX 78701

RE:Case Number:  05-0814

Court of Appeals Number:  07-05-00033-CV

Trial Court Number:  2003-522,597

Style:IN RE  COVENANT MEDICAL CENTER AND JOHN EATON, L.V.N.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas granted in part and denied in part the Motion for Immediate Temporary Relief and issued the enclosed abatement order in the above referenced-case.  The relators’ request for stay is denied.  (Justice Johnson not sitting)

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 05-0814Page 2**
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 290 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that any protocol to, or other agreement 

regarding, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 

of 1992, negotiated at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris will be considered a treaty requiring the advice and 

consent of the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 20, 2015 

Mr. PAUL (for himself and Mr. ROBERTS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that any protocol to, 

or other agreement regarding, the United Nations 

Framework Convention on Climate Change of 1992, negotiated at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change 

Conference in Paris will be considered a treaty requiring 

the advice and consent of the Senate. 

Whereas the 105th Congress passed S. Res. 98, which required the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change of 1992 to receive 

Senate advice and consent prior to ratification: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that any 

2 protocol to, or other agreement regarding, the United NaVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:03 Oct 20, 2015 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR290.IS SR290

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 290 IS 

1 tions Framework Convention on Climate Change of 1992, 

2 negotiated at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change 

3 Conference in Paris will be considered a treaty requiring 

4 the advice and consent of the Senate. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 26, 2014

s1119 

# Order

Clerk November 26, 2014

150142

_________________________________________

In re ARS, Minor.

_________________________________________

PHILLIP SCHNEBELT and PAMELA

SCHNEBELT,

Petitioners

- Appellants,

v SC: 150142

COA: 318638

Shiawassee CC Family Division:

13

- 003727

- AF

DEREK MUSALL,

Respondent

- Appellee,

and

KAYLEIGH MARIE SCHNEBELT,

Respondent

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1).

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order,

addressing: (1) whether the respondent father demonstrated adequate “good cause” under

Section 25 of the Adoption Code, MCL 710.25( 2), for the adjournment of the adoption

proceeding, see In re MKK , 286 Mich App 546 (2009); (2) whether the respondent

adequately demonstrated that he had “provided substantial and regular support or care in

accordance with [his] ability to provide such support or care for the mother during

pregnancy or for either mother or child after the child’s birth during the 90 days before

notice of the hearing was served upon him,” MCL 710.39(2); and (3) whether the trial

court gave adequate consideration to the le gislative mandate that all adoption proceedings

“be considered to have the highest priority . . . .” MCL 710.25(1).
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Steven D. Barnhart, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FTD Companies, Inc.; and

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 30, 2019

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Steven D. Barnhart                                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Steven D. Barnhart                                     |
|   |   | *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 20, 2011 

Order 

 

September 20, 2011 

138952(73) 

MYRIAM VELEZ, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 138952 

v COA: 281136 

Wayne CC: 04-402161-NH 

MARTIN TUMA, M.D., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellant for extension to 

August 25, 2011 of the time for filing his brief and appendix is considered and it is 

granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,846
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,411,155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,417,001
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,417,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          511,845
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,905,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,417,001
<SALES>                                             64
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    64
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     64
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        64
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                        
<ARTICLE>                    5
                              
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                1,092,354
<SECURITIES>                            125,550
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,321,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                           1,695,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      4,508,828
<PP&E>                                  656,450
<DEPRECIATION>                          351,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        5,883,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   744,608
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                             298,534
<COMMON>                                 37,782
<OTHER-SE>                            4,790,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          5,883,909
<SALES>                               1,996,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,996,589
<CGS>                                 1,355,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           756,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        6,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (79,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (79,786)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (79,786)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0
        
 

</TABLE>
# The Attorney General ofTexas July 25, 1979 MARK WHITE Attorney General

Honorable BiIlStewart, P.E. Executive Director Texas Air Control Board 8520Shoal Creek Boulevard Austin, Texas 18758 Opinion No.MW- 32 Re: Whether a proposed procedure of the Air Control Board violates the Open Meetings Act. Dear Mr.Stewart: You inform us ihat the Texas Air Control Board may adopt a new procedure for requesting the Attorney General to institute civil suits on its behalf. You wish toknow whether the proposed procedure would violate the Open Meetings Act, V.T.C.S. art. 6252-17. Article 4477-5, V.T.C.S., provides inpart: At the request of the board, or the executive secretary Iexecutive director] when authorized by the board, the attorney general shall institute and conduct a suit inthe name ofthe State of Texas for injunctive relief or torecover the civil penalty, opfor both injunctive relief and penalty.

... Sec. 4$J2(b). The proposed procedure would require the executive director, except in emergencies, to notify all board members of his intention to request the Attorney General to bring acivil suit for violations ofthe Clean Air Act or board regulations or orders. Within ten days ofnotification, any board member may request in writing that the matter be placed on the agenda ofthe next board meeting. Ifthree ormore members ofthe board so request, the matter will beplaced on the agenda. Otherwise, the executive director would forward his request to the Attorney General without further board action. See Kettlewell v. Hot Mix, Inc., 566 S.W.2d 663, 668 (Tex. Civ. App. - H%iston [lst Dist.1 1978, no writ) (Air Control Board may delegate duties tothe executive director and other employees). Your questions concern the application of the Open Meetings Actsto this procedure. The Texas Open Meetings Act applies to deliberation among a quorum of members of a governmental body. Sees. l(a), 2(a). Wedo not believe an individual member of a board violates the Open Meetings Act when he communicates in writing to the executive director indicating that

p. 97Honorable BillStewart, P.E. - Page Two m-32 1

he wishes to have an item placed onthe agenda and sends acopy to other members ofthe board. Ofcourse, the document requesting that an item be placed on the agenda would ordinarily be available under the Open Records Act. V.T.C.S. art. 6252-17a. See also Texas OpenMeetings Act, V.T.C.S. art. 6252-17, S4(b). SUMMARY A procedure of the Air Control Board permitting individual members to write to the executive director indicating their desire to place an item on the agenda of a future meeting would not violate the Open Meetings Act.

# &&

MARK WHITE Attorney General ofTexas JOHN W.PAINTER, JR. First Ass&ant Attorney General TEDL.HARTLEY Executive Assiitant Attorney General Prepared bySusan Garrison Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE C.Robert Heath, Chairman DavidB.Brooks Susan Garrison Rick Gilpin William GReid Bruce Youngblood

p. 98
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 247 

Commemorating and honoring the actions of President Harry S. Truman 

and the crews of the Enola Gay and the Bockscar in using the atomic 

bomb to bring World War II to an end. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 5, 2015 

Mr. ISAKSON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating and honoring the actions of President Harry 

S. Truman and the crews of the Enola Gay and the 

Bockscar in using the atomic bomb to bring World War 

II to an end. 

Whereas, during World War II, in 1945, war in the Pacific 

Theater between the United States and Japan had entered its fourth year; 

Whereas Allied military commanders were preparing to invade Japan; 

Whereas President Harry S. Truman made the tactical decision to use the newly developed atomic bomb against 

Japan instead of invading Japan; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 247 IS 

Whereas, on August 6, 1945, the crew of the Enola Gay, 

under the command of Colonel Paul W. Tibbets, Jr., 

dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan; and 

Whereas, on August 9, 1945, the crew of the Bockscar, under 

the command of Major Charles W. Sweeney, dropped an 

atomic bomb on Nagasaki, Japan: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commemorates and honors the courageous 

3 decision of President Harry S. Truman to use atom4 ic bombs against Japan to bring an end to World 

5 War II; and 

6 (2) commemorates and honors the courageous 

7 actions by the crews of the Enola Gay and the 

8 Bockscar in carrying out missions against Hiro9 shima and Nagasaki, respectively, that accomplished 

10 tactical terminal objectives and saved a countless 

11 number of lives of citizens of the United States. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 32

                             Rule 1350 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Community Central
Bank Corporation (the "Corporation") that the Quarterly Report of the
Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Corporation as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial
statements included in such report.


Dated: November 14, 2005                By: /S/ DAVID A. WIDLAK
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Widlak;
                                            President and CEO
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: November 14, 2005                By: /S/ RAY T. COLONIUS
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ray T. Colonius;
                                            Treasurer
                                            (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                            Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 277 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 277

Recognizing the month of October 2015 as ``National Principals Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 5, 2015

  Mr. Franken (for himself, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Cochran, Mrs. 
 Feinstein, and Mr. Durbin) submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the month of October 2015 as ``National Principals Month''.

Whereas the National Association of Secondary School Principals and the National 
        Association of Elementary School Principals have declared the month of 
        October 2015 to be ``National Principals Month'';
Whereas principals are educational visionaries, instructional and assessment 
        leaders, disciplinarians, community builders, budget analysts, 
        facilities managers, and administrators of legal and contractual 
        obligations;
Whereas principals work collaboratively with teachers and parents to develop and 
        implement a clear mission, high curriculum standards, and performance 
        goals;
Whereas principals create school environments that facilitate great teaching and 
        learning and continuous school improvement;
Whereas the vision, actions, and dedication of principals provide the mobilizing 
        force behind any school reform effort; and
Whereas the celebration of National Principals Month would honor elementary 
        school, middle school, and high school principals, and recognize the 
        importance of principals in ensuring that every child has access to a 
        high-quality education: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the month of October 2015 as ``National 
        Principals Month''; and
            (2) honors the contribution of principals in the elementary 
        schools, middle schools, and high schools of the United States 
        by supporting the goals and ideals of National Principals 
        Month.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Roy D. THACKER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10059

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 30, 2008.

Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Roy D. Thacker, Jr., raises arguments that are foreclosed by *United States v. Hinson,*429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 2005), which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, *663and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 13.1





PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report of Dynagas LNG Partners LP (the "Partnership") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tony Lauritzen, Principal Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.








Date: March 24, 2014








/s/Tony Lauritzen


Tony Lauritzen


Chief Executive Officer and Director