alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 173 (Friday, September 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19066]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 4, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director, 
Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. Carpenter Bank Partners, Inc., CCFW, Inc., Carpenter Fund 
Manager GP, LLC, Carpenter Fund Management Company, LLC, Carpenter 
Community BancFund, L.P., Carpenter Community BancFund-A, L.P., and 
Carpenter Community BancFund-CA, L.P., all of Irvine, California: to 
acquire approximately 11.2 percent of Pacific Premier Bancorp and 
indirectly acquire Pacific Premier Bank, both of Irvine, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 5, 
2017.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-19066 Filed 9-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
| logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust ServicesMAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

RBS Commercial Funding Inc. 

600 Washington Boulevard

Stamford, Connecticut 06901

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C15, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-C15

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

March 3, 2015

 

/s/ Brian Smith 

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
|------------------------|
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Nos. 1D2022-3580

 1D2022-3581

(Consolidated for disposition)

_____________________________

EVAN LEE JOINER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gulf County.

Devin D. Collier, Judge.

April 30, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and LEWIS and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristie Regan, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 7 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 7

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO PRESENT 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO WORLD WAR II MEMBERS OF 
              DOOLITTLE TOKYO RAIDERS.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on April 15, 2015, for a ceremony to present 
the Congressional Gold Medal to the World War II members of the 
Doolittle Tokyo Raiders, collectively, in recognition of the military 
service and exemplary record of the Doolittle Tokyo Raiders during 
World War II.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the Senate March 12, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. CON. RES. 7

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to the World War 
               II members of the Doolittle Tokyo Raiders.
```
NO. 07-04-0051-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D OCTOBER 29, 2004

______________________________ MARCIA A. GILLER D/B/A AME HOME HEALTH C ARE, APPELLANT V. EXCEL FINANCIAL CO., APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2001- 592,053; HONORAB LE PAUL A LANEH ART, JUD GE

_______________________________ Before QU INN and R EAVIS an d CAMPBE LL, JJ. MEMORAND UM OPINION Appellant

Marci a A. G iller d/b/a AME Home Health Care filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellee Excel Financi al Co. i n itsaction to recov er on a commercial equipment lease after Home Health Care defaulted. The clerk’s recor d and reporter’s record have both been filed. Home Heal th Care’s brief was2

due to be filed no later than June 28, 2004 , but has y et to be filed, and no motion for ext ension of time was filed. By letter dated October 7, 2004, this Court notif ied Hom e Health Care of the defect and directed it to file a response reasonab ly expl aining t he failu re to file a brief with a showing that Excel Financial has not been significa ntly injured by the delayby Octobe r 18, 200 4. The C ourt also noted th at failur

e to file a response might result in dismissal of the appeal pursuant to Rule 38.8 of the TexasRules of Appellate Procedure. Home Health Care did not respond and the brief remains outstanding. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution and failure to comp ly with a di rective of this Co urt. See Tex. R. App. P. 3 8.8(a)(1) and 42.3 (b).
Don H. Reavis Justice
EX-35.3
(logo) ncb


2011 Crystal Drive
Suite 800
Arlington, Virginia 22202

TEL  (703) 302-8000
TOLL (800) 955-9622
FAX  (703) 647-3460

February 26,2014

RBS Commercial Funding, Inc. as Depositor
Attn:  Jim Barnard
600 Washington Blvd.
Stamford, CT 06901

RE:      Annual Statement as to Compliance
         WFRBS 2013 C15

Dear Sir/Madam:


In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in
connection with the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2013-C15, as an authorized officer of NCB, FSB (the
"NCB Master Servicer"), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereof that:


a.  A review of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the
    preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Pooling and
    Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.


b.  To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer
    Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material
    respects throughout the year.


Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate
cover on or before March 31,2014.



Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann
Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance
NCB,FSB

www.ncb.coop

Banking & Financial Services
Cooperative Expansion
Economic Development


NCB refers to National Consumer Cooperative Bank and its subsidiaries (primarily
NCB Financial Corporation and its subsidiary NCB, FSB), its affiliated
non-profit corporation, NCB Capital Impact, and also NCB Community Works,LLC,
which is jointly owned by NCB and NCB Capital Impact. Each is a separate
corporation within the NCB Financial Group.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

VMR ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

BUILDZ, LLC f/k/a PRECISION CONSTRUCTION, LLC,

a North Carolina limited liability company,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1103

[October 7, 2021]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. CACE 18-13943.

Vincent F. Vaccarella and Dylan E. Goldberg of Vincent F. Vaccarella, 

P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Daniel S. Rosenbaum and Dina L. Rosenbaum of Rosenbaum PLLC, 

West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 filed on the date
hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ John R. Troka, Jr.John R. Troka, Jr.Interim Chief Financial Officer
#### Bassett *v.*Malone and another.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

December 27, 1880.

Injunction — When not Dissolved.

Where defendant is using- the infringing machine for purposes in respect 1 o which the plaintiff has an exclusive right under his patent, an injunction will not be dissolved on motion founded on the non-joinder of a party.

*J. B. Staples,*for plaintiff.

*R. B. Dawson,*for Malone.

Blatchford, C. J.

I see no ground, on the merits of the case, for dissolving the injunction. It is not clear that on the terms of the contract between Loft and the plaintiff the suit is not well brought in the name of the plaintiff alone. But at all events, by tlie terms of that contract, the plaintiff has a right to use Loft’s name, in conjunction with his own, in bringing suits, and it is not necessary to obtain Loft’s consent or signature for each suit. The plaintiff may join Loft with himself as co-plaintiff, and may'amend his bill to that effect. This had better bo done, and an order to that effect will be entered. It sufficiently appears .that Malone is using the infringing machine for purposes in respect to which the plaintiff has an exclusive right under the patent.

The motion to dissolve the injunction is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2335 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2335

  To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2011

 Mrs. Noem (for herself, Mr. Kline, Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Cole, 
Mr. Paul, and Mr. McClintock) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYER.

    Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 152) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or any enterprise or 
        institution owned and operated by an Indian tribe and located 
        on its Indian lands,'' after ``subdivision thereof''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(15) The term `Indian tribe' means any Indian tribe, 
        band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group or community 
        which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and 
        services provided by the United States to Indians because of 
        their status as Indians.
            ``(16) The term `Indian' means any individual who is a 
        member of an Indian tribe.
            ``(17) The term `Indian lands' means--
                    ``(A) all lands within the limits of any Indian 
                reservation;
                    ``(B) any lands title to which is either held in 
                trust by the United States for the benefit of any 
                Indian tribe or individual or held by any Indian tribe 
                or individual subject to restriction by the United 
                States against alienation; and
                    ``(C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma that are 
                within the boundaries of a former reservation (as 
                defined by the Secretary of the Interior) of a 
                federally recognized Indian tribe.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 42938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19397]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1


Income Taxes

CFR Correction

0
 In Title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1 (Sec. Sec.  
1.301 to 1.400) revised as of April 1, 2017, on page 598, in Sec.  
1.381(c)(2)-1, paragraph (d) is removed.

[FR Doc. 2017-19397 Filed 9-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
#### BONDPRO CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SIEMENS POWER GENERATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-3077.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Oct. 19, 2006.

Peter M. Reinhardt (argued), Menomonie, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

David T. Schultz (argued), Maslon, Edelman, Borman & Brand, Minneapolis, MN, for DefendanF-Appellee.

*563Before POSNER, EASTERBROOK, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.

On Order To Show Cause

PER CURIAM.

In our opinion deciding this appeal, we said:

> Our Circuit Rule 28(a)(1) requires that the jurisdictional statement in a diversity suit name the states of which the parties are citizens. In violation of this rule, the jurisdictional statement in the plaintiffs brief fails to indicate the citizenship of the parties (both of which are corporations); it says only that they are “citizens of different states.” The defendant’s brief, compounding the violation, states that the plaintiffs jurisdictional statement is complete and correct.

463 F.3d 702, 703 (7th Cir.2006).

We ordered the parties to show cause why they should not be sanctioned for violating our rule. The rule is clear and serves the important purpose of assuring that the court does not exceed its jurisdiction. The parties apologized for the violation but suggested no excuse, let alone justification. Violations of the rule are distressingly common despite frequent warnings, see *Hart v. Terminex Int’l,*336 F.3d 541, 543 (7th Cir.2003); *Meyerson v. Showboat Marina Casino Partnership,*312 F.3d 318 (7th Cir.2003) (per curiam); *Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Eastern Atlantic Ins. Co.,*260 F.3d 742, 747-48 (7th Cir. 2001) (“we have warned litigants about the precise pattern observed here — a patently erroneous jurisdictional statement by the appellant, and a patently erroneous statement by the appellee that the appellant’s jurisdictional statement is complete and correct”); *Professional Service Network, Inc. v. American Alliance Holding Co.,*238 F.3d 897, 902-03 (7th Cir.2001). The time has come to impose an exemplary public sanction in the hope of deterring further violations.

It is therefore Ordered that counsel for the plaintiff — Peter M. Reinhardt, Nicholas J. Vivian, and Bakke Norman, S.C.— jointly, and counsel for the defendant— David T. Schultz, Teresa J. Kimker, Mark J. Girouard, and Halleland Lewis Nilan & Johnson, P.A. — also jointly, shall pay to the court as a sanction for violating Rule 28 the sum of $1,000.
Exhibit 31

SEMT 2013-8

 

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

 

I, Jeremy P. Strom, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-8 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (“CoreLogic”), American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, “Assurant”), Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, CitiMortgage, Inc. as Master Servicer, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as Custodian, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.

 

Date: March 30, 2022

 

 

/s/ Jeremy. P Strom

Signature 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, William S. Creekmuir, as Chief Financial Officer of Simmons Company (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

            (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
      ended March 27, 2004 (the "Report"), being filed with the U.S. Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date:  May 12, 2004                 /s/ William S. Creekmuir
                                    --------------------------------
                                    Name: William S. Creekmuir
                                    Title:   Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simmons Company and will be retained by Simmons Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.