alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 21 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 21

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the 
                       flag of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2015

   Mr. Vitter (for himself, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Graham, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 
 Grassley, and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the 
                       flag of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within 7 years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical 
desecration of the flag of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2129

YEHEYIS NEGEY GETACHEW,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A29-704-576)

Submitted: January 18, 2000 Decided: March 16, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allan Ebert, LAW OFFICES OF ALLAN EBERT, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Civil

Division, Karen Fletcher Torstenson, Assistant Director, Russell

J.E. Verby, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 This section has been repealed by the Illegal Immigration

Reform Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub. L. No.

104-208, 110 Stat. 3009. However, because Getachew was in deportation proceedings on the effective date of the Act, the amendments

do not apply. IIRIRA § 309(c)(1).

2 Section 306(b) of the IIRIRA, repealed 8 U.S.C.

§ 1105a(a)(4), replacing it with 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(b)(4) (West

1999). Again, because Getachew was in deportation proceedings

before the effective date of the IIRIRA, the transitional rules

provide for judicial review under § 1105a(a)(4) as it existed

before enactment of the IIRIRA. IIRIRA § 309(c)(4).

2

PER CURIAM:

Yeheyis Negey Getachew seeks review of an order of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing an appeal from the decision of the immigration judge and denying him political asylum, 8

U.S.C.A. § 1158 (West 1999), and withholding of deportation, 8

U.S.C. § 1253(h) (1994).1 Getachew is a native and citizen of

Ethiopia.

We conclude that the decision of the Board is supported by

“reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole. . . .” 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) (1994).2 Therefore, we deny Getachew’s petition for review. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19197]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, October 12, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-
317-3332.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be held Thursday, October 12, 
2017, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is 
invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for 
consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent 
to participate must be made with Otis Simpson. For more information 
please contact Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332, or write 
TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW., Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 
or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda 
will include various IRS issues. Otis Simpson. For more information 
please contact Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332, or write 
TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW., Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 
or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda 
will include various IRS issues.
    The agenda will include a discussion on various letters, and other 
issues related to written communications from the IRS.

    Dated: September 4, 2017.
Antoinette Ross,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2017-19197 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2023_12_1_12_35" style="width: 95%;"><caption><span class="tableTitle">Chart 4. U.S. business response to the COVID-19 pandemic increase, in telework, in percent, 2021</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; min-width: 80px;" rowspan="1" scope="col">Pandemic telework impact</th>
<th style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;" scope="col">Total</th>
<th style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;" scope="col">Healthcare and social assistance<br />(NAICS 62)</th>
<th style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;" scope="col">Child daycare centers<br />(NAICS 6244)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>Increased telework for some or all employees</p>
</th>
<td>34.5</td>
<td>38.9</td>
<td>32.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>Increased telework and expect the increase to continue when the COVID-19 pandemic is over</p>
</th>
<td>60.2</td>
<td>59.5</td>
<td>10.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2023_12_1_12_35_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="4">
<p>Note: NAICS = North American Industry Classification System.</p>
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p></p>
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 28 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Secretary of Agriculture relating to inspection of 

fish of the order Siluriformes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Sec4 retary of Agriculture relating to ‘‘Mandatory Inspection 

5 of Fish of the Order Siluriformes and Products Derived 

6 From Such Fish’’ (80 Fed. Reg. 75590; December 2, 

7 2015), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the Senate May 25, 2016. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 28 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapSiluriformes. ing to inspection of fish of the order submitted by the Secretary of Agriculture relat- ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18369]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[EL17-33-000]


Great River Energy; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on July 25, 2017, Great River Energy submitted a 
supplement to its December 29, 2016 updated revenue requirement for 
Reactive Power Service provided under Schedule 2 of the Midwest ISO 
Tariff.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aaeceff8e9e5c4c6c3c4cff9dfdadac5d8deeacccfd8c984cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ed8dbccddd1f0f2f7f0fbcdebeeeef1eceadef8fbecfdb0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September 5, 2017.

    Dated: August 24, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-18369 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 4.18




LEASE FINANCING AGREEMENT







This Lease Financing Agreement is entered into by and between HEWITT PETROLEUM, INC., 15 W. South Temple, Suite 1050, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (“HPI”), and JUPITER LP, 1941 Ridgehill Drive, Bountiful, Utah 84010 (“Lender”). The parties agree as follows:


 


1.      Loan.  Lender agrees to loan the total sum of $37,500 to HPI to acquire the 785 acre Jackson Trust Lease in Juab County, Utah (the “Lease”) as follows:


 



	 	
a.  

	
$17,500 advanced upon execution hereof for lease acquisition and legal fees; and








	 	
b.  

	
$20,000 advanced upon final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction in favor of HPI that title to the oil & gas rights belongs to the Jackson Trust not US Gypsum Co. and that HPI's lease is therefore valid, for final payment of lease acquisition costs.












2.      Terms. The loan shall be due and payable in eighteen (18) months from each advance and shall bear interest at the fixed rate of 5.0% per annum. As additional consideration for the loan, HPI shall assign to Lender a 2.0% overriding royalty (ORR) in the Lease. The Loan shall be convertible into HPI's Common Stock at any time, or from time to time in whole or in part, at the election of Lender upon three (3) days written notice to HPI, at the price of $0.50 per share. Upon conversion, Lender will execute a subscription and HPI will issue a certificate. HPI hereby grants unto Lender a ratchet provision for a price adjustment after HPI stock becomes tradable in a public market. The ratchet provision shall be guaranteed to the price of $0.25 per share.







3.      Right of First Refusal.  HPI grants to Lender a right of first refusal to finance other lease acquisitions that involve the US Gypsum Co. upon the same loan terms hereof, including the same ORR assignment. The interest rate and convertible stock price will be subject to adjustment based upon market conditions. Lender shall have five (5) business days after receipt of written notice from HPI to elect to finance any such lease as set forth above.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the date below.


 


DATED: October 22, 2010




 



	HEWITT PETROLEUM, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	
By:

	
/s/ Douglas C. Hewitt

	  
	  	
Douglas C. Hewitt, President/CEO

	  
	  	  	  
	
JUPITER, LP

	  
	
By:

	
/s/ Scott West

	  
	  	
Scott West, General Partner
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 23 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 23

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 
   Agency relating to ``Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas 
  Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: 
                  Electric Utility Generating Units''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, 
Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility 
Generating Units'' (published at 80 Fed. Reg. 64510 (October 23, 
2015)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate November 17, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 23

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 
   Agency relating to ``Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas 
  Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: 
                  Electric Utility Generating Units''.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1
                     INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of
June 30, 1998, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations
for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, and the
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 1997 and 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical review
procedures to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an
audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which
will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Collaborative Clinical Research,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then
ended, not presented herein, and in our report dated January 30, 1998, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In
our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1997 is fairly stated, in all
material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it
has been derived.

Cleveland, Ohio                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP
July 20, 1998
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK

#### Michlen F. Robinson v. Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc., and Curtis Anderson

January 13, 2003

Case No. (Law) CL02-4991

By Judge Charles D. Griffith, Jr.

The Defendant, Curtis Anderson, has filed a Demurrer to Count V of the Motion for Judgment, claiming that the Plaintiff has not sufficiently pleaded a cause of action for negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress. In support of his Demurrer, Defendant Anderson cites *Russo*v. *White,*241 Va. 23 (1991), and *Hughes v. Moore,*214 Va. 27 (1973).

In ruling upon a Demurrer, the Court must accept all reasonable, factual inferences fairly and justly drawn from the facts alleged in the pleading. However, a Demurrer does not admit the correctness of the pleader’s conclusions of law. *Russo v. White,*241 Va. 23, 24 (1991).

Virginia has recognized the existence of intentional infliction of emotion distress. *Russo,*241 Va. at 26. However, there must be some accompanying objective physical injury for such a claim to lie. In reviewing the Motion for Judgment, the Court finds no allegation by the plaintiff of any resulting physical injury as a result of the claimed intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff cites the Court to paragraphs 10 and 11 of the Motion for Judgment wherein the plaintiff alleges physical and verbal assaultive behavior by the defendant. However, in Count V, wherein the plaintiff alleges negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff does not allege any physical injury that accompanies or results from such conduct that the plaintiff relies upon in support of that tort claim.

*453Wherefore, the Court grants the defendant Anderson’s Demurrer and dismisses Count V of the Motion for Judgment as to all defendants. It is so ordered.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification by the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Angela Collette, certify pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of UBL Interactive, Inc. (the “Company”) for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                              |        |                                       |        |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |                                  |   |
| Date: February 27, 2018 |   | /s/ Angela Collette                   |   |
|                         |   | Angela Collette, Receiver             |   |
|                         |   | Chief and Principal Executive Officer |   |

 

A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 20, 2024

No. 04-23-00779-CV

IN RE TEXAS MEDICAL LIABILITY TRUST

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we conditionally grant Relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus.

We ORDER the trial court to do the following within thirty days of the date of this order:

(1) vacate its August 10, 2023 Order Regarding the Deposition of Barbara C. Barnett, and

(2) render an order quashing the deposition of Barbara C. Barnett.

 

After the trial court vacates its August 10, 2023 order, our August 24, 2023 stay will be moot.

We tax costs of court against David J. Freeman, M.D. Our writ will issue only if we are 

informed that the trial court has failed to comply with this order. 

It is so ORDERED on March 20, 2024.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of March, 2024.

_____________________________

Tommy Stolhandske, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022CI11266, styled David Friedman, M.D. v. Texas Medical Liability 

Trust, pending in the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez presiding.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form
10-Q  for  the  period ending October 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof, I, Arthur L. Smith, Chief Executive
Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C, ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,

1)   the  Report  complies  with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
     the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2)   the  information  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
     the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the  Company.

By /s/ Arthur L. Smith
Arthur L. Smith
Chief Executive Officer
December 15, 2003




<PAGE>