alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                      AWARD SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

                    (In thousands except per share amounts)
                                  (Unaudited)

                                                               Three months
                                                                   ended
                                                                  March 31,
                                                              ----------------
                                                               1997      1996
                                                              ------    ------
Weighted average common shares                                 6,573     5,248
Weighted average common equivalent shares                        910       828
                                                              ------    ------
Total weighted average common and common equivalent shares     7,483     6,076
                                                              ======    ======
Net income                                                    $  926    $  386
                                                              ======    ======
Net income per share                                          $ 0.12    $ 0.06
                                                              ======    ======


NET INCOME PER SHARE

    Net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common
and common equivalent shares, when dilutive, from stock options and warrants 
(using the treasury stock method). Pursuant to a Securities and Exchange 
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin, common and common equivalent shares (using
the treasury stock method and the public offering price) issued by the Company 
within 12 months prior to the Company's initial public offering filing have been
included in the calculation as if they were outstanding for all periods through 
the effective date of the Company's initial public offering.



                                     23
Exhibit 31.3


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John L. Higgins, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: November 1, 2017





/s/ John L. HigginsJohn L. HigginsPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Bobby L. SCOTT, Melissa Thompson, Individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ING CLARION PARTNERS, LLC, Individually and d.b.a. Gables Residential Trust, Gables Residential Services, Inc., Lions Gables Realty Limited Partnership, Gables Gp, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-12407.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 23, 2008.

Halsey G. Knapp, Jr., Mary Lillian Walker, Kevin H. Hudson, Foltz Martin, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Steven G. Brody, McKee Nelson LLP, New York, NY, Robert P. Hein, Fowler, Hein, Cheatwood, Passino & Williams, P.A., Dan S. McDevitt, Justin Clay Jeffries, King & Spalding, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and MOORE,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable K. Michael Moore, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Appellants Bobby L. Scott and Melissa Thompson, proceeding individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, have not shown any reversible error in the district court’s orders dated October 31, 2006 and May 7, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms those orders.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 10.1 


 






Joint Venture Contract and Operating Agreement dated
November 8, 2011, between the Registrant and PEMCO, LLC.


 


 


The accompanying PDF document contains the signed operating agreement.
ORTHOLOGIC CORP.

               STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER
              WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


     
                                                         Three Months Ended    
                                                              March 31,        
                                                       ------------------------
                                                           1997        1996 (1)
                                                       ------------------------
                                                                               
                                                                               
Net income (loss)                                      $    (273)     $   935  
                                                                               
Common shares outstanding at end of period                25,069       19,682  
                                                                               
Adjustment to reflect weighted average for                                     
shares issued during the period                              (31)        (164) 
                                                                               
Adjustment to reflect assumed exercise                                         
of outstanding stock options                                --          1,278  
                                                       ----------------------  
                                                                               
Weighted average number of common shares                                       
outstanding                                               25,038       20,796  
                                                       ======================  
                                                                               
                                                                               
 Net income (loss) per weighted average                                        
 number of common shares outstanding                   $   (0.01)     $  0.04  
                                                       ======================  
                                                       
 (1)    The share and per  share  amounts  have been  adjusted  to  reflect  the
        Company's  2-for-1  stock  split  effected  in the form of a 100%  stock
        dividend in June 1996.
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT A ugus t 3, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O RT H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 14733 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 5 - 0 0 0 0 6 - CR- 5 - M CR U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s A U R E L I O M A R T I N E Z - A B U N D I Z , a .k .a . A u r e lio M artin e z - A b u n d e z , a .k .a . J o s e M artin e z , e t a l., D e f e n d an t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( A u gu s t3, 2006) B efo re C A RN E S , P R Y O Ran dH IL L , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E RC U R I A M:2

G w e n d o ly n S p iv e y , ap p o in te dc o u n s e l f o rA u r e lio M artin e z - A b u n d iz in th is appeal , has m ov ed t o w i thd raw fr om further r epre se nt at i on of the appel l antand h as f i l e d abr i e f

pur s uantt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 49 3 (19 67 ). O ur i nd ependentre vi ew of the ent i re re cord revea l s that co u n sel ’ s assessm en to f th e rel at i v e m eri to f th e ap p eal i s co rrect . B ecau se in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls n o ar g u ab le is s u e s o f m e r it, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and M art i ne z - A bundi z ’ s c onvi c t i on and res ul t i ng se nt ence ar e A FFI R M ED .
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wuiteb ~tate~ <!Court of §ppeal~ 

for tbe jf eberal <!Circuit 

JAMES L. BOUCHARD, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

Respondent. 

2011-3125 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in case no. AT1221100506-W-1. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

The Department of Veterans Affairs moves to reform 

the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent. James L. Bouchard opposes. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The 

employing agency is designated as the respondent when 

the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. We 
BOUCHARD v. MSPB 2 

determine that the Board should be designated as the 

respondent. 

Accordingly, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. The revised official caption is 

reflected above. 

JUL 2? 2011 

Date 

cc: Beverly Bates, Esq. 

s20 

Sarah A. Murray, Esq. 

Calvin Morrow, Esq. 

FOR THE COURT 

lsI Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

FILED '.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEOERAl CIRCUIT 

JUL 27 2011 

JAN HORBALV 

CLERK
#### Sandra CURLEY; Mark Curley, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, successor to Bank One NA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-30492

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 15, 2008.

Sandra Curley, pro se.

Mark Curley, pro se.

Harry Joseph Philips, Jr., Taylor, Porter, Brooks & Phillips, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendanb-Appellee.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Sandra and Mark Curley appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA. The district court found that the Curleys could not prove a prima facie case of discrimination to support their claim under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1691. The court also found no issue of material fact to support the Curleys’ claims arising under 12 C.F.R. § 202.9.

After review of the record, the evidence, and the briefs there appears to be no reversible error committed by the district court. Consequently, the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2022_2_4_15_37" style="width: 618px;"><caption><span class="tableTitle">Chart 1: Total fatalities among firefighters and supervisors of firefighters, wage and salary or volunteer, 2010–2019</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; text-align: center;" rowspan="1" scope="col">Year</th>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; text-align: center;" scope="col">Wage and salary</th>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; text-align: center;" scope="col">Volunteer</th>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; text-align: center;" scope="col">Total</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2010</p>
</th>
<td>16</td>
<td>17</td>
<td>33</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2011</p>
</th>
<td>15</td>
<td>18</td>
<td>33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2012</p>
</th>
<td>12</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>31</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2013</p>
</th>
<td>42</td>
<td>29</td>
<td>71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2014</p>
</th>
<td>16</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>35</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2015</p>
</th>
<td>20</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2016</p>
</th>
<td>28</td>
<td>17</td>
<td>45</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2017</p>
</th>
<td>20</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2018</p>
</th>
<td>24</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>46</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2019</p>
</th>
<td>22</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>31</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2022_2_4_15_37_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="4">
<p>Source: U.S. Burea of Labor Statistics, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p></p>
Exhibit 10.2

 

AMENDED AND SUBSTITUTE LINE OF CREDIT NOTE

 

	
$7,000,000
    	
December 16, 2011
    


 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, GRANITE CITY FOOD & BREWERY LTD., a Minnesota corporation (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to FIFTH THIRD BANK (the “Lender”) at the principal office of Fifth Third Bank, an Ohio banking corporation, as Administrative Agent, in Cincinnati, Ohio, in immediately available funds, the principal sum of Seven Million and 00/100 Dollars ($7,000,000.00) or, if less, the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all Line of Credit Loans made by the Lender to the Borrower pursuant to the Credit Agreement, in installments in the amounts called for by Section 2.7(b) of the Credit Agreement, together with interest on the principal amount of each Line of Credit Loan from time to time outstanding hereunder at the rates, and payable in the manner and on the dates, specified in the Credit Agreement.

 

This Amended and Substitute Line of Credit Note (this “Note”) is one of the Line of Credit Notes referred to in the Credit Agreement dated as of May 10, 2011 among the Borrower, Fifth Third Bank, an Ohio banking corporation, as Administrative Agent and the Lenders party thereto (as extended, renewed, amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), and this Note and the holder hereof are entitled to all the benefits and security provided for thereby or referred to therein, to which Credit Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement thereof.  All defined terms used in this Note, except terms otherwise defined herein, shall have the same meaning as in the Credit Agreement.  This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Illinois.

 

Voluntary prepayments may be made hereon, certain prepayments are required to be made hereon, and this Note may be declared due prior to the expressed maturity hereof, all in the events, on the terms and in the manner as provided for in the Credit Agreement.

 

The Borrower hereby waives demand, presentment, protest or notice of any kind hereunder.

 

This Note amends, supercedes, replaces and is issued as a substitute for, but does not in any way evidence repayment of or constitute a novation with respect to, that certain Line of Credit Note dated May 10, 2011, made payable by the Borrower to the Lender in the original principal amount of up to $5,000,000 (the “Existing Note”).  All of the Obligations evidenced by the Existing Note shall hereafter be evidenced by this Note.

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this Note to be duly executed and delivered on the date first set forth above by the duly authorized representative of the Borrower.

 

	
 
    	
GRANITE   CITY FOOD & BREWERY
   LTD., a Minnesota corporation 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   
    	
/s/   James G. Gilbertson 
    
	
 
    	
Name:   
    	
James   G. Gilbertson 
    
	
 
    	
Title:   
    	
Chief   Financial Officer
    


 

Amended and Substitute Line of Credit Note
[Cite as State v. Gates, 131 Ohio St.3d 372, 2012-Ohio-1221.] 

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. GATES, APPELLANT. 

[Cite as State v. Gates, 131 Ohio St.3d 372, 2012-Ohio-1221.] 

Judgment of the court of appeals reversed, and cause remanded to the court of 

appeals for application of State v. Smith. 

(No. 2012-0030—Submitted March 21, 2012—Decided March 27, 2012.) 

CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Portage County, No. 2011-P-0001, 

2011-Ohio-5711. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is 

remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Smith, 

131 Ohio St.3d 297, 2012-Ohio-781, 964 N.E.2d 423. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

Pamela J. Holder, Portage County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for 

appellee. 

Neil P. Agarwal, for appellant. 

______________________
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 28 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 28

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
     United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Secretary of 
 Agriculture relating to inspection of fish of the order Siluriformes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2015

Mr. McCain (for himself and Ms. Ayotte) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
     United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Secretary of 
 Agriculture relating to inspection of fish of the order Siluriformes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Secretary of Agriculture relating to ``Mandatory 
Inspection of Fish of the Order Siluriformes and Products Derived From 
Such Fish'' (80 Fed. Reg. 75590; December 2, 2015), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification of CEO Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a – 14 and 15d – 14 as****Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Thomas R. Trotter, the Chief Executive Officer of OrthoLogic Corp., certifythat:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OrthoLogic Corp.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 14, 2003 /s/ Thomas R. TrotterThomas R. TrotterPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15238 and #15239; WYOMING Disaster Number WY-
00039]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Wyoming

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Wyoming 
(FEMA-4327-DR), dated August 5, 2017.

DATES: Issued on 09/01/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/04/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/07/2018.

ADDRESS: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Wyoming, dated 08/05/2017, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.
    Incident: Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/07/2017 through 06/22/2017.

Primary Counties: Washakie

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-19124 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P