alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,332
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     33,419
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          35,788
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            35,902
<LOANS>                                        232,543
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 328,921
<DEPOSITS>                                     288,923
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,523
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,523
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,932    
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 328,921
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,206
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,353
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   170
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,729
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,030
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,392
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,337
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      135
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (31)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,628
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,392
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,392
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.53
<LOANS-NON>                                        209
<LOANS-PAST>                                       616
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   459
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,190
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,368
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      175
<RECOVERIES>                                       231
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,559
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,559
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50176 USDC No. W-95-CV-232

FRANK JANUARY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus THE STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - - July 11, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Frank January (TDCJ #361639) has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. January appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to comply with magistrate judge's order to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis properly verified by prison officials or to pay the requisite filing fee.No. 96-50176 -2- January has not presented a nonfrivolous issue. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that his motion for leave to proceed on appeal IFP is DENIED. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). Because his appeal is frivolous, the appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 53 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 53

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 5325.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2016

 Mr. Cochran submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 5325.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 5325, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall make the following correction to the title so 
as to read: ``Making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2017, 
and for other purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of ATSI Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur L. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,




1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By
/s/ Arthur L. SmithArthur L. SmithPresident andChief Executive OfficerMarch 17, 2011
#### Marcus Jerrell PARKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stan BURTT, Warden; Henry McMaster, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 06-7721.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 15, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 27, 2006.

Marcus Jerrell Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Melody Jane Brown, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Marcus Jerrell Parker seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdic*451tion because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 1, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed on October 3, 2006.* Because Parker failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We further dismiss Parker’s motion for a certificate of appealability as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
Exhibit 12.1

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  ($ amounts in thousands)

For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2013

For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2012

For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2011

For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2010

For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2009Earnings:Income (loss) before taxes


192,462,864


172,038,279


73,241,828


91,644,440


41,201,268Fixed charges


49,355,216


37,033,538


36,055,237


49,077,091


16,909,013​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​241,818,080


209,071,817


109,297,065


140,721,531


58,110,281Fixed charges:Interest expense


48,744,659


36,440,373


35,836,124


48,874,327


16,726,638Operating lease rental expense(1)


610,557


593,165


219,113


202,764


182,375​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​49,355,216


37,033,538


36,055,237


49,077,091


16,909,013Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:


4.90


5.65


3.03


2.87


3.44


(1)Operating
lease rental expense that is representative of the interest factor (generally presumed to be 1/3)


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
FILED AS A PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>                                          
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             713
<SECURITIES>                                       709
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (3,314)
<INVENTORY>                                     33,801 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,472
<PP&E>                                          36,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (22,543)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,985 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,047
<BONDS>                                          5,598
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,986
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           393
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,985
<SALES>                                        106,085
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,091
<CGS>                                           83,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,376
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,143
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,615
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,615
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        


</TABLE>
Form of Series 14 Preferred Stock Certificate



 Exhibit 4.1 
 P14- 
 Series 14 Preferred Stock 

CELL THERAPEUTICS, INC. 
 A Washington Corporation 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT
*                                        *
is the record holder of
*                                        
(            )* shares of Series 14 Preferred Stock of Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Corporation”) transferable only on the share register of the Corporation by
the holder, in person or by such holder’s duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed or assigned. 
 This certificate and the shares represented hereby shall be held subject to all of the provisions of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the
Corporation and any amendments thereto, a copy of each of which is on file at the office of the Corporation and made a part hereof as fully as though the provisions of said Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Second Amended and
Restated Bylaws were imprinted in full on this Certificate, to all of which the holder of this Certificate, by acceptance hereof, assents and agrees to be bound. 
 The shares represented by this Certificate are convertible into shares of Common Stock as set forth in the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation. 

The Corporation will furnish without charge to each shareholder who so requests, the powers, designations, preferences and relative,
participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences or rights. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this            day of December,
2011. 
  

					
	  
	 		 	  

	James A. Bianco, M.D. Chief Executive Officer	 		 	Louis A. Bianco, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration

 no par value 







 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY SELLS, ASSIGNS AND TRANSFERS UNTO
                                        SHARES
REPRESENTED BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE AND DOES HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT                     ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES ON
THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE WITHIN NAMED CORPORATION WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES. 

DATED                     

 

	
	  

	(Signature)


 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS
CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 
 no par value
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Michael QUARTELLO, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

Dec. 30, 1954.

*422J. Edward Lumbard, U. S. Atty., Southern Dist. of N. Y., New York City, John H. Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, for United States.

Michael Quartello, pro se.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Defendant, who was then incarcerated and without counsel, mailed a notice of intention to appeal separately to the Trial Judge and to the Assistant United States Attorney who prosecuted the case on July 15, 1954. Since the judgment of conviction was entered on July 8, 1954, these letters were sent in sufficient time to comply with the time requirements of Rule 37(a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.1 The fact that neither of them reached the Clerk’s office, although mailed in time, was not the petitioner’s fault.2 The defendant states that in filing his appeal he relied upon the advice of his former counsel who had informed him that this was the proper procedure.

Defendant’s purpose to file an appeal was reiterated in his letter to the Clerk of the Court dated August 1, 1954, which makes specific reference to his letters of July 9th and July 15th to the Judge “asking him to file an appeal for me” and requesting the Clerk to prepare the record on appeal and to have the Court appoint a lawyer to represent his interests. The failure to remit the $5 filing fee does not invalidate the notice, particularly in view of his earlier letter to the Clerk dated July 14th, stating: “I have no money, and I claim under a (Pauper’s Plea) * * *.”3 Apart from any other consideration, this letter, received within seven days of the judgment of conviction, was in effect a petition for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and appears to constitute an adequate notice of appeal.4

The notice of appeal is deemed filed as of July 15, 1954, and the Clerk is directed to note his records accordingly. The petition to prosecute the appeal in forma pauperis is granted. The order to be entered shall also contain a provision for the designation of an attorney to represent the defendant upon his appeal and for the furnishing of the necessary papers and records.

The United States Attorney is requested to propose an order in accordance with the foregoing upon sufficient notice *to*the defendant.

Settle order on notice.

1

. Cf. Boykin v. Huff, 73 App.D.C. 378, 121 F.2d 865; Oddo v. United States, 2 Cir., 171 F.2d 854; Wallace v. United States, 8 Cir., 174 F.2d 112; United States v. Dunbar, 2 Cir., 212 F.2d 654.

2

. Cf. Williams v. United States, 88 U.S. App.D.C. 212, 188 F.2d 41.

3

. Oddo v. United States, 2 Cir., 171 F.2d 854.

4

. Steffler v. United States, 319 U.S. 38, 63 S.Ct. 948, 87 L.Ed. 488; Tesciona *v.*United States, 9 Cir., 141 F.2d 811.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.     
</LEGEND>                        
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-28-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                            614
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  38,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,453
<INVENTORY>                                    27,433
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               64,000
<PP&E>                                         33,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                 19,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 82,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32,530
<BONDS>                                         8,607
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           3,294
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          387
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   82,842
<SALES>                                        97,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               98,170
<CGS>                                          76,581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  76,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               16,201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,373
<INCOME-TAX>                                      632
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,741
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .85
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19298]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-19-2017]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 7--Mayaguez, Puerto Rico; Authorization 
of Production Activity; MSD International GMBH (Puerto Rico Branch) LLC 
(Pharmaceuticals); Las Piedras, Puerto Rico

    On March 28, 2017, MSD International GMBH (Puerto Rico Branch) LLC 
submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ 
Board within Subzone 7G, in Las Piedras, Puerto Rico.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (82 FR 16159, April 3, 2017). On July 
26, 2017, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that 
no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: September 6, 2017.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19298 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________
No. 97-30677 Summary Calendar

_____________________ THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

versus

LANECO CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM INCORPORATED,

Defendants,

LANECO CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee,

versus
CARL E. WOODWARD, Incorporated,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(94-CV-3338)

_________________________________________________________________ February 19, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Carl E. Woodward, Incorporated, appeals the judgment
dismissing its cross-claim seeking indemnity and defense costs fromLaneco Construction Systems, Inc. Woodward contends that the

district court erred by concluding that t he defense and immunity
provision of the Subcontract Agreement between Woodward and Laneco
is ambiguous.
Essentially for the reasons stated by the district court, The

Continental Ins. Co. v. Laneco Construction Systems, Inc. , No. 94-
3338 (E.D. La. Apr. 24, 1997), the judgment is

AFFIRMED.