alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S H E R R Y M A R T I N , db aS h e rry M a rtin P h o t o g rap h y, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. W A L T D IS N E Y IN T E RN E T G R O U P ; et a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 55005 D. C . No . 3 : 0 9 - c v - 0 1 6 0 1 - MM AP OR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M i c ha e l M . A ne l l o, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N an d P A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P la in tif f - ap p e lla n t S h e rry M a rtin , db aS h e rryM a rtin P h o to g r ap h yap p e a ls th e d i stri ctco u rt ’ s d en i al o f h er req u estfo r p rel i m i n ary i n j u n ct i v e rel i ef ag ai n st de f e nda nt s - appe l l e e s i n c onne c t i on w i th appe l l a nt ’ s c om pl a i nta ga i ns tthe m f or 

# FI LED APR12 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSc opy r i ghti nf r i nge m e nt . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1292( a ) ( 1) , a nd w e a f f i rm. W e e x p r e s s n o v ie w o n th e m e r its o f th e c o m p la in t. O u rs o le in q u iryis w he the rthe di s tr i c tc ourtabus e d i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng pr e l i m i na ryi nj unc t i ve r e lie f . T h e L a n d s C o u n c il v . McN

a ir , 5 3 7 F .3 d 9 8 1 , 9 8 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ; se e W in te rv . N a tu r a l R e s o u r c e s D e

fe n s e C o u n c il , 129 S . C t . 365, 374 ( 2008) ( l i s t i ng f a c to r s f o rd is tr ic t c o u rt to c o n s id e r ) ; Spor t s Form , I nc . , 686 F . 2d 750, 752- 53 (9th C i r. 19 82 ) ( expl ai ni ng l i m i t ed sc op e of r evi ew ). W e c on cl ud e the di stri ct courtdi d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on . A cc ordi ng l y, w e a ff i rm the di stri ctcourt ’ s order de ny i ng the pr e l i m i na ry i nj unc t i on. W e de ny appe l l a nt ’ s r e que s tf oror a l a r gum e nta nd he rm ot i on t o s tr i ke po rt i on s of the answ er i ng bri ef . AF F I RME D.
EXHIBIT 34.1





ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING


CRITERIA FOR


ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


ON BEHALF OF OHIO POWER COMPANY, AS SERVICER





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of Directors and Shareholders





Ohio Phase-In-Recovery Funding LLC


Columbus, Ohio





We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Ohio Phase-In-Recovery Funding LLC (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Senior Secured Phase-In-Recovery Bonds, Series A-1 and A-2 (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, excluding criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)(l)(iii), 1122(d)(l)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix),1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Senior Secured Phase-In-Recovery Bonds, Series A-1 and A-2 is fairly stated, in all material respects.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Columbus, Ohio





March 30, 2017
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 11, 2017.

                    A.                     *Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

                    1.                     *Associated Banc-Corp,*                     Green Bay, Wisconsin; to merge with Bank Mutual Corporation, Milwaukee, Wisconsin and thereby indirectly acquire Bank Mutual, Brown Deer, Wisconsin and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 11, 2017.

Yao-Chin Chao,

Assistant Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2017-19547 Filed 9-13-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 31.2

I, Jai Agarwal, Chief Financial Officer of CM Finance Inc certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CM Finance Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this 8th day of September 2015.



|    |  |                                    
|--- |  | -----------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    Jai
Agarwal                 
|    |  | Jai Agarwal
Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 22, 2022

No. 04-22-00154-CV

IN RE Richard C. REIERSON, Trustee of the 

Charlotte, Brittingham & Nathaniel Family Trust, Relator

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

On March 11, 2022, relator, Richard C. Reierson, Trustee of the Charlotte, Brittingham & 

Nathaniel Family Trust, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The real parties in interest filed a 

response to which relator replied. After considering the petition, response, reply, and the record, 

this court concludes relator did not show he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the 

petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

It is so ORDERED on June 22, 2022.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of June, 2022.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017-PC-2310, styled Stephen Josh Bell, Next Friend and Parent of 

Charlotte Bell, Brittingham Bell, and Nathaniel Bell, current beneficiaries of the Charlotte, Brittingham & Nathaniel 

Family Trust, and Interested Parties in the Estate of Kirsten Bell, deceased v. Richard Reierson, Trustee of the 

Charlotte, Brittingham & Nathaniel Family Trust and Independent Executor of the Estate of Kirsten Bell, deceased, 

pending in the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Veronica Vasquez presiding.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                           |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Jason Brown                                                 |   |   |   |
| Jason                Brown Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |   |
|                                                                           |   |   |   |
| Dated:                May 15, 2007                                             |   |   |   |
|                                                                           |   |   |   |
|                                                                           |   |   |   |
| /s/                Paul Campbell                                               |   |   |   |
|  Paul                Campbell Chief                Financial Officer      |   |   |   |
|                                                                           |   |   |   |
| Dated:                May 15, 2007                                             |   |   |   |

----
#### In the Matter of George P. Alessio, Jr., Appellant, v Paul G. Carey, Respondent, et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 30, 2008;

decided February 5, 2008

Motion for leave to appeal granted. Motion for a stay granted.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2013-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.             NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.             This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.             A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2015 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2015.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 29th day of March, 2016.

 

----

 

March 29, 2016

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis |
|--------|--------|--------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brett D. Davis     |
|   | Title: | President          |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 01/71-0402]

      ( print page 43280)    
Notice is hereby given that Ticonderoga SBIC, L.P., 25 Braintree Hill Park, Suite 200, Braintree, MA 02184, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the sale of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730(a), you must not self-deal to the prejudice of a Small Business, the Licensee, its shareholders or partners, or SBA.

The transaction is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a) of the Regulations because which constitutes Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules. Ticonderoga SBIC, L.P. proposes to sell eStudySite (“eSS), 292 Euclid Ave, Suite 225, San Diego, California 92114, with Meridien Research, Inc. (“MRI”) and NRI Clinical Research (“NRI”). Because the Associates, including Ticonderoga K1, L.P., Ticonderoga KII L.P., and Craig Jones, will receive proceeds from their investments in NRI, this transaction constitutes Conflict of Interest requiring SBA's prior approval.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on this transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2017-19486 Filed 9-13-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Sandra ANDREAS, Appellant v. COCA-COLA NORTH AMERICA.

No. 06-5014.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Jan. 11, 2008.

Filed: Jan. 16, 2008.

Donald P. Russo, Bethlehem, PA, for Appellant.

Matthew A. Boyd, Michael W. Johnston, King & Spalding, Elizabeth F. Johnson, The Coca-Cola Company, Atlanta, GA, Neil J. Hamburg, Hamburg *&*Golden, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee.

BEFORE: FISHER, JORDAN and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

*OPINION OF THE COURT*

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Susan Andreas, following termination of her employment with appellee Coca-Cola North America (“Coca-Cola”), filed this suit in the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, alleging that Coca-Cola discharged her' because of her age (in violation of federal law) and in retaliation for her having filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits (in violation of Pennsylvania law). Coca-Cola removed the case to federal court. Thereafter, Andreas voluntarily dismissed her age discrimination claim, and Coca-Cola moved for summary judgment on her retaliation claim. The District Court, exercising its supplemental jurisdiction, granted summary judgment in favor of Coca-Cola.

We affirm essentially for the reasons set forth in the thorough and careful opinion of the Magistrate Judge. Viewing the summary record in the light most favorable to Andreas, she has failed to tender a *prima facie*case of a causal connection between her termination and her filing for workers’ compensation benefits. Nor has she tendered evidence from which a jury could find that Coca-Cola’s explanation for her termination1 was a pretext.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

1

. *I.e.,*that “it terminated Andreas in accordance with its normal personnel policies and procedures, because she remained unable to perform the duties of her regular-duty position after a 90-day modified work assignment, followed by thirteen weeks of short-term disability leave, and because she was unable to locate a position with Coca-Cola which she could perform, within the following 30 days.” JA at 17.
Exhibit 35.1




Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1999, as amended and as supplemented by the 2013-A SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of May 23, 2013 (as supplemented, the “Agreement”), by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, as titling trust, NILT Trust, as UTI beneficiary, and the Company, as servicer, to be conducted under his supervision; and




(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.




This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2015.




/s/ Mark Kaczynski_________________


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer