alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 247 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 247

Commemorating and honoring the actions of President Harry S. Truman and 
the crews of the Enola Gay and the Bockscar in using the atomic bomb to 
                     bring World War II to an end.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 2015

 Mr. Isakson submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Commemorating and honoring the actions of President Harry S. Truman and 
the crews of the Enola Gay and the Bockscar in using the atomic bomb to 
                     bring World War II to an end.

Whereas, during World War II, in 1945, war in the Pacific Theater between the 
        United States and Japan had entered its fourth year;
Whereas Allied military commanders were preparing to invade Japan;
Whereas President Harry S. Truman made the tactical decision to use the newly 
        developed atomic bomb against Japan instead of invading Japan;
Whereas, on August 6, 1945, the crew of the Enola Gay, under the command of 
        Colonel Paul W. Tibbets, Jr., dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, 
        Japan; and
Whereas, on August 9, 1945, the crew of the Bockscar, under the command of Major 
        Charles W. Sweeney, dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki, Japan: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commemorates and honors the courageous decision of 
        President Harry S. Truman to use atomic bombs against Japan to 
        bring an end to World War II; and
            (2) commemorates and honors the courageous actions by the 
        crews of the Enola Gay and the Bockscar in carrying out 
        missions against Hiroshima and Nagasaki, respectively, that 
        accomplished tactical terminal objectives and saved a countless 
        number of lives of citizens of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133854 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

ARIEL PEREZ, SR., Personal Representative Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. of the Estate of ARIEL E. PEREZ, JR., Stephen J. Markman, Deceased, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 133854 

 COA: 271406 

Oakland CC: 2005-065925-NM 

OAKLAND COUNTY and ROBERTA RICE, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

DR. SARATH HEMACHANDRA,

Defendant.
 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows: 

The Court denies leave to appeal in yet another case of inmate suicide.1

 Once 

again, it declines to resolve the open question whether it is relevant to consider the 

foreseeability of such a suicide when determining proximate cause. In this case, a jail 

employee removed Mr. Perez from a suicide watch despite her knowledge that he had 

recently tried to kill himself while in the jail’s custodial care. This Court should put to 

rest the question whether, in so doing, the employee committed gross negligence that was 

the proximate cause of the inmate’s death.2 

1 See the recent order denying leave to appeal in Cooper v Washtenaw Co, 477 Mich 

953 (2006). 

2

 See Robinson v Detroit, 462 Mich 439, 462 (2000). 
 _________________________________________ 

 

 

2 

This Court has acknowledged that a custodial relationship is a special relationship 

that gives rise to a duty to protect an inmate from harm, including self-inflicted harm.3

 In 

an inmate-suicide case, is that duty not meaningless if the failure to protect the inmate 

from himself can never be the proximate cause of his death? This question should not 

remain unanswered. 

3 Hickey v Zezulka (On Resubmission), 439 Mich 408, 438 (1992). 

d1030 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 2, 2007 

Clerk
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brett D. Davis, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2013-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

----

 
| March 29, 2017 |   |                                                             |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |                                                             |
|                | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis                                               |
|                | Name:  | Brett D. Davis                                                   |
|                | Title: | President (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.21



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
     with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"), I, Gerardo Canet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
     certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
     of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company.



                               /s/Gerardo Canet
                                  ----------------------------
                                  Gerardo Canet
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  November 13, 2002
Exhibit 35.1

1123 – Servicer Compliance Statement Transactions Listed With SEC

I, David J. Smith, President of CitiMortgage, Inc., certify that: 

(a) A review of CitiMortgage, Inc. (the “Servicer”) activities during the 12 month period ending December 31st, 2019 (“Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement as identified on Schedule A has been made under my supervision. 

 

(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

| February 28th, 2020

  |
|-----------------------------|
| By:                         | /s/ David J. Smith |
| Name:                       | David J. Smith |
| Title:                      | President, CitiMortgage, Inc. |

 

 

----

 

Schedule A

 

Transactions Listed with SEC 2019

| CitiMortgage Bond Administrator | CRLI Primary

Servicing (Investor

Code) | CMI Primary

Servicing (Investor

Code) | CMI- Master

Servicing (Investor

Code) | CMI Primary Bonds (Bond # or GSE Investor Block #) | Security or Deal                            | Party the Servicer Is Reporting To (Master Servicer or Trustee or Investor) | CBNA Doc

Custodian | Footnote |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------|
|                            |                                     |                                    | 7800                                    |                                               | SEQUOIA MORTGAGE TRUST 2013-8 (SEMT 2013-8) | WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION                                      |                |     |
# United States Court of Appeals **For the First Circuit**

No. 00-2436 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. LAWRENCE B. HILTZ, Defendant, Appellant.
ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court, issued on July 24, 2001, should be amended as follows: On page 6, line 5, substitute ". . . a downward departure. Based upon its review of the submitted affidavits and its familiarity with the parties and the case . . ."
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 filed on the date
hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ JOHN R. TROKA, JR.John R. Troka, Jr.Interim Chief Financial Officer
CIRCUIT COURT OF LOUDOUN COUNTY

#### Commonwealth of Virginia v. Bernadette Dimuzio

November 6, 2001

Case No. (Law) 25477

By Judge Thomas D. Horne

This case came to be heard upon the petition of Bernadette Dimuzio to have this Court review the suspension of her operator’s license by the Commissioner. Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-410.1. Ms. Dimuzio, ajuvenile, was notified by the Commissioner that, by reason of a second demerit point conviction, her license was suspended for a period of ninety days effective September 29, 2001, and ending December 27, 2001. Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-334.01. She requests that the Court issue her a restricted license.

Before the Court may accede to her request, she must demonstrate that such suspension is “manifestly unjust” as defined by the statute under which she seeks relief. “Manifest injustice” is defined by the legislature as, “those instances where the Commissioner’s order was the result of an error or was issued without authority or jurisdiction, or actually conflicts with a final order of a Court in the Commonwealth.” Va. Code Aim. § 46.2-410.1 (B). Petitioner suggests a conflict between the order of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court and the order of the Commissioner. The centerpiece of her argument is Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-278.10. That section provides: “[i]n cases involving a child who is charged with a traffic infraction, the court may impose only those penalties which are authorized to be imposed on adults for such infractions.”

Ms. Dimuzio had her license suspended by the Commissioner for failing to obey a highway sign, a traffic infraction. As this was her second demerit *64point violation, he was under a legislative mandate to so act. The judge of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court similarly followed the direction of the General Assembly and took no action to impose a penalty in excess of that provided for an adult convicted of a traffic infraction. Thus, while the court did not suspend the license of the petitioner, the commissioner did. Petitioner suggests this conflict in orders is the harbinger of manifest injustice that is the linchpin to granting her a restricted license. This Court disagrees.

If the provisions of the two statutes in question can be harmonized, then it is the responsibility of the Court to do so. The Court is of the opinion that they can be reconciled. Court imposed penalties for traffic infractions are penal in nature. They serve to deter and punish drivers who violate the rules of the road. The instant administrative license suspension by the commissioner is primarily remedial in nature. It is a reflection of the legislature’s concern for young drivers and the public safety. There is no conflict between the permitted punishment that may be imposed by the court and the administrative action of the commissioner. See, *Brame v.*Commonwealth, 252 Va. 122 (1996). Accordingly, the Petition is denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-20047

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARK BARNES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-368-4

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Mark Barnes has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Barnes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 28, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-20047 Document: 00514661767 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2018
No. 18-20047

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-20047 Document: 00514661767 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2018
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 234 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 234

     To authorize the printing of a collection of the rules of the 
                       committees of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 2015

Mr. Blunt submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     To authorize the printing of a collection of the rules of the 
                       committees of the Senate.

    Resolved, That a collection of the rules of the committees of the 
Senate, together with related materials, be printed as a Senate 
document, and that there be printed 250 additional copies of such 
document for the use of the Committee on Rules and Administration.
                                 <all>
```
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1476

LT Case No. 2022-CT-003586-A

_____________________________

WAYNE EVIN POOLE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Lake County.

Sarah Jones, Judge.

Matthew Metz, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah 

Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

March 12, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, EISNAUGLE, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
F ILED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS EL EV EN TH C IRC UIT Jun e 10 , 2 008 T HOMA S K. KA HN CLERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

N o. 07- 1535 6

D. C. Docket N o. 05-00473 -CV -W -E LISA BARNETTE, JERR Y BARNETTE, et al.,

Pl ai nti ff s- A ppe lle es ,
ve rs us CITY OF PHENIX CITY, AL., OFFIC ER LAHR, OFFICER BAI LEY, O FFIC ER NOLIN, OF FICE R CA RE AN O, OF FICE R BA RR, GROVER GOODRICH, DEPUTY, HEATH T AYLOR, DEPUT Y,

D ef en da nts -Appe lla nts
.
Appeals fr om

the United State s District Court f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f

A l ab a ma (J un e 10, 200 8)Honora ble Har vey E. Schlesing er, U nited States District J udg e for the Middle District of * Florida , sitti ng by

desig nation. 2 Before DU BIN A a nd BARK ET T, Circuit Judges, and SCH LE SIN GE R , D istrict * Judg e. PE R CU RIA M: A ppe lla nts br ing thi s in te rl oc uto ry appe al pur sua nt t o 28 U

. S. C. § 12 91 a nd Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U. S. 511, 105 S.Ct. 2806 , 86 L .E d.2d 411 (198 5), ch al le ngi ng t he dis tr ic t c ourt’ s r uli ng d en y ing the m

sum m ar y j udgm en t by

f ind ing
t h a t t h e y w e r e n o t e n t i t l e dt o q u a l i f i e di mmu n i t y w i t h r e s p e c t t o A p p e l l e e ’s c l a i ms br ough t un de r 42 U

. S. C. § 19 83. A ft er r ev ie w ing the r ec or d, r ea din g th e pa rt ie s’ br ie fs , a nd h av ing the be ne fi t of or al a rg um en t, w e co nc lud e tha t t he dis tr ic t c ourt di d no t e rr in de ny ing A ppe llants ’ m oti on f

or sum m ar y j udgm en t. A cc or din gly , the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s r uli ng is AFFIRMED.
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Commercial Mortgage ServicingD1086-120, 12th Floor 550 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2013, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator, and Custodian, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-LC12 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016. /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice President Wells Fargo Bank    

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form
      10-QSB/A for the period ending April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada, Corporate Controller
      and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C,
      ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,





1)  the
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  the
      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By
      /s/
      Antonio Estrada


Antonio
      Estrada


Corporate
      Controller and


Principal
      Financial Officer


April
      14,
      2006
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Piedad Elena ECHAVARRIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-12022

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 4, 2008.

Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William M. Norris, William M. Norris, P.A., Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before ANDERSON, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William N. Norris, appointed counsel for Piedad Elena Echavarria in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals counsel’s *167assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Echavarria’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.