Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 13, 2017 / Notices 43021 

the comment must include the factual 

and legal basis for the request, and must 

identify the specific portions of the 

comment to be withheld from the public 

record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your 

comment will be kept confidential only 

if the General Counsel grants your 

request in accordance with the law and 

the public interest. Once your comment 

has been posted on the public FTC Web 

site—as legally required by FTC Rule 

4.9(b)—we cannot redact or remove 

your comment from the FTC Web site, 

unless you submit a confidentiality 

request that meets the requirements for 

such treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), 

and the General Counsel grants that 

request. 

Visit the FTC Web site at http://

www.ftc.gov to read this Notice and the 

news release describing it. The FTC Act 

and other laws that the Commission 

administers permit the collection of 

public comments to consider and use in 

this proceeding, as appropriate. The 

Commission will consider all timely 

and responsive public comments that it 

receives on or before October 10, 2017. 

For information on the Commission’s 

privacy policy, including routine uses 

permitted by the Privacy Act, see 

https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/ 

privacy-policy. 

Analysis of Agreement Containing 

Consent Order To Aid Public Comment 

The Federal Trade Commission 

(‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) has accepted, 

subject to final approval, an agreement 

containing a consent order from 

CSGOLotto, Inc., Trevor Martin 

(‘‘Martin’’), and Thomas Cassell 

(‘‘Cassell’’) (collectively ‘‘respondents’’). 

The proposed consent order (‘‘order’’) 

has been placed on the public record for 

30 days for receipt of comments by 

interested persons. Comments received 

during this period will become part of 

the public record. After 30 days, the 

Commission will again review the 

agreement and the comments received, 

and will decide whether it should 

withdraw from the agreement or make 

the final the agreement’s order. 

This matter involves respondents’ 

advertising for their Web site, 

www.csgolotto.com (‘‘CSGO Lotto’’), 

which offered consumers the 

opportunity to gamble using what is in 

effect a virtual currency. The complaint 

alleges that respondents violated section 

5(a) of the FTC Act by misrepresenting 

that videos of Martin, Cassell, and other 

influencers gambling on CSGO Lotto 

and their social media posts about 

CSGO Lotto reflected the independent 

opinions or experiences of impartial 

users of the service. According to the 

complaint, Martin is the President, 

Cassell is the Vice President, and both 

are owners of the company operating 

CSGO Lotto, and the other influencers 

were paid to promote CSGO Lotto and 

were prohibited from impairing its 

reputation. The complaint further 

alleges that respondents deceptively 

failed to disclose that Martin and 

Cassell were owners and officers of the 

company operating CSGO Lotto and that 

other influencers received 

compensation, including monetary 

payment, to promote CSGO Lotto. 

The order includes injunctive relief to 

address these alleged violations and 

fences in similar and related violations. 

Provision I prohibits respondents, in 

connection with the sale of any product 

or service, from misrepresenting that 

any endorser of such product or service 

is an independent user or ordinary 

consumer of the product or service. 

Provision II prohibits respondents 

from making any representation about 

any consumer or other endorser of a 

product or service without disclosing, 

clearly and conspicuously, and in close 

proximity to that representation, any 

unexpected material connection 

between the consumer or endorser and 

(1) any respondent, (2) any other 

individual or entity affiliated with the 

product or service, or (3) the product or 

service (‘‘relevant material 

connections’’). The order defines 

‘‘clearly and conspicuously’’ as the term 

applies to the required disclosures. 

Provision III sets out certain 

monitoring and compliance obligations 

to ensure that when respondents 

advertise or promote any product or 

service through endorsers with relevant 

material connections, the endorsers 

comply with Provisions I and II of the 

order. These obligations include: 

Obtaining signed acknowledgements 

from such endorsers that they will 

disclose their relevant material 

connections; monitoring the endorsers’ 

representations and disclosures; 

maintaining records of monitoring 

efforts; and, under certain 

circumstances, terminating and ceasing 

payment to endorsers who misrepresent 

their independence or fail to properly 

disclose a relevant material connection. 

Provision IV mandates that 

respondents acknowledge receipt of the 

order, distribute the order to principals, 

officers, and certain employees and 

agents, and obtain signed 

acknowledgments from them. 

Provision V requires that respondents 

submit compliance reports to the FTC 

one year after the order’s issuance and 

submit notifications when certain 

events occur. 

Provision VI requires that for ten years 

respondents must create and retain 

certain records. 

Provision VII provides for the FTC’s 

continued compliance monitoring of 

respondent’s activity during the order’s 

effective dates. 

Provision VIII provides the effective 

dates of the order, including that, with 

exceptions, the order will terminate in 

20 years. 

The purpose of this analysis is to 

facilitate public comment on the order, 

and it is not intended to constitute an 

official interpretation of the complaint 

or order, or to modify the order’s terms 

in any way. 

By direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19390 Filed 9–12–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6750–01–P 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

[OMB Control No. 3090–0300; Docket No. 

2017–0001; Sequence 9] 

Information Collection; General 

Services Administration Acquisition 

Regulation; Implementation of 

Information Technology Security 

Provision 

AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, 

General Services Administration (GSA). 

ACTION: Notice of request for comments 

regarding an extension to an existing 

OMB information collection. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Regulatory Secretariat Division will be 

submitting to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) a request to review 

and approve a renewal of the currently 

approved information collection 

requirement regarding Implementation 

of Information Technology Security 

Provision. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

November 13, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

identified by Information Collection 

3090–0300, Implementation of 

Information Technology Security 

Provision, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Regulations.gov: http://

www.regulations.gov. Submit comments 

via the Federal eRulemaking portal by 

searching the OMB control number 

3090–0300. Select the link ‘‘Comment 

Now’’ that corresponds with 

‘‘Information Collection 3090–0300, 

Implementation of Information 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
43022 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 13, 2017 / Notices 

Technology Security Provision’’. Follow 

the instructions provided on the screen. 

Please include your name, company 

name (if any), and ‘‘Information 

Collection 3090–0300, Implementation 

of Information Technology Security 

Provision’’ on your attached document. 

• Mail: General Services 

Administration, Regulatory Secretariat 

Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20405. ATTN: Mr. Poe/ 

IC 3090–0300. 

Instructions: Please submit comments 

only and cite Information Collection 

3090–0300, Implementation of 

Information Technology Security 

Provision, in all correspondence related 

to this collection. Comments received 

generally will be posted without change 

to http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal and/or business 

confidential information provided. To 

confirm receipt of your comment(s), 

please check www.regulations.gov, 

approximately two to three days after 

submission to verify posting (except 

allow 30 days for posting of comments 

submitted by mail). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Kevin Funk, Program Analyst, Office of 

Acquisition Policy, at 202–357–5805 or 

via email at kevin.funk@gsa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Purpose 

Clause 552.239–71 requires 

contractors, within 30 days after 

contract award, to submit an IT Security 

Plan to the Contracting Officer and 

Contacting Officer’s Representative that 

describes the processes and procedures 

that will be followed to ensure 

appropriate security of IT resources that 

are developed, processed, or used under 

the contract. The clause will also 

require that contractors submit written 

proof of IT security authorization six 

months after contract award, and verify 

that the IT Security Plan remains valid 

annually. 

B. Annual Reporting Burden 

Respondents: 160. 

Responses per Respondent: 2. 

Total Annual Responses: 320. 

Hours per Response: 5. 

Total Burden Hours: 1,600. 

C. Public Comments 

Public comments are particularly 

invited on: Whether this collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of functions of the GSAR, 

and whether it will have practical 

utility; whether our estimate of the 

public burden of this collection of 

information is accurate, and based on 

valid assumptions and methodology; 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and ways in which we can 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on those who are to 

respond, through the use of appropriate 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Obtaining Copies of Proposals: 

Requesters may obtain a copy of the 

information collection documents from 

the General Services Administration, 

Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 

1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 

20405, telephone 202–501–4755. Please 

cite OMB Control No. 3090–0300, 

Implementation of Information 

Technology Security Provision, in all 

correspondence. 

Jeffrey A. Koses, 

Director, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office 

of Government-wide Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19349 Filed 9–12–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–61–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

[OMB Control No. 9000–0013; Docket 2017– 

0053; Sequence 7] 

Information Collection; Certified Cost 

or Pricing Data and Data Other Than 

Certified Cost or Pricing Data 

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DOD), 

General Services Administration (GSA), 

and National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA). 

ACTION: Notice of request for public 

comments regarding an extension to an 

existing OMB information collection. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Regulatory Secretariat Division will be 

submitting to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) a request to review 

and approve an extension of a 

previously approved information 

collection requirement concerning 

Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data 

Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing 

Data. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

November 13, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

identified by Information Collection 

9000–0013, Certified Cost or Pricing 

Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost 

or Pricing Data, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Regulations.gov: http://

www.regulations.gov. Submit comments 

via the Federal eRulemaking portal by 

searching the OMB control number 

9000–0013. Select the link that 

corresponds with ‘‘Information 

Collection 9000–0013, Certified Cost or 

Pricing Data and Data Other Than 

Certified Cost or Pricing Data’’. Follow 

the instructions provided on the screen. 

Please include your name, company 

name (if any), and ‘‘Information 

Collection 9000–0013, Certified Cost or 

Pricing Data and Data Other Than 

Certified Cost or Pricing Data’’, on your 

attached document. 

• Mail: General Services 

Administration, Regulatory Secretariat 

Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20405. ATTN: Mr. Poe/ 

IC 9000–0013, Certified Cost or Pricing 

Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost 

or Pricing Data. 

Instructions: Please submit comments 

only and cite Information Collection 

9000–0013, Certified Cost or Pricing 

Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost 

or Pricing Data, in all correspondence 

related to this collection. All comments 

received will be posted without change 

to http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal and/or business 

confidential information provided. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Michael O. Jackson, Procurement 

Analyst, Federal Acquisition Policy 

Division, GSA, 202–208–4949 or 

michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Purpose 

The Truth in Negotiations Act 

requires the Government to obtain 

certified cost or pricing data under 

certain circumstances. Contractors may 

request an exemption from this 

requirement under certain conditions 

and provide other information instead. 

B. Annual Reporting Burden 

Fiscal year 2016 data was obtained 

from the Federal Procurement Data 

System to estimate burdens for the 

provisions and clauses addressed in this 

information collection notice. This 

update does not include the 

requirements at FAR 42.7, Indirect Cost 

Rates, as this requirement is covered 

under OMB Control Number 9000–0069. 

The data for 52.215–20 is for new 

contract awards in FY 2016. The data 

for modifications and orders executed in 

FY 2016 applies to new contract awards 

as well as to prior multiple year 

contracts that continue to be active. The 

following is a summary of the FY 2016 

data: 

1. Subcontractor C&P Data-Mods (FAR 

52.214–28) 

Respondents: 8. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES