alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,650-01

EX P ARTE NARADAJARMAWASHINGTON, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1414894-A IN THE 177 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Ap p l i cant was convicted of possession of methlenedioxy methamphetamine (MDMA) in an amount of less than one g ram, and was sentenc ed to nine months in st ate jail. He did not appeal his convic tion. Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and that his conviction violates due proce ss beca use the evidenc e in his case was tested and found not to contain any MDMA, even though the lab test sh o ws th at t he evidenc e contained a differ ent controlled substance, methamphetamine.2

Although Applicant has discharg ed his sent ence in this case , he alleg es that he is suffe ring continuing conseque nces as a res u lt o f th is c onviction. Those continuing conseque nces are sufficie nt to allow this Court to addre ss his claims. Ex parte Harrington , 310 S.W .3d 452, 456-57 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). The pa rties have enter ed agree d finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, a nd the trial cour

t has deter mined that Applicant’s decision to plead guilty in this case was not a voluntary and intelligent choice
. Applicant is entitled to relief
. Ex parte Mable , 443 S.W .3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. 1414894 in the 177 District Court of Har ris t h County is set aside, and Applicant is rema nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Har ris County to
answe r the char g es as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any nece ssary bench
war rant within 10 day s after

the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Crimin a l Ju s ti c e
– Co r r e c ti onal Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Deliver ed: J anuar

y 27, 2016 Do not publish
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 31 

Relating to the disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the 

Government of Pakistan of F–16 Block 52 aircraft. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2016 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the proposed foreign military 

sale to the Government of Pakistan of F–16 Block 52 

aircraft. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of a letter of offer with respect to any 

4 of the following proposed sales to the Government of Paki5 stan (described in the certification Transmittal No. 15– 

6 80, sent to the Speaker of the House of Representatives 

7 and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations 

8 of the Senate pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms 

9 Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1))) on February 

10 11, 2016, is hereby prohibited: 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 31 IS 

1 (1) The proposed sale of eight (8) F–16 Block 

2 52 aircraft (two (2) C and six (6) D models), with 

3 the Fl00–PW–229 increased performance engine 

4 (Transmittal Numbered 15–80). 

5 (2) The proposed sale of fourteen (14) Joint 

6 Helmet Mounted Cueing Systems (JHMCS), and re7 lated defense articles and defense services (Trans8 mittal Numbered 15–80). 

9 (3) The proposed sale of eight (8) AN/APG– 

10 68(V)9 radars, and related defense articles and de11 fense services (Transmittal Numbered 15–80). 

12 (4) The proposed sale of eight (8) ALQ– 

13 211(V)9 Advanced Integrated Defensive Electronic 

14 Warfare Suites (AIDEWS), and related defense arti15 cles and defense services (Transmittal Numbered 

16 15–80). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
| (logo) WELLS

      FARGO | CMBS Department

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue S.E.

Minneapolis, MN 55414

  |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

                Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036 

                

 

                RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C11, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through

            Certificates Series 2013-C11

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian (“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”): 

 

 

(a)    A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and 

 

(b)   To the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 18, 2015

 

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President 

 

 

 

                Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 122 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 122

Amending rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate to limit debate 
                         on motions to proceed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 26, 2015

    Mr. Merkley (for himself and Mr. Udall) submitted the following 
     resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate to limit debate 
                         on motions to proceed.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. LIMITING DEBATE ON MOTIONS TO PROCEED UNDER RULE XXII.

    Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by--
            (1) redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) 
        and (4), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``2. Other than a motion made during the first 2 hours of a 
        new legislative day, as described in paragraph 2 of rule VIII, 
        consideration of a motion to proceed to the consideration of 
        any debatable matter, including consideration of any debatable 
        motion or appeal in connection therewith, shall be limited to 
        not more than 2 hours, to be divided equally between the 
        majority and the minority. This paragraph shall not apply to 
        motions considered nondebatable by the Senate pursuant to rule 
        or precedent.''.
                                 <all>
```
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 255 

Designating the week beginning September 14, 2015, as National HispanicServing Institutions Week. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. BENNET, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. CASEY, Mr. COONS, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. HELLER, Mr. KAINE, Mr. MARKEY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON, Mr. PETERS, 

Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. UDALL, Mr. WARNER, and Ms. WARREN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning September 14, 2015, as 

National Hispanic-Serving Institutions Week. 

Whereas Hispanic-Serving Institutions are degree-granting 

institutions that have a full-time equivalent undergraduate enrollment of at least 25 percent Hispanic students; 

Whereas Hispanic-Serving Institutions play an important role 

in educating many underprivileged students and helping 

those students attain their full potential through higher 

education; 

Whereas more than 400 Hispanic-Serving Institutions operate in the United States; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 255 ATS 

Whereas Hispanic-Serving Institutions represent just 12 percent of all nonprofit institutions of higher education, yet 

serve nearly 60 percent of all Hispanic undergraduate 

students, enrolling more than 1,700,000 Hispanic undergraduate students in 2013; 

Whereas the number of ‘‘emerging Hispanic-Serving Institutions’’, defined as institutions that do not yet meet the 

threshold of 25 percent Hispanic enrollment but serve a 

Hispanic student population of between 15 and 24 percent, grew to nearly 300 colleges and universities in 

2013; 

Whereas Hispanic-Serving Institutions are located in 21 

States and Puerto Rico, and emerging Hispanic-Serving 

Institutions are located in 29 States and Washington, 

DC; 

Whereas Hispanic-Serving Institutions are actively involved 

in stabilizing and improving the communities in which 

the institutions are located; 

Whereas celebrating the vast contributions of Hispanic-Serving Institutions to the United States strengthens the culture of the United States; and 

Whereas the achievements and goals of Hispanic-Serving Institutions deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the achievements and goals of 

3 Hispanic-Serving Institutions across the United 

4 States; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 255 ATS 

1 (2) designates the week beginning September 

2 14, 2015, as National Hispanic-Serving Institutions 

3 Week; and 

4 (3) calls on the people of the United States and 

5 interested groups to observe the week with appro6 priate ceremonies, activities, and programs to dem7 onstrate support for Hispanic-Serving Institutions. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2323 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the State of West Virginia 

to allow the operation of certain vehicles for the hauling of coal and 

coal by-products on Interstate Route 77 in Kanawha County, West Virginia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2011 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the State 

of West Virginia to allow the operation of certain vehicles 

for the hauling of coal and coal by-products on Interstate 

Route 77 in Kanawha County, West Virginia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS—INTERSTATE 

4 SYSTEM. 

5 Section 127(a) of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(13) The State of West Virginia may allow, by 

8 special permit, the operation of vehicles with a gross 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2323 IH

1 vehicle weight of up to 126,000 pounds, and with 

2 loads conforming to such single axle, tandem axle, 

3 and bridge formula limits as may be established by 

4 the State, for the hauling of coal and coal by-prod5 ucts on Interstate Route 77 in Kanawha County, 

6 West Virginia, between Exits 85 and 97.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2318 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2318

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to increase the amount of the Medal of Honor special 
            pension provided under that title by up to $500.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2011

   Mr. Sessions (for himself, Mr. West, Mr. Mack, Mr. Stutzman, Mr. 
 Marchant, Mr. Jones, Mr. Griffith of Virginia, Mr. Young of Florida, 
Mr. Bonner, Ms. Hayworth, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. 
  Conaway, Mr. Carter, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. 
 Burgess, and Mr. Neugebauer) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to increase the amount of the Medal of Honor special 
            pension provided under that title by up to $500.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medal of Honor Stipend Increase 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO INCREASE MEDAL OF 
              HONOR SPECIAL PENSION.

    (a) Authority To Increase Rate of Special Pension.--Subsection (a) 
of section 1562 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2)(A) Subject to the availability of appropriations for this 
purpose in advance in an appropriations Act, the Secretary may increase 
the rate of the special pension otherwise in effect under paragraph (1) 
by not more than $500.
    ``(B) The Secretary may not increase the rate of a special pension 
under subparagraph (A) after the Secretary has expended all the funds 
specifically provided for such purpose in an appropriations Act.
    ``(C) The authority under subparagraph (A) expires on September 30, 
2013.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (f)(1) of such section is 
amended by striking ``this section'' and inserting ``subsection 
(a)(1)''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at June 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Operations
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,436
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,499
<PP&E>                                       2,103,239
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,174,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 942,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,946
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     940,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   942,419
<SALES>                                         45,884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,831
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               310,132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (263,301)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (263,301)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (263,301)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (48.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (48.84)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 24 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.24
                                     Agreed to November 16, 2015        

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR THE UNVEILING OF THE MARBLE 
              BUST OF VICE PRESIDENT RICHARD CHENEY.

    (a) In General.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 
authorized to be used for a ceremony to unveil the marble bust of Vice 
President Richard Cheney on December 3, 2015.
    (b) Preparations.--The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol 
Police Board shall take such action as may be necessary with respect to 
physical preparations and security for the ceremony described in 
subsection (a).
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charles WEISSINGER, Appellant.

No. 07-1578.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 1, 2008.

Filed: Feb. 5, 2008.

Keith D. Sorrell, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Appellee.

Michael A. Skrien, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Appellant.

Before BYE, M. SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Charles Weissinger pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm after having three previous felony convictions for burglary, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). The district court1 sentenced Weissinger at the top of his advisory Guidelines range to 235 months in prison, plus 3 years of supervised release. On appeal, Weissinger’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Weissinger has moved for new counsel. For the reasons discussed below, we grant counsel’s motion, deny Weissinger’s motion, and affirm.

Counsel argues that Weissinger’s prior burglary convictions should not be considered violent felonies within the meaning of section 924(e). Reviewing for plain error, *see United States v. Patterson,*481 F.3d 1029, 1034 (8th Cir.2007) (failure to raise issue at sentencing results in plain-error review on appeal), we conclude that the district court did not plainly err in enhancing Weissinger’s sentence based on his prior burglary convictions, *see*18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) (definition of “violent felony” includes burglary); Mo.Rev.Stat. § 569.170 (person commits crime of burglary in second degree when he knowingly enters unlawfully or knowingly remains unlawfully in building or inhabitable structure for purpose of committing crime therein); *Taylor v. United States,*495 U.S. 575, 599, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990) (concluding that person has been convicted of burglary for purposes of § 924(e) enhancement if he is convicted of any crime, regardless of exact definition or label, having basic elements of unlawful or unprivileged entry into, or remaining in, building or structure, with intent to commit crime).

*728Counsel also argues that the sentence is unreasonable because the district court relied too heavily on Weissinger’s criminal history. Upon careful review, we conclude that the sentence is not unreasonable. *See United States v. Long Soldier,*431 F.3d 1120, 1123 (8th Cir.2005) (standard of review).

After carefully reviewing the record in accordance with *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, deny Weissinger’s motion for new counsel, and affirm.

1

. The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Exhibit 10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT TO SECURITY AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Security Agreement
(“Amendment”) dated as of December 23, 2011, is made by and between MANITEX LIFTKING, ULC, an Alberta corporation (“Debtor”) and COMERICA BANK (“Bank”), a Texas banking association and authorized foreign bank under
the Bank Act (Canada) to amend the Security Agreement dated on or about December 29, 2006, made by the Debtor to Bank (the “Agreement”). 
 1. Amendments to Agreement. The Agreement is amended as follows: 
 (a) The
Collateral as defined in the Agreement is amended to include, without limitation, “Investment Property” immediately following the reference to “securities” in the third line of paragraph 1.1. 

2. Representations. Debtor hereby ratifies and reaffirms the representations, warranties and covenants set forth in the Agreement. 

3. Miscellaneous 
 1.
This Amendment may be executed in as many counterparts as Bank and Debtor deem convenient and shall become effective upon delivery to Bank of all executed counterparts hereof. 
 2. Debtor and Bank acknowledge and agree that, except as specifically amended hereby or in connection herewith, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect in
accordance with their original terms. 
 3. Debtor ratifies and confirms that the Agreement is, and shall remain, in full force
and effect with respect to the Indebtedness (as defined therein), including without limitation, indebtedness and obligations of the Borrower now or hereafter existing or arising under or in connection with the Amended and Restated Letter Agreement,
by and between Debtor and Bank, dated as of even date herewith. 
 4. Debtor shall pay all of Bank’s legal costs and
expenses (including attorneys’ fees and expenses) incurred in the negotiation, preparation and closing hereof, including, without limitation, costs of all lien searches and financing statement filings. 







 5. Except as specifically set forth herein, nothing set forth in this Amendment shall
constitute, or be interpreted or construed to constitute, a waiver of any right or remedy of Bank, or of any default or Event of Default whether now existing or hereafter arising. 
 This Amendment to Security Agreement is executed and delivered as of the date set forth above. 
  

									
	COMERICA BANK	 		 	MANITEX LIFTKING, ULC
					
	By:	 	/S/ Omer Ahmed	 		 	By:	 	/s/ David H. Gransee
		 	Omer Ahmed	 		 	Print Name: David H. Gransee
	Its:	 	Portfolio Manager	 		 	Its:	 	VP & CFO


  
 2