alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 101101]

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “Giovanni Bellini: Landscapes of Faith in Renaissance Venice,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The J. Paul Getty Museum at the Getty Center, Los Angeles, California, from on or about October 10, 2017, until on or about January 14, 2018, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11,                           ( print page 42221)                        2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                     **Federal Register.**

 Alyson Grunder,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-18821 Filed 9-5-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 21

- 1783

___________ IN RE: LAVOND HILL, Petitioner

____________________________________ On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania ( Related to D.C. No. 3:21

- cv - 00008 ) District Judge: Honorable Stephanie L. Haines

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21

on June 24, 2021
Befor e: McKEE, GREENAWAY, JR., and BIBAS, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : September 7, 2021 )

____________________________________2 ___________ OPINION *

___________ PER CURIAM
Lavond Hill is a Pennsylvania inmate currently confined at SCI Houtzdale. Hill filed a civil rights action in the District Court claiming that he has suffered retaliation for filing
Hill v. Wetzel , D.C. No. 2:19

- cv - 960 (W.D. Pa.), and that he has otherwise been mistreated by corrections officers. Between January and April 2021, Hill filed two motions for injunctive relief, along withseveral supporting documents. None of the defendants named in Hill’s complaint has appeared in the case, and the District Court ha s not yet ruled on Hill’s motions or set a schedule for their disposition. Around one month after Hill filed the second of his two motions for injunctive relief,
he filed in this Court a petition for a writ of mandamus. Hill seeks an order compelling the
D istrict Court to act on his pending motions. See Doc. 1

- 1 at 4. Issuance of a writ of mandamus may be warranted where delay by the District Court in adjudicating an application for relief is so protracted as to amount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction. See Madden v. Myers , 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996). No such delay exists at
this time.

* This dispos ition is not an opinion of the full C ourt and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.3

That said, our observation in a prior mandamus proceeding initiated by Hill bears repeating: Applications for “immediate injunctive relief .

. . generally require pro mpt attention. ” In re Hill , 795 F. App ’ x 146, 149 (3d Cir. 2020) (per curiam) (citing Rolo v. Gen.
Dev. Corp. , 949 F.2d 695, 703 (3d Cir. 1991) ). Accordingly, Hill’s mandamus petition is denied, but without prejudice to his filing another such petition if the District Court does not take any meaningful steps in furtherance of adjudicating Hill’s motions (DC ECF Nos. 6 and 8) within thirty days of issuance of this opinion (and accompanying order)

.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2305 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make memorial headstones and 

markers available for purchase on behalf of members of reserve components who performed inactive duty training or active duty for training 

but did not serve on active duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2011 

Ms. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make memorial 

headstones and markers available for purchase on behalf 

of members of reserve components who performed inactive duty training or active duty for training but did 

not serve on active duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Memorialize Our 

5 Guardsmen and Reservists Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2305 IH

1 SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY FOR PURCHASE OF DEPARTMENT OF 

2 VETERANS AFFAIRS MEMORIAL HEADSTONES 

3 AND MARKERS FOR MEMBERS OF RESERVE 

4 COMPONENTS WHO PERFORMED CERTAIN 

5 TRAINING. 

6 Section 2306 of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section: 

9 ‘‘(h)(1) The Secretary shall make available for pur10 chase a memorial headstone or marker for the marked or 

11 unmarked grave of an individual described in paragraph 

12 (2) or for the purpose of commemorating such an indi13 vidual whose remains are unavailable. 

14 ‘‘(2) An individual described in this paragraph is an 

15 individual who— 

16 ‘‘(A) as a member of a reserve component per17 formed inactive duty training or active duty for 

18 training, but did not serve on active duty; and 

19 ‘‘(B) is not otherwise ineligible for a memorial 

20 headstone or marker on account of the nature of the 

21 individual’s separation from the Armed Forces or 

22 other cause.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 2 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.2
                                      Agreed to January 12, 2015        

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO PRESENT 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO FIRST SPECIAL SERVICE FORCE.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on February 3, 2015, for a ceremony to present the Congressional 
Gold Medal to the First Special Service Force collectively, in 
recognition of its superior service during World War II. Physical 
preparations for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Health Fitness
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2004 (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Wesley W. Winnekins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

/s/ Wesley W. Winnekins

Wesley W. Winnekins
Chief Financial Officer
November 8, 2004
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period ending January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada Jr., Sr. VP of
Finance & Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C, ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,





1)
            the
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            the
      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
    Company.





By /s/
Antonio Estrada Jr.


Antonio
Estrada Jr.


Sr. VP of
Finance & Corporate Controller and


Principal
Financial Officer


March 12,
2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) by Ladder Capital Corp (the Company), the, I, Brian
Harris, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:



Date: March 28, 2014

/s/ BRIAN HARRIS Brian Harris Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 18, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 18, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0149. JOHNNY MATTHEW BAUGHCUM v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-20469

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GRACE ENGLISH,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR-92-H-205-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 18, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Grace English has appealed the district court’s order

revoking her probation. English contends that she was not

provided with adequate notice of the law violation alleged in the

revocation petition. We have carefully reviewed the record and

the arguments of the parties and hold that English has not shown

that her due process rights were violated or that the district

court abused its discretion in revoking her probation. See

United States v. Evers, 534 F.2d 1186, 1187-88 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 429 U.S. 1024 (1976). 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 6, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42040-42041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18769]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0316; FRL-9966-82-Region 9]


Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; Nevada; 
Regional Haze Progress Report; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is correcting a 
final rule that appeared in the Federal Register on August 8, 2017. 
That rule approved the ``Nevada Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report'' 
as a revision to the Nevada Regional Haze State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) and re-codified our prior approval of the Nevada Regional Haze 
SIP.

DATES: This action is effective on September 7, 2017.

[[Page 42041]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Krishna Viswanathan, EPA, Region IX, 
Air Division, AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. 
Krishna Viswanathan may be reached at (520) 999-7880 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d6b746e6a7c737c69757c7333766f746e75737c5d786d7c337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aadcc3d9ddcbc4cbdec2cbc484c1d8c3d9c2c4cbeacfdacb84cdc5dc">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2017-16491 appearing on page 
37024 in the Federal Register of Tuesday, August 8, 2017, the following 
correction is made:


Sec.  52.1470  [Corrected]

    1. On page 37024, in the third column, in amendment 2.b. to Sec.  
52.1470, the instruction ``Adding, under the heading ``Air Quality 
Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada'' two entries before the 
entry ``Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental 
Compliance Assistance Program'' '' is corrected to read ``Adding two 
entries under the heading ``Air Quality Implementation Plan for the 
State of Nevada'' before the second instance of the entry ``Small 
Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance 
Assistance Program''.''

    Dated: August 22, 2017.
Debbie Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2017-18769 Filed 9-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. FD 36127]

                    By petition filed on June 12, 2017, Grand Elk Railroad, Inc. (GDLK), seeks an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10902 to acquire trackage rights currently held by Norfolk Southern Railway Company over 3.3 miles of track in Grand Rapids, Mich. owned by CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT).[1]                                          The proposed transaction relates to proceedings before the Board in 2008 and 2016 in Docket Nos. FD 35187 and FD 35187 (Sub-No. 1), respectively.                

                    The Board will institute a proceeding. The Board is aware of GDLK's request for expedited consideration of this petition and GDLK's related petition in Docket No. FD 36127 (Sub-No. 1) and anticipates issuing a decision addressing these matters in the near                           ( print page 42569)                        future. No further briefing is necessary at this time.                

*It is ordered:*

1. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(b), a proceeding is instituted.

                    2. Notice of the Board's action will be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

3. This decision is effective on its service date.

Decided: September 5, 2017.

By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.

Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

# Footnotes

1.                             By a second petition filed on the same date, upon approval of the acquisition exemption in Docket No. FD 36127, GDLK seeks a Board order directing restoration of GDLK operations over the 3.3-mile CSXT line.                         *See*                         GDLK Petition,                         *Grand Elk R.R.—Pet. for Board Order—Norfolk S. Ry.,*                         FD 36127 (Sub-No. 1).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2017-19102 Filed 9-7-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
(logo)CWCapital

ASSETMANAGEMENT

 

 

**Annual Statement asto Compliance**

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018**

 

 

**WFRBS 2013-C15**

 

 

Inaccordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB and with the requirements detailedin §11.12 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) forthe above-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”),in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificatewith respect to the following:

 

(A)    a review of CWCAM’sactivities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the “ReportingPeriod”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made undersuch officer’s supervision; and

 

(B)    to the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

 

Shouldyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.  

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC

 

 

/s/James P. Shevlin

JamesP. Shevlin

President/ChiefOperating Officer

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue | Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Gary Dean Campbell

, * From the 14 2nd District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR48731

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 033

- CR * April 20 , 20 2 3

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Trotter , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment s below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment s of the trial court are in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 34.16






| |  | 
| |  | 







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm

To the Board of Directors National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined National Tax Search,
LLC (the “Company”) compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria,
set forth in Item 1 122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system
(the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company has determined that only certain servicing
criteria, 1122(d)(I)(ii), 1122(d)I(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 11122(d)(4)(xii),
are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Company has determined
that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item I 22(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed
by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

Management is responsible for the Company’s
compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the
Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,
evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities
related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed
those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was
limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures
did not include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions.
We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination
on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s
assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for
the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.



Chicago, IL

January 18, 2016