alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CONGREGATION AHAVATH ACHIM, a religious, nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S OF LONDON, ENGLAND, Defendant.

Civ. 62-355.

United States District Court D. Oregon.

Nov. 13, 1962.

*276Leo Levenson, Kobin & Meyer, Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

James K. Buell and David N. Hobson, Phillips, Coughlin, Buell & Phillips, Portland, Or., for defendant.

EAST, District Judge.

The defendant moves for an order dismissing the above cause for failure of plaintiff to join as a party plaintiff one Einard LeBeck, Inc., an Oregon corporation, as an indispensable party plaintiff or in the alternative requiring that said party be joined as a party plaintiff, and it appearing that the defendant issued its all risk floater policy of insurance in the amount of $100,000.00 to the assureds “Einard LeBeck, Inc. (LeBeck) and/or Congregation Ahavath Achim.” The policy described the subject of insurance as follows:

> “Moving of the Congregation Ahavath Achim synagogue from 2800 S. W. Third Avenue to S. W. Barbur Blvd. and Gibbs St., Portland, Oregon.”

During the course of the moving work, failures in the structure of the synagogue building owned by the plaintiff developed and continued until the building had become a total loss.

In these proceedings the plaintiff seeks to recover for the loss of its building, which occurred in the course of the “moving of the * * * synagogue * * * ” in the amount of $100,000.00.

The defendant asserts that LeBeck has made claim against it for losses and damages to its property, consisting of moving equipment and expenses incurred towards the protection of property in an amount equal to or in excess of $100,-000.00. It therefore appears that while the plaintiff and LeBeck are jointly and severally named as insureds under the single policy of insurance issued by the defendant, nevertheless the two are holders of distinct separate rights and therefore may litigate their claims without the presence of the other. (See Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 3, p. 2169, Joint Obligees; Rule 19, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.)

Defendant cites Stenhouse v. Jacobson, 193 F.Supp. 694 (N.D.Cal.1961):

> “It appears that (Cheney) is a named assured in the policy upon which the action is based. It seems unreasonable to require the other defendants to defend an action in which plaintiff seeks to prove that he alone is entitled to recover upon the policy, when such an action will not be binding upon Cheney * * ” (not a party to the action).

Of course, that court held that Cheney was “an indispensable party” because it appeared that Cheney claimed some right, title, interest, and ownership in the property insured against, namely, “nutria breeding stock” and was a named insured owner. No such joint ownership in the subject matter of the insurance is shown in this case.

IT IS THEREFORE CONSIDERED and ORDERED that the defendant’s motion in the alternative be and the same are hereby each denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at September 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and the Statement of
Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and is
qualified by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,742
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,836
<PP&E>                                       2,100,504
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,190,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 954,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               96
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     953,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   954,021
<SALES>                                         79,528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               284,188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (248,849)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (248,849)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (248,849)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (46.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (46.55)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

Ludwig Kuttner, Chief Executive Officer and Charles W. Clayton, Chief
Financial Officer of Hampshire Group, Limited, each hereby certify that:

1)   The Quarterly Report of Hampshire Group, Limited on Form 10-Q for the
     period ended April 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
     Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934, and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hampshire
     Group, Limited.

Date   May 11, 2004
     -------------------

/s/ Ludwig Kuttner
------------------------
Ludwig Kuttner
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Charles W. Clayton
------------------------
Charles W. Clayton
Chief Financial Officer
II 

Calendar No. 45 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 912 

[Report No. 114–22] 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude payments received 

under the Work Colleges Program from gross income, including payments 

made from institutional funds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2015 

Mr. HATCH, from the Committee on Finance, reported the following original 

bill; which was read twice and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

payments received under the Work Colleges Program 

from gross income, including payments made from institutional funds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED UNDER 

4 THE WORK COLLEGES PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 117(c) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strikVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:05 Apr 15, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S912.PCS S912

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 912 PCS

1 ing ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (A), by striking the 

2 period at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘, 

3 or’’, and by adding at the end the following new subpara4 graph: 

5 ‘‘(C) a comprehensive student work-learn6 ing-service program (as defined in section 

7 448(e) of the Higher Education Act of 1965) 

8 operated by a work college (as defined in such 

9 section).’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to amounts received in taxable 

12 years beginning after the date of the enactment of this 

13 Act. 

14 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CONTINUOUS LEVY. 

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 6331(h) 

16 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik17 ing ‘‘30 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘35 percent’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to payments made after 180 days 

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 45 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 912 

[Report No. 114–22] 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

ments made from institutional funds. leges Program from gross income, including payexclude payments received under the Work ColAPRIL 14, 2015 

Read twice and placed on the calendar 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             67,574
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                 0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                   0
<EQUITIES>                                       24,309
<MORTGAGE>                                          156
<REAL-ESTATE>                                     3,482
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  100,152
<CASH>                                           22,270
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                    0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                            5,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  140,598
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  80,734
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 185
<POLICY-OTHER>                                    1,321
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            15,285
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   8,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          1,761
<OTHER-SE>                                       29,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    140,598
<PREMIUMS>                                       11,283
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                               2,966
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                6,325
<OTHER-INCOME>                                      111
<BENEFITS>                                        9,023
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         205
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                              5,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5,878
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,140
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3,738
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3,738
<EPS-BASIC>                                        2.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      2.12
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                        0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                   0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                     0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                      0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                       0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                               0




</TABLE>
OMNIBUS AGREEMENT EXTENSION


 


This Omnibus Agreement Extension (“Agreement”) is entered into on December 20, 2011, and is by and between EnerVest, Ltd., (f/k/a EnerVest Management Partners, Ltd.) a Texas limited partnership (“EnerVest”) and EV Energy GP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “General Partner”).







WHEREAS, the Omnibus Agreement (the “First Omnibus Agreement”), was entered into on September 29, 2006, by and among EnerVest, EV Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“EV Management”), the General Partner, EV Energy Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), and EV Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“OLP”). Any capitalized term not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth therein;







WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.3 of the First Omnibus Agreement, EnerVest and the General Partner determine the amount of general and administrative expenses that will be properly allocated to the Partnership after December 31, 2008;







WHEREAS, the First Omnibus Agreement automatically renews each year if it is not terminated by either EnerVest or the General Partner;







WHEREAS, the First Omnibus Agreement was extended by the Omnibus Agreement Extensions entered into on December 17, 2008, December 10, 2009 and December 21, 2010;







WHEREAS, neither party has terminated the First Omnibus Agreement.







In consideration of the premises and the covenants, conditions, and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, EnerVest and the General Partner hereby agree as follows:







1.                The First Omnibus Agreement shall continue in effect until December 31, 2012, subject to termination or automatic renewal on such date as provided in the First Omnibus Agreement.


 


2.                The Partnership shall pay EnerVest a fee of $1,091,666.67 per month, $13.1 million annually, for the services described in the First Omnibus Agreement, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3.3 therein.


 




  





  











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement on, and effective as of, the date first set forth above.


 



	  	
ENERVEST, LTD.

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	
EnerVest Management GP, L.C.,

	  
	  	  	
its general partner

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
By: 

	
/s/ Mark A. Houser

	  
	  	  	
Mark A. Houser

	  
	  	  	
Executive Vice President and

	  
	  	  	
Chief Operating Officer

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
EV ENERGY GP, L.P.

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	
EV Management, L.L.C.,

	  
	  	  	
a Delaware limited liability company

	  
	  	  	
its General Partner

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	
/s/ Michael E. Mercer

	  
	  	  	
Michael E. Mercer

	  
	  	  	
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                      151,258
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            151,258
<PP&E>                                      927,229
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,078,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           (558)
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     13,146
<OTHER-SE>                                1,577,096                           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,078,487
<SALES>                                         764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                764
<CGS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             14,809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                14,809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (14,045)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 3 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO 

4 CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF KING KAMEHA5 MEHA. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

7 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used for an 

8 event on June 7, 2015, to celebrate the birthday of King 

9 Kamehameha I. 

10 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

11 conduct of the event described in subsection (a) shall be 

12 carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be 

13 prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the Senate April 23, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 3 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the 

the birthday of King Kamehameha I. Capitol Visitor Center for an event to celebrate
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-17-038]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 United States International Trade Commission.

# Time and Date:

 September 7, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.

# Place:

 Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# Status:

 Open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Agendas for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote in Inv. No. 731-TA-539-C (Fourth Review) (Uranium from Russia). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determination and views of the Commission by September 20, 2017.

                        5.                         *Outstanding action jackets:*                         None.                    

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: August 29, 2017.

William R. Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-18689 Filed 8-30-17; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09

- 11

- 00 010

- CV



### _________________

IN RE COMMITMENT OF JOHN QUINCY WARREN

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10

- 03

- 03046 CV

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found John Quincy Warren suffers from a behavioral abnormality that

makes him likely to engage in a predatory act of sexual violence. The trial court civilly

committed Warren to a program of outpatient treatment and supervision to protect the

community. We affirm the trial court’ s judgment.

After perfecting appeal, Warren’ s appointed appellate counsel filed a brief

certifying that the appeal is frivolous. Appellate counsel’s brief presents counsel’ s

professional evaluation of the record and asks this Court to accept the Anders brief. See

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); In re

Commitment of Rayso n , No. 09

– 06

– 081

– CV, 2007 WL 846555, *1 (Tex. App.

—2

Beaumont Mar. 22, 2007, no pet .) (mem. op.). On January 12, 2012 , we granted leave to

file a pro se brief. Appellant filed two responses which we have reviewed for arguable

error.

We have reviewed the record and determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous.

The Anders brief filed by appellate counsel adequately presents the case, and additional

briefing by new counsel will not aid in the sat isfactory submission of the appeal. Tex. R.

App. P. 38.9. We find no arguable error requiring further action in this case. The trial

court’s judgment ordering civil commitment is affirmed. 1

AFFIRMED.

________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on September 28, 2012 Opinion Delivered October 11, 2012

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

1 Warren may challenge our decision by filing a petition for review with the Texas Supreme Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 53.
| (logo)  WELLS                                                    | Commercial Mortgage Servicing |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| **          **FARGO | D1086-120, 12th Floor         |
|                                                                  | 550 South Tryon Street        |
|                                                                  | Charlotte, NC 28202           |
|                                                                  | 1-800-326-1334                |

 

 

ANNUAL STAT EME NT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 20 13, by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and Certificate Administrator, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass -Through GS MS Certificates Series 2013 -GCJ 12 ( the "Agreement" ). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1 .        A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 20 14 through December 31, 20 14 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2 .        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WI T N E SS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6thday of Mar h 2015.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|