alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4(g)


Amendment No. 1 to the Sub-Advisory Agreement


This Amendment dated as of _________________,
2011 is entered into by and between BlackRock Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Adviser”),
and BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Sub-Adviser”).


WHEREAS, the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser
have entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement dated as of January 30, 2008 (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) pursuant to
which the Adviser appointed the Sub-Adviser to act as sub-adviser with respect to BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Portfolio
(formerly, Strategic Income Portfolio) (the “Portfolio”), a series of BlackRock Funds II (the “Fund”);
and


WHEREAS, the Sub-Advisory Agreement provides
that the Adviser will pay to the Sub-Adviser a fee, computed daily and payable monthly, as agreed to from time to time by the Adviser
and the Sub-Adviser, which fee shall not exceed the annual rates set forth on Appendix A attached thereto; and


WHEREAS, the Sub-Advisory Agreement provides
that the Sub-Advisory Agreement may be amended, subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940, by the parties to the Sub-Advisory
Agreement only by an instrument in writing signed by the party against which enforcement of the amendment is sought; and


WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the
Fund, including a majority of those Trustees who are not interested persons, specifically approved this amendment;


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending
to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


1.     
Appendix A of the Sub-Advisory Agreement is hereby amended as set forth on the Appendix A attached hereto with respect to
the Portfolio.


2.     
Except as otherwise set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the Sub-Advisory Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.



    	-1-



    	 



    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Sub-Advisory Agreement to be executed by their officers designated below as of the day
and year first above written.


BLACKROCK ADVISORS, LLC


By: ________________________

       Name:

       Title:


BLACKROCK FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, INC.


By: ________________________

       Name:

       Title:



    	-2-



    	 



    

 


Appendix A


Pursuant to Section 7 of the Sub-Advisory Agreement,
for that portion of the BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Portfolio for which the Sub-Adviser acts as sub-adviser, the Adviser
shall pay a fee to the Sub-Adviser equal to forty-six percent (46%) of the advisory fee received by the Adviser from the Portfolio
with respect to such portion, net of: (i) expense waivers and reimbursements, (ii) expenses relating to distribution and sales
support activities borne by the Adviser, and (iii) administrative, networking, recordkeeping, sub-transfer agency and shareholder
services expenses borne by the Adviser.






    	-3-
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

[Docket No. USCBP-2017-0030]


U.S. Customs and Border Protection User Fee Advisory Committee 
(UFAC) Charter Renewal

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS).

ACTION: Committee management; notice of Federal Advisory Committee 
charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) renewed the charter 
for the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's User Fee Advisory 
Committee (UFAC) on June 22, 2017. The charter will expire on June 22, 
2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sonja Grant, Office of Trade 
Relations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue 
NW., Room 3.5A, Washington, DC 20229; telephone (202) 344-1440; 
facsimile (202) 325-4290.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Name of committee: U.S. Customs and Border Protection User Fee 
Advisory Committee (UFAC).
    Purpose and objective: The charter of the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection User Fee Advisory Committee (UFAC) was renewed for two years 
in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) 5 U.S.C. 
Appendix. A copy of the charter can be found at http://www.cbp.gov/trade/stakeholder-engagement/user-fee-advisory-committee. UFAC is 
tasked with providing advice to the Secretary of the Department of 
Homeland Security through the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection on matters related to the performance of inspections 
coinciding with the assessment of an agriculture, customs, or 
immigration user fee.
    Duration: The committee's charter was renewed on June 22, 2017, and 
expires on June 22, 2019.
    Responsible CBP officials: Mr. Bradley Hayes, Office of Trade 
Relations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue 
NW., Room 3.5A, Washington, DC 20229; telephone (202) 344-1440.

    Dated: August 28, 2017.
Bradley Hayes,
Executive Director, Office of Trade Relations.
[FR Doc. 2017-19000 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42342-42343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-2385-000]


Great Valley Solar 3, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Great Valley Solar 3, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 20, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC

[[Page 42343]]

Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2949780919dbcbebbbcb781a7a2a2bda0a692b4b7a0b1fcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ca8c8f988985a4a6a3a4af99bfbabaa5b8be8aacafb8a9e4ada5bc">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 
208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 31, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-18943 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

          - [Docket Number USTR-2017-0012]

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Trade Policy Staff Committee (TPSC) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 4, 2017, requesting comments and providing notice of a hearing that will assist the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) in the preparation of its annual report to Congress on Russia's implementation of its obligations as a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The document contained an incorrect date for the hearing, which the TPSC will convene on October 10, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For procedural questions concerning written comments or participating in the public hearing, contact Yvonne Jamison at (202) 395-3475. Direct all other questions regarding this notice to Betsy Hafner, Deputy Assistant United States Trade Representative for Russia and Eurasia, at (202) 395-9124.

*Correction:*                         In the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 4, 2017, in FR Doc. 2017-16389, 82 FR 36521-22, on page 36521, in the second column, correct the                         **Dates**                         caption to read:                    

# DATES:

September 22, 2017: Deadline for filing a summary of testimony and requests to appear at the October 10, 2017 public hearing, and for submitting public comments. October 10, 2017: The TPSC will convene a public hearing on Russia's implementation of its obligations as a member of the WTO at 9:30 a.m. in Rooms 1 & 2, 1724 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20508.

Edward Gresser,

Chair, Trade Policy Staff Committee, Office of the United States Trade Representative.

[FR Doc. 2017-18653 Filed 9-1-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3290-F7-P
EXHIBIT 35.1







SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION





I, Wei Shi, certify that:





(a)           A review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 17, 2013 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2013-A Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2014 has been made under my supervision.


(b)           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.





March 25, 2015





By:  /s/ Wei Shi





Wei Shi


Group Vice President - Treasury, Business Intelligence, Analytics and Finance


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of Toyota Auto Receivables 2013-A Owner Trust
Exhibit 31

SEMT 2013-6

 

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

 

I, Jeremy P. Strom, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (“CoreLogic”), American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, “Assurant”), Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.

 

Date: March 30, 2022

 

 

/s/ Jeremy. P Strom

Signature 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
**CL** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0 1 56 CITY OF GREAT FALLS ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. HANNAH ROSE KUNTZ ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including October 13 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 5 2023

09/05/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0156
<TABLE>

                            HAMPSHIRE GROUP, LIMITED
                   STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended
                                                      --------------------
                                                      March 28,  March 29,
                                                        1998       1997
                                                      ---------  ---------
                                                            (Unaudited)
<S>                                                     <C>        <C>
Weighted average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding                   4,105      3,864
                                                        =====      =====
Net loss                                              ($1,158)     ($260)
Less - preferred dividend requirements                    -          (44)
                                                       ------       ----
Net loss applicable to common stock                   ($1,158)     ($304)
                                                       ======       ====
Net loss per share applicable to common stock          ($0.28)    ($0.08)
                                                       ======      =====
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60095 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARY BUGGS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:02-CR-79-2

-------------------- Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mary Buggs appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for distribution of cocaine base in violation 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b)(1)(C). Buggs argues that her sentence is illegal in view of the Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). Because Buggs did not raise this issue in the district court, review is limited to plain error. See United States v. Vonn , 535 U.S. 55, 59 (2002). After the district court sentenced Buggs, the SupremeNo. 04-60095 -2- Court issued its decision in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), applying its Sixth Amendment holding in Blakely to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The Supreme Court held that “[a]ny fact (other than a prior conviction) which is necessary to support a sentence exceeding the maximum authorized by the facts established by a plea of guilty or a jury verdict must be admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. at 756. Even if there was Booker error, however, Buggs cannot show plain error. Because Buggs’s sentence was based on the 12.5 grams of cocaine base that, as part of her plea agreement, she admitted distributing, Buggs cannot demonstrate that her sentence would likely have been different if the judge had sentenced her under the Booker advisory regime. See United States v. Mares , ___ F.3d ___, No. 03-21035, 2005 WL 503715 at *9 (5th Cir. Mar. 4, 2005), petition for cert. filed , No. 04-9517 (U.S. Mar. 31, 2005). Therefore, Buggs’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135452 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135452 

 COA: 280583 

Wayne CC: 06-008243

DOUGLAS WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 15 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2015 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. KIRK, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mrs. 

BOXER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, 

Mr. HEINRICH, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. KAINE, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. PETERS, Mr. 

SANDERS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. WARNER, Ms. WARREN, 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. MURPHY, and Mr. REED) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights 

amendment. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That notwithstanding any time limit contained in House 

4 Joint Resolution 208, 92d Congress, as agreed to in the 

5 Senate on March 22, 1972, the article of amendment pro6 posed to the States in that joint resolution shall be valid 

7 to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•SJ 15 IS 

1 whenever ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of 

2 the several States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IIA 

Calendar No. 21 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 8 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor Relations 

Board relating to representation case procedures. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2015 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself, Mr. ENZI, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. 

CORNYN, Mr. HATCH, Mr. ISAKSON, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. BURR, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. RISCH, Mr. PERDUE, Mr. COATS, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. ROBERTS, 

Mr. KIRK, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. THUNE, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. 

CORKER, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. HELLER, Mr. WICKER, Mr. 

SHELBY, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. PAUL, Mr. COTTON, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. VITTER, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. 

JOHNSON, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. COCHRAN, 

Mr. GARDNER, Mrs. ERNST, Mr. DAINES, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. 

LEE, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. ROUNDS, 

and Mr. SASSE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

FEBRUARY 23, 2015 

Committee discharged by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and placed 

on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the National Labor Relations Board relating to representation case procedures. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 8 PCS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Na4 tional Labor Relations Board relating to representation 

5 case procedures (published at 79 Fed. Reg. 74308 (De6 cember 15, 2014)), and such rule shall have no force or 

7 effect. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 21 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 8 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapBoard relating to representation case procedures. submitted by the National Labor Relations ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

FEBRUARY 23, 2015 

Committee discharged by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

802(c), and placed on the calendar 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS