alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, J. Theodore Borter, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D

required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on

Form 10-K of the GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-GCJ12 (the "Exchange Act periodic

reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a

whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to

state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of

the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading

with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other

information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered

by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in

this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in

the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their

obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for

asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment

of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required

to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB

and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to

this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material

instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in

this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information

provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital

Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as

Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Situs Holdings, LLC, as

Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing

Function Participant, and National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function

Participant.

 

Dated: March 27, 2015

 

 

/s/ J. Theodore Borter

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 31, 2016

NO. 03 - 16 - 00530 - CR The State of Texas, Appellant

v. Sarah Christine Padon, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE
This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court. Having reviewed the record , the Court agrees that this ap peal should be consolidated into cause number 03

- 16

- 00532

- CR and that this cause should be dismissed . Therefore, the C ourt consolidates this cause, transfers all the records and filings in this cause number to cause number 03

- 16

- 00532

- CR, and dismisses ca use number 03

- 16

- 00530

- CR
. The costs will be assessed on the disposition of cause number 03

- 16

- 00532

- CR.
**Exhibit 31.1**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION     I, Steven C. Futrell, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,2007 of Croghan Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: October 26, 2007 /s/  Steven C. Futrell   Steven C. Futrell, President and CEO   (Principal Executive Officer)  
20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         214,526
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  296,198<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               919,697
<PP&E>                                       1,805,048
<DEPRECIATION>                                 528,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,253,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          736,885
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    450,000
<COMMON>                                    15,324,537
<OTHER-SE>                                   (511,773)<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,253,008
<SALES>                                        103,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,918
<CGS>                                          151,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               952,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,049
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (820,365)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (820,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (820,365)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES STOCK SUBSCRIPTION RECEIVABLE $200,000
<F2>NOTE RECEIVABLE FOR COMMON STOCK OF $198,036 AND NOTE RECEIVABLE FOR PREFERRED
STOCK OF $313,737 ARE SHOWN AS CONTRA-EQUITY ACCOUNTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use of our reports dated March 1, 2012 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Talisman
Energy Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and January 1, 2010, and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Talisman Energy Inc., included in an exhibit to the Annual Report (Form 40-F) as at
December 31, 2011.

We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-178449) pertaining to the Employee
Stock Option Plan and Director Stock Option Plan of Talisman Energy Inc., (ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-154924) pertaining to
the Corporate Strategy Implementation Recognition Program of Talisman Energy Inc. and (iii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333- 178450)
pertaining to Performance Share Unit Plan for Eligible Employees of Talisman Energy Inc. and its Affiliates, of our reports dated March 1, 2012 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Talisman Energy Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and January 1, 2010, and the consolidated statements of
income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other
explanatory information, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Talisman Energy Inc., included in an exhibit to the Annual Report (Form 40-F)
as at December 31, 2011.

We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the shelf Registration Statement (Form F-10 No. 333-165524) of our report dated March 1,
2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Talisman Energy Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and
January 1, 2010, and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and a
summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, included in the Annual Report (Form 40-F) of Talisman Energy Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2011.

Signed "Ernst & Young LLP"

Calgary,
Canada
March 5, 2012

---



QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

STEVEN BURDA,

Petitioner

v.

ALLA KORENMAN,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 154 MM 2015

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of March, 2016, the Petition for Leav e to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED

.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-20067 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JESUS SALINAS ITURBE, also known as Jesus Salinas, also known as Jesus Iturbe Salinas, als o k n o w n a s J e s u s I t u rbe-Salinas, also known as Jesus SalinasIturbe, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CR-406-1
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney a p pointed to represent Jesus Salinas Iturbe (Salinas) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Salinas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected t h e r ein. We concur with U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 17 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-20067 Document: 00511824157 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2012No. 11-20067

counsel’s assessment that t h e a p p e a l p r e s e n t s n o n onfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APP E A L IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-20067 Document: 00511824157 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2012
2005 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 4-21-2005 

# U SA v . Guzm an P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 03-3068

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2005 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . G uzm a n" (2005). 2005 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1329. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005/1329NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o. 03- 3068

UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. RO BI NS ON GUZ M AN, A ppel l ant

ON A P P EAL F ROM THE UNI TE D ST ATE S DI S TRI CT C OURT

FOR TH E DI STRI CT O F NEW J ERSEY ( D i s tC our tN o. 02- C R - 00761) D i s t r i ctC our tJ udge: H on. J ohn C . L i fl and Subm i t t ed U nderT hi r d C i r cui tL A R 34. 1( a)

N ovember1, 2004 B efore: A L ITO , B A R R Y , and F U E N T E S C i rcui tJudg es.

( Fi l ed: A pr i l 21, 2005)

OPI NI ON O F THE COURTP E R C U R I A M:

A ft erpl eadi ng gui l t ypur s uantt o a pl ea a gr eement , t he def endanti n t hi s cas e w as s ent ence d undert he Sent enci ng G ui del i nes . T he s ent enci ng occurr ed pr i ort o t he Supr eme C our t ’ s deci s i on i n U ni t ed St at es v. B ooker , 543 U . S. ___ 125 S. C t . 738 ( 2005) . D efe ns e couns el has fi l ed a br i ef pur s uantt o A nder s v. C al i forni a, 386 U . S. 738 ( 1967) , and has m oved t o w i t hdr aw . O urr evi ew of the r ecor d has di s cl os ed onl yone n o n -f riv o lo u s is su e th a t co u ld b e ra ise d o n a p p e a l, na m e ly , tha t th e D istric t C o u rt e rre d in sen tenc ing the d ef

en d an t un d er the erro n eo u s b eli ef that the S en tenc ing G u idelines w ere m a n d a to ryra th e r th a n a d v iso ry . M o re o v e r, h a v in g d e ter m in e d th a t issu e s w ith re sp e c t to B ookerar e bes tdet er m i ned byt he D i s t r i ctC our ti n t he fi r s ti ns t ance , w e vac at e the s e n te n c e a n d re m a n d f

o r r e s e n te n c in g in a c c o rd a n c e w ith th a t o p in io n .
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-08-00157 -CV Mark O. Shiver and An gela Shiver, Appellan ts

v. P hili p J. Meszle r; G . Janni n Meszle r; Bradford Pr opertie s, Inc.; K aren Bailey; MG Real Estate Service s, Inc. d/b /a Am erispec Hom e Inspection Service

and GMAC M ortgage Corporat ion , Appellees F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF COM AL COUNTY , 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C2005- 0269 B , HO NORAB LE GARY L. STEEL , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Mark O. Shiver

and Ang ela Shiver attempted to ap p ea l a no-e vidence summary judgme nt issued by the district c ourt on Fe bruar y 7, 2008, in favor of

GMAC Mortg ag e Corporation. It a ppear s from the rec ord that this Court l acks jurisdiction bec ause the judgme nt did not dis pose of all parties and claims befor e the trial court in t he under lying c ause. See Le hm an n v . H ar-C on Cor p ., 39 S.W .3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001).

On June 26 , 2 00 8, thi s Co ur t r e qu e ste d th at th e Shi ve rs fi le a wr itt e n r espo ns e demonstratingthi s C o u rt ’s j u risdiction over their a ppeal. To date, no re sponse has be en filed. Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appeal for w ant of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(a) .2 W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Pember

ton Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Jul y

29, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 2, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-51346

Summary Calendar

 

ELIJAH LANG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER

OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-02-CV-258

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elijah Lang appeals the affirmance of the Commissioner’s

denial of his application for disability insurance benefits under

42 U.S.C. § 405. He argues that the disability decision was not

supported by substantial evidence and was not made under the

proper legal standards, that the administrative law judge (ALJ)

used improper criteria to assess his credibility, that the

magistrate judge erred in its review of the administrative
No. 03-51346

-2-

record, and that the ALJ was required to address whether he could

maintain gainful work activity.

We hold that the disability determination was supported by

substantial evidence and was made under the proper legal

standards. See Ripley v. Chater, 67 F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir.

1995). In so holding, we determine that the record supports the

ALJ’s rejection of portions of the treating physician’s

evaluation, the ALJ’s determination of Lang’s residual functional

capacity, and the ALJ’s characterization of Lang’s allegations of

disabling pain as not credible; and we conclude that the ALJ

adequately incorporated all of Lang’s disabilities in posing the

hypothetical question to the vocational expert. See Boyd v.

Apfel, 239 F.3d 698, 707 (5th Cir. 2001); Spellman v. Shalala, 1

F.3d 357, 364-65 (5th Cir. 1993); Wren v. Sullivan, 925 F.2d 123,

128-29 (5th Cir. 1991).

Lang has not established that any error committed by the

magistrate judge constitutes reversible error. This court

reviews the Commissioner’s decision for propriety. See Ripley,

67 F.3d at 555.

Finally, the evidence did not show that Lang’s ability to

maintain employment would be compromised despite his ability to

perform employment as an initial matter, and there is no

indication that the ALJ did not understand that an ability to

maintain employment is inherent in the definition of residual

functional capacity. See Dunbar v. Barnhart, 330 F.3d 670, 672
No. 03-51346

-3-

(5th Cir. 2003). Consequently, the ALJ was not required to make

a specific finding with regard to Lang’s ability to maintain

employment. See Dunbar, 330 F.3d at 672.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7226

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRANCE LANCASTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CR-01-1-HO, CA-02-40-4-H)

Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 21, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrance Lancaster, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, John Eric Evenson, II, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Terrance Lancaster seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have

reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the

district court that Lancaster has not made a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v.

Lancaster, Nos. CR-01-1-HO; CA-02-40-4-H (E.D.N.C. June 14, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1
           Section 1350 Certification -- Principal Executive Officer

                 Citizens Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citizens  Financial
Corporation  (the "Company") for the quarterly  period ended September 30, 2004,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Darrell R. Wells,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  s.s.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to s.s.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.       The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial  condition and  results of  operations  of the
Company.


                                 By:       /s/ Darrel R. Wells
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Darrell R. Wells
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 9, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Citizens Financial Corporation and
will be retained by CFC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be  considered  filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.