alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a  14 and 15d  14 as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Thomas R. Trotter, the Chief Executive Officer of OrthoLogic Corp., certify
that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OrthoLogic Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: August 9, 2004/s/ Thomas R. Trotter
President and Chief Executive Officer
Filed 1/7/21 P. v. Stewart CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for 

publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

KARL FRANKLIN STEWART,

Defendant and Appellant.

 B306480

 (Los Angeles County

 Super. Ct. No. BA144475)

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los 

Angeles County, Laura F. Priver, Judge. Dismissed.

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of 

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
2

In 1999, appellant Karl Franklin Stewart was 

convicted of murder in the first degree, attempted robbery, 

and burglary. The trial court sentenced appellant to life

imprisonment without the possibility of parole, and imposed 

a restitution fine of $10,000. Appellant appealed, and in 

2001, we affirmed.

In May 2020, appellant filed a “Motion for Modification 

of Restitution Order,” asking the trial court to strike the 

$10,000 restitution fine and reduce the amount to what 

appellant had already paid ($492.84). The court denied the 

motion, and appellant timely appealed. 

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief raising no 

issues and invoking People v. Serrano (2012) 211 

Cal.App.4th 496 (Serrano). Under Serrano, when appointed 

counsel raises no issue in an appeal from a post-judgment 

proceeding following a first appeal as of right, an appellate 

court need not independently review the record. (Id. at 498.) 

We directed counsel to send the record and a copy of the brief 

to appellant, and notified appellant of his right to respond 

within 30 days. We have received no response. Because 

neither appellant nor his counsel has raised any claims of 

error, we dismiss the appeal as abandoned. (See ibid.)
3

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL

REPORTS

MANELLA, P. J.

We concur:

WILLHITE, J.

COLLINS, J.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge A. HABIB-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41600

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 16, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Jorge A. Habib-Rodriguez, Laredo, TX, pro se.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jorge A. Habib-Rodriguez pleaded guilty to one count of aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He was sentenced to 57 months in prison.

Habib challenges the reasonableness of his sentence, particularly the district court’s failure to impose a sentence below the calculated advisory Sentencing Guidelines range, based on the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). For sentencing, Habib neither contested the calculation of that range nor objected to a sentence being imposed within it. Therefore, review is only for plain error.

The district court gave sufficient reasons for sentencing Habib within that sentencing range. Furthermore, Habib’s sentence within that advisory range was presumptively reasonable, and Habib has not shown that the “sentence ... constitute^] a clear error in the court’s exercise of its broad sentencing discretion” as to whether the sentence “(1) does not account for a factor that should have received significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or (3) represents a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors”. *United States v. Nikonova,*480 F.3d 371, 376 (5th Cir.) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 163, 169 L.Ed.2d 112 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 32.2**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the Quarterly Report of Croghan Bancshares, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kendall W. Rieman, Treasurer of the Corporation,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchangeAct of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial conditionand results of operations of the Corporation.   Date: July 21, 2006 /s/ Kendall W. Rieman     Kendall W. Rieman, Treasurer
Exhibit 4.3








AGREEMENT TO FURNISH DEBT INSTRUMENTS


Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, Criteo S.A. (the “Company”) has not included as an exhibit to its Annual Report on Form 10-K any instrument relating to long-term debt if the total amount of debt authorized by such instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.








CRITEO S.A.By:/s/ Eric EichmannName:Eric EichmannTitle:Chief Executive OfficerDate:February 29, 2016
Exhibit 10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 [Grant Date] 
 [Name] 
 [Address] 
  

	Re:	Non-Employee Director Share Award Confirmation 

 Dear [Name]: 
 This letter confirms that you have been granted a Non-Employee Director Share Award
under the Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for the following number of Shares (as defined in the Plan): 
  

	
	 Number of Shares

	
	 [            ]


 This Award will be recorded in a book-keeping account and represents your unsecured right to receive from the Company the
transfer of title to the specified number of Shares, as such number may be adjusted pursuant to the Plan, promptly following Termination of Service (as that term is defined in the Plan). Your right to the Shares is fully vested upon grant.

 Prior to the delivery of Shares to you, (i) your rights under this Award may not be transferred, pledged or hypothecated; and
(ii) you will not have any voting rights in the Shares subject to this Award. In the event a cash dividend is paid with respect to the Company’s common stock, a corresponding dividend equivalent payment will be paid to you in cash as of
the payment date for such dividend. 
 If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 407-206-6137. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	Catherine M. Peffen,
	Vice President, Global Compensation & Benefits
	Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation
NUMBER 13-14-00343-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

BELDON ROOFING COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

SUNCHASE IV HOMEOWNERS’

ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

On appeal from the 197th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on Sunchase IV Homeowners Association, Inc.’s 

motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and Beldon Roofing Company’s motion to stay 

an arbitration set for August 11, 2014 before the Honorable Robert Garza. The Court 

having fully considered the motions, the responses thereto, and the applicable law, is of 
2

the opinion that Sunchase’s motion to dismiss should be denied and that Beldon’s motion 

to stay should be granted. Accordingly, Sunchase’s motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED

and Beldon’s motion to stay is hereby GRANTED. The district court is ordered to stay 

all proceedings, including the arbitration set for August 11, 2014, pending further order of 

this Court or final disposition of this appeal. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

30th day of July, 2014.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1254

___________________________

KeOndra M. Chestang

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Shermaine S. Trotter, Corporal, Varner Unit, ADC; Kennie Bolden, Building

Major, Varner Unit, ADC (Originally named as Kennie L Bolding); C. Budnik,

Deputy Warden, Varner Unit, ADC; Floria Washington, Classification Supervisor,

Varner Unit, ADC; Greenwade, Mental Health, Varner Unit, ADC; P. Carter,

Mental Health, Varner Unit, ADC; Boatner, Nurse, Correct Care Solution;

Harston, Nurse, Correct Care Solutions; Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas

Department of Correction; Dexter Payne, Director's Assistant, Arkansas

Department of Correction; Watson, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC; Raymond Naylor,

Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, ADC; Terrie Bannister, Major Disciplinary

Hearing Officer, ADC (originally named as Terrie L Banister); McHan, Deputy

Warden, Varner Unit, ADC

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff

____________

Submitted: October 18, 2018

Filed: November 5, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Arkansas inmate KeOndra Chestang

appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment on his claims that 1

defendants violated his constitutionalrights during a pat-down search and subsequent

investigation. We first conclude that the district court adjudicated all of Chestang’s

claims and entered final judgment. See Tenkku v. Normandy Bank, 218 F.3d 926,

927 (8th Cir. 2000) (order is final if it ends litigation and leaves nothing for court to

do but execute judgment). Upon careful de novo review, viewing the record in the

light most favorable to Chestang and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor,

we also conclude that defendants were entitled to summary judgment because it was

beyond genuine dispute that the conduct alleged did not give rise to a constitutional

violation. See Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of

review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the EasternDistrict

of Arkansas.

-2-
Exhibit 35.2a



|     |  |                                     
|---- |  | ------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 1 Corelogic Drive
Westlake, TX 76262

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

This Servicer Compliance Certification is issued pursuant to the Tax Outsourcing Agreement dated as of May 28, 2009 (together with all amendments thereto, the
Agreement), between Cenlar FSB (Bank) and CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (CoreLogic).

I, Vicki Chenault, an authorized
officer of CoreLogic, certify to Bank and with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this certification, that:

1. The servicing
information required to be provided to Bank by CoreLogic under the Agreement has been so provided;

2. I am responsible for reviewing the
activities performed by CoreLogic under the Agreement and, based upon my knowledge and in all material respects throughout the relevant reporting period, CoreLogic has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement.

3. Attached to this Servicer Compliance Certification is a list of all material failures and the nature and status thereof. [NONE/NO
ATTACHMENT]



|                            |  |                      
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC
|                            | 
|By:                         |  | /s/ Vicki Chenault   
|                            |  | Vicki Chenault       
|                            |  | Senior Vice President
|                            |  | February 11, 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encysive Pharmaceuticals
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Bruce D. Given, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ BRUCE D. GIVEN, M.D.
--------------------------------------
Bruce D. Given, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Encysive
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank                           ( print page 41415)                        or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).                

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than September 14, 2017.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

                    1.                     *James C. Volkert, individually and as trustee of the James C. Volkert Revocable Living Trust, the James C. Volkert Revocable Living Trust, Susan A. Volkert, Jacquelyn Volkert, and Michael Volkert,*                     all of Montgomery, Illinois; as a group acting in concert to retain voting shares of Montgomery Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Bank of Montgomery, both in Montgomery, Illinois.                

*B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City*                     (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

                    1.                     *Jeff Schumacher,*                     Lincoln, Nebraska; to acquire voting shares of North Central Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire BankFirst, both in Norfolk, Nebraska.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 25, 2017.

Yao-Chin Chao,

Assistant Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2017-18445 Filed 8-30-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000099

28-JUN-2013

08:26 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 28 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 479
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 28

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
     United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Secretary of 
 Agriculture relating to inspection of fish of the order Siluriformes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2015

  Mr. McCain (for himself, Ms. Ayotte, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Toomey, Mr. 
  Flake, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

                              May 23, 2016

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
     United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Secretary of 
 Agriculture relating to inspection of fish of the order Siluriformes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Secretary of Agriculture relating to ``Mandatory 
Inspection of Fish of the Order Siluriformes and Products Derived From 
Such Fish'' (80 Fed. Reg. 75590; December 2, 2015), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.

                                                       Calendar No. 479

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 28

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
     United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Secretary of 
 Agriculture relating to inspection of fish of the order Siluriformes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 23, 2016

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7530

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BARRY MCCORMICK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-94-39-HO) Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry McCormick, Appellant Pro Se. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Barry McCormick appeals from the district court’s order denying McCormick’s motion for modification of his criminal sentence imposed on his guilty plea to conspiracy related to distribution of crack cocaine. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McCormick , No. CR-94-39-HO (E.D.N.C. Filed Aug. 20, 2001; Entered Aug. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED