alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

Ludwig Kuttner, Chief Executive Officer, does hereby certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the Quarterly Report of Hampshire Group, Limited on Form
     10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2004 (the "Report");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this the Report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we
     have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which the Report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,
     to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
     of directors:

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date   May 11, 2004
     ------------------
 /s/ Ludwig Kuttner
-----------------------
Ludwig Kuttner
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      13,387,876
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             535
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 40,859,997
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      40,592,787
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        40,465,772
<LOANS>                                    226,596,250
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,337,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             339,643,229
<DEPOSITS>                                 298,101,906
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,575,584
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,747,158
<LONG-TERM>                                  7,000,000
<COMMON>                                     7,931,575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,287,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             339,643,229
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,636,520
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,216,030
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                89,211
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            14,941,761
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           6,101,957
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,355,958
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,585,803
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   85,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (13,739)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,855,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,589,596
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,418,137
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,418,137
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.61
<LOANS-NON>                                    658,709
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,197,306
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               471,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,212,207
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,324,795
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  301,823
<RECOVERIES>                                   229,545
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,337,517
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,337,517
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Ramiro Udave MARTINEZ; Maria Celina Rodriguez Reyes, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-72621.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.**

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Edgardo Quintanilla, Esq., Edgardo Quintanilla Law Offices, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioners.

District Director, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Marion E. Guyton, Esq., David E. Dauenheimer, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Ramiro Udave Martinez and Maria Celina Rodriguez Reyes, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *See Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to reopen where it considered the new evidence regarding their daughter’s psychological condition and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. *See Singh v. INS,*295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (reversing the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen if it is “arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law.”).

To the extent Petitioners contend that the BIA failed to consider some or all of the evidence they submitted with the motion to reopen, they have not overcome the presumption that the BIA did review the record. *See Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir.2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Croghan Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Allan E. Mehlow, Treasurer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Corporation.






Date:  July 23, 2003                          /s/ Allan E. Mehlow *
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Allan E. Mehlow, Treasurer





* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Croghan Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Croghan Bancshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.











                                       17
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RBS Commercial Funding Inc.

600 Washington Boulevard

Stamford, Connecticut 06901

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for RBS Commercial Funding Inc., CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C13

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 7 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 

for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to the World 

War II members of the Doolittle Tokyo Raiders. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2015 

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. TESTER, Mr. 

NELSON, Ms. CANTWELL, and Mr. SCHATZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for a ceremony to award the Congressional 

Gold Medal to the World War II members of the Doolittle Tokyo Raiders. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY 

4 TO PRESENT CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL 

5 TO WORLD WAR II MEMBERS OF DOOLITTLE 

6 TOKYO RAIDERS. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

8 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on April 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 7 IS 

1 15, 2015, for a ceremony to present the Congressional 

2 Gold Medal to the World War II members of the Doolittle 

3 Tokyo Raiders, collectively, in recognition of the military 

4 service and exemplary record of the Doolittle Tokyo Raid5 ers during World War II. 

6 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

7 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 

8 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may 

9 be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ILONA KING, AKA Ilona Sismilich,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73855

Agency No. A075-090-875

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 11, 2015

San Francisco, California

Before: HAWKINS, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Ilona King petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals dismissing her appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order that

pretermitted her applications for adjustment of status and a waiver of

inadmissibility. The IJ determined that King was inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. §

FILED

AUG 19 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1182(a)(2)(C)(i).1

 We review for substantial evidence, see Alarcon-Serrano v.

I.N.S., 220 F.3d 1116, 1119 (9th Cir. 2000), and deny King’s petition.

1. The agency’s determination that there was reason to believe that King

knowingly colluded with her brother in the illicit trafficking of methamphetamine

is supported by substantial evidence. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(C)(i);

Alarcon-Serrano, 220 F.3d at 1119. On the record before the IJ, a reasonable

adjudicator would not be compelled to reach a different conclusion than the

agency’s, given the items that the police found in the living room of the house that

King indicated that she owned, King’s presence in the house when the police found

the items, the living room’s location in the house, and King, her brother, and her

husband’s statements about the items to the investigating police officers. See 8

U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); Chavez-Reyes v. Holder, 741 F.3d 1, 3 (9th Cir. 2014). 

Although King’s presence did not constitute an act of assistance, it is undisputed

that King provided a place in her house for the manufacturing. Cf. Rosemond v.

United States, 134 S. Ct. 1240, 1246 (2014); 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1). King does not

1

 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) to review the final order

of removal, given that the agency found King removable not on the basis of §

1182(a)(2)(C)(i), but rather as “[a]n alien present in the United States without

being admitted or paroled,” § 1182(a)(6)(A)(i). 

2
dispute that the activity in her house constituted drug trafficking under §

1182(a)(2)(C)(i). Thus, substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination. 

2. Consistent with our analysis above, substantial evidence also supports the

adverse credibility determination regarding King’s testimony before the IJ that she

lacked knowledge of her brother’s activity in her house. See Tamang v. Holder,

598 F.3d 1083, 1093–94 (9th Cir. 2010). Moreover, King does not contest the IJ’s

adverse credibility determination regarding her brother’s testimony. 

PETITION DENIED. 

3
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32

                        GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Global Entertainment
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Dated October 15, 2004


/s/ Richard Kozuback
-------------------------------
Richard Kozbuack
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ J. Craig Johnson
-------------------------------
J. Craig Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EDGAR CARDENAS,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00083-CR

Appeal from the

346th District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC#20180D01708) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible 

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17TH OF AUGUST, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Exhibit 35.6










ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference
is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 6, 2013, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
Special Servicer, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-375P (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant
to Section 12.7 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January
1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has
been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled
all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.



Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE U.S. CODE
  1.
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
(the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Terence E. HallTerence E. HallChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Superior Energy Services, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
2000 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      15,921,140
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  607,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,745,364
<PP&E>                                       2,587,224
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,243,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,168,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          952,517
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    50,236,553
<OTHER-SE>                                (33,020,980)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,168,090
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               497,342
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  468,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,327,219
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,055,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,055,210)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,055,210)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.321)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.321)


</TABLE>