Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 42037 

1This appears to be an error because there are two 

different terms numbered 101.59 in Env-A 101, and 

the term Incinerator is listed after term numbered 

48 and before term numbered 50. 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0138; A–1–FRL– 

9967–27–Region 1] 

Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; 

Rules for Open Burning and 

Incinerators 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions 

submitted by the State of New 

Hampshire on August 9, 2011, and July 

23, 2013. These SIP revisions establish 

rules for open burning and establish 

emission standards and operating 

practices for incinerators and wood 

waste burners that are not regulated 

pursuant to federal incinerator 

standards. We are also approving 

revisions to the definitions of 

‘‘Incinerator’’ and ‘‘Wood Waste 

Burner,’’ submitted by the State on July 

23, 2013 and October 26, 2016, 

respectively. This action is being taken 

in accordance with the Clean Air Act. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective November 6, 2017, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by October 

6, 2017. If adverse comments are 

received, EPA will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– 

OAR–2017–0138 at http://

www.regulations.gov, or via email to 

Arnold.Anne@epa.gov. For comments 

submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Once submitted, comments 

cannot be edited or removed from 

Regulations.gov. For either manner of 

submission, the EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

For the full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alison C. Simcox, Air Quality Planning 

Unit, Air Programs Branch (Mail Code 

OEP05–02), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post 

Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, 

Massachusetts, 02109–3912; (617) 918– 

1684; simcox.alison@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Background and Purpose 

II. EPA’s Evaluation of New Hampshire’s SIP 

Revisions 

III. Final Action 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background and Purpose 

On January 10, 2003, New Hampshire 

Department of Environmental Services 

(NH DES) submitted a SIP revision for 

Env-A 1000 (Prevention, Abatement and 

Control of Open Source Air Pollution). 

On August 9, 2011, NH DES submitted 

an updated version of this regulation. 

Because the 2011 submittal superseded 

the previous submission, the State 

withdrew the 2003 submittal on May 5, 

2014. The withdrawal letter is included 

in the docket for this action. 

On July 23, 2013, NH DES submitted 

Env-A 1900 (Incinerators and Wood 

Waste Burners) and Env-A 101.104 

(definition of ‘‘Incinerator’’) to EPA for 

approval. Env-A 1900 is not currently 

part of the federally-approved New 

Hampshire SIP. The definition of the 

term ‘‘Incinerator’’ is currently part of 

the New Hampshire SIP, but is codified 

at Env-A 101.59 1 and does not include 

a reference to ‘‘wood-waste burners.’’ 

The submitted definition of 

‘‘Incinerator’’ adds ‘‘wood-waste 

burners’’ to the definition and is 

codified at Env-A 101.104. The current 

SIP-approved version of the definition 

of ‘‘Incinerator’’ (Env-A 101.59) will be 

replaced by the new definition of that 

term (Env-A 101.104) as a result of this 

approval. 

A definition of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ 

is currently part of the New Hampshire 

SIP, but is codified as Env-A 101.95 and 

explicitly excludes incinerators. On 

October 26, 2016, NH DES submitted a 

revision of the definition of ‘‘Wood 

Waste Burner’’ (Env-A 101.219) to EPA 

for approval. This revised definition 

does not exclude incinerators. The 

current SIP-approved version of the 

definition of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ 

(Env-A 101.95) will be replaced by the 

new definition of that term (Env-A 

101.219) as a result of this approval. 

The version of Env-A 1900 

(Incinerators and Wood Waste Burners) 

submitted to EPA by the State included 

an affirmative defense provision for 

malfunction, which is defined as a 

sudden and unavoidable breakdown of 

process or control equipment. On April 

13, 2016, NH DES sent a letter to EPA 

withdrawing the affirmative defense 

provision in Env-A 1900 (i.e., 1902.02). 

In addition, an earlier SIP submission of 

Env-A 1900 had included an exception 

to the 20-percent visible emissions limit 

that would have allowed these 

emissions to be exceeded for one period 

of 6 continuous minutes in any 60- 

minute period during startup, 

shutdown, or malfunction. However, 

NH DES removed this exception from 

the July 23, 2013 submittal. 

After reviewing New Hampshire’s SIP 

submittals for Env-A 1000 and 1900, as 

well as the submitted definitions of 

‘‘incinerator’’ (Env-A 101.104) and 

‘‘waste wood burner’’ (101.219) and the 

letter withdrawing the affirmative 

defense provision in Env-A 1900, EPA 

is approving all of the SIP revisions 

with the exception of the withdrawn 

portion relating to affirmative defenses. 

II. EPA’s Evaluation of New 

Hampshire’s SIP Revisions 

On August 9, 2011, NH DES 

submitted a revision of Env-A 1000 for 

approval into the New Hampshire SIP. 

This revision establishes requirements 

for open burning, fugitive dust and 

firefighter instruction and training 

activities. Specifically, Env-A 1000 sets 

general open-burning requirements, 

authorizes certain materials to be 

burned in the open, and identifies 

materials that are prohibited from being 

burned in the open. The version of EnvA 1000 that was originally approved 

into the SIP in 1994 (59 FR 42766) 

identifies the types of burning that are 

generally allowed by the State, such as 

outdoor grills, burning for agricultural 

or forestry improvement or firefighter 

training, as well as a list of generally 

prohibited burning activities, such as 

burning of rubbish, brush, demolition 

debris or tires, or burning at any solid 

waste disposal area. The revised SIPsubmitted regulation includes all these 


nlaroche on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
42038 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 

2EPA email from Felice Janelle (NH DES) to 

Alison Simcox (EPA, Region 1), June 23, 2016, ‘‘RE: 

SIP revisions for Env-A 101.104 and 1900.’’ This 

correspondence is included in the docket for 

today’s action. 

permissible and prohibited types of 

burning. In addition, the revision adds 

definitions of key terms used in the 

regulation, such as ‘‘demolition debris,’’ 

‘‘salvaging operation,’’ and ‘‘untreated 

wood,’’ as well as references to 

applicable state statutes. The revised 

regulation also adds sections on (1) 

precautions to prevent and control 

fugitive dust, and (2) provisions to 

minimize air pollution from open 

burning for firefighter instruction and 

training purposes. 

New Hampshire’s revision to Env-A 

1000 removes two references to 

‘‘nuisance’’ in the current SIP, which 

was approved in 1994. EPA believes 

that the State’s regulation is approvable 

under the Clean Air Act (CAA) because 

the term ‘‘nuisance’’ in Env-A 1000 is a 

broad concept that could be applied to 

prohibit activities that bear no 

reasonable connection to the National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS) and related air-quality goals of 

the CAA. The fact that something may 

cause a nuisance does not necessarily 

equate to a condition that would 

interfere with attainment or 

maintenance of the NAAQS. The 

concept of a nuisance is too vague for 

EPA to rely on as a NAAQS attainment 

or maintenance strategy. See, for 

example, analogous instances in which 

EPA has removed from SIPs certain 

regulations that prohibit odors (61 FR 

47058), or that contain a general 

prohibition against air pollution (63 FR 

65557). 

New Hampshire’s revision to Env-A 

1000 removes a reference to NAAQS 

nonattainment areas for particulates 

(i.e., Particulate Matter or PM) that 

appears in the current SIP-approved 

version of Env-A 1000. Specifically, SIPapproved Env-A 1001.02 allowed for 

certain types of open burning if: (1) Not 

prohibited by local ordinance or 

officials having jurisdiction, such as 

state forest fire wardens, and (2) where 

the particular area has not been 

designated nonattainment in relation to 

the NAAQS for PM. Under Env-A 1000, 

such burning was allowed in NAAQS 

nonattainment areas for PM (when not 

prohibited by local ordinance or 

officials having jurisdiction) if written 

authorization had been obtained by the 

NH DES. EPA believes that the version 

of Env-A 1000 we are approving today 

is approvable, notwithstanding the 

absence of references to nonattainment 

areas for NAAQS as a limiting condition 

on certain types of burning because 

there have not been any areas of New 

Hampshire designated as not attaining a 

PM NAAQS. Thus, the version of EnvA 1000 we are approving today is 

functionally equivalent to the existing 

SIP-approved version and the latter’s 

references to PM nonattainment areas 

are unnecessary. 

The submitted Env-A 1000 retains 

existing provisions currently in the New 

Hampshire SIP, except for the term 

‘‘nuisance’’ and references to PM 

nonattainment areas as discussed above. 

EPA has determined that the SIP 

revision meets the requirements of 

section 110(l) of the CAA in that it will 

not interfere with any applicable 

requirement concerning attainment and 

reasonable further progress, or with any 

other applicable requirement of the 

CAA. Further, the additional 

requirements in the revised regulation 

will benefit public health and the 

environment by controlling PM 

emissions from open burning and 

fugitive dust. Consequently, EPA is 

approving Env-A 1000 into the New 

Hampshire SIP. 

On July 23, 2013, NH DES submitted 

Env-A 1900 (Incinerators and Wood 

Waste Burners) and a revision of Env-A 

101.104 (definition of ‘‘Incinerator’’) for 

approval into the New Hampshire SIP. 

Env-A 101.104 defines ‘‘Incinerator’’ 

as ‘‘a device engineered to burn or 

oxidize solid, semi-solid, liquid, or 

gaseous waste for the primary purpose 

of volume reduction, disposal, or 

chemical destruction, leaving little or no 

combustible material. Such devices 

include, but are not limited to, heat 

recovery systems and wood waste 

burners.’’ This definition is the same as 

that which is currently in the New 

Hampshire SIP (approved on August 14, 

1992; 57 FR 36603), except that the 

definition has been amended to include 

‘‘wood waste burners.’’ 

Also, on October 26, 2016, NH DES 

submitted Env-A 101.219, a revised 

definition of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ to 

EPA. This revised definition no longer 

excludes incinerators. 

Thus, more sources are now included 

in the revised definition of 

‘‘Incinerator’’ and are subject to 

regulation. The definition meets the 

anti-back sliding requirements of 

section 110(l) of the CAA in that it will 

not interfere with any applicable 

requirement concerning attainment and 

reasonable further progress, or with any 

other applicable requirement of the 

CAA. Therefore, EPA is approving the 

revised definition into the New 

Hampshire SIP. We also note that the 

current SIP-approved definition of the 

term ‘‘Incinerator’’ is codified as Env-A 

101.59. The new codification, Env-A 

101.104, and revised definition we are 

approving in this action will replace the 

old definition and old codification at 

Env-A 101.59. 

Env-A 101.219 establishes the 

definition of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ as 

‘‘any device such as burners used to 

dispose of wood waste by burning, and 

which are commonly known as teepees, 

wigwams, truncated cones or silos.’’ NH 

DES considers the term ‘‘wood waste’’ 

to be consistent with EPA’s definition of 

‘‘clean cellulosic biomass’’ as defined at 

40 CFR 241.2, and, therefore, does not 

consider wood waste to be a solid waste. 

As a consequence, wood waste burners 

are not specifically regulated by NH 

DES pursuant to federal incinerator or 

waste combustor standards in New 

Hampshire’s Env-A 3300 and Env-A 

4300. Thus, wood waste burners are 

regulated under Env-A 1900.2

Env-A 1900 establishes emission 

standards and operating practices for 

incinerators and wood waste burners 

that are not regulated pursuant to 

federal incinerator standards. 

Particulate emissions standards in EnvA 1900 for incinerators would not allow 

the incinerator to emit more than 0.675 

grams per dry standard cubic meter (g/ 

dscm), equivalent to 0.3 grains per dry 

standard cubic foot (grains/dscf), 

corrected to 7 percent oxygen (O2). The 

standard for allowable visible emissions 

for incinerators is 20 percent opacity for 

any continuous 6-minute period. In 

addition, Env-A 1900 includes 

requirements for posting instructions for 

incinerator operation and for training of 

incinerator operators. This rule will 

benefit public health and the 

environment by controlling PM 

emissions and visible emissions from 

incinerators that are not regulated under 

federal incinerator rules. Therefore, EPA 

is approving Env-A 1900 into the New 

Hampshire SIP. 

III. Final Action 

EPA is approving and incorporating 

two regulations into the New Hampshire 

SIP. The two regulations include revised 

Env-A 1000 (Prevention, Abatement and 

Control of Open Source Air Pollution) 

submitted by the State of New 

Hampshire on August 9, 2011, effective 

on May 1, 2011; and Env-A 1900 

(Incinerators and Wood Waste Burners) 

submitted by the State on July 23, 2013, 

effective April 23, 2013, except for the 

withdrawn affirmative defense 

provision. The revised version of Env-A 

1000 that we are approving into the SIP 

will replace the existing SIP-approved 

version of Env-A 1000. 

In addition, EPA is approving a 

revised definition of ‘‘Incinerator’’ (EnvVerDate Sep<11>2014 15:36 Sep 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM 06SER1

nlaroche on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 42039 

A 101.104), submitted by the State on 

July 23, 2013, effective April 23, 2013, 

which replaces the definition of 

‘‘Incinerator’’ currently in the New 

Hampshire SIP (numbered Env-A 

101.59). We are also approving a revised 

definition of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ 

(Env-A 101.219), submitted by the State 

on October 26, 2016, effective January 

14, 2005, which replaces the definition 

of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ currently in 

the New Hampshire SIP (numbered EnvA 101.95). Thus, the SIP at Env-A 

101.59 and at Env-A 101.95 will read 

‘‘[reserved].’’ 

New Hampshire organizes Env-A 101 

(Definitions) alphabetically, and also 

assigns a codification number, in 

sequential order, to each defined term. 

Because the State’s SIP submissions did 

not include the entirety of Env-A 100, 

and the State has added other 

definitions to Env-A 100 over time (not 

all of which are SIP-approved), our 

approval of the two definitions in this 

action will result in the numbered 

codification assigned to the defined 

terms being out of numerical sequence 

in the SIP. However, the two defined 

terms will still be in alphabetical order. 

As noted earlier, the affirmative defense 

provision, which NH DES withdrew 

from its July 23, 2013 SIP submittal, is 

not included in this approval action and 

is contained in state law only, codified 

at Env-A 1902.02. 

The EPA is publishing this action 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

amendment and anticipates no adverse 

comments. However, in the proposed 

rules section of this Federal Register 

publication, EPA is publishing a 

separate document that will serve as the 

proposal to approve the SIP revision 

should relevant adverse comments be 

filed. This rule will be effective 

November 6, 2017 without further 

notice unless the Agency receives 

relevant adverse comments by October 

6, 2017. 

If the EPA receives such comments, 

then EPA will publish an action 

withdrawing the final rule and 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. All public comments 

received will then be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. The EPA will not 

institute a second comment period on 

the proposed rule. All parties interested 

in commenting on the proposed rule 

should do so at this time. If no such 

comments are received, the public is 

advised that this rule will be effective 

on November 6, 2017 and no further 

action will be taken on the proposed 

rule. Please note that if EPA receives 

adverse comment on an amendment, 

paragraph, or section of this rule and if 

that provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, the EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, the EPA is finalizing the 

incorporation by reference the New 

Hampshire Code of Administrative 

Rules stated in section III. The EPA has 

made, and will continue to make, these 

materials generally available through 

www.regulations.gov, and/or at the EPA 

Region 1 Office (please contact the 

person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

preamble for more information). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved to 

apply on any Indian reservation land or 

in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by November 6, 

2017. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the proposed rules 

section of this Federal Register, rather 

than file an immediate petition for 


nlaroche on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
42040 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 

judicial review of this direct final rule, 

so that EPA can withdraw this direct 

final rule and address the comment in 

the proposed rulemaking. This action 

may not be challenged later in 

proceedings to enforce its requirements. 

(See section 307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: August 9, 2017. 

Deborah A. Szaro, 

Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New 

England. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart EE—New Hampshire 

■ 2. In § 52.1520(c), the table is 

amended by adding four entries for 

‘‘Env-A 100’’ after the entry ‘‘Env-A 100; 

Organizational Rules: Definitions’’; 

revising the entry for ‘‘Env-A 1000’’; and 

by adding an entry for ‘‘Env-A 1900’’ in 

numerical order to read as follows: 

§ 52.1520 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED NEW HAMPSHIRE REGULATIONS

State citation Title/subject State effective 

date EPA approval date 1 Explanations 

*******

Env-A 100 .................. Definition of ‘‘Incinerator’’ .............................. 04/29/2003 09/06/2017 ........................

[Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Remove Part Env-A 

101.59, definition of ‘‘Incinerator’’ and replace 

with ‘‘[reserved].’’ 

Env-A 100 .................. Definition of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ .............. 04/29/2003 09/06/2017 ........................

[Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Remove Part Env-A 

101.95, definition of 

‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ 

and replace with ‘‘[reserved].’’ 

Env-A 100 .................. Definition of ‘‘Incinerator’’ .............................. 04/23/2013 09/06/2017 ........................

[Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Approve Part Env-A 

101.104, definition of 

‘‘Incinerator.’’ 

Env-A 100 .................. Definition of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ .............. 01/14/2005 [Insert Federal Register 

date of publication].

[Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Approve Part Env-A 

101.219, definition of 

‘‘Wood Waste Burner.’’ 

* * * * * * * 

Env-A 1000 ................ Control of Open Burning ............................... 05/01/2011 09/06/2017 ........................

[Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Approve Part Env-A 1000 

‘‘Prevention, Abatement 

and Control of Open 

Source Air Pollution.’’ 

* * * * * * * 

Env-A 1900 ................ Emission Standards and Operating ..............

Practices for Incinerators ..............................

04/23/2013 09/06/2017 ........................

[Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Approve Part Env-A 1900 

‘‘Incinerators and Wood 

Waste Burners.’’ 

* * * * * * * 

1 In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2017–18774 Filed 9–5–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0316; FRL–9966–82– 

Region 9] 

Approval and Promulgation of State 

Implementation Plans; Nevada; 

Regional Haze Progress Report; 

Correction 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule, correction. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is correcting a final rule 

that appeared in the Federal Register on 

August 8, 2017. That rule approved the 

‘‘Nevada Regional Haze 5-Year Progress 

Report’’ as a revision to the Nevada 

Regional Haze State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) and re-codified our prior 

approval of the Nevada Regional Haze 

SIP. 

DATES: This action is effective on 

September 7, 2017. 


nlaroche on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES