alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Unilever N.V., a corporation organized under the laws of The Netherlands (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2015as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: 23 February 2016



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman                    
|Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman Chief Executive Officer
|                                                             
|Dated: 23 February 2016                                      
|                                                             
|/s/ Graeme David Pitkethly                                   
|Graeme David Pitkethly
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |  |  |                                                                          
|---- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045

Citibank N.A.

17g-5 Information
Provider

ratingagencynotice@citi.com

RE: Annual Statement
as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), as Master Servicer,
hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period):

(a) a review of Wells
Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement listed on Schedule A hereto (the Servicing Agreement) has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period, except as described on Schedule B hereto.

February 27, 2014



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
|Kristen Ann Cronin    
|Vice President        
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO



---

Schedule A

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated May 1, 2013 for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-7, by and among Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc., as Depositor, Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee. 1





|1 | The Pooling and Servicing Agreement was amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 to reflect the resignation of Wells Fargo as the Securities Administrator and Paying Agent (among other roles). See the Form
8-K filed on January 6, 2014 for additional information.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2



---

Schedule B

None



3
#### Andrea Z. CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, DefendantAppellee.

No. 06-15194.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 7, 2007.*

Filed Dec. 20, 2007.

Howard Moore, Jr., Esq., Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*22Alyson Cabrera, Esq., Gordon & Rees, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for DefendantAppellee.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, COWEN,** and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Robert E. Cowen, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

We review the grant of summary judgment *de novo,*viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. *Buono v. Norton,*371 F.3d 543, 545 (9th Cir.2004).

There is no merit to Christian’s arguments that the District Court disregarded certain relevant evidence and improperly credited the testimony of interested witnesses. The District Court considered the evidence pertaining directly to Christian’s time-barred claims in deciding that she satisfied her *prima facie*showing on the disability termination claim. *See Road v. Fairbanks N. Star Borough Sch. Dist.,*323 F.3d 1185, 1192 (9th Cir.2003). That a witness may have an interest in the outcome of the case merely goes to the evidentiary weight of his testimony and does not entirely preclude its consideration at the summary judgment stage.

Christian did not proffer any evidence of pretext to rebut the employer’s facially legitimate reasons for her negative performance reviews and termination, i.e., her evaluations were based on criticism from co-workers, and her termination occurred because she failed to return to work upon the conclusion of her allotted personal leave. Since all of her discrimination and retaliation claims are premised on these adverse employment actions, the District Court correctly concluded that Christian failed to carry her burden. *See Manatt v. Bank of Am.,*339 F.3d 792, 801 (9th Cir.2003) (affirming grant of summary judgment where employee did not show pretext); *see also Flait v. N. Am. Watch Corp.,*3 Cal.App.4th 467, 475-76, 4 Cal.Rptr.2d 522 (1992) (same burden-shifting analysis applies to California retaliatory termination claims as to federal employment claims).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 113 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend the issuance of, and the United States Postal 

Service should issue, a commemorative stamp in honor of the holiday 

of Diwali. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2015 

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Citizens’ Stamp 

Advisory Committee should recommend the issuance of, 

and the United States Postal Service should issue, a 

commemorative stamp in honor of the holiday of Diwali. 

Whereas Diwali, also referred to as the ‘‘festival of lights’’, 

is an Indian holiday that marks the beginning of the 

Hindu New Year; 

Whereas Diwali celebrates the triumph of good over evil, the 

awareness of one’s inner light, the dispelling of ignorance, and bringing peace and joy through the awakening 

gained from a higher knowledge; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 113 IS 

Whereas Diwali is observed in the United States, and across 

the globe, by Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Jains, and Buddhists; 

Whereas as one of the world’s oldest religious holidays, 

Diwali serves not only as a time for celebration, but also 

as a time for communities and families to come together 

in spiritual enlightenment; 

Whereas the practice of celebrating Diwali has survived political, economic, and social changes throughout history, 

while always carrying the universal symbolism of the victory of light, goodness, knowledge, and truth; 

Whereas the United States Postal Service, in accordance with 

recommendations of the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee, has issued stamps for other popular holidays in 

the United States, including Christmas, Kwanzaa, Hanukkah, and Eid al-Fitr; 

Whereas the United States Postal Service has yet to issue a 

stamp in honor of Diwali; and 

Whereas issuing a postage stamp honoring Diwali is fitting 

and proper: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the United States Postal Service should 

3 issue a postage stamp honoring the holiday of 

4 Diwali; and 

5 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

6 should recommend to the Postmaster General that 

7 such a stamp be issued. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2013-CCRE8

The undersigned, duly authorized officers of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of June 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor,
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC
Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,
as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies
in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ Ronaldo Reyes

BY: Ronaldo Reyes

Title: Vice President

Date: March 1, 2019



/s/ Karlene Collins

BY: Karlene Collins

Title: Assistant Vice President

Date: March 1, 2019
firstamendmentnoncompete.htm






FIRST AMENDMENT TO NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT







This First Amendment to Non-Compete Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into effective as of the 15th day of December, 2011 by and between ROBERT C. MORGAN and ROBERT MOSER, both having an address at c/o Morgan Management, 1170 Pittsford Victor Road, Pittsford, New York 14534, and SUN COMMUNITIES OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, with an address at c/o Sun Communities, Inc., 27777 Franklin Road, Suite 200, Southfield, Michigan  48034 (the “SCOLP”).







RECITALS







A.           Robert C. Morgan, Robert Moser and SCOLP are parties to that certain Non-Compete Agreement, dated November 29, 2011 (the “Non-Compete Agreement”); and







B.           The parties desire to amend the Non-Compete Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein.







C.           All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall be defined as set forth in the Non-Compete Agreement.







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:







1.           The Non-Compete Agreement is hereby amended to reflect that at Closing, SCOLP shall pay interest in an amount equal to five (5%) percent per annum on the Non-Compete Consideration for the time period between December 1, 2011 and December 15, 2011 (or the actual Closing Date, whichever is later).







2.           Except as set forth herein, the Non-Compete Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.







3.           This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, and by separate parties hereon on separate counterparts, and all of such counterparts taken together shall constitute one and the same Amendment.  This Amendment may be executed and delivered by facsimile.  The section headings set forth in this Amendment are for convenience of reference only, and do not define, limit or construe the contents of such sections.







[Signature page attached]










 



  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.







 







 







 








	
SUN COMMUNITIES OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,


a Michigan limited partnership


	
 


By:           Sun Communities, Inc., General Partner


	
 


By:       /s/ Jonathan Colman                                               


Name:  Jonathan Colman


Title:    Executive Vice President











































	
 


/s/ Robert C. Morgan


ROBERT C. MORGAN


 


	  
	
 


/s/ Robert Moser


ROBERT MOSER
ex10_16.htm








Exhibit 10.16


 


Description of Employment Arrangement with Robert A. Olivarez







Mr. Olivarez receives an annual base salary of $140,000.  Our board of directors determines Mr. Olivarez’ discretionary bonus based on performance and his contributions to our success.
**Exhibit        4.1**

**AGREEMENT        TO EXTEND PROMISSORY NOTE**

**ATSI        COMMUNICATIONS, INC**
**FRANKLIN,        CARDWELL & JONES, PC**

** **
** **

** **

** **

| 1.   | The                  Maturity Date of the Promissory Note shall be extended until December                  1,                  2006. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                  principal balance is now $90,000 as of December 1,                  2005. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | All                  other terms and conditions of the Notes shall apply as originally                  agreed                  to, with the exception of the above-mentioned                  items. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | This                  Extension contains the entire agreement between the parties. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **ATSI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.**                                          |   |   | **FRANKLIN, CARDWELL & JONES, PC.** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                                                   |   |   |                                    |
|                                                                   |   |   |                                    |
|                                                                   |   |   |                                    |
| Antonio                  Estrada,Corporate                  Controller |   |   | Lawrence                Wilson          |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 18, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3087.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line Project Committee will be held Wednesday, October 18, 2017, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Fred Smith. For more information please contact Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3087, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 1509—National Office, Washington, DC 20224, or contact us at the Web site:                    *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The committee will be discussing Toll-free issues and public input is welcomed.                

Dated: September 1, 2017.

Antoinette Ross,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2017-19205 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      15,677,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,850,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     133,403,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             210,552,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      165,324,000
<BONDS>                                    115,638,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,160,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               210,552,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,857,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,084,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,232,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,773,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   603,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,170,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2021, Withdrawn, Appeal Permanently 

Abated, and Abatement Order Filed September 14, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00470-CR

MARTEL SHANIDI BLACK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 5

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2224835

ABATEMENT ORDER

A jury convicted the appellant of assault and sentenced him to a term of 

confinement of 120 days in county jail. We issued a memorandum opinion on May 

27, 2021 affirming the trial court’s judgment of conviction. See Black v. State, No. 

14-20-00470-CR, 2021 WL 2153309 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 27, 

2021, pet. dism’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Appellant died after 

the opinion was issued and before this court issued its mandate, while his petition 
2

for discretionary review was pending before the Court of Criminal Appeals. The 

Court of Criminal Appeals accordingly dismissed the appellant’s petition and 

ordered the appeal permanently abated and our prior opinion withdrawn. Black v. 

State, 2021 WL 3745362 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 25, 2021, order) (not designated 

for publication). The death of an appellant during the pendency of an appeal 

deprives this court of jurisdiction. See Ryan v. State, 891 S.W.2d 275, 275 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1994).

Accordingly, this court’s opinion filed May 27, 2021, is withdrawn, and the 

appeal is permanently abated.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Geron Corporation (the Company) hereby
certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

| | (i)  |  | the accompanying quarterly report
      on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and nine months ended September
      30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                          

Dated: October 31, 2008

|/s/ THOMAS B.
      OKARMA            | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Thomas B. Okarma                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Geron Corporation and
will be retained by Geron Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---