alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18993]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Members of SGIP 2.0, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 20, 2017, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Members of SGIP 2.0, Inc. 
(``MSGIP 2.0'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Spark Cognition, Austin, TX; and Steve Ray Consulting, 
Menlo Park, CA, have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, Ameren Services, St. Louis, MO; Artis Energy (Formerly NXEGEN 
LLC), Middletown, CT; Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA; 
Consumer Electronics Association, Arlington, VA; Elevate Energy, 
Chicago, IL; India Smart Grid Forum, New Delhi, INDIA; Korea Smart Grid 
Institute, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Lawrence Berkeley National 
Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA; NEXTera Energy, Juno Beach, FL; Oracle 
Utilities (Formerly Opower), Arlington, VA; PJM Interconnection, 
Norristown, PA; Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Columbus, OH; 
Rebecca Herold and Associates, Van Meter, IA; Reilly Associates, Red 
Bank, NJ; Smart Grid Operations Consulting, Sunnyvale, CA; Softgrids, 
Puteaux, FRANCE; Sustainable Resources Management, Toronto, CANADA; 
Telecommunications Technology Association, Gyeonggi-do, REPUBLIC OF 
KOREA; Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hooker, OK; and Wedin 
Communications, Plymouth, MN, have withdrawn as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and MSGIP 2.0 intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 5, 2013, MSGIP 2.0 filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on March 7, 2013 (78 FR 14836).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 24, 
2017. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 27, 2017 (82 FR 15238).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-18993 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,184
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,314<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     42,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,265
<PP&E>                                          18,136<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,997
<SALES>                                        157,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,436
<CGS>                                           87,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   207
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,915
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,920
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,995
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,995
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS NET AMOUNT
<F2>REPRESENTS NET AMOUNT 
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellant,

v.

ERLINDA LUJAN,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 0003 6

- CR

Appeal from

243rd District Court

of El Paso Co unty, Texas

(TC # 20160D0 4874 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the part

of the judgment suppressing the third statement (Exhibit 3 and 3a). We therefore reverse that part

of the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for further proceedings, in accordance

with the opinion of this Court.

The order suppressing the second recording (Exhibit 2 and 2a) is affirmed. This decisio n

shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 984 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 984

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide Medicare 
 beneficiary access to eye tracking accessories for speech generating 
  devices and to remove the rental cap for durable medical equipment 
 under the Medicare Program with respect to speech generating devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Steve Gleason Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDING MEDICARE BENEFICIARY ACCESS TO EYE TRACKING 
              ACCESSORIES FOR SPEECH GENERATING DEVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(n) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended by inserting ``and eye tracking and gaze 
interaction accessories for speech generating devices furnished to 
individuals with a demonstrated medical need for such accessories'' 
after ``appropriate organizations)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to devices furnished on or after January 1, 2016.

SEC. 3. REMOVING THE RENTAL CAP FOR DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT UNDER 
              MEDICARE WITH RESPECT TO SPEECH GENERATING DEVICES.

    Section 1834(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395m(a)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (iii), by adding ``or'' at the end; and
            (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following new 
        clause:
                            ``(iv) in the case of devices furnished on 
                        or after October 1, 2015, and before October 1, 
                        2018, which serves as a speech generating 
                        device or which is an accessory that is needed 
                        for the individual to effectively utilize such 
                        a device,''.

            Passed the Senate April 22, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 984

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide Medicare 
 beneficiary access to eye tracking accessories for speech generating 
  devices and to remove the rental cap for durable medical equipment 
 under the Medicare Program with respect to speech generating devices.
```
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1636

___________ Ronnie E. Johnson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Floyd E. Emerson, Sr.; Vickie D. * Gilliam; Walter E. Hussman, Jr.; * [UNPUBLISHED] The Sentinel-Record, Inc.; Palmer * Newspaper Group; Wehco Media, Inc.; * Williams & Anderson, LLP; Jess * Askew, III; John Does, 1-10; Jane * Does, 1-11; John Does, 1-11, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 7, 2004 Filed: October 15, 2004

___________ Before WOLLMAN, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. -2- Ronnie E. Johnson (Johnson) appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his civil complaint brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. Having carefully reviewed the record, seeGardner v. First Am. Title Ins. Co. , 294 F.3d 991, 993 (8th Cir. 2002), we conclude the dismissal was appropriate, and an extended discussion is not warranted. To the extent Johnson is appealing the denial of his motion for appointment of counsel, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Stevens v. Redwing , 146 F.3d 538, 546 (8th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6814

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANDRE D. MINOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-89-82, CA-96-120-3)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre D. Minor, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterroism and

Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat.

1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Minor, Nos. CR-89-82; CA-96-12-3 (E.D. Va. May 9,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Statement of
Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,102
<PP&E>                                       2,150,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                 610,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,667,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,667,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,667,983
<SALES>                                        196,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               229,625
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               155,815
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             73,810
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    73,810
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.71
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

L-3 National Security Solutions, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912CM-05-D-0011 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59778 

W. Jay De Vecchio, Esq. 

Edward Jackson, Esq. 

Jenner & Block LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Gregory T. Allen, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 2 June 2015 ,,Y/7-? / 

L~~ 1{1;;1f- MARK N. STEMPLER7 7 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59778, Appeal ofL-3 National 

Security Solutions, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 28 

To establish the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies 

for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice President-elect of 

the United States on January 20, 2017. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 20, 2016 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To establish the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 

Ceremonies for the inauguration of the President-elect 

and Vice President-elect of the United States on January 

20, 2017. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF JOINT COMMITTEE. 

4 There is established a Joint Congressional Committee 

5 on Inaugural Ceremonies (in this resolution referred to as 

6 the ‘‘joint committee’’) consisting of 3 Senators and 3 

7 Members of the House of Representatives, to be appointed 

8 by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 28 ATS 

1 House of Representatives, respectively. The joint com2 mittee is authorized to make the necessary arrangements 

3 for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice Presi4 dent-elect of the United States on January 20, 2017. 

5 SEC. 2. SUPPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE. 

6 The joint committee— 

7 (1) is authorized to utilize appropriate equip8 ment and the services of appropriate personnel of 

9 departments and agencies of the Federal Govern10 ment, under arrangements between the joint com11 mittee and the heads of those departments and 

12 agencies, in connection with the inaugural pro13 ceedings and ceremonies; and 

14 (2) may accept gifts and donations of goods 

15 and services to carry out its responsibilities. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 168 (Thursday, August 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18513]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Federal Labor Relations Authority.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) publishes the 
names of the persons selected to serve on its SES Performance Review 
Board (PRB). This notice supersedes all previous notices of the PRB 
membership.

DATES: Upon publication.

ADDRESSES: Written comments about this final rule can be emailed to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d28030a0c0a081905082b213f2c2d0b011f0c430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f5b09b92949290819d90b3b9a7b4b593998794db929a83">[email protected]</span></a> or sent to the Case Intake and Publication 
Office, Federal Labor Relations Authority, 1400 K Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20424. All written comments will be available for public 
inspection during normal business hours at the Case Intake and 
Publication Office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina K. Grippando, Counsel for 
Regulatory and Public Affairs, Federal Labor Relations Authority, 
Washington, DC 20424, (202) 218-7776.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C. requires 
each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Office of Personnel Management, one or more PRBs. The PRB shall 
review and evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior executive's 
performance by the supervisor, along with any response by the senior 
executive, and make recommendations to the final rating authority 
relative to the performance of the senior executive.
    The persons named below have been selected to serve on the FLRA's 
PRB.

PRB Chairman:
    James T. Abbott, Chief Counsel to the Acting Chairman
PRB Members:
    Richard S. Jones, Regional Director, Atlanta Regional Office; 
Kimberly D. Moseley, Executive Director, Federal Service Impasses 
Panel; Peter A. Sutton, Acting General Counsel; William R. Tobey, Chief 
Counsel to Member DuBester.

    Dated: August 28, 2017.
Michael W. Jeffries,
Acting Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2017-18513 Filed 8-30-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2
            Section 1350 Certification -- Principal Financial Officer

                 Citizens Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citizens  Financial
Corporation  (the "Company") for the quarterly  period ended September 30, 2004,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Len E.  Schweitzer,  Vice  President  and Treasurer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  s.s. 1350, as adopted pursuant to s.s. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.       The  Report  fully complies  with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects,  the financial  condition and  results of  operations  of the
Company.


                                          By:       /s/ Len E. Schweitzer
                                                    ----------------------------

                                                    Vice President and Treasurer

Date: November 9, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Citizens Financial Corporation and
will be retained by CFC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be  considered  filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 37 

Recognizing the George C. Marshall Museum and George C. Marshall Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, as the National George C. Marshall Museum and Library. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2016 

Mr. KAINE (for himself and Mr. WARNER) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the George C. Marshall Museum and George 

C. Marshall Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, 

as the National George C. Marshall Museum and Library. 

Whereas General George C. Marshall served as Army Chief 

of Staff during World War II, Special Ambassador to 

China, Secretary of State, and Secretary of Defense; 

Whereas General George C. Marshall was promoted to General of the Army in 1944, one of only five Army five-star 

generals in the history of the United States; 

Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal in 1946 for his military strategy 

and vital role during World War II; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 37 IS 

Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Nobel 

Peace Prize in 1953 for developing the European economic recovery strategy known as the Marshall Plan; 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation was established 

in 1953 and is devoted to preserving the legacy of General George C. Marshall through educational scholarship 

programs and facilities; 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation opened the 

George C. Marshall Museum and George C. Marshall Research Library in 1964 in Lexington, Virginia, on the 

post of the Virginia Military Institute, which is the alma 

mater of General George C. Marshall; 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Museum educates the public 

about the military and diplomatic contributions of General George C. Marshall through extensive exhibits; and 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Research Library maintains 

the most comprehensive collection of records documenting 

the life and leadership of General George C. Marshall: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes the George C. Mar3 shall Museum and George C. Marshall Research Library 

4 in Lexington, Virginia, as the National George C. Mar5 shall Museum and Library. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS