alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) Rialto 

         CAPITAL

 

 

**2017Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") datedas of June l, 2013 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank NationalAssociation as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust2013-C14, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C14 **(WFRBS2013-C14)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to thefollowing:

 

l.All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicerfor the period of January l, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the "ReportingPeriod") in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has beenconducted under my supervision.

 

3.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, eachfailure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identifiedherein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer                                                                                                             Date: March 1, 2018

AdamSinger, Managing Director
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 14 

Electing Laura C. Dove, of Virginia, as Secretary for the Majority of the 

Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Electing Laura C. Dove, of Virginia, as Secretary for the 

Majority of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That Laura C. Dove of Virginia be, and she 

2 is hereby, elected Secretary for the Majority of the Senate. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the Quarterly Report of Croghan Bancshares, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Elder, Vice President of theCorporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchangeAct of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial conditionand results of operations of the Corporation.   Date: July 21, 2006 /s/ Thomas J. Elder     Thomas J. Elder, Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.0

Computation of Earnings per Share

The following represents the computation of earnings per share reflecting the
assumption that the granted shares under the option and warrants plan which
would be dilutive will be exercised.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
                                              ---------------------------   -------------------------
                                                   2006          2005           2006          2005
                                               -----------   -----------    -----------   -----------
<S>                                           <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>
Net earnings applicable to common
   shareholders, basic                         $   727,474   $   498,183    $ 1,290,737   $ 1,126,117
Add: Dividend to preferred shareholders                 --        21,600         96,410        43,200
Less: Change in fair value of warrants            (406,694)           --       (841,215)           --
                                               -----------   -----------    -----------   -----------
Net earnings, diluted                          $   320,780   $   519,783    $   545,932   $ 1,169,317
                                               ===========   ===========    ===========   ===========
Weighted average common shares
   outstanding, basic                           18,931,169    12,652,370     17,005,769    12,636,465
Common share equivalents relating to:
   Preferred stock                                      --     2,157,480      1,916,022     2,142,767
   Stock options                                   719,502       671,434        786,722       689,647
   Warrants                                        660,158     1,137,713        597,161     1,148,974
                                               -----------   -----------    -----------   -----------
Weighted average common shares outstanding      20,310,829    16,618,997     20,305,674    16,617,853
                                               ===========   ===========    ===========   ===========
Net earnings per share:
   Basic                                       $      0.04   $      0.04    $      0.08   $      0.09
   Diluted                                     $      0.02   $      0.03    $      0.03   $      0.07

Anti-dilutive preferred stock, stock
   options and warrants not included in the
   diluted earnings per share computations       1,955,272       450,000      1,988,270       375,000
</TABLE>

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
exhibit10_26.htm


Exhibit 10.26





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 







  





  











  






 







  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 







  





  











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first set forth above.


 




	
LANDLORD:


MSCP Capital Center Investors, LLC,


a Delaware limited liability company


By: Divco West Real Estate Services, Inc.,


a Delaware corporation


Its Agent

	 	 	
TENANT:


InsWeb Corporation,


a Delaware corporation

	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ James Teng

	 	 	
/s/ L. Eric Loewe

	 
	
Name:  James Teng

	 	 	
Name:  L. Eric Loewe

	 
	
Title:  Managing Director

	 	 	
Title:  SVP, General Counsel and Secretary

	 







 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


7
Press Release.
 
     Data Research Associates Announces Stock Repurchase Plan

ST. LOUIS, July 17  -- Data Research Associates, Inc. (Nasdaq:DRAI) announced 
today that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of its Common 
Stock in an aggregate amount of up to $4 million in purchase price.
Purchases would be made from time to time over the next twelve months in the 
open market and through privately negotiated transactions, subject to general
market and other conditions. The buyback would be financed out of existing 
cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. As of the June 30 conclusion
of the company's third fiscal quarter, these totaled $17.1 million (unaudited),
and the company had no long-term debt. 

"This plan reflects the board's confidence in our long-term prospects," 
said Michael J. Mellinger, Chairman, President and CEO. "We view the repurchase
of our shares as an attractive investment opportunity and a further means of 
returning value to our shareholders."

DRA, headquartered in St. Louis, is a leading systems integrator for libraries 
and other information providers, offering its own proprietary information 
services software; third-party software and hardware; Internet, World Wide Web 
and other networking services; and other related support services. Its World 
Wide Web page is located at http://www.dra.com.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10685

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL ANTONIO MIRANDA-ARROYO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CR-3-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul Antonio

Miranda-Arroyo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Miranda-Arroyo has

not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Amendment to Servicing Agreement



 Exhibit 10.11(a) 

SCHEDULE A 

to the 

Servicing Agreement 
 Amended March 1, 2009 
 Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund, Series II (f/k/a The
Henlopen Fund) 
 Hennessy Select Large Value Fund 
 Hennessy Cornerstone Large Growth Fund
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2019

p0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2019

157713

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157713

COA: 342807

Ingham CC: 15

- 001143

- FH

DEREK CHRISTOPHER ARMSTRONG,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of October 30, 2018, the appl ication for leave to appeal the April 24,

2018 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People

v Dixon

- Bey (Docket No. 156746). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been

denied in Dixon

- Bey on July 29, 2019, ___ Mich ___ (2019), the application is again

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented

should be reviewed by this Court.
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### Performance Motor Racing, L.L.C. v. Scuderia Maranello Motorsports, Inc.

October 21, 2002

Case No. (Law) 206460

BY JUDGE ROBERT W. WOOLDRIDGE, JR.

This matter came before the Court on October 18,2002, on Performance Motor Racing, L.L.C.’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment in the above referenced matter. After oral argument, I took the matter under advisement to consider issues related to service of the present motion and the underlying Petition to Compel Arbitration.

I have reviewed the pleadings in this matter and the relevant statutes governing service of process in the Commonwealth of Virginia. I find that Performance Motor Racing, L.L.C., has failed to properly serve defendant Scuderia Maranello Motorsports, Inc. Performance Motor Racing, LL.C.’s attempted substituted service of the present motion and the underlying Petition to Compel Arbitration is invalid. Pursuant to Virginia Code § 8.01-301, process on a foreign corporation may be served personally on an officer, director, or on the registered agent of a foreign corporation which is authorized to do business in the Commonwealth. Even if Arthur Verbin is an officer of the Defendant corporation, he must be personally served (not served by posting) to effect service on the corporation.

In addition, Performance Motor Racing, L.L.C.’s attempted substituted service of the present motion and the underlying Petition to Compel Arbitration pursuant to Va. Code Ann. 8.01-296(B) is insufficient for want of a proper certificate of mailing, which is to include statutory language defining *247the expiration of the statutory period within which Scuderia Maranello Motorsports, Inc., is to respond.

Therefore, Performance Motor Racing, L.L.C.’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment is denied.
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |  |  |  |                         |                         
|---- |  |  |  |  | ----------------------- | ------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |                         | Corporate Trust Services
|     |  |  |  |  | MAC R1204-010          
|     |  |  |  |  | 9062 Old Annapolis Road
|     |  |  |  |  | Columbia, MD 21045     
|     |  |  |  |  | Tel: 410 884 2000      
|     |  |  |  |  | Fax: 410 715 2380      

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-7 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-7

Per the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|                   |  | 
|------------------ |  | 
|February 24, 2015 
|                  
|/s/ Kristen Cronin
|Kristen Cronin    
|Vice President    



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
Exhibit 10.1 8-K/A Director's Compensation








Exhibit 10.1
      


FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON 
2012 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY


A fee of $5,575 per meeting shall be paid to all Directors that attend all or part of a meeting of the Board of Directors.  A fee of $6,300 per meeting shall be paid to the chair of all committees except for the chair of the Audit Committee which shall be $7,000 per meeting.  A fee of $7,000 per meeting shall be paid to the vice chair of the Board.  A fee of $7,750 per meeting shall be paid to the chair of the Board.  This fee shall also be provided to any person elected by the Board to serve as chairman pro tempore or to the vice chair if the vice chair presides for an entire meeting of the Board.  There are eight regularly scheduled meetings in 2012.


A fee of $2,000 per meeting shall be paid to all committee members, including ex officio members, who attend all or any part of any meeting of a committee of the Board.    


A fee of $1,325 per meeting shall be paid to any Director for participation in telephonic conference calls or when participating by telephone for all or any part of a meeting in which the Director would be entitled to receive a meeting fee for in-person attendance at such meeting.


Fees shall be paid per meeting.  For example, if a Board meeting and committee meeting occur on the same day, a separate fee shall be payable for attendance at each meeting.  Additionally, in the case of a multi-day meeting, a separate fee shall be payable for each day's attendance at the same meeting.


In the event that inclement weather prevents the occurrence of a planned meeting of the Board or one of its committees, the Directors shall be entitled to receive the applicable meeting fee called for in the Statement of Policy, minus any fees received if an in-person meeting is changed to a telephonic meeting. 


Maximum Fees


The maximum fees for 2012 for the Chair shall be $60,000, for the Vice Chair $55,000, for the Chair of the Audit Committee $55,000, for all other Committee Chairs $50,000, and for Directors $45,000.  


Administrative Matters


The Personnel Committee shall annually review this policy and shall submit its recommendation to the Board.  The Board shall consider the recommendations of the Personnel Committee and shall approve the policy no later than required to allow for submission, review and approval of the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), if required, to ensure that directors are paid timely for the first regularly scheduled meeting of the Board in which the policy shall apply.  The Board is authorized, in its sole discretion, to interpret the provisions of the policy and to address situations not anticipated or covered by this policy as it determines to be appropriate, consistent with the requirements set forth in the regulations promulgated by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, if any.
Exhibit 10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 [Company Letter Head] 
 July 25, 2011 

Gregory J. Divis 
 One Corporate Woods Drive

 Bridgeton, MO 63044 
 Dear Greg:

 This letter agreement shall amend certain sections (as listed below) of the Employment Agreement dated November 19, 2009 between you and
KV Pharmaceutical Company (the “Employment Agreement”). The following amendments shall be made and effective upon approval by the Board of Directors and your signature below. 

 

	 	1.	Section 1.(a) Employment : Your title shall be changed to President and Chief Executive Officer to reflect your promotion on 11/17/10.


  

	 	2.	Section 3.(a) Base Salary : Your Base Salary shall be $520,000.00 per annum. (This Base Salary increase will be retro-active to your appointment as
President and Chief Executive Officer effective 11/17/2010). 

  

	 	3.	Section 3.(c) Annual Cash Incentive : Your target Annual Cash Incentive shall be 60% of your Base Salary. 


 

	 	4.	Section 3.(f) Vacation : You will be entitled to 25 days of vacation in accordance with the terms of your Employment Agreement.


  

	 	5.	Section 4.(f)(2) and (3) Payments to the Executive Upon Termination of Employment : These sections are hereby modified to reflect the amount which
shall be equal to two (2) times the sum your current Base Salary plus two (2) times your target Annual Cash Incentive or 60% for each year one is not set. 


 

	 	6.	You shall be entitled to participate in the Company’s Executive Fleet Program. 

 All capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning assigned to them in your Employment Agreement. 
 Sincerely, 
 /s/ Chris Dumm 
 Chris Dumm 
 Director, Human Resources 
 ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED BY: 
  

							
	 /s/ Greg Divis
	 		 		 	
	Gregory J. Divis	 		 		 	

 July 25, 2011
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aastrom Biosciences, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/Timothy M. MaylebenTimothy M. MaylebenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JAN 30 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JERRY P. MCNEIL;

MARIAN J. MCNEIL,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

COMMISSIONER OF THE

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE;

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

sued as: The Secretary of the Treasury

of the United States,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-5109

(D.C. No. 96-CV-624)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
-2-

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s decision dismissing the individual

defendants, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and granting the United States summary

judgment on the remaining claims. We review the district court’s dismissal of

the individual defendants de novo. See, e.g., Grossman v. Novell, Inc., 120 F.3d

1112, 1118 (10th Cir. 1997). So, too, do we review the district court’s summary

judgment decision de novo, viewing the record in the light most favorable to the

nonmoving party. See, e.g., J.B. v. Washington County, 127 F.3d 919, 923

(10th Cir. 1997). Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no genuinely

disputed material issues of fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as

a matter of law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).

Upon consideration of the record and the parties’ briefs, we AFFIRM

the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District

of Oklahoma for substantially the reasons stated in that court’s order dated

May 15, 1997. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Stephen H. Anderson 

Circuit Judge
#### Noreen A. Louey et al., Appellants, v Doris L. Auger, Respondent.

[610 NYS2d 889]

—Appeal from an order of thé Supreme Court (Ryan, Jr., J.), entered June 4, 1993 in Franklin County, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Plaintiff Noreen A. Louey commenced this action for damages suffered when she was hit by a vehicle operated by defendant as she attempted to cross a street. She subsequently moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. Supreme Court properly found that questions of fact exist as to liability, including whether Louey suffered a "serious injury” as defined in the Insurance Law.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.