alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18385]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10107]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: ``Renoir and Friends: Luncheon of the 
Boating Party'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Renoir and Friends: Luncheon of the Boating Party,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Phillips 
Collection, Washington, District of Columbia, from on or about October 
7, 2017, until on or about January 7, 2018, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the 
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a293f392e333534686e6f631a292e3b2e3f743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="097a6c6a7d6066673b3d3c30497a7d687d6c276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. Department 
of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of 
December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
determinations be published in the Federal Register.

 Alyson Grunder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-18385 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT D. ENGEL, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2595

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed May 29, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Charles Sniffen, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Megan Olson, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 5, 2018.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00015

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A .G. AND V.G., CHILDR EN
On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469

- 52594

- 2016


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justice Bridges, Myers, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck Before the Court is appellant’s motion to extend time to file the notice of ap peal. Generally, a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the judgment is signed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.1. However, if a timely motion for new trial is filed, the notice of appeal is due within ninety days of

the date the judgment is signed

. Id. 26.1(a). The deadline may be extended if the notice of appeal is filed within fifteen days of the date it was due and an extension motion providing a reasonable explanation for the delay is filed. See id. 10.5(b), 26.3. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, an appellate court lacks jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 25.1(b). Here, appellant challenges the trial court’s final decree of divorce signed on September 8,

2017. The record before us reflects a ppellant timely filed a motion for new trial on October 6,

2017. See T EX

. R. C IV . P. 329b(a). Because the motion for new trial was timely, the notice of appeal was due on December 7, 2017 or, with an extension motion, on December 22, 2017

. See– 2

–

T EX

. R. A PP . P. 26.1 (a) , 26.3

. Appellant , however, did not file his n otice of appeal until January
4, 2018

. Because appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal, we deny the motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

.
P. 42.3(a).

180015F.P05 /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G. AND V.G., CHILDREN

No. 05

- 18

- 00015

- CV On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469

- 52594

- 2016. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. Justices Bridges and Myers participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS th is appeal.

It is ORDERED that appellee Jamie McDonald recover her costs of this appeal, if any, from appellant David Grantham.

Judgment entered this 5th day of February , 2018.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________ No. 07 - 1 8 - 00277 - CV

________________________ STEPHEN PATRICK BLACK , APPELLANT

V. BRIAN THOMAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 1 54 th District Court Lamb C ounty, Texas Trial Court No. DCV

- 19 , 873 - 18 ; Honorable Felix Klein , Presiding August 8 , 201 8 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE , JJ. Pending before this c ourt is a motion to dismiss filed by Appellant, Stephen Patrick Black , proceeding in forma pauperis . Without passing on the merits of the appeal, Appellant’s motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(1). Having dismissed this appeal at Appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Per Curiam
Exhibit 31

 

SEMT 2013-7

 

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

 

I, Garnet W. Kanouse, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-7 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: CoreLogic Solutions, LLC (“CoreLogic”), American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, “Assurant”), Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.

 

Date: March 27, 2020

 

 

/S/  Garnet W. Kanouse

Signature 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the previously filed
Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (Registration No. 333-43072) filed on August
4, 2000; S-3 (Registration No. 333-38698) filed on June 6, 2000; S-3
(Registration No. 333-33498) filed on March 29, 2000; S-8 (Registration No.
333-32226) filed on March 10, 2000; and S-8 (Registration No. 333-88541) filed
on October 6, 1999 of Inamed Corporation and Subsidiaries ("Inamed") of our
report dated January 21, 2000, relating to the consolidated financial statements
of Inamed appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.

                                             /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                                                 BDO Seidman, LLP

New York, New York
March, 2001
EX10.20








EXHIBIT 10.20




AMENDMENT TO THE
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN FOR
SENIOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES OF
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES


JULY 27, 2009


Effective as of the date first set forth above, Avago Technologies Limited (the “Company”) hereby amends the Equity Incentive Plan for Senior Management Employees of Avago Technologies Limited and Subsidiaries, as amended and restated effective as of February 25, 2008 (the “Plan”) to the extent necessary to provide as follows:


“Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, immediately upon a Public Offering, Sections 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the Plan shall be deemed to be deleted and of no further effect with respect to any Options or Shares held by any Employee.”
Except as provided in this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


**********
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for Mainstreet Bank, Forest Lake, Minnesota (“the Receiver”) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Mainstreet Bank on August 28, 2009. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated: August 23, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-18151 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
#### Regan R. REDDING, Claimant-Appellee, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 2006-7020.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 11, 2008.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs responds to the court’s November 20, 2007 order and requests that the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) in *Redding v. Nicholson,*04-0895 be summarily affirmed. Regan R. Redding has not responded.

The Secretary appealed from the CAVC’s decision, challenging the court’s placement of the burden on the Secretary of establishing that a 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) notification error was not prejudicial. In *Sanders v. Nicholson,*487 F.3d 881 (Fed. Cir.2007) this court held that any section 5103(a) error should be presumed prejudicial and the Secretary has the burden of rebutting this presumption. *Id.*at 891. Under these circumstances, summary affirmance is appropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The judgment of the CAVC is summarily affirmed. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40728 Summary Calendar

SAMUEL PASQUAL EDMONDSON Petitioner-Appellant

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CV-261
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Samuel Pasqual Edmondson, federal prisoner # 05102-010, has filed a pro se application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following the district court’s dismissal, for lack ofjurisdiction, of his pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. That petition challenged the validity of his convictions for: United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D February 10, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk2

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine; and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. A movant for IFP on appeal must show: he is a pauper; and he will present a nonfrivolous appellate issue. E .g., Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep’t, 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). Edmondson cannot establish that he would raise a nonfrivolous appellate issue. Edmondson essentially maintains his claimsfall within the savings clause of28 U.S.C. § 2255 because Zedner v. United States, 547 U.S. 489 (2006), should apply retroactively to cases on collateral review. We may, however, consider a § 2241 petition attacking custody resulting from a federally-i mposed sentence only when the petitioner establishes that § 2255 is “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention”. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e); J effers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir. 2001). To show § 2255 was rendered inadequate or ineffective in his case, Edmondson must show that his claim: (1) “is based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision w hich establishes that the petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense ”; and (2) “was foreclosed by circuit law at the time when the claim should have been raised in the petitioner’s trial, appeal, or first § 2255 motion”. R eyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001) (emphasis added). Zedner dealt with issues relating to the Speedy Trial Act. See Zedner, 547 U.S. at 500-09; Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174. Because Zedner does not establish that Edmondson was convicted of a nonexistent offense, we need not determine whether Z edner is retroactive or whether his claim was foreclosed when he filed his direct appeal or prior § 2255 motion. Because Edmondson has not met the requirements for proceeding under the savings clause, he has not established that he will raise a nonfrivolous appellate issue. SeeJackson, 811 F.2d at 261. Accordingly, Edmondson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED; and his appeal is3

DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5

TH C IR
. R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-2368-000]


GenOn Holdco 3, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding 
GenOn Holdco 3, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 25, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0f6f5e2f3ffdedcd9ded5e3c5c0c0dfc2c4f0d6d5c2d39ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="397f7c6b7a76575550575c6a4c4949564b4d795f5c4b5a175e564f">[email protected]</span></a> or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: September 5, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19150 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 3 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.3
                                          Agreed to May 18, 2015        

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF 
              KING KAMEHAMEHA.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on June 7, 2015, to celebrate the 
birthday of King Kamehameha I.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# DATES AND TIMES:

Tuesday, September 12, 2017, at 8:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

### Tuesday, September 12, 2017, at 8:00 a.m.

1. Financial Matters.

2. Strategic Issues.

3. Personnel and Compensation Items.

4. Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Temporary Emergency Committee governance.

# GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION:

The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-19021 Filed 9-1-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P