alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                           21411
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    11604
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     254551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                304110
<PP&E>                                          160101
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  622773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           265623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                    (295331)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    622773
<SALES>                                         267371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                269470
<CGS>                                           187713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   187713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                110469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (31993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (31993)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (31993)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.81)
        

</TABLE>
MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 379TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on July 12, 2017, the cause upon appeal to revise 

or reverse your judgment between

Devone Christian-Ali Hibbler, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-17-00288-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2017CR1410

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth 

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, 

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on September 20, 2017.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
_________________ 

_________________ 

Cite as: 574 U. S. ____ (2014) 1 

ALITO, J., dissenting 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

No. 14A352 

RUTHELLE FRANK, ET AL. v. SCOTT WALKER 

GOVERNOR OF WISCONSIN, ET AL. 

ON APPLICATION TO VACATE STAY 

[October 9, 2014] 

The application to vacate the September 12, 2014 order 

of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh

Circuit presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to

the Court is granted and the Seventh Circuit’s stay of the 

district court’s permanent injunction is vacated pending

the timely filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of 

certiorari respecting case Nos. 14-2058 & 14-2059. Should 

the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this order

shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition

for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order shall terminate 

upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court 

JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE SCALIA and JUSTICE 

THOMAS join, dissenting. 

There is a colorable basis for the Court’s decision due to 

the proximity of the upcoming general election. It is particularly troubling that absentee ballots have been sent

out without any notation that proof of photo identification

must be submitted. But this Court “may not vacate a stay 

entered by a court of appeals unless that court clearly and

‘demonstrably’ erred in its application of ‘accepted standards.’” Planned Parenthood of Greater Tex. Surgical 

Health Servs. v. Abbott, 571 U. S. ___, ___ (2013) (slip op., 

at 1) (SCALIA, J., concurring in denial of application to

vacate stay) (quoting Western Airlines, Inc. v. Teamsters, 

480 U. S. 1301, 1305 (1987) (O’Connor, J., in chambers);

some internal quotation marks omitted). Under that test, 

the application in this case should be denied.
OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

 

I, Karen Montbach, a ManagingDirector of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”), hereby certify, with respect to the Trust and Servicing Agreement, datedas of May 6, 2013 , (the “Agreement”), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as depositor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer and special servicer, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the “CertificateAdministrator”), and U.S. Bank, National Association, as trustee, the following:

 

1.       A review of the Company’s activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2016 andits performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2016, the Company has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorizedofficer of the Company and not in the undersigned’s individual capacity.

 

Date:	February 27, 2017

 

Citibank, N.A.

 

 

By: /s/ Karen Montbach      

Name: Karen Montbach

Title:   Managing Director
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 652 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for the more accurate 

and complete enumeration of members of the Armed Forces in any 

tabulation of total population by the Secretary of Commerce, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 4, 2015 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for the 

more accurate and complete enumeration of members 

of the Armed Forces in any tabulation of total population 

by the Secretary of Commerce, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service Members and 

5 Communities Count Act of 2014’’. 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 652 IS

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVED ENUMERATION OF MEMBERS OF THE 

2 ARMED FORCES IN ANY TABULATION OF 

3 TOTAL POPULATION BY SECRETARY OF COM4 MERCE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 141 of title 13, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub8 section (h); and 

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(g) Effective beginning with the 2020 decennial cen12 sus of population, in taking any tabulation of total popu13 lation by States, the Secretary shall take appropriate 

14 measures to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, 

15 that all members of the Armed Forces deployed abroad 

16 on the date of taking such tabulation are— 

17 ‘‘(1) fully and accurately counted; and 

18 ‘‘(2) properly attributed to the State in which 

19 their residence at their permanent duty station or 

20 homeport is located on such date.’’. 

21 (b) CONSTRUCTION.—The amendments made by sub22 section (a) shall not be construed to affect the residency 

23 status of any member of the Armed Forces under any pro24 vision of law other than title 13, United States Code. 

Æ 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald Bady, Appellant.

[608 NYS2d 679]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered April 4, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, burglary in the second degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the third degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by (1) reversing the conviction of robbery in the first degree and vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and (2) reversing the conviction of attempted robbery in the first degree, and vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new trial on those charges, to be preceded by an independent source hearing on the charge of attempted robbery in the first degree. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

We agree with the defendant’s contention that the lineup procedure with respect to one of the victims in this case was unduly suggestive because he was the only lineup participant wearing a red shirt, which had figured prominently in the victim’s description of the perpetrator *(see, People v Owens,*74 NY2d 677, 678; *People v Lloyd,*108 AD2d 873, *affd*66 NY2d 964; *People v Sapp,*98 AD2d 784; *People v Johnson,*79 AD2d 617, 618). Additionally, because the victim did not testify at the *Wade*hearing, there is no basis to find an independent source for the identification of the defendant, and there must be a new trial on the charge of attempted robbery in the first degree *(see, People v Burts,*78 NY2d 20, 24-25; *People v Dodt,*61 NY2d 408, 417).

We also agree with the defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in failing to give a charge regarding the affirmative defense to robbery in the first degree, specifically that the object displayed was not a loaded weapon capable of producing death or serious physical injury *(see, People v Gilliard,*72 NY2d 877, 878). Although the defense counsel did not ask for an affirmative defense charge on this ground, his request that the court charge the lesser-included offenses of robbery in the second degree and robbery in the third degree was denied. *441Consequently, we vacate the conviction of robbery in the first degree and remit the matter for a new trial on this count.

Moreover, we find that the defendant’s sentence on the remaining counts was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6867

DARRELL L. GOSS, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

SCOTT S. HARRIS, U.S. Supreme Court Clerk, 

Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00218-BHH) 

Submitted: September 14, 2021 Decided: September 20, 2021

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Darrell L. Goss, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Darrell L. Goss appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of 

the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Goss v. Harris, No. 2:21-cv-00218-BHH (D.S.C. May 5, 2021). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 155 

Establishing May 2, 2015, as a Day of Recognition for Ebola Orphans 

to express support for the children and families affected by the 2014 

Ebola outbreak in West Africa by promoting awareness of the children 

of West Africa who have been orphaned by the 2014 Ebola epidemic, 

celebrating those who have recognized and are working to fulfill the 

needs of those children, and encouraging the people of the United States 

to continue to support the people of West Africa. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2015 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MAY 5, 2015 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Establishing May 2, 2015, as a Day of Recognition for 

Ebola Orphans to express support for the children and 

families affected by the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West 

Africa by promoting awareness of the children of West 

Africa who have been orphaned by the 2014 Ebola epidemic, celebrating those who have recognized and are 

working to fulfill the needs of those children, and encouraging the people of the United States to continue to 

support the people of West Africa. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 155 ATS 

Whereas the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa reached 

epidemic proportions; 

Whereas the World Health Organization reports that there 

have been over 14,800 laboratory-confirmed cases of 

Ebola in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone as of April 

19, 2015; 

Whereas the World Health Organization reports that there 

have been over 10,800 deaths from Ebola in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone as of April 19, 2015; 

Whereas the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) estimates that as of February 2015, nearly 11,000 children 

in West Africa have lost 1 or both parents due to the 

2014 Ebola outbreak; 

Whereas some families reject Ebola orphans out of fear of 

the disease; 

Whereas the United States authorized $750,000,000 to support up to 3,000 United States troops in Monrovia, Liberia, to respond to the Ebola crisis; and 

Whereas United States citizens have given time and resources 

to assist the people of West Africa, including Ebola orphans: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes May 2, 2015, as a Day of Rec3 ognition for Ebola Orphans, to promote awareness 

4 of the children of West Africa orphaned by the 2014 

5 Ebola outbreak; 

6 (2) supports the goals and work of those who 

7 are addressing the developing Ebola orphan crisis in 

8 West Africa; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 155 ATS 

1 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to consider the needs of the children of West Africa 

3 who were orphaned by the 2014 Ebola epidemic. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,   SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                              --------------------------   --------------------------
                                                  1998          1997          1998            1997
                                              -----------    -----------   -----------    -----------
<S>                                           <C>            <C>           <C>            <C>
DETERMINATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
   FIXED CHARGES:

(Loss) earnings before (benefit) provision for
   income taxes and extraordinary charge      $  (630,062)   $ 1,763,399   $(3,992,395)   $ 3,409,035

Fixed charges
   Amortization of deferred financing costs       243,275                      328,435
   Interest expense                             2,876,107        785,492     4,392,314      1,557,587
                                              -----------    -----------   -----------    -----------
Earnings before fixed charges                   2,489,320      2,548,891       728,354      4,966,622

Fixed charges
   Amortization of deferred financing costs       243,275                      328,435
   Interest expense                             2,876,107        785,492     4,392,314      1,557,587
                                              -----------    -----------   -----------    -----------
Total fixed charges                             3,119,382        785,492     4,720,749      1,557,587

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  0.80X          3.24X         0.15X          3.19X
                                              ===========    ===========   ===========    ===========
</TABLE>

                                                                              18
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Health
Fitness Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2005 (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Jerry V. Noyce, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

/s/ Jerry V. Noyce

Jerry V. Noyce
Chief Executive Officer
May 16, 2005
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2013-2, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Backup Servicer, does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning onMarch 1, 2016and ending onFebruary 28, 2017and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 19th day of May, 2017 .





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Enrique Mayor-Mora


Enrique Mayor-Mora


Vice President and Treasurer
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 36 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to parental rights. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2016 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. BLUNT, and Mr. 

RISCH) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to parental rights. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 36 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The liberty of parents to direct the up3 bringing, education, and care of their children is a funda4 mental right. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. The parental right to direct education 

6 includes the right to choose, as an alternative to public 

7 education, private, religious, or home schools, and the 

8 right to make reasonable choices within public schools for 

9 one’s child. 

10 ‘‘SECTION 3. Neither the United States nor any State 

11 shall infringe these rights without demonstrating that its 

12 governmental interest as applied to the person is of the 

13 highest order and not otherwise served. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 4. The parental rights guaranteed by this 

15 article shall not be denied or abridged on account of dis16 ability. 

17 ‘‘SECTION 5. This article shall not be construed to 

18 apply to a parental action or decision that would end life. 

19 ‘‘SECTION 6. No treaty may be adopted nor shall any 

20 source of international law be employed to supersede, mod21 ify, interpret, or apply to the rights guaranteed by this 

22 article.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS