alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edmundo HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ; Angelica Maria Martin-Iniguez, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-71962.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dee. 20, 2007 **.

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Edmundo Hernandez-Gonzalez, Chandler, AZ, pro se.

Hugo F. Larios, Esq., Tempe, AZ, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Office of the District Chief Counsel, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, Kohsei Ugumori Fax, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*939Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Edmundo Hernandez-Gonzalez and Angelica Maria Martin-Iniguez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003).

Petitioners’ contention that their due process lights were violated because the IJ’s hardship finding was prejudiced by his good moral character finding does not state a colorable due process claim. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute color-able constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).

We do not consider Petitioners’ challenge to the IJ’s good moral character finding because the hardship finding is dispositive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

***

 ThiS disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for American Marine Bank, Bainbridge Island, Washington (“the Receiver”) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of American Marine Bank on January 29, 2010. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight  Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated: August 23, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-18152 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Operations
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          40,598
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,232
<PP&E>                                       2,221,662
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,940,479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 424,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     424,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   424,415
<SALES>                                         73,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,477
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,130
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,130
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,130
<EPS-BASIC>                                       7.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.66


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 987 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 987

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow deductions and 
  credits relating to expenditures in connection with marijuana sales 
                conducted in compliance with State law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2015

  Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mr. Merkley, and Mr. Bennet) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow deductions and 
  credits relating to expenditures in connection with marijuana sales 
                conducted in compliance with State law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Tax Equity Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTIONS AND CREDITS RELATING TO EXPENDITURES IN 
              CONNECTION WITH MARIJUANA SALES CONDUCTED IN COMPLIANCE 
              WITH STATE LAW.

    (a) In General.--Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, 
unless such trade or business consists of marijuana sales conducted in 
compliance with State law''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00397-CV 

IN RE CCPA ENTERPRISES, INC. 

AND RICKEY CONRADT 

 RELATORS

---------- 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

TRIAL COURT NO. 348-237051-09 

---------- 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

---------- 

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus, relators’ 

motion for temporary relief, and real party in interest’s responses to the petition 

and to the motion. We are of the opinion that all relief should be denied. 

Accordingly, we lift our November 13, 2017 stay of the trial court’s October 12, 

2017 “Order to Distribute Interpled Funds,” and we deny relators’ petition for writ 

of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM 

PANEL: KERR, J.; SUDDERTH, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J. 

DELIVERED: December 4, 2017

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 24(b)



<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 24(b)



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-76347) pertaining to the Employee Savings and Incentive Plan of
Consumers Energy Company and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-73922) of Consumers Energy Company and in the related Prospectus of our
report dated February 14, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Consumers Energy Company and subsidiaries included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Detroit, Michigan
February 14, 2003
| (logo) **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February6, 2019

 

RBSCommercial Funding, Inc. as Depositor

600Washington Blvd.

Stamford,CT 06901

 

RE:          AnnualStatement as to Compliance

                WFRBS2013 C13

 

DearSir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2013-C13, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerlyNCB, FSB (the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section11.12 thereof that:

 

a.       Areview of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the precedingcalendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer hasfulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Pleasenote that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover onor before March 31, 2019.

 

 

Bestregards,

/s/Karyn Mann

KarynMann

SeniorVice President, Investor Compliance

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A.
Exhibit 32.2

















CERTIFICATION








In connection with the annual report of OXIS International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Anthony J. Cataldo, Acting Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.











Date:  September 24, 2009                                                             /s/
Anthony J. Cataldo


Anthony J. CataldoActing Principal Accounting and


Financial Officer














A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Donald P. Gill, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First Ipswich
Bancorp;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; (3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The small business
issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
      including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
      within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
      is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
      business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
      or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
      to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ Donald P. Gill
----------------------------------
Donald P. Gill
Chief Executive Officer

May 12, 2006
EXHIBIT 35.2

SERVICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, the Series Supplement,
dated May 6, 2013, the US$ Note Trust Deed, dated May 7, 2013, and other transaction documents relating to SMART ABS Series 2013-2US Trust (collectively, the Agreements).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I, Alan Cameron, am a Director of Macquarie Securities Management Pty Limited (the Manager).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Managers activities during the period from May 22, 2013 (the date of issuance of the SMART ABS Series 2013-2US Trust) through March 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period), and
of its performance under each of the Agreements has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Manager has fulfilled all of its obligations under each of the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 25 June 2014



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alan Cameron                           
|Alan Cameron Director                      
|                                           
|Macquarie Securities Management Pty Limited
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Success Holding Group International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chi Jui Hong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 

| April 24, 2015 | By:    | */s/ Chi Jui Hong*                                |   |
|----------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|           |   | Chi Jui Hong                                           |   |
|           |   | Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
#### KURT M. JACHMANN CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. HARTLEY, COOPER & CO., Ltd., Harold B. Hill, George De H. Vaizey and Bevington, Vaizey *&*Foster, Ltd., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

Oct. 8, 1954.

Joseph S. Meadow and M. K. & R. Josephson, New York City, for plaintiff.

Webster Sheffield & Chrystie and Mendes & Mount, New York City, for defendants.

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion to vacate plaintiff’s notices to take the depositions of certain defendants. It is undisputed that these defendants are British subjects residing in England, and that their places of business are in England. The notices of examination would require them to appear for oral examination at the United States Courthouse in New York City. The proper place for taking the oral deposition of individual defendants is their residence, or of corporate defendants, their principal place of business. I think the plaintiff’s purpose would be adequately served at this time by means of written interrogatories If, on the return of the interrogatories and answers, they are shown to be insuffi*566cient, an application may then be made for taking their testimony by oral deposition. Isbrandsten v. Moller, D.C.N.Y.1947, 7 F.R.D. 188.

The motion to vacate plaintiff’s notices to take the depositions of certain defendants, which notices were served on September 21, 1954, is granted. So ordered.
**EXHIBIT 11.0**Computation of Earnings per ShareThe following represents the computation of earnings per share reflecting the assumption that thegranted shares under the option and warrants plan which would be dilutive will be exercised .           Three Months Ended   March 31   2007  2006 Net earnings applicable to common shareholders – basic $511,667  $563,263          Add: Dividend to preferred shareholders  —   96,410          Less: Change in fair value of warrants  —   (434,521)                Net earnings – diluted  511,667  $225,152                 Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic  19,306,797   15,001,832          Common share equivalents relating to: stock options,warrants and preferred stock        Preferred stock  —   3,910,000 Stock options  672,625   27,365 Warrants  239,725   727,744 Restricted stock  32,963   —                 Weighted average common shares outstanding  20,252,110   19,666,941                 Net Earnings Per Share:        Basic $0.03  $0.04 Diluted $0.03  $0.01          Anti-dilutive options, warrants and preferred stocknot included in the diluted earnings per sharecomputations  520,000   824,798
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133951 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133951 

 COA: 272877 

Wayne CC: 01-007696-03 

TAUHEED WILDER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk