Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 174 / Monday, September 11, 2017 / Notices 42703 

the date of this sale notice (43 CFR 

3473.2). 

A lease issued as a result of this 

offering will provide for payment of an 

annual rental of $3 per acre, or fraction 

thereof, and a royalty payable to the 

United States of 12.5 percent of the 

value of coal mined by surface methods 

and 8 percent of the value of coal mined 

by underground methods. Bidding 

instructions for the tract offered and the 

terms and conditions of the proposed 

coal lease are included in the Detailed 

Statement of Lease Sale. Copies of the 

statement and the proposed coal lease 

are available at the Montana-Dakotas 

State Office. Casefile NDM 107039 is 

also available for public inspection at 

the Montana-Dakotas State Office. 

(Authority: 43 CFR 3422.3–2) 

Richard M. Hotaling, 

Acting Associate State Director. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19179 Filed 9–8–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–DN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–PWR–PWRO–23152; PPPWGOGAP0 

PPMPSAS1Z.YP0000] 

Final Environmental Impact Statement 

for Vista Grande Drainage Basin 

Improvement Project, Golden Gate 

National Recreation Area, San 

Francisco and San Mateo Counties, 

California 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: The National Park Service 

(NPS) announces the availability of the 

Final Environmental Impact Statement 

(Final EIS) for the proposed Vista 

Grande Drainage Basin Project (Project), 

prepared in cooperation with the City of 

Daly City (Daly City). The Final EIS 

incorporates the Final Environmental 

Impact Report (EIR) prepared by Daly 

City. Daly City is seeking a Special Use 

Permit from the NPS for construction 

activities proposed at Fort Funston, a 

possible Right of Way approval for 

outfall-related infrastructure on the 

beach below Fort Funston, and 

modernization of an existing easement 

to clarify the rights and obligations of 

the parties with regard to proposed 

structures within Fort Funston. 

DATES: The NPS will execute a Record 

of Decision no sooner than 30 days after 

the date of publication by the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

of the notice of filing and availability of 

the Final EIS in the Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Please contact Steve Ortega at the 

Golden Gate National Recreation Area 

(GGNRA) Planning Division at (415) 

561–4930 or goga_planning@nps.gov. 

ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the 

Final EIS is available on the project Web 

site (http://parkplanning.nps.gov/Vista_

Grande). A limited number of printed 

copies of the Final EIS are available for 

public inspection, and may be requested 

by contacting the GGNRA Planning 

Division as noted above. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

purpose and need for the Project is to 

alleviate flooding in the Vista Grande 

Drainage Basin and Canal and provide 

a sustainable source of water for 

management of Lake Merced water 

levels and quality, and to ensure that 

the portion of the Project within 

federally managed lands, if authorized, 

is constructed, operated, and 

maintained in a manner that is 

consistent with the protection and 

enhancement of resources, values, and 

uses of lands and waters under federal 

jurisdiction. NPS’s objectives for the 

Project include the following: (1) Avoid, 

minimize, or mitigate environmental 

impacts to Park natural and cultural 

resources; (2) during construction, 

ensure the health and safety of park 

visitors and staff, maintain access to and 

through Fort Funston, and minimize 

impacts to the visitor experience; (3) 

permanently improve public access 

along the beach; and (4) minimize 

impacts on park assets and sustain or 

restore all park assets (e.g., facilities, 

features, grounds) to pre-construction or 

better conditions. 

Range of Alternatives: The Project 

would address storm-related flooding in 

the Vista Grande Drainage Basin, while 

providing the additional benefit of 

augmenting the level of Lake Merced. 

The project would also improve 

recreational access and reduce litter 

transfer and deposition along the beach 

below Fort Funston and maximize the 

use of existing rights-of-way, easements, 

and infrastructure to minimize 

construction-related costs, habitat 

disturbance, and disruption to 

recreational users. The Final EIS 

describes and analyzes the following 

four alternatives: 

No Project/No Action Alternative 

would result in no construction of the 

physical components of the proposed 

Project, and none of the proposed 

operational changes to stormwater 

routing or Lake Merced water 

management would be made. The NPS 

would not grant the Special Use Permit 

or amend the existing easement, and no 

construction could occur within NPSmanaged lands. Annual Canal sediment 

removal activities would continue, as 

well as as-needed maintenance 

activities. Because Canal and Tunnel 

capacity would not be improved, 

occasional flooding of the Canal and 

associated flooding of John Muir Drive 

into Lake Merced and in local 

neighborhoods would continue. This 

alternative serves as the environmental 

baseline from which potential effects of 

the ‘‘action’’ alternatives were 

compared. 

Proposed Project, identified as the 

NPS preferred alternative, would consist 

of the following: (1) Improvements 

within the Vista Grande Basin storm 

drain system upstream of the Vista 

Grande Canal; (2) Partial replacement of 

the existing Vista Grande Canal to 

incorporate a gross solid screening 

device, an approximately 2.6-acre 

constructed treatment wetland, and 

diversion and discharge structures to 

route some stormwater (and authorized 

non-stormwater) flows from the Vista 

Grande Canal to Lake Merced and to 

allow lake water to be used for summer 

treatment wetland maintenance; (3) 

Modification of the existing effluent 

gravity pipeline so that it may be used 

year round to convey treated effluent 

from the nearby North San Mateo 

County Sanitation District Wastewater 

Treatment Plant to the existing outlet 

and diffuser by gravity, and abandoning 

the force main pipeline; (4) 

Modification of the existing lake 

overflow structure to include an 

adjustable weir and siphon that allows 

water from the lake to flow into the 

Canal and Tunnel; (5) Replacement of 

the existing Vista Grande Tunnel to 

expand its hydraulic capacity and 

extend its operating lifetime and 

replacement of the Lake Merced Portal 

to the Tunnel; and (6) Replacement of 

the existing Ocean Outlet structure and 

a portion of the existing 33-inch 

submarine outfall pipeline that crosses 

the beach at Fort Funston. 

Tunnel Alignment Alternative would 

include the construction of a 

replacement tunnel south of the existing 

Tunnel. The new tunnel would run 

from a new east portal at the Canal to 

a new or rehabilitated Ocean Outlet 

structure at Fort Funston. The Tunnel 

would run beneath the Olympic Club, 

Highway 35, and the GGNRA lands. 

This alternative could be paired with 

either the proposed Canal 

improvements or the Canal 

Configuration Alternative. 

Canal Configuration Alternative 

would not construct the box culvert 

replacing the first 1,500 feet of the 

Canal; rather, the diversion structure 

described for the proposed Project 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
42704 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 174 / Monday, September 11, 2017 / Notices 

would be relocated to the southern 

(upstream) end of the Canal. The box 

culvert under John Muir Drive also 

would be relocated and would cross 

under John Muir Drive close to the 

southern end of Impound Lake. The 

design of the diversion structure, box 

culvert under John Muir Drive, and Lake 

Merced Outlet would be approximately 

the same as for the proposed Project, but 

located at the upstream (southern) end 

of the Canal. The diversion structure 

would replace the first approximately 

350 feet of the Canal, and the rest of the 

Canal would be unchanged except as 

needed for temporary construction 

access to the Lake Merced Tunnel 

Portal. Under the Canal Configuration 

Alternative, only one wetland cell of 

approximately 1.7 acres would be 

constructed. This alternative could be 

paired with either the proposed Tunnel 

improvements or the Tunnel Alignment 

Alternative. 

The EPA notice of filing and 

availability of the Draft EIS was 

published on April 29, 2016, which 

opened the 60 day public review and 

comment period. The draft document 

was posted online at http://

parkplanning.nps.gov/Vista_Grande, 

and printed copies were available on 

request. Daly City conducted one public 

meeting in Daly City on May 26, 2016. 

Following a review of agency and public 

comments on the Draft EIS, the NPS and 

Daly City prepared written responses to 

substantive comments relevant to the 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) and California Environmental 

Quality Act (CEQA) review of the 

Project. Responses to comments are 

provided in Chapter 3 of the Final EIS. 

Staff-initiated revisions to the text of the 

Draft EIS as well as revisions made in 

response to pertinent comments are 

provided in Chapter 4 of the Final EIS. 

The NPS will execute a Record of 

Decision no sooner than 30 days 

following EPA’s notice published in the 

Federal Register announcing filing and 

release of the Final EIS. The official 

responsible for approval of the Vista 

Grande Drainage Basin Improvement 

Project is the Regional Director of the 

Pacific West Region, and subsequently 

the General Superintendent, GGNRA, 

will be responsible for NPS 

implementation. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. 

Dated: July 25, 2017. 

Martha J. Lee, 

Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region. 

[FR Doc. 2017–19085 Filed 9–8–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled Certain ThermoplasticEncapsulated Electric Motors, 

Components Thereof, and Products and 

Vehicles Containing Same, DN 3248; the 

Commission is soliciting comments on 

any public interest issues raised by the 

complaint or complainant’s filing 

pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The 

public version of the complaint can be 

accessed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov, 

and will be available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at United 

States International Trade Commission 

(USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov. The 

public record for this investigation may 

be viewed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure filed on behalf of 

Intellectual Ventures II LLC on 

September 5, 2017. The complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, and the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain thermoplasticencapsulated electric motors, 

components thereof, and products and 

vehicles containing same. The 

complaint names as respondents Aisin 

Seiki Co., Ltd. of Japan; Aisin Holdings 

of America, Inc. of Seymour, IN; Aisin 

Technical Center of America, Inc. of 

Northville, MI; Aisin World Corporation 

of America of Northville, MI; Bayerische 

Motoren Werke AG of Germany; BMW 

of North America, LLC of Woodcliff 

Lake, NJ; BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC 

of Greer, SC; Denso Corporation of 

Japan; Denso International America, Inc. 

of Southfield, MI; Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 

of Japan; Honda North America, Inc. of 

Torrance, CA; American Honda Motor 

Co., Inc. of Torrance, CA; Honda of 

America Mfg., Inc. of Marysville, OH; 

Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC 

of Lincoln, AL; Honda R & D Americas, 

Inc. of Torrance, CA; Mitsuba 

Corporation of Japan; American Mitsuba 

Corporation of Mount Pleasant, MI; 

Nidec Corporation of Japan; Nidec 

Automotive Motor Americas, LLC of 

Auburn Hills, MI; Toyota Motor 

Corporation of Japan; Toyota Motor 

North America, Inc. of New York, NY; 

Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. of 

Torrance, CA; Toyota Motor Engineering 

& Manufacturing North America, Inc. of 

Erlanger, KY; Toyota Motor 

Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc. of 

Princeton, IN, and Toyota Motor 

Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. of 

Georgetown, KY. The complainant 

requests that the Commission issue a 

limited exclusion order, cease and 

desist orders, and impose a bond upon 

respondents’ alleged infringing articles 

during the 60-day Presidential review 

period pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). 

Proposed respondents, other 

interested parties, and members of the 

public are invited to file comments, not 

to exceed five (5) pages in length, 

inclusive of attachments, on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or § 210.8(b) filing. Comments should 

address whether issuance of the relief 

specifically requested by the 

complainant in this investigation would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the requested remedial 

orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES