alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41087-41088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18303]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10104]


Certification Pursuant to Section 7045(a)(4)(A) of the Department 
of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
2017

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as the Secretary of State, 
including pursuant to section 7045(a)(4)(A) of the Department of State, 
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2017 (Div. 
J, Pub. L. 115-31), I hereby certify that the central government of El 
Salvador is taking effective steps, which are in addition to those 
steps taken since the certification

[[Page 41088]]

and report submitted during the prior year, to:
    <bullet> Inform its citizens of the dangers of the journey to the 
southwest border of the United States;
    <bullet> combat human smuggling and trafficking;
    <bullet> improve border security, including to prevent illegal 
migration, human smuggling and trafficking, and trafficking of illicit 
drugs and other contraband; and
    <bullet> cooperate with United States Government agencies and other 
governments in the region to facilitate the return, repatriation, and 
reintegration of illegal migrants arriving at the southwest border of 
the United States who do not qualify for asylum, consistent with 
international law.
    This certification shall be published in the Federal Register and, 
along with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, shall be 
reported to Congress.

    Dated: August 22, 2017.
Rex W. Tillerson,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-18303 Filed 8-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
Exhibit 10.14


Form of Allocation Letter


Criteo 2015 Time-Based Free Share (RSU) Plan








[Beneficiary Name and Address]


[Date]





Letter delivered by electronic delivery





[Name of Beneficiary],





We have the pleasure to inform you that, pursuant to the authorization granted by the shareholders’ meeting held on October 23, 2015, the board of directors of Criteo (the « Company »), during its meeting held on [         ] (the « Grant Date »), granted to you free shares of the Company, under the terms and conditions provided for in Articles L. 225-197-1 to L. 225-197-5 of the French Commercial Code and in the 2015 Time-Based Free Share Plan of the Company (the « 2015 Time-Based Plan »).


The board of directors granted to you [       ] restricted stock units in respect of ordinary shares of the Company (the « Shares »), with a par value of EUR 0.025 each.


The period (named « vesting period ») at the end of which the grant will become effective and final (i.e., the Shares will be issued to you and be your property), has been set at [   ] years as from the Grant Date: [details of vesting scheduled to be inserted]. The Shares will thus be definitively acquired at the end of the vesting period unless you shall cease to be an employee of the Criteo group for any reason whatsoever during the vesting period.


In the event of Disability (as defined under Article 6.5 of the 2015 Time-Based Plan) before the end of the vesting period, the free Shares shall be definitively acquired on the date of Disability. In the event of death of during the vesting period, the free Shares shall be definitively acquired at the date of the request of allocation made by your beneficiaries in the framework of the inheritance. The request for allocation of the Shares shall be made within six (6) months from the date of death in compliance with Article L. 225-197-3 of the French Commercial Code.


By acknowledging this grant, you hereby acknowledge and agree that any Allocation (as defined in the 2015 Time-Based Plan) pursuant to the 2015 Time-Based Plan shall be subject to any applicable Criteo clawback policy, as adopted by Criteo from time to time.


The detailed terms of such grant are described in the 2015 Time-Based Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto.


Thank you for sending a copy of the 2015 Time-Based Plan to legal.corporate@criteo.com, duly initialed and signed, not later than [    ], failing which the above grant shall be null and void.





Yours sincerely,


CRITEO
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**     The undersigned officer of DATATRAK International, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify,to such officer’s knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the“Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periodspresented in the Form 10-Q.     Dated: May 10, 2007 /s/ Terry C. Black         Terry C. Black
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                                       JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                         SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                                1
<CASH>                                                                16,382,542
<SECURITIES>                                                          37,070,149
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         21,202,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           3,787,283
<INVENTORY>                                                            5,597,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      87,627,531
<PP&E>                                                                10,803,730
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         1,687,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       113,240,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 10,683,310
<BONDS>                                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                  12,509
<OTHER-SE>                                                           102,247,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         113,240,086
<SALES>                                                               10,407,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      10,407,527
<CGS>                                                                  1,990,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          1,990,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       7,784,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       1,252,233
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          456,475
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      456,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             456,475
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                .02
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
FILED AS A PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000887150        
<NAME>                          CHARLES W. CLAYTON
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<CURRENCY>                      US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-28-1998  
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1            
<CASH>                             1,091        
<SECURITIES>                       1,130        
<RECEIVABLES>                     17,846       
<ALLOWANCES>                      (2,995)      
<INVENTORY>                       28,800       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  49,846       
<PP&E>                            39,202       
<DEPRECIATION>                   (23,863)     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    80,434       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             17,303      
<BONDS>                            6,585       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0           
<PREFERRED>                            0           
<COMMON>                             419       
<OTHER-SE>                        56,127    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      80,434   
<SALES>                           26,180  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  26,256  
<CGS>                             21,757  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     21,757  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   5,822  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   185   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,508) 
<INCOME-TAX>                         350 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0     
<CHANGES>                              0      
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,158)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.28)
        


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 2, 2021

a0526 

# Order

Clerk June 2, 2021

162076

DEAN McMASTER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 162076

COA: 339271

Oakland CC: 2015

- 147414

- NO

DTE ENERGY COMPANY and FERROUS

PROCESSING AND TRADING COMPANY,

d/b/a FERROUS PROCESSING & TRADING

CO.,

Defendants,

and

DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, t he application for leave to appeal the July 2, 2020

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall

address: (1) whether the enactment of MCL 480.11a abrogated the appellee’s common

law duty of ordinary care with resp ect to loading cargo for transport by a commercial

motor vehicle operated by the appellant; and (2) whether the appellee owed a duty to the

appellant under the “shipper’s exception.” See United States v Savage Truck Line, Inc

, 209 F2d 442 , 445 (CA 4, 1953)

. The appellant’s brief and appendix shall be filed by

September 27, 2021, with no extensions except upon a showing of good cause. The time

for filing the remaining briefs shall be as set forth in MCR 7.312(E). The time allowed

for oral arg ument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).
EXHIBIT 31.1

Ludwig Kuttner, Chief Executive Officer, does hereby certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the Quarterly Report of Hampshire Group, Limited on Form
     10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2004 (the "Report");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this Report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we
     have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which the Report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,
     to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
     of directors:

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.



Date:   August 10, 2004               /s/ Ludwig Kuttner
        ---------------               -------------------------
                                      Ludwig Kuttner
                                      Chief Executive Officer
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00 074 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RODOLFO DELGADO JR. , A ppellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the 1 03rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas.



## ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF
Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam Appellant ’ s brief was originally due to be filed on Ju ne 9, 2014

. This Court has previously granted two motions for extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief in this case. On October 2 , 2014 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant ’ s c ounsel that the brief had not been filed and requested a response concerning the failure to file the brief within ten2

days. Counsel failed to respond or file a brief and this Court abated the appeal and
remanded the cause to the trial court for further pr oceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. On October 29, 2014, the trial court held a hearing and made findings that appellant intends to prosecute his appeal and that counsel has medical issues and requests additional time to finish the brief. The trial court recommended that appellant
be allowed to continue his appeal with his current attorney of record, the Honorable Rebecca Rubane, and that she be given an extension of 45 days to file the brief. The Co urt hereby REINSTATES the appeal and ORDERS the Honorable Rebecca
Rubane to file the brief on or before January 5, 2015

. No further extensions will be granted. If counsel fails to file the brief within the specified period of time, the Court will act appropriately to ensure that appellant's rights are protected. See id. R. 38.8(b)(4). Specifically, the Court will abate and remand this matter to the trial court with instructions to appoint new counsel. It is so ORDERED. PER CURIAM

Do not publish

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b)

. Delivered and filed the 1st day of December , 201 4

.
Exhibit 32
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation and its
subsidiary.
 /s/ Steven C. Futrell
    
    /s/ Kendall W. RiemanSteven C. Futrell, President and CEO
    
    Kendall W. Rieman, Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer)
    
    (Principal Financial Officer)Date: July 28, 2008
    
    Date: July 28, 2008
 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or
otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Corporation specifically incorporates this
certification by reference. 23
#### Folsom *v.*United States.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

July 26, 1884.)

’1. Internal Revenue Tax—Legacy and Succession Duties—Vested Intkkests.

The (>stato of a person who, at. the time of the passage of the act of congress of June 80, 1864, had already become entitled to and invested with an estate in fee iu certain lands, subject to his father’s life-estate, does not come within the operation of that act.

2. Same—Retroactive Operation not to be Given Law.

A retroactive operation is not to be given by construction so as to subject persons to a tax upon iniorests they may have acquired years before the act of June JO, 1864, was passed.

On Writ of Error.

*De Forest & Weeks*and *Geo. S. Sedgwick,*for plaintiff in error.

*Elihu Root,*U. S. Atty., and *W. W. Wood,*for defendant in error.

Wallace, J.

I am unable to agree with the construction placed on soction 128 of the act of June 30, 1864, in the case of *Bruñe*v. *Smith,*cited by counsel for the defendant in error. When that act was passed, the plaintiff in error had already become entitled to and invested with an estate in fee in the lands in question, subject to his father’s life-estate. The life-estate determined upon the death of the hither in 1869, and all the plaintiff in error succeeded to after the act was passed, was the increase of benefit accruing by the extinction of the life-estate. Section L28 was obviously framed, to meet just such a case. A retroactive operation is not to be given by construction, so as to subject persons to a tax upon interests they may have acquired years before the law was passed. The language of section 127 defines a succession as an interest in lands to which any person “shall become” bonefieially entitled in possession or expectancy, and by section 133 the tax is imposed upon such a succession. When a person has a vested remainder he has become bonefieially entitled. It might be maintained, if his interest was contingent and became vested by the death of another after the law was enacted, that he acquired a succession within the meaning of section 127.

The point which was considered by the court below, and which was the only question that the demurrer presented, was whether an assessment was a condition precedent to the right to collect the tax. That question was correctly decided upon the authority of *U. S.*v. *Tilden,*9 Ben. 368; *U. S.*v. *Halloran,*14 Blatchf. 1; *U. S.*v. *Erie Ry. Co.*107 U. S. 1; S. C. 2 Sup. Ct. Rep. 83; *Dollar Savings Bank*v. *U. S.*19 Wall. 227.

The complaint alleges the clear value of the succession at $353,500. It is conceded by the United States attorney that this sum represents the value of the whole estate of the defendant, and not the increase of benefit accruing by reason of the extinction of the father’s life-estate. *38The defendant should have an opportunity to answer and reduce the recovery claimed.

It is ordered that the case be remanded to the district court, with directions to affirm the judgment, .with costs, unless the defendant pays the costs of the demurrer and writ of error, withdraws the demurrer, and answers within 30 days.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CAROLYN WISE-JOHNSON-BEY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

LACEY TOLBERT, Officer, badge

number 13338; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-16714

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00578-ROS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Carolyn Wise-Johnson-Bey appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations in

connection with defendants’ entry into her residence in March 2010 to arrest her

FILED

FEB 2 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
husband. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. 

Lukovsky v. City of San Francisco, 535 F.3d 1044, 1048 (9th Cir. 2008) (dismissal

on the basis of the applicable statute of limitations); Blankenhorn v. City of

Orange, 485 F.3d 463, 470 (9th Cir. 2007) (summary judgment). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Bey’s action

is barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations. See Ariz. Rev. Stat.

§ 12-542(1) (two-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions); Lukovsky,

535 F.3d at 1048 (for § 1983 claims, federal courts apply the forum state’s

personal injury statute of limitations and federal law for determining accrual; a

§ 1983 claim accrues when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the injury

that forms the basis of the action).

Contrary to Bey’s contention, Bey is not entitled to equitable tolling based

on fraud or concealment. See Cooney v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 770 P.2d 1185,

1187 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989) (under Arizona law, “concealment sufficient to toll the

statute requires a positive act by the defendant taken for the purpose of preventing

detection of the cause of action.”). 

AFFIRMED.

2 13-16714