alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bettye FANNING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOSTON MARKET CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-11929.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 23, 2008.

Alan H. Garber, Marc N. Garber, The Garber Law Firm, P.C., Marietta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Brennan W. Bolt, Curtis L. Mack, Chandra Cain Davis, McGuireWoods LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and MOORE,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable K. Michael Moore, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Plaintiff-Appellant Bettye Fanning has not shown any reversible error in the district court’s March 26, 2007 order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation of February 26, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms the March 26, 2007 order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Boston Market Corporation as to Fanning’s federal claims and dismissing her state-law claims without prejudice.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 24 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.24

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 
 Agency relating to ``Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing 
        Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: 
Electric Utility Generating Units'' (published at 80 Fed. Reg. 64662 
(October 23, 2015)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
exv10w51






Exhibit 10.51




Schedule of Compensation Arrangements for Lisa Curtis




Title — Chief Accounting Officer




Base Salary — $200,000



Annual Incentive Plan Participation for Lisa Curtis. For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008
(the “2008 Fiscal Year”), Ms. Curtis will participate in the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan (the
“Incentive Plan”). The Incentive Plan will make Ms. Curtis eligible for bonus payments based upon
achieving target performance levels. The payout multiples and target mix and weighting of the
performance goals under the Incentive Plan for Ms. Curtis as Chief Accounting Officer for the 2008
Fiscal Year will be as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Payout Multiples
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Threshold Incentive Compensation (% of base salary)
	 	 	15	%
	Target Incentive Compensation (% of base salary)
	 	 	30	%
	Maximum Incentive Compensation (% of base salary)
	 	 	60	%
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Performance Measures
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Safety
	 	 	20	%
	Corporate EBITDA
	 	 	35	%
	Return on Capital
	 	 	25	%
	Individual
	 	 	20	%
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-2510

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Tracy J. Yost

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: November 15, 2017

Filed: November 30, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Tracy Yost appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. 1

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence modification based on Amendment 801 to the

Guidelines.

The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri.
Having reviewed the record, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s

statement in footnote 4 of its order, which indicated that even if Amendment 801

were to be given retroactive effect, the court would decline to modify Yost’s

sentence, because--consistent with the court’s explanation at the time of Yost’s

sentencing--the court viewed the sentence as appropriate after considering the 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (setting forth circumstances

under which court may reduce defendant’s prison term); see also Spirtas Co. v.

Nautilus Ins. Co., 715 F.3d 667, 670-71 (8th Cir. 2013) (this court may affirm on any

basis supported by record); cf. United States v. Hansen, 859 F.3d 576, 577-78 (8th

Cir. 2017) (on direct appeal, affirming sentence that was inconsistent with

Amendment 801; concluding that any error would have been harmless in light of

district court’s explanation of sentence imposed). We express no opinion as to the

other aspects of the district court’s order. The denial of relief is affirmed.

______________________________

-2-
f8k121911ex10i_jbi.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 





  



 


Date: December 15th 2011


 


Dear Mr. Matthew Ingham


 


It is with great pleasure to inform you that JBI is offering you full time employment as JBI’s Corporate Chief Financial Officer.


 


Base Salary:     $100,000



	
·  

	
$100,000 to be paid in cash, with a weekly payment of $1,923.08







 



	
·  

	
All JBI issued stock will be restricted for a period of 6 months (this is law)







 


Value Based Management Milestones:







$12,500 worth of JBI shares will be issued on successful completion of Qs, $25,000 if JBI shares if filed on time.


$50, 000 worth of JBI shares will be issued on successful completion of 10Ks, $50,000 worth of JBI shares if filed on time.


Beginning with Calendar year 2012, 50 percent savings of audit fees (comparing 2011 audit and review fees) will be issued in JBI shares


Successful completion of attached job description is a prerequisite and crucial part of value based management







Benefits:



	
·  

	
Full company health benefits as provided by the new JBI program.







 



	
·  

	
A company computer







 



	
·  

	
A company cell phone







 



	
·  

	
Three week vacation plus company approved holidays 







 



	
·  

	
Reimbursement for approved expenses, including:







 



	
o  

	
Travel expenses







 



	
o  

	
Office expenses







 



	
o  

	
Publications







 





 


 




  





  











  




 


 









 


 


 


You will be subject to a 180 day probationary period.


 


If you accept the offer please signed below and return to me


 


Again, I am pleased to offer you JBI’s Corporate CFO position.


 







 


Regards


 


 


John Bordynuik, CEO                                                                                     Matthew Ingham, CPA


 


JBI


 


john@jbi.net
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6724

KENNY A. CARTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General;

ELIOT SPITZER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.

(CA-04-178-GEC)

Submitted: October 29, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenny A. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kenny A. Carter appeals from the district court’s orders

dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s dismissal of Carter’s petition.

Because, however, the district court’s dismissal was without

prejudice, Carter may refile his petition in the place of his

incarceration. We deny Carter’s motion to seal his records. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 27, 2009 

Order 

 

February 27, 2009 

133725(114) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 133725 

v COA: 247039 

Wayne CC: 02-005508 

RICHARD PERRY BRYANT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension to 

January 16, 2009 of the time for filing their brief is considered and it is GRANTED.
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 21 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing 

the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the 

United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2015 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. 

GRASSLEY, and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical 

desecration of the flag of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within 7 years after the date of its submission by 

9 the Congress: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 21 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘The Congress shall have power to prohibit the phys3 ical desecration of the flag of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
GRANT MICHAEL CAMADINE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2846

_ ____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark J. Borello , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Ap pellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., BENTON and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

July 30, 2001

Before

Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 00-3640

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ROBERTO PALOMINO-RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District District

of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 00 CR 371

Suzanne B. Conlon, 

Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion of this court issued on July 20, 2001, is amended as follows: At slip opinion

page 9, line 11, delete the word “aggravated.” 

At slip opinion page 10, line 1, add the words “and at least one other felony” before the

comma. The first line on page 10 should now read:

“had been convicted of at least one aggravated felony and at least one other felony, it . . . .”
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

May 20, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00054

- CR

Marcus Anthony ROBINSON

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011CR0413 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The court reporter has filed a third notification of late reporter’s record, requesting an extension to June 7 , 2014. We GRANT the court reporter’s request and ORDER her to file the reporter ’s record on or before June 9 , 2014. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      13,836,229
<SECURITIES>                                23,921,328
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,418,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,056,465
<PP&E>                                       8,742,405
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,466,496)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,391,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,269,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       169,905
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,952,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,391,965
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,156,956
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,913,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,756,244)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,756,244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
wmtn_ex1025.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.25


 








February 18, 2011







By E-mail and US mail-certified:


Ben Porterfield


PO Box 112527


Anchorage, AK 99511







Re: Porterfield Lease, as amended – Request for extension to complete delivery of shares







Dear Ben:







      As we have discussed, Terra Mining Corporation (“Terra”) has been in the process of completing a reverse merger with West Mountain Index Advisor, Inc. We had anticipated that merger would close Friday, February, 18, 2011, but the banking holiday weekend has now delayed the expected close date until February 22, 2011, a week before our payment of US $50,000 and our tender of 500,000 shares is due under B.2.(a)(ii) on page 3 of our recent amendment to the Porterfield Lease dated January 7, 2011 (“Amendment”).







     You will receive our payment of the $50,000 on or before the due date of March 1, 2011, and we still expect to be able to advise you that we have closed our merger on or before March 1, 2011.  However, we may require an additional period of time to complete the delivery of the shares.  We are currently in the process of coordinating with the transfer agent to expedite delivery upon closing, but until closing occurs we cannot guaranty a specific delivery date.  Therefore, we ask for your agreement in extending the Amendment’s B.2(a)(ii) due date until April 1, 2011 to allow sufficient time for delivery of the shares from our transfer agent.







     Please sign your agreement to this extension of time below and return to me by e-mail at your earliest opportunity.  Don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.







Yours very truly,









 



	/s/ Gregory Schifrin	 





Gregory Schifrin, President




Terra Gold Corporation







cc: J. P. Tangen, Esq.


 

 


 I, Ben Porterfield, hereby allow Terra Gold Corporation until April 1, 2011 to complete the delivery of 500,000 shares of stock in the publicly traded affiliate of Terra Gold Corporation.





 



	/s/ Ben Porterfield	 







/s/ Ben Porterfield
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 52
          - [EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0316; FRL-9966-82-Region 9]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Final rule, correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is correcting a final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 8, 2017. That rule approved the “Nevada Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report” as a revision to the Nevada Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) and re-codified our prior approval of the Nevada Regional Haze SIP.                    

# DATES:

This action is effective on September 7, 2017.

      ( print page 42041)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Krishna Viswanathan, EPA, Region IX, Air Division, AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Krishna Viswanathan may be reached at (520) 999-7880 or                         *viswanathan.krishna@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2017-16491 appearing on page 37024 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Tuesday, August 8, 2017, the following correction is made:                

§ 52.1470 

1. On page 37024, in the third column, in amendment 2.b. to § 52.1470, the instruction “Adding, under the heading “Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada” two entries before the entry “Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program” ” is corrected to read “Adding two entries under the heading “Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada” before the second instance of the entry “Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program”.”

Dated: August 22, 2017. 

Debbie Jordan,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

[FR Doc. 2017-18769 Filed 9-5-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EX-10.07


CHINA BULL MANAGEMENT INC


665 Ellsworth Avenue


New Haven, CT 06511


Tel: 203-8440809


Fax: 866-5716313


 


Date: June 15, 2011


 


 


REGULARLY
SERVICE AGREEMENT


 


Regular service scope:


	Regularly filing of SEC forms such as 10Q, 10-K, including XBRL format, 8-K, 14-A, Form 3, 4 and 5 except
S-1.
	On behalf of client to make Nevada state annual regularly filing such as list of directors, and payment of
state resident agency.
	On behalf of client to manage and make annual payment of transfer agency.
	On behalf of client to arrange work and making payment of auditors.



 


Time period: April 24, 2011 to April 23, 2012.


 


Total fee: $15,000.00


 


Payment Schedule: $7,500 before June 30, 2011


$2,500 before September 30, 2011


$2,500 before December 31, 2011


$2,500 before March 31, 2012


 


Client responsibilities:


(1)at least five business days
ahead to submit any financial statement;


(2)the accuracy of every filing.


 


 


Client Name: USChina Taiwan Inc.


 


 


/s/: Ching-Sang Hong
S. Con. Res. 28 Agreed to February 3, 2016

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF JOINT COMMITTEE. 

There is established a Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘joint committee’’) consisting of 3 Senators and 3 Members of the House 

of Representatives, to be appointed by the President of the Senate 

and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, respectively. 

The joint committee is authorized to make the necessary arrangements for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice President-elect of the United States on January 20, 2017. 

SEC. 2. SUPPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE. 

The joint committee— 

(1) is authorized to utilize appropriate equipment and the 

services of appropriate personnel of departments and agencies 

of the Federal Government, under arrangements between the 

joint committee and the heads of those departments and agencies, in connection with the inaugural proceedings and ceremonies; and 
S. Con. Res. 28—2 

(2) may accept gifts and donations of goods and services 

to carry out its responsibilities. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.