alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8

List of Subsidiaries



|                                                   |  |                         
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                                 |  | Country of
Incorporation
|Aerolíneas Galápagos Aerogal, S.A.                 |  | Ecuador                 
|Aerovias del Continente Americano, S.A.            |  | Colombia                
|Líneas Aéreas Costaricenses S.A.                   |  | Costa Rica              
|Nicaragüense de Aviación, S.A.                     |  | Nicaragua               
|Taca International Airlines, S.A.                  |  | El Salvador             
|Tampa Cargo S.A.S.                                 |  | Colombia                
|Trans American Airlines, S.A.                      |  | Peru                    
|Aerotaxis La Costeña, S.A.                         |  | Nicaragua               
|Isleña de Inversiones, S.A. de C.V.                |  | Honduras                
|Servicios Aéreos Nacionales S.A.                   |  | Costa Rica              
|Aerospace Investments, Limited                     |  | Bahamas                 
|Aviation Leasing Services (ALS), Inc.              |  | Panama                  
|Aviation Leasing Services, Investments (ALS), S.A. |  | Panama                  
|Intercontinental Equipment Corp.                   |  | Bahamas                 
|Little Plane, Limited                              |  | Bahamas                 
|Little Plane Six, Limited                          |  | Bahamas                 
|Southern Equipment Corp.                           |  | Bahamas                 
|Turboprop Leasing Company, Limited                 |  | Bahamas                 
|Technical & Training Services, S.A. de C.V.        |  | El Salvador             
|Grupo Taca Holdings, Limited                       |  | Bahamas                 
|Ronair N.V.                                        |  | Curaçao                 
|Avianca Inc.                                       |  | USA                     
|LifeMiles B.V.                                     |  | Curaçao                 
|Tampa Cargo Logistics, Inc.                        |  | USA                     
|Getcom International Investments, SL               |  | Spain                   
|Avianca Leasing, LLC                               |  | USA                     
|Turbo Aviation Two, Limited                        |  | Ireland                 
|Latin Airways Corp.                                |  | Panamá                  
|Vu-Marsat S.A.                                     |  | Costa Rica              
|Turbo Aviation Three S.A.                          |  | Panamá
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 23 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.23

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 
    Agency relating to ``Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas 
  Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: 
                  Electric Utility Generating Units''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, 
Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility 
Generating Units'' (published at 80 Fed. Reg. 64510 (October 23, 
2015)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### In re: Foster J. GIBBONS, Foster J. Gibbons Appellant, v. Louise M. Smith, Appellee.

No. 04-4617-BK.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 21, 2005.

Foster J. Gibbons, (pro hac vice) New York, N.Y., for Debtor-Appellant.

Dayton P. Haigney, Cheng *&*Haigney, LLP, New York, N.Y., for Appellee.

PRESENT: CALABRESI, B.D. PARKER, and WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Debtor Foster J. Gibbons appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Rakoff, *J.),*affirming an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Gropper, *B.J.).*The bankruptcy court ruled that Gibbons’s debt to Louise M. Smith was nondischargeable because it was predicated on securities fraud. *See*11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19); *In re Gibbons,*289 B.R. 588 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2004). This debt arose from an arbitral award which concluded *inter alia*that Gibbons committed fraud in the purchase and sale of securities in an account owned by Smith and managed by Gibbons’s company. The award and circumstances surrounding the underlying *535transactions are described in the bankruptcy court’s opinion. *See Gibbons,*289 B.R. at 590-592. We assume familiarity with the relevant facts, procedural history, and the issues on appeal.

In reviewing the district court’s disposition of a bankruptcy appeal, this Court reviews legal conclusions *de novo*and factual findings for clear error. *See In re Best Prods. Co.,*68 F.3d 26, 29 (2d Cir.1995). We have considered all of Gibbons’s claims on appeal and find them either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. For substantially the reasons stated by the district court in its careful analysis, the judgment below is affirmed. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18263]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  September 6, 2017, 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

PLACE:  Via tele-conference hosted at Inter-American Foundation, 1331 
Pennsylvania Ave. Suite 1200, NW., Washington, DC 20004.

STATUS:  Meeting of the Board of Directors, Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Next steps for updating advisory council 
membership.
     The role of the Board in funding decisions.

FOR DIAL-IN INFORMATION CONTACT:  Karen Vargas, Executive Assistant, 
(202) 524-8869.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Paul Zimmerman, General Counsel, 
(202) 683-7118.

Paul Zimmerman,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017-18263 Filed 8-24-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 1997, March 31, 1997,
and December 31, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference 
to such financial statements. The Financial Data Schedules have been
restated to reflect the Company's adoption of FAS 128, Earnings
Per Share.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                          <C>            <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS          6-MOS          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              SEP-30-1997    SEP-30-1997    SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1997    MAR-31-1997    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                               5,442          5,201          4,036
<SECURITIES>                        11,743          8,708         10,724
<RECEIVABLES>                        8,697         11,732         10,867
<ALLOWANCES>                            81             81            269
<INVENTORY>                            156            133            138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    27,405         27,062         26,649
<PP&E>                              11,905         11,318         10,860
<DEPRECIATION>                       5,364          5,068          4,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      37,653         36,794         35,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                7,136          7,800          7,395
<BONDS>                                  0              0              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0              0              0
<PREFERRED>                              0              0              0
<COMMON>                                55             55             58
<OTHER-SE>                          29,819         28,585         27,988
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        37,653         36,794         35,965
<SALES>                             25,687         16,985          7,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    25,687         16,985          7,128
<CGS>                                8,959          6,000          2,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       22,003         14,783          6,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0              0              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0              0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    (601)          (406)          (202)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      4,285          2,608            900
<INCOME-TAX>                         1,491            845            359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  2,794          1,763            541
<DISCONTINUED>                           0              0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0              0              0
<CHANGES>                                0              0              0
<NET-INCOME>                         2,794          1,763            541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .51            .32            .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .50            .32            .10
        

</TABLE>
### Bureau of Labor Statistics U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Most New Jobs **Most new jobs:** 20 occupations with the highest projected numeric change in employment. *Click on an occupation name to see the full occupational profile.* OCCUPATION
                NUMBER OF NEW JOBS (PROJECTED), 2022-32
                2023 MEDIAN PAYHome health and personal care aides
		804,600 New Jobs (Projected)804,600			
			
					
		$33,530         per yearSoftware developers
		410,400 New Jobs (Projected)410,400			
			
					
		$132,270         per yearCooks, restaurant
		277,600 New Jobs (Projected)277,600			
			
					
		$35,780         per yearStockers and order fillers
		178,600 New Jobs (Projected)178,600			
			
					
		$36,390         per yearRegistered nurses
		177,400 New Jobs (Projected)177,400			
			
					
		$86,070         per yearLaborers and freight, stock, and material movers, hand
		158,800 New Jobs (Projected)158,800			
			
					
		$37,660         per yearGeneral and operations managers
		147,300 New Jobs (Projected)147,300			
			
					
		$101,280         per yearMedical and health services managers
		144,700 New Jobs (Projected)144,700			
			
					
		$110,680         per yearLight truck drivers
		133,800 New Jobs (Projected)133,800			
			
					
		$42,470         per yearFinancial managers
		126,600 New Jobs (Projected)126,600			
			
					
		$156,100         per yearNurse practitioners
		118,600 New Jobs (Projected)118,600			
			
					
		$126,260         per yearMarket research analysts and marketing specialists
		116,600 New Jobs (Projected)116,600			
			
					
		$74,680         per yearMedical assistants
		105,900 New Jobs (Projected)105,900			
			
					
		$42,000         per yearManagement analysts
		95,700 New Jobs (Projected)95,700			
			
					
		$99,410         per yearHeavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers
		89,300 New Jobs (Projected)89,300			
			
					
		$54,320         per yearComputer and information systems managers
		86,000 New Jobs (Projected)86,000			
			
					
		$169,510         per yearSubstance abuse, behavioral disorder, and mental health counselors
		71,500 New Jobs (Projected)71,500			
			
					
		$53,710         per yearAccountants and auditors
		67,400 New Jobs (Projected)67,400			
			
					
		$79,880         per yearLawyers
		62,400 New Jobs (Projected)62,400			
			
					
		$145,760         per yearConstruction laborers
		61,900 New Jobs (Projected)61,900			
			
					
		$45,300         per year **Last Modified Date:**
                        Wednesday, April 17, 2024


**U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics**
Office of Occupational Statistics and Employment Projections 
PSB Suite 2135 
2 Massachusetts Avenue NE  
Washington, DC 20212-0001 Telephone:1-202-691-5700 

www.bls.gov/ooh
Contact OOH
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


             COLLABORATIVE CLINICAL RESEARCH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                         OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                            

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months                        Nine Months 
                                                         Ended September 30,                Ended September 30,
                                                     ----------------------------       ----------------------------
                                                         1997            1996                1997            1996
                                                     ------------    ------------       ------------    ------------

<S>                                                    <C>             <C>                <C>             <C>       
Net income (loss)                                      $  (1,462)      $      709         $  (2,367)      $    1,053
                                                     ============    ============       ============    ============

Weighted average common shares outstanding                 6,402            6,271             6,377            4,071
Net effect of dilutive common share options
     and dilutive common share warrants - Note A                              379                                448
                                                           -----                              -----
Shares used in calculation of net income
     (loss) per common share                               6,402            6,650             6,377            4,519
                                                     ============    ============       ============    ============

Net income (loss) per common share - Note B            $   (0.23)      $     0.11         $   (0.37)      $     0.23
                                                     ============    ============       ============    ============
</TABLE>


NOTE A -       Common share options and warrants granted within a twelve
               month period preceding the Company's initial public offering are
               included as if they were outstanding for all periods presented
               prior to the Company's initial public offering. The dilutive
               effect of all options outstanding was calculated using the
               treasury stock method.

NOTE B -       Fully diluted net income (loss) per common share has not been
               presented because the effect is either immaterial or
               anti-dilutive.
Fidelity National Title 

Insurance Company, 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 20, 2015

No. 04-14-00913-CV

David MEDRANO,

Appellant

v.

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Successor by Merger Lawyers 

Title Insurance Corporation, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. d.b.a HOMEQ, as servicing Agent 

for Duetsche Bnk. National Trust Company as Trustee,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI-00027

The Honorable Richard E. Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment and an affidavit of 

indigence. A contest to the affidavit was filed and, on January 26, 2015, the trial court sustained 

the contest. Medrano did not file a motion challenging the trial court’s order. See TEX. R. APP. P.

20.1(j)(1), (2) (party may challenge order sustaining contest by filing motion in court of appeals 

no later than ten days after order sustaining contest is signed).

Both the court reporter and the district clerk have filed notifications of late record, stating 

the records have not been filed because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the 

clerk’s and reporter’s fees to prepare the record and appellant is not entitled to the record without 

paying the fees.

We order appellant David Medrano to file, by March 2, 2015, written proof that the 

clerk’s and reporter’s fees have been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the clerk and reporter 

have been made to pay the fees. If Medrano fails to timely comply with this order, the appeal 

will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10685 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. RA UL A NT ONI O MI RA NDA
- AR RO Y O D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 1 : 0 8 - CR- 3 - ALL B e fo r e H IG G IN B O T H A M , D E N N IS , a n d P R A D O , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F e d e r a l P u b lic D e fe n d e ra p p o in te d to r e p r e s e n t R a u l A n to n io M ir a n d a -A r r o y o h a s m o v e d fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w a n d h a s file d a b r ie f in ac c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . C a lif o rn ia , 386 U . S. 738 ( 1967) . M i r anda- A r r oyo has n ot f i l ed a response. O u r i n dep en den t revi ew of t h e recor d and coun sel ’ s b ri ef di scl oses n o non f

rivo lou s i ssue f

or app eal . A ccor di n gl y, coun sel ’ s m ot i on f or l eave t o w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun seli s excused f rom f u rt h er r espon sibi l i t i es h e r e in , a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and


18 U.S.C. Section 1350








In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Dialysis Corporation of America (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), the undersigned, Stephen W. Everett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Andrew Jeanneret, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of our knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.





/s/ Stephen W. EverettSTEPHEN W. EVERETT, President and ChiefExecutive Officer/s/ Andrew JeanneretANDREW JEANNERET, Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer





Dated: April 30, 2010





It is not intended that this certification be deemed to be filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section; and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6393

MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SCOTT, in his individual and official capacity , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. M. Hannah Lauck , District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv
- 00583

- MHL

- RCY )

Submitted : September 12, 2019 Decided: September 19, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER , Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Momolu V.S. Sir leaf seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action without prejudice and denying reconsideration. We may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U .S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order s that Sirleaf seeks to appeal are neither final order s nor appealable interlocutory or collateral order s
. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Leg al Aid Soc’y , 807 F.3d 619, 629

- 30 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to give Sirleaf another opportunity to either pay the initial filing fee or state u nder penalty of perjury that he does not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED AND REMANDED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RAUL LUNA-BARBOSA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10442

D.C. No. 4:08-cr-01179-JMR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

John M. Roll, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2011** 

Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. 

Raul Luna-Barbosa appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month

sentence imposed for being an illegal alien found in the United States following

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), Luna-Barbosa’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no

FILED

NOV 03 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10442

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No

pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED.