alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELMER STEVE FUENTES HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 71200

Agency No. A206

- 421

- 638

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an

Immigration Judge’s Decision

Submitted September 26, 2017 **

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N. R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Elmer Steve Fuentes Hernandez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions

for review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order affirming the decision of an

asylum officer during expedited removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for

review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 2 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 71200

We lack jurisdic tion to review the IJ’s order because it was issued pursuant

to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) and none of the exceptions to the restriction on judicial

review of expedited removal orders apply. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A)(iii) (“no

court shall have jurisdiction to review” determinat ions made under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1225(b)(1)(B)) ; Pena v. L ynch , 815 F.3d 452, 455

- 56 (9th Cir. 2016) (concluding

this court generally lacks jurisdiction to review removal orders issued pursuant to 8

U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) and describing the limited exceptions).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
     John W. Hlywak, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
     pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        1.  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.  The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                                /s/John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                   -----------------------------------
                                   John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   August 6, 2008
IC 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 984 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2015 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 

Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

AN ACT 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

Medicare beneficiary access to eye tracking accessories 

for speech generating devices and to remove the rental 

cap for durable medical equipment under the Medicare 

Program with respect to speech generating devices. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 984 RFH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Steve Gleason Act of 

5 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROVIDING MEDICARE BENEFICIARY ACCESS TO 

7 EYE TRACKING ACCESSORIES FOR SPEECH 

8 GENERATING DEVICES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(n) of the Social Se10 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended by inserting 

11 ‘‘and eye tracking and gaze interaction accessories for 

12 speech generating devices furnished to individuals with a 

13 demonstrated medical need for such accessories’’ after 

14 ‘‘appropriate organizations)’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to devices furnished 

17 on or after January 1, 2016. 

18 SEC. 3. REMOVING THE RENTAL CAP FOR DURABLE MED19 ICAL EQUIPMENT UNDER MEDICARE WITH 

20 RESPECT TO SPEECH GENERATING DEVICES. 

21 Section 1834(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

22 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(2)(A)) is amended— 

23 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

24 (2) in clause (iii), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

25 and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

S 984 RFH

1 (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following 

2 new clause: 

3 ‘‘(iv) in the case of devices furnished 

4 on or after October 1, 2015, and before 

5 October 1, 2018, which serves as a speech 

6 generating device or which is an accessory 

7 that is needed for the individual to effec8 tively utilize such a device,’’. 

Passed the Senate April 22, 2015. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 10.29**

 

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
|        |
|   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
|        |
|   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
|        |
|   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
|        |
|   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
|        |
|   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
|        |
|   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
|        |
|   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
|        |
|   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
|        |
|   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
|        |
|   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
|        |
|   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|   |
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF THE chief FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. sECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio
Estrada Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,



|1) | the
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the
                                         information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                                         and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By | /s/
    Antonio Estrada Jr. | 
|-- | --------------------------- | 
|   | Antonio
    Estrada Jr.     | 
|   | Chief
    Financial Officer | 
|   | May
    22, 2015            |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         381,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  869,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                   163,560
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,160,668
<PP&E>                                       1,029,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                 357,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,576,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,121,410
<BONDS>                                      7,662,176
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,988
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,786,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,576,830
<SALES>                                      2,554,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,554,668
<CGS>                                        1,238,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,361,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                62,870
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             440,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (485,258)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (485,258)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (485,258)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Erin M. Rohde, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from May 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

Dated March 17, 2014

 
|   | /s/ Erin M. Rohde                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Erin M. Rohde                           |
|   | Assistant Treasurer of                  |
|   | Ford Motor Credit Company   LLC,        |
|   | as Servicer of Ford Credit   Auto Owner |
|   | Trust 2013-B                            |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 14 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 14

 Providing that the President may not provide sanctions relief to Iran 
      until certain United States citizens are released from Iran.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2015

  Mr. Risch submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing that the President may not provide sanctions relief to Iran 
      until certain United States citizens are released from Iran.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the President may not 
waive, suspend, reduce, provide relief from, or otherwise limit the 
application of statutory sanctions with respect to Iran under any 
provision of law or refrain from applying any such sanctions pursuant 
to an agreement with Iran relating to Iran's nuclear program until the 
Government of Iran releases to the United States the following United 
States citizens:
            (1) Saeed Abedini of Idaho, who has been detained in Iran 
        on charges related to his religious beliefs since September 
        2012.
            (2) Amir Hekmati of Michigan, who has been imprisoned in 
        Iran on false espionage charges since August 2011.
            (3) Jason Rezaian of California, who, as an Iranian 
        government credentialed reporter for the Washington Post, has 
        been unjustly held in Iran on vague charges since July 2014.
            (4) Robert Levinson of Florida, who was abducted on Kish 
        Island in March 2007.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 126 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 126

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 
    on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 27 (legislative day, March 26), 2015

    Mr. Blunt (for himself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 
    on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected members of the following joint committees of Congress:
    Joint Committee on Printing: Mr. Blunt, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Boozman, 
Mr. Schumer, and Mr. Udall.
    Joint Committee of Congress on the Library: Mr. Blunt, Mr. Roberts, 
Mrs. Capito, Mr. Schumer, and Mr. Leahy.
                                 <all>
```
#### Thomas G. WAYLAND, petitioner, v. Charles F. McVAY, United States Trustee.

No. 10-147.

Oct. 4, 2010.

Case below, 354 Fed.Appx. 837.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE

#### Debra Bates, Administrator v. Commonwealth of Virginia

December 3, 2002

Case No. (Law) 02-54

By Judge Edward L. Hogshire

This letter opinion addresses the Commonwealth’s Motion to Dismiss the instant claim for inadequate notice, pursuant to Va. Code § 8.01-195.6 (2002). The case concerns the death of plaintiffs infant daughter while she was a patient at the University of Virginia Medical Center. On August 14, 2001, Plaintiff filed notice of the claim under the Virginia Tort Claims Act (VTCA), citing the location of the incident as “University of Virginia Health Sciences Center.” The Commonwealth contends that the lack of specificity in the notice of claim constitutes invalid notice, as established by the Supreme Co.urt of Virginia in *Halberstam v. Commonwealth,*251 Va. 248 (1996), and therefore that the claim must be dismissed. The Court determines that *Halberstam*is controlling, and thus grants the Commonwealth’s motion to dismiss.

Under the VTCA, every claim against the Commonwealth is barred unless a plaintiff files a written statement of the nature of the claim, “which includes the time and place at which the injury is alleged to have occurred.” Va. Code § 8.01-195.6 (2002). It is well established that litigants must strictly comply with the terms of statutes that remove the Commonwealth’s veil of immunity from suit. See *Town of Crewe v. Marler,*228 Va. 109 (1984); *Fugate v. Martin,*208 Va. 529 (1968). The Supreme Court of Virginia dealt with this precise issue in *Halberstam*v. *Commonwealth,*251 Va. 248 (1996), when it dismissed a claim for an injury that occurred in a parking lot at George Mason University, a state supported institution. Because the plaintiffs notice of the *406claim did not specify in which parking lot the injury occurred, and since statutes in derogation of the common law must be strictly construed, the court found that Halberstam’s notice did not meet the statutory requirement. The Richmond Circuit Court applied similar reasoning in *Jennings v. Commonwealth,*14 Va. Cir. 331 (1989), when it dismissed a claim against the Medical College of Virginia which provided a hospital room number but did not specify in which building the incident occurred.

Plaintiff argues several alternative rules of statutory construction that could be applied to permit the claim. However, each of these interpretations conflicts with the Virginia Supreme Court’s interpretation of the statute in *Halberstam.*Despite the harsh consequences for the plaintiff here, this Court must apply the law as articulated by statute and interpreted by the Supreme Court of Virginia. Accordingly, the Commonwealth’s motion to dismiss is granted.
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

 

**2016 Annual Statement ofServicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of June1, 2013 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank NationalAssociation as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust2013-C14, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C14  **(WFRBS2013-C14)**

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.  All servicingactivities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling andServicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.  A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2016 toDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.  To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects forthe Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

 

Certified by: /s/AdamSinger                                                                  

Adam Singer, ManagingDirector

Date: March 1, 2017
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 14 

Providing that the President may not provide sanctions relief to Iran until 

certain United States citizens are released from Iran. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mr. RISCH submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing that the President may not provide sanctions relief 

to Iran until certain United States citizens are released 

from Iran. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That, notwithstanding any other provision of 

3 law, the President may not waive, suspend, reduce, provide 

4 relief from, or otherwise limit the application of statutory 

5 sanctions with respect to Iran under any provision of law 

6 or refrain from applying any such sanctions pursuant to 

7 an agreement with Iran relating to Iran’s nuclear program 

8 until the Government of Iran releases to the United States 

9 the following United States citizens: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 14 IS 

1 (1) Saeed Abedini of Idaho, who has been de2 tained in Iran on charges related to his religious be3 liefs since September 2012. 

4 (2) Amir Hekmati of Michigan, who has been 

5 imprisoned in Iran on false espionage charges since 

6 August 2011. 

7 (3) Jason Rezaian of California, who, as an Ira8 nian government credentialed reporter for the Wash9 ington Post, has been unjustly held in Iran on vague 

10 charges since July 2014. 

11 (4) Robert Levinson of Florida, who was ab12 ducted on Kish Island in March 2007. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered May 5, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01577-CV

WAYNE A. RAND, Appellant

V.

DOROTHY DENNISE RAND, Appellee

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-1306590

ORDER

On April 20, 2015, pursuant to the Court’s April 1, 2015 order, the Court received 

appellant’s request for preparation of the reporter’s record, designating the portions of the 

proceedings to be included in the record. Within that request, appellant also designated the 

following items be included in the clerk’s record: 

•February 20, 2015 “motion for bench warrant;”

•February 20, 2015 “letter to Brad Nace;”

•February 26, 2015 “motion to deny petitioner’s motion to deny motion for new trial;”

•March 3, 2015 “notice Wayne Rand appeared ready for hearing but 255th and petitioner 

were no show;”

•March 12, 2015 “motion of addendum;” and,

•March 19, 2015 “motion for reconsideration.”
The clerk’s record was filed before this request was received and does not include those 

items. Accordingly, we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing those items. If any of the requested items cannot be 

located, Ms. Pitre shall file written verification so stating. The record, and any verification, shall 

be filed no later than May 14, 2015. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.1


                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned certifies that
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Diacrin, Inc.


Date: August 13, 2002                          /s/  Thomas H. Fraser
                                              -----------------------
                                                    Thomas H. Fraser
                                                    President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer



                                               /s/  Kevin Kerrigan
                                              -----------------------
                                                    Kevin Kerrigan
                                                    Controller
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 2, 2021

a0526

Order 

Clerk

June 2, 2021

162076

DEAN McMASTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 162076

COA: 339271

Oakland CC: 2015-147414-NO

DTE ENERGY COMPANY and FERROUS

PROCESSING AND TRADING COMPANY,

d/b/a FERROUS PROCESSING & TRADING

CO.,

Defendants,

and

DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 2, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

address: (1) whether the enactment of MCL 480.11a abrogated the appellee’s common 

law duty of ordinary care with respect to loading cargo for transport by a commercial 

motor vehicle operated by the appellant; and (2) whether the appellee owed a duty to the 

appellant under the “shipper’s exception.” See United States v Savage Truck Line, Inc, 

209 F2d 442, 445 (CA 4, 1953). The appellant’s brief and appendix shall be filed by 

September 27, 2021, with no extensions except upon a showing of good cause. The time 

for filing the remaining briefs shall be as set forth in MCR 7.312(E). The time allowed 

for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).