alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Abstract (150-word limit): 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Et cumque quod qui cupiditate ratione ut perferendis corrupti cum vitae aspernatur 

qui sint perferendis sit tenetur adipisci. Vel unde corrupti et expedita earum id sapiente sint eos reprehenderit 

nostrum et sunt rerum eos laboriosam saepe. Et ipsa repudiandae ex obcaecati explicabo ut omnis consectetur 

rem praesentium reiciendis. Et officiis quae aut laudantium voluptas ut iure excepturi id accusamus maxime est 

voluptatibus voluptatem. Aut cupiditate pariatur et fugit accusantium id ratione magnam. Et beatae eius ut molestiae quibusdam ea sunt iste nam possimus repellat ex internos autem vel consequuntur ipsa At voluptas odio. 

Ea animi autem sit autem dignissimos et impedit esse rem natus quibusdam qui omnis autem est doloremque 

fugit. Qui eveniet nulla ut earum ratione ut voluptas asperiores ut cupiditate fugiat in provident iusto nam officiis 

blanditiis et nobis tempora. Aut consequatur pariatur aut suscipit sequi aut eligendi perferendis qui quia veniam 

aut cupiditate error!

I affirm that this article is original work, written by the names individual(s), and that all contributors and

references are properly credited. I have the rights to the is work and it has not been published elsewhere. 

Student Signature: Date:

I have reviewed this student’s work and find it to be appropriate for submission to the Student MLR.

Adivsor Signature: Date:

Undergraduate

Student Monthly Labor Review (MLR) Submission Form

Submit form and associated files to: Studentmlr@bls.gov

Student

Student Email: 

Advisor Email:

Advisor/Professor

Major: 

Year in School:

Masters
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132000 & (19) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132000 

 COA: 267435 

Genesee CC: 00-007029-FC 

LAQUAN TREMAINE JOHNSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED. 

s1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 4.10  DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  As of April 30, 2019, Black Cactus Global, Inc.. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) has one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”): our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock).  Common Stock  The authorized Common Stock is four hundred ninety million (490,000,000) shares with a par value of $0.0001. Shares of our Common Stock:  ●have equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available if and when declared by our Board of Directors;●are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets available for distribution to holders of Common Stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs;●do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights; and●are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters on which stockholders may vote.  We refer you to our Bylaws, our Articles of Incorporation, and the applicable statutes of the State of Florida for a more complete description of the rights and liabilities of holders of our securities.  Non-Cumulative Voting  Holders of shares of our Common Stock do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares, voting for the election of directors, can elect all of the directors to be elected, if they so choose, and, in that event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any of our directors. After this offering is completed, present stockholders will own approximately 75% of our outstanding shares.  Cash Dividends  As of the date of this Prospectus, we have not declared or paid any cash dividends to stockholders. The declaration of any future cash dividend will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our earnings, if any, our capital requirements and financial position, our general economic conditions, and other pertinent conditions. It is our present intention not to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, but rather to reinvest earnings, if any, in our business operations.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 11




                              EQUITRAC CORPORATION

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                   (in thousands, except earnings per share)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED    SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                          AUGUST 31,           AUGUST 31,
                                     --------------------  ------------------
                                       1996       1995      1996      1995
                                       ----       ----      ----      ----
<S>                                   <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>
Weighted average number of common  
   shares outstanding                  3,401      3,565     3,396     3,591
                                      
Common share equivalents arising      
   from dilutive options                 155         66       139        65
                                      ------     ------    ------    ------
                                                                     
                                       3,556      3,631     3,535     3,656
                                      ======     ======    ======    ======
                                                                     
Earnings per share                    $ 0.18     $ 0.11    $ 0.35    $ 0.23
                                      ======     ======    ======    ======
</TABLE>
IIA 

Calendar No. 286 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 22 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Corps of Engineers and 

the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the definition of ‘‘waters 

of the United States’’ under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 

Mrs. ERNST (for herself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Mr. BURR, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. COATS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. COTTON, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. DAINES, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. 

FISCHER, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. 

HATCH, Mr. HELLER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. LEE, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MORAN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. 

PAUL, Mr. PERDUE, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. 

RUBIO, Mr. SASSE, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. THUNE, 

Mr. TILLIS, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. VITTER, Mr. WICKER, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. 

CASSIDY, Mr. CORKER, Mr. KIRK, and Mr. MCCONNELL) introduced the 

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

OCTOBER 30, 2015 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and placed 

on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the definition of ‘‘waters of the 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 22 PCS 

United States’’ under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

4 Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection 

5 Agency relating to ‘‘Clean Water Rule: Definition of 

6 ‘Waters of the United States’ ’’ (80 Fed. Reg. 37054; 

7 June 29, 2015), and such rule shall have no force or ef8 fect. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 286 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 22 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapthe Federal Water Pollution Control Act. definition of ‘‘waters of the United States’’ under vironmental Protection Agency relating to the submitted by the Corps of Engineers and the En- ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

OCTOBER 30, 2015 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

802(c), and placed on the calendar 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### WILLIAM F. JOBBINS, Inc. v. AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, Inc., et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Jan. 5, 1954.

*179Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, for libelant.

Haight, Deming, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, for respondent American Export Lines, Inc.

Macklin, Speer, Hanan & McKernan, New York City, for respondent Evans Transp. Corp.

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

Libelant, William F. Jobbins, Inc., an Illinois corporation, moves for an order vacating or modifying respondent’s notice to examine it upon oral deposition by “John Doe”, its president and “Richard Roe”, its vice-president, in New York City. As alternatives to vacating respondent’s notice, libelant asks that the deposition be taken by written interrogatories, or upon oral examination in Illinois, the expense of movant’s counsel being taxable as costs against respondent or upon oral examination in New York, the expense of the officers’ attendance being taxable as costs. The suit is to recover for alleged damage to and short delivery of a shipment of aluminum ingots carried from Venice to New York. The notice also calls for defendant’s production at the examination of records and documents concerning the shipment, including insurance papers.

The respondent should have the benefit of the more complete technique of oral deposition and the branch of the motion that the examination be conducted by written interrogatories is denied.1

The libelant having selected this forum and no unusual circumstances appearing, it should submit to oral examination here at its own expense, or in the alternative pay the respondent’s counsel’s reasonable expenses in going to Illinois, if it chooses the latter course.2 Thus, the branch of the motion seeking to tax as costs the expense of bringing libelant’s officers to New York for oral examination is denied. But, should libelant elect to hold the examination in Illinois, the branch of the motion seeking to tax as costs the expense and reasonable counsel fee of libelant’s counsel in going to Illinois is denied and should libelant elect that the examination be held in Illinois, libelant shall prepay respondent’s counsel’s reasonable expenses in attending the taking of the deposition in Illinois.

There is insufficient in the papers upon which to determine now whether the testimony, when sought, will appear “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” 3

Hence, the branch of the motion to limit the examination is denied, but without prejudice to an application by libelant during the examination for relief from annoyance, embarrassment or oppression.4

Settle order.

1

. Worth v. Trans World Films, Inc., D.C., S.D.N.Y., 11 F.R.D. 197.

2

. See Taejon Bristle Mfg. Co., Ltd. v. Omnex Corp., D.C., S.D.N.Y., 13 F.R.D. 448.

3

. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 26(b), 28 U.S.C.A.

4

. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 30(d).
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 16 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2015 

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF POLICY ON RELEASE OF 

4 UNITED STATES CITIZENS IN IRAN. 

5 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find6 ings: 

7 (1) Saeed Abedini of Idaho is a Christian pas8 tor unjustly detained in Iran since 2012 and sen9 tenced to eight years in prison on charges related to 

10 his religious beliefs. 

11 (2) Amir Hekmati of Michigan is a former 

12 United States Marine unjustly detained in 2011 

13 while visiting his Iranian relatives and sentenced to 

14 10 years in prison for espionage. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SCON 16 RFH 

1 (3) Jason Rezaian of California is a Wash2 ington Post journalist credentialed by the Govern3 ment of Iran. He was unjustly detained in 2014 and 

4 has been held without a trial. 

5 (4) Robert Levinson of Florida is a former Fed6 eral Bureau of Investigations (FBI) official who dis7 appeared in 2007 in Iran. He is the longest held 

8 United States citizen in United States history. 

9 (b) STATEMENT OF POLICY.—It is the policy of the 

10 United States that— 

11 (1) the Government of the Islamic Republic of 

12 Iran should immediately release Saeed Abedini, 

13 Amir Hekmati, and Jason Rezaian, and cooperate 

14 with the United States Government to locate and re15 turn Robert Levinson; and 

16 (2) the United States Government should un17 dertake every effort using every diplomatic tool at its 

18 disposal to secure their immediate release. 

Passed the Senate May 11, 2015. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS 

Secretary. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Economic Analysis

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), U.S. Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of the renewal of the BEA Advisory Committee Charter.

# SUMMARY:

Please note that the U.S. Department of Commerce renewed the Charter for the Bureau of Economic Analysis Advisory Committee on June 9, 2017. It has been determined that the Committee is necessary and in the public interest.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dondi Staunton, Designated Federal Official, Communications Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20233; Telephone (301) 278-9798; Email                         *dondi.staunton@bea.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Committee was established September 2, 1999, to advise the Director of BEA on matters related to the development and improvement of BEA's national, industry, international, and regional economic accounts.

Dated: August 10, 2017.

Brian Moyer,

Director, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

[FR Doc. 2017-18518 Filed 8-30-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-06-P
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Southside Partners, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. CV1408293.

Vs. No. 11-16-00346-CV * December 21, 2018

Collazo Enterprises, LLC, * Memorandum Opinion by Simmons, F.J.

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.; 

Simmons, F.J., sitting by assignment;

and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

 

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The 

costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Southside Partners.
Advance copies of this statement are made available to the
press under lock-up conditions with the explicit
understanding that the data are embargoed until 8:30 a.m.
Eastern Daylight Time.


                        Statement of
                              
                     Kathleen P. Utgoff
                        Commissioner
                 Bureau of Labor Statistics
                              
                    Friday, June 2, 2006


     Nonfarm payroll employment edged up by 75,000 in May,
and the unemployment rate, at 4.6 percent, was essentially
unchanged.  From January through April of this year, payroll
employment growth averaged 164,000 per month.

     Within the service-providing sector, health care
employment continued to expand, rising by 19,000 in May.
Within professional and business services, employment
increased in computer systems design.  Wholesale trade added
14,000 jobs in May; employment in this industry has grown by
108,000 in the past year.  Over the month, employment
continued to trend up in financial activities.

     Retail trade employment fell by 27,000 in May,
following an even larger decline in April.  Over the year,
however, retail trade employment has changed little, on net.
The information industry shed 13,000 jobs in May; losses
were concentrated in motion picture and sound recording
industries.  Employment in leisure and hospitality was
little changed over the month.

     In the goods-producing sector, manufacturing employment
edged down by 14,000, largely offsetting an increase in
April.  Over the month, manufacturing hours declined by 0.1
hour, and factory overtime was unchanged.

     In May, construction employment was flat across all
component industries--residential and nonresidential
building, heavy construction, and specialty trade
contractors.  Following substantial gains in January and
February, the number of jobs in construction has not changed
significantly in the past 3 months.

     Elsewhere in the goods-producing sector, job growth in
support activities related to oil and gas operations
continued to keep mining employment on an upward trend.

     Average hourly earnings for private sector production
and nonsupervisory workers edged up by 1 cent over the
month, following a 10-cent increase in April.  Over the
year, average hourly earnings have risen by 3.7 percent.

     In May, the unemployment rate was 4.6 percent, down
from 5.1 percent a year earlier.  Over the month, the
civilian labor force participation rate held at 66.1
percent.  Since April 2005, the participation rate has shown
little change, ranging from 66.0 to 66.2 percent.

     In summary, nonfarm payroll employment edged up by
75,000 in May, and the unemployment rate was essentially
unchanged at 4.6 percent.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Brian J. Robinson, certify that:



|1) | I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of General Cable Corporation; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 4, 2013                                            
|                                                               
|/s/ Brian J. Robinson                                          
|Brian J. Robinson                                              
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aspect Medical
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended April 2, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Michael Falvey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Michael Falvey
                                                     ---------------------------
Dated: May 12, 2005                                  Michael Falvey
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at June 30, 1999 (Unaudited) and the Statements of Operations
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,068
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,184
<PP&E>                                       2,221,781
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,919,479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 361,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               16
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     361,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   361,486
<SALES>                                         11,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,294
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,297
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,003)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,003)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (6.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.67)


</TABLE>