alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby
made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 6, 2013, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Special Servicer, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with
respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-375P (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 12.7
of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2013 through
December 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13th day of March 2014.







Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank















Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
EXHIBIT 99.1           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  of Viking
Capital Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, William J. Fossen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  June 10, 2003            /s/ William J. Fossen
                                 ---------------------
                                 William J. Fossen
                                 Chief Executive Officer







                                                                              23
1Larry G. Massanari has been appointed to serve as Acting Commissioner of

Social Security, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3692

___________

Linda Halvorson, on behalf of *

Mark Halvorson, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Larry G. Massanari, Acting * District of North Dakota.

Commissioner of Social Security,1*

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: June 7, 2001

 Filed: June 12, 2001

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
2The Honorable Rodney S. Webb, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of North Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of North

Dakota.

-2-

On behalf of her late husband Mark, Linda Halvorson appeals the district

court’s2 decision affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits.

We review that decision to determine whether it is supported by substantial evidence

on the record as a whole, including the new evidence submitted to the Appeals Council.

See Cunningham v. Apfel, 222 F.3d 496, 500 (8th Cir. 2000).

Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the administrative law

judge (ALJ) properly determined Mark’s residual functional capacity, see Anderson v.

Shalala, 51 F.3d 777, 779 (8th Cir. 1995); and properly evaluated his credibility, see

Haggard v. Apfel, 175 F.3d 591, 594 (8th Cir. 1999) (decision of ALJ who considers,

but for good cause expressly discredits, claimant’s subjective complaints will not be

disturbed). Further, we do not believe that the evidence concerning Mark’s demise was

material to determining whether he was disabled before his insured status expired. See

Bergmann v. Apfel, 207 F.3d 1065, 1069 (8th Cir. 2000) (material evidence is evidence

relating to claimant’s condition for time period for which benefits were denied).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Biotechnology
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2002 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Bruce D. Given, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ BRUCE D. GIVEN, M.D.
-------------------------------------
Bruce D. Given, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 8, 2002
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:         Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C14

  

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of June 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as followsas of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)     Areview of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)    To thebest of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

**Annual Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode), the undersigned officer of Avianca Holdings S.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 of the Company fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: May 1, 2017 

 

Section 906 CFO Certification
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Croghan Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Steven C. Futrell, President and CEO of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Corporation.






Date:  July 23, 2003                       /s/ Steven C. Futrell *
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Steven C. Futrell, President & CEO




* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Croghan Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Croghan Bancshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.












                                       16
retention.htm






  





  





  








Exhibit 10.2

















AT&T Inc.


Equity Retention and Hedging Policy



 







AT&T believes in aligning the long-term interests of officers with those of stockholders. To further that goal and to serve as an example to employees throughout the company, the Human Resources Committee has adopted this Equity Retention and Hedging Policy (the “Policy”).







Retention of Awards







Until one year after termination of their employment with AT&T and its affiliates, each Executive Officer shall retain 25% (after taxes and exercise costs) of the shares of common stock acquired by such officer under an incentive, equity, or option award granted to them after January 1, 2012, other than shares acquired through a deferral plan.









This Policy applies to awards occurring after January 1, 2012, as follows:



	
·  

	
Restricted Stock Units, Restricted Stock and Performance Shares paid in stock — Commitment applies to the net shares issued to the Executive Officer after withholding taxes.








	
·  

	
Stock Options — Commitment applies to net option shares acquired upon exercise of stock options after withholding taxes.












Hedging of AT&T Stock



Our Executive Officers are prohibited from hedging their ownership of AT&T stock, including trading in publicly-traded options, puts, calls, or other derivative instruments related to AT&T stock.  This policy against hedging will also apply after termination of employment with respect to stock awards that are required to be retained for one year after termination of employment.







Stock Ownership Guidelines







Officer-level employees of AT&T shall hold a minimum number of AT&T shares as set forth in the table below.  Shares may be held directly, through a broker, or in a qualified or nonqualified deferral plan.  Qualifying ownership shall include shares held by a spouse; members of the immediate family sharing the same household; or a trust where the employee or family member is a beneficiary.










	
Level

	
Ownership Guideline


	
CEO

	
6 X Base Salary


	
Executive Officers

	
Lesser of 3 X Base Salary or 50,000 Shares


	
Other Officer-Level Employees

	
Lesser of 1 X Base Salary or 25,000 Shares


	
Ownership levels must be achieved within five years from hire, promotion (including designation as an Executive Officer), or company acquisition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at June 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Operations
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,973
<PP&E>                                       1,068,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                 515,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 574,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               52
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     574,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   574,757
<SALES>                                        127,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,897
<CGS>                                           87,064
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               133,305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (92,472)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (92,472)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (92,472)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (33.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (33.36)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7990

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HARVEY LEE DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (5:02-cr-30020-SGW; 7:04-cv-00255-SGW)

Submitted: March 22, 2007 Decided: March 29, 2007

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harvey Lee Davis, Appellant Pro Se. William Frederick Gould, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Harvey Lee Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration

of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.

2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) / Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ George W. ColeGeorge W. ColePresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 19 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 19

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2015

Mr. McConnell submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
June 25, 2015, through Friday, July 3, 2015, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Tuesday, 
July 7, 2015, or such other time on that day as may be specified by its 
Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 
until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House 
adjourns on any legislative day from Thursday, June 25, 2015, through 
Friday, July 3, 2015, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 
until 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 7, 2015, or until the time of any 
reassembly pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee, 
after concurrence with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 
the Members of the Senate to reassemble at such place and time as he 
may designate if, in his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the Senate 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the Senate shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
    Sec. 3. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the House 
to reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if, in his 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION  I, John C. Hoffman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Croghan Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: April 21, 2006 /s/ John C. Hoffman     John C. Hoffman, Assistant Treasurer
19