alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |
|--------|--------------|

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kronos Incorporated (the “Company”) for the period ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Paul A. Lacy, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark V. Julien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   | ____/s/ Paul A. Lacy____________________ |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | May 11, 2006                             | Paul A. Lacy |  
 

President and Principal Executive Officer

 
 

 

____/s/ Mark V. Julien_________________

Dated:

May 11, 2006

Mark V. Julien

 
 

Chief Financial Officer

 
 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kronos Incorporatedand will be retained by Kronos Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. 

 

 

  |
Presidential Documents

41499 

Federal Register 

Vol. 82, No. 168 

Thursday, August 31, 2017 

Title 3— 

The President 

Executive Order 13809 of August 28, 2017 

Restoring State, Tribal, and Local Law Enforcement’s Access 

to Life-Saving Equipment and Resources 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: 

Section 1. Revocation of Executive Order 13688. Executive Order 13688 

of January 16, 2015 (Federal Support for Local Law Enforcement Equipment 

Acquisition), is hereby revoked. 

Sec. 2. Revocation of Recommendations Issued Pursuant to Executive Order 

13688. The recommendations issued pursuant to Executive Order 13688 

do not reflect the policy of the executive branch. All executive departments 

and agencies are directed, as of the date of this order and consistent with 

Federal law, to cease implementing those recommendations and, if necessary, 

to take prompt action to rescind any rules, regulations, guidelines, or policies 

implementing them. 

Sec. 3. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed 

to impair or otherwise affect: 

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or 

the head thereof; or 

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. 

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and 

subject to the availability of appropriations. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with D0
41500 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 168 / Thursday, August 31, 2017 / Presidential Documents 

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, 

substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party 

against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, 

employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

August 28, 2017. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18679 

Filed 8–30–17; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F7–P 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with D0Trump.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE U.S. CODE
  1.
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
(the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Robert S. TaylorRobert S. TaylorExecutive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
Superior Energy Services, Inc.
Exhibit 10.6


         


        Gene Micheal Bennett,

        Gemdale Garden International Building B,

         Suite 20-C, #91 Jian Guo Road, ChaoYang District

         Beijing, P.R.C 100022

         

        January 4, 2008


        


        Re: Service about being independent
        director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of China Pharma Holdings, Inc


        


        Dear Mr. Bennett,


        


        On behalf of the Board of Directions and the Company, I am pleased to welcome you to join the Board of the China Pharma Holdings, Inc as an independent director and Chairman of the Audit Committee. I look forward to working with you. Your starting date will be the date of the board approves your engagement and your
        engagement for this term will end on the date of the next annual shareholders meeting.

          

        Your compensation will consist of the following:

        


        


        	
                	
                    1)     

                	
                    A retainer of $16,000 per year, payable quarterly within 5 days of the start of the quarter;

                


        


        	
                	
                    2)     

                	5,000 warrants of common stocks with an exercise price $3.32 per share which is determined by the average stock price of 15 days before December
                19th 2007. The warrants will be vested on the anniversary date of the board resolution. The warrants issued will be subject to the warrants plan to be adopted by the Company.


        

        

        



        


        If you agree to the terms and conditions stated above, please sign and date this letter below.

          

        I look forward to working with you and sincerely hope that your service will be enjoyable and rewarding.


        


        Sincerely


        


        Chairman of the Board

         China Pharma Holdings, Inc

         


        


        Response:

        This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of Gene Michael Bennett.

         

        By: _________________________________


        Date:________________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 22-0518

ROBERT A. BENNETT, JR.,

Petitioner,

v. JASON VALDEZ,

Respondent. 

### OCT 0 4 2022
Bowen c..1reenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER '

RobertA.Bennett,Jr.petitionsthisCourt forhabeas corpusrelief, indicating illegal incarcerationbecause he did not receive discovery ofmaterials inhistwopendingcriminal
cases after asking his counsel and the prosecuting attorney for such delivery. He asserts that his right to a speedy trial and right to due process have both been violated. Bennett requests his immediate release from the Yellowstone County Detention Center and dismissal ofthe criminal cases. We requested and reviewed the register ofactions for Bennett's pending case. On May 7, 2021, the Yellowstone County District Court granted leave to the State to file its information and issued an arrest warrant with a $50,000 bond. Bennett was arrested in Gallatin County. The court arraigned him in July 2021. On January 3, 2022, the court issued an order, committing Bennett to the State Hospital for examination, and since then, it has held several trial status hearings. In June 2022, the court issued an order extending Bennett's commitment. Within the last month, the court has reset thejury trial twice. Bennett is not entitled to release or dismissal of his cases in the District Court. Habeas corpus is not the remedy for Bennett's discovery request claim. Habeas corpus is not the remedy for alleged constitutional violations, such as speedy trial and due process. Gates v. Missoula Cnty. Comm'rs, 235 Mont. 261, 262, 766 P.2d 884, 884-85 (1988). His remedy would be an appeal ofa final sentencingjudgment. Section 46-20-104(1), MCA. 10/04/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0518Bennett has not demonstrated that he is illegally incarcerated. Section 46-22-

101(1), MCA. Bennett should refrain from filingpleadings onhisownbehalfwiththisCourtwhile he is represented by counsel in the District Court. M. R. App. P. 10(1)(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Bennett's Petition for a Writ ofHabeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to: Terry Halpin, Clerk of District Court, under Cause No. DC 21-629, for distribution of copies to the presiding District Court Judge and counsel ofrecord there;counsel ofrecord, and RobertA.Bennett, Jr. personally. DATED this 2

4) day ofOctober, 2022.

2
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 13 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to applying laws equally to the citizens of the United States and the 

Federal Government. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2015 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to applying laws equally to the citizens 

of the United States and the Federal Government. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 13 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Congress shall make no law applicable 

3 to a citizen of the United States that is not equally appli4 cable to Congress. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall make no law applicable 

6 to a citizen of the United States that is not equally appli7 cable to the executive branch of Government, including the 

8 President, Vice President, ambassadors, other public min9 isters and consuls, and all other officers of the United 

10 States, including those provided for under this Constitu11 tion and by law, and inferior officers to the President es12 tablished by law. 

13 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall make no law applicable 

14 to a citizen of the United States that is not equally appli15 cable to judges of the Supreme Court of the United States, 

16 including the Chief Justice, and judges of such inferior 

17 courts as Congress may from time to time ordain and es18 tablish. 

19 ‘‘SECTION 4. Nothing in this article shall preempt 

20 any specific provision of this Constitution.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Patent

## Title
Olefins from methanol and/or dimethyl ether

## Abstract

What is claimed is:

## Background
## Claims

1.  A process for adding flourine across the double bonds in a highly halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon which comprises the step of effecting an addition reaction between a highly halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon and a hydrogen fluoride solvent solution of NF.sub.4 BF.sub.4.

2. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said highly halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon is tetrafluorobenzene.

3. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said highly halogenated aramatic hydrocarbon is pentafluorobenzene.

4. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said highly halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon is hexafluorobenzene.
<PAGE>   1
Allied Capital Commercial Corporation
Exhibit 11 Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
Form 10-Q
March 31, 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                For the Three Months Ended
                                                          March 31,
                                               -----------------------------
                                                  1997            1996
                                               -----------------------------
<S>                                              <C>             <C>
Primary Earnings Per Common Share:           

  Net Income                                     $6,636,000      $6,855,000
                                               =============================

  Weighted average of common                 
       shares outstanding                        14,277,729      13,756,773

  Weighted average of common                 
       shares issuable on exercise           
       of outstanding stock options                 136,386          58,237
                                               -----------------------------

  Weighted average of common                 
       shares outstanding, as adjusted           14,414,115      13,815,010
                                               =============================

  Net Income per share                                $0.46           $0.50
                                               =============================

Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:     

  Net Income                                     $6,636,000      $6,855,000
                                               =============================

  Weighted average common                    
       shares and common share               
       equivalents as computed for           
       primary earnings per share                14,414,115      13,815,010

  Weighted average of additional             
       shares issuable on exercise           
       of outstanding stock options                     453          11,201
                                               -----------------------------

  Weighted average of common                 
       shares outstanding, as adjusted           14,414,568      13,826,211
                                               =============================

  Net Income assuming full dilution                   $0.46           $0.50
                                               =============================
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 970 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 970

To allow more small insured depository institutions to qualify for the 
      18-month on-site examination cycle, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2015

  Mr. Toomey (for himself and Mr. Donnelly) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow more small insured depository institutions to qualify for the 
      18-month on-site examination cycle, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF THRESHOLD FOR 18-MONTH ON-SITE EXAMINATION 
              CYCLE.

    Section 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 
1820(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking ``$500,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$1,000,000,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (10), by striking ``$500,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$1,000,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
theConsolidated Financial Statements at September 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEPT-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,295
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               6
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     80,018
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            80,018
<LOANS>                                        456,857
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 556,836
<DEPOSITS>                                     365,991
<SHORT-TERM>                                    52,839
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,344
<LONG-TERM>                                     80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 556,836
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,518
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,074
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   596
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,188
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,110
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,120
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,068
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      841
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (15)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,049
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,383
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,383
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,893
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.34
<LOANS-NON>                                        550
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,312
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      648
<RECOVERIES>                                        66
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,571
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,571
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,571


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Arthur Billy COLEMAN, a/k/a James Eric Nash, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-7310.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 25, 2008.

Arthur Billy Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Hollis Raphael Weisman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Billy Coleman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Coleman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encysive Pharmaceuticals
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Stephen L. Mueller, Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ STEPHEN L. MUELLER
------------------------------------------------------
Stephen L. Mueller
Vice President, Finance and Administration
Secretary & Treasurer

November 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Encysive
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7931

JARON BRICE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District 

Judge. (1:15-cv-01274-AJT-MSN)

Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jaron Brice, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jaron Brice, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny 

Brice’s motion for summary judgment and his motion for bail, and 

dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Brice v. United States, No. 1:15-cv-01274-AJT-MSN (E.D. Va. Oct. 

30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED