alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
200 West Street
New York, New York 10282


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
    Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-GCJ12

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 10, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Exhibit 31

SEMT 2013-6

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

I, Christopher J. Abate, certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-6 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.

Date: March 30, 2018



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ Christopher J. Abate
|Signature               

Chairman of the Board and President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
(logo)Prudential

 

 

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

RE:         **WFRBS 2013-C14**

Period: **January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019(the “Reporting Period”)**

 

**AnnualCompliance Statement**

 

 

I,Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity as President and Managing Director ofPrudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify with regard tothe Company’s role as Sub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the“Agreement”) dated as of June 1, 2013, pertaining to the above-referencedcertificates, that:

 

(i)      areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the periodnoted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement duringthe relevant period has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii)    to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

(iii)   to the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligationsunder its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

(iv)    the Company hasmaintained an effective internal control system over the servicing of mortgageloans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

(v)    theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification, or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

 

Effectiveas of February 21, 2020

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19021]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Temporary Emergency Committee of the Board of Governors; Sunshine 
Act Meeting

DATES AND TIMES: Tuesday, September 12, 2017, at 8:00 a.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Tuesday, September 12, 2017, at 8:00 a.m.

    1. Financial Matters.
    2. Strategic Issues.
    3. Personnel and Compensation Items.
    4. Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items and 
Temporary Emergency Committee governance.

GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The General Counsel of the United States 
Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed under the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19021 Filed 9-1-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 230 

Designating September 25, 2015, as ‘‘National Lobster Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2015 

Mr. KING (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. 

REED, Ms. AYOTTE, and Mr. MURPHY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 25, 2015, as ‘‘National Lobster 

Day’’. 

Whereas lobster from the United States is recognized around 

the world as a prized culinary delicacy; 

Whereas lobster fishing has served as an economic engine and 

a family tradition in the United States for centuries; 

Whereas thousands of families in the United States make 

their livelihoods from lobster fishing and processing; 

Whereas more than 120,000,000 pounds of lobster are 

caught each year in waters of the United States, representing one of the Nation’s most valuable catches; 

Whereas the lobster industry is booming abroad, with profits 

climbing from $335,800,000 in 2009 to $738,600,000 in 

2014; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 230 IS 

Whereas historical lore notes that lobster likely joined turkey 

on the table at the very first Thanksgiving Day feast in 

1621; 

Whereas responsible lobstering practices, beginning in the 

1600s, have created one of the world’s most sustainable 

fisheries; 

Whereas Lobster Newburg was featured on the menu at the 

inaugural dinner celebration for President John F. Kennedy; 

Whereas lobsters are one of the most healthy and nutritious 

sources of protein; 

Whereas the peak of the lobstering season in the United 

States occurs in the late summer; 

Whereas lobster has become a culinary icon, with the lobster 

roll being featured at the 2015 World Food Expo in 

Milan, Italy; and 

Whereas lobster is featured on more and more restaurant 

menus, growing by 35 percent from 2009 to 2013: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 25, 2015, as ‘‘Na3 tional Lobster Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18132]



[[Page 40580]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY:  Federal Election Commission.

DATE AND TIME:  Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 3:00 p.m.

PLACE:  999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS:  This meeting was closed to the public.

Items Discussed: Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.
* * * * *

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-18132 Filed 8-23-17; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1552

CURLEE SHERMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GREENPOINT CREDIT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District

Judge. (CA-04-1036-5)

Submitted: August 25, 2004 Decided: September 20, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curlee Sherman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Curlee Sherman appeals the district court’s judgment

adopting the magistrate judge’s order that dismissed his complaint

pursuant to a previously entered prefiling review order. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman

v. Greenpoint Credit, No. CA-04-1036-5 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 26, 2004,

entered Apr. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0403

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ANDRE JAMES ANTHONY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 13, 2024 within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 5 2024

02/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0403
#### Victor Manuel Islas GODOY; Georgina Martinez Medina, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74736.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007 **.

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Arnold S. Jaffe, Esq., Law Office of Arnold S. Jaffe, Santa Barbara, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of *938Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Daniel Glenn Lonergan, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Victor Manuel Islas Godoy and his wife Georgina Martinez Medina seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their applications for cancellation of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings, *see Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir.2001), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review petitioners’ contentions regarding the IJ’s denial of petitioners’ motion for a continuance, the IJ’s impartiality, and the ineffective assistance of petitioners’ former counsel because petitioners failed to raise these issues before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (explaining that this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the agency).

We are not persuaded that petitioners’ removal results in the deprivation of their children’s rights. *See Cabrera-Alvarez v. Gonzales,*423 F.3d 1006, 1012-13 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Summary of compensation arrangement with Heinz Haller



 Exhibit 10.56 
 Summary of Compensation Package for Mr. Heinz Haller 
 On August 29, 2011, the board of
directors of BioAmber Inc. (the “Company”) approved a compensation package for Mr. Heinz Haller for his service as an independent director of the Corporation, consisting of: 

 

	 	a.	an annual fee of $35,000 with a payment schedule to be determined by the Chief Executive Officer; and 


 

	 	b.	the grant of options to purchase 500 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Company’s stock option plan with an exercise price of US$369.14 per
share. The options vest over two years: 50% at the first anniversary date of the election of Mr. Heinz Haller as a director of the Corporation and 50% at the second anniversary date of the election of Mr. Heinz Haller as a director of the
Company. 

 Mr. Haller does not have a written agreement with respect to director compensation.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133334 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133334 COA: 261458 Oakland CC: 04-197600-FH JAMES REDMOND, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 14, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0914 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 21, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 4.1


 




	
  

  	
  PRESIDENT CHIEF
  FINANCIAL OFFICER This Certifies that is the record holder of INCORPORATED
  UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
  CUSIP 36191X 10 0 FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.01
  PAR VALUE, OF GSE HOLDING, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation
  by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender
  of this Certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until
  countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. WITNESS
  the facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly authorized officers.
  Dated: GSE COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST
  COMPANY, LLC (Brooklyn, NY) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED
  SIGNATURE GSE HOLDING, INC. SPECIMEN 

  






 


 












	
  

  	
  FOR VALUE
  RECEIVED, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY
  OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND
  ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the common stock
  represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute
  and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within
  named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated
  Signature(s) Guaranteed By THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE
  GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND
  CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION
  PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT
  MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE
  IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE
  WHATEVER. X X NOTICE: The following abbreviations, when used in the
  inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though
  they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:
  TEN COM TEN ENT JT TEN as tenants in common as tenants by the entireties as
  joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UNIF
  GIFT MIN ACT– Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
  (State) UNIF TRF MIN ACT– Custodian (until age ) (Cust) under Uniform
  Transfers (Minor) to Minors Act (State) – – – Additional abbreviations may
  also be used though not in the above list. SPECIMEN
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 2355** 

MARLOW L. BATES, SR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SONY CORP OF AMERICA; L G ELECTRONICS USA, INC.; MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONI CS USA INC.; PANASONIC ELECTRIC WORKS CORP. OF AMERICA , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 03158

- JFM )

Submitted : A pril 23, 2012 Decided: April 27, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion
.
Marlow L. Bates, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Daniel P. Doty , Julie Rebecca Rubin , ASTRACHAN GUNST AND THOMAS PC, Baltimo re, Maryland; David Ira Ackerman, SNR DENTON US LLP , Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marlow L. Bates, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Samsung's motio n to dismiss his civil action . We remand for consideration of whether reopening of the appeal period is merited
. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The timely filing of a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) extends the start of t he appeal period until the entry of the district court’s order adjudicating the Rule 59(e) motion. “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bow l e s v. Russell , 551 U.S. 2 0 5, 2 1 4 ( 2007 ). The district co urt’s order was entered on the docket

on July 20, 2011
. The order denying Bates’s Rule 59(e) motion was entered on the docket on August 18, 2011. Bates filed a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal on October 20, 2011, which the dist rict court has not addressed
. Bates filed a notice of appeal on December 7, 2011
. B ates ’s notice of appeal is clearly untimely. However, under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6), the district court may3 reopen the time to file an appeal if (1) the moving party did

n ot receive notice of entry of judgment within twenty

- one days after entry, (2) the motion is filed within 180 days of entry of judgment or within fourteen days of receiving notice from the court, whichever is earlier, and (3) no party would be prejudiced. In his motion for extension of time, Bates stated that he did not receive notice of the district court’s denial of his Rule 59(e) motion until October 18, 2011. We accordingly remand for the limited purpose of permitting the district court to determine w hether Bates’s motion for an extension of time should be construed as a motion to reopen the appeal period, and if so, whether reopening is merited. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15
                     INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of
March 31, 1997, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations
and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 1997 and 1996. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical review
procedures to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an
audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which
will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for
them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Collaborative Clinical Research,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then
ended, not presented herein, and in our report dated February 13, 1997, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In
our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1996 is fairly stated, in all
material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it
has been derived.

Cleveland, Ohio                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP
April 30, 1997