alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 106 

Designating March 22, 2015, as ‘‘National Rehabilitation Counselors 

Appreciation Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 19, 2015 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself and Mr. CASEY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 22, 2015, as ‘‘National Rehabilitation 

Counselors Appreciation Day’’. 

Whereas rehabilitation counselors conduct assessments, provide counseling, support families, and plan and implement rehabilitation programs for individuals in need of 

rehabilitation; 

Whereas the purpose of professional organizations for rehabilitation counseling and education is to promote the improvement of rehabilitation services available to individuals with disabilities through quality education for counselors and rehabilitation research; 

Whereas various professional organizations have vigorously 

advocated up-to-date education and training and the 

maintenance of professional standards in the field of rehabilitation counseling and education, including— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 106 ATS 

(1) the National Rehabilitation Association; 

(2) the Rehabilitation Counselors and Educators Association; 

(3) the National Council on Rehabilitation Education; 

(4) the National Rehabilitation Counseling Association; 

(5) the American Rehabilitation Counseling Association; 

(6) the Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor 

Certification; 

(7) the Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation; and 

(8) the Council on Rehabilitation Education; 

Whereas, on March 22, 1983, the president of the National 

Council on Rehabilitation Education, testified before the 

Subcommittee on Select Education of the Committee on 

Education and Labor of the House of Representatives, 

and was instrumental in bringing the need for qualified 

rehabilitation counselors to the attention of Congress; 

and 

Whereas the efforts of the National Council on Rehabilitation 

Education led to the enactment of laws that require rehabilitation counselors to have proper credentials, in order 

to provide a higher quality of service to those in need of 

rehabilitation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 22, 2015, as ‘‘National 

3 Rehabilitation Counselors Appreciation Day’’; and 

4 (2) commends— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 106 ATS 

1 (A) rehabilitation counselors, for the dedi2 cation and hard work rehabilitation counselors 

3 provide to individuals in need of rehabilitation; 

4 and 

5 (B) professional organizations, for the ef6 forts professional organizations have made to 

7 assist those who require rehabilitation. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-4143

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN ZIEGLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (7:05-cr-0084-gra)

Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 24, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Barlow Loggins, Assistant Federal Public Defender,

Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Maxwell Barnes Cauthen,

III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Ziegler pled guilty to one count of possession of

child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2252A(a)(5)(B)

(West 2000 & Supp. 2006). The district court sentenced Ziegler to

forty-six months of imprisonment, the bottom of the applicable

advisory Guideline range. On appeal, counsel filed an Anders*

brief, in which he states there are no meritorious issues for

appeal, but suggests that the district court failed to comply with

the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 in the guilty plea hearing.

Ziegler was advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental

brief, but has not filed a brief. We affirm.

Because Ziegler did not move in the district court to

withdraw his guilty plea, his challenge to the adequacy of the Rule

11 hearing is reviewed for plain error. See United States v.

Martinez, 277 F.3d 517, 525 (4th Cir. 2002). Our review of the

plea hearing transcript reveals that the district court conducted

a thorough Rule 11 colloquy that assured Ziegler’s plea was made

both knowingly and voluntarily. See United States v. DeFusco, 949

F.2d 114, 117, 120 (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we find Ziegler’s

guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and properly accepted by the

district court.

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for
- 3 -

appeal. We therefore affirm Ziegler’s conviction and sentence.

This court requires that counsel inform Ziegler, in writing, of the

right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for

further review. If Ziegler requests that a petition be filed, but

counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then

counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from

representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof

was served on Ziegler.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert E. Dye, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peoples Bancorporation,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         d)  disclosed  in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: August 10, 2004                    s/Robert E. Dye, Jr.
      ---------------                    ----------------------------------
                                         Robert E. Dye, Jr.
                                         Chief Financial Officer
Unemployment rates, foreign-born and native-born populations, by sex, 2007 and 2008 


		          Percent	

			2007	2008

Foreign born	Total	4.3	5.8
		Men	4.1	5.7
		Women	4.6	6.0
Native born	Total	4.7	5.8
		Men	4.9	6.2
		Women	4.5	5.3
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Health Fitness Corporation;2
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   /s/ Gregg O. LehmanGregg O. LehmanPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 15, 2007
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 12 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to marriage. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2015 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to marriage. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 by the Congress: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 12 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The United States and each State, terri3 tory, and possession thereof shall have the power to define 

4 marriage as limited to the union of one man and one 

5 woman. Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed 

6 to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be 

7 conferred upon any union other than the union of one man 

8 and one woman or to require that a State recognize a mar9 riage that was licensed in another State. No decision or 

10 order of any court to the contrary, including any decision 

11 or order issued before the date of ratification, shall have 

12 any force or effect.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3474 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3474

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2016

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Law Enforcement Heroes Act 
of 2016''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VETERANS.

    Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting 
``, including by prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as 
defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)'' after 
``Nation''.
                                 <all>
```
v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BUREAU OF 

INDIAN AFFAIRS; DANA BULLCOMING, 

agent of the Bureau of Indian Affairs sued in his 

individual capacity, 

Defendants and Appellees. 

ORDER 

Linda Morris of New York City, N.Y., has petitioned for permission to appear pro hac 

vice before this Court in the above-entitled cause. 

Having reviewed the application and having determined that, as required by our 

Rules for Admission to the Bar of Montana, Petitioner is currently in good standing 

with another state jurisdiction in which Petitioner is adrnitted to the practice of law, 

Montana counsel listed in the application is in good standing with the State Bar of 

Montana, and this is the first appearance of Petitioner and the fourteenth appearance of 

Petitioner's firm under the pro hac vice rules, with good cause showing under Rule VI(C), 

- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application of Linda Morris to appear pro hac vice 

in the above-entitled cause is GRANTED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Linda Morris, to all counsel of 

record in this appeal, and,tge State Bar of Montana. 

DATED this 5" day of October, 2021. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 34 

To prohibit assistance to the Palestinian Authority until it withdraws its 

request to join the International Criminal Court. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit assistance to the Palestinian Authority until it 

withdraws its request to join the International Criminal 

Court. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defend Israel by 

5 Defunding Palestinian Foreign Aid Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

8 (1) On December 31, 2014, Mahmoud Abbas, 

9 the President of the Palestinian Authority, signed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 34 IS

1 several international conventions in an attempt to 

2 join the International Criminal Court. 

3 (2) The Palestinian Authority has indicated 

4 that it will seek to use the International Criminal 

5 Court as a means to pursue charges against Israel. 

6 (3) The Palestinian Authority remains engaged 

7 in a unity government with Hamas, a terrorist orga8 nization responsible for countless deaths and whose 

9 charter declares that ‘‘there is no solution to the 

10 Palestinian question except by Jihad’’. 

11 (4) The United States provides more than 

12 $400,000,000 in assistance to the Palestinian Au13 thority each year. 

14 (5) Section 7041(i)(2) of the Department of 

15 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 

16 Appropriations Act, 2015 (division J of Public Law 

17 133–235) includes limitations on assistance to the 

18 Palestinian Authority if it seeks to join the Inter19 national Criminal Court. 

20 (6) The United States Government must make 

21 immediately clear to the Palestinian Authority that 

22 its attempts to join the International Criminal Court 

23 will carry serious consequences. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 34 IS

1 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING. 

2 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 

3 amounts may be obligated or expended to provide any as4 sistance, loan guarantee, or debt relief to the Palestinian 

5 Authority, or any affiliated governing entity, until the Pal6 estinian Authority withdraws its request to join the Inter7 national Criminal Court. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 38 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 38

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule relating to the extent to which 
 employers may use incentives to encourage employees to participate in 
   wellness programs that ask the employees to respond to disability-
           related inquiries or undergo medical examinations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2016

 Mr. Alexander (for himself, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Perdue) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule relating to the extent to which 
 employers may use incentives to encourage employees to participate in 
   wellness programs that ask the employees to respond to disability-
           related inquiries or undergo medical examinations.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating 
to the extent to which employers may use incentives to encourage 
employees to participate in wellness programs that ask the employees to 
respond to disability-related inquiries or undergo medical examinations 
under title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 
12111 et seq.) (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 31126 (May 17, 2016)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Dec 19, 2011 8-K exhibit 10.1








Exhibit 10.1
AMENDMENT 20 TO THE
SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT




This Amendment 20 (this “Amendment”), effective this 30th day of November, 2011 is made to the Supply and Distribution Agreement dated April 3, 1995, as amended,  between ICU Medical Sales, Inc. (“ICU”) and Hospira, Inc. (“Hospira”) relating to the purchase and sales of certain Products (the “Agreement”).  


The parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


		
	1.
	Incorporation of the Agreement.  All capitalized terms which are not defined herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Agreement, and the Agreement, to the extent not inconsistent with this Amendment, is incorporated herein by this reference as though the same was set forth in its entirety.  To the extent any terms and provisions of the Agreement are inconsistent with the amendments set forth below, such terms and provisions shall be deemed superseded hereby.  Except as specifically set forth herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and its provisions shall be binding on the parties hereto.




		
	2.
	Extension of Term.  The first sentence of Section 14 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




This Agreement shall be effective on the Effective Date, and, unless otherwise terminated in accordance with Section 15, shall expire on December 31, 2018.


		
	3.
	Effectuation.  The amendments to the Agreement contemplated by this Amendment shall be deemed effective as of the date first written above upon the full execution of this Amendment and without any further action required by the parties hereto.  There are no conditions precedent or subsequent to the effectiveness of this Amendment.




		
	4.
	Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  One or more counterparts of this Amendment may be delivered by facsimile, with the intention that delivery by such means shall have the same effect as delivery of an original counterpart thereof.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, intending to be bound by the terms and conditions hereof, have caused this Amendment to be signed by their duly authorized representatives.


    
	
			
	HOSPIRA, INC.
	 
	ICU MEDICAL SALES, INC.

	By:  /s/ Mike Ball
	 
	By:  /s/ George A. Lopez, M.D.

	  Mike Ball
	 
	  George A. Lopez, M.D.

	  Chief Executive Officer
	 
	  Chief Executive Officer