alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Therapeutic Delivery of AFP-Ribsoylarginine Hydrolase.                     

*Date:*                         September 19, 2017                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7178, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         William J. Johnson, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7178, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-827-7938,                         *johnsonw@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 24, 2017.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-18344 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the
applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in
his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto)
(the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling
and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC,a Florida limited liability companyBy:

/s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident


Dated: February 23, 2016





1601 Washington Avenue 
Suite 700  Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601



---

Schedule I

CGCMT 2013-GCJ11

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-GCJ11

Citibank, N.A.,

Global Transaction Services

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York NY 10013

John Hannon

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 11th Floor

New York NY 10013

Angela Vleck

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich
Street, 5th Floor

New York NY 10013

Paul Vanderslice

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 19th Floor

New York NY 10013

Richard Simpson

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 17th Floor

New York NY 10013

Ryan M. OConnor

Pentalpha Surveillance LLC

375 N. French Road, Suite 100

Amherst NY 14228

Don Simon
#### La Croix *v.*May and others.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

January, 1883.)

1. Teade-Maeks—Rights of Aliens—Property in, as Affected by Acts of Congress.

The fact that one is an alien does not afEeet his right of property in a trademark ; but that fact is a necessary allegation to establish the requisite diversity of citizenship to confer jurisdiction upon a federal court. The acts of congress fortify the common-law right to a trade-mark by conferring a statutory title upon the owner, but “property in trade-marks does not derive its existence from an act of congress.” 100 U. S. 82. By the express terms of section 10 of the present act of congress the common-law right in trade-marks is preserved • intact.

2. Same—Demurrer.

Where the demurrer was to the whole hill, and the bill was in itself sufficient, aside from the allegations contained in it, upon which the demurrer was taken, the demurrer was overruled.

*S. W. Weiss,*for complainant.

*Briesen é Betts,*for defendants. >

Wallace, J.

The facts alleged in the complainant’s bill entitle .him to an injunction restraining defendants from the use of his trade*237mark, irrespective of tlie lights which he acquired by the registration of his trade-mark under the act of congress of March 3, 1881. *Taylor*v. *Carpenter,*3 Story, 458; 2 Wood. & M. 1; *Taylor*v. *Carpenter,*11 Paige, 296. The fact that complainant is an alien does not affect his right of property in a trade-mark; but that fact, as it establishes the requisite diversity of citizenship between the parties to confer jurisdiction upon this court, is indispensable to the cause of action alleged.

The act of congress fortifies the common-law light to a trade-mark by conferring a statutory title upon the owner; but, as was said of a former act, *(The Trade-mark Cases,*100 U. S. 82,) “property in trademarks does not derive its existence from an act of congress.” The present act does not abridge or qualify the common-law right, but, by the express term of section 10, preserves it intact.

The theory of the demurrer is that the complainant’s statutory title upon the allegations of the bill is invalid. It is not necessary to decide the questions raised, because, as the demurrer is to the whole bill, the bill is sufficient if all the allegations concerning a registration of the trade-mark were eliminated.

• Demurrer is overruled.

See *Barton*v. *Stratton,*12 Fed. Rep. 696, and note, 704, and *Shaw Stocking Co.*v. *Mack,*Id. 707, and note, 717
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 21 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 21

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony to commemorate the 150th Anniversary of the ratification 
                         of the 13th Amendment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 5, 2015

   Mr. Booker (for himself, Mr. Scott, and Mr. Durbin) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony to commemorate the 150th Anniversary of the ratification 
                         of the 13th Amendment.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO COMMEMORATE THE 
              150TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE RATIFICATION OF THE 13TH 
              AMENDMENT.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on July 8, 2015, for a ceremony to commemorate 
the 150th Anniversary of the ratification of the 13th Amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States, which abolished slavery in the 
United States.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Section 1350 Certification -- Principal Financial Officer**

 

**Citizens Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citizens Financial Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, Len E. Schweitzer, Vice President and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| By:    | /s/ Len E. Schweitzer                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                  |
|   | Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

Date: November 14, 2005

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Citizens Financial Corporation and will be retained by CFC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND

#### Catherine D. Fletcher v. Jason Matthew Tooley, Belk, Inc., and Belk Stores of Va., Inc.

May 29, 2002

Case No. LP-807-1

By Judge Melvin R. Hughes, Jr.

In this case, the defendants seek to transfer venue to the Circuit Court of Albemarle County under the provisions of Va. Code § 8.01-265 citing the convenience of the parties and witnesses as good cause.

The case arises out of an alleged shoplifting incident at the Belk store in the Fashion Square Mall, located just outside of Charlottesville in Albemarle County. Defendant Jason Tooley, a Belk security guard resides in Orange County. Belk, Inc., and Belk Stores of Virginia, Inc. (collectively Belk), have headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina. Venue lies here because Belk has its registered agent here.

According to defendants, as the events of April 6, 2000, unfolded which ultimately led to plaintiff, a Louisa County resident, being charged with concealment in the Albemarle County Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, store personnel, other security agents, as well as local police became involved as witnesses. Asserting that Richmond offers a mere technical connection to the case at best with no nexus here, defendants urge the case should transfer.

Plaintiff argues that counsel cannot advance that the witnesses would be inconvenienced without evidence and since defendants have the burden on their motion, the motion should fail. The court disagrees.

Although defendants offered no evidence, there is no dispute that the witnesses live and work outside of Richmond, in Louisa, Albemarle, *514Stanardsville (Greene County), and Charlottesville. And even though plaintiff argues that corporate witnesses will find Richmond more accessible because of an airport here, she also acknowledges that there is an airport in Charlottesville. So, the case is made for substantial inconvenience of the parties and witnesses for trial here as opposed to Albemarle, where proximity for the parties and witnesses clearly outweigh that of this forum.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Croghan Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Allan E. Mehlow, Treasurer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Corporation.

Date: April 22, 2004                          /s/  Allan E. Mehlow
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Allan E. Mehlow, Treasurer

* This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a -14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed "filed" for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as otherwise stated in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                           11228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    11895
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     323495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                357836
<PP&E>                                          116261
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  553737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           387214
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                       28433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    553737
<SALES>                                        1029699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1039794
<CGS>                                           717247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   717247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                327912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               21819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (27184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (27184)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (27184)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.73)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 7 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.7
                                        Agreed to March 16, 2015        

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO PRESENT 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO WORLD WAR II MEMBERS OF 
              DOOLITTLE TOKYO RAIDERS.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on April 15, 2015, for a ceremony to present 
the Congressional Gold Medal to the World War II members of the 
Doolittle Tokyo Raiders, collectively, in recognition of the military 
service and exemplary record of the Doolittle Tokyo Raiders during 
World War II.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 21, 2012

h0514 

# Order

May 21, 2012

144443

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144443 COA: 299928 Kalamazoo CC: 2009-002038 FC WILLIAM DARNELL COLLIER, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 22, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Ronnie EWINGS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry O’BRIEN, Warden, USP Hazelton, Respondent-Appellee, and United States Parole Commission, Respondent.

No. 12-7660.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*197PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Ewings, a District of Columbia Code offender, seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85,120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ewings has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
No. 1172.

No. 1173.

#### Guiseppe Bozzo Fu Lorenzo *v.*United States et al.; Rosasco *v.*United States et al.; *864Mariano Maresca & Co. *v.*United States et al.; and “Italia”-Societa Anonima Di Navigazione *v.*United States et al.

No. 1174. No. 1175.

June 10, 1946.

*Homer L. Loomis*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General Sonnett, Joseph B. Goldman, David Schwartz*and *Raoul Berger*for the United States and the Alien Property Custodian.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
#### Marciano D. SALVANIA, Claimant-Appellant, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2007-7102.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 10, 2008.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs responds to the court’s November 19, 2007 order and requests that the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) in *Salvania v. Nicholson,*05-2116 be summarily re*272versed. Marciano D. Salvania has not responded.

Salvania appealed from the CAVC’s decision, challenging the court’s placement of the burden on him to establish that a 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) notification error was prejudicial. In *Sanders v. Nicholson,*487 F.3d 881 (Fed.Cir.2007) this court held that any section 5103(a) error should be presumed prejudicial and the Secretary has the burden of rebutting this presumption. *Id.*at 891. Under these circumstances, summary reversal is appropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The judgment of the CAVC is summarily reversed. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.