alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 730 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 730

  To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 
                                 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 2015

  Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Ms. Warren, Mr. Reed, Mr. Franken, Ms. 
Stabenow, and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the following bill; which was 
read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 
                                 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Permanently Protecting Tenants at 
Foreclosure Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF THE PROTECTING TENANTS AT FORECLOSURE ACT OF 
              2009.

    (a) Repeal of Sunset Provision.--Section 704 of the Protecting 
Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 (12 U.S.C. 5201 note; 12 U.S.C. 5220 
note; 42 U.S.C. 1437f note) is repealed.
    (b) Restoration.--Sections 701 through 703 of such Act, the 
provisions of law amended or repealed by such sections, and any 
regulations promulgated pursuant to such sections, as were in effect on 
December 31, 2014, are restored and revived as if the sunset provision 
in section 704 had not taken effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### AUTOMATIC LAUNDRY SERVICE, Inc. et al. v. TELECOIN CORP. et al.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

May 17, 1954.

Arnold Malkan, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Hawkins, Delafield & Wood, New York City, for defendants.

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, in a treble damage antitrust suit, move for a sweeping discovery and inspection, and defendants oppose the motion in its entirety, as presented. The case is a companion to Bascom Launder Corp. v. Telecoin Corp., 2 Cir., 204 F.2d 331, in which a judgment for plaintiffs was reversed and remanded for a new trial. The issues as defined by the Court of Appeals in the Bascom case are pertinent to the case at bar, and unquestionably justify broad discovery by the plaintiffs. A number of the plaintiffs’ requests, taken alone, might be granted, and the germ of relevancy is discernable generally, but it is all but smothered in elaboration. They have for the most part thrown discretion to the winds. Even where basic relevancy is obvious, they have asked for everything conceivable and added a catch-all to include the inconceivable. Almost no attempt has been made to limit demands to relevant periods of time. In view of the fact that more than 80 categories and sub-categories of documents are asked for, the resulting burden upon the defendants is too oppressive to be permitted. It would, perhaps, be helpful for plaintiffs to pursue preliminary examination in order to ascertain the existence of documents and to narrow down the identification of categories. But in *27any event, plaintiffs must sharpen their requests. The motion will be denied, but without prejudice to a further application based upon a more selective identification.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,697
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     38,599
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          41,202
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            40,830
<LOANS>                                        233,972
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 345,943
<DEPOSITS>                                     291,824
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,296
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,124
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,847
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 345,943
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,860
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,196
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   112
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,168
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,416
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,868
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,300
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,078
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,466
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,300
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,300
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.33
<LOANS-NON>                                        436
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,791
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,533
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,418
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      478
<RECOVERIES>                                       136
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,256
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               180
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-QSB AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,881,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    125,884
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,201,963
<PP&E>                                         343,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                 229,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,326,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,510,902
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,679,158
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       112,908
<OTHER-SE>                                   (976,364)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,326,603
<SALES>                                        140,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,888
<CGS>                                           99,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,009,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,074,138)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,074,138)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,074,138)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joe Mack POOL, Appellant.

No. 07-1736.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2008.

Filed: Jan. 24, 2008.

Angela Sue Jegley, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, for Appellee.

Joseph Blake Hendrix, Little Rock, AR, for Appellant.

Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Joe Mack Pool (Pool) appeals the prison sentence the district court imposed following remand. We again remand for resentencing.

Pool was found guilty of conspiring to commit bribery and money laundering, and multiple counts of aiding and abetting bribery and money laundering. His Guidelines imprisonment range was 33-41 months. After considering dozens of character letters, the testimony of several supportive witnesses, and each 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factor, the district court sen*931tenced Pool to 5 years of probation, with the first year to be served in a halfway house. The court relied in particular on the value of preserving Pool’s business and his employees’ jobs, the need for Pool to continue his significant charitable activities, and the existence of his medical problems. *See United States v. Pool,*474 F.3d 1127, 1128-29 (8th Cir.2007).

The government appealed, and this court vacated the probationary sentence as an unreasonable variance, noting that while the circumstances the district court relied on were “appropriate considerations, the court gave too much weight” to these factors, which did “not justify a variance of this magnitude,” and gave insufficient weight to other section 3553(a) factors, such as the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities. *See id.*at 1129-30.

On remand, without addressing the grounds Pool asserted in support of a variance, the district court sentenced him to 33 months in prison. The court stated only that it had “carefully considered the guidelines,” and that it had “an affirmative duty” to impose a sentence that would meet the need to promote respect for the law, protect the public, deter criminal conduct, and provide opportunities for treatment.

After careful review, we are concerned the district court’s decision to resentence Pool within the Guidelines range-without even mentioning the factors it had previously cited as grounds for a variance-may indicate that the court felt constrained to do so by the remanding opinion. The district court’s discretion was not so limited, however, as the Supreme Court subsequently made clear in *Gall v. United States,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 602, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) (explaining that an appellate court must give “due deference to the District Court’s reasoned and reasonable decision that the § 3553(a) factors, on the whole, justified the sentence,” rather than “decide *de novo*whether the justification for a variance is sufficient or the sentence reasonable”).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing in light of *Gall.*
Exhibit 35.1

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that the undersigned is the duly elected and acting Vice President, Controller, and Chief Accounting Officer of CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Securitization Property Servicing Agreement dated as of July 22, 2014 (the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Servicer and CONSUMERS 2014 SECURITIZATION FUNDING LLC, and further certifies that:

 

1.         A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2017 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement.

 

2.         To the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the year ended December 31, 2017.

 

Executed as of this 8th day of March 2018.

 
|   |                                                               | CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|   |                                                               | as Servicer               |
|   |                                                               |                      |
|   |                                                               |                      |
|   | By:                                                                | /s/ Glenn P. Barba        |
|   |                                                               | Glenn P. Barba            |
|   | Vice President, Controller, Chief   Accounting Officer, and senior |
|   | officer in charge of the servicing   function of the Servicer      |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 507 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 507

 To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 
                    higher wages to their employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2015

Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Crapo, 
Mr. Alexander, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Lee, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Scott, 
  Mr. McConnell, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Cornyn, and Mr. Risch) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 
                    higher wages to their employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rewarding Achievement and 
Incentivizing Successful Employees Act'' or the ``RAISE Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF HIGHER WAGES.

    Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 159(a)) 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) Notwithstanding a labor organization's exclusive 
representation of employees in a unit, or the terms and conditions of 
any collective bargaining contract or agreement then in effect, nothing 
in either--
            ``(A) paragraph (1) or (5) of section 8(a); or
            ``(B) a collective bargaining contract or agreement renewed 
        or entered into after the date of enactment of the RAISE Act,
shall prohibit an employer from paying an employee in the unit greater 
wages, pay, or other compensation for, or by reason of, his or her 
services as an employee of such employer, than provided for in such 
contract or agreement.''.
                                 <all>
```
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE







Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 6, 2013, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
Special Servicer, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-375P (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant
to Section 12.7 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January
1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has
been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled
all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6thday of March
2015.











Daniel
Bober

Executive
Vice President

Wells
Fargo Bank















|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | 
|---------------------- |  |
Summary of annual cash compensation of executive officers



 Exhibit 10.12 
 Annual Cash Compensation of Executive Officers 
 Base Salaries and 2008 Bonus
Payments. The executive officers of Stereotaxis, Inc. (the “Company”) have their base salaries determined yearly by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors. The executive officers are all
“at will” employees, and each have written employment agreements which are filed, as required, as exhibits to reports filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On February 18, 2009, the Compensation Committee
determined that the 2009 annual salaries for executive officers of the Company would not increase from the 2008 amounts and that payments would be made under the Company’s 2008 bonus program (the “2008 Program”) to the executive
officers of the Company as set forth below. The 2008 Program was designed to reward the accomplishments of these officers on behalf of the Company in 2008 pursuant to and consistent with the objective of the Company’s bonus plan, as determined
by the Committee. The bonus plan performance measures included operating and financial goals, including orders and revenue, expense and clinical adoption. The 2009 salaries and 2008 bonuses are summarized in the following table: 
  

							
	 	  	2009 Salary	  	2008 Bonus
	 Douglas Bruce
 Chief Technology/Operations Officer
	  	$	295,000	  	$	30,000
	 Bevil J. Hogg
 Former Chief Executive Officer (1)
	  	 	N/A	  	$	50,000
	 Michael Kaminski
 President & Chief Executive Officer (2)
	  	$	400,000	  	$	50,000
	 Louis Ruggiero
 Chief Commercial Officer
	  	$	300,000	  	$	21,452
	 James Stolze
 Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	310,000	  	$	30,000
	 Melissa Walker
 Senior Vice President, Regulatory, Quality & Compliance
	  	$	235,000	  	$	30,000

  

	(1)	 Between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008 Mr. Hogg served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hogg continues to serve as a
Director. 



	(2)	 Between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008 Mr. Kaminski served as the Company’s President & Chief Operating Officer. Effective
January 1, 2009 Mr. Kaminski was appointed to his current position as the Company’s President & Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Kaminski also serves as a Director. 


 The Company intends to provide additional information regarding other compensation awarded to the named executive officers in respect of
and during the 2008 fiscal year in the proxy statement for its 2009 annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in April 2009.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        2,719,629
<SECURITIES>                  19,833,106
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              23,079,787
<PP&E>                        1,942,151
<DEPRECIATION>                1,264,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                25,826,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,865,514
<BONDS>                       353,043
<COMMON>                      143,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    23,464,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  25,826,959
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              798,016
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,616,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            15,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,264,908)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,264,908)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.09)
        

</TABLE>