alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 151 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Safe Digging Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2015 

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Mr. BOOKER) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Safe Digging 

Month. 

Whereas each year, the underground utility infrastructure of 

the United States, including pipelines, electric, gas, telecommunications, water, sewer, and cable television lines, 

is jeopardized by unintentional damage caused by those 

who fail to have underground lines located prior to 

digging; 

Whereas some utility lines are buried only a few inches underground, making the lines easy to strike, even during 

shallow digging projects; 

Whereas digging prior to locating underground utility lines 

often results in unintended consequences, such as service 

interruption, environmental damage, personal injury, and 

even death; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 151 ATS 

Whereas the month of April marks the beginning of the peak 

period during which excavation projects are carried out 

around the United States; 

Whereas in 2002, Congress required the Department of 

Transportation and the Federal Communications Commission to establish a 3-digit, nationwide, toll-free number to be used by State ‘‘One Call’’ systems to provide 

information on underground utility lines; 

Whereas in 2005, the Federal Communications Commission 

designated ‘‘811’’ as the nationwide ‘‘One Call’’ number 

for homeowners and excavators to use to obtain information on underground utility lines before conducting excavation activities; 

Whereas ‘‘One Call’’ has helped reduce the number of digging 

damages caused by failure to call before digging from 48 

percent in 2004 to 26 percent in 2013; 

Whereas the 1,700 members of the Common Ground Alliance, who are dedicated to ensuring public safety, environmental protection, and the integrity of services, promote the national ‘‘Call Before You Dig’’ campaign to increase public awareness about the importance of homeowners and excavators calling 811 to find out the exact 

location of underground lines; 

Whereas the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job 

Creation Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–90; 125 Stat. 

1904) affirmed and expanded the ‘‘One Call’’ program by 

eliminating exemptions given to local and State government agencies and their contractors regarding notifying 

‘‘One Call’’ centers before digging; and 

Whereas the Common Ground Alliance has designated April 

as ‘‘National Safe Digging Month’’ to increase awareness 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 151 ATS 

of safe digging practices across the United States and to 

celebrate the anniversary of 811, the national ‘‘Call Before You Dig’’ number: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Safe Digging Month; and 

4 (2) encourages all homeowners and excavators 

5 throughout the United States to call 811 before 

6 digging. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No 21

- 774 1

EDWARD WITHERSPOON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. FRANK B. BISHOP; MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. ( 8:19

- cv - 00544

- TDC )

Submitted : March 24, 2022 Decided: March 29, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN , and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Edward Witherspoon , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Edward Witherspoon seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing with out prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition , pursuant to Witherspoon’s request to voluntarily
withdraw his claims so that he could exhaust his state remedies

. A Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)( 2 ) voluntary dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Unioil, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton &
Co. , 809 F.2d 548, 555 (9th Cir. 1986) (holding that a plaintiff generally may not appeal a voluntary dismissal without prejudice because it is not an involuntary adverse judgment against him), overruled in part on other grounds by In re Keegan Mgmt. Co. , 78 F.3d 431,
434

- 35 (9th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we deny Witherspoon’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-31171

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAYMOND PEGG,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:11-CR-271-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Raymond Pegg appeals his conviction for engaging in the business of

dealing in firearms without a license, arguing that the evidence was insufficient

to support his conviction. He contends the evidence indicated that he was not

engaged in the business of selling firearms, and he did not need the money from

the sale of firearms to support himself. He contends that he sold some firearms

on one occasion to purchase a vehicle for his son, but maintains that selling a

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 16, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-31171 Document: 00512409404 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/16/2013
No. 12-31171

gun collection is legal and does not constitute engaging in the business of dealing

in firearms.

A review of the evidence indicates that a rational trier of fact could have

found beyond a reasonable doubt that Pegg was engaged in the business of

dealing in firearms without a license. See United States v. Harris, 666 F.3d 905,

907 (5th Cir. 2012). The jury rejected Pegg’s testimony that he merely collected

firearms and sold them occasionally, and this court may not substitute its own

views on the credibility of witnesses for those of the jury. See United States v.

Anderson, 559 F.3d 348, 353 (5th Cir. 2009). Pegg frequently bought firearms

from the Barksdale Air Force Base Exchange and gun shows, he sold firearms

for a profit, he did not keep records on these sales, and he sometimes advertised

firearms for sale in the local newspaper. The evidence indicated that Pegg’s

prinicipal motivation for selling firearms was economic and that he made

repetitive purchases and sales of firearms. The Government was not required

to prove that Pegg’s primary business was the sale of firearms or that he sold a

specific number of firearms. For these reasons, a rational jury could have found

beyond a reasonable doubt that Pegg was engaged in the business of selling

firearms without a license. See Harris, 666 F.3d at 907.

AFFIRMED. 

2

 Case: 12-31171 Document: 00512409404 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/16/2013
Unassociated Document


 


Exhibit 10.1


 


Land Use Rights Transfer Agreement


 



	
Party A:

	
Hanzhong Guangsha Real Estate Development Ltd







 



	
Party B:

	
Shaanxi Guangsha Investment and Development Group Co., Ltd







 


Party A and Party B reached to the following agreement:


 



	
(1)

	
Party A agreed to transfer the land use right covering 66 Mu property located in the West of Mingzhu street and close to Hanzhong airport to Party B.







 



	
(2)

	
Location of the property







East Border: Close to the property owned by Party B


South Border: close to airport runway (Hanning road under municipal planning)


West border: close to 94043 location


North border: Close to North fence








	
(3)

	
Area of the property







Area is 66 Mu (equivalent to 44,000 square meters)








	
(4)

	
Transfer price







The transfer price is determined to be a fixed package price. The amount is RMB 80,000,000.








	
(5)

	
Payment method







5.1  Party B shall pay Party A RMB 60,000,000 upon signing this agreement


5.2  After the land use right is properly transferred to Party B, Party B shall pay Party A all the remaining transfer price RMB 20,000,000








	
(6)

	
Party A is responsible for any disputes resulted from transfer of land use rights, area border and other matters and shall be responsible for any cost incurred from dispute.







 



	
(7)

	
Party A agrees Party B to start the preliminary planning on the property







 



	
(8)

	
If any matter is not covered by this agreement, both parties agree to negotiate in the supplemental agreement. The supplemental agreement has same legal authority as this agreement.







 



	
(9)

	
If there is any dispute incurred during executing this agreement, both parties agree to settle it with the local arbitration organization. If the matter cannot be settled by local arbitration organization, both parties shall appeal to the court.







 



	
(10)

	
This agreement has six copies, each party shall have three copies.







 


Signed by Party A


Signed by Party B


Signed on March 16, 2011.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00548-CV

HOLLINGSWORTH-PACK CORPORATION and Christopher A. Hewitt, P.E.,

Appellants

v.

Elroy RODRIGUEZ, as Trustee of Peter R. Villarreal Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-CI10686

Honorable Nicole Garza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Irene Rios Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 17, 2023

DISMISSED

Appellants filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal because the parties have 

reached a settlement. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 235 

Designating September 2015 as ‘‘National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. NELSON) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2015 as ‘‘National Spinal Cord 

Injury Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas the estimated over 1,275,000 individuals in the 

United States who live with a spinal cord injury cost society billions of dollars in health care costs and lost wages; 

Whereas an estimated 100,000 of those individuals are veterans who suffered a spinal cord injury while serving as 

members of the United States Armed Forces; 

Whereas work-related accidents are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries; 

Whereas motor vehicle crashes are the second leading cause 

of spinal cord injuries and traumatic brain injuries; 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 235 ATS 

Whereas 70 percent of all spinal cord injuries that occur in 

children under the age of 18 are a result of a motor vehicle accident; 

Whereas every 48 minutes a person will become paralyzed, 

underscoring the urgent need to develop new 

neuroprotection, pharmacological, and regeneration treatments to reduce, prevent, and reverse paralysis; and 

Whereas increased education and investment in research are 

key factors in improving outcomes for victims of spinal 

cord injuries, improving the quality of life of victims, and 

ultimately curing paralysis: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2015 as ‘‘National 

3 Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

5 Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month; 

6 (3) continues to support research to find better 

7 treatments and therapies, and a cure for spinal cord 

8 injuries; 

9 (4) supports clinical trials for new therapies 

10 that offer promise and hope to individuals living 

11 with paralysis; and 

12 (5) commends the dedication of national, re13 gional, and local organizations, researchers, doctors, 

14 volunteers, and people across the United States that 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 235 ATS 

1 are working to improve the quality of life of people 

2 living with spinal cord injuries and their families. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1996 AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
NOVEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE TO SUCH FORM
10-Q FILING.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,291,000
<SECURITIES>                                 4,175,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,687,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   400,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,577,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,230,000
<PP&E>                                      13,276,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,142,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,430,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,407,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,828,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,430,000
<SALES>                                     12,984,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,556,000
<CGS>                                       11,365,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,866,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,606,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                50,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,078,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,192,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,886,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,886,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 132000 & (19) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132000 COA: 267435 Genesee CC: 00-007029-FC LAQUAN TREMAINE JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to remand is DENIED.

s1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5
<LEGEND>                    THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                            EXTRACTED FROM COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS COMPANY FORM
                            10-K ANNUAL  REPORT FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  DECEMBER
                            31,  1996  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
                            REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000
       
                             <S>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                  539
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       242,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                           9,671
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    279,816
<PP&E>                                            1,259,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                      676,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      908,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               171,159
<BONDS>                                             229,373
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             27,561
<OTHER-SE>                                          389,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        908,922
<SALES>                                             412,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    425,464
<CGS>                                                80,231
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       283,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   18,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     123,363
<INCOME-TAX>                                         41,305
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  82,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (6,301)
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         75,757
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        

</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 21, 2010 

# Order

September 21, 2010

137451 (87)

MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 137451 v COA: 280792 Ingham CC: 06-001537-AA SECRETARY OF STATE, Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ___________________

On order of the Chief Jus tice, the motion by defendant appellee for extension to September 17, 2010 of the tim e for filing its brief on appeal is considered and it is

GRANTED.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Terry C. Black, Chief Financial Officer, DATATRAK International, Inc.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DATATRAKInternational, Inc. (the “registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004    /s/ Terry C. Black  Terry C. Black, Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
Termination Notice of the Power of Attorney







[        ] (ID Card No. :[           ]) authorized [      ] (ID Card No. :[                  ]) designated by Detian Yu Biotechnology(Beijing) Co. Limited  (德天御生态科技(北京)有限公司) (hereinafter referred to as “Trustee”) to solely exercise all the voting rights as shareholder of [Jinzhonglongyue Investment Consulting Service Co., Ltd. (晋中龙跃投资咨询服务有限公司) (hereinafter referred to as “Jinzhonglongyue”)][Beijing Jundaqianyuan Investment Management Co., Ltd. ( 北京君大乾元投资管理有限公司) (hereinafter referred to as “Jundaqianyuan”)], including but not limited to recommending and electing directors, general manager and other senior management officers at the shareholders’ meeting of [Jinzhonglongyue][Jundaqianyuan] as the authorized representative of [           ] within 10 years after the issuance of the said Power of Attorney on November 16, 2010.







[     ] hereby withdraws the abovementioned appointment and authorization and the Power of Attorney shall be terminated as of the date of this withdrawal. Upon termination, all actions conducted by Trustee in the name of authorized representative of shareholder of [Jinzhonglongyue][Jundaqianyuan], if any, shall bear no relation to [                ] who will not be responsible for such conducts.







[            ] has been informed of and consented to such withdrawal of appointment and authorization.








[                  ] (signature):










[                 ] (signature):





 





Date:  December 20, 2011


 




  





1