alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 113 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 113

 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Citizens' Stamp Advisory 
   Committee should recommend the issuance of, and the United States 
  Postal Service should issue, a commemorative stamp in honor of the 
                           holiday of Diwali.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2015

    Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Cornyn) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Citizens' Stamp Advisory 
   Committee should recommend the issuance of, and the United States 
  Postal Service should issue, a commemorative stamp in honor of the 
                           holiday of Diwali.

Whereas Diwali, also referred to as the ``festival of lights'', is an Indian 
        holiday that marks the beginning of the Hindu New Year;
Whereas Diwali celebrates the triumph of good over evil, the awareness of one's 
        inner light, the dispelling of ignorance, and bringing peace and joy 
        through the awakening gained from a higher knowledge;
Whereas Diwali is observed in the United States, and across the globe, by 
        Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Jains, and Buddhists;
Whereas as one of the world's oldest religious holidays, Diwali serves not only 
        as a time for celebration, but also as a time for communities and 
        families to come together in spiritual enlightenment;
Whereas the practice of celebrating Diwali has survived political, economic, and 
        social changes throughout history, while always carrying the universal 
        symbolism of the victory of light, goodness, knowledge, and truth;
Whereas the United States Postal Service, in accordance with recommendations of 
        the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee, has issued stamps for other 
        popular holidays in the United States, including Christmas, Kwanzaa, 
        Hanukkah, and Eid al-Fitr;
Whereas the United States Postal Service has yet to issue a stamp in honor of 
        Diwali; and
Whereas issuing a postage stamp honoring Diwali is fitting and proper: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service should issue a postage 
        stamp honoring the holiday of Diwali; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 131 

Designating April 5, 2015, as ‘‘Gold Star Wives Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27 (legislative day, MARCH 26), 2015 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mrs. BOXER) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

APRIL 13, 2015 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 5, 2015, as ‘‘Gold Star Wives Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate honors the sacrifices made by the 

spouses and families of the fallen members of the Armed 

Forces of the United States; 

Whereas Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. represents the 

spouses and families of the members and veterans of the 

Armed Forces of the United States who have died on active duty or as a result of a service-connected disability; 

Whereas the primary mission of Gold Star Wives of America, 

Inc. is to provide services, support, and friendship to the 

spouses of the fallen members and veterans of the Armed 

Forces of the United States; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 131 ATS 

Whereas in 1945, Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. was organized with the help of Eleanor Roosevelt to assist the 

families left behind by the fallen members and veterans 

of the Armed Forces of the United States; 

Whereas the first meeting of Gold Star Wives of America, 

Inc. was held on April 5, 1945; 

Whereas April 5, 2015, marks the 70th anniversary of the 

first meeting of Gold Star Wives of America, Inc.; 

Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces of 

the United States bear the burden of protecting the freedom of the people of the United States; and 

Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members 

and veterans of the Armed Forces of the United States 

should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 5, 2015, as ‘‘Gold Star 

3 Wives Day’’; 

4 (2) honors and recognizes— 

5 (A) the contributions of the members of 

6 Gold Star Wives of America, Inc.; and 

7 (B) the dedication of the members of Gold 

8 Star Wives of America, Inc. to the members 

9 and veterans of the Armed Forces of the United 

10 States; and 

11 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

12 to observe Gold Star Wives Day to promote aware13 ness of— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 131 ATS 

1 (A) the contributions and dedication of the 

2 members of Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. 

3 to the members and veterans of the Armed 

4 Forces of the United States; and 

5 (B) the important role that Gold Star 

6 Wives of America, Inc. plays in the lives of the 

7 spouses and families of the fallen members and 

8 veterans of the Armed Forces of the United 

9 States. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 35.1

EXHIBIT 35.1  ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and
Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (the Sale and Servicing Agreement) among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2013-2, as Issuer (the Issuer), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, CarMax Business Services, LLC, as
Servicer (the Servicer), and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Backup Servicer, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2014 and ending on February 28, 2015 and of the Servicers performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made
under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing
Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officers
Certificate this 22nd day of May, 2015.



CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC/s/ Thomas W. ReedyThomas W. ReedyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.20

 

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT

 

THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the 12th day of May, 2010, by and among Roundy’s Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Roundy’s Supermarkets, Inc. (f/k/a/ “Roundy’s, Inc.”), a Wisconsin corporation (“Roundy’s”) and Darren W. Karst (“Executive”).

 

The Company, Roundy’s and Executive are parties to an “Executive Agreement” dated as of June 6, 2002, and amended as of February 21, 2007, June 5, 2008 and March 25, 2009 (collectively, as amended, the “Original Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, Executive has acquired certain shares of the capital stock of the Company and is employed by Roundy’s.  The parties wish to amend the Original Agreement pursuant to the terms herein.

 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree that Section 13(a) of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to change the word “eighth” as it appears in that section to “ninth.”  In all other respects the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its original terms.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Fourth Amendment, as of the date first written above.

 

 

	
ROUNDY’S ACQUISITION CORP.
    	
 
    	
ROUNDY’S   SUPERMARKETS, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   John R. Willis
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Edward G. Kitz
    
	
 
    	
John   R. Willis, Vice President & Sec’y
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Edward   G. Kitz, Group V. P. - Legal, Risk & Treasury
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
EXECUTIVE:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/   Darren W. Karst
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Darren   W. Karst
    


 

By their signatures below, the undersigned “Investors” (as that term is defined in the Original Agreement), collectively holding a majority of the common and preferred stock of the Company, hereby consent to and approve the foregoing Fourth Amendment to Executive Agreement.

 

	
WILLIS STEIN & PARTNERS   III, L.P.
    	
 
    	
WILLIS   STEIN & PARTNERS DUTCH III-A, L.P.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Avy H. Stein
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Avy H. Stein
    
	
 
    	
Avy   H. Stein, Manager
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Avy   H. Stein, Manager
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
WILLIS STEIN & PARTNERS   DUTCH III-B, L.P.
    	
 
    	
WILLIS   STEIN & PARTNERS III-C, L.P.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Avy H. Stein
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Avy H. Stein
    
	
 
    	
Avy   H. Stein, Manager
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Avy   H. Stein, Manager
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6295

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALVIN JUSTIN HUGGINS, a/k/a Buddy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CR-95-51-H, CA-01-70-4-H)

Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Alan Williams, KEITH A. WILLIAMS, P.A., Greenville, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United

States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Justin Huggins seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Huggins, Nos. CR95-51-H; CA-01-70-4-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




Compensation Arrangements with Outside Directors




In September 2011, the Board of Directors and its Compensation Committee conducted their
annual review of non-management (outside) director compensation and approved no change in the
quarterly retainer, meeting fees or committee chairperson fees. Accordingly, outside directors
continue to be paid:




	 	•	a quarterly retainer of $20,000;
	 
	 	•	$2,000 for each in-person Board meeting attended; and
	 
	 	•	$2,000 for each in-person committee meeting attended.





Directors who attend a Board or committee meeting telephonically are paid 75% of the applicable
in-person meeting fee.



Chairpersons of the Compensation, Nominating & Governance and Information Technology Oversight
Committees are paid an additional annual fee of $13,500. The Audit Committee chairperson is paid
an additional annual fee of $22,500. In addition, each outside director who was elected at FedEx’s
2011 annual meeting received a stock option for 5,970 shares of FedEx common stock. Likewise,
anyone else who is elected to the Board as an outside director before the 2012 annual meeting will
receive a stock option for 5,970 shares of FedEx common stock in connection with his or her
election.
S. Con. Res. 50 Agreed to July 25, 2016

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That, in consonance with section 132(a) of the Legislative 

Reorganization Act of 1946, when the House adjourns on any legislative day from Friday, July 15, 2016, through Friday, September 

2, 2016, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution 

by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 

2 p.m. on Tuesday, September 6, 2016, or until the time of any 

reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 

whichever occurs first. 

SEC. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after consultation 

with the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members 

of the House to reassemble at such place and time as he may 

designate if, in his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it. 

(b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the 

House adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection 

by its Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again 

stand adjourned pursuant to the first section of this concurrent 

resolution. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00009

- CV

FREDRICK

- MARSHAL VAN HORN

, Appellant

v.

STATE OF TEXAS/ELLIS COUNTY

, Appellee

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 97022

ORDER

The relief requested in the document filed on February 1 4 , 2018 titled “ Peoples

Response to The Tenth Court of Appeals & Trial Court Fraud, the Gov’ & its counsel’

many corrupt, fraudulent, & downright criminal acts etc. ” is Denied. 1

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion Denied

Order issued and filed February 28 , 2018

1 The document might be considered a motion for rehearing but is not titled as such.
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 122 

Amending rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate to limit debate 

on motions to proceed. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. UDALL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Amending rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate 

to limit debate on motions to proceed. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. LIMITING DEBATE ON MOTIONS TO PROCEED 

3 UNDER RULE XXII. 

4 Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate is 

5 amended by— 

6 (1) redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as 

7 paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

8 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol9 lowing: 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 122 IS 

1 ‘‘2. Other than a motion made during the first 

2 2 hours of a new legislative day, as described in 

3 paragraph 2 of rule VIII, consideration of a motion 

4 to proceed to the consideration of any debatable 

5 matter, including consideration of any debatable mo6 tion or appeal in connection therewith, shall be lim7 ited to not more than 2 hours, to be divided equally 

8 between the majority and the minority. This para9 graph shall not apply to motions considered non10 debatable by the Senate pursuant to rule or prece11 dent.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

OP 22-0518 

ROBERT A. BENNETT, JR., 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JASON VALDEZ, 

Respondent. 

OCT 0 4 2022 

Bowen c..1reenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER ' 

Robert A. Bennett, Jr. petitions this Court for habeas corpus relief, indicating illegal 

incarceration because he did not receive discovery of materials in his two pending criminal 

cases after asking his counsel and the prosecuting attorney for such delivery. He asserts 

that his right to a speedy trial and right to due process have both been violated. Bennett 

requests his immediate release from the Yellowstone County Detention Center and 

dismissal of the criminal cases. 

We requested and reviewed the register of actions for Bennett's pending case. On 

May 7, 2021, the Yellowstone County District Court granted leave to the State to file its 

information and issued an arrest warrant with a $50,000 bond. Bennett was arrested in 

Gallatin County. The court arraigned him in July 2021. On January 3, 2022, the court 

issued an order, committing Bennett to the State Hospital for examination, and since then, 

it has held several trial status hearings. In June 2022, the court issued an order extending 

Bennett's commitment. Within the last month, the court has reset the jury trial twice. 

Bennett is not entitled to release or dismissal of his cases in the District Court. 

Habeas corpus is not the remedy for Bennett's discovery request claim. Habeas corpus is 

not the remedy for alleged constitutional violations, such as speedy trial and due process. 

Gates v. Missoula Cnty. Comm'rs, 235 Mont. 261, 262, 766 P.2d 884, 884-85 (1988). His 

remedy would be an appeal of a final sentencing judgment. Section 46-20-104(1), MCA. 

10/04/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0518
Bennett has not demonstrated that he is illegally incarcerated. Section 46-22-

101(1), MCA. 

Bennett should refrain from filing pleadings on his own behalf with this Court while 

he is represented by counsel in the District Court. M. R. App. P. 10(1)(c). Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Bennett's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED 

and DISMISSED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to: Terry Halpin, Clerk of 

District Court, under Cause No. DC 21-629, for distribution of copies to the presiding 

District Court Judge and counsel of record there; counsel of record, and Robert A. Bennett, 

Jr. personally. 

DATED this 24) day of October, 2022. 

2
### NUMBER 13

- 17

- 00 642

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E SCRAP METAL SERVICES, LLC; SMS ALL STAR HOLDINGS, LLC; ALL STAR METALS, LLC; JEFRY K. GERTLER; RICHARD A. GERTLER; AND NIKHIL SHAH

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria

Per Curiam Order

Relator s Scrap Metal Services, LLC; SMS All Star Holdings, LLC; All Star Metals,

LLC; Jefry K. Gertler; Richard A. Gertler , and Nikhil Shah f iled a petition for writ of

mandamus and motion for emergency stay in the above cause on November 20, 2017

. Through this original pro ceeding, relator s seek to vacate o rders : (1) denying r elators’

t hird a mended m otion to abate; (2) denying r elators’ t hird a mended m otion to d ismiss for

l ack of s ubject m atter jurisdiction; (3) denying in part r elators’ s pecial e xceptions to

p laintiff’s s econd a mended p etition ; and (4) denying r elators’ s econd a mended m otion to2

j udicially n otice and a pp ly the l aw of M exico . Through their motion for emergency stay,

relators seek to stay all proceedings in the trial court including the trial of this matter which

is set for December 4, 2017.

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Sustainable Products Services

LLC, file (1) a response to the motion for emergency stay, and (2) a response to the

petition for writ of mandamus. Both responses should be filed with this Court before 5:00

p.m. on Tuesday, November 28, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 20th day of November , 201 7

.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Biotechnology Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Bruce D. Given, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ BRUCE D. GIVEN, M.D.
--------------------------------------
Bruce D. Given, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2002