alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 138 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 138

Congratulating the Providence College Men's Ice Hockey team for winning 
            the 2015 NCAA Division I National Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2015

   Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Whitehouse) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the Providence College Men's Ice Hockey team for winning 
            the 2015 NCAA Division I National Championship.

Whereas on Saturday, April 11, 2015, the Providence College Friars won the 2015 
        NCAA Division I Men's Ice Hockey National Championship by defeating the 
        Boston University Terriers by a score of 4 to 3 at TD Garden in Boston, 
        Massachusetts;
Whereas numbers 16, 10, and 6 scored the first three goals for the Friars to 
        keep the game close;
Whereas the extraordinary goal by number 22 in the third period put Providence 
        College in the lead for good;
Whereas the superb goaltending of number 32 held back Boston University's 
        scoring attacks and sealed the victory for the Friars, earning him Most 
        Outstanding Player honors of the NCAA Division I Men's Ice Hockey 
        Tournament;
Whereas the season-long contributions and dedication of all players and coaches 
        of the Friars' hockey team contributed to this National Championship 
        season;
Whereas this is the first NCAA Championship for the Providence College Men's Ice 
        Hockey team;
Whereas the Providence College Friars finished the season with 26 wins and 
        outscored its opponents 19 to 10 in the NCAA Division I Men's Ice Hockey 
        Tournament; and
Whereas the Providence College Men's Ice Hockey team became the latest Rhode 
        Island college team to win a National Championship and earn the pride of 
        the State: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates the Providence College Men's Ice Hockey 
        team for winning the 2015 NCAA Division I National 
        Championship;
            (2) commends the players, coaches, and staff of the 
        Providence College Men's Ice Hockey team for their hard work 
        and dedication in making this the most successful season in 
        team history; and
            (3) recognizes the Providence College students, alumni, and 
        fans who supported the Men's Ice Hockey team in its pursuit of 
        a National Championship.
                                 <all>
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

d0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140923

HURON CHARTER TOWNSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140923 COA: 289734 Wayne CC: 07-721662-CE LANNY DESMOND FOX, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 2, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.64

                        [TEXAS BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERHEAD]

June 23, 1998



Dr. Philip Jochelson
12525 Maestro Court
San Diego, CA 92130

Dear Philip:

This letter will formally confirm your verbal acceptance of the offer extended
to you on behalf of Texas Biotechnology Corporation. By signing this letter,
you will be indicating your acceptance of the position of Vice President,
Clinical Development and Regulatory Affairs, reporting to the CEO, David
McWilliams. It is anticipated that you will start no later than August 3, 1998.

Your compensation package will include:

     o    A base salary of $200,000

     o    A sign-on bonus of $20,000

     o    Eligibility for an annual bonus that will be targeted at 25% of your
          base salary. The bonus will be paid out 50% in cash and 50% in
          restricted stock options.

     o    An initial stock option award of 50,000 shares. You will also be
          eligible for an annual award targeted at 50,000 shares.

     o    Reimbursement for reasonable relocation costs, including house hunting
          trips, realtor's fees, transportation of household goods and temporary
          housing.

     o    Participation in TBC's benefits program and four weeks vacation.

Philip, I look forward to your joining the team and years of valued
contribution to the success of the Company.

Warm Regards,

/s/ DAVID B. MCWILLIAMS

David B. McWilliams
President and Chief Executive Officer

DBM/kdm

Agreed and accepted this 25th day of June, 1998.

/s/ PHILIP JOCHELSON
-------------------------------------------------
Philip Jochelson, M.D.
EXHIBIT 32.1
           Section 1350 Certification -- Principal Executive Officer

                 Citizens Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

                In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citizens
Financial  Corporation (the  "Company")for  the quarterly period ended March 31,
2004, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report") I,  Darrell R. Wells,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18  U.S.C. s.s. 1350, as adopted pursuant to s.s. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.       The  Report fully  complies with  the requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained in  the  Report  fairly   presents,  in all
material  respects, the financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
Company.


                                 By:       /s/ Darrel R. Wells
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Darrell R. Wells
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 14, 2004
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a) on or before October 30, 2017.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division (“Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on June 12, 2017, Cody Laboratories, Inc., Steve Hartman, VP Compliance, 601 Yellowstone Avenue, Cody, Wyoming 82414 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer the following basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleDihydromorphine
9145
IAmphetamine
1100
IIMethamphetamine
1105
IILisdexamfetamine
1205
IIMethylphenidate
1724
IIAmobarbital
2125
IIPentobarbital
2270
IISecobarbital
2315
II4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (ANPP)
8333
IICocaine
9041
IICodeine
9050
IIDihydrocodeine
9120
IIOxycodone
9143
IIHydromorphone
9150
IIDiphenoxylate
9170
IIEcgonine
9180
IIHydrocodone
9193
IIMeperidine
9230
IIMethadone
9250
IIMethadone intermediate
9254
IIMorphine
9300
IIThebaine
9333
IIOxymorphone
9652
IIAlfentanil
9737
IIRemifentanil
9739
IISufentanil
9740
IITapentadol
9780
IIFentanyl
9801
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. Dated: August 21, 2017. Demetra Ashley, Acting Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2017-18316 Filed 8-28-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Gilberto GONZALO-DIAZ a/k/a Pedro, Maria T. Guerra, Clara I. Guerra, Maria Diaz, a/k/a Maria Diaz Castellano, Defendants.

No. 85-CR-201.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

July 24, 1985.

Joseph T. Urbaniak, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for plaintiff.

*358Arthur M. Schwartz, Irvin Bornstein, Denver, Colo., for Gilberto Gonzalo-Diaz.

Steven Polidori, Denver, Colo., for Maria T. Guerra.

Bruce Fierst, Denver, Colo., for Clara I. Guerra.

Amanda Maxwell, South Miami, Fla. and Michael Gross, Denver, Colo., for Maria Diaz.

Allan Lenefsky, Wheatridge, Colo., and Louis Casuso, Miami, Fla., for Socorro Guerra.

ORDER and NOTICE TO COUNSEL OF RECORD

KANE, District Judge.

The court has examined the surfeit of motions and briefs filed by counsel for the several defendants in this case. A hearing is set on all pending motions commencing Friday, August 2, 1985. Most of the motions appear to be needless. The memoranda in support of these motions do not meet the standards of practice expected from members of the bar of this court. Citations to cases in other circuits are of no use to this court. Counsels’ attention is directed to Local Rule of Practice 408. This court is interested in the law as specifically set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and the District of Colorado. This court is entirely too busy to chase down string citations or read canned briefs. Counsel are advised that sanctions will be imposed under Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P. and 28 U. S.C. § 1927 where the circumstances warrant.

The court suggests that defense counsel meet with the U.S. Attorney immediately and advise the court of which motions actually require argument and consideration by the court. The court further suggests that the memoranda heretofore filed be withdrawn and substantially revised.

Defendants have filed a motion for enlargement of time to file additional pre-trial motions. In keeping with the foregoing notice,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for enlargement of time is granted. Defendants may file motions up to and including Wednesday, July 31, 1985.
Exhibit 33.2



|     |                      |               
|---- | -------------------- | --------------
|LOGO |                      | 1 Mortgage Way
|     | Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB

SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage
Corporation (the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing
criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR), except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has
concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report (the Applicable Servicing Criteria). The criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii),
(d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(vii), (d)(4)(viii) and (d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are performed by outsource providers on behalf of the Asserting Party; however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of these criteria and assumes responsibility for
compliance. The transactions covered by this report include all non-agency loan sale agreements executed after January 1, 2006 as well as all re-securitization transactions after January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting Party served as
servicer (the Platform).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the
Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

PHH Mortgage Corporation

Date: February 26, 2016



|                   
|-------------------
|/s/ Glen A. Messina
|Glen A. Messina    
|President          



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Martin L. Foster                  
|Martin L. Foster                      
|Senior Vice President  Loan Servicing
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00025-CV

FE EXPRESS, LLC and Francisco Javier Bernal, 

Appellants

v.

Maria Isabel Serna CONTRERAS, as next friend and guardian of Samara Isabella Morales 

Serna and Samantha Isabel Morales Serna, minor children, and as Administrator of the Estate of 

Samuel Morales Castillo, Deceased,

Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2014CVT001295 D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

VACATED without regard to the merits and this case is REMANDED to the trial court with 

instructions to vacate the trial court’s July 17, 2017 Order Setting Amount of Security for Money 

Judgment and to release FE Express and its surety from the Supersedeas Bond filed on February 

3, 2017. Costs of this appeal are assessed against appellants.

SIGNED January 17, 2018.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF DANVILLE

#### Commonwealth of Virginia v. Rudolph Demond Luck

May 23, 2002

Case No. 02-83

By Judge Joseph W. Milam, Jr.

Having reviewed the authorities submitted by counsel regarding the Defendant’s motion to suppress in the above-styled case, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted on the basis that the Defendant did not receive the warnings required by *Miranda v.*Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

Pursuant to *Mathis v. United*Stales, 391 U.S. 1 (1968), as both counsel acknowledge, *Miranda*warnings must be given prior to custodial interrogations in prison regardless of whether the person in custody is so situated for the matter of the interrogation. However, as subsequent case law makes clear, *Mathis*does not impose a *per se*rule that any investigative questioning of a suspect prisoner requires *Miranda*warnings. *Blain*v. *Commonwealth, 1*Va. App. 10, 371 S.E.2d 838 (1998); *United States*v. *Conley,*779 F.2d 970 (4th Cir. 1985). *See also Cervantes v. Walker,*589 F.2d 424 (9th Cir. 1978). Nevertheless, the facts in this case present no significant distinguishing circumstances that would lead to an outcome different from that contemplated under *Mathis.*

Unlike the facts in *Cervantes,*in this case, the questions presented to the Defendant were not in furtherance of an on-the-scene investigation of a possible crime in progress. Neither was a spontaneous reaction elicited from a routine, prison related search. *Id.*427. Likewise, in determining whether the Defendant was “in custody” for purposes of *Miranda,*this case is not comparable to *Conley*in that the Defendant here was taken to an office primarily for the purpose of interrogation. *See Conley,*779 F.2d at 973 (where *499inmate was taken to conference area primarily to await medical treatment when incriminating statements were made). Nor with *Blain*are the circumstances here similar in that the incriminating statements in that case also arose from a routine prison search, whereby the prisoner was removed from his cell for a purpose other than interrogation. *Id.*15. To the contrary, the Defendant in this case, as in Mathis, was questioned “by a government agent, not himself a member of the prison staff, on a matter not under investigation within the prison itself.” *Cervantes,*589 F.2d at 428. In summary, the significant facts in this case resemble far more those in *Mathis*where the prisoner was in fact interrogated by a government agent on an extrinsic matter while in custody and thereby entitled to first receive the *Miranda*warnings.

For these reasons, the motion to suppress is granted and the charge against the Defendant will be dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         19,840
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               28,535
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    348,726
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        355,683
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 813,902
<DEPOSITS>                                     720,741
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            20,280
<LONG-TERM>                                    280
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    6
<COMMON>                                       30
<OTHER-SE>                                     72,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 813,902
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                14,287
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              12,066
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               870
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               27,223
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             14,899
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,915
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          12,308
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  575
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             94
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                10,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,375
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3,375
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.33
<LOANS-NON>                                    3,471
<LOANS-PAST>                                   608
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               2,916
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                1,960
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               469
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  172
<RECOVERIES>                                   2,238
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        2,238
        


</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 (Submitted April 21, 2006)

Decided April 26, 2006

Before Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge
Nos. 99-3076, 99-3336, 99-3891, 99-3892, and 01-2050 NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, INC., et al. , Plaintiffs-Appellees ,
v. JOSEPH M. SCHEIDLER, et al ., Defendants-Appellants

. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

O R D E R Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s opinion in Scheidler et al. v. National Organization for Women, et al. , 126 S. Ct. 1264 (2006), with respect to Nos. 99-3076, 99-3336, 99-3891, and 99- 3892, the judgment of the district court in this case is REVERSED , the injunction ordered by that court is V ACATED , and the case is hereby REMANDED to the district court for entry of judgment in favor of the defendants-appellants. We D ISMISS appeal No. 01-2050 as moot. UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53