alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex4_1.htm


Exhibit 4.1


 





 




  





  











  






 


The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:


 


 



	
TEN COM - as tenants in common


TEN ENT  - as tenants by the entireties


JT TEN- as joint tenants with right of


 survivorship and not as tenants


 in common

	
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -  .............Custodian................


  (Cust)         (Minor)


under Uniform Gifts to Minors


Act ......................................


                (State)


	  	  





 


Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


 


 


For Value Received, _____________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


 


 


 



	
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER


IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

	  
	
  


 

	  





 


 


 











(PLEASE  PRINT  OR  TYPE  NAME  AND  ADDRESS,  INCLUDING  ZIP  CODE,  OF  ASSIGNEE)


 



 











 


 











 


 













Shares of the stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


 



 













Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


 



	
Dated 

	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE face


OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.







 


 


 



	
THE SIGNATURE TO THE ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND TO THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE face OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER, AND MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A COMMERCIAL BANK OR TRUST COMPANY OR A MEMBER FIRM OF A NATIONAL OR REGIONAL OR OTHER RECOGNIZED STOCK EXCHANGE IN CONFORMANCE WITH A  SIGNATURE  GUARANTEE  MEDALLION  PROGRAM.


	  

 COLUMBIA FINANCIAL PRINTING CORP.  - www.stockinformation.com
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 21, 2010 

Order 

 

September 21, 2010 

137451 (87) 

MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC: 137451 

v COA: 280792 

Ingham CC: 06-001537-AA 

SECRETARY OF STATE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

______________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant appellee for extension to 

September 17, 2010 of the time for filing its brief on appeal is considered and it is 

GRANTED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-566
In Re: ROBERT LEE HOOD, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-97-83-1-MU) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Hood, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Petitioner filed this petition for a writ of mandamus seekingto have this court direct the district court to act on his complaint. We find no unreasonable delay. Therefore, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition without prejudice to Petitioner’s right to refile the petition. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60597

Summary Calendar

ELEONORA PONCE GARCIA; ORIANA N. HERNANDEZ PONCE,

Petitioners, 

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A97 186 886

BIA No. A97 186 887

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eleonora Ponce Garcia and her minor child Oriana N.

Hernandez Ponce, who are natives and citizens of Venezuela,

petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) dismissing their appeal of the immigration judge’s

(IJ) decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding

of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture

(CAT).
No. 05-60597

-2-

Ponce Garcia has abandoned the issue that the IJ erroneously

determined that she suffered no past persecution by failing to

provide any argument to support her assertion. See Rodriguez v.

INS, 9 F.3d 408, 414 n.15 (5th Cir. 1993).

Ponce Garcia also asserts that the IJ erred in denying her

asylum application on the basis that she had not established a

well-grounded fear of future persecution. Given that Ponce

Garcia’s immediate supervisors at her previous job with the

general directorate of education in the Venezuelan state of

Miranda also spoke out against the government of Hugo Chavez and

have remained unharmed and employed in their prominent state

positions, Ponce Garcia has not shown that she possesses a wellgrounded fear of future persecution. See Guevara-Flores v. INS,

786 F.2d 1242, 1249 (5th Cir. 1986). 

We uphold the BIA’s determination that Ponce Garcia failed

to carry her burden of establishing her eligibility for asylum as

it is supported by substantial evidence. See Ontunez-Tursios v.

Ashcroft, 303 F.3d 341, 350-51 (5th Cir. 2002). Because Ponce

Garcia does not specifically the challenge the denial of relief

insofar as she sought withholding of removal or relief under the

CAT, such claims are deemed abandoned. See Rodriguez, 9 F.3d at

414 n.15. 

The petition for review is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JOHN
NUVEEN COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          18,182
<SECURITIES>                                    29,357
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,519
<PP&E>                                          57,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                (32,939)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 542,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,177
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           45,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           387
<OTHER-SE>                                     395,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   542,485
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               276,556
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               143,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,117
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             78,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    78,875
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.33


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 173 (Friday, September 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19059]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9035-1]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www2.epa.gov/ nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 08/28/2017 Through 09/01/2017
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20170172, Draft, FRA, VA, Southeast High Speed Rail Washington, 
DC to Richmond, VA, Comment Period Ends: 11/07/2017, Contact: John 
Winkle 202-493-6067.
EIS No. 20170173, Final Supplement, BLM, USFS, CO, Federal Coal Lease 
Modifications COC-1362 and COC-67232, Review Period Ends: 10/08/2017, 
Contact: Niccole Mortenson 406-329-3163.
EIS No. 20170174, Final, USFS, CO, La Garita Hills Restoration Project, 
Review Period Ends: 10/08/2017, Contact: Diana McGinn 719-852-6241.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20170078, Draft, USFWS, NE., Issuance of an Incidental Take 
Permit and Implementation of a Habitat Conservation Plan for the R-
Project Transmission Line, Comment Period Ends: 11/07/2017, Contact: 
Eliza Hines 308-382-6468 ext. 204. Revision to FR Notice Published 05/
12/2017; The USFWS has reopened the Comment Period to end 11/07/2017.

    Dated: September 5, 2017.
Kelly Knight,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2017-19059 Filed 9-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 9, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00652

- CV

Ru ben RIOS,

Appellant

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017W0521

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

T he court report er has filed a notification of late record stating that the appellant h a s failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter’ s fee for preparing the record. It is

therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten days of the

date of this order that: either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made

to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of January, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 4591** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ARKADIO DEANGEL OLIVAR E S

- LOPEZ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. James C. Dever III , Chief District Judge. ( 7:12

- cr - 00001

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : March 8, 2013 Decided: April 17, 2013

Before KING, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorney s , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Arkadio Deangel Olivares

- Lopez pled guilty to possessing with int ent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§ 841(a)(1) ( 2006 ) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 ( 2006 ). The district court sentenced him to 162 months of imprisonment. On appeal, Olivares

- Lopez contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. We review a sentence for reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion standard. Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United States v. Layton , 564 F.3d 330, 33 5 (4th Cir. 2009). In so doing, we first examine the sentence for significant procedural error, including failing to calculate (or improperly calculating) the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range, treating the Guidelines as mandatory, failing to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors, selecting a sentence based on clearly erroneous facts, or failing to adequately explain the chosen sentence. Gall , 552 U.S. at 51. When considering the substantive reasonableness of the sentence, we tak e into accou nt the totality of the circumstances. United States v. Mendoza

– Mendoza , 597 F.3d 212, 216 (4th Cir. 2010). If the sentence is within the Guidelines range, we presume on appeal that the sentence is reasonable. United States v. Go , 517 F.3d 216, 218 (4th Cir. 2008); see Rita v. United States ,3 551 U.S. 338, 346

– 56 (2007) (permitting appellate presumption of reasonableness for within

- Guidelines sentence). Here, Olivares

- Lopez was sentenced to a properly calculated advisory Guidelines range sentence. The d istrict court listened to the arguments of counsel and to Olivares

- Lopez himself, and expressly considered the § 3553(a) factors. The court adequately explained its decision to sentence Olivares

Lopez within his advisory sentencing range of 135

- 168 months , and we find no reason not to apply the presumption of reasonableness on appeal. See Go , 517 F.3d at 218. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42678-42679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC17-270-000]


Pike County Light and Power Company; Notice of Request for Waiver

    Take notice that on September 1, 2017, Pike County Light and Power 
Company filed a request for waiver of requirements to file FERC Form 
No. 1-F and 3-Q, as required by 18 CFR 141.2 and 18 CFR 141.400.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the

[[Page 42679]]

eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file 
electronically should submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or 
intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#561013041519383a3f383305232626392422163033243578313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="296f6c7b6a66474540474c7a5c5959465b5d694f4c5b4a074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comments: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September 22, 2017.

    Dated: September 1, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19142 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 97-60075 

Summary Calendar

__________________

MESAID AL-ENAZI,

 Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

 Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A 70 627 693 

- - - - - - - - - - -

November 19, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mesaid Al-Enazi appeals the decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals denying his application for asylum and

withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the record and the

briefs of the parties and find that the Board’s decision is

supported by substantial evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS,

78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). Al-Enazi’s case is not

factually distinguishable from this court’s decision in Faddoul 
No. 97-60075

-2-

v. INS, 37 F.3d 185 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the petition

for review is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 132 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 132

 Designating the week of April 5 through April 11, 2015, as ``National 
               Association of Junior Auxiliaries Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 27 (legislative day, March 26), 2015

   Mr. Wicker (for himself and Mr. Cochran) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating the week of April 5 through April 11, 2015, as ``National 
               Association of Junior Auxiliaries Week''.

Whereas the National Association of Junior Auxiliaries and the members of the 
        National Association of Junior Auxiliaries provide valuable service and 
        leadership opportunities for women who wish to take an active role in 
        their communities;
Whereas the mission of the National Association of Junior Auxiliaries is to 
        encourage member chapters to render charitable services that--

    (1) are beneficial to the general public; and

    (2) place a particular emphasis on providing for the needs of children; 
and

Whereas since the founding of the National Association of Junior Auxiliaries in 
        1941, the organization has provided strength and inspiration to women 
        who want to effect positive change in their communities: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of April 5 through April 11, 2015, 
        as ``National Association of Junior Auxiliaries Week'';
            (2) recognizes the great contributions made by members of 
        the National Association of Junior Auxiliaries to their 
        communities and to the people of the United States; and
            (3) especially commends the work of the members of the 
        National Association of Junior Auxiliaries to better the lives 
        of children in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 26, 2014

s1119

Order 

Clerk

November 26, 2014

150142

_________________________________________

In re ARS, Minor.

_________________________________________

PHILLIP SCHNEBELT and PAMELA

SCHNEBELT,

Petitioners-Appellants,

v SC: 150142

COA: 318638

Shiawassee CC Family Division:

13-003727-AF

DEREK MUSALL,

Respondent-Appellee,

and 

KAYLEIGH MARIE SCHNEBELT,

Respondent-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, 

addressing: (1) whether the respondent father demonstrated adequate “good cause” under 

Section 25 of the Adoption Code, MCL 710.25(2), for the adjournment of the adoption 

proceeding, see In re MKK, 286 Mich App 546 (2009); (2) whether the respondent 

adequately demonstrated that he had “provided substantial and regular support or care in 

accordance with [his] ability to provide such support or care for the mother during 

pregnancy or for either mother or child after the child’s birth during the 90 days before 

notice of the hearing was served upon him,” MCL 710.39(2); and (3) whether the trial 

court gave adequate consideration to the legislative mandate that all adoption proceedings 

“be considered to have the highest priority . . . .” MCL 710.25(1).
Form of Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 December 15, 2011                     
 Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. 
 2710 Wycliff Road 

Raleigh, NC 27607-3033 
 By this
letter agreement I hereby waive any right to receive any (1) compensation or benefits to which I would be entitled under my Employment Protection Agreement (“EPA”) dated
                     between me and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc, (the “Company”) and (2) enhanced change of control benefits under the
Company’s Amended and Restated Supplemental Excess Retirement Plan (“SERP”), if I terminate my employment with the Company without Good Reason (that otherwise would trigger the foregoing rights) during the 30 day period following the
second anniversary of the consummation of the proposed transaction (including as such proposed transaction may be modified) to combine the Company with Vulcan Materials Company, as described in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4
filed by the Company on December 12, 2011. 
 We agree that, in consideration of my continued employment, effective immediately
this letter agreement amends the EPA, which otherwise shall continue in full force and effect; and that the Company may amend the SERP to implement the terms of this letter agreement. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	  

	Employee Name


  

					
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:
	
	MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title: