T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ST EW ART L AM LE , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C IT Y O F S A N T A M O N IC A , a M un i ci pal c o rp o r a tio n ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 56580 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 4 - c v - 0 6 3 5 5 - G H K - SH ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G e or ge H . K i ng, C hi e f

J udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r13, 2012 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , T R O T T , a n dW . F L E T C H E R , C ir c u it J u d g e s . S t e w a rtL a m l e appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng fe dera l and st at e l aw cl ai m s c hal l engi ng ordi nances th a t r e g u la te h is s a le o f

ab o a r dg a m e a t a n o u td o o rp e d e s tr ia n m a ll in S a n ta 

# FI LED NO V 20 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 56580 2 M o n ic a . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o b o th th e d is m is s a l o f

c la im s a n ds u m m a ryju d g m e n t, D o e v. A b b o t t L a b s. , 571 F . 3d 930, 9 3 3 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 9 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. Th e d i s tr i c tc o u rtp r o p e r l yd i s mi s s e dLa ml e ’ s Fi r s tA me n d me n tc l a i ms fa ci al l y c hal l engi ng bo th o rdi nances ati ss ue because L am l e f ai l ed t o al l ege f

ac t s a s t o h ow the ordi nances i m perm i ss i bl y r es tri ct ed express i ve cond uctor w er e u n c o n s titu tio n a llyv a g u e o ro v e rb r o a d . See Fo t iv. C i t y o f Men lo P a rk , 146 F . 3d 629, 635 ( 9th C i r . 1998) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dL a m le ’s F ir s t A m e n d m e n t c la im a lle g in g a n a s - ap p lie dc h a lle n g e to th e S tr e e t P e r f o rm e r s O r d in a n c e b e c au s e L a m le fa i l ed t o al l ege how the al l egedl y und er -i ncl usi ve defi ni t i on of stre etperf orm ance in th is o r d in a n c e a m o u n te dto v ie w p o in t d is c r im in a tio n . Se e id. T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y g ran t ed su m m ary j u d g m en to n L am l e’ s F i rst A m endm entcl ai m al l egi ng an as -app l i ed chal l enge t o the V endi ng O rdi nance b e c au s e L a m le f

a ile dto r a is e ag e n u in e d is p u te o f m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rth is ordi nance const i tut ed vi ew po i ntdi sc ri m i nat i on , and n ota r ea sonabl e t i m e, pl ac e, a n dm a n n e rr e s tr ic tio n o n e x p r e s s iv e a c tiv ity . Se e id . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d a l l of L a m l e ’ s c l a i m s a ga i ns tthe pr os e c ut orde f

e nda nt s be c aus e the i ra l l e ge d c onduc tf e l l w i thi n the s c ope of10- 56580 3 p r o s e c u to r ia l d u tie s th a t a r e e n title dto ab s o lu te im m u n ity . See Mi l stei n v. C oo ley , 25 7 F . 3d 10 04 , 10 08 (9th C i r. 20 01 ). T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dL a m le ’s F o u rth , F if th , a n dS ix th A m en d m en tcl ai m s t o th e ex t en tth atth ey aro se b efo re A u g u st4 , 2 0 0 2 b ecau se th e yw e r e tim e - b a rr e d , a n dp r o p e r lyd is m is s e dh is s ta te la w c la im s b e c au s e L a m le f a ile dto c o m p lyw ith th e C a lif o rn iaT o rt C la im s A c t. See C a l. G o v ’t C o d e § 9 4 5 .4 (c l ai m s pre se ntm enti s nec es sarybefore sui ng pu bl i c e nt i t i es ); M aldo na do v. H a rr is , 370 F . 3d 945, 954- 55 ( 9th C i r . 2004) ( unde rC a l i f orni al a w , the r e i s atw oye arl i m i t at i on s per i od for § 19 83 cl ai m s) . T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng L am l e l eave t o fi l e a f o u rth a m e n d e dc o m p la in t b e c au s e f u rth e ra m e n d m e n t w o u ldh av e b e e n f u tile . See Cho do s v . W

es t P ub l ’g C o. , Inc. , 29 2 F . 3d 99 2, 10 03 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( di stri ctcourt has broad di sc re t i on t o d eny l eave t o am end aft erhavi ng previ ou sl y grant ed i t ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng L a m l e ’ s m ot i on f or a co n t i n u an ce o f su m m ary j u d g m en tso h e co u l dco n d u ctfu rth er d i sco v ery b ecau se L am l e f ai l ed t o est abl i sh ho w addi t i on al di sc ov ery w ou l d h ave prec l ud ed sum m ary ju d g m e n t. See Cha nce v . P ac-T el T eletrac I nc. , 24 2 F . 3d 11 51 , 11 61 n. 6 (9th C i r. 20 01 ) ( st andard of revi ew for F ed. R . C i v. P . 56 (d) m ot i on s) . W e g r a n t d e f

e n d a n ts ’ r e q u e s t f

o rju d ic ia l n o tic e . See F e d. R . E vi d. 201.10- 56580 4 W e d o n o t c o n s id e ris s u e s r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See G reger v . B a rn h a rt , 46 4 F . 3d 96 8, 97 3 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). A rgum ent s notexpres sl y r ai se d o r s up po rt ed by ar gu m entar e dee m ed w ai ved, i ncl ud i ng chal l enges t o the di sm i ss al of cl ai m s on the basi s of qual i fi ed im m u n ityo rf

o rf a ilu r e to a lle g e f

a c ts n e c e s s a ryto im p o s e m u n ic ip a l liab ility . See C o o k v. Sch ri ro , 5 3 8 F .3 d1 0 0 0 , 1 0 1 4 n .5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . AF F I RME D.