alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 3

- 00 099

- C V



### ____________________

ISABEL NEWTON AND THOMAS NEWTON

, Appellant s

V.

ERIC PACK AND SADLER CLINIC PLLC , Appellee s

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 12

- 07

- 07612 CV

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellant s

, Isabel Newton and Thomas Newton , filed a motion to dismiss this

appeal. The motion is voluntarily made by the appellant prior to any decision of this

Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed notice of appeal. We grant

the motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

_____________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Opinion Delivered June 27, 2013

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
NUMBER 13-09-00005-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

STANLEY UZOIGWE, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND D/B/A PEDIATRIC PRACTICE ASSOCIATION, Appellants,

v.

TESORO CORPORATION D/B/A 

AAA CUSTOM & ELECTRICAL SIGNS, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on June 26, 2009. On July 9,

2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and

that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of
2

Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this

letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly

injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been

received from appellant. 

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 24th day of September, 2009.
**
**Exhibit 31.3**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14 and 15d-14**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Teofilo David Raad, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pulmatrix, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Date: July 24, 2019 

 

/s/ Teofilo David Raad
Teofilo David RaadPresident & Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)**
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 16 Referred in House (RFH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 16

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2015

              Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF POLICY ON RELEASE OF UNITED STATES CITIZENS IN 
              IRAN.

    (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) Saeed Abedini of Idaho is a Christian pastor unjustly 
        detained in Iran since 2012 and sentenced to eight years in 
        prison on charges related to his religious beliefs.
            (2) Amir Hekmati of Michigan is a former United States 
        Marine unjustly detained in 2011 while visiting his Iranian 
        relatives and sentenced to 10 years in prison for espionage.
            (3) Jason Rezaian of California is a Washington Post 
        journalist credentialed by the Government of Iran. He was 
        unjustly detained in 2014 and has been held without a trial.
            (4) Robert Levinson of Florida is a former Federal Bureau 
        of Investigations (FBI) official who disappeared in 2007 in 
        Iran. He is the longest held United States citizen in United 
        States history.
    (b) Statement of Policy.--It is the policy of the United States 
that--
            (1) the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran should 
        immediately release Saeed Abedini, Amir Hekmati, and Jason 
        Rezaian, and cooperate with the United States Government to 
        locate and return Robert Levinson; and
            (2) the United States Government should undertake every 
        effort using every diplomatic tool at its disposal to secure 
        their immediate release.

            Passed the Senate May 11, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                 JULIE E. ADAMS

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Melvin STERNBERG, et al., petitioners, v. Logan T. JOHNSTON, III.

No. 09-1374.

Oct. 4, 2010.

Case below, 595 F.3d 937.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Unassociated Document





 


Exhibit 10.40


 


To:           Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Beijing Zhongguanchun Branch


 


 


Beijing Wowjoint Machinery Co., Ltd. (Wowjoint Holding Limited) has obtained a guarantee from Zhongguancun Sci-tech Guaranty Co. Ltd. in the amount of RMB40 million with term from November 15, 2010 to November 14, 2012.


 


Based on this guarantee, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Beijing Zhongguanchun Branch has granted RMB40 million credit line to Beijing Wowjoint Machinery Co., Ltd. Of which, RMB10 million can be used to fund working capital and the remainder RMB30 million can be used to issue guarantees.


 


As of today, Beijing Wowjoint Machinery Co., Ltd. has fully drawn and utilized the RMB10 million working capital credit line.  We have issued guarantees worth RMB11.84 million and the remainder RMB18.16 million line is available for use. 


 


Please confirm.


 


Official seal:                      Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Beijing Zhongguanchun Branch


 


Official seal:                      Beijing Wowjoint Machinery Co., Ltd. 


 


2011.10.17
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Health
Fitness Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2005 (the
"Periodic Report"), I, Wesley W. Winnekins, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

/s/ Wesley W. Winnekins
-----------------------
Wesley W. Winnekins
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2005
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Croghan Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Allan E. Mehlow, Treasurer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.

Date: October 27, 2004                           /s/ Allan E. Mehlow
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 Allan E. Mehlow, Treasurer

* This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed "filed" for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as otherwise stated in such filing.

                                       20
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6517

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ORTEZ ANTOINNE PROPST,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CR-91-119, CA-01-60-3-2-MU)

Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 18, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ortez Antoinne Propst, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ortez Antoinne Propst seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Propst, Nos. CR-91-119; CA01-60-3-2-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18981]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security.
    Title: Additional Protocol to the U.S.-IAEA Safeguards Agreement 
Report Forms.
    Form Number(s): N/A.
    OMB Control Number: 0694-0135.
    Type of Review: Regular submission.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 844.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 500.
    Estimated Time per Response: 22 minutes to 6 hours.
    Needs and Uses: This collection covers information concerning 
Additional Protocols required from the United States to submit 
declaration forms to the IAEA on a number of commercial nuclear and 
nuclear-related items, materials, and activities that may be used for 
peaceful nuclear purposes, but also would be necessary elements for a 
nuclear weapons program.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov 
http://www.reginfo.gov/public/. Follow the instructions to view 
Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80cfc9d2c1dfd3f5e2ede9f3f3e9efeec0efede2aee5eff0aee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6999f84978985a3b4bbbfa5a5bfb9b896b9bbb4f8b3b9a6f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-18981 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 11**

 

**Citizens Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries**

**Computation of Per Share Earnings**

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

| Three Months Ended March 31    | 2007                      | 2006                      |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------|---------------------------|
|                           |                      |                      |
| Numerator:                     |                      |                      |
| Net Income (Loss)              | $            (180,851)    | $              227,735    |
|                           |                      |                      |
|                           |                      |                      |
| Denominator:                   |                      |                      |
| Weighted average common shares | 1,588,011                 | 1,671,522                 |
|                           |                      |                      |
|                           |                      |                      |
| Earnings Per Share:            |                      |                      |
| Net Income (Loss)              | $                  (0.11) | $                    0.14 |
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 29 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION 

4 HALL OF THE CAPITOL. 

5 The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the United 

6 States Capitol are authorized to be used on January 20, 

7 2017, by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 

8 Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and cere9 monies conducted for the inauguration of the President10 elect and the Vice President-elect of the United States. 

Passed the Senate January 20, 2016. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 29 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To authorize the use of the rotunda and EmanciStates. elect and the Vice President-elect of the United conducted for the inauguration of the President- connection with the proceedings and ceremonies sional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in pation Hall of the Capitol by the Joint Congres-
1 The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-4065

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. Earl Smith, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 25, 2003 Filed: July 9, 2003

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Earl Smith (Smith) pled guilty to possessing with intent to distribute over 50 grams of a mixture containing a detectable amount of cocaine base (crack), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court 1 applied a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a firearm, and sentenced Smith to 120 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Smith argues that the district court clearly erred in applying the enhancement because the government did not show that he possessed the firearm or that it was connected with-2- the offense. Smith’s live-in girlfriend testified at the sentencing hearing she owned the gun for protection, she had not seen Smith with the weapon, and she did not know Smith was dealing drugs. We affirm. The district court did not clearly err in applying the enhancement. Smith had constructive possession over the loaded firearm, as it was found in the apartment where he resided with his girlfriend. Further, the gun was found in the same room as a large amount of cash, drug paraphernalia was found in the kitchen, and, at the time of the search, Smith was attempting to flush drugs down the toilet. SeeUnited States v. Braggs , 317 F.3d 901, 904 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review); United States v. Betz , 82 F.3d 205, 210-11 (8th Cir. 1996) (upholding enhancement where loaded firearms and drugs were found in different places on defendant’s property); United States v. Payne , 81 F.3d 759, 762 (8th Cir. 1996) (“either actual or constructive possession is sufficient, i.e., the individual must have exercised ownership, dominion, or control either over the firearm or the premises on which it is found”) (internal quotation and citation omitted). The district court discredited Smith’s girlfriend’s testimony regarding the weapon, which is virtually unreviewable on appeal. See United States v. Gutierrez-Manzanarez , 323 F.3d 613, 615 (8th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 942 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 942

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a deduction from 
      the gift tax for gifts made to certain exempt organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 15, 2015

  Mr. Portman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a deduction from 
      the gift tax for gifts made to certain exempt organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Treatment for All Gifts Act''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FROM GIFT TAX FOR GIFTS MADE TO CERTAIN EXEMPT 
              ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2522(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking the period at the end of paragraph (4) and 
inserting a semicolon and by inserting after paragraph (4) the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(5) an organization described in paragraph (4), (5), or 
        (6) of section 501(c) and exempt from tax under section 
        501(a).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to gifts made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) No Inference.--Nothing in the amendments made by subsection (a) 
shall be construed to create any inference with respect to whether any 
transfer of property (whether made before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act) to an organization described in paragraph (4), 
(5), or (6) of section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is a 
transfer of property by gift for purposes of chapter 12 of such Code.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Health Fitness
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2005 (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Wesley W. Winnekins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

/s/ Wesley W. Winnekins

Wesley W. Winnekins
Chief Financial Officer
August 15, 2005
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rodrigo ZAVALA-JACOBO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40924

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 30, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rodrigo Zavala-Jacobo raises arguments that are foreclosed by *AlmendarezTorres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
EX-35.6
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
383 Madison Avenue
31st Floor
New York, New York 10179


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
    Securities Trust 2013-LC11 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
    Series 2013-LC11

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 7, 2014

/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.