alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Maria Saucedo CALVILLO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-72213.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.*

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

William B. Bennett, Esq., Manulkin Glaser & Bennett, Fountain Valley, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Mark C. Walters, Esq., Melissa Neiman-Kelting, Stephen J. Flynn, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Saucedo Calvillo petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion *952to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.

The evidence Saucedo Calvillo presented with her motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds as her application for cancellation of removal. *See Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 602-03 (9th Cir.2006). We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that the evidence would not alter its prior discretionary determination that she failed to establish the requisite hardship. *See id.*at 600 (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)® bars this court from reviewing the denial of a motion to reopen where “the only question presented is whether [the] new evidence altered the prior, underlying discretionary determination that [the petitioner] had not met the hardship standard.”) (Internal quotations and brackets omitted).

To the extent Saucedo Calviljo contends the BIA failed to consider some or all of the evidence she submitted with the motion to reopen, she has not overcome the presumption that the BIA did review the record. *See Fernandez,*439 F.3d at 603.

Saucedo Calvillo’s contention that the BIA violated her due process rights by failing to rule on her request for a stay of voluntary departure pending a decision on her motion to reopen does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute color-able constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction”); *see also Azarte v. Ashcroft,*394 F.3d 1278, 1288-89 (9th Cir.2005) (where a motion to reopen requests a stay of voluntary departure and is filed within the voluntary departure period, voluntary departure is automatically stayed).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0429

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JOSHUA CHARLES PERRAS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 15, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 30 2024

09/30/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0429
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at March 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Operations
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         129,463
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               237,584
<PP&E>                                       2,244,628
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,578,479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 903,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,450
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     899,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   903,733
<SALES>                                        128,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,765
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 90,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             90,207
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    90,207
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    13.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    13.17
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40025-40026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--ADPR 1 Contracts

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add Alternative Delivery Provider 
Reseller 1 product to the Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): August 23, 
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lauren Schuttloffel, (202) 268-4198.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642, on August 15, 
2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of the 
United States Postal Service to Add Alternative Delivery Provider 
Reseller 1 Contracts to the Competitive Products List, and Notice of 
Filing (Under Seal) of Contract and Application for Non-Public 
Treatment of Materials Filed Under Seal. Documents are available at

[[Page 40026]]

www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017-170 and CP2017-268.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-17826 Filed 8-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
S. J. Res. 8 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 

Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor Relations Board relating 

to representation case procedures. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the National Labor Relations 

Board relating to representation case procedures (published at 79 

Fed. Reg. 74308 (December 15, 2014)), and such rule shall have 

no force or effect. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# cc: Hon. Cynthia Dianne Steel, District Judge, Family Court Division Lynn E. Wells Abrams Law Firm, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER 

# 2
(01.1947
----

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      L. Paul Latham                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| L.      Paul Latham                                          |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer                   |
| of      Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                       |
| Managing      General Partner of                             |
| Southwest      Royalties Institutional Income Fund X-C, L.P. |
|                                                         |
| November      12, 2008                                       |
|                                                         |
|                                                         |
| /s/      Mel G. Riggs                                        |
| Mel      G. Riggs                                            |
| Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer of           |
| Southwest      Royalties, Inc., the                          |
| Managing      General Partner of                             |
| Southwest      Royalties Institutional Income Fund X-C, L.P. |
|                                                         |
| November      12, 2008                                       |
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE U.S. CODE
  1.
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the
Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Terence E. HallTerence E. HallChairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer

Superior Energy Services, Inc.
Filed 5/30/24 P. v. Mustin CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions 

not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion 

has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

 Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JOSEPH SAMUEL MUSTIN,

 Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B332404

(Super. Ct. No. 2021025620)

(Ventura County)

Joseph Samuel Mustin appeals from the judgment 

sentencing him to state prison after the trial court found him in 

violation of probation.

In 2021, Mustin entered a Walmart store, concealed 

merchandise in his backpack, and ran out the door without 

paying. When confronted by a store employee, he swung a 

baseball bat in the air and yelled for employees to not stop him. 

Mustin pleaded guilty to second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 

§§ 211, 212.5, subd. (c)). The court placed him on two years’ 

probation with terms including 285 days in county jail. 
2

In 2023, the court found Mustin in violation of probation. 

The court terminated probation and sentenced him to prison for 

the low term of two years. The court awarded credit for time 

served of 324 days actual time plus conduct credit of 15 percent 

(49 days) (Pen. Code, § 2933.1, subd. (c)). 

We appointed counsel to represent Mustin in this appeal. 

After counsel examined the record, she filed an opening brief that 

raises no arguable issues. On March 22, 2024, appointed counsel 

advised Mustin by mail that he had 30 days within which to file a 

supplemental brief to raise any issues he wished us to consider. 

We have not received a response. 

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that 

Mustin’s attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and 

that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 

436, 441-443.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

BALTODANO, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P. J. YEGAN, J.
Paul W. Baelly, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Gloria C. Cohen, under appointment by the Court of 

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2013-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                     Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                     Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                     I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                     All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 
| Dated March 23,   2016 |                                               |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                               |
|                        | /s/ Brian E. Schaaf                                |
|                        | Brian E. Schaaf                                    |
|                        | Vice President and   Assistant Treasurer           |
|                        | Ford Motor Credit   Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|                        | (senior officer in   charge of servicing function) |

 

----
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2013-CCRE8 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information requiredto be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities requiredto be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been includedas an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to meby the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNRPartners, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer for the 375 Park Avenue Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,as Special Servicer for the 375 Park Avenue Mortgage Loan, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the 375 Park Avenue MortgageLoan, Citibank, N.A., as Custodian for the 375 Park Avenue Mortgage Loan, U.S. Bank National Association, as Servicing Function Participantfor the 375 Park Avenue Mortgage Loan, and CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the 375 Park Avenue MortgageLoan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 17,2022

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Americomm Resources Corporation
                         15 E. 5th Street, Suite 4000
                         Tulsa, Oklahoma  74103-4346

                              PROMISSORY NOTE

Maker:  Americomm Resources Corporation     Date of Note:
        15 E. 5th Street, Suite 4000        March 15, 1999
        Tulsa, Oklahoma  74103-4346
                                            Maturity Date:
                                            June 30, 1999

                                            Amount of Note:
                                            $105,000 + 10% interest at
                                            Maturity Date + additional
                                            amounts of accrued corporate
                                            operating expenses paid by
                                            A. E. Whitehead

     This note, drawn in favor of Albert E. Whitehead Living Trust, Albert
E. Whitehead, Trustee, in the amount of $105,000 plus 10% interest, is due 
and payable June 30, 1999.  At his option, A. E. Whitehead may elect to 
extend the maturity date or otherwise modify the payment terms.  A. E.
Whitehead further agrees to pay certain corporate operating expenses to be 
added to the original amount of this note under the same terms.

     The proceeds of this loan will be used by Americomm Resources Corporation
to pay rentals on Federal leases due April 1, 1999, for its Cheyenne River
Prospect in Wyoming.

                                     Americomm Resources Corporation




Albert E. Whitehead, Trustee         Thomas R. Bradley, President & CEO
Albert E. Whitehead Living Trust
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 35 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 35

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of Labor 
   relating to ``Interpretation of the `Advice' Exemption in Section 
     203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 9, 2016

  Mr. Flake (for himself and Mr. Alexander) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of Labor 
   relating to ``Interpretation of the `Advice' Exemption in Section 
     203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Interpretation 
of the `Advice' Exemption in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management 
Reporting and Disclosure Act'' (81 Fed. Reg. 15923 (March 24, 2016)), 
and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
ex49.htm


EXHIBIT 4.9





HYGEA HOLDINGS CORP.


(f/k/a PIPER ACQUISITION II, INC.)



9100 South Dadeland Blvd., Suite 1500


Miami, Florida 33156









November 16, 2011







_______________________


_______________________


_______________________







Re:           Hygea Holdings Corp. (f/k/a Piper Acquisition II Inc.) (the “Company”)







Mr. ___________:







Reference is hereby made to the 10% convertible note (the “Note”) issued by the Company on [insert issuance date] to the undersigned (the “Investor”).  The Note is convertible, at any time at a conversion price of $0.11 per share.  The Note bears interest at __% per annum and matured on October 30, 2011 (the “Maturity Date”).







By executing this letter, Investor agrees to extend the Maturity Date of the Note to March 31, 2012.







This letter agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts.  We hereby request that you execute this letter agreement below acknowledging and agreeing to the terms set forth herein.







 




	 	

Sincerely,

	 
	 	 	 
	 	



HYGEA HOLDINGS CORP.


(f/k/a PIPER ACQUISITION II, INC.)



	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ 	 
	 	Name:	 	 
	 	Title:	 	 
	 	 	 	 







AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED: