alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DONALD CAMPBELL, a/k/a Louis Butler, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-00-290-AW, CA-02-3815-AW) Submitted: September 11, 2003 Decided: September 24, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Mythili Raman, Gina Laurie Simms, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donald Campbell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Campbell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Campbell’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MARSHALL MARTIN

, 1

Petitioner Below, Appellant,

v.

LONDON VALENTINE

,
Respondent Below, Appellee. § § No. 401, 2022 § § § Court Below

– Family Court § of the State of Delaware § § § File No. CK21

- 02925 § Petition No. 22

- 20174 §

Submitted: October 31 , 2022 Decided: November 18 , 2022

Before VALIHURA

, VAUGHN

, and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response

,

it appears to the Court that:

(1) On October 25 , 2022 , the appellant, Marshall Martin , filed a notice of

appeal from the Family Court’s September 23, 2022 order dismissing his petition for

custody

. Under Supreme Court Rule 6, a timely notice of appeal was du e on or

before October 24, 2022

. 2

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).

2 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a) (i)

. Because the thirtieth day fell on a Sunday, the notice of appeal was due before the close of the next business day

— Monday, October 24, 202 2. Del. Supr. Ct. R. 11(a).2

(2) T he Senio r Court Clerk issued a notice directing Martin to show cause

why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. In his response to the

notice to show cause, Martin asks for a rehearing of the Family C ourt’s order and

argues the merits of his appeal but does not explain why he did not file a timely

notice of appeal

.

(3) Time is a jurisdictional requirement. 3 A notice of appeal must be

received by the Court within the applicable time period to be effective. 4 An

appellant’s pro se status does not excuse his failure to comply strictly with the

jurisdictional requirements of Supreme Court Rule 6. 5 Unless an appellant can

demonstrate that his failure to file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to court

related personnel, the appeal cannot be considered. 6

(4) The record does not reflect that Martin’ s failure to file a timely notice

of appeal in this ca se is attributable to court

- related personnel. Consequently, this

case does not fall within the exception to the general rule that mandates the timely

filing of a notice of appeal, and this appeal must therefore be dismissed. To the

extent that Martin wi shes to pursue relief under Family Court Civil Procedure Rule

59, he must do so in the Family Court in the first instance.

3 Carr v. State , 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del.), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 829 (1989).

4 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 10(a).

5 See Smith v. State , 47 A.3d 481 (Del. 2012).

6 Bey v. State , 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979).3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court

Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.
J ustice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES CONTAINED IN FORM 10-K AS
FILED HEREWITH, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,002
<SECURITIES>                                    46,546
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           1,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          2,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,111
<SALES>                                          3,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,370
<CGS>                                            2,187
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,487
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,828
<INCOME-TAX>                                       898
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,902
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,902
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1,542
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1,542


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           75,490
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                               0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                 0
<EQUITIES>                                     24,163
<MORTGAGE>                                        163
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   3,593
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                108,022
<CASH>                                          7,335
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                175
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          4,157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                133,133
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                77,463
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                               250
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  1,343
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          16,279
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 6,383
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,800
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  133,133
<PREMIUMS>                                      4,946
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             1,510
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              1,542
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     12
<BENEFITS>                                      3,835
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                       418
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            2,229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,588
<INCOME-TAX>                                      425
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,163
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.65
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                      0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                 0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                     0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0
        


</TABLE>
# Patent

## Title
Power tool

## Abstract

Although certain features of the soil cultivating implement that have been described and/or that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings will be set forth in the following claims as inventive features, it is emphasised that the invention is not necessarily limited to those features and that it includes within its scope each of the parts of the soil cultivating implement that has been described, and/or that is illustrated in the accompanying drawings, both individually and in various combinations.

## Background
## Claims

1. A soil cultivating implement comprising a frame and a transverse row of soil working members rotatably mounted on respective stub shafts that define upwardly extending axes, each soil working member having downwardly extending tines positioned around its axis of rotation and being freely rotatable about its corresponding axis responsive to the contact of its tines with the ground, said soil working members being releaseably fastened with respective brackets on an elongated beam that extends transverse to the direction of travel, the stub shafts of said soil working members being held in said brackets, said brackets being positioned directly below said beam and being obliquely inclined to the vertical, said shafts being substantially parallel to one another and located in a transverse plane that extends substantially perpendicular to the normal direction of implement travel, each of said brackets being channel shaped with a base positioned between limbs, said limbs having dissimilar vertical lengths and said base being inclined to the horizontal, a respective stub shaft being journalled in said base, said tines each having a substantially straight soil working portion that in the lowest position of the tine, extends obliquely forwardly with respect to the front of the machine, a ground engaging roller being positioned to the rear of said row of soil working members and said roller being connected to the frame and supporting same, said roller extending at least partly across the working width of the implement, the axis of rotation of said roller extending substantially horizontal and parallel to said plane.

2. An implement as claimed in claim 1, wherein there are four tines positioned at 90.degree. intervals around said axis of rotation.

3. Am implement as claimed in claim 1, wherein a cultivator tine is secured to said beam between neighboring soil working members and said tine is resilient.

4. An implement as claimed in claim 3, wherein said tine is positioned nearer the axis of rotation of one soil working member than the axis of rotation of the neighboring soil member.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         422,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  861,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    591,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,065,000
<PP&E>                                       1,327,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,997,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,470,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     23,000
<COMMON>                                     6,895,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (76,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,997,000
<SALES>                                      4,802,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,867,000
<CGS>                                        3,009,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,009,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,908,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             138,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,992,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,992,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,992,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.8

 

AMENDMENT    NUMBER    TWO

 

 

AUTOMATIC REINSURANCE AGREEMENT

 

 

NUMBER              2509-09AY10 between

 

 

AMERICAN LIFE AND SECURITY CORPORATION

 

8101 O Street, Suite 101

 

Lincoln, Nebraska 68510

 

 

(The Ceding Company)

 

 

and

 

 

OPTIMUM RE INSURANCE COMPANY

 

1345 River Bend Drive, Suite 100

 

Dallas, TX 75247 

 

 

(The Reinsurer)

 

 

Respecting the reinsurance premium calculation and submission.

 

1











 

1.     Effective from inception, August 1, 2009, this Agreement shall be amended to reflect a change in the reinsurance premium calculation and submission from an annual basis to a monthly basis as follows:

 

A.                 Article 5.2., Standard Risks, shall be deleted and replaced by the following language:

 

Monthly reinsurance premiums for standard risks shall be calculated at 1/12th of the annual premium rates specified in SCHEDULE F.

 

B.                 Article 8.1., Reinsurance Premiums, shall be deleted and replaced by the following language:

 

The reinsurance premiums are due on the policy issue date of the policy and every subsequent month thereafter and payable to OPTIMUM RE on a monthly basis regardless of how premiums are paid to THE COMPANY.

 

2.                    Signatures         The terms and conditions of this Agreement are not changed in any way except as stated herein.

 

In witness of the above, this Amendment is signed in duplicate at the dates and places indicated.

 

FOR                    AMERICAN LIFE AND SECURITY CORPORATION

 

 

	
DATE:
    	
6/6/11
    	
 
    	
SIGNATURE:
    	
/S/ Mark Oliver
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
PLACE:
    	
Lincoln, NE
    	
 
    	
NAME:
    	
Mark A. Oliver
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
WITNESS:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
TITLE:
    	
CEO
    
									


 

 

FOR                    OPTIMUM RE INSURANCE COMPANY

 

 

	
DATE:
    	
5/23/11
    	
 
    	
SIGNATURE:
    	
/S/ Mario Georgiev
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
PLACE:
    	
Dallas, TX
    	
 
    	
NAME:
    	
Mario Georgiev
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
WITNESS:
    	
  /S/   Unknown
    	
 
    	
TITLE:
    	
CEO
    
									


 

2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to myknowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2005 of Graphic Packaging Corporation (the “Company”) filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|   | /s/ Daniel J. Blount                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Daniel J. Blount                                    |
|   | Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |
|   | November 3,  2005                                    |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to my knowledge, the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 of Graphic PackagingCorporation (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ STEPHEN M. HUMPHREY                      |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Stephen M. Humphrey                    |
|   |   | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | May 9, 2005                                  |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                        COLLABORATIVE CLINICAL RESEARCH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                        STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                                         OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


                                                        Three Months        Six Months
                                                        Ended June 30,      Ended June 30,
                                                      -----------------   -----------------
                                                        1997      1996      1997      1996
                                                      -------   -------   -------   -------

<S>                                                   <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income (loss)                                     $  (487)  $   288   $  (905)  $   344
                                                      =======   =======   =======   =======

Weighted average common shares outstanding              6,384     3,306     6,363     2,960
Net effect of dilutive common share options
        and dilutive common share warrants - Note A        --       465        --       474
Shares used in calculation of net income
                                                      -------   -------   -------   -------
        (loss) per common share                         6,384     3,771     6,363     3,434
                                                      =======   =======   =======   =======

Net income (loss) per common share - Note B           $ (0.08)  $  0.08   $ (0.14)  $  0.10
                                                      =======   =======   =======   =======


NOTE A - Common share  options and warrants  granted  within a twelve month period  preceding the Company's
         initial public offering are included as if they were  outstanding  for all periods  presented prior to
         the Company's initial public offering.  The dilutive effect of all options  outstanding was calculated
         using the treasury stock method.

NOTE B - Fully  diluted net income  (loss) per common  share has not been  presented  because the effect is
         either immaterial or anti-dilutive.
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      454092 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1019232 
<ALLOWANCES>                                 28600 
<INVENTORY>                                1385588 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           3455696 
<PP&E>                                      715133 
<DEPRECIATION>                              399862 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             3787640 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       868424 
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     49282 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                 121588 
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               3787640 
<SALES>                                    2442950 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           5218097 
<CGS>                                      2448011 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              4034649 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          132397 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1729705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (1729705)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (1729705)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.37)
        

</TABLE>