42294 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2017 / Notices 

publication of the final results of this 

review for shipments of the subject 

merchandise from the PRC entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided by sections 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

companies listed above that have a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is de minimis, then cash deposit rate 

will be zero); (2) for previously 

examined PRC and non-PRC exporters 

not listed above that at the time of entry 

are eligible for a separate rate based on 

a prior completed segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific cash deposit rate; (3) for all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate at the time of entry, the 

cash deposit rate will be that for the 

PRC-wide entity (i.e., 118.04 percent); 

and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise which at the time 

of entry are not eligible for a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to the PRC exporter that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during the POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Department’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This preliminary determination is 

issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: August 31, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 1 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

5. Non-Market Economy Country Status 

6. Separate Rates 

7. Application of Facts Available and Use of 

Adverse Inference 

8. Facts Available 

9. Surrogate Country 

10. Date of Sale 

11. Normal Value Comparisons 

12. Factor Valuation Methodology 

13. Comparisons to Normal Value 

14. Currency Conversion 

15. Recommendation 

Appendix 2 

1. Aironware (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

2. Certified Products Taiwan Inc. 

3. Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. Corp. 

4. Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd. 

5. Huanghua Xionghua Hardware Products 

Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18977 Filed 9–6–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Proposed Information Collection; 

Comment Request; EU–U.S. Privacy 

Shield; Invitation for Applications for 

Inclusion on the List of Arbitrators 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork and 

respondent burden, invites the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on 

proposed and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted on or before November 6, 

2017. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental 

Paperwork Clearance Officer, 

Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 

14th and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230 (or via the 

Internet at PRAcomments@doc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the information collection 

instrument and instructions should be 

directed to Nasreen Djouini at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, either by 

email at Nasreen.Djouini@trade.gov, or 

by fax at: 202–482–5522. More 

information on the arbitration 

mechanism may be found at https://

www.privacyshield.gov/ 

article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

The EU–U.S. Privacy Shield 

Framework was designed by the U.S. 

Department of Commerce (DOC) and the 

European Commission (Commission) to 

provide companies on both sides of the 

Atlantic with a mechanism to comply 

with data protection requirements when 

transferring personal data from the 

European Union to the United States in 

support of transatlantic commerce. On 

July 12, 2016, the Commission deemed 

the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework 

(Privacy Shield) adequate to enable data 

transfers under EU law, and on August 

1, 2016, the DOC began accepting selfcertifications from U.S. companies to 

join the program (81 FR 47752; July 22, 

2016). For more information on the 

Privacy Shield, visit 

www.privacyshield.gov. 

As described in Annex I of the 

Privacy Shield, the DOC and the 

Commission have committed to 

implement an arbitration mechanism to 

provide European individuals with the 

ability to invoke binding arbitration to 

determine, for residual claims, whether 

an organization has violated its 

obligations under the Privacy Shield. 

Organizations voluntarily self-certify to 

the Privacy Shield and, upon 

certification, the commitments the 

organization has made to comply with 

the Privacy Shield become legally 

enforceable under U.S. law. 

Organizations that self-certify to the 

Privacy Shield commit to binding 

arbitration of residual claims if the 

individual chooses to exercise that 

option. Under the arbitration option, a 

Privacy Shield Panel (consisting of one 

or three arbitrators, as agreed by the 

parties) has the authority to impose 

individual-specific, non-monetary 

equitable relief (such as access, 

correction, deletion, or return of the 

individual’s data in question) necessary 

to remedy the violation of the Privacy 

Shield only with respect to the 

individual. The parties will select the 

arbitrators from the list of arbitrators 

described below. 

The DOC and the European 

Commission seek to develop a list of at 

least 20 arbitrators. To be eligible for 

inclusion on the list, applicants must be 

admitted to practice law in the United 

States and have expertise in both U.S. 

privacy law and EU data protection law. 

Applicants shall not be subject to any 

instructions from, or be affiliated with, 

any Privacy Shield organization, or the 

U.S., EU, or any EU Member State or 

any other governmental authority, 

public authority or enforcement 

authority. 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2017 / Notices 42295 

aFor more information about the selection 

process and the role of the administrator, see 

https://www.privacyshield.gov/Arbitration-FactSheet. 

Eligible individuals will be evaluated 

on the basis of independence, integrity, 

and expertise: 

Independence 

• Freedom from bias and prejudice. 

Integrity 

• Held in the highest regard by peers 

for integrity, fairness and good 

judgment. 

• Demonstrates high ethical standards 

and commitment necessary to be an 

arbitrator. 

Expertise 

Required: 

• Admission to practice law in the 

United States. 

• Level of demonstrated expertise in 

U.S. privacy law and EU data protection 

law. 

Other expertise that may be 

considered includes any of the 

following: 

• Relevant educational degrees and 

professional licenses. 

• Relevant professional or academic 

experience or legal practice. 

• Relevant training or experience in 

arbitration or other forms of dispute 

resolution. 

Evaluation of applications for 

inclusion on the list of arbitrators will 

be undertaken by the DOC and the 

Commission. Selected applicants will 

remain on the list for a period of 3 years, 

absent exceptional circumstances; 

change in eligibility, or for cause, 

renewable for one additional period of 

3 years. 

The DOC is in the process of selecting 

an administrator for Privacy Shield 

arbitrations.a Among other things, once 

selected, the Administrator will 

facilitate arbitrator fee arrangements, 

including the collection and timely 

payment of arbitrator fees and other 

expenses. Arbitrators are expected to 

commit their time and effort when 

included on the Privacy Shield List of 

Arbitrators and to take reasonable steps 

to minimize the costs or fees of the 

arbitration. 

Arbitrators will be subject to a code of 

conduct consistent with Annex I of the 

Privacy Shield Framework and 

generally accepted ethical standards for 

arbitrators. The DOC and the 

Commission agreed to adopt an existing, 

well-established set of U.S. arbitral 

procedures to govern the arbitral 

proceedings, subject to considerations 

identified in Annex I of the Privacy 

Shield Framework, including that 

materials submitted to arbitrators will 

be treated confidentially and will only 

be used in connection with the 

arbitration. For more information, 

please visit https://

www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=GArbitration-Procedures where you can 

find information on the arbitration 

procedures. 

Applications 

Eligible individuals who wish to be 

considered for inclusion on the EU–U.S. 

Privacy Shield List of Arbitrators are 

invited to submit applications by 

October 6, 2017 deadline. Applications 

must be typewritten and should be 

headed ‘‘Application for Inclusion on 

the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield List of 

Arbitrators.’’ Applications should 

include the following information, and 

each section of the application should 

be numbered as indicated: 

—Name of applicant. 

—Address, telephone number, and 

email address. 

1. Independence 

—Description of the applicant’s 

affiliations with any Privacy Shield 

organization, or the U.S., EU, any EU 

Member State or any other 

governmental authority, public 

authority, or enforcement authority. 

2. Integrity 

—On a separate page, the names, 

addresses, telephone, and fax 

numbers of three individuals willing 

to provide information concerning the 

applicant’s qualifications for service, 

including the applicant’s character, 

reputation, reliability, and judgment. 

—Description of the applicant’s 

willingness and ability to make time 

commitments necessary to be an 

arbitrator. 

3. Expertise 

—Demonstration of admittance to 

practice law in the United States. 

—Relevant academic degrees and 

professional training and licensing. 

—Current employment, including title, 

description of responsibility, name 

and address of employer, and name 

and telephone number of supervisor 

or other reference. 

—Employment history, including the 

dates and addresses of each prior 

position and a summary of 

responsibilities. 

—Description of expertise in U.S. 

privacy law and EU data protection 

law. 

—Description of training or experience 

in arbitration or other forms of 

dispute resolution, if applicable. 

—A list of publications, testimony, and 

speeches, if any, concerning U.S. 

privacy law and EU data protection 

law, with copies appended. 

II. Method of Collection 

Please submit applications by 

September 25, 2017 deadline to Nasreen 

Djouini at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce, either by email at 

Nasreen.Djouini@trade.gov, or by fax at: 

202–482–5522. More information on the 

arbitration mechanism may be found at 

https://www.privacyshield.gov/ 

article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0625–0277. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Review: Regular submission. 

Affected Public: private individuals. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

60. 

Estimated Time per Response: 240 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 240 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18896 Filed 9–6–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES