alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17925]



[[Page 40231]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Former Prisoners of War, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act that the Advisory Committee on Former 
Prisoners of War (FPOW) will meet September 13-15, 2017, from 9:00 
a.m.-4:30 p.m. CST at the Westin Peachtree Plaza Hotel, 210 Peachtree 
Street NW., Atlanta, GA 30303. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on the administration of benefits under Title 38 U.S.C., for 
Veterans who are FPOWs, and to make recommendations on the needs of 
such Veterans for compensation, health care, and rehabilitation.
    On Wednesday, September 13, the Committee will convene an open 
session to recognize and hear briefings from the Veterans Health 
Administration (VHA) officials and external stakeholders.
    On Thursday, September 14, the Committee will assemble an open 
session for discussion and hear briefings from the Veterans Benefits 
Administration (VBA) and Veterans Health Administration (VHA) officials 
and external stakeholders.
    On Friday, September 15, the Committee will participate in a 
National POW/MIA Recognition Day Ceremony at the Atlanta VA Medical 
Center located at 1700 Clairmont Road, Decatur, GA 30033. At 12:00 
p.m., the committee meeting will be formally adjourned.
    FPOWs who wish to speak at the public forum are invited to submit a 
1-2 page commentary for inclusion in official meeting records. Any 
member of the public may also submit a 1-2 page commentary for the 
Committee's review.
    Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting or seeking 
additional information should contact Ms. Leslie N. Williams, 
Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee on Former Prisoners of 
War at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#672b02140b0e0249300e0b0b0e060a145627110649000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2eec7d1cecbc78cf5cbcececbc3cfd193e2d4c38cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a> or via phone at (202) 530-9219.

    Dated: August 21, 2017.
Jelessa M. Burney,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-17925 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18413]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. A copy of the agreement is 
available through the Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a2e283b3e3f3b343b36232933291a3c3739743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e59197848180848b84899c968c96a5838886cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 011550-015.
    Title: ABC Discussion Agreement.
    Parties: Hamburg-S[uuml]d, King Ocean Services Limited, Seaboard 
Marine, Ltd.; and Crowley Caribbean Services, LLC.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1200 19th 
Street NW., Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment adds a new Article 13 suspending authority 
with respect to Curacao, deletes Seafreight Line as a party, and 
corrects the Agreement's table of contents.

    Agreement No.: 012489.
    Title: CMA CGM/Marinex Cargo Line U.S. Virgin Islands--Saint 
Maarten Service Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: CMA CGM S.A. and Marinex Cargo Line Inc.
    Filing Party: Draughn Arbona; CMA CGM (America) LLC; 5701 Lake 
Wright Drive; Norfolk, VA 23502.
    Synopsis: The Agreement authorizes Marinex Cargo Line to charter 
space to CMA CGM in the trade between the U.S. Virgin Islands and Saint 
Maarten.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: August 25, 2017.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-18413 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than September 21, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Stockmens Limited Partnership, Rapid City, South Dakota; to 
engage in investment advisory services, by acquiring a 24 percent 
interest in Rock Creek Advisors, LLC, Rapid City, South Dakota, and 
thereby engage in investment advisory services pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(6) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 1, 
2017.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-19007 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**IN THE INT. OF : M.B.**

**PETITION OF: DAUPHIN COUNTY**

**CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 174 MM 2014** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 5th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Re view of Emergency** 

**Supersedeas Order Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P 3315 and Motio n to Vacate is**  DENIED

**.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Statement of
Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,407
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,611
<PP&E>                                       1,101,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                 343,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 790,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               61
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     790,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   790,841
<SALES>                                        315,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,690
<CGS>                                          186,615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  186,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,785
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,785
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,785
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.39
        

</TABLE>
No. 99-60527 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-60527 Summary Calendar

SAJJAD HAIDER RIZVI; IQRAR HAIDER RIZVI; NABIHA HAIDER RIZVI; MUBASHIRA SAJJAD RIZVI, Petitioners,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA Nos. A29-924-885 A71-509-654 A71-509-655 A71-509-656

- - - - - - - - - - May 3, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing the appeal from the immigration judge’s decision to deny an application for asylum. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). TheNo. 99-60527 -2- petition for review is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                 4,720
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       4,720
<PP&E>                                               846,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       851,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                352,457
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              14,212
<OTHER-SE>                                         2,166,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         851,340
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      27,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         27,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (27,303)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Criteo S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J Benoit Fouilland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                              
|------------------------------
|Date: March 5, 2014           
|                              
|/s/ Benoit Fouilland          
|Name: Benoit Fouilland        
|Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-3 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2014 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2013, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive
Auto Receivables Trust 2013-3 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015/s/ Jennifer M. PoppName:

Jennifer M. PoppTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6138 

JAMES E. SIGLEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, Mount Olive

Correctional Complex,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief

District Judge. (1:04-cv-00198-WCB)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 29, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Sigley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James E. Sigley seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sigley has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                 |  |
| Name of Subsidiary                                                              | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
| Criteo Australia Pty Ltd                                              | Australia |
| Criteo Do Brasil Desenvolvimento De Serviços De Internet Ltda.   | Brazil |
| Criteo Canada Corp.                                                             | Canada |
| Criteo Advertising (Beijing) Co., Ltd.                                     | China |
| Criteo France S.A.S.                              | France |
| Criteo GmbH                                                           | Germany |
| Criteo S.R.L.                                                         | Italy |
| Criteo K.K.                                                           | Japan |
| Criteo B.V.                                                           | Netherlands |
| Criteo LLC                                                            | Russia |
| Criteo Singapore PTE. LTD.                                            | Singapore |
| Criteo Europa MM, S.L.                                                     | Spain (Barcelona) |
| Criteo España, S.L.                                              | Spain (Madrid) |
| Criteo Reklamcilik Hzimetleri ve Ticaret A.S.                                   | Turkey |
| Criteo MEA FZ - LLC                                                             | United Arab Emirates (Dubai) |
| Criteo Ltd                                                            | United Kingdom |
| Criteo Corp.                                                                    | United States (Delaware) |
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 14 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 14

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
            Commission regulating broadband Internet access.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 28, 2015

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
            Commission regulating broadband Internet access.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to 
regulating broadband Internet access (published at 80 Fed. Reg. 19737 
(April 13, 2015)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00157-CV

Mark O. Shiver and Angela Shiver, Appellants

v.

Philip J. Meszler; G. Jannin Meszler; Bradford Properties, Inc.; Karen Bailey;

MG Real Estate Services, Inc. d/b/a Amerispec Home Inspection Service

and GMAC Mortgage Corporation, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C2005-0269B, HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Mark O. Shiver and Angela Shiver attempted to appeal a no-evidence summary

judgment issued bythe district court on February 7, 2008, in favor of GMAC Mortgage Corporation.

It appears from the record that this Court lacks jurisdiction because the judgment did not dispose of

all parties and claims before the trial court in the underlying cause. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.,

39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001).

On June 26, 2008, this Court requested that the Shivers file a written response

demonstrating this Court’s jurisdiction over their appeal. To date, no response has been filed.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
2

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 29, 2008