alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Labor force participation rate of women 
by age of youngest child, March 1975-2007


		            Percent		

		     Age of youngest child
		
	age 6 to 17     under 18     under 6     under 3
				
1975	    54.9	  47.4	      39.0	  34.3
1976	    56.2	  48.8	      40.1	  34.1
1977	    58.3	  50.8	      41.2	  35.4
1978	    60.0	  53.0	      44.0	  39.4
1979	    61.6	  54.5	      45.7	  41.1
1980	    64.3	  56.6	      46.8	  41.9
1981	    65.5	  58.1	      48.9	  44.3
1982	    65.8	  58.5	      49.9	  45.6
1983	    66.3	  58.9	      50.5	  46.0
1984	    68.1	  60.5	      52.1	  47.6
1985	    69.9	  62.1	      53.5	  49.5
1986	    70.4	  62.8	      54.4	  50.8
1987	    72.0	  64.7	      56.7	  52.9
1988	    73.3	  65.1	      56.1	  52.4
1989	    74.2	  65.7	      56.7	  52.4
1990	    74.7	  66.7	      58.2	  53.6
1991	    74.4	  66.6	      58.4	  54.5
1992	    75.9	  67.2	      58.0	  54.5
1993	    75.4	  66.9	      57.9	  53.9
1994	    76.0	  68.4	      60.3	  57.1
1995	    76.4	  69.7	      62.3	  58.7
1996	    77.2	  70.2	      62.3	  59.0
1997	    78.1	  72.1	      65.0	  61.8
1998	    78.4	  72.3	      65.2	  62.2
1999	    78.5	  72.1	      64.4	  60.7
2000	    79.0	  72.9	      65.3	  61.0
2001	    79.4	  72.7	      64.4	  60.7
2002	    78.6	  72.2	      64.1	  60.5
2003	    78.7	  71.7	      62.9	  58.7
2004	    77.5	  70.7	      62.2	  57.3
2005	    76.9	  70.5	      62.6	  58.9
2006	    76.9	  70.6	      63.0	  59.9
2007	    77.7	  71.3	      63.5	  60.1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zunicom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Julie  Sansom-Reese,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as enacted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Julie Sansom-Reese
----------------------
Julie Sansom-Reese
Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2003






























                                       30
II 

Calendar No. 47 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 914 

[Report No. 114–24] 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to clarify the use of credentials 

by enrolled agents. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2015 

Mr. HATCH, from the Committee on Finance, reported the following original 

bill; which was read twice and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to clarify the use 

of credentials by enrolled agents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ENROLLED AGENT CRE4 DENTIALS. 

5 Section 330 of title 31, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and 

8 (d) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively, and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 914 PCS

1 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol2 lowing new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(b) Any enrolled agents properly licensed to practice 

4 as required under rules promulgated under subsection (a) 

5 shall be allowed to use the credentials or designation of 

6 ‘enrolled agent’, ‘EA’, or ‘E.A.’.’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 47 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 914 

[Report No. 114–24] 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to clarify 

the use of credentials by enrolled agents. 

APRIL 14, 2015 

Read twice and placed on the calendar 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of OrthoLogic Corp. (the "COMPANY")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Thomas A. Trotter,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Thomas A. Trotter
---------------------------------
Thomas A. Trotter
Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Rex T. Clevenger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Rex T. Clevenger   
|Rex T. Clevenger       
|Senior Vice President &
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 15, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 128 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 128

  Supporting the designation of March 2015, as ``National Colorectal 
                       Cancer Awareness Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 27 (legislative day, March 26), 2015

    Mr. Enzi (for himself and Mr. Menendez) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting the designation of March 2015, as ``National Colorectal 
                       Cancer Awareness Month''.

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men 
        and women combined in the United States;
Whereas in 2015, more than 130,000 individuals in the United States will be 
        diagnosed with colorectal cancer and approximately 50,000 more will die 
        from it;
Whereas colorectal cancer is 1 of the most preventable forms of cancer because 
        screening tests can find polyps that can be removed before becoming 
        cancerous;
Whereas screening tests can detect colorectal cancer early, which is when 
        treatment works best;
Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that if every 
        individual aged 50 or older had regular screening tests, as many as 60 
        percent of deaths from colorectal cancer could be prevented;
Whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized colorectal cancer 
        is 90 percent, but only 39 percent of all diagnoses occur at that stage;
Whereas colorectal cancer screenings can effectively reduce the incidence of 
        colorectal cancer and mortality, but 1 in 3 adults between the ages of 
        50 and 75 are not up to date with recommended colorectal cancer 
        screening;
Whereas public awareness and education campaigns on colorectal cancer 
        prevention, screening, and symptoms are held during the month of March 
        each year; and
Whereas educational efforts can help provide to the public information on 
        methods of prevention and screening, as well as symptoms for early 
        detection: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the designation of March 2015, as ``National 
        Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month'' and the goals and ideals of 
        that Month; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the month with appropriate awareness and educational 
        activities.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1




                     Independent Accountants' Review Report



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
DATATRAK International, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
DATATRAK International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of June 30,
2001, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical review
procedures to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an
audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States, which will be performed for the full year with the objective of
expressing an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of DATATRAK
International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for
the year then ended, not presented herein, and in our report dated February 2,
2001, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000 is fairly stated,
in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from
which it has been derived.



                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Cleveland, Ohio
July 25, 2001
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 24 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 

for the unveiling of the marble bust of Vice President Richard Cheney 

on December 3, 2015. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2015 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. REID) 

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for the unveiling of the marble bust of 

Vice President Richard Cheney on December 3, 2015. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR THE UN4 VEILING OF THE MARBLE BUST OF VICE 

5 PRESIDENT RICHARD CHENEY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

7 Visitor Center is authorized to be used for a ceremony to 

8 unveil the marble bust of Vice President Richard Cheney 

9 on December 3, 2015. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 24 ATS 

1 (b) PREPARATIONS.—The Architect of the Capitol 

2 and the Capitol Police Board shall take such action as 

3 may be necessary with respect to physical preparations 

4 and security for the ceremony described in subsection (a). 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10(e)(e)(e)

 

SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

2005 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

(Amended and restated effective October 1, 2006)

 

The Hewlett-Packard Company 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006, is hereby amended, effective as of the dates specified below, to provide as follows:

 

1.             Effective for deferrals occuring after January 1, 2012, the definition of “Bonus Eligible Employee” in Article I shall be amended to read as follows:

 

“ ‘Bonus Eligible Employee’ means an individual who is an Employee on November 1 preceding the Plan Year within which deferrals are to be made (1) who satisfies both of the following conditions: (i) whose job position has a title of Director (or whose job function is, in the sole and absolute discretion of HP, equivalent to a ‘Director’ position) and (ii) whose Annual Rate of Pay is equal to or greater than the dollar limit for highly compensated employees as defined in Section 414(q)(1)(B)(i) of the Code plus $30,000, or (2) whose job position has a title of Executive Vice President or above, irrespective of such Employee’s Annual Rate of Pay.”

 

2.             Effective January 1, 2012, Section 3.2 shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:

 

“3.2         Outside Director Deferral Elections.  In order to elect to defer a portion of his Annual Retainer earned during a Plan Year, an Outside Director shall submit an irrevocable Deferral Form with HP before the beginning of such Plan Year, but no earlier than the first day of November preceding the Plan Year within which the deferral is to be made.  The portion of his Annual Retainer than an Outside Director elects to defer for a Plan Year shall be stated as a whole dollar amount.  Any failure to make an election shall be deemed to be an election for the same deferral amount and the same distribution date and form of payment for the following Plan Year as were in effect for such Outside Director for the current Plan Year.”

 

This Seventh Amendment to the Hewlett-Packard Company 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby adopted this 16th day of November, 2011.

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Tracy S. Keogh
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Tracy S. Keogh
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Executive Vice President, Human   Resources
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board, September 12, 2017, 1:00 p.m. to September 12, 2017, 4:00 p.m., National Cancer Institute—Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Conference Room TE406 and TE408, Rockville, MD, 20850 (Virtual Meeting) which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 14, 2017, 82 FR 37885.                

The meeting notice is amended to change the times of the open and closed sessions. The open session will end at 2:15 p.m. The closed session will begin at 2:30 p.m. and end at 3:30 p.m. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

Dated: August 30, 2017.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-18804 Filed 9-5-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Health Fitness Corporation;2
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   /s/ Gregg O. LehmanGregg O. LehmanPresident and Chief Executive
Officer November 19, 2007
#### Melissa HOLCOMB *v.*R.F. HOLCOMB

97-972

966 S.W.2d 257

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered April 9, 1998

*Tom F. Donovan,*for appellant.

*Boyce R. Davis,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellee R.J. Holcomb, by and through his attorney Boyce R. Davis, moves for dismissal of the above-captioned appeal from an order entered by the Washington County Probate Court on March 21, 1997, and an order overruling recon*514sideration entered on April 28, 1997. The cause involves the guardianship of two minor children, Ryan Mart Holcomb and Zachary Alexander Holcomb. Appellant Melissa Holcomb, the children’s natural mother, filed notice of this appeal on both May 27, 1997, and again on July 3, 1997.

In support of his motion to dismiss, Appellee states that on January 5, 1998, the parties agreed to a settlement pursuant to a November 12, 1997 hearing. The settlement agreement included, *inter alia,*dismissal of this appeal. Appellee attached the trial court’s January 5, 1998 order to his motion for dismissal. He attached the transcript of the November 12, 1997 hearing to his first amended motion for dismissal filed on March 25, 1998. Appellee alleges that Appellant failed to initiate dismissal of the appeal as stipulated in the agreement between the parties.

Appellant, by and through her attorney Tom F. Donovan, argues that we should deny this motion because Donovan was not a party to the January 5, 1998 agreement, having entered his first appearance for Appellant on March 31, 1997. Attorney James Hornsey, who represented Appellant at the November 12, 1997 hearing, signed the January 5, 1998 agreement for Appellant. In support of her argument to deny the motion for dismissal, Appellant alleges that significant issues of law remain to be decided, and further, that the trial court lost jurisdiction in this case after notice of this appeal was filed, thereby voiding all subsequent orders by the probate court.

We reinvest jurisdiction in the probate court in order for that court to resolve the issue of the January 5, 1998 agreement between the parties. We further remand this case in order for the probate court to resolve the conflicting allegations of the parties and to decide any remaining issues of fact and law. *Gullett v. Gullett,*251 Ark. 497, 473 S.W.2d 180 (1971); *McCluskey v. Kerlen,*4 Ark. App. 334, 631 S.W.2d 18 (1982).

Motion granted; appeal dismissed; case remanded.

Glaze, J., would submit and ask for briefs.
#### Trustin BRATT v. BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY.

Civ. A. No. 27128.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

May 9, 1962.

Eichter, Levy, Lord, Toll & Cavanaugh, by David F. Binder, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Beechwood & Lovitt, by John V. Lovitt, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

WOOD, District Judge.

This is a personal injury suit in which plaintiff, a truck driver employed by Branch Motor Express Company, was seriously injured on November 7, 1957. Plaintiff was driving a tractor-trailer loaded with steel angle irons, or steel channels, when the chain binding the angle irons onto the fiat bed of the trailer snapped and the load shifted, causing the tractor-trailer to go out of control.

On October 9, 1959, plaintiff brought this suit alleging that the tractor-trailer had been loaded by the employees of the defendant acting in the scope of their employment. Defendant’s answer ad*366mitted that the tractor-trailer had been loaded by its employees.

On December 23, 1959, plaintiff filed and served interrogatories upon the defendant asking for the names, addresses, and job classifications of defendant’s employees who loaded the tractor-trailer involved in the accident. These interrogatories were never answered. Plaintiff, apparently relying on the admission of agency contained in the answer, did not seek to have the interrogatories answered by judicial mandate.

On July 1, 1960, counsel who presently represents defendant entered the case. According to defendant’s present counsel, investigations have revealed that the tractor-trailer involved in the accident was not loaded by employees of the defendant, but by employees of the Branch Motor Express Company. Therefore, defendant now seeks to amend its answer so as to deny the allegation of the complaint, previously admitted, that defendant’s employees were responsible for the way in which the steel was loaded.

More than two years and three months have elapsed since the filing of plaintiff’s complaint. Evidence which might have been readily available to plaintiff two years ago has now become unavailable, as records have been destroyed and the memory of witnesses has dimmed. Plaintiff has been lulled into believing that he would not have to produce independent evidence of who loaded the tractor-trailer. If we allowed the amendment now, plaintiff’s case would be seriously prejudiced.

On the other hand, defendant has shown no sufficient excuse for its delay in securing this vital evidence. Its own failure to answer plaintiff’s interrogatories resulted in its failure to apprise itself of the facts about the loading of the tractor-trailer. .The resulting situation is one in which either plaintiff or defendant must suffer. Since defendant is responsible for creating the situation, defendant must bear the burden of the admission of agency as contained in the original answer.

ORDER

And now, to wit, this 9th day of May, 1962, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Amend the Answer is DENIED.