alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 33.2b



|     |  |                                                                                         
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE Atlanta, GA 30339-2210
T 770.763.1000 
www.assurant.corn

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

§1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)

of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD

JANUARY 1, 2015 TO DECEMBER 31, 2015

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the Asserting Party)
is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of
Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all
mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform Transactions). The Asserting Party used the criteria set
forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed
its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the
Platform Transactions.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment
of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period,

American Security Insurance Company

Standard Guaranty Insurance Company

TrackSure
Insurance Agency, Inc.



|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John Frobose                                                                             
|By: John Frobose                                                                             
|President of American Security Insurance Company and Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and

Sr. Vice President of TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.

Date:
February 8, 2016
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

21 TP 12-01403 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS MCFADDEN, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK K. WALSH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H. Dadd, A.J.], entered July 27, 2012) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier III hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the amended petition is dismissed.

Entered: February 1, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
I

## I I 111

### 111 

# iij I I



### STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RANDY A. BROWN NO. 

### 2023 KW 0441

JULY 17, 

### 2023

In Re: 

## Randy A. Brown, 

### applying 

### for 

### supervisory writs, 16th

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

## Mary, No. 

### 2020206243
BEFORE: THERIOT, WOLFE, AND GREENE, JJ.



### WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator 

### failed to 

### include a complete 

### copy of the motion for amendment of sentence, 

### guilty plea and 

### sentencing transcript(s), 

### bill of 

### information, uniform commitment order, pertinent 

### district court minutes, and 

### any other portion of the 

### district court record that might support 

### the claims raised in the writ application. Therefore, this court cannot 

### adequately review the 

### ruling at 

### issue herein. Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application for 

### rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of 

### Louisiana Courts of 

### Appeal, Rules 

### 2-18.7 & 4- 9. In the event 

### relatorelects to file a newapplicationwith this court, 

## hemay do so without the 

### necessity of 

### obtaining a return 

### date. 

## Any future 

## filing on this 

### issue should 

### include the entire contents of this application, 

## the missing items noted above, and a 

### copy 

## ofthis ruling.
MRT EW HG



### URTOFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### PUTYCLERKOFCOURT FORTHE COURT
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40617-40618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10099]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: ``Fragonard: The Fantasy Figures'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Fragonard: The Fantasy Figures,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display 
of the exhibit objects at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, 
District of Columbia, from on or about October 8, 2017, until on or 
about December 3, 2017, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the 
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a7d4c2c4d3cec8c99593929ee7d4d3c6d3c289c0c8d1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e4978187908d8b8ad6d0d1dda49790859081ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. Department 
of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998

[[Page 40618]]

(112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257-1 of December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

 Alyson Grunder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-18029 Filed 8-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at June 30, 2000 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Operations
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2000 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          26,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,714
<PP&E>                                       1,018,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                 760,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 320,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     320,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   320,349
<SALES>                                        136,028
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,483
<CGS>                                           69,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 48,698
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,698
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,698
<EPS-BASIC>                                      15.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    15.22


</TABLE>
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 34 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to defining and delimiting the exemptions for executive, administrative, 

professional, outside sales, and computer employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2016 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. COATS, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. 

COLLINS, Mr. CORKER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. COTTON, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. 

CRUZ, Mr. DAINES, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. ERNST, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. FLAKE, 

Mr. GARDNER, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. HATCH, Mr. HELLER, Mr. HOEVEN, 

Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. LEE, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. 

MORAN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. PAUL, Mr. PERDUE, Mr. RISCH, Mr. 

ROBERTS, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. 

SHELBY, Mr. THUNE, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. VITTER, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. 

SULLIVAN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Labor relating to defining and delimiting the exemptions for executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, and computer employees. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 34 IS 

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De2 partment of Labor relating to defining and delimiting the 

3 exemptions for executive, administrative, professional, out4 side sales, and computer employees under the Fair Labor 

5 Standards Act of 1938 (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 32391 

6 (May 23, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or ef7 fect. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encysive Pharmaceuticals
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Stephen L. Mueller, Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ STEPHEN L. MUELLER
------------------------------------------
Stephen L. Mueller
Vice President, Finance and Administration
Secretary & Treasurer


August 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Encysive
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      12,942,377
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  796,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,471,730
<PP&E>                                       9,685,198
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,485,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,807,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,674,349
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       171,190
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,961,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,807,444
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               516,262
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,697,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,898,236)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,898,236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,898,236)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
2012 Bonus Plan Summary



 EXHIBIT 10.2 

2012 Bonus Plan 

Purpose: 
 The
Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Medivation, Inc. (the “Company”) has established the terms of the 2012 Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) to compensate the
executive officers of the Company for the level of achievement of corporate performance objectives set forth by the Compensation Committee for the 2012 fiscal year, as well as the executive officers’ contributions toward the achievement of
those performance objectives. 
 Determination of 2012 Cash Bonuses: 

Target bonuses for the Company’s executive officers under the Plan will range from 60% to 80% of such executive’s 2012 base
salary. The amount of cash bonuses, if any, for each executive officer will be based on the executive officer and the Company meeting the 2012 corporate performance objectives approved by the Compensation Committee, which include objectives relating
to clinical trial, regulatory activities and milestones, as well as objectives relating to preparation for the potential commercial launch of the Company’s investigational drug MDV3100. The Board and Compensation Committee reserve the right to
modify these goals and criteria at any time or to grant bonuses to the participants even if the performance goals are not met. The target bonuses for the Company’s executive officers for the 2012 fiscal year are as follows: 

 

					
	 Executive Officer
	 	Target Bonus (as
percent of FY 2012 Base
Salary)	 
	 David Hung, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	80	% 
	 Cheryl Cohen
Chief Commercial Officer
	 	 	60	% 
	 C. Patrick Machado
Chief Business Officer and Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	60	% 
	 Lynn Seely, M.D.
Chief Medical Officer
	 	 	60	%
Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Phantom Stock Plan



 Exhibit 10.19 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 STATER BROS. HOLDINGS INC. 
 PHANTOM STOCK PLAN DATED MAY 15, 2006

 (August 21, 2007) 
 Section 5.2 of the Amended and Restated Stater Bros. Holdings Inc. Phantom Stock Plan dated May 15, 2006 (“Phantom Stock Plan”) is hereby amended to read as follows: 

5.2 Cessation of Credits. There shall be no further credits to the account or accounts of a Participant after his or her Termination of Employment
or a Change in Control, except that a Participant shall be entitled to be paid for amounts vested in his or her respective account as specified in Section 6. which shall be payable as provided in Section 7. In case of termination of a
Participant’s employment prior to eligibility for payment as specified in Section 7.1 the vested amount shall earn interest at twelve (12) month Treasury Average Rate from the date of Termination of Employment or a Change in Control
through the payment date. 
 Except as amended herein all other provisions of the Phantom Stock Plan remain in full force and effect.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 23

- 11940 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus QUINTON OLSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:22

- cr
- 00020

- TFM

- N

- 6

____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-11940 Document: 37-1 Date Filed: 02/09/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 11940

Before W ILSON , N EWSOM , and L UCK , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

– 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be en forced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Boyd , 975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th Cir. 2020) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced where “it was clearly conveyed to the defendant that he was giving up his right to appeal under most circ umstances” (quotation marks omitted, alterations adopted, emphasis in original)); United States v. Grinard

Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error). USCA11 Case: 23-11940 Document: 37-1 Date Filed: 02/09/2024 Page: 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Kermit JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-7268.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 24, 2008.

*530Terry Kermit Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terry Kermit Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motions for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appeal-ability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*