alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 881 

To ensure that Federal financial regulators perform a comprehensive review 

of regulations to identify outdated or otherwise unnecessary regulatory 

requirements imposed on financial institutions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Mr. CRAPO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To ensure that Federal financial regulators perform a comprehensive review of regulations to identify outdated or 

otherwise unnecessary regulatory requirements imposed 

on financial institutions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Comprehensive Regu5 latory Review Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 881 IS

1 SEC. 2. ENSURING A COMPREHENSIVE REGULATORY RE2 VIEW. 

3 Section 2222 of the Economic Growth and Regu4 latory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 (12 U.S.C. 3311) 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘each appropriate Federal 

8 banking agency represented on the Council’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘each of the Office of the Comp10 troller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit In11 surance Corporation, the Board of Governors of 

12 the Federal Reserve System, the Bureau of 

13 Consumer Financial Protection, and the Na14 tional Credit Union Administration Board as 

15 the Federal agency representatives on the 

16 Council’’; 

17 (B) by inserting ‘‘, joint or otherwise, and 

18 including all regulations issued pursuant to any 

19 authority provided under the Dodd-Frank Wall 

20 Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 

21 (Public Law 111–203),’’; 

22 (C) by striking ‘‘any such appropriate Fed23 eral banking agency’’ and inserting ‘‘any such 

24 Federal agency’’; and 

25 (D) by striking ‘‘insured depository institu26 tions’’ and inserting ‘‘financial institutions’’; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 881 IS

1 (2) in subsections (b), (c), and (d), by striking 

2 ‘‘the appropriate Federal banking agency’’ each 

3 place that term appears and inserting ‘‘the appro4 priate Federal agency’’; and 

5 (3) in subsection (e)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the ap7 propriate Federal banking agencies’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘the appropriate Federal agencies’’; and 

9 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘the ap10 propriate Federal banking agency’’ and insert11 ing ‘‘the appropriate Federal agency’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of OrthoLogic Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
John M. Holliman, III, Executive Chairman of the Company, and Les M. Taeger,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
November 6, 2008
 
 
 /s/ John M. Holliman,
III
 John M.
Holliman, III
 Executive
Chairman
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
 
 
 /s/ Les M.
Taeger
 Les M.
Taeger
 Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to OrthoLogic Corp. and will be retained by
OrthoLogic Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

 

**SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs**

*PCAOB REGISTERED AUDITORS*

www.sealebeers.com

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the use, in the statement onForm 10-K of PowerMedChairs, of our report dated July 11, 2014 on our audit of the balance sheet of PowerMedChairs as of March31, 2014, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended and frominception on February 22, 2013 through March 31, 2014, and the reference to us under the caption “Experts”.

 

 

***/s/******Seale and Beers, CPAs***

 

Seale and Beers, CPAs

Las Vegas, Nevada

July 15, 2014

 

 

***50S. Jones Blvd, S******uite 201 - Las Vegas, NV 89107 Phone: (888)727-8251 Fax:(888)782-2351***
#### Kamal MATIAN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-77276.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.*

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Lea Greenberger, Attorney at Law, Encino, CA, for Petitioner.

District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, William C. Minick, Esq., Angela N. Liang, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Kamal Matian, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of an order of the *754Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s deportation order, which denied all relief except protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, *Femandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales,*468 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Matian’s sole contention, that he is eligible for relief under former § 212(c), is foreclosed by *Armendariz-Montoya v. Sonchik,*291 F.3d 1116, 1121-22 (9th Cir. 2002) (holding that aliens who “pleaded not guilty and elected a jury trial ... [are] barred from seeking § 212(c) relief’). *See also Saravia-Paguada v.*Gonzales, 488 F.3d 1122, 1131-34 (9th Cir.2007).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1999 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      23,785,362
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,407,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                   176,342
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,228,417
<PP&E>                                       3,875,506
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,626,167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,813,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,658,901
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    49,705,942
<OTHER-SE>                                (22,551,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,813,843
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,179,648
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,649,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,904,228
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                18,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,069,004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,109,004)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,109,004)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.173)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.173)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 971 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 971

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an 
increase in the limit on the length of an agreement under the Medicare 
      independence at home medical practice demonstration program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2015

 Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mr. Markey, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Isakson, and Mr. 
Burr) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                      to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an 
increase in the limit on the length of an agreement under the Medicare 
      independence at home medical practice demonstration program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Independence at Home 
Medical Practice Demonstration Improvement Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN THE LIMIT ON THE LENGTH OF AN AGREEMENT UNDER THE 
              MEDICARE INDEPENDENCE AT HOME MEDICAL PRACTICE 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    Section 1866E(e)(1) (42 U.S.C. 1395cc-5(e)(1)) is amended by 
striking ``3-year'' and inserting ``5-year''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 550 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 550

   To clarify that funding for the standard setting body designated 
pursuant to section 19(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 is not subject 
                           to the sequester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 2015

 Mr. Enzi (for himself and Mr. Murphy) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To clarify that funding for the standard setting body designated 
pursuant to section 19(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 is not subject 
                           to the sequester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION.

    Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) does not apply with respect to the funding 
of the standard setting body designated pursuant to section 19(b) of 
the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77s(b)).
                                 <all>
```
#### Jana Alycia LACY-CURRY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY; Alameda County Superior Court; Lawanda Martin; Reed Seiden, Defendants—Appellees, and City of Oakland, Defendant.

No. 06-15173.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2007 *.

Filed Dec. 26, 2007.

William M. Simpich, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*10Sadhana D. Narayan, The Narayan Law Firm, Burlingame, CA, for DefendantsAppellees.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, COWEN,** and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Robert E. Cowen, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

All of Lacy-Curry’s instant claims relate to a series of state court child dependency proceedings, some of which have concluded and some are still pending. Insofar as state proceedings are ongoing, *Younger*abstention requires dismissal of this action. *See H.C. ex rel. Gordon v. Koppel,*203 F.3d 610, 613 (9th Cir.2000) (dismissing case under *Younger v. Harris,*401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971) where parents sought “wholesale federal intérvention into an ongoing state domestic dispute” involving child custody). However, if state court proceedings have concluded, then the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine precludes our review because Lacy-Curry is clearly a “state-court loser[ ] complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced,” and she is “inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments.” *Exxon-Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Ind. Corp.,*544 U.S. 280, 284, 125 S.Ct. 1517, 161 L.Ed.2d 454 (2005). Lacy-Curry has waived any arguments to the contrary by failing to address these issues on appeal. *Officers for Justice v. Civil Serv. Comm’n,*979 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.1992).

AFFIRMED.

***

 xhis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Larry STEPHENSON *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 98-120

959 S.W.2d 56

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered February 26, 1998

*Lori A. Mosby,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Larry Stephenson, by his attorney Lori A. Mosby, has filed a motion for belated appeal. Mosby admits by motion that the appeal was not timely filed due to a mistake on her part.

*83We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. *See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964 (1979) *(per curiam).*The motion is therefore granted.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.0

Computation of Earnings per Share

The following represents the computation of earnings per share reflecting the
assumption that the granted shares under the option and warrants plan which
would be dilutive will be exercised.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                                   2006           2005
<S>                                                            <C>            <C>
Net earnings applicable to common shareholders, basic          $   563,263    $     627,934
Add:  Dividend to preferred shareholders                            96,410           21,600
Less:  Change in fair value of warrants                           (434,521)              --
                                                               -----------    -------------
Net earnings, diluted                                          $   225,152    $     649,534
                                                               ===========    =============

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic               15,001,832       12,619,603
Common share equivalents relating to:
         Preferred stock                                         3,910,000        2,127,890
         Stock options                                              27,365          707,172
         Warrants                                                  727,744        1,159,857
                                                               -----------    -------------
Weighted average common shares outstanding                      19,666,941       16,614,522
                                                               ===========    =============

Net earnings per share:
         Basic                                                 $      0.04    $        0.05
         Diluted                                               $      0.01    $        0.04

Anti-dilutive preferred stock, stock options and warrants
not included in the diluted earnings per share computations        824,798          277,500
</TABLE>

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 936 

To amend the Ohio & Erie Canal National Heritage Canalway Act of 1996 

to repeal the funding limitation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2015 

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Ohio & Erie Canal National Heritage 

Canalway Act of 1996 to repeal the funding limitation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OHIO & ERIE NATIONAL HERITAGE CANALWAY. 

4 Section 810(a) of the Ohio & Erie National Heritage 

5 Canalway Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333; 110 Stat. 

6 4275; 122 Stat. 826) is amended by striking the second 

7 sentence. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 971 

AN ACT 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for an increase in the limit on the length of an agreement 

under the Medicare independence at home medical practice demonstration program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 971 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Independence 

3 at Home Medical Practice Demonstration Improvement 

4 Act of 2015’’. 

5 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN THE LIMIT ON THE LENGTH OF AN 

6 AGREEMENT UNDER THE MEDICARE INDE7 PENDENCE AT HOME MEDICAL PRACTICE 

8 DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM. 

9 Section 1866E(e)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 1395cc–5(e)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘3-year’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘5-year’’. 

Passed the Senate April 22, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 971 

AN ACT 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to 

program. ence at home medical practice demonstration of an agreement under the Medicare independprovide for an increase in the limit on the length
**Exhibit 31.2**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION      I, Kendall W. Rieman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Croghan Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrolsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usbyothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrolsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
    Date: July 21, 2006 /s/ Kendall W. Rieman     Kendall W. Rieman, Treasurer
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-276897) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2024 Incentive Award Plan and the 2024 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Fractyl Health, Inc. of our report dated April 1, 2024, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Fractyl Health, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2023.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

April 1, 2024

 

 

----