alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

AR/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEOPOLDO NEGRETE HERNANDEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73937

Agency No. A074-790-819

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 11, 2010** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Leopoldo Negrete Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal of

an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of

FILED

JAN 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
AR/Research 2 07-73937

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims

of due process violations in immigration proceedings. Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales,

439 F.3d 614, 620 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

Negrete contends the IJ violated due process by excluding a letter from a

doctor describing the environmental pollution in Ecatepec, Mexico. Contrary to

Negrete’s contention, the proceedings were not “so fundamentally unfair that [he]

was prevented from reasonably presenting his case.” Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d

967, 971 (9th Cir. 2000) (citation omitted). Moreover, Negrete failed to

demonstrate that consideration of the letter may have affected the outcome of the

proceedings. See id. (requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 13.2

Annual Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Avianca Holdings S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2015



By:

/s/ Gerardo GrajalesGerardo GrajalesChief Financial Officer




Section 906 CFO
Certification
Exhibit 32
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation and its
subsidiary.
 /s/  Rick M. Robertson
    
    /s/  Kendall W. RiemanRick M. Robertson, President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)
    Kendall W. Rieman, Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)Date:   October 27, 2010
    
    Date:   October 27, 2010
Exhibit 4.3







	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
*000* Silver Certificate


	
 

	

   NRI SILVER CERTIFICATE NO. ____

	
 

	
NIREK RESOURCES INC.

Silver Certificate

10 grams of Silver

	
     CUSIP: 


	
 


	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
*              *

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
     ISIN: 








	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
1.

	
     For
value received by the undersigned, Nirek Resources Inc. (‘NRI’), or any of
its successors, the holder of this silver certificate (this “Silver
Certificate”), ______________________ (the “Holder”), is entitled to ten (10)
grams of silver. This Silver Certificate is to be redeemed by the Holder on March 31, 2016 at
Heritage Transfer Agency Inc. (“Depository”) at 4 King Street West Suite
1320, Toronto, ON M5H 1B6.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
2.

	
The Holder is entitled to
ten (10) grams of silver.


	
 

	
3.

	
Nothing contained in this
Silver Certificate shall be construed as conferring upon the Holder any right
or interest whatsoever in NRI or any other right or interest except as herein
expressly provided.


	
 

	
4.

	
The Holders will be
notified by NRI, via mail, prior to March 31, 2016 of his or her approaching
ability to redeem this Silver Certificate.


	
 

	
5.

	
This Silver Certificate
shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province
of Ontario, Canada.


	
 

	
6.

	
This Silver Certificate
may be assigned or transferred by the Holder or its nominee. 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, NRI has caused this Silver Certificate to be
executed by a duly authorized officer.


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
December 21, 2011

	
NIREK RESOURCES INC.


	
 

	
 


	
Countersigned and
Registered

	
Per:


	
 

	
 


	
Heritage Transfer Agency Inc.

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
Transfer Agent and Registrar

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
   By:
<TABLE>

                            HAMPSHIRE GROUP, LIMITED
                   STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>
                                         Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
                                        -------------------- -------------------
                                        June 27,    June 28,  June 27,  June 28,
                                          1998       1997      1998      1997
                                        ---------  --------- --------- ---------
                                             (unaudited)         (unaudited)
<S>                                       <C>        <C>        <C>      <C>
Weighted average number of common 
  and common equivalent shares 
  outstanding                             4,137      3,851      4,122    3,858
                                          =====      =====      =====    =====
Net loss                                  ($800)     ($235)   ($1,958)   ($496)

Less - preferred dividend requirements       -         (42)        -       (86)
                                          -----      ------    ------    ------
Net loss applicable to common stock       ($800)     ($277)   ($1,958)   ($582)
                                          =====      ======    ======    ======
Net loss per share applicable to 
  common stock                           ($0.19)    ($0.07)    ($0.48)  ($0.15)
                                          =====      ======    ======    ======
                             
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
            Section 1350 Certification -- Principal Financial Officer

                 Citizens Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries



                In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citizens
Financial  Corporation  (the "Company") for the quarterly  period ended June 30,
2004, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report")  I, Len E.  Schweitzer,  Vice  President  and  Treasurer  of the
Company,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  s.s. 1350, as adopted pursuant to s.s.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

                1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                          and

                2.    The  information contained  in the Report fairly presents,
                          in all material respects,  the financial condition and
                          results of operations of the Company.


                                          By:       /s/ Len E. Schweitzer
                                                    ----------------------------

                                                    Vice President and Treasurer

Date: August 11, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Citizens Financial Corporation and
will be retained by CFC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be  considered  filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 43 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 43

Supporting the bid of Los Angeles, California, to bring the 2024 Summer 
Olympic Games back to the United States and pledging the cooperation of 
                   Congress with respect to that bid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2016

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Isakson, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Bennet, Mr. 
  Thune, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Gardner, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Blumenthal) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
         the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the bid of Los Angeles, California, to bring the 2024 Summer 
Olympic Games back to the United States and pledging the cooperation of 
                   Congress with respect to that bid.

Whereas the International Olympic Committee will meet on September 13, 2017, in 
        Lima, Peru, to consider a site for the Summer Olympic and Paralympic 
        Games (in this preamble referred to as the ``Games'') in 2024;
Whereas the United States Olympic Committee has selected Los Angeles, 
        California, as the candidate of the United States for the 2024 Games;
Whereas the Games further the cause of world peace and understanding;
Whereas the country that hosts the Games performs an act of international 
        goodwill;
Whereas the Games have not been held in the United States since 1996;
Whereas many of the world-class venues to be used in Los Angeles' 2024 plan for 
        the Games are already built or are planned as permanent facilities; and
Whereas Los Angeles is positioned to deliver an innovative, fiscally 
        responsible, and sustainable Games: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) advises the International Olympic Committee that the 
        United States would welcome the holding of the 2024 Summer 
        Olympic and Paralympic Games in Los Angeles, California, the 
        site designated by the United States Olympic Committee;
            (2) expresses the sincere hope that the United States will 
        be selected as the site for the 2024 Summer Olympic and 
        Paralympic Games and pledges cooperation and support toward the 
        successful fulfillment of those Games in the highest sense of 
        the Olympic tradition; and
            (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of the Senate 
        transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the United 
        States Olympic Committee and to the International Olympic 
        Committee.
                                 <all>
```
Form of Transaction Bonus Amendment



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSACTION BONUS AGREEMENT 
 AMENDMENT made as of
December 15, 2011 to the Transaction Bonus Agreement dated as of March 31, 2011 between Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
and                         (the “Executive”) (each a “Party,” and collectively, the “Parties”).

 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Transaction Bonus Agreement as set forth herein; 

NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the date hereof: 
 1. Section 1(a)(iii) shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 (iii) the Closing
of a Transaction occurring on or prior to March 31, 2013 (the “Outside Closing Date”). 
 2. The second
sentence of Section 2 shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 Any reduction of the Parachute Payments pursuant to the
foregoing shall occur in the following order: (1) any cash severance payable by reference to the Executive’s base salary and annual bonus, the last months of which shall be reduced first until the necessary reduced amount has been
achieved; (2) any cash payment under this Agreement; (3) any other cash amount payable to the Executive; (4) any benefit valued as a “parachute payment” (within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code); and
(5) acceleration of vesting of any equity award. 
 3. Except as set forth in this Amendment, all of the other provisions
of the Transaction Bonus Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this
Amendment as of the date first above written. 








			
	MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Name:
		 	Title:
	
	EXECUTIVE
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Name:
		 	Title:

 Signature Page
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                      208,191
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            223,807
<PP&E>                                    1,143,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,367,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           556
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     13,879
<OTHER-SE>                                1,968,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,367,143
<SALES>                                       5,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              5,483
<CGS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            103,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               103,369
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (97,886)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1

                          AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE

     This Amendment to Promissory Note (the "Amendment") is made December 9,
2011, by and between Domark International,Inc. (the "Company") and Infinite
Funding, Inc.(the "Holder").

     WHEREAS, on September 28, 2011, the Company entered into a Promissory Note
(the "September 2011 Note"), a copy of which is attached hereto, in the
aggregate amount of $40,000;

     WHEREAS, pursuant to its terms, the September 2011 Note is due on or before
December 15, 2011;

     WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, the Company has not made payments on the
Note;

     WHEREAS, on December 9, 2011, the Company and Holder agreed to amend
certain provisions of the Note;

     NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

     1.   EXTENSION OF DUE DATE OF NOTE. The Parties agree that the Due Date of
          the Note shall be extended to April 15, 2012.

     2.   EXTENSION FEE. The Parties agree that a fee in the amount of $10,000
          will be added to the principal balance yof the loan in consideration
          for the extension granted herein.

     3.   PRINCIPAL BALANCE. Upon signing of this Amendment, the aggregate
          principal balance due under the September 2011 Note shall be $50,000.

     4.   EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Agreement shall be December
          9, 2011. All other provisions of the Note and of the Amendment remain
          in force.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Holder hereby execute this
Agreement as of the date first written above.

DOMARK INTERNATIONAL INC.                     INFINITE FUNDING, INC.


By: /s/ R. Thomas Kidd                        /s/ Alina Yurovskay
    --------------------------------          ----------------------------------
    R. Thomas Kidd                            Alina Yurovskay
    Chairman                                  President

GUARANTOR


By: /s/ R. Thomas Kidd
    --------------------------------
    R. Thomas Kidd
    An Induvidual
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF  PRECISION  SYSTEMS,  INC.  FOR THE NINE MONTHS  ENDED
SEPTEMBER  30,  1997,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1

               
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       6,722,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,455,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                   723,601
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,082,344
<PP&E>                                      34,598,085
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,114,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,920,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,378,483
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        145
<COMMON>                                       178,311
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,107,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,920,971
<SALES>                                      8,191,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,462,000
<CGS>                                       11,580,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,580,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,476,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,573,961)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,573,961)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,573,961)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.32)
        

        

</TABLE>
(logo)**Prudential**

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PrudentialMortgage Capital Company

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

RE:**WFRBS 2013-C14**

Period:**January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017(the "Reporting Period")**

 

**Annual ComplianceStatement**

 

I,Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity as President and Managing Director ofPrudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify withregard to the Company's role as Sub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement,(the "Agreement") dated as of June 1,2013, pertaining to theabove-referenced certificates, that:

 

(i) a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the periodnoted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement duringthe reporting period has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilledall its obligations under the Agreement throughout the reporting period, and

 

(iii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilledits obligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

(iv) the Company has maintained an effective internal control system over theservicing of mortgage loans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

(v) the Company has not received any notice regarding qualification, or challengingthe status of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from theIRS or any other governmental agency or body.

 

 

Effectiveas of 2/22/2018

 

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond WALKER, a/k/a Raymond Walker, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-4098.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 10, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 31, 2008.

Albert P. Shahid, Jr., Shahid Law Office, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Reginald I. Lloyd, United States Attorney, Alston C. Badger, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Raymond Walker pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(D) (2000), and using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of, a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c)(1)(A) (West Supp.2007). The district eoui-t sentenced Walker to ninety months in prison. Walker timely appealed.

Walker first contends that the district court exi'ed in accepting his guilty plea. Because Walker did not seek to withdraw his guilty plea in the distx’ict court and points to no eirors in the Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 heax'ing, we find that the district court did not plaixxly err in accepting his guilty plea. *United States v. Martinez,*277 F.3d 517, 525 (4th Cir.2002) (providing standard).

In addition, Walker argues that the district court erred by failing to downwax-dly depart from the guideline range pursuant to *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 5K2.13 (2005), based on his diminished capacity. A district court’s failure to grant a downward depax-ture is not reviewable unless the court was under the mistaken impression that it lacked the authoxity to depai't. *United States v. Matthews,*209 F.3d 338, 352 (4th Cir.2000); *see also United States v. Cooper,*437 F.3d 324, 333 (3d Cir.2006) (collecting cases declining to review district court’s decision not to depart, even after *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)). Because Walker did not request a departure, the district court did not consider a departure based on his diminished capacity and thus did not make any decisions concerning its authoxity to depai't on that ground. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the distinct court’s failure to depart sua sponte.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the distinct coui’t. We dispense with oi'al ax'gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and ax-gument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*