alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
NINE WEST GROUP INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF NOVEMBER 1,
1997, AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED
NOVEMBER 1, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                          29,089
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    554,393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               830,895
<PP&E>                                         253,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                (85,808)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,409,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          218,172
<BONDS>                                        686,834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           359
<OTHER-SE>                                     444,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,409,352
<SALES>                                      1,398,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,398,330
<CGS>                                          788,432
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  788,432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               436,752
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                133,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,345
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,019
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,019
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.18
        

</TABLE>
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 20 

Relating to the approval of the proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between 

the United States of America and the Government of the Republic 

of Korea Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2015 

Mr. CARDIN (by request) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the approval of the proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between the United States of America and 

the Government of the Republic of Korea Concerning 

Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress does favor the proposed agreement for 

4 cooperation transmitted to the Congress by the President 

5 on June 16, 2015. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40145

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDWIN ROGELIO AMAYA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:17-CR-1577-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edwin Rogelio 

Amaya has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Amaya has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 17, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40145 Document: 00514685511 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/17/2018
No. 18-40145

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40145 Document: 00514685511 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/17/2018
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9034-9]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564-7146 or                     *http://www.epa.gov/​nepa*.                

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)

Filed 08/21/2017 Through 08/25/2017

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *http://www.epa.gov/​compliance/​nepa/​eisdata.html*.                

*EIS No. 20170165, Final, USFS, CA,*                    Power Fire Reforestation, Review Period Ends: 10/02/2017, Contact: Marc Young 209-295-5955                

*EIS No. 20170166, Draft, BLM, NV,*                    Greater Phoenix Project, Comment Period Ends: 10/16/2017, Contact: Christine Gabriel 775-635-4000                

*EIS No. 20170167, Final, DOC, CO,*                    Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network for the Central United States, Review Period Ends: 10/02/2017, Contact: Amanda Pereira 202-280-9364                

*EIS No. 20170168, Draft, Caltrans, CA,*                    North County Corridor New State Route 108 Project and Route Adoption, Comment Period Ends: 10/16/2017, Contact: Juan Torres 559-445-6328                

*EIS No. 20170169, Draft, USACE, AK,*                    Nanushuk Project, Comment Period Ends: 10/16/2017, Contact: Ellen Lyons 907-474-2169                

*EIS No. 20170170, Draft, USACE, TX,*                    Houston Ship Channel Expansion Channel Improvement Project, Comment Period Ends: 10/16/2017, Contact: Kelly Burks-Copes 409-766-3044                

*EIS No. 20170171, Draft, FTA, CA,*                    East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor, Comment Period Ends: 10/16/2017, Contact: Candice Hughes 213-629-8613                 

Dated: August 28, 2017.

Dawn Roberts,

Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2017-18604 Filed 8-31-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Lexter Kossie#700661 William McConnell Unit 

### 3001 South Emily Drive Beeville, Texas 78102 

### April 26, 2015
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 

### P.O. BOX 12308, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711
RE: WR NOs. 10,978-01 thru 10,978-16 Tr.Ct.NOs. 679887-A thru 679887-K 

### 185thDistrict Court - Harris County 

# tofl%-0\l07l03,.0*7,06^-3

CMidtncr*o'«.-1^77-^s3^ 

# APR292015

Dear Clerk: Recently Ihave been cited for abuse of the writ. In 

### order for me to show that the claims I intend to raise in my 

### subsequent writ are not barred by Sec 4 I am requesting the docket sheet of all the writs mentioned above with a list of all of the claims presented in each of those application. With out a list of all of the claims I cannot show that the claims 

### I intend to raise have not been raised before in those prior applications. 

### Thankyou for any consideration given in this matter.

cc:File Sincerely, 

# ^ZZ&'fl&^L^ Lexfcli? Kennon Kossie
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 34 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.34
                                        Agreed to March 23, 2016        

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on any legislative day from Wednesday, 
March 23, 2016, through Friday, April 8, 2016, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until 3:30 p.m. on Monday, April 11, 2016, 
or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the House 
to reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if, in his 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836



| | Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2013-CCRE7 Commercial Mortgage Pass- Through Certificates
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of April 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate
Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting
Period"):



(a)
A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under
such officer's supervision; and



(b)
To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted in Schedule A.







February 10, 2017




























To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation



Schedule A



Material Instances of Non-Compliance



List of Exemptions for COMM 2013-CCRE7 Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates

The September 12, 2016 distribution (the "September
Distribution") due to holders of certificates of the COMM 2013-CCRE7 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, was made
one business day late on September 13, 2016 by Wells Fargo. The inadvertent delay in the required distribution, consisting of approximately
$25.117 million, was due to a payment systems error that occurred in connection with a recent conversion to a new payment system.
The payments were disbursed the following day to holders. The impact of this error was limited to the September Distribution.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                     COLTEC INDUSTRIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            PARENTS AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                DECEMBER 31, 1995

     Set forth below is a list of Coltec's principal subsidiaries.  All such
subsidiaries are consolidated in Coltec's Consolidated Financial Statements.

                                                  Percentage of
                                   State or     Voting Securities
                                  Jurisdiction    Owned by its
Name                            Where Organized  Immediate Parent
----                            ---------------  ----------------

CII Holdings Inc ................. Delaware            100
Coltec Aerospace Canada Ltd. ..... Canada               89*
Coltec Automotive Inc ............ Delaware            100
Coltec Canada Inc ................ Delaware            100
Coltec (Great Britain) Limited ... United Kingdom      100
Coltec Holdings Inc .............. Delaware            100
Coltec Industrial Products Inc ... Delaware            100
Delavan-Delta, Inc................ Tennessee           100
Delavan Inc ...................... Iowa                100
Delavan Limited................... United Kingdom      100
Farnam Sealing Systems Inc ....... Delaware            100
Garlock Bearings Inc. ............ Delaware             80
Garlock de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.... Mexico               65.7
Garlock GmbH ..................... Germany             100
Garlock (Great Britain) Ltd. ..... United Kingdom      100
Garlock Inc ...................... Ohio                100
Garlock of Canada Ltd. ........... Ontario, Canada     100
Garlock Overseas Corporation ..... Delaware            100
Garlock Pty. Limited ............. Australia            80
Garlock, S.A. .................... Panama              100
Holley Automotive Group Limited .. United Kingdom      100
Holley Automotive Inc ............ Delaware            100
Holley Automotive Systems GmbH ... Germany             100
Holley Performance Products Inc .. Delaware            100
Liard S.A. ....................... France              100
Louis Mulas, Sucs., S.A. de C.V... Mexico               65.7
Stemco Inc ....................... Texas               100
The Anchor Packing Company ....... Delaware            100
Walbar Inc .......................  Delaware           100

   *11% owned by another subsidiary


<PAGE>

     The names of certain other subsidiaries of Coltec have been omitted from
the list above because such unnamed subsidiaries considered in the aggregate as
a single subsidiary would not constitute a significant subsidiary.
Form of Employment Agreement Amendment



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 AMENDMENT made as of
December 15, 2011 to the Employment Agreement dated as of January         , 2011 between Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”) and
                     (the “Executive”) (each a “Party,” and collectively, the “Parties”). 

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein; 

NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the date hereof: 
 1. Section 5.2 shall be amended and the following provision shall be added as follows: 
 (e)
notwithstanding Section 4.2 of this Agreement, the Bonus earned but unpaid as of the termination date for any previously completed fiscal year of the Company (based on the achievement of the performance targets established by the Board and the
Company’s Compensation Committee with respect to such previously completed fiscal year; provided that, for fiscal year 2011, such Bonus shall be calculated as follows: (i) if the Company achieved Consolidated EBITDA of $29,081,250,
including the Company’s bonus accrual of $1,378,869, or higher, 100% of the Bonus shall be paid, (ii) if the Company achieved Consolidated EBITDA of between $29,081,250 and $27,702,381 (the “Minimum Consolidated EBITDA
Target”), including the Company’s bonus accrual of $1,378,869, then the bonus accrual of the Company and the bonus payout to all eligible employees of the Company shall be reduced so that the Consolidated EBITDA equals $29,081,250
(e.g., if Consolidated EBITDA is $28,081,250, including the Company’s bonus accrual of $1,378,869, then the Company’s bonus accrual and the bonus payout shall be reduced by $1 million and the remaining $378,869 of the Company’s
bonus accrual shall be distributed pro rata to the Company’s eligible employees) and (iii) if Consolidated EBITDA is less than the Minimum Consolidated EBITDA Target, then no Bonus shall be payable for fiscal year 2011. “Consolidated
EBITDA” shall be calculated in a manner consistent with the manner in which Consolidated EBITDA has been calculated and presented by the Company management to the Company’s Board of Directors in prior fiscal years for purposes of
determining bonus entitlement and incorporating the same methodology for including or excluding adjustments as is consistent with prior fiscal years. The payment of such Bonus under this Section 5.2(e) shall be payable to the Executive within
thirty (30) days following the Company’s receipt of the Company’s audited financial statements for such fiscal year, but in no event earlier than sixty (60) days following the Executive’s termination of employment and no
later than June 30 of the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the Bonus was earned. 
 2. Except as set forth in
this Amendment, all of the other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 








			
	MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Name:
		 	Title:
	
	EXECUTIVE
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Name:
		 	Title:

 Signature Page
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board, International Trade Administration, Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Administration, with the concurrence of the General Services Administration, renewed the Charter for the United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board on August 17, 2017.

# DATES:

The Charter for the United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board was renewed on August 17, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Brian Beall, the United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board, Room 10003, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20230, telephone: 202-482-5634, email:                         *Brian.Beall@trade.gov.*

      ( print page 42073)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Administration, with the concurrence of the General Services Administration, renewed the United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board on August 17, 2017. This Notice is published in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Title 5, United States Code, Appendix 2, section 9). It has been determined that the Committee is necessary and in the public interest. The Committee was established pursuant to Commerce's authority under 15 U.S.C. 1512, established under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), as amended, 5 U.S.C., App. and with the concurrence of the General Services Administration. The Committee provides advice to the Secretary on government policies and programs that affect the U.S. travel and tourism industry.

 Dated: August 28, 2017.

Brian Beall,

Designated Federal Officer, United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board.

[FR Doc. 2017-18820 Filed 9-5-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1985

In re: JOEY LAMONT BRUNSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. (3:14-cr-00604-JFA-18)

Submitted: October 19, 2023 Decided: October 23, 2023

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joey Lamont Brunson, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1985 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Joey Lamont Brunson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district 

court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from 

this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals 

that the district court recently granted the Government’s motion for summary judgment 

and denied Brunson relief on his § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court 

has recently decided Brunson’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. To the 

extent that Brunson seeks recusal of the district court judge in this mandamus petition, we 

conclude that Brunson’s conclusory assertions of bias are insufficient to warrant recusal. 

See Belue v. Leventhal, 640 F.3d 567, 572-73 (4th Cir. 2011). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1985 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Eon. B. T. Walter8 

County Auditor 

Smlth.County 

Tyler, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Opinion No. ORet Does Art. 

oonuuiesione 

Thle Depa 

your request 

ved and oonsldemd 

ate stated questions. 

8 Department, written 

tornby Oeneral, 

inal Mstrlot Attorpaears upon the above 

h a oopy of Opinion 

ii36d~CiVil atatutse oi Temm, 

Ia@, ie a psrmisrive statute 

The aotioa of the oomliaation $0 made 

The 0ommie~loner6* flourt*s action 

subjsot to review. 

on No. O-1500 also defines the tern *paupsF. 

sting that this eatfsfaotorily answera your 

inquiry, end w%th bestwgardm, we ara 

Very truly your8