alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 33.7



|     |  |                         |  |                                                               
|---- |  | ----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | NATIONAL TAX SEARCH,LLC |  | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60601 (312)
233-6440

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2014, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank(the
Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period
from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR). NTS has used the
servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (1)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii),
1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of
the Servicer using NTSs TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the
assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/ Lori D. Eshoo           
|Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
|January 12, 2015
<PAGE>

                     COLTEC INDUSTRIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Year Ended December 31, 1998
                                                  -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       1998         1997        1996         1995        1994
                                                  -------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>
Earnings from continuing
  operations before
  extraordinary item...................               122,293      94,874      54,570       34,521      48,446
Add (deduct)
  Income taxes:
    Federal and Foreign..............                  64,898      48,875      28,111       17,615      27,251
    State and local.....................                7,601       6,241       5,121        2,601       2,105
Portion of rents representative
    of interest factor (1)...............               3,023       2,983       3,321        2,868       3,979
Interest Expense......................                 59,954      54,613      76,182       91,208      90,337
                                                  -------------------------------------------------------------



Earnings from continuing
  operations before
  extraordinary item,
  as adjusted............................             257,769     207,586     167,305      148,813     172,118
                                                  =============================================================


Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense.....................                59,954      54,613      76,182       91,208      90,337
  Capitalized interest.................                 1,585       1,455       1,139          997         689
  Portion of rents representative
    of interest factor (1)...............               3,023       2,983       3,321        2,868       2,979
                                                  -------------------------------------------------------------


Fixed charges..........................                64,562      59,051      80,642       95,073      94,005
                                                  =============================================================


Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges..........................                 4.0         3.5         2.1          1.6         1.8
                                                  =============================================================

</TABLE>


Note:

(1) Estimated to be 1/3 of total rent expenses.
----

| Name of Subsidiary      |   | Jurisdiction |   | Ownership Interest |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                              |   |         |   |                    |
| Evofuel Ltd.                      |   | Israel       |   | 100%                    |
| Evogene Inc.                      |   | Delaware     |   | 100%                    |
| Leviev-Evogene Namibia (PTY) Ltd. |   | Namibia      |   | 100%                    |
| Biomica Ltd.                      |   | Israel       |   | 100%                    |

----
#### Didar SINGH, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-76372.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 2007.*

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Hardeep Singh Rai, Esq., Tsz-Hai Huang, Rai & Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Karin J. Immergut, Esq., USPO— Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, John R. Cunningham, Esq., Luis E. Perez, Esq., Washington, DC, David L. Atkinson, United States Attorney’s Office, Portland, OR, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Didar Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), on the ground that Singh was not credible. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand.

An intervening change in law requires us to remand because the credibility finding was based on the asylum officer’s Assessment to Refer memorandum (“Assessment”). In *Jarnail Singh v. Gonzales,*403 F.3d 1081, 1085-90 (9th Cir.2005), we held that an Assessment cannot, in certain circumstances, support an adverse credibility finding. Here, as in *Jamail Singh,*there were no contemporaneous notes from the asylum officer, no transcript of the interview, no evidence that petitioner’s statements during the interview were made under oath, the asylum officer did not testify, and petitioner was not provided with *756an opportunity to review the Assessment, which the record indicates petitioner’s counsel first received at the hearing before the IJ. Because the agency did not have the benefit of our decision in *Jwniail Singh*at the time it addressed the issue, we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings consistent with *Jarnail Singh.*

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                 Citizens Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


                In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citizens
Financial   Corporation   (the  "Company")  for  the   quarterly  period   ended
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the
date  hereof (the "Report") I, Darrell R. Wells,  Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. s.s. 1350, as adopted pursuant to s.s.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                 By:       /s/ Darrell R. Wells
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Darrell R. Wells
                                           Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 14, 2003
img239154754_0.jpg
     780 Township Line Road  Yardley, PA 19067609-883-3900


Re: Servicer Compliance Statement

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (“the Servicer”) pursuant to applicable servicing agreements governing the securities listed in Exhibit A, does certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer’s activities during the period of 1/1/2023 to 12/31/2023 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Servicer’s performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision; and


2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


The undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 5th day of March 2024.

img239154754_1.jpg

David C. Schneider President

Cenlar FSB

Mailing Address:Cenlar FSB  425 Phillips Boulevard  Ewing, NJ 08618


---

img239154754_2.jpg








Exhibit A – Securities Covered in Cenlar’s Servicer Compliance Statement



|         |                                      |             |                                    |                       
|-------- | ------------------------------------ | ----------- | ---------------------------------- | ----------------------
|Investor | Servicer                             | Security    | * Period Subserviced by Cenlar FSB | Security Administrator
|RW0      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2012-6 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW2      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-2 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW3      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-3 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW4      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-4 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW5      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-5 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW6      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-6 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW7      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-7 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW8      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-8 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              






---
EXHIBIT 11

           COMMERCE GROUP CORP. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
           --------------------------------------------------

             SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


                                           Years Ended March 31

                                                                   2007
                                      2009          2008       (Restated)
                                  ------------  ------------  ------------
BASIC/DILUTED
-------------

Net income (loss) for primary
 income per common share          $(30,016,783)  $(3,052,198)  $(2,616,821)
                                  =============  ============  ============

Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding
 during the year - basic/diluted    30,723,711    28,401,086    25,457,052
                                  =============  ============  ============
Income (loss) per common
 share - basic/diluted            $      (.98)  $      (.11)  $      (.10)
                                  =============  ============  ============
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41526-41527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18618]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0025; FRL-9967-29-Region 1]


Air Plan Approval; Rhode Island; Reasonably Available Control 
Technology for US Watercraft, LLC; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an adverse comment, the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) is withdrawing the July 3, 2017, direct final 
rule approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by 
the State of Rhode Island. The revision consists of a reasonably 
available control technology (RACT) approval for a volatile organic 
compound (VOC) emission source in Rhode Island, specifically, US 
Watercraft, LLC. This action is being taken in accordance with the 
Clean Air Act.

DATES: The direct final rule published on July 3, 2017 (82 FR 30747), 
is withdrawn effective September 1, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David L. Mackintosh, Air Quality 
Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England 
Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail Code OEP05-2), 
Boston, MA 02109-3912, tel. 617-918-1584, email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fb969a989092958f948893d59f9a8d929fbb9e8b9ad59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7aaa6a4acaea9b3a8b4afe9a3a6b1aea387a2b7a6e9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the direct final rule, EPA stated that if 
adverse comments were submitted by August 2, 2017, the rule would be 
withdrawn and not take effect. EPA received an adverse comment prior to 
the close of the comment period and, therefore, is withdrawing the 
direct final rule. EPA will address the comment in

[[Page 41527]]

a subsequent final action based upon the proposed rule also published 
on July 3, 2017 (82 FR 30815). EPA will not institute a second comment 
period on this action.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: August 10, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
Accordingly, the amendments to 40 CFR 52.2070 published in the Federal 
Register on July 3, 2017 (82 FR 30747) on page 30749 are withdrawn 
effective September 1, 2017.

[FR Doc. 2017-18618 Filed 8-31-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.2

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
DATATRAK International, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-16061 and 333-26251) pertaining to the Collaborative
Clinical Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Share Incentive Plan,
Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Directors' Share
Option Plan, Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1996
Outside Directors Stock Option Plan and the Collaborative Clinical Research,
Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Key Employees and Consultants Stock Option Plan
and the DATATRAK International, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated
April 20, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of DATATRAK
International, Inc. (formerly, Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc.) and
subsidiaries that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2000.

                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
April 20, 2000
EXHIBIT 11.0
   Three Months EndedMarch 312009
    
    
    2008Net earnings applicable to common shareholders  basic & diluted
    
    $
    1,003,188
    
    
    $
    324,712Weighted average common shares outstanding  basic
    
    
    9,666,876
    
    
    
    10,040,374Common share equivalents relating to: stock options, warrants
and preferred stockStock options
    
    
    26,165
    
    
    
    146,327Warrants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    19,531Restricted stock
    
    
    321,582
    
    
    
    Weighted average common shares outstanding
    
    
    10,014,623
    
    
    
    10,206,232Net Earnings Per Share:Basic
    
    $
    0.10
    
    
    $
    0.03Diluted
    
    $
    0.10
    
    
    $
    0.03Anti-dilutive options and warrants not included in diluted
earnings per share computations
    
    
    1,812,516
    
    
    
    654,000
EXHIBIT 12.1
 
     
   1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Evogene Ltd.;
  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the company and have:
  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Ofer Haviv
   
 28
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.2

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
DATATRAK International, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-16061, 333-26251 and 333-90699) pertaining to the
Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Share Incentive
Plan, Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Directors'
Share Option Plan, Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc. Amended and Restated
1996 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan and the Collaborative Clinical
Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Key Employees and Consultants Stock
Option Plan and the DATATRAK International, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan of our
reports dated April 20, 2000, July 19, 2000 and October 23, 2000 relating to the
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of DATATRAK
International, Inc. (formerly, Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc.) and
subsidiaries that are included in its Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended March
31, 2000, June 30, 2000 and September 30, 2000.

                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
October 23, 2000