alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 521 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 

study of President Station in Baltimore, Maryland, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study of President Station in Baltimore, 

Maryland, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘President Street Sta5 tion Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 521 IS

1 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

2 means the President Street Station, a railroad ter3 minal in Baltimore, Maryland, the history of which 

4 is tied to the growth of the railroad industry in the 

5 19th century, the Civil War, the Underground Rail6 road, and the immigrant influx of the early 20th 

7 century. 

8 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

9 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a special 

10 resource study of the study area. 

11 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub12 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

13 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

14 study area; 

15 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

16 designating the study area as a unit of the National 

17 Park System; 

18 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

19 protection, and interpretation of the study area by 

20 the Federal Government, State or local government 

21 entities, or private and nonprofit organizations; 

22 (4) consult with interested Federal agencies, 

23 State or local governmental entities, private and 

24 nonprofit organizations, or any other interested indi25 viduals; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 521 IS

1 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac2 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

3 maintenance associated with the alternatives. 

4 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

5 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec6 tion 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5). 

7 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

8 on which funds are first made available for the study 

9 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

10 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep11 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

12 Resources of the Senate a report that describes— 

13 (1) the results of the study; and 

14 (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the 

15 Secretary. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 776 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve access to 

medication therapy management under part D of the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2015 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. KIRK, and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve 

access to medication therapy management under part 

D of the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medication Therapy 

5 Management Empowerment Act of 2015’’. 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 776 IS

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVED ACCESS TO MEDICATION THERAPY MAN2 AGEMENT UNDER PART D OF THE MEDICARE 

3 PROGRAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–4(c)(2)(A)(ii)(I) 

5 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w– 

6 104(c)(2)(A)(ii)(I)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or have a 

7 single chronic disease of cardiovascular disease, chronic 

8 obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, or diabe9 tes’’ before the semicolon at the end. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply to plan years beginning on or 

12 after January 1, 2016. 

Æ 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Percent of wives who earn more than their husbands 
(families where both have earnings), 1987-2006

	
       Percent

87	17.8
88	18.1
89	18.8
90	19.2
91	20.9
92	22.3
93	22.3
94	22.5
95	22.0
96	22.7
97	22.7
98	22.7
99	22.3
00	23.3
01	24.1
02	25.0
03	25.2
04	25.3
05	25.5
06	25.7
Exhibit 32

                        GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Form 10-QSB of Global  Entertainment
Corporation  (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ending February 29, 2004, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Quarterly   Report"),   the  undersigned  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief
Accounting  Officer of the Company  each hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      2.    The information  contained in the Quarterly  Report fairly presents,
            in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Dated April 14, 2004


/s/ Richard Kozuback
----------------------------
Richard Kozbuack
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Philip Lajoie
----------------------------
Philip Lajoie
Chief Accounting Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DONALD OLSON AND 6 BITS, INC.,

 Respondents

 v.

JOHN F. SAYERS, IV AND K.S.A.

VENDING, INC.,

 Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 835 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-26-2017]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 80--San Antonio, Texas; Authorization of 
Production Activity; DPT Laboratories, Ltd. (Pharmaceutical Products); 
San Antonio, Texas

    On April 17, 2017, DPT Laboratories, Ltd., submitted a notification 
of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board within Subzone 80F, in 
San Antonio, Texas.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (82 FR 26434, June 7, 2017). On August 
15, 2017, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that 
no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: August 24, 2017.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-18436 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1997 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.    
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      34,452,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,116,692
<ALLOWANCES>                                   311,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,406,429
<PP&E>                                       3,269,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                 710,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,009,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,188,902
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                    49,689,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (869,058)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,009,051
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,037,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,389,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,545,891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                48,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,003,878)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (98,996)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (904,882)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (904,882)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.142)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.137)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered November 2 3 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 21

- 00329

- CR

EARNEST DEWAYNE CLAYTON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Court at Law No. 1 Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR17

- 2027

O RDER

We REINSTATE this appeal. We abat ed for the trial court to make fi ndings

of fact and conclusions of law . The supplemental clerk ’ s record contain ing those

findings and c o nclusions was filed on November 19, 2021.

While the appeal was abate d, the State filed a motion to exten d time to file

its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State ’s brief due by December

31, 2021.

/ s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


SECOND AMENDMENT


TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of September 2, 2008 and amended as of January 25, 2011, (the “Employment Agreement”), by and between AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) and William G. LaPerch (the “Employee”) is effective as of November 30, 2011 (this “Second Amendment”).







WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee are parties to the Employment Agreement, whose term is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2012 (the “Term”); and







WHEREAS, the parties wish to extend the Term of the Employment Agreement to December 31, 2013;







NOW THEREFORE, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:







1.           Section 1(b) of the Employment Agreement shall read as follows:







(b) The term (the “Term”) of the Employee’s employment hereunder will commence on the Effective Date and, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 6 hereof, will terminate at the end of the day on December 31, 2013.  The Term shall be automatically extended unless sooner terminated as provided herein, for successive additional one-year periods, unless at least 120 days prior to the end of Term, the Company or the Employee has notified the other that the Term will not be extended.







2.           All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in force and effect.











  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first set forth above.









	 	ABOVENET, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Robert Sokota	 
	 	 	
Name: Robert Sokota

	 
	 	 	Title: SVP and General Counsel	 
	 	 	 	 












	 	
EMPLOYEE

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	/s/ William G. LaPerch	 
	 	 William G. LaPerch
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 835 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 835

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 
   governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 
                   whether a child has special needs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2015

  Ms. Heitkamp (for herself and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 
   governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 
                   whether a child has special needs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Adoption Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNIZING INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF 
              DETERMINING UNDER THE ADOPTION CREDIT WHETHER A CHILD HAS 
              SPECIAL NEEDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 23(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining child with special needs) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or Indian tribal 
        government'' after the words ``a State''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``or Indian tribal 
        government'' after the words ``such State''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Health Fitness Corporation (the“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon August 14, 2007 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Gregg O. Lehman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                      /s/ Gregg O. Lehman
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Niteroi DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-51512

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 30, 2008.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western *662District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Adam Cardenas, Jr., for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Niteroi Davis presents arguments that are foreclosed by *United States v. Daugherty,*264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), and *United States v. Rawls,*85 F.3d 240, 242-44 (5th Cir.1996), which rejected Commerce Clause challenges to the felon-in-possession-of-a-fírearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). *See United States v. Guidry,*406 F.3d 314, 318-19 (5th Cir. 2005). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.02




STRAIGHT PATH COMMUNICATIONS INC.




Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of


the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)




In connection with the Annual Report of Straight Path Communications Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for fiscal 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Rand, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: October 29, 2013





/s/ Jonathan RandJonathan RandChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Straight Path Communications Inc. and will be retained by Straight Path Communications Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, petitioner, v. Daniel RODRIGUEZ.

No. 09-1434.

Oct. 4, 2010.

Case below, 367 Fed.Appx. 25.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
----

**Exhibit      32 **

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                                                    |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                at the dates and for the periods                indicated. |

|                                                                                 |   |   |                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                 |   |   |                                                                  |
| /s/                ROBERT A. WHITMAN                                                 |   |   | /s/                STEPHEN D. YOUNG                                   |
| Robert                A. WhitmanPresident                and Chief Executive Officer |   |   | Stephen                D. YoungChief                Financial Officer |
| Date:                July 12, 2007                                                   |   |   | Date:                July 12, 2007                                    |
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AND RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: August 8, 2008
    /s/ Edward K. ChristianEdward K. ChristianChief Executive OfficerDated: August 8, 2008
    /s/ Samuel D. BushSamuel D. BushChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7010

WILBER LEE BARKER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE DEEDS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1488-AM) Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 10, 1998 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilber Lee Barker, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Barker v. Deeds , No. CA-96-1488-AM (E.D. Va.June 9, 1998). In addition, issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be reviewed. See Satterfield v. Zahradnick , 572 F.2d 443, 446 (4th Cir. 1978). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED