alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARROW INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MAY 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,282
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                       910
<INVENTORY>                                     75,879
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,781
<PP&E>                                         200,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 363,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,073
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,661
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   363,762
<SALES>                                        218,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               218,224
<CGS>                                          102,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,985
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,835
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,835
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29


</TABLE>
#### SMITH, KLINE & FRENCH LABORATORIES v. ERIC HILL CO., Inc., et al.

No. 27367.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

Feb. 20, 1961.

F. O. Richey, H. F. Schneider, Cleveland, Ohio, George J. Harding, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Ray. T. Miller, Jos. M. Murphy, Miller & Hornbeck, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

*291FREED, District Judge.

Defendants in their motion misconceive the gravamen of the plaintiff’s complaint. It is alleged that plaintiff has created a demand, on behalf of the buying public, for its products because of their distinctiveness; that defendants have manufactured identical pills; that defendant 'had knowledge of an established market for plaintiff’s distinctive pill; that defendant intended that the public be deceived and plaintiff injured thereby; and that such deception or “palming off” has occurred. These allegations are sufficient to state a cause of action within the purview of Rule 8, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

The objection of defendant that certain of these averments are conclusory is not sound. There are no prohibitions in the rules against pleading conclusions.

Motion to dismiss will be overruled.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                 Citizens Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


                  In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on  Form  10-Q  of
Citizens  Financial  Corporation (the "Company")  for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2003,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof  (the "Report")  I, Darrell  R. Wells,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the
Company,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as  adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly  presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             By:       /s/ Darrell R. Wells
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Darrell R. Wells
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 12, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT'S
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ITS THIRD QUARTER OF
              FISCAL YEAR 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
              ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
              STATEMENTS
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-30-1995
<CASH>                                          83,642
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,488
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,329
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               200,736
<PP&E>                                          18,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,086
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           140
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,308
<SALES>                                        211,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               364,392
<CGS>                                          150,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  364,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (7,630)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,292
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
{00040356.DOC;2}**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2013-A (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee. Date:  March 23, 2015   /s/ Brian T. Stevens   Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller                             (senior officer of Servicer in charge of servicing function)
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 21 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY 

4 TO COMMEMORATE THE 150TH ANNIVERSARY 

5 OF THE RATIFICATION OF THE 13TH AMEND6 MENT. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

8 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on Decem9 ber 8, 2015, for a ceremony to commemorate the 150th 

10 Anniversary of the ratification of the 13th Amendment to 

11 the Constitution of the United States, which abolished 

12 slavery in the United States. 

13 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

14 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 
2 

†SCON 21 ES 

1 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may 

2 be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the Senate October 8, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 21 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the 

tion of the 13th Amendment. memorate the 150th Anniversary of the ratificaCapitol Visitor Center for a ceremony to com-
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6386

JOSE GUTIERREZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAN L. DOVE, Warden, Federal Correctional

Institution Edgefield,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-01-2622-3-22)

Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 26, 2002

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Gutierrez, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Gutierrez appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Gutierrez v. Dove, No. CA-01-2622-3-22 (D.S.C. filed Feb.

15, 2002 & entered Feb. 19, 2002). Gutierrez’s motion for a

certificate of appealability is denied as unnecessary. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Nassib G. Chamoun, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aspect Medical Systems, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated: November 9, 2006              /s/ Nassib G. Chamoun   Nassib G. Chamoun   *Chief Executive Officer*
EXHIBIT 35.1 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

Re:  Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, in its capacity as Servicer (the "Servicer") under the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2009, among Daimler Trust, as Titling Trust, Daimler Title Co., as Collateral Agent, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Lender and as Servicer (the "Servicing Agreement"), and under the 2013-A Servicing Supplement, dated as of April 1, 2013, among the same parties (the "Servicing Supplement") for the period from April 24, 2013, to December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period") 

I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: 

(a) 

A review of the Servicer's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement and the Servicing Supplement has been made under my supervision. 

(b) 

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement and the Servicing Supplement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

Dated:  March 18, 2014 

  /s/ Brian T. Stevens 

Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller
**
**Exhibit 31.4**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14 and 15d-14**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, William Duke, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pulmatrix, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Date: July 24, 2019 

 

/s/ William Duke, Jr.
William Duke, Jr.Chief Financial Officer**
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Rex T.Clevenger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)        The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:August 13, 2008

 
| /s/  Rex T. Clevenger                                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|      Rex  T. Clevenger             |   |
|      Executive  Vice President and |   |
|      Chief  Financial Officer      |   |

 

----
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  I, Brian Baker, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
    Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
    report on Form 10-K of the J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities
    Trust 2013-LC11 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
    of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
    to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
    and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
    this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
    instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
    this report on Form 10-K.

  In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
  provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

  Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as
  Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells
  Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator,
  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance
  LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank,
  National Association, as Primary Servicer for the Legacy Place Mortgage Loan,
  LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer for the Legacy Place Mortgage Loan,
  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and Certificate
  Administrator for the Legacy Place Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National
  Association, as Custodian for the Legacy Place Mortgage Loan, and Pentalpha
  Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor for the Legacy Place Mortgage Loan


    Dated:   March 28, 2014


    /s/ Brian Baker
    Signature

    President and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### Leclancha Battery Co. *v.*Western Electric Co.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

August 25, 1884.)

Trade-Mark—Validity oe Mark ,n Doubt—Preliminary Injunction.

Wliere it is very doubtful whether the name claimed as a trade-mark does not describe the articles themsel ces, and the kind of them, and indicate that they are made according to the patent known by the name claimed, rather than that the patentee made them, a preliminary injunction should not be granted.

In Equity.

*Edward N. Dickerson, Jr.,*for orator.

*George P. Barton,*for defendant.

Wheeler, J.

The orator seeks, by motion for a preliminary injunction, to have the defendant restrained from using the words, “Pile Leclancha” and “Disque,” and the orator’s style of label, upon batteries of the defendant’s manufacture, Leclancha was a patentee of an electric battery. One form of his batteries was known as the “disque.” The word “pile” has been used to signify a battery. The prominent feature of the label is a cut of medals awarded to Leclancha’s batteries. The question, of course, is whether these words and this label improperly indicate that the batteries come from the orator, or are merely descriptive of their style and qualities. The patented batteries, of course, would become known to some extent as Leclancha batteries, and the word “disque” would naturally follow that form. These words would become apt to describe the batteries and that kind of them, and would indicate that they were made according to the patent, rather than that the patentee, or the orator bearing his name, made them. *Singer Manuf’g Co.*v. *Stanage,*6 Fed. Rep. 279: *Burton*v. *Stratton,*12 Fed. Rep. 696; *Hostetter*v. *Fries,*17 Fed. Rep. 620; *Wilcox & Gibbs S. M. Co.*v. *The Gibbens Frame,*Id. 623. As the medals were awarded to the patented batteries, the representation of them upon the labels would lie indicative of the reputation of these batteries rather than of their origin. Under these circumstances and authorities, the question whether these things all together amount to *539an unlawful representation of the source of the batteries is so doubtful that the granting of a preliminary injunction does not appear to be warranted.

Motion denied.