alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 11 

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving 

the Human Rights Amendment Act of 2014. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2015 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself and Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council 

in approving the Human Rights Amendment Act of 2014. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress disapproves of the action of the District 

4 of Columbia Council described as follows: The Human 

5 Rights Amendment Act of 2014 (D.C. Act 20–605), 

6 signed by the Mayor of the District of Columbia on Janu7 ary 25, 2015, and transmitted to Congress pursuant to 

8 section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule 

9 Act on March 6, 2015. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form
10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1998. And is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          38,783
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  824,202<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     79,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,405,746
<PP&E>                                       2,521,698
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,132,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,108,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,969,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<COMMON>                                    21,779,122
<OTHER-SE>                                   (430,715)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,108,329
<SALES>                                         26,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,952
<CGS>                                          155,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,078
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               527,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (649,961)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (649,961)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (649,961)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Note receivable for preferred stock of $279,476 and deferred compensation of
$151,239 are shown as contra-equity accounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kronos Incorporated (the
Company) for the period ended January 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Mark S.
Ain, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul A. Lacy, Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: February 17, 2004 | /s/ Mark S. Ain                            
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|                        | Mark S. Ain
        Chief Executive Officer
|                       



|Date: February 17, 2004 | /s/ Paul A. Lacy                                                                 
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Paul A. Lacy
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kronos Incorporated and will be
retained by Kronos Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andshareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loanoutsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and forthe year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii),1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii)and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicingactivities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Companyperformed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activitiesperformed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors thatmay have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affectedthe balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basisfor our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which theCompany served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F:214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                          |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |

|                                               |   |   |                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                               |   |   |                                              |
|        /s/ Robert A. Whitman                  |   |   |        /s/ Stephen D. Young                  |
| Robert      A. WhitmanChief      Executive Officer |   |   | Stephen      D. YoungChief      Financial Officer |
| Date:      April 10, 2008                          |   |   | Date:      April 10, 2008                         |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ted Lee WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-20713

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 14, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

William Barton Portis, Jr., Portis & Sheena, Houston, TX, for Defendanb-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ted Wright appeals his conviction of unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He argues that the government breached an agreement not to prosecute him in exchange for information he provided in a debriefing. Wright has not shown that the district court clearly erred in finding there was no nonprosecution agreement and in denying his motion. Wright presented no evidence that he and the government entered into a nonprosecution agreement or that the government issued a formal grant of immunity from prosecution. Wright’s argument is based solely on his subjective interpretation of the agents’ statements 'during his debriefing. *See United States v. Conaway,*11 F.3d 40, 42 (5th Cir.1993); *see also United States v. Weiss,*599 F.2d 730, 735-36 (5th Cir.1979).

Wright contends that the government’s decision to prosecute him and not his business partner, Evan Lowenstein, constitutes selective prosecution. Wright has presented no evidence to rebut the presumption of regularity supporting the government’s decision to prosecute him under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Wright has not shown that Lowenstein was a similarly situated person of a different race who could have been prosecuted but was not. *See United States v. Arm*
      *737
      *strong,*517 U.S. 456, 465-66, 116 S.Ct. 1480, 134 L.Ed.2d 687 (1996); *United States v. Webster,*162 F.3d 308, 333-34 (5th Cir.1998). Wright also does not assert that he was prosecuted based on his race or religion or to prevent his exercise of a particular constitutional right. *See Armstrong,*517 U.S. at 465-66, 116 S.Ct. 1480; *Webster,*162 F.3d at 333-34.

The government presented evidence showing that the reason it did not prosecute Lowenstein under §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) is that Lowenstein’s conviction had been set aside and because the firearms were found in a locked safe in Lowenstein’s garage to which he could not provide a key or a combination. Therefore, Wright has not shown discriminatory effect and discriminatory intent to establish that he was selectively prosecuted. *See Armstrong,*517 U.S. at 465-66, 116 S.Ct. 1480; *Webster,*162 F.3d at 333-34.

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 43 

Supporting the bid of Los Angeles, California, to bring the 2024 Summer 

Olympic Games back to the United States and pledging the cooperation 

of Congress with respect to that bid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11, 2016 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. ISAKSON, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BENNET, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. NELSON, Mr. GARDNER, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the bid of Los Angeles, California, to bring the 

2024 Summer Olympic Games back to the United States 

and pledging the cooperation of Congress with respect 

to that bid. 

Whereas the International Olympic Committee will meet on 

September 13, 2017, in Lima, Peru, to consider a site for 

the Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games (in this preamble referred to as the ‘‘Games’’) in 2024; 

Whereas the United States Olympic Committee has selected 

Los Angeles, California, as the candidate of the United 

States for the 2024 Games; 

Whereas the Games further the cause of world peace and understanding; 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 43 IS 

Whereas the country that hosts the Games performs an act 

of international goodwill; 

Whereas the Games have not been held in the United States 

since 1996; 

Whereas many of the world-class venues to be used in Los 

Angeles’ 2024 plan for the Games are already built or 

are planned as permanent facilities; and 

Whereas Los Angeles is positioned to deliver an innovative, 

fiscally responsible, and sustainable Games: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) advises the International Olympic Com4 mittee that the United States would welcome the 

5 holding of the 2024 Summer Olympic and 

6 Paralympic Games in Los Angeles, California, the 

7 site designated by the United States Olympic Com8 mittee; 

9 (2) expresses the sincere hope that the United 

10 States will be selected as the site for the 2024 Sum11 mer Olympic and Paralympic Games and pledges co12 operation and support toward the successful fulfill13 ment of those Games in the highest sense of the 

14 Olympic tradition; and 

15 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

16 the Senate transmit an enrolled copy of this resoluVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:13 Jul 11, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SC43.IS SC43

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SCON 43 IS 

1 tion to the United States Olympic Committee and to 

2 the International Olympic Committee. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit (10)(l)
 Amendment
 Deferred SalarySavings Plan
(Amended and Restated as of December 1, 2007)
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Now Therefore,
 Separation from
Service
    
    Means the Employee retires or otherwise has a separation from service
from the company as defined under Code Section 409A and any applicable
regulations. The Plan Administrator will determine, consistent with
the requirements of Code Section 409A and any applicable regulations,
to what extent a person on a leave of absence, including on paid sick
leave pursuant to Company policy, has incurred a Separation from
Service. Notwithstanding the above, a Separation from Service will
occur consistent with the requirement of Code Section 409A when it is
reasonably anticipated that the future level of bona fide services
provided by the Employee (whether as an employee or as an independent
contractor) will be no more than 45% of the average level of bona fide
services performed by the Employee (whether as an employee or as an
independent contractor) over the immediately preceding 36 month period
(or the full period of services, if less than 36 months).
 1




---



##### 



Signed this 21 day of December, 2008.CMS Energy Corporation:/s/ John M. Butler

John M. ButlerSenior Vice President  Human Resources and Administrative ServicesAttest:/s/ Catherine M. Reynolds

Catherine M. ReynoldsVice President and Secretary
 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ARROW INTERNATIONAL, INC. 3RD QTR 10Q 96
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,428
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                       690
<INVENTORY>                                     41,235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,363
<PP&E>                                         154,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 293,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,726
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,499
<OTHER-SE>                                     167,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   293,823
<SALES>                                        170,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,838
<CGS>                                           80,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   907
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,363
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,564
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,799
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,799
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
UNAUDITED INTERIM STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         442,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                       953
<INVENTORY>                                  1,583,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,198,760
<PP&E>                                         421,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                 269,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,387,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,337,040
<BONDS>                                        611,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          957,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,413
<OTHER-SE>                                   (574,547)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,387,436
<SALES>                                        330,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               893,021
<CGS>                                          301,062
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  659,822
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,014,988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,308
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (658,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (658,612)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (658,612)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.020)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.020)
        

</TABLE>
(logo)**Prudential**

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

 

RE:         **WFRBS 2013-C14**

Period: **January 1, 2018 to December 31,2018(the "Reporting Period")**

 

 

**Annual ComplianceStatement**

 

I, Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity asPresident and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the"Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role asSub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement")dated as of June 1, 2013, pertaining to the above-referenced certificates,that:

 

       (i)           areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement  during theperiod noted above, and  of the performance of the Company under theAgreement during the  relevant  period  has been made under mysupervision, and

 

     (ii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

   (iii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled itsobligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

    (iv)           theCompany has maintained an effective internal control system over the servicingof mortgage loans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

     (v)           theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

Effectiveas of February 22, 2019

 

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.