alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Entertainment Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated January14, 2011






/s/ Richard KozubackRichard KozbuackPresident & Chief Executive Officer/s/ Charles B. MathewsCharles B. MathewsVice President & Chief Financial Officer
Order entered July 1 4 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00531
- CV JUAN CARLOS FLORES, Appellant

V. CHASCO, INC. A/K/A C HASCO INTERIORS, INC ., ET AL., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 09
- 14912
- H



### O RDER
T he reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated June 3, 2014, we notified the official court reporter for the 160th Judicial District Court that the reporter’s record was

o verdue. We directed the court reporter to file the record within thirty days. To date, we have not received any response. Accordingly, we ORDER court reporter Sharron Rankin to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the reporte r’s record; (2) written verification that no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has not requested or made payment arrangements for the record. We notify appellant that if we receive verification it has not requested, paid f

or, or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, we willorder the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c)

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5                     
<MULTIPLIER>                    1              
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. Dollars              
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998              
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998   
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998   
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                     0             
<SECURITIES>                               0  
<RECEIVABLES>                      8,294,814  
<ALLOWANCES>                         552,000           
<INVENTORY>                          644,479  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   8,713,235  
<PP&E>                             4,666,337  
<DEPRECIATION>                     1,395,448  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    25,879,127  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             14,699,859  
<BONDS>                            8,332,639  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0  
<PREFERRED>                                0  
<COMMON>                             118,844  
<OTHER-SE>                        10,255,143 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      25,879,127  
<SALES>                            5,695,389  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  24,820,587 
<CGS>                              4,404,261  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     24,298,369  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   612,267  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       14,658  
<INCOME-TAX>                              29  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   14,619  
<DISCONTINUED>                    (3,584,865)  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0            
<CHANGES>                                  0  
<NET-INCOME>                      (3,570,246)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            .00 
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.30)  
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1


                     Independent Accountants' Review Report


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
DataTRAK International, Inc.


We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
DataTRAK International (formerly Collaborative Clinical Research, Inc.), Inc.
and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of June 30, 1999, and the related condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 1998 and 1999 and the condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 1998 and 1999. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical review
procedures to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an
audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which
will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of DataTRAK International, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, not
presented herein, and in our report dated February 5, 1999, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion,
the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


                                                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
July 20, 1999
Exhibit 32.2


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of Zunicom, Inc. and Subsidiary (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),I, John C. Rudy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350, as
enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;
                      and

                 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                      in all material respects, the financial condition and
                      results of operations of the Company,


/s/ John C. Rudy
----------------------
John C. Rudy
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer

November 13, 2008



























                                Exhibit 32.2 - 1
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 768 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 768

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide Medicare 
 beneficiary access to eye tracking accessories for speech generating 
  devices and to remove the rental cap for durable medical equipment 
 under the Medicare Program with respect to speech generating devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 18, 2015

  Mr. Vitter (for himself, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. King, Mr. Grassley, Mr. 
 Kirk, Ms. Collins, and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide Medicare 
 beneficiary access to eye tracking accessories for speech generating 
  devices and to remove the rental cap for durable medical equipment 
 under the Medicare Program with respect to speech generating devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Steve Gleason Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDING MEDICARE BENEFICIARY ACCESS TO EYE TRACKING 
              ACCESSORIES FOR SPEECH GENERATING DEVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(n) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended by inserting ``and eye tracking and gaze 
interaction accessories for speech generating devices furnished to 
individuals with a demonstrated medical need for such accessories'' 
after ``appropriate organizations)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to devices furnished on or after January 1, 2016.

SEC. 3. REMOVING THE RENTAL CAP FOR DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT UNDER 
              MEDICARE WITH RESPECT TO SPEECH GENERATING DEVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1834(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (iii), by adding ``or'' at the end; and
            (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following new 
        clause:
                            ``(iv) which serves as a speech generating 
                        device or which is an accessory that is needed 
                        for the individual to effectively utilize such 
                        a device,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to devices furnished on or after July 1, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 1 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax is not in the economic 

interest of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2015 

Mr. VITTER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax is not 

in the economic interest of the United States. 

Whereas a carbon tax is regressive in nature and would unfairly burden those vulnerable individuals and families in 

the United States that are already struggling with increasing electricity rates and a slow economic recovery; 

Whereas a carbon tax would increase the cost of every good 

manufactured in the United States; 

Whereas a carbon tax would harm the entire United States 

manufacturing sector; 

Whereas European nations that have adopted carbon policies 

and regulatory regimes have forced energy poverty on 

their citizens and undermined their economies; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 1 IS 

Whereas the increase in production of domestic fossil energy 

resources on private and State-owned land has created 

significant job growth and private capital investment; and 

Whereas affordable and reliable energy sources are critical to 

maintaining the United States global competitiveness: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that a carbon 

3 tax would be detrimental to families and businesses in the 

4 United States, and is not in the interest of the United 

5 States. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### JAMES JULIAN, INC. v. CENTRAL DELAWARE COUNTY AUTHORITY v. RIDPATH AND POTTER COMPANY, INC. and Standard Accident Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 31133.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 10, 1962.

John B. Brumbelow, Blank, Rudenko, Klaus & Rome, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

W. Charles Hogg, Jr., Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., for Central Delaware County Authority.

Samuel H. High, Jr., High, Swartz, Roberts & Seidel, Norristown, Pa., for Ridpath, and Potter Company, Inc. and Standard Accident Insurance Company.

GRIM, Senior Judge.

This is an action by a construction contractor for damages it claims to have sustained in building a sewer for defendant under a contract awarded to plaintiff under competitive bidding. Plaintiff claims to have suffered damages on the ground that defendant misrepresented the condition of the subsurface where the work was to be done and that hence plaintiff’s actual costs for doing the work were much higher than defendant led it to believe. Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

The contract is a thorough one, carefully drawn to accomplish certain ends, *305one of them being to prevent the contractor from collecting more than the amount of its bid, which is the price of the work called for by the contract. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is based largely upon the contention that the contract provisions in reference to plaintiff’s duty to examine carefully the subsurface condition and not to rely upon defendant’s statements relative thereto cover the facts of this case so completely that plaintiff simply cannot recover.

A motion to dismiss, of course, will not be granted in a case where there is a genuine issue as to any material fact. The present case turns on defendant’s representations as to the subsurface conditions where the sewer extension was to be built and in reliance on which plaintiff’s bid was made. As to this, plaintiff’s complaint says: “Said representations were false and untrue, as defendant knew or should have known.” This averment suggests the existence of fraud, actual or constructive, on the part of the defendant in inducing plaintiff to enter into the contract at the price stated in it. If this be so, the contract may be vitiated by the actual or constructive fraud (See Pennsylvania Turnpike Com. v. Smith, 350 Pa. 355, 39 A.2d 139 (1944)), and despite the protective provisions in the contract defendant should be given an opportunity to present what evidence it may have on this issue, which is largely one of fact. In view of this, defendant’s motion to dismiss must be denied.

This memorandum is not to be construed as defining actual or constructive fraud or as limiting the issues in this case. All such matters are left open for later determination in the case.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended February 29, 2004 of Arrow International, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frederick J. Hirt, the Vice
President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, to my knowledge and based upon a review of the
Report, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and periods presented as required by
          such Report.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, my own due diligence and representations
made by certain other members of the Company's senior management.



                    /s/ Frederick J. Hirt
                    --------------------------------------------------------
                    Frederick J. Hirt
                    Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance
                    (Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)

                    April 14, 2004



                                      (40)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

HOWARD O. TRERICE

, an individual,

Appellant,

v.

HEATH M. TRERICE

, individually and in his derivative capacity, on

behalf of MILJOCO CORPORATION

, a Florida Corporation,

Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2

[ October 11, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Michael L. Gates , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 16

- 7823

(12)

Vijay G. Brijbasi of Dickinso n Wright PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for

appellant.

John A. Tuc ker and Andrew E. Underkofler of Foley & Lardner LLP,

Jacksonville, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, M AY and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff 

MERILLAT INDUSTRIES, INC./MASCO CORPORATION 

AND 

MICHIGAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2369-95-4 PER CURIAM 

 MARCH 19, 1996 

MARY LEE PRESGRAVES 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' 

COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Thomas G. Bell, Jr.; Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & 

Moses, on brief), for appellants. 

 (George Warren Shanks, on brief), for appellee. 

 Merillat Industries, Inc. and its insurer contend that the 

Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that Mary Lee 

Presgraves' bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome qualifies as a 

compensable occupational disease within the meaning of "disease" 

under the Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act"). 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 

 This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in 

Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ 

(1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from 

cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or 

however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under 

the present provisions of the Act"). 

 Accordingly, we reverse the commission's decision. 

 Reversed.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her
capacity as an officer of e.Digital Corporation (the "Company"), that, to his or
her knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:
August 4, 2010





/s/ ROBERT PUTNAMRobert
      Putnam,Interim
      Chief Accounting Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





Date:
August 4, 2010





/s/ ALFRED H. FALKAlfred
      H. Falk,President
      and CEO,(Principal
      Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 168 (Thursday, August 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18467]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-2318-000]


Cuyama Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Cuyama Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 14, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f7b1b2a5b4b8999b9e9992a4828787988583b791928594d9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="470102150408292b2e292214323737283533072122352469202831">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 25, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-18467 Filed 8-30-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>