alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-643

In Re: CHARLIE M. TAYLOR,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-95-706-5-F)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 31, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlie M. Taylor, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charlie Taylor brought this mandamus petition seeking an order

directing the district court to render a decision on his motion for

relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). Because we find that the

delay to date has not been excessive, we deny mandamus relief. The

denial is without prejudice to Taylor's right to file a new petition if the district court does not take expedient action. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not significantly aid in the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Unemployment rates of veterans who served since September 2001 
and nonveterans, selected age groups, 2008  


	                      Percent	

Age		Veterans who served 	Nonveterans
		since Sept. 2001

Total			7.3		    5.6
18 - 24		       14.1	           11.6
25 - 34			7.3	            5.8
35 - 44			4.9	            4.6
45 - 54			3.3	            4.1
55 - 64			3.3	            3.7
Median usual weekly earnings of female full-time wage 
and salary workers by occupation, 2007 annual averages


Occupation					  Weekly earnings	

Service							$406	
Production, transportation, and material moving		 437
Natural resources, construction, and maintenance	 539
Sales and office					 550
Professional and related				 835
Management, business, and financial operations		 908
BLS WORKING PAPERS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of Labor Statistics

 

OFFICE OF RESEARCH

METHODS AND STANDARDS

The Minimum Wage and the Job Package

J. Wilson Mixon, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Working Paper 32

January 1975

 

These papers are circulated for the information of members of the staff of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and other

professionals interested in the work of the Bureau. They have not been cleared for publication and should not be quoted

without permission of the authors. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the policies of the Bureau

of Labor Statistics or the views of other BLS sfaff members.
#### Harry H. HOSACK, Claimant-Appellee, v. Gordon H. MANSFIELD, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 2007-7023.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 10, 2007.

Before RADER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

The Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves without opposition to vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and remand this appeal.

Harry H. Hosack appealed to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims from a July 15, 2004 decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals that, inter alia, determined Hosack had received adequate notification of the evidence or information necessary to substantiate his claim as required by 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) through receipt of various pre and post-decisional communications.

Having determined that the Board’s reliance on post-decisional communications was improper under *Mayfield v. Nicholson,*444 F.3d 1328 (Fed.Cir.2006) and noting that it was uncertain whether the Board would have concluded that pre-decisional communications alone would have satisfied the Secretary’s section 5103(a) notice requirements, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims held that it was not in a position to determine whether the notice error was prejudicial. The court vacated and remanded for the Board to decide the issue in the first instance. The Secretary appealed, seeking review by this court.

On October 4, 2007, the court issued its decision in *Mlechick v. Mansfield,*503 F.3d 1340 (Fed.Cir.2007). *Mlechick*held that the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims cannot refuse to consider the rule of prejudicial error if the Board relied on both pre and post-decisional communications. *Id.*at 1345-46. Rather, in cases such as this, where the Secretary has attempted to show the notice error was nonprejudicial, the court should review the pre-decisional communications “to determine if any differences between the notice given and the notice required by [section 5103(a) ] ‘affected the fundamental fairness of the adjudication’ being mindful that the burden is on [the Secretary] to make such a showing.” *Id.*(citation omitted).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Acting Secretary’s motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

(3) The revised official caption is reflected above.
**Exhibit 10.25**

**EXECUTION COPY**

JOINDERAGREEMENT 

JOINDER AGREEMENT dated as of February 27, 2019, by MUFG Union Bank, N.A. (the “AssumingLender”), in favor of Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), and SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent under the Credit Agreement referred to below (in such capacity, together with its successorsin such capacity, the “Administrative Agent”). 

The Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party theretoand the Administrative Agent are parties to a Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2013 (as amended by the First Omnibus Amendment to Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement and Guarantee and SecurityAgreement, dated as of October 3, 2014, the Second Amendment to Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2015, the Third Amendment to Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2016,the Fourth Amendment to Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2018, the Fifth Amendment to Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2018, and as further amended, supplemented,amended and restated, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”). 

Pursuant to Section 2.08(e) of the Credit Agreement, the Assuming Lender hereby agrees to (and doeshereby) become a “Lender” under and for all purposes of the Credit Agreement with a Dollar Commitment equal to $100,000,000. Without limiting the foregoing, the Assuming Lender hereby agrees to be bound by and comply with all of the termsand provisions of the Credit Agreement applicable to it as a “Lender” thereunder. 

Sections 9.06, 9.09 and 9.10of the Credit Agreement apply to this Joinder Agreement *mutatis mutandis*. 

*[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]*

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Assuming Lender has caused this Joinder Agreement tobe duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written. 

 

MUFG UNION BANK, N.A., 

as Assuming Lender

By:
 
/s/ Jeanne Horn

Name: Jeanne Horn

Title:   Managing Director

 

 
*Signature Page to MUFGJoinder Agreement (BDC)*

Accepted and agreed:

GOLDMAN SACHS BDC, INC.,

as Borrower

By:
 
/s/ Jonathan Lamm

Name: Jonathan Lamm

Title:   Authorized Signatory

 

 
*Signature Page to MUFGJoinder Agreement (BDC)*

SUNTRUST BANK,

as Administrative Agent and Issuing Bank

By:
 
/s/ Doug Kennedy

Name: Doug Kennedy

Title:   Director

 

 
*Signature Page to MUFGJoinder Agreement (BDC)*
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


and Chief
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350








In connection with the Annual Report of
Dialysis Corporation of America (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date therein specified (the “Report”), the undersigned, Stephen W. Everett,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Andrew Jeanneret, Vice
President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of our
knowledge:





(1)         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods covered by the Report.





/s/
      Stephen W. EverettSTEPHEN
      W. EVERETT, President and ChiefExecutive
      Officer/s/
      ANDREW JEANNERETANDREW
      JEANNERET, Vice President, Finance andChief
      Financial Officer





Dated:
March 13, 2009





It is not intended that this
certification be deemed to be filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section; and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 505 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the Health Coverage 

Tax Credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the Health Coverage Tax Credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HEALTH COVERAGE TAX CRED4 IT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

6 35(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘January 1, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 

8 2020’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 505 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to coverage months beginning after 

3 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

In the Interest of A.R.O., a Child,

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00025-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2016DCM2321)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter’s second request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until April 1, 2018. NO FURTHER REQUESTS 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Muriel Montrose, Court Reporter, for El Paso County, Texas

Prepare, the Reporter’s Record for the above styled and numbered cause, and forward the same to 

this Court on or before April 1, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8

th day of March, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit (23)(b)

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos.333-32229, 333-58686 and No. 333-76347), S-3 (Nos.
333-51932, 333-52560, 333-27849, 333-37241, 333-74958, 333-45556) and S-4 (No.
33-60007) of CMS Energy Corporation of our report dated February 18, 2004
relating to the financial statements of Midland Cogeneration Venture L.P. which
appears in the CMS Energy Corporation Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 2003.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Detroit, Michigan
July 20, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         727,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  823,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    953,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,765,000
<PP&E>                                       1,092,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,870,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,234,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,000
<COMMON>                                     6,062,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,870,000
<SALES>                                      4,982,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,136,000
<CGS>                                        2,939,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,939,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,299,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             171,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,892,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,892,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,892,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 7, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130443 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ARNETTA GRABLE, Pers Robert P. Young, Jr. onal Representative Stephen J. Markman, of the Estate of LAMAR GRABLE, Deceased, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130443 

 COA: 256215 
 Wayne CC: 99-906156-NO

EUGENE BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0531 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 7, 2006 

Clerk
Nicor
        Gas
        Company
 Form
        10-K
 Exhibit
        23.01
 
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
        333-65486 on Form S-3 of our report, dated February 23, 2007, relating to
        the
        financial statements and financial statement schedule of Northern Illinois
        Gas
        Company (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
        paragraph related to changes, in 2006, in method of accounting for defined
        benefit pension and other postretirement plans, and method of accounting
        for
        share based payments as discussed in Note 2 and a change, in 2005, in the
        method
        of accounting for conditional asset retirement obligations as discussed in
        Note
        3), and management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over
        financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northern
        Illinois Gas Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
 /s/ ** DELOITTE
        & TOUCHE LLP
 
 Chicago,
        Illinois
 February
        23, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RIVERWOOD HOLDING INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          15,009
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  155,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,394
<INVENTORY>                                    167,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               355,438
<PP&E>                                       1,380,462
<DEPRECIATION>                                 516,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,302,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          266,049
<BONDS>                                      1,684,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                     243,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,302,475
<SALES>                                        574,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               574,751
<CGS>                                          443,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  443,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (1,093)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              92,505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (24,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,437
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (24,818)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (24,818)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Gary Steven Garrett v Darita Camille Washington Docket No. 323705 LC No. 14-005222-NI M ichael J. Talbot, C.J. Presiding Judge All Court of Appeals

Judges The Court orders that a special panel shall not be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(1) to resolve a conflict between this case and 

### Cynth ia Adam v Susan Letrice Bell, _ Mich App _ (Doc ket No. 319778 , issued August 11, 2015).

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

## MAR 1· 4

· 2016 Date
EXHIBIT 11.0
   Three Months Ended June 30,
    
    
    Six Months Ended June 30,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008Net earnings, basic and diluted
    
    $
    356,451
    
    
    $
    362,700
    
    
    $
    1,359,639
    
    
    $
    687,412Weighted average common shares
outstanding, basic
    
    
    9,722,328
    
    
    
    9,863,977
    
    
    
    9,695,135
    
    
    
    9,953,124Common share equivalents relating to:Stock options
    
    
    79,498
    
    
    
    125,645
    
    
    
    47,679
    
    
    
    181,628Warrants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,747
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    6,134Restricted stock
    
    
    336,081
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    328,871
    
    
    
    Weighted average common shares
outstanding
    
    
    10,137,907
    
    
    
    9,992,369
    
    
    
    10,071,685
    
    
    
    10,140,886Net earnings per share:Basic
    
    $
    0.04
    
    
    $
    0.04
    
    
    $
    0.14
    
    
    $
    0.07Diluted
    
    $
    0.04
    
    
    $
    0.04
    
    
    $
    0.13
    
    
    $
    0.07Anti-dilutive stock options,
warrants and restricted stock not
included in the diluted earnings per
share computations
    
    
    1,675,916
    
    
    
    1,553,950
    
    
    
    1,793,016
    
    
    
    1,485,665
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
John A. Manzoni, certify that:

March 9,
2009

|By:    | /s/JOHN A. MANZONI                    |  | 
|------ | ------------------------------------- |  | 
|Name:  | John A. Manzoni                       |  | 
|Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

1

---



CERTIFICATIONS

I,
L. Scott Thomson, certify that:

March 9,
2009

|By:    | /s/L. SCOTT THOMSON                                           |  | 
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Name:  | L. Scott Thomson                                              |  | 
|Title: | Executive Vice-President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer |  | 

2

---



QuickLinks
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL WEYMOUTH,

Appellant,

v.

VERONICA WEYMOUTH n/k/a VERONICA HOTCHKISS,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-0186

[February 29, 2024]

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Frank Ledee, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-

14193 FMCE.

Nancy W. Gregoire Stamper of Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, 

Fort Lauderdale, and Howard S. Friedman of Fischler & Friedman, P.A., 

Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Terrence P. O’Connor of Morgan, Carratt & O’Connor, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Letter from Registrant to Scott J. Freidheim



 EXHIBIT 10.33 
 [SEARS HOLDINGS LETTERHEAD] 
 February 18, 2009 
 Mr. Scott J. Freidheim 
 Dear Scott, 
 The purpose of this letter is to document the value of the cash component of the long-term special incentive award provided in your Sears Holdings employment offer letter dated November 20, 2008 (the “offer
letter”). 
 In accordance with the terms of the offer letter, you are entitled to receive a long-term special incentive award comprised of restricted
stock and cash, if applicable, totaling $3,500,000 gross (subject to satisfaction of the applicable vesting schedule). Under the restricted stock component you are to receive a restricted stock grant equal to the lesser of $3,500,000 or the dollar
value of the product of 50,000 shares times the closing price of SHC stock on the grant date, which was February 2, 2009. The cash component, if any, would equal $3,500,000 less the dollar value of the restricted shares awarded. 
 On February 3rd, a Restricted Stock Award Agreement was issued to you indicating that a total of 50,000 restricted shares of SHC stock were granted on February 2, 2009 at a price of $39.91 per share for a total grant value of $1,995,500. The shares
are scheduled to vest in four (4) equal annual installments beginning with the first anniversary of the grant date. 
 Based on the terms of your offer
letter and the determined grant date value of the restricted stock, the cash component of the long-term special incentive award is $1,504,500 (gross). The cash component is scheduled to vest in four (4) equal annual installments beginning with
the first anniversary of your date of hire which was January 5, 2009. In summary, the cash component is scheduled to vest as follows: 
  

					
	Payment Number	  	Payment Amount (gross)	  	Due Date*
	1	  	$376,125	  	January 5, 2010
	2	  	$376,125	  	January 5, 2011
	3	  	$376,125	  	January 5, 2012
	4	  	$376,125	  	January 5, 2013
	TOTAL	  	$1,504,500	  	 

 *Payments will be made as soon as administratively feasible following the applicable due date. 
 This letter, along with the Restricted Stock Award Agreement issued to you on February 3, 2009, represent a full accounting of the stock and cash components of the
long-term special incentive award provided in your offer letter. 
 Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 
 Sincerely, 
 /s/ Karl J. Koenig 
 Karl J. Koenig