alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet, statements of operations and cash flows and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such form 10Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,681
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  401,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,454
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               410,079
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 410,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,939
<BONDS>                                        200,931
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     204,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   410,079
<SALES>                                         12,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,338
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,069
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,636
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at September 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and the Statement of
Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,469
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,193
<PP&E>                                       1,066,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                 527,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 569,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               37
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     569,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   569,353
<SALES>                                        192,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,198
<CGS>                                          126,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               153,935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (86,859)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (86,859)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (86,859)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (31.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (31.99)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                        
                                  EXHIBIT 11.0
                                        
                           CONTROL DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
                    Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
                  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                            Three Months Ended
                                          March 31,    March 31,
                                            1997         1996
<S>                                    <C>           <C>

Net earnings applicable to                                     
  common shares:                                               
    Net earnings                         $  16,600     $  2,878
                                                               
Primary:                                                       
  Shares for common and common share                           
  equivalent earnings per share (1):                           
    Weighted average number of                                 
      common shares outstanding         13,208,026   13,130,885
    Dilutive effect of outstanding                             
      stock options and warrants           742,124    1,156,463
                                                               
                                        13,950,150   14,287,348
                                                               
Net earnings per common share                                  
  and common share equivalents          $     1.19   $     0.20
                                                               
Fully Diluted:                                                 
  Shares for common and common share                           
  equivalent earnings per share (2):                           
    Weighted average number of                                 
      common shares outstanding         13,208,026   13,130,885
    Dilutive effect of outstanding                             
      stock options and warrants           742,124    1,178,848
                                                               
                                        13,950,150   14,309,733
                                                               
Net earnings per common share                                  
  and common share equivalents          $     1.19   $     0.20

<FN>
(1) Outstanding stock options, warrants, and shares
   issuable  under  employee stock  purchase  plans
   are  converted  to common share  equivalents  by
   the  treasury  stock method  using  the  average
   market  price  of  the Company's  shares  during
   each period.

(2) Outstanding stock options, warrants, and shares
   issuable  under  employee stock  purchase  plans
   are  converted  to common share  equivalents  by
   the  treasury stock method using the greater  of
   the  average  market  price  or  the  period-end
   market  price  of  the Company's  shares  during
   each period.
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DAISYTEK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             725
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,075
<INVENTORY>                                    119,722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               241,044
<PP&E>                                          31,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,038
<BONDS>                                         37,261
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           170
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,591
<SALES>                                        222,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               222,589
<CGS>                                          196,062
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  196,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   525
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,002
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,393
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,393
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No . 1 3

- B G

- 1502
I N RE L ORENZO C. F ITZGERALD , J R ., R ESPONDENT

. A Suspended Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar Registration No. 390603) On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility

(BDN

- 127

- 09) (Submitted October 14, 2014 Decided December 4, 2014)
Before T HOMPSON and B ECKWITH , Associate Judges , and N EBEKER , Senior Judge

.

P ER C URIAM : Having found by clear and convincing evidence that respondent, Lorenzo C. Fitzger a l d, Jr. , violated District of Columbia Rules of
Professional Conduct 1.1 6 ( d ), 8.1 (a), 8.1 ( b ), 8.4 ( c ), and 8.4 (d), the Board on Professional Responsibility (“t he Board”) recommend ed that respondent be suspended for the period of one year, and demonstrate fitness prior to
reinstatement

. The Board found that respondent failed to deliver a client’s file to client’s successor counsel, did not respond to Bar Counsel in a timel y manner, falsely asserted to Bar Counsel that he properly delivered clie nt’s file, and falsely2

asserted to Bar Counsel that he did not receive Bar Counsel’s requests for
information

. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel filed an exception to the Board ’ s

re commendation.

Pursuant to District of Columbia Bar Rule XI, § 9 (h)(2), “ [I] f no exceptions are filed to the Board’s report, the Court will enter an order imposing the discipline recommended by the Board upon the expiration of the time permitted for filing exceptions. ” Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Lorenzo C. Fitzgerald, Jr., be suspended from the District of
Columbia Bar for a period of one year

. 1 For purposes of reinstatement, the period of respondent ’ s suspension shall run from the date on wh ich he file d the affidavit required by District of Columbia Bar Rule XI, § 14 (g). Respondent must demonstrate fitness to practice law prior to reinstatement. We direct respondent ’ s attention to the responsibilities of disbarred attorneys set forth in Di strict of
Columbia Bar Rule XI, §§ 14 and 16.

So ordered.

1 This court suspended respondent from practicing law on March 25, 2014, after responde nt failed to show cause why he should not be suspended pending final action on the Board’s report. In re Lorenzo C. Fitzgerald, Jr. , No. 13

- BG

1502, Order at 1 (D.C. Mar. 25, 2014).
Mutual Termination Agreement with Marathon Petroleum



 Exhibit 10.15 
 MUTUAL TERMINATION AGREEMENT 
 This Mutual Termination Agreement is entered
as of the 28th day of July, 2011, by and among each of Marathon Petroleum Company LP (f/k/a Marathon Petroleum Company LLC), a Delaware limited partnership (“MPC”), and MPC Investment LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and
general partner of MPC (together with MPC, the “Service Provider”), on one hand, and Mascoma Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Client”), on the other hand. 

WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a certain Master Engineering Services Agreement, dated June 17, 2010 (together with all
Project Authorization Form(s) and other exhibits and schedules executed in connection therewith, the “Services Agreement”), pursuant to which Service Provider has provided certain engineering and related services to Client at
Client’s pilot plant at Rome, New York; and 
 WHEREAS, Service Provider ceased performing services under the Services
Agreement on October 31, 2010; and 
 WHEREAS, Client and Service Provider mutually desire to terminate the Services
Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties do hereby agree as follows; 
 1. The
Services Agreement is hereby terminated in its entirety and will be of no further force or effect after the date hereof. Such termination shall not adversely affect any rights or obligations relating to the services provided prior to termination or
any provisions of the Services Agreement which are intended to survive the expiration or termination of the Services Agreement (including, without limitation, all rights and obligations under Section 17 of the General Terms and Conditions
forming a part of the Services Agreement). 
 2. The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that a total amount of $416,504,02 is
owed and payable by Client to Service Provider as full and final compensation for all services rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred under the Services Agreement. Service Provider has agreed to accept in full satisfaction of such amounts owed
and payable $416,504.02 of Subordinated Convertible Notes issued by Client in August, 2011, in substantially the form provided to Service Provider in July, 2011. 
 3. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and when so executed shall constitute one instrument legally binding upon the parties hereto. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Mutual Termination Agreement to be executed by their respective authorized
representatives. 
 [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 







 



 

			
	MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LP
		
	By:	 	MPC Investment LLC, its General Partner
		
	By:	 	/s/ David L. Whikehart
	Name:	 	David L. Whikehart
	Title:	 	Director, Product Supply

 



 

			
	MPC INVESTMENT LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ David L. Whikehart
	Name:	 	David L. Whikehart
	Title:	 	Director, Product Supply

  

			
	MASCOMA CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Alan Belcher
	Name:	 	Alan Belcher
	Title:	 	Senior VP Operations
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-60010 Summary Calendar

__________________
JERRY D. GRAVES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JIMMY PARKER; CHRISTOPHER EPPS; GREGORY BRIGGS; JOHN DOE COLEMAN; ORA DAVIS; SAM WEBB; LEVON JACKSON; JOHNNY MOORE; FLOYD BASS; RAYFORD JONES; JAMES DORSEY; JERRY NORWOOD; EDWARD HARGETT, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:94-CV-317-B-A

- - - - - - - - - - March 26, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mississippi prisoner Jerry D. Graves appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies with the Mississippi Department of Corrections. Graves has not established that a monetary remedyNo. 96-60010 -2- is unavailable or that there is "doubt as to whether the agency [is] empowered to grant effective relief." McCarthy v. Madigan , 503 U.S. 140, 147 (1992). Thus, he has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing the suit because Graves disregarded its instructions to exhaust prison administrative remedies. F ED . R. C IV . P. 41(b); McCullough v. Lynaugh , 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 1988).
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 10.2


     


SECOND AMENDMENT


TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of September 2, 2008 and amended as of January 25, 2011, (the “Employment Agreement”), by and between AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) and Rajiv Datta (the “Employee”) is effective as of November 30, 2011 (this “Second Amendment”).







WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee are parties to the Employment Agreement, whose term is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2012 (the “Term”); and







WHEREAS, the parties wish to extend the Term of the Employment Agreement to December 31, 2013;







NOW THEREFORE, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:







1.           Section 1(b) of the Employment Agreement shall read as follows:







(b) The term (the “Term”) of the Employee’s employment hereunder will commence on the Effective Date and, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 6 hereof, will terminate at the end of the day on December 31, 2013.  The Term shall be automatically extended unless sooner terminated as provided herein, for successive additional one-year periods, unless at least 120 days prior to the end of Term, the Company or the Employee has notified the other that the Term will not be extended.







2.           All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in force and effect.











  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first set forth above.







 




	 	
ABOVENET, INC.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Robert Sokota	 
	 	 	

Name: Robert Sokota

	 
	 	 	

Title: SVP and General Counsel

	 
	 	 	 	 








	 	EMPLOYEE	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	


/s/ Rajiv Datta



	 
	 	

Rajiv Datta
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 835 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 

governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 

whether a child has special needs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2015 

Ms. HEITKAMP (for herself and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize 

Indian tribal governments for purposes of determining 

under the adoption credit whether a child has special 

needs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Adoption Parity 

5 Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 835 IS

1 SEC. 2. RECOGNIZING INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS FOR 

2 PURPOSES OF DETERMINING UNDER THE 

3 ADOPTION CREDIT WHETHER A CHILD HAS 

4 SPECIAL NEEDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 23(d) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining child with 

7 special needs) is amended— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘or In9 dian tribal government’’ after the words ‘‘a State’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘or In12 dian tribal government’’ after the words ‘‘such 

13 State’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

p0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141763 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141763 

 COA: 285489 

Eaton CC: 07-020436-FC 

JOEL ROBERT DIENHERT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.