40804 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 165 / Monday, August 28, 2017 / Notices 

culturally affiliated to Native American 

descendants of the Koasati/Kaskinampo. 

These descendants include the 

Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas 

(previously listed as the AlabamaCoushatta Tribes of Texas); AlabamaQuassarte Tribal Town; Coushatta Tribe 

of Louisiana; and The Muscogee (Creek) 

Nation. 

Chronicles from Spanish explorers of 

the 16th century and French explorers 

of the 17th and 18th century indicate 

the presence of chiefdom level tribal 

entities in the southeastern United 

States which resemble the Mississippian 

chiefdoms. Linguistic analysis of place 

names noted by multiple Spanish 

explorers indicates that Koasati 

speaking groups inhabited northeastern 

Alabama. Early maps and research into 

the historic Native American occupation 

of northeastern Alabama indicates that 

the Koasati (as called by the English) or 

the Kaskinampo (as called by the 

French) were found at multiple sites in 

Jackson and Marshall Counties in the 

17th and 18th centuries. Oral history, 

traditions, and expert opinions of the 

descendants of Koasati/Kaskinampo 

indicate that this portion of the 

Tennessee River valley was a homeland 

of the Koasati/Kaskinampo people. The 

subsequent involuntary diaspora of 

these peoples resulted in descendants of 

the Koasati/Kaskinampo among 

multiple federally recognized Indian 

Tribes. 

Determinations Made by the Tennessee 

Valley Authority 

Officials of the Tennessee Valley 

Authority have determined that: 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), 

the four cultural items described above 

are reasonably believed to have been 

placed with or near individual human 

remains at the time of death or later as 

part of the death rite or ceremony and 

are believed, by a preponderance of the 

evidence, to have been removed from 

specific burial sites of Native American 

individuals. 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there 

is a relationship of shared group 

identity that can be reasonably traced 

between the unassociated funerary 

objects and the Alabama-Coushatta 

Tribe of Texas (previously listed as the 

Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas); 

Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town; 

Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana; and The 

Muscogee (Creek) Nation. 

Additional Requestors and Disposition 

Lineal descendants or representatives 

of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian 

organization not identified in this notice 

that wish to claim these cultural items 

should submit a written request with 

information in support of the claim to 

Dr. Thomas O. Maher, TVA, 400 West 

Summit Hill Drive, WT11D, Knoxville, 

TN 37902–1401, telephone (865) 632– 

7458, email tomaher@tva.gov, by 

September 27, 2017. After that date, if 

no additional claimants have come 

forward, transfer of control of the 

unassociated funerary objects to the 

Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas 

(previously listed as the AlabamaCoushatta Tribes of Texas); AlabamaQuassarte Tribal Town; Coushatta Tribe 

of Louisiana; and The Muscogee (Creek) 

Nation may proceed. 

The TVA is responsible for notifying 

the Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Indians 

of Oklahoma; Alabama-Coushatta Tribe 

of Texas (previously listed as the 

Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas); 

Cherokee Nation; Coushatta Tribe of 

Louisiana; Eastern Band of Cherokee 

Indians; Mississippi Band of Choctaw 

Indians; Poarch Band of Creeks 

(previously listed as the Poarch Band of 

Creek Indians of Alabama); The 

Chickasaw Nation; The Choctaw Nation 

of Oklahoma; The Muscogee (Creek) 

Nation; The Seminole Nation of 

Oklahoma; and United Keetoowah Band 

of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma that 

this notice has been published. 

Dated: July 11, 2017. 

Melanie O’Brien, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18187 Filed 8–25–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1039] 

Certain Electronic Devices, Including 

Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and 

Components Thereof; Notice of a 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate 

the Investigation Based on a 

Settlement Agreement; Termination of 

the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 30) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting a joint motion to terminate the 

above-captioned investigation in its 

entirety based on a Settlement 

Agreement and Related Agreements. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on January 27, 2017, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of Nokia 

Technologies Oy (‘‘Nokia’’) of Espoo, 

Finland. 82 FR 8626 (Jan. 27, 2017). The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 7,415,247; 9,270,301; 

6,393,260; and 6,826,391. The 

complaint further alleges that a 

domestic industry exists. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named as respondent Apple Inc., a/k/a 

Apple Computer, Inc. (‘‘Apple’’) of 

Cupertino, California. The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is 

also participating in the investigation. 

This investigation was severed from Inv. 

No. 337–TA–1038. See Inv. No. 337– 

TA–1038, Order No. 1 (Jan. 26, 2017). 

On June 9, 2017, Nokia and Apple 

filed a joint motion to terminate the 

investigation based on a Settlement 

Agreement and Related Agreements. 

OUII filed a response indicating that it 

does not oppose the motion once Nokia 

and Apple file a revised public version 

of the motion and accompanying 

agreements. On June 21, 2017, the ALJ 

ordered the parties to file a revised 

public version of all of the agreements. 

See Order No. 26 (June 21, 2017). That 

same day, the ALJ issued Order No. 27, 

granting the motion and certifying the 

confidential version of the agreements 

to the Commission. Nokia and Apple 

jointly submitted revised public 

versions of the agreements on June 30, 

2017, and July 7, 2017. On July 19, 

2017, the Commission determined to 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 165 / Monday, August 28, 2017 / Notices 40805 

review Order No. 27, because the 

revised public versions of the 

agreements did not comply with 

Commission Rules 210.21(b) and 201.6. 

The Commission remanded the 

investigation to the ALJ to require the 

parties to file an updated public version 

of the agreements. 

On August 1, 2017, Nokia and Apple 

filed an updated public version of the 

agreements. On August 4, 2017, the ALJ 

issued the subject ID (Order No. 30) 

granting the parties’ June 9, 2017 motion 

to terminate and certified the 

confidential and public versions of the 

agreements to the Commission. On 

August 14, 2017, the ALJ issued a public 

version of the subject ID. 

No petitions for review were filed. 

The Commission has determined not to 

review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 

210. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 23, 2017. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18140 Filed 8–25–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Cooperative Research 

Group on Hedge IV 

Notice is hereby given that, on July 

25, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Southwest Research 

Institute—Cooperative Research Group 

on HEDGE IV (‘‘HEDGE IV’’) has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

changes in its membership. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of extending the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. Specifically, 

The G.I.E. Regienov, Boulogne 

Billancourt, FRANCE, has been added 

as a party to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and HEDGE IV 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On February 14, 2017, HEDGE IV filed 

its original notification pursuant to 

Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department 

of Justice published a notice in the 

Federal Register pursuant to Section 

6(b) of the Act on March 27, 2017 (82 

FR 15238). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on June 9, 2017. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on July 20, 2017 (82 FR 33516). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18173 Filed 8–25–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—ODVA, INC. 

Notice is hereby given that, on July 

27, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), ODVA, Inc. 

(‘‘ODVA’’) has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Atop Technologies Inc., 

Hsinchu, TAIWAN; Dynatronix, Inc., 

Amery, WI; PMV Automation AB, 

Solna, SWEDEN; Buerkert Werke GmbH 

& Co. KG, Ingelfingen, GERMANY; 

KEBA AG, Linz, AUSTRIA; U.I. Lapp 

GmbH, Stuttgart, GERMANY; MAC 

Valves, Inc., Wixom, MI; Lika Electronic 

Srl, Carre` (VI), ITALY; and Power 

Electronics International, Inc., East 

Dundee, IL, have been added as parties 

to this venture. 

Also, Lapp USA, Inc., Florham Park, 

NJ; Innovasic, Inc., Albuquerque, NM; 

and Beacon Global Technology, 

ChengDu, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

CHINA, have withdrawn as parties to 

this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and ODVA 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on February 15, 1996 (61 FR 6039). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on April 20, 2017. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on May 22, 2017 (82 FR 23297). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18176 Filed 8–25–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—OpenDaylight Project, 

Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on July 

26, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), OpenDaylight 

Project, Inc. (‘‘OpenDaylight’’) has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

changes in its membership. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of extending the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. Specifically, 

Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA; A10 

Networks, San Jose, CA; KEMP 

Technologies, New York, NY; Microsoft 

Corporation, Redmond, WA; ClearPath 

Networks, El Segundo, CA; Versa 

Networks, Santa Clara, CA; AlcatelLucent Enterprise, Calabasas, CA; and 

SDN Essentials, Sunnyvale, CA, have 

withdrawn as parties to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and OpenDaylight 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On May 23, 2013, OpenDaylight filed 

its original notification pursuant to 

Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department 

of Justice published a notice in the 

Federal Register pursuant to Section 

6(b) of the Act on July 1, 2013 (78 FR 

39326). 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES