alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       8,185,941
<SECURITIES>                                 6,222,284
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,468,041
<PP&E>                                       9,756,976
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,987,238)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,352,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,071,020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       174,687
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,107,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,352,875
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               522,608
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,712,884
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,986,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,986,858)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41681-41682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Disposition of Enhanced-Use Leased Property at the U.S. 
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)--Brecksville, Ohio, Campus Known as 
10000 Brecksville Road, Brecksville, OH 44141

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice of intent to dispose of real property during the term of 
an Enhanced-Use Lease (EUL).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Veterans Affairs intends to dispose of 
approximately 102 acres of property at the VA Medical Center in 
Brecksville, Ohio, which is currently being leased by the City of 
Brecksville. The Secretary has determined that VA no longer needs such 
property, and that a transfer to the City of Brecksville of all right, 
title, and interest of the United States in the property would be in 
the best interest of VA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward L. Bradley III, Office of Asset 
Enterprise Management (044), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7778 (this is not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject property consists of 
approximately 102 acres of land and improvements leased under a 75-year 
enhanced-use lease executed on Oct. 1, 2009, which is currently leased 
to the City of Brecksville. Section 8164 of title

[[Page 41682]]

38, U.S.C., authorizes the Secretary, either during or within 30 days 
after the end of the lease term, to dispose of enhanced-use leased 
property to the lessee, if the Secretary determines that the leased 
property is no longer needed by the Department, and that the disposal 
under that section, rather than via section 8118 or 8122 of such title, 
is in the best interests of the Department. The Secretary has made 
those determinations, and is providing this notice of intent to dispose 
of the subject leased property as required by section 8164 of title 38, 
U.S.C.

Signing Authority

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this 
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document 
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as 
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina S. 
Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
approved this document on August 24, 2017, for publication.

    Dated: August 24, 2017.
Jeffrey Martin,
Office Program Manager, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, 
Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017-18519 Filed 8-31-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
#### The SINGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a corporation, and Singer Sewing Machine Company, a corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Herbert AXELROD, Nathan Singer and Lester Singer, individually and as co-partners, doing business as Singer Manufacturing Company, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Oct. 13, 1954.

*461Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Nathan Stern, Brooklyn, N. Y., for defendants.

DAWSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs commenced an action for trademark infringement and unfair competition, charging that defendants have infringed upon plaintiffs’ trademarks and names “Singer”, “The Singer Manufacturing Company”, and “Singer Manufacturing Co.”

Defendants have made a demand for a “Bill of Particulars” with respect to some seven items. This procedural relic no longer exists under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and I will treat it as a request for written interrogatories under Rule 33. Plaintiffs object to interrogatories III and IV, and VI and VII. The interrogatories objected to may be delineated as those referring to other trademarks of the plaintiffs than the ones mentioned in the complaint, and those referring to damages.

Other Trademarks

In interrogatories III and IV, defendants seek information as to all marks or names used by the plaintiffs or their predecessors other than “The Singer Manufacturing Company”, and as to what business is transacted under each of these marks, including “The Singer Manufacturing Company”.

All marks or names other than “Singer”, “The Singer Manufacturing Company”, and “Singer Manufacturing Co.” are not relevant to this proceeding. See Stanley Works v. C. S. Mersick & Co., D.C.Conn.1939, 1 F.R.D. 43; 4 Moore’s Fed. Prac., 2d Ed., 2300, 2301. However, plaintiffs shall answer so much of the interrogatory as asks what business was transacted by the plaintiffs under the marks or names “Singer”, “The Singer Manufacturing Company”, and “Singer Manufacturing Co.” Other than as so limited, plaintiffs need not answer interrogatories III and IV.

Damages

Interrogatories VI and VII concern themselves exclusively with damages. Where, as here, an accounting is demanded, questions relating to damages should await a determination of infringement and a right to an accounting. Gagen v. Northam Warren Corp., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1953, 15 F.R.D. 44; Zenith Radio Corp. v. Dictograph Products Co., Inc., D.C.Del.1947, 6 F.R.D. 597; Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Dubois Brewing Co., D.C.W.D.Pa.1943, 3 F.R.D. 336; 4 Moore’s Fed.Prae., 2d Ed., 1072. Interrogatories VI and VII need not be answered at this time.

So ordered.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS APPEARING IN THE FORM 10-Q TO WHICH
THIS SCHEDULE IS AN EXHIBIT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      15,225,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,204,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,815,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,428,000
<PP&E>                                      20,597,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,219,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,189,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,988,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        84,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,159,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,189,000
<SALES>                                      7,242,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,721,000
<CGS>                                        1,048,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,448,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               216,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             323,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                492,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   187,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            305,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   305,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THOMAS LEE AVERETT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT; PAUL PENZONE,*

Defendants-Appellees. 

No. 16-15352 

D.C. No. 2:16-cv-00163-DLRMHB 

MEMORANDUM**

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2017***

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, 

Circuit Judges.

Thomas Lee Averett, an Arizona state prisoner and former pretrial detainee, 

appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

 

* Paul Penzone has been substituted for his predecessor, Joseph Arpaio, 

as Maricopa County Sheriff under Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 

action alleging constitutional violations arising from defendants’ alleged policy of 

allowing female guards to observe male pretrial detainees showering and using the 

bathroom on a daily basis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A). 

Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We vacate and remand.

Averett alleged in his complaint that defendants’ policy of allowing female 

detention officers to view Averett while showering and performing bodily 

functions violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights. The district court dismissed 

Averett’s deliberate indifference claim at the screening stage. However, the 

district court did not have the benefit of our recent decision in Byrd v. Maricopa 

County Board of Supervisors, 845 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2017), which held that 

dismissal under § 1915(A) of a pretrial detainee’s action alleging constitutional 

claims arising from a similar policy was premature. We vacate the district court’s 

judgment and remand for further proceedings.

We do not consider allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See 

Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Averett’s request for appointment of counsel, set forth in his opening brief,

is denied.

VACATED and REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
     with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"), I, Gerardo Canet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
     certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
     of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                                                 /s/Gerardo Canet
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Gerardo Canet
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    August 13, 2004



Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
any other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,937
<SECURITIES>                                    10,178
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                        43
<INVENTORY>                                      5,812
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,749
<PP&E>                                           6,162
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,731
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,015
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,842
<SALES>                                          7,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,278
<CGS>                                            1,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    17
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (230)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (230)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (113)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17852]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Performance Review Board Membership

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) publishes the names 
of the members selected to serve on its SES Performance Review Board 
(PRB). This notice supersedes all previous notices of the PRB 
membership.

DATES: June 28, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Whittle Spooner, 202-395-4665.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C. requires 
each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Office of Personnel Management, one or more PRBs. The PRB shall 
review and evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior executive's 
performance by the supervisor, along with any response by the senior 
executive, and make recommendations to the final rating authority 
relative to the performance of the senior executive.
    The persons named below have been selected to serve on OMB's PRB.

Dustin S. Brown, Deputy Assistant Director for Management
Kelly T. Colyar, Chief, Water and Power Branch
Michael J. Hickey, Chief, Environment Branch
Barry D. King, Chief, Operations and Support Branch
Kirsten J. Moncada, Chief, Privacy Branch
Sarah Whittle Spooner, Assistant Director for Management and Operations

Sarah Whittle Spooner,
Assistant Director for Management and Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017-17852 Filed 8-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>

THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A
KNOWING OR WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATION.



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20549

         Re: Nuveen Investments, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the "Company") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

                  (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Dated as of this 4th day of August 2005.


                                        /s/ Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, September 14, 2017, 2 p.m. (Open Portion) 2:15 p.m. (Closed Portion).

# PLACE:

Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Meeting Open to the Public from 2 p.m. to 2:15 p.m., Closed portion will commence at 2:15 p.m. (approx.).

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. President's Report.

2. Minutes of the Open Session of the June 15, 2017, Board of Directors Meeting.

# FURTHER MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED

**(Closed to the Public 2:15 p.m.):**

1. Proposed FY 2019 Budget.

2. Insurance Project—Ukraine.

3. Finance Project—Costa Rica.

4. Minutes of the Closed Session of the June 15, 2017, Board of Directors Meeting.

                        5. Reports and Budget.                              ( print page 40604)    

6. Pending Projects.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Information on the meeting may be obtained from Catherine F. I. Andrade at (202) 336-8768, or via email at                         *Catherine.Andrade@opic.gov.*

Dated: August 22, 2017.

Catherine Andrade,

Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

[FR Doc. 2017-18143 Filed 8-23-17; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 3210-01-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Aerosonic Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Douglas J. Hillman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:     May 2, 2011
By:
/S/ DOUGLAS J. HILLMANDouglas J. HillmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
     The undersigned officer of DATATRAK International, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify,to such officer’s knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1.  the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.        Dated: May 13, 2005 /s/ Terry C. Black   Terry C. Black   Chief Financial Officer