U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 1

Employer-provided "Quality-of-life" Benefits for Workers in Private Industry, 2007

by George I. Long

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Originally Posted: October 24, 2007

The National Compensation Survey provides data on "quality-of-life" benefits in its annual benefits summary publications.

Although a relatively small percent of workers have access to these kinds of benefits, the data give insight into ways that

employers and employees are working toward more family- and environmentally friendly work arrangements.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics National Compensation Survey (NCS) collects data on the percent of employees with access

to a wide range of employer-provided benefits.1 Some types of employer-provided benefits are more commonly available

than others. As shown in the most recent NCS publication of benefits data, 61 percent of workers in private industry have

access to retirement benefits, 71 percent have access to medical plans, and 77 percent have access to paid holidays and

paid vacation time.2 By comparison, employee access to various "quality-of-life" benefits is relatively uncommon. (See chart

1.)

Nevertheless, the NCS quality-of-life benefits data give insight into the type of work arrangements that workers value and

some employers promote. These benefits have a potential for influencing how people get to work, how they conduct their

work, and the extent to which they are connected with their families and fellow workers. Therefore, a closer look at worker

access to quality-of-life benefits--by occupation, bargaining status, wage level, establishment size, and area in which the

worker is employed--is of value.

Quality-of-life Benefits For Private Industry Workers

Chart 1 shows the percent of workers with access to a variety of quality-of-life benefits for all workers in private industry.

Long-term care insurance, childcare assistance, and adoption assistance are more than twice as likely to be available than

are subsidized commuting, flexible workplace, and employer-provided home personal computer (PC) benefits. (See exhibit

for NCS definitions of these benefits.)

Employer assistance for childcare. Parental participation in the workforce often depends on access to formal childcare

arrangements.3 In 2007, 15 percent of workers in private industry had access to employer-provided childcare assistance,

which includes funds, on-site or off-site childcare, and resource and referral services. For some workers, childcare needs
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 2

may be covered by a different employee benefit, dependent care reimbursement accounts, which set aside money to be used

to pay for expenses including childcare, eldercare, or services to a disabled dependent. In 2007, 31 percent of workers in

private industry had access to dependent care reimbursement accounts.4

Adoption assistance. Of the more than 72 million children under 18 years old in the United States,5 1.6 million (or 2.2

percent) are adopted.6 The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reports that 51,000 children were adopted with

public agency involvement in Fiscal Year 2005.7 The cost of adopting a child can range from $5,000 to $40,000, depending

on the agency and source.8 In 2007, 11 percent of all private industry workers had access to employer-provided adoption

assistance.

Long-term care insurance. Long-term care insurance has become a sought-after form of insurance as baby boomers

prepare for retirement.9 NCS data on access to long-term care insurance includes workers who have access to a group plan

as well as those whose employer subsidizes the cost of individual plans. In 2007, 12 percent of private industry workers had

access to such plans.

Subsidized commuting. The American public made 9.8 billion trips on public transit in 2005.10 By this measure, public

transit use has increased steadily over the past decade. Approximately half of these trips were for commuting to and from

work.11 With current concerns about the global impact of modern living, gasoline price uncertainty, and increasing traffic

congestion, commuting by public transit may offer some solutions.12 In 2007, only 5 percent of private industry workers had

access to commuter subsidies.

Flexible workplace. With the advent of the personal computer and the Internet, it became possible for more types of work,

particularly those of professional and technical workers, to be conducted effectively off site, and often from home.13

Increased employee productivity, reduced stress, cost savings, and emergency preparedness have been cited as some of

the positive effects of flexible workplace programs.14 Flexible workplace arrangements are sometimes referred to as

"teleworking" or "telecommuting," although it is uncertain to what extent flexible workplaces are displacing the traditional daily

commute to work.

The NCS definition of flexible workplace is quite restrictive, requiring a formal program; informal plans are not included. In

2007, 5 percent of workers in private industry had access to flexible workplace benefits. By contrast, the Office of Personnel

Management reports that approximately 70 percent of Federal workers were eligible to telework during 2005, and 6.6 percent

of the Federal workforce (9.5 percent of those eligible) participated in teleworking. Of those who participated, 60 percent

teleworked at least 1 day per week.15

Employer-provided home personal computer (PC). Only 2 percent of employers provide workers with a home PC in 2007.

This does not include a personal home computer provided by an employer only as part of a flexible workplace arrangement.

Quality-of-life Benefits By Worker And Establishment Characteristics

While most subsets of workers followed a similar pattern of access to quality-of-life benefits as did all workers in private

industry, some groups showed notable differences. Chart 2 shows employee access to quality-of-life benefits by major

occupational group.16 Management, professional, and related occupations had greater access to each of the quality-of-life

benefits than did any other occupational group. Sales and office workers were the next most likely to have access to the

quality-of-life benefits. Workers in service occupations; natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations; and

production, transportation, and material moving occupations had less access to these benefits.
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 3

Chart 3 shows that about 15 percent of full-time workers had access to childcare and long-term care benefits, while fewer

than 10 percent of part-time workers had access to these benefits. Part-time workers were less than half as likely as full-time

workers to have access to adoption assistance.

Chart 4 shows that union workers had greater access to childcare assistance, adoption assistance and long-term care

insurance than did nonunion workers. Flexible workplace arrangements, while relatively uncommon, are more prevalent

among nonunion workers than among union workers, most likely due to union workers’ greater representation in

manufacturing and construction occupations, which require work on site, than in professional, managerial, and office and

administrative occupations, which had a lower percentage of unionized workers.17
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 4

Chart 5 shows that more than 20 percent of workers earning $15 or more per hour had access to childcare assistance, while

less than 10 percent of workers earning less than $15 per hour had such access. The disparity among workers by wage level

was notable in each of these benefit categories.

Chart 6 shows that workers employed in establishments with 100 or more workers had much greater access to almost every

type of quality-of-life benefit than workers employed in smaller firms. Workers in large firms were 4 to 5 times as likely as

workers in smaller firms to have access to childcare, adoption, and long-term care insurance benefits.
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 5

Chart 7 shows that workers in metropolitan areas were more likely to have each of the quality-of-life benefits than did workers

in nonmetropolitan areas. Public transit systems are more common in metropolitan than nonmetropolitan areas, which might

account for the greater access to subsidized commuting among workers in metropolitan areas.

Occupational and establishment characteristics and location of establishment are factors that are most likely to influence the

percent of workers who have access to quality-of-life benefits; however, these factors overlap to some extent. For example,

workers in metropolitan areas receive average wages of more than $15 per hour, and workers in larger firms earn, on

average, more than those in smaller firms. Thus, if workers who earn more than $15 per hour are more likely to receive

certain benefits, it could be related to the fact that many of them work in larger firms and in metropolitan areas.18

NOTE: Standard errors have not been calculated for NCS benefits estimates. Consequently, none of the statistical inferences

made in this report could be verified by a statistical test.

George I. Long

Economist, Division of Compensation Data Analysis and Planning, Office of Compensation and Working Conditions, Bureau of
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 6

Labor Statistics.

Telephone: (202) 691-6210; E-mail: Long.George@bls.gov

Notes

1 As defined by the National Compensation Survey, "an employee has access to a benefit plan if the employee is in an occupation that is

offered the plan." By definition, either all employees in an occupation have access to a benefit or none has access.

2 National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in Private Industry in the United States, March 2007, Summary 07-05 (Bureau of Labor

Statistics, August 2007), tables 1, 5, and 19; available on the Internet at http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/sp/ebsm0006.pdf.

3 See "The National Economic Impacts of the Child Care Sector," (The National Child Care Association, Fall 2002), p.2.; available on the

Internet at http://www.nccanet.org/NCCA%20Impact%20Study.pdf; also, Women in the Labor Force: A Databook, Report 985 (Bureau of Labor

Statistics, May 2005), tables 5-7, pp. 13-21; available on the Internet at http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2005.pdf.

4 National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in Private Industry in the United States, March 2007, table 24; available on the Internet at

http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/sp/ebsm0006.pdf. See technical note for the NCS definition of dependent care reimbursement accounts.

5 See "America’s Families and Living Arrangements, March 2000", Current Population Report P20-537 (U.S. Census Bureau, June 2001),

table C1, detailed tables, on the Internet at http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam/p20-537_00.html.

6 See "Adopted Children and Stepchildren: 2000", Census 2000 Special Report CENSR-6RV (U.S. Census Bureau, October 2003),

supplemental tables, table 1, "Selected Characteristics of Children of the Householder by Type of Relationship and Sex of Child for the United

States: 2000"; available on the Internet at http://www.census.gov/population/cen2000/phc-t21/tab01.pdf.

7 The AFCARS Report: Preliminary FY 2005 Estimates as of September 2006 (13), (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,

Children’s Bureau); available on the Internet at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/stats_research/afcars/tar/report13.htm.

8 For more information on adoption-specific expenses, see Child Welfare Information Gateway, Costs of Adopting: Factsheet for Families

(U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau); available on the Internet at http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/s_cost/

s_costb.cfm.

9 For more information, see Jordan Pfuntner and Elizabeth Dietz, "Long-term Care Insurance Gains Prominence," Compensation and Working

Conditions Online (Bureau of Labor Statistics, January 28, 2004); available on the Internet at http://www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/

cm20040123ar01p1.htm.

10 See "Unlinked Passenger Trips by Mode" (American Public Transportation Association, Washington, DC); available on the Internet at http://

www.apta.com/research/stats/ridership/trips.cfm.

11 See "Purpose of Trips by Population Group" (American Public Transportation Association, Washington, DC); available on the Internet at

http://www.apta.com/research/stats/ridership/purpose.cfm.

12 "Linking Solutions to Problems: Traffic Congestion and Reliability: Linking Solutions to Problems," prepared for the Federal Highway

Administration by Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 100 Cambridge Park Drive, Suite 400, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140; with Texas

Transportation Institute, July 19, 2004.

13 For more information on workers using computers and the Internet, see Computer and Internet Use at Work in 2003, USDL 05-1457 (U.S.

Department of Labor), August 2, 2005; available on the Internet at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ciuaw.pdf.

14 Status of Telework in the Federal Government: Report to the Congress (U.S. Office of Personnel Management, June 2007), pp. 11-13;

available on the Internet at http://www.telework.gov/surveys/2006_TW20Report.pdf.

15 Ibid., pp. 2, 5-8.

16 For recent changes in the NCS occupational classifications, see "Change is coming to the NCS benefits products," on the Internet at http://

www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/ebsm0005.htm.

17 Union Members in 2006, USDL 07-0113 (U.S. Department of Labor), January 25, 2007, table 3; available on the Internet at http://

www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm.

18 See National Compensation Survey: Occupational Wages in the United States, June 2005, Bulletin 2581 (Bureau of Labor Statistics,

August 2006), table 1; available on the Internet at: http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncbl0832.pdf.
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 7

Exhibit. National Compensation Survey definitions:

Childcare provided by the employer can be as follows: • Assistance in the form of funds only; • Child care in an on- or off-site facility; or • Resource or referral services

Adoption assistance is financial aid to either single or married employees, as reimbursement for all or part of the cost of

adopting a child.

Long-term care insurance pays full or partial benefits for long-term (more than 1 year) custodial care, home care, or nursing

home care. Premiums are generally, though not necessarily always, employee paid. Coverage may be extended to active

employees, retirees, parents of active employees, or to dependents of active employees and retirees. These plans are

separate from coverage for extended care facilities or home health care found in health insurance plans. Typically, health

insurance plans provide post-hospitalization benefits for a limited period (such as 60 or 120 days) and are usually restricted

to convalescent rather than custodial care.

Flexible workplace is a formal program that allows employees who would otherwise work on-site at the establishment to

work part or all of their work schedule at home. The following situations are typical, but not required, to meet the NCS

definition: • Flexible workplace may be associated with occupations or establishments in which work can be done by computer

and electronically transmitted to the work site; • Some employers may require workers on flexible workplace to be at the work site for a specified amount of time each

week, month, etc.; • An employer may pay costs associated with flexible workplace, such as computer installation costs.

Employer-provided personal home computers is a benefit that helps the employer by giving the employee access to

company data and the employee’s work projects. If the employee cannot go to the office, he or she may still be productive by

using a personal home computer. Employers may purchase the computers outright and provide them to employees. This

does not include home personal computers loaned by the employer as part of a flexible workplace agreement. Other options

include the following: • Allowing employees to lease computers at a nominal rate with the employee owning the computer at the end of the

lease. • Providing loans to employees at low or no interest rates. • Employer-provided subsidies or grants to employees for purchasing a computer.

Subsidized commuting provides full or partial payment for the cost of an employee's commute to work via public

transportation, a company sponsored van pool, discount subway fares, or bus tokens. Use of a company car does not qualify

as subsidized commuting.

Data for Chart 1. Percent of workers with access to selected "quality of life" benefits, all workers, private industry,

March 2007

Employer assistance

for childcare

Adoption

assistance

Long-term care

insurance

Flexible

workplace

Employer-provided

home PC

Subsidized

commuting

All

Workers 15 11 12 5 2 5
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 8

Data for Chart 2. Percent of workers with access to selected "quality of life" benefits, by occupational group, private

industry, March 2007

Occupation

Employer

assistance for

childcare

Adoption

assistance

Long-term

care insurance

Flexible

workplace

Employerprovided home

PC

Subsidized

commuting

Management,

professional and related

occupations

27 20 22 11 6 11

Sales and office

occupations 14 12 15 5 2 6

Production,

transportation, and

material moving

occupations

10 9 9 2 2 2

Service occupations 10 3 5 1 (-) 2

Natural resources,

construction, and

maintenance occupations

6 7 7 1 1 4

Data for Chart 3. Percent of workers with access to selected "quality of life" benefits, by full- and part-time status,

private industry, March 2007

Employer assistance for

childcare

Adoption

assistance

Long-term care

insurance

Flexible

workplace

Employer-provided

home PC

Subsidized

commuting

Fulltime 16 12 15 5 3 6

Parttime 9 5 6 2 1 2

Data for Chart 4. Percent of workers with access to selected "quality of life" benefits, by bargaining status, private

industry, March 2007

Employer assistance

for childcare

Adoption

assistance

Long-term care

insurance

Flexible

workplace

Employer-provided

home PC

Subsidized

commuting

Union 21 15 17 2 2 6

Nonunion 14 10 12 5 3 5

Data for Chart 5. Percent of workers with access to selected "quality of life" benefits, by wage group, private industry,

March 2007

Employer assistance

for childcare

Adoption

assistance

Long-term care

insurance

Flexible

workplace

Employer-provided

home PC

Subsidized

commuting

Less than

$15 per

hour

9 5 7 2 1 2

$15 per

hour or

higher

22 17 19 8 5 9
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 9

Data for Chart 6. Percent of workers with access to selected "quality of life" benefits, by size of establishment, private

industry, March 2007

Employer assistance

for childcare

Adoption

assistance

Long-term care

insurance

Flexible

workplace

Employer-provided

home PC

Subsidized

commuting

1 to 99

workers 5 4 4 3 1 3

100

workers

or more

25 18 21 6 4 8

Data for Chart 7. Percent of workers with access to selected "quality of life" benefits, by area, private industry, March

2007

Employer assistance

for childcare

Adoption

assistance

Long-term care

insurance

Flexible

workplace

Employerprovided home PCSubsidized

commuting

Metropolitan 16 12 14 5 3 6

Nonmetropolitan 7 4 6 (1) (1) 2

Footnotes:

(1) Less than 0.5 percent.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Division of Information and Marketing Services, PSB Suite 2850, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC

20212-0001 | www.bls.gov/OPUB | Telephone: 1-202-691-5200 | Contact Us