alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

 

I, Andrew Traeger, Vice President and Controller of John Deere Capital Corporation, certify:

 

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from April 10, 2013 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2013 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through October 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 10, 2013 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2013 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 
| Date:   January 8, 2014 | John   Deere Capital Corporation |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                         |                             |
|                         |                             |
|                         |                             |
|                         | By                               | /s/   *Andrew Traeger* |   |
|                         |                             | Andrew   Traeger |   |
|                         |                             | Vice   President and Controller |   |

 

----
THE A-rrom GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

AU-TIN. TEXAS 78711 

November 9, 1965 

Honorable Charles A. Allen opinion NO. c-538 

Criminal District Attorney 

Harrison County Re: 

P. o. BOX 776 

Under the stated facts, 

whether the hospital bill 

Marshall, Texas and the doctor bill of 

the person charged with 

an aS6aUlt to murder is 

the responsibility of 

Dear Mr. Allen: Harrison County. 

Your letter requesting the opinion of this department on 

the above~ stated question read6 in part as follows: 

,:"Whlle Investigating a failure to stop 

and -glve:~lnformation after an accident, a 

deputy sheriff called a highway patrolman 

and they subsequently located the vehicle 

believed to be the vehicle involved in the 

accident. The deputy sheriff and the 

highway patrolman started to walk to a 

.house where the vehicle wa6 parked and 

~. from a concealed place within the house, a 

man opened fire, shooting the deputy sheriff 

In the right chest, and while attempting to 

reload-the rifle, one of the officers shot 

the assailant, Seriously injuring him. 

."The officer radioed for an ambulance 

and .the assailant and the deputy sheriff 

were carried to the hospital. The assailant was filed on for A66aUlt with Intent 

to Murder, and a hold wa6 placed on him 

at the hospital. He was Subsequently indicted for AS6aUlt with Intent to Murder 

by the Grand Jury." 

Article 1037, Vernon's Code of Criminal Procedure, provides: 

"Each county shall be liable for all 

expense incurred on account of the safe 

keeping of prisoners confined in jail or 

kept under guard, except prisoners brought 

from another county for safe keeping, or 

-257-I- 
Hon. Charles A. Allen, page 2 (c-538) 

on habeas corpu6 or change of venue; in 

which case6, the county from which the 

prisoner is brought shall be liable for 

the expense of his safe keeping." 

This office held In Attorney General'6 Opinion O-IL708 

(1942) that a county is liable for the necessary and reasonable 

medical expenses of a prisoner during illness when the prisoner 

is confined in .jail or under guard. The reasonableness, as well 

as the just and proper amount of the charge6 for such medical 

treatment is a matter to be determined by the Commissioner6 

Court. 

Since the assailant, while In custody of the sheriff, was 

in need of medical care, and 6UCh care wa6 furnished him, the 

county became liable for hi6 safe keeping and should pay his 

necessary medical expenses. 

SUMMARY 

A County is responsible for the necessary 

hospital care and treatment by a doctor 

of a prisoner while in the custady of the 

sheriff. 

Yours very truly, 

wipGmER CARR 

Attorney General of Texas 

4if@dmjMU BY ’ 

Roward M. Fender 

AsSiStant Attorney General 

HMF:sss 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

John Reeves 

Gordon Cass 

Robert E. Owen 

John Banks 

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

BY: T. B. Wright 

-2578-
Exhibit 10.3

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED

JANUARY 6, 2011 BETWEEN MTR GAMING GROUP, INC.,

AND JEFFREY J. DAHL

 

WHEREAS, MTR Gaming Group, Inc. (“MTR or the Company”), and Jeffrey J. Dahl (the “Executive”) (collectively the “Parties”), entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) on or about January 6, 2011 securing the employment of Executive as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company;

 

WHEREAS, the Parties, in exchange for the consideration detailed below, the sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the Parties mutually desire to amend the Agreement as follows:

 

	
Section 5, COMPENSATION &   BENEFITS:
    	
 
    	
(a) Executive’s base   salary is being raised to $630,000.00; and
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
(b) Executive’s Annual Incentive Bonus Target is being raised from fifty   percent (50%) to sixty percent (60%)
    


 

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that other than the specific sections described above, all other Terms of the Agreement remain in force and are specifically incorporated by reference herein.

 

WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby affix their signature below, intending to be legally bound and specifically agreeing to the terms of this First Amendment this 2nd Day of December 2011.

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Jeffrey J. Dahl
    	
 
    	
/s/ Roger Wagner
    
	
JEFFREY J. DAHL
    	
 
    	
ROGER WAGNER
    
	
PRESIDENT AND C.E.O.
   MTR GAMING GROUP, INC.
    	
 
    	
AS, CHAIRMAN OF MTR GAMING GROUP, INC.’S   COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Dated: 2 December, 2011
    	
 
    	
Dated: 2 December, 2011
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/ Steven M. Billick
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
STEVEN M. BILLICK
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
AS, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
MTR GAMING GROUP, INC.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Health Fitness
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2003 (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Jerry V. Noyce, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.   The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
         78o(d)); and

    2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



/s/  Jerry V. Noyce


Jerry V. Noyce
Chief Executive Officer
Health Fitness Corporation
August 12, 2003
#### In re SANG SU LEE.

No. 2007-1191.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 22, 2008.

Robert E. Bushnell, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Richard H. Stern.

Thomas W. Krause, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor, and Raymond T. Chen, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was Sydney O. Johnson, Jr., Associate Solicitor.

NEWMAN, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit (23)(e)

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and in the related Prospectuses:

      (1)   Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-120611) of Consumers Energy
            Company, and

      (2)   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-76347) pertaining to the
            Employee Savings Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Consumers
            Energy Company;

of our reports dated February 21, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Consumers Energy Company, Consumers Energy
Company management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Consumers Energy Company, included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Detroit, Michigan
February 21, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

IN THE INT. OF : M.B. 

PETITION OF: DAUPHIN COUNTY 

CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 174 MM 2014 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the 

Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Review of Emergency 

Supersedeas Order Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P 3315 and Motion to Vacate is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           49785
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     7081
<MORTGAGE>                                     182
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  4066
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 65137
<CASH>                                         6546
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             112
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         3553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 85639
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                41805
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            213
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 889
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          16076
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                9192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          4044
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1276
<OTHER-SE>                                     10017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   85639
<PREMIUMS>                                     4503
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            1024
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             591
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 4
<BENEFITS>                                     2395
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    387
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           1945
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                695
<INCOME-TAX>                                   125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            570
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   570
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .37
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                               GLASSMASTER COMPANY
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     For the two years ended August 31, 1999
                    (Thousands except for per share figures)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     1999        1998
                                                                    -------      ------
<S>                                                                 <C>          <C>
Primary:
  Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations                          $  (996)     $  119
  Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations                              0           0
                                                                    -------      ------
  Net Income(Loss)                                                  $  (996)     $  119
                                                                    =======      ======
Basic:
  Average Shares Outstanding                                          1,629       1,626

  Per Share Amounts:
          Continuing Operations                                     $  (.61)     $  .07
          Discontinued Operations                                         0           0
                                                                    -------      ------
          Net Income (Loss)                                         $  (.61)     $  .07
Diluted:
  Average Shares Outstanding                                          1,629       1,626
  Net effect of dilutive stock options under the treasury stock
   method using the average market price                                  0           0
                                                                    -------      ------
      Total                                                           1,629       1,626

  Per Share Amounts:
          Continuing Operations                                     $  (.61)     $  .07
          Discontinued Operations                                         0           0
                                                                    -------      ------
          Net Income (Loss)                                         $  (.61)     $  .07
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7243

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

O’NEAL MCGILL, a/k/a James Owens, a/k/a Hard

Times,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CR-97-166-12-3-MU)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: January 31, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

O’Neal McGill, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

O’Neal McGill appeals from the district court’s order denying

his motion to correct his name on his criminal judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because McGill’s notice of

appeal was not timely filed.

Defendants in criminal cases have ten days within which to

file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or

final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1). This time period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” United States v. Raynor, 939 F.2d 191,

197 (4th Cir. 1991). The only exception to the appeal period is

when the district court grants an extension “[u]pon a finding of

excusable neglect or good cause.” Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4).

The district court’s order was entered on August 11, 2000.

McGill filed his notice of appeal on August 24, 2000. See Houston

v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). McGill’s failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 1

Family Time Flexibility Act Introduced in Congress

by John Buckley

Originally Posted: May 28, 2003

On March 6, 2003, a bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act to

provide compensatory time for employees in the private sector. The Family Time Flexibility Act (HR 1119) provides

employees an option to receive, in lieu of overtime pay, compensatory time off at a rate not less than one and one-half hours

for each hour of employment for which overtime compensation is required.

If the bill becomes law, an employer may provide compensatory time to qualifying employees only if such time is provided in

accordance with existing collective bargaining agreements or by a voluntary agreement between the employer and employee

where no collective bargaining agreement exists. An employer who has adopted a policy of offering compensatory time may

discontinue the policy after giving employees 30 days notice, except where a collective bargaining agreement provides

otherwise. An employee may withdraw from the voluntary agreement at any time.

The text of the bill is available on the Library of Congress website.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Division of Information and Marketing Services, PSB Suite 2850, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC

20212-0001 | www.bls.gov/OPUB | Telephone: 1-202-691-5200 | Contact Us
EXHIBIT 12.2
 
        1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Evogene Ltd.;
  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the company and have:
  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 /s/ Alex Taskar
   
 28
| (logo) Rialto 

CAPITAL |  

  |
|-------------------------|----------------|

 

 

 

2014 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of  May 1, 2013  by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC as Operating Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank,  National Association as Certificate Administrator and Custodian, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee relating to the GS Mortgage Trust 2013-GCJ12, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-GCJ12  **(GSMS 2013-GCJ12)**

            

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

 

Certified by:  /s/  Adam Singer                                                Date:  March 5, 2015

                      Adam Singer, Managing Director
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Black Cactus Global, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence P. Cummins, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: July 29, 2020/s/ Lawrence P. Cummins
Lawrence P. Cummins
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)