Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices 41595 

Commerce, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, 

M/S 243, Reston, VA 20192. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Middle Class Tax Relief and Job 

Creation Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112–96, 

Title VI, 126 Stat. 256 (codified at 47 

U.S.C. 1401 et seq.)) (the ‘‘Act’’) created 

and authorized FirstNet to take all 

actions necessary to ensure the building, 

deployment, and operation of an 

interoperable, nationwide public safety 

broadband network (‘‘NPSBN’’) based 

on a single, national network 

architecture. The Act meets a 

longstanding and critical national 

infrastructure need, to create a single, 

nationwide network that will, for the 

first time, allow police officers, fire 

fighters, emergency medical service 

professionals, and other public safety 

entities to effectively communicate with 

each other across agencies and 

jurisdictions. The NPSBN is intended to 

enhance the ability of the public safety 

community to perform more reliably, 

effectively, and safely; increase 

situational awareness during an 

emergency; and improve the ability of 

the public safety community to 

effectively engage in those critical 

activities. 

The National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4347) 

(‘‘NEPA’’) requires federal agencies to 

undertake an assessment of 

environmental effects of their proposed 

actions prior to making a final decision 

and implementing the action. NEPA 

requirements apply to any federal 

project, decision, or action that may 

have a significant impact on the quality 

of the human environment. NEPA also 

establishes the Council on 

Environmental Quality (‘‘CEQ’’), which 

issued regulations implementing the 

procedural provisions of NEPA (see 40 

CFR parts 1500–1508). Among other 

considerations, CEQ regulations at 40 

CFR 1508.28 recommend the use of 

tiering from a ‘‘broader environmental 

impact statement (such as a national 

program or policy statements) with 

subsequent narrower statements or 

environmental analysis (such as 

regional or basin wide statements or 

ultimately site-specific statements) 

incorporating by reference the general 

discussions and concentrating solely on 

the issues specific to the statement 

subsequently prepared.’’ 

Due to the geographic scope of 

FirstNet (all 50 states, the District of 

Columbia, and five territories) and the 

diversity of ecosystems potentially 

traversed by the project, FirstNet has 

elected to prepare five regional PEISs. 

The five PEISs are divided into the East, 

Central, West, South, and NonContiguous Regions. The Central Region 

consists of Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, 

Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, 

Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North 

Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Utah, 

Wyoming, and Wisconsin. The Final 

PEIS analyzes potential impacts of the 

deployment and operation of the 

NPSBN on the natural and human 

environment in the Central Region, in 

accordance with FirstNet’s 

responsibilities under NEPA. 

Now that this PEIS has been 

completed and once a Record of 

Decision (ROD) has been signed, the 

proposed FirstNet projects can begin to 

submit the site-specific environmental 

documentation to determine if the 

proposed project has been adequately 

evaluated in the PEIS or whether it 

instead warrants a Categorical 

Exclusion, an Environmental 

Assessment, or an Environmental 

Impact Statement. 

Dated: August 28, 2017. 

Amanda Goebel Pereira, 

NEPA Coordinator, First Responder Network 

Authority, Om. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18534 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–60–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may 

request, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213, that the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) conduct an 

administrative review of that 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

comments or actions by the Department 

discussed below refer to the number of 

calendar days from the applicable 

starting date. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, the 

Department intends to select 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. 

imports during the period of review. We 

intend to release the CBP data under 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

to all parties having an APO within five 

days of publication of the initiation 

notice and to make our decision 

regarding respondent selection within 

21 days of publication of the initiation 

Federal Register notice. Therefore, we 

encourage all parties interested in 

commenting on respondent selection to 

submit their APO applications on the 

date of publication of the initiation 

notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. 

The Department invites comments 

regarding the CBP data and respondent 

selection within five days of placement 

of the CBP data on the record of the 

review. 

In the event the Department decides 

it is necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, the Department finds that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, the Department 

will not conduct collapsing analyses at 

the respondent selection phase of a 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this antidumping 

proceeding (i.e., investigation, 

administrative review, new shipper 

review or changed circumstances 

review). For any company subject to a 

review, if the Department determined, 

or continued to treat, that company as 

collapsed with others, the Department 

will assume that such companies 

continue to operate in the same manner 

and will collapse them for respondent 

selection purposes. Otherwise, the 

Department will not collapse companies 

for purposes of respondent selection. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
41596 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices 

1Or the next business day, if the deadline falls 

on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day 

when the Department is closed. 

Parties are requested to (a) identify 

which companies subject to review 

previously were collapsed, and (b) 

provide a citation to the proceeding in 

which they were collapsed. Further, if 

companies are requested to complete a 

Quantity and Value Questionnaire for 

purposes of respondent selection, in 

general each company must report 

volume and value data separately for 

itself. Parties should not include data 

for any other party, even if they believe 

they should be treated as a single entity 

with that other party. If a company was 

collapsed with another company or 

companies in the most recently 

completed segment of a proceeding 

where the Department considered 

collapsing that entity, complete quantity 

and value data for that collapsed entity 

must be submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that requests a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that the Department 

may extend this time if it is reasonable 

to do so. In order to provide parties 

additional certainty with respect to 

when the Department will exercise its 

discretion to extend this 90-day 

deadline, interested parties are advised 

that, with regard to reviews requested 

on the basis of anniversary months on 

or after September 2017, the Department 

does not intend to extend the 90-day 

deadline unless the requestor 

demonstrates that an extraordinary 

circumstance prevented it from 

submitting a timely withdrawal request. 

Determinations by the Department to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

The Department is providing this 

notice on its Web site, as well as in its 

‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative 

Review’’ notices, so that interested 

parties will be aware of the manner in 

which the Department intends to 

exercise its discretion in the future. 

Opportunity To Request a Review: Not 

later than the last day of September 

2017,1 interested parties may request 

administrative review of the following 

orders, findings, or suspended 

investigations, with anniversary dates in 

September for the following periods: 

Period of review 

Antidumping duty proceedings period of review 

BELARUS: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A–822–804 ................................................................................................. 9/1/16–8/31/17 

BRAZIL: Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, A–351–843 ....................................................................................................... 3/7/16–8/31/17 

INDIA: 

Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, A–533–865 .............................................................................................................. 3/7/16–8/31/17 

Lined Paper Products, A–533–843 .............................................................................................................................. 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Oil Country Tubular Goods, A–533–857 ...................................................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

INDONESIA: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A–560–811 .............................................................................................. 9/1/16–8/31/17 

JAPAN: Stainless Steel Wire Rod, A–588–843 .................................................................................................................. 9/1/16–8/31/17 

LATVIA: Stainless Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A–449–804 ............................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

MEXICO: 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes, A–201–847 ...................................................... 3/1/16–8/31/17 

Magnesia Carbon Bricks, A–201–837 .......................................................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

MOLDOVA: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A–841–804 ................................................................................................ 9/1/16–8/31/17 

POLAND: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A–455–803 ................................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA: 

Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, A–580–881 .............................................................................................................. 3/7/16–8/31/17 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Pipes and Tubes, A–580–880 ............................................................... 3/1/16–8/31/17 

Oil Country Tubular Goods, A–580–870 ...................................................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod, A–580–829 ......................................................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Oil Country Tubular Goods, A–552–817 ............................................................. 9/1/16–8/31/17 

TAIWAN: 

Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge, A–583–844 ....................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Raw Flexible Magnets, A–583–842 ............................................................................................................................. 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod, A–583–828 ......................................................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: 

Freshwater Crawfish Tailmeat, A–570–848 ................................................................................................................. 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Foundry Coke, A–570–862 .......................................................................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks, A–570–941 ................................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Lined Paper Products, A–570–901 .............................................................................................................................. 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Magnesia Carbon Bricks, A–570–954 .......................................................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge, A–570–952 ....................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires, A–570–912 ....................................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Raw Flexible Magnets, A–570–922 ............................................................................................................................. 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A–570–860 ............................................................................................................. 9/1/16–8/31/17 

TURKEY: 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes, A–489–824 ...................................................... 3/1/16–8/27/16 

9/12/16–8/31/17 

Oil Country Tubular Goods, A–489–816 ...................................................................................................................... 9/1/16–8/31/17 

UKRAINE: 

Solid Agricultural Grade Ammonium Nitrate, A–823–810 ............................................................................................ 9/1/16–8/31/17 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A–823–809 ............................................................................................................. 9/1/16–8/31/17 

UNITED KINGDOM: Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, A–412–824 .................................................................................... 3/7/16–8/31/17 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

BRAZIL: Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, C–351–843 ....................................................................................................... 12/22/15–12/31/16 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices 41597 

2See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web 

site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. 

3See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

4 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties 

should specify that they are requesting a review of 

entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to 

the extent possible, include the names of such 

exporters in their request. 

5See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

Period of review 

INDIA: 

Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, C–533–866 .............................................................................................................. 9/16/16–12/31/16 

Lined Paper Products, C–533–844 .............................................................................................................................. 1/1/16–12/31/16 

Oil Country Tubular Goods, C–533–858 ...................................................................................................................... 1/1/16–12/31/16 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, C–580–882 ............................................................................. 7/1/16–12/31/16 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: 

Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks, C–570–942 ................................................................................................... 1/1/16–12/31/16 

Magnesia Carbon Bricks, C–570–955 ......................................................................................................................... 1/1/16–12/31/16 

Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge, C–570–953 ...................................................................................... 1/1/16–12/31/16 

New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires, C–570–913 ....................................................................................................... 1/1/16–12/31/16 

Raw Flexible Magnets, C–570–923 ............................................................................................................................. 1/1/16–12/31/16 

TURKEY: 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes, C–489–825 ...................................................... 12/28/15–4/25/16 

9/12/16–12/31/16 

Oil Country Tubular Goods, C–489–817 ...................................................................................................................... 1/1/16–12/31/16 

Suspension Agreements 

None.

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), an interested party as 

defined by section 771(9) of the Act may 

request in writing that the Secretary 

conduct an administrative review. For 

both antidumping and countervailing 

duty reviews, the interested party must 

specify the individual producers or 

exporters covered by an antidumping 

finding or an antidumping or 

countervailing duty order or suspension 

agreement for which it is requesting a 

review. In addition, a domestic 

interested party or an interested party 

described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act 

must state why it desires the Secretary 

to review those particular producers or 

exporters. If the interested party intends 

for the Secretary to review sales of 

merchandise by an exporter (or a 

producer if that producer also exports 

merchandise from other suppliers) 

which was produced in more than one 

country of origin and each country of 

origin is subject to a separate order, then 

the interested party must state 

specifically, on an order-by-order basis, 

which exporter(s) the request is 

intended to cover. 

Note that, for any party the 

Department was unable to locate in 

prior segments, the Department will not 

accept a request for an administrative 

review of that party absent new 

information as to the party’s location. 

Moreover, if the interested party who 

files a request for review is unable to 

locate the producer or exporter for 

which it requested the review, the 

interested party must provide an 

explanation of the attempts it made to 

locate the producer or exporter at the 

same time it files its request for review, 

in order for the Secretary to determine 

if the interested party’s attempts were 

reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii). 

As explained in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011), the Department 

clarified its practice with respect to the 

collection of final antidumping duties 

on imports of merchandise where 

intermediate firms are involved. The 

public should be aware of this 

clarification in determining whether to 

request an administrative review of 

merchandise subject to antidumping 

findings and orders.2

The Department no longer considers 

the non-market economy (NME) entity 

as an exporter conditionally subject to 

an antidumping duty administrative 

reviews.3 Accordingly, the NME entity 

will not be under review unless the 

Department specifically receives a 

request for, or self-initiates, a review of 

the NME entity.4 In administrative 

reviews of antidumping duty orders on 

merchandise from NME countries where 

a review of the NME entity has not been 

initiated, but where an individual 

exporter for which a review was 

initiated does not qualify for a separate 

rate, the Department will issue a final 

decision indicating that the company in 

question is part of the NME entity. 

However, in that situation, because no 

review of the NME entity was 

conducted, the NME entity’s entries 

were not subject to the review and the 

rate for the NME entity is not subject to 

change as a result of that review 

(although the rate for the individual 

exporter may change as a function of the 

finding that the exporter is part of the 

NME entity). 

Following initiation of an 

antidumping administrative review 

when there is no review requested of the 

NME entity, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all 

exporters not named in the initiation 

notice, including those that were 

suspended at the NME entity rate. 

All requests must be filed 

electronically in Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS) on 

Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS 

Web site at http://access.trade.gov.5

Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request 

must be served on the petitioner and 

each exporter or producer specified in 

the request. 

The Department will publish in the 

Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation 

of Administrative Review of 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation’’ for requests received by 

the last day of September 2017. If the 

Department does not receive, by the last 

day of September 2017, a request for 

review of entries covered by an order, 

finding, or suspended investigation 

listed in this notice and for the period 

identified above, the Department will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping or 

countervailing duties on those entries at 

a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
41598 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices 

1See Final Determination or Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Foundry Coke Products from the 

People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 39487 (July 31, 

2001) (LTFV Investigation Final). 

2See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Foundry Coke Products from The 

People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 48025, 

(September 17, 2001) (AD Order). 

3See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 82 

FR 20314 (May 1, 2017). 

4See Petitioners’ May 10, 2017, submission. 

5See Petitioners’ submission ‘‘Re: Foundry Coke 

from China, Third Sunset Review: Substantive 

Response to Notice of Initiation of Sunset Review’’ 

(May 31, 2017). 

6See Foundry Coke Products from the People’s 

Republic of China, 77 Federal Register 34,012 (June 

8, 2012). 

7See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the 

non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from 

James Maeder, Senior Director performing the 

duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

‘‘Expedited Third Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Foundry Coke 

Products from the People’s Republic of China: 

Issues and Decision Memorandum,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

bond for) estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: August 22, 2017. 

James Maeder, 

Senior Director perfoming the duties of 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18585 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–862] 

Foundry Coke Products From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the Expedited Third Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset 

review, the Department of Commerce 

(the Department) finds that revocation 

of the antidumping duty order on 

foundry coke products (foundry coke) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC) would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

DATES: Applicable September 1, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Courtney Canales, AD/CVD Operations, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; Telephone: (202) 482–4997. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 31, 2001, the Department 

published its final determination in the 

less-than-fair value investigation of 

foundry coke from the PRC.1 On 

September 17, 2001, the Department 

published an amended final 

determination of sales at less-than-fairvalue and the AD Order on foundry coke 

from the PRC.2 On May 1, 2017, the 

Department published the notice of 

initiation of the third sunset review of 

the AD Order, pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(Act).3 On May 10, 2017, the 

Department received a notice of intent 

to participate from: ABC Coke, Erie 

Coke, and Tonawanda Coke 

(collectively, the petitioners) within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i).4 ABC Coke, Erie Coke, 

and Tonawanda Coke claimed 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act, as producers in the 

United States of a domestic like 

product. On May 31, 2017, the 

Department received a complete and 

adequate substantive response from the 

the petitioners within the 30-day 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).5 The Department 

received no substantive responses from 

respondent interested parties. As a 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department 

conducted an expedited sunset review 

of the AD Order. 

Scope of the AD Order 

The product covered under the 

antidumping duty order is coke larger 

than 100 mm (4 inches) in maximum 

diameter and at least 50 percent of 

which is retained on a 100 mm (4 inch) 

sieve, of a kind used in foundries. The 

foundry coke products subject to the 

antidumping duty order were 

classifiable under subheading 

2704.00.00.10 (as of Jan 1, 2000) and are 

currently classifiable under subheading 

2704.00.00.11 (as of July 1, 2000) of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and Customs purposes, our 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review, including 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of dumping in the event of 

revocation of the AD Order and the 

magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail if the order were revoked, is 

provided in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, which is hereby adopted 

by this notice.7 The appendix to this 

notice includes a list of the issues which 

the parties raised and to which the 

Department responded in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Services System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and to all parties in the 

Central Records Unit, room B0824 of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed on the 

Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the 

Department determines that revocation 

of the AD Order would be likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping, and that the magnitude of the 

dumping margins likely to prevail 

would be weighted-average dumping 

margins up to 214.89 percent. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES