alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15224 and #15225; California Disaster Number CA-00275]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of CALIFORNIA dated 08/11/2017.

# DATES:

Issued on 08/11/2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/29/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/01/2018.                    

      ( print page 40213)    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an Administrative declaration for the State of CALIFORNIA, dated 07/31/2017, is hereby amended to establish the incident closing date as 08/01/2017.

*Incident:*                     Detwiler Fire.                

*Incident Period:*                     07/16/2017 through 08/01/2017.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Linda E. McMahon,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2017-17915 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
For release 10:00 a.m. (ET) Wednesday, March 6, 2024 USDL-24-0452 

Technical information: (202) 691-6567 • QCEWInfo@bls.gov • www.bls.gov/cew 

Media contact: (202) 691-5902 • PressOffice@bls.gov 

COUNTY EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES FULL DATA UPDATE

THIRD QUARTER 2023 

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) updated the full Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages 

(QCEW) database through the third quarter of 2023. Links to updated databases, files, and tables can be 

found at www.bls.gov/web/cewdat.supp.toc.htm. Interactive chart data have been updated with 

additional detail provided at www.bls.gov/charts/county-employment-and-wages/county-employmentby-industry.htm. 

This update includes data previously issued with the County Employment and Wages news release for 

the third quarter of 2023. 

____________ 

The County Employment and Wages release for fourth quarter 2023 is scheduled to be released 

on Wednesday, May 22, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. (ET). 

The County Employment and Wages full data update for fourth quarter 2023 is scheduled to be 

released on Wednesday, June 5, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. (ET).
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

ON REMAND

NO. 03-11-00669-CV

Tom Bennett and James B. Bonham Corp., Appellants

v.

Larry Wayne Grant, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN SABA COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 8086, HONORABLE GUILFORD L. JONES III, JUDGE PRESIDING

S U P P L E M E N T A L M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On August 24, 2018, we issued a memorandum opinion assessing the appropriate

amount of exemplary damages to award Larry Wayne Grant against defendants, Tom Bennett

and James B. Bonham Corp., as directed by the Texas Supreme Court. See Bennett v. Grant,

1

525 S.W.3d 642, 653 (Tex. 2017). Upon considering the Texas Supreme Court’s guidance and

directive on remand, we affirmed the trial court’s judgment conditioned on the filing of a remittitur

The trial court awarded Grant actual and exemplary damages against Bennett and Bonham

1

for malicious prosecution. This Court had previously affirmed the trial court’sjudgment, asreformed

by remittur, reducing the amount of exemplary damages awarded from $1,000,000 per defendant to

$512,109 per defendant. See Bennett v. Grant, 460 S.W.3d 220, 258 (Tex. App.—Austin 2015),

rev’d &remanded in part by 525 S.W.3d 642 (Tex. 2017). The Texas Supreme Court later affirmed

this Court’s decision, except for reversing the exemplary-damages portion of our judgment and

remanding for a revised remittitur. Bennett v. Grant, 525 S.W.3d 642, 653 (Tex. 2017).
reducing the award of exemplary damages as to Bennett by an additional $480,000 and the award

of exemplary damages as to Bonham by an additional $480,000 (reducing the exemplary-damages

award against each from $512,109 to $32,109).

In response to our opinion, Grant filed with the trial court a remittitur reducing the

amount of his exemplary-damages award against each defendant by an additional $480,000. See

Tex. R. App. 46.3. In accordance with our prior opinion, we reform the trial court’s judgment to

award Larry Wayne Grant $32,109 in exemplary damages against James B. Bonham Corp. and

$32,109 in exemplary damages against Tom Bennett. As reformed, we affirm the trial court’s

judgment on that claim and in all other respects.

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

 Justice Pemberton not participating

Reformed and, as Reformed, Affirmed

Filed: October 9, 2018

2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


         The undersigned officer of DATATRAK International, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
            June 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements
            of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
            amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form
            10-Q.

Dated: August 13, 2003                            /s/ Terry C. Black
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Terry C. Black
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Black Cactus Global, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeremy Towning, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: June 29, 2020/s/ Jeremy Towning
Jeremy Towning
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
exh104.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing





Exhibit 10.4

Addendum to the Purchase and Sale Agreement Dated September 26, 2008 between Valcent USA, 

Inc. (the “Purchaser”), Global Green Solutions Inc. (the “Seller”), and Vertigro Algae 

Technologies LLC (the “Company”), (collectively the “Parties”) (the “Agreement”)

The Parties hereby agree to amend item 2. (b) of the Agreement such that the closing of the Purchase (the “Closing”) shall take place at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time on the first business day that is 180 days from the date of the Agreement, or on such date and time as the Parties may otherwise mutually agree (the “Closing Date”).

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in effect and unchanged.

This Addendum may be executed in separate counterparts each of which will be an original and all of which taken together will constitute one and the same Addendum.

In WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Addendum to the Agreement as of December 5, 2008.

Purchaser:

Valcent USA, Inc.

By: GERRY JARDINE

Name: Gerry Jardine

Title: Director

 

Seller:



Global Green Solutions Inc.

By: ELDEN SCHORN

Name: Elden Schorn

Title: Chairman of the Board

 

Company:



Vertigro Algae Technologies, LLC

By: F. GEORGE ORR

Name: F. George Orr

Title: Director



By: M. ELDEN SCHORN

Name: Elden Schorn

Title: Director
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSEPH ALBERT DURANT,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-11-00169-CR

Appeal from the

297th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC#1181547D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
Exhibit 32.1


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of Zunicom, Inc. and Subsidiary (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),I,  William Tan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350,
as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;
                     and

                (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     results of operations of the Company,


/s/ William Tan
--------------------
William Tan
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)

May 20, 2007



























                                Exhibit 32.1 - 1
#### Josephine T. Rossi, Appellant, v Budget Rent A Car/Budget Car and Truck Rental, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[853 NYS2d 728]

Rose, J.

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action in January 2001 seeking damages for the personal injuries she allegedly sustained in a 1997 motor vehicle accident. Defendant Budget Rent A Car/Budget Car and Truck Rental (hereinafter defendant) answered and served discovery demands. Plaintiff did not respond to those demands or to defendant’s four follow-up letters requesting disclosure. In 2005, defendant filed a request for judicial intervention and, at its request, Supreme Court directed plaintiff to respond to the original discovery demands by January 31, 2006. Although the court granted plaintiff an extension of time, plaintiff only partially responded. By an order issued on May 11, 2006, Supreme Court directed plaintiff to fully respond to all demands by May 31, 2006. Although plaintiff served some responses by that deadline, they were again incomplete and defendant moved to strike the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126. Finding that plaintiff had willfully disregarded its prior orders and deliberately failed to disclose, among other things, her medical records, Supreme Court granted defendant’s motion. Plaintiff appeals.

Where, as here, a party has placed his or her medical condition in issue, the physician/patient privilege and other privacy *1089protections are deemed waived *(see*CPLR 3121 [a]; *Appler v Riverview Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.,*9 AD3d 577, 579 [2004]; *Coddington v Lisk,*249 AD2d 817, 818 [1998]), and this waiver extends to the furnishing of medical authorizations that comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 *(see Poser v Varnovitsky,*46 AD3d 1295, 1296 [2007]). In a well-reasoned decision, Supreme Court found that plaintiff failed to provide authorizations and allow access to her medical records which the court had ordered to be produced by reasonable deadlines. Since the record is clear that plaintiff repeatedly disobeyed court orders, evaded her disclosure obligations and frustrated the disclosure process, Supreme Court acted within its discretion in dismissing her claim *(see*CPLR 3126 [3]; *Kihl v Pfeffer,*94 NY2d 118, 123 [1999]; *Du Valle v Swan Lake Resort Hotel, LLC,*26 AD3d 616, 618 [2006]; *Appler v Riverview Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.,*9 AD3d at 578).

We have examined plaintiffs remaining contentions, including her claim that Supreme Court should have granted her a protective order guarding the confidentiality of her medical records, and find them to be either unpreserved or lacking in merit.

Peters, J.P., Carpinello, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit (10)(p)
 Amendment
 Defined Benefit  Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(Amended and Restated as of December 1, 2007)
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Now Therefore,
 Separation from
Service
    
    Means the Employee retires or otherwise has a separation from service
from the company as defined under Code Section 409A and any applicable
regulations. The Plan Administrator will determine, consistent with
the requirements of Code Section 409A and any applicable regulations,
to what extent a person on a leave of absence, including on paid sick
leave pursuant to Company policy, has incurred a Separation from
Service. Notwithstanding the above, a Separation from Service will
occur consistent with the requirements of Code Section 409A when it is
reasonably anticipated that the future level of bona fide services
provided by the Employee (whether as an employee or as an independent
contractor) will be no more than 45% of the average level of bona fide
services performed by the Employee (whether as an employee or as an
independent contractor) over the immediately preceding 36 month period
(or the full period of services, if less than 36 months).
 1




---



##### 



Signed this 21 day of December, 2008.CMS Energy Corporation:/s/ John M. Butler

John M. ButlerSenior Vice President  Human Resources and Administrative ServicesAttest:/s/ Catherine M. Reynolds

Catherine M. ReynoldsVice President and Secretary
 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Stephen L. Mueller, Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/  Stephen L. Mueller
--------------------------------------
Stephen L. Mueller
Vice President, Finance and Administration
Secretary & Treasurer

November 4, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Encysive
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
----

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Mel G. Riggs                                        |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Mel G. Riggs                                            |
| President and Chief Executive Officer                   |
| of Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                       |
| Managing General Partner of                             |
| Southwest Royalties Institutional Income Fund X-C, L.P. |
|                                                    |
| May 13, 2011                                            |
|                                                    |
|                                                    |
| /s/ Michael L. Pollard                                  |
| Michael L. Pollard                                      |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer       |
| Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                          |
| Managing General Partner of                             |
| Southwest Royalties Institutional Income Fund X-C, L.P. |
|                                                    |
| May 13, 2011                                            |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF AUGUST 31, 1998 AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED AUGUST
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FILING.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,473,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,121,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,104,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   650,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,940,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,411,000
<PP&E>                                      15,353,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,047,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,102,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,948,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,115,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,102,000
<SALES>                                     13,540,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,283,000
<CGS>                                       12,083,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,910,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,296,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,372,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,281,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,091,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,091,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-21086 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN CARLOS GUERRERO-SUAREZ, also known as Leonel Jiminez Alvarez, also known as Juan Guerrero, also known as Juan C. Guerrero, also known as Juan Carlos Guerrero, also known as Juan Martinez Guerrero, also known as Juan Soto, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-402-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 22, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Juan Carlos Guerrero-Suarez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry by a previously deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). Guerrero-Suarez argues that the indictment was insufficient because it failed to allege any specific-intent element. He concedes, however, that this argument is foreclosed by United States v. Ortegon-Uvalde , 179No. 99-21086 -2- F.3d 956, 959 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 979 (1999), and United States v. Trevino-Martinez , 86 F.3d 65, 68 (5th Cir. 1996). He raises the issue only to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review. Next, Guerrero-Suarez avers that his indictment was defective for charging him with a prohibited status offense. This argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Tovias-Marroquin , 218 F.3d 455, 456-57 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 670 (2000). Finally, Guerrero-Suarez contends that the indictment was insufficient because it failed to allege any mens rea . This court’s recent decision in United States v. Berrios-Centeno , 250 F.3d 294, 298-300 (5th Cir. 2001), is dispositive. The instant indictment fairly conveyed that Guerrero-Suarez’s presence was a voluntary act from the allegations that he was deported, removed, and subsequently present without consent of the Attorney General. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED.