alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           712,342
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           53,353
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             53,113
<EQUITIES>                                      37,626
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 852,799
<CASH>                                          12,125
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          20,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,242,724
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                620,078
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            127,209
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            9,109
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 88,861
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,447
<OTHER-SE>                                     313,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,242,724
<PREMIUMS>                                     452,856
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             51,154
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              10,807
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  41,554
<BENEFITS>                                     314,700
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     84,093
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            53,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,117
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,517
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 463,123
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            318,509
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (3,809)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             131,061
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               185,764
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                526,427
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        (3,809)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1

                     INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
DATATRAK International, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
DATATRAK International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of March 31,
2000, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash
flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 1999 and 2000. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical review
procedures to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an
audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which
will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of DATATRAK International, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, not
presented herein, and in our report dated February 25, 2000, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion,
the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
April 20, 2000
EX-10.25





Exhibit 10.25


COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.

First Amendment to the 2008 Bonus Plan




Dated: November 5, 2008




     WHEREAS, on March 5, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc. (the “Company”), adopted the Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. 2008 Bonus
Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company now wishes to amend the Plan to comply with the requirements of Section
409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the treasury regulations and other
official guidance promulgated thereunder.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Plan is hereby amended to add a new
section thereto to read as follows:




“Time of Payment

Any bonus payable pursuant to this 2008 Bonus Plan shall be paid by the Company during the
2009 calendar year.”


Except as specifically modified herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in
accordance with all of the terms and conditions thereof.




[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]





F-1









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this first amendment to the Plan as of
the date first written above.



COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.




	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Chad M. Utrup
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Chad M. Utrup
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	CFO
	 

	 	 	 	 






2
exv10w12






Exhibit 10.12




FORM OF




AMENDMENT TO INDEMNIFICATION ASSURANCE AGREEMENT




     This Amendment to Indemnification Assurance Agreement (this “Agreement”), is entered into
between Furmanite Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and __________________
(the “Indemnitee”) effective as of January 1, 2009.



WITNESSETH:




     Whereas, the Company and the Indemnitee previously entered into an Indemnification
Assurance Agreement dated
_______________
(the “Indemnification Agreement”); and



     Whereas, the Company and the Indemnitee desire to amend the Indemnification Agreement
to bring the Indemnification Agreement into documentary compliance with section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and the rules and regulations issued thereunder by the
Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Treasury.



     Now, therefore, it is hereby agreed that effective as of January 1, 2009, the Indemnification
Agreement is amended by adding thereto the following new provisions:



     Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that any payment
hereunder is not exempt from section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”) pursuant to the application of Department of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(10) or
other applicable exemption (a “409A Payment”) the following provisions of this paragraph shall
apply with respect to such 409A Payment. The Company shall make a 409A Payment to you within ten
(10) business days after the delivery of your written request for the payment accompanied by such
evidence of fees and expenses incurred as the Company may reasonably require. The parties intend
and agree that such payment deadline is not to be extended as a result of the following sentence
which is included solely for the purpose of complying with Section 409A. The Company shall pay you
such 409A Payment by the last day of your taxable year following the taxable year in which you
incurred such legal fees and expenses. The legal fees or expenses that are subject to reimbursement
pursuant to this paragraph shall not be limited as a result of when the fees or expenses are
incurred. The amount of legal fees or expenses that is eligible for reimbursement pursuant to this
paragraph during a given taxable year of you shall not affect the amount of expenses eligible for
reimbursement in any other taxable year of you. The right to reimbursement pursuant to this
paragraph is not subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Indemnitee has hereunto set the Indemnitee’s hand and, pursuant to the
authorization from its Board of Directors, the Company has caused these presents to be executed in
its name on its behalf, all as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	FURMANITE CORPORATION 	 	 
	 	  	
 	 



	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	By:  	 	      
    
Date: 

	 	Title:  	 	 
	 	Date:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) / Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   May 10, 2006
 /s/ Bruce D. Given, M.D.Bruce D. Given, M.D.President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40745-40746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18310]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

DATE AND TIME:  Wednesday, August 30, 2017, 2:15 p.m. EDT

PLACE:  Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave. SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT:  Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (Board) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. The Board will vote on a consent 
agenda consisting of the minutes of its June 14, 2017 meeting. The 
Board will receive a report from the Chief Executive Officer and 
Director of BBG.
    This meeting will be available for public observation via streamed 
webcast, both live and on-demand, on the agency's public Web site at 
www.bbg.gov. Information regarding this meeting, including any updates 
or adjustments to its starting time, can also be found on the agency's 
public Web site.
    The public may also attend this meeting in person at the address 
listed

[[Page 40746]]

above as seating capacity permits. Members of the public seeking to 
attend the meeting in person must register at https://bbgboardmeetingaugust2017.eventbrite.com by 12:00 p.m. (EDT) on August 
29. For more information, please contact BBG Public Affairs at (202) 
203-4400 or by email at [email protected].

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Oanh Tran at (202) 203-4545.

Oanh Tran,
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2017-18310 Filed 8-24-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 23 (A)


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-64451 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statements Nos. 33-61087, 333-5921,
333-18041, and 333-61993 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 26, 1999 (which
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern) appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of OXIS International, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1998.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Portland, Oregon

April 29, 1999
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 757 

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of certain 

rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial names. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2015 

Mr. NELSON (for himself and Mr. BURR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States 

courts of certain rights relating to certain marks, trade 

names, or commercial names. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Stolen Trademarks 

5 Honored in America Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION. 

7 Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Re8 lated Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in 

9 section 101(b) of division A of Public Law 105–277; 112 

10 Stat. 2681–88) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 757 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a)(2)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘by a designated national’’; 

3 and 

4 (B) by inserting before the period ‘‘that 

5 was used in connection with a business or as6 sets that were confiscated unless the original 

7 owner of the mark, trade name, or commercial 

8 name, or the bonafide successor-in-interest has 

9 expressly consented’’; 

10 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘by a des11 ignated national or its successor-in-interest’’; 

12 (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub13 section (e); 

14 (4) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol15 lowing: 

16 ‘‘(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall 

17 apply only if the person or entity asserting the rights knew 

18 or had reason to know at the time when the person or 

19 entity acquired the rights asserted that the mark, trade 

20 name, or commercial name was the same as or substan21 tially similar to a mark, trade name, or commercial name 

22 that was used in connection with a business or assets that 

23 were confiscated.’’; and 

24 (5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by 

25 striking ‘‘In this section:’’ and all that follows 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 757 IS

1 through ‘‘(2) The term’’ and inserting ‘‘In this sec2 tion, the term’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Robert HERNANDEZ, Claimant-Appellee, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 2006-7007.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 11, 2008.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs responds to the court’s November 20, 2007 order and requests that the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) in *Hernandez v.*
      *274
      *Nicholson,*03-737 be summarily affirmed. Robert Hernandez has not responded.

The Secretary appealed from the CAVC’s decision, challenging the court’s placement of the burden on the Secretary of establishing that a 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) notification error was not prejudicial. In *Sanders v. Nicholson,*487 F.3d 881 (Fed. Cir.2007) this court held that any section 5103(a) error should be presumed prejudicial and the Secretary has the burden of rebutting this presumption. *Id.*at 891. Under these circumstances, summary affirmance is appropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The judgment of the CAVC is summarily affirmed. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2023_3_20_12_51" style="width: 618px;"><caption><span class="tableTitle">Chart 2. Likelihood of having children in the household who attended only in-person, only remote, or hybrid schooling last week, by race, ethnicity, and survey</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="1" scope="col">Survey</th>
<th scope="col">Black, non-Hispanic</th>
<th scope="col">Hispanic</th>
<th scope="col">Non-black, non-Hispanic</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>NLSY97, only in-person schooling <a href="#BLStable_2023_3_20_12_51_footnotes"><sup>[1]</sup></a></p>
</th>
<td>17.7</td>
<td>19.2</td>
<td>36.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>NLSY97, only remote schooling <a href="#BLStable_2023_3_20_12_51_footnotes"><sup>[1]</sup></a></p>
</th>
<td>47.2</td>
<td>45.3</td>
<td>23.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>NLSY97, hybrid schooling <a href="#BLStable_2023_3_20_12_51_footnotes"><sup>[1]</sup></a></p>
</th>
<td>29.2</td>
<td>31.0</td>
<td>38.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>HPS, only in-person schooling <a href="#BLStable_2023_3_20_12_51_footnotes"><sup>[2]</sup></a></p>
</th>
<td>14.3</td>
<td>19.3</td>
<td>42.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>HPS, only remote schooling <a href="#BLStable_2023_3_20_12_51_footnotes"><sup>[2]</sup></a></p>
</th>
<td>28.6</td>
<td>30.2</td>
<td>16.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>HPS, hybrid schooling <a href="#BLStable_2023_3_20_12_51_footnotes"><sup>[2]</sup></a></p>
</th>
<td>55.9</td>
<td>49.3</td>
<td>40.5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2023_3_20_12_51_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="4">
<p><a href="#BLStable_2023_3_20_12_51"><sup>[1]</sup></a> NLSY97 is the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997.</p>
<p><a href="#BLStable_2023_3_20_12_51"><sup>[2]</sup></a> HPS is the Household Pulse Survey.</p>
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 and U.S. Census Bureau, Household Pulse Survey.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p></p>
EXHIBIT 31.1 

 

I, Gary D. Blackford, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Universal Hospital Services, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; ****

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 8, 2003
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 27, 2016

d0919 

# Order

Clerk September 27, 2016

149647

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149647

COA: 315236

St. Joseph CC: 12

- 017655

- FH

ERIK PAUL GUTIERREZ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of November 25, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the May 22,

2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance p ending the decision in

People v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been

decided on July 29, 2015, 498 Mich 358 (2015), the application is again considered.

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appea l, we REVERSE in part

the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the St. Joseph

Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different

sentence under the sentencing procedure described in Lockridge . On remand, the trial

court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court

determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional

constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sent ence. If, however, the trial

court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the

unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are n ot persuaded that the remaining

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.