alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Adrienne GILLIG and Philip Gillig, Plaintiffs, v. BYMART-TINTAIR, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 29, 1954.

*394David B. Williams, New York City, for plaintiffs.

John W. Trapp, New York City, for defendant.

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion of the plaintiffs, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for an order requiring the defendant to produce and permit plaintiffs to inspect and copy:

(1) A medical report of a physician for defendant’s insurance carrier relating to the examination of the plaintiff Adrienne Gillig made on, or about February 11, 1953, after the accident in controversy but before the commencement of the action.

(2) Books, records, and documents relating to prior claims, complaints, or suits brought by others against defendant arising out of the use by others of defendant’s product.

Defendant makes a cross motion, pursuant to Rule 30(b), to limit any deposition taken by the plaintiff on oral testimony so as not to permit the plaintiff to inquire into the foregoing items.

The action is one for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered by plaintiff (and for loss of services, consortium and medical expenses of the husband) growing out of the use of hair dye which the complaint alleges contained harmful material rendering it dangerous in character.

The plaintiff, before suit was instituted, and before her present attorney was retained, was examined by a physician at defendant’s request, or at the request of defendant’s insurance carrier. The plaintiff is clearly entitled to a copy of the report made by this physician. Dumas v. Pennsylvania R. Co., D.C.N.D.Ohio 1951, 11 F.R.D. 496; Moore’s Federal Practice, Sec. 35.06.

Plaintiff urges that it should be granted an inspection of records relating to prior claims and suits of a similar nature, since these documents may disclose facts from which it would be possible to prove that the defendant had reason to know that its product was dangerous. Defendant contends that the reports would not be relevant or competent in plaintiff’s cause of action. Defendant may be right that the documents might not be competent or relevant evidence in and of themselves, but they might contain statements of fact which would be the source of other material which would be admissible at the trial. See Hickman v. Taylor, 3 Cir., 1945, 153 F.2d 212, and cases cited therein at page 219. Privileged communications between defendant and its counsel are, of course, not the type of documents which need be produced. The other documents, *395however, are a proper subject for Inspection and copying.

Plaintiff’s motion to require the defendant to permit the inspection and copying of the documents set forth in its motion is granted. Defendant’s motion to limit the examination is denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Brendan McGovern, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jonathan Lamm, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 28, 2019



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Brendan McGovern                                                  
|Brendan McGovern Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: February 28, 2019



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jonathan Lamm                                                                
|Jonathan Lamm Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
No. 07

- 15

- 00395

- CR

Robert Spaeth Appellant

v.

The State of Texas Appellee §

§

§

§ From the County Court at Law No

. 1 of Potter County

October 18, 2017

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated October 18, 2017

, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgme nt of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis , no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the use of our report dated May 11, 2017 with respect to the restated consolidated financial statements of Repsol Oil & Gas Canada Inc., which comprise the restated consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the restated consolidated statements of loss, comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, included in an exhibit to the Annual Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 
| *(signed)   “Ernst & Young LLP”* |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                |   |
| Calgary, Canada                                     |   |
| May 11, 2017                                   |   |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 817 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.817

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                                 An Act

 
To provide for the addition of certain real property to the reservation 
               of the Siletz Tribe in the State of Oregon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PURPOSE; CLARIFICATION.
    (a) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to facilitate fee-to-trust 
applications for the Siletz Tribe within the geographic area specified 
in the amendment made by this Act.
    (b) Clarification.--Except as specifically provided otherwise by 
this Act or the amendment made by this Act, nothing in this Act or the 
amendment made by this Act, shall prioritize for any purpose the claims 
of any federally recognized Indian tribe over the claims of any other 
federally recognized Indian tribe.
SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY OF THE SILETZ TRIBE OF THE STATE 
OF OREGON.
    Section 7 of the Siletz Tribe Indian Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 
711e) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Treatment of Certain Property.--
        ``(1) In general.--
            ``(A) Title.--The Secretary may accept title to any 
        additional number of acres of real property located within the 
        boundaries of the original 1855 Siletz Coast Reservation 
        established by Executive order dated November 9, 1855, 
        comprised of land within the political boundaries of Benton, 
        Douglas, Lane, Lincoln, Tillamook, and Yamhill Counties in the 
        State of Oregon, if that real property is conveyed or otherwise 
        transferred to the United States by or on behalf of the tribe.
            ``(B) Trust.--Land to which title is accepted by the 
        Secretary under this paragraph shall be held in trust by the 
        United States for the benefit of the tribe.
        ``(2) Treatment as part of reservation.--All real property that 
    is taken into trust under paragraph (1) shall--
            ``(A) be considered and evaluated as an on-reservation 
        acquisition under part 151.10 of title 25, Code of Federal 
        Regulations (or successor regulations); and
            ``(B) become part of the reservation of the tribe.
        ``(3) Prohibition on gaming.--Any real property taken into 
    trust under paragraph (1) shall not be eligible, or used, for any 
    gaming activity carried out under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 
    (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2022

- 3417

_____________________________
R ANDALL P ETERSEN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Coleman Lee Robinson , Judge

.

(Date)

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
K ELSEY , W INOKUR , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Randall Petersen
, pro se, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael L. Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
### Bureau of Labor Statistics U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Legal Occupations Workers in this group interpret the law and support law-related activities. Overall employment in legal occupations is projected to grow faster than the average for all occupations from 2022 to 2032. About 91,700 openings are projected each year, on average, in these occupations due to employment growth and the need to replace workers who leave the occupations permanently. The median annual wage for this group was $99,220 in May 2023, which was higher than the median annual wage for all occupations of $48,060. BLS employment projections, wage, and other data for related occupations not shown in the following table are available on the Data for Occupations Not Covered in Detail page. Information highlighting physical demands, cognitive and mental requirements, and other qualifications for workers in this group are available in a BLS Occupational Requirements Survey (ORS) profile. **Occupation**
                **Job Summary**
                **Entry-Level Education**
                **2022     MEDIAN PAY****Arbitrators, Mediators, and Conciliators**
            Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators facilitate negotiation and dialogue between disputing parties to help resolve conflicts outside of the court system.
            Bachelor's degree
            $71,540**Court Reporters and Simultaneous Captioners**
            Court reporters create word-for-word transcriptions at trials, depositions, and other legal proceedings. Simultaneous captioners provide similar transcriptions for television or for presentations in other settings, such as press conferences and business meetings, for people who are deaf or hard of hearing.
            Postsecondary nondegree award
            $63,940**Judges and Hearing Officers**
            Judges and hearing officers oversee legal matters in court or administrative proceedings.
            Doctoral or professional degree
            $132,950**Lawyers**
            Lawyers advise and represent clients on legal proceedings or transactions.
            Doctoral or professional degree
            $145,760**Paralegals and Legal Assistants**
            Paralegals and legal assistants support lawyers by performing a variety of tasks, such as maintaining and organizing files, conducting legal research, and drafting documents.
            Associate's degree
            $60,970 **Last Modified Date:**
                        Wednesday, April 17, 2024


**U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics**
Office of Occupational Statistics and Employment Projections 
PSB Suite 2135 
2 Massachusetts Avenue NE  
Washington, DC 20212-0001 Telephone:1-202-691-5700 

www.bls.gov/ooh
Contact OOH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0660 IN THE MATTER OF: R.V., A Youth
. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 4 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 24 2024

09/24/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0660
EXHIBIT 21  NATIONAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, INC.  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

NTS, TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, A CALIFORNIA CORP.
(FORMERLY NATIONAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, A CALIFORNIA CORP.)

ACTON
ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING CORPORATION, A MASSACHUSETTS CORP.

APPROVED
ENGINEERING TESTING LABORATORIES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP.

ETCR INC.,
A CALIFORNIA CORP.

XXCAL, INC.,
A CALIFORNIA CORP.

XXCAL
LIMITED, A UK CORP.

NATIONAL
QUALITY ASSURANCE, INC., A MASSACHUSETTS CORP. (50% OWNED)
(FORMERLY NATIONAL QUALITY ASSURNACEUSA, INC., A MASSACHUSETTS CORP.)

51

---

QuickLinks
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 836 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal certain limitations 

on health care benefits enacted by the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2015 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. BURR, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

certain limitations on health care benefits enacted by 

the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Health Care 

5 Flexibility Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 836 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISTRIBUTIONS FOR MEDICINE QUALI2 FIED ONLY IF FOR PRESCRIBED DRUG OR IN3 SULIN. 

4 (a) HSAS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 223(d)(2) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik6 ing the last sentence. 

7 (b) ARCHER MSAS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

8 220(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend9 ed by striking the last sentence. 

10 (c) HEALTH FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS

11 AND HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS.—Sec12 tion 106 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

13 by striking subsection (f). 

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

15 (1) DISTRIBUTIONS FROM SAVINGS AC16 COUNTS.—The amendments made by subsections (a) 

17 and (b) shall apply to amounts paid with respect to 

18 taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015. 

19 (2) REIMBURSEMENTS.—The amendment made 

20 by subsection (c) shall apply to expenses incurred 

21 with respect to taxable years beginning after Decem22 ber 31, 2015. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 836 IS

1 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON HEALTH FLEXIBLE 

2 SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS UNDER CAFE3 TERIA PLANS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 125 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 

6 (1) by striking subsection (i), and 

7 (2) by redesignating subsections (j), (k), and (l) 

8 as subsections (i), (j), and (k), respectively. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2015. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2024_2_23_7_43" style="width: 95%;"><caption><span class="tableTitle">Chart 2d. Seasonal adjustment for Employment Cost Index (ECI) wages and salaries and Current Employment Statistics (CES) average hourly earnings, private industry workers, December, 2014–23</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; min-width: 80px;" rowspan="1" scope="col">Year</th>
<th scope="col">ECI seasonal adjustment</th>
<th scope="col">CES seasonal adjustment</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2014</p>
</th>
<td>0.11</td>
<td>0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2015</p>
</th>
<td>0.11</td>
<td>0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2016</p>
</th>
<td>0.15</td>
<td>0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2017</p>
</th>
<td>0.14</td>
<td>0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2018</p>
</th>
<td>0.16</td>
<td>-0.51</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2019</p>
</th>
<td>0.15</td>
<td>-0.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2020</p>
</th>
<td>0.14</td>
<td>0.20</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2021</p>
</th>
<td>0.12</td>
<td>0.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2022</p>
</th>
<td>0.11</td>
<td>0.24</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2023</p>
</th>
<td>0.12</td>
<td>0.23</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2024_2_23_7_43_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="3">
<p>Note: The CES estimate for December 2023 is based on preliminary data.</p>
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p></p>
Exhibit 10.4 Windsor Assignment






EXHIBIT 10.4
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT




For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, STEADFAST ASSET HOLDINGS, INC., a California corporation (“Assignor”), hereby assigns to SIR WINDSOR ON THE RIVER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), all of Assignor's rights and obligations under and in regard to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions dated October 21, 2011 (as may be amended, the “Purchase Agreement”), between Windsor on the River, LLC (“Seller”) and Assignor for the purchase and sale of that certain real property located in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”).


Assignee hereby agrees to and shall assume, perform and be fully responsible for the performance of all of the obligations of Assignor under the Purchase Agreement.


All of the provisions, covenants and agreements contained in the Assignment shall extend to and be binding upon the respective legal representatives, successors and assigns of Assignor and Assignee.  This Assignment represents the entire agreement between Assignor and Assignee with respect to the subject matter of the Assignment , and all prior or contemporaneous agreements regarding such matters are hereby rendered null and void and of no force and effect. 


(SIGNATURES APPEARS ON FOLLOWING PAGE)













WITNESS THE EXECUTION HEREOF, as of this December 1, 2011. 




ASSIGNOR:


STEADFAST ASSET HOLDINGS, INC., 
a California corporation


By:    /s/ Ana Marie del Rio                          


Name:    Ana Marie del Rio                              


Title:    Vice President                                     


ASSIGNEE:


SIR WINDSOR ON THE RIVER, LLC
an Delaware limited liability company


By:     Steadfast Income Advisor, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability         
company, its Manager
                            
                        
By:    /s/ Rodney F. Emery             


Name:    Rodney F. Emery                  


Title:    CEO and President               























Exhibit A


DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND




That certain real property described as:


Real property in the City of Cedar Rapids, County of Linn, State of Iowa, described as follows:
Lot 1 of Windsor-on-the-River First Addition to Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and Lot 2 and Lot 3 of Windsor-on-the-River Second Addition to Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and Lot 4 of Windsor-on-the-River Third Addition to Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and Lot 5 of Windsor-on-the-River Fourth Addition to Cedar Rapids, Iowa; all in Linn County, Iowa
Opinion filed July 8, 2010



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ 

### No. 11

- 10

- 00164

- CR

__________ ROSALIO CARRERA , Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 238 th District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR35132

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The trial court convicted Rosalio Carrera, upon his plea of guilty, of indecency with a child. Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for two years. We dismiss the appeal. The trial court imposed the sentence in open court on January 13, 2010. On June 10, 2010, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. This court notified the parties that the notic e of appeal was not timely and directed appellant to file a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant has filed a response.2

In his response, appellant contends that he was interviewed without properly being
in formed of his rights, tha t he was not appointed a bilingual attorney, that the evidence was questionable because his son

- in

- law was a drug user, that the prosecutor had him sign a document outside the presence of his attorney, that he had been held in violation of his right to a

s peedy trial, that he only signed the plea bargain agreement to be released from incarceration
, that his plea was not voluntary, and that he has been denied due process of law. Appellant does not address the untimeliness of his notice of appeal or whether this court’s jurisdiction has been
invoked. Absent a timely notice of appeal or compliance with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.3, this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 209

- 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998);
Olivo v. State
, 91 8 S.W.2d 519, 522

- 24 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) ; Rodarte v. State , 860 S.W.2d 108,
109

- 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Shute v. State , 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Appellant may be able to secure an out

- of

- time appeal by filing a postconviction writ pursuant to
T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art

. 11.07 (Vernon 2009 ). The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

July 8, 2010 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Strange, J.
#### GRIMMETT v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RY. CO.

No. 27553.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

March 16, 1951.

*336Louis Gray, A. L. Kearns and Sindell & Sindell, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Paul Clarke and Conners & Clarke, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

FREED, District Judge.

Defendant’s Interrogatory No. 1 asked plaintiff to list his income for each month during the year 1949. In answer thereto, and without objecting to the question, the plaintiff replied that he had testified to these matters at a deposition hearing and referred defendant to the deposition record in defendant’s possession. Defendant now moves 'for an order compelling plaintiff to answer the interrogatory.

The answer given is unsatisfactory. Plaintiff will be required to answer fully under oath to the best of his knowledge, Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

Defendant’s request for attorneys fees, as authorized by Rule 37(a), charges that the refusal to answer was without substantial justification. It would appear that plaintiff did not refuse to answer, but rather attempted to answer by reference. Although the answer was improper, this Court is not of the opinion that plaintiff has .refused without -substantial justification. 'The drastic provisions of the Rule should be invoked only when deliberate or flagrant attitude is demonstrated.

The motion for an order will be granted without costs of obtaining said order.