alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 750 

To achieve border security on certain Federal lands along the Southern 

border. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2015 

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. FLAKE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To achieve border security on certain Federal lands along 

the Southern border. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arizona Borderlands 

5 Protection and Preservation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) BORDER SECURITY.—The term ‘‘border se9 curity’’ means— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 750 IS

1 (A) the functioning and operational capa2 bility to conduct continuous and integrated 

3 manned or unmanned, monitoring, sensing, or 

4 surveillance of 100 percent of Southern border 

5 mileage or the immediate vicinity of the South6 ern border; and 

7 (B) the apprehension or turn back of all il8 legal entries across the Southern border during 

9 a fiscal year. 

10 (2) FEDERAL LANDS.—The term ‘‘Federal 

11 lands’’ includes all land under the control of the Sec12 retary concerned that is located within the South13 west border region in the Tucson and Yuma sectors 

14 of United States Border Patrol along the Southern 

15 border. 

16 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

17 the Secretary of Homeland Security. 

18 (4) SECRETARY CONCERNED.—The term ‘‘Sec19 retary concerned’’ means— 

20 (A) with respect to land under the jurisdic21 tion of the Secretary of Agriculture, the Sec22 retary of Agriculture; and 

23 (B) with respect to land under the jurisdic24 tion of the Secretary of the Interior, the Sec25 retary of the Interior. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 750 IS

1 (5) SOUTHERN BORDER.—The term ‘‘Southern 

2 border’’ means the international border between the 

3 United States and Mexico. 

4 SEC. 3. SUPPORT FOR BORDER SECURITY NEEDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—To achieve border security on 

6 Federal lands— 

7 (1) the Secretary and the Secretary concerned, 

8 notwithstanding any other provision of law, shall 

9 provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection per10 sonnel with immediate access to Federal lands for 

11 border security activities, including— 

12 (A) routine motorized patrols; and 

13 (B) the deployment of communications, 

14 surveillance, and detection equipment; and 

15 (2) the Secretary concerned may provide edu16 cation and training to U.S. Customs and Border 

17 Protection personnel on the natural and cultural re18 sources present on individual Federal land units. 

19 (b) INTERMINGLED STATE AND PRIVATE LAND.— 

20 Subsection (a) shall not apply to any private or State21 owned land within the boundaries of Federal lands. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A
KNOWING OR WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATION.

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

      Re: Nuveen Investments, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the "Company") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

            (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Dated as of this 9th day of May 2005.

                                    /s/ Margaret E. Wilson
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Margaret E. Wilson
                                    Senior Vice President, Finance
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 13.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Graña y Montero S.A.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2015, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mónica Miloslavich, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley-Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Mónica Miloslavich        
|Name: Mónica Miloslavich      
|Title: Chief Financial Officer

May 2, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 168 (Thursday, August 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18629]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Commission briefing and business meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Friday, September 8, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: National Place Building, 1331 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 11th 
Floor, Suite 1150, Washington, DC 20245 (Entrance on F Street NW.).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Walch, phone: (202) 376-8371; 
TTY: (202) 376-8116; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#49393c2b25202a282f2f28203b3a093c3a2a2a3b672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b5b5e494742484a4d4d4a4259586b5e58484859054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This business meeting is open to the public. 
There will also be a call-in line for individuals who desire to listen 
to the presentations: 800-310-7032; Conference ID 799-7226.
    Persons with disabilities who need accommodation should contact 
Pamela Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#314258565f5d505f56445056547144425252431f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4a7bdb3bab8b5bab3a1b5b3b194a1a7b7b7a6fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a> at least 
three business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Business Meeting
    A. Discussion and Vote on Report: Working for Inclusion: Time for 
Congress to Enact Federal Legislation to Redress Workplace 
Discrimination Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender 
Americans
    B. Discussion and Vote on Report: Public Education Funding 
Inequality in an Era of Increasing Concentration of Poverty and 
Resegregation
    C. State Advisory Committees
    <bullet> Vote on appointments to the New Jersey State Advisory 
Committee
    <bullet> Vote on appointments to the North Dakota State Advisory 
Committee
    <bullet> Vote on appointments to the Rhode Island State Advisory 
Committee
    D. Management and Operations
    <bullet> Staff Director's Report
    E. [To begin at 11:00 a.m. EST] Presentations on President 
Eisenhower's Civil Rights Legacy and the Creation of the U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights by:
    a. Dawn Hammatt, Director of the Eisenhower Presidential Library
    b. David A Nichols, Author of ``A Matter of Justice, Eisenhower and 
the Beginning of the Civil Rights Movement''
III. Adjourn Meeting

     Dated: August 29, 2017.
Brian Walch,
Director, Communications and Public Engagement.
[FR Doc. 2017-18629 Filed 8-29-17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Thomas Lanny Vlasak as Trustee for the Silber Family Trust v.

TAXCO, INC.

Appellate case number: 01-16-00191-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-49207

Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: December 13, 2017

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

En Banc Court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, 

Bland, Massengale, Brown, Lloyd, and Caughey

Date: January 18, 2018
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling andServicing Agreement datedas of May 1, 2013, by and among RBS COMMERCIAL FUNDING INC., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer,LNRPARTNERS, LLC, as General SpecialServicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as Co-op Special Servicer,TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC., as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2013-C13 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of thisAgreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the periodfrom January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and ofits performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision,and

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicerhas fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2018.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive VicePresident

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### In the Matter of: EQUATOR CORP., Debtor. *796Steven Barry Frankoff, Appellant v. Trustee Kenneth R. Havis, Appellee.

No. 07-20671

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 16, 2008.

Roger Harmon Broach, Houston, TX, for Appellant.

David Ronald Jones, Porter Hedges, Houston, TX, for Appellee.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Steven Barry Frankoff appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment against him. The district court found that a transfer of money from the Debtor to Frankoff was improper, and therefore avoidable, under 11 U.S.C. § 549. After a review of the record and briefs, we find no reversible error. Essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
_______________________________________ __ ___________________ ________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
September 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weave r 137155 (3) Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices TERRY BROOKS,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 137155

MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS,

Defendant.

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $6.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $369.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
September 8, 2008
Clerk
### The Honorable Robert R. Beezer, Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of 1 

### Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. __________ No. 97-1401

__________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri Fredrick Eskridge, * * Defendant - Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] *

__________ Submitted: June 12, 1997 Filed: July 3, 1997

__________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, BEEZER and WOLLMAN, Circuit 1 Judges.

__________ PER CURIAM Frederick Eskridge appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
Suspecting him of carrying illegal drugs, law enforcement officers attempted to detain Eskridge in the Kansas City, Missouri airport while they applied for a search warrant for his person. He assaulted them and fled on foot. While fleeing the officers, Eskridge discarded a package of cocaine that he carried on his person. The officers arrested him shortly thereafter. In a search incident to arrest, the officers discovered three additional packages of cocaine.
Eskridge entered a guilty plea for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute,conditioned on his appeal of his motion to suppress the seized evidence.

On appeal, Eskridge argues his detention amounted to a stop, but not an arrest. We need not address the particulars of the attempted detention. Eskridge’s assault of the officers and his flight provided probable cause for the subsequent arrest. United States v. Dawdy, 46 F.3d 1427, 1431 (8th Cir. 1995). The district court did not err in denying Eskridge’s motion to suppress.

AFFIRMED.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 966 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 966

   To extend the low-interest refinancing provisions under the Local 
Development Business Loan Program of the Small Business Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 15, 2015

  Mrs. Shaheen (for herself and Mr. Isakson) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small 
                     Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the low-interest refinancing provisions under the Local 
Development Business Loan Program of the Small Business Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commercial Real Estate and Economic 
Development Act of 2015'' or the ``CREED Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. LOW-INTEREST REFINANCING UNDER THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS 
              LOAN PROGRAM.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 1122(b) of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 
(15 U.S.C. 696 note) is repealed.
    (b) Restoration of Low-Interest Refinancing Provision.--
Subparagraph (C) of section 502(7) of the Small Business Investment Act 
of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 696(7)) (relating to refinancing not involving 
expansions), as in effect on September 25, 2012, shall be in effect 
during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and 
ending 5 years after that date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 3(a)
                             NORTH SHORE GAS COMPANY

                        ACTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                      BY WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF MEETING

The Board of Directors of the Company has taken the following action by
unanimous Written Consent:

                    RESOLVED, That effective as of the close of
          business on August 7, 1996, the By-Laws of the Company be,
          and they hereby are, amended by replacing Section 7.1 of
          Article VII of the By-Laws in its entirety with the
          following:

                    SECTION 7.1.  CONTRACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS.
          All contracts or obligations of the Company shall be in
          writing and shall be signed either by the Chairman of the
          Board, the President, any Executive Vice President, any Vice
          President, the Treasurer, or any other officer of the
          Company, agent, employee or attorney-in-fact as may be
          designated by the Board, the Chairman of the Board or the
          President pursuant to specific authorizations and, the seal
          of the Company may be attached thereto, duly attested by the
          Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, except contracts
          entered into in the ordinary course of business where the
          amount involved is less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars
          ($500,000), and except contracts for the employment of
          servants or agents, which contracts so excepted may be
          entered into by the Chairman of the Board, the President,
          any Executive Vice President, any Vice President, the
          Treasurer, or by such officers, agents, employees or
          attorneys-in-fact as the Chairman of the Board or the
          President may designate and authorize.  Unless the Board
          shall otherwise determine and direct, all checks or drafts
          and all promissory notes shall be signed by two officers of
          the Company.  When prescribed by the Board, bonds,
          promissory notes, and other obligations of the Company may
          bear the facsimile signature of the officer who is
          authorized to sign such instruments and, likewise, may bear
          the facsimile signature of the Secretary or an Assistant
          Secretary.

                    RESOLVED FURTHER, That the Secretary of the
          Company be, and he hereby is, directed to initial a copy of
          the amended By-Laws presented at this meeting and place it
          with the important papers of this meeting.

<PAGE>

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of NORTH SHORE GAS COMPANY
has executed this Written Consent as of August 6, 1996.


   /s/ Richard E. Terry                  /s/ James Hinchliff
------------------------------          ------------------------------



   /s/ J. Bruce Hasch                    /s/ Kenneth S. Balaskovits
------------------------------          ------------------------------



   /s/ Michael S. Reeves
------------------------------
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2004 of Graphic Packaging Corporation (the‘‘Company’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   | /s/  STEPHEN M. HUMPHREY                      |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  Stephen M. Humphrey                    |
|   |   | Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | Date:  May 6, 2004                       |

 

----