alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.1







Second
Amendment


To
the


Franklin
Covey Co.


2004
Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan





On
November 7, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution to amend sections
2.09 and 13 of the 2004 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan in their
entirety to read as follows:





2.09  Date
of Grant.





The date
an Award is granted to an Eligible Director.  The Date of Grant with
respect to Basic Annual Awards will be the date of the Annual Shareholder
Meeting of each year during the life of the Plan and the Date of Grant for any
Supplemental Grant, shall be a date determined by the board.  If the
New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) is not open on such date, the Date of Grant
will be the next subsequent day on which the NYSE is open.





13.  Annual
Grant of Restricted Stock.





The
Company will award to each director, on the date of the Annual Shareholder
Meeting of each year, a number of Restricted Shares having an aggregate fair
market value of $40,000, rounded up to the nearest whole share.
(logo) ncb

National Cooperative Bank

 

 

 

 

Fe bru a ry 26, 2015

 

RBS Commercial Funding, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: Jim Barnard

600 Washington Blvd. 

Stamford, CT 06901

 

RE:      Annual Statement as to Compliance

WFRBS 2013 C13

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-C13, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB (the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereof that:

 

a .   A review of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.   To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31, 2015.

 

Best Regards,

 

/s/ Karyn Mann

 

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank, N.A.
#### ACCENT PACKAGING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEGGETT & PLATT, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2012-1684.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 8, 2013.

Keith Jaasma, Ewing & Jones, PLLC, of Houston, TX, for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert H. Reckers, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., of Kansas City, MO, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Bart A. Starr and Jonathan N. Zer-ger.

*953PROST, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and con sidered, it is

ORDERED and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
No. 1009.

#### Gosselin *v.*Kelley, Superintendent.

April 29, 1946.

*F. Harold Dubord*for appellant.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Rutledge dissent.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2013-2
Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon.



Date: June 10, 2016



|/s/
Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|American Honda Finance Corporation                   | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Jasmine Laura Maynes v. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-18-00354-CR, 01-18-00355-CR & 01-18-00356-CR

Trial court case numbers: 10CR0891, 16CR2585 & 16CR2586

Trial court: 122nd District Court of Galveston County

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED. 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd___________________________

 Acting for the Court

The en banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Landau, 

Goodman, Hightower, and Countiss.

Justice Higley, not participating.

Date: October 15, 2019
Exhibit 34.2b



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Tothe Board of Directors of Assurant Inc.:

We have
examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that American Security Insurance
Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant, Inc., collectively the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Regulation AB for the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria §1122(d)(1)(i) through §1122(d)(1)(v), §1122(d)(2)(i) through §1122(d)(2)(v),
§1122(d)(2)(vii), §1122(d)(3)(i) through §1122(d)(3)(iv), §1122(d)(4)(i) through §1122(d)(4)(x) and §1122(d)(4)(xiii) through §1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities
performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated
or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the
servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company,
and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

February 15, 2017





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1075 Peachtree Street,
Atlanta, GA 30309-3851

T: (678) 419 1000, www.pwc.com/us
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1705

In re: CRYSTAL VL RIVERS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:18-cv-00061-EKD-JCH)

Submitted: December 4, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Crystal VL Rivers, Petitioner Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

This case comes before the court on a petition for writ of mandamus filed by Crystal 

VL Rivers under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771 (“CVRA”). The CVRA 

applies to crime victims and defines “crime victim” as “a person directly and proximately 

harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of 

Columbia.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(2)(A). A crime victim is entitled to reasonable protection 

from the accused, to notice of court proceedings, to participation in court proceedings, to 

confer with government counsel, to receive restitution, to proceedings free from 

unreasonable delay, and to be treated with fairness. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a). These rights 

must be asserted in the district court and, if the district court denies relief, the movant may 

petition the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3). If such a 

petition is filed, “[t]he court of appeals shall take up and decide such application forthwith 

within 72 hours after the petition has been filed.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3).

*

 If the court of 

appeals denies the relief sought, “the reasons for the denial shall be clearly stated on the 

record in a written opinion.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3).

Rivers previously filed several CVRA motions in the district court, asserting that 

she is a victim of various financial frauds and accusing the Government of violating her 

right to confer. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(5). The district court denied relief, concluding, 

among other things, that Rivers’ own submissions demonstrated that she had received 

ample opportunities to speak with government counsel about the alleged fraud. See Rivers 

* Rivers has explicitly waived this requirement.
3

v. United States, No. 6:18-cv-00061-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va., Mar. 9 & 30, 2020). Having 

reviewed the record and the petition before us, we agree that Rivers has failed to identify a 

CVRA violation. Accordingly, we deny Rivers’ petition, as well as her motion to hold this 

matter in abeyance. 

PETITION DENIED
| Date:      February 11, 2010 |                                  |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                         |                                  |   |
|                         | /s/ ROBERT PUTNAM                     |   |
|                         |                                  |   |
|                         | Robert      Putnam,                   |   |
|                         | Interim      Chief Accounting Officer |   |
|                         | (Principal      Financial Officer)    |   |
|                         |                                  |   |
| Date:      February 11, 2010 |                                  |
|                         |                                  |   |
|                         | /s/ ALFRED H. FALK                    |   |
|                         | Alfred      H. Falk,                  |   |
|                         | President      and CEO,               |   |
|                         | (Principal      Executive Officer)    |   |

----
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 8 

To provide for the approval of the Agreement for Cooperation Between the 

Government of the United States of America and the Government of 

the Kingdom of Norway Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 1, 2016 

Mr. CORKER (for himself and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To provide for the approval of the Agreement for Cooperation 

Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Norway 

Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 8 IS

1 SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION 

2 BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE 

3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOV4 ERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 

5 CONCERNING PEACEFUL USES OF NUCLEAR 

6 ENERGY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the provisions 

8 for congressional consideration of a proposed agreement 

9 for cooperation in subsection d. of section 123 of the 

10 Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), the Agree11 ment for Cooperation Between the Government of the 

12 United States of America and the Government of the 

13 Kingdom of Norway Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear 

14 Energy, done at Washington June 11, 2016, may be 

15 brought into effect on or after the date of the enactment 

16 of this Act, as if all the requirements in such section for 

17 consideration of such agreement had been satisfied, sub18 ject to subsection (b). 

19 (b) APPLICABILITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF

20 1954 AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW.—Upon entering 

21 into effect, the agreement referred to in subsection (a) 

22 shall be subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy 

23 Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) and any other appli24 cable United States law as if such agreement had come 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 8 IS

1 into effect in accordance with the requirements of section 

2 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153). 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |
|--------|--------------|

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kronos Incorporated (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Aron J. Ain, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul A. Lacy, President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   | ____/s/ Aron J. Ain____________________ |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| Dated: | February 9, 2006                        | Aron J. Ain |  
 

Chief Executive Officer

 
 

 

____/s/ Paul A. Lacy___________________

Dated:

February 9, 2006

Paul A. Lacy

 
 

President, Chief Financial Officer

 
 

 

 

 

 

  |
-. x..:*..- 

OFFICE O+‘iWE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 


;‘.a nnisanob d~66 not aeo5marily as* tan the uIsh10e tir 

&ha pmviition 3.0~ the .Pmaf, Wtr, bogInI4 .tpIs aot~‘hwgJ4t. to 

k l Jolne4 a# aqoiienae and pmtaaribIa@ ir%aa.or hprlsonsent a0 pwi5hwnb ror ..h%u rio16tSonr There. &ma exib) jm 

~pplloabla.atatuto, to witi, &t%sla 4664, panal ~3. ita netum, 

and pneoribiag atu+snmnt aa the racy.. 

In ekwotioa nlth'tb queat4on w&r oonaldoratloa 

- 

= 

I. 

.,.the ,&as molng and batting 000~~1~4 war, nst a+ ttaO ohuaotu. 

/ 

Where the Uqtaor Control Aot alqwese2yor by,naewrawy lapllaetion euthorieba the sale or lIQwr, beu em¶ rlnm, 

ana PTOSO be5 the olrom8tanoes unbar whioh:it ma ba sold 

AHl.1. la 4 Is not elailebla, on tha graund thet &6trMei ~:‘~ 

18 latiid oeunpt.ba a ntiaanoa. Thus, sin00 tho Uqwr Gang 

tral hut euthorI;ie8 petits r0r paokaga atoms to ssu lIqob*t 

and mdhorlws. pomits ror thb sala or beer r0r oonswptilon~ 

on ~JAO p&mIaw a paokage star.wItha patitoeanatbo on- 

.jqiaod for sdng,lIquor, nor oould the rot&U., baar per& 

haldsr bo annJo$nad ram nrainteinl~ a-plaoa whars persona.r+ 

sort ror dAnkIng befar, an lntoxioetiag Uquor. 

In Me Parker oaae, swre, the ella#ssb nulaanaa sxisb- 

'06 be a&y* area, Itlatoba notadthst tha suItre.nat t0 

~)a#5 the laai~tOIIMO6 Or pT6dSSO Whercl &Em Ol? gift5 Of fntorieating liquors WON mada; but premisoa, (a denea hall) to 

rhioh the publI4 resorted to drink Intoxicreting liquor. Tba 

Liqwr $mcrOl dot da.8 not dsflne a. an oifanab the wintsnWO0 

Of &WI&~WJ to tiah the mbllo resort CO drink int-Ia.tI.6 

lIqu&a, al&her in a dry araa or a wet as.&. Tha 0fSsu.a danowoad by the Ast I8 tha unlawful sales aa that it is a@erSnt, 

W&U the perkar ciacia. that W. rrruet look to Artlola 4664 0lonO 

for t&r’ offwas :and :pi3fmltyT 
Bsnowble &me ~Doughty, &., ,P&e 5 

. . . 7’ ‘* 

Uuder t&mi0ofO stated in your letber it la apparent 

.$hat the ‘proprfeg&;.of the danoe hall does not have any permit 

rir lloanae authorl~~d by.the Liquor aontrol Aot and that the 

plaoe ti. qusst$,on~~jthe~ danoe hall) la a plaoe where persons 

resort in ~hmyalging of two or .bmre persons to the room for 

the purpo& o~&Wklng .fntolioating 1lqUOT. 

.” :~, 

Too ‘are: tiiierefore advised that under AxMole 4664 

,.a danoe h,all lx;uet territory maintained aa. a plaoe to whloh 

.,mmbers or the pub110 oommnly resort in mmb,er& of two or 

moma to’ the mom -for the purpose oi’ drinking lutoxloatlng llquors’ may be enjoined ae a oomon nulsanos ii- t~he proprietor 

does not hold La,,per&t’ authorizing him to sell the .lkquors eon- I’. 

rrrrpei\ for oonsumption on the premisea, oi ii t&3 liquors oonsumad thereon ar6 not suoh as are authorized to tie sold for 

oonmmption on the- premisea, 

. ,.:,~ 

kustiiig that the foregoing fully answers your ‘lnquby, we are’ 

Yours very trUly
|    |                                                                                                                |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc.; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |
| /s/ DERIC S. EUBANKS    |   |
| Deric S. Eubanks        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
Richard E. Gerstein Employment Letter dated 9/3/08



 Exhibit 10.35 
 [SEARS HOLDINGS LETTERHEAD] 
 September 3, 2008 
 Mr. Richard E. Gerstein 
 Dear Richard, 
 We are pleased to extend to you our offer to serve as Senior Vice President, Marketing—SHC, reporting to the W. Bruce Johnson, Interim Chief Executive Officer and President. Your new position and
compensation package became effective August 30, 2008. 
 The key elements of your compensation package are as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	 Annual base salary at a rate of $550,000. 


  

	 	•	 	 Annual target incentive opportunity remains at 75% of your base salary. Your target incentive under the 2008 Annual Incentive Plan will be prorated based on the
amount of time at each compensation level (base salary and annual incentive target) through January 31, 2009, the last day of SHC’s 2008 fiscal year. The actual amount of the incentive you earn depends on how well you and the company
perform. Any annual incentive payable with respect to a fiscal year will be paid by April 15 of the following year, provided that you are actively employed at the payment date. 


 The table below summarizes the changes in your compensation 
  

														
	  	  	 Title
	  	Base Salary	 	 	Target
Incentive	 	 	Total
Target Cash	 
	 Current
	  	SVP, Chief Marketing Officer-Sears	  	$	480,000	 	 	75	%	 	$	840,000	 
	 New
	  	SVP, Marketing - SHC	  	$	550,000	 	 	75	%	 	$	962,500	 
	 Increase
	  		  	 	14.6	%	 			 	 	14.6	%

 Richard, we are excited about the important contributions you will continue to make to the company in your new
position. 
 If you need additional information or clarification, please call. 
 Sincerely, 
  

	
	 /s/ William R. Harker

	William R. Harker