alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1

|                                                |                                          | Three Months Ended |          | Six Months Ended
|----------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ------------------ | -------- | ----------------
|                                                |                                          | June 30,           |          | June 30,        
|                                                |                                          | 2002               | 2001     |                 
|DETERMINATION OF RATIO OF                       |                                          |                    |          |                 
|EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                       |                                          |                    |          |                 
|Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | $2,593                                   |                    | $(2,006) |                 
|Fixed charges                                   |                                          |                    |          |                 
|                                                | Amortization of deferred financing costs | 270                |          | 239             
|                                                | Interest expense                         | 4,565              |          | 4,949           
|Earnings before fixed charges                   | 7,428                                    |                    | 3,182    |                 
|Fixed charges                                   |                                          |                    |          |                 
|                                                | Amortization of deferred financing costs | 270                |          | 239             
|                                                | Interest expense                         | 4,565              |          | 4,949           
|Total fixed charges                             | 4,835                                    |                    | 5,188    |                 
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              | 1.54X                                    |                    | 0.61X    |
# oes_national_1997
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40633

Conference Calendar

 

JOHN A. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN J. EASTLAND, Attorney at Law;

DAVID DOBBS, Assistant District Attorney,

Smith County,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:01-CV-486

- - - - - - - - - -

December 11, 2002

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John A. Williams, Texas prisoner # 559903, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as

frivolous. Williams was convicted of aggravated sexual assault. 

He alleged below that the attorney who represented him at trial

committed malpractice and breached his contract to represent

Williams because he provided ineffective assistance of counsel. 
No. 02-40633 

-2-

Williams also alleged that the Assistant District Attorney (ADA)

who prosecuted the case conspired with his attorney to deprive

him of a fair trial and to allow him to receive an excessive

sentence. The district court held that the ADA was entitled to

prosecutorial immunity and that the claims against Williams’

attorney were barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994),

until such time as he was able to show that his conviction had

been invalidated. 

Williams has abandoned his claim against the ADA by failing

to brief this issue on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d

222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). He argues that the district court

improperly construed his complaint as a habeas action when it was

based on breach of contract and malpractice. Because Williams’

claims are based on his attorney’s alleged ineffective

assistance, they are barred by Heck because he has not shown that

his conviction has been reversed, expunged, invalidated, or

otherwise called into question. Therefore, the district court

did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Williams’ complaint as

frivolous. 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000887022
<NAME> EVE HOLDINGS INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6
<PP&E>                                               2
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,553
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,112
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,343
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(logo) C-III | C-III AssetManagement 

 

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

The undersigned, Barry davis,President of C-III Asset Management LLC (*f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC*),the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement datedas of May 1, 2013, relating to the **J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial MortgageSecurities Trust 2013-LC11, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Series 2013-LC11** (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifiesas follows:

 

1.       a review of the activities of the Special Servicer andof its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during thecalendar year 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) has been made under theundersigned’s supervision;

 

2.       to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based onsuch review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under thePooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2019, I have hereuntosigned my name.

 

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a

Delaware limited liabilitycompany 

 

 

JPM 2013-LC11
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,123
<SECURITIES>                                    83,133
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,436
<PP&E>                                          24,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,359
<BONDS>                                          6,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           192
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,912
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,062
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   721
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,975)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,975)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,975)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.15)


</TABLE>
Exhibit (10)(r)
 Amendment
 Defined Contribution  Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(Amended and Restated as of December 1, 2007)
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Whereas,
 Now Therefore,
 Separation from
Service
    
    Means the Employee retires or otherwise has a separation from service
from the company as defined under Code Section 409A and any applicable
regulations. The Plan Administrator will determine, consistent with
the requirements of Code Section 409A and any applicable regulations,
to what extent a person on a leave of absence, including on paid sick
leave pursuant to Company policy, has incurred a Separation from
Service. Notwithstanding the above, a Separation from Service will
occur consistent with the requirements of Code Section 409A when it is
reasonably anticipated that the future level of bona fide services
provided by the Employee (whether as an employee or as an independent
contractor) will be no more than 45% of the average level of bona fide
services performed by the Employee (whether as an employee or as an
independent contractor) over the immediately preceding 36 month period
(or the full period of services, if less than 36 months).
 1




---



##### 



Signed this 21 day of December, 2008.CMS Energy Corporation:/s/ John M. Butler

John M. ButlerSenior Vice President  Human Resources and Administrative ServicesAttest:/s/ Catherine M. Reynolds

Catherine M. ReynoldsVice President and Secretary
 2
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the
Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Form 10-Q.
 Dated: August 11, 2008
    /s/ Jeffrey A. GreenJeffrey A. GreenChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2013-3 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 27, 2014



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|SLM Funding LLC
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff

MERILLAT INDUSTRIES, INC./MASCO CORPORATION AND MICHIGAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2369-95-4 PER CURIAM MARCH 19, 1996 MARY LEE PRESGRAVES

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Thomas G. Bell, Jr.; Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, on brief), for appellants. (George Warren Shanks, on brief), for appellee.

Merillat Industries, Inc. and its insurer contend that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that Mary Lee Presgraves' bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome qualifies as a compensable occupational disease within the meaning of "disease" under the Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act").

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in Stenrich Group v. Jemmott , ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act"). Accordingly, we reverse the commission's decision.

Reversed.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Leah Nivison, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report onForm 10-K of the GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-GCJ12 (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, ParkBridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant, Computershare Trust Company, National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on and afterNovember 1, 2021, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and afterNovember 1, 2021.

 

 

 

Dated:March 15,2022

 

 

/s/ Leah Nivison

Leah Nivison

Chief Executive Officer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-14-00309-CV

_________________

IN RE MUJTABA ALI KHAN

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 21, 2014, Mujtaba Ali Khan petitioned for mandamus to compel the 

Judge of the 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, to vacate its 

November 25, 2013 protective order and compel discovery concerning the issuance 

of a Texas medical license to the real party in interest, Haroon Chaudhry. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 52.3. Relator filed a motion for temporary relief from a July 28, 2014 

trial setting. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(a). We have carefully reviewed Relator’s 

petition and the accompanying mandamus record, and we conclude that Relator 

has not established an abuse of discretion for which an appeal will not be an 

adequate remedy. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 
2

(Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). We overrule Relator’s issue and deny mandamus 

and temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PETITION DENIED. 

PER CURIAM

Submitted on July 23, 2014

Opinion Delivered July 24, 2014

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 8 

AN ACT 

To provide for the approval of the Agreement for Cooperation 

Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Norway 

Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 8 ES

1 SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION 

2 BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE 

3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOV4 ERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 

5 CONCERNING PEACEFUL USES OF NUCLEAR 

6 ENERGY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the provisions 

8 for congressional consideration of a proposed agreement 

9 for cooperation in subsection d. of section 123 of the 

10 Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), the Agree11 ment for Cooperation Between the Government of the 

12 United States of America and the Government of the 

13 Kingdom of Norway Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear 

14 Energy, done at Washington June 11, 2016, may be 

15 brought into effect on or after the date of the enactment 

16 of this Act, as if all the requirements in such section for 

17 consideration of such agreement had been satisfied, sub18 ject to subsection (b). 

19 (b) APPLICABILITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF

20 1954 AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW.—Upon entering 

21 into effect, the agreement referred to in subsection (a) 

22 shall be subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy 

23 Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) and any other appli24 cable United States law as if such agreement had come 
3 

†S 8 ES

1 into effect in accordance with the requirements of section 

2 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153). 

Passed the Senate December 10 (legislative day, December 9), 2016. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 8 

AN ACT 

To provide for the approval of the Agreement for 

Uses of Nuclear Energy. the Kingdom of Norway Concerning Peaceful United States of America and the Government of Cooperation Between the Government of the
# National Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve Week, 2017

Throughout our Nation's history, Americans from all walks of life have made tremendous sacrifices in defense of our freedom. Today, more than one million citizen soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, and coastguardsmen continue this proud legacy as members of the National Guard and Reserve. During National Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve Week, we express our gratitude to the employers and communities who support those brave men and women.

Employer support for the National Guard and Reserve is important to our ability to sustain an all-volunteer force. Employers play a vital role in easing the transitions our national guardsmen and reservists must make from civilian life to military service and back again. Whether they are participating in weekend training in support of readiness or deploying in response to a crisis at home and abroad, our national guardsmen and reservists are more effective when they have the support of civilian employers.

Our Nation salutes our employers and business leaders who, often at their own expense, back their employees who serve in the National Guard and Reserve. As President, I will continue to focus on providing our men and women in uniform and their families with access to the services, benefits, and care they so deserve. I encourage all Americans to join with our employers in facilitating the service our national guardsmen and reservists provide to our Nation and honoring the sacrifices they make in defense of our security.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim August 20 through August 26, 2017, as National Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve Week. I call upon all Americans to join me in expressing our heartfelt thanks to the civilian employers who provide critical support to the men and women of the National Guard and Reserve. I also call on State and local officials, private organizations, and all military commanders to observe this week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand seventeen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-second.

[FR Doc. 2017-18142

Billing code 3295-F7-P