alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.33**

 

**CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE**

 

October 26, 2020

 

| **PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: USD$37,613.17** |  **DUE: April 23, 2020** |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------|

   

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Allied Corp. (the "**Borrower**" or the “**Company**”), company incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada, hereby promises to pay **Sawasawa Limited**(the "**Lender**"), at such address or at such other place as the Lender may from time to time designate by written notice to the Borrower, the principal amount of thirty-seven thouisand six hundred thirteen and 17/100 ($37,613.17) DOLLARS, ON DEMAND at any time after 179 days from the date hereof (the "**Principal Amount**"), in lawful money of the United States of America, with simple interest at 10% per annum..

 

The Borrower may pre-pay the Principal Amount and any unpaid interest or any portion thereof at any time and from time to time without notice, further interest, bonus or penalty provided, however, that a minimum of six months interest shall be payable from the date hereof regardless of such repayment date.

 

At the option of Lender, this note is convertible at any time through that date which is 179 days from the date of issuance at a conversion price of $1.25 per share. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by both parties, at no time will the Lender convert any amount of this Note into common stock that would result in the Lender owning more than 9.9% of the common stock outstanding. 

 

At the option of the Lender upon closing of any equity based financing for the Company, Lender may require the Company to redeem this Note (to the extent available as net proceeds from any such financing) through repayment of any and all principal amount remaining due together with any accrued but unpaid interest, without further interest, bonus or penalty provided, however, that a minimum of six months interest shall be payable from the date hereof through such redemption date.

 

The Company hereby grants to Lender a security interest in the Company’s collateral pursuant to the terms of that certain Security Agreement of even date herewith, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A hereto (the “Security Interest”).

 

PRESENTMENT for payment, demand, protest and notice of dishonour and protest hereof are hereby waived.

 

THIS PROMISSORY NOTE is governed by and shall be interpreted pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada and all federal laws of the United States of America applicable therein.

 

THIS PROMISSORY NOTE is not assignable by the Borrower without the prior written consent of the Lender.

 

| **ALLIED CORP.** |                                |
|------------------|--------------------------------|
|             |                           |   |
| By:              | */s/ Calum Hughes*             |  |
|                  | Name: Calum Hughes             |   |
|                  | Title: Chief Executive Officer |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         523,274
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,585,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,600
<INVENTORY>                                  1,132,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,924,080
<PP&E>                                         300,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                 418,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,235,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,318,185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           49,397
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,588
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,235,543
<SALES>                                      7,773,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,773,131
<CGS>                                        6,218,054
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,164,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             140,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,720,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,720,606)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,720,606)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2.1



CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302



I, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ruthigen, Inc.; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: July 23, 2014 | /s/ Sameer Harish                                                                  
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Sameer Harish
        Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit
32










CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report
of OrthoLogic Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2008as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), eachof John M.
Holliman, III, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Les M.
Taeger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of his knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.







Date:May7, 2008








/s/ John M.
Holliman, III


John M.
Holliman, III


Principal
Executive Officer








/s/ Les M.
Taeger


Les M.
Taeger


Chief
Financial Officer






A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to OrthoLogic Corp. and will be retained by OrthoLogic Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Jeffery DIEFFENBACH, petitioner, v. John Brian HAWORTH, et al.

No. 09-1451.

Oct. 4, 2010.

Case below, 356 FecLAppx. 529.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 32.2


   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                                      2002

     In  connection  with the  filing  of  Zunicom,  Inc.  and  Subsidiary  (the
"Company")  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),I,  John C. Rudy,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to Rule  13a-14(b)  of the  Exchange  Act and 18 U.S.C.  (SS) 1350,  as
enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
             Material  respects,   the   financial   condition  and  results  of
             operations of the Company,


/s/ John C. Rudy
----------------------
John C. Rudy
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer

August 13, 2007




























                                Exhibit 32.2 - 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 13

- 00045

- CV

Jeanine DOMINGUEZ

, Appellant

v.

BANK OF AMERICA

, Appellee

From the County Court a t Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 381930

Honorable Irene Rios, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 6, 2013

DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The appellee was served with a copy of

Appellant’s motion; Appellee has not filed a response . Therefore, we grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.1(a)( 1 ). Costs of this appeal a re taxed against

Appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 58 

Expressing the sense of Congress that rates for inmate calling service should 

not exceed the affordable modified rate caps adopted by the Federal 

Communications Commission. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2016 

Mr. BOOKER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that rates for inmate calling service should not exceed the affordable modified 

rate caps adopted by the Federal Communications Commission. 

Whereas an estimated 5,000,000 United States children have, 

or have had, a parent in prison or jail; 

Whereas phone calls make it easier for families of incarcerated individuals to maintain positive relationships with 

their loved ones who are incarcerated; 

Whereas phone calls help to reduce recidivism and promote 

the well-being of children; 

Whereas a reduction in recidivism rates by just 1 percent 

would save United States taxpayers $250,000,000 per 

year in correctional costs; 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 58 IS 

Whereas families of incarcerated individuals frequently experience financial hardship because of the loss of a key 

wage earner; 

Whereas the cost of maintaining contact with incarcerated 

loved ones through in-person visits can be prohibitive; 

Whereas written correspondence, especially with small children and disabled individuals, can be an inadequate way 

of maintaining communication; and 

Whereas the Federal Communications Commission has been 

steadfast in its efforts, in accordance with its authority 

under the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 

et seq.)— 

(1) to bring about a compromise on inmate calling 

service rate caps; and 

(2) to ensure that those rates are just and reasonable: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) rates for inmate calling service should not 

4 exceed the affordable modified rate caps adopted by 

5 the Federal Communications Commission as of the 

6 date of the adoption of this resolution; and 

7 (2) reduced inmate calling service rates should 

8 be implemented swiftly because of the importance of 

9 inmate calling service as a rehabilitative means of 

10 communication. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                             



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                              EQUITRAC CORPORATION

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                    (in thousands, except earnings per share)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED          NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                            NOVEMBER 30,               NOVEMBER 30,
                                                       -------------------         -------------------
                                                        1997         1996           1997          1996
                                                       -----         -----         -----         -----
<S>                                                    <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>  
Weighted average number of common shares
    outstanding                                        3,497         3,413         3,483         3,402

Common share equivalents arising from dilutive
    options                                              282           165           246           139
                                                       -----         -----         -----         -----
                                                       3,779         3,578         3,729         3,541
                                                       =====         =====         =====         =====

Earnings per share                                     $0.22         $0.18         $0.61         $0.53
                                                       =====         =====         =====         =====



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America v. 385.93 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH AND THE TOWN OF NEWINGTON, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, and Patrick J. Coakley, et al.

Civ. A. No. 1193.

United States District Court D. New Hampshire.

Dec. 2, 1954.

*558William Maynard, Asst. U. S. Atty., Plymouth, N. H., for plaintiff.

Burns, Calderwood & Bryant, Donald R. Bryant, Dover, N. H., for Portsmouth Country Club.

CONNOR, District Judge.

This action came on to be heard on motion of the plaintiff to determine all questions of title to Tract No. A-132, in said action. The Portsmouth Country Club, one of the defendants, in answer alleged that it held title in fee. Advising the court that it was content to rest upon the pleadings, it did not appear at the hearing.

The plaintiff offered the only evidence, which was an abstract of title to the tract. Findings of fact were made to the effect that title in fee simple was in Roland J. Paquette and Madeline G. Paquette, and on August 4, 1954, a decree of title was entered. An order for payment of just compensation was entered on August 5. Thereafter, on August 28, the said Portsmouth Country Club filed a motion “that the court reconsider” the findings of fact and decree, and grant it opportunity to appear and be heard thereon.

The motion is novel, and I am unaware of any procedure which would authorize its filing, much less its consideration. The proceedings herein involved were in the nature of a trial by a court sitting in equity, and at most it can be treated as a motion for a new trial. Thus it falls within the purview of Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and the time limitation fixed by Section (b) therein was not met. Moreover, Rule 6(b), F.R. C.P., deprives the court of the power to enlarge the time for filing such motion. Both rules are supportive of the longstanding policy that objections to judgments must be promptly asserted. A sufficient reason for this requirement is the likely change of the respective positions of the parties which naturally results following entry of judgment. If it is to be assumed that the proceedings were not a trial, the motion “to reconsider” would still be subject to the mandatory terms of Rule 59(b). Jusino v. Morales & Tio, 1 Cir., 1944, 139 F.2d 946; Safety Stores, Inc. v. Coe, 1943, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 19, 136 F.2d 771, 148 A.L.R. 782; Boro Hall Corp. v. General Motors Corp., D.C.E.N.Y.1947, 6 F.R.D. 539.

It follows that this motion must be and it hereby is denied.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00211-CV

Ex Parte Armando Cardoza Rodriguez

On appeal from the

197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2016-DCL-1267-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 26, 2017
#### Eric L. TOLBERT, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Lieutenant BURKE; Sergeant Williams; Correctional Officer Brumell; Correctional Officer Phifer; Correctional Officer Royster; Correctional Officer Moony; Correctional Officer Fields; Correctional Officer Melton; Dennis Rowland; Captain Austin, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-7401.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 8, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 16, 2008.

Eric L. Tolbert, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric L. Tolbert appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Tolbert v. Burke,*No. 5:06-ct-03077-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *618materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to thebest of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2004 of Graphic Packaging Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’) filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|   | /s/ STEPHEN  M. HUMPHREY                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  Stephen M. Humphrey                    |
|   | Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Date:  August 5, 2004                    |

 

----
II 

Calendar No. 39 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 905 

[Report No. 114–16] 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 

on eligibility for the alternative tax for certain small insurance companies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2015 

Mr. HATCH, from the Committee on Finance, reported the following original 

bill; which was read twice and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitation on eligibility for the alternative tax for 

certain small insurance companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY FOR 

4 ALTERNATIVE TAX FOR CERTAIN SMALL IN5 SURANCE COMPANIES. 

6 (a) INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON PREMIUMS.— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 905 PCS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 

2 831(b)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

3 is amended by striking ‘‘$1,200,000’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘$2,200,000’’. 

5 (2) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Paragraph (2) 

6 of section 831(b) of such Code is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(C) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

9 case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 

10 year after 2015, the dollar amount set forth in 

11 subparagraph (A)(i) shall be increased by an 

12 amount equal to— 

13 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

14 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de15 termined under section 1(f)(3) for such 

16 calendar year by substituting ‘calendar 

17 year 2013’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in sub18 paragraph (B) thereof. 

19 If the amount as adjusted under the preceding 

20 sentence is not a multiple of $50,000, such 

21 amount shall be rounded to the next lowest 

22 multiple of $50,000.’’. 

23 (b) STUDY.—Not later than February 11, 2016, the 

24 Secretary of the Treasury shall submit to the Committee 

25 on Finance of the Senate a report on the abuse of captive 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 905 PCS

1 insurance companies for estate planning purposes. Such 

2 report shall include legislative recommendations for ad3 dressing any such abuses. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

7 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CONTINUOUS LEVY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 6331(h) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik10 ing ‘‘30 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘45 percent’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to payments made after 180 days 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 39 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 905 

[Report No. 114–16] 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

native tax for certain small insurance companies. increase the limitation on eligibility for the alterAPRIL 14, 2015 

Read twice and placed on the calendar 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS