alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


**Section
      1350 Certification -- Principal Financial
      Officer**




Citizens
      Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citizens
      Financial Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30,
      2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”) I, Len E. Schweitzer, Vice President and Treasurer of the
      Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






By:
            /s/
                Len E. SchweitzerLen
                E. SchweitzerVice
                President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
                Officer




Date:
      August 14, 2006




A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
      other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
      signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
      written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Citizens
      Financial Corporation and will be retained by CFC and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


The
      foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered
      filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
#### French *v.*Carter and others.

*Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

February 12, 1883.)

Shipman, J.

The demurrer of the defendant Oliver S. Carter, in the above-entitled cause, is overruled, with leave to the said defendant to answer the bill within 30 days after the entry of the order overruling the demurrer. The plaintiff is entitled to his costs to the date of the hearing upon the demurrer.
EXHIBIT 31.1.1



CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302



I, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ruthigen, Inc.; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: July 23, 2014 | /s/ Hojabr Alimi                                                                                                                                
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Hojabr Alimi
        Chief Executive Officer, Chief Science Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
        (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to my knowledge, the AmendmentNo. 1 on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 of Graphic PackagingCorporation (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ STEPHEN M. HUMPHREY                      |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Stephen M. Humphrey                    |
|   |   | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | August  9, 2005                              |

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES R. FORRESTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1276

[November 24, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Krista Marx, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502017CF010881A.

James R. Forrester, Sneads, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, KLINGENSMITH and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2


   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                                      2002


     In  connection  with the  filing  of  Zunicom,  Inc.  and  Subsidiary  (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),I,  John C. Rudy,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to Rule  13a-14(b)  of the  Exchange  Act and 18 U.S.C.  (SS) 1350,  as
enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

         (2)The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company,


/s/ John C. Rudy
----------------------
John C. Rudy
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer

November 12, 2007



























                                Exhibit 32.2 - 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: JASON JONES,

 

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00237-CR

Appeal from

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 970D08935-171-1)

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right 

of appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial 

court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of 

appeal as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than 

January 20, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6

th day of December, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of OrthoLogic Corp. (the "COMPANY")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Sherry A. Sturman,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Sherry A. Sturman
---------------------------------
Sherry A. Sturman
Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK

#### Camille Thomas v. Kevin Jarrett et al.

February 11, 2000

Case No. (Law) L99-1032

By Judge Everett A. Martin, Jr.

I have reviewed the authorities cited at the hearing on the 4th *inst.*I agree with the rationale stated in *Clatterbuck*v. *Doe,*24 Va. Cir. 341 (1991), and *State Farm*v. *Kuharik,*179 Ga. App. 568, 347 S.E.2d 281 (1986), and Ithus sustain the demurrer to the amended motion for judgment’s claim for punitive damages against John Doe.

In the amended motion for judgment, the plaintiff alleges that Kevin Jarrett was racing his automobile at an excessive speed with that of John Doe and while under the influence of intoxicants, his blood alcohol content being 0.15% or greater. She further alleges that this operation was one-half mile from the intersection of Interstates 64 and 264. It is a matter of common knowledge that this is one ofthe most heavily traveled sections of highway in southeast Virginia. She seeks punitive damages from Jarrett under both the common law and Code of Virginia § 8.01-44.5. Jarrett has demurred to only the common law claim.

The law Jarrett cites establishes that the propriety of an award ofpunitive damages must be determined by the facts of each case. *Huffman*v. *Love,*245 Va. 311, 315, 427 S.E.2d 357, 360 (1993). I find the facts *as pleaded*more egregious than those in the cases in which punitive damages were not allowed, but less egregious than those in which punitive damages were allowed. I thus believe it would be improper to strike the plaintiffs claim for common law punitive damages on demurrer. Whether the evidence adduced at trial will allow the submission of the issue to the jury is for the determination of the trial judge.

*473As no demurrer has been filed to the plaintiff’s claim for statutory punitive damages, evidence of Jarrett’s consumption of alcohol will be before the jury and I do not believe Mr. Rigney would likely be granted a mistrial.
#### William A. BRANDT, Jr., etc., petitioner, v. FIRST UNION CORPORATION, et al.

No. 96-1245.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 12, 1997.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL OSBOURNE
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 1292

[ July 20, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Edward H. Merrigan , Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 013288

CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney Gen eral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C.J.

, D AMOORGIAN and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6148

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RYAN LEE ZATER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (3:00-cr-00626-CMC-1)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed in part dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam 

opinion.

Ryan Lee Zater, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Lee Zater appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion for reduction of sentence. We agree with the 

district court that neither 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) nor 

Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 authorizes such a reduction, and we 

therefore affirm the district court’s ruling.

The court also ruled that Zater’s motion was, in effect, an 

unauthorized successive motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) over which it lacked jurisdiction. The district court’s 

determination that it lacked jurisdiction over a successive 

motion without authorization from this court is not debatable or 

wrong. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244, 2253(c)(1)(B), 2255(h) (2012). 

Therefore, to the extent Zater seeks to challenge that decision,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm in part and dismiss in part. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART,

DISMISSED IN PART
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41616-41617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18598]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Hanford

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 21, 2017, the Department of Energy (DOE) published a 
notice of open meeting announcing a meeting on September 6-7, 2017, of 
the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Hanford. 
This

[[Page 41617]]

notice announces the cancellation of this meeting.

DATES: The meeting scheduled for September 6-7, 2017, announced in the 
August 21, 2017, issue of the Federal Register (FR Doc. 2017-17600, 82 
FR 39572), is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Holmes, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Richland Operations Office, P.O. Box 550, H5-20, 
Richland, WA, 99352; Phone: (509) 376-5803; or Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7dcc5dec4c3d2d999db99dfd8dbdad2c4f7c5db99d3d8d299d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="553e273c2621303b7b397b3d3a393830261527397b313a307b323a23">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on August 24, 2017.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-18598 Filed 8-31-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2


   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.
              SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of Zunicom,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries  (the
"Company")  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, Julie Sansom-Reese,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350,
as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;
                    and

                (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                    in all material respects, the financial condition and
                    results of operations of the Company,


/s/ Julie Sansom-Reese
----------------------
Julie Sansom-Reese
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)

November 15, 2004



























                               Exhibit 32.2 - 1
(March 15, 1994)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Velez, Appellant.

[609 NYS2d 783]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered January 17, 1992, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years to run consecutively with his prior felony conviction, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that his plea was not knowingly or voluntarily made has not been preserved for review since he failed to move to vacate or withdraw his plea *(People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636), and we decline to consider it in the interest of justice. In any event, we would find it to be meritless. Concur —Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Exhibit 10.5**AMENDMENT NO. 1****TO****THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**     This Amendment No. 1 to Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this“Amendment”) is entered into this 7th day of August, 2005, by and between OrthoLogic Corp.,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Sherry A. Sturman (“Employee”), andamends the Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective as of November 8, 2004 betweenthe Company and Employee (the “Employment Agreement”).RECITALS :     1. Election by Employee. The date in Section 8 of the Employment Agreement as ofwhich the Employee can make an election is hereby changed from June 30, 2005 to June 30, 2006.     Except as expressly modified herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force andeffect. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms and provisions of theEmployment Agreement and the terms and provisions of this Amendment, the terms and provisions ofthis Amendment shall govern and control. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each ofwhich shall be deemed an original, but all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one andthe same instrument.     This Amendment No. 1 to Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement is executed as of thedate first above written.   ORTHOLOGIC CORP. EMPLOYEE   /s/ James M. Pusey /s/ Sherry A. Sturman   James M. Pusey Sherry A. SturmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1



                                   EXHIBIT 21


                  ZENITH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES



     State or Other
     Jurisdiction of Incorporation


       Cableproductos de Chihuahua, S.A. de C.V.         Mexico
       Electro Partes de Matamoros, S.A. de C.V.         Mexico
       Interocean Advertising Corporation                New York
       Interocean Advertising Corporation of California  California
       Interocean Advertising Corporation of Illinois    Illinois
       Productos Magneticos de Chihuahua, S.A. de C.V.   Mexico
       Partes de Television de Reynosa, S.A. de C.V.     Mexico
       Radio Componentes de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.         Mexico
       Telson, S.A. de C.V.                              Mexico
       Zenco de Chihuahua, S.A. de C.V.                  Mexico
       Zenith Distributing Corporation of Illinois       Illinois
       Zenith Distributing Corporation of New York       New York
       Zenith Distributing Corporation-West              California
       Zenith Distributing Corporation of Arizona        Arizona
       Zenith Electronics Corporation of Pennsylvania    Pennsylvania
       Zenith Electronics Corporation of Texas           Texas
       Zenith Electronics (Europe) Limited               England
       Zenith Electronics (Ireland) Limited              Ireland
       Zenith/Inteq, Inc.                                Delaware
       Zenith Microcircuits Corporation                  Delaware
       Zenith Radio Canada Ltd/Zenith Radio Canada Ltee  Canada
       Zenith Taiwan Corporation                         Taiwan
       Zenith Video Tech Corporation                     Delaware
       Zenith Video Tech Corporation-Florida             Delaware
       Zentrans, Inc.                                    Delaware
       Zenith Finance Corporation                        Delaware



* All subsidiaries are wholly-owned by Zenith Electronics Corporation except
for Radio Componentes de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Cableproductos de Chihuahua S.A. de C.V.




                                     108
Exhibit 32
 
 
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capstone Therapeutics Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of John M. Holliman, III, Executive Chairman and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Les M. Taeger, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Date: May 13, 2011
 
 
 /s/ John M. Holliman, III
 John M. Holliman, III
 Executive Chairman
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 /s/ Les M. Taeger
 Les M. Taeger
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Capstone Therapeutics  Corp. and will be retained by Capstone Therapeutics Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Capstone Therapeutics Corp.
 (formerly OrthoLogic Corp.)
 (the “Company”)
 Exhibit Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
 For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 Exhibit

No.
Description
Incorporated by Reference To:
Filed Herewith10.1
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement dated January 5, 2004 by and between Phoenix Investors #20, L.L.C. and Capstone Therapeutics Corp.

X31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as amended

X31.2
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as amended

X32
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350*
 
 
 
 
 
 
 * Furnished herewith