alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 637 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 637

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and modify the 
                   railroad track maintenance credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2015

Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Moran, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Isakson, 
 Mr. Casey, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. Blumenthal) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and modify the 
                   railroad track maintenance credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Short Line Railroad Rehabilitation 
and Investment Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF RAILROAD TRACK MAINTENANCE 
              CREDIT.

    (a) Extension of Credit.--Section 45G(f) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``January 1, 2015'' and inserting 
``January 1, 2017''.
    (b) Expenditures.--Subsection (d) of section 45G of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified railroad track maintenance 
expenditures) is amended by striking ``for maintaining'' and all that 
follows and inserting ``for maintaining--
                    ``(A) in the case of taxable years beginning after 
                December 31, 2004, and before January 1, 2015, railroad 
                track (including roadbed, bridges, and related track 
                structures) owned or leased as of January 1, 2005, by a 
                Class II or Class III railroad (determined without 
                regard to any consideration for such expenditures given 
                by the Class II or Class III railroad which made the 
                assignment of such track), and
                    ``(B) in the case of taxable years beginning after 
                December 31, 2014, railroad track (including roadbed, 
                bridges, and related track structures) owned or leased 
                as of January 1, 2015, by a Class II or Class III 
                railroad (determined without regard to any 
                consideration for such expenditures given by the Class 
                II or Class III railroad which made the assignment of 
                such track).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-04-536-CR

RAFAEL ALVARO PRIETO	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motion for DNA testing.  In a single point, appellant contends that the trial court improperly considered his guilty plea in denying the motion.  We affirm.

	Appellant had been charged with forcing a boy to give him oral sex and to receive oral sex from appellant.  The trial court found, based on the evidence presented by the State, that semen was not present in the oral and peri-oral samples in the sexual assault kit but that “[t]he presumptive test for semen was positive in the Wood’s lamp sampled from the penis of the victim.”  The trial court concluded that DNA testing of the samples would not exonerate appellant because there was no semen found in the sexual assault kit to test and because appellant’s penis did not contact the victim’s penis.  It also found that a lack of appellant’s DNA on the victim’s penis would not exonerate appellant because there is “no evidence that there would be DNA evidence after one performs oral sex on another.”  

	We hold that the trial court did not improperly consider appellant’s guilty plea.  The trial court concluded that appellant did not present evidence showing “a reasonable probability that he would not have been convicted had DNA testing been done.”  See Act of April 3, 2001, 77th Leg., R.S., ch. 2, § 2, 2001 Tex. Gen. Laws 2, 3 (amended 2003) (current version at Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.03(a)(2)(A) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05)).  The trial court correctly concluded that the absence of appellant’s DNA in any of the testable material would not exonerate appellant.  See Rivera v. State, 89 S.W.3d 55, 59-60 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85, 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).  Thus, we overrule appellant’s sole point and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

							TERRIE LIVINGSTON

							JUSTICE

PANEL A:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  May 19, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**JEMILL BANTUM,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL., PHELAN HALLINAN, DIAMOND &**  **JONES,**

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 71 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Application for Ext raordinary and/or** 

**King’s Bench Jurisdiction is** DENIED

**.**
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 15, 2014

No. 04-14-00078-CV

RIVER CITY CARE CENTER, INC. d/b/a River City Care Center,

Appellant

v.

Betty TAYLOR,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-15814

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due to be filed in this appeal on March 7, 2014. The court 

reporter responsible for preparing the record, Ms. Judith A. Stewart, was previously granted an 

additional thirty day extension to file the record, extending the deadline for filing the record to 

April 7, 2014. The record has not been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that Ms. Stewart file the 

record in this court no later than May 7, 2014. If the record is not received by such date, an order 

may be issued directing Ms. Stewart to appear and show cause why she should not be held in 

contempt for failing to file the record. The clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to 

be served on Ms. Judith A. Stewart by certified mail, return receipt requested, or give other

personal notice of this order with proof of delivery. Because “[t]he trial and appellate courts are 

jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed,” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c), 

the clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Honorable Barbara Hanson 

Nellermoe, Judge of the 37th Judicial District Court.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of April, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Howard R. HUGHES, Hughes Tool Company, and Raymond M. Holliday, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Dec. 5, 1961.

*524Cahill, Gordon, Reindel & Ohl, New York City, for plaintiff; John F. Sonnett, Paul W. Williams, Marshall H. Cox, Jr., Frederick P. Furth, and Cory don B. Dunham, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

Chester C. Davis, New York City, for defendant Hughes Tool Co.; Paul, Weiss, Rif kind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, of counsel.

METZNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. P. 34, 28 U.S.C.A. for the production and inspection of certain documents. Dispute exists as to the time when the documents shall be produced and as to three categories of requested documents. The first category refers to loans (item 1(e)). The second category refers to balance sheets and profit and loss statements for the years 1939 through 1960 (item V (a)). The third category refers to federal income tax returns for the years 1939 to date (item V(b)).

The order of priority of deposition proceedings has already been set. Consequently, while a motion pursuant to Rule 34 may be made at any time, it does not follow that the order granting such a motion should vary previously established schedules under Rule 26. Holt v. The James Sheridan, 12 F.R.D. 72 (S.D.N.Y.1951); Technical Tape Corp. v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co., 18 F.R.D. 318 (S.D.N.Y.1955). The documents should be produced prior to the dates scheduled for the taking of the depositions noticed by plaintiff.

 The complaint states claims of conspiracy in violation of the antitrust statutes. The scope of proof is quite broad in these cases and under the liberal federal rules wide latitude is permitted in the deposition-discovery proceedings. Rule 34 must be read in conjunction with Rule 26, which permits testimony which is “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” The financial data sought by this motion come within the “rule of relevancy” as applied to the allegations of the complaint. Income tax returns are not protected by privilege. Konczakowski v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 19 F.R.D. 361 (S.D.N.Y. 1956).

Defendant may request relief pursuant to Rule 30(b) upon the settlement of the order to be entered hereon.

Motion granted. Settle order.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Date:                November 8,                2007                                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                             |
|                                                                                                             |
| /s/                Robert                Putnam                                                        |
| Robert                  Putnam,                                                                                  |
| Interim                  Chief Accounting Officer(Principal                  Financial                  Officer) |

| Date:                November 8,                2007                                                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                    |
|                                                                                                                    |
| /s/                William                Blakeley                                                                 |
| William                  Blakeley,                                                                                      |
| President                  and                  Chief Technical Officer, (Principal                  Executive Officer) |

----
# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TMP Inland Empire II, Ltd.
(the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), we, Daniel L. Stephenson and John Fonseca of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 18(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

`Daniel L. Stephenson
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     November 12, 2002

                                                    /S/DANIEL L STEPHENSON
                                                    --------------------------



                                                     John Fonseca
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     November 12, 2002

                                                     /S/JOHN FONSECA
                                                     ---------------------------`
Summary of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.1 
 BJ’s Restaurants, Inc. Summary of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
 (As of March 1, 2009)

 Each non-employee director receives a quarterly retainer of $7,500 and reimbursement for travel expenses. In addition, the chairmen of each of the
Governance and Nominating Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Audit Committee will receive an additional quarterly retainer of $1,250. Effective in 2008, the Lead Independent Director will be entitled to receive an additional fee of
$7,500 per year, payable quarterly. 
 In addition, non-employee directors will be entitled to annual equity grants having a value of $40,000 (determined, in
the case of options, under the Black Scholes model). Newly appointed non-employee Directors will continue to receive initial options to acquire 25,000 shares of common stock at a price equal to the fair market value as of the date of the grant.
Exhibit 32

                        GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Global  Entertainment
Corporation  (the  Company) for the fiscal  quarter  ending  August 31, 2008, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
Quarterly  Report),  the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company each hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
          13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Dated October 15, 2008


/s/  Richard Kozuback
-----------------------------------------------
Richard Kozbuack
President & Chief Executive Officer



/s/  James Yeager
-----------------------------------------------
James Yeager
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>  1
                           WYMAN-GORDON COMPANY
                           FISCAL 1997 FORM 10-K


EXHIBIT 21


                   WYMAN-GORDON COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES



     The following is a list of Wyman-Gordon's subsidiaries as of
May 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               PLACE OF
                                               INCORPORATION
       NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                      OR ORGANIZATION
<S>                                            <C>
Cameron Forged Products Limited                United Kingdom

Cameron Pipeline, Inc.                         Texas

ForCast FSC, Ltd.                              Virgin Islands

Precision Founders, Inc.                       California

Reisner Metals, Inc.                           California

Scaled Composites, Inc.                        California

Scaled Manufacturing, Inc.                     Delaware

Wyman-Gordon Composites, Inc.                  Delaware

Wyman-Gordon Composite Technologies, Inc.      California

Wyman-Gordon Forgings, Inc.                    Delaware

Wyman-Gordon Investment Castings, Inc.         Delaware

Wyman-Gordon Limited                           United Kingdom/
                                               Delaware

Wyman-Gordon Receivables Corporation           Delaware

</TABLE>












                                    E-1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1):*                         August 23, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 18, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 342 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2017-176, CP2017-277.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2017-17874 Filed 8-22-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

## Agenda

# Time and Date:

 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, September 12, 2017.

# Place:

 NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# Status:

 The one item is open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

56955 Highway Accident Report: Collision Between a Car Operating With Automated Vehicle Control Systems and a Tractor-Semitrailer Truck, Near Williston, Florida, May 7, 2016

# News Media Contact:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

The press and public may enter the NTSB Conference Center one hour prior to the meeting for set up and seating.

                        Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Rochelle McCallister at (202) 314-6305 or by email at                         *Rochelle.McCallister@ntsb.gov*                         by Wednesday, September 6, 2017.                    

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived Web cast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

                        Schedule updates, including weather-related cancellations, are also available at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

# For More Information Contact:

                         Candi Bing at (202) 314-6403 or by email at                         *bingc@ntsb.gov.*

# For Media Information Contact:

                         Peter Knudson at (202) 314-6100 or by email at                         *peter.knudson@ntsb.gov.*

Dated: Thursday, August 17, 2017.

Candi R. Bing,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-17803 Filed 8-18-17; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7533-01-P