alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 704 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 8 

To provide for the approval of the Agreement for Cooperation Between the 

Government of the United States of America and the Government of 

the Kingdom of Norway Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 1, 2016 

Mr. CORKER (for himself and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

DECEMBER 7, 2016 

Reported by Mr. CORKER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To provide for the approval of the Agreement for Cooperation 

Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Norway 

Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 8 RS

1 SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION 

2 BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE 

3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOV4 ERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 

5 CONCERNING PEACEFUL USES OF NUCLEAR 

6 ENERGY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the provisions 

8 for congressional consideration of a proposed agreement 

9 for cooperation in subsection d. of section 123 of the 

10 Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), the Agree11 ment for Cooperation Between the Government of the 

12 United States of America and the Government of the 

13 Kingdom of Norway Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear 

14 Energy, done at Washington June 11, 2016, may be 

15 brought into effect on or after the date of the enactment 

16 of this Act, as if all the requirements in such section for 

17 consideration of such agreement had been satisfied, sub18 ject to subsection (b). 

19 (b) APPLICABILITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF

20 1954 AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW.—Upon entering 

21 into effect, the agreement referred to in subsection (a) 

22 shall be subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy 

23 Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) and any other appli24 cable United States law as if such agreement had come 

25 into effect in accordance with the requirements of section 

26 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153). 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 704 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 8 

A BILL 

To provide for the approval of the Agreement for 

Uses of Nuclear Energy. the Kingdom of Norway Concerning Peaceful United States of America and the Government of Cooperation Between the Government of the 

DECEMBER 7, 2016 

Reported without amendment 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): September 6, 
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 30, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 346 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017-181, CP2017-282.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-18771 Filed 9-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.0

Computation of Earnings per Share

The following represents the computation of earnings per share reflecting the
assumption that the granted shares under the option and warrants plan which
would be dilutive will be exercised.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three Months Ended
                                                                   March 31,
                                                           --------------------------
                                                              2005           2004
<S>                                                        <C>            <C>
Net earnings applicable to common shareholders - basic     $   627,934    $   336,707

Add:  Dividend to preferred shareholders                        21,600         15,000
                                                           -----------    -----------
Net earnings - diluted                                     $   649,534    $   351,707
                                                           ===========    ===========

Weighted average common shares outstanding                  12,619,603     12,409,619

Common share equivalents relating to stock
options, warrants and preferred stock                        3,994,919      3,629,294
                                                           -----------    -----------

Adjusted common and common equivalent shares for
diluted computation                                         16,614,522     16,038,913
                                                           ===========    ===========
Net earnings per share:
    Basic                                                  $      0.05    $      0.03
    Diluted                                                $      0.04    $      0.02

Anti-dilutive options, warrants and preferred stock not
included in the diluted earnings per share computations        277,500        365,100
                                                           ===========    ===========
</TABLE>

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
#### The Alert.*

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

February 10, 1883.)

Costs—Docket Fee—“Final Hearing” under Rev. St. $ 824.

Where a vessel was in custody of the court under process issued against her, and the case was entered in the admiralty docket, a consent was given that the case be discontinued on payment of the amount claimed and libelant’s costs. *Held,*that the granting of a motion for an order discharging the vessel from custody and canceling stipulations, was a final hearing under Rev. St. $ 824, and the libelant was entitled to a docket fee of $20.

In Admiralty.

*Goodrich, Deacly é Platt,*for libelant.

*L. B. Bunnell,*for claimant.

*

 Reported by R. D. & Wyllys Benedict.

Benedict, J.

This was a proceeding *in rem.*The libel was filed, process issued, the vessel taken into custody, and the case entered in the admiralty docket. Subsequently, an order dismissing the case and discharging the vessel from custody on payment of costs, founded upon a consent of the libelant that the cause be discontinued on payment of the amount claimed and the libelant’s costs, was applied for and obtained.

The costs are presented for taxation, and the question is raised whether the libelant can tax a docket fee of $20. The fee-bill allows on a final hearing in admiralty a docket fee of $20, where the amount recovered is over $50. Bev. St. § 82é. A distinction is drawn by the statute between admiralty causes and cases at law. In the latter cash a docket fee of five dollars only is allowed where the case is discontinued. A docket fee of $20 is allowed in all admiralty cases where there is a final hearing. In *Hayford*v. *Griffith, 3*Blatchf. 79, it was held by the circuit court that a dismissal of a cause upon the calendar, upon a motion before hearing, for an omission to file security for costs, was a final hearing within the meaning of the statute. The ground of this decision would seem to be that granting an order which disposed of the cause was a final hearing.

In accordance with this decision, the practice of this district has been to allow a docket fee in admiralty causes *in rem,*like the present. In this case the court has possession of the vessel. An order of court is necessary to obtain her release and to effect the cancellation of the libelant’s stipulations. A discharge of the vessel does not follow of course. It may be that the pendency of other proceedings *621against the samo vessel will prevent a release of the vessel upon such a motion. Such a motion, when granted, terminates the cause, so far as the vessel is concerned, and the hearing thereon is deemed a final hearing within the principle of the case of *Hayford*v. *Griffith,*above referred to.

The clerk’s taxation of a docket fee of $20 is affirmed.

See *Coy*v. Perkins, 13 Fed. Rep. 111, and note; also *Yale Lock, Manuf’g Co.*v. *Colvin,*14 Fed. Rep. 269.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

STEVEN BURDA, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

ALLA KORENMAN, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 154 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 719 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 719

To rename the Armed Forces Reserve Center in Great Falls, Montana, the 
   Captain John E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces 
                            Reserve Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2015

Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Daines) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To rename the Armed Forces Reserve Center in Great Falls, Montana, the 
   Captain John E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces 
                            Reserve Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENAMING OF THE ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER IN GREAT FALLS, 
              MONTANA, AS THE CAPTAIN JOHN E. MORAN AND CAPTAIN WILLIAM 
              WYLIE GALT ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER.

    (a) Renaming.--The Armed Forces Reserve Center in Great Falls, 
Montana, shall hereafter be known and designated as the ``Captain John 
E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces Reserve Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, map, regulation, map, 
document, paper, other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
the Captain John E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces 
Reserve Center.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35.4



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                               |  |  |  | 
|---- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|LOGO |  |  |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 |  |  |  | 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013, by and among GS Mortgage
Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and Certificate Administrator, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor and U.S. Bank
National Association as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-GC10 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from February 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the period February 1, 2013 through December 31,
2013.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 7th day of March 2014.



|                         |  | 
|------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ Daniel Bober        
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
Elizabeth A. Young, CSR, RPR

Official Court Reporter P. O. Box 747 Belton, Texas 76513 254 933-5268

January 23, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle Clerk, Court of Appeals P. O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711-2547 tel 512 463-1733 fax 512 463-1685

In re: State vs Devin Dasean Simmons COA 03-14-00707-CR

TC # 71988

Attn: Chris Knowles

Dear Chris,

I am requesting an extension to complete this repor ter's record by February 9, 2015.

Sincerely,

/s/ Elizabeth A. Young

Elizabeth A. Young
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10506--NBRS Financial, Rising Sun, Maryland

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for NBRS Financial, Rising Sun, Maryland 
(``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its receivership for said 
institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of NBRS Financial on 
October 17, 2014. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been 
completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance 
with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to 
proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: August 22, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-18112 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Health Fitness
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2006 (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Wesley W. Winnekins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


/s/ Wesley W. Winnekins
----------------------------------------
Wesley W. Winnekins
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2006
Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  filing  of Tech  Electro  Industries,  Inc.  and
Subsidiaries  (the  "Company")  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB for the period
ending June 30, 2002 with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof (the "Report"),  I, Julie  Sansom-Reese,  Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to the 18 U.S.C.  (SS) 1350, as adopted pursuant to
(SS) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




/s/ Julie Sansom-Reese
----------------------
Julie Sansom-Reese
Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.1b
November 11, 1996


Private Shelf Agreement dated as of January 31, 1996 between Zero
Corporation (the "Company") and Electronic Solutions ("Electronic"), on the one
hand and The Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential") and each
Prudential Affiliate (as defined in the Agreement) which has become bound by
certain provisions of the Agreement

Pursuant to the request of the company and Electronic and paragraph 12C of
the Agreement, Prudential and Pruco Life Insurance Company ("Pruco") hereby
agree with the company and Electronic that the Agreement shall be amended as
follows:

      1.    Clause (ii) of paragraph 6C(3) is amended and restated in its
            entirety as follows:

         		"Purchased Common Stock and common stock of the Company repurchased
            by the Company,".

      2.    Clause (vii) of paragraph 6C(3) is amended and restated in its
            entirety as follows:

         		"so long as the aggregate amount thereof at no time exceeds
            $14,000,000, the book value of claims of the Company on the cash   
            value of life insurance policies owned by current and former
            members of the Company's management, the premiums on which have been
            advanced by the Company to such current and former management
            members,".

     In order to induce Prudential and Pruco to enter into this amendment, the
Company and Electronic hereby represent that (i) other than this amendment, the
parties have not entered into any amendment, waiver or mutual disregard of the
terms and conditions of the Agreement, or any course of dealing or variance with
the terms and provisions thereof, (ii) no consent, waiver, approval or amendment
relating to the subject matter hereof is necessary to avert a default or event
of default under any material agreement of the Company, and (iii) after giving
effect to this letter, no Default or Event of Default exists on the date hereof.

<PAGE>

     If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please execute the enclosed
counterpart of this letter in the spaces indicated below and return such
executed counterpart to James F. Evert, Prudential Capital Group, Four Em,
whereupon this letter shall become a binding agreement.

                                          Sincerely,


                                          THE PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 
                                              COMPANY OF AMERICA


                                          By:     /s/                    
                                          Its:  Vice President


                                          PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY


                                          By:    /s/                    
                                          Its:  Assistant Vice President
<PAGE>

Accepted and agreed to effective
the date first appearing above.

ZERO CORPORATION


By:      /s/ G. A. Daniels      
Its:  Vice President


ELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS

By:      /s/ G. A. Daniels      
Its:  Vice President
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 26, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00208

- CR

Jose Manuel ROMO

- MORAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 2181

- CV

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The record in this habeas corpus appeal has been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that

appellant’s brief is due on or before May 18, 2016. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 31.1; 4 th Tex. App. Loc.

R. 8.2. The State’s brief is due 20 days after the date appellant’s brief is filed. Id

. A reply brief,

if any, must be filed within 10 days after the State’s brief is filed. Id

.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of April, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I I

I

111

111

iij II

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

RANDY A. BROWN

NO. 2023 KW 0441

JULY 17, 2023

In Re: Randy A. Brown, applying for supervisory writs, 16th

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary, No. 

2020206243

BEFORE: THERIOT, WOLFE, AND GREENE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include

a complete copy of the motion for amendment of sentence, guilty

plea and sentencing transcript( s), bill of information, uniform

commitment order, pertinent district court minutes, and any

other portion of the district court record that might support

the claims raised in the writ application. Therefore, this court

cannot adequately review the ruling at issue herein. 

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application

for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of

Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event

relator elects to file a new application with this court, he may

do so without the necessity of obtaining a return date. Any

future filing on this issue should include the entire contents

of this application, the missing items noted above, and a

copy

of this ruling. 

MRT

EW

HG

URT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT