alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2013-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
  
 
  
 /s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL
Exhibit 32.1


   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                                      2002

         In connection with the filing of Zunicom, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company")  Amendment  to the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-Q/A  for the period
ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),I, William Tan, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. (SS) 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that:

                (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                   section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;
                   and

                 (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                    in all material respects, the financial condition and
                    results of operations of the Company,


/s/ William Tan
--------------------
William Tan
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)

August 19, 2004


























                                     32.1-1
Exhibit 33.2b

|                |                        |                                
|--------------- | ---------------------- | -------------------------------
|[Assurant Logo] |                        | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE
|                | Atlanta, GA 30329-2210
|                | T 770.763.1000        
|                | F 770.859.4403        
|                | www.assurant.com      
|                | February 15, 2017     

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

§1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)

of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD

JANUARY 1, 2016 TO DECEMBER 31, 2016

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the Asserting Party)
is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and
§1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs
with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform Transactions). The Asserting
Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period.

American Security Insurance Company

Standard Guaranty Insurance Company

TrackSure
Insurance Agency, Inc.



|                                                                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John Frobose                                                                                                                                    
|By: John Frobose                                                                                                                                    
|President of American Security Insurance Company and Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and Sr. Vice President of TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.

Date: February 15, 2017
<PAGE>   1
                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                                   FORM 10-Q/A

(mark one)
[ X ]    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998

                                       OR

[   ]    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________ TO __________

                         COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-20096

                                  GLIATECH INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


               DELAWARE                                 34-1587242
   (State or other jurisdiction of          (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   incorporation or organization)

        23420 COMMERCE PARK ROAD                           44122
             CLEVELAND, OHIO                             (Zip Code)
 (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (216) 831-3200
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registration (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                               YES  X   NO
                                   ---     ---

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock, $0.01 par
value per share, as of August 7, 1998 was 9,352,348 shares.



<PAGE>   2



                                  SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused the Amendment No. 1 to this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Date: November 13, 1998


                                        GLIATECH INC.

                                        By:  /s/ Rodney E. Dausch
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Rodney E. Dausch,
                                            Vice President, Chief Financial
                                              Officer and Secretary
                                            (Duly Authorized Officer
                                            and Principal Financial and
                                            Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 757 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 757

  To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of 
 certain rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial 
                                 names.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2015

 Mr. Nelson (for himself and Mr. Burr) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of 
 certain rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial 
                                 names.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Stolen Trademarks Honored in 
America Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION.

    Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in section 101(b) of division A 
of Public Law 105-277; 112 Stat. 2681-88) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``by a designated national''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the period ``that was used 
                in connection with a business or assets that were 
                confiscated unless the original owner of the mark, 
                trade name, or commercial name, or the bonafide 
                successor-in-interest has expressly consented'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``by a designated 
        national or its successor-in-interest'';
            (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e);
            (4) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall apply only 
if the person or entity asserting the rights knew or had reason to know 
at the time when the person or entity acquired the rights asserted that 
the mark, trade name, or commercial name was the same as or 
substantially similar to a mark, trade name, or commercial name that 
was used in connection with a business or assets that were 
confiscated.''; and
            (5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking ``In 
        this section:'' and all that follows through ``(2) The term'' 
        and inserting ``In this section, the term''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Gerald L. BRUMLEY, Appellant, v. GARLAND COUNTY; Larry Williams, Individually, Appellees.

No. 07-2215.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 6, 2008.

Filed: Feb. 7, 2008.

Gerald L. Brumley, Hot Springs, AR, pro se.

*732Ralph Charles Ohm, Hot Springs, AR, for Appellees.

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Gerald Brumley appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of the maintenance by Garland County, Arkansas, of a road fronting his property. Upon de novo review, *see Turner v. Honeywell Fed. Mfg. & Tech.,*336 F.3d 716, 719-20 (8th Cir.2003), we conclude that the district court properly determined that Brumley’s failure to pursue his state-court remedies was fatal to his federal claims, *see Cormack v. SettleBeshears,*474 F.3d 528, 531 (8th Cir.2007) (federal courts are barred from considering merits of takings claim until private litigant exhausts state remedies unless state’s remedies are inadequate or unavailable; Arkansas’ inverse condemnation procedure provides adequate mechanisms for its citizens to be justly compensated for takings), and Brumley failed to establish a basis for holding the defendants liable, *see Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown,*520 U.S. 397, 403-04, 117 S.Ct. 1382, 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (plaintiff seeking to impose § 1983 liability on municipality must identify municipal policy or custom that caused his injury).

To the extent that Brumley raised state-law claims, we modify the dismissal of any such claims to be without prejudice. *See Labickas v. Ark. State Univ.,*78 F.3d 333, 334-35 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam) (following dismissal of federal claims, district court has discretion to dismiss state law claims, but dismissal should be without prejudice). As modified, the judgment is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GLIATECH
INC'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,951
<SECURITIES>                                     6,018
<RECEIVABLES>                                      375
<ALLOWANCES>                                        16
<INVENTORY>                                        377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,706
<PP&E>                                           2,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,788
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            73
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,870
<SALES>                                            344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,133
<CGS>                                              125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,980
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,744)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)
        

</TABLE>
#### Sam E. SCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-60573

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 23, 2008.

Sam E. Scott, pro se.

Robert R. Di Trolio, U.S. Tax Court, Donald L. Korb, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Petitioner-Appellant Sam E. Scott has managed to stall, delay, avoid, and otherwise keep from paying his 1991 income tax deficiency that was determined on its merits by the United States Tax Court in June, 1998 and affirmed by this court in June, 1999.1 Scott is again before us on appeal from the United States Tax Court, this time seeking reversal of that Court’s Memorandum Opinion filed April 17, 2007, 2007 WL 1135340, holding that the Commissioner’s pursuit of collection by filing notices of federal tax liens was not an abuse of discretion. We affirm.

*598We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law; and our review satisfies us completely that the United States Tax Court correctly determined that the Commissioner did not abuse his discretion in any way, shape, or form in endeavoring to collect taxes, interest, etc. previously determined to be due and owing by Scott. Specifically, the Commissioner did not abuse his discretion in the filing of the above-said notices of federal tax liens. For essentially the reasons set forth in the aforesaid Memorandum Opinion, the judgment appealed from is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. *See Scott v. Commissioner,*182 F.3d 915 (5th Cir. 1999).
Mary Scopas 207th Judicial District Court Reporter Serving Comal , Hays and Caldwell Counties

( 512 ) 757 - 0387 Scopam@co . comal . tx . us November 21 , 2016 Third Court of Appeals Re : Cause No . CR- 14 - 0271 , State of Texas v . Clifton Hennington , In the 207th Judicial District Court , Hays County , Texas . To Whom it May Concern : I am respectfully requesting an additional 30 days to produce the appellate record in the above - referenced case .

Very Truly Yours ,



### \**s \**  **Mary Scopas**  Mary Scopas , CSR , RPR CSR #5313 - Expiration Date : 12 / 31 / 16 RPR #812407 - Expiration Date : 09 / 30 / 19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                      393,625
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            393,625
<PP&E>                                    1,029,217
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,426,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,352
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     13,879
<OTHER-SE>                                1,968,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,426,086
<SALES>                                       1,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,202
<CGS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             26,897
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                26,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (25,695)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7530

EMRICH C. KENNY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS; PAUL BASS, Acting Warden; A. M.

PARKER, Major; CRISSY CREATH, LPN; FELECIA

FLEMING, LPN; JOHN DOE HYMAN, LPN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-97-30-3)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 4, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emrich C. Kenny, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Kenny

v. Virginia, No. CA-97-30-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED