alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Elvis David LEWIS, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-1328.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 15, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 29, 2008.

Randall L. Johnson, Johnson & Associates, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Russell Verby, Senior Litigation *545Counsel, Robbin K. Blaya, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition dismissed in part; denied in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elvis David Lewis, a native and citizen of Grenada, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing Lewis’s appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying relief from removal. Lewis first challenges the finding that he is removable for falsely claiming United States citizenship, and asserts that the Board erred in finding that he never contested this ground of removability on appeal. Our review discloses that Lewis in fact failed to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to this claim by raising it on appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. As such, we lack jurisdiction to review this unexhausted claim. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2000). Next, Lewis asserts that his right to due process was violated when the Immigration Judge precluded the presentation of evidence of rehabilitation at the 2005 hearings concerning Lewis’s attempt to adjust his status. We find that Lewis cannot succeed with this due process claim because he fails to show the requisite prejudice resulting from the alleged error. See *Rusu v. INS,*296 F.3d 316, 320-21 (4th Cir.2002).

Accordingly, we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We deny Lewis’s motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to remand. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DISMISSED IN PART; DENIED IN PART*
Exhibit 32

                        GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Global  Entertainment
Corporation  (the Company) for the fiscal quarter  ending  November 30, 2008, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
Quarterly  Report),  the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company each hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
          13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Dated January 14, 2009


/s/ Richard Kozuback
-----------------------------------------------
Richard Kozbuack
President & Chief Executive Officer


/s/ James Yeager
-----------------------------------------------
James Yeager
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Walter Lee Roberts v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00059

- CR

Trial court case number: 2013442

Trial court: Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No

. 4 of Harris County

Appellant, Walter Lee Roberts

, has filed a motion asking this Court to withdraw its mandate and stay the issuance of the mandate. Appellant cites rule 18.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for authority for the request ed actions. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 18.2. Rule 18.2 allows this Court to stay the issuance of a mandate prior to its issuance. Id. Here, however, the mandate has already issued. Rule 18.7 allows a Court to withdraw its mandate when it is necessary to vacate

or mod ify a judgment. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 18.7. But Appellant has not urged, nor has this Court found,

any authority to vacate or modify the judgment. We are authorized to withdraw our mandate after plenary power has expired only as the Rules of Appellate Procedure provide. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 19.3(b). Because we find no authority in the rules to provide Appellant with the relief he requests, we cannot grant the motion. See id. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

Acting individually

Date: June 8 , 2017
> 
EXHIBIT 23

 

 

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent tothe incorporation of our reports included in this Form 10-K into WPS ResourcesCorporation's previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 33-47172, 33-61991,33-65167, 333-63101, 333-88525, 333-93193, and 333-44738 and Wisconsin Public Service Corporation's previously filed RegistrationStatement File Nos. 33-35050 and 333-67979.

 

> 
/S/ Arthur Andersen LLP

 

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

 

Milwaukee, WisconsinFebruary 26, 2001
#### Sean MAHER, Tanya Greene, et al., Plaintiffs, Katharine Kennedy, Daniel Waggoner, Anne Keating, Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Appellees, v. AVONDALE ESTATES, Georgia, a municipal corporation, John Parker, in his official capacity as City manager and Police Chief of Avondale Estates, Lyda Steadman, in her official capacity as City Clerk-Treasurer of Avondale Estates, Craig A. Mims, in his official capacity as Code Enforcement Officer of Avondale Estates, Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants.

No. 07-11702

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 23, 2008.

Neil Bradley, ACLU Foundation, Inc., Atlanta, GA, for Katharine Kennedy, Daniel Waggoner and Anne Keating.

Gerald R. Weber, Margaret Fletcher Garrett, ACLU of Georgia, Atlanta, GA, for Anne Keating.

Richard A. Carothers, Carothers & Mitchell, LLC, Buford, GA, for City of Avondale Estates, GA, John Parker, Lyda Steadman, and Craig Mims.

Amy Bryant Cowan, Carothers & Mitchell, LLC, Buford, GA, for Craig Mims.

Before HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and MOORE *, District Judge.

*

 Honorable K. Michael Moore, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that the parties have not shown any reversible error in the district court’s orders dated March 29, 2006 and March 15, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms those orders.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RIVERWOOD HOLDING INC. FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000886239
<NAME> RIVERWOOD HOLDING INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,791
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,294
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,214
<INVENTORY>                                    177,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               340,654
<PP&E>                                       1,478,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                 337,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,405,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          251,169
<BONDS>                                      1,726,034
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                     309,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,405,053
<SALES>                                        255,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,867
<CGS>                                          207,759
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,237
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    43
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (24,086)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       409
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (26,479)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26,479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.7



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                       
|---- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services MAC
R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045
 Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich Street, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10013

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator for the National Harbor Companion Loan (in such
capacities, Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the reporting period):



| | (a) | A review of Wells Fargos activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the Servicing Agreement(s)) has been made
under my supervision; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule
B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               
|---------------
|March 26, 2015 
|               
|\s\ Brian Smith
|Brian Smith    
|Vice President 



---

To: Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

Schedule A

List of
Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013 by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION
II, Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC., Operating Advisor WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Certificate Administrator and U.S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Trustee relating to the series, GSMC 2013-GC10 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction , relating to the National Harbor Companion Loan, a Pari passu portion of which is included in the Series CGCMT 2013-GCJ11
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.



---

To: Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

Schedule B

Material
Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

Not Applicable
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

y1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143479 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143479 

 COA: 300197 

Wayne CC: 06-002740-01 

STEVEN CURTIS LONG, 06-002741-01 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the use, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2013 of Straight Path Communications Inc. (the “Company”), of our report dated October 29, 2013 on our audits of the combined and consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of July 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended July 31, 2013, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/  Zwick & Banyai, PLLC





Zwick & Banyai, PLLC


Southfield, Michigan





October 29, 2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0247 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROBERT MATHEW HOLGUIN, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until October 30, 2020 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 23 2020

09/23/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0247
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 989 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to exempt 

from duty residue of bulk cargo contained in instruments of international 

traffic previously exported from the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 16, 2015 

Mr. COATS (for himself and Ms. HEITKAMP) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States to exempt from duty residue of bulk cargo contained in instruments of international traffic previously 

exported from the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Residue Entries and 

5 Streamlining Trade Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 989 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM DUTY OF RESIDUE OF BULK 

2 CARGO CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENTS OF 

3 INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC PREVIOUSLY EX4 PORTED FROM THE UNITED STATES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—General Note 3(e) of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (v), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

9 the end; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (vi), by adding ‘‘and’’ at 

11 the end; 

12 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (vi) (as so 

13 amended) the following new subparagraph: 

14 ‘‘(vii) residue of bulk cargo contained in 

15 instruments of international traffic previously 

16 exported from the United States,’’; and 

17 (4) by adding at the end of the flush text fol18 lowing subparagraph (vii) (as so added) the fol19 lowing: ‘‘For purposes of subparagraph (vii) of this 

20 paragraph: The term ‘residue’ means material of 

21 bulk cargo that remains in an instrument of inter22 national traffic after the bulk cargo is removed, with 

23 a quantity, by weight or volume, not exceeding 7 

24 percent of the bulk cargo, and with no or de minimis 

25 value. The term ‘bulk cargo’ means cargo that is 

26 unpackaged and is in either solid, liquid, or gaseous 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 989 IS

1 form. The term ‘instruments of international traffic’ 

2 means containers or holders, capable of and suitable 

3 for repeated use, such as lift vans, cargo vans, ship4 ping tanks, skids, pallets, caul boards, and cores for 

5 textile fabrics, arriving (whether loaded or empty) in 

6 use or to be used in the shipment of merchandise in 

7 international traffic, and any additional articles or 

8 classes of articles that the Commissioner of U.S. 

9 Customs and Border Protection designates as in10 struments of international traffic.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 subsection (a) take effect on the date of the enactment 

13 of this Act and apply with respect to residue of bulk cargo 

14 contained in instruments of international traffic that are 

15 imported into the customs territory of the United States 

16 on or after such date of enactment and that previously 

17 have been exported from the United States. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the
Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Form 10-Q.
 Dated: May 13, 2009
    /s/ Laurence P. BirchLaurence P. BirchChief Executive Officer 25
Summary of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.56 
 Summary of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
 As of December 31, 2008, PC Connection, Inc.’s
(the “Company’s”) non-employee directors consisted of: (i) Bruce Barone; (ii) Joseph Baute; and (iii) Donald Weatherson. Effective June 1, 2008, each non-employee director received a standard quarterly retainer fee
of $10,000 for service on the Board as well as $2,500 for each individual board meeting attended. Previously, each non-employee director was paid $9,000 per quarter and $1,500 for each board meeting attended. Non-employee directors continued in 2008
to receive $1,500 for each committee meeting attended. The table below sets forth the total retainer fee paid in 2008, per board meeting fees from June 1, 2008, and per committee meeting fees paid to our non-employee directors in 2008:

  

							
	 Director
	  	Total Retainer Fee
Paid in 2008(1)	  	Fee Per Board
Meeting Attended	  	Fee Per Committee
Meeting Attended
	 Bruce Barone
	  	$38,000	  	$2,500	  	$1,500
	 Joseph Baute
	  	$38,000	  	$2,500	  	$1,500
	 Donald Weatherson
	  	$38,000	  	$2,500	  	$1,500

  

	 	(1)	In addition, the non-employee directors receive reimbursement for all reasonable expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation for the
six months ended April 3, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000886903
<NAME> KRONOS, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                          17,481
<SECURITIES>                                    21,817
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,535
<INVENTORY>                                      3,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,316
<PP&E>                                          50,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,429
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           126
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,570
<SALES>                                         73,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,801
<CGS>                                           17,313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   346
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,958
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,197
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,761
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,761
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.60
        

</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 422 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to clarify the use of credentials 

by enrolled agents. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2015 

Mr. PORTMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to clarify the use 

of credentials by enrolled agents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ENROLLED AGENT CRE4 DENTIALS. 

5 Section 330 of title 31, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and 

8 (d) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively, and 

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol10 lowing new subsection: 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 422 IS

1 ‘‘(b) Any enrolled agents properly licensed to practice 

2 as required under rules promulgated under subsection (a) 

3 shall be allowed to use the credentials or designation of 

4 ‘enrolled agent’, ‘EA’, or ‘E.A.’.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS