alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 23 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 

relating to ‘‘Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric 

Utility Generating Units’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2015 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself, Mr. MANCHIN, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

BLUNT, Mr. LEE, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. HOEVEN, 

Mr. WICKER, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. SULLIVAN, 

Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. THUNE, Mrs. FISCHER, 

Mr. RUBIO, Mr. COATS, Mr. COTTON, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. RISCH, Mr. 

VITTER, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. MORAN, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. 

CORNYN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. ENZI, Mr. PERDUE, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. PAUL, Mrs. ERNST, Mr. HATCH, Mr. DAINES, 

Mr. SASSE, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. 

GRAHAM, and Mr. CORKER) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of a rule submitted by the 

Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Standards 

of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from 

New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: 

Electric Utility Generating Units’’. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 23 IS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Standards of 

5 Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, 

6 Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric 

7 Utility Generating Units’’ (published at 80 Fed. Reg. 

8 64510 (October 23, 2015)), and such rule shall have no 

9 force or effect. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 99-60527

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-60527

Summary Calendar

 

SAJJAD HAIDER RIZVI;

IQRAR HAIDER RIZVI; 

NABIHA HAIDER RIZVI;

MUBASHIRA SAJJAD RIZVI,

Petitioners,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA Nos. 

A29-924-885

A71-509-654

A71-509-655

A71-509-656

- - - - - - - - - -

May 3, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ decision dismissing the appeal from the immigration

judge’s decision to deny an application for asylum. We have

reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the 

decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence. See

Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The
No. 99-60527

-2-

petition for review is DENIED.
#### June R. FLYNN and Earl Flynn, Plaintiffs, v. Calvin J. WILLIAMS, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 7212.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

Sept. 16, 1958.

Jerome Caplan, of Rogin, Nassau & Caplan, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiffs.

James Healey, of Gordon, Muir & Fitzgerald, Hartford, Conn., for defendant.

J. JOSEPH SMITH, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in an automobile negligence personal injury action move for production of a liability insurance policy and endorsements thereon. They stress the practical utility, in evaluating the claim, of knowledge of limits and risks covered. There is much force in the practical argument, but the information sought is beyond the scope of discovery under the rule, for it is not relevant to any present issue in the action between plaintiffs and *67this defendant, nor can it conceivably lead to discovery of evidence on any present issue. Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S. C.A. Gallimore v. Dye, E.D.Ill., 21 F.R.D. 283; McClure v. Boeger, E.D.Pa., 105 F.Supp. 612; McNelley v. Perry, E.D.Tenn.N.Div., 18 F.R.D. 360. See contra Orgel v. McCurdy, S.D.N.Y., 8 F.R.D. 585, Brackett v. Woodall Food Products, E.D.Tenn.S.Div., 12 F.R.D. 4.

Of course, issues may be raised on supplementary proceedings after verdict to which the information might be relevant. The motion to produce is denied without prejudice.
NUMBER 13

- 1 4

- 00 343

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

BELDON ROOFING COMPANY

, Appellant,

v.

SUNCHASE IV HOMEOWNERS’

ASSOCIATION, INC.

, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 197 th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.



### ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on Sunchase IV Homeowners Association, Inc.’s

motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and Beldon Roofing Company’s motion to stay

an arbitration set for August 11, 2014 before the Honorable Robert Garza. The Court

having fully considered the motions, the responses thereto, and the applicable law, is of2

the opinion that Sunchase’s motion to dismiss should be denied and that Beldon’s motion

to stay should be granted. Accordingly, Sunchase’s motion to dismiss is hereby DENIE D

and Beldon’s motion to stay is hereby GRANTED . The district court is ordered to stay

all proceedings, including the arbitration set for August 11, 2014, pending further order of

this Court or final disposition of this appeal.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

3 0 th day of Ju ly

, 2014

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                               209,648
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      4,058,644
<ALLOWANCES>                         261,071
<INVENTORY>                            2,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   4,325,362
<PP&E>                             1,582,289
<DEPRECIATION>                       882,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    12,071,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              8,075,773
<BONDS>                              687,979
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                             121,120
<OTHER-SE>                         3,186,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      12,071,440
<SALES>                           19,765,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  19,765,324
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     15,177,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   4,487,905
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   780,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,248,453)
<INCOME-TAX>                           6,413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,254,866)
<DISCONTINUED>                    (1,425,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                      (2,679,866)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.22)



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 26, 2012

s1217 

# Order

December 26, 2012

145710 & (30)

WILLIAM MOORE, JR.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 14 5710

COA: 308850

PUGSLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

WARDEN,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to add a par ty

is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Stepan 
Company

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 
1301.33(a) on or before November 6, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division 
(``Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, 
appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on 
January 20, 2017, Stepan Company, Natural Products Dept., 100 W. Hunter 
Avenue, Maywood, New Jersey 07607 applied to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Drug
          Controlled substance            code           Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cocaine................................    9041  II
Ecgonine...............................    9180  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution to its customers.

    Dated: August 28, 2017.
Demetra Ashley,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-18789 Filed 9-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                               134,590
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      3,021,201
<ALLOWANCES>                        (222,591)
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   3,211,710
<PP&E>                             1,484,719
<DEPRECIATION>                       978,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    10,330,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              6,343,400
<BONDS>                              347,245
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                             121,241
<OTHER-SE>                         3,518,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      10,330,838
<SALES>                            6,738,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   6,738,891
<CGS>                              4,944,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      4,944,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   1,228,032
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      34,679
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   164,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      422,787
<INCOME-TAX>                          (4,774)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  427,561
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         427,561
<EPS-BASIC>                            .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .03



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

           COMMERCE GROUP CORP. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
           --------------------------------------------------

             SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


                                           Years Ended March 31

                                      2006          2005          2004
                                  ------------  ------------  ------------
BASIC/DILUTED
-------------

Net income (loss) for primary
 income per common share          $  (162,085)  $  (229,936)  $  (237,790)
                                  ============  ============  ============

Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding
 during the year - basic/diluted    23,834,988    22,581,814    21,089,812
                                  ============  ============  ============
Income (loss) per common
 share - basic/diluted            $      (.01)  $      (.01)  $      (.01)
                                  ============  ============  ============
Exhibit 32.1


   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.
              SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of Zunicom, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company")  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),I,  William Tan,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C.
(SS) 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

                (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;
                    and

                (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                    in all material respects, the financial condition and
                    results of operations of the Company,


/s/ William Tan
--------------------
William Tan
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)

November 15, 2004


























                               Exhibit 32.1 - 1
confidential







ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that
certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 6, 2013, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor,
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, CITIBANK, N.A.,
as Certificate Administrator and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2013-375P (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned
in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 12.7 of
this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December
31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision,
and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations
under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.













Leslie Hayton

Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank















confidential
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 8 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 8

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor 
      Relations Board relating to representation case procedures.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Labor Relations Board relating to 
representation case procedures (published at 79 Fed. Reg. 74308 
(December 15, 2014)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate March 4, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. J. RES. 8

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor 
      Relations Board relating to representation case procedures.
```
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH

#### David M. Myers v. Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR.

September 3, 2002

Case No. L99-1444

By Judge Dean W. Sword, Jr.

The court has reviewed the respective authorities submitted by counsel with regard to the issue of the discovery of surveillance material.

After reviewing the several circuit court opinions, the court comes to the conclusion that the position adopted by Judge Johnson in the matter of *Lee*v. *Richmond F. & P. RR., 23*Va. Cir. 357 (1991), seems fair and meets what the court believes to be a modem approach to discovery.

For the reasons stated by Judge Johnson, we shall require any surveillance materials that may be presented at trial for whatever purpose to be made available for inspection by plaintiff’s counsel at least five days prior to trial. If the defense does not plan to use such materials, the plaintiff has no need to see them and they need not be produced.
#### William P. JONES v. COLDWAY RENTALS INC., and Coldway Food Express.

Civ. A. No. 29764.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Dec. 17, 1962.

Ernest Ray White, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

KRAFT, District Judge.

In this action for personal injuries the defendants moved for summary judgment. The motion was listed for argument on our regular list for September 21, 1962.

The plaintiff neither filed a brief nor served a copy thereof upon opposing counsel; nor did he appear at the time fixed for argument. No reason for these omissions has since been offered. Under Rule 33 of this Court failure in either of these respects “may be deemed a waiver of all objections to the application, for which the application may be granted.” See also our Rule 12, “Expedition of Court Business.” We deem plaintiff’s failures in these respects a waiver of all objections to defendants’ motion.

We will grant defendants’ motion without reluctance since it appears indisputable that plaintiff, at the time of the occurrence complained of, was an employe of defendant, Coldway Food Express, and was then and there engaged in the performance of his duties; that plaintiff’s remedies are limited by the provisions of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act; and that, in fact, plaintiff has received benefits under this Act.

Accordingly, we enter the following

ORDER

NOW, December 17th, 1962, it is ordered that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be, and it is, granted, and judgment is entered for the defendants.
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|    |  |                                                                                                                   
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|RE: |  | Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-6 Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-6

Per the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

February 24, 2015



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Kristen Cronin
|Kristen Cronin    
|Vice President    



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alfredo Garcia BECERRA, also known as Israel Becerril Garcia, also known as Alfredo Garcia-Becerra, also known as Alfredo Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-20622

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 30, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfredo Garcia Becerra raises arguments that are foreclosed by *AlmendarezTorres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.