alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DO NA L D J E F F E R Y, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. B E N N G E , M .T .A .; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 16965 D . C. N o . 1 : 0 6 - c v - 0 0 7 5 2 - G BC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G e r a l d B . C ohn, M a gi s tr a t e J udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ay 15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R an d M . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D ona l d J e f

f e ry , a n i nm a t e a tthe C a l i f orni aS ubs t a nc e A bus e T r e a tm e nt Fa c i l i ty , ap p e a l s p r o s e f r o m th e d i s tr i c tc o u rt ' s s u mma ry j u d g me n ti n h i s 4 2 U . S. C. § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng vi ol a t i ons of hi s c ons t i tut i ona l r i ght s i n c onne c t i on w i th a



# FI LED MA Y17 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2003 i nc i de nti n w hi c h pr i s on of f i c i a l s us e d e xc e s s i ve f

or c e a ga i ns thi m . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo, J one s v . B lanas , 393 F .3 d 9 1 8 , 9 2 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) , a n d w e v a c a te a n d r e m a n d . T he di stri ctcourtconcl ud ed thatJe ff ery’ s e xces si ve force cl ai m w as barr ed un der E dw ards v . B al is ok , 50 2 U . S . 64 1 6 48 (199 7), because he had fai l ed t o set f orth e vi de nc e de m ons tr a t i ng tha thi s rul e - vi ol a t i on c onvi c t i on, a r i s i ng f r om the sam e 200 3 i nci dent , had b ee n i nv al i dat ed. O n app ea l , appel l ee s a ckno w l edge that th e d i stri ctco u rterred i n g ran t i n g th ei r m o t i o n fo r su m m ary j u d g m en tb ecau se Jeffery’s rule violat i o n co n v i ct i o n h ad i n factb een i n v al i d at ed b efo re h e fi l ed h i s § 19 83 com pl ai nt . A pp el l ee s a ss ertthere fore thatthe E dw ards b a rd o e s n o t ap p ly and thatthi s c as e s ho ul d b e r em anded t o the di stri ctcourt . B ec ause i tappears that Je ff ery’ s rul e vi ol at i on conv i ct i on i n con nect i on w i th the 20 03 i nci denthas bee n i nva l i da t e d, w e va c a t e the gr a ntof s um m a ry j udgm e nti n f a vorof de f e nda nt s on Jeffery’s excessive fo rce cl ai m an d rem an d fo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. VA C A TED a nd R EM A N D ED .
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CEDRIC HUTCHINSON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-206

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 18, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Clark v. State, 783 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 2001); McDonald v. 

State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Hutchinson v. State, 129 So. 3d 368 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2013) (table decision); Doby v. State, 25 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Hughes 

v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Wingfield v. State, 

816 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Hutchinson v. State, 249 So. 3d 1327 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2018); Harris v. State, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
March 10, 2009


 


Mr. James K. Schwartz


Chairman of the Board, President,





	
             
 	
            Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
 





NPC International, Inc.


7300 West 129th Street


Overland Park, KS 66213


 


Dear Jim:


Your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with NPC International, Inc. (the "Company"), dated as of December 29, 2008 (the "New Employment Agreement"), became effective by its terms on January 1, 2009 and technically only has prospective application.  The New Employment Agreement amended the Employment Agreement with the Company originally entered into on May 3, 2006 (the "Original Employment Agreement").


By its terms, the Original Employment Agreement would, among other things, determine the calculation and timing of payment of your bonus compensation for your service to the Company in 2008.  However, it is your intention, and that of the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee acting on behalf of the Company, that the provisions set forth in Section 4.2 of the New Employment Agreement should instead govern the calculation, timing of payment and other matters addressed therein with respect to your bonus compensation for your service to the Company in 2008.  Accordingly, this letter will serve as confirmation of our agreement that your bonus compensation for your service to the Company in 2008 will be determined in accordance with Section 4.2 of the New Employment Agreement, notwithstanding the terms of the New Employment Agreement or the Original Employment Agreement.
 For purposes of all filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, this letter agreement will be referred to as "Amendment, dated as of March 10, 2009, to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2008, by and between NPC International, Inc., NPC Acquisition Holdings, LLC and James K. Schwartz."


Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing in the space indicated below and returning the same to me at your earliest convenience.


Very truly yours,


/s/ Troy D. Cook


Troy D. Cook


Executive Vice President - Finance


 


 





	
            /s/ James K. Schwartz
 	
             
 	
             
 
	
            James K. Schwartz
 	
             
 	
             
 
	
            Chairman of the Board, President,
 	
             
 	
             
 
	
            Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
SA’ID SHABAZZ,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3009

Opinion filed May 5, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari – Original Jurisdiction.

Don Pumphrey, Jr., and Nathan Robert Prince, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee; Ana Cristina Martinez, General 

Counsel and Christian D. Lake, Assistant General Counsel of The Justice 

Administrative Commission, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

ROWE, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
### J^a^Jth, CUuss ^/XSRJLUL -s52 J2AratzL£LsJ\ir\ K Q* ^ J&JXxitACQa , Td *7 76"g"^ 

## RECEIVER. fsJkcuxxzi. /1, 'X0\^ 

## """"ctmi^. F£B 25 20)5 Lourr n+ Lclca.La.ci A-fLp&sdl ^foe^gggjw-pj—jy.a. g,t /a^ofr 

### Au^oJ T/. "7? 11 I $K: 7 D-Q53 S~-1W A /a ^ u. SA.A Co A //„ 0%/3-ooat<f-ce
-Ppy-r- £L/irlL 

### "^ btby.l- re.C,e,ltS<Le4 ,O.0_tLCA V^sdt. on FthrUtH^y cfi Hdl^ 7\s C^l-,*-*- Afl( reluXtJ Ln-k^ ne.jih^S -hr-dm UJ SXv/f &f\mJL AlLpeJJji^.J—. ZEZh££sJ&z£,., /2a_/ 9^£*i.rL«r> LI {^lLslXLjuz, 

### ->r- ^^/ rxr',^ t>ss-kM<sJ L <= -/-*,Hy nf J\« 1/nhA <9-> Eteirff-CJ-iS-aJi^. LuLS-.-f=i.c*AA Oa-aL 4aZc1A_Z>s*-= &r>^ j uoio*_ net jdlLC l"\l£>L 333 €L*3j±£-C S dL £-CJj5JLiL=^ £>ppsv e.t p,4 <^y t<^r\i<-^\p.+to^ to LjhfCjL. "ZZT n~> <*_ Ls<L<STiiP^ a^^J tJ, 

### Kis^cjHuli,- (
EXHIBIT 99.17



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
     Gerardo Canet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
     18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
     Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             materials respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.





                                /s/Gerardo Canet
                                   --------------------------------
                                   Gerardo Canet
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   August 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the annual report of Talisman Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Manzoni, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

By:

/s/ JOHN A. MANZONIName:

John A. ManzoniTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer


DATEDat Calgary, Alberta, as of March 8, 2010.

13

---



CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the annual report of Talisman Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L. Scott Thomson, Executive Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

By:

/s/ L. SCOTT THOMSONL. Scott Thomson
Executive Vice-President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer


DATEDat Calgary, Alberta, as of March 8, 2010.

14

---



QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Zale Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No. 333-67527, 333-51607, 333-20673, 333-01789, 33-87782,
333-53802, and 333-53804 on Form S-8) of Zale Corporation and subsdiaries
of our report dated August 28, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Zale Corporation and subsdiaries as of July 31, 2003 and 2002,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and
stockholders investment for each of the years then ended, which report
appears in the July 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Zale
Corporation and its subsidiaries. Our report refers to the adoption of
the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Boards Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations and No.
142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in fiscal year 2002, and to
the change in the method of determining price indices used in the
valuation of LIFO inventories in fiscal year 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP

---

Ft. Worth, Texas
October 9, 2003
CMS
    ENERGY CORPORATION
  Ratio of
    Earnings to Fixed Charges and Combined Fixed Charges and
    Preferred Dividends
 (Millions
    of Dollars)
  Year Ended December 312009


2008


2007


2006


2005(b)


(c)


(d)Earnings as defined(a)Pretax income from continuing operations

$
335


$
440


$
(317
)

$
(434
)

$
(773
)Exclude equity basis subsidiaries


2



(1
)


(22
)


(14
)


(17
)Fixed charges as defined(e)


456



429



489



535



539Earnings as defined(e)

$
793


$
868


$
150


$
87


$
(251
)Fixed charges as defined(a)Interest on long-term debt

$
383


$
371


$
415


$
492


$
514Estimated interest portion of lease rental


17



25



23



8



6Other interest charges


58



35



53



37



21Fixed charges as defined(e)

$
458


$
431


$
491


$
537


$
541Preferred dividends


17



17



12



11



10Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends

$
475


$
448


$
503


$
548


$
551Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


1.73



2.01











Ratio of earnings to combined fixedcharges and preferred dividends


1.67



1.94











     Regulation S-K.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06

- 3575

___________ CBS CORPORATION;

CBS BROADCASTING INC.;

CBS TELEVISIONSTATIONS INC.;

CBS STATIONS GROUP OF TEXAS L.P.;

and KUTV HOLDINGS, INC.,

Petitioners

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents

_______________________

Petition for Review of Orders of the

Federal Communications Commission

FCC Nos. 06

- 19 and 06

- 68

______________

Argued September 11, 2007

Decided July 21, 2008

Certiorari Granted, Judgment Vacated and Remanded

from the Supreme Court of the United States

May 4, 2009

Argued on Remand February 23, 2010

Before: SCIRICA, RENDELL and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

During the course of the litigation Mr. Jerome Shesta ck co

- counsel for CBS joined the

law firm of Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP, but did not file a change of address

with the Clerk. Mr. Shestack has since passed away.At the direction of the Court it is hereby O R D E R E D that t he opinion shall be

amended to reflect the change as follows:

Jerome J. Shestack, Esq.

Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP

1600 Market Street

Suite 3600

Philadelphia, PA 19103

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: November 18, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-663 (Fourth Review)]


Paper Clips From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on paper clips 
from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 
1675(c)), instituted this review on June 1, 2016 (81 FR 35052) and 
determined on September 6, 2016 that it would conduct a full review (82 
FR 13132, March 9, 2017). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's 
review and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was 
given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, 
U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing 
the notice in the Federal Register on March 9, 2017 (82 FR 13132). The 
hearing was cancelled on June 8, 2017 at the request of the domestic 
interested parties (82 FR 27285, June 14, 2017).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on August 24, 2017. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4719 (August 2017), 
entitled Paper Clips from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-663 (Fourth 
Review).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: August 24, 2017.
Katherine M. Hiner,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2017-18357 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHEL DOMINGUEZ

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 281

[ February 1, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Krista Marx , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016CF003242AXX

.

Louis G. Carres and Ronald S. Chapman, West Palm Beach, for

appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard

Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIA M

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., T AYLOR and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GLIATECH
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,440
<SECURITIES>                                    20,067
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                       437
<INVENTORY>                                      4,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,521
<PP&E>                                           5,410
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,538
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,432
<SALES>                                         23,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,929
<CGS>                                            3,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,531
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,531
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,531
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 4302 Lower Tribunal No. 2023

- DP

- 000059

_____________________________ In the Interest of S.D., a child

. A.D. , Appellant ,

v.
D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES and S TATEWIDE G UARDIAN A D L ITEM , Appellee s

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County

. Laura Shaffer , Judge.
May 7, 2024

PER CURIAM

.
AFFIRMED

.
NARDELLA , MIZE and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur. A.D., Ocala, pro se.
Kelley Schaeffer, Appellate Counsel, of Children’s Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee, Department of Children and Families.
Jennifer E. Jones, of McIntrye Thanasides Bringgold Elliot Grimaldi Guito & Matthews, P .A., Tampa, and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Caitlin E. Burke, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, o f Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee, Statewide Guardian ad Litem.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended November 30, 2004 of Arrow International, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl G. Anderson, Jr., the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge and based upon a review of the Report, that:

        (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for periods presented as required by such Report.

        This certification is based upon, among other things, my
responsibilities as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, my own due diligence
and representations made by certain other members of the Company's senior
management.


Date: January 10, 2005

                                /s/ Carl G. Anderson, Jr.
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Carl G. Anderson, Jr.
                                Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                (Principal Executive Officer)


                                      (31)
<PAGE>
                                 EXHIBIT 23(B)
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(b)

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-76347) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-73922) of
Consumers Energy Company of our report dated January 17, 2003 relating to the
financial statements of Midland Cogeneration Venture L.P. which appears in the
Consumers Energy Company Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 28, 2003
No. 1220.

No. 1221.

#### Phillips et al. *v.*Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.; and Crozier et al. *v.*Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.

June 10, 1946.

*Abe Fortas*and *Milton V. Freeman*for petitioners in No. 1220.

*Harold C. Ackert*and *John W. Giesecke*for petitioners in No. 1221.

*Arthur H. Dean, DeLano Andrews, Harry N. Baetjer*and *Edwin H. Burgess*for respondents.

*John D. Goodloe*and *W. Meade Fletcher*filed a memorandum on behalf of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland denied.