alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 839 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the rural addon payment in the Medicare home health benefit, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2015 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend 

the rural add-on payment in the Medicare home health 

benefit, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserve Access to 

5 Medicare Rural Home Health Services Act of 2015’’. 

6 (a) RURAL ADD-ON EXTENSION.—Section 421(a) of 

7 the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Mod8 ernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–173; 117 Stat. 

9 2283), as amended by section 5201(b) of the Deficit Re10 duction Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–171; 120 Stat. 46) 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 839 IS

1 and section 3131(c) of the Patient Protection and Afford2 able Care Act (Public Law 111–148; 124 Stat. 428), is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘2016’’ each place it appears and 

4 inserting ‘‘2021’’. 

5 (b) REVISION OF HOME HEALTH OUTLIER ADJUST6 MENT.—Section 1895(b)(5)(A) of the Social Security Act 

7 (42 U.S.C. 1395fff(b)(5)(A)) is amended, in the second 

8 sentence, by inserting ‘‘(or, in the case of each of 2016 

9 through 2020, 2.25 percent)’’ after ‘‘2.5 percent’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18523]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Number: PR17-58-000.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b), (e)+(g): Rate Petition 
and Revised Statement of Operating Conditions to be effective 8/23/
2017; Filing Type: 1300.
    Filed Date: 8/23/17.
    Accession Number: 201708235034.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/17.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/23/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-159-000.
    Applicants: Noble Energy, Inc., CNX Gas Company LLC.
    Description: Request for Extension of Temporary Waiver of CNX Gas 
Company LLC and Noble Energy, Inc.
    Filed Date: 8/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20170814-5183.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/28/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered, 
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated August 24, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-18523 Filed 8-31-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Argued and submitted June 25, 2007,

reversed and remanded May 28, 2008

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*SABRINA JOY WAIGHT, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Marion County Circuit Court

04C50644; A127984

189 P3d 28

Anne Fujita Munsey, Senior Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, and Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services.

Timothy Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*312PER CURIAM

This is a companion case to *State v. Goodall,*219 Or App 325, 183 P3d 199 (2008). Defendant and Goodall resided in the same home; defendant’s and Goodall’s cases were consolidated for trial. Defendant raises two assignments of error. We reverse and remand on the first assignment and, therefore, do not reach the second assignment.

In her first assignment of error, defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence found during a warrantless search of her home. In *Goodall,*219 Or App at 336, we held that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons expressed in *Goodall,*the trial court also erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence.

Reversed and remanded.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encysive Pharmaceuticals
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Bruce D. Given, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/  Bruce D. Given, M.D.
--------------------------------------------
Bruce D. Given, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer

May 3, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Encysive
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Form
10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Form 10-Q.
 Dated: May 13, 2009
    /s/ Raymond J. MerkRaymond J. MerkChief Financial Officer 26
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 17 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to give 

States the right to repeal Federal laws and regulations when ratified 

by the legislatures of two-thirds of the several States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2015 

Mr. ENZI introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to give States the right to repeal Federal laws 

and regulations when ratified by the legislatures of twothirds of the several States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 17 IS 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘Any provision of law or regulation of the United 

5 States may be repealed by the several States, and such 

6 repeal shall be effective when the legislatures of two-thirds 

7 of the several States approve resolutions for this purpose 

8 that particularly describe the same provision or provisions 

9 of law or regulation to be repealed.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 24(b)


February 27, 2004

Mr. S. Kinnie Smith, Jr.
Mr. Thomas J. Webb
Mr. Michael D. VanHemert
Consumers Energy Company
One Energy Plaza
Jackson, MI  49201-2276

Consumers Energy Company is required to file an Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
within 90 days after the end of the year.

We hereby make, constitute and appoint each of you our true and lawful attorney
for each of us and in each of our names, places and steads to sign and cause to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission said Annual Report with any
necessary exhibits, and any amendments thereto that may be required.

Very truly yours,




         /s/ Kenneth Whipple                       /s/ Joseph F. Paquette, Jr.
 ------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
           Kenneth Whipple                           Joseph F. Paquette, Jr.


       /s/ James J. Duderstadt                        /s/ William U. Parfet
 ------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
         James J. Duderstadt                            William U. Parfet


      /s/ Kathleen R. Flaherty                         /s/ Percy A. Pierre
 ------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
        Kathleen R. Flaherty                             Percy A. Pierre


         /s/ Earl D. Holton                         /s/ S. Kinnie Smith, Jr.
 ------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
           Earl D. Holton                             S. Kinnie Smith, Jr.


          /s/ David W. Joos                            /s/ Kenneth L. Way
 ------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
            David W. Joos                                Kenneth L. Way


       /s/ Michael T. Monahan                         /s/ John B. Yasinsky
 ------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
         Michael T. Monahan                             John B. Yasinsky
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, James A. Israel, President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., certify:

 

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from April 10, 2013 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2013 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through October 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 10, 2013 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2013 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 
| Date:   January 8, 2014 | Deere   Credit Services, Inc. |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                         |                               |
|                         |                               |
|                         |                               |
|                         | By                                 | */s/   James A. Israel* |   |
|                         |                               | James   A. Israel |   |
|                         |                               | President |   |

 

----
ex109to1012g04197_12152011.htm


Exhibit 10.9



Steel Partners II GP LLC


590 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor


New York, NY 10022


 









July 15, 2009








	
Steel Partners Holdings L.P.


590 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor


New York, NY 10022


 

	  





Effective as of June 29, 2009, Steel Partners II (Onshore) LP, a Delaware limited partnership, Steel Partners Holdings L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“SPH”), Steel Partners LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Steel Partners”), solely with respect to Article V therein, and Steel Partners II GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“SPIIGP”), solely with respect to Article V and Section 6.2 therein, entered into an Amended and Restated Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”).  Pursuant to Section 5.3(b) of the Exchange Agreement, SPIIGP agreed that, in the event that there is a decision made to not implement a complete Unwind (as defined therein), SPIIGP will transfer its general partnership interest in SPH to Steel Partners Holdings GP LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of SPH (“SPHGP”), and SPHGP will also become the general partner of Steel Partners II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“SPII”).  Effective as of July 14, 2009, SPH and Steel Partners entered into that certain Amended and Restated Management Agreement (the “Management Agreement”), a copy of which is attached hereto.  Pursuant to the Management Agreement, Steel Partners provides certain management services on behalf of and for the benefit of certain managed entities, including SPH and SPII.







A complete Unwind (as defined in the Exchange Agreement) has not occurred.  SPIIGP currently still serves as the general partner of SPII and hereby acknowledges its obligation, pursuant to Section 5.3(b) of the Exchange Agreement, to transfer its general partnership interest in SPH to SPHGP.  So long as it continues to serve as the general partner of SPII, SPIIGP hereby agrees that it shall manage SPII in accordance and consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement.







 



	  	
Sincerely,


	  	  
	  	
STEEL PARTNERS II GP LLC


	  	  
	  	
By:

	

/s/ Sanford Antignas




	  	
Name:

	
Sanford Antignas


	  	
Title:

	
Chief Operating Officer







 


 




  





1











  








 


Acknowledged and Agreed:



	
STEEL PARTNERS HOLDINGS L.P.


	  
	
By:

	
Steel Partners Holdings GP LLC


General Partner


	  
	
By:

	

/s/ Sanford Antignas




	
Name:

	
Sanford Antignas


	
Title:

	
Chief Operating Officer












Enclosure


 




  





2
| (i)    |       | the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| (ii)   |                           | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                             |

| /s/ DAVID L. GREENWOOD                               |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| David L. Greenwood                                   |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Alberto LEON-CENTENO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40797

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 30, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern Dis*684trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Alberto Leon-Centeno raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert, denied,*— U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Jeremiah BOURGEOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Paula CASEY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-35179.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.*

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Jeremiah Bourgeois, Monroe, WA, pro se.

*60Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jeremiah Bourgeois, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging that a state court judge violated his constitutional rights by denying his motion to waive filing fees. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether a case should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine. *Noel v. Hall,*341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir.2003). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record even if the district court did not rely on that basis. *See United States v. State of Wash.,*969 F.2d 752, 755 (9th Cir.1992). We affirm.

The district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction under the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine because Bourgeois’s action is a “forbidden de facto appeal from a judicial decision of a state court,” and raises constitutional claims that are “inextricably intertwined” with that prior state court decision. *Id.*at 1158.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation 

 Space Systems, Inc.

)

)

ASBCA No. 63512

)

Under Contract No. 000000-00-0-0000 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Evan R. Sherwood, Esq.

Peter B. Hutt, II, Esq.

 Covington & Burling LLP

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Samuel W. Morris, Esq.

 DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Evan Georgopoulos, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

 Defense Contract Management Agency

 Hanscom Air Force Base, MA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: November 22, 2023

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63512, Appeal of Northrop 

Grumman Systems Corporation Space Systems, Inc., rendered in conformance with the 

Board’s Charter.

Dated: November 22, 2023

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
##### 



Exhibit 99.3
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the periods covered in the Report.
 /s/ Raymond M. TrewhellaRaymond M. TrewhellaChairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Richard E. TrewhellaRichard E. TrewhellaTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
 November 29, 2005
 36
#### W.R. GRACE & CO., et al., petitioners, v. Margaret CHAKARIAN, et al.

No. 09-1546.

Oct. 4, 2010.

Case below, 591 F.Sd 164.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Educational attainment of foreign-born and native-born 
civilian labor force participants, 25 years and older, 2007


					
(numbers in thousands)				 Foreign born		  Native born
	
						Number	 Percent	Number	  Percent

Total, 25 years and over			21,540	  100.0		109,367	   100.0
	Less than a high school diploma		 5,893	   27.4		  6,514	     6.0
	High school graduates, no college	 5,400	   25.1		 33,139	    30.3
	Some college or associate degree	 3,538	   16.4		 32,349	    29.6
	Bachelor's degree or higher		 6,709	   31.1		 37,365	    34.2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 22 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 22

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Corps of Engineers and 
   the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the definition of 
   ``waters of the United States'' under the Federal Water Pollution 
                              Control Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2015

 Mrs. Ernst (for herself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Blunt, Mr. 
Boozman, Mr. Burr, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Coats, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. 
 Cotton, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Daines, Mr. Enzi, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. 
 Flake, Mr. Gardner, Mr. Graham, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Heller, 
   Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Lee, Mr. 
McCain, Mr. Moran, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Paul, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Risch, Mr. 
Roberts, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Sasse, Mr. Scott, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 
Shelby, Mr. Thune, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Wicker, Mr. 
Sullivan, and Mr. McConnell) introduced the following joint resolution; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Corps of Engineers and 
   the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the definition of 
   ``waters of the United States'' under the Federal Water Pollution 
                              Control Act.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Corps of Engineers and the Environmental 
Protection Agency relating to ``Clean Water Rule: Definition of `Waters 
of the United States''' (80 Fed. Reg. 37054; June 29, 2015), and such 
rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```