alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Nicholas L.Teti, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Inamed Corporation(the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,based on my knowledge:

(1)   the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certificationis attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theRegistrant.
| Dated:  March 16, 2005             |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ NICHOLAS L. TETI                              |   |
| Nicholas L. Teti,                                 |
| *Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer* |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)*                   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Inamed Corporation and will be retained by Inamed Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

1

----
EXHIBIT 10.1 



 


Assignment and Bill of Sale between NWT
        and 3-M Production Co. dated October 10, 2011


 


 


The accompanying PDF document contains the signed operating agreement.
#### GROGAN v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

Civ. No. 4523.

United States District Court W. D. New York.

Dec. 26, 1950.

*187Moule, Miles & Forhead, Buffalo, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Harold J. Adams and Percy R. Smith, Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant.

KNIGHT, Chief Judge.

Defendant has filed objections to plaintiff’s Interrogatories Nos. 1 to 8, inclusive. Upon the argument of the motion it appears that plaintiff, an elderly woman, was traveling alone as a paying passenger on defendant’s train from Washington to Buffalo, New York; that she was injured while being “transported” by the defendant; that her injuries were so severe that she was unable to care for her own affairs in the obtaining of witnesses; that she was removed in a wheel chair by defendant’s employees from the train to an office of one of defendant’s agents and after some questioning in the railroad office she was wheeled to and placed in a taxicab, and taken to her 'home. Being alone and unable because of her injuries to obtain the names and addresses of witnesses, plaintiff is now seeking that information.

The Interrogatories are to obtain the names and addresses of persons other than defendant’s employees and agents who were in the room where plaintiff was when injured or in the car where plaintiff was a passenger and who have some knowledge of the accident. Under the circumstances plaintiff would be entitled to the information sought. Rules 33 and 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A.

In Walsh v. Pullman Co., D.C., 9 F.R.D. 107, 108, the court said: “Defendants concede that it lies within the discretion of the court to require them to disclose such information. Rule 26(b) expressly provides that discovery may 'be had concerning the identity and location of persons having knowledge of relevant facts.”

In Canuso v. City of Niagara Falls, D.C., 4 F.R.D. 362, 364, the court, Knight, J., writing, said: “Each action should stand upon its own. The novelty and facts of the individual case- must determine whether or not interrogatories should be granted.”

In Aktiebolaget Vargos v. Clark, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 635, 636, the court said: “True, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 26(b), 28 U.S.C.A., which governs the scope both of depositions and interrogatories, it is permissible to inquire into the identity and location of persons having knowledge of relevant facts, for the purpose of discovery.”

See also: Moorman v. Simon, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 328; F. & M. Skirt Co. v. A. Wimpfheimer & Bro., D.C., 25 F.Supp. 898.

In the exercise of discretion in this action, the objections of the defendant are disallowed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
2000 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      14,314,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  640,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,216,250
<PP&E>                                       2,922,714
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,460,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,757,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          847,883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    50,349,097
<OTHER-SE>                                (34,439,238)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,757,742
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               931,922
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  959,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,907,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,467,035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,467,035)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,467,035)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.750)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.750)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 752 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 752

To establish a scorekeeping rule to ensure that increases in guarantee 
    fees of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shall not be used to offset 
                 provisions that increase the deficit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2015

Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Warner, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Tester, Mr. Corker, 
   Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Donnelly, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Heller, Mr. 
  Scott, and Mr. Moran) introduced the following bill; which was read 
           twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish a scorekeeping rule to ensure that increases in guarantee 
    fees of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shall not be used to offset 
                 provisions that increase the deficit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING THE USE OF GUARANTEE FEES AS AN OFFSET.

    In the Senate, for purposes of determining budgetary impacts to 
evaluate points of order under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, 
any previous budget resolution, and any subsequent budget resolution, 
provisions contained in any bill, resolution, amendment, motion, or 
conference report that increases, or extends the increase of, any 
guarantee fees of the Federal National Mortgage Association and the 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation shall not be scored with respect 
to the level of budget authority, outlays, or revenues contained in 
such legislation.
                                 <all>
```
| (a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to UMED Holdings, Inc. is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (c) | Disclosed in this report any change in UMED Holdings, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during UMED Holdings, Inc.'s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, UMED Holdings, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect UMED H9oldings, Inc.'s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in UMED Holdings, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 994 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1 Walter Hammond Place in Waldwick, New 

Jersey, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Joseph D’Augustine Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 994 ES

1 SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT JOSEPH D’AUGUSTINE POST 

2 OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1 Walter Hammond Place in 

5 Waldwick, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Joseph D’Augustine Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Joseph 

12 D’Augustine Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate May 11, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 994 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostJoseph D’Augustine Post Office Building’’. in Waldwick, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant al Service located at 1 Walter Hammond Place
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

p0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138655 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138655 

 COA: 283610 

Wayne CC: 07-014289-FC 

LEROY O’NEIL HOPKINS, a/k/a 

ERIC MOSLEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE>

                              KRONOS INCORPORATED
          Exhibit 11 - Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
                        (In thousands, except share data)

                                                   Three Months Ended          Six Months Ended
                                                ------------------------  -----------------------
                                                 March 29,    March 30,    March 29,    March 30,
                                                   1997        1996          1997         1996
                                                -----------   ----------  -----------  ----------


<S>                                             <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>       
Net income ..................................   $    1,779   $    2,365   $    3,965   $    4,516
                                                ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========


Net income per common share:
      Primary:
          Weighted average shares outstanding    8,185,134    8,019,061    8,158,144    7,984,979
          Common Stock equivalents ..........      254,482      300,439      247,348      315,601
                                                ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
          Total .............................    8,439,616    8,319,500    8,405,492    8,300,580
                                                ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

          Net income per common share .......   $     0.21   $     0.28   $     0.47   $     0.54
                                                ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========


      Fully diluted:
          Weighted average shares outstanding    8,185,134    8,019,061    8,158,144    7,984,979
          Common Stock equivalents ..........      254,493      300,439      260,345      315,601
                                                ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
          Total .............................    8,439,627    8,319,500    8,418,489    8,300,580
                                                ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

          Net income per common share .......   $     0.21   $     0.28   $     0.47   $     0.54
                                                ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

</TABLE>
biostem_ex104.htm


Exhibit 10.4


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), is executed on September 3, 2011, by and between Biostem U.S. Corporation, a Florida corporation (the “Company”), and John Satino (“Employee”). All capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in that certain Employment Agreement dated June 1, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”). In consideration of the premises, terms, conditions and covenants set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.   Amendment. Employee hereby waives and forgives any accrued but unpaid Base Compensation which may be outstanding as of the date hereof. Further, Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:


 


2.1           Base Compensation. In consideration of the services rendered to the Company (and/or its Affiliates) by Employee, during the Term (as defined in Section 3), until such time as the parties otherwise agree, Employee shall receive annual compensation of $6,000, payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll schedule (the “Base Compensation”).


 


2.   No Other Amendments. Except as specifically amended pursuant to this Amendment, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms, and each party hereto hereby confirms and agrees to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.


 


3.   Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


4.   Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Florida.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 





	 	 	EMPLOYEE:	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
 

	 	 
	 	 	John Satino	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COMPANY	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Biostem U.S. Corporation	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	 	 
	 	Name:	 	 
	 	Title:
Execution Copy
 
 Amendment Buyer Originator
  Receivables Sale Agreement
  Amendments Section 2
 Exhibit 1 Receivable
 Receivable provided




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties
   Conditions Precedent Effective Date
 Reference to and Effect on the Transaction Documents
    Execution in Counterparts
 2




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Headings
  3




---



##### 



CONSUMERS RECEIVABLES FUNDING II, LLCBy:
    /s/ Thomas J. WebbName:
    Thomas J. WebbTitle:
    Executive Vice PresidentCONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANYBy:
    /s/ Thomas J. WebbName:
    Thomas J. WebbTitle:
    Executive Vice President and CFOConsented to by:

FALCON ASSET SECURITIZATION COMPANY LLCBy:
    JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., its attorney-in-factBy:Name:
    Patrick MenichilloTitle:
    Vice PresidentJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as a Financial
Institution and Administrative AgentBy:Name:
    Patrick MenichilloTitle:
    Vice President Signature Page to Amendment No. 3 to RSA
 4




---



##### 



CONSUMERS RECEIVABLES FUNDING II, LLCBy:Name:
    Thomas J. WebbTitle:
    Executive Vice PresidentCONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANYBy:Name:
    Thomas J. WebbTitle:
    Executive Vice President and CFOConsented to by:
FALCON ASSET SECURITIZATION COMPANY LLCBy:
    JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., its attorney-in-factBy:
    /s/ Patrick MenichilloName:
    Patrick MenichilloTitle:
    Vice PresidentJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as a Financial
Institution and Administrative AgentBy:
    /s/ Patrick MenichilloName:
    Patrick MenichilloTitle:
    Vice President Signature Page to Amendment No. 3 to RSA
 5
EX-35.2
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC  28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
dated as of May 1, 2013, by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation
II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master
Servicer and Certificate Administrator, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as
Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor and Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, with respect to Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through GSMS Certificates Series 2013-GCJ12 (the
"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall
have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive
Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
   January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of
   its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my
   supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
   respects throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 7th
day of March 2014.


/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 1

National Safety Council Congress

by William J. Wiatrowski

Originally Posted: October 29, 2003

The National Safety Council, the Nation’s leading safety and health membership organization, held its annual Congress and

Expo in early September, in Chicago, Illinois. A retrospective of old public service announcements--from Gracie Allen to

"Buckle Up for Safety" to Wil E Coyote--was a good starting point to the session on workplace safety. Keynote speakers John

Henshaw, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, and Dave Lauriski, Assistant Secretary for Mine

Safety and Health, stressed the goals of reducing workplace injuries, illnesses, and fatalities, and referenced the important

role of BLS data in monitoring these events.

The availability and use of BLS data were the subject of two technical sessions known as "Science@Work." These sessions

are designed to provide safety practitioners with "useful ideas and tools to improve [their] organization’s safety and health

performance, and impress those who are skeptical about investing in safety and health." BLS economist Jim Barnhardt

provided an in-depth view of the safety and health statistics available on the BLS website. The audience got many practical

lessons on how to navigate the website and where to find answers to their safety and health questions.

In a session called "Fatal Injuries on the Job," Kate Newman, Scott Richardson, Kathy Loh, and Janice Windau, all from BLS,

examined trends in occupational fatalities in recent years. Detailed data were provided on deaths among Hispanic workers,

deaths due to falls--which have been on the rise in recent years--and deaths due to violence in the workplace. Most of the

data presented were from the BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries.1

The large exhibit hall at Chicago’s McCormick Place was filled with more than 700 exhibitors, including a booth sponsored by

BLS. The booth provided another opportunity to showcase BLS safety and health data; many attendees who had heard the

technical sessions given by Jim Barnhardt and others later visited the information booth.

Notes

1 National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries in 2002, USDL 03-488 (U.S. Department of Labor), September 17, 2003. For more

information, visit the BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries home page, at http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Division of Information and Marketing Services, PSB Suite 2850, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC

20212-0001 | www.bls.gov/OPUB | Telephone: 1-202-691-5200 | Contact Us