alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 943 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that a duty of 

the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is to ensure that Internal Revenue 

Service employees are familiar with and act in accord with certain taxpayer rights. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 15, 2015 

Mr. PORTMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

that a duty of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue 

is to ensure that Internal Revenue Service employees 

are familiar with and act in accord with certain taxpayer 

rights. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Bill of 

5 Rights Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 943 IS

1 SEC. 2. DUTY TO ENSURE THAT IRS EMPLOYEES ARE FA2 MILIAR WITH AND ACT IN ACCORD WITH CER3 TAIN TAXPAYER RIGHTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7803(a) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating para6 graph (3) as paragraph (4) and by inserting after para7 graph (2) the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(3) EXECUTION OF DUTIES IN ACCORD WITH

9 TAXPAYER RIGHTS.—In discharging his duties, the 

10 Commissioner shall ensure that employees of the In11 ternal Revenue Service are familiar with and act in 

12 accord with taxpayer rights as afforded by other 

13 provisions of this title, including— 

14 ‘‘(A) the right to be informed, 

15 ‘‘(B) the right to quality service, 

16 ‘‘(C) the right to pay no more than the 

17 correct amount of tax, 

18 ‘‘(D) the right to challenge the position of 

19 the Internal Revenue Service and be heard, 

20 ‘‘(E) the right to appeal a decision of the 

21 Internal Revenue Service in an independent 

22 forum, 

23 ‘‘(F) the right to finality, 

24 ‘‘(G) the right to privacy, 

25 ‘‘(H) the right to confidentiality, 

26 ‘‘(I) the right to retain representation, and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 943 IS

1 ‘‘(J) the right to a fair and just tax sys2 tem.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

5 of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE NINE
WEST GROUP INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MAY 1, 1999 AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                          29,637
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (50,226)
<INVENTORY>                                    423,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               609,442
<PP&E>                                         251,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                (89,953)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,188,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          163,101
<BONDS>                                        486,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           360
<OTHER-SE>                                     470,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,188,322
<SALES>                                        441,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               441,867
<CGS>                                          245,409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  245,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               167,241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,272
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,742
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,139
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,603
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,603
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 7, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-21109

Summary Calendar

 

GORDON JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LAWRENCE HODGES, Warden II; CHARLES WILLIAMSON, Assistant

Warden; RICHARD GUNNELS, Major; CRAIG FISHER, Captain;

MR. ROSADO, Lieutenant; MONTGOMERY, Lieutenant; J. GUTIERREZ,

Sergeant; B. CARDOZA, UGI Sergeant; V. J. GREIGER, Correction

Officer; V. WILLIS KING, Correction Officer; GAIL THOMPSON, 

Law Library Supervisor; W. TAYLOR, Counsel Substitute; D.

COLE, Warden I; M. MUNSELLE, Assistant Warden; JAMIE BAKER, 

Major; FREDERICK MERIDA, Captain; JOE PONDER, Captain; D.

SNODGRASS; NELDA BUEHLER, UGI; ANTONIOUS FLANAGAN,

Correctional Officer IV; W. SMITH, Correctional Officer IV;

KELLI WARD, RGN V Griv INV; JANE M. COCKERHAM, Ombudsman;

FRANK HOKE, ACT Administrator,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-03-CV-3672

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Gordon Johnson, Texas prisoner # 748915, appeals from the

district court’s pre-trial order striking his original civil
No. 03-21109

-2-

rights complaint and directing him to file an amended, concise

complaint. This court does not have jurisdiction over this

appeal. See Click v. Abilene Nat’l Bank, 822 F.2d 544, 545 (5th

Cir. 1987). The collateral order doctrine does not apply to the

present case. See Exxon Chems. Am. v. Chao, 298 F.3d 464, 469

(5th Cir. 2002). Johnson’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.
#### TEVINGTON v. INTERNATIONAL MILLING CO. et al.

Civil Action No. 1889.

District Court, W. D. New York

Sept. 7, 1945.

See, also, D.C., 62 F.Supp. 462.

William J. Brock, of Buffalo, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Adams, Smith, Brown & Starrett, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Edmund S. Brown, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant International Milling Co.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves under Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to require the defendant International Milling Company to furnish a bill of particulars of its affirmative defenses, to wit: contributory negligence and negligence on the part of fellow servants’.

 The plaintiff mistakes his remedy. Section 12(e), supra, has doubtless been considered in more cases than has any other section of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. While earlier there were many divergent views as to the application of this section, the views of late have become more harmonious. It is believed that the con-census of the opinions of the courts now is that the two purposes stated in Rule 12(e) are to be read together. In other words, both are to be construed as relating to the purpose of enabling one to plead. As was said in Braden v. Callaway, D.C., 4 F.R.D. 147, 148: “That the words ‘to prepare for trial’ are comprehended in the immediately preceding words, ‘to prepare his responsive pleadings.’ ” “This rule may only be invoked when the pleading is so vague or uncertain that the defendant cannot adequately prepare responsive pleadings.” Walling v. Black Diamond Coal Mining Co., D.C., 59 F.Supp. 348, 350. Vide also: Raudenbush v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., D.C., 4 F.R.D. 171; Walling v. American S. S. Co., D.C., 4 F.R.D. 355 (opinion by this Court) ; Parker v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc., D.C., 4 F.R.D. 325.

The allegations in question meet the requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Complaint and Answer have been served and no Reply is required.

Concluding, the Court may well quote from the expression of the Advisory Committee of the Rules of Civil Procedure relative to an amendment to 12(e), that is: “Rule 12(e) as originally drawn has been the subject of more judicial rulings than any other part of the rules, and has been much criticized by commentators, judges and members of the bar. * * * The tendency of some courts freely to grant extended bills of particulars has served to neutralize any helpful benefits derived from Rule 8, and has overlooked the intended use of the rules on depositions and discovery. The words ‘or to prepare for trial’ — eliminated by the proposed amendment — have sometimes been seized upon as grounds for compulsory statement in the opposing pleading of all the details which the movant would have to meet at the trial.” The proposed change in 12(e) reads: “Before responding to a pleading, a party may move for a more definite statement of any matte: *508where the pleading is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading.” Enough has been said.

The motion in all respects must be denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

ON REMAND

NO. 03-07-00214-CR

Jeffrey Rouse, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2020119, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). 

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

John F. Onion, Jr., Justice

Before Justices Pemberton, Waldrop and Onion*

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion on Remand

Filed: February 5, 2010

Do Not Publish

* Before John F. Onion, Jr., Presiding Judge (retired), Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, sitting by

assignment. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 74.003(b) (West 2005).
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Rex T.Clevenger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:November 9, 2009

 
| /s/  Rex T. Clevenger         |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Rex  T. Clevenger             |   |
| Executive  Vice President and |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer      |   |

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Reclamation

          - [RR02800000, 17XR0680A3, RX178689471000000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice to reopen comment period.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is reopening the public comment period on the scope of the draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Shasta Dam Fish Passage Evaluation.

# DATES:

The comment period for the scope of the draft EIS published June 15, 2017 (82 FR 27522), is reopened. Comments should be received on or before September 28, 2017.

# ADDRESSES:

                        You may send comments to Ms. Carolyn Bragg, Natural Resources Specialist, Bureau of Reclamation, Bay-Delta Office, 801 I Street, Suite 140, Sacramento, CA 95814-2536; or by email to                         *cbragg@usbr.gov;*                         or via facsimile to (916) 414-2439.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Carolyn Bragg, (916) 414-2433, or email at                         *cbragg@usbr.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On June 15, 2017, Reclamation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     announcing its intent to prepare a draft EIS. Since then, Reclamation has received a formal request from the                           ( print page 41050)                        public requesting more time to comment on the scope of the draft EIS. This notice reopens that comment period for 30 days.                

## Public Disclosure

Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Dated: July 27, 2017.

Travis B. Aberle,

Assistant Regional Director of Business Services.

[FR Doc. 2017-18267 Filed 8-28-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4332-90-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aspect Medical
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended April 3, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, J. Neal Armstrong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                /s/ J. Neal Armstrong
                                                --------------------------------
Dated: May 12, 2004                             J. Neal Armstrong
                                                Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Aspect Medical Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Aspect
Medical Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8119

In Re: GENE ELLIS WILLIAMS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-86-40-P)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 12, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gene Ellis Williams, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gene Ellis Williams petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus, complaining of delay by the district court in resolving his

Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion. The district court granted the relief

sought by Williams, entering an amended judgment on January 11,

1996. Although leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the

petition for mandamus is dismissed as moot. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
     with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"), I John W. Hlywak, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
     certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
     of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                                                  /s/John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     May 14, 2004



Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
any other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 781 

To improve knowledge about the best practices for teaching financial literacy, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2015 

Mr. DONNELLY (for himself and Mr. SCOTT) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To improve knowledge about the best practices for teaching 

financial literacy, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Empowering Student 

5 Borrowers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BEST PRACTICES FOR TEACHING FINANCIAL LIT7 ERACY. 

8 Part C of title I of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

9 (20 U.S.C. 1015 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 781 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 138. BEST PRACTICES FOR TEACHING FINANCIAL LIT2 ERACY. 

3 ‘‘(a) BEST PRACTICES.— 

4 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—After soliciting public com5 ments and consulting with and receiving input from 

6 relevant parties, including a diverse set of institu7 tions of higher education and other parties, the Sec8 retary shall, by not later than 1 year after the date 

9 of enactment of the Empowering Student Borrowers 

10 Act, establish best practices for institutions of high11 er education regarding methods to— 

12 ‘‘(A) teach financial literacy skills; and 

13 ‘‘(B) provide useful and necessary informa14 tion to assist students at the institutions of 

15 higher education when making financial deci16 sions related to student borrowing. 

17 ‘‘(2) BEST PRACTICES.—The best practices de18 scribed in paragraph (1) shall include the following: 

19 ‘‘(A) Methods to ensure that students have 

20 a clear sense of the students’ total borrowing 

21 obligations, including monthly payments, and 

22 repayment options. 

23 ‘‘(B) The most effective ways to engage 

24 students in financial literacy education, includ25 ing frequency and timing of communication 

26 with students. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 781 IS

1 ‘‘(C) Information on how to target dif2 ferent student populations, including part-time 

3 students, first-time students, and other non4 traditional students. 

5 ‘‘(D) Ways to clearly communicate the im6 portance of graduating on a student’s ability to 

7 repay student loans. 

8 ‘‘(b) MAINTENANCE OF BEST PRACTICES.—The Sec9 retary shall maintain and periodically update the best 

10 practices information required under subsection (a) and 

11 make the best practices available to the public.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
J^a^Jth, CUuss ^/XSRJLUL

-s52 J2AratzL£LsJ\ir\ K Q* ^

J&JXxitACQa , Td *7 76"g"^

RECEIVER.

fsJkcuxxzi. /1, 'X0\^ """"ctmi^.

F£B 25 20)5

Lourr n+ Lclca.La.ci A-fLp&sdl ^foe^gggjw-pj—jy.a. g,t /a^ofr

Au^oJ T/. "7? 11 I

$K: 7 D-Q53 S~-1W A /a ^ u. SA.A Co A //„ 0%/3-ooat<f-ce

-Ppy-r- £L/irlL

"^ btby.l- re.C,e,ltS<Le4 ,O.0_tLCA V^sdt. on FthrUtH^y cfi Hdl^

7\s C^l-,*-*- Afl( reluXtJ Ln-k^ ne.jih^S -hr-dm UJ SXv/f

&f\mJL AlLpeJJji^.J—. ZEZh££sJ&z£,., /2a_/ 9^£*i.rL«r> LI {^lLslXLjuz,

->r- ^^/ rxr',^ t>ss-kM<sJ L <= -/-*, Hy n f J\« 1/nhA <9->

Eteir ff-CJ-iS-aJi^. LuLS-.-f=i.c*AA Oa-aL 4aZc1A_Z>s*-= &r>^ j uoio*_ net

jdlLC l"\l£>L 333 €L*3j±£-C S dL£-CJj5JLiL=^

£>ppsv e.t p,4 <^y t<^r\i<-^\p.+to^ to LjhfCjL. "ZZT n~>

<*_ Ls<L<STiiP^ a^^J tJ,

Kis^cjHuli,- (