Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 6, 2017 / Notices 42075 

1See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel 

Plate Products from the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 12431 

(March 3, 2017) (Preliminary Results). 

2See the case briefs from Nucor Corporation and 

Hyundai Steel Company dated April 3, 2017, the 

redacted case brief from Samsung C&T Corporation 

dated April 7, 2017, and the rebuttal briefs from 

Nucor Corporation, Hyundai Steel Company, and 

Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. dated April 10, 2017. 

3See the Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Certain Cut-toLength Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from 

the Republic of Korea; 2015–2016,’’ dated 

concurrently with and hereby adopted by this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

4See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 12432 and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

at 3. 

5 In its case brief, Samsung C&T Corporation 

requested that the Department issue a final 

determination of no shipments for Samsung C&T 

Engineering & Construction Group and Samsung 

C&T Trading and Investment Group. See Samsung 

C&T Corporation’s redacted case brief dated April 

7, 2017. We denied this request. See Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 8. 

6See Issues and Decision Memorandum for 

further details on the changes we made for these 

final results. See also the Memoranda, ‘‘Certain Cutto-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from 

the Republic of Korea: Final Analysis Memorandum 

for Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd.,’’ and ‘‘Certain Cutto-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from 

the Republic of Korea: Final Results Analysis 

Memorandum for Hyundai Steel Company,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–836] 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate Products From the 

Republic of Korea: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2015–2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On March 3, 2017, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate 

products (CTL plate) from the Republic 

of Korea (Korea). Based on our analysis 

of the comments received, we continue 

to find that subject merchandise has 

been sold at less than normal value. 

DATES: Applicable September 6, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Yang Jin Chun or Thomas Schauer, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5760 or (202) 482–0410, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 3, 2017, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

administrative review.1 The period of 

review is February 1, 2015, through 

January 31, 2016. We invited interested 

parties to comment on the Preliminary 

Results and received case and rebuttal 

briefs from interested parties.2

The Department conducted this 

review in accordance with section 751 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the 

antidumping duty order are certain CTL 

plate. Imports of CTL plate are currently 

classified in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

under subheadings 7208.40.30.30, 

7208.40.30.60, 7208.51.00.30, 

7208.51.00.45, 7208.51.00.60, 

7208.52.00.00, 7208.53.00.00, 

7208.90.00.00, 7210.70.30.00, 

7210.90.90.00, 7211.13.00.00, 

7211.14.00.30, 7211.14.00.45, 

7211.90.00.00, 7212.40.10.00, 

7212.40.50.00, 7212.50.00.00, 

7225.40.30.50, 7225.40.70.00, 

7225.50.60.00, 7225.99.00.90, 

7226.91.50.00, 7226.91.70.00, 

7226.91.80.00, and 7226.99.00.00. While 

the HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, 

the written description is dispositive. A 

full description of the scope of the order 

is contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties in this review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, which is hereby adopted 

by this notice. A list of the issues raised 

is attached in the Appendix to this 

notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov and to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

room B–8024 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/index.html. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

We preliminarily found that Daewoo 

International Corp., GS Global Corp., 

Hyosung Corporation, Hyundai Glovis 

Co., Ltd., Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co., 

Ltd., Samsung C&T Corporation, 

Samsung Heavy Industries, and SK 

Networks Co., Ltd. did not have any 

reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR.4 After the 

Preliminary Results, we received no 

comments or additional information 

with respect to these eight companies.5

Therefore, for the final results, we 

continue to find that these eight 

companies did not have any reviewable 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR. Consistent with our practice, 

we will issue appropriate instructions to 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) based on our final results. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of comments 

received, we revised the preliminary 

margin calculations for Dongkuk Steel 

Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM) and Hyundai Steel 

Company (Hyundai Steel). These 

revisions resulted in changes to the 

margins for DSM and the respondents 

not selected for individual examination, 

but no changes to the margin for 

Hyundai Steel, for the final results of 

this review.6

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the respondents for the period 

February 1, 2015, through January 31, 

2016. 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

BDP International ................. 2.03 

Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd .......... 2.03 

Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd .. 1.84 

Hyundai Steel Company ....... 2.05 

Samsung C&T Engineering 

& Construction Group ....... 2.03 

Samsung C&T Trading and 

Investment Group ............. 2.03 

Sung Jin Steel Co., Ltd ........ 2.03 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this proceeding 

within five days after public 

announcement of the final results in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
42076 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 6, 2017 / Notices 

7 In these final results, the Department applied 

the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

8See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate Products from the Republic of Korea: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and New Shipper Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 

62712, 62714 (September 12, 2016). 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

For DSM and Hyundai Steel, we 

calculated importer-specific assessment 

rates on the basis of the ratio of the total 

amount of antidumping duties 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of the 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).7 For entries of subject 

merchandise during the period of 

review produced by DSM or Hyundai 

Steel for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. For the companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination, BDP International, Bookuk 

Steel Co., Ltd., Samsung C&T 

Engineering & Construction Group, 

Samsung C&T Trading and Investment 

Group, and Sung Jin Steel Co., Ltd., we 

will instruct CBP to apply the rates 

listed above to all entries of subject 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by these firms. For the eight companies 

that we determined had no reviewable 

entries of the subject merchandise in 

this review period, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate any applicable entries of 

subject merchandise at the all-others 

rate. We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the final results of these 

reviews. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be applicable upon publication of 

this notice for all shipments of CTL 

plate from Korea entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the companies 

listed above will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior completed segment of 

the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation but 

the producer has been covered in a prior 

complete segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the producer of the merchandise; (4) 

the cash deposit rate for all other 

manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be 0.98 percent,8 the allothers rate determined in the less-thanfair-value (LTFV) investigation, adjusted 

for the export-subsidy rate in the 

companion countervailing duty 

investigation. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a violation subject to sanction. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: August 30, 2017. 

Gary Taverman. 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of the Order 

Rates for Respondents Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Differential Pricing 

Comment 2: Major-Input Rule 

Comment 3: Cost Differences Not 

Associated With Physical Characteristics 

Comment 4: Cost of Prime Products 

Comment 5: Affiliated-Party Inputs 

Comment 6: Overrun Sales 

Comment 7: Marine Insurance 

Comment 8: Reviewable Entries 

[FR Doc. 2017–18824 Filed 9–5–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–836] 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube From Mexico: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2015–2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on light-walled 

rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) 

from Mexico. The period of review is 

August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016. 

The review covers one producer/ 

exporter of the subject merchandise, 

Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. 

de C.V (Productos Laminados). We 

preliminarily determine that sales of 

subject merchandise by Productos 

Laminados and affiliated reseller, 

Aceros Cuatros Caminos S.A. de C.V. 

(A4C) (collectively, Prolamsa), were not 

made at less than normal value during 

the period of review. Interested parties 

are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable September 6, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Madeline Heeren, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–9179. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

These preliminary results of review 

are made in accordance with section 

733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). On October 14, 

2016, the Department published the 

notice of initiation for the 

administrative review.1 For a complete 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES