alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Nursing assistants

Provide or assist with basic care or support under the direction of 

onsite licensed nursing staff. Perform duties such as monitoring of 

health status, feeding, bathing, dressing, grooming, toileting, or 

ambulation of patients in a health or nursing facility. May include 

medication administration and other health-related tasks. Includes 

nursing care attendants, nursing aides, and nursing attendants.

Cognitive and mental requirements

The qualifications that workers need to use judgment, make decisions, 

interact with others, and adapt to changes in jobs.

In 2023, work was reviewed by a supervisor more than once per day for 72.3 percent of nursing assistants, and once per 

day for 18.6 percent.

Table 1. Percentage of nursing assistants with cognitive and mental requirements, 

2023

Requirement Yes No

Pace: Pause control 27.0 73.0

Interaction with general public >99.5 <0.5

Working around crowds 1.1 98.9

Telework <0.5 >99.5

Work review: Supervising others 0.7 99.3

Work review: Presence of supervisor 85.9 14.1

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Requirements Survey

Education, training, and experience requirements

The minimum level of formal 

education required, 

credentials necessary, on-thejob training, and prior work 

experience necessary for 

average performance in jobs.

In 2023, credentials were 

required for 89.0 percent of 

nursing assistants. Prior work 

experience was required for 

14.1 percent and on-the-job 

training was required for 91.8 

percent.

A high school diploma was 

required for 68.1 percent of 

nursing assistants.
Occupational Requirements Survey ●www.bls.gov/ors ●orsinfo@bls.gov ●202.691.6199

Environmental conditions

The various tangible or concrete hazards 

or difficulties that are in the vicinity of 

where jobs’ critical tasks are performed.

In 2023, greater than 99.5 percent of 

nursing assistants were not exposed to 

extreme cold, and greater than 99.5 

percent were not exposed to extreme 

heat. Heavy vibrations were not present 

for greater than 99.5 percent, and 82.2 

percent were not exposed to the 

outdoors.

Physical demands

Refer to the physical activities required to 

perform tasks in jobs. The presence and, in 

some cases, duration of these activities are 

published.

In 2023, reaching at or below the shoulder 

was required for 97.1 percent of nursing 

assistants and was not required for 2.9 

percent.

Performing work in low postures was 

required for 98.2 percent of nursing 

assistants and was not required for 1.8 

percent.

The choice to sit or stand when performing 

critical tasks was available to 11.0 percent 

of nursing assistants. On average, workers 

spent 15.9 percent of the workday sitting and 84.1 percent of the workday standing.

Table 2. Percentage of nursing assistants with physical demands, 2023

Requirement Yes No

Choice of sitting or standing 11.0 89.0

Driving 8.5 91.5

Climbing structure-related ramps or stairs 10.8 89.2

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Requirements Survey
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 3 Referred in House (RFH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 3

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2015

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
      for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF 
              KING KAMEHAMEHA.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on June 7, 2015, to celebrate the 
birthday of King Kamehameha I.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the Senate April 23, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO CORTES-ALDANA and

MARIA DE LA LUZ CORTES,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70117

Agency Nos. A095-193-323

 A095-193-324

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010 ** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Roberto Cortes Aldana and Maria de la Luz Cortes, natives and citizens of

Mexico, petition pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals denying their third motion to reopen, challenging the denial of their

FILED

SEP 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70117

underlying cancellation of removal application and seeking to apply for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

Petitioners contend that their United States citizen children will experience

hardship if they return to Mexico and therefore they are entitled to cancellation

relief. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ third motion to

reopen as time- and number-barred, and petitioners may not reopen their

cancellation of removal claim. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229a(c)(7)(A) & (C)(1); 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(b)(2) & (c)(2), 

Petitioners also contend that country conditions have changed in Mexico

thereby excusing the time and numerical bars to reopening their asylum,

withholding, and CAT claims. Petitioners further contend that they will be

persecuted because they will be perceived as wealthy and potential kidnapping

victims because they are Mexicans returning from the United States, thereby

entitling them to asylum, withholding, and CAT relief. Petitioners failed to

establish changed country conditions in Mexico that are material to petitioners and

their circumstances. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538

F.3d 988, 996-97 (9th Cir. 2008). In addition, petitioners failed to establish that

they qualify as a cognizable social group, and therefore did not demonstrate prima

facie eligibility for the asylum, and withholding relief requested. See Delgado-
3 09-70117

Ortiz v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1151-52 (9th Cir. 2010) (rejecting as a particular

social group “returning Mexicans from the United States”). Petitioners also failed

to establish that it was more likely than not that they would be tortured if returned

to Mexico, and thereby they failed to establish prima facie eligibility for CAT

protection. See id. at 1152.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 592 

To improve the transition between experimental permits and commercial 

licenses for commercial reusable launch vehicles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2015 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. HEINRICH, and Mr. UDALL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To improve the transition between experimental permits and 

commercial licenses for commercial reusable launch vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH LICENSING. 

4 Section 50906 of title 51, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘launched or 

7 reentered’’ and inserting ‘‘launched or reentered 

8 under that permit’’; 

9 (2) by amending subsection (d)(1) to read as 

10 follows: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 592 IS

1 ‘‘(1) research and development to test design 

2 concepts, equipment, or operating techniques;’’; 

3 (3) in subsection (d)(3), by striking ‘‘prior to 

4 obtaining a license’’; 

5 (4) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘suborbital 

6 rocket design’’ and inserting ‘‘suborbital rocket or 

7 rocket design’’; and 

8 (5) by amending subsection (g) to read as fol9 lows: 

10 ‘‘(g) The Secretary may issue a permit under this sec11 tion notwithstanding any license issued under this chapter. 

12 The issuance of a license under this chapter may not inval13 idate a permit under this section.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2



             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Diacrin, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Kevin Kerrigan, Controller, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

	A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Diacrin, Inc., and will be retained by Diacrin, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 7, 2003                     /s/  Kevin Kerrigan
                                     ----------------------
                                           Kevin Kerrigan
                                           Controller
#### Florentino Zuniga COLIN; Iridia Virginia Colin Paredes, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-73296.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Maria Janossy, Esq., Law Offices of Maria Janossy, Glendale, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Gladys M. Steffens-Guzman, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

*764Florentino Zuniga Colin and Iridia Virginia Colin Paredes, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings and remand. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

The BIA abused its discretion by failing to adequately address new and material evidence regarding petitioners’ son’s special educational needs. *See Ordonez v. INS,*345 F.3d 777, 785 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that reopening is appropriate “where the new facts alleged, when coupled with the facts already of record, satisfy us that it would be worthwhile to develop the issues further at a plenary hearing on reopening”) (quoting *Matter of S-V-,*22 I. & N. Dec. 1306, 1308 (BIA 2000) (en banc)). We therefore grant the petition for review and remand for reconsideration of petitioners’ motion to reopen.

The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1686

KERRY LEE WAGAMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus GORDON R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:05-cv-02258-PJM) Submitted: May 11, 2007 Decided: June 11, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael J. Snider, Ari Taragin, Jeffery C. Taylor, SNIDER & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* Wagaman also challenges the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f) motion for a continu ance to conduct discovery. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Wagaman’s motion. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Kerry Lee Wagaman appeals the district court’s order that granted summary judgment in favor of his former employer in his civil action in which he alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Rehabilitation Act and retaliation. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. Summary judgment is appropriate only if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986). We have thoroughly reviewed the briefs and joint appendix, including the transcript of the summary judgment hearing, and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated on the record by the district court. See Wagaman v. England , No. 8:05-cv-02258-PJM (D. Md. May 17, 2006). We dispe nse with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials beforethe court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) / Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
 audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 383 Madison Avenue31st FloorNew York, New York 10179  RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-LC11 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-LC11 Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"): (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and (b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  March 1, 2016  /s/ Brian SmithBRIAN SMITHVice President   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42220-42221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18821]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 101101]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: ``Giovanni Bellini: Landscapes of Faith 
in Renaissance Venice'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Giovanni Bellini: Landscapes of Faith in Renaissance Venice,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The J. Paul Getty 
Museum at the Getty Center, Los Angeles, California, from on or about 
October 10, 2017, until on or about January 14, 2018, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the 
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#26554345524f49481412131f66555247524308414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b485e584f525455090f0e027b484f5a4f5e155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. Department 
of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of 
December 11,

[[Page 42221]]

2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

 Alyson Grunder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-18821 Filed 9-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-99-2017]


Approval of Subzone Status; MTD Consumer Group Inc., Martin, 
Tennessee

    On June 29, 2017, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Northwest 
Tennessee Regional Port Authority, grantee of FTZ 283, requesting 
subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 283, on 
behalf of MTD Consumer Group Inc., in Martin, Tennessee.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (82 FR 31044-31045, July 5, 2017). The FTZ staff examiner 
reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for 
approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board 
Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to 
establish Subzone 283A was approved on August 16, 2017, subject to the 
FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and 
further subject to FTZ 283's 2,000-acre activation limit.

    Dated: August 24, 2017.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-18437 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,310,547
<SECURITIES>                                29,671,874
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,035,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,788,140
<PP&E>                                       8,807,089
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,666,271)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,988,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,857,076
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       170,435
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,961,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,988,549
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,135,534
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,436,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,300,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,300,655)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>