alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32
 
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of OrthoLogic Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of John M. Holliman,
III, Executive Chairman and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Les
M. Taeger, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of his knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Date: May
7, 2009
 
 
 /s/ John M. Holliman,
III
 John M.
Holliman, III
 Executive
Chairman
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
 
 
 /s/ Les M.
Taeger
 Les M.
Taeger
 Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
   A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to OrthoLogic Corp. and will be retained by
OrthoLogic Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Health Fitness
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2002 (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Wesley W. Winnekins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
         78o(d)); and

     2.  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



/s/ Wesley W. Winnekins


Wesley W. Winnekins
Chief Financial Officer
Health Fitness Corporation
November 12, 2002
**Exhibit 31.1**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION  I, Steven C. Futrell, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Croghan Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrolsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usbyothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrolsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: July 26, 2005 /s/ Steven C. Futrell         Steven C. Futrell, President & CEO  
19
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


         The undersigned officer of DATATRAK International, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
            June 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements
            of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
            amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form
            10-Q.

Dated: August 13, 2003                              /s/ Jeffrey A. Green
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    Jeffrey A. Green
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1


   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                                      2002

     In  connection  with the  filing  of  Zunicom,  Inc.  and  Subsidiary  (the
"Company")  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),I,  William Tan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350,
as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

         (2)The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company,


/s/ William Tan
--------------------
William Tan
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)

August 13, 2007




























                                Exhibit 32.1 - 1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). A R / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T LE OPOLDO NEGRET E HERNA ND EZ , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E RJ r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73937 A ge nc yN o. A 074- 790- 819 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anuary11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L e opol do N e gr e t e H e rnande z , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or r e vi e w of

an or de rof

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s di s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l of an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f orc anc e l l a t i on of 

# FI LED JAN 22 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA R/ Res ea r ch 07- 73937 2 r e mo v a l . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v i e w d e n o v o c l a i ms o f du e p r o c e s s v io la tio n s in im m ig r a tio n p r o c e e d in g s . Ibarra-Flores v. G on zales , 4 3 9 F . 3 d6 1 4 , 6 2 0 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 6 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. N e g r e t e c o n t e n d s th e I Jv i o l a t e ddu e p r o c e s s b ye x c l u d i n g al e tt e rf r o m a d o c to rd e s c r ib in g th e e n v ir o n m e n ta l p o llu tio n in E c a te p e c , M e x ic o . C o n tr aryto N egre t e’ s c on t ent i on , the proceedi ng s w er e not“ so fund am ent al l y unfai r that[he] w as prevent ed fr om re as on abl y pre se nt i ng hi s c as e. ” Co lm e n a rv . I NS , 210 F . 3d 9 6 7 , 9 7 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( c ita tio n o m itte d ) . M o r e o v e r , N e g r e te f a ile dto de m ons tr a t e tha tc ons i de r a t i on of the l e tt e rm ayha ve a f

f e c t e d the out c om e of

the p r o c e e d in g s . Se e id . ( r e qu ir in g p r e ju d ic e to p r e v a il o n adu e p r o c e s s c h a lle n g e ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 22 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the definition of ‘‘waters of the 

United States’’ under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

4 Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection 

5 Agency relating to ‘‘Clean Water Rule: Definition of 

6 ‘Waters of the United States’ ’’ (80 Fed. Reg. 37054; 

7 June 29, 2015), and such rule shall have no force or ef8 fect. 

Passed the Senate November 4, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 22 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapthe Federal Water Pollution Control Act. definition of ‘‘waters of the United States’’ under vironmental Protection Agency relating to the submitted by the Corps of Engineers and the En- ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
#### Juvencio Salazar RAYA; Maria de Jesus Velazquez Trujillo, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-72339.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Nathan M. Zaslow, Esq., Law Office of Nathan M. Zaslow, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Edward J. Duffy, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice Civil, Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juvencio Salazar Raya and Maria de Jesus Velazquez Trujillo petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of discretion. *See Konstantinova v. INS,*195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir.1999). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA considered the new evidence regarding petitioners’ son Henry and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. *See Singh v. INS,*295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          18,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                       119
<INVENTORY>                                         38
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,710
<PP&E>                                          13,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,109
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,646
<SALES>                                         15,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,792
<CGS>                                            5,126
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,507
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (493)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,778
<INCOME-TAX>                                       703
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,075
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,075
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10236

Summary Calendar

NICHOLAS C. DANIELS; ROWENA DANIELS, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, also known as 

Freddie Mac, 

 Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CV-3129

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The property of Appellants was sold after foreclosure in 2011, and 

Appellants have sought judicial relief since – but always without success.

They filed in state court that year a case removed to federal court and 

dismissed in 2013 for failure to state a legal claim.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10236 Document: 00513243161 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
No. 15-10236

2

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation brought forcible detainer suit 

for possession of the property, which eventually disposed of Appellant’s claim. 

That state proceeding was interrupted when Appellants filed a suit that was 

resolved, again for failure to state a claim, by the Fifth Circuit in 2014, and 

then completed by the state court.

Regarding the present suit as an attempt to set aside the state court’s 

forcible detainer judgment, Appellants encounter the Rooker-Feldman rule. 

That is where the district court ended, and we must affirm that judgment.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-10236 Document: 00513243161 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aspect Medical
Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 28, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Nassib G. Chamoun, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  | /s/ Nassib G. Chamoun  
|                       |  |                        
|Dated: August 11, 2003 |  | Nassib G. Chamoun      
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Aspect Medical Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Aspect
Medical Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function


of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)









CERTIFICATION






I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2013-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association




Date:     June 26, 2015




By:/s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15265 and #15266; Tennessee Disaster Number TN-00106]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Tennessee dated August 23, 2017.
 DATES: Issued on 08/23/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/23/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/23/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. *Incident:*
                     Severe Thunderstorms with Damaging Winds. *Incident Period:*
                     05/27/2017 through 05/28/2017. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Shelby *Contiguous Counties:* Tennessee: Fayette, Tipton Arkansas: Crittenden Mississippi: Desoto, Marshall The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.875Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.938Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.430Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.215Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.215Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15265 B and for economic injury is 15266 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Tennessee, Arkansas, Mississippi. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: August 23, 2017. Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2017-18383 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P