41174 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 

position from 6 a.m. through 9 a.m. on 

September 9, 2017. Navigation on the 

waterway consists primarily of 

commercial tows and recreational 

watercraft. This temporary deviation has 

been coordinated with waterway users. 

No objections were received. 

The bridge will not be able to open for 

emergencies and there are no alternate 

routes for vessels transiting this section 

of the Upper Mississippi River. The 

Coast Guard will inform users of the 

waterways through our Local and 

Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the 

change in operating schedule for the 

bridge so the vessel operators can 

arrange their transits to minimize any 

impact caused by the temporary 

deviation. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the effective period of this 

temporary deviation. This deviation 

from the operating regulations is 

authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: August 25, 2017. 

Eric A. Washburn, 

Bridge Administrator, Western Rivers. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18406 Filed 8–29–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2017–0687] 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; St. 

Croix River, Stillwater, MN 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation 

from drawbridge regulations; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a 

deviation from the operating schedule 

that governs the Stillwater Highway 

Bridge across the St. Croix River, mile 

23.4, at Stillwater, Minnesota. This 

deviation will test a change to the 

drawbridge operation schedule to 

determine whether a permanent change 

to the schedule is needed. 

DATES: This deviation is effective 

without actual notice from August 30, 

2017 through 11:59 p.m. October 15, 

2017. For the purposes of enforcement, 

actual notice will be used from 8 a.m. 

on August 25, 2017, until August 30, 

2017. 

Comments and related material must 

reach the Coast Guard on or before 

November 28, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2017–0687 using Federal eRulemaking 

Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. 

See the ‘‘Public Participation and 

Request for Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this test 

deviation, call or email Eric A. 

Washburn, Bridge Administrator, 

Western Rivers, Coast Guard; telephone 

314–269–2378, email Eric.Washburn@

uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Stillwater Highway Bridge, across the 

St. Croix River, mile 23.4, at Stillwater, 

Minnesota, has been modified in its use 

from motorized vehicle traffic to 

pedestrian and bicycle use only. The 

existing operation schedule of the 

bridge is no longer necessary as it had 

been created solely to reduce the impact 

of drawspan openings on motorized 

vehicle traffic. This test deviation 

requires the bridge to open daily, every 

30 minutes from 8 a.m. until midnight, 

and upon two hours notice from 

midnight until 8 a.m. This test deviation 

is effective from 8 a.m. on August 25, 

2017 through 11:59 p.m. on October 15, 

2017. 

The Stillwater Highway Bridge 

currently operates in accordance with 

33 CFR 117.667(b). 

The Stillwater Highway Bridge 

provides a vertical clearance of 10.9 feet 

above normal pool in the closed-tonavigation position. Navigation on the 

waterway consists primarily of 

commercial sightseeing/dinner cruise 

boats and recreational watercraft and 

will not be significantly impacted. 

The Coast Guard will also inform the 

users of the waterways through our 

Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners 

of the change in operating schedule for 

the bridge so that vessel operators can 

arrange their transits to minimize any 

impact caused by the temporary 

deviation. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the effective period of this 

temporary deviation. This deviation 

from the operating regulations is 

authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We view public participation as 

essential to effective rulemaking, and 

will consider all comments and material 

received during the comment period. 

Your comment can help shape the 

outcome of this rulemaking. If you 

submit a comment, please include the 

docket number for this rulemaking, 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. 

We encourage you to submit 

comments through the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at http://

www.regulations.gov. If your material 

cannot be submitted using http://

www.regulations.gov, contact the person 

in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this document for 

alternate instructions. 

We accept anonymous comments. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http://

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Documents mentioned in this notice 

as being available in this docket and all 

public comments, will be in our online 

docket at http://www.regulations.gov 

and can be viewed by following that 

Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if 

you go to the online docket and sign up 

for email alerts, you will be notified 

when comments are posted or a final 

rule is published. 

Dated: August 25, 2017. 

Eric A. Washburn, 

Bridge Administrator, Western Rivers. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18443 Filed 8–29–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2017–0348] 

RIN 1625–AA–00 

Safety Zone; Wando River, Charleston, 

SC 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is extending 

the duration of a temporary safety zone 

for navigable waters of the Wando River 

within a 500-yard radius of the SC–41 

Bridge, vessels and machinery in 

Charleston, South Carolina. The safety 

zone is needed to ensure the safety of 

persons, vessels, and the marine 

environment from potential hazards 

created by demolition work on the SC– 

41 Bridge. Entry of vessels or persons 

into this zone is prohibited unless 

specifically authorized by the Captain of 

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 41175 

the Port Charleston or a designated 

representative. 

DATES: This rule is effective from 

August 30, 2017 through November 30, 

2017. 

ADDRESSES: To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to http://

www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017– 

0348 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rule. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule call or 

email Lieutenant Justin Heck, Sector 

Charleston Office of Waterways 

Management, Coast Guard; telephone 

(843) 740–3184, email Justin.C.Heck@

uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 

OMB Office of Management and Budget 

II. Background Information and 

Regulatory History 

The Coast Guard is issuing this 

temporary rule without prior notice and 

opportunity to comment pursuant to 

authority under section 4(a) of the 

Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 

U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision 

authorizes an agency to issue a rule 

without prior notice and opportunity to 

comment when the agency for good 

cause finds that those procedures are 

‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that 

good cause exists for not publishing a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

with respect to this rule because 

immediate action is needed to protect 

the public from the hazards associated 

with the demolition of the SC–41 

Bridge. On August 11, 2017, the Coast 

Guard published a temporary final rule, 

entitled ‘‘Safety Zone; Demolition of 

SC–41 Bridge, Wando River, Charleston, 

SC’’ in the Federal Register (82 FR 

37515) establishing a temporary safety 

zone for the demolition work on the SC– 

41 Bridge in Charleston, South Carolina. 

The safety zone is scheduled to expire 

on August 30, 2017, but the demolition 

company has requested additional time 

to complete the demolition work. This 

rule extends the duration of the existing 

safety zone from August 30, 2017 to 

November 30, 2017 to ensure, to the 

extent practicable, that there continues 

to be protections for the safety of 

personnel, vessels, and the marine 

environment from the potential hazards 

created by the demolition work on the 

SC–41 Bridge, which was unable to be 

completed during the original time 

frame. It would be impracticable and 

contrary to the public interest for the 

existing safety zone to lapse when the 

demolition work needs to continue past 

the expiration date of the existing safety 

zone. 

We are issuing this rule, and under 5 

U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds 

that good cause exists for making it 

effective less than 30 days after 

publication in the Federal Register. 

Delaying the effective date of this rule 

would be contrary to public interest 

because immediate action is needed to 

respond to the potential safety hazards 

associated with the demolition work on 

the SC–41 Bridge. 

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule 

The Coast Guard is issuing this rule 

under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. On 

August 11, 2017, the Coast Guard 

published a temporary final rule, 

entitled ‘‘Safety Zone; Demolition of 

SC–41 Bridge, Wando River, Charleston, 

SC’’ in the Federal Register (82 FR 

37515) establishing a temporary safety 

zone for the demolition work on the SC– 

41 Bridge in Charleston, South Carolina. 

The safety zone is scheduled to expire 

on August 30, 2017, but the demolition 

company has requested additional time 

to complete the demolition work. The 

Captain of the Port (COTP) Charleston 

has determined that potential hazards 

associated with the bridge demolition 

will be a safety concern for anyone 

within a 500-yard radius of the bridge, 

vessels, and machinery. Through this 

rule, the COTP Charleston has 

determined it necessary to extend the 

duration of the safety zone from August 

30, 2017 until November 30, 2017 

because the safety zone is needed to 

protect personnel, vessels, and the 

marine environment in the navigable 

waters within the safety zone while the 

demolition is in progress. 

IV. Discussion of the Rule 

This rule extends the duration of the 

temporary safety zone on the waters of 

the Wando River in Charleston, South 

Carolina during the SC–41 bridge 

demolition. The company conducting 

the demolition contacted the Coast 

Guard asking for more time to complete 

the demolition. The demolition will 

take over two separate demolition 

periods between August 31, 2017 and 

November 30, 2017, during which the 

safety zone will be enforced for 

approximately six hours each. The 

safety zone will cover all navigable 

waters within 500 yards of the bridge, 

vessels, and machinery being used for 

the demolition of the SC–41 Bridge. No 

vessel or person will be permitted to 

enter, transit through, anchor in, or 

remain within the safety zone without 

obtaining permission from the Captain 

of the Port Charleston or a designated 

representative. If authorization to enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

within the safety zone is granted by the 

Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative, all persons 

and vessels receiving such authorization 

must comply with the instructions of 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative. The Coast 

Guard will provide notice of the safety 

zone by Local Notice to Mariners, 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and onscene designated representatives. 

V. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

Executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes and 

Executive orders, and we discuss First 

Amendment rights of protestors. 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess the costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

Executive Order 13771 directs agencies 

to control regulatory costs through a 

budgeting process. This rule has not 

been designated a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action,’’ under Executive 

Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has 

not been reviewed by the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), and 

pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 

from the requirements of Executive 

Order 13771. 

This regulatory action determination 

is based on the following reasons: (1) 

The safety zone will only be enforced 

for a total of twelve hours; (2) although 

persons and vessels may not enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

within the safety zone without 

authorization from the Captain of the 

Port Charleston or a designated 

representative, they may operate in the 

surrounding area during the 

enforcement period; and (3) the Coast 

Guard will provide advance notification 

of the safety zone to the local maritime 

community by Local Notice to Mariners 

and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

41176 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 

B. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 

1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires Federal agencies to consider 

the potential impact of regulations on 

small entities during rulemaking. The 

term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

While some owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit the safety 

zone may be small entities, for the 

reasons stated in section V.A above, this 

rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on any vessel owner 

or operator. 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule. If the rule 

would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 

1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). 

The Coast Guard will not retaliate 

against small entities that question or 

complain about this rule or any policy 

or action of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. If you 

believe this rule has implications for 

federalism or Indian tribes, please 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 

above. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves a safety 

zone that will prohibit persons and 

vessels from entering, transiting 

through, anchoring in, or remaining 

within a limited area surrounding the 

SC–41 Bridge on the waters of the 

Wando River for two six hour periods. 

This rule is categorically excluded from 

further review under paragraph 34(g) of 

Figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. An environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

and a Record of Environmental 

Consideration are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; and 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170. 

■ 2. Revise § 165.T07–0348 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T07–0348 Safety Zone; Demolition 

SC–41 Bridge Demolition Phase Two, 

Wando River, Charleston, SC. 

(a) Location. All waters of the Wando 

River encompassed within a 500-yard 

radius of the SC–41 Bridge, vessels and 

machinery. 

(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated 

representative’’ means Coast Guard 

Patrol Commanders, including Coast 

Guard coxswains, petty officers, and 

other officers operating Coast Guard 

vessels, and Federal, state, and local 

officers designated by or assisting the 

Captain of the Port Charleston in the 

enforcement of the regulated areas. 

(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and 

vessels are prohibited from entering, 

transiting through, anchoring in, or 

remaining within the regulated area 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port Charleston or a designated 

representative. 

(2) Persons and vessels desiring to 

enter, transit through, anchor in, or 

remain within the regulated area may 

contact the Captain of the Port 

Charleston by telephone at (843) 740– 

7050, or a designated representative via 

VHF radio on channel 16, to request 

authorization. If authorization to enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

within the regulated area is granted by 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative, all persons 

and vessels receiving such authorization 

must comply with the instructions of 

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 41177 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative. 

(3) The Coast Guard will provide 

notice of the regulated area by Local 

Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, and on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Enforcement period. This rule will 

be enforced from August 4, 2017 

through November 30, 2017, during 

demolition activity. 

Dated: August 25, 2017. 

G.G. Stump, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Charleston. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18432 Filed 8–29–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

50 CFR Part 13 

[Docket No. FWS–R9–MB–2011–0094; 

FF09M20300–167–FXMB123109EAGLE] 

RIN 1018–AY30 

Eagle Permits; Revisions to 

Regulations for Eagle Incidental Take 

and Take of Eagle Nests; Correction 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Correcting amendments. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, published a final rule 

to revise our regulations regarding 

permits that we issue for certain 

activities involving eagles. In that final 

rule, we revised the permit application 

fees for certain eagle permits. These 

permits are included in a table of permit 

application fees for numerous Service 

programs. Because of a formatting error 

in the rule, the revisions to the fee table 

were not incorporated into the Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR) as intended. 

With this document, we correct the 

formatting error to properly reflect 

current application fees for eagle 

permits in the CFR and also remove two 

entries in the fee table pertaining to 

permits that no longer exist. This rule is 

purely an administrative action and 

does not affect the provisions of the 

original rule in any substantive way. 

DATES: This correction is effective 

August 30, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Wilkinson, Division of Policy, 

Performance, and Management 

Programs; 703–358–2506. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 16, 2016, the U.S. Fish 

and Wildlife Service published a final 

rule (81 FR 91494) to revise the 

regulations in title 50 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR) authorizing 

certain activities involving eagles. These 

regulations are in parts 13 and 22 of title 

50. While the majority of the changes in 

the rule were to the regulations in part 

22, we also revised application fees 

associated with some part 22 eagle 

permits and the administration fee for 

eagle permits over 5 years and 

incorporated those changes into the 

permit fee table at 50 CFR 13.11(d)(4), 

which sets forth user fees for permits 

issued by several Service programs. 

The amendatory instruction that 

published in that final rule to revise the 

table in 50 CFR 13.11(d)(4) would have 

reduced the number of columns in the 

table from five to four. Because one 

column (the ‘‘Administration fee’’ 

column) had an entry for only one type 

of permit, we intended to remove that 

column and insert the information 

regarding the administration fee for that 

permit as a footnote to the table. While 

the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) 

allowed the final rule to be published 

with that instruction, upon reviewing 

the rule for codification into the Code of 

Federal Regulations, OFR decided that 

the amendatory instruction removing 

the Administration fee column was 

inappropriate. Instead of revising the 

table as we intended, OFR left the table 

unchanged and instead included this 

footnote to the table in 50 CFR 

13.11(d)(4): ‘‘Editorial Note: At 81 FR 

91549, Dec. 16, 2016, § 13.11 was 

amended; however, the amendment 

could not be incorporated due to 

inaccurate amendatory instruction.’’ 

This rule corrects the amendatory 

instruction in the December 16, 2016, 

final rule (81 FR 91494), so that the CFR 

properly incorporates all the revisions 

made by that rule. 

We are also taking this opportunity to 

correct two longstanding errors in the 

table at § 13.11(d)(4). In the section 

‘‘Migratory Bird Treaty Act’’ is an entry 

for ‘‘Falconry,’’ and in the section ‘‘Bald 

and Golden Eagle Protection Act’’ is an 

entry for ‘‘Eagle falconry.’’ We are 

removing both of these entries from the 

table as they remain there in error: They 

should have been removed via a former 

rulemaking action. On October 8, 2008, 

we published a final rule (73 FR 59448) 

that revised the regulations pertaining to 

falconry. In that rule, we stated that 

Federal permitting for falconry would 

cease as of January 1, 2014, and, as of 

that date, States, territories, and Tribes 

would be responsible for issuing 

falconry permits. The rule revised 

pertinent sections of 50 CFR parts 21 

and 22 but failed to make the necessary 

corresponding changes to the fee table 

in part 13. Accordingly, since we no 

longer issue Federal permits for 

falconry, we hereby remove two entries 

regarding application fees for falconry 

permits from the table in § 13.11(d)(4). 

Authority: We issue this final rule under 

the authority of the Bald and Golden Eagle 

Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668–668d). 

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 13 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Exports, Fish, Imports, 

Plants, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Transportation, Wildlife. 

Regulation Promulgation 

For the reasons described in the 

preamble, we hereby amend subchapter 

B of chapter I, title 50 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations, as set forth below: 

PART 13—GENERAL PERMIT 

PROCEDURES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 13 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 668a, 704, 712, 742j– 

l, 1374(g), 1382, 1538(d), 1539, 1540(f), 3374, 

4901–4916; 18 U.S.C. 42; 19 U.S.C. 1202; 31 

U.S.C. 9701. 

■ 2. Amend the table in § 13.11(d)(4) by: 

■ a. Removing the entry ‘‘Falconry’’ 

under the section ‘‘Migratory Bird 

Treaty Act’’; and 

■ b. Revising the section ‘‘Bald and 

Golden Eagle Protection Act’’ and 

footnote 1 to read as follows: 

§ 13.11 Application procedures. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * 

(4) * * *