alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 940 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to study the feasibility of providing 

certain taxpayers with an optional, pre-prepared tax return, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 15, 2015 

Mrs. SHAHEEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to study the feasibility of providing certain taxpayers with an optional, 

pre-prepared tax return, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Simpler Tax Filing 

5 Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

7 It is the sense of Congress that— 

8 (1) the Secretary of the Treasury should pro9 vide as many taxpayers as possible with the option 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 940 IS

1 of receiving a tax return that is pre-prepared by the 

2 Secretary of the Treasury; and 

3 (2) it should be the goal of the Internal Rev4 enue Service to begin offering pre-prepared returns 

5 to filers by tax year 2020. 

6 SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS. 

7 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

8 of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation 

9 with the Taxpayer Advocate Service, shall provide a report 

10 to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of 

11 Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the 

12 Senate on actions necessary to achieve the goal of offering 

13 pre-prepared tax returns to filers by tax year 2020, includ14 ing— 

15 (1) changes necessary to the filing deadlines for 

16 employers and institutions for information provided 

17 through Forms W–2 and 1099; 

18 (2) actions necessary to expedite processing of 

19 information from Form W–2 by the Social Security 

20 Administration; 

21 (3) actions necessary to expedite processing of 

22 information reporting by the Internal Revenue Serv23 ice; 

24 (4) actions to help businesses submit Form W– 

25 2 more easily, and electronically; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 940 IS

1 (5) partnerships with employers and financial 

2 institutions to encourage early reporting; 

3 (6) delaying the start of the tax filing season; 

4 (7) ensuring that taxpayers have access to se5 cure online accounts to access their information, 

6 while also having the option to download their infor7 mation for integration into private tax preparation 

8 software; and 

9 (8) incorporating best practices from other 

10 countries for expediting the availability of return in11 formation. 

12 Such report shall also include an analysis of the budg13 etary, administrative, and legislative barriers to achieving 

14 this goal, including the amount of appropriations that 

15 would be required. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-15-00368- CV Laura Pr essley, Appellant

v. Gr egorio “G reg” C asar, Appellee NO. 03-15-00505- CV David Rogers, Appellant

v. Gr egorio “G reg” C asar, Appellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 201 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-0 5-0 0374 , H ONO RAB LE DANIEL H . M ILLS, J UDGE P RESIDING O R D E R P E R C U R I A M

Appellant David Roge rs has filed an unopposed motion to consolidate the appeal s in the above cause numbers. Both appea ls c oncer n the same cause s of action, statutes, and fac tual matters, and both cau s es wer e considere d toge ther befor e the trial court. We there fore g rant appellant Roge rs’ unopposed motion to consolidate the cause s for pur poses of consideration; bothcause nu m b ers will continue, and the merits of the appea ls will be considere d toge ther. Be cause

Cause No. 03-15-00368- CV has been dockete d as acc eler ated, both cause numbers will proce ed as acc eler ated acc ording to the deadlines s et forth for acc eler ated appea ls in the Texas Rules of Appellate Proc edure .

It is ordere d September 17, 2015. Be fore Justices Puryear , Pemberton, and G oodwin

2
#### Cheryl K. CROWE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent.

No. 2008-3056.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 21, 2007.

Cheryl K. Crowe, pro se.

ORDER

Petitioner having paid the required filing fee and having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is,

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

Petitioner should compute the due date for filing its brief 21 days from the date of filing of this order.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-99-2017]

On June 29, 2017, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Northwest Tennessee Regional Port Authority, grantee of FTZ 283, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 283, on behalf of MTD Consumer Group Inc., in Martin, Tennessee.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (82 FR 31044-31045, July 5, 2017). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 283A was approved on August 16, 2017, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 283's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: August 24, 2017.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-18437 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 10.3

 

	
       FIAT
    	
 
    	
 
    	
   CNH CAPITAL
    
	
INDUSTRIAL
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
STRATEGIC ACCOUNTS GROUP
    


 

Nicholas C. Mast

Director

Strategic Accounts

 

September 30, 2011

 

Titan Machinery, Inc.

644 E. Beaton Dr.

West Fargo, ND  58078

 

Attn:  Ted O. Christianson,

Vice President, Finance

 

via electronic mail

 

Dear Mr. Christianson:

 

Titan Machinery, Inc. (“Titan”) and CNH Capital America LLC (“CNH”) are parties to an Amended and Restated Wholesale Floor Plan Credit Facility and Security Agreement dated November 13, 2007, as amended from time to time, most recently amended in a letter dated June 30, 2010 (the “Agreement”).  The Agreement provides that, among other things, the rate of interest charged on credit facilities, provided by CNH, shall be the standard CNH rates, with the exception of credit line 1 (new units), credit line 2 (trade-in units), credit line 6 (matured used units), credit line 7 (matured new units), credit line 8 (lease return/repo units), which shall have an interest rate of Prime +4.00%, and credit line 11 (premier rental line) which will have interest charged according to the pay plans in place from time to time.

 

By executing this letter agreement, the parties wish to further amend the terms of the Agreement as follows:  a) Prime +4% shall continue to be the interest rate applicable for the credit lines 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8, under the Agreement; b) the interest rate for credit line 11 shall continue to be according to the pay plans in place from time to time; c) all other credit facilities will remain according to CNH’s standard rates of interest; d) CNH Capital will review interest rates under the Agreement periodically; and e) CNH Capital shall provide Titan 30 days prior notice of any change in interest rates; provided, however, all interest rates shall be subject to the standard rate of default interest for all credit facilities, as set forth in the Agreement, upon any applicable event of default.

 

Except as specifically amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.

 

CNH Capital

233 Lake Avenue

Racine, WI 53403

 











 

Very truly yours,

 

CNH Capital America LLC

 

 

	
/s/ Nicholas Mast
    	
 
    
	
Nicholas Mast Director Strategic Accounts
    	
 
    


 

Titan Machinery, Inc. agrees to the above described amendment to the Amended and Restated Wholesale Floor Plan Credit Facility and Security Agreement dated November 13, 2007, as amended.

 

Titan Machinery, Inc.

 

 

	
/s/ Ted O. Christianson
    	
 
    
	
Ted O. Christianson, VP Finance and Treasurer
    	
 
    


 

CNH Capital

233 Lake Avenue

Racine, WI 53403
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 942 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a deduction from 

the gift tax for gifts made to certain exempt organizations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 15, 2015 

Mr. PORTMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a deduction from the gift tax for gifts made to certain 

exempt organizations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Treatment for 

5 All Gifts Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FROM GIFT TAX FOR GIFTS MADE TO 

7 CERTAIN EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2522(a) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the period 

10 at the end of paragraph (4) and inserting a semicolon and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 942 IS

1 by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new para2 graph: 

3 ‘‘(5) an organization described in paragraph 

4 (4), (5), or (6) of section 501(c) and exempt from 

5 tax under section 501(a).’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply to gifts made after the date of 

8 the enactment of this Act. 

9 (c) NO INFERENCE.—Nothing in the amendments 

10 made by subsection (a) shall be construed to create any 

11 inference with respect to whether any transfer of property 

12 (whether made before, on, or after the date of the enact13 ment of this Act) to an organization described in para14 graph (4), (5), or (6) of section 501(c) of the Internal 

15 Revenue Code of 1986 is a transfer of property by gift 

16 for purposes of chapter 12 of such Code. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States

District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

___________

No. 95-2058

___________

William H. Whetstine, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 * Appeal from the United States

Walter Saur; Barbara Binnie; * District Court for the

Robert A. Jackson; JoAnne C. * Southern District of Iowa.

Lawrence; Kittie D. *

Weston-Knauer; Sally Chandler * [UNPUBLISHED]

Halford; Steven Wolmutt, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: January 30, 1996

 Filed: February 21, 1996 ___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

 William H. Whetstine, an Iowa inmate, appeals the district

court's1 adverse judgment following a bench trial in Whetstine's 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action. We conclude the district court's judgment

for defendants was correct, and that an extended discussion is not

warranted. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. DARLENE M IC HELLE STUR DEVANT, De fe nda nt-Appe l la

nt. No. 21-35329

D.C . Nos. 3:20-c v-01909-JO

3:18-c r-00223-JO-1
M EM O R ANDUM *

UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. DARLENE M IC HELLE STUR DEVANT, De fe nda nt-Appe l la

nt. No. 21-35330

D.C . Nos. 3:20-c v-01910-JO

3:19-c r-00254-JO-1

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ore gon R obe rt E. Jone s, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding 

# FIL ED MAR 11 2022 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.Subm itte d M arc h 9, 2022 ** Portla nd, Ore gon B e fore : GR

AB E R and B E A, C irc uit Judge s, a nd REISS, * * * Distric t Judge
. Pe titione r Darle ne Sturde va nt a p pe a ls the distric t c ourt’ s de nia l of he r pe tition for ha

be a s c orpus brought pursua nt to 28 U.S.C .§ 2255. Re vie wing the distric t c o urt’ s de n ia l de novo, Unite d State s v. C ha c on-Pa lom are s, 208 F.3d 1157, 1158 (9th C ir. 2000), we a ffirm
. 1. Pe titione r, in he r ple a

a gre e m e nts, a

ppe ars to ha

ve wa ive d

he r right to
atta c k he r se nte nc e c olla

te ra lly . B ut e ve n if she ha s not wa ive d tha t right, he r
c ha lle nge fa ils. Pe titione r’ s a rgum e nt re ga

rding he r c are e r offe nde r status is fore c lose d by

binding pre c e de nt. Unite d State s v. C rum , 934 F.3d 963, 964, 967 (9th C ir. 2019) (pe r c uriam ), holds tha t a c onvic tion for de live ry

of
m e tha m phe tam ine unde r Ore g on R e vise d Statute se c tion 475.890 qua lifie s a s a
c ontrolle d substa

nc e offe nse for se nte nc ing purpose s. 2. Pe titione r’ s c l a im

of ine ffe c tive a ssista

nc e of c ounse l, the re fore , fa ils a s
we ll. He r la

wy e r’ s fa ilure to ra ise an a rgum e nt tha

t wa s fore c lose d by

binding c a se

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).

* * * The Honora

ble C hristina

R e iss, Unite d Stat e s Distric t Judge for the Distric t of Ve rm o nt, sitting by de signa tion. 2la

w doe s not sa

tisfy e ithe r prong of the te st e sta blishe d by Stric kla

n d v. W a shington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). See R upe v. W ood, 93 F.3d 1434, 1445 (9th C ir. 1996) (noting tha t “ the fa ilure to ta

k e a futile a c tion c an ne ve r be de fic ie nt pe rform a nc e ” ). AFFIRM E D

3
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17666]

[[Page 39875]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Neurological Sciences Training Initial Review 
Group; NST-1 Subcommittee.
    Date: September 25-26, 2017.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Wyndham Grand Chicago Riverfront, 71 East Wacker Drive, 
Chicago, IL 60601.
    Contact Person: William Benzing, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience 
Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3204, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9529, (301) 496-4056, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 15, 2017.
Sylvia L. Neal,
 Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-17666 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
Exhibit 11.0 -  Computation of Earnings per Share

The following represents the computation of earnings per share reflecting the
assumption that the granted shares under the option and warrants plan which
would be dilutive will be exercised.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      Three Months Ended
                                                                                           March 31,
                                                                                   -------------------------
                                                                                       2003          2002
                                                                                   -----------   -----------
<S>                                                                                <C>           <C>
Net earnings - basic and diluted                                                   $   267,980   $   787,321
                                                                                   ===========   ===========
Weighted average common shares outstanding                                          12,308,321    12,265,250
Common share equivalents relating to stock
options, warrants                                                                       95,991       131,641
                                                                                   -----------   -----------
Adjusted common and common equivalent
shares for diluted computation                                                      12,404,312    12,396,891
                                                                                   ===========   ===========
Net earnings per share:
    Basic                                                                          $      0.02   $      0.06
    Diluted                                                                        $      0.02   $      0.06
                                                                                   ===========   ===========
Anti-dilutive options and warrants not
included in the diluted earnings per share
computations                                                                         1,161,234       693,527
                                                                                   ===========   ===========

See notes to consolidated financial statements

</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 44 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 910 

[Report No. 114–21] 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the special rules 

for accident and health plans of certain governmental entities, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2015 

Mr. HATCH, from the Committee on Finance, reported the following original 

bill; which was read twice and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

the special rules for accident and health plans of certain 

governmental entities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF SPECIAL RULE FOR CER4 TAIN GOVERNMENTAL PLANS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 105(j) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 910 PCS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘the taxpayer’’ and inserting ‘‘a 

2 qualified taxpayer’’, and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘deceased plan participant’s 

4 beneficiary’’ and inserting ‘‘deceased employee’s ben5 eficiary (other than an individual described in para6 graph (3)(B))’’. 

7 (b) QUALIFIED TAXPAYER.—Subsection (j) of section 

8 105 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 

9 adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(3) QUALIFIED TAXPAYER.—For purposes of 

11 paragraph (1), with respect to an accident or health 

12 plan described in paragraph (2), the term ‘qualified 

13 taxpayer’ means a taxpayer who is— 

14 ‘‘(A) an employee, or 

15 ‘‘(B) the spouse, dependent (as defined for 

16 purposes of subsection (b)), or child (as defined 

17 for purposes of such subsection) of an em18 ployee.’’. 

19 (c) APPLICATION TO POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF

20 STATES.—Paragraph (2) of section 105(j) of the Internal 

21 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

22 (1) by inserting ‘‘or established by or on behalf 

23 of a State or political subdivision thereof’’ after 

24 ‘‘public retirement system’’, and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 910 PCS

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘or 501(c)(9)’’ after ‘‘section 

2 115’’ in subparagraph (B). 

3 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to payments after the date of the 

5 enactment of this Act. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CONTINUOUS LEVY FOR MEDICARE 

7 PROVIDERS AND SUPPLIERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 6331(h) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik10 ing ‘‘30 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘35 percent’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to payments made after 180 days 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 44 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 910 

[Report No. 114–21] 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

other purposes. plans of certain governmental entities, and for clarify the special rules for accident and health 

APRIL 14, 2015 

Read twice and placed on the calendar 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Volunteer rates by educational attainment, persons 
25 years and over, September 2007 (percent)


				       Percent	

Less than a high school diploma		 9.0	
High school graduate, no college	18.6	
Some college or associate degree	30.7	
College graduates			41.8