alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DAISYTEK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,080
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,573
<INVENTORY>                                     73,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,126
<PP&E>                                          22,397
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,829
<BONDS>                                         30,879
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            68
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,182
<SALES>                                        172,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,812
<CGS>                                          155,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   391
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,204
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,375
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ANTHONY CHAMBERS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-1172

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 18, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota

County; Stephen M. Walker, Judge.

Anthony Chambers, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and C. Todd Chapman, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
1 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________ No. 10-2553

____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. NAEEM COTTON, Appellant

____________ APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY (D.C. Crim. No. 1-09-cr-00563-001) District Judge: Honorable Renee M. Bumb

____________ Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) February 9, 2011 Before: JORDAN, GREENAWAY, JR. and WEIS, Circuit Judges

. (Filed: February 28, 2011)

____________ OPINION

____________ WEIS, Circuit Judge

. Defendant pleaded guilty to a one-count indictment charging him with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Finding that the gun had been stolen, the District Court added an enhancement under2 U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4)(A). The resulting Guidelines range was 92 to 115 months, based on a total offense level of 23 and Criminal History Category VI. The District Court sentenced defendant to a 105-month term of imprisonment. On appeal, defendant vigorously argues that there was inadequate proof that the firearm had, in fact, been stolen. We are not persuaded that the District Court’s finding on this point was clearly erroneous. See United States v. Sanchez , 507 F.3d 532, 538-39 (7th Cir. 2007) (affirming two-level sentence enhancement based upon police report of stolen firearm, where other indicia of reliability were present); see also United States v. Bates , 584 F.3d 1105, 1108-10 (8th Cir. 2009) (same, where, in absence of police report, district court relied upon testimony of gun’s prior owner as to circumstances of its theft). In addition, the District Court stated that, even if it “had . . . not assessed the two point adjustment for . . . the firearm being stolen, [it] nonetheless would have varied upward to the [105-month] senten ce” based on the § 3553(a) factors. See, e.g. , United States v. Smalley , 517 F.3d 208, 214 n.6 (3d Cir. 2008) (“[I]f a district court wishes to provide for the possibility that a different Guidelines calculation applies by handing down an alternative sentence, it must still begin by determining the correct alternative Guidelines range and properly justify the chosen sentence”). Defense counsel presented a lengthy and thoughtful argument on behalf of his client. The record before us reflects the District Court’s considered and extensive3 analysis of the § 3553(a) factors. We find no significant procedural or substantive error in the sentencing and, therefore, defer “‘to the . . . determination that the § 3553(a) factors, on a whole,’ justify the sentence.” United States v. Tomko , 562 F.3d 558, 568 (3d Cir. 2009) (citation omitted). Accordingly, we will affirm the Judgment of the District Court.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1
 LETTER OF INCENTIVE OPTION GRANT  ORTHOLOGIC CORP. 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 Date
 Name & address
  
   1. Grant of Option  shares purchase
price of $  per Share. option is   (hereinafter referred to as the Option Date).
  2. Exercise Term of Option




---



##### 



Number of Shares
    
    Vesting Schedule
 3. Nontransferability.
 4. Other Conditions and Limitations.
 (a)
    
    Any Shares issued upon exercise of this option shall not be
issued unless the issuance and delivery of Shares pursuant thereto shall comply
with all relevant provisions of law including, without limitation, the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, any applicable state
securities or Blue Sky law or laws (or an exemption from such provision is
available), and the requirements of any stock exchange or national market
system of a national securities association upon which the Shares may then be
listed and shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company
with respect to such compliance.(b)
    
    No transfer of any Shares issued upon the exercise of the
option will be permitted by the Company, unless any request for transfer is
accompanied by evidence satisfactory to the Company that the proposed transfer
will not result in a violation of any applicable law, rule or regulation,
whether federal or state, including in the discretion of the Company an opinion
of counsel reasonably acceptable to the Company.(c)
    
    Inability of the Company to obtain approval from any regulatory
body having jurisdictional authority deemed by the Companys counsel to be
necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder shall relieve
the Company of any liability in respect to the nonissuance or sale of such
Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained.(d)
    
    Unless the Shares are subject to a then effective registration
statement under the Securities Act of 1933, upon exercise of this option (in
whole or in part) and the issuance of the Shares, the Company shall instruct
its transfer agent to enter stop transfer orders with respect to Shares, and
all certificates representing the Shares shall bear on the face thereof
substantially the following legend:




---



##### 



5. Exercise of Option
 
  6. Valuation and Withholding
 7. Termination of Incentive Stock Option




---



##### 



8. Notice of Disposition of Shares.
 9. Miscellaneous.
 10. Governing Law.
 11. Relationship to the 2005 Plan
 12. Communication




---



##### 



Very truly yours,OrthoLogic Corp.By:
    
    John M. Holliman, IIIExecutive ChairmanACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:Name:Date:
Labor force participation rate of workers 65 and over, 1948-2007


	      Percent	
		
Year	 Total, 65 and older	

1948		27.0	
1949		27.3	
1950		26.7	
1951		25.8	
1952		24.8	
1953		24.8	
1954		23.9	
1955		24.1	
1956		24.3	
1957		22.9	
1958		21.8	
1959		21.1	
1960		20.8	
1961		20.1	
1962		19.1	
1963		17.9	
1964		18.0	
1965		17.8	
1966		17.2	
1967		17.2	
1968		17.2	
1969		17.3	
1970		17.0	
1971		16.2	
1972		15.6	
1973		14.6	
1974		14.0	
1975		13.7	
1976		13.1	
1977		13.0	
1978		13.3	
1979		13.1	
1980		12.5	
1981		12.2	
1982		11.9	
1983		11.7	
1984		11.1	
1985		10.8	
1986		10.9	
1987		11.1	
1988		11.5	
1989		11.8	
1990		11.8	
1991		11.5	
1992		11.5	
1993		11.2	
1994		12.4	
1995		12.1	
1996		12.1	
1997		12.2	
1998		11.9	
1999		12.3	
2000		12.9	
2001		13.0	
2002		13.2	
2003		14.0	
2004		14.4	
2005		15.1	
2006		15.4	
2007		16.0
confidential









ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that
certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 6, 2013, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor,
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, CITIBANK, N.A.,
as Certificate Administrator and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2013-375P (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned
in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 12.7 of
this Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer, has fulfilled all of its
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th
day of February 2019.





Daniel
Marthinsen

Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank







confidential
(logo) GREYSTONE

 

C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLCd/b/a

GREYSTONE SPECIAL SERVICING

5221 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite800

Irving, Texas 75039

Phone: 972-868-5300

Fax: 972-868-5303

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,Vice President of C-III Asset Management LLC, the current Special Servicerunder that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013,relating to the **J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-LC11,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-LC11** (the“Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.  a review of theactivities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement during the calendar year 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) hasbeen made under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2.  to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2020, I have hereuntosigned my name.

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, Vice President
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 26, 2013 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-10-00461-CV
V3 GLOBAL, INC., SAMEER MOHAN, AND S.K. MOHAN, Appellants V. TOUCH TELL, INC. D/ B/A TOUCH TELL COMM UNICATIONS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 05-01575-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justi ce FitzGerald, and Justice Lewis Opinion Per Curiam On its own motion, the Court REINSTATES this case. The Court has before it the
parties’ June 27, 2013 joint motion to dismiss appeal. The Court GRANTS the motion and

DISMISSES the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a).

PER CURIAM

100461F.P05–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

V3 GLOBAL, INC., SAMEER MOHAN, AND S.K. MOHAN, Appellants

No. 05-10-00461-CV V.
TOUCH TELL, INC. D/B/A TOUCH TELL COMMUNICATIONS, Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 05-01575-B. Opinion delivered per curiam. Chief Justice Wright, Justice FitzGerald and Justice Lewis sitting for the Court.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee TOUCH TELL, INC. D/B/A TOUCH TELL COMMUNICATIONS recover its costs of this appeal from appellant s V3 GLOBAL, INC., SAMEER MOHAN, AND S.K. MOHAN, unless the parties have agreed otherwise.

Judgment entered July 26, 2013

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§1350,


AS
      ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Rex T. Clevenger, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1) The
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Rex
      T. Clevenger


Rex
      T.
      Clevenger


Senior
      Vice President &


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      8,
      2006




29
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1545

CYNTHIA C. WILLIAMSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, d/b/a Progress Energy 

Carolinas, Inc., a/k/a Progress Energy, Inc.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:10-cv-00258-BO)

Submitted: October 1, 2012 Decided: November 2, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sandra J. Polin, LAW OFFICE OF SANDRA J. POLIN, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. J. Travis Hockaday, Zebulon D. 

Anderson, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, 

L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cynthia C. Williamson appeals the district court’s 

order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant on her 

action alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. 

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2012). We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Williamson v. 

Carolina Power & Light Co., No. 5:10-cv-00258-BO (E.D.N.C. 

Mar. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 21 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 21

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 13, 2015

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony to commemorate the 150th Anniversary of the ratification 
                         of the 13th Amendment.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO COMMEMORATE THE 
              150TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE RATIFICATION OF THE 13TH 
              AMENDMENT.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on December 8, 2015, for a ceremony to 
commemorate the 150th Anniversary of the ratification of the 13th 
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which abolished 
slavery in the United States.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the Senate October 8, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Health Fitness Corporation (the“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon August 14, 2007 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Wesley W. Winnekins, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                      /s/ Wesley W. Winnekins
IIA 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 38 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule relating to the extent to which employers 

may use incentives to encourage employees to participate in wellness 

programs that ask the employees to respond to disability-related inquiries 

or undergo medical examinations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2016 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. PERDUE) 

introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule relating to the 

extent to which employers may use incentives to encourage employees to participate in wellness programs that 

ask the employees to respond to disability-related inquiries or undergo medical examinations. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

4 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating to 

5 the extent to which employers may use incentives to enVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:57 Jul 15, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ38.IS SJ38

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 38 IS 

1 courage employees to participate in wellness programs 

2 that ask the employees to respond to disability-related in3 quiries or undergo medical examinations under title I of 

4 the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 

5 12111 et seq.) (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 31126 (May 

6 17, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 13.1







CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Evogene Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ofer Haviv, do certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Ofer Haviv


Ofer Haviv


President and Chief Executive Officer





Date: April 8, 2014
#### Bettie A. BROWN, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 2008-3023.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 4, 2008.

Bettie A. Brown, pro se.

ORDER

Petitioner having paid the initial filing fee, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


	In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Diacrin,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Thomas H. Fraser, President and Chief Executive Officer,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

	(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

	A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Diacrin, Inc., and will be retained by Diacrin, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


Date: July 30, 2003                            /s/  Thomas H. Fraser
                                               ---------------------
                                                    Thomas H. Fraser
                                                    President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer