114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 38 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas the Cold War years cemented the close friendship 

between the United States and Taiwan, with Taiwan as 

an anti-Communist ally in the Asia-Pacific; 

Whereas United States economic aid prevented Taiwan from 

sliding into an economic depression in the 1950s and 

greatly contributed to the island’s later economic takeoff; 

Whereas Taiwan has flourished to become a beacon of democracy in Asia and leading trade partner for the United 

States, and the relationship has endured for more than 

65 years through many shifts in Asia’s geopolitical landscape; 

Whereas the strong relationship between the United States 

and Taiwan is based on mutually beneficial security, commercial, and cultural ties; 

Whereas Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Susan Thornton stated in her testimony before the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives on February 

11, 2016, that ‘‘the people on Taiwan have built a prosperous, free, and orderly society with strong institutions, 

worthy of emulation and envy’’; 

Whereas Deputy Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken stated 

on March 29, 2016, that with Taiwan’s January 2016 
2 

†SCON 38 ES 

elections, ‘‘the people of Taiwan showed the world again 

what a mature, Chinese-speaking democracy looks like’’; 

Whereas, on January 1, 1979, when the Carter Administration established diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), it ended formal diplomatic ties 

with the Republic of China on Taiwan; 

Whereas the United States Congress acted swiftly to reaffirm 

the United States–Taiwan relationship with the enactment of the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8) 

just 100 days later, ensuring the United States maintained a robust and enduring relationship with Taiwan; 

Whereas the Taiwan Relations Act was enacted on April 10, 

1979, codifying into law the basis for continued commercial, cultural, and other relations between the United 

States and Taiwan; 

Whereas the Taiwan Relations Act was enacted ‘‘to help 

maintain peace, security, and stability in the Western Pacific,’’ all of which ‘‘are in the political, security, and economic interests of the United States and are matters of 

international concern’’; 

Whereas the United States Congress significantly strengthened the draft legislation originally submitted by the executive branch to include provisions concerning Taiwan’s 

security in the Taiwan Relations Act; 

Whereas then-Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kin Moy 

stated in his testimony before the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs of the House of Representatives on March 14, 

2014, that ‘‘[o]ur enduring relationship under the Taiwan Relations Act represents a unique asset for the 

United States and is an important multiplier of our influence in the region,’’ and credited the Taiwan Relations 
3 

†SCON 38 ES 

Act for having ‘‘played such a key part in protecting Taiwan’s freedom of action and United States interests the 

last 35 years in the Asia-Pacific area’’; 

Whereas then-Special Assistant to the President and National 

Security Council Senior Director for Asian Affairs Evan 

Medeiros noted in March 2014, ‘‘The Taiwan Relations 

Act is an important and it’s an enduring expression to 

the people of Taiwan about our commitment to their wellbeing, their security, their economic autonomy, and their 

international space.’’; 

Whereas the Taiwan Relations Act states that ‘‘the United 

States decision to establish diplomatic relations with the 

People’s Republic of China rests upon the expectation 

that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful 

means’’; 

Whereas the Taiwan Relations Act states that it is the policy 

of the United States to ‘‘provide Taiwan with arms of a 

defensive character and to maintain the capacity of the 

United States to resist any resort to force or other forms 

of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan’’; 

Whereas each successive United States Administration since 

the enactment of the Taiwan Relations Act has provided 

arms of a defensive character to Taiwan; 

Whereas a 2015 Department of Defense report to Congress 

on Military and Security Developments Involving the 

People’s Republic of China stated that, ‘‘Preparing for 

potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait remains the focus 

and primary driver of China’s military investment’’; 
4 

†SCON 38 ES 

Whereas the United States has an abiding interest in the 

preservation of cross-Strait peace and stability, and in 

peace and stability in the entire Asia-Pacific region; 

Whereas, on July 14, 1982, as the United States negotiated 

with the People’s Republic of China over the wording of 

a joint communique ́ related to United States arms sales 

to Taiwan, President Ronald Reagan instructed his representative in Taiwan, American Institute in Taiwan 

(AIT) Director James R. Lilley, to relay a set of assurances orally to Taiwan’s then-President Chiang Chingkuo; 

Whereas testimony before the Senate and the House of Representatives immediately after the issuance of the August 

17, 1982, Joint Communique ́ with the People’s Republic 

of China, then-Assistant Secretary of State for East 

Asian and Pacific Affairs John H. Holdridge stated on 

behalf of the executive branch that— 

(1) ‘‘. . . [w]e did not agree to set a date certain 

for ending arms sales to Taiwan’’; 

(2) ‘‘. . . [w]e see no mediation role for the United 

States’’ between Taiwan and the PRC; 

(3) ‘‘. . . [n]or will we attempt to exert pressure on 

Taiwan to enter into negotiations with the PRC’’; 

(4) ‘‘. . . [t]here has been no change in our longstanding position on the issue of sovereignty over Taiwan’’; 

(5) ‘‘[w]e have no plans to seek’’ revisions to the 

Taiwan Relations Act; and 

(6) the August 17 Communique ́ ‘‘should not be read 

to imply that we have agreed to engage in prior consultations with Beijing on arms sales to Taiwan’’; 
5 

†SCON 38 ES 

Whereas these assurances, first delivered to Taiwan’s President by AIT Director Lilley, have come to be known as 

the Six Assurances; 

Whereas in testimony before the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives on October 4, 

2011, then-Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell 

stated that the ‘‘Taiwan Relations Act, plus the so-called 

Six Assurances and Three Communique ́s, form the foundation of our overall approach’’ to relations with Taiwan; 

and 

Whereas, in testimony before the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate on April 3, 2014, Assistant Secretary of State Daniel Russel stated that the Six Assurances ‘‘continue to play an important part as an element 

of our approach to Taiwan and the situation across the 

strait’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) affirms that the Taiwan Relations Act and 

4 the Six Assurances are both cornerstones of United 

5 States relations with Taiwan; and 

6 (2) urges the President and the Secretary of 

7 State to affirm the Six Assurances publicly, 
6 

†SCON 38 ES 

1 proactively, and consistently as a cornerstone of 

2 United States–Taiwan relations. 

Passed the Senate July 6, 2016. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 38 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Reaffirming the Taiwan Relations Act and the Six 

Taiwan relations. Assurances as cornerstones of United States–