alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENTS OF INCOME, AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,733,807
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,435,448
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,924,429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,416,787
<PP&E>                                     183,488,174
<DEPRECIATION>                              91,885,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             165,006,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,054,654
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,972,809
<COMMON>                                       160,232
<OTHER-SE>                                (41,351,400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               165,006,779
<SALES>                                      7,803,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,814,383
<CGS>                                        6,103,662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,099,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               597,945
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,147,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,152,719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (280,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,872,719)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,872,719)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00416-CV

IN RE ULLJA KUNTZE

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 14, 2017, Kuntze filed a document which is properly characterized 

as a petition for writ of mandamus. In a separate proceeding, In Re Kuntze, 10-17-00384-

CV, we have explained that such a document is not filed within an existing appeal, but 

rather is docketed as its own proceeding. See In re Kuntze, 10-17-00384-CV, 2017 Tex. App. 

LEXIS 12038 (Tex. App.—Waco Dec. 27, 2017, orig. proceeding).

In this proceeding, Kuntze is critical of the Clerk of this Court for not responding 

to Kuntze’s demands by the deadline set by Kuntze and for failing to notify the trial court 

clerk of what Kuntze perceives as deficiencies in the clerk’s record. Kuntze seeks to have 
In re Kuntze Page 2

the Court’s Clerk removed from office. Kuntze’s complaint is frivolous. We do not have 

jurisdiction to remove the Clerk in this manner.

Kuntze’s petition is dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 3, 2018

[OT06]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6386

JOSE GUTIERREZ, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DAN L. DOVE, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Edgefield, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-01-2622-3-22) Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 26, 2002 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Gutierrez, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jose Gutierrez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gutierrez v. Dove , No. CA-01-2622-3-22 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 15, 2002 & entered Feb. 19, 2002). Gutierrez’s motion for a certificate of appealability is denied as unnecessary. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### BROWN et al. v. DUBUQUE FIRE & MARINE INS. CO.

No. 6682.

United States District Court W. D. Missouri, W. D.

Dec. 28, 1950.

*82C. W. Crossan, Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Robert L. Jackson, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.

REEVES, Chief Judge.

This motion is based upon the fact that prior to the filing of the instant suit the defendant had heretofore, to-wit, on December 30, 1949, filed a suit for a declaratory judgment against the plaintiffs. This suit is numbered 6135 and is pending in this court. The defendant in this action seeks delay of adjudication until the questions raised in the declaratory judgment suit have been determined.

Attention is called to Rule 13(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., which requires a counterclaim under certain contingencies, and it is argued by counsel for the defendant that a counterclaim in case 6135 would have the identical effect as this independent suit. It is unnecessary either to dismiss or delay this action. All of the questions can be resolved by consolidating this action with case numbered 6135.

Accordingly, the two actions, No. 6682 and No. 6135, will be consolidated so that all of the questions can be • determined in one proceeding.
[TYPE]     EX-27
                            FORM 10-Q AMENDED

                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                      Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)

[ X ]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

           For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1996

                                OR

[   ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________________________ to ________________

                 Commission file number 000-20148


                  Citizens Financial Corporation
      (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                 Kentucky                        61-1187135
       (State or other jurisdiction of       (I.R.S. Employer
                organization)               Identification No.)


                    The Marketplace, Suite 300
                      12910 Shelbyville Road
                    Louisville, Kentucky 40243
                  (Address of principal offices)
                            (Zip Code)

                          (502) 244-2420
       (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


                  _____________________________
       (Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
                  if changed since last report)


          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all 
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to 
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.              Yes   X       No   

    Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  Class A Stock -- 1,075,615 as
of August 7, 1996 This report consists of   36  consecutively numbered pages. 
An Exhibit Index appears on page 12.
 

                            SIGNATURES


  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the 
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




                                                                 
                                               CITIZENS FINANCIAL CORPORATION



  August 7, 1996                 BY:  ________________________________________
                                      Darrell R. Wells
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer


 August 7, 1996                  BY:  ______________________________________
                                      Brent L. Nemec
                                      Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's 2006 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.22 
 MASCOMA CORPORATION 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 

TO 

2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and the stockholders of Mascoma Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), approved and adopted the Corporation’s 2006 Stock Incentive
Plan (the “Plan”) on October 26, 2007; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18 of the Plan, the Board
of Directors and the stockholders of the Corporation have determined to amend the Plan to increase the maximum number of shares of Common Stock (as defined in the Plan) that may be issued under the Plan as set forth herein. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Amendment to the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. 

 1.01. Section 4 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “Stock Subject to Plan. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 14 below, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock of the Company which may be issued under the Plan is 9,500,000
shares. If an Option shall expire or terminate for any reason without having been exercised in full, the unpurchased shares subject to such Option shall again be available for subsequent Option grants under the Plan. If shares of Restricted Stock
shall be forfeited to, or otherwise repurchased by, the Company pursuant to a Restricted Stock Agreement, such repurchased shares shall again be available for subsequent Option grants or Restricted Stock Awards under the Plan. If shares issued are
tendered to the Company in payment of the exercise price of an Option, such tendered shares shall again be available for subsequent Option grants or Restricted Stock Awards under the Plan.” 

 

	2.	Miscellaneous. 


2.01. Effect. Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

2.02. Defined Terms. All capitalized terms used but not specifically defined herein shall have the same meanings given such
terms in the Plan unless the context clearly indicates or dictates a contrary meaning. 
 2.03. Governing Law.
This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its conflict of law rules. 
 ADOPTED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS:                     , 2010 

APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS:                     ,
2010
Labor force participation rates of 2007 high school graduates 16 to 24 years old, October 2007


Student status			       Percent	

Total					51.8	
Enrolled in college			39.7	
Full-time students			37.3	
Part-time students			72.7	
Enrolled in 4-year college		31.4	
Enrolled in 2-year college		54.7	
Not enrolled in college			76.6
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason Kulas, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-3 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted
in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in
all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk May 27, 2011

t0524 

# Order

May 27, 2011

142647

LAETHEM EQUIPMENT COMPANY, LAETHEM FARM SERVICE COMPANY, MICHAEL T. LAETHEM, and MARK E. LAETHEM, Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 142647 COA: 293116 Saginaw CC: 05

- 055440

- NM CURRIE KENDALL, P.L.C., Defendant

- Appellant. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN

, J. ( concurring ).

I concur for the simple reason that the language of the release at issue does not include defendants. Unfortunately, the Court of Appeals, which reached the correct result, engaged in an analysis that was clouded and confused by Shay v Aldrich , 487 Mich 648 (2010). Relying upon Shay , as it wa s obligated to do, the Court of Appeals engaged in an unnecessary discussion concerning third

- party beneficiaries to determine

that defendants are not third

- party beneficiaries of this release, a conclusion that is both

obvious and irrelevant. As I stated in my dissent in Shay , “[t]he third

- party

- beneficiary statute is relevant in this case only because it precludes a court from considering plaintiff's motion for reformation, not because it provides a basis for rewriting Michigan

contract law.” Shay , 487 Mich at 704. In the instant case, however, there being no motion for reformation or, indeed, any need for such motion, the third

- party beneficiary statute simply has no application. It is regrettable, but altogether predictable, that the parties would di sagree concerning the meaning of Shay , and that the lower courts in following Shay would engage in irrelevant analysis of contract law. Shay , in my judgment, remains a decision that “unsettles contract law in this state on the basis of an essentially impenetrable analysis.” Id . at 706.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION


      The undersigned officer of DATATRAK International, Inc. (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1.    the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
            June 30, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements
            of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
            amended; and
      2.    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form
            10-Q.

Dated: August 13, 2004                          /s/ Terry C. Black
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Terry C. Black
                                                Chief Financial Officer
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 778 

To prohibit the provision of certain foreign assistance to countries receiving 

certain detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2015 

Mr. COTTON (for himself, Mr. TILLIS, Mrs. ERNST, Mr. VITTER, and Mr. 

LANKFORD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit the provision of certain foreign assistance to 

countries receiving certain detainees transferred from 

United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guantanamo Bay Re5 cidivism Prevention Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 778 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN FOREIGN ASSISTANCE 

2 FOR COUNTRIES RECEIVING CERTAIN DE3 TAINEES TRANSFERRED FROM UNITED 

4 STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, 

5 CUBA. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law, assistance may not be provided under any Act 

8 specified in subsection (b) to a foreign country if— 

9 (1) the country received an individual who was 

10 released or transferred from United States Naval 

11 Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, on or after Feb12 ruary 1, 2015; and 

13 (2) after the date of such release or transfer, 

14 the individual is included in a report under section 

15 319 of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 

16 (Public Law 111–32; 123 Stat. 1874; 10 U.S.C. 801 

17 note) as described by subsection (c)(4) of that sec18 tion. 

19 (b) COVERED ACTS.—The Acts specified in this sub20 section are the following: 

21 (1) The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 

22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.). 

23 (2) The Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

24 2751 et seq.). 

25 (c) COMMENCEMENT OF APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBI26 TION.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall commence 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 778 IS

1 applying to a foreign country on the date of the first re2 port described in subsection (a)(2) that includes any indi3 vidual described in subsection (a)(1) who was received by 

4 the country on or after February 1, 2015. 

5 (d) DURATION OF APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBI6 TION.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall cease with 

7 respect to a foreign country on the date that is five years 

8 after the date of the commencement of the applicability 

9 of the prohibition to the country under subsection (c). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                              
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor 550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2013, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and U.S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-GCJ11 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the period January 1, 2014 through December 31,
2014.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO