alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CMS Energy Corporation (the
"Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David W.
Joos, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas J.
Webb, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

   /s/ David W. Joos
------------------------------
Name:  David W. Joos
Title: President and
       Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 10, 2005

   /s/ Thomas J. Webb
------------------------------
Name:  Thomas J. Webb
Title: Executive Vice President and
       Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 10, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 18




October 2, 2002



Zale Corporation
901 W. Walnut Hill Lane
Irving, Texas 75035-1003


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Zale Corporation and
subsidiaries (the "Company") as of July 31, 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders' investment for the year
then ended, and have reported thereon under date of August 29, 2002. The
aforementioned consolidated financial statements and our audit report thereon
are included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended July
31, 2002. As stated on page F-16 of the notes to those consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of determining price indices used in
the valuation of LIFO inventories in fiscal year 2002, and states that the newly
adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because it more
accurately measures inflation or deflation in its retail prices. In accordance
with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Company officials the
circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the decision to make
this change in the method of accounting was based.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have
not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method
of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the
Company's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management's business
judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Company's circumstances.

Very truly yours,

KPMG LLP
Lawyers

Represent clients in criminal and civil litigation and other legal 

proceedings, draw up legal documents, or manage or advise 

clients on legal transactions. May specialize in a single area or 

may practice broadly in many areas of law.

Cognitive and mental requirements

The qualifications that workers need to use judgment, make 

decisions, interact with others, and adapt to changes in jobs.

In 2023, verbal interactions were required constantly (every few 

minutes) for 12.4 percent of lawyers, and were required not 

constantly, but more than once per hour for 65.2 percent.

Table 1. Percentage of lawyers with cognitive and mental requirements, 2023

Requirement Yes No

Pace: Pause control 94.8 5.2

Interaction with general public >99.5 <0.5

Working around crowds <0.5 >99.5

Telework 67.1 32.9

Work review: Supervising others 40.9 59.1

Work review: Presence of supervisor 44.5 55.5

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Requirements Survey

Education, training, and 

experience requirements

The minimum level of formal 

education required, 

credentials necessary, on-thejob training, and prior work 

experience necessary for 

average performance in jobs.

In 2023, credentials were 

required for greater than 99.5 

percent of lawyers. Prior work 

experience was required for 

44.1 percent and on-the-job 

training was required for 47.6 

percent.

A professional degree was 

required for greater than 99.5 

percent of lawyers.
Occupational Requirements Survey ●www.bls.gov/ors ●orsinfo@bls.gov ●202.691.6199

Environmental conditions

The various tangible or concrete 

hazards or difficulties that are in 

the vicinity of where jobs’ critical 

tasks are performed.

In 2023, greater than 99.5 

percent of lawyers were not 

exposed to extreme cold, and 

greater than 99.5 percent were 

not exposed to extreme heat. 

Wetness was not present for 

greater than 99.5 percent, greater 

than 99.5 percent were not 

exposed to heavy vibrations, and 

97.5 percent were not exposed to 

the outdoors.

Physical demands

Refer to the physical activities 

required to perform tasks in jobs. The 

presence and, in some cases, duration 

of these activities are published.

In 2023, keyboarding was required for 

greater than 99.5 percent of lawyers 

and was not required for less than 0.5 

percent. For less than 0.5 percent of 

workers, keyboarding was seldom 

performed, for 30.1 percent 

keyboarding occurred occasionally, 

65.9 percent frequently, and for 3.8 

percent keyboarding occurred 

constantly.

Performing work in low postures was 

required for 4.1 percent of lawyers and was not required for 95.9 percent.

The choice to sit or stand when performing critical tasks was available to 86.1 percent of lawyers. On average, workers 

spent 82.4 percent of the workday sitting and 17.6 percent of the workday standing.

Table 2. Percentage of lawyers with physical demands, 2023

Requirement Yes No

Choice of sitting or standing 86.1 13.9

Driving 54.5 45.5

Climbing structure-related ramps or stairs 14.1 85.9

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Requirements Survey
Exhibit 99.4

CONSENT OF INTERNAL QUALIFIED RESERVES EVALUATOR

I
consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of Talisman Energy Inc., which is being filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, of my Report on Reserves Data dated March 7, 2008, included in the 2007 Annual Information Form of Talisman Energy Inc. (the "AIF"), and to the
references to my name in the AIF.

I
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



of
my Report on Reserves Data dated March 7, 2008 and to the references to my name in the AIF, which are incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F.

|                |  | By: | /s/MICHAEL ADAMS                     
|--------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------
|Calgary, Canada |  |     | Michael Adams                        
|March 7, 2008   |  |     | Internal Qualified Reserves Evaluator

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ARROW INTERNATIONAL, INC. 1ST QTR 10Q 98 AND 10K 97
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998             AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997             AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,105                   6,276
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,672                  61,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                       812                     855
<INVENTORY>                                     59,777                  57,334
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,783                 135,973
<PP&E>                                         172,395                 171,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,690                  60,474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 327,249                 320,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,413                  54,513
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        45,603                  45,603
<OTHER-SE>                                     209,103                 200,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   327,249                 320,373
<SALES>                                         63,769                 245,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,769                 245,889
<CGS>                                           27,860                 110,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,313                 184,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   248                   2,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,278                  59,732
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,104                  22,997
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,174                  36,735
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,174                  36,735
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44                    1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44                    1.58
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Appellant**

**v.**

**DAVID LEE MAYES, JR.,**

**Appellee :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 73 MAP 2014** 

**Appeal from the Order of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas at No.**  **CP-46-CR-0004983-2012, dated June 4,**

**2014**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, **this 31 st**  **day of August, 2015, the Order of the Court of Comm on** 

**Pleas is hereby** AFFIRMED **. See Commonwealth v. Hopkins, 117 A.3d 247 (Pa. 20 15).**
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK

#### Isabelle L. Richmond v. Trigon Ins. Co.

January 16, 2002

Case No. (Law) L01-2424

BY JUDGE CHARLES D. GRIFFITH, JR.

I have reviewed the authorities presented on January 11, 2002, at the hearing on Defendant’s Special Plea to Jurisdiction and Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s Motion for Declaratory Judgment. In *Reisen*v. *Aetna Life & Casualty Co., 225*Va. 327 (1983), the Supreme Court of Virginia notes that the provisions of Virginia Code § 8.01-184 empower circuit courts to make, “binding adjudications of right” in cases of “actual controversy” where there is “antagonistic assertion and denial of right.” In *Reisen,*the Supreme Court notes that the statutes are to be “liberally interpreted and administered with a view to making the courts more serviceable to the people” but that the controversy must be “justiciable” and one wherein there are “specific adverse claims” involving facts that are “ripe for judicial adjustment.” *Reisen, 225*Va. at 331.

In *USAA Casualty Ins. Co.*v. *Randolph, 225*Va. 342 (1998), the Supreme Court of Virginia notes that the authority to enter a declaratory judgment is a discretionary act of the court which must be exercised with care and caution. *Randolph, 225*Va. at 346. The Supreme Court further notes that a factor to consider is whether resolution of a declaratory judgment would prevent multiple actions from occurring. *Randolph,*225 Va. at 346. Finally, if exercising declaratory judgment, “regarding a disputed fact would be determinative of issues, rather than a construction of definite stated rights, status, or other relations, commonly expressed in written instruments, the case is not appropriate for declaratory judgment.” *Randolph,*255 Va. at 346.

In this case, even if the Court heard the declaratory judgment action and determined that Dr. Richmond’s contract was to be interpreted in a particular *277manner, the defendant in this action, Trigon, would not necessarily be prevented from instituting an action on the contract for the amount which Trigon claims Dr. Richmond was paid due to their claim of overbilling. Further, the declaratory judgment action would necessarily require the resolution of a disputed fact, namely, whether Dr. Richmond through some manner did, or did not, overbill Trigon and is not specifically designed merely to construe the contract and whether Dr. Richmond has specific rights under that contract. Therefore, the Court’s determination is that this matter is not appropriate for a declaratory judgment and grants Defendant’s Motion and dismisses the Declaratory Judgment action.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encysive Pharmaceuticals
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Bruce D. Given, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ BRUCE D. GIVEN, M.D.
-------------------------------------
Bruce D. Given, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Encysive
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF INCOME, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS, BALANCE SHEET, AND STATEMENT OF
COMMON STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000201533
<NAME> CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        4,387
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        711
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             718
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,347
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,163
<COMMON>                                           841
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                          502
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                434
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,845
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              220
<PREFERRED>                                        238
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               805
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 215
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        1,202
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      119
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        100
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    33
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   2,454
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    7,163
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        3,709
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               158
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       3,060
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       3,218
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            491
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  33
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     524
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           175
<NET-INCOME>                                       349
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         37
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      312
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           241
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           84
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             625
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,294
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           1,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                     684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 319,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         28,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   319,216
<SALES>                                          1,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,808
<CGS>                                              915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,368
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,247
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,247
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.25
        

</TABLE>
Submitted May 2,

reversed June 11, 2008

#### In the Matter of C. J. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*C. J. A., *Appellant.*

Wallowa County Circuit Court

051107; A135921

186 P3d 323

Janie M. Burcart filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Anna M. Joyce, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*456PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is a danger to others. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing nonhearsay evidence that defendant’s mental disorder causes him to be a danger to others. On *de novo*review, we find the state’s concession to be well founded and accept it.

Reversed.
Exhibit 13.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Graña y Montero S.A.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2013, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Monica Miloslavich, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley-Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/ Monica Miloslavich                                 
|Name: Monica Miloslavich Title: Chief
Financial Officer

April 28, 2014