alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF PERIODIC REPORT
  
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the annual
period ended August 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:     June 13, 2006/s/ Raymond M. TrewhellaRaymond M. Trewhella
Principal Executive Officer
  
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the annual
period ended August 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:     June 13, 2006/s/ Nathan G. Leaphart III, CPANathan G. Leaphart III, CPA
Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Executive Bonus Program




 Exhibit 10.45 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE CARMIKE CINEMAS, INC. 
 ANNUAL EXECUTIVE BONUS PROGRAM 

Pursuant to its authority to amend the Carmike Cinemas, Inc. Annual Executive Bonus Program (the “Program”) set forth in Section 8, the
Committee hereby amends the Program, effective as of January 1, 2009. 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, Committee desires to amend the Program effective as of January 1, 2009 to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
(“Code”); 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment,
the Committee hereby amends the Program as follows effective as of January 1, 2009: 
 §1 
 By amending §5, Certification, to add the following language to the end of the last sentence of such section: 
 “; provided, however, to the extent required to avoid the imposition of an additional tax under §409A of the Code, where the Committee exercises
its discretion to pay a bonus to a Participant who is not employed with Carmike on the date the bonus is to be paid, the bonus payment to such Participant shall be paid no later than the March 15 immediately following the year in which the
Committee acts to waive the employment requirement.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has adopted this Amendment Number One by
resolution dated the 3rd day of December, 2008.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                      CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Wells-Gardner Electronics Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements
on Form S-8 (#2-72090, #2-09137, #33-63920, #33-61535, and #33-02981) of
Wells-Gardner Electronics Corporation of  our reports dated January  31,
1997,  relating  to  the  balance  sheet  of  Wells-Gardner  Electronics
Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements
of operations,  shareholders' equity,  and cash  flows for  each of  the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, and the  related
schedule, which reports are included in or incorporated by reference  in
the December  31,  1996 annual  report  on Form  10-K  of  Wells-Gardner
Electronics Corporation.


                                     KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 21, 1997
<PAGE>
SATURNA INVESTMENT TRUST

POWER OFATTORNEY

 

The undersigned Trustees of Saturna Investment Trust, a MassachusettsBusiness Trust organized under the laws of the State of Washington, proposing tofile with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, one or more amendments to the Registration Statement on FormN-1A and related Amendments to the Registration Statement of the Trust under theInvestment Company Act of 1940 ("Amendments") do hereby separately and severallyappoint and constitute Nicholas F. Kaiser, whose signature appears below:

/s/ Nicholas F. Kaiser

Nicholas F. Kaiser

his true and lawful attorney for him and in his name, place and stead to signin the capacity of a Trustee of the Trust such Amendments and any and alladditional amendments thereto, and to file such amendments and all instrumentsnecessary or incidental thereto with the Securities and Exchange Commissionunder such 1933 and 1940 Acts.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand and seal this17th day of December, 2003.

 

/s/ A. Herbert Ershig	

A. Herbet Ershig			

 

/s/ Gary A. Goldfogel 	

Gary A. Goldfogel					 

			

 

/s/ John E. Love		

John E. Love

 

/s/ John S. Moore		

John S. Moore
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2013, by and among WELLS FARGOCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS Series 2013-C14 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit 31.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)


of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934








I, Andrew Jeanneret, certify that:





1.             I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Dialysis Corporation of America for the year ended December 31, 2009;





2.             Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;








Date: April 30, 2010
/s/ Andrew JeanneretANDREW JEANNERET,Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 153 (Thursday, August 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 37449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16899]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[CERCLA-04-2017-3757; FRL-9965-77-Region 4]


Coronet Industries, Inc. Plant City, Hillsborough County, 
Florida; Notice of Amendment to Federal Register Notice

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 26, 2017, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
published a Notice of Settlement under Section 122(h) of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act 
(CERCLA) addressing cost for work performed at the Coronet Industries, 
Inc. Site located in Plant City, Hillsborough County, Florida, FRL-
9965-49-Region 4 (82 FR 34655). The published notice did not list 
Coronet Industries Inc, as one of the settling parties to the 
settlement.

DATES: The comment period for the original notice is unchanged. The 
Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until August 25, 
2017. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose 
facts or considerations which indicate that the proposed settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from the Agency by 
contacting Ms. Paula V. Painter, Program Analyst, using the contact 
information provided in this notice. Comments may also be submitted by 
referencing the Site's name through one of the following methods:
    <bullet> Internet: https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-epa-region-4-southeast#r4-public-notices.
    <bullet> U.S. Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund 
Division, Attn: Paula V. Painter, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303.
    <bullet> Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cc9cada5a2b8a9bee29cadb9a0ad8ca9bcade2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e8b88981869c8d9ac6b8899d8489a88d9889c68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404-562-8887. 
Attn: Paula V. Painter, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
    <bullet> Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82d2e3ebecf6e7f0acd2e3f7eee3c2e7f2e3ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f7a7969e99839285d9a796829b96b7928796d9909881">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 27, 2017.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Enforcement and Community Engagement Branch, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-16899 Filed 8-9-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LAWRENCE GLEN ADAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 632 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LAWRENCE GLEN ADAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 633 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LAWRENCE GLEN ADAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 634 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM
[632 MAL 2016, 633 MAL 2016 and 634 MAL 2016] - 2

AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed  America,  Inc. (the
      "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2007 as filed
      with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
      "Report"),  I John W. Hlywak, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  /s/ 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           2. The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company.



                               /s/John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  November 14, 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 99-10216

Summary Calendar

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CYNTHIA MIZELL, a/k/a Cynthia Walker,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:98-CV-408-Y & 4:92-CR-128-A)

December 1, 1999

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cynthia Mizell, federal prisoner # 23825-077, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of

her “Motion to Correct Sentencing Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6).” Based on the issues

Mizell sought to raise, the district court correctly construed Mizell’s motion as a successive

challenge to her sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Mizell’s Rule 60(b) motion was an obvious

attempt to circumvent the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s (“AEDPA’s”)

prohibition against filing successive § 2255 motions. “Rule 60(b) cannot be used to circumvent

restraints on successive habeas petitions. That was true before [AEDPA] was enacted, and it is

equally true, if not more so, under the new act.” United States v. Rich, 141 F.3d 550, 553 (5th

Cir. 1998) (alteration in original) (quoting Felker v. Turpin, 101 F.3d 657, (11th Cir. 1996)).
-2-

Because Mizell did not obtain this court’s permission to file a successive § 2255 motion as

required under § 2244(b)(3) and § 2255, the district court lacked jurisdiction over Mizell’s

successive § 2255 motion. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction over Mizell’s appeal, and her

appeal is DISMISSED. Mizell’s motion to compel this court to allow her to proceed on appeal

without a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          19,442
<SECURITIES>                                    11,472
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,915
<INVENTORY>                                     63,791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,385
<PP&E>                                         127,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 298,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,714
<BONDS>                                         66,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                     164,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   298,883
<SALES>                                        190,419
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,419
<CGS>                                           95,391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               115,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,664)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,639
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,303)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,303)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.43)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section1350,**

**As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2003 of Riverwood Holding, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |                                          | /s/ STEPHEN  M. HUMPHREY |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|   | Name:  Stephen M. Humphrey                    |
|   | Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Date: August  7, 2003                         |

 

1

----

**Exhibit 32 (cont'd)**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section1350,**

**As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2003 of Riverwood Holding, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                                                       | /s/ DANIEL  J. BLOUNT |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|   | Name: Daniel  J. Blount                                    |
|   | Title:  Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date: August  7, 2003                                      |

 

2

----
<style>	
	<!--	
	<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/bls_combined.css">
	<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/bls_content.css">
	<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/bls_tables.css">
	<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/jquery-tools.css">
	<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/bls_mlr.css">
	-->	
</style>  

<div style="padding:1em;">
	
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2023_7_26_12_14" style="width: 95%;"><caption><span class="tableTitle">Table 12. Share of estimates with “large” differences after exclusion of wc costs, by estimate type and work status (ECEC)</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; min-width: 80px;" rowspan="1" scope="col">Work status</th>
<th scope="col">Number of estimates</th>
<th scope="col">Estimates with “large” differences</th>
<th scope="col">Share (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th style="text-align: left;" colspan="4" scope="row">
<p>Total compensation</p>
</th>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>  Part time</p>
</th>
<td>518</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>  Full time</p>
</th>
<td>925</td>
<td>25</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th style="text-align: left;" colspan="4" scope="row">
<p>Total benefits</p>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>  Part time</p>
</th>
<td>518</td>
<td>294</td>
<td>57</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>  Full time</p>
</th>
<td>925</td>
<td>407</td>
<td>44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th style="text-align: left;" colspan="4" scope="row">
<p>Legally required benefits</p>
</th>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>  Full time</p>
</th>
<td>925</td>
<td>925</td>
<td>100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>  Part time</p>
</th>
<td>518</td>
<td>515</td>
<td>99</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2023_7_26_12_14_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="4">
<p>Note: ECEC = Employer Costs for Employee Compensation. WC = workers' compensation. Estimates are ordered by share with “large” differences. We define “large” as an amount at least equivalent to what would be a statistically significant change at the 10-percent level, 1.64 times the standard error for the estimate.</p>
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table></div>
#### In the Matter of Rodderick Morris, Petitioner, v Louis J. Calderone, Respondent.

[854 NYS2d 189]

The respondent terminated the petitioner’s employment, effective August 28, 2006, after a disciplinary hearing pursuant to *742Civil Service Law § 75. The hearing officer found the petitioner guilty of four specifications of misconduct relating to insubordination and unauthorized absences, and recommended termination. The petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging his termination, contending that the findings of guilt were not supported by substantial evidence and that the penalty imposed was overly harsh. We disagree and accordingly dismiss the proceeding.

To annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 231 [1974]; *Matter of Isaksson-Wilder v New York State Div. of Human Rights,*43 AD3d 921, 922 [2007]). The petitioner’s contention that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence is without merit. The testimony of the respondent’s two witnesses, and other documents admitted into evidence, established the facts necessary to sustain the charges. The hearing officer, before whom all the witnesses appeared, credited the testimony of the respondent’s witnesses and not the testimony of the petitioner and his witness. A reviewing court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the hearing officer where there is conflicting evidence and room for choice exists *(see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]; *Matter of Collins v Codd,*38 NY2d 269, 270-271 [1976]).

Further, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offenses committed as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(see Matter of Turner v Simpson,*60 NY2d 959, 961 [1983]; *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d at 233).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Dillon, McCarthy and Helen, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 22, 2019

No. 04-18-00601-CV

One Thousand Four Hundred Thirty-Seven Dollars ($1,437.00) in United States Currency and a 

2016 Toyota Corolla VIN 2T1BURHE0GC627119,

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-223

Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The State’s brief was originally due on March 4, 2019. After this court advised the State 

that its brief was overdue, the State moved for an extension of time to file its brief until April 22, 

2019. 

The State’s motion is GRANTED. The State’s brief is due on April 22, 2019. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of March, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court