alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2023_10_24_7_52" style="width: 95%;"><caption><span class="tableTitle">Chart 3. Percentage of people with a disability, American Indians and Alaska Natives and the total population, averages for the combined years 2019–21</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; min-width: 80px;" rowspan="1" scope="col">Characteristic</th>
<th scope="col">American Indian and Alaska Native</th>
<th scope="col">Total population</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>Total, 16 years and over</p>
</th>
<td>14.8</td>
<td>11.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>16 to 24 years</p>
</th>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>4.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>25 to 54 years</p>
</th>
<td>9.9</td>
<td>6.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>55 years and over</p>
</th>
<td>30.5</td>
<td>22.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2023_10_24_7_52_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="3">
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
Women's percentage of industry employment, 
selected industries, 2007

						Percent women	

Construction					      9.4	
Mining						     13.8	
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting	     23.4	
Transportation and utilities			     24.6	
Manufacturing					     30.0	
Total, all industries 				     46.4	
Leisure and hospitality				     51.4	
Other services					     52.0	
Financial activities				     55.4	
Education and health services			     74.7
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 56 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 56

  To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile service 
                     through the Lifeline program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 7, 2015

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile service 
                     through the Lifeline program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Mobile Phone Welfare Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIFELINE SUPPORT FOR COMMERCIAL MOBILE SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--A provider of commercial mobile service may not 
receive universal service support under sections 214(e) and 254 of the 
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 214(e) and 254) for the provision 
of such service through the Lifeline program of the Federal 
Communications Commission.
    (b) Commercial Mobile Service Defined.--In this section, the term 
``commercial mobile service'' has the meaning given such term in 
section 332(d)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
332(d)(1)).
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
 Colorado Interstate Gas Company
Ownership List as of December 31, 2007
 Jurisdiction ofCompany Name
    
    Incorporation
    
    
    % HeldColorado Interstate Gas Company
    
    DelawareCIG Finance Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00CIG Funding Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00Colorado Interstate Issuing Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00WYCO Holding Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100.00WYCO Development LLC
    
    Colorado
    
    
    50.00
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CINEMARK USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      15,157,597
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,919,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,663,209
<PP&E>                                     573,455,738
<DEPRECIATION>                              89,440,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             566,687,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       52,585,820
<BONDS>                                    304,953,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    49,537,462
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,873,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               566,687,709
<SALES>                                    326,980,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           326,980,952
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              241,594,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          23,655,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             22,739,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                10,257,330
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,482,198
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (55,746)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,426,452
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    66.19
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

 

  I, **Nicholas Kaiser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form N-CSR for the period ended November 30, 2012 (the “Report”).

 I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

  Date: January 29, 2013  /s/ *Nicholas Kaiser*  President 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

  I, **Christopher Fankhauser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form N-CSR for the period ended November 30, 2012 (the “Report”).

I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

Date: January 29, 2013

/s/ *Christopher Fankhauser*Treasurer
<PAGE>  

CMS ENERGY
Fairlane Plaza South
330 Town Center Drive
Suite 1100
Dearborn, MI  48126-2712
Tel: 313 436 9200
Fax: 313 436 9225


February 27, 1998

Mr. Alan M. Wright and
Mr. Thomas A. McNish
Fairlane Plaza South, Suite 1100
330 Town Center Drive
Dearborn, MI 48126

CMS Energy Corporation is required to file an Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 90 days after the end of the year.

We hereby make, constitute and appoint each of you our true and lawful
attorney for each of us and in each of our names, places and steads to
sign and cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
said Annual Report with any necessary exhibits, and any amendments thereto
that may be required.

Very truly yours,



   /s/ William T. McCormick, Jr.              /s/ Victor J. Fryling   
      William T. McCormick, Jr.                Victor J. Fryling




          /s/ John Deutch                       /s/ W. U. Parfet        
           John M. Deutch                      William U. Parfet




      /s/ James J. Duderstadt                /s/ Percy A. Pierre         
         James J. Duderstadt                    Percy A. Pierre




        /s/ K. R. Flaherty                       /s/ Whipple             
        Kathleen R. Flaherty                    Kenneth Whipple




        /s/ Earl D. Holton                   /s/ John B. Yasinsky        
           Earl D. Holton                      John B. Yasinsky
<PAGE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 3, 2014

NO. 03-12-00280-CR

Mark David Simmons, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE, AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-2112WA

_____________ Delores A. Stephens, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas. * Rheem Manufacturing Company, * [PUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: December 14, 1998

Filed: December 23, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, HEANEY, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Delore s A. Stephens appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Rheem Manufacturing Company (Rheem) on Stephens’s Title VII sexual harassment claim and her related state law claims. Relying on our existing case law, the distric t court granted summary judgment to Rheem because Stephens presented no evidence that Rhee m knew or should have known about the harassing behavior of Stephens’ s super visor

or that Rheem failed to take proper remedial action once notified of th e al legedharassment. See Callanan v. Runyun , 75 F.3d 1293, 1296 (8th Cir. 1996)

. These factors are no longer controlling on the issue of Rheem’s liability however

. After the district court granted summary judgment and before oral argument, th e United-2-

States Supreme Court decided Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth , 118 S. Ct. 225 7 (1998) , and Faragher v. City of Boca Raton , 118 S. Ct. 2275 (1998). In Ellerth an d Faraghe r , the Supreme Court held that an employer is vicariously liable for a superv isor’s sexual harassment of an employee when the harassment results in a tangible employment action such as dis charge, undesirable reassignment, or demotion. See Ellerth , 118 S. Ct. at 2270; Faragher , 118 S. Ct. at 2292-93; see also Newton v. Cadwell Laboratories , 156 F.3d 880, 883 (8th Cir. 1998). The Court also held tha t absent a tangible employment action, the employer will be vicariously liable to th e employee for an actionable hostile work environment created by a supervisor, unless the employ er can prove by a preponderance of the evidence a two-part affirmativ e defense. Se e Ellerth , 118 S. Ct. at 2270; Faragher , 118 S. Ct. at 2293; see als o Newton , 156 F.3d at 883.
Because the district court did not decide whether Stephens suffered a tangible employm ent

action, we reverse the grant of summary judgment and remand to giv e Step hens the opportunity to show she has a claim for which Rheem is vicariousl y liable. See Newton , 156 F.3d at 883-8 4. If Stephens cannot demonstrate she suffered a tangibl e employment action but can show her supervisor’s conduct created a n actionable hos tile work environment, Rheem will be entitled to present an affirmative defense to the hostile work environment claim. See id. We also reverse the grant of summary judgment on Stephens’s state law claims and remand them for furthe r consideration by the district court. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 501 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 501

To make technical corrections to the Navajo water rights settlement in 
            the State of New Mexico, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2015

Mr. Udall (for himself and Mr. Heinrich) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make technical corrections to the Navajo water rights settlement in 
            the State of New Mexico, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New Mexico Navajo Water Settlement 
Technical Corrections Act''.

SEC. 2. NAVAJO WATER SETTLEMENT.

    (a) Definitions.--Section 10302 of the Omnibus Public Land 
Management Act of 2009 (43 U.S.C. 407 note; Public Law 111-11) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Arrellano'' and 
        inserting ``Arellano''; and
            (2) in paragraph (27), by striking ``75-185'' and inserting 
        ``75-184''.
    (b) Delivery and Use of Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project Water.--
Section 10603(c)(2)(A) of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 
2009 (Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1385) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``Article III(c)'' and 
        inserting ``Articles III(c)''; and
            (2) in clause (ii)(II), by striking ``Article III(c)'' and 
        inserting ``Articles III(c)''.
    (c) Project Contracts.--Section 10604(f)(1) of the Omnibus Public 
Land Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1391) is 
amended by inserting ``Project'' before ``water''.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 10609 of the Omnibus 
Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1395) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b), by 
        striking ``construction or rehabilitation'' each place it 
        appears and inserting ``planning, design, construction, 
        rehabilitation,'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``2 percent'' and 
        inserting ``4 percent''; and
            (3) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ``4 percent'' and 
        inserting ``2 percent''.
    (e) Agreement.--Section 10701(e) of the Omnibus Public Land 
Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1400) is amended 
in paragraphs (2)(A), (2)(B), and (3)(A) by striking ``and Contract'' 
each place it appears.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
INTERIM STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10QSB FOR QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,514,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                       953
<INVENTORY>                                    115,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,814,510
<PP&E>                                         289,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                 221,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,893,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,687,289
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,623,706
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       110,002
<OTHER-SE>                                   (527,084)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,893,913
<SALES>                                         15,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,301
<CGS>                                           14,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               381,340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (422,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (422,145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (422,145)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
#### Enrique ALARCON, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-71443.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Jan. 8, 2008.

Law Offices of Michael J. Selph, North Hollywood, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, M. Jocelyn Wright, Esq., Brianne Whelan, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Enrique Alarcon seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision to deny Alarcon’s application for cancellation of removal as a matter of discretion. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003) (stating the court lacks jurisdiction to consider “all discretionary decisions involved in the cancellation of removal context, including the ultimate discretionary decision to deny relief’); *see also Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 599-600 & n. 5 (9th Cir.2006) (stating the court does not have jurisdiction to consider the ultimate discretionary decision to deny relief).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in millions)
 Three FiscalMonths EndedMarch 31,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001EARNINGS, AS DEFINEDEarnings (loss) from operations before income
taxes and before adjustments for minority
interests in consolidated subsidiaries and after
eliminating
undistributed earnings of equity method investees
    
    $
    33.6
    
    
    $
    61.5
    
    
    $
    18.5
    
    
    $
    (1.2
    )
    
    $
    (27.6
    )
    
    $
    58.1Preferred stock dividend (pre-tax equivalent)
    
    
    (0.1
    )
    
    
    (33.8
    )
    
    
    (9.2
    )
    
    
    (0.9
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Fixed charges
    
    
    11.0
    
    
    
    76.7
    
    
    
    49.4
    
    
    
    53.6
    
    
    
    47.5
    
    
    
    51.5TOTAL EARNINGS, AS DEFINED
    
    $
    44.5
    
    
    $
    104.4
    
    
    $
    58.7
    
    
    $
    51.5
    
    
    $
    19.9
    
    
    $
    109.6FIXED CHARGES, AS DEFINEDInterest expense
    
    $
    9.4
    
    
    $
    36.5
    
    
    $
    35.0
    
    
    $
    45.3
    
    
    $
    41.3
    
    
    $
    43.2Amortization of capitalized expenses related to debt
    
    
    0.7
    
    
    
    3.4
    
    
    
    2.7
    
    
    
    4.5
    
    
    
    3.7
    
    
    
    4.4Preferred stock dividend (pre-tax equivalent)
    
    
    0.1
    
    
    
    33.8
    
    
    
    9.2
    
    
    
    0.9
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest component of rent expense
    
    
    0.8
    
    
    
    3.0
    
    
    
    2.5
    
    
    
    2.9
    
    
    
    2.5
    
    
    
    3.9TOTAL FIXED CHARGES, AS DEFINED
    
    $
    11.0
    
    
    $
    76.7
    
    
    $
    49.4
    
    
    $
    53.6
    
    
    $
    47.5
    
    
    $
    51.5RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
    
    
    4.0
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2.1
  51
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) / Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   May 10, 2006
 /s/ Gordon H. BusenbarkGordon H. BusenbarkChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit
32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Le@P
Technology, Inc. (the Company) for the twelve month period ended December 31,
2005 (the Annual Report), I, Timothy C. Lincoln, Acting Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
and belief that the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: March 27, 2006
/s/ Timothy C. LincolnTimothy C. LincolnActing Principal Executive Officer