alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for International Science and Engineering; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

    Name and Committee Code: Proposal Review Panel for International 
Science and Engineering--PIRE ``ExTerra Field Institute and Research 
Endeavor (E-FIRE)'' Site Visit (#10749).
    Date/Time: September 6, 2017 8:00 a.m.-9:30 p.m. September 7, 
2017 8:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
    Place: Boise State University, Department of Geosciences, 1910 
University Drive, Boise, ID 83725-1135.
    Type of Meeting: Part Open.
    Contact Person: Charles Estabrook, PIRE Program Manager, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 
22230; Telephone 703/292-7222.
    Purpose of Meeting: NSF site visit during year 2 of the five-
year award period to conduct an in-depth evaluation of performance, 
to assess progress towards goals, and to provide recommendations.

Agenda

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

8:00 a.m.-10:00 a.m. Introductions, PIRE Rationale and Goals, 
Administration, Management, and Budget Plans, Review of Responses to 
Issues by Past Reviewers
10:00 a.m.-10:20 a.m. NSF Executive Session/Break (CLOSED)
10:20 a.m.-Noon Research, Facilities and Physical Infrastructure
Noon-12:30 p.m. NSF Executive Session (CLOSED)
12:30 p.m.-1:30 p.m. Lunch--Discussion with Students
1:30 p.m.-3:00 p.m. Integrating Research and Education, Developing 
Human Resources, Integrating Diversity
3:00 p.m.-3:30 p.m. NSF Executive Session/Break (CLOSED)
3:30 p.m.-4:15 p.m. Partnerships
4:15 p.m.-5:15 p.m. Wrap up
5:15 p.m.-6:15 p.m. Executive Session/Break (CLOSED)
6:15 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Critical Feedback Provided to PI
8:00 p.m.-9:30 p.m. NSF Executive Session/Working Dinner (CLOSED) 
Committee organizes on its own

Thursday, September 7, 2017

8:00 a.m.-9:00 a.m. Institutional Support (Administrators and PI/Co-
PIs) (CLOSED)
9:00 a.m.-10:00 a.m. Summary/Proposing Team to Critical Feedback 
(CLOSED)
10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Site Review Team Prepares Site Visit Report 
(CLOSED) (Working Lunch Provided)
4:00 p.m.-4:30 p.m. Presentation of Site Visit Report to Principal 
Investigator (CLOSED)

    Reason for Late Notice: Due to unforeseen scheduling 
complications and the necessity to proceed with the review of 
proposals.
    Reason for Closing: Topics to be discussed and evaluated during 
closed portions of the site review will include information of a 
proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; 
and information on personnel. These matters are exempt under 5 
U.S.C.552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

     Dated: August 21, 2017.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-17928 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 35.6



|     |  |  |  |  |  |  |                         |                         
|---- |  |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------- | ------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |  |  |                         | Corporate Trust Services
|     |  |  |  |  |  |  | MAC R1204-010          
|     |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9062 Old Annapolis Road
|     |  |  |  |  |  |  | Columbia, MD 21045     
|     |  |  |  |  |  |  | Tel: 410 884 2000      
|     |  |  |  |  |  |  | Fax: 410 715 2380      

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II,

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-GC10

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|               
|---------------
|March 10, 2014 
|               
|/s/ Brian Smith
|BRIAN SMITH    
|Vice President 



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 15, 2 014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00078

- CV

RIVER CITY CARE CENTER, INC. d/b/a River City Care Center, Appellant

v.

Betty TAYLOR

, Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 15814 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judg e Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due to be filed in this appeal on March 7, 2014. The court reporter responsible for preparing the record, Ms. Judith A. Stewart, was previously granted an additional thirty day extension to file the record, extending the deadline for filing the record to April 7, 2014. The record h as not been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that Ms. Stewart file the

record in this court no later than May 7, 2014 . If the record is not received by such date, an order may be issued directing Ms. St ewart to appear and show cause why she should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record. The clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to

be served on Ms. Judith A. Stewart by certified mail, return receipt requested, or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery. Because “[t]he trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed,” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 35.3(c), the clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy o f this order on the Honorable Barbara Hanson

Nellermoe , Judge of the 37th Judicial District Court.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixe d the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130024 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, EDNO DINO CASEY III, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130024 

 COA: 262142 
 Wayne CC: 01-130385-NI

BRIAN L. CLOWERS,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

DAH TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., and 

CITY OF DETROIT,

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 27, 2006 

Clerk
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 719 

AN ACT 

To rename the Armed Forces Reserve Center in Great Falls, 

Montana, the Captain John E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces Reserve Center. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 719 ES

1 SECTION 1. RENAMING OF THE ARMED FORCES RESERVE 

2 CENTER IN GREAT FALLS, MONTANA, AS THE 

3 CAPTAIN JOHN E. MORAN AND CAPTAIN WIL4 LIAM WYLIE GALT ARMED FORCES RESERVE 

5 CENTER. 

6 (a) RENAMING.—The Armed Forces Reserve Center 

7 in Great Falls, Montana, shall hereafter be known and 

8 designated as the ‘‘Captain John E. Moran and Captain 

9 William Wylie Galt Armed Forces Reserve Center’’. 

10 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, 

11 regulation, map, document, paper, other record of the 

12 United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) 

13 shall be considered to be a reference to the Captain John 

14 E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces 

15 Reserve Center. 

Passed the Senate March 16, 2016. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 719 

AN ACT 

To rename the Armed Forces Reserve Center in 

Forces Reserve Center. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Great Falls, Montana, the Captain John E.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 4.10.1



                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                   WARRANT FOR PURCHASE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
                      OF NORRIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
                    (FOR 129,230 SHARES DATED MARCH 25, 1996)

This shall constitute an Amendment to that certain Warrant for the Purchase of
Shares of Common Stock (the "Warrant") executed as of March 25, 1996, by Norris
Communications Corporation (predecessor to Norris Communications, Inc., the
"Issuer") in favor of First Bermuda Securities Limited (the "Holder"), which
agreement granted to Holder the right to purchase 129,230 shares of common stock
of the Corporation, Said Warrant is hereby amended and modified in the following
manner:

1. To cancel 101,730 shares subject to option, amend the Warrant to reflect
27,500 shares subject to option and amend the Exercise Price to $0.25 per share,
the first paragraph of the Warrant is hereby deleted and replaced with the
following paragraph:

     "This certifies that, for value received, First Bermuda Securities Limited
     and any subsequent transferee pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and
     this Warrant (each, "Holder") is entitled to purchase, subject to the
     provisions of this Warrant, from Norris Communications, Inc., a Delaware
     corporation (the "Issuer"), at any time or from time to time on or after
     the date hereof and on or before March 25, 2001 (the "Expiration Date"),
     27,500 fully paid and nonassessable shares of common stock, par value
     $0.001 (the "Common Stock"), of the Issuer at a price equal to $0.25 per
     share (the "Exercise Price") (such shares of Common Stock and other
     securities issued and issuable upon exercise of this Warrant, the "Warrant
     Shares")."

All other provisions of the Warrant shall remain in full force and effect as
amended, without modification.

The undersigned Holder acknowledges that the Warrant has not been assigned,
transferred, pledged or encumbered in any manner and that the undersigned has
all corporate power and authority to execute this amendment which is a binding
agreement between Holder and Issuer.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Issuer and Holder have caused this Amendment to be
executed by duly authorized officers effective as of this 29th day of September,
1997.

NORRIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


BY: /s/  Alfred H. Falk
   ------------------------------------
       Alfred H. Falk, President

FIRST BERMUDA SECURITIES LIMITED

BY: /s/ Maxwell Roberts
   ------------------------------------
       Maxwell Roberts, Chief Operating Officer

Printed Name: Maxwell Roberts
             --------------------------
Position: Chief Operating Officer
         ------------------------------
*AMENDED RESUBMIT CLD-254 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 18-1431

___________

GENNARO RAUSO,

Appellant

v.

WARDEN SCHUYLKILL FCI; CLERK OF COURTS FOR THE UNITED STATES 

DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(M.D. Pa. Civil Action No. 1-17-cv-00720)

District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or 

Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

June 28, 2018

Before: CHAGARES, GREENAWAY, Jr., and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: January 9, 2019

____________

OPINION*

____________

PER CURIAM

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

Gennaro Rauso, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals orders of the United 

States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania dismissing his petition for a 

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and denying his motion for 

reconsideration. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm. 

Rauso claims in his habeas petition that the Clerk of the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania failed to enter his motions and papers on 

the docket of his criminal case and returned his papers to him in violation of his First 

Amendment right of access to the courts. As recognized by the District Court, Rauso’s 

claim is not cognizable in a habeas action. See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 

(1973) (stating that the essence of habeas corpus is an attack upon the legality of custody 

and that the traditional function of the writ is to secure release from illegal custody);

Coady v. Vaughn, 251 F.3d 480, 485 (3d Cir. 2001) (noting that § 2241 confers habeas 

corpus jurisdiction over petitions by federal prisoners challenging the execution of their 

sentences).

Accordingly, because this appeal does not raise a substantial question, we will 

affirm the judgment of the District Court.1

 1

Rauso’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal without prejudice or, in the alternative, 

stay disposition of the appeal pending the adjudication of his September 6, 2018 filing in 

District Court is denied. To the extent Rauso requests in his motion additional time to 

file a response to possible summary action or dismissal of his appeal, his request is

denied. Rauso has been afforded two extensions of time and has been advised that no 

further extensions would be granted. Rauso’s third motion for an extension of time and 

motion to consolidate his appeals is also denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0660

IN THE MATTER OF: 

R.V.,

A Youth.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 4, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 24 2024

09/24/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0660
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 3,
2013 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2013-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as
in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of
the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                         |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.
|                                     |  |                                         |  | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  |  |  | Dated: March 15, 2017
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 1

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Union Representation Elections,

1998-2002

by Michael H. Cimini

Originally Posted: April 28, 2003

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Union Representation Elections, 1998-2002 (1)

Year Total number

of elections

Elections won 

by unions

Percent won

by unions

Number of eligible 

employees in wins

1998 3,339 1,869 56 90,658

1999 3,162 1,676 53 104,045

2000 2,988 1,549 51 107,359

2001 2,707 1,445 53 79,765

2002 2,599 1,423 54 78,243

Footnotes:

(1) Closed cases resulting from petitions filed by a union or employees seeking an election to determine a collective bargaining

representative, or petitions from employers seeking an election to determine a collective bargaining representative.

Source: National Labor Relations Board.

One of the principal functions of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is to determine, through secret-ballot elections,

the free choice of employees regarding whether or not they wish to be represented by a union in dealing with their employers,

and if they do wish to be, by which union. The following is a summary of the NLRB union representation elections for the

1998-2002 period: • The number of National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) union representation elections declined in 4 consecutive years

during the 1998-2002 period. • The number of NLRB elections won by unions also declined 4 years in a row during the period. • The percent of NLRB elections won by unions ranged from 51 to 56 percent over the 5-year period, with slight

increases occurring from 2000 to 2002. • The number of eligible employees affected by NLRB elections that were won by unions fluctuated over the 5-year

period, increasing substantially from 1998 to 1999 and declining markedly from 2000 to 2001.

Michael H. Cimini

Economist (Retired), formerly with the Office of Compensation and Working Conditions, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Division of Information and Marketing Services, PSB Suite 2850, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC

20212-0001 | www.bls.gov/OPUB | Telephone: 1-202-691-5200 | Contact Us
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 25, 2014

No. 04-14-00446-CV

John THOMAS,

Appellant

v.

Cynthia THOMAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-45C

Honorable Robert R. Barton, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On September 17, 2014, this court issued a memorandum opinion dismissing the appeal. 

On September 22, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion to expedite mandate pursuant to Rule 

18.1(c) requesting that the mandate be issued immediately. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c). The 

motion is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is instructed to issue the mandate immediately. 

See id. 

It is so ORDERED on September 25, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
|Exhibit 99.3


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of e.Digital Corporation (the Company) for the quarter
ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ ALFRED H. FALK

Alfred H. Falk, Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ RAN FURMAN

Ran Furman, Chief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE

ARMANDO MADRID,

RELATOR. §

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00290

- CR

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus

against the Honorable Martin Muncy, Judge of the 109th District Court of Andrews, Texas, and

concludes Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefor e deny the

petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and H ughes, JJ.