alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Ziegler Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries financial statements and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,769,914
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,933,322
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                          8,240,000<F1>
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         85,794,847<F2>
<PP&E>                                       8,879,613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             167,477,107
<SHORT-TERM>                                55,958,913<F3>
<PAYABLES>                                  12,490,153<F4>
<REPOS-SOLD>                                 7,324,000
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                 19,189,971<F5>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,544,030
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,750,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               167,477,107
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0<F6>
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                         5,100,178
<COMMISSIONS>                                        0<F6>
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>               40,795,829<F6>
<FEE-REVENUE>                                9,276,918
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,325,050
<COMPENSATION>                              30,874,441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                555,237
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     353,737
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   353,737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15<F7>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14<F7>
<FN>
<F1>Short-term investments includes securities purchased under resale
agreements as a short-term investment vehicle.
<F2>Financial instruments includes securities inventory, investment in
leases, notes receivable and investment in and receivables from
affiliates.
<F3>Includes short-term notes payable and unsecured notes payable to banks
under line of credit agreements.
<F4>Includes payable to customers, payable to broker-dealers, accounts payable,
and dividends payable.
<F5>Includes bonds payable and notes payable to banks other than line of
credit borrowings.
<F6>Revenue from investment banking activities also includes revenue from
trading activities and commissions.
<F7>In response to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards #128, earnings
per share are being disclosed as basic EPS and diluted EPS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50209 

Summary Calendar

 

JOSE E. RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LAUREL RIDGE HOSPITAL,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(SA-96-CV-430)

 

January 16, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We affirm the district court’s ruling dismissing Rodriguez’

claims of race discrimination, harassment and failure to promote

since Rodriguez did not make any of these allegations in his

discrimination charge with the EEOC. Anderson v. Lewis Rail Serv.

Co., 868 F.2d 774, 775 (5th Cir. 1989). 
2

We also affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment

on Rodriguez’ claim of sex discrimination since there are no

genuine issues of material fact as Rodriguex has failed to

establish a prima facie case of sex discrimination. McDonnellDouglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 (1973).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME AND STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,823,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,670,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,653,082
<PP&E>                                     172,237,182
<DEPRECIATION>                              87,085,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             158,501,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,050,396
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,504,487
<COMMON>                                       160,285
<OTHER-SE>                                (35,780,419)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               158,501,665
<SALES>                                      2,686,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,433,281
<CGS>                                        2,000,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,915,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,724,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,182,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                609,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                   359,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            250,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   250,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.3

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a
Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2013 (the Agreement), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities
Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as special servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as operating advisor, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the Certificate
Administrator), and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, the following:

1. A review of the Companys activities as Certificate
Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2015 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2015, the Company has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned
as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: February 26, 2016



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 130

Electing Members to a certain standing committee of the House of 

Representatives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2003

Mr. MENENDEZ submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Electing Members to a certain standing committee of the 

House of Representatives.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and 

2 are hereby, elected to the following standing committee of 

3 the House of Representatives: 

4 COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT: 

5 Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. Green of Texas, Ms. Roybal-Al6 lard, and Mr. Doyle.

Æ
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 16, 2014

NO. 03-14-00241-CV

Ernest Wayne Rials, Appellant

v.

Linda Katherine Rials, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED ON AGREED MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on January 24, 2014. The parties 

filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees 

that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the 

appeal. Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the 

court below, and this decision shall be certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Edward A. Machulak, Executive Vice President and Secretary of Commerce
Group Corp., (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.  the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31,
    2005, (the "Form 10-K"), fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.

Date:  July 5, 2005                 /s/ Edward A. Machulak
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Edward A. Machulak
                                    Executive Vice President,
                                    and Secretary
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 1

The E-Government Act of 2002

by Jeffrey L. Schildkraut

Originally Posted: February 26, 2003

The Electronic Government Act of 2002 was signed into law on December 17, 2002. "Electronic Government" is defined as

the Government use of "web-based Internet applications or other information technology to enhance the access to and

delivery of government information and services to the public, other agencies, and other Government entities; or to bring

about improvements in Government operations that may include effectiveness, efficiency, service quality, or transformation."

The E-Government Act of 2002 establishes a new agency within the Office of Management and Budget, the Office of

Electronic Government, which will be responsible for electronic information management and for promoting interagency

cooperation to improve public services.

The act creates a Chief Information Council that will work with other Federal agencies and State and local governments to

help develop electronic technology policies, requirements, and strategies. An E-Government Fund was also established to

provide funding for projects intended to allow for easier public access to information, improved government services and

transactions, and enhanced agency information technology project coordination and planning.

The Office of Electronic Government will co-administer the E-Government fund (along with GSA) to implement electronic

government initiatives and provide money for interagency electronic technology projects. The agency is also responsible for

developing and promoting solutions to allow the "integrated delivery" of government services electronically. Under this act,

government services could eventually be searched for by function or topic, rather than by separate agency or department.

Other anticipated benefits include improved government performance by organizing electronic information technology for

uses such as procurement, recruitment, and workforce development. The new legislation specifically authorizes funding for

the use of electronic signatures and Federal portal (Firstgov.gov) improvements, and it requires regulatory agencies and

courts to establish websites to post actions, judgements, and judicial rulings. The Office of Electronic Government will

establish information resource policies and review the performance of each agency to manage electronic technology. The

agency also will help identify information technology opportunities to improve the efficiency of government-to-business

transactions.

Source: "E-Government Act of 2002," Public Law 107-347, December 17, 2002, on the Internet at http://

www.access.gpo.gov/, visited February 25, 2003.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Division of Information and Marketing Services, PSB Suite 2850, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC

20212-0001 | www.bls.gov/OPUB | Telephone: 1-202-691-5200 | Contact Us
EXHIBIT 99.4

CONSENT OF INTERNAL QUALIFIED RESERVES EVALUATOR

I
consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of Talisman Energy Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, of my Report on Reserves Data dated March 8, 2010, included in the 2009 Annual Information Form of Talisman Energy Inc. (the "AIF"), and to the references to
my name in the AIF.

I
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



of
my Report on Reserves Data dated March 8, 2010 and to the references to my name in the AIF, which are incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F.

By:

/s/ MICHAEL ADAMSCalgary, Canada
March 8, 2010



Michael Adams
Internal Qualified Reserves Evaluator


16

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DONALD CAMPBELL, a/k/a Louis Butler,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-00-290-AW, CA-02-3815-AW)

Submitted: September 11, 2003 Decided: September 24, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Mythili Raman, Gina Laurie

Simms, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Donald Campbell seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct.

1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S.

941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Campbell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we

deny Campbell’s motion for a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 27, 2016

d0919

Order 

Clerk

September 27, 2016

149647

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149647

COA: 315236

St. Joseph CC: 12-017655-FH

ERIK PAUL GUTIERREZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of November 25, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 

2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

People v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been 

decided on July 29, 2015, 498 Mich 358 (2015), the application is again considered. 

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part 

the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the St. Joseph 

Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different 

sentence under the sentencing procedure described in Lockridge. On remand, the trial 

court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court 

determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional 

constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial 

court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the 

unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other 

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Stephen L. Mueller, Vice President, Finance and Administration, Secretary and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/  Stephen L. Mueller
-----------------------------------------------
Stephen L. Mueller
Vice President, Finance and Administration
Secretary & Treasurer

July 29, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Encysive
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

 X       Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange 
         Act of   1934 For the quarterly period ended 6/30/96

         Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange 
         Act of  1934 (No fee required)

For the transition period from           to

Commission file number 1-11586
                       -------

                                PTI HOLDING INC.
                  --------------------------------------------
                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)


      Delaware                                                   13-3590980
----------------------                                        ----------------
(State or jurisdiction                                        (I.R.S.Employer
of incorporation or                                         Identification No.)
organization)


c/o 15 E. North Street, Dover, DE                                       19901
---------------------------------------                              ----------
(Address of principal executive offices)                             (Zip Code)


                          (302) 678-0855
                     -------------------------
         (Issuer's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)


(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last 
     Report)

         Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the  registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days.

Yes  X    No


         State the number of shares  outstanding  of each class of the  issuer's
classes of common  equity,  as of the latest  practicable  date. As of August 9,
1996, 3,478,436 shares of the issuer's common equity were outstanding.

<PAGE>


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has 
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

Dated:  August   , 1996


                           PTI HOLDING INC.




                           By/s/ Meredith W. Birrittella
                             ---------------------------
                             Meredith W. Birrittella,
                             Chief Executive Officer (authorized signatory)
                             Chief Financial Officer