alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2





OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel M. Walker, Senior Vice President of Accounting and Finance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: November 14, 2002


/s/    DANIEL M. WALKER


---

Daniel M. Walker


Senior Vice President


of Accounting and Finance


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 883.

#### Knight *v.*Ohio.

May 20, 1946.

327 U. S. 808.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 354 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

820 Elmwood Avenue in Providence, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Sister Ann 

Keefe Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2015 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 820 Elmwood Avenue in Providence, Rhode 

Island, as the ‘‘Sister Ann Keefe Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SISTER ANN KEEFE POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 820 Elmwood Avenue in Provi6 dence, Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Sister Ann Keefe Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 354 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sister Ann Keefe Post 

3 Office’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered May 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00574-CV

IN RE PATRICK BERNARD INGRAM, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. W01-01902-K(A)

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Lloyd Blonder,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of National Technical Systems, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over  financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
|          | /s/ LLOYD BLONDER                      |
|----------|----------------------------------------|
|     | Lloyd Blonder,                         |
| * * | *Senior  Vice President and Treasurer* |
| * * | *(Principal  Financial Officer)*       |
| * * | April 28,  2005                   |

 

----
Securities and Exchange Commission  Judiciary Plaza  450 Fifth Street NW   Washington DC 20549

 

RE:	Saturna Investment Trust, File #33-13247

 

July 27, 2006

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of the referenced Trust and pursuant to Rule 497 (j), we wish to  certify that the form of the recently filed Prospectus and Statement of Additional  Information for CIK #0000811860, Saturna Investment Trust, that would have been  filed under Rule 497 paragraph (b) or (c) would not have differed from that  contained in the most recent registration or amendment, and that the text has  been filed electronically.

If you have any questions or comments concerning this filing, kindly contact  me at (360) 734-9900 x303.
OFFi©&£LrL_.„_.

STAT£WF%lxAS'

^EMALTYFOR ''/:

fE USE' ?>

^

Ausnrm

OFFICIATSKrMBFROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS PQKS)8 .CAEITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

iw,<

0 2 1M.

Ionian "/two pages..,. He also did no, include ao^«g*TM>«*

his memorandum.

FEB03 2015

QUIRINO MACHIN SANCHEZ

MOORE (MTC) - IPC #1665404

UTF

"I
_


first amendment

to the

amended and restated employment agreement

MARCH 15, 2009

WHEREAS, TESCO CORPORATION, a corporation organized under the laws of the province of Alberta, Canada (the "Company") and JULIO M. QUINTANA ("Executive") entered into the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective on December 31, 2008 (the "Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, notwithstanding the approval by the compensation committee and the board of directors of the Company of an increase in Executive's Base Annual Salary commencing January 1, 2009 to $480,000, the parties recognize that Executive has voluntarily refrained from drawing that increased Base Annual Salary to date; and

WHEREAS, Executive and the Company have now agreed that commencing March 15, 2009, Executive's Base Annual Salary to be actually paid for the remainder of 2009 shall be equal to the amount of Executive's Base Annual Salary for the same portion of 2008, reduced by 10% ("Reduction"); and

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive agree that such Reduction alone shall not constitute a Good Reason under the Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the definition of Base Annual Salary for the calculation of certain benefits provided under the Agreement for the calendar year 2009;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed as follows: 

1.The following shall be added at the end of the Section 5(b):
"For the purposes of calculating the STIP for the calendar year 2009, Base Annual Salary shall mean the amount approved by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors in November 2008 which is $480,000, without regard as to the actual amount of Base Annual Salary paid to Executive for the calendar year 2009."


2.New subsection 7(j) shall be added as follows:
"(j)Certain Definitions for Calendar year 2009.  For the purposes of calculating amounts payable under Sections 7(c), (d) and (e) during the calendar year 2009, Base Annual Salary shall mean the amount approved by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors in November 2008 which is $480,000 without regard as to the actual amount of Base Annual Salary paid to Executive for the calendar year 2009."




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement effective as of March 15, 2009.

EXECUTIVE:



/s/ Julio M. Quintana

Julio M. Quintana







 

EMPLOYER:



Tesco Corporation



 

By:  /s/ Norman W. Robertson

Norman W. Robertson

Chairman of the Board of Directors

of the Company
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
     I, Jay Higham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
     18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

                 1.        The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of
                           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                 2.        The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                /s/:Jay Higham
                                                    -----------------------
                                                    Jay Higham
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    August 11, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ARTHUR ALAN WOLK, PHILIP 

BROWNDIES, AND CATHERINE 

MARCHAND,

Respondents

v.

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LOWER 

MERION,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 481 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the 

remaining issue. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Where a Court of Common Pleas grants a petition by issuing an 

immediately effective injunction, is that order immediately 

appealable of right under Pa.R.A.P. 311(a)(4)?

(2) Is an order of the Court of Common Pleas that enjoined a school 

district from collecting a portion of its 2016 taxes a “final order” as 

to which [Petitioner] must file post-trial motions before taking an 

appeal, even though other and different claims in the case remain 

unaddressed?

(3) May a Court of Common Pleas convert a preliminary injunction 

hearing into a permanent injunction hearing without the consent of 

the parties?
[481 MAL 2017] - 2

The Applications for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae are GRANTED.

Justice Todd did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A
KNOWING OR WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATION.

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

     Re: Nuveen Investments, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the "Company") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

          (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated as of this 8th day of November 2005.


                                        /s/ Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
10.35

    


    AMENDMENT
NUMBER ONE TO

    SALARY
CONTINUATION AGREEMENT

    


    This
Amendment Number One is made as of December 30, 2008, to the Salary Continuation
Agreement dated as of March 14, 2007 (the “Agreement”), by and between Southern
Community Bank and Trust and Jeffrey T. Clark (“Executive”).

    


    1.  The
Agreement is amended by adding the following Paragraph:

    


    “7.16.   Compliance
with ESSA. To the extent that any payment under this Agreement would
constitute a prohibited parachute payment under Section 111(b)(2)(C) of the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”), the Bank agrees to pay
Executive an additional payment equal to the prohibited payment on July 1, 2012,
or if later, the earliest date when Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA no longer
prohibits such payment.  Such payment shall be made in a single lump
sum in cash, without interest.  The Executive may be entitled to
severance payments from multiple agreements and plans with the
Bank.  The Bank, it its sole discretion, shall determine which
payments shall be delayed in order to comply with
ESSA.   Notwithstanding anything in this paragraph to the
contrary, the additional amounts due under the Agreement shall not be paid if
the Treasury Department or other governmental agency issues guidance subsequent
to the date of this Agreement that would prohibit such payment.  A
prohibited parachute payment shall be interpreted in a manner that is consistent
with Notice 2008-TAAP, Notice 2008-94 and all other current or future guidance
issued  pursuant to Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA or Section 280G(e) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.”

    


    2.  No
other terms and conditions of the Agreement are affected by this
Amendment.

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written
above.

    


    
      
        
          
            	
                    SOUTHERN
      COMMUNITY BANK AND TRUST

                  
	 
      
	
                    By:

                  	
                    /s/ F. Scott
      Bauer

                  
	 
      	
                    F.
      Scott Bauer, CEO

                  
	 
      


          

        

      

      
        
          	
                  EXECUTIVE

                
	 
      
	
                   /s/ Jeffrey T.
      Clark

                	
                  (SEAL)

                
	
                  Jeffrey
      T. Clark
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 38696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Alzheimer's Disease Drug Development.
    Date: September 15, 2017.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway, Suite 2W200, 7201 
Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Alexander Parsadanian, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building 2C/212, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2656475455474247484f47484766484f4708484f4e08414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bdcddccfcedcd9dcd3d4dcd3dcfdd3d4dc93d3d4d593dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; AD Sequencing Project Data Analysis.
    Date: September 20, 2017.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway, Suite 2W200, 7201 
Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Alexander Parsadanian, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building 2C/212, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9c9d8cbcad8ddd8d7d0d8d7d8f9d7d0d897d7d0d197ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5958497968481848b8c848b84a58b8c84cb8b8c8dcb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 8, 2017.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-17155 Filed 8-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES BEDFORD FISHER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CR-89-89, CA-96-47)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 8, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Bedford Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Fisher, Nos. CR-89-89; CA-96-47 (W.D. Va.

Oct. 1, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568

(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-30687

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTHONY F. GIAIMIS, also known as Tony Giaimis,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:12-CR-74-3

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Anthony F. Giaimis

in this appeal from the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Giaimis has filed a response wherein he moves to dismiss his 

§ 3582(c)(2) motion without prejudice.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 25, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-30687 Document: 00514849838 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/25/2019
No. 18-30687

2

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Giaimis’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Giaimis’s motion to withdraw his § 3582(c)(2) motion

without prejudice is DENIED. See United States v. Calton, 900 F.3d 706, 710-

11 (5th Cir. 2018).

 Case: 18-30687 Document: 00514849838 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/25/2019