T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON U N I TED STA TES C O U R T O F A PPEA LS FO R TH E N I N TH C I R C U I T SH A N E I . SO PH ER , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. MI CH AE L W AS HI NG T ON ; DI AN E M . R EA ; D I A N N E M I D D LE; STEVEN R. P OW E RS ; DA RC E Y B AK E R; C A N D A C E W H EELER , D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 35925 D. C . No . 3 : 0 5 - c v - 0 6 3 2 2 - HU ME MORA ND UM *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon G a rrM . K i ng, S e ni orD i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r5, 2009

P ort l and, O r e gon B e f o r e : KOZ I NS KI , C h ie f Ju d g e , FI SH ER a nd PA EZ , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P l a i nt i f f ha s c orr e c t l yc onc e de d tha tas t a t e - c ourtpr oc e e di ng i s “ pe ndi ng” w i thi n the m e a ni ng of

Y ounge rv. H arr i s , 401 U . S . 37, 41 ( 1971) . A l though 

# FI LED MA R 11 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSpage 2

p l ai n t i ff fi l edh i s fed eral act i o n fi rst , n o “ p ro ceed i n g s o f su b st an ce o n th e m eri t s” h ado ccu rredi n fed eral co u rtb efo re th e st at e act i o n b eg an . M & A G ab aee v . C m ty. R ed ev el o p m en tA g en cy o f L . A . , 4 1 9 F . 3 d1 0 3 6 , 1 0 4 1 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ); see F resh I n t’l C o rp . v . A g r ic . L ab o rR e la tio n s B d ., 8 0 5 F .2 d1 3 5 3 , 1 3 5 8 n .5 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 6 ) . T h e p e n d in g s ta te - c o u rt a c tio n n o w p r o v id e s p la in tif f w ith a n a d e q u a te opportuni tyt o r a i s e hi s due pr oc e s s c l a i m . S t a t e e x r e l . S ophe rv. W a s hi ngt on ( S ophe rV I ) , 2010 W L 174064, a t*5–6 ( O r . C t . A pp. J an. 20, 2010) . A dj udi c a t i ng S op her’ s c on st i tut i on alcl ai m s w ou l d “ have the pract i ca l ef fe ctof enj oi ni ng ” that pr oc e e di ng thr ough the appl i c a t i on of pr e c l us i on rul e s . A m e r i s our c e B e r ge n C orp. v. R ode n, 495 F . 3d 1143, 1149 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ; s e e G i l be rt s on v. A l br i ght , 381 F .3 d9 6 5 , 9 7 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ( e n b an c ) . P la in tif f d o e s n o t c o n te s t th a t th is s u it i m pl i c a t e s i m port a nts t a t e i nt e r e s t s , norc oul d he . S e e P r e i s e rv. R odr i gue z , 411 U . S . 47 5, 49 1– 92 (197 3). A nd , even i f there w er e e xcept i on alci rc um st ance s coun se l i ng agai nstabst ent i on before S op her V I w as deci ded, i t s j uri sdi ct i on al hol di ng i n pl a i nt i f

f’ s f a vor , 2010 W L 174064, a t*5–6, r e m ove s a ny

“ e xtr a or di na r i l ypr e s s i ng ne e d f ori m m e di a t e f

e de r a l e qui t abl e r e l i e f

. ” K ugl e rv. H e lf a n t, 4 2 1 U .S . 1 1 7 , 1 2 5 ( 1 9 7 5 ) . T h e s ta te c o u rts n o w ap p e arr e a d yto “f a ir ly an dfu ll y a d

ju d icat[e ] th e f

ed er al issu e[ ]. ” I d . at 1 2 4 . A b stain in g o n p lain ti ff’spage 3

due pr oc e s s c l a i m i s the r e f or e pr ope r . S e e M i ddl e s e x C ountyE thi c s C om m . v. G a r d e n S ta te B a rA s s ’n , 4 5 7 U .S . 4 2 3 , 4 3 7 ( 1 9 8 2 ) . N e i the rdi d the di s tr i c tc ourte rri n di s m i s s i ng pl a i nt i f f’ s e qua l pr ot e c t i on a nd e x pos tf

a c t o c l a i m s a s t i m e barr e d. P l a i nt i f f’ s a m e nde d c om pl a i ntdoe s not a l l e ge tha tde f

e nda nt s c onc e a l e d a nyf a c t s tha tw oul d ha ve pr e ve nt e d hi m f r om bri ng i ng tho se cl ai m s i n a t i m el y f as hi on . In fa ct , he di d t i m el y a ss ertthem i n an e a r l i e rs t a t e - c ourta c t i on. E ve n i f he ha dn’ t , both f

r audul e ntc onc e a l m e nta nd e qui t abl e e s t oppe l r e qui r e apl a i nt i f f t o a l l e ge “ s om e a c t i ve c onduc tbythe d e f e n d a n t ab o v e a n db e y o n dth e w r o n g d o in g up o n w h ic h th e p la in tif f’s c la im is fi l ed ” th atth en “ p rev en t [ed ] th e p l ai n t i ff fro m su i n g i n t i m e. ” L u k o v sk y v . C i ty & C o u n tyo f

S .F ., 5 3 5 F .3 d1 0 4 4 , 1 0 5 1

– 5 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e m p h a s is in o r ig in a l) ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m a rk s o m itte d ) . I n th e s e c la im s , p la in tif f f au lts d e f e n d an ts f o rr e v ie w in g h is p ar o le ap p lic a tio n u n d e rth e J A M ru le s r a th e rth an th e M a tr ix S y s te m . T h a t d e f e n d an ts c l a i m e d the yc oul d notappl ythe M a tr i x S y s t e m t o hi m i s n’ tc onduc t“ above a nd b e y o n d ” th e w r o n g d o in g p la in tif f a lle g e s . W h e th e ro rn o t d e f e n d an ts a c tu a lly be l i e ve d w ha tthe ys a i d, thi s w a s al e ga l pos i t i on the ya nnounc e d t o j us t i f ydoi ng w ha tpl a i nt i f

f c l a i m s w a s unl a w f

ul ; i tw a s notaf

a c tpl a i nt i f

f ne e de d t o knowpage 4

be f or e he c oul d br i ng s ui t . P l a i nt i f f ha d a l l the ne c e s s aryi nf orm a t i on t o c ha l l e nge d e f e n d a n ts ’ p o s itio n f

r o m th e m o m e n t h e h e ar dit. O n app ea l , pl ai nt i ff

cont i nu es t o ass erton l y thatdefe nd ant s c on ce al ed w hat a m ount s t o al e ga l pos i t i on, notf a c t s . I tw a s nota n abus e of di s c r e t i on t o de ny le a v e to a m e n din th e s e c ir c u m s tan c e s . S e e A b a g n in in v . A M V A C C h e m . C o rp ., 5 4 5 F .3 d7 3 3 , 7 4 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . AF F I RME D.