alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:     August 31, 2006 | Signed:    /s/ Michael C. Nasser      
|------------------------- | --------------------------------------
|                          | Michael C. Nasser, Corporate Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for National Bank of Commerce, Berkeley, Illinois (“the Receiver”) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of National Bank of Commerce on January 16, 2009. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated: August 17, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-17788 Filed 8-22-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 7 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make permanent the 

removal of the rental cap for durable medical equipment under the 

Medicare program with respect to speech generating devices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 1, 2016 

Mr. VITTER (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make 

permanent the removal of the rental cap for durable 

medical equipment under the Medicare program with 

respect to speech generating devices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Steve Gleason Act of 

5 2016’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 7 IS

1 SEC. 2. MAKING PERMANENT THE REMOVAL OF THE RENT2 AL CAP FOR DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 

3 UNDER MEDICARE WITH RESPECT TO 

4 SPEECH GENERATING DEVICES. 

5 Section 1834(a)(2)(A)(iv) of the Social Security Act 

6 (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(2)(A)(iv)) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘and before October 1, 2018,’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, Michael J. Mack, President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., certify:

 

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from November 1, 2013 through October 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 4, 2013 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2013 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 
| Date:   January 12, 2015 | Deere   Credit Services, Inc. |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          | By                                 | */s/   Michael J. Mack* |   |
|                          |                               | Michael   J. Mack |
|                          |                               | President |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary D. Blackford,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Gary D. Blackford                
|Gary D. Blackford                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 17, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 26, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40235 Summary Calendar

WILLIS FLOYD WILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CARL E. MCKELLAR; NEAL WEBB; MARY BILLUPS; GUILLERMO DELAROSA; ANDRE WATSON; ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CV-331

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Willis Floyd Wiley, Texas prisoner # 753383, appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and on the merits. Wiley does not challenge the district court’s denial of his exhaust claims on the merits, and he does not challenge the district court’s dismissal for failure to exhaust other than his allegations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). These claims are thus deemed abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).No. 05-40235 -2- Wiley asserts that he was not required to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to his ADA claims. Under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), a prisoner must exhaust his administrative remedies before bringing a civil action challenging prison conditions. Wiley was thus required to exhaust his administrative remedies for all his claims, including those raised under the ADA, since they involved matters of prison life.
See Booth v. Churner , 532 U.S. 731, 739, (2001); see also Clifford v. Gibbs , 298 F.3d 328, 332 (5th Cir. 2002). Wiley also contends that he is entitled to relief because the magistrate judge failed to rule on his motion for a temporary restraining order in her report and recommendation. He has not established that he is entitled to relief on this ground. See

F ED . R. C IV . P. 65(a), (b); Sunbeam Prods., Inc. v. West Bend Co. , 123 F.3d 246, 250 (5th Cir. 1997). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The judgment is, however, MODIFIED to reflect that the dismissal of Wiley’s unexhausted claims is WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in an in forma pauperis proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). See Underwood v. Wilson , 151 F.3d 292, 296 (5th Cir. 1998). Wiley’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF THE COMPANY AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 INCLUDED IN THE 10KSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10QSB
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000886093
<NAME> VIKING CAPITAL GROUP, INC
       
<S>                              <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                   APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                           11,832
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                     (59,160)
<INVENTORY>                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 111,147
<PP&E>                           130,900
<DEPRECIATION>                   (26,618)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   242,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1,187,650
<BONDS>                          93,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<COMMON>                         14,423
<OTHER-SE>                       (1,047,163)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     242,047
<SALES>                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 0
<CGS>                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 266,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               (23,809)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (287,288)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (287,288)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (287,288)
<DISCONTINUED>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                      (287,288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (0.020)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (0.020)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended May 31, 2006 of Arrow International, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frederick J. Hirt, the Senior
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge and based upon a review of the
Report, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and periods presented as required by such Report.

     This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, my own due diligence and
representations made by certain other members of the Company's senior
management.

Date: July 10, 2006

                                            /s/ Frederick J. Hirt
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Frederick J. Hirt
                                         Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice
                                         President of Finance
                                         (Principal Financial Officer and Chief
                                         Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 612 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 612

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2015

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE P. KAZEN FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00002-CR

ROGER DEE BENEFIELD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 188th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 46,894-A

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Roger Dee Benefield was arrested for public intoxication by Longview Police Officer 

Larry Solomon at Magrill Plaza in Longview. As Benefield was being transported to jail, he spat 

on Solomon, causing his saliva to come in contact with Solomon’s right hand and right arm. 

Consequently, a Gregg County jury convicted Benefield of harassment of a public servant1and 

assessed him forty-five years in prison, after enhancement. 

In his appeal, Benefield complains that the trial court erred in admitting a 1989 conviction 

for aggravated sexual assault during the guilt/innocence phase of his trial.2 However, we have 

carefully reviewed the record and have found that the only prior conviction admitted during the 

guilt/innocence phase of Benefield’s trial was a 2006 conviction for failure to register as a sex 

offender, which was admitted without objection.3 Benefield did not complain (either at trial or on 

appeal) regarding the admission of evidence pertaining to his conviction for failing to register as a 

sex offender.

 

1See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.11(a)(3) (West Supp. 2017).

2For instance, Benefield argues,

For the defense, arguing that the Defendant should have been believed over the officer became 

impossible when his aggravated sexual assault conviction was admitted. That credibility dispute 

was, as a practical matter, completely resolved by admission of the aggravated sexual assault 

conviction. Juries are swayed quite strongly by previous convictions, particularly for sex crimes, 

because of the horrific nature of the crime combined with the widely-held belief that sex criminals 

are incurable. Once that conviction was admitted, the guilt-innocence phase was essentially over 

and the Defendant was facing twenty-five to life.

Further, Benefield cites Theus v. State, 845 S.W.2d 874 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992), some eight times in his brief. Theus 

is a case involving evidence of a prior conviction introduced during the guilt/innocence phase of a trial. 

3The 1989 conviction for aggravated sexual assault was introduced during the punishment phase of the trial without 

objection and was one of the convictions alleged for enhancement purposes. Extraneous-offense evidence may be 

offered during the punishment phase. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 37.07, § 3(a)(1) (West Supp. 2017).
3

Consequently, we find that Benefield’s complaint is without merit. We overrule his sole 

issue.

For the reasons stated, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: June 20, 2018

Date Decided: June 26, 2018

Do Not Publish
OFFICE OFTHEAmORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS AUSTINEon. Box% **Pord, AdminirrtraEor,**  

### Page5

Act), reads, in pcrtr

*It shall be wzlawful for any stamfmturar or distributor diraotly a.rindlreotly or thrlro;l@

a eubrrldiaryor affiliata,aay ag%nt **or** any employee, or by any oiiioer, **director or**  **f ira**  **member: +**  ***** l **to f** **’ uralah,**  

### give or land anymo5oy**or** 

### other thing of value, oxco& algns, Or to 6xtsnd unusual credit tems, to any petrson

### %ngc&edin call**fng brewary** produots for aonswaption on or off the prepisas ahers eold + l * *
WU **note** from **the** copy **Of** your **adrdnlstraEl9r** intarpratc~ticxama

of various proriafonr at the 

### Taxes Liquor Control **Aat,** that you hare haldr

*The followiag item ham mse atll%t,arIti **V~UO,** but 

### whw **b~ariag pr&%Alf**  dimplayed, the **adrartlsossnt of**  **the buainase**  or brand nese or any sanufaotaare~w **dlatri** butor 

### or **bear,** 

### are **aon8ldared** by the Been3 a6 advartimiug noraltioe and not aa aq~ip- **&wit g** **viz: Beer**  **drinking:** glasses, **tabla baer**  **Eats, asp**  **reaovar~, amm**  **oard8, paper**  **napklnn, aah**  **tray8, marrice**  traya. **The**

### roli0ain~ itemswhenbmrlng~prominentl~diaplapd the **advertisement**.of the bnd.naer or brand 

### mum orariy

### xmaufachrer drd~atrlbutox 

### of boar, and when of a value not arorodlng (16. eaah, are oorraideredby the Board to be aignrrparzaiatrible



### und%rt&o law, t1~1 Thormomtars, bnrometera, oalmdar8, alooks, lrasnu or ltctnso fmmr, mirror6 harlng 8 suriace not exceeding 300 8pusrs inches, outside boneha(l.a Clearly, t&e 

### darha under 

### oansfderation La not a piece 

### 0rsquuijmmnt naeaesary in tba operatiion of a retail 

### boar buuiaeen,~ox soothing ordlmrily used in auoh buainasa. ,Itr**outstanding** wrgosa ia to **advertise,** and to 

### suggefst a aertain type 

### 0rbear**Hon. Bert**  Ford, **A&iiniatr ‘** **ator,** Pago **S**

8810, the derloe ltoelf bainS ln no mumnor esaen

### tie1 **to** the **faeilltation of**  such **sale. It**  **a2pticl to**  **be** maraly **another** method oonasived **by the**  **BIMU lecturer**  **to advertise**  his 

### produot and enoourage the sale tharaof. It 

### is our opinion thet the bevia% may be proparly classittd as an adwwtlslng sign and its usa 

### fa not prohibited **by the**  **Tam18**Liquor Control Aot.

**Accordingly,** you are advlwd **that it**  ts **Oh% opielon**  **of this**  **department, under**  thr **faots as**  **stated above,**  that the display bear sign under 

### considaration may la@tllp **ba uaad**  in the 

### manner described.

Yours vary truly

ATTORNEY GXaNERALOF T=S
Order issued November 6. 2012

in The

(Cniirt uf ipca1i

Fift1! Oiitrirt uf cxa at Ja1taEi

No. 05-12-01463-CV

IN RE HEIDI AMOS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Criminal Court No. 5

I)ailas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA1O-68776-F

ORDER

Before Justices Moseley, FitzGerald. and Myers

Based on the Court’s opinion ofthis date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ ofmandamus.

We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

LANA YERS C

JUSTICE
Exhibit 4.4

     

    Article
III, Section 2 of the Bylaws of the Company has been amended to read as
follows:

    


    The board
of directors shall initially consist of seven (7) members and shall be divided
into three classes as nearly equal in number as possible.  The members
of each class shall be elected for a term of three years and until their
successors are elected or qualified. One class shall be elected by ballot
annually. The board of directors shall be classified in accordance with the
provisions of the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation.  The
provisions of this Section 2 shall not be applicable to directors, if any, to be
elected or appointed by holders of preferred stock of the
Corporation.  The election or appointment of such directors shall be
governed by the provisions contained in the Certificate of Designations for the
Corporation’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A and the
Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation.

    


    Article
III, Section 3 of the Bylaws of the Company has been amended to read as
follows:

    


    Each
director shall at all times be the beneficial owner of not less than 100 shares
of capital stock of the Corporation; provided, however, that no director
appointed in accordance with Section 7(b) of the Standard Provisions contained
in the Certificate of Designations for the Corporation’s Fixed Rate Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A shall be subject to any stock ownership
requirement.