An official website of the United States government 
	  
	Here is how you know
 Department of Labor Logo  United States Department of Labor
 **The .gov means it's official.**
			 Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information,
			make sure you're on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
			 The
			**https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any
			information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
 Follow Us
 
 Release Calendar Blog
 Search button
          Search:


Menu

  Search button
          Search:
	
	  Follow Us Follow Us on X, formerly referred to as Twitter| Release Calendar | Blog
    Home
        About BLS
		History	
		Our Leadership
		Budget and Performance		
		Questions and Answers	
		A-Z Index	
		Glossary	
		Careers at BLS	
		BLS Speakers Available
		Errata  				
		Contact BLSOverview of BLS Statistics
		Guide to Programs & Services
		Demographics
		Industries
		Business Costs
		Occupations
		GeographyResources For
		Business Leaders
		Consumers
		Developers
		Economists
		Investors
		Jobseekers
		Media
		Public Policymakers
		Researcher		
		Students & Teachers
		Survey Respondents
    Subjects
        Inflation & Prices
		Consumer Price Index
		Producer Price Indexes
		Import/Export Price Indexes
		Contract Escalation
		Price Index Research
		Pay & Benefits
		Employment Cost Index
		Employer Costs for Employee Compensation
						Wage Data by Occupation
		Earnings by Demographics
		Earnings by Industry
		County Wages  
		Benefits
		Modeled Wage Estimates		
		Compensation Research
		Strikes & Lockouts
		Wage Records from Unemployment Insurance
		Occupational RequirementsUnemployment
		National Unemployment Rate
		State & Local Unemployment Rates
		Unemployment Research
		Employment
		National Employment
		State & Local Employment
		County Employment 
		Worker Characteristics
		American Indian Report
		Employment Projections
		Job Openings & Labor Turnover Survey
		Business Response Survey
		Employment by Occupation
		Work Experience Over Time
		Business Employment Dynamics
		Foreign Direct Investment
		Employment Research
		Workplace InjuriesProductivity
		Labor and Total Factor Productivity
		Productivity Research
		Spending & Time Use
		Consumer Expenditures
		How Americans Spend Time			
		International
		International Technical Cooperation
		Import/Export Price Indexes
		Geographic Information
		Northeast (Boston-New York)
		Mid-Atlantic (Philadelphia)
		Southeast (Atlanta)
		Midwest (Chicago)
		Southwest (Dallas)
		Mountain-Plains (Kansas City)
		West (San Francisco)
    Data Tools
        Data Retrieval Tools
		BLS Popular Series
		Series Report
		Top Picks, One Screen, Multi-Screen, and Maps
		Data Finder
		Public Data APICharts and Applications
		Charts for Economic News Releases	
		CPI Inflation Calculator	
		Injury and Illness Calculator		
		Pay Measure Comparison
		Demographic Data Sources
		COVID-19 Economic Trends
		Industry Productivity Viewer
		Employment and Wages Data Viewer
		Industry Finder from the Quarterly Census of Employment and WagesCustomized Tables
		U.S. Economy at a Glance
		Regions, States & Areas at a Glance
		Industry at a Glance			
		Text Files
		News Release Tables
		
		More Sources of Data
		Restricted Data Access
		Discontinued Databases
		Questions & Answers
		Special Notices
    Publications
        Latest Publications
		The Economics Daily
		Monthly Labor Review
		Beyond the Numbers
		Spotlight on Statistics
		Reports
		Commissioner's Corner
		Videos
		Career OutlookOccupational Outlook Handbook
		Geographic Profile
		Handbook of Methods
		Research Papers
		Copyright Information
		Contact & Help
		Weekly Update
    Economic Releases
        Latest Releases
		Major Economic Indicators
		Schedules for news Releases
		By Month
		By News Release
		Current Year
		Prior Years
		Archived News ReleasesEmployment & Unemployment
		Monthly
		Quarterly, annual, and other
		Inflation & Prices
		Pay & Benefits & Workplace Injuries
		Productivity & Technology
		Employment Projections
		Regional News Releases
    Classroom
        K-12 Student & Teacher Resources		
        Games & Quizzes
		Student's Desk
		Teacher's Desk
		Questions & Answers
    Beta
        Redesigned News Releases


Overview
                     Concepts
                     Data sources
                     Design
                     CalculationWeighting for summary estimatesWeighting for case and demographic estimatesIncidence rate calculationReliability of SOII estimates
                     Presentation
                     History
                     More Info
                 
                 
              
			                   	
                                  
		
		












	
	
	
	
	Methods Home
        About
		Programs
		Glossarysearch
	                 

				 				 				                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 					
				                
	             Handbook of Methods > 
					                      Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses

                 Handbook of Methods Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Calculation
                     Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses: Calculation
				  
				   				   
			  
			   				
				
				
				
			  				
				
				
				
			  				
				
				
				
			  				
				
				
				
			   



Nonfatal workplace injury and illness data collected for the Survey of Injuries and Illnesses (SOII) are used to tabulate estimates for two separate data series—industry summary estimates (released annually) and more detailed case circumstance and worker characteristic estimates for cases that involved days away from work, job transfer, or restriction (released biennially). For the data on case circumstances and worker characteristics, case data over a two-year reference period are combined into the biennial release. For example, case data from 2021–22 are combined for estimates for that period and are published in 2023.
Part of the estimation process involves weighting sample units and cases to represent all injuries and illnesses from units on the frame from which the sample was selected. Sample unit, case weighting, and calculation of incidence rates are described in the sections that follow.
Weighting for summary estimates
By means of a weighting procedure, sample units represent all units in their state, industry, employment size class, and ownership (private sector, state government, or local government), also referred to as a sampling cell. An original summary weight (OSW) for each sample unit is determined by the inverse of the sampling ratio (number of units selected relative to the number of frame units available for selection) for the sampling cell from which the unit was selected. (See example in SOII Sample design section.)
Prior to the tabulation of summary estimates, the original summary weight for a sample unit is adjusted by numerical factors to account for nonresponse from some sample units, benchmarking the sampling frame to the current survey year, and the occasional inability for some sample units to report data for the unit as it was sampled. A final summary weight (FSW) used in the tabulation of estimates is determined by applying the below factors to the original weight.
Unit nonresponse adjustment factor (UNRAF) is an adjustment made to account for nonrespondents. Because a small proportion of SOII participants do not respond, weights of responding employers in a sampling cell are adjusted to account for nonrespondents by applying a unit nonresponse adjustment factor.
Outlier adjustment factor (OAF) is applied when an establishment experiences a rare circumstance that makes its case count or hours worked unrepresentative of its sampling cell. Including such data with the original sampling weight would have an undue influence on the estimates. For example, an establishment reports an unusually high number of illness cases and comments that these were the result of a severe and uncommon scabies outbreak. The outlier adjustment factor adjusts the unit’s weight to 1 to avoid an overrepresentation of this uncommon occurrence. An adjustment factor to distribute the remaining weighted employment of the outlier unit is also applied to each of the remaining useable units in the sampling cell.
Benchmark factors (BMF) is the procedure of linking the universe file to the reference year of the survey. The sample for a particular survey year must be drawn prior to that year, so that selected establishments may be pre-notified of their obligation to maintain logs throughout the year. As a result, the universe file from which the sampling frame was developed is not current to the reference year of the survey, making it necessary to adjust the data before publication to reflect current employment levels. This procedure is known as benchmarking. For the SOII, all estimates of totals are adjusted by benchmark factors at the state, industry, and ownership level, and at the national, industry, and ownership level as well. The benchmarking procedure requires a source of accurate employment data which can be converted into annual average employment figures at the industry level for which separate estimates are desired. The SOII uses employment data primarily derived from the BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages.
Reaggregation factor (REAG) occurs when, on the occasional instances, a sample unit may be unable to report data for the unit as it was sampled, adjustments are made to account for these situations by applying a reaggregation factor to the unit’s original summary weight. For example, a sample unit that was involved in a merger may report data covering both the original sample unit and the unit or units with which it merged, requiring an adjustment to the weight to account for the additional unit(s) included in the reported data.
Therefore, the final summary weight for a sample unit is determined by the product of the original summary weight and these four adjustment factors, or
FSW= OSW x UNRAF x OAF x BMF x REAG
where,
FSW = final summary weight
OSW = original summary weight
UNRAF = unit nonresponse adjustment factor
OAF = outlier adjustment factor
BMF = benchmark factor
REAG = reaggregation factor
Weighting for case and demographic estimates
This applies to SOII cases involving days away from work (DAFW) and cases with days of job transfer or restriction (DJTR). Each of these cases is weighted by the respective sample unit’s final summary weight with which it is associated. In addition, the final summary weight that is applied to each case is adjusted for several factors to ensure that the number of usable cases that have been submitted are equal to the DAFW and DJTR cases used in the tabulation of summary estimates. These factors are used to adjust for case subsampling (see section on the SOII Sample design for discussion of subsampling) and case nonresponse for those establishments that did not provide information on all cases involving days away from work or cases with job transfer or restriction which occurred in their establishment in the survey year.
At the establishment level and for each of two different case types, the case subsampling factor (CSSF) adjusts for instances in which the submitted number of usable cases with either DAFW or cases with DJTR differs from the number of DAFW and DJTR cases reported on the summary. For example, suppose 18 DAFW cases and 21 DJTR cases are reported on the sample unit’s summary; to minimize the burden on the respondent, only 3 DAFW and 5 DJTR case forms are submitted and used. This CSSF is designed to weight the number of DAFW and DJTR cases for which usable data were reported to equal the total number of DAFW and DJTR cases indicated on the summary (that is, the number of DAFW and DJTR cases that the establishment experienced). A maximum threshold is applied to this factor, beyond which further adjustments are accomplished through other factors described below. The CSSF is calculated for each case type and is defined as the ratio of cases reported on the summary to the number of cases for which case data were submitted, or
CSSFDAFW=DAFW cases (summary)DAFW cases (submitted)andCSSFDJTR=DJTR cases (summary)DJTR cases (submitted)
Case nonresponse adjustment factor (CNRAF) is applied at the sampling cell level by case type (i.e., DAFW and DJTR). The CNRAF is applied after the CSSF in instances where the CSSF failed to adequately adjust reported summary DAFW and DJTR cases to equal the submitted usable DAFW and DJTR cases for a sampling cell. The CNRAF is designed to adjust for cases that were not reported as a result of nonresponse within the sampling cell. A maximum threshold is applied to this factor, beyond which further adjustments are accomplished through the CRAF discussed below. The CNRAF is calculated for each case type as
CNRAFDAFW=∑FSWBMFx DAFW cases (summary)FSWBMFx CSSF x DAFW cases (usable)and
CNRAFDJTR=∑FSWBMFx DJTR cases (summary)FSWBMFx CSSF x DJTR cases (usable)
where,
FSW = final summary weight;
BMF = benchmark factor; and
CSSF = case subsampling factor for the case type.
Case ratio adjustment factor (CRAF) is applied after both the CSSF and CNRAF factors have been applied but have failed to adjust for missing cases. The CRAF is applied at the estimation cell level (target estimation industry and size class) by case type (i.e., DAFW and DJTR). The CRAF is calculated as
CRAFDAFW=FSW x DAFW casessummaryFSW x CSSF x CNRAF x DAFW casesusableand
CRAFDJTR=FSW x DJTR casessummaryFSW x CSSF x CNRAF x DJTR casesusable
where,
FSW = final summary weight;
CSSF = case subsampling factor for the case type; and
CNRAF = case nonresponse adjustment factor for the case type.
Incidence rate calculation
Incidence rates are calculated using the total case counts obtained through the weighting and benchmarking procedures described above. The adjusted estimates for a particular characteristic, such as injury and illness cases involving days away from work, are aggregated to the appropriate level of industry detail. The total is multiplied by 200,000 for injuries and illnesses combined and for injuries only (that is, 40 hours per week multiplied by 50 weeks—the base of hours commonly regarded as worked by 100 full-time employees during a calendar year). The product is then divided by the weighted and benchmarked estimate of hours worked as reported in the SOII for the industry segment. The formula for calculating the incidence rate is as follows:
Sum of characteristics reportedx 200,000Sum of number of hours worked
Incidence rates for higher levels of industry detail are produced using aggregated weighted and benchmarked totals. Incidence rates may be computed by industry, employment size, state, various case circumstances, and select worker characteristics. Incidence rates for illnesses and for case and worker characteristic categories are published per 10,000 full-time employees, using 20,000,000 hours instead of 200,000 hours in the formula shown above. (The 20,000,000 hours refers to 10,000 full-time employees working 40 hours per week, 50 weeks per year.) Incidence rates per 10,000 workers can be converted to rates per 100 workers by moving the decimal point left two places and rounding the resulting rate to the nearest tenth.
Reliability of SOII estimates
Estimates from the SOII are based on a scientifically selected probability sample, rather than a census of the entire population. (See section on SOII Sample design.) Sampling methodology makes it possible to collect data from a sample from which inferences can be made regarding the characteristics of the population from which the sample was selected. These sample-based estimates may differ from the results obtained from a census of the population. The sample used for the SOII was one of many possible samples, each of which could have produced different estimates. The variation in the sample estimates across all possible samples that could have been drawn is measured by the relative standard error (RSE), which is used to calculate a confidence interval around a sample estimate.
The 95-percent confidence interval is the interval centered on the sample estimate and includes all values that are within 1.96 times the estimate's standard error. If several different samples were selected and used to estimate a population value (such as injury and illness incidence rates), the 95-percent confidence interval would include the true population value approximately 95 percent of the time.
To calculate the 95-percent confidence range given an RSE:
Divide the RSE by 100 and multiply by the survey estimate to determine the standard error.
Multiply the standard error by 1.96 to determine the confidence error.
The survey estimate plus or minus the confidence error is the 95-percent confidence range.For example, in 2014 the total injury and illness case incidence rate for nursing care facilities (NAICS 6231) was 7.4 cases per 100 full-time workers, with an estimated RSE of 1.2 percent.
Divide 1.2 by 100 and multiply by 7.4 for a standard error of 0.0888.
Multiply the 0.0888 standard error by 1.96 to get a confidence error of 0.174
Hence, we are 95-percent confident that the interval between 7.2 and 7.6 (or 7.4 ± (1.96 × 7.4 × 0.012)) includes the true value of the incidence rate for total recordable injury and illness cases in nursing care facilities in 2014.All estimates derived from a sample survey are subject to sampling and nonsampling errors. Sampling errors occur because observations are made on a sample, not on the entire population. Percent-relative standard errors, which are a measure of the sampling error in the estimates, are calculated as part of the SOII estimation process. Both the estimates and the percent-relative standard errors of the estimates can be found at the Industry Injury and Illness Data webpage. Relative standard error estimates for case circumstances and worker characteristic data may be obtained by contacting IIFStaff@bls.gov.
Nonsampling errors in the estimates can be attributed to many sources. Some examples are the inability to obtain information about all cases in the sample, mistakes in recording or coding the data, or definitional difficulties. Although not measured, nonsampling errors will always occur when statistics are gathered. To minimize the nonsampling errors in the estimates, standard procedures are applied to each respondent’s information. Completed survey forms are automatically reviewed to ensure the consistency and viability of each case, followed by manual review at the regional and national offices, and apparent inconsistencies are verified with the employer.

				    				   
				   				   
                 Last Modified Date: November 08, 2023 Facebook
 Twitter
 LinkedIn


Home
   Subjects
   Data Tools
   Publications
   Economic Releases
   Classroom
   Beta


**U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics**
Division of Information and Marketing Services 
PSB Suite 2850 
2 Massachusetts Avenue NE  
Washington, DC 20212-0001 Telephone:1-202-691-5200 Telecommunications Relay Service:7-1-1 www.bls.gov/OPUB Contact Us
 resources  Inspector General (OIG)
								Budget and Performance	
								Department of Labor Grants									
								No Fear Act
								USA.gov
								Vote.gov
 about the site  Sitemap						
								Freedom of Information Act
								Privacy and Security Statement
								Disclaimers
								Linking and Copyright Info	
								Important Website Notices
								Help and Tutorials
								Babel Notice: accessing language services


Twitter Youtube Email


- Publications
- Handbook of Methods