alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors
City National Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-01993, 333-87719, 333-61854, 333-88118,
33-56632, 333-151375, 333-139215 and 333-161964) on Form S-8, (Nos. 333-104395 and 333-163437-01) on
Form S-4 and (No. 333-156275) on Form S-3ASR of City National Corporation of our reports dated February 26, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of City National Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, equity and comprehensive income,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of City National Corporation.

Our
report on the consolidated financial statements refers to changes in 2009 in City National Corporation's method of accounting for noncontrolling interests and participating
securities, and in 2008 City National Corporation changed its method of accounting for fair value.

KPMG LLP

Los
Angeles, California
February 26, 2010

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: 

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2013-A (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 

2.

Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.

I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5.

All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following 

unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee. 

Date:  March 18, 2014 

  /s/ Brian T. Stevens
Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller                             (senior officer of Servicer in charge of servicing function)
IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

JOHNATHAN RENARD CASTANEDA §

§

VS. § CASE NO.

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

NOW COMES, the appellant, Johnathan Renard Castaneda, by and through his

assistant public defender Jani Maselli Wood, and respectfully moves the Court to grant

an additional thirty days to file the petition for discretionary review and for god cause

would show:

I.

Mr. Castaneda was convicted of murder and aggravated sexual assault in two

separate cases. He was sentenced to a mandatory life sentence for the sexual assault case

and 45 years in prison for the murder. The Court of appeals affirmed both cases on

November 10, 2015, in one unpublished opinion. Johnathan Renard Castaneda v. State,

2015 WL 6930466, 01-14-00389-CR, 01-14-00390-CR (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist.] 

November 10, 2015, no pet. h.).

PD-1591&1592-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 12/7/2015 2:24:32 PM

Accepted 12/7/2015 3:34:36 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
II.

The petition is due on December 10, 2015. Mr. Castaneda is requesting an

additional thirty days to prepare the petition until January 9, 2016.

III.

Undersigned counsel’s reason for the request is:

Hearings:

November 17 & 19, 2015 - Hearing on Motion for New Trial in Herman Whitfield v. State

Filings and Oral Arguments:

11/10/2015 - PDR filed in Jimmy Earl Van-Cleave v. State, PD 1253-15

10/28/2015 - Oral argument in Marcus Jamez Lewis v. State, 14-14-00779-CR

10/26/2015 - PDR filed in William Johnson v. State, 1254-15

10/22/2015 - Oral argument in Mary Kuol v. State, 14-14-01008-CR

10/19/2015 - Motion for Reconsideration en banc filed in Carlton Penright v. State, 01-12-

00647-CR

10/16/2015 - Motion for new trial filed in Herman Whitfield v. State, Cause Number

1424070

Personal

Counsel had a medical procedure and missed work on December 3-4, 2015.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant respectfully prays that

this Court grant an additional 30 days for the petition for discretionary review.

-2-
Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County Texas 

/s/ Jani Maselli Wood

_______________________

JANI J. MASELLI WOOD

Assistant Public Defender 

State Bar Number 00791195

Harris County Texas 

1201 Franklin, 13th Floor

Houston Texas 77002

(713) 368-0001

(713) 368-9278 (Fax)

Jani.Maselli@pdo.hctx.net

Attorney for Appellant,

Johnathan Renard Castaneda

-3-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. Proc. 9.5, this certifiesthat on December 7, 2015, a copy

of the foregoing was emailed to the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and

emailed to counsel for the state and the State Prosecuting Attorney’s Office (through

texfile.com) at the following address:

Eri Kugler

Assistant District Attorney

1201 Franklin Street, 6th Floor

Houston, TX 77002

kugler_eric@dao.hctx.net

Lisa McMinn

Lisa.McMinn@SPA.texas.gov

/s/ Jani J Maselli Wood

___________________________________

JANI J. MASELLI WOOD

-4-
#### H. K. PORTER CO., Inc. v. BREMER.

No. 27444.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E D.

Nov. 22, 1950.

Norman A. Emery, and Harrington, Huxley & Smith, all of Youngstown, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Osborne Mitchell, and Mitchell, Mitchell & Reed, all of Youngstown, Ohio, for defendant.

FREED, District Judge.

This is an action for money damages in which it is alleged that defendant sold the assets of a certain corporation to the plaintiff, warranting that the inventories of the corporation were valued at “cost or market, whichever was lower” or at “market” in the case of slow moving or obsolete inventories, and charging that the inventories *90were overvalued within the meaning of the purchase agreement.

The defendant moves to strike and to make more definite and certain.

The motion to strike is aimed at paragraph six of the complaint (which alleges that plaintiff had accountants audit the affairs of the corporation subsequent to the purchase), at paragraph ten of the complaint (which charges an overvaluation of inventories), at paragraph eleven (which alleges that some of the overvalued slow moving inventory has been disposed of), and at paragraph thirteen (which purports to reserve to the plaintiff the right to file further claims if investigation warrants) .

The motion to strike is predicated on the ground that the matter sought to be excluded is immaterial, evidentiary or con-clusory.

This Court has repeatedly asserted that motions to strike are not regarded with favor. Generally speaking they should be granted only where the allegations are clearly immaterial to tjje controversy and are prejudicial to the defendant. Matter which may be described as “evidence” or “conclusions” need not necessarily be stricken so long as it assists in clarifying what is at issue. The motion to strike is in short a method whereby the court can regulate the pleadings to prevent real harm to the movant.

Perhaps the complaint here is not as precise as defendant would prefer it to be, nonetheless it certainly does not violate that mandate and the matter which is sought to be stricken is not clearly unrelated to the controversy or prejudicial to the defendant. The motion to strike will in all particulars be overruled.

The complaint is not so indefinite that defendant can not frame a responsive pleading and his motion to have the complaint made more definite and certain will be denied. Defendant has at his disposal the provisions of Chapter V of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to elidit the information he desires to obtain.
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, Michael J. Mack, Jr., President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., certify:

 

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from November 1, 2014 through October 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 10, 2013 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2013 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 
| Date: January 15,   2016 | Deere Credit   Services, Inc. |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          | By                                 | */s/ Michael J. Mack, Jr.* |
|                          |                               |  

Michael J.   Mack, Jr. |
|                          |                               |  

President |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 452 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 452

  To provide lethal weapons to the Government of Ukraine in order to 
   defend itself against Russian-backed rebel separatists in eastern 
                                Ukraine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 2015

   Mr. Inhofe (for himself, Mr. Portman, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Roberts, Mr. 
    Rubio, Mr. Wicker, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Cotton, Mr. 
Boozman, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Thune, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Vitter, Mrs. Capito, Mr. 
 Rounds, and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide lethal weapons to the Government of Ukraine in order to 
   defend itself against Russian-backed rebel separatists in eastern 
                                Ukraine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense of Ukraine Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO PROVIDE LETHAL WEAPONS TO THE GOVERNMENT OF 
              UKRAINE.

    The President is authorized to provide lethal weapons to the 
Government of Ukraine in order to defend itself against Russian-backed 
rebel separatists in eastern Ukraine.

SEC. 3. REPORTS TO CONGRESS.

    (a) Strategy.--Not later than 15 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a written 
report setting forth a comprehensive strategy of the United States to 
provide lethal weapons to the Government of Ukraine so that it may 
effectively defend itself from Russian-back rebel aggression.
    (b) Implementation of Strategy.--
            (1) Reports required.--Not later than 90 days after 
        submitting the report required under subsection (a), and every 
        90 days thereafter, the President shall submit to Congress a 
        written report setting forth a current comprehensive 
        description and assessment of the implementation of the 
        comprehensive strategy set forth in the report required under 
        such subsection.
            (2) Updates.--If the President makes a substantive change 
        to the comprehensive strategy required under subsection (a), 
        the President shall immediately submit a written report to 
        Congress that articulates the change, the reason for the 
        change, and the effect of the change on the overall 
        comprehensive strategy.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.01

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors and Stockholder
Commercial Credit Company:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-18208, 33-27241 (and the related offerings of securities registered
under Registration Statement No. 33-10444), 33-28723, 33-35618, 33-39857,
33-43351, 33-51814, 33-50513, 33-56553, 33-59415, 333-00055, 333-13311,
333-28847 and 333-44181) on Form S-3 of Commercial Credit Company of our report
dated January 25, 1999, with respect to the consolidated statement of financial
position of Commercial Credit Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998
and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholder's equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 1998
annual report on Form 10-K of Commercial Credit Company.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 15, 1999
<PAGE>  



                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP     Exhibit (23)





            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our reports included or incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K, into CMS Energy Corporation's previously filed Registration
Statements No. 33-9732, No. 33-29681, No. 33-47629, No. 33-64044, No. 33-
51877, No. 33-57719, No. 33-60007, No. 33-61595, No. 33-62573 and No. 333-
01261.






                                    /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                    ------------------------


Detroit, Michigan,
   March 13, 1996.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32





GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Entertainment Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated April 14, 2010






/s/ Richard KozubackRichard KozbuackPresident & Chief Executive Officer/s/ James YeagerJames YeagerSenior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
| Date:      August 13, 2009 |                                  |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                       |                                  |   |
|                       | /s/ ROBERT PUTNAM                     |   |
|                       |                                  |   |
|                       | Robert      Putnam,                   |
|                       | Interim      Chief Accounting Officer |
|                       | (Principal      Financial Officer)    |
|                       |                                  |   |
| Date:      August 13, 2009 |                                  |
|                       |                                  |   |
|                       | /s/ ALFRED H. FALK                    |   |
|                       | Alfred      H. Falk,                  |
|                       | President      and CEO,               |
|                       | (Principal      ExecutiveOfficer)     |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0119

IN THE MATTER OF:

W.R.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 27, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 24 2020

06/24/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0119
Exhibit 10.27

 

FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT

 

THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the 13th day of  May, 2011, by and among Roundy’s Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Roundy’s Supermarkets, Inc. (f/k/a/ “Roundy’s, Inc.”), a Wisconsin corporation (“Roundy’s”) and Robert A. Mariano (“Executive”).

 

The Company, Roundy’s and Executive are parties to an “Executive Agreement” dated as of June 6, 2002, and amended as of February 21, 2007, June 5, 2008, March 25, 2009 and May 12, 2010 (collectively, as amended, the “Original Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, Executive has acquired certain shares of the capital stock of the Company and is employed by Roundy’s.  The parties wish to amend the Original Agreement pursuant to the terms herein.

 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree that Section 13(a) of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to change the word “ninth” as it appears in that section to “tenth.”  In all other respects the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its original terms.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Fifth Amendment, as of the date first written above.

 

 

	
ROUNDY’S ACQUISITION CORP.
    	
ROUNDY’S   SUPERMARKETS, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   John R. Willis
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Edward G. Kitz
    
	
 
    	
John   R. Willis, Vice President & Sec’y
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Edward   G. Kitz, Group V. P. - Legal, Risk & Treasury
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
EXECUTIVE:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/   Robert A. Mariano
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Robert   A. Mariano
    


 

By their signatures below, the undersigned “Investors” (as that term is defined in the Original Agreement), collectively holding a majority of the common and preferred stock of the Company, hereby consent to and approve the foregoing Fifth Amendment to Executive Agreement.

 

	
WILLIS STEIN &   PARTNERS III, L.P.
    	
WILLIS   STEIN & PARTNERS DUTCH III-A, L.P.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Avy H. Stein
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Avy H. Stein
    
	
 
    	
Avy   H. Stein, Manager
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Avy   H. Stein, Manager
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
WILLIS STEIN &   PARTNERS DUTCH III-B, L.P.
    	
WILLIS   STEIN & PARTNERS III-C, L.P.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Avy H. Stein
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Avy H. Stein
    
	
 
    	
Avy   H. Stein, Manager
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Avy   H. Stein, Manager
Exhibit 32.2

OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Kees, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2011 |  |                                                  
|                   |  | /s/ ROBERT L. KEES                               
|                   |  | Robert L. Kees                                   
|                   |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                   |  | (Principal financial officer)                    



31