alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17964]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EF17-2-000; EF17-3-000; EF17-4-000]


Notice of Filing; Bonneville Power Administration

    Take notice that on August 10, 2017, Bonneville Power 
Administration submitted a Second Errata to its July 31, 2017 tariff 
filing per: BP-18 Power and Transmission Rates.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#12545740515d7c7e7b7c77416762627d606652747760713c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a1e7e4f3e2eecfcdc8cfc4f2d4d1d1ced3d5e1c7c4d3c28fc6ced7">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on August 30, 2017.

    Dated: August 16, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17964 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 99                                                          Page 1 of 1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OFT THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


                               ------------------


         I, Anthony C. Papalia,  Principal  Executive  and  Principal  Financial
Officer of Chefs International, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (a)      the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the Company for the year
                  ended January 26, 2003, which this  certification  accompanies
                  (the "Periodic Report"),  fully complies with the requirements
                  of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

         (b)      the  information  contained  in  the  Periodic  Report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:   April 25, 2003

                                               s/ Anthony C. Papalia
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Anthony C. Papalia
                                        Principal Executive and
                                               Principal Financial Officer
                                        Chefs International, Inc.


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Chefs  International,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by Chefs
International,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.






                                       1
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the

Annual Report of Commerce Group Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the

fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") for the

purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the

United States Code.



I, Sidney Sodos, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial

Officer of Commerce Group Corp., (the "Company"), hereby certify,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.   the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended

March 31, 2007, (the "Form 10-K/A"), fully complies with the

requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934; and



2.   the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of

the Company.



Date:  July 14, 2008                      /s/ Sidney Sodos

-----------------------------------

Sidney Sodos

Vice President, Treasurer

and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


Consent of Independent Public Accountants


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report on Chittenden Corporation dated January 13, 2000,
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-80747) and Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-81197, 333-58133, 333-25531, 333-25765). Our report dated January 15, 1999
included in Chittenden Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998 is no longer appropriate since restated financial
statements have been presented giving effect to a business combination accounted
for as a pooling-of-interests.


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 14, 2000
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133848 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133848 COA: 266514 Wayne CC: 04-012441-01 ARBEN KALAJ, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 29, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

l0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 22

- 00198

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 48th Di strict Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 048

- 318629

- 20

Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, CJ.; and Kerr, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### O LU 

### A SEKUN AND 

### T HE 

### L AW 

### O FFICE OF 

### O LU 

### A SEKUN



### , P.C.

, Appellants

V



### .

O LUREMI 

### O YEKOLA



### , AND 

### A DEMOLE 

### A KAN DE 

### , Appellees2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant s’ “ Motion to W ithdraw Appeal Filed on

5 / 26 / 2 2 Wit h out Prejudice .” We grant the m otion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant s must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : July 21, 2022
EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                  ------------

                                             Jurisdiction of    Percentage Owned
Subsidiaries                                  Incorporation       By Registrant
------------                                  -------------       -------------

DCA Medical Services, Inc.                    Florida                  100%
DCA of SO. GA., LLC                           Delaware                  70%
DCA of Vineland, LLC                          New Jersey                80%
Dialysis Services of NJ, Inc.-
                  Manahawkin                  New Jersey                80%
Dialysis Services of NJ, Inc. -
                  Toms River*                 New Jersey                80%
Dialysis Services of PA, Inc. - Carlisle      Pennsylvania              80%
Dialysis Services of PA, Inc. - Chambersburg  Pennsylvania              80%
Dialysis Services of PA, Inc. - Lemoyne       Pennsylvania             100%
Dialysis Services of PA, Inc. - Wellsboro     Pennsylvania             100%
Renal Services of Pa., Inc.*                  Pennsylvania             100%


* inactive.
Supplementary Information  FAS 69

(unaudited)

The supplemental data on the Companys oil and gas activities was prepared in accordance with the FASBs SFAS No. 69: Disclosures About Oil and Gas Producing Activities. Activities not directly associated with conventional crude oil and natural gas production, including synthetic oil operations, are excluded from all aspects of this supplementary oil and gas information.





72        
T A L I S M A N  E N E R G Y  I N C.                                                          
S u p p l e m e n t a r y  I n f o r m a t i o n

---





Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows from Proved Reserves

Future net cash flows were calculated by applying the respective year end prices to the Companys estimated future production of proved reserves and deducting estimates of future development and production costs and income taxes. Future development and production costs have been estimated based on existing economic and operating conditions. Future income taxes have been estimated based on statutory tax rates enacted at year end. The present values of the estimated future cash flows were determined by applying a 10% discount rate prescribed by the FASB.

In order to increase the comparability between companies, the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows necessarily employs uniform assumptions that do not necessarily reflect managements best estimate of future events and anticipated outcomes. Accordingly, the Company does not believe that the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows will be representative of actual future net cash flows and should not be considered to represent the fair market value of the oil and gas properties. Actual future net cash flows will differ significantly from those estimated due to, but not limited to, the following:

- production rates will differ from those estimated both in terms of timing and amount. For example, future production may include significant additional volumes from unproved reserves;
- future prices and economic conditions will differ from those at year end. For example, changes in prices decreased the discounted future net cash flows by $3.2 billion in 2003;
- future production and development costs will be determined by future events and will differ from those at year end; and
- estimated income taxes will differ in terms of amounts and timing dependent on the above factors, changes in enacted rates and the impact of future expenditures on unproved properties.





S u p p l e m e n t a r y  I n f o r m a t i o n                                                         
2 0 0 3 
A N N U A L  R E P O R T              
73

---







74        
T A L I S M A N  E N E R G Y  I N C.                                                          
S u p p l e m e n t a r y  I n f o r m a t i o n

---







S u p p l e m e n t a r y  I n f o r m a t i o n                                                            
2 0 0 3 
A N N U A L  R E P O R T          
75

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-20687

Summary Calendar

_____________________

SPHERE DRAKE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

D. S. STERLING PROPERTIES, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants,

D. S. STERLING PROPERTIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(95-CV-4810)

_________________________________________________________________

April 29, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sphere Drake Insurance Company filed a declaratory judgment

action against its insured, D. S. Sterling Properties, Inc.,

claiming that it was not obligated to defend or indemnify Sterling

in a state court wrongful death action by the mother of a tenant

killed by another tenant in an apartment complex owned by Sterling.
- 2 -

The district court granted summary judgment for Sphere Drake; that

judgment became final when the coverage issues were severed from

the remaining issues.

Sterling contends that (1) Sphere Drake is not entitled to

enforce the insurance contract’s coverage exclusions because its

violations of the surplus-lines requirements of the Texas Insurance

Code disqualified it from being an eligible surplus-lines insurer;

(2) even if Sphere Drake is an eligible surplus-lines insurer, the

coverage exclusions for assault and battery and punitive damages

are unenforceable; and (3) the district court erred by granting

summary judgment on issues Sphere Drake did not address until its

reply to Sterling’s cross-motion for summary judgment.

Pursuant to our de novo review, we AFFIRM for essentially the

reasons stated by the district court. Sphere Drake Ins. Co. v. D.

S. Sterling Properties, Inc., et al., No. H-95-4810 (S.D. Tex. May

7, 1996). Sterling’s contentions regarding procedural

irregularities in the summary judgment proceedings are without

merit. 

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18128]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): August 28, 
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 22, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 343 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017-178, CP2017-279.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-18128 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
#### Edwin G. DIEHL *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 98-304

962 S.W.2d 369

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered April 9, 1998

*Gene O’Daniel,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Edwin G. Diehl has filed a motion for belated appeal. Appellant was convicted on August 11, 1997, of driving while intoxicated, but he was not formally sentenced until September 10, 1997. The record reflects that the notice of appeal was filed on September 12, 1997; however, the judgment and commitment order was not entered until September 16, 1997. Thus, the notice of appeal was untimely and ineffective. *See*Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 4.

*513Appellant’s attorney Gene O’Daniel has assumed responsibility for failing to verify that the judgment and commitment order had been filed prior to the filing of the notice of appeal. The motion reflects that Mr. O’Daniel was mistakenly informed by Appellant’s trial counsel that the notice of appeal had to be filed by September 12, 1997. Because he has admitted responsibility for the error, we grant the motion for belated appeal. We direct that a copy of this order be filed with the Committee on Professional Conduct. *See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964 (1979) *(per curiam).*
Portions
of the exhibit marked by [***] have been redacted  EXHIBIT 10.28 ADDENDUM 
TO  LICENSE AGREEMENT  BETWEEN  ADVANCED TISSUE SCIENCES, INC.  a Delaware corporation, as ATS  AND  INAMED CORPORATION,  a Delaware corporation, as IMDC  THIS ADDENDUM
(the Addendum) is made and entered into as of September 14, 1999 (the
Effective Date), by and between Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (ATS), and INAMED Corporation, a Delaware corporation (IMDC).  RECITALS  A.            ATS and IMDC entered into a License
Agreement dated May 10,1999 (the License Agreement).  B.            Capitalized terms not otherwise
defined in this Addendum shall have the meaning set forth in the License
Agreement.  C.            Section 1.2 of the License Agreement
granted IMDC an option to acquire from ATS a license with respect to the Second
Phase Product Categories upon (i) the acquisition by IMDC of at least [***] of
CGEN by September 30, 1999; and (ii) the payment of [***] cash to ATS, as set
forth in Section 2.1 of the License Agreement.  D.            IMDC has acquired at
least [***] of CGEN, IMDC has made the [***] payments to ATS, and IMDC has
exercised said option to obtain a license with respect to the Second Phase
Product Categories.  E.             Section 1.2 of the
License Agreement required ATS and IMDC to enter into an addendum to the
License Agreement implementing the exercise of said option.  NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:  Section 1.1 is modified as of
the Effective Date to read as follows:  1.1         (a)           License
to Use ATS Intellectual Property Rights for First Phase Product Categories and Second Phase Product Categories.  ATS hereby grants to IMDC a non-  
   transferable, exclusive,
worldwide license under the ATS Intellectual Property Rights to make, use, sell
and import the First Phase Subject Products and the Second Phase Subject Products,
subject to the terms of this License Agreement.  IMDCs right to manufacture First Phase Subject Products and Second Phase Subject Products
is expressly subject to ATS (or ATS Affiliates) first right to manufacture
the First Phase Subject Products and Second Phase Subject Productsas set forth in
Section 4.2 (ATS Right to Manufacture) The license set forth in this Section
1.2 does not include any sublicense rights except with respect to the Urinary Incontinence Products, which
sublicense rights are set forth in Section 1.1(b) hereof.  IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties have executed  this
Addendum by their duly authorized representatives to be effective as of the
date set forth above.  INMAED
  CORPORATION,
  ADVANCED
  TISSUE SCIENCES, INC.,a Delaware
  corporation
  a Delaware
  corporationBy:
  /s/ Ilan K.
  Reich
  
  By:
  /s/
  [ILLEGIBLE]Title:
  President
  & Co. CEO
  
  By:
  /s/
  [ILLEGIBLE]  2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aspect Medical
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 28, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, J. Neal Armstrong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                             /s/ J. Neal Armstrong
                                             ----------------------------------
Date: November 12, 2002                      J. Neal Armstrong
                                             Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JIA EUGENE , Appellant,

v.

GINGER HUBBARD , Appellee.

No. 4D 22

- 2 970

[ May 11, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Martin J. Bidwill , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE

- 18

- 026043

.
Rick S. Jacobs of Miller & Jacobs, Pompano Beach, for appellant

.

Warren B. Kwavnick of Cooney

, Trybus

, Kwavnick Peets

, PLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.