alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998 
<CASH>                                           6,945
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          27,916
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     64,422
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        276,070
<ALLOWANCE>                                        781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 392,962
<DEPOSITS>                                     307,280
<SHORT-TERM>                                    33,850
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,171
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 392,962
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,686
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,349
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,035
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,431
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,995
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,040
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        6
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 178
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,833
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,185
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,185
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.81
<LOANS-NON>                                        639
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   775
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  781
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               781
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-40201

Conference Calendar

__________________

BRUCE WAYNE MULLINS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ALVIN G. KHOURY, Judge, 124th District Court,

Gregg County, Texas; RUBY COOPER, District

Clerk, Gregg County, Texas,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-865

- - - - - - - - - -

April 19, 1996

Before, DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Bruce Wayne Mullins appeals the dismissal of his civil

rights action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). 

Mullins’s complaint requests an order requiring production of the

state trial transcript only. Federal courts have no power to

direct state judicial officials in the performance of their

functions. Moye v. Clerk, DeKalb County Superior Court, 474 F.2d

1275, 1276 (5th Cir. 1973). Because the complaint had no

arguable basis in law, the district court did not abuse its

discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous. Graves v. 
No. 96-40201

-2-

Hampton, 1 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1993). Because this appeal is

frivolous, it is DISMISSED. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2

 We caution Mullins that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Mullins is further cautioned to

review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously

decided by this court. 

 APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING GIVEN.
Exhibit 99.03

                                                             Company's Form 10-Q
                                                             June 30, 1996

                                                             Page 13


     In August 1996, a purported class action, entitled Rosa Anderson v.
Commercial Credit Corporation, was filed in the Circuit Court for Sumber County,
Alabama containing allegations substantially similar to allegations contained in
certain individual actions currently pending, including, among other things,
that plaintiffs were mislead or induced to refinance existing loans which
carried excessive and/or unnecessary fees and charges that were not fully
disclosed to them. The plaintiffs seek, among other things, compensatory damages
in an unspecified amount. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to
this action and intends to contest the allegations.
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




NaviSite, Inc.




Amendment No. 1 to Restricted Stock Agreement

Granted Under Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan




          AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT made as of this [___] day of [                    ], 2009
between NaviSite, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and [                    ] (the
“Participant”).




          Whereas, the Participant and the Company are parties to a Restricted Stock Agreement dated
[                     ___, 200_] (the “Restricted Stock Agreement”); and




          Whereas, the Participant and the Company desire to amend the Restricted Stock Agreement as set
forth herein;




          Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:




          1.
The Restricted Stock Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end
of clause (a) of Section 2: “If a vesting date shall fall on a date which is during a
Company-declared black-out period with respect to the Common Stock to which the Participant is
subject, such vesting date shall be delayed until the first business day after the expiration of
such black-out period; provided, however, that if the Participant ceases to be employed by the
Company during such black-out period, the Shares that would have vested but for the black-out
period shall not be forfeited and shall vest on the date the Participant ceases to be employed by
the Company.”




          2. In all other respects, the Restricted Stock Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed.




 









 





          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 to Restricted Stock
Agreement as of the day and year first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	NaviSite, Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 
	 
	 

	 	Title:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	[Name of Participant]	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Address:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 







- 2 -
Exhibit
10.36

    


    AMENDMENT
NUMBER ONE TO

    SALARY
CONTINUATION AGREEMENT

    


    This
Amendment Number One is made as of December 30, 2008, to the Salary Continuation
Agreement dated as of June 4, 2008 (the “Agreement”), by and between Southern
Community Bank and Trust and James Hastings (“Executive”).

    


    1.  The
Agreement is amended by adding the following Paragraph:

    


    “7.16.   Compliance
with ESSA. To the extent that any payment under this Agreement would
constitute a prohibited parachute payment under Section 111(b)(2)(C) of the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”), the Bank agrees to pay
Executive an additional payment equal to the prohibited payment on July 1, 2012,
or if later, the earliest date when Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA no longer
prohibits such payment.  Such payment shall be made in a single lump
sum in cash, without interest.  The Executive may be entitled to
severance payments from multiple agreements and plans with the
Bank.  The Bank, it its sole discretion, shall determine which
payments shall be delayed in order to comply with
ESSA.   Notwithstanding anything in this paragraph to the
contrary, the additional amounts due under the Agreement shall not be paid if
the Treasury Department or other governmental agency issues guidance subsequent
to the date of this Agreement that would prohibit such payment.  A
prohibited parachute payment shall be interpreted in a manner that is consistent
with Notice 2008-TAAP, Notice 2008-94 and all other current or future guidance
issued  pursuant to Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA or Section 280G(e) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.”

    


    2.  No
other terms and conditions of the Agreement are affected by this
Amendment.

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written
above.

    


    
      
        	
                SOUTHERN
      COMMUNITY BANK AND TRUST

              
	 
      
	
                By:

              	
                /s/ Jeff T.
      Clark

              
	 
      	
                Jeff
      T. Clark, President

              
	 
      


      

    

    
      
        	
                EXECUTIVE

              
	 
      
	
                /s/ James Hastings

              	
                (SEAL)

              
	
                James
      Hastings
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

InamedCorporation:

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-107528, 333-105021,333-43072, 333-32226, 333-88541, 333-38698 and 333-33498) on Forms S-3 and S-8of Inamed Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 22, 2006,with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Inamed Corporation as of December 31,2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and the related financialstatement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Inamed Corporation.

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP |   |
|--------------|--------|

 

 

Los Angeles, California

March 22,2006

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2100-180—California]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 Code of Federal Regulations Part 380, the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed an application filed by the California Department of Water Resources on May 17, 2017, and supplemented June 16 and June 20, 2017, to permanently reroute three existing primary transmission lines at the Feather River Project No. 2100 between the Hyatt Pumping-Generating Plant and the Table Mountain Substation. The proposal would allow California Department of Water Resources to continuously deliver electricity along a different route away from repair activities at the project's damaged main spillway and emergency spillway area. The Feather River Project is located on the Feather River in Butte County, California.

Staff prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the application which analyzes the potential environmental effects of approving the requested transmission line modification. In the EA, staff concludes that such an approval, with specified environmental protection measures, would not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.

                    A copy of the EA is available for review at the Commission's Public Reference Room or it may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *www.ferc.gov*                     using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number P-2100-180 in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, 202-502-8659.                

                    For further information, contact Mr. John Aedo at (415) 369-3335 or by email at                     *john.aedo@ferc.gov.*

Dated: August 23, 2017.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-18239 Filed 8-28-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50251 Summary Calendar

GREGORY BERNARD SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DENISE DESHIELDS, Medical Doctor - Rogelio Sanchez State Jail; CHAPLIN WALLS, Physicians Assistant - Rogelio Sanchez State Jail; GILBERT CAMPUZANO, Warden - Rogelio Sanchez State Jail; ROCHELLE MCKINNEY, A.D. Medical, Regional Director Medical; ALL NURSES OF MEDICAL STAFF OF THE ROGELIO SANCHEZ STATE JAIL, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-99-CV-187-H

-------------------- May 2, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gregory Bernard Smith, Texas prisoner #798960, appeals the district court’s grant of the defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to F ED . R. C IV . P. 50(a). Smith argues that the district court erred by granting the motion during jury deliberations. Smith also argues that the district court erredNo. 01-50251 -2- in determining that he failed to establish the defendants’ deliberate indifference toward his hepatitis condition. Smith’s motion for appointment of appellate counsel is DENIED. See Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212-13 (5th Cir. 1982). We review the grant of a judgment as a matter of law de

novo . Hidden Oaks Ltd. v. City of Austin , 138 F.3d 1036, 1042 (5th Cir. 1998). Judgment under Rule 50 is proper when “a party has been fully heard on an issue and there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for that party on that issue.” Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods.
Inc. , 530 U.S. 133, 149 (2000)(quoting F ED . R. C IV . P. 50(a)). The record demonstrates that before the case went to the jury, the district court excused the jury in order to entertain the parties’ arguments on the motion. A further review of the record and the allegations made by Smith fail to establish the requisite elements of deliberate indifference. See Domino v. Texas Dep’t of Criminal Justice , 239 F.3d 752, 756 (5th Cir. 2001)(citation and quotation omitted). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 21
                               ----------

             SUBSIDIARIES AND JOINT VENTURE OF THE COMPANY


As of March 31, 1999, the Company owned a majority to one hundred percent
of the following securities of the following subsidiaries and Joint
Venture:


                               State (Country)       Percentage of Voting
Subsidiary                     of Incorporation        Securities Owned
----------                     ----------------      --------------------

San Luis Estates, Inc.         Colorado                    100.00%
Universal Developers, Inc.     Wisconsin                   100.00%
Homespan Realty Co., Inc.      Wisconsin                   100.00%
Piccadilly Advertising Agency, Wisconsin                   100.00%
 Inc. now known as Ecomm
 Group Inc.
San Sebastian Gold Mines,      Nevada                       82.50%
 Inc.
Mineral San Sebastian, S.A.    (El Salvador, Central        52.00%
 de C.V.                       America)
Commerce/Sanseb Joint Venture  Wisconsin (and El Salvador,  90.00%
                               Central America)
Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Unilever N.V., a corporation organized under the laws of
the Netherlands (the Company) for the period ending December31, 2016as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the
Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|Dated: 28 February 2017                  
|                                         
|/s/ Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman
|Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman    
|Chief Executive Officer                  
|                                         
|Dated: 28 February 2017                  
|                                         
|/s/ Graeme David Pitkethly               
|Graeme David Pitkethly                   
|Chief Financial Officer
amendempagmt030209.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    

    


    March 2,
2009

    


    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              Re:

            	
              Amendment
      to Employment Agreement

            


    

    


    Mr.
Terrell Herring

    3531
North Sugan Road

    New Hope,
PA 18938

    


    Dear
Terry:

    


    This
letter confirms our agreement and shall serve to amend the April 8, 2002
Employment Agreement between you and the Company in accordance with the
following.

    Compensation:  Effective
January 1, 2009, the Company shall pay the Executive a base salary at an annual
rate of $500,000 payable at such times
and in accordance with the Company's customary payroll practices as they may be
adopted or modified from time to time.

    


    Bonus
   The Executive shall be eligible for a bonus in each
calendar year and will participate in the Corporate 0-150% bonus plan with the
amount of such bonus, if any, remaining subject to the discretion of the
Company.

    


    Continuing Effectiveness
of Employment Agreement  Except as modified herein, the
Employment Agreement dated April 8, 2008 shall remain in full force and effect
in accordance with their respective terms.

     

    If the
foregoing is satisfactory, please so indicate by signing and returning to me the
enclosed copy of this Letter Agreement where upon this will constitute the
agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter referenced
herein.

     

    


    Very
truly yours,

    


    /s/ Blane Walter


    


    Blane
Walter

    


    


    


    Accepted
and agreed to
by:______________________                                                                                                                     Dated:________________

    Terrell Herring
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           19961
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2896
<ALLOWANCES>                                        12
<INVENTORY>                                       2034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 32474
<PP&E>                                          173249
<DEPRECIATION>                                   78807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  135278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            17672
<BONDS>                                           2884
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         40556
<OTHER-SE>                                        5944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    135278
<SALES>                                         114743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                118570
<CGS>                                            95240
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    95240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1951
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (511)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (191)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (320)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (320)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23 
   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-158205), and in the related Prospectus of El Paso Corporation, Colorado Interstate Gas Company, Colorado Interstate Issuing Corporation, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Southern Natural Gas Company, Southern Natural Issuing Corporation and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company of our report dated February 28, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Colorado Interstate Gas Company, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.
  
   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
       Houston, Texas
 February 28, 2011