alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 709 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 709

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the amendments 
made by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act which disqualify 
 expenses for over-the-counter drugs under health savings accounts and 
                 health flexible spending arrangements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2015

Mr. Roberts (for himself, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Burr, Mr. Rubio, 
    Ms. Collins, Mr. Heller, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Flake, and Mr. King) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the amendments 
made by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act which disqualify 
 expenses for over-the-counter drugs under health savings accounts and 
                 health flexible spending arrangements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Access to Medication Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISQUALIFICATION OF EXPENSES FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER 
              DRUGS UNDER CERTAIN ACCOUNTS AND ARRANGEMENTS.

    (a) HSAs.--Section 223(d)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking the last sentence.
    (b) Archer MSAs.--Section 220(d)(2)(A) of such Code is amended by 
striking the last sentence.
    (c) Health Flexible Spending Arrangements and Health Reimbursement 
Arrangements.--Section 106 of such Code is amended by striking 
subsection (f).
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to expenses incurred after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 23 - 00248 - CV CARY ALLEN SIMMANG , A PPELLANT V. STANDARD LIFE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY , APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 47th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No . 110014 -

A - CV , Honorable Dee Johnson , Presiding 

### October 25 , 2023 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant, Cary Allen Simmang, proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial court’s Final Take Nothing Judgment . The clerk’s record has been filed. The reporter’s record was due September 11, 2023, but was not filed . That day, the reporter notified the Cou rt that Simmang failed to request preparation and make payment arrangements for the2

record. 1 On October 17, 2023, Simmang filed a letter with the Clerk of the Court representing that he had both requested and “paid court reporter’s fees long ago.” Under Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(b), i t is the appellant’s responsibility to request prepa ration and make payment arrangements for the reporter’s record. When an appellant fails to do so, we may consider and decide an appeal without a reporter’s record, unless appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3( c). Because we are unable to determine whether Simmang has complied with Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(b) , we abate th e appeal and remand t his cause to the trial court to hold a hearing, by whatever means necessary, and determine (1) whether Simmang re quested preparation of the reporter’s record; (2) if so, what portions of the reporter’s record were requested; (3) whether Simmang paid for the preparation of th e requested portions of the reporter’s record; and (4) if Simmang has not paid for the reporte r’s record, whether he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 35.3(c) (providing that t he trial and appellate court s are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed ); T EX . R. C IV . P. 145 (concerning indigence and payment of costs). The trial court shall enter its findings in a written order a nd include the order in a supplemental clerk ’ s record which it must cause to be filed with this Court by November 27 , 202 3
. Per Curiam

1 W e subsequently notified Simmang of his responsibility to request and pay for the reporter’s record
. Simmang did not file a response
. Thus, b y letter of October 1 2 , 2023, we set Simmang’s brief due without the benefit of a reporter’s record pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.3(c). We now vacate Simmang’s current briefing deadline.
No. 1156.

#### Beshears *v.*Nierstheimer, Warden.

May 27, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Randolph County, Illinois, denied.
**Exhibit 31. 2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Timothy W. Baker, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cynosure, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;b) [Not Applicable];c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: May 11, 2006 /s/ Timothy W. Baker Timothy W. Baker    Executive Vice President, Chief Financial    Officer and Treasurer
|    |                                                                                      |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of World Acceptance Corporation; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|             |
|-------------|
|             |  |  |
| Date:  | June 14, 2013 | /s/  Kelly M. Malson |
|        |   | Kelly M. Malson |
|        |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Board of Directors and Member of Wisconsin Gas LLC: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-107694 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 4, 2005 relatingto the financial statements of Wisconsin Gas LLC (formerly Wisconsin Gas Company), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wisconsin Gas LLC for the year ended December 31, 2004. Our report on the financial statements expresses anunqualified opinion on those financial statements and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption on January 1, 2002 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHELLP                

Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 

March 9, 2005
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Christopher MOORE, Appellant. *26Daniel Gladden, also known as Raz, also known as Raz Gladden, also known as Noodles Gladden, also known as Noodles, Defendant.*

No. 11-1854-cr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 19, 2012.

Christopher Moore, Jonesville, VA, pro se.

Amy Busa, Matthew S. Amatruda, Assistant United States Attorneys, of Counsel, for Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: PIERRE N. LEVAL, JOS É A. CABRANES, and ROBERT D. SACK, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the official caption in this case to conform to the listing of the parties above.

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant Christopher Moore, proceeding *pro se,*appeals from the District Court’s April 18, 2011 post-judgment order (1) construing certain papers that he filed as a motion for reconsideration of its February 26, 2009 ruling on his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); and (2) denying the motion as construed. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

First, the District Court correctly determined that the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub.L. No. 111-220, 124 Stat. 2372, cannot be used to reduce the sentences of defendants, like Moore, who were sentenced prior to the Act’s August 2010 effective date, *see United States v. Diaz,*627 F.3d 930, 931 (2d Cir.2010) (per curiam). Second, Moore’s arguments that (1) his sentence is unconstitutional under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and (2) the evidence at trial established that the substance involved in his offense was powder cocaine, rather than crack cocaine, are beyond the proper scope of the current appeal. The Supreme Court has made it abundantly clear that “ § 3582(c)(2) does not authorize a sentencing or resentencing proceeding” and only grants courts the power to reduce a sentence in specific circumstances not before us. *Dillon v. United States,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 2690, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010). For these reasons, we find no merit to Moore’s appeal.

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we AFFIRM the April 18, 2011 order of the District Court.
Mechanical engineers

Perform engineering duties in planning and designing tools, engines, 

machines, and other mechanically functioning equipment. Oversee 

installation, operation, maintenance, and repair of equipment such as 

centralized heat, gas, water, and steam systems.

Cognitive and mental requirements

The qualifications that workers need to use judgment, make decisions, 

interact with others, and adapt to changes in jobs.

In 2023, work was controlled by people for 21.7 percent of mechanical 

engineers, and work was self-paced for 74.7 percent.

Table 1. Percentage of mechanical engineers with cognitive and mental requirements, 

2023

Requirement Yes No

Pace: Pause control 98.9 1.1

Interaction with general public 68.1 31.9

Working around crowds <0.5 >99.5

Telework 26.0 74.0

Work review: Supervising others 8.8 91.2

Work review: Presence of supervisor 75.7 24.3

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Requirements Survey

Education, training, and experience requirements

The minimum level of formal 

education required, 

credentials necessary, on-thejob training, and prior work 

experience necessary for 

average performance in jobs.

In 2023, credentials were 

required for 19.6 percent of 

mechanical engineers. Prior 

work experience was 

required for 54.7 percent and 

on-the-job training was 

required for 78.3 percent.

A bachelor's degree was 

required for 96.3 percent of 

mechanical engineers.
Occupational Requirements Survey ●www.bls.gov/ors ●orsinfo@bls.gov ●202.691.6199

Environmental conditions

The various tangible or concrete hazards 

or difficulties that are in the vicinity of 

where jobs’ critical tasks are performed.

In 2023, greater than 95 percent of 

mechanical engineers were not exposed 

to extreme cold, and 99.4 percent were 

not exposed to extreme heat. Wetness 

was not present for 98.2 percent, greater 

than 75 percent were not exposed to 

heavy vibrations, and 91.4 percent were 

not exposed to the outdoors.

Physical demands

Refer to the physical activities required to 

perform tasks in jobs. The presence and, in some 

cases, duration of these activities are published.

In 2023, keyboarding was required for greater 

than 99.5 percent of mechanical engineers and 

was not required for less than 0.5 percent. For 

less than 0.5 percent of workers, keyboarding 

was seldom performed, for 23.7 percent 

keyboarding occurred occasionally, 75.9 percent 

frequently, and for less than 0.5 percent 

keyboarding occurred constantly.

Performing work in low postures was required for 

14.6 percent of mechanical engineers and was 

not required for 85.4 percent.

The choice to sit or stand when performing critical tasks was available to 96.4 percent of mechanical engineers. On 

average, workers spent 80.5 percent of the workday sitting and 19.5 percent of the workday standing.

Table 2. Percentage of mechanical engineers with physical demands, 2023

Requirement Yes No

Choice of sitting or standing 96.4 3.6

Driving 18.9 81.1

Climbing structure-related ramps or stairs 33.8 66.2

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Requirements Survey
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Pediatrics Subcommittee, October 12, 2017, 08:30 a.m. to October 12, 2017, 05:00 p.m. Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD., 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 14, 2017, Pg. 82 FRN 239400 Vol. 155.                

The meeting has changed from October 12, 2017, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. to October 13, 2017, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: August 24, 2017.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-18338 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors
City National Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-01993, 333-87719, 333-61854, 333-88118 and
33-56632) on Form S-8, and (No. 333-104395) on Form S-4 of City National Corporation of our reports dated February 27, 2008,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of City National Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of City National Corporation.

Our
report on the consolidated financial statements refers to changes in 2007 in City National Corporation's method of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, and in 2006, City
National Corporation changed its methods of accounting for defined benefit pensions and other postretirement plans, stock-based compensation, and considering the effects of prior year misstatements
when quantifying misstatements in the current year financial statements.

KPMG LLP

Los
Angeles, California
February 27, 2008

---



QuickLinks
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KIMO S. DAVID, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-5105

)

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o )

JANICE DAVID-CROUCH, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed June 26, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Chet Tharpe, 

Judge.

Kimo S. David, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant

Attorney General, Tallahassee, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). 

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
##### 



CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY
 Years Ended December 312007
    
    2006
    
    2005
    
    2004
    
    2003(b)Earnings as defined (a)Pretax income from continuing operations
    
    $
    437
    
    
    $
    167
    
    
    $
    (590
    )
    
    $
    439
    
    
    $
    333Exclude equity basis subsidiaries (c)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (42
    )Include equity basis dividends received (c)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    45Fixed charges as defined, adjusted to
exclude capitalized interest of $6, $10,
$38, $(25), and $9 for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, and
2003, respectively. (d)
    
    
    290
    
    
    
    300
    
    
    
    281
    
    
    
    373
    
    
    
    255Earnings as defined
    
    $
    727
    
    
    $
    466
    
    
    $
    (310
    )
    
    $
    811
    
    
    $
    591Fixed charges as defined (a)Interest on long-term debt
    
    $
    236
    
    
    $
    286
    
    
    $
    305
    
    
    $
    328
    
    
    $
    241Estimated interest portion of lease rental
    
    
    23
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    7Other interest charges
    
    
    34
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    13Preferred dividends and distributions
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    3Fixed charges as defined
    
    $
    296
    
    
    $
    310
    
    
    $
    319
    
    
    $
    348
    
    
    $
    264Ratio of earnings to combined fixed
charges and preferred dividends and
distributions
    
    
    2.46
    
    
    
    1.50
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2.33
    
    
    
    2.24
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound 

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 13-BG-1502

IN RE LORENZO C. FITZGERALD,JR., RESPONDENT.

A Suspended Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

(Bar Registration No. 390603)

On Report and Recommendation of the

Board on Professional Responsibility

(BDN-127-09)

(Submitted October 14, 2014 Decided December 4, 2014)

Before THOMPSON and BECKWITH, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Senior 

Judge.

PER CURIAM: Having found by clear and convincing evidence that 

respondent, Lorenzo C. Fitzgerald, Jr., violated District of Columbia Rules of 

Professional Conduct 1.16 (d), 8.1 (a), 8.1 (b), 8.4 (c), and 8.4 (d), the Board on 

Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) recommended that respondent be 

suspended for the period of one year, and demonstrate fitness prior to 

reinstatement. The Board found that respondent failed to deliver a client’s file to 

client’s successor counsel, did not respond to Bar Counsel in a timely manner, 

falsely asserted to Bar Counsel that he properly delivered client’s file, and falsely 
2

asserted to Bar Counsel that he did not receive Bar Counsel’s requests for 

information. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel filed an exception to the Board’s 

recommendation.

Pursuant to District of Columbia Bar Rule XI, § 9 (h)(2), “[I]f no exceptions 

are filed to the Board’s report, the Court will enter an order imposing the discipline 

recommended by the Board upon the expiration of the time permitted for filing 

exceptions.” Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that Lorenzo C. Fitzgerald, Jr., be suspended from the District of 

Columbia Bar for a period of one year.

1

For purposes of reinstatement, the period 

of respondent’s suspension shall run from the date on which he filed the affidavit 

required by District of Columbia Bar Rule XI, § 14 (g). Respondent must 

demonstrate fitness to practice law prior to reinstatement. We direct respondent’s 

attention to the responsibilities of disbarred attorneys set forth in District of 

Columbia Bar Rule XI, §§ 14 and 16.

So ordered. 

 

1

This court suspended respondent from practicing law on March 25, 2014, 

after respondent failed to show cause why he should not be suspended pending 

final action on the Board’s report. In re Lorenzo C. Fitzgerald, Jr., No. 13-BG1502, Order at 1 (D.C. Mar. 25, 2014).