alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling
and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an
authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2016 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto)
(the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling
and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida
limited liability companyBy:

/s/ Job WarshawJob Warshaw President


Dated: February 22, 2017





1601 Washington Avenue  Suite 700
 Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601



---

Schedule I

CGCMT 2013-GCJ11

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,
Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2013-GCJ11

Citibank,N.A.,

Cirino Emanuele

Citibank,N.A.,

Global Transaction Services

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York NY 10013

John Hannon

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 11th Floor

New York NY 10013

Angela Vleck

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich
Street, 5th Floor

New York NY 10013

Paul Vanderslice

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 19th Floor

New York NY 10013

Richard Simpson

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 17th Floor

New York NY 10013

Ryan M. OConnor

Pentalpha Surveillance LLC

375 N. French Road, Suite 100

Amherst NY 14228

Don Simon
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.1(a)

                       RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                        UNIVERSAL HOSPITAL SERVICES, INC.


                                 Article 1. Name

         The name of the Corporation is Universal Hospital Services, Inc.

                          Article 2. Registered Office

         The registered office address of the corporation is 1250 Northland
Plaza, 3800 West 80th Street, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431.

                          Article 3. Authorized Shares

         The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the
Corporation shall have authority to issue is 25,000,000 shares consisting of
25,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share.

                          Article 4. Director Liability

         No director of the Corporation shall be liable to the Corporation or
its shareholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a
director, except for liability (i) for any breach of a director's duty of
loyalty to the Corporation or its shareholders; (ii) for acts of omissions not
in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
law; (iii) under sections 302A.559 or 80A.23 of the Minnesota Statutes; (iv) for
any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit; or
(v) for any act or omission occurring prior to the date when this Article 4
became effective.

         If the Minnesota Business Corporation Act is hereafter amended to
authorize any further elimination or limitation on the liability of a director,
then the liability of a director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or
limited to the fullest extent permitted by the Minnesota Business Corporation
Act as amended.

         Any repeal or modification of the foregoing provisions of this Article
4 by the shareholders of the Corporation shall not adversely affect any right or
protection of a director of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal
or modification.

                         Article 5. No Cumulative Voting

         There shall be no cumulative voting by the shareholders of the
Corporation.

                         Article 6. No Preemptive Rights

         The shareholders of the Corporation shall not have any preemptive
rights to subscribe for or acquire securities or rights to purchase securities
of any class, kind or series of the Corporation.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 751 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 751

To improve the establishment of any lower ground-level ozone standards, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2015

   Mr. Thune (for himself, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Boozman, Mrs. 
Capito, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Coats, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Enzi, Mrs. 
Fischer, Mr. Flake, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. McConnell, 
 Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Scott, Mr. Vitter, and Mr. 
    Wicker) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To improve the establishment of any lower ground-level ozone standards, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Air, Strong Economies Act'' or 
the ``CASE Act''.

SEC. 2. GROUND-LEVEL OZONE STANDARDS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including regulations), 
in promulgating a national primary or secondary ambient air quality 
standard for ozone, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency--
            (1) shall not make final a national primary or secondary 
        ambient air quality standard for ozone that is lower than the 
        standard established under section 50.15 of title 40, Code of 
        Federal Regulations (as in effect on January 1, 2015), until at 
        least 85 percent of the counties that were nonattainment areas 
        under that standard as of January 30, 2015, achieve full 
        compliance with that standard;
            (2) shall only consider all or part of a county to be a 
        nonattainment area under the standard on the basis of direct 
        air quality monitoring;
            (3) shall take into consideration feasibility and cost; and
            (4) shall include in the regulatory impact analysis for the 
        proposed and final rule at least 1 analysis that does not 
        include any calculation of benefits resulting from reducing 
        emissions of any pollutant other than ozone.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Gregory B. Kenny, certify that:1) I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of General Cable Corporation;2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3) Intentionally omitted;4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 

 
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: December 7, 2005     /s/ Gregory B. Kenny Gregory B. Kenny  President and Chief Executive Officer
----

|   |   |                                                         |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                         |   |
|   |   | /s/ John R. Sult                                             |   |
|   |   | John R. Sult                                                 |   |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer         |   |
|   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)Colorado Interstate Gas Company |   |
|   |   |                                                         |   |
|   |   |                                                         |   |
|   |   |                                                         |   |
|   |   |                                                         |   |
|   |   |                                                         |   |
|   |   |                                                         |   |
|   |   |                                                         |   |
|   |   | February 28, 2011                                            |   |

----
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-18-00349-CR

________________

EX PARTE HOMERO HERNANDEZ BOLANOS

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 359th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 08-05-04386-CR

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Homero Hernandez Bolanos has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.2. A request to dismiss the appeal is signed by Bolanos personally and 

joined by counsel of record. No opinion has issued in this appeal. The motion is 

granted, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

DISMISSED. 

 

 

______________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN

 Chief Justice
2

Submitted on February 5, 2019

Opinion Delivered February 6, 2019

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
### Bureau of Labor Statistics U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Arts and Design Occupations Workers in this group create products and concepts that have practical or aesthetic purposes. Overall employment in arts and design occupations is projected to grow about as fast as the average for all occupations from 2022 to 2032. About 95,800 openings are projected each year, on average, in these occupations due to employment growth and the need to replace workers who leave the occupations permanently. The median annual wage for this group was $51,660 in May 2023, which was higher than the median annual wage for all occupations of $48,060. BLS employment projections, wage, and other data for related occupations not shown in the following table are available on the Data for Occupations Not Covered in Detail page. Information highlighting physical demands, cognitive and mental requirements, and other qualifications for workers in this group are available in a BLS Occupational Requirements Survey (ORS) profile. **Occupation**
                **Job Summary**
                **Entry-Level Education**
                **2022     MEDIAN PAY****Art Directors**
            Art directors are responsible for the visual style and images in magazines, newspapers, product packaging, and movie and television productions.
            Bachelor's degree
            $106,500**Craft and Fine Artists**
            Craft and fine artists use a variety of materials and techniques to create art for sale and exhibition.
            See How to Become One
            $52,910**Fashion Designers**
            Fashion designers create clothing, accessories, and footwear.
            Bachelor's degree
            $79,290**Floral Designers**
            Floral designers arrange live, dried, and silk flowers and greenery to make decorative displays.
            High school diploma or equivalent
            $34,690**Graphic Designers**
            Graphic designers create visual concepts, using computer software or by hand, to communicate ideas that inspire, inform, and captivate consumers.
            Bachelor's degree
            $58,910**Industrial Designers**
            Industrial designers combine art, business, and engineering to develop the concepts for manufactured products.
            Bachelor's degree
            $76,250**Interior Designers**
            Interior designers make indoor spaces functional, safe, and beautiful by determining space requirements and selecting essential and decorative items.
            Bachelor's degree
            $62,510**Special Effects Artists and Animators**
            Special effects artists and animators create images that appear to move and visual effects for various forms of media and entertainment.
            Bachelor's degree
            $99,060 **Last Modified Date:**
                        Wednesday, April 17, 2024


**U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics**
Office of Occupational Statistics and Employment Projections 
PSB Suite 2135 
2 Massachusetts Avenue NE  
Washington, DC 20212-0001 Telephone:1-202-691-5700 

www.bls.gov/ooh
Contact OOH
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 733 

To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 

numerical limitations on immigrant visas and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2015 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. REID, Mrs. BOXER, and Mr. 

SCHATZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans 

from the numerical limitations on immigrant visas and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Filipino Veterans 

5 Family Reunification Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM IMMIGRANT VISA LIMIT. 

7 Section 201(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 733 IS

1 ‘‘(F) Aliens who— 

2 ‘‘(i) are eligible for a visa under paragraph 

3 (1) or (3) of section 203(a); and 

4 ‘‘(ii) have a parent (regardless of whether 

5 the parent is living or dead) who was natural6 ized pursuant to— 

7 ‘‘(I) section 405 of the Immigration 

8 Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–649; 8 

9 U.S.C. 1440 note); or 

10 ‘‘(II) title III of the Act of October 

11 14, 1940 (54 Stat. 1137, chapter 876), as 

12 added by section 1001 of the Second War 

13 Powers Act, 1942 (56 Stat. 182, chapter 

14 199).’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Amanda Friedman, Formerly Known as Amanda Van Holt, Respondent, v David S. Rome, Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 515]

*879“The award of reasonable counsel fees is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court” *(Walker v Walker,*255 AD2d 375, 376 [1998]). It “ ‘is to be based on the financial circumstances of the parties and the circumstances of the case as a whole, which may include the relative merit of the parties’ positions, but should not be predicated solely on who won and who lost’ ” *(Matter of Sullivan v Sullivan,*40 AD3d 865, 867 [2007], quoting *Matter of O’Neil v O’Neil,*193 AD2d 16, 20 [1993]).

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the mother to pay only a portion of the father’s attorney’s fees. The Family Court’s award of an attorney’s fee in the sum of $10,000 was in addition to a previous award of an attorney’s fee in the sum of $8,800, made to the father pursuant to an order of the same court dated July 24, 2006. Given the circumstances of this case, including the relative merits of the parties’ positions, and their respective financial circumstances, the award of an attorney’s fee to the father in the total sum of $18,800 was appropriate *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 237; *Miklos v Miklos,*21 AD3d 353 [2005]; *Klisivitch v Klisivitch,*291 AD2d 433 [2002]; *Feeney v Feeney,*241 AD2d 510, 511 [1997]).

Further, the court providently exercised its discretion in allocating to him 50% of the forensic expert’s fees *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; *Bluemer v Bluemer,*47 AD3d 652, 653 [2008]; *Matter of Mohammad v Mohammad,*23 AD3d 476, 477 [2005]). Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Santucci and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Form of Amendment to 2008 Change of Control Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.8a 
 AMENDMENT TO 2008 CHANGE OF CONTROL 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment dated as of the              day of
             (“Amendment”) revises that certain Change of Control Employment Agreement dated as of the
             day of             , 2008 executed by and between The PMI Group, Inc., (the “Company”) and
            (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties
previously executed the above Change of Control Employment Agreement (“Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the
Agreement as set out below; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the Agreement
is amended as follows: 
 Section 9 is hereby deleted in its entirety. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executive’s hand and the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name on its
behalf, all as of the day and year first above written. Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 
  

	
	  
	Executive

  

			
	The PMI Group, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 
	Chair, Compensation Committee
#### Palmer *v.*Scriven and another, Receivers, etc.1

*(Circuit Court, S. D. Georgia.*

April 26, 1884.)

Action against Receivers.

When based upon consent to sue, on petition to equity court, can only be entertained by that court.

Common-law Action for Personal Injury. Motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

*Denmark & Adams,*for plaintiffs.

*Chisholm & Erwin,*for defendants.

1

 Reported by W. B. Hill, Esq., of tbe Macon bar.

Pardee, J.,

*[orally.)*Permission to sue must be given by the equity court. Such permission cannot confer jurisdiction upon any other court, *ratione materim*or *ratione persona.*In this case, the permission being obtained from the court of equity, this suit was permitted only to be brought in that court. There is no permission to sue *355in this court on the law side. This court, as a court of law, is without jurisdiction, so far as the record shows, by reason of the citizenship of the parties, and consequently has no jurisdiction in the case. Motion granted.’

Locke, J., concurs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,776
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,110
<INVENTORY>                                     78,803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,443
<PP&E>                                         134,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 276,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,309
<BONDS>                                         71,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,892
<SALES>                                        184,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,095
<CGS>                                          105,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   546
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,947)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,855)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,092)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)


</TABLE>