alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Technical information:  (202)691-6569     USDL 07-1643
              https://www.bls.gov/oes/
                                          For release:  Immediate
Media contact:               691-5902     Wednesday, October 24, 2007


      NONMETROPOLITAN AREA OCCUPATIONAL EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES, 2006


   Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) data for nonmetropolitan areas
are now available, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of
Labor announced today.  Although BLS has previously released occupational
employment and wage estimates for the nation, states, and metropolitan
areas, this is the first time that OES data have been released for the
parts of the states lying outside of metropolitan areas.  The data consist
of employment, hourly and annual mean wages, and percentile wage estimates
by occupation for over 170 nonmetropolitan areas.  Most states contain
between one and six state-defined nonmetropolitan areas that, with the metro-
politan areas, exhaust the geography of the state.  New Jersey does not
contain any nonmetropolitan areas.  The data for nonmetropolitan and metro-
politan areas can be found at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oessrcma.htm.
A complete list of available areas with the counties and towns that com-
prise them is available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/msa_def.htm.  In
the future, these nonmetropolitan area estimates will be included as part
of the annual OES data release.

Additional Information

   The Occupational Employment Statistics program produces occupational
employment and wage estimates nationwide and for all states, 409 metropol-
itan areas, and over 170 nonmetropolitan areas.  The OES program also pro-
duces national occupational employment and wage estimates for several le-
vels of industry detail.  Wage data include mean hourly and annual wages
and 10th, 25th, 50th (median), 75th, and 90th percentile wages.  OES data
are produced by a cooperative effort between BLS and State Workforce Agen-
cies, and are based on a sample of 1.2 million business establishments,
collected in 6 semiannual panels over a 3-year period.  Complete May 2006
Occupational Employment Statistics data are available from the OES Web
site at https://www.bls.gov/oes/.
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### Gilbert K. Davis v. Safesite Records Management Corp. et al.

September 29, 2000

Case No. (Law) 189098

BY JUDGE F. BRUCE BACH

This matter came before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. After hearing oral argument, the Court took the motion under advisement. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.

As the parties are familiar with the facts, only a very brief recitation follows. On June 22, 1995, Gilbert K. Davis entered into a contract with Safesite Storage for the storage of a collection of baseball cards. On August 4, 1998, Safesite, which had become a part of Iron Mountain Record Management (hereinafter referred to as “Iron Mountain”), sent a letter to Mr. Davis advising him that during an inventory review, it was discovered that 23 boxes of the baseball cards were missing. Mr. Davis gave notice of a claim against Iron Mountain and filed a motion for judgment alleging breach of contract, negligence, conversion, and breach of bailee duties. The Defendant filed a motion for partial summary judgment arguing that the amount of liability for damages on Counts I: breach of contract, Count II: negligence, and Count IV: breach of bailee duties is limited to $2.50 per box, as was written in the agreement that both parties signed.

Summary judgment is an appropriate remedy if there if no genuine dispute as to any material fact of a case. *See,*Rule 3:18. The facts submitted to the Court are that Mr. Davis, an attorney by profession, signed and entered into an agreement under which liability for damages was limited. Pursuant to *477Virginia Code § 8.7-204, a warehouseman may limit the amount of damages in the event of loss of or damage to the property provided that there is a specific amount stated per article and the bailor is given the opportunity to increase the valuation of the articles if he so chooses. This storage contract contained a paragraph with similar language limiting liability. Moreover, Mr. Davis was given the option of increasing the value of each box in exchange for paying a higher monthly fee. Mr. Davis did not choose to increase the valuation and signed the Service and Storage Agreement which valued each carton at $2.50. As a matter of law, liability is limited with respect to damages.

The Court’s decision does not affect the limitation of recovery for Count III: conversion, nor does it prevent litigation of the issue of liability on Counts I, n, and IV.
Order entered November 23, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00883-CV

DAVID GARVIN, JR., Appellant

V.

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-06754

ORDER

As ordered to do so, appellant has provided written verification that he has 

returned court reporter Terri Etekochay’s “designation form” and requested 

transcription of the proceedings held “on or about” July 5, 2022 and August 10, 

2022. Accordingly, we ORDER Ms. Etekochay to file, no later than December 8, 

2022, either the reporter’s record of the proceedings appellant requested or written 

verification no record exists.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Etekochay and the parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Martha GREGORIO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-72858.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.**

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Julia L. Osborne, Esq., Law Offices of Julia L. Osborne, Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner.

NVL-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Las Vegas, NV, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, James A. Hunolt, Esq., Stacy S. Paddack, M. Jocelyn Wright, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Martha Gregorio seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals *762(“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying her application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that Gregorio failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003).

Gregorio’s contention that the agency deprived her of due process by misapplying the law to the facts of her case does not state a colorable due process claim. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Tjraditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”); *see also Sanchez-Cruz v. INS, 255*F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.2001) (holding that the “misapplication of case law” may not be reviewed).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2002, of Colorado Interstate Gas Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer) certify (i) that the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Greg G. Gruber
                                       Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                       Officer and Treasurer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)

                                       March 27, 2003
Exhibit 23.01

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Commerical Credit Company:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-18208, 33-27241 (and the related offerings of securities registered
under Registration Statement No. 33-10444), 33-28723, 33-35618, 33-39857,
33-43351, 33-51814, 33-50513, 33-56553, 33-59415, 333-00055 and 333-13311) on
Form S-3 of Commercial Credit Company of our report dated January 17, 1997,
relating to the consolidated statement of financial position of Commercial
Credit Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholder's equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1996 and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears herein.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 26, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health: Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Advisory Committee 
to the Director, National Institutes of Health.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Advisory Committee to the Director, National 
Institutes of Health.
    Date: September 14, 2017.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 1, One Center 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Gretchen Wood, Staff Assistant, National 
Institutes of Health, Office of the Director, One Center Drive, 
Building 1, Room 126, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-4272, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d5a6262696a7e4d626923636465236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90c7fffff4f7e3d0fff4befef9f8bef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.14, 
Intramural Research Training Award; 93.22, Clinical Research Loan 
Repayment Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 
93.232, Loan Repayment Program for Research Generally; 93.39, 
Academic Research Enhancement Award; 93.936, NIH Acquired 
Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan Repayment Program; 93.187, 
Undergraduate Scholarship Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged 
Backgrounds, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: August 24, 2017.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-18339 Filed 8-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
PURE BIOFUELS
      CORP.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
                 

              	
                By:
      

              	/s/ Luis
      Goyzueta	 
	 	 	Name: 
      Luis Goyzueta	 
	 	 	Title:    Chief
      Executive Officer	 
	 	 	
                 

              	 


      

    

     

     

                                                                                                                                          
4
# Two groups

# Three groups
Argued and submitted April 30,

affirmed June 11,

petition for review allowed October 15, 2008 (345 Or 381)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*JON NORMAN BERG, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Marion County Circuit Court

05C42989; A129341

186 P3d 325

Eric Johansen, Senior Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the opening brief were Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, and Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services. With him on the reply brief was Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Attorney-In-Charge, Criminal Appeals, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Benjamin R. Hartman, Assistant Attorney General.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*443PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for witness tampering, ORS 162.285(1), arguing that the evidence was insufficient to establish that an official proceeding was pending at the time defendant induced or attempted to induce the victim to withhold testimony, a material element of the crime. That argument is foreclosed by our recent decision in *State v. Bailey,*219 Or App 526, 183 P3d 232 (2008).

Affirmed.
exv10w3wbwv






EXHIBIT 10.3.b.v




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This Amendment to Employment Agreement is hereby entered into as of September 18, 2008 by and
among Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), Cedar Shopping
Centers Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”) and Brenda J. Walker
(the “Executive”).



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, the Corporation, the Partnership and the Executive entered into that certain
Employment Agreement dated as of November 1, 2003, as presently in effect (the “Employment
Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation (on the Corporation’s own behalf, and as
the sole general partner of the Partnership) approved the modification to certain provisions of the
Employment Agreement;



     NOW THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound the parties hereto agree as follows:



     1. Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:




     “2.1 The term of employment shall end October 31, 2009, unless sooner terminated as
provided in this Agreement.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the
date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ LEO S. ULLMAN, President
 	 
	 
	 
	 	CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
 	 
	 	By:  	Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.
 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ BRENDA J. WALKER
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	Brenda J. Walker
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for Texas Community Bank, National Association, The Woodlands, Texas (“the Receiver”) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Texas Community Bank on December 13, 2013. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated: August 18, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-17817 Filed 8-22-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
[919 NYS2d 762]

#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Donald Hanson, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

November 3, 2010

*19APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Burke, Miele & Golden, LLP,*Goshen *(Michael K. Burke*of counsel), for appellant. *Feerick Lynch MacCartney, PLLC,*South Nyack *(Brian D. Nugent*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

Defendant was issued appearance tickets on November 19, 2008 and January 3, 2009 directing him to appear in court for his alleged violation of section 70-6 of the Code of the Village of Tuxedo Park. The record contains a supporting deposition of a police officer from the Village of Tuxedo Park. The Justice Court dismissed the charge on the ground that the subject Village of Tuxedo Park noise ordinance was unconstitutionally vague, and the People appeal.

As defendant correctly argues, an appearance ticket is not an accusatory instrument and the filing thereof does not give a criminal court jurisdiction over the defendant named therein *(see People v Devany,*24 Misc 3d 130[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 51345[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2009]; *People v Conklin,*14 Misc 3d 144[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 50385[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2007]). A criminal action is commenced in a local criminal court by the filing of an information, a simplified information, a prosecutor’s information, a misdemeanor complaint or a felony complaint (CPL 100.05). Since there is no indication upon this record that the People ever filed any of the foregoing accusatory instruments with the Justice Court, the court never acquired jurisdiction over defendant and no criminal action has been commenced. Contrary to the People’s contention, the filing of the supporting deposition did not convert the appearance ticket into an accusatory instrument. A supporting deposition “is a written instrument accompanying or filed in connection with an information, a simplified information, a misdemeanor complaint or a felony complaint . . . containing factual allegations . . . which supplement those of the accusatory instrument and support or tend to support the charge or charges contained therein” (CPL 100.20; *see People v Hohmeyer,*70 NY2d 41, 43 [1987]). Consequently, a supporting *20deposition is a document that accompanies or is filed in connection with an accusatory instrument; it does not convert an appearance ticket into an accusatory instrument. An appearance ticket must be succeeded by a legally sufficient accusatory instrument *(see People v Passalacqua,*7 Misc 3d 131 [A], 2005 NY Slip Op 50554[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2005]). Accordingly, the order dismissing the action is affirmed, albeit on different grounds. We pass on no other issue.

Nicolai, EJ., LaCava and Iannacci, JJ., concur.
Order entered January 11, 2013

In The No. 05-09-00182-CR JOSE MANUEL MORALES, Appellant
VO THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F07-59841-WX



### ORDER Before the Court is The State of Texas’s Motion for Immediate Issuance of Mandate. We GRANT the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c). We DIRECT the clerk of the court to 

### immediately issue the mandate in this case. 

### ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

### JUSTICE
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

 

I, Andrew Traeger, Vice President and Controller of John Deere Capital Corporation, certify:

 

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from November 1, 2013 through October 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 10, 2013 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2013 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 
| Date:   January 12, 2015 | John   Deere Capital Corporation |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                          |                             |
|                          |                             |
|                          |                             |
|                          |                             |
|                          | By                               | /s/   *Andrew Traeger* |   |
|                          |                             | Andrew   Traeger |
|                          |                             | Senior   Vice President and Controller |
|                               |                                  |  |  |  |

 

----