alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 830 

To increase the maximum percentage of funds available to the Department 

of Energy for laboratory directed research and development. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2015 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. UDALL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To increase the maximum percentage of funds available to 

the Department of Energy for laboratory directed research and development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘LDRD Enhancement 

5 Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CAP ON FUNDING FOR LABORATORY 

7 DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 308 of the Energy and 

9 Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 830 IS

1 Act, 2009 (division C of Public Law 111–8; 123 Stat. 

2 626) is amended by striking ‘‘8 percent’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘10 percent’’. 

4 (b) APPLICABILITY TO NATIONAL SECURITY LAB5 ORATORIES.—Section 4811(c) of the Atomic Energy De6 fense Act (50 U.S.C. 2791(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘6 

7 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘10 percent’’. 

8 (c) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 309 of the En9 ergy and Water Development and Related Agencies Ap10 propriations Act, 2014 (division D of Public Law 113– 

11 76; 128 Stat. 175) is repealed. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2022_8_26_9_49" style="width: 618px;"><caption><span class="tableTitle">Chart 1. Average hourly wages for accountants and auditors, by state and experience level, 2019</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="1" scope="col">State</th>
<th scope="col">Entry</th>
<th scope="col">Intermediate</th>
<th scope="col">Experienced</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>New York</p>
</th>
<td>$27.68</td>
<td>$40.79</td>
<td>$62.27</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>New Jersey</p>
</th>
<td>28.88</td>
<td>40.77</td>
<td>57.35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>Connecticut</p>
</th>
<td>27.28</td>
<td>37.96</td>
<td>56.45</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>Virginia</p>
</th>
<td>28.31</td>
<td>36.08</td>
<td>54.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>California</p>
</th>
<td>27.13</td>
<td>37.23</td>
<td>50.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>North Carolina</p>
</th>
<td>30.76</td>
<td>29.79</td>
<td>49.32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>Ohio</p>
</th>
<td>21.65</td>
<td>30.27</td>
<td>48.42</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>Indiana</p>
</th>
<td>21.14</td>
<td>30.53</td>
<td>47.83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>Wisconsin</p>
</th>
<td>22.9</td>
<td>30.42</td>
<td>45.83</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>West Virginia</p>
</th>
<td>24.54</td>
<td>28.13</td>
<td>44.34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>Florida</p>
</th>
<td>24.96</td>
<td>31.05</td>
<td>44.22</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>National</p>
</th>
<td>25.21</td>
<td>34.98</td>
<td>52.83</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2022_8_26_9_49_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="4">
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Modeled Wage Estimates.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p></p>
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18304]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 10103]

Certification Pursuant to the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2017

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as the Secretary of State, 
including pursuant to section 7045(a)(4)(A) of the Department of State, 
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2017 (Div. 
J, Pub. L. 115-31), I hereby certify that the central government of 
Honduras is taking effective steps, which are in addition to those 
steps taken since the certification and report submitted during the 
prior year, to:
     Inform its citizens of the dangers of the journey to the 
southwest border of the United States;
     Combat human smuggling and trafficking;
     Improve border security, including to prevent illegal 
migration, human smuggling and trafficking, and trafficking of illicit 
drugs and other contraband; and
     Cooperate with United States Government agencies and other 
governments in the region to facilitate the return, repatriation, and 
reintegration of illegal migrants arriving at the southwest border of 
the United States who do not qualify for asylum, consistent with 
international law.
    This certification shall be published in the Federal Register and, 
along with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, shall be 
reported to Congress.

    Dated: August 22, 2017.
Rex W. Tillerson,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-18304 Filed 8-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18312]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Fresenius Kabi 
USA, LLC

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 
1301.34(a) on or before September 28, 2017. Such persons may also file 
a written request for a hearing on the application pursuant to 21 CFR 
1301.43 on or before September 28, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for 
hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: 
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All 
request for hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division 
(``Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, 
appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on June 
5, 2017, Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, 3159 Staley Road, Grand Island, New 
York 14072 applied to be registered as an importer of remifentanil 
(9739), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for 
product development and preparation of stability batches.

    Dated: August 21, 2017.
Demetra Ashley,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-18312 Filed 8-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### John Thomas NOLAND, Jr., Petitioner, v. Gary DIXON, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent.

No. C-C-88-217-M.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.

Nov. 8, 1991.

James P. Cooney, III, Kennedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman, Charlotte, N.C., for petitioner.

Joan H. Byers, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Barry S. McNeill, Atty. Gen. of N.C., Dept, of Justice, Raleigh, N.C., for' respondent.

ORDER

McMILLAN, District Judge.

On August 19, 1988, petitioner, John Thomas Noland, Jr., filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, stating eight claims for relief. The *first*of these claims was that the trial judge erred by instructing the jury that unanimity was required in determining mitigating factors at the sentencing phase.

On October 13, 1988, respondent, the State of North Carolina, filed an answer to the petition.

In that answer, the State raised the affirmative defense of non-retroactivity in response to petitioner’s *fourth*claim, but did *not*raise this defense in response to petitioner’s *first*claim.

The State then belatedly, on May 7, 1990 (a year and a half after filing the original answer), filed a motion for leave to amend its answer to raise the affirmative defense of non-retroactivity against petitioner’s first claim for relief.

Recently, the Fourth Circuit suggested that the defense of non-retroactivity is waivable. In *Maynard v. Dixon,*the Fourth Circuit stated, “We reach it [the issue of unanimity of the jury in finding mitigating circumstances] by assuming, without deciding, that the State waived its defense of non-retroactivity of the *McKoy*rule that may have been available to it under *Teague v. Lane,*489 U.S. 288 [109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334] (1989).” *Maynard v. Dixon,*943 F.2d 407, 418 (4th Cir.1991).

Since the State pleaded this defense for one claim, but not for another, it is reasonable to rule, and I do hold, that the State has waived the defense of non-retroactivity concerning *McKoy*issues.

Some decisions by the courts state (mistakenly, I believe) that if a criminal defendant does not avail himself of a chance to make a plea, then he cannot do it retroactively. It would be an ironic inequity that, in a capital case, the State should be allowed to amend its answer retroactively in the face of *Teague*and *McKoy,*but that amendment to plead decisions *favorable*to the petitioner would not be allowed. Life is not that cheap.

Petitioner explicitly relied on *Mills v. Maryland,*486 U.S. 367, 108 S.Ct. 1860, 100 L.Ed.2d 384 (1988), in his first claim for *1541relief. The State did not raise the defense of non-retroactivity in its answer to this claim. It did not attempt to raise this defense after the decision in *Teague v. Lane,*which explained when retroactivity was to be applied. It does not matter whether the State’s failure to raise the defense earlier was tactical, substantive, or inadvertent. It would be grossly unfair and, I believe, a denial of due process of law, to allow the amendment.

The State’s motion for leave to amend its answer is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 816 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 816

  To amend the Coquille Restoration Act to clarify certain provisions 
           relating to the management of the Coquille Forest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 19, 2015

Mr. Wyden (for himself and Mr. Merkley) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Coquille Restoration Act to clarify certain provisions 
           relating to the management of the Coquille Forest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO COQUILLE RESTORATION ACT.

    Section 5(d) of the Coquille Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 715c(d)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:
            ``(5) Management.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the 
                Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary for 
                Indian Affairs, shall manage the Coquille Forest in 
                accordance with the laws pertaining to the management 
                of Indian trust land.
                    ``(B) Administration.--
                            ``(i) Unprocessed logs.--Unprocessed logs 
                        harvested from the Coquille Forest shall be 
                        subject to the same Federal statutory 
                        restrictions on export to foreign nations that 
                        apply to unprocessed logs harvested from 
                        Federal land.
                            ``(ii) Sales of timber.--Notwithstanding 
                        any other provision of law, all sales of timber 
                        from land subject to this subsection shall be 
                        advertised, offered, and awarded according to 
                        competitive bidding practices, with sales being 
                        awarded to the highest responsible bidder.'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (9); and
            (3) by redesignating paragraphs (10) through (12) as 
        paragraphs (9) through (11), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RIVERWOOD HOLDING, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,848
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  163,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,195
<INVENTORY>                                    178,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,499
<PP&E>                                       1,458,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                 366,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,399,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,662
<BONDS>                                      1,728,316
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                     295,709
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,399,754
<SALES>                                        555,364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               555,364
<CGS>                                          441,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  441,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,063
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (58)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              88,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (33,417)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       904
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (36,412)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (36,412)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

# AGENCY:

Air Force Research Laboratory Information Directorate, Department of the Air Force, DOD.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent to issue an exclusive patent license.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of agency regulations, the Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant The Curators of the University of Missouri, a public corporation of Missouri having a place of business at the Office of Technology Management and Industry Relations, 1601 S. Providence Road, #124, Columbia, Missouri 65211, an exclusive license in any right, title and interest the United States Air Force has in: In U.S. Patent Application No. 14/982,030 entitled “Method for Fast Camera Pose Refinement for Wide Area Motion Imagery”, filed December 19, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

An exclusive license for this patent will be granted unless a written objection is received within fifteen (15) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Written objections should be sent to: Air Force Research Laboratory, Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, AFRL/RIJ, 26 Electronic Parkway, Rome, New York 13441-4514. Telephone: (315) 330-2087; Facsimile (315) 330-7583.

Henry Williams,

Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-18052 Filed 8-24-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gary
D. Blackford, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Gary D. Blackford                
|Gary D. Blackford                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 13, 2005
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 0960 V

UNPUBLISHED

WILIAN MACHADO

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: November 5, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Kristina E. Grigorian, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA , for P etitioner.

Jennifer Leigh Reynaud , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On July 2, 2019

, Wilian Machado filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered on

October 13, 2018 . Petit ion at 1, 5 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit

of the Office of Special Masters.

On November 5, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent “believes that [P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a

SIRVA injury, as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table ”

. Id. at 3

- 4 . Respondent further

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identif y and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public acces s.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012 ).2

agrees that Petitioner has suffered the residual effect of his condition for more than six

months

. Id. at 4.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master