alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17769]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4317-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Missouri; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Missouri (FEMA-4317-DR), dated June 2, 2017, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued July 13, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Missouri is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of June 2, 2017.

    Christian, Crawford, Dent, Iron, Wanye, and Wright Counties for 
Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).
    Greene and Ste. Genevieve Counties for Individual Assistance.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-17769 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,510
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,463
<PP&E>                                       1,452,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                 550,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,057,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,519
<BONDS>                                        361,424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     442,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,057,187
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               269,740
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 91,831
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,159
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<LEGEND>               THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                       EXTRACTED FROM COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS COMPANY FORM
                       10-K ANNUAL  REPORT FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  DECEMBER
                       31,  1997  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
                       REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000
       
                       <S>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                3,508
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       102,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                           8,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    373,099
<PP&E>                                            1,293,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                      689,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,063,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               170,597
<BONDS>                                             279,447
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             27,561
<OTHER-SE>                                          431,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,063,430
<SALES>                                             449,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    461,623
<CGS>                                               104,280
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       315,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   23,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     122,239
<INCOME-TAX>                                         42,015
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  80,224
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         80,224
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        

</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 541 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study 

to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing the John P. 

Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, as a unit of the National Park System. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2015 

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 

resource study to determine the suitability and feasibility 

of establishing the John P. Parker House in Ripley, 

Ohio, as a unit of the National Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John P. Parker House 

5 Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 541 IS

1 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

4 means the John P. Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, 

5 which was recognized as a National Historic Land6 mark in 1997. 

7 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY OF JOHN P. PARKER 

8 HOUSE. 

9 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a special 

10 resource study of the study area to determine the suit11 ability and feasibility of establishing the John P. Parker 

12 House in Ripley, Ohio, as a unit of the National Park Sys13 tem. 

14 (b) STUDY REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary shall 

15 conduct the study in accordance with section 100507 of 

16 title 54, United States Code. 

17 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

18 on which funds are made available to carry out this Act, 

19 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural 

20 Resources of the House of Representatives and the Com21 mittee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate 

22 a report that describes— 

23 (1) the results of the study; and 

24 (2) any recommendations of the Secretary. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aspect Medical
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 27, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, J. Neal Armstrong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                       /s/ J. Neal Armstrong
                                                       -------------------------
Dated: November 10, 2003                               J. Neal Armstrong
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Aspect Medical Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Aspect
Medical Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
[919 NYS2d 267]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Raffa, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

January 20, 2011

*9APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*John Raffa,*appellant pro se. *John Ciampoli, County Attorney,*Mineóla *(Jackie L. Gross*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the judgment of conviction is reversed, on the law, the accusatory instrument is dismissed, and the fine, if paid, is remitted.

Defendant was convicted of violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c (2) (a) by using a handheld amateur radio device while operating his vehicle on a public highway. A person violates this statute when he or she employs a “device used by subscribers and other users of wireless telephone service to access such service” (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c [1] [a]). Wireless telephone service is defined as a “two-way real time voice telecommunications service that is interconnected to a public switched telephone network and is provided by a commercial mobile radio service, as such term is defined by 47 C.F.R. § 20.3.” (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c [1] [b].) 47 CFR 20.3 exempts from its definition of commercial mobile radio service such “private” services as citizens band radio, which is distinct from amateur radio services *(cf. People v Bozak,*29 Misc 3d 711 [Troy City Ct 2010]), which may function as “voluntary noncommercial communication service[s]” (47 CFR 97.1 [a]). If, as the People contend, amateur radios may be connected to public switched telephone networks, they failed to prove that defendant’s device was so connected, much less to a commercial mobile radio service. Thus, the mere proof that defendant employed a handheld amateur radio device while operating his motor vehicle did not establish his guilt of violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c (2) (a) beyond a reasonable doubt.*

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is reversed, the accusatory instrument dismissed, and the fine, if paid, remitted.

Nicolai, EJ., Tanenbaum and LaCava, JJ., concur.

*

 We need not determine whether Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-d would prohibit the use of the type of communication device employed by defendant in this case, as the incident involved herein occurred prior to November 1, 2009, the effective date of this statute.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
     I, Jay Higham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
     18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                                                 /s/Jay Higham
                                                    ------------------------
                                                    Jay Higham
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    December 27, 2006
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________

Nos. 96-50084 & 96-50155 

Summary Calendar

_________________________

GLEN C. JAMES,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-95-CV-1024 

_________________________________________________________________

June 21, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Glen C. James, a Texas state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis, appeals from the district court's (1) dismissal of

his civil rights action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(d), and (2) subsequent order imposing sanctions for his filing

a document in that court containing extremely vulgar and offensive

language. 
- 2 -

James asserts that the court abused its discretion in

dismissing his action pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment, noting

that he sued the defendants in their official capacities and sought

only prospective injunctive relief. The dismissal is affirmed on

the alternative ground that, based on James' filing in district

court that he was no longer being subjected to the challenged strip

searches, the action is moot. See Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S.

486, 496 (1969) (holding "a case is moot when the issues presented

are no longer `live' or the parties lack a legally cognizable

interest in the outcome"); Bickford v. International Speedway

Corp., 654 F.2d 1028, 1031 (5th Cir. 1981) (holding this court may

affirm on any ground, including grounds not considered by the

district court). 

James contends that the district court lacked authority to

rule upon a document he filed in that court after he filed his

notice of appeal, and that it abused its discretion in imposing

sanctions against him for that filing. He maintains also that the

sanctions violate his First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

The imposition of sanctions was an appropriate exercise of the

court's inherent authority. See Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of

America v. Energy Gathering Inc., 2 F.3d 1397, 1410-11 (5th Cir.

1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S. Ct. 882 (1994).

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 554 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 554

  To provide for the compensation of Federal employees affected by a 
                        lapse in appropriations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 2015

   Mr. Cardin (for himself, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Udall, Mr. Leahy, Mrs. 
  Gillibrand, Mr. Kaine, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Warner, Mr. 
    Sanders, Mr. Carper, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Baldwin, and Ms. Hirono) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the compensation of Federal employees affected by a 
                        lapse in appropriations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employee Retroactive Pay 
Fairness Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AFFECTED BY A LAPSE IN 
              APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``covered lapse in appropriations'' means the 
        lapse in appropriations that begins on or about February 28, 
        2015; and
            (2) the term ``excepted employee'' means an excepted 
        employee or an employee performing emergency work, as such 
        terms are defined by the Office of Personnel Management.
    (b) Compensation for Employees.--Each Federal employee furloughed 
as a result of the covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for 
the period of the lapse in appropriations, and each excepted employee 
who is required to perform work during the covered lapse in 
appropriations shall be paid for such work, at the employee's standard 
rate of pay at the earliest date possible after the lapse in 
appropriations ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates.
    (c) Leave for Excepted Employees Required to Perform Work.--
Notwithstanding subchapter III of chapter 13 of title 31, United States 
Code, during the covered lapse in appropriations, each excepted 
employee who is required to perform work shall be entitled to use leave 
under chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code, or any other 
applicable law governing the use of leave by the excepted employee, for 
which compensation shall be paid at the earliest date possible after 
the lapse in appropriations ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates.
                                 <all>
```
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION
No. 04-09-00346- CV J uan J. M UR ILLO d

/b /a J. J. T r a n s p o rt a

n d Jo s e G u zm a n H e r

n a n d e z, Ap pe lla nts
v . Jame s TURK , Appellee Fr om the 365th J udicial District Court, Maver ick County , Texas

T r i a l C o u rtN o . 0 7
- 0 9
- 2 2 9 0 5
- M C V A JA Honora ble Amado J. Abascal, I I I , J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en A. Ang elini, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: September 30, 2009 J OI NT MOTI ON TO REVERSE AND REMAN D GRANTED Th e pa rt ie s have fi le d a joi nt mot ion statin g the y have fu lly re so lve d a

nd se ttl e d a ll i ssu e s in dispute. The par

ties ask that we r ever se the trial co u rt ’s j u dg ment with respec t to J ames Tur k’s
re c ov e ry a g a ins t a

pp e lla nts , a nd re mand the c a us e to t he dis tr ic t c ou rt

fo r r e nd iti on

of jud g me nt i n acc ordanc e with the settlement ag ree ment. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2. 1( a )( 2) (B ). Th e y fu rt he r r e qu e st04
- 09
- 00 34 6- CV

- 2- that we r elea se the oblig ations on t h e s u p ersedeas bond a nd issue the mandate immediately . The pa rt ie s h a ve a g re e d th a t e a c h p a rt y sh a ll b e a r i ts o wn

c os ts. We gr ant the motion. The judg ment of the trial c ourt, with respe ct to J ames Tur k’s re cover

y ag ainst appellants, is reve rsed a nd the ca use is rema

nded t o t h e district court for rendition of judgme nt in acc ordanc e with the parties’ settlement ag ree ment. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)( 2)(B ). The c osts of this appeal shall be bor ne by the par t y that incurre d them. The oblig ations on the
su pe rs e de a s b on d a

re dis char g e d, a nd

the Cle rk

of thi s c ou rt

is o rd e re d to iss ue the ma nd a te immediately

upon issuance of

this opini on and judg ment.

PER C URI AM
#### UNITED STATES v. NAUS et ux.

No. 6097.

United States District Court W. D. Missouri, W. D.

Feb. 13, 1951.

Joseph E. Babka, St. Louis, Mo., for Housing Expediter, O. H. E.

Homer A. Cope, Kansas City, Mo., for defendants.

REEVES, Chief Justice.

This is a rent overcharge case in which the plaintiff has moved, under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for summary judgment upon the complaint, the. answer, and defendants’ answer to plaintiff’s Request for Admissions.

From a study of the pleadings and the law it appears that there is at least a tec-nical violation of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended. See Sections 825.2(c) and 825.5(a) (3) of the Rent Regulations.

The complaint herein prays for treble damages for past violations and an injunction against future violations. Whether or not plaintiff’s prayer should be granted in full or only in part could be determined by the court only after a full hearing on the merits. Sec. 925(e), as amended, 1951 Supp. pamphlet, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, states that damages “shall be the amount of the' overcharge or overcharges * * if the defendant proves that the violation *' * * was neither wilfull nor the result of failure to take practicable precautions, * *■

In the case of Woods v. Mertes, D.C., 9 F.R.D. 318, loc. cit. 321, the court said:

> “Rule 56 clearly contemplates a full hearing on the question 'of damages. * * ' * If the court determines that defendant’s violation was-wilful, it need not-necessarily grant treble damages, but it may grant damages in any amount not more than three times the overcharges.' The amount of the damages for a wilful violation under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 is a matter within the court’s discretion.” '

See also Bowles v. Krodei, 7 Cir., 149 F.2d 398; Shearer v. Porter, 8 Cir., 155 F.2d 77. In the Mertes case, supra, the court had sustained the motion for summary judgment after hearing on the motion, and then ordered another hearing in order to determine the damages. This court can see no purpose in such extended proceed-' *190ings when all issues can readily be disposed of in one full hearing.

In view of the foregoing the motion for a summary judgment will be overruled.