alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 1 0

- 5 0 0 2 7 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

S P I R A F O O T W E A R
, I N C

.

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l a n t

v

.

S T E V E N L E B O W ; B R Y O N L E B O W ; U N G A R E T T I & H A R R I S
, L I M I T E D

D e f e n d a n t s

- A p p e l l e e s

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 3 : 0 8

- C V

- 5 5

B e f o r e W I E N E R
, P R A D O
, a n d O W E N
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

O u r c a r e f

u l r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d o n a p p e a l i n t h i s c i v i l m a t t e r r e f l e c t s
i n c r e a s i n g l y s e v e r e s a n c t i o n s f o r r e p e a t e d a n d c o n t i n u i n g c o n t u m a c i o u s c o n d u c t
b y P l a i n t i f

f

- A p p e l l a n t S p i r a F o o t w e a r , I n c

. , c u l m i n a t i n g i n t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s
d i s m i s s a l o f S p i r a ’ s c a s e a f t e r r e p e a t e d a n d i n c r e a s i n g l y s e v e r e l e s s e r s a n c t i o n s
h a d f a i l e d t o a c c o m p l i s h t h e i r i n t e n d e d p u r p o s e s

. O u r r e v i e w a l s o s a t i s f i e s u s

t h a t a l l r u l i n g s a n d o r d e r s a p p e a l e d f r o m , i n c l u d i n g d i s m i s s a l
, r e p r e s e n t f u l l y U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Sep tem ber 1 , 20 10
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion s hould not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-50027 Document: 00511221542 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/01/2010N o

. 1 0

- 5 0 0 2 7

j u s t i f i a b l e e x e r c i s e s o f t h e j u d i c i a l p r o c e s s b y t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t f o r t h e r e a s o n s

p a t i e n t l y e x p l a i n e d b y t h a t c o u r t i n i t s s e v e r a l o r d e r s

. A c c o r d i n g l y , f

o r e s s e n t i a l l y t h e r e a s o n s g i v e n b y t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t , i t s

r u l i n g s , o r d e r s , a n d j u d g m e n t a r e , i n a l l r e s p e c t s
A F F I R M E D

.

2 Case: 10-50027 Document: 00511221542 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/01/2010
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10249--Washington First Intl Bank Seattle, Washington

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for Washington First Intl Bank, Seattle, 
Washington (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its receivership for 
said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Washington First 
Intl Bank on June 11, 2010. The liquidation of the receivership assets 
has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in 
accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend 
payment to proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: August 23, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-18153 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Ipswich Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
J. Wolnik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

      This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"). In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32),
this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B)
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.


/s/ Michael J. Wolnik
----------------------------
Michael J. Wolnik
Chief Financial Officer

August 16, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6051
LEONARD A. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONALD MYERS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-3129-6-OAK) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 2, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leonard A. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his complaint styled pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinionaccepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. To the extent that the district court relied on absolute immunity to dismiss the action, we note that because Appellant did not seek monetary damages, absolute immunity does not apply. See Pulliam v. Allen , 466 U.S. 522, 541-42 (1984); Timmerman v. Brown , 528 F.2d 811, 812 (4th Cir. 1975). However, because the district court correctly determined that this action would more properly be brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988), we affirmthe dismissal of the action with the modification that the dismissal be without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HENRY MENDOZA ANGEL; ANA

GEAN DE LA CRUZ,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-72318

Agency Nos. A098-914-731

A098-914-733

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Henry Mendoza Angel and Ana Gean de la Cruz, natives and citizens of

Guatemala, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision

FILED

JAN 30 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
denying their applications for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand.

In denying petitioners’ asylum claims, the agency found they failed to

establish past persecution or a fear of future persecution on account of a protected

ground. When the IJ and BIA issued their decisions in this case, they did not have

the benefit of this court’s decisions in Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081

(9th Cir. 2013) (en banc), Cordoba v. Holder, 726 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2013), and

Pirir-Boc v. Holder, 750 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2014), or the BIA’s decisions in

Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227 (BIA 2014), and Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I.

& N. Dec. 208 (BIA 2014). Thus, we remand petitioners’ asylum claims to

determine the impact, if any, of these decisions. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12,

16-18 (2002) (per curiam). In light of this remand, we do not reach petitioners’

remaining challenges to the agency’s denial of asylum at this time. 

Respondent’s motion to hold this case in abeyance is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

2 12-72318
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

l0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

137873 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137873 

 COA: 278172 

Calhoun CC: 2006-002703-FC 

MICHAEL DESHAWN THOMPSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 28, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATION OF DAVID W. JOOS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Consumers Energy Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Dated:  March 1, 2010
    
    By:
    
    /s/ David W. JoosDavid W. JoosChief Executive Officer
#### The Talisman.

*(District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.*

February 16, 1885.)

Pilotage—Refusal to Acoevt—Aotk® by Pilot to Recovf.b.

To justify recovery of a claim for pilotage by a pilot whom a vessel has refused'to receive, the court must be fully satisfied that the respondent refused or neglected to take such pilot, as provided by the statute.

In Admiralty.

On April 12, 1888, in the night-time, the bark Talisman, bound for Philadelphia, while off the Whistling Buoy, Delaware bay, signaled for a pilot, and such signal was answered by the Henry Cope, which followed her up the bay, and overtook her as she was about to anchor. The pilot tendered his services, and being told by the master that he intended to wait till daylight and see if there were any tugboats about, went off and did not return. Subsequently he sued for pilotage fees.

*Curtis Tilton*and *Henry Flanders,*for libelant.

*H. G. Ward, M. P. Henry, J. Rodman Paid,*and *C. M. Hough,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

To justify recovery of the claim the court must be fully satisfied that the respondent refused, or *neglected,*to take a pilot, as provided by the statute. While it is true that the liability imposed by the statute for such refusal or neglect is not, technically, a penalty,—-as the courts have decided,-—its operation and effect, when applied, is so far in the nature of a penalty that it should not be applied except in cases of willful refusal or neglect. Did the respondent willfully—that is to say, purposely or intentionally—refuse or neglect in this instance ? If he did not absolutely refuse the services tendered, ha certainly neglected to avail himself of them; and I do not see, therefore, how he can escape liability. It seems quite plain that he intended, from the start, to avoid taking a pilot if he could find a tug. He appears to have been laboring under the misapprehension that no obligation to take a pilot rested on him after reaching the point where he anchored. What he said to the pilot is consistent with this view, and seems to be inconsistent with any other. A decree must be entered for the libelant, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Balance Sheets, Statements of Income and Statements of Cash Flows and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              0 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                              13,802,861 
<ALLOWANCES>                                  509,000 
<INVENTORY>                                 1,408,828 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           16,222,864       
<PP&E>                                    118,333,207      
<DEPRECIATION>                             68,874,751    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             81,214,731      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       9,039,321    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                       53,965 
<OTHER-SE>                                 30,153,742       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               81,214,731         
<SALES>                                     1,273,951          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           15,961,783          
<CGS>                                       1,004,905          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               7,658,601          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              642,481       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              111,575      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            772,095       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,645,636       
<INCOME-TAX>                                  757,000      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           888,636      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                  888,636 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.16 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.16 
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23 (b)

                          Independent Auditors' Consent



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-64451, 333-32132, and 333-54600 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement
Nos. 33-61087, 333-5921, 333-18041, 333-61993, and 333-40970 on Form S-3 of our
report dated March 1, 2001 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of OXIS
International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Portland, Oregon
March 28, 2002

                                       1
EXHIBIT 2

CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the annual report of Talisman Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W.
Buckee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:     JAMES W. BUCKEE

James W. Buckee President and

Chief Executive Officer

DATEDat Calgary, Alberta, as of March 14, 2005.

---

EXHIBIT 2

CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the annual report of Talisman Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. McDonald, Executive Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:     MICHAEL D. MCDONALD

Michael D. McDonald

Executive Vice-President,

Finance and Chief Financial Officer

DATEDat Calgary, Alberta, as of March 14, 2005.
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of City National Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Russell Goldsmith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Christopher J.
Carey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
knowledge, based on a review of the Report of the Company, and except as corrected or supplemented in a subsequent report:



DATE:February 27, 2009

/s/ RUSSELL GOLDSMITH RUSSELL GOLDSMITH Chief Executive OfficerDATE:February 27, 2009

/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. CAREY CHRISTOPHER J. CAREY Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to City National Corporation and will be retained by City National Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency: Federal Election Commission.

Date And Time: Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status: This meeting was open to the public.
    Federal Register Notice of Previous Announcement--82 FR 37857.
    The following item was also discussed:
Draft Advisory Opinion 2017-08: Point Bridge Capital, LLC

Person to Contact for Information: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Dayna C. Brown,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-18116 Filed 8-23-17; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PATRICIA MICHALSKI, DOC# H36258, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1871 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 14, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Ronald A. Herring, Senior Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Linsey Sims-Bohnenstiehl, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
FROM THE DESK OF VEARNEAS W. FAGGETT, CSR

OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER 

CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 7 

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 75207 

972-739-3906 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

August 10, 2015 

Ms. Clara Saavedra 

The Fifth District Court of Appeals 

George Allen, Sr. Courts Building 

600 Commerce Street, 2nd Floor 

Dallas, Texas 75202-3400 

RE: HERSHELL STEWART VS THE STATE OF TEXAS 

 COA NO. 05-15-00352-CR - TRIAL COURT NO. F12-57547-Y

Dear Ms. Saavedra: 

 I, Vearneas W. Faggett, would like to request a 30-day extension from the Fifth District 

Court of Appeals in the above-stated cause. I am the Official Court Reporter in Criminal District

Court No. 7 of Dallas County, Texas. I reported the stenographic notes of the proceedings in the 

aforementioned cause of action. 

I would have been done by August 10, 2015 were it not for unforeseen software issues 

that came up and, as a result, I have not been able to work on transcripts as diligently as I would 

like and also with the daily commitments of trying to locate evidence and different things from 

the tenure of the last reporter, as well as other transcript commitments that were due prior to this 

one, I have been unable to finish the Reporter’s Record in this case. 

As a result of everything that has been going on, I’m asking prayerfully for 30 days 

extension or until September 11, 2015 to complete this transcript. 

Your consideration in this matter is deeply appreciated. This is my first request for an 

extension on this record. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/S/VEARNEAS W. FAGGETT, CSR 3129 

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 8/10/2015 3:16:58 PM LISA MATZ Clerk