alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Occupational Requirements Survey

Visual Overview for Environmental Conditions

Environmental conditions refer to the various tangible or concrete hazards or difficulties that are in the vicinity of 

workers, and describe surroundings or conditions experienced by workers as they perform critical tasks. The use of 

personal protective equipment (PPE) is identified for occupations with exposure to hazardous contaminants; moving 

mechanical parts; heights; and loud noises. If exposure is not completely mitigated by PPE, the duration of the day 

workers are exposed to these conditions is captured.

This document offers a general overview and basic descriptions of the environmental conditions that are collected and 

published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for the Occupational Requirements Survey (ORS).

Environmental conditions covered:

Extreme cold 2

Extreme heat 2

Hazardous contaminants 2

Heavy vibrations 3

Heights 3

Humidity 3

Noise intensity level 4

Outdoors 4

Proximity to moving mechanical parts 5

Wetness 5
Occupational Requirements Survey ●www.bls.gov/ors ●orsinfo@bls.gov ●202.691.6199

Extreme cold

Exposure to non-weather related temperatures that are:

• 40 degrees or colder if the exposure is 2/3 or more of the workday

• 32 degrees or colder if the exposure is for less than 2/3 of the workday 

Extreme heat

Exposure to non-weather related temperatures that exceed: 

• 85 degrees in a humid atmosphere

• 90 degrees in a dry atmosphere

 

Hazardous contaminants

Exposure to a substance that negatively affects the respiratory system, eyes, skin or other living tissue via inhalation, 

ingestion, or contact.

 
Occupational Requirements Survey ●www.bls.gov/ors ●orsinfo@bls.gov ●202.691.6199

Heavy vibrations

Exposure to a shaking object or surface that causes a strain on the body or extremities.

Heights

Exposure to possible bodily injury from falling.

Humidity

Non-weather related exposure to conditions where the air contains a high amount of water or water vapor and the 

atmosphere is oppressive.
Occupational Requirements Survey ●www.bls.gov/ors ●orsinfo@bls.gov ●202.691.6199

Noise intensity level

The noise intensity level to which the worker is exposed in the job: 

Quiet Moderate

 

Loud Very loud

Outdoors

Job requires work outdoors with workers unprotected and exposed to the elements. This does not include the commute 

to or from work.

 
Occupational Requirements Survey ●www.bls.gov/ors ●orsinfo@bls.gov ●202.691.6199

Proximity to moving mechanical parts

Operation of or proximity to moving materials, mechanical parts, settings, or any moving objects (most commonly 

moving machinery or equipment) that could cause bodily harm.

Wetness

Any non-weather related contact with water or other liquids.
EXHIBIT 11

            COMMERCE GROUP CORP. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
            --------------------------------------------------

             SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


                                            Years Ended March 31
                                      2003          2002          2001
                                      ----          ----          ----

BASIC
-----

Net income (loss) for
primary income per common
share                         $    (35,886)  $   (43,171)  $   129,790
                              =============  ============  ===========

Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding
during the year - basic         18,907,958    16,349,170    14,174,662
                               ============  ============  ===========

Income (loss) per common
share - basic                 $     (.0019)  $    (.0026)  $     .0092
                              =============  ============  ===========

DILUTED
-------

Net income (loss) for basic
and diluted income per
common share                  $    (35,886)  $   (43,171)  $   129,790
                              =============  ============  ===========

Weighted average number of
common shares used in
calculating income per
common share                    18,907,958    16,349,170    14,174,662


Add incremental shares
representing: Shares
issuable upon exercise of
stock options                      960,000       670,000       920,000
                               ------------  ------------   -----------

Weighted average number of
shares used in calculation
of fully diluted income per
share                           19,867,958    17,109,170    15,094,662
                               ============  ============  ===========

Fully diluted income (loss)
per common share              $     (.0018)  $    (.0025)  $     .0086
                              =============  ============  ===========
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 18, 2020.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-668

Lower Tribunal No. 18-16976

________________

GVB MD, LLC, etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., etc., et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alexander Bokor, 

Judge.

Di Pietro Partners, LLP, David Di Pietro, Lisandra Estevez, and Nicole 

Martell (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant.

Hogan Lovells, US LLP, Allen P. Pegg and Daniel Balmori, for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32

                        GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Form 10-QSB of Global  Entertainment
Corporation  (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2005, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Quarterly Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company each hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
          13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Dated April 14, 2005


/s/ Richard Kozuback
------------------------------
Richard Kozbuack
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ J. Craig Johnson
------------------------------
J. Craig Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**NATIONAL TECHNICALSYSTEMS, INC.**

**LIST OFSUBSIDIARIES**

NTS, TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, ACALIFORNIA CORP.(FORMERLY NATIONAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, A CALIFORNIA CORP.)

ACTON ENVIRONMENTAL TESTINGCORPORATION, A MASSACHUSETTS CORP.

APPROVED ENGINEERING TESTINGLABORATORIES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP.

ETCR INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP.

XXCAL, INC., A CALIFORNIACORP.

NATIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE,INC., A MASSACHUSETTS CORP. (50% OWNED)

NTS EUROPE, GMBH

AETL TESTING, INC. DBA NTSCALGARY

PHASE SEVEN LABORATORIES, ACALIFORNIA CORP.

----
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL AUSTIN**  **OF TEXAS** 

kilssC8therlne Lyne Barnhill County Attorney Bee county'~~ Bewille, Texas Dear &is61

Ba~'nhillr

Your letter opinfon as to **or unsouml**  , reque8ting an **o h8s**  **been Oajutlgad**  institution, **9.0** ee ballot

l d.tote. opinion to the eiieot en oolN1otoIl

or pIfuullty is nstitution'of this Btate,..antitled

seofion 1, of the Conred to br you 8bsolutely prohibits insane persons rrom Toting.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 795 

To enhance whistleblower protection for contractor and grantee employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2015 

Mrs. MCCASKILL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To enhance whistleblower protection for contractor and 

grantee employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENHANCEMENT OF WHISTLEBLOWER PROTEC4 TION FOR CONTRACTOR AND GRANTEE EM5 PLOYEES. 

6 (a) PROTECTION FOR EMPLOYEES OF GRANTEES

7 AND SUBGRANTEES.— 

8 (1) DEFENSE GRANTS.—Section 2409(a)(1) of 

9 title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘or subcontractor’’ and inserting ‘‘, personal services 

11 contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 795 IS

1 (2) CIVILIAN GRANTS.—Section 4712(a)(1) of 

2 title 41, United States Code, is amended by striking 

3 ‘‘or grantee’’ and inserting ‘‘personal services con4 tractor, grantee, or subgrantee’’. 

5 (b) PROHIBITION ON REIMBURSEMENT FOR LEGAL

6 FEES ACCRUED IN DEFENSE AGAINST REPRISAL

7 CLAIMS.— 

8 (1) DEFENSE CONTRACTS.—Section 2324(k) of 

9 title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

10 (A) by inserting ‘‘or subcontractor’’ after 

11 ‘‘contractor’’ each place it appears; 

12 (B) by inserting ‘‘or subcontract’’ after 

13 ‘‘contract’’ each place it appears; and 

14 (C) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or to 

15 any other activity described in subparagraphs 

16 (A) through (C) of section 2409(a)(1) of this 

17 title’’ after ‘‘statute or regulation’’. 

18 (2) CIVILIAN CONTRACTS.— 

19 (A) IN GENERAL.—Section 4310 of title 

20 41, United States Code, is amended— 

21 (i) by inserting ‘‘or subcontractor’’ 

22 after ‘‘contractor’’ each place it appears; 

23 (ii) by inserting ‘‘or subcontract’’ 

24 after ‘‘contract’’ each place it appears; and 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 795 IS

1 (iii) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting 

2 ‘‘or to any other activity described in sec3 tion 4712(a)(1) of this title’’ after ‘‘statute 

4 or regulation’’. 

5 (B) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

6 4304(a)(15) of title 41, United States Code, is 

7 amended by inserting ‘‘or subcontractor’’ after 

8 ‘‘contractor’’. 

9 (c) INCLUSION OF CONTRACT CLAUSE IN CONTRACTS

10 AWARDED BEFORE EFFECTIVE DATE.—At the time of 

11 any major modification to a contract that was awarded 

12 before the date of the enactment of this Act, the head of 

13 the contracting agency shall include in the contract a con14 tract clause providing for the applicability of the amend15 ments made by this section and section 827 of the Na16 tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

17 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1833). 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|    |                                                                                                                |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc.; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |

|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |
| /s/ RICHARD J. STOCKTON               |   |
| Richard J. Stockton                   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                       904
<INVENTORY>                                      1,640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,433
<PP&E>                                          54,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,482
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,472
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,831
<SALES>                                         89,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,537
<CGS>                                           62,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,887
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,742
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,121
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (482)
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7103

REGINALD C. SHEFTALL, JR., a/k/a R i egnald C. Sheftall , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. AARON JOYNER, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 8:17

- cv - 01955

- TMC )

Submitted : February 21, 2019 Decided: February 25, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Reginald C. Sheftall, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Reginald C. Sheftall, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit just ice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) ; see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim o f the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sheftall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny leave to proceed in fo rma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>  
                                                       Exhibit (23)


                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP





               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our reports included or incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K, into CMS Energy Corporation's previously filed Registration
Statements No. 33-29681, No. 33-47629, No. 33-64044, No. 33-60007, No. 33-
61595, No. 33-62573, No. 333-01261, No. 333-16793 and No. 333-17289.


                                    Arthur Andersen LLP


Detroit, Michigan,
   March 12, 1997.
<PAGE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0076. TAMEKA MARKS v. SAMUEL W. WILLIAMS et al.

This dispossessory case originated in magistrate court. Following an adverse

ruling, Tameka Marksfiled this direct appeal.

1 However, “[t]he only avenue of appeal

available from [a] magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41 (b)

(1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.” Handler v.

Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751 (406 SE2d 225) (1991). This Court may only address

magistrate court matters that already have been reviewed by the state or superior

court. See id.; Westwind Corp. v. Washington Federal Savings &Loan Assn., 195 Ga.

App. 411 (1) (393 SE2d 479) (1990).

The Georgia Constitution requires that “[a]ny court shall transfer to the

appropriate court in the state any civil case in which it determines that jurisdiction or

venue lies elsewhere.” See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. VIII; Bosma v.

Gunter, 258 Ga. 664 (373 SE2d 368) (1988). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

TRANSFERRED to the Fulton County State Court.

1 Marks directed her appeal to the Supreme Court, which transferred the matter

to this Court.

October 01, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/01/2015
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2013-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

p0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141763

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141763 COA: 285489 Eaton CC: 07-020436-FC JOEL ROBERT DIENHERT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.