40596 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Notices 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on July 

19, 2017, under section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of 

Wirtgen America, Inc. of Antioch, 

Tennessee. Supplements were filed on 

August 11, 2017. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain road milling machines and 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement of one or more of U.S. 

Patent No. 9,644,340 (‘‘the ’340 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 9,624,628 (‘‘the ’628 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 9,656,530 (‘‘the 

’530 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,530,641 

(‘‘the ’641 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 

7,828,309 (‘‘the ’309 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 

and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

August 18, 2017, Ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain road milling 

machines and components thereof by 

reason of infringement of one or more of 

claims 1–5, 7–12, and 14–17 of the ’340 

patent; claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9–22, and 27– 

29 of the ’628 patent; claims 1–7, 13–24, 

and 26 of the ’530 patent; claims 1, 2, 

4, 6–8, 11, 12, and 15–17 of the ’641 

patent; and claims 1–3, 5–24, and 26– 

36 of the ’309 patent; and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Wirtgen 

America, Inc., 6030 Dana Way, Antioch, 

TN 37013–3116. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Caterpillar Bitelli SpA, Via IV 

Novembre, 2, 40061 Minerbio BO, 

Italy 

Caterpillar Prodotti Stradali S.r.L., Via 

IV Novembre, 2, 40061 Minerbio BO, 

Italy 

Caterpillar Americas CV, 76 Route de 

Frontenex Boite Postale 6000, 1211 

Geneva, Switzerland 

Caterpillar Paving Products, Inc., 9401 

85th Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN 

55445 

Caterpillar Inc., 100 NE Adams Street, 

Peoria, IL 61629 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 21, 2017. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18024 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1036] 

Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and 

Components Thereof; Notice of 

Commission Decision Not To Review 

an Initial Determination Granting 

Complainant’s Unopposed Motion To 

Amend the Complaint and Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 16) granting 

complainant’s unopposed motion for 

leave to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation to reflect a 

corporate reorganization of complainant 

Sony Storage Media and Devices 

Corporation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2301. Copies of non-confidential 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Notices 40597 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on January 24, 2017, based on a 

complaint filed by Sony Corporation of 

Tokyo, Japan; Sony Storage Media and 

Devices Corporation of Tagajo, Japan 

(‘‘SSMD’’); Sony DADC US Inc. of Terre 

Haute, Indiana; and Sony Latin America 

Inc. of Miami, Florida (collectively, 

‘‘Sony’’), alleging a violation of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 

337’’). 82 FR 8209–10 (Jan 24, 2017). 

The complaint, as supplemented, 

alleges violations of section 337 by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,345,779; 6,896,959; 

7,016,137; and 7,115,331 (collectively, 

‘‘the patents-in-suit’’). The complaint 

further alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The 

notice of investigation names as 

respondents Fujifilm Holdings 

Corporation and Fujifilm Corporation 

both of Tokyo, Japan; Fujifilm Holdings 

America Corporation of Valhalla, New 

York; and Fujifilm Recording Media 

U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts 

(collectively, ‘‘Fujifilm’’). Id. at 8210. 

The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations is also named as a party. 

Id. 

On July 28, 2017, Sony filed a motion 

for leave to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation to reflect a 

corporate reorganization of SSMD. 

Specifically, Sony seeks to replace the 

entity SSMD with two distinct entities: 

‘‘Sony Storage Media Solutions’’ and 

‘‘Sony Storage Media Manufacturing 

Corporation.’’ Sony submits that the 

reorganization did not affect the 

ownership of the patents-in-suit. Sony 

stated that its motion is unopposed by 

Fujifilm or OUII. 

On August 4, 2017, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID, granting Sony’s motion 

pursuant to Commission rule 

210.14(b)(1). The ID finds that Sony has 

shown good cause to amend the 

complaint and notice of investigation to 

reflect the corporate reorganization of 

SSMD. The ID further finds no evidence 

that these amendments would harm the 

public interest or prejudice any party to 

this investigation. 

No petitions for review were filed and 

the Commission has determined not to 

review the subject ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 22, 2017. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2017–18044 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

United States v. DIRECTV Group 

Holdings, LLC, et al.; Public Comment 

and Response on Proposed Final 

Judgment 

Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures 

and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), 

the United States hereby publishes 

below the comment received on the 

proposed Final Judgment in United 

States v. DIRECTV Group Holdings, 

LLC, et al., Case No. 2:16–cv–08150– 

MWF–E (C.D. Cal.), together with the 

Response of the United States to Public 

Comment. 

Copies of the comment and the 

United States’ Response are available for 

inspection at the Department of Justice 

Antitrust Division, 450 Fifth Street NW., 

Suite 1010, Washington, DC 20530 

(telephone: 202–514–2481), on the 

Department of Justice’s Web site at 

https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-vdirectv-group-holdings-llc-and-att-inc, 

and at the Office of the Clerk of the 

United States District Court for the 

Central District of California (Western 

Division), 312 N. Spring Street, Los 

Angeles, CA 90012. Copies of any of 

these materials may also be obtained 

upon request and payment of a copying 

fee. 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement. 

FREDERICK S. YOUNG (DC Bar No. 

421285) 

frederick.young@usdoj.gov 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

ANTITRUST DIVISION 

450 5th Street NW. 

Washington, DC 20530 

Telephone: 202–307–2869 

Facsimile: 202–514–6381 

Counsel for Plaintiff, 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

United States District Court for the 

Central District of California Western 

Division 

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. 

DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:16–cv–08150–MWF–E 

Plaintiff United States’ Response to Public 

Comment on the Proposed Final Judgment 

Judge: Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald 

Pursuant to the requirements of the 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 

15 U.S.C. § 16(b)–(h) (‘‘APPA’’ or 

‘‘Tunney Act’’), the United States 

hereby files the single public comment 

received concerning the proposed Final 

Judgment in this case and the United 

States’ response to the comment. After 

careful consideration of the submitted 

comment, the United States continues to 

believe that the proposed Final 

Judgment provides an effective and 

appropriate remedy for the antitrust 

violations alleged in the Complaint. The 

United States will move the Court for 

entry of the proposed Final Judgment 

after the public comment and this 

Response have been published in the 

Federal Register pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 

§ 16(d). 

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 

On November 2, 2016, the United 

States filed a civil antitrust Complaint 

alleging that DIRECTV acted as the 

ringleader of a series of unlawful 

information exchanges between 

DIRECTV and three of its competitors— 

Cox Communications, Inc., Charter 

Communications, Inc. and AT&T (prior 

to its acquisition of DIRECTV)—during 

the companies’ parallel negotiations to 

carry SportsNet LA, which holds the 

exclusive rights to telecast almost all 

live Dodgers games in the Los Angeles 

area. The Complaint alleges that 

DIRECTV unlawfully exchanged 

competitively sensitive information 

with Cox, Charter and AT&T during the 

companies’ negotiations for the right to 

telecast SportsNet LA (the ‘‘Dodgers 

Channel’’). In 2015, Defendant AT&T 

acquired DIRECTV, and AT&T was 

included as a defendant in this action as 

DIRECTV’s successor in interest. 

The United States and Defendants 

subsequently reached a settlement and, 

on March 23, 2017, the United States 

filed a Stipulation and Order and 

proposed Final Judgment (ECF Nos. 31 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES