alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1










Exhibit 4.1








	COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK




	NUMBER




	PAG Customer Services, Inc. CUSIP 000185e 10 6




	SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS INCORPORATED UNDER THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS




	THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT




	FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01, OF




	APAC CUSTOMER SERVICES, tnc.




	transferable on the books of the corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized
attorney, upon surrendr of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid
unlesscounter signed by the transfer Agent and registered by the registerar. WITNESS the facsimile
seal of the corporation and the facsmile signatures of its duly authorized officers.




	Dated:







 


 









 












	APAC CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.




	Upon written request, the Corporation will furnish to the holder hereof, without charge, a
full statement of all the designations, preferences, qualifications, limitations, restrictions,
and special or relative rights of the shares of each class of authorized capital stock; and the
variations in the relative rights and preferences determined for each series; and the authority of
the Board of Directors to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of a subsequent
series.




	ASSIGNMENT




	The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations:




	TEN COM- as tenants in common
 _____ 
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- ...... Custodian
TEN ENT- as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor)
JT TEN- as joint tenants with
 _____ 
under Uniform Gifts to Minors
right of survivorship and
not as tenants in common
 _____ 
Act
(State)




	UNIF TRF MIN ACT- Custodian (until age .. ) .......
(Gust)

 _____ 
...... under Uniform Transfers




	(Minor)




	to Minors Act




	(State)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
for value received, ................ hereby self assign and trnsfer unto




	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHFR
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE




	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)




	•Shares




	of the stock represented by the writhin certificate and do hereby unrevoably constituter

and appoint




	Attorney




	to transfer the said shares an the books of the within named companation with full howex of
substitution in the premises.




	Dated




	AFFIX MEDALLION SIGNATURE




	GUARANTEE IMPRINT BELOW




	ABOVE SIGNATURE(S) TO THE ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME
AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR,
WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.




	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
INSTITUTION SUCH AS A SECURITIES BROKER/DEALER. COMMERCIAL BANK.
TRUST COMPANY, SAVINGS ASSOCIATION OR A CREDIT UNION PARTICIPATING
IN A MEDALLION PROGRAM APPROVED BY THE SECURITIES TRANSFER
ASSOCIATION INC.
Exhibit 12

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements(in thousands, except ratios)

Year Ended December 31,2008

2007

2006

2005

2004Excluding interest on depositsIncome before income taxes

$
152,361

$
353,373

$
366,886

$
376,556

$
329,751Minority interest expense


5,378


8,856


5,958


5,675


4,992Equity investee income


(3,633
)

(6,983
)

(5,647
)

(2,068
)

(1,168
)Equity investee distributions


3,914


6,629


4,844


2,234


1,337Preferred dividends of consolidated subsidiaries


(3,145
)

(3,434
)

(3,407
)

(3,478
)

(3,462
)Fixed charges:Interest expense (1)


62,958


72,416


63,700


32,712


16,607Interest within rental expense


11,913


10,300


9,644


8,439


8,535Preferred dividends of consolidated subsidiaries


3,145


3,434


3,407


3,478


3,462Total fixed charges

$
78,016

$
86,150

$
76,751

$
44,629

$
28,604Total earnings and fixed charges

$
232,891

$
444,591

$
445,385

$
423,548

$
360,054Fixed charges, as above

$
78,016

$
86,150

$
76,751

$
44,629

$
28,604Preferred stock dividends


3,225











Fixed charges including preferred stock dividends

$
81,241

$
86,150

$
76,751

$
44,629

$
28,604Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividend requirements


2.87


5.16


5.80


9.49


12.59Including interest on depositsTotal earnings and fixed charges, as above

$
232,891

$
444,591

$
445,385

$
423,548

$
360,054Add: Interest on deposits


122,990


214,680


159,024


76,045


44,258Total earnings, fixed charges and interest on deposits

$
355,881

$
659,271

$
604,409

$
499,593

$
404,312Fixed charges, including preferred stock dividends, as above

$
81,241

$
86,150

$
76,751

$
44,629

$
28,604Add: Interest on deposits


122,990


214,680


159,024


76,045


44,258Total fixed charges including preferred stock dividends and interest on deposits

$
204,231

$
300,830

$
235,775

$
120,674

$
72,862Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividend requirements


1.74


2.19


2.56


4.14


5.55


---

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084,
8th Floor 401 South Tryon St. Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2013, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and U.S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-GCJ11 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the period January 1, 2017 through December 31,
2017.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|LOGO                                     
|Daniel Bober                             
|Executive Vice President Wells Fargo
Bank



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2023_11_27_16_31" style="width: 95%;"><caption><span class="tableTitle">Chart 2. 2020 U.S. business response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in percent</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; min-width: 80px;" rowspan="1" scope="col">Business response</th>
<th style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;" scope="col">Total</th>
<th style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;" scope="col">Child daycare centers <br />(NAICS 6244)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>Government-mandated closure</p>
</th>
<td>18.7</td>
<td>35.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>Decrease in demand for products or services</p>
</th>
<td>55.6</td>
<td>63.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>Employees told not to work, with or without pay</p>
</th>
<td>51.9</td>
<td>82.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>Reduction in employee work hours</p>
</th>
<td>29.9</td>
<td>43.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2023_11_27_16_31_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="3">
<p>Note: Employees who worked reduced hours worked at least a few hours. NAICS = North American Industry Classification System.</p>
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p></p>
# INN29USFC_finalsupp2x
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 716 

To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new Form 1040SR. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2015 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. NELSON, Mr. HELLER, Mr. COONS, and Mr. 

CARPER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new 

Form 1040SR. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Seniors’ Tax Sim5 plification Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FORM 1040SR FOR SENIORS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury (or 

8 the Secretary’s delegate) shall make available a form, to 

9 be known as ‘‘Form 1040SR’’, for use by individuals to 

10 file the return of tax imposed by chapter 1 of the Internal 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 716 IS

1 Revenue Code of 1986. Such form shall be as similar as 

2 practicable to Form 1040EZ, except that— 

3 (1) the form shall be available to individuals 

4 who have attained age 65 as of the close of the tax5 able year, 

6 (2) the form may be used even if income for the 

7 taxable year includes— 

8 (A) social security benefits (as defined in 

9 section 86(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

10 1986), 

11 (B) distributions from qualified retirement 

12 plans (as defined in section 4974(c) of such 

13 Code), annuities or other such deferred pay14 ment arrangements, 

15 (C) interest and dividends, or 

16 (D) capital gains and losses taken into ac17 count in determining adjusted net capital gain 

18 (as defined in section 1(h)(3) of such Code), 

19 and 

20 (3) the form shall be available without regard 

21 to the amount of any item of taxable income or the 

22 total amount of taxable income for the taxable year. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 716 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The form required by sub2 section (a) shall be made available for taxable years begin3 ning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1335

YOHANNES GEBREIZBABHER HADGU,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A96-290-146)

Submitted: October 24, 2005 Decided: November 4, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Garfield, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID GARFIELD, Washington, D.C.,

for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General,

Michelle Gorden Latour, Office of Immigration Litigation, Maureen

T. Casey, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Yohannes Gebreizbabher Hadgu, a native and citizen of

Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s

denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture.

In his petition for review, Hadgu challenges the

immigration judge’s determination, adopted by the Board, that he

failed to establish his eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal

of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must

show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no

reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of

persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992).

We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Hadgu

fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result.

Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief he seeks.

We also uphold the denial of Hadgu’s request for

withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for

withholding of removal is higher than for asylum — even though the

facts that must be proved are the same — an applicant who is

ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of

removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft, 378

F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Hadgu fails to show that he
- 3 -

is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal.

Additionally, we find that substantial evidence supports

the finding that Hadgu fails to meet the standard for relief under

the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an

applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he

or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of

removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2005). We conclude that Hadgu

failed to make the requisite showing below.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT 31.B****CERTIFICATION**I, John R. Sult, certify that:1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ColoradoInterstate Gas Company;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:February 28, 2007       */s/ John R. Sult* John R. Sult
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case No. D A 19 - 0629 ALFRED DESCHAMPS, BAR II ENTERPRISES, L . L . C .,

Plaintiffs and Appellants , v. FARWEST ROCK, LTD, FARWEST ROCK PRODUCTS, FARWEST PRODUCTS, LLC, LUNDE BASTON, MIKE BASTON, and DOES 1 - 10

De fe ndants and Appelle e s . **ORDE R GRANTING**  **APPELLEES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE**  **ANSWER BRIEF**  On Appeal from the Mo ntana Fourth Judicial Di stric t Court C ounty of Missoula, Caus e N o. DV - 18 - 1647 Hon orable Elizabeth A. Best , Presiding P urs uant to Appellees ’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of T ime to File Answer Brief, with good cause appearing therefore and no objection by Appellants, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellees’ Unopposed Motion fo r Extension of

T ime to File Answer Brief is GRAN TED, and Appellees shall have up to and including July 30 , 2020 to file their opening brief. ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND D ATED BELOW.

Electronically signed by: James Jeremiah Shea Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 22 2020

05/22/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0629
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     The undersigned executive officer of Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc. (the “Registrant”) herebycertifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Registrant.                                                      /s/ Douglas J. Timmerman   Douglas J. Timmerman, Chairman of the Board,  President and Chief Executive Officer   February 6, 2008**Note:**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 has been provided to Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc. and will be retained by AnchorBanCorp Wisconsin Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
44
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM’S CONSENT

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement of Ruthigen, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-195737) of our report dated June 30, 2014,****withrespect to our audits of the financial statements of Ruthigen, Inc. as of March 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the years then ended,which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ruthigen, Inc. for the year ended****March 31, 2014.

 

Our report on the financial statementsrefers to management’s election to early-adopt Accounting Standards Update 2014-10, which eliminates the previous disclosurerequirements for development stage entities.  Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.

 

/s/ Marcum llp

 

Marcum llp

New York, NY

June 30, 2014

 

** **
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn:  Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Wilmington, DE  19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 200 Renaissance Center |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 10th Floor, MC 482-B10-A63 |
|                                            | Detroit, MI |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2013-1 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of April 10, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-11232 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WILLIAM D. BROSSEAU, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CR-315-1-X

- - - - - - - - - - November 17, 1998 Before EMILIO M .GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * William D. Brosseau appeals his sentence for fraudulently selling securities in interstate commerce, in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 77q(a), 77x. He contends that his counsel was ineffective at sentencing and that the district court denied him a meaningful allocution pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(C). Neither argument has merit. The record is not sufficiently developed regarding the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, which is being raised for the first time in this court. Accordingly, this court will not reach the merits of the claim.No. 97-11232 -2- See United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). As for meaningful allocution, the record shows that Brosseau was afforded several opportunities to address the court on any matter of his choice, and he did so at length. The district court did not deny Brosseau a meaningful allocution. See United States v. Myers , 150 F.3d 459, 461-62 (5th Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.