alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1:  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

               (18 U.S.C. section 1350)


In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to his respective knowledge:

1.       The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending September 28, 2002
         fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result operations of the
         Company.

Dated as of February 3, 2003


/s/ Philippe Lemaitre
---------------------------------------------------
Philippe Lemaitre
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Robert H. Fisher
---------------------------------------------------
Robert H. Fisher
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Nicor Gas
Company
 Form
10-K
  
 SECOND
AMENDMENT
 TO
 NORTHERN
ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY
 DIRECTORS’
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
  WHEREAS,
Northern Illinois Gas Company d/b/a Nicor Gas Company (the “Company”) previously
established the Northern Illinois Gas Company Directors’ Deferred Compensation
Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2008 (the “Plan”);
and
  WHEREAS,
the Company desires to amend the Plan to provide for a one time election to
receive in-service distributions.
  NOW
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new Section
11:
  “SECTION
11. One Time Withdrawal Election. Notwithstanding anything contained in this
Plan to the contrary, a Director may prior to December 31, 2008 file pursuant to
the election permitted under Section 2 for 2008, a one-time election to have all
or any portion of the balance of his deferred compensation account as of
December 31, 2008 (plus interest and dividend equivalents thereon) distributed
and paid out to him in a lump sum on May 1, 2009 (the “Payment Date”). Such
election shall include whether such distribution will be from amounts credited
with the interest equivalent option or the share unit option. If such an
election is made and the Director’s deferred compensation account is credited
with the interest equivalent under Section 3.3, then such Directors’ deferred
compensation account shall be credited with interest through the date
immediately prior to the Payment Date. If the Directors’ deferred compensation
account is denominated in share units, then such share units shall be converted
to the cash equivalent based on the closing market composite price for the
Company’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Transactions on the last trading day prior to the Payment Date. Any election
under this Section 11 shall not apply to any amounts credited to a Director’s
deferred compensation account for retainers or meeting fees for service in 2009.
An election to receive a partial distribution of a Director’s deferred
compensation account under this Section 11, shall not impact a Director’s
election as to the manner and date of payment of the remaining portion of the
Director’s deferred compensation account. A Director who receives full payment
of his deferred compensation account pursuant to an election under this Section
11 and who subsequently elects to defer compensation under this Plan, shall in
such subsequent deferral election under Section 2, specify the manner and date
on which the Director elects to receive payment of the amount to be so deferred
under Subsection 3.1.”
 
 FURTHER,
this Second Amendment to the Plan shall be effective on the date approved by the
Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.
  In all
other respects the Plan, as amended by the First and Second Amendments thereto
shall remain in full force and effect.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                            5269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1190
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1839
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 11964
<PP&E>                                          154626
<DEPRECIATION>                                   25533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  209191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            33071
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         35000
<OTHER-SE>                                         275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    209191
<SALES>                                         128094
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                134128
<CGS>                                           109882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   109882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2274
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4314)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1239)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3075)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3075)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
     FROM FORM  10-QSB AT JUNE 30,  1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         327,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,941,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                    87,272
<INVENTORY>                                 10,223,716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,581,892
<PP&E>                                      13,212,152
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,144,307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,606,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,691,656
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,088
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,078,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,606,908
<SALES>                                     15,364,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,364,316
<CGS>                                       11,220,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,220,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,014,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (82,175)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (82,175)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (82,175)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.08)


<FN>
     On February 11, 1999, the Company  effected a 1-for-15  reverse stock split
of its issued and  outstanding  common stock.  Financial Data Schedules prior to
the Quarterly  Report for the period ended March 31, 1999 have not been restated
for the reverse stock split.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------

                             WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC.

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                           --------------------------



         The Registrant (Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.) has no parents.

         The following list includes all of the  subsidiaries  of the Registrant
as of June 26, 2002 except twelve wholly-owned inactive domestic subsidiaries of
the Registrant and/or its subsidiaries.

         All of the  subsidiaries  listed below are included in the Consolidated
Financial  Statements.  The Consolidated  Financial  Statements also include the
twelve presently inactive domestic subsidiaries mentioned above.

         Each of the following  subsidiaries  is owned by the Registrant  except
that two  subsidiaries,  the  names  of which  are  indented,  are  owned by the
subsidiary  named  immediately  above each  indentation.  All  subsidiaries  are
wholly-owned   except  for  Bahamas   Supermarkets   Limited,   which  is  owned
approximately 78% by W-D (Bahamas) Limited.

                  Subsidiary                             State of Incorporation
                  ----------                             ----------------------

         Astor Products, Inc.                                   Florida
         Crackin' Good, Inc.                                    Florida
         Deep South Products, Inc.                              Florida
         Dixie Packers, Inc.                                    Florida
         Economy Wholesale Distributors, Inc.                   Florida
         Save Rite Grocery Warehouse, Inc.                      Florida
         Superior Food Company                                  Florida
         W-D (Bahamas) Limited                                  Bahama Islands
           Bahamas Supermarkets Limited                         Bahama Islands
             The City Meat Markets Limited                      Bahama Islands
         Winn-Dixie Charlotte, Inc.                             Florida
         Winn-Dixie Logistics, Inc.                             Florida
         Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.                             Florida
         Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.                            Florida
         Winn-Dixie Procurement, Inc.                           Florida
         Winn-Dixie Raleigh, Inc.                               Florida
         Winn-Dixie Supermarkets, Inc.                          Florida
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended November 30, 2003 of Arrow International, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frederick J. Hirt, the Vice
President/Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, to my knowledge and based upon a review of the
Report, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and periods presented as required by such Report.

     This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, my own due diligence and
representations made by certain other members of the Company's senior
management.


                   /s/ Frederick J. Hirt
                   -----------------------------------------------------------
                   Frederick J. Hirt
                   Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance
                   (Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)

                   January 13, 2004


                                      (33)
Employed persons 16 to 24 years of age by industry, July 2009	


Industry					Employment

Total employed					19,304,000
  Mining					    44,000
  Information					   317,000
  Wholesale trade				   321,000
  Self-employed and unpaid family workers	   350,000
  Agriculture and related industries		   381,000
  Transportation and utilities		           413,000
  Financial activities				   823,000
  Construction					   871,000
  Other services				   988,000
  Manufacturing					 1,068,000
  Professional and business services	         1,350,000
  Government					 1,588,000
  Education and health services			 2,141,000
  Retail trade					 3,851,000
  Leisure and hospitality			 4,799,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,290,000                 422,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,011,000                 861,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,828,000                 591,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,208,000               2,065,000
<PP&E>                                       3,968,000               3,968,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,575,000               7,997,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,250,000               3,470,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     17,000                  23,000
<COMMON>                                    14,298,000               6,895,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,560,000)             (2,393,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,575,000               7,997,000
<SALES>                                      4,850,000               4,802,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,059,000               4,867,000
<CGS>                                        3,200,000               3,009,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,137,000              10,758,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,319,000               4,908,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,000                  37,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,151,000)             (5,992,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,151,000)             (5,992,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,151,000)             (5,992,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)                   (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Cite as 2015 Ark. 469



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-15-948 RANDY WILLIAM GAY APPELLANT V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered December 10, 2015 MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY ON DIRECT APPEAL

MOTION GRANTED.

PER CURIAM A jury in the Garland County Circuit Court found appellant Randy William Gay guilty of capital murder for which he received a sentence of death. Gay is represented by Mark S. Fraiser, who asks to be relieved on the ground that he is not eligible to be compensated for services as appellate counsel. Arkansas Code Annotated section 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Repl. 2007) provides that persons employed as full-time public defenders who are not provided a state-funded secretary are eligible to seek compensation for appellate work. Counsel affirms that he is a full-time public defender with a full-time, state-funded secretary. Under these circumstances, he is not entitled to be paid for services in this appeal, and his request to be relieved is well-founded. Craigg v. State , 2012 Ark. 95 (per curiam). Therefore, we grant Fraiser’s motion to be relieved. We appoint attorney Dale Adams to represent Gay on appeal. Our clerk is directed to set a briefing schedule for the appeal. Motion granted.
#### Rogers and others *v.*Bowerman.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

August 22, 1884.)

Practice and Procedure—Remitting Part of Verdict—When Allowed— Right of Appeal.

A trial court, in a meritorious case, will not allow a plaintiff to remit a part of the amount for which a verdict has been rendered, when such reduction will deprive the defendant of an opportunity to have the decision reviewed in an appellate court.

At Law.

*Wheeler & Souther,*for complainants.

Wallace, J.

The plaintiffs ask leave to remit part of the amount for which the verdict in this case, by direction of the court, was rendered in their favor. The result, if such a reduction of the judgment to be entered is permitted, would be to reduce the judgment below the sum of $5,000, and thereby preclude the defendants from a review by writ of error to the supreme court. Undoubtedly, it is competent for the trial court, in the exercise of judicial discretion, to allow such a reduction to be made; but such a discretion should be very carefully and sparingly exercised. Certainly, this is not a case where the court should willingly deprive the defendants of an opportunity to review the decision. As is said in *Thompson*v. *Butler,*95 U. S. 694, 696, “if the object of the reduction is to deprive an appellate court of jurisdiction in a meritorious case, it is to be presumed the trial court will not allow it to be done.” It is far from clear that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover, and a verdict was directed for them with grave doubt as to the correctness of the conclusions reached by the court. It is a peculiarly meritorious case for the consideration of the appellate court.

The motion of the plaintiffs is denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23(a)

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-64451, 333-32132 and 333-54600 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statements
Nos. 33-61087, 333-5921, 333-18041, 333-61993 and 333-40970 on Form S-3 of our
report dated March 1, 2001 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
OXIS International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2000.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Portland, Oregon
March 21, 2001
#### Jesus ALCAZAR, Plaintiff, and Cesar Rosas, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CORPORATION OF the CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE; Horatio Yanez, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-35003.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 5, 2010.

Lindsay L. Halm, Schroeter, Goldmark, *&*Bender, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Kathryn Goater, Rebecca J. Roe, Schroeter Goldmark & Bender, Seattle, WA, John J. Polito, Esquire, Richard B. Kilpatrick, P.S., Bellevue, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Karen A. Kalzer, Patterson Buchanan Fobes Leitch & Kalzer, Inc., P.S., Michael A. Patterson, Patterson Law, Jack Michael Lovejoy, Mary Colleen Kinerk, Cable Langenback Kinerk & Bauer, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.

D.C. No. 2:06-cv-00281-RSM.

*1102ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-8. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
#### Robert FROST, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Director Bill Byars, South Carolina Department of Corrections; Levern Cohen, Warden Ridgeland Correctional Institution; Ms. Montouth, Inmate Grievance Coordinator, Ridgeland Correctional Institution; Captain Best, in their individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-7482.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.

Robert Frost, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Matthew David Cavender, Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr., Griffith, Sadler & Sharp, P.A., Beaufort, South Carolina, for Appel-lees.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Frost, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying without prejudice the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in Frost’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Frost seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*