alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the annual report of Talisman Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James W. Buckee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|By: |  | /s/JAMES W. BUCKEE                                    |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|    |  | James W. Buckee
President and
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

DATEDat Calgary, Alberta, as of March 13, 2007.

1

---



CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the annual report of Talisman Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip D. Dolan, Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|By: |  | /s/PHILIP D. DOLAN                                                  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|    |  | Philip D. Dolan
Vice-President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer |  | 

DATEDat Calgary, Alberta, as of March 13, 2007.

2

---



QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nabor RODRIGUEZ-DE LEON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-50347

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 30, 2008.

Mara A. Blatt, Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This is an appeal raising the sole question whether appellant’s illegal reentry sentence was improperly enhanced by the court’s deeming his prior Colorado drug possession conviction “a crime of violence”. According to the Bureau of Prisons website, appellant is scheduled to complete his term of imprisonment on January 21, 2008. Because his release is imminent or has occurred, this court cannot usefully grant the only relief to which appellant would have been entitled: re-sentencing.

Because no effective judicial remedy exists, we must DISMISS this appeal as MOOT.

DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Christopher F. Virgulak, certify that:1) I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of General Cable Corporation;2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3) Intentionally omitted;4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 

 
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: December 7, 2005         /s/ Christopher F. Virgulak Christopher F. Virgulak    Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RIVERWOOD HOLDING INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          19,624
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                       655
<INVENTORY>                                    174,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               352,388
<PP&E>                                       1,609,953
<DEPRECIATION>                                 237,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,566,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          313,144
<BONDS>                                      1,716,241
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                     440,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,566,818
<SALES>                                        265,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               265,435
<CGS>                                          227,962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  227,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   119
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,999
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (36,286)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       940
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (34,545)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (34,545)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Bobby D. CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-30464

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 20, 2010.

Cristina Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Cytheria Jernigan, U.S. Attorney’s *345Office, Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Angela B. Odinet, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Bobby D. Curtis appeals both his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for concealment of bankruptcy assets, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152(1). His only contention, however, is that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by: failing to produce any evidence regarding the valuation of E-rate contracts; giving incorrect advice regarding the statute of limitations for concealment of bankruptcy assets; and failing to ascertain facts regarding the amount of assets Curtis allegedly concealed.

Generally, our court declines to review ineffective-assistance claims on direct appeal; an exception is in “rare cases where the record allow[s the court] to evaluate fairly the merits of the claim”. *United States v. Kizzee,*150 F.3d 497, 502 (5th Cir.1998) (quoting *United States v. Higdon,*832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir.1987)). The record at hand is not sufficiently developed to permit direct review of Curtis’ ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims. *See id.*at 502-03 (declining to consider ineffective-assistance claim where no testimony was taken nor factual findings made regarding that claim). Therefore, we decline to consider Curtis’ ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims. This, of course, is without prejudice to his right to present them in a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. *See id.*at 503 (citing *United States v. Price,*95 F.3d 364, 369 (5th Cir.1996)).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KEITH L. JONES, II, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4112

)

CHRISTINA M. JONES, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed December 5, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; John Radabaugh, Judge.

Kevin P. Cox of Law Office of Kevin P.

Cox, Auburndale, for Appellant.

Robin H. Stevenson of Law Office of 

Robin H. Stevenson, Bartow, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit (32)(a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CMS Energy Corporation (the
"Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David W.
Joos, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas J.
Webb, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

   /s/ David W. Joos
------------------------------
Name:  David W. Joos
Title: President and
       Chief Executive Officer
Date:  February 23, 2007

      /s/ Thomas J. Webb
------------------------------
Name:  Thomas J. Webb
Title: Executive Vice President and
       Chief Financial Officer
Date:  February 23, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for Sterling Bank, Lantana, Florida (“the Receiver”) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Sterling Bank on July 23, 2010. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight  Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated: August 23, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-18154 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
NO. 06-15-00152-CR

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT TEXARKANA

 

ANGELINE BETH VILLINES

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee

 

TRIAL COURT CASE NUMBER 25003

 

SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

 

MICHAEL D. MOSHER

State Bar No. 14580100

THE MOSHER JUSTICE CENTER

50 NORTH MAIN

PARIS, TEXAS 75460

(903) 785-4721 TELEPHONE

(903) 785-5319 FAX

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

ACCEPTED

06-15-00152-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

12/29/2015 3:51:51 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 12/30/2015 8:15:00 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
Pursuant to Appellate Rule 10.5(b), the Appellant, Angela Villines, files this request for a

14-day extension of time to file Appellant’s Brief as follows. 

The Appellant’s Brief is currently due on December 30, 2015. Appellant requests a

14-day extension to file her brief, which would make the new due date January 13, 2015. This is

the second extension requested by Appellant for filing this brief. Appellant requests this

additional time to file her brief because the attorney assisting counsel in preparing the brief has

had surgery on his leg on December 9, 2015 and has missed time in the office due to the surgery

and physical therapy and counsel has been unable to adequately prepare her brief due to other

obligations, including the following:

1. Counsel’s attorney, Michael D. Mosher, was on a scheduled vacation in Istanbul

from December 3-8, 2015. 

2. Preparation and attendance at a deposition on December 11, 2015 in case styled 

In the Interest of Clint Wayne Freeman II and Wyhtt Freeman pending in Cause Number CV02143 in the 6th

 District Court, Red River County, Texas.

3. Appellant’s counsel’s office was closed for the Christmas holidays December 24,

2015 through December 27, 2015.

4. Appellant’s counsel’s office will be closed New Years Day January 1, 2015.

5. Preparation and attendance at mediation on January 7, 2016 in case styled

Richard Finley Vs. Sharron L. Cox, Et Al pending in Cause Number 81657 in the 62nd District

Court, Lamar Co., Texas.

This request is not made for purpose of delay, but to permit Appellant sufficient time to

prepare his brief.
PRAYER

The Appellant respectfully requests that the Court grant a 14-day extension of time to file

his brief, extending the date to file the brief from December 30, 2015 until January 14, 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

THE LAW OFFICE OF

MICHAEL D. MOSHER

 /s/ Michael D, Mosher 

MICHAEL D. MOSHER

STATE BAR NO. 14580100

THE MOSHER JUSTICE CENTER

50 NORTH MAIN

PARIS, TEXAS 75460

(903) 785-4721 TELEPHONE

(903) 785-5319 FAX

E-MAIL: mdm@mosherjusticectr.com

DATE: December 29, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,862,374
<SECURITIES>                                 9,496,723
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,637,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (876,566)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,075,649
<PP&E>                                       6,315,879
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,331,048)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,178,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,091,770
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,545
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,570,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,178,015
<SALES>                                      7,424,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,993,296
<CGS>                                          795,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,293,853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,072,904
<INCOME-TAX>                                   594,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,478,904
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,478,904
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

March 28, 2003

Mr. S. Kinnie Smith, Jr.
Mr. Thomas J. Webb
Mr. Michael D. VanHemert
Consumers Energy Company
212 West Michigan Avenue
Jackson, MI 49201

Consumers Energy Company is required to file an Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
within 90 days after the end of the year.

We hereby make, constitute and appoint each of you our true and lawful attorney
for each of us and in each of our names, places and steads to sign and cause to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission said Annual Report with any
necessary exhibits, and any amendments thereto that may be required.

Very truly yours,


    /s/  Kenneth Whipple                       /s/ Michael T. Monahan
 --------------------------------        ---------------------------------------
         Kenneth Whipple                           Michael T. Monahan


                                               /s/ Joseph F. Paquette, Jr
 --------------------------------        ---------------------------------------
         John M. Deutch                            Joseph F. Paquette, Jr.


    /s/ James J. Duderstadt
 --------------------------------        ---------------------------------------
        James J. Duderstadt                        William U. Parfet


    /s/ Kathleen R. Flaherty                   /s/ Percy A. Pierre
 --------------------------------        ---------------------------------------
        Kathleen R. Flaherty                       Percy A. Pierre


                                               /s/ S. Kinnie Smith, Jr.
 --------------------------------        ---------------------------------------
        Earl D. Holton                             S. Kinnie Smith, Jr.



    /s/ David W. Joos                          /s/ Kenneth L. Way
 --------------------------------        ---------------------------------------
        David W. Joos                              Kenneth L. Way


                              /s/ John B. Yasinksy
                          ----------------------------
                                John B. Yasinsky
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 80 2

. STEVE COOPER et a l

. v . ORMA LACKEY, SUPERI NTENDENT OF ELECTI ONS CI TY OF FORT OGLETHORPE et a l

.
St ev e Co o p er bro ug h t an act i o n ch al l en g i n g t h e q ual i fi cat i o n s o f can d i d at e Ch arl es L

. Sh arro ck

. A ft er t h e s u p eri n t en d en t o f el ect i o n s r efu sed to rem o v e Sh arro ck fro m t h e b al lo t , Co o p er ap p e a l e d t o s up eri o r co u rt

. Th e s up eri o r co u rt
act i on was d i s m i s s ed
, an d t h e co u rt award ed OC GA § 9 -1 5 -1 4 at t o rn ey fees to d efen d an t Sh arro ck . Co o p er t h en fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap p eal

. Pu rs uan t to t h e Geo rg i a co n st i t u t i o n , ap p eal s i n cas es o f el ect i o n co n t es t s are wi t h i n t h e ex cl u s i v e ap p el l at e ju ri s d i ct i o n o f t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

. See Ga. Co n s t

. o f
1 9 8 3 , Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (2 ); Jo r d a n v. Co ok
, 2 7 7 Ga. 1 5 5 (5 8 7 SE2 d 5 2 ) (2 0 0 3 ) (ap p eal fro m s up eri o r co u rt ’ s d i s m i s sal o f ap p eal fro m op i n i o n b y s u p eri n t en d en t o f el ect io n s). Th e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ex erci s ed i t s el ect io n -co n t es t ju ri s d ict i o n in
ap p eal s fro m OCGA § 9 -1 5 -1 4 award s s u ch cas es

. See Da vi s v. D u n n , 2 8 6 Ga. 5 8 2 (6 9 0 SE2 d 3 8 9 ) (2 0 1 0 ). Th erefo re, t h i s ap peal i s TRANSFERRED to t h e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s po s it i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/03/2016 February 03, 2016