DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 6, 2021 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-00931-CV
ANITA HUTCHINGS AND HAYLEY HUTCHINGS, Appellants V. THE BERSHIRE COMPANIES, L.P. D/B/A THE KRUPP COMPANIES, L. P., DANA HAMPTON, AGENT TIGOR HARDON O, AGENT CHRISTINA HILLEBRAND, AGENT JOHN WU, AGENT CHELSEA ANTON, CONSERVICE, L.L.C., PARCEL PENDING, INC., QUADIE NT, INC., HOOVER SLOVACEK ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LL P, HOWARD BOOKSTAFF, COLBY BINFORD, AN D DANIEL EDMUNDS, Appellees On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 471-02530-2021
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Goldstein, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith The Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as there did not appear to be an appealable order. We directed a ppellants to file a letter brief addressing our concern with an opportunity for appellees to file a response. Appellants have complied. Generally, appellate cour ts have jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments and certain interlocutory orders as permitted by statute. See Lehmann v.–2– Har-Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); see also T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN . § 51.014(a). A final judgment is one that disposes of all parties and
claims. See Lehman , 39 S.W.3d at 195. Appellants filed a lawsuit against thir teen defendants. Four of those defendants, appellees Hoover Slovacek At torneys at Law, LLP, Howard Bookstaff, Colby Binford, and Daniel Edmunds, filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to the Texas Citizen’s Participation Act (TCPA). See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN . § 27.003. Appellants appeal from the trial court’s September 7, 2021 order granting that motion. That order, however, is neith er a final judgment, as it does not dispose of all parties and all claims, nor an appealable interlocutory order. See id

. § 51.014(a)(12) (party may appeal an in terlocutory order de nying a TCPA motion to dismiss). We note that the order states it is “final as to the severed cause.” However, the record befo re this Court does not c ontain a severance order. Although appellants filed a letter brief, nothing therein demonstrates our jurisdiction over this appeal. 1 We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a).

210931F.P05

1 Appellants note the District Clerk has not provided them with a copy of the clerk’s record which impacts their ability to respond to our jurisdictional le tter. Appellants, however, do not assert that a final judgment exists. /Crai g Smith / CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

ANITA HUTCHINGS AND HAYLEY HUTCHINGS, Appellants

No. 05-21-00931-CV V.

THE BERSHIRE COMPANIES , L.P. D/B/A THE KRUPP COMPANIES, L.P., DANA HAMPTON, AGENT TIGOR HARDONO, AGENT CHRISTINA HILLEBRAND, AGENT JOHN WU, AGENT CHELSEA ANTON, CONSERVICE, L. L.C., PARCEL PENDING, INC., QUADIENT, INC., HOOVER SLOVACEK ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP, HOWARD BOOKSTAFF, COLBY BINFORD, AND DANIEL EDMUNDS, Appellees On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 471-02530- 2021. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Pedersen, III and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’s op inion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered December 6, 2021