alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Rex T.Clevenger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

Date:May 10, 2010

 
| /s/  Rex T. Clevenger        |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Rex T. Clevenger             |   |
| Executive Vice President and |   |
| Chief Financial Officer      |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Russell Goldsmith, certify that:

 

1.                  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of City National Corporation; and

 

2.                  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| **DATE:**March 4, 2011 | /s/ RUSSELL GOLDSMITH   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|
| ** **                  | **RUSSELL GOLDSMITH**   |
|                        | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of this Certification required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are omitted pursuant to SEC Compliance & Disclosure Interpretation Question 161.01.

 

----
Exhibit 32.2







AEROSONIC CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# Table of Contents

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aerosonic Corporation (the Company) for the period ending January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary E. Colbert, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



March 31, 2004







/s/ Gary E. Colbert



Gary E. Colbert

Chief Financial Officer







TPA:316553:1
**EXHIBIT 23(b)**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

Board of Directors 

OXIS International, Inc.

Portland OR 

 

**CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

As independent public accountants, we consent to the incorporation of our audit report dated February 13, 2004, on the financial statements of OXIS International, Inc. as of December 31, 2003, and 2002, included inthis Form 10-KSB, and into the Company’s previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statements No. 333-113507, 333-104718, and 333-54600. 

 

Williams & Webster, P.S. 

*Certified Public Accountants*

Spokane, Washington 

March 26, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
December 31, 1997 Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Earnings for the
year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                    14,693
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            123,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                               2,894
<INVENTORY>                                              256,736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         427,443
<PP&E>                                                   678,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                           391,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           933,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    239,578
<BONDS>                                                  757,578
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                     705
<OTHER-SE>                                             (359,161)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             933,034
<SALES>                                                1,314,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,314,869
<CGS>                                                    898,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            218,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        54,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          143,749
<INCOME-TAX>                                              48,875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       94,874
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                              94,874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               1.42
        


</TABLE>
#### Pedro Leon DIAZ; Marisela Corona Rivera, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-73413.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.**

Filed Dec. 28, 2007.

Joye L. Wiley, Ark *&*Wiley, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wendtland, Esq., Don G. Scrog-gin, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Pedro Leon Diaz and his wife Marisela Corona Rivera seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their applications for cancellation of removal. To the extent we have *765jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings, *see Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir.2001), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003).

Petitioners’ contention that the IJ violated their due process rights by disregarding their evidence of hardship is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“ [Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute color-able constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).

We lack jurisdiction to review petitioners’ contention that the IJ violated due process by exhibiting bias because petitioners failed to raise this claim before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (noting that due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted).

We are not persuaded that petitioners’ removal results in the deprivation of their child’s rights. *See Cabrera-Alvarez v. Gonzales,*423 F.3d 1006, 1012-13 (9th Cir. 2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133123 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133123 

 COA: 271958 

Kent CC: 97-003376-FC 

JAMES M. DEWEESE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting 

statement in People v Houlihan, 480 Mich 1165 (2008). 

d0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSARIO ANTON; MAYRA DOLORES

MARTINEZ LEAL,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-72070

Agency Nos. A075-653-149

A095-317-278

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 17, 2015** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Rosario Anton and Mayra Dolores Martinez Leal, natives and citizens of

Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial

of their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion

FILED

FEB 24 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny

the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ untimely

motion to reopen based on changed country conditions, where petitioners’ motion

failed to specifically identify any evidence presented to show that conditions in

Mexico had in fact changed from the time of their initial removal hearing. See

8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c); see also Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987 (requiring that evidence

of changed country conditions “be ‘qualitatively different’ from the evidence

presented at the previous hearing”) (citation omitted). We reject petitioners’

contentions that the BIA applied the incorrect legal standard and/or failed to

adequately review the evidence. See Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990-91 (BIA

adequately considered evidence and sufficiently announced its decision); see also

Shooshtary v. INS, 39 F.3d 1049, 1051 (9th Cir. 1994) (“[T]he preciseness we

require of the Board depends upon the preciseness of the proof offered by the

petitioner.”). Finally, we reject petitioners’ contention that the BIA erred by

failing to make a finding regarding whether petitioners are members of a particular

social group. See Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 986 (BIA may deny a motion to reopen

on any of at least three separate grounds).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 12-72070
EXHIBIT 32(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of OXIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), I, Ray R. Rogers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    RAY R. ROGERS                                
|                                                    
|Ray R. Rogers Chief Executive Officer March 26, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                       703
<INVENTORY>                                      2,271
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,020
<PP&E>                                          44,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,320
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,296
<SALES>                                         47,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,069
<CGS>                                           34,925
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,925
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,576
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,561
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,039
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (684)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.1

 



 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY(1)

(effective January 1, 2012)

 

	
ANNUAL CASH RETAINER
    	
·
    	
Annual   retainer
    	
 
    	
·    $40,000
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
ADDITIONAL CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD/LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR   CASH COMPENSATION
    	
·
    	
Annual   retainer
    	
 
    	
·    $20,000
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
ADDITIONAL COMMITTEE CHAIR CASH COMPENSATION
    	
·
   ·
    	
Annual   retainer (Audit)

Annual   retainer (Compensation)
    	
 
    	
·    $22,000

·    $14,000
    
	
 
    	
·
    	
Annual   retainer (Corporate Governance & Nominating)
    	
 
    	
·    $10,000
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
ADDITIONAL COMMITTEE MEMBER CASH COMPENSATION(2)
    	
·
   ·
    	
Annual   retainer (Audit)

Annual   retainer (Compensation) 
    	
 
    	
·    $10,000

·    $6,000
    
	
 
    	
·
    	
Annual   retainer (Corporate Governance & Nominating)
    	
 
    	
·    $4,000
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
INITIAL STOCK OPTION AWARD
    	
·
   ·
    	
Number   of shares (all directors)

Additional   shares for Board Chair
    	
 
    	
·    30,000

·    15,000(3)
    
	
 
    	
·
    	
Vesting   period
    	
 
    	
·    3   years
    
	
 
    	
·
    	
Vesting   increment
    	
 
    	
·    Monthly
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
ANNUAL STOCK OPTION AWARD
    	
·
   ·
    	
Number   of shares (all directors)

Additional   shares for Board Chair
    	
 
    	
·    15,000(4)

·    6,000(4)
    
	
 
    	
·
    	
Vesting   period
    	
 
    	
·    1   year
    
	
 
    	
·
    	
Vesting   increment
    	
 
    	
·    Monthly
    


 




(1)          All stock option awards shall be made pursuant to the Non-Employee Directors’ Nonstatutory Stock Option Program under the 2004 Plan. All annual retainer payments will be made in advance, in equal quarterly installments during the year based on the individual’s role as of the commencement of the given quarter.

(2)          Committee Chair is not also eligible for cash compensation as a member of the same committee for which he/she is paid for service as the committee chair.

(3)          To be granted upon his/her initial appointment to the applicable position, in addition to the stock option award granted to all directors upon initial election to the Board.

(4)          Awarded at the annual meeting of stockholders following election to the Board and/or appointment as Board Chair, subject to pro-ration for any partial period of service in accordance with the terms of the 2004 Plan.
#### Cathleen M. Wilson, Individually and as Executrix of William C. Wilson, Deceased, Appellant, v Town of Webb, et al., Respondents.

[852 NYS2d 906]

Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,**

**As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to my knowledge, the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 of Graphic PackagingCorporation (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ STEPHEN M. HUMPHREY                      |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Name: Stephen M. Humphrey                    |
|   |   | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | August 9, 2005                               |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 99.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the use of our reports dated February 25, 2016 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Repsol Oil & Gas Canada Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated statements of loss, comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, included in an exhibit to the Annual Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

(Signed) *“Ernst & Young LLP”*

Calgary, Canada

February 25, 2016

 

1

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2013-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

Date: March 30, 2016



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior
Securitization Officer)
|Navient Funding, LLC