alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24NORTHWEST PIPELINE CORPORATIONPOWER OF ATTORNEY     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each of the undersigned individuals, in their capacity asa director or officer, or both, as hereinafter set forth below their signature, of NORTHWESTPIPELINE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (“NWP”), does hereby constitute and appoint RICHARD D.RODEKOHR AND R. RAND CLARK their true and lawful attorneys and each of them (with full power to actwithout the other) their true and lawful attorneys for them and in their name and in their capacityas a director or officer, or both, of NWP, as hereinafter set forth below their signature, to signNWP’s Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2005, and any and all amendments thereto or all instruments necessary orincidental in connection therewith; and     THAT the undersigned NWP does hereby constitute and appoint RICHARD D. RODEKOHR AND R. RANDCLARK its true and lawful attorneys and each of them (with full power to act without the other) itstrue and lawful attorney for it and in its name and on its behalf to sign said Form 10-K and anyand all amendments thereto and any and all instruments necessary or incidental in connectiontherewith.     Each of said attorneys shall have full power of substitution and resubstitution, and saidattorneys or any of them or any substitute appointed by any of them hereunder shall have full powerand authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of each of the undersigned, in any andall capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done in the premises, as fully toall intents and purposes as each of the undersigned might or could do in person, the undersignedhereby ratifying and approving the acts of said attorneys or any of them or of any such substitutepursuant hereto.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this instrument, all as of the1st day of March, 2006.   /s/ Phillip D. Wright /s/ Richard D. Rodekohr   Phillip D. Wright
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 25, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on HEDGE IV (“HEDGE IV”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, The G.I.E. Regienov, Boulogne Billancourt, FRANCE, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and HEDGE IV intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On February 14, 2017, HEDGE IV filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 27, 2017 (82 FR 15238).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 9, 2017. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 20, 2017 (82 FR 33516).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2017-18173 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 11, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D19-2252

Lower Tribunal No. 19-918

________________

Rodolfo J. Salgado-Martinez, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

SafePoint Insurance Company,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas J. 

Rebull and Veronica Diaz, Judges.

Rodriguez Tramont & Núñez, P.A., and Andrew V. Tramont, Paul M. 

Núñez and Paulino A. Núñez, Jr., for appellants.

 Bickford & Chidnese, LLP and Patrick M. Chidnese (Tampa); Cole, 

Scott & Kissane, P.A., and George A. Hooker, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 780 

To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2015 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cameras in the Court5 room Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 28. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 45 of title 28, United 

8 States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the fol9 lowing: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 780 IS

1 ‘‘§ 678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings 

2 ‘‘The Supreme Court shall permit television coverage 

3 of all open sessions of the Court unless the Court decides, 

4 by a vote of the majority of justices, that allowing such 

5 coverage in a particular case would constitute a violation 

6 of the due process rights of 1 or more of the parties before 

7 the Court.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The chapter analysis 

9 for chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is amended 

10 by inserting at the end the following: 

‘‘678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      10,577,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,688,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                120,465,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             210,145,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,927,000
<BONDS>                                    137,042,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        91,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,085,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               210,145,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,974,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,771,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,203,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,103,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,100,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of The Finish Line, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 26, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78); and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          |  |                     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|Dated: September 21, 2006                                                
|                                                                          | 
|By:                                                                       |  | /s/ Alan H. Cohen   
|Alan H. Cohen                                                            
|Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer                                     
|                                                                          | 
|By:                                                                       |  | /s/ Kevin S. Wampler
|Kevin S. Wampler                                                         
|Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary
#### UNITED STATES v. Samuel LEISER.

Crim. Nos. 54-168-A, 54-190-A.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

Sept. 27, 1954.

Lawrence Urbano, Asst. U. S. Atty., Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Paul Troy, Boston, Mass., for defendant.

ALDRICH, District Judge.

The defendant’s motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41 (e), 18 U.S.C.A., to return seized property, and suppress evidence is continued until the trial. The defendant contends that the court has no power to do this, but must pass upon the motion in advance of the trial. It would take a considerable showing to persuade me that a court does not have general discretion in such procedural matters. Panzich v. U. S., 9 Cir., 285 F. 871; U. S. v. Johnson, D.C.M.D.Pa., 76 F.Supp. 538. I am aware of no contrary authority.

Both parties refer to the last sentence of the rule, which reads as follows:

> “The motion shall be made before trial or hearing unless opportunity therefor did not exist or the defend*200ant was not aware of the grounds for the motion, but the court in its discretion may entertain the motion at the trial or hearing.”

The word “entertain” has several meanings. Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 461, 73 S.Ct. 397, 409. One of these would seem to contradict the defendant’s contensions, while others would not. Though as a matter of semantics this sentence might have been better expressed, neither it, nor any other part of the rule, leads me to adopt the defendant’s conclusion.

The defendant further argues that if I have discretion, still I should not postpone the matter to the trial, because of possible prejudice before the jury. Suffice it to say that it presently appears that the allowance of his motion, if that should be the eventual disposition, would result in a dismissal of the entire proceedings, so that there would be no jury left to be prejudiced. If something unanticipated develops, it can be taken care of when it arises.
No. 1284.

#### Klein *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

June 10, 1946.

*Leonard M. Rieser*for petitioner.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT KEITH L. JONES, II, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4112 ) CHRISTINA M. JONES, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 5, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; John Radabaugh, Judge. Kevin P. Cox of Law Office of Kevin P. Cox, Auburndale, for Appellant. Robin H. Stevenson of Law Office of Robin H. Stevenson, Bartow, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
     with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"), I John W. Hlywak, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
     certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
     of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                                                  /s/John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     November 13, 2003



Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
any other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,183
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     29,617
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,309
<PP&E>                                         317,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 239,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,061
<BONDS>                                        145,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,172
<OTHER-SE>                                    (31,903)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   239,865
<SALES>                                        400,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               403,952
<CGS>                                          384,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  384,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,892)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 23(a)

                         Independent Auditors' Consent


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-
64451 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statements Nos. 33-61087, 333-5921, 333-
18041, and 333-61993 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 26, 1999 (which
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern) appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of OXIS International, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1998.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Portland, Oregon

March 26, 1999

                                      52
EXHIBIT 99.2           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  of Viking
Capital Group,  Inc. (the  "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Matthew W.  Fossen,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 14, 2002    /s/ Matthew W. Fossen
                             ---------------------
                             Matthew W. Fossen
                             Chief Financial Officer








                                                                              32
EXHIBIT 21

                SUBSIDIARIES AND JOINT VENTURE OF THE COMPANY


As of March 31, 2005, the Company owned a majority to 100% of the
following securities of the following subsidiaries and Joint Venture:


                                           Charter/Joint Venture
                                           ---------------------
Included in the                 %
Consolidated Statements     Ownership      Place            Date
-----------------------     ---------      -----            ----
Homespan Realty Co., Inc.
 ("Homespan")                 100.0       Wisconsin       02/12/1959
Ecomm Group Inc.
 ("Ecomm")                    100.0       Wisconsin       06/24/1974
San Luis Estates, Inc.
 ("SLE")                      100.0       Colorado        11/09/1970
San Sebastian Gold
 Mines, Inc. ("Sanseb")        82.5       Nevada          09/04/1968
Universal Developers, Inc.
 ("UDI")                      100.0       Wisconsin       09/28/1964
Commerce/Sanseb Joint
 Venture ("Joint Venture")     90.0       Wisconsin       09/22/1987
                                          & El Salvador

Not included in the
Consolidated Statements
-------------------------
Mineral San Sebastian,
 S.A. de C.V.  ("Misanse")    52.0       El Salvador      05/08/1960
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2022_6_10_17_41" style="width: 95%;"><caption> <span class="tableTitle">Chart 8. Effect of additional covariates on the between-group variance of Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey hourly wages, 2000–19</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; min-width: 80px;" rowspan="1" scope="col">Timespan</th>
<th scope="col">Occupation baseline</th>
<th scope="col">+ industry</th>
<th scope="col">+ Interaction with MSA</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2002 to 2005</p>
</th>
<td>0.1236</td>
<td>0.0166</td>
<td>0.0075</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2007 to 2010</p>
</th>
<td>0.1337</td>
<td>0.0157</td>
<td>0.0072</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2010 to 2013</p>
</th>
<td>0.1432</td>
<td>0.0165</td>
<td>0.0069</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2013 to 2016</p>
</th>
<td>0.1391</td>
<td>0.0155</td>
<td>0.0066</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2016 to 2019</p>
</th>
<td>0.1301</td>
<td>0.0145</td>
<td>0.0069</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2022_6_10_17_41_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="4">
<p>Note: MSA = metropolitan statistical area.</p>
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p></p>
Agreement to furnish instruments and agreements



 EXHIBIT 4.0 
 NB&T FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 
 48 N. South Street 
 Wilmington, OH 45177 
 March 17, 2009 
 Securities and Exchange Commission 
 100 F Street, NE 
 Washington, D.C. 20549 
 Re: NB&T Financial Group, Inc. – Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 NB&T Financial Group, Inc., an Ohio corporation
(“NBTF”), is today filing an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Form 10-K”), as executed on March 17, 2009. 
 Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, NBTF hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights
of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K. Such long-term debt does not exceed 10% of the total assets of NBTF and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/ John J. Limbert
	 John J. Limbert
 President and
CEO


  

 64