alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Opinion Filed March 9, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-22-00548-CV JORDAN COGBURN, Appellant V. MELANIE CREEKMORE, Appellee On Appeal from the 15th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-18-1125
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Smith, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness Before the Court is Appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss appeal. In the motion, Appellant informs the Court that the parties have reached a settlement and resolved all outstanding issues in this case. Appellant asks this Court to dismiss the appeal with prejudice. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal with prejudice.
See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

220548F.P05 /Robbie Partida-Kipness / ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
JORDAN COGBURN, Appellant

No. 05-22-00548-CV V. MELANIE CREEKMORE, Appellee On Appeal from the 15th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-18-1125.Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Smith and Breedlove participating. In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

. It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 9th day of March 2023.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of The Finish Line, Inc.
(the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the thirteen and twentysix weeks ended August 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78); and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 26, 2008                                                                 
|                                                                                          
|/s/ Alan H. Cohen                                                                         
|Alan H. Cohen Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                                        
|                                                                                          
|/s/ Kevin S. Wampler                                                                      
|Kevin S. Wampler Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The
Finish Line, Inc. and will be retained by The Finish Line, Inc. and forwarded to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Notice of Rescinding the Record of Decision (ROD) for the State 
Route 704, Cross Base Highway Project in Pierce County, Washington

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Rescinding the Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Highway Administration is issuing this notice to 
advise the public that the Record of Decision for the proposed State 
Route 704 Cross Base Highway in Pierce County, Washington is being 
rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Dean Moberg, Area Engineer, 
Washington Division, Federal Highway Administration, 711 Capitol Way, 
Suite 501, Olympia, WA 98501.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, as the lead federal agency, in 
cooperation with the Washington State Department of Transportation and 
Pierce County published a Record of Decision (ROD) on August 2, 2004 
for the State Route 704 Cross Base Highway Project. This project 
involved a new arterial highway between State Route 7 and Interstate 5 
in Pierce County. Since that time, WSDOT has only advanced one of five 
project stages, but has not advanced further design, right of way 
acquisition or construction of the other stages since 2007 due to 
public policy, litigation and transportation demand reasons. The FHWA 
has determined that the ROD dated August 2, 2004 for the September 2003 
Final Environmental Impact Statement on this project is no longer a 
valid document without further environment analysis and review pursuant 
to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act pursuant 
to 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq. and 23 Code of Federal Regulations 771 and 
therefore will be rescinded. Comments and questions concerning this 
proposed action should be directed to FHWA at the address provided 
above.

    Issued on: August 22, 2017.
Daniel M. Mathis,
Division Administrator, Washington Division, Federal Highway 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-18262 Filed 8-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael June, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 519]

Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Smith, Centra and Green, JJ.
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 31 0- CV Her bert L awr ence P OLINARD , J R., Appellant
v . Richard F
. SCIARAF F A and Richar d F. Sciar aff a, Jr., Appellee s Fr om the 57th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2006-CI -01691 Honora ble J anet L ittlejohn, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice

Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Deliver ed and F iled: Aug ust 27, 2008 DI SMI SSED FOR L ACK OF J URI SDI CTI ON Fr om our initial revi ew o f t h e record it appe are d that the summary judgme nt sought to be
a pp e a le d is int e rl oc uto ry

be c a us e it d oe s no t dis po se of the a pp e lla nt’ s oth e r pe nd ing c la ims a g a ins t Richard F . Sciara ffa , Sr., and no seve ranc e orde r appe ars in the r ecor d. T h ere fore , we or dere d appellant to show c ause in wr iting why this appeal should not be dismissed for lac k of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. B ased on our revie w of the recor d, we c onclude that the summar y judgme nt order is not final a nd appea lable beca u s e it does not dispose of all par ties and ca

uses of0 4
- 0 8
- 0 0 3 1 0
- C V

- 2- action in this suit. Se e City of B e au mo nt v . G uil lor

y , 7 51 S.W. 2d

49 1, 49 2 ( Te x. 19 88 ); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp. , 39 S.W .3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001). Ther efor e, this appea l is dism issed for lac k of jurisdiction. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42 .3 (a ). Cos ts o f a pp e a l are ta xed

a g a ins t a pp e lla nt. PER C URI AM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Capital Planning Commission

# AGENCY:

National Capital Planning Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of Members of Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board.

# SUMMARY:

                        The current United States Code or its supplement requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more Performance Review Boards (PRB) to review, evaluate and make a final recommendation on performance appraisals assigned to individual members of the agency's Senior Executive Service (SES). The PRB established for the National Capital Planning Commission also makes recommendations to the agency head regarding SES performance awards, rank awards and bonuses. The current United States Code or its supplement also requires that notice of appointment of Performance Review Board members be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

The following persons have been appointed to serve as members of the Performance Review Board for the National Capital Planning Commission: Vicki Barber, Mary John, Paige Cottinghamstreater, and Christopher J. Roscetti from October 23, 2017 to October 22, 2019.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Deborah Young, Administrative Officer, National Capital Planning Commission, 401 9th Street NW., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20004, (202) 482-7228.

Dated: August 21, 2017.

Barry S. Socks,

Chief Operating Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-17973 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 637 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and modify the 

railroad track maintenance credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2015 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. CASEY, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

and modify the railroad track maintenance credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Short Line Railroad 

5 Rehabilitation and Investment Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 637 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF RAILROAD 

2 TRACK MAINTENANCE CREDIT. 

3 (a) EXTENSION OF CREDIT.—Section 45G(f) of the 

4 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘January 1, 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2017’’. 

6 (b) EXPENDITURES.—Subsection (d) of section 45G 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to quali8 fied railroad track maintenance expenditures) is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘for maintaining’’ and all that follows and in10 serting ‘‘for maintaining— 

11 ‘‘(A) in the case of taxable years beginning 

12 after December 31, 2004, and before January 

13 1, 2015, railroad track (including roadbed, 

14 bridges, and related track structures) owned or 

15 leased as of January 1, 2005, by a Class II or 

16 Class III railroad (determined without regard 

17 to any consideration for such expenditures 

18 given by the Class II or Class III railroad which 

19 made the assignment of such track), and 

20 ‘‘(B) in the case of taxable years beginning 

21 after December 31, 2014, railroad track (in22 cluding roadbed, bridges, and related track 

23 structures) owned or leased as of January 1, 

24 2015, by a Class II or Class III railroad (deter25 mined without regard to any consideration for 

26 such expenditures given by the Class II or Class 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 637 IS

1 III railroad which made the assignment of such 

2 track).’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
23.2  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS   We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of the previously filed Registration Statement of Forms S-8
(Registration No. 333-43072) filed on August 4, 2000; S-3 (Registration No 333-38698)
filed on June 6, 2000; S-3 (Registration No. 333-33498) filed on March 29,
2000; S-8 Registration No. 333-32226) filed on March 10, 2000; and S-8
(Registration No. 333-88541) filed on October 6, 1999 of Inamed Corporation and
Subsidiaries (Inamed) of our report dated January 21, 2000, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Inamed appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999   /s/
  BDO Seidman, LLPBDO Seidman, LLP  New York, New York March 25, 2002
Exhibit 99.4

CONSENT OF INTERNAL QUALIFIED RESERVES EVALUATOR

I
consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of Talisman Energy Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, of my Report on Reserves Data dated March 13, 2006, included in the 2005 Annual Information Form of Talisman Energy Inc. (the "AIF"), and to the references to
my name in the AIF.

I
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-9 (No. 333-130261) pertaining to U.S. $2 Billion aggregate
principal amount of Debt Securities and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-12812) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan and Director Stock
Option Plan of Talisman Energy Inc. of my Report on Reserves Data dated March 13, 2006 and to the references to my name in the AIF, which are incorporated by reference in this annual
report on Form 40-F.

|                |  | By: | /s/MICHAEL ADAMS                     
|--------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------
|Calgary, Canada |  |     | Michael Adams                        
|March 13, 2006  |  |     | Internal Qualified Reserves Evaluator

---



QuickLinks
#### In the Matter of Crystal M., an Infant. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Matthew A.M., Sr., Appellant.

[856 NYS2d 376]

*1313Memorandum: Family Court properly terminated respondent father’s parental rights on the ground of abandonment. Petitioner established that, in the six months immediately preceding the filing of the petition, the father failed to visit or communicate with his child, and we conclude that his sole contact with petitioner during the statutory period “was insubstantial and thus does not preclude the finding of abandonment” *(Matter of William N.,*17 AD3d 1158, 1159 [2005]; *see Matter of Jasmine J.,*43 AD3d 1444 [2007]; *Matter of Timothy H.,*37 AD3d 1119 [2007], *lv denied*8 NY3d 813 [2007]). We thus conclude that petitioner established by the requisite clear and convincing evidence that the father abandoned his child *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [b]; [5] [a]; *Matter of Anthony T.,*35 AD3d 1201 [2006], *lv denied*8 NY3d 809 [2007]). Contrary to the further contention of the father, petitioner neither prevented nor discouraged him from visiting with his child. Indeed, the record establishes that, when the father contacted petitioner concerning visitation, the caseworker advised him to obtain a copy of the order setting forth the manner in which the supervised visitation was to occur, and she informed him that she would then make the arrangements for the supervised visitation. Petitioner’s “[insistence upon compliance with the court order [with respect to supervised visitation] is not interference or willful conduct sufficient to preclude a finding of abandonment” *(Matter of Andrea A.,*12 AD3d 991, 992 [2004], *lv denied 4*NY3d 705 [2005]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Smith, Centra and Pine, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          31,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  404,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,647
<INVENTORY>                                  2,108,759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,658,363
<PP&E>                                       1,197,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,899,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,468,537
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    26,964,647
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,592,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,899,492
<SALES>                                        463,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               463,167
<CGS>                                          727,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  727,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,077
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,975,343)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,975,343)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,975,343)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report ofHarbinger Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas A. Williams, as ExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

March 25, 2013 

This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gary D.Blackford, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:November 9, 2009

 
| /s/  Gary D. Blackford     |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Gary  D. Blackford         |   |
| Chairman  of the Board and |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer   |   |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 45 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 45

To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify 
    those classes of individuals born in the United States who are 
         nationals and citizens of the United States at birth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 7, 2015

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify 
    those classes of individuals born in the United States who are 
         nationals and citizens of the United States at birth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Birthright Citizenship Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH FOR CERTAIN PERSONS BORN IN THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1401) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
        following'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (a) through (h) as 
        paragraphs (1) through (8), respectively, and indenting such 
        paragraphs, as redesignated, an additional 2 ems to the right; 
        and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Definition.--Acknowledging the right of birthright 
citizenship established by section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States, a person born in the United States 
shall be considered `subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States 
for purposes of subsection (a)(1) only if the person is born in the 
United States and at least 1 of the person's parents is--
            ``(1) a citizen or national of the United States;
            ``(2) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in 
        the United States whose residence is in the United States; or
            ``(3) an alien performing active service in the armed 
        forces (as defined in section 101 of title 10, United States 
        Code).''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a)(3) may not 
be construed to affect the citizenship or nationality status of any 
person born before the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```