alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.16
                          -------------

                            AGREEMENT

     This is an Agreement made May 25, 1999, by and among Commerce Group
Corp. ("Commerce"), a Wisconsin corporation with its principal place of
business at 6001 North 91st Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53225, and The
Interactive Business Channel ("IBC"), a Delaware corporation, with its
principal place of business located at 19800 MacArthur Boulevard, #880,
Irvine, California, 92612, and Ecomm Group Inc. ("Ecomm"), a Wisconsin
corporation with its principal place of business at 6001 North 91st
Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53225.

     WHEREAS, on the 27th day of January, 1999, Commerce and IBC entered
into an Agreement, to, among other things, develop Ecomm's Web Portal
site;

     WHEREAS, the parties wish to modify certain provisions of that
agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

     1.  Web Site Development.  The IBC will continue to design, develop,
market and manage Ecomm's Web Portal site.  The parties incorporate by
reference the "MyInternet.to" Ecomm Group Inc. Business Plan and
projections prepared by Matthew Marcus, and acknowledge that will be the
basic plan for the web portal going forward from this date, which plan
can be from time to time modified by the mutual agreement of the parties.
As President of Ecomm, Matthew Marcus will manage the development of
Ecomm's Web Portal site.

     2.  Compensation.  As compensation for the services of IBC and
Matthew Marcus, Commerce agrees to transfer to IBC 500,000 Rule 144
Restricted shares of Commerce's ten cent ($0.10) par value common stock
after certain dates in accordance with the following timetable:

     1 month after this agreement is signed        100,000 shares
     2 months after this agreement is signed       100,000 shares
     3 months after this agreement is signed       100,000 shares
     4 months after this agreement is signed       100,000 shares
     5 months after this agreement is signed       100,000 shares

     3.  January 27, 1999 Agreement.  In all other respects, the January
27, 1999 Agreement will remain in effect.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument
to be executed in triplicate on the day and year first above written.

COMMERCE GROUP CORP.            INTERACTIVE BUSINESS CHANNEL, INC.


/s/ Edward L. Machulak          /s/ Matthew Marcus
------------------------------  -----------------------------------
By:  Edward L. Machulak         By:  Matthew Marcus, President
     President


ECOMM GROUP INC.


/s/ Matthew Marcus
------------------------------
By:  Matthew Marcus, President
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 479 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 

Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 

Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mrs. FISCHER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the 

Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on the 

feasibility of designating the Chief Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC 

4 TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY. 

5 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 479 IS

1 ‘‘(46) CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HIS2 TORIC TRAIL.— 

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Chief Standing 

4 Bear Trail, extending approximately 550 miles 

5 from Niobrara, Nebraska, to Ponca City, Okla6 homa, which follows the route taken by Chief 

7 Standing Bear and the Ponca people during 

8 Federal Indian removal, and approximately 550 

9 miles from Ponca City, Oklahoma, through 

10 Omaha, Nebraska, to Niobrara, Nebraska, 

11 which follows the return route taken by Chief 

12 Standing Bear and the Ponca people, as gen13 erally depicted on the map entitled ‘Chief 

14 Standing Bear National Historic Trail Feasi15 bility Study’, numbered 903/125,630, and dated 

16 November 2014. 

17 ‘‘(B) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map 

18 described in subparagraph (A) shall be on file 

19 and available for public inspection in the appro20 priate offices of the Department of the Interior. 

21 ‘‘(C) COMPONENTS.—The feasibility study 

22 conducted under subparagraph (A) shall include 

23 a determination on whether the Chief Standing 

24 Bear Trail meets the criteria described in subVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:04 Feb 24, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S479.IS S479

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 479 IS

1 section (b) for designation as a national historic 

2 trail. 

3 ‘‘(D) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting 

4 the feasibility study under subparagraph (A), 

5 the Secretary of the Interior shall consider 

6 input from owners of private land within or ad7 jacent to the study area.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
8323

#### KUHN v. ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING AND POWER CO.

Injuítction — Charters-—Secretary op State. — In the absence of a showing that pending an appeal from an order restraining the secretary of ’ state from granting amendments to certain charters, that snch order will result in irreparable injury or miscarriage of justice, a supersedeas order should not be granted.

Petition by respondents before Mr. Justice Woods at chambers in James S. Kuhn and William S. Kuhn against Electric Manufacturing añd Power Co., Spartanburg Railway, Gas and- Electric Co.i and R. M. McCown, as Secretary of State, of whom the plaintiffs are appellants.

*489*Messrs. Johnson, Nash & Daniel,*for petitioners.

*Messrs. Caldwell, Manlich & Reed, Sanders & DePass, Lyles & Lyles,*contra.

September 21, *1912.*

Mr. Justice Woods.

On the 30th day of August, 1912, Hon. T. S. Sease, Circuit Judge, made an order'enjoining the defendants “from taking any action looking to the amendment of the charter of either of the defendant corporations in the particulars shown by the resolutions and petitions of each defendant filed with the Secretary of State on the 23d of August and set forth in the record at this hearing.” Pending their appeal from this order, the defendants have presented their petition to me, after due notice to the plaintiffs, asking for an order superseding the order of injunction and for a writ of mandamus requiring the secretary of state to sign and issue certificates o.f the proposed amendments to the charter of the corporation.

I express no opinion whatever as to the merits of the cause, which involves difficult questions of law, but refuse to supersede the order of injunction on the ground that petitioners have not clearly shown that, pending the appeal, it will result in irreparable injury or the miscarriage of justice. *Andrews*v. *Sumter C. & R. E. Co.,*87 S. C. 301.

The petition for mandamus requiring the Secretary of State to issue certificates of amendments cannot be granted while the injunction stands.

It is therefore ordered that the petition be dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Randy Bailey, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 892]

*1259Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05). We note at the outset that, contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal is not void as against public policy *(see generally People v Muniz,*91 NY2d 570, 573-575 [1998]; *People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273, 280 [1992]; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 7-11 [1989]). The further contention of defendant that his plea was not knowing, voluntary, or intelligent because he did not recite the underlying facts of the crime but simply replied to County Court’s questions with monosyllabic responses is actually a challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution *(see People v Cole,*42 AD3d 963 [2007], *Iv denied*9 NY3d 990 [2007]). That contention is encompassed by defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal *(see id.),*and we further note that defendant failed to preserve his contention for our review by challenging the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution in his motion to withdraw the plea or by moving to vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; *People v Brown,*305 AD2d 1068 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 579 [2003]). In any event, there is no requirement that defendant recite the underlying facts of the crime to which he is pleading guilty *(see Brown,*305 AD2d at 1069). Finally, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw the guilty plea *(see*CPL 220.60 [3]). The record establishes that defendant was afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his factual and legal contentions, which “enabled [the court] to make [the requisite] informed determination” in denying defendant’s motion *(People v Tinsley,*35 NY2d 926, 927 [1974]). Present— Martoche, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,545,574
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  826,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    147,273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,712,756
<PP&E>                                       3,568,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                 906,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,425,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,027,666
<BONDS>                                        301,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,888
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,852,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,425,129
<SALES>                                      3,360,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,630,029
<CGS>                                        2,050,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,050,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,349,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                166,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                    62,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             94,804
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    94,804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
<FN>
Accounts receivable are net of allowance of $135,000 at September 30, 1997.



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                            3,659,390
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       779,568
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                         219,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  5,055,942
<PP&E>                            5,306,245
<DEPRECIATION>                    1,454,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    9,035,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               903,791
<BONDS>                             869,985
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             35,463
<OTHER-SE>                        7,224,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      9,035,947
<SALES>                           5,498,541
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  5,865,571
<CGS>                             3,964,258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     3,964,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,789,529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   72,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (960,821)
<INCOME-TAX>                       (292,462)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (668,359)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (668,359)
<EPS-BASIC>                            (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.19)

<FN>
<F1>
Accounts receivable are net of allowance of $237,000 at December 31, 1999.

</FN>


</TABLE>
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2023_12_18_14_24" style="width: 95%;"><caption><span class="tableTitle">Chart 1. Relative importance of major component indexes within the Producer Price Index for final demand, calculated with 2012 and 2017 value weights, December 2022 (in percent)</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; min-width: 80px;" rowspan="1" scope="col">Index</th>
<th scope="col">2012 relative importance</th>
<th scope="col">2017 relative importance</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>Final-demand goods</p>
</th>
<td>33.6</td>
<td>30.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>Final-demand services</p>
</th>
<td>64.5</td>
<td>66.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>Final-demand construction</p>
</th>
<td>1.9</td>
<td>2.7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2023_12_18_14_24_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="3">
<p>Note: Values may not add to 100 because of rounding.</p>
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p></p>
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00355

- CV

WILLIAM M. WINDSOR

, Appellant

v.

SAM ROUND

, Appellee

From the 378th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 88611

ORDER

William M. Windsor’s Motion to Reduce Cost of Record is denied. Windsor

states that some of the documents are not necessary to his appeal. Windsor, as the

appellant, can designate those documents necessary to his appeal. But it is the

appellant’s burden to present a record sufficient to show reversible error without

omitting anything which could be presumed to be in support of the trial court’s

judgment. See e.g. Bennett v. Cochran , 96 S.W.3d 227, 230 (Tex. 2002). We also note,Windsor v. Round Page 2

based on our own experie nce with Windsor, the filing of voluminous exhibits of

questionable relevance is a problem of his own making.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed June 1 8, 2015
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Ipswich Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
J. Wolnik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"). In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32),
this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B)
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.


/s/ Michael J. Wolnik
--------------------------------------------
Michael J. Wolnik
Chief Financial Officer

June 24, 2004
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Le@P Technology, Inc. (the
Company) for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2003 (the Annual
Report), I, Mary E. Thomas, Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge and belief that the Annual Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)-14(b) or 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: March 23,
      2005
    /s/
      Mary E. Thomas
      
      
      Mary E. Thomas
      Acting Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SS1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Gary D. Blackford, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

                                                                                            __/s/ Gary D. Blackford__________                                                                                            Gary D. Blackford                                                                                            President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer                                                                                            August 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         452,524<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  845,491<F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    186,959
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,556,002
<PP&E>                                       2,263,636
<DEPRECIATION>                                 659,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,323,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,051,608
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    450,000
<COMMON>                                    18,356,052
<OTHER-SE>                                   (535,155)<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,323,764
<SALES>                                        393,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               393,304
<CGS>                                          525,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  525,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,224,258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,094,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,094,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,094,205)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes the Restricted Certificates of Deposit $451,133.
<F2>Includes Stock Subscription Receivable $607,000.
<F3>Note Receivable for Common Stock of $206,763 and Note Receivable for Preferred
Stock of $328,392 are shown as Contra-Equity Accounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000334 14-JUN-2017 07:57 AM
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE : : : : : No. 480 CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA M** 

AND NOW , this 26 th day of September , 201 6 , the Honorable Bruce R. Beemer, Dauphin County , is hereby appointed as a member of the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee for a term expiring January 1, 201 8

.