An official website of the United States government 
	  
	Here is how you know
 Department of Labor Logo  United States Department of Labor
 **The .gov means it's official.**
			 Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information,
			make sure you're on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
			 The
			**https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any
			information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
 Follow Us
 
 Release Calendar Blog
 Search button
          Search:


Menu

  Search button
          Search:
	
	  Follow Us Follow Us on X, formerly referred to as Twitter| Release Calendar | Blog
    Home
        About BLS
		History	
		Our Leadership
		Budget and Performance		
		Questions and Answers	
		A-Z Index	
		Glossary	
		Careers at BLS	
		BLS Speakers Available
		Errata  				
		Contact BLSOverview of BLS Statistics
		Guide to Programs & Services
		Demographics
		Industries
		Business Costs
		Occupations
		GeographyResources For
		Business Leaders
		Consumers
		Developers
		Economists
		Investors
		Jobseekers
		Media
		Public Policymakers
		Researcher		
		Students & Teachers
		Survey Respondents
    Subjects
        Inflation & Prices
		Consumer Price Index
		Producer Price Indexes
		Import/Export Price Indexes
		Contract Escalation
		Price Index Research
		Pay & Benefits
		Employment Cost Index
		Employer Costs for Employee Compensation
						Wage Data by Occupation
		Earnings by Demographics
		Earnings by Industry
		County Wages  
		Benefits
		Modeled Wage Estimates		
		Compensation Research
		Strikes & Lockouts
		Wage Records from Unemployment Insurance
		Occupational RequirementsUnemployment
		National Unemployment Rate
		State & Local Unemployment Rates
		Unemployment Research
		Employment
		National Employment
		State & Local Employment
		County Employment 
		Worker Characteristics
		American Indian Report
		Employment Projections
		Job Openings & Labor Turnover Survey
		Business Response Survey
		Employment by Occupation
		Work Experience Over Time
		Business Employment Dynamics
		Foreign Direct Investment
		Employment Research
		Workplace InjuriesProductivity
		Labor and Total Factor Productivity
		Productivity Research
		Spending & Time Use
		Consumer Expenditures
		How Americans Spend Time			
		International
		International Technical Cooperation
		Import/Export Price Indexes
		Geographic Information
		Northeast (Boston-New York)
		Mid-Atlantic (Philadelphia)
		Southeast (Atlanta)
		Midwest (Chicago)
		Southwest (Dallas)
		Mountain-Plains (Kansas City)
		West (San Francisco)
    Data Tools
        Data Retrieval Tools
		BLS Popular Series
		Series Report
		Top Picks, One Screen, Multi-Screen, and Maps
		Data Finder
		Public Data APICharts and Applications
		Charts for Economic News Releases	
		CPI Inflation Calculator	
		Injury and Illness Calculator		
		Pay Measure Comparison
		Demographic Data Sources
		COVID-19 Economic Trends
		Industry Productivity Viewer
		Employment and Wages Data Viewer
		Industry Finder from the Quarterly Census of Employment and WagesCustomized Tables
		U.S. Economy at a Glance
		Regions, States & Areas at a Glance
		Industry at a Glance			
		Text Files
		News Release Tables
		
		More Sources of Data
		Restricted Data Access
		Discontinued Databases
		Questions & Answers
		Special Notices
    Publications
        Latest Publications
		The Economics Daily
		Monthly Labor Review
		Beyond the Numbers
		Spotlight on Statistics
		Reports
		Commissioner's Corner
		Videos
		Career OutlookOccupational Outlook Handbook
		Geographic Profile
		Handbook of Methods
		Research Papers
		Copyright Information
		Contact & Help
		Weekly Update
    Economic Releases
        Latest Releases
		Major Economic Indicators
		Schedules for news Releases
		By Month
		By News Release
		Current Year
		Prior Years
		Archived News ReleasesEmployment & Unemployment
		Monthly
		Quarterly, annual, and other
		Inflation & Prices
		Pay & Benefits & Workplace Injuries
		Productivity & Technology
		Employment Projections
		Regional News Releases
    Classroom
        K-12 Student & Teacher Resources		
        Games & Quizzes
		Student's Desk
		Teacher's Desk
		Questions & Answers
    Beta
        Redesigned News Releases


Overview
                     Concepts
                     Data sources
                     Design
                     Calculation
                     Presentation
                     HistoryMajor milestones
                     More Info
                 
                 
              
			                   	
                                  
		
		












	
	
	
	
	Methods Home
        About
		Programs
		Glossarysearch
	                 

				 				 				                                                                                                                                                 					
				                
	             Handbook of Methods > 
					                      Current Employment Statistics - State and Metro Area

                 Handbook of Methods Current Employment Statistics - State and Metro Area History
                     Current Employment Statistics - State and Metro Area: History
				  
				   				   
			  
			   				
				
				
				
			   



From its origins in 1915 to today, the Current Employment Statistics - State and Area (CES-SA) program expanded and evolved gradually over time. The program has been shaped by advances in technology and statistical methods, user demand, recommendations from numerous presidential commissions and special panels, and changing resource levels.

Hover over the red dot to see historical information.
Major milestones
**1915**: In October 1915, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) first began to collect employment and payroll data for four manufacturing industries—boots and shoes, cotton goods, cotton finishing, and hosiery and underwear. Data from this survey were published as month-to-month changes in employment and payroll. Before BLS started collecting employment and payroll data, several states conducted surveys of industry employment; New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts were among the first to do so.
**1916**: BLS and the State of New York signed the first cooperative agreement, allowing BLS to use sample data collected by New York in its national estimates.
**1916:** BLS expanded the CES program to publish data for 13 industries at a national level with a sample size of 574 establishments covering 519,185 jobs.
**1920:** Wisconsin became the second state to sign a cooperative agreement with BLS.
**1923:** BLS expanded the program to publish 29 additional manufacturing industries at a national level bringing the total to 52 industries. This expansion was largely attributable to recommendations of the Committee on Employment Statistics commissioned by President Warren G. Harding and a subsequent increase in Congressional funding.
**1927:**Sample size grew to 11,000, and employment and total payroll data were published for 54 manufacturing industries nationally.
**1928:** Seven additional states signed cooperative agreements with BLS.
**1929:** Total sample size expanded to 34,000 establishments. Publication started for 11 nonmanufacturing industries. These advances followed recommendations of committees appointed by the American Statistical Association in 1922–23.
**1930:**A new 6-month shuttle schedule (collection form) replaced the single-month schedule.
**1931:**The Advisory Committee on Employment Statistics commissioned by President Herbert Hoover issued its report, urging benchmarking to Census of Manufacturing, addition of city and state data, collection of hours data in manufacturing, and improved sample coverage for new industries and new firms. Congress appropriated additional funding to these expansions beginning in 1932.
**1932:**BLS publishes data on monthly employment and payroll for all 48 states, the District of Columbia and 13 cities.
**1932:**Additional published series were added (38 industries in manufacturing and 15 in nonmanufacturing), and collection of data on production worker hours began.
**1932:**Federal civil service employment reporting began.
**1932:** For production workers in 15 manufacturing industries, BLS published hours and earnings data for the first time.
**1932:**Sample size increased to 70,000 establishments covering 4.5 million jobs.
**1935:**Congress passed the Social Security Act establishing the unemployment insurance (UI) program. Employers were required to regularly report employment and payroll data to the states. BLS gained access to these data 5 years later and adopted UI employment data as its primary CES benchmark source.
**1936**: BLS published an estimate of nonfarm wage and salary employment for the first time at a national level.
**1936**: Twelve states signed cooperative agreements with BLS.
**1938**: A new 12-month shuttle schedule (collection form) replaced the 6-month shuttle schedule.
**1940:**CES-N published its first UI-based benchmark.
**1940:** Total nonfarm employment data for 48 states and the District of Columbia were published for the first time. States with cooperative agreements began publishing their own estimates. BLS regional offices prepared estimates for all other states.
**1940:** Sample size increased to 148,000 establishments covering 8.4 million workers.
**1947:** The 1945 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system was implemented for manufacturing industries.
**1947:** Sample coverage increased to cover 180 industries—covering 148,000 establishments and 12.5 million jobs.
**1949:**BLS signed cooperative agreements with 48 states for the first time. States began preparing their own estimates.
**1949:**First comprehensive UI-based benchmark was completed and published. Newly expanded UI-based data made it possible to benchmark all employment levels of industry detail directly.
**1954:** Publication of the monthly periodical *Employment and Earnings* began.
**1958:** SIC was adopted for all industry series published by BLS. Benchmarks by size became available, allowing for size class stratification of the sample.
**1962:** The President’s Commission to Appraise Employment and Unemployment Statistics (also known as the Gordon Committee) was created by President John F. Kennedy following charges of political manipulation in a Reader’s Digest article. The commission’s report, “Measuring Employment and Unemployment,” dismissed all charges of political manipulation. It recommended improvements in benchmark data, improved sampling techniques, and publication of estimates of standard error.
**1964:**A major redesign of the CES sampling method was issued as a technical memorandum to the cooperating state workforce agencies (SWAs). It was the first attempt to put a structure and set of requirements around the CES sample needed for national estimates. Sampling requirements were in the form of sampling ratios by industry and size class. The requirements were designed to approximate a sampling proportional to size design but did not constitute a probability sample.
**1964:** CES started collection of women workers and hours and earnings for production and nonsupervisory workers in all private-sector industries.
**1965:** Employment, hours, and earnings series were published monthly for the nation, states, the District of Columbia., and 170 metropolitan areas.
**1966:** Implementation of the 1964 sample design was completed.
**1966:** The difference link and taper became the standard estimator for hours and earnings.
**1967:** First publication of average earnings at the total private level was issued. This was made possible by a sample expansion begun in 1964 in nonmanufacturing industries.
**1968**: Bias adjustment factors to account for business births not captured by the sample was started.
**1975**: Sample increased to 160,000 establishments.
**1978:** CES series were converted from the 1967 SIC to the 1972 SIC with some limited historical reconstruction.
**1978:** A significant expansion of UI coverage to most of state and local government caused a large benchmark revision but improved employment series for these industries.
**1979:**The National Commission on Employment and Unemployment Statistics (also known as the Levitan Committee) issued its report “Counting the Labor Force” with recommendations for many employment and unemployment statistics programs. For the CES, it criticized the sample design and other statistical underpinnings of the program but urged caution in making changes that might disrupt the time series and other series that used CES as an input. It cited inadequate sample size, lack of quality control, lack of a consistent annual benchmarking process, weak bias factor adjustment techniques, and poor documentation as primary concerns. It recommended expanded publication in the service sector industries, expansion of publication to include all MSAs, addition of supplements, collection of hours worked data, and collection of data on part-time workers.
**1980:**CES-SA began publishing over 24,000 state and metropolitan series on LABSTAT.
**1982:** CES-N began the practice of benchmarking every year to a UI-based benchmark. Prior to 1982, benchmarking was not done consistently every year, mainly due to delays in UI data processing. This accomplishment fulfilled one of the Levitan Committee recommendations.
**1982:** Cooperative agreements were signed with all 50 states, the District of Columbia., Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
**1983:**BLS was given full financial responsibility for the labor market information system; UI trust fund money was transferred from the Employment and Training Administration (ETA), and BLS became responsible for administering LMI grants to state workforce agencies for BLS programs. Previously states had received some of their CES program funding directly from BLS, and the remainder of their CES funding from ETA. This transfer of funding for all BLS federal-state programs was a specific recommendation of the Levitan Committee.
**1983:** Sample increased to 190,000 establishments.
**1984:**CES addressed some of the Levitan Committee recommendations by expanding the sample size, issuing a comprehensive revision to the state operations manual and improving training for state and regional staff. In addition, CES began experimenting with a new data collection method, computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI), as a precursor to a probability sample redesign, which would require better solicitation and collection methods.
**1985–93:**A comprehensive CES-SA processing system known as Automated Current Employment System (ACES) was developed by the Iowa state work agency and gradually exported to all states.
**1986:** CES began touchtone data entry (TDE) sample collection for selected reporters.
**1988:** CES tested voice recognition (VR) as a sample collection method for selected reporters. It did not prove feasible and was stopped after the test period.
**1989:** Sample increased to 425,000 establishments covering nearly one-third of universe employment.
**1990:** CES converted estimates from the 1972 SIC to the 1987 SIC basis including extensive historical reconstruction work.
**1991–96:**CES received additional permanent funding through the federal economic indicators (FEI) initiative. It was used to fund conversion to automated data collection techniques and expand the sample size and publication detail in the service-producing sector.
**1993:**Statewide employment series first published on a seasonally adjusted basis.
**1993:** The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) conducted a review of the CES and Quarterly Census of Wages of Employment and Wages (QCEW) programs after charges of political manipulation followed an unusually large 1991 benchmark revision at the national level and in many states—most notably California. The focus was on CES series as an input to the gross domestic product estimates. GAO issued a report titled “Gross Domestic Product: No evidence of manipulation in first quarter 1991 estimates” dismissing the charges.
**1993:** CES undertook an extensive Response Analysis Survey (RAS) of CES and QCEW microdata reporting via payroll processing firms, payroll software providers, and individual respondents. This survey was a follow-up from the large 1991 benchmark revision that had been traced to reporting problems by payroll processing firms. The RAS identified minor issues in reporting in both the CES and QCEW.
**1994:** The two-step seasonal adjustment procedure was adopted to control for the effects of differing seasonal patterns between current monthly sample-based estimates and final benchmarked employment series.
**1994:** CES began collecting sample data via electronic data interchange (EDI) for selected large firms which had large number of worksites.
**1994:** A special panel of the American Statistical Association, requested by BLS, issued its report titled “A research agenda to guide and improve the CES program,” with 26 comprehensive recommendations for CES and ES-202 (now known as QCEW) program improvement. The genesis of the review was an unusually large national benchmark revision for 1991.
**1995:**BLS announced a wide-ranging redesign of the CES program based largely on the 1994 American Statistical Association panel’s recommendations. It was conducted in three sequential phases: research, production testing, and implementation.
**1995:** CES began FAX sample data collection for selected reporters.
**1995–97:**As part of the probability sample redesign effort, BLS completed pilot tests of sampling new business births more rapidly, from first-cut UI registration files. Results indicated this was not feasible and efforts were instead focused on modeling for new business births. In addition, BLS worked with experts from outside the Bureau to complete a probability-based sample design and explore alternative estimators. Other outside experts worked with BLS to research improvements to solicitation and collection methods that would help raise survey response rates.
**1996:** CES began sample data collection by email and internet for selected reporters.
**1997:** The sample redesign research phase was completed; BLS began production test phase of the redesign. BLS took over sample solicitation from states and newly selected probability sample units were solicited by the three BLS regional collection centers. Test estimates were produced from the new sample and assessed for benchmark revision and variance properties.
**1997:** Research was conducted to test of the feasibility of estimating federal employment using standard benchmark and sample-based estimators rather than the then-current method of using end-of-month counts from the Office of Personnel Management.
**1997**: ACES service center began operating as the primary estimation system for state and area series. Some states continued to utilize individual state installations of ACES.
**1998:** A pilot test of collecting all employee hours and earnings was completed. Though successful, a decision was made to postpone this initiative until after the CES redesign was complete, to avoid overwhelming the program resources.
**2000–03:** Implementation phase of the redesign began. A new probability-based sample design and resultant estimates began publication on an SIC major division basis with the wholesale trade industry. Mining, construction, and manufacturing followed in 2001, transportation and public utilities, and finance, insurance, and real estate, and retail trade in 2002 and services in 2003. Government was not converted due to the already existing very high sample coverage.
**2000:** CES-SA introduced small domain model (SDM) estimates for state and area level industries with small sample sizes.
**2003:**CES-SA fully implemented the program redesign. Changes included implementation of a probability sample design, introduction of business birth-death modeling, conversion from an SIC to a 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) basis, and the introduction of a new method for estimating federal government employment. Historical time series were reconstructed based on NAICS.
**2005**: CES expanded its geographic coverage to publish all Office of Management and Budget-designated metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) and metropolitan divisions. Previously about three-quarters of the MSAs were published.
**2005:** Following Hurricane Katrina, CES implemented temporary changes to its monthly estimation techniques for national estimates and affected states and metropolitan areas to better capture the full impact from the storm. Prior user notification and full documentation on the changes were provided on the BLS website.
**2006:** BLS began collecting data on all employee payroll and hours.
**2007:**MSA employment series first published on a seasonally adjusted basis.
**2007:**CES began including tips in its payroll definition for the private service-providing industries, excluding education.
**2007:** Nearly all remaining state workforce agencies sample data collection was transferred to BLS.
**2008:** CES-SA began publication of experimental all employee hours and earnings series.
**2008:** CES-SA ceased publication of the 65 smallest metropolitan areas to accommodate a reduction in funding to BLS. Publication of these areas was resumed in 2009.
**2008:**BLS completed an extensive response analysis survey to explore sources of reporting error in the CES and QCEW microdata and their possible contributions to benchmark error and differing seasonal patterns between the two programs. Results contributed to CES decision not to change benchmark methods or frequencies until error sources in the QCEW could be better understood.
**2008:**CES-SA updated data series from NAICS 2002 to NAICS 2007.
**2009:** Adoption of a “top-down” estimation approach, in which state and area employment is estimated at the super sector level and is used to control the sum of detailed industry estimates, following large differences between sum-of-state and national employment during the 2007–09 recession. The top-down approach included a robust estimation process to reduce the weight of highly influential reports and a Fay-Herriot (FH) model for statewide super sectors with small sample size.
**2009–11:** Introduction of ACES web and transition away from ACES mainframe system for producing state and area estimates
**2010:** CES-SA began publication of official all employee hours and earnings.****
**2011:** CES-SA introduced a special seasonal adjustment technique to control for the variation in intervals between surveys (also known as the 4- versus 5-week effect).
**2011:**Responsibility for producing state and area employment estimates was transferred from state workforce agencies to BLS to reduce costs and standardize estimation methodology.
**2011:** CES began updating the business birth-death model on a quarterly basis rather than the previous procedure of annual updates.
**2012:** CES-SA converted to NAICS 2012 which resulted to minor content changes within the manufacturing and the retail trade sectors, as well as minor coding changes within the utilities and the leisure and hospitality sectors. Several industry titles and descriptions were also updated.
**2013:**CES-SA introduced a modified Fay-Herriot (MFH) model for estimating employment in select metropolitan areas with small sample sizes.
**2014:**CES changed from annual to quarterly sample rotation to improve response rates and estimates by more quickly phasing in newly solicited sample.
**2014:** CES completed the implementation of a probability sample redesign for all private industries in Puerto Rico.
**2015:** CES-SA transitioned from using X‐12‐ARIMA to X‐13ARIMA‐SEATS to produce seasonally adjusted series and forecasts of birth-death residuals.
**2017:**Introduction of generalized variance functions (GVF) to estimate sampling variance
**2018:** CES-SA adopted concurrent seasonal adjustment.
**2018:**CES-SA updated data series to reflect changes from the 2012 NAICS to 2017 NAICS
**2020–21:**CES-SA implemented temporary adjustments beginning with March 2020 estimates to better capture unprecedented employment changes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. These adjustments were discontinued in October 2021.
**2020:**Diffusion indexes of state and area employment were first published.
**2022:**CES-SA introduced a third-generation small area model (SAM Gen3), replacing existing models (SDM, FH, FH2) used for estimating state and area employment cells with small sample sizes.
**2023:** CES-SA updated to NAICS 2022 which resulted in major changes to the retail trade sector codes, as well as minor coding changes within the information and financial services sectors. Several industry titles and descriptions were also updated.

				    Last Modified Date: October 27, 2023 Facebook
 Twitter
 LinkedIn


Home
   Subjects
   Data Tools
   Publications
   Economic Releases
   Classroom
   Beta


**U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics**
Division of Information and Marketing Services 
PSB Suite 2850 
2 Massachusetts Avenue NE  
Washington, DC 20212-0001 Telephone:1-202-691-5200 Telecommunications Relay Service:7-1-1 www.bls.gov/OPUB Contact Us
 resources  Inspector General (OIG)
								Budget and Performance	
								Department of Labor Grants									
								No Fear Act
								USA.gov
								Vote.gov
 about the site  Sitemap						
								Freedom of Information Act
								Privacy and Security Statement
								Disclaimers
								Linking and Copyright Info	
								Important Website Notices
								Help and Tutorials
								Babel Notice: accessing language services


Twitter Youtube Email


- Publications
- Handbook of Methods