alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 21

                               CRAIG CORPORATION


                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant


Craig Management, Inc., a California corporation, wholly owned by Registrant.

Dimension Specialty Company, a Delaware corporation, owned by Registrant.

James J. Cotter Company & Associates, Inc., a California corporation, wholly
     owned by Registrant.

Craig Food and Hospitality, Inc., a Delaware corporation, wholly-owned by
     Registrant.

Hope Street Hospitality, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 50% owned by
     Registrant.

Reading Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 78% voting ownership by
     Registrant.
Citadel Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, 33.4% direct and indirect
     voting ownership by Registrant.

The subsidiaries omitted from the foregoing list do not, considered in the
     aggregate, constitute a significant subsidiary.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Declan Daly, ExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer of Inamed Corporation (the “Registrant”),do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on myknowledge:

 

(1)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which thiscertification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

Dated:  March 22, 2006

 

/S/ DECLAN DALY

Declan Daly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(PrincipalFinancial and Accounting Officer)

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to InamedCorporation and will be retained by Inamed Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
### Bureau of Labor Statistics U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations Workers in this group tend and harvest renewable resources and manage forests and public parks. Overall employment in farming, fishing, and forestry occupations is projected to decline from 2022 to 2032. However, about 142,000 openings are projected each year, on average, in these occupations due to the need to replace workers who leave the occupations permanently. The median annual wage for this group was $35,520 in May 2023, which was lower than the median annual wage for all occupations of $48,060. BLS employment projections, wage, and other data for related occupations not shown in the following table are available on the Data for Occupations Not Covered in Detail page. Information highlighting physical demands, cognitive and mental requirements, and other qualifications for workers in this group are available in a BLS Occupational Requirements Survey (ORS) profile. **Occupation**
                **Job Summary**
                **Entry-Level Education**
                **2022     MEDIAN PAY****Agricultural Workers**
            Agricultural workers maintain crops and tend livestock.
            See How to Become One
            $34,790**Fishing and Hunting Workers**
            Fishing and hunting workers catch and trap various types of animal life.
            No formal educational credential
            The annual wage is not available.**Forest and Conservation Workers**
            Forest and conservation workers perform physical labor to improve the quality of natural areas such as forests, rangelands, and wetlands.
            High school diploma or equivalent
            $33,940**Logging Workers**
            Logging workers harvest forests to provide the raw material for many consumer goods and industrial products.
            High school diploma or equivalent
            $48,910 **Last Modified Date:**
                        Wednesday, April 17, 2024


**U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics**
Office of Occupational Statistics and Employment Projections 
PSB Suite 2135 
2 Massachusetts Avenue NE  
Washington, DC 20212-0001 Telephone:1-202-691-5700 

www.bls.gov/ooh
Contact OOH
#### *In re*Treadwell and others, Bankrupts.

*(District Court, D. California.*

May 16, 1883.)

Bankruptcy—Compensation of Attorney of Assignee.

As the attorney of .the assignee appears to have saved to the estate $30,000, after protracted litigation, *held,*that $5,000 should he allowed as a fair and reasonable compensation for such services as had been rendered and as should he required as incidental to the final closing up of the estate.

In Bankruptcy.

*Lloyd Baldwin, in propria persona.*

*T. Z. Blakeman,*for opposing creditors.

Hoffman, J.

Considering that by the efforts of the attorney for the assignee the sum of $30,000 was saved to the estate after a protracted litigation in this court, and in the circuit court on appeal.

2. That more than half the creditors have expressly in writing assented to the allowance to the attorney of $5,500; that creditors to the amount of $99,175, who have not signed the assent, were present at the creditors’ meeting, and offered no objection to the allowance, and do not now object to the same, and the creditors who now except represent only one.-eleventh of the total amount of unsecured debts, viz., $368,854.61.

3. That the attorney for the objecting creditors proposed at the beginning of the litigation to compromise the same by paying $5,000 in satisfaction of the claim of $30,000, which offer was declined by the claimants, and that by the final decree of the court the whole claim has been rejected.

4. That the claim, if allowed, would have absorbed the whole as- *443' sets of the estate tlien remaining undisturbed in the hands of the assignee ; and that the services of the attorney in resisting and finally defeating the claim wore rendered with no certain assurance of compensation; and that such compensation was practically contingent on the result of the suit.

5. That the claim of Amos Eauke against the estate for $27,000 was defeated after argument and reargument on demurrer; and that other claims were presented, in opposing which the services of the attorney in opposition to them were necessary and wore rendered.

6. That numerous attendances in court, consultations with the assignee, communications, oral and in writing, with creditors occurred, which must necessarily have occupied a considerable portion of the attorney’s time, and for which ho is entitled' to compensation.

In view of the foregoing, I allow the sum of $5,000 as being in my judgment a fair and reasonable compensation for the services of the attorney rendered since March, 1881. I have reduced his claim by $250 on the grounds (1) that the fees claimed for preparing the petition, orders, etc., for a sale of remaining assets of the estate, amounting to $364, is in my opinion excessive; (2) that I am doubtful whether the assignee can charge against the estate any sum for fees paid to his attorney for drawing a bond which by order of the court he was required to give.

It is understood that the sum hereby allowed includes compensation for services, if any, which may hereafter be rendered by the attorney incidental to the final closing up of the estate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-663 (Fourth Review)]

## Determination

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on paper clips from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

                    The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted this review on June 1, 2016 (81 FR 35052) and determined on September 6, 2016 that it would conduct a full review (82 FR 13132, March 9, 2017). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's review and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 9, 2017 (82 FR 13132). The hearing was cancelled on June 8, 2017 at the request of the domestic interested parties (82 FR 27285, June 14, 2017).                

                    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on August 24, 2017. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4719 (August 2017), entitled                     *Paper Clips from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-663 (Fourth Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: August 24, 2017.

Katherine M. Hiner,

Supervisory Attorney.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2017-18357 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Raymond M. Trewhella, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of GlassmasterCompany;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and   c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    Dated:     June 13, 2006       /s/ Raymond M. Trewhella     Raymond M. Trewhella
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         5,086,087
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                124,731,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                  28,404,930
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             101,413,090
<PP&E>                                         1,205,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                    75,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               116,936,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                      132,764,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                   12,096,144
<COMMON>                                           1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (28,904,570)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           0
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,825,731
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,008,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              17,773,892
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,230,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (19,186,560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (19,373,361)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (9.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.43

    


    AMENDMENT
NUMBER THREE TO

    EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT

    


    This
Amendment Number Three is made as of December 30, 2008, to the Employment
Agreement dated as of April 16, 2007 (the “Agreement”), by and between Southern
Community Bank and Trust and Southern Community Financial Corporation and James
C. Monroe (“Officer”).

    


    1.  The
Agreement is amended by adding the following Paragraph:

    


    “15.      Compliance
with ESSA. To the extent that any payment under this Agreement would
constitute a prohibited parachute payment under Section 111(b)(2)(C) of the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”), the Bank agrees to pay
Officer an additional payment equal to the prohibited payment on July 1, 2012,
or if later, the earliest date when Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA no longer
prohibits such payment.  Such payment shall be made in a single lump
sum in cash, without interest.  The Officer may be entitled to
severance payments from multiple agreements and plans with the
Bank.  The Bank, it its sole discretion, shall determine which
payments shall be delayed in order to comply with
ESSA.   Notwithstanding anything in this paragraph to the
contrary, the additional amounts due under the Agreement shall not be paid if
the Treasury Department or other governmental agency issues guidance subsequent
to the date of this Agreement that would prohibit such payment.  A
prohibited parachute payment shall be interpreted in a manner that is consistent
with Notice 2008-TAAP, Notice 2008-94 and all other current or future guidance
issued  pursuant to Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA or Section 280G(e) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.”

    


    2.  No
other terms and conditions of the Agreement are affected by this
Amendment.

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written
above.

    


    
      
        	
                SOUTHERN
      COMMUNITY BANK AND TRUST

              
	 
      
	
                By:

              	
                /s/ Jeff T. Clark

              
	 
      	
                Jeff
      T. Clark, President

              
	 
      


      

    

    
      
        	
                OFFICER

              
	 
      
	
                 /s/ James C. Monroe

              	
                (SEAL)

              
	
                James
      C. Monroe
#### DUMAS v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

Civ. A. No. 26586.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

July 6, 1951.

Elmer I. Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Wm. A. Blank, Brooklyn, N. Y., G. H. P. Lacey, L. L. To well, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

JONES, Chief Judge.

An inaccurate statement in the court’s memorandum of June 29, 1951 having been brought to its attention, the following substituted memorandum is filed in the action but no change in the judgment is required.

This is a personal injury action. Plaintiff moves the court for an order requiring the defendant to produce for inspection and copying all written medical reports to defendant concerning the physical condition of plaintiff.

Plaintiff shows the following as good cause for the requested order: In March of 1951, at the request of defendant, he voluntarily submitted to a physical examination by Dr. Wallace S. Duncan and to X-rays under Dr. Duncan’s order. Since then, his attorney has requested-permission of defendant’s attorney to examine or copy the reports of Dr. Duncan, but defendant’s attorney has refused to grant the request. Furthermore, although denied access to defendant’s medical evidence, plaintiff’s attorney has voluntarily provided defendant and its attorney with copies of medical reports in his possession.

Clearly, plaintiff is entitled to a copy of the medical reports of Dr. Duncan under Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. Rule 35 (b) (1), 28 U.S.C.A. See Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d Edition, Section 35.06, and the cases there cited. It is equally clear that medical reports to attorneys are not privileged under the concept of “attorney-client” privilege developed in Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S.Ct. 385, 91 L.Ed. 451. Moore’s Federal Practice, id., Section 26.24.

Aside from any rights plaintiff may have under Rule 35(b) (1), his full disclosure of his medical evidence entitles him to favorable action on the motion under Rule 34. Motion granted.
(logo) Prudential 

**                                                                                                                                       **Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.

 

Prudential Mortgage Capital Company

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500 Dallas, TX 75201

Tel 877-937-4500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Attn: Commercial Mtg Servicing

MAC D1086-120

550 South Tryon Street,14th Floor

Charlotte, NC 28202

 

 

 

RE:        Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through, WFRBS 2013-C13

Period:   January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period") 

Annual Compliance Statement

I, Hal Collett, in my capacity as President and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement") dated as of May 1, 2013 pertaining to the above-referenced certificates, that:

 

 

(i)            a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the Reporting Period, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii)           to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled  all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

 

Effective as of February 24, 2015

 

 

 

/s/ Hal Collett

Hal Collett

President and Managing Director

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 520 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 520

To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reauthorize 
                                the Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2015

  Mr. Cardin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reauthorize 
                                the Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION 
              ACT.

    Section 10 of the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 6109) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 10. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``(a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act $6,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2020.
    ``(b) Use of Funds.--Of the amounts made available under subsection 
(a) for each fiscal year, not less than 75 percent shall be expended 
for projects carried out at a location outside of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```