alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2021_12_14_14_47" style="width: 95%;"><caption><span class="tableTitle">Chart 9b. First-quarter private sector employment in high-paying establishments, as a percentage of total employment, 1993–2020</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; min-width: 80px;" rowspan="1" scope="col">Year</th>
<th scope="col">Percent of total</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>1993</p>
</th>
<td>37.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>1994</p>
</th>
<td>37.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>1995</p>
</th>
<td>37.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>1996</p>
</th>
<td>36.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>1997</p>
</th>
<td>36.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>1998</p>
</th>
<td>35.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>1999</p>
</th>
<td>34.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2000</p>
</th>
<td>34.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2001</p>
</th>
<td>34.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2002</p>
</th>
<td>34.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2003</p>
</th>
<td>34.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2004</p>
</th>
<td>34.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2005</p>
</th>
<td>34.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2006</p>
</th>
<td>34.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2007</p>
</th>
<td>34.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2008</p>
</th>
<td>34.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2009</p>
</th>
<td>34.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2010</p>
</th>
<td>33.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2011</p>
</th>
<td>34.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2012</p>
</th>
<td>35.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2013</p>
</th>
<td>34.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2014</p>
</th>
<td>34.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2015</p>
</th>
<td>33.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2016</p>
</th>
<td>33.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2017</p>
</th>
<td>33.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2018</p>
</th>
<td>33.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>2019</p>
</th>
<td>33.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>2020</p>
</th>
<td>33.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2021_12_14_14_47_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="2">
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p></p>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

E RIC MELENDEZ , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2667 L T Case No. 1992

- CF

- 1831

- A S TATE OF FLORIDA , A ppellee

.

_

_______________________________/ O pinion filed May 19, 2023 Appeal f rom t he Circuit Court for Seminole County , Donna G oerner , Judge. Andrew B. Greenlee , o f A ndrew B. Greenlee, P .A., S anford, for Appellant. Eric Melendez, Lowell, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee

.
PER CURIAM

. Due t o A ppellant’s apparent a buse o f t he legal p rocess by h is abusive, repetitive, m alicious, or f rivolous pro se filings a ttacking h is j udgment a nd2

sentence in Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 1992 -C F -1 83 1-A, this Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Appellant through counsel has stipulated to being prohibited from future filings unless represented by counsel. In order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 1992

- CF -1 831 -A. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. The Clerk will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State , 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020) ; Simpkins v. State , 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

S ANCTIONS IMPOSED.

L AMBERT, C.J., EDWARDS and SOUD , JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 479 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 479

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 
     Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2015

 Mrs. Fischer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 
     Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY 
              STUDY.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(46) Chief standing bear national historic trail.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Chief Standing Bear Trail, 
                extending approximately 550 miles from Niobrara, 
                Nebraska, to Ponca City, Oklahoma, which follows the 
                route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca people 
                during Federal Indian removal, and approximately 550 
                miles from Ponca City, Oklahoma, through Omaha, 
                Nebraska, to Niobrara, Nebraska, which follows the 
                return route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca 
                people, as generally depicted on the map entitled 
                `Chief Standing Bear National Historic Trail 
                Feasibility Study', numbered 903/125,630, and dated 
                November 2014.
                    ``(B) Availability of map.--The map described in 
                subparagraph (A) shall be on file and available for 
                public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 
                Department of the Interior.
                    ``(C) Components.--The feasibility study conducted 
                under subparagraph (A) shall include a determination on 
                whether the Chief Standing Bear Trail meets the 
                criteria described in subsection (b) for designation as 
                a national historic trail.
                    ``(D) Considerations.--In conducting the 
                feasibility study under subparagraph (A), the Secretary 
                of the Interior shall consider input from owners of 
                private land within or adjacent to the study area.''.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 08, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 08, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0405. NANCY GASTEL v. DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 18CV10479
----

|   | Provisional      Product Pricing – SOPUS will pay Frontier the mean of the prior      week’s weekly average low and high price for Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel #1      published by Platte’s Oil Service for Group 3, FOB the custody transfer      point, plus 0.15 cents per gallon. The previous week’s mean shall be      calculated as the arithmetic average of the Platt’s effective low and high      quotes for Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel #1s for Monday through Friday of the      previous week and shall be effective for delivers from Tuesday of the      current week through Monday of the nextweek. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,826,028
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  552,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    136,693
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,725,729
<PP&E>                                       3,258,437
<DEPRECIATION>                                 826,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,196,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          931,199
<BONDS>                                        236,032
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,888
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,800,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,196,809
<SALES>                                      2,080,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,247,975
<CGS>                                        1,288,698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,288,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               857,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,079
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,385
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
<FN>
Accounts receivable are net of allowance of $133,000 at June 30, 1997.



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENTS

 

 

 

    We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-56918 and 333-88525 on Form S-3, and 333-63101,333-71990, 333-71992, 333-81134 and 333-93193 on Form S-8 of WPS ResourcesCorporation, of our report dated January 29, 2003, appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of WPS Resources Corporation for the year ended December 31,2002.

    We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-97053 of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation onForm S-3, of our report dated January 29, 2003, appearing in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation for the year endedDecember 31, 2002.

 

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

March 7, 2003
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 730 

To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2015 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Ms. WARREN, Mr. REED, Mr. FRANKEN, Ms. 

STABENOW, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at 

Foreclosure Act of 2009. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanently Pro5 tecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF THE PROTECTING TENANTS AT 

7 FORECLOSURE ACT OF 2009. 

8 (a) REPEAL OF SUNSET PROVISION.—Section 704 of 

9 the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 (12 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 730 RFS

1 U.S.C. 5201 note; 12 U.S.C. 5220 note; 42 U.S.C. 1437f 

2 note) is repealed. 

3 (b) RESTORATION.—Sections 701 through 703 of 

4 such Act, the provisions of law amended or repealed by 

5 such sections, and any regulations promulgated pursuant 

6 to such sections, as were in effect on December 31, 2014, 

7 are restored and revived as if the sunset provision in sec8 tion 704 had not taken effect. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 618 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 618

 To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to the powers of 
              the Department of Justice Inspector General.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2015

  Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Tester, Mr. Grassley, and Ms. Murkowski) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to the powers of 
              the Department of Justice Inspector General.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Inspector General Access Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. INVESTIGATIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PERSONNEL.

    Section 8E of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and paragraph 
                (3)'';
                    (B) by striking paragraph (3);
                    (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 
                paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and
                    (D) in paragraph (4), as redesignated, by striking 
                ``paragraph (4)'' and inserting ``paragraph (3)''; and
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``, except with respect 
        to allegations described in subsection (b)(3),''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the use of our reports dated March 4, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Talisman Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Talisman Energy Inc., included in an exhibit to the Annual Report
(Form 40-F) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-12812) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan
and Director Stock Option Plan of Talisman Energy Inc. and (ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-154924) pertaining to the Corporate
Strategy Implementation Recognition Program of Talisman Energy Inc. of our reports dated March 4, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Talisman
Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
Talisman Energy Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 40-F) of Talisman Energy Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the shelf Registration Statement (Form F-9 No. 333-150058) of our report dated March 4, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Talisman Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, included in the Annual Report
(Form 40-F) of Talisman Energy Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

GRAPHIC

Calgary,
Canada
March 9, 2009

1

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David E. Struble, Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 628]

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 *et seq.),*defendant contends that County Court’s assessment of 15 points each for risk factors 9 and 11 set forth in the risk assessment instrument is not supported by clear and convincing evidence *(see*§ 168-n [3]). We reject those contentions. With respect to risk factor 9, concerning the number and nature of prior crimes, defendant contends that his Texas felony conviction should not be considered a *1349felony under SORA because it does not qualify as a predicate felony for sentencing purposes in New York *(see*Penal Law § 70.06 [1] [b] [i]; *People v Muniz,*74 NY2d 464, 471 [1989]). As the court properly concluded, Correction Law § 168-Z (5) (b) (iii) does not incorporate the definition of a second felony offender set forth in Penal Law § 70.06 (1) (b) (i) in the criteria for determining whether a felony committed in another jurisdiction is a felony with respect to risk factor 9.

Risk factor 11 concerns drug or alcohol abuse, and defendant admitted that he was arrested between 30 and 40 times in Texas for drug and alcohol related offenses and could not remember 14 years of his life because of his drug and alcohol abuse. Indeed, defendant has not shown successful completion of any treatment program, nor has he shown that he attended Alcoholics Anonymous meetings *(cf. People v Wilbert,*35 AD3d 1220 [2006]). We thus conclude that the court’s assessment of points for risk factors 9 and 11, respectively, is supported by the requisite clear and convincing evidence. Present—Martoche, J.P., Smith, Peradotto, Pine and Gorski, JJ. *[See*14 Misc 3d 1201(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 52377(U).]
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 12

- 01090

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 1137680

Style: Eugene V. McMahon

v Marcia Zimmerman, Individually, and the Zimmerman Law Firm, LLP

Date motion filed * : 8/14/2013

Type of motion : Appellants's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Refile Brief to Cure Procedural

Defects in Civil Case

Party filing motion: Eugene McMahon

Document to be filed: Appellant's amended brief

Is appeal accelera ted? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: 8/13/2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 1

Date Requested: No specific date requested

- instead reques ted "sufficient time" to

allow filing of supplemental Clerk's Record and amend brief.

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: File amended brief by October 2, 2013 or 10 days after

s upplemental record is received, whichever is sooner.

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

Judge's signature: /s/ Harve y Brown

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: September 6, 2013
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Donald P. Gill, hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First Ipswich
Bancorp;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
we have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
      including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
      within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
      quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our
      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
      procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report
      based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business
      issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
      the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
      issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the
equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
      to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
      internal controls over financial reporting.


/s/ Donald P. Gill
-----------------------
Donald P. Gill
Chief Executive Officer

November 15, 2004