alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013, by and among RBS COMMERCIAL FUNDING INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as Co-op Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC., as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2013-C13 (the "Agreement" ). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1 .        A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period” ), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2 .        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015. 

 

 

 

                   /s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice P r esident

Wells Fa rgo Bank 

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
<table class="regular" id="BLStable_2023_10_24_10_40" style="width: 95%;"><caption> <span class="tableTitle">Chart 8. Percentage of employed who were involuntary part-time workers, American Indians and Alaska Natives and the total population, averages for the combined years 2019–21</span></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="vertical-align: middle; min-width: 80px;" rowspan="1" scope="col">Category</th>
<th scope="col">Percent</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>Total American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN)</p>
</th>
<td>4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>AIANs residing in AIAN area</p>
</th>
<td>4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">
<p>AIANs not residing in AIAN area</p>
</th>
<td>5.1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="greenbar">
<th scope="row">
<p>Total population</p>
</th>
<td>3.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot id="BLStable_2023_10_24_10_40_footnotes" style="display: table-footer-group;">
<tr class="footnotes">
<td class="footnotes" colspan="2">
<p>Note: American Indian and Alaska Native areas include federal American Indian reservations and off-reservation trust lands, joint-use federal American Indian reservations, Oklahoma tribal statistical areas, joint-use tribal statistical areas, Alaska Native village statistical areas, tribal-designated statistical areas, state American Indian reservations, and state-designated tribal statistical areas.</p>
<p>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p></p>
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 5- 17 67

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ St ep he n Wayne Norwo od

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Jo hn Fo x, In te rim W ard en , FCI - Fo rres t Ci ty
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s - Hel en a

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Decem

be r 23 , 20 15 Fi le d: Jan ua ry

7, 2 01 6 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, BOW MAN, an d C OLLOTO N, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Fed eral in m at e St ep he n Nor woo d ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s de ni al of hi s 28 1 U.S.C. § 22 41 pe ti ti on in whi ch he so ug ht pr io r-cu st od y cred it to ward s se rv ic e of hi s fed eral se nt en ce. Upo n care fu l de no vo rev ie w, s ee Abd ul la h v . Hedr ic k, 3 92 F.3d 95 7, 95 9 (8t h Cir. 20 04 ), we co nc lu de th at Norwo od was n ot en ti tl ed to rel ie f. It is

un di sp ut ed th at th e en ti re ti m e pe rio d a t i s su e was cred it ed ag ai ns t a st at e se nt en ce th at he was se rv in g (n ot wit hs ta nd in g hi s co nt en ti on th at th e s t a t e lo st “ pr im ary”

cu st od y ov er hi m at so m e po in t). Thu s, th e ti m e was no t el ig ib le fo r c r e d i t a g ai ns t hi s fe de ral se nt en ce. See 18 U.S.C. § 35 85 (b ); Elwel l v. Fi sh er, 71 6 F.3 d 4 77 , 48 1 (8 th Cir . 20 13 ).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Kris ti ne G. Bak er, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e East ern 1 Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco m m en da t i o n s of th e Hon or ab le Je ro m e T. Kearn ey , Uni te d St at es Mag is t r a t e Ju dg e fo r th e East ern Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s. -2

-
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Allen Lamberg, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Quality 1st Maintenance, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Law Office of Mark E. Nadjar, P.C. (Mark E. Nadjar, Esq.), for appellant.Quality 1st Maintenance, Oscar Berrios, owner.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Suffolk County, Fourth District (James F. Matthews, J.), entered January 28, 2016. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover the sum of $5,000 for defendant's allegedly defective workmanship in repairing the stone entrance area and patio of plaintiff's house. After a nonjury trial, the District Court dismissed the action.</p><p>In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (UDCA 1807; <i>see</i> UDCA 1804; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000]). Furthermore, the determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (<i>see Vizzari v State of New York</i>, 184 AD2d 564 [1992]; <i>Kincade v Kincade</i>, 178 AD2d 510, 511 [1991]). This deference applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (<i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126). We find that the record supports the District Court's determination and, thus, the parties were provided with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (<i>see</i> UDCA 1804, 1807).</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.</p><p>MARANO, P.J., TOLBERT and GARGUILO, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: November 16, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended May 31, 2005 of Arrow International, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl G. Anderson, Jr., the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge and based upon a review of the Report, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented as
          required by such Report.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, my own due diligence and representations
made by certain others of the Company's senior management.

                                     /s/ Carl G. Anderson, Jr.
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Carl G. Anderson, Jr.
                                    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)

                                    July 11, 2005


                                       41
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group; Neuroscience of Aging Review Committee.
    Date: October 5-6, 2017.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Greg Bissonette, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 
Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-402-1622, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bf9f2e8e8f4f5feefeffefcf9dbf6faf2f7b5f5f2f3b5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81e3e8f2f2eeefe4f5f5e4e6e3c1ece0e8edafefe8e9afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: August 23, 2017.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-18198 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 28 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk June 2 8 , 2019

158716 (74)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 158716

v COA: 334205

Wayne CC: 16

- 003006

- FH

GARY GILMORE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the time

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted

as timely filed if submitted on or before August 16, 2019.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7010

WILBER LEE BARKER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE DEEDS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-1488-AM)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 10, 1998

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilber Lee Barker, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Barker v. Deeds, No. CA-96-1488-AM (E.D. Va.

June 9, 1998). In addition, issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be reviewed. See Satterfield v. Zahradnick, 572 F.2d

443, 446 (4th Cir. 1978). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Zachary Aaron Noel, * From the 29th District Court

 of Palo Pinto County,

 Trial Court No. 16199.

Vs. No. 11-18-00087-CR * August 9, 2018

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

 Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

 sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal 

is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17892]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy And Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel NIAID Peer Review Meeting.
    Date: September 18-19, 2017.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: The William F. Bolger Center, 9600 Newbridge Drive, 
Potomac, MD 20854.
    Contact Person: Julio Aliberti, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 5601 Fishers 
Lane, MSC-9823, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-761-7322, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c4d40454e495e5845464f6c42454d454802424544024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82e3eeebe0e7f0f6ebe8e1c2ecebe3ebe6acecebeaace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel NIAID Investigator Initiated Program 
Project Applications (P01).
    Date: September 27, 2017.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Raymond R. Schleef, Ph.D., Senior Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, Room 3E61, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 
Fishers Lane, MSC 9823, Bethesda, MD 20892-9823, (240) 669-5019, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5625353e3a333330242416383f373f3278383f3e78313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cab9a9a2a6afafacb8b88aa4a3aba3aee4a4a3a2e4ada5bc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 18, 2017.
Natasha Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-17892 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 388 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 388

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to require humane treatment of animals 
                   by Federal Government facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 5, 2015

 Mr. Booker (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Schatz, and Mr. Durbin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Animal Welfare Act to require humane treatment of animals 
                   by Federal Government facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Animal Welfare in Agricultural 
Research Endeavors Act'' or the ``AWARE Act''.

SEC. 2. ANIMAL WELFARE.

    Section 14 of the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2144) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``Any'' and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (3), any Federal 
        research facility or any other'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Any'' and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(2) Animal exhibition.--Any''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Exclusions not applicable.--For purposes of the 
        application of standards and other requirements described in 
        paragraph (1) to a Federal research facility or any other 
        department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States 
        having laboratory animal facilities, the exclusions contained 
        in section 2(g)(3) shall not apply.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Blair, Trustee, *v.*St. Louis, H. & K. R. Co. and others. (Norton, Intervenor.1)

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri.*

March 19, 1885.)

Reoeivers—Ante-Receiversiop Debts—Surety on Appeal-Bond.

Whero a judgment is recovered against a railroad company in an inferior court upon a, claim not entitled to priority, and an appeal is taken, and the company’s attorney goes on the appeal bond, and a receiver of the road is thereafter appointed, and after his appointment a judgment is recovered in the appellate court against the company and the attorney, and the latter pays it, his claim is entitled to no priority over that of mortgage bondholders.

In Equity. Exceptions to master’s report.

It appears that the intervenor paid the judgment referred to in the opinion of the court.

*Tkeo. G. Case,*for complainant.

*John O’Grady,*for receiver.

*James Carr,*for intervenor.

1

 Reported by Benj. F. Rex, Esq., of the St. Louis bar.

Brewer, J., *{orally.)*

The other case of *Norton*against *The Same Road*presents a different state of facts.2 There, the same gentleman, who was attorney for the road, at the instance of the president, went surety on appeal-bonds. Cases wore pending before a justice of the peace in the latter part of 1873, a few months before the appointment of the receiver, and after judgment there the company appealed, and he signed the appeal-bonds. The cases went to the circuit court of the state, and on trial there, after the receiver’s appointment, judgments were rendered against the company, and against him.

Well, not one of the claims sued on before the justice would be entitled to priority. They date back two or three years before the appointment of the receiver, and it would bo strange if, when the claims in the first instance were not of a character entitled to priority over a secured and registered indebtedness, that an attorney of the road could, by simply giving his services as surety on appeal-bonds, indirectly secure the payment of those claims in priority to the mortgage debts. We think the ruling of the master in that was correct, and the exception will be overruled.

2

 gee other case of same title, which, was decided immediately before this one.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000885394
<NAME> TMP INLAND EMPIRE II, LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           28035
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    3656304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3684339
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3684339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            91772
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3592567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3684339
<SALES>                                            585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   585
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   677
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (92)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (92)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (92)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>