alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1




1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2013-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
   
 
  
 /s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the annual report of Talisman Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Manzoni, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|By: | /s/JOHN A. MANZONI                    |  | 
|--- | ------------------------------------- |  | 
|    | John A. Manzoni                       |  | 
|    | President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

DATEDat Calgary, Alberta, as of March 7, 2008.

1

---



CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the annual report of Talisman Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip D. Dolan, Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|By: | /s/PHILIP D. DOLAN                                  |  | 
|--- | --------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|    | Philip D. Dolan                                     |  | 
|    | Vice-President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer |  | 

DATEDat Calgary, Alberta, as of March 7, 2008.

2

---



QuickLinks
# JAN 08  0859AM

CDR420

Line-In Record

Other

769.6791
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 68 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 68

   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make voting in a 
 Federal election by an unlawfully present alien an aggravated felony 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 7, 2015

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make voting in a 
 Federal election by an unlawfully present alien an aggravated felony 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voter Integrity Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. UNLAWFUL VOTING.

    (a) Aggravated Felony.--Paragraph (43) of section 101(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (T), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (U), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting a semicolon and ``and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(V) an offense described in section 611 of title 
                18, United States Code, committed by an alien who is 
                unlawfully present in the United States.''.
    (b) Deportable Offense.--Paragraph (2) of section 237(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
                    ``(G) Voting offenses.--Any alien who is unlawfully 
                present in the United States and who knowingly commits 
                a violation of section 611 of title 18, United States 
                Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Edward A. Machulak, Executive Vice President and Secretary of Commerce
Group Corp., (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year
     ended March 31, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities
     and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.

Date:  June 27, 2006                 /s/ Edward A. Machulak
                                    -----------------------
                                    Edward A. Machulak
                                    Executive Vice President,
                                    and Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                              NATURAL WONDERS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE NET LOSS
                                 (In thousands)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Quarter Ended
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  October 28,      October 30,
                                                      2000            1999
                                                  -----------      -----------
<S>                                               <C>              <C>
     Net loss                                      $(4,856)         $(3,884)
                                                   =======          =======

     Weighted average common shares
            outstanding, basic and diluted           7,860            7,865

     Per share net loss, basic and diluted         $ (0.62)         $ (0.49)
                                                   =======          =======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Michael Falvey, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aspect Medical Systems, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting .Dated: November 8, 2007           /s/ Michael Falvey   Michael Falvey   *Chief Financial Officer*
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 69 

To require that the Government give priority to payment of all obligations 

on the debt held by the public and payment of Social Security benefits 

in the event that the debt limit is reached. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2015 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require that the Government give priority to payment 

of all obligations on the debt held by the public and 

payment of Social Security benefits in the event that 

the debt limit is reached. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRIORITIZE OBLIGATIONS ON THE DEBT HELD 

4 BY THE PUBLIC AND PAYMENT OF SOCIAL SE5 CURITY BENEFITS. 

6 In the event that the debt of the United States Gov7 ernment, as defined in section 3101 of title 31, United 

8 States Code, reaches the statutory limit, the authority of 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 69 IS

1 the Department of the Treasury provided in section 3123 

2 of title 31, United States Code, to pay with legal tender 

3 the principal and interest on debt held by the public and 

4 the authority of the Commissioner of Social Security to 

5 pay monthly old-age, survivors’, and disability insurance 

6 benefits under title II of the Social Security Act shall take 

7 priority over all other obligations incurred by the Govern8 ment of the United States. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit31(a)**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Phillip D. Wright, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northwest Pipeline Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 1, 2007     By: /s/Phillip D. Wright Phillip D. Wright
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20

 
                           CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

                                      OF

                       READING INTERNATIONAL CINEMAS LLC



     This Certificate of Formation of Reading International Cinemas LLC is being
duly executed and filed by James C. Lockwood, as an authorized person, to form a
limited liability company under the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act.


1.   The name of the limited liability company is Reading International Cinemas 
     LLC.

2.   The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is 103
     Springer Building, 3411 Silverside Road, Wilmington, New Castle County,
     Delaware 19810. The name of its registered agent at such address is
     Organization Services, Inc.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of 
Formation this 7th day of November 1995.
               ---


                                            /s/ James C. Lockwood
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James C. Lockwood
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RODNEY WAYNE BARNES, a/k/a C,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00032-NKM-1; 3:13-

cv-80601-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: December 28, 2018 Decided: February 8, 2019

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Wayne Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Rodney Wayne Barnes seeks to appeal the district court’s orders construing his 

postjudgment motions as unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motions and 

dismissing them without prejudice on that basis. On appeal, we confine our review to the 

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Barnes’ informal 

brief does not challenge the district court’s conclusion that his motions were unauthorized 

successive § 2255 motions, Barnes has forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders. 

See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an 

important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved 

in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We deny as

unnecessary a certificate of appealability. See Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 183 

(2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.01

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Commercial Credit Company:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-18208, 33-27241 (and the related offerings of securities registered
under Registration Statement No. 33-10444), 33-28723, 33-35618, 33-39857,
33-43351, 33-51814, 33-50513, 33-56553, 33-59415, 333-00055, 333-13311,
333-28847 and 333-44181) on Form S-3 of Commercial Credit Company of our report
dated January 26, 1998, with respect to the consolidated statement of financial
position of Commercial Credit Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997
and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholder's equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1997 and the related financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K
of Commercial Credit Company.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 23, 1998
# OES only codes

# OES use of combined SOC data
#### Mellon *v.*Smith-Davis Manuf’g Co. and others.

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri.*

March 2, 1885.)

Patents—Metallic Seeing- Beds.

Letters patent !No. 238,703, granted to Peter A. Mellon for an improvement in “metallic spring-beds,” *held*void for want of novelty.

In Equity.

Suit for the infringement of letters patent No. 238,703, granted to Peter H. Mellon for an improvement in metallic spring-beds. The improvement relates, as the specifications state, “to a spring-bed made entirely of metal, and it consists in duplicate iron frames, to which the bottoms and tops of the outer row of the double spiral springs are secured by wire; the inner rows of springs being connected to each other and to the outer row by means of open-wire links.” The inventor claims as his invention “the combination in a spring-bed of the frames, A, A1, braces, D, and double spiral springs, G, connected to each other and to the frames substantially as and for the purpose set forth.”

*W. M.*Eccles, for complainant.

*Finkelnburg, Rassieur & Dexter*Tiffany, for defendants.

1

**Reported by Benj. F. Rex, Esq., of the St. Louis bar.

Treat, J.

The several claims in plaintiff’s patent are for the combinations therein respectively named. As to some of such combinations, obviously there is no infringement. From the state of the art at the.date of said patent, no novelty as to the alleged invention is discernible. The court can detect no exercise of inventive faculty where-from the mechanical arrangements named are patentable, within the purview of the patent law. There is no suggestion in the patent as to adjustability, and indeed the specifications show that the opposite was in the mind of the patentee. Soldering, welding, or the use of reversely screw-threaded couplings would make the connection of the two parts fixedly rigid. Such, also, would be the effect of a collar as in the patent described. The court, therefore, is of the opinion that the patent is void for want of novelty. *Morris*v. *McMillin,*5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 218.

Bill dismissed, with costs.
#### BOGAR v. SZENTMIKLOSY.

Civil Action No. 3051.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

Jan. 23, 1945.

A. H. Friedman and Prichard, Lawler, Malone & Geltz, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Joseph H. Reich, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

McVICAR, District Judge.

This is an action to recover damages for alleged slander. Jurisdiction is invoked on the basis of diversity of citizenship. It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff is a citizen of the City of Mc-Keesport, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; that the defendant is a citizen of the State of New York. Service was made on the defendant in the State of New Jersey. The action is now before us on defendant’s motion to quash the service of summons and complaint, on the ground that the service was not authorized by law, being made in the State of New Jersey.

Defendant, in his argument, relies upon Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rules 4 (f), 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Rule 4(f) provides that: “All process other than a subpoena may be served anywhere within the territorial limits of the state in which the district court is held and, when a statute of the United States so provides, beyond the territorial limits of that state.” No statute was cited which would authorize a service outside of the State of Pennsylvania in this case. Rule 12(b) provides, inter alia: “Every defense, in law or fact, to a claim for relief in any pleading * * * shall be asserted in the responsive pleading thereto if one is required, except that the following defenses may at the option of the pleader be made by motion: (1) lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, (2) lack of jurisdiction over the person, * *

Plaintiff’s attorney, at the oral argument, asked for leave to file a brief, which was granted until January 18, 1945 He has not filed a brief.

The Court is of the opinion that the contention of the defendant is correct and that his motion should be granted.