alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG

#### Melanie Jean Myers v. Nadene S. Brunk

March 6, 2000

Case No. CL99-167

BY JUDGE JOHN W. SCOTT, JR.

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs Motion to Compel the Defendant to Respond to Requests for Admissions, which were served on December 29, 1999. The defendant has objected in writing to each of the twenty-two requests for admissions for two reasons: that each of the requests for admissions is the result of deposition testimony, which cannot be used in support of an ultimate motion for summary judgment, and that each of the requests for admissions is irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

It is well established in Virginia that deposition testimony cannot be used to support a motion for summary judgment. See *Carson*v. *LeBlanc,*245 Va. 135 (1993).

The Court has reviewed each of the requests for admissions and rules as follows:

Defendant’s objections to requests for admissions Nos. 1 through 4 are sustained. The use of the terms “high risk,” “mental image,” and “specific recollection” are overly broad and irrelevant.

The defendant’s objections to requests for admissions Nos. 5 through 10 are overruled.

Defendant’s objections to requests for admissions Nos. 11 through 22 are sustained. The repeated request for an opinion “from (the defendant’s point of view)” is irrelevant. The defendant has not been presented as an expert and *475any opinions expressed by her during a deposition should not be permitted to be bootstrapped into an Admission. The deposition testimony of the defendant can certainly be used to impeach the defendant at the appropriate time should she offer testimony that contradicts her deposition.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7508

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN C. CURTISS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:88-cr-00053-REP-RCY; 3:12-cv-00752-REP-RCY)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John C. Curtiss, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Jessica D. Aber, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John C. Curtiss seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Curtiss has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18130]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15226 and #15227; NEBRASKA Disaster Number NE-
00069]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Nebraska

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of NEBRASKA 
(FEMA-4325-DR), dated 08/01/2017.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Straight-line Winds.
    Incident Period: 06/12/2017 through 06/17/2017.

DATES: Issued on 08/01/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/02/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/01/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
NEBRASKA, dated 08/01/2017, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Platte

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-18130 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Under
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 9, 2007
    
    /s/ GREGORY B. KENNYGregory B. KennyChief Executive OfficerDate: May 9, 2007
    
    /s/ BRIAN J. ROBINSONBrian J. Robinson
Chief Financial Officer
  52
#### Ronnie COLCLOUGH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. SUMTER LEE REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 07-7510.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 28, 2008.

Ronnie Colclough, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*539PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Colclough seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Colclough that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Colclough failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Colclough has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Order filed, November 28, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00965-CV

____________

SATYA, INC., GOPAL P. BATHIJA, AMEEN M. ALI AND SATYA GROUP II, 

LTD, Appellant

V.

VIKRAM MEHTA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-27585

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 29, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Darlene Stein, the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION BALTIMORE, MD 21235-0001

SOCIAL SECURITY

The Commissioner

Dear Participant:

Thank you for taking part in the Occupational Requirements Survey. The information you 

provide will help us, the Social Security Administration, make accurate decisions in our

disability programs, which provide financial help to more than 15 million disabled individuals 

and close to 2 million eligible dependents. 

When deciding whether an individual qualifies for disability benefits, we look at a person’s work 

history, medical condition, physical and mental ability to perform work-related tasks, and if a 

significant number of jobs exist in the economy that he or she could perform. The information 

you provide will help us to better define the jobs that exist in our national economy, and 

accordingly, the types of work that someone might be able to do.

In an effort to compile a comprehensive listing of jobs that a disability applicant may be able to 

do, we collaborated with the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics to develop a new 

Occupational Information System. This System will contain information on the skill 

requirements, the environmental conditions, and the physical and mental demands of many

different types of work available in the national economy. 

We greatly value your cooperation in providing us with information about the jobs available in 

your organization. We ask participants to provide thorough responses to BLS to ensure the 

accuracy and completeness of the resulting data. For more information about this project and 

how we use the information that you provide to help the American people, please visit our 

website at https://www.ssa.gov/disabilityresearch/occupational_info_systems.html.

Thank you again for taking part in this important survey.

Sincerely,

 Kilolo Kijakazi

Acting Commissioner
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dennis H. Lawlor, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 894]

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation imposed upon his conviction of driving while intoxicated as a felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c] [former (i)]) and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of incarceration. Defendant’s contentions with respect to the plea proceeding underlying the original judgment are not properly before us *(see People v Van Every,*26 AD3d 777 [2006]; *see also People v Hall,*5 AD3d 1011 [2004]). The *1271sentence imposed upon the violation of probation is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Smith, Green and Gorski, JJ.
j^L toutr op (\(fe&Lf>

-tjjg; ^rfc^ (OP T>vA^

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court of Appeals District

Mb $TYLER TEXAS

CATHY S. LUSK, C

(\PfcAi_ C\JUi^l tvn <3kfl-/fl/*h/d pool \rffr rQWt-t-Xi/hfiiA/

titer f/lffifiti^.tirfrAKtitor) ff 'Ti'fifc-Tn fi/f, APfcd/lfoxr^

^lo-rtlt HfiAbtM/si Jusrtte of vile &utraftf/fates:

fate A&J Mw&ti??*(WMm. Aprku/mt /k^jActk

^*&?'"§(^^^l(^C_M^k Elites A3S£3&A fatfitftfe^/ffixudte

4lS'^^f^^^M^^A ****** ***** ^ /MSL Tfi^

1(AA
§) lUZ 72 17& hfouhA*/ 6£fe&t&> ftP^T/frOr ti&S> ^Zfh 7j/Y1f7F£&> d&l£$S

JDD fal*/ 'fe.&miti 7W& 0£. kbit.

tlPtklLAZFT jJ-JdS L/rf/Wzb JZaZ<O£<31j£0£ of~Zfa*J Xt€) U££ xjtZs id UMMZ zze -rZfe -mDZZ ~7D idtteit tZz *j£hs ~RD A at SJ$

\UJUST J^h3 MOfe -T7rvi£ -to /&5£a&>/>/ /Mb <Q&2,&Oite s/Lfo

u>mk£zh 4te£8Ms/j& numt//be> td A/cz. 6t/^

fi)iL dzz&OAk? fxrimb Zte/ut, Affej/AJr &£/^&cu.r' /&&ues7s

IaISe yJ 3nZPstr t^ fffleMMFS ZMteu.

br -77t/£rY ltf&j ^OI/JDjaJ^ vtIzl ^/7h/jy^ -m F?N«7Mi<'.jcjtk/r^'T

£<£&
fcvmfifiCsi?. nf ryfl hoe.

•j

fibUZCf ZZ)PZ Af ZlZP^uaAT3 flAAvn/)*) /Pit /vz^A/,0,1 ~tn /T/£

fa Ttesf n£ &*fh*fe, nth nfld/nh -m v?Zz z/wdfoZzy' zd& Q7fe

HM&

//J 7/fe ./J/zt/^/Z/il/^/)^- V7ZzT72xZs DfZMr/ilzdr fif d/Z/MrM£

^U^I(L2,~~X^€>T/TuY7'OA54C^fd7£7DrO 7/J .ftb*!>&#&*) ('/)//aJTT</

TWOftoZ.
#### Mitchell Farnham et al., Respondents, v Brian J. Meder et al., Appellants.

[853 NYS2d 519]

Present-Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Lunn, Fahey and Pine, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 15



             ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
e.Digital Corporation and subsidiary

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-83615, Form S-3 No. 333-46619, Form S-3, No. 33-81212, Form S-
3 No. 33-92032, Form S-3 No. 33-92978, Form S-3 No. 333-4880, Form S-3 No. 333-
62387, Form S-8 No. 333-76959, Form S-8 No. 333-76961, Form S-8 No. 333-13779,
Form S-8 No. 333-17959, Form S-8 No. 333 24405, Form S-8 No. 333-26561, Form S-8
No. 333-76959, Form S-8 No. 333-76961 and Form S 3 No. 333-49312) of e.Digital
Corporation of our report dated November 13, 2000 relating to the unaudited
consolidated interim financial statements of e.Digital Corporation and
subsidiary that are included in its Quarterly Report (Form 10-QSB) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2000.


                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                      Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada
November 13, 2000

                                       16
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor 401 South 

Tryon  St. Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June1, 2013, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTOCAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, asTrust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and U.S. BANK NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates WFRBS Series 2013-C14 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms usedherein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice PresidentWells

FargoBank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Submitted April 4,

judgment of conviction on Count 3 in Case Number A133841 reversed; otherwise affirmed May 28, 2008

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*DALE WARD FAIRBANKS, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Multnomah County Circuit Court

0601-40664; 0602-41528

A133841(Control); A133842

185 P3d 556

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Sarah E. Carpenter, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael R. Washington, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*308PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged in two cases with a total of six counts of second-degree criminal trespass. ORS 164.245. One of those charges — Count 3 in Case Number A133841— was based on an incident in which police found him sleeping in Colonel Summers Park in Portland, in violation of what the police believed to be an order excluding defendant from the park. At trial, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that the state had failed to prove that he was excluded from the park at the time of the incident. The trial court denied the motion, and defendant was found guilty on all six counts. In this consolidated appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a judgment of acquittal on Count 3, because the state failed to prove that he was excluded from the park at the time of the incident. The state concedes that the record is insufficient to support the conviction on that count. We agree that the evidence was insufficient and that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal on Count 3.

Judgment of conviction on Count 3 in Case Number A133841 reversed; otherwise affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 41091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18252]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Sanctions Actions Pursuant to Executive Order 13581

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of persons whose property and 
interests in property have been unblocked pursuant to Executive Order 
13581 of July 24, 2011, ``Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal 
Organizations.''

DATES: OFAC's actions described in this notice were effective on August 
22, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Department of the Treasury's 
Office of Foreign Assets Control: Assistant Director for Licensing, 
tel.: 202-622-2480, Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 
202-622-4855, Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, 
tel.: 202-622-2490; or the Department of the Treasury's Office of the 
Chief Counsel (Foreign Assets Control), Office of the General Counsel, 
tel.: 202-622-2410.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The list of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN 
List) and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are 
available from OFAC's Web site at http://www.treasury.gov/ofac.

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On August 22, 2017, OFAC removed from the SDN List the persons 
listed below, whose property and interests in property were blocked 
pursuant to Executive Order 13581.

Individuals

    1. BOIVIN, Marie (a.k.a. BOIVIN, Marie Claude), 13 Beechgrove 
Gardens, Stittsville, Ottawa, Ontario K25 1W5, Canada; 2571 Carling 
Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K2B 7H7, Canada; DOB 03 Jul 1975 (individual) 
[TCO] (Linked To: ACCU-RATE CORPORATION; Linked To: PACNET GROUP).
    2. FERLOW, Ruth (a.k.a. FERLOW, Ruth Hilda Rose), D11 Glyme Court, 
Oxford Office Village, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxon OX5 1LQ, United 
Kingdom; 4910 Keith Road, Vancouver, BC V7W 2NI, Canada; 4th Floor, 595 
Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 2TF, Canada; DOB 05 Jan 1967; 
nationality Canada (individual) [TCO] (Linked To: PACNET SERVICES LTD.; 
Linked To: CHEXX INC.; Linked To: INDIAN RIVER (UK) LTD.; Linked To: 
PACNET GROUP).

    Dated: August 22, 2017.
Andrea Gacki,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2017-18252 Filed 8-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JIA EUGENE,

Appellant,

v.

GINGER HUBBARD,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-2970

[May 11, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE-18-

026043.

Rick S. Jacobs of Miller & Jacobs, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Warren B. Kwavnick of Cooney, Trybus, Kwavnick Peets, PLC, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 35.4



|     |  |                                                                                                           |  | 
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084,
8th Floor 401 South Tryon St. Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 |  | 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013, by and among GS Mortgage
Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and Certificate Administrator, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor and U.S. Bank
National Association as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-GC10 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|LOGO                                                 
|Daniel Bober Executive Vice
PresidentWells Fargo Bank



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO