alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 24, 2021

No. 04-21-00261-CV

IN THE MATTER OF K.A.E.,

From the 386th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021JUV00067

Honorable Jacqueline Herr-Valdez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to 

raise on appeal. Counsel certifies he served copies of the brief and motion on appellant, informed 

appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief, informed appellant of his right 

to seek discretionary review should the court of appeals declare the appeal frivolous, and 

provided appellant with a form for requesting the record and explained to appellant the procedure 

for obtaining the record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); 

Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 

S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). As of the date of this order, 

appellant has not filed the record-request motion provided to him by his counsel. 

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we ORDER that he do so by October 14, 2021. 

At this time, the State has filed a notice waiving its right to file a brief in this case unless

appellant files a pro se brief. If appellant files a timely pro se brief, the State may file a 

responsive brief no later than twenty days after appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court.

We further ORDER the motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s counsel held in 

abeyance pending further order of the court. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80–82 (1988) 

(holding that motion to withdraw should not be ruled on before appellate court independently 

reviews record to determine whether counsel’s evaluation that appeal is frivolous is sound); 

Schulman v. State, 252 S.W.3d 403, 410–11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (same). 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wisconsin Electric Power Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Allen L. Leverett, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ ALLEN L. LEVERETT
EXHIBIT 16.3









                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT


To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Chefs International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Point Pleasant, New Jersey


We  have   audited  the   accompanying   consolidated   statements   of  income,
stockholders'   equity,  and  cash  flows  of  Chefs  International,   Inc.  and
subsidiaries for the year ended January 30, 2000. These  consolidated  financial
statements   are  the   responsibility   of  the   Company's   management.   Our
responsibility  is  to  express  an  opinion  on  these  consolidated  financial
statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards  require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance  about  whether  the  consolidated  financial  statements  are free of
material  misstatement.  An audit includes examining,  on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting  principles used and significant
estimates  made by management,  as well as evaluating  the overall  consolidated
financial  statement  presentation.   We  believe  that  our  audit  provides  a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated  financial statements referred to above present
fairly,  in all material  respects,  the consolidated  results of operations and
cash flows of Chefs  International,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  for the year ended
January 30, 2000, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.



                                          /S/ EDWARD ISAACS & COMPANY LLP



New York, New York
March 27, 2000
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended November 30, 2004 of Arrow International, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frederick J. Hirt, the Senior
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge and based upon a review of the
Report, that:

        (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and periods presented as required by such Report.

        This certification is based upon, among other things, my
responsibilities as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, my own due diligence
and representations made by certain other members of the Company's senior
management.


Date: January 10, 2005

                                        /s/ Frederick J. Hirt
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Frederick J. Hirt
                                        Chief Financial Officer and
                                        Senior Vice President of Finance
                                        (Principal Financial Officer and
                                        Chief Accounting Officer)


                                      (32)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DONALD OLSON AND 6 BITS, INC., Respondents

v. JOHN F. SAYERS, IV AND K.S.A. VENDING, INC., Petitioners : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 835 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 17th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
| (logo)WELLS   

         FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel: 410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

RBS Commercial Funding, Inc.

600 Washington Blvd.

Stamford, Connecticut 06901

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent for the 301 South College Street Loan Combination (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”):

 

 

(a)       A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

To:  RBS Commercial Funding, Inc.

 

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

1.        Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2013, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian relating to the Series WFRBS 2013-C14 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates relating to the 301 South College Street Loan Combination, a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series WFRBS 2013-C13 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

 

 

To:  RBS Commercial Funding, Inc. 

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
EXHIBIT 10.16

BASE SALARY AND TARGET BONUS
FOR THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth the current annual base salaries and target bonuses of the Chief Executive Officer and the other named
executive officers of Zale Corporation (the "Company").

Name

Base Salary

Target Bonus %Theo Killion
Chief Executive Officer

$
800,000


100
%Matthew W. Appel
Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer

$
540,000


75
%Gilbert P. Hollander
Executive Vice President, Chief Merchant and Sourcing Officer

$
495,000


75
%Richard A. Lennox
Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer

$
390,000


75
%John A. Legg
Senior Vice President, Supply Chain

$
240,000


37.5
%


For
additional information regarding the compensation of the Company's executive officers, please refer to the information under the headings "Executive Compensation" in the Company's
definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 18


March 6, 2002

Board of Directors
Colorado Interstate Gas Company
1001 Louisiana
Houston, Texas 77002

Dear Directors:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form
10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and issued our
report thereon dated March 6, 2002. Note 8 to the financial statements describes
a change in the measurement date used to account for post-retirement benefits
other than pensions from December 31 to September 30. This change is considered
to be a change in accounting principle and is being made to conform the
Company's measurement date to the date used by its parent company, El Paso
Corporation, for its benefit plan. It should be understood that the
preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another, in this case
the use of a measurement date that is different from that previously used to
account for post-retirement benefits other than pensions, has not been addressed
in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence
below we have relied on management's determination that this change in
accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management's stated
reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form
10-K, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the
relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with
management that such change represents, in the Company's circumstances, the
adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 20.

Very truly yours,



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
# all data ag file, nov 2011

# Field Description

# scope of coverage
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CEDRIC HUTCHINSON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-206 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 18, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Clark v. State, 783 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 2001); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Hutchinson v. State, 129 So. 3d 368 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision); Doby v. State, 25 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Wingfield v. State, 816 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Hutchinson v. State, 249 So. 3d 1327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018); Harris v. State, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 31(b)**
I, Jeffrey L. Jacobson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Wesco FinancialCorporation (the “registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual reportbased on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Dated: March 10, 2004              /s/ Jeffrey L. Jacobson   Jeffrey L. Jacobson   Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gary D. Blackford, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    GARY D. BLACKFORDGary D. Blackford President and Chief Executive Officer May 13, 2003






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



21
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18154]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10268--Sterling Bank, Lantana, Florida

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for Sterling Bank, Lantana, Florida 
(``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its receivership for said 
institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Sterling Bank on July 
23, 2010. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been 
completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance 
with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to 
proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: August 23, 2017.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-18154 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
SIGNATURES

     Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of the  Securities  Act of  1933  and  the
Investment  Company Act of 1940,  the Trust has duly  caused  this  registration
statement to be duly signed on its behalf by the  undersigned,  duly authorized,
in the City of  Bellingham,  State of  Washington,  on the 26th day of  January,
1999.

     SATURNA  INVESTMENT  TRUST

     By  /s/  Nicholas  F.  Kaiser
         -------------------------
     Nicholas  F.  Kaiser,
     President

     Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of the  Securities  Act of  1933  and  the
Investment  Company Act of 1940,  this  amendment  has been signed  below by the
following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated.

     Signature          Title          Date
     ---------          -----          ----

/s/  Nicholas  F.  Kaiser             President; Trustee      January 26, 1999
-------------------------
     Nicholas  F.  Kaiser          (Principal  Executive  Officer)

/s/  Teresa  K.  Anderson                    Treasurer        January 26, 1999
-------------------------
     Teresa  K.  Anderson          (Principal  Financial  Officer)

**A.  Herbert  Ershig          All  other  Trustees           January 26, 1999
**  Gary  Goldfogel
**  John  E.  Love
**  John  S.  Moore

**  By            /s/  Nicholas  F.  Kaiser
                  -------------------------
     Nicholas  F.  Kaiser,  Attorney-in-fact

e
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50027

Summary Calendar

SPIRA FOOTWEAR, INC.

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

STEVEN LEBOW; BRYON LEBOW; UNGARETTI & HARRIS, LIMITED

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:08-CV-55

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Our careful review of the record on appeal in this civil matter reflects

increasingly severe sanctions for repeated and continuing contumacious conduct

by Plaintiff-Appellant Spira Footwear, Inc., culminating in the district court’s

dismissal of Spira’s case after repeated and increasingly severe lesser sanctions

had failed to accomplish their intended purposes. Our review also satisfies us

that all rulings and orders appealed from, including dismissal, represent fully

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 1, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50027 Document: 00511221542 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/01/2010
No. 10-50027

justifiable exercises of the judicial process by the district court for the reasons

patiently explained by that court in its several orders.

Accordingly, for essentially the reasons given by the district court, its

rulings, orders, and judgment are, in all respects

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-50027 Document: 00511221542 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/01/2010