alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert Martin BARRITT, Appellant v. Heather TRANT, Office of the Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, Appellee.

No. 07-5291.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 18, 2008.

Rehearing En Banc Denied April 15, 2008.

Robert Martin Barritt, Mt. Olive, WV, pi’o se.

BEFORE: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

*284ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 14, 2007, be affirmed. The district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review any decision of the Supreme Court or its employees. *See Marin v. Suter,*956 F.2d 339, 340 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. *denied,*506 U.S. 844, 113 S.Ct. 131, 121 L.Ed.2d 85 (1992); *see also id.*(noting that the Supreme Court’s “supervisory responsibility” over its Clerk is “exclusive to the Supreme Court and ... neither a district court nor a circuit court of appeals has jurisdiction to interfere with it by mandamus or otherwise”); *Sidles v. Suter,*172 F.3d 921 (D.C.Cir.1998) (Table) (“The district court properly held that the lower courts lack jurisdiction over the filing of documents by the Clerk (and Assistant Clerks) of the Supreme Court.”).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 18, 2017.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta*                     (Kathryn Haney, Director of Applications) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Applications.Comments@atl.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *SmartFinancial, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee;*                     to merge with Capstone Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Capstone Bank, both in Tuscaloosa, Alabama.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 18, 2017.

Yao-Chin Chao,

Assistant Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2017-17890 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,538,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  500,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    109,242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,352,459
<PP&E>                                       2,714,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                 775,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,334,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          796,821
<BONDS>                                        124,503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,878
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,949,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,334,825
<SALES>                                      2,839,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,049,759
<CGS>                                        1,872,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,872,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,138,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,868)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (35,925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (35,925)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
<FN>
Accounts receivable are net of allowance of $135,000 at September 30, 1997.



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12.1



|                                                    |  | Three Months EndedJune 30, |       | Six Months EndedJune 30,
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ----- | ------------------------
|                                                    |  | 2003                       |       | 2002                    
|DETERMINATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |  |                            |       |                         
|Income before provision for income taxes            |  | $                          | 2,163 |                         
|Fixed charges                                       |  |                            |       |                         
|Amortization of deferred financing costs            |  |                            | 270   |                         
|Interest expense                                    |  |                            | 4,329 |                         
|                                                    |  |                            |       |                         
|Earnings before fixed charges                       |  |                            | 6,762 |                         
|Fixed charges                                       |  |                            |       |                         
|Amortization of deferred financing costs            |  |                            | 270   |                         
|Interest expense                                    |  |                            | 4,329 |                         
|                                                    |  |                            |       |                         
|Total fixed charges                                 |  | $                          | 4,599 |                         
|                                                    |  |                            |       |                         
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  |  |                            | 1.47X |                         



18
Exhibit
23













CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-158205), and in the related Prospectus of El Paso Corporation, Colorado
Interstate Gas Company, Colorado Interstate Issuing Corporation, El Paso Natural
Gas Company, Southern Natural Gas Company, Southern Natural Issuing Corporation,
and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, of our report dated February 26,
2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Colorado Interstate Gas Company, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2009.



















Houston,
Texas


February 26,
2010
Unassociated Document


    
      

    

    Exhibit
10.25

    


    Form of
Notice of Stock Appreciation Right Grant

    


    Effective
_________, the Board of Directors of Genesis Energy, Inc. has awarded you a[n]
[initial] grant of ____ units with a strike price of $___ per
unit.  This grant will vest at 25% per year over a 4-year
period.  Each unit entitles you to receive a cash payment equal to the
difference between the strike price on the grant date and a valuation of the
unit at the time you exercise your unit.  A description of the rules
of operation of the Stock Appreciation Rights Plan can be found in the attached
copy of the Plan Document.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Each
      of
      the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her
      capacity as an officer of e.Digital Corporation (the "Company"), that, to his
      or
      her knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:
      February 13, 2008




/s/ Robert
              PutnamRobert
                    Putnam,
              Interim Chief Accounting Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)




Date:
      February 13, 2008




/s/ William
              BlakeleyWilliam
                Blakeley,President
                and
                Chief Technical Officer,
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41086-41087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18305]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10102]


Certification Pursuant to Section 7045(A)(4)(A) of the Department 
of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
2017

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as the Secretary of State, 
including pursuant to section 7045(a)(4)(A) of the Department of State, 
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2017 (Div. 
J, Pub. L. 115-31), I hereby certify that the central government of 
Guatemala is taking effective steps, which are in addition to those 
steps taken since the certification and report submitted during the 
prior year, to:
    <bullet> Inform its citizens of the dangers of the journey to the 
southwest border of the United States;

[[Page 41087]]

    <bullet> combat human smuggling and trafficking;
    <bullet> improve border security, including to prevent illegal 
migration, human smuggling and trafficking, and trafficking of illicit 
drugs and other contraband; and
    <bullet> cooperate with United States Government agencies and other 
governments in the region to facilitate the return, repatriation, and 
reintegration of illegal migrants arriving at the southwest border of 
the United States who do not qualify for asylum, consistent with 
international law.
    This certification shall be published in the Federal Register and, 
along with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, shall be 
reported to Congress.

    Dated: August 22, 2017.
Rex W. Tillerson,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-18305 Filed 8-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
     John W. Hlywak, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
     pursuant to 18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                             /s/John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                ------------------------
                                John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                December 27, 2006
#### HYND v. McGRAW et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Oct. 6, 1950.

Spring & Eastman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Coudert Brothers, New York City, Joseph A. McManus, Walter R. Barry, New York City, of counsel, for defendants.

CONGER, District Judge.

Motions by the defendants (1) to dismiss the complaint for misjoinder of claims under Rules 18(a) and 20(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A.; (2) in the alternative, to sever the claims; and (3) in the alternative, for an order granting separate trials of each claim, etc.

1. Plaintiff has joined two claims for relief, one for breach of contract against two defendants and one for plagiarism against the same two defendants and two others.

Undoubtedly, these two claims might *be*joined in *one*complaint. Rule *8318(a), F.R.C.P. However, since there are multiple defendants, Rule 20(a), F.R.C.P., must be complied with in. order to have proper joinder of claims. That Rule provides that “ * * * All persons may be joined in one action as defendants if there is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in' the alternative, any right to relief in respect of or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences and if any question of law or fact common to all of them will arise in the action * *

Although the plaintiff’s claims are not pleaded in the alternative it is plain that there can be only one recovery. It is plain, too, that the claims involve the same transactions and that there are questions common to all defendants. See Hopper v. Lennen & Mitchell, D.C.S.D.Cal. 1943, 52 F.Supp. 319; Callinan v. Federal Cash Register Co., D.C.W.Mo.1942, 3 F.R.D. 177; cf. Carl Gutmann Co. v. Rohrer Knitting Mills, D.C.E.D.Pa.1949, 86 F.Supp. 506.

In view of this disposition the defendants’ other requests for relief need not be considered.

Motion denied.

Settle order.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0231 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: MEGHAN FENOGLIO,

Petit io ner and Appellee, and WILLIAM FENOGLIO,

Respondent and Appellant. SECOND ORDER OF MEDIATOR AP POINTMENT

On May 14, 20 20 Nel s Sw andal w as appo int ed Mediat or in th is mat ter. H e has since de clined appoint me ntdue to a conflict of interest. His appo int me ntis rescinded . IT IS ORDERED THAT **Daniel B.**  **Bidegaray,** who se name appears next on th e list of attorneys desiring appoint me n t as med iators fo r D omestic Relations appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to co nduct th e mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e time p eriods set fo rth in M.R.App.P. , 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s May 15, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court c: William Fenoglio, Jami L. Rebsom, William Nels Swandal, Daniel B. Bidegaray 05/15/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0231
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ODVA, INC.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 27, 2017, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ODVA, Inc. (``ODVA'') has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Atop Technologies 
Inc., Hsinchu, TAIWAN; Dynatronix, Inc., Amery, WI; PMV Automation AB, 
Solna, SWEDEN; Buerkert Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelfingen, GERMANY; KEBA 
AG, Linz, AUSTRIA; U.I. Lapp GmbH, Stuttgart, GERMANY; MAC Valves, 
Inc., Wixom, MI; Lika Electronic Srl, Carr[egrave] (VI), ITALY; and 
Power Electronics International, Inc., East Dundee, IL, have been added 
as parties to this venture.
    Also, Lapp USA, Inc., Florham Park, NJ; Innovasic, Inc., 
Albuquerque, NM; and Beacon Global Technology, ChengDu, PEOPLE'S 
REPUBLIC OF CHINA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ODVA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 
15, 1996 (61 FR 6039).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 20, 
2017. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on May 22, 2017 (82 FR 23297).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-18176 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER LEE SCHWENK,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 789 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Page 1

Employee Contributions for Health Insurance, 1980-2000

by William J. Wiatrowski

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Originally Posted: January 30, 2003

Percent of workers receiving employer-sponsored health insurance who are required to contribute toward the cost of

coverage, 1980-2000

Required to contribute 1980 1991 2000

Single coverage 26 51 68

Family coverage 46 69 81

NOTES: Data are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics annual surveys of employee benefits. Data for 1980 and 1991 are for full-time workers in

larger private industry establishments. Data for 2000 are for full-time and part-time workers in all private industry establishments, regardless of

employment. Other data from the 2000 survey indicate there is little difference in the percent required to contribute by establishment size or by

full-time/part-time status. • The past 20 years have seen many changes in employer-provided health insurance, including a steady increase in the

percent of covered workers required to contribute toward the cost of their coverage. • When the Bureau of Labor Statistics studied benefits among larger employers in 1980, one out of four covered

workers were required to contribute toward the cost of their own coverage, and slightly less than half were required to

contribute toward the cost of family coverage. • In 1991, survey data indicated that half of those covered by health insurance among larger employers were required to

contribute for single coverage and two-thirds were required to contribute toward family coverage. • By 2000, two-thirds of covered workers had to contribute toward the cost of their own coverage and just over 80

percent had to contribute toward family coverage.

William J. Wiatrowski

Economist, Office of Safety, Health, and Working Conditions, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Telephone: (202) 691-6305; E-mail: Wiatrowski.William@bls.gov

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Division of Information and Marketing Services, PSB Suite 2850, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC

20212-0001 | www.bls.gov/OPUB | Telephone: 1-202-691-5200 | Contact Us