alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE

#### Elaine T. Mazur v. Richard P. Laverdure

May 22, 2002

Case No. (Chancery) 6433

BY JUDGE EDWARD L. HOGSHIRE

This letter opinion addresses Complainant’s request for a clarified Qualified Domestic Relations Order. While Respondent’s failure to file a written response to a Petition to Show Cause does not justify a finding of default, the Court grants relief here by clarifying the QDRO.

In accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 1408, the Court looks to Section 1(C)(2)(e) of the Marital Agreement, dated April 1, 1991, to ascertain the appropriate disposable retirement pay. This section stipulates an amount equal to Respondent’s base pay as of the date of separation, November 1, 1987: $2,520.60. The Court rejects the contention that the subsequent Section (f) implies a requirement to apply the basic pay grade for an 0-3 in February 2000, the actual date of retirement. Acknowledging such an implication would be tantamount to granting Complainant a bonus arising from Respondent’s additional service following separation, directly contrary to the language of Section (e). Complainant’s entitlement to a share of the retirement pay was fully realized on the date of separation; the fact that this right did not vest for another twelve years does not affect the size of the entitlement. Thus, the Court calculates the appropriate monthly payment to Complainant as follows:

> *497

It is important to note that the Marital Agreement of April 1,1991, was a bargained-for agreement between two parties who were represented by competent counsel. The fact that the agreement permits elective deductions, or that it fails to provide for cost-of-living increases to the base pay calculation, was discoverable at the time of negotiation and execution. Considering that neither counsel was troubled by such factors at that time, the Court sees no reason to reconstruct the document now.

Accordingly, the Court determines that $161.07 per month should be deducted from Respondent’s pre-tax retirement pay, retroactive to February 2000, in order that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service may remit payment to Complainant.

Further, the Court awards to Complainant $2,700.00 in attorney’s fees and costs incurred in connection with Respondent’s failure to notify her of his retirement and the Court’s subsequent finding of contempt. Respondent may purge himself of contempt by paying the attorney’s fees and costs within ninety days.
No. 340.

#### Grasso *v.*Lorentzen, Director.

May 13, 1946.

The motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing out of time is granted, and the petition is denied.

Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

326 U. S. 743.
Waiters and waitresses

Take orders and serve food and beverages to patrons at tables in dining 

establishment.

Cognitive and mental requirements

The qualifications that workers need to use judgment, make decisions, interact 

with others, and adapt to changes in jobs.

In 2023, work was reviewed by a supervisor more than once per day for 73.3 

percent of waiters and waitresses, and once per day for 19.3 percent.

Table 1. Percentage of waiters and waitresses with cognitive and mental 

requirements, 2023

Requirement Yes No

Pace: Pause control 24.9 75.1

Interaction with general public >99.5 <0.5

Working around crowds 18.1 81.9

Telework <0.5 >99.5

Work review: Supervising others 0.6 99.4

Work review: Presence of supervisor 96.2 3.8

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Requirements Survey

Education, training, and experience requirements

The minimum level of formal 

education required, 

credentials necessary, on-thejob training, and prior work 

experience necessary for 

average performance in jobs.

In 2023, credentials were 

required for 34.6 percent of 

waiters and waitresses. Prior 

work experience was 

required for 22.5 percent and 

on-the-job training was 

required for 97.9 percent.

No minimum education was 

required for 78.0 percent of 

waiters and waitresses.
Occupational Requirements Survey ●www.bls.gov/ors ●orsinfo@bls.gov ●202.691.6199

Environmental conditions

The various tangible or concrete hazards 

or difficulties that are in the vicinity of 

where jobs’ critical tasks are performed.

In 2023, 90.6 percent of waiters and 

waitresses were not exposed to extreme 

cold, and 98.5 percent were not exposed 

to extreme heat. Wetness was not 

present for 7.3 percent, greater than 99.5 

percent were not exposed to heavy 

vibrations, and 72.0 percent were not 

exposed to the outdoors.

Physical demands

Refer to the physical activities required to 

perform tasks in jobs. The presence and, in 

some cases, duration of these activities are 

published.

In 2023, reaching at or below the shoulder 

was required for 95.8 percent of waiters 

and waitresses and was not required for 

4.2 percent. For 6.6 percent of workers, 

reaching at or below the shoulder was 

seldom performed, for 55.5 percent 

reaching at or below the shoulder 

occurred occasionally, 30.7 percent 

frequently, and for 3.0 percent reaching at 

or below the shoulder occurred 

constantly.

Performing work in low postures was required for 62.9 percent of waiters and waitresses and was not required for 37.1 

percent.

On average, waiters and waitresses spent 2.6 percent of the workday sitting and 97.4 percent of the workday standing.

Table 2. Percentage of waiters and waitresses with physical demands, 2023

Requirement Yes No

Choice of sitting or standing <0.5 >99.5

Driving <0.5 >99.5

Climbing structure-related ramps or stairs 10.3 89.7

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Requirements Survey
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A
KNOWING OR WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATION.



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20549

         Re: Nuveen Investments, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the "Company") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

                  (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Dated as of this 13th day of August 2003.


                                  /s/ Margaret E. Wilson
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Margaret E. Wilson
                                  Senior Vice President, Finance
                                  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification
accompanies the Report and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of
the Report.
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-270-CV

IN RE JOHN ECHOLS AND SOUTHWESTERN RELATORS

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, INC.

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is

of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for

writ of mandamus is denied.

Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let

execution issue.

DIXON HOLMAN

JUSTICE

PANEL B: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ. 

HOLMAN, J. would request a response.
2

DELIVERED: June 30, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the "Company") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, as President of the Company, hereby certifies that:

          (i)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated as of this 8th day of November 2006.


                                        /s/ John P. Amboian
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John P. Amboian
                                        President


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 634 

To prohibit the Federal Emergency Management Agency from recouping 

certain assistance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2015 

Mr. GARDNER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Federal Emergency Management Agency 

from recouping certain assistance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disaster Assistance 

5 Fairness and Accountability Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RECOUPMENT OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE PROHIB7 ITED. 

8 Section 408 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

9 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5174) is 

10 amended by adding at the end the following: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 634 IS

1 ‘‘(k) RECOUPMENT OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Federal Emergency 

3 Management Agency may not take any actions to re4 coup covered assistance from a recipient of such as5 sistance if— 

6 ‘‘(A) the— 

7 ‘‘(i) application of the recipient with 

8 respect to such assistance was made in 

9 good faith and provided accurate informa10 tion; and 

11 ‘‘(ii) receipt of such assistance could 

12 reasonably have been expected by the re13 cipient; or 

14 ‘‘(B) the receipt of such assistance oc15 curred on a date that is more than 3 years be16 fore the date on which the Federal Emergency 

17 Management Agency first provides to the recipi18 ent written notification of an intent to recoup. 

19 ‘‘(2) DISCLOSURE OF FAULT.—In carrying out 

20 a recoupment of covered assistance that is not pro21 hibited under paragraph (1), the Federal Emergency 

22 Management Agency shall provide to the relevant re23 cipient documentation that demonstrates the manner 

24 in which the recipient does not satisfy paragraph 

25 (1)(A). 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 634 IS

1 ‘‘(3) COVERED ASSISTANCE DEFINED.—In this 

2 subsection, the term ‘covered assistance’ means as3 sistance provided— 

4 ‘‘(A) under this section; and 

5 ‘‘(B) in relation to a major disaster de6 clared by the President under section 401 on or 

7 after January 1, 2012.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (99)(a)



<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT (99)(a)



                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Consumers Energy Company
(the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kenneth
Whipple, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas J. Webb, as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Kenneth Whipple
------------------------------
Name:  Kenneth Whipple
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  February 19, 2003

/s/ Thomas J. Webb
------------------------------
Name:  Thomas J. Webb
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:  February 19, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of ZERO Corporation and its subsidiaries
included in the 1997 Annual Report and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                       607
<INVENTORY>                                     35,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,349
<PP&E>                                          97,241
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              164
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,956
<SALES>                                        225,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               227,804
<CGS>                                          151,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,593
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,888
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,888
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
        

</TABLE>
Número Identificador

SEN 20 2 4

______________

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO

TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES

PANEL ESPCECIAL

T

- BOARDS, LLC

Apela nte

v.

NEX GEN, LLC; SPIDER

BILLBOARD S, LLC

Apela do KL AN20 2 300 967 APELACI Ó N

procedente del

Tribunal de

Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Fajard o

C i v i l Núm.:

FA2023CV00694

Sobre:

Interdicto

Estatutario al Amparo del Art. 14.1 de la Ley 161

- 2009

Panel integrado por su presidenta, la Jueza Domínguez Irizarry, la Jueza Grana Martínez y la Jueza Boria Vizcarrondo.

Boria Vizcarrondo, Jueza Ponente.

SENTENCIA

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 2 1 de mayo de 2024

.

En atención a la Moción en Cumplimiento de Orden de Mostrar

Causa presentada el 15 de mayo de 2024 por la parte apelante, se

declara con lugar a tenor con la Regla 83( A ) del Reglamento del

Tribunal de Apelaciones, 4 LPRA Ap. XXII

- B, R.83 ( A ) , por lo que s e

ordena el archivo definitivo de esta causa.

Lo acordó y manda el Tribunal y lo certifica la Secretaria.

Lcda. Lilia M. Oquendo Sol í s Secretaria del Tribunal de Apelaciones
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6**  **99 2** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TEERAN TYRON GRESHAM , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter n District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. ( 7:03

- cr - 00064

- F

- 1 )

Submitted : October 14, 2010 Decided: October 22, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinio n . Teeran Tyron Gresham, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Teeran Tyron Gresham appeals the district court ’ s order denying his “Motion to Recall” the court’s June 2, 2009 order . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gresham , No. 7:03

- cr - 00 064

- F

- 1 (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Certification

 

I, Michael J. Mack, Jr., certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2013 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

 

 

 

 
| Date:   May 20, 2015 | By:    | */s/   Michael J. Mack*     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                      |   |                        |   |
|                      |   | Michael   J. Mack, Jr. |   |
|                      |   |                        |   |
|                      |   | President                   |   |

 

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN HARVEY TAYLOR, III, )

DOC #Y32333, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-980

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 29, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; Frederick R. Hardt, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

September 24, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00261

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF K.A.E
.,

From the 386th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021JUV00067 Honorable Jacqueline Herr

- Valdez , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel certifies he served copies of the brief and motion on appellant, informed appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief, informed ap pellant of his right to seek discretionary review should the court of appeals declare the appeal frivolous, and provided appellant with a form for requesting the record and explained to appellant the procedure for obtaining the record. See Kelly v. State

, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). As of the date of this order, appellant has not filed the reco rd

- request motion provided to him by his counsel.

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we ORDER that he do so by October 14, 2021

. At this time, the State has filed a notice waiving its right to file a brief in this case unless appellant files a pro se brief. If appellant files a timely pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than twenty days after appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court.

We further ORDER the motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s counsel held in abeyance pending further order of the court. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80

– 82 (1988) (holding that motion to withdraw should not be ruled on before appellate court independently reviews record to determine whether counsel’s evaluation that appeal is frivolous is sound); Schulman v. State , 252 S.W.3d 403, 410

– 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (same).

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 24th day of September, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ
, Clerk of Court
# Information

# Two groups

# Three groups