alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. 817 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To provide for the addition of certain real property to the reservation of the Siletz 

Tribe in the State of Oregon. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PURPOSE; CLARIFICATION. 

(a) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to facilitate fee-totrust applications for the Siletz Tribe within the geographic area 

specified in the amendment made by this Act. 

(b) CLARIFICATION.—Except as specifically provided otherwise 

by this Act or the amendment made by this Act, nothing in this 

Act or the amendment made by this Act, shall prioritize for any 

purpose the claims of any federally recognized Indian tribe over 

the claims of any other federally recognized Indian tribe. 

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY OF THE SILETZ TRIBE 

OF THE STATE OF OREGON. 

Section 7 of the Siletz Tribe Indian Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 

711e) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(f) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.— 

‘‘(A) TITLE.—The Secretary may accept title to any 

additional number of acres of real property located within 

the boundaries of the original 1855 Siletz Coast Reservation 

established by Executive order dated November 9, 1855, 

comprised of land within the political boundaries of Benton, 

Douglas, Lane, Lincoln, Tillamook, and Yamhill Counties 

in the State of Oregon, if that real property is conveyed 

or otherwise transferred to the United States by or on 

behalf of the tribe. 

‘‘(B) TRUST.—Land to which title is accepted by the 

Secretary under this paragraph shall be held in trust by 

the United States for the benefit of the tribe. 

‘‘(2) TREATMENT AS PART OF RESERVATION.—All real property that is taken into trust under paragraph (1) shall— 

‘‘(A) be considered and evaluated as an on-reservation 

acquisition under part 151.10 of title 25, Code of Federal 

Regulations (or successor regulations); and 

‘‘(B) become part of the reservation of the tribe. 

‘‘(3) PROHIBITION ON GAMING.—Any real property taken 

into trust under paragraph (1) shall not be eligible, or used, 
S. 817—2 

for any gaming activity carried out under the Indian Gaming 

Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17529]



[[Page 39560]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 2038]


Approval of Subzone Status; Glovis America, Inc.; Shreveport, 
Louisiana

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act (FTZ) provides for ``. . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR part 400) provide for the 
establishment of subzones for specific uses;
    Whereas, the Caddo-Bossier Parishes Port Commission, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 145, has made application to the Board for the 
establishment of a subzone at the facility of Glovis America, Inc., 
located in Shreveport, Louisiana (FTZ Docket B-24-2017, docketed April 
12, 2017);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (82 FR 18282, April 18, 2017) and the application has 
been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; 
and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's memorandum, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby approves subzone status at the 
facility of Glovis America, Inc., located in Shreveport, Louisiana 
(Subzone 145B), as described in the application and Federal Register 
notice, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.13.

    Dated: August 11, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations performing the non-
exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement & Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-17529 Filed 8-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40571-40572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18053]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


U.S. Air Force Exclusive Patent License

AGENCY: Air Force Research Laboratory Information Directorate, 
Department of the Air Force, DOD.

[[Page 40572]]


ACTION: Notice of intent to issue an exclusive patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of agency regulations, the 
Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant Sensible 
Spreader Technologies, LLC, a corporation of New Hampshire having a 
place of business at 844 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire 03101, 
an exclusive license in any right, title and interest the United States 
Air Force has in: In U.S. Patent 8,428,993 entitled ``Method and 
Apparatus for Risk Identification and Mitigation in Shift Work 
Fatigue'', issued on April 23, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  An exclusive license for this patent 
will be granted unless a written objection is received within fifteen 
(15) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Written 
objections should be sent to: Air Force Research Laboratory, Office of 
the Staff Judge Advocate, AFRL/RIJ, 26 Electronic Parkway, Rome, New 
York 13441-4514. Telephone: (315) 330-2087; Facsimile (315) 330-7583.

Henry Williams,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-18053 Filed 8-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
#### Perry and others *v.*Corby and another.1

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri.*

October 1, 1884.)

General Assignment by Insolvent Debtor—Rev. St. Missouri, *§*354, Construed.

A conveyance which is not in terms a voluntary assignment for the benefit of creditors, but is in fact a conveyance of the entire property of an .insolvent debtor to one creditor, is, whatever its form may be, within the purview of section 354 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, and will inure to the benefit of all creditors.

In Equity. Motion to set aside order overruling demurrer to bill.

For a statement of facts, and the opinion upon the demurrer, see 21 Fed. Rep. 15.

*Mills & Flitcraft,*for complainants.

*John D. Johnson*and *Smith P. Galt,*for defendants.

1

 Reported by Benj. F. Rex, Esq., of the St. Louis bar.

Brewer, J.,

*(orally.)*In the case of Perry against Corby, in which the demurrer to the bill was overruled by me, after argument last spring, a motion was made to set aside that order, and the question involved was heard before the entire bench. That question is whether a conveyance which is not in terms and according to the old technical definition a “voluntary assignment for the benefit of creditors,” and yet which is in fact a conveyance of the entire property of the insolvent to one creditor, is within the purview of that statute of Missouri which provides that every voluntary assignment for the benefit' of creditors shall inure to the benefit of all creditors. My own views were expressed in the opinion that I filed; and yet in the decision I followed the ruling which had been laid down by my predecessor in office. The case was argued before Mr. Justice Miller and the entire bench, and I am authorized by Mr. Justice Miller to say that he agrees with Judge McCrary, and holds that such a transfer, although there is technically no assignee, so long as it is made of the entire property of the insolvent, and is not a mere giving of security by way of mortgage, contemplating payment by the mortgagor in the future, and the retention of possession by him, comes within the scope of the statute, and is to be treated as an assignment, and inures to the benefit of all the creditors.

As to the other questions, lie agrees with the views I expressed. Therefore the motion to set aside the order overruling the demurrer will be denied.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2938109-JUN-201108:12 AM
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A
KNOWING OR WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATION.



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20549

         Re: Nuveen Investments, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the "Company") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

                  (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Dated as of this 13th day of August 2003.


                                   /s/ Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                   Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification
accompanies the Report and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of
the Report.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 608 

To prevent homeowners from being forced to pay taxes on forgiven mortgage 

loan debt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2015 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself, Mr. HELLER, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. ISAKSON) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To prevent homeowners from being forced to pay taxes on 

forgiven mortgage loan debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage Forgiveness 

5 Tax Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME 

7 OF DISCHARGE OF QUALIFIED PRINCIPAL 

8 RESIDENCE INDEBTEDNESS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (E) of section 

10 108(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 608 IS

1 amended by section 102 of the Tax Increase Prevention 

2 Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–295), is amended by strik3 ing ‘‘before January 1, 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘subject to 

4 an arrangement that is entered into and evidenced in writ5 ing before January 1, 2017’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall apply to any arrangement entered into 

8 and evidenced in writing before January 1, 2017. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge, theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 ofGraphic Packaging Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’) filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requrements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                                                      | /s/ JOHN T. BALDWIN |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|   | Name: John. T. Baldwin                                    |
|   | Title: Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  May 6, 2004                                   |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 4, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00365

- CV

IN RE The John O. YATES Trust

From the Probate Court No 1

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 116847

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

A ppellant’s reply brief is currently due on January 10 , 20 2 2

. On December 23, 2021

, appellant filed a motion requesting a n extension of time to file his reply brief until January 21,

2022

. A fter consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant to file his reply brief

by January 21, 2022

.

It is so ORDERED on January 4, 2022.

PE R CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 7, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130443 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. ARNETTA GRABLE, Pers onal Representative Stephen J. Markman, of the Estate of LAMAR GRABLE, Deceased, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130443 COA: 256215 Wayne CC: 99-906156-NO EUGENE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0531 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 7, 2006

Clerk
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of WISCONSIN dated August 18, 2017.
 DATES: Issued on 8/18/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/17/2017 *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/16/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. *Incident:*
                     Flash Floods and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                     07/11/2017 The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Kenosha, Racine, Walworth *Contiguous Counties:* WISCONSIN Jefferson, Milwaukee, Rock, Waukesha ILLINOIS Boone, Lake, Mchenry The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.875Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.938Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.430Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.215Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.215Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15249 6 and for economic injury is 15250 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Wisconsin Illinois. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: August 18, 2017. Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2017-18384 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements of Chefs International,  Inc. and Subsidiaries  included in
the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended January  31,1999,  and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000201424
<NAME>                        Chefs International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1
<CURRENCY>                    USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JAN-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                            871,950
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      71,278
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       995,647
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,699,702
<PP&E>                         19,747,731
<DEPRECIATION>                  7,322,169
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 17,400,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,046,544
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           44,884
<OTHER-SE>                     13,380,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   17,400,735
<SALES>                        18,693,692
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               18,863,085
<CGS>                           6,141,920
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  18,329,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   93,909
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                128,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   311,192
<INCOME-TAX>                       20,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               290,592
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      290,592
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.06
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 8 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                  S. 8

 To provide for the approval of the Agreement for Cooperation Between 
 the Government of the United States of America and the Government of 
   the Kingdom of Norway Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 1, 2016

Mr. Corker (for himself and Mr. Cardin) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the approval of the Agreement for Cooperation Between 
 the Government of the United States of America and the Government of 
   the Kingdom of Norway Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT 
              OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE 
              KINGDOM OF NORWAY CONCERNING PEACEFUL USES OF NUCLEAR 
              ENERGY.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the provisions for congressional 
consideration of a proposed agreement for cooperation in subsection d. 
of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), the 
Agreement for Cooperation Between the Government of the United States 
of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Norway Concerning 
Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, done at Washington June 11, 2016, may 
be brought into effect on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, as if all the requirements in such section for consideration of 
such agreement had been satisfied, subject to subsection (b).
    (b) Applicability of Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Other Provisions 
of Law.--Upon entering into effect, the agreement referred to in 
subsection (a) shall be subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy 
Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) and any other applicable United 
States law as if such agreement had come into effect in accordance with 
the requirements of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 
U.S.C. 2153).
                                 <all>
```