alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                        GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Form 10-QSB of Global  Entertainment
Corporation  (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2007, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Quarterly Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company each hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
          13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Dated April 16, 2007


/s/ Richard Kozuback
--------------------------------------------------
Richard Kozbuack
President & Chief Executive Officer



/s/ J. Craig Johnson
--------------------------------------------------
J. Craig Johnson
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 11, 2009
    /s/ Edward K. ChristianEdward K. ChristianChief Executive OfficerDated: May 11, 2009
    /s/ Samuel D. BushSamuel D. BushChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          1,192,000
<SECURITIES>                                   24,106,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,855,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,595,000
<PP&E>                                        172,619,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                104,836,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 98,378,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,040,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       10,014,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,614,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   98,378,000
<SALES>                                         5,720,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,016,000
<CGS>                                           2,209,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,310,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,939,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 7,591,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,882,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,882,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .51
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     UT
<LEGEND>
  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
  THE STATEMENT OF INCOME, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS, BALANCE SHEET, AND
  STATEMENT OF COMMON STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>         0000201533
<NAME>        CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       4,356 
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                       721 
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                            654 
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        1,218 
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,949 
<COMMON>                                          841 
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                         452 
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                               363 
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  1,714 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             220 
<PREFERRED>                                       238 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            1,146 
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                377 
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                         223 
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      0 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                     545 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0 
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        74 
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   34 
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  2,436 
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   6,949 
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       3,769 
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                              152 
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      3,136 
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      3,288 
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                           481 
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 13 
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                    494 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          173 
<NET-INCOME>                                      321 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        37 
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                     284 
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          218 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                         131 
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            758 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 

<PAGE>

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants

   As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report on Chittenden Corporation dated January 12, 2001
(except with respect to the matter discussed in Note 21, as to which the date
is January 26, 2001), included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No.
333-80747) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-81197, 333-58133, 333-25531, 333-25765).

                                   /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 9, 2001
#### Ishwer Singh GILL, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-72341.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 20, 2007.*

Filed Jan. 4, 2008.

George T. Heridis, Esq., Rai & Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Genevieve Holm, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*819Before: SKOPIL, FARRIS, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Ishwer Singh Gill, a native and citizen of India, petitions for a review of a final decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), affirming an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. We deny the petition for review.

DISCUSSION

The IJ properly denied Gill’s applications for asylum and withholding of removal because his testimony was not credible. The inconsistencies cited by the IJ “are neither minor nor insignificant, but are central to [Gill’s] claim of past persecution and abuse.” *Kohli v. Gonzales,*478 F.3d 1061, 1071 (9th Cir.2007). For example, Gill’s statements regarding how he fled the country and whether he stayed in his village or hid in other parts of India after his last arrest “went to the heart of [his] claim because it involved the very event upon which he predicated his claim for asylum.” *See Don v. Gonzales,*476 F.3d 738, 741 (9th Cir.2007). His failure to explain the details of his political or religious beliefs also undermined his claims of persecution. *See Singh v. Ashcroft,*367 F.3d 1139, 1143 (9th Cir.2004) (political beliefs); *Mejiar-Paiz v. INS,*111 F.3d 720, 724 (9th Cir.1997) (religious beliefs).

The IJ denied CAT relief based on “changed country conditions.” We agree that changes in India make it unlikely that Gill would be subjected to torture if he returns. The State Department reports that “law and order ... is by all accounts essentially normal” and “[t]here is no evidence that Sikhs ... face harassment, mistreatment or persecution merely on their religion or political opinions.” Although these are generalized statements, the IJ properly examined Gill’s individualized situation, noting he agreed that authorities would not consider him to be a criminal or have “ties to militants” and therefore he would not likely be arrested and tortured. *See Marcos v. Gonzales,*410 F.3d 1112, 1121 (9th Cir.2005) (noting this circuit requires the IJ to make an “individualized determination whether changed conditions ... will affect [petitioner’s] specific situation”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 602 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to consider certain time spent by 

members of reserve components of the Armed Forces while receiving 

medical care from the Secretary of Defense as active duty for purposes 

of eligibility for Post-9/11 Educational Assistance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2015 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to consider certain 

time spent by members of reserve components of the 

Armed Forces while receiving medical care from the Secretary of Defense as active duty for purposes of eligibility 

for Post-9/11 Educational Assistance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GI Bill Fairness Act 

5 of 2015’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 602 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN TIME SPENT RECEIV2 ING MEDICAL CARE FROM SECRETARY OF 

3 DEFENSE AS ACTIVE DUTY FOR PURPOSES 

4 OF ELIGIBILITY FOR POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL 

5 ASSISTANCE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3301(1)(B) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘12301(h),’’ 

8 after ‘‘12301(g),’’. 

9 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—The amendment 

10 made by subsection (a) shall apply as if such amendment 

11 were enacted immediately after the enactment of the Post12 9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 (Public 

13 Law 110–252). 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory R. Pattison, Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 266]

*1158Defendant further contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment based on the violation of his right to testify before the grand jury without conducting a hearing. We agree with defendant that a hearing is required. It is undisputed that, pursuant to CPL 190.50 (5) (a), defendant’s attorney served the People with written notice of defendant’s intention to testify before the grand jury when the matter was presented. The record contains correspondence between the prosecutor and defense counsel concerning the possibility of a plea agreement prior to presentment. The prosecutor stated therein that the “grand jury will convene in the middle of January, 2003” and, in a subsequent letter, the prosecutor stated that the “grand jury will proceed as scheduled.” We conclude that the court erred in determining that, based on those letters, defendant was provided with adequate notice of the time and place of the grand jury proceeding, sufficient to satisfy the statutory notice requirements. CPL 190.50 (5) (b) expressly provides that, “[u]pon service upon the district attorney of a notice requesting appearance before a grand jury . . . , the district attorney must . . . serve upon the applicant ... a notice that he [or she] will be heard by the grand jury *at a given time and*place” (emphasis supplied). Contrary to the court’s determination, those letters do not establish the People’s compliance with the statute. Although the prosecutor may have provided oral notice of that information, there is no evidence in the record that the prosecutor in fact did so. We therefore hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to County Court for a reconstruction hearing to determine whether the People complied with CPL 190.50 (5) (b). Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Gorski, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11429

Conference Calendar

MARK ANTHONY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

DAN JOSLIN,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CV-1790

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Anthony, federal prisoner # 05991-062, appeals the

dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas

petition, construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction. Anthony challenged his conviction

and sentence for conspiracy to distribute more than 50 grams of

cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). 

Because Anthony’s claims relate to errors that allegedly

occurred at or prior to sentencing, his claims could not be
No. 05-11429

-2-

asserted in a § 2241 petition. See Reyes-Requena v. United

States, 243 F.3d 893, 900 (5th Cir. 2001); Tolliver v. Dobre, 211

F.3d 876, 877 (5th Cir. 2000). Moreover, Anthony has not shown

that he is entitled to proceed under § 2241 based on the “savings

clause” of § 2255. See Reyes-Requena, 243 F.3d at 901, 904. 

Anthony’s argument that the restrictions on obtaining relief

pursuant to § 2241 and the savings clause of § 2255 constitute a

violation of the Suspension Clause is without merit. See id. at

901 n.19. 

As Anthony does not address the district court’s finding

that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider his motion

under § 2255, any challenge to that finding has been abandoned. 

See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d

744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25

(5th Cir. 1993). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### WALLING v. John J. BOLAND et al. SAME v. BROWN STEAMSHIP CO. SAME v. BISON STEAMSHIP CORPORATION. SAME v. SHASTA STEAMSHIP CO.

Civil Actions Nos. 2080-2083.

District Court, W. D. New York.

April 13, 1945.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The, decision in Walling v. American S. S. Co., 4 F.R.D. 355, is applicable to the motions in the above cases submitted herewith.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40810

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SILVERIO MIRANDA-ROMAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:08-CR-1661-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Silverio MirandaRoman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Miranda-Roman has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 20, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-40810 Document: 00511086217 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2003, of Colorado Interstate Gas Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                              /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Greg G. Gruber
                                              Senior Vice President, Chief
                                              Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)

                                              March 15, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Colorado Interstate Gas Company and will be retained by Colorado
Interstate Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
EX-35.6
(logo) Rialto
CAPITAL

February 28, 2014

To:  Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor
     U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
     Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Certificate
     Administrator and Tax Administrator and Custodian


2013 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Name of Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificate Series:

* WFRBS 2013-C14

(Referred to herein as "Security Agreement" or "Security Agreements")

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as
special servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

1.  All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under
    each of the Security Agreements are performed on behalf of the Special
    Servicer.

2.  A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer
    for the period of June 6, 2013 to December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period")
    in accordance with the servicing agreements applicable to each Security
    Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

3.  To the best of my knowledge, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
    obligations under the terms of the Security Agreements, in all material
    respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to
    fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and
    the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herewith.


Certified by: /s/ Thekla Salzman
                  Thekla Salzman
                  Chief Administrative Officer


Date: February 28, 2014