An official website of the United States government 
	  
	Here is how you know
 Department of Labor Logo  United States Department of Labor
 **The .gov means it's official.**
			 Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information,
			make sure you're on a federal government site.
 **The site is secure.**
			 The
			**https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any
			information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
 Follow Us
 
 Release Calendar Blog
 Search button
          Search:


Menu

  Search button
          Search:
	
	  Follow Us Follow Us on X, formerly referred to as Twitter| Release Calendar | Blog
    Home
        About BLS
		History	
		Our Leadership
		Budget and Performance		
		Questions and Answers	
		A-Z Index	
		Glossary	
		Careers at BLS	
		BLS Speakers Available
		Errata  				
		Contact BLSOverview of BLS Statistics
		Guide to Programs & Services
		Demographics
		Industries
		Business Costs
		Occupations
		GeographyResources For
		Business Leaders
		Consumers
		Developers
		Economists
		Investors
		Jobseekers
		Media
		Public Policymakers
		Researcher		
		Students & Teachers
		Survey Respondents
    Subjects
        Inflation & Prices
		Consumer Price Index
		Producer Price Indexes
		Import/Export Price Indexes
		Contract Escalation
		Price Index Research
		Pay & Benefits
		Employment Cost Index
		Employer Costs for Employee Compensation
						Wage Data by Occupation
		Earnings by Demographics
		Earnings by Industry
		County Wages  
		Benefits
		Modeled Wage Estimates		
		Compensation Research
		Strikes & Lockouts
		Wage Records from Unemployment Insurance
		Occupational RequirementsUnemployment
		National Unemployment Rate
		State & Local Unemployment Rates
		Unemployment Research
		Employment
		National Employment
		State & Local Employment
		County Employment 
		Worker Characteristics
		American Indian Report
		Employment Projections
		Job Openings & Labor Turnover Survey
		Business Response Survey
		Employment by Occupation
		Work Experience Over Time
		Business Employment Dynamics
		Foreign Direct Investment
		Employment Research
		Workplace InjuriesProductivity
		Labor and Total Factor Productivity
		Productivity Research
		Spending & Time Use
		Consumer Expenditures
		How Americans Spend Time			
		International
		International Technical Cooperation
		Import/Export Price Indexes
		Geographic Information
		Northeast (Boston-New York)
		Mid-Atlantic (Philadelphia)
		Southeast (Atlanta)
		Midwest (Chicago)
		Southwest (Dallas)
		Mountain-Plains (Kansas City)
		West (San Francisco)
    Data Tools
        Data Retrieval Tools
		BLS Popular Series
		Series Report
		Top Picks, One Screen, Multi-Screen, and Maps
		Data Finder
		Public Data APICharts and Applications
		Charts for Economic News Releases	
		CPI Inflation Calculator	
		Injury and Illness Calculator		
		Pay Measure Comparison
		Demographic Data Sources
		COVID-19 Economic Trends
		Industry Productivity Viewer
		Employment and Wages Data Viewer
		Industry Finder from the Quarterly Census of Employment and WagesCustomized Tables
		U.S. Economy at a Glance
		Regions, States & Areas at a Glance
		Industry at a Glance			
		Text Files
		News Release Tables
		
		More Sources of Data
		Restricted Data Access
		Discontinued Databases
		Questions & Answers
		Special Notices
    Publications
        Latest Publications
		The Economics Daily
		Monthly Labor Review
		Beyond the Numbers
		Spotlight on Statistics
		Reports
		Commissioner's Corner
		Videos
		Career OutlookOccupational Outlook Handbook
		Geographic Profile
		Handbook of Methods
		Research Papers
		Copyright Information
		Contact & Help
		Weekly Update
    Economic Releases
        Latest Releases
		Major Economic Indicators
		Schedules for news Releases
		By Month
		By News Release
		Current Year
		Prior Years
		Archived News ReleasesEmployment & Unemployment
		Monthly
		Quarterly, annual, and other
		Inflation & Prices
		Pay & Benefits & Workplace Injuries
		Productivity & Technology
		Employment Projections
		Regional News Releases
    Classroom
        K-12 Student & Teacher Resources		
        Games & Quizzes
		Student's Desk
		Teacher's Desk
		Questions & Answers
    Beta
        Redesigned News Releases


Overview
                     Concepts
                     Data sources
                     DesignFrame constructionStratificationSample sizeAllocation methodsSample selectionSampling weights
                     Calculation
                     Presentation
                     History
                     More Info
                 
                 
              
			                   	
                                  
		
		












	
	
	
	
	Methods Home
        About
		Programs
		Glossarysearch
	                 

				 				 				                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 					
				                
	             Handbook of Methods > 
					                      Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

                 Handbook of Methods Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics Design
                     Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics: Design
				  
				   				   
			  
			   				
				
				
				
			  				
				
				
				
			  				
				
				
				
			  				
				
				
				
			  				
				
				
				
			  				
				
				
				
			   



The Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) survey is based on a probability sample drawn from a universe of about 8 million in-scope establishments stratified by geography, industry, size, and ownership. The sample is designed to represent all nonfarm establishments in the United States.
Semiannual samples are referred to as panels. The survey is conducted over a rolling six-panel (or 3-year) cycle. This is done to provide adequate geographic, industrial, and occupational coverage. Over the course of a six-panel (or 3-year) cycle, approximately 1.1 million establishments are sampled. To the extent possible, private sector units selected in any one panel are not sampled again in the next five panels. For example, in a cycle, data collected in May 2020 are combined with data collected in November 2019, May 2019, November 2018, May 2018, and November 2017.
A probability sample is taken of local government establishments, private sector establishments, and state schools and hospitals.
Frame construction
The sampling frame, or universe, is a list of about 8 million in-scope nonfarm establishments that file unemployment insurance (UI) reports to the state workforce agencies. Employers are required by law to file these reports to the state where each establishment is located. Every quarter, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) creates a national sampling frame by combining the administrative lists of unemployment insurance reports from all of the states into a single database called the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). Every 6 months, OEWS extracts the administrative data of establishments that are in scope for the OEWS survey from the most current QCEW. QCEW files were supplemented with frame files covering establishments in Guam and the rail transportation industry (NAICS 4821) because these are outside the UI program’s scope.
Construction of the sampling frame includes a process in which establishments that are linked together into multiunit companies are assigned to either the May or November sample. This prevents BLS from contacting multiunit companies more than once per year for this survey. Furthermore, the frame is matched to the five prior sample panels, and units that have been previously selected in the five prior panels are marked as ineligible for sampling for the current panel.
Stratification
Establishments in the sampling frame are stratified by geographic area, industry group, ownership, and size.
*Geography*
There are 588 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and nonmetropolitan or Balance-of-State (BOS) areas specified. MSAs are defined and mandated by the Office of Management and Budget. Each officially defined metropolitan area within a state is specified as a substate area. Cross-state MSAs have a separate portion for each state contributing to that MSA. In addition, states may have up to six residual nonmetropolitan areas that together cover the remaining non-MSA portion of their state.
*Industry*
There are****304 industry groups defined at the NAICS 3-, 4-, 5-, or 6-digit level.
Ownership**
Schools are stratified by state government, local government, or private ownership. Also, local government casinos and gambling establishments are sampled separately from the rest of local government.
*Size*
Establishments are divided into certainty and noncertainty size classes.
At any given time, there are about 146,000 nonempty State/MSA-BOS/NAICS 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-digit/ownership strata on the frame. When comparing nonempty strata between frames, there may be substantial frame-to-frame differences. The differences are due primarily to normal establishment birth and death processes and normal establishment growth and shrinkage. Other differences are due to establishment NAICS reclassification and changes in geographic location.
A small number of establishments indicate the state in which their employees are located, but do not indicate the specific county in which they are located. These establishments are also sampled and used in the calculation of the statewide and national estimates. They are not included in the estimates of any substate area. Therefore, the sum of the employment in the MSAs and nonmetropolitan areas within a state may be less than the statewide employment.
Sample size
The combined sample for the May 2020 survey is the equivalent of six panels. To the extent possible, private sector units selected in any one panel are not sampled again in the next five panels. The sample allocations, excluding federal government and U.S. Postal Service (USPS), for the panels in this cycle are:
179,824 establishments for May 2020
179,391 establishments for November 2019
182,809 establishments for May 2019
186,679 establishments for November 2018
186,125 establishments for May 2018
185,450 establishments for November 2017
The May 2020 data include a census of 8,129 federal and USPS units. The combined sample size for the May 2020 estimates is approximately 1.1 million establishments, which includes only the most recent data for federal and state government. Federal and state government units from older panels are deleted to avoid double counting.
Allocation methods
The sampling frame is stratified into approximately 146,000 nonempty State/MSA-BOS/NAICS 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-digit/ownership strata. Each time a sample is selected, a six-panel allocation of the 1.1 million sample units among these strata is performed. The largest establishments are removed from the allocation because they will be selected with certainty once during the six-panel cycle. For the remaining noncertainty strata, a set of minimum sample size requirements based on the number of establishments in each cell is used to ensure coverage for industries and MSAs. For each State/MSA-BOS/NAICS 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-digit/ownership stratum, a sample allocation is calculated using a power Neyman allocation.[1] The actual six-panel sample allocation is the larger of the minimum sample allocation and the power allocation. To determine the current single panel allocation, the six-panel allocation is divided by 6, and the resulting quotient is randomly rounded.
Two factors influence the power Neyman allocation. One is the square root of the employment size of each stratum. With a Neyman allocation, strata with higher levels of employment generally are allocated more samples than strata with lower levels of employment. Using the square root within the Neyman allocation softens this effect. The other is a measure of the occupational variability of the industry based on prior OEWS survey data. The occupational variability of an industry is measured by computing the coefficient of variation (CV) for each occupation within the 90⁠th percentile of occupational employment in a given industry, averaging those CVs, and then calculating the standard error from that average CV. Using this measure, industries that tend to have greater occupational variability will get more samples than industries that are more occupationally homogeneous.
Sample selection
Sample selection within strata is approximately proportional to size. In order to provide the most occupational coverage, establishments with higher employment are more likely to be selected than those with lower employment; some of the largest establishments are selected with certainty. The unweighted employment of sampled establishments makes up approximately 56.3 percent of total employment.
Permanent random numbers (PRNs) are used in the sample selection process. To minimize sample overlap between the OEWS survey and other large surveys conducted by BLS, each establishment is assigned a PRN. For each stratum, a specific PRN value is designated as the “starting” point to select a sample. From this “starting” point, we sequentially select the first ‘*n’*eligible establishments in the frame into the sample, where ‘*n*’ denotes the number of establishments to be sampled.
Sampling weights
Sampling weights are computed so that each panel will roughly represent the entire universe of establishments.
Federal government, USPS, and state government units are assigned a panel weight of 1. Other sampled establishments are assigned a design-based panel weight, which reflects the inverse of the probability of selection.
Notes
[1] The Power Neyman allocation is a statistical method of balancing the efficiency of the overall estimate with the efficiency of subnational estimates. For more information, see “Power Allocations: Determining Sample Sizes for Subnational Areas,” Michael D. Bankier, *The American Statistician*, vol. 42, no. 3 (Aug., 1988), pp. 174–177.

				    				   
				   				   
                 Last Modified Date: March 31, 2021 Facebook
 Twitter
 LinkedIn


Home
   Subjects
   Data Tools
   Publications
   Economic Releases
   Classroom
   Beta


**U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics**
Division of Information and Marketing Services 
PSB Suite 2850 
2 Massachusetts Avenue NE  
Washington, DC 20212-0001 Telephone:1-202-691-5200 Telecommunications Relay Service:7-1-1 www.bls.gov/OPUB Contact Us
 resources  Inspector General (OIG)
								Budget and Performance	
								Department of Labor Grants									
								No Fear Act
								USA.gov
								Vote.gov
 about the site  Sitemap						
								Freedom of Information Act
								Privacy and Security Statement
								Disclaimers
								Linking and Copyright Info	
								Important Website Notices
								Help and Tutorials
								Babel Notice: accessing language services


Twitter Youtube Email


- Publications
- Handbook of Methods