alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3


THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A
KNOWING OR WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATION.



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20549

         Re: Nuveen Investments, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the "Company") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

                  (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Dated as of this 6th day of August 2004.


                                                  /s/ Margaret E. Wilson
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Margaret E. Wilson
                                                  Senior Vice President, Finance
                                                  (Principal Financial and
                                                   Accounting Officer)
FRONTIER OIL CORPORATION
                  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Frontier Oil Corporation (incorporated in Wyoming)

    662712 Alberta Ltd. (incorporated in Alberta)

    Wainoco Resources, Inc. (incorporated in Delaware),
      a subsidiary of Frontier Oil Corporation.

    Wainoco Oil & Gas Company (incorporated in Delaware),
      a subsidiary of Wainoco Resources, Inc.

    Frontier Holdings Inc. (incorporated in Delaware),
      a subsidiary of Frontier Oil Corporation.

        Frontier Refining & Marketing Inc. (incorporated in Delaware),
          a subsidiary of Frontier Holdings Inc.

          Frontier Refining Inc. (incorporated in Delaware),
            a subsidiary of Frontier Refining & Marketing Inc.

          Frontier Oil and Refining Company (incorporated in Delaware),
            a subsidiary of Frontier Refining & Marketing Inc.

          Frontier Pipeline Inc. (incorporated in Delaware),
            a subsidiary of Frontier Refining & Marketing Inc.

          Frontier El Dorado Refining Company (incorporated in Delaware),
            a subsidiary of Frontier Refining & Marketing Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,873
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,158
<INVENTORY>                                     17,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,960
<PP&E>                                          29,574
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,735)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,707
<SALES>                                        131,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,566
<CGS>                                           47,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (686)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,341
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,432)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,773
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,800)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,973
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.92
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 11

GLASSMASTER COMPANY
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
For the two years ended August 31
(Thousands except for per share figures)

2003
    
    2002Primary:Loss from Continuing Operations
    
    
    ($322
    )
    
    
    ($543
    )Loss from Discontinued Operations
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0Net Loss
    
    
    ($322
    )
    
    
    ($543
    )Basic:Average Shares Outstanding
    
    
    1,643
    
    
    
    1,636Per Share Amounts:Continuing Operations
    
    
    ($.20
    )
    
    
    ($.33
    )Discontinued Operations
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0Net Loss
    
    
    ($.20
    )
    
    
    ($.33
    )Diluted:Average Shares Outstanding
    
    
    1,643
    
    
    
    1,636Net effect of dilutive stock options under the treasury stock
method using the average market price
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0Total
    
    
    1,643
    
    
    
    1,636Per Share Amounts:Continuing Operations
    
    
    ($.20
    )
    
    
    ($.33
    )Discontinued Operations
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0Net Loss
    
    
    ($.20
    )
    
    
    ($.33
    )


32
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Gliatech
Inc's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          18,024
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      303
<ALLOWANCES>                                        11
<INVENTORY>                                        404
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,135
<PP&E>                                           2,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,941
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            73
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,132
<SALES>                                            563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,825
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,807
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     6
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,131)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,131)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)
        

</TABLE>
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS MARGI E ORTEGA, Ap pe lla nt,
v. ART GONZ AL EZ AND JAMES RASCOE, Ap pe lle e s. § § § § § § No. 08-08-00187- CV

Appea l from the 394th District Court of Hudspeth County , Texas (TC#3905-394)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION This appea l is be fore the Court on its own moti on for de termination as to whethe r the a ppeal sh ou ld be dis mis se d fo r wa nt of pr os e c uti on . On Ma

y 21 , 20 08 , Ap pe lla

nt fi le d he r n oti c e of

a pp e a l. Ho we ve r, Ap pe lla

nt fa ile d to te nd e r the re qu ir e d fi lin g fe e . No tic e of thi s f a ilure wa s p ro vid e d to Ap pe lla nt by c or re sp on de nc e of the same date
. Ap pe lla nt wa s inf or me d tha t the fe e ha d to be pa id withi n t we n ty

day s. Appellant wa s warne d that failure to do so could result in dismis sal of the
a p p e a l
. D e s p i t e t h e p a s s a g e o f t h i s d e a d l i n e , A p p e l l an th a s f a i l e d t o t e n d e r

t h e f i l i n g f e e . In add iti on , Ap pe lla

nt fa ile d to re qu e st a re po rt e r’ s re c or d and fa ile d to fi le the c le rk ’s reco rd. By
corr espondenc e date d May 28, 2008, the Clerk of the Court g ave notice of such f ailures a nd of the Court’s intent to dism iss the a ppeal if Appellant did not provide g rounds for its continuanc e by J une2

10, 2008. Appellant made no response . There fore , pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedur e 5, 37.3, and 42.3, this appea l is dism issed with prejudice
.

KENNET H R. CARR, J ustice September 25, 2008 B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d C ar r , JJ.
No. 1229.

#### Federal Land Bank of Spokane et al. *v.*Beecher.

June 10, 1946.

*C.*D. *Randall*and *Josef.Bwmond*for petitioners.

Respondent *pro se.*

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

| If to Employer: Oxis International, Inc.468 N. Camden Drive, 2nd FloorBeverly Hills, California  90210Facsimile: (310) 551-4021E-mail:  tcataldo@oxis.comAttention:   Chief Executive Officer |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| If to Executive:                                                                                                                                                                                                            |

----

|   | “EMPLOYER” Oxis International, Inc.  By:     /s/ Anthony J. Cataldo                                                         Anthony J. CataldoChief Executive Officer |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | “EMPLOYEE”  /s/ Bernard Landes            Bernard Landes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |

----

----

----

| Dated:               ___________________, 20__ |  Bernard Landes |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|

----
Order entered September 18, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00869-CR

ALEXIA REYES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-33196-R

ORDER

On September 17, 2018, court reporter Anne Meredith filed the supplemental reporter’s 

record of the April 25, 2018 revocation hearing.

We GRANT appellant’s September 13, 2018 motion for extension of time to file her 

brief and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before October 17, 2018.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
j ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 22-0571 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TRISTAN MICHAEL LANGFORD, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER 

Counsel for Appellant Tristan Michael Langford filed a motion and brief asking to 

be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find 

any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders v. 

Califbrnia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). This Court granted Langford time to 

respond, but no response was filed. 

The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), 

MCA, and Anders. We conclude no arguments with potential legal merit can be raised on 

direct appeal. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to 

Langford personally. 

DATED this , L —day of July, 2024. 

FILED 

JUL 1 6 2024 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana 

Chief Justice 

07/16/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0571
alAi 1.1..J. 

:812--. eel.... 

Justices 

2
Directors' Compensation



 Exhibit 10.5 
 Directors’ Compensation 
 All non-employee directors of the Bank and Trust Company receive $400 and $250, respectively, for each board
meeting they attend. The non-employee directors of the Bank and Trust Company receive $150 for each committee meeting they attend. In addition, non-employee directors of the Bank and Trust Company are paid an annual retainer fee of $8,000 and
$3,000, respectively, except that directors serving on the Bank board who also serve on the Trust Company board receive an additional $1,000 instead of $3,000 annual retainer for serving on the Trust Company board. In addition, the Chairman of the
Audit Committee of the Company Board is paid an additional $2,000 retainer fee. All Company directors have been elected as directors of the Bank, but there is no assurance that this practice will continue. However, not all Company directors serve as
directors of the Trust Company. There are no additional fees paid for being a Company director. 
 The Company also pays for all directors and their spouses
to attend regular director seminars. 
 Non-employee directors were eligible to receive non-qualified stock options under the Company’s 1998 Stock
Option Plan, although that plan expired on March 9, 2008, and no further awards may be granted under the plan.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis ZAMORA-MAGDALENO, also known as Roberto Madero-Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10918

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 30, 2008.

Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Sherylynn Ann Kime-Goodwin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District *665of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Zamora-Magdaleno raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Price, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 518]

*1294Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra, Lunn, Fahey and Green, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 EXHIBIT 23(a)


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 
33-64451 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 33-61087 on Form S-3 of 
our report dated March 7, 1996 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and 
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability to continue 
as a going concern) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oxis 
International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1995.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

March 28, 1996

                                77
FORM 10-Q

                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                          Washington, DC      20549

       [X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                       SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

      or the quarterly period ended July 2, 2000

                                     OR

       [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

           For transition period from            to
                                      ---------     --------
                       Commission file number  333-40933
                       -------------------------------
                             THE KRYSTAL COMPANY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                 TENNESSEE                        62-0264140
                 ---------                        ----------
    (State or other jurisdiction of      (IRS Employer identification
 incorporation or organization)             Number)

              One Union Square, Chattanooga, TN   37402
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

                         (423) 757-1550
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

    Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all
    reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
    (or for such shorter period that Registrant was required to file
    such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
    for the past 90 days.

               YES  X                     NO
                   ----                       ----

This report is filed by the Company pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  The Company has 100 shares of common
stock outstanding held of record by Port Royal Holdings, Inc. as of
August 11, 2000.





             THE KRYSTAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
             ----------------------------------
                        SIGNATURES
                        ----------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.




                         THE KRYSTAL COMPANY
                         (Registrant)

Dated: 08/11/00          /s/Larry D. Bentley
---------------          ------------------------
                         Larry D. Bentley
                        (Vice President and Chief Financial
                         and Accounting Officer)
Advance copies of this statement are made available to the
press under lock-up conditions with the explicit
understanding that the data are embargoed until 8:30 a.m.
Eastern Daylight Time.


                        Statement of
                              
                          Lois Orr
                     Acting Commissioner
                 Bureau of Labor Statistics
                              
                    Friday, July 5, 2002


     The unemployment rate was 5.9 percent and nonfarm
payroll employment stood at 130.7 million in June, little
changed from May.  The labor market has been in a holding
pattern in recent months, with nonfarm payroll employment
essentially flat since February and no significant change in
the unemployment rate since April.  Although the number of
unemployed has not changed significantly in the past 2
months, long-term unemployment has continued to climb.

     There were 8.4 million unemployed persons in June,
about the same number as in the prior month, but
approximately 2 million more than a year earlier.  The
unemployment rate, at 5.9 percent, was little changed over
the month.  Among the jobless, the number of persons
unemployed for 15 weeks or more rose to 3.1 million, nearly
double the number of such persons in June 2001.

     Nonfarm payroll employment was essentially unchanged in
June (+36,000).  Within the services division, health
services added 34,000 jobs over the month, primarily in
hospitals.  Employment in help supply services was basically
flat in June, following 3 consecutive monthly increases.
Engineering and management services shed 21,000 jobs,
erasing the gains in this industry over the previous 3
months.
     
     Manufacturing employment edged down by 23,000 in June,
about in line with losses posted in the prior 2 months.
Although employment in the industry continued to decline,
losses have moderated in recent months.  From the start of
the recession (March 2001) through January 2002, the average
monthly employment decline was 115,000.  In February and
March, losses averaged 63,000 per month; from April through
June, they averaged 24,000 per month.  The manufacturing
workweek increased by two-tenths of an hour to 41.1 hours in
June, the highest level since January 2001.  Factory
overtime also increased over the month, edging up one-tenth
of an hour to 4.3 hours.
     
     Average hourly earnings for production or
nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls were up
by 6 cents over the month to $14.76.  Over the year, average
hourly earnings increased by 3.3 percent.
     
     In summary, data from both the establishment and
household surveys showed little change in June, continuing
the pattern of recent months.  Although none of the major
industry groups has shown substantial employment growth, the
large job losses that characterized much of 2001 have
abated.