alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          47
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  35040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             35087
<PP&E>                                       29645
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               64732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       334788
<BONDS>                                      44472
<COMMON>                                      9961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (324489)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 64732
<SALES>                                      89638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             89638
<CGS>                                        27880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                27880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            145513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (83755)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)

                                       24
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
#### Ralph Gallo, Respondent, v Midstate Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[853 NYS2d 519]

Fresent-Hurlbutt, J.P., Centra, Lunn, Fahey and Fine, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21(a)

                    Subsidiaries of OXIS International, Inc.

  As of December 31, 2000, the Company's subsidiaries were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     Name                             Jurisdiction of incorporation
     ----                             -----------------------------
     <S>                              <C>
     OXIS Health Products, Inc.               Delaware
     OXIS Therapeutics, Inc.                  Delaware
     OXIS International S.A.                  France
     OXIS Acquisition Corporation             Delaware
     OXIS Isle of Man Limited                 Isle of Man
     OXIS Instruments, Inc.                   Pennsylvania
     OXIS International (UK) Limited          England
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant toSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does herebycertify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period endedJanuary 3, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended January 3, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 19, 2010 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10195 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

NATHAN BRYANT COOPER , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CR

- 151

- 27

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Nathan Bryant Cooper has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cooper has filed a response. T he record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Cooper ’s claims of ine ffective assistance of counsel; w e therefore decline to consider the claims without

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 10, 2016 Lyle W. Cay ce Clerk Case: 16-10195 Document: 00513755386 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2016No. 16

- 10195

2 prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Cooper ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the moti on for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 16-10195 Document: 00513755386 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2016
EXHIBIT 32.2



















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.  § 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I John W. Hlywak, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:









1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










By:
/s/ John W. Hlywak, Jr.John W. Hlywak, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer





November 9, 2010
NO. 07-06-0074-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

JULY 24, 2006

______________________________

MARIA DIAZ, APPELLANT

V.

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 92,456-B; HONORABLE JOHN BOARD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Maria Diaz perfected an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of appellee

Southwest Airlines Co. in her negligence suit against it. The parties have filed an agreed

motion asserting they have entered a settlement agreement. The motion requests this

court set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case

to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. This

disposition is authorized by Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B) and 43.2(d).

Finding the motion complies with the requirements of Rules 6.6 and 42.1(a), we vacate the
2

judgment of the trial court and remand for rendition of judgment in conformity with the

parties’ agreement.

Having disposed of this appeal at the parties’ express request, we will not entertain

a motion for rehearing and our mandate shall issue forthwith.

Per Curiam
EXHIBIT 11

            COMMERCE GROUP CORP. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
            --------------------------------------------------

             SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


                                           Years Ended March 31
                                    2005           2004           2003
                                    ----           ----           ----

BASIC/DILUTED
-------------

Net income (loss) for primary
 income per common share        $  (229,936)   $  (237,790)  $   (232,647)
                                ============   ============  =============
Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding
 during the year -
 basic/diluted                   22,581,814     21,089,812     18,907,958
                                ============   ============  =============

Income (loss) per common
 share - basic/diluted          $    (.0102)   $    (.0113)  $     (.0123)
                                ============   ============  =============
Exhibit
3.4






STATE
OF DELAWARE


CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT


OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED


CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION





EXPRESS SCRIPTS,
INC.





a
corporation organized and existing under a by virtue of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware.





DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY:





FIRST:That at a
meeting of the Board of Directors of Express Scripts, Inc., held on February 21,
2008, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring
said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said
corporation for consideration thereof.  The resolution setting forth
the proposed amendment is as follows:





RESOLVED, that the first
paragraph of Article 4 of the Express Scripts, Inc. Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation is amended to be and read as follows:





“The
total number of shares of stock which the Corporation has authority to issue is
1,005,000,000 shares, of which (i) 5,000,000 shares are preferred stock, par
value $0.01 per share (the “Preferred Stock”), and (ii) 1,000,000,000 shares are
common stock, par value $0.01 per share.”





SECOND:That
thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, an annual meeting
of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held upon notice in
accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute
were voted in favor of the amendment.





THIRD:That
said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.





FOURTH:  That the
capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under or by reason of said
amendment.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said
Express Scripts, Inc. has caused this certificate to be signed by George Paz,
Chief Executive Officer, an Authorized Officer, this 28th day of May,
2008.




By:
              /s/ George
      PazAuthorized
      OfficerTitle:
              Chief
      Executive OfficerName:
              George
      Paz
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 345 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 345

  Extending condolences to the family, friends, and loved ones of the 
                   late David Christopher Kelly, PhD.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2003

   Mr. McDermott (for himself, Mr. George Miller of California, Mrs. 
Tauscher, and Mr. Frost) submitted the following resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Extending condolences to the family, friends, and loved ones of the 
                   late David Christopher Kelly, PhD.

Whereas Dr. David Kelly contributed his expertise in microbiology to the 
        Government of the United Kingdom as a scientific advisor to the 
        Proliferation and Arms Control Secretariat of the United Kingdom's 
        Ministry of Defence;
Whereas Dr. David Kelly's courageous work for the United Nations Special 
        Commission (UNSCOM), which between 1991 and 1998 was charged with 
        dismantling Iraq's banned chemical, biological, and ballistic programs, 
        earned him the great respect of world arms control experts and made the 
        world safer for us all;
Whereas Dr. David Kelly had a leading role in the inspections of Russian 
        biological warfare facilities until 1994 under the 1992 trilateral 
        agreement between the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and 
        Russia and aided in reducing the danger of biological weapons in Russia;
Whereas Dr. David Kelly's professional life was characterized by his integrity, 
        honor, and dedication to finding the truth; and
Whereas David Kelly will be deeply missed by his loving wife Janice, and his 
        three daughters Sian, Rachel, and Ellen: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives, on behalf of the 
American people, extends its deepest condolences to the family, 
friends, and loved ones of the late David Christopher Kelly.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINACIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10QSB FOR
OPTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1999 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         130,939
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  678,583  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    660,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,537,292
<PP&E>                                       1,328,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                (973,874)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,910,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,254,994
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,462,604
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,910,817
<SALES>                                      1,860,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,860,053
<CGS>                                        1,077,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,077,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               887,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,926 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (126,938)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (126,938)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (126,938)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
|                                      Dated: |         February 25, 2008 |   | /s/      RICHARD L. HAWLEY                                |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                   |                                |   | Richard      L. Hawley                                    |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                   |                                |   | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT DEC 19, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 07- 1147 8 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 06-048 19-CV- AR- S BK CYN o. 05- 4444 2- JJR -1 3 IN RE: PHI LLIP A. TAL LEY, D e b t o r .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ PHILLIP A. TALLE Y , Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant , ve rs us ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , W .M. COPPAGE, in h is o ff ic ia l c ap ac ity D ef en dants -Appe lle es .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court for the NorthernDistrict of Alabam a

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (D ec em be r 19, 200 7)2

Be fo re BL A CK , CA RN E S a nd BA RKE T T , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M: Ph ill ip A
. T al le y

appe al s th e dis tr ic t c ourt’ s gr an t of the m oti on t o di sm iss his c om pla int he f ile d a ga ins t D ef

en dants A la

ba m a D ep ar

tm en t of P ubl ic S af

ety an d W
. M. Co ppa ge . T al le y f ile d abankr

upt cy a dve rs ar y pr oc ee din g a ga ins t the D ef en dants a ft er

the y sus pe nde d hi s dr ive r’ s li ce nse be ca use of his nonpaym en t of tr af fi c tic ke ts. T al le y

a lle ge s th e D ef

en dants vio la te d hi s bankr upt cy stay by susp ending his license after his bank ruptcy petition wa s filed. The bankruptcy
co urt c onc lud ed

the tr af fi c fi ne w as ac ont inu at ionof c ri m ina l pr oc ee din gs pe rm itt ed by 11 U
. S. C. § 36 2( b) (1 ). T he dis tr ic t c ourt a ff irm ed
. A ft er

r ev ie wof the record and the parties’ briefs, we aff irm for the r easons stated in th e district
co urt’ s w el l- re as one d op ini on o f January 29, 200 7. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
10.55











Summary of Compensation for
Non-Employee Directors


Effective
January 1, 2009











Annual Board
Retainer                                                             $  50,000





Board Meeting
Fee                                                                  
 $    1,500 per meeting attended





Committee Chair Annual
Retainer


Audit/Compensation                                               $  15,000





Committee Chair Annual
Retainer


Other
Committees                                                     $  10,000





Committee Meeting
Fee                                                             $    1,500
per meeting attended





Annual Equity Grant
(1)                                                             $125,000








(1)
            Granted
      in the form Restricted Stock Units effective January 30,
      2009.  Each director received 8,760 Restricted Stock Units which
      will vest in full on December 31,
2009.
#### Brett J. BALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees, Iryna Sysenko, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-16474.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Jan. 3, 2013.

Brett J. Ball, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

Cynthia Lynn Alexander, Esquire, Litigation Counsel, Kelly Harrison Dove, Esquire, Jennifer R. Hargis, Snell *&*Wilmer, *712LLP, Donna M. Osborn, Esquire, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, Las Vegas, NV, Robin Prema Wright, Esquire, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, Newport Beach, CA, Robin Prema Wright, Esquire, Miles Wright Fin-lay & Zak, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Edward Kania, Law Office of Edward D. Kania, Las Vegas, NV, for Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Brett J. Ball appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his diversity action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and a judgment on the pleadings under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). *Berg v. Popham,*412 F.3d 1122, 1125 (9th Cir.2005). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Ball’s wrongful foreclosure and quiet title claims because Ball did not allege facts showing that he was not in default when defendants initiated non-judicial foreclosure proceedings. *See Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp.,*112 Nev. 663, 918 P.2d 314, 318 (1996) (“In a quiet title action, the burden of proof rests with the plaintiff to prove good title in himself.”); *Collins v. Union Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*99 Nev. 284, 662 P.2d 610, 623 (1983) (wrongful foreclosure claim requires allegation that a lender exercised the power of sale and foreclosed upon property when the homeowner was not in default).

The district court properly dismissed and granted judgment on the pleadings on Ball’s civil conspiracy and injunctive and declaratory relief claims after dismissing the underlying causes of action. *See, e.g., Eikelberger v. Tolotti,*96 Nev. 525, 611 P.2d 1086, 1088 (1980) (conspiracy action for damages must be based on an independent cause of action).

Ball’s contentions concerning securitization, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and defendants’ standing to pursue non-judicial foreclosure are unpersuasive.

Defendant Aztec Foreclosure Corporation’s motion for miscellaneous relief is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### De Kuyper and others *v.*Witteman and others.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

January 12, 1885.)

TMADE-MaTUC— ÍnEEINGEMENT— PllINTTNG AND SELLING IMITATION LABELS TO Turan Paeties.

.Printing and selling labels in imitation of a trade-mark, with the purpose of enabling the parties to whom the labels are sold to palm oil' their goods upon the public as the goods of the owner of the trade-mark, is a violation of the rights of such owner.

In Equity.

*Rowland Cox,*for plaintiff.

*B. B. Foster,*for defendant.

Wallace, J.

The demurrer in this case is without merits. The complainants, upon the facts shown in the bill of complaint, have a good title to their trade-mark, and a case for its protection irrespective of their statutory rights under the, registration in the patent-office. As the necessary diversity of citizenship exists between the parties, they are entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of this court.

Opon the allegations of the bill the defendants are actively engaged in assisting third persons to use the complainants’ trade-mark in violation of their fights. The mere act of printing and selling labels in imitation of the complainants’ might be innocent, and, without evi*872dence of an illicit purpose, would not be a violation of the complainants’ rights. It is otherwise, however, when this is done with the obvious purpose of enabling others by the use of the labels to palm off their goods upon the public as the goods of the complainants.

The demurrer is overruled, with costs. Defendants may answer upon payment of costs.