40020 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2017 / Notices 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 4715 (August 

2017), entitled Cased Pencils from 

China: Investigation No. 731–TA–669 

(Fourth Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 17, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17802 Filed 8–22–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1041] 

Certain Digital Television Set-Top 

Boxes, Remote Control Devices, and 

Components Thereof; Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Granting Complainants’ 

Motion for Termination of the 

Investigation Based on Withdrawal of 

the Complaint; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Corrected Order No. 16) of the 

presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) granting Complainants’ motion 

for termination of the investigation 

based on withdrawal of the complaint. 

The investigation is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Houda Morad, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–4716. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted Investigation No. 

337–TA–1041 on March 3, 2017, based 

on a complaint filed by Complainants 

OpenTV, Inc. of Mountain View, 

California; Nagra USA, Inc. of San 

Francisco, California; Nagravision SA of 

Cheseaux-sur-Lausanne, Switzerland; 

and Kudelski SA of Cheseaux-surLausanne, Switzerland (collectively, 

‘‘Complainants’’). See 82 FR 12466–67 

(Mar. 3, 2017). The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 

1337), based upon the importation into 

the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain digital television set-top boxes, 

remote control devices, and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 

6,345,389; U.S. Patent No. 7,028,327; 

and U.S. Patent No. 7,725,720. See id. 

The notice of investigation identified 

seventeen (17) Respondents 

(collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’), namely: 

(i) Comcast Corporation of Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania; Comcast Cable 

Communications, LLC of Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania; Comcast Cable 

Communications Management, LLC of 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Comcast 

Business Communications, LLC of 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and 

Comcast STB Software I, LLC of 

Wilmington, Delaware (collectively, 

‘‘Comcast’’); (ii) ARRIS International plc 

of Suwanee, Georgia; ARRIS Group, Inc. 

of Suwanee, Georgia; ARRIS 

Technology, Inc. of Horsham, 

Pennsylvania; ARRIS Enterprises LLC of 

Suwanee, Georgia; ARRIS Solutions, 

Inc. of Suwanee, Georgia; ARRIS Global 

Ltd. (formerly Pace Ltd.) of Saltaire, 

England; Pace Americas, LLC of Boca 

Raton, Florida; and Pace USA, LLC of 

Boca Raton, Florida (collectively, 

‘‘ARRIS’’); and (iii) Universal 

Electronics Inc. of Santa Ana, California; 

Gemstar Technology (China) Co. Ltd. of 

Guangzhou, China; Gemstar Technology 

(Qinzhou) Co. Ltd. of Qinzhou, China; 

and Gemstar Technology (Yangzhou) 

Co. Ltd. of Baoying, China (collectively, 

‘‘Universal Electronics’’). See id. The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations is 

also a party to this investigation. See id. 

On July 21, 2017, Complainants filed 

a motion for termination of the 

investigation based on withdrawal of 

the complaint. On July 26, 2017, the 

Commission Investigative Attorney 

(‘‘IA’’) filed a response in support of 

Complainants’ motion. Respondents did 

not oppose Complainants’ motion. On 

August 11, 2017, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID, granting Complainants’ 

motion for termination of the 

investigation. The ALJ found that 

‘‘Complainants have met the 

requirements of Commission Rule 

210.21(a)(1), and [] that good cause 

exists to grant the unopposed motion to 

terminate this investigation on the basis 

of withdrawal of the complaint.’’ See ID 

at 3. No party has filed a petition for 

review of the subject ID. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The 

investigation is terminated. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 17, 2017. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17778 Filed 8–22–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act 

On August 16, 2017, the Department 

of Justice lodged a proposed Consent 

Decree with the District Court of the 

Southern District of New York in a 

lawsuit entitled United States v. Monroe 

Iron & Metal Co., Inc. et al., Civil Action 

No. 17–6217. 

In this action the United States seeks, 

as provided under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation 

and Liability Act, recovery of response 

costs from three parties regarding the 

Port Refinery Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’) in 

the Village of Rye Brook, New York. The 

proposed Consent Decree resolves the 

United States’ claims and requires the 

Monroe Iron & Metal Co., Inc., Ocanna, 

Inc., and Southern Natural Gas 

Company, L.L.C. to pay, in aggregate, 

$151,503 in reimbursement of the 

United States’ past response costs 

regarding the Site. 

The publication of this notice opens 

the public comment on the proposed 

Consent Decree. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and should refer to 

United States v. Monroe Iron & Metal 

Co., Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 17– 

6217, D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–1142/2. All 

comments must be submitted no later 

than 30 days after the publication date 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES