alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                        SALIVA DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.
                                 MARCH 31, 2004


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350

I, Leo Ehrlich, President and Chief Financial Officer of Saliva Diagnostic
Systems, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge:

         (1)    that the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Saliva  Diagnostic
                Systems,  Inc. for the quarterly  period ended on March 31, 2004
                filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date
                hereof at File No.  0-21284 (the  "Report")  fully complies with
                the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                all material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of
                operations of Saliva Diagnostic Systems, Inc.

The foregoing  certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and is not being  filed as part of the Report or as a  separate  disclosure
document.

Dated:  June 2, 2004
                                       /s/ Leo Ehrlich
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Leo Ehrlich
                                       President & Chief Financial Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM

 

 

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on FormN-1A of our report dated November 5, 2014, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights and to the investmentportfolio appearing in Item 6 of the Form N-CSR filing of New Perspective Fund, which appearin such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Financial highlights", "Independentregistered public accounting firm" and "Prospectuses, reports to shareholders and proxy statements" in such RegistrationStatement.

 

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, California

November 28, 2014
exhibit1014.htm


     

    Exhibit
10.14

    


    LIN
TV Corp.

    Summary
of Director Compensation

    


    As
of March 16, 2009, our non-employee directors receive the following
compensation:

    


    
      
        
          
            	
                    Annual
      Cash Retainer for each non-employee director

                  	 	$	60,000	 
	
                    Additional
      annual cash retainers for:

                  	 	 	 	 
	
                    Chairman
      of the Board

                  	 	 	25,000	 
	
                    Compensation
      Committee Chairman

                  	 	 	15,000	 
	
                    Nominating
      and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman

                  	 	 	15,000	 
	
                    Audit
      Committee Chairperson

                  	 	 	20,000	 
	
                    Per
      Meeting Cash Fees:

                  	 	 	 	 
	
                    Board
      meeting attended in person

                  	 	 	1,500	 
	
                    Committee
      meeting attended in person

                  	 	 	1,000	 
	
                    Board
      meeting attended via telephone

                  	 	 	1,000	 
	
                    Committee
      meeting attended via telephone

                  	 	 	500
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28,870
<SECURITIES>                                    10,732
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,519
<INVENTORY>                                     13,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,832
<PP&E>                                          27,209
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,680
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,037
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,254
<SALES>                                         30,664<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,664
<CGS>                                           19,810<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (26)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (752)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (263)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (489)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (489)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES REVENUES FROM LICENSING OF SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES.
<F2>INCLUDES COSTS FROM LICENSING OF SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gary D. Blackford, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 11, 2011

 
| /s/   Gary D. Blackford   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Gary D. Blackford         |   |
| Chairman of the Board and |   |
| Chief Executive Officer   |   |

 

1

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Rex T. Clevenger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

Date:November 10, 2010

 
| /s/  Rex T. Clevenger                                  |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|       Rex T. Clevenger             |   |
|       Executive Vice President and |   |
|       Chief Financial Officer      |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Ipswich Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael J. Wolnik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"). In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32),
this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B)
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.


/s/ Michael J. Wolnik
---------------------------
Michael J. Wolnik
Chief Financial Officer

May 13, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARROW INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MAY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                       997
<INVENTORY>                                     82,599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               179,370
<PP&E>                                         216,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 383,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,223
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,661
<OTHER-SE>                                     233,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   383,013
<SALES>                                        238,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               238,608
<CGS>                                          111,652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,361
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,463
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,898
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,898
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 69 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 69

    To require that the Government give priority to payment of all 
   obligations on the debt held by the public and payment of Social 
     Security benefits in the event that the debt limit is reached.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 7, 2015

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require that the Government give priority to payment of all 
   obligations on the debt held by the public and payment of Social 
     Security benefits in the event that the debt limit is reached.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIORITIZE OBLIGATIONS ON THE DEBT HELD BY THE PUBLIC AND 
              PAYMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.

    In the event that the debt of the United States Government, as 
defined in section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, reaches the 
statutory limit, the authority of the Department of the Treasury 
provided in section 3123 of title 31, United States Code, to pay with 
legal tender the principal and interest on debt held by the public and 
the authority of the Commissioner of Social Security to pay monthly 
old-age, survivors', and disability insurance benefits under title II 
of the Social Security Act shall take priority over all other 
obligations incurred by the Government of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15247 and #15248; Kentucky Disaster Number KY-00065]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of KENTUCKY. *Dated:*
                         08/15/2017.
 DATES: Issued on: 08/15/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/16/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/15/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. *Incident:*
                     Torrential Rains, Flash Flooding and Mudslides. *Incident Period:*
                     07/23/2017. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Mason *Contiguous Counties:* Kentucky: Bracken, Fleming, Lewis, Robertson Ohio: Adams, Brown The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.500Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.750Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.610Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15247 B and for economic injury is 15248 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Kentucky Ohio. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: August 15, 2017. Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2017-17917 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit
32.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Le@P
Technology, Inc. (the Company) for the twelve month period ended December 31,
2005 (the Annual Report), I, Mary E. Thomas, Acting Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
and belief that the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 27, 2006
/s/ Mary E. ThomasMary E. ThomasActing Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                         108,382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,951
<PP&E>                                       1,742,928
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,893,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          314,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,441,199
<OTHER-SE>                                     217,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,893,939
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  371,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             146,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (371,153)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (371,153)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (371,153)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)



</TABLE>
#### Shuli DUAN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75395.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 2007 *.

Filed Jan. 3, 2008.

Patricia Vargas, Esq., Vargas & Associates, Alhambra, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*808Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Shuli Duan, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal, and request for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility finding and will uphold the IJ’s and BIA’s decisions unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. *Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 992 (9th Cir.2003). We dismiss the petition in part and deny the petition in part.

We dismiss Duan’s asylum claim, because he failed to exhaust it before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s and BIA’s denial of withholding of removal based on an adverse credibility finding. The IJ’s negative assessment of Duan’s demeanor described the physical aspects of Duan’s behavior, and is therefore supported. *See Singh-Kaur v. INS,*183 F.3d 1147, 1151 (9th Cir.1999). Duan’s testimony was inconsistent with his asylum application regarding whether he was arrested alone or with other members of his home church, regarding important details of his alleged beating by police, and regarding the conditions of his release from custody. *See Li v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 959, 962-64 (9th Cir.2004). Duan also displayed a lack of basic knowledge of his Christian religion, despite claiming to have led a Bible study group. *See Singh v. Ashcroft,*367 F.3d 1139, 1143 (9th Cir.2004). Finally, in the absence of credible testimony, Duan’s lack of corroborating evidence also undermines his claim. *See Sidhu v. INS,*220 F.3d 1085,1091-92 (9th Cir.2000).

Duan’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same testimony that the IJ and BIA found not credible, and he points to no other evidence that he could claim the IJ and BIA should have considered. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.