alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gary
D. Blackford, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Gary D. Blackford                
|Gary D. Blackford                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 12, 2005
J -S26010-19

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

v.

DENNIS MCKEITHAN

Appellant : No. 3753 EDA 2017

Appeal from the PCRA Order October 10, 2017

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0101441-1983

BEFORE: PANELLA, P.J., GANTMAN, P.J.E., and PELLEGRINI*, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, P.J.: FILED JULY 23, 2019

Dennis McKeithan appeals pro se from the order dismissing his fifth

petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA"), 42 Pa.C.S.A.

§§ 9541-9546, as untimely. Because this appeal is duplicative of an identical

appeal filed at 3752 EDA 2017, we dismiss.

This appeal, listed at 3753 EDA 2017, stems from the PCRA court's

October 10, 2017 order dismissing McKeithan's fifth PCRA petition without a

hearing pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 907. On January 18, 2019, this Court issued

a Rule to Show Cause why this appeal should not be quashed, noting that it

appeared to be identical to an appeal docketed at 3752 EDA 2017. McKeithan

responded, arguing that this appeal should not be quashed because it

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J -S26010-19

stemmed from a different order than the appeal at 3752 EDA 2017. Based

upon this assertion, the Court discharged the Rule to Show Cause.

However, upon further review, it appears both 3753 EDA 2017 and 3752

EDA 2017 stem from the October 10, 2017 order dismissing McKeithan's fifth

PCRA petition.' Additionally, McKeithan has filed duplicative briefs and argued

identical issues in each of the two cases, rendering this appeal redundant to

its counterpart at 3752 EDA 2017. Accordingly, we dismiss it. See, e.g.,

Neidert v. Charlie, 143 A.3d 384, 387 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2016) (summarily

dismissing duplicative appeal).

Appeal dismissed.

Judgment Entered.

J seph D. Seletyn,

Prothonotary

Date: 7/23/19

' McKeithan later admitted that this appeal was duplicative of the appeal listed

at 3752 EDA 2017. See Application for Relief, 3/23/18, at 2 ¶ 4.

- 2 -
**EXHIBIT 31.A****CERTIFICATION**I, James J. Cleary, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Colorado Interstate Gas Company;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:February 28, 2007       */s/ James J. Cleary* James J. Cleary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,787
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             340
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     14,695
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,747
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,782
<LOANS>                                        148,050
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,879
<DEPOSITS>                                     170,084
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                889
<LONG-TERM>                                        749
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 192,879
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,465
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  840
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    70
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,375
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,095
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,148
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,227
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (15)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,642
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,904
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,904
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.75
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,101
<LOANS-PAST>                                       184
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   104
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,177
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       77
<RECOVERIES>                                        14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,214
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               865
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            470
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL WEYMOUTH

, Appellant,

v.

VERONICA WEYMOUTH n/k/a VERONICA HOTCHKISS

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2023

- 0186

[ February 29, 2024 ]

Appeal and cross

- appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Frank Ledee , Judge; L.T. Case No. 07

- 14193 FMCE

.

Nancy W. Gregoire Stamper of Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, and Howard S. Friedman of Fischler & Friedman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Terrence P. O’Connor of Morgan, Carratt & O’Connor, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C IKLIN and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME, AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,450
<INVENTORY>                                      3,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,356
<PP&E>                                         198,366
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,871
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,441
<COMMON>                                           161
<OTHER-SE>                                    (44,438)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,422
<SALES>                                          2,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,890
<CGS>                                            2,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   345
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (442)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (29)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (413)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (413)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the three
months ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

                                        /s/ Michael W. Helser
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael W. Helser, Treasurer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

February 4, 2005

NOTE: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin, Inc.
and will be retained by Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       40
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

Weconsent to the use of our report dated February 13, 2007, with respect to thefinancial statements and schedules of XXCAL Japan, Inc. for the periods endedDecember 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006 included in the Annual Report (Form10-K) of National Technical Systems, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2007.

| /s/ Akira Wakatsuki          |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|
| BA Tokyo & Co.           |   |   |
| MEMBER OF MAZARS             |   |   |
| Certified Public Accountants |   |   |
|                         |   |   |
|                         |   |   |
| Tokyo, Japan                 |   |   |
| April 25, 2007               |   |   |

 

1

----

**INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT**

**To the Shareholders and the Boardof Directors of XXCAL Japan Inc.**

Wehave audited the accompanying balance sheets of XXCAL Japan Inc. as of December31,2006 and December 31, 2005 and the related statements of income andshareholder’s equity for each of the two years through the periods endedDecember 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, all expressed in yen. These financialstatements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based onour audits.

Wehave performed our audits in accordance with auditing standards generallyaccepted in Japan. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditto obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are freeof material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Anaudit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significantestimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financialstatement presentation We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basisfor our opinion.

Inour opinion, the financial statements referred to above expressed in yen, presentfairly, in all material respects, the financial position of XXCAL Japan Inc. asof December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the results of its operationsfor the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accountingprinciples in Japan.

|                              |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|
| /s/ BA Tokyo & Co.       |   |   |
| BA Tokyo & Co.           |   |   |
| MEMBER OF MAZARS             |   |   |
| Certified Public Accountants |   |   |
|                         |   |   |
|                         |   |   |
| Tokyo, Japan                 |   |   |
| February 14, 2007            |   |   |

 

2

----
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Leo Ehrlich, Chief Financial Officer of Saliva Diagnostic Systems, Inc.,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

      (1)   that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Saliva Diagnostic
            Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended on March 31, 2005 filed
            with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof at
            File No. 0-21284 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
            of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      (2)   that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Saliva Diagnostic Systems, Inc.


Dated:  May 13, 2005
                                       /s/ Leo Ehrlich
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Leo Ehrlich
                                       Chief Financial Officer
Filed 11/25/20 In re A.M. CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(a). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115(a).

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re A.M

., a P erson Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. B30 4707

(Los Angeles County LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Plaintiff,

v.

A.M

. , Objector an d Appellant

,

C ESAR M.,

Defendant and Respondent. Super. Ct. No. 19CCJP0 5963 )2 APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Steff Padilla , Judge Pro Tempore

. Dismissed

. Marissa Coffey, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Objector and Appellant.
Pamela Deavours , under appointment by the Court of Appea l, for Defendant and Respondent

.

________________________________

A.M . (minor) appeals a January 6, 2020 order granting father Cesar M. reunification services. Minor argued on appeal that the juvenile court erred when it failed to bypass
father’s reunification services under Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b)(10)

. On November 5, 2020, w hile minor ’ s appeal was pending, the juvenile court terminated reunification services for both parents, finding that the Departme nt of Children and Family Services had offered reasonable reunification services, and that parents’ participation was not substantial

. On November 9, 2020 , we provided the parties an opportunity to address whether we should take judicial
notice of the cou rt ’ s November 5, 2020 order terminating
reunification services and declare minor ’ s current appeal

moot. M inor filed a letter brief agreeing that the appeal was

moot. No additional letter briefs were filed.

“‘ An appeal becomes moot when, through no fault of the respondent, the occurrence of an event renders it impossible for the appellate court to grant the appellant3

effective relief. [Citations.] ’ ( In re Esperanza C. (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1054.) ” ( In re Anna S. (2010) 180 Cal.App.4th 1489, 1498.) Taking judicial notice of the
minute order entered on November 5, 2020 , (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d)), we dismiss minor ’ s appeal as moot.

RUBIN, P. J. BAKER , J. MOOR , J.
##### 



U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington DC 20549
 FORM 10-KSB/A
 (AMENDMENT NO. 1)
 x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 August 31, 2005 0-2331
 GLASSMASTER COMPANY
  South Carolina
    
    57-0283724(State of incorporation)
    
    (IRS Employer ID No.)PO Box 788, Lexington SC
    
    29071(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 803-359-2594  None   Common Stock, par value $.03 per share
 x o
 x
 $18,248,270
 o þ
   DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE




---



##### 








---



##### 



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit No.
    
    Exhibit
    
    Sequential Page No.3.1
    
    Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 1991 and incorporated
herein by reference.3.2
    
    Amended and Restated Bylaws of the company, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-K
for the year ended August 31, 1991 and incorporated herein by reference.10
    
    Amended and restated Glassmaster Company 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan,
filed as Exhibit 10 to Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31, 1993 and
incorporated herein by reference.11
    
    Computation of Earnings Per Share for
two years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, filed as
Exhibit 11 to Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference.21
    
    Subsidiaries of the Company, filed as
Exhibit 21 to Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.31.1
    
    Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer31.2
    
    Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer32.1
    
    Form 906 Certification




---



##### 



Signatures
  GLASSMASTER COMPANYBy
    
    /s/ Raymond M. Trewhella
    
    By
    
    /s/ Nathan G. Leaphart III, CPARaymond M. Trewhella, CEO
    
    
    
    Nathan G. Leaphart III, CPA, CFO(Principal Executive Officer)
    
    
    
    (Principal Financial Officer)(Principal Accounting Officer)Date June 13, 2006
    
    
    
    Date June 13, 2006
  By
    
    /s/ Stephen W. Trewhella
    
    By
    
    /s/ Raymond M. TrewhellaStephen W. Trewhella, Director
    
    
    
    Raymond M. Trewhella, DirectorDate June 13, 2006
    
    
    
    Date June 13, 2006By
    
    /s/ Stephen W. Trewhella, Jr.
    
    By
    
    /s/ Melvin L. ChavisStephen W. Trewhella, Jr., Director
    
    
    
    Melvin L. Chavis, DirectorDate June 13, 2006
    
    
    
    Date June 13, 2006
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1367

RANDALL MAY INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

and

RANDALL MAY,

Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

v.

DEG MUSIC PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant,

and

DYNASTY USA,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California

in case no. 05-CV-0894, Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Randall May International, Inc. moves without opposition for an extension of time,

until July 17, 2009, to file its response to DEG Music Products, Inc.'s motion for a stay

of proceedings in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion for an extension of time is granted.
FOR THE COURT

JUL 15 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JUL 1 5 2009

JAN HORBALY

CLERK

cc:	Dennis G. Martin, Esq.

Peter R. Afrasiabi, Esq.

s17

2009-1367	 2