alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
        CHIEF
        FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350
 
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of Dialysis Corporation of America (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the fiscal year ended December
        31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
        therein specified (the “Report”), the undersigned, Stephen W. Everett, President
        and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Don Waite, Vice President
        of
        Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of our knowledge:
  
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
        Stephen W. Everett
 ___________________________________________
 STEPHEN
        W. EVERETT, President and Chief
 Executive
        Officer
 
 /s/
        Don
        Waite
 ___________________________________________
 DON
        WAITE, Vice President of Finance and
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 
  Dated:
        August 9, 2005
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 510 

To require Senate confirmation of Inspector General of the Bureau of 

Consumer Financial Protection, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. CAPITO, Ms. 

AYOTTE, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. HELLER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. CORKER, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To require Senate confirmation of Inspector General of the 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Consumer 

5 Financial Protection-Inspector General Reform Act of 

6 2015’’, or the ‘‘CFPB-IG Act of 2015’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 510 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF INSPECTOR GENERAL. 

2 The Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 

3 is amended— 

4 (1) in section 8G— 

5 (A) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘and 

6 the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection’’; 

7 (B) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘For the 

8 purposes of implementing this section’’ and all 

9 that follows through the end of the subsection; 

10 and 

11 (C) in subsection (g)(3), by striking ‘‘and 

12 the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection’’; 

13 and 

14 (2) in section 12— 

15 (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘the Di16 rector of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

17 Protection;’’ after ‘‘the President of the Export18 Import Bank;’’; and 

19 (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘the 

20 Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection,’’ 

21 after ‘‘the Export-Import Bank,’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 4 0 8 1 0 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. S I L V E R I O M I R A N D A

- R O M A N , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 7 : 0 8

- C R

- 1 6 6 1

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , P R A D O , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t S i l v e r i o M i r a n d a R o m a n h a s m o v e d f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f

o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. M i r a n d a - R o m a n h a s n o t f i l e d a

r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o

n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o

w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n ,
a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 20 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-40810 Document: 00511086217 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
Exhibit 99.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of OXIS International, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Sharon Ellis, Chief Financial and Operations Officer of theCompany, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/ Sharon Ellis 

----
#### Carol V. STIMSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FOOD LION, LLC, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-1192.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 5, 2007.

Decided: Jan. 28, 2008.

Tamara B. Goorevitz, David A. Skomba, Franklin *&*Prokopik, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Francis A. Pommett, III, Law Offices Of Nathanson & Pommett, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Food Lion, LLC, appeals a district court judgment finding for Appellee Carol V. *537Stimson, and awarding her $279,297.02 in damages for Food Lion’s negligence. Food Lion challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, the district court’s sparse factual findings when it awarded a victory to Stimson, and the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the damages award. Finding no error, we affirm.

We directed a limited remand in order for the district court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We find the court’s factual findings and conclusions of law in its December 11, 2007 memorandum opinion are sufficient.

The district court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo. *Carter v. Ball,*33 F.3d 450, 457 (4th Cir.1994). We find there was sufficient evidence supporting the court’s findings. Based on the court’s findings that the hazard was not open and obvious and Food Lion failed to warn Stimson of the hazard, we find no error in the court’s decision not to address the issue of Stimson’s negligence. We also find no error in the award of damages. The court heard testimony from Stimson’s treating physician regarding the reasonableness and necessity of the medical bills. We also find Stimson’s testimony provided sufficient support for the award of lost wages.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 4.3




 





Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated March 14, 2013, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-186382) of Smart Trust, New
York Municipal Portfolio of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 4.







 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


March 14, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,306
<SECURITIES>                                     3,525
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,477
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,628
<INVENTORY>                                     15,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,579
<PP&E>                                          24,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,607
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,360
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,399)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,568
<SALES>                                         83,590<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,590
<CGS>                                           49,282<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,234)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,185)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.69)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES REVENUES FROM LICENSING OF SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES.
<F2>INCLUDES COSTS FROM LICENSING OF SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.40

    


    AMENDMENT
NUMBER ONE TO

    SALARY
CONTINUATION AGREEMENT

    


    This
Amendment Number One is made as of December 30, 2008, to the Salary Continuation
Agreement dated as of March 14, 2007 (the “Agreement”), by and between Southern
Community Bank and Trust and Robert L. Davis (“Executive”).

    


    1.  The
Agreement is amended by adding the following Paragraph:

    


    “7.15.   Compliance
with ESSA. To the extent that any payment under this Agreement would
constitute a prohibited parachute payment under Section 111(b)(2)(C) of the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”), the Bank agrees to pay
Executive an additional payment equal to the prohibited payment on July 1, 2012,
or if later, the earliest date when Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA no longer
prohibits such payment.  Such payment shall be made in a single lump
sum in cash, without interest.  The Executive may be entitled to
severance payments from multiple agreements and plans with the
Bank.  The Bank, it its sole discretion, shall determine which
payments shall be delayed in order to comply with
ESSA.   Notwithstanding anything in this paragraph to the
contrary, the additional amounts due under the Agreement shall not be paid if
the Treasury Department or other governmental agency issues guidance subsequent
to the date of this Agreement that would prohibit such payment.  A
prohibited parachute payment shall be interpreted in a manner that is consistent
with Notice 2008-TAAP, Notice 2008-94 and all other current or future guidance
issued  pursuant to Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA or Section 280G(e) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.”

    


    2.  No
other terms and conditions of the Agreement are affected by this
Amendment.

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written
above.

    


    
      
        	
                SOUTHERN
      COMMUNITY BANK AND TRUST

              
	 
      
	
                By:

              	
                /s/ Jeff T.
      Clark

              
	 
      	
                Jeff
      T. Clark, President

              
	 
      


      

    

    
      
        	
                EXECUTIVE

              
	 
      
	
                /s/ Robert L. Davis

              	
                (SEAL)

              
	
                Robert
      L. Davis
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-31-1998       
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998

<CASH>                                         286,173
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,886,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                   325,500
<INVENTORY>                                    14,380,906
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               31,915,065
<PP&E>                                         4,793,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,618,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,661,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,093,357
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       47,965
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,520,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,661,690
<SALES>                                        31,143,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               31,143,211
<CGS>                                          21,365,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  21,365,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,617,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             275,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,885,156
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,636,647
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,160,196
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,248,509
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .44
        


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 21, 2015 

# Order

July 21 , 2015

151429 ( 32 )

TAMARA FILAS

, P etitioner

- Appell ant

,

v

DEARBORN HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT

NO. 7

, Respondent

- Appell ee

. SC: 151429

COA: 325172

State Tenure Comm: 13

- 010933

- ED

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the petitioner

- appellant to suspend the

filing due date of her reply until the Court addresses the motion to strike is DENIED

. P etitioner

- appellant shall have seven days from the date of this order to submit a reply in

accordance with the administrative order dated June 30, 2015

.
Exhibit
      32.1














CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AND
      EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)





In
      connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Express Scripts,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006, I, George Paz,
      Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to
      the
      best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











BY: /s/
      George
      Paz


George
      Paz


Chairman,
      President and


Chief
      Executive Officer


Express
      Scripts, Inc.





Date: 
      October 24, 2006
NO. 07-02-0313-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

SEPTEMBER 5, 2002

______________________________

ANDREW MONTEMAYOR, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2001-477,579; HONORABLE DRUE FARMER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

DISMISSAL

Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and

his attorney have both signed the motion representing that appellant wishes to withdraw

his notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly,
2

having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice

Do not publish.
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

The
Board of Directors

Unilever N.V.:

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-219500) on Form F-3 and (No. 333-185299-01) on Form S-8 of Unilever N.V. of our report dated 23 February 2018, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Unilever
Group (Unilever N.V. and Unilever PLC, together with their subsidiaries) as of 31 December 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in
equity, and consolidated cash flow statements for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2017, and the related notes and the Guarantor Statements (collectively, the Consolidated Financial Statements), and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2017, which report appears in the 31 December 2017 annual report on Form 20-F of Unilever N.V.

Our report dated 23 February 2018 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Unilever Group acquired Carver Korea Co, Ltd, Mar Terra, TAZO,
Sundial, and Schmidts Naturals during November and December 2017 and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of Unilever Groups internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2017, Carver Korea Co, Ltd,
MaeTerra, TAZO, Sundial, and Schmidts Naturals internal control over financial reporting associated with approximately 7.8% of Unilever Groups total assets as at 31 December 2017 and approximately 0.17% of Unilever Groups
turnover included in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Unilever Group as of and for the year ended 31 December 2017. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Unilever Group also excluded an evaluation of the internal
control over financial reporting of Carver Korea Co, Ltd, Mae Terra, TAZO, Sundial, and Schmidts Naturals.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                          
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------
|KPMG LLP               |  |  |  |  |  | KPMG Accountants N.V.    
|London, United Kingdom |  |  |  |  |  | Amsterdam, Netherlands   
|                       |  |  | 
|/s/ KPMG LLP           |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.
|                       |  |  | 
|28 February 2018       |  |  |  |  |  |
Exhibit 3.5



CERTIFICATE OF REDUCTION

OF CAPITAL



AEROSONIC CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing
under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.



DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:



FIRST: That at a meeting of the
Board of Directors held on May 23, 1978, a resolution was duly adopted setting forth a proposed reduction of the capital of said corporation in the manner and to the extent hereinafter set forth.



SECOND: That pursuant to the provisions of Section 244 of The General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware a reduction of the capital of the corporation by the amount of Five hundred forty three thousand eight hundred sixty four dollars ($543,864) was authorized in the following manner:



Additional Paid-In Capital reduced by $543,864



THIRD: That the assets of the corporation remaining after such reduction are
sufficient to pay any debts, the payment of which has not been otherwise provided for.



FOURTH: That this Certificate of Reduction of Capital shall be effective on January 31, 1978.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said AEROSONIC CORPORATION has caused this certificate to be signed by Herbert J. Frank, its President, attested by David S. Goldman,
its Secretary, this 31 day of May, 1978.





|        |  |                      |  | AEROSONIC CORPORATION
|------- |  | -------------------- |  | ---------------------
|        |  |                      |  |                      
|        |  |                      |  |                      
|        |  |                      |  |                      
|ATTEST: |  |                      |  |                      
|        |  |                      |  |                      
|By      |  | /s/ David S. Goldman |  |                      
|        |  | Secretary            |  |
ex10-33.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
10.33

    


    


    Joinder
Agreement

    For

    Tim
Sullivan

     

    The
undersigned hereby agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of the
Employment Security Plan of Internap Network Services, Inc., dated as of
November 14, 2007, as if he or she initially had executed such Plan as a party
thereto, and, without by implication limiting the foregoing, agrees to each
acknowledgment, covenant and other agreement contained therein.

    


    Notwithstanding
the provisions of the Employment Security Plan, the Applicable Multiple for a
Qualifying Termination During a Protection Period listed on Schedule B shall be
two (2).

    


    


    
      	 
      	
              /s/ Tim Sullivan

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Tim
      Sullivan

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              November 13, 2007

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Date

            	 
      


    

     

    Accepted:

    INTERNAP
NETWORK SERVICES, INC.

     

    
      	
              By:

            	
              Eric Suddith

            	 
      
	
              Its:

            	
              VP of Human Resources

            	 
      
	
              Date:

            	
              November 13, 2007