alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
     John W. Hlywak, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
     pursuant to 18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           2. The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company.



                               /s/John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  May 11, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2081

PERNORRIS TAYLOR, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LARRY G. MASSANARI, Commissioner of Social

Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-714-3)

Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 13, 2002

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pernorris Taylor, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; George G.

Davidson, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Pernorris Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for failure to

file a more definite statement as instructed by the magistrate

judge’s prior order. Because Taylor may be able to proceed with

this action by amending his complaint by filing a more definite

statement, the dismissal order is not final and thus is not subject

to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local

Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,149,598
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,790,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                    88,596
<INVENTORY>                                  6,299,388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,730,714
<PP&E>                                      14,758,451
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,171,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,317,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,585,219
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,169
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,638,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,317,382
<SALES>                                     13,550,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,129,121
<CGS>                                        9,973,474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,110,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,013,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                18,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,044,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                   313,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            730,899
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   730,899
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


<TABLE>

Parents and Subsidiaries of Registrant
<S>                                              <C>
                                                 State or Country
              Name of Company                      of Corporation

Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company	Delaware
	Companies included in consolidation - all
	100% owned by Parent Company:
Northwestern Flavors, Inc.	Illinois
L. A. Dreyfus Company	Delaware
Four-Ten Corporation	Illinois
Amurol Confections Company	Illinois
Wrigley Enterprises, Inc.	Delaware
The Wrigley Company Pty. Limited	Australia
Wrigley Austria Ges.m.b.H.	Austria
Wrigley Bulgaria EOOD	Bulgaria
Wrigley Canada	Canada
Wrigley (Cayman) Ltd.	Cayman Islands
Wrigley Chewing Gum Co. Ltd.	People's Republic of China
Wrigley Taiwan Limited	Republic of China
Wrigley Zagreb d.o.o.	Croatia
Wrigley s.r.o.	Czech Republic
The Wrigley Company Limited	England
Wrigley France SNC	France
Wrigley GmbH	Germany
Wrigley B.V.	Holland
Wrigley Europa B.V.	Holland
The Wrigley Company (H.K.) Limited	Hong Kong
Wrigley Hungaria, Kft.	Hungary
Wrigley India Private Limited	India
Wrigley Israel Ltd.	Israel
Wrigley & Company Ltd., Japan	Japan
The Wrigley Company (E.A.) Ltd.	Kenya
The Wrigley Company (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.	Malaysia
The Wrigley Company (N.Z.) Limited	New Zealand
Wrigley Philippines, Inc.	Philippines
Wrigley Poland Sp. zo.o.	Poland
Wrigley Romania Produse Zaharoase SRL	Romania
OOO Wrigley	Russia
Wrigley Slovakia, s.r.o.	Slovakia
Wrigley d.o.o.	Slovenia
Wrigley Co., S.A.	Spain
Wrigley Gida Ticaret Limited Sirketi	Turkey
Wrigley Ukraine TzoV	Ukraine
	Companies included in consolidation, which
	are owned by wholly-owned associated
	companies of the Parent Company:
	  100% owned by The Wrigley Company Limited,
	    England - Wrigley Scandinavia AB	Sweden
	  100% owned by Wrigley Scandinavia,
	    AB Sweden-OY Wrigley Scandinavia Ab	Finland
	    Wrigley Scandinavia AS	Norway
	  100% owned by The Wrigley Company Pty.
	  Limited, Australia -
	    The Wrigley Company (P.N.G.) Ltd.	Papua, New Guinea

</TABLE>



	NOTE:  The list above excludes 100% owned subsidiaries
which are primarily inactive and taken singly, or as a group, do
not constitute significant subsidiaries.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60118

Conference Calendar

 

JOHNNY O’BRYANT, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THOMAS G. TAYLOR, Warden at Bolivar County Regional

Correctional Facility; ELMORE SELLERS, Deputy Warden at

Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility; CAROL BOONE,

Classification and Offender Service, Bolivar County Regional

Correctional Facility; KAREN TANNER, Official Court Reporter,

11th Circuit District Court; AELICIA THOMAS, Attorney,

MSB # 10792; KENNETH L. THOMAS, Attorney,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:00-CV-259-D-B

--------------------

June 13, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny O’Bryant, Jr., Mississippi prisoner # 41117, appeals,

pro se, the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for

failure to state a claim. O’Bryant’s motion for appointment of

counsel is denied.

O’Bryant seeks damages, claiming the defendants violated his

rights, resulting in his false imprisonment. As O’Bryant has not
No. 01-60118

-2-

shown that either his conviction, his sentence, or his probation

revocation has been overturned, expunged, or otherwise

invalidated, the district court properly dismissed his complaint

as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87. See also

Jackson v. Vannoy, 49 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir. 1995)(Heck applied

to a probation revocation proceeding). The judgment of the

district court is affirmed.

The district court’s dismissal of O’Bryant’s complaint as

frivolous counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). 

O’Bryant is cautioned that if he accumulates three “strikes”

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in

any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or

detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. MOTION DENIED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted May 19, 2020

Decided May 19, 2020

Before

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

AMY C. BARRETT, Circuit Judge

No. 19-2100

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JAMES A. NICKELS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. 

No. 18-CR-116

William C. Griesbach,

Judge.

O R D E R

James Nickels bilked dozens of investors out of millions of dollars by making 

misrepresentations about the profitability of his business and perpetuating those 

misrepresentations by paying interest to investors using money from other investors. 

He pleaded guilty to one count of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957(a) 

and one count of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. His plea agreement 

included a broad appeal waiver. The district court sentenced him to 84 months’ 

imprisonment and three years of supervised release and ordered him to pay $3,227,138

in restitution. Nickels filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed counsel asserts that the 

appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Nickels has not responded to counsel’s motion. See CIR. R. 51(b). Counsel’s brief 

explains the nature of the case and addresses the potential issues that an appeal of this 

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 19-2100 Page 2

kind might involve. Because her analysis appears thorough, we limit our review to the 

subjects that counsel discusses. United States v. Bey, 748 F.3d 774, 776 (7th Cir. 2014).

In her brief, counsel states that she consulted with Nickels and confirmed that he

does not wish to withdraw his guilty plea, so counsel properly omits discussion of any 

arguments related to the plea’s validity. See United States v. Konczak, 683 F.3d 348, 349 

(7th Cir. 2012); United States v. Knox, 287 F.3d 667, 670–71 (7th Cir. 2002).

Counsel considers whether Nickels could challenge his sentence but correctly 

concludes that his appeal waiver would foreclose any challenge. In his plea agreement, 

Nickels waived the right “to appeal his sentence,” including the terms and length of any 

supervised release, and any fine, forfeiture order, or restitution order. An appeal waiver

“stands or falls with the underlying guilty plea,” and Nickels does not wish to challenge 

his plea, so his waiver would have to be enforced. See United States v. Zitt, 714 F.3d 511, 

515 (7th Cir. 2013). Moreover, counsel rightly rejects any argument that an exception to 

the appeal waiver could apply. See United States v. Campbell, 813 F.3d 1016, 1018 (7th Cir. 

2016). As counsel points out, Nickel’s 84-month sentence fell within the statutory 

maximums of 10 years (the money laundering count) and 20 years (the wire fraud 

count), and the court did not consider any constitutionally impermissible factors at 

sentencing.

Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and DISMISS the appeal.
#### Blair, Trustee, *v.*St. Louis, H. & K. R. Co. and others. (Greene, Intervenor.1)

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri.*

March 19, 1885.)

Mortgages — Surrender of Bonds under Scaling Arrangement—Lten for Portion of Reduced Indebtedness, for which New Bonds were not Issued.

The indebtedness of a railroad was scaled down,—old mortgage bonds were surrendered, and new issued. A creditor surrendered his bonds, and received new ones for all, except a small portion, of the reduced indebtedness to him. JSTo bond was issued for it, because no bond was issued for so small a sum. *Held,*that said creditor is entitled to a lien, equal to that of other mortgage creditors, for the whole amount due him.

Exceptions to Master’s Report.

*Theo. G. Case,*for complainant.

*John O’Grady,*for receiver.

*Fogg & Hatch*and *James Carr, tor*intervenor.

1

 Reported by Benj. P. Rex, Esq., of the St. Louis bar.

Brewer, J., *(orally.)*

In the case of *Greene*against *The Railroad*this state of facts is presented: It appears that this gentleman held at one time, I think, $20,000 of bonds. (I may not have the figures correctly.) The indebtedness was sealed down, and new bonds were issued. He surrendered his old bonds, and received new bonds for a portion of that amount; but there was a fraction over, $500 or $600, and no bonds apparently issuing for that limited sum, he holds that claim unadjusted, or rather unsecured by a bond. The master has allowed this as a claim against the company, but holds that it is inferior to the mortgage,—this new mortgage that was created at the time the debt was scaled down. In that, we think he is mistaken; that as Mr. Greene held the amount of the original indebtedness— $20,000—as a prior and secured debt, and surrendered it for the mere purpose of having the indebtedness scaled down, he is entitled for all of the reduced obligation to come in with the present bondholders on the same standing; that although he has an amount here of $500, —not enough to make a full bond,—yet his debt in equity stands on the same footing as that of those who have received bonds. So in that respect the exception will be sustained, and the debt will be held to be of equal lien with the mortgage debt, and paid out of the proceeds of the sale, the same as the other mortgage obligations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          58,545
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,920,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (748,600)
<INVENTORY>                                    400,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,943,743
<PP&E>                                      17,515,245
<DEPRECIATION>                              (6,115,845)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,221,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,094,077
<BONDS>                                      3,738,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        313
<COMMON>                                         6,732
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,321,060
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,798,029
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,807,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               586,326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,392,790
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                503,858
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,703,807)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.00)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


                         SALIVA DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.
                                  JUNE 30, 2002


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350

I, Leo  Ehrlich,  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of Saliva  Diagnostic
Systems, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge:

         (1)           that  the  Quarterly   Report  on  Form  10-Q  of  Saliva
                       Diagnostic  Systems,  Inc. for the quarterly period ended
                       on June 30, 2002 filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
                       Commission  on the date hereof at File No.  0-21284  (the
                       "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
                       13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
                       Act of 1934; and

         (2)           that  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly
                       presents,   in  all  material  respects,   the  financial
                       condition and results of operations of Saliva  Diagnostic
                       Systems, Inc.

The foregoing  certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and is not being  filed as part of the Report or as a  separate  disclosure
document.

Dated:  March 5, 2004
                                       /s/ Leo Ehrlich
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Leo Ehrlich
                                           President & Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF THE COMPANY AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 INCLUDED IN THE 10QSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10QSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000886093
<NAME> VIKING CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,988
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,161
<PP&E>                                         125,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          919,219
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,091
<OTHER-SE>                                   (788,862)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,714
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               291,957
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (306,737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (306,737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (306,737)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NATIONAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, INC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ending January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raffy Lorentzian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge:



Dated: April 30, 2010



/s/ RAFFY LORENTZIAN Raffy Lorentzian, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1

                                                                         Reg S-K
                                                                        Item 601
                                                                      Exhibit 23
                                                                     Page 1 of 1





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements 
of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-50989), Form S-3 (File No.
33-58983), and Form S-3 (File No. 33-60855) of our reports dated March 8,
1996, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 1995.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Omaha, Nebraska
March 26, 1996
Exhibit 99.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kennedy-Wilson, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, William J. McMorrow, Chief Executive Officer and Freeman A. Lyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|       | /s/ WILLIAM J. MCMORROW | 
|------ | ----------------------- | 
|       |                         | 
|Name:  | William J. McMorrow     | 
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date:  | May 15, 2003            | 

|       | /s/ FREEMAN LYLE        | 
|------ | ----------------------- | 
|       |                         | 
|Name:  | Freeman A. Lyle         | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date:  | May 15, 2003            |