alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.3**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Wehereby consent to the use of our report dated April 23, 2007, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of NQA, Inc. for the years ended January31,2007 and 2006, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of NationalTechnical Systems, Inc. for the years ended January 31, 2007 and 2006.

| /s/ Pannell Kerr Forster PC |   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|
| Boston, Massachusetts       |   |   |
| April 23, 2007              |   |   |

 

1

----

**Report of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

Tothe Board of DirectorsNQA, Inc.

Wehave audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of NQA, Inc. (the “Company”)as of January 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations and retained earnings, and cash flows for the years then ended.These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements basedon our audits.

Weconducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that weplan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether thefinancial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesexamining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures inthe financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accountingprinciples used and significant estimates made by management, as well asevaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that ouraudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Inour opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above presentfairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of NQA,Inc. as of January 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and itscash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principlesgenerally accepted in the United States of America.

| /s/ Pannell Kerr Forster PC |   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|
|                        |   |   |
| April 23, 2007              |   |   |

 

2

----
#### Ronnie MULLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Richard Ramirez; E. Mace; Mark Dib; Salvatore Lanase; Karen Lambright; Janet Bunts, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 07-7361.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 25, 2008.

Ronnie Mullins, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia; William Eugene Galeota, Steptoe & Johnson, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Mullins appeals the district court’s order adopting the report of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Mullins’ complaint asserting deliberate indifference to medical needs and medical negligence pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of*
      *524
      *Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Mullins v. United States,*No. 1:06-cv00105, 2007 WL 2471117 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 30, 2007). We deny Mullins’ motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 38905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17258]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10496--Vantage Point Bank, Horsham, Pennsylvania

    Notice is Hereby Given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for Vantage Point Bank, Horsham, 
Pennsylvania (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its receivership 
for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Vantage Point 
Bank on February 28, 2014. The liquidation of the receivership assets 
has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in 
accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend 
payment to proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: August 10, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17258 Filed 8-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          58,823
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,553
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,904
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     98,225
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         284,589
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           274,894
<LOANS>                                      2,529,493
<ALLOWANCE>                                     24,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,020,721
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,922,008
<SHORT-TERM>                                   589,618
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             52,796
<LONG-TERM>                                    241,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,123
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,020,721
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 47,359
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,683
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   379
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                54,421
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              21,858
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,840
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,581
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      185
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,071
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,071
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,985
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.77
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,707
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   144
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,330
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,404
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      221
<RECOVERIES>                                        36
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               24,404
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            24,404
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         23,698


</TABLE>
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard D. Rodekohr, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Northwest PipelineCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 12, 2004        By:  /s/  Richard D.Rodekohr   Richard D. Rodekohr    Vice President and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KEITH BYRD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-1936

[October 19, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Barry M. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502009CF014532A.

Jonathan R. Kaplan of Jonathan R. Kaplan, LLC, West Palm Beach, for 

appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine 

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Daniel R. McDonell, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Jewett Cameron Trading Company Ltd..;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:

August 31, 2006

By:

/s/ Daniel R. McDonell

Daniel R. McDonell,

Chief Financial Officer

|
|
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 27, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Peter L. Lynch
|Peter L. Lynch    
|                  
|August 27, 2007
OF TEXAS 

.AUSTXN. ‘l%XAS 78711 

Honorable Carol S. Vance 

District Attorney 

Harris County. Courthouse 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Dear Mr. Vance: 

Opinion No. H-1058 

Re: Whether a list of "known 

shoplifters" can be circulated. 

You have requested our opinion regarding the circulation 

of a list of "known shoplifters" by a retail merchants association. 

Prior to 1974, the Texas Penal Code prohibited the circulation of "any malicious statement affecting the reputation 

of another" which conveyed the idea that the accused was guilty 

of a penal offense or was "notoriously of bad or infamous character." Former Penal Code arts. 1269;. 1275(4). The criminal 

libel laws were omitted, however, from the present Penal Code. 

Thus, no portion of the Penal Code would appearto prohibit a 

retail merchants association from circulating a list of persons suspected of shoplifting. Neither are the blacklisting 

or anti-discrimination statutes, articles 5196-5207b, V.T.C.S., 

applicable to ,such a situation, since they apply only to employees or former employees. 

On the other hand, to accuse falsely any person of criminal 

conduct~might be viewed by a court as libelous per se under the 

Texas libel statute, article 5430, V.T.C.S., so as to give rise 

to a civil action'for damages. Be10 v. Fuller, 19 S.W. 616, 

617 (Tex. 1892); Hornby v. Hunter, 385 S.W.Zd 473, 475-76 (Tex. 

Civ. App. -- Corpus Christi 1964, no writ). See Annot., 29 

A.L.R.3d 961 (1970); ~Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S:693, 697 (1976) 

(injury to one's reputation by state officials does not violate 

the Fourteenth Amendment but would appear to give rise to a 

state claim for defamation). Accordingly, it is our opinion 

that, although circulation of a list of "known shoplifters" by 

a retail merchant association would violate no provision of 

state penal law, it might give rise to.a civil action for 

defamation if it can be shown that the characterization was 

false. 

P. 4347 
. 

Honorable Carol, S. Vance - Page 2 (H-1058) 

SUMMARY. 

Although,the circulation of a list of 

"known shoplifters" by a retail merchants 

associations would appear to violate no 

provision of Texas penal law, it might 

gives rise to. a civil action for damages 

on the basis.of either libel or invasion 

of,privacy if it can be shown that the 

characterization was false. 

N L. HILL 

torney General of Texas 

APPROVED: 

c. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

jst 

p. 4348
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 19

- 00672

- CR

IN RE John CERDA

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 16, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On October 2, 2019, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in which relator

seeks to compel the Board of Pardons and Paroles to annul or vacate its September 10, 2019

“denial” order. This court’s mandamus jurisdiction does not extend to the Board of Pardons and

Paroles. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221(a), (b). Therefore, we dismiss his petition for want of

jurisdiction. Relator also filed a “Request for Publi cation,” asking us to publish this opinion. We

deny the request.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

1 This proceeding arises from a parole panel decision by the State of Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50341 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAUL SALGADO-RAMOS, also known as Sergio Vasquez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1855

-------------------- Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Raul SalgadoRamos raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 345 

To limit the level of premium subsidy provided by the Federal Crop Insurance 

Corporation to agricultural producers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2015 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself and Mr. TOOMEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To limit the level of premium subsidy provided by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation to agricultural producers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF PORTION OF 

4 PREMIUM BY CORPORATION. 

5 Section 508(e) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 

6 U.S.C. 1508(e)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(9) LIMITATION.— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 345 IS

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any 

2 other provision of this title, the total amount of 

3 premium paid by the Corporation on behalf of 

4 a person or legal entity, directly or indirectly, 

5 with respect to all policies issued to the person 

6 or legal entity under this title for a crop year 

7 shall be limited to a maximum of $50,000. 

8 ‘‘(B) RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAW.—To 

9 the maximum extent practicable, the Corpora10 tion shall carry out this paragraph in accord11 ance with section 1001 of the Food Security 

12 Act of 1985 (7 U.S.C. 1308).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS