alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6526

JOHNNY LEE ROBBINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FRANKLIN FREEMAN; J. V. TURLINGTON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-96-762-5-F3)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 16, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Lee Robbins, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robbins v. Freeman, No. CA-96-762-5-F3 (E.D.N.C. Mar.

25, 1997). Further, we deny Appellant's motion for transcripts at

government expense and his motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51165

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CESAR OMAR CASTRO-SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-500-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit

Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cesar Omar

Castro-Sanchez raises arguments that are foreclosed by United

States v. Esparza-Gonzalez, 268 F.3d 272, 273-74 (5th Cir. 2001),

which held that the district court’s failure to verify that the

defendant and his counsel had read and discussed the presentence

report did not require an automatic reversal. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alaina RIGGINS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10546

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 15, 2013.

Peter J. Sholl, Robert E. O’Neill, Thomas Nelson Palermo, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Grady Charles Irvin, Jr., Irvin Law Firm, LLC, Tampa, FL, Alaina Nichole Riggins, USP Coleman II, Coleman, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before MARCUS, JORDAN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

*870PER CURIAM:

Grady C. Irvin, appointed counsel for Alaina Riggins in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 788, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Riggins’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF THE COMPANY AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 INCLUDED IN THE 10QSB AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10QSB
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000886093
<NAME>                        VIKING CAPITAL GROUP, INC

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                   15372
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           204600
<ALLOWANCES>                                            124222
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         95750
<PP&E>                                                  952176
<DEPRECIATION>                                          157899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          975056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  1729091
<BONDS>                                                   5886
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                 34264
<OTHER-SE>                                             (725657)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            975056
<SALES>                                                   2674
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         34481
<CGS>                                                    13366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           714351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         (3665)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      (13861)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (710761)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (710761)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (710761)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (.022)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.022)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-102824) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-36602, 33-36603, 33-57913, 33-61347, 333-09261, 333-32675, 333-60031, 333-60033, 333-83973, 333-42478, 333-65990, 333-97277,
333-107855, 333-107856, 333-109952, 333-114803 and 333-138004) of Wendys International, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

|                          
|--------------------------
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|Columbus, Ohio            
|March 1,2007
No. 943.

#### United States *v.*Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.

April 29, 1946.

*Solicitor General McGrath*for the United States.

*Thos. W. Davis*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1313 

CA 12-01212 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

DONOVAN HUMPHREY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

 

EDWARD CAMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS,

BEN PENNETTA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

 

ATHARI & ASSOCIATES, LLC, UTICA (NICOLE C. PELLETIER OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

SLIWA & LANE, BUFFALO (STANLEY J. SLIWA OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew

A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered April 5, 2012. The order, among other

things, denied plaintiff’s motion for a protective order. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
CAPITAL WORLD BOND FUND, INC.
            333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California  90071
                         (213) 486-9200
 
January 5, 1998
 
Document Control
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
RE:  CAPITAL WORLD BOND FUND, INC.
     FILE NOS. 33-12447 AND 811-5104
                                                                             
Gentlemen:
 
     Enclosed for filing is the above-referenced Registrant's current
definitive Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.  There have been
no changes from the Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 under the
Securities Act of 1933 and Amendment No. 16 under the Investment Company Act of
1940 filed electronically on December 30, 1997.  This material is filed
pursuant to the requirements of Reg.230.497 under the Securities Act of 1933.  
   
Sincerely,
 
Julie F. Williams
 
Enclosures
 
cc:  Mr. Frank Dalton
     Mr. Bric Barrientos 
     (Division of Investment Management)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q AT MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         4,575,990
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,129,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                     421,494
<INVENTORY>                                    3,687,854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,217,139
<PP&E>                                         2,998,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,388,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12,887,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,855,561
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           9,089
<OTHER-SE>                                    19,225,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12,887,674
<SALES>                                          660,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 660,846
<CGS>                                            702,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,593,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (690,401)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               902,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,635,073)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (660,846)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,635,073)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.19)
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michael-Tony Velez, Appellant, v Dale Artus, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[856 NYS2d 891]

In 2003, petitioner was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender to an aggregate prison term of 15 years to life upon his convictions of assault in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, *1110criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree. His convictions were affirmed upon appeal *(People v Velez,*21 AD3d 262 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 760 [2005]) and his subsequent application for a federal writ of habeas corpus was denied *(Velez v Ercole,*2006 WL 2742046, 2006 US Dist LEXIS 71100 [SD NY 2006]). Thereafter, petitioner commenced the instant CPLR article 70 proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus, alleging, among other things, that the evidence presented at trial was legally insufficient to support the convictions. Supreme Court denied the application without a hearing, prompting this appeal.

We affirm. Petitioner’s claims could have been raised on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion and, thus, are not the proper subjects of a habeas corpus proceeding *(see People ex rel. King v Bennett,*45 AD3d 1015, 1016 [2007], *lv denied*10 NY3d 703 [2008]; *People ex rel. Washington v Walsh,*43 AD3d 1217, 1217 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 816 [2007]). To the extent that petitioner raises certain claims for the first time on appeal, they are not preserved for our review *(see Matter of Woodward v Selsky,*43 AD3d 1209, 1209 [2007]; *People ex rel. Persing v Lacy,*276 AD2d 815, 816 [2000]).

Peters, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 39786)    
                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 18, 2017.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City*                     (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

                    1.                     *Guaranty Bancorp, Inc., Denver, Colorado;*                     to merge with Castle Rock Bank Holding Company, and thereby indirectly acquire Castle Rock Bank, both of Castle Rock, Colorado.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 17, 2017.

Yao-Chin Chao,

Assistant Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2017-17771 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6046

MARVIN HADEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANDY WAMSLEY, Commissioner of Randolph County; WILLARD L. HERRON, Sheriff of Randolph County; TROOPER ALTON, Arresting Officer, Randolph County State Police; DOYLE, Jailor; COFFMAN, Jailor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-2-2) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marvin Haden, Appellant Pro Se. Bridgette Rhoden Wilson, BUSCH & TALBOTT, Elkins, West Virginia; Michael Kozakewich, Jr., STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haden v. Wamsley , No. CA-97-2-2 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 18, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 13, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00118

- CV

Shirlely ADAMS , Charlene Burgess, Willia Mae Herbst Jasik, William Albert Jasik, and R. May Oil & Gas Company, Ltd., Appellant s

v. Murphy Exploration & Production

MURPHY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION CO.

- USA , A Delaware Corporation, Appellee s

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 05

- 0466

- CVA Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to Wednesday, May 13, 2015.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________

KEIT H E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Mary A. Keeney

PO Box 98 Austin, TX 78767

- 0098

Jason Allen Newman

910 Louisiana St
Houston, TX 77002

- 4916

John B. McFarland

PO Box 98 Austin, TX 78767

- 0098 Jason Allen N ewman 910 Louisiana St Houston, TX 77002

- 4916

Macey Reasoner Stokes

One Shell Plaza
Houston, TX 77002

- 4995

Bill Kroger 910 Louisiana Street, Suite 3000
Houston, TX 77002

- 4995
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39998-39999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17818]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10503--The Freedom State Bank, Freedom, Oklahoma

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for The Freedom State Bank, Freedom, 
Oklahoma (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its receivership for 
said institution. The FDIC was

[[Page 39999]]

appointed Receiver of The Freedom State Bank on June 27, 2014. The 
liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the 
extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the 
Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: August 18, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17818 Filed 8-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 21
                             SUBSIDIARIES OF ZENITH

    Set forth below are the names of certain subsidiaries of Zenith. Certain
subsidiaries, which considered in the aggregate would not constitute a
significant subsidiary, are omitted from the listing below.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         JURISDICTION OF
                              NAME                                        ORGANIZATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------  ---------------------------
<S>                                                                <C>
Zenith Insurance Company                                                   California
CalFarm Insurance Company                                                  California
ZNAT Insurance Company                                                     California
CalFarm Insurance Agency                                                   California
Zenith Star Insurance Company                                                 Texas
Perma-Bilt, a Nevada Corporation                                             Nevada
ZIC Lloyd's Underwriting Limited                                             England
</TABLE>