alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit_10-16.htm


    Exhibit
10.16


      Amendment
to Services Agreement of Karel Huijser

      


      


      The
parties to this agreement, Karel Huijser, Tennant Company and Tennant N.V.,
hereby memorialize in writing that as of November 1, 2006, Tennant N.V. assumed
Tennant Company’s obligations under the Services Agreement between Tennant
Company and Mr. Huijser, which was dated as of 1 November 2006 (“Services
Agreement”), as a result of which Tennant N.V. became the employer under the
Services Agreement.

      


      The
takeover by Tennant N.V. was not intended to and did not change the contents of
the Services Agreement and all other terms and conditions of the Services
Agreement are not affected by this Amendment except to the extent that those
covenants made by Mr. Huijser to Tennant Company, including Section 13, “Certain
Covenants of Executive,” also apply to Tennant N.V.

      


      As drawn
up in three originals and signed in the locations and on the dates shown
below:

       

      
        
          	
                  Signed
      by Mr. Huijser

                	 	
                   

                	 	
                   

                
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  /s/
      Karel Huijser

                	 	
                  December
      17, 2008

                	 	
                  Minneaplis,
      MN

                
	
                  Karel
      Huijser

                  Vice President, International

                	 	 Date	 	 Location
	 	 	 	 	 
	 Signed
      by Tennant Company	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  /s/
      Thomas Dybsky

                	 	
                  December
      17, 2008

                	 	
                  Minneaplis,
      MN

                
	
                  Thomas
      Dybsky

                  Vice President, Administration

                	 	Date	 	 Location
	 	 	 	 	 
	 Signed
      by Tennant N.V.	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  /s/
      Heidi M. Hoard

                	 	
                  
                    
                      December
      17, 2008

                    

                  

                	 	
                  Minneaplis,
      MN

                
	
                  Heidi
      M. Hoard

                  Director

                	 	
                  Date

                	 	 Location
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00042-CR

MYCHAL WESPRIEST TROTTER,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 297th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1530103D)

May 6, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment adjudicating guilt is modified to 

delete the $257 fine and $35 of the reparations, and we delete these amounts totaling 

$292 from the order to withdraw funds as well. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1776** 

WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., and a minor JFD as next best friend , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
MICHELLE JOY JAWORSKI; MELANIE A. SHEKITA; JEFF FORD; TONY BELL; OTHER UNKNOWN UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF STATE AGENTS DEFENDANT ’ S , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 4:13

- cv - 00063

- R BS

- DEM )

Submitted : August 22, 2013 Decided: August 26, 2013

Before MOTZ, DIAZ , and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006) and ordering him to show cause why a system of prefiling review should not be imposed upon him . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 3 37 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order Davis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Davis’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## **Exhibit 31.2**

## ** **

**Certificationof the Chief Financial Officer**

(Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a))

 

I, Gary Williams, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Form 10-Q of Focus Enhancements, Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
|   | Date: August 12, 2005 |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   |                       |
|   |                       |
|   | /s/ Gary  Williams         |   |
|   |                       |
|   | Gary Williams              |
|   | VP of Finance and CFO      |
|        |                            |  |  |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40893 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaint iffAppellee,

versus JUAN CARLOS GARCIA-RAMIREZ, DefendantAppellant.

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-2330-ALL

-------------------------------------------------------------- Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juan Carlos G arcia-Ram ir ez appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry int o the Unit ed States f ollo wing deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues th at his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to properly weigh the-2-

sentencing factors set fo rth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and impo sed a term of imprisonment greater th an necessary to meet § 3553(a)’s objectives. We review the sentence impo sed fo r reasonableness. U nited States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220, 261-62 (2005). As Garcia-Ramirez was sentenced at the low end of the applicable guidelines range, and he identifies no error in the guidelines calculations, we give great deference to the sentence impo sed. See United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 519-20 (5th Cir. 2005). Contrary to Garci aRamirez’s arguments, we find th at the district court did not improperly balance the sentencing factors and the sentence impo sed was not greater th an necessary to satisfy the purposes of § 3553(a)(2). Therefore, we conclude that the 46-month sentence imposed was reasonable. Garcia-Ramirez’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatm

ent of prior felo ny and aggravated felo ny convictions as sentencing factors rather th an elements of the of

fense th at must be fo und by a jury i s fo reclosed by A lmendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Al th ough Garcia-Ramirez contends that Almendarez-Torres was inco rrectl y decided and th at a majo rity of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000) , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis th at Almendarez-Torres remains binding. S ee United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Garci a-Ramirez properl y concedes th at his argum ent is foreclosed in light of A lmendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. AFFIRMED.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 57 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to prevent the illegal trafficking of supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits by requiring 

all program beneficiaries to show valid photo identification when purchasing items with program benefits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2015 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to prevent 

the illegal trafficking of supplemental nutrition assistance 

program benefits by requiring all program beneficiaries 

to show valid photo identification when purchasing items 

with program benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Food Stamp Fraud 

5 Prevention and Accountability Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 57 IS

1 SEC. 2. PHOTO IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. 

2 (a) DISQUALIFICATION FOR USING ANOTHER EBT 

3 CARD.—Section 6 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

4 (7 U.S.C. 2015) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(t) DISQUALIFICATION FOR USING ANOTHER EBT 

7 CARD.—Subject to any requirements established by the 

8 Secretary, any person who has been found by a State or 

9 Federal court or administrative agency in a hearing under 

10 subsection (b) to have intentionally used an EBT card 

11 that was issued to a household of which the person is not 

12 a member shall be ineligible for benefits under this Act.’’. 

13 (b) OPTIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION.— 

14 Section 7(h)(9) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

15 (7 U.S.C. 2016(h)(9)) is amended by adding at the end 

16 the following: 

17 ‘‘(C) LISTED BENEFICIARIES.— 

18 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—If a State agency 

19 elects not to require that an EBT card 

20 contain a photograph described in subpara21 graph (A), the State agency shall list on 

22 the EBT card the name of each member of 

23 the household who may use the card. 

24 ‘‘(ii) PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION

25 REQUIRED.—A member of a household 

26 with an EBT card issued by a State agenVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:25 Jan 13, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S57.IS S57

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 57 IS

1 cy described in clause (i) shall be required 

2 to show photographic identification at the 

3 point of sale when using the EBT card.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 530 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 530

To require the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to be 
 appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the 
                                Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 23, 2015

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to be 
 appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the 
                                Senate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK GOVERNANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 4 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 
301 through 308; 341) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(25) Selection of the president of the federal reserve 
        bank of new york.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
        section, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York 
        shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and 
        consent of the Senate, for terms of 5 years.
            ``(26) Testimony.--The president of the Federal Reserve 
        Bank of New York, on an annual basis, shall provide testimony 
        to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the 
        Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of 
        Representatives.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of enactment of this Act and apply to 
appointments for the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York 
made on and after that effective date.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
     John W. Hlywak, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
     pursuant to 18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                             /s/John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                -----------------------------
                               John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                               Chief Financial Officer
                               May 12, 2006
**Exhibit        32.1**

| (1)   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                              | BY:    | /s/ George                Paz                                   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                              |   | George                Paz                                       |   |
|                                              |   | Chairman,                President and Chief Executive Officer  |
|                                              |   | Express                Scripts, Inc.                                 |   |
|                                              |   |                                                                 |   |
| Date:                  October 24, 2007 |   |                                                                 |   |
exv10w4






EXHIBIT (10.4)




AGREEMENT




     This Agreement is entered into by and between Elmer Doty (“Executive”) and Vought Aircraft
Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Dallas, Texas
(“Vought” or the “Company”).



          Executive and Vought (the “parties”) have previously entered into an agreement, dated March
29, 2006 (the “Employment Agreement”) which provided for the initial terms and conditions of
Executive’s employment with the Company and the compensation to be provided to Executive for those
services.




          By their signatures below, the parties agree that the terms of the Employment Agreement shall
be amended as follows:




1) Paragraph 2, subsection (b) shall be amended by deleting the following
words:




“...with a maximum bonus opportunity for calendar year 2006 equal to 150% of Annual Base
Salary.”




and substituting the following words:




     “...in such amount as may be approved by the Board (or its Committee).”




2) Paragraph 2, subsection (g) shall be amended by deleting the following
words:




“...annual reimbursements for financial and tax planning, up to a maximum of $10,000 per
year...”




and substituting the following words:




     “...annual reimbursements for financial and tax planning in accordance with
plans or arrangements of the Company, as may be amended from time to time, which are
applicable to other senior officers of the Company.”


The Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged in all other respects.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Elmer L. Doty	 	Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ ELMER L. DOTY

	 	By:
	 	/s/ KEVIN P. MCGLINCHEY	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Kevin P. McGlinchey	 	 
	 

	 	Its:
	 	Vice President,
General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary	 	 
	Dated: February 13, 2007

	 	Dated:
	 	February 13, 2007
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 351 

To prevent homeowners from being forced to pay taxes on forgiven mortgage 

loan debt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2015 

Mr. HELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To prevent homeowners from being forced to pay taxes on 

forgiven mortgage loan debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage Debt Tax 

5 Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME 

7 OF DISCHARGE OF QUALIFIED PRINCIPAL 

8 RESIDENCE INDEBTEDNESS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (E) of section 

10 108(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amendVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:05 Feb 10, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S351.IS S351

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 351 IS

1 ed by striking ‘‘January 1, 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘January 

2 1, 2017’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to indebtedness discharged after 

5 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             461
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,132
<PP&E>                                       3,143,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,255,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          584,529
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,710,329
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,255,070
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  342,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (342,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (342,439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (342,439)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        


</TABLE>