alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  of Viking
Capital Group,  Inc. (the  "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  William J.  Fossen,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 14, 2002     /s/ William J. Fossen
                              ---------------------
                              William J. Fossen
                              Chief Executive Officer







                                                                              31
___________ No. 95-2045

___________ Stanley H. Preston, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Captain Brown, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, Arkansas * Department of Correction; * Lt. McGee, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, Arkansas * Department of Correction; * George W. Beers, Hearing * Appeal from the United States Officer, East Arkansas Regional * District Court for the Unit, Arkansas Department of * Eastern District of Arkansas. Correction; Robert Thorne, CO-1,* Security, East Arkansas * [UNPUBLISHED] Regional Unit, Arkansas * Department of Correction; * Michael Hall, CO-1, Security, * East Arkansas Regional Unit, * Arkansas Department of * Correction, originally sued as * "Michel Hall"; William Cross, * CO-1, Security, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, Arkansas * Department of Correction, * originally sued as "Willie * Cross," * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 5, 1996 Filed: February 9, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________
PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Stanley H. Preston, an Arkansas inmate, appeals the District Court's 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action following an evidentiary hearing. Having carefully reviewed the entire record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the judgment of the District Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION****Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,****As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the****Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**The undersigned hereby certifies that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2006 of Graphic Packaging Corporation (the “Company”) filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained insuch report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ STEPHEN M. HUMPHREY     Name: Stephen M. Humphrey  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer  May 4, 2006
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the "Company") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, as President of the Company, hereby certifies that:

                  (i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company.


Dated as of this 9th day of May 2006.


                                   /s/ John P. Amboian
                                   -----------------------------------
                                   John P. Amboian
                                   President



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-04905 and Form S-8
No. 333-67743) pertaining to the National Technical Systems, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan and the XXCAL, Inc. Stock Option Plan and in the related Prospectuses of our
report dated April 14, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of National Technical Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2003.



Woodland
Hills, California
April 28, 2003

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17544]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 2036]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 12 Under Alternative Site 
Framework; McAllen, Texas

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act (FTZ) provides for ``. . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of zones;
    Whereas, the McAllen Foreign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of Foreign-
Trade Zone 12, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-76-
2016, docketed November 10, 2016; amended June 26, 2017) for authority 
to reorganize under the ASF with a service area of Hidalgo County, 
Texas, in and adjacent to the Hidalgo/Pharr Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry, and FTZ 12's existing Sites 1 and 2 would be 
categorized as magnet sites;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (81 FR 81056-81057, November 17, 2016) and the amended 
application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The amended application to reorganize FTZ 12 under the ASF is 
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.13, to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for 
the zone, and to an ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would 
terminate authority for Site 1 if not activated within five years from 
the month of approval.

    Dated: August 11, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations, performing the non-
exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement & Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-17544 Filed 8-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Robert CoppleRobert CoppleChief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 25, 2016

NO. 03-15-00469-CR

James Michael Reser, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgments. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgments of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                           4,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,918
<INVENTORY>                                     79,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,485
<PP&E>                                         135,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,030
<BONDS>                                         61,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                     166,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,824
<SALES>                                         61,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,626
<CGS>                                           35,561
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,561
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    66
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,701)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,019)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,019)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Shi kai Bui, Chief Executive Officer and I, Patrick Lim,
Chief Financial Officer of Sun Motor International, Inc. (the "Company") certify
that:

     1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Sun Motor
International, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

Date: September 11, 2006



/s/ Shi Kai Bui
------------------------
Shi Kai Bui
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Patrick Lim
------------------
Patrick Lim
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          87,981
<SECURITIES>                                 1,221,796
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (82)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          29,903
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,936)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,365,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         37,369
<COMMON>                                         7,120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     950,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,365,727
<SALES>                                         62,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,057
<CGS>                                           50,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,142
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,483)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.85
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of OXIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), I, Steven. T. Guillen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/    STEVEN T. GUILLEN
|Steven T. Guillen       
|Chief Executive Officer 
|June 15, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kamal Fardan, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 861]

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Oneida County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, denying his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 seeking to vacate the judgment convicting him after a jury trial of, inter alia, murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]). We agree with defendant that the Justice who denied the motion was disqualified by reason of the fact he was District Attorney of Oneida County at the time of defendant’s conviction *(see*Judiciary Law § 14; *1305
      *People v Clement,*26 AD2d 968 [1966]; *People v Burgett,*15 AD2d 873 [1962]). In view of that disqualification, the court lacked jurisdiction, and its order is void *(see People v Alteri,*47 AD3d 1070 [2008]; *People v Morgan,*277 App Div 956 [1950]). We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings on defendant’s motion before a different justice. In light of our decision, we do not address the merits of defendant’s contentions on appeal. Present-Hurlbutt, J.E, Martoche, Lunn, Green and Gorski, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
     I, Jay Higham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
     18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

          1.  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company.



                                /s/Jay Higham
                                   --------------------------
                                   Jay Higham
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   May 11, 2007
#### In the Matter of: Alexis Mager LAKUSTA, Debtor, *799Alexis Mager Lakusta, Appellant, v. Mark H. Evans; et al., Appellees.

No. 08-15328.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2010.*

Filed April 20, 2010.

Alexis Mager Lakusta, Menlo Park, CA, pro se.

Kathleen J. Moorhead, Esquire, Walnut Creek, CA, James Roberts, Roberts *&*El-iott, LLP, San Jose, CA, for Appellee.

David Duperrault, and Silicon Valley Law Group, San Jose, CA, pro se.

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alexis Mager Lakusta appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to compel abandonment of certain legal claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), *Pagtalunan v. Galaza,*291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action because Lakusta failed to file his opening brief after the district court had previously explored less drastic alternatives and warned Lakusta that failure to comply with the court’s orders would result in dismissal. *See id.*at 642 (outlining factors to consider before dismissing a claim for failure to prosecute).

Lakusta’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Evans’s request for sanctions is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0457

In the Matter of 

S.G.,

an Alleged Mentally Ill Person,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 3, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 27 2024

08/27/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0457