alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.8


         


         


        January 11, 2008

         

        Re: Service about being independent director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of China Pharma Holdings, Inc

          

        Dear Mr. Yingwen Zhang

         

        On behalf of the Board of Directions and the Company, I am pleased to welcome you to join the Board of the China Pharma Holdings, Inc as an independent director and Chairman of the Audit Committee. I look forward to working with you. Your starting date will be the date of the board approves your engagement and your engagement for this term will end on the date of the next annual shareholders meeting.

          

        Your compensation will consist of the following:


        


        	
                	
                    1)     

                	
                    A retainer of RMB 40,000 per year, payable quarterly within 5 days of the start of the quarter;

                


        

        

        



        


        If you agree to the terms and conditions stated above, please sign and date this letter below.

          

        I look forward to working with you and sincerely hope that your service will be enjoyable and rewarding.

          

        Sincerely

          

         

         

        Chairman of the Board

         China Pharma Holdings, Inc

          

         

        Response:

        This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of Mr. Yingwen Zhang.

         

        By: ____________________________


        Date:___________________________
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael C. Nasser, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jewett Cameron Trading Company Ltd;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date), and

c.

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date:



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: April 14, 2004



/s/  Michael C. Nasser

Michael C. Nasser, Corporate Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4320-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-4320-DR), dated June 23, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued July 19, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

      ( print page 39891)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of June 23, 2017.

Jackson and Jefferson Counties for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-17747 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,942
<SECURITIES>                                    34,003
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,515
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196,946
<PP&E>                                           6,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          183,752
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,318
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,513
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    69
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,037
<INCOME-TAX>                                       339
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                698
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       698
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20915 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROMUALDO GARZA-GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-914-1

-------------------- October 7, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

Attorney Jonathan J. Paull, appointed to represent Romualdo Garza-Garza (“Garza”), has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garza has not responded to the motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,No. 01-20915 -2- counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

MOTION GRANTED ; APPEAL DISMISSED
.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.



By:

/s/ Robert L. Howard-AndersonName:

Robert L. Howard-AndersonTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Hugh BRYSON, Defendant (two cases).

Crim. Nos. 33630, 33559.

United States District Court N. D. California, S. D.

Nov. 25, 1953.

See also 16 F.R.D. 450.

Lloyd H. Burke, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in both cases.

Gladstein, Andersen & Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in both cases.

GOODMAN, District Judge.

The United States Attorney, at the direction of the Attorney General, seeks leave of court to file dismissals of the indictments in these cases. Rule 48(a), Fed.Rules Crim.Proc. 18 U.S.C.A. An indictment charging the same offense against the defendant is now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

It has become the duty of the Attorney General to determine in which jurisdiction the offense charged “was most probably committed, and bring the offender to trial there.” Haas v. Henkel, 1910, 216 U.S. 462, 30 S.Ct. 249, 251, 54 L.Ed. 569.

He has made such determination by requesting leave of Court to dismiss the indictments in this District. His decision in that regard appears to be based on good reason, i. e., that the offense was probably not committed in this Distiict, but was probably committed in the District of Columbia. 18 U.S.C. § 1001; 29 U.S.C.A. § 159(h); United States v. Valenti, 3 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 242; see also U. S. v. Lombardo, 1916, 241 U.S. 73, 36 S.Ct. 508, 60 L.Ed. 897.

Leave to file dismissals of the indictments is granted.
# gp18_01

# gp18_02

# gp18_03

# gp18_04

# gp18_05

# gp18_06

# gp18_07

# gp18_08

# gp18_09

# gp18_10

# gp18_11

# gp18_12

# gp18_13

# gp18_14

# gp18_15

# gp18_16

# gp18_17

# gp18_18

# gp18_19

# gp18_20

# gp18_21

# gp18_22

# gp18_23

# gp18_24

# gp18_25

# gp18_26

# gp18_b1

# gp18_b2

# gp18_b3

# gp18_b4

# gp18_b5
#### HALL v. KISH et al.

Civ. No. 27996.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

Feb. 27, 1951.

*293A. L. Ely, Albert L. Ely, Jr., and Ely & Frye, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

John Ruffalo, John Ruff alo, Jr., Youngstown, Ohio, for defendant.

JONES, Chief Judge.

In this action plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring (1) that defendants’ patent is not infringed by articles manufactured and sold by plaintiff, (2) that said patent is invalid and void, and asking certain injunctive relief.

Defendants in their answer merely deny the allegations made in the complaint, and ask only that the complaint be dismissed.

Defendants, however, have filed a demand • for jury trial, and plaintiff moves to strike this demand.

 Even though this is a declaratory judgment action, defendants are entitled to a jury trial if such is provided for in Rules 38 and 39. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 57, 28 U.S.C.A. However, it is quite clear that a party may demand a jury trial in accordance with Rules 38 and 39, only if the action before enactment of these rules was triable to a jury. Equitable actions are still tried by the court. Ryan Distributing Corp. v. Caley, D.C., 51 F.Supp. 377.

This action as developed by plaintiff has all the earmarks of an equitable action and is not triable to a jury. Beaunit Mills, Inc., v. Eday Fabrics Sales Corp., 2 Cir., 124 F.2d 563; Bellavance v. Plastic-Craft Novelty Co., D.C., 30 F.Supp. 37. If defendants had counterclaimed for damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C.A. § 67, they would be entitled to a jury trial of all issues involved in the damage counterclaim. Since they have not done so, this action calls only for exercise of this court’s equitable powers and should be tried by the court.

'The motion will be.granted.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 485 

To prohibit the use of eminent domain in carrying out certain projects. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself and Mr. COTTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of eminent domain in carrying out 

certain projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Assuring Private Prop5 erty Rights Over Vast Access to Land Act’’ or the ‘‘AP6 PROVAL Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON EMINENT DOMAIN FOR CERTAIN 

8 PROJECTS. 

9 Section 1222 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

10 U.S.C. 16421) is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 485 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsections (d) through (g) 

2 as subsections (f) through (i), respectively; and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(d) PROHIBITION ON EMINENT DOMAIN.—Notwith6 standing any other provision of law (including regula7 tions), the Secretary, SWPA, and WAPA may not carry 

8 out any Project under this section through the use of emi9 nent domain, unless the use of eminent domain is explic10 itly authorized by— 

11 ‘‘(1) the Governor and the head of each applica12 ble public utility commission or public service com13 mission of the affected State; and 

14 ‘‘(2) the head of the governing body of each In15 dian tribe the land of which would be affected. 

16 ‘‘(e) SITING REQUIREMENT.—To the maximum ex17 tent practicable, a Project carried out under this section 

18 shall be sited on— 

19 ‘‘(1) an existing Federal right-of-way; or 

20 ‘‘(2) Federal land managed by— 

21 ‘‘(A) the Bureau of Land Management; 

22 ‘‘(B) the Forest Service; 

23 ‘‘(C) the Bureau of Reclamation; or 

24 ‘‘(D) the Corps of Engineers.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

629 CA 12-01412 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

EDWARD A. LEGARRETA, M.D., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MELISSA A.L. NEAL, M.D., AND TWENTY 20 EYE CARE AND AESTHETIC OCULOPLASTIC MEDICINE, PLLC, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

MYERS, QUINN & SCHWARTZ, LLP, WILLIAMSVILLE (JAMES I. MYERS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (BRADLEY A. HOPPE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered March 1, 2012. The order and judgment, among other things, granted that part of plaintiff’s motion for entry of a default judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Legarreta v Neal ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [July 5, 2013]).

Entered: July 5, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-17-036]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date:  August 25, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.

Place:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-583 and 731-TA-1381 (Preliminary) (Cast 
Iron Soil Pipe Fittings from China). The Commission is currently 
scheduled to complete and file its determination on August 28, 2017; 
views of the Commission are currently scheduled to be completed and 
filed on September 5, 2017.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 16, 2017.
Katherine M. Hiner,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2017-17864 Filed 8-18-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 592 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 592

 To improve the transition between experimental permits and commercial 
           licenses for commercial reusable launch vehicles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 26, 2015

  Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Heinrich, and Mr. Udall) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To improve the transition between experimental permits and commercial 
           licenses for commercial reusable launch vehicles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH LICENSING.

    Section 50906 of title 51, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d), by striking ``launched or 
        reentered'' and inserting ``launched or reentered under that 
        permit'';
            (2) by amending subsection (d)(1) to read as follows:
            ``(1) research and development to test design concepts, 
        equipment, or operating techniques;'';
            (3) in subsection (d)(3), by striking ``prior to obtaining 
        a license'';
            (4) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``suborbital rocket 
        design'' and inserting ``suborbital rocket or rocket design''; 
        and
            (5) by amending subsection (g) to read as follows:
    ``(g) The Secretary may issue a permit under this section 
notwithstanding any license issued under this chapter. The issuance of 
a license under this chapter may not invalidate a permit under this 
section.''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-4.3






Exhibit 4.3




[FIRST CITIZENS BANC CORP. LETTERHEAD]




March 16, 2009                              




Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549




Re: First Citizens Banc Corp. Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008




Ladies and Gentlemen:



First Citizens Banc Corp., an Ohio corporation (FCBC), is today filing an Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K), as executed on March 16, 2009.



Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K,
FCBC hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements
defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated
subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K. None of such long-term debt
exceeds 10% of the total assets of FCBC and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.



Very truly yours,




	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ James O. Miller
 

James O. Miller

	 	 
	 	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John A. Gappa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John A. GappaJohn A. Gappa Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 12, 2003