alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                             119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                        56
<INVENTORY>                                      2,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,248
<PP&E>                                          11,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,083
<BONDS>                                          3,086
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,767
<SALES>                                         21,322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,322
<CGS>                                           17,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    43
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    300
<INCOME-TAX>                                        65
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
No. 07-15-00395-CR

Robert Spaeth

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee 

§

§

§

§

From the County Court at Law No. 1 

 of Potter County

October 18, 2017

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated October 18, 2017, it is ordered, 

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that 

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than September 5, 2017.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

                    1.                     *Aaron T. Boyken, individually, and together as a group acting in concert with the Allan J. Boyken Revocable Bank Stock Trust, with Allan J. Boyken as trustee; the F. Joy Boyken 2010 Trust, with Allan J. Boyken as trustee; and the F. Joy Boyken Revocable Bank Stock Trust, with F. Joy Boyken as trustee, all of Titonka, Iowa;*                     to acquire voting shares of Titonka Bancshares, Inc. and thereby acquire shares of Titonka Savings Bank, both of Titonka, Iowa.                

*B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis*                     (Brendan S. Murrin, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                

                    1.                     *Brian Solsrud, North Oaks, Minnesota;*                     to acquire shares of Flathead Lake Bancorporation, Inc., Polson, Montana, and thereby indirectly control First Citizens Bank of Polson, National Association, Polson, Montana.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 15, 2017.

Yao-Chin Chao,

Assistant Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2017-17506 Filed 8-17-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 12.1
 GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in millions)
 Nine FiscalMonthsEndedOctober 2,
    
    
    Year ended December 31,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004EARNINGS AS DEFINEDEarnings from operations before income taxes and before
adjustments for noncontrolling interests in consolidated
subsidiaries and after eliminating undistributed earnings
of equity method investees
    
    $
    178.0
    
    
    $
    302.4
    
    
    $
    288.9
    
    
    $
    203.2
    
    
    $
    61.5
    
    
    $
    18.5Preferred stock dividend (pre-tax equivalent)
    
    
    (0.2
    )
    
    
    (0.3
    )
    
    
    (0.5
    )
    
    
    (0.5
    )
    
    
    (33.8
    )
    
    
    (9.2
    )Fixed charges
    
    
    69.8
    
    
    
    109.2
    
    
    
    71.3
    
    
    
    44.4
    
    
    
    76.7
    
    
    
    49.4TOTAL EARNINGS, AS DEFINED
    
    $
    247.6
    
    
    $
    411.3
    
    
    $
    359.7
    
    
    $
    247.1
    
    
    $
    104.4
    
    
    $
    58.7FIXED CHARGES, AS DEFINEDInterest expense
    
    $
    62.6
    
    
    $
    98.4
    
    
    $
    63.6
    
    
    $
    38.1
    
    
    $
    36.5
    
    
    $
    35.0Amortization of capitalized expenses related to debt
    
    
    3.4
    
    
    
    5.7
    
    
    
    3.6
    
    
    
    3.0
    
    
    
    3.4
    
    
    
    2.7Preferred stock dividend (pre-tax equivalent)
    
    
    0.2
    
    
    
    0.3
    
    
    
    0.5
    
    
    
    0.5
    
    
    
    33.8
    
    
    
    9.2Interest component of rent expense
    
    
    3.6
    
    
    
    4.8
    
    
    
    3.6
    
    
    
    2.8
    
    
    
    3.0
    
    
    
    2.5TOTAL FIXED CHARGES, AS DEFINED
    
    $
    69.8
    
    
    $
    109.2
    
    
    $
    71.3
    
    
    $
    44.4
    
    
    $
    76.7
    
    
    $
    49.4RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    3.8
    
    
    
    5.0
    
    
    
    5.6
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.2
  51
ORIOIt'|AI.

lln f0,llt @nf te! $ltuttr t ourt of fpf ersl @tsims

No. l4-362 C

This Opinion Will Not Be Published in the U,S, Court of Federal Claims Reporter Because It

Does Not Add Significantly to the Body of Law.

(Fited: May 8,2014)

FILED

JARVIS SIM WOLFE,

Plaintiff,

MAY 8 2014

U.S. COURT OF

FEDGRALCI.AF

I'HE LINITED STA'I'ES,

Defendant.

OPINION and ORDER

On April 24,2014, plaintiff, Jarvis Sim Wolfe, filed a complaint in which he asked this

court to review a complaint that plaintiff allegedly has pending before the Mississippi Commission

of Judicial Performancc. The latter complaint appears to address various matters involving the

handling of plaintiff s criminal case bythe Mississippi state courts. No further reliefis requested.

This court is solemnly obliged, on its own accord, to address obvious questions conceming

its subject matter jurisdiction. See Mitchell v. Maurer,293 U.S. 237,244 (1934). This court

recognizes that plaintiff is acling pro se before this court, and thus the court will hold the form of

plaintifl's submissions to a less stringent standard than those drafted by an attorney. See Reed v.

United States,23 Cl.Ct.517,521 (1991) (citing Estelle v. Gamble,429 U.S. 97 (1976)). Having

reviewed plaintifls complaint, this court is certain that it lacks jurisdiction to consider the claim

that plaintiff raises.

With very limited exceptions, the jurisdictional statutes governing the United States Court

ol'Federal CIaims grant authority to the court only to issue judgments for money against the United

Slates and then, only when they are grounded in a contract, a money-mandating statute, or the

lakings clause of the Fillh Amendment. See United States v. Testan,424 U.5.392,397 -98

(1976);28 U,S.C. $ 1491. This court lacks jurisdiction to entertain general civil rights claims that

are not based upon an appropriate money-mandating provision. See, e.g., Sanders v. United

Stares,34 Fcd. Cl. 75, 80 (1995), afi'd,104 F.3d 376 (Fed. Cir. 1996), cert. denied,522 U.S. 831
(1997); Martinez v. IJnited States,26 Cl. Ct. 1471,1476 (1992), aff'd,1.1F.3d 1069 (Fed. Cir.

I 993). It also does not have jurisdiction to review decisions rendered by state courts. See Potter

v. Unired States,108 Fed. Cl. 544,547-48 (2013); Hernandez v. United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 195,

203 (2010). Nor does it otherwise hear claims involving state officials. See 28 U.S.C. $1491;

Shew/blt v. United States,104 F.3d 1333, 1337-38 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Harrison v. United Stares,

2014 WL 1006181, at *1 (Fed. Cl. March 12,2014).

Accordingly, the Clerk shall dismiss plaintilf s complaint for lack ofjurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERXD.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          123299
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 56000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            9473
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              9620
<LOANS>                                        1041476
<ALLOWANCE>                                      24849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1521081
<DEPOSITS>                                     1338460
<SHORT-TERM>                                     21927
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              22960
<LONG-TERM>                                       1000
<COMMON>                                          8574
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      128160
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1521081
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  96569
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                16765
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  1914
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                115248
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               47381
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               49822
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            65426
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     3950
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 198
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  60805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  30648
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       30648
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     20885
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.78
<LOANS-NON>                                       9317
<LOANS-PAST>                                       993
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  2463
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 19099
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     5297
<RECOVERIES>                                      2962
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                24849
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             24849
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 66 

To prohibit any regulation regarding carbon dioxide or other greenhouse 

gas emissions reduction in the United States until China, India, and 

Russia implement similar reductions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2015 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To prohibit any regulation regarding carbon dioxide or other 

greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the United States 

until China, India, and Russia implement similar reductions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ADMINISTRATOR. 

4 In this Act, the term ‘‘Administrator’’ means the Ad5 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 66 IS

1 (1) in 1997, the Senate adopted Senate Resolu2 tion 98, 105th Congress, agreed to July 25, 1997, 

3 which expressed the sense of the Senate that the 

4 United States should not accept any agreement that 

5 would mandate new commitments to limit or reduce 

6 greenhouse gas emissions by developed countries un7 less the agreement also mandated new specific 

8 scheduled commitments to limit or reduce green9 house gas emissions by developing countries within 

10 the same compliance period; and 

11 (2) the Administrator continues to move for12 ward with the regulation of carbon dioxide emis13 sions, however, the People’s Republic of China, 

14 India, and the Russian Federation do not impose 

15 similar regulations on carbon dioxide emissions. 

16 SEC. 3. CARBON DIOXIDE AND OTHER GREENHOUSE GAS 

17 EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS IN CHINA, INDIA, 

18 AND RUSSIA. 

19 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Ad20 ministrator or the head of any other Federal agency or 

21 department shall not regulate or continue to implement 

22 or enforce any regulations, proposals, or actions estab23 lishing any carbon dioxide or greenhouse gas emissions re24 ductions until the Administrator, the Administrator of the 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 66 IS

1 Energy Information Agency, and the Secretary of Com2 merce certify in writing that— 

3 (1) the People’s Republic of China, India, and 

4 the Russian Federation have proposed, implemented, 

5 and enforced measures requiring carbon dioxide and 

6 other greenhouse gas emissions reductions; and 

7 (2) the reductions described in paragraph (1) 

8 are substantially similar to the carbon dioxide and 

9 other greenhouse gas emission reductions proposed 

10 by the Administrator or the head of any other Fed11 eral agency or department for the United States. 

12 SEC. 4. REPEAL. 

13 Any regulation, proposal, or action in effect before, 

14 on, or after the date of enactment of this Act, but before 

15 the date on which the certification under section 3 is 

16 made, that requires any carbon dioxide or other green17 house gas emissions reduction shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2





OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel M. Walker, Senior Vice President of Accounting and Finance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: November 25, 2002


/s/    DANIEL M. WALKER


---

Daniel M. Walker


Senior Vice President


of Accounting and Finance


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELOISA DE LA CRUZ BHAGWANI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72883

Agency No. A070-942-155

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Eloisa De La Cruz Bhagwani, a native and citizen of the Philippines,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying

her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and

FILED

OCT 28 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72883

review de novo constitutional claims. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-

92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Bhagwani’s motion to

reopen as untimely because it was filed nearly twelve years after the BIA’s final

order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (motion to reopen must be filed

within ninety days of final order of removal), and Bhagwani did not show she

acted with the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see Iturribarria, 321

F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir. 2003) (deadline for filing motion to reopen can be

equitably tolled “when petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception,

fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence”). Bhagwani’s due

process claim therefore fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000)

(requiring error to prevail on a due process challenge). 

Bhagwani’s motion to stay her removal is denied. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,646
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,008
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     80,390
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        273,756
<ALLOWANCE>                                        763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 378,325
<DEPOSITS>                                     278,345
<SHORT-TERM>                                    50,850
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,531
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 378,325
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,365
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,706
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,071
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,426
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,019
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,052
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       12
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  93
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,070
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,007
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,007
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.91
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,133
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   751
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  763
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               763
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>