alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 606 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 606

To extend the right of appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board to 
         certain employees of the United States Postal Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 26, 2015

Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Schatz) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the right of appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board to 
         certain employees of the United States Postal Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Postal Employee Appeal Rights 
Amendments Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. RIGHT OF APPEAL TO MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

    Section 1005(a)(4)(A)(ii)(I) of title 39, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
                    ``(I) is an officer or employee of the Postal 
                Service who--
                            ``(aa) is not represented by a bargaining 
                        representative recognized under section 1203; 
                        and
                            ``(bb) is in a supervisory, professional, 
                        technical, clerical, administrative, or 
                        managerial position covered by the Executive 
                        and Administrative Schedule; and''.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134116 & (25) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134116 

 COA: 274116 
 Wayne CC: 94-009537-01 

CONRAD ERIC SANDERS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion to add issue is GRANTED. The application for 

leave to appeal the May 11, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is 

DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement 

to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Donald M. Boone, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Jewett Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 12, 2006

/s/ Donald M. Boone





Donald M. Boone

Chief Executive Officer





1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,881
<SECURITIES>                                    37,725
<RECEIVABLES>                                  159,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,644
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,457
<PP&E>                                           6,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          192,642
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            21
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,689
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,399
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   207
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,382
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,230
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
        

</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 1105 V

UNPUBLISHED

J A MES MAHONEY

, ESQ.

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: February 27, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Uncontested; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Steven Douglas Hillyard , Law Office of Steven D. Hillyard, APC, Newport Beach, CA

, for petitioner.

Camille Michelle Collett , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On July 30, 2018

, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffere d Guillain

- Barré Syndrome (GBS) after receiving the

influenza vaccination on September 12, 2017 . Petit ion at 1, ¶ 2

. Petitioner f urther alleges that he received the vaccination in the United S tates and neither he nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for hi s GBS , alleged as

vaccine caused

. Id. at ¶¶ 2 , 15

- 16. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Managemen t and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 19 86, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2

On February 27, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he states

that he does not contest that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent con cedes “ that petitioner

has satisfied the criteria set forth in the recently revised Vaccine Injury Table (Table)

and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (QAI), which afford petitioner a presumption of causation if the onset of GBS occurs between thr ee and forty

- two days

after a seasonal flu vaccination and there is no apparent alternative cause. ” Id. at 8

.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS,

Appellant,

v.

ALBERT LOPEZ AND LEXBY LOPEZ,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-24-00078-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3 

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#2017DCV0065)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay all costs of this 

appeal and that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF MAY 2024.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use of our reports dated March 3, 2015 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Talisman
Energy Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Talisman Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2014, included in an exhibit to the Annual Report (Form 40-F) for the year
ended December 31, 2014.

We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-178449) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan and
Director Stock Option Plan of Talisman Energy Inc., (ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-154924) pertaining to the Corporate Strategy Implementation
Recognition Program of Talisman Energy Inc., (iii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-178450) pertaining to the Performance Share Unit Plan for Eligible Employees
of Talisman Energy Inc. and its Affiliates, and (iv) the shelf Registration Statement (Form F-10 No. 333-195110), of our reports dated March 3, 2015, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Talisman Energy Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated statements of income
(loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and a summary of significant accounting policies and
other explanatory information, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Talisman Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2014, included in an exhibit to the Annual
Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Signed "Ernst & Young LLP"

Calgary,
Canada
March 3, 2015

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANICAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          53,304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                       870
<INVENTORY>                                     30,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,002
<PP&E>                                          89,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,413
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,547
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,105
<SALES>                                        288,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               290,294
<CGS>                                          174,440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,407
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   312
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,918
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,617
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,301
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (863)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,438
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  July 6, 2007 | Signed:  Terry D. Schumacher                
|------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                    | Terry D. Schumacher,
Chief Financial Officer
Filed 8/2/16 Marks v. Bucato, LLC CA2/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

WALTER N. MARKS, INC.,

Plaintiff and Respondent

,

v.

BU CATO, LLC,

Defendant and Appellant

. B267019

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. B C 584545 )

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.

Rafael A. Ongkeko , Judge . Affirmed.

Duringer Law Group and Er ic J. Bautista f or Defendant and Appellant

.

Cox, Castle & Nicholson and Perry D. Mocciaro for Plaintiff and Respondent

.

___________________ __________ _2

Following the alleged nonpayment of rent on a lease by defendant and appellant

Bucato, LLC ( the ten ant ), plaintiff and respondent Walter N. Marks, Inc. ( the landlord )

filed an action for unlawful detainer against the tenant . After a court trial, judgment was

entered in favor of the landlord . Specifically, the landlord was entitled to possession of

the premises and mo netary damages in the amount of $141, 841.82. The tenant timely

appealed.

On February 9, 2016, the landlord filed a motion for dismissal, as moot, of that

portion of this appeal appealing from the termination of lease and award of possessio n of

the subject premises in the underlying unlawful detainer action. No timely opposition

was filed. On February 29, 2016, we granted the landlord’s motion ; our order was filed

March 3, 2016 . According to our order, the only portion of the appeal curre ntly pending

is the award of damages.

On March 11, 2016, the tenant filed a “motion for order vacating court’s ruling on

[the landlord’s] unopposed motion for partial dismissal of appeal and opposition to [the

landlord’s] motion for partial dismissal of ap peal.” The landlord opposed that motion.

On March 28, 2016, we denied the tenant’s motion.

On April 1, 2016, the tenant filed its opening brief in this appeal . According to the

tenant , the trial court’s entry of judgment for unlawful detainer in favor o f the landlord is

not supported by substantial evidence. Because the “Trial Record does not contain

substantial evidence to support the Trial Court’s Judgment of unlawful detainer against

the [tenant,

. . . ] the judgment for unpaid rent and holdover damag es awarded in such

judgment

. . . should be overturned.” Because the tenant’s challenge to the damages

award (the only pending issue on appeal) hinges on its challenge to the entire judgment,

which, pursuant to our earlier order, has been dismissed, there is nothing for us to review.3 DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed

. The landlord is entitled to costs on appeal

.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

.

______________________________, Acting P. J.

ASHMANN

- GERST

We concur:

____ ___ ________________________, J.

CHAVEZ

_______________________________, J.

HOFFSTADT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      214
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6
<INVENTORY>                                        256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   475
<PP&E>                                             842
<DEPRECIATION>                                     564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              451
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                          95
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       765
<SALES>                                          1,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,288
<CGS>                                            1,257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.73)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2010 

Order 

 

June 23, 2010 

139969(62) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 139969 

v COA: 287033 

Saginaw CC: 05-026696-FH 

DONALD ALLEN LOWN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension of 

time for filing its brief is considered and the time is extended to July 20, 2010.