alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Zale Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-67527, 333-51607, 333-20673, 333-01789, 33-87782, 333-53802, and 333-53804
on Form S-8) of Zale Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated August 29,
2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Zale Corporation and
subsidiaries as of July 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, cash flows, and stockholders' investment for the year then ended,
and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the July
31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Zale Corporation. Our report refers to
the adoption of the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Boards'
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, "Business Combinations" and
No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" in fiscal year 2002, and to the
change in the method of determining price indices used in the valuation of LIFO
inventories in fiscal year 2002.


KPMG LLP
Dallas, Texas
OCTOBER 2, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14


                ADDENDUM TO FORM OF CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT


The following agreements are substantially identical to the Form of Change of
Control Agreement shown here, except for the names and therefore are not filed
as separate documents in accordance with Exchange Act rule 12b-31.

Form of Change of Control Agreement dated as of October 30, 1996 between Zale
Corporation (the "Company"), and the following "Key Employees":

1)      Beryl B. Raff

2)      Alan P. Shor

3)      Mary L. Forte

4)      Paul G. Leonard

5)      Tom A. Carroll

6)      Sue E. Gove

7)      David L. Holmberg

8)      Gregory Humenesky

9)      Paul D. Kanneman

10)     Stephen C. Massanelli

11)     Ervin G. Polze
----

|    |                                                                                                             |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K of World Acceptance Corporation; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                    |
|------------------------------------|
|                                    |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                               |   |   |   |   |
| Date:  February 19, 2013 | By: | /s/ A. A. McLean III |   |   |
|                               |   | A. A. McLean III |   |   |
|                               |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

----
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                       Seal Fleet, Inc. and Subsidiaries

                   Computation of Earnings Per Common Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Years Ended December 31,
                                                              --------------------------
                                                                  1996          1995
                                                              ------------   -----------
<S>                                                           <C>            <C>
 
Primary Earnings Per Share
 Net income (loss) applicable to common stock                  $6,153,000    $ (116,000)
                                                               ==========    ==========
 
 Common shares outstanding                                      2,312,405     2,034,627
 Effect of using weighted average common and common
   equivalent shares outstanding                                 (122,283)            -
 Effect of shares issuable under stock options using the
   treasury stock method                                                *             -
                                                               ----------    ----------
 Shares used in computing primary earnings per share            2,190,122     2,034,627
                                                               ==========    ==========
 
 Primary earnings (loss) per common share                      $     2.81    $    (0.06)
                                                               ==========    ==========
</TABLE>




_________________________
* Antidilutive
# TABLE 1

# TABLE 2

#  TABLE 3

# TABLE 4
EXHIBIT 32.1      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The  undersigned,  the  Principal  Executive  Officer  (CEO)  and the  Principal
Financial  Officer (CFO) of Viking  Capital  Group,  Inc. (the  "Company")  each
hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

         (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004,  filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  May 7, 2004           /s/ William J. Fossen
                              ---------------------
                              William J. Fossen
                              Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  May 7, 2004           /s/ Matthew W. Fossen
                              ---------------------
                              Matthew W. Fossen
                              Chief Financial Officer







                                                                              25
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 30, 2015

No. 04-15-00225-CR

Arturo Rosales aka Artemio Rosales-AYALA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10431

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for access to the appellate record is granted. We order the clerk of 

this court to send appellant, pro se, a copy of the record. We further order appellant’s pro se 

brief is due November 16, 2015. Appellant is advised that no extensions of time to file the pro 

se brief will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Douglas Victor LOLLAR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-51275

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*388Evers Jason Leach, Law Office of E. Jason Leach, Odessa, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Douglas Victor Lollar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Lollar has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lollar’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Lol-lar’s motion for authorization to proceed pro se on appeal is DENIED. See *United States v. Wagner,*158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
ex10-8.htm


    


    


    Exhibit
10.8

    


    Current Named Executive
Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements for 2009

    


    Base
Salaries

    


    The base
salaries for 2009 for the following executive officers of Great Southern
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") and Great Southern Bank (the "Bank") currently are
as follows:

    


    
      	
              Name
      and Title

            	
              Base
      Salary

            
	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
              William
      V. Turner

            	
              $200,000

            
	
              Chairman
      of the Board of

            
	
              the
      Company and the Bank

            
	 
      
	
              Joseph
      W. Turner

            	
              $228,800

            
	
              President
      and Chief

            
	
              Executive
      Officer of the

            
	
              Company
      and the Bank

            
	 
      
	
              Rex
      A. Copeland

            	
              $181,796

            
	
              Treasurer
      of the Company

            
	
              and
      Senior Vice President and

            
	
              Chief
      Financial Officer of the Bank

            
	 
      
	
              Steven
      G. Mitchem

            	
              $190,000

            
	
              Senior
      Vice President and Chief

            
	
              Lending
      Officer of the Bank

            
	 
      
	
              Douglas
      W. Marrs

            	
              $107,341

            
	
              Secretary
      of the Company and

            
	Secretary,
      Vice President – Operations
	of
      the Bank
	 
	Linton
      J. Thomason	$104,763
	Vice
      President – Information Services 
	of
      the Bank 
	 


    

     

    Description
of Bonus Arrangements

    


    As a
result of the compensation restrictions applicable to the Company contained in
the recently enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the bonus
arrangements for the Company's executive officers not governed by contract are
currently under evaluation.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0222. DEREK LEROY MCSMITH v. LABOR READY SOUTHEAST,

INC.

On November 30, 2016, the superior court entered an order confirming the

arbitration award and a final judgment in favor of Labor Ready Southeast, Inc. in the

amount of $14,235.00. Derek Leroy McSmith filed a timely application for

discretionary appeal from the order. However, no provision of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a)

requires the filing of a discretionary application from such an order. Therefore, the

order is subject to direct appeal. See, e. g., Green Tree Servicing v. Jones, 333 Ga.

App. 184 (1) (775 SE2d 714) (2015).

This Court will grant an otherwise timely discretionary application if the lower

court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6- 35 (j). Accordingly, this

application is hereby GRANTED. McSmith shall have ten days from the date of this

order to file a notice of appeal with the trial court. If, however, he has already filed

a notice of appeal from the order at issue, he need not file a second notice. The clerk

of the trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

January 18, 2017

01/18/2017
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael B. Kropp, Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 273]

*1340Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of felony driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c] [former (ii)]) and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree (§ 511 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the bargained-for sentence of incarceration imposed by County Court is not unduly harsh or severe. “We are constrained, however, to vacate the sentence” imposed for aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree *(People v John,*288 AD2d 848, 850 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 705 [2002]; *see People v Figueroa,*17 AD3d 1130, 1131 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 788 [2005]; *People v Fehr,*303 AD2d 1039, 1040 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 538 [2003]). The comments of the court in imposing a $200 fine with respect to that offense reflect “ ‘the court’s misapprehension that it had no ability to exercise its discretion’ in determining whether to impose a fine” *(John,*288 AD2d at 850). We therefore modify the judgment accordingly, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing on that offense. Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Smith, Green and Gorski, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 159 (Friday, August 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17669]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Board Member Meeting

Agenda

    Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, Federal Retirement 
Thrift Investment Board Members' Meeting, August 28, 2017, 10:00 a.m. 
(Telephonic).

Open Session

1. Approval of the Minutes for the July 24, 2017 Board Members' Meeting
2. Monthly Reports
    (a) Participant Activity
    (b) Investment Performance
    (c) Legislative Report
3. Quarterly Reports
    (a) Metrics
    (b) Project Activity
    (c) Audit Status
4. 2017-2018 Calendar Review
5. Blended Retirement Update
6. IT Update

Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office 
of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: August 16, 2017.
Megan Grumbine,
General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-17669 Filed 8-16-17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James FRITH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-2364.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Feb. 4, 2008.

Joel R. Levin, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Robert A. Handelsman, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge, Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge and Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

On August 29, 2006, 461 F.3d 914, this court ordered a limited remand so the district court could state on the record whether the sentence remains appropriate now that *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), has limited the guidelines to advisory status. *See United States v. Paladino,*401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.2005).

The district judge has now replied that she cannot conclude that she would have imposed the same sentence on Frith at the time of his original sentencing had she known that the guidelines were advisory and not binding. In reply to our invitation to comment on the district court’s *Paladino*response, the United States agrees that resentencing is appropriate. The defendant did not file a position statement. Accordingly, pursuant to *Paladino,*we VACATE Frith’s sentence and REMAND to the district court for resentencing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 28, 2019

Order 

Clerk

June 28, 2019

158716(74)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 158716

v COA: 334205

Wayne CC: 16-003006-FH

GARY GILMORE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted 

as timely filed if submitted on or before August 16, 2019.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned officers of KUBOTA
CORPORATION (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 19, 2009



/s/ Yasuo MasumotoYasuo MasumotoRepresentative Director, President & CEO(Chief Executive Officer)/s/ Satoru SakamotoSatoru SakamotoDirector and Managing Executive Officer(Chief Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          DRUG GUILD DISTRIBUTORS, INC.

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                              For the Year Ended July 31,
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                           1996          1995          1994
                                       ------------   -----------   -----------
Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding (A)  ..........    10,062,000     9,930,000     9,689,000
                                       ============   ===========   ===========

Net income (loss)  ..................  $ (2,264,000)  $  (505,000)  $   308,000

Less:
   Stock dividend on special
     common stock (B)  ..............                                    67,000
   Stock dividend on preferred
     stock ..........................       191,000       291,000       413,000
                                       ------------   -----------   -----------

Net (loss) attributable to common
   stockholders .....................  $ (2,455,000)  $  (796,000)  $  (172,000)
                                       ============   ===========   ===========

Per share:
   Net income (loss) ................  $       (.22)  $      (.05)  $       .03
   Less stock dividend on special
     common stock and preferred
     stock ..........................           .02           .03           .05
                                       ------------   -----------   -----------

Net (loss) attributable to common
   stockholders .....................  $       (.24)  $      (.08)  $      (.02)
                                       ============   ===========   ===========

(A)   In the computation of earnings per share, subscriptions receivable have no
      effect on weighted average number of common shares outstanding.

(B)   Dividend paid-in common stock to stockholders of special common stock, who
      elected to exchange their existing shares for common stock instead of
      preferred stock.

                                 F-20
exv10w22







Exhibit 10.22




Henry Schein, Inc.

135 Duryea Road

Melville, New York 11747




December 23, 2008




Biolase Technology, Inc.

4 Cromwell

Irvine, California 92618

Attention: David M. Mulder




Dear Mr. Mulder:




     With reference to that certain License and Distribution Agreement by and between Henry Schein,
Inc. (the “Distributor”) and Biolase Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), dated as of August 8, 2006
and subsequently amended by Addendum I, effective as of April 1, 2007, and by the Amendment dated
as of February 29, 2008 (collectively, the “Agreement”), the Distributor and the Company hereby
agree that the initial term under the Agreement shall be extended to December 31, 2010.



     This letter agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with the
laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of laws principles.



Very truly yours,




HENRY SCHEIN, INC.




By: /s/ Brian S. Watson

           Name: Brian S. Watson

           Title: Vice President, Strategic and Business Planning




ACCEPTED AND AGREED:




BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.




By: /s/ David M. Mulder

           Name: David M. Mulder

           Title: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
     I, Gerardo Canet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
     to 18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
     Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                                                 /s/Gerardo Canet
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Gerardo Canet
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    August 14, 2003



Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
any other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.