alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                                                                      Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form
S-8, No. 33-60845, of Wilshire Oil Company of Texas our report dated March 25,
2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Wilshire Oil Company of Texas as of December 31, 2002 and for the year then
ended included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002.

                                               /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                               -----------------------
                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP



New York, New York
March 28, 2003
Exhibit 32





Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/ Lawrence T. Borgard


Lawrence T. Borgard


President and Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Joseph P. O'Leary


Joseph P. O'Leary


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








Date:  February 23, 2011








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Wisconsin Public Service Corporation for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wisconsin Public Service Corporation and will be retained by Wisconsin Public Service Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  of Viking
Capital Group,  Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, William J. Fossen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  August 13, 2003       /s/ William J. Fossen
                              ---------------------
                              William J. Fossen
                              Chief Executive Officer










                                                                              26
Exhibit 99.2

 

 

 

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE WPS RESOURCES CORPORATION CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

 

    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersignedSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WPS ResourcesCorporation hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report onForm 10-K of WPS Resources Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of WPS Resources Corporation.

 

 

 

 

/s/ Joseph P. O'Leary

____________________________________

Joseph P. O'LearySenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerWPS Resources Corporation

March 10, 2003

 

 

    This certification accompanies this Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed bythe Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     The undersigned executive officer of Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin, Inc. (the “Registrant”)hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2005 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Registrant.     /s/ Douglas J. Timmerman     Douglas J. Timmerman, Chairman of the Board, President
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-11146

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

COSME SANCHEZ-GALLARDO, also known as Jose Salinas-Gonzales

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CR-34-ALL

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cosme Sanchez-Gallardo

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 30, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-11146

2

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0457 In the Matter of S.G., an Alleged Mentally Ill Person,

Respondent and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 3 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 27 2024

08/27/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0457
f 'et. a

;11. .4,,,it4v) ,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 06-0544

IN RE PETITION OF CASEY C. NIXON FOR

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN

THE BAR OF MONTANA

FILED

A! 2 2020

O R D

G

, 

eenwood co Sup

DO

tate cyr m

rem. ontanaCourt

Casey C. Nixon has petitioned this Court for reinstatement to active status in the

State Bar of Montana. Nixon was placed on inactive status for failing to comply with the

Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending March 31, 2019.

Attached to the Petition is a letter from the State Bar stating that Nixon has now completed

all CLE requirements for that reporting year. The Petition states that Nixon is working

with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to resolve two complaints filed against him in

2019, and that he has not committed any acts or omissions sanctionable under the Rules of

Professional Conduct while on inactive status. It appearing that Nixon has satisfied the

requirements for reinstatement,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Casey C. Nixon for reinstatement

to active status in the State Bar ofMontana is GRANTED. Upon payment of any remaining

dues, fees, and the state license tax to the State Bar of Montana, Nixon shall be reinstated.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED thisCA, - day of April, 2020.

Chief Justice

04/21/2020

Case Number: PR 06-0544
/

2
No. 957.

#### Norris et al. *v.*United States.

May 20, 1946.

*Bernard A. Colding*for petitioners..

*Solicitor General McGrath, Robert S. Erdahl*and *Beatrice Rosenberg*for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          38,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    100,359
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,990
<PP&E>                                         382,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 521,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,158
<BONDS>                                        257,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,294
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,613)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   521,493
<SALES>                                        501,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               503,600
<CGS>                                          499,377
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  499,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,196)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,061)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,061)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.62)



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Gilbert Amadeo, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 754]

In response to confidential information received from two separate sources, petitioner’s cube was packed up and frisked, during the course of which a correction officer found two sharpened pieces of metal secreted in the leg of a chair determined to belong to petitioner. As a result, petitioner was charged with, insofar as is relevant to this proceeding, possession of a weapon. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the weapon charge and a penalty was imposed. Although the penalty was modified upon administrative appeal, the underlying determination was otherwise affirmed. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who packed up and frisked petitioner’s cube and the correction sergeant who received the detailed and credible confidential information, as well as the confidential information itself, provide *1122substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt *(see Matter of Cummings v Goord,*10 AD3d 748, 749 [2004]). Although petitioner’s access to the chair may not have been exclusive, a reasonable inference of possession arises from the fact that the weapon was discovered in petitioner’s cube and, hence, in an area within petitioner’s control *(see Matter of Parrilla v Selsky,*32 AD3d 1086, 1087 [2006], *lv denied*8 NY3d 803 [2007]; *Matter of Cummings v Goord,*10 AD3d at 749). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his assertions that his prehearing confinement deprived him of due process and that the penalty imposed was unduly harsh, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Cardona, P.J., Carpinello, Lahtinen, Kane and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit 21.1



WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006

The following table includes the subsidiaries of Wisconsin Electric Power Company, an electric, gas and steam utility incorporated in the state of Wisconsin, as well as the percent of ownership, as of December 31, 2006.  Wisconsin Electric is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wisconsin Energy Corporation.



|Subsidiary (a)                    | State of
Incorporationor Organization | PercentOwnership
|--------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ----------------
|                                  |                                       |                 
|ATC Management Inc.               | Wisconsin                             | 29.41%          
|American Transmission Company LLC | Wisconsin                             | 25.81%          
|Bostco LLC                        | Wisconsin                             | 100%            
|Blue Sky Wind Farm, LLC           | Minnesota                             | 100%            
|Green Field Wind Farm, LLC        | Minnesota                             | 100%            
|Lake Breeze Wind Farm, LLC        | Wisconsin                             | 100%            



|(a) | Omits the names of certain subsidiaries, which if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a "significant subsidiary" as of December 31, 2006.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JOHN
NUVEEN COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          18,385
<SECURITIES>                                    38,978
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               206,583
<PP&E>                                          52,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                (31,925)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 552,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,666
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           45,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           387
<OTHER-SE>                                     375,281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   552,533
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,338
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                95,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,985
<INCOME-TAX>                                    34,576
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,409
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,409
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Arizona Gold and Onyx Mining Company f/k/a Viking Capital Group, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Dick Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

May 8, 2018

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
 Summary term sheet governing arrangement of consulting services Icarus Investment Corp. performs pursuant to oral agreement 
 Icarus Investment Corp. is paid $30,000 per month for consulting services. Icarus Investment Corp. performs for CECO consulting services regarding the Company’s corporate policies, marketing,
strategic and financial planning, including long and short-term goals, mergers and acquisitions and other business combinations, financing, growth plans and other related matters. 
 Icarus Investment Corp. is engaged as an independent contractor, and is not an employee of the Company for any purpose whatsoever, including without limitation, for purposes relating to taxes,
workers’ compensation or workplace safety insurance, payments required by statute or any other withholdings or remittances to any governmental agency or authority. No course of dealing between the parties is intended to create, or shall create,
an employment relationship, a joint venture, partnership or any similar relationship. CECO is interested only in the results obtained by Icarus Investment Corp. and Icarus Investment Corp. shall have sole control of the manner and means of
performing its services to CECO consistent with the policies and practices of CECO and with CECO’s interests and in accordance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in millions)
 Three FiscalMonthsEndedMarch 30,
    
    




    Year Ended December 31,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002EARNINGS, AS DEFINEDEarnings (loss) from operations before income
taxes and before adjustments for minority
interests in consolidated subsidiaries
and after eliminating undistributed
earnings of equity method investees
    
    $
    60.3
    
    
    $
    204.3
    
    
    $
    61.5
    
    
    $
    18.5
    
    
    $
    (1.2
    )
    
    $
    (27.6
    )Preferred stock dividend (pre-tax equivalent)
    
    
    (0.1
    )
    
    
    (0.5
    )
    
    
    (33.8
    )
    
    
    (9.2
    )
    
    
    (0.9
    )
    
    
    Fixed charges
    
    
    9.7
    
    
    
    43.3
    
    
    
    76.7
    
    
    
    49.4
    
    
    
    53.6
    
    
    
    47.5TOTAL EARNINGS, AS DEFINED
    
    $
    69.9
    
    
    $
    247.1
    
    
    $
    104.4
    
    
    $
    58.7
    
    
    $
    51.5
    
    
    $
    19.9FIXED CHARGES, AS DEFINEDInterest expense
    
    $
    7.8
    
    
    $
    36.9
    
    
    $
    36.5
    
    
    $
    35.0
    
    
    $
    45.3
    
    
    $
    41.3Amortization of capitalized expenses related
to debt
    
    
    1.1
    
    
    
    3.1
    
    
    
    3.4
    
    
    
    2.7
    
    
    
    4.5
    
    
    
    3.7Preferred stock dividend (pre-tax equivalent)
    
    
    0.1
    
    
    
    0.5
    
    
    
    33.8
    
    
    
    9.2
    
    
    
    0.9
    
    
    
    Interest component of rent expense
    
    
    0.7
    
    
    
    2.8
    
    
    
    3.0
    
    
    
    2.5
    
    
    
    2.9
    
    
    
    2.5TOTAL FIXED CHARGES, AS DEFINED
    
    $
    9.7
    
    
    $
    43.3
    
    
    $
    76.7
    
    
    $
    49.4
    
    
    $
    53.6
    
    
    $
    47.5RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
    
    
    7.2
    
    
    
    5.7
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
  49
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,941,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               43,311,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             222,061,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,775,000
<BONDS>                                    155,608,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        91,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,587,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               222,061,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,296,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,119,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,598,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,579,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,078,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,501,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21 (a)

SUBSIDIARIES OF OXIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.



As of December 31, 2003, the Companys subsidiaries were as follows:



|                             |  |                              
|---------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                         |  | Jurisdiction of incorporation
|                             | 
|OXIS Health Products, Inc.   |  | Delaware                     
|OXIS Therapeutics, Inc.      |  | Delaware                     
|OXIS International S.A.      |  | France                       
|OXIS Acquisition Corporation |  | Delaware                     
|OXIS Isle of Man Limited     |  | Isle of Man                  
|OXIS Instruments, Inc.       |  | Pennsylvania