alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the quarter ended August 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                          779640
<RECEIVABLES>                                 45230857
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                           54328522
<PP&E>                                        13162716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               130648124
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                    19934208
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                            13327179
<LONG-TERM>                                    3250000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        143432
<OTHER-SE>                                    89293197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 130648124
<TRADING-REVENUE>                             29683515
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           1995559
<COMMISSIONS>                                  7696151
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   426588
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               71741
<COMPENSATION>                                15024338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6020863
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3003041
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3003041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T h e p a rtie s c o n s e n te dto p r o c e e db e f o r e am a g is tr a te ju d g e . See 28 ** U . S . C . § 6 36 (c ).

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** * w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T SA N TO S REN E FLO RES, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. S U M A Y A ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 16758 D . C. N o . 1 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 8 5 3 - G SA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G a ryS . A us t i n, M a gi s tr a t e Judge , P r e s i di ng ** S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r10, 2012 *** B efo re: W A R D L A W , C L IF T O N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner S ant os R ene F l ores appeal s pro se fr om the m agi stra t e j ud ge’ s orderdenyi ng hi s r equestfor r evi ew by an A rt i cl e I II j ud ge of 

# FI LED SEP 24 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 16758 2 the m agi stra t e j ud ge’ s pri or order di sm i ss i ng F l ores ’ s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on for fa i l ure t o exh austadm i ni stra t i ve re m edi es . W e r evi ew de no vo w hether the m a g is tr a te ju d g e h a dju r is d ic tio n o v e rF lo r e s , I rw in v . M

a s c o tt , 370 F . 3d 924, 929 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) , a n dw e a f f irm . C ontr a ryt o F l or e s ’ s c ont e nt i on, the m a gi s tr a t e j udge di d nota c tw i thout ju risd icti o n b ec au se b o th p ar ti es co n se n tedin w riti n g to th e m ag istrate ju d g e’s ju r is d ic tio n . See D i

xo n v. Y l st , 990 F . 2d 478, 480 ( 9th C i r . 1993) . T o the e xt e nt thatF l ores chal l enges the deni al of hi s r equestt o w i thd raw consentt o p roce ed be f or e the m a gi s tr a t e j udge , the c ha l l e nge f a i l s be c aus e he di d nots how “e x tr a o r d in a ryc ir c u m s ta n c e s .” 2 8 U .S .C . § 6 3 6 ( c ) ( 4 ) ; D i x on , 990 F . 2d a t480 (e xp l ai ni ng thata party i n a ci vi l ac t i on m ayw i thd raw i t s c on se ntt o p roce ed before am agi stra t e j ud ge on l y by s ho w i ng extra ordi naryci rc um st ance s) . W e d o n o t a d d r e s s th e is s u e s F lo r e s r a is e s w ith r e g a r dto th e m a g is tr a te j ud ge’ s und er l yi ng order di sm i ss i ng hi s a ct i on for f ai l ure t o exh austas the court pr e vi ous l yor de r e d tha tthe s c ope of F l or e s ’ s appe a l w a s l i m i t e d t o r e vi e w of the Ju n e 1 3 , 2 0 1 1 o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n f o rr e c o n s id e r a tio n . AF F I RME D.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Robert CoppleRobert CoppleChief Financial Officer th
 /s/ Carol WaldmanName:
    Carol WaldmanTitle:
    Notary Public
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-51183

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FERNANDO SALDANA JIMENEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-1567-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Fernando Saldana Jimenez has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Saldana Jimenez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 13-51183 Document: 00513079377 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
No. 13-51183

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 13-51183 Document: 00513079377 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ZERO CORPORATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          30,979
<SECURITIES>                                     9,990
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                       818
<INVENTORY>                                     31,409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,745
<PP&E>                                          99,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,194
<BONDS>                                         50,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           166
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,998
<SALES>                                        258,745
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               258,745
<CGS>                                          171,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.93
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

RACHITA BARNES

v.

PHL RENTAL PROPERTIES, LLC AND

JOHNNY DANG

PETITION OF: PHL RENTAL PROPERTIES, LLC :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 159 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of November, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### CENTURY INDEMNITY CO. v. DUMAS et al.

Civ. No. 3945.

United States District Court N. D. New York.

Argued July 25, 1951.

Decided Aug. *7,*1951.

*590Brush, Lawrence & Bennett Herkimer, N. Y., for plaintiff, Albert L. Lawrence, Herkimer, N. Y., of counsel.

Fred J. O’Donnell, Ilion, N. Y., for defendants Dumas & Schweir & Farm Bureau Co.

BRENNAN, Chief Judge’.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment in which plaintiff seeks an adjudication of the rights of all parties under the terms of certain automobile liability insurance policies.

There is pending in the Supreme Court of Herkimer County a negligence action brought by Taylor against Dumas, et al., to recover *on account of*alleged negligence arising out of the collision of two motor vehicles, the accident occurring in Herki-mer County, New York, on or about the 19th day of February, 1950. In that action Dumas, et al., has impleaded a third-party defendant by state third-party proceedings.

Defendants, Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Dumas, et al., move under the provisions of Rule 12(b) of. the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue and insufficiency of service of process. It would appear that the motions must be granted.

The jurisdiction of the Court is based upon diversity of citizenship of the litigants, and it is fundamental that, to give the Court jurisdiction, such diversity must exist between every plaintiff and every defendant. Here, the plaintiff is a citizen of Connecticut as is also the defendant Dumas, who appears to be an indispensable party. Indianapolis v. Chase National Bank, 314 U.S. 63, 62 S.Ct. 15, 86 L.Ed. 47.

Service of the summons was made upon Dumas and the Farm Bureau Company outside of the State of New York. The service is ineffectual under the provisions of Rule 4(f). Federal Landlords’ Committee v. Woods, D.C., 9 F.R.D. 622.

With the elimination of the above parties, the action stands as properly brought against defendant Taylor, who does not join in the motion. It is apparent, however, that parties other than Taylor are indispensable here, and it further appears that the action pending in the state court in Herkimer County will determine all of the rights of the parties, or at least all of the rights of the parties may be determined therein. The Court, therefore, feels that for the reasons above stated, and on account of all of the facts and circumstances, the motion should be granted dismissing the complaint in its entirety, and as against all parties. Uryga v. Ragen, 7 Cir., 181 F.2d 660 at 664; Jones v. Motorola, Inc., 2 Cir., 186 F.2d 707.

It is so ordered.
IC 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 501 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2015 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

AN ACT 

To make technical corrections to the Navajo water rights 

settlement in the State of New Mexico, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 501 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Mexico Navajo 

3 Water Settlement Technical Corrections Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NAVAJO WATER SETTLEMENT. 

5 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 10302 of the Omnibus 

6 Public Land Management Act of 2009 (43 U.S.C. 407 

7 note; Public Law 111–11) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Arrellano’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘Arellano’’; and 

10 (2) in paragraph (27), by striking ‘‘75–185’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘75–184’’. 

12 (b) DELIVERY AND USE OF NAVAJO-GALLUP WATER

13 SUPPLY PROJECT WATER.—Section 10603(c)(2)(A) of 

14 the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Pub15 lic Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1385) is amended— 

16 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘Article III(c)’’ 

17 and inserting ‘‘Articles III(c)’’; and 

18 (2) in clause (ii)(II), by striking ‘‘Article III(c)’’ 

19 and inserting ‘‘Articles III(c)’’. 

20 (c) PROJECT CONTRACTS.—Section 10604(f)(1) of 

21 the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Pub22 lic Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1391) is amended by inserting 

23 ‘‘Project’’ before ‘‘water’’. 

24 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

25 10609 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

26 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1395) is amended— 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

S 501 RFH 

1 (1) in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b), 

2 by striking ‘‘construction or rehabilitation’’ each 

3 place it appears and inserting ‘‘planning, design, 

4 construction, rehabilitation,’’; 

5 (2) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘2 percent’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘4 percent’’; and 

7 (3) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ‘‘4 percent’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘2 percent’’. 

9 (e) AGREEMENT.—Section 10701(e) of the Omnibus 

10 Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111– 

11 11; 123 Stat. 1400) is amended in paragraphs (2)(A), 

12 (2)(B), and (3)(A) by striking ‘‘and Contract’’ each place 

13 it appears. 

Passed the Senate May 21, 2015. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AND
        EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Express Scripts,
        Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005, I, Edward Stiften,
        Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
        to
        the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)
        that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 
 BY: /s/
        Edward
        Stiften
 Edward
        Stiften
 Senior
        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 Express
        Scripts, Inc.
 
 Date:  October
        26, 2005
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Express Scripts, Inc. and will be retained by Express Scripts, Inc. and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
The Wiser Oil Company



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Wiser Oil Company (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard S. Davis, Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to sec.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification is made solely for the purpose of U.S.C. Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose.



/s/    RICHARD S.
DAVISRichard S. DavisVice President of Finance




March 26, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 501 

AN ACT 

To make technical corrections to the Navajo water rights 

settlement in the State of New Mexico, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 501 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Mexico Navajo 

3 Water Settlement Technical Corrections Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NAVAJO WATER SETTLEMENT. 

5 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 10302 of the Omnibus 

6 Public Land Management Act of 2009 (43 U.S.C. 407 

7 note; Public Law 111–11) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Arrellano’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘Arellano’’; and 

10 (2) in paragraph (27), by striking ‘‘75–185’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘75–184’’. 

12 (b) DELIVERY AND USE OF NAVAJO-GALLUP WATER

13 SUPPLY PROJECT WATER.—Section 10603(c)(2)(A) of 

14 the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Pub15 lic Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1385) is amended— 

16 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘Article III(c)’’ 

17 and inserting ‘‘Articles III(c)’’; and 

18 (2) in clause (ii)(II), by striking ‘‘Article III(c)’’ 

19 and inserting ‘‘Articles III(c)’’. 

20 (c) PROJECT CONTRACTS.—Section 10604(f)(1) of 

21 the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Pub22 lic Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1391) is amended by inserting 

23 ‘‘Project’’ before ‘‘water’’. 

24 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

25 10609 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

26 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1395) is amended— 
3 

†S 501 ES

1 (1) in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b), 

2 by striking ‘‘construction or rehabilitation’’ each 

3 place it appears and inserting ‘‘planning, design, 

4 construction, rehabilitation,’’; 

5 (2) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘2 percent’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘4 percent’’; and 

7 (3) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ‘‘4 percent’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘2 percent’’. 

9 (e) AGREEMENT.—Section 10701(e) of the Omnibus 

10 Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111– 

11 11; 123 Stat. 1400) is amended in paragraphs (2)(A), 

12 (2)(B), and (3)(A) by striking ‘‘and Contract’’ each place 

13 it appears. 

Passed the Senate May 21, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 501 

AN ACT 

To make technical corrections to the Navajo water 

and for other purposes. rights settlement in the State of New Mexico,
Order entered November 5, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00608-CR

No. 05-18-00609-CR

No. 05-18-00610-CR

BRANDON RASHAD BURTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F17-00846-U, F17-55788-U & F16-51151-U

ORDER

We REINSTATE these appeals.

When the reporter’s record was not timely filed, we abated for a hearing. Court reporter 

Sasha Brooks then tendered the four volumes of reporter’s record. In the interest of expediting 

these appeals and because the trial court has not yet held a hearing, we VACATE our October 

23, 2018 order to the extent it orders the trial court to hold a hearing. We ORDER the fourvolume reporter’s record filed as of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order, by electronic 

transmission, to the Honorable Stephanie Mitchell, Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District 
–2–

Court; Sasha Brooks, official court reporter, 291st Judicial District Court; and to counsel for the 

parties.

Appellant’s brief is DUE on or before December 3, 2018.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Wynn's International, Inc. of our report dated January 29, 1996,
included in the 1995 Annual Report to Stockholders of Wynn's International, Inc.

     Our audits also included the financial statement schedules of Wynn's
International, Inc. listed in Item 14(a).  These schedules are the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedules
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-68157) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1980
Stock Option and Appreciation Rights Plan and the 1982 Incentive Stock Option
Plan of Wynn's International, Inc., the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.
33-30296 and 33-64090) pertaining to the Wynn's International, Inc. Stock-Based
Incentive Award Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-53917)
pertaining to the Wynn's International, Inc. Non-Employee Directors' Stock
Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-53921) pertaining to
the Wynn's International, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and in the related
Prospectuses of our report dated January 29, 1996, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedules included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Wynn's
International, Inc.




                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Los Angeles, California
March 25, 1996