alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MARTIN-PARRY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The C. A. BADER COMPANY, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 3262.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

May 18, 1953.

Robert E. Ewing, Shipman & Goodwin, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff.

Gross, Hyde & Williams, Hartford, Conn., for defendant.

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Defendant moves to require the plaintiff to produce documents for inspection. Plaintiff objects for several stated reasons, of which the principal is the failure to show good cause under Rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A. This objection is well taken. A showing must be made as to each document requested. Mere reference to the pleadings is insufficient.

Moreover, so far as a portion of the material requested is originals, of which defendant has copies, a request for admission of genuineness under Rule 36 would appear sufficient for defendant’s purposes.

The motion for order to produce is denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; CTSA.                    

*Date:*                         September 26-27, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli Road, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carol Lambert, Ph.D., Acting Director, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing Translational, Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Democracy 1, Room 1076, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0814,                         *lambert@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, B—Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 15, 2017.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-17657 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
     John W. Hlywak, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
     pursuant to 18 U.S.C. /s/ 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
        Company.



                             /s/John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                ------------------------------
                                John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                December 27, 2006
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
March 24, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10977

AMERISTAR JET CHARTER, INC., Plaintiff - Appellee - Cross Appellant,

versus

SIGNAL COMPOSITES, INC., Etc.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

SUSANNE STEHR,

Defendant - Appellant - Cross Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas

3:01-CV-64-M

--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Susanne Stehr appeals from the district court’s judgment finding her liable to Ameristar Jet

Charter, Inc. for conspiracy to commit fraud and finding her jointly and severally liable to Ameristar

for $432, 099.60 in compensatory damages. Ameristar cross-appeals the damages award. After

reviewing the pleadings and hearing oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the district court for2

the following reasons:

1. The pretrial order provided adequate notice to Stehr of Ameristar’s clai m for

conspiracy to commit fraud. See Thrift v. Hubbard
, 44 F.3d 348, 356 (5th Cir. 1995)

(“Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a pleading, or pretrial order, need not

specify in exact detail every possible the o ry of recovery--it must only ‘give the

defendant fair notice of

what t he plaintiff's claim is and the grounds upon which it

rests.’”) (quoting Conley v. Gibson , 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)).

2. The district co urt did not clearly err in concluding that Durrani acted in a dual

capacity on behalf of Signal Composites, Inc. d/b/a Signal Aerospace (“Signal”) and

Aerospace Logisti cs. S ee F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 52(a). The district court’s finding is

supported by evidence in the record that Durran i wo rked for Signal as a business

consultant and that he was paid consulting fees through Aerospace Logistics.

3. There was sufficient ev idence presented at trial for the district court to reasonably

conclude that Stehr knowingly participated in the conspiracy to commit fraud. The

district court’s finding is not clearly erroneous. See id.

4. The district court did not clearly err in awarding damages. The district court’s

calculation of benefit-of-the-bargain damages i s plausible in light of conflicting

evidence in the record as to the value of the liners as represented. See St. Martin v.
Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S. Inc. , 224 F.3d 402, 410 (5th Cir. 2000).

For these reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit        31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

* *
* *

|                                                   |                                                                                      |                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|  Date:  April                  17, 2007 |                                                                                      |
|                                              |                                                                                 |                                   |
|                                                   |                                                                                      | /s/ Marvin                  S. Hausman |
|                                                   | Marvin                  S. Hausman                                                        |
|                                                   | Acting                  Principal Accounting and Financial                  Officer  |
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 538 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 538

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the operation of 
 longer combination vehicles on the Interstate System in the State of 
                     Idaho, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 2015

 Mr. Crapo (for himself and Mr. Risch) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the operation of 
 longer combination vehicles on the Interstate System in the State of 
                     Idaho, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Idaho Safe and Efficient Vehicle Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. LONGER COMBINATION VEHICLES IN IDAHO.

    Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j) Longer Combination Vehicles in Idaho.--No limit or other 
prohibition under this section, except as provided in this subsection, 
applies to a longer combination vehicle operating on a segment of the 
Interstate System in the State of Idaho if such vehicle--
            ``(1) has a gross vehicle weight of 129,000 pounds or less; 
        and
            ``(2) complies with the single axle, tandem axle, and 
        bridge formula limits set forth in subsection (a).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Arizona Gold and Onyx Mining Company f/k/a Viking Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
I, Michael Mitsunage, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



May 8, 2018



| | /s/
    Michael Mitsunage                  
| | -------------------------------------------
| | Michael
    Mitsunage                      
| | (Chief
    Executive Officer and President)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 13 THROUGH 18 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              15
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      142
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   168
<PP&E>                                              91
<DEPRECIATION>                                      41
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              163
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           266
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,063
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    25
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
         

        

        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 6, 2011 

d0829 

Order 

 

September 6, 2011 

142350(123) 

In re Estate of JEWELL ANDERSON, a 

Protected Person. 

_________________________________________ 

TIMOTHY FLYNN, Conservator of Jewell 

Anderson, a Protected Person 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 142350 

 COA: 292036 

Oakland PC: 2004-295192-GA 

DIANE ANDERSON, 

Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant, 

and 

DAVID C. ANDERSON, 

 Intervening Plaintiff. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 25, 

2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
|                              | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Alpine Village Holding, Inc.      | State of Delaware                       |
|                              |                                    |
| Alpine Village Apartments, L.L.C. | State of Delaware                       |
|                              |                                    |
| Belair Drive, LLC                 | State of Delaware                       |
|                              |                                    |
| Sunrise Ridge Holding, Inc.       | State of Delaware                       |
| Newark, NJ                        |                                    |
|                              |                                    |
| Sunrise Ridge, L.L.C.             | State of Delaware                       |
| Newark, NJ                        |                                    |
|                              |                                    |
| Van Buren Holding, Inc.           | State of Delaware                       |
|                              |                                    |
| Van Buren, L.L.C.                 | State of Delaware                       |
|                              |                                    |
| Wellington Holding, Inc.          | State of Delaware                       |
|                              |                                    |
| Wellington Apartments, L.L.C.     | State of Delaware                       |

----
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 23




                           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                                           
                                           
         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report 
(Form 10-K) of Wynn's International, Inc. of our report dated January 27, 
1997, included in the 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders of Wynn's 
International, Inc.
         
         Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Wynn's
International, Inc. in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of 
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based 
on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to 
above, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial 
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the 
information set forth therein.
         
         We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-68157) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1980 
Stock Option and Appreciation Rights Plan and the 1982 Incentive Stock Option 
Plan of Wynn's International, Inc., the Registration Statements 
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-30296 and 33-64090) pertaining to the Wynn's International, 
Inc. Stock-Based Incentive Award Plan, the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-53917) pertaining to the Wynn's International, Inc. 
Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-53921) pertaining to the Wynn's International, Inc. Employee 
Stock Purchase Plan, and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated 
January 27, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements 
incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding 
paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedules included in the 
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Wynn's International, Inc. for the year ended 
December 31, 1996.




                                    ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Los Angeles, California
March 21, 1997
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 235PA21
Filed 22 March 2024 NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

v.
LANIER LAW GROUP, P.A. , and LISA LANIER

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 31 of a unanimous decision
of the Court of Appeals, 277 N.C. App. 605 (202 1 ), affirming a n order granting summary judgment on 28 June 20 19 by Judge Susan E. Bray in Superior Court,
Guilford County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 2 1 Febru ary 202 4

.
Goldberg Segalla LLP, by David L. Brown and Martha P. Brown , for plaintiff

appell ee
. P into C oates K yre & B owers , P

LLC , by Richard L. Pinto and Matthew J. Millisor , for defendant

- appell ant s
.

PER CURIAM

. Justice D IETZ did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of A ppeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Batson v. Coastal Res. Comm'n , 385 N.C. 328, 892 S.E.2d 589 (2023) ( per curiam) (affirming by an equally divided vote a Court ofN.C. M UT

. F ARM B UREAU I NS

. C O

. V

. L ANIER L

. G RP ., P.A. Opinion of the Court

- 2

- Appeals decision leaving it as law of the case without further precedential value) ; Templeton Props. LP v. Town of Boone , 368 N.C. 82, 772 S.E.2d 239 (2015) (same);
Reese v. Barbee , 350 N.C. 60, 510 S.E.2d 374 (1999) (same).
AFFIRMED.
|   | (i)    | the      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));  and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|   | (ii)   | the      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Issuer.                                  |

| Dated:      November 6, 2009 |                                             |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                         | /s/      Ross A. Goolsby                         |
|                         | Ross      A. GoolsbyChief      Financial Officer |
<PAGE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of ESNI, Inc.;

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
ESNI, Inc. (formerly E-Sync Networks, Inc.), Nos. 33-7271 and 333-92933 on Form
S-8, of our report dated March 27, 2002, except as to note 1(c) which is as of
April 15, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of ESNI, Inc. as of
December 31, 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the two
year period ended December 31, 2001, which report is included in the 2001
annual report on Form 10-KSB.

Our report dated march 27, 2002, except as to note 1(c) which is as of April
15, 2002, contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations, has a working capital deficiency,
and has been notified by its primary source of funds that it is demanding
repayment of outstanding loans and that it does not intend to make future loans
available to the Company, all of which raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements
do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that
uncertainty.

                                                        /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                        ----------------------

New York, New York
April 15, 2002