alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  of Viking
Capital Group,  Inc. (the  "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  William J.  Fossen,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 14, 2003     /s/ William J. Fossen
                              ---------------------
                              William J. Fossen
                              Chief Executive Officer











                                                                              28
## ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA # 02-14-00064-CR OFFENSE: 22.021 Kevin D.Talkington v. The State of 

### STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Tarrant 

# 65WS"

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 213th District Court DATE: 04/30/15 Publish: NO TCCASE#: 1269829D

IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Kevin D.Talkington v. The State of 

### STYLE: Texas 

# APP£LLAA/T-l^ Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: OHl/L/^O/r ' 

# JUDGE: jfM &M*-^ CCA#: 

# £5JL7£ CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD

# UO-IS ELECTRONIC RECORD COA# 04-14-00367-CR OFFENSE: Murder Andres Alfredo Segovia v. The 

### STYLE: state ofTexas COUNTY: Bexar COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 399th District Court DATE:04/29/2015 Publish: YES TCCASE#: 2012CR8592



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD 

### STYLE: «Styie1» v. «Style2» CCA#: 

## APPELLANT'S* Petition 

### CCA Disposition: DATE: 

# &60-AT FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEWINCCA IS: 

# DATE: PAUL[/OtJT 

# JUDGE: P^CuL=. 

# y&t/i^.^/e^^ JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17863]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-17-037]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date:  August 30, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.

Place:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. No. 731-TA-1339 (Final) (Steel Concrete Reinforcing 
Bar from Taiwan). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and 
file its determination and views of the Commission by September 11, 
2017.
    5. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-382 and 731-TA-800, 801, and 803 (Third 
Review) (Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from Japan, Korea, and 
Taiwan). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its 
determinations and views of the Commission by September 20, 2017.
    6. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: August 16, 2017.
Katherine M. Hiner,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2017-17863 Filed 8-18-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7615

IRVIN E. COLEMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. O. WARD; J. TYLER, Captain; D. HODGES,

Superintendent,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CA-98-263-2)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Irvin E. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh McCoy Fain, III, Mary

Elizabeth Skora, SPOTTS, SMITH, FAIN & BUIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Irvin E. Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Coleman v. Ward, No. CA-98-263-2 (E.D. Va.

Nov. 17, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
      23.1




















**CONSENT
      OF
      INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**













We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-59618,
      333-121971, 333-124446 on
      Form S-3, and 333- 63101,
      333-71990,
      333-71992, 333-81134, 333-93193, 333-127890 and 333-127889 on Form S-8 of our
      report dated February 28, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial
      statements and financial statement schedules of WPS Resources Corporation and
      subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
      explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of new accounting standards) and
      of
      our report dated February 28, 2006 relating to management's report on the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of WPS Resources Corporation for the year ended
      December 31, 2005.






/s/
      Deloitte &
Touche LLP






Milwaukee,
      Wisconsin


February
      28,
      2006
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17879]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--First-Class Package Service Negotiated Service 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): August 24, 
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 17, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add First-Class Package 
Service Contract 78 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017-172, CP2017-273.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-17879 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 612 Referred in House (RFH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 612

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2015

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE P. KAZEN FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate May 21, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
exv4w1





Exhibit 4.1















 





AMERISTAR
CASINOS, INC.




     THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO
SO REQUESTS, A STATEMENT OF THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE,
PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL, OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES
THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRCITIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR
RIGHTS.



     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TEN COM

	 	—
	 	as tenants in common
	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT —
	 	 	 	Custodian	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	 	 

	 

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	(Cust)
	 	 	 	(Minor)
	 
	TEN ENT	 	—	 	as tenants by the entireties	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
	 
	JT TEN

	 	—
	 	as joint tenants with right
	 	 	 	Act 

	 

	 	 	 	of survivorship and not as

tenants in common
	 	 	 	 	 	(State)	 	 






Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list




     For Value Received,                                                              hereby
 sell, assign and transfer unto



PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE










 





 

Please print or typewrite name and address including postal zip code of assignee



 




 




 




Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint.  




 

Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Company with full
power of substitution in the premises.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated:

	 	 
 

	 	  





NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the
face of the Ceritificate, in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any
change whatever.
# national_M2019_dl

# Field Descriptions
* The Honorable James B. Loken became Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on April 1, 2003.

** The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-2610

___________ Valentino Maghee, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * John Ault, Warden, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 10, 2003 Filed: April 30, 2003

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, * Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Valentino Maghee, an inmate on work release at the Marshalltown Residential Facility in Marshalltown, Iowa, appeals the district court’s ** denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Maghee contends the district court should have excused his-2- failure to exhaust state remedies because initiating state postconviction proceedings in the absence of appointed counsel would have been futile. Having reviewed the district court’s findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo, we affirm the district court. Hall v. Luebbers , 296 F.3d 685, 692 (8 thCir. 2002) (standard of review). First, although Maghee asserts that he failed to pursue his habeas claims in state postconviction proceedings, this is not the case. Even though Maghee could not pay the filing fee, the county clerk’s office opened a case file for Maghee’s postconviction relief claims, and the state responded to Maghee’s claims. On July 12, 2002, the state trial court denied Maghee’s application for postconviction relief. Because Maghee did not appeal the July 12 judgment within the thirty-day limit established by state law, the district court properly concluded Maghee failed to exhaust state postconviction remedies. Maghee’s habeas petition is barred for this reason. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A) (2000). Second, even if Maghee had not pursued his claim through state postconviction proceedings, Maghee would not be entitled to an exception to the exhaustion requirement based on his assertion that initiating postconviction proceedings without the assistance of appointed counsel is “a waste of time.” See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(B)(ii) (state prisoner need not exhaust state remedies if “circumstances exist that render [state] process ineffective to protect the rights of the applicant”). Maghee has not shown the absence of counsel made the state process ineffective in his case. Although Maghee’s habeas claims might have been better presented in the state court if he had the benefit of counsel, the absence of appointed counsel at that stage of the proceedings does not violate Maghee’s federal constitutional rights, Miller v. Kemna , 207 F.3d 1096, 1097 (8 thCir. 2000) (per curiam), or even his state constitutional rights, Maghee v. State , 639 N.W. 2d 28, 30 (Iowa 2002).-3- We thus affirm the district court’s denial of habeas relief. We also grant Ault’s motion to supplement the record. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Order entered August 19, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 00465 - CV DOUGLAS SPICER, Appellant V. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMM ISSION, ET AL . , Appellee s On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, T exas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 12 - 09281 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s August 15, 2013 motion to extend time to file reply brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the reply brief tendered by appellant on August 9, 2013 be timely fil ed as of today’s date.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39618-39619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17634]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Duarte 
Nursery, Inc. and John Duarte, Civil Action Number 2:13-cv-02095-KJM-
DB, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Eastern 
District of California, Sacramento District, on August 15, 2017.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns an answer and counterclaim 
filed by the United States on May 7, 2014, against Duarte Nursery, Inc. 
and

[[Page 39619]]

John Duarte, pursuant to Sections 301(a) and 309(d) of the Clean Water 
Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a) and 1319(d), to obtain injunctive relief from 
and impose civil penalties against the Counterclaim-Defendants for 
violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a 
permit into waters of the United States. The proposed Consent Decree 
resolves these allegations by requiring the Counterclaim-Defendants to 
restore the impacted areas and/or perform mitigation and to pay a civil 
penalty.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Andrew Doyle, 
Senior Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division, Environmental Defense Section, Post Office 
Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044, and refer to United States v. Duarte 
Nursery, Inc. and John Duarte, DJ # 90-5-1-4-19984.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 
Sacramento District, 501 I Street, Room 4-200, Sacramento, CA 95814. In 
addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be examined electronically at 
http://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.

Cherie L. Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-17634 Filed 8-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
     I, Jay Higham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
     18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        1.  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.  The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                                /s/Jay Higham
                                   -----------------------------
                                   Jay Higham
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   August 6, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1998 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          21,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,294
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,109
<INVENTORY>                                    236,003
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               442,049
<PP&E>                                         704,832
<DEPRECIATION>                                 398,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,055,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          272,805
<BONDS>                                        577,478
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          145,293
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           706
<OTHER-SE>                                    (301,028)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,055,648
<SALES>                                      1,504,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,504,054
<CGS>                                        1,080,731
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,315,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                190,875
<INCOME-TAX>                                    64,898
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            122,293
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (4,326)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   117,967
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.75

</TABLE>