Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Proposed Rules 40503 

realize through net operating loss 

carrybacks, and significant investments 

in the capital of unconsolidated 

financial institutions in the form of 

common stock. Beginning January 1, 

2018, an FDIC-supervised institution 

that is not an advanced approaches 

FDIC-supervised institution must 

continue to apply the transition 

provisions described in paragraphs 

(b)(4)(i), (ii), and (iii) of this section 

applicable to calendar year 2017 to 

items that are subject to deduction 

under § 324.22(c)(4), (c)(5), and (d), 

respectively. 

* * * * * 

(d) Minority interest—(1) Surplus 

minority interest—(i) Advanced 

approaches FDIC-supervised institution 

surplus minority interest. Beginning 

January 1, 2014, through December 31, 

2017, an advanced approaches FDICsupervised institution may include in 

common equity tier 1 capital, tier 1 

capital, or total capital the percentage of 

the common equity tier 1 minority 

interest, tier 1 minority interest and 

total capital minority interest 

outstanding as of January 1, 2014 that 

exceeds any common equity tier 1 

minority interest, tier 1 minority interest 

or total capital minority interest 

includable under § 324.21 (surplus 

minority interest), respectively, as set 

forth in Table 9 to § 324.300. 

(ii) Non-advanced approaches FDICsupervised institution surplus minority 

interest. An FDIC-supervised institution 

that is not an advanced approaches 

FDIC-supervised institution may 

include in common equity tier 1 capital, 

tier 1 capital, or total capital 20 percent 

of the common equity tier 1 minority 

interest, tier 1 minority interest and 

total capital minority interest 

outstanding as of January 1, 2014 that 

exceeds any common equity tier 1 

minority interest, tier 1 minority interest 

or total capital minority interest 

includable under § 324.21 (surplus 

minority interest), respectively. 

* * * * * 

TABLE 9 TO § 324.300 

Transition period 

Percentage of the 

amount of surplus 

or non-qualifying 

minority 

interest that 

can be 

included in 

regulatory capital 

during the 

transition period 

Calendar year 2014 ........ 80 

Calendar year 2015 ........ 60 

Calendar year 2016 ........ 40 

Calendar year 2017 ........ 20 

TABLE 9 TO § 324.300—Continued 

Transition period 

Percentage of the 

amount of surplus 

or non-qualifying 

minority 

interest that 

can be 

included in 

regulatory capital 

during the 

transition period 

Calendar year 2018 and 

thereafter ..................... 0 

* * * * * 

Dated: August 2, 2017. 

Keith A. Noreika, 

Acting Comptroller of the Currency. 

By order of the Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System, August 16, 2017. 

Ann E. Misback, 

Secretary of the Board. 

Dated at Washington, DC this 9th of 

August, 2017. 

By order of the Board Directors. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17822 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0024; Product 

Identifier 2000–NE–12–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Safran 

Helicopter Engines, S.A., Turboshaft 

Engines 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede 

airworthiness directive (AD) 2013–11– 

09 that applies to all Safran Helicopter 

Engines, S.A., Arrius 2B1 and 2F 

turboshaft engines. Depending on the 

engine model, AD 2013–11–09 requires 

the repetitive replacement of the fuel 

injector manifolds and privilege 

injector, or only the privilege injector. 

Since we issued AD 2013–11–09, we 

received reports of engine flameouts as 

a result of reduced fuel flow due to the 

presence of coking. This proposed AD 

would retain the repetitive hardware 

replacement requirements of AD 2013– 

11–09, but only allow replacement pipe 

injector preferred assembly, part 

number (P/N) 0 319 73 044 0, on the 

Arrius 2F engines. We are proposing 

this AD to correct the unsafe condition 

on these products. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by October 10, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this NPRM, contact Safran Helicopter 

Engines, S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; 

phone: (33) 05 59 74 40 00; fax: (33) 05 

59 74 45 15. You may view this service 

information at the FAA, Engine and 

Propeller Standards Branch, Policy and 

Innovation Division, 1200 District 

Avenue, Burlington, MA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0024; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

mandatory continuing airworthiness 

information, regulatory evaluation, any 

comments received, and other 

information. The address for the Docket 

Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, 

ECO Branch, Compliance and 

Airworthiness Division, 1200 District 

Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 

781–238–7754; fax: 781–238–7199; 

email: robert.green@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 


pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
40504 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Proposed Rules 

FAA–2013–0024; Product Identifier 

2000–NE–12–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

On May 23, 2013, we issued AD 

2013–11–09, Amendment 39–17469 (78 

FR 32551, May 31, 2013), ‘‘AD 2013– 

11–09’’ for all Turbomeca S.A. Arrius 

2B, 2B1, and 2F turboshaft engines. 

Depending on the engine model, AD 

2013–11–09 requires the repetitive 

replacement of the fuel injector 

manifolds and privilege injector, or only 

the privilege injector. AD 2013–11–09 

resulted from a report that the corrective 

actions of AD 2001–08–14, R1, 

Amendment 39–14423 (71 FR 2993, 

January 19, 2006) were insufficient to 

eliminate the unsafe condition. We 

issued AD 2013–11–09 to prevent an 

engine flameout of Arrius 2B1 and 2F 

turboshaft engines and damage to the 

helicopter. 

Actions Since AD 2013–11–09 Was 

Issued 

Since we issued AD 2013–11–09, we 

received reports of engine flameouts as 

a result of reduced fuel flow due to the 

presence of coking. Also since we 

issued AD 2013–11–09, the European 

Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has 

issued AD 2017–0070, dated April 25, 

2017, which requires replacement of 

pipe injector preferred assemblies, P/N 

0 319 73 835 0, with improved 

assembly, P/N 0 319 73 044 0, on Arrius 

2F engines. 

Related Service Information 

We reviewed Safran Helicopter 

Engines, S.A., Service Bulletin (SB) No. 

319 73 4839, Version A, dated December 

13, 2016. The SB describes procedures 

for replacing pipe injector preferred 

assemblies. 

FAA’s Determination 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all the relevant information 

and determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of the same 

type design. 

Proposed AD Requirements 

This proposed AD would require, for 

Arrius 2B1 turboshaft engines, initial 

and repetitive replacement of the main 

fuel injector half-manifolds and 

preferred injector with a part eligible for 

installation within the compliance times 

specified. This proposed AD would also 

require, for Arrius 2F turboshaft 

engines, initial and repetitive 

replacement of the preferred injector 

and replacing pipe injector preferred 

assemblies, P/N 0 319 73 835 0, with 

assembly, P/N 0 319 73 044 0. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 50 Arrius 2B1 and 105 Arrius 2F 

turboshaft engines installed on 

helicopters of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this proposed AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Arrius 2B1 fuel injector manifolds and injector 

replacement.

3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 ............. $0 $255 $12,750 

Arrius 2F pipe injector preferred assembly replacement.3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 ............. 3,154 3,409 357,945 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

This AD is issued in accordance with 

authority delegated by the Executive 

Director, Aircraft Certification Service, 

as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. 

In accordance with that order, issuance 

of ADs is normally a function of the 

Compliance and Airworthiness 

Division, but during this transition 

period, the Executive Director has 

delegated the authority to issue ADs 

applicable to engines, propellers, and 

associated appliances to the Manager, 

Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 

Policy and Innovation Division. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this 

proposed AD would not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This proposed AD would not 

have a substantial direct effect on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national Government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that the proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska to the extent that it justifies 

making a regulatory distinction, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 


pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Proposed Rules 40505 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing airworthiness directive (AD) 

2013–11–09, Amendment 39–17469 (78 

FR 32551, May 31, 2013), and adding 

the following new AD: 

Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A. (Type 

Certificate previously held by 

Turbomeca S.A): Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0024; Product Identifier 2000–NE–12– 

AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by October 10, 

2017. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD supersedes AD 2013–11–09, 

Amendment 39–17469 (78 FR 32551, May 31, 

2013). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to all Turbomeca S.A. 

Arrius 2B1 and 2F turboshaft engines. 

(d) Subject 

Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) 

Code 7320, Fuel Controlling System. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by several reports 

of engine flameouts as a result of reduced 

fuel flow due to the presence of coking. We 

are issuing this AD to prevent an engine 

flameout of Arrius 2B1 and 2F turboshaft 

engines and damage to the helicopter. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Required Actions 

(1) For Arrius 2B1 turboshaft engines, do 

the following: 

(i) Replace each main fuel injector halfmanifold and preferred injector with a part 

eligible for installation before exceeding the 

operating hours (hours accumulated by the 

part since installation on an engine) specified 

in Figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD. 

FIGURE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (g)— 

REPLACEMENT

Part Operating 

hours 

Main fuel injector half-manifold—post-mod TU117 ...... 600 

Main fuel injector half-manifold—pre-mod TU117 ....... 200 

Preferred injector pre/postmod TU117 ....................... 200 

(ii) Borescope-inspect (BSI) the flame tube 

and the high-pressure turbine (HPT) area for 

turbine distress, when replacing the fuel 

injector manifolds and preferred injector for 

the first time. 

(iii) Thereafter, replace the fuel injector 

manifolds and preferred injector with a part 

eligible for installation before exceeding the 

operating hours (hours accumulated by the 

part since installation on an engine) specified 

in Figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD. 

(2) For Arrius 2F turboshaft engines, do the 

following: 

(i) Replace each pipe injector preferred 

assembly, part number (P/N) 0 319 73 835 0 

and P/N 0 319 73 044 0, with a part eligible 

for installation before exceeding 400 

operating hours (hours accumulated by the 

part since installation on an engine). 

(ii) BSI the flame tube and the HPT area 

for turbine distress, when replacing the 

privilege injector for the first time. 

(iii) Unless already accomplished as 

required by paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this AD, 

within 16 months after the effective date of 

this AD, replace the pipe injector preferred 

assembly, P/N 0 319 73 835 0, with a part 

eligible for installation before the next flight. 

(iv) Thereafter, replace the pipe injector 

preferred assembly with a part eligible for 

installation within 400 operating hours since 

the last pipe injector preferred assembly 

replacement. 

(h) Definitions 

(1) For Arrius 2B1 turboshaft engines, a 

main fuel injector half-manifold or preferred 

injector is eligible for installation if it has not 

exceeded the operating hours specified in 

Figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD since first 

installation on an engine or since last 

cleaning. 

(2) For Arrius 2F turboshaft engines, a pipe 

injector preferred assembly, P/N 0 319 73 044 

0, is eligible for installation if it has not 

exceeded 400 operating hours since first 

installation on an engine or since last 

cleaning. 

(i) Installation Prohibition 

(1) For Arrius 2B1 turboshaft engines, after 

the effective date of this AD, do not install 

a main fuel injector half-manifold or 

preferred injector onto any engine, or any 

engine onto a helicopter, unless the main fuel 

injector half-manifold and preferred injector 

are eligible for installation. 

(2) For Arrius 2F turboshaft engines, after 

the effective date of this AD, do not install 

a pipe injector preferred assembly onto any 

engine, or any engine onto a helicopter, 

unless the pipe injector preferred assembly is 

eligible for installation. 

(3) For Arrius 2F turboshaft engines, after 

the effective date of this AD, do not install 

a pipe injector preferred assembly, P/N 0 319 

73 835 0, onto any engine. 

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, FAA, ECO Branch, 

Compliance and Airworthiness Division, has 

the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, 

if requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ECO Branch, send it to 

the attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. You may email 

your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(k) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer, 

FAA, ECO Branch, Compliance and 

Airworthiness Division, 1200 District 

Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781– 

238–7754; fax: 781–238–7199; email: 

robert.green@faa.gov. 

(2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2017–0070, dated 

April 25, 2017, for more information. You 

may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by 

searching for and locating it in Docket No. 

FAA–2013–0024. 

(3) Safran Helicopter Engines S.A., SB No. 

319 73 4839, Version A, dated December 13, 

2016, can be obtained from Safran Helicopter 

Engines S.A., using the contact information 

in paragraph (k)(4) of this AD. 

(4) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Safran Helicopter Engines, 

S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; phone: (33) 05 59 

74 40 00; fax: (33) 05 59 74 45 15. 

(5) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards 

Branch, Policy and Innovation Division, 1200 

District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

August 18, 2017. 

Robert J. Ganley, 

Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards 

Branch, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17829 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2017–0805; Product 

Identifier 2017–NM–051–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for all The 

Boeing Company Model DC–9–81 (MD– 

81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD– 

83), DC–9–87 (MD–87) airplanes, Model 

MD–88 airplanes, and Model MD–90–30 

airplanes. This proposed AD was 

prompted by a report of loss of airspeed 


pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS