alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Years Ended December 31,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003(Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)Earnings:Income before income taxes
    
    $
    185,059
    
    
    $
    85,668
    
    
    $
    107,653
    
    
    $
    119,138
    
    
    $
    113,516Add:Fixed charges:Income on long-term debt
    
    
    46,828
    
    
    
    43,649
    
    
    
    38,164
    
    
    
    38,721
    
    
    
    37,144Other interest expense
    
    
    5,585
    
    
    
    3,824
    
    
    
    3,389
    
    
    
    3,368
    
    
    
    3,388Rental expense representative
of interest factor
    
    
    521
    
    
    
    693
    
    
    
    854
    
    
    
    1,002
    
    
    
    1,350Total fixed charges
    
    
    52,934
    
    
    
    48,166
    
    
    
    42,407
    
    
    
    43,091
    
    
    
    41,882Total earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    237,993
    
    
    $
    133,834
    
    
    $
    150,060
    
    
    $
    162,229
    
    
    $
    155,398Fixed charges
    
    $
    52,934
    
    
    $
    48,166
    
    
    $
    42,407
    
    
    $
    43,091
    
    
    $
    41,882Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    4.50
    
    
    
    2.78
    
    
    
    3.54
    
    
    
    3.76
    
    
    
    3.71
EXHIBIT
10.12
 
  
  You
  RECITALS
 Agreement
  ARTICLE
1
DEFINITIONS
 Arbitron
 Base Salary
 Board
 Disability
  Parent Corporation Parent Corporation




---



##### 



Separation from Service
 Subsidiary
 ARTICLE
2
EMPLOYMENT, DUTIES AND TERM
    ARTICLE
3
COMPENSATION AND EXPENSES
 Blended
Base Salary
  Common Stock Equity Plan




---



##### 



COBRA Coverage




---



##### 



(i)
    
    the product of your Final
Average Pay multiplied by your Years of Service through the
calendar year during which you attained age 62 multiplied by
..025 plus(ii)
    
    the product of your Final
Average Pay multiplied by your Years of Service following the
calendar year during which you attained age 62 multiplied by
..0167; over




---



##### 



Arbitron
 Determination Date
 Final Average Pay




---



##### 



Normal Form
 Offset Amount
 Retirement Plan
 Years of Service
 Predecessor Agreement
  ARTICLE
4
EARLY TERMINATION
 cause




---



##### 








---



##### 



ARTICLE
5
NON-COMPETITION, NON-RECRUITMENT, AND NON-DISPARAGEMENT
   Restrictive Period shareholder Arbitrons
business affiliate




---



##### 



ARTICLE
6
GENERAL PROVISIONS
    (a)
    
    ARBITRON INC.
9705 Patuxent Woods Drive
Columbia, Maryland 21046
Attention: Chief Legal Officer(b)
    
    To you:At your last address on the records of Arbitron




---



##### 



Arbitron and you each hereby irrevocably waive any
right to a trial by jury in any action, suit or other legal proceeding arising under or relating to
any provision of this Agreement.
    Section 409A New Payment Date short term deferral period
  Payments




---



##### 



Excise Tax Gross-Up
Payment
 Accounting Firm Accounting
Firm
 Underpayment
  (i)
    
    give Arbitron any information reasonably requested by Arbitron
relating to such claim;(ii)
    
    take such action in connection with contesting such claim as Arbitron
shall reasonably request in writing from time to time, including accepting legal
representation with respect to such claim by an attorney reasonably selected by
Arbitron;(iii)
    
    cooperate with Arbitron in good faith in order to effectively
contest such claim; and(iv)
    
    permit Arbitron to participate in any proceedings relating to such
claim;




---



##### 








---



##### 



EXECUTIVE
    
    
    
    ARBITRON INC./s/ Stephen B. Morris
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ William T. KerrStephen B. Morris
    
    
    
    William T. KerrTitle: Chair, Compensation and HumanResources Committee
directorfeeschedule.htm


    Director
Compensation

    Committee
Approved February 17, 2009

    Board
Approved February 17, 2009

    Effective
May1, 2009

    


    Board of Director
Retainer:

    Outside
directors to receive an annual retainer of $32,200 to be paid in a combination
of cash and restricted stock..

    


    Cash:  A monthly
cash payment of $2,100 ($25,200 annually) to be paid at the beginning of the
month following the month of service.  Directors may miss a maximum of
two scheduled board meetings without penalty.

    


    Restricted
Stock:  Annually, subject to full board approval, timing and
vesting qualifications, outside directors will receive an equity award
(restricted stock) with an economic value of $7,000.

    


    Special Service
Retainer

    Special
quarterly service retainers are paid the month following the end of the quarter
for the following service

    


    Board
Chair $2,800

    Audit
Chair $2,500

    Compensation
Chair $1,500

    Governance/Nominating
Chair $1,500

    ALCO
Chair $1,500

    Executive
committee members $1,500

    (Eligible
if non-employee and not receiving Chair

    Retainer)

    


    Committee
Meetings

    In addition to the annual retainer,
attendance at committee meetings entitles outside directors to additional
compensation in the amount of $200 for attendance at scheduled “in-person”
committee meetings and $100 for telephone meetings.

    


    Telephone Board
Meetings

    Occasionally
it is necessary to call a telephone meeting of the board of
directors.  Directors attending these meetings are entitled to
$100.
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ George                Paz                           |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | George                Paz                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|   |   | Chairman, President                  and Chief Executive                  Officer                                                                                                         |   |
|   |   | Express                Scripts, Inc.                                                                                                                                                           |   |

| Date:                July 25, 2007 |
|----------------------------------------------|
No. 1008.

#### Jordan *v.*Federal Farm Mortgage Corporation et al.

May 27, 1946.

*G. P. North*for petitioner.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is dismissed for failure to comply with the Rules.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17790]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Cell Biology Integrated Review Group; Nuclear 
and Cytoplasmic Structure/Function and Dynamics Study Section.
    Date: September 18, 2017.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Pier 2620 Hotel, 2620 Jones Street, San Francisco, CA 
94133.
    Contact Person: David Balasundaram, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5189, MSC 7840, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1022, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e0c0f020f1d1b000a0f1c0f030a2e0d1d1c4000070640090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8dad9d4d9cbcdd6dcd9cad9d5dcf8dbcbca96d6d1d096dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Risk Prevention and Health Behavior AREA Review.
    Date: September 18, 2017.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: John H Newman, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3222, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
0628, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc92998b919d929694bc9f8f8ed2929594d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9d7dcced4d8d7d3d1f9dacacb97d7d0d197ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 17, 2017.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-17790 Filed 8-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Blowers *v.*One Wire Rope Cable and New York Wire Rope Co.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

August 1, 1884.)

1. Contract—Mutual Performance.

When two acts are to be done concurrently by parties under a contract, t-lie obligation on the part of each is dependent upon that of the other, and the act of each is done upon implied condition of performance by the other.

2. Estoppel—Seizure of Boat—Assertion of Failure to Earn, when Plaintiff the Cause.

"The vendor of a cargo delivered by him on libelant’s boat, to he carried by libelant for a third party, appropriated the boat in order to coerce payment from such party of the purchase price of the cargo. The vessel owner having libeled the cargo, *held,*that the vendor, who intervened as claimant, was es-topped from claiming that the libelant had not earned freight.

In Admiralty. ,

*T. C. Campbell,*for libelant.

*Scudder & Carter,*for claimant.

Wallace, J.

There is nothing in the terms of the contract between the' libelant and the Cable Towing Company necessarily inconsistent with the intentions of the parties to recognize the existence of a lien of the libelant upon the cable for his freight. Payment of the freight was to be made by the Cable Towing Company concurrently with the delivery of the cargo, although the libelant was to commence delivery before payment. The contract provided for a peculiar mode of delivery of the cargo, but it does not differ otherwise essentially from the common contract for the payment of freight upon delivery. Where two acts are to be done concurrently by parties under a contract, the obligation on the part of each is dependent upon that of the other, and the act of each is done upon the implied condition of performance by the other.

The Wire Rope Company, the claimant, prevented the libelant from performing his contract with the Cable Towing Company and earning his freight. The claimant knew, or had notice equivalent to knowledge, of the terms of the contract between libelant and the Cable Towing Company, and knew that the libelant was not the agent of that company in receiving the cable. The claimant also knew that by appropriating libelant’s boat in order to coerce the Cable Towing Company to pay for the cable, the libelant would be prevented from performing his contract with that company, and from earning his freight. The circumstance that the claimant had the right to thus compel payment of the Cable Towing Company as against that company, does not affect the rights of the libelant, because as against him the claimant had no such right. Under such circumstances the libelant is not to be placed in a worse condition through the conduct of the claimant than he would occupy if he had been permitted to perform his contract and earn his freight. The claimant should, therefore, be deemed estopped from asserting that the libelant did not earn his freight.

The decree of the district court is affirmed, with costs of this appeal.
No. 995.

#### Small *v.*United States.

May 6, 1946.

*Max H. Margolis*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General McGrath*and *Robert S. Erdahl*for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,585,000<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  296,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 49,865,000<F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,349,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 845,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,210,000<F3>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,387,000
<BONDS>                                     27,495,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       746,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,582,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,210,000
<SALES>                                     82,061,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            82,061,000
<CGS>                                       66,322,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               66,322,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,628,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,111,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,459,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,652,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,652,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
<FN>
<F1>CASH INCLUDES $589,000 RESTRICTED CASH
<F2>INVENTORY INCLUDES HOMES UNDER CONSTRUCTION $23,349,000 MODEL HOMES AND
FURNISHINGS $4,760,000 LAND DEVELOPMENT $17,859,000 AND UNPLATTED LAND
$3,897,000
<F3>TOTAL ASSETS INCLUDES OTHER ASSETS OF $2,960,000
</FN>


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00318-CV

In re Teerachai Supakorndej

FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-FM-18-003565, THE HONORABLE J. ANDREW HATHCOCK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Teerachai Supakorndej petitions for a writ of mandamus to vacate a 

temporary order requiring him to pay $15,000 in attorney’s fees to counsel for his ex-wife, real 

party in interest Shang Xu.1 See Tex. Fam. Code § 109.001(a)(5). Supakorndej bears the burden 

to present this Court with a record sufficient to demonstrate his right to mandamus relief. 

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Based on this record, we 

deny relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a) (providing that mandamus record must contain, among 

other things, “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim 

for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding” and “properly authenticated” copies of

“any exhibits offered in evidence”).2

1 Relator appealed the results of the divorce to this Court in cause No. 03-20-0177-CV.

2 We dismiss as moot Xu’s “Motion to Deny Petition for Writ of Mandamus” and 

alternative motion to strike.
2

__________________________________________

Edward Smith, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Smith

Filed: January 7, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                             190
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                        53
<INVENTORY>                                      3,173
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,927
<PP&E>                                          12,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,127
<BONDS>                                          5,115
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,461
<SALES>                                         21,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,547
<CGS>                                           19,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    11
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (362)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (636)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (636)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.39)


</TABLE>
#### WELCH v. JOSLYN.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

June 17, 1903.)

No. 1,922.

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

Carlos S. Andrews, for plaintiff in error. Connell & Ives, for defendant in error.

Dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, pursuant to stipulation of the parties.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of DiversiFax, Inc. (the "Company")
for the quarter ended February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:

         1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:    September 19, 2005

By:      /s/ Irwin A. Horowitz
         ---------------------
         Dr. Irwin A. Horowitz, Chief Executive
         Officer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject
to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates by reference.