alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4321-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for State of Nebraska (FEMA-4321-DR), dated June 26, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued July 6, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Dolph A. Diemont, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of David G. Samaniego as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-17741 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
No. 520.

No. 796.

No. 967.

#### Pope *v.*United States (327 U. S. 813) ; Farrell *v.*Massachusetts (327 U. S. 819) ; and Autocar Sales *&*Service Co. *v.*Leonard et al., Trustees *(ante,*p. 878).

May 27, 1946.

Second petitions for rehearing denied.
Locations of Business Establishments Relative to the Path
of Hurricane Katrina in Louisiana, Mississippi, & Alabama

Gulf of Mexico

September 2005

Locations Within 100 Miles of the Path
Employers | 26% of Combined

State Totals
Employees | 26% of Combined
1,140,518 State Totals

Total Wages | 25% of Combined
$9,908,274,538 State Totals

Locations Within 200 Miles of the Path
Employers | 53% of Combined

134,657 State Totals
Employees | 54% of Combined
2,343,018 State Totals

Total Wages | 53% of Combined)
$19,454,321, 182 State Totals

Additional Information

Data Notes
Employment information is from December 2004.
Wages are total paid for Fouth Quarter 2008
~Some employers reported zero employment
andlor zero wages during 4th Quarter,
~Data is based on employers for vic
accurate physical locations were available
Data is trom combined totals for LA, MS, and AL.

Data Sources:

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
(QCEW), developed through a cooperative
‘program between the states and the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. www.bls.gov

Cartography and Analysis

Missouri Economic Research
‘and Information Center (MERIC),
‘Missouri Dept. of Economic Development
www missourieconomy. org

iy
of Mao,

Bure,
ote,
asiy®
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Nathan G. Leaphart III, CPA, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of GlassmasterCompany;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and   c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting;5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    Dated:     June 13, 2006       /s/ Nathan G. Leaphart III, CPA     Nathan G. Leaphart III, CPA
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR17-20-000]


Laramie River DevCo LP; Notice of Request for Temporary Waiver

    Take notice that on August 11, 2017, pursuant to Rule 204 of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.204, Laramie river DevCo LP filed a petition 
for temporary waiver of the tariff filing and reporting requirements of 
sections 6 and 20 of the Interstate Commerce Act and parts 341 and 357 
of the Commission's regulations for a new crude petroleum gathering 
system to be located in the Colorado, as more fully explained in the 
petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cc8a899e8f83a2a0a5a2a99fb9bcbca3beb88caaa9beafe2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bdddec9d8d4f5f7f2f5fec8eeebebf4e9efdbfdfee9f8b5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on August 25, 2017.

    Dated: August 16, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17728 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 552 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 552

   To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to provide for 
 increased limitations on leverage for multiple licenses under common 
                                control.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 2015

   Mr. Risch (for himself, Mr. Cardin, Ms. Ayotte, and Mrs. Shaheen) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to provide for 
 increased limitations on leverage for multiple licenses under common 
                                control.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Investment Capital 
Company Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED LIMITATIONS ON LEVERAGE FOR MULTIPLE LICENSES UNDER 
              COMMON CONTROL.

    Section 303(b)(2) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 
U.S.C. 683(b)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ``$225,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$350,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Ipswich Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy
L. Felter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"). In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32),
this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B)
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.

/s/ Timothy L. Felter
------------------------------
Timothy L. Felter
Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2006
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Donald P. Gill, hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First Ipswich
Bancorp;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
we have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
      including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
      within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
      quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our
      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
      procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report
      based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business
      issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
      the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
      issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the
equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
      to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
      internal controls over financial reporting.


/s/ Donald P. Gill
----------------------------------
Donald P. Gill
Chief Executive Officer

May 13, 2005
#### MONTAGE FURNITURE SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REGENCY FURNITURE, INCORPORATED; Sammy Furniture, Incorporated; Sammy Furniture of Catonsville, Incorporated; Sammy Furniture Of Easton, Incorporated; Sammy Furniture of Frederick, Incorporated; Sammy Furniture of Golden Ring, Incorporated; Sammy Furniture of Hagerstown, Incorporated; Sammy Furniture of Laurel, Incorporated; Sammy Furniture of Pasadena, Incor*202porated; Sammy Home Store of Frederick, Incorporated; Sammy Home Store of Hagerstown, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-1715.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 19, 2012.

Decided: Jan. 4, 2013.

Derek P. Roussillon, Miles & Stock-bridge, PC, Baltimore, Maryland; Brian J. Masternak, David S. Ludington, Warner, Norcross & Judd, LLP, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant. Jonathan A. Azrael, Azrael, Franz, Schwab & Lipowitz, LLC, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Montage Furniture Services, LLC (“Montage”) appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On appeal, Montage argues that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on its claim for unjust enrichment. We affirm.

We review whether a district court erred in granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same legal standards as the district court. *Martin v. Lloyd,*700 F.3d 132, 135 (4th Cir.2012). Summary judgment is only appropriate where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. *Id.*“On a motion for summary judgment, facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party only if there is a genuine dispute as to those facts.” *Ricci v. DeStefano,*557 U.S. 557, 586, 129 S.Ct. 2658, 174 L.Ed.2d 490 (2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). “Where the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party, there is no genuine issue for trial.” *Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.,*475 U.S. 574, 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986) (internal quotation marks omitted).

We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment on Montage’s unjust enrichment claim. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>
 
                                EXHIBIT 21 (a)
                                        
                   Subsidiaries of OXIS International, Inc.

As of December 31, 1998, the Company's subsidiaries were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
           Name              Jurisdiction of incorporation
           ----              -----------------------------
  <S>                                <C>
  OXIS Health Products, Inc.         Delaware
  OXIS Therapeutics, Inc.            Delaware
  OXIS International S.A.            France
  OXIS Acquisition Corporation       Delaware
  OXIS Isle of Man Limited           Isle of Man
  OXIS Instruments, Inc.             Pennsylvania
</TABLE>

                                      51
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 30, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40995 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaint iffAppellee,
versus RAUL MANUEL MEDINA-MEDINA, DefendantAppellant.

------------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-1828-ALL

------------------------------------------------------------- Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Raul Manuel Medina-Medina (Medina) appeals his conviction and sentence fo r illegal reentry . Medina argues, and the Government correctl y concedes, that the district court plainly erred in assessing a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) on the basis of Medina’s-2-

19 96 Texas conviction for retaliation; therefore, his sentence should be vacated and his case remanded fo r resent e ncing. See United States v. Martinez-Mata , 393 F.3d 625, 628-29 (5th Cir. 2004). Medina’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is fo reclosed by Almendarez-Torres
v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Alt hough Medina contends that A lmendarez-Torres was inco rrectl y decided and that a majo rity of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments
on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir. 2005). Medina properly concedes that his argument is foreclo sed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

ZENITH
NATIONAL INSURANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(As of December 31, 2007)

Zenith
National Insurance Corp. (a Delaware corporation)
                Zenith National Insurance Capital Trust I (a Delaware statutory trust)
                Zenith Development Corp. (a Nevada corporation)

Zenith
Insurance Company (a California corporation)
                                ZNAT Insurance Company (a California corporation)
                                Zenith Insurance Management Services, Inc. (a Florida
corporation)
                                1390 Main Street LLC (a Delaware limited liability
company)
                                Zenith of Nevada, Inc. (a Nevada corporation)

Each
subsidiary shown is wholly-owned by the subsidiary shown in the tier above it.

---



QuickLinks