alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21(i)

                           CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

                 CRAIG CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiary                                         Incorporation  Ownership %
----------                                         -------------  -----------
<S>                                               <C>             <C>
Craig Management, Inc. .......................... California, USA     100%
Dimension Specialty Company...................... Delaware, USA       100%
James J. Cotter & Associates, Inc. .............. California, USA     100%
Craig Food and Hospitality, Inc. ................ Delaware, USA       100%
Reading Entertainment, Inc. ..................... Nevada, USA          78%
Citadel Holdings Corporation..................... Nevada, USA     32.38%/32.83%*
</TABLE>
--------
* The Company has 32.38% direct and indirect interest in the common stock of
  Citadel Holding Corporation and has 32.83% voting power of Citadel Holding
  Corporation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,693
<PP&E>                                       1,402,437
<DEPRECIATION>                                 518,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,075,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,817
<BONDS>                                        372,228
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     459,459
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,075,567
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,219
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  131,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 92,428
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,101
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    59,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00254-CR

Clinton Ray Sanders

v.

The State of Texas

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

From the 355th District Court

of Hood County (CR12349) 

January 30, 2014

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

Dissent by Justice Gardner 

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _ /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A1 72 5 . W I LLI AMS v . STATE.

Ap p el l an t h as fi l ed a m o t i o n f o r ex t en s i o n o f t i m e t o su b m it bri ef an d

en u m erat i o n o f erro rs

. In h i s m o t i o n , ap p el lan t req u es t s an ex t en s i o n of t i m e t o al l o w

ap p el l at e co un s el t o b e ap p o i nt ed fo r ap p el l an t

. Becau se i t d o es ap p ear fro m t h e

r e c o rd t h at ap p el l an t d i d at t em p t t o req u es t in d i g en t ap pel l an t co u n s el i n t h e t r i a l

co u rt , we h ereb y rem an d t hi s cas e t o t h e t ri al c o u r t f o r i t t o d et erm i n e wh et h er to

ap p oi n t t h e ap p el l an t co un s el

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. July 27, 2021

07/27/2021
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Hospital Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gary D.Blackford, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)        The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  August 13, 2008                              |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                     |   |
| /s/  Gary D. Blackford                                   |   |
|      Gary  D. Blackford         |   |
|      Chairman  of the Board and |   |
|      Chief  Executive Officer   |   |

 

----
#  Elevation of U.S. Cyber Command to a Unified Combatant Command

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

Pursuant to my authority as the Commander in Chief and under sections 161 and 167b of title 10, United States Code, and in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, I direct that U.S. Cyber Command be established as a Unified Combatant Command. I also direct the Secretary of Defense to recommend an officer for my nomination and Senate confirmation as commander in order to establish U.S. Cyber Command as a Unified Combatant Command.

I assign to U.S. Cyber Command: (1) all the general responsibilities of a Unified Combatant Command; (2) the cyberspace-related responsibilities previously assigned to the Commander, U.S. Strategic Command; (3) the responsibilities of Joint Force Provider and Joint Force Trainer; and (4) all other responsibilities identified in section 167b of title 10, United States Code. The comprehensive list of authorities and responsibilities for U.S. Cyber Command will be included in the next update to the Unified Command Plan.

I further direct that the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, provide a recommendation and, as appropriate, a plan to me regarding the future command relationship between the U.S. Cyber Command and the National Security Agency.

Consistent with section 161(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, you are directed to notify the Congress on my behalf.

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2017-17947

Billing code 5001-06-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. 24-0013

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL ROSS TROMBLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until April 10, 2024, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 5 2024

03/05/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0013
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of Anchor BanCorp
Wisconsin Inc. (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Chris BauerChris Bauer, President and Chief Executive Officer


August 9, 2012

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc. and will be retained by Anchor
BanCorp Wisconsin Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned officer of Chittenden Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2004 to which this certification is
being furnished as an exhibit (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item
601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: February 18, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    KIRK W. WALTERS                              
|                         |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### In re: Bobby Ernest FINCH; Donna Lynn Finch, Debtors. Bobby Ernest Finch; Donna Lynn Finch, Appellants, v. David D. Coop, U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee; Matthew Wayne Adlong; William Clay Brazil; Caroline Winningham; Joe Don Winningham; Gary Dewayne Jiles; James E. Goldie; First State Bank; First Security Bank; Bank of the Ozarks; Dixie Furniture Company, Inc.; Paul A. Schmidt; Mark T. McCarty, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellees.

No. 09-3311.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 19, 2010.

Filed: May 26, 2010.

Bobby Ernest Finch, Poplar Grove, AR, pro se.

Donna Lynn Finch, Poplar Grove, AR, pro se.

Judy Simmons Henry, Wright & Lindsey, Little Rock, AR, Donald E. Knapp, Jr., Knapp Law Firm, Helena, AR, for Appellees.

Matthew Wayne Adlong, Brazil & Ad-long, Conway, AR, pro se.

Gary Dewayne Jiles, Jack & Lyon, Conway, AR, pro se.

James E. Goldie, Davis & Goldie, Harrison, AR, pro se.

Paul A. Schmidt, Cabot, AR, pro se.

*577Before LOKEN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Proceeding pro se and in forma pauper-is, Bobby and Donna Finch appeal the district court’s1 adverse order and judgment dismissing their underlying appeal from several bankruptcy court2 orders. Upon careful review, *see Fix v. First State Bank of Roscoe,*559 F.3d 803, 808 (8th Cir.2009) (this court reviews bankruptcy court’s legal determinations de novo and its findings of fact for clear error; when bankruptcy court’s judgment is appealed to district court, district court acts as appellate court; as second court of appellate review, this court conducts independent review of bankruptcy court’s judgment, applying same standards of review as district court), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we deny the pending motions, and we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

2

. The Honorable Richard D. Taylor, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
#### GEORGE FROST CO. v. CRANDALL WEDGE CO.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

April 16, 1903.)

1. Patents—Suit for Infringement—Preliminary Injunction.

Where a complainant’s patent has been sustained by an appellate court, he is entitled to a preliminary injunction against a new infringer, notwithstanding the presentation by defendant of alleged anticipatory patents, which were not before the court in the prior suit, unless it appears that they are of such character as would probably have led to a different decision.

In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On motion for preliminary injunction.

Charles Neave, for complainant.

W. P. Preble, Jr., for defendant.

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

There are prior patents in this record, which were not before the courts in the earlier suit; but, comparing them with those which were then considered, this court does not feel warranted in assuming that their presence in the earlier suit would have induced a different construction of the patent. As to the general equities, a complainant who has the decision of an appellate court, sustaining a construction of the patent on final hearing, is ordinarily entitled to an injunction against a new infringer, although such infringer was ignorant of his claim. The defendant’s hose supporter, as such, does not infringe; and it is, thought that a modification of the button or stud which engages with the stocking will avoid infringement, and leave defendant free to make and sell its supporter. Preliminary injunction will issue under the first claim. Inasmuch, however, as complainant has deprived itself of.the power to license the use of its button or stud on defendant’s noncompeting hose supporter, *105the operation of injunction will be stayed until the close of the May session of the Court of Appeals, so as to allow defendant to present its additional prior patents to that court.
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                         (18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted)

         In  connection  with the Annual  Report of DG  Liquidation  Inc.'s (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending July 31, 2001, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Harold
Blumenkrantz,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company and Gerald
Koblin,  Secretary,  Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted),

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 14, 2004                         /s/ Harold Blumenkrantz
                                             --------------------------------
                                             Harold Blumenkrantz, President and
                                             Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  July 14, 2004                        /s/ Gerald
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Gerald Koblin, Secretary,
                                             Treasurer and Chief  Financial and
                                             Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                       7,312,824
<SECURITIES>                                 9,295,232
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,256,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (846,890)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,889,528
<PP&E>                                       6,228,347
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,121,229)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,449,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,107,915
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,542
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,871,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,449,568
<SALES>                                      3,654,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,268,543
<CGS>                                          391,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,452,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                992,068
<INCOME-TAX>                                   280,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            712,068
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   712,068
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
**STATSURE        DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC. FORMERLY SALIVA DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS,        INC.**

**March        31, 2005**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. for                the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and                Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A                of                StatSure Diagnostic Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,                2005                fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and                results of operations of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO                 SECTION 302(a) OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,  ChiefFinancial Officer of Gulf Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)[intentionally omitted as per SEC Release 33-8238];

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date: August 13, 2007 | /s/ Ming Li                                                                 |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |  
Name: 

Ming Li
 
Title: 

Chief Financial Officer

  |