alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17771]

[[Page 39786]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 18, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Guaranty Bancorp, Inc., Denver, Colorado; to merge with Castle 
Rock Bank Holding Company, and thereby indirectly acquire Castle Rock 
Bank, both of Castle Rock, Colorado.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 17, 
2017.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-17771 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to thebest of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2004 of Graphic Packaging Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’) filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|   | /s/ JOHN T.  BALDWIN                                       |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: John.  T. Baldwin                                    |
|   | Title:  Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  August 5, 2004                                 |

 

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of The Finish Line, Inc. (the Company), for purposes
of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended May 29, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78); and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 24, 2010



|    |                         |                  
|--- | ----------------------- | -----------------
|By: |                         | /s/ Glenn S. Lyon
|    |                         | Glenn S. Lyon    
|    | Chief Executive Officer



|    |                                                   |                      
|--- | ------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------
|By: |                                                   | /s/ Edward W. Wilhelm
|    |                                                   | Edward W. Wilhelm    
|    | Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial
Officer
|   

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to The Finish Line, Inc. and will be retained by The Finish Line, Inc. and forwarded to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS, CONSOLIDATED CAPITALIZATION STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      191,075
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        113
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          27,720
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         3,270
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  15,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,500
<COMMON>                                        24,757
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             66,623
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  91,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            64,664
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   1,925
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  79,531
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  237,500
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      163,809
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             8,404
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     135,959
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     144,363
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         19,446
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,642
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  22,088
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         5,741
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,347
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   16,347
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         9,971
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        4,937
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          30,215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6034** 

KEITH JAMES SEARS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. SUSAN WHITE , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Dever, III , Chief District Judge. ( 5:14

- hc

- 02230

- D )

Submitted : April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Keith James Sears, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keith James Sears seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying the various post judgment motions Sears filed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) p roceeding . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional c laims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedu ral ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Sears has not made the requisite showing. Accordingl y, although we grant Sears’ motion to amend his informal brief, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Sears’3 motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
#### In the Matter of: Neil Martin ROSE, Debtor. Neil Martin Rose, Appellant, v. Richard M. Ruggerio; et al., Appellees.

No. 08-60034.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2010.*

Filed April 21, 2010.

Neil Martin Rose, Scottsdale, AZ, pro se.

Jean Marie McCoy, Esquire, Lander-holm Law Firm, Vancouver, WA, Timothy William Dore, Ryan, Swanson & Cleveland, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellees.

Kathryn Ellis, Seattle, WA, pro se.

Before: RYMER, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Neil Martin Rose, a Chapter 7 debtor, appeals pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment, removing a lis pendens recorded by Rose against property sold by the bankruptcy trustee, and enjoining Rose from filing other documents clouding title to the property without prior court approval. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s decision, *Sigma Micro Corp. v. Healthcentral.com**609*(In re Heatlhcentral.com),*504 F.3d 775, 783 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly canceled the invalid lis pendens. *See*Wash. Rev. Code § 4.28.325 (providing that a court may cancel a lis pendens upon a showing of good cause).

The bankruptcy court properly enjoined Rose from filing documents clouding title to the property without prior court approval. *See Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.,*500 F.3d 1047, 1056-62 (9th Cir.2007) (affirming pre-filing review orders where litigant received notice and an opportunity to be heard, there was an adequate record on appeal for review, the court found the litigant’s actions frivolous and harassing, and the order was narrowly tailored).

We reject Rose’s contention that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction because his allegations, even if true, do not affect jurisdiction.

Rose’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

The Chapter 7 trustee’s motion to be dismissed as a party to this appeal is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 565 

AN ACT 

To reduce the operation and maintenance costs associated 

with the Federal fleet by encouraging the use of remanufactured parts, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 565 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Vehicle Repair 

3 Cost Savings Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds that, in March 2013, the Government 

6 Accountability Office issued a report that confirmed 

7 that— 

8 (1) there are approximately 588,000 vehicles in 

9 the civilian Federal fleet; 

10 (2) Federal agencies spent approximately 

11 $975,000,000 on repair and maintenance of the 

12 Federal fleet in 2011; 

13 (3) remanufactured vehicle components, such as 

14 engines, starters, alternators, steering racks, and 

15 clutches, tend to be less expensive than comparable 

16 new replacement parts; and 

17 (4) the United States Postal Service and the 

18 Department of the Interior both informed the Gov19 ernment Accountability Office that the respective 

20 agencies rely on the use of remanufactured vehicle 

21 components to reduce costs. 

22 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

23 In this Act— 

24 (1) the term ‘‘Federal agency’’ has the meaning 

25 given that term in section 102 of title 40, United 

26 States Code; and 
3 

†S 565 ES

1 (2) the term ‘‘remanufactured vehicle compo2 nent’’ means a vehicle component (including an en3 gine, transmission, alternator, starter, turbocharger, 

4 steering, or suspension component) that has been re5 turned to same-as-new, or better, condition and per6 formance by a standardized industrial process that 

7 incorporates technical specifications (including engi8 neering, quality, and testing standards) to yield fully 

9 warranted products. 

10 SEC. 4. REQUIREMENT TO USE REMANUFACTURED VEHI11 CLE COMPONENTS. 

12 The head of each Federal agency— 

13 (1) shall encourage the use of remanufactured 

14 vehicle components to maintain Federal vehicles, if 

15 using such components reduces the cost of maintain16 ing the Federal vehicles while maintaining quality; 

17 and 

18 (2) shall not encourage the use of remanufac19 tured vehicle components to maintain Federal vehi20 cles, if using such components— 

21 (A) does not reduce the cost of maintain22 ing Federal vehicles; 

23 (B) lowers the quality of vehicle perform24 ance, as determined by the employee of the 
4 

†S 565 ES

1 Federal agency responsible for the repair deci2 sion; or 

3 (C) delays the return to service of a vehi4 cle. 

Passed the Senate June 15, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 565 

AN ACT 

To reduce the operation and maintenance costs aspurposes. the use of remanufactured parts, and for other sociated with the Federal fleet by encouraging
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 158 / Thursday, August 17, 2017 / Notices 39157 

maintenance, and purchase of services 

to provide the requested information. 

Approved: August 8, 2017. 

L. Brimmer, 

Senior Tax Analyst. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17364 Filed 8–16–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory 

Committee; Notice of Meeting 

Cancellation 

The Department of Veterans Affairs 

gives notice under the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act that the meeting of the 

Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory 

Committee, previously scheduled to be 

held at the Department of Veterans 

Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., 

Conference Room 630, Washington, DC 

20420, on September 18–19, 2017, has 

been cancelled. 

For more information, please contact 

Alejandra Paulovich, Program Analyst, 

Geriatrics and Extended Care Services at 

(202) 461–6016 or via email at 

Alejandra.Paulovich@va.gov. 

Dated: August 11, 2017. 

Jelessa M. Burney, 

Federal Advisory Committee Management 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17362 Filed 8–16–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. § 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay Higham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of            the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   |   |      |
|--------|--------|-----------|
|        |   | By:  | Jay Higham |
|   |   |      | Jay Higham

Chief Executive Officer

 

November 16, 2009 |
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50602 Conference Calendar

DEREK LEN BOUNDS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ADOLPH THOMAS, officer, Hondo prison; JOSEPH LAUGHLIN, Officer, Hondo prison, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-94-CV-281

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Derek Bounds, #644236, appeals from the judgment rendered following a jury verdict in favor of the defendants in his civil rights complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because he does not raise any issue appropriate to the posture of this case, the issues are deemed abandoned. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). With no appealable issue beforeNo. 95-50602 - 2 - the court, Bounds’ appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. We caution Bounds that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Bounds is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. Bounds’ two motions requesting that he be transferred from the Darrington Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, are DENIED.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
      I, Michael J. Astrue, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TranskaryoticTherapies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transitioninstructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986] c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 10, 2004 /s/ Michael J. Astrue   Michael J. Astrue President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 20, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-11-00621-CV

____________

WHITTEN ENTERPRISES, INC., D/B/A 

ALLYN MEDICAL SERVICES, Appellant

V.

JOYCE DOTY, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 914385

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed May 17, 2011. Appellant filed a timely 

motion for new trial. The notice of appeal was filed on July 19, 2011. To date, our records 

show that no evidence appellant is excused from paying costs has been filed. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 5.

On September 15, 2011, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing fee 

on or before September 30, 2011, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not paid 
2

the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with 

notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Anderson and Christopher.