alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 545 

Making continuing appropriations for Coast Guard pay in the event the 

Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 2015 expires 

and the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2015 

is not enacted. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2015 

Mr. THUNE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making continuing appropriations for Coast Guard pay in 

the event the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 2015 expires and the Department 

of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2015 is 

not enacted. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay Our Coast Guard 

5 Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 545 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR MEMBERS OF 

2 THE COAST GUARD. 

3 There are hereby appropriated for fiscal year 2015, 

4 out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appro5 priated, for any period during which interim or full-year 

6 appropriations for fiscal year 2015 for the Coast Guard 

7 are not in effect— 

8 (1) such sums as are necessary to provide pay 

9 and allowances to members of the Coast Guard (as 

10 described in section 1 of title 14, United States 

11 Code), including the reserve component thereof, who 

12 perform active service or inactive-duty training dur13 ing such period; 

14 (2) such sums as are necessary to provide pay 

15 and allowances to civilian employees of the Coast 

16 Guard; 

17 (3) such sums as are necessary to provide pay 

18 and allowances to contractors of the Coast Guard; 

19 and 

20 (4) such sums as are necessary for— 

21 (A) the payment of a death gratuity under 

22 sections 1475–1477 and 1489 of title 10, 

23 United States Code, with respect to members of 

24 the Coast Guard; 

25 (B) the payment or reimbursement of au26 thorized funeral travel and travel related to the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 545 IS

1 dignified transfer of remains and unit memorial 

2 services under section 481f of title 37, United 

3 States Code, with respect to members of the 

4 Coast Guard; and 

5 (C) the temporary continuation of a basic 

6 allowance of housing for dependents of mem7 bers of the Coast Guard dying on active duty, 

8 as authorized by section 403(l) of title 37, 

9 United States Code. 

10 SEC. 3. TERMINATION. 

11 Appropriations and funds made available and author12 ity granted pursuant to this Act shall be available until 

13 whichever of the following first occurs: 

14 (1) The enactment into law of an appropriation 

15 (including a continuing appropriation) for any pur16 pose for which amounts are made available in sec17 tion 2. 

18 (2) The enactment into law of the applicable 

19 regular or continuing appropriations resolution or 

20 other Act without any appropriation for such pur21 pose. 

22 (3) January 1, 2016. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 610 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 

study of P.S. 103 in West Baltimore, Maryland and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2015 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study of P.S. 103 in West Baltimore, 

Maryland and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Thurgood Marshall’s 

5 Elementary School Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 610 IS

1 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

2 means— 

3 (A) P.S. 103, the public school located in 

4 West Baltimore, Maryland, which Thurgood 

5 Marshall attended as a youth; and 

6 (B) any other resources in the neighbor7 hood surrounding P.S. 103 that relate to the 

8 early life of Thurgood Marshall. 

9 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

10 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a special 

11 resource study of the study area. 

12 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub13 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

14 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

15 study area; 

16 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

17 designating the study area as a unit of the National 

18 Park System; 

19 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

20 protection, and interpretation of the study area by 

21 the Federal Government, State or local government 

22 entities, or private and nonprofit organizations; 

23 (4) consult with interested Federal agencies, 

24 State or local governmental entities, private and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 610 IS

1 nonprofit organizations, or any other interested indi2 viduals; and 

3 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac4 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

5 maintenance associated with the alternatives. 

6 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

7 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec8 tion 100507 of title 54, United States Code. 

9 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

10 on which funds are first made available to carry out the 

11 study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to 

12 the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep13 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

14 Resources of the Senate a report that describes— 

15 (1) the results of the study; and 

16 (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the 

17 Secretary. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15226 and #15227; NEBRASKA Disaster Number NE-00069]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of NEBRASKA (FEMA-4325-DR), dated 08/01/2017.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Straight-line Winds.                     

*Incident Period:*                         06/12/2017 through 06/17/2017.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 08/01/2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/02/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/01/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of NEBRASKA, dated 08/01/2017, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Platte

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-18130 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 21
 WESCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES
 PERCENTAGEOWNED BY
    
    STATE OFNAME OF SUBSIDIARY
    
    REGISTRANT
    
    INCORPORATIONWesco Holdings Midwest, Inc.
    
    100%
    
    NebraskaWesco-Financial Insurance Company
    
    100%
    
    NebraskaKansas Bankers Surety Company
    
    100%
    
    KansasCORT Business Services Corporation
    
    100%
    
    DelawarePrecision Steel Warehouse, Inc.
    
    100%
    
    IllinoisPrecision Steel Warehouse, Inc., Charlotte Service Center
    
    100%
    
    DelawarePrecision Brand Products
    
    100%
    
    DelawareMS Property Company
    
    100%
    
    California
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                         NUKO Information Systems, Inc.

                         Computation of Loss Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Eight Months
                                           Year Ended         Ended           Year Ended
                                          December 31,     December 31,        April 30,
                                              1996             1995              1995
                                              ----             ----              ----
<S>                                      <C>               <C>              <C>
Primary loss per share
----------------------

Net loss............................     ($14,733,030)     ($1,957,645)     ($1,743,862)
                                          ----------------------------------------------
Shares outstanding at beginning
 of year............................        9,128,418        5,541,473        4,749,441
                                          ----------------------------------------------
Weighted average effect of shares
 issued during year.................          580,803          255,255          423,047
                                          ----------------------------------------------
Weighted average effect of shares
 redeemed during year...............                0                0                0
                                          ----------------------------------------------
Weighted average effect of share
 subscriptions (excluded due to
 anti-dilutive effect)..............                0       (3,014,347)      (3,014,347)
                                          ----------------------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding
 for year...........................        9,709,221        2,782,381        2,158,141
                                          ----------------------------------------------
Primary loss per share..............           ($1.52)          ($0.70)          ($0.81)
                                          ----------------------------------------------
Fully diluted loss per share (Note A)
-------------------------------------
</TABLE>

Note A: This computation not made as the result is anti-dilutive due to net
loss for the year.

* Eight month fiscal year
**Exhibit
31.2**
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Don
Waite, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dialysis Corporation of
America;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
annual report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of any annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.
 
 
 /s/
      Don WaiteDON WAITE, Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 29, 2005
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 20
- 00318
- CV

In re Teerachai Supakorndej

FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 18
- 003565, THE HONORABLE J. ANDREW HATHCOCK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Re lator Teerachai Supakorndej petitions for a writ of mandamus to vacate a temporary order requiring him to pay $ 15,00 0 in a ttorne y ’ s fees to counsel for his ex

- wife, real party in interest Shang Xu. 1 Se e Tex. Fam. Code § 109.001 (a)(5)

. Supakorndej b ears the bu r den to present this Court with a record sufficient to demonstrate his right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding)

. Based on this record, we deny relief. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 52.7 (a) ( providi n g that manda mus record must contain, among other things, “ a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator ’ s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding ” and “ properly authenticated ” copies of

“ any exhibits o ffered in ev idence ” ). 2

1 Relator appealed t h e results of t he divorce to this Court in cause N o. 03

- 20

- 0177

- CV

.
2 We d ismiss as moot Xu ’ s “ Motion to Deny Petition for Writ of Mandamus ” an d a lternativ e motion to str ike

.2 __________________________________________ Edward Smith , Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Tria na , and S m ith Filed: January 7, 2021
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 4, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133430 & (96) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

TACCO FALCON POINT, INC., Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff/ 

Stephen J. Markman, Counter-Defendant-Appellee, Justices v SC: 133430 

 COA: 271525 

Oakland CC: 2002-042917-CZ 

DAVID M. CLAPPER, 

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/

Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant/

Cross-Appellee, 

v 

ART MIDWEST, INC.,

Intervening Third-Party

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS, INC., and

AMERICAN REALTY TRUST, INC., 

Third-Party Defendants-Appellees/ 

Cross-Appellants,

and 

ART MIDWEST, L.P., 

Third-Party Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., would remand this case to the trial court for the reasons stated in 

the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion. 

t0528 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 4, 2008 

 Clerk
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 624 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to waive coinsurance under 

Medicare for colorectal cancer screening tests, regardless of whether 

therapeutic intervention is required during the screening. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2015 

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mr. WICKER, Mr. CARDIN, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to waive 

coinsurance under Medicare for colorectal cancer screening tests, regardless of whether therapeutic intervention 

is required during the screening. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Barriers to 

5 Colorectal Cancer Screening Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 624 IS

1 (1) Colorectal cancer is the second leading 

2 cause of cancer death among men and women com3 bined in the United States. 

4 (2) In 2015, more than 130,000 Americans will 

5 be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and approxi6 mately 50,000 Americans will die from it. 

7 (3) Approximately 60 percent of colorectal can8 cer cases and 70 percent of deaths occur in those 

9 aged 65 and older. 

10 (4) Colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy al11 lows for the detection and removal of polyps, or ab12 normal growths, that could become cancerous, as 

13 well as for the early detection of colorectal cancer 

14 when treatment can be most effective. 

15 (5) Although colorectal cancer is largely pre16 ventable, one in three adults between the ages of 50 

17 and 75 are not up to date with recommended 

18 colorectal cancer screening. 

19 (6) Over 200 organizations have committed to 

20 eliminating colorectal cancer as a major public 

21 health problem and are working toward the shared 

22 goal of reaching 80 percent screened for colorectal 

23 cancer by 2018. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 624 IS

1 (7) Colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy is a 

2 highly effective preventive service, and removing fi3 nancial barriers can help to increase screening rates. 

4 SEC. 3. WAIVING MEDICARE COINSURANCE FOR 

5 COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING TESTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1833(a)(1)(Y) of the So7 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(a)(1)(Y)) is amended 

8 by inserting ‘‘, including a colorectal cancer screening test 

9 (regardless of the code that is billed for the establishment 

10 of a diagnosis as a result of the test, or for the removal 

11 of tissue or other procedure that is furnished in connection 

12 with, as a result of, and in the same clinical encounter 

13 as the screening test),’’ after ‘‘section 1861(ddd)(3)’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to items and services furnished 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40153-40154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than September 7, 2017.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Kathryn Haney, Director of 
Applications) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80c1f0f0ece9e3e1f4e9efeef3aec3efedede5eef4f3c0e1f4ecaee6f2e2aeeff2e7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d594a5a5b9bcb6b4a1bcbabba6fb96bab8b8b0bba1a695b4a1b9fbb3a7b7fbbaa7b2">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Wirt Adams Yerger, Jr.; Mary Montague Yerger; Wirt Adams Yerger, 
IV; Wirt Adams Yerger, IV, as custodian for Anny Elizabeth Yerger, Jane 
Ellen Yerger, and Mary Adams Yerger; Mary Montague Yerger Dunbar; Mary 
Montague Yerger Dunbar, trustee for Mary Montague Yerger Dunbar 
Revocable Trust; Mary Montague Yerger Dunbar, as custodian of Mary 
Montague

[[Page 40154]]

Dunbar, all of Jackson, Mississippi; Wirt Adams Yerger, III and Linda 
Biggers Yerger, both of Inlet Beach, Florida; John Taylor Yerger, 
Dallas, Texas; Richard Montague Yerger, Birmingham, Alabama; James 
David Yerger, Raleigh, North Carolina; Thomas Yerger Dunbar and Wirt 
Yerger Dunbar, both of Austin, Texas; Frank Montague Yerger; Frank 
Montague Yerger, trustee for Frank Montague Yerger Revocable Trust; 
Jane P. Yerger; Jane P. Yerger, trustee for Frank Montague Yerger, Jr., 
Trust 2; Jane P. Yerger, trustee for Sara Jane Rivers Yerger Trust; and 
Jane P. Yerger, trustee for Harlan Prater Yerger Trust, all of Oxford, 
Mississippi; to collectively retain voting shares of PriorityOne 
Capital Corporation, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares in 
PriorityOne Bank, both in Magee, Mississippi.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
August 18, 2017.
Yao-Chin Chao, Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-17893 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>