alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for First Suburban National Bank, Maywood, Illinois (“the Receiver”) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of First Suburban National Bank on October 22, 2010. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated August 22, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-18109 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 95 3 . MARY EVANS v . J ULI AN ARNOLD.

Fo l l owi n g a b en ch t ri al , J u l i an Arn o l d o b t ai ned a j udgm e n t a ga in s t M ary Ev an s i n t h e M u n i ci p al Co u rt o f Co l u m b us , M u s co g ee Co u nt y fo r $ 1 ,2 0 0 .0 0 , p l u s co u r t

co s t s o f $ 5 0 .5 0. Ev an s fi l ed a n o t i ce o f ap p eal

. W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Al t h ou g h fi n al ju d g m en t s o f t h e Mu ni ci p al Co u r t o f Co l u m b u s, M u s co gee Co u n t y are d i rect l y ap peal ab le as i f a ju d g m en t fro m a s t at e or su p eri o r co u rt , Ga. L. 1 9 8 3 , p p

. 44 5 3 -4 4 5 4 , § 3 3 (c), ap p eal s of al l a c t i o n s f o r d am ag es i n wh i ch t h e ju d g m en t i s $ 1 0 , 00 0

. 0 0 o r l es s m u s t b e b y ap p l icat i o n fo r d is cret i o n ary ap p eal

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (6 ); s ee al s o Jen n i ng s v. Mo s s , 2 3 5 Ga. Ap p

. 3 5 7 , 3 57 (5 0 9 SE2 d 6 5 5 ) (1 9 98 ). Ev an s’ s fai l u re t o co m p l y wi t h t h e di s cret io n ary ap p eal p ro ced u re d ep ri v es t h i s Co u rt o f j u ri s d i ct i o n t o co n si d er h i s ap p eal

. Acco rd i n g ly , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. January 31, 2018

01/31/2018
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40794

Summary Calendar

__________________

MICHAEL ARTHUR MAGOON,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

C.B. TURNER, Mail Room Supervisor,

Louis C. Powledge Unit; R.L. SIMMONS,

Cpt., Louis C. Powledge Unit; F.E.

FIGUEROA, Warden, Louis C. Powledge Unit;

WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-543

- - - - - - - - - -

February 9, 1996

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Arthur Magoon appeal from the district court's

dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous. He argues

that false disciplinary reports were "vindictively" filed against

him, that as a result, he was transferred to a more violent 

prison and passed over for parole, and that his mail is tampered

with by prison officials.
No. 95-40794

-2-

Magoon does not allege a retaliatory motive, nor does he set

forth any specific facts to support his conclusions that the

filing of the disciplinary reports by defendant Turner was done

"vindictively." See Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1164 (5th Cir.

1995). Further, Magoon concedes that the disciplinary charges

were ultimately dismissed, and his allegations do not establish

that, but for the filing of the disciplinary charges, he would

not have been transferred or denied parole. Finally, Magoon has

not demonstrated that his position as a litigant was prejudiced

by mail tampering. See Walker v. Navarro County Jail, 4 F.3d

410, 413 (5th Cir. 1993). The district court thus did not abuse

its discretion by dismissing Magoon's complaint as frivolous.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of IntegraMed America, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
     John W. Hlywak, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
     pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        1.  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.  The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                                /s/John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                   -----------------------------------
                                   John W. Hlywak, Jr.
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   May 9, 2008
#### Richard E. Chase, Appellant, v Erick Bowen, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 819]

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Wayne County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff attorney appeals from an order directing defendant, his former client, to pay $1,000 to plaintiff to settle a counsel fee dispute. We agree with plaintiff that he is entitled to a trial *1351de novo to establish the quantum meruit value of his services, despite his failure to provide defendant with a letter of engagement or written retainer agreement *(see generally Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea,*41 AD3d 54 [2007]). Based on the evidence in the record before us, we conclude that plaintiff met his “burden of establishing that the terms of the alleged fee arrangement were fair, fully understood, and agreed to by [defendant]” *(id.*at 64). We further conclude, however, that plaintiff is not entitled to reinstatement of an earlier arbitration award inasmuch as defendant timely demanded a trial de novo *(see*22 NYCRR 137.8). We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Supreme Court for a trial de novo to establish the fair and reasonable value of the legal services rendered by plaintiff *(see Seth Rubenstein, P.C.,*41 AD3d at 63-64; *Jones v Wright,*16 Misc 3d 133[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51494[U]). Present—Martoche, J.P., Smith, Peradotto, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                ZERO CORPORATION

                          Subsidiaries of Registrant*
                              As of March 31, 1997


1.   Air Cargo Equipment Corporation, a Delaware corporation
2.   Air Cargo Equipment (UK) Limited, a U.K. corporation
3.   Air Cooling Technology, Inc., a California corporation
4.   Cambridge Aeroflo, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation
5.   Electronic Solutions, a Nevada corporation
6.   McLean Midwest Corporation, a Minnesota corporation
7.   Nielsen Hardware Corporation, a Connecticut corporation
8.   Precision Fabrication Technologies, Inc., an Indiana corporation
9.   Productos Aereos, S.A., a Mexican corporation
10.  Samuel Groves & Co. Limited, a U.K. corporation
11.  ZERO FSC Corporation, a Virgin Islands corporation
12.  ZERO - East Division, ZERO Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation
13.  ZERO Enclosures, Inc., a California corporation
14.  ZERO Integrated Systems, a California corporation
15.  ZERO International, Inc., a California corporation
16.  ZERO Manufacturing Corporation, a California corporation
17.  ZERO McLean Europe LTD., a U.K. corporation
  

* All are 100% owned
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0711 IN THE MATTER OF: B.W., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 22 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 16 2023

08/16/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0711
Exhibit 10.17  FIRST AMENDMENT TO ZENITH NATIONAL INSURANCE CORP. AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE OFFICER BONUS PLAN  Zenith National Insurance
Corp., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby amends the Zenith
National Insurance Corp. 2003 Amended and Restated Executive Officer Bonus Plan
(the Plan), effective December 1, 2008, with reference to the following:  WHEREAS,
the Company maintains the Plan for the benefit of its executive officers; and  WHEREAS,
the Plan was amended and restated on February 12, 2003; and  WHEREAS, Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), places certain
restrictions, among other things, as to the timing of distributions from
nonqualified deferred compensation plans and arrangements; and  WHEREAS, the Board of
Directors of the Company desires to amend the Plan to comply with Section 409A
of the Code; and  WHEREAS, the Compensation
Committee of the Company has previously granted the appropriate officers of the
Company the authority to prepare such amendments as may be necessary in order
to comply with Section 409A of the Code;  NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is
hereby amended by adding the following section it:  3.Section 409A  All
payments made pursuant to this executive officer bonus plan shall be made in no
event later than the later of (i) the 15th day of the third month
following the end of Executive Officers taxable year in which such bonus is
determined in accordance with Section 2 or (ii) the 15th day of the
third month following the end of the Companys taxable year in which such bonus
is determined in accordance with Section 2.  It is intended that this Plan shall comply
with the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the Code) and the Treasury Regulations relating thereto so as not
to subject any Executive Officer to the payment of additional taxes and
interest under Section 409A of the Code. 
In furtherance of this intent, this Plan shall be interpreted, operated,
and administered in a manner consistent with these intentions, and to the
extent that any rules, regulations or other guidance issued under Section 409A
of the Code would result in any Executive Officer being subject to payment of
additional income taxes or interest under Section 409A of the Code, the
Company shall amend this Plan to the extent necessary to avoid the application
of such taxes or interest to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the
Code.  IN WITNESS HEREOF, the
Company has executed this First Amendment to the Plan effective as of the date
written above.  ZENITH NATIONAL INSURANCE
  CORP.By:
  /s/ Michael E. JansenMichael E. JansenExecutive Vice Presidentand General CounselBy:
  /s/Kari L. Van GundyKari L. Van GundySenior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                           |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |   | By:                       |  /s/ Timothy P. Sheehan |
|   |   |       |       Timothy P. Sheehan      Vice President Finance and       Interim Chief Financial Officer        May 6, 2011 |
#### Local No. 4, International Association of Heat and Frost and Asbestos Workers, et al., Respondents, v Buffalo Wholesale Supply Co., Inc., Doing Business as Niagara Insulation, et al., Defendants, and Canfield Funding, LLC, Doing Business as Millennium Funding, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

*1279[852 NYS2d 886]

Same memorandum as in *Local No. 4, Intl. Assn. of Heat & Frost & Asbestos Workers v Buffalo Wholesale Supply Co., Inc.*(49 AD3d 1276 [2008]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Green and Gorski, JJ.
**Exhibit 21**

 

**List of Principal Subsidiaries of Inamed Corp.**

 
| **Subsidiary**                           | ** ** | **Country**     | ** ** | **State**  |
|------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------|------------|------------|
|                                     |       |            |       |       |
| AEI, Inc.                                |       | US              |       | Delaware   |
| Bioenterics Corporation                  |       | US              |       | California |
| Collagen KK                              |       | Japan           |       |       |
| Collagen Aesthetics (UK)  Limited        |       | UK              |       |       |
| Collagen Aesthetics Australia  Pty. Ltd. |       | Australia       |       |       |
| Collagen Aesthetics GmbH                 |       | Germany         |       |       |
| Collagen Aesthetics Iberia  SA           |       | Spain           |       |       |
| Collagen Aesthetics SRL                  |       | Italy           |       |       |
| Inamed Aesthetics GmbH                   |       | Germany         |       |       |
| Inamed Aesthetics Limited                |       | UK              |       |       |
| Inamed Aesthetics SA                     |       | Spain           |       |       |
| Inamed Canada Inc.                       |       | Canada          |       |       |
| Inamed International Corp.               |       | US              |       | Delaware   |
| Inamed Medical Products  Corp.           |       | US              |       | California |
| Inamed SRL                               |       | Italy           |       |       |
| McGhan Limited                           |       | Ireland         |       |       |
| McGhan Medical BV                        |       | The Netherlands |       |       |
| McGhan Medical SARL                      |       | France          |       |       |
| McGhan Médico SA                    |       | Costa Rica      |       |       |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Frontier Oil Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A
for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Julie H.
Edwards, Executive Vice Prsident - Finance & Administration, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Julie H. Edwards
Julie H. Edwards
Executive Vice President - Finance & Administration,
Chief Financial Officer

October 31, 2003
Exhibit 32

Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

                        GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Form 10-QSB of Global  Entertainment
Corporation  (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2004, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Quarterly Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company each hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
          13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Dated January 14, 2005


/s/ Richard Kozuback
----------------------------
Richard Kozbuack
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ J. Craig Johnson
----------------------------
J. Craig Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ARTHUR ALAN WOLK, PHILIP BROWNDIES, AND CATHERINE MARCHAND,

Respondents

v.

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LOWER MERION,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 481 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17 th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the

remaining issue. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Where a Court of Common Pleas grants a petition by issuing an immediately effective injunction, is that order immediately appealable of right under Pa.R.A.P. 311(a)(4)?

(2) Is an order of the Court of Common Pleas that enjoined a school

district from collecti ng a portion of its 2016 taxes a “final order” as to which [Petitioner] must file post

- trial motions before taking an appeal, even though other and different claims in the case remain

unaddressed?

(3) May a Court of Common Pleas convert a preliminary injunction hearing into a permanent injunction hearing without the consent of the parties?[ 481 MAL 2 017 ]

- 2

The Applications for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae are GRANTED

.

Justice Todd did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
#### Richard K. GARTMAN, Claimant-Appellant, v. Gordon H. MANSFIELD, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2007-7234.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 11, 2007.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Richard K. Gartman’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss his appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.