alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jackson E. Reasor, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 14, 2003



/s/ JACKSON E. REASORJackson E. Reasor President and Chief Executive Officer




24
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          25,596
<SECURITIES>                                    12,854
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,713
<INVENTORY>                                     11,237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,598
<PP&E>                                          25,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,936
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,608
<OTHER-SE>                                          60
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,668
<SALES>                                         31,064<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,064
<CGS>                                           18,061<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,061
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    31
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,421
<INCOME-TAX>                                       569
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                852
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES REVENUES FROM LICENSING OF SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES.
<F2>INCLUDES COSTS FROM LICENSING OF SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:       April 29, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Jeffrey      Hall                                |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   | Jeffrey      Hall                                         |   |
|                            |   | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                            |   | Express      Scripts, Inc.                                |   |
Exhibit 99.1











March 27, 2002



U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:

In a letter dated March 27, 2002, our independent public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen"), represented to us that their audit of the financial statements of Wisconsin Gas Company as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended was subject to Andersen's quality control system for their U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that their engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation, and that availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen was not relevant to the audit.



Very truly yours,



/s/STEPHEN. P. DICKSONStephen P. Dickson -- Controller
and Principal Accounting Officer



SJB
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael A. WATSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-31094.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 23, 2008.

Robert William Piedrahita, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Middle District of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Karl J. Koch, McGlynn, Glisson & Koch, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

The guilty-plea conviction of Defendant-Appellant Michael A. Watson for use of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A), was based on his trade of drugs to an undercover agent in exchange for a handgun. When he pleaded guilty, Watson reserved the right to challenge on appeal the sufficiency of the factual basis to support his conviction under the statute.

*613We followed our precedent in rejecting Watson’s insistence that an act like his— obtaining a firearm in exchange for drugs—is distinguishable from our precedent sustaining convictions when the defendant receives drugs or other consideration in exchange for a firearm that he possessed and gives up in the exchange transaction.

The Supreme Court of the United States granted *certiorari,*and *sub nom Watson v. United States,*— U.S. --, 128 S.Ct. 579, 169 L.Ed.2d 472 (2007), reversed our affirmance of Watson’s conviction.1 The court held that a person does not “use” a firearm within the intendment of the statute when he receives it in exchange for drugs and remanded Watson’s case to us for additional consistent proceedings.

Accordingly, we withdraw our previous opinion affirming Watson’s conviction, reverse his conviction for use of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, vacate the sentence imposed for that conviction, and remand this case to the district court for further disposition consistent with our ruling today, recognizing that a person does not “use” a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) when he receives it in exchange for drugs.

PRIOR OPINION AND JUDGMENT WITHDRAWN; CONVICTION FOR VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) REVERSED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED TO THE DISTRICT COURT FOR FURTHER DISPOSITION CONSISTENT HEREWITH.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. *Michael A. Watson v. United States,*06-571, Dec. 10, 2007.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at July 31, 1999 and the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                                          230,900
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 2,059,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    (20,800)
<INVENTORY>                                                  34,061,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             42,482,000
<PP&E>                                                       51,828,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (18,640,500)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               77,775,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         8,400,600
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                     48,451,600
<OTHER-SE>                                                    2,777,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 77,775,800
<SALES>                                                      92,402,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             92,402,300
<CGS>                                                        59,795,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                59,795,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             34,300,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              534,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (2,227,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (762,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (1,465,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (1,465,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (0.05)


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert Copple, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cinemark USA,
Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the
registrant and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 5, 2004CINEMARK USA, INC.By:
    
    /s/Robert
CoppleRobert CoppleChief Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-4072

_____________________________

DAMON J. FOREHAND, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Coleman Lee Robinson, Judge.

March 1, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Damon J. Forehand, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
hemsinov14.htm


    

    
      

    

     

     

    
      AMENDMENT
TO CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT

       

      Between

       

      Alliance
International Reinsurance Company Limited of Lophitis Business Centre, 28th
October Street, CY-3035 Limassol, Cyprus (hereinafter called “the Employer” or
the Company” of the one part

      and

      Khader
Hemsi of Villa 42. Sporadon Street 6, Armenochori, Ayios Tychonas, CY-4521
Limassol, Cyprus (hereinafter called “the Chief Executive Officer” or “Khader
Hemsi”) of the other part

       

      WHEREAS:-

       

      
        	
                A.

              	
                The
      parties hereto have entered into a contract of employment dated 30 June
      2005 (hereinafter called “the Contract of
  Employment”).

              


      

       

      
        	
                B.

              	
                The
      parties hereto are desirous of amending the Contract of Employment in the
      manner herein below stated.

              


      

       

      NOW THIS
AMENDEMENT TO THE CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT WITNESSETH as follows:-

       

      
        	
                (1)

              	
                The
      duration of the Contract is amended and extended to expire on 30th
      June 2012 and

                 

              


      

       

      
        	
                (2)

              	
                That
      all the other terms of the original contract are to be and remain the
      same

              


      

       

      IN
WITNESS whereof we have hereunto set our respective hands this 14th day of
November 2007.

       

       

       

       

      
        
          
            	
                    /s/
      Marios
      Eliades                 
      /s/ Michaelis Polydorides

                  	
                    /s/
      Khader Hemsi

                  
	
                    Marios
      Eliades and Michaelis Polydorides

                    By
      order of the Board

                    For
      and on behalf of the Company

                  	
                    Khader
      Hemsi

                    Chief
      Executive Officer

                  
	
                     
      

                     

                  	 
      
	
                    /s/
      Jacqueline Sabbogh

                  	
                    /s/
      Manolis Madjimanolis

                  
	
                    Witness

                  	
                    Witness
No. 1299.

#### Longtin *v.*Nierstheimer, Warden.

June 10, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Kankakee County, Illinois, denied.
No. 967.

#### Autocar Sales & Service Co. *v.*Leonard et al., Trustees.

May 20, 1946.

327 U. S. 804.
Exhibit 10.12


 


BIOSANTE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


 


DESCRIPTION
OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR


COMPENSATION
ARRANGEMENTS


 


Retainer and Meeting Fees.   We pay our non-employee
directors annual retainers and meeting fees. 
We pay each of our non-employee directors an annual cash retainer of
$18,000, paid on a quarterly basis. In addition, we pay our Chairman of the
Board an additional $22,500 in annual cash compensation, the Chair of our Audit
and Finance Committee an additional $9,000 in annual cash compensation, the Chair
of our Compensation Committee an additional $4,500 in annual cash compensation
and the Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee an
additional $4,500 in annual cash compensation. These additional payments also
are paid on a quarterly basis.


 


With
respect to meeting fees, we pay each of our non-employee directors $1,800 for
each Board meeting attended in person, $900 for each Board committee meeting
attended in person and $900 for each Board and Board committee meeting attended
via telephone.


 


On
March 13, 2009, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of both the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee, unanimously
approved the reduction of the cash retainers and meeting fees by 10%. The
revised amounts of the cash retainers and meeting fees are reflected above.


 


We
do not compensate Stephen M. Simes, our Vice Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, separately for serving on our Board of Directors or any of
the Board committees.


 


Stock Options.  We typically grant our
non-employee directors stock options from time to time.  Most recently, on February 2, 2009, we
granted each non-employee director an option to purchase 50,000 shares of our
common stock.  Each such option has an
exercise price of $1.51 per share, which represented the closing sale price of
a share of our common stock on the date of grant, a term of 10 years and will
vest in full on February 2, 2010.


 


Reimbursement of Expenses.  We
reimburse each member of our Board of Directors, including Mr. Simes, for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and Board
committee meetings.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 381 

To improve the response to missing children and victims of child sex 

trafficking. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To improve the response to missing children and victims 

of child sex trafficking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bringing Missing Chil5 dren Home Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESPONSE TO MISSING CHILDREN AND VICTIMS OF 

7 CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING. 

8 (a) MISSING CHILDREN’S ASSISTANCE ACT.—Section 

9 404(b)(1)(P)(iii) of the Missing Children’s Assistance Act 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 381 IS

1 (42 U.S.C. 5773(b)(1)(P)(iii)) is amended by striking 

2 ‘‘child prostitution’’ and inserting ‘‘child sex trafficking’’. 

3 (b) CRIME CONTROL ACT OF 1990.—Section 3702 

4 of the Crime Control Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 5780) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) in paragraph (3)— 

9 (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) 

10 and (C) as subparagraphs (C) and (D), respec11 tively; and 

12 (B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) 

13 the following: 

14 ‘‘(B) a recent photograph of the child, if 

15 available;’’; and 

16 (3) in paragraph (4)— 

17 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘60 

18 days’’ and inserting ‘‘30 days’’; 

19 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

20 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

21 (C) in subparagraph (C)— 

22 (i) by inserting ‘‘State and local child 

23 welfare systems and’’ before ‘‘the National 

24 Center for Missing and Exploited Chil25 dren’’; and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 381 IS

1 (ii) by striking the period at the end 

2 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (D) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(D) grant permission to the National 

5 Crime Information Center Terminal Contractor 

6 for the State to update the missing person 

7 record in the National Crime Information Cen8 ter computer networks with additional informa9 tion learned during the investigation relating to 

10 the missing person.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS