alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

In the Interest of A. S. M. , a Child

,

Appellant

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 212

- C V

Appeal from the

65 th District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 200CM737 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the b rief until January 24

, 20 20

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELLANT ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. James D. Lucas, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or b efore January 24, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 23 rd day of December

, 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox , JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          47,223
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  242,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,774)
<INVENTORY>                                     91,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               428,766
<PP&E>                                       2,573,111
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,082,451)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,420,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,851,909
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,761
<COMMON>                                        40,018
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,420,744
<SALES>                                        906,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               906,402
<CGS>                                          784,235
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,038,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,192,776)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,192,776)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,192,776)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENTOF INDPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-04905 and form S-8No. 333-106426) pertaining to the National Technical Systems, Inc.1994 Stock Option Plan and the National Technical Systems, Inc. 2002 StockOption Plan, and in the related Prospectuses, of our report dated April 15,2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofNational Technical Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended January 31, 2005.
|                             | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Woodland Hills,  California |
| April 29, 2005         |

 

----
Base Salaries for Fiscal Year 2008 for Named Executive Officers.



 Exhibit 10.39 
 2008 Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers 
 The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) annually sets forth compensation levels and equity awards for the Company’s executive officers using the following process: after reviewing the data set forth in a
compensation survey provided by Radford Surveys + Consulting, a global life sciences and technology industry compensation consulting firm, the Committee determines on an annual basis for each executive officer, (1) a target total compensation
package, (2) the appropriate allocation of the total compensation package between base salary, short-term performance based compensation and long-term equity incentive compensation, and (3) whether there should be any changes to the
compensation packages to better align our executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders. Adjustments to the base salary of our executive officers is determined by the Committee in February of each year, with the adjustments
becoming effective March 1st. For 2008, the Committee approved the salaries listed below for each of the Company’s named executive
officers. 
  

				
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	Base Salary
for 2008
	 Claes Glassell
President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	490,000
	 William J. Dawson
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	293,273
	 Laurence M. Corash, M.D.
Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer
	  	$	375,000
	 William M. Greenman
Senior Vice President, Business Development and Marketing
	  	$	312,000
	 Howard G. Ervin
Vice President, Legal Affairs
	  	$	311,531
BRYAN RONK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2982

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 1, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Dawn Caloca-Johnson, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Jennifer S. Morrissey, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3501 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to submit to Congress 

a report on promoting broadband Internet access service for veterans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2016 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to submit to Congress a report on promoting broadband Internet access service for veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Broadband 

5 Access for Veterans Act of 2016’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3501 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON PROMOTING BROADBAND INTERNET 

2 ACCESS SERVICE FOR VETERANS. 

3 (a) VETERAN DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

4 ‘‘veteran’’ has the meaning given the term in section 101 

5 of title 38, United States Code. 

6 (b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 1 year after 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Commu8 nications Commission shall submit to Congress a report 

9 on promoting broadband Internet access service for vet10 erans, in particular low-income veterans and veterans re11 siding in rural areas. In such report, the Commission 

12 shall— 

13 (1) examine such access and how to promote 

14 such access; and 

15 (2) provide findings and recommendations for 

16 Congress with respect to such access and how to 

17 promote such access. 

18 (c) PUBLIC NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO COM19 MENT.—In preparing the report required by subsection 

20 (b), the Commission shall provide the public with notice 

21 and an opportunity to comment on broadband Internet ac22 cess service for veterans, in particular low-income veterans 

23 and veterans residing in rural areas, and how to promote 

24 such access. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the "Company") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies that:

                  (i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Dated as of this 9th day of May 2006.


                                         /s/ Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                         Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7831** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DRAKO O SULLIVAN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville
. Henry M. Herlong, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 6:01

- cr - 00898

- HMH

- 1; 6:13

- cv - 02656

- HMH )

Submitted : March 25, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Drako Olandis Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Burke Moorman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Drako O. Sullivan seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his self

- styled “Motion to Correct Criminal Judgment” as an unauthorized, successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. The order is not appe alable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2 ) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDani el , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

– El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

– 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

– 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sullivan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability an d dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1






                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                               GLASSMASTER COMPANY
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     For the two years ended August 31, 1997
                    (Thousands except for per share figures)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  1997      1996
                                                                 ------    ------
<S>                                                              <C>       <C>  
Primary:
  Average Shares Outstanding                                      1,618     1,616
  Net effect of dilutive stock options under treasury
    stock method using average market price                           0         0
                                                                 ------    ------

      Total Average Shares Outstanding                            1,618     1,616

  Net Income                                                     $  235    $  131
                                                                 ======    ======


  Primary Earnings Per Share                                     $  .14    $  .08


Fully Diluted:
  Average Shares Outstanding                                      1,618     1,616
  Net effect of dilutive stock options under treasury stock
    method using year end market value if higher than average         0         0
                                                                 ------    ------

      Total Average Shares Outstanding                            1,618     1,616


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share                                 $  .14    $  .08
</TABLE>



Note:    If average market price is higher than ending market price, primary and
         fully diluted EPS is the same.
<PAGE>   1





                                   EXHIBIT 23




                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports dated February 26, 1997 (except with respect to the matter
discussed in Note Two, as to which the date is April 2, 1997), included in this
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, into (i) the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 33-15643,
33-11295 and 333-19587 (ii) the Prospectus constituting part of the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-56889).




/s/  Arthur Andersen LLP
----------------------------
Arthur Andersen LLP

Chicago, Illinois
April 14, 1997



                                     109
---

EXHIBIT 21.1
 
 NATIONAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
 
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
 NTS TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, A CALIFORNIA CORP.
 
 ACTON ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING CORPORATION, A MASSACHUSETTS CORP.
 
 APPROVED ENGINEERING TESTING LABORATORIES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP.
 
 ETCR INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP.
 
 NTS ENGINEERING SERVICES INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP.
 
 NATIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE, INC., A MASSACHUSETTS CORP. (50% OWNED)
 
 NTS EUROPE, GmbH
 
 AETL TESTING, INC. dba NTS CALGARY
 
 PHASE SEVEN LABORATORIES, A CALIFORNIA CORP.
 
 UNITED STATES TEST LABORATORY, LLC.
 
 ELLIOTT LABORATORIES, LLC
 
 UNITEK TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
 
 MECHTRONIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
Exhibit 32.1

OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jackson E. Reasor, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

Date: November 11, 2008



/s/ JACKSON E. REASORJackson E. ReasorPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal executive officer)
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

SI Investments Corp., Sarbjit Kaur and 

Iqbal Kaur, Appellants

No. 06-18-00044-CV v.

RN Sweet I, LLC, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2017-

1980-CCL2). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the joint motion of the parties to 

dismiss the appeal by agreement should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellants, SI Investments Corp., Sarbjit Kaur and Iqbal Kaur, 

pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 17, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Case No. DA 19-0629

ALFRED DESCHAMPS, BAR II ENTERPRISES, L.L.C.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

FARWEST ROCK, LTD, FARWEST ROCK PRODUCTS, FARWEST 

PRODUCTS, LLC, LUNDE BASTON, MIKE BASTON, and DOES 1-10

Defendants and Appellees.

ORDER GRANTING APPELLEES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER BRIEF

On Appeal from the Montana Fourth Judicial District Court

County of Missoula, Cause No. DV-18-1647

Honorable Elizabeth A. Best, Presiding

Pursuant to Appellees’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Answer Brief, with good cause appearing therefore and no objection by 

Appellants,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellees’ Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time to File Answer Brief is GRANTED, and Appellees shall have

up to and including July 30, 2020 to file their opening brief.

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW.

Electronically signed by:

James Jeremiah Shea

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 22 2020

05/22/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0629
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Daniel Herrera and Imelda Herrera, and/or 

All Occupants of 316 Alamo Road, 

Lockhart, Texas 78644, Appellants

No. 06-15-00081-CV v.

Bank of America, N.A., Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Caldwell County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 5965). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellants pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 7, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 23








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration StatementNos. 333-151119 on Form S-3, and
333-127889-01, 333-71990-01 and 333-63101-01 on Form S-8 of our reports dated
February25, 2009, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement scheduleof Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
and subsidiary, and the effectiveness of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation’s
internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation for the year ended December
31, 2008.








/s/ Deloitte & Touche
LLP








Milwaukee, Wisconsin


February 25, 2009
**STATSURE        DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.**

**March        31, 2006**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. for                the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and                Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A                of                StatSure Diagnostic Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,                2006                fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and                results of operations of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        |                                                                                                                                           |                             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                                                                                | /s/                  Leo Ehrlich |
|   | Leo                  Ehrlich                                                                                                                   |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer (principal                    financial officer and                    duly authorized officer)  |

----
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 459 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to approve waivers 

under the Medicaid Program under title XIX of the Social Security 

Act that are related to State provider taxes that exempt certain retirement communities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2015 

Mr. BOOZMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

to approve waivers under the Medicaid Program under 

title XIX of the Social Security Act that are related 

to State provider taxes that exempt certain retirement 

communities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Provider Tax Adminis5 trative Simplification Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 459 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROVIDER TAX RULE EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN 

2 CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMU3 NITIES. 

4 In the case of a State that has a provider tax that 

5 does not apply to continuing care retirement communities 

6 or life care communities (as such terms are used for pur7 poses of section 1917(g) of the Social Security Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 1396p(g))) that have no beds that are certified to 

9 provide medical assistance (as such term is defined under 

10 section 1905(a) of such Act) under title XIX of the Social 

11 Security Act or that do not provide services for which pay12 ment may be made under title XIX of the Social Security 

13 Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 

14 approve a waiver under section 433.68(e)(2)(iii) of title 

15 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations regardless of 

16 whether the Secretary determines that the State satisfies 

17 the requirements of section 433.68(e)(2)(iii)(B) of such 

18 title. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS