alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 282 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 18, 2003.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 1528) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to protect taxpayers and 
ensure accountability of the Internal Revenue Service. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The amendment recommended by the Committee on 
Ways and Means now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in 
part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, 
shall be considered as adopted. All points of order against the bill, as 
amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) the further amendment printed in part B of 
the report of the Committee on Rules, if offered by Representative Rangel of New 
York or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point 
of order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements

</LEGEND>

                                 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-26-1997
<CASH>                                         951,668
<SECURITIES>                                   160,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    925,463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,951,895
<PP&E>                                         18,200,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,676,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,945,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,774,054
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       44,883
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,126,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,945,069
<SALES>                                        17,298,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,298,626
<CGS>                                          5,656,124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,857,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (88,408)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             47,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                174,749
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            174,749
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,165,135)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (572,883)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,912,767)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian M. Stone, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 794]

*1315It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and on the law by amending the order of protection and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a bench trial of, inter alia, rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [3]), defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. We reject that contention *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). County Court’s determination to credit the testimony of the victim is entitled to deference, and we see no reason to disturb that determination *(see People v Harris,*15 AD3d 966 [2005], *lv denied*4 NY3d 831 [2005]).

We *agree*with defendant, however, that the court erred in determining the duration of the order of protection without taking into account the jail-time credit to which he is entitled *(see People v Fomby,*42 AD3d 894, 896 [2007]). Although defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review *(see People v Nieves,*2 NY3d 310, 315-317 [2004]), we nevertheless exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). We therefore modify the judgment by amending the order of protection, and we remit the matter to County Court to determine the jail time credit to which defendant is entitled, and to specify in the order of protection an expiration date in accordance with CPL 530.13 (former [4]), the version of the statute in effect when the judgment was rendered on June 23, 2006. Present—Martoche, J.P., Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Green, JJ.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

y1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143479

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143479 COA: 300197 Wayne CC: 06-002740-01 STEVEN CURTIS LONG, 06-002741-01 Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 24, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 22, 2015

NO. 03

- 15

- 00119

- CV

Patrick Quigley, Appellant

v.

Jeffrey Langle, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICE S GOODWIN AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on February 13, 2015 . Having

rev iewed the record , the Court holds that Patrick Quigley has not prosecuted his appeal and did

not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal

for want of prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relat ing to this appeal, both in this

Court and in the court below.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranskaryoticTherapies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned, Gregory D. Perry, Vice President, Finance, and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)  the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |   /s/ Gregory D. Perry |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Dated:                                                             November 14,  2003 | Gregory D. Perry                 |
| Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |                                  |  |

 

1

----
#### FROST et al. v. BANKERS COMMERCIAL CORP.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Jan. 16, 1951.

Alfred S. Julien, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Robert I. Rogin, New York City, for defendant.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

It is unnecessary to pass on the sufficiency of the amended complaint for, even assuming it to state a cause of action, the defendant is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the action. The judgment of the Supreme Court, affirmed by the Appellate Division, in the first action brought by the Republic Chemical Corporation v. Bankers Commercial Corp., 73 N.Y.S.2d 318, affirmed 269 App.Div. 736, 54 N.Y.S.2d 396, determined the claim here in suit adversely to the plaintiff’s contentions. The bills of lading, out of which the claim asserted in this action arises, were then stated to be owned by Republic. The plaintiffs offer no factual proof of when or how these bills of lading or the claim springing from them were acquired by them. Neither the plaintiffs nor Republic submits an affidavit and though the plaintiffs’ attorney here was also the attorney for Republic in the State Court action, his affidavit is also silent on the vital question how the bills of lading owned by Republic at that time have since come into the hands of the plaintiff.

Although a prior motion was made in April 1949, and the present motion papers were served on September 29th, 1950, thus affording more than ample opportunity for submission of affidavits based on facts and personal knowledge, to date none has been submitted. The affidavit of the attorney offered in opposition to the motion is not made on personal knowledge and is insufficient under Rule 56(e) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Person v. U. S., 8 Cir., 112 F.2d 1, certiorari denied, 311 U. S. 672, 61 S.Ct. 35, 85 L.Ed. 432.

In the absence of proof—and the plaintiffs offer none—the Court must on the present record infer that the plaintiffs acquired the bills of lading after the adverse State Court adjudication. If so, they are concluded by it. Nor can the plaintiffs escape the effect of the adverse determination by clothing the claim in different garb. Its *196essential nature, despite the new grounds and theories advanced to support it, remains unchanged. The wholesome principle of. res judicata is not to be overcome so easily.

The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is accordingly granted.

Settle order on notice.
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17816]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10417--American Eagle Savings Bank, Boothwyn, 
Pennsylvania

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for American Eagle Savings Bank, 
Boothwyn, Pennsylvania (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its 
receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of 
American Eagle Savings Bank on January 20, 2012. The liquidation of the 
receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by 
available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making 
a final dividend payment to proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: August 18, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17816 Filed 8-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
```
[919 NYS2d 265]

#### Clermont York Assoc., Respondent, v Leslie Feher, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 15, 2011

*11APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Leslie Feher,*appellant pro se. *Horing, Welikson & Rosen, Williston Park (.Leonard R. Kaplain*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Appeal from order, dated May 22, 2009, deemed an appeal from the ensuing final judgment (same court), entered on or about May 22, 2009, and so considered, final judgment affirmed, without costs. Order (same court), dated August 18, 2009, modified to vacate the award of use and occupancy, award use and occupancy to landlord in the amount of the rent reserved in tenant’s most recent lease, plus any applicable rent guidelines increases through June 30, 2009, and remand the matter for calculation of the use and occupancy award and entry of an amended judgment, and, as modified, order affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order (same court), dated October 29, 2009, dismissed, without costs, as academic with respect to renewal and as taken from a nonappealable order with respect to reargument.

We sustain the conditional judgment of possession awarded in favor of landlord on the holdover petition. A fair interpretation of the evidence, including the parties’ correspondence and the credited testimony of landlord’s witnesses, supports the trial court’s finding that tenant violated paragraph 17 of her lease by obstructing the landlord’s repair efforts in unreasonably denying access to the stabilized apartment premises. Tenant’s jurisdictional points, as well as her claims of error relating to the conduct of the trial and the dismissal of her counterclaims, are lacking in merit.

Tenant correctly argues, however, that landlord was not entitled to a recovery of fair market use and occupancy, since the lease violation established at trial, subject to tenant’s right to cure pursuant to RPAPL 753 (4), did not remove the unit from the ambit of rent stabilization *(see 6 Greene St. Assoc. v Robbins,*256 AD2d 169 [1998]; *Ansonia Assoc. v Bozza,*186 Misc 2d 845 [2000]). That tenant ultimately eschewed the opportunity to cure, and instead chose to vacate the apartment— *12“voluntarily,” as landlord acknowledges — did not serve to alter her status as “a lawful tenant of a rent-stabilized apartment” during the holdover period *(see and compare Weiden v 926 Park Ave. Corp.,*154 AD2d 308, 308 [1989]). In this posture, the award of use and occupancy is more properly limited to the regulated rent plus any applicable guidelines increases.

Shulman, J.E, and Hunter, Jr., J., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.B








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2008, of Colorado Interstate Gas Company (the “Company”)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, John R. Sult, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Controller, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
     /s/ John R.
      SultJohn R.
      SultSenior Vice
      President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)Colorado
      Interstate Gas CompanyMarch 2,
      2009
          A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Colorado
Interstate Gas Company and will be retained by Colorado Interstate Gas Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             114
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   114
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            29411
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        30,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1303)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       114
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12771)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12771)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0






</TABLE>
H. Res. 171

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 17, 2003.

Whereas on Sunday, March 23, 2003, the two-time defending

NCAA National Collegiate Women’s Ice Hockey champion, the University of Minnesota Duluth Bulldogs, won

the National Championship for the third straight year;

Whereas Minnesota Duluth defeated Harvard University in

double overtime of the championship game by the score

of 4–3, having defeated Dartmouth College 5–2 in the

semifinal;

Whereas sophomore Nora Tallus scored the game-winning

goal in the second overtime, assisted by Erika Holst and

Joanne Eustace;

Whereas during the 2002–2003 season, the Bulldogs won an

impressive 31 games, while losing only 3 and tying 2;

Whereas forwards Jenny Potter, Hanne Sikio, and Caroline

Ouellette were selected to the 2003 All-Tournament team

and Caroline Ouellette was named the tournament’s Most

Outstanding Player;

Whereas the Bulldogs are the only team in the country to

earn a berth in the women’s national championship tournament in each year of its existence;

Whereas junior forward Jenny Potter was one of three finalists for the Patty Kazmaier Memorial Award, given annu-
2

•HRES 171 EH

ally to the most outstanding player in women’s collegiate

varsity ice hockey and was named to the Jofa Women’s

University Division Ice Hockey All-American First Team;

Whereas senior forward Maria Rooth, for the fourth time,

was one of ten finalists for the Patty Kazmaier Memorial

Award, and was named to the Jofa Women’s University

Division Ice Hockey All-American Second Team;

Whereas Minnesota Duluth Head Coach Shannon Miller,

after winning the National Championship in three consecutive years, has been named a finalist for the American Hockey Coaches Association 2002–2003 University

Division Women’s Ice Hockey Coach of the Year Award;

and

Whereas all of the team’s players showed tremendous dedication throughout the season toward the goal of winning

the National Championship: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) commends the University of Minnesota Du3 luth women’s hockey team for winning the NCAA

4 2003 National Collegiate Women’s Ice Hockey

5 Championship;

6 (2) recognizes the achievements of all the

7 team’s players, coaches, and support staff and in8 vites them to the United States Capitol Building to

9 be honored;

10 (3) requests that the President recognize the

11 achievements of the University of Minnesota Duluth

12 women’s hockey team and invite them to the White
3

•HRES 171 EH

1 House for an appropriate ceremony honoring a na2 tional championship team; and

3 (4) directs the Clerk of the House of Represent4 atives to make available enrolled copies of this reso5 lution to the University of Minnesota Duluth for ap6 propriate display and to transmit an enrolled copy of

7 this resolution to each coach and member of the

8 NCAA 2003 National Collegiate Women’s Ice Hock9 ey Championship team.

Attest:

Clerk.