alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, December 08, 2015

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 15

- 00837

- CR

____________

RONNEY EARL WILLIA MS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Tex as

Trial Court Cause No. 1476283



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 13, 2015

. See Tex. R.

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the

record. The record has not been filed with the court. B ecause the reporter’s record

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Arlene Webb , the official court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.PER CURIAM
Nicor Gas Company
                                                      Form 10-K
                                                      Exhibit 23.01




                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference of our report,  dated  January 22,  2001,  included in this Form 10-K,
into  the  company's  previously  filed  Form  S-3  Registration   Statement  in
connection  with the Nicor Gas Company  $225,000,000  First  Mortgage Bond shelf
filing (No. 333-69135).





ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 7, 2001
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM

 

 

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on FormN-1A of our report dated November 12, 2013, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of American Funds MoneyMarket Fund, which appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Financialhighlights", "Independent registered public accounting firm", and "Prospectuses, reports to shareholders andproxy statements" in such Registration Statement.

 

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, California

August 27, 2014
July 9, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOSEPH VINCENT SZADA, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00957-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Havemeyer *v.*Bonnell and others.

*(Circuit Court, D. New Jersey.*

July 31, 1884.)

Patent—Bottoms of Cuspidors—Dismissal of Bill.

Law announced in decision in case of *Havemeyer*v. *Randall, ante,*404, applied to tilia case.

In Equity.

Nixon, J.

For the reasons assigned in the case of *The Same Complainant*v. *Randall, ante,*404, in which the same questions are involved, the above bill of complaint must be dismissed, with costs; and it is ordered accordingly.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03- 10 -00 691 -CV
In re Johnn y Ray Valchar
ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Relator filed a petition for writ of m andamus, complaining that the trial cour t had not satisfied its statutory

duties under a

rticle 11.07 of t he code of criminal procedure with reg ard to a n application of writ of habea s corpus he filed on or about September 8, 2010. The trial court has since informed this Court that it ha s issued an orde r with finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law a nd has order ed the a

pplication and re lated docume nts to be forwa rded to the c ourt of cr iminal appeals. A c op y of the tr ia l court ’s or de r ha s bee n sent to Va lc ha r. Th e re fo re , th e tr ia l c ourt ha s c omp lie d w ith the statut e and

Va lc ha r h a s r e c e ive d th e re lie f h e so ug ht thr ou g h his pe tit ion fo r wr it of mandma us . Acc ording ly , we de ny

the petition for wr it of mandamus.

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and Pember

ton Filed: Oc tober 26, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at May 3, 1997 and the Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the thirteen weeks ended May 3, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                      19,107,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,350,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                   284,000
<INVENTORY>                                 33,100,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            59,660,000
<PP&E>                                      47,041,500
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,506,200)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,886,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,634,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    38,269,100
<OTHER-SE>                                (22,855,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,886,300
<SALES>                                     43,928,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,928,900
<CGS>                                       27,997,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,997,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,062,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                212,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            158,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   158,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 22.1
                                                                    ------------

                             WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC.

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                           --------------------------



    The Registrant (Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.) has no parents.

    The following list includes all of the  subsidiaries of the Registrant as of
June 27, 2001 except fourteen wholly-owned inactive domestic subsidiaries of the
Registrant and/or its subsidiaries.

    All of the  subsidiaries  listed  below  are  included  in the  Consolidated
Financial  Statements.  The Consolidated  Financial  Statements also include the
fourteen presently inactive domestic subsidiaries mentioned above.

    Each of the following  subsidiaries  is owned by the Registrant  except that
two subsidiaries,  the names of which are indented,  are owned by the subsidiary
named  immediately  above each  indentation.  All  subsidiaries are wholly-owned
except for Bahamas Supermarkets Limited, which is owned approximately 78% by W-D
(Bahamas) Limited.

                 Subsidiary                        State of Incorporation
                 ----------                        ----------------------

        Astor Products, Inc.                              Florida
        Crackin' Good, Inc.                               Florida
        Deep South Products, Inc.                         Florida
        Dixie Packers, Inc.                               Florida
        Economy Wholesale Distributors, Inc.              Florida
        Monterey Canning Co.                              California
        Save Rite Grocery Warehouse, Inc.                 Florida
        Superior Food Company                             Florida
        W-D (Bahamas) Limited                             Bahama Islands
          Bahamas Supermarkets Limited                    Bahama Islands
            The City Meat Markets Limited                 Bahama Islands
        Winn-Dixie Charlotte, Inc.                        Florida
        Winn-Dixie Logistics, Inc.                        Florida
        Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.                        Florida
        Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.                       Florida
        Winn-Dixie Procurement, Inc.                      Florida
        Winn-Dixie Raleigh, Inc.                          Florida
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 319 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 16, 2003.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2691) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and 
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for other 
purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for 
failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived except as follows: page 
84, line 21, through page 89; page 90, line 4 through line 9. During 
consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the 
Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member 
offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. 
Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. During consideration of the 
bill, points of order against amendments for failure to comply with clause 2(e) 
of rule XXI are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1725. WILLIAMS v. STATE.

Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to submit brief and

enumeration of errors. In his motion, appellant requests an extension of time to allow

appellate counsel to be appointed for appellant. Because it does appear from the

record that appellant did attempt to request indigent appellant counsel in the trial

court, we hereby remand this case to the trial court for it to determine whether to

appoint the appellant counsel. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

July 27, 2021

07/27/2021
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40495

Summary Calendar

In the Matter of: RAYMOND R. POWELL; THOMAS

 VEAZEY MILLER, Debtors.

RAYMOND R. POWELL; THOMAS

VEAZEY MILLER,

Appellants,

versus

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF VAN ALSTYNE,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(4:96-CV-58)

January 13, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Thomas Veazey Miller individually, and purportedly on behalf of Raymond
2

R. Powell, appeals the district court’s ruling that their attempt to appeal a decision

by the bankruptcy court in an adversary proceeding was not timely filed and,

accordingly, that the district court lacked jurisdiction. We affirm.

Miller filed for bankruptcy in the Eastern District of Texas. He filed therein

on behalf of Powell an adversary proceeding against First National Bank of

Van Alstyne. Miller is not an attorney. He alleged that the bank defrauded both

him and Powell. The bankruptcy court dismissed the complaint on June 30, 1995

under the authority of Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and Bankruptcy Rule 7012(b), finding

that the alleged cause of action neither arose under nor related to Title 11 of the

United States Code, the bankruptcy title. Powell and Miller did not file a notice of

appeal to the district court until December 19, 1995.

Under Bankruptcy Rule 8002 the notice of appeal had to be filed within 10

days of the order or decision appealed. The district court dismissed the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction, citing Bankruptcy Rule 8002. We find no error in this ruling.

Indeed it is eminently correct.

Appellants have moved for appointment of counsel and for the special

forfeiture by the bank of collateral profits. Both motions are DENIED.

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6170

In Re: RESTONEY ROBINSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-03-523)

Submitted: April 30, 2004 Decided: August 5, 2004

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Restoney Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Restoney Robinson petitions for writ of mandamus. He

seeks an order vacating his conviction and awarding him damages

from his former defense attorney. Mandamus relief is available

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and

there are no other means by which the relief sought could be

granted. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 860 F.2d 135, 138

(4th Cir. 1988); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).

Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in

extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist.

Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826

(4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for

appeal. See In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.

1979). The relief sought by Robinson is not available by way of

mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Russell G. Cole, hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First Ipswich
Bancorp;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
we have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
      including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
      within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
      quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our
      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
      procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report
      based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business
      issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
      the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
      issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
      to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ Russell G. Cole
-------------------
Russell G. Cole
Chief Executive Officer

November 2, 2007
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o(d));
and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 Date: September 9, 2010
    
    /s/ Joseph G. MahlerJoseph G. MahlerSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Corporate Secretary(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133628 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133628 COA: 265376 Wayne CC: 05-003842-01 NICHOLAS ASHMON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 15, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
|    |                                     |
|----|-------------------------------------|
| 3. | Payments and Benefits to Executive. |

----

----

|    |                                           |
|----|-------------------------------------------|
| 4. | Release and Waiver of Claims by Executive |

----

|    |                                             |
|----|---------------------------------------------|
| 5. | Release and Waiver of Claims by the Company |

|    |                 |
|----|-----------------|
| 6. | Acknowledgments |

----

|    |                                                      |
|----|------------------------------------------------------|
| 7. | Effect of This Agreement on the Employment Agreement |

|    |               |
|----|---------------|
| 8. | Non-Admission |

|    |                      |
|----|----------------------|
| 9. | Covenants Not to Sue |

|     |                                 |
|-----|---------------------------------|
| 10. | Noncompetition; Nonsolicitation |

----

|     |                                            |
|-----|--------------------------------------------|
| 11. | Nondisclosure of Confidential Information. |

----

|     |                               |
|-----|-------------------------------|
| 13. | Intellectual Property Rights. |

|     |                   |
|-----|-------------------|
| 14. | Nondisparagement. |

----

|     |                                        |
|-----|----------------------------------------|
| 15. | Company Remedies and Injunctive Relief |

|     |                                      |
|-----|--------------------------------------|
| 17. | Arbitration, Choice of Law and Venue |

----

|     |                |
|-----|----------------|
| 18. | Miscellaneous. |

|     |      |
|-----|------|
| 19. | 409A |

----

|     |                         |
|-----|-------------------------|
| 20. | Release Effective Date. |

----

----

----

----
----

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of World Acceptance Corporation; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 14, 2012 |   | /s/  A.A. McLean, II       |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                           |   | A.A. McLean III                      |
|                           |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Amar Scott, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[852 NYS2d 903]

Same memorandum as in *People v Fulton*(49 AD3d 1223 [2008]). Present-Hurlbutt, J.P., Smith, Centra, Green and Gorski, JJ.