alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Kees, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:
May 12, 2010



/S/ ROBERT L. KEESRobert L. KeesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal financial officer)




26
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60118 Conference Calendar

JOHNNY O’BRYANT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus THOMAS G. TAYLOR, Warden at Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility; ELMORE SELLERS, Deputy Warden at Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility; CAROL BOONE, Classification and Offender Service, Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility; KAREN TANNER, Official Court Reporter, 11th Circuit District Court; AELICIA THOMAS, Attorney, MSB # 10792; KENNETH L. THOMAS, Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:00-CV-259-D-B

-------------------- June 13, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Johnny O’Bryant, Jr., Mississippi prisoner # 41117, appeals,
pro se , the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. O’Bryant’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. O’Bryant seeks damages, claiming the defendants violated his rights, resulting in his false imprisonment. As O’Bryant has notNo. 01-60118 -2- shown that either his conviction, his sentence, or his probation revocation has been overturned, expunged, or otherwise invalidated, the district court properly dismissed his complaint as barred by Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486-87. See also Jackson v. Vannoy , 49 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir. 1995)( Heck applied to a probation revocation proceeding). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. The district court’s dismissal of O’Bryant’s complaint as frivolous counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). O’Bryant is cautioned that if he accumulates three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. MOTION DENIED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 23.2



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-51749
and 33-64343) of Wisconsin Electric Power Company of our report dated
February 3, 1997 relating to the financial statements of Northern States Power
Company, a Wisconsin Corporation ("NSP-WI"), appearing in NSP-WI's Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1996, which is incorporated by reference in
this Form 10-K.





/s/Price Waterhouse LLP
------------------------
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 27, 1997
IV

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 254

Recognizing the ‘‘Code Adam’’ child safety program, commending retail businesses and public establishments that have implemented programs to

protect children from an abduction or lost scenario, and urging retail

businesses and public establishments that have not implemented such

programs to consider doing so.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 2003

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́,

Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. FROST, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. ROTHMAN, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. WILSON

of South Carolina, and Mr. WEXLER) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the ‘‘Code Adam’’ child safety program, commending retail businesses and public establishments that

have implemented programs to protect children from an

abduction or lost scenario, and urging retail businesses

and public establishments that have not implemented

such programs to consider doing so.

Whereas protecting children is one of society’s greatest responsibilities;

Whereas child abduction, an unconscionable and horrendous

crime, has received much media attention;
2

•HRES 254 IH

Whereas parents, and all other adults, must be ever vigilant

in public places to protect children, who by their very nature are trusting and unsuspecting, from those depraved

and vile individuals who would prey on them;

Whereas recognizing the risk of child abduction, some retail

businesses, libraries, museums, hospitals, and other public and private establishments have developed safety procedures and programs designed to prevent abductors

from using crowds of people as cover for nefarious acts;

Whereas one of the most successful programs to prevent child

abduction is the ‘‘Code Adam’’ alarm developed in 1994

and implemented by Wal-Mart stores and SAM’S Clubs

throughout the Nation;

Whereas the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children has been instrumental in helping to implement the

‘‘Code Adam’’ child safety program at retail and businesses and public establishments; and

Whereas, named in tribute to 6-year-old Adam Walsh who

was abducted from a shopping mall in the State of Florida and murdered in 1981, the ‘‘Code Adam’’ alarm signals that there is a missing child and alerts designated

employees in the affected retail business, public establishment or library to abandon their normal responsibilities

and, in a coordinated and prearranged organized manner,

to begin searching for the child and monitoring the establishment exits to ensure that the child is not removed

from the establishment: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the ‘‘Code Adam’’ child safety program, commends

3 all retail businesses and public establishments that have

4 implemented such programs to protect children from an
3

•HRES 254 IH

1 abduction or lost scenario, and urges retail business and

2 public establishments that have not implemented such pro3 grams to consider doing so.

Æ
EXHIBIT 21

            SUBSIDIARIES AND JOINT VENTURE OF THE COMPANY


As of March 31, 2002, the Company owned a majority to 100% of the
following securities of the following subsidiaries and Joint Venture:

                                 State (Country) of  Percentage of Voting
Subsidiary                         Incorporation      Securities Owned
----------                       ------------------  --------------------
San Luis Estates, Inc.               Colorado              100.00%
Universal Developers, Inc.           Wisconsin             100.00%
Homespan Realty Co., Inc.            Wisconsin             100.00%
Ecomm Group Inc.                     Wisconsin             100.00%
San Sebastian Gold Mines, Inc.       Nevada                 82.50%
Mineral San Sebastian, S.A. de C.V.  (El Salvador,
                                     Central America)       52.00%
Commerce/Sanseb Joint Venture        Wisconsin (and
                                     El Salvador,
                                     Central America)       90.00%
EX-10.22






Exhibit 10.22




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE

NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE LONG-TERM INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN

(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2008)




     The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company hereby adopts this
Amendment No. 1 to the NACCO Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Long-Term Incentive Bonus Plan
(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2008) (the “Plan”) effective November 11, 2008.
Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters that are defined in the Plan are used
herein as so defined.



Section 1




     Section 2(g) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new sentence to the end
thereof:



     “Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term ‘Participant’ shall also include those employees
described in Section 5(a)(ii) hereof.”



Section 2




     The current Section “5(a)” of the Plan is hereby renumbered as Section “5(a)(i)” of the Plan
and a new Section 5(a)(ii) is hereby added to the end thereof, to read as follows:



     “(ii) Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Compensation Committee
shall provide an Award during the month of December, 2008 to any employee who is a participant in
one of the annual incentive compensation plans of the Company’s subsidiaries on October 15, 2008 in
an amount equal to one Award Share per employee, and a corresponding cash Award in an amount equal
to the amount deemed necessary by the Compensation Committee for such employee to pay the taxes
associated with the receipt of such Award Share; provided, however, that (A) the maximum number of
Award Shares to be issued under this Section 5(a)(ii) shall not exceed 600 Award Shares and (B) any
employee who is classified by the Company as a non-resident alien, a named executive officer (as
determined in accordance with Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K and shall refer to those executive
officers for whom disclosure was required pursuant to Item 402(c) of Regulation S-K in the
Company’s most recent proxy statement) or as an officer (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (or any successor rule to the same effect), as in effect
from time to time) shall not be entitled to receive any Award Shares under this Section 5(a)(ii).”



1
Consent of Frontier Oil and Refining Company to theSecond Amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement (Uncommitted) dated as ofMaech 8, 2007.

Consent of Frontier Oil and Refining Company to theSecond Amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement (Uncommitted) dated as of May16, 2007.

Consent of Frontier Oil and Refining Company to theSecond Amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement (Uncommitted) dated as ofJanuary 20, 2009.

----

March 8, 2007

----

----

----

----

| ADMINISTRATIVE      AGENT: | BNP    PARIBAS |
|----------------------------|----------------|

----

----

| LENDERS: | UNION      BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A., as Syndication Agent and a  Lender |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BAYERISCHE      HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH, as a  Lender |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

----

| ADMINISTRATIVE      AGENT: | BNP    PARIBAS |
|----------------------------|----------------|

----

May 16, 2007

----

----

| Name      of Lender                                     | Percentage      Share | Commitment      |
|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------|
| BNP      Paribas                                        | 45.0%                 | $90,000,000.00  |
| Union      Bank of California, N.A.                     | 20.0%                 | $40,000,000.00  |
| Bayerishe      Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch | 17.5%                 | $35,000,000.00  |
| Allied      Irish Banks, p.l.c.                         | 17.5%                 | $35,000,000.00  |
| TOTAL                                                   | 100.00%               | $200,000,000.00 |

----

----

| ADMINISTRATIVE      AGENT: | BNP    PARIBAS |
|----------------------------|----------------|

----

----

| LENDERS: | UNION      BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A., as Syndication Agent and a  Lender |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BAYERISCHE      HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH, as a  Lender |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | ALLIED      IRISH BANKS, p.l.c. |
|--------|---------------------------------|

----

January 7, 2009

----

----

----

----

| ADMINISTRATIVE      AGENT: | BNP    PARIBAS |
|----------------------------|----------------|

----

----

| LENDERS: | UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA,      N.A., as Syndication Agent and aLender |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND      VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH, as a  Lender |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | ALLIED IRISH BANKS,      p.l.c., as      a Lender |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           9
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS         9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JUL-01-1998   JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1998   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                              65,434        0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>              4,593         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                    0             0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                    0             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>         421,403       0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>              91,339        0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                93,365        0
<LOANS>                             1,323,691     0
<ALLOWANCE>                         19,305        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      2,025,607     0
<DEPOSITS>                          1,608,314     0
<SHORT-TERM>                        208,650       0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                 26,734        0
<LONG-TERM>                         19,952        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0             0
<PREFERRED>                         0             0
<COMMON>                            86,959        0
<OTHER-SE>                          74,998        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>      2,025,607     0
<INTEREST-LOAN>                     31,019        91,047
<INTEREST-INVEST>                   7,293         22,958
<INTEREST-OTHER>                    405           1,414
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                    38,717        115,419
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                  16,458        49,319
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  19,699        59,434
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>               19,018        55,985
<LOAN-LOSSES>                       1,223         3,829
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                  447           919
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                     15,666        42,340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     6,580         22,773
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>          4,439         15,105
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0             0
<CHANGES>                           0             0
<NET-INCOME>                        4,439         15,105
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.18          0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.17          0.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                      4.12          4.09
<LOANS-NON>                         4,824         4,824
<LOANS-PAST>                        6,879         6,879
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                    0             0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                     0             0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                    18,800        17,797
<CHARGE-OFFS>                       840           2,747
<RECOVERIES>                        122           426
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                   19,305        19,305
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                19,305        19,305
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                 0             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>             0             0
        

</TABLE>
No. 1234.

#### Renninger *v.*New York.

June 3, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the County Court of Delaware County, New York, denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2357

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SIMON BANKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:04-po-00248-JCC-1)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Simon Banks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Simon Banks seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying his motion for ECF Authority Through Pacer. This court 

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order

Banks seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 09, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 09, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0211. JESSICA EDENFIELD et al. v. SUSAN BRACK . Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: SUCV2019000619
Exhibit 10.7





Exhibit 10.7




AMENDMENT

TO THE

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC.

1999 DIRECTORS’ STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




This Amendment to the Financial Institutions, Inc. 1999 Director’s Stock Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) is adopted pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan by the Board of Directors of Financial
Institutions, Inc. (the “Company”).



1. Section 7 of the Plan shall be amended to add the following provision to the end of such
Section:




Notwithstanding the forgoing, the Board may adopt less favorable rules than set forth
above to apply to a director’s stock option award when a director ceases to be a
member of the Board, including, without limitation, forfeiting options that are not
vested when the director’s employment as a director terminates. Such rules shall be
set forth in the director’s stock option agreement.



In witness whereof, Financial Institutions, Inc. has caused this instrument to be executed as
of April 23, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	/s/ Ronald A. Miller	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Corporate Secretary
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements pertaining to The Wiser Oil Company 1991 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, (Form S-8 Nos.
333-29973 and 33-62441) and in the Registration Statements pertaining to The Wiser Oil Company 1991 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended, (Form S-8 Nos. 333-68822, 333-22525, and 333-15083), of our report dated February 27,
2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Wiser Oil Company and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

---

Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas

March 29, 2004
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
         WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
           FORM 10-QSB/A No. 1



(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE
    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the quarterly period ended
August 31, 1996 

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE
    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the transition period from
_________ to _________



     Commission File Number 0-20936





                 DIVERSIFAX, INC.           
 
  (Name of small business issuer in its
charter)


Delaware                                 
      13-3637458       
(State or Other Jurisdiction of         
     (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)           
    Identification No.)



39 Stringham Avenue, Valley Stream, New
York       11580     
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) 
         (Zip Code)


Issuer's Telephone Number  (516) 872-
0650   



     Check whether the issuer (1) filed
all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.  YES
X  NO __


There were 14,040,215 shares outstanding
of the issuer's common stock, par value
$.001 per share, as of July 10, 1996.

<PAGE>

               SIGNATURES
     


In accordance with the requirements of
the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.


     




                            DIVERSIFAX, INC.

Date:  March 20, 1997    
                            By:  /s/ Irwin A. Horowitz                         
    
                            ___________________________
                            Irwin A.Horowitz, President 
                            and Chief Executive Officer
                            (Principle Executive, 
                            Financial,and Accounting
                            Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Kees, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 12, 2009



/s/ ROBERT L. KEESRobert L. KeesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal financial officer)




28