[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39743-39748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17607]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Parts 679 and 680

[Docket No. 170412391-7391-01]
RIN 0648-BG84


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea 
and Aleutian Islands Management Area; American Fisheries Act; Bering 
Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS issues a proposed rule to implement Amendment 48 to the 
Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner 
Crabs (Crab FMP) and a regulatory amendment to revise regulations 
implementing the American Fisheries Act (AFA) Program and the Crab 
Rationalization (CR) Program. This proposed rule would revise how NMFS 
determines the amount of limited access privileges held and used by 
groups in the Western Alaska Community Development Quota Program (CDQ 
Program) for the purposes of managing the excessive share limits under 
the AFA Program and the CR Program. This proposed rule is necessary to 
align regulations and the Crab FMP to be consistent with an amendment 
to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) and NMFS' current method of managing excessive 
share limits for CDQ groups in the AFA Program and the CR Program. This 
proposed rule is intended to promote the goals and objectives of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Crab FMP, and other applicable law.

DATES: Submit comments on or before September 21, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number NOAA-NMFS-2017-
0038, by either of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2017-0038, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon, 
complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
    <bullet> Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant 
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region 
NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, 
AK 99802-1668.
    Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other 
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period 
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the 
public record and will be posted for public viewing on 
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying 
information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information, 
or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender 
will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter 
``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
    Electronic copies of Amendment 48 to the Crab FMP, the Regulatory 
Impact Review (RIR), and the Categorical Exclusion prepared for this 
proposed action are available from http://www.regulations.gov or from 
the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
    The CR Program Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), RIR, and Final 
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, as well as the AFA Program EIS and 
RIR, are available from the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keeley Kent, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for Action

    NMFS manages the pollock fisheries in the exclusive economic zone 
(EEZ) off Alaska under the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of 
the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI FMP). NMFS 
manages the king and Tanner crab fisheries in the U.S. EEZ of the 
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) under the Crab FMP. The North 
Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared, and NMFS 
approved, the BSAI FMP and the Crab FMP under the authority of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Regulations governing and 
implementing the BSAI FMP appear at 50 CFR parts 600 and 679. 
Regulations governing and implementing the Crab FMP appear at 50 CFR 
parts 600 and 680.
    A notice of availability for Amendment 48 to the Crab FMP was 
published in the Federal Register on August 3, 2017. Comment on 
Amendment 48 is invited through October 2, 2017. All relevant written 
comments received by the end of the comment period, whether 
specifically directed to the FMP amendment, this proposed rule, or 
both, will be considered in the approval/disapproval decision for 
Amendment 48 and addressed in the response to comments in the final 
rule.

Background

    This proposed rule would modify regulations that specify how NMFS 
determines holding and use of limited access privileges (LAPs) for the 
purposes of managing excessive share limits for CDQ groups under the 
AFA Program and the CR Program. The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires NMFS 
to establish excessive share limits to prevent excessive consolidation 
of harvesting and processing LAPs in order to maintain an appropriate 
distribution of economic and social benefits for fishery participants 
and communities. NMFS has adopted regulations under its LAP programs to 
ensure that no person holds or uses more LAPs than authorized under 
excessive share limits established for each LAP program. Section 305(i) 
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act describes the Western Alaska Community 
Development Quota Program (CDQ Program) (16 U.S.C. 1855(i)). 
Regulations at 50 CFR 679.2 define the term ``CDQ group'' as an entity 
identified as eligible for the CDQ Program under 16 U.S.C. 
1855(i)(1)(D).

[[Page 39744]]

    This proposed rule would revise the regulations that prescribe the 
calculation of excessive share limits for CDQ groups for two LAP 
programs: The AFA Program and the CR Program. CDQ groups participate in 
LAP programs, including the AFA and the CR Program, by purchasing 
harvesting and processing privileges and through ownership of vessels 
and processors that participate in these fisheries. The Magnuson-
Stevens Act was amended by the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation 
Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-241; the Coast Guard Act) to specify the 
method that NMFS must use for monitoring excessive share limits as they 
apply to CDQ groups--the proportional or ``individual and collective'' 
rule. Section 305(i)(1)(F)(i) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended 
by the Coast Guard Act, provides that CDQ groups shall be subject to 
any excessive share ownership, harvesting, or processing limitations in 
the fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area 
only to the extent of the CDQ group's proportional ownership (16 U.S.C. 
1855(i)(1)(F)(i)).
    NMFS has implemented in practice the method specified in the 2006 
amendment to the Magnuson-Stevens Act for CDQ groups to monitor 
excessive share limits in the AFA Program and the CR Program; however, 
the regulations for the AFA Program and the CR Program and the Crab FMP 
have not been revised to be consistent with the 2006 amendment to the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
    The following sections describe (1) excessive share limits, which 
are also called holding and use caps, (2) AFA Program use caps, (3) CR 
Program holding and use caps, (4) CDQ Program holding and use caps, and 
(5) this proposed rule and the anticipated effects of the action.

Excessive Share Limits

    Section 301(a)(4) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act specifies that if 
conservation and management measures allocate or assign fishing 
privileges, the measures must be carried out so that no particular 
individual, corporation, or other entity acquires an excessive share of 
such privileges (16 U.S.C. 1851(a)(4)). Section 303A(c)(5)(D) of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires regional fishery management councils to 
establish excessive share limits for LAP programs to prevent excessive 
accumulation of privileges by participants in the LAP programs (16 
U.S.C. 1853a(c)(5)(D)). The intent of these limits or caps is to 
prevent excessive consolidation in the harvesting and processing 
sectors in order to maintain an appropriate distribution of economic 
and social benefits for fishery participants and communities. Because 
determination of excessive shares must consider the specific 
circumstances of each fishery, the Council has implemented different 
excessive share limits in the LAP programs in Alaska's fisheries, 
including the AFA and CR Programs.
    NMFS implemented use caps for the AFA Program in 2002 (67 FR 79692; 
December 30, 2002) and holding and use caps for the CR Program in 2005 
(70 FR 10174; March 2, 2005). The regulations prohibit a person from 
using more than the harvesting and processing limits established in the 
AFA Program and from holding and using more than a specific portion of 
the LAPs allocated under the CR Program. Under 50 CFR 679.2, ``person'' 
includes individuals, corporations, partnerships, associations, and 
other non-individual entities. To monitor holdings and use of LAPs, 
NMFS determines what portion of a program's harvesting and processing 
privileges a person holds and uses to ensure that no person holds or 
uses more privileges than authorized by the applicable excessive share 
cap.
    NMFS determines a person's holding and use of a LAP in the AFA 
Program and CR Program by summing (1) the amount directly held and used 
by that person, and (2) the amount held and used by that person 
indirectly through an ownership interest in or control of another 
entity that also holds and uses the LAP. Businesses that hold and use 
LAPs in the AFA Program and the CR Program are often composed of 
multiple owners that have ownership interests in multiple fishing 
businesses. In cases where a LAP is held by a business entity with more 
than one owner, NMFS applies the holding and use caps to each entity 
that holds or controls the LAP to monitor whether those entities each 
exceed the established caps. Ownership attribution refers to the method 
NMFS uses to assess the relationships between different entities that 
participate in LAP programs.
    NMFS uses two ownership attribution methods to determine holdings 
and use of LAPs. These two methods for attributing ownership and use of 
a LAP are commonly known as the ``individual and collective rule'' and 
the ``10-percent rule.'' Under the individual and collective rule, NMFS 
attributes holding and use of LAPs by one person proportionally to 
their ownership in or control of another entity that holds and uses 
LAPs. For example, if Company A has a 15 percent ownership of Company B 
that holds LAPs, Company A would be attributed 15 percent of Company 
B's holding and use of the LAPs. In contrast, under the 10-percent 
rule, a person is attributed 100 percent of an entity's LAPs if that 
person owns or otherwise controls ten percent or more of that entity. 
Thus, if Company A holds or controls 10 percent or more of Company B, 
then 100 percent of Company B's holdings and use of LAPs are attributed 
to Company A. When a person owns or controls 10 percent or more of 
another entity, the individual and collective rule is less restrictive 
than the 10-percent rule because a person is only attributed holding 
and use in proportion to how much that person owns or controls of other 
entities, rather than attributing 100 percent of the other entity's LAP 
holdings once the 10-percent ownership or control threshold is met. 
Thus, under a holding and use cap, the individual and collective rule 
would allow a person to hold and use more LAPs than if the person was 
evaluated using the 10-percent rule.

AFA Program Use Caps

    Congress passed the AFA in October 1998 to implement additional 
U.S. ownership requirements for vessels harvesting fish from the EEZ. 
The purpose of the AFA was to tighten U.S. ownership standards that had 
been exploited under the Commercial Fishing Industry Vessel Anti-
Reflagging Act of 1987 (Pub. L. 100-239) and to provide the BSAI 
pollock fleet the opportunity to conduct their fishery in a more 
rational manner (i.e., stopping the race for fish) while protecting 
non-AFA participants in the other fisheries. The AFA established sector 
allocations in the BSAI pollock fishery, determined eligible vessels 
and processors, allowed for the formation of cooperatives, set limits 
on the participation of AFA vessels in other fisheries, and imposed 
special catch weighing and monitoring requirements on AFA vessels. The 
AFA also divided the available BSAI pollock directed fishing allowance 
among three harvesting sectors, after CDQ allocations and an amount for 
incidental catch of pollock by non-AFA vessels were deducted.
    Section 210(e) of the AFA set out excessive harvesting and 
processing limits for participants. Section 210(e)(1) of the AFA 
restricts an individual, corporation, or other entity to harvesting no 
more than 17.5 percent of the pollock available to be harvested in the 
directed pollock fishery. This limit is codified at 50 CFR 
679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6). Every year, this limit is published in the 
annual harvest specifications (82 FR 11826; February 27, 2017).

[[Page 39745]]

    Section 210(e)(2) of the AFA directed the Council to create 
management measures to prevent any particular individual or entity from 
processing an excessive share of pollock available in the directed 
pollock fishery. The Council and NMFS set this limit at 30 percent of 
the sum of the directed fishing allowances for pollock. This limit is 
codified at 50 CFR 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7). Every year, this limit is 
published in the annual harvest specifications (82 FR 11826; February 
27, 2017).
    Section 210(e)(3) of the AFA also specified that any entity in 
which 10 percent or more of the interest is held or controlled by 
another individual or entity shall be considered to be the same entity 
as the other individual or entity for purposes of monitoring the 
harvesting and processing use caps. This section of the AFA directed 
NMFS to use the 10-percent rule to determine the use of AFA Program 
harvesting and processing privileges. NMFS implemented this AFA 
requirement in part by defining an ``AFA entity'' at 50 CFR 679.2 as a 
group of affiliated individuals, corporations, or other business 
concerns that harvest or process pollock in the Bering Sea directed 
pollock fishery. The proposed rule to implement the AFA Program stated 
that the concept of ``affiliation'' is central to the definition of 
``AFA entity'' (66 FR 65028, 65049; December 17, 2001). As the December 
2001 proposed rule explained, ``affiliation'' means a relationship 
between two or more individuals, corporations, or other business 
concerns in which one concern directly or indirectly owns a 10 percent 
or greater interest in the other, exerts 10 percent or greater control 
over the other, or has the power to exert 10 percent or greater control 
over the other; or a third individual, corporation, or other business 
concern directly or indirectly owns a 10 percent or greater interest in 
both, exerts 10 percent or greater control over both, or has the power 
to exert 10 percent or greater control over both (see regulations at 
Sec.  679.2 for the definition of ``affiliation'' and Section 2.6.3 of 
the RIR for more information).

CR Program Use Caps

    The CR Program was implemented on April 1, 2005 (70 FR 10174; March 
2, 2005). The CR Program established a LAP program for nine crab 
fisheries in the BSAI and assigned quota share (QS) to persons based on 
their historic participation in one or more of those nine BSAI crab 
fisheries during a specific period. Each year, a person who holds QS 
may receive an exclusive harvest privilege for a portion of the annual 
total allowable catch (TAC). This annual exclusive harvest privilege is 
called individual fishing quota (IFQ).
    NMFS also issued processor quota share (PQS) under the CR Program. 
Each year, PQS yields an exclusive privilege to process a portion of 
the IFQ in each of the nine BSAI crab fisheries. This annual exclusive 
processing privilege is called individual processor quota (IPQ). Only a 
portion of the QS issued yields IFQ that is required to be delivered to 
a processor with IPQ. Each year there is a one-to-one match of the 
total pounds of IFQ that must be delivered to a processor with IPQ with 
the total pounds of IPQ issued in each crab fishery.
    When the Council recommended the CR Program, it expressed concern 
about the potential for excessive consolidation of QS and PQS, in which 
too few persons control all of the QS or PQS and the resulting annual 
IFQ and IPQ. The Council determined that excessive consolidation could 
have adverse effects on crab markets, price setting negotiations 
between harvesters and processors, employment opportunities for 
harvesting and processing crew, tax revenue to communities in which 
crab are landed, and other factors considered and described in the CR 
Program EIS. To address this concern, the CR Program includes limits on 
the amount of QS and PQS that a person can hold and the amount of IFQ 
and IPQ that a person can use.
    The CR Program has QS and IFQ holding and use caps that vary by 
fishery because of different fleet characteristics and differences in 
historical dependency of participants on different crab fisheries. 50 
CFR 680.42(a)(2) specifies that NMFS uses the individual and collective 
rule to apply holding and use caps for QS and IFQ for all CR Program 
participants, including CDQ groups, as recommended by the Council for 
monitoring harvesting privileges (see Section 2.7 of the RIR for more 
information).
    For processing privileges, the CR Program limits a person to 
holding no more than 30 percent of the PQS initially issued in the 
fishery, and to using no more than the amount of IPQ resulting from 30 
percent of the PQS initially issued in a given fishery, with a limited 
exemption for persons receiving more than 30 percent of the initially-
issued PQS (50 CFR 680.42(b)). 50 CFR 680.42(b)(3) specifies that NMFS 
uses the 10-percent rule to monitor holding and use caps for PQS and 
IPQ for all CR Program participants as recommended by the Council and 
addressed in the preamble to the proposed rule for the CR Program (69 
FR 63200, 63219 & 63226; October 29, 2004).

Use Caps for CDQ Groups

    The CDQ Program was established by the Council and NMFS in 1992, 
and in 1996, authorization for the Program was incorporated into the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act. The purpose of the CDQ Program is (1) to provide 
eligible western Alaska villages with the opportunity to participate 
and invest in fisheries in the BSAI, (2) to support economic 
development in western Alaska, (3) to alleviate poverty and provide 
economic and social benefits for residents of western Alaska, and (4) 
to achieve sustainable and diversified local economies in western 
Alaska (16 U.S.C. 1855(i)(1)(A)).
    Section 305(i) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act describes the CDQ 
Program and identifies the villages eligible to participate in the CDQ 
Program through the six entities specified in Section 305(i)(1)(D) as 
the CDQ groups (16 U.S.C. 1855(i)). Regulations at 50 CFR 679.2 define 
the term ``CDQ group'' as an entity identified as eligible for the CDQ 
Program under 16 U.S.C. 1855(i)(1)(D). The CDQ Program consists of six 
different non-profit managing organizations (CDQ groups) representing 
different geographical regions in Alaska. The CDQ Program receives 
annual allocations of TACs for a variety of commercially valuable 
species in the BSAI groundfish, crab, and halibut fisheries, which are 
in turn allocated among the CDQ groups (see Section 2.8 of the RIR).
    The Secretary of Commerce approved regulations establishing the CDQ 
Program pollock allocation (57 FR 54936; November 23, 1992). When the 
AFA Program was implemented, the CDQ Program received an allocation of 
10 percent of the Bering Sea pollock TAC (67 FR 79692, 79696; December 
30, 2002). CDQ groups participate in the AFA Program primarily through 
ownership (wholly or partially) in vessels authorized to fish for 
Bering Sea pollock under the AFA. Vessel ownership varies by CDQ group 
(see Section 2.8.1 of the RIR). When the CR Program was implemented in 
2005, the CDQ Program received an allocation of 10 percent of the TACs 
for some CR Program fisheries (70 FR 10174, 10176-77; March 2, 2005). 
In addition to the CDQ allocations, the CDQ groups hold QS and PQS 
directly as well as indirectly through ownership in other entities that 
hold QS and PQS (see Section 2.8.3 of the RIR).

[[Page 39746]]

Need for This Proposed Rule

    In 2006, Congress passed the Coast Guard Act (Pub. L. 109-241), 
which amended the CDQ Program to give CDQ groups and their communities 
greater autonomy based on recommendations from the State of Alaska's 
Blue Ribbon Panel. Section 416(a) of the Coast Guard Act revised 
section 305(i) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and made significant changes 
to the management and oversight of the CDQ Program. The amendments to 
section 305(i) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act were intended to promote the 
ability of CDQ groups to responsibly manage their allocations similar 
to the LAPs provided by NMFS to most other participants in the BSAI 
fisheries, while promoting the goals of the CDQ Program (see Section 
2.8 of the RIR).
    The Coast Guard Act also revised section 305(i)(1)(F)(i) of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act to specify that CDQ groups would be subject to 
excessive share ownership, harvesting, and processing limitations 
proportional to their ownership of entities holding such privileges 
(i.e., holdings and use of LAPs by CDQ groups are to be determined by 
the ``individual and collective rule'') (16 U.S.C. 1855(i)(1)(F)(i)). 
This requires NMFS to use the individual and collective rule to 
determine holding and use of harvesting and processing privileges for 
CDQ groups under all LAP programs in the BSAI. After the 2006 amendment 
to the Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS reviewed its methods for determining 
holding and use of harvesting and processing privileges in all LAP 
programs in the BSAI and determined that modifications were required 
for the methods used to determine CDQ group holdings and use for (1) 
harvesting and processing privileges under the AFA and (2) PQS and IPQ 
under the CR Program. These modifications were required because the 
regulations implementing these programs specified that NMFS would use 
the 10-percent rule to determine holding and use of these harvesting 
and processing privileges for CDQ groups.

This Proposed Rule and Its Anticipated Effects

    This proposed rule would revise 50 CFR 679.2, 679.7(k)(6) and (7), 
680.2, and 680.42(b).
    This proposed rule would revise the AFA Program to specify that 
NMFS uses the individual and collective rule for CDQ groups to 
attribute harvesting and processing privileges of AFA pollock 
proportionally to the CDQ groups' ownership of vessels and processors 
active in those fisheries. For example, if a CDQ group holds 15 percent 
ownership of an entity that holds and uses AFA harvesting and 
processing privileges, this proposed rule would specify that the CDQ 
group is attributed 15 percent of the harvest or processing privileges 
of that company for purposes of monitoring excessive harvesting and 
processing use caps under the AFA.
    The proposed rule would also implement Amendment 48 to the Crab FMP 
and revise the CR Program to specify that NMFS uses the individual and 
collective rule for CDQ groups to attribute holding and use of PQS and 
IPQ based on the CDQ groups' proportional ownership of entities that 
hold and use PQS and IPQ. For example, if a CDQ group holds 15 percent 
ownership of a company that holds or uses PQS or IPQ, this proposed 
rule would specify that the CDQ group is attributed 15 percent of the 
holding or use of that PQS or IPQ. The proposed rule would not alter 
the regulations for the QS and IFQ holding and use caps under the CR 
Program because current CR Program regulations specify that NMFS uses 
the individual and collective rule for all program participants, 
including CDQ groups, to attribute any participants' holding and use of 
QS and IFQ based on their proportional ownership of entities that hold 
and use QS and IFQ.
    NMFS has used the individual and collective rule for CDQ group 
ownership attribution for both the AFA Program and the CR Program since 
enactment of the Coast Guard Act; however, the regulations and the Crab 
FMP have not been updated to reflect this change. This proposed rule 
would update the regulations and the Crab FMP to be consistent with 
NMFS' current method of ownership attribution for CDQ groups and the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act. This proposed rule would benefit CDQ groups and 
the public by clarifying the method NMFS uses to attribute holding and 
use of harvesting and processing privileges by CDQ groups for purposes 
of monitoring holding and use caps for the AFA and CR Programs.

Classification

    Pursuant to sections 304(b)(1)(A) and 305(d) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this 
proposed rule is consistent with Amendment 48, the Crab FMP, other 
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, 
subject to further consideration of comments received during the public 
comment period.
    This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for 
the purposes of Executive Order 12866. The Chief Counsel for Regulation 
of the Department of Commerce certified to the Chief Counsel for 
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA) that this proposed 
rule, if adopted, would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. NMFS requests comments on the 
decision to certify this proposed rule. The factual basis for this 
determination is as follows:
    This proposed action would revise regulations and the Crab FMP so 
that they are consistent with the ownership attribution method mandated 
by the Magnuson-Stevens Act for CDQ groups for monitoring limitations 
on the holding and use of harvesting and processing privileges in the 
AFA and CR Programs.
    The CDQ groups would be the directly regulated entities under the 
proposed regulatory revisions. All six of the CDQ groups are non-profit 
corporations and are considered small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act. As NMFS, one of the agencies that manages these 
holding and use limitations, has already implemented these provisions 
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act in practice, this proposed action is not 
expected to materially change how any small entities are regulated, nor 
is the proposed action expected to impose significant compliance costs 
or materially change how any small entities comply with the applicable 
regulations. Rather, this proposed rule would benefit CDQ groups and 
the public by clarifying the method NMFS uses to attribute holding and 
use of harvesting and processing privileges by CDQ groups for purposes 
of monitoring holding and use caps for the AFA and CR Programs. This 
proposed action therefore is not expected to have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of the small entities regulated 
by this proposed action--the CDQ groups. As a result, an initial 
regulatory flexibility analysis is not required, and none has been 
prepared.
    The economic analysis contained in the RIR for this action (see 
ADDRESSES) further describes the regulatory and operational 
characteristics of the CDQ Program, including the participation of CDQ 
groups in the AFA Program and the CR Program, the history of this 
action, and the details of the alternatives considered for this action, 
including the preferred alternative.

Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements

    This rule references collection-of-information requirements subject 
to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), which

[[Page 39747]]

have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 
OMB Control Number 0648-0514. The annual application for a crab IFQ 
permit and the application for a crab IPQ permit are mentioned in this 
rule; however, there are no changes to these forms or to who is 
required to submit the forms for this proposed rule, and therefore 
there would be no change in burden or cost.
    Send comments on these or any other aspects of the collection of 
information, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES), and by email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b5452495a44486e79767268687274755b747679357e746b357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="602f2932213f3315020d091313090f0e200f0d024e050f104e070f16">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to 202-395-5806.
    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is 
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to penalty for 
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the 
requirement of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. All currently approved NOAA 
collections of information may be viewed at: http://www.cio.noaa.gov/services_programs/prasubs.html.

Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With This 
Proposed Rule

    No relevant Federal rules have been identified that would 
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.

List of Subjects

50 CFR Part 679

    Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

50 CFR Part 680

    Alaska, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: August 15, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50 
CFR part 679 and part 680 as follows:

PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA

0
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 679 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.; 
Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 111-281.

0
2. In Sec.  679.2, revise the definitions for ``AFA entity'' and 
``Affiliation for the purpose of defining AFA and the Rockfish 
Program'' to read as follows:


Sec.  679.2  Definitions.

* * * * *
    AFA entity means a group of affiliated individuals, corporations, 
or other business concerns, except for a CDQ group, that harvests or 
processes pollock in the BS directed pollock fishery.
* * * * *
    Affiliation for the purpose of defining AFA and the Rockfish 
Program means a relationship between two or more individuals, 
corporations, or other business concerns, except CDQ groups, in which 
one concern directly or indirectly owns a 10 percent or greater 
interest in another, exerts control over another, or has the power to 
exert control over another; or a third individual, corporation, or 
other business concern directly or indirectly owns a 10 percent or 
greater interest in both, exerts control over both, or has the power to 
exert control over both.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec.  679.7 revise paragraphs (k)(6) and (k)(7) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  679.7  Prohibitions.

* * * * *
    (k) * * *
    (6) Excessive harvesting shares. It is unlawful for an AFA entity 
or a CDQ group to harvest, through a fishery cooperative or otherwise, 
an amount of BS pollock that exceeds the 17.5 percent excessive share 
limit specified under Sec.  679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6). A CDQ group's 
harvest of BS pollock will be calculated through its proportional 
ownership of individuals, corporations, or other business concerns that 
harvest BS pollock. The owners and operators of the individual vessels 
comprising the AFA entity or CDQ group that harvest BS pollock will be 
held jointly and severally liable for exceeding the excessive 
harvesting share limit.
    (7) Excessive processing shares. It is unlawful for an AFA entity 
or a CDQ group to process an amount of BS pollock that exceeds the 30-
percent excessive share limit specified under Sec.  
679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7). The amount of BS pollock processed by a CDQ 
group will be calculated through its proportional ownership of 
individuals, corporations, or other business concerns that process BS 
pollock. The owners and operators of the individual processors 
comprising the AFA entity or CDQ group that process BS pollock will be 
held jointly and severally liable for exceeding the excessive 
processing share limit.
* * * * *

PART 680--SHELLFISH FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF 
ALASKA

0
4. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 680 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1862; Pub. L. 109-241; Pub. L. 109-479.

0
5. In Sec.  680.2, revise the introductory text to the definition for 
``Affiliation'' and the introductory text of paragraph (1) of the 
definition for ``Affiliation'' to read as follows:


Sec.  680.2  Definitions.

* * * * *
    Affiliation means a relationship between two or more entities, 
except for CDQ groups, in which one directly or indirectly owns or 
controls a 10 percent or greater interest in, or otherwise controls, 
another, or a third entity directly or indirectly owns or controls a 10 
percent or greater interest in, or otherwise controls, both. For the 
purpose of this definition, the following terms are further defined:
    (1) Entity. An entity may be an individual, corporation, 
association, partnership, joint-stock company, trust, or any other type 
of legal entity, except for a CDQ group, any receiver, trustee in 
bankruptcy or similar official or liquidating agent, or any organized 
group of persons whether incorporated or not, that holds direct or 
indirect interest in:
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec.  680.42, revise paragraphs (b)(3)(ii), (b)(3)(iii), and 
(b)(3)(iv) to read as follows:


Sec.  680.42  Limitations on use of QS, PQS, IFQ, and IPQ.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (ii) Is not a CDQ group and directly or indirectly owns a 10 
percent or greater interest in an entity that holds PQS.
    (iii) A person that is not a CDQ group and holds PQS is limited to 
a PQS use cap that is calculated based on the sum of all PQS held by 
that PQS holder and all PQS held by any affiliate of the PQS holder. A 
CDQ group that holds PQS is limited to a PQS use cap that is calculated 
based on the sum of all PQS held, individually or collectively, by that 
CDQ group.

[[Page 39748]]

    (iv) A person that is not a CDQ group and holds IPQ is limited to 
an IPQ use cap that is calculated based on the sum of all IPQ held by 
that IPQ holder and all IPQ held by any affiliate of the IPQ holder. A 
CDQ group that holds IPQ is limited to an IPQ use cap that is 
calculated based on the sum of all IPQ held, individually or 
collectively, by that CDQ group.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-17607 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>