## NUMBER 13
- 14 - 00747 - CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRIST I
- EDINBURG

RAFAEL TREVINO , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

On appeal from the 379th District Court of Bexar County, Texas.



## ORDER ABATING APPEAL
Before Justice s Rodriguez , Garza and Longoria

Order Per Curiam During trial, appellant Rafael Trevino orally moved to suppress a statement he made to police officers before his arrest. He cited articles 38.22 and 38.23
of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure as a b asis for his motion to suppress and argued that the o fficer’s failure to read him his statutory rights negated the2

voluntariness of his statement. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN . arts. 38.22, .23 (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.). The trial court heard Trevino’s motion to suppress outside of the presence of the jury and subsequently denied the motion. No findings of fact or conclusions of law regarding the voluntariness of Trevino’s statement were entered by the trial court. Under article 38.22 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, i n all cases where a question is raised as to the voluntariness of a statement of an accused,
the trial court must enter an order stating whether or not the statement was voluntarily made, along with the specific finding of fact upon which the trial court’s
conclusion was based

. Vasquez v. State, 411 S.W.3d 918, 920 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (determining that there are no exceptions to article 38.22’s requirement that written findings are required in all cases concerning voluntariness). The
trial court’s fail ure to make specific factual findings regarding the voluntariness of Trevino’s statement require this Court to abate the appeal and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the voluntariness issue. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 38.22, § 6; Vasquez, 411 S.W.3d at 920; Douglas v. State, 900 S.W.2d 760, 762 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi 1995, pet. ref’d)

. W e AB A TE t h e a pp e a l , a n d REMAND t h e c a se to t h e trial c ou rt , and order the judge of the 379 th District Court of Bexar County to conduct a hearing in accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 38.22, section 6, to determine the voluntariness of any statement or confession made by appellant which was introduced
into evidence at trial . The hearing shall be co nducted within thirty days of the issuance3

of this order , or the trial court shall inform this C ourt within thirty days of the issuance of
this order of the hearing date. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 38.22, § 6; Douglas , 900 S.W.2d at 762

. It is further ordered that the judge of the 379 th District
Court thereafter : (1) prepare written findings of fact and conclusions of law in compliance with article 38.22, section 6 of the code of criminal procedure ; (2) cause them to be included in a supp lemental clerk’s record, (3) cause the hearing to be transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter’s record; (4) and forward the supplemental record to the Clerk of this Court within twenty days of the hearing. See
T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 38.22, § 6. Upon receipt of the supplemental record, this cause will be resubmitted for further consideration by the Court upon the original briefs fi led by the parties, unless prior permission for supplementation of the same is requested and granted

. IT IS S O ORDERED.

PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 5th day of Octo ber , 201 5

.