alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12


WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)



<TABLE>
                                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                     ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                         1996         1997         1998        1999         2000
                                     ----------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed Charges:
<S>                                       <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>
   Interest Cost                      $   103,338      136,929     145,579     129,282      124,296
   One-third rent                           6,906        7,535       8,075       8,076        8,868
                                      ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------
Total Fixed Charges                       110,244      144,464     153,654     137,358      133,164
                                      ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------

Add (Deduct):
   Earnings before
   Income Taxes                           306,086     111,263     132,783      413,275      514,387
   Interest Capitalized                   (10,534)    (19,939)    (13,589)      (3,998)      (5,163)
                                      ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------
Earnings for
Fixed Charges                         $   405,796     235,788     272,848      546,635      642,388
                                      ============ ============ =========== ============ ============

Ratio of Earnings to
   Fixed Charges                             3.68        1.63        1.78         3.98         4.82
                                             ====        ====        ====         ====         ====
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,166,974
<SECURITIES>                                76,752,281
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            83,433,362
<PP&E>                                       9,419,729
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,238,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,310,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,261,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       166,606
<OTHER-SE>                                  85,981,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                87,310,422
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               300,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,234,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,793,455)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,793,455)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,793,455)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of The Finish Line, Inc.
(the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended May 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78); and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: July 8, 2009                                                
|                                                                   
|/s/ Glenn S. Lyon                                                  
|Glenn S. Lyon Chief Executive
Officer                              
|                                                                   
|/s/ Edward W. Wilhelm                                              
|Edward W. Wilhelm Executive Vice-President, Chief
Financial Officer
Au5fi^j ""Tk^LA^ o^ ^•D.Vam OurskL FEB 23 i
^U. Ahet A^fiftfta, C?©fo. TWcVy-6 ^>^ hgfvAS EflUA_Appfc<iJi Ho. &W\'5^^O0JLP3'(^&_ FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS \-Wrtft CsaisV' f FEB 23 2Q15 Abel Acosta, Clerk VA^Vvr>M "T^ .^u^f-AJtd "Thg ^mUs 

### To TUc Hnu orAJol^ "T"^q^5 ^ The (%arffllO.rluiutl LpeAs '. 

### jor 4-kgL-Coud- fr> SuZpizM—the Te^s "RvtU ^H-lpp^Ak—P^ir.pAu^fcj KiuU 

### _j£L Jhs&—m/A-hoM jt> -Hie reQu'ireMfyfr sf-rlAfe nuuW?r rrf eopLB&Jio keMjedj

,^aA tW (ngQtj«maM^y-4-s o*f „?£rviikite a^pks ^u>c>ffrf-<g. Ba.-rgc.a4-)up fll-Urusvi /Mq

Qr Q, N//^ Dure^AD Wi±L&J±&£- _£fco_<2^-Z, Cer-tl-fkA-fe 0-fSBrsi)<LB> 

### OuspgttJ TW %Ae&j ]f\As beamJfars^krAeA fy U- 3. M%| 4r> UT <*«r4-i4L 44nU- Atyufc Aiid r.r>ir\r4=^^- c^pwgfr -Hie /j/yiyg /tfrd-pvrtftvtttia RoalTa—

Aa^m, Te^ 7g7)\ "£3ftft _6j^^Ls_tkg_\^^cW_<^ 

## igLia^ajQ.UiMii. 

### Ji^'vii/.ofe^_\jr-o_S&. .-tatfiooim—!^kbmtiis-Ar^bii£„AiMLc6zrjzcb.i
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE
BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1512
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                          410183
<DEPRECIATION>                                   82660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  426891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                         220503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        241741
<OTHER-SE>                                     (62117)<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    426891
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 53354
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13665<F4>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 15134<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               13414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  13616
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              13616
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78
<FN>
<F1>Amount insignificant.
<F2>Balance Sheet is not classified.
<F3>Amount represents accumulated dividends in excess of net income.
<F4>Amount comprised of Property Operating Costs (9,253) and Other Operating
Expenses (4,412).
<F5>Amount comprised of Depreciation expense (12,401) and General and
Administrative expense (2,733).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRECISION SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,135,603
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,389,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                   901,031
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,781,783
<PP&E>                                         35,501,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                 27,167,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,157,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,191,409
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    145
<COMMON>                                       179,743
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,452,646)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,157,855
<SALES>                                        2,328,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16,102,309
<CGS>                                          8,802,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,802,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,705,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             494,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,899,770)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,899,770)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,899,770)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.50)
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2285

GIEDAY BAHILU,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A75-363-095)

Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 25, 2004

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oti W. Nwosu, Arthur D. Wright, III, THE WRIGHT LAW NETWORK,

Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant

Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Senior Litigation Counsel, John

D. Williams, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gieday Bahilu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider its previous

order denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We

have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the

Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Bahilu’s motion to

reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003) (setting forth

standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review

on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Bahilu, No. A75-363-095

(B.I.A. Sept. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 32(b)**

**Certification of CFO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 30, 2007 of Wendy’s International, Inc. (the “Issuer”).

I, Joseph J. Fitzsimmons, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(i) the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. 

Dated: February 27, 2008 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wendy’sInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Wendy’s International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### COMPANIA MARITIMA TRANSOCEANICA, S. A., v. STEVENSON et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Dec. 29, 1950.

*211Frank W. Jackson, New York City, for plaintiff.

Dow & Symmers, New York City, for defendant Gratsos.

Foley & Statt, New York City, for all other defendants Milton James, New York City, of counsel.

RYAN, District Judge.

All five defendants move before answer to dismiss the complaint; they also seek a stay of further proceedings herein on the ground that plaintiff has not paid costs awarded in a prior action, which stated the same claims -here alleged.

Motion for stay:

The complaint in the present suit pleads claims identical to those alleged in a prior suit, which was dismissed on May 1, 1950, with costs awarded against plaintiff. These have not been paid. Two new defendants, T. J. Stevenson, Sr. and Jr., have been joined in this new'action. Motion for a stay is granted in favor of the three other named defendants. Rule 41(d), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A.

Motion to dismiss:

The claims now pleaded may be asserted in this action notwithstanding the dismissal of the former action. Such dismissal does not operate as an adjudication on the merits under Rule 41(b). Russo v. Sofia Bros., Inc., D.C., 2 F.R.D. 80.

The complaint is dismissed, however, as not being a simple, concise and direct statement of plaintiff’s claims. It is plaintiff’s apparent purpose to plead, in the first count, a breach of contract and, in the second count, injury as a result of the alleged tortious acts of defendants. This purpose is not fulfilled by a complaint which does not permit of proper answer. Leave is granted plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days from date hereof. Such complaint shall state (1) whether plaintiff sues on one or more contracts, (2) the date and place said contracts were made, (3) whether such contracts were oral or written; if oral, their substance and terms are to be pleaded in detail in separate paragraphs; if written, copies are to be set forth as part of the. complaint, (4) how, by whom and when it is claimed the terms of the alleged contracts were breached, (5) what allegedly tortious acts were committed by each defendant and the date of their commission, (6) the details of *212any and all fraudulent acts alleged to have been committed by each defendant.

There is no need for this complaint to run the gamut of the judges of this court, as did the complaint in the prior action, The amended complaint, if plaintiff elects to serve one and otherwise comply with the orders above made, shall be served upon defendants’ attorneys and then submitted to nie. The defendants shall have ten days after such service to file any memorandum of objections. These pending motions shall also be considered as addressed to the amended complaint, if one is served.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                         14,892
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               34,732
<PP&E>                                      1,610,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                 43,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,694,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         272,804
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    7,891,066
<OTHER-SE>                                    264,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,694,014
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 167,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             60,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (167,805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (167,805)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (167,805)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)





</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-QSB AT MARCH  31,2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         57,798
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,222,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                   108,570
<INVENTORY>                                    9,042,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,228,795
<PP&E>                                         12,714,761
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,863,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 30,996,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,091,125
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,317
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,357,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   30,996,063
<SALES>                                        5,821,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,821,715
<CGS>                                          4,777,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,777,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             483,093
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,105,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,105,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,105,319)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.86)


</TABLE>
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-21-00268-CV 

 

JASON PAUL WHITE, DDS, APPELLANT 

V. 

JANE DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF JOHN DOE, A MINOR 

CHILD, AND JOHN DOE II, AS NEXT FRIEND OF MINOR CHILDREN, JOHN DOE III 

AND JOHN DOE IV, APPELLEES 

On Appeal from the 99th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2021-542,885, Honorable J. Phillip Hays, Presiding 

November 15, 2021 

ORDER 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

On November 5, 2021, this Court denied appellant’s emergency motion to suspend 

receivership pending appeal. On November 9, appellant filed a second emergency 

motion for relief, again requesting that we stay the trial court’s order appointing a receiver

and further requesting that we issue a temporary injunction blocking the receiver from 

selling real property or transferring funds.
2

Appellant maintains that he is entitled to supersede the trial court’s order pursuant 

to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24.1(a). While a judgment debtor is generally 

entitled to supersede a judgment and thus defer its enforcement while pursuing an 

appeal, see TEX. R. APP. P. 24.1; Miga v. Jensen, 299 S.W.3d 98, 100 (Tex. 2009), 

appellant has not indicated that he has sought relief from the trial court via any of the four 

methods listed in Rule 24.1(a). As such, there is no supersedeas ruling presented for our 

review.

Further, when seeking temporary orders in an appeal of an interlocutory order, it 

is the movant’s burden to make a clear showing that he is entitled to relief. Lamar 

Builders, Inc. v. Guardian Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 786 S.W.2d 789, 791 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[1st Dist.] 1990, no writ) (order). To be entitled to injunctive relief, appellant must plead 

and prove (1) the existence of a wrongful act, (2) a probable right to the relief sought, and 

(3) the likelihood of imminent and irreparable injury. Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 

S.W.3d 198, 204 (Tex. 2002). Appellant has not presented sufficient evidence to 

demonstrate that the receivership presents a danger justifying emergency or injunctive

relief. Appellant’s assertions about potential harm resulting from “pending transactions” 

do not inform the Court as to the property involved, its value, the projected sales date, or 

any imminent and irreparable injury that might result. 

Thus, we conclude that the motion is insufficient to support granting appellant’s 

request for a stay or issuing an injunction. Appellant’s motion is therefore denied.

Per Curiam