Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 155 / Monday, August 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules 37829 

• NASS Dairy Products Prices: How 

Does That Work?; and 

• NASS Survey Cheddar Cheese Price 

Data (May 23, 1997; June 27, 1997; 

August 1, 1997; September 5, 1997; 

October 10, 1997; December 19, 1997; 

December 29, 1997; January 23, 1998; 

February 20, 1998; March 20, 1998; 

April 24, 1998; May 29, 1998; June 26, 

1998; July 31, 1998; August 28, 1998; 

and October 2, 1998). 

USDA Office of the Chief Economist 

Publication 

• Drought Monitor: Percentage of 

crops and livestock located in drought, 

March 2016. 

Federal Government Resources 

• Census Bureau data on Upper 

Midwest FMMO, Market Area 

Population; 

• Energy Information Administration 

Weekly Retail Gasoline and Diesel 

Prices, January 2011–July 2015; 

• Federal Highway Administration 

Highway Statistics Summary to 1995; 

and 

• Federal Highway Administration 

Highway Statistics, Annual Issues, 

1995–2012. 

Federal Register Publications 

• 3 FR 1945–1949 regarding the 

handling of milk in the New York 

Metropolitan Marketing Area, August 

1938; 

• 26 FR 7134–7141 regarding 

amendments to the Chicago marketing 

order, August 1961; 

• 27 FR 799–816 regarding 

amendments to pricing of milk reserves 

and excess reserves, January 1962; 

• 31 FR 7062 regarding a Puget 

Sound, Washington, market area 

expansion and amendments to 

producer-handler definition, May 1966; 

• 39 FR 11567–11571 regarding a 

partial decision on emergency measures 

to suspend butter powder prices, March 

1974; 

• 44 FR 48128–48130 regarding a 

decision to not promulgate an order in 

the Southwestern Idaho-Eastern Oregon 

marketing area, August 1979; 

• 50 FR 32716, 32718–32719 

regarding a decision to expand two 

marketing areas and revise location 

differentials in the Middle Atlantic and 

New York-New Jersey areas, August 

1985; 

• 52 FR 15951–15960 regarding 

termination of proceedings on proposed 

amendments to the Georgia and certain 

other marketing areas, May 1987; 

• 53 FR 686–731 regarding the merger 

of two marketing areas in the Great 

Basin and Lake Mead marketing areas, 

January 1988; 

• 53 FR 36321–36334 regarding a 

final decision to provide partial credits 

to handlers hauling surplus milk in the 

Texas marketing area, September 1988; 

• 55 FR 25618–25669 regarding 

promulgation of a Carolina FMMO, June 

1990; 

• 56 FR 57850–57864 regarding a 

decision to adopt multiple component 

pricing for the Mid-Atlantic FMMO, 

November 1991; 

• 58 FR 58112–58137 regarding 

amendments to the New England and 

Certain Other Marketing Areas, October 

1993; 

• 59 FR 8546–8565 regarding 

amendments to the Pacific Northwest 

and Southwestern Idaho-Eastern Oregon 

Marketing Areas, February 1994; 

• 60 FR 7290–7333 regarding 

amendments to the New England and 

Other Marketing Areas, February 1995; 

• 60 FR 25014–25071 regarding 

amendments to the Georgia and Certain 

Other Marketing Areas, May 1995; 

• 60 FR 41833–41868 regarding 

amendments to the Chicago Regional 

and Other Marketing Areas, August 

1995; 

• 60 FR 43066–43089 regarding 

amendments to the Southern Michigan 

Marketing Area, August 1995; 

• 64 Fed Reg. 70868–70912 regarding 

amendments to the New England and 

Other Marketing Areas, December 1999; 

• 65 FR 76832–76861 regarding 

amendments to the Northeast and Other 

Marketing Areas, December 2000; 

• 70 FR 74166, 7418 regarding a final 

decision on amendments to the Pacific 

Northwest and Arizona-Las Vegas 

Marketing Areas, December 2005; 

• 71 FR 67467–67495 regarding 

amendments to the Northeast and Other 

Marketing Areas, November 2006; 

• 73 FR 11194–11229 regarding 

amendments to the Appalachian, 

Florida, and Southeast Marketing Areas, 

February 2008; 

• 73 FR 35306–35331 regarding 

amendments to the Northeast and Other 

Marketing Areas, June 2008; 

• 75 FR 33534–33533 regarding 

amendments to the Northeast and Other 

Marketing Areas, June 2010; and 

• 78 FR 9248 regarding a final 

decision to adopt changes to the make 

allowances and butterfat yield factor in 

Class III and IV price formulas, February 

2013. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–608. 

Dated: August 8, 2017. 

Bruce Summers, 

Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17100 Filed 8–11–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0150; FRL–9965–91– 

Region 1] 

Air Plan Approval; Connecticut; 

Nonattainment New Source Review 

Permit Requirements for the 2008 8- 

Hour Ozone Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

the state implementation plan (SIP) 

revision submitted on March 9, 2017, by 

the State of Connecticut, through the 

Connecticut Department of Energy and 

Environmental Protection (CT DEEP), 

addressing the nonattainment new 

source review (NNSR) requirements for 

the 2008 8-hour ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). The SIP revision addresses 

both of Connecticut’s ozone 

nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone 

NAAQS; the Greater Connecticut area 

and the Connecticut portion of the New 

York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJCT area. The Connecticut portion of the 

New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, 

NY-NJ-CT ozone nonattainment area 

consists of Fairfield, New Haven, and 

Middlesex counties. The Greater 

Connecticut nonattainment area 

includes the rest of the State. This 

action is being taken pursuant to the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and its 

implementing regulations. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before September 13, 

2017. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– 

OAR–2017–0150 at https://

www.regulations.gov, or via email to 

dahl.donald@epa.gov. For comments 

submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Once submitted, comments 

cannot be edited or removed from 

Regulations.gov. For either manner of 

submission, the EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
37830 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 155 / Monday, August 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

For the full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Donald Dahl, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, EPA New England 

Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem 

Protection, Air Permits, Toxics, and 

Indoor Programs Unit, 5 Post Office 

Square—Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05– 

2), Boston, MA 02109–3912. Mr. Dahl’s 

telephone number is (617) 918–1657; 

email address: dahl.donald@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Final Rules Section of this issue of the 

Federal Register, EPA is approving the 

State’s SIP submittal as a direct final 

rule without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this action rule, 

no further activity is contemplated. If 

EPA receives adverse comments, the 

direct final rule will be withdrawn and 

all public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. 

For additional information, see the 

direct final rule which is located in the 

Rules Section of this issue of the 

Federal Register. 

Dated: July 24, 2017. 

Deborah A. Szaro, 

Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New 

England. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17022 Filed 8–11–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 64 

[CG Docket No. 17–169; FCC 17–91] 

Protecting Consumers From 

Unauthorized Carrier Changes and 

Related Unauthorized Charges 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

Commission proposes to amend its rules 

to prohibit carriers from 

misrepresenting themselves when 

placing telemarketing sales calls to 

consumers and placing unauthorized 

charges on their phone bills. The 

Commission seeks comment on ways to 

strengthen its rules to protect consumers 

from slamming and cramming and 

proposes to codify a rule prohibiting 

misrepresentations on carrier 

telemarketing calls to consumers that 

often precede a carrier switch, and 

proposes to codify a rule against 

cramming. The intended effect of this 

action is to prevent unscrupulous 

carriers from targeting vulnerable 

populations from committing fraud 

either on sales calls or when ‘‘verifying’’ 

a consumer switch. 

DATES: Comments are due on or before 

September 13, 2017, and reply 

comments are due on or before October 

13, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by CG Docket No. 17–169 

and/or FCC Number 17–91, by any of 

the following methods: 

• Electronic Filers: Comments may be 

filed electronically using the Internet by 

accessing the Commission’s Electronic 

Comment Filing System (ECFS), through 

the Commission’s Web site: http://

apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Filers should follow 

the instructions provided on the Web 

site for submitting comments. For ECFS 

filers, in completing the transmittal 

screen, filers should include their full 

name, U.S. Postal service mailing 

address, and CG Docket No. 17–169. 

• Mail: Parties who choose to file by 

paper must file an original and one copy 

of each filing. Filings can be sent by 

hand or messenger delivery, by 

commercial overnight courier, or by 

first-class or overnight U.S. Postal 

Service mail (although the Commission 

continues to experience delays in 

receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All 

filings must be addressed to the 

Commission’s Secretary, Office of the 

Secretary, Federal Communications 

Commission. 

For detailed instructions for 

submitting comments and additional 

information on the rulemaking process, 

see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section of this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kimberly A. Wild, Consumer Policy 

Division, Consumer and Governmental 

Affairs Bureau (CGB), at (202) 418–1324, 

email: Kimberly.Wild@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s Rules 

and Policies Protecting Consumers from 

Unauthorized Carrier Changes and 

Related Unauthorized Charges, Notice 

of Proposed Rulemaking, document FCC 

17–91, adopted on July 13, 2017, 

released on July 14, 2017. The full text 

of document FCC 17–91 will be 

available for public inspection and 

copying via ECFS, and during regular 

business hours at the FCC Reference 

Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th 

Street SW., Room CY–A257, 

Washington, DC 20554. A copy of 

document FCC 17–91 and any 

subsequently filed documents in this 

matter may also be found by searching 

ECFS at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/ (insert 

CG Docket No. 17–169 into the 

Proceeding block). 

Pursuant to 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, 

interested parties may file comments 

and reply comments on or before the 

dates indicated on the first page of this 

document. Comments may be filed 

using ECFS. See Electronic Filing of 

Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 

63 FR 24121 (1998). 

• All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the 

Commission’s Secretary must be 

delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 

12th Street SW., Room TW–A325, 

Washington, DC 20554. All hand 

deliveries must be held together with 

rubber bands or fasteners. Any 

envelopes must be disposed of before 

entering the building. 

• Commercial Mail sent by overnight 

mail (other than U.S. Postal Service 

Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be 

sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, 

Capitol Heights, MD 20743. 

• U.S. Postal Service first-class, 

Express, and Priority mail should be 

addressed to 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

Pursuant to § 1.1200 of the 

Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.1200, this 

matter shall be treated as a ‘‘permit-butdisclose’’ proceeding in accordance 

with the Commission’s ex parte rules. 

Persons making oral ex parte 

presentations are reminded that 

memoranda summarizing the 

presentations must contain summaries 

of the substances of the presentations 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS