alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibits**

 

**Exhibit 4.24**

 

David Weaver Esq 

Butlers 

Tower Hill 

Horsham 

West Sussex 

RH13 0AQ 

 

9 April 2004 

 

Dear David 

 

I write to confirm the agreement which we have reached regarding the change to the date upon which you will take up your employment as Chief Executive Officer pursuant to theService Agreement dated 30 March 2004 (“Agreement”). 

 

We have agreed that yourEmployment (as defined in the Agreement) which was due to have commenced on 8 April 2004 will now take effect from the date (the “Commencement Date”) immediately following the date upon which the filing of the Group Accounts with the USSecurities and Exchange Commission, in accordance with applicable US law and regulation, is made. “Group Accounts” for this purpose shall mean the Annual Report and 20F of the Company and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) for thefinancial year ended 31 December 2003 including the consolidated financial statements of the Group for that year set out therein. 

 

Accordingly it is agreed that clauses 2.1, 4.4 and 5.9 of the Agreement be amended by substituting for the date of 8 April 2004 where it appears in those clauses the words“the Commencement Date”. In addition in clauses 4.4 and 5.9 of the Agreement the reference to 5 May 2004 shall be changed to 6 May 2004, being the revised date for the holding of the requisitioned Extraordinary General Meeting of theCompany to be held that day. Save as expressly varied by this letter the Agreement will remain in full force and effect. 

 

I will be grateful if you would confirm your acceptance of the terms set out in this letter by signing and returning the attached copy letter. 

 

Yours sincerely, 

 

 

Chairman 

Baltimore Technologies Plc 

 

 

I have read this letter and accept the terms detailed above. 

 

 

Signature: 

 

Date: 

 

Name:
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37305-37306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17915]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

July 22, 2009.
    The Department of Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, and 1750

[[Page 37306]]

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before August 27, 2009 
to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1545.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: REG-107644-97 (Final) Permitted Elimination of Preretirement 
Optional Forms of Benefit (TD 8769).
    Description: The regulation permits an amendment to a qualified 
plan that eliminates certain preretirement optional forms of benefit.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 48,800 hours.
    Clearance Officer: R. Joseph Durbala, (202) 622-3634, Internal 
Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, (202) 395-7873, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

Celina Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-17915 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF STARR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on June 3, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or

reverse your judgment between

Marco Antonio Hernandez, Appellant

V.

Lisa Hernandez, Appellee

No. 04-15-00246-CV and Tr. Ct. No. CC-10-03

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

We order that appellee Lisa Hernandez recover her costs of this appeal, if

any, from appellant Marco Antonio Hernandez.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on August 13, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-15-00246-CV

Marco Antonio Hernandez

v.

Lisa Hernandez

(NO. CC-10-03 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF STARR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

FILING $195.00 NOT PAID N/A

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: $195.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this August 13, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.A CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2003, of Colorado Interstate Gas Company (the Company) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John W. Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ John W. Somerhalder IIJohn W. Somerhalder IIChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 29, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Colorado Interstate Gas Company and will be retained by Colorado
Interstate Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND
FOR THE PERIODS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                      11,513,026
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,900,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,312,086
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,996,388
<PP&E>                                       1,526,591
<DEPRECIATION>                               (924,163)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,829,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,190,045
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,563
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,847,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                84,829,373
<SALES>                                     26,570,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,327,322
<CGS>                                       25,112,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,328,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,022,611
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,200,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,822,611
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,822,611
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
        

</TABLE>
#### BOWLES v. WOLFE.

Civ. A. No. 3993.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

April 23, 1945.

John A. Metz, Jr. and Robert Bruce Greer, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

*369A. Grant Walker and Gunnison, Fish, Gifford & Chapin, all of Erie, Pa., for defendant.

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This is an action under the Emergency-Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, and as further amended by the Stabilization Act of 1944, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix §§ 901 et seq., 963 et seq., and involving Revised Maximum Price Regulation No. 165 (9 Fed. Reg. 7439), which provides in Section 14 thereof that a person in a service business, including repair of automobiles, shall prepare a statement of maximum prices and file a duplicate thereof with the appropriate War Price and Rationing Board. In the instant case is such Board located at Erie, Pennsylvania.

The complaint alleges that defendant has been selling services in regard to automobile services, but has neglected to prepare such statement and file a duplicate thereof with the appropriate Board; i. e., the Board at Erie, Pennsylvania. The complaint asks a mandatory injunction requiring defendant to file such statement with the Board at Erie, and restraining him from violating Maximum Price Regulation No. 165.

Defendant denies he has failed to prepare such statement, and avers to the best of his knowledge and belief that he did file it with the Board at Erie, but is unable to prove that he did so.

Plaintiff has moved for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

Under these circumstances, we are of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment with a mandatory injunction requiring defendant to file such statement with the Board at Erie, Pennsylvania, within five days from the entry of the decree herein. The denial of defendant to the best of his knowledge and belief is not sufficient. If he prepared such statement, as alleged in his answer, it will be no trouble for him to prepare and file a duplicate with the Board. If he did file such duplicate with the Board, he certainly can state positively when he filed it. That he has failed to do.

The plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. An order may be submitted accordingly on notice to counsel for defendant.
Order entered August 4, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00640-CR

STEPHANIE BELJANA LIMAURO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-82584-2020

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the motion of Maria 

Tu to withdraw as counsel for appellant. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to 

remove Maria Tu as counsel of record for appellant.

We ORDER the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in 

this appeal and to transmit a supplemental clerk’s record containing the order 

appointing new counsel to this Court within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this 

order. Appellate counsel shall review the record and file a brief addressing any 
issues noted in the opinion in this case as well as any other grounds that might 

arguably support the appeal within FORTY DAYS of the date of counsel’s 

appointment. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send copies of this order to the 

Honorable Andrea Thompson, Presiding Judge, 416th District Court; Destiny M. 

Moses, court reporter, 416th District Court; John R. Rolater, Collin County District 

Attorney’s Office; and appellant Stephanie Limauro, TDCJ No. 02355092, Lane 

Murray Unit, 1916 North Highway 36 Bypass, Gatesville, TX 76596.

We ABATE this appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. 

The appeal shall be reinstated when the order appointing new counsel is received 

or the Court deems it appropriate to do so.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
IV 

House Calendar No. 71

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 293

[Report No. 108–175] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2555) making appropriations 

for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending 

September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2003

Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2555) making 

appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security 

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for 

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 2555) making appropriations for 
2

HRES 293 RH 

1 the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year 

2 ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. The 

3 first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points 

4 of order against consideration of the bill are waived. Gen5 eral debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not ex6 ceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair7 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

8 Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be con9 sidered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points 

10 of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply 

11 with section 501 of House Concurrent Resolution 95 and 

12 clause 2 of rule XXI are waived except as follows: sections 

13 514, 521, and 522. During consideration of the bill for 

14 amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 

15 may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether 

16 the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be 

17 printed in the portion of the Congressional Record des18 ignated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amend19 ments so printed shall be considered as read. At the con20 clusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

21 Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

22 such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 

23 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

24 amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
3

HRES 293 RH 

1 motion except one motion to recommit with or without in2 structions. 
House Calendar No. 71

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 293

[Report No. 108–175] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2555) 

making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. 

JUNE 23, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
#### Hayes *v.*Bickelhoupt, Sr.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

August 25, 1884.

1. Patents Tfoit Inventions — Reissues 8,674, 8,675 — Sky-Lights and Ventilators.

The eighth claim of reissued patent No. 8,674, and the first, second, and seventh claims of reissued patent No. 8,07.6, for improvements on sky-lights and ventilators, are not to he found in the original patent, and are void.

2. Same—Reissue 8,689—Validity—Infringement.

The second and third claims of reissued patent No. 8,689, for sky-lights and ventilators, are not anticipated by any prior patents or structures, are valid, and are infringed by defendant.

In Equity.

*J. H. Whitelegge,*for orator.

*A. v. Briesen,*for defendant.

*568Wheeler, J.

This suit is brought upon reissued patents Nos. 8,597, 8,674, 8,675, 8,688, and 8,689, granted to the orator for improvements in sky-lights and ventilators. They have been before the circuit court for the Eastern district of New York, (Judge Benedict,) and some of them before this court, (Judge Coxe,) and all the claims alleged here to be infringed have been adjudged to be void, except the eighth of 8,674, the first, second, and seventh of 8,675, and the •second and third of 8,689. *Hayes*v. *Seton,*12 Fed. Rep. 120; *Hayes*v. *Dayton,*20 Fed. Rep. 690. Of these, the eighth of 8,674, and the first, second, and seventh of 8,675, are not to be found in the original patents, but were added after the patents had stood nearly nine years without them, and are void for the reason given in these former cases as to other claims, which are concurred in and followed. There are left the second and third claims of 8,689. These claims in the reissue appear to be the same as in the original. They are not shown to be anticipated by any prior patents or structures, and no good reason is apparent for adjudging them to be invalid.- The third is for a sash swinging on pivots, having exterior and overlapping elastic flanges on the sides and bottom of the part of the sash swinging outward, forming an outer flashing for protection against storms. The alleged infringement appears to have such a flange at the bottom. In *Hayes*v. *Seton*there appears to have been no such flange on any part of the sash. There, no infringement of this claim was found; here, there appears to be an infringement to the extent of the use of this flange at the bottom of the sash.

The second appears to be infringed by the use of the combination of flanged covering strips in combination with hollow metallic posts for supporting glasses, as described in that claim. The orator appears to be entitled to a decree as to these two claims of this patent, and the defendant as to the residue of the claims in controversy ;■ but, as neither prevails fully, without costs to either.

Let there be a decree for the orator for an injunction and account as to the second and third claims of No. 8,689, accordingly, without costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 447 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 447

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 2015

   Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Whitehouse, and Mrs. 
    Murray) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jury Access for Capable Citizens and 
Equality in Service Selection Act of 2015'' or the ``Jury ACCESS Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM FEDERAL JURIES ON ACCOUNT OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION 
              OR GENDER IDENTITY PROHIBITED.

    Section 1862 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``sexual orientation, gender identity,'' after ``sex,''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 70 

To direct the General Accountability Office to conduct a full audit of hurricane protection funding and cost estimates associated with post-Katrina 

hurricane protection. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2015 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the General Accountability Office to conduct a 

full audit of hurricane protection funding and cost estimates associated with post-Katrina hurricane protection. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUDIT OF HURRICANE PROTECTION FUNDING 

4 AND COST ESTIMATES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, the Government Account7 ability Office, in coordination with the National Academy 

8 of Engineering, shall conduct and submit to Congress a 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 70 IS

1 full audit of hurricane protection funding and cost esti2 mates associated with post-Katrina hurricane protection. 

3 (b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of the audit shall be— 

4 (1) to identify the causes for the extraordinary 

5 miscalculations in cost estimates of damage caused 

6 by Hurricane Katrina that were completed before 

7 the date of enactment of this Act; 

8 (2) to conduct an analysis of resources available 

9 and work required with respect to hurricane protec10 tion funding and post-Katrina hurricane protection; 

11 and 

12 (3) to identify strategies to replenish repro13 grammed funding from out-year work to immediate 

14 needs. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
 GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Under
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  November 6, 2009
    /s/ GREGORY B. KENNYGregory B. KennyChief Executive OfficerDate:  November 6, 2009
    /s/ BRIAN J. ROBINSONBrian J. RobinsonChief Financial Officer   54