alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES CONTAINED IN FORM 10K AS
FILED HEREWITH, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,704           
<SECURITIES>                                    23,658           
<RECEIVABLES>                                      719           
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0       
<INVENTORY>                                        601           
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0       
<PP&E>                                             333           
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,929           
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0       
<BONDS>                                          1,062           
<COMMON>                                             7           
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0       
<PREFERRED>                                          0       
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,210           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,929           
<SALES>                                          2,756           
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,740           
<CGS>                                            1,707           
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,644           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  59           
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,009           
<INCOME-TAX>                                       270           
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                725           
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0       
<CHANGES>                                            0       
<NET-INCOME>                                       725           
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      611
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      611
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17716]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10093]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: ``Teotihuacan: City of Water, City of 
Fire'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Teotihuacan: City of Water, City of Fire,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement 
with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Fine Arts Museums 
of San Francisco, de Young Museum, San Francisco, California, from on 
or about September 30, 2017, until on or about February 11, 2018, at 
the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, California, from on 
or about March 25, 2018, until on or about July 15, 2018, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the 
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1d2c4c2d5c8cecf93959498e1d2d5c0d5c48fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="493a2c2a3d2026277b7d7c70093a3d283d2c672e263f">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. Department 
of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of 
December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

Alyson Grunder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-17716 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 555 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards for information on the 

kidnapping and murder of James Foley, Peter Kassig, Steven Sotloff, 

Kayla Mueller, or any other United States citizen by a foreign terrorist 

organization. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2015 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. NELSON, Mr. COATS, Mr. 

MCCAIN, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. CRUZ, and Ms. AYOTTE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards for information on the kidnapping and murder of James Foley, 

Peter Kassig, Steven Sotloff, Kayla Mueller, or any other 

United States citizen by a foreign terrorist organization. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bringing Terrorists 

5 to Justice Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 555 IS

1 SEC. 2. REWARDS AUTHORIZED. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Rewards 

3 for Justice program authorized under section 36(b) of the 

4 State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 

5 U.S.C. 2708(b)), the Secretary of State shall offer a re6 ward to any individual who furnishes information leading 

7 to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual 

8 for committing, conspiring or attempting to commit, or 

9 aiding or abetting in the commission of— 

10 (1) the kidnapping and murder of James Foley, 

11 Peter Kassig, Steven Sotloff, or Kayla Mueller; or 

12 (2) the kidnapping and murder, on or after the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act, of any other cit14 izen of the United States by a foreign terrorist orga15 nization. 

16 (b) LIMITATIONS.— 

17 (1) AFFILIATES OF FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGA18 NIZATIONS.—The Secretary of State shall not offer 

19 a reward under subsection (a) in connection with the 

20 kidnapping and murder of a citizen of the United 

21 States described in subsection (a)(2) who the Sec22 retary of State determines was affiliated with or 

23 supportive of a foreign terrorist organization. 

24 (2) TOTAL AWARDS FOR AN INDIVIDUAL.—The 

25 total amount of rewards offered under subsection (a) 

26 in connection with the kidnapping and murder of 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 555 IS

1 any one of the individuals named in such subsection 

2 or any other citizen of the United States described 

3 in such subsection may not exceed $5,000,000. 

4 (c) FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.—The term 

5 ‘‘foreign terrorist organization’’ means an organization 

6 designated by the Secretary of State as a foreign terrorist 

7 organization in accordance with section 219 of the Immi8 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 3, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50084 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE JIAMON ZELAYA-PARADA, also known as Jose Jaime Zelaya-Parada, also known as Jose Jaime Zelaya, also known as Jose Jaime Parada Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-1713-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Zelaya-Parada appeals his guilty-plea conviction of, and sentence for, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by being found in the United States without permission after deportation. Zelaya-Parada argues, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), that the 31-month term of imprisonment imposed in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the § 1326(a) offense charged in his indictment. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felonyNo. 06-50084 -2- and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. Zelaya-Parada’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although he contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Zelaya-Parada properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Zelaya-Parada also argues that his guilty plea is not valid because (1) the district court failed to give him full and correct information regarding the maximum statutory penalty that he would face for the offense and (2) the factual basis for his plea was insufficient to establish that he was “found in” the United States. Zelaya-Parada’s first argument is premised on the unconstitutionality of § 1326. However, the Supreme Court has held that § 1326 is constitutional. Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 246. As to the second argument, Zelaya-Parada has not shown plain error. See United States v. Vonn , 535 U.S. 55, 1054-55 2002; United States v. Pacheco-Medina , 212 F.3d 1162, 1163-64 (9th Cir. 2000). As the Government seeks to enforce Zelaya-Parada's waiver of sentencing issues and the waiver is valid, we do not addressNo. 06-50084 -3- those issues. See United States v. Story , 439 F.3d 226, 230-31 (5th Cir. 2006).
AFFIRMED.
No. 1206.

#### Audett *v.*United States.

June 10, 1946.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General McGrath, Robert S. Erdahl*and *Leon Ulman*for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Woodhead Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 27, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philippe Lemaitre, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| | BY: /s/ Philippe Lemaitre                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                          
| | Philippe LemaitreChief Executive OfficerDecember 17, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

59

---
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D2 3- 1874 LT Case No. 2022

- CA

- 48424

_____________________________ C HAIM J OSEPH B IALOSTOZKY A/K/A J OSEPH B IALOSTOZKY A/K/A Y OSEPH B IALOSTOZKY , Appellant,

v. GAHC3 M OUNT D ORA FL M OB II , LLC, Appellee.

_____________________________
Nonfinal appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Michelle L. Naberhaus, Judge. Megan Fonzalez, of Annesser Armenteros, PLLC, Miami, for Appellant. Paul A. Humbert, of Law Offices of Paul A. Humbert, P.L., Miami, for Appellee. January 30, 2024

P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED
. M AKAR , W ALLIS , and S OUD , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,909,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,288,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,197,000
<PP&E>                                      26,979,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,176,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,158,000
<BONDS>                                     29,982,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,025,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,176,000
<SALES>                                      5,870,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        1,960,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,298,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             976,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                636,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    50,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            586,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   586,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                         EXHIBIT 22 TO FORM 10-K
                                                     WESCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                                FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997


                          WESCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                PERCENTAGE
                                                OWNED BY          STATE OF
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                              REGISTRANT        INCORPORATION
------------------                              ----------        -------------
<S>                                             <C>               <C>
Wesco Holdings Midwest, Inc. . . . . . . . . .     100%           Nebraska
  Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc.  . . . . . .     100%           Illinois
    Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc.
      Charlotte Service Center . . . . . . . .     100%           Delaware
    Precision Brand Products . . . . . . . . .     100%           Delaware
  Wesco-Financial Insurance Company  . . . . .     100%           Nebraska
    Kansas Bankers Surety Company  . . . . . .     100%           Kansas
MS Property Company  . . . . . . . . . . . . .     100%           California
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wisconsin Electric Power Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Gale E. Klappa, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/GALE E. KLAPPA
Exhibit 10.5

(B.C. ZIEGLER AND COMPANY LOGO)

                                                    INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

DATE:      May 5, 1999

TO:        Gary Engle

FROM:      Peter Ziegler

SUBJECT:   Memo of Understanding - Severance


This memo reflects our mutual understanding relative to severance payment to you
in the event of change of control of The Ziegler Companies, Inc. (ZCO).  Change
of control is defined as a change in the majority of the Board of Directors of
ZCO or ownership of more than 50% of the common stock of ZCO.

In the event of change in control and your employment is terminated by ZCO or
its successor, within two years of the date of that event, you will be entitled
to a severance payment equal to one year's salary at your then current rate.  If
termination occurs in the third or fourth years after change in control, you
will be entitled to a severance payment equal to 50% of one year's salary at
your then current rate.  Severance will be paid in cash and will become due
within 60 days of termination of employment.

The above described severance arrangement will terminate 7 years following
initiation of employment (4/20/99).
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2023 ND 236

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Wesley Wayne Serdahl, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20230204

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial 

District, the Honorable Todd L. Cresap, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Tiffany M. Sorgen, Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, N.D., for plaintiff and 

appellee; submitted on brief.

Thomas J. Burckhard, Minot, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on 

brief.
1

State v. Serdahl

No. 20230204

Per Curiam.

Wesley Wayne Serdahl appeals from a criminal judgment entered after 

a jury convicted him of terrorizing. He argues the conviction is not supported 

by sufficient evidence. “In reviewing challenges to the sufficiency of the 

evidence on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing the evidence 

reveals no reasonable inference of guilt when viewed in the light most 

favorable to the verdict.” State v. Grant, 2023 ND 62, ¶ 18, 988 N.W.2d 563 

(cleaned up). After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence 

supports the conviction. We summarily affirm the judgment under 

N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte

Douglas A. Bahr
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 2-83778, Form S-8 No. 33-48211, Form S-8 No. 333-04905 and Form
S-8 No. 333-67743) pertaining to the National Technical Systems, Inc.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan, the National Technical Systems, Inc. 1988
Stock Option Plan, the National Technical Systems, Inc. 1994 Stock Option
Plan and the XXCAL, Inc. Stock Option Plan and in the related Prospectuses of
our report dated April 13, 2001, except for item (b) of Note 3, as to which
the date is April 24, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of National Technical Systems, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2001.

                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Woodland Hills, California
April 27, 2001