alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



AEROSONIC CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aerosonic Corporation (the Company) for the period ending January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 6, 2004 and as amended on April 28, 2004 (the Report), I, David A. Baldini, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



April 28, 2004







/s/   DAVID A. BALDINI



David A. Baldini

Chief Executive Officer

---

Exhibit 32.2



AEROSONIC CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aerosonic Corporation (the Company) for the period ending January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 6, 2004 and as amended on April 28, 2004 (the Report), I, Gary E. Colbert, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



April 28, 2004









/s/   GARY E. COLBERT



Gary E. Colbert

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      788,226
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    198,006
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         129,707
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        14,267
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  11,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,141,993
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            199,672<F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           607,009
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   29,535
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 305,300
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,141,993
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      168,227
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     139,842
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     139,842
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         28,385
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,834
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  31,219
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        25,983
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,236
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       25,992
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          42,887
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Old Dominion is organized and operated as a cooperative. Patronage capital is
the retained net margins of Old Dominon which have been allocated to its members
based on their respective power purchases in accordance with Old Dominion's
bylaws.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 290 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 290

  Expressing appreciation to the people and Government of Canada for 
 their long history of friendship and cooperation with the people and 
    Government of the United States and congratulating Canada as it 
                       celebrates ``Canada Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2003

 Mr. Stupak (for himself, Mr. Nethercutt, Mr. Pomeroy, and Mr. Quinn) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                       on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing appreciation to the people and Government of Canada for 
 their long history of friendship and cooperation with the people and 
    Government of the United States and congratulating Canada as it 
                       celebrates ``Canada Day''.

Whereas the United States has a long-cherished economic, social, and political 
        partnership with Canada;
Whereas the United States and Canada share not only a 5,500 mile border, but 
        also common ideals and cultural affinities;
Whereas in this era of heightened security, the United States and Canada have 
        renewed cooperative efforts to safeguard the movement of people and 
        goods, improve information-sharing, and strengthen border infrastructure 
        and technology; and
Whereas July 1st of each year is officially celebrated in Canada as ``Canada 
        Day'' in recognition of the anniversary of the establishment of the 
        union of the British North American provinces in a federation called 
        Canada: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its appreciation to the people and Government 
        of Canada for their long history of friendship and cooperation 
        with the people and Government of the United States; and
            (2) congratulates Canada as it celebrates its annual 
        ``Canada Day''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Terrence Leroy WRIGHT, a/k/a Terrence Wright El, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Butch JACKSON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 12-7480.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 12, 2012.

Decided: Jan. 3, 2013.

Terrence Leroy Wright, Appellant Pro Se.

Before AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*340PER CURIAM:

Terrence Leroy Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of ap-pealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wright has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Wright’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**STATSURE      DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.**

**June      30, 2006**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. for                the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and                Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A                of                StatSure Diagnostic Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006                fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and                results of operations of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                                             |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/                Leo Ehrlich                                   |
|        |   |   | Leo                EhrlichChief                Financial Officer |
|        |   |   | (principal financial officer and duly authorized officer)   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 155 (Monday, August 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 37854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17092]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Number: PR17-55-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: COH Rates effective 
7-31-2017 to be effective 7/31/2017; Filing Type: 980.
    Filed Date: 8/2/17.
    Accession Number: 201708025059.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-960-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits tariff filing 
per 154.204: Negotiated Rates--Eco-Energy 8946929 to be effective 8/2/
2017 under RP17-960 Filing Type: 570.
    Filed Date: 08/02/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170802-5091.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated August 3, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17092 Filed 8-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                              NATURAL WONDERS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE NET LOSS
                              (Shares in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Quarter Ended
                                         ----------------------------------------
                                           May 1, 1999             May 2, 1998
                                         ------------------      ----------------
<S>                                      <C>                   <C>
Net loss                                       $(4,359)             $(4,576)
                                           --------------        ----------------
Weighted average common shares
       Outstanding, basic and diluted            7,951                8,072

Per share net loss, basic and diluted          $ (0.55)             $ (0.57)
                                           -------------         ----------------
                                           -------------         ----------------
</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/Lee Roy MitchellLee Roy MitchellChief Executive Officer
  /s/ Carol WaldmanName: Carol WaldmanTitle: Notary Public
 06/07/08
exv10w3wdwiv








EXHIBIT 10.3.d.iv




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





     This Amendment to Employment Agreement is hereby entered into as of September 18, 2008 by and
among Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), Cedar Shopping
Centers Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”) and Nancy Mozzachio
(the “Executive”).



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, the Corporation, the Partnership and the Executive entered into that certain
Employment Agreement dated as of November 1, 2003, as presently in effect (the “Employment
Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation (on the Corporation’s own behalf, and as
the sole general partner of the Partnership) approved the modification to certain provisions of the
Employment Agreement;



     NOW THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound the parties hereto agree as follows:



     1. Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:




     “2.1 The term of employment shall end October 31, 2009, unless sooner terminated as
provided in this Agreement.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the
date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ LEO S. ULLMAN, President
 	 
	 
	 
	 	CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
 	 
	 	By:  	Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.
 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ NANCY MOZZACHIO
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	Nancy Mozzachio
Exhibit 10.14

AMENDMENT NO. 2  TO  ZENITH NATIONAL INSURANCE CORP.  1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN

ZENITH NATIONAL INSURANCE CORP. (the "Company") hereby amends the 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") with reference to the following facts:



Now,
therefore, Section 3 of the Plan is hereby further amended by increasing the total number of shares of Common Stock reserved and available for grant pursuant to new awards
under the Plan by an additional 250,000 shares, so that an aggregate of 2,676,000 shares are reserved for issuance under the Plan.

In Witness Whereof, the Company has executed this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan as of this 24th day of May 2001.

| |  | ZENITH NATIONAL INSURANCE CORP.
| |  | -------------------------------
| |  | By:                            

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17737]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[CERCLA-04-2017-3758; FRL-9966-03-Region 4]


Former Douglas Battery Site, Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North 
Carolina; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement with 
Victor Kung, Pearl Pacific Properties LLC and East Best LLC concerning 
the Former Douglas Battery Site located in Winston-Salem, Forsyth 
County, North Carolina. The settlement addresses recovery of CERCLA 
costs for a cleanup action performed by the EPA at the Site.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
October 23, 2017. The Agency will consider all comments received and 
may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments 
received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the 
proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from the Agency by 
contacting Ms. Paula V. Painter, Program Analyst, using the contact 
information provided in this notice. Comments may also be submitted by 
referencing the Site's name through one of the following methods: 
Internet: https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-epa-region-4-southeast#r4-public-notices.
    <bullet> U.S. Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund 
Division, Attn: Paula V. Painter, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303.
    <bullet> Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7626171f18021304582617031a173613061758111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="411120282f3524336f1120342d20012431206f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at (404) 562-8887.

    Dated: July 7, 2017.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Enforcement and Community Engagement Branch, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-17737 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 1090.

#### Carothers, doing business as Allright Auto Park, et al. *v.*Bowles, Price Administrator.

June 3, 1946.

*Walter F. Brown*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General McGrath, John R. Benney*and *Milton Klein*for respondent.

Porter substituted as the party respondent. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is denied.
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 24, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10977

 

AMERISTAR JET CHARTER, INC.,

Plaintiff - Appellee - Cross Appellant,

versus

SIGNAL COMPOSITES, INC., Etc.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

SUSANNE STEHR, 

Defendant - Appellant - Cross Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas

3:01-CV-64-M

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Susanne Stehr appeals from the district court’s judgment finding her liable to Ameristar Jet

Charter, Inc. for conspiracy to commit fraud and finding her jointly and severally liable to Ameristar

for $432,099.60 in compensatory damages. Ameristar cross-appeals the damages award. After

reviewing the pleadings and hearing oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the district court for
2

the following reasons:

1. The pretrial order provided adequate notice to Stehr of Ameristar’s claim for

conspiracy to commit fraud. See Thrift v. Hubbard, 44 F.3d 348, 356 (5th Cir. 1995)

(“Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a pleading, or pretrial order, need not

specify in exact detail every possible theory of recovery--it must only ‘give the

defendant fair notice of what the plaintiff's claim is and the grounds upon which it

rests.’”) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)).

2. The district court did not clearly err in concluding that Durrani acted in a dual

capacity on behalf of Signal Composites, Inc. d/b/a Signal Aerospace (“Signal”) and

Aerospace Logistics. See FED. R. CIV. P. 52(a). The district court’s finding is

supported by evidence in the record that Durrani worked for Signal as a business

consultant and that he was paid consulting fees through Aerospace Logistics.

3. There was sufficient evidence presented at trial for the district court to reasonably

conclude that Stehr knowingly participated in the conspiracy to commit fraud. The

district court’s finding is not clearly erroneous. See id.

4. The district court did not clearly err in awarding damages. The district court’s

calculation of benefit-of-the-bargain damages is plausible in light of conflicting

evidence in the record as to the value of the liners as represented. See St. Martin v.

Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S. Inc., 224 F.3d 402, 410 (5th Cir. 2000).

For these reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court. 

AFFIRMED.