alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38708-38709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17161]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 23, 2017, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Medical Technology Enterprise 
Consortium (``MTEC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Appili Theraputics, Inc., Halifax, Nova Scotia, CANADA; 
BioTime, Inc., Alameda, CA; Chenega Healthcare Services, LLC, San 
Antonio, TX; Critical Innovations LLC, Venice, CA; Embody LLC, Norfolk, 
VA; Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS; NovaHep AB, Gothenburg, 
SWEDEN; Pulmotect, Inc., Houston, TX; QBiotics Limited, Taringa, 
Queensland, AUSTRALIA; SIMETRI, Inc., Winter Park, FL; SpherIngenics, 
Inc., Richmond, VA; Spherium Biomed SL, Barcelona, SPAIN; Techulon, 
Inc., Blacksburg, VA; The Trustees of Columbia University in the City 
of New York, New York, NY; The University of Texas Health Science 
Center at Houston, Houston, TX; UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; 
and Vapogenix, Inc., Houston, TX, have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    Also, MedPro Technologies, Inc., San Antonio, TX; MetArmor, Inc., 
Glen Gardner, NJ; Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI; and 
Organovo, Inc., San Diego, CA, have withdrawn as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and MTEC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 9, 2014, MTEC filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 9, 
2014 (79 FR 32999).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 19, 
2017. A notice was published in the Federal

[[Page 38709]]

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 12, 2017 (82 FR 
22159).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-17161 Filed 8-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angelique M. Murtaugh, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 879]

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon a jury verdict of two counts each of forgery in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.10 [1]) and petit larceny (§ 155.25), defendant challenges the sufficiency of the factual allegations supporting the forgery counts in the indictment *(see*CPL 200.50 [7]). Defendant failed to preserve that challenge for our review *(see People v lannone,*45 NY2d 589, 600 [1978]; *People v Soto,*44 NY2d 683, 684 [1978]), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *1243
      *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Present—Smith, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Green, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Under Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
year ended June 29, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bennett L. Nussbaum
|Bennett L. Nussbaum    
|                       
|October 25, 2005
No. 1223.

#### Loomis *v.*United States et al.

June 10, 1946.

*Homer L. Loomis, pro se.*

*Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General Sonnett, Paul A. Sweeney, David Schwartz*and *Raoul Berger*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EX-10.46






EXHIBIT 10.46




EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR JONATHAN P. RICH,

AMENDMENT NO. 1




               This Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement for JONATHAN P. RICH (“Amendment No. 1”) is
made, effective as of February 23, 2009, by and among WELLCARE HEALTH PLANS, INC., a Delaware
corporation (“WellCare”), COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC., a Florida corporation (the
“Corporation”), and JONATHAN P. RICH, an individual (“Executive”), with respect to the following
facts and circumstances:



RECITALS




          WHEREAS, Executive, WellCare and the Corporation previously entered into an Employment
Agreement on July 3, 2008, (the “Employment Agreement”); and




          WHEREAS, Executive, WellCare and the Corporation desire to further amend the Employment
Agreement regarding the payment of an expense allowance.




Agreement:




          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements contained herein and of such other good and
valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which Executive acknowledges, WellCare, the Corporation
and Executive, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:




               1. The last sentence of Section 1.4 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read as
follows:




Commencing on February 1, 2009 and continuing during the Term, Executive shall receive an
allowance of $1,800 per month for expenses incurred in connection with travel between
Ridgefield, Connecticut and Tampa, Florida (the “Travel Allowance”). The Travel Allowance shall
be reviewed by Compensation Committee no less frequently than every six months and may be
increased or decreased from its then-existing level at the discretion of Compensation Committee.



               2. The provisions of this Amendment No. 1 may be amended and waived only with the prior
written consent of the parties hereto. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed and delivered in one
or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and together shall constitute one
and the same instrument.



               3. Except as set forth in this Amendment No. 1, the Employment Agreement shall remain
unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect.



 









 





          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment No. 1 on the
date first written above.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	WELLCARE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	WELLCARE HEALTH PLANS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Heath Schiesser	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name: Heath Schiesser	 	 
	 	 	Title: President & CEO	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Heath Schiesser	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name: Heath Schiesser	 	 
	 	 	Title: President & CEO:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EXECUTIVE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Jonathan P. Rich	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	JONATHAN P. RICH	 	 






 2
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Ipswich Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael J. Wolnik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"). In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32),
this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B)
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.


/s/ Michael J. Wolnik
---------------------------
Michael J. Wolnik
Chief Financial Officer

July 22, 2005
<TABLE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 21





                           Subsidiaries of the Registrant


<CAPTION>
                                                          Status as of
             Name                    Incorporation     December 31,1996
---------------------------------    -------------     ----------------
<S>                                 <C>                <C>
Wisconsin Public Service
  Corporation (1)                      Wisconsin          Active

WPS Leasing, Inc. (2)                  Wisconsin          Active

WPS Energy Services, Inc. (1)          Wisconsin          Active

WPS Power Development, Inc. (1)        Wisconsin          Active

WPS Visions, Inc. (1)                  Wisconsin          Active

PDI Stoneman Operations, Inc. (3)      Wisconsin          Active

PDI Stoneman, Inc. (3)                 Wisconsin          Active

LB Mid-American, Inc. (4)              Wisconsin          Active

----------------


(1)  Wholly-owned subsidiary of WPS Resources Corporation.
     
(2)  WPS Leasing, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wisconsin  
       Public Service Corporation.

(3)  PDI Stoneman Operations, Inc. and PDI Stoneman, Inc. are
     wholly-owned subsidiaries of WPS Power Development, Inc.    

(4)  Wholly-owned subsidiary of PDI Stoneman, Inc.
</TABLE>

                                           -113-

<PAGE>
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0426 

JESUS VILLANUEVA, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Respondent and Appellee. 

ORDER 

Appellant Jesus Villanueva has filed a motion for a 90-day extension of time to file 

his opening brief. He has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel. 

Having considered and denied Villaneuva's motion for appointment of counsel 

twice previously, we decline to consider it again. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant has until January 30, 2024, to file his 

opening brief. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel is 

DENIED. 

DATED this-C-3 day of October, 2023. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice 

10/23/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0426
#### In the Matter of Angel Figueroa, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 443]

Following a search of his cell, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of a weapon, possession of money and possession of contraband. At the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty to possession of contraband insofar as the charge pertained to a radio and a translator for which he did not have a permit. He pleaded not guilty to the remaining charges. At the conclusion thereof, the Hearing Officer found petitioner guilty of all charges and a penalty was imposed. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination.

Petitioner contends that the determination of guilt is not supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. We cannot agree. Preliminarily, petitioner’s plea of guilty to possession of contraband forecloses his challenge to that part of the determination sustaining that charge *(see Matter of Spencer v Goord,*38 AD3d 1028 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 802 [2007]). As to the remaining charges, the testimony of the correction officer who conducted the search was sufficient to demonstrate the presence of razor-like weapons and a $50 bill secreted in the false bottom of a thermos that, according to the correction officer, petitioner admitted was his. Moreover, the fact that the thermos was located in an area over which petitioner had control supports the inference that it belonged to him *(see Matter of Ameen v Selsky,*25 AD3d 1059 [2006]). To the extent that petitioner denied ownership or possession of the thermos, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Carter v Goord,*45 AD3d 1077 [2007]). Finally, even accepting petitioner’s claim that the Hearing Officer failed to independently assess the reliability and credibility of the confidential information provided, the record contains independent evidence *1060to sustain the determination *(compare Matter of Holmes v Senkowski,*238 AD2d 629, 630 [1997] [testimony and misbehavior report based solely upon confidential information]). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb it.

Spain, J.P., Lahtinen, Kane, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENT  OF THE COMPANY AS OF  SEPTEMBER  30, 2000  INCLUDED IN THE
10QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10QSB
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000886093
<NAME>                          VIKING CAPITAL GROUP, INC

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                    6323
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           101329
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        107652
<PP&E>                                                  952177
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (230118)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          914739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  1871823
<BONDS>                                                   1703
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                 35919
<OTHER-SE>                                             (994706)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            914739
<SALES>                                                  15666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         35248
<CGS>                                                    13366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1202557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         (4415)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      (21707)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (1206797)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (1206797)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (1206797)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (.036)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.036)



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Arizona Gold and Onyx Mining Company f/k/a Viking Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, Dick Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

May 8, 2018

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# SNR12
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3490 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3490

 To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide for an option 
    under the Secure Mail Initiative under which a person to whom a 
  document is sent under that initiative may require that the United 
 States Postal Service obtain a signature from that person in order to 
             deliver the document, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 1, 2016

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Perdue, and Mrs. Gillibrand) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
             on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide for an option 
    under the Secure Mail Initiative under which a person to whom a 
  document is sent under that initiative may require that the United 
 States Postal Service obtain a signature from that person in order to 
             deliver the document, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening the Department of 
Homeland Security Secure Mail Initiative Act''.

SEC. 2. OPTION FOR SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT UNDER THE SECURE MAIL 
              INITIATIVE.

    (a) In General.--Beginning not later than 1 year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
provide for an option under the Secure Mail Initiative (or any 
successor program) under which a person to whom a document is sent 
under that initiative may require that the United States Postal Service 
obtain a signature from that person in order to deliver the document.
    (b) Fee.--The Secretary shall require the payment of a fee from a 
person requiring a signature under subsection (a). Such fee may be set 
at a level that will ensure recovery of the full costs of providing all 
such services. Such fee may also be set at a level that will recover 
any additional costs associated with the administration of the fees 
collected.

SEC. 3. REPORT.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to Congress a report 
which includes--
            (1) the implementation of the requirements under section 2;
            (2) the fee imposed under section 2(b); and
            (3) the number of times during the previous year that a 
        person required a signature under section 2(a).
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.10









EXHIBIT 10.10




ASTRONICS CORPORATION

First Amendment of the Astronics Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan




FIRST AMENDMENT

of the

ASTRONICS CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN




          Under the Astronics Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), Astronics
Corporation (the “Corporation”) reserved the right to amend the Plan. The Corporation wishes to
amend the Plan to reflect certain changes to its terms, and to comply with the written plan
requirements of the final regulations issued under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.




          The Corporation hereby amends the Plan in the following respects:





	 	1.	 	Article IV is amended by the addition of the following at
the end thereof:






Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan to the contrary,
benefits will distributable upon a Participant’s separation from service
with the Company on account of the death, retirement, or other
termination of employment determined consistent with the provisions of
Section 409A of the Code (a “Separation”) and will commence as soon as
practicable on or after the later of the Separation or the date the
Participant’s would attain age 60. If a benefit is payable solely
because a Participant who is a “specified employee”, within the meaning
of Section 409A of the Code, has “separated from service”, within the
meaning of Section 409A of the Code, no benefits will be paid prior to
the date that is six months after the date of separation from service
(or, if earlier, the date of death of the Participant). Payments to
which a Participant would otherwise be entitled during the first six
months following the date of separation from service will be accumulated
and paid on the day that is six months after the date of separation from
service. For this purpose, a benefit payable will be paid as the amount
calculated at the time of separation from service (without adjustment
for delay in payment).



          Unless otherwise indicated, the effective date of this First Amendment is January 1, 2005. In
all other respects, the Plan remains unchanged.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ASTRONICS CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	January 1, 2005

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	Date

	 	 	 	 

Kevin T. Keane,
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Chairman of the Board