alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [CERCLA-04-2017-3758; FRL-9966-03-Region 4]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of settlement.

# SUMMARY:

Under 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement with Victor Kung, Pearl Pacific Properties LLC and East Best LLC concerning the Former Douglas Battery Site located in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina. The settlement addresses recovery of CERCLA costs for a cleanup action performed by the EPA at the Site.

# DATES:

The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until October 23, 2017. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Copies of the settlement are available from the Agency by contacting Ms. Paula V. Painter, Program Analyst, using the contact information provided in this notice. Comments may also be submitted by referencing the Site's name through one of the following methods: Internet:                         *https://www.epa.gov/​aboutepa/​about-epa-region-4-southeast#r4-public-notices.*
      -  U.S. Mail:                          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund Division, Attn: Paula V. Painter, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303.                    
      - Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paula V. Painter at (404) 562-8887.

Dated: July 7, 2017.

Anita L. Davis,

Chief, Enforcement and Community Engagement Branch, Superfund Division.

[FR Doc. 2017-17737 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 Date: June 8, 2010
    
    /s/ R. Daniel Brdar

R. Daniel BrdarChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

IGNACIO VALLES-BARRIOS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10096

D.C. No. 2:13-cr-01469-GMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted September 23, 2014***

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Ignacio Valles-Barrios appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 40-month sentence for reentry after

FILED

OCT 02 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The Honorable Howard D. McKibben, Senior United States District

Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), Valles-Barrios’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Valles-Barrios the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro

se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Valles-Barrios has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss

the appeal. See id. at 988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2 14-10096
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3513 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to facilitate communication 

between U.S. Customs and Border Protection and border ranchers in 

Arizona and other border States and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2016 

Mr. FLAKE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to facilitate 

communication between U.S. Customs and Border Protection and border ranchers in Arizona and other border 

States and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Border Landowner and 

5 Lessee Consultation Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3513 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONSULTATION WITH BORDER RANCHERS. 

2 (a) REQUIREMENT TO CONSULT.—Section 411(c) of 

3 the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 211(c)) is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (17), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

6 end; 

7 (2) in paragraph (18), by striking the period at 

8 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(19) consult with any person who owns or 

11 leases real property where the United States Border 

12 Patrol operates and receive input from such persons 

13 related to U.S. Customs and Border Protection op14 erations that affect such real property.’’. 

15 (b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 90 days after the 

16 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commissioner of 

17 U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall propose regula18 tions to carry out paragraph (19) of section 411(c) the 

19 Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 211(c)), as 

20 added by subsection (a). 

21 SEC. 3. PRIVATE LANDOWNER OMBUDSMAN. 

22 Subsection (d) of section 411 of the Homeland Secu23 rity Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 211(d)) is amended to read 

24 as follows: 

25 ‘‘(d) DEPUTY COMMISSIONER; PRIVATE LANDOWNER

26 OMBUDSMAN.— 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3513 IS

1 ‘‘(1) DEPUTY COMMISSIONER.—There shall be 

2 in U.S. Customs and Border Protection a Deputy 

3 Commissioner who shall assist the Commissioner in 

4 the management of U.S. Customs and Border Pro5 tection. 

6 ‘‘(2) PRIVATE LANDOWNER OMBUDSMAN.— 

7 There shall be in U.S. Customs and Border Protec8 tion a Private Landowner Ombudsman who shall as9 sist persons who own real property along the inter10 national border between the United States and Mex11 ico in communicating to the Commissioner the needs 

12 and interests of such persons related to U.S. Cus13 toms and Border Protection operations that affect 

14 such real property.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

PHILLIP A. PEAVY, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

LABOR SOURCE, LLC, d/b/a One Source 

ABM Industrial Incorporated, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

No. 18-3085 

(D.C. No. 2:15-CV-02633-JAR-TJJ) 

(D. Kan.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________ 

Before BRISCOE, MATHESON, and EID, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

 On August 3, 2015, the district court entered judgment dismissing Phillip Peavy’s 

pro se employment discrimination suit against Labor Source, LLC. On October 27, 2015, 

we affirmed the dismissal. Peavy v. Labor Source, LLC, 620 F. App’x 676 (10th Cir. 

2015). Our mandate issued on December 21, 2015. 

On December 6, 2016, the district court denied Mr. Peavy’s motion to recall the 

mandate because it lacked jurisdiction to do so. It also denied his request to proceed 

 *

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined 

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of 

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore 

ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding 

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral 

estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with 

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

June 26, 2018

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
2 

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) because there was no basis to do so. On 

March 8, 2017, we affirmed. Peavy v. Labor Source, LLC, 678 F. App’x 780 (10th Cir. 

2017). Our mandate issued on March 30, 2017. 

On March 23, 2018, the district court denied Mr. Peavy’s motion captioned 

“Collateral Attack,” through which he appeared to challenge the district court’s August 3, 

2015 judgment and our March 8, 2017 order and judgment. The district court denied the 

motion, again saying it lacked jurisdiction to recall our court’s mandate and finding no 

basis for Rule 60(b) relief. Mr. Peavy appeals from this post-judgment order. 

We liberally construe a pro se litigant’s filings, see Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 

89, 94 (2007) (per curiam). Though Mr. Peavy’s brief is difficult to follow, we have 

carefully reviewed it. Although it appears to challenge the district court record, the 

magistrate judge’s role, the district court’s August 3, 2015 judgment, and the district 

court’s reliance on this court’s March 8, 2017 order and judgment to deny the “Collateral 

Attack” motion, these and other references are not sufficiently clear or adequately 

briefed. 

Mr. Peavy has not presented an argument grounded in fact or law that would 

permit us to reverse the district court. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we 

therefore affirm. 

Entered for the Court 

Scott M. Matheson, Jr. 

Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of NATIONAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William McGinnis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.
 Dated: May 2, 2011/s/ William McGinnisWilliam McGinnisChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 21: SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      State or other Jurisdiction
Name of Subsidiary                        in which organized           Ownership
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aero-Motive Company                          State of Michigan           100%
AI/FOCS, Inc.                                State of Delaware           100%
Akapp Electro Industrie B.V.                 The Netherlands             100%
Central Rubber Company                       State of Illinois           100%
Daniel Woodhead Company                      State of Delaware           100%
DW Holding, L.L.C.                           State of Delaware           100%
mPm S.r.l.                                   Italy                       100%
W.I.S. Corp.                                 U.S. Virgin Islands         100%
Woodhead Asia Pte. Ltd.                      Singapore                   100%
Woodhead Canada Limited                      Province of Nova Scotia     100%
Woodhead Connectivity GmbH                   Germany                     100%
Woodhead Connectivity Limited                United Kingdom              100%
Woodhead Connectivity S.A.                   France                      100%
Woodhead de Mexico S.A. de C.V.              Mexico                      100%
Woodhead Finance Company                     Province of Nova Scotia     100%
Woodhead France S.A.R.L                      France                      100%
Woodhead Industries (The Netherlands) B.V.   The Netherlands             100%
Woodhead Japan Corporation                   Japan                       100%
Woodhead L.P.                                State of Texas              100%





                                                                              14
Abatement Order filed July 3, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00767-CR

____________

CURTIS ELL WHITE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 183rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1372505

ABATEMENT ORDER

The trial court failed to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law on the 

voluntariness of appellant’s statement. Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code 

of Criminal Procedure requires the trial court to make written fact findings and 

conclusions of law as to whether a challenged statement was made voluntarily, 

even if appellant did not request them or object to their absence. Tex. Code Crim. 

Proc. Ann. art. 38.22 ' 6; Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2004). The statute is mandatory and the proper procedure to correct the error is to 
abate the appeal and direct the trial court to make the required findings and 

conclusions. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1987). 

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of 

fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this 

Court on or before August 4, 2014.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, INC.
            333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California  90071
                            Telephone  (213) 486-9200


                                             January 5, 2005



Document Control
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

 Re: CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, Inc.
     File Nos.  811-5085
                2-12967

Ladies/Gentlemen:

     Pursuant to Rule 497(j), I hereby certify that no changes have been made to
the forms of  prospectuses  and Statements of Additional  Information  since the
electronic  filing on 12/30/04 of Registrant's  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 23
under the  Securities  Act of 1933 and  Amendment  No.  25 under the  Investment
Company Act of 1940.

                                             Sincerely,



                                             /s/ Vincent P. Corti
                                             Vincent P. Corti
                                             Secretary



cc:   Laura Hatch
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17676]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP17-967-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits tariff filing 
per 154.203: JntStlmtExtAgmt, Dkt<greek-i>s RP88-67, 88-81, 88-221, 90-
119, 91-4, 17-964.
    Filed Date: 08/09/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170809-5117.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 16, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-968-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Northern Natural Gas Company submits tariff filing per 
154.204: 20170810 Carlton Flow Obligations to be effective 11/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 08/10/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170810-5047.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 22, 2017.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or 
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests 
may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to 
the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 10, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17676 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
SATURNA INVESTMENT TRUST

POWER OFATTORNEY

 

The undersigned Trustees of Saturna Investment Trust, a MassachusettsBusiness Trust organized under the laws of the State of Washington, proposing tofile with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, one or more amendments to the Registration Statement on FormN-1A and related Amendments to the Registration Statement of the Trust under theInvestment Company Act of 1940 ("Amendments") do hereby separately and severallyappoint and constitute Nicholas F. Kaiser, whose signature appears below:

/s/ Nicholas F. Kaiser

Nicholas F. Kaiser

his true and lawful attorney for him and in his name, place and stead to signin the capacity of a Trustee of the Trust such Amendments and any and alladditional amendments thereto, and to file such amendments and all instrumentsnecessary or incidental thereto with the Securities and Exchange Commissionunder such 1933 and 1940 Acts.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand and seal this14th day of December, 2004.

 

/s/ A. Herbert Ershig	

A. Herbet Ershig			

 

/s/ Gary A. Goldfogel 	

Gary A. Goldfogel					 

			

 

/s/ John E. Love		

John E. Love

 

/s/ John S. Moore		

John S. Moore
*The AAL Mutual Funds*

A N N U A L
<PAGE>   1



                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.10a



            MODIFIED LIST OF PARTIES TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT



The following agreements are substantially identical to the Form of Change of
Control Agreement shown here, except for the names and therefore are not filed
as separate documents in accordance with Exchange Act rule 12b-31.

Form of Change of Control Agreement dated as of October 30, 1996 between Zale
Corporation (the "Company"), and the following "Key Employees":

1)        Thomas A. Carroll
2)        David W. Howard
3)        Gregory Humenesky
4)        Mark R. Lenz
5)        Stephen C. Massanelli
6)        Gary W. Melton
7)        Ervin G. Polze
exv10w33






EXHIBIT 10.33




[ON ORBITZ WORLDWIDE LETTERHEAD]




March 3, 2009




James Shaughnessy

c/o Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.

500 West Madison Street, Suite 1000

Chicago, IL 60661




Dear Jim,



The following will confirm our understanding with respect to the housing and travel allowances
payable to you in connection with your employment by Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. and its affiliates (the
“Company”).



Effective as of August 1, 2008 and for the succeeding 12-month period, you will receive a housing
allowance of $5,700 per month (or $2,630.77 per pay period), less applicable taxes, and will have
use of available Company barter card funds for air travel to and from your home in Connecticut on a
weekly basis. In addition, you will be reimbursed for ground transportation expenses incurred in
connection with such air travel. In the event that barter card funds cannot be used (for example,
for change fees or fare increases incurred to change an itinerary for a business reason) or are no
longer available, you will be reimbursed for the actual cost of such fees and fare changes or the
actual cost of an airline ticket to and from your home in Connecticut consistent with Company
travel policies. Any such reimbursements will be subject to applicable taxes. With respect to any
reimbursements included in your W-2 taxable income, excluding the housing allowance, you will be
entitled to a “tax gross up” payment at the end of each calendar quarter with respect to
reimbursements paid during such calendar quarter to offset the additional tax liability you may
incur in connection with receiving such reimbursements and gross up payment.



The aforementioned allowances and benefits are in lieu of any other relocation benefits during the
relevant period. At the end of this period, the Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors
(or appropriate committee thereof) will review either a continued housing/travel allowance or begin
the relocation process under the Company’s Relocation Policy, Plan A.



The above terms shall amend and supersede any prior agreements or arrangements between you and the
Company (including any of its predecessors) with respect to the subject matter hereof.



Please indicate your acceptance of this agreement by signing below and returning it to me.




Regards,




/s/ Kristin Dickey




Kristin Dickey

Director, Human Resources

Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.




	 	 	 
	/s/ James P. Shaughnessy
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	Employee

	 	Date