alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Roemer *v.*Neumann.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

March 29, 1885.)

Patents for Inventions—'Violation of Injunction—Suit for Infringement.

Where a def endent lias infringed a patent after the granting of an injunction in a suit by tlie patentee, the fact that the patentee might, if lie chose, proceed against him for contempt, in violating the injunction awarded in the former suit, will not affect his right to sue for such infringement.

In Equity.

*Briesen & Steele,*for complainants.

*Betts, Atterbury & Betts,*for defendant.

Wallace, J.

The infringement of complainant’s patent by the defendants, since the interlocutory decree in the suit between the samo parties in the district of New Jersey,1 creates a how cause of action *448in favor of complainant, and lie can proceed at law or in equity to enforce it. His right to do this is not impaired by the circumstance that he can also, if he chooses, proceed against defendants for contempt in violating the injunction awarded him by the decree in the former suit. The plea of another suit pending is bad.

1

 19 Fed. Her. 98.
**SATURNA INVESTMENT TRUST  AMANA MUTUAL FUNDS TRUST**

**Proposed Resolution**

**Resolved**, that the proposed Fidelity Bond coverage under the  Investment Company Blanket Bond of ICI Mutual Insurance Company, to expire on  December 15, 2008, under which the Trust, Saturna Capital Corporation, Saturna  Brokerage Services, Inc. and Amana Mutual Funds Trust are joint insureds, be,  and hereby is, determined to be reasonable in amount in view of all the circumstances  and with consideration including, but not limited to, (i) the number of other  parties named as insureds, (ii) the nature of the business activities of such  other parties, (iii) the amount of the joint insured bond, (iv) the amount of  the premium for such bond, (v) the ratable allocation of the premium among all  parties named as insureds, (vi) the extent to which the share of the premium  allocated to the Trust is less than the premium the Trust would have had to  pay if it had provided and maintained a single insured bond, (vii) the value  of the anticipated aggregate assets of the Trust to which any covered persons  have access; (viii) peer fund coverages; and (ix) the nature of the securities  to be held in the portfolios of the Trust; and be it**Further Resolved**, that the proposed D&O/E&O Insurance  of ICI Mutual Insurance Company, to expire December 15, 2008, under which the  Trust, Saturna Capital Corporation, Saturna Brokerage Services, Inc. and Amana  Mutual Funds Trust are joint insureds, be, and hereby is, determined to be reasonable  and of benefit to the shareowners of the Trust; and be it**Further Resolved**, that pro-rata allocation of the premiums  for the Fidelity Bond and D&O/E&O Insurance provided by ICI Mutual Insurance  Company among each of the portfolios of the Trust is approved; and be it**Further Resolved**, that participation by the Trust in the joint  liability insurance policies is in the best interest of each of the portfolios  of the Trust; and be it**Further Resolved**, that the participation by the Trust in the  joint Fidelity Bond and D&O/E&O Insurance are fair and reasonable pro-rata  to each of the portfolios of the Trust; and be it**Further Resolved**, that the benefits of continuing a joint fidelity  bond from the ICI Mutual Insurance Company, including the opportunity to obtain  stable low-cost insurance coverage from ICI Mutual, justify maintaining reserve  premiums and making commitments for additional payments, including acceptance  of restrictions upon the withdrawal of reserve premiums.**Further Resolved**, that the Secretary of the Trust is appointed  as the officer responsible to file executed fidelity bonds annually as required  by Rule 17g-1(h) of the Investment Company Act, including a copy of the executed  joint insured bond and a resolution by the majority of the disinterested trustees  approving the amount, type, form and coverage of the bond and the portion of  the premium to be paid by each insured company.
**REPORT of****REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC    ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Shareowners and Board of Trustees        Idaho Tax-Exempt Fund:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of            the Idaho Tax-Exempt Fund, a series of shares of the Saturna Investment            Trust, including the schedules of investments as of November 30,            2005, and the related statements of operations for the year then            ended, the changes in net assets for each of the two years in the            period then ended, and the financial highlights for the five years            in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial            highlights are the responsibility of the Trust’s management.            Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements            and financial highlights based on our audits. 

We            conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public            Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards            require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance            about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are            free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an            audit of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting.            Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial            reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate            in the circumstances, but no for the purposes of expressing an opinion            on the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial            reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes            examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures            in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation            of securities owned as of November 30, 2005, by correspondence with            the custodian and broker. Our audit also includes assessing the accounting            principles used and significant estimates made by management, as            well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.            We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion the financial statements and financial highlights            referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial            position of Idaho Tax-Exempt Fund as of November 30, 2005, the results            of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in net assets            for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial            highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in            conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United            States of America.

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania        January 3, 2006p>
 /s/ signature    Tait, Weller & Baker
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      33,424,919
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         396,396
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               350,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                140,213,809
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     103,525,974
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       104,117,000
<LOANS>                                    709,864,261
<ALLOWANCE>                                 10,958,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,027,207,926
<DEPOSITS>                                 852,346,358
<SHORT-TERM>                                46,525,754
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                 24,949,939
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    60,829,923
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,811,920
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,027,207,926
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             32,149,904
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            7,225,786
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               189,976
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            39,565,666
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          16,765,335
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,134,333
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       21,665,998
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,330,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (27,309)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             14,151,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,286,035
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  12,286,035
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,751,035
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,121,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 3,712,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             9,715,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  784,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   697,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           10,959,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        10,959,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 22

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 8, 2003.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

they are hereby, elected to the following standing committees

of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Stenholm of Texas.

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Obey of Wisconsin.

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Skelton of Missouri.

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Spratt of South

Carolina.

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr.

George Miller of California.

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Dingell

of Michigan.

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Frank of

Massachusetts.

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Waxman of

California.
2

•HRES 22 EH

COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: Mr. Lantos of California.

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Conyers of Michigan.

COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES: Mr. Rahall of West Virginia

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Hall of Texas.

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Ms. Vela ́zquez of

New York.

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Oberstar of Minnesota.

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Evans of Illinois.

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS: Mr. Rangel of New

York.

Attest:

Clerk.
ex10-4_1.htm








Exhibit 10.4.1












Second Amendment to the


Farmington Bank


Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan


For Directors

















The Farmington Bank Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (formerly named the Farmington Savings Bank Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors and Key Employees), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2007 and further amended effective January 1, 2010 (the “Plan”), is amended effective January 1, 2013 as follows:







1.   Section 2.18 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:







“2.18. “Plan Interest Rate” shall mean effective January 1, 2010, with respect to any Participant who has not retired or otherwise terminated employment before January 1, 2010, eight percent (8%), to be credited on a monthly basis. The Plan Interest Rate for voluntary contributions that are made on or after January 1, 2013 shall be a rate of interest, set annually in December to be effective for the subsequent calendar year, equal to the five-year Bank Certificate of Deposit yield for such month of December, to be credited on a monthly basis.”


 







                The authorized officers of Farmington Bank and First Connecticut Bancorp have caused this instrument of amendment to be executed this 20th day of December, 2013.


 


 



	 	
Farmington Bank


	 	 
	 	
By /s/ Lee D. Nordstrom


	 	 
	 	
Its SVP Human Resources


	 	 
	 	First Connecticut Bancorp
	 	 
	 	
By /s/ Gregory A. White


	 	 
	 	
Its Chief Financi al Officer
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO. 

### 2021 KW 1623 KIM R. HOGAN 

### MARCH 28, 

### 2022 In Re: Kinn R. Hogan, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 

### 22nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

## Tammany, No. 387, 357. BEFORE: MCDONALD, 

### LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. JMM 

### WIL EFT



### COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEP CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT 0
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7868 

GEORGE L. SPENCER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAUL WILLIAMS, Dr.; VICKI PHIPPS, RNCB/DON; F.

TAYLOR, Grievance Coordinator; R. MULLINS,

Grievance Coordinator; TRACY S. RAY, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (CA-05-627-7)

Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 6, 2006

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George L. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

George L. Spencer appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)

(2000), his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), for failure

to state a claim and the court’s order denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Spencer v. Williams, No. CA-05-627-7 (W.D.

Va. Oct. 19, 2005; Nov. 2, 2005). We deny Spencer’s motion to

appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LENARD DEVON JENKINS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-2896

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 25, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Daniel Muller, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jonathan S. Tannen, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE 

SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.
No. 1186.

#### Dure, Trustee, et al. *v.*Glazebrook et al.

May 27, 1946.

*James H. Price*for petitioners.

*Leonard D. Adkins, W. R. C. Cocke*and *Harold J. Gallagher*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
No. 947.

No. 948.

#### Pearson, Post Commanding Officer, *v.*United States ex rel. Horowitz; and Pearson, Post Commanding Officer, *v.*United States ex rel. Samuels.

May 27, 1946.

Hobbs *831substituted for Pearson. Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.

*Solicitor General McGrath*for petitioner.

*Harry Mesará*for respondents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    6
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE FUND AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
                                                     <CIK>          0000811860
<NAME>                    SATURNA  INVESTMENT  TRUST
<SERIES>
                                                           <NUMBER>          1
   <NAME>                    SEXTANT  GROWTH  FUND
                                                       <MULTIPLIER>          1
                                                <CURRENCY>          US DOLLARS
       

<CAPTION>



<S>                          <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>               DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                 NOV-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>            1301919
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>           2015949
<RECEIVABLES>                       1423
<ASSETS-OTHER>                    178415
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   2195787
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>               0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>           7420
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                 7420
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                        0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>         1474407
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             228245
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>            203,875
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>              0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>              (70)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>               0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>          714030
<NET-ASSETS>                     2188367
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                  17551
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      0
<OTHER-INCOME>                         0
<EXPENSES-NET>                     20044
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>           (2,493)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>          171838
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         315222
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>             484567
<EQUALIZATION>                         0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>              0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                  0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>            42459
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>      (34,919)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                16830
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           572,811
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>             0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              11819
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                    20044
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>             1924438
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>               7.92
<PER-SHARE-NII>                    (0.01)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>             2.41
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                0.01
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>           0.73
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                   0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                 9.58
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                     1.04
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                 0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                   0
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Wilshire Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report"), I, S. Wilzig
Izak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or 78o(d);
and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
March 31, 2010


By:
                  /s/
      S. Wilzig IzakS.
      Wilzig IzakChief
      Executive
Officer
NUMBER 13-20-00412-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE DIANNA BERNSEN

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus or Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

Relator Dianna Bernsen filed a petition for “Writ of Habeas Corpus or Mandamus”

and motion for emergency stay in the above cause on October 1, 2020, seeking to void

the trial court’s judgment of contempt. The judgment orders the Relator’s confinement in 

the Nueces County jail for a period of ninety days. Through the motion for emergency 

stay, relator seeks to stay the trial court’s judgment of contempt pending resolution of this 

original proceeding.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency stay, 

is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion for emergency stay is 
2

GRANTED and the trial court’s judgment of contempt is ordered STAYED pending further 

order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) 

(“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case 

is finally decided.”).

The Court requests that the real parties in interest1, or any others whose interest 

would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of 

mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

5th day of October, 2020.

1 Real parties in interest include: the ward Leon Bernsen Sr., the temporary guardian for the ward 

R. Clay Hoblit, Bernsen Farms, Ltd., Lynn Bernsen Allison, and Bradley Pickens.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL FAST FOOD CORPORATION,  INC. FOR THE SIX
MONTHS  ENDED JUNE 30,  1997,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

        
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                              3,208,521 
<SECURITIES>                                0 
<RECEIVABLES>                         544,235 
<ALLOWANCES>                                0 
<INVENTORY>                           263,026 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    4,163,029 
<PP&E>                              8,394,664 
<DEPRECIATION>                      3,016,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     11,329,330 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               2,889,349 
<BONDS>                             2,756,000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0 
<PREFERRED>                               369 
<COMMON>                              175,655 
<OTHER-SE>                          1,871,601 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       11,329,330 
<SALES>                             2,752,559 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    2,804,037 
<CGS>                               1,119,022 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       1,641,662 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      817,731 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    273,171 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       402,020 
<INCOME-TAX>                                0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   402,020 
<DISCONTINUED>                              0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0 
<CHANGES>                                   0 
<NET-INCOME>                          402,020 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .03 
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .03 
                                               

</TABLE>