alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w29






EXHIBIT 10.29









January 14, 2009




Mike Long

3 Stegner Lane

Austin, Texas 78746




     Re:      Employment Agreement



Dear Mike:




     This letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) amends and modifies the terms of the employment
agreement entered into between you and Move, Inc. (f/k/a Homestore.com, Inc.) dated March 6, 2002
(the “Employment Agreement”) as follows.



The following language shall be added to the end of Section 8.(b) of the Employment Agreement:




“During the period in which you receive the Cash Severance, you shall be entitled to also
receive the benefits set forth in Section 4(d) of this agreement. In addition, in the event
of your Involuntary Termination, Termination for Death or Disability, or Termination without
Cause, subject to your execution (or the execution by your executor or personal
representative in the case of your death) of the acknowledgment and release attached as
Exhibit A, and your continued cooperation with the Company as directed by the Board of
Directors up to such termination, all Company stock options granted to you shall be
exercisable for a period of three (3) years after the final payment of the Cash Severance;
provided, however, that the Options described in Section 5 of this agreement shall be
exercisable until their expiration as set forth in Section 5.”



     Except as specifically stated in this Letter Agreement, all of the terms and conditions of the
Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. Any capitalized terms not defined herein are
as defined in the Employment Agreement.



     Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing terms by signing and returning this Letter
Agreement to me.




     Thank you.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Best regards,

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Joe Hanauer
 	 
	 	 	Joe Hanauer 	 
	 	 	Chairman of the Board

Move, Inc. 	 
	 
	 	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ W. Michael Long
 	 
	 	 	W. Michael Long
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of E-Sync Networks, Inc.;

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
E-Sync Networks, Inc., Nos. 33-7271 and 333-92933 on Form S-8, of our reports
dated April 11, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of E-Sync
Networks, Inc. as of December 31, 2000 and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows and for each of
the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2000 which reports are
included in the annual report on Form 10-K.

KPMG LLP

New York, New York
April 11, 2001
Order issued November 15, 2012

In The 

## Court of Appta 

# IEift1 Markt of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-00925-CR
BILLY LUFTHANSA BARNES, Appellant

V. 

### THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-22227-Y



### ORDER The Court DENIES court reporter Sharon Hazlewood's second request for an extension of time to file the reporter's record. We ORDERthe trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant has been deprived of the reporter's record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any other
reason.LANA MYERS JUSTICE o The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.
o If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter's record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.
o The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter's explanation for the delay in filing the reporter's record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter's record can be filed. We ORDERthe trial court to transmit a supplemental record containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order. The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, whichever is earlier.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Morvin Mahipat, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 872]

*1244Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20), defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. That contention “does not survive his guilty plea or his waiver of the right to appeal because there was no showing ‘that the plea bargaining process was infected by [the] allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of his attorney[’s] allegedly poor performance’ ” *(People v Leonard,*37 AD3d 1148, 1149 [2007], *lv denied*8 NY3d 947 [2007]). In any event, defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review inasmuch as he failed to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground *(see id.).*

Defendant further contends that County Court should have recused itself because the victim was an Appellate Division Justice with whom the court had a personal relationship. That contention also is encompassed by the waiver of the right to appeal and is unpreserved for our review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *Leonard,*37 AD3d at 1149). In any event, that contention lacks merit. Present—Smith, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Green, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  April 12, 2010 | Signed:  /s/Murray G. Smith             
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------
|                      | Murray G. Smith,
Chief Financial Officer
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 394 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

15-year recovery period for qualified leasehold improvement property, 

qualified restaurant property, and qualified retail improvement property. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. BROWN, Mr. HELLER, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. VITTER, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. CRAPO, and Mr. 

ROBERTS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the 15-year recovery period for qualified leasehold 

improvement property, qualified restaurant property, and 

qualified retail improvement property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Depreciation Fairness 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 394 IS

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF TREATMENT OF QUALI2 FIED LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENT PROPERTY 

3 AS 15-YEAR PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF 

4 DEPRECIATION DEDUCTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 168(e)(3)(E)(iv) of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘placed in service before January 1, 2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

10 December 31, 2014. 

11 SEC. 3. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF TREATMENT OF QUALI12 FIED RESTAURANT PROPERTY AS 15-YEAR 

13 PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF DEPRECIA14 TION DEDUCTION. 

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 168(e)(3)(E)(v) of the In16 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

17 ‘‘placed in service before January 1, 2015’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

20 December 31, 2014. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 394 IS

1 SEC. 4. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF TREATMENT OF QUALI2 FIED RETAIL IMPROVEMENT PROPERTY AS 

3 15-YEAR PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF DE4 PRECIATION DEDUCTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 168(e)(3)(E)(ix) of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘, 

7 and before January 1, 2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

10 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
SALIVA DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Three months ended              Nine months ended
                                              September 30,                   September 30,
                                         --------------------            --------------------
                                         2001            2000            2001            2000
                                         ----            ----            ----            ----
<S>                                  <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Basic earnings:
Net (loss)                           $    (86,107)   $   (236,673)   $   (446,848)   $   (807,895)
                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
Shares:
Weighted common shares outstanding     30,378,156      23,976,944      29,743,017      18,784,172
                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
Basic net  (loss) per share          $      -        $      (0.01)   $      (0.02)   $      (0.04)
                                     ============    ============    ============    ============
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 33-15598, 333-36204, 333-56946,
333-59290, 333-83971, and 333-89876  on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 333-80253 on Form S-3 of Frontier Oil Corporation of our reports
dated February 19, 2004, appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Frontier Oil Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas
March 8, 2004
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): December 9, 2016





Vail Resorts, Inc.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)





Delaware001-0961451-0291762(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)390 Interlocken CrescentBroomfield, Colorado80021(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(303) 404-1800





Not Applicable(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


[  ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[  ] Soliciting materials pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[  ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[  ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))














---










Item 2.02.  Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On December 9, 2016, Vail Resorts, Inc. issued a press release announcing its results for the three months ended October 31, 2016.  A copy of the press release is being furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(d) Exhibits.





A list of exhibits furnished herewith is contained on the Exhibit Index which immediately precedes such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.














---










SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Vail Resorts, Inc.Date: December 9, 2016By:/s/ Michael Z. BarkinMichael Z. BarkinExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer











EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1Press Release, dated December 9, 2016, announcing fiscal fiscal 2017 first quarter results.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7433

ROBERT LLOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EARNEST SMITH, Disciplinary Hearing Officer;

KENNETH HARRIS, Director, Classification

Committee; DONALD ASKREW, Sergeant; OFFICER

JENKINS; LIEUTENANT DAVIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-95-114-CT-BR-5)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 23, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Lloyd v. Smith, No. CA-95-114-CT-BR-5 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order filed October 18, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00714-CV

___________

KENNETH LABARRON FLOWERS, Appellant

V.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 321010311

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter 

for the 311th District Court informed this court that appellant had not made 

arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On August 17, 2018, the clerk 

of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that 

do not require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, 

provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply. 
Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty 

days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court 

will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000717

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
STUART B. GLAUBERMAN and VICKY RAMIL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, v. CELESTE M. GONSALVES, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

KĀNE OHE DIVISION (CIVIL NO. 1DRC-21-0001879)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.) Upon consideration of self-represented Defendant/ Counterclaimant-Appellant Celeste M. Gonsalves's ( Gonsalves ) July 26, 2024 Motion To Extend Time to File Opening Brief and August 5, 2024 Motion To Dismiss Appeal As Moot And Remand To Honolulu District Court, the papers in support and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Gonsalves's July 26, 2024 Motion To Extend Time to File Opening Brief is denied, because her request to dismiss her appeal is being granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Gonsalves's August 5, 2024 Motion To Dismiss Appeal As Moot And Remand To Honolulu Distric t Court is granted in part and denied in part. The appeal is Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-23-0000717 21-AUG-2024 08:02 AM Dkt. 71 OGMDNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

dismissed without prejudice to Gonsalves requesting relief in the district court. 1 All other relief requested is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, August 21, 2024. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

1 Although Gonsalves' August 5, 2024 motion refers to the Honolulu District Court, it appears the case is pending in the Kāne ohe Division. 2
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranskaryoticTherapies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned, Gregory D. Perry , Vice President, Finance, andChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
Date: November 9, 2004              /s/ Gregory D. Perry   Gregory D. Perry   Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
[No. 31523-8-II.

Division Two.

October 18, 2005.]

#### Robin Benskin, *Individually and as Personal Representative,*et al., *Appellants,*v. The City of Fife, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 03-2-11971-2, Ronald E. Culpepper, J., entered March 12, 2004. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., concurred in by Houghton, J., and Morgan, J. Pro Tern.
Exhibit 21.1



WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008

The following table includes the subsidiaries of Wisconsin Electric Power Company, an electric, gas and steam utility incorporated in the state of Wisconsin, as well as the percent of ownership, as of December 31, 2008.  Wisconsin Electric is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wisconsin Energy Corporation.



|Subsidiary (a)                    | State of
Incorporationor Organization | PercentOwnership
|--------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ----------------
|                                  |                                       |                 
|ATC Management Inc.               | Wisconsin                             | 26.23%          
|American Transmission Company LLC | Wisconsin                             | 23.03%          
|Bostco LLC                        | Wisconsin                             | 100%            



|(a) | Omits the names of certain subsidiaries, which if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a "significant subsidiary" as of December 31, 2008.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
  "Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated
  November 14, 1997, in the Registration Statement and related
  Prospectus of The Municipal Bond Trust, Series 231.
  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
  New York, New York
  November 24, 1997
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000717

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STUART B. GLAUBERMAN and VICKY RAMIL,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, v.

CELESTE M. GONSALVES, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

KĀNE OHE DIVISION

(CIVIL NO. 1DRC-21-0001879)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon consideration of self-represented Defendant/

Counterclaimant-Appellant Celeste M. Gonsalves's (Gonsalves)

July 26, 2024 Motion To Extend Time to File Opening Brief and

August 5, 2024 Motion To Dismiss Appeal As Moot And Remand To

Honolulu District Court, the papers in support and the record, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Gonsalves's July 26, 2024

Motion To Extend Time to File Opening Brief is denied, because

her request to dismiss her appeal is being granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Gonsalves's August 5, 2024

Motion To Dismiss Appeal As Moot And Remand To Honolulu District

Court is granted in part and denied in part. The appeal is

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-23-0000717

21-AUG-2024

08:02 AM

Dkt. 71 OGMD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

dismissed without prejudice to Gonsalves requesting relief in the

district court.1 All other relief requested is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, August 21, 2024.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Acting Chief Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry

Associate Judge

1 Although Gonsalves' August 5, 2024 motion refers to the Honolulu

District Court, it appears the case is pending in the Kāne ohe Division. 

2
Exhibit 32.2

 

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersignedChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisconsin Public ServiceCorporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on their knowledge,that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Larry L. WeyersLarry L. WeyersChairman and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Joseph P. O'LearyJoseph P. O'LearySenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 9, 2005

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Wisconsin PublicService Corporation for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Wisconsin Public Service Corporation and will be retained byWisconsin Public Service Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.