alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, JEFFREY D. SERKES, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of WEST PENN POWER
COMPANY.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: September 24, 2003                           /s/ Jeffrey D. Serkes
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Jeffrey D. Serkes
                                                   Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 24
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

WHEREAS, the undersigned officers and directors of Wilshire Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") desire to authorize Daniel C. Pryor and Seth H. Ugelow to act as
their attorneys-in-fact and agents, for the purpose of executing and filing the
registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K, including all amendments and
supplements thereto,

         NOW, THEREFORE,

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Daniel C. Pryor and Seth H. Ugelow and
each of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, to sign the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, including any and all amendments
to such Annual Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their
or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this power of
attorney in the following capacities as of the 30 day of March, 2005.

DIRECTORS:

By:      /s/ Miles Berger                            Date:    March 30, 2005
         ----------------------------
         Miles Berger

By:      /s/ Milton Donnenberg              `        Date:    March 30, 2005
         ----------------------------
         Milton Donnenberg

By:      /s/ S. Wilzig Izak                          Date:    March 30, 2005
         ----------------------------
         S. Wilzig Izak

By:      /s/ Eric J. Schmertz, Esq.                  Date:    March 30, 2005
         ----------------------------
         Eric J. Schmertz, Esq.

By:      /s/ Ernest Wachtel                         Date:    March 30, 2005
         ----------------------------
         Ernest Wachtel

By:      /s/ Martin Willschick                      Date:    March 30, 2005
         ----------------------------
         Martin Willschick



<PAGE>



OFFICERS:

By:      /s/ S. Wilzig Izak                          Date:    March 30, 2005
         ----------------------------
         S. Wilzig Izak
         Chairman of the Board and
         Chief Executive Officer

By:      /s/ Daniel C. Pryor                         Date:    March 30, 2005
         ----------------------------
         Daniel C. Pryor
         President and
         Chief Operating Officer

By:      /s/ Seth H. Ugelow                          Date:    March 30, 2005
         ----------------------------
         Seth H. Ugelow
         Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

As Adopted Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 29, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  
|------------------
|                  
|/s/ Peter L. Lynch
|Peter L. Lynch    
|                  
|August 29, 2011
EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


The subsidiaries of the Company at October 2, 1999 were:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         State or Other Jurisdiction     Percentage
        Name of Subsidiary                        in which Organized   of Ownership
   ----------------------------          ---------------------------   ------------
<S>                                      <C>                           <C>
AI/FOCS, Inc.                                    State of Delaware             100%
Aero-Motive Company                              State of Michigan             100%
Aero-Motive (U.K.) Limited                          United Kingdom             100%
  Woodhead France S.A.R.L.                                  France             100%
    Elitec S.A.                                             France             100%
Central Rubber Company                           State of Illinois             100%
Daniel Woodhead Company                          State of Delaware             100%
H. F. Vogel GmbH Electrotechnische Fabrik                  Germany             100%
mPm S.r.l.                                                   Italy             100%
  mPm Elettronica S.r.l                                      Italy             100%
  mPm Handels GmbH                                         Germany             100%
  E.L. Sind S.r.l.                                           Italy              70%
Woodhead Asia Pte. Ltd.                                  Singapore             100%
Woodhead Canada Limited                    Province of Nova Scotia             100%
Woodhead de Mexico S.A. de C.V.                             Mexico             100%
Woodhead Finance Company                   Province of Nova Scotia             100%
Woodhead Industries (The Netherlands)B.V.          The Netherlands             100%
Akapp Electro Industrie B.V.                       The Netherlands             100%
Woodhead Japan Corporation                                   Japan             100%
W.I.S. Corp.                                   U.S. Virgin Islands             100%
</TABLE>

                                       54
1 Although Mr. Martin did f ile a pleadin g sty led “Motion f or Injunc tiv e Relief

,” it does not s eek an injuncti on, but rather an accounti ng as to a trust fund which he contends he had establi shed for his chi ldren. 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on

Briefs O ctober 31, 2002 NANCY BARNARD MARTIN v. CHARLES HOWARD MARTIN

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sevier County No. 00-8-318 Telford E. Forgety, Jr., Chancellor

FILED FEBRUARY 19, 2003
No. E2001-01569-COA-R3-CV

Charles Howard M artin

appeals a judgme

nt of the T rial Cour t which aw arded N ancy

Barna rd Martin a divorc e and ce

rtain othe r relief . We affir

m. Tenn.R.App. P. 3 Appe al as of Right ; Judgme nt of the Cha

ncery Court Affirm

ed; Cause Remanded H OUSTON M. G ODDARD , P.J. 

### , delivered the opinion of the court, in which H ERSCHEL P. F RANKS and C HARLES D. S USANO , J., JJ. 

### , joined. Charles Howard Martin, Pro Se John H. Fow ler, Sevi erville, Tenness ee, for the Appe llee, Na

ncy Barna rd Mara tin 

### MEMORANDU M OPINION

Charles Howard M arti n, an inmate of the Penal System of this State, appea ls a judgment rendered in a divorce proceeding. He que stions whether the personal property of the parties was equitabl y divided, whether he was entitled to an injunctive relief, 1 whether the Trial Court err ed in not issuing eight subpoenas on his behalf, and whether the Trial Court erred

in giving him notice that the divorce hearing was set for June 26, 2001, but hearing the case on June 25, 2001.-- 2

Our review of the record

persuades us that the statement of the evidence (se e appendix) filed and approved by the

Trial Court refutes each of the err ors asse rted and that this is an appro

priate c ase for affirmance under Rule 10 of this Court. The cause is remanded to the Trial Court for such fur ther proceedings, if any , as may be necessary and for collection of

costs below. Costs of

appeal are adjudged ag ainst Charles Howard Martin.

_________________________________________ HOUSTON M. GODDARD, PRESIDI NG JUDGE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kyle Hunter, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 880]

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30 [1]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, his “responses to County Court’s questions unequivocally established that [he] understood the proceedings and was voluntarily waiving the right to appeal” *(People v Gilbert,*17 AD3d 1164, 1164 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 762 [2005]). The waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the court’s suppression ruling *(see People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; *People v Gordon,*42 AD3d 964 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 876 [2007]) and, by pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his contention that the court erred in denying his severance motion *(see People v Lynch,*13 AD3d 1142 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 800 [2005]; *People v Smith,*290 AD2d 464 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 702 [2002]). Finally, to the extent that the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his guilty plea and waiver of the right to appeal *(see People v Eastman,*45 AD3d 1411 [2007]; *People v Santos,*37 AD3d 1141 [2007], *Iv denied*8 NY3d 950 [2007]), we conclude that it is lacking in merit *(see generally People v Ford,*86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Present—Smith, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Green, JJ.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): December 4, 2012





Vail Resorts, Inc.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)





Delaware001-0961451-0291762(State or Other Jurisdictionof Incorporation)(CommissionFile Number)(IRS EmployerIdentification No.)390 Interlocken CrescentBroomfield, Colorado80021(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(303) 404-1800


(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


 ̈Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


 ̈Soliciting materials pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Item 2.02.Results of Operations and Financial Condition.


On December 4, 2012, Vail Resorts, Inc. issued a press release announcing its results for the three months ended October 31, 2012. A copy of the press release is being furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.


The information furnished pursuant to this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated therein by reference.





---







Item 9.01.Financial Statements and Exhibits.


(d) Exhibits.


A list of exhibits furnished herewith is contained on the Exhibit Index which immediately precedes such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.





SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Vail Resorts, Inc.Date: December 4, 2012By:/s/ JEFFREY W. JONESJeffrey W. JonesChief Financial Officer and President - Lodging, Retail, Real Estate(Duly Authorized Officer)





EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1Press Release, dated December 4, 2012, announcing fiscal 2013 first quarter results.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CRAIG SHAWN CUMMINGS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1526

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 14, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, 

Judge.

Craig Shawn Cummings, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Curtis v. State, 685 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 1996); Miller v. State, 

460 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 1984); Cummings v. State, 978 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) 

(table decision); Goutier v. State, 692 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); State v. Gray, 

633 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Shelton v. Singletary, 727 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 3d DCA 

1999); Stubbs v. State, 673 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document




































 



 
 

  Exhibit 10.25    
    


 
 

  Schedule of Non-Employee Director Compensation    
    


        Our non-employee directors receive an annual fee of $35,000 and reimbursement of travel expenses in consideration for their
services as directors. Non-employee directors who also serve as members of our Audit Committee receive an additional $15,000 per annum, and the non-employee director who serves
as Chairman of our Audit Committee receives an additional $20,000 per annum. 


        Our
three non-employee directors who are unaffiliated with Oaktree or MTS are also entitled to receive annual restricted stock award grants having a value equal to $80,000.
These awards will fully vest one year after the date of grant based on continued service with us. 



        Our
three non-employee directors who are affiliated with Oaktree or MTS are also entitled to an annual cash payment of $80,000, payable in arrears based on a full year of
service. 


        We
have established a directors' deferred compensation plan for all non-employee directors. Mr. Dimick has elected to participate in the director plan and have his
annual board membership fee of $35,000 deferred into a stock account and converted quarterly into phantom shares. Upon retirement, separation from the Board of Directors, or the occurrence of a change
of control, Mr. Dimick has the option of being paid cash or issued common stock for his phantom shares. No other directors are currently participating in the director plan. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.25


Schedule of Non-Employee Director Compensation
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  Date:              November 09, 2007 |                                                                                                                                                          |                                      |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                          |                                      |
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                          |
|                                  |                                                                                                                                                     |                                 |
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                          | /s/              Leo              Ehrlich |
|                                       | Leo                EhrlichChief                Financial Officer(principal                financial officer and                duly authorized officer)  |
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                          |
No. 1202.

#### W. D. Haden Co. *v.*Walling, Wage & Hour Administrator.

June 10, 1946.

*W. P. Hamblen*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General McGrath, William S. Tyson, Morton Liftin*and *Joseph M. Stone*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felix Americo GIL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-12160

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 27, 2012.

Timothy M. Cole, Eloísa Delgado Fernandez, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Anne Ruth Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*912Michael Caruso, Margaret Y. Foldes, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Miami, FL, for Defendanri-Appellant.

Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Margaret Foldes, appointed counsel for Felix Gil, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals a clerical error in the judgment. Gil pleaded guilty to Counts I, II, and III of the indictment. The written judgment reflects that he was convicted of all three counts, but lists only the corresponding statute for Count I, transfer of fraudulent identification documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(2). It should also identify the corresponding statutes for Counts II and III: furnishing a fraudulent passport in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1543, and possession of a fraudulent entry document in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a). *Cf. United States v. James,*642 F.3d 1333, 1343 (11th Cir.2011) (vacating and remanding where the judgment cited the incorrect statute under which the defendant was convicted).

Aside from this clerical error, our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. We VACATE AND REMAND for the limited purpose of entering a judgment in conformity with the indictment and guilty plea. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no other arguable issues of merit, however, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Gil’s convictions and sentences are otherwise AFFIRMED.