alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification Required
Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the filing of the financial statements of Ophthalmic Imaging Systems
(Registrant) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report),
each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                       |                        
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|Date:  August 14, 2006 |                        
|                       | /s/ Gil Allon          
|                       | Gil Allon              
|                       | Chief Executive Officer
|                       | /s/ Ariel Shenhar      
|                       | Ariel Shenhar          
|                       | Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Eliseo PORTILLO-ARRAS, also known as Samuel Portillo-Ogaz, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10385

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, David E. Sloan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Elíseo Portillo-Arras raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by *United States v. Newson,*515 F.3d 374, 377-78 (5th Cir.2008), which held that the Government may decline to move for an additional one-point reduction under United States Sentencing Guideline § 3El.l(b) based on the defendant’s refusal to waive his right to appeal. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the. district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 11, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-15094

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 07-00085-CR-ORL-28-DAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff–Appellee, 

versus 

TOMMIE J. QUINN, 

a.k.a. The Stik, 

Defendant–Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(June 11, 2008)

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Tommie J. Quinn appeals his 210-month sentence for receiving and

distributing child pornography materials, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2),

(b)(1). On appeal, Quinn argues that his sentence was unreasonable because the

district court failed to adequately consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Quinn

contends that the court focused primarily on one § 3553(a) factor, the nature and

circumstances of his offense, without also considering that he had not committed

any crimes in the year prior to his self-surrender, that the doctor who examined

him opined that he was not a pedophile, and that he had a history of depression. 

After careful review, we find that Quinn’s sentence was both procedurally

and substantively reasonable. Gall v. United States, __ U.S. __, 128 S. Ct. 586,

597–98, 169 L. Ed. 2d 445 (2007); United States v. Agbai, 497 F.3d 1226, 1229

(11th Cir. 2007). The court correctly calculated the Guidelines’ range and

expressly stated that it had considered the § 3553(a) factors. Furthermore, in

imposing the 120-month sentence—at the low end of the Guidelines’ range—the

court provided a reasoned basis for imposing Quinn’s sentence. Thus, we affirm

Quinn’s sentence. 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 360 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 360

   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 2015

 Mr. Crapo (for himself and Mr. Risch) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the 
district of Idaho.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table in section 
133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
relating to Idaho 

              

and inserting the following:

``Idaho....................................................         3''.
 

                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Lee Roy Mitchell, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cinemark USA, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e)
and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;
andc)
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: May 16, 2005 CINEMARK USA, INC.By:
    
    /s/Lee Roy MitchellLee Roy MitchellChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated interim financial statements for the second quarter ended June 30,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                        109,841
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 230,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                   96,781
<INVENTORY>                                   133,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              381,594
<PP&E>                                        952,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                837,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                615,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,590,628
<BONDS>                                        18,451
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                 1,085,000
<COMMON>                                       81,135
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,159,365)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  615,849
<SALES>                                       596,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              596,795
<CGS>                                         483,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 483,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,195,195
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,087,560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,087,560)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)



</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
   By:
    
    /s/Robert CoppleRobert CoppleChief Financial Officer
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 44 toRegistration Statement No. 033-17917 on Form N-1A of our report dated November 12, 2014, relating to the financial statements andfinancial highlights of American High-Income Trust appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of suchRegistration Statement, and to the references to us under the headings “Financial highlights” in the Prospectus and“Independent registered public accounting firm” and “Prospectuses, reports to shareholders and proxy statements”in the Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement.

 

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Costa Mesa, California

November 28, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 227 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 38
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 227

                          [Report No. 108-95]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2) to amend the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 to provide additional tax incentives to encourage 
                            economic growth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2003

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2) to amend the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 to provide additional tax incentives to encourage 
                            economic growth.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 2) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
provide additional tax incentives to encourage economic growth. The 
bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment 
recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill 
shall be considered as adopted. All points of order against the bill, 
as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.

                                                  House Calendar No. 38

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 227

                          [Report No. 108-95]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2) to amend the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 to provide additional tax incentives to encourage 
                            economic growth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 8, 2003

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     Consolidated Balance Sheets at August 2, 1997 and the Consolidated
     Statements of Operations for the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 1997
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000885546
<NAME>                        Today's Man Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000  
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-Mos    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Feb-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-02-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000  
<CASH>                                         16,902,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,059,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      431,000
<INVENTORY>                                    33,271,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               61,353,800
<PP&E>                                         47,244,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,584,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 95,978,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,067,900
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       38,268,100
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,180,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   95,978,700
<SALES>                                        94,394,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               94,394,500
<CGS>                                          60,463,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  60,463,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               31,154,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  2,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   881,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                       53,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               827,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      827,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.08
        



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 4(e)**

 

**FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE**

**WENDY’S INTERNATIONAL, INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN**

 

**WHEREAS**, Wendy’s International, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the Wendy’s International, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2004 (the “Plan”); and 

 

**WHEREAS**, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to reflect the revised defaultinvestment and anti-assignment provisions. 

 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, the Companyamends the Plan as follows: 

 

1. Effective January 1, 2004, Section 6.2 isamended to read as follows: 

 

6.2 Investment Options.Each Participant shall elect the Investment Options in which the Participant’s deferrals shall be deemed invested. A Participant’s deferrals may be allocated in one percent increments among one or more of the Investment Options.Notwithstanding the foregoing, elections regarding Stock Units shall be governed by Section 6.4. If the Participant allocates less than 100% of his or her deferrals pursuant to this Section 6.2, unallocated deferrals shall be deemed to be allocatedto the default investment option established by the Plan Administrator, or if no such default has been established by the Plan Administrator, to the default investment option established under the Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. 

 

2. Effective January 1, 2004, Section 8.2 is amended to read as follows: 

 

8.2 Restrictions Upon Assignments And Creditors’ Claims.****No benefit payable under this Plan shall be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance or charge prior to actual receipt thereof by the Participant or Beneficiary and any attempt toanticipate, alienate, sell, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber or charge prior to such receipt shall be void. No benefit payable under this Plan shall be subject to attachment, garnishment, execution, levy or other legal or equitable proceeding orprocess, and any attempt to do so shall be void. Neither the Company nor any Participating Employer shall be in any manner liable for or subject to the debts, contracts, liabilities, engagements or torts of any Participant or Beneficiary except asmay be required by the tax withholding provisions of the Code or any state’s income tax laws.
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 77 toRegistration Statement No. 002-33371 on Form N-1A of our report dated September 9, 2013, relating to the financial statements andfinancial highlights of The Income Fund of America appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of suchRegistration Statement, and to the references to us under the headings “Financial highlights” in the Prospectus and“Independent registered public accounting firm” and “Prospectuses, reports to shareholders and proxy statements”in the Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement.

 

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Costa Mesa, California

August 27, 2014
No. 1195.

No. 1196.

#### John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc. et al. *v.*United States to the use of the Baltimore Brick Co.; and John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc. et al. *v.*Friedman, trading as J. Friedman Co.

June 10, 1946.

*Emanuel Harris*for petitioners.

*Jesse Slingluff, Jr.*for respondent in No. 1195.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated February 8, 2002, incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of
Frontier Oil Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 into
Frontier Oil Corporations previously filed Registration Statements No.
33-15598, 333-56946, 333-27117, 333-83971, 333-36204 and 333-59290 on Form S-8,
and Registration Statement No. 333-80253 on Form S-3.

| | ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
| | -------------------

Houston, Texas
March 1, 2002