alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wisconsin Electric Power Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Gale E. Klappa, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/GALE E. KLAPPA
SALIVA DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.
                                 March 31, 2005


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven Peltzman, Chief Executive Officer of Saliva Diagnostic Systems, Inc.,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

        (1) that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Saliva Diagnostic
            Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended on March 31, 2005 filed
            with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof at
            File No. 0-21284 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
            of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

        (2) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of Saliva Diagnostic Systems, Inc.

Dated:  July 8, 2005
                                       /s/ Steven M. Peltzman
                                       -----------------------
                                       Steven M. Peltzman
                                       Chief Executive Officer
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 173

Recognizing the achievements and contributions of the National Wildlife Refuge System on the occasion of its centennial anniversary and expressing 

strong support for the continued success of the National Wildlife Refuge 

System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2003

Mr. BOYD (for himself and Mr. PUTNAM) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the achievements and contributions of the National Wildlife Refuge System on the occasion of its 

centennial anniversary and expressing strong support for 

the continued success of the National Wildlife Refuge 

System.

Whereas the National Wildlife Refuge System, operated by 

the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, marked its 

centennial anniversary on March 14, 2003; 

Whereas President Theodore Roosevelt stated in 1903 that 

‘‘Wild beasts and birds are by right not the property 

merely of the people who are alive today, but the property 

of unknown generations, whose belongings we have no 

right to squander.’’; 
2

•HRES 173 IH 

Whereas the vision of conserving wildlife embraced by President Roosevelt was begun with the plants and animals located on Pelican Island off the East Coast of Florida, 

and has since flourished across the United States and its 

territories and possessions, allowing for the preservation 

of an overwhelmingly vast array of flora and fauna; 

Whereas the National Wildlife Refuge System is composed of 

540 refuges encompassing nearly 95 million acres, hosts 

35 million visitors annually, and benefits from the selfless 

efforts of 30,000 volunteers; and 

Whereas the National Wildlife Refuge System has established 

refuges in every State in the United States, many of 

which are reachable within an hour’s drive of almost 

every major city: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes the achievements and contribu3 tions of the National Wildlife Refuge System on the 

4 occasion of its centennial anniversary; 

5 (2) expresses strong support for the continued 

6 success of the National Wildlife Refuge System; 

7 (3) encourages the United States Fish and 

8 Wildlife Service in its efforts to broaden under9 standing and appreciation for the National Wildlife 

10 Refuge System by increasing partnerships on behalf 

11 of the refuge system to better manage and monitor 

12 wildlife and by continuing its support of wildlife de13 pendent recreational activities as embodied in the 
3

•HRES 173 IH 

1 Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (Public 

2 Law 105–57); and 

3 (4) reaffirms its commitment to the National 

4 Wildlife Refuge System and the conservation of the 

5 rich natural heritage of the United States.

Æ
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000517 24-FEB-2020 07:47 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Swift Energy Pension Partners 1991-C, Ltd., was in the process of
liquidation as of March 31, 2000 and as such is governed by liquidation basis
accounting.  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Swift Energy Pension Partners 1991-C, Ltd's statement of net assets
in process of liquidation and statement of operations contained in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statement.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1,784
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  44,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               46,681
<PP&E>                                         1,192,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,239,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,717
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        63,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               63,427
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,089<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                658,630
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            658,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   658,630
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Thomas A. Lenkiewicz, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District, Petitioner.

[853 NYS2d 519]

Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Gorski, JJ. (Filed Feb. 27, 2008.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Frontier Oil Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James R.
Gibbs, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

| | (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.

/s/  James R. Gibbs
James R. Gibbs
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer

October 13, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          31,981
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               2
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                25,796
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    113,273
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         125,598
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           126,414
<LOANS>                                      1,736,151
<ALLOWANCE>                                     21,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,057,635
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,431,288
<SHORT-TERM>                                   331,178
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             31,057
<LONG-TERM>                                    133,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,648
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,057,635
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 34,249
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,210
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    97
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                38,556
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              16,511
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,909
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,647
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      125
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,882
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,882
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,119
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.92
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,145
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   704
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  9,890
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                21,833
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      301
<RECOVERIES>                                        98
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               21,755
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            21,755
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         19,914
        

</TABLE>
----

|        · | a      salary, reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee of the Board of      Directors of Frontier; |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        · | eligibility      for an annual cash bonus, as determined by the Compensation      Committee; |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        · | eligibility      for awards under Frontier’s Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, as      determined by the CompensationCommittee; |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        · | health,      life, disability, death and other insurance and/or    benefits; |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        · | defined      contribution pension and savings plan;and |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|

|        · | vacation,      paid sick leave and all other employeebenefits. |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|

|   Executive      Officer                                                          |  2010      Annual Base Salary | Incentive      Target for 2010(Percentage      for Base Salary) |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|  James      R. Gibbs Chairman      of the Board                              |  $975,000                     |  100%                                                      |
|  Michael      C. Jennings Chief      Executive Officer and President         |  $775,000                     |  100%                                                      |
|  Douglas      S. Aron Executive      Vice President-Chief Financial Officer  |  $380,000                     |  60%                                                       |
|  Jon      D. Galvin Vice      President                                      |  $305,000                     |  50%                                                       |
|  Nancy      J. Zupan Vice      President-Chief Accounting Officer            |  $325,000                     |  50%                                                       |
|  J.      Currie Bechtol Vice      President-General Counsel & Secretary       |  $342,000                     |  50%                                                       |
Xedar Corporation
2500 Central Avenue
Boulder, CO 80301

March 26, 1999

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, we are transmitting herewith the attached Form
10KSB.
The filing fee of $250.00 has been remitted by wire to the
Mellon Bank for our CIK account.

Sincerely,

Hans R. Bucher

Hans R. Bucher
President



U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
Form 10-KSB
(Mark One):
(x) Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended
    December 26, 1998

or

( ) Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    for the transition period from   to

Commission File Number  0-8356

XEDAR CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        Colorado

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

             84-0684753
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

        2500 Central Avenue, Boulder, CO            80301
        (Address of principal executive offices)  (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number incl. Area code:(303) 443-6441

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None
Title of each class   Name of each exchange on which registered
                                None


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, No Par Value
(Title of class)


(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
                                                           Yes X  No
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40224

 

STEVEN LOWE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN GABRIEL CASARES, Individually, and

In his Official Capacity as Safety Officer

for the City of Corpus Christi Police

Department, ET AL.,

Defendants,

NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(CA-94-CV-234)

 

December 3, 1996

Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

Having considered the briefs and the relevant portions of the

record, this Court concludes that the district court properly
2

granted the motion for summary judgment of defendant-appellee

Nueces County. For the reasons orally stated by the district

court, we agree that there was no summary judgment evidence which

would sustain a finding that any of the claimed deficiencies in

training or hiring policy on the part of the County amounted to

deliberate indifference to the constitutional rights of its

residents as required by City of Canton v. Harris, 109 S.Ct. 1197

(1989). Nor has an adequate nexus been shown between the alleged

training or hiring inadequacy and the injury suffered, as required

by City of Canton. See also City of Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, 105

S.Ct. 2427, 2436 (1985). As Munson was released from his position

as reserve deputy constable and was prosecuted by the Nueces County

district attorney, and as there was an investigation into the

incident, albeit not by the precinct one constable, Grandstaff v.

City of Borger, 767 F.2d 161 (5th Cir. 1985), is not in point. The

judgment of the district court is accordingly 

AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10771

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHRIS JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CV-832

USDC No. 4:00-CR-250-ALL

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Chris Ryan Jackson, federal prisoner # 06914-089, was convicted by a jury

of one count of possession with intent to distribute 30 grams of cocaine in

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C); one count of carrying a firearm

during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(c)(1); and two counts of possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18

U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). We previously affirmed his conviction and

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 11, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10771

2

sentence on direct appeal, rejecting, inter alia, the argument that in light of

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), the district court committed plain

error when it found certain facts relative to sentencing. Jackson subsequently

filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, which the district court denied. A judge of this

court granted a certificate of appealability on one of the nine claims that Jackson

sought to raise on appeal: whether counsel’s failure to raise an objection to the

district court’s findings of drug type and quantity pursuant to Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. 

Jackson was sentenced to 168 months in prison on the drug count. That

sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum of 20 years that applies when

the amount of cocaine is less than 500 grams. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). In

other words, Jackson’s sentence did not exceed the maximum authorized by the

jury verdict; thus, there was no Apprendi violation. See United States v. Cooper,

274 F.3d 230, 243 (5th Cir. 2001); United States v. Doggett, 230 F.3d 160, 164-65

(5th Cir. 2000). It follows that counsel did not render ineffective assistance by

failing to raise what would have been a meritless Apprendi-based objection. See

United States v. Kimler, 167 F.3d 889, 893 (5th Cir. 1999).

As for any failure of counsel to preserve an objection to judicial factfinding

regarding drug type and quantity in light of Booker, there likewise was no

ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Fields, 565 F.3d 290,

293-97 (5th Cir. 2009). 

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
No. 1115.

#### Borrelli *v.*Illinois.

June 10, 1946.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 440 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 

for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student loan 

repayment or forgiveness programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2015 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. RISCH, Mr. KING, Mr. ROBERTS, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. BENNET, Mr. ISAKSON, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. LEAHY, Ms. HIRONO, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for an exclusion for assistance provided to participants 

in certain veterinary student loan repayment or forgiveness programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterinary Medicine 

5 Loan Repayment Program Enhancement Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 440 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO PAR2 TICIPANTS IN CERTAIN VETERINARY STU3 DENT LOAN REPAYMENT OR FORGIVENESS 

4 PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 108(f) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘such Act,’’, 

8 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert9 ing ‘‘, under section 1415A of the National Agricul10 tural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act 

11 of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3151a), or under any other State 

12 loan repayment or loan forgiveness program that is 

13 intended to provide for increased access to veteri14 nary services in such State.’’, and 

15 (3) by striking ‘‘STATE’’ in the heading and in16 serting ‘‘OTHER’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to amounts received by an indi19 vidual in taxable years beginning after December 31, 

20 2014. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS