alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3462 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3462

 To provide for a 6-month delay in the effective date of a rule of the 
   Department of Labor relating to income thresholds for determining 
   overtime pay for executive, administrative, professional, outside 
                     sales, and computer employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2016

 Mr. Lankford (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Scott, and 
  Mr. Flake) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a 6-month delay in the effective date of a rule of the 
   Department of Labor relating to income thresholds for determining 
   overtime pay for executive, administrative, professional, outside 
                     sales, and computer employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Regulatory Relief for Small 
Businesses, Schools, and Nonprofits Act''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF RULE.

    (a) Effective Date.--Notwithstanding the effective date set forth 
in the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to exemptions 
regarding the rates of pay for executive, administrative, professional, 
outside sales, and computer employees (81 Fed. Reg. 32552 (May 23, 
2016)), such rule shall not take effect until June 1, 2017.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
to provide authority for the rule described in subsection (a), nor any 
part thereof, that is not otherwise provided by law.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

I, Henry Fahman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CATALYST RESOURCE GROUP, INC.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the year covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the years presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the year in which this report is being prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the year covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors;

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 31, 2011

 /s/ Henry Fahman         

Henry Fahman

Interim Chief Executive/Financial Officer

 

----
**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

 

  I, **Nicholas Kaiser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Semi-Annual Report on Form N-CSRS for the period ended May 31, 2016 (the “Report”).

 I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

  Date: 07/29/2016  /s/ *Nicholas Kaiser*  President 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

  I, **Christopher Fankhauser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Semi-Annual Report on Form N-CSRS for the period ended May 31, 2016 (the “Report”).

I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

Date: 07/29/2016

/s/ *Christopher Fankhauser*Treasurer, Chief Compliance Officer
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 38710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17151]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--3D PDF Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 13, 2017, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), 3D PDF Consortium, Inc. (``3D 
PDF'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Advanced 
Technology International, Summerville, SC; and Elysium Co. Ltd., 
Shizuoka, JAPAN, have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and 3D PDF intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 27, 2012, 3D PDF filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
April 20, 2012 (77 FR 23754).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 25, 
2016. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on November 29, 2016 (81 FR 86013).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-17151 Filed 8-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

LAWRENCE L. MAYES, Petitioner-Appellant,

v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA; COUNTY OF OKLAHOMA, Respondents-Appellees. No. 13-6280 (D.C. No. 5:13-CV-01080-C) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

Before KELLY , MATHESON , and BACHARACH , Circuit Judges.

Lawrence L. Mayes seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to secure review of a district court order dismissing his “Pet ition of Notice of Intent to Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeal s” as a second-or-successive habeas petition lacking the authorization required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). The district court’s disposition was indisputably correct and th is effort to appeal that disposition is frivolous. We deny a COA, dismiss the appeal, and deny Mr. Mayes’ motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.

* This order is not binding precedent excep t under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and colla teral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### March 20, 2014

Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court- 2 - The “petition” Mr. Mayes filed in the district court challenges the same 2005 armed robbery conviction that he has unsuccessfully ch allenged numerous times in pleadings filed both with the district court a nd this court. The di strict court properly held that the novel label he applied to th is latest pleading—styling it as an inapt “appeal” from proceedings in the Oklahom a Court of Criminal Appeals—did not

alter the fact that it was a second-or-successive habeas petition. As such, it is subject to the constraints in § 2244(b), in partic ular to the jurisdic tional requirement of pre-authorization by this court under § 2 244(b)(3), with which Mr. Mayes did not comply. 1 Dismissal was undebatably the appropr iate disposition by the district court and, thus, a COA is unwarranted. See Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (holding in pertinent part that to obtai n a COA the petitioner-appellant must show “that jurists of reason would find it debatabl e whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling”). Accordingly, we deny a COA and dismis s this appeal. Mr. Mayes’ motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperi s is also denied. We remind Mr. Mayes that his obligation to remit the full amount of the filing fee persists despite our denial

1 We note that a separately pursued motion from Mr. Mayes seeking such authorization for claims that are also asserted in the “petition” here was recently denied as meritless by this court.- 3 - of a COA and dismissal of this appeal. See Clark v. Oklahoma , 468 F.3d 711, 714-15 (10th Cir. 2006).

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 389 

To amend section 1111(h)(1)(C)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to require that annual State report cards reflect 

the same race groups as the decennial census of population. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Ms. HIRONO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend section 1111(h)(1)(C)(i) of the Elementary and 

Secondary Education Act of 1965 to require that annual 

State report cards reflect the same race groups as the 

decennial census of population. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘All Students Count 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 389 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISAGGREGATION OF INFORMATION ON STUDENT 

2 ACHIEVEMENT IN ANNUAL STATE REPORT 

3 CARDS. 

4 Section 1111(h)(1)(C)(i) of the Elementary and Sec5 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

6 6311(h)(1)(C)(i)) is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(i) information, in the aggregate and 

8 disaggregated by the same major race 

9 groups as the decennial census of the pop10 ulation, ethnicity, gender, disability status, 

11 migrant status, English proficiency, and 

12 status as economically disadvantaged, and 

13 cross-tabulated across all of such sub14 groups by gender, by disability, and by 

15 English proficiency, on student achieve16 ment at each proficiency level on the State 

17 academic assessments described in sub18 section (b)(3), except that such 

19 disaggregation and cross-tabulation shall 

20 not be required in a case in which the 

21 number of students in a subgroup is insuf22 ficient to yield statistically reliable infor23 mation or the results would reveal person24 ally identifiable information about an indi25 vidual student;’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 389 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 389

   To amend section 1111(h)(1)(C)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 to require that annual State report cards reflect 
      the same race groups as the decennial census of population.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 5, 2015

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 1111(h)(1)(C)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 to require that annual State report cards reflect 
      the same race groups as the decennial census of population.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``All Students Count Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. DISAGGREGATION OF INFORMATION ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN ANNUAL 
              STATE REPORT CARDS.

    Section 1111(h)(1)(C)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary Education 
Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(h)(1)(C)(i)) is amended to read as follows:
                            ``(i) information, in the aggregate and 
                        disaggregated by the same major race groups as 
                        the decennial census of the population, 
                        ethnicity, gender, disability status, migrant 
                        status, English proficiency, and status as 
                        economically disadvantaged, and cross-tabulated 
                        across all of such subgroups by gender, by 
                        disability, and by English proficiency, on 
                        student achievement at each proficiency level 
                        on the State academic assessments described in 
                        subsection (b)(3), except that such 
                        disaggregation and cross-tabulation shall not 
                        be required in a case in which the number of 
                        students in a subgroup is insufficient to yield 
                        statistically reliable information or the 
                        results would reveal personally identifiable 
                        information about an individual student;''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0379

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CLAYTON LEE WELLKNOWN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 5, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 28 2021

06/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0379
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KYRA JEMUEL MOBLEY o/b/o JULIANNA MOBLEY-BOYD,

Appellant,

v.

LEONARD LAMAR BOYD, JR.,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3031

[February 16, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Susan Greenhawt, Senior Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

DVCE21-006689 and DVCE21-006690.

Kyra Jemuel Mobley, Plantation, pro se.

Leonard Lamar Boyd, Jr., Oakland Park, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

GROSS, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                 PRO-FORMA
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      744,951
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    210,422
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         173,264
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         3,164
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  11,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,143,781
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            209,338<F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           585,224
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   29,590
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 319,629
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,143,781
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      106,318
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      90,860
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      90,860
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         15,458
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,328
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                       0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        13,976
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,810
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          48,203
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>Old Dominion is organized and operated as a cooperative. Patronage capital is
the ratained net margins of Old Dominion which have been allocated to its
members based on their respective power purchases in accordance with Old
Dominion's bylaws.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
IV 

House Calendar No. 3

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 29

[Report No. 108–3] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 13) making 

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2003

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

13) making further continuing appropriations for the 

fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. 

4 Res. 13) making further continuing appropriations for the 

5 fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes. The joint resolu6 tion shall be considered as read for amendment. The pre7 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
2

HRES 29 RH 

1 resolution to final passage without intervening motion ex2 cept: (1) one hour of debate on the joint resolution equally 

3 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi4 nority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and 

5 (2) one motion to recommit. 

6 SEC. 2. Upon receipt of a message from the Senate 

7 transmitting House Joint Resolution 2 with a Senate 

8 amendment thereto, it shall be in order to consider in the 

9 House a motion offered by the chairman of the Committee 

10 on Appropriations or his designee that the House disagree 

11 to the Senate amendment and request or agree to a con12 ference with the Senate thereon. 

House Calendar No. 3

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 29

[Report No. 108–3] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 13) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes. 

JANUARY 27, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
Exhibit 11 - Statement re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings:

Net Income Per Common Share:

         In  March  1997,  the  Financial   Accounting  Standards  Board  issued
Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share" which
makes certain changes to the manner in which earnings per share is reported. The
Company has adopted this standard for the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                            1999         1998         1997

Numerator-
  Net income-
    Basic & Diluted                   $  614,000   $1,007,000   $5,536,000

Denominator-
  Weighted average common shares
      outstanding - Basic              8,859,051    9,297,119    9,522,167
   Incremental shares from assumed
       conversions of stock options            -       47,628       89,182
                                      ----------   ----------   ----------


Weighted average common shares
   outstanding - Diluted               8,559,374    9,344,747    9,611,349

Basic earnings per share              $     0.07   $     0.11   $     0.58
Diluted earnings per share            $     0.07   $     0.11   $     0.58