alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of income, the consolidated balance sheet, the
consolidated statement of capitalization, the consolidated statement of
retained earnings and the consolidated statement of cash flows and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        1,630
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          4
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             471
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      84
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,189
<COMMON>                                            76
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                          108
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                497
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                     681
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                8
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               521
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     255
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       25
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            1
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                     697
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    2,189
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,731
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                62
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,520
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,582
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            149
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   5
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     154
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            47
<NET-INCOME>                                       107
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          1
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      106
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           108
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           40
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Nicor Gas is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nicor Inc.  Earning and dividends
per share information is therefore omitted.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<S>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>       Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>   Dec-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>        Dec-25-1999
<CASH>                                      377008
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               116301
<ALLOWANCES>                                  2007
<INVENTORY>                                 153204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            648520
<PP&E>                                      141307
<DEPRECIATION>                              127666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              820213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        62309
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   1617617
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                     40
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                757904
<SALES>                                     245219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            245219
<CGS>                                       367903
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               367903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            188703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             285797
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         285797
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                285797
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .16


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 482 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 482

   To increase from $10,000,000,000 to $50,000,000,000 the threshold 
figure at which regulated depository institutions are subject to direct 
   examination and reporting requirements of the Bureau of Consumer 
             Financial Protection, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2015

  Mr. Toomey (for himself and Mr. Donnelly) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To increase from $10,000,000,000 to $50,000,000,000 the threshold 
figure at which regulated depository institutions are subject to direct 
   examination and reporting requirements of the Bureau of Consumer 
             Financial Protection, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 
Examination and Reporting Threshold Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN THE EXAMINATION THRESHOLD.

    Section 1025(a) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 
(12 U.S.C. 5515(a)) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000,000'' each 
place that term appears and inserting ``$50,000,000,000''.

SEC. 3. INCREASE IN THE REPORTING THRESHOLD.

    Section 1026(a) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 
(12 U.S.C. 5516(a)) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000,000'' each 
place that term appears and inserting ``$50,000,000,000''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
the date that is 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Corporate Resolution





Tax-Free Fund For Utah





Be it known that the following corporate resolution is in full force and effect:





WHEREAS The Board of Trustees of the Fund adopted the following resolutions on motion duly made, seconded and carried unanimously at the Fund’s Board of Trustees’ Meetings held on June 12, 2011;





NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proposed fidelity bond with ICI Mutual Insurance Company be and it hereby is approved, as a joint insured bond including the respective Fund and related entities, and





RESOLVED, that there is hereby authorized an annual premium (with premium tax), a reserve premium, and a commitment to ICI Mutual Insurance Company, and





RESOLVED, that allocation of the annual premium and premium tax shall be in accordance with an Agreement Among Insureds to be executed by the respective Fund as an additional party, and





RESOLVED, that the Secretary and the Assistant Secretary are hereby authorized to make any required filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 17g-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940.





Sealed this 22nd day of August 2011.
/s/  John M. HerndonJohn M. Herndon

Assistant Secretary

The Aquila Group of Funds®
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K, including this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, of OPNET Technologies, Inc. (the Company), I, Marc A.
Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: August 19, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ Marc A. Cohen                   
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|                       |  |     |  | Marc A. Cohen                       
|                       |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to OPNET Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by OPNET Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 1092.

#### Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. *v.*Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co., Inc. et al.

May 6, 1946.

*Wm. H. Davis*and *Louis Burgess*for petitioner.

*Morris Kirschstein*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.14

Commitment Letter From Bank One

February 5,
2003

Mr. George B.
Toma
Wells-Gardner Electronics Corporation
9500 West 55th Street
Suite A
McCook, Illinois 60525

Dear
George:

The
purpose of this letter is to memorialize our telephone conversation of yesterday afternoon with respect to the maturity date on the obligations of Wells-Gardner Electronics
Corporation (the "Company") to Bank One, N.A., successor in interest to American National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago (the "Bank").

The
current maturity of the obligations of the Company to the Bank is August 31, 2003. Please be advised that the Bank is hereby formally committing to extend said maturity date
on the Company's revolver and term obligations to March 31, 2004. All other existing terms, conditions and covenants of the existing loan and security agreement shall remain in effect.

Should
you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.

Sincerely,

|/s/GERARD P. BROSNANGerard P. Brosnan
First Vice President |  |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL

- TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 19a0217n.06
No. 18

- 3708 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JESUS CARO LOPEZ, Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

B efore : SUHRHEINRICH , THAPAR, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM. The district court approved an application pursuant to Title III for the interception of wire and electronic communications from two cell phones suspected of being used in a drug trafficking organization. The interception led to the indictmen t of Jesus Caro Lopez and twelve co

- defendants on a variety of drug trafficking charges. Caro Lopez moved to suppress the evidence collected through the wiretaps; he also moved for a Franks hearing. See Franks v. Delaware , 438 U.S. 154 (1978). The distr ict court denied his motion and his request for a hearing. Caro Lopez then entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, two counts of distribution of methamphetamine, one

co unt of conspiracy to commit money laundering, and one count of use of a communication facility in a felony related to controlled substances. His plea reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of the suppression motion.No. 18

- 3708 , United States v. Lopez

- 2

-

On appeal, Caro Lop ez claims that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress because the warrant affidavit neither established probable cause to support the Title III wiretap applications nor complied with Title III’s necessity doctrine

. S ee 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (3)(c). He also claims the district court erred by denying his request for a Franks hearing. In a well

- reasoned opinion, the district court ably summarized the ninety

- one - page warrant affidavit and demonstrated why that affidavit both established probable cause and comported with the necessity doctrine. The district court also explained that , although one statement in the warrant affidavit was inaccurate, Caro Lopez had failed for two reasons to establish his entitlement to a Franks hearing . Firs t , he had failed to meet the “heavy burden” of making “a substantial preliminary showing” that the statement was either intentionally false or made in reckless disregard
of the truth

. United States v. Stewart , 306 F.3d 295, 304

– 05 (6th Cir. 2002) . S econd , he had not demonstrated that, without the inaccurate statement, the Title III order would not have issued. Franks , 438 U.S. at 155

– 56. After carefully reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court
has determined that the district court’s judgment should be affirmed. The district court’s opinion carefully and correctly states the facts and the governing law and explains its reasoning , with which
we agree . No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion. We , therefore, AFFIRM the judgment for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion and order dated March 13, 2018

.
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to RegistrationStatement No. 333-176635 on Form N-1A of our report dated December 17, 2014, relating to the financial statements and financialhighlights of the Capital Group Emerging Markets Total Opportunities Fund appearing in the Statement of Additional Information,which is part of such Registration Statement, and to the references to us under the headings “Financial highlights”in the Prospectus and “Independent registered public accounting firm” in the Statement of Additional Information, whichare part of such Registration Statement.

 

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Costa Mesa, California

December 29, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of Zale Corporation, certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2008, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Zale Corporation at the dates and for the
periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other
purpose.

This 26th day of September, 2008

By:

/s/ Neal L. GoldbergNeal L. Goldberg
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer of the registrant)


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jackson E. Reasor, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ Jackson E. Reasor                
|                        |  | Jackson E. Reasor                    
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



The following companies are subsidiaries of Zale Corporation:

         Zale Delaware, Inc.
         Zale International, Inc.
         Zale Canada Finance, Inc.


The following companies are subsidiaries of Zale Delaware, Inc.:

         Zale Puerto Rico, Inc.
         Dobbins Jewelers, Inc.
         Jewelers Financial Services, Inc.
         Zale Life Insurance Company
         Zale Indemnity Company
         Jewel Re-Insurance Ltd.
         Zale Employees Child Care Association, Inc.
         Jewelers Credit Corporation
         TXDC, LP
         DDCC, Inc.

The following company is a subsidiary of Zale International, Inc.:

         Zale Canada Company
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50602

Conference Calendar

 

DEREK LEN BOUNDS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ADOLPH THOMAS, officer, Hondo prison;

JOSEPH LAUGHLIN, Officer, Hondo prison,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-94-CV-281

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Derek Bounds, #644236, appeals from the judgment rendered

following a jury verdict in favor of the defendants in his civil

rights complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because

he does not raise any issue appropriate to the posture of this

case, the issues are deemed abandoned. See Yohey v. Collins, 985

F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). With no appealable issue before
No. 95-50602

- 2 -

the court, Bounds’ appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. We caution

Bounds that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on

his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Bounds is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

Bounds’ two motions requesting that he be transferred from

the Darrington Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division, are DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARK DAVID BREAKIRON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 118 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Arbitron Inc. 2010 Board of Director Compensation
  Annual Retainer Fee
    
    $30,000Independent Chairman of the Board
Additional Annual Retainer
    
    $85,000Committee Chair Retainer
    
    Audit Committee: $20,000Technology Strategy Committee:$20,000Other Committees: $10,000Board Meeting Fees (In person or by telephone)
    
    $1,500Committee Meeting Fees (In person)
    
    $1,500Committee Meeting Fees (By telephone)
    
    $750Initial Deferred Stock Unit Award
    
    Each newly elected non-employee
director will receive a
one-time grant of 4,500
deferred stock units, which
deferred stock units will vest
in three equal installments of
1,500 deferred stock units over
a three-year period and will be
payable no sooner than six
months following the directors
termination of service as a
director of the Company.Annual Deferred Stock Unit Awards
    
    Beginning the year after
initial election to the board
of directors, each continuing
non-employee director will
receive an annual grant of
$100,000 worth of deferred
stock units, which deferred
stock units will vest in three
equal installments over a
three-year period and will be
payable no sooner than six
months following the directors
termination of service as a
director of the Company.
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1









March 5, 2009




Mr. David Dyer

President and Chief Executive Officer

Chico’s FAS, Inc.

11215 Metro Parkway

Fort Myers, FL 33966




Re: Amendment to Employment Agreement




Dear Dave:




As discussed and approved at the February 24, 2009 Board meeting, the Performance Shares portion of
your Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Company is amended, in its entirety, as
follows:



PERFORMANCE SHARES




The opportunity to earn shares of the Company’s common stock, contingent upon the achievement of
the return on net asset goals consistent with the Company’s 2009 Management Bonus Plan over a 1
year period. The target number of shares is 100,000 with a range of 0 — 133,333 shares depending
on the level of achievement of the performance measures and goals over the stated period. One
hundred percent (100%) of all shares earned, if any, shall vest
3 years from the date of grant.
The details of your performance share award shall be set forth in detail in a separate grant
certificate.



Other than as set forth above, the remaining terms of your Agreement with us remain the same.



Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. Please indicate your acceptance of this change
to your Agreement by signing where indicated and returning this letter to me.








AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:






	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	/s/
David F. Dyer
 	 
	David F. Dyer 	 
	 	 
	 






 March 6,
2009

Date