alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 947.

No. 948.

#### Pearson, Post Commanding Officer, *v.*United States ex rel. Horowitz; and Pearson, Post Commanding Officer, *v.*United States ex rel. Samuels.

See *post,*p. 830.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the "Company") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies that:

          (i)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated as of this 8th day of November 2006.


                                        /s/ Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                        Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at November 2, 1996 (Unaudited)
and the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Thirty-Nine Weeks ended
November 2, 1996 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                       8,315,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,232,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 35,148,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,510,500
<PP&E>                                      50,032,500
<DEPRECIATION>                            (16,967,100)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              95,353,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,457,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    38,269,100
<OTHER-SE>                                (22,949,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                95,353,500
<SALES>                                    136,312,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           136,312,400
<CGS>                                       90,845,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               90,845,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            48,078,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,746,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,746,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,746,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.53)
        

</TABLE>
No. 1169.

#### Davis *v.*Indiana.

May 27, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana denied.
Exhibit 32.1

OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric
Cooperative (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jackson E. Reasor, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2006



/s/JACKSON E. REASORJackson E. ReasorPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




23
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **3 -**  **6 1**  **90**

HARVEY PATRICK SHORT , P etitioner

- Appell ant ,

v. DEBRA K. SAUERS , Respondent

- Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Charleston

. John T. Copenhaver, Jr. , District Judge. ( 2 :12

- cv - 0 6254 )

Submitted : May 30 , 2013 Decided: June 5, 2013
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

. Harvey Patrick Short , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Harvey Patrick Short seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabilit y. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sa tisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 5 29 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Short has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and le gal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Robert Copple

Robert CoppleChief Financial Officer
  /s/ Carol Waldman

Name: Carol WaldmanTitle: Notary Public
 06/07/08
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000069809-MAR-201208:25 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     financial statements for the three months ended August 31, 1998 and is 
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
                       
       
<S>                             <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,044,228
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,038,503
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                      0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                    0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             75,396,785
<PP&E>                                          16,503,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,836,470
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<PAYABLES>                                      19,270,115
<REPOS-SOLD>                                             0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                      0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                               7,860,537
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           143,432
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,361,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,836,470
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               13,765,576
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             2,009,020
<COMMISSIONS>                                   12,752,094
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                            0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                      894,660
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 116,768
<COMPENSATION>                                  13,122,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,026,913)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      (1,335,323)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,335,323)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.09)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-3 No. 333-35101, Form S-3 No. 033-62639, Form S-4No. 333-144332, Form S-4No. 333-136854, and Form S-4 No. 333-104474)of Northwest Pipeline GP and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 26,2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Northwest Pipeline GPincluded in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPHouston, Texas
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting;
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Jay LarkinJay LarkinPresident and Interim Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 99

To designate ‘‘God Bless America’’ as the national hymn of the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate ‘‘God Bless America’’ as the national hymn 

of the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL HYMN. 

4 The composition consisting of the words and music 

5 known as ‘‘God Bless America’’ is designated as the na6 tional hymn of the United States.

Æ
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: January 11, 2007 | Signed:  /s/  Daniel R. McDonell           
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|                       | Daniel R. McDonell,
Chief Financial Officer
1

Filed 7/11/24 P. v. Chaira CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MANUEL CHAIRA, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

E082732

(Super.Ct.No. RIF151153 ) 

OPINION

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. John D. Molloy, Judge.

Dismissed.

Benjamin Kington, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant.

No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
2

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Manuel Chaira, Jr. appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for 

resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable 

issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo).

On May 9, 2024, we notified defendant: (1) counsel filed a brief indicating no 

arguable issues had been identified; (2) as a case arising from an order denying 

postconviction relief, this court was not required to conduct an independent review of the 

record, but we could do so in our discretion; and (3) in accordance with the procedures

set forth in Delgadillo, he had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief raising any 

argument he wanted this court to consider. We also notified defendant that if we did not 

receive a brief within that 30-day period, we may dismiss the appeal as abandoned. More 

than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. We 

consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed. (Delgadillo, 

supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

We concur: 

CODRINGTON

Acting P. J.

MENETREZ

J.

FIELDS

J.
Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Shareholders and the Board of Directors
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement Nos.
33-42278  and  33-50039 on Form S-8 of  Winn-Dixie  Stores,  Inc. of our reports
dated July 27, 1998,  relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Winn-Dixie
Stores Inc.  and  subsidiaries  as of June 24, 1998 and June 25,  1997;  and the
related  consolidated  statements of earnings,  shareholders'  equity,  and cash
flows and related  consolidated  financial  statement  schedule  for each of the
years in the three year period ended June 24, 1998,  which reports appear in the
June 24, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.



                                                     KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Jacksonville, Florida
August 6, 1998





<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the "Company") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies that:

          (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated as of this 8th day of August 2006.


                                        /s/ Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Timothy R. Schwertfeger
                                        Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6526
JOHNNY LEE ROBBINS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN FREEMAN; J. V. TURLINGTON, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-96-762-5-F3) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 16, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Lee Robbins, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motionfor leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robbins v. Freeman , No. CA-96-762-5-F3 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 1997). Further, we deny Appellant's motion for transcripts at government expense and his motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                          85,024
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  286,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    782,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,283,003
<PP&E>                                       7,391,072
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,616,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,165,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          855,226
<BONDS>                                      1,961,265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                        15,724
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,333,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,165,267
<SALES>                                      3,515,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,515,288
<CGS>                                        2,019,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,019,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,634,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,170,110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,170,110)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,170,110)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>