alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                     388,792
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            3,035,453
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                              3,798,395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         7,385,462
<PP&E>                                   1,399,993
<DEPRECIATION>                             775,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           9,077,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    3,095,668
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                 1,795,157
<OTHER-SE>                               4,186,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             9,077,400
<SALES>                                 17,435,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        17,435,133
<CGS>                                   14,917,098
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           16,605,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           149,439
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          73,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            680,453
<INCOME-TAX>                               309,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        402,317
<DISCONTINUED>                            (93,317)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               371,453
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.35


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21 - List of Subsidiaries


                                                        Jurisdiction of
                                                        ---------------
                                                         Incorporation
                                                         -------------

         Wilshire Oil of Canada, Ltd.                   Alberta, Canada
         Calgary, Alberta, Canada

         San Francisco Oil                              State of California

         Rockland Resources                             State of Oklahoma

         Britalta Venezolano, Ltd.                      Alberta, Canada
         Calgary, Alberta, Canada

         Sunrise Ridge Holding, Inc.                    State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         Sunrise Ridge, L. L. C.                        State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         Biltmore Club Holding, Inc.                    State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         Biltmore Club Apartments, L. L. C.             State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         350 Pleasant Valley  Corp                      State of New Jersey
         Jersey City, NJ

         Global Equities Management Corp.               State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         Wellington Apartments, L.L.C.                  State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         Van Buren, L.L.C.                              State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Alan StockAlan StockChief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert Copple, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cinemark USA,
Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the
registrant and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date:
November 10, 2004 CINEMARK USA, INC. By:
    
    /s/Robert CoppleRobert CoppleChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7624

LEE WAYNE HUNT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STEPHEN COLLINS; R. ANDERSON; PATRICIA L.

CHAVIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-619-5-BO)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: March 7, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee Wayne Hunt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lee Wayne Hunt, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.

1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1999) and

denying his motion to amend or reconsider. Hunt also has moved

this court to issue a certificate of probable cause to appeal. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny the motion for

probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See Hunt v. Collins, No. CA-99-619-5-BO

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 21 & Nov. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Restated Certificate of Trust



 Exhibit 4.6 
 RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF 
 LINCOLN NATIONAL CAPITAL VIII  
 This Restated Certificate of Trust of Lincoln National Capital VIII (the “Trust’) is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as
trustee, to amend and restate the original Certificate of Trust of the Trust which was filed on March 18, 2002 (the “Original Certificate of Trust”) with the Secretary of the State of Delaware under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act
(12 Delaware Code § 3801 et seq.) (the “Act”). 
 The Original Certificate of Trust is hereby amended and restated
in its entirety to read as follows: 
 1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is Lincoln National Capital VIII.

 2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of
Delaware are BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Restated Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(2) of the Act. 
  

			
	 BNY MELLON TRUST OF DELAWARE,
 not in its
individual capacity but solely as trustee

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kristine K. Gullo

	Name:	 	Kristine K. Gullo
	Title:	 	Vice President
Exhibit 32(b)



Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and accompanies the annual report
on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended January 2, 2005 of Wendys International, Inc. (the Issuer).



I, Kerrii B. Anderson, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



(i) the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and



(ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



Dated: April 1, 2005



/s/ KERRII B. ANDERSONName: Kerrii B. Anderson




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wendys International, Inc. and will be retained by Wendys International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
To: Honorable aaire C. Cecchi Page 2 of 3 2011-12-20 21:55:29 (GMT) 

Joel S. Cohe~ PC 

128Mott Street, Suite 706 

New York, NY 10013 

Tel: 212-571-8899 

Fax: 212-608-0505 

... ~mail;j~~~q99@gmail.com ···--.. . . .•.. .. . · .. ···-... ···· 

December 20, 2011 

The Honorable Claire C. Cecchi 

United States District Judge 

Martin Luther King Building 

& U.S. Courthouse 

50 Walnut Street Room 4015 

Newark, NJ 07101 

Re: United States v. Mou Chor Tung 

Docket No. 11 CR 517;..CCC 

Dear Judge Cecchi: 

From: joel cohen 

On December 12 Your Honor granted the Government's Rule 35{a) 

Motion and re-sentenced Mou Chor Tung to a term of 42 months probation. 

Mr. Tung met with his Probation Officer, USPO Monica Martin earlier today. 

Officer Martin advised him that generally probationers are not allowed to 

leave the state of New Jersey during their first 60 days of supervision. As the 

Court may recall my client has elderly parents that reside in Chinatown in 

Manhattan. He visits them at least once a week, and accompanies them to 

physicians and other appointments as neither ofthem speaks English. While 

on pre-trial release his bail limits permitted to visit them. His present 

inability to travclto M:~nh9-ttan Will create a substantial hardship for th.em. ·~ ~ ''· ····- . . '· 

rve spoken with USPO Martin regarding this matter; she bas no 

objection to Mr. Tung being permitted to travel to New York but advised that 

it would require authorization by Your Honor. Prior to my conversation with 

her, in an abundance of caution, I also raised this issue with AUSA Aaron 

Mendelsohn. Mr. Mendelsohn graciously advised that the Government also 

has no objection to the granting of this request. 

Case 2:11-cr-00517-CCC Document 13 Filed 12/22/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 94
To: Honorable Oaire C. Cecchi Page 3 of 3 2011-12-20 21:55:29 (GMT) 

The Honorable Claire C. Cecchi 

United States District Judge 

Re: U.S. v. Mou Chor Tung 

Page two 

From: joel cohen 

I therefor respectfully request that you grant Mr. Tung~s request to 

expand his travel limits during the first 60 days of probation supervision to 

include New York City by So Ordering this letter. Thank you. 

cc: USPO Monica Martin 

AUSA Aaron Mendelsohn 

The abpye application i~ h~reby: 

Granted: / ~ ~- • ~ 

Denied: ____ _ 

Claire C. Cecchi 

United States District Judge 

Very truly yours, 

D.···~ 

1 S. Cohen QC6998) 

Case 2:11-cr-00517-CCC Document 13 Filed 12/22/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 95
EXHIBIT 32.1    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                OFFICER


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The  undersigned,  the  Principal  Executive  Officer  (CEO)  and the  Principal
Financial  Officer (CFO) of Viking  Capital  Group,  Inc. (the  "Company")  each
hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

         (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004,  filed on the date hereof with the  Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  August 12, 2004       /s/ William J. Fossen
                              ---------------------
                              William J. Fossen
                              Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 12, 2004       /s/ Matthew W. Fossen
                              ---------------------
                              Matthew W. Fossen
                              Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 154 (Friday, August 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 37583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17018]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9034-6]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 07/31/2017 Through 08/04/2017
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.
EIS No. 20170150, Final Supplement, DOS, ND, Line 67 Expansion 
(previously known as the Alberta Clipper Pipeline), Contact: Mary D. 
Hassell 202-736-7428.
EIS No. 20170151, Draft, USFS, MN, School Trust Land Exchange, Comment 
Period Ends: 10/10/2017, Contact: Peter Taylor 218-626-4368.
EIS No. 20170152, Draft, BR, CA, San Luis Low Point Improvement 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 09/25/2017, Contact: Nicole Johnson 916-
978-5085.
EIS No. 20170153, Final, ARS, ID, U.S. Sheep Experimental Station 
Grazing and Associated Activities Project, Review Period Ends: 09/11/
2017, Contact: Gary Mayo 202-260-9494.

    Dated: August 8, 2017.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2017-17018 Filed 8-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 12, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

135250 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

TAMARA CIARAMITARO, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC: 135250 

v CoA: 279388

 WCAC 06-0102 

GREEKTOWN CASINO, LLC and 

FAIRMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendant-Appellee 

and 

ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE 

of AMERICA, 

 Defendant. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, it appearing that an agreement to redeem liability in 

this case has been approved, the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with 

prejudice and without costs. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 12, 2007 

 Clerk
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 12

- 00072

- CR

BILLY JOE SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0518109

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Billy Joe Smith was on deferred adjudication community supervision for the offense of

aggravated sexual assault of a child. The State filed a motion for adjudication and revocation,

alleging Smith failed to pay fees, fines, and costs assessed as part of his supervision and that he

viola ted the terms and conditions of his supervision by being in the direct presence of or having

personal contact with children. The trial court found the allegations true

, adjudicated him guilty,

and sentenced him to life in prison.

Based on the reasoning and analysis in our opinion in cause number 06

- 1 2

- 00 0 6 5

- CR,

issued on even date herewith, we overrule Smith ’s points of error

.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment and sentence.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: January 10, 2013

Date Decided: January 23

, 2013

Do Not Publish
The AAL Mutual Funds

**Supplement dated February 1, 2001**

**The information below supplementsthe information contained in The AAL Mutual Funds Institutional SharesProspectus dated July 1, 2000, as amended July 3, 2000. This supplement updatescertain information contained in your prospectus. This supplement should be readwith each prospectus.**

Effective February 10,2001, PFPC, Inc. will perform the duties of transfer agent for The AAL MutualFunds. All prospectus references to Firstar Mutual Fund Services, LLC in“Shareholder Information” are hereby amended to read PFPC, Inc. 

**"How To Purchase (Buy) Shares"** is amended to include:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. FER NANDO ZAVALA-JAC OB O, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-50523

D.C . No. 3:11-c r-04273-IEG M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Irm a E. Gonz a le z , Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 10, 2014 ** B e fore : PREGER SON, LEAVY, a n d M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s . Fe rnando Za

v a la -Ja c obo a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the six-m onth c onse c utive se nte nc e im pose d upon re v oc ation of supe rvise d re le a se . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED MAR 13 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Zava la -Ja c obo c onte nds tha t the distric t c ourt proc e dura lly e rre d by fa iling to e xpla in a de quate ly

why it im

pose d the se nte nc e it did, why it de c line d

to gra nt a gre ate r downwa

rd va ria nc e , a nd why it wa s not pe rsua de d by

his se nte n c ing argum e nts. W e re vie w for pla i n e rror, se eUnite d State s v . Miqbe l , 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th C ir. 2006), a

nd find none . The distric t c ourt e xpla ine d the se nte nc e suffic i e ntly

to pe rm it m e aningful a

ppe lla te re vie w. S

e e Unite d State s v . C arty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th C ir. 2008) (e n ba nc ). Zava la -Ja c obo a lso c o nte nds tha t the se nte nc e is substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble be c a use it is punitive , is gre ate r tha n ne c e ssa ry to a c c o m plish the goa ls of se nte nc ing, a

n d doe s not a c c ount for mitiga t ing fa c tors. W e re v ie w for a buse of disc re tion, se eGall v
. Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007), a n d find none . The se nte nc e is substa

ntive ly re a sona ble in light of the

18 U.S.C . § 3583(e ) se nte nc ing fa c t ors a n d the tota lity

of the c irc um s ta

nc e s, inc luding Za

va la -Ja c obo’ s c rim ina l history an d bre a c h of trust. Se e U.S.S.G. § 7B 1.3(f); Miqbe l , 444 F.3d a t 1181-82. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 5 0 5 2 3 2