alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Shareholder Meeting Results (unaudited)

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Churchill Tax-Free Fund of
Kentucky (the "Fund") was held on April 28, 2006.  The holders of
shares representing 71% of the total net asset value of the shares
entitled to vote were present in person or by proxy.  At the meeting,
the following matters were voted upon and approved by the shareholders
(the resulting votes are presented below).

1.     To elect Trustees.

					Number of Votes:

	Trustee				For			Withheld

	Thomas A. Christopher		$202,300,378	$   926,498
	Diana P. Herrmann			$202,197,486	$1,029,390
	Theodore T. Mason			$201,945,708	$1,281,168
	Anne J. Mills			$202,121,778	$1,105,098
	William J. Nightingale		$202,103,256	$1,123,620
	James R. Ramsey			$202,077,363	$1,149,513

2. To ratify the selection of Tait Weller & Baker LLP as the Fund's
3. independent registered accounting firm.

					Number of Votes:

			For			Against		Abstain
			$200,966,155	$247,128		$2,013,593
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 353 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 353

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent unjust and irrational 
                         criminal punishments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2015

  Mr. Paul (for himself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent unjust and irrational 
                         criminal punishments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice Safety Valve Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE A SENTENCE BELOW A STATUTORY MINIMUM.

    Section 3553 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) Authority To Impose a Sentence Below a Statutory Minimum To 
Prevent an Unjust Sentence.--
            ``(1) General rule.--Notwithstanding any provision of law 
        other than this subsection, the court may impose a sentence 
        below a statutory minimum if the court finds that it is 
        necessary to do so in order to avoid violating the requirements 
        of subsection (a).
            ``(2) Court to give parties notice.--Before imposing a 
        sentence under paragraph (1), the court shall give the parties 
        reasonable notice of the court's intent to do so and an 
        opportunity to respond.
            ``(3) Statement in writing of factors.--The court shall 
        state, in the written statement of reasons, the factors under 
        subsection (a) that require imposition of a sentence below the 
        statutory minimum.
            ``(4) Appeal rights not limited.--This subsection does not 
        limit any right to appeal that would otherwise exist in its 
        absence.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of The Ziegler Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John J.
Mulherin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John J. Mulherin
-----------------------------------
John J. Mulherin
Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Ziegler Companies, Inc. and will be retained by The Ziegler
Companies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                          $ 13,919,000
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                     26,471,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                       48,539,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  92,041,000
<PP&E>                           120,753,000
<DEPRECIATION>                    52,503,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   162,440,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             31,410,000
<BONDS>                                    0
<COMMON>                           6,989,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                        97,367,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     162,440,000
<SALES>                          418,058,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 103,123,000
<CGS>                            318,069,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     83,884,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  80,303,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     662,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 2,919,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    6,498,000
<INCOME-TAX>                       2,763,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                       3,735,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                9
<MULTIPLIER>             1000
       
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                 12410
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                 23858
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                       0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            302312
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                 0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                   0
<LOANS>                                1017641
<ALLOWANCE>                            5458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1404263
<DEPOSITS>                             1020923
<SHORT-TERM>                           132164
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                    27878
<LONG-TERM>                            0
<COMMON>                               54
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                             125040
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>         1404263
<INTEREST-LOAN>                        35250
<INTEREST-INVEST>                      6447
<INTEREST-OTHER>                       493
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                       42190
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                     20587
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     25780
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                  16410
<LOAN-LOSSES>                          0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                        16691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        6626
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                           4065
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                         2.33
<LOANS-NON>                            1627
<LOANS-PAST>                           0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                       5478
<CHARGE-OFFS>                          22
<RECOVERIES>                           2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                      5458
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                   525
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                4933
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamar TURNER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7652.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.

Jamar Turner, Appellant Pro Se. William A. Brafford, David Alan Brown, Sr., Cortney Escaravage, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*267PER CURIAM:

Jamar Turner appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to receive credit for jail time. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court without prejudice to Turner’s right to seek relief from the Bureau of Prisons or by a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2000 *&*Supp.2012) petition. *United States v. Turner,*No. 3:08-cr-00015-RJC-8 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
AMERICAN MUTUAL FUND, INC.
       333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California  90071
                        (213) 486-9200
 
January 5, 1998
 
Document Control
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Re:  American Mutual Fund, Inc.
     File Nos. 2-10607 and 811-572
                                                                             
Gentlemen:
 
     Enclosed for filing is the above-referenced Registrant's current
definitive Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.  There have been
no changes from the Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 103 under the
Securities Act of 1933 and Amendment No. 23 under the Investment Company Act of
1940 filed electronically on December 30, 1997.  This material is filed
pursuant to the requirements of Reg.230.497 under the Securities Act of 1933.  
   
Sincerely,
 
Vincent P. Corti
 
Enclosures
cc:  Mr. Frank Dalton
     Mr. Bric Barrientos 
     (Division of Investment Management)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 940

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the foreign 

tax credit not be redetermined with respect to refunds of unlawful foreign 

taxes to taxpayers who successfully challenge those taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2003

Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that the foreign tax credit not be redetermined with 

respect to refunds of unlawful foreign taxes to taxpayers 

who successfully challenge those taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreign Tax Credit 

5 Revenue Enhancement Act of 2003’’.
2

•HR 940 IH 

1 SEC. 2. FOREIGN TAX CREDIT NOT REDETERMINED FOR 

2 TAXPAYER SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGING 

3 UNLAWFUL FOREIGN TAX. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 905 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to adjust6 ments to accrued taxes) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(6) EXCEPTION FOR TAXPAYERS SUCCESS9 FULLY CHALLENGING UNLAWFUL TAXES.—Para10 graph (1) shall not apply to any taxpayer to whom 

11 a tax is refunded in whole or in part if, pursuant to 

12 an action brought by the taxpayer, such refund re13 sults from a determination by a court of competent 

14 jurisdiction in the country with respect to which 

15 such tax was imposed that such tax is unlawful.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 this section shall apply to refunds received in taxable years 

18 beginning after December 31, 2002.

Æ
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0016

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DONALD GARZA,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Peter B. Ohman , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 1 2023

03/01/2023
Case Number: DA 21-0016
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000868 29-AUG-2014 10:04 AM
null

483.9999
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002 This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q)
for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 of Cinemark USA, Inc. (the Issuer). I, Lee Roy Mitchell, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that to the
best of my knowledge:  (i)
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer. Dated: May 12, 2004 /s/ Lee Roy Mitchell  
 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12th day of May 2004. /s/ Carol Waldman    My commission expires: 06/07/04 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. ■ — •, original.

#### Watson, Attorney General, *v.*Bowles, Economic Stabilization Director, et al.

June 10, 1946.

*J. Tom Watson,*Attorney General of Florida, and *Lamar Warren,*Assistant Attorney General, for complainant.

The motion for leave to file bill of complaint is denied.
1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________

No. 02-1888

________________

United States of America,

Appellee,

v.

Glen Jackson,

Appellant.

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

[PUBLISHED]

________________

Submitted: November 5, 2002

 Filed: November 18, 2002

________________

Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, BEAM and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

________________

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Glen Jackson guilty of aiding and abetting the deprivation of a

person's rights under color of law, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 242. The

district court1

 sentenced him to 108 months in prison and three years of supervised

release. On appeal, Jackson argues that the district court should not have allowed the

prosecutor to cross-examine him about the facts relating to his prior conviction in
2

Arkansas state court for attempted capital murder. For the reasons discussed below,

we affirm the judgment of the district court.

Jackson was convicted of the prior offense approximately two years before he

stood trial on the instant offense. On direct examination, after acknowledging his

conviction, Jackson asserted that the jury had sentenced him to the statutory minimum

because "[t]here's no self-defense law in Arkansas." Over Jackson's objection, the

district court allowed the prosecutor to cross-examine him about evidence presented

at the attempted murder trial that was inconsistent with the implication that Jackson

had acted in self-defense: after an argument with the victim, Jackson had followed

him in his car, stopped him, shot him, and continued to shoot him after he fell to the

ground. (Trial Tr. at 716-20.)

Jackson argues on appeal that the district court admitted this testimony under

Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) (dealing with the admission of evidence of prior

crimes to prove motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity,

or absence of mistake or accident) and that it thereby erred. We conclude that this

argument is misplaced because the district court allowed the cross-examination for

the purpose of impeaching Jackson's credibility, as authorized by Federal Rules of

Evidence 608 and 609. We find no abuse of discretion. See United States v.

Valencia, 61 F.3d 616, 618 (8th Cir. 1995) (when the defendant minimizes his guilt

in discussing a prior conviction on direct examination, the district court does not

abuse its discretion in allowing a more extensive cross-examination into the facts

underlying the conviction to impeach the defendant's credibility).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
3

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1787

NEAL C. MORRISON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LARRYMORE ORGANIZATION, INC.,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, Senior District Judge. (2:20-cv-00519-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 20, 2023

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Neal C. Morrison, Appellant Pro Se. Maurice Scott Fisher, Jr., HARMAN CLAYTOR 

CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1787 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/20/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Neal C. Morrison appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint and 

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Morrison v. Larrymore Org., Inc., No. 2:20-cv-00519-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Jan. 28 & June 

22, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1787 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/20/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 30, 2014

NO. 03-14-00253-CV

PKWF GP, LLC, Appellant

v.

Aqua Land Lakeway Medical Development, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED ON APPELLEE’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order of severance signed by the trial court on December 20, 2013, 

finalizing an earlier default judgment. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and 

having reviewed the record, the Court agrees that the appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, the 

Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to 

this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AS OF AND FOR
THE PERIODS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                      10,254,366
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               64,655,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            84,099,315
<PP&E>                                         577,058
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,172,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             145,488,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       72,950,510
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,614
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,599,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               145,488,022
<SALES>                                    489,192,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           502,979,543
<CGS>                                      488,045,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,127,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,477,966
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,808,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,669,966
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              5,552,813
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,222,779
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 185

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 9, 2003.

Resolved, That House Resolution 163 (agreed to March

26, 2003) is amended by striking ‘‘April 11, 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘May 9, 2003’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-KSB FOR
OPHTHALMIC  IMAGING  SYSTEMS  FOR THE  PERIOD  ENDED  NOVEMBER  30,  2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                AUG-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                     NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                              95,284
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                      146,229
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                        651,347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   934,114
<PP&E>                           1,338,137
<DEPRECIATION>                  (1,127,469)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   1,157,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    0
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    12,630,604
<SALES>                            734,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   734,189
<CGS>                              641,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      641,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   916,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  36,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (859,654)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (859,654)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     62,836
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                      (859,654)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.00)


</TABLE>