alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,830,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,088,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,918,000
<PP&E>                                      78,502,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,420,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,789,000
<BONDS>                                     81,138,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,453,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,420,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,397,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,625,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                772,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    98,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   674,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matritech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A.
Sandberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Matritech,
Inc. and will be retained by Matritech, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request. /s/ Richard A. Sandberg Richard A. Sandberg
Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1999
<CASH>                                            4796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1050
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 11282
<PP&E>                                          132004
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  185014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            24866
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         35000
<OTHER-SE>                                        2067
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    185014
<SALES>                                         192933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                200565
<CGS>                                           158064
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   158064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3113
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1852
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1261
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1261
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
   
                    U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                 FORM 10-QSB/A
    
 
                   Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended August 31, 1997
 
Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
 
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____________ TO____________
 
Commission File Number 0-20936
 
                                DIVERSIFAX, INC.
          -----------------------------------------------------------------
          (Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in its Charter)
 
        Delaware                                           13-3637458
   -------------------------------                      -------------------
   (State or other jurisdiction of)                     (I.R.S. employer 
   incorporation or organization)                        Identification No.)


   39 Stringham Avenue, Valley Stream, New York                11580 
   --------------------------------------------             ----------
   (Address of principal executive office)                  (Zip Code)

                                                      Issuer's telephone number:
                                                      (516) 872-0650
                                                      --------------
 
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by 
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for 
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), 
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
 
                                    YES  X      NO
                                        ---       ---
 
There were 14,826,373 shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock, par 
value $.001 per share, as of October 10, 1997.


<PAGE>


                                  SIGNATURES

     In accordance with section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the 
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, 
thereunto duly authorized.

                                       DIVERSIFAX, INC.

                                       /s/ Irwin A. Horowitz
                                       ---------------------------
Date: October 15th, 1997               Irwin A. Horowitz
                                       Chairman of the Board of
                                       Directors, President and Principal
                                       Financial Officer
                                       (Chief Executive Officer)
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 180

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Correctional Officers and Employees Week’’ and honoring the service of correctional officers and 

employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 7, 2003

Mr. STRICKLAND (for himself, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. SWEENEY, and Mr. GREEN

of Wisconsin) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Correctional 

Officers and Employees Week’’ and honoring the service 

of correctional officers and employees.

Whereas the operation of correctional facilities represents a 

crucial component of the criminal justice system of the 

United States; 

Whereas correctional personnel play a vital role in protecting 

the rights of the public to be safeguarded from criminal 

activity; 

Whereas correctional personnel are responsible for the care, 

custody, and dignity of the human beings charged to 

their care; 
2

•HRES 180 IH 

Whereas correctional personnel work under demanding circumstances and face danger in their daily work lives; and 

Whereas S. Res. 24 of the 108th Congress, as agreed to on 

March 12, 2003, designates the week beginning May 4, 

2003, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers and Employees 

Week’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘National 

3 Correctional Officers and Employees Week’’; and 

4 (2) honors all correctional officers and employ5 ees for their service to their communities, States, 

6 and the Nation.

Æ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,980-01

EX PARTE OTIS MALLETT, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1164940-A IN THE 338 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. Under Article

11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a district clerk is required to forward to this Court,

among other things, “the application, any answers filed, any motions filed, transcripts of all

depositions and hearings, any affidavits, and any other matters such as official records used by the

court in resolving issues of fact.” Id. at § 3(d); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). The record

forwarded to this Court appears, however, to be incomplete. The habeas record in the companion

case, Harris County Cause number 1248132-A, includes an amended habeas application form and

an amended memorandum in support which was filed on April 30, 2013. That amended application
2

listed both Harris County cause numbers, but was apparently only filed in one case. The amended

application added a ground of actual innocence to the grounds raised in the initial application. The

amended application and memorandum is not included in the record for this cause.

The district clerk shall either forward to this Court the amended application and amended

memorandum in support, or certify in writing that these documents are not part of the record. The

district clerk shall comply with this order within ten days from the date of this order.

Filed: March 12, 2020

Do not publish
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                              AEROSONIC CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aerosonic Corporation (the
"Company") for the period ending January 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary E. Colbert,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

October 31, 2003
        --

/s/ GARY E. COLBERT
-----------------------
Gary E. Colbert
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-03-142-CV

JAMYE YODER 	APPELLANT

	V.

MARK YODER	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF PARKER COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On May 30, 2003, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by rule 35.3(a)(2).  TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provided this court with proof of payment.  

	Because appellant still has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.   Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM 		

PANEL D:	DAY, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 31, 2003
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 30, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00225

- CR

Arturo Rosales aka Artemio Rosales

- AYALA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court N o. 2013CR10431

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s motion for access to the appellate record is granted. We order th e c lerk of

this court to send appellant, pro se, a copy of the record. We further order appellant’s pro se

brief is due November 16, 2015

. Appellant is advised that no extensions of time to file the pro

se brief will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I h ave hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of September , 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 565 

To reduce the operation and maintenance costs associated with the Federal 

fleet by encouraging the use of remanufactured parts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2015 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To reduce the operation and maintenance costs associated 

with the Federal fleet by encouraging the use of remanufactured parts, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Vehicle Repair 

5 Cost Savings Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that, in March 2013, the Government 

8 Accountability Office issued a report that confirmed 

9 that— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 565 IS

1 (1) there are approximately 588,000 vehicles in 

2 the civilian Federal fleet; 

3 (2) Federal agencies spent approximately 

4 $975,000,000 on repair and maintenance of the 

5 Federal fleet in 2011; 

6 (3) remanufactured vehicle components, such as 

7 engines, starters, alternators, steering racks, and 

8 clutches, tend to be less expensive than comparable 

9 new replacement parts; and 

10 (4) the United States Postal Service and the 

11 Department of the Interior both informed the Gov12 ernment Accountability Office that the respective 

13 agencies rely on the use of remanufactured vehicle 

14 components to reduce costs. 

15 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

16 In this Act— 

17 (1) the term ‘‘Federal agency’’ has the meaning 

18 given that term in section 102 of title 40, United 

19 States Code; and 

20 (2) the term ‘‘remanufactured vehicle compo21 nent’’ means a vehicle component (including an en22 gine, transmission, alternator, starter, turbocharger, 

23 steering, or suspension component) that has been re24 turned to same-as-new, or better, condition and per25 formance by a standardized industrial process that 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 565 IS

1 incorporates technical specifications (including engi2 neering, quality, and testing standards) to yield fully 

3 warranted products. 

4 SEC. 4. REQUIREMENT TO USE REMANUFACTURED VEHI5 CLE COMPONENTS. 

6 The head of each Federal agency— 

7 (1) shall encourage the use of remanufactured 

8 vehicle components to maintain Federal vehicles, if 

9 using such components reduces the cost of maintain10 ing the Federal vehicles while maintaining quality; 

11 and 

12 (2) shall not encourage the use of remanufac13 tured vehicle components to maintain Federal vehi14 cles, if using such components— 

15 (A) does not reduce the cost of maintain16 ing Federal vehicles; 

17 (B) lowers the quality of vehicle perform18 ance, as determined by the employee of the 

19 Federal agency responsible for the repair deci20 sion; or 

21 (C) delays the return to service of a vehi22 cle. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mohammed Asad SAID, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-7490.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 28, 2008.

Mohammed Asad Said, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*533PER CURIAM:

Mohammed Asad Said seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ.P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 338, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Said has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Said’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. *United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to eases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Said’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
| Delaware                                            |   | 001-09614                |   | 51-0291762                        |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                                                |   |                     |   |                              |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)      |   | (Commission File Number) |   | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|                                                |   |                     |   |                              |
| 390 Interlocken CrescentBroomfield, Colorado        |   | 80021                    |   |                              |
|                                                |   |                     |   |                              |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)            |   | (Zip Code)               |   |                              |
|                                                |   |                     |   |                              |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code: |   |  (303) 404-1800     |   |                              |
|                                                |   |                     |   |                              |

|                                                                |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                |
| (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)  |

|                       |   | Vail Resorts, Inc.                                               |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Date: March 10, 2011 | By:    | /S/ JEFFREY W. JONES                                             |
|                       |   |                                                             |
|                       |   | Jeffrey W. Jones                                                 |
|                       |   | Co-President andChief Financial Officer(Duly Authorized Officer) |

| Exhibit No. | Description                                                                              |
|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                     |
| 99.1        | Press Release, dated March 10, 2011, announcing fiscal 2011 second quarter results. |