alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 155

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 925

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 20, 2003

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1859 South Ashland Avenue in Chicago, 

Illinois, as the ‘‘Cesar Chavez Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 1859 South Ashland Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, 

6 and known as the Pilsen Post Office, shall be known and 

7 designated as the ‘‘Cesar Chavez Post Office’’. 
2

•HR 925 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Cesar Chavez Post Office’’. 

Calendar No. 155

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 925

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States 

Postal Service located at 1859 South Ashland Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Cesar Chavez Post Office’’. 

JUNE 20, 2003

Reported without amendment
F ILED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS EL EV EN TH C IRC UIT Sep tember 1 9, 2008 T HOMA S K. KA HN CLERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 07- 1173 1

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 05-01280 CV -J-12-MCR NE W HA MPSH IRE IN DE MNI TYCO MPA NY , INC, Plaintiff-C ount erDe fendant-Appellee,
ve rs us D O NN ARE ID , a s P er sona l R ep re se ntativ e of the E state of

Jon athan M er lin o, de ce as ed , H E L EN KE A RN S, a s P er sona l R ep re se ntativ e of the E state of

E ri c Sc ott

K earn s, de ce as ed , De fendants-CounterCl ai m an ts- Appe llants .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the Mi ddl e D istri ct

of F lor ida

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (S ep te m be r 19, 200 8) Be fo re A N D E RS O N , BA RKE T T and H IL L , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:2

A ft er or al arg um en t and c ar ef

ul c onsi de ratio n, w e co nc lud e that the j udgm ent of the district court is due to b e af firm ed. W e have carefully review ed the r el ev an t F lor ida

c as e law , and h av e co m

pare d th e ins tant f

ac ts a ga ins t the f

ac ts in tho se cases. W e conclude that a rea sonable jury would have to conclude un der the facts of this case, and in ligh t of the Florida case law , that A nderson, Jr. had
m oved ou t of his parents’ hom e and wa s livin g apart in the duplex. T he fac t that he w as r ec ei vin g so m e fi nanc ia l su ppor t f ro m his pare nts is not

a lon e suf fi ci en t t o
m ak e h im a m em be r of th e fam il y

un de r th e p ol ic y

an d t he cas e la w. AFFIR MED.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 409 

To amend the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act to require 

the Secretary of Defense to inform the Attorney General of persons 

required to register as sex offenders. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mrs. MCCASKILL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Sex Offender Registration and Notification 

Act to require the Secretary of Defense to inform the 

Attorney General of persons required to register as sex 

offenders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Sex Offender 

5 Reporting Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 409 IS

1 SEC. 2. REGISTRATION OF SEX OFFENDERS RELEASED 

2 FROM MILITARY CORRECTIONS FACILITIES 

3 OR UPON CONVICTION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Sex Offender Registration 

5 and Notification Act is amended by inserting after section 

6 128 (42 U.S.C. 16928) the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 128A. REGISTRATION OF SEX OFFENDERS RELEASED 

8 FROM MILITARY CORRECTIONS FACILITIES 

9 OR UPON CONVICTION. 

10 ‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Attor11 ney General the information described in section 114 to 

12 be included in the National Sex Offender Registry regard13 ing persons— 

14 ‘‘(1)(A) released from military corrections facili15 ties; or 

16 ‘‘(B) convicted if the sentences adjudged by 

17 courts-martial under chapter 47 of title 10, United 

18 States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), 

19 do not include confinement; and 

20 ‘‘(2) required to register under this title.’’. 

21 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

22 The table of contents of the Adam Walsh Child Protection 

23 and Safety Act is amended by inserting after the item re24 lating to section 128 the following: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 409 IS

‘‘Sec. 128A. Registration of sex offenders released from military corrections facilities or upon conviction.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned executive officer of Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin, Inc.
(the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the
three months ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                          /s/ Douglas J. Timmerman
                          ------------------------------------------------------
                          Douglas J. Timmerman, Chairman of the Board, President
                          and Chief Executive Officer

February 12, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin, Inc. and
will be retained by Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       35
Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Shareholders and the Board of Directors
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.:



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement No.
333-52874 on form S-3 and Nos.  33-42278 and 33-50039 on Form S-8 of  Winn-Dixie
Stores,  Inc. of our reports dated August 7, 2002,  relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Winn-Dixie  Stores Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of June 26, 2002
and June  27,  2001  and the  related  consolidated  statements  of  operations,
shareholders'  equity,  and  cash  flows  and  related  consolidated   financial
statement schedule for each of the years in the three year period ended June 26,
2002,  which  reports  appear in the June 26, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.



                                                              KPMG LLP



Jacksonville, Florida
August 7, 2002
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00243-CR

EX PARTE RAYFORD SMITH

From the 85th District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-001621-CV-85

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rayford Smith appeals the trial court’s denial of his application for bond 

reduction. He complains that because the State was not ready to proceed on his Brazos 

County offenses more than 90 days from the date a detainer was placed on him by 

Brazos County while Smith was being held on other charges at the Milam County jail, 

he should be released on a personal recognizance bond. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ANN. art. 17.151, sec. 1 (West Supp. 2013). Acknowledging that case law from this 

Court is contrary to his position, see Ex parte Remeika, No. 10-09-00379-CR, 2010 Tex. 

App. LEXIS 2717, 5-6 (Tex. App.—Waco Apr. 14, 2010, pet. dism’d) (not designated for 
Ex parte Smith Page 2

publication) (holding that the ninety-day period for determining whether the State was 

ready for trial on the Walker County charge against defendant did not begin until 

defendant was transferred from Madison County jail to Walker County jail), Smith 

argues that we should revisit our holding in Remeika. We decline to do so. 

Accordingly, based on our decision in Remeika, we hold that that the ninety-day 

period for determining whether the State was ready for trial on the Brazos County 

charges against Smith did not begin when the detainer was placed on Smith at the 

Milam County jail but rather began when Smith was transferred from the Milam 

County jail to the Brazos County jail. Smith’s sole issue is overruled, and the trial 

court’s judgment is affirmed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed February 20, 2014

Do not publish

[CR25]
1

Filed 3/ 10 /16 P. v. Hamilton CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JODY LYNN HAMILTON,

Defendant and Appellant. C079113

(Super. Ct. No. CM022476)

Appointed counsel for defendant Jody Lynn Hamilton has filed an opening brief

that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine

whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d

436.) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to

defendant, we affirm the judgment.2

We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of

the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

In April 2005, defendant pleaded n o contest to grand theft, having stolen more

than $400 cash from her ailing mother. The trial court sentenced defendant to five years

of felony probation and ordered her to pay, among other fines and fees, $51,299.84 in

victim restitution to her mother, J uliann Panko.

In January 2015, the trial court granted defendant’s motion to reduce her

conviction to a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 17, subdivision (b), and dismissed

the charges under Penal Code section 1203.4.

In March 2015, the People mov ed to amend the restitution order “so that payment

is ordered to David Puchta, heir to actual victim, Juliann Panko, deceased.” Defendant

objected, arguing that she was also an heir and the criminal court lacked jurisdiction to

determine the victim’s succ essor. The trial court granted the People’s motion and

amended the restitution order as requested. Defendant appeals from that order.

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening

brief that sets forth the facts of t he case and requests this court to review the record and

determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( People v. Wende

, supra

,

25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental

brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have

elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant.

Having undertaken an examination o f the entire record, we find no arguable error

that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.3 DISPOSITION

The order amending the restitution order is affirmed.

BUTZ , J.

We concur:

HULL , Acting P. J.

DUARTE , J.
#### Dennis Michael GALLIPEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Linda MICKENS-HAM, Defendant-Appellee, and Jane Doe; Lexington County Detention Center; Officer Mack, Defendants.

No. 12-7508.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.

Dennis Michael Gallipeau, Appellant Pro Se. Evan Markus Gessner, Michael Stephen Pauley, Lide & Pauley, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Gallipeau appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we *259affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Gallipeau v. Mickens-Ham,*No. 3:09-cv-01883-TMC (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, INC.
       333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California  90071 
                       Telephone (213) 486-9200
                       Telecopier (213) 486-9217
 
 
Fellow Investors:
 
We are pleased to report that Capital Income Builder's March dividend will
result in a 3.5% increase in income for most shareholders, continuing the
fund's record of increasing income distributions in every quarter of its
lifetime. Similar to last year, the March 1998 dividend remains equal on a
per-share basis to the December 1997 payment of 48 cents. However, shareholders
who received the December dividend also received a capital gain distribution of
$1.61 per share, which was about 3.5% of the net asset value at the time. For
the vast majority of shareholders, who reinvest their distributions, the
capital gain distribution increased the number of their shares by 3.5%, and
that, in turn, increased their total March 1998 income payment by the same
percentage.
 
The 3.5% increase in income is the largest quarterly income increase in the
fund's history. For shareholders who reinvest their capital gain distributions,
their March 1998 income is 6.8% greater than that of March 1997. On the basis
of Board action today, the June dividend will increase by 0.5 cents to 48.5
cents a share, and that will provide a 1.0% increase in income over that
received in March 1998.
 
In the past, CIB has reported to you quarterly. With financial information
available from your adviser or the American Funds Web site at
www.americanfunds.com, the cost of producing quarterly reports no longer
appears justified. We will continue to provide annual and semi-annual reports
and, when warranted, special letters to shareholders.  
 
Cordially,
 
[/s/ Paul G. Haaga, Jr.]           [/s/ James B. Lovelace]
Paul G. Haaga, Jr.                 James B. Lovelace
Chairman of the Board              President of the Fund 
 
March 2, 1998
Exhibit 32.2



OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel M. Walker, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 16, 2005



/s/ DANIEL M. WALKERDaniel M. WalkerSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




24
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Written
      Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350**








Solely
      for the
      purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Integrys Energy Group, Inc.
      (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.










/s/
      Larry L.
      Weyers


Larry
      L.
      Weyers


President
      and Chief
      Executive Officer








/s/
      Joseph P.
      O'Leary


Joseph
      P.
      O'Leary


Senior
      Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer








Date:
      February 28,
      2007








This
      certification
      accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Integrys Energy Group, Inc. for purposes
      of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Integrys Energy Group, Inc. and will be retained by Integrys Energy
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3497 

To provide the force and effect of law for certain regulations relating to 

the taking of double-crested cormorants to reduce depredation at aquaculture facilities and protect public resources. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2016 

Mr. COTTON (for himself, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. COCHRAN, and 

Mr. SHELBY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To provide the force and effect of law for certain regulations 

relating to the taking of double-crested cormorants to 

reduce depredation at aquaculture facilities and protect 

public resources. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safeguard Aquaculture 

5 Farmers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE TAKING OF DOU7 BLE-CRESTED CORMORANTS. 

8 (a) FORCE AND EFFECT.— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3497 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), 

2 section 21.47 of title 50, Code of Federal Regula3 tions (as in effect on the date of enactment of this 

4 Act), shall have the force and effect of law. 

5 (2) PUBLIC NOTICE.—The Secretary of the In6 terior (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Sec7 retary’’), acting through the Director of the United 

8 States Fish and Wildlife Service (referred to in this 

9 section as the ‘‘Director’’), shall notify the public of 

10 the authority provided by paragraph (1) in a manner 

11 determined appropriate by the Secretary. 

12 (b) SUNSET.—The authority provided by subsection 

13 (a)(1) shall terminate on the date that is the earlier of— 

14 (1) the effective date of a regulation promul15 gated by the Director after the date of enactment of 

16 this Act to control depredation of double-crested cor17 morant populations; or 

18 (2) 1 year after the date of enactment of this 

19 Act. 

20 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec21 tion limits the authority of the Director to promulgate reg22 ulations relating to the taking of double-crested cor23 morants under any other law. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOv - 5 2010 

U.S. District & B~~

) Courts the ~lstrict of c~

Joan F. M. Malone, 

Plaintiff, 

) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 10 1901 

Eleanor H. Norton et al., 

) 

Defendants. ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and 

application for leave to proceed in formapauperis. The Court will grant the in forma pauperis 

application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading 

requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and is frivolous. 

Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires 

complaints to contain "(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction 

[and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 

F.3d 661,668-7 1 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair 

notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate 

defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 

F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JENNIFER HOLT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D18-4147 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed April 24, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Carly J. Robbins-Gilbert, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of The Buckle, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Dennis H. Nelson, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ DENNIS H. NELSONDennis
      H. NelsonChief
      Executive Officer (principal executive officer)June
      11, 2009