alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      31.1**







**Certification**





I,
      Douglas C. Morrison, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K, all reports on Form 8-K containing
      distribution or servicing reports filed, and all reports on Form 10-D required
      to be filed, in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of
      Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic
      reports");





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this report;





3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, (i) the distribution or servicing information required to be
      provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
      similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports
      and (ii) all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
      to be
      provided on Form 10-D with respect to the period covered by this report is
      included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  Based
      on
      my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
      under
      Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
      reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
      agreement; and





5.  All
      of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
      with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
      in
      this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as exhibits to this report, except as
      otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
      described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank Trust Company
      Americas.








Date:
      March 30, 2007








/s/
      Douglas C. Morrison


_____________________________


Douglas
      C. Morrison


Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer


Citibank
      (South Dakota), National Association
Exhibit 32

   Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In  connection  with the filing of the  financial  statements of Ophthalmic
Imaging  Systems  ("Registrant")  for the  quarter  ended  June  30,  2003  (the
"Report"),   each  of  the  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  to  such  officer's
knowledge, that:


1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.



                                                       /s/ Gil Allon
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Gil Allon
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                                       /s/ Ariel Shenhar
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Ariel Shenhar
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to  Ophthalmic  Imaging  Systems  and will be  retained  by  Ophthalmic
Imaging  Systems and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 21.  Securities of Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Year         Percentage
                                  Jurisdiction     Acquired       of Voting
Name of Subsidiary              of Incorporation   or Formed   Securities Owned
                                ________________   _________   ________________
<S>                             <C>                <C>         <C>
ASI Data Services Inc.                Maine          1993            100%

Northeast Savings Bank, F.S.B.        Maine          1987            100%
(and its 100% ownedsubsidiary,
 Northeast Financial Service
 Corporation).

</TABLE>
Corporate Resolution





Tax-Free Fund of Colorado





Be it known that the following corporate resolution is in full force and effect:





WHEREAS The Board of Trustees of the Fund adopted the following resolutions on motion duly made, seconded and carried unanimously at the Fund’s Board of Trustees’ Meetings held on June 12, 2011;





NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proposed fidelity bond with ICI Mutual Insurance Company be and it hereby is approved, as a joint insured bond including the respective Fund and related entities, and





RESOLVED, that there is hereby authorized an annual premium (with premium tax), a reserve premium, and a commitment to ICI Mutual Insurance Company, and





RESOLVED, that allocation of the annual premium and premium tax shall be in accordance with an Agreement Among Insureds to be executed by the respective Fund as an additional party, and





RESOLVED, that the Secretary and the Assistant Secretary are hereby authorized to make any required filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 17g-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940.





Sealed this 22nd day of August 2011.
/s/  John M. HerndonJohn M. Herndon

Assistant Secretary

The Aquila Group of Funds®
#### IRWIN CO., Inc. et al. v. TIDE PUB. CO., Inc.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 17, 1952.

Murphy, Block, Sullivan & Sawyer, New York City, John Dwight Sullivan, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiffs.

Royce A. Wilson, New York City, for defendant.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The present papers are insufficient to require a deviation from the usual rule that a plaintiff, having selected a forum, must be prepared to bear the necessary costs of prosecuting his claim, and, therefore, should submit to examination at his own expense in the forum he has chosen. See Morrison Export Co. Ltd. v. Goldstone, D.C., 12 F.R.D. 258. Assuming that the corporate plaintiff is experiencing serious financial difficulties, no information as to the financial condition of the individual plaintiff, whose deposition is sought, is set forth other than the statement than his only “assured” source of income is his salary of $500 per month, paid by the corporate plaintiff, and that he has a wife and two children whom he supports. Facts with respect to the existence of other sources *19of income, living expenses, and any suggestion as to his financial worth and like matters are lacking.

The motion is, therefore, denied. The order to be entered may provide that if the individual plaintiff decides not to come to this District for the taking of his deposition, it may be conducted in Beverly Hills, California, upon condition that he pay the expenses and reasonable counsel fees to defendant’s attorneys in an amount to be fixed by the Court. See Worth v. Trans-World Films, Inc., D.C., 11 F.R.D. 197.

Settle order on notice.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-15598, 333-36204, 333-56946,
333-59290, 333-83971, and 333-89876 of Frontier Oil Corporation on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 333-80253 on Form S-3 of Frontier Oil Corporation of our reports
dated February 19, 2004, appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A of Frontier Oil Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas
October 12, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derek G. Williams, Appellant.

[856 NYS2d 356]

*1184It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and on the law by vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Ontario County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of three counts of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]), defendant contends for the first time on appeal that he was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender inasmuch as the predicate conviction, the New Jersey crime of burglary in the third degree, is not the equivalent of a New York felony. We agree (see *People v Muniz,*74 NY2d 464 [1989]). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant was required to preserve his contention for our review (see *People v Samms,*95 NY2d 52, 57-58 [2000]), we conclude that this case “presents a proper basis for exercising our interest-of-justice jurisdiction” *(People v Assadourian,*19 AD3d 207, 208 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 785 [2005]; see *People v Marrero, 2*AD3d 107 [2003], *affd*3 NY3d 762 [2004]). We therefore modify the judgment by vacating the sentence. Inasmuch as defendant’s sentence was imposed pursuant to a plea agreement, we remit the matter to County Court to resentence defendant or to “entertain a motion by the People, should the People be so disposed, to vacate the plea and set aside the conviction in its entirety” *(People v Irwin,*166 AD2d 924, 925 [1990], citing *People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 307-308 [1981]). Further, should the People be so disposed, they may withdraw their consent to the waiver of indictment *(see*CPL 195.10 [1] [c]; *People v Terry,*152 AD2d 822, 823 [1989]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Smith, Centra, Lunn and Fahey, JJ.
<TABLE>
                                                                   Northern Illinois Gas Company
                                                                            Form 10-K
                                                                          Exhibit 12.01


                                      NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY
                     COMPUTATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                               (Thousands)
<CAPTION>

                                                                      Year Ended December 31                 
                                                       1995       1994      1993       1992      1991   

Earnings available to cover fixed charges:

 <S>                                               <C>         <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>
 Net income                                        $  85,448   $  93,078 $  94,935  $  91,239 $  91,368

 Add:  Income taxes                                   49,881      50,958    52,890     49,578    47,664

       Fixed charges                                  39,400      37,729    40,960     41,648    40,969

       Allowance for funds used
          during construction                           (911)       (151)      (64)      (915)     (700)

 Total                                             $ 173,818   $ 181,614 $ 188,721  $ 181,550 $ 179,301


Fixed charges:

 Interest on debt                                  $  38,129   $  36,726 $  38,949  $  39,773 $  36,270

 Other interest charges and
    amortization of debt discount,
    premium and expense, net                           1,271       1,003     2,011      1,875     4,699

 Total                                             $  39,400   $  37,729 $  40,960  $  41,648 $  40,969


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                      4.41        4.81      4.61       4.36      4.38
</TABLE>
#### Laura GENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, CORPORATION; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-16476.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Jan. 3, 2013.

Laura Gens, Palo Alto, CA, pro se.

Yaw-Jiun Wu, Robert Collings Little, Esquire, Mark T. Flewelling, Anglin, Fle-welling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, Pasadena, CA, Nicole K. Neff, Robin Prema Wright, Esquire, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, Newport Beach, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Laura Gens appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing her action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal. *King v. California,*784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir.1986). We review for an abuse of discretion a district court’s decision whether to apply equitable tolling. *Huynh v. Chase Manhattan Bank,*465 F.3d 992, 1003 (9th Cir.2006). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Gens’s Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) claims for damages and rescission as time-barred because Gens did not file her action within three years of the alleged violation. *See*15 U.S.C. § 1640(e) (an action for damages under TILA must be brought within one year of the alleged violation); 15 U.S.C. § 1635(f) (permitting up to three years to rescind under TILA). Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to apply equitable tolling to Gens’s TILA claim seeking damages because Gens did not act with due diligence. *See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,*656 F.3d 1034, 1045 (9th Cir.2011) (noting that equitable tolling applies “in situations where, despite all due diligence, the party invoking equitable tolling is unable to obtain vital information bearing on the existence of the claim” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We do not consider whether the district court properly concluded that Gens’s state law claims were preempted by the Home Owners’ Loan Act because Gens neither *534raised nor argued the issue in her opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3419 

To amend the Veterans’ Oral History Project Act to allow the collection 

of video and audio recordings of biographical histories by immediate 

family members of members of the Armed Forces who died as a result 

of their service during a period of war, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Veterans’ Oral History Project Act to allow 

the collection of video and audio recordings of biographical histories by immediate family members of members 

of the Armed Forces who died as a result of their service 

during a period of war, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Families 

5 Voices Act of 2016’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3419 IS

1 SEC. 2. COLLECTION OF VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDINGS 

2 OF BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORIES BY IMME3 DIATE FAMILY MEMBERS OF MEMBERS OF 

4 THE ARMED FORCES WHO DIED AS A RESULT 

5 OF THEIR SERVICE DURING A PERIOD OF 

6 WAR. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 3(a) of 

8 the Veterans’ Oral History Project Act (20 U.S.C. 

9 2142(a)(1)) is amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(1) to collect video and audio recordings of— 

11 ‘‘(A) personal histories and testimonials of 

12 veterans of the Armed Forces who served dur13 ing a period of war; and 

14 ‘‘(B) biographical histories by immediate 

15 family members of members of the Armed 

16 Forces who became missing in action or died as 

17 a result of their service during a period of 

18 war;’’. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3 of such 

20 Act (20 U.S.C. 2142) is further amended by adding at 

21 the end the following new subsection: 

22 ‘‘(d) IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER DEFINED.—For 

23 purposes of subsection (a), the term ‘immediate family 

24 member’ means a parent, spouse, sibling, or child.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wisconsin Electric Power Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Allen L. Leverett, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ ALLEN L. LEVERETT
**EXHIBIT 32.2****Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)**     The undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Zale Corporation, certifies, to the best ofhis knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005, whichaccompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ZaleCorporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is madepursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not berelied upon for any other purpose.This3rd day of October, 2005.         By: /s/ Mark R. Lenz             Mark R. Lenz      Group Senior Vice President and      Chief Financial Officer      (principal financial officer of the registrant)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7146

FERNANDEZ HARVEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

CAROLYN CROSS, Warden, Lawrenceville Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-99-976-AM)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fernandez Harvey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s judgment or order is marked as

“filed” on July 19, 1999, the district court’s record shows that it

was entered on the docket sheet on July 20, 1999. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet

that we take as the effective date of the district court’s

decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.

1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Fernandez Harvey appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Harvey v. Cross, No. CA-99-976-AM (E.D.

Va. July 20, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 119 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 119

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science in the 
                      One Hundred Eighth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2003

Mr. Boehlert submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science in the 
                      One Hundred Eighth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Science (hereafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the expenses of 
all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 
of the House of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 
not more than $12,301,690 for the One Hundred Eighth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $6,072,465 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2003, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2004; and
            (2) not more than $6,229,225 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2004, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2005.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
****

**In The**

**Court of Appeals**

**Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo**

**________________________**

**No. 07-12-0461-CV**

**________________________**

**MUSTAFA E. DERKUNT, APPELLANT**

**V.**

**COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, APPELLEE**

****

**On Appeal from the 261st District Court**

**Travis County, Texas**

**Trial Court No. D-1-GN-11-000745, Honorable Donald Kraemer, Presiding**

****

**April 5, 2013**

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

**Before Quinn, C.J., and Campbell and Pirtle, JJ.**

The brief of *pro se* appellant Mustafa Engin Derkunt was due for filing on February 25, 2013.  When the brief was not filed, we notified Derkunt by letter of March 4, 2013, that pursuant to appellate rules 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b) the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless he filed his brief, along with a motion requesting additional time, by March 14, 2013.  We have received from Derkunt neither a brief, a motion for additional time nor any other response to our March 4 letter.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(b).  As Derkunt appears in the case as an indigent, no costs are assessed. 

Per Curiam

2

# image1.png