alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Filed 7/11/24 P. v. Chaira CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MANUEL CHAIRA, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant. E082732

(Super.Ct.No. RIF151153 )

OPINION

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. John D. Molloy, Judge.

Dismissed.

Benjamin Kington, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent. California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.2 INTRODUCTION

Defendant Manuel Chaira, Jr. appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for

resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable

issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 ( Delgadillo ).

On May 9, 2024, we notified defendant: (1) counsel filed a brief indicating no

arguable issues had been identified; ( 2) as a case arising from an order denying

postconviction relief, this court was not required to conduct an independent review of the

record, but we could do so in our discretion; and (3) in accordance with the procedures

set forth in Delgadillo , he had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief raising any

argument he wanted this court to consider. We also notified defendant that if we did not

receive a brief within that 30

- day period, we may dismiss the appeal as abandoned. More

than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. We

consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed. ( Delgadillo,

supra , 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OF FICIAL REPORTS

We concur:

CODRINGTON

Acting P. J.

MENETREZ

J. FIELDS

J.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                         PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                            VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the quarter ended December 31, 2006, of Valence Technology, Inc. (the "Issuer").

         I, Thomas F. Mezger, the Principal Financial Officer of the Issuer,
         certify that to the best of my knowledge:

          (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
               13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
               U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

          (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Issuer.

Dated:  February 6, 2007               /s/ Thomas F. Mezger
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Thomas F. Mezger
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 938 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 938

To prohibit Federal payments to any individual, business, institution, 
             or organization that engages in human cloning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2003

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit Federal payments to any individual, business, institution, 
             or organization that engages in human cloning.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Human Cloning Prevention Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

    (a) General Rule.--Except as provided in subsection (b), no Federal 
agency shall--
            (1) make any grant, contract, or other payment; or
            (2) enter into any obligation for making any such grant, 
        contract, or payment,
to any individual, business, institution, or organization that within 
the past 1 year has engaged in human cloning, or to any individual, 
business, institution, or organization that controls, is controlled by, 
or is under common control with any individual, business, institution, 
or organization that within the past 1 year has engaged in human 
cloning.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to any payment a 
Federal agency is obligated to make.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``human cloning'' means human 
asexual reproduction, accomplished by introducing nuclear material from 
one or more human somatic cells into a fertilized or unfertilized 
oocyte whose nuclear material has been removed or inactivated so as to 
produce a living organism (at any stage of development) that is 
genetically identical to an existing or previously existing human 
organism.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 329 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 23, 2003.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 2738) to implement the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement. The bill 
shall be considered as read for amendment. The bill shall be debatable for two 
hours, with one hour and forty minutes equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means and 
twenty minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. Pursuant to section 151(f)(2) 
of the Trade Act of 1974, the previous question shall be considered as ordered 
on the bill to final passage without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2739) 
to implement the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The bill shall be debatable for two hours, 
with one hour and forty minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means and twenty 
minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on the Judiciary. Pursuant to section 151(f)(2) of the 
Trade Act of 1974, the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill to final passage without intervening motion.
    Sec. 3. During consideration of H.R. 2738 or H.R. 2739 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the bill to a time designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Corporate Resolution

Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund

      Be it known that the following corporate resolution is in full
force and effect:

      WHEREAS The Trustees were familiar with the fidelity bond which
covered the Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund, as Prime Cash Fund,
and the other funds of the Aquila Group of Fundssm, as well as with the
sharing of premiums and policy benefits of the bond among those funds;
and

       WHEREAS It was proposed that in its new character and
configuration, Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund participate in
the same manner as the other funds in these arrangements; and

      WHEREAS The Board of Trustees of Aquila Three Peaks High I
ncome Fund adopted the following resolutions on motion duly made,
seconded and carried unanimously at the Fund's Board of Trustees'
Meeting held on March 12, 2006;

      NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proposed fidelity bond
with ICI Mutual Insurance Company be and it hereby is approved, as a
joint insured bond including the Fund and related entities, and


	RESOLVED, that there is hereby authorized an annual premium
(with premium tax), a reserve premium, a commitment to ICI Mutual
Insurance Company secured by a letter of credit, and an unsecured
commitment to ICI Mutual Insurance Company, and

	RESOLVED, that allocation of the annual premium and premium
tax shall be in accordance with an Agreement Among Insureds to be
executed by the Fund as an additional party, and

	RESOLVED, that the letter of credit fee for the Fund's
secured commitment is hereby authorized, and


	RESOLVED, that the Secretary and the Assistant Secretary
are hereby authorized to make any required filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 17g-1 under the Investment
Company Act of 1940.


Sealed this 5th day of July 2006.

								/s/  John M. Herndon
								________________________
                    					John M. Herndon
								Assistant Secretary
Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          33,589
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,269
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,439
<PP&E>                                         168,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,314
<BONDS>                                         70,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,278
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,026
<SALES>                                        297,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               299,368
<CGS>                                          265,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  265,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,968
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,818
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,013)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.8
 ZALE DELAWARE, INC
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
( As amended through July 31, 2006 )
 ARTICLE I
 ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE
 Establishment .
 Purpose
 ARTICLE II
 DEFINITIONS
  Base Salary
 Benefit
 Bonus Points
 Bonus Target
 2.5 Change of Control




---



##### 



Company
 Compensation Committee
 Disabled
 2




---



##### 



Final Average Pay
 Maximum Bonus Target
   Plan Year
 Years of Service
 ARTICLE III
 ELIGIBILITY
 Eligibility
 Loss of Eligibility
 ARTICLE IV
 DETERMINATION OF BENEFITS
 Calculation of Benefit .
 3




---



##### 



Benefit Points x Final Average Pay
  Benefit Points
 50%
  Vesting
 Transferred Liability The Wall Street Journal The Wall Street Journal
 4




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 PAYMENT OF BENEFITS
 Retirement ,
 Death . 65,
  Other Termination of Service ,
 Form of Payment 50%
 Withholding of Taxes
 5




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
 ADMINISTRATION
 Authority of Compensation Committee
 Indemnification of Employees of the Company
 Cost of Administration
 ARTICLE VII
 CLAIMS PROCEDURE
 Claim
 Denial of Claim
   6




---



##### 



Review of Claim )
 Appeal of Decision on Review (75)
 Final Decision
 ARTICLE VIII
 AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
 Amendment 75%
 Termination of the Plan 7
 7




---



##### 



ARTICLE IX
 GENERAL PROVISIONS
 Rights Against the Company
 Funding
 Payment Due to an Individual Who is Incapable of Managing His or Her Affairs
 Spendthrift Clause
 Severability
 Construction
 8




---



##### 



Governing Law
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 ZALE DELAWARE, INC.
 9
#### In re: VIOXX MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Erie County, New York v. Merck & Co., Inc., D. New Jersey,

C.A. No. 1:07-5517.

MDL No. 1657.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

April 3, 2008.

Before D. LOWELL JENSEN, Acting Chairman, JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman *, J. FREDERICK MOTZ *, ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN and ANTHONY J. SCIRICA *, Judges of the Panel.

*

 Judges Heyburn, Motz and Scirica took no part in the disposition of this matter.

*1357TRANSFER ORDER

D. LOWELL JENSEN, Acting Chairman.

Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiff in this New Jersey action moves pursuant to Rule 7.4, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), asking the Panel to vacate its order conditionally transferring the action to the Eastern District of Louisiana for inclusion in MDL No. 1657. Defendant Merck & Co., Inc., opposes the motion.

After considering all counsel’s argument, we find that this action involves common questions of fact with actions in this litigation previously transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana, and that transfer of the action to the Eastern District of Louisiana for inclusion in MDL No. 1657 will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. We further find that transfer of this action is appropriate for reasons that we set out in our original order directing centralization in this docket. In that order, we held that the Eastern District of Louisiana was a proper Section 1407 forum for actions involving claims relating to Vioxx. *See In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation,*360 F.Supp.2d 1352 (J.P.M.L.2005).

The parties can present the pending motion for remand to state court to the transferee judge. *See, e.g., In re Ivy,*901 F.2d 7 (2d Cir.1990); *In re Prudential Insurance Company of America Sales Practices Litigation,*170 F.Supp.2d 1346, 1347-48 (J.P.M.L.2001).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, this action is transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Eldon E. Fallon for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings occurring there in this docket.
Opinion filed March 30, 2018

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-18-00072-CR

___________

DANNY REED DIKE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 350th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12694-D

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Danny Reed Dike, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. In the 

motion, Appellant acknowledges that he waived his right to appeal and states that 

this appeal should be dismissed. The motion is signed by both Appellant and his

counsel in accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. 

March 30, 2018 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Willson, J., 

Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

 

1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
[logo - American Funds(r)]

                          Capital Income Builder, Inc.
                             333 South Hope Street
                         Los Angeles, California 90071
                              Phone (213) 486-9200




                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



JAMES B.  LOVELACE,  Vice Chairman and PEO, and SHERYL F. JOHNSON,  Treasurer of
Capital Income Builder,  Inc., (the  "Registrant"),  each certify to the best of
his or her knowledge that:

1)   The  Registrant's  periodic report on Form N-CSR for the period ended April
     30, 2005 (the "Form N-CSR") fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)   The  information  contained  in the  Form  N-CSR  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.


Principal Executive Officer                     Principal Financial Officer

CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, INC.                    CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, INC.


/s/ James B. Lovelace                           /s/ Sheryl F. Johnson
--------------------------------                ----------------------------
James B. Lovelace, Vice Chairman                Sheryl F. Johnson, Treasurer

Date:  July 8, 2005                             Date:  July 8, 2005


A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, INC. and
will be retained by CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, INC. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") or its staff upon request.

This  certification  is being furnished to the Commission  solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form N-CSR filed with
the Commission.
Michigan Supreme

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 5, 2015 

# Order

May 5, 2015

151386

- 7 ( 38 )

In re KMN, Minor. SC: 151386

- 7

COA: 322329, 322883

Newaygo CC Family Division:

14

- 000805

- AD

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for the temporary admission of Philip

(Jay) McCarthy, Jr. to practice pro hac vice under MCR 8.126(A) is GRANTED

.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
American Mutual Fund:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of
American Mutual Fund (the "Fund") for the year ended October 31,
1998 (on which we have issued our report dated November 30, 1998),
we considered its internal control, including control activities
for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-
SAR, and not to provide assurance on the Fund's internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and may not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to the
risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in conditions
or that the effectiveness of the design and operation may
deteriorate.

Our consideration of the Fund's internal control would not
necessarily disclose all matters in internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is
a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in
the normal course of performing their assigned functions.  However,
we noted no matters involving the Fund's internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities, that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of October
31, 1998.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of American Mutual Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California
November 30, 1998
No. 714.

#### United States *v.*Heine.

April 29, 1946.

*Solicitor General McGrath*for the United States.

*George Gordon Battle*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                          $  3,166,000
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                     41,687,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                       40,903,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  94,951,000
<PP&E>                           112,897,000
<DEPRECIATION>                    68,458,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   157,511,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             41,749,000
<BONDS>                                    0
<COMMON>                           5,548,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                        93,123,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     157,511,000
<SALES>                          449,904,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 109,007,000
<CGS>                            347,412,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     86,630,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   8,367,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     996,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 1,828,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   11,186,000
<INCOME-TAX>                       4,407,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                       6,779,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                           1.03
        

</TABLE>