Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2017 / Notices 39565 

5 Id. 

1See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2013– 

2014, 80 FR 55328 (September 15, 2015) (Final 

Results). 

2See Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. 

United States, Court No. 15–00279, Slip Op. 17–27 

(March 16, 2017) (Remand Opinion and Order) at 

24. 

3See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand, dated June 6, 2017, at 9 (Remand 

Redetermination); available at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/remands/17-27.pdf. 

4See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2013– 

2014, 80 FR 55328, 55329 (September 15, 2015) 

(Final Results). 

5See Memorandum to the File, from Irene 

Gorelik, Senior International Trade Compliance 

Analyst, Office VIII, re: ‘‘Remand 

Redetermination—Revised Final Results 

Calculations,’’ dated May 12, 2017 (Remand 

Recalculations). 

at Attachments 1–4. 

6See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 

341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 

7See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. 

United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 

(Diamond Sawblades). 

8See Remand Recalculations at 4–6, for the list 

of the separate rate companies that are subject to 

this litigation; see also Memorandum to the File, 

from Irene Gorelik, Senior International Trade 

Compliance Analyst, Office VIII, re: ‘‘Final Remand 

Redetermination—Revised Final Remand 

Recalculations,’’ dated June 15, 2017 (Final Remand 

Recalculations) at 4 for the recalculation of the 

sample rate for the final remand redetermination. 

9See Final Results, 80 FR at 55329. See also 

Remand Recalculations at 4. 

10See Final Remand Recalculations at 3 and 

Attachments 1–4. 

to facilitate analysis of and the 

submission of comments and new 

factual information.5

For the reasons stated above, and 

because there are no compelling reasons 

to deny the request, the Department, in 

accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of 

the Act, is postponing the deadline for 

the preliminary determinations by 50 

days (i.e., 190 days after the date on 

which these investigations were 

initiated). As a result, the Department 

will issue its preliminary 

determinations no later than October 24, 

2017. In accordance with section 

735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final 

determinations of these investigations 

will continue to be 75 days after the 

date of publication of the preliminary 

determinations, unless postponed at a 

later date. 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). 

Dated: August 15, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17620 Filed 8–18–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–802] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Notice of Court Decision Not 

in Harmony With Final Results of 

Administrative Review and Notice of 

Amended Final Results 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 29, 2017, the Court 

of International Trade (CIT) issued its 

final judgment, sustaining the 

Department of Commerce’s (the 

Department’s) remand results pertaining 

to the ninth administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) 

covering the period of review (POR) of 

February 1, 2013, through January 31, 

2014. The Department is notifying the 

public that the final judgment in this 

case is not in harmony with the final 

results of the ninth administrative 

review,1 and that the Department is 

amending the final results with respect 

to the labor surrogate value applied in 

the administrative review. The effective 

date of this notice is July 9, 2017. 

DATES: Applicable July 9, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 15, 2015, the 

Department published its Final Results. 

In the Final Results, we relied on data 

from the Bangladeshi Bureau of 

Statistics (BBS) to value the 

respondents’ labor consumption. 

Subsequently, the CIT remanded this 

issue to the Department for further 

explanation or reconsideration.2 In the 

Remand Redetermination, the 

Department reconsidered its 

determination and found that the BBS 

data are not the best available 

information with which to value 

respondents’ labor.3 Consequently, the 

Department evaluated the alternative 

wage rates on the record and 

determined that India wage rate data are 

the best available information for 

valuing labor. 

In the Final Results, we calculated a 

0.00 percent weighted-average margin 

for Sao Ta Foods Joint Stock Company 

and a 1.16 percent weighted-average 

margin for Thuan Phuoc Seafoods and 

Trading Corporation.4 Based on our 

change of the labor surrogate value, we 

continued to calculate a 0.00 percent 

weighted-average margin for Sao Ta 

Foods Joint Stock Company and 

calculated a 1.42 percent weightedaverage margin for Thuan Phuoc 

Seafoods and Trading Corporation.5

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken,6 as clarified 

by Diamond Sawblades,7 the Federal 

Circuit held that, pursuant to section 

516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), the Department 

must publish a notice of a court 

decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with 

a Department determination and must 

suspend liquidation of entries pending 

a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. 

This notice is published in fulfillment 

of the publication requirement of 

Timken. Accordingly, the Department 

will continue the suspension of 

liquidation of the subject merchandise 

at issue in the Remand Redetermination 

pending expiration of the period to 

appeal or, if appealed, a final and 

conclusive court decision. 

Amended Final Results 

Because there is now a final court 

decision, the Department is amending 

the Final Results. Based on the Remand 

Redetermination, as affirmed by the 

Court on June 29, 2017, the revised 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Thuan Phuoc Seafoods and Trading 

Corporation for the period February 1, 

2013, through January 31, 2014, is 1.42 

percent. As noted above, there was no 

change to Sao Ta Foods Joint Stock 

Company’s weighted-average margin 

from the Final Results; we continued to 

calculate a 0.00 percent weightedaverage margin for Sao Ta Foods Joint 

Stock Company in the Remand 

Redetermination. 

Further, for the purpose of 

recalculating the sample rate for the 

non-individually examined companies 

that received a separate rate and are 

parties to this litigation,8 we adjusted 

the Minh Phu Group’s final margin from 

1.39 percent 9 to 1.53 percent; 10

however, there is no effect to the Minh 

Phu Group’s final margin of 1.39 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
39566 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2017 / Notices 

11Since the issuance of the Final Results, the 

Department has revoked the antidumping duty 

order with respect to the Minh Phu Group. See 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of 

Implementation of Determination Under Section 

129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and 

Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order, 

81 FR 47756, 47757–47758 (July 22, 2016). 

Moreover, the Minh Phu Group is not subject to this 

litigation, the original injunction enjoining the 

lifting of suspension has been lifted, and the 

suspended entries have been liquidated. 

Accordingly, our recalculations pertain to the two 

remaining mandatory respondents, Sao Ta Foods 

Joint Stock Company and Thuan Phuoc Seafoods 

and Trading Corporation, and the non-individually 

examined companies that received a separate rate 

and are subject to this litigation. 

12See Final Remand Recalculations at 4. 

13Sao Ta Foods Joint Stock Company was granted 

the following ‘‘also-known-as’’ (aka) or ‘‘doingbusiness-as’’ (dba) names in the Final Results 

(which were included in the injunction enjoining 

liquidation of suspended entries): Sao Ta Foods 

Joint Stock Company, aka Fimex VN, aka Sao Ta 

Seafood Factory, aka Saota Seafood Factory. 

However, many of these names were not granted 

separate rate status in Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 2014–2015, 81 FR 62717, 62718–62719 

(September 12, 2016) (AR10 Final Results). Thus, 

for liquidation purposes, we will continue to use 

Sao Ta Foods Joint Stock Company’s 

aforementioned aka/dba names; but for cash deposit 

purposes, only the aka and/or dba names granted 

in AR10 Final Results are valid. 

14Thuan Phuoc Seafoods and Trading 

Corporation was granted the following aka or dba 

names in the Final Results (which were included 

in the injunction enjoining liquidation of 

suspended entries): Thuan Phuoc Seafoods and 

Trading Corporation, aka Thuan Phuoc Corp., aka 

Frozen Seafoods Factory No. 32, aka Seafoods and 

Foodstuff Factory, aka Seafoods and Foodstuff 

Factory Vietnam, aka My Son Seafoods Factory. 

However, many of these names were not granted 

separate rate status in AR10 Final Results. Thus, for 

liquidation purposes, we will continue to use 

Thuan Phuoc Seafoods and Trading Corporation’s 

aforementioned aka/dba names; but for cash deposit 

purposes, only the aka and/or dba names granted 

in AR10 Final Results are valid. 

15See AR10 Final Results, 81 FR at 62718–62719. 

16Many of the aka or dba names subject to the 

litigation were not included in subsequent reviews. 

Therefore, the aka and/or dba names granted 

separate rate status in subsequent reviews 

supersede those listed above. The names listed 

above are included here as they appear in the 

injunctions enjoining liquidation pending 

completion of this litigation. Therefore, for 

liquidation purposes, we will continue to use the 

names above; however, only the aka and/or dba 

names granted separate rate status in subsequent 

reviews are valid for cash deposit purposes. 

17See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from 

the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2015– 

2016, 82 FR 11431, 11433 (February 23, 2017) 

(AR11 Final Results). 

percent in the Final Results.11 In the 

Remand Redetermination, the 

Department recalculated the sample rate 

resulting in a weighted-average 

dumping margin of 1.05 percent 12 for 

the non-individually examined 

companies that qualified for a separate 

rate and are subject to this litigation. 

In the event that the CIT’s ruling is 

not appealed or, if appealed, is upheld 

by a final and conclusive court decision, 

the Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection to assess 

antidumping duties on unliquidated 

entries of subject merchandise based on 

the importer-specific assessment rates 

recalculated in the Remand 

Redetermination for Sao Ta Foods Joint 

Stock Company and Thuan Phuoc 

Seafoods and Trading Corporation and 

the above-noted 1.05 percent 

recalculated sample rate for the nonindividually examined respondents that 

received a separate rate in the Final 

Results and are subject to this litigation. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Mandatory Respondents 

Because there have been subsequent 

administrative reviews for Sao Ta Foods 

Joint Stock Company 13 and Thuan 

Phuoc Seafoods and Trading 

Corporation,14 the cash deposit rate for 

these two companies will remain the 

rate established in the most recentlycompleted administrative review in 

which they received a cash deposit rate 

of 4.78 percent.15

Separate-Rate Companies 

There have been subsequent 

administrative reviews completed for 

the below-listed non-individually 

examined companies that qualified for a 

separate rate and are subject to this 

litigation; thus, the cash deposit rate for 

these exporters will remain the rate 

established in the most recentlycompleted administrative review in 

which they received a cash deposit rate. 

Exporter 16

Cash deposit 

rate in effect 

(percent) 

Federal Register 

notice 

Bac Lieu Fisheries Joint Stock Company, aka Bac Lieu Fisheries Company Limited, aka Bac Lieu Fisheries Co., Ltd., aka Bac Lieu Fisheries Limited Company, aka Bac Lieu Fis.4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Camau Frozen Seafood Processing Import Export Corporation, aka Camimex, aka Camau Seafood 

Factory No. 4, aka Camau Seafood Factory No. 5, aka Camau Frozen Seafood Processing Import 

Export Corp. (CAMIMEX–FAC 25), aka Frozen Factory No. 4.

4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

C.P. Vietnam Corporation, aka C.P. Vietnam Livestock Corporation, aka C.P. Vietnam Livestock Company Limited, aka C.P. Vietnam.25.76 AR11 Final Results.17

Cadovimex Seafood Import-Export and Processing Joint Stock Company, aka Cai Doi Vam Seafood 

Import-Export Company, aka Caidoivam Seafood Company (Cadovimex), aka Cadovimex-Vietnam.

4.78 AR11 Final Results. 

Can Tho Import Export Fishery Limited Company, aka CAFISH ............................................................... 4.78 AR10 Final Results 

Cuu Long Seaproducts Company, aka Cuulong Seaproducts Company, aka Cuu Long Seaproducts 

Limited, aka Cuulong Seapro, aka Cuu Long Seapro..

4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Gallant Ocean (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. .............................................................................................................. 4.78 AR11 Final Results. 

Gallant Dachan Seafood Co., Ltd. .............................................................................................................. 4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Hai Viet Corporation, aka HAVICO ............................................................................................................. 4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Investment Commerce Fisheries Corporation, aka Investment Commerce Fisheries Corp., aka Investment Commerce Fisheries, aka Incomfish, aka Incomfish Corp., aka Incomfish Corporation.4.78 AR11 Final Results. 

Kim Anh Company Limited, aka Kim Anh Co, Ltd ...................................................................................... 4.78 AR11 Final Results. 

Minh Cuong Seafood Import Export Frozen Processing Joint Stock Co, aka Minh Cuong Seafood 

Import- Export Processing, aka MC Seafood.

25.76 AR10 Final Results. 

Minh Hai Export Frozen Seafood Processing Joint-Stock Company, aka Minh Hai Jostoco .................... 4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Minh Hai Joint-Stock Seafoods Processing Company, aka Seaprodex Minh Hai, aka Sea Minh Hai, aka 

Seaprodex Min Hai, aka Seaprodex Minh Hai-Factory No. 78, aka Seaprodex Minh Hai (Minh Hai 

Joint Stock Seafoods Processing Co.), aka Seaprodex Minh Hai Workshop 1, aka Seaprodex Minh 

Hai Factory No. 69.

4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Minh Hai Sea Products Import Export Company, aka Ca Mau Seafood Joint Stock Company, aka 

Seaprimexco Vietnam, aka Seaprimexco.

4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Nha Trang Fisheries Joint Stock Company, aka Nha Trang Fisco, aka Nhatrang Fisco, aka Nha Trang 

Fisheries, Joint Stock.

4.78 AR11 Final Results. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2017 / Notices 39567 

Exporter 16

Cash deposit 

rate in effect 

(percent) 

Federal Register 

notice 

Nha Trang Seafoods Group: Nha Trang Seaproduct Company, aka Nha Trang Seafoods, aka NT Seafoods Corporation, aka NT Seafoods, aka Nha Trang Seafoods—F89 Joint Stock Company, aka Nha 

Trang Seafoods—F89, aka NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company, aka NTSF Seafoods.

4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Ngoc Tri Seafood Joint Stock Company, aka Ngoc Tri Seafood Company ............................................... 4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Phuong Nam Foodstuff Corp. aka Phuong Nam Co., Ltd., aka Phuong Nam Foodstuff Product Processing Joint Stock Corporation, aka Phuong Namco-Ltd.4.78 AR11 Final Results. 

Quoc Viet Seaproducts Processing Trading and Import-Export Co., Ltd ................................................... 4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Soc Trang Seafood Joint Stock Company, aka Stapimex, aka Soc Trang Aquatic Products and General Import Export Company, aka Soc Trang Aquatic Products and General Import Export Company 

(‘‘Stapimex’’), aka Stapmex.

4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Tan Phong Phu Seafoods Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................. 25.76 AR11 Final Results. 

Thong Thuan Company Limited, aka T&T Co., Ltd .................................................................................... 4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

UTXI Aquatic Products Processing Corporation, aka UT XI Aquatic Products Processing Corporation, 

aka UTXI Aquatic Products Processing Company, aka UT XI Aquatic Products Processing Company, 

aka UTXI Co. Ltd., aka UTXI, aka UTXICO, aka Hoang Phuong Seafood Factory, aka Hoang Phong 

Seafood Factory.

4.78 AR11 Final Results. 

Viet Foods Co., Ltd., aka Nam Hai Foodstuff and Export Company Ltd ................................................... 4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Vietnam Clean Seafood Corporation, aka Vina Cleanfood ......................................................................... 4.78 AR10 Final Results. 

Viet Hai Seafood Co., Ltd., aka Vietnam Fish One Co., Ltd ...................................................................... 4.78 AR11 Final Results. 

Viet I-Mei Frozen Foods Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................ 4.78 AR10 Final Results 

There have been no subsequent 

administrative reviews completed for 

the below-listed non-individually 

examined companies that qualified for a 

separate rate and are subject to this 

litigation; thus, the cash deposit rate of 

1.05 percent, as recalculated in the 

Remand Redetermination, applies for 

these exporters. 

Exporter 

Cash deposit 

rate in effect 

(percent) 

Bentre Forestry and Aquaproduct Import-Export Joint Stock Company, aka FAQUIMEX ................................................................. 1.05 

Fine Foods Co., aka FFC .................................................................................................................................................................... 1.05 

Goldenquality Seafood Corporation .................................................................................................................................................... 1.05 

Tacvan Frozen Seafood Processing Export Company, aka Tacvan Seafoods Co ............................................................................ 1.05 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), 

751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: August 15, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17630 Filed 8–18–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XF612 

Fisheries of the South Atlantic; South 

Atlantic Fishery Management Council; 

Public Meeting 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting. 

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery 

Management Council (Council) will 

hold a meeting of its Scientific and 

Statistical Committee (SSC) to review 

the Research Track stock assessment 

development procedure proposed by the 

Southeast Fisheries Science Center 

(SEFSC). See SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. 

DATES: The SSC meeting will be held via 

webinar on Tuesday, September 5, 2017, 

from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held 

via webinar. The webinar is open to 

members of the public. Those interested 

in participating should contact Mike 

Errigo at the Council office (see FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) to 

request an invitation providing webinar 

access information. Please request 

webinar invitations at least 24 hours in 

advance of the webinar. 

Council address: South Atlantic 

Fishery Management Council, 4055 

Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N. 

Charleston, SC 29405. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mike Errigo; 4055 Faber Place Drive, 

Suite 201, North Charleston, SC 29405; 

phone: (843) 571–4366 or toll free (866) 

SAFMC–10; fax: (843) 769–4520; email: 

mike.errigo@safmc.net. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

meeting is held to review the Research 

Track stock assessment development 

procedure proposed by NOAA 

Fisheries’ Southeast Fisheries Science 

Center. The SSC decided at their April 

25–27, 2017 meeting in Charleston, SC, 

that the procedure for the Research 

Track was unclear and that they needed 

a document clearly laying out the 

process and approach of the Research 

Track before they could provide 

detailed comments. 

Items to be addressed during this 

meeting: 

1. Review the proposed Research 

Track procedure and provide comments 

and recommendations as necessary. 

Special Accommodations 

The meeting is physically accessible 

to people with disabilities. Requests for 

sign language interpretation or other 

auxiliary aids should be directed to the 

Council office (see ADDRESSES) at least 5 

business days prior to the meeting. 

Note: The times and sequence specified in 

this agenda are subject to change. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES