alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-QSB filed for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                         <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                             114                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     114                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,927                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        10,600                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,413)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       114                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       17                   9,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (17)                 (9,589)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        






</TABLE>
Certificate of Trust of State Street Capital Trust VI



 Exhibit 4.9 
  

					
		 	Delaware	  	PAGE 1
		 	The First State	  	

 I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE
ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF STATUTORY TRUST REGISTRATION OF “STATE STREET CAPITAL TRUST VI”, FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH, A.D. 2009, AT 11:48 O’CLOCK A.M. 
  

							
		  	

	  		  	 



		  	  		  	Jeffrey W. Bullock, Secretary of State
	 4662911 8100
	  	  		  	AUTHENTICATION: 7174308
	  
 090247603
	  	  		  	     DATE: 03-09-09

	You may verify this certificate online at corp. delaware.gov/authver.shtml	  	  		  	








 

 
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF 
 STATE STREET CAPITAL TRUST VI 
 THIS Certificate of Trust of State Street Capital Trust VI (the “Trust”), is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to
form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801 et seq.) (the “Act”). 
 1. Name. The
name of the statutory trust being formed hereby is State Sheet Capital Trust VI. 
 2.
Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware are U.S. Bank Trust National Association, 300 Delaware Avenue, 9th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 
 3. Effective Date. This
Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing. 
 [Signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust, have executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act. 
  

			
	 U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
 not in
its individual capacity but solely as trustee

		
	By:	 	 



	Name:	 	EARL W. DENNISON JR.
	Title:	 	VICE PRESIDENT
	
	 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
 not in its
individual capacity but solely as trustee

		
	By:	 	 



	Name:	 	EARL W. DENNISON JR.
	Title:	 	VICE PRESIDENT
	
	 



	 Name: LYNNE JIMENEZ, not in his/her individual capacity but solely as Administrative Trustee
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin M. Waleski, Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 613]

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 *et seq.).*We agree with defendant that County Court erred in adopting the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders that an upward departure from a level one to a level two risk was warranted based upon the failure of defendant to address his alcohol and marihuana use. “The court’s reliance on defendant’s history of drug and alcohol abuse to justify the upward departure from the presumptive risk level was improper because defendant’s history of substance abuse was already taken into account when defendant was assessed maximum points for that history in the risk assessment instrument” *(People v Perkins,*35 AD3d 1167, 1168 [2006]; *see People v Mount,*17 AD3d 714, 715 [2005]). In addition, we note that defendant successfully participated in a sex offender treatment program while incarcerated. We therefore conclude that the court’s determination of defendant’s risk level is not supported by the requisite clear and convincing evidence *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *cf. People v Carswell,*8 AD3d 1073 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 607 [2004]), and we modify the order accordingly. Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Smith, Green and Gorski, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Zale Corporation, certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Zale Corporation at the dates and for the
periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for
any other purpose.

Date: October 12, 2010

By:

/s/ MATTHEW W. APPEL Matthew W. Appel Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer of the registrant)


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                          $ 15,485,000
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                     32,722,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                       44,753,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  96,722,000
<PP&E>                           122,515,000
<DEPRECIATION>                    58,839,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   162,709,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             35,033,000
<BONDS>                                    0
<COMMON>                           6,912,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                       100,881,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     162,709,000
<SALES>                          430,358,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 106,441,000
<CGS>                            326,983,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     82,904,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   9,834,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     735,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 2,457,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   10,511,000
<INCOME-TAX>                       4,340,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                       6,171,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.00
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.7 THE WESTAIM CORPORATION Chief Executive Officers Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Barry M. Heck, certify that:  1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2004 of The
Westaim Corporation;2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): 1




---



##### 



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: March 22, 2005 /s/ Barry M. HeckName:
    Barry M. HeckTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Ziegler Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries financial statements and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,012,977
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,143,915
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0<F1>
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         68,408,554<F2>
<PP&E>                                       7,165,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,156,499
<SHORT-TERM>                                34,873,639<F3>
<PAYABLES>                                  10,528,000<F4>
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                 25,852,808<F5>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,544,030
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,675,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               141,156,499
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0<F6>
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                         4,379,040
<COMMISSIONS>                                        0<F6>
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>               33,633,401
<FEE-REVENUE>                                6,320,673
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,996,573
<COMPENSATION>                              24,842,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,784,614<F7>
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,974,714<F7>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,644,687<F8>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.53<F9>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.51<F9>
<FN>
<F1>Short-term investments includes some securities purchased under resale
agreements.
<F2>Financial instruments includes securities inventory investment in leases,
notes receivable and investment in and receivables from affiliates.
<F3>Includes short-term notes payable and unsecured notes payable to banks
under line of credit agreements.
<F4>Includes payable to customers, payable to broker-dealers, accounts payable,
and dividends payable.
<F5>Includes bonds payable and notes payable to banks other than line of credit
borrowings.
<F6>Revenue from investment banking activities also includes revenue from
trading activities and commissions.
<F7>Includes only income from continuing operations.
<F8>Income from continuing and discontinued operations.
<F9>In response to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards #128,
earnings per share are being restated as basic EPS and diluted EPS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willie E. Wimes, Appellant.

[856 NYS2d 332]

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted assault in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.10 [3]). “To the extent that defendant challenges the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution, his waiver of the right to appeal encompasses that contention” *(People v Spivey,*9 AD3d 886, 886 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 712 [2004]; *see People v Donahue,*21 AD3d 1359 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 775 [2006]). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his plea on the ground that it was involuntary.

“ ‘[R]efusal to permit withdrawal does not constitute an abuse of . . . discretion unless there is some evidence of innocence, *1287fraud, or mistake in inducing the plea . . . [and, h]ere, defendant failed to present evidence to warrant withdrawal of the plea’ ” *(People v Pillich,*48 AD3d 1061 [2008]). The plea was entered on the third day of trial, in satisfaction of charges of attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 125.25 [1]), assault in the first degree (§ 120.10 [1], [3]), and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree (§ 265.09 [1] [b]). Although there had been testimony at trial that defendant was intoxicated at the time of the incident, there was no mention of intoxication during the plea allocution, despite the fact that intoxication could have negated the element of depraved indifference in the crime to which defendant pleaded guilty (see § 15.25; *People v Coon,*34 AD3d 869, 870 [2006]). Thus, because nothing in defendant’s statements during the plea colloquy cast “significant doubt upon the defendant’s guilt or otherwise call[ed] into question the voluntariness of the plea,” the court had no duty to conduct a further inquiry to ensure that the plea was voluntary *(People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]). Indeed, it may reasonably be inferred that the People agreed to the plea to a lesser charge based on the evidence at trial of defendant’s intoxication, from which the jury might have found that defendant was unable to form the requisite intent to commit the crimes of attempted murder or intentional assault, as charged in the indictment, while defendant agreed to the plea because the jury might have found to the contrary.

Contrary to the further contention of defendant, the court did not abuse its discretion by failing, sua sponte, to order a competency examination pursuant to CPL article 730 (see *People v Taylor,*13 AD3d 1168, 1169 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 836 [2005]; see *generally People v Williams,*35 AD3d 1273, 1274-1275 [2006], *lv denied*8 NY3d 928 [2007]). “[Defendant responded coherently and rationally during the plea proceeding and indicated that he understood the implications of his decision to accept the plea agreement” *(People v Rivas,*206 AD2d 549, 550 [1994]; see *Taylor,*13 AD3d at 1169-1170).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are lacking in merit. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24 - 0067 CITY OF WHITEFISH,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. AARON JOSEPH BROUGHTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 9 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 5 2024

08/05/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0067
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3524 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3524

 To amend Rule 611 of the Federal Rules of Evidence to prohibit cross-
     examination by the accused of minor victims of sexual assault.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 8, 2016

  Mr. Flake (for himself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend Rule 611 of the Federal Rules of Evidence to prohibit cross-
     examination by the accused of minor victims of sexual assault.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROSS-EXAMINATION OF VICTIMS BY THE ACCUSED.

    (a) In General.--Rule 611 of the Federal Rules of Evidence is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Cross-Examination by Pro Se Defendants of Minor Victims of 
Sexual Assault.--In a criminal case in which a defendant accused of 
sexual assault of a minor represents himself or herself pro se, upon 
application by the prosecutor, the minor, or the minor's 
representative, cross-examination of the minor--
            ``(1) shall not be conducted by the defendant unless the 
        court finds that it is necessitated by exceptional 
        circumstances to protect the constitutional rights of the 
        defendant; and
            ``(2) shall instead be conducted by an attorney for the 
        defendant under the supervision of the court.
    ``(e) Definitions.--In this rule--
            ``(1) the term `minor' means an individual under the age of 
        18;
            ``(2) the term `sexual assault of a minor' means a crime 
        under Federal law involving--
                    ``(A) any conduct--
                            ``(i) prohibited under section 1591 or 
                        chapter 109A, 110, or 117 of title 18, United 
                        States Code; or
                            ``(ii) described in paragraphs (2) through 
                        (5) of Rule 413(d); and
                    ``(B) a victim who is a minor; and
            ``(3) the term `victim' means a person directly and 
        proximately harmed as a result of the commission of an 
        offense.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply--
            (1) to any proceeding commenced on or after the date of 
        enactment of this Act; and
            (2) insofar as is just and practicable, to any proceeding 
        pending on such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
Slip-Op. 02-92

 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: THE HONORABLE GREGORY W. CARMAN, CHIEF JUDGE

____________________________________

:

FORMER EMPLOYEES OF :

LEVI STRAUSS, :

:

 Plaintiffs, :

:

v. : Court No. 00-11-00522

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :

:

Defendant. :

:

____________________________________:

JUDGMENT ORDER

Upon consideration of the failure to prosecute this action with due diligence by Plaintiffs,

appearing pro se, despite being provided notice by this Court of Plaintiffs’ need to timely file a

USCIT R. 56.1 Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record, it is hereby,

ORDERED that this case is dismissed pursuant to USCIT R. 41(b)(3).

______________________________

Gregory W. Carman, 

Chief Judge

Dated: August 21, 2002

New York, New York
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Arizona Gold and Onyx Mining Company f/k/a Viking Capital Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Michael Mitsunage, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS.
1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



May
8, 2018



| | /s/
    Michael Mitsunage                  
| | -------------------------------------------
| | Michael
    Mitsunage                      
| | (Chief
    Executive Officer and President)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.