alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





I,
Francis J. Elenio, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wilshire
Enterprises, Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)       Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




b)       Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of this period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c)       Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):









a)       All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b)       Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:  April
30, 2009





/s/ Francis J. ElenioFrancis
      J. ElenioChief
      Financial Officer




-2-
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 214

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that small and minorityowned businesses in the United States should be involved in rebuilding Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2003

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. WYNN, 

Ms. KILPATRICK, and Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business, and in addition to the Committee on International Relations, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

small and minority-owned businesses in the United 

States should be involved in rebuilding Iraq.

Whereas Iraq is liberated and is once more in the hands of 

the citizens of Iraq; 

Whereas the citizens of Iraq are once again in control of their 

own destiny; 

Whereas much damage has been done to Iraq, its infrastructure, its environment, and its industrial capacity; 

Whereas reconstruction of Iraq’s economy is desperately 

needed; 
2

•HRES 214 IH 

Whereas small and minority-owned businesses in the United 

States have expressed interest in helping the Iraqis rebuild their country; and 

Whereas small and minority-owned businesses lack the resources to hire lobbyists, international consultants, and 

former diplomats to represent their interests, and promote their products and services in Iraq: Now, therefore, 

be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the United States Government should be ac4 tively involved in promoting United States small and 

5 minority-owned businesses to help rebuild Iraq; 

6 (2) the Administrator of the Small Business 

7 Administration, the Secretary of Commerce, the Sec8 retary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the 

9 Administrator of the United States Agency for 

10 International Development should cooperate in pro11 viding assistance to United States small and minor12 ity-owned businesses seeking to become involved in 

13 the rebuilding of Iraq; and 

14 (3) the Administrator of the Small Business 

15 Administration should conduct a public information 

16 campaign to advise United States small and minor17 ity-owned businesses with respect to becoming in18 volved in the rebuilding of Iraq.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofGreat Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Deborah A. Wensel, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(3)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(4)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Deborah A. Wensel                                     |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Deborah  A. Wensel                                         |
| Chief  Financial Officer                                   |
| Date:        August 12, 2004 |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Great Lakes Dredge & DockCorporation and will be retained by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

34

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  January 13, 2011 | Signed:  /s/  "Donald M. Boone"   
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                        | Donald M. Boone,
President and CEO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0367

THE CITY OF MISSOULA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRIANNE NICOLE RANA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 4, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 27 2020

11/27/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0367
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             463
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,699
<PP&E>                                       4,939,913
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,804,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,200,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,730
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,200,863
<SALES>                                         87,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,450
<CGS>                                           29,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,108
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,108
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  CINEMARK USA, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Robert CoppleRobert CoppleChief Financial Officer
Order entered April 24, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01121 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 01122 - CR OSCAR PEREACRUZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F18 - 00276 - S & F18 - 00275 - S



### O RDER Before the Court are appellant’s April 22, 2019 motions for extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motions and ORDER appellant’ s brief filed by June 6, 2019

. /s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          17,817
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          15,362
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    622,698
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,325,400
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,068,197
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,317,992
<SHORT-TERM>                                   254,569
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            315,001
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           116
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,068,197
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 47,293
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,722
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,011
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                67,026
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              30,339
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,067
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,959
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      162
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 656
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 25,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,017
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,017
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.75
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,344
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,170
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      117
<RECOVERIES>                                        44
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,259
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,698
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,561
        

</TABLE>
#### HESCH v. ERIE R. CO.

Civ. No. 28738.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio.

June 2, 1952.

*519Edward L. Williams, Youngstown, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Manchester, Bennett, Powers & Ullman, John H. Ranz, Youngstown, Ohio, for defendant.

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, Title 45, U.S.C.A. §§ 51-60. Defendant has filed objections to plaintiff’s interrogatories 14, 15 and 21.

The challenged interrogatories go to proper matters of discovery and should be answered. The request for documents in connection with the interrogatories raises a more serious problem, however.

While this court ordinarily will not order the production of documents in connection with interrogatories served under Rule 33, in the present case there has been some showing of the good cause required by Rule 34. Much of the information concerning this lawsuit is within the exclusive knowledge of the defendant. It alone had an opportunity to take statements of the witnesses at the time of the accident and the testimony of the injured employee has been lost by his death. Under these circumstances, I think that the Administratrix is entitled to the statements of the wit-, nesses.

Respecting written notice to defendant, if any, as to the number of cars which could be placed on the siding, it also would be in the possession of defendant, and it appears doubtful that it can be obtained from any other source.

The discovery proceedings will be facilitated by ordering production presently without requiring the filing of a new motion under Rule 34. Defendant need only produce the requested documents for inspection and copying, however. If plaintiff desires copies, she must make them at her own expense.

Objections overruled.
IV 

House Calendar No. 54

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 255

[Report No. 108–136] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 4) proposing 

an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing 

the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2003

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

4) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the 

United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the 

physical desecration of the flag of the United States.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. 

4 Res. 4) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of 

5 the United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the 
2

HRES 255 RH 

1 physical desecration of the flag of the United States. The 

2 joint resolution shall be considered as read for amend3 ment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

4 on the joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to 

5 final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two 

6 hours of debate on the joint resolution equally divided and 

7 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

8 of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) an amendment in 

9 the nature of a substitute offered by Representative Con10 yers of Michigan or his designee, which shall be considered 

11 as read and shall be separately debatable for one hour 

12 equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

13 opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 

14 instructions. 

House Calendar No. 54

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 255

[Report No. 108–136] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 4) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States. 

JUNE 2, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                              WYMAN-GORDON COMPANY
                              FISCAL 1998 FORM 10-K




                      WYMAN-GORDON COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES



         The following is a list of Wyman-Gordon's subsidiaries as of May 31,
1998:


                                                                PLACE OF
                                                                INCORPORATION
       NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                       OR ORGANIZATION
       ------------------                                       ---------------

Cameron Forged Products Limited                                 United Kingdom

Cypress Extrusion Press Corporation                             Delaware

ForCast FSC, Ltd.                                               Virgin Islands

International Extruded Products, LLC                            New York

Precision Founders, Inc.                                        California

Reisner Metals, Inc.                                            California

Scaled Composites, Inc.                                         California

Scaled Manufacturing, Inc.                                      Delaware

Wyman-Gordon Composites, Inc.                                   Delaware

Wyman-Gordon Composite Technologies, Inc.                       California

Wyman-Gordon Forgings, Inc.                                     Delaware

Wyman-Gordon Investment Castings, Inc.                          Delaware

Wyman-Gordon Limited                                            United Kingdom/
                                                                Delaware

Wyman-Gordon Receivables Corporation                            Delaware