alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15232 and #15233; IOWA Disaster Number IA-00071]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Iowa dated 08/03/2017.
 DATES: Issued on 08/03/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/02/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/03/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. *Incident:*
                     Severe Weather, Tornadoes, High Winds, Heavy Rains, Flash Flooding and Riverine Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                     07/19/2017 through 07/23/2017. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Bremer *Contiguous Counties:* Iowa: Black Hawk, Buchanan, Butler, Chickasaw, Fayette, Floyd The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.500Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.750( print page 37650)Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.610Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15232 6 and for economic injury is 15233 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Iowa. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: August 3, 2017. Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2017-16955 Filed 8-10-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**ICIM Services***Partners in Risk Management*

 

Novermber 21, 2007

 

Mr. Scott Stroh  Legal Counsel  Saturna Capital Corporation  1300 N. State Street  Bellingham, WA 98225

 

**RE: ICI Mutual Investment Company Blanket Bond No. 89265106B ("Bond")****D&O/E&O Liability Insurance Policy No. 89265107D ("Policy")**

Dear Mr Stroh:

As discussed, ICI Mutual recommends the following premium allocation for the  above-  referenced Bond. As you know, our allocation is only a recommendation, and the  ultimate  responsibility for the allocation of premiums rests with Insured management.

| **Insureds**                                                                                         | **Bond Premium         Allocation** | **Policy Premium         Allocation** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Non-Funds        • Saturna Capital Corporation        • Saturna Brokerage Services, Inc. | 20%                                 | 50%                                   |
| Funds • Amana Mutual Funds Trust • Saturna      Investment Trust                         | 80%                                 | 50%                                   |

I am hereby confirming that, under the above-allocation methodology, the share  of total  premiums allocated to each Investment Company ("Company") is less  than the amount  each Company would pay if it had purchased separate bonds from ICI Mutual with  the same limit of liability

Regards,

/s/Maggie Sullivan  Senior Underwriter

 

 

 

*1401 H Street, NW • Washington, DC  2005 • 800.643.4246 • Fax: 202.682.2425*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          30,670
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          32,531
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    499,960
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,272,958
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,942,636
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,267,402
<SHORT-TERM>                                   123,300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            370,882
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           116
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,942,636
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,875
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,891
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,731
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                32,497
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,639
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,754
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,743
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       50
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 377
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,517
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,517
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,601
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.73
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,670
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,350
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       59
<RECOVERIES>                                         5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,346
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,406
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,940
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 282

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 18, 2003.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1528) to amend the

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to protect taxpayers and ensure accountability of the Internal Revenue Service. The bill

shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment

recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now

printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in

part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. All

points of order against the bill, as amended, are waived. The

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill,

as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of

debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) the further amendment printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules, if of-
2

•HRES 282 EH

fered by Representative Rangel of New York or his designee,

which shall be in order without intervention of any point of

order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the

proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit
32.1
 
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Xedar Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies,
to such officer’s knowledge, that:
  (i) the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 March 27,
2008                                                               
   By:    /s/ Hugh H. Williamson, III
 
 Hugh H. Williamson, III
 President and
Chief Executive Officer
 Xedar
Corporation
**SATURNA INVESTMENT TRUST**

**POWER OFATTORNEY**

 The undersigned  Trustees of SaturnaInvestment Trust, a "Massachusetts" BusinessTrustorganized under the laws of the State of Washington,proposing to file with the Securities and ExchangeCommission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,one or more amendments to the Registration Statementon Form N-1A and related Amendments to theRegistration Statement of the Trust under the InvestmentCompany Act of 1940("Amendments") do hereby separately and severally appointand constitute Nicholas F. Kaiser, whose signatureappears below:  

***/s/ Nicholas F. Kaiser*****NicholasF. Kaiser**

his true and lawful attorney for him and in his name,place and stead to sign in the capacity of a Trustee of the Trust suchAmendments and any and all additional amendments thereto, and to file suchamendments and all instruments necessary or incidental thereto with theSecurities and Exchange Commission under such 1933 and 1940 Acts.    

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand and seal this 12thday of December, 2007.

*/s/ Gary A. Goldfogel* Gary A.Goldfogel 

*/s/ John E. Love* John E. Love        

*/s/ John S. Moore* John S. Moore					

*/s/ Herbert Grubel*Herbert Grubel
Order entered August 19, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00465-CV

DOUGLAS SPICER, Appellant

V.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09281

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s August 15, 2013 motion to extend time to file reply 

brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the reply brief tendered by appellant 

on August 9, 2013 be timely filed as of today’s date.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
THRIVENT MUTUAL FUNDS
625 Fourth Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN   55415

June 29, 2006

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:            Thrivent Mutual Funds-- Rule 497(j) Filing
                      (File Nos. 033-12911 and 811-5075)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Thrivent Mutual Funds (the "Registrant") filed via EDGAR on April 28, 2006, an electronically  signed copy of Post-Effective  Amendment
No. 60 to the Registration  Statement on Form N-1A (the  "Registration  Statement")  complete with exhibits filed therewith pursuant to
Rule 485(a) of the General Rules and Regulations  (the "1933 Act Rules") of the Securities and Exchange  Commission  promulgated  under
the Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  and under the  Investment  Company Act of 1940, as amended.  On June 27, 2006, the Registrant
filed via EDGAR  pursuant to Rule 497 the  prospectus  of the  Thrivent  High Yield Fund II and the combined  statement  of  additional
information for the Registrant.

In accordance with the provisions of Rule 497(j) of the 1933 Act Rules,  this letter serves to certify that the following  prospectuses
contained  in the  Registration  Statement  do not differ  from that which  would have been filed  pursuant to Rule 497 of the 1933 Act
Rules:  Thrivent  Aggressive  Allocation Fund,  Thrivent  Moderately  Aggressive  Allocation Fund,  Thrivent Moderate  Allocation Fund,
Thrivent  Moderately  Conservative  Allocation Fund, Thrivent Technology Fund, Thrivent Partner Small Cap Growth Fund, Thrivent Partner
Small Cap Value Fund,  Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund,  Thrivent Small Cap Index Fund,  Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund,  Thrivent  Partner
Mid Cap Value Fund,  Thrivent  Mid Cap Stock Fund,  Thrivent  Mid Cap Index  Fund,  Thrivent  Mid Cap Index  Fund-I,  Thrivent  Partner
International  Stock Fund,  Thrivent  Large Cap Growth Fund,  Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund,  Thrivent  Large Cap Stock Fund,  Thrivent
Large Cap Index Fund,  Thrivent Large Cap Index Fund-I,  Thrivent  Balanced  Fund,  Thrivent High Yield Fund,  Thrivent  Municipal Bond
Fund, Thrivent Income Fund, Thrivent Core Bond Fund, Thrivent Limited Maturity Bond Fund, Thrivent Money Market Fund, and Thrivent U.S.
Government Zero Coupon Target Fund, Series 2006.

Should the staff have any questions regarding the foregoing, please contact the undersigned (612) 340-4249.

Very truly yours,


/s/ David S. Royal
David S. Royal
Attorney
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 293 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 24, 2003.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2555) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the 
bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with 
section 501 of House Concurrent Resolution 95 and clause 2 of rule XXI are 
waived except as follows: sections 514, 521, and 522. During consideration of 
the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
ex101.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

     

    To the
Board,

     

    I am
resigning my position on the board of directors and as audit committee chair
effective immediately.

     

    Due to
circumstances beyond it's control, the company's normal operations were
interrupted, causing the audit work to be postponed
indefinitely. 

     

    In such a
situation, I find I cannot complete the required auditing and feel I must
resign. 

     

    I urgent
the company to resume normal business operations as soon as possible and
return the employees to work.

     

    /s/ Alice
Lee Rogers

    
      
        
 

    

    Alice Lee
Rogers
# Fourth Court of A ppeals San Antonio, Texas

December 20, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00663

- CV

$16,370.00 U.S. CURRENCY

,

Appellant

v.

STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CI14611 Honorable Rosie Alvarado , Judge Pre siding



### O R D E R

Appellant Jorge Perez’s brief was due on December 16 , 202 2

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). T o date, Appellant has not filed the brief or a motion for extension of time to file the
brief.

We ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within FIF T E EN DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a) , 42.3(b), (c); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio , 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1998, no pet.) . Appellant’s written response must include a reasonable explanation for Appellant’s failure to timely file the brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a).
If Appellant fail s to show cause as ordered, this appeal will be di smissed without
further notice. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Elizondo , 975 S.W.2d at 63

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of December, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
IV 

House Calendar No. 19

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 172

[Report No. 108–57] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1559) making emergency wartime 

supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2003, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2003

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1559) making 

emergency wartime supplemental appropriations for the 

fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, and for other 

purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 1559) making emergency wartime 

6 supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending 
2

HRES 172 RH 

1 September 30, 2003, and for other purposes. The first 

2 reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 

3 order against consideration of the bill are waived. General 

4 debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 

5 one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman 

6 and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appro7 priations. After general debate the bill shall be considered 

8 for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of order 

9 against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with 

10 clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of 

11 the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee 

12 of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the 

13 basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has 

14 caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional 

15 Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule 

16 XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 

17 read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 

18 amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill 

19 to the House with such amendments as may have been 

20 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or21 dered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 

22 without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

23 with or without instructions. 

House Calendar No. 19

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 172

[Report No. 108–57] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1559) 

making emergency wartime supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, and for other purposes. 

APRIL 2, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
Cite as 2014 Ark. 339



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No 

## . CV-14-485

BENJAMIN OLIVER PETITIONER
V. RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION RESPONDENT Opinion DeliveredJuly 31, 2014

PRO SE MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL OF ORDER [LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 39CV-13-4] HONORABLE L.T. SIMES, JUDGE

MOTION DENIED.

PER CURIAM In 2013, petitioner Benjamin Oliver filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court in Lee County where he is incarcerated. 1 The circuit court denied the petition. No appeal was taken, and petitioner now seeks leave to proceed with a belated appeal. Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Civil 4(a) (2013) requires that a notice of appeal be filed within thirty days of the date an order is entered. Petitioner contends that he did not file a timely notice of appeal because he was not promptly notified by the circuit clerk that the order had been entered. A petitioner has the right to appeal a ruling on a petition for postconviction relief, which includes the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Sillivan v. Hobbs , 2014 Ark. 88 (per curiam); McDaniel v. Hobbs , 2013 Ark. 107 (per curiam); Wesley v. Harmon , 2010 Ark. 21 (per

1 As of the date of this opinion, petitioner remains incarcerated at the prison facility in Lee County.Cite as 2014 Ark. 339

curiam); McClain v. Norris , 2009 Ark. 428 (per curiam). If the petitioner fails to file a timely notice of appeal, a belated appeal will not be allowed absent a showing by the petitioner of good cause for the failure to comply with proper procedure. McDaniel , 2013 Ark. 107; Wesley , 2010 Ark. 21; Garner v. State , 293 Ark. 309, 737 S.W.2d 637 (1987) (per curiam). Even if the order was not promptly forwarded to petitioner, that fact in itself does not constitute good cause for petitioner’s failure to follow procedure. In contrast to the denial of a petition for postconviction relief under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2013), 2 there is no absolute duty imposed in the statute on a judge or clerk to notify a petitioner that a petition for writ of habeas corpus has been denied. Wesley , 2010 Ark. 21; McClain , 2009 Ark. 428; Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-112-101 to -123 (Repl. 2006). Our law imposes a duty on lawyers and litigants to exercise reasonable diligence to keep up with the status of cases. Wesley , 2010 Ark. 21; McClain , 2009 Ark. 428. The pro se litigant receives no special consideration in this regard. Wesley , 2010 Ark. 21; see also Tarry v. State , 346 Ark. 267, 57 S.W.3d 163 (2001) (per curiam). It is not the responsibility of the circuit clerk, or anyone other than the party desiring to appeal, to perfect the appeal. Day v. Hobbs , 2014 Ark. 189 (per curiam). It was the duty of petitioner to file a timely notice of appeal, and he has not established good cause for his failure to do so. Motion denied. Benjamin Oliver

, pro se petitioner. No response.

2 Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.3(d) places an obligation upon the circuit court to promptly mail a copy of the order to the petitioner.
2