alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                          FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


From time to time, the Company may publish forward-looking
statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial
performance, business prospects, capital expenditures,
technological developments, new products, research and development
activities and similar matters.  The Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking
statements.  In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor,
the Company notes that a variety of important factors could cause
the Company's actual results and experience to differ materially
from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the
Company's forward-looking statements.  The important factors that
may affect the operations, performance, development and results of
the Company's business include the following:

-     In those markets where the Company maintains market
      leadership, it will most likely retain preferred retail space
      allocation which enhance results.

-     Availability, pricing and sourcing of raw materials has been
      relatively stable and a competitive advantage but failure to
      maintain these could negatively impact results.

-     The Company has historically been successful marketing to
      different segments of the population.  Failure to adequately
      anticipate and react to changing demographics and product
      preferences could negatively impact results.

-     Both manufacturing and sales of a significant portion of the
      Company's products are outside the United States and could be
      negatively impacted by volatile foreign currencies and
      markets.

-     The Company competes worldwide with other well established
      manufacturers of chewing gum.  The Company's results may be
      negatively impacted by a failure of new or existing products
      to be favorably received, by ineffective advertising, or by
      failure to sufficiently counter aggressive competitive
      actions.

-     Underutilization of or inadequate manufacturing capacity due
      to unanticipated movements in consumer demands could
      materially affect manufacturing efficiencies and costs.

-     Discounting and other competitive actions may make it more
      difficult for the Company to maintain its historically strong
      operating margins.

-     Governmental regulations with respect to import duties,
      tariffs and environmental controls, both in and outside the
      U.S., could negatively impact the Company's costs and ability
      to compete in domestic or foreign markets.

-     The Company has not had any material labor stoppages,
      nevertheless, such disputes or strikes could negatively affect
      shipments from suppliers or shipment of finished product.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN DOE, a minor, by his mother 

and next friend, Jane Doe nfr Jane

Doe,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

JOSEPHINE HELELANI PAUAHI

RABAGO,

Intervenor,

v.

KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS/BERNICE

PAUAHI BISHOP ESTATE; CONSTANCE

LAU, in her capacity as Trustee of No. 04-15044 the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice

Pauahi Bishop Estate; NAINOA D.C. No. 

THOMPSON, in his capacity as CV-03-00316-ACK

Trustee of the Kamehameha ORDER

Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop

Estate; DIANE J. PLOTTS, in her

capacity as Trustee of the

Kamehameha Schools/Bernice

Pauahi Bishop Estate; ROBERT

K.U. KIHUNE, in his capacity as

Trustee of the Kamehameha

Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop

Estate; J. DOUGLAS ING, in his

capacity as Trustee of the

Kamehameha Schools/Bernice

Pauahi Bishop Estate,

Defendants-Appellees. 

2029
Filed February 22, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active

judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by

the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The threejudge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to

this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to

the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1

Judge Clifton is recused. 

2030 DOE v. KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2006 Thomson/West.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): June 7, 2018





Vail Resorts, Inc.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)





Delaware001-0961451-0291762(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)390 Interlocken CrescentBroomfield, Colorado80021(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(303) 404-1800





Not Applicable(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


[  ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[  ] Soliciting materials pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[  ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[  ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company  ̈


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ̈











---










Item 2.02.  Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On June 7, 2018, Vail Resorts, Inc. issued a press release announcing its results for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2018.  A copy of the press release is being furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(d) Exhibits.





A list of exhibits furnished herewith is contained on the Exhibit Index which immediately precedes such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.














---










SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Vail Resorts, Inc.Date: June 7, 2018By:/s/ Michael Z. BarkinMichael Z. BarkinExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer











EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1Press Release, dated June 7, 2018, announcing fiscal 2018 third quarter results.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, FOR ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  715,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               846,094
<PP&E>                                         161,353
<DEPRECIATION>                                 156,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 850,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,445,162
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,225,002
<COMMON>                                       261,205
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,877,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   850,935
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,462,983
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,637,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               100,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (274,976)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (274,976)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (274,976)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1991-C, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,592
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  76,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               78,505
<PP&E>                                         4,177,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,942,349)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,313,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,723
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,308,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,313,216
<SALES>                                        69,425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               69,664
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  37,171<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                17,114
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            17,114
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   17,114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes gene al and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
** **

**ExhibitNo. 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF ACCOUNTANTS**

 

September28, 2012

 

U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission

Divisionof Corporation Finance

450Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington,D.C. 20549

 

 

Re:Catalyst Resource Group, Inc. - Form 10-K/A for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2011.

 

DearSir or Madame:

 

AsIndependent Registered Certified Public Accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K/A ofour audited report on the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2010 for Catalyst Resource Group, Inc. and to all references to our firmincluded in this report.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/M&K CPAS, PLLC

CertifiedPublic Accountants
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Donald M. Boone, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jewett Cameron Trading Company Ltd;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date), and

c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date:



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:April 14, 2004



/s/ Donald M. Boone

Donald M. Boone, President/CEO/Director
[No. 55207-4-I.

Division One.

November 7, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. James Marion Black, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-05810-4, James D. Cayce, J., entered October 5, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1292
WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID LEMMON, Colonel, Defendant - Appellee, and STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (6:06-cv-00169) Submitted: October 15, 2007 Decided: October 23, 2007 Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Grottendieck Lanham, John A. Hoyer, STATE POLICE LEGAL COUNSEL, South Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: William Cunningham appeals a district court order and judgment order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil rights complaint challenging provisions of the West Virginia Sex Offender Registration Act (“Act”), West Va. Code Ann. §§ 15-12-1 - 15-12-10 (LexisNexis 2004 & Supp. 2007). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. SeeCunningham v. Lemmon , No. 6:06-cv-00169 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 22, 2007). Cunningham has filed motions to certify questions to the United States Supreme Court and to file a supplemental informal brief. We deny the motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Kees, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Date: November 12, 2009



/S/ ROBERT L. KEESRobert L. KeesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal financial officer)




30
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11008 Conference Calendar

LESTER JON RUSTON Petitioner-Appellant

v. ALBERTO R GONZALES, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CV-1350
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Lester Jon Ruston, federal prisoner # 26834-177, mo ves this court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal following the dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. R uston’s motion is construed as a challenge to the district court’s determination that the appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). This court’s inquiry intowhether the appeal is taken in good faith “is limited towhether theNo. 06-11008

2 appeal involves ‘legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).’” H oward v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (citation omitted). If the appeal is frivolous, this court may dismiss it sua sponte under 5 T H C IR
. R. 42.2. Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24. Ruston has not shown that the district court erred in dismissing his § 2241 petition without prejudice. R uston is not entitled to habeas relief based on conclusional allegations that it is not possible to raise his claims in the pending criminal case due to fraud and judicial and prosecutorial misconduct. See Koch
v. Puckett, 907 F.2d 524, 530 (5th Cir. 1990). Ruston’s request for IFP status is denied, and his appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5

TH C IR
. R. 42.2. Ruston’s motions for production, for contempt of court, for judicial notice, and to disqualify the judges of this court are also denied. IFP DENIED; MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Government Ethics

# AGENCY:

Office of Government Ethics (OGE).

# ACTION:

Notice of request for public comment.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) is providing notice of request for public comment on its draft Strategic Plan (Plan). The Plan describes OGE's priorities for the next five years. OGE will consider all comments received by the deadline. You may access the Plan at                         *https://www.oge.gov/​web/​OGE.nsf/​News+​Releases/​B0EE73EF1ADC7AF38525816F0075CB6F?​opendocument,*                         or you may obtain a copy of the plan by sending an email request to                         *OGEStrategicPlan@oge.gov.*

# DATES:

All comments must be received by August 25, 2017.

# ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments by any of the following methods: 

*Email: OGEStrategicPlan@oge.gov.*

*Mail, Hand Delivery/Courier:*                         U.S. Office of Government Ethics, Suite 500, 1201 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20005-3917, Attention: Nicole Stein, OGE Strategic Plan.                    

*Instructions:*                         All submissions must include OGE's agency name and the words “Strategic Plan.” All comments, including attachments and other supporting materials, will become part of the public record and subject to public disclosure. Comments may be posted on OGE's Web site,                         *www.oge.gov.*                         Sensitive personal information, such as account numbers or Social Security numbers, should not be included. Comments generally will not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Nicole Stein, Chief, Agency Assistance Branch, U.S. Office of Government Ethics, Suite 500, 1201 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20005-3917; Telephone (202) 482-9255; TTY: 800-877-8339; Email:                         *nicole.stein@oge.gov.*

Dated: August 8, 2017.

David J. Apol,

Acting Director, U.S. Office of Government Ethics.

[FR Doc. 2017-17032 Filed 8-11-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6345-03-P
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3065412-OCT-201108:24 AM