alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           3,454
<SECURITIES>                                     5,850
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     37,485
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,180
<PP&E>                                         439,421
<DEPRECIATION>                               (190,324)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 342,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,570
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       172,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   342,140
<SALES>                                        306,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               326,373
<CGS>                                          242,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  301,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                               LETTER OF CONSENT

                        CONSENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

    As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 relating to the stock
incentive plans of The Wiser Oil Company (the "Company"), (Nos. 33-44171, 33-
62441, 33-44172, 333-22525 and 333-15083), of certain data from our report
entitled "The Wiser Oil Company Canada Ltd. Reserve Appraisal and Economic
Evaluation effective January 1, 1998" with respect to the oil and gas reserves
of the Company, the future net revenues therefrom and present values
attributable to these reserves included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and
to all references to our firm included in this Annual Report.

                                       Yours very truly,

                                       GILBERT LAUSTSEN JUNG ASSOCIATES LTD.

                                       /s/ Wayne W. Chow, P. Eng.
                                       Vice-President

March 27, 1998
Calgary, Canada
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Adam C. Fletcher, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 877]

Present—Smith, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Green, JJ.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 20, 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00007

- CV

Alvie Campbell, Appellant

v.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTI CE JONES, JUSTICES R OSE AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on January 3, 2012 . Having

re viewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The appellant

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Cou rt and the court below.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 24, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Peter L. Lynch
|Peter L. Lynch    
|                  
|August 24, 2009
No. 1070.

#### Trucco *v.*Erie Railroad Co.

May 13, 1946.

*Edward E. Petrillo*for peti*844tioner.

*843Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania denied.

*844
      *E. Lowry Humes*for respondent.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), William H. Armstrong III, as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 17, 2004





/s/ William H. Armstrong III



William H. Armstrong III

Chairman of the Board, President and

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 881

To disapprove certain sentencing guideline amendments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2003

Mr. COBLE (for himself, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. HYDE, Mr. SMITH of 

Texas, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. JENKINS, Mr. 

CANNON, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr. 

KELLER, Ms. HART, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. PENCE, Mr. FORBES, Mr. KING

of Iowa, Mr. CARTER, Mr. FEENEY, and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To disapprove certain sentencing guideline amendments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness in Sentencing 

5 Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 881 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DISAPPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS RELATING TO 

2 PROVIDING A MAXIMUM BASE OFFENSE 

3 LEVEL UNDER SECTION 2D1.1(A)(3) IF THE DE4 FENDANT RECEIVES A MITIGATING ROLE AD5 JUSTMENT UNDER SECTION 3B1.2. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, section 

7 2D1.1(a)(3), and the Commentary to section 3B1.2, of the 

8 Sentencing Guidelines are amended to read as they read 

9 without regard to the effect of Amendment 4 of the 

10 ‘‘Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines, Policy State11 ments, and Official Commentary’’ submitted by the 

12 United States Sentencing Commission to Congress on May 

13 1, 2002.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     financial  statements  included in Envirosource's  Form 10-K for the fiscal
     year ended  December  31, 1998 and is  qualified in its entirety by 
     reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               5,134
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       33,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,045
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    40,959
<PP&E>                                             304,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                     157,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     387,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               41,403
<BONDS>                                            298,023
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               291
<OTHER-SE>                                           9,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       387,456
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   232,376
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      186,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (14,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        16,384
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (30,639)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (30,639)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (5.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (5.27)
        


</TABLE>
Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinion s filed August 20 , 2024

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00881

- CV

RONALD SCOTT CATT , Appellant

V.
BRIAN MIDDLETON IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FORT BEND COUNTY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 22

- DCV

- 290442

CONCURRING OPINION I write separately to point out that Catt has filed a partial record and designated points or issues

. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6 (c)(1). The majority should, but does not, analyze whether Catt’s appellate argument s fall within those designated points or issues

. See Mason v. Our Lady Star of the Sea Catholic Church , 154 S.W.3d 816 , 818

– 820 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (citing Christiansen v. Prezelski , 782 S.W.2d 842, 843 (Tex. 1990)2 (interpreting former 1986 Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 53(d) , 49 Tex. B.J. 556, 573

– 74 (1986 ) (since amended) ) )

. Catt should not be given special treatment because he is a pro se litigant , and we should not reach the merits of points or issues that are not properly before us

. I concur in the judgment.

/s / Charles A. Spain Justice

P anel consists of Justices Spain , Poissant , and Wilson

. (Poissant, J., majority).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from the WHX
Corporation  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  as of December 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                          10,775
<SECURITIES>                                                   659,356
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  143,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    (2,306)
<INVENTORY>                                                    441,869
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             1,267,713
<PP&E>                                                       1,363,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 547,059
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               2,673,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          973,437
<BONDS>                                                        847,720
<COMMON>                                                           141
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                        589
<OTHER-SE>                                                     376,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 2,673,566
<SALES>                                                      1,716,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             1,716,800
<CGS>                                                        1,430,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                1,677,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              87,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (22,264)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (6,430)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (15,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    896
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (14,938)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (2.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (2.24)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial officer of Peoples  Bancorporation,  Inc., each hereby certifies that,
to the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-Q of the issuer fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)or  15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

November 10, 2004

                             s/R. Riggie Ridgeway
                             ------------------------------------------------
                             R. Riggie Ridgeway
                             Chief Executive Officer


                             s/Robert E. Dye, Jr.
                             ------------------------------------------------
                             Robert E. Dye, Jr.
                             Chief Financial Officer
Order entered January 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01233-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF X.C.J., JR.

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-07173

ORDER

Before the Court is Jeffrey W. Ermis’s January 3, 2019 motion to withdraw as counsel 

for appellee. The motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to remove 

Jeffrey W. Ermis as counsel for appellee. All future communications with appellee shall be 

directed to:

Ms. Akeya Peoples

570 Bridle Path Apt. 1116

Grand Prairie, Texas 75050

(381) 512-7924.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District 

APRIL 23, 2014  THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b).   1. Case No.  SD32546   Re: JAY RAMSEY,   Movant-Appellant,   v.   STATE OF MISSOURI,   Respondent-Respondent.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J. Jesus VEGA-ARROYO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50482.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Dec. 31, 2012.

W. Mark Conover, I, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*504Lynn Howard Ball, Law Office of Lynn H. Ball, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

J. Jesus Vega-Arroyo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the consecutive eight-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Vega-Arroyo contends that the district court plainly erred by failing to discuss the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors. The district court did not err, because it was not required to “tick off’ all of the relevant sentencing factors, *see United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc), and the record reflects that the court considered the relevant section 3583(e) sentencing factors. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583(e).

Vega-Arroyo also contends that the district court plainly erred by punishing him for the criminal conduct that resulted in the revocation of his supervised release. The record reflects that the district court properly sanctioned Vega-Arroyo for his breach of trust, and not for the criminal conduct underlying the revocation. *See United States v. Miqbel,*444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1169

GEORGE OSAM PINANKO; STELLA OPOKU,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary, Department of Homeland 

Security; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director, U.S. Citizenship and 

Immigration Services; SARAH TAYLOR, Director, Washington 

District Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:10-cv-01138-LMB-TRJ)

Submitted: October 12, 2011 Decided: October 21, 2011

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, 

Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States 

Attorney, Anna E. Cross, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

George Osam Pinanko and Stella Opoku appeal the 

district court’s order dismissing with prejudice their Petition 

for Writ of Mandamus or for Review of Agency Action under the 

Administrative Procedure Act. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See Pinanko v. 

Napolitano, No. 1:10-cv-01138-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2011). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

y1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143635 

_________________________________________ 

In re MILDRED WENDT REVOCABLE TRUST. 

_________________________________________ 

RICHARD WENDT, as the Successor Trustee of 

the MILDRED WENDT REVOCABLE TRUST, 

Appellee, 

v SC: 143635 

 COA: 298391 

St. Clair Probate Court 

MICHAEL BISSETT, as the Personal LC No. 2009-000300-TV 

Representative of the Estate of JEAN WENDT, 

Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 21, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
      15.1



























August
      11, 2005




Securities
      and Exchange Commission


450
      Fifth
      Street, N.W.


Washington,
      D.C. 20549




Commissioners:






We
      are
      aware that our report dated August 11, 2005 on our review of interim financial
      information of Stratus Properties Inc. for each of the three-month and six-month
      periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and included in the Company's Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated by
      reference in the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.
      33-78798, 333-31059, 333-52995 and 333-104288).






Yours
      very truly,






/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP