alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re: TOSHIBA AMERICA HD DVD MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION.

MDL No. 1956.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

Aug. 18, 2008.

Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., KATHRYN H. VRATIL and DAVID R. HANSEN, Judges of the Panel.

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel: Plaintiff in one District of New Jersey action has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the District of New Jersey. Defendant Toshiba America Consumer Products, L.L.C. (Toshiba) supports the motion.

This litigation currently consists of four actions listed on Schedule A and pending in three districts, two actions in the District of New Jersey and one action each in the Southern District of Illinois and the Eastern District of Michigan.1

*1377On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we find that these actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the District of New Jersey will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. These actions allege overlapping nationwide class actions, each revolving around Toshiba’s representations and conduct with respect to the viability of its HD DVD format. Centralization under Section 1407 will eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, especially with respect to class certification; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary.

We are persuaded that the District of New Jersey is an appropriate transferee forum for this litigation. Toshiba’s headquarters are located in New Jersey, and relevant discovery will likely be located there. Furthermore, this choice is supported by all parties.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the actions listed on Schedule A and pending outside the District of New Jersey are transferred to the District of New Jersey and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dickinson R. Debevoise for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending there and listed on Schedule A.

SCHEDULE A

MDL No. 1956 — IN RE: TOSHIBA AMERICA HD DVD MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

*Southern District of Illinois*

*Bradley J. Kreisler v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC, et al.,*C.A. No. 3:08-260

*Eastern District of Michigan*

*Jack West, et al. v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC,*C.A. No. 2:08-10807

*District of New Jersey*

*Mark Risi v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC, et al.,*C.A. No. 2:08-939

*Mitchell Kohl v. Toshiba Corp., et al.,*C.A. No. 2:08-1505

1

. The Panel has been notified that two other related actions have been filed, one action in the Central District of California and one ac*1377tion in District of Idaho. These actions will be treated as potential tag-along actions. *See*Rules 7.4 and 7.5, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001).
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 374 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 374

To amend the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 to 
 extend the requirement of the Secretary to furnish hospital care and 
medical services through non-Department of Veterans Affairs entities to 
                veterans residing in certain locations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 2015

  Mrs. Shaheen (for herself and Ms. Ayotte) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 to 
 extend the requirement of the Secretary to furnish hospital care and 
medical services through non-Department of Veterans Affairs entities to 
                veterans residing in certain locations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE NON-DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS CARE TO VETERANS RESIDING IN CERTAIN 
              LOCATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (p)(1) of section 101 of the Veterans 
Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-146; 38 
U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking ``care and services'' and 
inserting ``care or services to an eligible veteran described in 
subparagraph (A), (B), or (D) of subsection (b)(2)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Such section is further amended--
            (1) in subsection (p), in the subsection heading, by 
        inserting ``to Certain Veterans'' after ``Services''; and
            (2) in subsection (q)(2)(F), by striking ``termination''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10QSB FOR OPHTHALMICF IMAGING SYSTEMS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                         335,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,708,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,353,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,491,720
<PP&E>                                       1,112,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                 701,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,971,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,279,808
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,545,677
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,853,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,971,966
<SALES>                                      3,169,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,169,653
<CGS>                                        1,983,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,983,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,852,950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (694,316)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (694,316)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (694,316)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**          The undersigned executive officer of Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc. (the “Registrant”) herebycertifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Registrant.                                                  /s/ Douglas J. Timmerman   Douglas J. Timmerman, Chairman of the Board, President   and Chief Executive Officer   November 6, 2007**Note:**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 has been provided to Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc. and will be retained by AnchorBanCorp Wisconsin Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
43
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6316

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EARL E. RICHARDSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge. (CR-96-122, CA-03-149-3)

Submitted: April 18, 2003 Decided: May 22, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl E. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Earl E. Richardson, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are

debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert.

denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Richardson has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would no aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
| I. | Attributes of Share Classes |
|----|-----------------------------|

1

|   | A. | Front-Payment Shares |
|--------|----|----------------------|

|   | B. | Level-Payment Shares |
|--------|----|----------------------|

|   | C. | Institutional Shares |
|--------|----|----------------------|

|   | D. | Financial Intermediary Shares |
|--------|----|-------------------------------|

|   | E. | Additional Classes |
|--------|----|--------------------|

| II. | Approval of Multiple Class Plan |
|-----|---------------------------------|

| III. | Dividends and Distributions |
|------|-----------------------------|

| IV. | Expense Allocations |
|-----|---------------------|

----

  
| 1/ | Class Expenses are limited to (i) transfer agency fees; (ii) preparation and mailing expenses for shareholder communications required by law, sent to current shareholders of a class; (iii) state Blue Sky registration fees; (iv) Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") registration fees; (v) trustees' fees; (vi) expenses incurred for periodic meetings of trustees or shareholders; and (vii) legal and accounting fees, other than fees for income tax return preparation or income tax advice. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350****)**     The undersigned executive officer of Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin, Inc. (the “Registrant”)hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.                                                        /s/ Michael W. Helser   Michael W. Helser, Treasurer and   Chief Financial Officer   November 7, 2005**Note:**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 has been provided to Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin, Inc. and will be retained by AnchorBanCorp Wisconsin, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER MARRERO, MERRA DIETZ, and BRADLEY DIETZ,

Appellants,

v.

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a GEICO,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2279

[February 3, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Jaimie R. Goodman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502006CA008234XXXMB.

Kenneth D. Cooper, Fort Lauderdale, and Scott A. Mager of Mager 

Paruas, LLC, Hollywood, for appellants.

B. Richard Young, Adam A. Duke, and Derek L. Veliz of Young, Bill, 

Boles, Palmer, Duke & Thompson, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus TIRADO-MATA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-10590.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Dec. 31, 2012.

Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S., United States District Court, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rubin Salter, Jr., Esquire, Law Office Of Rubin Salter, Jr, Big Spring, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Jesus Tirado-Mata, Tucson, AZ, pro se.

*511Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Tirado-Mata appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Tirado-Mata’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along -with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Tirado-Mata the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Donald P. Gill, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First Ipswich
Bancorp;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) As the small business issuer's certifying officer I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I
have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
      including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
      within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
      is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
      business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
      or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) As the small business issuer's certifying officer I have disclosed, based on
my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
      to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ Donald P. Gill
----------------------------------
Donald P. Gill
Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 218 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 218

 To express the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal 
 Communications Commission should not revise its media ownership rules 
        without more extensive review and comment by the public.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2003

Mr. Hinchey (for himself and Mr. Brown of Ohio) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To express the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal 
 Communications Commission should not revise its media ownership rules 
        without more extensive review and comment by the public.

Whereas Federal Communications Commission (hereinafter in this resolution 
        referred to as ``the FCC'') Chairman Michael Powell has announced that 
        on June 2, 2003, the FCC will vote to revise current media ownership 
        regulations as part of its Biennial Regulatory Review;
Whereas the changes to media ownership rules under consideration will affect 
        Newspaper-Broadcast Concentration, National TV Concentration, TV Duopoly 
        Protection, Multiple-Network Concentration, Radio-TV Concentration, and 
        Local Radio Concentration;
Whereas the FCC has held one official hearing on this matter in Richmond, 
        Virginia, on February 27, 2003;
Whereas FCC Chairman Powell has announced that the Commission will vote on a 
        final rule revising media ownership regulations without first allowing 
        for a public review and comment period on any proposed changes;
Whereas changes to these rules will impact every person's access to diverse 
        sources information; and
Whereas access to diverse sources of information is necessary to maintain the 
        informed citizenry needed for a functioning democracy: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the FCC should not weaken any current media ownership 
        rules that protect people's access to diverse sources of 
        information;
            (2) the FCC should examine, and better inform the general 
        public regarding, the consequences of weakening current media 
        ownership rules, in particular the increased level of media 
        consolidation and concentration that will likely occur; and
            (3) the FCC should allow for extensive public review and 
        comment on any proposed changes to current media ownership 
        rules before issuing a final rule.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned,  the Principal Financial Officer (CFO) of Viking Capital Group,
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

         (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the quarter
ended  September  30,  2004,  filed on the date hereof with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 15, 2004     /s/ William J. Fossen
                              ---------------------
                              William J. Fossen
                              Chief Financial Officer




                                                                              27
No. 1197.

#### Bailey *v.*Ragen, Warden.

May 20, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.