alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:

/s/ Robert CoppleRobert CoppleChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-632
In Re: NICHOLAS J. QUEEN, SR., Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-95-859) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nicholas J. Queen, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Nicholas Queen brought this mandamus petition seeking an order directing the district court to rule on a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. The district court denied Queen's motion by order dated October 14, 1997. Queen's request for mandamus relief is therefore moot. Accordingly, we grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis but dismiss the mandamus petition. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument wold not significantly aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Arizona Gold and Onyx Mining Company f/k/a Viking Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, Dick Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

May 8, 2018

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.2           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  of Viking
Capital Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Matthew W. Fossen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated:  June 10, 2003         /s/ Matthew W. Fossen
                              ---------------------
                              Matthew W. Fossen
                              Chief Financial Officer












                                                                              24
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 531 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 531

To permit health insurance issuers to offer additional plan options to 
                              individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 23, 2015

 Mr. Flake (for himself and Ms. Ayotte) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit health insurance issuers to offer additional plan options to 
                              individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Removing Limitations on Insurance 
Effectiveness and Flexibility Act of 2015'' or the ``ReLIEF Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO OFFER ADDITIONAL PLAN OPTIONS.

    (a) Catastrophic Plans.--Notwithstanding title I of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), a catastrophic 
plan as described in section 1302(e) of such Act shall be deemed to be 
a qualified health plan (including for purposes of receiving tax 
credits under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and 
cost-sharing assistance under section 1402 of this Act), except that 
for purposes of enrollment in such plans, the provisions of paragraph 
(2) of such section 1302(e) shall not apply.
    (b) Individual Mandate.--Coverage under a catastrophic plan under 
subsection (a) shall be deemed to be minimum essential coverage for 
purposes of section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
|  | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10‐K of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018; and |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ David M. Maura |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | David M. Maura     |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
HOLLYER BRADY SMITH TROXELL
           BARRETT ROCKETT HINES & MONE LLP
                   551 Fifth Avenue
                  New York, NY 10176

                  Tel: (212) 818-1110
                  FAX: (212) 818-0494
             e-mail: wldbst@ix.netcom.com

                                            November 14, 1996

Churchill Tax-Free Trust 
380 Madison Avenue, Suite 2300
New York, New York 10017


Ladies and Gentlemen:

     You have requested that we render an opinion to Churchill Tax-
Free Trust (the "Trust") with respect post-effective amendment No.
16 (the "Amendment") to the Registration Statement of the Trust
under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") which you propose
to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") to increase the number of its registered shares
pursuant to Section 24(e) of the Investment Company Act of 1940
(the "1940 Act") and the Rules of the Commission thereunder.  

     We have examined originals or copies, identified to our
satisfaction as being true copies, of those corporate records of the
Trust, certificates of public officials, and other documents and matters
as we have deemed necessary for the purpose of this opinion. We
have assumed without independent verification the authenticity of the
documents submitted to us as originals and the conformity to the
original documents of all documents submitted to us as copies.

     Upon the basis of the foregoing and in reliance upon such other
matters as we deem relevant under the circumstances, it is our
opinion that the number of shares of the Trust being registered by the
above amendment, when issued and paid for in accordance with the
terms set forth in the prospectus and statement of additional
information of the Trust forming a part of its then effective
Registration Statement as heretofore, herewith and hereafter
amended, will be duly issued, fully-paid and non-assessable to the
extent set forth therein.

     This letter is furnished to you pursuant to your request and to
the requirements imposed upon you under the 1933 Act and the
requirements imposed upon you by Section 24(e) under the Act and is
intended solely for your use for the purpose of completing the filing of
the Amendment with the Commission. This letter may not be used for
any other purpose or furnished to or relied upon by any other persons,
or included in any filing made with any other regulatory authority,
without our prior written consent. 

     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion with the
Amendment.

                            Very truly yours,
                           
                     HOLLYER BRADY SMITH TROXELL 
                     BARRETT ROCKETT HINES & MONE LLP  


                         /s/ W. L. D. Barrett
                   By:_________________________________
                         W. L. D. Barrett
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip A. Falcone, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Harbinger Group Inc.;
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: January 30, 2012                                             
|                                                                   
|/s/ PHILIP A. FALCONE                                              
|Philip A. Falcone
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
#### Antoine PEREZ, Plaintiff v. DEAN EQUIPMENT, INC., Defendant. Limit (No. 2) Limited, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Dean Equipment, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-30035.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 24, 2008.

Mat Marion Gray, III, Fowler Rodriguez & Chalos, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff/Plaintiff-Appellant.

Alan M. Cohen, Steeg & O’Connor, New Orleans, LA, Ronald A. Johnson, Johnson, Johnson, Barrios & Yacoubian, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant/Defendant-Appellee.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Limit (No. 2) Limited (Limit) a marine insurer, sued its insured Dean Equipment, *623Inc. (Dean) seeking a declaratory judgment declaring that plaintiff had no obligation to defend Dean on a suit brought by an employee of Dean.

The district court dismissed Limit’s suit on summary judgment concluding that Dean’s insurer, Limit, waived its coverage defense by unqualifiedly defending Dean for almost nine months after Limit had notice that its policy likely afforded no coverage.

We agree with the district court that the Louisiana Supreme Court decision of *Steptore v. Masco Construction Co., Inc.,*643 So.2d 1213 (La.1994), controls this case. In that case the Louisiana Supreme Court stated:

> Accordingly, when an insurer, with knowledge of facts indicating noncoverage under the insurance policy, assumes or continues the insured’s defense without obtaining a nonwaiver agreement to serve its coverage defense, the insurer waives such policy defense.

*Id.*at 1216.

The district court correctly granted summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5tii Cir. R. 47.5.4.
|                    |
|--------------------|
|                    |  |
| Date: June 9, 2016 |   |
|               | /s/ ROBERT A. KATZ |
|               | Robert A. Katz |
|               | Chief Executive Officer |

|                    |
|--------------------|
|                    |  |
| Date: June 9, 2016 |   |
|               | /s/ MICHAEL Z. BARKIN |
|               | Michael Z. Barkin |
|               | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

In the Interest of A. S. M., a Child,

 

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00212-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 200CM737)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until January 24, 2020. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. James D. Lucas, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before January 24, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rdday of December, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11.1

                      VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         (companies in the development stage)

                    STATEMENT OF CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                       (in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                        _____
                                           
                                                        Three Months Ended  
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      June 29,       June 30,
                                                        1997           1996
                                                      --------       --------
Actual weighted average shares of common stock 
  outstanding for the period                           21,805         21,669

Net loss for period                                   $(5,340)       $(3,194)

Net loss per share for period                          $(0.24)        $(0.15)


Dilutive common stock warrants and stock options have not been included in 
the calculations of common and common equivalent shares to calculate net loss 
per share, as their inclusion would be antidilutive.


                                      14
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6170
In Re: RESTONEY ROBINSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-03-523) Submitted: April 30, 2004 Decided: August 5, 2004 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Restoney Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Restoney Robinson petitions for writ of mandamus. He seeks an order vac ating his conviction and awarding him damages from his former defense attorney. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). The relief sought by Robinson is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT 32**

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the financial statements of Ophthalmic Imaging Systems (“Registrant”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended~~,~~; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date: November 13, 2008

 

|   | /s/ Gil Allon                                                                               |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Gil Allon                                                                                   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                        (Principal Executive Officer)                |
|   |                                                                                        |
|   |                                                                                        |
|   | /s/ Ariel Shenhar                                                                           |
|   | Ariel Shenhar                                                                               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
<PAGE> 1
                                                             Exhibit (23)-3



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
and Prospectuses on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-51749 and 33-64343) of Wisconsin
Electric Power Company of our report dated January 27, 1995 appearing on page
23 in Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northern States Power
Company (Wisconsin) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 (File No. 10-
3140).





/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP




Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 27, 1996
Nos. 1055 and 1230.

#### Beecher *v.*Federal Land Bank of Spokane et al.

June 10, 1946.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*C. D.*Randall.for respondents in No. 1055.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**STATSURE        DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC. FORMERLY SALIVA DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS,        INC.**

**March        31, 2005**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. for                the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and                Exchange                Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934; and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A                of                StatSure Diagnostic Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,                2005                fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and                results of operations of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----