alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OF THE
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the Annual Report of Subjex Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew D. Hyder,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 13, 2007                    By:  /s/  Andrew D. Hyder
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Chairman, President
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Arizona Gold and Onyx Mining Company f/k/a Viking Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, Dick Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

May 8, 2018

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1





OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jackson E. Reasor, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: November 14, 2002


/s/    JACKSON E. REASOR


---

Jackson E. Reasor


President and


Chief Executive Officer
### 750

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS
AUSTIN

~. -- -.-..-.-.. --.“.-I ..I.--- .---- _” _I_ .__^.I~. Iw”s..L - -,._ .“,“.“.Honorable Dan E. **Jaokaon,** page #z

“Third,

**whether, under**  4t1010 29ssb,the rttiitwo me Tax Aaaeaaor to rurnlah o list of the property

owners dll InvalIdate

the eleatIon.*

m ray t0 Y- rim t80 qtt88t.i0tt8 l;d dl faru attention

to Section3a of Artlola6 or, the-Constitution

of Texas,and Artlola ZQSSa of the ICtiaed CltllStatutes

& Tena (bywhloh MI& amndment to the ConatitutIon ma p&oad in our statutory law); **hapboll** vs. Wright, 95 8. 1. (W) 149 (A0writ of e rror l pplladto?); and TSXSS mia UtIlItIca

Corporation

~a. liolland,

1W S. W. (Zd)lo.088 (Wr1* of ~arror

dlan~W~ad

ror want af ~loriadlotion).

In the, oaaa of CampbqU ~8~ Wright the SanAntoaio Courtor Cl~llAppeals held tli+a.

propsrtr owner

ma qW$- rlad to tote ii his property wee ~*darad r0r tame by hip self or his aged or aaeaae~dior t+atIon by the Tu AaaasSb.

the law In thin Statsat this tlw ana hate so he14 os~ aqvaral oooaaiona. !~OW~VBP, we oall y o u r

l ttSntl On

to th8 faOt that there la now pending baron the f3uprama

Courta oartlflad queatIon

In the case of Gus AJ~YU~OWS~Y et al vs. 

### J. T. Hew man at al.,

rromthe Galvaaton

Court of CIvIl

Appeals

aa to the aorreot interpretation of these 8tatut6s. RU have read the brie? oi the appellenta'ln this 8188 and they present a verr strong and able argument etteaklna; the aottttUne88

ot CempbeU : rq. Wright end Texas Ppbllo UtilitiaS Corporation tea iioll.e~6, butrwafeel thatoatI the Stt~SBa Court eats on thIe StattOP, the op@.lonaof the court or ChIl Appeele, cited above, Ia the ler of this State and shouldb. Pollowed in @ring your itt8trribti0ne t0 the elaatlon

### 0rri0iala.

In reply to four third quaatlon, this departmentlb+8 several tImea ruled that Artlola CoSSb la unoonatltutIona;l, 

### r0r the mason that it lIttdta qtlaliri8u rotara to thou who

### 752

Honorable

Dan W. **Jaokaon,** paga #S

hare duly rendered

real proparty

**ior** kration, oontmy to tha express

lstt~~ In 

### Sootion Se ol Artlola6 of the ConetltutIon.

The Calve&on Court of ClrllAppeals has alao Intlmetad

that the'atattita

ma aaconatltutlonal in the case of Border 1s. Abla~'l3.l 5. V. &d) ll.86.

though not direotly

so holdlog.

- Tiiet oaaaala& h&ld thit tM-

&oh liet afreotcd e fali‘iiihit~oi the alectlon. We do not ballata,



### tmrer0r0, tli+It la naaoaaary%~-D~rc the list provldad

for In )hIa-.+tIsle.~ HowaVer, wc do feel thet3,he

Tar Colleo;, jtyl@a a oertlfled

II& R ahmld ?urnIahthe l laotlon the: ~rrranarho had duly randarad property ror taxation (rig dsi$n&d $88Tame PublicBmlce Corporation

vs. Holland)

atxthetthle&let might be used **by** the election/udgeato help%ham to~&tarmInethe qualliloatlon 

### 0r tha mtkrac TruatIngthatthIa an-sour qusiitIojN,,m ain
The Board
of Directors


World
Acceptance Corporation:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-52166, 33-98938, 333-14399, 333-107426, 333-135621, 333-153212) on Form S-8
and the registration statement (No. 333-139445) on Form S-3 of our reports dated
June 8, 2010 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of World Acceptance
Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended March 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2010, which reports appear in the annual
report on Form 10-K of World Acceptance Corporation for the year ended March 31,
2010.













Greenville,
South Carolina


June 8,
2010
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 280 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 280

 Congratulating Roger Clemens of the New York Yankees for pitching 300 
                           major league wins.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2003

 Mr. Sweeney submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating Roger Clemens of the New York Yankees for pitching 300 
                           major league wins.

Whereas Roger Clemens of the New York Yankees pitched a winning game Friday, 
        June 13, 2003, against the Saint Louis Cardinals at Yankee Stadium;
Whereas this win was the 300th of his career, making Roger Clemens only the 21st 
        player in major league history to reach this mark, making him only the 
        5th 300-game winner in the 103-year history of the American League;
Whereas Roger Clemens' achievement is one of the most impressive and difficult 
        to accomplish in baseball history, placing him in the very select 
        company of the greatest pitchers of all time;
Whereas from his first win against the Minnesota Twins in 1984 to today, Roger 
        Clemens has awed us with his ability and athletic prowess on the field 
        and his dignity and selflessness off the field;
Whereas Roger Clemens has showed us how powerful the combination of passion, 
        discipline and desire can be, by winning the coveted Cy Young award an 
        unprecedented 6 times;
Whereas throughout his record-breaking career Roger Clemens has embodied the 
        talent, exuberance, team spirit, and determination that Americans 
        associate with the very best qualities of sports and athletic 
        competition;
Whereas throughout the intense media scrutiny and public attention that has 
        accompanied his historic career, Roger Clemens has consistently 
        conducted himself with modesty and humility that has been an inspiration 
        to all Americans; and
Whereas Roger Clemens also accomplished another amazing feat Friday, June 13, 
        2003, striking out the 4,000th batter of his career--only Nolan Ryan and 
        Steve Carlton have more strikeouts than Roger Clemens, who had 10 on 
        that night: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates and 
commends Roger Clemens of the New York Yankees for his amazing 
accomplishment and for letting us dream as big as our hearts will 
allow, and thanks him for being a role model and an inspiration.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 12-14-00296-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DAVID MARK DAVIS II,

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW # 2

ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

David Mark Davis II attempts to appeal his conviction for speeding, for which he was 

assessed a fine of seventy-five dollars. Article 4.03 of the code of criminal procedure determines 

our jurisdiction in this matter. It provides as follows:

The Courts of Appeals shall have appellate jurisdiction coextensive with the limits of their 

respective districts in all criminal cases except those in which the death penalty has been assessed. 

This Article shall not be so construed as to embrace any case which has been appealed from any 

inferior court to the county court, the county criminal court, or county court at law, in which the 

fine imposed or affirmed by the county court, the county criminal court or county court at law 

does not exceed one hundred dollars, unless the sole issue is the constitutionality of the statute or 

ordinance on which the conviction is based.

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 4.03 (West Supp. 2014). Appellant appealed from a municipal 

court to a county court at law. The county court at law imposed a fine that does not exceed one 

hundred dollars. Appellant does not complain that the statute on which his conviction was based 

is unconstitutional. Therefore, we have no jurisdiction over this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

1

 

1 Neither party raised the jurisdictional issue in its brief. However, we are required to address a lack of 

jurisdiction sua sponte if the parties do not raise the issue. Solis v. State, 890 S.W.2d 518, 520 (Tex. App.—Dallas 

1994, no pet.).
2

JAMES T. WORTHEN

Chief Justice

Opinion delivered May 29, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 29, 2015

NO. 12-14-00296-CR

DAVID MARK DAVIS II,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2 

of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 14-1048)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the 

appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision 

be certified to the court below for observance.

James T. Worthen, Chief Justice.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

IH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN MIGUEL ALCARAZMARTINEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 05-76692

Agency No. A035-476-149

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Juan Miguel Alcaraz-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order and denying his application for a

FILED

DEC 07 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
IH/Research 2 05-76692

§ 212(c) waiver of inadmissability. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. §

1252. We review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration

proceedings, Sanchez-Cruz v. INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir. 2001), and we

dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. 

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of AlcarazMartinez’s application for a § 212(c) waiver of inadmissability. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(2)(B); Palma-Rojas v. INS, 244 F.3d 1191, 1192 (9th Cir. 2001) (per

curiam). 

Alcaraz-Martinez’s contention that the BIA violated his due process rights

by disregarding his evidence of hardship and misapplying the law to the facts of

his case is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable due

process claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005). 

Contrary to Alcaraz-Martinez’s contention, the BIA did not engage in

impermissible fact-finding in the course of deciding his appeal. Cf. Brezilien v.

Holder, 565 F.3d 1163, 1171 (9th Cir. 2009). The BIA was not required to defer to

the IJ’s determination that Alcaraz-Martinez warranted a grant of § 212(c) relief as

a matter of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(ii) (“The Board may review

questions of . . . discretion . . de novo.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
Exhibit 10.4






EXHIBIT 10.4 —  Schedule of Named Executive Officers Compensation




On December 16, 2008, the Compensation Committee of First Financial Corporation (the “Corporation”)
set the 2009 annual base salaries of the named executive officers and approved the bonus amounts
payable to the named executive officers for 2008. These amounts are set forth in the table below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Principal Position	 	2008 Bonus Award	 	 	2009 Base Salary	 
	Donald E. Smith
	 	$	160,000	 	 	$	602,775	 
	President and Chairman of the
Corporation; Chairman of First
Financial Bank, NA
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Norman L. Lowery
	 	$	150,000	 	 	$	485,509	 
	Vice Chairman, CEO and Vice
President of the Corporation;
President and CEO of First
Financial Bank, NA
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Michael A. Carty
	 	$	20,000	 	 	$	194,327	 
	CFO, Secretary and Treasurer of the
Corporation; Senior Vice President
and CFO of First Financial Bank, NA
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Richard O. White
	 	$	12,000	 	 	$	163,000	 
	Senior Vice President of First
Financial Bank, NA
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Thomas S. Clary
	 	$	15,000	 	 	$	161,976	 
	Senior Vice President and CCO of
First Financial Bank, NA
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), 
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Gale E. Klappa, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Wisconsin Electric Power Company;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:          March 6, 2006

/s/GALE E. KLAPPA                  Gale E. Klappa
                  Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                       3,285,000
<SECURITIES>                               432,174,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,517,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                131,727,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           606,467,000
<PP&E>                                     285,993,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             923,158,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      115,332,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,380,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 915,778,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               923,158,000
<SALES>                                  1,646,435,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,646,435,000
<CGS>                                    1,224,339,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,224,339,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            121,717,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                42,297,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         79,420,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                79,420,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.840
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.840
        

</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3376 

To ensure the integrity of laws enacted to prevent the use of financial 

instruments for funding or operating online casinos are not undermined 

by legal opinions not carrying the force of law issued by Federal Government lawyers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 

Mr. COTTON (for himself, Mr. LEE, and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To ensure the integrity of laws enacted to prevent the use 

of financial instruments for funding or operating online 

casinos are not undermined by legal opinions not carrying the force of law issued by Federal Government 

lawyers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAFFIRMATION OF PROHIBITION ON FUND4 ING OF UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING. 

5 The Memorandum Opinion for the Assistant Attor6 ney General of the Criminal Division of the Department 

7 of Justice, dated September 20, 2011, shall have no force 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3376 IS

1 or effect for the purposes of interpreting section 5362(10) 

2 of title 31, United States Code. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS