alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARTICLE III.  BOARD OF DIRECTORS

     3.02  Tenure and Qualifications.  The directors shall be divided into
           -------------------------
three classes1<F9> to consist of three members in each of three classes, and the
term of one class shall expire at each annual meeting.  At each annual meeting,
the number of directors equal to the number of the class whose term expires at
the time of such meeting shall be elected to hold office until the third
succeeding annual meeting.  Each director shall hold office for the term for
which he is elected and until his or her successor shall have been elected and,
if necessary, qualified, or until there is a decrease in the number of directors
which takes effect after the expiration of his or her term, or until his or her
prior death, resignation or removal.  A director may be removed by the
shareholders only at a meeting called for the purpose of removing the director,
and the meeting notice shall state that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of
the meeting is removal of the director.  A director may be removed from office
with or without cause if the number of votes cast to remove the director exceeds
the number of votes cast not to remove such director.  A director may resign at
any time by delivering written notice which complies with the Wisconsin Business
Corporation Law to the Board of Directors, to the President or to the
corporation.  A director's resignation is effective when the notice is delivered
unless the notice specifies a later effective date.  Directors need not be
residents of the State of Wisconsin or shareholders of the corporation.

1<F9>  3/14/00 Amended to read "consist of three members in each of two classes,
       and four members in the remaining class."
# Addressing China's Laws, Policies, Practices, and Actions Related to Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Technology

# Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby directed as follows:

**Section 1**                    .                     *Policy*. It is the policy of the United States for our trade relations to enhance our economic growth, contribute favorably to our balance of trade, promote reciprocal treatment of American goods and investment, and strengthen the American manufacturing base.                

The United States is a world leader in research-and-development-intensive, high-technology goods.  Violations of intellectual property rights and other unfair technology transfers potentially threaten United States firms by undermining their ability to compete fairly in the global market.  China has implemented laws, policies, and practices and has taken actions related to intellectual property, innovation, and technology that may encourage or require the transfer of American technology and intellectual property to enterprises in China or that may otherwise negatively affect American economic interests.  These laws, policies, practices, and actions may inhibit United States exports, deprive United States citizens of fair remuneration for their innovations, divert American jobs to workers in China, contribute to our trade deficit with China, and otherwise undermine American manufacturing, services, and innovation.

**Sec. 2**                    .                     *Determination of Whether to Conduct Investigation*. The United States Trade Representative shall determine, consistent with section 302(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2412(b)), whether to investigate any of China's laws, policies, practices, or actions that may be unreasonable or discriminatory and that may be harming American intellectual property rights, innovation, or technology development.                

**Sec. 3**                    .                     *General Provisions*. (a)  Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:                

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

                    (d)  You are hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2017-17528

Billing code 3290-F7-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
WISCONSIN BELL, INC.'S DECEMBER 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  273,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (26,700)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               274,300
<PP&E>                                       2,992,600
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,777,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,668,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          391,500
<BONDS>                                        290,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       639,200
<OTHER-SE>                                     (43,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,668,800
<SALES>                                              0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,272,200
<CGS>                                                0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  904,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (149,700)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                487,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                   200,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            287,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   287,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>WE HAVE NOT STATED SECURITIES SEPARATELY IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT MATERIAL. WE HAVE INCLUDED THEM IN THE "CASH" TAG.
<F2>NET SALES OF TANGIBLE PRODUCTS IS NOT MORE THAN 10% OF TOTAL OPERATING
REVENUES. WE THEREFORE HAVE NOT STATED THESE SALES SEPARATELY IN THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PER REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B).  WE HAVE INCLUDED 
THESE SALES IN THE "TOTAL REVENUES" TAG.
<F3>WE HAVE INCLUDED COST OF TANGIBLE GOODS SOLD IN COST OF SERVICE AND
PRODUCTS IN OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE "TOTAL COST" TAG, PER
REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B).
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6290
RAY ANTHONY DORSEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Balt imore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-94-2662-WMN) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Freeman Stanback, Jr., Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on August 31, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on February 2, 1996. Appellant's failure to notea timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,611
<INVENTORY>                                     22,843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,766
<PP&E>                                         123,835
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,456
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,418
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,459
<SALES>                                        193,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,206
<CGS>                                          111,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,848
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,716
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,132
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,132
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                            EXHIBIT 23

                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated May 16, 1997 accompanying the consolidated 
financial statements incorporated by reference or included in the Annual 
Report of York Research Corporation and Subsidiaries (which expressed an 
unqualified opinion and included an emphasis paragraph relating to the 
Company's assets related to the Warbasse Project), on Form 10-K for the year 
ended February 28, 1997. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference 
of said report in the Registration Statements of York Research on Forms S-3 
(File No. 33-36056, effective August 16, 1990; File No. 33-73616, effective 
November 2, 1994; File No. 33-89418, effective February 22, 1995; File No. 
33-90654, effective April 6, 1995; File No. 333-10035, effective August 29, 
1996; and File No; 333-14151, effective October 24, 1996) and on Forms S-8 
(File No. 33-63730, effective June 3, 1993; File No. 33-67616, effective 
August 20, 1993; File No. 33-75850, effective March 2, 1994; File No. 
33-74730, effective July 2, 1994; and File No. 333-11781, effective September 
11, 1996).




GRANT THORNTON LLP



New York, New York
May 16, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     financial statements for the nione months ended February 28, 1997 and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              May-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jun-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Feb-28-1997

<CASH>                                             1042843
<RECEIVABLES>                                     62773821
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                      0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                    0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                               47308703
<PP&E>                                            19176505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   152128587
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<PAYABLES>                                        34375442
<REPOS-SOLD>                                             0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                      0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                17847934
<LONG-TERM>                                        3000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            143432
<OTHER-SE>                                        90237850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     152128587
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                 92368915
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                               5899232
<COMMISSIONS>                                     25024168
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                            0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                      1848266
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  273872
<COMPENSATION>                                    43677551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   11883496
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         6055974
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       6055974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.47
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kennedy-Wilson, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, William J. McMorrow, Chief Executive Officer and Freeman A. Lyle, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                           
|------ |  | --------------------------
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    WILLIAM J. MCMORROW
|       |  |                           
|Name:  |  | William J. McMorrow       
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer   
|Date:  |  | May 14, 2004              
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    FREEMAN LYLE       
|       |  |                           
|Name:  |  | Freeman A. Lyle           
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer   
|Date:  |  | May 14, 2004
amendment to 401 K and ESOP plan dated Dec. 16,2008



 Exhibit 10.19 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 SUN HYDRAULICS CORPORATION 401(K) AND ESOP RETIREMENT PLAN 
 (Non-spousal Rollovers) 
 The Sun Hydraulics
Corporation 401(k) and ESOP Retirement Plan (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan”) provides in Section 8.1 for subsequent plan amendments. Sun Hydraulics Corporation (“Company”) now wishes to amend the Plan in the manner
described below to permit non-spouse beneficiaries to elect to transfer death benefits payable from the Plan to Individual Retirement Accounts. The Plan is therefore, amended as follows: 
 1. Section 7.13 of the Plan, entitled “Direct Rollover,” is revised effective as of January 1, 2009 by the addition of the
following paragraph at the end of Subsection 7.13(b)(3): 
 “(3) Effective for distributions payable after December 31, 2008 as a
result of an Employee’s death, the term distributee shall also include an individual who is the deceased Employee’s designated beneficiary but is not the surviving spouse of the deceased Employee, and a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer
to an Individual Retirement Account established on behalf of such non-spousal beneficiary shall be treated as an eligible rollover distribution for purposes of this Section 7.13 and Code Section 402(c), to the extent permitted by Treasury
Regulations or other guidance published under section 402(c) of the Code.” 
 2. In all other respects, the terms of the Plan, as
amended to date, are hereby ratified and confirmed. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Sun Hydraulics Corporation has caused this Second Amendment
to the Plan to be executed by its duly authorized representative this 16th day of December, 2008. 
  

							
		 		 	SUN HYDRAULICS CORPORATION
				
	Witness:	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Tricia Fulton

	  
	 		 	Title:	 	 CFO
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Damien Jenkins, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 629]

The County Court did not err in allowing the People to elicit testimony from police officers that a warrant existed for the defendant’s arrest for a serious felony and that the officers had reason to believe he might be in possession of a weapon. This limited testimony, which did not describe the nature of the uncharged felony, and was coupled with proper limiting instructions, was necessary to provide background information establishing the basis for the officers’ actions, and was more probative than prejudicial *(see People v Tosca,*98 NY2d 660*781[2002]; *People v Monzon,*289 AD2d 595 [2001]; *People v Callegari,*236 AD2d 551 [1997]; *cf. People v Resek,*3 NY3d 385 [2004]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), it was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant caused physical injury to a police officer with the intent to prevent him from performing a lawful duty *(see*Penal Law § 120.05 [3]; *People v Coulanges,*264 AD2d 853 [1999]; *People v McKenzie,*173 AD2d 493 [1991]), and that the defendant caused serious physical injury to a bystander in the course of and in furtherance of the commission of a felony or immediate flight therefrom *(see*Penal Law § 120.10 [4]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Carni, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135205 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135205 COA: 279664 Oakland CC: 06-210710-FH JACKIE RICHARD MAYBEE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 27, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PHILLIP LEE GOSS,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-3124

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DC1221140141-W-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Phillip Lee Goss moves for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis. 

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. 

 

Case: 14-3124 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 07/01/2014
2 GOSS v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s24

Case: 14-3124 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 07/01/2014
No. 115, Misc.

No. 116, Misc.

#### United States ex rel. Foxall *v.*Ragen, Warden; and Dobry *v.*Olson, Warden.

April 29, 1946.

The motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.