alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Exhibit 12

                               North Shore Gas Company and Subsidiary Companies

                    Statement Re:  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                           (Dollars in Thousands)




                                                    Fiscal years ended September 30,
                                           1998        1997        1996        1995        1994
 
<S>                                     <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>     
Net Income Before Preferred
  Stock Dividends                       $  12,986   $ 14,814    $ 16,347    $  9,048    $ 10,378

Add - Income Taxes                          8,124      9,229      10,154       4,859       5,087
      Fixed Charges (see below)             5,190      5,068       5,741       7,196       6,648

Earnings                                $  26,300   $ 29,111    $ 32,242    $ 21,103    $ 22,113

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on Long-Term Debt            $   4,625   $  4,627    $  4,937    $  5,905    $  6,326
  Other Interest                              565        441         804       1,291         322

     Total Fixed Charges                $   5,190   $  5,068    $  5,741    $  7,196    $  6,648

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges           5.07       5.74        5.62        2.93        3.33

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
  (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf Resources, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief:
  (1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.


Dated: August 16, 2010By:
/s/ Xiaobin LiuXiaobin LiuChief Executive Officer




Dated: August 16, 2010By:
/s/ Min LiMin LiChief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FERNANDO ZAVALA-JACOBO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-50523

D.C. No. 3:11-cr-04273-IEG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 10, 2014** 

Before: PREGERSON, LEAVY, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Fernando Zavala-Jacobo appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the six-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

MAR 13 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Zavala-Jacobo contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing

to explain adequately why it imposed the sentence it did, why it declined to grant a

greater downward variance, and why it was not persuaded by his sentencing

arguments. We review for plain error, see United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173,

1176 (9th Cir. 2006), and find none. The district court explained the sentence

sufficiently to permit meaningful appellate review. See United States v. Carty, 520

F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

Zavala-Jacobo also contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable

because it is punitive, is greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of

sentencing, and does not account for mitigating factors. We review for abuse of

discretion, see Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007), and find none. The

sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing

factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Zavala-Jacobo’s criminal

history and breach of trust. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f); Miqbel, 444 F.3d at 1181-82.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-50523
Sommer  &  Barnard
Attorneys  at  Law-  PC


                              January  27,  1999

Saturna  Investment  Trust
C/O  Saturna  Capital
1300  North  State  Street
Bellingham,  Washington  98225-4730

     Re:        Amendment  to  Form  N-1A

Gentlemen:
     In  accordance  with the  registration  of an  indefinite  number  of units
("Units") registered by Saturna Investment Trust (the "Trust") for its Funds, we
have been asked to provide  the  opinion of counsel  required  to be filed as an
exhibit to the Trust's  registration  statement on Form N-1A (the  "Registration
Statement").  In  rendering  this  opinion,  we  have  examined  such  documents
(including  the audited  financial  statements  of the Funds as of November  30,
1998), records and questions of law as we deemed it necessary to examine for the
purpose of this opinion. Based on that examination and investigation,  it is our
opinion that the Units will be, upon issuance,  validly  issued,  fully paid and
not liable to further assessment.

     We  consent  to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to Post Effective
Amendment  No.  17  to  the  Registration  Statement.

Very  truly  yours,

SOMMER  &  BARNARD,  PC
/s/Sommer  &  Barnard,  PC
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             114
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   114
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          238,315
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,600
<OTHER-SE>                                    (58,801)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       114
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,036)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,036)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,036)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0







</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

135690 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 135690 COA: 268462 Macomb CC: 2005-001709-FC 2005-001648-FC; 2005-001929-FC; 2005-003550-FC; 2005-003551-FC; 2005-003552-FC; 2005-001704-FC; 2005-001710-FC; and 2005-001700-FC TRENT ANTHONY BELLAMY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 29, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40998 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
JOSE JAVIER BANEGAS

- GOMEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:18

- CR

- 608

- 1

Before KING, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Javier Banegas

- Gomez appeals his conviction for illegal reentry after removal on the ground that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary. Banegas

- Gomez complains that he was unaware when he pleaded guilty that his petition for review of his underlying removal order was still pendin g in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and that his removal violat ed that circuit’s policy against executing a removal order while a motion for a stay

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 25, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40998 Document: 00515212209 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/25/2019No. 18

- 40998

2 of removal is pending

. See Efstathiadis v. Holder , 752 F.3d 591, 599 n.5 (2d Cir. 2014)

. As Banegas

- Gomez concedes, this issue was not raised in the district court and is thus reviewed only for plain error . See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009)

. In considering whether an error is clear or obvious,

we must decide whether control ling precedent has reached the issue in question or whether the legal question would be subject to reasonable dispute. United States v. Fields , 777 F.3d 799, 802 (5th Cir. 2015). Banegas

- Gomez has not identif ied any controlling Fifth Circuit or Supreme Court precedent on the issue whether a defendant pleading guilty to illegal reentry must know that his removal violated the Second Circuit’s forbearance policy , n or has Banegas

- Gomez show n that it is beyond reasonable dispute that such knowledge is require d

. See id

. Accordingly , Banegas

- Gomez has failed to demonstrate that the district court clearly or obviously erred in accepting his guilty plea to illegal reentry despite his lack of knowledge that his underlying removal had been executed in violation of the Second Circuit’s forbearance policy

. See Puckett , 556 U.S. at 135.
T he judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. Case: 18-40998 Document: 00515212209 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/25/2019
EXHIBIT 4.2 (d)

EXECUTION COPY

VAIL RESORTS, INC.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement No. 333-139630 on Form S-8 of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. of our reports dated August 25, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as ofJune 25, 2008 and June 27, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended June 25, 2008 (Successor Company), the 32 weeks ended June 27, 2007(Successor Company), the 20 weeks ended November 15, 2006 (Predecessor Company), and the year ended June 28, 2006 (Predecessor Company), and the related financial statement schedule II, and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of June 25, 2008, which reports appear in the June 25, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. 

Ourreport on the consolidated financial statements dated August 25, 2008 contains explanatory paragraphs that state: 1) The Company filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on February 21,2005. The Company’s plan of reorganization became effective and the Company emerged from bankruptcy protection on November 21, 2006. In connection with its emergence from bankruptcy, the Successor Company Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. adoptedfresh-start reporting in conformity with AICPA Statement of Position 90-7, “*Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code*” effective as of November 15, 2006; 2) In connection with the adoption offresh-start reporting, the Company early adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties”; 3) In connection with the adoption of fresh-start reporting,the Company early adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “*Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other PostretirementPlans*”; 4) The Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 47, “*Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations*” as of June 28, 2006; and 5) the Companyadopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “*Share-Based Payment*,” and changed its method for accounting for share-based payments as ofJune 30, 2005. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Jacksonville, Florida

Certified Public Accountants 

August 25, 2008
No. 1277.

#### James *v.*Ragen, Warden.

June 10, 1946.

Petition for writ pf certiorari to the Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois, denied.
EXHIBIT 23








                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports included in this Form 10-K into WPS Resources Corporation's
previously filed Registration Statement Files No. 33-47172, No. 33-61991,
No. 33-65167, No. 333-63101, No. 333-88525, and No. 333-93193, and Wisconsin
Public Service Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement Files
No. 33-35050 and No. 333-67979.




                                            /S/ Arthur Andersen LLP


                                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 16, 2000

                                     E-241

<PAGE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**











**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of Wilshire Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Seth H.
      Ugelow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C Section 78(a) or 78o(d); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations
      of
      the Company.





Dated:
      March 31, 2006





By: /s/
      Seth H. Ugelow


Seth
      H. Ugelow


Chief
      Financial Officer
No. 1228.

#### Bishop *v.*Bankers Building, Inc.

June 3, 1946.

*Howard F. Bishop, pro se.*

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
#### HALLWOOD CASH REGISTER CO. v. NATIONAL CASH REGISTER CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 6, 1903.)

No. 1,192.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.

Edward Rector, for appellee.

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cynosure, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael R. Davin, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 6, 2011

/s/    Michael R.
DavinMichael R. DavinChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 7, 2009 | Signed:  /s/  Donald M. Boone     
|------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                    | Donald M. Boone,
President and CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         48,272
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         13,782
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               27,525
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    392,526
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         89,815
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           86,485
<LOANS>                                        966,111
<ALLOWANCE>                                    13,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,607,107
<DEPOSITS>                                     1,260,312
<SHORT-TERM>                                   188,809
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            16,488
<LONG-TERM>                                    19,951
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       76,737
<OTHER-SE>                                     44,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1,607,107
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                21,927
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              7,595
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               356
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               29,878
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             11,976
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15,616
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          14,262
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  1,072
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             39
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                9,292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,889
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     6,889
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,577
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.08
<LOANS-NON>                                    3,153
<LOANS-PAST>                                   2,686
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               13,800
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  933
<RECOVERIES>                                   52
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              13,991
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           13,991
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>