alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): March 13, 2018





Vail Resorts, Inc.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)





Delaware001-0961451-0291762(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)390 Interlocken CrescentBroomfield, Colorado80021(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(303) 404-1800





Not Applicable(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


[  ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[  ] Soliciting materials pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[  ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[  ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company  ̈


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ̈























---







Item 7.01  Regulation FD Disclosure.





On March 13, 2018, members of the management team of Vail Resorts, Inc. (the “Company”) will be participating in meetings with investors in connection with its 2018 investors’ conference.  The Company posted the investor presentation in the “Investor Relations” section of its website available at http://investors.vailresorts.com .




















---







SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





VAIL RESORTS, INC.Date: March 13, 2018By:/s/ Michael Z. BarkinName:  Michael Z. BarkinTitle:  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 1, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40829

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER W. LAWRENCE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-02-CR-307-1

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Christopher W. Lawrence has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lawrence has filed a

response to the motion. Our review of the brief filed by

counsel, Lawrence’s response, and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 
No. 03-40829

-2-

A number of ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims have

been raised in the brief and in the response. Lawrence may raise

those claims in a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United

States v. Brewster, 137 F.3d 853, 859 (5th Cir. 1998). 

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION GRANTED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 365 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 365

 To improve rangeland conditions and restore grazing levels within the 
           Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 2015

  Mr. Hatch (for himself and Mr. Lee) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To improve rangeland conditions and restore grazing levels within the 
           Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENT OF RANGELAND CONDITIONS AND RESTORATION OF 
              GRAZING LEVELS, GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL 
              MONUMENT.

    (a) In General.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall implement a management 
program within areas of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument 
that are administered by the Bureau of Land Management--
            (1) to improve rangeland conditions for wildlife and 
        livestock carrying capacity in those areas; and
            (2) to restore livestock grazing to the level of usage in 
        those areas that existed as of September 17, 1996.
    (b) Permits.--In issuing or renewing grazing permits and in issuing 
or modifying allotment management plans for livestock grazing in the 
areas described in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall 
incorporate reasonable standards and guidelines that are consistent 
with--
            (1) the ``Utah Standards for Rangeland Health and 
        Guidelines for Grazing Management for BLM Lands in Utah'', 
        approved by the Secretary of the Interior on May 20, 1997; and
            (2) the applicable regulations of the Bureau of Land 
        Management contained in subpart 4100 of title 43, Code of 
        Federal Regulations (relating to livestock grazing on public 
        land) (or successor regulations).
                                 <all>
```
IV 

House Calendar No. 65

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 281

[Report No. 108–157] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to make the repeal of the 

estate tax permanent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2003

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to make 

the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 8) to make the repeal of the estate tax permanent. The 

4 bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The pre5 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 

6 and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 

7 intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the 

8 bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
2

HRES 281 RH 

1 ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 

2 Means; (2) the amendment printed in the report of the 

3 Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if of4 fered by Representative Pomeroy of North Dakota or his 

5 designee, which shall be in order without intervention of 

6 any point of order, shall be considered as read, and shall 

7 be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and 

8 controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one 

9 motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

House Calendar No. 65

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 281

[Report No. 108–157] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to 

make the repeal of the estate tax permanent. 

JUNE 17, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 30889 C onfer enc e C al endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. M E L V IN L U T C H E R , a ls o k n o w n a s M e l, a ls o k n o w n a s B igM e l, D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he E as t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U S D C N o . 2 :03 -C R -3 3 8 -2
B ef ore G A R Z A , D E N N IS, an d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * M elvi n L u t cher, federalpri soner # 2 109 2- 034 , app eal s f rom t h e di st ri ct court’ s den i al of h i s 18 U
. S
. C
. § 358 2( c) ( 2) m ot i on f or a redu ct i on i n hi s s en t en ce. H e c o nt e nds t hatt he de ni alo f hi s m o t i o n w as an abus e of di s c r e t i o n b e c aus e t he di s t r i c tc o ur tfai l e d t o t ak e i nt o c o ns i de r at i o n t he c r ac k/po w de rdi s pa ri t y and gav e t oo m u ch w ei gh tt o hi s pri son d i sci pl i n ary of fen ses. W e revi ew the deci si on w h et h er t o gran tor den y a § 358 2( c) ( 2) m ot i on f or a n a b u s e o f d is c r e tio n . Un i t ed S t ate s v. E van s, 5 8 7 F .3d 6 6 7 , 6 7 2 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 9 ). United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 12, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 08-30889 Document: 00511027179 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010N o. 08- 30889

2 A d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s r e q u i r e d t o c o n s i d e rt h e s e n t e n c i n gfa c t o r s s e to u ta t1 8 U. S
. C. § 3 553( a) w hen c ont em pl at i ng a § 3582(c ) ( 2) m ot i on, buti tnee d notex pl ai n t hat i t h a s d on e s o . Id. at673- 74. A di st r i c tc our tnee d notpr ovi de any r eas ons at a ll fo r d e n y in g a § 3 5 8 2 (c )(2 ) m o tio n . I d. a t674
. W e can assu m e t h at a di st ri ct court h as con si dered an y § 3 553 ( a) argu m en t s presented i n favor of a sentence r e d u c tio n . Id
. at673. T h e d is tr ic t c o u r t im p lic itlyco n s id e r e d L u tc h e r ’ s r e h a b ilita tiv e e ffo r ts in p r is o n , s e eid ., a n d e xp l i ci tl y con sider ed L u tch er’ s l a ck o f reh a b i l i tative eff orts gener al l y. Lutc her , m or eo ver , has a hi st or y as a habi t ualc r i m i nal
. Th e de ni al o f L u tc h e r ’ s § 3 5 8 2 (c )(2 ) m o tio n w a s n o t a n a b u s e o f d is c r e tio n . S ee i d. at672. AF F I RMED. Case: 08-30889 Document: 00511027179 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3436 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3436

To prevent proposed regulations relating to restrictions on liquidation 
 of an interest with respect to estate, gift, and generation-skipping 
                   transfer taxes from taking effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2016

   Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Flake, and Mr. Moran) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prevent proposed regulations relating to restrictions on liquidation 
 of an interest with respect to estate, gift, and generation-skipping 
                   transfer taxes from taking effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Family Farms and Businesses 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROPOSED REGULATIONS RELATING TO RESTRICTIONS ON LIQUIDATION OF 
              AN INTEREST WITH RESPECT TO ESTATE, GIFT, AND GENERATION-
              SKIPPING TRANSFER TAXES PREVENTED FROM TAKING EFFECT.

    The proposed regulations under section 2704 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 relating to restrictions on liquidation of an interest 
with respect to estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer taxes, 
published on August 4, 2016, in the Federal Register (81 Fed. Reg. 
51413) shall have no force or effect. No Federal funds may be used to 
finalize, implement, administer, or enforce such proposed regulations 
or any substantially similar regulations.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

HIF BIO, INC. 

AND BIZBIOTECH CO., LTD., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v. 

YUNG SHIN PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD. 

(DOING BUSINESS AS YUNG SHIN 

PHARMACEUTICALS AND YUNG SHIN PHARM. 

IND. CO. LTD.), 

YUNG ZIP CHEMICAL CO., LTD., FANG-YU LEE, 

AND CHE-MING TENG, 

Defendants, 

and 

CARLSBAD TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

FISH AND RICHARDSON P.C., 

AND Y. ROCKY TSAO, 

Defendants. 

__________________________ 

2006-1522 

__________________________ 
HIF BIO v. YUNG SHIN PHARMA 2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in case no. 05-CV-07976, 

Judge Dean D. Pregerson. 

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING 

__________________________ 

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge,* GAJARSA, Circuit Judge, 

and HOLDERMAN, Chief District Judge.**

ORDER 

Defendant-Appellant Carlsbad Technology, Inc. filed a 

combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en 

banc. The petition for panel rehearing was considered by 

the panel that heard the appeal. The panel grants the 

petition for panel rehearing for the limited purpose of 

amending page 16, lines 12-18 of the issued opinion. 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The petition for panel rehearing is granted for 

the limited purpose of amending the following language 

on page 16, lines 12-18 of the issued opinion: 

Because the second and fourth causes of action arise 

under § 1338(a), the district court abused its discretion in 

remanding those causes of action the First Amended 

Complaint to state court. See Hunter Douglas, Inc., 153 

F.3d at 1328; Baker, 387 F.3d at 656-57. However, on 

remand the district court should dismiss both the second 

and fourth causes of action under Rule 12(b)(6) because 

 * Paul R. Michel retired from the position of 

Chief Judge on May 31, 2010. ** The Honorable James F. Holderman, Chief 

Judge, United States District Court for the Northern 

District of Illinois, sitting by designation. 
3 HIF BIO v. YUNG SHIN PHARMA

plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which relief 

can be granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c), the 

district court has discretion to decide on remand 

whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over 

the remaining causes of action. Additionally, because 

the remaining state law claims do not arise under federal 

law, the district should remand them to California state 

court.

(2) The petition for panel rehearing is 

otherwise denied. 

FOR THE COURT

June 14, 2010 

—————————— 

Date 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

—————————— 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

cc: Bub-Joo S. Lee, Esq. 

Glenn W. Rhodes, Esq.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I,    Gareb Shamus, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Fight League, Inc.;     2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:   November 19, 2007         /s/ Gareb Shamus
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 7, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135001 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135001 COA: 279562 Kalamazoo CC: 06-002473-FH RANDOLPH CARTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 29, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY
, J., would grant leave to appeal.

s0430 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 7, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit 32(a)



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and accompanies the annual report
on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended January 2, 2005 of Wendys International, Inc. (the Issuer).



I, John T. Schuessler, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



(i) the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and



(ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



Dated: April 1, 2005



/s/ JOHN T. SCHUESSLERName: John T. Schuessler




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wendys International, Inc. and will be retained by Wendys International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of Wilshire Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Francis
      J.
      Elenio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C Section 78(a) or 78o(d);
      and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations
      of
      the Company.





Dated:
      April 14, 2008




By:
            /s/
                Francis J. ElenioFrancis
                J. ElenioChief
                Financial Officer