Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules 39549 

(h) Revision of Maintenance or Inspection 

Program 

Within 24 months after the effective date 

of this AD, and after accomplishing the 

actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD 

on all airplanes in an operator’s fleet, as 

applicable, revise the maintenance or 

inspection program, as applicable, to add 

Airworthiness Limitation (AWL) 28–AWL– 

MOVA by incorporating the information 

specified in figure 1 to paragraph (h) of this 

AD into the Airworthiness Limitations 

Section of the Instructions for Continued 

Airworthiness. 

FIGURE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (h) OF THIS AD—AWL FOR ENGINE FUEL SHUTOFF VALVE (FUEL SPAR VALVE) ACTUATOR

INSTALLATION PROHIBITION

AWL No. Applicability Description 

28–AWL–MOVA .............................. (1) Airplanes with AIMS–1 system, 

or (2) Airplanes with AIMS–2 

BlockPoint (BP) v 16 and earlier 

software.

Motor Operator Valve (MOV) Actuator—Prohibition of Installation of 

Specific Part Numbers. 

Installation of MOV actuator part number (P/N) MA30A1001 (Boeing 

P/N S343T003–66) and P/N MA20A2027 (Boeing P/N S343T003– 

56) is prohibited at the following positions: 

1. Left engine fuel shutoff spar valve position. 

2. Right engine fuel shutoff spar valve position. 

(i) Terminating Action for AD 2015–19–01 

Accomplishment of the actions required by 

paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD terminates 

all requirements of AD 2015–19–01. 

(j) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for actions 

specified in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this AD, if 

AIMS–2 Blockpoint Version 17 or 17.1 was 

installed before the effective date of this AD 

either in production or using Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 777–31–0227, 

dated November 7, 2014; or Revision 1, dated 

August 12, 2015. 

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 

14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your 

principal inspector or local Flight Standards 

District Office, as appropriate. If sending 

information directly to the manager of the 

certification office, send it to the attention of 

the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of 

this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9- 

ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair, 

modification, or alteration required by this 

AD if it is approved by the Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO 

Branch, to make those findings. To be 

approved, the repair method, modification 

deviation, or alteration deviation must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) For service information that contains 

steps that are labeled as Required for 

Compliance (RC), the provisions of 

paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and (k)(4)(ii) of this AD 

apply. 

(i) The steps labeled as RC, including 

substeps under an RC step and any figures 

identified in an RC step, must be done to 

comply with the AD. An AMOC is required 

for any deviations to RC steps, including 

substeps and identified figures. 

(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be 

deviated from using accepted methods in 

accordance with the operator’s maintenance 

or inspection program without obtaining 

approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps, 

including substeps and identified figures, can 

still be done as specified, and the airplane 

can be put back in an airworthy condition 

(l) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact David Lee, Aerospace Engineer, 

Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO 

Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6497; fax: 425– 

917–6590; email: david.a.lee@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data 

Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., 

MC 110 SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600; 

telephone 562 797 1717; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this 

referenced service information at the FAA, 

Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information 

on the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 28, 

2017. 

John P. Piccola, Jr., 

Acting Director, System Oversight Division, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2017–16570 Filed 8–18–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2016–9545; Airspace 

Docket No. 16–AGL–33] 

Proposed Establishment of Class E 

Airspace; Rosebud, SD 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

establish Class E airspace at Rosebud, 

SD. Controlled airspace is necessary to 

accommodate new special instrument 

approach procedures developed at 

Rosebud Sioux Tribal Airport, for the 

safety and management of instrument 

flight rules (IFR) operations at the 

airport. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 5, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 

366–9826, or (800) 647–5527. You must 

identify FAA Docket No. FAA–2016- 

9545; Airspace Docket No. 16–AGL–33, 

at the beginning of your comments. You 

may also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office between 

9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except federal holidays. 

FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, and 

subsequent amendments can be viewed 

online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/ 

publications/. For further information, 

you can contact the Airspace Policy 

Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is 

also available for inspection at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of FAA 

Order 7400.11A at NARA, call (202) 

741–6030, or go to http://

www.archives.gov/federal_register/


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
39550 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules 

code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_

locations.html. 

FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca Shelby, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support 

Group, Central Service Center, 10101 

Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 

76177; telephone (817) 222–5857. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it would 

establish Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

at Rosebud Sioux Tribal Airport, 

Rosebud, SD, to support special 

instrument approach procedures for IFR 

operations at the airport. 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers and be submitted in 

triplicate to the address listed above. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this notice must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2016- 9545/Airspace 

Docket No. 16–AGL–33.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s Web page at http://

www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see the 

ADDRESSES section for the address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined during 

normal business hours at the Federal 

Aviation Administration, Air Traffic 

Organization, Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, 10101 

Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 

76177. 

All communications received before 

the specified closing date for comments 

will be considered before taking action 

on the proposed rule. The proposal 

contained in this notice may be changed 

in light of the comments received. A 

report summarizing each substantive 

public contact with FAA personnel 

concerned with this rulemaking will be 

filed in the docket. 

Availability and Summary of 

Documents for Incorporation by 

Reference 

This document proposes to amend 

FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 3, 2016, and effective 

September 15, 2016. FAA Order 

7400.11A is publicly available as listed 

in the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. FAA Order 7400.11A lists 

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, 

air traffic service routes, and reporting 

points. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) part 71 by establishing Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of Rosebud Sioux Tribal Airport, 

Rosebud, SD, to accommodate new 

special instrument approach 

procedures. Controlled airspace is 

needed for the safety and management 

of IFR operations at the airport. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.11A, dated August 3, 2016, 

and effective September 15, 2016, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current, is noncontroversial and unlikely to result in 

adverse or negative comments. It, 

therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a regulatory evaluation as 

the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this 

proposed rule, when promulgated, 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the criteria of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Federal 

Aviation Administration proposes to 

amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11A, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 3, 2016, and 

effective September 15, 2016, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules 39551 

AGL SD E5 Rosebud, SD [New] 

Rosebud Sioux Tribal Airport, SD 

(Lat. 43°15′31′′ N., long. 100°51′34′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of Rosebud Sioux Tribal Airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on August 14, 

2017. 

Christopher L. Southerland, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

ATO Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17509 Filed 8–18–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2017–0387; FRL–9966–33– 

Region 4] 

Air Plan Approval; SC: Miscellaneous 

Revisions to Multiple Rules 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

changes to the South Carolina State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) to revise 

several miscellaneous rules, covering 

definitions, source tests, credible 

evidence, open burning, air pollution 

episodes, and fugitive particulate 

matter. EPA is proposing to approve 

portions of SIP revisions submitted by 

the State of South Carolina, through the 

South Carolina Department of Health 

and Environmental Control on the 

following dates: July 18, 2011, June 17, 

2013, April 10, 2014, August 8, 2014, 

January 20, 2016, and July 27, 2016. 

These actions are being proposed 

pursuant to the Clean Air Act. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before September 20, 

2017. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2017–0387 at http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

EPA may publish any comment received 

to its public docket. Do not submit 

electronically any information you 

consider to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, 

etc.) must be accompanied by a written 

comment. The written comment is 

considered the official comment and 

should include discussion of all points 

you wish to make. EPA will generally 

not consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. 

Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management 

Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Akers 

can be reached via telephone at (404) 

562–9089 or via electronic mail at 

akers.brad@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Final Rules Section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

implementation plan revision as a direct 

final rule without prior proposal 

because the Agency views this as a 

noncontroversial submittal and 

anticipates no adverse comments. A 

detailed rationale for the approval is set 

forth in the direct final rule. If no 

adverse comments are received in 

response to this rule, no further activity 

is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be 

withdrawn and all public comments 

received will be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period on this 

document. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this document should 

do so at this time. 

Dated: August 4, 2017. 

V. Anne Heard, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17236 Filed 8–18–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

49 CFR Parts 523, 531, 533, 536 and 

537 

[NHTSA–2016–0068] 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 86 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0827; FRL–9966–62– 

OAR] 

Request for Comment on 

Reconsideration of the Final 

Determination of the Mid-Term 

Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas 

Emissions Standards for Model Year 

2022–2025 Light-Duty Vehicles; 

Request for Comment on Model Year 

2021 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Standards 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), 

Department of Transportation (DOT), 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA). 

ACTION: Request for comment. 

SUMMARY: In a March 22, 2017, Federal 

Register document, the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) announced its 

intention to reconsider the Final 

Determination of the Mid-term 

Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions 

standards for model year 2022–2025 

light-duty vehicles and to coordinate its 

reconsideration with the parallel 

rulemaking process to be undertaken by 

the Department of Transportation’s 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration (NHTSA) regarding 

Corporate Average Fuel Economy 

(CAFE) standards for cars and light 

trucks for the same model years. In this 

document, EPA is announcing that it is 

reconsidering whether the light-duty 

vehicle greenhouse gas standards 

previously established for model years 

2022–2025 are appropriate under 

section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act and 

invites stakeholders to submit any 

comments, data, and information they 

believe are relevant to the 

Administrator’s reconsideration of the 

January 2017 Mid-term Evaluation Final 

Determination and in particular, 

highlight any new information. As part 

of a 2012 joint final rulemaking by the 

EPA and NHTSA, the Mid-term 

Evaluation process was codified in EPA 

regulation for greenhouse gas emission 

standards for model years 2017–2025 

light-duty vehicles, which requires EPA 

to determine no later than April 1, 2018, 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS