alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0944

_____________________________
K ENNETH D. W ILLIAMS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. October 26, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R AY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Kenneth D. Williams, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 21

REGISTRANTS SUBSIDIARIES

The following table sets forth, at February 24, 2009, the Registrants
significant operating subsidiaries and other associated companies and their respective incorporation jurisdictions. The Registrant owns 100% of the voting securities of each of the subsidiaries listed below. There are no subsidiaries not listed in
the table, which would, in the aggregate, be considered significant.



|                                    |  |                       
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Active Subsidiaries                 |  | State of Incorporation
|ACH Supply LLC                      |  | Nevada                
|ACR Supply, LLC                     |  | Texas                 
|Air Systems Distributors LLC        |  | Delaware              
|Atlantic Service & Supply LLC       |  | Delaware              
|Baker Distributing Company LLC      |  | Delaware              
|Comfort Products Distributing, LLC  |  | Delaware              
|East Coast Metal Distributors LLC   |  | Delaware              
|Florida Cooling Supply LLC          |  | Nevada                
|Gemaire Distributors LLC            |  | Delaware              
|Heating & Cooling Supply LLC        |  | California            
|Tradewinds Distributing Company LLC |  | Delaware              
|Watsco Holdings, Inc.               |  | Delaware
Exhibit 32.1

OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jackson E. Reasor, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 12, 2009



/s/ JACKSON E. REASORJackson E. ReasorPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal executive officer)




27
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  245
<PP&E>                                         27,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                  9,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,164
<BONDS>                                        11,645
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,394  
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18,144
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  667
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                369
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (47)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (47)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (47)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
ex10-12.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit 10.12

     

    

     

    December
16, 2008

     

    Memorandum

     

    
      	
              To:

            	
              Mr.
      Gary Romig

            
	 
      	
              Vice
      President

            
	
              From:

            	
              Curtis
      Garner, CFO

            
	
              Re:

            	
              Otelco
      Employment Agreement and IRS Section 409A
  Compliance

            


    

     

    Dear
Gary:

     

    In order
to comply with recent changes to the final Treasury Regulations issued under
Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, your employment agreement must be amended by
December 31, 2008. By amending the agreement as described below, any
severance payments under the agreement will be exempt from the 409A deferred
compensation rules. In order to avoid the application of these rules, your
agreement must be amended to specifically state that any severance to be paid
must be paid no later than March 15 of the year following your termination.
Currently, the agreement does not specify that the amounts will be paid within a
certain time period. By making this change, your agreement will comply with the
rules under 409A that make it exempt from their application. I have attached a
copy of your current agreement for your reference. Failure to amend the
agreement by December 31, 2008, to be exempt from 409A, could result in the
amounts being subject to a 20% penalty tax.

     

    Please
sign and return to me by December 31, 2008, this letter evidencing your
agreement with the following amendment to your employment
agreement:

     

    Section
5(a)(iii) is amended to read as follows: “The Company shall pay to the Employee
a lump sum in the amount of one-half (1/2) of his Annual Base Salary within six
(6) months following termination but not later than March 14 of the calendar
year following termination; and”

    
      
        	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                Otelco
      Inc.

              
	 
      	
                /s/
      Curtis L. Garner

              
	 
      	
                Curtis
      L. Garner, Chief Financial
Officer

              


      

    

     

    I hereby
agree to the above amendment to my employment agreement.

    
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              /s/
      Gary B. Romig

            	 
      	
              December
      18, 2008

            
	
              Gary
      B. Romig
INTERNATIONAL FAST FOOD CORPORATION
         Exclusive Developer and Franchisee of Burger King Corporation
                           for the Republic of Poland
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  1000 Lincoln Road o Suite 200 o Miami Beach, Florida 33139 o (305) 531-5800

                            N e w s   R e l e a s e


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                       CONTACTS:
                                                      Mitchell Rubinson
November 10, 1997                                     Chairman of the Board


                INTERNATIONAL FAST FOOD CORPORATION COMPLETES
             PRIVATE OFFERING OF CONVERTIBLE SENIOR SUBORDINATED
                                DISCOUNT NOTES

          MIAMI BEACH, Fla. -- International Fast Food Corporation, (OTC: FOOD),
announced  that it sold  approximately  $27  million of 11%  convertible  senior
subordinated  discount  notes due 2007  through a private  offering  in which BT
Alex.Brown,  Incorporated  acted as Placement  Agent.  The Company  received net
proceeds of approximately $19 million.

            The Company  intends to use the net proceeds of the offering for the
development of new Burger King  restaurants  and Domino's Pizza stores in Poland
and for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

            The notes (and the shares of common stock  issuable upon  conversion
thereof) have not been registered  under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or any state  securities laws and,  unless so registered,  may not be offered or
sold  in the  United  States  except  pursuant  to an  exemption  from,  or in a
transaction not subject to, the registration  requirements of the Securities Act
and applicable state securities laws.

            This press release contains "forward-looking  statements" within the
meaning  of  the  Private  Securities   Litigation  Reform  Act  of  1995.  Such
forward-looking  statements  involve known and unknown risks,  uncertainties  or
other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the
Company to be  materially  different  from any future  results,  performance  or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking  statements.  For more
complete  information  concerning  factors  which  could  affect  the  Company's
results, reference is made to the Company's registration statements, reports and
other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange commission.

                                **************
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                   (in thousands except per share information)


                                                          FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                  -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            1997                  1996                    1995
                                  ------------------      -------------------     -------------------
                                               FULLY                    FULLY                   FULLY
                                  PRIMARY    DILUTED      PRIMARY     DILUTED     PRIMARY     DILUTED


<S>                               <C>        <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>    
Net Income                        $12,280    $12,280      $10,671     $10,671     $ 9,228     $ 9,228
                                  =======    =======      =======     =======     =======     =======

Weighted average
  common shares
  outstanding                      10,466     10,466       10,393      10,393      10,351      10,351

Incremental shares
  issuable for stock
  options outstanding
  (Treasury Stock Method)             536        657          538         538         465         532
                                  -------    -------      -------      ------      ------     -------

Common and common
  equivalent shares                11,002     11,123       10,931      10,931      10,816      10,883
                                  =======    =======      =======      ======      ======     -------

Earnings per share                 $ 1.12     $ 1.10      $   .98     $   .98      $  .85     $   .85
                                   ======     ======      =======     =======      ======     =======



</TABLE>




















                                       30

<PAGE>
S08Y0069.

#### IN THE MATTER OF WALTER RYAN DOGAN.

(653 SE2d 690)

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Special Master, Walter James Gordon, Sr., recommending disbarment. The State Bar filed a formal complaint, which Dogan failed to answer. Under Bar Rule 4-212 (a) he is in default and the facts alleged and violations charged are deemed admitted. Following issuance of the special master’s report, neither party sought review by the Review Panel, and thus Dogan has waived the right to file exceptions in this Court. See Bar Rule 4-217 (c) and (d).

Pursuant to the default, the following facts are admitted: Dogan lives in Jamaica, New York and has been a member of the State Bar since 1992; in 2005 the Georgia Department of Human Resources filed a child support case against Dogan; in connection with discovery served in that case, Dogan produced paycheck stubs that were fabricated and reflected weekly earnings substantially less than Dogan actually received; the trial court hearing the child support case found that Dogan fabricated the documents in order to deceive the court, found him in contempt, and sentenced him to 20 days in jail. The finding of criminal contempt was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. *Dogan v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources,*278 Ga. App. 905 (630 SE2d 140) (2006). Based on these facts, the special master concluded that Dogan violated Rules 3.3 (a) (4), 3.4, 3.5 (c), and 8.4 (a) (4), all of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d).

Having reviewed the record, we concur with the special master’s recommendation that disbarment is the appropriate sanction where *784a lawyer, with the intent to deceive and to harm another party, falsifies documents and relies upon those documents in a court proceeding. Therefore, we hereby order that the name of Walter Ryan Dogan be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Dogan is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Decided October 29, 2007

Reconsideration denied December 13, 2007.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Disbarred.*

*All the Justices concur.*
DAN MORALES 

ATTORNEY GNERAL 

QBffice of the !Zlttornep @eneral 

&date of ?a;exae 

Opinion O-6907 has been overruled by opinion 0-6907-A and 

withdrawn.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           WESCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          PERCENTAGE
                                                           OWNED BY                 STATE OF
        NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                REGISTRANT              INCORPORATION
        ------------------                                ----------              -------------
<S>                                                       <C>                     <C>
Wesco Holdings Midwest, Inc.............................     100%                  Nebraska
  Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc........................     100%                  Illinois
     Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc.,
        Charlotte Service Center........................     100%                  Delaware
     Precision Brand Products...........................     100%                  Delaware
  Wesco-Financial Insurance Company.....................     100%                  Nebraska
     Kansas Bankers Surety Company......................     100%                  Kansas
MS Property Company   ..................................     100%                  California
</TABLE>
Exhibit
      23.1

















CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
      ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
      consent to the incorporation by
      reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-115405 on Form S-3, and
      333-127889-01, 333-71990-01 and 333-63101-01 on Form S-8ofour reports dated February
      27, 2008,
      relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
      scheduleof
      Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
      and subsidiary (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
      an
      explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of a new accounting standard),
      and the effectiveness of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation's internal control
      over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
      Wisconsin Public Service Corporation for the year ended December 31,
      2007.

















Milwaukee,
      Wisconsin


February
      27, 2008
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN JAY STANWYCK,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 12-73136

Tax Ct. No. 533-07

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted July 26, 2016 ** 

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Steven Jay Stanwyck, a former attorney, appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s

order denying innocent spouse relief, and sustaining the Commissioner of Internal

Revenue’s collection action for the years 1991, 1997, and 1998. We dismiss the

appeal as moot. 

FILED

AUG 04 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Because the Internal Revenue Service has written off the unpaid balances of

Stanwyck’s 1991, 1997, and 1998 tax liabilities, and has released the related

federal tax lien, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See DiGiorgio v. Lee (In re Di

Giorgio), 134 F.3d 971, 974 (9th Cir. 1998) (“To qualify for adjudication in federal

court, an actual controversy must be extant at all stages of review, not merely at the

time the complaint is filed.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)); cf.

Greene-Thapedi v. Comm’r, 126 T.C. 1, 8 (2006) (“Inasmuch as the proposed levy

is moot, petitioner has no independent basis to challenge the existence or amount

of her underlying tax liability in this proceeding.”). 

We take judicial notice of the documents attached to the Commissioner’s

motion to dismiss the appeal as moot, filed on March 18, 2014. Stanwyck’s

motion to take judicial notice, filed on November 20, 2013, is denied as moot. 

DISMISSED. 

2 12-73136
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________ 

No. 19-3546 

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v. 

Leighton Lyle Leroy Munger

 Defendant - Appellant

____________ 

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

____________ 

Submitted: June 15, 2020

Filed: August 3, 2020 

[Unpublished] 

____________ 

Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________ 

PER CURIAM.

After Leighton Lyle Leroy Munger admitted to violating the conditions of 

supervised release by failing a drug test and leaving a halfway house without 

permission, the district court1 gave him a within-Guidelines-range sentence of 14 

1

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District 

of Minnesota. 
-2- 

months in prison. He challenges the substantive reasonableness of the sentence, 

including the weight placed on various mitigating factors. 

We conclude that Munger’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United 

States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (reviewing the reasonableness of 

a revocation sentence for an abuse of discretion); United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 

1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (stating that a within-Guidelines-range sentence is 

presumptively reasonable). The record establishes that the district court sufficiently 

considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3), and 

did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment. See United 

States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923–24 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we affirm the 

judgment of the district court. 

______________________________
No. 1143.

#### Gardner, Trustee, *v.*New Jersey.

June 10, 1946.

*James D. Carpenter, Jr., Howard L. Kern*and *Alexander H. Elder*for petitioner.

*Walter D. Van Riper,*Attorney General of New Jersey, and *Benjamin C. Van Tine*for respondent.

The petition for rehearing is granted. The order of May 20 denying certiorari, 328 U. S. 850, is vacated and the petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is granted.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

d0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148441

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148441

COA: 310472

Barry CC: 11-100158-FC

JASON LEE KEIPER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 12, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1



On January 16, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Quiksilver, Inc. (the
“Company”) approved a reduction in the annual base salaries (effective as of February 1, 2009) for
certain executive officers of the Company. The following table sets forth the reduced annual base
salary levels of such executive officers:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Position	 	Base Salary
	Robert B. McKnight, Jr.,
	 	$	903,000	 
	Chief Executive Officer and President
	 	 	 	 
	Charles S. Exon,
	 	$	404,000	 
	Chief Administrative Officer, Secretary and General Counsel
	 	 	 	 
	Pierre Agnes,
	 	€	332,500	 
	President — Quiksilver Europe