Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices 36707 

Travel Management Plan, 

Implementation, Butte, Lassen, 

Modoc, Plumas, Shasta, Siskiyou, 

Tehama Counties, CA, Comment 

Period Ends: 07/31/2009, Contact: 

Christopher O’Brien 530–257–2151. 

Revision of FR Notice Published on 

06/05/2009; Comment Review Period 

extended from 7/20/2009 to 7/31/ 

2009. 

EIS No. 20090181, Draft EIS, AFS, CA, 

Lower Trinity and Mad River 

Motorized Travel Management, 

Proposed to Prohibit Cross-County 

Motor Vehicle Travel Off Designated 

National Forest Transportation 

System (NFTS) Roads and Motorized 

Trails, Six River National Forest, CA, 

Comment Period Ends: 08/04/2009, 

Contact: Leslie Burkhart 707–441– 

3520 Revision to FR Notice Published 

06/05/2009: Extending Comment 

Period from 07/20/2009 to 08/04/ 

2009. 

Dated: July 21, 2009. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E9–17703 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8595–7] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments Availability of EPA 

Comments Prepared Pursuant to the 

Environmental Review Process (ERP), 

Under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act 

and Section 102(2)(c) of the National 

Environmental Policy Act as Amended 

Requests for copies of EPA comments 

can be directed to the Office of Federal 

Activities at 202–564–7146. An 

explanation of the ratings assigned to 

draft environmental impact statements 

(EISs) was published in FR dated July 

17, 2009 (74 FR 34754). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20090011, ERP No. D–SFW– 

K99041–CA, Tehachapi Uplands 

Multiple Species Habitat 

Conservation Plan (TUMSHCP), 

Propose Issuance of a 50-Year 

Incidental Take Permit for 27 Federaland State-Listed and Unlisted 

Species, Kern County, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about impacts 

to aquatic resources and to California 

condor. EPA recommended additional 

information for air quality, induced 

growth, transportation, visual and 

cumulative impacts. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20090091, ERP No. D–FRC– 

D05126–VA, Smith Mountain 

Pumped Storage Project (FERC No. 

2210–169). Application for 

Hydropower License to continue 

Operating the 636-megawatt Pumped 

Storage Project, Roanoke River, 

Bedford, Campbell, Franklin and 

Pittsylvania Counties, VA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about water 

temperature changes, the adaptive 

management process, and wetland 

impacts, and requested that a fish 

passage option be explored, and an 

environmental monitor be used. Rating 

EC2. 

EIS No. 20090126, ERP No. D–FHW– 

E40825–NC, Monroe Connector/ 

Bypass Project, Construction from 

Near I–485 at US &4 to US 74 between 

the Tons of Wingate and Marshville, 

Funding and US COE 404 Permit, 

North Carolina Turnpike Authority, 

Meckleburg and Union Counties, NC. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental objections about air and 

water quality impacts. EPA believes that 

this project will contribute additional 

VMTs and increased emissions and 

ultimately make achievement of the 

NAAQS less likely. Jurisdictional waters 

of the U.S. are currently impaired in the 

project study area from construction and 

related activities. Rating EO2. 

EIS No. 20090142, ERP No. D–NPS– 

K61170–CA, Yosemite National Park 

Project, Construction of Yosemite 

Institute Environment Education 

Campus, Implementation, Mariposa 

County, CA. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project, but requested 

additional information regarding 

applicability of Clean Air Act general 

conformity. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20090144, ERP No. D–GSA– 

K40271–CA, San Ysidro Land Port of 

Entry (LPOE) Improvement Project, 

Propose the Configuration and 

Expansion of the Existing (LPOE), San 

Ysidro, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about air 

quality impacts and recommended 

additional operational air quality 

analysis and measures to reduce 

congestion and emissions, including 

anti-idling methods. EPA also 

recommended environmental justice 

analysis of port facility users and 

improvements to intermodal 

accessibility. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20090155, ERP No. D–BIA– 

C65008–NY, Cayuga Indian Nation of 

New York Conveyance of Land into 

Trust Project, Approval of a 125 + 

Acre Fee-To-Trust Property Transfer 

of Seven Separate Parcel located in 

the Village of Union Springs and 

Town of Springport and Montezuma 

in Cayuga County and the Town of 

Seneca Falls in Seneca County, NY. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about the traffic 

analysis and related air quality impacts. 

Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20090160, ERP No. D–AFS– 

F65075–MN, Border Project, 

Proposing Forest Vegetation 

Management and Related 

Transportation System Activities, 

LaCroix Ranger District, Superior 

National Forest, St. Louis County, 

MN. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20090086, ERP No. DA–GSA– 

D81027–MD, U.S. Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) Headquarters 

Consolidation, Master Plan Update, 

Federal Research Center at White Oak, 

Silver Spring, Montgomery County, 

MD. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed action. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20090150, ERP No. DR–FHW– 

F40445–IN, I–69 Evansville to 

Indianapolis, Indiana Project, Section 

2, Revised to Update the Stream 

Impacts, Oakland City to Washington, 

(IN–64 to US 50), Gibson, Pike and 

Daviess Counties, IN. 

Summary: While EPA has no 

objection to the proposed action, it 

requested clarification of mitigation 

measures for wetlands, streams, upland 

forests, and clean diesel construction 

practices. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20090166, ERP No. DS–COE– 

G34030–LA, Calcasieu River and Pass, 

Louisiana Dredged Material 

Management Plan, Implementation, 

Calcasieu Ship Channel, Port of Lake 

Charles, Calcasieu and Cameron 

Parishes, LA. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

preferred alternative. Rating LO. 

Final EISs 

EIS No. 20090049, ERP No. F–COE– 

K36149–CA, San Diego Creek 

Watershed Special Area Management 

Plan/Watershed Streambed Alteration 

Agreement Process (SAMP/WSAA 

Process), Protecting and Enhancing 

Aquatic Resource and Permitting 

Reasonable Economic Development, 

Orange County, CA. 

Summary: EPA’s previous issues have 

been resolved; therefore, EPA does not 

object with the proposed action. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
36708 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices 

EIS No. 20090143, ERP No. F–FRC– 

L03014–OR, Jordan Cove Energy and 

Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline 

Project, Construction and Operation, 

Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Import 

Terminal and Natural Gas Pipeline 

Facilities, Coos, Douglas, Jackson and 

Klamath Counties, OR. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about the 

capacity of the ocean disposal site 

selected to receive maintenance dredge 

materials. 

EIS No. 20090174, ERP No. F–FHW– 

K50015–CA, Schuyler Heim Bridge 

Replacement and SR–47 Expressway 

Improvement Project, New 

Information related to Health Risk 

Associated with Air Toxics, Funding, 

U.S. Coast Guard Bridge Permit, U.S. 

Army COE Section 10 and 404 

Permits, Ports of Long Beach and Los 

Angeles, Los Angeles County, CA. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about 

environmental justice impacts and the 

inconsistent information on mobile 

source air toxics. 

EIS No. 20090180, ERP No. F–STA– 

F03012–00, Alberta Clipper Pipeline 

Project, Application for a Presidential 

Permit for Construction, Operation 

and Maintenance of Facilities in ND, 

MN and WI. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about wetland 

and stream crossing impacts. 

EIS No. 20090203, ERP No. F–NOA– 

E91021–00, Snapper Grouper 

Amendment 15B, Fishery 

Management Plan, Updated 

Information on the Economic 

Analysis for the Bag Limit Sales 

Provision, Update Management 

Reference Point for Golden Tilefish 

(Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps); 

Define Allocations for Snowy Grouper 

(Epinephelus niveatus) and Red Porgy 

(Pagrus pagrus), NC, SC, FL and GA. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed action. 

Dated: July 21, 2009. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E9–17706 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0516; FRL–8428–1] 

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; 

Notice of Public Meeting 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: There will be a 4–day 

meeting of the Federal Insecticide, 

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 

Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP) 

to consider and review Evaluation of 

Updated Standard Operating Procedures 

for Residential Exposure Assessment. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

October 6 – 9, 2009, from approximately 

8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

Comments. The Agency encourages 

that written comments be submitted by 

September 22, 2009 and requests for 

oral comments be submitted by 

September 29, 2009. However, written 

comments and requests to make oral 

comments may be submitted until the 

date of the meeting, but anyone 

submitting written comments after 

September 22, 2009 should contact the 

Designated Federal Official (DFO) listed 

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. For additional instructions, 

see Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. 

Nominations. Nominations of 

candidates to serve as ad hoc members 

of FIFRA SAP for this meeting should 

be provided on or before August 5, 

2009. 

Special accommodations. For 

information on access or services for 

individuals with disabilities, and to 

request accommodation of a disability, 

please contact the DFO listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT at least 

10 days prior to the meeting to give EPA 

as much time as possible to process 

your request. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Conference Center, Lobby Level, One 

Potomac Yard, (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202. 

Comments. Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0516, by 

one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail. Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery. OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket 

Facility’s normal hours of operation 

(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays). 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Docket Facility telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

Instructions. Direct your comments to 

docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0516. If your comments contain any 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected, please contact 

the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special 

instructions before submitting your 

comments. EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the docket without change and may be 

made available on-line at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

regulations.gov, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the docket and made available 

on the Internet. If you submit an 

electronic comment, EPA recommends 

that you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD-ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket. All documents in the docket 

are listed in the docket index available 

at http://www.regulations.gov. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either in the 

electronic docket at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 

4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 

2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The 

hours of operation of this Docket 

Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES