alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 20 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 20

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
                                 polio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

Mr. Payne submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 
  International Relations, and Financial Services, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
                                 polio.

Whereas polio has caused millions of casualties through history, paralyzing 
        millions and killing untold numbers of others;
Whereas polio remains a public health threat in today's world, despite being 
        easily preventable by vaccination;
Whereas polio is now limited to 10 countries, with the distinct possibility that 
        it can be once and forever extinguished as an affliction on mankind by 
        ensuring the vaccination of all children in these countries under the 
        age of 5;
Whereas a Global Polio Eradication Initiative exists that seeks to once and 
        forever end polio as an illness, which includes efforts underway by the 
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and
Whereas the United States has the capacity to act to speed the eradication of 
        polio by assisting in the targeting of its few remaining reservoirs: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses serious concern about the continuing menace 
        posed by polio;
            (2) implores the United Nations and its component agencies, 
        the private sector, private voluntary organizations and non-
        governmental organizations, concerned States, and international 
        financial institutions to act with haste and manifold 
        dedication to eradicate polio as soon as possible; and
            (3) calls upon the executive branch to provide the 
        necessary human and material resources to end the scourge of 
        polio once and for all, including closely monitoring laboratory 
        stocks of the polio virus.
                                 <all>
```
No. 1153.

#### Portland Tug & Barge Co. *v.*Upper Columbia River Towing Co. et al.

June 10, 1946.

*Donald A. Schafer*for petitioner.

*Carl E. Davidson*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 979.

#### 11,000 Acres of Land et al. *v.*United States.

April 29, 1946.

*C. G. Calhoun*and *W. M. Streetman*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General McGrath, J. Edward Williams*and *Roger P. Marquis*for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[No. 32325-7-II.

Division Two.

November 8, 2005.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Kristy W. House, *Respondent,*and John Stewart Wiborg, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 03-3-02758-7, Bruce W. Cohoe, J., entered October 4, 2004. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Armstrong and Hunt, JJ.
<PAGE>

                  GENWORTH LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
               WAIVER OF SURRENDER CHARGE - TERMINAL ILLNESS OR
              CONFINEMENT TO A MEDICAL CARE FACILITY ENDORSEMENT

This endorsement is added to the Contract. This endorsement is effective on the
Contract Date. It amends the CONTRACT VALUE BENEFITS section by adding the
following:

Waiver of Surrender Charge in the Event of Terminal Illness

We will waive the surrender charge for one or more withdrawals if, with respect
to any Annuitant:

   .   the Annuitant has been diagnosed with a terminal illness by a licensed
       physician; and

   .   a licensed physician certifies the Annuitant's medical condition is
       expected to result in death within [12 months] of such certification; and

   .   the diagnosis is supported by clinical, radiological, laboratory or
       other evidence of the medical condition; and

   .   the diagnosis was made at least [90 days] after the Contract Date; and

   .   we receive satisfactory proof that you have a terminal illness; and

   .   the withdrawal occurs after receipt of satisfactory proof.

All Annuitants must be age [80 or younger] on the Contract Date to be eligible
for this waiver.

Waiver of Surrender Charge in the Event of Confinement to a Medical Care
Facility

We will waive the surrender charge for one or more withdrawals if, with respect
to any Annuitant:

   .   the Annuitant enters a state-licensed facility providing medically
       necessary in-patient care (the "Facility"); and

   .   the confinement must be prescribed by a licensed physician in writing
       and be based on limitations that prohibit daily living in a
       non-institutional environment; and

   .   the Annuitant has spent at least [30 consecutive days] in the Facility;
       and

   .   the confinement began at least [90 days] after the Contract Date; and

   .   we receive satisfactory proof of such confinement; and

   .   we receive the request for the withdrawal in our administrative office
       while the Annuitant is confined or within [90 days] after the discharge
       from the Facility.

All Annuitants must be age [80 or younger] on the Contract Date to be eligible
for this waiver.

Satisfactory Proof

For purposes of the provisions above, satisfactory proof will include a
properly completed claim form and a written statement from a licensed
physician. The licensed physician must be someone other than you or your
relative. We reserve the right to obtain a second opinion at our expense and to
contest whether the illness is terminal or the confinement is medically
necessary.

For Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company,


                                                      /s/ Pamela S. Schutz
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                       [Pamela S. Schutz]
                                                            President

P5428 01/09
CLD-283 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 17-2195

___________

IN RE: MICHAEL BULLOCK,

 Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Related to E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 2-16-cv-01456)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

June 15, 2017

Before: SHWARTZ, NYGAARD and FISHER, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: June 22, 2017)

_________

OPINION*

_________

PER CURIAM

Petitioner Michael Bullock seeks a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1651, to compel the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

to issue a ruling on his habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

Bullock filed his § 2254 petition in March 2016. The Government filed a response 

to the habeas petition in June 2016. Two months later, the Magistrate Judge to whom the 

petition had been referred issued a Report recommending that the petition be denied. 

Bullock filed objections to that Report and Recommendation in early September 2016. 

At the time Bullock submitted his mandamus petition to this Court, his habeas petition 

had been ripe and pending for about nine months. However, the record reflects that the 

District Court dismissed the habeas petition by an Order entered on June 5, 2017, prior to 

the Clerk’s receipt of Bullock’s motion for leave to proceed with this mandamus petition

in forma pauperis. As the District Court has ruled on the habeas petition, Bullock has 

received the relief sought in his mandamus petition. Thus, we will dismiss the petition as 

moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996).

If Bullock wishes to seek appellate review of the District Court’s adverse decision 

with respect to his habeas petition, he should file his notice of appeal in the District Court 

within the time period set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 1997,  Consolidated  Statements of Operations for
the three months ended March 31, 1997,  Consolidated  Statements of Stockholders
Equity  (Deficit)  for the three months ended March 31, 1997,  and  Consolidated
Statements  of Cash Flow for the three  months  ended  March  31,  1997,  and is
qualified in its entirety be reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    144,328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               317,595
<PP&E>                                          34,835
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 541,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          302,537
<BONDS>                                        235,763
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      (6,144)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   541,713
<SALES>                                        126,322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,322
<CGS>                                          105,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (23,980)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (890)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (23,090)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (23,090)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.52)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                      Exhibit 12

                          West Texas Utilities Company
                       CRatio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                        For The Years Ended December 31

<CAPTION>

                                 2001      2000      1999      1998      1997
                                          (thousands, except ratios)
<S>                            <C>       <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>

Operating Income.............. $33,390   $52,341   $53,799   $59,276   $44,584
Adjustments
  Income Taxes................  18,733     6,552     4,186    28,088    11,294
  Provision for
    Deferred Income
      Taxes................... (11,891)    8,164    12,026    (6,626)     (945)
Deferred Investment
      Tax Credits.............  (1,271)   (1,271)   (1,275)   (1,321)   (1,321)
Changes for Investments and
  Plant Development Costs,
  Net of Tax..................    -         -         -         -         -
Other Income and Deductions...   2,199    (1,787)    2,126     2,034     1,237
Allowance for Borrowed and
  Equity Funds Used During
  Construction................   1,126     1,416     1,025     1,347       920
    Earnings.................. $42,286   $65,415   $71,887   $82,798  $ 55,769

Fixed Charges:
 Interest on
   Long-term Debt............. $16,842   $18,017   $20,352   $20,352   $20,352
 Interest on
   Short-term Debt............   7,563     6,503     4,731     4,580     4,911
    Fixed Charges............. $24,405   $24,520   $25,083   $24,932   $25,263

Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges...............    1.73      2.66      2.86      3.32      2.20

</TABLE>
1

The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2867

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Michael L. Jones, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 6, 2006 

Filed: October 18, 2006

___________

Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Jones appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed after he pleaded

guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting that the district court should have required the

government to file a motion for a downward departure based on Jones’s substantial

assistance.
-2-

Counsel’s argument is unavailing. See United States v. Romsey, 975 F.2d 556,

557-58 (8th Cir. 1992) (denial of defendant’s substantial-assistance

downward-departure motion was not error where government did not make motion,

even though government did not present its reasons, because plea agreement preserved

government’s discretion whether to make such motion and defendant made no

threshold showing of constitutionally impermissible motive). Having reviewed the

record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous

issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

______________________________
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 25, 2008 | Signed:  /s/  Terry D. Schumacher           
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                     | Terry D. Schumacher,
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.14.7

 



 

Date:                                                                  March 18, 2013

 

To:                                                                            Management Metric Based Bonus (MBB) Participants

 

From:                                                            Jim Lejeal

 

Regarding:                                Q1 & Q2 FY14 MBB Structure and Goal

 

To align MBB participants with the sales team’s bookings objectives for the 1H period, the 1H MBB program will be awarded and conditioned as follows:

 

The 1H MBB will be paid according to the Company’s performance against the Total Product Bookings assigned to the sales team as quota for the first half of the year.

 

For example, if the company performs at 110% of quota assignment for total product bookings — an MBB participant will earn 110% of their award for this period.

 

Rally will pay the MBB quarterly under the following conditions:

 

·                  A Q1 MBB payment will be paid to participants at 100% provided that the company exceeds 85% of new product bookings quota amount for Q1.

·                  The Q2 MBB payment will be paid to participants according to the company’s performance against the Total Product Bookings quota assignment amount for the first 6 months of the fiscal year.

·                  However, The Company must achieve 90% of the 1H new product bookings for the Q2 portion of the MBB to be paid.

·                  A total payment cap will apply and is set at 125%.

 

Target amounts, once set, will be communicated in the “Monday Team Meeting”.

 

True Up:

 

A “true-up” will take place on the Q2 payment.

 

·                  For example, if the Company performs to 115% of product bookings for 1H 2014 and 100% was paid for Q1 the additional 15% due on 1H will be paid with the Q2 payment.

 

Q1 Payment Recoverability:

 

Note that in the unlikely event the 90% of 1H FY14 bookings is not attained the Q1 bonus will be deemed earned based on achieving the 85% “new bookings” milestone for Q1.

 

Anticipated Payout Date:

 

It is anticipated Rally will

 

·                  pay the Q1 MBB between 15 May 13 and 30 May 13 and

·                  pay the Q2 MBB between 30 Aug 13 and 13 Sept 13
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER In connection with the Annual Report of The Washington Post Company (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 28, 2003 (the Report),
I, John B. Morse, Jr., Vice PresidentFinance (chief financial officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:
        March 9, 2004
        
        /s/ John B.
Morse, Jr.
          John B. Morse, Jr.
            Vice PresidentFinance
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         206,627
<SECURITIES>                                   147,103
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,524
<INVENTORY>                                    247,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               797,673
<PP&E>                                         870,872
<DEPRECIATION>                                 440,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,343,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          225,816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,496
<OTHER-SE>                                     969,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,343,126
<SALES>                                      1,937,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,954,174
<CGS>                                          850,666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,559,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                394,240
<INCOME-TAX>                                   122,614
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            271,626
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   271,626
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.34
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 963

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2777 Logan Avenue in San Diego, California, as the ‘‘Cesar E. Chavez 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2003

Mr. FILNER (for himself and Mrs. DAVIS of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2777 Logan Avenue in San Diego, California, as the ‘‘Cesar E. Chavez Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CESAR E. CHAVEZ POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The facility of the United 

5 States Postal Service located at 2777 Logan Avenue in 

6 San Diego, California, and known as the Southeastern 

7 Post Office, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Cesar 

8 E. Chavez Post Office’’. 
2

•HR 963 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Cesar E. Chavez Post 

5 Office.

Æ