alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF JUNE 30, 2014

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ------------------------------------------------------------------

None

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ---------------------------------------------------------------- --

WD76363 State of Missouri vs. Anthony D. Jordan
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 181 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         April 9, 2003.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1036) to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or 
continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms 
or ammunition for damages resulting from the misuse of their products by others. 
The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 
against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined 
to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 
amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. The 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. 
No amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 
in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be offered only in the order 
printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, 
shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 
report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall 
not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 
of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of 
order against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 
the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 
vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the 
bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3414 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3414

   To condition assistance to the West Bank and Gaza on steps by the 
  Palestinian Authority to end violence and terrorism against Israeli 
                               citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2016

Mr. Graham (for himself, Mr. Coats, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Kirk, Mr. 
Cotton, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Cruz, and Mr. Scott) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To condition assistance to the West Bank and Gaza on steps by the 
  Palestinian Authority to end violence and terrorism against Israeli 
                               citizens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taylor Force Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ASSISTANCE TO THE WEST BANK AND GAZA.

    Funds appropriated or otherwise made available for assistance under 
chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2346 et seq.; relating to Economic Support Fund) and available for 
assistance for the West Bank and Gaza may only be made available for 
such purpose if the Secretary of State certifies to the appropriate 
congressional committees that the Palestinian Authority--
            (1) is taking credible steps to end acts of violence 
        against United States and Israeli citizens that are perpetrated 
        by individuals under its jurisdictional control, such as the 
        March 2016 attack that killed former United States Army officer 
        Taylor Force, a veteran of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan;
            (2) is publicly condemning such acts of violence and is 
        taking steps to investigate or is cooperating in investigations 
        of such acts to bring the perpetrators to justice; and
            (3) has terminated payments for acts of terrorism against 
        United States and Israeli citizens to any individual who has 
        been imprisoned after being fairly tried and convicted for such 
        acts of terrorism and to any individual who died committing 
        such acts of terrorism, including to a family member of such 
        individuals.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
means--
            (1) the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on 
        Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
            (2) the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on 
        Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 2

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 7, 2003.

Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum of

the House of Representatives has assembled; that J. Dennis

Hastert, a Representative from the State of Illinois, has been

elected Speaker; and Jeffrey J. Trandahl, a citizen of the

State of South Dakota, has been elected Clerk of the House

of Representatives of the One Hundred Eighth Congress.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7762

KEVIN ELWOOD BULLOCK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

A. MENDOZA, Acting Warden; FCI WILLIAMSBURG,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:21-cv-03205-JFA)

Submitted: September 27, 2022 Decided: October 17, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Elwood Bullock, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7762 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/17/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Elwood Bullock, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order and 

judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

Bullock’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which Bullock challenged his revocation sentence. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. 

Bullock v. Mendoza, No. 0:21-cv-03205-JFA (D.S.C. Dec. 9, 2021). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7762 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/17/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 123, Misc.

#### In re Dominion of Canada.

June 3, 1946.

*Lane Summers, F. T. Merritt*and *G. H. Bucey*for petitioner.

The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.
Exhibit 11 - Statement re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings:

Net Income Per Common Share Per Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
  No. 128:


                                          2001        2000        1999
                                      ----------   ----------   ----------
Numerator-
  Net income-
    Basic & Diluted                   $  452,000   $1,224,000   $  614,000

Denominator-
  Weighted average common shares
      outstanding - Basic              7,914,547    8,160,546    8,559,051
   Incremental shares from assumed
       conversions of stock options         --           --           --
                                      ----------   ----------   ----------
Weighted average common shares
   outstanding - Diluted               7,914,547    8,160,546    8,559,374

Basic earnings per share              $     0.06   $     0.15   $     0.07
Diluted earnings per share            $     0.06   $     0.15   $     0.07
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1171

_____________________________
T ROY L EE P ARKER J R , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court f or Bay County

. Brantley S. Clark, Jr. , Judge

. November 30, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , M AKAR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender
, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                             233
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,064
<PP&E>                                          61,007
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,927
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,077
<SALES>                                         25,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,415
<CGS>                                           20,831
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,325)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,959)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.50)


</TABLE>
[No. 31885-7-II.

Division Two.

December 13, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Aaron James Lawrence, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 04-1-00486-1, Barbara D. Johnson, J., entered June 17, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., and Morgan, J. Pro Tern.
Amendment to Offer Letter - Jane Moffitt



 EXHIBIT 10.20 
  

					
	 


	 	 115 Sansome Street, Suite #310
 San Francisco, California 94104
	  	 (415) 415-7880 Tel.
 (415) 875-7075 Fax


 10 March 2009 
 Jane Moffitt 
 460 Nimitz Avenue 
 Redwood City, CA
94061 
  

	Re:	Amendment to Offer Letter 

 Dear Jane: 
 Nile Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to offer an amendment to your current terms of employment as set forth in that offer letter
dated April 25, 2008, as amended to date (the “Existing Offer Letter”). Effective upon your agreement with the terms of this letter, the paragraph in the Existing Offer Letter beginning with “For purposes of this letter, a
‘Change in Control’ shall mean . . .” shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 For purposes of this
letter, a “Change in Control” shall mean a transaction or series of transactions (other than an offering of the Company’s stock to the general public through a registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission)
whereby any “person” or related “group” of “persons” (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (other than the Company, any
of its subsidiaries, an employee benefit plan maintained by the Company or any of its subsidiaries or a “person” that, prior to such transaction, directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the
Company) directly or indirectly acquires beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of securities of the Company possessing more than 50% of the total combined voting power of the Company’s securities
outstanding immediately after such acquisition. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no transaction shall be considered a Change of Control for the purposes of this letter: (A) if the stockholders existing prior to such transaction(s) hold in the
aggregate more than fifty percent (50%) of the securities or assets of the surviving or resulting company; or (B) in connection with a private placement of equity securities of the Company in connection with a financing of the
Company’s on-going operations. 
 While the Existing Offer Letter with be amended and restated as set forth above, the remainder of your
Existing Offer Letter shall otherwise remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Please indicate your agreement with these terms by signing and dating the enclosed duplicated original of this letter agreement and returning it to me. 

 

			
	Sincerely,
	
	Nile Therapeutics, Inc.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Peter Strumph
		 	Peter Strumph
		 	Chief Executive Officer


 I have read and accept this amendment to my Existing Offer Letter: 
  

					
	Date: 10 March 2009	 		 	/s/ Jane Moffitt

  

 Page 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     Consolidated Balance Sheets at November 1, 1997 and the Consolidated
     Statements of Operations for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 1, 1997
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                       11,575,600
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2,680,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                     48,800
<INVENTORY>                                  44,958,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             65,811,700
<PP&E>                                       48,006,600
<DEPRECIATION>                              (16,989,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               99,818,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        13,212,900
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     38,269,100
<OTHER-SE>                                  (28,454,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 99,818,200
<SALES>                                     142,851,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            142,851,900
<CGS>                                        91,082,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                91,082,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             47,022,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            7,238,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (5,386,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     53,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (5,440,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (5,440,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.50
        


</TABLE>
#### Dennis Wade GILBERT, Petitioner-Appellant v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 12-60438

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 18, 2012.

Dennis Wade Gilbert, Austin, TX, pro se.

Sara Ann Ketchum, John Dicicco, U.S. Department of Justice, William Jenkins, *259Internal Revenue Service, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This court of appeals is authorized by law to rule on any error of law made by the Tax Court. The error must be pointed out to the court of appeals. By error, it is meant an error of law.

This court recognizes Mr. Gilbert’s objection to being referred to as a taxpayer and his various discussions of rules and opinions. But nothing is said that points to an error of law made by the Tax Court. Therefore, the judgment must be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. p
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>5
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                            2,878,000
<SECURITIES>                    387,794,000
<RECEIVABLES>                    32,439,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                     159,347,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                590,644,000
<PP&E>                          343,900,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  966,312,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           127,389,000
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0 
<COMMON>                          7,380,000
<OTHER-SE>                      921,572,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    966,312,000
<SALES>                       1,753,246,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,753,246,000
<CGS>                         1,300,841,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,300,841,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 120,709,000
<INCOME-TAX>                     41,854,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              78,855,000
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     78,855,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         1.870
<EPS-DILUTED>                         1.870
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3461 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to refund or credit 

certain excess payments made to the Commission. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 

Mr. KIRK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to refund or credit certain excess payments made to the Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securities and Ex5 change Commission Overpayment Credit Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFUNDING OR CREDITING OVERPAYMENT OF SEC7 TION 31 FEES. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

9 (1) the term ‘‘Commission’’ means the Securi10 ties and Exchange Commission; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3461 IS

1 (2) the term ‘‘national securities association’’ 

2 means an association that is registered under section 

3 15A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 

4 U.S.C. 78o–3); and 

5 (3) the term ‘‘national securities exchange’’ 

6 means an exchange that is registered as a national 

7 securities exchange under section 6 of the Securities 

8 Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78f). 

9 (b) CREDIT FOR OVERPAYMENT OF FEES.—Notwith10 standing section 31(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

11 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78ee(j)), and subject to subsection (c) 

12 of this section, if a national securities exchange or a na13 tional securities association has paid fees and assessments 

14 to the Commission in an amount that is more than the 

15 amount that the exchange or association was required to 

16 pay under section 31 of the Securities Exchange Act of 

17 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78ee) and, not later than 10 years after 

18 the date of such payment, the exchange or association in19 forms the Commission about the payment of such excess 

20 amount, the Commission shall offset future fees and as21 sessments due by that exchange or association in an 

22 amount that is equal to the difference between the amount 

23 that the exchange or association paid and the amount that 

24 the exchange or association was required to pay under 

25 such section 31. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3461 IS

1 (c) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (b) shall apply only 

2 to fees and assessments that a national securities ex3 change or a national securities association was required 

4 to pay to the Commission before the date of enactment 

5 of this Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS