alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM OF INDEMNIFICATION LETTER AGREEMENT




Exhibit 10.3


FORM OF INDEMNITY LETTER AGREEMENT

TO NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


March 5, 2009


Reference is hereby made to Article IX of the By-laws of The Valspar
Corporation (the “Company”) as in effect as of the date hereof (the “Company
Indemnity Bylaws”). In consideration of your prior and continuing service to
the Company, the Company agrees that your rights under the Company Indemnity
Bylaws to be indemnified to the fullest extent permitted by law and to
advancement of expenses are contract rights that shall be incorporated into
this letter agreement and shall continue even after your association with the
Company terminates, and that such rights shall be for your benefit and for the
benefit of your heirs, executors and administra­tors. The Company further
confirms that your rights under the Company Indemnity Provisions shall apply
during and after your term of service with the Company without regard to
whether any actual or alleged state of facts, occurrence, action or omission (collectively
“Circumstances”) that may give rise to a claim, action, suit or proceeding
(collectively “Claims”) with respect to which you may have rights under the
Company Indemnity Provisions shall have occurred, or whether any such Claim
shall have accrued or been made, before, during or after such term of service.
Any amendment, modification, alteration or repeal of the Company Indemnity
Bylaws shall be prospective only and shall not in any way diminish, limit,
restrict, adversely affect or eliminate any of your rights to indemnification,
advancement of expenses or otherwise under the Company Indemnity Bylaws with
respect to any Circumstances then or previously existing, or any Claim
previously or thereafter brought or threatened based in whole or in part upon
any such Circumstances.


This letter agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Delaware, and may not be amended or modified except by an instrument in writing
signed by both parties hereto.


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
THE VALSPAR
 CORPORATION

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
By:

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
Name: 

	
Rolf Engh

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
Title: 

	
Executive
 V.P., General Counsel

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
and
 Secretary

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Accepted and
 Agreed to:

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
(Signature)
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 154 (Friday, August 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 37617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16972]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Civil Service Retirement System Board of Actuaries Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Civil Service Retirement System Board of Actuaries plans 
to meet on Thursday, September 7, 2017. The meeting will start at 1:00 
p.m. EDT and will be held at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management 
(OPM), 1900 E Street NW., Room 4332, Washington, DC 20415.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Kissel, Senior Actuary for 
Retirement Programs, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street 
NW., Room 4316, Washington, DC 20415. Phone (202) 606-0722 or email at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is for the Board 
to review the actuarial methods and assumptions used in the valuations 
of the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund (CSRDF), in the 
event of a change in applicable law or regulations governing the 
selection of actuarial assumptions.
    The agenda is as follows:

1. Summary of changes established after June 1, 2017, in legislation or 
regulations
2. Review of actuarial assumptions if warranted by such changes:
    a. Demographic Assumptions
    b. Economic Assumptions

Persons desiring to attend this meeting of the Civil Service Retirement 
System Board of Actuaries, or to make a statement for consideration at 
the meeting, should contact OPM at least 5 business days in advance of 
the meeting date at the address shown below. The manner and time for 
any material presented to the Board may be limited.

    For the Board of Actuaries.

Kathleen M. McGettigan,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 2017-16972 Filed 8-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6325-63-P
```
IV 

House Calendar No. 79

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 312

[Report No. 108–192] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2660) making appropriations 

for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2004, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2003

Ms. PRYCE, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2660) making 

appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health 

and Human Services, and Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and 

for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 2660) making appropriations for 
2

HRES 312 RH 

1 the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, 

2 and Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year 

3 ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. The 

4 first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points 

5 of order against consideration of the bill are waived. Gen6 eral debate shall be confined to the bill. After general de7 bate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 

8 five-minute rule. All points of order against provisions in 

9 the bill are waived except section 217(b). Where points 

10 of order are waived against part of a section, points of 

11 order against a provision in another part of such section 

12 may be made only against such provision and not against 

13 the entire section. During consideration of the bill for 

14 amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 

15 may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether 

16 the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be 

17 printed in the portion of the Congressional Record des18 ignated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amend19 ments so printed shall be considered as read. At the con20 clusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

21 Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

22 such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 

23 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

24 amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
3

HRES 312 RH 

1 motion except one motion to recommit with or without in2 structions. 
House Calendar No. 79

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 312

[Report No. 108–192] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2660) 

making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. 

JULY 8, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
# 19SNR08_00
[No. 55575-8-I.

Division One.

November 14, 2005.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Raymond R. LaPlante, *Appellant,*and Cathy E. LaPlante, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Rang County, No. 99-3-04309-3, Glenna Hall, J., entered December 16, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     EXHIBIT 21



                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


     The following is a list of the active subsidiaries of the Company as of
March 25, 1997, indicating the jurisdiction of incorporation of each and the
names under which such subsidiaries conduct business.  In the case of each
subsidiary which is indented, its immediate parent owns beneficially all of the
capital stock, except BrookeMil Ltd., of which the Company owns approximately
99.1% of such voting securities.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


        NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                 JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
         <S>                                         <C>
         Ladenburg, Thalmann Group Inc.              Delaware
         Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co. Inc.              Delaware
         Thinking Machines Corporation               Delaware
         BrookeMil Ltd.                              Cayman Islands
         ALKI Corp.                                  Delaware
</TABLE>

     Not included above are other subsidiaries which, if considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant
subsidiary, as such term is defined by Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2260

ALEXIS B. CASTILLO NAJERA, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A96-446-367) Submitted: May 5, 2006 Decided: June 27, 2006 Before MICHAEL and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas A. Elliot, Thomas K. Ragland, ELLIOT & MAYOCK, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Donald E. Keener, Deputy Director, Alison Marie Igoe, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Alexis B. Castillo Najera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) order finding him removable as a result of a state conviction for possession of cocaine. Najera contends the charge to which he pled guilty is not a conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(48)(A)(2000). He further contends it is a violation of his right to equal protection. We deny the petition for review. We find there is no merit to Najera’s claim that the prior conviction for drug possession should not be considered a conviction for removability purposes. See Acosta v. Ashcroft , 341 F.3d 218, 222 (3d Cir. 2003). We further find no merit to Najera’s equal protection claim. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
ex_10-16.htm


    

     

    December
16, 2008

     

    Memorandum

    
      
        	 
      	 
      
	
                To:

              	
                Mr.
      Nick Winchester

              
	 
      	
                Senior
      Vice President

              
	
                From:

              	
                Curtis
      Garner, CFO

              
	
                Re:

              	
                Otelco
      Employment Agreement and IRS Section 409A
  Compliance

              


      

    

     

    Dear
Nick:

     

    In order
to comply with recent changes to the final Treasury Regulations issued under
Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, your employment agreement must be amended by
December 31, 2008. By amending the agreement as described below, any severance
payments under the agreement will be exempt from the 409A deferred compensation
rules. In order to avoid the application of these rules, your agreement must be
amended to specifically state that any severance to be paid must be paid no
later than March 15 of the year following your termination. Currently, the
agreement does not specify that the amounts will be paid within a certain time
period. By making this change, your agreement will comply with the rules under
409A that make it exempt from their application. I have attached a copy of your
current agreement for your reference. Failure to amend the agreement by December
31, 2008, to be exempt from 409A, could result in the amounts being subject to a
20% penalty tax.

     

    Please
sign and return to me by December 31, 2008, this letter evidencing your
agreement with the following amendment to your employment
agreement:

     

    Section
5(a)(iii) is amended to read as follows: “The Company shall pay to the Employee
a lump sum in the amount of one-half (1/2) of his Annual Base Salary within six
(6) months following termination but not later than March 14 of the calendar
year following termination; and”

    
      
        
          	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  Otelco
      Inc.

                
	 
      	
                  /s/
      Curtis L. Garner

                
	 
      	
                  Curtis
      L. Garner, Chief Financial
Officer

                


        

      

    

     

    I hereby
agree to the above amendment to my employment agreement.

    
      
        	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                /s/
      Nicholas A. Winchester

              	 
      	
                December
      31, 2008

              
	
                Nicholas
      A. Winchester
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Orlando STRAW, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-1102.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2013.

Filed: April 22, 2013.

Daniel C. Tvedt, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John D. Jacobsen, Jacobsen *&*Johnson, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Orlando Straw, Chicago, IL, pro se.

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After Orlando Straw admitted violating his release conditions, the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 9 months in prison with no supervision to follow. Straw appeals, arguing that his sentence is unreasonable and that the court improperly weighed the sentencing factors. We disagree. The record shows that the district court properly considered the relevant sentencing factors before imposing a revocation sentence that was authorized by statute and within the applicable Guidelines range. *See*18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3); *United States v. Petreikis,*551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir.2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines range); *United States v. White Face,*383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir.2004) (court need not list every § 3553(a) factor when sentencing defendant upon revocation of supervised release).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We also grant counsel leave to withdraw, subject to counsel informing Shaw about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certio-rari.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
Exhibit 32.1

                      OFFICERS' SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

         The  undersigned  officers of  CabelTel  International  Corporation,  a
Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certifies that (i) the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the
periods indicated.

         Dated: January 16, 2006.

                                        /s/ Ronald C. Finley
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Ronald C. Finley, Chief Executive Officer



                                        /s/ Gene S. Bertcher
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Gene S. Bertcher, President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32
   Section
1350 Certification
  
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)
 
 
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of WHX Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Corporation”), does hereby certify that:
 
 The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Form
10-K”) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
 
 
 
 /s/ Glen M.
Kassan
 Glen M.
Kassan
 Principal
Executive Officer
 March 31,
2008
  
 
 
 /s/ Robert K.
Hynes
 Robert K.
Hynes
 Principal
Financial Officer
  March 31,
2008
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 205

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 

House. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2003

Mr. KINGSTON submitted the following resolution 

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing 

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following Member be and is hereby 

2 elected to the following standing committee of the House 

3 of Representatives: 

4 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES: Mr. Putnam.

Æ
Exhibit 10.44


 


Summary of Premiere Global Services, Inc.



Non-Employee Director Compensation


 


Cash Compensation


	Board
    Annual Retainer1	
        $50,000

         

	
        Scheduled Board Meeting Fees

        (for 100% attendance at four quarterly, regularly scheduled board
        meetings)
	
        $10,000

         

	Special Board Meeting Fee	$1,000
	Per Diem Fee	$1,250/day for special projects and director training as authorized by us
	 	 
	Committee Annual Retainers: 1	 
	Audit Committee	
        Chairman $10,000

        Member $5,000

	Compensation Committee	
        Chairman $10,000

        Member $5,000

	Nominating and Governance Committee	
        Chairman $5,000

        Member $2,500

	 	 
	Lead Independent Director Fee1	$20,000


 


Equity Compensation


 


	Board
    Annual Equity Award2 	$160,000
	 	 
	
        Committee Annual Equity Awards:2

         

        Audit Committee
	
         

         

         

        Chairman $10,000

        Member $5,000

	Compensation Committee	
        Chairman $10,000

        Member $5,000

	Nominating and Governance Committee	
        Chairman $5,000

        Member $2,500

         



 







1             Annual cash retainers and
the lead independent director fee will be paid in four quarterly installments, provided that an individual remains a board/committee
member/lead independent director on such date.


 


2             Annual
equity awards in the form of restricted stock will be granted in four quarterly installments on the last day of each calendar
quarter, provided that an individual remains a board/committee member on such date. The shares of restricted stock granted on
such date will vest immediately in recognition of service during the prior quarter. The number of shares to be granted as equity
compensation will be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the applicable award by the fair market value per share of our
common stock on the grant date, with any partial shares to be paid in cash. One-half of the shares granted are subject to a holding
period until a director meets our stock ownership guidelines. Upon a change in control of our company (as defined in our amended
and restated 2000 directors stock plan, as amended), each of our non-employee directors would receive a grant equal to the annual
grants for the prospective year; provided that the director is a member of our board on such date.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet at March 31, 2000 and the statement of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,669,374
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,971,636
<PP&E>                                       2,066,455
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,935,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,107,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,170,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       324,912
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,599,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,107,672
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,170
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,808,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (20,758,836)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (20,758,836)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (20,758,836)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-41305

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEONARDO MUNIZ-FIGUEROA, also known as Leonardo Muniz,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CR-246-1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Leonardo Muniz-Figueroa 

raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. 

Rodriguez-Escareno, 700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 133 S. 

Ct. 2044 (2013), which held that the sentence enhancement provided for in 

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) applies to a conviction for the federal crime of 

conspiracy to commit a federal drug trafficking offense. The unopposed motion 

for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court 

is AFFIRMED. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-41305 Document: 00512750893 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014