alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Raymond E. McElhaney, Chief Executive Officer and I, Bill M. Conrad,
Chief Financial Officer of Wyoming Oil & Minerals, Inc. (the "Company") certify
that:

     1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Wyoming Oil &
Minerals, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

Date:    June 14, 2004


/s/ Raymond E. McElhaney
------------------------
Raymond E. McElhaney,
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Bill M. Conrad
-----------------------
Bill M. Conrad,
Chief Financial Officer







<PAGE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  January 13, 2011 | Signed:  /s/  "Murray G. Smith"         
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------
|                        | Murray G. Smith,
Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 19, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00845

- CR

John Anthony KOSHGARIAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR7331 Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On December 17, 2019, appellant’s appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, asserting appellant has retained Mr. Dante Eli Dominguez as his appellate attorney. Attached to the motion to withdraw is a notice of appearance filed in the trial court on December 9, 2019. The notice of appearance was filed after the notice of appeal was filed, and Mr. Dominguez has not filed any notice in this court stating he represents appellant. It is

therefore ORDERED that the motion to withdraw i s HELD IN ABEYANCE. Mr. Dominguez is ORDERED to file notice in this court no later than ten days from the date of this order stating

whether or not he represents appellant in this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.2.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of December, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3163 

_____________________________

LORENZO LAVERNE GILMORE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Union County.

Mitchell D. Bishop, Judge.

August 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Lorenzo Laverne Gilmore, pro se; Jessica J. Yeary, Public 

Defender, and Pamela D. Presnell, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-1358

_____________________________

STEPHEN HAWKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

October 15, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Stephen Hawkins, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A1 97 6 . KENNETH GERARD BROW N v . THE STATE.

Ken n et h Gerard Bro wn p l ed g u i l ty t o t wo co u n t s o f cri m i n al t res p as s

, an d t h e

t ri al co u rt en t ered h i s ju d g m en t o f co n v ict i on o n M arch 2 9, 20 1 6

. Bro wn fi l ed a p ro

s e n o ti ce o f ap p eal o n M ay 9 , 2 0 1 6 . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

To b e t i m el y

, a no t i ce o f ap p eal m us t b e f i l e d w i t h i n 3 0 d ay s of en t ry o f t h e

o rd er o n a p p e a l

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e pro p er an d t i m el y fi l i ng o f a n o t i ce

o f a p p e a l i s an ab s o l u te req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s di ct io n o n t h i s Co u rt

. Se e

Ro wl a n d v. S t a t e

, 2 64 Ga. 87 2

, 8 7 2 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 9 9 5). Becau s e Bro wn fi l ed

h i s n o t i ce o f ap p eal 4 1 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t he o rd er h e s eek s t o ap p eal

, i t is un t i m el y

.

Acco rd in g ly , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i on

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 08/03/2016 August 03, 2016
#### In the Matter of Varsey Johnson, Petitioner, v Joseph Smith, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 750]

*1117Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination which found him guilty of refusing a direct order and creating a disturbance. According to the misbehavior report, although petitioner was among a group of inmates in the commissary area that was twice given a direct order to lower their voices, petitioner nevertheless continued to speak in a loud manner. The misbehavior report and the hearing testimony of the correction officer that authored it provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see *Matter of Sanders v Goord,*47 AD3d 987, 988 [2008]; *Matter of Martin v Goord,*46 AD3d 1294, 1295 [2007]). Petitioner’s claim that he was not among the group involved in the incident created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see *Matter of Martin v Goord,*46 AD3d at 1295; *Matter of Smith v Goord,*45 AD3d 1119, 1120 [2007]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to inform him of the charges and to enable him to prepare a defense (see *Matter of Reddick v Goord,*42 AD3d 764, 764 [2007]; *Matter of Morillo v Goord,*38 AD3d 947, 948 [2007]). Petitioner’s remaining claim of hearing officer bias is not preserved and, in any event, is not persuasive.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ KAREN B. RHOADS                                              |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Karen      B. Rhoads                                             |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer (principal accounting officer) |
|   | June      11, 2009                                               |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 216 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 216

Congratulating the Hastings College women's basketball team for winning 
2 consecutive National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA) 
                  Division II national championships.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2003

 Mr. Osborne submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the Hastings College women's basketball team for winning 
2 consecutive National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA) 
                  Division II national championships.

Whereas the Hastings College women's basketball team of Hastings, Nebraska, has 
        won 2 consecutive National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics 
        (NAIA) Division II national championships;
Whereas, in the 2002-2003 season, the team compiled a 33-5 record and defeated 
        conference rival Dakota Wesleyan, 59-53 in the final;
Whereas, in the 2001-2002 season, the team compiled a 34-3 record and defeated 
        Cornerstone University, 73-69 in the final;
Whereas, in the 2003 final, the Broncos were led by their senior center 
        Elizabeth Herbek, who scored 16 points and grabbed 6 rebounds in the 
        victory, and was named the NAIA Division II Player of the Year for the 
        2002-03 season, national tournament Most Valuable Player, and a first 
        team All-American;
Whereas also scoring in double figures were sophomore guard Jami Lipker, with 13 
        points, and junior guard Carrie Hoffstetter, who was named to the 
        national tournament first team, with 12 points;
Whereas junior Carly Stucky was named to the national tournament second team and 
        the All-America second team;
Whereas second year Head Coach Tony Hobson was named NAIA Division II Coach of 
        the Year for both championship seasons; and
Whereas the championship team also included Katie Dent, Sandy Gowen, Jackie 
        Hoffman, Ashley Huerta, Stephanie Keliiholakai, Lynnze Martinsen, Amanda 
        McKenzie, Kari Ring, Stephanie Shaw, Kari Taylor, and assistant coaches 
        Emily Stucky and Meg Wilson: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the 
Hastings College women's basketball team of Hastings, Nebraska, for 
winning 2 consecutive National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics 
(NAIA) Division II national championships.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Willamette Industries, Inc.:

   We consent to incorporation  by reference in the Registration  Statements No.
33-5847, No. 33-59515 and No. 33-59517 on Form S-8 and No. 333-32647 on Form S-3
of Willamette  Industries,  Inc. of our report dated February 12, 1998, relating
to  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Willamette   Industries,   Inc.  and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31, 1997 and 1996,  and the related  consolidated
statements  of  earnings,  stockholders'  equity  and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year  period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in
the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Willamette Industries, Inc.


                              /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Portland, Oregon
March 18, 1998
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2


                                    AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                              E-SYNC NETWORKS, INC.


        E-Sync Networks, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

        FIRST: that at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation,
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable and calling a meeting of stockholders of the Corporation for
consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as
follows:

                      RESOLVED, that Article FIRST of the Corporation's
               Certificate of Incorporation shall be amended and restated in its
               entirety, subject to stockholder approval, to read as follows:

                             "FIRST: The Name of the Corporation is ESNI, Inc."

        SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of
Directors, an annual meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation was duly
called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, at which meeting the necessary number
of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

        THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

<PAGE>

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, E-Sync Networks, Inc. has caused this certificate to
be signed by Michael A. Clark, its President and Chief Operating Officer, this
13th day of February, 2002.

                                     E-SYNC NETWORKS, INC.



                                     By:   /s/ Michael A. Clark
                                         -------------------------------------
                                           Michael A. Clark
                                           President and Chief Operating Officer




                                      -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                           6,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,901
<PP&E>                                          55,940
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,915)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,430
<BONDS>                                          4,790
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,975
<COMMON>                                       156,095
<OTHER-SE>                                   (137,254)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,926
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,842)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (248)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,242)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,242)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,242)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered August 8 , 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00823

- CR

WILLIE MAURICE HERVE Y, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 89th District Court

Wichita County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 57,785

- C



### O RDER

Before the Court is the State’s August 6, 2018 motion to extend time to file its brief. We

GRANT the motion and ORDER the State’s brief due on or before September 5, 2018.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          21,851
<SECURITIES>                                    59,012
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,472
<PP&E>                                          29,871
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,027
<BONDS>                                         10,570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           193
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,729
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,370
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,845)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,845)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,845)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.82)


</TABLE>
EX-10.28






Exhibit 10.28




POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.




Summary Sheet of Compensation of Non-Employee Directors 




	 	 	 
	Cash Retainer:

	 	$3,000 per month
	 
	 	 
	Board Chairman Fees:

	 	$12,500 per year
	 
	 	 
	Committee Chairman Fees:

	 	$7,500 per year
	 
	 	 
	Meeting Fees:

	 	$1,500 per meeting of a Committee of the Board,
provided only one meeting fee is payable per day,
regardless of how many meetings are held that day
	 
	 	 
	Restricted Stock Grants:

	 	Upon initial election, $100,000 in fair market
value (valued based upon the average closing sale
price of the Common Stock for the 12 months
preceding the date of grant, as reported on its
principal trading stock exchange or market) of
restricted shares of Common Stock, vesting in
three equal annual installments
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Upon re-election, $50,000 in fair market value
(valued upon date of grant based upon the closing
sale price of the Common Stock as reported on its
principal stock trading exchange or market) of
restricted shares of Common Stock, vesting in
four equal quarterly installments
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

No. 98-40213 Summary Calendar

_________________________________

MICHAEL A. MCCANN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. JOE KING, Sheriff; CLARENCE BALL, Agent; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(G-97-CV-673)

---------------------------------

March 22, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael A. McCann appeals from the judgment of the district court dismissing his action against the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and an IRS revenue agent. On appeal, he contends that the district court erred in failing to remand to state court his action for replevin which he had originally filed in the state court. McCann’s appeal and the arguments contained in his brief are not only devoid2

of merit, but are wholly frivolous. It is firmly established and beyond dispute that because McCann brought his suit in state court against a federal officer and a federal agency, it was removable under 28 U.S.C. § 1442. The fact that federal law prohibits a replevin action for the return of property seized pursuant to federal revenue laws is not germane to the issue of removability. Appellant confuses the non-availability of a remedy with the jurisdiction of the federal court to declare that no such remedy is available under the law. The remedy McCann seeks is not available in any court, not simply the federal
courts. See 26 U.S.C. § 7421(a). The judgment of the district court is affirmed and the appellees request for sanctions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1912 and Rule 38 is granted. In addition to costs, damages in the amount of $2,000 are adjudged against the appellant.

AFFIRMED, SANCTIONS ORDERED.