alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

HAKIM BLATCH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 515 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

HAKIM BLATCH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 516 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3467 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to terminate an exemption 

for companies located in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and any other 

possession of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to terminate 

an exemption for companies located in Puerto Rico, the 

Virgin Islands, and any other possession of the United 

States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S. Territories Inves5 tor Protection Act of 2016’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3467 IS

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF EXEMPTION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6(a) of the Investment 

3 Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–6(a)) is amended 

4 by striking paragraph (1). 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE AND SAFE HARBOR.— 

6 (1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in 

7 paragraph (2), the amendment made by subsection 

8 (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of 

9 this Act. 

10 (2) SAFE HARBOR.—With respect to a company 

11 that is exempt under section 6(a)(1) of the Invest12 ment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–6(a)(1)) 

13 on the day before the date of the enactment of this 

14 Act, the amendment made by subsection (a) shall 

15 take effect on the date that is 3 years after the date 

16 of the enactment of this Act. 

17 (3) EXTENSION OF SAFE HARBOR.—The Secu18 rities and Exchange Commission, by rule and regula19 tion upon its own motion, or by order upon applica20 tion, may conditionally or unconditionally, under sec21 tion 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 

22 (15 U.S.C. 80a–6(c)), further delay the effective 

23 date for a company described in paragraph (2) for 

24 a maximum of 3 years following the initial 3-year 

25 period if, before the end of the initial 3-year period, 

26 the Commission determines that such a rule, regulaVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:48 Oct 06, 2016 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3467.IS S3467

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3467 IS

1 tion, motion, or order is necessary or appropriate in 

2 the public interest and for the protection of inves3 tors. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### MALKIN v. DUBINSKY et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Jan. 8, 1953.

*39George D. Cohen, New York City, for plaintiff.

Morris P. Glushien, New York City, for defendants.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The defendant contends that its answer served on November 17, 1952, was the date of the last pleading. But it appears that on that day the complaint was amended by stipulation. Some confusion seems to have resulted from this situation, and at plaintiff’s request another stipulation was entered into on December 4, 1952, “that the Defendants’ Answer shall he regarded as responsive to the amended Paragraph 12 of Plaintiff’s Complaint.” Within four days thereafter, on December 8th, plaintiff served a demand for a jury trial, which was promptly filed. The defendant now moves to strike the demand, urging that the last day was November 27th under Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

A question does exist as to when the last pleading was served. Even assuming the defendant is correct, the Court, in the exercise of discretion, has the power to relieve the plaintiff of the alleged failure to serve the jury demand within time under Rule 6(b) ; and also under Rule 39(b) to grant a jury trial where not previously demanded. Clearly, this is not a case of inadvertence or oversight. The amendment of the complaint and the resulting stipulations appear to have caused confusion. The plaintiff has made out a case warranting relief under Section 6(b).

The motion is denied.

Settle order on notice.
No. 1000.

#### Indemnity Insurance Company of North America *v.*Smoot.

April 29, 1946.

Petition for writ of *836certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

*Louis M. Denit*for petitioner.

*Stanley H. Kamerow*for respondent.
#### Tambe Electric, Inc., Respondent, v Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Appellant.

[856 NYS2d 373]

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages in the amount of $69,085.58 for defendant’s alleged breach of a contract pursuant to which defendant was to provide copper wire to plaintiff at a price quoted by plaintiff. We note at the outset that, although defendant appeals from an order granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, the order was subsumed in the subsequent judgment. Nevertheless, we exercise our discretion to treat the notice of appeal as valid and deem the appeal as taken from the judgment *(see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy,*140 AD2d 988 [1988]; *see also*CPLR 5520 [c]).

With respect to the merits, we conclude that plaintiff met its burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter *1162of law by establishing that there was a contract between the parties and that defendant breached that contract *(see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). We reject the contention of defendant that it raised a triable issue of fact by presenting evidence of an oral condition precedent requiring payment in full by plaintiff at the time that defendant accepted the price quoted by plaintiff. “[P]arol evidence may be admissible to prove a condition precedent to the legal effectiveness of a written agreement if the condition is not contradictory or at variance with its express terms” *(Bank of Suffolk County v Kite,*49 NY2d 827, 828 [1980]; *see Niskayuna Sq., LLC v 81 & 3 of Watertown, Inc.,*12 AD3d 1160 [2004]; *Tropical Leasing v Fiermonte Chevrolet,*80 AD2d 467, 469 [1981]). Here, the parol evidence is at variance with the written agreement, which expressly gave plaintiff the option of purchasing the goods over time *(see generally Bank of Suffolk County,*49 NY2d at 828). We conclude, however, that the accurate amount of damages sustained by plaintiff is $68,598.46, and we therefore modify the judgment accordingly. Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Gorski, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   July 14, 2005                            Signed:  /s/  Donald M. Boone



Donald M. Boone, President/CEO/Treasurer









Date:   July 14, 2005                            Signed:  /s/  Michael C. Nasser



Michael C. Nasser, Corporate Secretary
Exhibit
23





WEIS
MARKETS, INC.





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We have
issued our report dated March 11, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting
included in the Annual Report of Weis Markets, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 26, 2009.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Weis
Markets, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-99535, effective September 13,
2002).





/S/Grant
Thornton LLP


Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania


March 11,
2010
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 129 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 129

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
     stamp should be issued in commemoration of Diwali, a festival 
                 celebrated by people of Indian origin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2003

 Mr. Pallone submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
     stamp should be issued in commemoration of Diwali, a festival 
                 celebrated by people of Indian origin.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) a postage stamp should be issued by the United States 
        Postal Service in commemoration of Diwali, a festival 
        celebrated by people of Indian origin; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           9,598
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             663
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     20,773
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,943
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,955
<LOANS>                                        137,759
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,454
<DEPOSITS>                                     170,842
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                801
<LONG-TERM>                                        933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 192,454
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,893
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,033
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   141
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,067
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,039
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,191
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,876
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,735
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,735
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        386
<LOANS-PAST>                                        20
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   797
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,098
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       99
<RECOVERIES>                                        24
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,173
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit        32

**Certification        Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the filing of the financial        statements of Ophthalmic Imaging Systems ("Registrant") for the quarter ended September 30,        2007 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge,        that:

1.     The Report        fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange        Act of 1934, as        amended,; and

2.     The        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the        financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date: November 14, 2007

/s/ Gil        Allon                                      Gil Allon        Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Ariel        Shenhar                               Ariel Shenhar        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21.1
                             Greenbriar Corporation
                                  Subsidiaries

American Care Communities, Inc.                   Wedgwood Retirement Inns, Inc.
American Care Communities of Sanford, Inc.        Wedgwood Terrace, Inc.
American Country Time, Inc.                       Windsor House Florence, Inc.
Berne Village, Inc.                               Windsor House Greenville, LLC
Berne Village Retirement, Inc.                    Windsor House West, Inc.
CareAmerica, Inc.
Crown Pointe, Inc.
Crown Pointe Development-Corona, LP
Graybrier, Inc.
Greenbriar Financial Corporation
Greenbriar Management, Inc.
Greenbriar Payroll Company
Harlingen Retirement LC
Hermiston Assisted Living, Inc.
Kellway Corporation
King City Retirement Corporation
Lewiston Group LLC
Liberty Acquired Brain Injury Habilitation Services, Inc.
MRC Assisted Living, Inc.
Neawanna By The Sea Limited Partnership
Oak Harbor Retirement Center, Inc.
Oak Harbor Retirement Center Partners, LP
Paradise-Greenbriar, Inc.
Residential Healthcare Properties, Inc.
Residential Healthcare Properties of Texas, Inc.
Retirement Housing Associates, LP
Rose Garden Estates, Inc.
Rose Garden Estates, LLC
Rose Tara Plantation, Inc.
Rose Terrace of Wendell, Inc.
Roswell Retirement, LP
Roswell Senior Apartments, Ltd. Co.
Senior Living Management, Inc.
SLM-Oak Park, Inc.
Sweetwater Springs Group, LLC
The Briarcliff at Texarkana, Inc.
The Denison-Greenbriar, Inc.
The Greenbriar at Muskogee, Inc.
The Greenbriar at Sherman, Inc.
The Terrace Retirement, Inc.
Transferco, Inc.
Villa Del Rey-Roswell, LP
Villa Del Rey-Seaside, Inc.
Villa Residential Care Homes-Arlington LP
Villa Residential Care Homes-Corpus Christi South LP
Villa Residential Care Homes-Ft. Worth East, LP
Villa Residential Care Homes-Granbury, LP
Villa Residential Care Homes-Oak Park, LP
VLS & Associates, Inc.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

|   | (1)  the                Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,                2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Ex-10.42



 Exhibit 10.42 
 2012 and 2013 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements 
 The
compensation for the executive officers of Cerus Corporation regarding annual base salaries and target bonus percentages were as follows: 
  

																	
	 Name
	  	2012
Annual Base
Salary
(1)	 	  	2012
Targeted Bonus
(as a % of 2011
Annual Base
Salary)	 	 	2013
Annual Base
Salary
(2)	 	  	2013
Targeted Bonus
(as a % of 2012
Annual Base
Salary)	 
	 William M. Greenman

President and Chief Executive Officer 
	  	$	475,000	  	  	 	60	% 	 	$	500,000	  	  	 	60	% 
	 Laurence M. Corash, M.D.

Senior Vice President, Chief Scientific Officer 
	  	$	390,113	  	  	 	35	% 	 	$	399,866	  	  	 	40	% 
	 Howard G. Ervin (3)
 Vice President, Legal Affairs 
	  	$	327,295	  	  	 	35	% 	 	$	65,459	  	  	 	n/a	  
	 Chrystal N. Menard (4)
 Chief Legal Officer
	  	$	280,000	  	  	 	n/a	  	 	$	280,000	  	  	 	35	% 
	 Kevin D. Green

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer(5) 
	  	$	263,780	  	  	 	35	% 	 	$	279,607	  	  	 	35	% 
	 Caspar Hogeboom(6)
 President, Cerus Europe B.V.
	  	$	288,736	  	  	 	35	% 	 	$	303,871	  	  	 	40	% 

  

	(1)	Annual base salary was effective March 1, 2012, except for Ms. Menard, as discussed in footnote 4 below. 


 

	(2)	Annual base salary was effective March 1, 2013. 

  

	(3)	Mr. Ervin retired as the Chief Legal Officer effective December 3, 2012 and converted to part-time status, effective January 1, 2013.


  

	(4)	Ms. Menard’s annual base salary for 2012 was effective December 3, 2012. 


 

	(5)	Mr. Green’s title changed from Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer to Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective February 28,
2013. 

  

	(6)	Mr. Hogeboom’s title changed from General Manager, Cerus Europe to President, Cerus Europe B.V., effective March 1, 2012. Mr. Hogeboom’s 2012
annual base salary of €224,540 has been converted from Euros to United States dollar by applying an average exchange rate of €1 to $1.2859 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Mr. Hogeboom’s 2013 annual base salary of
€230,153 has been converted from Euros to United States dollar using the exchange rate of €1 to $1.312, which was the exchange rate in effect on March 1, 2013.
**REPORT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





To
      the
      Board of Directors and Shareholders of


Wells-Gardner
      Electronics Corporation





The
      audits referred to in our report dated March 13, 2007, included the related
      financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and for
      the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, included in
      Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
      Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
      financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
      statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
      financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
      the information set forth therein.




Blackman
      Kallick Bartelstein, LLP


Chicago,
      Illinois


March 13,
      2007








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
      2-72090, 2-09137, 33-63920, 33-61535, 33-02981, and 333-72629) on Form S-8
      of Wells-Gardner Electronics Corporation of our report dated March 13, 2007,
      with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Wells-Gardner Electronics
      Corporation as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, and the related
      consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for
      the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 and the related financial
      statement schedule, which reports appear in or are incorporated by reference
      in
      this annual report on Form 10-K of Wells-Gardner Electronics
      Corporation.





Blackman
      Kallick Bartelstein, LLP


Chicago,
      Illinois
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                            95,914
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,502,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                    5,069,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,980,092
<PP&E>                                         1,433,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                    59,316
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,705,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,883,206
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                       1,795,157
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,196,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,705,212
<SALES>                                        7,135,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,135,436
<CGS>                                          5,862,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,885,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  72,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                17,794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  177,760
<INCOME-TAX>                                      60,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              221,804
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (44,044)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     117,760
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.11


</TABLE>