alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Cheryl Anne REAGAN, Debtor, Cheryl Anne Reagan, Appellant, v. Frederick S. Wetzel, III, Trustee; 1919 M Street Associates; G. Latt Bachelor, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ronald E. Reagan, Appellees.

No. 09-2255.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 2010.

Filed: March 18, 2010.

*684Cheryl Anne Reagan, pro se.

Frederick S. Wetzel, III, Trustee, Little Rock, AR, pro se.

Charles Turner Coleman, Wright & Lindsey, Little Rock, AR, Phyllis M. Jones, Roger Dale Rowe, Lax *&*Vaughan, Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Cheryl Anne Reagan appeals from the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the order of the bankruptcy court,1 which denied her motion to dismiss the case or remove the trustee, and approved the conversion of her case from a case under Chapter 11 to a case under Chapter 7. We agree with the BAP that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying Reagan’s motions to dismiss the case or to remove the trustee, or in finding that her case should be converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding. *See In re M & S Grading, Inc.,*541 F.3d 859, 867 (8th Cir.2008) (denial of motion to remove trustee is reviewed for abuse of discretion); *In re Hedquist,*450 F.Sd 801, 804 (8th Cir.2006) (bankruptcy court’s decision whether to dismiss Chapter 11 case is reviewed for abuse of discretion); *In re Lumber Exch. Bldg. Ltd. P’ship,*968 F.2d 647, 648 (8th Cir.1992) (bankruptcy court has broad discretion in deciding whether to dismiss or convert Chapter 11 case). Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

*685As to Reagan’s challenge to the bankruptcy court’s order approving the terms of the sale of Federal News Service, Inc. (FNS), which is part of the bankruptcy estate, we conclude that this issue is moot. The bankruptcy court has since rescinded the sale of FNS and instructed the trustee to obtain new bids for the company. Thus, at this time there is no order of sale, and Reagan’s objections to the sale price are no longer relevant. *See PFS Dist. Co. v. Raduechel,*574 F.3d 580, 599-600 (8th Cir.2009) (case is moot when it no longer presents actual, ongoing case or controversy).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Ben T. Barry, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas.
Business Establishments within Katrina-Damaged Areas as Identified by FEMA
Louisiana and Mississippi

*. $F

Mississippi

.

Lake
Pontchartrain

\

A

4
|
Ay
¥

J

y

Business Establishments
© Within Damaged Areas
Within half a mile of Damaged Areas

© Outside of Damaged Areas

se wa Gulf of Mexico
n= z

0 10 20 Miles
[Enno enn)

Louisiana
17% of Louisiana's employment was
within the FEMA Identified Damage Areas

Business Quarterly
Establishments Employees Wages
18,997 316,063 $3,047,142,670

27% was inside or within half a mile of
the FEMA Identified Damage Areas

Business Quarterly
Establishments Employees Wages

31,133 499,650  $4,668,063,720

Mississippi
5% of Mississippi's employment was
within the FEMA Identified Damage Areas

Business Quarterly
Establishments Employees Wages

3,352 55,081 $419,139,867

13% was inside or within half a mile of
the FEMA Identified Damage Areas

Business Quarterly
Establishments Employees Wages

7,718 136,406  $1,082,573,551

Data source:

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW),
developed through a cooperative program between
the states and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

FEMA Imagery Derived Assessment Damage Areas
‘September 6, 2005, www.gismaps.fema.gov

Data notes:
Employment is from December 2004. Quarterly Wages
are the total paid for the Fourth Quarter of 2004.
Data are adjusted to include business establishments
for whom accurate addresses are not available.

Cartography by:
State of Califomia
Employment Development Department
www.labormarketinfo.ca.gov
September 2005
#### Vicenta LOPEZ-BOBADILLA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-72102.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Jan. 3, 2013.

Vicenta Lopez-Bobadilla, Los Angels, CA, pro se.

Edward C. Durant, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Vicenta Lopez-Bobadilla, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for *703review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo claims of due process violations. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Lopez-Bobadilla’s motion to reopen where she failed to establish prejudice arising from any alleged ineffective assistance by her former representatives. *See id.*at 793-94 (“[Prejudice results when the performance of counsel was so inadequate that it *may*have affected the outcome of the proceedings.” (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)).

Lopez-Bobadilla’s due process claims therefore fail. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring error and substantial prejudice to prevail on due process claim).

We reject Lopez-Bobadilla’s remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 134544 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### DOROTHY SIMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 134544 COA: 275454 WCAC: 05-000297 DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 19, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cynosure, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael R. Davin, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                                
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2010 |  | /s/    Michael R.
Davin                        
|                  |  | Michael R. Davin                               
|                  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis H. Bunt,certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Authentidate
Holding Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Intentionally omitted.

4. Intentionally omitted.

5. Intentionally omitted.

Date: December 27, 2005                          Name:  /s/Dennis H. Bunt
                                                        -----------------------
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer
H. Res. 255

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 3, 2003.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 4)

proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States. The joint resolution

shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution

and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the joint

resolution equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary;

(2) an amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by

Representative Conyers of Michigan or his designee, which

shall be considered as read and shall be separately debatable

for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent
2

•HRES 255 EH

and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or

without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-1027V

(Not to be published)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

*

MICHAEL BOYLE, *

*

Petitioner, * Filed: October 3, 2016

*

v. * Decision by Stipulation; Influenza

* Vaccine; Chronic Inflammatory 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP)

HUMAN SERVICES *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

DECISION

HASTINGS, Special Master.

This is an action seeking an award under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation 

Program1on account of an injury suffered by Michael Boyle. On September 29, 2016, counsel 

for both parties filed a Stipulation, stipulating that a decision should be entered granting 

compensation. The parties have stipulated that Petitioner shall receive the following 

compensation:

● A lump sum of $230,000.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner, 

representing compensation for all damages that would be available under 

42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a). 

Under the statute governing the Program, as well as the “Vaccine Rules” adopted by this 

court, the special master must now enter a decision endorsing that stipulation, and the clerk must 

enter judgment, in order to authorize payment of the award. See § 300aa-12(d)(3)(A) and (e)(3); 

§ 300aa-13(a); Vaccine Rules 10(a), 11(a).2

 

1

 The applicable statutory provisions defining the Program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 

et seq. (2012 ed.). Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references will be to 42 U.S.C. (2012

ed.).

2

 The “Vaccine Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims” are found in Appendix B of 

the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims.
I have reviewed the file, and based on that review, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation 

appears to be an appropriate one. Accordingly, my decision is that a Program award shall be 

made to Petitioner in the amount set forth above. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for 

review of this Decision, the clerk shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George L. Hastings, Jr. 

George L. Hastings, Jr.

Special Master
HOLLYER BRADY BARRETT & HINES LLP
                                551 Fifth Avenue
                               New York, NY 10176

                               Tel: (212) 818-1110
                               FAX: (212) 818-0494




                                 April 27, 2006






To the Trustees of The Churchill Tax-Free Fund of Kentucky

     We consent to the incorporation by reference into post-effective amendment
No. 27 under the 1933 Act and No. 28 under the 1940 Act of our opinion dated
April 28, 1998.


                          Hollyer Brady Barrett & Hines LLP



                            /s/ William L. D. Barrett
                          by---------------------------
                                     Partner
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          47,340
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               1
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                18,926
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     87,505
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         226,948
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           220,695
<LOANS>                                      2,428,981
<ALLOWANCE>                                     24,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,832,161
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,844,621
<SHORT-TERM>                                   429,365
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             20,500
<LONG-TERM>                                    313,596
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,983
<OTHER-SE>                                     165,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,832,161
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                131,266
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               18,275
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   513
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               150,054
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              60,422
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,537
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           62,517
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,156
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (8)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 47,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,493
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      23,493
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,311
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.52
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,337
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,346
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,324
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,163
<RECOVERIES>                                       206
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               24,523
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            24,523
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          8,224


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         21,324
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,872
<PP&E>                                         57,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (29,203)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 56,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,110
<BONDS>                                        12,306
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          2,198
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       268,727
<OTHER-SE>                                     (232,828)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   56,061
<SALES>                                        2,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,000
<CGS>                                          (5,579)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (5,579)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,192)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (429)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,299)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,299)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,299)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.25)




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 155 (Monday, August 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 37900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17081]



[[Page 37900]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. TA-201-75]


Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells (Whether or Not Partially 
or Fully Assembled Into Other Products) Determination Not To Close Any 
Portion of the Commission's Hearing on Injury Issues

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Commission determination not to close any part of the hearing 
on injury issues in the above-captioned investigation to the public.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission has determined to deny a request to conduct a 
portion of its hearing on injury issues scheduled for August 15, 2017 
in camera.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Jane Alves, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202-708-2969. 
Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this 
matter may be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 
202-205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 4, 2017, the Solar Energy 
Industries Association and its member company SunPower Inc. 
(collectively SEIA) requested in the above-captioned investigation that 
the Commission conduct in camera a portion of its hearing on injury 
issues scheduled for August 15, 2017. The Commission believes it should 
conduct its business in public in all but the most unusual 
circumstances. The Commission has determined that, in light of the 
nature of this investigation and the ample opportunity given parties to 
present written arguments, including those relying on confidential 
information, it will be able to assess adequately all arguments raised 
by SEIA without resorting to the extraordinary measure of an in camera 
hearing. Accordingly, the Commission has determined that the public 
interest would be best served by a hearing that is entirely open to the 
public. See 19 CFR 201.36(c)(1).

    Authority: This notice is provided pursuant to 19 CFR 201.35(b).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 9, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-17081 Filed 8-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
----

| (1)    |   | Fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934;                                                         |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
| (2)    |   | That      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                           |   |   |   |                                                             |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Date:      March 10, 2010 |   | By:    |   | /s/      ANTHONY SPIER                                      |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   | Anthony      Spier                                               |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   | Chairman,      President &                                   |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   | Chief      Executive Officer                                     |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |                                                             |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |                                                             |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |                                                             |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |                                                             |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |                                                             |   |   |
| Date:      March 10, 2010 |   | By:    |   | /s/      JAMES F. BRACE                                          |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |                                                             |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   | James      F. Brace                                              |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   | Executive      Vice President                                    |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   | &      Chief Financial Officer,Secretary      &Treasurer |   |   |

----