alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                           Exhibit 11.1
                                           
                                           
                                NATURAL WONDERS, INC.
                          COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE NET LOSS
                        (In thousands, except per share data)
                                           
                                           
                                           
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      
                                  Quarter Ended                Six Months Ended
                          ------------------------------  ------------------------------
                          August 2, 1997  August 3, 1996  August 2, 1997  August 3, 1996
                          --------------  --------------  --------------  --------------
<S>                        <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>
Net loss                     $(2,327)        $(1,285)        $(4,426)        $(3,497)
                             -------         -------         -------         -------
                             -------         -------         -------         -------
Weighted average common 
    shares outstanding         7,993           7,810           7,990           7,801

Per share net loss           $ (0.29)        $ (0.16)        $ (0.55)        $ (0.45)
                             -------         -------         -------         -------
                             -------         -------         -------         -------
</TABLE>



                                        
There is no material difference in the number of shares used in computing per
share amounts as calculated for primary and fully diluted earnings per share.
##### 



Exhibit 23.0 The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Wells-Gardner Electronics Corporation: The audits referred to in our report dated January 28, 2005, except for the third paragraph of Note
11 as to which the date is March 18, 2005, included the related financial statement schedule as of
December 31, 2004, and 2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, included in Form
10-K. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits.
In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein. We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 2-72090, 2-09137,
33-63920, 33-61535, 33-02981, and 333-72629) on Form S-8 of Wells-Gardner Electronics Corporation
of our report dated January 28, 2005, except for the third paragraph of Note 11 as to which the
date is March 18, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Wells-Gardner
Electronics Corporation as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, and 2003
and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in or are incorporated by
reference in this annual report on Form 10-K of Wells-Gardner Electronics Corporation. Our reports refer to the reclassification of receivables and payables from the joint venture and
affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2003. Our reports refer to the adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, on January 1, 2002. Blackman Kallick Bartelstein, LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 2005
Exhibit 32.1








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William H. Armstrong III, as Chairman of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 16, 2011








/s/ William H. Armstrong III


William H. Armstrong III


Chairman of the Board,


President & Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000592 28-JAN-2019 03:34 PM
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 138

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that small business 

concerns should continue to play an active role in assisting the United 

States military, Federal intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and 

State and local police forces by designing and developing innovative 

products to combat terrorism, and that Federal, State, and local governments should aggressively seek out and purchase innovative technologies 

and services from small business concerns to improve homeland defense 

and aid in the fight against terrorism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2003

Mr. WYNN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

small business concerns should continue to play an active 

role in assisting the United States military, Federal intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and State and 

local police forces by designing and developing innovative 

products to combat terrorism, and that Federal, State, 

and local governments should aggressively seek out and 

purchase innovative technologies and services from small 

business concerns to improve homeland defense and aid 

in the fight against terrorism.
2

•HRES 138 IH 

Whereas in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks perpetrated 

against the United States on September 11, 2001, the 

Pentagon’s Technical Support Working Group, which is 

responsible for seeking new technologies to assist the 

military, requested that the people of the United States 

submit ideas regarding innovative methods to better fight 

terrorism; 

Whereas during the first 2 months after such request, more 

than 12,500 ideas were submitted to the Technical Support Working Group, most of them from small business 

concerns; 

Whereas small business concerns remain the most innovative 

sector of the United States economy, accounting for the 

vast majority of new product ideas and technological innovations; 

Whereas the participation of small business concerns in the 

Federal procurement process is vital to the defense of the 

United States; and 

Whereas despite their achievements, small business concerns 

often have difficulty marketing and supplying goods and 

services to Federal, State, and local governments: Now, 

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) small business concerns should continue to 

4 play an active role in assisting the United States 

5 military, Federal intelligence and law enforcement 

6 agencies, and State and local police forces by design-
3

•HRES 138 IH 

1 ing and developing innovative products to combat 

2 terrorism; and 

3 (2) Federal, State, and local governments 

4 should aggressively seek out and purchase innovative 

5 technologies and services from, and promote re6 search opportunities for, small business concerns to 

7 improve homeland defense and aid in the fight 

8 against terrorism.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3409 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3409

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include foster care 
  transition youth as members of a targeted group for purposes of the 
                        work opportunity credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2016

 Mr. Casey (for himself and Mr. Cardin) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include foster care 
  transition youth as members of a targeted group for purposes of the 
                        work opportunity credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improved Employment Outcomes for 
Foster Youth Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF FOSTER CARE TRANSITION YOUTH FOR PURPOSES OF WORK 
              OPPORTUNITY CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of 
subparagraph (I), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (J) 
and inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(K) a qualified foster care transition youth.''.
    (b) Qualified Foster Care Transition Youth.--Subsection (d) of 
section 51 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at 
the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(16) Qualified foster care transition youth.--The term 
        `qualified foster care transition youth' means any individual 
        who is certified by the designated local agency as--
                    ``(A) not having attained age 27 as of the hiring 
                date, and
                    ``(B) having been in foster care (as such term is 
                used in section 477 of the Social Security Act) at any 
                time after the individual attained the younger of--
                            ``(i) age 16, or
                            ``(ii) the age specified in subsection 
                        (a)(7) of such section.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to individuals who begin work for the employer after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 19

Designating the room numbered H–236 in the House of Representatives 

wing of the Capitol as the ‘‘Richard K. Armey Room’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. NUSSLE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION

Designating the room numbered H–236 in the House of 

Representatives wing of the Capitol as the ‘‘Richard K. 

Armey Room’’.

Whereas, at the end of the 107th Congress, Representative 

Richard K. Armey retired after 18 years of distinguished 

service in the House of Representatives, including service 

as the Majority Leader for 8 years, the longest tenure of 

any Republican Majority Leader in 92 years: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the room numbered H–236 in the 

2 House of Representatives wing of the Capitol shall be 

3 known and designated as the ‘‘Richard K. Armey Room’’.

Æ
I 

l ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

DynCorp International LLC ) 

) 

Under Contract No. FA8617-12-C-6208 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61735 

Gregory S. Jacobs, Esq. 

Erin L. Felix, Esq. 

Polsinelli PC 

Washington, DC 

Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. 

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney 

Col C. Taylor Smith, USAF 

Jason R. Smith, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE THRASHER 

By motion dated September 28, 2018, the government moves to dismiss the appeal as 

moot since the contracting officer rescinded its final decision dated May 11, 2018. The 

government states it "is no longer asserting the claim from which ASBCA No. 6173 5 

arises." By letter dated October 3, 2018, appellant stated it does not object to the 

government's motion to dismiss. When a contracting officer rescinds a government claim 

and the final decision asserting that claim, the voluntary action moots the appeal, leaving the 

Board without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal any further. URS Federal Support 

Services, Inc., ASBCA No. 60364, 17-1BCA136,587. Accordingly, the appeal is 

dismissed as moot. 

Dated: October 9, 2018 

(Signatures continued) 

:Administrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I 

l 

' 

·l 

i 

i 

I 

1 

• 

j 

1 

\ 

i 

! 

•\ 

1 

• . 4 

~ 

I 

I concur 

J. REitTPROUTY 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

Ci.u' {P~iCRAIG sf CLARKE 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61735, Appeal of DynCorp 

International LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
OMB APPROVAL
OMB Number: 3235-0070
Expires: March 31, 2006
Estimated average burden
No. 1157.

#### Stafford *v.*Ragen, Warden.

May 13, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois, denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            1117
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3540
<ALLOWANCES>                                       298
<INVENTORY>                                       8930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 14024
<PP&E>                                            9371
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   16570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3811
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4053
<OTHER-SE>                                        5580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     16570
<SALES>                                          28301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 28301
<CGS>                                            25958
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    29080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1059)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1059)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1059)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of CareScience, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Palek, Controller and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



|/s/KURT PALEK                                      |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Kurt Palek
Controller and Treasurer
March 28, 2003 |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CareScience, Inc. and will be retained by CareScience, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
1

The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1299

___________

John E. Searcy, III, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Charles E. Clawson, Jr., individually *

and in his official capacity as Judge of * [UNPUBLISHED]

the Chancery Court of Van Buren *

County, Arkansas, Third Division, *

Twentieth Judicial District, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: June 11, 2003

 Filed: July 2, 2003

___________

Before BOWMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

John E. Searcy, III, appeals the District Court’s1

 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action against Judge Charles E. Clawson, Jr., of the Chancery Court of Van

Buren County, Arkansas, who presided over a quiet-title action involving property
2

See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476

(1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 416 (1923). 

-2-

the Internal Revenue Service had seized from Searcy. Having carefully reviewed the

record, we affirm. See Lemonds v. St. Louis County, 222 F.3d 488, 492 (8th Cir.

2000) (noting court reviews questions regarding subject matter jurisdiction de novo),

cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1183 (2001).

We agree with the District Court that Searcy’s claims are barred by the RookerFeldman doctrine.2

 Searcy’s due process claims would have required the District

Court to determine the propriety of Judge Clawson’s rulings on jurisdiction,

evidentiary issues, and the merits of the quiet-title action. See Ballinger v. Culotta,

322 F.3d 546, 548 (8th Cir. 2003) (noting with the exception of habeas corpus

petitions, lower federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over challenges to state

court judgments; jurisdictional bar applies to straightforward appeals as well as to

"indirect attempts by federal plaintiffs to undermine state court decisions"). Further,

this court has previously rejected the void-judgment argument Searcy urges on

appeal. See Snider v. City of Excelsior Springs, Mo., 154 F.3d 809, 812 (8th Cir.

1998) (noting that under Rooker-Feldman rule, "no federal district court has

jurisdiction to decide that the state court judgment was void"). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
December 20, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FLORENTINO ROBERT ENGLISH, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00420-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and 

having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment 

requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable 

of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is REFORMED, to read as 

follows: we reform the judgment of the trial court to reflect the administrative fees 

assessed in the amount of $882. 

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
No. 99-50191 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50191 Summary Calendar

RAMON RICARTE, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-98-CV-43

- - - - - - - - - - May 19, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Ramon Ricarte was granted a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the issues whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) improperly circumscribes federal habeas review of state court fact findings and conclusions of law and whether prosecution witness Fred Zain was a member of the prosecution team for purposes of imputing knowledge of Zain’s alleged perjury to the prosecution. The motion by amicus curiae for leave to file out of time motion toNo. 99-50191 -2- file amicus curiae brief is DENIED. Appellee’s motion to strike amicus curiae’s motion to file out of time motion to file amicus brief is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY. We have previously held that the AEDPA’s standards of review are not unconstitutional. See Hughes v. Johnson , 191 F.3d 607, 612 (5th Cir. 1999); Corwin v. Johnson , 150 F.3d 467, 471-72 (5th Cir. 1998). We need not reach the issue whether Zain is a member of the prosecution team given the district court’s ruling that Ricarte had failed to show that Zain’s conclusion was factually inaccurate and that Zain’s testimony was material to the outcome and given that Ricarte has not obtained a COA to appeal these issues. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court denying Ricarte’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is AFFIRMED.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                              293,861
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,785,526
<ALLOWANCES>                      1,260,000
<INVENTORY>                          66,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    840,423
<PP&E>                            9,374,111
<DEPRECIATION>                    4,833,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   10,853,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             2,010,700
<COMMON>                            401,201
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     10,853,142
<SALES>                           8,660,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  8,660,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     9,325,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        -0-
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  711,339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     707,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 707,864
<NET-INCOME>                       (545,043)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.05)
23.1
               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



We have issued our report dated March 26, 1999,  accompanying  the  consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Greenbriar  Corporation on
Form  10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  1998.  We hereby  consent  to the
incorporation  by reference  of said report in the  Registration  Statements  of
Greenbriar  Corporation on Form S-3 (File No.  33-64840) and Form S-8 (File Nos.
33-65856 and 33-33985).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 14, 1999