alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 300

Recognizing the outstanding contributions of the faculty, staff, students, and 

alumni of Christian colleges and universities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2003

Mr. HOEKSTRA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the outstanding contributions of the faculty, 

staff, students, and alumni of Christian colleges and 

universities.

Whereas the United States has benefited greatly from over 

1,000 Christian colleges, beginning with the Nation’s 

first Christian college in 1636; 

Whereas 900 such campuses continue to self-identify themselves as religious institutions, adding to the rich diversity of higher education in the Nation; 

Whereas more than 125 Christian colleges today make their 

distinction the intentional relationship of scholarship and 

service to biblical truth as members or affiliates of the 

Council for Christian Colleges & Universities, working 

collaboratively through more than 100 Council programs 

and services; 
2

•HRES 300 IH 

Whereas the Council’s member institutions, located in 30 

States and representing more than 30 religious traditions, have experienced enrollment growth during the last 

decade that was 8 times the average growth in all of 

higher education to where more than 200,000 students 

and 15,000 faculty comprise these institutions today; 

Whereas 80 percent of Council students participate in experiential learning and 99 percent participate in some form 

of service and learning through extracurricular activities; 

Whereas in a national survey of Council member campus 

alumni, 95 percent reported that their college education 

helped them develop moral principles that guide their actions, 90 percent said their college helped them develop 

a sense of purpose in life, and that Council alumni place 

a high priority on community service, helping the disadvantaged and strongly agreed that their college life 

prepared them to achieve success while engaging Christian principles; 

Whereas the Nation benefits for generations from those who 

choose intentionally Christ-centered higher education 

campuses to prepare themselves for every field including 

science, business, education, government, medicine, the 

arts, and in volunteer community service; and 

Whereas the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities 

recognizes the month of October as Christian Higher 

Education Month: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes the university campuses affiliated 

3 with the Council for Christian Colleges & Univer4 sities, and other faith-based campuses; and 
3

•HRES 300 IH 

1 (2) supports the goals and ideas of Christian 

2 Higher Education Month.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We have issued our report dated March 30, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of WHX Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of WHX Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-3 (File No. 333-158769, effective June 29, 2009) and on  Form S-8 (File No. 333-144148, effective June 28, 2007).









/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Edison, New Jersey
May 19 , 2016

JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THE PENN INSURANCE A ND ANNUITY COMPANY, AND THE PENN

MUTUAL LIFE INSURANC E COMPANY , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 14

- 00986

- CV V.

CHAD KURIGER , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee Chad Kuriger, signed November 18, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find as a matter of law that there was no breach of contract committed by appe llants The Penn Insurance and Annuity Company and The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company

. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and RENDER judgment that appellee Chad Kuriger take nothing on his claims

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee Chad Kuriger

. We further order this decision certified below f or observance.
#### Eric D. Baglin, Appellant, v Paul W. Crego, Jr., as Executor of Gerald L. Crego, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

[852 NYS2d 918]

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the *1190decision at Supreme Court. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Smith, Centra, Lunn and Fahey, JJ.
SATURNA INVESTMENT TRUST


                     POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned  Trustees of Saturna Investment Trust, a Massachusetts  Business
Trust  organized  under the laws of the State of  Washington,  proposing to file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended,  one or more amendments to the Registration  Statement on Form N-1A and
related  Amendments  to the  Registration  Statement  of  the  Trust  under  the
Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Amendments") do hereby separately and severally
appoint and constitute Nicholas F. Kaiser, whose signature appears below:

                  /S/ Nicholas F. Kaiser
                  ---------------------------------
                     NICHOLAS F. KAISER

his true and lawful attorney for him and in his name, place and stead to sign in
the  capacity  of a  Trustee  of the  Trust  such  Amendments  and  any  and all
additional  amendments thereto,  and to file such amendments and all instruments
necessary or  incidental  thereto with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission
under such 1933 and 1940 Acts.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has hereunto set his hand and seal this 19
   th day of March, 1997.
---------           -----

/S/ Gary A Goldfogel                    /S/ John E. Love
--------------------                    ---------------
Gary A. Goldfogel                       John E. Love

/s/ John S. Moore
--------------------
John S. Moore
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Todd A. Ferguson, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[852 NYS2d 887]

*1280Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
#### Security Mortgage Group LLC, Respondent-Appellant, v Oak Hill Family Park, LLC, Appellant, and Robert Cassidy, Respondent.

[854 NYS2d 606]

*1303Memorandum: Plaintiff, a mortgage broker, commenced this action seeking a brokerage commission pursuant to the terms of the mortgage loan application of defendant Oak Hill Family Park, LLC (Oak Hill). Supreme Court granted that part of defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against defendant Robert Cassidy but denied that part of the motion for summary judgment with respect to Oak Hill. We conclude that Oak Hill also was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it, and we therefore modify the amended order accordingly.

“[A] mortgage broker earns a commission when it obtains a commitment letter from a lender which meets all the terms and conditions of the loan which the borrower stipulated to in the agreement with the broker” *(Multiloan Mtge. Co. v Asian Gardens,*303 AD2d 658, 660 [2003]). Here, there was no agreement between the parties setting forth the terms and conditions of the loan that would have to be met in order for plaintiff to receive its commission. In addition, the loan application stated that the interest rate of the loan would not be determined until two days before the closing, and thus it is unclear on the record before us whether the lender was in fact a willing lender *(see generally Ro-Stan Equities v Schechter,*44 AD2d 577 [1974]). In any event, we note that Cassidy, on behalf of Oak Hill, made a number of handwritten modifications to the loan application, *1304thus indicating that the loan proposal procured by plaintiff was not equivalent to the loan sought by Oak Hill and that, as a consequence, plaintiff would not have been the procuring cause of the loan that Oak Hill might have received *(see Omni Funding Corp. v Minskoff,*281 AD2d 288 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 716 [2001]). Thus, plaintiffs right to a commission never accrued *(see id.; see generally Howard Taylor & Co. v Terra Capital Assoc.,*292 AD2d 836 [2002]). Present—Martoche, J.P., Smith, Peradotto, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7239
TIMOTHY SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HOUSTON SHIFLETT, Support Unit Manager; JOHN/JANE DOE, Records Office Manager; J. K. VAUGHAN, SR., Hearing Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-02-549) Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 21, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Smith, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. SeeSmith v. Shiflett , CA-02- 549 (E.D. Va. July 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                        
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated April 15, 1999 appearing on page F-2 on this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, into the Registration Statements on Form S-8
relating to the stock incentive plans of The Wiser Oil Company (Nos. 33-44171,
33-62441, 33-44172, 333-22525 and 333-15083).



/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Arthur Andersen LLP

Dallas, Texas,
April 15, 1999
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, the undersigned officer of WEST PENN POWER
COMPANY (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/ Jeffrey D. Serkes
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Jeffrey D. Serkes
September 24, 2003                           Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Annual Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, based on my knowledge, the information contained in this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

| |  |       |  |                                                                                            
| |  | ----- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |       |  | /s/ROBERT L. HOWARD-ANDERSONRobert L. Howard-Anderson President and Chief
Executive Officer
| |  | Date: |  | March 10, 2008                                                                             

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Occam Networks, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
#### Alexander A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROSPERITY MORTGAGE CORP.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.S.; Wells Fargo Home Mortgage; John S. Burson, Substitute Trustee; William M. Sav*199age, Substitute Trustee; Gregory N. Britto, Substitute Trustee; Jason Murphy, Substitute Trustee; Kristine D. Brown, Substitute Trustee; Erik W. Yoder, Substitute Trustee, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-2324.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 21, 2012.

Decided: Jan. 4, 2013.

Gerald Solomon, Solomon & Bascietto, LLC, Boynton Beach, Florida, for Appellant. Amy S. Owen, Richard D. Holzheimer, Jr., Cochran *&*Owen, LLC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander A. Johnson appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint in which he sought a judgment quieting title to real property, a declaratory judgment, and an accounting. The district court determined that Johnson’s complaint failed to state a claim for relief. We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Johnson v. Prosperity Mortg. Corp.,*No. 8:ll-cv-02532-AW, 2011 WL 5513231 (D.Md. Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 11


                       SYNAPTIC PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

                    Computation of Primary Net Loss Per Share


                                   Three Months               Nine Months
                               Ended September 30,        Ended September 30,
                                1997         1996          1997         1996
                             ----------   ----------    ----------   ----------
Weighted average common
  shares outstanding          7,648,249    7,608,049     7,643,081    7,559,352

Shares underlying common
  stock options outstanding
  considered exercised,
  based on the treasury
  stock method                       --      285,473            --           --

Shares underlying 1993
  Warrants outstanding
  considered exercised,
  based on the treasury
  stock method                       --       18,539            --           --
                             ----------   ----------    ----------   ----------
                              7,648,249    7,912,061     7,643,081    7,559,352
                             ==========   ==========    ==========   ==========

Net loss                    ($1,634,000)    $729,000  ($3,729,000) ($1,430,000)
                             ==========   ==========    ==========   ==========

Net loss per share               $(0.21)       $0.09       $(0.49)      ($0.19)
                                   ====         ====         ====        =====
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 11


                       SYNAPTIC PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

                 Computation of Fully Diluted Net Loss Per Share


                                Three Months                  Nine Months
                               Ended September 30,        Ended September 30,
                                1997         1996          1997         1996
                             ----------   ----------    ----------   ----------

Weighted average common
  shares outstanding          7,648,249    7,608,049     7,643,081    7,559,352

Shares underlying common
  stock options outstanding
  considered exercised,
  based on the treasury
  stock method                  285,643      288,183       285,642      302,975

Shares underlying 1993
  Warrants outstanding
  considered exercised,
  based on the treasury
  stock method                   46,359       23,792        43,163       59,344
                             ----------   ----------    ----------   ----------
Shares used in computation
  of net loss per share       7,980,251    7,920,024     7,971,886    7,921,671
                             ==========   ==========    ==========   ==========

Net loss                    ($1,634,000)    $729,000   ($3,729,000) ($1,430,000)
                             ==========   ==========    ==========   ==========

Net loss per share              ($0.20)        $0.09        ($0.47)      ($0.18)
                                 =====         =====         =====        =====
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
| SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT                           |
|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 | State or |   |
| Entity Name                                          | Country | % Owned |
|                                                 |   |   |
| Crown Pointe, Inc.                                   | California | 100% |
| Mesquite, LLC                                        | Nevada | 60% |
| Retirement Real Estate, Inc.                         | Nevada | 100% |
| Senior Living Management Payroll Company             | Texas | 100% |
| Villa Residential Care Homes – Arlington I, LP | Texas | 49% |
| Wedgwood Terrace, Inc.                               | Nevada | 100% |
| Windsor House Greenville, LLC                        | South Carolina | 100% |
| Mockingbird Energy, Inc.                             | Nevada | 100% |
| Mountaineer State Energy, LLC                        | Nevada | 100% |
| Mountaineer State Operations, LLC                    | Nevada | 100% |
pprg8k031209ex10-1.htm


    
      

      

    

    
       

      
        	
                Exhibit
      10.1

              	
                Press
      Release

              


      

       

       

      March 12,
2009

       

      Patient
Portal Technologies, Inc. Restructures Debt

      Baldwinsville, NY, March 12, 2009
- Patient Portal Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: PPRG) (Patient Portal)
announced today that it had executed a term sheet with Dutchess Private Equity
Fund to restructure 100% of its debt, retire all of the Dutchess outstanding
warrants and release Dutchess’ collateral lien in the Company’s
assets.

      


      In return
for restructuring its long term debt, retiring its warrants and releasing its
collateral Dutchess will receive up to $500,000 of cash at closing, be issued
$7.5 million of convertible Preferred Stock and 4% of the Company’s outstanding
common stock. The Preferred Stock will have an annual 8% Payment In Kind feature
and be convertible at Dutchess’ option into 35% of the Company’s common stock.
The Company will have the right to redeem up $1 million of the Preferred Stock
prior to conversion. A definitive agreement is anticipated to be finalized
within the next few weeks.

      


      Company
CEO Kevin Kelly commented, “We are pleased to have Dutchess as a partner working
with us to support our growth plans. Their confidence in our business is
underscored by their financial commitment and willingness to work with the
Company to insure we can capitalize on the opportunities in the marketplace.” He
also added, “This restructuring will allow the Company to better direct its
resources to support growth while enabling us to strengthen and expand our
current banking relationships.”

      


      Patient
Portal Technologies, Inc. assists hospitals in increasing financial performance
by providing services that improve and enhance the patients experience before,
during and after their hospital stay. These services are delivered over the
company’s proprietary platform. The company provides its products and solutions
to hospitals and healthcare facilities throughout the entire United
States

      


      To view
the website and obtain Company information go to http://www.patientportal.com.

      


      Patient
Portal Investor Relations Contact:

                Vanessa
Loysen

                (315)638-6708
EX 10.3 Q113




Exhibit 10.3


Amendment Agreement 



This Amendment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made as of December 28, 2012 and further amends the letter agreement dated July 2, 2010, as amended (the “Letter Agreement”), between you and IHS Inc. (the “Company”), containing the terms and conditions of your employment with the Company.  
The parties agree to amend the provisions of the Letter Agreement as follows:
		
	1.
	The phrase “prior to or concurrently with the provision of such payment or benefit” at the end of the first sentence of Section 9 of the Letter Agreement (Release) beginning with “Other than if your employment terminates” is hereby deleted and replaces in its entirety with the following:




“within 60 days of the date of your separation from service.”
 
		
	2.
	The following sentence is added to Section 9 of the Letter Agreement (Release) following the first sentence beginning with “Other than if your employment terminates” and before the sentence beginning with “The payments or benefits you are eligible to receive”:




“If you execute such a release within such 60 day period, the payments under Section 7(a)(i) and (ii) or under Section 8(a)(i) or (ii), as applicable, will be made or begin, as applicable, within the 60 day period from the date of your separation from service, following the execution of such release; provided that any payments under this Letter Agreement that could be paid or would become payable during a period that begins in one taxable year and ends in the subsequent taxable year shall be paid in the subsequent taxable year.”


		
	3.
	Except as expressly amended herein, the Letter Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


	
		
	 
	IHS Inc.
         
   /s/ Jeffrey Sisson
By:  _______________________
Jeffrey Sisson
Senior Vice President
Chief Human Resources Officer

	Agreed and Accepted:


/s/ Daniel Yergin
____________________________
Employee Name:  Daniel Yergin