alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 318 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 84

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 318

                          [Report No. 108-208]

       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
   Representative from the Sixth Congressional District of Tennessee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2003

   Mr. Ney (for the Committee on House Administration) reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
   Representative from the Sixth Congressional District of Tennessee.

    Resolved, That the election contest relating to the office of 
Representative from the Sixth Congressional District of Tennessee is 
dismissed.

                                                  House Calendar No. 84

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 318

                          [Report No. 108-208]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
   Representative from the Sixth Congressional District of Tennessee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 15, 2003

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3386 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to designate May 1 as ‘‘Silver 

Star Service Banner Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mrs. MCCASKILL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to designate May 

1 as ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Silver Star Service 

5 Banner Day Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) Congress has always honored the sacrifices 

9 made by the wounded and ill members of the Armed 

10 Forces. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3386 IS

1 (2) The Silver Star Service Banner has come to 

2 represent the members of the Armed Forces and vet3 erans who were wounded or became ill in combat in 

4 the wars fought by the United States. 

5 (3) The Silver Star Families of America was 

6 formed to help the people of the United States re7 member the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill 

8 members of the Armed Forces by designing and 

9 manufacturing Silver Star Service Banners and Sil10 ver Star Flags for that purpose. 

11 (4) The sole mission of the Silver Star Families 

12 of America is to evoke memories of the sacrifices of 

13 members of the Armed Forces and veterans on be14 half of the United States through the presence of a 

15 Silver Star Service Banner in a window or a Silver 

16 Star Flag flying. 

17 (5) The sacrifices of members of the Armed 

18 Forces and veterans on behalf of the United States 

19 should never be forgotten. 

20 (6) May 1 is an appropriate date to designate 

21 as ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’. 

22 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

23 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 36, United 

24 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol25 lowing: 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3386 IS

1 ‘‘§ 145. Silver Star Service Banner Day 

2 ‘‘(a) DESIGNATION.—May 1 is Silver Star Service 

3 Banner Day. 

4 ‘‘(b) PROCLAMATION.—The President is requested to 

5 issue each year a proclamation calling on the people of 

6 the United States to observe Silver Star Service Banner 

7 Day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activi8 ties.’’. 

9 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

10 The table of sections for chapter 1 of title 36, United 

11 States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relat12 ing to section 144 the following: 

‘‘145. Silver Star Service Banner Day.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-77-2017]

                    The City of Phoenix, Arizona, grantee of FTZ 75, submitted an application, docketed on May 16, 2017, requesting expanded subzone status for the facilities of Conair Corporation (Conair), Subzone 75A, located in Glendale, Arizona (82 FR 25239, June 1, 2017). The City of Phoenix subsequently requested and obtained approval for the expanded subzone status for Conair under the alternative site framework. As a result, the City of Phoenix has withdrawn the initial application requesting expanded subzone status. For further information, contact Christopher Kemp at                     *Christopher.Kemp@trade.gov*                     or (202) 482-0862.                

Dated: August 11, 2017.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-17363 Filed 8-16-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P3510-DS-P
**EXHIBIT 32(ii)**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 ofChapter 63**
**of Title 18 of the United States Code**
I, Reuben Gamoran, the Chief Financial Officer ofWm. Wrigley Jr. Company (the “Company”), certify that to the best of my knowledge:   (i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K dated February 11, 2005 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (ii) the information contained in the said Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.    /s/ REUBEN GAMORAN Reuben Gamoran Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dated the 11th****day of February,2005
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3475 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3475

  To delay the amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 
                               Procedure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2016

 Mr. Coons (for himself, Mr. Daines, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Lee, Mr. Franken, 
  Ms. Baldwin, and Mr. Paul) introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To delay the amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 
                               Procedure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Review the Rule Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the order entered by the Supreme 
Court of the United States on April 28, 2016--
            (1) effective on the date of enactment of this Act, rule 41 
        of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is amended to read 
        as it read on November 17, 2016; and
            (2) the proposed amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules 
        of Criminal Procedure set forth in such order shall take effect 
        on July 1, 2017.
    (b) Applicability.--Notwithstanding the amendment made by 
subsection (a)(1), for any warrant issued under rule 41 of the Federal 
Rules of Criminal Procedure during the period beginning on December 1, 
2016, and ending on the date of enactment of this Act, such rule 41, as 
was in effect on the date on which the warrant was issued, shall apply 
with respect to the warrant.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 350 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     September 3, 2003.
Whereas Lance Armstrong won the 2003 Tour de France, the 100th anniversary of 
        the race, by completing the 2,125-mile, 23-day course in 83 hours, 41 
        minutes, and 12 seconds, finishing 1 minute and 1 second ahead of his 
        nearest competitor;
Whereas Lance Armstrong's win on July 27, 2003, marks his fifth Tour de France 
        victory;
Whereas with this victory, Lance Armstrong joined Miguel Indurain as the only 
        riders in history to win cycling's most prestigious race in 5 
        consecutive years;
Whereas Lance Armstrong displayed incredible perseverance, determination, and 
        leadership in prevailing over the mountainous terrain of the Alps and 
        Pyrenees and in overcoming crashes, illness, hard-charging rivals, and 
        driving rain on the way to winning the premier cycling event in the 
        world;
Whereas in 1997, Lance Armstrong defeated choriocarcinoma, an aggressive form of 
        testicular cancer that had spread throughout his abdomen, lungs, and 
        brain, and after treatment has remained cancer-free for the past 6 
        years;
Whereas Lance Armstrong is the first cancer survivor to win the Tour de France;
Whereas Lance Armstrong's courage and resolution to overcome cancer has made him 
        a role model to cancer patients and their loved ones, and his efforts 
        through the Lance Armstrong Foundation have helped to advance cancer 
        research, diagnosis, and treatment, and after-treatment services;
Whereas Lance Armstrong continues to be the face of cycling as a sport, a 
        healthy fitness activity, and a pollution-free transportation 
        alternative; and
Whereas Lance Armstrong's accomplishments as an athlete, teammate, cancer 
        survivor, and advocate have made him an inspiration to millions of 
        people around the world: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Lance Armstrong and the United States Postal 
        Service team on their historic victory in the 2003 Tour de France; and
            (2) commends the unwavering commitment to cancer awareness and 
        survivorship demonstrated by Lance Armstrong.
    Sec. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall transmit an enrolled 
copy of this resolution to Lance Armstrong.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 22

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF WELLINGTON HALL, LIMITED

       Name of Subsidiary                    Jurisdiction of Incorporation


1.   Wellington Hall Caribbean                 Corporation North Carolina

2.   Muebles Wellington Hall, S.A.             Honduras, Central America


               Both of the above-listed subsidiaries do business
                       under their full corporate names.


                             OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

                                    OFFICERS


Hoyt M. Hackney, Jr.                             Ralph L. Eskelson, Jr.
President and Treasurer                          General Manager
                                                 Muebles Wellington Hall, S.A.

Ernst B. Kemm                                    William W. Woodruff
Executive Vice President                         Secretary


                                    DIRECTORS

Donald W. Leonard                                 William W. Woodruff
Chairman of the Board                             President of Woodruff
                                                  Shoe Store

Hoyt M. Hackney, Jr.                              Ernst B. Kemm
President and Treasurer                           Executive Vice President

Arthur F, Bingham
Senior Executive Vice President


                                 TRANSFER AGENT

                  Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company
<PAGE>

Exhibit 12


                         Western Investment Real Estate Trust
                  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                Year ended December 31,
                                                                                -----------------------
                                                              1998          1997          1996          1995         1994
                                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Net Income                                               $  13,616     $  12,880     $  12,231     $  10,304     $  15,266
Fixed charges - interest and amortization of loan fees      13,414        11,511        11,289        11,537        10,063
                                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings before interest and amortization of loan fees   $  27,030     $  24,391     $  23,520     $  21,841     $  25,329
                                                         ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
Fixed charges - interest capitalized                     $     275     $      12     $     126     $      29     $       -
                                                         ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
Total fixed charges                                      $  13,689     $  11,523     $  11,417     $  11,566     $  10,063
                                                         ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                            1.97          2.12          2.06          1.89          2.52
                                                         ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
</TABLE>


                                                             66
**ICIM Services***Partners in Risk Management*

 

December 1, 2010

 

Mr. Scott Stroh  Legal Counsel  Saturna Capital Corporation  1300 N. State Street  Bellingham, WA 98225

**RE: ICI Mutual Investment Company Blanket Bond No. 89265110B ("Bond")****D&O/E&O Liability Insurance Policy No. 89265110D ("Policy")**

Dear Mr Stroh:

As discussed, I am hereby confirming that the share of total premium for Blanket  Bond and D&O/E&O coverage allocated to each Investment Company Insured  is less than the premium such company would have to pay if it had purchased  separate policies from ICI Mutual, as explained in our other letter dated today.

Further, we estimate that Amana Mutual Funds Trust would pay approximately  $72,000 for a Policy with a limit of $3,000,000 while Saturna Investment Trust  would pay approximately $23,500 for a Bond with a limit of $1,000,000.

Further, we estimate that the Amana Mutual Funds Trust would pay approximately  $71,000 for a Policy with a limit of $3,000,000 while the Saturna Investment  Trust would pay approximately $25,000 for a Policy with a limit of $1,000,000.  Lastly, Saturna Capital Corp. would pay approximately $33,000 for a $1,000,000  Policy.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 202/326-5479.

Regards,

/s/Maggie Sullivan  Senior Underwriter

 

 

 

*1401 H Street, NW • Washington, DC  2005 • 800.643.4246 • Fax: 202.682.2425*
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00218-CR

ROXAN MARTINEZ A/K/A ROXANNE MARTINEZ A/K/A

ROXAN MARTINEZ ABREGO

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR15003836-F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 25, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-25-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-24-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,269
<SECURITIES>                                    37,989
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,278
<PP&E>                                          25,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,776)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,307
<BONDS>                                          6,712
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       140,308
<OTHER-SE>                                    (83,538)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,789
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,892
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,152)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,152)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,152)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 28, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20991

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS ANTONIO MONTES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CR-199

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luis Antonio Montes appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea to illegal reentry. He argues that the district

court’s 15-month upward departure was plainly unreasonable. We

need not decide whether Montes’ sentence was a Guidelines or nonGuidelines sentence because, in either case, his sentence was not

plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Jones, 444 F.3d 430,

441 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2958 (2006). 

If the district court imposed a Guidelines sentence, the

nature of Montes’ prior offense and the six-month period within
No. 05-20991

-2-

which he reoffended after deportation were factors present to an

exceptional degree warranting a departure, even if the period

within which he reoffended had already been taken into

consideration when calculating his criminal history score. See

United States v. Saldana, 427 F.3d 298, 309-10 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 126 S. Ct. 810 (2005). If the district court instead

imposed a non-Guidelines sentence, it used the advisory guideline

range as a reference, and it’s reasons for the departure were

fact specific and consistent with the directives of 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 3553(a)(1), (2)(A) that in determining the sentence to impose,

the court “consider . . . the nature and circumstances of the

offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant” and

“promote respect for the law.” See United States v. Smith, 440

F.3d 704, 707 (5th Cir. 2006). Consequently, the decision to

upwardly depart from the advisory range was not plain error under

either scenario.

Montes’ reliance on United States v. Lambert, 984 F.2d 658

(5th Cir. 1993) (en banc), for the proposition that the extent of

the departure was plainly unreasonable is unpersuasive. The

record does not support a determination that the district court

upwardly departed pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, and Lambert is

therefore inapposite. Finally, we reject Montes’ contention that

the district court’s written reasons for the departure were

insufficient. By specifying that Montes returned to the United
No. 05-20991

-3-

States illegally within six months of being deported, the court

adequately complied with 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2). 

AFFIRMED.
NO. 12-19-00242-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

LEONARD DAWAYNE JONES, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 349TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Leonard Dawayne Jones filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by 

Appellant and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, 

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered July 10, 2019.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 10, 2019

NO. 12-19-00242-CR

LEONARD DAWAYNE JONES,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 349th District Court 

of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 349CR-17-33099)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.