alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3485 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3485

  To delay the amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 
                               Procedure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 30, 2016

     Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mr. Paul, Mr. Coons, and Ms. Baldwin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To delay the amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 
                               Procedure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stalling Mass Damaging Hacking Act 
of 2016''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the order entered by the Supreme 
Court of the United States on April 28, 2016--
            (1) effective on the date of enactment of this Act, rule 41 
        of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is amended to read 
        as it read on November 17, 2016; and
            (2) the proposed amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules 
        of Criminal Procedure set forth in such order shall take effect 
        on April 1, 2017.
    (b) Applicability.--Notwithstanding the amendment made by 
subsection (a)(1), for any warrant issued under rule 41 of the Federal 
Rules of Criminal Procedure during the period beginning on December 1, 
2016, and ending on the date of enactment of this Act, such rule 41, as 
was in effect on the date on which the warrant was issued, shall apply 
with respect to the warrant.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranskaryoticTherapies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Gregory D. Perry, Vice President, Finance, and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |            | /s/ Gregory D. Perry    |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------------|
| Dated: | August 12, 2003 | Gregory D. Perry        |   |
|   |            | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc. and will beretained by Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit
32.2
 
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Xedar Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies,
to such officer’s knowledge, that:
  (i) the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 March 27,
2008                                                                
By:    /s/ Steven M. Bragg
 
 Steven
M. Bragg
 Chief
Financial Officer
 Xedar
Corporation
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 4 , 2022

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00032

- CR

ANDRE JOSEPH WASHING TON , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas Tr i al Court Cause No. 1676526

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant entered a guilty plea to possession with intent to deliver a
controlled substance

. T he trial court assessed punishment at confinement for twenty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas De p artment of Criminal Justice. We dismiss the appeal.

I n exchange for appellant’s waiver of his right to appeal, the State consented to appellant’s waiver of his right to jury trial. It has been held that such a waiver is
valid if there was consideration. S ee Jones v. State , 488 S.W.3d 801, 807

– 08 (Tex.2

Crim. App. 2016); Ex parte Broadway , 301 S.W.3d 694, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009).

T he trial court signed a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bar g ain case, and the defend ant waived the right of appeal

. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports
th e trial court’s certification. See Dears v. Sta t e , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). On August 25, 2022 , this court notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. No response has been received.

W e d ismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
No. 1033.

#### Gillespie *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

May 6, 1946.

*Harold E. Rorschach*and *Jack L. Rorschach*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General McGrath, Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch*and *Hilbert P. Zarky*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of WJ Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael R. Farese, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written certification required by Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

|/s/MICHAEL R. FARESE, PHD.Michael R. Farese, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
March 27, 2004 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit
      32.2







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Xedar Corporation (the “ *Company* ”)
      hereby
      certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




(i) the
      accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2006 (the “ *Report* ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
      as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and




(ii) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/
                Steven M. BraggMarch
                14, 2007
            
            Steven
                M. BraggChief
                Financial OfficerXedar
                Corporation
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     The undersigned executive officer of Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc. (the “Registrant”)hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Registrant.                                                   /s/ Douglas J. Timmerman   Douglas J. Timmerman, Chairman of the Board, President   and Chief Executive Officer   August 3, 2007**Note:**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc. and will be retainedby Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 190 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                            April 11 (legislative day, April 10), 2003.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the 
legislative day of April 10, 2003, providing for consideration or disposition of 
a conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 95) 
establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for 
fiscal year 2004 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 
2003 and 2005 through 2013.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00035-CV

Casey A. Koehler and Jennifer Phy, as Administratrix of the Estate of

Evelyn Landua Koehler, Appellants

v.

Kanda Koehler, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 29,462, HONORABLE EDWARD S. JOHNSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

On March 24, 2016, this Court abated this appeal for a period of 90 days pending

the consummation of a formal settlement agreement. The parties have filed an agreed, joint

motion to extend the time period of abatement an additional 30 days to effectuate the settlement

agreement between the parties. We grant the motion and extend the abatement period for an

additional 30 days. The parties shall submit a joint status report or a motion to dismiss on or

before July 25, 2016.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Abated

Filed: June 22, 2016
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Wilshire Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Francis J.
Elenio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C Section 78(a) or 78o(d);
and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of
the Company.





Dated:
March 31, 2009




By:
                    /s/
      Francis J. ElenioFrancis
      J. ElenioChief
      Financial
Officer
STATSURE DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Leo Ehrlich, Chief Financial Officer of StatSure Diagnostic Systems, Inc.,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

      (1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,
            Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
            Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
            complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
            applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form
            10-KSB of StatSure Diagnostic Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended
            September 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
            financial condition and results of operations of StatSure Diagnostic
            Systems, Inc.

Dated: November 27, 2006

                                       /s/ Leo Ehrlich
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Leo Ehrlich
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       (principal financial officer
                                       and duly authorized officer)
#### In the Matter of: Hunsdon Cary STEWART, Debtor. Hunsdon Cary Stewart, Appellant, v. Roya Batmanghelich, Appellee.

No. 08-60012.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 16, 2010.*

Filed April 1, 2010.

In the Matter of Hunsdon Cary Stewart, Lompoc, CA, pro se.

Hunsdon Cary Stewart, pro se.

Keith A. Bregman, Esquire, Law Offices of Keith A. Bregman, N. Hollywood, CA, for Appellee.

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Chapter 13 debtor Hunsdon Cary Stewart appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision denying Stewart’s objection to a proof of claim filed by his former wife, Roya Batmanghelich. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review independently the bankruptcy court’s rulings on appeal from *683the BAP. *Diamant v. Kasparian (In re S. Cal. Plastics, Inc.),*165 F.3d 1243, 1245 (9th Cir.1999). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not err when it denied Stewart’s objections to Bat-manghelich’s proof of claim because Stewart failed to come forward with evidence that rebutted the proof of claim’s prima facie validity. *See id.*at 1248 (stating that “debtor must come forward with evidence to rebut the presumption of validity” of a proof of claim).

Stewart’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3461 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3461

 To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to refund or credit 
            certain excess payments made to the Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2016

   Mr. Kirk introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to refund or credit 
            certain excess payments made to the Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securities and Exchange Commission 
Overpayment Credit Act''.

SEC. 2. REFUNDING OR CREDITING OVERPAYMENT OF SECTION 31 FEES.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``Commission'' means the Securities and 
        Exchange Commission;
            (2) the term ``national securities association'' means an 
        association that is registered under section 15A of the 
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o-3); and
            (3) the term ``national securities exchange'' means an 
        exchange that is registered as a national securities exchange 
        under section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 
        U.S.C. 78f).
    (b) Credit for Overpayment of Fees.--Notwithstanding section 31(j) 
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78ee(j)), and subject 
to subsection (c) of this section, if a national securities exchange or 
a national securities association has paid fees and assessments to the 
Commission in an amount that is more than the amount that the exchange 
or association was required to pay under section 31 of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78ee) and, not later than 10 years 
after the date of such payment, the exchange or association informs the 
Commission about the payment of such excess amount, the Commission 
shall offset future fees and assessments due by that exchange or 
association in an amount that is equal to the difference between the 
amount that the exchange or association paid and the amount that the 
exchange or association was required to pay under such section 31.
    (c) Applicability.--Subsection (b) shall apply only to fees and 
assessments that a national securities exchange or a national 
securities association was required to pay to the Commission before the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
      financial statements included in EnviroSource's Form 10-K for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety
      by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
                                    
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               9,678
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       32,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,220
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    95,978
<PP&E>                                             270,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                     128,392
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     459,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              104,740
<BONDS>                                            268,424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             2,018
<OTHER-SE>                                          37,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       459,909
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   212,789
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      166,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  28,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (7,956)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (3,266)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (4,690)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         399
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                        (4,291)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.11)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         214,572
<SECURITIES>                                   177,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,564
<INVENTORY>                                    256,108
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               843,172
<PP&E>                                         988,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                 468,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,520,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          218,626
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,496
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,141,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,520,855
<SALES>                                      2,004,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,023,355
<CGS>                                          837,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,582,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                440,879
<INCOME-TAX>                                   136,378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            304,501
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   304,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.63
        

</TABLE>
Written Description of Oral Agreement - Pypo Beijing and Beijing East Chuangzhi



 Exhibit 10.60 
 Written description of oral agreement between Beijing Pypo Technology Group Company 
 Limited and
Beijing East Chuangzhi Technology Development Co., Ltd. 
 From April 2005 to March 2006, Beijing Pypo Technology Group Company Limited,
or Pypo Beijing, made cash advances of $3.7 million to Beijing East Chuangzhi Technology Development Co., Ltd., a company controlled by Mr. Kuo Zhang. These advances were unsecured, interest-free obligations payable on demand. Pypo Beijing made
these advances to meet the short-term working capital requirements of Beijing East Chuangzhi Technology Development Co., Ltd., which repaid such advances in November 2006.