alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Penions Partners 1991-C, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,530
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  67,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               69,218
<PP&E>                                         4,231,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,828,963)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,471,698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,852
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,465,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,471,698
<SALES>                                        229,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               230,197
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,944<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                84,250
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            84,250
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   84,250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Authentidate Holding Corp. (the company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, being, Surendra Pai, Chief Executive Officer of the company, and William A. Marshall, Chief Financial Officer of the company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 6, 2007 |  |  |  |                        
|                        |  | 
|/s/ Surendra Pai        |  |  |  | /s/ William A. Marshall
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 24(b)(4)


                              THE AAL MUTUAL FUNDS
                         The AAL Balanced Fund Specimen
                          (Specimen stock certificate)
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


   The subsidiaries of the Company at September 27, 1997 were:



    Name of Subsidiary                              State or Other Jurisdiction
                                                             in Which Organized

    AI/FOCS, Inc.                                            State of  Delaware
    Aero-Motive Company                                       State of Michigan
    Aero-Motive (U.K.) Limited                                   United Kingdom
      Woodhead France S.A.R.L.                                           France
      Elitec S.A.                                                        France
    Central Rubber Company                                    State of Illinois
    Daniel Woodhead Company                                   State of Delaware
    H. F. Vogel GmbH Electrotechnische Fabrik                           Germany
    Woodhead Asia Pte. Ltd.                                           Singapore
    Woodhead Canada Ltd.                                    Province of Ontario
    Woodhead de Mexico S.A. de C.V.                                      Mexico
    Woodhead Industries (The Netherlands) B.V.                  The Netherlands
      Akapp Electro Industrie B.V.                              The Netherlands
    Woodhead Japan Corporation                                            Japan
    W.I.S. Corp.                                            U.S. Virgin Islands






















                                       31

<PAGE>
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06

- 14

- 00075

- CV

Billy Lee Copeland

v.

Ashley Nicole Moreland

(No. 1964 IN COUNTY COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FE E

SUPREME COURT CHAPTE R 51 FEE

INDIGENT

MOTION FEE

CLERK'S RECORD $100.00
$20.00 $50.00
$25.00 $10.00
$25.00 PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

E

- PAID

PAID THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, PC

THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, PC
THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, PC
THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, PC

RUBY BOLTON

RUBY K. BOLTON

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of

the COURT OF APPEALS for the Sixth District of Texas, this April 30, 2015

.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___

________________________ Deputy
No. 1302.

#### Louisiana ex rel. Francis *v.*Resweber, Sheriff, et al.

June 10, 1946.

*Robert E. Kline, Jr.*for petitioner.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana granted.
[No. 23959-4-III.

Division Three.

December 6, 2005.]

#### Julie Garibay, *Individually, as Guardian ad Litem, and as Personal Representative,*et al., *Appellants,*v. The State of Washington, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grant County, No. 01-2-01314-5, Evan E. Sperline, J., entered June 1, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kato, C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Brown, JJ. Now published at 131 Wn. App. 454.
ex10_26.htm


    
      

    


    Exhibit
10.26


    2009
Executive Officer
Compensation

     

    On February
19, 2009, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (the
“Company”) approved annual compensation arrangements, for the year beginning
January 1, 2009, for the Company’s Named Executive Officers, as defined in Item
402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. The Company’s executive officers for fiscal 2009, each of whom will
also be identified as a Named Executive Officer in the Company’s 2009 Proxy
Statement, are as follows:

     

    
      	
              
                Name

              

            	 
      	
              
                Title/Position

              

            
	
              Donald
      E. Brown, M.D.

            	 
      	
              Chairman
      of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

              (Principal
      Executive Officer)

               

            
	
              Stephen
      R. Head

            	 
      	
              Chief
      Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Administration,
      

              Secretary
      and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

               

            
	
              Gary
      R. Blough

            	 
      	
              Executive
      Vice President of Worldwide Sales

            
	
               

              Pamela
      J. Hynes

            	 
      	
              Vice
      President of Customer Services

            
	
               

              Joseph
      A. Staples

            	 
      	
              Senior
      Vice President of Worldwide
Marketing

            


    

     

    The
information regarding the annual base salaries and performance bonuses for
the Company’s Named Executive Officers, appearing in the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed February
25, 2009, is incorporated herein by
reference.

     

    2009
Board of Director Compensation

     

    The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company did not modify
the annual compensation arrangements from 2008, for the period beginning January
1, 2009, for the Company’s non-employee Board of Director
members.  The information regarding the annual cash retainers, board
and committee attendance fees and stock options for the Company’s non-employee
Board of Director members, appearing in Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, is incorporated herein
by reference.
<PAGE>


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


From time to time, the Company may publish forward-looking
statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial
performance, business prospects and operations, capital
expenditures, technological developments, new products, research
and development activities and similar matters.  The Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for
forward-looking statements.  In order to comply with the terms of
the safe harbor, the Company notes that a variety of important
factors could cause the Company's actual results and experience to
differ materially from the anticipated results or other
expectations expressed in the Company's forward-looking statements.
The important factors that may affect the operations, performance,
development and results of the Company's business include the
following:

-	In those markets where the Company maintains market
leadership, it will most likely retain preferred retail space
allocation which enhance results.

-	Availability, pricing and sourcing of raw materials has been
relatively stable and a competitive advantage but failure to
maintain these could negatively impact results.

-	The Company has historically been successful marketing to
different segments of the population.  Failure to adequately
anticipate and react to changing demographics and product
preferences could negatively impact results.

-	Both manufacturing and sales of a significant portion of the
Company's products are outside the United States and could be
negatively impacted by volatile foreign currencies and
markets.

-	The Company competes worldwide with other well established
manufacturers of chewing gum.  The Company's results may be
negatively impacted by a failure of new or existing products
to be favorably received, by ineffective advertising, or by
failure to sufficiently counter aggressive competitive
actions.

-	Underutilization of or inadequate manufacturing capacity due
to unanticipated movements in consumer demands could
materially affect manufacturing efficiencies and costs.

-	Discounting and other competitive actions may make it more
difficult for the Company to maintain its historically strong
operating margins.

-	Governmental regulations with respect to import duties,
tariffs and environmental controls, both in and outside the
U.S., could negatively impact the Company's costs and ability
to compete in domestic or foreign markets.

-	The Company has not had any material labor stoppages,
nevertheless, such disputes or strikes could negatively affect
shipments from suppliers or shipment of finished product.

-	The failure of basic infrastructure (i.e., utilities) could
negatively impact the ability of the Company's factories to
continue operating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          93,570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,301,340
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,394,910
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,394,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          368,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,026,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,394,910
<SALES>                                            569
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   569
<CGS>                                          (1,400)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (1,400)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,969
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,969
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
###                                          THRIVENT MUTUAL FUNDS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,308,565
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  332,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,420
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,675,691
<PP&E>                                       2,313,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                 538,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,440,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          228,119
<BONDS>                                      2,883,595
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,121,523
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           530
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,440,010
<SALES>                                         38,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               261,694
<CGS>                                           26,689
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,682
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                724,776
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,423
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            701,353
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   701,353
<EPS-BASIC>                                      13.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.02


</TABLE>
H. Res. 177 

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 23, 2003. 

Whereas on December 27, 2002, the Republic of Kenya successfully held presidential, parliamentary, and local elections; 

Whereas these elections were widely praised by objective 

international observers as free and fair; 

Whereas the Department of State stated that with these elections the Kenyan people ‘‘have made a strong demonstration of their democratic commitment and established an 

important example for the region and for the world’’; 

Whereas the European Union stated that ‘‘the overall conduct of the elections constitutes an example for other 

countries in the region’’; 

Whereas these elections signal a major step forward for Kenyan democracy, particularly when compared with other 

elections held in Kenya since it became an independent 

state in 1963; 

Whereas the transition of power put in motion by these elections culminated on December 30, 2002, when former 

President Daniel Toroitich arap Moi peaceably transferred the Kenyan presidency to President Mwai Kibaki; 

and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 177 EH 

Whereas these elections and the subsequent transfer of power 

from leader to leader represent the birth of a successful 

new democracy in Kenya: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) commends the people of the Republic of Kenya 

for conducting free and fair elections, and the Government of Kenya for its successful completion of a peaceful 

and orderly transition of power; 

(2) expresses its desire to see this new democracy 

in Kenya continue to thrive, as it has in the months following the 2002 elections; 

(3) urges other African countries to look to Kenya 

as an example of a working democracy in action and to 

follow the example set by the people of Kenya during 

this recent election process; 

(4) reaffirms the friendship that exists between the 

people of the United States and people of Kenya, as two 

nations bound together by the shared values of democracy; 

(5) offers its commitment to working to ensure democracy is able to grow and flourish as Kenya moves 

into the challenging future that lies ahead; and 

(6) commends the Government of Kenya for its 

commitment and concrete steps taken— 

(A) to strengthen democracy, human rights 

and the rule of law; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with BILLS

3 

•HRES 177 EH 

(B) to combat corruption; 

(C) to provide free and universal primary education; 

(D) to fight against HIV/AIDS; and 

(E) to support the United States in the war on 

terrorism. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment
Number 2 to Registration Statement Number 2-74481 on Form S-8 dated January
28, 1983, as amended and supplemented to date, Post-Effective Amendment Number
3 to Registration Statement Number 2-74481 on Form S-8 dated October 10, 1983,
Post-Effective Amendment Number 1 to Registration Statement Number 2-97149 on
Form S-8 dated September 30, 1985, Post Effective Amendment Number 3 to
Registration Statement Number 2-76480 on Form S-8 dated April 22, 1985, Post-
Effective Amendment Number 2 to Registration Statement Number 2-70806 on Form
S-8 dated May 20, 1981, Post-Effective Amendment Numbers 2, 1-A and 1-B to
Registration Statement Number 33-04320 on Form S-4 dated March 26, 1986, as
supplemented and amended to date, Post-Effective Amendment Numbers 2-A and 2-B
to Registration Statement Number 33-04320 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 dated June
1, 1987, Registration Statement Numbers 33-35762 and 33-35763 on Form S-8
dated July 6, 1990, Registration Statement Number 33-52295 on Form S-8 dated
February 16, 1994, Registration Statement Number 33-58323 on Form S-8 dated
March 31, 1995, and Registration Statement Number 333-03753 on Form S-3 dated
May 15, 1996, as amended to date, of our report dated December 12, 1997, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Whittaker Corporation
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31,
1997. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts"
in the aforementioned Registration Statements insofar as that reference
relates to our report for the year ended October 31, 1996.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
January 28, 1998
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 02-50638

Summary Calendar

____________________

TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellee

v.

URBAN ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC; ET AL

Defendants

URBAN ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC;

Defendant - Appellant

OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY

Defendant - Counter Claimant - Appellant

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

C.A. No. A 01-CA-319-SS

_________________________________________________________________

January 15, 2003

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
2

Urban Electrical Services, Inc. (“Urban”) and Old Republic

Insurance Company (“ORIC”), appeal the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to Twin City Insurance Company (“Twin City”) and

the denial of their summary judgment motion. On appeal, Urban

and ORIC raise the same substantive arguments that they

articulated before the district court, namely (1) that the 1995

Contractor’s Proposal and specifically, its indemnifications

provisions, do not apply to the Sundance Project; and (2) that

the indemnification provisions are unenforceable under the Texas

“fair notice” standard because they fail both the conspicuousness

requirement and the express negligence rule. 

For the reasons provided by the district court, the grant of

Twin City’s summary judgment motion and the denial of Urban and

ORIC’s summary judgment motion were both appropriate. Because

the 1995 Contractor’s Proposal does indeed apply to the Sundance

Project and the indemnification provisions are sufficiently

enforceable under Texas law, it is unnecessary to evaluate Urban

and ORIC’s third issue for appeal, i.e., whether the district

court erred in failing to award to ORIC all or a portion of its

overpayment in the wrongful death settlement. 

AFFIRMED.