Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 16, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 38825 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. If you 

believe this rule has implications for 

federalism or Indian tribes, please 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 

above. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such expenditure, we 

do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves a 

special local regulation that will 

prohibit non-participant persons and 

vessels from entering, transiting 

through, anchoring in, or remaining 

within a limited race area and will also 

prohibit persons and vessels from 

transiting at more than wake speed 

within a limited spectator area during a 

two day race event lasting nine hours 

daily. This rule is categorically 

excluded from further review under 

paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2–1 of the 

Commandant Instruction. A Record of 

Environmental Consideration (REC) 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this rule. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 100 as follows: 

PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON 

NAVIGABLE WATERS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 100 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233. 

■ 2. Add a temporary § 100.T07–0556 to 

read as follows: 

§ 100.T07–0556 Special Local Regulations; 

Islamorada Grand Prix of the Seas; 

Islamorada, FL 

(a) Location. The following regulated 

areas are established as a special local 

regulation. All coordinates are North 

American Datum 1983. 

(1) Race Area and Buffer Zone. All 

waters in the vicinity of Islamorada, FL 

encompassed within an imaginary line 

connecting the following points: 

Starting at Point 1 in position 24°56.300′ 

N., 080°34.750′ W.; thence west to Point 

2 in position 24°55.750′ N., 080°35.570′ 

W.; thence south to Point 3 in position 

24°55.153′ N., 080°35.306′ W.; thence 

east to Point 4 in position 24°55.643′ N., 

080°34.464′ W.; thence north back to the 

point of origin in position 24°56.300′ N., 

080°34.750′ W. 

(2) Spectator Area. All waters in the 

vicinity of Islamorada excluding the 

regulated area, encompassed within an 

imaginary line connecting the following 

points: Starting at Point 1 in position 

24°56.17′ N., 080°35.08′ W.; thence west 

to Point 2 in position 24°56.02′ N., 

080°35.30′ W.; thence south to Point 3 

in position 24°55.96′ N., 080°35.26′ W.; 

thence east to Point 4 in position 

24°56.11′ N., 080°35.04′ W.; thence 

north back to the point of origin in 

position 24°56.17′ N., 080°35.08′ W. 

(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated 

representative’’ means Coast Guard 

Patrol Commanders, including Coast 

Guard coxswains, petty officers, and 

other officers operating Coast Guard 

vessels, and Federal, State, and local 

officers designated by or assisting the 

Captain of the Port Key West in the 

enforcement of the regulated areas. 

(c) Regulations. (1) All nonparticipant persons and vessels are 

prohibited from entering, transiting 

through, anchoring in, or remaining 

within the race area and buffer zone 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port Key West or a designated 

representative. 

(2) All persons and vessels are 

prohibited from transiting in excess of 

wake speed in the spectator area, unless 

authorized by the Captain of the Port 

Key West or a designated representative. 

(3) Persons and vessels desiring to 

enter, transit through, anchor in, remain 

within or transit in excess of wake 

speed within any of the regulated areas 

may contact the Captain of the Port Key 

West by telephone at (305) 292–8772, or 

a designated representative via VHF–FM 

radio on channel 16 to request 

authorization. If authorization is 

granted, all persons and vessels 

receiving such authorization must 

comply with the instructions of the 

Captain of the Port Key West or a 

designated representative. 

(4) The Coast Guard will provide 

notice of the regulated areas by Local 

Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, or by on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Enforcement Period. This rule will 

be enforced daily from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

on August 19, 2017 through August 20, 

2017. 

Dated: August 10, 2017. 

J.A. Janszen, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Key West. 

[FR Doc. 2017–17238 Filed 8–15–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2017–0388; FRL–9966–22– 

Region 4] 

Air Plan Approval; SC: Standards for 

Volatile Organic Compounds and 

Oxides of Nitrogen 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve changes to the South 


pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
38826 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 16, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 

1Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 5, Section II, 

Part A is approved into the SIP, last revised May 

7, 2002 (67 FR 30594). However, the entry for ‘‘Part 

A’’ at 40 CFR 52.2120(c) was inadvertently removed 

from the table of SIP-approved regulations. In this 

action, EPA is adding that entry back into the table. 

2Seitz, John S. ‘‘Calculating Potential to Emit 

(PTE) for Emergency Generators.’’ Memorandum to 

Program Directors in EPA Regional Offices. Office 

of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research 

Triangle Park, NC. September 6, 1995. 

Carolina State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) that revise several miscellaneous 

rules for control standards for process 

industries. Specifically, changes are 

made to standards for volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs) and oxides of 

nitrogen (NOX). EPA is approving 

portions of SIP revisions submitted by 

the State of South Carolina, through the 

South Carolina Department of Health 

and Environmental Control (SC DHEC), 

on the following dates: October 1, 2007, 

June 17, 2013, and January 20, 2016. 

These actions are being taken pursuant 

to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

October 16, 2017 without further notice, 

unless EPA receives adverse comment 

by September 15, 2017. If EPA receives 

such comments, it will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register and inform the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2017–0388 at https://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

EPA may publish any comment received 

to its public docket. Do not submit 

electronically any information you 

consider to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, 

etc.) must be accompanied by a written 

comment. The written comment is 

considered the official comment and 

should include discussion of all points 

you wish to make. EPA will generally 

not consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. 

Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management 

Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Akers 

can be reached via telephone at (404) 

562–9089 or via electronic mail at 

akers.brad@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. What action is EPA taking? 

On October 1, 2007, June 17, 2013, 

and January 20, 2016, SC DHEC 

submitted SIP revisions to EPA for 

approval to make administrative and 

clarifying amendments and correct 

typographical errors. These SIP 

submittals make changes to several air 

quality rules in the South Carolina Code 

of Regulations Annotated (S.C. Code 

Ann. Regs.). The changes EPA is 

approving into the SIP in this action 

modify portions of Regulation 61–62.5— 

‘‘Air Pollution Control Standards’’ at 

Standard No. 5—‘‘Volatile Organic 

Compounds,’’ and Regulation 61–62.5, 

Standard No. 5.2—‘‘Control of Oxides of 

Nitrogen (NOX).’’ 

At this time, EPA is not acting on 

changes in the October 1, 2007, 

submittal to Regulation 61–62.1, Section 

II—‘‘Permit Requirements’’ or 

Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 4— 

‘‘Emissions from Process Industries.’’ 

EPA is also not acting on the changes 

included in the June 17, 2013, submittal 

to the following regulations: Regulation 

61–62.1, Section I—‘‘Definitions’’; 

Regulation 61–62.1, Section II—‘‘Permit 

Requirements’’; Regulation 61–62.1, 

Section IV—‘‘Source Tests’’; Regulation 

61–62.3—‘‘Air Pollution Episodes’’; or 

Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 4— 

‘‘Emissions from Process Industries.’’ 

Finally, EPA is not acting on the 

changes included in the January 20, 

2016, submittal to the following 

regulations: Regulation 61–62.1, Section 

II, ‘‘Permit Requirements’’; Regulation 

61–62.5, Standard No. 7.1— 

‘‘Nonattainment New Source Review’’; 

or Regulation 61–62.6—‘‘Control of 

Fugitive Particulate Matter.’’ 

II. Analysis of South Carolina’s 

Submittals 

A. Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 5— 

‘‘Volatile Organic Compounds’’ 

South Carolina is amending its 

standards for controlling VOCs at 

Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 5— 

‘‘Volatile Organic Compounds.’’ The 

June 17, 2013, submittal revises the 

VOC regulation to make several 

administrative edits only, including 

formatting for consistency and 

correcting typographical errors in 

Section I, Part A and Part G and Section 

II, Part Q.1 The January 20, 2016, 

submittal also revises the VOC 

regulation to make further 

administrative edits only, including 

formatting for consistency in Section II, 

Part A and Part B. EPA has reviewed the 

changes made to South Carolina’s VOC 

regulation and is approving them into 

the SIP pursuant to CAA section 110. 

B. Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 

5.2—‘‘Control of Oxides of Nitrogen 

(NOX)’’ 

South Carolina is amending its 

standards for controlling NOX at 

Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 5.2— 

‘‘Control of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX).’’ 

The October 1, 2007, submittal makes 

the following changes to the NOX

regulation at Section I—‘‘Applicability,’’ 

and Section III—‘‘Standard 

Requirements for New Sources’’: (1) 

Clarifies applicability at paragraph I.a. 

by adding the state effective date of the 

regulation; (2) modifies the number of 

hours of operation for testing and 

maintenance for exempted emergency 

generators at subparagraph I.b.2.; (3) 

clarifies the exemption of combustion 

control devices at subparagraph I.b.4.; 

and (4) adds clarifying language to 

Section III at Table 1, ‘‘NOX Control 

Standards.’’ 

CAA section 110(l) provides that EPA 

shall not approve a revision to a plan if 

the revision would interfere with any 

applicable requirement concerning 

attainment and reasonable further 

progress (as defined in CAA section 

171), or any other applicable 

requirement of the CAA. Subparagraph 

I.B.2. extends the testing and 

maintenance operation threshold for 

exempted emergency generators from 

250 hours to 500 hours per year. SC 

DHEC submitted supplemental 

information in support of its earlier SIP 

revision submittal in a December 20, 

2016, letter to EPA. SC DHEC notes in 

its letter that it considered CAA section 

110(l) in making this change and asserts 

that the State expects no increase in 

actual emissions as a result of raising 

this exemption threshold. SC DHEC 

explains that the 500 hours per year 

threshold is commonly used to 

determine the potential to emit for title 

V and other major source applicability 

determinations, consistent with EPA 

guidance.2 These sources are still 

restricted to use in emergency 

conditions. Additionally, SC DHEC 

points to applicable federal 

requirements for emergency generators 

at 40 CFR 63, subpart ZZZZ and 40 CFR 

60 at subparts IIII and JJJJ, which restrict 

non-emergency use of these sources to 

100 hours per year. SC DHEC also 


pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 16, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 38827 

3 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). 

clarifies that peak shaving and other 

types of activities are not considered 

emergency activities, and so would not 

qualify for the exemption under 

paragraph II.B. Therefore, this change to 

subparagraph I.b.2. is not expected to 

result in any increase in emissions that 

would affect the State’s ability to attain 

or maintain state or Federal standards or 

reasonable further progress. 

The change at subparagraph I.b.4. 

clarifies the exemption for devices 

functioning solely as combustion 

control devices. The additional language 

specifies that these devices are not 

automatically excluded from the 

exemption if waste heat is recovered 

from them. This additional language is 

aimed at encouraging process efficiency 

and will not interfere with attainment or 

maintenance of any Federal or state 

standard or reasonable further progress. 

EPA has reviewed the October 1, 

2007, SIP submittal, and is approving 

the aforementioned changes to 

Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 5.2, 

pursuant to CAA section 110(a)(2)(A) 

and 110(l). 

III. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation 

by reference of South Carolina 

Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 5— 

‘‘Volatile Organic Compounds,’’ 

effective November 27, 2015, which 

makes ministerial changes for 

consistency and Regulation 61–62.5, 

Standard No. 5.2—‘‘Control of Oxides of 

Nitrogen (NOX),’’ effective May 25, 

2007, which makes ministerial changes 

for consistency and modifies 

applicability for NOX control. Therefore, 

these materials have been approved by 

EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been 

incorporated by reference by EPA into 

that plan, are fully federally-enforceable 

under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA 

as of the effective date of the final 

rulemaking of EPA’s approval, and will 

be incorporated by reference by the 

Director of the Federal Register in the 

next update to the SIP compilation.3

EPA has made, and will continue to 

make, these materials generally 

available through https://

www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA 

Region 4 Office (please contact the 

person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

preamble for more information). 

IV. Final Action 

EPA is approving the aforementioned 

changes to the South Carolina SIP, 

submitted on October 1, 2007, June 17, 

2013, and January 20, 2016, because 

they are consistent with the CAA and 

Federal regulations. EPA is publishing 

this rule without prior proposal because 

the Agency views this as a 

noncontroversial submittal and 

anticipates no adverse comments. 

However, in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register publication, 

EPA is publishing a separate document 

that will serve as the proposal to 

approve the SIP revision should adverse 

comments be filed. This rule will be 

effective October 16, 2017 without 

further notice unless the Agency 

receives adverse comments by 

September 15, 2017. 

If EPA receives such comments, then 

EPA will publish a document 

withdrawing the final rule and 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. All adverse comments 

received will then be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Parties 

interested in commenting should do so 

at this time. If no such comments are 

received, the public is advised that this 

rule will be effective on October 16, 

2017 and no further action will be taken 

on the proposed rule. Please note that if 

we receive adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

we may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable federal regulations. 

See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this direct final action for 

the State of South Carolina does not 

have Tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because it does not 

have substantial direct effects on an 

Indian Tribe. The Catawba Indian 

Nation Reservation is located within the 

South Carolina portion of the bi-state 

Charlotte Area. Pursuant to the Catawba 

Indian Claims Settlement Act, S.C. Code 

Ann. 27–16–120, ‘‘all state and local 

environmental laws and regulations 

apply to the [Catawba Indian Nation] 

and Reservation and are fully 

enforceable by all relevant state and 

local agencies and authorities.’’ EPA 

notes this action will not impose 

substantial direct costs on Tribal 

governments or preempt Tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 


pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
38828 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 16, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by October 16, 2017. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. See section 

307(b)(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: August 3, 2017. 

Anne Heard, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart PP—South Carolina 

■ 2. Section 52.2120(c) is amended 

under ‘‘Regulation No. 62.5’’ by: 

■ a. Under ‘‘Standard No. 5’’: 

■ i. Revising the entry ‘‘Section I’’; 

■ ii. Under ‘‘Section I’’ revising the 

entries ‘‘Part A’’ and ‘‘Part G’’; 

■ iii. Revising the entry ‘‘Section II’’; 

■ iv. Adding under ‘‘Section II’’ the 

entry ‘‘Part A’’; and 

■ v. Revising under ‘‘Section II’’ the 

entries ‘‘Part B’’ and ‘‘Part Q’’. 

■ b. Revising the entry ‘‘Standard No. 

5.2’’. 

The revisions and additions read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2120 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS FOR SOUTH CAROLINA

State citation Title/subject 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval 

date 

Federal Register 

notice 

*******

Regulation No. 62.5 ... Air Pollution Control Standards ................ ........................ ........................

*******

Standard No. 5 .......... Volatile Organic Compounds .................... ........................ ........................

Section I ..................... General Provisions ................................... 4/26/2013 8/16/2017 [Insert citation of publication]. 

Part A ......................... Definitions ................................................. 4/26/2013 8/16/2017 [Insert citation of publication]. 

*******

Part G ........................ Equivalency Calculations .......................... 4/26/2013 8/16/2017 [Insert citation of publication]. 

Section II .................... Provisions for Specific Sources ................ 11/27/2015 8/16/2017 [Insert citation of publication]. 

Part A ......................... Surface Coating of Cans .......................... 11/27/2015 8/16/2017 [Insert citation of publication]. 

Part B ......................... Surface Coating of Coils .......................... 11/27/2015 8/16/2017 [Insert citation of publication]. 

*******

Part Q ........................ Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products.4/26/2013 8/16/2017 [Insert citation of publication]. 

*******

Standard No. 5.2 ....... Control of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) ........ 5/25/2007 8/16/2017 [Insert citation of publication]. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2017–17242 Filed 8–15–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2017–0385; FRL–9966–20– 

Region 4] 

Air Plan Approval; SC: Multiple 

Revisions to Air Pollution Control 

Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve changes to the South 

Carolina State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) to revise miscellaneous rules 

covering air pollution control standards. 

EPA is approving portions of SIP 

revisions submitted by the State of 

South Carolina, through the South 

Carolina Department of Health and 

Environmental Control (SC DHEC), on 


pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES