alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Focus  Enhancements,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Brett Moyer,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/Brett A. Moyer
-----------------------
Brett A. Moyer
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2003

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350.  A signed  original of this written  statement or other  document
authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise  adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement,  required
by Section 906, has been provided to Focus Enhancements, Inc. and such statement
will be retained by Focus Enhancements, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          73,867
<SECURITIES>                                         7
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     97,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               340,680
<PP&E>                                         516,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                 301,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 581,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,653
<BONDS>                                        164,338
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,053
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,709
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   581,710
<SALES>                                        838,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               849,261
<CGS>                                          715,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  715,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,495
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,028
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01


</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3356 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit individuals eligible 

for Indian Health Service assistance to qualify for health savings accounts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 

Mr. HELLER (for himself and Ms. HEITKAMP) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

individuals eligible for Indian Health Service assistance 

to qualify for health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American 

5 Health Savings Improvement Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3356 IS

1 SEC. 2. INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR INDIAN HEALTH SERV2 ICE ASSISTANCE NOT DISQUALIFIED FROM 

3 HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(c)(1) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS EL8 IGIBLE FOR ASSISTANCE UNDER INDIAN

9 HEALTH SERVICE PROGRAMS.—For purposes of 

10 subparagraph (A)(ii), an individual shall not be 

11 treated as covered under a health plan de12 scribed in such subparagraph merely because 

13 the individual receives hospital care or medical 

14 services under a medical care program of the 

15 Indian Health Service or of a tribal organiza16 tion.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

19 December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 05-50303

 Cons. w/ 05-50305

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

RONALD LEE QUALLS

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

 Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(04-CR-34)

---------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

sentence is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand cases to the district court for resentencing is granted.

____________________

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5

th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 27, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1781]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 20, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Lake Shore Wisconsin Corporation, Sheboygan, Wisconsin; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Hiawatha 
Bancshares, Inc., Hager City, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Hiawatha National Bank, Hager City, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 23, 
2009.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-1781 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
**STATSURE        DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.**

**June        30, 2006**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. for                the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and                Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A                of                StatSure Diagnostic Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006                fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and                results of operations of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | /s/                Steve M. Peltzman                                                   |
|        |   |   | Steve                M. PeltzmanChief                Executive Officer                 |
|        |   |   | (principal                executive officerand                duly authorized officer) |

----
#### In re: Luke FOUT AND Todd WUERDEMAN LITIGATION.

MDL No. 2110.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

Dec. 2, 2009.

Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN, W. ROYAL FURGESON, JR., FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. and DAVID G. TRAGER, Judges of the Panel.

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel: Common defendant/third-party defendant CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSX) has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for centralization of this litigation in the Southern District of Ohio. This litigation currently consists of three actions: two actions already pending in the Southern District of Ohio, and one action pending in the Northern District of Illinois, as listed on Schedule A. Responding parties Basic Chemical Solutions, LLC, and GATX Corp. have submitted briefs supporting the motion.

After considering all argument of counsel, we will deny CSX’s motion. In this docket, there are only three actions pending in two districts. Moreover, all three actions are relatively straightforward personal injury actions arising from a single October 2007 incident in which hydrochloric acid leaked from a railcar at CSX’s Queensgate Yard in Cincinnati, Ohio. While the actions do share some questions of fact, the proponents of centralization have not convinced us that those questions are sufficiently complex and/or numerous to justify Section 1407 transfer at this time. Alternatives to transfer exist that may minimize whatever possibilities there might be of duplicative discovery and/or inconsistent pretrial rulings. *See, e.g., In re Eli Lilly and Co. (Cephalexin Monohydrate) Patent Litigation,*446 F.Supp. 242, 244 (J.P.M.L.1978); *see also Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth,*§ 20.14 (2004).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for centralization of these three actions is denied.

SCHEDULE A

MDL No. 2110 — IN RE: LUKE FOUT AND TODD WUERDEMAN LITIGATION

*Northern District of Illinois*

*Todd Wuerdeman v. Illinois Central Railroad Co.,*C.A. No. 1:08-6043

*Southern District of Ohio*

*Luke Fout v. CSX Transportation, Inc., et al.,*C.A. No. 1:08-721

*Todd Wuerdeman v. CSX Transportation, Inc., et al.,*C.A. No. 1:08-746
<PAGE>

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The subsidiaries of the Company at September 28, 1996 were:



    Name of Subsidiary                      State or Other Jurisdiction
                                                     in Which Organized

    AI/FOCS, Inc.                                     State of Delaware
      FOCS Midwest, Inc.                              State of Delaware
    Aero-Motive Company                               State of Michigan
    Aero-Motive (U.K.) Limited                           United Kingdom
      Woodhead France S.A.R.L.                                   France
        Elitec S.A.                                              France
    Central Rubber Company                            State of Illinois
    Daniel Woodhead Company                           State of Delaware
    H. F. Vogel GmbH Electrotechnische Fabrik                   Germany
    Woodhead Asia Pte. Ltd.                                   Singapore
    Woodhead Canada Ltd.                            Province of Ontario
    Woodhead de Mexico S.A. de C.V.                              Mexico
    Woodhead Industries (The Netherlands) B.V.          The Netherlands
      Akapp Electro Industrie B.V.                      The Netherlands
    W.I.S. Corp.                                    U.S. Virgin Islands

                                      20
No. 732.

#### Helwig *v.*United States.

See *ante,*p. 820.
1

See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744- 45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

NO. 07-05-0354-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

MAY 10, 2006

______________________________

BUFORD WILLIAM MEADOWS, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 31ST DISTRICT COURT OF WHEELER COUNTY;

NO. 4163; HON. STEVEN RAY EMMERT, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Memorandum Opinion

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

After a jury trial, appellant Buford William Meadows was convicted of sexually

assaulting a child. Punishment was assessed by the jury at 20 years imprisonment.

Appellant timely filed his notice of appeal. Appellant's appointed counsel has filed a motion

to withdraw, together with an Anders1 brief, wherein he certifies that, after diligently

searching the record, he has concluded that appellant's appeal is without merit. Along with

his brief, he has filed a copy of a letter sent to appellant informing him of counsel's belief
2

that there was no reversible error and of appellant's right to appeal pro se. By letter dated

March 29, 2006, this court notified appellant of his right to file his own brief or response by

April 28, 2006, if he wished to do so. The latter date has passed without the filing of either

a motion for extension or a response. 

In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders, appellate counsel discussed

four potential grounds of error and then explained why they were meritless. Thereafter, we

conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of appellate counsel's

conclusions and to uncover any error, reversible or otherwise, pursuant to Stafford v. State,

813 S.W.2d 503 ( Tex. Crim. App. 1991) and concluded that none existed.

Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is affirmed. 

Brian Quinn 

 Chief Justice 

Do not publish.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**

**VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC.**

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, of Valence Technology, Inc. (the “Issuer”).

I, Thomas F. Mezger, the Principal Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |
|--------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated:  November 8, 2007 |   | /s/ Thomas F. MezgerThomas F. Mezger |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
Exhibit 21 - List of Subsidiaries

                                               Jurisdiction of
                                                Incorporation
                                              ------------------
    Wilshire Oil of Canada, Ltd.              Alberta, Canada
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    San Francisco Oil                         State of California

    Rockland Resources                        State of Oklahoma

    Britalta Venezolano, Ltd.                 Alberta, Canada
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Sunrise Ridge Holding, Inc.               State of Delaware
    Jersey City, NJ

    Sunrise Ridge, L.L.C.                     State of Delaware
    Jersey City, NJ

    Biltmore Club Holding, Inc.               State of Delaware
    Jersey City, NJ

    Biltmore Club Apartments, L.L.C.          State of Delaware
    Jersey City, NJ

    350 Pleasant Valley Corp                  State of New Jersey
    Jersey City, NJ

    Global Equities Management Corp.          State of Delaware
    Jersey City, NJ

    Wellington Apartments, L.L.C.             State of Delaware
    Jersey City, NJ

    Van Buren, L.L.C.                         State of Delaware
    Jersey City, NJ

    Belair Drive, LLC                         State of Delaware
    Jersey City, NJ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000108633
<NAME>                        Wulf International Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                     1
<CURRENCY>                                              US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                  1
<CASH>                                                      62,260
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               98,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           675,730
<PP&E>                                                     105,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                              31,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             988,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      314,013
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                              1,352,800
<COMMON>                                                   286,791
<OTHER-SE>                                                (988,318)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               988,376
<SALES>                                                  3,364,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         3,364,498
<CGS>                                                    1,444,836
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            2,276,238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           (44,436)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           3,488
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (954,048)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                79,932
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (874,116)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (874,116)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  (.038)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (.029)



</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.2








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**(Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), John E.
      Baker, as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 9, 2006













/s/
      John E. Baker


John
      E.
      Baker


Senior
      Vice President &


Chief
      Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.