alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,695
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       753,342
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,419
<SALES>                                         27,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,851
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (156,278)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Sean M., Respondent, v Katrina M.E., Respondent. In the Matter of Katrina M.E., Respondent, v Sean M., Respondent. Charles Plovanich, Esq., Law Guardian, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 518]

Present—Smith, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Feradotto and Green, JJ.
No. 1116.

No. 1117.

#### Porter, Price Administrator, *v.*Lee et al.; and Porter, Price Administrator, *v.*Lee et al.

April 29, 1946.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.

*827
      *Solicitor General McGrath*for petitioner.

*Howell W. Vincent*for respondents.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Vail Resorts, Inc. (the "Company") that the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report. 

 

Date: November 13, 2003

        /s/ ADAM M. ARON        
Adam M. Aron
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: November 13, 2003

        /s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE        
James P. Donohue
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

 

This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not a part of the Form 10-K to which it refers, and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by each of the above signatories to the extent of his respective knowledge.
Allonge to Promissory Note of The Goldfield Corporation



 Exhibit 10-1 
 ALLONGE TO PROMISSORY NOTE 
 THIS ALLONGE, made as of March 6, 2009, by Pineapple House of
Brevard, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), and consented to by The Goldfield Corporation and Southeast Power Corporation (collectively the “Guarantor); is to be attached to and made a part of that certain Promissory Note
dated November 18, 2005, made by Borrower to Branch Banking and Trust Company (the “Lender”) in the principal amount of Fourteen Million and No/100 Dollars ($14,000,000.00) (the “Note”) which Note is as therein set forth.

 WHEREAS, there is due and owing under the above-described Note the principal sum of $3,047,434.72. Interest only on the outstanding
principal balance of the Note shall be payable monthly, commencing March 18, 2009, and continuing on the same day each and every consecutive month thereafter until May 18, 2010, on which date the entire principal sum outstanding under this
Note plus accrued interest shall become due and payable (the “Maturity Date”). 
 WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender desire to
amend the Note. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Promissory Note dated November 18, 2005 is amended as follows: 
 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT. The principal amount of the Note is hereby reduced to Three Million Six hundred thousand and no/100 Dollars ($3,600,000.00) from the present amount of
Fourteen Million and no/100 Dollars ($14,000,000.00). 
 All other terms and conditions of said Promissory Note remain in full force and
effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this document the year first above written. 
  

									
		 		 		 	BORROWER:
		 		 		 	Pineapple House of Brevard, Inc.
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ STEPHEN R. WHERRY

		 		 		 		 	Stephen R. Wherry, Treasurer
			
	GUARANTOR:	 		 	GUARANTOR:
	The Goldfield Corporation	 		 	Southeast Power Corporation
					
	By:	 	 /s/ STEPHEN R. WHERRY
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ STEPHEN R. WHERRY

		 	Stephen R. Wherry, Senior Vice President	 		 		 	Stephen R. Wherry, Treasurer
				
		 		 		 	LENDER:
		 		 		 	Branch Banking & Trust Co
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ BARRY FORBES

		 		 		 		 	Barry Forbes, Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 12

                  COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                For Year Ended December 31, 1995

                                  (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)



                                                       West Penn Power Company

Earnings:
       Net Income                                                  $117,879
       Fixed charges (see below)                                     69,520
       Income taxes                                                  61,636

       Total earnings                                              $249,035


Fixed Charges:
       Interest on long-term debt                                  $ 64,571
       Other interest                                                 3,331
       Estimated interest                                   
         component of rentals                                         1,618

       Total fixed charges                                         $ 69,520


Ratio of Earnings to          
  Fixed Charges                                                        3.58
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Hugo REYES-MENDOZA, also known as Ricardo Martinez Perez, also known as Ricardo Perez Martinez, also known as Pedro Martinez Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10300

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Pedro Martinez Hernandez, Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Christopher Allen Curtis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hugo Reyes-Mendoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Reyes-Mendoza has not filed a response and has been removed from the United States.

Following this court’s prior opinion in *United States v. Reyes-Mendoza,*665 F.3d 165 (5th Cir.2011), and the district court’s resentencing of Reyes-Mendoza on remand, the only issue properly before this court is the validity of Reyes-Mendoza’s sentence. *See Eason v. Thaler,*73 F.3d 1322, 1329 (5th Cir.1996); *Burroughs v. FFP Operating Partners,*70 F.3d 31, 33 (5th Cir.1995). However, because Reyes-Mendoza has been removed, any appeal from his sentence is moot. *See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis,*483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir.2007); *see also Bailey v. Southerland,*821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir.1987) (holding that this court must raise *399the issue of mootness sua sponte when necessary because it is a threshold issue and implicates Article III jurisdiction). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

                    LUNDELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

                      EXHIBIT 27 - FINANCIAL STATEMENT DATA

                THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT'S BALANCE SHEET AS OF
                OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
                YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                OCT-31-1996 
<PERIOD-START>                                    NOV-5-1995 
<PERIOD-END>                                     OCT-31-1996 
<CASH>                                               360,802
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         52,173 
<ALLOWANCES>                                           5,000 
<INVENTORY>                                        1,290,908 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   2,134,332 
<PP&E>                                             6,300,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       297,787 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    10,169,287 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1,639,638 
<BONDS>                                                    0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  5,165 
<PREFERRED>                                                0 
<COMMON>                                                   0 
<OTHER-SE>                                         5,231,273 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      10,169,287 
<SALES>                                              453,026 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     453,026 
<CGS>                                                304,592 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        304,592 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1,060,581 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   116,324 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (242,758)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (98,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (144,758)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0 
<CHANGES>                                                  0 
<NET-INCOME>                                        (144,758)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.03)
                                                             
                                                             

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: STEPHANIE HALL,

Relator. '

'

'

' No. 08

- 16

- 00330

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator = s petition for writ of mandamus

against the Honorable Guy Herman, Presiding Judge of the Statutory Probate Courts, and

concludes that Relator = s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We t herefore deny the

petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2017.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 324 Laid on Table in House (LTH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 324

         Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2003

 Ms. Pelosi submitted the following resolution; which was laid on the 
                                 table

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas during a meeting of the Committee on Ways and Means on July 18, 2003, 
        for the consideration of the bill H.R. 1776, the chairman of the 
        Committee on Ways and Means offered an amendment in the nature of a 
        substitute;
Whereas during the reading of that amendment the chairman of the Ways and Means 
        Committee directed majority staff of the committee to ask the United 
        States Capitol Police to remove minority-party members of the committee 
        from a room of the committee during the meeting, causing the United 
        States Capitol Police thereupon to confront the minority-party members 
        of the committee; and
Whereas pending a unanimous-consent request to dispense with the reading of that 
        amendment the chairman deliberately and improperly refused to recognize 
        a legitimate and timely objection by a member of the committee: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives disapproves of the 
manner in which Representative Thomas conducted the markup of 
legislation in the Committee on Ways and Means on July 18, 2003, and 
finds that the bill considered at that markup was not validly ordered 
reported to the House.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1







Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT




THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT (“First
Amendment”), between RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., f/k/a Rental Service Corporation (the “Company”) and Erik Olsson
(“Executive”), is entered into on February      , 2009.



RECITALS:




WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Amended and Restated Executive Employment and Noncompetition Agreement on
November 28, 2006 (the “Employment Agreement”);



WHEREAS, Executive and the Company have agreed to a temporary reduction of Executive’s Base Salary (as defined in
the Employment Agreement, and which shall be referred to as the Pre-Reduction Rate set forth below) through December
31, 2009, with the understanding that all other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the adequacy and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree as follows:



1. Executive’s Base Salary shall be reduced by twenty percent (20%), or $150,000 (the “Reduction”) for calendar
year 2009, from an annual rate of $750,000 (the “Pre-Reduction Rate”) to an annual rate of $600,000 (the
“Post-Reduction Rate”). The Reduction will be applied retroactively to January 1, 2009, and commencing on March 2,
2009, the Reduction will be made in equal installments from Executive’s compensation paid bi-weekly for the remainder
of 2009. Commencing on January 1, 2010, Executive’s Base Salary shall revert to the Pre-Reduction Rate. Any merit
increases in 2010 shall be based upon the Pre-Reduction Rate.



2. Executive agrees that the Reduction shall not constitute Good Reason to resign, as defined under Section 2.5(a)
of the Employment Agreement.



3. For all purposes under the Employment Agreement other than payment of monthly Base Salary under Section 2.1 of
the Employment Agreement and the calculation of eligible earnings for Variable Compensation, Base Salary shall be the
Pre-Reduction Rate. For example, for the avoidance of doubt, Severance Benefits (under Section 2.5), if any, shall be
calculated based on the Pre-Reduction Rate.



Except as modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full
force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this First Amendment, or caused this First Amendment to
be duly executed on their respective behalf by their respective duly authorized officers, all effective as of the date
and year first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	RSC EQUIPMENT RENTAL, INC.	 	EXECUTIVE
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 	
	By:

	 	 
	 	By:
	 	 
	
 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 
	 	Kevin J. Groman
	 	 	 	Erik Olsson
	
 
	 	SVP, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Roderick Deshawn STEWART, also known as Rod, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-2441.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 16, 2013.

Filed: April 22, 2013.

Michael S. Gordon, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roderick Deshawn Stewart, Grady, AR, pro se.

Lance G. Sullenberger, III, Sullenber-ger Law Firm, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellant.

*629Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Roderick Stewart directly appeals the judgment of the district court1 after he pled guilty to a drug charge and was sentenced to a within-Guidelines-range prison term. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 788, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), this court finds no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
exh10_21.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.21

    Compensation
Arrangements

    


    


            
On March 27, 2008, the Registrant’s Compensation Committee determined that the
performance of the organization in 2007 (as measured by the adjusted operating
ratio) did not meet the criteria established by the Frozen Food Express
Industries, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and that no cash bonuses or
restricted stock bonus awards would be paid to the Named Executive Officers, as
indicated in the table below.




    
      
        
          
            
              
                	
                        Executive
      Name and Position

                      	 
      	
                        Cash
      Bonus

                      	 
      	 
      	
                        Restricted

                        Stock

                        Bonus

                      	 
      	 
      	
                        Restricted

                        Stock

                        Shares

                      	 
      
	
                        Stoney
      M. Stubbs, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer

                      	 
      	
                        $

                      	
                        -

                      	 
      	 
      	
                        $

                      	
                        -

                      	 
      	 
      	 
      	
                        -

                      	 
      
	
                        S.
      Russell Stubbs, Senior Vice President and Chief Operations
      Officer

                      	 
      	 
      	
                        -

                      	 
      	 
      	 
      	
                        -

                      	 
      	 
      	 
      	
                        -

                      	 
      
	
                        Thomas
      G. Yetter, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

                      	 
      	 
      	
                        -

                      	 
      	 
      	 
      	
                        -

                      	 
      	 
      	 
      	
                        -
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  307
<PP&E>                                         33,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 26,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,552
<BONDS>                                        22,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,245
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   26,001
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  773
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (17)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (17)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (17)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        


</TABLE>