alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 123 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 5, 2003.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he is hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Ruppersberger (to rank immediately after 
Mr. Alexander).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 21

                            WELLCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



                                                            Percentage of Voting
                              Jurisdiction of                Securities Owned by
Name of Company               Incorporation                     Immediate Parent
Wellco Enterprises, Inc.      North Carolina                          Registrant
Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries:
Ro-Search, Incorporated       North Carolina                               100%
Ro-Search International Inc.  Barbados, West Indies                     100% (1)
Mo-Ka Shoe Corporation        Delaware                                     100%


(1) Owned by Ro-Search, Incorporated.

All  of  the  Registrant's   wholly-owned   subsidiaries  are  included  in  the
consolidated financial statements.





                                      -14-

<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                         PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                            VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly  report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the quarter ended June 30, 2006, of Valence Technology, Inc. (the "Issuer").

     I, James R. Akridge, the Principal Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify
that to the best of my knowledge:

          (i)  the Form 10-Q fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
               13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
               U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

          (ii) the information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in
               all material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of
               operations of the Issuer.

Date:  August 7, 2006                         /s/ James R. Akridge
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              James R. Akridge,
                                              Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          23,127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,344
<INVENTORY>                                     37,845
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,702
<PP&E>                                         105,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,538
<BONDS>                                             75
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,565
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,765
<SALES>                                        303,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,783
<CGS>                                          194,440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,048
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   104
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,108
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,443
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,443
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65
        

</TABLE>
# Sheet1

Time spent yesterday by activity
| 2.   | The Credit Agreement is hereby amended and modified as follows: |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|   | (b) | Subject to change from time to time in the Lender’s sole discretion, the sum of: |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (iii)   | The lesser of (A) $8,000,000.00 or (B) the sum of: |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|

| (1)   | The lesser of (A) the product of the Raw Material Inventory Advance Rate times Eligible Raw Material Inventory or (B) $1,000,000.00, plus |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The lesser of (A) the product of the Work in Process Inventory Advance Rate times Eligible Work in Process Inventory or (B) $100,000.00, plus |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| (3)   | The lesser of (A) the product of the Finished Goods Inventory Advance Rate times Eligible Finished Goods Inventory or (B) $6,000,000.00, plus |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (4)   | The lesser of (A) the product of the In-Transit Inventory Advance Rate times Eligible In-Transit Inventory or (B) $2,000,000.00, less |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (iv)   | The Borrowing Base Reserve, less |
|------------------|----------------------------------|

----

----

----

|  WELLS FARGO BANK,  NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy __/s/ Brian P. Bur_______________________________Brian P. BurIts: Assistant Vice President | WELLS-GARDNER ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONBy __/s/ James F. Brace_______________________________James F. BraceIts: VP, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                 |   AMERICAN GAMING & ELECTRONICS, INC.By __/s/ James f. Brace_______________________________James F. Brace      Its: VP and CFO |

----
Exhibit 31.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Michael C. Burandt, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Wausau Paper Corp.; and  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


|               |                              
|-------------- | -----------------------------
|April 29, 2014 | /s/  MICHAEL C. BURANDT      
|               | Michael C. Burandt           
|               | Chief Executive Officer      
|               | (Principal Executive Officer)
Order filed June 4, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00189-CV

____________

KEN OKORIE AND LINDA OKORIE, Appellant

V.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-13966

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due May 8, 2014. No brief or motion for extension of 

time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before July 7, 2014, the 

court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [ES-956-1420-BJ-TRST] Group No. 194, Minnesota

# AGENCY:

Bureau Of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Minnesota.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

The lands we surveyed are:

## Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota

T. 145 North, R. 37 West

The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion of the subdivisional lines and the dependent resurvey and survey of the subdivision of section 34 of Township 145 North, Range 37 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the State of Minnesota, and was accepted January 16, 2009. We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information.

If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest.

We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals.

Dated: January 21, 2009.

Dominica Van Koten,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor.

 [FR Doc. E9-1795 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 38939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Pistoia Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 12, 2017, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Pistoia Alliance, Inc. has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Context Matters, 
Inc., New York, NY; InfoChem GmbH, Munich, GERMANY; AMRA (Advanced MR 
Analytics AB), Linkoping, SWEDEN; Transcriptic Inc., Menlo Park, CA; 
WuXi AppTec, Shanghai, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Chris L. Waller 
(individual), Brookline, MA; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; 
VWR International, Darmstadt, GERMANY; and Ontoforce NV, Ghent, 
BELGIUM, have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. (as subsidiary Millennium 
Pharma, Inc.), Cambridge, MA, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Pistoia Alliance, Inc. intends to 
file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 24, 
2017. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on May 22, 2017 (82 FR 23298).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-17334 Filed 8-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Bryan Emilio LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-50393

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

*386Richard Gale Ferguson, Esq., Waco, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Bryan Emilio Lopez, Seagoville, TX, pro se.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Bryan Emilio Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### NOLAN v. COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, Inc.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Jan. 18, 1951.

Boyle, Feller, Stone & McGivern, New. York City (Alfred H. Wasserstrom, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Coudert Brothers, New York City (Walter R. Barry, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Motion for permission to -serve an amended complaint as proposed is granted. Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. provides that such leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.

Plaintiff moved promptly to eliminate its prayer for injunctive relief and an accounting when it discovered during the taking of the defendant’s deposition that the alleged infringing program was on a sustaining basis and that the defendant did not gain *195profits therefrom. It is no sufficient objection to the amendment that its purpose is to secure a jury trial. Certainly defendant’s rights are not prejudiced by the granting of this motion. Pallant v. Sinatra, D.C., *7*F.R.D. 293; Fischer & Porter Co. v. Brooks Rotameter Co., D.C., 86 F.Supp. 502; Lieberman v. Merkin, D.C., 2 F.R.D. 315.

Settle order.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of StatSure Diagnostic Systems, Inc.                for                the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and                Exchange                Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB                of                StatSure Diagnostic Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,                2007                fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and                results of operations of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20458

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SERGIO QUEZADA-SALAZAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CR-493-1

--------------------

August 23, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Sergio Quezada-Salazar appeals the sentence imposed after he

pleaded guilty to a charge of illegal reentry to the United

States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§§ 1326(a),(b). Specifically, Quezada-Salazar challenges the

district court’s imposition of a sixteen-level increase to his

offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), arguing that 

his prior conviction for transporting an alien is not an

aggravated felony.
No. 99-20458

-2-

Quezada-Salazar’s position is foreclosed by our opinion in

United States v. Monjaras-Castaneda, 190 F.3d 326, 331 (5th Cir.

1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 1254 (2000). 

 This appeal is without arguable merit and is thus

frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

It is therefore DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Counsel is

cautioned to be aware of the Supreme Court’s directive in Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
No. 805.

#### Lentin, doing business as J. Lentin Lumber Co., *v.*Porter, Price Administrator.

April 29, 1946.

327 U. S.805.
| Dated: December 10,    2013 |   | /s/ Diana P. Herrmann                                         |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   | President and TrusteeChurchill Tax-Free Trust                 |   |
|                                       |   |                                                          |   |
|                                       |   |                                                          |   |
| Dated: December 10,    2013 |   | /s/ Joseph P. DiMaggio                                        |   |
|                                       |   | Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerChurchill Tax-Free Trust |   |
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                            Broadway & Seymour, Inc.
                        Computation of Earnings per Share
                 (In thousands, except share and per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three months ended        Nine months ended
                                                               September 30,           September 30,
                                                          1998          1997         1998         1997
                                                         -------       ------      -------       ------
<S>                                                      <C>           <C>         <C>           <C>   
Net income (loss)                                        ($2,712)      $  874      ($5,379)      $2,137
                                                         =======       ======      =======       ======

Basic earnings (loss) per share:
    Weighted average common shares outstanding             8,765        9,128        9,023        9,061

    Net income (loss) per common share                   ($ 0.31)      $ 0.10      ($ 0.60)      $ 0.24
                                                         =======       ======      =======       ======


Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
    Weighted average common shares outstanding             8,765        9,216        9,023        9,193

    Addition from assumed exercise of stock options
                                                         -------       ------      -------       ------
    Weighted average common and common equivalent
        shares outstanding                                 8,765        9,216        9,023        9,193
                                                         =======       ======      =======       ======

    Net income (loss) per common and common
        equivalent share                                 ($ 0.31)      $ 0.09      ($ 0.60)      $ 0.23
                                                         =======       ======      =======       ======
</TABLE>