alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
**Section 1350 Certification**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Slippery Rock Financial Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William C. Sonntag, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
/s/ William C. Sonntag
Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2004
No. 1114.

#### Cudahy Packing Co. *v.*United States.

May 20, 1946.

*Vincent O’Brien*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General McGrath, Sewall Key*and *Robert N. Anderson*for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Watsco, Inc. (Watsco) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Albert H. Nahmad, as Chief Executive Officer of Watsco, Barry
S. Logan, as Senior Vice President of Watsco and Ana M. Menendez, as Chief Financial Officer of Watsco, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Watsco.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Albert H. NahmadAlbert H. Nahmad Chief Executive Officer February 29, 2008




/s/ Barry S. LoganBarry S. Logan Senior Vice President February 29, 2008




/s/ Ana M. MenendezAna M. Menendez Chief Financial Officer February 29, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Watsco and will be retained by Watsco and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Watsco for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Lalance & Grosjean Manuf’g Co. *v.*United States Stamping Co.

*(Circuit*Court, *D. Connecticut.*

May 19, 1885.)

Patents for Inventions—Novelty—Biscuit-Pans.

Patent Mo. 96,605, for “ an improved mode of uniting small biscuit-pans together in clusters, consisting' in providing' the pans with horizontal flanges and riveting them,” *held*void for want of novelty.

In Equity.

*Charles E.*Mitchell, for complainant.

*Charles R. Ingersoll,*for defendant.

Wallace, J.

The invention covered by the claim of the patent in suit as described in the specification “relates to an improved mode of uniting small biscuit pans together in clusters, °and consists in providing the pans with horizontal flanges around the tops, and joining them together by lapping the flanges and riveting them.” Biscuit *801pans assembled and united in clusters were old when tlie patentee first made them. Several modes had been adopted for uniting them. One was by assembling the pans on a sheet of tin in the desired contiguity, each pan being riveted through the bottom to a sheet. Another mode was hv riveting the pan» to a strip or bar of metal instead of a sheet, and uniting the several strips or bars. In other instances the sheet and bar were dispensed with, and the pans were united by rivets through their sides near the rim; and in others still, the edge of one pan was lapped and seamed over the edge of the adjacant pans.

It is testified to, and seems probable, that single flat-flanged biscuit pans, made of tin, were old. The patent contemplates pans of sheet-metal. But if flanged pans were new when made of tin or sheet-metal they were old when made of cast-iron. Ás shown in the patent to Waterman, granted April 5, 1859, pans of cast-iron were united in clusters by a cast connection, which was substantially a flange around tlie rim of each pan, extending from the rim of each pan to the flange upon the rim of the adjacent pan. This, being the prior state of the art, tlie defense of want of novelty is fatal to the patent.. The ordinary skill and judgment of the mechanic, with the prior structures before him, would suggest that such pans could be made with flanges and united by rivets through the flanges, if he desired to avoid inserting a rivet through the body of the pans. The Waterman structure alone would suggest the mode of the patent. As the flanges of that structure were united in the process of casting and could not ho so united when sheet-metal was to he used, the obvious way to unite them in sheet-metal would be by lapping and riveting or soldoring the-flanges.

The hill is dismissed.
**EXHIBIT    23**

**WEIS MARKETS,        INC.**

**Consent of Independent    Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We have issued our report dated          March 6, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial          statements, schedule, and internal control over financial          reporting included in the Annual Report of Weis Markets,          Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended          December 27, 2008. We hereby consent to the          incorporation by reference of said report in the          Registration Statement of Weis Markets, Inc. on Form S-8          (File No. 333-99535, effective September 13,          2002).

/S/Grant Thornton          LLP    Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaMarch 6, 2009
**Exhibit 21**Subsidiaries of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2007:     **Subsidiary Name**  **State of Incorporation**Kentucky Criterion Coal Company   DelawareWELLC — Ft. Lupton, Inc.   DelawareWELLC — Rensselaer, Inc.   DelawareWELLC — Roanoke Valley, Inc.   DelawareWestmoreland Coal Sales Inc.   DelawareWestmoreland Energy LLC   DelawareWestmoreland Resources, Inc.   DelawareWestmoreland Terminal Company   DelawareWestmoreland — Ft. Drum, Inc.   DelawareWestmoreland Technical Services, Inc.   DelawareCriterion Coal Co.   DelawareEastern Coal and Coke Co.   PennsylvaniaWestmoreland Savage Corp.   DelawareWestmoreland Mining LLC   DelawareDakota Westmoreland Corporation   DelawareWestern Energy Company   MontanaTexas Westmoreland Coal Co.   MontanaWestmoreland Risk Management, Ltd.   BermudaBasin Resources, Inc.   ColoradoNorth Central Energy Company   ColoradoWestmoreland Power, Inc.   DelawareWestmoreland — Roanoke Valley, L.P.   DelawareWestmoreland — North Carolina Power, L.L.C.   VirginiaWestmoreland Utility Operations, LLC   VirginiaWestmoreland Power Operations, LLC   Virginia
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 27
                           WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEETS AND RELATED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF
EARNINGS  FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1999,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              25,557
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      385,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,222
<INVENTORY>                                        445,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   889,590
<PP&E>                                           6,294,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,485,524
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,797,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              432,119
<BONDS>                                          1,628,843
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            55,794
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,147,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,797,861
<SALES>                                          4,077,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,077,969
<CGS>                                            3,261,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,261,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   278,108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    413,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                       152,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                260,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       260,475
<EPS-BASIC>                                           2.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.33



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Authentidate Holding Corp. (the company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, OConnell Benjamin, President of the company, and William A. Marshall, Chief Financial Officer of the company, respectively,
do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the company.

Dated: May 13, 2010



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ OConnell Benjamin |  |  |  | /s/ William A. Marshall
|President              |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1300182
<SECURITIES>                                   2578019
<RECEIVABLES>                                   123430
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          868473
<DEPRECIATION>                                  477340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                19900219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        7376651
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         94600
<OTHER-SE>                                     6597500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  19900219
<SALES>                                        4785199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5517570
<CGS>                                           838032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1011832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2437170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              540516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2068568
<INCOME-TAX>                                    780000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1288568
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1288568
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1





                        MED/WASTE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                  (UNAUDITED)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months ended March 31, 
                                            ----------------------------
                                                 1997            1996
                                            ----------------------------
 <S>                                        <C>              <C>        
 Net income                                 $   150,037      $    87,266
                                            ============================
 Weighted average shares outstanding          2,317,524        1,892,826
                                            ============================
 Net income per share                       $       .06      $       .05
                                            ============================
</TABLE>



                                      13
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)
 
 Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
 
 The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Form
10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  May
      9, 2008
                  By:
                  /s/ Harvey J. Berger,
      M.D.Harvey J. Berger,
      M.D.Chairman and Chief
      Executive Officer
 Date:  May 9,
      2008
                  By:
                  /s/ Edward
      M. FitzgeraldEdward
      M. FitzgeraldSenior
      Vice President,Chief
      Financial Officer
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




31
#### Flora GJURA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-566-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 13, 2012.

Gregory G. Marotta, Vernon, NJ, for Petitioner.

*92Andrew B. Insenga, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice (Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Ada E. Bos-que, Senior Litigation Counsel, on the brief) Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER, RICHARD C. WESLEY, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Flora Gjura, a native and citizen of Albania, seeks review of a January 31, 2011 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) reversing the September 9, 2008 decision of Immigration Judge (“U”) Terry A. Bain, which granted her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We withdraw our opinion previously issued in this matter, *Gjura v. Holder,*695 F.3d 223 (2d Cir.2012). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and specification of issues for review.

We need not decide the issue of whether young, unmarried Albanian women constitute a social group for asylum purposes. Even assuming arguendo that Gjura is a member of a social group, the petition for review is denied because Gjura failed to demonstrate past persecution. According to the 2006 State Department Country Report, individuals outside of Gjura’s defined group were equally subject to abduction and forced prostitution, including married women and children. Because Gjura failed to establish a nexus between her attacks and her membership in a particular social group, the BIA did not err in concluding that she did not establish eligibility for relief based on past persecution. *Gomez v. I.N.S.,*947 F.2d 660, 664 (2d Cir.1991).

In addition, to establish eligibility for relief, an applicant must also show that she suffered or will suffer persecution by either the government or private individuals that the government “is unable or unwilling to control.” *Rizal v. Gonzales,*442 F.3d 84, 92 (2d Cir.2006); *Matter of Acosta,*19 I. & N. Dec. 211, 222, 236 (BIA 1985), overruled on other grounds by *Matter of Mogharrabi,*19 I. & N. Dec. 439 (BIA 1987). Gjura alleged that the Albanian police repeatedly failed to investigate the attacks against her and prevent attacks from later occurring to her sister and cousin. However, the BIA reasonably found that Gjura failed to establish that the Albanian government was unable or unwilling to protect her from her alleged attackers. The 2006 State Department Country Report Gjura submitted indicated that the Albanian government had increased its prosecutions of sex traffickers, and was working to address trafficking-related corruption in its police force. Because a showing of government involvement or inability to control is required for a grant of asylum or withholding of removal, the BIA did not err in denying Gjura’s application. *See Rizal,*442 F.3d at 92; *Matter of Acosta,*19 I. & N. Dec. at 222, 236.

We therefore DENY the petition for review.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

					NO. 2-05-206-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF H.C.G., A MINOR CHILD						       

	----------

	FROM THE 325TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On June 7, 2005 and June 22, 2005, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 21, 2005
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of A.N.R. and * From the 118th District

Z.C.R., children, Court of Howard County,

Trial Court No. 49,237

.

No. 11

- 14

- 00192

- CV * January 15, 2015

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Opinion issued January 24, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00548-CV

———————————

OLDACRE MCDONALD, LLC AND MARK MCDONALD, QUATTRO 

DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND MICHAEL LIYEOS, AND MADISON 

DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, Appellants

V.

MATTRESS FIRM, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-73196

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellants, Oldacre McDonald, LLC and Mark McDonald, have filed an 

unopposed motion to dismiss their appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 

10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). These appellants contend that the appellee no longer wishes 
2

to pursue its claims against them and the parties will be filing a joint motion to 

dismiss with prejudice in the trial court and, thus, they move to dismiss their appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Three other appellants have filed two separate 

notices of appeal, but are not moving to dismiss, and no opinion has issued. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant appellants Oldacre McDonald, LLC and Mark 

McDonald’s motion and dismiss their appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 

43.2(f). The appeals by Quattro Development, LLC and Michael Liyeos, and

Madison Development Group, LLC, remain pending. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Landau.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 985 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 985

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 111 West Washington Street in Bowling Green, Ohio, as the ``Delbert 
                    L. Latta Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 985

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 111 West Washington Street in Bowling Green, Ohio, as the ``Delbert 
                    L. Latta Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 111 
West Washington Street in Bowling Green, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Delbert L. Latta Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Delbert L. Latta Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 13, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```