alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15230 and #15231; ARIZONA Disaster Number AZ-00050]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Arizona dated 08/03/2017. *Incident:*
                         Post-fire Flooding from Monsoon Storms. *Incident Period:*
                         07/19/2017 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 08/03/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/02/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/03/2018.
 ADDRESS: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Yavapai *Contiguous Counties:* Arizona: Coconino, Gila, La Paz, Maricopa, Mohave. *The Interest Rates are:* Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.500Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.750Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.610Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.305Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15230 6 and for economic injury is 15231 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Arizona. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: August 3, 2017. Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2017-16956 Filed 8-10-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit 32(b)**

**Certification of CFO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the year ended January 1, 2006 of Wendy’s International, Inc. (the “Issuer”).

I, Kerrii B. Anderson, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(i) the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. 

Dated: March 3, 2006 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wendy’sInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Wendy’s International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
---------------------------------------------------



We have issued our report  dated March 28, 2003  accompanying  the  consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Greenbriar  Corporation on
Form  10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2002.  We hereby  consent  to the
incorporation  by reference  of said report in the  Registration  Statements  of
Greenbriar  Corporation  on Form S-4 (File No.  28525) and on Form S-8 (File No.
33-50868 and 33-33985).




/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
----------------------

Dallas, Texas
March 28, 2003
No. 1152.

#### Loftus *v.*Ragen, Warden.

May 13, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of iPCS, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/TIMOTHY M. YAGER

---

Timothy M. Yager, President and Chief Executive Officer
December 28, 2004

/s/STEBBINS B. CHANDOR, JR.

---

Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr., Executive Vice President Operations and
Chief Financial Officer
December 28, 2004

---



QuickLinks
* Judge King did not participate in consideration of this

case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1933

JASPER E. BOYKIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY;

ALLSTATE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; NATIONAL

EMBLEM INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-686-3-17)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 3, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING,* Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Jasper E. Boykin, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas C. Salane, TURNER,

PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; Frederick

Scott Rhine, GESSLER, HUGHES & SOCOL, LTD., Chicago, Illinois, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jasper E. Boykin appeals from the district court’s orders

denying his motions to vacate a settlement and for reconsideration.

Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses

no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Boykin v. Allstate Ins. Co., No. CA-97-686-3-17 (D.S.C. May 26 & June 2, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
H. Res. 336

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 24, 2003.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2210) to reauthorize the Head Start Act to improve the school readiness of disadvantaged children, and for

other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Education and the Workforce. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. In lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the

bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the

purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part A of the

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolu-
2

•HRES 336 EH

tion. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be

considered as read. All points of order against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No amendment

to that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in

order except those printed in part B of the report of the

Committee on Rules. Each amendment may be offered only

in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a

Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read,

shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent,

shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject

to a demand for division of the question in the House or in

the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such

amendments are waived. After a motion that the Committee

rise has been rejected on a legislative day, the Chairman may

entertain another such motion on that day only if offered by

the chairman of the Committee on Education and the Workforce or the Majority Leader or a designee. After a motion

to strike out the enacting words of the bill (as described in

clause 9 of rule XVIII) has been rejected, the Chairman may

not entertain another such motion during further consideration of the bill. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House
3

•HRES 336 EH

on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole

to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute

made in order as original text. The previous question shall be

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of DiversiFax, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(the "Company") for the quarter ended February 28,2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge and
belief, that:

         1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: July 17, 2006


By:   /s/ Dr. Irwin A. Horowitz
      -------------------------
      Dr. Irwin A. Horowitz, Chief Executive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer


This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject
to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates by reference.
EXHIBIT 23





                         Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Willamette Industries, Inc.:

  We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements No.
33-5847,  No.  33-59515 and No.  33-59517 on Form S-8 of Willamette  Industries,
Inc. of our report dated February 13, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Willamette  Industries,  Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996
and 1995,  and the related  consolidated  statements of earnings,  stockholders'
equity  and cash  flows for each of the  years in the  three-year  period  ended
December 31, 1996,  which report  appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report
on Form 10-K of Willamette Industries, Inc.

                              KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Portland, Oregon
March 20, 1997
No. 1106.

#### Moore *v.*Illinois.

May 6, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
II 

Calendar No. 157

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 985

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 20, 2003

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 111 West Washington Street in Bowling 

Green, Ohio, as the ‘‘Delbert L. Latta Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 111 West Washington Street in Bowling Green, 

6 Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Delbert L. 

7 Latta Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 985 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Delbert L. Latta Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 157

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 985

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 111 West Washington 

Street in Bowling Green, Ohio, as the ‘‘Delbert L. Latta Post Office Building’’. 

JUNE 20, 2003

Reported without amendment
#### Jacob L. Mincer, Appellant, *v.*George W. Green, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

May, 1905.)

Defense — Former adjudication — Judgment for defendant in action on account stated — No bar to subsequent action for goods sold and delivered.

A judgment for the defendant, in an action upon an account stated, is not a bar to a subsequent action against him for goods sold and delivered, in which the plaintiff seeks to recover for the same goods specified in the account.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, ninth district, borough of Manhattan.

Marks & Marks, for appellant.

Wellbrock & Reynolds, for respondent.

Scott, J.

There was practically no denial by defendant that he had purchased the goods sued for (except one overcoat) and there was no proof that he had paid any more than the plaintiff admitted receiving. Therefore the judgment for the defendant can be accounted only upon the theory that the justice deemed that the judgment for defendant in the former action was a bar to this. The nature of that action and the issues triable therein are determined by the pleadings-which were written. Upon a reference to the complaint it will he seen that the action was solely upon an account stated. In such an action the plaintiff must stand or fall upon his. allegation that an account was stated and agreed upon. Failing that judgment must go against him, for he may not recover by proving the items of the account. Johnson v. Tyng, 1 App. Div. 610. It was in consequence of this rule that it was held in Derleth v. De Graaf, 51 N. Y. Super. Ct. 369, that a judgment fo-r defendant upon a cause of action founded upon an account stated, is not a bar to an action for goods *375sold and delivered although such sale and delivery was the subject in reference to which it was claimed that there had been an account stated. This is the law applicable to the case at bar.

Truas and Dowling, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Exhibit 4.3


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated March 26, 2013, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-186377) of Smart Trust, Tax
Free Income Trust, Series 13.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


March 26, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

          - 49 CFR Part 571
          - [Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0116]
          - RIN 2127-AK35

# AGENCY:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        NHTSA published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of July 20, 2009, a document delaying the compliance date of the sliding door provisions of a February 6, 2007 final rule. The regulatory text adopted by that document contained errors. This document corrects those errors.                    

# DATES:

Effective on September 1, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Sarah Alves, NHTSA Office of the Chief Counsel, DOT, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202) 366-2992, fax (202) 366-3820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

                    NHTSA published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of July 20, 2009 (74 FR 35131), a document delaying the compliance date of the sliding door provisions of a February 6, 2007 final rule (FR Doc. E9-17078). In the regulatory text adopted by that document, in S4.2.2.3, a statement erroneously reads: “This S4.2.2.3 applies to vehicle manufactured on or after September 1, 2010.” The statement should read: “This S4.2.2 applies to vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2010.” This document corrects that error.                

## Correction of Publication

In rule FR Doc. E9-17078 published on July 20, 2009 (74 FR 35131), make the following correction. On page 35135, in the third column, S4.2.2.3 is corrected to read as follows:

S4.2.2.3 This S4.2.2 applies to vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2010.

Issued: July 23, 2009.

Stephen R. Kratzke,

Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. 

[FR Doc. E9-17918 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
####                                                UNITED STATES
**REPORT ON SCHEDULE AND CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**The Board of Directors and ShareholdersWells-Gardner Electronics Corporation:The audits referred to in our report dated February 28,2006, included the related financial statement schedule as ofDecember 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and for the years endedDecember 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, included inForm 10-K. Thisfinancial statement schedule is the responsibility of theCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on this financial statement schedule based on ouraudits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, whenconsidered in relation to the basic consolidated financialstatements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all materialrespects the information set forth therein.We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (Nos.2-72090,2-09137,33-63920,33-61535,33-02981, and333-72629) onForm S-8 ofWells-Gardner Electronics Corporation of our report datedFebruary 28, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of Wells-Gardner Electronics Corporation as ofDecember 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, shareholders’equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31,2005, 2004, and 2003 and the related financial statementschedule, which reports appear in or are incorporated byreference in this annual report onForm 10-K ofWells-Gardner Electronics Corporation.Blackman Kallick Bartelstein, LLPChicago, IllinoisMarch 16, 2006
EXHIBIT 21


                 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Domestic Subsidiary                        Foreign Subsidiaries
Westvaco Development Corporation           Rigesa, Ltda.
Summerville, South Carolina                Valinhos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
                                
                                           Westvaco Asia, K.K.
                                           Tokyo, Japan
                                              
                                           Westvaco Europe, S.A.
                                           Brussels, Belgium
                                
                                           Westvaco Canada Ltd.
                                           Toronto, Canada

                                           Westvaco Foreign Sales Corporation
                                           Brussels, Belgium
                                
                                           Westvaco Hong Kong, Ltd.
                                           Hong Kong
                                
                                           Westvaco Korea, Ltd.
                                           Seoul, South Korea
                                
                                           Westvaco de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
                                           Mexico City, Mexico
                                
                                           Westvaco Pacific Pty. Limited
                                           Sydney, Australia
                                
                                           Westvaco Singapore Pte., Ltd.
                                           Singapore
                                
                                           Westvaco Specialty Products, S.A.
                                           Brussels, Belgium
                                
                                           Westvaco Svitavy, spol. s r.o.
                                           Svitavy, Czech Republic
                                
                                           Westvaco Taiwan, Ltd.
                                           Taipei, Taiwan
                                
                                           Westvaco Worldwide Distribution, S.A.
                                           Neuchatel, Switzerland
No. 985.

#### O’Neil *v.*Burke, Warden, et al.

June 3, 1946.

Second petition for rehearing denied.