alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 127

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 7, 2003.

Whereas the informed use of credit and other financial products and services benefits individual consumers and promotes economic growth;

Whereas financial literacy encourages greater economic selfsufficiency, higher levels of homeownership, and enhanced

retirement security, particularly among low- and moderate-income Americans;

Whereas the past decade has seen declining personal savings

rates, increased bankruptcy filings, and rising percentages of family income devoted to servicing household

debt;

Whereas millions of Americans, the ‘‘unbanked’’, have never

established account relationships at mainstream, insured

depository institutions;

Whereas 55 percent of college students acquire their first

credit card during their first year in college, and 83 percent of college students have at least 1 credit card;

Whereas 45 percent of college students are in credit card

debt, with the average debt being $3,066;

Whereas only 26 percent of 13- to 21-year-olds reported that

their parents actively taught them how to manage money;
2

•HRES 127 EH

Whereas a 2002 study by the Jump$tart Coalition for Personal Financial Literacy found that high school seniors

know even less about credit cards, retirement funds, insurance, and other personal finance basics than seniors

did 5 years ago;

Whereas a 2002 survey by the National Council on Economic

Education found that a decreasing number of States include personal finance in their educational standards for

students in Kindergarten through 12th grade;

Whereas financial literacy empowers individuals to make wise

financial decisions and reduces the confusion of an increasingly complex economy;

Whereas personal financial management skills and long-lived

habits develop during childhood;

Whereas personal financial education is essential to ensure

that our youth are prepared to manage money, credit,

and debt, and become responsible workers, heads of

households, investors, entrepreneurs, business leaders,

and citizens; and

Whereas the Jump$tart Coalition for Personal Financial Literacy, its State affiliates, and its partner organizations

have designated each April as ‘‘Financial Literacy for

Youth Month’’, the goal of which is to educate the public

about the need for increased financial literacy for youth

in America: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes and supports the goals and ideals of

‘‘Financial Literacy for Youth Month’’; and

(2) requests the President to issue a proclamation

calling on the Federal Government, States, localities,
3

•HRES 127 EH

schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, other entities, and the people of the United States to observe ‘‘Financial Literacy for Youth Month’’ with appropriate programs and activities.

Attest:

Clerk.
S07Y1121.

#### IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW WOLF.

(652 SE2d 546)

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court pursuant to Respondent Andrew Wolfs petition for voluntary surrender of license in which Wolf admits that on February 2, 2007 he entered a guilty plea in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to violating 18 USC § 371, a felony violation of the United States Code, and that by virtue of this conviction he has violated Rule 8.4 (a) (2) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d), the maximum penalty for which is disbarment. Wolf requests that he be allowed to voluntarily surrender his license to practice law and asserts that he understands that a voluntary surrender is tantamount to disbarment. The State Bar responded to Wolfs petition urging the Court to accept it.

We have reviewed the record and agree to accept Wolf s petition for the voluntary surrender of his license. Accordingly, the name of Andrew Wolf is hereby removed from the rolls of persons entitled to *626practice law in the State of Georgia. Wolf is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Decided October 29, 2007.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 38674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17140]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Record of Decision for the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Disposal and Reuse of Surplus 
Property at Naval Station Newport, Rhode Island

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Navy (Navy), after carefully 
weighing the environmental consequences of the proposed action, 
announces its decision to implement Alternative 1, the Navy's preferred 
alternative as described in the Final Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS) for the Disposal and Reuse of Surplus Property at Naval Station 
(NAVSTA) Newport, Rhode Island. This decision will make 158 acres of 
former NAVSTA Newport property available to the local communities of 
Aquidneck Island for economic redevelopment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Disposal and reuse under the chosen 
alternative is consistent with the Aquidneck Island Reuse Planning 
Authority's ``Redevelopment Plan for Surplus Properties at NAVSTA 
Newport'' (Redevelopment Plan) and Public Law 101-510, the Defense Base 
Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as amended in 2005 (BRAC Law). The 
complete text of the Record of Decision (ROD) is available for public 
viewing on the project Web site at https://www.BRACPMO.Navy.mil along 
with the Final EIS and supporting documents. Single copies of the ROD 
will be made available upon request by contacting: Mr. Gregory Preston, 
BRAC Program Management Office East, 4911 South Broad Street, Building 
679, Philadelphia, PA 19112-1303, telephone 215-897-4900, facsimile 
215-897-4902, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a3d283f3d352823742a283f292e35341a343b2c2374373336"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f382d3a38302d26712f2d3a2c2b30311f313e292671323633">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 7, 2017.
A.M. Nichols,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-17140 Filed 8-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Soyo Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period  ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Nancy
Chu, Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13a-14(b) or
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



 /s/ Nancy Chu
-----------------------
Nancy Chu
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005
IV 

House Calendar No. 23

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 190

[Report No. 108–70] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10 (legislative day, APRIL 9), 2003

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of April 10, 2003, providing 

6 for consideration or disposition of a conference report to 

7 accompanying the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 95) 
2

HRES 190 RH 

1 establishing the congressional budget for the United 

2 States Government for fiscal year 2004 and setting forth 

3 appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2003 and 

4 2005 through 2013. 

House Calendar No. 23

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 190

[Report No. 108–70] 

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

APRIL 10 (legislative day, APRIL 9), 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 1999, for Alternative Technology Resources and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         19,334
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  488,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               620,238
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 620,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,160,137
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,225,002
<COMMON>                                       261,355
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,026,256)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   620,238
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,079,305
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,362,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               405,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             405,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (688,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (688,786)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (688,786)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.03)
        


</TABLE>
# ** **

# **EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

 

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

## **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas B.Mackie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| /s/ Douglas B. Mackie   |
|-------------------------|
| Douglas B. Mackie       |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| August 9, 2002          |

 

 

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Aderonke Aderemi
Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00525

- CV

Trial court case number: 1176890

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County
On July 15, 2022, relator, Aderonke Aderemi, filed an “Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus on Trial Court’s Issuance of Immediate Writ of Possession After [Relator] Posted a Supersedeas Cash Bond of $12,480.00 and Injunctive Relief on [Real Party in Interest, Massandra KV Vineyards Owner LLC, a s Successor in Interest to PAC’s] Constructive Eviction.” In the mandamus petition, relator requests that we issue a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to “vacate and stay [its] order to execute an immediate [w]rit of [p]ossession,” and to allow r elator’s direct appeal of the Final Judgment entered in the underlying case to be considered by the Court. On July 15, 2022, the Court requested a response to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus . The deadline for any party to file a response to the ma ndamus petition was August 4, 2022. On August 3, 2022, the respondent, the Honorable Audrie Lawton

- Evans, filed a motion for extension of time to file a response to the mandamus petition. Judge Lawton

- Evans’ motion was granted, and the deadline for filin g a response was extended to August 18, 2022. On August 16, 2022, Judge Lawton

- Evans filed a second motion for extension of time to file a response to the mandamus petition, requesting that the deadline be extended to September 15, 2022. In the motion, Judge Lawton

- Evans states that relator is not prejudiced by the requested “brief extension,” because the Court stayed execution of the writ of possession pending consideration of the mandamus petition. Judge Lawton

- Evans’ second motion for extension is gra nted . The deadline for Judge Lawton

- Evans to file a response to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, if any, is extended to September 15, 2022

.It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_____ /s/ April Farris

_________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ____ August 23, 2022

______
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Projects in SARS and Influenza.                    

*Date:*                         August 13, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brenda Lange-Gustafson, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Scientific Review Program, Room 3122, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-3684,                         *bgustafson@niaid.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 20, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-17742 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8041

TERRY L.S. DORSEY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

J. PHILLIP MORGAN, Warden; J. DADDYSMAN, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. 

(1:12-cv-00285-GLR)

Submitted: April 23, 2013 Decided: May 1, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Dorsey, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, 

Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry Dorsey appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Dorsey v. Morgan, No. 1:12-cv-00285-GLR (D. Md. Nov. 15, 

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
SCWC-11-0000641 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

_________________________________________________________________ CINDY CHURAN KODAMA, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. ALAN HARUO KODAMA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000641; FC-D NO. 08-1-2862) ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Rec ktenwald, C.J., Na kayama, McKenna, P ollack, and Wilson , JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the abovereferenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was filed, see Hawai ʻ i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also Hawai ʻ i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/PlaintiffAppellee’s application for writ of certiorari, filed January 29, Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000641 10-FEB-2015 07:47 AM2015, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application

pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, February 10, 2015.
R. Steven Geshell /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
#### MORSHEAD et al. v SOUTHERN PAC CO. et al.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

May 7, 1903.)

1. Corporations—Stockholders’ Suit for Cancellation of Conveyances— Parties.

To a suit by stockholders to have conveyances and instruments executed by the corporation canceled and set aside as fraudulent, the corporation is an indispensable party, and in its absence the court will not consider a motion for a preliminary injunction.

¶ 1. See Corporations, vol. 12, Cent. Dig. § 810,

On Motion for a Preliminary Injunction to Restrain the Issue of Certain Bonds and Stocks. ’

Robert E. Cutting, for the motion.

Maxwell Evarts and Butler, Notman, Joline & Mynderse, opposed.

EACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The first prayer for relief is “that the deeds, conveyances, and instruments of transfer given in 1899 by the Central Pacific Railway Company be decreed to be fraudulent, *351void, and of no effect,” and every other relief prayed for in the bill is based upon the setting aside of such conveyance. The plaintiffs are stockholders of the Central Pacific Railroad Company. To such a suit the railroad company is an indispensable party. Davenport v. Dows, 18 Wall. 626, 21 L. Ed. 938. It has been named as a party defendant in the bill, but it has not been served, nor has it appeared. It is therefore not before this court upon this application, and in its absence the court will not examine into the merits of an application which must be denied for defect of parties.

Motion denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

 Federal Election Commission.

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. and its Continuation at the Conclusion of the Open Meeting on August 17, 2017.

# Place:

 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

 This Meeting Will Be Closed to the Public.

# Items to be Discussed:

                         Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.                              ( print page 37450)    

Matters relating to internal personnel decisions, or internal rules and practices.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

* * * * *

# Person to Contact for Information:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,

Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2017-17019 Filed 8-8-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P