i’vIATTE() PAT1SSO, el al.

Defendant.

Befbre the Court are thur motions filed by DeIndant. Matieo Palisso (Patisso). Each ofthese

motions is addressed below.

I. Defendant Patisso seeks to disqualify 1-loward Teichman from representing Bruce

I3aldinger. Esquire (Baldinger). More specifically, Patisso argues that Mr. Teichrnan does not have

a legal office established in New Jersey in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct 5.5 and

other professional conduct issues.

Apparently Mr. Teichman practices law with Plaintiff Baldinger at Baldingers office in

Morristown. New Jersey. As such, Patissos argument does not have merit. The motion to disqualify

is denied.

2. Patisso moves to strike the pleadings by Mr. Teichman because Mr. Teichman failed

to file a notice of appearance. However. Mr. Teichman has entered his appearance 1w filing

pleadings in this case and appearing at hearings. As such. Patissos motion to strike the pleadings isunreasonable and is denied.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Although Patisso notified that Court of the alleged perjury, no action against Mr. Teichman was

undertaken. Therefore, Patissos motion to strike pleadings and to seek emergency referral to Chief

Judge Rabner is denied.

4. Patisso requests by way of a motion that I reconsider my decision not vacate default

judgment against the National Fraud Constable. Patisso relies upon the same arguments set forth

in paragraph 1 above. Since motions to reconsider are only granted sparingly and the argument is

specious, it is denied. AK Stamping Co., Inc., v, Instrument Specialties Co., Inc., 106 F. Supp. 2d 627, 662 (D.N.J.

2000) (quoting NL Indus., Inc., v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 935 F. Supp. 513, 516 (D.N.J. 1996)).

IT IS on this gth day of December, 2011;

ORDERED:

1. Patisso’s motion to Disqualify Counsel Howard Teichman as Counsel for Bruce

Baldinger (docket entry 127) is denied;

2. Patissos Cross Motion Strike Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim (docket entry 154)

is denied;

3, Patisso’s motion to strike and emergency referral to Chief Justice Stuart Rabner for

Emergent Action (docket entry 157) is denied; and
Although Patisso notified that Court of the alleged perjury, no action against Mr. Teichman was

undertaken. Therefore, Patissos motion to strike pleadings and to seek emergency referral to Chief

Judge Rabner is denied.

4. Patisso requests by way of a motion that 1 reconsider my decision not vacate default

judgment against the National Fraud Constable. Patisso relies upon the same arguments set forth

in paragraph 1 above. Since motions to reconsider are only granted sparingly and the argument is

specious, it is denied. A. K. Slumping Co., Inc., v. Instrument Specialties Co. Inc., 1 06 F. Supp. 2d

627, 662 (D.N.J. 2000) (quoting NL Indus., Inc., v. (‘ommercial Union Ins. Co., 935 F. Supp. 513,

516 (D.N.J. 1996)).

IT IS on this 8t} day oF December. 201 1:

ORDERED:

Patissos motion to Disqualify Counsel Howard Teichman as Counsel for Bruce

Baldinger (docket entry 127) is denied;

2. Patissos Cross Motion Strike Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim (docket entry 154)

is denied:

3. Patisso’s motion to strike and emergency referral to ChiefJustice Stuart Rabner fbr

Emergent Action (docket entry 157) is denied; and
01?

PETER G. ShERIDAN. LT.S.D.i.