alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 55329-1-I.

Division One.

November 28, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Antonio D. Dennis, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 04-1-00565-0, James H. Allendoerfer, J., entered November 17, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Appelwick, A.C.J., and Schindler, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>9
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
<PERIOD-START>JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>SEP-30-1997
<CASH>2,794
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>80,340
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>3,050
<TRADING-ASSETS>0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>18,752
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>3,855
<LOANS>77,965
<ALLOWANCE>921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>110,951
<DEPOSITS>91,377
<SHORT-TERM>3,447
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>821
<LONG-TERM>5,980
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>0
<PREFERRED>0
<COMMON>2676
<OTHER-SE>6,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>110,951
<INTEREST-LOAN>5,182
<INTEREST-INVEST>1,170
<INTEREST-OTHER>0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>6,352
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>2,574  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>2,886
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>3,405
<LOAN-LOSSES>217
<SECURITIES-GAINS>3  
<EXPENSE-OTHER>2,193  
<INCOME-PRETAX>1,558
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>1,558  
<EXTRAORDINARY>(514)
<CHANGES>0
<NET-INCOME>1,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>1.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>4.38
<LOANS-NON>563
<LOANS-PAST>104
<LOANS-TROUBLED>11
<LOANS-PROBLEM>0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>761
<CHARGE-OFFS>75 
<RECOVERIES>18 
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>921
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>921
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>0
        

</TABLE>
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                 Washington, D.C. 20549

                                       Form 10-QSB

 X _____ Quarterly  report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996

   Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (No fee required)

For the transition period from           to

Commission file number 1-11586

                                  PTI HOLDING INC.
                  --------------------------------------------         
                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)


      Delaware                                                    13-3590980
 -------------------                                           -----------------
(State or jurisdiction                                         (I.R.S.Employer
 of incorporation or                                         Identification No.)
 organization) 


c/o 15 E. North Street, Dover, DE                                    19901
----------------------------------------                           -------
(Address of principal executive offices)                           (Zip Code)


                                     (302) 678-0855
                    (Issuer's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)


(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last 
Report)

       Check whether the issuer:  (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the  registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days.

Yes  X    No


       State the  number of shares  outstanding  of each  class of the  issuer's
classes of common equity, as of the latest  practicable date. As of November 13,
1996, 3,487,936 shares of the issuer's common equity were outstanding.








                                 
<PAGE>







                                        SIGNATURE

       In  accordance  with  Section  13 or  15(d)  of  the  Exchange  Act,  the
registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.

Dated:  November     , 1996


                    PTI HOLDING INC.




                    By/S/ Meredith W. Birrittella 
                        --------------------------- 
                         Meredith W. Birrittella,
                         Chief Executive Officer (authorized signatory)
                         Chief Financial Officer
```

                            THE AAL MUTUAL FUNDS

                                Form N-SAR for
                         Fiscal Period Ended 04-30-04

                              INDEX TO EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT NO.                           ITEM

    1.            Report on internal control by Independent Public Accountants.  (Item 77.B.)

    2.            Shareholder meeting report. (Item 77.C.)

    3.            Transactions effected pursuant to Rule 10f-3.  (Item 77.O.)
```
1 Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of A ppeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 31, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-50850

_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee

v. VICTOR HUGO MARTINEZ Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, Waco

--------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS, an d CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the
sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand the case to the Western District of Texas, Waco Division for resentencing is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative request

for an extension of time to file th e Appellee’s supplemental
brief 14 days from the denial of App ellee’s motion to vacate and
remand is DENIED AS MOOT.
IV 

House Calendar No. 85

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 319

[Report No. 108–209] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2691) making appropriations 

for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal 

year ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2003

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calender and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2691) making 

appropriations for the Department of the Interior and 

related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2004, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 2691) making appropriations for 
2

HRES 319 RH 

1 the Department of the Interior and related agencies for 

2 the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for other 

3 purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed 

4 with. All points of order against consideration of the bill 

5 are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill 

6 and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and con7 trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

8 the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate 

9 the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five10 minute rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill 

11 for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived 

12 except as follows: page 84, line 21, through page 89; page 

13 90, line 4 through line 9. During consideration of the bill 

14 for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the 

15 Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 

16 whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 

17 it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 

18 designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. 

19 Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. Dur20 ing consideration of the bill, points of order against 

21 amendments for failure to comply with clause 2(e) of rule 

22 XXI are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the 

23 bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

24 the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

25 been adopted. The previous question shall be considered 
3

HRES 319 RH 

1 as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 

2 passage without intervening motion except one motion to 

3 recommit with or without instructions. 
House Calendar No. 85

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 319

[Report No. 108–209] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2691) 

making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. 

JULY 15, 2003

Reported to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 326 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 22, 2003.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2799) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, 
and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of order against 
provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are 
waived except as follows: the first proviso under the heading ``National 
Telecommunications and Information Administration, Salaries and Expenses''; in 
section 201, all after ``prescribed by the Act''; the final proviso under the 
heading ``Federal Communications Commission, Salaries and Expenses''; the final 
proviso under the heading ``Federal Trade Commission, Salaries and Expenses''; 
section 603; and section 607(a) and (b). Where points of order are waived 
against part of a paragraph or section, points of order against a provision in 
another part of such paragraph or section may be made only against such 
provision and not against the entire paragraph or section. During consideration 
of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,597,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,242,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (166,989)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,545,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,367,865
<PP&E>                                       1,887,675
<DEPRECIATION>                               (585,818)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,985,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,508,330
<BONDS>                                        773,434
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           341
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,144,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,985,456
<SALES>                                     24,406,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,406,192
<CGS>                                       19,525,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,525,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,492,265
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (790,975)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (307,943)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (483,031)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (790,975)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
No. 756.

#### Strewl *v.*Sanford, Warden.

June 10, 1946.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General McGrath, W. Marvin Smith, Robert S. Erdahl*and *Andrew F. Oehmann*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11432 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DWI GHT CLARK TONEY, also known as “ D , ”

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14

- CR

- 466

- 5

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendant

- Appellant Dwight Clark Toney pleaded guilty, without a plea agreement, to conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, namely 3, 4

- methlyenedioxy

- N

- ethylcathinone (“ethylone” or “Molly”) . T he district court sentenced him within the applicable Guidelines range to 54 months of imprisonment, to be followed by three years of supervised release

. E thylone is not listed in the Guidelines, so the presentence report (PSR) used a drug with

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 22, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11432 Document: 00514482168 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/22/2018No. 16

- 11432

2 a comparable chemical structure, methlyenedioxy

- N

- ethylamphetam ine (“MDEA”), to determine the base offense level. S ee U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, comment. (n.6). Pursuant to the commentary to § 2D1.1, the PSR converted the different controlled substances to their marijuana equivalents to determine a single offense level. For the Molly/MDEA, the PSR used the Guidelines conversion rate of one gram of MDEA to 500 grams of mari juana

. On appeal, Toney argues that when the district court denied his objection to the 1:500 ratio, it committed a procedural error by failing to recogni ze its authority to vary from the Guidelines based on Toney’s policy arguments. The Government contends that plain error review applies b ecause Toney faile d to preserve this issue below

. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). Even if the issue was preserved, however, Toney is not entitled to relief. See United States v. Alcantar , 733 F.3d 143, 146 n.4 (5th Cir. 2013). The district court commits a “significant procedural error” by “ failing to calculate (or improperly calculati ng) the Guidelines range, treating the Guidelines as mandatory, failing to consider the [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a ) factors, selecting a sentence based on clea rly erroneous facts, or failing to adequat ely explain the chosen sentence. ” Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007)

. Here, th e district court repeatedly referred to the Guidelines as advisory, considered the parties’ argumen ts and the appropriate sentencing factors , and

gave reasons for its sentence , which reasons were tied to those factors. Toney has not shown any error, much less a plain one

. See United States v. Fraga , 704 F.3d 432, 439 (5th Cir. 2013).
T he district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 16-11432 Document: 00514482168 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/22/2018
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

PUBLICMEDIA WORKS, INC.

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. §1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Public Media Works, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB forthe period ending February 29, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shaun D. C. Edwardes,Executive Vice President, Acting Chief Financial Officer and director of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date:  August 11, 2004 | /s/ Shaun D.C. Edwardes                                                 |   |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             | Shaun D.C. Edwardes                                                     |
|                             | Executive Vice President,  Acting Chief Financial Officer  and director |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----

----
H. Res. 31

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 29, 2003.

Whereas, on Sunday, January 26, 2003, the Tampa Bay

Buccaneers dominated Super Bowl XXXVII, defeating

the Oakland Raiders by a score of 48–21;

Whereas the 27-year-old Buccaneers franchise won the National Football League’s World Championship in their

first-ever Super Bowl appearance;

Whereas coach Jon Gruden, in his first year as head coach

of the Buccaneers, led the team to the pinnacle of success;

Whereas the Buccaneers overcame adversity and defeated the

Oakland Raiders, a team credited with possessing the

number-one ranked offense in the National Football

League;

Whereas throughout the season the Buccaneers were led by

a number of players, most notably veterans Warren Sapp,

Derrick Brooks and John Lynch, who banded together to

form the number-one ranked defense in the National

Football League;

Whereas owner Malcolm Glazer’s unwavering dedication to

bringing together the most talented coaches and players

has resulted in the achievement of the most sought-after
2

•HRES 31 EH

honor in professional football: the Vince Lombardi trophy;

Whereas the Buccaneers are an integral part of the Tampa

Bay community;

Whereas the entire Tampa Bay community is proud of the

Buccaneers and their extraordinary season and tremendous accomplishment;

Whereas this championship is especially satisfying to the

dedicated Buccaneers fans who have loyally supported the

team since their inception in 1976; a very long journey

that has culminated in a Super Bowl victory and the recognition that the Buccaneers are the best football team

in the world: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the World Champion Tampa Bay Buccaneers for their

victory in Super Bowl XXXVII.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, PAUL J. EVANSON, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of WEST PENN POWER COMPANY;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                                            
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | /s/    PAUL J. EVANSON                     
|                     |  |  |  |                                            
|Date: March 11, 2004 |  |  |  | Paul J. Evanson Principal Executive Officer