alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 23359-6-III.

Division Three.

December 20, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Walter T. Davey, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 04-8-00255-5, Ellen K. Clark, J., entered August 24, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Sweeney, A.C.J., and Schultheis, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3395 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3395

              To require limitations on prescribed burns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 2016

Mr. Thune (for himself and Ms. Heitkamp) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To require limitations on prescribed burns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prescribed Burn Approval Act of 
2016''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) National fire danger rating system.--The term 
        ``national fire danger rating system'' means the national 
        system used to provide a measure of fire danger according to a 
        range of low to moderate to high to very high to extreme.
            (2) Prescribed burn.--The term ``prescribed burn'' means a 
        planned fire intentionally ignited.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service.

SEC. 3. LIMITATIONS ON PRESCRIBED BURNS.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall not authorize a prescribed burn on Forest Service land 
if, for the county or contiguous county in which the land is located, 
the national fire danger rating system indicates an extreme fire danger 
level.
    (b) Exception.--The Secretary may authorize a prescribed burn under 
a condition described in subsection (a) if the Secretary coordinates 
with the applicable State government and local fire officials.
    (c) Report.--At the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report describing--
            (1) the number and locations of prescribed burns during 
        that fiscal year; and
            (2) each prescribed burn during that fiscal year that was 
        authorized by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
[No. 31361-8-II.

Division Two.

December 20, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. David Allen Wright, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 03-1-05549-4, John A. McCarthy, J., entered February 6, 2004. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., concurred in by Hunt and Van Deren, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

** 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41460

Summary Calendar

 

OTIS RAY LEE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL WARREN ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CV-758

- - - - - - - - - -

July 16, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Otis Ray Lee, #560033, filed a pro se, in forma pauperis

civil rights action against Dr. Michael Warren, Dr. Owen J.

Murray, Dr. Russell McDonald, and Dr. Jason Calhoun. He alleged

that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious

medical needs. The district court, after conducting a Spears v.

McCotter** hearing, dismissed the complaint as frivolous and for

failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915
No. 97-41460

-2-

(e)(2)(B)(i) and (e)(2)(B)(ii). We have reviewed the record and

Lee’s brief on appeal and perceive no error by the magistrate

judge. Lee v. Warren et al., No. 1:96-CV-758 (E.D. Tex. Sept.

25, 1997).

The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. The appeal is DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 1
to  the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  33-34566)  pertaining  to the
Envirosource, Inc. Savings Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-26633),
Post-Effective  Amendment  No. 1 to the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8 No.
33-1549), and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  33-13728),  each of which pertains to  Envirosource,  Inc.'s  Incentive
Stock Option Plan,  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-46925) pertaining to
the Envirosafe Services,  Inc. Stock Option Plan,  Registration  Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-53019)  pertaining to the Envirosource,  Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan,
and the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8 No.  333-42954)  pertaining  to the
Envirosource,  Inc.  1999 Stock  Option Plan of our report  dated March 19, 1999
with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements of  Envirosource,  Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March  21, 2001
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                      BETTER MINERALS & AGGREGATES COMPANY
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       Year Ended
                                                                      December 31,
                                                                      ------------
                                              ------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 2001        2000       1999         1998          1997
                                              ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------   -----------
<S>                                           <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>
Earnings
--------
Income (loss) before income taxes             $  (12,343) $  (20,639) $    1,032  $  (16,871)  $   (1,961)
Fixed charges                                     35,988      36,647      19,870      10,401       10,578
                                              ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------   ----------
Total earnings                                $   23,645  $   16,008  $   20,902  $   (6,470)  $    8,617
                                              ==========  ==========  ==========  ===========  ==========

Fixed Charges
-------------
Interest expense                              $   35,625  $   36,359  $   19,590  $   10,269   $   10,513
Estimated interest in rental expense                 363         288         280         132           65
                                              ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------   ----------
Total fixed charges                           $   35,988  $   36,647  $   19,870  $   10,401   $   10,578
                                              ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========   ==========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                    --          --         1.1          --           --
</TABLE>

Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $12.3 million, $20.6
million, $16.9 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
No. 880.

#### Alker et al. *v.*Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

June 10, 1946.

The motion for leave to file a third petition for rehearing is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

Board Votes To Close July 21, 2009, Meeting

    In person and by telephone vote on July 21, 2009, a majority of the 
members contacted and voting, the Board of Governors of the United 
States Postal Service voted unanimously to close to public observation 
its meeting held in Washington, DC via teleconference. The Board 
determined that no earlier public notice was possible.

Item Considered

    1. Strategic Issues.

General Counsel Certification

    The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has 
certified that the meeting was properly closed under the Government in 
the Sunshine Act.

Contact Person for More Information:

    Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to 
the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. Moore, at (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-18019 Filed 7-24-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Alpine County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold its third meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on September 2, 2009, and will begin at 6 p.m. The meeting will be held in Alpine County at the Alpine Early Learning Center, 100 Foothill Road, Markleeville, CA 96120.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Marnie Bonesteel, RAC Coordinator, USDA, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Carson Ranger District, 1536 S. Carson Street, Carson City, NV 89701 (775) 884-8140; e-mail:                         *mbonesteel@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Vote on committee bylaws and elect a chairperson, (2) Vote on Title II projects, (3) Public Comment. The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: July 16, 2009.

Genny Wilson,

Designated Federal Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-17361 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
May 7, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NATHAN HILTON, M.D, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00697-CV V.

NEVILLYN WETTERMARK, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the order in favor of appellee, Nevillyn 

Wettermark, signed August 5, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We 

have inspected the record and find no error in the order. We order the order of the 

court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Nathan Hilton, M.D, to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 10.19

 

THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED
Exhibit 32

                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial officer of Peoples  Bancorporation,  Inc., each hereby certifies that,
to the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-Q of the issuer fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)or  15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

August 10, 2004

                                   s/R. Riggie Ridgeway
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   R. Riggie Ridgeway
                                   Chief Executive Officer


                                   s/Robert E. Dye, Jr.
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Robert E. Dye, Jr.
                                   Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 940 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 940

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the foreign 
  tax credit not be redetermined with respect to refunds of unlawful 
   foreign taxes to taxpayers who successfully challenge those taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2003

 Mr. Ramstad introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the foreign 
  tax credit not be redetermined with respect to refunds of unlawful 
   foreign taxes to taxpayers who successfully challenge those taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foreign Tax Credit Revenue 
Enhancement Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. FOREIGN TAX CREDIT NOT REDETERMINED FOR TAXPAYER SUCCESSFULLY 
              CHALLENGING UNLAWFUL FOREIGN TAX.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 905 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to adjustments to accrued taxes) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(6) Exception for taxpayers successfully challenging 
        unlawful taxes.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any taxpayer 
        to whom a tax is refunded in whole or in part if, pursuant to 
        an action brought by the taxpayer, such refund results from a 
        determination by a court of competent jurisdiction in the 
        country with respect to which such tax was imposed that such 
        tax is unlawful.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to refunds received in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11


                                          SALIVA DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.
                                         COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                                    (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              Three months ended June 30,       Six months ended June 30,
                              ---------------------------      --------------------------
                                  2002            2001            2002            2001
                              -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                           <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Basic earnings:

Net (loss)                    $  (115,707)    $  (135,843)    $  (131,278)    $  (363,532)
                              -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------

Shares:
Weighted common shares
outstanding                     8,929,491       1,203,129       4,999,626       1,176,807
                              -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------

Basic and diluted earnings
(loss) per share              $     (0.01)    $     (0.11)    $     (0.03)    $     (0.31)
                              ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========
</TABLE>


   NOTE: All common stock equivalents are anti-dilutive.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simula, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley P. Forst,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|    |  |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|   
|   
|   
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

| |                                                                                        | 
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Bradley P. Forst
        
Bradley P. Forst
Chief Executive Officer
August 19, 2002 |
**Exhibit 23.1**

We have issued our opinion dated March 31, 2008 accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of New Concept Energy, Inc. (Formerly CabelTel International Corporation) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of New        Concept Energy, Inc. (Formerly CabelTel International Corporation) on Form S-8 (File No. 33-50868 and 33-33985).

/s/ FARMER, FUQUA & HUFF, P.C.          Plano, Texas

March 31, 2008
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranskaryoticTherapies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned, Michael J. Astrue, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
Date: November 9, 2004              /s/ Michael J. Astrue   Michael J. Astrue   President, Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
IV 

House Calendar No. 76

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 309

[Report No. 108–189] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 438) to increase the amount 

of student loans that may be forgiven for teachers in mathematics, 

science, and special education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2003

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 438) to increase 

the amount of student loans that may be forgiven for 

teachers in mathematics, science, and special education.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 438) to in4 crease the amount of student loans that may be forgiven 

5 for teachers in mathematics, science, and special edu6 cation. The bill shall be considered as read for amend7 ment. The amendment recommended by the Committee on 
2

HRES 309 RH 

1 Education and the Workforce now printed in the bill shall 

2 be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be 

3 considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any 

4 further amendment thereto to final passage without inter5 vening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, 

6 as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chair7 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

8 Education and the Workforce; (2) the further amendment 

9 printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accom10 panying this resolution, if offered by Representative 

11 George Miller of California or his designee, which shall 

12 be in order without intervention of any point of order or 

13 demand for division of the question, shall be considered 

14 as read, and shall be separately debatable for ten minutes 

15 equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

16 opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 

17 instructions. 

House Calendar No. 76

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 309

[Report No. 108–189] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 438) 

to increase the amount of student loans that may be forgiven for teachers in mathematics, science, and special education. 

JULY 8, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
H. Res. 205

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 29, 2003.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES: Mr. Putnam of Florida.

Attest:

Clerk.