alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1    Certification of Wausau Paper Corp. under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of Wausau Paper Corp. (the Company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  Date:  February 29, 2012/s/ HENRY C. NEWELLHenry C. NewellPresident and CEO/s/ SCOTT P. DOESCHERScott P. DoescherExecutive Vice President, Finance(Principal Financial Officer)/s/ SHERRI L. LEMMERSherri L. LemmerInterim Chief Financial Officer,Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary,Treasurer, and Corporate Controller(Effective March 1, 2012)   This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Wausau Paper Corp. for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Exhibit
      32.1








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**(Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William H.
      Armstrong III, as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 10, 2006










/s/
      William H. Armstrong III


William
      H. Armstrong III


Chairman
      of the Board, President and


Chief
      Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### In the Matter of Frederick Gaston, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[856 NYS2d 892]

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of illicit drug use. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination in question has since been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Consequently, petitioner has been afforded all of the relief to which he is entitled and this matter must be dismissed as moot *(see Matter of Rodriguez v Leclaire,*44 AD3d 1205, 1206 [2007]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Kane and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Crude Oil Mutual Supply
Framework Agreement for Year 2009
 between
 PetroChina Company Limited
 and
 China Petrochemical Corporation
 Beijing
 December 2008




---



##### 



Crude Oil Mutual Supply Framework Agreement for Year 2009
  I.
    
    Quantities and Varieties of Crude Oil to Be Supplied Hereunder
 1.
    
    In 2009, PetroChina shall supply Sinopec with 6.81 million tons of domestic onshore
crude oil, including 4.20 million tons of blended oil produced at the Daqing Oil Region
(excluding replacement crude oil; including 1.55 million tons to be supplied during the
first quarter and the remainder to be supplied evenly during the next three quarters to
maintain an equilibrium between supply and demand), 0.55 million tons of oil produced at
the Jizhong Oil Region, 1.40 million tons of oil produced at the Changqing Oil Region,
0.60 million tons of oil produced at the Tarim Basin Oil Region, 50,000 tons of oil
produced at Erenhot Oil Region and 10,000 tons of oil produced at PetroChina Zhejiang
Exploration Company.
 2.
    
    In 2009, Sinopec shall supply PetroChina with 1.215 million tons of domestic
onshore crude oil, including 0.60 million tons of oil produced at the Tahe Oil Region and
0.50 million tons of oil produced at the Shengli Oil Region, 80,000 tons of oil produced
at Inner Mongolia (Baiyinchagan) Oil Region, 30,000 tons of oil produced at Yanqi Oil
Region, and 5,000 tons produced at Sinopec Southern Exploration and Production Company.
 3.
    
    The parties hereto shall, in principle, make available crude oil of the above
supply and take delivery thereof on an evenly distributed basis. The quarterly mutual
supply of crude oil may be adjusted as necessary by mutual agreement thereon and in light
of the availability of crude oil resources, price and the States macro-economic planning
requirements.
 II.
    
    Quality of Crude Oil
  1




---



##### 



III.
    
    Quarterly Supply Agreements; Sales and Purchase Contracts on an Enterprise-by-Enterprise
Basis
  IV.
    
    Price of Crude Oil
  V.
    
    Payment Guarantee
  Planning Department,
PetroChina Company Limited
    
    Production Management Department,
China Petrochemical CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ ZHOU
    
    By:
    
    /s/LIANDate: December 19, 2008
    
Date: December 19, 2008
 2
**Exhibit
      23.2**


**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting firm**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
      S-8 Nos. 333-119370 and 33-60845) of Wilshire Enterprises, Inc. of our report
      dated March 26, 2004 (except
      for Paragraph 17 of Note 2, as to which the date is March 30, 2006),with
      respect to the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity,
      and
      cash flows of Wilshire Enterprises, Inc.  in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
      for the year ended December 31, 2005.








New
      York,
      New York


March
  30, 2006


/S/
      Ernst
& Young LLP
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): March 12, 2014





Vail Resorts, Inc.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)





Delaware001-0961451-0291762(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)390 Interlocken CrescentBroomfield, Colorado80021(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(303) 404-1800





Not Applicable(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


[  ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[  ] Soliciting materials pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[  ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[  ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))











---







Item 2.02.  Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On March 12, 2014, Vail Resorts, Inc. issued a press release announcing its results for the three and six months ended January 31, 2014.  A copy of the press release is being furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(d) Exhibits.





A list of exhibits furnished herewith is contained on the Exhibit Index which immediately precedes such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.











---







SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Vail Resorts, Inc.Date: March 12, 2014By:/s/ Michael Z. BarkinMichael Z. BarkinExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer











EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1Press Release, dated March 12, 2014, announcing fiscal 2014 second quarter results.
Exhibit
32




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of WHX Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Corporation”), does hereby certify that:




The
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 2008 (the “Form 10-K/A”) of the Corporation fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.




/s/
      Glen
      M. KassanGlen
      M. KassanPrincipal
      Executive Officer


April 27,
2009







/s/
      James
      F. McCabe, Jr.James
      F. McCabe, Jr.Principal
      Financial Officer


April 27,
2009
#### DOWNING v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

April 29, 1901.)

No. 2,932.

1. Customs Duties — Classification — Coal-Tar Preparations—CabbolinEUM.

The article known as “earbolineum,” or “carbolineum Avenarius,” which consists of dead, oil modified by the action of chlorine gas, is dutiable under the provision in paragraph 15, Schedule A, § 1, c. 11, tariff act of July 24, 1897 (30 Stat. 152, U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1627), for “preparations of coal tar, not colors or dyes and not medicinal, not specially provided for,” and is not dutiable under the provision for “chemical compounds” in paragraph 3 of said act (30 Stat. 151, U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1627), or free of duty as “dead or creosote oil,” under paragraph 524 of said act (Free List, § 2, c. 11, 30 Stat. 197, U. S. Comp. St 1901, p. 16S2).

Appeal by the importers from a decision (G. A. 4426) of the.Board of General Appraisers, which affirmed the decision of the collector of customs at the port of New York.

Comstock & Brown, for the importers.

Chas. D. Baker, Asst. U. S. Atty.

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

The merchandise in question comprises dead oil modified by the fact that it has been subjected to the action of chlorine gas. It was assessed for duty under the provisions of paragraph 3 of the act of July 24, 1897, c. 11, Schedule A, § 1 (30 Stat. 151, U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1627), as a chemical compound or distilled oil, not specially provided for, at 25 per cent, ad valorem, and claimed as free under paragraph 524 of said act (Free List, § 2, c. 11, 30 Stat. 197, U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1682), as a product of coal tar “known as dead or creosote oil,” or alternatively at 20 per cent, ad valorem under paragraph 15 of the same act (30 Stat. 152, U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1627), as a coal-tar product or preparation, not a color or dye, and not medicinal, not specially provided for.

*1001This particular product is known commercially as “carbolineum” or “carbolineum Avenarius,” the last being the name of its proprietor. In any event, it is not dutiable as a chemical compound or distilled oil, under various decisions of the courts not necessary to.be here considered. The article is exactly and specifically provided for under paragraph 15, as a coal-tar product or preparation, not a color or ■dye, and not medicinal, etc. The evidence shows that it is bought and sold as carbolineum. There is no evidence that it is known as dead or creosote oil.

For the foregoing reasons the decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed, and the article should be assessed for duty under paragraph 15 of said act of 1897.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

         The following is a list of the active subsidiaries of the Company as
of March 26, 1999, indicating the jurisdiction of incorporation of each and the
names under which such subsidiaries conduct business.

       NAME OF BUSINESS (% OWNERSHIP)             JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
       -----------------------------              -----------------------------
       Ladenburg, Thalmann Group Inc. (100%)                Delaware
       Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co. Inc. (100%)                Delaware
       Thinking Machines Corporation (72.7%)                Delaware
       BrookeMil Ltd. (99.1%)                               Cayman Islands
       ALKI Corp. (100%)                                    Delaware

         Not included above are other subsidiaries which, if considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant
subsidiary, as such term is defined by Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


10-K




| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.

|                     |  |                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2006 |  | By: /s/ Albert AngrisaniAlbert Angrisani
    President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30889

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MELVIN LUTCHER, also known as Mel, also known as Big Mel,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:03-CR-338-2

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Melvin Lutcher, federal prisoner # 21092-034, appeals from the district

court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduction in his sentence.

He contends that the denial of his motion was an abuse of discretion because the

district court failed to take into consideration the crack/powder disparity and

gave too much weight to his prison disciplinary offenses.

We review the decision whether to grant or deny a § 3582(c)(2) motion for

an abuse of discretion. United States v. Evans, 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 12, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 08-30889 Document: 00511027179 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
No. 08-30889

2

A district court is required to consider the sentencing factors set out at 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) when contemplating a § 3582(c)(2) motion, but it need not explain that

it has done so. Id. at 673-74. A district court need not provide any reasons at

all for denying a § 3582(c)(2) motion. Id. at 674. We can assume that a district

court has considered any § 3553(a) arguments presented in favor of a sentence

reduction. Id. at 673.

The district court implicitly considered Lutcher’s rehabilitative efforts in

prison, see id., and explicitly considered Lutcher’s lack of rehabilitative efforts

generally. Lutcher, moreover, has a history as a habitual criminal. The denial

of Lutcher’s § 3582(c)(2) motion was not an abuse of discretion. See id. at 672.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 08-30889 Document: 00511027179 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
No. 1279.

#### Rusk *v.*United States.

June 10, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Williams Industries, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the Fiscal year ending July 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

October 14, 2005

/s/ Frank E. Williams, III
--------------------------
Frank E. Williams, III
Chairman of the Board,
President,
Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer


/s/ Christ H. Manos
--------------------------
Christ H. Manos
Treasurer, Controller
Exhibit 21 - List of Subsidiaries


                                                        Jurisdiction of
                                                         Incorporation
                                                         -------------

         Wilshire Oil of Canada, Ltd.                   Alberta, Canada
         Calgary, Alberta, Canada

         San Francisco Oil                              State of California

         Rockland Resources                             State of Oklahoma

         Britalta Venezolano, Ltd.                      Alberta, Canada
         Calgary, Alberta, Canada

         Sunrise Ridge Holding, Inc.                    State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         Sunrise Ridge, L. L. C.                        State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         Biltmore Club Holding, Inc.                    State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         Biltmore Club Apartments, L. L. C.             State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         350 Pleasant Valley  Corp                      State of New Jersey
         Jersey City, NJ

         Global Equities Management Corp.               State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         Wellington Apartments, L.L.C.                  State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ

         Van Buren, L.L.C.                              State of Delaware
         Jersey City, NJ
No. 286.

No. 291.

#### Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. *v.*Reconstruction Finance Corporation et al.; and Thompson, Trustee, *v.*Reconstruction Finance Corporation et al.

June 10, 1946.

*William V. Hodges*and *Frank C. Nicodemus, Jr.*for petitioner in No. 286.

*H. H. Larimore*for petitioner in No. 291.

*Acting Solicitor General Judson, John W. Davis, Edwin S. S. Sunderland, James L. Homire, Thomas O’G. FitzGibbon, Judson C. McLester, Jr., Henry W. Anderson, George D. Gibson, W. A. W. Stewart*and *Arthur A. Gammell*for respondents.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                      49,938
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              617,191
<ALLOWANCES>                               (63,843)
<INVENTORY>                              3,587,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         4,257,029
<PP&E>                                   1,976,882
<DEPRECIATION>                           1,244,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           5,098,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,401,432
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                 3,754,531
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             5,098,672
<SALES>                                  5,721,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         5,723,090
<CGS>                                    4,577,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            5,875,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         403,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (555,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                18,292
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (573,387)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.25


</TABLE>