alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3501 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3501

To require the Federal Communications Commission to submit to Congress 
 a report on promoting broadband Internet access service for veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2016

 Mr. Blumenthal (for himself and Mr. Booker) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Communications Commission to submit to Congress 
 a report on promoting broadband Internet access service for veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Broadband Access for 
Veterans Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON PROMOTING BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE FOR 
              VETERANS.

    (a) Veteran Defined.--In this section, the term ``veteran'' has the 
meaning given the term in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.
    (b) Report Required.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall 
submit to Congress a report on promoting broadband Internet access 
service for veterans, in particular low-income veterans and veterans 
residing in rural areas. In such report, the Commission shall--
            (1) examine such access and how to promote such access; and
            (2) provide findings and recommendations for Congress with 
        respect to such access and how to promote such access.
    (c) Public Notice and Opportunity To Comment.--In preparing the 
report required by subsection (b), the Commission shall provide the 
public with notice and an opportunity to comment on broadband Internet 
access service for veterans, in particular low-income veterans and 
veterans residing in rural areas, and how to promote such access.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1

                             GREENBRIAR CORPORATION
                         ALL ENTITIES AS OF MARCH 1997


1.   Altman Nursing, Inc
2.   American Care Communities, Inc.
3.   American Care Communities of Florida, Inc.
4.   American Care Communities of Sanford, Inc.
5.   American Care Properties I, Inc.
6.   American Country Time, Inc.
7.   Assisted Lending, Inc.
8.   Berne Village, Inc.
9.   CareAmerica, Inc.
10.  Carolina Care Communities, Inc.
11.  Complete Corporation*
12.  Crown Pointe Development - Corona (LP)
13.  Crown Pointe, Inc.
14.  Equivest Fairington, Ltd.
15.  Equivest, Inc.
16.  Equivest Oak Tree, Ltd.
17.  Equivest West, Inc.*
18.  Graybrier, Inc.
19.  Greenbriar Corporation
20.  Greenbriar Payroll Company
21.  Harlingen Retirement LC
22.  Hermiston Assisted Living, Inc.
23.  King City Retirement Corporation
24.  Lake James, Inc.
25.  Lewiston Group LLC
26.  Liberty Acquired Brain Injury Habilitation Services, Inc.
27.  Lincolnshire Partners
28.  Medical Concepts, Inc.*
29.  MRC Assisted Living, Inc.
30.  Neawanna By The Sea Limited Partnership
31.  Oak Harbor Retirement Center, Inc.
32.  Oak Harbor Retirement Center LP
33.  Oak Park-Clermont, Inc.
34.  Paradise-Greenbriar, Inc.
35.  Remuda Acquisition Corp.
36.  Retirement Housing Associates (LP)
37.  Rhoades/Powell, Inc.
38.  Rose Arbor of Ocala, Inc.
39.  Rose Garden Estates LLC
40.  Rose Manor of Cary, Inc.
41.  Rose Tara Plantation, Inc.
42.  Rose Terrace of Wendell, Inc.
43.  Roswell Retirement Ltd. Co.
44.  Roswell Senior Apartments Ltd. Co.
45.  RRSP, Inc.
46.  Sweetwater Springs Group, LLC
47.  Tara Management, Inc.
48.  The Briarcliff at Texarkana, Inc.
49.  The Denison-Greenbriar Inc.
50.  The Greenbriar at Muskogee, Inc.
51.  The Greenbriar at Sherman, Inc.
52.  The Terrace Retirement, Inc.
53.  Villa Del Rey-Roswell Limited Partnership
54.  Villa Del Rey-Seaside, Inc.
55.  VLS & Associates, Inc.
56.  Wedgwood Corporation
57.  Wedgwood Retirement Inns, Inc.
58.  Woodmark at Steel Lake LLC
------------ 
* inactive
**STATSURE        DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.**

**SEPTEMBER        30, 2006**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. for                the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities                and                Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A                of                StatSure Diagnostic Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended September                30, 2006                fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and                results of operations of StatSure Diagnostic Systems,                Inc. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                         |                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                         | /s/                Steve M. Peltzman |
|   | Steve                M. PeltzmanChief                Executive Officer(principal                executive officerand                duly authorized officer) |

----
| **Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Narrative) (Details)** | 9 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| Canyons Obligation [Member]                                          |           |
| Debt Instrument, Year of Maturity                                    | 2063           |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Debt Instrument, Year of Maturity
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**mtn_DebtInstrumentYearofMaturity**Namespace Prefix:**mtn_**Data Type:**xbrli:gYearItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_LongtermDebtTypeAxis=mtn_CanyonsObligationMember**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
#### Berry and others *v.*De Witt and others.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

June 16, 1886.)

1. New Trial—Jury—Prejudice—Expressions on Opinion.

That some of the jury indicated, by their language and manner in the jury-box, during the progress of the trial, that their minds were opposed to the defendant’s case, is not a ground for a new trial, when there is no adequate reason to suppose that any juryman was not impartial when the trial commenced, and when no means were taken by the plaintiff to cause a too hasty or prejudiced decision.

2. Same—Misconduct—Waiver.

Misconduct of a juror, in conversing with one of the plaintiffs during the trial, is waived, if known to the defendant at the time of its occurrence, and not made th% subject of a motion to the court.

Motion for New Trial.

*724
      *Henry E. Tremain,*for the motion.

*John E. Parsons,*against the motion.

Shipman, J.

This is a motion by the defendants for a new trial. The questions of law arising upon the bill of exceptions were not argued by the defendants’ counsel at any length. I shall not, therefore, enter into a written examination of these questions, but leave them for the consideration of the appellate court.

The defendants’ counsel relied, before me, for a new trial, upon the alleged prejudice and the manifested antagonism of some of the jurors against the defendants’ case. That some of the jury did indicate, by their language and manner in the jury-box during the progress of the trial, that their minds were opposed to the defendants’ ease, ’is true; but I do not think that this is a ground for a new trial, when there is no adequate reason to suppose that any juryman was not impartial when the trial commenced, and when no-improper means-were taken by the plaintiff to cause a too hasty or a prejudiced decision.

The alleged misconduct of a juror in conversing with one of the plaintiffs during the trial, and expressing an opinion upon the case, is strongly denied by the person with whom he is said to have conversed. If the allegation was true, the conversation was overheard and was understood by one of the defendants’ counsel, and was not brought to the notice of the court. Such misconduct of a juror during the trial, if known to the party at the time of its occurrence, and not made the subject of a motion to the court, is waived. A party cannot know, during the trial, a fatal objection arising from the misconduct of a juror upon the trial, and keep silence, and take advantage of it in the event of an adverse verdict. He is not permitted to “speculate upon the chances of a verdict.” *State*v. *Tuller,*34 Conn. 280.

The motion for a new trial is denied.
EXHIBIT 23.2

INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

        Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement.

        Woodhead Industries, Inc. dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP (“Arthur Andersen”) as its independent auditors, effective May 7, 2002. For additional information, see the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 8, 2002. After reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain Arthur Andersen’s written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company’s registration statements (Form S-8 File Nos. 333-87060, 333-36070, 333-26379, 33-77968 and 33-40414) and the related prospectuses (the “Registration Statements”) of Arthur Andersen’s audit report with respect to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of September 29, 2001 and for the two years in the period then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits the Company to file the Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statements, without a
<PAGE>   1
                                                         EXHIBIT 22 TO FORM 10-K
                                                     WESCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                                FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996

                          WESCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            PERCENTAGE
                                            OWNED BY             STATE OF
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                          REGISTRANT           INCORPORATION
------------------                          ----------           -------------
<S>                                         <C>                  <C>
Wesco Holdings Midwest, Inc.  . . . . .     100%                 Nebraska
   Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc.  . .     100%                 Illinois

       Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc.,
           Charlotte Service Center . .     100%                 Delaware
       Precision Brand Products . . . .     100%                 Delaware
   Wesco-Financial Insurance Company  .     100%                 Nebraska
       Kansas Bankers Surety Company . .    100%                 Kansas
MS Property Company . . . . . . . . . .     100%                 California
</TABLE>
# Major Work Stoppages Latest Numbers

Latest Numbers for Major Work Stoppages, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

- Major Work Stoppages Latest Numbers Major Work Stoppages																							Number of work stoppages involving 1,000 workers or more											           Beginning in the period					2(p)  in Apr 2024					Historical Data								           In effect in the period					3(p)  in Apr 2024					Historical Data																			Number of workers involved in work stoppages											           Beginning in the period					4.8(p)  in Apr 2024					Historical Data								           In effect in the period					7.8(p)  in Apr 2024					Historical Data																			Days of idleness resulting from work stoppages											           In effect in the period					91.4(p)  in Apr 2024					Historical Data								           As a percent of working time					0.00%(p,2)  in Apr 2024					Historical Data																p- preliminary
#### HUDSON v. DAVIES, RICHBERG, TYDINGS, BEEBE & LANDA et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Aug. 22, 1952.

Alexander C. Dick, New York 'City, for plaintiff.

Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for defendant Colonial Airlines, Inc.

Alexander & Green, New York City, for defendants Davies, Richberg, Tydings, Beebe & Landa and Alfons B. Landa.

*131KNOX, Chief Judge.

Inasmuch as plaintiff has failed to comply with the provisions of subdivision (b) of Federal Civil Rule 23, 28 U.S.C.A., his complaint against the defendants herein will be dismissed.

True enough, he alleges in paragraph 8 of his amended pleading that by reason of defendant Landa’s domination of the directors of Colonial Airlines, Inc., a demand upon them, prior to the commencement of this action, to cause suit to be instituted by Colonial against the other defendants herein for the relief now sought would have been futile, and plaintiff refrained from making such demand.

To my mind, this allegation is not enough to enable plaintiff to displace the right of Colonial and its directors to take action for the redress of such wrongs, if any, as have been committed against the corporation.

For a considerable time prior to the development of the first alleged cause of action, plaintiff was. a vice-president of Colonial. He continued as such until September 4, 1951. From that date until October 31, 1951 he was one of its employees. He was aware of the identities of the directors of the company as well as that of Landa. He must have known of the contract made between Colonial and defendant law firm 'On or about April 5, 1950. Notwithstanding, he made no protest to Landa or any of the company’s directors as to its impropriety until March 1952. If it be that a demand for proper action upon the part of the corporation and its directors would have been futile, plaintiff could have confirmed this fact by writing a letter to the officers and directors of the corporation.

Derivative actions, in my judgment, should not ordinarily be permitted to go to trial whenever there is a deliberate failure of the person who wishes to have charge of the lawsuit to comply with the provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Guth v. Groves, D.C., 44 F.Supp. 851.

In this connection, it may be said that if plaintiff desires to continue his litigation against the present defendants, it is not yet too late to comply with the requirements of subdivision (b) of Civil Rule 23.
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Slippery Rock Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endingMarch 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William C. Sonntag, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ WILLIAM C. SONNTAG      |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                             |   |
| **Chief Executive Officer** |   |

 May 13, 2003

25
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Shareholders and the Board of Directors 

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement No. 333-52874 on Form S-3 and Nos. 33-42278, 33-50039, and 333-105779 on Form S-8 of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. of our reports dated August 18, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Winn-DixieStores Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004 and June 25, 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows and related consolidated financial statement schedule for each of the years endedJune 30, 2004, June 25, 2003 and June 26, 2002, which reports appear in the June 30, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Jacksonville, Florida 

August 25, 2004
Exhibit 21.0


                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                                         State or
Entity Name                                              Country        % Owned
Big Bear Indian Art, LLC                                  Texas           100%
CableTEL AD                                              Bulgaria          75%
  Broadnet AD                                            Bulgaria         100%
  Bulmet EOOD                                            Bulgaria         100%
  CIS AD                                                 Bulgaria          88%
  Globo EOOD                                             Bulgaria         100%
  Globo Lom AD                                           Bulgaria          51%
  Union Cable OOD                                        Bulgaria         100%
  Union Television Velingrad OOD                         Bulgaria         100%
Crown Pointe, Inc.                                      California        100%
Gainesville Outlet Mall, LLC                              Nevada          100%
Gainesville Property, LP                                  Texas           100%
Gainesville Partners, LLC                                 Nevada          100%
Gaywood Oil & Gas, LLC                                    Nevada          100%
Graybrier, Inc.                                       North Carolina      100%
Greenbriar Financial Corporation                          Nevada          100%
Kellway Corporation                                       Texas           100%
King City Retirement Corporation                          Oregon          100%
Real Estate Investors, LLC                                Nevada          100%
Senior Living Management, Inc.                            Nevada          100%
Senior Living Management Payroll Company                  Texas           100%
Senior Property Management, Inc.                          Nevada          100%
Senior Property Management- CP, LLC                       Nevada          100%
Senior Property Management- OP, LLC                       Nevada          100%
Senior Property Management- WT, LLC                       Nevada          100%
SLM-Crown Pointe, Inc.                                    Nevada          100%
SLM-Oak Park, Inc.                                        Nevada          100%
SLM-Wedgwood Terrace, Inc.                                Nevada          100%
Wedgwood Retirement Inns, Inc.                          Washington        100%
Wedgwood Terrace, Inc.                                    Nevada          100%
Windsor Group, LLC                                    South Carolina      100%
Windsor House Greenville, LLC                         South Carolina      100%
No. 86.

#### Griffin *v.*Griffin.

April 29, 1946.

U. S. 220.
Exhibit
          32.1
 
  **CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO**
 **18
          U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  Pursuant
          to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
          Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Xedar Corporation (the
“*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,
          that:
  (i) the
          accompanying Amendment Number 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of
          the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “*Report*”) fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
          as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and
  (ii) the
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 By:
                /s/
                    Hugh H. Williamson, IIINovember  2,
                    2007
                
                Hugh
                    H. Williamson, IIIPresident
                    and Chief Executive OfficerXedar
                    Corporation