alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
fs1ex10ii_soact.htm


    Exhibit 10.2

     

    
      PROMISSORY
NOTE

       

      
        
          	 
      	
                  Date
      of Issuance

                
	
                  $3,802.69

                	
                   February
      27, 2009

                


        

      

       

      


      So Act
Network, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Maker"), with an address at 5715
Will Clayton, Parkway, #6572 Humble, TX 77338, for value received, hereby
promises to pay to the order of Greg Halpern (the “Payee”), with an address of
5715 Will Clayton, Parkway, #6572 Humble, TX 77338 or his designees, the
principal sum of $3,802.69, together with interest at the prime rate as of the
Date of Issuance until all principal under this Note is paid in
full.  The principal balance of this Note may be prepaid in whole or
in part, at any time and from time to time, without premium or penalty, together
with all accrued interest on the principal balance so prepaid. All prepayments
and the other payments under this Note shall be applied first to accrued but
unpaid interest, and then to the unpaid principal balance, until all principal
and accrued interest under this Note have been paid in full.

      


      No change, amendment, modification,
termination, waiver, or discharge, in whole or in part, of any provision of this
Note shall be effective unless in writing and signed by the Maker and Payee, and
with respect to a waiver or discharge so given by the Payee, shall be effective
only in the specific instance in which given.  The Maker acknowledges
that this Note and the Maker’s obligations under this Note are, and shall at all
times continue to be, absolute and unconditional in all respects, and shall at
all times be valid and enforceable.  The Payee, at his discretion, may
unilaterally offset any of his obligations to Maker by reducing any installments
at any time payable under this Note.

      


      In the event any one or more of the
provisions contained in this Note should be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in
any respect, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining
provisions contained herein shall not in any way be affected or impaired
thereby.

      


      This Note binds the Maker and its
successors and assigns, and Maker shall have the right to assign, transfer or
delegate its rights or obligations under this Note with the Payee’s consent, and
this Note shall inure to the benefit of Payee and its successors and
assigns.   This Note shall be construed in accordance with and
governed by the laws of the State of Delaware without giving effect to conflict
of law principles.

      


      


      So Act Network, Inc.

      


      


      By: /s/ Greg
Halpern                              


            Name: Greg
Halpern

            Title:   
CEO


      


      Greg Halpern

       

      
        By: /s/ Greg
Halpern
Technical Contact:                                      USDL:  06-1482
      (202) 691-6199  NCSinfo@bls.gov
Media Contact:                                          FOR RELEASE:  10:00 A.M. (EDT)
      (202) 691-5902                                    THURSDAY, AUGUST 24, 2006
Internet address:
      http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/home.htm

                        EMPLOYEE BENEFITS IN PRIVATE INDUSTRY, 2006

     Seventy-one percent of workers in private industry had access to employer-sponsored
medical care plans, and 52 percent participated in medical care plans in March 2006, the
Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today.  Sixty
percent of workers had access to retirement benefits, with 51 percent participating in
at least one type of retirement plan.  These findings are from the Summary, "National
Compensation Survey:  Employee Benefits in the United States, March 2006," published
today.  These results can be found on the BLS Web site
http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/sp/ebsm0004.pdf.

     These data are from the National Compensation Survey (NCS), which provides
comprehensive measures of occupational earnings, compensation cost trends, and details
of benefit provisions.  In addition to health and retirement plans, the survey also
covered paid leave, disability insurance, and other selected benefits.  The following
are some of the major findings:

     * Most employees covered by medical care plans were in plans requiring employee
     contributions for both single coverage and family coverage.  Employee contributions
     to medical care premiums averaged $296.88 per month for family coverage and
     $76.05 per month for single coverage.

     * Employer premiums for medical care plans averaged $617.18 a month per participant
     for family coverage and $266.50 a month for single coverage.  Employer contributions
     were higher for those employees who were not required to contribute than for those
     who were.

     * Fifty-one percent of employees participated in a retirement plan.  Twenty-percent
     of employees participated in defined benefit retirement plans, and 43 percent
     in defined contribution plans. (Some employees participate in both types.)

     * Paid leave was the most commonly provided employee benefit in the private sector:
     paid holidays were available to 76 percent of employees and paid vacations to
     77 percent.

     The release and Summary Report are available by e-mail request at NCSinfo@bls.gov,
by telephone (202) 691-6199, or on the BLS Internet site, http://www.bls.gov/ncs/home.htm.
Regional Information offices, listed on the Internet site,
http://www.bls.gov/bls/regncon.htm, also are available to answer any of your questions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          64,561
<SECURITIES>                                         7
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    133,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               329,064
<PP&E>                                         489,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                 293,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 551,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,300
<BONDS>                                        162,573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,053
<OTHER-SE>                                     167,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   551,610
<SALES>                                        747,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               752,913
<CGS>                                          637,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  637,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,437
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,355
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,082
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,192)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,890
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91
        


</TABLE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
  "Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated
  November 14, 1997, in the Registration Statement and related
  Prospectus of the PaineWebber Pathfinders Trust Treasury and
  Growth Stock Series 13.
  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
  New York, New York
  November 24, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 219 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                           May 7, 2003.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 766) to provide for a National Nanotechnology Research and 
Development Program, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Science. After general debate the bill shall be considered 
for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Science 
now printed in the bill. Each section of the committee amendment in the nature 
of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill 
for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 
shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 
been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any 
amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                             162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,811
<PP&E>                                          45,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,739
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,127
<SALES>                                         25,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,432
<CGS>                                           21,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,961
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,799)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,244)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,555)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,555)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)


</TABLE>
IV 

House Calendar No. 24

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 191

[Report No. 108–72] 

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 

concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 95) establishing the congressional 

budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2004 and 

setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2003 and 

2005 through 2013. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2003

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to 

accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 95) 

establishing the congressional budget for the United 

States Government for fiscal year 2004 and setting forth 

appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2003 and 

2005 through 2013.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 95) es-
2

HRES 191 RH 

1 tablishing the congressional budget for the United States 

2 Government for fiscal year 2004 and setting forth appro3 priate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2003 and 2005 

4 through 2013. All points of order against the conference 

5 report and against its consideration are waived. The con6 ference report shall be considered as read. The conference 

7 report shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and 

8 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

9 of the Committee on the Budget. 

House Calendar No. 24

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 191

[Report No. 108–72] 

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. 

Con. Res. 95) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2004 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2003 and 2005 through 2013. 

APRIL 10, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
#### Kenneth H. NEWKIRK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Anton BELL; Commonwealth, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 12-7793.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 19, 2012.

*262Kenneth H. Newkirk, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth H. Newkirk appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition for failure to comply with the court’s order. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Newkirk has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 5, 2015

Order 

May 5, 2015

151386-7(38)

In re KMN, Minor. SC: 151386-7

COA: 322329, 322883

Newaygo CC Family Division: 

14-000805-AD

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for the temporary admission of Philip 

(Jay) McCarthy, Jr. to practice pro hac vice under MCR 8.126(A) is GRANTED.
#### In the Matter of Amber A. and Another, Infants. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kathy A., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[852 NYS2d 904]

Present—Hurlbutt, J.E, Smith, Centra, Green and Gorski, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Molecular Dynamics, Inc.'s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,522
<SECURITIES>                                    14,623
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (261)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,320
<PP&E>                                           8,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,153)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,877
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,910
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,534)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,253
<SALES>                                         13,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,006
<CGS>                                            5,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,204
<INCOME-TAX>                                       144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,060
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,060
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of OPNET Technologies, Inc. (the Company), I, Mel F. Wesley, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                           
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 4, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mel F. Wesley                         
|                    |  |     |  | Mel F. Wesley                             
|                    |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
NUMBER 13-18-00392-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

GUSTAVO TIJERINA SANDOVAL, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee.

On appeal from the 197th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

 

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the State’s unopposed motion to stay the 

proceedings in this Court. 

Appellant was convicted in the trial court of two counts: count one imposed the 

death penalty and is on direct appeal with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, see TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 37.071(h); TEX. R. APP. P. 71.1. Count two imposed a sentence of 
2

life imprisonment and is before this Court. Appellant has filed briefs in both the court of 

criminal appeals and this Court on his conviction. 

The State has come before this Court asking us to stay the appeal before us 

because appellant’s briefs have points of error that overlap and the court of criminal 

appeals’ disposition could be dispositive of those points of error. Appellant’s counsel has 

indicated to the State that they have no opposition to the request. 

The Court, having fully examined and considered the State’s request to stay 

GRANTS the motion and ABATES the current appeal before this Court. The parties are 

ordered to notify this Court when the court of criminal appeals issues its opinion on 

appellant’s direct appeal in order for this proceeding to be reinstated.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

23rd the day of February 2021.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0 3 79 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CLAYTON LEE WELLKNOWN ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 5 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 28 2021

06/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0379
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0647 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DERRELL RUSSELL DOWD,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until February 28, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court January 27 2022

01/27/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0647