alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Zhilin Li hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 2, 2011
By:
/s/ Zhilin LiZhilin LiChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 205 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 29, 2003.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he is hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Resources: Mr. Putnam of Florida.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
George B. Toma, certify that:

(1)  I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wells-Gardner Electronics Corporation;

(2)  Based
on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

(3)  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;

(4)  The
registrant's other certifying Officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



(5)  The
registrant's other certifying Officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
Board of Directors:



(6)  The
registrant's other certifying Officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

|Date: February 20, 2003 | By: |  | /s/GEORGE B. TOMAGeorge B. Toma CPA, CMA
Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer & Corporate Secretary
|----------------------- | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranskaryoticTherapies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Michael J. Astrue, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |            |                                  | /s/ Michael J. Astrue |   |
|--------|-----------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Dated: | August 12, 2003 | Michael J. Astrue                     |                  |
|   |            | President and Chief Executive Officer |                  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc. and will beretained by Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings No. 2

July 15, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP09-508-001.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits Seventh Revised 
Sheet No 501 et al to its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh Revised Volume No 1.
    Filed Date: 07/14/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090714-0103.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 27, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-687-001.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, LP submits Substitute Seventh Revised Sheet 
308 to its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 1 to be effective 8/1/09.
    Filed Date: 07/14/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090714-0104.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 27, 2009.

    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the specified comment 
date. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all 
the parties to the proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5f3f0e7f6fadbd9dcdbd0e6c0c5c5dac7c1f5d3d0c7d69bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="72343720313d1c1e1b1c17210702021d000632141700115c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17365 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3306

CHARLES G. MORGAN,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,

Respondent.

Richard Segerblom , Richard Segerblom, Ltd., of Las Vegas, Nevada, argued for

petitioner.

Jane W. Vanneman , Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil

Division, United States D epartment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for

respondent. With her on the brief were Michael F. Hertz , Acting Assistant Attorney

General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Todd M. Hughes , Deputy Director.

Appealed from: Merit S ystems Protection BoardNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3306

CHARLES G. MORGAN,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,

Respondent.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board

in CASE NO(S). SE1221020082-M-3

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED July 22, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BRYNELL MCFARLAND,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00217

- CR

Appeal from the

363rd District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC# F

- 0872946

- W)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the judgment of

conviction should be modified to reflect that: (1) Appellant entered a plea of not true to each of

the violations alleged in the State’s Amended Motion to Revoke Probation or Proceed with an

Adjudication of Guilt filed on March 28, 2012; (2) the trial court found to be true allegations four

through twelve of the State’s Amended Motion to Revoke Probation or Proceed with an

Adjudication of Guilt filed on March 28, 2012; (3) Appellant did not enter a plea bargain with

respect to the State’s motion to adjudicate; and (4) Assistant District Attorney Brian Poe

represented the State during the April 27, 2012, adju dication proceedings . We therefore affirm

the trial court’s j udgment as modified

. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30 TH DAY OF JULY , 2014.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick Fulton, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[853 NYS2d 518]

Present—Martoche, J.P., Smith, Peradotto, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
exv10w17






Exhibit 10.17




AMENDMENT

TO

EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     WHEREAS, Strata Directional Technology LLC (the “Company”) and David K. Bryan (the
“Executive”) entered into that certain Executive Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 2007,
(the “Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement to comply with Internal
Revenue Code (“Code”) Section 409A and regulations issued thereunder;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of the original effective date
of the Agreement, as follows:




1. The second sentence in Section 5(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended and
restated as follows:




     “Such bonus shall be paid annually within 30 days following Allis-Chalmers’
release of its audited financial statements for each year during the term hereof,
but in no event earlier than January 1 of, and no later than December 31 of, the
calendar year following the calendar year with respect to which such bonus is
earned.”




2. A new Section 7(c) is hereby added to the Agreement as follows:




     “(c) Section 409A Limits on Payments to Specified Employees. Notwithstanding
any other provision of the Agreement to the contrary, if Executive is a “specified
employee,” as defined in Section 409A of the Code, except to the extent permitted
under Section 409A of the Code, no benefit or payment that is subject to Section
409A of the Code (after taking into account all applicable exceptions to Section
409A of the Code, including but not limited to the exceptions for short-term
deferrals and for “separation pay only upon an involuntary separation from service”)
shall be made under this Agreement on account of Executive’s “separation from
service,” as defined in Section 409A of the Code, until the later of the date
prescribed for payment in this Agreement and the 1st day of the 7th calendar month
that begins after the date of Executive’s separation from service (or, if earlier,
the date of death of Executive). Any such benefit or payment payable pursuant to
this Agreement within the period described in the immediately preceding sentence
will accrue and will be payable in a lump sum cash payment, without interest, on the
payment date set forth in the immediately preceding sentence.”




3. Except as modified herein, the Agreement is specifically ratified and affirmed.



1









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this Amendment to the
Agreement as of this 31st day of December, 2008, to be effective as herein provided.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	STRATA DIRECTIONAL TECHONOLOGY LLC:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Theodore F. Pound III
 

	 	 
	 	 	Printed Name: Theodore F. Pound III	 	 
	 	 	Title: Vice President and Secretary	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EXECUTIVE:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ David K. Bryan	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	David K. Bryan	 	 







2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 17, 2016

d0816

Order 

Clerk

August 17, 2016

153021 

SPENCER B. GUPPY, a minor, by his

Next Friend PAULA J. GUPPY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153021

COA: 328889

Kent CC: 14-003811-NO

WYOMING COMMUNITY CHURCH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER that trial court proceedings are stayed 

pending the completion of this appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                                H. R. 8

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

            To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 8

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
            To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Death Tax Repeal Permanency Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. ESTATE TAX REPEAL MADE PERMANENT.

    Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation 
Act of 2001 shall not apply to title V of such Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 18, 2003.

            Attest:

                                   Jeff Trandahl,

                                                                 Clerk.

                       By

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
#### In the Matter of Frank Fratello, Petitioner, v J. Farrell, as Superintendent of Wallkill Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 748]

*1116Lahtinen, J.

A search of petitioner’s prison cell recovered an altered electrical wire, an AM/FM radio and an “off duty permit” card signed by a facility deacon allowing petitioner to possess the radio. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of contraband, unauthorized exchange and tampering with an electrical device. A tier II disciplinary hearing ensued, during which the deacon testified that he signed the permit card authorizing petitioner to use the radio. Although the Hearing Officer noted that the deacon did not have the authority to issue permission for use of the radio, he nevertheless found petitioner not guilty of possession of contraband and unauthorized exchange. Petitioner was, however, found guilty of tampering with an electrical device. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We must annul the determination. The prison disciplinary rule that petitioner was found guilty of violating states that “[a]n inmate shall not alter, rewire, tamper or attempt to repair electrical outlets or any electrical device” (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [19] [ix]). A review of the hearing transcript fails to definitively indicate that the source or purpose of the electrical wire was ever established. Absent such proof, it cannot be concluded that petitioner actually tampered with an electrical outlet or device. Thus, the requisite substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt is lacking *(see Matter of Garofolo v Cunningham,*34 AD3d 1071, 1073 [2006]). Given our disposition, petitioner’s contention that the misbehavior report was deficient is academic.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted and the Commissioner of Correctional Services is directed to expunge all references to this matter from petitioner’s institutional record.
#### JOHNSON & JOHNSON v. HEROLD, Collector of Internal Revenue for Fifth District of New Jersey.

(Circuit Court, D. New Jersey.

May 21, 1903.)

Willard P. Voorhees, for complainants.

David O. Watkins, U..S. Atty., for defendant.

ARCHBAED, District Judge.

By agreement of the parties this case was heard by the court without a jury, under the provisions of the statute. The facts are substantially the same as those in the case of Johnson & Johnson v. W. D. Rutan, Collector, 122 Fed. 993. In accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in that case, judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $2,161.10, being the amount of internal revenue taxes improperly collected by the defendant, with interest from January 1, 1900, to this date.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


                               LETTER OF CONSENT

                         CONSENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

  As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 relating to the stock
incentive plans of The Wiser Oil Company (the "Company"), (Nos. 33-44171, 33-
62441, 33-44172, 333-22525 and 333-15083), of certain data from our report
entitled "The Wiser Oil Company Canada Ltd. Reserve Appraisal and Economic
Evaluation effective January 1, 2001" with respect to the oil and gas reserves
of the Company, the future net revenues therefrom and present values
attributable to these reserves included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and
to all references to our firm included in this Annual Report.

                                Yours very truly,

                                GILBERT LAUSTSEN JUNG ASSOCIATES LTD.


                                /s/ Wayne W. Chow, P. Eng.
                                Vice-President

March 26, 2001
Calgary, Canada
Exhibit 10.28  Wausau Paper Corp. 2009 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan   A portion of each individual officers grant, referred to below as the Retention Award, will vest upon meeting certain criteria relating to continued employment with the Company.  The remaining portion of the grant, referred to below as the Performance Incentive, will vest upon meeting both performance and continued employment criteria.  The maximum potential award for the CEO, chief financial officer, and each of the other named executive officers is described in the Total Opportunity column below.  Restricted Stock or Performance Units GrantedRetention Award*Maximum
Performance Incentive**Total OpportunityCEO18,13254,39772,529Executive Vice PresidentFinance5,98417,95123,935Senior Vice President, Towel & Tissue4,48814,95919,447Senior Vice President, Specialty Products4,42014,73319,153Senior Vice President, Printing & Writing4,10713,69017,797  *The Retention Award is a grant of restricted stock units equal to 25% of base salary, which vests based on continuous employment with the Company (in the same position or in a position with greater authority) through January 5, 2011. **The Performance Incentive is a grant of performance units equal to a specified percentage of base salary.  These performance units may vest and be converted to a right to receive common stock (or, in the Compensation Committees discretion, cash with an equivalent value) based on (1) continuous employment with the Company (in the same position or in a position with greater authority) through January 5, 2011; and (2) the Companys achieving levels of Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) ranging from 3% ROCE to 13% ROCE.  For purposes of this plan, ROCE is determined by excludingbase gains from timberland sales and adjusting for other extraordinary items (which may include, for example, facility closure charges, one-time expenses associated with certain major capital projects, or other similar items).  No shares of common stock or cash will be awarded if earnings are at the bottom of the targeted range of ROCE, and the number of shares of common stock or cash awarded will increase on a pro rata basis to the maximum potential award if ROCE is at the top of the targeted range.   Note: This Exhibit 10.28 replaces Exhibit 10.1 filed by the Company with its Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 9, 2009 (the Prior Exhibit).  The Prior Exhibit referenced restricted stock instead of restricted stock units in its description of the Retention Award.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Barbara Page, principal executive and financial officer of Westland Development Co., Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Barbara Page                         
|Barbara Page                             
|Principal Executive and Financial Officer
|September 20, 2006