alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert E. Dye, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peoples Bancorporation,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         d)  disclosed  in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: May 7, 2004                     s/Robert E. Dye, Jr.
      --------------                    ----------------------------------
                                        Robert E. Dye, Jr.
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32




Section 1350 Certification




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, and United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Handy & Harman Ltd., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify that:




The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.




/s/ Glen M. KassanGlen M. KassanPrincipal Executive Officer


March 11, 2011







/s/ James F. McCabe, Jr.James F. McCabe, Jr.Principal Financial Officer


March 11, 2011
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6815

DANA LEE HOWARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-96-3628-JFM)

Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 7, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dana Lee Howard, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Howard v. Lanham, No. CA-96-3628-JFM (D. Md.

May 1, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
November 24, 1997
PaineWebber Incorporated
1200 Harbor Boulevard
Weehawken, New Jersey  07087
Dear Sirs:
 As counsel for PaineWebber Incorporated (the 
"Depositor"), we have examined an executed copy of the 
Trust Indenture and Agreement dated as of the Initial 
Date of Deposit (the "Indenture") which incorporates the
Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust, (the "Agreement"),
both between the Depositor, and Investors Bank & Trust
Company and the First National Bank of Chicago as
Co-Trustees (the "Trustee"). The Indenture established a
trust called The PaineWebber Equity Trust, Growth Stock
Series 18 (the "Trust") into which the Depositor deposited
certain stocks (the "Securities"), and moneys to 
be held by the Trustee upon the terms and conditions 
set forth in the Indenture and Agreement.  Under the 
Indenture, units were issued representing fractional
undivided interests in the Trust (the "Units").
 Based upon the foregoing and upon an examination of 
such other documents and an investigation of such 
matters of law as we have deemed necessary, we are of 
the opinion that, under existing statutes and 
decisions:
 1. The Trust intends to qualify for and elect tax
treatment as a regulated investment company under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code").
Assuming that such election is made and the Trust so 
qualifies, the Trust would not be subject to federal
income tax on such part of its net income and capital
gain, if any, as is timely distributed to Unitholders.
 2. The Trust will be subject to New York State and New
York City franchise and income tax. However, in any fiscal
year in which the Trust qualifies as a regulated investment
company under Section 851 of the Code, and in which the
Trust distributes all of its net income and capital gains
to Unitholders, the sum of such New York State and New York
City tax to which the Trust will be subject will not
exceed $2,055.00.
 We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an 
exhibit to the Registration Statement (File No. 33-59119)
relating to the Units referred to above and to the use of 
our name and to the reference to our firm in said 
Registration Statement and in the related Prospectus.
Very truly yours,
/s/ CARTER, LEDYARD & MILBURN
**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

 

  I, **Nicholas Kaiser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Semi-Annual Report on Form N-CSRS for the period ended May 31, 2012 (the “Report”).

 I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

  Date: July 30, 2012  /s/ *Nicholas Kaiser*  President 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

  I, **Christopher Fankhauser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Semi-Annual Report on Form N-CSRS for the period ended May 31, 2012 (the “Report”).

I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

Date: July 30, 2012

/s/ *Christopher Fankhauser*Treasurer, Chief Compliance Officer
No. 1170.

#### McLeod *v.*City of Jackson.

June 10, 1946.

*Joseph A. Padway*and *Herbert S. Thatcher*for petitioner.

*Marcellus Green, W. E. Morse*and *Garner W. Green*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
H. Res. 180

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 20, 2003.

Whereas the operation of correctional facilities represents a

crucial component of the criminal justice system of the

United States;

Whereas correctional personnel play a vital role in protecting

the rights of the public to be safeguarded from criminal

activity;

Whereas correctional personnel are responsible for the care,

custody, and dignity of the human beings charged to

their care;

Whereas correctional personnel work under demanding circumstances and face danger in their daily work lives; and

Whereas S. Res. 24 of the 108th Congress, as agreed to on

March 12, 2003, designates the week beginning May 4,

2003, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers and Employees

Week’’: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Correctional Officers and Employees Week’’; and
2

•HRES 180 EH

(2) honors all correctional officers and employees

for their service to their communities, States, and the

Nation.

Attest:

Clerk.
Tuesday 7th 

 May, 1996. 

Crystal F. Bowen, Appellants, 

 against Record No. 1532-94-3 

 Claim No. 163-78-25 

Automotive Industries, Inc. and 

 Employers Insurance of Wausau, Appellees. 

From the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission 

An order dated March 7, 1996 was received from the Supreme 

Court of Virginia on March 27, 1996 and is recorded as follows: 

Automotive Industries, Inc., et al., Appellants, 

 against Record No. 951843 

Crystal F. Bowen, Appellee. 

From the Court of Appeals of Virginia 

Upon consideration of the petition for appeal and the brief 

in opposition filed herein, an appeal is awarded the appellants from a 

judgment rendered by the Court of Appeals of Virginia on September 12, 

1995, in the above-styled proceeding. Upon further consideration, the 

said judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of 

Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of this Court's 

decisions in The Steinrich Group, et al. v. Claudia H. Jemmott, Record 

No. 950829, Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Linda Kay Martin, Record No. 951050, 
and Wampler-Longacre Chicken, Inc. et al. v. Shirley A. Biller, Record 

No. 951072 (March 1, 1996). 

This order shall be certified to the Court of Appeals of 

Virginia and to the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission. 

 A Copy, 

 Teste: 

 David B. Beach, Clerk 

 By: 

 /s/ Patricia H. Krueger 

 Deputy Clerk 

 A Copy, 

 Teste: 

 Clerk
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15240 and #15241; Oregon Disaster Number OR-00086]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oregon (FEMA-4328-DR), dated 08/08/2017. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides. *Incident Period:*
                         01/07/2017 through 01/10/2017.
 DATES: Issued on 08/08/2017. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/10/2017. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/08/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 08/08/2017, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Columbia, Deschutes, Hood River, Josephine. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15240B and for economic injury is 152410. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2017-17174 Filed 8-14-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEILANI J. LAKE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of 

Social Security, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18-55402 

D.C. No. 

3:16-cv-03021-GPC-JMA 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and submitted September 10, 2019 

Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, BENNETT, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Leilani Lake appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in 

favor of the Commissioner of Social Security on her claim for disability benefits, 

which the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) denied. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Lake was less than fully 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

FILED

SEP 27 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

credible. The ALJ found and Lake does not contest on appeal that: (1) Lake worked 

for several years with fibromyalgia and (2) the medical evidence contradicts Lake’s 

claims of totally debilitating pain. Both findings are significant and serve as 

substantial evidence supporting the ALJ’s credibility finding. See Carmickle v. 

Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 533 F.3d 1155, 1162 (9th Cir. 2008). 

Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Lake is not disabled 

because she can perform past relevant work. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(e), 416.920(e);

Lewis v. Apfel, 236 F.3d 503, 515 (9th Cir. 2001). The ALJ was not required to 

discuss every piece of evidence in the voluminous medical record. Howard ex rel. 

Wolff v. Barnhart, 341 F.3d 1006, 1012 (9th Cir. 2003). The ALJ was required to 

develop the record and interpret the medical evidence. Id. She did so here.

Finally, the ALJ properly followed all applicable procedures as required by 

20 C.F.R. §404.1520a in considering the severity of Lake’s mental impairments.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2008-0367.                 

*Date Filed:*                     November 25, 2008.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     Composite Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference, Composite Resolution 002bk, (Memo 1510), Minutes: Composite Meeting of Passenger Tariff, Coordinating Conference, (Memo 1494), Intended effective date: 1 April 2009.                 

Barabra J. Hairston, 

Supervisory Dockets Officer, Alternate Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E9-18 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Name of Subsidiary

State or otherJurisdiction inwhich organized

OwnershipAero-Motive Company




State of Michigan



100
%Advanced Interconnect, Inc.




State of Delaware



100
%Central Rubber Company




State of Illinois



100
%DW Holding, L.L.C.




State of Delaware



100
%Daniel Woodhead Company




State of Delaware



100
%Deerfield Partners C.V.




The Netherlands



100
%I.M.A. S.r.l.




Italy



100
%mPm S.r.l.




Italy



100
%WH One, LLC




State of Delaware



100
%WH Two, LLC




State of Delaware



100
%Woodhead Asia Pte. Ltd.




Singapore



100
%Woodhead Canada Limited




Province of Nova Scotia



100
%Woodhead Connectivity Limited




United Kingdom



100
%Woodhead Connectivity GmbH




Germany



100
%Woodhead Connectivity, S.A.S.




France



100
%Woodhead de Mexico S.A. de C.V.




Mexico



100
%Woodhead Finance Company




Province of Nova Scotia



100
%Woodhead France S.A.R.L.




France



100
%Woodhead International B.V.




The Netherlands



100
%Woodhead Japan Corporation




Japan



100
%Woodhead L.P.




State of Texas



100
%Woodhead Software & Electronics, S.A.S.U.  (f/k/a/ applicom International, S.A.S.)




France



100
%Woodhead Software & Electronics, GmbH  (f/k/a/ applicom International, GmbH)




Germany



100
%Euroview Services S.A.




France



37
%Micromedia S.A.




France



33
%


54

---
EX-10.2










Exhibit 10.2




PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC.




2009 LONG-TERM EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN




     The 2009 Long-Term Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) of Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. (the
“Company”) will be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the
“Committee”). The Company’s executive officers and certain key employees (together, the “Eligible
Employees”) will be eligible to participate in the Plan.




	1.	 	Equity Awards.






	 	(a)	 	If the Company’s adjusted EPS for the current fiscal year (the “Current Year EPS”) does
not exceed the Company’s adjusted EPS for the prior fiscal year (the “Prior Year EPS”) by
at least 14%, no equity awards will be granted.
	 
	 	(b)	 	If the Company’s Current Year EPS exceeds the Company’s Prior Year EPS by not less than
14%, and not more than 20%, the Company will grant stock options to the Eligible Employees
to purchase that number of shares of Common Stock which is equal to not less than 1%, and
not more than 2%, of the Company’s aggregate total of issued and outstanding shares of
Common Stock as of the grant date, the exact number to be determined in the sole discretion
of the Committee.
	 
	 	(c)	 	If the Company’s Current Year EPS exceeds the Company’s Prior Year EPS by not less than
20%, and not more than 30%, the Company will grant stock options to the Eligible Employees
to purchase that number of shares of Common Stock which is equal to not less than 2%, and
not more than 3%, of the Company’s aggregate total of issued and outstanding shares of
Common Stock as of the grant date, the exact number to be determined in the sole discretion
of the Committee.
	 
	 	(d)	 	If the Company’s Current Year EPS exceeds the Company’s Prior Year EPS by more than
30%, the Company will grant stock options to the Eligible Employees to purchase that number
of shares of Common Stock which is equal to 3% of the Company’s aggregate total of issued
and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the grant date.
	 
	 	(e)	 	At the Committee’s discretion, the Company may issue restricted stock awards in
combination with or in lieu of stock options.






	2.	 	Allocation of Equity Awards. In the event equity awards are made under the Plan, the
Committee shall meet with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer on or before March 31 of the
following fiscal year to determine the allocation of the equity awards to the Eligible
Employees.
	 
	3.	 	Vesting and Terms of Equity Awards. Any equity awards granted pursuant to the Plan
shall be issued under the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan and subject to all of the terms and
conditions of the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan. Any stock options shall vest and become
exercisable over four years, with 25% vesting on each anniversary of the date of grant over
the next four years. Any restricted stock awards shall vest over four years, with 25% vesting
on each anniversary of the date of grant over the next four years.
CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, INC.
         333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California  90071
                         (213) 486-9200
 
January 5, 1998
 
Document Control
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Re:  Capital Income Builder, Inc.
     File Nos. 2-12967 and 811-5085
                                                                             
Gentlemen:
 
     Enclosed for filing is the above-referenced Registrant's current
definitive Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.  There have been
no changes from the Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 under the
Securities Act of 1933 and Amendment No. 14 under the Investment Company Act of
1940 filed electronically on December 30, 1997.  This material is filed
pursuant to the requirements of Reg.230.497 under the Securities Act of 1933.  
   
Sincerely,
 
Vincent P. Corti
 
Enclosures
 
cc:  Mr. Frank Dalton
     Mr. Bric Barrientos 
     (Division of Investment Management)