alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 319

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 16, 2003.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2691) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year

ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. The first

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order

against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After

general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment

under the five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions

in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are

waived except as follows: page 84, line 21, through page 89;

page 90, line 4 through line 9. During consideration of the

bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the
2

•HRES 319 EH

Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill, points of order against amendments for

failure to comply with clause 2(e) of rule XXI are waived. At

the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
/Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.
Statement of registered  closed-end investment company with respect to purchases
of its own securities pursuant to Rule N-23(c)-1 during the last calendar month.

Report for the calendar month ending June 30, 1998

MFS Government Markets Income Trust
Date        Identification   Shares      Repurchase   NAV         Broker
            of Security      Repurchased Price
6/5/98      Shares of        50,000      6.5625       7.47        MLCO
            Beneficial
            Interest
6/9/98      Shares of        23,400      6.5625       7.47        MLCO
            Beneficial
            Interest
6/15/98     Shares of        100,000     6.75         7.48        MERRILL LYNCH
            Beneficial
            Interest
6/24/98     Shares of        50,000      6.6875       7.47        MERRILL LYNCH
            Beneficial
            Interest






Total Shares Repurchased:  223,400.00
Remarks: None.

MFS Government Markets Income Trust
by:  W. Thomas London
         W. Thomas London
         Treasurer
# SUMM1
[No. 54588-4-I.

Division One.

December 27, 2005.]

#### North Star Electric, Inc., *Respondent,*v. Gerald R. Kingen et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kang County, No. 03-2-25572-6, Mary Roberts, J., entered June 11, and July 14, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J., concurred in by Agid and Schindler, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              31,306,459
<CASH>                                         989,105
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       2,204,909
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,534,604
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             30,529,551
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          2,120,448
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 101,753
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 87,295
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    180,920
<COMMON>                                        21,693
<OTHER-SE>                                     830,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,534,604
<PREMIUMS>                                     836,519
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            523,917
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 561,447
<BENEFITS>                                     441,939
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    550,758
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           308,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (141,895)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (141,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (141,895)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                (10,072)
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                86,558
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                               (54,651)
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# AMANA MUTUAL FUNDS TRUST

# Proposed Resolution

**Resolved**, that theproposed Fidelity Bond coverage under the Investment Company Blanket Bond ofICI Mutual Insurance Company, to expire December 15, 2015, under which theTrust, Saturna Capital Corporation, Saturna Investment Trust and SaturnaBrokerage Services, Inc. are joint insureds, be, and hereby is, determined tobe reasonable in amount in view of all the circumstances and with considerationincluding, but not limited to, (i) the number of other parties named asinsureds, (ii) the nature of the business activities of such other parties,(iii) the amount of the joint insured bond, (iv) the amount of the premium forsuch bond, (v) the ratable allocation of the premium among all parties named asinsureds, (vi) the extent to which the share of the premium allocated to theTrust is less than the premium the Trust would have had to pay if it hadprovided and maintained a single insured bond, (vii) the value of theanticipated aggregate assets of the Trust to which any covered persons haveaccess; (viii) peer fund coverages; and (ix) the nature of the securities to beheld in the portfolios of the Trust; and be it

**Further Resolved**,that the proposed D&O/E&OInsurance of ICI Mutual Insurance Company, to expire December 15, 2015, underwhich the Trust, Saturna Capital Corporation, Saturna Trust Company, SaturnaBrokerage Services, Inc. and Saturna Investment Trust are joint insureds, be,and hereby is, determined to be reasonable and of benefit to the shareowners ofthe Trust; and be it

**Further Resolved**, that pro-rataallocation of the premiums for the Fidelity Bond and D&O/E&O Insuranceprovided by ICI Mutual Insurance Company among each of the portfolios of theTrust is approved; and be it

**Further Resolved**, that participation by the Trust in thejoint liability insurance policies is in the best interest of each of theportfolios of the Trust; and be it

**FurtherResolved,** that the participation by the Trust in the joint Fidelity Bondand D&O/E&O Insurance are fair and reasonable pro-rata to each of theportfolios of the Trust; and be it

**FurtherResolved,**that the benefits of continuing a joint fidelity bond from the ICIMutual Insurance Company, including the opportunity to obtain stable low-costinsurance coverage from ICI Mutual, justify maintaining reserve premiums andmaking commitments for additional payments, including acceptance ofrestrictions upon the withdrawal of reserve premiums.

**FurtherResolved,**that the Secretary of the Trust is appointed as the officer responsibleto file executed fidelity bonds annually as required by Rule 17g-1(h) of theInvestment Company Act, including a copy of the executed joint insured bond anda resolution by the majority of the disinterested trustees approving theamount, type, form and coverage of the bond and the portion of the premium tobe paid by each insured company.
Exhibit
32.2




CFO
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Focus Enhancements, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary L.
Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Gary L.
      WilliamsGary
      L. WilliamsChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      15, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 330 Laid on Table in House (LTH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 330

         Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2003

 Ms. Pelosi submitted the following resolution; which was laid on the 
                                 table

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas during a meeting of the Committee on Ways and Means on July 18, 2003, 
        for the consideration of the bill H.R. 1776, the chairman of the 
        Committee on Ways and Means offered an amendment in the nature of a 
        substitute;
Whereas during the reading of that amendment the chairman of the Ways and Means 
        Committee directed majority staff of the committee to ask the United 
        States Capitol Police to remove minority-party members of the committee 
        from a room of the committee during the meeting, causing the United 
        States Capitol Police thereupon to confront the minority-party members 
        of the committee; and
Whereas pending a unanimous consent request to dispense with the reading of that 
        amendment the chairman deliberately and improperly refused to recognize 
        a legitimate and timely objection by a member of the committee: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives disapproves of the 
manner in which Representative Thomas summoned the United States 
Capitol Police to evict minority party members of the Committee on Ways 
and Means from the committee library, as well as the manner in which he 
conducted the markup of legislation in the Committee on Ways and Means 
on July 18, 2003, and finds that the bill considered at that markup was 
not validly ordered reported to the House, and calls for the police 
report to be placed in the Congressional Record.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT SET FORTH IN THE REGISTRANTS'S QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED 8-2-97 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                       1,795,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 13,661,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,154,055
<PP&E>                                      12,354,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,738,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,008,942
<BONDS>                                     17,501,487
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,889
<COMMON>                                        28,562
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,185,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,738,397
<SALES>                                     40,968,311
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,968,311
<CGS>                                       29,085,986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,085,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,134,422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             853,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,105,754)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,105,754)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,105,754)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 329

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 23, 2003.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2738) to implement

the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement. The bill shall

be considered as read for amendment. The bill shall be debatable for two hours, with one hour and forty minutes equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Ways and Means and twenty

minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

Pursuant to section 151(f)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974, the

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill

to final passage without intervening motion.

SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be

in order without intervention of any point of order to consider

in the House the bill (H.R. 2739) to implement the United

States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. The bill shall be

considered as read for amendment. The bill shall be debatable
2

•HRES 329 EH

for two hours, with one hour and forty minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Ways and Means and twenty

minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

Pursuant to section 151(f)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974, the

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill

to final passage without intervening motion.

SEC. 3. During consideration of H.R. 2738 or H.R.

2739 pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to a time designated by the

Speaker.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### McKINZIE et al. v. SPRINGFIELD CITY WATER CO. SIMS v. SPRINGFIELD CITY WATER CO.

Nos. 1211, 1213.

United States District Court W. D. Missouri, S. D.

Sept. 8, 1953.

Edward Sweeney, Monett, Mo., for plaintiff.

Neale, Newman, Bradshaw, Freeman & Neale, Springfield, Mo., for defendant.

REEVES, Chief Judge.

The verified motion for costs in the above cause is not opposed. It points out reason why the court ought to use its discretion to require the plaintiff's to make a deposit or give bond to cover costs. Said motion should be sustained.

The motion for a more definite statement calls attention to the general averment of the complaint, which is as follows :

> “That during the year 1952 the defendant furnished water to a dwelling at 2111 West Chestnut in Springfield, Missouri, which was not safe and which was contaminated.”

While this, of course, is a conclusion of fact by the pleader, nevertheless such pleading has been repeatedly upheld by the courts. It is analogous to the pleading of general negligence, and the Supreme Court, in effect, interpreted its rule by appending to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., a form which made a general averment of negligence unobjectionable.

The defendant cites two cases, the one prepared by the writer, Schmidt v. Going, D.C., 25 F.Supp. 412. This opinion was prepared in 1938. Rule 12(e) then provided for a more particular statement. This provision of the rule has since been eliminated. The case of Bush v. Skidis, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 561, cannot be followed by this court. The able author of that opinion thought that the discovery rules were inadequate to furnish the information sought. This is contrary to all of the decisions of the court, and it was so conceded, by the author of the opinion. The discovery rules are efficient for the purpose sought by the defendant. It will be an easy matter to ask the plaintiffs’ attorney in what way the water was contaminated and on what particular date in 1952. Moreover, the averment is not vague and ambiguous, and, as indicated, the rule for a bill of particulars has long since been deleted from the rules. This motion, though designated a motion for a more definite statement, simply calls for particulars.

It follows that the motion for a more definite statement should be and will be overruled.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSEPH IRVIN JACKSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 72 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of June, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1

       Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer Under
                  Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

     I, Manuel B. Lopez,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of Western
Standard Corporation, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed  this Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of Western  Standard
Corporation ("issuer");

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report.

     4. I am responsible for  establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision,  to
     ensure that  material  information  relating to the issuer,  including  its
     consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to me by  others  within  those
     entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  report is being
     prepared;

          (b) Reserved;

          (c) Evaluated the  effectiveness of the issuer's  disclosure  controls
     and  procedures  and  presented  in this  report my  conclusions  about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (d)  Disclosed  in this  report  any change in the  issuer's  internal
     control over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the issuer's most
     recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to  materially   affect,  the  issuer's  internal  control  over  financial
     reporting; and

     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial  reporting,  to the issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the  issuer's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing  the  equivalent
functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     of  operation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which are
     reasonably  likely to adversely effect the registrant's  ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or
     other  employees  who  have a  significant  role in the  issuer's  internal
     control over financial reporting.

Date:    March 26, 2004

Signature: /s/ Manuel B. Lopez
           Manuel B. Lopez
Title:     Chief Executive and Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1752]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 27, 2009 / 
Notices

[[Page 4731]]



AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION


Board of Directors Meeting

    Meeting: African Development Foundation, Board of Directors 
Meeting.
    Time: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Place: African Development Foundation, Conference Room, 1400 I 
Street, NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005.
    Dates: Tuesday, February 3, 2009.
    Status:
    1. Open session, Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 9 a.m. to 12:05 p.m.; 
and
    2. Executive session, Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 12:10 p.m. to 1 
p.m.
    Due to security requirements and limited seating, all individuals 
wishing to attend the open session of the meeting must notify Doris 
Martin, General Counsel, at (202) 673-3916 or Michele M. Rivard at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#036e716a756271674376706267652d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d607f647b6c7f694d787e6c696b236a627b">[email protected]</span></a> of your request to attend by 4 p.m. on Friday, 
January 30, 2009.

Lloyd O. Pierson,
President.
 [FR Doc. E9-1752 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6117-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>