alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 150 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 150

Expressing the support of the House of Representatives for the members 
   of the Armed Forces of the United States called upon to engage in 
                   possible military action in Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2003

    Mr. Ryun of Kansas (for himself and Mr. Becerra) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the support of the House of Representatives for the members 
   of the Armed Forces of the United States called upon to engage in 
                   possible military action in Iraq.

Whereas 250,000 members of the Armed Forces of the United States are currently 
        deployed in and near the Persian Gulf region;
Whereas these American military personnel have been separated from their 
        families in support of a possible conflict in Iraq;
Whereas war against Iraq appears imminent; and
Whereas although the American people have differences in opinion over the policy 
        of engagement in Iraq, the American people strongly support the Nation's 
        military personnel, both active and reserve, who have been called into 
        possible action: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses its strong 
support for the members of the Armed Forces of the United States called 
upon to engage in possible military action in Iraq.
                                 <all>
```
# NYC_1418_FBPrivCon

Fatal occupational injuries to foreign born workers in the private construction industry in New York City, 2014-18 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries to foreign born workers in the private construction industry in New York City, 2014-18		

Fatal occupational injuries to foreign born workers in the private construction industry in New York City, 2014-18 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries to foreign born workers in the private construction industry in New York City, 2014-18		

Page &P
Exhibit 32

                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial officer of Peoples  Bancorporation,  Inc., each hereby certifies that,
to the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-Q of the issuer fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

November 9, 2005

                                                      /s/ R. Riggie Ridgeway
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      R. Riggie Ridgeway
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                                      /s/ Robert E. Dye, Jr.
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Robert E. Dye, Jr.
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 255 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          June 3, 2003.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the joint 
resolution (H.J. Res. 4) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the 
United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of 
the flag of the United States. The joint resolution shall be considered as read 
for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the joint resolution equally divided 
and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
the Judiciary; (2) an amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by 
Representative Conyers of Michigan or his designee, which shall be considered as 
read and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with 
or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Abatement Order filed July 3, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00767

- CR

____________ CURTIS ELL WHITE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 183rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1372505



### ABATEMENT ORDER
The trial court failed to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement. Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure requires the trial court to make written fact findings and conclusions of law as to whether a challenged statement was made voluntarily, even if appellant did not request th em or object to their absence. Tex. Code Crim.
Proc. Ann. art. 38.22 ' 6 ; Urias v. State , 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 ( Tex. Crim. App. 2004). The statute is mandatory and the proper procedure to correct the error is toabate the appeal and direct the trial court to make the requ ired findings and

conclusions. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Wicker v. State , 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (T ex. Crim. App. 1987).
Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the c lerk of this
Court on or before August 4, 2014

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations ar e filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
# Mass Layoff Statistics Latest Numbers

Latest Numbers for Mass Layoff Statistics, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

- Mass Layoff Statistics Latest Numbers Seasonally Adjusted:															           Total Mass Layoff Events					  in  					Historical Data								           Change in Total Mass Layoff Events					  in  					Historical Data								           Total Mass Layoff Initial Claimants					  in  					Historical Data								           Change in Total Mass Layoff Initial Claimants					  in  					Historical Data								           Private Nonfarm Mass Layoff Events					  in  					Historical Data								           Change in Private Nonfarm Mass Layoff Events					  in  					Historical Data								           Private Nonfarm Mass Layoff Initial Claimants					  in  					Historical Data								           Change in Private Nonfarm Mass Layoff Initial Claimants					  in  					Historical Data																				Not Seasonally Adjusted:															           Private Nonfarm Extended Mass Layoff Events					  in  					Historical Data								           4-Quarter Change in Private Nonfarm Extended Mass Layoff Events					  since  -1					Historical Data								           Private Nonfarm Extended Mass Layoff Separations					  in  					Historical Data								           4-Quarter Change in Private Nonfarm Extended Mass Layoff Separations					  since  -1					Historical Data
Instrument of Transfer - Style Technology and Capital Ally



 Exhibit 10.56 
 

 INSTRUMENT OF TRANSFER

 
  

			
	 NAME OF COMPANY:
	  	 Pypo Digital Company Limited
 (incorporated in
the Cayman Islands with limited liability)


  

			
	I/We, the Transferor,	  	Style Technology Development Limited
	of:	  	Room 2702, Lucky Commercial Centre,
		  	103-109 Des Voeux Road West, Hong Kong.

  

			
	in consideration of:	  	the issue and allotment of 4,900 shares with a par value of US$1.00 each in the capital of Capital Ally Investments Limited, credited as fully paid, to Style Technology Development Limited


  

			
	do hereby transfer to Transferee:	  	Capital Ally Investments Limited
	Occupation/Description:	  	Corporation
	of:	  	P.O. Box 957, Offshore Incorporations Centre,
		  	Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands.

 (the “Transferee”) do hereby transfer to the Transferee the 91,350,000 Shares of par value of
US$0.0001 each, standing in my/our name in the Register of the above company to hold unto the Transferee, his executors, administrators or assigns, subject to the several conditions upon which I/we hold the same at the time of execution hereof.

 I/We, the Transferee, do hereby agree to take the said Share(s) subject to the same conditions. 
 Dated:-28 December 2007 
  

							
	Witness to signature of Transferor	 		 	
				
	Name:	 		 		 	
				
	Address:	 		 		 	
		 		 		 	
		 		 		 	
			
	 	 		 	/s/
	Signature of Witness	 		 	 Signature of Transferor
 for and on behalf of
Style Technology Development Limited

	Witness to signature of Transferee	 		 	
				
	Name:	 		 		 	
				
	Address:	 		 		 	
		 		 		 	
		 		 		 	
			
	 	 		 	/s/ KAM Yuen
	Signature of Witness	 		 	 Signature of transferee
 for and on behalf of
Capital Ally Investments Limited
[No. 54708-9-I.

Division One.

December 12, 2005.]

#### Imae Oaksford, *Appellant,*v. First Data Merchant Services Corporation et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-2-28938-0, Steven C. Gonzalez, J., entered July 6, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Cox, C.J., and Becker, J.
No. 1257.

#### Buckley *v.*New York.

June 3, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, 4th Department, of New York, denied.
#### REESE v. PENNSYLVANIA R. R.

Civ. A. No. 261.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

April 8, 1953.

Smith, Maine, Whitsett & Lee, Clear-field, Pa., for plaintiff.

S. Y. Rossiter, Erie, Pa., for defendant.

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

In this proceeding the plaintiff claims a right to recover damages based on negligence in the failure of the. defendant to deliver a power shovel and boom at its shipping destination within a reasonable time after delivery to the railroad. ’ That as a result of the negligent conduct of the defendant plaintiff lost the use of said shovel and was unable to fulfill his contractual obligations.

The defendant has filed a motion for a more definite statement with respect to the damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligent conduct of the defendant.

*154The paragraph pleading the damages is as follows:

> “As a result of defendant’s negligence and its failure to deliver the shovel within a reasonable time and within the time specified plaintiff lost the use of said shovel and was unable to fulfill his contractual obligations which he had made requiring the use of the shovel from June 10 to July 16, 1952, and was damaged in the amount of Twenty Thousand ($20,000.00) Dollars.”

Defendant states that it cannot properly prepare its responsive pleading for the reason that the allegation as to damages is vague and indefinite, without an itemization by the plaintiff as to the basis for the amount of damages claimed of $20,000.

This court has consistently denied motions for a more definite statement as to the precise nature of damages sustained in an action based on negligence.

Rule 8(a) and (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., requires short, plain and concise pleadings. Form 9 in the Appendix of Forms attached to the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., does not suggest setting forth in detail an itemization of damages.

No useful purpose could be gained in setting this matter for argument or hearing since the rule in this district and circuit provides that if the defendant needs further information to prepare his defense, it is necessary to secure this information under the discovery procedure as provided' by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, such as depositions or interrogatories without burdening the pleadings. Lincoln v. Herr, D.C.W.D.Pa., 6 F.R.D. 209; Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 3 Cir., 103 F.2d 843.

The motion for a more definite statement is, therefore, refused and an appropriate Order is entered.
SECOND AMENDMENT 


DATED AS OF FEBRUARY 19, 2013


TO THE MARKETING AGENT AGREEMENT


DATED AS OF JUNE 8, 2009, AS AMENDED
JULY 30, 2012


 


AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”)
dated as of February 19, 2013 between ALPS DISTRIBUTORS, INC. (“ALPS”), UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUNDS LLC
and UNITED STATES SHORT OIL FUND, LP (“USSO”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


The parties have previously entered into
that certain Marketing Agent Agreement dated as of June 8, 2009, as amended July 30, 2012 (the “Agreement”).  The
parties have agreed to amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual agreements herein contained, ALPS, USCF and USSO hereby acknowledge and agree as follows:


 


1.   Amendment
to the Agreement.  Upon execution of this Amendment by ALPS, USCF and USSO, the Agreement shall be hereby amended
as follows:


 


(a)   Section 4.3 of the
Agreement, “Marketing Agent Fee” shall be amended by adding the following:


 


In no event will the Marketing Agent Fee exceed 10% of the gross
proceeds of the Fund’s offering.


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused
this Amendment to be executed by their respective officers or authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.


 


	UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUNDS LLC
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Howard Mah	 	 
	 	Name: Howard Mah
	 	Title: Management Director
	 	 	 	 	 
	UNITED STATES SHORT OIL FUND, LP
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By: United States Commodity Funds LLC, as General Partner
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Howard Mah	 	 
	 	 	Name: Howard Mah	 	 
	 	 	Title: Management Director	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	ALPS DISTRIBUTORS, INC
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Thomas A. Carter	 	 
	 	Name: Thomas A. Carter
	 	Title: President


 




    	2
#### In re ALDEN ELECTRIC CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

April 14, 1903.)

No. 986.

1. Bankruptcy—Dismissal of Appeal—Failure to File Transcript.

Where the record on appeal from an order allowing a claim is not filed within the time allowed by law, nor any application made for an extension of the time, the appeal will be dismissed.

¶ 1. Appeal and review in bankruptcy cases, see note to In re Eggert, 43 C. C. A. 9.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, in Bankruptcy.

Motion by trustee in bankruptcy of the Illinois Insulated Wire Company, the appellee, to dismiss the appeal, and motion by the Equitable Trust Company, trustee of the Alden Electric Company, bankrupt, for enlargement of time in which to file transcript of record.

Wm. K. Lowry, for appellant.

E. W. Moore, for appellee.

Before JENKINS, GROSSCUP, and BAKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the District Court, made January 21, 1903, allowing the claim of the appellee *416against the estate of the bankrupt. Within io days from the order of allowance a petition for appeal was filed by the trustee of the bank-' rupt. On February 20th an order was entered by the District Court nunc pro tunc, as of January 31st, allowing the appeal. No return has been filed in this court, the cause being docketed upon a certificate of the clerk of the court below stating the facts of the allowance of the -claim and of the petition for appeal and its allowance by the court. The return should have been filed in this court by the 2d day of March, 1903, but no such return was made, and no application was made to any judge of this court for an enlargement of the time to make that return, until this motion now presented, filed in this court more than 40 days after the return should have been filed.

It has been held by this court in West v. Irwin, 54 Fed. 419, 4 C. C. A. 401, that an order extending the time for filing the record on appeal, made after- the time had expired, is ineffective. The motion to dismiss was filed before the motion for an extension of time and before the filing of any return, and within the decision cited we are constrained to dismiss this appeal.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GHULAM MOHAMMED NASIM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR88-378-HM, CA-96-777-S)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: March 24, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nasim, Nos. CR88-378-HM; CA-96-777-S (D. Md. May 22, 1996). Appellant's motion

to remand to the district court is denied. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 21 TO FORM 10-K OF
WESCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
 WESCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 SUBSIDIARIES
 PERCENTAGEOWNED BY
    
    STATE OFNAME OF SUBSIDIARY
    
    REGISTRANT
    
    INCORPORATONWesco Holdings Midwest, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    NebraskaWesco-Financial Insurance Company
    
    
    100
    %
    
    NebraskaKansas Bankers Surety Company
    
    
    100
    %
    
    KansasCORT Business Services Corporation
    
    
    100
    %
    
    DelawarePrecision Steel Warehouse, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    IllinoisPrecision Steel Warehouse, Inc.,Charlotte Service Center
    
    
    100
    %
    
    DelawarePrecision Brand Products
    
    
    100
    %
    
    DelawareMS Property Company
    
    
    100
    %
    
    California
Capital Income Builder, Inc.
                             333 South Hope Street
                       Los Angeles, California 90071-1406
                              Phone (213) 486 9200


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



JAMES B. LOVELACE, Chairman and PEO, and SHERYL F. JOHNSON, Treasurer of Capital
Income  Builder,  Inc.  (the  "Registrant"),  each  certify  to the  best of his
knowledge that:

1)   The Registrant's periodic report on Form N-CSR for the period ended October
     31, 2003 (the "Form N-CSR") fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)   The  information  contained  in the  Form  N-CSR  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.


Chief Executive Officer                  Chief Financial Officer

CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, INC.             CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, INC.


/s/ James B. Lovelace                     /s/ Sheryl F. Johnson
----------------------------             -----------------------------
James B. Lovelace, Chairman              Sheryl F. Johnson, Treasurer

Date: January 8, 2004                    Date: January 8, 2004


A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, INC. and
will be retained by CAPITAL INCOME BUILDER, INC. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") or its staff upon request.

This  certification  is being furnished to the Commission  solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form N-CSR filed with
the Commission.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 337 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 337

Congratulating Ben Curtis on his outstanding accomplishment in winning 
                 the 2003 British Open golf tournament.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2003

Mr. Ryan of Ohio submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating Ben Curtis on his outstanding accomplishment in winning 
                 the 2003 British Open golf tournament.

Whereas Ben Curtis was a relatively unknown golfer before he arrived in Britain 
        for his first major tournament, the 2003 British Open, which was also 
        his first tournament on a links course;
Whereas Mr. Curtis's win at the 2003 British Open was the most unexpected and 
        unpredictable in the recent history of the 143-year-old event;
Whereas the mental toughness and physical ability displayed by Mr. Curtis are 
        the hallmarks of a true champion;
Whereas Mr. Curtis became the first golfer since 1913 to win a major tournament 
        on his first attempt;
Whereas Mr. Curtis made his family, the citizens of Ohio, and our Nation proud 
        with his outstanding performance; and
Whereas it is appropriate to recognize the important role that athletic events 
        play in American life: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Ben 
Curtis on his outstanding accomplishment in winning the 2003 British 
Open golf tournament.
                                 <all>
```