alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of uWink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter F. Wilkniss,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.



November 29, 2006                                By: /s/ Peter F. Wilkniss
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  Peter F. Wilkniss
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  Chief Accounting Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60617 Summary Calendar

WEI TIAN LUO,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A 73 723 647

- - - - - - - - - - June 10, 1998 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Wei Tian Luo petitions for review of the decision of the Board

of Immigration Appeals that dismissed his appeal from the

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and

for a withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the record and

the briefs and determine that the Board’s decision is supported by

substantial evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194,

197 (5th Cir. 1996). The petition for review is DENIED.No. -2-
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 264 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 23, 2003.
Whereas, on the evening of May 21, 2003, a devastating and deadly earthquake of 
        a magnitude of 6.8 on the Richter scale with a depth of 6 miles struck 
        northern Algeria, killing more than 2,260 people, injuring more than 
        10,000, and leaving more than 200,000 homeless;
Whereas the earthquake of May 21, 2003, has left thousands of buildings in ruins 
        and has severely disrupted health services, water supply lines, 
        electricity, and telecommunications in Algeria and affected cities;
Whereas severe aftershocks with magnitudes greater than 4.0 have continued to 
        terrify the people of Algeria and hamper rescue efforts;
Whereas the strength, courage, and determination of the Government and people of 
        Algeria has been displayed since the earthquake;
Whereas the people of the United States and Algeria share strong friendship and 
        mutual respect;
Whereas the United States airlifted to the earthquake-affected population 17,000 
        blankets, 1800 tents, electrical equipment, water purification kits, and 
        3 medical supply kits that will benefit 10,000 people over 3 months;
Whereas the United States has released $50,000 to the Algerian Red Crescent 
        Society for emergency relief supplies; and
Whereas the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) launched an emergency appeal 
        for humanitarian and relief assistance to address the devastation caused 
        by the powerful earthquake: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its deepest sympathies to the people of Algeria and 
        particularly to the families of the victims and the survivors for the 
        tragic losses suffered as a result of the earthquake of May 21, 2003;
            (2) expresses its support for the people and to the Government of 
        Algeria as they continue their efforts to rebuild their cities and their 
        lives;
            (3) expresses support for humanitarian assistance provided by the 
        United States Agency for International Development and other American 
        and international relief organizations;
            (4) recognizes the important role that is being played by the United 
        States and the international community in providing assistance to 
        alleviate the suffering of the people of Algeria; and
            (5) encourages a continued commitment by the United States and other 
        countries and international organizations to the rebuilding of the 
        earthquake-affected areas in Algeria.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 10.10












Amended and Restated Board Compensation Program


for Outside Directors


Effective May 19, 2011







Annual Retainers








	
·

	
Outside Directors each receive an annual cash retainer of $35,000








	
·

	
Lead Director receives an additional annual cash retainer of $30,000








	
·

	
Audit Committee chair receives an additional annual cash retainer of $20,000








	
·

	
Compensation, Scientific Review, Strategic Operations and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chairs receive an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000








	
·

	
Audit Committee members (other than the chair) receive an additional annual cash retainer of $5,000








	
·

	
Compensation, Scientific Review, Strategic Operations and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members (other than the chair) receive an additional annual cash retainer of $3,000












Meeting Fees








	
·

	
Board meeting fees of $2,000 for in-person attendance, $1,500 for telephonic attendance








	
·

	
Committee meeting fees of:








	
o

	
$2,000 for in-person attendance of all Committee meetings








	
o

	
$1,500 for telephonic attendance of Audit Committee meetings








	
o

	
$1,000 for telephonic attendance of Compensation, Scientific Review, Strategic Operations and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meetings












Equity awards as follows:







	
 

	
No. of Stock Options

	
No. of RSU's

	
Total Shares


	
Initial Election Award

	
10,800

	
5,400

	
16,200


	
Annual Award

	
7,200

	
3,600

	
10,800










 


 For purposes of this Program:








	
1.

	
Outside Director shall mean any individual that is not an Inside Director and meets the definition of "outside director" as it may be amended from time to time under Section 162(m) the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the rules and regulation thereunder;








	
2.

	
Lead Director shall mean the Independent Director selected by a majority of the Independent Directors, pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines.








	
3.

	
Inside Director shall mean any individual who is also an officer or employee of the Corporation or any of its affiliates.








	
4.

	
Independent Director shall mean any individual who qualifies as an "independent director," pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines.












         The determination of whether or not an individual is an Outside Director, Inside Director or Independent Director (and in the case of an Outside Director whether or not the grant of an option was necessary to attract such individual to join the Board) shall be made by the Board of Directors in its sole 


         and absolute discretion at any time prior or subsequent to the date on which the individual is appointed or elected to the Board of Directors.












Approved By Board of Directors


May 19, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
   
                      
<MULTIPLIER>      1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                1575
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                        45281
<ALLOWANCES>                         (1438)
<INVENTORY>                          29512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     82474
<PP&E>                               15300
<DEPRECIATION>                       (8283)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      127477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                52841
<BONDS>                                  0      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0      
<PREFERRED>                              0      
<COMMON>                             18001
<OTHER-SE>                           40521          
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        127477          
<SALES>                             172386          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    172661          
<CGS>                               102909          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       160844          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     766      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      11051      
<INCOME-TAX>                          3955      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   7096      
<DISCONTINUED>                           0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0      
<CHANGES>                                0      
<NET-INCOME>                          7096      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .79      
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .75      
        


</TABLE>
EX-10.18



 Exhibit 10.18 
 May 14, 2012 
 K. Tucker Andersen 
 61 Above All Road 
 Warren, CT 06754 
 Dear Mr. Andersen, 
 In summary of our telephone conversation we had on, Thursday,
May 10, 2012, this is the formal notification that you have agreed to extend the due date of the Promissory Note with Milestone Scientific Inc. originally dated December 24, 2008 for four hundred fifty thousand dollars ($450,000) until
January 3, 2014. All other terms and conditions remain the same as included in the original agreement. 
 Please sign below acknowledging
this change. 
 Thank you very much for your continued support of Milestone Scientific Inc. 

 

	
	Best regards,
	
	/s/ Joseph D’Agostino
	Joseph D’Agostino
	Chief Financial Officer

  

	
	/s/ K. Tucker Andersen
	K. Tucker Andersen

 May 14, 2012 
 Date
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Authentidate Holding Corp. (the company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, being, OConnell Benjamin, President of the company, and William A. Marshall, Chief Financial Officer of the company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the company.



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 12, 2009 |  |  |  |                        
|                         |  | 
|/s/ OConnell Benjamin   |  |  |  | /s/ William A. Marshall
|President                |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
                This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted
                from the  consolidated  balance sheet of  Envirosource,  Inc. at
                December  31,  1999,  and from  the  consolidated  statement  of
                operations of Envirosource, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
                1999,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such
                financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                    2,125
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            33,725
<ALLOWANCES>                                896
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         53,772
<PP&E>                                  254,478
<DEPRECIATION>                          151,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          278,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    49,811
<BONDS>                                 278,666
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                    291
<OTHER-SE>                              (85,854)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            278,257
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        211,975
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           142,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        118,253
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             36
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       30,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (94,799)
<INCOME-TAX>                                952
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (95,751)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (95,751)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (16.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (16.47)



</TABLE>
f8k032613ex10i_oxysure.htm


 





Exhibit 10.1














March 18, 2013







Mr. Jeremy M. Jones


19712 MacArthur Blvd, #230


Irvine, CA 92612







Dear Jerry:







I am pleased to formalize our invitation for you to serve on the Board of Directors of OxySure Systems, Inc. (OTCQB: OXYS) (the “Company” or “OxySure”). We look forward to working with you and we are excited to be able to have access to your guidance and counsel, experience and expertise in the healthcare industry and in general business.







As discussed, we would like to agree on an initial term of service of two (2) years, after which our agreement becomes renewable annually by mutual written consent. We expect that we will work together on multiple fronts, as is customary in Board oversight of public companies, including committee service, board meetings, business development activities and financing activities.







During the first year of Board service, OxySure agrees to provide compensation as to a total of 78,000 shares of the restricted common stock of OXYS, issued quarterly in advance. During the second year of Board service, OxySure agrees to provide compensation as to: (i) a total of 60,000 shares of the restricted common stock of OXYS, issued quarterly in advance; and (ii) a total of $60,000 in cash, payable on terms we will mutually agree upon.







Naturally, as Board members we are all subject to requirements related to confidentiality, federal and state securities laws, Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations, and U.S. and international laws and regulations in general.







Jerry, thanks again for agreeing to be on our team, and welcome aboard.







Very sincerely







/s/ Julian T. Ross                              


Julian T. Ross


Chief Executive Officer







Date: March 26, 2013












Agreed and Accepted:        /s/ Jeremy M. Jones                                     


                                                Jeremy M. Jones


 


Date: April 1, 2013                                        







 



OxySure Systems, Inc.


10880 John W. Elliott Drive #600, Frisco, TX 75033


1-888-7OXYSURE  |  (+1) 972-294-6450 |  Fax (+1) -972-294-6501


www.oxysure.com
# Fatal contact SOC 49302, 2018

Fatal occupational injuries due to contact with objects or equipment to Automotive Technicians and Repairers (SOC 49302), 2018 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries due to contact with objects or equipment to Automotive Technicians and Repairers (SOC 49302), 2018		

Fatal occupational injuries due to contact with objects or equipment to Automotive Technicians and Repairers (SOC 49302), 2018 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries due to contact with objects or equipment to Automotive Technicians and Repairers (SOC 49302), 2018		

Page &P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwain U. GAINES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-3130.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 21, 2013.

Decided Feb. 25, 2013.

Colin S. Bruce, Office of the United States Attorney, Urbana, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Elisabeth R. Pollock, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Urbana, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Dwain Gaines, Clinton, IL, pro se.

Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge and DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at the home of Dwain Gaines, a felon, and found 205 grams of crack cocaine and a handgun. Gaines confessed to cooking and selling crack. He pleaded guilty to possession -with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a), possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(i), and possession of a firearm by a felon, *id.*§ 922(g)(1). Because of the drug quantity and his prior convictions for felony drug offenses, Gaines faced a statutory minimum of 10 years’ imprisonment on the drug count. *See*21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(l)(B)(iii). He also faced a consecutive term of at least 5 years for the § 924(c) violation. *See*18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)®. The district court calculated a guidelines range of 262 to 327 months on the drug count and added 60 more for the § 924(c), *see*U.S.S.G. § 4Bl.l(c)(2)(A), for an overall range of 322 to 387 months. Gaines conceded that the range was correctly calculated, and the court imposed a total sentence of 300 months.

Gaines filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed counsel believes that the appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw. *See Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gaines has not responded to his lawyer’s submission, *see*Cir. R. 51(b), but he did tell counsel not to contest his guilty pleas. Thus, counsel properly forgoes discussing the adequacy of the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the pleas. *See United States v. Konczak,*683 F.3d 348, 349 (7th Cir.2012); *United States v. Knox,*287 F.3d 667, 671-72 (7th Cir.2002). We limit our review to the potential issue identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief. *See United States v. Schuh,*289 F.3d 968, 973-74 (7th Cir.2002).

Counsel discusses only one potential issue: whether Gaines could challenge his overall prison sentence as unreasonably high. The lawyer has not identified any reason to set aside the presumption of reasonableness applicable to sentences below the guidelines range. *See United States v. Curtis,*645 F.3d 937, 943 (7th Cir.2011); *United States v. Liddell,*543 *582F.3d 877, 885 (7th Cir.2008). The district court discussed how the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) apply to Gaines’ illness, including his history of learning disabilities and recently diagnosed cocaine-induced psychotic disorder. The court concluded that a lower sentence would not adequately represent the seriousness of his crimes and his criminal history, which includes two convictions for aggravated battery.

Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and DISMISS the appeal.
#### Adlay WILLIAMS et al., Plaintiffs, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.

No. 12177.

United States District Court S. D. Texas, Houston Division.

June 4, 1959.

Musick, Musick & Heath (Ted Musick), Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs.

McGregor, Sewell & Junell (Ben G. Sewell), Houston, Tex., for defendant.

INGRAHAM, District Judge.

The case is now before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a First Amended Complaint, which defendant contends should be denied. Plaintiffs seek to join as additional defendants J. W. Brannon and H. E. Garrett, who are alleged to be residents of Texas and to have been the engineer and conductor, respectively, of defendant railroad company’s freight train involved in the collision made the basis of this action.

This cause was removed from the state court, where it was originally filed, to this court on the ground of diversity of citizenship between plaintiffs, who are surviving relatives of the deceased Her-vine Williams and residents of Texas, and defendant, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Missouri corporation. Plaintiffs’ earlier motion to remand to the state court and demand for jury trial in this court were denied.

Whether or not Brannon and Garrett are necessary parties and whether or not any cause of action against them would be barred by the statute of limitations, it is sufficient grounds for denial of plaintiffs’ motion that the effect of joinder of these additional parties, alleged to be residents of Texas, would be to destroy the original diversity of citizenship between the parties. Rule 19(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. states, “When persons who are not indispensable, but who ought to be parties if complete relief is to be accorded between those already parties, have not been made parties and are subject to the jurisdiction of the court as to both service of process and venue *and can be made parties without depriving the court of jurisdiction of the parties before it,*the court shall order them summoned to appear in the action.” (Emphasis supplied) The addition of Brannon and Garrett as defendants could result in depriving this court of jurisdiction of the *15parties before it, if plaintiffs could later contend that the original diversity of citizenship thereby had been destroyed. Thus these additional parties cannot be joined, and plaintiffs’ motion will be denied.

The clerk will notify counsel to draft and submit appropriate order.
# laucnty22

&8Page &P of &N