alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40211 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CAROLYNN ALEXANDRA PEREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13

- CR

- 564

- 1

Before D ENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carolynn Alexandra
Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez h a s not filed a respo nse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40211 Document: 00513804363 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016No. 16

- 40211

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40211 Document: 00513804363 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
---

Exhibit 32.2








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Erin D. Pickens, as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 10, 2009











/s/ Erin D. Pickens


Erin D. Pickens


Senior Vice President &


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 312 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          July 9, 2003.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2660) making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and 
Human Services, and Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. All points of 
order against provisions in the bill are waived except section 217(b). Where 
points of order are waived against part of a section, points of order against a 
provision in another part of such section may be made only against such 
provision and not against the entire section. During consideration of the bill 
for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 
shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 
been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 
and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 284 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 19, 2003.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Neugebauer.
    Committee on Resources: Mr. Neugebauer.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Neugebauer.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Mccotter.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00303

- CR

JOHN LAZO v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 11

- CR

- 0573

- E

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

a ppeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 30, 2014
[No. 22945-9-III.

Division Three.

October 18, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Haider Abdulridha Al-Khaledy, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 03-1-00606-1, Vic L. VanderSchoor, J., entered April 7, 2004. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, J., concurred in by Sweeney, A.C.J., and Schultheis, J.
Order filed, May 14, 2015

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The



## First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01

- 15

- 00339

- CR

STEVEN WAYNE FISHER , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal fr om the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 1428579



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 4, 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1.

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has

not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we

issue the following order.We order Marcia Barnett , the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the

record in this appeal , if any, within 30 days of th e date of this order

.

/s/ Jan Bland

Acting individually
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT






Board of Directors and Stockholders
Slippery Rock Financial Corporation

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Slippery Rock
Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of June 30, 2000, and the related
consolidated statement of income for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2000 and 1999, and the consolidated statement cash flows for the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, and the consolidated
statement of changes in stockholders' equity for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial
and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report
dated February 4, 2000 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.




Wexford, PA
August 9, 2000

S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
1000 Stonewood Drive
Suite 200
Wexford, PA  15090
Phone: 724-934-0344
Facsimile: 724-934-0345
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL KEITH MILES , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2200

[ March 22, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox , Judge; L.T. Case No. 31

- 2016

- CF

000116

- A

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and James W. McIntire, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant At torney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , T AYLOR and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Soyo Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period  ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the  undersigned,  Ming
Tung Chok,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13a-14(b) or
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Ming Tung Chok
-----------------------
Ming Tung Chok
Chief Executive Officer
April __, 2004
CERTIFICATION OF
                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with the  accompanying  Yearly  Report on Form  10-KSB of Burnam
Management,  Inc. for the year ending  February 28,  2003,  I, Rick  Plotnikoff,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of Segway V Corp.  hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending February 28,
          2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for
          the year ended February 28, 2003, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Burnam
          Management, Inc.

Dated:    January 16, 2004

Burnam Management, Inc.


By:  /s/ Rick Plotnikoff
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Written Description of Oral Agreement - Pypo Beijing and Beijing JingJing



 Exhibit 10.64 
 Written description of oral agreement between Beijing Pypo Technology Group Company 
 Limited and
Beijing JingJing Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. 
 In September 2008, Beijing Pypo Technology Group Company Limited, or Pypo Beijing, made
cash advances of approximately $1.5 million to Beijing JingJing Medical Equipment Co., Ltd, a company controlled by Golden Meditech, to meet its short-term working capital needs. These advances were unsecured, interest-free obligations payable on
demand.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 249 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 48
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 249

                          [Report No. 108-124]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2003

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of May 22, 2003, providing 
for consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R. 2) to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to section 201 of the concurrent resolution on 
the budget for fiscal year 2004, any amendment thereto, any conference 
report thereon, or any amendment reported in disagreement from a 
conference thereon.

                                                  House Calendar No. 48

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 249

                          [Report No. 108-124]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 21, 2003

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 22

- 13736

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
DAWN M. WHITE, PATRICK J. WHITE,
Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:21

- cv

- 00667

- RAH

- CWB USCA11 Case: 22-13736 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2023 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 22

- 13736

____________________
Before W ILLIAM P RYOR , Chief Judge, and W ILSON and L UCK , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Patrick White , as purported pro se “ representative ” of his wife, Dawn, appeal s the dismissal of he r amended complaint alleging medical malpractice under the Federal Tort Claims Act committed a t the Maxwell Air Force Base

. The district court ruled that Patrick could not represent Dawn without being admitted to practice law

. And t he district court dismissed Dawn’s complaint because, even though she appeared to have signed it , her c omplaint

was un timely. Because Patrick also cannot represent his wife on appeal, w e dismiss this appeal

. Patrick, who is not an attorney , purported to sue on behalf of his wife and to represent her legal interests. Federal law allows parties in federal cases to “plead a nd conduct their own cases personally or by counsel. ” 28 U.S.C. § 1654. But the right to appear pro

se extends to parties conducting “their own cases,” not to persons representing the interests of others. See Devine v. Indian River Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 121 F.3d 576, 581 (11th Cir. 1997) (determining that, while Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c) allows a parent to sue on behalf of their minor child, the rule does not allow a non

- attorney parent to function as legal counsel f or the child), overruled in part on other grounds by Winkelman ex rel. Winkelman v. Parma City Sch. Dist. , 550 U.S. 516, 535 (2007). USCA11 Case: 22-13736 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2023 Page: 2 of 322

- 13736 Opinion of the Court 3
We cannot entertain this appeal. Because Patrick was not permitted to represent Dawn’s legal interests and disclaimed any intent to sue on his own behalf
, he could not p articipate in the action

. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654; Devine , 121 F.3d at 581. A lthough Dawn and Patrick both signed the notice of appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(A) , (c)(2) , the unsigned opening brief s tat es th at it was submitted only by Patrick as Dawn’s “Pro Se Representative” and reiterates that he “has no right to a claim nor is it his intent to be recognized” as a p arty . So we cann ot consider the legal arguments he seek s to raise on her behalf.

We DISMISS this appeal

. USCA11 Case: 22-13736 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2023 Page: 3 of 3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey Antoine TABOR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7458.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.

Corey Antoine Tabor, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. O’Malley, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Corey Antoine Tabor appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v.*
      *256
      *Tabor,*No. 5:03-cr-00012-RLV-CH-5 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of K.H.G. and * From the 1st Multicounty Court at Law

K.L.H., children of Mitchell County,

 Trial Court No. CCL17455.

No. 11-22-00042-CV * June 9, 2022

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal and 

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against Appellant.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          ELITE INFORMATION GROUP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three months ended
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         March 31,      March 31,
                                                           2000            1999
                                                         ----------   ----------
<S>                                                       <C>         <C>
Net income from continuing operations                     $     437   $      67
Loss from discontinued operations                                           (49)
                                                          ---------   ---------
Net income                                                $     437   $      18
                                                          =========   =========
Basic earnings per share:
    Weighted average common shares outstanding                8,492       8,261
                                                          =========   =========
    Net income from continuing operations                 $    0.05   $    0.01
    Loss from discontinued operations                                     (0.01)
                                                          ---------   ---------
    Net income per common share                           $    0.05   $    0.00
                                                          =========   =========
Diluted earnings per share:
    Weighted average common shares outstanding                8,492       8,261
    Addition from assumed exercise of stock options             261         139
                                                          ---------   ---------
    Weighted average common and common equivalent
        shares outstanding                                    8,753       8,400
                                                          =========   =========

    Net income from continuing operations                 $    0.05   $    0.01
    Loss from discontinued operations                                     (0.01)
                                                          ---------   ---------
    Net income per common and common equivalent share     $    0.05   $    0.00
                                                          =========   =========
</TABLE>


                                       13
##### 





| |  | EXHIBIT 99.2
| |  | ------------

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Annual Report of The Washington Post Company (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 29, 2002 (the Report),
I, John B. Morse, Jr., Vice PresidentFinance (chief financial officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                     |  |                       
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Date: March 14, 2003 |  | /s/ John B. Morse, Jr.
|                     |  |                       
|                     |  | John B. Morse, Jr.,   
|                     |  | Vice PresidentFinance