alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1,000
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                          1,204
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  37,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      497
<INVENTORY>                                                    40,647
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               87,106
<PP&E>                                                         86,229
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 15,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                189,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          38,219
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       28,026
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  189,124
<SALES>                                                        67,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               67,995
<CGS>                                                          59,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  65,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              2,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   (99)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       15
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (114)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (114)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1







 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


March 14, 2013


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, New York Municipal Portfolio of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 4


Dear Sirs:




The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, New York Municipal Portfolio of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 4 set forth above (the
“Trust”). We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on March 14, 2013, in accordance with the valuation method
set forth in the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-186382) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.







Very truly yours,


 


/s/
GERARDO CIPRIANO                             


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
##### 



Exhibit 13.2
 Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  1.
    
    I, Lawrence C.P. Li, am the Director, Finance, of Kowloon-Canton
Railway Corporation (the Corporation).2.
    
    To my knowledge:
 (A)
    
    The Corporations Form 20-F accompanying this Certification, in the
form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and(B)
    
    The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.
  /s/ Lawrence C.P. LiName:
    Lawrence C.P. LiTitle:
    Director, Finance
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement of First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation (the "Company")
Nos. 333-108451, 333-89624, 333-40856 and 333-39106 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 1, 2004, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Horizon
Pharmaceutical Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.

|/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPAtlanta, Georgia
March 1, 2004 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---

QuickLinks
No. 1306.

#### Uyeki *v.*Styer, Commanding General.

June 10, 1946.

*John E. McCullough*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General McGrath*and *Frederick Bernays Wiener*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the Philippines granted.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1350

RAYMOND J. HOGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TEXTRON FLEX ALLOY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CA-03-194-3) Submitted: August 31, 2005 Decided: September 27, 2005 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond J. Hogan, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Paul Carlson, Jr.,Kristine Marie Howard, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, L.L.C., WinstonSalem, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Raymond J. Hogan appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging discrimination in employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeHogan v. Textron Flex Alloy , No. CA-03-194-3 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 185 Agreed to House (ATH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 185

Extending the period of availability of amounts for continuing expenses 
  of standing and select committees of the House through May 9, 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2003

   Mr. Ney (for himself and Mr. Larson of Connecticut) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

                             April 9, 2003

 Committee on House Administration discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Extending the period of availability of amounts for continuing expenses 
  of standing and select committees of the House through May 9, 2003.

    Resolved, That House Resolution 163 (agreed to March 26, 2003) is 
amended by striking ``April 11, 2003'' and inserting ``May 9, 2003''.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-3306 

CHARLES G. MORGAN, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 

Respondent. 

Richard Segerblom, Richard Segerblom, Ltd., of Las Vegas, Nevada, argued for 

petitioner. 

Jane W. Vanneman, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for 

respondent. With her on the brief were Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney 

General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director. 

 Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2008-3306 

CHARLES G. MORGAN, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 

 Respondent. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board 

in CASE NO(S). SE1221020082-M-3 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED July 22, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alexander J. Kuras, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[852 NYS2d 919]

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the judgment insofar as it imposed sentence is unanimously dismissed *(see People v Haywood,*203 AD2d 966 [1994], *Iv denied*83 NY2d 967 [1994]) and the judgment is affirmed.

Same memorandum as in *People v Kuras*(49 AD3d 1196 [2008] ). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Smith, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
Exhibit 10.9

 

***Text Omitted and Filed Separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Confidential Treatment Requested under 17 C.F.R. Sections 200.80(b)(4) and 230.406

 

AMENDMENT NUMBER 2

 

TO THE SUPPLY AGREEMENT

 

between GW PHARMA LIMITED (“GW”) having its registered office at Porton Down Science Park, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 OJQ and BAYER HEALTHCARE AG, Division Pharma, having its registered office at Bayerwerk, 51368 Leverkusen, Germany (“Bayer”)

 

WHEREAS, Bayer and GW executed a Supply Agreement as of the 20th day of May 2003, as amended for Canada by Amendment Number 1 to the Supply Agreement and by Amendment Number 3 to the License and Distribution Agreement;

 

WHEREAS, Bayer and GW wish to amend the sales forecast for the UK Territory.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

 

1.                                      Appendix 1, Part A shall be replaced by Appendix 1, Part A, as attached to this Amendment.

 

2.                                      This Amendment shall be executed in two counterparts, but shall not be effective until each party has executed at least one counterpart. Each counterpart shall constitute an original of this Amendment, but all counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties, through their authorised officers, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

 

	
Signed   for and on behalf of
    	
Signed   for and on behalf of
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
BAYER   HEALTHCARE AG
    	
GW   PHARMA LIMITED
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Leverkusen,   May 9, 2005
    	
Salisbury,   May 10, 2005
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   ppa. Dr. Horst Harenberg 
    	
 
    	
/s/   Justin Gover 
    
	
Dr. Horst   Harenberg
   Head of International Cooperations
   and Licensing Europe
    	
Justin   Gover
   Managing Director
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   ppa. Dr. Drk Ehle 
    	
 
    	
/s/   David Kirk 
    
	
Dr. Drk   Ehle
   Law and Patents
    	
David   Kirk
   Finance Director
    


 











 

Appendix 1

 

***

 

***

 

	
***
    	
 
    	
***
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
***
    	
 
    	
***
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
***
    	
 
    	
***
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
***
    	
 
    	
***
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
***
    	
 
    	
***
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
***
    	
 
    	
***
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
***
    	
 
    	
***
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
***
    	
 
    	
***
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
***
    	
 
    	
***
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
***
    	
 
    	
***
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
***
    	
 
    	
***
    	
 
    


 




***                           Portions of this page have been omitted pursuant to a request for Confidential Treatment and filed separately with the Commission.

 

2
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

5 filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 SETON FAMILY TRUST

8 INTERESTS by TRUSTEE

9 RICHARD A. VAN AUKEN;

10 and RICHARD A. VAN AUKEN,

11 Plaintiff-Appellants,

12 v. NO. 30,087 

13 PETER F. WIRTH, ESQ.; FLETCHER

14 R. CATRON, ESQ., CATRON, CATRON

15 & POTTOW, P.A.; SAWTELL, WIRTH

16 & BIEDSCHEID, P.C.; MICHAEL T.

17 POTTOW, ESQ.; BRYAN P. BIEDSCHEID, ESQ;

18 W. ANTHONY SAWTELL, ESQ; THOMAS B.

19 CATRON, ESQ.; JOHN S. CATRON, ESQ.;

20 KAREN AUBREY, ESQ.; BRIGGS CHENEY, ESQ.;

21 PREBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES FOUNDATION;

22 MARIE HARRISON; and DOES 1 THROUGH 20

23 INCLUSIVE,

24 Defendants-Appellees.

25 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY

26 James A. Hall, District Judge

27 Seton Family Trust Interests by Trustee

28 Richard A. Van Auken

29 Santa Fe, NM

30 Pro Se Appellant

31 Law Office of Karen Aubrey
2

1 Karen Aubrey

2 Santa Fe, NM

3 for Appellee Karen Aubrey

4 Law Office of Jack Brant, P.C.

5 John M. Brant

6 Albuquerque, NM

7 for Appellees

8 Catron, Catron and Pottow, P.A.

9 Sawtell, Wirth & Biedscheid

10 Peter F. Wirth

11 Michael T. Pottow

12 Fletcher R. Catron

13 Bryan P. Biedscheid

14 W. Anthony Sawtell

15 Thomas B. Catron

16 John S. Catron

17 MEMORANDUM OPINION

18 FRY, Chief Judge.

19 Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting a protective order to Defendant Karen

20 Aubrey. [DS 2] We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to

21 dismiss the appeal for lack of a final order and mootness. Plaintiffs filed a timely

22 memorandum in support agreeing with our proposed analysis. [MIS 2] Plaintiffs also

23 filed a motion requesting this Court to consolidate this appeal with No. 30,215. [MIO

24 2-3] For the reasons in the notice of proposed disposition, we dismiss this appeal. By

25 separate order, we also deny the motion to consolidate.
3

1 IT IS SO ORDERED.

2 

3 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

4 WE CONCUR:

5 

6 ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge

7 

8 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 117

Commending the Latino and immigrant workers who participated in the 

completion of the Pentagon renovation project, referred to as the Phoenix 

Project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2003

Mr. REYES (for himself, Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA, Mr. BACA, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. 

CARDOZA, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. 

HINOJOSA, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. PASTOR, 

Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. SOLIS, 

and Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION

Commending the Latino and immigrant workers who participated in the completion of the Pentagon renovation 

project, referred to as the Phoenix Project.

Whereas the Phoenix Project was unveiled on September 11, 

2002, the first year anniversary of the terrorist attacks 

of September 11, 2001, that threatened the Nation’s 

safety and security; 

Whereas the Phoenix Project was for renovation of the portion of the Pentagon that was damaged in the attacks; 
2

•HRES 117 IH 

Whereas the inspiration and motivation of each and every 

worker was critical to the success and completion of the 

renovation of this American symbol; 

Whereas the Phoenix Project was completed in record time 

and under budget thanks to the hard work of 3,000 dedicated workers, who, rotating in shifts, worked 24 hours 

a day, 7 days a week; 

Whereas immigrants made up more than half of these workers, a majority of them of Latino descent; 

Whereas these workers were so important that Walker Lee 

Evey, Program Manager of the Phoenix Project, acknowledged their service with a tribute in Spanish, recognizing 

their efforts, their spirit, and their dedication at the commemoration of the completion of the Phoenix Project; 

Whereas at a time when many Americans were pointing fingers at immigrants, the contributions of Hispanics to the 

Phoenix Project were embraced and celebrated as exemplifying the best of the American spirit, having worked as 

part of a team to get the job done; and 

Whereas the Latino and immigrant workers are to be commended for their commitment, their dedicated work, and 

perseverance: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) commends the Latino and immigrant work3 ers who participated in the Pentagon renovation 

4 project, referred to as the Phoenix Project; and 
3

•HRES 117 IH 

1 (2) recognizes that their hard work and out2 standing commitment were instrumental to the 

3 project’s completion.

Æ
aena_ex101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 





 




  





3











  






 






 




  





4











  






 





 




  





5











  






 





 




  





6











  








 





 




  





7











  






 





 


 


8
exh_1010.htm


Exhibit 10.10


 


 



	
Onvia, Inc.


Management Incentive Plan


	
Participants

	
Executive Officers of Onvia, Inc., other than Sales Executives


	
Objectives

	
· Achieve corporate performance that most reflect stockholder interests


· Drive and reward unified performance across executive team


· Focus on building trend for long-term, profitable growth


	
Key Achievement Metrics

	
Achievement of Board defined goals including without limitation Bookings, Net Income, EBITDA and cash flow.


	
Bonus Target

	
Between 22% - 80% of Base Salary for Participants


	
Overachievement

	
If the Company’s performance against the Key Achievement Metrics exceeds the target goals established by the Board, the Board has established accelerators to modify the Participants’ award levels.


	
Terms of Funding and Payment

	
· If the Company’s performance falls below the Key Achievement Metrics floor established by the Board, the bonus pool shall not be funded.


· Bonus pool to be funded and targets paid upon certification by the Compensation Committee of metrics achieved by the Company.
Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-1521

DAVID E. BROWN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL T. MALONEY, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Nathaniel M Gorton, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Torruella, Circuit Judge,

Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Lynch, Circuit Judge.

David E. Brown on brief pro se.

Nancy Ankers White, Special Assistant Attorney General, and

Kevin A. Anahory, Legal Division, Department of Correction, on

brief for appellees.

July 27, 2004
-2-

Per Curiam. After carefully considering the briefs and

record on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by

the district court. Among other considerations, the appellant

failed to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act

and the Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C. § 749; Parker v. Universidad

de Puerto Rico, 225 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir. 2000). The court did not

abuse its discretion in denying his second motion to amend his

complaint. Mirpuri v. Act Mfg., Inc., 212 F.3d 624 (1st Cir. 2000).

Affirmed. 1

st Cir. R. 27(c).
Advance copies of this statement are made available to the 

press under lock-up conditions with the explicit 

understanding that the data are embargoed until 8:30 a.m. 

Eastern Standard Time.

Statement of

Philip L. Rones

Deputy Commissioner

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Friday, March 9, 2007

Nonfarm payroll employment continued to trend up in 

February, and the unemployment rate, at 4.5 percent, was 

essentially unchanged from January. Payroll employment was 

up by 97,000 over the month, following gains of 226,000 in 

December and 146,000 in January, as revised. Over the year

ending in February, payroll employment grew by 2 million. 

Average hourly earnings rose by 6 cents, or 0.4 percent, 

over the month. 

In the service-providing sector, health care 

employment continued to expand, increasing by 33,000 in 

February. Health care accounted for about one in six jobs 

added to payrolls in the past 12 months. Food services 

employment also continued its upward trend, rising by 

21,000 in February. Employment in the information
2

industry, which includes publishing, broadcasting, motion 

pictures, and telecommunications, increased by 13,000. 

Employment continued to trend up in professional and 

business services (+29,000); there were job gains in 

several areas, including building services, computer 

systems design, and management and technical consulting. 

Temporary help services employment was little changed over 

the month and over the year. 

In the goods-producing sector, mining employment rose 

by 4,000 in February. Over the year, mining employment has 

increased by 49,000.

Construction employment fell by 62,000 in February. 

Adverse weather conditions in many parts of the country

likely contributed to the job declines throughout the 

industry. Employment in the residential component of 

specialty trades has been declining for the past year.

Manufacturing employment continued to trend down 

(-14,000) in February. Average weekly hours in the 

manufacturing sector were unchanged over the month, but 

factory overtime edged up by one-tenth of an hour. 

 Average hourly earnings for private sector production 

and nonsupervisory workers rose by 6 cents to $17.16 in 

February. Over the year, average hourly earnings increased 

by 4.1 percent. 
3

In February, most labor market measures from the 

household survey showed little or no change. The 

unemployment rate, at 4.5 percent, was essentially 

unchanged. The jobless rate has ranged from 4.4 to 4.6 

percent for the last 6 months. The labor force 

participation rate was 66.2 percent in February, little 

different from a year earlier. 

In summary, nonfarm payroll employment was up by 

97,000 over the month, and the unemployment rate was little 

changed at 4.5 percent.
#### Kessinger *v.*Leibracht. Wing *v.*Hoehl.

*(Circuit Court,*S. *D. Iowa.*

June Term, 1886.)

In Equity.

Love, J.

The decision in *Mahin*v. *Pfeiffer, ante,*892, disposes of these cases.