In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 18-0675V 

UNPUBLISHED 

BRADLEY HAAG, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: October 16, 2020 

 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint 

Stipulation on Damages; Influenza 

(Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury 

Related to Vaccine Administration 

(SIRVA) 

 

Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner. 

Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. 

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

 On May 11, 2018, Bradley Haag filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered left shoulder injuries as a result of an 

influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on November 12, 2015. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed 

at October 16, 2020, ¶¶ 4, 6. Petitioner further alleges that his injury lasted more than six 

months. Petition at 3; Stipulation at ¶¶ . “Respondent denies that the vaccine caused 

petitioner’s alleged shoulder injuries, or any other injury; denies that petitioner sustained 

a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration Table injury; and denies that 

petitioner’s current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. 

Nevertheless, on October 16, 2020, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, 

stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation 

reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic 

Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the 

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact 

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. 

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from 

public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012). 
2

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following 

compensation: 

A lump sum of $65,479.36, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. 

Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages 

that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. 

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of 

a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed 

to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

 s/Brian H. Corcoran 

 Brian H. Corcoran 

 Chief Special Master 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.