alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated February 29, 2008,accompanying the consolidated financial statements (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-BasedPayment” and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”) and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Watsco,Inc. and subsidiaries which are incorporated by reference in the 2007 Annual Report of Watsco, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and accompanying the schedule which is included in the Annual Report of Watsco, Inc. andsubsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the following Registration Statements of Watsco, Inc. on Forms S-3 (No. 33-7758, No. 33-37982,No. 333-00371, No. 333-01441 and No. 333-19803) and on Forms S-8 (No. 333-10363, No. 333-80341, No. 333-39380, No. 333-126824, No. 333-82011, No. 33-51934, No. 33-72798 and No. 333-86006).

 

Miami, Florida 

February 29, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 142 (Monday, July 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37018-37019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17808]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Announcement of IS-GPS-200, IS-GPS-705, IS-GPS-800; Interface 
Control Working Group (ICWG) Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice informs the public that the Global Positioning 
Systems

[[Page 37019]]

Wing will be hosting an Interface Control Working Group (ICWG) meeting 
for document/s IS-GPS-200 (NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment/Navigation User 
Interfaces), IS-GPS-705 (NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment/User Segment L5 
Interfaces), and IS-GPS-800 (NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment/User Segment L1C 
Interfaces). The meeting will address PIRN/IRN changes and contractor 
redlines to the documents.
    The ICWG is open to the general public. For those who would like to 
attend and participate in this ICWG meeting, you are requested to 
register to attend the meeting no later than 9 September 09. Please 
send the registration to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9cfd0d4d8d597ded6c9d8d597dacdcbf9d5d6cad8d7dedcd5dcca97d8df97d4d0d5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="37415e5a565b19505847565b19544345775b5844565950525b5244195651195a5e5b">[email protected]</span></a> and provide 
your name, organization, telephone number, address, and country of 
citizenship. More information, including Comments Resolution Matrixes 
(CRMs) and track changed documents, will be posted at: http://www.losangeles.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9364
    Please send all CRM comments to Vimal Gopal by 9 September 09.

DATES: Date/Time:

29 September 2009: IS-GPS-200. 8 a.m.-4 p.m.
30 September 2009: IS-GPS-800. 8 a.m.-4 p.m.
1 October 2009: IS-GPS-705. 8 a.m.-4 p.m.

    Location: Doubletree Hotel Los Angeles International Airport, 1985 
East Grand Ave, El Segundo, CA 90245, (310) 322-0999.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vimal Gopal 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f6809f9b979ad8919986979ad8958284b69a9985979891939a9385d89790d89b9f9a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9fe9f6f2fef3b1f8f0effef3b1fcebeddff3f0ecfef1f8faf3faecb1fef9b1f2f6f3">[email protected]</span></a> 1-310-416-8476 or Captain Neal Roach 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#08666d6964267a67696b604864677b69666f6d646d7b26696e26656164"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e303b3f32702c313f3d361e32312d3f30393b323b2d703f3870333732">[email protected]</span></a> 1-310-653-3771.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
DAF, Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-17808 Filed 7-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 1205.

#### Kajatek *v.*New York.

May 27, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the County Court, Onondaga County, New York, denied.
909 A.2d 285

#### IN THE MATTER OF LESTER W. CZAPELSKI, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 2, 2006.

ORDER

LESTER W. CZAPELSKI formerly of LINDEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, and who has been temporarily suspended since August 23, 2003, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LESTER W. CZAPELSKI is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.

*480ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  L YDELL C. S MITH , Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 01-2457



# 

J. B. H UNT T RANSPORT , I NCORPORATED , Defendant-Appellee. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-01-1729-MJG)
Submitted: September 10, 2002

Decided: October 9, 2002

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL
C. William Michaels, Baltimore, Maryland; Norris C. Ramsey, NORRIS C. RAMSEY, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. RogerD. Meade, Traci L. Burch, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION

PER CURIAM: On June 13, 2001, Lydell C. Smith filed this action pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West1999 & Supp. 2002). The district court dismissed his complaint, finding that Smith received his notice of right to sue from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on March 12, 2001, and so failed to file his complaint within ninety days as required by federal law. See 29 U.S.C.A. § 626(e) (West 1999). Smith appeals, and we affirm. After Smith’s former employer, J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc., moved to dismiss Smith’s complaint on timeliness grounds and Smith filed a reply asserting that he did not receive the right to sue letter until March 16, 2001 and so did timely file suit, the district court set the case in for an evidentiary hearing on this issue. No party objected tothis procedure. Rather Smith and J.B. Hunt appeared and offered evidence at the hearing supporting their respective positions.The district court carefully considered this evidence and then specifically found that Smith was not a credible witness, that Smith’s notation on his calender that he received the notice at issue on March 16 was a "fabrication" added "after the fact in order to bolster a story," and that the objective facts and preponderance of the evidence demonstrated that Smith received the right to sue notice on March 12, 2001. Ample evidence supports the district court’s determination thatSmith received the notice of right to sue on March 12, 2001; accordingly, the court did not clearly err in so finding. See Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo , 2 F.3d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oralargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 S MITH v. J. B. H UNT T RANSPORT
Exhibit 99.1




                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of VHS Network,  Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended  December 31, 2002 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  Report),  George  J.  Beattie,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:                                    /s/ Elwin D. Cathcart
                                      ----------------------------------
                                           Elwin D. Cathcard
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           Principal Financial Officer
                                           jULY 28, 2003

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### NEW YORK SUSQUEHANNA AND WESTERN RAILWAY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DIVISION OF TAXATION AND TOWNSHIP OF SPARTA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued October 16, 1985

Decided October 28, 1985.

Before Judges MICHELS, GAULKIN and STERN.

*631*Gary Newman*argued the cause for appellant *(LaBue, Farber, Newman & Holstein,*P.A., attorneys; *Steven Irwin*and *Mandelbaum & Mandelbaum,*P.A., of counsel).

*Joseph L. Yannotti,*Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent State of New Jersey, Department of Treasury, Division of Taxation *{Irwin I. Kimmelman,*Attorney General, attorney; *Deborah T. Poritz,*Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Lasser reported at 6 *N.J.Tax*575 (Tax Ct.1984).

Plaintiff’s challenge to the judgment is principally founded upon its contention that “the Tax Court erred in its ruling that the court did not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a final decision of the Division of Taxation.” Our reading of Judge Lasser’s opinion, however, satisfies us that he made no such ruling; we therefore do not determine whether the Tax Court does or does not have jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal.

We also do not address plaintiff’s contention that “the taxpayer should not be required to engage in a useless and fruitless quagmire of multiple litigations.” Plaintiff was faced with only a single municipal assessment for the year 1983. Judge Lasser thus was not called upon to determine whether some procedural remedy should be fashioned to avoid the burden of multiple and duplicative litigations. *Cf. Exxon Corp. v. Tp. of East Brunswick,*192 *N.J.Super.*329 (App.Div.1983), certif. den. 96 *N.J.*312 (1984). We leave that question, together with the jurisdiction question, to another day and another case.

Affirmed.
#### William Lee ANDERSON, II, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 12-7561.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.

William Lee Anderson, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Lee Anderson, II seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A-certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demon*262strating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Anderson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
January 22, 2013


 


Janet S. Thomas is lending Innovative Designs,
Inc the amount of $23,000 Dollars, for a period of 90 days, at an interest rate of 10%. Repayment of $25,300, interest included,
will be made by April 22, 2013.


 


	/s/ Janet S. Thomas	 
	Janet S. Thomas	 
	 	 
	/s/ Joseph Riccelli	 
	Joseph Riccelli, CEO Innovative Designs, Inc.
#### KAPLAN v. McCORMICK HARVESTING MACH. CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

December 18, 1902.)

No. 1,778.

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.

A. C. Paul, for plaintiff in error. Robert H. Parkinson, for defendant in error.

Dismissed, with costs, for want of prosecution.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2260

ALEXIS B. CASTILLO NAJERA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General; UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A96-446-367)

Submitted: May 5, 2006 Decided: June 27, 2006

Before MICHAEL and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas A. Elliot, Thomas K. Ragland, ELLIOT & MAYOCK, Washington,

D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney

General, Donald E. Keener, Deputy Director, Alison Marie Igoe,

Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Alexis B. Castillo Najera, a native and citizen of

Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“Board”) order finding him removable as a result of a state

conviction for possession of cocaine. Najera contends the charge

to which he pled guilty is not a conviction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1101(a)(48)(A)(2000). He further contends it is a violation of

his right to equal protection. We deny the petition for review.

We find there is no merit to Najera’s claim that the

prior conviction for drug possession should not be considered a

conviction for removability purposes. See Acosta v. Ashcroft, 341

F.3d 218, 222 (3d Cir. 2003). We further find no merit to Najera’s

equal protection claim. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Tuesday 7th

May, 1996.

Crystal F. Bowen, Appellants,

against Record No. 1532-94-3

Claim No. 163-78-25

Automotive Industries, Inc. and

Employers Insurance of Wausau, Appellees.

From the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission

An order dated March 7, 1996 was received from the Supreme

Court of Virginia on March 27, 1996 and is recorded as follows:

Automotive Industries, Inc., et al., Appellants,

against Record No. 951843

Crystal F. Bowen, Appellee.

From the Court of Appeals of Virginia

Upon consideration of the petition for appeal and the brief

in opposition filed herein, an appeal is awarded the appellants from a

judgment rendered by the Court of Appeals of Virginia on September 12,

1995, in the above-styled proceeding. Upon further consideration, the

said judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of this Court's

decisions in The Steinrich Group, et al. v. Claudia H. Jemmott , Record

No. 950829, Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Linda Kay Martin , Record No. 951050,and Wampler-Longacre Chicken, Inc. et al. v. Shirley A. Biller , Record

No. 951072 (March 1, 1996).

This order shall be certified to the Court of Appeals of

Virginia and to the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission.

A Copy,

Teste:

David B. Beach, Clerk

By: /s/ Patricia H. Krueger

Deputy Clerk

A Copy,

Teste:

Clerk
Page 27

Exhibit 31.1.  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Chief Executive Officer Certification
Pursuant To Section 302 Of 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

|I, James D. Delamater, certify that:
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|1.                                  
|                                    
|2.                                  
|                                    
|3.                                  
|                                    
|4.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|5.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    



|November 10, 2005 | /s/ James D. Delamater 
|----------------- | -----------------------
|                  | James D. Delamater     
|                  | Chief Executive Officer
The State s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 5, 2015

No. 04-15-00090-CR

Anthony Alex DELEON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-1992-CR-B

The Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Court reporter Patricia Wagner has filed a notification of late reporter’s record, 

requesting an extension to August 18, 2015. We GRANT her request and ORDER her to file the 

reporter’s record on or before August 18, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE 

GRANTED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of August, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# Fatal heat burns (152)

Fatal occupational injuries with nature of heat (thermal) burns, private industry, 2018 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries with nature of heat (thermal) burns, private industry, 2018		

Fatal occupational injuries with nature of heat (thermal) burns, private industry, 2018 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries with nature of heat (thermal) burns, private industry, 2018		

Page &P	

# Fatal 3rd or 4th degree burns
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PALIGENT INC.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), SalvatoreA. Bucci, as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date:  May 12, 2004 | by:    | /s/ Salvatore A. Bucci                 |   |
|--------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Salvatore A. Bucci                     |
|                     |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                     |   | (Principal Financial  Officer)         |

 

----
AmendmentNo1toRightsPlan_CORE




EXHIBIT 4.1
AMENDMENT NO. 1
 
TO
 
RIGHTS AGREEMENT
 


This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Rights Agreement, made and entered into as of December 20, 2012 (the “Rights Agreement”), by and between Contango ORE, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Computershare Trust Company, N.A.,, as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”), is made and entered into as of March 21, 2013, by and between the Company and the Rights Agent.
 
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Rights Agreement on the terms and conditions contained herein.
 
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements set forth herein, the parties hereby agree to amend the Rights Agreement as follows:
 
1.Amendments.
(a)    The definition of "Acquiring Person" in Section 1(a) is amended by deleting “fifteen percent (15%)” where it appears and replacing it with “twenty percent (20%).”
(b)    Section 3(a) of the Rights Agreement is amended by deleting “fifteen percent (15%)” where it appears and replacing it with “twenty percent (20%).”
(c)    Section 23(a) of the Rights Agreement is amended by deleting “fifteen percent (15%)” where it appears and replacing it with “twenty percent (20%).”
(d)    Exhibit C to the Rights Agreement is amended by deleting “fifteen percent (15%)” where it appears and replacing it with “twenty percent (20%).”
2.    No Further Amendments.  Except as expressly provided herein, the terms and conditions of the Rights Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
3.    Counterparts.  This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
4.    Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the conflicts of law provisions thereof.
[Signature page follows.]









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.
 
 
	
			
	 
	CONTANGO ORE, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ BRAD JUNEAU

	 
	 
	Name: Brad Juneau

	 
	 
	Title:   President

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.

	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ IAN YEWER

	 
	 
	Name:  Ian Yewer

	 
	 
	Title:  Branch Manager

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 







Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement