alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
306

-11

910

1,145

220

-96

-14

205

401

195

662

74

-146

728

-200 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200

Government 

Other services 

Leisure and hospitality 

Education and health services 

Professional and business services 

Financial activities 

Information 

Utilities 

Transportation and warehousing 

Retail trade 

Wholesale trade 

Manufacturing 

Construction 

Natural resources and mining 

Employment change (seasonally adjusted, in thousands),

August 2003 to December 2005

Chart 1-9. Employment rose in most industries from August 

2003 to December 2005

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 1-9. Employment rose in most industries from August 

2003 to December 2005

• The job growth that began in August 2003 was fairly widespread among the 

major industry sectors. Employment gains in professional and business 

services, in education and health, and in leisure and hospitality accounted for 

about 60 percent of job growth over the time period. 

• A robust housing market contributed to employment gains in construction and 

in building-related industries.

• Between August 2003 and December 2005, employment declined in 

manufacturing and in information.
MDCO-12-31-12-Ex 10.68






Exhibit 10.68




AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING AGREEMENT


This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Consulting Agreement is effective as of July 6, 2012 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), by and between THE MEDICINES COMPANY, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located at 8 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 (the “Company”) and STRATEGIC IMAGERY, LLC, having an address of 315 South Shore Drive, Sarasota, Florida 34234 (the “Consultant”).  The Company and the Consultant shall, at times throughout this Amendment, be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.


WHEREAS, the Parties are parties to a certain Consulting Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2012 (the “Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement as more particularly set forth herein.  


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree that, as of the Amendment Effective Date, the Agreement is amended as follows:


1.    Section 4.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


		
	4.1
	During the Term of this Agreement, the Company will pay the Consultant hourly consulting fees in the amount of $500. Consultant is authorized to spend a maximum of 240 hours in connection with the Services. The total amount payable for the Services under this Agreement shall not exceed $120,000 without prior written authorization from Company. The Company's payment of the fees specified in this Agreement constitutes full payment to Consultant for the Services and Consultant shall not receive any other compensation or benefits for the Services.  If, however, the Company requests a modification of the Services, the Parties shall agree in writing to adjust the fee accordingly.




2.    Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings provided in the Agreement.


3.    Except as modified in this Amendment, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in effect. This Amendment shall be deemed to be part of the Agreement and, as modified in accordance herewith, the Agreement is hereby ratified and declared in full force and effect.




[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party is signing this Agreement on the date stated below that Party's signature.




THE MEDICINES COMPANY 






By:    /s/ Clive A. Meanwell        
Name:     Clive A. Meanwell
Title:    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dated:        12/3/12        






STRATEGIC IMAGERY, LLC






By:     /s/ Robert G. Savage        
Name:     Robert G. Savage
Title:    President


Dated:        12/3/12
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 142 (Monday, July 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWO350000.L14300000]


Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for Programmatic 
Environmental Impact Statement To Develop and Implement Agency-Specific 
Programs for Solar Energy Development

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy and the Bureau of Land Management 
(BLM) (the Agencies) are extending the public comment period for the 
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement to Develop and Implement 
Agency-Specific Programs for Solar Energy Development (Solar PEIS). The 
Solar PEIS includes BLM-administered lands in the States of Arizona, 
California, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, and Utah. A notice published 
in the Federal Register on June 30, 2009 [74 FR 31307] provided for a 
public comment period ending on July 30, 2009.

DATES: Several individuals and organizations have requested an 
extension of the comment period. The Agencies have decided to act in 
accordance with these requests; therefore, comments on the solar energy 
study areas will now be accepted through September 14, 2009. Comments 
received or postmarked after September 14, 2009 will be considered to 
the extent practicable.

ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments by the following methods:
    <bullet> Electronically, using the online comment form available on 
the project Web site: http://solareis.anl.gov. This is the preferred 
method of commenting.
    <bullet> In writing, addressed to: Solar Energy PEIS, Argonne 
National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue--EVS/900, Argonne, IL 60439.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact: Linda 
Resseguie, BLM Washington Office, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cea2a7a0aaaf91bcabbdbdaba9bba7ab8eaca2a3e0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec808582888db39e899f9f898b998589ac8e8081c28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-452-
7774; or Lisa Jorgensen, Department of Energy, Golden Field Office, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#75191c06145b1f1a0712101b06101b35121a5b111a105b121a03"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e02071d0f4004011c090b001d0b002e0901400a010b40090118">[email protected]</span></a>, 303-275-4906. You may also visit the Solar 
PEIS Web site at http://solareis.anl.gov.

Mike Pool,
Acting Director, Bureau of Land Management.
[FR Doc. E9-17782 Filed 7-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 659 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  Union Calendar No. 18
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 659

                          [Report No. 108-27]

    To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act regarding the 
   requirements for mortgage insurance under such Act for hospitals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

    Mr. Ney (for himself, Ms. Waters, and Mr. Baker) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

                             March 6, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act regarding the 
   requirements for mortgage insurance under such Act for hospitals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hospital Mortgage Insurance Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. STANDARDS FOR DETERMINING NEED AND FEASIBILITY FOR HOSPITALS.

    Paragraph (4) of section 242(d) of the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1715z-7) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(4)(A) The Secretary shall require satisfactory evidence that the 
hospital will be located in a State or political subdivision of a State 
with reasonable minimum standards of licensure and methods of operation 
for hospitals and satisfactory assurance that such standards will be 
applied and enforced with respect to the hospital.
    ``(B) The Secretary shall establish the means for determining need 
and feasibility for the hospital. If the State has an official 
procedure for determining need for hospitals, the Secretary shall also 
require that such procedure be followed before the application for 
insurance is submitted, and the application shall document that need 
has also been established under that procedure.''.

                                                  Union Calendar No. 18

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 659

                          [Report No. 108-27]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act regarding the 
   requirements for mortgage insurance under such Act for hospitals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 6, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 978

To amend chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that certain 

Federal annuity computations are adjusted by 1 percentage point relating 

to periods of receiving disability payments, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2003

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia (for herself and Mr. GREENWOOD) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To amend chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code, to 

provide that certain Federal annuity computations are 

adjusted by 1 percentage point relating to periods of 

receiving disability payments, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ANNUITY COMPUTATION ADJUSTMENT FOR PE4 RIODS OF DISABILITY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8415 of title 5, United 

6 States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating the second subsection (i) 

8 as subsection (k); and 
2

•HR 978 IH 

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(l) In the case of any annuity computation under 

3 this section that includes, in the aggregate, at least 2 

4 months of credit under section 8411(d) for any period 

5 while receiving benefits under subchapter I of chapter 81, 

6 the percentage otherwise applicable under this section for 

7 that period so credited shall be increased by 1 percentage 

8 point.’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 8422(d)(2) 

10 of title 5, United States Code (as added by section 

11 122(b)(2) of Public Law 107–135) is amended by striking 

12 ‘‘8415(i)’’ and inserting ‘‘8415(k)’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply with respect to any annuity entitle15 ment to which is based on a separation from service occur16 ring on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 935 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 935

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion from 
   gross income for employer-provided health coverage for employees' 
 spouses and dependent children to coverage provided to other eligible 
                 designated beneficiaries of employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2003

 Mr. McDermott (for himself, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Matsui, Ms. Norton, 
 Ms. Lee, Mr. Filner, Mr. Nadler, Mr. George Miller of California, Ms. 
Carson of Indiana, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Kolbe, Ms. 
Woolsey, Mr. Blumenauer, and Mr. Berman) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion from 
   gross income for employer-provided health coverage for employees' 
 spouses and dependent children to coverage provided to other eligible 
                 designated beneficiaries of employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Equity for Health Plan 
Beneficiaries Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED HEALTH COVERAGE TO 
              ALL ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES OF EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 106 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to contributions by employer to accident and health plans) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Coverage Provided for Eligible Beneficiaries of Employees.--
In the case of employer-provided coverage under an accident or health 
plan for an eligible beneficiary (other than a spouse or child) of an 
employee, such coverage shall be treated for purposes of this section 
in the same manner as such coverage for the spouse of an employee is 
treated.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 231

Supporting the goals and ideals of Peace Officers Memorial Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2003

Mr. HEFLEY (for himself, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. WAXMAN, Mrs. 

JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. RAMSTAD, and Mr. 

STUPAK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideals of Peace Officers Memorial 

Day.

Whereas the well-being of all people of the United States is 

preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance 

and dedication of law enforcement personnel; 

Whereas more than 700,000 law enforcement personnel, at 

great risk to their personal safety, serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace; 

Whereas peace officers are on the front line in preserving the 

right of the children of the United States to receive an 

education in a crime-free environment, a right that is all 

too often threatened by the insidious fear caused by violence in schools; 
2

•HRES 231 IH 

Whereas more than 147 peace officers across the Nation were 

killed in the line of duty during 2002, well below the decade-long average of 165 deaths annually, and a major 

drop from 2001 when 230 officers were killed, including 

72 officers in the September 11th terrorist attacks; 

Whereas every year, 1 out of every 9 peace officers is assaulted, 1 out of every 25 peace officers is injured, and 

1 out of every 4,400 peace officers is killed in the line 

of duty; 

Whereas section 136 of title 36, United States Code, requests 

that the President issue each year a proclamation designating May 15 as Peace Officers Memorial Day in honor 

of Federal, State, and local officers killed or disabled in 

the line of duty; and 

Whereas on May 15, 2003, more than 15,000 peace officers 

are expected to gather in Washington, D.C. to join with 

the families of their recently fallen comrades to honor 

those comrades and all others who went before them: 

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of Peace Offi3 cers Memorial Day to honor Federal, State, and 

4 local peace officers killed or disabled in the line of 

5 duty; and 

6 (2) calls upon the people of the United States 

7 to observe such a day with appropriate ceremonies 

8 and respect.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Watsco, Inc. (Watsco) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Albert H. Nahmad, the Chief Executive Officer of Watsco,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Watsco.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Albert H. NahmadAlbert H. Nahmad Chief Executive Officer
March 1, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Watsco and will be retained by Watsco and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Watsco for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Nos. 31811-3-II; 31818-1-II; 31821-1-II.

Division Two.

December 20, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Kerri Lyn Ritterbusch, *Respondent.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, Nos. 02-1-00402-7, 04-1-00045-0, and 02-1--00422-1, F. Mark McCauley, J., entered May 21, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., and Houghton, J.
[910 NYS2d 641]

#### Underhill-Washington Equities, LLC, Petitioner, v Pearl Campbell et al., Respondents.

Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County,

October 20, 2010

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Karabelas & Papagianopoulos, LLP,*Long Island City, for petitioner. *Wenig Saltiel LLP,*Brooklyn *(Angelyn Johnson*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gary F. Marton, J.

*208This is a holdover proceeding. The premises at issue are a rent-controlled apartment. Petitioner alleges that it may recover possession thereof because respondent Campbell does not occupy the same as her primary residence. Respondents joined issue and, among other things, deny the same. Now petitioner moves to strike defenses and for leave to take discovery, and respondents cross-move for summary judgment. As set out below, the motion is denied, the cross motion is granted, and the proceeding is dismissed. Upon service of a copy of this decision/order with notice of entry, respondents may move for relief on their counterclaim.

Respondents cross-move on the ground that petitioner did not comply with New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations (9 NYCRR) § 2204.3. That regulation required petitioner to file with the appropriate district rent office of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal of the State of New York (DHCR) a copy of the predicate notice of termination and an affidavit of service therefor; in pertinent part, section 2204.3 (a) specifies that no proceeding to evict (except for nonpayment of rent) “shall be commenced . . . unless and until the landlord shall have given written notice to the tenant and the district rent office” and section 2204.3 (c) provides that “[wjithin 48 hours after the notice is served upon the tenant, an exact copy thereof, together with an affidavit of service, shall be filed with the district rent office.”

Petitioner’s moving papers show only that a notice was served upon the tenant and that a copy was filed 24 hours later at a DHCR district rent office in Queens, New York. In two ways, that is not enough. First, there is nothing probative of petitioner’s filing an affidavit of service at DHCR. Petitioner alleges that its filing included the same, but the allegation is made by a person who does not have knowledge of the filing. Second, while the filing was made at a DHCR district rent office, it was not made at “the” district office. As 9 NYCRR 2200.3 (g) and 2200.8 make plain, with respect to housing accommodations in Brooklyn, New York, the appropriate office is the one in Brooklyn, New York, and not the one in Queens, New York.*

This noncompliance is fatal to petitioner’s case. *(See e.g. 1015 Wash. Ave. Mgt. Co. v Blecher,*26 AD2d 648 [2d Dept 1966]; *209*Shahid v Carillo,*7 Misc 3d 134[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 50652[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2005].) Accordingly, the court grants the cross motion and the other relief set out above. Petitioner’s motion is moot and the court denies it as such.

*

 DHCR’s Web site at http://www.nysdhcr.gov/AboutUs/contact.htm states that the Brooklyn Borough Rent Office is located at 55 Hanson Place, Room 702, Brooklyn, New York 11217.
Saturna Capital Corporation  1300 N. State St.Bellingham, WA 98225800/SATURNA

 

January 2, 2012

 

Board of Trustees of Saturna Investment Trust

> 
Re: **Voluntary Advisory Fee Waivers**

Gentlemen:

This is to advise you that Saturna again undertakes to subsidize certain Sextant Funds by waiving the management fee for these Funds to the extent necessary to limit such Funds' annual expenses (excluding taxes, commissions, and extraordinary expenses but including any expense of a Rule 12b-1 plan) through March 31, 2013, as follows:

| **Fund**                | **Limit** |
|-------------------------|-----------|
| Short Term Bond Fund    | 0.75%     |
| Bond Income Fund        | 0.90%     |
| Global High Income Fund | 0.90%     |

The Adviser also continues, through March 31, 2013, its undertaking to waive its entire advisory fee for the Sextant Short-Term Bond Fund, Sextant Bond Income Fund or Sextant Core Fund on days when assets of that Fund are under $2 million.

This undertaking may be canceled with respect to any of these Funds only with the consent of the Board of Trustees or the termination of the management contract of any such Fund with the Adviser.

> 
Saturna Capital Corporation

By */s/ Jane K. Carten*        Jane K. Carten, President