alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 860 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 860

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase 
              in income taxes on Social Security benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2003

  Mr. Toomey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase 
              in income taxes on Social Security benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF 1993 INCREASE IN TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 86(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social security and tier 1 railroad 
retirement benefits) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence:
        ``This paragraph shall not apply to any taxable year beginning 
        after December 31, 2002.''
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Paragraph (3) of section 871(a) of such Code is amended 
        by striking ``85 percent'' in subparagraph (A) and inserting 
        ``50 percent''.
            (2)(A) Subparagraph (A) of section 121(e)(1) of the Social 
        Security Amendments of 1983 (Public Law 98-21) is amended--
                    (i) by striking ``(A) There'' and inserting 
                ``There'';
                    (ii) by striking ``(i)'' immediately following 
                ``amounts equivalent to''; and
                    (iii) by striking ``, less (ii)'' and all that 
                follows and inserting a period.
            (B) Paragraph (1) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        by striking subparagraph (B).
            (C) Paragraph (3) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        by striking subparagraph (B) and by redesignating subparagraph 
        (C) as subparagraph (B).
            (D) Paragraph (2) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        in the first sentence by striking ``paragraph (1)(A)'' and 
        inserting ``paragraph (1)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 30400-7-II.

Division Two.

December 6, 2005.]

#### James Monk, *Appellant,*v. The Department of Labor and Industries, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 02-2-00736-9, Jill Johanson, J., entered May 13, 2003. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Hunt, J.; Morgan, J. Pro Tern., concurring separately.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

October 16, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00612

- CV

David Allan EDWARDS

, Appellant

v.

SHERIFF OF COUNTY OF ATASCOSA

,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial Dis trict Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 02

- 0185

- CVA Honorable Thomas F. Lee, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due on September 29 , 201 4

. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. Appellant is represent ing himself, pro se . It is therefore ORDERED that appellant file his brief no later than November 13, 201 4 . If appellant fails to file the brief by this date or fails to reasonably explain the reason for his failure to do so, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a ).

The Clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested, and by United States mail.

____________________________ _____ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of October, 2014

.

_________________________ __________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
d1367891_ex4-41.htm




Exhibit 4.41







ADDENDUM NO.1


to a Consultancy Agreement dated 1st September 2010


with effect as of 1st January 2013


(the "Consultancy Agreement")







This Addendum No. 1 is dated as of 1st day of January 2013 and entered into by and between:








	
(1)  

	
DRYSHIPS INC. a company organized and existing under the laws of Marshall Islands with registered address at Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshall Islands MH96960 (the "Dryships"); and













	
(2)  

	
VIVID FINANCE LIMITED, a company organized and existing under the laws of Cyprus and having its registered office at 10 Skopa street, Nicosia, Cyprus (the "Vivid")












(collectively referred to as "Parties", and individually as "Party").







WHEREAS pursuant to the terms of the Consultancy Agreement, Dryships engaged Vivid to act as consultant on financing matters for Dryships and its affiliates, subsidiaries or holding companies, including Ocean Rig UDW Inc., and Vivid accepted such engagement for a fee of twenty basis points (0.20%) on the total transaction amount.







WHEREAS Clause 2 of the Consultancy Agreement provides that:







"Engagement. The Company hereby engages the Consultant to act as consultant on matters of financing for the Company and for any affiliates, subsidiaries or holding companies (the "Affiliates") as directed by the Company, and to provide the services set forth herein below to this Agreement (the "Services") as defined in the Scope of Works and the Consultant hereby accepts such engagement".







WHEREAS the Parties have agreed to amend and/or vary the Consultancy Agreement in order to exclude the provision of financing services to the majority owned subsidiary of Dryships, Ocean Rig UDW Inc., from the scope of the Consultancy Agreement.







NOW THEREFORE the Parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:







Clause 2 of the Consultancy Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:







"Engagement. The Company hereby engages the Consultant to act as consultant on matters of financing for the Company and for any affiliates or subsidiaries (the "Affiliates"), as directed by the Company, excluding its majority owned subsidiary, Ocean Rig UDW Inc. and its subsidiaries, and to provide the services set forth herein below to this Agreement (the "Services") 


 




  





  











  






 


 


as defined in the Scope of Works and the Consultant hereby accepts such engagement".







All other terms and conditions of the Consultancy Agreement shall remain unaltered, in full force and effect and binding on the Parties.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Addendum as of the date first above written.







                                                                               



	
For and on behalf of    


DRYSHIPS INC.


 


 


/s/ Ziad Nakhleh


Name:  Ziad Nakhleh


Title:  Chief Financial Officer


 

	
For and on behalf of


VIVID FINANCE LIMITED


 


 


/s/ Yiannoula Georghiades


 Name: Yiannoula Georghiades 


Title:  Sole Director
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 699 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 699

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a comprehensive 
study of the Rathdrum Prairie/Spokane Valley Aquifer, located in Idaho 
                            and Washington.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

Mr. Nethercutt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a comprehensive 
study of the Rathdrum Prairie/Spokane Valley Aquifer, located in Idaho 
                            and Washington.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE RATHDRUM PRAIRIE/SPOKANE VALLEY 
              AQUIFER.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation 
with the State of Idaho and the State of Washington, shall conduct a 
comprehensive study of the Rathdrum Prairie/Spokane Valley Aquifer for 
the purpose of preparing a model of the aquifer and establishing for 
those States a mutually acceptable understanding of the aquifer as a 
ground water resource.
    (b) Report.--The Secretary shall submit to the Congress a report on 
the findings and conclusions of the study by not later than 3 years 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    For conducting the study under this Act there is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary $3,500,000.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 164 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 164

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
        human rights situation in Cuba, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2003

Mr. Flake submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
        human rights situation in Cuba, and for other purposes.

Whereas the Cuban government continues to systematically violate fundamental 
        civil and political rights of its citizens;
Whereas the Cuban government denies citizens the freedoms of speech, press, 
        assembly, and association;
Whereas the Cuban government denies political dissidents and human rights 
        advocates due process;
Whereas Cuban authorities routinely harass, threaten, arbitrarily arrest, 
        detain, imprison, and defame human rights advocates and members of 
        independent professional associations, including journalists and 
        economists;
Whereas in March 2003 the Cuban government detained dozens of independent 
        journalists and political activists solely for exercising their right to 
        freedom of expression;
Whereas in May 2002 a group of Cuban citizens led by Oswaldo Paya, in an effort 
        known as the Varela Project, submitted over 11,000 signatures to the 
        National Assembly of the Republic of Cuba in support of a referendum on 
        guarantees of human rights and civil liberties;
Whereas many of the supporters of the Varela Project were among those detained 
        in March 2003;
Whereas the Varela Project seeks a national referendum on fundamental civil 
        liberties, including freedom of speech, amnesty for political prisoners, 
        support for private business, a new electoral law, and a general 
        election; and
Whereas the goal of United States policy in Cuba is to promote a peaceful 
        transition to democracy: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) calls on the Cuban government to immediately release 
        all prisoners of conscience, including those detained in March 
        2003; and
            (2) calls on the Cuban government to provide its citizens 
        with internationally-accepted standards for civil, political, 
        and human rights, and the opportunity to vote in free and fair 
        elections.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jay Rembolt, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of WD-40 Company (the Company), have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009 (the Report). For purposes of Section 1350 of Title 18, United
States Code, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 16, 2009



/s/ JAY W. REMBOLTJay W. RemboltVice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23
         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-53967, 2-71723, 2-94699, 
33-26823, 33-57879, 33-57881 and 33-59765) and in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(No. 33-60645) of Westvaco Corporation of our report dated
November 18, 1996 appearing on page 33 of the Westvaco Corporation
1996 Annual Report to Shareholders which is incorporated by reference
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.






Price Waterhouse LLP
New York, NY 
December 17, 1996
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF NEW VALLEY

     The following is a list of the active subsidiaries of New Valley as of
March 25, 2002, indicating the jurisdiction of incorporation of each and the
names under which such subsidiaries conduct business.

<Table>
<Caption>
               NAME OF BUSINESS (% OWNERSHIP)                 JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
               ------------------------------                 -----------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
New Valley Capital Corporation (100%).......................  Delaware
Thinkcorp Holding Corporation (72.7%).......................  Delaware
BrookeMil Ltd. (100%).......................................  Cayman Islands
ALKI Corp. (100%)...........................................  Delaware
</Table>

     Not included above are other subsidiaries which, if considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary,
as such term is defined by Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
#### GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PDI COMMUNICATIONS, INC., North American Cable Equipment, Inc., Perfectvision Manufacturing, Inc., and DSI Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2012-1619.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 8, 2013.

Guy M. Burns, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel *&*Burns, LLP, of Tampa, FL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Jonathan S. Coleman. Of counsel on the brief was J. Wiley Horton, Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson, Bell & Dunbar, P.A., of Tallahassee, FL.

Gregory A. Castanias, Jones Day, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Jennifer L. Swize; Louis Touton, of Los An-geles, CA.

RADER, Chief Judge, REYNA and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

*952ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Women

Chart 3-2. About 1 in 20 workers has more than one job

Total

Men

Women

Percent

NOTE: Data are for May of each year. Beginning in 1994, data reflect the introduction of a major redesign of the Current 

Population Survey. Comprehensive surveys of multiple jobholders were not conducted in 1981-84, 1986-88, 1990, and 1992-93.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Men

Chart 3-2. About 1 in 20 workers has more than one job

• In May 2005, about 7.3 million workers held more than one job, representing 

5.2 percent of all employed persons. 

• For women, the multiple jobholding rate rose markedly from 1970 through the 

end of the 1980s, while the rate for men changed little over this period. For 

the last several years, women have been somewhat more likely than men to 

work more than one job.
Exhibit 32.1








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William H. Armstrong III, as Chairman of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 16, 2010








By:  /s/ William H. Armstrong III


William H. Armstrong III


Chairman of the Board,


President & Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We haveissued our report dated February 27, 2009 (except for earnings per share amounts as discussed in Note 1 – Accounting Changes - Earnings per Share, as to which the date is February 26, 2010), with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Watsco, Inc. and subsidiaries which is incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of Watsco, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in thefollowing Registration Statements of Watsco, Inc. on Form S-3 (No. 333-163678) and Forms S-8 (No. 333-159776, No. 333-149467, No. 333-126824, No. 333-86006, No. 333-39380, No. 333-82011, No. 333-80341,No. 333-10363, No. 33-51934 and No. 33-72798). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Miami, Florida 

February 26, 2010
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(b)
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in each prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-30729,
33-41417, and 33-41475), and on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-92085, 33-44044, 33-45365,
33-46779, 33-51445, 33-51579, 33-53815, 33-53819, 33-62043, 33-62045, 333-12583,
333-12589, 333-12591, 333-13219, 333-30127, 333-23661, 333-23663, and 333-37497)
of CBS Corporation of our report dated February 12, 1996 except for the
restatements discussed in notes 1 and 7, for which the dates are March 31, 1996,
November 13, 1996, and September 30, 1997, appearing on page 25 of this Form
10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the
Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page 56 of this Form 10-K.
 
/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

Price Waterhouse LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 24, 1998
 
                                CBS CORPORATION
                                       66
Saturna Capital Corporation  1300 N. State St.Bellingham, WA 98225800/SATURNA

 

December 02, 2013

 

Board of Trustees of Saturna Investment Trust

> 
Re: **Voluntary Advisory Fee Waivers**

Gentlemen:

This is to advise you that Saturna again undertakes to subsidize certain Sextant Funds by waiving the management fee for these Funds to the extent necessary to limit such Funds' annual expenses (excluding taxes, commissions, and extraordinary expenses but including any expense of a Rule 12b-1 plan) through March 31, 2015, as follows:

| **Fund**                | **Limit** |
|-------------------------|-----------|
| Short Term Bond Fund    | 0.75%     |
| Bond Income Fund        | 0.90%     |
| Global High Income Fund | 0.90%     |

The Adviser also continues, through March 31, 2015, its undertaking to waive its entire advisory fee for the Sextant Short-Term Bond Fund, Sextant Bond Income Fund or Sextant Core Fund on days when assets of that Fund are under $2 million.

This undertaking may be canceled with respect to any of these Funds only with the consent of the Board of Trustees or the termination of the management contract of any such Fund with the Adviser.

> 
Saturna Capital Corporation

By */s/ Jane K. Carten*        Jane K. Carten, President
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Garry O. Ridge, President and Chief
Executive Officer of WD-40 Company (the Company), have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009 (the Report). For purposes of Section 1350 of Title 18, United
States Code, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 16, 2009



/s/ GARRY O. RIDGEGarry O. RidgePresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### CHEMACID, S.A., v. FERROTAR CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 29, 1942.

*46Abraham L. Pomerantz, of New York City, (Julius Levy and Leonard I. Schreiber, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Solomon Goodman, of New York City, for defendant.

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

Defendant seeks an order dismissing the complaint and granting judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, on the ground that said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Plaintiff, a Belgian corporation, commenced this action against defendant, a New York corporation, for an accounting and to recover certain monies allegedly due it by virtue of an agency agreement between the parties.

Defendant asserts that since Belgian law governs plaintiff’s right to institute this action, the complaint fails to state a cause of action, since plaintiff has failed to plead Belgian law.

 Defendant’s contention is without merit. Foreign law must be pleaded where the cause of action relied on is based upon that law. Keaseby & Mattison v. Rothensis, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 626. In the case at bar, the complaint sets forth a simple cause of action for an accounting and is not based upon any rights accruing to the plaintiff by virtue of the laws of Belgium.

This is purely a matter of pleading and is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, more particularly Rule 9 (a), which deals with capacity to sue. Rule 9(a) specifically provides that the capacity authority of a party to sue need not be averred. It further provides that lack of capacity is an affirmative defense which must be raised by answer. Having failed to assert it by motion prior to answer or.in the answer itself, defendant must be held to have waived its objection. See Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Accordingly, defendant’s motion is denied. Settle order on notice.