alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, John Alderfer, as the Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., the sole Manager ofVestin Fund I, LLC, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Vestin Fund I, LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of Vestin Fund I, LLC as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. Vestin Fund I, LLC’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Vestin Fund I, LLC and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to Vestin Fund I, LLC, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-82377 and 34-47986;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Fund I, LLC’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Fund I, LLC’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during Vestin Fund I, LLC’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,Vestin Fund I, LLC’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. Vestin Fund I, LLC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Vestin Fund I, LLC’s auditors andthe audit committee of Vestin Fund I, LLC’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect Vestin Fund I, LLC’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in Vestin Fund I, LLC’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:September 13, 2005/s/ John Alderfer
[No. 55255-4-I.

Division One.

October 31, 2005.]

#### Larry Horstman et al., *Appellants,*v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-2-01268-8, Laura Gene Middaugh, J., entered October 29, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Cox, C.J., and Agid, J.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 8, 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 00783

- CV

Juan Pablo Mayorga, Appellant

v.

Maria Mayorga, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AN D FIELD AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

–

OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment s signed by the tr i a l court on August 23, 2013, and October 25,

2013 . Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was

reversible error in th e portion of the August 23 judgment that values the Guanajuato property at

80,960 pesos and th e portion that makes specific money awards for the mortgage, insurance,

appraisal fees, repair, and maintenance on the homestead property appellee paid from the time the

temporary orders were signed through closing. Therefore, the Court reverses those portions of the

trial court’s August 23 judgm ent and remand s those issues for further consideration and clarification

by the district court. However, we affirm th e portion of the August 23 judgment that awards

appellee $1,000 in attorney’s fees

. The Court further vacates th e portion of the October 2 5 order

that awards sanctions against appellant. Each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred by that

party , both in this Court and the court below.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MATTHEW RIDGE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10049

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00455-LDG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2013** 

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Matthew Ridge appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the

151-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution

of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). We dismiss. 

FILED

MAR 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10049

Ridge argues that the district court improperly determined that he was a

career offender under the Guidelines. The government contends that Ridge’s

appeal is barred by a valid appeal waiver. We review de novo whether Ridge has

waived his right to appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 981 (9th

Cir. 2009). Ridge contends that the appeal waiver should not be enforced because

at his sentencing hearing the district court advised him that he had waived his right

to appeal, but that he retained limited appellate rights, including the right to appeal

an illegal sentence. The district court’s qualified advisement did not invalidate the

appeal waiver. See id. at 987-88. 

DISMISSED.
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 224

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should 

provide adequate funding to protect the integrity of the Frederick Douglass National Historic Site. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2003

Mr. HASTERT (for himself, Mr. BLUNT, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. REYNOLDS, 

Mr. WELLER, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. POMBO, and Mr. 

PORTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

Congress should provide adequate funding to protect the 

integrity of the Frederick Douglass National Historic 

Site.

Whereas Frederick Douglass freed himself from slavery and 

through decades of tireless efforts helped to free millions 

more; 

Whereas, as a major stationmaster on the Underground Railroad, Frederick Douglass directly helped hundreds on 

their way to freedom through his adopted home city of 

Rochester, New York; 

Whereas Frederick Douglass learned to write and do arithmetic on his own initiative; 
2

•HRES 224 IH 

Whereas, as a publisher of the North Star and Frederick 

Douglass’ Paper, Frederick Douglass brought news of the 

antislavery movement to thousands of people; 

Whereas Frederick Douglass helped recruit African-American 

troops for the Union Army and his personal relationship 

with Abraham Lincoln helped to persuade the President 

to make Emancipation a cause of the Civil War; 

Whereas, in 1872, Frederick Douglass moved to Washington, 

DC, where he initially served as publisher of the New National Era, intending to carry forward the work of elevating the position of African Americans in the postEmancipation period; and 

Whereas Frederick Douglass also served briefly as President 

of the Freedmen’s National Bank and subsequently in 

various national service positions, including United States 

Marshal for the District of Columbia and diplomatic positions in Haiti and the Dominican Republic: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Congress should provide adequate fund3 ing to protect the integrity of the Frederick Douglass Na4 tional Historic Site.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7224
LORENZO V. CARRILLO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-37-2) Submitted: November 18, 1997 Decided: December 2, 1997 Before ERVIN, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lorenzo V. Carrillo, Appellant Pro Se. John Kenneth Byrum, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Carrillo v. Angelone , No. CA-97-37-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18,UNITED STATES CODE)


Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers of  Alternative  Technology  Resources,  Inc.,  a Delaware
corporation (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  December  31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the " Form10-Q") that, to the
best of their knowledge,:

     (1) the Form10-Q fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: February 14, 2003                        /S/ JEFFREY S. MCCORMICK
                                                ------------------------
                                                Jeff McCormick
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Dated: February 14, 2003                        /S/ JAMES W. CAMERON, JR.
                                                -------------------------
                                                James W. Cameron, Jr.
                                                Chief Financial Officer
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 79 toRegistration Statement No. 002-33371 on Form N-1A of our report dated September 10, 2014, relating to the financial statementsand financial highlights of The Income Fund of America appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of suchRegistration Statement, and to the references to us under the headings “Financial highlights” in the Prospectus and“Independent registered public accounting firm” and “Prospectuses, reports to shareholders and proxy statements”in the Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement.

 

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Costa Mesa, California

September 29, 2014
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549





FORM
8-K





CURRENT
REPORT


Pursuant
to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of
report (Date of earliest event reported): March 10, 2010





Vail Resorts,
Inc.


(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)





Delaware
            
            001-09614
            
            51-0291762(State
      or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
            
            (Commission
      File Number)
            
            (IRS
      Employer Identification No.)390
      Interlocken Crescent
              Broomfield,
      Colorado
            
            80021(Address
      of Principal Executive Offices)
            
            (Zip
      Code)Registrant's
      telephone number, including area code:
            
            (303)
      404-1800





(Former
      Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions:


[  ]
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)


[  ]
Soliciting materials pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)


[  ]
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[  ]
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))














Item
2.02.  Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On March
10, 2010, Vail Resorts, Inc. issued a press release announcing its results for
the three and six months ended January 31, 2010.  A copy of the press
release is being furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K
and is incorporated herein by reference.





The
information furnished pursuant to this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1, shall
not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into
any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated therein by
reference.





Item
9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(d)
Exhibits.





A list of
exhibits furnished herewith is contained on the Exhibit Index which immediately
precedes such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.











SIGNATURES





Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.





Vail
      Resorts, Inc.Date:
      March 10, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Jeffrey W. JonesJeffrey
      W. JonesSenior
      Executive Vice President and
              Chief
      Financial Officer














EXHIBIT
INDEX





Exhibit No.
            Description99.1
            Press
      Release, dated March 10, 2010, announcing fiscal 2010 second quarter
      results.
##### 



EXHIBIT 7 THE WESTAIM CORPORATION Chief Executive Officers Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Barry M. Heck, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 40-F for the period ended December
31, 2003 of The Westaim Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function): 1




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 7  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 11, 2004 /s/ Barry M. Heck 
 
 2
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John E. Baker, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 13, 2004







/s/ John E. Baker

John E. Baker

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[No. 55276-7-I.

Division One.

December 19, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Virgilio Perez Fajarillo, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 03-1-00185-1, James H. Allendoerfer, J., entered October 12, 2004. *Remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Back to Contents

**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Dennis H. Bunt, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Authentidate Holding Corp.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this ****report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

| b) |      Reserved; |
|----|-----------------------------------------|

c)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date:  | May 16, 2005 | Name:  | /s/ Dennis H. Bunt      |
|--------|--------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |         |   |                    |
|   |         | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----