Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Notices 37253 

Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office 

of Nuclear Material Safety and 

Safeguards (NMSS), U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission (NRC), 

Rockville, MD 20852. Telephone: (301) 

492–3284; fax number: (301) 492–3348; 

e-mail: shana.helton@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I 

Foster Wheeler Environmental 

Corporation (FWENC) is the holder of 

Special Nuclear Materials License No. 

2512 (SNM–2512), issued by the 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC 

or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR part 

72. SNM–2512 authorizes FWENC to 

construct and operate the Idaho Spent 

Fuel (ISF) Facility in accordance with 

the terms and conditions specified 

therein. The yet-to-be constructed ISF 

Facility is an independent spent fuel 

storage installation (ISFSI) which, if 

constructed, will be located adjacent to 

the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) 

Idaho Nuclear Technology and 

Engineering Center site on the Idaho 

National Laboratory grounds in Idaho. 

II 

By application dated May 30, 2008, as 

supplemented by letter dated June 8, 

2009 (Agencywide Documents Access 

and Management System [ADAMS] 

Accession Nos. ML081630246 and 

ML091660593, respectively), DOE 

submitted a request, to NRC, for 

approval of a proposed direct transfer of 

SNM–2512, under section 184 of the 

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended 

(AEA), and 10 CFR 72.50. 

SNM–2512 was issued to FWENC to 

construct and operate the ISF Facility 

ISFSI. As of this date, no facility has 

been constructed, but FWENC continues 

to hold SNM–2512. The proposed 

license transfer would result in DOE 

holding SNM–2512. The application 

also requested a conforming license 

amendment to reflect the proposed 

transfer of SNM License No. 2512 to 

DOE. No physical changes to the ISF 

Facility ISFSI design or operational 

changes were proposed in the 

application. 

Approval of the application was 

requested pursuant to section 184 of the 

AEA, and 10 CFR 72.50. Notice of 

consideration of approval of the 

application and an opportunity for a 

hearing was published in the Federal 

Register on, February 25, 2009 (74 FR 

8587). No hearing requests or written 

comments were received. The June 8, 

2009, supplement, which was not 

identified in the Federal Register 

notice, provided a revision to Chapter 9 

of the Safety Analysis Report. The 

revision delineates a full construction/ 

operating organization, pending a 

decision by DOE to proceed with the 

deployment of the ISF Facility ISFSI. 

This revision to the organizational 

description has been determined to be 

administrative in nature and not to 

present any safety issue. 

The Commission’s approval of this 

direct transfer of SNM–2512, and any 

related, conforming license amendments 

to SNM–2512, are categorically 

excluded from further environmental 

review, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(c)(21). 

Under 10 CFR 72.50, no license nor 

any part included in a license issued 

under 10 CFR part 72 for an ISFSI shall 

be transferred, assigned, or in any 

manner disposed of, either voluntarily 

or involuntarily, directly or indirectly, 

through transfer of control of the license 

to any person, unless the Commission 

gives its consent in writing. Upon 

review of the information submitted in 

the application and other information 

before the Commission, the NRC staff 

has determined that the direct transfer 

of control of SNM–2512, as described 

above, is consistent with applicable 

provisions of the law, and the 

regulations and orders issued by the 

Commission. These findings are 

supported by a Safety Evaluation dated 

July 17, 2009 (ADAMS No. 

ML091940481). 

III 

Accordingly, pursuant to sections 

161b, 161i, and 184 of the AEA, 42 USC 

2201(b), 2201(i), and 2234, and 10 CFR 

72.50, the Commission gives notice that 

it has issued an order (Order) approving 

DOE’s application dated May 30, 2008, 

as supplemented by letter dated June 8, 

2009, for the direct transfer of SNM– 

2512 from FWENC to DOE, and for 

conforming license amendments. 

The Order is effective upon issuance. 

For further details, see the application 

dated May 30, 2008, as supplemented 

by letter dated June 8, 2009; the safety 

evaluation report; and the Order 

(ADAMS Nos. ML081630246, 

ML091660593, ML091940481, and 

ML091940453, respectively). These 

documents are available for public 

inspection at the Commission’s Public 

Document Room (PDR), located at One 

White Flint North, Public File Area O1 

F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 

Rockville, Maryland, and accessible 

electronically from the ADAMS Public 

Electronic Reading Room on the Internet 

at the NRC Web site, http:// 

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. 

Persons who do not have access to 

ADAMS, or who encounter problems in 

accessing the documents located in 

ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR 

Reference staff, by telephone, at 1–800– 

397–4209, 301–415–4737, or, by e-mail, 

to pdr@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day 

of July 2009. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Michael F. Weber, 

Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety 

and Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. E9–17901 Filed 7–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Sunshine Federal Register Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission. 

DATE: Weeks of July 27, August 3, 10, 

17, 24, 31, 2009. 

PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference 

Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland. 

STATUS: Public and Closed. 

Week of July 27, 2009 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of July 27, 2009. 

Week of August 3, 2009—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of August 3, 2009. 

Week of August 10, 2009—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of August 10, 2009. 

Week of August 17, 2009—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of August 17, 2009. 

Week of August 24, 2009—Tentative 

There are no meetings scheduled for 

the week of August 24, 2009. 

Week of August 31, 2009—Tentative 

Thursday, September 3, 2009 

9:30 a.m.—Meeting with Organization 

of Agreement States (OAS) and 

Conference of Radiation Control 

Program Directors (CRCPD) (Public 

Meeting) (Contact: Andrea Jones, 

301 415–2309). 

This meeting will be webcast live at 

the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov. 

* * * * * 

The schedule for Commission 

meetings is subject to change on short 

notice. To verify the status of meetings, 

call (recording)—(301) 415–1292. 

Contact person for more information: 

Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415–1651. 

* * * * * 

Additional Information 

Affirmation of Southern Nuclear 

Operating Co. (Vogtle Electric 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

37254 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Notices 

1Notice of United States Postal Service Filing of 

Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited Package 

Services 1 Negotiated Service Agreement, July 16, 

2009 (Notice). 

2See Docket No. CP2008–4, Notice of United 

States Postal Service of Governors’ Decision 

Establishing Prices and Classifications for Global 

Expedited Package Services Contents, May 20, 

2008. 

3See Docket No. CP2008–5, Order Concerning 

Global Expedited Package Services Contracts, June 

27, 2008, at 7 (Order No. 86). 

Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4), LBP– 

09–3 (Ruling on Standing and 

Contention Admissibility); Virginia 

Electric and Power Co. (North Anna 

Unit 3), LBP–08–15 (Ruling on Standing 

and Contention Admissibility) 

tentatively scheduled on July 23, 2009, 

has been postponed. 

* * * * * 

The NRC Commission Meeting 

Schedule can be found on the Internet 

at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policymaking/schedule.html. 

* * * * * 

The NRC provides reasonable 

accommodation to individuals with 

disabilities where appropriate. If you 

need a reasonable accommodation to 

participate in these public meetings, or 

need this meeting notice or the 

transcript or other information from the 

public meetings in another format (e.g. 

braille, large print), please notify the 

NRC’s Disability Program Coordinator, 

Rohn Brown, at 301–492–2279, TDD: 

301–415–2100, or by e-mail at 

rohn.brown@nrc.gov. Determinations on 

requests for reasonable accommodation 

will be made on a case-by-case basis. 

* * * * * 

This notice is distributed 

electronically to subscribers. If you no 

longer wish to receive it, or would like 

to be added to the distribution, please 

contact the Office of the Secretary, 

Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969), 

or send an e-mail to 

darlene.wright@nrc.gov. 

Dated: July 23, 2009. 

Rochelle C. Bavol, 

Office of the Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–17997 Filed 7–24–09; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket No. CP2009–52; Order No. 253] 

Global Expedited Package Services 

Contract 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service request to 

add a Global Expedited Package 

Services 1 contract to the Competitive 

Product List. This notice addresses 

procedural steps associated with these 

filings. 

DATES: Comments are due July 31, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http:// 

www.prc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

202–789–6820 and 

stephen.sharfman@prc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On July 21, 2009, the Postal Service 

filed a notice announcing that it has 

entered into an additional Global 

Expedited Package Services 1 (GEPS 1) 

contract.1 GEPS 1 provides volumebased incentives for mailers that send 

large volumes of Express Mail 

International (EMI) and/or Priority Mail 

International (PMI). The Postal Service 

believes the instant contract is 

functionally equivalent to previously 

submitted GEPS 1 contracts, and is 

supported by the Governors’ Decision 

filed in Docket No. CP2008–4.2 Notice at 

1. It further notes that in Order No. 86, 

which established GEPS 1 as a product, 

the Commission held that additional 

contracts may be included as part of the 

GEPS 1 product if they meet the 

requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633, and if 

they are functionally equivalent to the 

initial GEPS 1 contract filed in Docket 

No. CP2008–5.3 Notice at 1. 

The instant contract. The Postal 

Service filed the instant contract 

pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, 

the Postal Service contends that the 

contract is in accordance with Order No. 

86. The Postal Service states that the 

instant contract replaces the contract for 

the customer in Docket No. CP2008–13, 

which will end on August 31, 2009. Id. 

at 2. It submitted the contract and 

supporting material under seal, and 

attached a redacted copy of the contract 

and certified statement required by 39 

CFR 3015.5(c)(2) to the Notice as 

Attachments 1 and 2, respectively. Id. at 

1–2. The term of the instant contract is 

1 year from the date the Postal Service 

notifies the customer that all necessary 

regulatory approvals have been 

received. 

The Notice advances reasons why the 

instant GEPS 1 contract fits within the 

Mail Classification Schedule language 

for GEPS 1. The Postal Service asserts 

that the instant contract is functionally 

equivalent to the GEPS 1 contracts filed 

previously. It states that in Governors’ 

Decision No. 08–7, a pricing formula 

and classification system were 

established to ensure that each contract 

meets the statutory and regulatory 

requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633. The 

Postal Service contends that the instant 

contract demonstrates its functional 

equivalence with the previous GEPS 1 

contracts because of several factors: The 

customers are small or medium-sized 

businesses that mail directly to foreign 

destinations using EMI and/or PMI, the 

contract term of 1 year applies to all 

GEPS 1 contracts, the contracts have 

similar cost and market characteristics, 

and each requires payment through 

permit imprint. Id. at 4. It asserts that 

even though prices may be different 

based on volume or postage 

commitments made by the customers, or 

updated costing information, these 

differences do not affect the contracts’ 

functional equivalency because the 

GEPS 1 contracts share similar cost 

attributes and methodology. Id. at 4–5. 

The Postal Service also identifies 

several other contractual differences 

including provisions that clarify the 

availability of other Postal Service 

products and services, exclude certain 

flat rate products from the mail 

qualifying for discounts, simplify 

mailing notice requirements, modify 

mail tender locations, clarify the 

mailer’s volume and revenue 

commitment in the event of early 

termination, and modify the original 

GEPS 1 agreement to reflect changes 

unrelated to the mailers or negotiations 

of either party’s obligations under the 

agreement. Id. at 5–6. 

The Postal Service states that these 

differences related to a particular mailer 

are ‘‘incidental differences’’ and do not 

change the conclusion that these 

agreements are functionally equivalent 

in all substantive aspects. Id. at 6. 

The Postal Service requests that this 

contract be included within the GEPS 1 

product. Id. at 7. 

The Postal Service maintains that 

certain portions of the contract and 

certified statement required by 39 CFR 

3015.5(c)(2), names of GEPS 1 

customers, related financial 

information, portions of the certified 

statement which contain costs and 

pricing as well as the accompanying 

analyses that provide prices, terms, 

conditions, and financial projections 

should remain under seal. Id. at 3. 

II. Notice of Filing 

The Commission establishes Docket 

No. CP2009–52 for consideration of 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES