alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,762,164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,278,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (163,884)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,417,626
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,416,089
<PP&E>                                       1,982,353
<DEPRECIATION>                               (733,227)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,671,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,533,680
<BONDS>                                        760,265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           341
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,676,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,671,507
<SALES>                                      7,899,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,899,806
<CGS>                                        6,195,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,019,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (347,693)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,504
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (217,758)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (117,431)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (347,693)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.



By:

/s/ Robert L. Howard-AndersonName:

Robert L. Howard-AndersonTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Occam Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeanne Seeley, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, based on my knowledge, the information contained in this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

/s/ JEANNE SEELEY Jeanne Seeley Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 2, 2009


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Occam Networks, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Ronald L. Rubin, Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and  2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: May 11, 2007 /s/ Ronald L. Rubin   Ronald L. Rubin
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 702 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 702

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase the Federal share 
   for certain safety and other projects on energy impacted highways.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

  Mr. Rahall introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase the Federal share 
   for certain safety and other projects on energy impacted highways.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Impacted Road Relief Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED FEDERAL SHARE FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS ON ENERGY IMPACTED 
              ROADS.

    Section 120(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking in the subsection heading ``Safety'';
            (2) by striking ``The Federal share'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) Safety projects.--The Federal share payable'';
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Projects on energy impacted roads.--The Federal share 
        payable on account of any project to reconstruct, resurface, 
        restore, and rehabilitate any highway which the Secretary 
        determines, at the request of a State, is incurring a 
        substantial use as a result of transportation activities to 
        meet national energy requirements and will continue to incur 
        such use may amount to 95 percent of the cost of such 
        project.''; and
            (4) by aligning paragraph (1), as designated by paragraph 
        (2) of this subsection, with paragraph (2), as added by 
        paragraph (3) of this subsection.
                                 <all>
```
#### V. O. MACHINOIMPORT v. CLARK EQUIPMENT CO. et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Nov. 15, 1951.

See also, D.C., 11 F.R.D. 55.

*192Wolf, Popper, Ross & Wolf, New York City, for plaintiff.

Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Hadley, New York City, for defendants.

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This is a motion under Rule 37(b), Fed. Rules Civ-.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A., 'by the defendant Clark Equipment Company for a dismissal, as to it, of plaintiff’s complaint and a direction of a default judgment in said defendant’s favor on a counterclaim. The basis of the motion is plaintiff’s failure to produce for examination officers of plaintiff pursuant to an order of this court entered April 18, 1951, which denied a motion of plaintiff that the taking of depositions in accordance with a notice theretofore served be limited and modified so that the depositions would be taken on written interrogatories under letters rogatory.

The plaintiff has not opposed the motion for a dismissal of the complaint but asks that the dismissal be without prejudice and opposes the motion for the direction of a judgment for defendant on the counterclaim.

The basis for the plea that the dismissal be without prejudice is that the failure to produce the witnesses for examination was not willful. The only reason advanced for such failure is that the production of the witnesses would have deprived plaintiff of its right to review, on appeal from the final judgment, the order for their production.

It would be hard to imagine a default more willful. What plaintiff seeks to do is, in substance, to obtain an interlocutory review of the order for the examination of the witnesses. A dismissal without prejudice' would have substantially that effect since, if plaintiff on appeal were not able to substantiate its position that the order for the examination was erroneous, all it would have to do would be to start a new action and have its officers submit to an examination in that action. 'Congress has not seen fit to provide for such an interlocutory review and there is no reason why the courts should afford it under the guise of a ruling that a -default for the purpose of obtaining such an interlocutory review is not willful. The dismissal of the complaint will therefore be with prejudice.

Plaintiff’s argument that there should not be judgment on the counterclaim is based on the position that the testimony to be elicited from the recalcitrant witnesses would not be material on the issue raised by the counterclaim. The motion papers, however, indicate that the testimony of the witnesses would be material on the counterclaim issue. Judgment will be directed for the defendant Clark Equipment Company on its counterclaim, the amount to be determined by an inquest.

Settle order on notice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,495
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,835
<INVENTORY>                                     22,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,321
<PP&E>                                          50,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,275
<BONDS>                                            995
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     76,202
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                   (108,154)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,229
<SALES>                                         89,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,883
<CGS>                                           75,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,147
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (39,959)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (39,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (39,959)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.85)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000811831
<NAME> NORTHEAST BANCORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,708,584
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         341,553
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                35,753
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 28,896,205
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    188,480,987
<ALLOWANCE>                                 2,483,000,
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             238,459,045
<DEPOSITS>                                 142,959,996
<SHORT-TERM>                                48,293,012
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,503,491
<LONG-TERM>                                 26,959,468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,999,980
<COMMON>                                     1,195,942
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,547,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             238,459,045
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,197,097
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,248,022
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               189,104
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,634,223
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,073,287
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,951,017
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,683,206
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  289,257
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             124,541
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,162,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,127,847
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     711,421
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   711,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.134
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,221,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               341,215
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                648,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,549,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  386,960
<RECOVERIES>                                    31,703
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,483,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           358,230
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      2,124,770
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 141 (Friday, July 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17685]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices, Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. E9-17111 published on pages 
35190 anbd 35191 of the issue for Monday, July 20, 2009.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City heading, the entry 
for Central Bancorp, Inc., Colorado Springs, Colorado, is revised to 
read as follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Central Bancorp, Inc., Colorado Springs, Colorado; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Farmers and Stockmens Bank of Clayton, Clayton, New Mexico, and The 
Citizens National Bank of Akron, Akron, Colorado.
    Applicant also has applied to retain voting shares of Elite 
Properties of America II, Inc.; CB&T Mortgage, LLC; and CB&T Wealth 
Management, all of Colorado Springs, Colorado; Corundum Trust Company, 
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and thereby engage in, extending credit and 
servicing of loans, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1); financial and 
investment advisory activities, pursuant to sections 225.28(b)(6)(i) 
and (b)(6)(v); and trust activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(5) 
of Regulation Y.
    Comments on this application must be received by August 13, 2009.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 21, 2009.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-17685 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
AMENDMENT TO CUSTODIAN AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment, dated as of May 1, 2015, amendsthe Global Custody Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2006 as amended to date (the "Custodian Agreement"), by and betweenState Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Bank”) and each of the investment companies and other pooled investment vehicles(which may be organized as corporations, business or other trusts, limited liability companies, partnerships or other entities)managed by Capital Research and Management Company and listed on Appendix A thereto, as amended from time to time (each, a "Customer").

 

The Bank and each Customer hereby agree to replacethe existing Appendix A to the Custodian Agreement with the updated appendix below, to reflect all Customers who are parties tothe Custodian Agreement as of such date.

 

APPENDIX A

 

CUSTOMERS AND PORTFOLIOS

 

Dated as of May 1, 2015

 

The following is a list of Customers and theirrespective Portfolios for which the Bank shall serve under this Agreement.

 

 

*[Signature page follows]*

* *

* *

**

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of theCustomers and the Bank has executed this Appendix A as of the date first-written above. Execution of this Appendix A by more thanone Customer shall not create a contractual or other obligation between or among such Customers (or between or among their respectiveportfolios) and this Appendix shall constitute a separate agreement between the Bank and each Customer on behalf of itself or eachof its portfolios.

 

 

Each of the Customers Listedon Appendix A 	

Above,on behalf of Itself or

its Listed Portfolios 		

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 305

Congratulating the New Jersey Devils for winning the 2003 Stanley Cup 

championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2003

Mr. ROTHMAN (for himself, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. 

LOBIONDO, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. SAXTON, 

Mr. PAYNE, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. HOLT, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, 

and Mr. MENENDEZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the New Jersey Devils for winning the 2003 

Stanley Cup championship.

Whereas on June 9, 2003, the New Jersey Devils won their 

3rd Stanley Cup championship in 9 years by defeating 

the Anaheim Mighty Ducks, 4 games to 3; 

Whereas the New Jersey Devils set a National Hockey 

League record by winning 12 home games in a single 

playoff year; 

Whereas New Jersey Devils’ goaltender Martin Brodeur tied 

a Stanley Cup finals record with 3 shutouts in the finals 

and established a record for the most shutouts in a single 

playoff year with 7; 
2

•HRES 305 IH 

Whereas team captain Scott Stevens set a National Hockey 

League record for playing in his 233rd playoff game as 

a defenseman; and 

Whereas the determination and teamwork shown by the New 

Jersey Devils in winning the Stanley Cup embody the 

best of the work ethic and unity of the people of New 

Jersey: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the New Jersey Devils hockey 

3 team for winning the 2003 Stanley Cup champion4 ship; and 

5 (2) recognizes the achievements of the New Jer6 sey Devils players, coaches, owners, and staff who 

7 were instrumental in bringing the Stanley Cup back 

8 to New Jersey.

Æ
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF NEW VALLEY

     The following is a list of the active subsidiaries of New Valley as of
March 24, 2000, indicating the jurisdiction of incorporation of each and the
names under which such subsidiaries conduct business.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
               NAME OF BUSINESS (% OWNERSHIP)                 JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
               ------------------------------                 -----------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Ladenburg, Thalmann Group Inc. (100%).......................            Delaware
Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co. Inc. (80.1%)......................            Delaware
Thinkcorp Holding Corporation (72.7%).......................            Delaware
BrookeMil Ltd. (99.1%)......................................         Cayman Islands
ALKI Corp. (100%)...........................................            Delaware
</TABLE>

     Not included above are other subsidiaries which, if considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary,
as such term is defined by Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
#### Gurr *v.*Gurr.

Atkinson, J. — A writ of *habeas corpus*having been sued out before the ordinary for the custody of a minor child by its father against its mother, the parents at the time living in a state of separation, and the ordinary having awarded the custody of the child to the father, and this judgment having been immediately executed, after which the mother presented to the judge of the superior court a petition for *certiorari*to review all the proceedings in the ease had before the ordinary, it was error, after sanctioning the petition for *certiorari,*to add to the sanction an order directing that the sheriff restore the child in dispute to the custody of its mother, the plaintiff in *certiorari,*the judge having no power or authority to grant such order. *Mayor & Council of Macon*v. *Shaw,*14 *Ga.*162; *Lindsey*v. *Lindsey, Ibid.*657; *Taylor*v. *Gay,*20 *Ga.*77; *Board of Commissioners of Burke County*v. *Wimberly,*55 *Ga.*570; *Seamans*v. *King,*79 *Ga.*613.

February 27,1895.

*Certiorari.*Before Judge Fish. Houston county. May 28, 1894.

Louis L. Brown, for plaintiff in error.

*Judgment reversed.*