alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RETURN PATH, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Cisco Ironport Systems, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2012-1460.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 11, 2013.

*981Daryl L. Joseffer, King & Spalding, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Adam M. Conrad; Bruce W. Baber, Natasha H. Moffitt and Russell E. Blythe, of Atlanta, GA.

Matthew C. Gaudet, Duane Morris, LLP, of Atlanta, GA, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were L. Norwood Jameson and John R. Gibson. Of counsel on the brief was Kenneth L. Bressler, Blank Rome, LLP, of New York, NY.

LOURIE, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
exhibit_4a-84.htm










Exhibit 4. (a) 84


 


[State Emblem]


 


The State of Israel


Ministry of Communications


 


General License for Partner Communications Ltd. for the Provision of


Mobile Radio Telephone (MRT) Services using the Cellular Method


 


Amendment No. 68







By virtue of the authority of the Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the Communications Law (Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, and after having given Partner Communications Company Ltd. (hereinafter: “Partner”) the opportunity to present their arguments, I hereby amend the General License for the provision of mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the cellular method granted to Partner on 7 April 1998,  as follows:







Amendment of Article 45








	
  

	
1.

	
After sub-section 45.1 (b) shall come:













	
  

	
(b1)

	
Frequency bands that have been non-exclusively been allocated for its use as of February 25, 2010, in accordance with the rules and limitations that will be set by the Director: 912.6 Mhz to 915 Mhz and 957.6 Mhz to 960 Mhz1.







 


(30 December 2012)







     (sgd)                                           


              ________________                                                                                     


             Moshe Cachalon


             Minister of Communications                                                      

















1 These frequency bands have been used by the Licensee since 1999.
Unassociated Document


EXHIBIT 10.28




SUPPLEMENT NO. 4 TO SIXTH AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


THIS SUPPLEMENT No. 4 TO SIXTH AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE by and between BLINK COUTURE, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Maker”) and REGENT PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company (the “Payee”) entered into as of December 31, 2012, supplements and amends that certain Sixth Amendment and Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note dated as of January 31, 2012, as previously supplemented by Supplement No. 1 to Sixth Amendment and Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note, dated as of April 30, 2012, Supplement No. 2 to Sixth Amendment and Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note, dated as of July 31, 2012 and Supplement No. 3 to Sixth Amendment and Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note, dated as of October 31, 2012 (the “Amendment and Note Restatement”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Amendment and Note Restatement.







For value received, the Maker and Payee hereby agree, effective as of the date hereof, that the following provisions shall supplement and become part of the Amendment and Note Restatement:







1.           Additional Advances.  The Parties hereby agree that during the period from November 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012, the Payee has made additional advances to the Maker, in the aggregate amount of $11,075, in payment of the Maker’s operating expenses during that period, so that effective as of December 31, 2012, the total outstanding principal amount due and payable pursuant to the Note is $385,797.







2.           No Further Changes; Full Force and Effect.  The additional advances described in Paragraph 1 above reflect all changes to the Amendment and Note Restatement. All other terms of the Amendment and Note Restatement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect, unless and until further supplemented or amended hereafter.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has caused this Supplement No. 3 to Sixth Amendment and Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first written above.


 




	 	BLINK COUTURE, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Lawrence Field    	 
	 	 	
Name: Lawrence Field


Title: President & CEO

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	REGENT PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Cynthia S. Field    	 
	 	 	
Name:  Cynthia S. Field


Title: Secretary
# 19QRTL4_00
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Watsco, Inc. (Watsco) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ana M. Menendez, the Chief Financial Officer of Watsco,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Watsco.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ana M. MenendezAna M. MenendezChief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Watsco and will be retained by Watsco and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Watsco for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 815 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 815

  To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a 
        study with respect to aneurysms, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2003

  Mr. King of New York (for himself and Mr. Gutierrez) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a 
        study with respect to aneurysms, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aneurysm Awareness Act''.

SEC. 2. HHS STUDY ON ANEURYSMS.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
conduct a study on the following matters with respect to occurrence of 
aneurysms in the population of the United States:
            (1) The incidence of aneurysms.
            (2) The most common signs and symptoms of aneurysms.
            (3) Characteristics of individuals at the highest risk for 
        aneurysms.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the 
study conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 3. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of the Congress that there should be an increased 
awareness of and research pertaining to aneurysms.
                                 <all>
```
DENMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Denmark Bancshares, Inc. ("DBI"), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DBI for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DBI.



|/s/ John P. Olsen
|-----------------
|John P. Olsen,   
|President and CEO
|                 



|/s/ Dennis J. Heim               
|---------------------------------
|Dennis J. Heim                   
|Vice President, CFO and Treasurer
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|Date:  August 6, 2010
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 7348

ISAAC ROMELL WILLIAMS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN OF MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 2:20

- cv - 04268

- JFA )

Submitted : March 29, 2024 Decided: May 16, 2024

Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Isaac Romell Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7348 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Isaac Romell Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Williams’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifi cate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a p risoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constituti onal right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slac k v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

ar e adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7348 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 108

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that India should 

be a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2003

Mr. PALLONE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

India should be a permanent member of the United 

Nations Security Council.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that India should be a permanent member of 

3 the United Nations Security Council.

Æ
[No. 32916-6-II.

Division Two.

December 13, 2005.]

#### Alan A. Fredrickson et al., *Appellants,*v. Bertolino’s Tacoma, Inc., et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 04-2-04931-3, Lisa R. Worswick, J., entered March 2, 2005. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Van Deren A.C.J., and Houghton, J. Now published at 131 Wn. App. 183.
No. 893.

#### Shaver *v.*Fidelity Bankers Trust Co., Trustee.

May 20, 1946.

327 U. S. 809.
Order entered August 3, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-15-00245-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13-00345W



### ORDER Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the April 24, 2015 motion of

Frank Adler to withdraw as Father’s appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk of the

Court to remove Frank Adle r as counsel of record for Father. We further DIRECT the Clerk of

the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to Jorge Alberto

Campuzano, 409 West Brown St., Apt. A, Ennis, Texas 75119.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00047-CV

CHARLES MOORHEAD

v.

DAHLIA REYES, ET AL.

On Appeal from the

343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-18-1160-CV-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 6, 2019
**Exhibit      10.20**

**VAIL      RESORTS, INC.**

**RESTRICTED      SHARE [UNIT] AGREEMENT**

----

----

|   | If                to the Company: | Vail                Resorts, Inc.         |
|--------|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                              | 390                Interlocken Crescent   |
|   |                              | Suite                1000                 |
|   |                              | Broomfield,                Colorado 80021 |
|   |                              | Attention:                General Counsel |

|   | If                to the Employee: | At                the Employee’s most recent address shown on the Company’s corporate                records, or at any other address which the Employee may specify in                a                notice delivered to the Company in the manner set forth                herein. |
|--------|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**[Signature      Page Follows]**

----

**VAIL      RESORTS, INC.**

**EMPLOYEE:**

----
---

Exhibit
32.2








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Erin D.
Pickens, as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
6, 2009







/s/
Erin D. Pickens


Erin D.
Pickens


Senior
Vice President &


Chief
Financial Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Order entered June 1 9 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00650 - CV No. 05 - 18 - 00651 - CV KEVIN HINDS, Appellant

V. STATE BAR OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 17 - 13392



### O RDER Before the Court are appellant’s June 15, 2018 requests for extension of time to file the clerk’s record and reporter’s record in each of these appeals

. We no te the clerk’s record has been filed in each appeal and the reporter’s record s are not due until June 25, 2018. Accordingly, we DENY as moot the request s as to the clerk’s record s and DENY as premature the request s as to the reporter’s record s . /s/ ADA B ROWN JUSTICE
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 185

Extending the period of availability of amounts for continuing expenses of 

standing and select committees of the House through May 9, 2003. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2003

Mr. NEY (for himself and Mr. LARSON of Connecticut) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

APRIL 9, 2003

Committee on House Administration discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Extending the period of availability of amounts for continuing expenses of standing and select committees of 

the House through May 9, 2003.

1 Resolved, That House Resolution 163 (agreed to 

2 March 26, 2003) is amended by striking ‘‘April 11, 2003’’ 

3 and inserting ‘‘May 9, 2003’’.

Æ
Opinion issued December 10 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 19 - 00187 - CR

——————————— SHANE VINCENT SMITH , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1581902

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Shane Vincent Smith , was indicted for the felony offense of assault of a family member. See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE § 22.01(b)(2). Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement with the State, appellant pleaded guilty to the reduced misdemeanor charge of assault of a family member with an agreed punishment recommendation2

of one year of incarceration in county jail. The trial court accepted the plea agreement, found appellant guilty, and assessed his punishment at one year of incarceration in county jail. The trial court certified that this case is a plea

- bargain case and appellant has no right of appeal. Appellant filed a notice of appeal and,

n otwithstanding the trial court’s certification, was appointed counsel on appeal. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. More than ten days have passed and appellant failed to respond to the motion to dismiss. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.3

. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s
p ermission to appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (T ex. Crim. App. 2005). T he trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea

- bargain case and that appellant ha s no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); Dears , 154 S. W.3d at 615

. The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 615. Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having3

jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”). Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion and dismiss th e appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as
moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Just ices Landau and Hightower

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 813

To rescind the Department of Veterans Affairs memorandum of July 18, 

2002, in which Directors of health service networks in the Department 

of Veterans Affairs are directed to ensure that no marketing activities 

to enroll new veterans occur within their networks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. KANJORSKI (for himself, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. PAUL, Ms. MILLENDERMCDONALD, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. BERRY, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. 

FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. FROST, Mr. 

HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. SANDERS, and Mr. WEXLER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To rescind the Department of Veterans Affairs memorandum 

of July 18, 2002, in which Directors of health service 

networks in the Department of Veterans Affairs are directed to ensure that no marketing activities to enroll 

new veterans occur within their networks.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Outreach 

5 Protection Act’’. 
2

•HR 813 IH 

1 SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF2 FAIRS MEMORANDUM. 

3 (a) RESCISSION OF MEMORANDUM.—The memo4 randum of the Department of Veterans Affairs dated July 

5 18, 2002, from the Deputy Under Secretary for Health 

6 for Operations and Management with the subject ‘‘Status 

7 of VHA Enrollment and Associated Issues’’ is hereby re8 scinded. Marketing activities of Directors of health service 

9 networks (known as ‘‘Veterans Integrated Service Net10 works’’) of the Department of Veterans Affairs to enroll 

11 new veterans within their respective networks shall be car12 ried out without regard to such memorandum. 

13 (b) FUNDING LIMITATION.—No funds available to 

14 the Department of Veterans Affairs may be used to carry 

15 out the memorandum referred to in subsection (a) or oth16 erwise to implement the policy contained in that memo17 randum.

Æ