alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 142 (Monday, July 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH.
    Date: August 17, 2009.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health Natcher Building, 45 Center 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Penny W. Burgoon, PhD, Senior Assistant to the 
Deputy Director, Office of the Director, National Institutes of 
Health, 1 Center Drive, Building 1, Room 109, Bethesda, MD 20892. 
301-451-5870. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#593b2c2b3e3636372919363d77373031773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9dffe8effaf2f2f3edddf2f9b3f3f4f5b3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.14, 
Intramural Research Training Award; 93.22, Clinical Research Loan 
Repayment Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 
93.232, Loan Repayment Program for Research Generally; 93.39, 
Academic Research Enhancement Award; 93.936, NIH Acquired 
Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan Repayment Program; 93.187, 
Undergraduate Scholarship Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged 
Backgrounds, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 20, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17729 Filed 7-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Opinion issued October 15, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 1 9 - 00 09 9 - C R

——————————— JARVIS MARQUIS TILLM AN , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1 580017

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Jarvis Marquis Tillman, has filed three pro se letter

- motion s to dismiss, stating that he would like to dismiss his appeal upon receipt of this letter and to expedite the mandate. The Court construes the letter

- motions filed by2

appellant as a motion to dismiss his appeal and to expedite the mandate. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a), 18.1(c). Ten days have passed with no response. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 10.3(a). No opinion has issued. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a). Although appellant’s motion to dismiss is only signed by the pro se appellant and does not contain a certificate o f service or conference, it was filed after appellant’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw with an Anders brief, both of which contain counsel’s signature, and after the State filed a waiver of its right to respond to the Anders brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Thus, construing the various motions together with the State’s waiver, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rules 10.1 , 18.1(a) , and 42.2(a) in this appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2, 10.1(a) , 18.1 (a), 42.2(a); see also Selph v. State , No. 01

- 16

- 00776

- CR, 2017 WL 2375788 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] June 1, 2017, no pet.). Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss this appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). Further, because the motion to expedite demonstrates good cause to expedite issuance of the mandate, we grant the motion and direct the clerk of this Court to issue the mandate immediately. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 18.1(c). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Lloyd
.3

Do not publish. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 251

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 303) to amend title 10, United 

States Code, to permit retired members of the Armed Forces who have 

a service-connected disability to receive both military retired pay by 

reason of their years of military service and disability compensation 

from the Department of Veterans Affairs for their disability. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2003

Mr. MARSHALL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 303) to amend 

title 10, United States Code, to permit retired members 

of the Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability to receive both military retired pay by reason 

of their years of military service and disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs for their 

disability.

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this 

2 resolution the House shall without intervention of any 

3 point of order consider in the House the bill (H.R. 303) 

4 to amend title 10, United States Code, to permit retired 

5 members of the Armed Forces who have a service-con-
2

HRES 251 IH 

1 nected disability to receive both military retired pay by 

2 reason of their years of military service and disability com3 pensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs for 

4 their disability. The bill shall be considered as read for 

5 amendment. The previous question shall be considered as 

6 ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 

7 passage without intervening motion except: (1) four hours 

8 of debate on the bill equally divided among and controlled 

9 by the chairmen and ranking minority members of the 

10 Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Vet11 erans’ Affairs; (2) an amendment in the nature of a sub12 stitute printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to 

13 clause 8 of rule XVIII, if offered by Representative 

14 Hunter of California or his designee, which shall be con15 sidered as read and shall be separately debatable for one 

16 hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and 

17 an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or 

18 without instructions. 

19 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 303 pursuant 

20 to the first section of this resolution, notwithstanding the 

21 operation of the previous question, the Chair may post22 pone further consideration of the bill to a time designated 

23 by the Speaker on the same legislative day or until the 

24 following legislative day when consideration shall resume 
3

HRES 251 IH 

1 immediately after the third daily order of business under 

2 clause 1 of rule XIV.

Æ
H. Res. 24

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 8, 2003.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

they are hereby, elected Chairmen of the following standing

committees of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Goodlatte of Virginia.

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Young of Florida.

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Hunter of California.

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Nussle of Iowa.

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr.

Boehner of Ohio.

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Tauzin

of Louisiana.

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Oxley of

Ohio.

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Tom Davis

of Virginia.
2

•HRES 24 EH

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Ney of

Ohio.

COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: Mr. Hyde

of Illinois.

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Sensenbrenner of

Wisconsin.

COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES: Mr. Pombo of California.

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Boehlert of New York.

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Manzullo of Illinois.

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT:

Mr. Hefley of Colorado.

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Young of Alaska.

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Chris Smith

of New Jersey.

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS: Mr. Thomas of California.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 21.1


                                        SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                                                                        State or
Entity Name                                               Country      % Owned
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Big Bear Indian Art, LLC                                    Texas        100%
Crown Pointe, Inc.                                       California      100%
Gainesville Outlet Mall, LLC                               Nevada        100%
Gainesville Partners, LLC                                  Nevada        100%
Gainesville Property, LP                                    Texas        100%
Greenbriar Financial Corporation                           Nevada        100%
Kellway Corporation                                         Texas        100%
King City Retirement Corporation                           Oregon        100%
Mesquite, LLC                                              Nevada         60%
Real Estate Investors, LLC                                 Nevada        100%
Retirement Real Estate, Inc.                               Nevada        100%
Senior Living Management, Inc.                             Nevada        100%
Senior Living Management Payroll Company                    Texas        100%
Senior Property Management, Inc.                           Nevada        100%
Senior Property Management- CP, LLC                        Nevada        100%
Senior Property Management- OP, LLC                        Nevada        100%
Senior Property Management- WT, LLC                        Nevada        100%
SLM-Crown Pointe, Inc.                                     Nevada        100%
SLM-Oak Park, Inc.                                         Nevada        100%
SLM-Wedgwood Terrace, Inc.                                 Nevada        100%
Villa Residential Care Homes - Arlington I, LP              Texas         49%
Villa Residential Care Homes - Corpus Christi South, LP     Texas          1%
Villa Residential Care Homes - Fort Worth East, LP          Texas          1%
Villa Residential Care Homes - Granbury, LP                 Texas          1%
Villa Residential Care Homes - Oak Park, LP                 Texas          1%
Wedgwood Retirement Inns, Inc.                           Washington      100%
Wedgwood Terrace, Inc.                                     Nevada        100%
Windsor Group, LLC                                      South Carolina   100%
Windsor House Greenville, LLC                           South Carolina   100%
IV 

House Calendar No. 11

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 139

[Report No. 108–34] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5) to improve patient access 

to health care services and provide improved medical care by reducing 

the excessive burden the liability system places on the health care delivery 

system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2003

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5) to improve 

patient access to health care services and provide improved medical care by reducing the excessive burden 

the liability system places on the health care delivery 

system.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5) to improve 

4 patient access to health care services and provide improved 

5 medical care by reducing the excessive burden the liability 
2

HRES 139 RH 

1 system places on the health care delivery system. The bill 

2 shall be considered as read for amendment. In lieu of the 

3 amendments recommended by the Committees on the Ju4 diciary and on Energy and Commerce now printed in the 

5 bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed 

6 in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 

7 this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The pre8 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, 

9 as amended, to final passage without intervening motion 

10 except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill, as amended, 

11 with 80 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 

12 chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

13 on the Judiciary and 40 minutes equally divided and con14 trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

15 the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one mo16 tion to recommit with or without instructions. 

17 SEC. 2. House Resolution 126 is laid on the table. 

House Calendar No. 11

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 139

[Report No. 108–34] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5) to 

improve patient access to health care services and provide improved medical care by reducing the excessive burden the liability system places on the health care delivery system. 

MARCH 12, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 246

Commemorating the 53rd anniversary of Senator Margaret Chase Smith’s 

‘‘Declaration of Conscience’’ speech in which she defended the American 

rights to free speech and dissent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2003

Mr. ALLEN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Commemorating the 53rd anniversary of Senator Margaret 

Chase Smith’s ‘‘Declaration of Conscience’’ speech in 

which she defended the American rights to free speech 

and dissent.

Whereas, on June 1, 1950, United States Senator Margaret 

Chase Smith, a Republican from Maine, issued her ‘‘Declaration of Conscience’’ in a speech to the Senate, in response to the defamatory accusations that characterized 

the anti-communist crusades of Senator Joseph McCarthy and others; 

Whereas, in the speech, Senator Smith defended the basic 

American principles of ‘‘the right to criticize; the right to 

hold unpopular beliefs; the right to protest; the right of 

independent thought’’, and affirmed that ‘‘the exercise of 
2

•HRES 246 IH 

these rights should not cost one single American citizen 

his reputation or his right to a livelihood’’; 

Whereas history has judged well Senator Smith’s appeal for 

protection of the fundamental American rights of free 

speech and dissent, in contrast to the efforts by Senator 

McCarthy and others to employ questions of people’s patriotism as a political weapon; and 

Whereas, on June 6, 1989, President George H.W. Bush 

awarded Senator Smith the Presidential Medal of Freedom and stated that ‘‘Senator Smith’s finest hour came 

when she issued the ‘Declaration of Conscience’, an historic and courageous speech denouncing McCarthyism, 

and she spoke out when so many others remained silent’’: 

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) commemorates the 53rd anniversary of Sen3 ator Margaret Chase Smith’s ‘‘Declaration of Con4 science’’ speech in which she defended the funda5 mental American rights to criticize, to hold unpopu6 lar beliefs, to protest; and of independent thought; 

7 and 

8 (2) affirms that the principles enunciated in the 

9 ‘‘Declaration of Conscience’’ remain valid today.

Æ
H. Res. 256

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 5, 2003.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1474) to facilitate check truncation by authorizing substitute checks, to foster innovation in the check collection system without mandating receipt of checks in electronic form, and to improve the overall efficiency of the Nation’s payments system, and for other purposes. The first

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order

against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Financial Services.

After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under

the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a sub-
2

•HRES 256 EH

stitute recommended by the Committee on Financial Services

now printed in the bill. Each section of the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as

read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering

an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in

clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House

on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole

to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of

a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit      10.22**

**1.      Share Appreciation Rights Terms.**

----

**2.       Procedure for Share Appreciation Rights Exercise.**

**3.       Payment for Share Appreciation**
**Rights.**

----

**4.       Share Appreciation Rights Not Transferable.**

**5.       Conformity with Plan.**

**6.       Rights of Participants. **

**7.       Withholding of Taxes.**

**8.       Adjustments.**

----

**9.       Notice.**

**10.       Governing Law. **

**11.       Code Section 409A. **

*[Signature      Page Follows]*

----

**To      confirm your understanding and acceptance of the terms and provisions set forth      in this Agreement, please execute the extra copy of this Agreement in the space      below and return it to the attention of the Company's General Counsel at the      address set forth in paragraph 9 above.**

----
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units



 Exhibit 10.5 
 PICO HOLDINGS, INC. 
 NOTICE OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS 
 The Participant has been granted an award of Restricted Stock Units (the “Award”) pursuant to the PICO Holdings, Inc. 2005
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), each of which represents the right to receive on the applicable Settlement Date one (1) share of Common Stock of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), as
follows: 
  

							
	Participant:	  	[Employee Name]	  	Employee ID:	  	[Employee ID]
				
	Grant Date:	  	[Date]	  		  	
		
	Number of Restricted
Stock Units (“RSU’s”):	  	[Number of RSU’s] RSU’s, subject to adjustment as provided by the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Award Agreement”).
		
	Settlement Date:	  	For each RSU, except as otherwise provided by the Award Agreement, the date on which such unit becomes a Vested Unit in accordance with the vesting schedule set forth below; subject,
however, to any later date(s) elected by the Participant under a valid Deferral Election Form approved by the Company.
		
	Vested Units:	  	All RSU’s shall vest on [Date that is 3 years from Grant Date], provided that the Participant’s Service has not terminated prior to the relevant date and, subject to any
earlier vesting provided under the Plan, the Award Agreement or any applicable agreement between the Participant and the Company.

 By their signatures below or by electronic acceptance or authentication in a form authorized by the Company, the
Company and the Participant agree that the Award is governed by this Notice and by the provisions of the Plan and the Award Agreement, both of which are made a part of this document. The Participant represents that he has read and is familiar with
the provisions of the Plan and Award Agreement, and hereby accepts the Award subject to all of its terms and conditions. 
  

					
	PICO HOLDINGS, INC.	  	Participant:
		
	 By:  _________________________________________
	  	
		  	 
		  	Signature
	 Its:  _________________________________________
	  	
		  	 
		  	Date
	 Address:
	  	875 Prospect St., Suite 301	  	
		  		  	 
		  	La Jolla, California 92037-4264	  	Address
		  		  	
		  		  	 

  

	ATTACHMENTS:	2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended to the Grant Date; Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement and Plan Prospectus
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17891]



[[Page 37191]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Board of Advisors (BOA) to the President, Naval 
Postgraduate School (NPS)

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of The Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meeting of the Board of Advisors (BOA) to the President, 
Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) will be held. This meeting will be open 
to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 9, 2009, from 8 
a.m. to 4 p.m. and on Thursday, September 10, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 12 
p.m. Eastern Time Zone.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Office of Naval Research, 
875 N. Randolph Street, Suite 1435, Arlington, VA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jaye Panza, Naval Postgraduate 
School, Monterey, CA, 93943-5001, telephone: (831) 656-2514.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to elicit the 
advice of the Board on the Naval Service's Postgraduate Education 
Program and the collaborative exchange and partnership between NPS and 
the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT). The Board examines the 
effectiveness with which the NPS is accomplishing its mission. To this 
end, the Board will inquire into the curricula; instruction; physical 
equipment; administration; state of morale of the student body, 
faculty, and staff; fiscal affairs; and any other matters relating to 
the operation of the NPS as the Board considers pertinent.
    Individuals without a DoD government/CAC card require an escort at 
the meeting location. For access, information, or to send written 
comments regarding the NPS BOA contact Ms. Jaye Panza, Naval 
Postgraduate School, 1 University Circle, Monterey, CA 93943-5001 or by 
fax (831) 656-3145 by September 1, 2009.

    Dated: July 21, 2009.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-17891 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P