alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 173 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 29, 2003.
Whereas the National Wildlife Refuge System, operated by the United States Fish 
        and Wildlife Service, marked its centennial anniversary on March 14, 
        2003;
Whereas President Theodore Roosevelt stated in 1903 that ``Wild beasts and birds 
        are by right not the property merely of the people who are alive today, 
        but the property of unknown generations, whose belongings we have no 
        right to squander.'';
Whereas the vision of conserving wildlife embraced by President Roosevelt was 
        begun with the plants and animals located on Pelican Island off the East 
        Coast of Florida, and has since flourished across the United States and 
        its territories and possessions, allowing for the preservation of an 
        overwhelmingly vast array of flora and fauna;
Whereas the National Wildlife Refuge System is composed of 540 refuges 
        encompassing nearly 95 million acres, hosts 35 million visitors 
        annually, and benefits from the selfless efforts of 30,000 volunteers; 
        and
Whereas the National Wildlife Refuge System has established refuges in every 
        State in the United States, many of which are reachable within an hour's 
        drive of almost every major city: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the achievements and contributions of the National 
        Wildlife Refuge System on the occasion of its centennial anniversary;
            (2) expresses strong support for the continued success of the 
        National Wildlife Refuge System;
            (3) encourages the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in its 
        efforts to broaden understanding and appreciation for the National 
        Wildlife Refuge System by increasing partnerships on behalf of the 
        refuge system to better manage and monitor wildlife and by continuing 
        its support of wildlife dependent recreational activities as embodied in 
        the Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (Public Law 105-57); and
            (4) reaffirms its commitment to the National Wildlife Refuge System 
        and the conservation of the rich natural heritage of the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
HOLLYER BRADY SMITH & HINES LLP
                                551 Fifth Avenue
                               New York, NY 10176

                               Tel: (212) 818-1110
                               FAX: (212) 818-0494




                                 April 22, 2004






To the Trustees of The Churchill Tax-Free Fund of Kentucky

     We consent to the incorporation by reference into post-effective amendment
No. 25 under the 1933 Act and No. 26 under the 1940 Act of our opinion dated
April 28, 1998.

                          Hollyer Brady Smith & Hines LLP


                            /s/ William L.D. Barrett

                          by__________________________
                                     Partner
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 897

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route of the 

Mississippi River from its headwaters in the State of Minnesota to 

the Gulf of Mexico for study for potential addition to the National 

Trails System as a national scenic trail, national historic trail, or both, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2003

Ms. MCCOLLUM (for herself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BERRY, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. 

BOSWELL, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. KIND, 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. SABO, and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the 

route of the Mississippi River from its headwaters in 

the State of Minnesota to the Gulf of Mexico for study 

for potential addition to the National Trails System as 

a national scenic trail, national historic trail, or both, 

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mississippi River Trail 

5 Study Act’’. 
2

•HR 897 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ROUTE OF THE MISSISSIPPI 

2 RIVER FOR STUDY FOR POTENTIAL ADDI3 TION TO THE NATIONAL TRAILS SYSTEM. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—Section 5(c) of the National 

5 Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended—

6 (1) by designating the first undesignated para7 graph after paragraph (40) as paragraph (41) and 

8 by striking ‘‘The’’ and inserting ‘‘LONG WALK

9 TRAIL.—The’’; and 

10 (2) by designating the second undesignated 

11 paragraph after paragraph (40) as paragraph (42); 

12 and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(43) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRAIL.—The route of the 

16 Mississippi River from its headwaters in the State of Min17 nesota to the Gulf of Mexico.’’. 

18 (b) RELATION TO OTHER STUDIES.—The study re19 quired by the amendment made by this section is intended 

20 to complement, and not duplicate, other studies of the sce21 nic or historical importance of the Mississippi River that 

22 may be underway or undertaken.

Æ
Unemployment rates by county and disaster assistance eligibility,

Alabama, August 2005, not seasonally adjusted

4.0% to 4.9%

3.9% or below

7.0% or more

6.0% to 6.9%

5.0% to 5.9%

Unemployment Rat

(State rate = 4.2%; U.S. rate = 4.9%)

Sumter

Choctaw

Clarke

Washington

Mobile

Baldwin

Hale

Perry

Autauga

Elmore

Marengo

Dallas

Wilcox

Lowndes

Montgomery

Monroe

Conecuh

Butler

Crenshaw

Covington

Escambia

Mobile

Montgomery

Sumter

6.8%

Choctaw

6.0%

Clarke

6.6%

Washington

6.7%

Baldwin

3.2%

Mobile

4.7%

Greene

6.1%

Hale

4.8%

Tuscaloosa

3.5%

Pickens

5.4%

Jefferson

4.3%

Bibb

4.5%

Perry

9.1%

Marengo

5.5%

Wilcox

9.7%

Monroe

5.9%

Marion

4.4%

Winston

4.8%

Lamar

5.0%

Cullman

3.7%

Lauderdale

4.6%

Colbert

4.8%

The labeled counties are eligible for

disaster assistance as of September 10.

NOTE:
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Piedmont Mining Company, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.






Date:  May
      14, 2008By: Robert M. Shields,
      Jr.Name:  Robert
      M. Shields, Jr.Title:  Chief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Piedmont Mining Company, Inc. and will be
retained by Piedmont Mining Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 142 (Monday, July 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37028-37029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17761]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1453-000]


Gateway Energy Services Corporation; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

July 20, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Gateway Energy Services Corporation's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is August 10, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor

[[Page 37029]]

must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC, 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95d3d0c7d6dafbf9fcfbf0c6e0e5e5fae7e1d5f3f0e7f6bbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="61272433222e0f0d080f04321411110e131521070413024f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>. or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17761 Filed 7-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.2

I, Colin Baillie, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-K of South Gyle  Receivables
Trustee Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in this report, taken as a whole, does
not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances  under
which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period
covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge,  the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided  to the trustee by the  servicer  and trust cash  manager  under the
pooling and servicing,  or similar,  agreement,  for inclusion in this report is
included in this report; and

4. Based on my knowledge and a review of the  compliance by the servicer and the
trust cash manager of their obligations under the applicable agreements, each of
the servicer and the trust cash manager has complied with both its servicing and
cash management  obligations and minimum servicing and cash management standards
set forth in the applicable agreements.

Date: March 30, 2006

/s/ Colin Baillie
---------------------------------
Director, Finance, Cards Finance
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, as Servicer and Trust Cash Manager
# 17SNR01_00

# image1.png
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Tim Burroughs, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of TBX Resources, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; andDated this 23rd day of June 2006   /s/ Tim Burroughs Tim Burroughs  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6965
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TRACY DEMONT HUMPHRIES, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-153-G, CA-95-575-2) Submitted: January 13, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tracy Demont Humphries, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed therecord and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Humphries , Nos. CR-91-153-G; CA-95-575-2 (M.D.N.C. June 5, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# 2018

# 2019

# 2020
No. 986.

#### Harbor Marine Contracting Co. et al. *v.*Lowe, Deputy Commissioner, et al.

May 6, 1946.

*Nelson T. Hartson, Howard Boyd*and *George E. Monk*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General Sonnett, Paul A. Sweeney*and *Leon Frechtel*for Lowe, respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# 02

test - continued		

test		

test - continued		

test		

Page &P
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    our periodic report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010
(the Form 10-K), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and
 (b)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and our results of operations.
  By:
    
    /s/ Robert M. Friedland

Robert M. FriedlandChief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    March 16, 2011
Rule 4.2. Political and Campaign Activities of Judicial Candidates in Public
Elections

***

(B) A candidate for elective judicial office may, unless prohibited by law, and not earlier than immediately after the General Election in the year prior to the calendar year in which a person may become a
candidate for such office:

***

(3) publicly endors e or speak on behalf of, or publicly oppose or speak in opposition to, candidates for the same judicial office for which he or she is a judicial candidate, or publicly endorse or speak on behalf of candidates for any other elective judicial office appearin g on the same ballot;

***

Comment:

*** (5) For purposes of paragraph (B)(3), candidates are considered to be a candidate for the same judicial office if they are competing for a single judgeship or for one of several judgeships on the same court to be fi lled as

a result of the election. Additionally, the phrase “candidates for any other elective judicial office appearing on the same ballot” means candidates who appear together on the paper ballot or, in the case of electronic voting terminals, appear tog ether on the electronic ballot

. In endorsing or opposing another candidate for a position on the same court, a judicial candidate must abide by the same rules governing campaign conduct and speech as apply to the candidate’s own campaign.
No. 880.

#### Alker et al. *v.*Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

April 29, 1946.

327 U. S. 799.
*The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to the

applicable rules. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally

disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may

be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 8/9/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

DANNY CAMPBELL, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RON WARD; KLINK, Case Manager,,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-6129

(D.C. No. CIV-95-1886)

(W. District of Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Appellant, Danny Campbell, appeals the district court’s order denying his civil

rights action under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. We have considered the appellant’s pro se brief. 

We affirm for substantially the reasons set forth by the magistrate judge in her report and 
- 2 -

recommendation dated December 22, 1995 and adopted by the district court on March 19,

1996. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony DiSano, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 859]

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 *et seq.).*Defendant was presumptively determined to be a level two risk and, although Supreme Court reduced the points assessed against defendant by eliminating 15 points under the category for history of drug or alcohol abuse, defendant’s score nevertheless remained within the range of a level two risk. Defendant on appeal does not challenge the points assessed for any specific risk factor but instead contends that we should exercise our discretion to afford him a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of special circumstances to justify a downward departure (see *People v Ferrara,*38 AD3d 1302 [2007], *Iv denied*8 NY3d 815 [2007]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Lunn, Green and Gorski, *JJ.*
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-31214 Conference Calendar

MICHAEL ROY RICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MIKE GILLIAM, Warden; FRANCIS J. EVERHEART, Dr.; BONNIE BOBER; J. WILKIE; JOHN DOE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1433-P

- - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appellant appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Appellant contends that his allegations state an Eighth Amendment claim for deprivation of medical care because he alleged that the appellees were aware of his serious medical need but deliberately denied him medical treatment and that appellees forced him to perform a work assignment that he was not able to perform.No. 95-31214 - 2 - Appellant also contends that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his § 1983 action without conducting an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in holding that appellant’s allegations indicated that appellees negligently misdiagnosed appellant’s condition, not that they were deliberately indifferent to appellant’s serious medical needs. See Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Appellant’s allegations do not indicate that appellees were aware that the work assignment would significantly aggravate appellant’s serious medical condition. See Jackson v. Cain , 864 F.2d 1235, 1246 (5th Cir. 1989). Because additional factual development would not enable appellant to state a claim that would pass § 1915(d) muster, the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing appellant’s § 1983 action without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 10 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
[No. 54723-2-I.

Division One.

November 14, 2005.]

#### *In the Matter of the Detention of*Lawrence Williams, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-2-20859-2, Helen Halpert, J., entered July 6, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.