In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 15-1246V 

Filed: May 9, 2017 

UNPUBLISHED 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

STEVEN TOTTEN, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages; 

v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; 

 * Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”);

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Diana Stadelnikas, Maglio, Christopher and Toale, PA (FL), Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. 

Sarah Duncan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On October 26, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

 (the 

“Vaccine Act. Petitioner alleged that he suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) 

casually related to the influenza vaccination he received on November 16, 2012. 

Petition at ¶¶ 1-5; see also Stipulation, filed May 9, 2017, at ¶¶ 1-2, 4. Petitioner further 

alleged that he received the vaccination in the United States, suffered the effects of his 

injury for more than six months, and neither he nor any other party has filed an action or 

received compensation for his injury, alleged as vaccine caused. Petition at ¶¶ 1, 6, 8-

9; see also Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that the influenza immunization is 

the cause of petitioner’s alleged GBS or any other injury or his current condition.” 

Stipulation at ¶ 6. 

 

1

 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2

 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

Nevertheless, on May 9, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, 

stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned 

finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding 

damages, on the terms set forth therein. 

The undersigned awards compensation in the amount of $210,000.00 in the 

form of a check payable solely to petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount 

represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under 

§ 15(a). Id. 

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. 

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of 

the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master 

 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.