alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 
 Schedule A (2) 
 This Schedule A (2) dated March 18, 2013, is issued pursuant to
the Executive Employment Agreement by and between the undersigned, dated October 10, 2011, and shall be incorporated therein and governed by the terms and conditions of such Executive Employment Agreement. This Schedule A (2) is effective
April 1, 2013, and is intended to replace any previously issued Schedule A. 
 1. Position: Chief Executive Officer and President of
Parent and Company. Executive shall report in such capacity to Parent’s Board of Directors. Executive shall also be an executive officer of the Company and report to the Company’s Board of Directors. 

2. Base Salary: $350,000 per year. 
 3.
Bonus: Executive will be entitled to an annual performance-based cash bonus of $180,000, for the achievement of certain financial and operational targets. These targets, and the bonus dollars tied to such targets, will be determined and
communicated to you by the Compensation Committee of Parent’s Board of Directors on an annual basis. For the 2013 calendar year, your bonus will be based on the following performance measures: 

a. Consolidated Revenue; 
 b. Consolidated EPS; and 
 c. Subjective performance. 

The target amount for each measure for the 2013 calendar year is set forth on Appendix 1 to this schedule. Should the Company fail to
achieve the target amount for the above performance measures, Executive’s annual performance-based bonus, if any, shall be based upon the Company’s evaluation of the percentage of the target amount achieved during the year. Conversely,
should the Company’s performance exceed the target amount for the above performance measures, the Executive’s annual performance-based bonus may exceed the bonus amount stated above, based upon the Company’s evaluation of the
percentage of the over-achievement of such target amount(s). All bonuses will be paid by February 15, 2013, following the completion of Company’s year-end audit. If Executive leaves the Company voluntarily, or is terminated with cause,
before December 31, 2013, Executive will not be eligible for a Bonus. If Executive is terminated by the Company during 2013 without cause, Executive’s bonus calculation will be based on the Company’s annual results (calculated as
though Executive were still an employee) and a prorated bonus will be paid considering the days in 2013 in which Executive was employed by Company divided by 365. 
 4. Benefits: Executive is eligible for standard company benefits in the same manner as other executives of the Company and Parent. 
 5. Expenses: The Company will reimburse all properly documented expenses reasonably related to Executive’s performance of Executive’s duties hereunder. 

6. Stock Options: Executive shall be eligible to receive non-qualified stock options pursuant to the Stock Incentive Plan. 

 

									
	BY:	 	 /s/ John J. Cronin, Jr., March 18, 2013
	  		  	BY:	  	 /s/ D. Kevin Horner, March 18, 2013

		 	Company / Date	  		  		  	Executive / Date
July 2, 1999



Securities and Exchange Commission
Branch of Document Control
450 Fifth Street N.W.,
Washington, DC 20549

VIA EDGAR

Subject: Certification under Rule 497(j) - The AAL Mutual Funds
         File No. 33-12911, File No. 811-5075


Dear Ladies and Gentleman:

The  undersigned  hereby  certifies that the form of Prospectus and Statement of
Additional  Information  that would have been filed  pursuant to 497(c) upon the
Post-Effective  Amendment No. 33 to the Registrant's  registration  statement on
Form N1-A would not have differed from that  contained in said amendment to such
registration statement that was filed electronically on June 25, 1999.

Please direct any comments or questions  concerning this certification to Steven
J. Fredricks, Esq. at (920) 734-5721 extension 6864.

Sincerely,

/s/ Steven J. Fredricks

Steven J Fredricks
Attorney III
AAL Capital Management Corporation
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

 

I, David A. Yost, certify that: 

 

1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Raybor Management, Inc.; 

 

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.      The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a)    all significant deficiencies and financialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and 

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Exhibit 10.14






EXHIBIT 10.14




DESCRIPTION OF ARRANGEMENT FOR DIRECTORS FEES




The following sets forth the amount of fees payable to outside directors of S1 Corporation as of
December 31, 2008 for their services as Directors:



	 	 	 	 	 
	EVENT	 	FEE	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer (Board Chairman)
	 	$	150,000	 
	Annual Retainer (excluding Board Chairman)
	 	$	20,000	 
	Board Meeting Attended (In Person)
	 	$	2,000	 
	Board Meeting Attended (By Phone)
	 	$	1,000	 
	Annual Committee Chair Retainer
	 	$	20,000	 
	Committee Meeting Attended (In Person)
	 	$	1,500	 
	Committee Meeting Attended (By Phone)
	 	$	1,000	 
	Annual Yodlee Board Representation Retainer
	 	$	20,000	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	# of Shares	 
	Annual Stock Option Grant (quarterly vesting)
	 	 	16,000	 
	Annual Restricted Stock Grant (quarterly vesting)
	 	 	3,000
Waverly, Inc.
                                1996 Annual Form 10-K
                                     Exhibit 21

                             Subsidiaries of the Company
                             ---------------------------
          Williams & Wilkins Sales, Inc.
          351 West Camden Street
          Baltimore, Maryland 21201            A Maryland Corporation

          Waverly Sales, Inc.
          351 West Camden Street               A United States
          Baltimore, Maryland 21201            Virgin Island Corporation

          Waverly Europe Ltd.
          Broadway House
          2-6 Fulham Broadway
          London SW6 1 AA England              A United Kingdom Corporation

          Urban & Schwarzenberg GmbH
          Landwehrstrabe 61
          D-8000 Munich                        A German Corporation

          Oscar Rothacker
          Verlagsbuchhandlung, GmbH
          Landwehrstrasse 38
          Munich                               A German Corporation

          Urban & Schwarzenberg Verlag
          fur Medizin, GmbH
          Landwehrstrabe 61
          D-8000 Munich                        A German Corporation

          Urban & Schwarzenberg Ges.m.b.H.
          Frankgasse 4,
          Vienna, Austria                      An Austrian Corporation

          Med-Pub, Inc.
          900 Market St.
          Suite 200
          Wilmington, Delaware 19801           A Delaware Corporation

          Urban & Partner
          Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie Str. 55/61
          50-950 Wroclaw, Poland               A Polish Corporation


          Williams & Wilkins Asia-Pacific Ltd.
          Room 808 Metroplaza Tower 2
          223 Hing Fong Road
          New Territories, Hong Kong          A Hong Kong Corporation


          Williams & Wilkins Asia-Pacific Ltd.
          5/12 Wireless Road
          Opp. Hilton Hotel
          Bangkok, 10330, Thailand            A Thailand Corporation
RE:	Saturna Investment Trust, File #33-13247

 

April 1, 2003

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of the referenced Trust and pursuant to Rule 497 (j), we wish tocertify that the form of the recently filed Prospectus and Statement ofAdditional Information for CIK #0000811860, Saturna Investment Trust, that wouldhave been filed under Rule 497 paragraph (b) or (c) would not have differed fromthat contained in the most recent registration or amendment, and that the texthas been filed electronically.

If you have any questions or comments concerning this filing, kindly contactme at  (360) 594-9900 x303.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Occam Networks, Inc. pertaining to the Accelerated Networks,Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-39928, and Form S-8 No. 333-55520), Accelerated Networks, Inc. Option Grant to Mr. Gary J. Sbona (Form S-8 No. 333-72194), Occam Networks, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan(Form S-8 No. 333-91070) and Occam Networks, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-91072 and Form S-8 No. 333-108009) of our report dated February 6, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Occam Networks, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2001 included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Woodland Hills, California 

March 29, 2004
**UNITED STATES**
No. 1097.

#### Knudsen *v.*Stegman.

May 20, 1946.

*Walter H. Maloney*for petitioner.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                        1000
       
<S>                                 <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                9
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                       897
<ALLOWANCES>                        151
<INVENTORY>                        2329
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   3418
<PP&E>                             1389
<DEPRECIATION>                      664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     4426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              9468
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                        (5543)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       4426
<SALES>                            7895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   7895
<CGS>                              6458
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     12423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   1259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (5787)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (5787)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                      (5639)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (2.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (2.33)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered December 13, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00621-CR

No. 05-17-00622-CR

JAIME JOEL RUBIO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-41761-I, F16-41762-I

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 11, 2017 third motion to extend time to file 

appellant’s brief. We DENY appellant’s motion.

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 
–2–

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

These appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
| Delaware                                                 |   | 001-09614                     |   | 51-0291762                             |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
| (State      or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)      |   | (Commission      File Number) |   | (IRS      Employer Identification No.) |
|                                                     |   |                          |   |                                   |
| 390      Interlocken CrescentBroomfield,      Colorado   |   | 80021                         |   |                                   |
| (Address      of Principal Executive Offices)            |   | (Zip      Code)               |   |                                   |
|                                                     |   |                          |   |                                   |
| Registrant's      telephone number, including area code: |   |  (303)      404-1800     |   |                                   |

|                                                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (Former      Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)  |

At the annual meeting of stockholders of Vail Resorts,Inc. (the “Company”), held on December 4, 2009 (the “Meeting”), the Company’sstockholders approved an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Vail Resorts, Inc.Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Share Award Plan (the “Plan”),to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01per share (“Shares”), authorized for issuance thereunder from 5,000,000 Sharesto 7,500,000 Shares.  The Amendment became effective at the Meetingupon stockholder approval thereof.  The material terms of the Plan aresummarized in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, whichwas filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 21,2009.

|                               |   | Vail      Resorts, Inc.                                              |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Date:      December 10, 2009 | By:    |  /s/      Jeffrey W. Jones                                      |
|                               |   | Jeffrey      W. Jones                                                |
|                               |   | Senior      Executive Vice President andChief      Financial Officer |

| Exhibit No. | Description                                                                                                                    |
|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 99.1        | Vail      Resorts, Inc. Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Share      Award Plan, as amended on December 4,2009 |
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department



## 189 **CA 11-00242** PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

KIMBERLY B. ROONEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN E. ROONEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
KAMAN, BERLOVE, MARAFIOTI, JACOBSTEIN & GOLDMAN, LLP, ROCHESTER (RICHARD GLEN CURTIS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Philip B. Dattilo, Jr., R.), entered April 21, 2010 in a divorce action. The order determined the parties’ disputed economic issues.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Rooney v Rooney ([appeal No. 3] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 17, 2012]).

Entered: February 17, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-44430, 333-81504, 333-152810, 333-160938, and 333-163836 on Forms S-8 ofour reports dated June 4, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of OPNET Technologies, Inc. and the effectiveness of OPNET Technologies, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of OPNET Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2010. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

McLean, Virginia 

June 4, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          74,186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,195,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (46,927)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,293,843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,635,424
<PP&E>                                       2,019,710
<DEPRECIATION>                               (689,782)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,630,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,674,796
<BONDS>                                        766,257
<COMMON>                                         3,120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,601,152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,630,923
<SALES>                                      3,457,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,464,010
<CGS>                                        2,523,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,291,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,569
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,828
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (43,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            175,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   175,028
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 2-90847, 33-33620, 333-56904, 333-66698, 333-142132, 333-106852, and 333-150512) on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 12, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Westmoreland Coal Company and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Westmoreland Coal Company, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP  Denver, Colorado March 12, 2010   111
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10 - 13 - 00243 - CR
EX PARTE RAYFORD SMI TH

From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 13
- 001621 - CV
- 85

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Rayford Smith appeals the trial court’s denial of his application for bond reduction. He complains that because the State was not ready to proceed on his Brazos County offenses more than 90 days from the date a detainer was placed on him by Brazos County while Smith was being held on other charges at the Milam County jail,
he should be released on a personal recognizance bond. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 17.151, sec. 1 (West Supp. 2013). Acknowledging that case law from this Court is contrary to his position, see Ex parte Remeika , No. 10

- 09

- 00379

- CR, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 2717, 5

- 6 (Tex. App.

— Waco Apr. 14, 2010, pet. dism’d) (not designated forEx parte Smith Page 2

publication) (holding that the ninety

- day period for determining whether the State was ready for trial on the Walker County charge against defendant did not begin until defendant was transferred from Madison County jail to Walker County jail), Smith argues that we should revisit our holding in Remeika . We decline to do so. Accordingly, based on our decisi on in Remeika , we hold that that the ninety

- day period for determining whether the State was ready for trial on the Brazos County charges against Smith did not begin when the detainer was placed on Smith at the Milam County jail but rather began when Smith was transferred from the Milam County jail to the Brazos County jail. Smith’s sole issue is overruled, and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Affir med Opinion delivered and filed February 20, 2014 Do not publish [CR25]