Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 154 / Friday, August 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 37517 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 

888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. If you 

believe this rule has implications for 

federalism or Indian tribes, please 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 

above. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves a safety 

zone that will prohibit persons and 

vessels from entering, transiting 

through, anchoring in, or remaining 

within a limited area surrounding the 

SC–41 Bridge on the waters of the 

Wando River for two six hour periods. 

This rule is categorically excluded from 

further review under paragraph 34(g) of 

Figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. An environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

and a Record of Environmental 

Consideration are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; and 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T07–0348 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T07–0348 Safety Zone; Demolition of 

SC–41 Bridge, Wando River, Charleston, 

SC. 

(a) Location. All waters of the Wando 

River encompassed within a 500-yard 

radius of SC–41 Bridge, vessels and 

machinery. 

(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated 

representative’’ means Coast Guard 

Patrol Commanders, including Coast 

Guard coxswains, petty officers, and 

other officers operating Coast Guard 

vessels, and Federal, state, and local 

officers designated by or assisting the 

Captain of the Port Charleston in the 

enforcement of the regulated areas. 

(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and 

vessels are prohibited from entering, 

transiting through, anchoring in, or 

remaining within the regulated area 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port Charleston or a designated 

representative. 

(2) Persons and vessels desiring to 

enter, transit through, anchor in, or 

remain within the regulated area may 

contact the Captain of the Port 

Charleston by telephone at (843) 740– 

7050, or a designated representative via 

VHF radio on channel 16, to request 

authorization. If authorization to enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

within the regulated area is granted by 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative, all persons 

and vessels receiving such authorization 

must comply with the instructions of 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative. 

(3) The Coast Guard will provide 

notice of the regulated area by Local 

Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, and on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Enforcement period. This rule will 

be enforced from August 4, 2017 

through August 30, 2017, during 

demolition activity. 

Dated: August 3, 2017. 

G.G. Stump, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Charleston. 

[FR Doc. 2017–16993 Filed 8–10–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2015–0084] 

RIN 1625–AA00, AA11 

Great Lakes—Regulated Navigation 

Areas and Safety Zones 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending 

its Great Lakes Regulated Navigation 

Areas to include one additional 

regulated navigation area in Green Bay, 

WI and safety zones in the Lake Erie 

Islands, OH and Saginaw Bay, MI. These 

zones will apply during the winter 

months and are necessary to protect 

waterway users, vessels, and mariners 

from hazards associated with winter 

conditions and navigation. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
37518 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 154 / Friday, August 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 

DATES: This rule is effective September 

11, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to http://

www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2015– 

0084 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rule. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email LT Matthew Stroebel, Ninth 

District Coast Guard Prevention, U.S. 

Coast Guard; telephone 216–902–6060, 

email matthew.k.stroebel@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

COTP Captain of the Port 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

LCA Lake Carrier’s Association 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 

II. Background Information and 

Regulatory History 

On May 22, 2015, the Coast Guard 

proposed a rule to establish three 

regulated navigation areas (RNA) and 

two safety zones in its Great Lakes area. 

These zones were intended to improve 

the safety of both recreational users and 

commercial shipping in high use areas. 

During the comment period that ended 

July 6, 2015, we received a total of 6 

comments. We received one comment 

from the Lake Carriers’ Association 

stating that it found the rule 

unnecessary and expressed concern that 

the rule will impede vessels’ ability to 

respond quickly and creatively to winter 

conditions. The comment suggested that 

COTP Orders specifically tailored to 

existing and forecasted conditions is a 

better way to respond to hazardous ice 

conditions. We agree that in Maumee 

Bay and the Straits of Mackinac, COTP 

orders can be used instead of an RNA 

since safety issues occur less frequently 

in these areas. Our determination is that 

in Green Bay an RNA is necessary due 

to the high concentration of recreational 

users and expected increased 

commercial vessel traffic in the zone. 

Based on the comments received 

regarding the May 22, 2015 NPRM, we 

amended the proposed rule and issued 

a supplemental notice of proposed 

rulemaking (SNPRM) on April 21, 2017. 

This supplemental notice of proposed 

rulemaking retracts the Coast Guard’s 

proposals to create new regulated 

navigation areas in Maumee Bay and the 

Straits of Mackinac in accordance with 

the feedback received from the Lake 

Carriers Association. We also retracted 

our proposal to re-designate three 

existing regulated navigation areas as 

safety zones. Instead, this rulemaking 

proposed to add two safety zones in the 

Lake Erie Islands and Saginaw Bay to 

protect recreational ice users. We also 

proposed to add one regulated 

navigation area in Green Bay to manage 

increased commercial traffic in an area 

that typically experiences high volumes 

of recreational use. 

We received one comment from the 

Lake Carriers Association (LCA). As a 

result of the LCA’s comment to the 

original NPRM we modified the rule to 

not include zones in Maumee Bay or the 

Straits of Mackinac. LCA commented 

that zones in those locations would be 

detrimental to industry. In response to 

the SNPRM, LCA engaged with their 

member corporations and did not 

receive any feedback opposing the 

addition of a regulated navigation area 

in Green Bay. 

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule 

The Coast Guard is issuing this rule 

under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The 

District Commander has determined 

that there are potential hazards 

associated with commercial shipping 

traffic in close vicinity to recreational 

ice use. These areas attract recreational 

ice users during the winter months. 

Vessel traffic would disrupt ice integrity 

in these areas and pose risks to these 

recreational waterway users, which may 

include people and vehicles falling 

through the ice. To mitigate these risks, 

the Coast Guard is establishing safety 

zones and a regulated navigation area. 

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, 

and the Rule 

As noted above, we received one 

comment on our SNPRM published 

April 21, 2017. This comment was not 

in opposition to the rule. There are no 

changes in the regulatory text of this 

rule from the proposed rule in the 

SNPRM. 

This rule establishes two safety zones, 

one in Saginaw Bay, MI, and the other 

in the Lake Erie Islands, OH. The safety 

zones will be activated when ice 

conditions warrant and will be 

deactivated when the ice dissipates in 

the spring. During the time the safety 

zones are active, vessels will not be 

permitted to transit through the zones 

which will protect recreational ice users 

from the dangers associated with 

icebreaking. 

This rule also establishes a regulated 

navigation area in southern Green Bay, 

WI. This RNA will allow the Coast 

Guard to regulate when commercial 

traffic is permitted in southern Green 

Bay and will give the public a minimum 

of 72 hours notice before a vessel is 

permitted to transit the area. This will 

best manage the risks associated with 

recreational ice users and vessels 

operating in Southern Green Bay. 

V. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

Executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes and 

Executive orders, and we discuss First 

Amendment rights of protestors. 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess the costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the 

importance of quantifying both costs 

and benefits, of reducing costs, of 

harmonizing rules, and of promoting 

flexibility. This rule has not been 

designated a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. 

Accordingly, it has not been reviewed 

by the Office of Management and 

Budget. 

The proposed amendments involve 

closure areas and a vessel management 

area, designed to be implemented only 

during winter months, as ice conditions 

dictate. As to the impact of the closure 

area on Lake Erie near the South 

Channel and the Lake Erie Islands, OH, 

the Coast Guard notes that industry 

vessels have taken alternative routes 

bypassing the Lake Erie Islands when 

recreational ice users are present. The 

Coast Guard anticipates the same 

practice when this area is closed. 

Further, regarding the closure area on 

the waters of Lake Huron in Saginaw 

Bay, Michigan, the Coast Guard 

anticipates closing Saginaw Bay after 

giving due consideration to industry’s 

need to traverse the area. Moreover, 

under certain circumstances, the Coast 

Guard may permit vessel traffic to 

transit the closure areas. Regarding the 

regulated navigation area in Green Bay, 

it is designed to regulate the conditions 

of vessel transit for safety. Overall, we 

expect the economic impact of this 

proposed rule to be minimal and that a 

full Regulatory Evaluation is 

unnecessary. 

B. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 

1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires Federal agencies to consider 

the potential impact of regulations on 

small entities during rulemaking. The 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 154 / Friday, August 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 37519 

term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard received no comments 

from the Small Business Administration 

on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard 

certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 

rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. 

While some owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit the safety 

zone may be small entities, for the 

reasons stated in section V.A. above, 

this rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on any vessel owner 

or operator. 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule. If the rule 

would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 

888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. If you 

believe this rule has implications for 

federalism or Indian tribes, please 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves 

amendments to navigation regulations 

and establishment of a safety zones. It 

is categorically excluded from further 

review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 

2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination and a 

Categorical Exclusion Determination are 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this rule. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Revise § 165.901 to read as follows: 

§ 165.901 Great Lakes—regulated 

navigation areas and safety zones. 

(a) The following are regulated 

navigation areas: 

(1) Lake Huron. (i) The waters of Lake 

Huron known as South Channel 

between Bois Blanc Island and 

Cheboygan, Michigan; bounded by a 

line north from Cheboygan Crib Light 

(LL–1340) at 45°39′48′′ N., 84°27′36′′ W.; 

to Bois Blanc Island at 45°43′42′′ N., 

84°27′36′′ W.; and a line north from the 

mainland at 45°43′00′′ N., 84°35′30′′ W; 

to the western tangent of Bois Blanc 

Island at 45°48′42′′ N., 84°35′30′′ W. 

(ii) The waters of Lake Huron between 

Mackinac Island and St. Ignace, 

Michigan, bounded by a line east from 

position 45°52′12′′ N., 84°43′00′′ W.; to 

Mackinac Island at 45°52′12′′ N., 

84°39′00′′ W.; and a line east from the 

mainland at 45°53′12′′ N., 84°43′30′′ W.; 

to the northern tangent of Mackinac 

Island at 45°53′12′′ N., 84°38′48′′ W. 

(2) Lake Michigan. (i) The waters of 

Lake Michigan known as Gray’s Reef 

Passage bounded by a line from Gray’s 

Reef Light (LL–2006) at 45°46′00′′ N., 

85°09′12′′ W.; to White Shoals Light 

(LL–2003) at 45°50′30′′ N., 85°08′06′′ W.; 

to a point at 45°49′12′′ N., 85°04′48′′ W.; 

then to a point at 45°45′42′′ N., 

85°08′42′′ W.; then to the point of 

beginning. 

(ii) The waters of Lake Michigan 

known as Green Bay from Rock Island 

Passage or Porte Des Morts Passage 

north to Escanaba Light at 45°44′48′′ N., 

087°02′14′′ W.; south to the Fox River 

Entrance at 44°32′22′′ N., 088°00′19′′ W., 

to the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal from 

Sherwood Point Light at 44°53′34′′ N., 

087°26′00′′ W.; to Sturgeon Bay Ship 

Canal Light at 44°47′42′′ N., 087°18′48′′ 

W.; and then to the point of beginning. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
37520 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 154 / Friday, August 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 

(b) Regulations: 

(1) In the RNAs under paragraph (a) 

of this section, the District Commander 

or respective COTP may issue orders to 

control vessel traffic for reasons which 

include but are not limited to: Channel 

obstructions, winter navigation, unusual 

weather conditions, or unusual water 

levels. Prior to issuing these orders, the 

District Commander or respective COTP 

will provide advance notice as 

reasonably practicable under the 

circumstances. The respective COTP 

may close and open these regulated 

navigation areas as ice conditions 

dictate. 

(2) Prior to the closing or opening of 

the regulated navigation areas, the 

COTP will give interested parties, 

including both shipping interests and 

island residents, not less than 72 hours 

notice of the action. This notice will be 

given through Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners, and 

press releases to the media (radio, print 

and television), local COTP will ensure 

widest dissemination. No vessel may 

navigate in a regulated navigation area 

which has been closed by the COTP. 

The general regulations in 33 CFR 

165.13 apply. The District Commander 

or respective COTP retains the 

discretion to authorize vessels to 

operate outside of issued orders. 

(c) The following are safety zones: 

(1) Lake Erie. The area known as the 

Lake Erie Islands which is defined as 

the U.S. waters of Lake Erie at the 

intersection of the International Border 

at 082°55′00′′ W., following the 

International Border eastward to the 

intersection of the International Border 

at 082°35′00′′ W., moving straight south 

to position 41°25′00′′ N., 082°35′00′′ W., 

continuing west to position 41°25′00′′ 

N., 082°55′00′′ W., and ending north at 

the International Border and 082°55′00′′ 

W. 

(2) Lake Huron. The waters of Lake 

Huron known as Saginaw Bay, 

Michigan; bounded by a line from Port 

Austin Reef Light (LL–10275) at 

44°04′55′′ N., 082°58′57′′ W.; to Tawas 

Light (LL–11240) at 44°15′13′′ N., 

083°26′58′′ W.; to Saginaw Bay Range 

Front Light (LL–10550) at 43°38′54′′ N., 

083°51′06′′ W.; then to the point of 

beginning. 

(d) Enforcement: 

(1) The District Commander or 

respective Captain of the Port (COTP) 

will enforce these safety zones as ice 

conditions dictate. Under normal 

seasonal conditions, only one closing 

each winter and one opening each 

spring are anticipated. 

(2) Prior to closing or opening these 

safety zones, the District Commander or 

respective COTP will give the public 

advance notice, not less than 72 hours 

prior to the closure. This notice will be 

given through Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners, and 

press releases to the media (radio, print 

and television), and the local COTP will 

ensure widest dissemination. The 

general regulations in 33 CFR 165.23 

apply. The District Commander or 

respective COTP retains the discretion 

to permit vessels to enter/transit a 

closed safety zone under certain 

circumstances. 

Dated: June 12, 2017. 

J.E. Ryan, 

Commander, RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Ninth 

Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2017–16997 Filed 8–10–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2017–0259] 

Safety Zone; Cleveland National Air 

Show, Cleveland, OH 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of 

regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce 

a safety zone for the Cleveland National 

Air Show, Lake Erie and the Cleveland 

Harbor, Cleveland, OH from 8:00 a.m. 

until 6:00 p.m. each day from August 

31, 2017 through September 4, 2017. 

This action is necessary to provide for 

the safety of life and property on 

navigable waters during this event. 

During the enforcement period, no 

person or vessel may enter the 

respective safety zone without the 

permission of the Captain of the Port 

Buffalo. 

DATES: The regulation in 33 CFR 

165.939(a)(35) will be enforced from 

8:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m., each day 

from August 31, 2017, through 

September 4, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice of 

enforcement, call or email LT Ryan 

Junod, Chief of Waterways Management, 

U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 216–937– 

0124, email ryan.s.junod@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast 

Guard will enforce the Safety Zones; 

Annual Events in the Captain of the Port 

Buffalo Zone listed in 33 CFR 

165.939(a)(35) for the Cleveland 

National Air Show, Cleveland, OH from 

8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day from 

August 31, 2017 through September 4, 

2017. This action is being taken to 

provide for the safety of life and 

property on navigable waters during this 

event. Pursuant to 33 CFR 165.23, entry 

into, transiting, or anchoring within 

these safety zones during an 

enforcement period is prohibited unless 

authorized by the Captain of the Port 

Buffalo or his designated representative. 

Those seeking permission to enter one 

of these safety zones may request 

permission from the Captain of Port 

Buffalo via channel 16, VHF–FM. 

Vessels and persons granted permission 

to enter this safety zone shall obey the 

directions of the Captain of the Port 

Buffalo or his designated representative. 

While within the safety zone, all vessels 

shall operate at the minimum speed 

necessary to maintain a safe course. 

This notice of enforcement is issued 

under authority of 33 CFR 165.939 and 

5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this 

notice in the Federal Register, the Coast 

Guard will provide the maritime 

community with advance notification of 

these enforcement periods via Broadcast 

Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to 

Mariners. If the Captain of the Port 

Buffalo determines that this safety zone 

need not be enforced for the full 

duration stated in this notice; he or she 

may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners 

to grant general permission to enter the 

respective safety zone. 

Dated: August 7, 2017. 

Joseph S. Dufresne, 

Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Buffalo. 

[FR Doc. 2017–16973 Filed 8–10–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 710 

[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0426; FRL–9964–22] 

RIN 2070–AK24 

TSCA Inventory Notification (ActiveInactive) Requirements 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The 2016 amendments to the 

Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 

require EPA to designate chemical 

substances on the TSCA Chemical 

Substance Inventory as either ‘‘active’’ 

or ‘‘inactive’’ in U.S. commerce. To 

accomplish that, EPA is establishing a 

retrospective electronic notification of 

chemical substances on the TSCA 

Inventory that were manufactured 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES