alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.20




SECOND
AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT




SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT (the “Second
Amendment”) made as of this 3rd day of January, 2009, by and between WHX
Corporation, its parents, subsidiaries and affiliates (the “Company” or
“Employer”), and Peter T. Gelfman (“Executive”).




WHEREAS,Executive entered
into a certain Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated April 7, 2008 and
an Amendment to Employment Agreement effective January 1, 2009;




WHEREAS,Employer and
Executive wish to further amend the terms of the Agreement as set forth
below;




NOW, THEREFORE,in
consideration of the promises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained, and in
consideration of Executive’s continued employment, the parties hereto agree as
follows:




1.           Defined
Terms.All
capitalized terms contained in this Second Amendment shall, for the purposes
hereof, have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement unless the
context hereof clearly provides otherwise or unless otherwise defined
herein.




2.           Base
Salary Reduction.  Effective January
4, 2009, Executive’s base salary in effect as of December 31, 2008 shall be
reduced by five percent (5%) (the “2009 5% Base Salary Reduction”).




3.           Executive’s
Acknowledgment and Waiver.Executive acknowledges that
such 2009 5% Base Salary Reduction shall not constitute a Material Diminution
under the Agreement and therefore shall not provide a basis for a Material
Diminution or Relocation Termination Election pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
Agreement. Executive waives all claims against the Company relating to the 2009
5% Base Salary Reduction.




4.           Calculation
of Executive’s Severance Payment.In the event that after
January 4, 2009, Executive becomes eligible for a Severance Payment for any
reason set forth in the Agreement that is unrelated to the 2009 5% Base Salary
Reduction, the Company shall calculate the base salary component of Executive’s
Severance Payment (as set forth in Section 7(a)(i) of the Agreement) on the
basis of the greater of: (i) Executive’s base salary on the date of the
termination of Executive’s employment by the Company, or (ii) Executive’s base
salary as of December 31, 2008.









5.           Miscellaneous
Provisions.




(a)           Except
as modified by this Second Amendment, the Agreement and all its terms and
conditions thereof shall remain in full force and effect.




(b)           The
covenants, agreements, terms and conditions contained in this Second Amendment
shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and, except as may
otherwise be provided in the Agreement, as hereby modified and supplemented,
their respective legal successors and assigns.




(c)           This
Second Amendment may not be changed orally but only by a writing signed by both
parties hereto.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment as of
the date first written above.




WHX
      CORPORATIONBy:
            /s/
      James E. McCabeName:
            James
      F. McCabeTitle:
            SVP/CFO





/s/
      Peter T. GelfmanPeter
      T. Gelfman









2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,599,000
<SECURITIES>                                26,310,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,115,000
<PP&E>                                       7,675,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,540,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,926,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,458,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        76,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,392,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,926,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,959,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,140,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,729,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,729,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,729,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tavares CLAYBORNE, a.k.a. Wug, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-15359

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 11, 2013.

Robert G. Davies, Edwin F. Knight, Pamela C. Marsh, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Edward Brian Lang, E. Brian Lang & Associates, Pensacola, FL, Tavares Clay-borne, FCI Edgefield, Edgefield, SC, for Defendant-Appellant.

*829Before HULL, JORDAN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

E. Brian Lang, on behalf of Tavares Clayborne, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Clayborne’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17933]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than August 12, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. George G. Levin, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; to acquire voting 
shares of Nova Financial Holdings, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of Nova Bank, both of Berwyn, Pennsylvania.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 23, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-17933 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EX-10.21





Exhibit 10.21




SECOND AMENDMENT

TO THE SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT



This amendment (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 30th day of September,
2005 (“Effective Date”) by and between Specialty Risk Solutions, LLC (“SRS”) and Specialty
Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc., and amends the SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) entered
into by the parties on May 11, 2005 as amended. Any terms defined in the Agreement and used herein
shall have the same meaning in this Amendment as in the Agreement. In the event that any provision
of this Amendment and any provision of the Agreement are inconsistent or conflicting, the
inconsistent or conflicting provision of this Amendment shall be and constitute an amendment of the
Agreement and shall control, but only to the extent that such provision is inconsistent or
conflicting with the Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, and in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants set forth, the parties
wish to amend the Agreement as follows:





Subsection (ii) of (c) of Section 1: Sale and Purchase of Securities; Closing, shall
be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




(ii) thereafter, on a quarterly basis beginning October 1, 2005, 3% of the Commissions owed
to Purchaser by the Company on the last day of each quarter, as defined in the Partner Agent
Agreement dated May 11, 2005.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed on their behalf by
their duly authorized officers as of the day, month and year above written.




	 	 	 	 	 
	SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS’ ALLIANCE, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Courtney C. Smith
 

	 	 
	Name:

	 	Courtney C. Smith	 	 
	Title:

	 	President and CEO	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	SPECIALTY RISK SOLUTIONS, LLC	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Scott H. Keller
 

	 	 
	Name:

	 	Scott H. Keller	 	 
	Title:

	 	Managing Director
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 13

Congratulating the Grand Valley State University Lakers for winning the 

2002 NCAA Division II Football National Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. HOEKSTRA (for himself, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. UPTON, 

Mr. CAMP, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. 

MCCOTTER, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. STUPAK, and Ms. KILPATRICK) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Grand Valley State University Lakers 

for winning the 2002 NCAA Division II Football National Championship.

Whereas on December 14, 2002, the Grand Valley State University Lakers won the 2002 NCAA Division II Football 

National Championship by defeating Valdosta State University; 

Whereas this national championship is the school’s first in a 

varsity sport; 

Whereas the Lakers won the 2002 Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (GLIAC) Football Championship with a perfect 9-0 record in league play; 
2

•HRES 13 IH 

Whereas the Lakers completed the 2002 season with a perfect 14-0 record, and won 33 of its last 34 games; 

Whereas Head Coach Brian Kelly has been with the team 

since 1991, and has led the team to a 104-34-2 overall 

record; 

Whereas the Lakers returned 51 letter winners, including 16 

starters from the 2001 team that fell only to North Dakota in the NCAA Division II National Championship 

game; 

Whereas the Lakers placed 18 players on the 2002 AllGLIAC team; 

Whereas quarterback Curt Anes was named the GLIAC Player of the Year for the second straight year and earned 

the 2002 Harlon Hill Trophy as NCAA Division II’s 

most outstanding player; 

Whereas the Lakers defense dominated opponents by ranking 

34th in the Nation in rushing defense and recording 58 

quarterback sacks; 

Whereas the students, alumni, faculty, and fans of Grand 

Valley State University showed their support by helping 

the Lakers set a GLIAC record for regular-season attendance; and 

Whereas the Lakers have displayed great strength, ability, 

and perseverance this season and have made the State of 

Michigan proud: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the Grand Valley State Uni3 versity Lakers for winning the 2002 NCAA Division 

4 II Football National Championship and recognizes 
3

•HRES 13 IH 

1 all the players, coaches, and support staff who were 

2 instrumental in this achievement; 

3 (2) requests that the President recognize the 

4 accomplishments of the 2002 Grand Valley State 

5 University football team and invite them to Wash6 ington, D.C., for a White House ceremony for na7 tional championship teams; and 

8 (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Represent9 atives to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution 

10 to Grand Valley State University for appropriate 

11 display.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 1, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                             152
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,240<F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,653)<F2>
<INVENTORY>                                     41,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,002
<PP&E>                                         209,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (91,466)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,858
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313,599
<SALES>                                         68,349
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,349
<CGS>                                           57,834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (593)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        24
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (617)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (617)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.05)
<FN>
<F1>Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Balance
Sheet or Statement of Operations are reported as $0 herein.

<F2>*Amounts are reported net of reserves in the Consolidated Condensed Balance
Sheets.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 99
                  REPORT ON REVIEW OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Solo Serve Corporation

We have reviewed the interim consolidated financial information included in
Form 10-Q of Solo Serve Corporation (the Company) as of November 2, 1996 and
October 28, 1995 and for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods then ended.
This financial information is the responsibility of the management of the
Company.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical review
procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an
audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated financial information for it to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial information has been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As described in Note 2, on
July 21, 1994, the Company filed a petition for reorganization relief under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.  The Company's Plan of
Reorganization was approved by the creditors and shareholders and confirmed by
the United States Bankruptcy Court on July 6, 1995 and became effective on July
18, 1995.  The Company's recurring operating losses raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.  Management's plans in regard
to future operations are described in Note 2.  The consolidated financial
information does not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome
of this uncertainty.

We previously audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards,
the consolidated balance sheet as of February 3, 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of income, of changes in stockholders' equity and of
cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report
dated March 28, 1996 (which contains an explanatory paragraph with respect to
the substantial doubt of the Company's ability to continue as a going concern)
we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.  In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying balance sheet
information as of February 3, 1996, is fairly stated in all material respects
in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

San Antonio, Texas
December 17, 1996




                                      21
40-17G

 

March 6, 2014

 

VIA EDGAR

  Securities and Exchange Commission  Judiciary Plaza  450 Fifth Street, NW  Washington, DC 20549 

 

RE: Rule 17g-1 Fidelity Bond Reporting

Dear Sir or Madam:  Pursuant to the reporting requirements of Rule 17g-1 of the Investment Company  Act of 1940, as amended, attached with this submission are the following information  with respect to the insured bond naming Saturna Capital Corporation, Saturna  Brokerage Services, Inc., Amana Mutual Funds Trust, and Saturna Investment Trust  as joint insureds:

(a) A copy of Investment Company blanket bond;  (b) A copy of resolution of board of directors;  (c) A document showing amount of single insured bond as relates to joint insured  bond;  (d) The period for which premiums have been paid are from the effective date  of the policy which is December 15, 2013 to December 15, 2014.  (e) A copy of agreement between the investment company and all other named insureds  (“Joint Insured Bond Recovery Agreement”)  If you have any questions or require further information regarding this filing,  please contact the undersigned at (360) 594-9900 Ext. 303.  Very Truly Yours,

*/s/ Ethel B. Bartolome*

Ethel B. Bartolome  Corporate Administrator

 

Attachments
No. 1118.

#### Porter, Price Administrator, *v.*Dicken et al.

April 29, 1946.

*Solicitor General McGrath*for petitioner.

Respondents *pro se.*

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Infinite Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James Witzel, Chief Financial Officer
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
      November 12, 2008





/s/
                James WitzelJames
                WitzelChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 20, 2020

s0513 

# Order

Clerk May 20, 2020

160996

SC: 160996

In re BURGESS

- EILF, Minor. COA: 349352

Bay CC Family Division:

16

- 012159

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 28, 2020

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considere d, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                        [Letterhead of Deloitte & Touche]

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-92076 of Waxman Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report
on TWI International Taiwan, Inc. financial statements dated July 23, 2002
(relating to the financial statements of TWI International Taiwan, Inc. for the
year ended June 30, 202 not presented separately herein), appearing in and
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Waxman
Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2003.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche
(TN Soong & Co and Deloitte & Touche (Taiwan) Established Deloitte & Touche
Effective June 1, 2003)
Taipei, Taiwan
The Republic of China

August 26, 2003
SCWC-14-0000987

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

DAVID T. FLEMING, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. 

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0000987; CRIMINAL NO. 06-1-0570(1))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant David T. Fleming’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on November 6, 2017, is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 21, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-14-0000987

21-DEC-2017

12:07 PM