alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Authentidate Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, being, Surendra Pai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and William A. Marshall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 8, 2007



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Surendra Pai        |  | /s/ William A. Marshall
|Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer

This Certification which accompanies the Form 10-Q is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Authentidate Holding Corp. and will be retained by Authentidate Holding Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 278

Recognizing the contributions Lou Gehrig and his legacy have made in the 

fight against Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2003 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. KING of New York, 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. WAXMAN, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. 

GREENWOOD, Mr. COX, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. SLAUGHTER, 

Mrs. MALONEY, and Mr. TERRY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contributions Lou Gehrig and his legacy 

have made in the fight against Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Whereas Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (hereinafter in this 

resolution referred to as ‘‘ALS’’) is a progressive neuromuscular disease characterized by a degeneration of 

nerve cells of the brain and spinal cord leading to the 

wasting of muscles, paralysis, and eventual death; 

Whereas approximately 30,000 individuals in the United 

States are afflicted with ALS, with approximately 5,000 

new cases each year; 

Whereas the life expectancy of an individual with ALS is 

three to five years from the time of diagnosis; 
2

•HRES 278 IH 

Whereas there is no known cause or cure for ALS; 

Whereas aggressive treatment of the symptoms of ALS can 

extend the lives of individuals with the disease; 

Whereas recent advances in ALS research have produced 

promising leads related to shared disease processes that 

appear to operate in many neurodegenerative diseases; 

Whereas, on June 19, 1903, New York Yankee baseball legend Henry Louis (Lou) Gehrig was born in New York 

City; 

Whereas, on June 19, 2003, The ALS Association will help 

America celebrate what would have been Lou’s 100th 

birthday, honoring his magnificent baseball career and 

his unwavering courage as he faced the deadly disease 

that would carry his name; and 

Whereas The ALS Association Greater New York Chapter 

will celebrate Lou Gehrig’s 100th birthday at Yankee 

Stadium on June 19, 2003, by honoring the life and legacy of Lou Gehrig through a pre-game home plate ceremony, and these activities will help bring greater awareness to the disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Now, 

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes the celebration of Lou Gehrig’s 

3 100th birthday and commends the contributions he 

4 and his legacy have made in the search for better 

5 treatments and a cure for ALS; 

6 (2) acknowledges the struggle of the thousands 

7 of individuals battling ALS everyday and their cour8 age in facing this debilitating disease; 
3

•HRES 278 IH 

1 (3) supports cutting-edge research to find a 

2 cure for ALS; and 

3 (4) applauds the efforts of all organizations, in4 cluding The ALS Association, in their endeavors to 

5 raise awareness about the disease, support research 

6 initiatives, and assist those suffering with ALS and 

7 their families in the challenges of coping with this 

8 terrible affliction.

Æ
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Atherton Construction, LLC ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912DW-04-C-0008 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59505 

Kevin A. Rosenfield, Esq. 

Jackson Rosenfield LLP 

Seattle WA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Francis X. Eugenio, Esq. 

Assistant District Counsel 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Seattle 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE SCOTT 

It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties' Release and Settlement Agreement, that this appeal is sustained. In the nature 

of a consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the lump 

sum amount of $855,000.00 inclusive of interest. No further interest shall be paid. 

Dated: 27 March 2015 

I concur 

~~~-4« Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

aministrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59505, Appeal of Atherton 

Construction, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### Brenda Larivey, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of J.M., an Infant, Respondent, v James Solomon, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[852 NYS2d 885]

Same memorandum as in *Solomon v Larivey*(49 AD3d 1274 [2008]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Smith, Green and Gorski, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
    
  
  
    
    The Company did not maintain adequate controls for the testing, verification and review of
electronic spreadsheets that impact the Companys financial reporting. This resulted in an
ineffective review of the assumptions used and the data input into the electronic spreadsheets
and errors in the Companys asset retirement costs and asset retirement obligations. As a
result, the Companys asset




---



##### 



retirement costs and asset retirement obligations contained errors that were material. These
errors were corrected prior to the issuance of the Companys 2006 consolidated financial
statements. This also resulted in an ineffective review of the assumptions used and the data
input into the electronic spreadsheets used to prepare the companys income tax accrual. As a
result, the Companys accrued state income tax liabilities contained errors that were
material, resulting in the restatement of the Companys 2006 consolidated financial
statements.
 
    
    The Company did not maintain adequate controls to ensure the completeness and accuracy of
the census data used to calculate the Companys postretirement medical benefit liabilities. As
a result, the Companys postretirement medical benefit liabilities contained errors that were
material, resulting in restatement of the Companys 2006, 2005, and 2004 consolidated
financial statements.
 
    
    The Company did not maintain policies, procedures and controls that were adequate to
account for its Performance Unit Plan under generally accepted accounting principles for stock
based compensation.
 KPMG LLP 
 2
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00053

- CR

Rodolfo Alvarez v. The State o f Texas

On a ppeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No. 17

- 01

- 29831

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this c ause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 25, 2019
**Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP**One Indiana Square, Suite 3500  Indianapolis, Indiana 46204Tel: 317.713.3500 /  Fax: 317.713.3699www.taftlaw.com

March 27, 2015

Saturna Investment Trust  c/o Saturna Capital  1300 North State Street  Bellingham, Washington 98225-4730

> 
Re: Amendment to Form N-1A

Gentlemen:

 	In accordance with the registration of an indefinite number of units ("Units") registered by Saturna Investment Trust (the "Trust") for its Funds, we have been asked to provide the opinion of our counsel required to be filed as an exhibit to the Trust's registration statement on Form N-1A (the "Registration Statement"). In rendering this opinion, we have examined such documents, records and questions of law as we deemed it necessary to examine for the purpose of this opinion. Based on that examination and investigation, it is our opinion that the Units will be, upon issuance, validly issued, fully paid and not liable to further assessments.

 We have reviewed Post Effective No. 45, and determined that it does not contain disclosures that would render it ineligible to become effective under Rule 485(b) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.

 We consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to Post Effective Amendment No. 45 to the Registration Statement.

> 
 Sincerely,

TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP*/s/Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP*

2461276
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cecilio Guadalupe BARRIETA-BARRERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-40322

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*341Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cecilio Guadalupe Barrieta-Barrera (Barrieta) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Barrieta has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### LEVY v. PROVIDENCE & STONINGTON S. S. CO.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

April 17, 1903.)

1. New Trial—Inconsistent Verdict—Nominal Damages.

A verdict awarding a passenger the nominal sum of $1 as damages for his expulsion from a boat cannot be sustained where to authorize any recovery the jury must have found that his removal was not justified, or that unnecessary force was used, and he was also subsequently imprisoned for half an hour.

At Law. On motion by plaintiff to set aside the verdict and for a new trial.

Jacob Marks, for the motion.

Henry W. Taft, opposed.

COXE, Circuit Judge.

I can see no way to sustain the verdict, which was for nominal damages only. The view most favorable to the defendant is that the jury found that the conduct of the plaintiff in violating the rules of the boat warranted his removal, but that the defendant’s employés used unnecessary force.

There can be no pretense that the nominal sum of $i is sufficient to compensate the plaintiff for the injury occasioned by this excessive use of force, and for the indignity of the subsequent imprisonment of at least half an hour.

The verdict is inconsistent and illogical. The motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial is granted.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 974

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide capital gain treatment under section 631(b) of such Code for outright sales of timber 

by landowners. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2003

Mr. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

capital gain treatment under section 631(b) of such Code 

for outright sales of timber by landowners.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Timber Tax Simplifica5 tion Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 974 IH 

1 SEC. 2. CAPITAL GAIN TREATMENT UNDER SECTION 631(b) 

2 TO APPLY TO OUTRIGHT SALES BY LAND3 OWNERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 

5 631(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 

6 disposal of timber with a retained economic interest) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘retains an economic interest in such 

8 timber’’ and inserting ‘‘either retains an economic interest 

9 in such timber or makes an outright sale of such timber’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

11 (1) The third sentence of section 631(b) of such 

12 Code is amended by striking ‘‘The date of disposal’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘In the case of disposal of timber with 

14 a retained economic interest, the date of disposal’’. 

15 (2) The heading for section 631(b) of such 

16 Code is amended by striking ‘‘WITH A RETAINED

17 ECONOMIC INTEREST’’. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to sales after the date of the enact20 ment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 4.13


 





 


OPTIONAL CASH INVESTMENT FORM


Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase
Plan


 


To make an optional cash investment under Stock Purchase feature
of the First United Corporation Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, please complete this form and return it, along with
a check in the amount of your optional cash investment, to Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc. in the enclosed envelope.
An optional cash investment may not be less than $50.00 and may not exceed, when aggregated with all other optional cash investments
made during the calendar quarter, $100,000.00. Your check should be made payable to “Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions,
Inc.”


 


These investments must be received at least five (5) days prior
to the Dividend Payment Date, but no earlier than 30 days prior to the Dividend Payment Date.


 


	Name of Shareholder (please print)	 	________________________________	 
	 	 	 	 
	Address of Shareholder	 	________________________________	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	________________________________ 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Amount of Optional Cash Investment:	 	$_______________________________	 


 


	Completed form must be returned to:	 	Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc.	 
	 	 	1717 Arch Street, Suite 1300	 
	 	 	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania19103
H. Res. 107

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 29, 2003.

Whereas the Nation knows the importance of supporting free

market thinking and the entrepreneurial spirit;

Whereas Students in Free Enterprise (SIFE) is the world’s

preeminent collegiate free enterprise organization, and

provides leadership training, regional, national, and international competitions, and career opportunity fairs for

thousands of university and college students;

Whereas SIFE provides university and college students the

best opportunity to make a difference and to develop

leadership, teamwork, and communication skills through

learning, practicing, and teaching the principles of free

enterprise;

Whereas SIFE is a force in promoting international business

awareness, through its operation in more than 33 countries of the world, including former Soviet republics and

China;

Whereas SIFE is active on more than 1,400 university and

college campuses worldwide, involving students and faculties in challenging competitions;

Whereas SIFE promotes the entrepreneurial spirit while reinforcing good business practice;
2

•HRES 107 EH

Whereas SIFE encourages teamwork and education through

participation in learning projects and provides a competitive framework that prepares students for business;

Whereas SIFE gives students a forum to interact with potential employers, as well as providing formal career fairs

and information;

Whereas SIFE depends upon the support and involvement of

members of the faculty, whose advice and commitment

are essential; and

Whereas SIFE benefits from the wider business community,

which appreciates SIFE’s importance in shaping business

thinking in free enterprise: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends

and supports the efforts of Students in Free Enterprise

(SIFE), the world’s preeminent collegiate free enterprise organization.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit 21**

 

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

 

OPNET Analysis, Inc. (formerly MIL 3 Analysis, Inc.), a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. 

 

OPNET Technologies Societe par Actions Simplifiee, a corporation organized under the laws ofFrance. 

 

OPNET Technologies Limited, a corporation organized under the laws ofEngland and Wales. 

 

OPNET Technologies b.v.b.a, (formerly WDM NetDesign,b.v.b.a), a corporation organized under the laws of Belgium. 

 

OPNETTechnologies Pty Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of Australia.
Exhibit 31.4   CERTIFICATION  I, Henry C. Newell, certify that:  1. I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by this Form 10-K/A, of Wausau Paper Corp. (the registrant); and  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.   Date:  October 19, 2012/s/ HENRY C. NEWELLHenry C. NewellPresident and Chief Executive Officer
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 225

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1652) to provide extended unemployment benefits to displaced workers, and to make other improvements 

in the unemployment insurance system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2003

Mr. ISRAEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1652) to provide 

extended unemployment benefits to displaced workers, 

and to make other improvements in the unemployment 

insurance system.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 1652) to provide extended unemployment benefits to dis4 placed workers, and to make other improvements in the 

5 unemployment insurance system. The bill shall be debat6 able for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

7 chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

8 on Ways and Means. The previous question shall be con-
2

•HRES 225 IH 

1 sidered as ordered on the bill to final passage without in2 tervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 

3 without instructions.

Æ
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                      RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Internal Hydro International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Craig
A. Huffman,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    January 30, 2006                     /s/ Craig A. Huffman
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Craig A. Huffman,
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              Internal Hydro International, Inc.
**INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT’S REPORT**

Board of Directorsand StockholdersSlippery Rock Financial Corporation

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Slippery Rock Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of June 30, 2003, and therelated consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, and theconsolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conductedour review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries ofpersons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression ofan opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to theaccompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditingstandards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended (notpresented herein); and in our report dated January 31, 2003 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

|                          |        |
|--------------------------|--------|
| /s/ S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C. |   |
| Wexford, PA              |   |
| August 4, 2003           |   |

27