alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 675

To amend titles XI and XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the 

cap on Medicaid payments for Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, 

the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa and to adjust the 

Medicaid statutory matching rate for those territories. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2003

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN (for herself, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́, 

and Ms. BORDALLO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend titles XI and XIX of the Social Security Act 

to remove the cap on Medicaid payments for Puerto 

Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Northern Mariana 

Islands, and American Samoa and to adjust the Medicaid 

statutory matching rate for those territories.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 675 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF THE CAP ON MEDICAID PAY2 MENTS FOR PUERTO RICO, THE VIRGIN IS3 LANDS, GUAM, THE NORTHERN MARIANA IS4 LANDS, AND AMERICAN SAMOA AND ADJUST5 MENT OF THE MEDICAID STATUTORY MATCH6 ING RATE FOR THOSE TERRITORIES. 

7 (a) REMOVAL OF CAP.—

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1108 of the Social 

9 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1308) is amended by strik10 ing subsections (f) and (g). 

11 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(A) Section 

12 1902(j) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(j)) is amend13 ed by striking ‘‘the limitation in section 1108(f),’’. 

14 (B) Section 1905(u) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

15 1396d(u)) is amended by striking paragraph (4). 

16 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF FEDERAL MEDICAL ASSIST17 ANCE PERCENTAGE (FMAP).—Section 1905(b)(2) of 

18 such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)(2)) is amended by striking 

19 ‘‘50 per centum’’ and inserting ‘‘for purposes of this title 

20 only 77 percent’’. 

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

22 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

23 of this Act, and shall apply to expenditures made on or 

24 after such date.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick Fulton, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[853 NYS2d 518]

Present—Martoche, J.P., Smith, Peradotto, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Justin James RODRIGUEZ, also known as Justin James Lee Rodriguez, also known as Justin James Hunter, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-3072.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 11, 2013.

Filed: April 5, 2013.

Jeffrey Marc Bryan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

Katherine M. Menendez, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Justin James Rodriguez, Inez, KY, pro se.

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Justin James Rodriguez pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The district court1 sentenced Rodriguez to 108 months of imprisonment. Rodriguez appeals, contending the district court’s sentence is substantively unreasonable. We affirm.

*620Rodriguez was charged with unlawfully possessing a firearm after police discovered a photo on his cellular phone of Rodriguez posing with a gun in his cousin’s apartment. At sentencing, the district court stated it intended to vary downward from the 120-month statutory maximum due to the lack of immediate danger posed to the public by Rodriguez’s possession of the gun, as well as his challenging upbringing, which included difficult family circumstances and an addiction to alcohol he developed at an early age. At the same time, the court noted the extent of the variance was limited by Rodriguez’s lengthy criminal history, which the court found “as extensive as can be given someone [Rodriguez’s] age.” Sent. Tr. 14.

We review “the substantive reasonableness of the sentence imposed under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). An abuse of discretion occurs when the district court “fails to consider a relevant factor that should have received significant weight, gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or considers only the appropriate factors but commits a clear error of judgment in weighing those factors.” *United States v. Moore,*565 F.3d 435, 438 (8th Cir.2009) (quotation and citation omitted).

The district court stated its reasons for the sentence handed down after considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. A sentencing court has “wide latitude to weigh the § 3553(a) factors in each case and assign some factors greater weight than others in determining an appropriate sentence.” *United States v. Bridges, 569*F.3d 374, 379 (8th Cir.2009). In this case, the district court’s decision to balance the mitigating factors of Rodriguez’s upbringing and the nature of the offense against the aggravating factor of Rodriguez’s criminal history is well within the considerable discretion of the district court. We can find no basis for concluding Rodriguez’s sentence was substantively unreasonable.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
H. Res. 159

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 2, 2003.

Whereas Irma Rangel, in 1977, became the first MexicanAmerican woman ever elected to the Texas House of Representatives;

Whereas Irma Rangel served the great State of Texas and

the people of Kingsville with honor and distinction for 26

years as a Member of the Texas House of Representatives;

Whereas Irma Rangel was Chairwoman of the Texas House

of Representatives Committee on Higher Education and

was a tireless advocate of educational opportunities for

all students;

Whereas Irma Rangel recognized the value of higher education for all young people of Texas and introduced the

10 percent rule legislation that entitled all highly motivated and successful Texas high school students who

graduated in the top 10 percent of their high school class

to be admitted into Texas institutions of higher education, marking a shift in college admissions;

Whereas Irma Rangel recognized the importance of creating

a professional school of pharmacy in South Texas and

worked diligently to realize that vision;
2

•HRES 159 EH

Whereas Irma Rangel was a staunch supporter of Texas

Grant 1 and Texas Grant 2, which provided tuition and

fees for students who graduated under the recommended

plan and extended those opportunities to community college students;

Whereas Irma Rangel dedicated her life to make Texas better

for all its citizenry, improve the quality of life for the

people she served, and especially expand educational opportunities for the young people of Texas;

Whereas the life and legacy of Irma Rangel serve as an inspiration for the young people of Texas and for the poor

and powerless for whom she fought so passionately;

Whereas Irma Rangel was a role model for young Hispanic

female students in achieving success;

Whereas Irma Rangel placed high value on self-empowerment, which enabled individuals to access opportunities to

achieve their goals; and

Whereas Irma Rangel will forever be remembered for her signature phrase, ‘‘Will this hurt or help?’’ when addressing

pending legislation before the Texas House of Representatives: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) has learned with profound sorrow of the death

of Irma Rangel on March 18, 2003, and extends condolences to her family;

(2) expresses its deep gratitude to Irma Rangel and

her family for the service that she rendered to the State

of Texas;
3

•HRES 159 EH

(3) recognizes with appreciation and respect Irma

Rangel’s exemplary commitment to public service and

her constituents; and

(4) esteems Irma Rangel as a role model for generations to come in South Texas and the entire Nation.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Catalyst Resource Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Henry Fahman, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 31, 2011

/s/ Henry Fahman         

Henry Fahman

Interim Chief Executive/Financial Officer

 

 

----
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 131

Expressing the gratitude of the House of Representatives to the people and 

Government of Malaysia for their support, cooperation, and assistance 

in combating international terrorism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2003

Mr. MEEKS of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the gratitude of the House of Representatives 

to the people and Government of Malaysia for their 

support, cooperation, and assistance in combating international terrorism.

Whereas the United States and Malaysia have a long history 

of fraternal relations between both countries; 

Whereas rubber from Malaysia has played an important role 

in the development of the automobile industry in the 

United States; 

Whereas the Malaysian armed forces served alongside United 

States Armed Forces in Somalia; 

Whereas United States Armed Forces train in the art of jungle warfare combat at Malaysia’s Jungle Warfare Center; 
2

•HRES 131 IH 

Whereas on May 14, 2002, Prime Minister Mahathir of Malaysia paid an official visit the United States to meet 

with President George W. Bush; 

Whereas the United States and Malaysia have agreed to cooperate in the area of seaport security; and 

Whereas Malaysia has agreed to partner with the United 

States and host the creation of a Regional Counter-Terrorism Center focusing on training and capacity building: 

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ex2 presses its friendship with the citizens of Malaysia and 

3 its deep appreciation and gratitude to the Government of 

4 Malaysia for their support, cooperation, and assistance in 

5 combating international terrorism.

Æ
# imports

https://www.bls.gov/mxp/data/home.htm
#### NOROTOS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OPS-CORE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2013-1042.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 9, 2013.

Edward R. Schwartz, Christie, Parker & Hale LLP, of Glendale, CA, argued for *981plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Thomas J. Daly.

Thomas B. Kenworthy, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, of Philadelphia, PA, argued for defendant-appellee.

PROST, REYNA, and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Live Current Media
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, C. Geoffrey Hampson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer of the Company and Chairman of the Board of Directors, certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




/s/ C. Geoffrey
Hampson




C.
Geoffrey Hampson


Chief
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Chairman


October
26, 2009




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
statement.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 812

To guarantee the right of individuals to receive Social Security benefits 

under title II of the Social Security Act in full with an accurate annual 

cost-of-living adjustment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. JONES of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To guarantee the right of individuals to receive Social Security benefits under title II of the Social Security Act 

in full with an accurate annual cost-of-living adjustment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Guar5 antee Act of 2003’’ . 
2

•HR 812 IH 

1 SEC. 2. GUARANTEE OF FULL SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS 

2 WITH ACCURATE ANNUAL COST-OF-LIVING 

3 ADJUSTMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—On a date not later than 90 days 

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

6 of the Treasury shall issue a benefit guarantee certificate 

7 to each individual who is determined by the Commissioner 

8 of Social Security as of such date to be entitled to benefits 

9 under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 

10 et seq.). The Secretary shall also issue such a certificate 

11 to any individual on the date such individual is determined 

12 thereafter to be entitled to benefits under such title. 

13 (b) Benefit Guarantee Certificate.—The benefit 

14 guarantee certificate issued pursuant to subsection (a) 

15 shall represent a legally enforceable guarantee—

16 (1) of the monthly amount of benefits to which 

17 the individual is entitled under title II of the Social 

18 Security Act (as in effect on the date of the issuance 

19 of the certificate); and 

20 (2) that the benefits will be adjusted—

21 (A) not less frequently than annually on 

22 the basis of an accurate determination of the 

23 increase in the cost-of-living of the individual; 

24 and 
3

•HR 812 IH 

1 (B) in accordance with such title (as so in 

2 effect), to reflect any future changes in the eli3 gibility status of the individual under such title. 

4 (c) ENTITLEMENT.—Any certificate issued under the 

5 authority of this section constitutes budget authority in 

6 advance of appropriations Acts and represents the obliga7 tion of the Federal Government to provide for the payment 

8 to the individual to whom the certificate is issued benefits 

9 under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 

10 et seq.) in the amounts set forth in the certificate and 

11 adjusted thereafter as described in subsection (b)(2).

Æ
H. Res. 189

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 10, 2003.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 6) to enhance energy conservation and research

and development, to provide for security and diversity in the

energy supply for the American people, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

All points of order against consideration of the bill are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour and 30 minutes, with 30 minutes equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 20

minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of each of the Committees on

Science, Resources, and Ways and Means. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the

five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. No
2

•HRES 189 EH

amendment shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution.

Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed in

the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in

the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for

the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled

by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the

Whole. All points of order against such amendments are

waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted.

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the

bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without

instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 

 

May 2, 2018 

Order 

 

Clerk 

May 2, 2018 

157221(56) 

STATE TREASURER, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 157221 

v COA: 336202 

 Emmet CC: 16-105277-CZ 

MICHAEL A. KENNEDY, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and OFFICE OF 

RETIREMENT SERVICES, 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted for filing if submitted on or 

before May 23, 2018.
Ex 10.39 Blazer Amendment 4


Exhibit 10.39


FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Fourth Amendment”), is made as of May 15, 2012, by and between Apex Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) and Rand Blazer (the “Employee”).  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement (as defined below).


RECITALS


		
	A.
	The Company and the Employee entered into an employment agreement, dated January 8, 2007, as amended on December 31, 2008, as further amended on August 3, 2009, and as further amended on May 15, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”).




		
	B.
	After May 15, 2012, the Company established “Apex Systems, Inc. Senior Management PTO Plan” (“PTO Plan”).  The Employment Agreement is hereby amended to clarify Employee’s participation in the PTO Plan.




AMENDMENT


		
	1.
	Section 5.  Section 5 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the PTO Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference.




		
	2.
	This Fourth Amendment is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Employment Agreement.




		
	3.
	Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fourth Amendment as of the date first written above.
 APEX SYSTEMS, INC.




By: /s/ Buddy Carl Omohundro
Buddy Carl Omohundro
General Counsel
                        


EMPLOYEE


/s/ Rand Blazer                            
Rand Blazer
















 LA\2543293.6
20039728v1
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 82

To increase the numerical limitation on the number of asylees whose status 

may be adjusted to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To increase the numerical limitation on the number of 

asylees whose status may be adjusted to that of an 

alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Increase in Numerical 

5 Limitation for Asylees Adjustment Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN NUMERICAL LIMITATION ON ASYLEE 

7 ADJUSTMENT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 209(b) of the Immigra9 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1159(b)) is amended 

10 by striking ‘‘10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘25,000’’. 
2

•HR 82 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to fiscal years beginning with 

3 fiscal year 2003.

Æ
Exhibit
32






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the Annual Report of Live Current Media Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Geoffrey
Hampson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company
and Chairman of the Board of Directors, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.






/s/
C. Geoffrey Hampson


C.
Geoffrey Hampson


Chief
Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, and Chairman


March 30,
2009




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
statement.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

Supreme Court No. DA 23-0200 

MATTHEW “MATT” OLDS, 

 Plaintiff /Appellee/Cross-Appellant, 

v. 

MARK HUELSKAMP, 

 

Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee. 

ORDER 

On Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County 

Cause No. DV-19-1036 

The Honorable Jason Marks, Presiding 

______________________________________ 

Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee Mark Huelskamp (“Huelskamp”) has 

moved, unopposed, for a 30-day extension of time, up to and including November 17, 

2023, to file his Reply Brief and Response to Cross-Appeal Brief (“Reply/Response 

Brief”), which is currently set for October 20, 2023. Good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED that Huelskamp’s motion is granted, and he may have up to 

and including November 17, 2023 in which to file his Reply/Response Brief. 

Dated: _____________ 

 ________________________________ 

 Clerk of the Supreme Court 

cc: Scott M. Stearns/Zach A. Franz

 Carey B. Schmidt/David C. Berkoff 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 5 2023

10/05/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0200