alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17983]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. TS09-9-000;EL99-4-001]


City of Santa Clara, CA; Notice of Filing

July 21, 2009.
    Take notice that on July 13, 2009, The City of Santa Clara, 
California, doing business as Silicon Valley Power (SVP) filed a 
request for continued waiver of the Commission's standards of conduct 
requirements, pursuant to the Commission's May 21, 2009 Order, Material 
Changes in Facts Underlying Waiver of Order No. 889 and Part 358 of the 
Commission's Regulations, 127 FERC 61,141 (2009) and consistent with 
the waiver granted previously to SVP by the Commission on January 19, 
1999 in Docket No. EL99-4-000, M-S-R Public Power Agency, et al., 86 
FERC 61,031 (1999).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#db9d9e899894b5b7b2b5be88aeababb4a9af9bbdbea9b8f5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86c0c3d4c5c9e8eaefe8e3d5f3f6f6e9f4f2c6e0e3f4e5a8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 19, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17983 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Advance copies of this statement are made available to the 

press under lock-up conditions with the explicit 

understanding that the data are embargoed until 8:30 a.m. 

Eastern Daylight Time.

Statement of

Kathleen P. Utgoff

Commissioner

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Friday, June 2, 2006

 Nonfarm payroll employment edged up by 75,000 in May, 

and the unemployment rate, at 4.6 percent, was essentially 

unchanged. From January through April of this year, 

payroll employment growth averaged 164,000 per month. 

 Within the service-providing sector, health care 

employment continued to expand, rising by 19,000 in May. 

Within professional and business services, employment 

increased in computer systems design. Wholesale trade 

added 14,000 jobs in May; employment in this industry has 

grown by 108,000 in the past year. Over the month, 

employment continued to trend up in financial activities.

 Retail trade employment fell by 27,000 in May, 

following an even larger decline in April. Over the year,

however, retail trade employment has changed little, on 

net. The information industry shed 13,000 jobs in May; 
2

losses were concentrated in motion picture and sound 

recording industries. Employment in leisure and 

hospitality was little changed over the month.

 In the goods-producing sector, manufacturing 

employment edged down by 14,000, largely offsetting an 

increase in April. Over the month, manufacturing hours 

declined by 0.1 hour, and factory overtime was unchanged.

 In May, construction employment was flat across all 

component industries--residential and nonresidential 

building, heavy construction, and specialty trade 

contractors. Following substantial gains in January and 

February, the number of jobs in construction has not

changed significantly in the past 3 months. 

 Elsewhere in the goods-producing sector, job growth in 

support activities related to oil and gas operations 

continued to keep mining employment on an upward trend.

 Average hourly earnings for private sector production 

and nonsupervisory workers edged up by 1 cent over the 

month, following a 10-cent increase in April. Over the 

year, average hourly earnings have risen by 3.7 percent.

 In May, the unemployment rate was 4.6 percent, down 

from 5.1 percent a year earlier. Over the month, the 

civilian labor force participation rate held at 66.1 
3

percent. Since April 2005, the participation rate has

shown little change, ranging from 66.0 to 66.2 percent. 

 In summary, nonfarm payroll employment edged up by 

75,000 in May, and the unemployment rate was essentially 

unchanged at 4.6 percent.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Del Webb Corporation:

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements (Nos.
33-12023, 2-78336, 33-32309,  33-10228,  33-46720,  33-46704, 33-6564, 33-52725,
33-65161,  33-65163,  333-72733 and 333-72735 on Forms S-8 and No.  333-81507 on
Form S-3) of Del Webb Corporation of our report dated August 16, 1999,  relating
to the  consolidated  balance sheets of Del Webb Corporation and subsidiaries as
of June 30, 1999 and 1998 and the related  consolidated  statements of earnings,
shareholders'  equity and cash flows and related  schedule for each of the years
in the three-year  period ended June 30, 1999 which appears in the June 30, 1999
annual report on Form 10-K of Del Webb Corporation.


Phoenix, Arizona                        /s/ KPMG LLP
September 16, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 824 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 824

  To authorize the National Science Foundation to carry out research 
projects to develop and assess novel uses of high-performance computer 
 networks for use in science, mathematics, and technology education in 
                   elementary and secondary schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2003

  Mr. Larson of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
                  referred to the Committee on Science

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the National Science Foundation to carry out research 
projects to develop and assess novel uses of high-performance computer 
 networks for use in science, mathematics, and technology education in 
                   elementary and secondary schools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Research on High-Performance 
Networking for Science Education Act''.

SEC. 2. NETWORKING RESEARCH PROJECTS.

    (a) Projects Authorized.--As part of the Networking and Information 
Technology Research and Development Program authorized under section 
101(a) of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (15 U.S.C. 
5511(a)), the National Science Foundation, in cooperation with other 
agencies participating in that Program, is authorized to carry out 
research projects to develop novel uses and to evaluate the 
effectiveness of high-performance computer networks in science, 
mathematics, and technology education in elementary and secondary 
schools.
    (b) Assessments.--The National Science Foundation shall identify 
metrics to assess the educational effectiveness of the projects under 
subsection (a), put in place procedures to make such an assessment for 
each project supported, and document and disseminate the findings of 
the assessments. Descriptions of the projects and the findings of the 
assessments of projects shall be included in the report required under 
section 101(a)(3)(A) of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (15 
U.S.C. 5511(a)(3)(A)).

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

     There are authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of this 
Act $10,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006.
                                 <all>
```
cmfo_ex1031.htm


Exhibit 10.31







Amendment to Employment Agreement







This Amendment Agreement to the employment agreement is entered into as of October 17, 2012 by and between China Marine Food Group Limited (the “Company”), a Nevada corporation with business address at Dabao Industrial Zone, Shishi City, Fujian Province, China 362700, and Mr. Weipeng Liu (the “Executive”).







WHEREAS, the parties entered into an employment agreement on November 17, 2007, which agreement was renewed on January 1, 2011.







WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the employment agreement.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the Parties,


 


1.            Remuneration













Section 2 b is deleted and replaced in its entirety as follows:







b. Bonus.      The Executive shall have an opportunity to receive an annual bonus during the term of employment, subject to such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee shall prescribe; it being understood that the actual annual bonus received by the Executive will depend on the level of attainment of performance by the Executive and the Company and other factors used by the Company to determine annual bonus amounts and that there is no guarantee that an annual bonus will be earned.







     2.           No Other Changes







Except as stated in this amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the employment agreement as renewed on January 1, 2011 shall remain in full force and effect as set forth therein.  Henceforth, any reference to the employment agreement shall be deemed to refer to the employment agreement, as amended by this amendment.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year above written.












CHINA MARINE FOOD GROUP LIMITED












/s/ Marco Hon Wai Ku ________________________________


By:  Marco Hon Wai Ku

















/s/ Weipeng Liu______________________________________


Weipeng Liu
**As Amended on May 1, 2014**

**EXHIBIT A**

**to the**

**Administrative Services Agreement**

** **

** **

 

1 Fund offers Class 3 shares

2 Funds offer Class P1 and P2 shares only. Do not offerClass 1, 2, 3, or 4 shares.

 

 

**As Amended on May 1, 2014**

**EXHIBIT A**

**to the**

**Insurance Administrative Services Plan**

** **

** **
Amendment 2012-1 to Senior Management Agreement



 Exhibit 10.13 
 AMENDMENT 2012-1 
 TO 

SENIOR MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT 2012-1 (the “Amendment”), dated as of December 14, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), is entered into by and between Antares Pharma, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), and Robert F. Apple (“Executive”). 
 RECITALS 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive previously entered into a Senior Management Agreement, dated February 9, 2006, as amended
November 12, 2008 (the “Existing Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the
Existing Agreement to clarify that the actual annual bonus paid to Executive may be greater than Executive’s target annual bonus; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 11.15 of the Existing Agreement provides that the Existing Agreement may be amended pursuant to a written agreement executed by both parties. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Executive hereby agree that, effective as of the Effective Date, the Existing Agreement shall be amended
as follows: 
 1. Section 2.2 of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 “2.2. Bonuses. In addition to the Executive’s Base Salary, the Executive shall be eligible to
receive a bonus for each calendar year during the Employment Period, based on attainment of certain individual and corporate performance goals and targets (the “Annual Bonus”). The target amount of the Executive’s Annual Bonus shall
be 40% of Base Salary; provided, however, that a reduction in the Executive’s target annual bonus of 40% of the Executive’s Base Salary for any calendar year during the Employment Period shall constitute a failure by the Company to
materially comply with the terms of this Agreement. The performance goals and targets shall be determined by the Compensation Committee in consultation with the CEO. Once determined, the applicable performance goals and targets shall be communicated
to the Executive as soon as reasonably practicable following the Compensation Committee’s determination of the applicable goals and targets. The actual Annual Bonus amount paid will be based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination,
in its sole discretion, whether and to what extent the applicable performance goals and targets have been achieved, and such amount may be more or less than the target amount, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. Any
Annual Bonus earned and payable to the Executive hereunder shall be paid on or after January 1 but not later than March 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year for which the Annual Bonus is earned.” 

2. In all respects not amended, the Existing Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed. 

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive agree to the terms of the foregoing Amendment,
effective as of the Effective Date. 
  

			
	ANTARES PHARMA, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Paul K. Wotton
	Name:	 	Dr. Paul K. Wotton
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	
	 EXECUTIVE

	
	/s/ Robert F. Apple
	 Robert F. Apple




  
 2
## NO. 12

- 15

- 00110

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DORIS NELL FONTENOT,

APPELLANT

V.

JIMMIE BYRON FONTENO T,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PE R CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was signed on April 14, 2015,

and Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. On April 20, 2015, Appellant timely filed a

notice of appeal in the trial court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1. The notice of appeal failed to

contain the information required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a

certificate of service showin g service on all parties to the trial court's judgment.

On April 27, 2015, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rules 9.5 and 25.1(e). She

was further notified that unless she filed an amended notice of appeal on or before May 27, 2015,

the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). The

deadline for filing an amended notice of appeal has passed, and Appellant has not corrected her

defective notice of appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg , No. 12

- 04

-

00004

- CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.

– Tyler F eb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v.

Hubert , No. 12

- 03

- 00442

- CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.

– Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet.

denied).2

Opinion delivered June 3, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 3 , 2015

NO. 12

- 15

- 00110

- CV

DORIS NELL FONTENOT,

Appellant

V.

JIMMIE BYRON FONTENO T,

Appellee

Appeal from the Co unty Court at Law

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 14

- 1726

- E)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed ; and that this decision be certified to the court

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
BLANK 

Ph o 11.e: f 6 fJ 9) 7 5 fJ- 7 7 () 7 

Fax: (6f/9) 897-7395 

Enittil: K or11(1i /Jla11kRome. com 

VIA ECF 

Honorable Peter G. Sheridan 

United States District Court, District of New Jersey 

Clarkson S. Fisher Building & Courthouse 

402 East State Street 

Trenton, New Jersey 08608 

ROMELLP 

COUNSELORS AT LAW 

February 9, 2016 

RECEIVED 

FE8 o 9 2ms 

AT 8:30 M 

WILLIAM T. WALSH CLE~K 

Re: Sivolella v. AXA Equitable Life Ins. Co., No. 11-04194 (D.N.J.) 

Sanford v. AXA Equitable Funds Mgmt. Grp .• LLC, No. 13-00312 (D.N.J.) 

Dear Judge Sheridan: 

XA Equitable Life Insurance Company and AXA Equitable . 

Funds Management Group, LLC (' fondants"), in the above matters. Defendants hereby 

withdraw their January 19, 2016 Notice o Appeal of Magistrate Judge's Order Precluding Certain 

of Defendants' Trial Exhibits. 

ank you for Your onor's courtesies and consideration. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Isl Jonathan M Korn 

Jonathan M. Korn 

JMK/jln 

cc: All Counsel of Record (via ECF) 

SO ORDERED: f~ A~ [',A,TFO: ~ "V'l 't I ( b 

301 Carnegie Center, 3'1 Floor, Princeton, NJ 08540 

A Pennsylvania LLP Stephen M Orlofsky, New Jersey Administrative Padner 

www.BlankRome.com 

Boca Raton • Cincinnati • Fort Lauderdale • Houston • Los Angeles • New York • Philadelphia • Pittsburgh • Princeton • San Francisco • Shanghai • Tampa • Washington • Wilmington 

137574.00601110 I 958344v. I 

Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS-DEA Document 228 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 14785
# **EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

 

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

## **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Douglas B. Mackie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Douglas B. Mackie

Chief Executive Officer

November 12, 2002

 

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 25, 2012 

t0522 

Order 

 

May 25, 2012 

144466-7 

RAYMOND WAYNE TACKETT, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144466 

 COA: 296805 

Wayne CC: 08-106659-CD 

GROUP FIVE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

THOMAS M. MCGREGOR, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144467 

 COA: 296819 

Wayne CC: 08-105824-CD 

GROUP FIVE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 2, 2017

t0530 

# Order

Clerk June 2, 2017

155047

PNC BANK,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 155047

COA: 333441

Macomb CC: 2014

- 004005

- CH

ERCOLE DiSTEFANO, JOANNE DiSTEFANO,

NORTH CRE VENTURE 2010

- 2, LLC, and

FCI LENDER SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants,

and

SELECT COMMERCIAL ASSETS, LLC,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 23, 2016

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN

, C.J. ( concurring ).

I concur in the Court’s order of denial. Plaintiff here relies heavily on Cordes v

Great Lakes Excavating & Equip Rental, Inc , unpublished per curiam opinion of the

Court of Appeals, decided June 7, 2012 (Docket No. 304003), in which that Court held

that a mortgagor’s affidavit stating that an earlier mortgage on the property had been

improperly discharged placed a subsequent purchaser on notice of the first mortgagee’s

interest and the subsequent mortgagee’s interest was thus subordinate. Without

determining whether Cordes was rightly decided, I write separately only to note that

Cordes is clearly distinguishable from the instant case. In Cordes , the affidavit of

erroneous discharge was recorded before the execution and recording of the second

mortgage. Here, the affidavit of erroneous discharge was recorded after the second

mortgage had been executed and recorded. Only the assignment of the second mortgage

occurred after the affidavit of erroneous discha rge had been recorded. Thus, whether

unpublished or published, Cordes is distinguishable and does not, in my judgment,

support plaintiff’s claim.
Exhibit 23.1






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-
34566) pertaining to the EnviroSource, Inc. Savings Plan,
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-26633), Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-
1549), and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-13728), each of which pertains to
EnviroSource, Inc.'s Incentive Stock Option Plan, Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-46925) pertaining to the Envirosafe
Services, Inc. Stock Option Plan, and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-53019) pertaining to the EnviroSource, Inc. 1993
Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 19, 1996 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
EnviroSource, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1995.



                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Stamford, Connecticut
March 15, 1996