alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 987 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 987

    To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to ensure congressional 
  involvement in the process by which a river that is designated as a 
wild, scenic, or recreational river by an act of the legislature of the 
 State or States through which the river flows may be included in the 
    National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2003

  Mr. Herger (for himself and Mr. Doolittle) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to ensure congressional 
  involvement in the process by which a river that is designated as a 
wild, scenic, or recreational river by an act of the legislature of the 
 State or States through which the river flows may be included in the 
    National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Wild and Scenic Rivers 
Congressional Involvement Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. PROCESS FOR INCLUSION OF STATE DESIGNATED WILD, SCENIC, AND 
              RECREATIONAL RIVERS IN NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS 
              SYSTEM.

    (a) Congressional Role.--Section 2(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers 
Act (16 U.S.C. 1273(a)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii) of the first sentence, by striking 
        ``that are found by the Secretary of the Interior'' and all 
        that follows through ``Virginia State line.'' and inserting 
        ``and that are authorized for inclusion in the national wild 
        and scenic rivers system by an Act of Congress following the 
        submission of an application to the Secretary of the Interior 
        by the Governor of the State or the Governors of the States 
        concerned, or a person or persons duly appointed by such 
        Governor or Governors.'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ``and submit to 
        Congress a report regarding whether each State designated river 
        specified in the application meets the criteria for inclusion 
        in the national wild and scenic rivers system'' after 
        ``Register''; and
            (3) in the third sentence, by striking ``designated under 
        clause (ii)'' and inserting ``authorized for inclusion in the 
        national wild and scenic rivers system by an Act of Congress 
        under clause (ii)''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Such section is amended in the fourth 
sentence by striking ``Act of 1965'' and inserting ``Fund Act of 1965 
(16 U.S.C. 460l-4 et seq.)''.
                                 <all>
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00420

- CV
The City of Edinburg v. Maribel Reyna
On Appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 1901

- 19

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. W e further order this decision certified below for observance. February 9, 2023
The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge 1

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

___________

No. 96-2948

___________

Calvin J. Weber, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

United States of America, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: October 2, 1996

 Filed: October 10, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Calvin J. Weber, a former civilian Army engineer, appeals from the

district court's dismissal of his suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act 1

(FTCA) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record, and

conclude dismissal was proper. Accordingly, we affirm pursuant to 8th Cir.

R. 47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

BRANDEN WALLACE, 

 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Plaintiff Below, 

Appellee.

§ 

§ 

§ No. 295, 2019 

§ 

§ 

§ Court Below–Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1004000821 (N) 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 Submitted: August 30, 2019 

 Decided: October 31, 2019 

Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

ORDER 

 After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s 

motion to affirm, and the record below, we conclude that the judgment below 

should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior 

Court in its June 13, 2019 order summarily dismissing the appellant’s second 

motion for postconviction relief. Contrary to the appellant’s contention, a 

claim of ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel does not relieve a 

defendant of the burden of satisfying the requirements of Superior Court 

Criminal Rule 61(d)(2) in order to avoid the summary dismissal of a second 
2 

or subsequent postconviction motion.1

 Moreover, the appellant does not have 

a constitutional right to challenge the effectiveness of his postconviction 

counsel because he had no constitutional right to counsel in those 

proceedings.2

 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Justice 

 

1 Durham v. State, 2017 WL 5450746, at *2 (Del. Nov. 13, 2017). 

2 Asbury v. State, 2019 WL 4696781, at *4 (Del. Sept. 25, 2019).
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 184 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 184

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
     stamp should be issued in commemoration of Diwali, a festival 
                 celebrated by people of Indian origin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2003

Mr. Wynn submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
     stamp should be issued in commemoration of Diwali, a festival 
                 celebrated by people of Indian origin.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) a postage stamp should be issued by the United States 
        Postal Service in commemoration of Diwali, a festival 
        celebrated by people of Indian origin; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 972 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 972

  To clarify the effective date of the modification of treatment for 
retirement annuity purposes of part-time service before April 7, 1986, 
  of certain Department of Veterans Affairs health-care professionals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2003

  Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Ms. Lee, Mr. 
  Brown of Ohio, Ms. Millender-McDonald, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Serrano, Mr. 
 Dingell, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Payne, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. 
   McGovern, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Frost, Mr. Sanders, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. 
     Menendez, Mr. Kind, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. 
   Strickland, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Owens, and Mr. Farr) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the effective date of the modification of treatment for 
retirement annuity purposes of part-time service before April 7, 1986, 
  of certain Department of Veterans Affairs health-care professionals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE OF MODIFICATION OF TREATMENT FOR RETIREMENT 
              ANNUITY PURPOSES OF CERTAIN PART-TIME SERVICE OF CERTAIN 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS.

    (a) Effective Date.--The effective date of the amendment made by 
section 132 of the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs 
Enhancement Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-135; 115 Stat. 2454) shall be 
January 23, 2002, in the case of health care professionals referred to 
in subsection (c) of section 7426 of title 38, United States Code (as 
so amended), who retire on or after that date and in the case of health 
care professionals referred to in such subsection (c) who retired 
before such date, but after April 7, 1986.
    (b) Recomputation of Annuity.--The Office of Personnel Management 
shall recompute the annuity of each health-care professional described 
in the first sentence of subsection (c) of section 7426 of title 38, 
United States Code (as so amended), who retired before January 23, 
2002, but after April 7, 1986, in order to take into account the 
amendment made by section 132 of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
Health Care Programs Enhancement Act of 2001. Such recomputation shall 
be effective with respect to annuities paid for months after January 
23, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 12b-25
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A1                     4,463,281.35       7,911,434.41         0.00         73,452,965.59
A2A                    4,886,366.85      12,252,820.77         0.00         77,787,179.23
A2B                    5,878,909.51               0.00         0.00        101,930,500.00
A2C                    6,142,475.78               0.00         0.00        106,500,300.00
A3A                      906,072.05       3,294,681.97         0.00         13,462,818.03
A3B                    1,080,634.96               0.00         0.00         18,454,300.00
A3C                    1,190,880.90               0.00         0.00         20,337,000.00
AR                             0.58             100.00         0.00                  0.00
B1                       194,019.68               0.00         0.00          3,366,400.00
B2                       194,013.91               0.00         0.00          3,366,300.00
B3                       129,342.61               0.00         0.00          2,244,200.00
B4                       129,354.14               0.00         0.00          2,244,400.00
B5                        64,665.55               0.00         0.00          1,122,000.00
B6                        64,672.92               0.00         0.00          1,122,306.00
X                              0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 195 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 195

  Congratulating Sammy Sosa of the Chicago Cubs for hitting 500 major 
                           league home runs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2003

 Mr. Gutierrez (for himself, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Serrano, 
  Ms. Solis, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Costello, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Davis of 
  Illinois, Mr. Emanuel, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Rush, and Mr. Jackson of 
Illinois) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating Sammy Sosa of the Chicago Cubs for hitting 500 major 
                           league home runs.

Whereas Sammy Sosa of the Chicago Cubs hit a home run in the seventh inning on 
        Friday, April 4, 2003, against the Cincinnati Reds at the Great American 
        Ball Park;
Whereas his home run was the 500th of his career, making Sammy Sosa only the 
        18th player in major league history to reach the mark and the first 
        Latino to accomplish this outstanding feat;
Whereas Sammy Sosa's achievement is one of the most impressive and difficult to 
        accomplish in baseball history, placing him in the very select company 
        of the greatest home run hitters of all time, including Hank Aaron, Babe 
        Ruth, Mickey Mantle, Willie Mays, Mel Ott, and Ernie Banks;
Whereas from his first home run off Roger Clemens in 1989 to today, Sammy Sosa 
        has awed us with his ability and athletic prowess on the field and his 
        dignity and selflessness off the field;
Whereas Sammy Sosa has showed us how powerful the combination of discipline and 
        desire can be;
Whereas throughout his record-breaking career Sammy Sosa has embodied the 
        talent, exuberance, team-spirit, and determination that Americans 
        associate with the very best qualities of sports and athletic 
        competition;
Whereas throughout the intense media scrutiny and public attention that has 
        accompanied his historic career, Sammy Sosa has consistently conducted 
        himself with modesty and humility that has been an inspiration to all 
        Americans; and
Whereas as a native of the Dominican Republic, Sammy Sosa has proven to be an 
        outstanding role model and source of pride for all residents of his 
        native country, as well as all Latin Americans and all immigrants to the 
        U.S. from across the globe: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates and 
commends Sammy Sosa of the Chicago Cubs for his amazing accomplishment 
and thanks him for tearing down barriers for Latinos around the world, 
for being a role model and an inspiration, and for letting us dream as 
big as our hearts will allow.
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-60617

Summary Calendar

 

WEI TIAN LUO,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A 73 723 647

- - - - - - - - - -

June 10, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wei Tian Luo petitions for review of the decision of the Board

of Immigration Appeals that dismissed his appeal from the

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and

for a withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the record and

the briefs and determine that the Board’s decision is supported by

substantial evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194,

197 (5th Cir. 1996). The petition for review is DENIED.
No. 

-2-
** Exhibit      10.2**

**AMENDMENTS      TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS**

|                                                                                                                                                                                    |   | **Term                  of Agreement Extended** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
| **Name                  and Title**                                                                                                                                                     |   | **From**                                        | **To** |
|                                                                                                                                                                                    |   | **(December                  31 of each year)** |
| Harvey                  J. Berger, M.D.*Chairman                  and Chief Executive Officer*                                                                                          | 2009   | 2011                                            |
| Laurie                  A. Allen, Esq.*Senior                  Vice President, Legal and Business Development,Chief Legal Officer                  and                  Secretary*      | 2008   | 2010                                            |
| David                  L. Berstein, Esq.*Senior                  Vice President, Chief Patent Counsel*                                                                                  | 2008   | 2010                                            |
| Timothy                  P. Clackson, Ph.D.*Senior                  Vice President, Chief Scientific Officer*                                                                           | 2008   | 2010                                            |
| Edward                  M. Fitzgerald*Senior                  Vice President, Finance and Corporate Operations,Chief Financial                  Officer                  and Treasurer* | 2008   | 2010                                            |
| John                  D. Iuliucci, Ph.D.*Senior                  Vice President, Chief Development Officer*                                                                             | 2008   | 2010                                            |
| Richard                  W. Pascoe*Senior                  Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer*                                                                                    | 2007   | 2010                                            |
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Curis, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated:     February 27, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DENNIS T. JAMES, AN INDIVIDUAL,

ROBIN JAMES, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND

DENNIS T. JAMES AND ROBIN JAMES,

AS HUSBAND AND WIFE,

 Petitioners

 v.

PIER L. CHIARADIA, AN INDIVIDUAL,

AND COMMONWEALTH OF

PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION, AND

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 446 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

TRACY DEVON THOMAS, AKA Baby 8, AKA Yachin French, AKA Jachin French Jr., AKA Lil C, AKA S

- Man, AKA Tracy Devon French Thomas, AKA Jachin Tracy,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 50382

D.C. No.

2:16

- cr

- 00526

- FMO

- CR

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 11, 2019 Pasadena, California

Before: TASHIMA and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and ROBRENO, ** District Judge.

The district court properly admitte d the gun and ammunition seized pursuant

to a warran t authorizing the search of Tracy Thomas’ apartment. The warrant was

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

JAN 17 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL SPage 2 of 3

supported by probable cause. According to the warrant affidavit, t he victims of the

drive

- by shooting observed and reported the licen se plate number of the c ar used in

the shooting. Thomas was renting a car with that license plate number at t he time

of the shooting, and the car was returned approximately two hours after the

shooting took place. Thomas had his own car and lived in the same metropolitan

area where the shooting occurred. These facts gave rise to a “ fair probability ” that

Thomas was involved in the shooting. Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983).

The warrant affidavit also established probable cause to search the specified

apartment. The police determined that Thomas lived there by locating his car and

conducting surveillance outside of the apartment. Under the totality of the

circumstances , there was a fair probability that the firearm and other evidence

relati ng to the shooting would be found at Thomas’ apartment. S ee United States

v. Bowers , 534 F.2d 186, 190

– 92 ( 9th Cir. 1976). T he passage of two weeks

between the shooting and the search did not undermine the existence of probable

cause. See id. at 192

– 93.

T he district court properly admitted the statements that Thomas made at the

police station. Even assuming that Thomas’ arrest was unconstitutional, his

sta tements were admissible because they were taken while Thomas was in legal

custody and after he had waived his rights under Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436

(1966)

. See New York v. Harris

, 495 U.S. 14, 19

– 20 (1990). Thomas’ continuedPage 3 of 3

detention after the arrest was lawful because the police had probable cause to arrest

him for the shooting and fo r possessing the gun and ammu nition found at his

apartment. See id. at 18.

AFFIRMED.