alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|         /s/                Robert A.                Katz        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Robert                A. Katz                                                                                                              |
| Chief                Executive Officer                                                                                                     |

|         /s/                Jeffrey W.                Jones         |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jeffrey                W. Jones                                                                                                                    |
| Senior                Executive Vice President and                                                                                                 |
| Chief                Financial Officer                                                                                                             |
DENMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

EXHIBIT (32.1)

CERTIFICATIONS



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '
1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Denmark Bancshares, Inc. ("DBI"), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DBI for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DBI.



|/s/ John P. Olsen          
|---------------------------
|John P. Olsen,             
|Principal Executive Officer
|and President              



|/s/ Dennis J. Heim           
|-----------------------------
|Dennis J. Heim               
|Vice President and Treasurer,
|Principal Financial and      
|Accounting Officer           
|                             
|Date:  April 27, 2007
Order entered February 4, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00120 - CV No. 05 - 19 - 00121 - CV No. 05 - 19 - 00122 - CV IN RE MATTHEW REESE, Relator Original Proceeding f

rom the 203rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F14 - 00306 - P, F13 - 00723 - P, and F13 - 60347 - P 

### O RDER Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Reichek Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
Exhibit 23.1    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-02845, 333-42445, 333-42447, 333-44922, 333-47277, 333-61128, and 333-171362 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 29, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Wausau Paper Corp. and subsidiaries (the Company), and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011.   /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP  Milwaukee, Wisconsin February 29, 2012
##### 



EXHIBIT 8 THE WESTAIM CORPORATION Chief Financial Officers Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, G.A. (Drew) Fitch, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 40-F for the period ended December
31, 2003 of The Westaim Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function): 1




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 8  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 11, 2004 /s/ G.A. (Drew) Fitch 
 
 2
#### Andrew Sudesh NARAYAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-72601.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Dec. 21, 2012.

Saad Ahmad, Fremont, CA, for Petitioner.

Karen L. Melnik, Trial, Oil, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*676MEMORANDUM **

Andrew Sudesh Narayan, a native and citizen of the United Kingdom, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order denying Narayan’s motion to terminate. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing de novo questions of law, *Morales-Garcia v. Holder,*567 F.3d 1058, 1061 (9th Cir.2009), we deny the petition for review.

The agency properly concluded that Na-rayan’s conviction under section 273.5(a) of the California Penal Code constitutes a conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude (“CIMT”) because a modified categorical analysis of the record of conviction establishes that Narayan was convicted of inflicting corporal injury upon his spouse. *See United States v. Leal-Vega,*680 F.3d 1160, 1168-69 (9th Cir.2012) (holding that a criminal complaint, read together with other judicially noticeable documents, may be considered under the modified categorical analysis if no ambiguity exists in the record of conviction to conclude that the defendant was convicted of a generic federal offense); *Morales-Garcia,*567 F.3d at 1065 (affirming that spousal abuse constitutes a CIMT).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 10.20


Compensation Arrangements







The Registrant's Board of Directors determined that the performance of the organization in 2012 did not meet the criteria established by the Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. Amended 2005 Executive Cash Bonus Plan; therefore no cash bonuses would be paid to the Named Executive Officers, as indicated in the table below.  The Company implemented a three-year succession plan in 2010 which included a compensation study completed by PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLC under which the Board of Directors determined a Long-Term Incentive Grant ("LTI") would be awarded in restricted stock under the Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan subject to three-year vesting to the Named Executive Officers, as indicated in the table below.


	
Executive Name and Position

	 	
Cash Bonus

	 	 	
LTI Restricted Stock Grant (in shares)

	 
	
S. Russell Stubbs, President and Chief Executive Officer

	 	
$

	
-

	 	 	 	
54,700

	 
	
John Hickerson, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

	 	
$

	
-

	 	 	 	
48,000

	 
	
John McManama, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

	 	
$

	
-

	 	 	 	
25,700
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                           2,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,126
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,891
<PP&E>                                          52,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,313)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,377
<BONDS>                                          4,810
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       154,485
<OTHER-SE>                                   (133,327)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,454
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,997)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (118)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,315)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,315)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,315)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 17

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 8, 2003.

Whereas the Western Kentucky University Hilltoppers from

Bowling Green, Kentucky, won the 2002 NCAA Division

I–AA collegiate football national championship;

Whereas the national championship is the first for the Western Kentucky University football program since its inception in 1913;

Whereas the Hilltoppers had an impressive overall record of

12 wins and 3 losses during the 2002 season, which included 10 consecutive wins;

Whereas the Hilltoppers showed tremendous dedication to

each other, appreciation to their fans, sportsmanship to

their opponents, and respect for the game of football

throughout their 2002 season;

Whereas Western Kentucky University was represented with

integrity and principled leadership under the direction of

Head Football Coach Jack Harbaugh, Athletic Director

Dr. Wood Selig, and President Dr. Gary A. Ransdell; and

Whereas on December 20, 2002, the Western Kentucky University Hilltoppers, ranked 15th among Division I–AA

teams, defeated the top-ranked McNeese State University

Cowboys for the 2002 NCAA Division I–AA football
2

•HRES 17 EH

championship in Chattanooga, Tennessee, by a score of

34–14: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the

Western Kentucky University football team from Bowling

Green, Kentucky, for winning the 2002 NCAA Division I–AA

football championship.

Attest:

Clerk.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

189 

CA 11-00242 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ. 

 

KIMBERLY B. ROONEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN E. ROONEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

KAMAN, BERLOVE, MARAFIOTI, JACOBSTEIN & GOLDMAN, LLP, ROCHESTER

(RICHARD GLEN CURTIS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Philip

B. Dattilo, Jr., R.), entered April 21, 2010 in a divorce action. The

order determined the parties’ disputed economic issues. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs. 

Same Memorandum as in Rooney v Rooney ([appeal No. 3] ___ AD3d

___ [Feb. 17, 2012]). 

Entered: February 17, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 4-3. Selected labor force characteristics of Asians

0 20 40 60 80 100

Percent

In 2005, Asians comprised:

4 percent of those

working part time for

economic reasons

3 percent of the

unemployed

4 percent of the

labor force

5 percent of the

long-term unemployed

4 percent of 

marginally attached

workers

Chart 4-3. Selected labor force characteristics of Asians

• Asians made up about 4 percent of the labor force in 2005.

• They accounted for similar proportions of the unemployed and other 

categories of persons experiencing certain types of labor market difficulties.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 2, 2009
    By:
    /s/ John C. Hope, IIIJohn C. Hope, IIIChief Executive OfficerDated: March 2, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Thomas L. Callicutt, Jr.Thomas L. Callicutt, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO PURSUANT TO RULE13A-14(b) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranskaryoticTherapies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned, Michael J. Astrue, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)  the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                                                 | /s/ Michael J. Astrue |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| Dated:    November 14, 2003 | Michael J. Astrue     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                                                      |                       |  |

 

1

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Arturo DELGADO-ALMAZAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-40357

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Soko-low, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arturo Delgado-Almazan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Delgado-Almazan has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Delgado-Almazan’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Deborah A. Wensel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Deborah A. Wensel
Deborah A. Wensel
Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Great Lakes Dredge &
Dock Corporation and will be retained by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

32
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41074

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTIN PUENTE-MORENO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-03-CR-390-1

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Martin Puente-Moreno appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Puente-Moreno contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony”

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. 

He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one

under the lesser included offense found in 8 U.S.C. § 1362(a),

his judgment must be reformed to reflect a conviction only under
No. 03-41074

-2-

that provision, and his sentence must be vacated and the case

remanded for resentencing to no more than two years’ imprisonment

and one year of supervised release. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Puente-Moreno acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Amended and Restated Appendix B to the Consulting Service Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.35 
 RTW, INC. 
 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT 

APPENDIX B 

STATEMENT OF WORK – ALL OTHER SERVICES 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2013 
 RTW shall perform other
workers compensation and disability management services for CLIENT or CLIENT’s policyholders as agreed upon by the parties. 
 Claims
Management Services 
 RTW will provide claims management services for CLIENT or CLIENT’s policyholders on a cost basis
for the following types of claims: Incident Only, Medical Only and Indemnity. 
 RTW’s fees for the following services are as stated below:

  

			
	                              
  Nurse Case Management	  	 Up to $100 per hour

		
	                              
  Medical Bill Review	  	 Actual expense of vendor partner, Coventry, under its then-current agreement

		
	                              
  Medical Director	  	 $275 per hour


 RTW PlaceRite 
 RTW will provide the RTW PlaceRite alternative return-to-work services to CLIENT and CLIENT’s policyholders at a rate of $500 per referral. 

 

			
	State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
	State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company
	Meridian Security Insurance Company
	Meridian Citizens Mutual Insurance Company
	Milbank Insurance Company
	RTW, Inc.
		
	By: 	 	 /s/ Susan Bowron-White

		 	 Susan Bowron-White, Assistant Secretary