alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.5 The Westaim Corporation
Finance Code of Conduct for
Chief Executive and Senior Financial Officers The Westaim Corporations Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and
other employees of the finance organization hold an important and elevated role in corporate
governance in that they are uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that all stakeholders
interests are appropriately balanced, protected and preserved. The Board of Directors of The
Westaim Corporation has developed and adopted this Finance Code of Conduct applicable to its CEO,
CFO and other senior finance employees. All employees covered by this Finance Code of Conduct are accountable for adherence to this Code of
Conduct and will:  

Act responsibly and ethically, with honesty and integrity,
avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest between their
personal and professional relationships, ethically handling all
such actual or apparent conflicts of interest.

Provide stakeholders with information that is accurate, complete,
objective, fair, relevant, timely and understandable, including in
company filings with securities regulators or commissions and in
any other public communications made by The Westaim Corporation.

Comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations of federal,
provincial, state and local governments, and other appropriate
private and public regulatory agencies.

Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and
diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing
ones independent judgment to be subordinated.

Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course
of ones work except when authorized or otherwise legally
obligated to disclose.

Not use confidential information acquired in the course of ones
work for personal advantage.

Be an example of ethical behavior as a responsible partner among
peers, in the work environment and in the community.

Not unduly or fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate, or
mislead any authorized audit or interfere with any auditor engaged
in the performance of an internal or independent audit of the
companys financial statements or accounting books and records.

Promptly report any known violations of this Code of Conduct to
the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6525

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PAULA V. MOSS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-94-35, CA-97-139-4)

Submitted: September 22, 1998 Decided: October 19, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paula V. Moss, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Paula V. Moss seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Moss, Nos. CR-94-35; CA-97-139-4

(E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                                 THERATECH, INC.
                                -----------------
                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
                                                                --------------------------
Primary:                                                            1997           1996
                                                                -----------    -----------
<S>                                                              <C>            <C>       
      Weighted average shares of common stock                    20,713,802     20,215,634
      Common equivalent shares attributable to stock options        906,850      1,473,116
                                                                -----------    -----------
      Weighted average common and dilutive
          common equivalent shares                               21,620,652     21,688,750
                                                                ===========    ===========
      Net income                                                $ 3,862,985    $ 1,219,157
                                                                ===========    ===========
      Net income per share                                      $      0.18    $      0.06
                                                                ===========    ===========


Fully Diluted:

      Weighted average shares of common stock                    20,713,802     20,215,634
      Common equivalent shares attributable to stock options        957,039      1,473,116
                                                                -----------    -----------
      Weighted average common and dilutive
          common equivalent shares                               21,670,841     21,688,750
                                                                ===========    ===========
      Net income                                                $ 3,862,985    $ 1,219,157
                                                                ===========    ===========
      Net income per share                                      $      0.18    $      0.06
                                                                ===========    ===========
</TABLE>

s
# Fourth Court of Appeals Sa n Antonio, Texas

May 10, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00152

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Q.M.C ., A Child,

From the 57th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021PA00761 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. After receiving a twenty

- day extension of time, appellant’s brief was due on May 9, 2022. On that day, appellant filed a second motion requesting a ten

- day extension of time. After consideration, we grant the motion and order appellant to file her brief by May 19, 2022

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on thi s 10th day of May, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As
Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



March 29, 2004



In connection with the Large Scale Biology Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin J. Ryan, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Large Scale Biology Corporation for the fiscal periods
covered by the Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    KEVIN J.
RYANKevin J. Ryan President and
Chief Executive Officer Large Scale Biology Corporation
EXHIBIT 10.65



SMTC CORPORATION BOARD COMPENSATION



On September 29, 2004, the Board of Directors (Board) of SMTC Corporation revised the fees payable to
non-executive directors serving on the Board, effective as of January 1, 2005, as follows:



|                                                                                                         |  |     |        
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --- | -------
|                                                                                                         |  | $US
|Annual Board retainer                                                                                    |  | $   | 40,000 
|Minimum portion of retainer in form of stock or deferred share units (DSUs) until threshold* attained |  | $   | 25,000 
|Annual Audit Committee Member retainer                                                                   |  | $   | 4,000  
|Annual other Committee Member retainer                                                                   |  | $   | 2,000  
|Non-Executive Chairman of the Board additional compensation (no meeting fees)                            |  | $   | 35,000 
|Chairman of the Audit Committee  additional annual retainer                                             |  | $   | 6,000  
|Chairman of all other committees  additional annual retainer                                            |  | $   | 3,000  
|Board meeting fee  per meeting                                                                          |  | $   | 1,200  
|Committee meeting fee  per meeting                                                                      |  | $   | 1,200  
|Telephone meetings-Board  per meeting                                                                   |  | $   | 600    
|Telephone meetings-Committee  per meeting                                                               |  | $   | 600    
|                                                                                                         |  |     |        
|* Threshold of mandatory stock ownership after four years (in shares or DSUs)                           |  | $   | 100,000
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4608

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES MONROE COX,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (CR-03-28)

Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 27, 2004

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank W. Dunham, Jr., Federal Public Defender, Larry W. Shelton,

Supervisory Assistant Federal Public Defender, Norfolk, Virginia,

for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Robert J.

Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James Monroe Cox appeals the judgment order of the

district court convicting him of threatening to assassinate the

President of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 871

(2000). Finding no error, we affirm. 

Cox claims that he lacked the requisite intent to carry

out his threat and that the threat was actually made as part of a

deliberate attempt to remain incarcerated. Regardless of Cox’s

motivation, when questioned by the Secret Service, he clearly

expressed a present intent to harm the President if released from

incarceration. See United States v. Patillo, 438 F.2d 13, 16 (4th

Cir. 1971) (en banc). When the threat is considered in the context

of Cox’s violent history, we cannot conclude that insufficient

evidence supported Cox’s conviction. Accordingly, we affirm Cox’s

conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37189-37190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17939]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XQ55


Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of open public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the Marine

[[Page 37190]]

Fisheries Advisory Committee (MAFAC). The members will discuss and 
provide advice on issues outlined in the agenda below.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for August 11, 2009, from 2 - 3 p.m. 
Eastern Daylight Time.

ADDRESSES: Conference call. Public access is available at SSMC3, Room 
14817, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi Lovett, (301) 713-9070 x118; e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97dff2fef3feb9dbf8e1f2e3e3d7f9f8f6f6b9f0f8e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d890bdb1bcb1f694b7aebdacac98b6b7b9b9f6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MAFAC was established by the Secretary 
of Commerce (Secretary) on February 17, 1971, to advise the Secretary 
on all living marine resource matters that are the responsibility of 
the Department of Commerce. This committee advises and reviews the 
adequacy of living marine resource policies and programs to meet the 
needs of commercial and recreational fisheries, and environmental, 
State, consumer, academic, tribal, governmental and other national 
interests. The complete charter and summaries of prior meetings are 
located online at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ocs/mafac/.

Matters To Be Considered

    This agenda is subject to change.
    1. Discussion and consideration of recommendations on a national 
ocean policy, policy coordination and governance, and implementation 
strategy to the Federal Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force, submitted 
to MAFAC by the Governance Work Group.
    2. Discussion and consideration of recommended revisions and update 
to Vision 2020, MAFAC's report on the desired future state of U.S. 
marine fisheries, submitted to MAFAC by the Vision 2020 Work Group.

    Dated: July 23, 2009.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-17939 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In re: GUIDANT CORP. IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATORS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. Judith Maher v. Guidant Corp., et al., N.D. Illinois,

C.A. No. 1:07-6561.

MDL No. 1708.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

April 4, 2008.

Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN and ANTHONY J. SCIRICA *, Judges of the Panel.

*

 Judge Scirica took no part in the decision of this matter.

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel*: Plaintiff has moved, pursuant to Rule 7.4, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), to vacate our order conditionally transferring the action to the District of Minnesota for inclusion in MDL No. 1708. Defendants Guidant Corp. and Guidant Sales Corp. (collectively Guidant) oppose the motion to vacate.

After considering all argument of counsel, we find that this action involves common questions of fact with the actions in this litigation previously transferred to the District of Minnesota, and that transfer of this action to the District of Minnesota for inclusion in MDL No. 1708 will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. We further find that transfer of this action is appropriate for reasons that we set out in our original order directing centralization in this dock*1366et. In that order, we held that the District of Minnesota was a proper Section 1407 forum for actions involving claims arising from alleged defects in implantable defibrillators and pacemakers manufactured by Guidant. *See In re Guidant Corp. Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability Litigation,*398 F.Supp.2d 1371 (J.P.M.L.2005).

Plaintiff can present her motion for remand to state court to the transferee court. *See, e.g., In re Ivy,*901 F.2d 7 (2nd Cir.1990); *In re Prudential Insurance Company of America Sales Practices Litigation,*170 F.Supp.2d 1346, 1347-48 (J.P.M.L.2001).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, this action is transferred to the District of Minnesota and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Donovan W. Frank for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings occurring there in this docket.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 174 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 174

Recognizing the unique effects that proposals to reform Social Security 
                           may have on women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2003

   Ms. DeLauro (for herself, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
  Pomeroy, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Brown of 
Ohio, Mr. Tierney, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Honda, Ms. Solis, Mrs. 
 Maloney, Mr. Stark, Mr. Boswell, Mr. Farr, Ms. Lee, Ms. McCollum, Ms. 
 Roybal-Allard, Mr. Allen, Mr. Case, Mr. George Miller of California, 
Ms. Berkley, and Ms. Lofgren) submitted the following resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the unique effects that proposals to reform Social Security 
                           may have on women.

Whereas the Social Security benefit structure is of particular importance to 
        low-earning wives and widows, with 63 percent of women beneficiaries 
        aged 62 or older receiving wife's or widow's benefits;
Whereas three-quarters of unmarried and widowed elderly women rely on Social 
        Security for over half of their income;
Whereas without Social Security benefits, the elderly poverty rate among women 
        would have been 52.2 percent and among widows would have been 60.6 
        percent;
Whereas women tend to live longer and tend to have lower lifetime earnings than 
        men do;
Whereas women spend an average of 11.5 years out of their careers to care for 
        their families, and are more likely to work part-time than full-time; 
        and
Whereas during these years in the workforce, women earn an average of 70 cents 
        for every dollar men earn: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the unique 
obstacles that women face in ensuring retirement security and survivor 
and disability stability and the essential role that Social Security 
plays in guaranteeing inflation-protected financial stability for women 
throughout their entire old age, and it is the sense of the House of 
Representatives that the Congress and the President should take these 
factors into account when considering proposals to reform the Social 
Security system.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical Trial Planning Grant.                    

*Date:*                         August 13, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kenneth E. Santora, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-2550,                         *ks216i@nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 21, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-17833 Filed 7-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[No. 24247-1-III.

Division Three.

November 8, 2005.]

#### *In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of*John Bill Fletcher, *Petitioner.*

Petition for relief from personal restraint. *Granted in part*by unpublished per curiam opinion.