alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         136,035
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,467,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (128,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    459,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,722,207
<PP&E>                                      15,923,660
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,070,576)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,411,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,916,629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        289
<COMMON>                                         5,909
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,306,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,411,453
<SALES>                                     12,266,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,266,373
<CGS>                                        8,651,002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,653,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               334,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,277,812
<DISCONTINUED>                                  14,102
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   793,914
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARMEN E. CAMPBELL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

DR. ALEXANDER STEIN & BURL,

M.D.,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-57057

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-07183-GAF-JC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Carmen E. Campbell appeals pro se from the district court’s order

dismissing her medical malpractice action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

and entering a pre-filing order against her as a vexatious litigant. We have

FILED

JUL 13 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-57057

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction, Kuntz v. Lamar Corp., 385 F.3d 1177, 1181 n.6 (9th

Cir. 2004), and for an abuse of discretion a vexatious litigant order, De Long v.

Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1146 (9th Cir. 1990). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Campbell’s action for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction because Campbell’s claims against the named defendant all

arose under California state law and she conceded before the district court that

there was no diversity of citizenship. See Provincial Gov’t of Marinduque v.

Placer Dome, Inc., 582 F.3d 1083, 1086-87 (9th Cir. 2009) (federal question

jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 if a federal right or immunity is an

essential element of plaintiff’s claim or if state law claim raises a disputed and

substantial federal issue); Kuntz, 385 F.3d at 1181 (28 U.S.C. § 1332 requires

complete diversity of citizenship between the parties); see also Reynoso v.

Giurbino, 462 F.3d 1099, 1110 (9th Cir. 2006) (party is bound by concession to the

district court notwithstanding contrary position on appeal). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in entering a narrowly-tailored

vexatious litigant order against Campbell with notice and opportunity to be heard

based on her history of filing similar meritless actions against the defendant to try

to avoid the adverse consequences of a prior state court ruling. See De Long, 912
3 10-57057

F.2d at 1147-48 (setting forth factors for the entry of a pre-filing order against a

vexatious litigant under court’s inherent authority to curb abusive litigation).

Campbell’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
[No. 53708-3-I.

Division One.

November 7, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Eddie Edward Loney, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-1-00611-1, George T. Mattson, J., entered January 26, 2004. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unemployment rates by county and disaster assistance eligibility,

Alabama, October 2005, not seasonally adjusted

4.0% to 4.9%

3.9% or below

7.0% or more

6.0% to 6.9%

5.0% to 5.9%

Unemployment Rat

(State rate = 4.5%; U.S. rate = 4.6%)

Sumter

Choctaw

Clarke

Washington

Mobile

Baldwin

Hale

Perry

Autauga

Elmore

Marengo

Dallas

Wilcox

Lowndes

Montgomery

Monroe

Conecuh

Butler

Crenshaw

Covington

Escambia

Mobile

Montgomery

Sumter

7.5%

Choctaw

6.6%

Clarke

6.3%

Washington

6.1%

Baldwin

3.8%

Mobile

5.2%

Greene

6.1%

Hale

4.5%

Tuscaloosa

3.7%

Pickens

5.4%

Jefferson

4.6%

Bibb

4.2%

Perry

8.5%

Marengo

5.7%

Wilcox

8.9%

Monroe

6.5%

Marion

4.5%

Winston

5.3%

Lamar

5.4%

Cullman

4.0%

Colbert

5.0%

Lauderdale

5.0%

The labeled counties are eligible for

disaster assistance as of September 10.

NOTE:
Order entered April 24, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01119-CR

No. 05-12-01120-CR

ROBERT DESHON THOMAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F09-61035-V and F09-61036-V

ORDER

Appellant’s April 1, 2014 motion for discovery of grand jury transcripts is DENIED. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 21.0
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT*
                             AS OF SEPTEMBER 7, 1999

Anthem Admin Building LLC
Anthem Arizona L.L.C.
Anthem Golf and Country Club, Inc.
Asset One Corp.
Asset Four Corp.
Asset Five Corp.
Asset Six Corp.
Asset Seven Corp.
Bellasera Corp.
Coventry of California, Inc.
Del Webb Architectural Services, Inc.
Del Webb California Corp.
Del Webb Commercial Properties Corporation
Del Webb Communities, Inc.
Del Webb Communities of Nevada, Inc.
Del Webb Community Management Co.
Del Webb Conservation Holding Corp.
Del Webb Construction Services Co.
Del Webb Golf Corp.
Del Webb Home Construction, Inc.
Del Webb Homes, Inc.
Del Webb Limited Holding Co.
Del Webb Midatlantic Corp.
Del Webb Property Corp.
Del Webb Purchasing Company of Illinois, Inc.
Del Webb Southwest Co.
Del Webb Texas Limited Partnership
Del Webb Texas Title Agency Co.
Del Webb Title Company of Nevada, Inc., a
   Nevada corporation
Del Webb's Contracting Services, Inc.
Del Webb's Contracting Services of  Tucson, Inc.
Del Webb's Coventry Homes Construction Co.
Del Webb's Coventry Homes, Inc.
Del Webb's Coventry Homes of Nevada, Inc.
Del Webb's Coventry Homes Construction
  of Tucson Co.
Del Webb's Coventry Homes of Tucson, Inc.
Del Webb's Landscaping Services, Inc.
Del Webb's Spruce Creek Communities, Inc.
Del Webb's Stetson Hills, Inc.
Del Webb's Sun City Realty, Inc.
Del Webb's Sunflower of Tucson, Inc.
Del E. Webb Cactus Development Corp.
Del E. Webb Development Co., L.P., a Delaware
  limited partnership
Del E. Webb Financial Corporation
Del E. Webb Foothills Corporation
Del E. Webb Glen Harbor Development Corporation
DW Aviation Co.
DW Homebuilding Co.
Fairmount Mortgage, Inc.
Marina Operations Corp.
Mountain View II Aviation, LL, a North Carolina limited
  liability company
Mountain View One LLC
Mountain View Two LLC
New Mexico Asset Corporation
New Mexico Asset Limited Partnership
Spruce Creek South Utilities, Inc., a Florida corporation
Sun City Homes, Inc., a Nevada corporation
Sun City Sales Corporation, a Michigan corporation
Sun City Title Agency Co.
Sun City Title Agency of Illinois, Inc.
Sun State Insulation Co., Inc.
Terravita Commercial Corp.
Terravita Corp.
Terravita Home Construction Co.
Terravita Marketplace L.L.C.
Trovas Company
Trovas Construction Co.

*    All subsidiaries are Arizona  corporations or limited  liability  companies
     except the following:

     Del Webb Texas Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership
     Del Webb Title Company of Nevada, Inc., a Nevada corporation
     Del E. Webb Development Co., L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
     Del E. Webb Finance Company, a Nevada corporation
     Mountain View II Aviation, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company
     New Mexico Asset Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership
     Spruce Creek South Utilities, Inc., a Florida corporation
     Sun City Homes, Inc., a Nevada corporation
     Sun City Sales Corporation, a Michigan corporation
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Stebbins B.Chandor, Jr., certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of iPCS, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.      Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.      Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.      Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
| Date: December 22, 2005           |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ STEBBINS B. CHANDOR, JR. |   |
| Stebbins B.  Chandor, Jr.    |   |
| *Executive  Vice President and*        |   |
| *Chief  Financial Officer*             |   |

 

----
.1





Exhibit
32.1




CEO
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Focus Enhancements, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brett
Moyer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Brett A.
Moyer




Brett A.
Moyer




Chief
Executive Officer




August
14, 2008
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                         |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |

| Date: May 14, 2010 | /s/ C. Leo Smith                                                          |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |                                                                      |
|               | C. Leo Smith, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |
|               |                                                                      |

----
Exhibit 4.6(e)

__________

FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE

Dated as of October 18, 2002

to

INDENTURE

Dated as of May 11, 1999

among

VAIL RESORTS, INC., as Issuer,

the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors,

and

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Successor Trustee to 

UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK

____________________

up to $300,000,000

8 3/4 % Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009

FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE, dated as of October 18, 2002, among Vail Resorts, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Issuer"), the Guarantors named on the signature pages hereto (the "Guarantors"), the Additional Guarantors named on the signature pages hereto (collectively the "Additional Guarantors"), and The Bank of New York, as Successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (the "Trustee").

WHEREAS, the Issuer and the Guarantors have heretofore executed and delivered to the Trustee an Indenture dated as of May 11, 1999, as amended and supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 27, 1999, by the Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 16, 2001, and by the Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 16, 2002 (together, the "Indenture") providing for the issuance of up to $300,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 8 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 of the Company (the "Notes"); and

WHEREAS, subsequent to the execution of the Indenture and the issuance of $200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Notes, each of the Additional Guarantors have become guarantors under the Credit Agreement; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to and as contemplated by Sections 4.18 and 9.01 of the Indenture, the parties hereto desire to execute and deliver this Supplemental Indenture for the purpose of providing for the Additional Guarantors to expressly assume all the obligations of a Guarantor under the Notes and the Indenture;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, each party agrees, for the benefit of the other and for the equal and ratable benefit of the Holders of the Notes, as follows:

I.
EXHIBIT 23



                          CONSENT OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         As   independent   public   accountants,   we  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  by reference of our reports  included  herein or  incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-K, into Whitney Holding Corporation's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-56024, 33-55307, and 33-56277,
Form S-4 (File N0. 333-20509) and Form S-8 (File No. 33-68506).

                                                             Authur Andersen LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
March 28, 1997


                              Page 69 of 69 Pages
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

This certification isprovided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andaccompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) forthe quarter ended June 30, 2008 of Valence Technology, Inc. (the “Issuer”).

 

I, Robert L. Kanode, thePrincipal Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of myknowledge:

 
|   |   | (i)    | the Form 10-Q fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   |   | (ii)   | the information contained  in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.                                 |

 
| Dated: August 11,  2008 |                                                                                                                      |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | /s/ Robert L. Kanode                                                                                                      |
|                         | Robert  L. Kanode

President  and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive  Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 147 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 19, 2003.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 975) to amend title 11 of the United States Code, and for other 
purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 
Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under 
the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for 
the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature 
of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the 
bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 
as read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute are waived. No amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of 
a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be offered 
only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 
designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 
the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to 
a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 
Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 
may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 
Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature 
of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Order entered March 27, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00243

- CV

IN RE TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIMAN, Relator

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F94

- 01553

- ML



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/David L. Bridges/

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE