alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSTIN**

Aan, a, & Croetkwaft ootmtgJl.g¶itor Dallascounty DBuli8, !ibxatr Dear sir:Hon. J.L crosthuatt, Junel4, 1%s9,age&

neosseary

in the enrolw or the duties or pow'saoonferred upon them*...* On January15, 1991, thi8 d%parta%nt &id in an opinion

writtenby Hon. J. H. GtanforU, Assistant .dttornciy

General,

that the ao9ppi8elon%ra~ courtha8 ippxed power to aontraot for seniase or expertsin

. v*luation

of property.
cond%meion suits r0r right or way F2ub.m road purposoe

am alearly*'oomty **busine8eR.** ~3learly

the duty Or the %~B~I!&~J~IoIA%T&I' 0OUTt toaaks propsrpreparation

ror and defenss 0r cond%mation 6uit6 lnwhloh the oouaty is imolved. W-the 0OnaiSBi01M~rS court 0r Dallascounty reeb that it is necei3sar~ ror the OOUntJ' t0 %¶IplOJ' %Xl %w%l-t Uftll%%8 t0 t%6tim t8'tO t&l ~fatt0 or th0 land in gu%%tion in 00admti0n sat6 in order-to

tmrefgmrd

the Interest

or Dalla6County,then alearly

the oomlsslon%m~*

aourthas the pow%r to par such exp%rt

witn~ess

a r%asonabl%



### 03% r0r his ssnioeu, zehed0r%, gouxme mt3p00trulu advfeerl that it is the opinion0r 6lll.B departmallt

that ii the QR miMfOner8'ooUrt ~,EalklaaCoWlt~! ofth%opSl&o~
‘ that It is a%oeMary rot the 6ountyto aRp3ey ez~rxporti rftn088 t0 tQ8tiryin 00wt4mi0n 8tite r0r rigwi or. my ror $ublioroad purpoase and agree to paf swh expert wltnsss

a r%aacmab~s

f%% ~f~r~@u%h

&WV~OM aad appmve hiaalain,

ror such senloes, then you s h oald legallyapprove

forpaymntsmholalmof auohritneaa for expmt testlnony.
**Exhibit      10.11(c)**

**SECOND      AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT **

----

***[Remainder      of Page Intentionally Left Blank-Signature Page      Follows]***

----

**BORROWER:**

----

**LENDERS:**

**ADMINISTRATIVE      AGENT:**

----

**GUARANTOR**

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 697

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

to designate a high priority corridor in California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2003

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 

Act of 1991 to designate a high priority corridor in 

California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CALIFORNIA HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDOR.

4 Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor5 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2031; 109 Stat 

6 596; 112 Stat 190) is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(45) I–710 between the terminus at Long 

9 Beach, California, to State Route 60 in California.’’.

Æ
# 16SNR07_00

# image1.png
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with the accompanying Annual Report of TS Electronics, Inc.
(formerly  named  Softstone  Inc.)  (the  "Company")  on Amendment No. 2 to Form
10-KSB  for  the  fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Keith Boyd,
Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/  Keith  Boyd
Dated:  March 24, 2004                 ----------------------------------------
                                        Keith  Boyd
                                        Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-K  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.












                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 144

To express the sense of the House of Representatives that the maximum 

Pell Grant should be increased to $5,800. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2003

Mr. WU submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the maximum Pell Grant should be increased to $5,800.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM PELL GRANT. 

3 (a) FINDINGS.—The House of Representatives makes 

4 the following findings: 

5 (1) A college education has become increasingly 

6 important, not just to the individual beneficiary, but 

7 to the nation as a whole. The growth and continued 

8 expansion of the nation’s economy is heavily depend9 ent on an educated and highly skilled workforce. 
2

•HRES 144 IH 

1 (2) The opportunity to gain a college education 

2 also is important to the nation as a means to help 

3 advance the American ideals of progress and equal4 ity. 

5 (3) The Federal Government plays an invalu6 able role in making student financial aid available to 

7 ensure that qualified students are able to attend col8 lege, regardless of their financial means. Since the 

9 inception of the Pell Grant program in 1973, nearly 

10 80,000,000 grants have helped low- and middle-in11 come students go to college, enrich their lives, and 

12 become productive members of society. 

13 (4) Nationwide, almost 65 percent of high 

14 school graduates continue on to higher education. 

15 This degree of college participation would not exist 

16 without the Federal investment in student aid, espe17 cially the Pell Grant program. Nearly 25 percent of 

18 all undergraduate students receive some amount of 

19 Pell Grant funding. 

20 (5) In the next 10 years, the number of under21 graduate students enrolled in the nation’s colleges 

22 and universities will increase by 11 percent to more 

23 than 11,000,000 students. Many of these students 

24 will be the first in their families to attend college. 

25 One in 5 of these students will be from families with 
3

•HRES 144 IH 

1 incomes below the poverty level. The continued in2 vestment in the Pell Grant program is essential if 

3 college is to remain an achievable part of the Amer4 ican dream. 

5 (6) Increasing the maximum Pell Grant to 

6 $5,800 would result in a $1,800 increase in the 

7 maximum grant award. 

8 (7) Because Pell Grant recipients are more like9 ly to graduate with student loan debt and to amass 

10 more debt than other student borrowers, increasing 

11 the maximum Pell Grant to $5,800 will help remedy 

12 this disparity. 

13 (b) SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.—

14 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that the 

15 maximum Pell Grant should be increased to $5,800.

Æ
Exhibit 4.1


 




	
  

  	
  00000044601
  G210/01 CAPITA TEAR HERE SHARE CERTIFICATE G210/01 CERTIFICATE NO. L/A CODE
  INVESTOR CODE DATE AMOUNT IN FIGURES GW Pharmaceuticals plc (Incorporated in
  England and Wales under the Companies Act 1985 with registered number 4160917)
  THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the undermentioned is/are the registered holder(s) of
  Ordinary Shares of 0.1p each fully paid in GW Pharmaceuticals plc subject to
  the Articles of Association of the Company. NAME(S) OF HOLDER(S) AMOUNT IN
  WORDS THIS CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN DULY ISSUED AND AUTHORISED BY THE COMPANY IN
  ACCORDANCE WITH ITS ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION. NOTE: Any change in the
  ownership of the above (either in total or in part) will be registered only
  if both the transfer and this certificate are lodged with the Company's
  Registrar. Capita Registrars, The Registry, 34 Beckenham Road, Beckenham,
  Kent BR3 ATLI. THIS DOCUMENT IS VALUABLE AND SHOULD BE KEPT IN A SAFE PLACE
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 929

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,8 Dichloroanthraquinone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2003

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,8 

Dichloroanthraquinone.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 1,8 DICHLOROANTHRAQUINONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.29.09 1,8 

Dichloroanthraquinone (CAS No. 

82–43–9) (provided for in subheading 

2914.69.90) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 
2

•HR 929 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 251 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 251

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 303) to amend title 10, 
 United States Code, to permit retired members of the Armed Forces who 
 have a service-connected disability to receive both military retired 
    pay by reason of their years of military service and disability 
    compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs for their 
                              disability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2003

Mr. Marshall submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 303) to amend title 10, 
 United States Code, to permit retired members of the Armed Forces who 
 have a service-connected disability to receive both military retired 
    pay by reason of their years of military service and disability 
    compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs for their 
                              disability.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall without intervention of any point of order consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 303) to amend title 10, United States Code, to 
permit retired members of the Armed Forces who have a service-connected 
disability to receive both military retired pay by reason of their 
years of military service and disability compensation from the 
Department of Veterans Affairs for their disability. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) four hours of debate on 
the bill equally divided among and controlled by the chairmen and 
ranking minority members of the Committee on Armed Services and the 
Committee on Veterans' Affairs; (2) an amendment in the nature of a 
substitute printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of 
rule XVIII, if offered by Representative Hunter of California or his 
designee, which shall be considered as read and shall be separately 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.R. 303 pursuant to the first 
section of this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 
previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 
bill to a time designated by the Speaker on the same legislative day or 
until the following legislative day when consideration shall resume 
immediately after the third daily order of business under clause 1 of 
rule XIV.
                                 <all>
```
No. 1042.

#### Line Material Co. et al. *v.*Ooms, Commissioner of Patents.

May 13, 1946.

*Charles F. Meroni, Carlton Hill*and *William A. Smith, Jr.*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General Sonnett*and *Paul A. Sweeney*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 926

To amend the General Education Provisions Act to prohibit Federal education 

funding for elementary or secondary schools that provide access to emergency postcoital contraception. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2003

Ms. HART (for herself, Mr. PITTS, Mr. HAYES, Mr. PICKERING, Mr. TERRY, 

Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, 

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. PENCE, Mr. 

AKIN, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. FORBES, Mr. RYUN of Kansas, Mr. DEMINT, 

Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. PAUL, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. SCHROCK, Mr. 

RENZI, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS

of Virginia, Mr. BEAUPREZ, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. KLINE, 

Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mrs. NORTHUP, Mr. RYAN of 

Wisconsin, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. HOSTETTLER, 

Mr. CHABOT, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. VITTER, Mr. 

TOOMEY, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. STEARNS, and Mr. NORWOOD) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the General Education Provisions Act to prohibit 

Federal education funding for elementary or secondary 

schools that provide access to emergency postcoital contraception.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 926 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Schoolchildren’s 

3 Health Protection Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SCHOOLCHILDREN’S HEALTH PROTECTION. 

5 The General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 

6 1221 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new part: 

8 ‘‘PART E—SCHOOLCHILDREN’S HEALTH 

9 PROTECTION 

10 ‘‘SEC. 461. LIMITATION ON FUNDING. 

11 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal law, 

12 no funds shall be made available from any applicable pro13 gram to a State educational agency or local educational 

14 agency that distributes or provides to an unemancipated 

15 minor, on the premises or in the facilities of an elementary 

16 school or secondary school, postcoital emergency contra17 ception (such as the so-called ‘morning-after pill’) or a 

18 prescription for such contraception. 

19 ‘‘SEC. 462. DEFINITIONS. 

20 ‘‘In this part: 

21 ‘‘(1) The term ‘postcoital emergency contracep22 tion’ means any of the regimens described in the no23 tice entitled ‘Prescription Drug Products; Certain 

24 Combined Oral Contraceptives for Use as Postcoital 

25 Emergency Contraception’, published in the Federal 
3

•HR 926 IH 

1 Register on February 25, 1997 (62 FR 8610), or 

2 any subsequent corresponding notice. 

3 ‘‘(2) The term ‘unemancipated minor’ means an 

4 unmarried individual under 18 years old who is—

5 ‘‘(A) a dependent (as defined in section 

6 152(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986); 

7 and 

8 ‘‘(B) not emancipated under an applicable 

9 State law.’’.

Æ
IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS WILLIAM JOHNSON § § VS. § CASE NO. § THE STATE OF TEXAS §

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: NOW COMES, the appellant, William Johnson, by and through his assistant public defender Jani J. Maselli Wood, and respectfully moves the Court to grant an additional thirty days to file the petitions for discretionary review and for good cause would show: I. Mr. Johnson was convicted of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to eight years imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed on August 25, 2015 in an unpublished opinion in Cause Number 14-14-00475-CR. II. The petitions is due September 24, 2015. Mr. Johnson is requesting an additional thirty days to prepare the petition until October 24, 2015.

. PD-1254-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 9/22/2015 7:59:36 AM Accepted 9/24/2015 2:30:19 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKIII.

Un de rsi gned co uns el ha s nume rous de ad lin es in the ne xt thi rty da ys an d ha s be en

wo rkin g dil igen tly to ha nd le a ll h er ca se s: Briefs filed : Orla nd o Sa lin as v. Sta te , b rief

on rema nd fil led 9/ 7/ 201 5; Sh aq uil le Ash ton v. Sta te , b rief

fil ed on 9/ 2/ 201 5 Trial Set tin g C o u n s e l i s se t fo r tria l in Ja son Ha rrison v. Sta te , in the 179 th di stri ct co ur t o n Octo be r 8, 2 015 . Pre tria l co nf ere nc e wa s h eld Sep temb er 10 , 20 15. Ne w Cas es Coun se l ha s be en ap po in ted two ver y co mpl ica ted ca se s in the la st t w o w ee ks
. She is d ili gentl y wo rkin g on a mo tio n fo r ne w tria l d ue on Octo be r 1, 2 015
. W HE REF ORE, PRE M ISES CONSIDERE D, app ell an t res pe ctful ly p ray s that thi s Co urt gran t an ad di tio na l 30 da ys to fi le th e p etiti on for di sc retio na ry re vie w.

-2-Res pe ctful ly s ubmi tted ,
ALE XAN DER

BUN IN Chi ef P ubli c De fen de r Ha rris Coun ty Te xa s /s/ Ja ni J. Masel

li W ood

____ __________________________ _____ JANI J. M ASE LLI W OOD Sta te Ba r No. 007 911 95 120 1 Fra nk lin Stree t, 13 Flo or th Ho usto n, TX

770 02 (713 ) 274 -6 721 Attorn ey for App ell an t, Wi lliam Jo hn son

CER TIFICATE OF SE RV ICE Purs uan t to Tex
. R. Ap p . P r o c . 9. 5, thi s ce rtifi es tha t on Sep temb er 22, 201 5, a

co py of the fo rego in g wa s ema ile d to Lis a M cM in n, Sta te Pro se cutin g Attorn ey , an d the Ha rris Coun ty Dis trict Atto rne y’ s Off ice thro ugh tex fil e. co m at th e fo llo win g ad dr es s: M eli ss a H erv ey Ass ista nt Di stri ct Atto rne y 120 1 Fra nk lin Stree t, 6th Flo or Ho usto n, TX

770 02 He rve y_ M eli ss a @d ao .h ctx .n et Lis a M cM in n Lis a. M cM in n@S PA. tex as .go v /s/ Ja ni J. Masel li W ood

____ __________________________ _____ JA NI J. MA SE LLI WO OD -3-
No. 1225.

#### Phillips *v.*Ragen, Warden.

May 27, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Edgar County, Illinois, denied. *
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DENNIS M. BUCKOVETZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

THE NAVY,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-56376

D.C. No. 3:14-cv-02872-BENMDD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 18, 2017**

Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dennis M. Buckovetz appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action under the 

Administrative Procedures Act requesting a document be removed from his 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-56376 

personnel file. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo 

a dismissal on the basis of mootness. White v. Lee, 227 F.3d 1214, 1242 (9th Cir. 

2000). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Buckovetz’s action as moot because 

the Department of the Navy removed the document at issue from Buckovetz’s 

personnel file and confirmed that there is no reference to it in its human resources 

or Equal Employment Opportunity files. See Biodiversity Legal Found. v. 

Badgley, 309 F.3d 1166, 1173 (9th Cir. 2002) (“When a controversy no longer 

exists, the case is moot.”). Buckovetz has failed to show that any exception to the 

mootness doctrine applies to his action. See Pub. Utilities Comm’n of State of Cal.

v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm’n, 100 F.3d 1451, 1459-61 (9th Cir. 1996) 

(discussing exceptions to the mootness doctrine).

AFFIRMED.
EUGENE SMITH

,
Appellant,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREO F IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2288

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 23, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Hamilton County

. Andrew J. Decker, III , Judge

.
Eugene Smith, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney Gene ral, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
H. Res. 153

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 27, 2003.

Whereas the United States is currently engaged in a war on

terrorism in response to the attacks of September 11,

2001;

Whereas the Armed Forces of the United States are currently

engaged in a campaign to disarm the regime of Saddam

Hussein and liberate the people of Iraq;

Whereas, on June 1, 1774, the Virginia House of Burgesses

called for a day of fasting and prayer as an expression

of solidarity with the people of Boston who were under

siege by the enemy;

Whereas, on March 16, 1776, the Continental Congress, recognizing that the ‘‘Liberties of America are imminently

endangered’’ and the need ‘‘to acknowledge the overruling Providence of God’’, called for a day of ‘‘Humiliation, Fasting and Prayer’’;

Whereas, on June 28, 1787, during the debate of the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin, convinced of

God’s intimate involvement in human affairs, implored

the Congress to seek the assistance of Heaven in all its

dealings;

Whereas, on March 30, 1863, in the midst of the Civil War,

Abraham Lincoln, at the bequest of the Senate, and him-
2

•HRES 153 EH

self recognizing the need of the Nation to humble itself

before God in repentance for its national sins, proclaimed

a day of fasting, prayer and humiliation;

Whereas all of the various faiths of the people of the United

States have recognized, in our religious traditions, the

need for fasting and humble supplication before Providence;

Whereas humility, fasting, and prayer in times of danger

have long been rooted in our essential national convictions and have been a means of producing unity and solidarity among all the diverse people of this Nation as well

as procuring the enduring grace and benevolence of God;

Whereas, through prayer, fasting, and self-reflection, we may

better recognize our own faults and shortcomings and

submit to the wisdom and love of God in order that we

may have guidance and strength in those daily actions

and decisions we must take; and

Whereas dangers and threats to our Nation persist and, in

this time of peril, it is appropriate that the people of the

United States, leaders and citizens alike, seek guidance,

strength, and resolve through prayer and fasting: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the President should issue a proclamation—

(1) designating a day for humility, prayer, and fasting for all people of the United States; and

(2) calling on all people of the United States—

(A) to observe the day as a time of prayer and

fasting;
3

•HRES 153 EH

(B) to seek guidance from God to achieve a

greater understanding of our own failings and to

learn how we can do better in our everyday activities; and

(C) to gain resolve in meeting the challenges

that confront our Nation.

Attest:

Clerk.