alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
77

Table 32. Displaced workers 1 by age, sex, race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, and 

employment status in January 2006

Total

Total, 20 years and over.................. 3,815 100.0 69.9 13.4 16.7

 20 to 24 years.............................. 111 100.0 66.4 21.4 12.2

 25 to 54 years.............................. 2,841 100.0 74.5 13.4 12.0

 55 to 64 years.............................. 728 100.0 60.6 12.3 27.0

 65 years and over........................ 135 100.0 25.4 10.8 63.8

Women, 20 years and over............. 1,739 100.0 65.6 13.1 21.3

 20 to 24 years.............................. 44 100.0 ( 2 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 )

 25 to 54 years............................. 1,289 100.0 69.6 14.2 16.2

 55 to 64 years............................. 350 100.0 59.7 10.0 30.3

 65 years and over....................... 55 100.0 ( 2 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 )

Men, 20 years and over................. 2,076 100.0 73.5 13.6 12.9

 20 to 24 years............................. 67 100.0 ( 2 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 )

 25 to 54 years............................. 1,552 100.0 78.6 12.8 8.5

 55 to 64 years............................. 378 100.0 61.5 14.5 24.0

 65 years and over....................... 80 100.0 27.5 18.3 54.2

White

Total, 20 years and over................. 3,169 100.0 70.0 13.2 16.8

 Women....................................... 1,386 100.0 64.8 13.3 22.0

 Men........................................... 1,784 100.0 74.1 13.1 12.8

Black or African American

Total, 20 years and over.................. 452 100.0 71.2 13.4 15.4

 Women..................................... 271 100.0 70.7 11.5 17.9

 Men........................................... 181 100.0 72.1 16.3 11.6

Asian

Total, 20 years and over.................. 113 100.0 72.0 12.3 15.7

 Women..................................... 48 100.0 ( 2 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 )

 Men......................................... 65 100.0 ( 2 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 )

Hispanic or Latino ethnicity

Total, 20 years and over................ 416 100.0 60.2 22.9 16.9

 Women..................................... 187 100.0 56.2 20.3 23.5

 Men......................................... 230 100.0 63.5 25.0 11.5

Age, sex, race, and Hispanic

or Latino ethnicity

Total

(in

thousands)

Percent distribution by employment status

Total Employed Unemployed Not in labor 

force

1 Data refer to persons who had 3 or more years

of tenure on a job they had lost or left between

January 2003 and December 2005 because of plant

or company closings or moves, insufficient work, or

the abolishment of their positions or shifts. 2

 Data not shown where base is less than 75,000.

NOTE: Estimates for the above race groups

(white, black or African American, and Asian) do not

sum to totals because data are not presented for all

races. In addition, persons whose ethnicity is

identified as Hispanic or Latino may be of any race

and, therefore, are classified by ethnicity as well as

by race.

SOURCE: January 2006 Displaced Worker

supplement to the Current Population Survey, U.S.

Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

77
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 502

To require identification that may be used in obtaining Federal public benefits 

to meet restrictions ensuring that it is secure and verifiable. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2003

Mr. TANCREDO (for himself, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. SCHROCK, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. SMITH of Texas, 

Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. AKIN, Mr. GOODE, Mr. 

KING of Iowa, and Mr. MILLER of Florida) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary and House Administration, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To require identification that may be used in obtaining Federal public benefits to meet restrictions ensuring that 

it is secure and verifiable.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SECURE AND VERIFIABLE IDENTIFICATION RE4 QUIRED FOR FEDERAL PUBLIC BENEFITS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the provision in the United 

6 States of a Federal public benefit or service, including a 
2

•HR 502 IH 

1 law enforcement service, that requires the recipient to 

2 produce identification, no Federal agency, commission, or 

3 other entity within the executive, legislative, or judicial 

4 branch of the Federal Government may accept, recognize, 

5 or rely on (or authorize the acceptance or recognition of, 

6 or the reliance on) any identification document, unless the 

7 document was issued by a Federal or State authority and 

8 is subject to verification by a Federal law enforcement, 

9 intelligence, or homeland security agency. 

10 (b) IMMUNITY.—An elected or appointed official, em11 ployee, or other contractor or agent of the Federal Govern12 ment who takes an action inconsistent with subsection (a) 

13 is deemed to be acting beyond the scope of authority 

14 granted by law and shall not be immune from liability for 

15 such action, unless such immunity is conferred by the 

16 Constitution and cannot be waived. 

17 (c) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of the Con18 gress that the 50 States and the District of Columbia 

19 should implement policies modeled on this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 917 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 154
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 917

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                             June 20, 2003

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1830 South Lake Drive in Lexington, South Carolina, as the ``Floyd 
                     Spence Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1830 
South Lake Drive in Lexington, South Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Floyd Spence Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Floyd Spence Post Office 
Building''.

                                                       Calendar No. 154

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 917

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1830 South Lake Drive in Lexington, South Carolina, as the ``Floyd 
                     Spence Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 20, 2003

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert E. Dye, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peoples Bancorporation,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         d)  disclosed  in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: May 11, 2007                         s/Robert E. Dye, Jr.
      ------------                           ----------------------------------
                                           Robert E. Dye, Jr.
                                           Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,717,000
<SECURITIES>                                28,869,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  192,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,512,000
<PP&E>                                       6,614,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,081,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,247,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,137,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        76,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,034,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,247,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,695,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,313,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,136,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,136,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,136,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 13

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 8, 2003.

Whereas on December 14, 2002, the Grand Valley State University Lakers won the 2002 NCAA Division II Football

National Championship by defeating Valdosta State University;

Whereas this national championship is the school’s first in a

varsity sport;

Whereas the Lakers won the 2002 Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (GLIAC) Football Championship with a perfect 9–0 record in league play;

Whereas the Lakers completed the 2002 season with a perfect 14–0 record, and won 33 of its last 34 games;

Whereas Head Coach Brian Kelly has been with the team

since 1991, and has led the team to a 104–34–2 overall

record;

Whereas the Lakers returned 51 letter winners, including 16

starters from the 2001 team that fell only to North Dakota in the NCAA Division II National Championship

game;

Whereas the Lakers placed 18 players on the 2002 AllGLIAC team;
2

•HRES 13 EH

Whereas quarterback Curt Anes was named the GLIAC Player of the Year for the second straight year and earned

the 2002 Harlon Hill Trophy as NCAA Division II’s

most outstanding player;

Whereas the Lakers’ defense dominated opponents by ranking 34th in the Nation in rushing defense and recording

58 quarterback sacks;

Whereas the students, alumni, faculty, and fans of Grand

Valley State University showed their support by helping

the Lakers set a GLIAC record for regular-season attendance; and

Whereas the Lakers have displayed great strength, ability,

and perseverance this season and have made the State of

Michigan proud: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) congratulates the Grand Valley State University

Lakers for winning the 2002 NCAA Division II Football

National Championship and recognizes all the players,

coaches, and support staff who were instrumental in this

achievement;

(2) requests that the President recognize the accomplishments of the 2002 Grand Valley State University football team and invite them to Washington, D.C.,

for a White House ceremony for national championship

teams; and
3

•HRES 13 EH

(3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to

Grand Valley State University for appropriate display.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 162 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 162

  Expressing support for a National Week of Reflection and Tolerance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2003

 Mr. Rangel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for a National Week of Reflection and Tolerance.

Whereas the United States is a pluralistic country comprised of different races, 
        genders, ethnic groups, religions, and creeds;
Whereas our Nation, founded on the principles of tolerance, diversity, justice, 
        and equality, should affirm these common values and principles; and
Whereas the people of the United States should reflect on the importance of 
        understanding and tolerance in our pluralistic country: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That a National Week of Reflection and Tolerance should 
be established encouraging communities and institutions around the 
Nation to engage in events and activities that are reflective, 
educational, celebratory, and healing as they relate to diversity among 
the people of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.1





EXHIBIT 10.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No.
333-155427) and Form S-8 (No. 333-151802) of Unilever N.V. and on Form F-3 (No. 333-155427-02) and
Form S-8 (No. 333-103491-01) of Unilever PLC of our report dated 3 March 2009 relating to the
financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which
appears in this Form 20-F.




Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 6 March 2009

PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V.

As auditors of Unilever N.V.




/s/ Drs R A J Swaak RA




Drs R A J Swaak RA




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

London, United Kingdom

As auditors of Unilever PLC




6 March 2009
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report of The Washington Post Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008 (the Report),
Donald E. Graham, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of the Company, and Hal S. Jones, Senior Vice PresidentFinance (principal financial officer) of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 25, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald E. Graham                      
|                        |  |  |  | Donald E. Graham Chief
Executive Officer  
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 25, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Hal S. Jones                          
|                        |  |  |  | Hal S. Jones Senior Vice
PresidentFinance
Advance copies of this statement are made available to the 

press under lock-up conditions with the explicit 

understanding that the data are embargoed until 8:30 a.m. 

Eastern Daylight Time.

Statement of

Kathleen P. Utgoff

Commissioner

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Friday, August 1, 2003

Nonfarm payroll employment continued to trend down in 

July. Job losses persisted in manufacturing and a number 

of other industries. These declines were partly offset by 

employment gains in temporary help and other serviceproviding industries. Since January, payroll employment 

has decreased by 486,000. Over the month, the unemployment 

rate edged down to 6.2 percent. 

Manufacturing employment decreased by 71,000 in July, 

with job losses continuing to be widespread throughout the 

industry. The largest decline occurred in transportation 

equipment, where more auto workers than usual were off 

payrolls because of seasonal retooling. Other 

manufacturing industries with large over-the-month 

employment losses included computer and electronic 

products, fabricated metals, apparel, and textile mills. 
2

In addition to shedding jobs, many manufacturing industries 

cut hours in July. The overall factory workweek decreased 

by 0.2 hour to 40.1 hours.

Several other industries experienced employment 

declines over the month. Air transportation lost another 

9,000 jobs, bringing the total reduction since its recent 

peak in March 2001 to 136,000. Wholesale trade employment 

continued to trend down in July. The industry has lost 

415,000 jobs, or about 7 percent of its total, since March 

2000. Within retail trade, employment continued to decline 

in food stores, which have lost 209,000 jobs since April 

2000. 

In July, employment increased in the temporary help 

industry for the third straight month. This industry, 

which provides workers to businesses on an as-needed basis, 

has added 122,000 jobs since April. In recent months, 

employment also has increased in services to buildings and 

dwellings. Since March, the industry has added 36,000 

jobs. Accommodations employment rose for the second 

straight month. The number of jobs in finance continued to 

trend up, although at a slower pace. For the past 2 

months, job gains in the industry averaged about 7,000 per 

month, compared with 16,000 per month from August 2002 to 

May 2003. 
3

The unemployment rate, as measured by our household 

survey, edged down in July to 6.2 percent. The jobless 

rates for adult men, teenagers, and blacks eased back from 

levels reached in June.

Over the month, the labor force decreased by 556,000, 

offsetting a gain of similar magnitude in June. July’s 

drop in the labor force reflects marginal declines in both 

employment and unemployment. The labor force participation 

rate declined to 66.2 percent, the same as in March.

In summary, the labor market remained weak in July. 

Manufacturing and several other industries continued to 

lose jobs, while employment rose again in temporary help. 

The unemployment rate edged down to 6.2 percent.