alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Francis Peter CROSBY, Joseph Castagna, J. Leonard Goldberg, Philip Gordon, Guy Gully, William J. McCarthy, Eugene Meredith, Leo B. Mittelman, Worth Pettit, Jr., Paul Reicher, Philip Gordon & Company, Inc. and Texas Adams Oil Company, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 29, 1959.

S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr., U. S. Atty. for the Southern Dist. of New York, New York City, for United States, Anthony R. Palermo, Asst. U. S. Atty., Rochester, N. Y., of counsel.

Edward J. Ennis, New York City, for defendant William J. McCarthy.

Edward H. Levine, New York City, for defendant Eugene Meredith.

Joseph P. Marcelle, New York City, for defendant Worth Pettit, Jr.

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This is one of those oft occurring cases where a fundamental question arises which must have been answered over and over again but where no reported decision can be found which gives the answer.

The Government wishes to proceed with a trial of an indictment which names several individuals and a corporation, Texas-Adams Oil Company, Inc. The corporation has been summoned pursuant to Rule 9(c) (1) F.R.Crim.P. It has defaulted in appearance. The Government moves for the appointment of some one to represent the corporation.

Rule 43 provides that the defendant must be present at every stage of the trial and that a corporation may appear by counsel. The cases hold that a corporation may not appear except by counsel. Osborn v. United States Bank, 9 Wheat. 738, 830, 6 L.Ed. 204; Brandstein v. White Lamps, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 20 F.Supp. 369. A judgment of conviction of a corporation after a trial where it *16had not appeared by counsel would therefore be invalid.

That the court has the capacity to render a valid judgment is not open to question. It would be idle to provide for summoning a corporation if the court, after so doing, could not render judgment against it. The court must, therefore, have power to appoint one of its attorneys and officers to appear for the corporation.

Thomas Burchill, Esq., of the bar of this court, is already representing, in civil litigation in New York, the trustee in bankruptcy of defendant corporation. I appoint him to appear for the corporation. Since every step taken so far has been taken without representation of defendant corporation, the attorney so appointed will be at liberty to adopt any procedure which he considers advisable to contest the jurisdiction of this court or the propriety of the proceeding.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of a Change in Status of an Extended Benefit (EB) Period 
for Alaska

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility 
under the EB Program for Alaska.
    The following change has occurred since the publication of the last 
notice regarding the State's EB status:
    <bullet> As of January 10, 2009, Alaska has completed a mandatory 
13-week ``off'' trigger period. Based on data reported by the Bureau of 
Labor Statistics on December 19, 2008, Alaska's 3-month seasonally 
adjusted total unemployment rate was 7.1 percent and equals or exceeds 
110 percent of the corresponding rate in both prior years. This causes 
Alaska to be triggered ``on'' to an EB period beginning January 25, 
2009.

Information for Claimants

    The duration of benefits payable in the EB Program, and the terms 
and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-
State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and 
the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department 
of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an EB period, the State 
Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement 
to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular benefits and 
is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)).
    Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB, or who wish to 
inquire about their rights under the program, should contact their 
State Workforce Agency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce 
Security, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Bldg. Room S-
4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is 
not a toll-free number) or by e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#16717f74747978653865757962625672797a38717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a0d030808050419441909051e1e2a0e0506440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of January 2009.
Douglas F. Small,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment and Training.
[FR Doc. E9-1756 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17888]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R8-FHC-2009-N152; 81331-1334-8TWG-W4]


Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG) affords 
stakeholders the opportunity to give policy, management, and technical 
input concerning Trinity River (California) restoration efforts to the 
Trinity Management Council (TMC). The TMC interprets and recommends 
policy, coordinates and reviews management actions, and provides 
organizational budget oversight. This notice announces a TAMWG meeting, 
which is open to the public.

DATES: TAMWG will meet from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Thursday, September 10, 
2009.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Trinity County Library, 211 
Main St., Weaverville, CA 96093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meeting information: Randy A. Brown, 
TAMWG Designated Federal Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1655 
Heindon Road, Arcata, CA 95521; telephone: (707) 822-7201. Trinity 
River Restoration Program (TRRP) information: Mike Hamman, Executive 
Director, Trinity River Restoration Program, P.O. Box 1300, 1313 South 
Main Street, Weaverville, CA 96093; telephone: (530) 623-1800; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e984818884848887a98499c79c9a8b9bc78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dbb6b3bab6b6bab59bb6abf5aea8b9a9f5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), this notice announces a meeting 
of the TAMWG. The meeting will include discussion of the following 
topics:
    <bullet> Perspectives from Grand Canyon and Platte River 
restoration;
    <bullet> Status of TAMWG recommendations;
    <bullet> Progress towards a Request for Proposal (RFP) based 
science program;
    <bullet> Channel rehabilitation program;
    <bullet> Evaluation of hatchery goals and practices;
    <bullet> Fish population trends; and
    <bullet> Watershed work program.
    Completion of the agenda is dependent on the amount of time each 
item takes. The meeting could end early if the agenda has been 
completed.

    Dated: July 22, 2009.
Randy A. Brown,
Designated Federal Officer, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, Arcata, 
CA.
[FR Doc. E9-17888 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**LAWRENCE J. HANDLOVIC,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 928 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 23rd day of March, 2016, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 142 (Monday, July 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, July 13, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 
July 14, 2009, 6 p.m., The George Washington University Inn, 824 New 
Hampshire Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the 
Federal Register on June 26, 2009, 74 FR 30597-30598.
    The meeting will be held August 10, 2009 to August 11, 2009. The 
meeting time and location remain the same.
    The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: July 20, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17827 Filed 7-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 32189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Inventory Completion: Oregon State University 
Department of Anthropology, Corvallis, OR; Correction

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves 
Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the 
completion of an inventory of human remains in the possession of Oregon 
State University Department of Anthropology, Corvallis, OR. The human 
remains were removed from Harney County, OR.
    This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's 
administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). 
The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the 
museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the Native 
American human remains and associated funerary objects. The National 
Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice.
    The accession record number for human remains described in a Notice 
of Inventory Completion published in the Federal Register (74 FR 20944, 
April 17, 2008) was listed incorrectly. This notice deletes the 
reference to the accession number in the Federal Register of April 17, 
2008, by substituting the following paragraph for paragraph number 4:
    On an unknown date, human remains representing a minimum of one 
individual were removed from a site in Drewsey, Harney County, OR. The 
donor and circumstances of removal are unknown. No known individual was 
identified. No associated funerary objects are present.
    Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to 
be culturally affiliated with the human remains should contact Dr. 
David McMurray, Oregon State University Department of Anthropology, 238 
Waldo Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, telephone (541) 737-4515, before 
August 6, 2009. Repatriation of the human remains to the Burns Paiute 
Tribe of the Burns Paiute Indian Colony of Oregon may proceed after 
that date if no additional claimants come forward.
    Oregon State University Department of Anthropology is responsible 
for notifying the Burns Paiute Tribe of the Burns Paiute Indian Colony 
of Oregon; Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw 
Indians of Oregon; Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of 
Oregon; Confederated Tribes of the Siletz Reservation, Oregon; 
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Oregon; 
Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon; Coquille 
Tribe of Oregon; Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Indians of Oregon and the 
Klamath Tribes, Oregon that this notice has been published.

    Dated: June 15, 2009
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. E9-16015 Filed 7-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-50-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 4, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-04-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       26
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (1)
<INVENTORY>                                         32
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    58
<PP&E>                                             115
<DEPRECIATION>                                      47
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               14
<BONDS>                                             73
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                          48
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       185
<SALES>                                             39
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    39
<CGS>                                               30
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06-14-00075-CV

Billy Lee Copeland

v.

Ashley Nicole Moreland

(No. 1964 IN COUNTY COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51 FEE

INDIGENT

MOTION FEE

CLERK'S RECORD

$100.00

$20.00

$50.00

$25.00

$10.00

$25.00

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

E-PAID

PAID

THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, PC

THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, PC

THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, PC

THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, PC

RUBY BOLTON

RUBY K. BOLTON

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE 

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct 

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, 

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 

witness my hand and the Seal of 

the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Sixth District of Texas, this 

April 30, 2015.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___________________________

Deputy
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

t0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142927-8 

KIRK LEAPHART, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142927-8 

 COA: 301288, 301338 

Wayne CC: 09-026822-NO 

FOURMIDABLE GROUP, INC., and 

DETROIT HOUSING COMMISSION, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### BONEFOND v. BORDEN CO.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Jan. 19, 1952.

Nathan Baker, New York City, for plaintiff.

*184Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Hadley, New York City, for defendant.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Plaintiff has failed to show good cause for the production of the statements of the captain and the crew member requested in Item “(f)”. It appears that plaintiff’s attorney has obtained statements from these witnesses. If further information is required, their depositions may be taken. In the event plaintiff is unable to obtain their depositions, he may move for the production of their statements upon a showing of good cause.

As to Item “(g)”, no claim is made that the investigations and reports concerning the accident constitute the work product of defendant’s attorney. Nevertheless, good cause must be shown for their production and such showing has not been made. Were these reports made by defendant’s officers in the regular course of business, their production could be demanded. But the reports sought do not fall into that category and it is well recognized that a party must prepare his own case for trial, and absent unusual circumstances, may not obtain the fruits of his adversary’s trial preparations. Bifferato v. States Marine Corp., D.C., 11 F.R.D. 44. This aspect of the motion is denied without prejudice to renewal upon a showing of good cause.

Settle order on notice.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, John E. Baker, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2004





/s/ John E. Baker

John E. Baker

Senior Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer
#### SIELAND et al. v. HAMEL et al.

No. 1554.

United States District Court E. D. Missouri, S. E. D.

March 12, 1953.

See also, 13 F.R.D. 447.

*21Strom & Spradling, Cape Girardeau, Mo., and Homer F. Williams, Marble Hill, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Jacoby, Patton & Manns, Alton, 111., and Finch & Finch, Cape Girardeau, Mo., for defendants.

HULEN, District Judge.

In a will contest, proceedings for establishing or setting aside a will, filed and probated, or rejected, by a Probate Court in Missouri, must be in accord with statutory law of Missouri, including trial by jury, or by the Court if jury is waived. Summary judgment rule procedure in the Federal Court does not supplant Missouri statutory provisions governing the subject.

Order

Motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment is overruled.