alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on

the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."

Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 94-50264

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAIME HELEDORO-RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(USDC No. DR-94-CR-18)

_________________________________________________________________

November 28, 1995

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's pro se

motion entitled "Modification of Sentence Under 18 U.S.C. §

3582(b)(2)", which the district court apparently treated as a

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Appellant argues that his guilty

plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered, and that his

counsel was ineffective. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's

dismissal of the motion.

AFFIRMED.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 94

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide for the use of unexpended universal service funds in low-income schools, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide for 

the use of unexpended universal service funds in lowincome schools, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Access to 

5 Technology Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

7 Section 254(h) of the Communications Act of 1934 

8 (47 U.S.C. 254(h)) is amended— 
2

•HR 94 IH 

1 (1) by redesignating paragraph (7) as para2 graph (8); and 

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the fol4 lowing new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(7) ADDITIONAL ELIGIBLE USES FOR RE6 VERTING FUNDS.—

7 ‘‘(A) UNEXPENDED BALANCES AVAILABLE

8 FOR EXPANDED PURPOSES.—If at the conclu9 sion of any program year, any amount which 

10 has been authorized for payment for eligible 

11 services under this section remains unexpended, 

12 such amount shall be available for distribution 

13 under this paragraph to schools serving eligible 

14 school districts for expanded services during the 

15 succeeding program year, except that—

16 ‘‘(i) the total amount so made avail17 able shall not exceed $100,000,000 for any 

18 program year; and 

19 ‘‘(ii) the amount made available to 

20 any individual school for any program year 

21 shall not exceed $25,000. 

22 ‘‘(B) EXPANDED SERVICES.—Funds avail23 able under this paragraph may be used to ac24 quire, in addition to the telecommunications 

25 services available under this subsection, infor-
3

•HR 94 IH 

1 mation services, including devices necessary to 

2 access and use such services. 

3 ‘‘(C) DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS FOR EX4 PANDED SERVICES.—Funds shall be made 

5 available under this paragraph by a system of 

6 random selection from schools serving eligible 

7 school districts that have submitted applications 

8 complying with such regulations as the Com9 mission shall prescribe for purposes of this 

10 paragraph. 

11 ‘‘(D) ELIGIBLE SCHOOL DISTRICT.—The 

12 term ’eligible school district’ means, for any 

13 program year, a local educational agency that is 

14 eligible for a concentration grant under section 

15 1124A of the Elementary and Secondary Edu16 cation Act of 1965 for the preceding fiscal 

17 year.’’.

Æ
Exhibit No. 10.5


 


CITIZENS
BANCSHARES CORPORATION


 


 


Senior Executive Officer Waiver


 


 


In consideration for the benefits I will
receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the United States
Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby
voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or any state or territory
thereof or my employer or any of its directors, officers, employees and agents
for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required in order to
comply with Section 111 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of
2008, as amended (“EESA”), and
rules, regulations, guidance or other requirements issued thereunder
(collectively, the “EESA Restrictions”).


 


I acknowledge that the EESA Restrictions may
require modification of the employment, compensation, bonus, incentive,
severance, retention and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and
agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements), whether or not
in writing, that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they
relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of
my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program and I hereby
consent to all such modifications.  I
further acknowledge and agree that if my employer notifies me in writing that I
have received payments in violation of the EESA Restrictions, I shall repay the
aggregate amount of such payments to my employer no later than fifteen business
days following my receipt of such notice.


 


This waiver includes all claims I may have
under the laws of the United States or any other jurisdiction related to the
requirements imposed by the EESA Restrictions (including without limitation,
any claim for any compensation or other payments or benefits I would otherwise
receive absent the EESA Restrictions, any challenge to the process by which the
EESA Restrictions were adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the
effect of the foregoing on my employment relationship) and I hereby agree that
I will not at any time initiate, or cause or permit to be initiated on my
behalf, any such claim against the United States, my employer or its directors,
officers, employees or agents in or before any local, state, federal or other
agency, court or body.


 


(Remainder of page intentionally left
blank)


 

















 


 


In witness whereof, I execute this waiver on
my own behalf, thereby communicating my acceptance and acknowledgement to the
provisions herein.


 


	
   

  	
  Respectfully,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  
	
   

  	
  Date:
Exhibit 13.1



Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:



|1. | I, Samuel M.H. Lai, am the Chief Executive Officer (Acting) of Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation (the Corporation).
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To the best of my knowledge:
|-- | ----------------------------



| | (A) | The Corporations Form 20-F accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: June 24, 2005



/s/ Samuel M.H. LaiName:

Samuel M.H. LaiTitle:

Chief Executive Officer (Acting)




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS
WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO KOWLOON-CANTON RAILWAY CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY KOWLOON-CANTON RAILWAY CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS
STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit 4.13 Bill of Sale






Exhibit 4.13


BILL OF SALE


THIS BILL OF SALE, dated for convenience of reference as of December 1, 2012, from MASLAND CARPETS, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as "Vendor," to the DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF GORDON  COUNTY,  a public body corporate and politic of the State of Georgia, hereinafter referred to as "Vendee."


WITNESSETH


Vendor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 ($10.00) Dollars, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby bargain, sell and convey and by these presents has bargained, sold and conveyed, unto Vendee, its successors and assigns, all of its right, title and interest in the items of building fixtures, furnishings, machinery and equipment described on Exhibit B attached hereto (the "Equipment") which are to be included in the "Project" that is  to  be  leased  by  Vendee  to Vendor under Lease Agreement, dated as of December I, 2012, relating to the Project, which Project is both (i) located or to be located on the parcel of land in Gordon County, Georgia, described in Exhibit A, and (ii) financed by the Vendee's Taxable Revenue Bond  (Masland Carpets, LLC Real Estate Project), Series 20 l 2A. Title to items of the  Equipment  located  on such land at the time of delivery of this Bill of Sale shall vest in the Vendee upon delivery hereof and title to items of Equipment hereafter located on said land shall vest in Vendee immediately upon the same being located on such land.


Vendor warrants not as to the merchantability or "fitness for purpose" of the Equipment or as to any encumbrances thereon. Vendee shall accept, as of the date Vendee acquires title thereto, each such item of such property in "as is, where is" condition and subject to the interests, if any, of third parties therein. Vendor acknowledges and agrees that any indebtedness or payment obligation of Vendor that may be secured by or related to any such items of Equipment shall not become an indebtedness or payment obligation of the Vendee, and the Vendor shall remain responsible for the payment thereof.




[SIGNATURE ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Vendor has caused these presents to be executed by its duly authorized officer, under seal, the day and year first above written.


MASLAND CARPETS, LLC,
a Georgia limited liability company




By: /s/ Jon A. Faulkner              (Seal)
Jon A. Faulkner, President








(SIGNATURE PAGE TO BILL OF SALE (REAL ESTATE PROJECT)





































EXHIBIT B


THE EQUIPMENT
Exhibit 32





Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





The undersigned, who are the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of Peoples Bancorporation, Inc., each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, the accompanying Form 10-Q of the issuer fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.





May 11, 2011





/s/L. Andrew Westbrook, III------------------------------------------------L. Andrew Westbrook, IIIChief Executive Officer/s/Robert E. Dye, Jr.------------------------------------------------Robert E. Dye, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statement  on Form  S-3  (No.  33-54831  and No.  33-63845)  and  Form  S-8 (No.
33-54801, No. 33-56281,  No. 333-64217,  No. 333-36985 and No. 333-64784) of WHX
Corporation  of our  report  dated  April 13,  2004  relating  to the  financial
statements  and our  report  dated  April 13,  2004  relating  to the  financial
statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
April 13, 2004
```
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 342

Supporting the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., of Galesburg, Illinois, 

in its endeavor to erect a monument known as the National Railroad 

Hall of Fame. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2003

Mr. EVANS (for himself, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. 

RUSH, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. FROST, Mr. 

DAVIS of Illinois, and Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION

Supporting the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., of 

Galesburg, Illinois, in its endeavor to erect a monument 

known as the National Railroad Hall of Fame.

Whereas Galesburg, Illinois, has been linked to the history of 

railroading since 1849 when the Peoria and Oquawka 

Railroad was organized; 

Whereas the citizens of Galesburg supported a railroad to 

Chicago which was chartered as the Central Military 

Tract Railroad in 1851; 

Whereas upon completion of the Central Military Tract Railroad, the Northern Cross Railroad joined the Central 

Military Tract Railroad at Galesburg; 
2

•HRES 342 IH 

Whereas in 1886 Galesburg secured the Atchison, Topeka, 

and Santa Fe Railway and became one of the few places 

in the world served by 2 major railroads; 

Whereas the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., has been 

established in Galesburg and chartered under the laws of 

the State of Illinois as a not-for-profit corporation; 

Whereas the objectives of the National Railroad Hall of 

Fame, Inc., include (1) perpetuating the memory of leaders and innovators in the railroad industry, (2) fostering, 

promoting, and encouraging a better understanding of 

the origins and growth of railroads, especially in the 

United States, and (3) establishing and maintaining a library and collection of documents, reports, and other 

items of value to contribute to the education of all persons interested in railroading; and 

Whereas the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., is planning to erect a monument known as the National Railroad Hall of Fame to honor the men and women who actively participated in the founding and development of 

the railroad industry in the United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the National Railroad Hall of Fame, Inc., of Galesburg, 

3 Illinois, in its endeavor to erect a monument known as 

4 the National Railroad Hall of Fame.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 317 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 15, 2003.
    Resolved, That the election contest relating to the office of Representative 
from the Second Congressional District of Hawaii is dismissed.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
H. Res. 357

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 30, 2003.

Whereas Bob Hope was born Leslie Townes Hope on May

29, 1903, in Eltham, England, and immigrated to the

United States in 1907 at the age of 4;

Whereas Bob Hope entertained America on the vaudeville circuit, the Broadway stage, and in over 1,100 radio shows,

75 movies, and 475 television programs;

Whereas for more than 5 decades Bob Hope entertained the

Nation’s troops overseas with the United Service Organizations (USO), putting on shows during World War II,

the Korea War, the Vietnam War, and the first Persian

Gulf War;

Whereas during his lifetime Bob Hope donated more than 1

billion dollars to hospitals, charities, and civic organizations;

Whereas Bob Hope received the Congressional Gold Medal in

1962, in recognition of his service to his country and the

cause of peace, and the Presidential Medal of Freedom

in 1969, in honor of his gifts of joy to all the American

people;

Whereas Bob Hope’s commitment to the Nation’s troops was

so great that he was the first person ever to be recog-
2

•HRES 357 EH

nized by the United States Congress as an honorary veteran;

Whereas Bob Hope received the Distinguished Service Medal

from each branch of the Armed Forces;

Whereas Bob Hope was awarded 5 special Oscars, the George

Peabody Award, and more than 50 honorary degrees; and

Whereas, on July 27, 2003, America was greatly saddened by

the death of Bob Hope: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) honors Bob Hope for his legendary career as an

entertainer, decades of dedicated service to the men and

women of the Armed Forces, and his many philanthropic

and humanitarian acts; and

(2) expresses condolences on his passing to his wife

Dolores, their children, and grandchildren.

Attest:

Clerk.
ACCEPTED 03-15-00440-CV 6143512 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/20/2015 4:33:39 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK CASENO. 03-15-00440-CV
IN THE COURT OFAPPEALS THIRD DISTRICT OFTEXAS AUSTIN,TEXAS

RAYMOND COX, JR., AND TAMESA COX, et al. Appellants,
v. GMAC MORTGAGE. LLC, Appellee. Appeal from the County Court at LawNumber Three Bell County, Texas (Case No. 74,283) APPELLEE'S NOTICE OFATTORNEYIN CHARGE

APPELLEE'S NOTICE OF ATIORNEY IN CHARGE Respectfully submitted,
By: Paul A. Hoefker Texas BarNo. 09772800 ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP* 550 Westcott, Suite 560 Houston, Texas 77007 713-293-3618 phone 858-412-2773 fax phoefker@aldridgepite.com *Pite Duncan, LLP, has changed is name to Aldridge Pite, LLP

### APPELLEE'S NOTICE OFATTORNEY IN CHARGE

TO THE HONRABLE COURT OF APPEALS: Attorney Paul 

### A. Hoefker hereby give his notice ofappearance in this matter as attorney for appellee, GMAC Mortgage, LLC, and notifies the Court thathe will be the attorney in charge for this client in this matter. Attorney Olga Panchenko has left the firm; therefore, Paul 

### A. Hoefker is now designated as the attorney in charge for GMAC Mortgage, LLC, in this appeal. Further, Pite Duncan, LLP, has changed its name to Aldridge Pite, LLP. Respectfully submitted,

# By~~ Texas BarNo. 09772800 ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP 550 Westcott, Suite 560 Houston, Texas 77007 713-293-3618 phone 858-412-2773 fax phoefker@aldridgepite.com ATTORNEY FORAPPELLEE


### CERTIFICATE OFSERVICE I hereby certifythat a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing document has been served in accordance withthe Rule 9.5 oftheTexas Rules ofAppellate Procedure on July 20, 2015, to: Michael Brinkley, Appellants' attorney, viafax at 888-511-0946.

Paul A. Hoefker

APPELLEE'S NOTICE OF ATIORNEY IN CHARGE
Director Compensation Summary Term Sheet



 Exhibit 10.39 
 Director Compensation Summary Term Sheet 
 During calendar year 2009, each non-employee member of the Board is
entitled to receive an aggregate of $60,000 in cash and stock. The cash portion of the compensation will be paid quarterly in $7,500 increments. The remainder of such compensation will be paid in shares of the Company’s Class A common
stock, and will be paid in January 2010 to individuals who are on the Board on December 31, 2009, subject to the approval by the Company’s shareholders of the Company’s Non-Employee Director Stock Plan at the 2009 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on May 5, 2009. 
 In addition to the foregoing, each non-employee director is entitled to receive $1,000 for each Board or
committee meeting attended. Further, the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Audit Committee are also entitled to receive a retainer of $3,000 per quarter, and the Chairman of each of the Executive and Nominating Committees is also
entitled to receive a retainer of $2,500 per quarter.
H. Res. 263

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 10, 2003.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2143) to prevent the use of certain bank instruments for unlawful Internet gambling, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial

Services. After general debate the bill shall be considered for

amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. No amendment to the bill shall be in order

except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules

accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the
2

•HRES 263 EH

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order

against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of

consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall

rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments

as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-4608

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES MONROE COX, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-03-28) Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 27, 2004 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank W. Dunham, Jr., Federal Public Defender, Larry W. Shelton, Supervisory Assistant Federal Public Defender, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Robert J. Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James Monroe Cox appeals the judgment order of the district court convicting him of threatening to assassinate the President of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 871 (2000). Finding no error, we affirm. Cox claims that he lacked the requisite intent to carry out his threat and that the threat was actually made as part of a deliberate attempt to remain incarcerated. Regardless of Cox’s motivation, when questioned by the Secret Service, he clearly expressed a present intent to harm the President if released from incarceration. See United States v. Patillo , 438 F.2d 13, 16 (4th Cir. 1971) (en banc). When the threat is considered in the context of Cox’s violent history, we cannot conclude that insufficient evidence supported Cox’s conviction. Accordingly, we affirm Cox’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argu ment would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED