alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                               [MEADEN&MOORE-LOGO]
                   ACCOUNTING, FINANCIAL BUSINESS CONSULTING





EXHIBIT 23.1 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-57477 on Form S-8 of our report on the consolidated financial statements and
report as to schedules included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Waxman
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the years ended June 30, 2002 and June 30,
2001.


/s/ Meaden & Moore, Ltd.
MEADEN & MOORE, LTD.
Certified Public Accountants

August 27, 2002
Cleveland, Ohio







                              [MEADEN&MOORE-LOGO]
          1100 SUPERIOR AVENUE  SUITE 1100  CLEVELAND, OHIO 44114-2523
                         216 241-3272  FAX 216 771-4511
      Akron  Charlotte  Chicago  Cleveland  Columbus  Naperville  New York
                          Orlando  Pittsburgh  Wooster
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36550-36551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17447]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Issue Committee will

[[Page 36551]]

be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, August 5, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marianne Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7978.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Issue Committee will be held Wednesday, August 5, 2009, at 
Noon, Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Marianne Ayala. For more information please contact Ms. 
Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978, or write TAP Office, 1000 
South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post 
comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 16, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-17447 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
KENNY INFORMATION SYSTEMS
  (A Division of J.J. Kenny Co., Inc.)
  November 24, 1997,
  PaineWebber Incorporated
  Unit Trust Department
  1200 Harbor Blvd.
  Weehawken, New Jersey 07087
  RE: THE MUNICIPAL BOND TRUST, SERIES 214
  Gentlemen:
  We have examined the post-effective Amendment to the Registration
  Statement File No. 33-19787 for the above-captioned trust. We
  hereby acknowledge that Kenny Information Systems, a division of
  J.J. Kenny Co., Inc. is currently acting as the evaluator for the trust.
  We hereby consent to the use in the Amendment of the reference to
  Kenny Information Systems, a division of J.J. Kenny Co. Inc., as
  evaluator.
  In addition, we hereby confirm that the ratings indicated in the
  above-referenced Amendment to the Registration Statement for the
  respective bonds comprising the trust portfolio are the ratings
  currently indicated in our KENNYBASE database.
  You are hereby authorized to file a copy of this letter with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission.
                              Sincerely,
                              /s/ JOHN R. FITZGERALD
                              John R. Fitzgerald
                              Senior Vice President
#### Randall Wayne GRIMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arron PFIEL, Correctional Officer; Armando H. Martinez, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-56055.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Jan. 3, 2013.

Randall Wayne Grimes, Represa, CA, pro se.

Jose Zelidon-Zepeda, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Randall Wayne Grimes appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force and deliberate indifference to safety. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Torres v. City of Los Angeles,*548 F.3d 1197, 1205 (9th Cir.2008) (judgment as a matter of law); *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th *702Cir.2004) (summary judgment). We affirm.

The district court properly granted judgment as a matter of law on Grimes’s excessive force claim because, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Grimes and drawing all inferences in his favor, the evidence at trial permitted only one reasonable conclusion — that defendants used reasonable force to regain control over Grimes during an escort. *See Clement v. Gomez,*298 F.3d 898, 903 (9th Cir.2002) (“Force does not amount to a constitutional violation ... if it is applied in a good faith effort to restore discipline and order and not ‘maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose of causing harm.’ ” (citation omitted)).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Grimes’s deliberate indifference claim because Grimes failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were aware of a risk to his safety from being double-celled with another inmate. *See Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (for deliberate indifference claim, “the official must both be aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the inference”).

Grimes’s remaining contentions, including that he had a constitutional right to be single-celled and that defendants’ alleged failure to follow various prison rules and regulations violated the Eighth Amendment, are not supported by the record and contrary to established law. *See Estate of Ford v. Ramirez-Palmer,*301 F.3d 1043, 1051-52 (9th Cir.2002) (there is no constitutional prohibition against double-celling and negligent failure to follow prison rules is not a constitutional violation).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-48-002]


Braintree Electric Light Department, Hingham Municipal Lighting 
Plant, Hull Municipal Lighting Plant, Mansfield Municipal Electric 
Department, Middleborough Gas & Electric Department, Taunton Municipal 
Light Plant v. ISO New England Inc.; Notice of Filing

July 22, 2009.
    Take notice that on July 17, 2009, the ISO New England, Inc. filed 
its Report of Compliance, pursuant to the Commission July 18, 2008 
Order, Braintree Light Dept., et al. v. ISO New England Inc., 124 FERC 
61,061 (2008) and section 1907 of the Commission's rule of Practice and 
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.1907 (2008).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcfaf9eefff3d2d0d5d2d9efc9ccccd3cec8fcdad9cedf92dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6f0f3e4f5f9d8dadfd8d3e5c3c6c6d9c4c2f6d0d3c4d598d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 7, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17988 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 125

Recognizing the thousands of Freemasons in every State in the Nation and 

honoring them for their many contributions to the Nation throughout 

its history. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2003

Mr. SMITH of Michigan (for himself, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. BARTLETT of 

Maryland, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. HOBSON, Mr. 

PETRI, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, and Mr. COLLINS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the thousands of Freemasons in every State 

in the Nation and honoring them for their many contributions to the Nation throughout its history.

Whereas Freemasons, whose long lineage extends back to before the Nation’s founding, have set an example of high 

moral standards and charity for all people; 

Whereas the Founding Fathers of this great Nation and signers of the Constitution, most of whom were Freemasons, 

provided a well-rounded basis for developing themselves 

and others into valuable citizens of the United States; 
2

•HRES 125 IH 

Whereas members of the Masonic Fraternity, both individually and as an organization, continue to make invaluable 

charitable contributions of service to the United States; 

Whereas the Masonic Fraternity continues to provide for the 

charitable relief and education of the citizens of the 

United States; 

Whereas the Masonic Fraternity is deserving of formal recognition of their long history of care-giving for the citizenry and their example of high moral standards; and 

Whereas Freemasons have always revered and celebrated St. 

John’s Day, June 24th, as dedicated to their patron 

saints: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the thousands of Freemasons in every State in the 

3 Nation and honors them for their many contributions to 

4 the Nation throughout its history.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 23, 2016

s1116 

# Order

Clerk November 23, 2016

152916

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152916

COA: 321200

Genesee CC: 13

- 032919

- FH

TMANDO ALLEN DENSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of June 22, 2016, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the

application for leave to appeal the October 1, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is

again considered. W e direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the

application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)( 1). We further ORDER the Genesee

Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003

- 03, to determine whether

the defendant is indigent, and if so, to appoint Jonathan B.D. Simon, if feasible, to

represent the defendant in this Court. If this app ointment is not feasible, the trial court

shall, within the same time frame, appoint other counsel to represent the defendant in this

Court. The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days following the

appointment of counsel addressing: (1) wh ether the trial court erred when it admitted

evidence under MRE 404(b) of the circumstances underlying defendant’s 2002

conviction for assault with intent to do great bodily harm and, if so, (2) whether the error

was harmless. The parties should not submi t mere restatements of their application

papers.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                CERTIFICATION OF
                         PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                            VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC.


     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
(the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 of Valence Technology,
Inc. (the "Issuer").

     I, Stephan B. Godevais, the Principal Executive Officer of the Issuer,
certify that to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated:  February 9, 2005
                                                      /s/ Stephan B. Godevais
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Name:  Stephan B. Godevais




<PAGE>



                                CERTIFICATION OF
                         PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                            VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC.


     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
(the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 of Valence Technology,
Inc. (the "Issuer").

     I, Kevin W. Mischnick, the Principal Financial Officer of the Issuer,
certify that to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated:  February 9, 2005

                                                      /s/ Kevin W. Mischnick
                                                      --------------------------
                                                       Name:  Kevin W. Mischnick
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 FOR ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES, INC.
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS 3NET SYSTEMS, INC.) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,264
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  248,226
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               327,374
<PP&E>                                         568,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                 555,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 340,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,431,345
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,225,002
<COMMON>                                       254,901
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,407,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   340,953
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,584,634
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,401,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (14,759)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             182,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (801,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (801,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (801,892)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 234 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 234

    Condemning bigotry and violence against Arab-Americans, Muslim-
         Americans, South Asian-Americans, and Sikh-Americans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2003

    Mr. Issa (for himself, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Conyers, Mr. 
Dingell, Mr. Rahall, and Mr. Honda) submitted the following resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Condemning bigotry and violence against Arab-Americans, Muslim-
         Americans, South Asian-Americans, and Sikh-Americans.

Whereas all Americans are united in supporting American men and women who 
        protect our Nation abroad and at home;
Whereas thousands of Arab-Americans, Muslim-Americans, South Asian-Americans, 
        and Sikh-Americans serve in the military and in law enforcement, working 
        to protect all Americans;
Whereas the Arab-American, Muslim-American, South Asian-American, and Sikh-
        American communities are vibrant, peaceful, and law-abiding, and have 
        greatly contributed to American society; and
Whereas all Americans, including Arab-Americans, Muslim-Americans, South Asian-
        Americans, and Sikh-Americans, condemn acts of violence and prejudice: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) is concerned by the number of bias-motivated crimes 
        against Arab-Americans, Muslim-Americans, South Asian-
        Americans, and Sikh-Americans, and other Americans in recent 
        months;
            (2) declares that the civil rights and civil liberties of 
        all Americans, including Arab-Americans, Muslim-Americans, 
        South Asian-Americans, and Sikh-Americans, should be protected;
            (3) condemns bigotry and acts of violence against any 
        American, including Arab-Americans, Muslim-Americans, South 
        Asian-Americans, and Sikh-Americans;
            (4) calls upon local, State, and Federal law enforcement 
        authorities to work to prevent bias-motivated crimes against 
        all Americans, including Arab-Americans, Muslim-Americans, 
        South Asian-Americans, and Sikh-Americans; and
            (5) calls upon local, State, and Federal law enforcement 
        authorities to investigate and prosecute vigorously all such 
        crimes committed against Arab-Americans, Muslim-Americans, 
        South Asian-Americans, and Sikh-Americans.
                                 <all>
```
No. 1121.

#### Spencer *v.*New York.

May 20, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York, New York, denied.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The Registrant has the following wholly-owned subsidiaries which, except as indicated, do business under their respective legal names:



|                                                                    |  |                           
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Name                                                                |  | Place of Incorporation    
|WD-40 Manufacturing Company                                         |  | California, USA           
|                                                                    | 
|WD-40 Company (Canada) Ltd.                                         |  | Ontario, Canada           
|                                                                    | 
|WD-40 Holdings Limited                                              |  | London, England           
|                                                                    | 
|WD-40 Company Limited                                               |  | London, England           
|                                                                    | 
|WD-40 Company (Australia) Pty. Limited                              |  | New South Wales, Australia
|                                                                    | 
|HPD Holdings Corp.                                                  |  | Delaware, USA             
|                                                                    | 
|HPD Laboratories, Inc.,
(doing business as Global Household Brands) |  | Delaware, USA             
|                                                                    | 
|HPD Properties, LLC                                                 |  | Delaware, USA             
|                                                                    | 
|Heartland Corporation                                               |  | Kansas, USA               
|                                                                    | 
|Shanghai Wu Di Trading Company Limited                              |  | Shanghai, China           
|                                                                    | 
|WD-40 Direct, LLC                                                   |  | Delaware, USA
# msd_CD_R2_00_2019