alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 16

Commending the people and government of Kenya for the recent free elections 

and the orderly and democratic transfer of power. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION

Commending the people and government of Kenya for the 

recent free elections and the orderly and democratic 

transfer of power.

Whereas Mr. Mwai Kibaki recently took the oath of office as 

Kenya’s third president; 

Whereas President Daniel Moi peacefully transferred power 

after 24 years in office; 

Whereas the election of the new president was supported by 

63 percent of the voters, reflecting the decided will of the 

people; 

Whereas in spite of unseasonably heavy rains, the elections 

for president, parliament, and more that 2,000 local 

councilors were described by local and international ob-
2

•HRES 16 IH 

servers as the most free and fair in Kenya’s 39-year history as an independent nation; 

Whereas the presidents of Uganda, Tanzania, and Zambia, as 

well as the prime minister of Rwanda and the wife of 

South African President Thabo Mbeki, in a strong show 

of solidarity by the people and countries in the region, 

with the newly elected government, witnessed the swearing-in ceremony of President Kibaki; and 

Whereas the recent elections represent an example for other 

countries in the region: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) commends the people of Kenya and its 

3 newly elected president, members of parliament, and 

4 local councilors for their extraordinary conduct in 

5 the practice of and commitment to the principles of 

6 free elections and a democratic form of government; 

7 (2) expresses full support for the new govern8 ment of Kenya as it begins the difficult transition to 

9 new leadership and addresses the issues of the econ10 omy and raised expectations of its citizens for a gov11 ernment more responsive the the needs of its people; 

12 (3) urges patience on the part of the people of 

13 Kenya as the new government confronts the chal14 lenges that lay ahead; and 

15 (4) urges the President of the United States to 

16 look with favor upon requests for assistance that 

17 may be presented to the United States by the new 
3

•HRES 16 IH 

1 government of Kenya, as it moves forward to ad2 dress the many concerns of the people of this most 

3 important African country.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 982 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 982

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations issued by 
                   the Government of American Samoa.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 982

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations issued by 
                   the Government of American Samoa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TAX TREATMENT OF BONDS AND OTHER 
              OBLIGATIONS ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT OF AMERICAN SAMOA.

    (a) Exemption of All Bonds From Income Taxation by State and Local 
Governments.--Subsection (b) of section 202 of Public Law 98-454 (48 
U.S.C. 1670) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Exemption of All Bonds From Income Taxation by State and 
Local Governments.--
            ``(1) In general.--The interest on any bond or other 
        obligation issued by or on behalf of the Government of American 
        Samoa shall be exempt from taxation by the Government of 
        American Samoa and the governments of any of the several 
        States, the District of Columbia, any territory or possession 
        of the United States, and any subdivision thereof.
            ``(2) Exemption applicable only to income taxes.--The 
        exemption provided by paragraph (1) shall not apply to gift, 
        estate, inheritance, legacy, succession, or other wealth 
        transfer taxes.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall apply to obligations issued after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 4, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 106

Congratulating Lutheran schools, students, parents, teachers, administrators, 

and congregations across the Nation for their ongoing contributions 

to education, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2003

Mr. BEREUTER (for himself, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. NUSSLE, and Mr. PETERSON

of Minnesota) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION

Congratulating Lutheran schools, students, parents, teachers, 

administrators, and congregations across the Nation for 

their ongoing contributions to education, and for other 

purposes.

Whereas the Nation’s Lutheran schools deliver high-quality 

education and challenge students to reach their potential; 

Whereas there are 4,841 Lutheran early childhood centers, 

elementary schools, and secondary schools in the United 

States served by 40,076 teachers; 

Whereas the Nation’s total Lutheran school student enrollment is 572,877; 

Whereas Lutheran schools produce students strongly dedicated to their faith, values, and morals by providing an 
2

•HRES 106 IH 

environment that encourages honesty, trust, respect, and 

responsibility; and 

Whereas the week beginning on March 2, 2003, has been established as National Lutheran Schools Week for the 

purpose of recognizing the vital contributions of the Nation’s Lutheran early childhood education centers, elementary schools, and secondary schools: Now, therefore, 

be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) supports the goals of National Lutheran 

3 Schools Week, which is celebrated by several synods 

4 that have educational institutions, for the purpose of 

5 recognizing their academic achievement; and 

6 (2) congratulates Lutheran schools, students, 

7 parents, teachers, administrators, and congregations 

8 across the Nation for their ongoing contributions to 

9 education.

Æ
#### COLDEN v. R. J. SCHOFIELD MOTORS et al.

Civ. No. 28760.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio.

April 22, 1952.

M. C. Harrison, Craig Spangenberg, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Edward D. Crocker, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant Kaiser-Frazer Corp.

Frank X. Cull, Cleveland, Ohio, for other defendants.

JONES, Chief Judge.

Defendant Kaiser-Frazer Corporation, by interrogatory, requests production of a statement or report made in writing by plaintiff’s expert and taken by her attorney. Plaintiff is willing to treat the request as a motion for production of the statement. She objects to the request, how*522ever, on the ground that the statement is part of the “work product” of one of the plaintiff’s attorneys and is therefore privileged against discovery under Rules 33 or 34, 28 U.S.C.A., relying on Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S.Ct. 385, 91 L. Ed. 451.

Since the decision in Hickman v. Taylor, supra, makes it clear that the statement of plaintiff’s expert here does not fall within the attorney-client privilege, it remains to be determined only here whether the statement is privileged against discovery as the “work product” of plaintiff’s attorney.

Among other things, the principles of the decision in Hickman v. Taylor, supra, extend to disclosures in rare situations having exceptional features which make the disclosures necessary in the interest of justice and where the party seeking discovery is not otherwise able effectively to secure the information. It seems to me the present situation is one calling for the application of such principle. Due to the disassembly of the automobile involved for the purpose of making the inspection and examination upon which the expert’s statement was based, defendant is not now in position to obtain the information elsewhere. Possibly the information might be secured by taking the deposition of the plaintiff’s expert, but in the interest of time and the expedition of the litigation I think the objection to the defendant’s request should be denied and the statement, or a true copy thereof, be produced and furnished the defendant.

It is so ordered.
**Exhibit 4(i)**

 

Notice Requirement Relating to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 

The Board of Directors has adopted the following requirement which is applicable to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholdersof the Company. Any shareholder that intends to propose a nomination of a director candidate or otherwise submit any proposal relating to the composition of the Board of Directors for consideration at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders must notifythe Corporate Secretary of such nomination or proposal in writing by no later than the close of business on March 17, 2006 in order to be considered timely and appropriate for consideration by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting. The noticeshould contain all information concerning any such nominee that would be required to be included in a proxy statement relating to any solicitation of proxies with respect to such nominee by the shareholder and the text of any such proposal; the nameand address, as they appear in the Company’s books, of the shareholder; the number of common shares of the Company that are beneficially owned by the shareholder; and any material interest of the shareholder in such business. Written noticemust be sent to: Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 256, Dublin, Ohio 43017-0256. No matter will be submitted to vote at the Annual Meeting if written notice has not been given to the Corporate Secretary by such date. No other business other than thatset forth in the formal notice of the meeting shall be considered timely for consideration at the 2006 Annual Meeting.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. DAVID M. MEADIUS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 607 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 2nd day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 28, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 37176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17918]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 571

[Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0116]
RIN 2127-AK35


Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Door Locks and Door 
Retention Components, Correction

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA published in the Federal Register of July 20, 2009, a 
document delaying the compliance date of the sliding door provisions of 
a February 6, 2007 final rule. The regulatory text adopted by that 
document contained errors. This document corrects those errors.

DATES: Effective on September 1, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sarah Alves, NHTSA Office of the 
Chief Counsel, DOT, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
telephone (202) 366-2992, fax (202) 366-3820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    NHTSA published in the Federal Register of July 20, 2009 (74 FR 
35131), a document delaying the compliance date of the sliding door 
provisions of a February 6, 2007 final rule (FR Doc. E9-17078). In the 
regulatory text adopted by that document, in S4.2.2.3, a statement 
erroneously reads: ``This S4.2.2.3 applies to vehicle manufactured on 
or after September 1, 2010.'' The statement should read: ``This S4.2.2 
applies to vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2010.'' This 
document corrects that error.

Correction of Publication

    In rule FR Doc. E9-17078 published on July 20, 2009 (74 FR 35131), 
make the following correction. On page 35135, in the third column, 
S4.2.2.3 is corrected to read as follows:
    S4.2.2.3 This S4.2.2 applies to vehicles manufactured on or after 
September 1, 2010.

    Issued: July 23, 2009.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E9-17918 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
Exhibit 13.1

Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies
as follows:



|1. | I, James Blake, am the Chief Executive Officer of Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation (the Corporation).
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge:
|-- | ----------------



| | (A) | The Corporations Form 20-F accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: July 14, 2006



/s/ James BlakeName:

James BlakeTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO KOWLOON-CANTON RAILWAY CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY KOWLOON-CANTON RAILWAY CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ekere INYANGETTE, a/k/a Michael Thomas, a/k/a Uduak Inyangette, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7604.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 18, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2012.

Ekere Inyangette, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lamont Creighton, Office of the United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, Dennis Michael Fitzpatrick, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ekere Inyangette seeks to appeal his conviction and 132-month sentence following his guilty plea to one count of possession with intent to distribute five grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2006). We dismiss the appeal.

In criminal cases, a defendant must file his notice of appeal within fourteen days after the entry of judgment.1 Fed. R.App. *311P. 4(b)(1)(A)®. With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); *United States v. Reyes,*759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered the criminal judgment on October 26, 2009. Inyangette filed his notice of appeal on September 13, 2012.2 Because Inyangette failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

1

. At the time judgment was entered, the appeal period was ten days. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(l)(A)(i) (2008). On December 1, 2009, the period was extended to fourteen days. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(l)(A)(i) (2009). Inyan-gette’s notice of appeal is untimely under either period.

2

. For purposes of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the district court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston*v. *Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).

3

. We note that the appeal period in a criminal case is not a jurisdictional provision, but rather a claim-processing rule. *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 209-14, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007); *United States v. Urutyan,*564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir.2009). However, because Inyangette’s appeal is inordinately late, and its consideration is not in the best interest of judicial economy, we exercise our inherent power to dismiss it. *United States v. Mitchell,*518 F.3d 740, 744, 750 (10th Cir.2008).
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-02845, 333-42445, 333-42447, 333-44922, 333-47277, and 333-61128 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 13, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule of Wausau Paper Corp. and subsidiaries (the Company), and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting (which report on the Companys consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Companys adoption of the recognition provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers Accounting for Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans(SFAS 158),on December 31, 2006, the measurement date provision of SFAS 158 on January 1, 2008, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Milwaukee, WI

March 13, 2009
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), John E.
Baker, as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August
11, 2008











/s/
John E. Baker


John E.
Baker


Senior
Vice President &


Chief
Financial Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0454]

# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Food Contact Substances Notification System” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information Management (HFA-710),Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of December 4, 2008 (73 FR 73936), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0495. The approval expires on May 31, 2012. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: July 15, 2009.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E9-17332 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
# Productivity and Costs Latest Numbers

Latest Numbers for Productivity and Costs, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

- Productivity and Costs Latest Numbers NONFARM BUSINESS SECTOR:															           Labor productivity (output per hour)					+0.3%  in 1st Qtr of 2024					Historical Data								           Hourly compensation					+5.0%  in 1st Qtr of 2024					Historical Data								           Unit labor costs					+4.7%  in 1st Qtr of 2024					Historical Data								           Real value-added output					+1.3%  in 1st Qtr of 2024					Historical Data								           Hours worked					+1.0%  in 1st Qtr of 2024					Historical Data																		MANUFACTURING SECTOR:															           Labor productivity (output per hour)					+0.2%  in 1st Qtr of 2024					Historical Data								           Hourly compensation					+3.4%  in 1st Qtr of 2024					Historical Data								           Unit labor costs					+3.2%  in 1st Qtr of 2024					Historical Data								           Real sectoral output					unchanged  in 1st Qtr of 2024					Historical Data								           Hours worked					-0.2%  in 1st Qtr of 2024					Historical Data