alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                         PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                            VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the quarter ended June 30, 2005, of Valence Technology, Inc. (the "Issuer").

     I, Kevin W. Mischnick, the Principal Financial Officer of the Issuer,
     certify that to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.


Dated:  August 9, 2005                          /s/ Kevin W. Mischnick
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Kevin W. Mischnick


                                       46
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Great Lakes Dredge & DockCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Deborah A. Wensel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ Deborah A. Wensel               |   |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Deborah A. Wensel                   |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer             |   |   |
| Date:   November 14, 2006 |   |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation and will beretained by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

1

----
No. 1098.

#### Oklahoma *v.*United States Civil Service Commission.

May 27, 1946.

*Mac Q. Williamson,*Attorney General of Oklahoma, and *Randell S. Cobh,*First Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.

*Solicitor General McGrath*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 26 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 26

            Honoring the contributions of Catholic schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2003

 Mr. Vitter submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Honoring the contributions of Catholic schools.

Whereas America's Catholic schools are internationally acclaimed for their 
        academic excellence, but provide students more than a superior 
        scholastic education;
Whereas Catholic schools ensure a broad, values-added education emphasizing the 
        lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values 
        in America's young people;
Whereas the total Catholic school student enrollment for the 2000-2001 academic 
        year was 2,616,330, and the student-teacher ratio is 17 to 1;
Whereas Catholic schools teach a diverse group of students;
Whereas more than 26 percent of school children enrolled in Catholic schools are 
        minorities, and more than 13 percent are Non-Catholics;
Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated to their faith, 
        values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually 
        stimulating environment rich in spiritual, character, and moral 
        development; and
Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic education, the National 
        Conference of Catholic Bishops stated, ``Education is one of the most 
        important ways by which the Church fulfills its commitment to the 
        dignity of the person and building of community. Community is central to 
        education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently 
        desired goal. The educational efforts of the Church, therefore, must be 
        directed to forming persons-in-community; for the education of the 
        individual Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny, but 
        also the destinies of the many communities in which he lives'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals of Catholic Schools Week, an event 
        co-sponsored by the National Catholic Educational Association 
        and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and 
        established to recognize the vital contributions of America's 
        thousands of Catholic elementary and secondary schools; and
            (2) congratulates Catholic schools, students, parents, and 
        teachers across the Nation for their ongoing contributions to 
        education, and for the key role they play in promoting and 
        ensuring a brighter, stronger future for this Nation.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-131

_____________________________

HANNAH YVONNE SPRINGER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

William E. Davis, Judge.

September 23, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, C.J., and B.L. THOMAS and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
[No. 55497-2-I.

Division One.

November 14, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Todd Grant Hawley, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Whatcom County, No. 04-1-00725-1, Ira Uhrig, J., entered November 30, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
DISMISS and DENY; and Opinion Filed December 18, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-01529-CV

No. 05-15-01530-CV

No. 05-15-01531-CV

IN RE ANDREW PETE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-33559-V, F12-33560-V, F12-33561-V

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Fillmore, and Brown

Opinion by Justice Brown

In this petition for writ of mandamus relator contends that the trial court erred when, after 

granting his motion for mistrial, it ordered a new trial as to punishment only. Relator requests 

that the Court order the trial court to vacate the jury verdicts in his criminal cases, reinstate his 

bond, release him from custody, and proceed with a new trial on his guilt or innocence of the 

offenses with which he was charged. As an initial matter, we note that this Court has no original 

habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal proceedings. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 

2004). Thus, we may not grant relief that requires relator’s release from custody. We also may 

not grant the other forms of relief relator seeks. Mandamus relief is appropriate in a criminal 

case only when a relator establishes (1) that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress the

alleged harm, and (2) that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act, not a discretionary or 
–2–

judicial decision. In re Allen, 462 S.W.3d 47, 49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015) (orig. proceeding). 

Relator has not met these requirements. 

We dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction to the extent it seeks relator’s 

release from custody. We deny the balance of the petition.

151529F.P05

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 37642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Parts 202 and 252


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical 
Amendments

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making technical amendments to the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to update the list of Air 
Force contracting activities and paragraph numbering.

DATES: Effective Date: July 29, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Michele Peterson, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), IMD 3D139, 
3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone 703-602-
0311; facsimile 703-602-7887.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends DFARS text as 
follows:
    [cir] 202.101. Updates the list of Air Force contracting 
activities.
    [cir] 252.225-7036. Updates a paragraph designation in Alternate I 
for consistency with the corresponding paragraph in the basic clause.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 202 and 252

    Government procurement.

Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

0
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 202 and 252 are amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 202 and 252 continues to 
read as follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.

PART 202--DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

0
2. Section 202.101 is amended in the definition of ``Contracting 
activity'' by revising the list with the heading ``AIR FORCE'' to read 
as follows:


202.101  Definitions.

* * * * *
    Contracting activity * * *
AIR FORCE
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Acquisition)
Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Contracting)
Air Force Materiel Command
Air Force Reserve Command
Air Combat Command
Air Mobility Command
Air Education and Training Command
Pacific Air Forces
United States Air Forces in Europe
Air Force Space Command
Air Force District of Washington
Air Force Operational Test & Evaluation Center
Air Force Special Operations Command
United States Air Force Academy
Aeronautical Systems Center
Air Armament Center
Electronic Systems Center
Space and Missile Systems Center
* * * * *

PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES


252.225-7036  [Amended]

0
3. Section 252.225-7036 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising the Alternate I date to read ``(JUL 2009)'';
0
b. In Alternate I introductory text by removing ``(a)(4) and (c) for 
paragraphs (a)(4)'' and adding in its place ``(a)(8) and (c) for 
paragraphs (a)(8)''; and
0
c. In Alternate I by redesignating paragraph (a)(4) as paragraph 
(a)(8).

[FR Doc. E9-17948 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P
#### Tommie DAWSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WELLS FARGO CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-3400.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 7, 2013.

Filed: March 13, 2013.

Tommie Dawson, Savage, MN, pro se.

Patrick Robert Martin, Jody A. Ward-Rannow, Ogletree & Deakins, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Tommie Dawson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil complaint. After careful review, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. Dawson’s Title VII claim was untimely, and there was no basis for tolling the time limits. *See*42 U.S.C. § 2000e—5(f)(1) (civil action may be brought within 90 days of right-to-sue notice). Dawson also failed to state a fraud claim, because he did not allege that *he*acted in reliance on any false representation. *See Northstar Indus., Inc. v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 576 F.3d 827,*832 (8th Cir.2009) (to establish fraud under Minnesota law, plaintiff must show, inter alia, that false representation by party caused other *party*to act in reliance thereon). Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
H. Res. 253

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 23 (legislative day, May 22), 2003.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 2) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 201 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal

year 2004. All points of order against the conference report

and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read. The previous question shall

be considered as ordered on the conference report to final

adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of

debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and

Means; and (2) one motion to recommit. The yeas and nays

shall be considered as ordered on the question of adoption of
2

•HRES 253 EH

the conference report. Clause 5(b) of rule XXI shall not apply

to the conference report.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1







Certification

of

Wausau Paper Corp.

under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wausau Paper Corp. (the Company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



| |                      |  |                                  
| | -------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
| | Date:  March 1, 2010 |  |                                  
| |                      |  |                                  
| |                      |  | THOMAS J. HOWATT                 
| |                      |  | Thomas J. Howatt                 
| |                      |  | President and CEO                
| |                      |  |                                  
| |                      |  |                                  
| |                      |  | SCOTT P. DOESCHER                
| |                      |  | Scott P. Doescher                
| |                      |  | Executive Vice President, Finance
| |                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer)    





This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Wausau Paper Corp. for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 27
                           WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEETS AND RELATED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF
EARNINGS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000
        
<S>                                   <C>                
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             27,600
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     311,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                        4,571
<INVENTORY>                                       394,595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  766,188
<PP&E>                                          5,981,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,018,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,811,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             458,095
<BONDS>                                         1,916,001
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           55,675
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,938,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,811,055
<SALES>                                         3,438,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,438,664
<CGS>                                           2,967,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,967,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  243,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                116,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   111,263
<INCOME-TAX>                                       38,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                72,963
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       72,963
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.65
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 348 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 348

   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives to raise the 
                     awareness of alopecia areata.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2003

  Mr. Ryan of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Towns, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Ross, Mr. 
  Hinchey, Ms. Woolsey, and Mrs. Christensen) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives to raise the 
                     awareness of alopecia areata.

Whereas alopecia areata is a common autoimmune skin disease resulting in the 
        loss of hair on the scalp and elsewhere on the body;
Whereas alopecia areata is a common but very challenging and capricious disease 
        affecting approximately 2 percent of the American population, amounting 
        to more than 4.7 million people in the United States;
Whereas, with alopecia areata, the affected hair follicles are mistakenly 
        attacked by a person's immune system, resulting in the loss of hair;
Whereas, although not life-threatening, alopecia areata is most certainly life-
        altering, and its sudden onset, recurrent episodes, and unpredictable 
        course have a serious effect on a person's life and functional status at 
        work, school, and everyday life; and
Whereas because much of the public is not familiar with alopecia areata, the 
        reaction of the public to the disease can have a profound psychological 
        impact on the lives of those disrupted by this disease: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
an appropriate week should be designated as National Alopecia Areata 
Awareness Week.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-02-0053-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	APRIL 4, 2002

	______________________________

	BETTY ANN NEWBY, 

								Appellant

	v.

	TISDALE SIDING, INC.

								Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY;

	NO. 5682; HON. JACK WORSHAM, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

	Appellant Betty Ann Newby, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment dated October 7, 2001.  Both the clerk’s record and reporter’s record have been filed.  Appellant’s brief was originally due March 4, 2002, which date came and went without a brief or extension being filed.  The Court notified appellant on March 14, 2002, 

that the brief was past due and that failure to reasonably explain the reasons therefor could result in dismissal.  On March 15, 2002, a motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed and appellant was granted an extension until March 29, 2002. So too was she admonished that no further extensions would be granted without extreme and unusual circumstances.  The March 29, 2002 deadline has passed without appellant filing either a brief or a further motion to extend the deadline.

	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b) and (c).

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 
 ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. 
 Description of Outside Director
Compensation Program 
 The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“ACADIA”) has approved the
following fees that are payable to the non-management directors who are members of the Board, effective June 1, 2013: 
  

			
	 Annual
Retainer
	  	$35,000
	 Additional Retainer for Board Chair
	  	$22,500
	 Additional Retainer for Audit Chair
	  	$18,000
	 Additional Retainer for Audit Member (non-Chair)
	  	$9,000
	 Additional Retainer for Compensation Chair
	  	$14,000
	 Additional Retainer for Compensation
Member (non-Chair)
	  	$7,000
	 Additional Retainer for Nominating and Corporate Governance
Chair
	  	$10,000
	 Additional Retainer for Nominating and Corporate Governance Member
(non-Chair)
	  	$5,000
	
Options
	  	15,000 upon joining Board
	 	  	12,500 annual grant thereafter
	 	  	1,500 additional annual grant for Board
Chair

 The Annual Retainer amounts are payable following the first meeting of the Board that follows the annual meeting of
ACADIA’s stockholders. Annual option grants to directors are made at the Board meeting following the annual meeting of stockholders in accordance with the provisions of stock option plans that have been approved by ACADIA’s stockholders.
The annual retainer amount and annual option grant may be pro rated for a director that joins the Board other than at the first meeting of the Board following the annual meeting of stockholders. 

  
 1