alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**(Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), John E.
      Baker, as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 12, 2005











/s/
      John E. Baker


John
      E.
      Baker


Senior
      Vice President &


Chief
      Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 1, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-796

Lower Tribunal No. 96-38947

________________



### Givanni Parks

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina

Miranda

, Judge.

Givanni Parks, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and SCALES, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

Givanni Parks appeals from the trial court’s denial of a post-conviction

petition styled as a petition for habeas corpus. We conclude that the trial courtproperly denied the appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus as it consisted

solely of arguments made by him in prior unsuccessful post-conviction motions.

Appellant raises two arguments: that his sentence is illegal and he did not violate

his plea agreement. This Court has previously reviewed and dismissed those

arguments. See Parks v. State

, 863 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). As such, we

consider this petition as if filed as a 3.850 motion. We therefore affirm the trial

court’s denial of Park’s petition as successive.

Affirmed.

2
No. 514,

October Term, 1944.

#### Robinson *v.*United States.

May 13, 1946.

The motion for leave to file a third petition for rehearing is denied.

Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

325 U. S. 895.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 990 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 990

To amend title 18 of the United States Code to provide for reciprocity 
  in regard to the manner in which nonresidents of a State may carry 
               certain concealed firearms in that State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2003

    Mr. Hostettler (for himself, Mr. Hayworth, Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of 
 Virginia, Mr. Crane, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Otter, Mr. Gibbons, 
Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Ney, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Goode, Mr. Boucher, Mr. 
  Souder, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Hall, Mr. 
Aderholt, Mr. English, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mrs. Musgrave, Mr. Pence, 
and Mr. Bradley of New Hampshire) introduced the following bill; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18 of the United States Code to provide for reciprocity 
  in regard to the manner in which nonresidents of a State may carry 
               certain concealed firearms in that State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secure Access to Firearms 
Enhancement (SAFE) Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. RECIPROCITY FOR THE CARRYING OF CERTAIN CONCEALED FIREARMS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 926A the following:
``Sec. 926B. Reciprocity for the carrying of certain concealed firearms
    ``Notwithstanding any provision of the law of any State or 
political subdivision thereof, a person who is not prohibited by 
Federal law from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a 
firearm, and is--
            ``(1) carrying a valid license or permit which is issued 
        pursuant to the law of any State and which permits the person 
        to carry a concealed firearm; or
            ``(2) otherwise entitled to carry a concealed firearm in 
        and pursuant to the law of the State of the person's residence,
may carry in any State a concealed firearm in accordance with the terms 
of the license or with the laws of the State of the person's residence, 
subject to the laws of the State in which the firearm is carried 
concerning specific types of locations in which firearms may not be 
carried.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 44 of 
title 18 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
926A the following:

``926B. Reciprocity for the carrying of certain concealed firearms.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The provisions of this Act and the amendments made by this Act 
shall take effect 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Focus Enhancements, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Brett Moyer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.
| /s/Brett A. Moyer       |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                    |
| Brett A. Moyer          |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November 14, 2006       |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Watsco, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 14, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Watsco, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and for each of the two years in the
period ended December 31, 2004, included in the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders of Watsco, Inc. and subsidiaries.

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements:



|(1) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-7758, No.33-37982, No. 333-00371, No. 333-01441 and No. 333-19803) of Watsco, Inc. and subsidiaries,
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-10363, No. 333-80341, No. 333-39380 and No. 333-126824) pertaining to the Watsco, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1996
Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-82011, No. 33-51934 and No. 33-72798) pertaining to the Watsco, Inc. Amended and Restated 1991 Stock Option Plan, and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-86006) pertaining to the 2001 Incentive Compensation Plan;
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 14, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Watsco Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and for each of the two years in the period ended
December 31, 2004, incorporated herein by reference, and our report with respect to the financial statement schedule of Watsco, Inc. and subsidiaries for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004, included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Watsco, Inc. and subsidiaries.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Certified Public Accountants

Miami, Florida

March 13, 2006
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted May 9, 2013

Decided May 9, 2013

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 12-3396

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

HUGH L. McGOWAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

No. 12-CR-39

William C. Griesbach,

Chief Judge.

O R D E R

Hugh McGowan trafficked cocaine from Chicago for sale to buyers in Wisconsin’s

Fox River Valley. Drug Enforcement Administration agents made 45 controlled buys from

dealers in the region, many of whom had ties to McGowan, and the agents arrested

McGowan after executing a search warrant on his house. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy

to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine, and possession of crack

cocaine with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). McGowan’s plea agreement included

a waiver of his right to appeal any sentence below the statutory maximum that did not

result from ineffective assistance of counsel or consideration of constitutionally

impermissible factors. The district court imposed 180 months’ imprisonment and 5 years’

supervised release. McGowan filed a notice of appeal, but his appellate counsel has

concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw under Anders v. California,

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 12-3396 Page 2

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). McGowan has not responded to counsel’s submission. See CIR. R.

51(b). We review only the potential issues identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief.

See United States v. Schuh, 289 F.3d 968, 973–74 (7th Cir. 2002).

McGowan has told counsel that he does not want his guilty plea set aside, so

counsel properly omits from his Anders submission any discussion about the adequacy of

the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the plea. See United States v. Konczak, 683 F.3d 348,

349 (7th Cir. 2012); United States v. Knox, 287 F.3d 667, 670–72 (7th Cir. 2002). It follows, says

counsel, that McGowan’s appeal waiver makes this appeal frivolous. We agree with

counsel; because an appeal waiver stands or falls with the guilty plea, United States v. Zitt,

Nos. 12-1277, 12-2865, 2013 WL 1501956, at *4 (7th Cir. Apr. 15, 2013); United States v.

Sakellarion, 649 F.3d 634, 639 (7th Cir. 2011), McGowan’s waiver must be enforced.

Moreover, no element of his sentence exceeds a statutory maximum, see 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(b)(1)(A)(iii), (b)(1)(B)(iii), and the court did not rely on any unconstitutional factor

when imposing McGowan’s sentence.

The motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 159

Expressing profound sorrow on the occasion of the death of Irma Rangel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2003

Mr. HINOJOSA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Expressing profound sorrow on the occasion of the death 

of Irma Rangel.

Whereas Irma Rangel, in 1977, became the first MexicanAmerican woman ever elected to the Texas House of Representatives; 

Whereas Irma Rangel served the great State of Texas and 

the people of Kingsville with honor and distinction for 26 

years as a Member of the Texas House of Representatives; 

Whereas Irma Rangel was Chairwoman of the Texas House 

of Representatives Committee on Higher Education and 

was a tireless advocate of educational opportunities for 

all students; 

Whereas Irma Rangel recognized the value of higher education for all young people of Texas and introduced the 
2

•HRES 159 IH 

10 percent rule legislation that entitled all highly motivated and successful Texas high school students who 

graduated in the top 10 percent of their high school class 

to be admitted into Texas institutions of higher education, marking a shift in college admissions; 

Whereas Irma Rangel recognized the importance of creating 

a professional school of pharmacy in South Texas and 

worked diligently to realize that vision; 

Whereas Irma Rangel was a staunch supporter of Texas 

Grant 1 and Texas Grant 2, which provided tuition and 

fees for students who graduated under the recommended 

plan and extended those opportunities to community college students; 

Whereas Irma Rangel dedicated her life to make Texas better 

for all its citizenry, improve the quality of life for the 

people she served, and especially expand educational opportunities for the young people of Texas; 

Whereas the life and legacy of Irma Rangel serve as an inspiration for the young people of Texas and for the poor 

and powerless for whom she fought so passionately; 

Whereas Irma Rangel was a role model for young Hispanic 

female students in achieving success; 

Whereas Irma Rangel placed high value on self-empowerment, which enabled individuals to access opportunities to 

achieve their goals; and 

Whereas Irma Rangel will forever be remembered for her signature phrase, ‘‘Will this hurt or help?’’ when addressing 

pending legislation before the Texas House of Representatives: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
3

•HRES 159 IH 

1 (1) has learned with profound sorrow of the 

2 death of Irma Rangel on March 18, 2003, and ex3 tends condolences to her family; 

4 (2) expresses its deep gratitude to Irma Rangel 

5 and her family for the service that she rendered to 

6 the State of Texas; 

7 (3) recognizes with appreciation and respect 

8 Irma Rangel’s exemplary commitment to public serv9 ice and her constituents; and 

10 (4) esteems Irma Rangel as a role model for 

11 generations to come in South Texas and the entire 

12 Nation.

Æ
#### Malvin OLSEN, Plaintiff, v. DALZELLIDO, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Feb. 27, 1959.

Cantor & Opper, New York City, for plaintiff.

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

I decline to sign the annexed ex parte order sought by the plaintiff for leave to serve interrogatories upon the defendant within ten days after the commencement of the within action.

Rule 33 should be read in conjunction with Rule 26. 4 Moore’s Fed. Prac. (2d ed.) 2273.

I adopt the reasoning advanced in 4 Moore’s Fed.Prac. (2d ed.) 1048, that special reason to obtain leave should be shown. The plaintiff’s condition immediately after his mishap is not uncommon in cases of this kind and does not constistute justification for granting the relief sought herein.

However, this disposition is without prejudice to an application for the same relief on notice. F.R.Civ.P. 33, 28 U.S. C.A.
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 176

Honoring the San Fernando Cathedral and the city of San Antonio on 

the occasion of the completion of the cathedral’s renovation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2003

Mr. GONZALEZ (for himself and Mr. RODRIGUEZ) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Honoring the San Fernando Cathedral and the city of San 

Antonio on the occasion of the completion of the cathedral’s renovation.

Whereas San Fernando Cathedral was founded in 1731, and 

was the first parish church in the State of Texas, which 

was then the Spanish province of Coahuila; 

Whereas, at the request of the Crown of Spain, settlers from 

the Canary Islands established a colony in Texas and 

founded the San Fernando Cathedral in 1731, naming it 

La Villa de San Fernando after the king who fought to 

drive out the Moors from Spain in the 13th century; 

Whereas the cathedral is the oldest building in Texas and the 

oldest cathedral in the Nation; 
2

•HRES 176 IH 

Whereas San Fernando Cathedral has survived numerous 

fires, floods, wars, and battles, including the Battle of the 

Alamo in 1836; 

Whereas the cathedral has existed under the governments of 

Spain, Mexico, the Republic of Texas, the United States, 

and, during the Civil War, the Confederate States of 

America; 

Whereas a 6-year project to renovate San Fernando is now 

complete; 

Whereas the newly-restored San Fernando Cathedral serves 

as a tribute to the traditional Spanish artwork used in 

Spanish Colonial churches in the Americas, and includes 

a hand carved stone baptismal font that is believed to be 

a gift of King Charles III of Spain in 1759, and a 24-

foot retablo handcrafted in Mexico that is a new addition 

to the cathedral; 

Whereas after the United States took control of Texas, the 

cathedral served the Hispanic people through their language, customs, and religious traditions; 

Whereas San Fernando Cathedral, throughout its history, 

has been of particular significance to the Hispanic community, and is a center for great Hispanic traditions 

such as the annual Passion Play, which attracts 25,000 

people; 

Whereas San Fernando Cathedral is the spiritual center of 

San Antonio, with over 4,000 people participating in 

masses at the cathedral each week; 

Whereas the San Antonio City Council is blessed at San Fernando Cathedral at the beginning of each term; and 

Whereas today San Fernando Cathedral is helping address 

the critical needs of the community by providing social 
3

•HRES 176 IH 

and educational services to the poor: Now, therefore, be 

it and and and and

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the San Fernando Cathedral and the city of San Antonio 

3 on the occasion of the completion of the cathedral’s ren4 ovation.

Æ
# table14afull22

&8Page &P of &N
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report on Form 10-Q of Viad Corp for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Viad Corp.
 Date: August 6, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Paul B. DykstraPaul B. DykstraChief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-151149, 333-117395,333-64256, 333-41247, 33-90972, and 33-43174) of WD-40 Company of our report dated October 18, 2010 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

San Diego, CA 

October 18, 2010
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v. Terry Lee CONDREY, a/k/a Jamil, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7423.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.

Terry Lee Condrey, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terry Lee Condrey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Condrey,*No. 3:11-cr-00065-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
IV 

House Calendar No. 2

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 15

[Report No. 108–2] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 1) making 

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for other 

purposes, and for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 2) 

making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

1) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes, and for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 2) making further 

continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and 

for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. 
2

HRES 15 RH 

1 Res. 1) making further continuing appropriations for the 

2 fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes. The joint resolu3 tion shall be considered as read for amendment. The pre4 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 

5 resolution to final passage without intervening motion ex6 cept: (1) one hour of debate on the joint resolution equally 

7 divided and controlled by Representative Young of Florida 

8 and Representative Obey of Wisconsin; and (2) one motion 

9 to recommit. 

10 SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall 

11 be in order without intervention of any point of order to 

12 consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 2) 

13 making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal 

14 year 2003, and for other purposes. The joint resolution 

15 shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous 

16 question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolu17 tion to final passage without intervening motion except: 

18 (1) one hour of debate on the joint resolution equally di19 vided and controlled by Representative Young of Florida 

20 and Representative Obey of Wisconsin; and (2) one motion 

21 to recommit. 

House Calendar No. 2

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 15

[Report No. 108–2] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 1) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes, and for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 2) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes. 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed