alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of PALIGENT INC. (the “Company”) for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), Salvatore A. Bucci, as Chief Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 12, 2006 | by:    | /s/ Salvatore A. Bucci                |   |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Salvatore A. Bucci                    |
|                    |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |   | (Principal Financial Officer)         |

 

----
[902 NYS2d 924]

#### Lu Huang, Petitioner, v Di Yuan Karaoke, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Queens County,

June 16, 2010

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Burns & Harris,*New York City *(Christopher Donadío*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Charles J. Markey, J.

In *Savino v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.*(22 Misc 3d 792 [Sup Ct, Queens County 2008]), the undersigned held, in a case *921of first impression, that a defendant storekeeper was required to turn over an unredacted copy of a crucial video surveillance evidence tape that would be vitally and decisively crucial in determining whether the plaintiff feigned her slip-and-fall injury in a supermarket.

*Savino*was a personal injury case predicated on alleged negligence. Under the facts of the present application, the potential cause of action, inter alia, appears to be for an intentional tort of battery. Such a possibility was forewarned by the undersigned’s decision in *Savino*where the court indicated that video surveillance tapes would be the most important evidence in all sorts of cases, including claimed assaults by store employees or fellow customers.

What makes this case distinguishable from *Savino,*where the undersigned ordered the defendant store to share immediately all video surveillance tapes with plaintiffs counsel, is that, on this application, there is no action yet. Petitioner’s application for a copy of respondent’s video surveillance tape, together with requests for the full name and address of the security company and the address of its employee security guard or “bouncer,” is all made as part of pre-action discovery on this order to show cause. Nevertheless, the principles of justice and fair play that underlie this court’s decision in *Savino*apply equally to this pre-action discovery matter.

On the return date, the court indicated to Christopher James Donadío, Esq., petitioner’s counsel, that, in the future, it expects compliance with 22 NYCRR 202.7, regarding the submission of a good faith affirmation on all discovery disputes. In light of the particular circumstances of this case, and the prospect that respondent may be destroying or concealing the potent evidence, the court agrees with Mr. Donadío that failure to submit such an affirmation is excused under the facts of the present case because of the demonstrated prejudice by the respondent’s cavalier and disingenuous stonewalling. The court also notes that respondent has failed to appear although being duly served with the order to show cause and the temporary restraining order preventing the destruction of the video surveillance evidence.

The motion, by order to show cause, by petitioner Lu Huang is granted in all respects without opposition. Submit order with all proper decretal paragraphs to the clerk’s office in Jamaica before onward transmission to the undersigned.

The temporary restraining order is continued in all respects until further court order. Any attempt to destroy the video *922surveillance evidence will be dealt with severely pursuant to this court’s seminal decision in *Savino.*
**Exhibit  99.1**

**CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the  Quarterly Report of MedQuist Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for  the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Cohen, President  and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §  1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  

(1) The Report fully    complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial    condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| /s/David A. Cohen                          |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |
| David A. Cohen                             |
| President and Chief      Executive Officer |
| November 14, 2002                          |

----
EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>

                    WATKINS-JOHNSON COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1994, 1993
                (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<CAPTION>
                                                      YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                                 -----------------------------------
                                                   1995        1994          1993
                                                ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                              <C>          <C>          <C>
For primary net income per share:
  Weighted average shares outstanding .......    7,938,000    7,425,000    7,558,000
  Equivalent shares--dilutive stock
    options--based on treasury stock method
    using average market price ..............      838,000      728,000      367,000
                                                ----------   ----------   ----------
      Total .................................    8,776,000    8,153,000    7,925,000
                                                ==========   ==========   ==========
For fully diluted net income per share:
  Weighted average shares outstanding .......    7,938,000    7,425,000    7,558,000
  Equivalent  shares--dilutive stock
    options--based on treasury stock method
    using greater of average or ending market
    price .....................................    937,000      775,000      441,000
                                                ----------   ----------   ----------
     Total ....................................  8,875,000    8,200,000    7,999,000
                                                ==========   ==========   ==========
Net income ..................................      $31,428      $20,961      $11,596
                                                   =======      =======      =======
Primary net income per share ................        $3.58        $2.57        $1.46
                                                     =====        =====        =====
Fully diluted net income per share  ........         $3.54        $2.56        $1.45
                                                     =====        =====        =====
<FN>

This   calculation  is  submitted  in  accordance   with  Regulation  S-K,  Item
601(b)(11).
</FN>
</TABLE>

                                       33
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 15

- 15041 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5 :1 2

- cv - 0 0497

- LJA

JEREMY D. EVERIDGE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v ersus

WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , in its Individual Capacity and as a Successor by Merger to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. , FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,
Defendant s - Appellee s .

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________ (May 25, 2016) Case: 15-15041 Date Filed: 05/25/2016 Page: 1 of 32 Before TJOFLAT , WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Jeremy D. Everidge appeals the district court’s dismissal of his various state law claims against Wells Fargo and the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). Everidge brought a diversity action in district court against Wells Fargo and Fannie Mae, alleging, inter alia , fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of contract, wrongful foreclosure, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and inten tional infliction of emotional distress. The court granted summary judgment to Wells Fargo on all of Everidge’s claims against it

. Moreover , after denying Everidge’s request s to amend his complaint to include additional allegations against Fannie Mae, th e court dismissed on the pleadings Everidge’s claims against Fa nnie Mae

. On appeal, Everidge argues that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on his claims that Wells Fargo (1) made fraudulent represent ations to him about insurance proceeds and a loan modification contract ; (2) breached a loan modification contract ; (3) violated the terms of hi s security deed; (4) wrongfully
foreclosed hi s property; (5) failed to exercise good faith and fair dealing in carrying out its contractual ob ligations as the servicer of hi s mortgage loan; and (6) intentionally inflicted emotional distress on him

. Everidge also claims that the

Case: 15-15041 Date Filed: 05/25/2016 Page: 2 of 33 district court erred by denying his requests to amend his complaint to include additional allegations against Fannie M ae. After careful consideration of the record and the parties’ briefs, we find no reversible error as to any of the issues raised by Everidge. For substantially the same reasons given by the thorough opinion of the district court , we conclude that
the court properly dis missed all of E v eridge’s claims and appropriately denied his requests to amend his complaint

. See Everidge v. Wells Fargo Bank , No. 12

- 00 497 (M.D. Ga. Sept. 29, 2015)

. AFFIRMED. Case: 15-15041 Date Filed: 05/25/2016 Page: 3 of 3
[No. 54738-1-I.

Division One.

October 24, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Gerald Lee Whiteman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 03-1-01044-2, Richard J. Thorpe, J., entered June 16, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

People of MI v Terreik Jaylel Latham 

Docket No. 338891 

LC No. 16-009739-01-FC 

Michael J. Riordan 

Presiding Judge 

David H. Sawyer 

Kathleen Jansen 

Judges 

The Court orders that the February 6, 2020 op1mon is hereby VACA TED, and 

a new opinion is attached. 

Presiding 

~~ Judge 

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

FEB 2 0 2020 

Date
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17911]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6709]


Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
the Kyrgyz Republic

    Pursuant to section 7088(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, 
Pub. L. 111-8) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
section 7088(c)(1) of the Act with respect to the Government of the 
Kyrgyz Republic, and I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 14, 2009.
Jacob L. Lew,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. E9-17911 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-46-P
Exhibit 10.7.2

 

AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of this 20th day of March, 2013, by and between COLT DEFENSE LLC (“Colt”) and GERALD R. DINKEL (“Executive”).

 

RECITALS

 

A.                                    Colt and Executive have entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of October 4, 2010 (the “Agreement”), which remains in full force and effect as of the date hereof.

 

B.                                    Colt and Executive wish to amend the Agreement in the manner described herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, Colt and the Executive do hereby agree as follows.

 

1.                                      Unless otherwise stated, all defined terms used herein that are defined in the Agreement shall have the same meaning herein as they do in the Agreement.

 

2.                                      Paragraph 2(d) of the Agreement shall remain in effect in accordance with its terms through and including March 31, 2013.

 

3.                                      Effective April 1, 2013, Paragraph 2(d) of the Agreement shall be deemed deleted and replaced with the following paragraph:

 

(d) Temporary Living Expenses.  Colt will provide Executive temporary living expenses consisting of the rental of an apartment similar in living conditions with the apartment being rented as of the date hereof (including continuance of the rental of such apartment), including all periodic payment obligations under the apartment lease, plus, to the extent paid for by the tenant, heat, hot water, air conditioning, electricity, cable and Internet service, in each case consistent with the payments being made with respect to the existing temporary rental residence of Executive in West Hartford, CT.  Colt will gross up that amount so that the receipt of these benefits will be tax neutral to Executive.

 

4.                                      Paragraph 3(a) is deleted effective April 1, 2013 and replaced with the following:

 

(a) Base Salary.  Executive’s base salary shall be $550,000, paid in regular installments in accordance with Colt’s payroll practices.

 











 

5.                                      Except as hereinabove set forth, the Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

 

Dated as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

	
COLT DEFENSE LLC
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/Daniel   Standen
    	
 
    	
/s/   Gerald R. Dinkel
    
	
 
    	
Daniel   Standen
    	
 
    	
Gerald   R. Dinkel
    
	
 
    	
Chairman   of the Governing Board
Exhibit 15.1











November
5, 2004



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated November 5, 2004 on our review of interim financial information of Stratus Properties Inc. for the three-months and nine-months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and included in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, is incorporated by reference in the Companys Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-78798, 333-31059, 333-52995 and 333-104288).

Yours very truly,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
# 21QRTL1_00
Exhibit 99.3



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '
1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. '
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Denmark Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Darrell R. Lemmens              
|------------------------------------
|Darrell R. Lemmens,                 
|Principal Executive Officer,        
|Chairman of the Board, and President



|/s/ Dennis J. Heim           
|-----------------------------
|Dennis J. Heim               
|Vice President and Treasurer,
|Principal Financial and      
|Accounting Officer           
|                             
|Date:  July 16, 2003
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Michael C. Keefe, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of International Fight League, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: December 6, 2007 |  |                                                                                                   
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | /s/ Michael C. KeefeMichael C. Keefe
Executive Vice President
(Acting Principal Financial Officer)

---



QuickLinks
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 825

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7401 West 100th Place in Bridgeview, 

Illinois, as the ‘‘Michael J. Healy Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 825 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 7401 West 100th Place in Bridgeview, Illinois, 

4 and known as the Moraine Valley Post Office, shall be 

5 known and designated as the ‘‘Michael J. Healy Post Of6 fice Building’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

11 to the ‘‘Michael J. Healy Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 26, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                       118
<INVENTORY>                                      4,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,524
<PP&E>                                           3,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,266
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,448
<SALES>                                         11,694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,696
<CGS>                                            9,428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,086
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (89)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (28)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (61)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (61)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18,UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers of  Alternative  Technology  Resources,  Inc.,  a Delaware
corporation (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the " Form10-Q") that, to the best
of their  knowledge:

     (1)  the Form10-Q fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2003                                    /S/ JEFFREY S. MCCORMICK
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Jeffrey S. McCormick
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 15, 2003                                    /S/ JAMES W. CAMERON, JR.
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       James W. Cameron, Jr.
                                                       Chief Financial Officer



                                       24