alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Dated: August 8, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Ronald L. RubinRonald L. RubinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 30
#### Jose Adalberto Arias JOVEL, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 10-72105, 10-73444.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Dec. 28, 2012.

Jose Adalberto Arias Jovel, Los Ange-les, CA, pro se.

David Nicholas Harling, Trial, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated petitions for review, Jose Adalberto Arias Jovel, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal, and denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part, and deny in part, the petitions for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Arias Jovel’s challenge to the discretionary denial of his application for cancellation of removal. *See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey,*552 F.3d 975, 978 (9th Cir.2009). The agency did not err in admitting evidence regarding Arias Jovel’s criminal history. *See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft,*339 F.3d 814, 823 (9th Cir.2003) (the sole test for admission of evidence in immigration proceedings is whether the evidence is probative and its admission is fundamentally fair). Arias Jovel’s contention that the BIA’s analysis was inadequate also fails. *See Abebe v. Gonzales,*432 F.3d 1037, 1040 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc) *(Burbano*affir-mance signifies that the BIA has conducted an independent review of the record and has determined that its conclusions are the same as those articulated by the IJ).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Arias Jovel’s motion to reopen on the ground that he failed to establish his conviction as no longer valid for immigration purposes. *Planes v. Holder,*652 F.3d 991, 996 (9th Cir.2011) (a conviction is “final” for immigration purposes where a judgment of guilt has been entered and a punishment imposed, even where a direct appeal or collateral attack is pending). We lack jurisdiction to consider Arias Jov-el’s contention that the plea to his underlying criminal conviction was vacated because he failed to raise this issue before the BIA and therefore failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

*709PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GERARD GETHERS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 321 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of October, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 145 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 145

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 
                  in the One Hundred Eighth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2003

Mr. Manzullo submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 
                  in the One Hundred Eighth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Small Business (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $6,372,008 for the One Hundred 
Eighth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $3,080,591 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2003, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2004; and
            (2) not more than $3,291,417 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2004, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2005.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06

- 1 0

- 00 192

- CR

______________________________

PAMELA JEAN SWEET , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 336th Judicial District Court

Fannin County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR

- 09

- 23264

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pamela Jean Sweet, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss her appeal.

The motion is signed by Sweet and by her counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Ru le 42.2, we

grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: December 16, 2010

Date Decided: December 17, 2010

Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 14 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                   House Calendar No. 1
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 14

                           [Report No. 108-1]

  Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 23) to provide for a 5-
month extension of the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act 
     of 2002 and for a transition period for individuals receiving 
           compensation when the program under such Act ends.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 23) to provide for a 5-
month extension of the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act 
     of 2002 and for a transition period for individuals receiving 
           compensation when the program under such Act ends.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (S. 23) to provide for a 5-month extension of the 
Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002 and for a 
transition period for individuals receiving compensation when the 
program under such Act ends. The bill shall be considered as read for 
amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 
of debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by Representative 
Thomas of California and Representative Rangel of New York; and (2) on 
motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2. The allocations referred to in section 3(a)(4)(B)(i) of 
House Resolution 5 may be submitted by Representative Nussle of Iowa.

                                                   House Calendar No. 1

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. RES. 14

                           [Report No. 108-1]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 23) to provide for a 5-
month extension of the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act 
     of 2002 and for a transition period for individuals receiving 
           compensation when the program under such Act ends.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 7, 2003

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Opinion issued January 24, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 8
- 0 0 548
- CV

——————————— OLDACRE MCDONALD, LLC AND MARK MCDONALD, QUATTRO DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND MICHAEL LIYEOS, AND MADISON

DEVELOPMENT GROUP , LLC , Appellant s

V. MATTRESS FIRM, INC. , Appellee

O n Appeal from the 1 5 1 s t District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017
- 73196

MEMORANDUM O RDER Appellant s , Oldacre McDonald, LLC and Mark McDonald , h a ve filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss the i r appeal

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2), 42. 1( a) (1)

. These appellants contend that the appellee no longer wishes2

to pursue its claims against them and the parties will be filing a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice in the trial court and, thus, they move to dismiss their appeal

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1( a)(1)

. T hree other appellants have filed two separate notice s of appeal , but are not moving to dismiss, and no opinion has issued

. See
T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(1), ( c)

. Accordingly, we grant appellant s Oldacre McDonald, LLC and Mark
McDonald ’s motion and dismiss the i r appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(1) , 43.2(f)

. The appeals by Quattro Development, LLC and Michael Liyeos , and Madison Development Group , LLC , remain pending. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1 ( b )

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley , and Landau

.
Exhibit 3.2





CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

to the

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

of

FM PROPERTIES INC.





FM Properties Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the Corporation), does hereby certify that:

FIRST:  The Corporations Board of Directors, by unanimous written consent dated as of March 27, 1998, duly adopted the following resolution:



RESOLVED, That Article FIRST of the Corporations Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation be amended to read in its entirety as follows:



FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is Stratus Properties Inc.



SECOND:  The Corporations Board of Directors declared the foregoing amendment to be advisable and directed that the proposed amendment be submitted to a vote of the Corporations stockholders at the 1998 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Corporation.

THIRD:  At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 14, 1998, the Corporations stockholders duly approved the foregoing amendment and such amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Chairman of the Board of the Corporation, for the purpose of amending the Corporations Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, does hereby make this Certificate of Amendment, hereby declaring and certifying that this is the act and deed of the Corporation and the facts herein stated are true, and accordingly the undersigned has hereunto set his hand as of this 14th day of May, 1998.





FM PROPERTIES INC.

(to be named Stratus Properties Inc. pursuant

to this Certificate of Amendment)







By: /s/ Richard C. Adkerson

Richard C. Adkerson

Chairman of the Board





CORPORATE SEAL









Attest: Michael C. Kilanowski, Jr.

Michael C. Kilanowski, Jr.

Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,149,129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,764,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (121,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    171,869
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,977,996
<PP&E>                                       6,128,490
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,201,604)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,629,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,189,976
<BONDS>                                      3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        243
<COMMON>                                         2,491
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,689,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,629,448
<SALES>                                     16,076,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,076,376
<CGS>                                       11,487,361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,191,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (160,422)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                724,139
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   724,139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1I, Henry Fahman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of JEANTEX GROUP, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the year covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the years presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I,are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the year in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the year covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalentfunctions);

1

---

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2008/s/ Henry FahmanHenry FahmanInterim Chief Executive/Financial Officer

2

---
Back to Quarterly Report

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION** **906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

In connection with the Fiscal Quarter End Report of Authentidate Holding Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, being, John T. Botti, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Dennis H. Bunt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectfully, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

Dated: February 13, 2004

| /s/ John T. BottiChief Executive Officer | /s/ Dennis H. Bunt Chief Financial Officer |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|

 

----
Shareholder Meeting Results (unaudited)

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Narragansett Insured Tax-Free
Income Fund (the "Fund") was held on October 14, 2004.  The holders
of shares representing 72% of the total net asset value of the shares
entitled to vote were present in person or by proxy.  At the meeting,
the following matters were voted upon and approved by the shareholders
(the resulting votes for each matter are presented below).

1. To elect Trustees.

Number of  Votes:

		Trustee				For		Withheld

		Lacy B. Herrmann			9,761,096	28,555
		Vernon R. Alden			9,760,996	28,655
		Paul Y. Clinton			9,760,996	28,655
		David A. Duffy			9,761,596	28,055
		Willliam J. Nightingale		9,761,596	28,055
		John J. Partridge			9,761,596	28,055
		Cornelius T. Ryan			9,760,262	29,390
		J. William Weeks			9,759,901	29,751

2. To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the Fund's independent
auditors.

Number of  Votes:

		For			Against		Abstain

		9,765,890		7,131			16,630