alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,271
<SECURITIES>                                    45,353
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,096
<PP&E>                                         140,224
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 245,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,078
<BONDS>                                         32,701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,454
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   245,478
<SALES>                                        212,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               212,200
<CGS>                                          161,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               122,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (73,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (23,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (49,208)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (49,208)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (6.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (6.36)
        


</TABLE>
Report of Ernst and Young LLP, Independent Auditors

To the Shareholders and
Board of Trustees of Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of
Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund for the year ended September
30, 2003, we considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR,
not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund is
responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control.  In
fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management
are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of
controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to
the entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external
purposes that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.  Those controls
include the safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition,
use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may
occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of
internal control to future periods is subject to the risk that it may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the
effectiveness of the design and operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose
all matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not
reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by
error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the
financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within
a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their
assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving internal
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above
as of September 30, 2003.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of Tax-Exempt California Money
Market Fund and the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.


Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 14, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 12
 
 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (in thousands)
    
    2007
    
    2006
    
    2005
    
    2004
    
    2003EarningsLoss before taxes
    
    
    (99,264
    )
    
    
    (91,642
    )
    
    
    (81,547
    )
    
    
    (76,802
    )
    
    
    (26,732
    )Add: Fixed Charges
    
    
    6,151
    
    
    
    3,635
    
    
    
    2,161
    
    
    
    2,871
    
    
    
    2,198Less: Capitalized Interest
    
    
    229
    
    
    
    1,536
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total Earnings (as defined)
    
    
    (93,342
    )
    
    
    (89,543
    )
    
    
    (79,386
    )
    
    
    (73,931
    )
    
    
    (24,534
    )Fixed ChargesInterest expense
    
    
    4,106
    
    
    
    336
    
    
    
    351
    
    
    
    255
    
    
    
    438Capitalized Interest
    
    
    229
    
    
    
    1,536
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Amortization of debt issuance costs
    
    
    278
    
    
    
    84
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total Interest Expensed and Capitalized
    
    
    4,613
    
    
    
    1,956
    
    
    
    356
    
    
    
    255
    
    
    
    438One-third of rental expense, net of sublease income
    
    
    1,537
    
    
    
    1,679
    
    
    
    1,806
    
    
    
    2,616
    
    
    
    1,760Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    6,151
    
    
    
    3,635
    
    
    
    2,161
    
    
    
    2,871
    
    
    
    2,198
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000885040
<NAME>                        VERMONT PURE
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,508,725
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,111,535
<ALLOWANCES>                                   367,437
<INVENTORY>                                    1,671,854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,774,224
<PP&E>                                         16,289,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,611,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,679,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,333,375
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,280
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,565,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   31,679,769
<SALES>                                        23,112,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               23,112,438
<CGS>                                          8,666,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,666,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,180,778
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             753,752
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,523,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,523,798
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,523,798
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.14



</TABLE>
No. 667.

No. 668.

No. 669.

No. 670.

#### West *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue; West *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Estate of West et al. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue; and West *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

June 10, 1946.

Third petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

*Ante,*p. 877.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7481** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ADRIAN LAMONT BENNIEFIELD, a/k/a Adrian Benniefield , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:09

- cr - 00055

- HEH

- 1 )

Submitted : November 21, 2013 Decided: November 26, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Adrian Lamont Benniefield , Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young, Assistant U nited States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not bindi ng precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Adrian Lamont Benniefield appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for
reduction of sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Benniefield ,
No. 3:09

- cr - 00055

- HEH

- 1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Advance copies of this statement are made available to the press 

under lock-up conditions with the explicit understanding that 

the data are embargoed until 8:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time. 

Statement of 

John M. Galvin 

Acting Commissioner 

Bureau of Labor Statistics 

Friday, June 1, 2012

Nonfarm payroll employment changed little in May (+69,000), 

and the unemployment rate was essentially unchanged at 8.2 

percent. Payroll employment rose by an average of 226,000 per 

month in the first quarter of the year; for April and May, the 

average was 73,000. Health care, transportation and 

warehousing, and wholesale trade added jobs in May, while 

construction employment declined. 

Health care employment rose by 33,000 in May, mostly in 

ambulatory health care services. Over the past 12 months, 

health care has added 340,000 jobs. 

Employment in transportation and warehousing increased by 

36,000 in May. Job gains in transit and ground passenger 

transportation (+20,000) and in courier and messenger services 

(+5,000) followed losses in those industries in April. 
2 

Employment in both industries has shown little net change over 

the year. 

Wholesale trade added 16,000 jobs over the month. 

Employment in this industry has risen by 184,000 since May 2010. 

Employment in manufacturing continued to trend up in May 

(+12,000) following a similar change in April (+9,000). The 

industry had added an average of 41,000 jobs a month during the 

first quarter of the year. 

Construction employment declined by 28,000 in May. Job 

losses were concentrated in specialty trade contractors and in 

heavy and civil engineering construction. 

Employment in other major industries changed little in May. 

Average hourly earnings of all employees on private nonfarm 

payrolls increased by 2 cents in May to $23.41. Over the past 

12 months, average hourly earnings have risen by 1.7 percent. 

From April 2011 to April 2012, the Consumer Price Index for All 

Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased by 2.3 percent. 

Turning now to our survey of households, the unemployment 

rate was little changed at 8.2 percent in May. The rate has 

been at or near that level since January. The number of 

unemployed persons, at 12.7 million, also changed little in May. 

The proportion of the unemployed who had been jobless for 27 

weeks or more was 42.8 percent. 
3 

In May, the labor force participation rate rose by 0.2 

percentage point to 63.8 percent. This followed a decline of 

the same amount in April. 

Among persons who were neither working nor looking for work 

in May, 2.4 million were classified as marginally attached to 

the labor force, up from 2.2 million a year earlier. These 

individuals wanted a job, were available for work, and had 

looked for a job within the last 12 months. The number of 

discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, was 

830,000 in May, about unchanged from a year earlier. 

In summary, payroll employment changed little over the 

month (+69,000). The unemployment rate, at 8.2 percent, was 

essentially unchanged.
Frontier Oilfield Services Inc. 10-K/A

** **

 

**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I,Don Lawhorne, certify that:

 

1.          Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Frontier Oilfield Services, Inc.;

 

2.          Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.          Basedon my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.          Iam responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15eand 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

 

a.          designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b.          designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed undermy supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidatedfinancial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c.          evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

d.          disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.          I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a.          allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; and

 

b.          anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls.

 

 

 22
[No. 23296-4-III.

Division Three.

December 6, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Bryan M. Cordova, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 04-8-00521-4, F. James Gavin, J., entered July 12, 2004. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Schultheis, J., and Thompson, J. Pro Tern.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>9
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
<PERIOD-START>JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>MAR-31-1997
<CASH)2,777
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>71,889
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>2,930
<TRADING-ASSETS>0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>18,384
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>3,571
<LOANS>69,984
<ALLOWANCE>801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>100,167
<DEPOSITS>81,386
<SHORT-TERM>4,160
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>1,001
<LONG-TERM>5,020
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>0
<PREFERRED>0
<COMMON>2664
<OTHER-SE>5,936
<INTEREST-LOAN>1,607
<INTEREST-INVEST>388
<INTEREST-OTHER>0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>1,994
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>787  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>907  
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>1,088
<LOAN-LOSSES>47 
<SECURITIES-GAINS>0  
<EXPENSE-OTHER>716  
<INCOME-PRETAX>518
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>518  
<EXTRAORDINARY>(171)
<CHANGES>0
<NET-INCOME>347
<EPS-PRIMARY>0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>0.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>4.58
<LOANS-NON>248
<LOANS-PAST>0 
<LOANS-TROUBLED>0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>761
<CHARGE-OFFS>11 
<RECOVERIES>4 
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>801
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>0
        

</TABLE>
H. R. 981

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 141 Erie

Street in Linesville, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘James R. Merry Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

141 Erie Street in Linesville, Pennsylvania, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘James R. Merry Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James

R. Merry Post Office’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000105860
<NAME> WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1995           DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1995           DEC-31-1994
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          680,572               663,855
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>            872                   982
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              66,496                62,015
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            26,092                26,914
<OTHER-ASSETS>                      41,582                18,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     815,614               771,977
<COMMON>                           137,214               137,214
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            2,236                 2,236
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                125,770               132,504
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     265,220               271,594
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0                     0
<PREFERRED>                          6,291                 6,291
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>               273,245               210,047
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  19,820                46,315
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0                     0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0                     0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>            0                   650
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0                     0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     251,038               236,720
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      815,614               771,977
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          319,835               342,991
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 5,542                17,954
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         254,807               270,274
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         260,349               288,228
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             59,486                54,763
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     (85)                4,360
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      59,401                59,123
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>            24,871                21,757
<NET-INCOME>                        34,530                37,366
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            264                   452
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       34,266                36,914
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            41,000                31,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>           21,413                18,547
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              53,340                28,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .18                   .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .18                   .19
        

</TABLE>
# TOC

(PDF)

(HTML)

# Table 1

# Table 2

# Table 3

# Table 4

# Table 5

# Table 6

# Table 7

# Table 8

# Table 9

# Table 10
Opinion issued October 15, 2013.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00763
- CV

——————————— IN RE ESTATE OF SAYD A J. HERNANDEZ , Relator

O riginal Proceeding o n Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, the Estate of Sayda J. Hernandez, filed a petition for writ of mandamus, contending that respondent, the Honorable Michael Landrum, abused his discretion in conducting a hea ring on relator’s motion to quash depositions without proper notice to relator, and ordering depositions and discovery to proceed2

over relator’s objections

. 1 Relator ’s counsel subsequently filed a letter in this Court stating that he has decided to withdraw the petition for writ of mandamus . We construe counsel’s letter as a motion to dismiss the petition. The letter has been on file with the Court for more than ten days . Neither the real part y in interest , Sandpiper Apartments, LP, nor respondent ha s expressed opposition to withdrawal of the petition for writ of mandamus

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2)

. We grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, an d Brown.

1 The petition identifies the underlying case a s Omar Castro, as Representative of the Estate of Sayda J. Reyes Hernandez, Deceased, and as Legal Guardi an of MOC and JEC , Minor Children, and Miriam Elizabeth Hernandez, Individually and as Next Friend of ACG and MIG, Minor Children v. Sandpiper Apartments, LP , Cause No. 201 1

- 57667 , in the 1 13 th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Landrum , presiding

.