alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, July 30, 2009 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, July 30, 2009 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings; and an adjudicatory matter.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: July 22, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-17860 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
EXHIBIT 12.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

           We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-12586, 333-13786, 333-14142,
333-83914 and 333-104070), of our report dated February, 4 2003, with respect to
the consolidated financial statement of Alvarion Ltd. included in this annual
report on Form 20-F for year ended December 31, 2002.



                                               /s/ KOST, FORER and GABBAY
Tel-Aviv, Israel                               A Member of Ernst & Young Global


June 23, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CRUISESTOCK, INC
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Cruisestock, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15e for the small business issuer and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidating subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/  Bryan McGuireName:
    Bryan McGuireTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
# table14full20

&8Page &P of &N
No. 989.

#### William Spencer & Son Corp. *v.*Lowe, Deputy Commissioner, et al.

May 6, 1946.

*Charles Landesman, John J. Hickey*and *Walter W. Ahrens*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General Sonnett, Paul A. Sweeney*and *Leon Frechtel*for Lowe, and *Isidor Enselman*for Lindenberg, respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
art_ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.01


 


[ARTEMIS ACQUISITION CORPORATION]


 







 


Executive Hiring Agreement


 


Today February 20, 2013, this hiring agreement between Artemis Acquisition Corp. and John Ronda Sr. as our President of Artemis Acquisition Corp. parent public company.


 


Salary is to be at $250,000 per year, for now starting at $1000 per week for the next 120 days or less, until Artemis is trading publicly and will be able to increase all officers’ salaries at that time.


 


President / John Ronda will receive 5,000,000 common shares as a hiring bonus.  Future stock bonuses and stock grants / options will be determined and agreed upon with all officers of the Company.


 


Plans to be agreed upon in the future for the Company to pay for an office in California for John Ronda is agreed and will be offered when the Company is financially able to provide in the coming months.


 


All expenses for travel or lodging for the company will be paid by the company.


 


This agreement will be for a five year period from today’s date.


 


 


 



	/s/ John Ronda Sr.	 
	John Ronda Sr.	 
	 	 
	/s/ Pete Iodice	 
	Pete Iodice	 
	Vice Chairman of the board	 
	Artemis Acquisition Corp.	 
	 	 
	/s/ Robert Nash	 
	Robert Nash	 
	Senior Vice President	 
	Artemis Acquisition Corp.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) is computed based on weighted average shares outstanding of Class A and Class B common stock and excludes any potential dilution.  In accordance with EITF 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128 (EITF 03-6), which nullifies EITF Topic D-95, Effect of Participating Convertible Securities on the Computation of Basic Earnings Per Share, the Companys participating convertible securities, which include the Class C common stock, are not included in the computation of basic EPS because the participating securities do not have a contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company.  The provisions of EITF 03-6 became effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2004.  The adoption of this new pronouncement did not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.



Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution from the exercise or conversion of all dilutive securities into common stock based on the average market price of common shares outstanding during the period.  The number of common shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of options and warrants or conversion of the participating convertible securities that were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation, because they are antidilutive are as follows:



|                                | As of December 31,
|------------------------------- | ------------------
|                                | 2003              
|Potential conversion of Class C |                   
|common stock                    | (a)               
|                                |                   
|Options                         | 62,518,000        
|                                |                   
|Warrants                        | 10,000,000        



(a)

The potential conversion of Class C common stock is contingent on a future event and, accordingly, the number of shares of Class A common stock to be issued with respect to such potential conversion of the Class C common shares cannot be quantified as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 (see Note 10).  There were 55,838,547, 20,000,000 and -0- shares of Class C common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.



{A0023800.DOC}
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 606 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 606

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide that individuals who 
  are eligible to join the Armed Forces of the United States are also 
              eligible to be security screening personnel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide that individuals who 
  are eligible to join the Armed Forces of the United States are also 
              eligible to be security screening personnel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 
44935(e)(2)(A)(ii) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:
                            ``(ii) to be eligible to be a security 
                        screener if the individual is eligible to join 
                        the Armed Forces of the United States;''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ken R. Van Vorce et al., Respondents, v Buffalo-Greenbriar Associates, LLC et al., Appellants.

[853 NYS2d 518]

Present-Martoche, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
/Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.
Statement of registered  closed-end investment company with respect to purchases
of its own securities pursuant to Rule N-23(c)-1 during the last calendar month.

Report for the calendar month ending September 30, 1998

MFS Government Markets Income Trust
Date        Identification   Shares RepurchaseRepurchase       NAV       Broker
            of Security                       Price
9/16/98     Shares of        57,500           6.6875           7.40      Merrill
            Beneficial                                                   Lynch
            Interest
9/24/98     Shares of        43,000           6.6875           7.48      Merrill
            Beneficial                                                   Lynch
            Interest








Total Shares Repurchased:  100,500
Remarks: None.

MFS Government Markets Income Trust
by:  W. Thomas London
         W. Thomas London
         Treasurer
# cpsaat17
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 16, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 05-40041 Summary Calendar

_____________________ ELLEN FOUNTAIN, Plaint iff- Appellant,
versus BROOKLAND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; JOHN LYNCH, Defendants-Appellees.

__________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CV-488

__________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is affirmed for these reasons: 1. An at-will employee has no property right to employment. The school district did provide a procedure for Fountain to complain of her termination, but she chose not to f ile a grievance. There was no due process violation.2

2. There was no allegation or evidence of any custom or policy of the school district th at violated federal law. 3. Fountain was terminated before her speech to the board, and her speech was stopped because she was discussing that termination. Her telling Lynch of her int ention to speak to the Board was procedural and unrelated to public concern by her own admission. There was no free speech deprivation. And no legal claim is raised by the evidence against Lynch. 4. Plaint iff’s mo ti on to wi thdraw admissions, filed over four months after failure to make timely denial and after discovery was completed, was permissibly denied by th e court. AFFIRMED.
### ^!N^h^ *"** ^^ ^s w^ uy^ c^ft^A-s t^vW^ <&^ ^>AA&A ^uACv* _ A—J BEOBVED IN OCT 1^ 201*5 \^y\o
EX-10.23



 Exhibit 10.23 
 Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement 

with Steven E. Keller 
 This Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 15, 2008, as amended (the “Agreement”) by and between Affinia Group Inc. (the
“Company”) and Steven E. Keller (“Executive”) is made this 29th day of August 2012. Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings assigned to such terms under the Agreement. 

The Company and Executive have determined that it is in their best interests to amend the Agreement to provide for an automatic extension
of the Employment Term upon the occurrence of a Change of Control. In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the continued employment of Executive by the Company, the parties agree as follows: 

1. Term of Employment. Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add a new proviso at the end of the last sentence of
Section 1 to read as follows: 
 “; provided further that, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined in
the Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan) during the Employment Term, the Employment Term shall be automatically extended until the first December 31 following the 18 month anniversary of the Change of Control date.”

 2. Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms of the Agreement shall be and remain unchanged and the Agreement as amended
hereby shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed. 
  

			
	AFFINIA GROUP INC.
	
	 /s/ Terry R. McCormack

	By:	 	Terry R. McCormack
		 	Chief Executive Officer
	
	 /s/ Steven E. Keller

	Steven E. Keller
H. Res. 113

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 26, 2003.

Whereas approximately 3,000,000 reports of suspected or

known child abuse and neglect involving 5,000,000 American children are made to child protective service agencies

each year;

Whereas 556,000 American children are unable to live safely

with their families and are placed in foster homes and institutions;

Whereas it is estimated that more than 1,200 children, 85

percent of whom are under the age of 6 years and 44

percent of whom are under the age of 1 year, lose their

lives as a direct result of abuse and neglect every year

in the United States;

Whereas this tragic social problem results in human and economic costs due to its relationship to crime and delinquency, drug and alcohol abuse, domestic violence, and

welfare dependency; and

Whereas Childhelp USA has initiated a ‘‘Day of Hope’’ to be

observed on Wednesday, April 2, 2003, during Child

Abuse Prevention Month, to focus public awareness on

this social ill: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That—
2

•HRES 113 EH

(1) it is the sense of the House of Representatives

that—

(A) all Americans should keep the victims of

child abuse and neglect in their thoughts and prayers;

(B) all Americans should seek to break the

cycle of child abuse and neglect and to give these

victimized children hope for the future; and

(C) the faith community, nonprofit organizations, and volunteers across the United States

should recommit themselves and mobilize their resources to assist these abused and neglected children; and

(2) the House of Representatives—

(A) supports the goals and ideals of the ‘‘Day

of Hope’’, which was initiated by Childhelp USA;

and

(B) commends Childhelp USA for all of its efforts on behalf of abused and neglected children

throughout the United States.

Attest:

Clerk.
EX-10.139d



 Exhibit 10.139d 

CASH INCENTIVE AWARD AGREEMENT 
 AGREEMENT made effective February 1, 2013 by and among Tiffany & Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Tiffany and Company, the New York subsidiary corporation of the
Company (“Tiffany”) and — (“Executive”). 
 Whereas, on
March 17, 2005 the Board of Directors of the Company adopted, and on May 19, 2005 the stockholders of the Company duly approved, the Company’s 2005 Employee Incentive Plan, as subsequently amended (the “Plan”); and

 Whereas, the Stock Option Subcommittee of the Compensation Committee of the Company was appointed the “Committee”
under the Plan by said Board of Directors; and 
 NOW THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing and in consideration of the mutual
promises hereinafter set forth, it is hereby AGREED as follows: 
 1. This Agreement is intended to be an Award Agreement under
the Plan and is subject to all terms and conditions set forth in such Plan, including the Plan provisions limiting implied rights. 
 2. Executive agrees that he/she shall not be entitled to any cash bonus in respect of the fiscal year ending January 31, 2014 except as provided in this Agreement. 

3. Tiffany agrees to pay, or, failing that, the Company shall pay, cash Incentive Award to Executive in respect of the fiscal year ending
January 31, 2014 only as follows: 
 (a)     Such award shall be paid, if at all, following the close of such fiscal
year and after financial results have been determined and publicly announced, provided that Executive remains employed with Tiffany through the end of such fiscal year; 
 (b)     No award shall be payable unless the following Performance Measure is achieved: the Company’s consolidated net earnings for such fiscal year (as adjusted by the Committee
pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Plan) equal or exceed $268.2 million; 
 (c)     If the condition stated in
subparagraph (b) is satisfied, a maximum Incentive Award of $—[see Schedule of Maximum Awards attached] will be payable to you, subject to the discretion of the Committee to reduce such award;
the Committee will not be limited in the exercise of such discretion. 
 4. This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the
State of New York applicable to agreements made and to be performed within said state. 

  
 Page 1 of 2









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, parties hereto have entered into this Agreement effective as of the date
first stated above. 
  

					
		 		 	Tiffany & Co.
		 		 	(the “Company”)
			
	  
	 		 	  

	[Name of Executive]	 		 	
			
		 		 	Tiffany and Company
		 		 	(“Tiffany”)
			
		 		 	  


 Schedule of Maximum Incentive Awards 
 Michael J. Kowalski — $2,000,000 
 Frederic Cumenal — $1,190,000 

Beth O. Canavan — $1,036,000 
 James N.
Fernandez — $1,190,000 
 Jon King — $1,036,000 

  
 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Giant Jr. Investments, Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Javan Khazali, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.



/s/ Javan Khazali
-------------------
Javan Khazali
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Dec 15, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended October 28, 2006 of Stein Mart, Inc. (the Form 10-Q), I, Michael D. Fisher, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: December 6, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael D. Fisher                                  
|                       |  |  |  | Michael D. Fisher President and Chief
Executive Officer