alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), William H. Armstrong III, as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  November
14, 2003



/s/ William H. Armstrong III

William H. Armstrong III

Chairman of the Board, President and

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 10.4
    

    

    

    
      TERMINATION OF GRANT UNDER SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION 
LONG
      TERM INCENTIVE PLAN TO MARTY D. CASTEEL
    

    
      

      

      

      


    

    
      
        

        

      

      
        

        

        
          


        

      

      
        

        

      

    

    

    

    
      EXHIBIT 10.4
    

    
      

      


    

    
      TERMINATION OF GRANT UNDER
SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL
      CORPORATION
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
    

    
      

      


    

    
                WHEREAS,
      Marty D. Casteel ("Participant") was granted an award under
      the Simmons First National Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan ("Plan")
      for 2008;
    

    

    

    
                WHEREAS,
      the award consisted of $65,000.00 in cash and 2,241 shares of Simmons
      First National Corporation Common Stock ("SFNC Stock");
    

    

    

    
                WHEREAS,
      in light of the current economic conditions and the recently adopted
      statutory and regulatory provisions restricting the use of incentive
      compensation by certain financial institutions, the Company terminated
      the Plan;
    

    

    

    
                WHEREAS,
      the Company and the Participant have agreed that the Participant's 2008
      grant under the Plan should be terminated and cancelled.
    

    

    

    
                NOW,
      THEREFORE, the undersigned agree as follows:
    

    

    

    
                1.  Termination
      of Grant.  The 2008 LTIP grant to the Participant, consisting
      of  $65,000 in cash and 2,241 shares of SFNC Stock, is hereby terminated
      and cancelled, effective February 23, 2009.
    

    

    

    
                IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this instrument this ___
      day of _______________, 2009.
    

    
      

      


    

    
    	
           
        	
          
            SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION
          

        
	

        	

        	
           
        	

        	

        
	

        	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	

        	
          
            By
          

        	
           
        
	

        	

        	

        	
          
            Title:
          

        	
          
             
          

        
	

        	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	

        	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	

        	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	

        	
           
        	
           
        	
           
        	
           
        
	

        	

        	

        	
          
            Marty D. Casteel
Exhibit 31(c)

Certifications

I, Kerrii B. Anderson, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Wendys International, Inc.;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 28, 2008  
|                      
|/s/ KERRII B. ANDERSON
|Name:                  |  | Kerrii B. Anderson     
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
nene_ex101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


New Energy Solar Corporation


9192 Red Branch Road, Suite 110


Columbia, MD 21045




VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL


 


March 13, 2013


 


Valerie McDevitt


Assistant V.P. for Research Patents & Licensing


University of South Florida


Technology Transfer Office


3802 Spectrum Blvd., Suite 100


Tampa, FL  33612









	
Re:

	
Letter of Commitment to place in escrow funds to cover estimated costs for national filings associated with PCT Application No**** (****) filed on ****; entitled “****”.







 













 


Dear Valerie:







This is a letter of commitment  in which New Energy Solar Corporation commits to pay estimated costs to the University of South Florida (“USF”) filing fees associated with national stage filing of USF’s International Patent Application **** (****) in the following countries (the “Territory”):







****, ****, ****, ****, and ****.  The approximate estimated costs for each country and the cumulative total are as follows:








	
·  

	
****: US$****  








	
·  

	
****: US$****








	
·  

	
****: US$****








	
·  

	
****: US$****








	
·  

	
****: US$****







 



	 	
Total: US$****







 


Specifically, New Energy agrees that, prior to ****, they will provide payment totaling US$**** to USF.  Further, USF hereby commits, prior to the relevant PCT filing deadlines in each country, to nationally file the above-referenced Application in the ****, ****, ****, **** and ****, and use best efforts to ensure such filings are received.


 




  





1











  











The payment received from New Energy will be placed in escrow and used to pay the referenced estimated costs.  It is understood by both parties that the costs estimates are approximate and therefore actual fees incurred may vary. Any funds remaining after payment of all costs associated with these filings will be returned to New Energy.  If any amounts are due to USF, USF will invoice New Energy for these fees and New Energy agrees to pay as per USF/New Energy License Agreement number ****.







The foregoing is accepted and acknowledged by the undersigned:


 



	 	

New Energy Solar Corporation

	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date: March 13, 2013	
By: 

	/s/ 	 
	 	 	Name: John A. Conklin	 
	 	 	Title: President & CEO	 





 


 




	 	

University of South Florida

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
Date:

	
By: 

	/s/ 	 
	 	 	Name: Valerie McDevitt 	 
	 	 	Title: Assistant Vice President 	 

















 


2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of Open Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the following meeting of the Board of Advisors (BOA) to the President, Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) will be held. This meeting will be open to the public.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 9, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. and on Thursday, September 10, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. Eastern Time Zone.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Office of Naval Research, 875 N. Randolph Street, Suite 1435, Arlington, VA.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Jaye Panza, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 93943-5001, telephone: (831) 656-2514.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the meeting is to elicit the advice of the Board on the Naval Service's Postgraduate Education Program and the collaborative exchange and partnership between NPS and the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT). The Board examines the effectiveness with which the NPS is accomplishing its mission. To this end, the Board will inquire into the curricula; instruction; physical equipment; administration; state of morale of the student body, faculty, and staff; fiscal affairs; and any other matters relating to the operation of the NPS as the Board considers pertinent.

Individuals without a DoD government/CAC card require an escort at the meeting location. For access, information, or to send written comments regarding the NPS BOA contact Ms. Jaye Panza, Naval Postgraduate School, 1 University Circle, Monterey, CA 93943-5001 or by fax (831) 656-3145 by September 1, 2009.

Dated: July 21, 2009.

A.M. Vallandingham,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-17891 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 21, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11008

Conference Calendar

LESTER JON RUSTON

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

ALBERTO R GONZALES, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CV-1350

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lester Jon Ruston, federal prisoner # 26834-177, moves this court for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal following the dismissal without

prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Ruston’s motion is construed as a

challenge to the district court’s determination that the appeal is not taken in

good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). This court’s

inquiry into whether the appeal is taken in good faith “is limited to whether the
No. 06-11008

2

appeal involves ‘legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not

frivolous).’” Howard v. King, 707F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (citation omitted).

If the appeal is frivolous, this court may dismiss it sua sponte under 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24. 

Ruston has not shown thatthe district court erred in dismissing his § 2241

petition without prejudice. Ruston is not entitled to habeas relief based on

conclusional allegations that it is not possible to raise his claims in the pending

criminal case due to fraud and judicial and prosecutorial misconduct. See Koch

v. Puckett, 907 F.2d 524, 530 (5th Cir. 1990). Ruston’s request for IFP status is

denied, and his appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202

& n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Ruston’s motions for production, for contempt of court,

for judicial notice, and to disqualify the judges of this court are also denied. 

IFP DENIED; MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1




                      MOLECULAR DYNAMICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                           
                   STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                        (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                        
                                                         THREE MONTHS                   SIX MONTHS     
                                                             ENDED                         ENDED
                                                            JUNE 30,                      JUNE 30,
                                                      1997           1996           1997           1996    
                                                      ----           ----           ----           ----
<S>                                               <C>              <C>          <C>              <C>
Net income                                         $  1,532        $   630       $  2,592        $   917
                                                   --------        -------       --------        -------

Weighted average shares outstanding:
     Common stock                                    10,144         10,105         10,048         10,113
     Common stock equivalents - options               1,075            576          1,096            574
                                                   --------        -------       --------        -------
                                                     11,219         10,681         11,144         10,687
                                                   --------        -------       --------        -------

Earnings per share                                 $   0.14        $  0.06       $   0.23        $  0.09
                                                   --------        -------       --------        -------
                                                   --------        -------       --------        -------
</TABLE>

                                       2
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Greenfield Online, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 to be filed with Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E.
Bies, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
            Report.

Date: March 30, 2005                      By: /s/ Robert E. Bies
                                              ------------------
                                          Robert E. Bies
                                          Executive Vice-President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Greenfield Online, Inc. and will be retained by Greenfield Online,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,641
<SECURITIES>                                       882
<RECEIVABLES>                                  158,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,760
<INVENTORY>                                     67,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,227
<PP&E>                                       3,365,784
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,362,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,843,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          300,851
<BONDS>                                        837,725
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     79,708
<COMMON>                                       465,994
<OTHER-SE>                                     266,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,843,069
<SALES>                                      1,078,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,078,727
<CGS>                                          644,238
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  847,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                177,146
<INCOME-TAX>                                    64,526
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            112,620
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (275,426)
<NET-INCOME>                                 (162,806)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00<F1>
<FN>
<F1>*All common stock is owned by parent, no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

Co-Registrant (Commission File Number 000-30761):
UbiquiTel Inc.
One West Elm Street
Suite 400
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428
Co-Registrant (Commission File Number 333-39950):
UbiquiTel Operating Company
One West Elm Street
Suite 400
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel Operating Company on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James J. Volk, Chief Financial Officer of UbiquiTel Inc. and
UbiquiTel Operating Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of UbiquiTel Inc. and
UbiquiTel Operating Company.

| |  | UBIQUITEL INC.                                       
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/JAMES J. VOLKJames J. Volk
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | UBIQUITEL OPERATING COMPANY                          
| |  | /s/JAMES J. VOLKJames J. Volk
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | March 15, 2005                                       

---



QuickLinks
November 27, 1996


To the Board of Directors of
Capital Income Builder, Inc.

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Capital
Income Builder, Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended October 31, 1996, we
considered its internal control structure, including procedures for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purposes of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, and not to provide assurance on the
internal control structure.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining an
internal control structure.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and
judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and
related costs of internal control structure policies and procedures.  Two of
the objectives of an internal control structure are to provide management with
reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are appropriately
safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and that
transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and
recorded properly to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject to the risk that it
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the
effectiveness of the design and operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of the specific internal control structure elements does not reduce
to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts
that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving the internal control structure, including procedures for safeguarding
securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of
October 31, 1996.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management and
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: T.Z.W.T., A

MINOR

PETITION OF: S.T.W., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 280 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: T.Q.T.W., A

MINOR

PETITION OF: S.T.W., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 281 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.