alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.14


 


Director Compensation Arrangements



 


Compensation of Non-Employee Directors upon Initial Election
to the Board 


 


Upon the completion of this offering, all of our non-employee
directors will receive a non-qualified stock option to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock vesting one year from the date
of grant and granted on the date of the closing of this offering. In addition to the vesting conditions, these stock options will
not be exerciseable until the date that Harvard Bioscience no longer beneficially owns at least 50% of the total voting power of
our outstanding capital stock and will expire one year from the date of grant if such condition has not been satisfied. Each non-employee
that is elected to the our board of directors following the completion of the offering is entitled to receive a non-qualified stock
option to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock vesting one year from the date of grant and granted on the fifth business
day following his or her initial election to the board of directors.


 


Annual Compensation of Non-Employee Directors 


 


Each non-employee director also receives an annual retainer
of $30,000 paid in four equal quarterly installments. Each non-employee director is also entitled to receive a non-qualified stock
option to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock vesting one year from the date of grant and granted on the fifth business
day following our annual meeting of stockholders. Directors who are also our employees will receive no additional compensation
for service as a director.
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Inhibiton Therapeutics, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended January 31, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Henry Fong, President & Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
                Report.





/s/
                Henry FongHenry
                FongPrincipal
                Executive Officerand
              Principal
                Financial OfficerMay
                15, 2008




A
      signed original of this
      written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inhibiton
      Therapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by Inhibiton Therapeutics, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136795 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136795 

 COA: 282510 

Monroe CC: 77-016787-FY 

GAYLORD CLYDE WILSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

p1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     March 31,2000 10-QSB in it's entirety by referance to such financial
     statements
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         172,974
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,695,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                    44,699
<INVENTORY>                                    492,338
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,816,519
<PP&E>                                       9,843,379
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,944,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,148,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,903,710
<BONDS>                                      5,476,174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,016
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,765,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,148,010
<SALES>                                      3,290,826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,290,826
<CGS>                                        2,199,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,279,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               239,411
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,652
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             160,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (456,529)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (456,529)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (456,529)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.19)


</TABLE>
Advance copies of this statement are made available to the 

press under lock-up conditions with the explicit 

understanding that the data are embargoed until 8:30 a.m. 

Eastern Standard Time.

Statement of

Kathleen P. Utgoff

Commissioner

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Friday, April 1, 2005

Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 110,000 in 

March, and the unemployment rate declined to 5.2 percent. 

Over the year, payroll employment has risen by 2.1 million, 

and the unemployment rate has trended down from 5.7 

percent. 

Several industries continued to add jobs in March, 

notably construction, health care, and mining. In 

construction, employment rose by 26,000. Since its trough 

2 years earlier, employment in this industry has grown by 

nearly half a million. Most of this gain reflected

strength in the components of residential construction; 

however, employment in nonresidential specialty trade 

contracting also was up over the 2-year period (122,000). 

In the health care industry, employment continued to grow, 

increasing by 16,000 in March. Job growth was split 
2

equally among hospitals and ambulatory health care 

services. The mining industry added 5,000 jobs in March. 

In the past 5 months, mining employment has increased by 

22,000, largely in support activities for oil and gas 

operations.

Employment expanded in a few other industries over the 

month. Wholesale trade added 15,000 jobs. Employment 

continued to trend up in food services and in credit 

intermediation. 

In most other industries, employment was relatively 

flat over the month. Employment in both temporary help 

services and retail trade was little changed in March, 

after increasing in February. Manufacturing employment

also was little changed over the month; on net, the number 

of factory jobs is down slightly since last summer. 

Manufacturing hours edged down by one-tenth of an hour in 

March and factory overtime was down by two-tenths of an 

hour. 

Average hourly earnings of private production or 

nonsupervisory workers were up by 4 cents in March. Over 

the year, hourly earnings have increased by 2.6 percent.

Turning to measures from the household survey, both 

the number of unemployed persons, at 7.7 million, and the 

unemployment rate, at 5.2 percent, declined in March. Over 
3

the year, the unemployment rate has trended down from 5.7 

percent, reflecting declines in the jobless rates for adult 

men and adult women. The unemployment rate for teenagers 

was essentially unchanged over the year.

Labor force participation held steady at 65.8 percent 

over the month, and was little changed from a year earlier. 

The number of discouraged workers--persons who have given 

up searching for work--also was essentially unchanged over 

the year at about half a million. 

In summary, payroll employment rose by 110,000 in 

March, and the unemployment rate declined to 5.2 percent.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We have issued our reports dated February 24, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Qualys, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Qualys, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-184394, 333-193576, 333-202587, and 333-209735).








/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP





San Francisco, California


February 24, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 93 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 93

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of 
     initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

Mr. Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of 
     initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Labor Relations First Contract 
Negotiations Act of 2002''.

SEC. 2. INITIAL CONTRACT DISPUTES.

    Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h)(1) If, not later than 60 days after the certification of a 
new representative of employees for the purpose of collective 
bargaining, the employer of the employees and the representative have 
not reached a collective bargaining agreement with respect to the terms 
and conditions of employment, the employer and the representative shall 
jointly select a mediator to mediate those issues on which the employer 
and the representative cannot agree.
    ``(2) If the employer and the representative are unable to agree 
upon a mediator, either party may request the Federal Mediation and 
Conciliation Service to select a mediator and the Federal Mediation and 
Conciliation Service shall upon the request select a person to serve as 
mediator.
    ``(3) If, not later than 30 days after the date of the selection of 
a mediator under paragraph (1) or (2), the employer and the 
representative have not reached an agreement, the employer or the 
representative may transfer the matters remaining in controversy to the 
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service for binding arbitration.``.
                                 <all>
```
ex10-6.htm


EXHIBIT 10.6












Compensation Arrangements with Remer Y. Brinson, III







Neither Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. (“Company”), nor First Bank of Georgia (“Bank”), has a written employment agreement with Remer Y. Brinson, III, President and Chief Executive Officer of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. and First Bank of Georgia.  Mr. Brinson’s current (2013) salary is $309,750 and Mr. Brinson is eligible for an annual incentive award under the Bank’s Annual Incentive Plan, pursuant to which he received $106,200 for his performance in 2012.  See Exhibit 10.8 for a description of Mr. Brinson’s Annual Incentive Plan.  Mr. Brinson is eligible for stock option, restricted stock and other awards under the Company’s incentive plans as determined from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company.  In addition, Mr. Brinson participates in the Bank’s medical, dental, life and disability insurance plans and he may participate in the Company’s 401(k) plan.  Mr. Brinson also receives the following perquisites: payment of private and civic club membership dues, provision of an automobile and an automobile allowance.  The aggregate value of these perquisites in 2012 was less than $10,000.







Mr. Brinson entered into a Severance Protection Agreement with the Bank, which entitles him to certain payments following a change in control of the Company, as described in the Company’s annual proxy statements.  Mr. Brinson also participates in the Bank’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for key officers, which provides supplemental benefits upon retirement, termination of employment, death, disability or a change of control of the Bank, and is also described in the Company’s annual proxy statements.
Exhibit 10.19

                                RESOLUTION OF THE
                              BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
                             WATKINS-JOHNSON COMPANY




       WHEREAS,  it has been  proposed  (the  "Proposal")  that (i) all existing
       deferrals  of  compensation  under  the  Company's  1994  Top  Management
       Deferred  Compensation  Plan  ("Deferred  Compensation  Plan"),  (ii) all
       existing  deferrals of bonuses under the Company's  Annual Top Management
       Incentive  Bonus  Plans  ("Incentive  Bonus  Plans") and (iii) all future
       opportunities  to defer under such plans,  be eliminated  effective as of
       December 31, 1998,  and all existing  deferrals paid as soon as practical
       on or after January 1, 1999, and

       WHEREAS,  the Proposal has been submitted to the  Compensation  Committee
       and  approved  by the  Committee  for  submission  to the Board for final
       action, and

       WHEREAS, the Board deems that this action is in the best interests of the
       Company;

       NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,  that (i) the Deferred Compensation Plan be
       terminated  in accordance  with Section 9(a) of the Plan  effective as of
       December 31, 1998, (ii) the balance of all accounts on December 31, 1998,
       be paid as a lump  sum to all  participants  as soon as  practical  on or
       after  January 1, 1999,  and (iii) no future  deferrals  shall be allowed
       after December 31, 1998, and

       FURTHER RESOLVED,  that (i) all outstanding deferrals under all Incentive
       Bonus Plans for years on or before  1998 be  terminated  effective  as of
       December 31, 1998, (ii) as soon as practical on or after January 1, 1999,
       the  participants  be paid a lump sum  equal to the  balances  determined
       under the Plans on December 31, 1997, or December 31, 1998,  whichever is
       greater, and

       FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company are hereby authorized,
       directed and  empowered in the name of the Company,  to prepare,  execute
       and  deliver  all such  documents  and  instruments  and to take all such
       actions  in the name of the  Company as they deem  necessary,  advisable,
       convenient,  proper or  appropriate in order to carry out and perform the
       purposes of the foregoing resolutions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         342,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,044
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               475,275
<PP&E>                                       1,120,706
<DEPRECIATION>                                 107,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,425,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          176,201
<BONDS>                                      1,741,552
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          701,437
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           205
<OTHER-SE>                                    (185,198)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,425,755
<SALES>                                         21,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,786
<CGS>                                           13,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,731
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (173,263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (173,263)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (191,857)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (10.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (10.87)
        

</TABLE>
THEOPHILUS BESSELLIEU,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4508

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Steven B. Whittington, Judge.

Theophilus Bessellieu, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Charles Lee, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Theophilus Bessellieu, challenges the summary denial of his rule 

3.850 motion. In his brief, Bessellieu raised four issues. This Court affirms without 

further comment on three of the issues. However, Appellant’s argument that Ground 

One of his motion was not conclusively refuted by the portions of the record attached 

to the lower court’s order is found to have merit. The lower court’s attachment of an 
2

outdated Information has led us to this conclusion. We hereby reverse and remand 

with instruction to either attach portions of the record conclusively refuting

Appellant’s claim in Ground One, or to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine 

whether ineffective assistance of counsel was provided.

REVERSED and REMANDED for attachment of record evidence to the 

lower court’s order, or, in the event of the absence of such evidence, for an 

evidentiary hearing.

ROBERTS, C. J., WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, P.
L. Montesi, President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



/s/ P.L. Montesi
--------------------------------
P.L. Montesi
President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
November 13, 2003
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60169 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE ALLRED, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:96-CV-049-S

- - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * George Allred, federal prisoner # 08556042, seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the judgment of the district court dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion with prejudice. Allred’s contentions that 1) counsel was ineffectivein failing to argue that the Government violated the antishuttling provision of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA) and 2) that the district court violated the Due Process Clause by not adhering to the anti-shuttling policy present noNo. 97-60169 -2- legal points arguable on their merits. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). The provision did not apply to Allred because Mississippi had not enacted the IADA. See Birdwell v. Skeen , 983 F.2d 1332, 1335 (5th Cir. 1993). The motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The remaining motions are also DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ALVIN EUGENE TURNER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2704 

[March 21, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017-CF000377-AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. 

Hernandez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS AND LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.