Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 154 / Friday, August 11, 2017 / Notices 37563 

1See Petitioner’s Request for Administrative 

Review, dated February 24, 2017. 

2See ASPA’s Request for Administrative Review, 

dated February 28, 2017. 

3See VASEP’s Request for Administrative 

Review, dated February 27, 2017. See also Soc 

Trang Seafood Joint Stock Company’s Request for 

Administrative Review, dated February 22, 2017; 

Viet I-Mei Frozen Foods Co., Ltd.’s Request for 

Administrative Review, dated February 28, 2017. 

4See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 

17188 (April 10, 2017) (Initiation Notice). 

5See Soc Trang Seafood Joint Stock Company’s 

Submission, ‘‘Stapimex Withdrawal of Request for 

Review,’’ dated July 7, 2017. 

6See Petitioners’ Submission, ‘‘Domestic 

Producers’ Partial Withdrawal of Review Requests,’’ 

dated July 7, 2017; and ASPA’s Submission, 

‘‘Partial Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated July 7, 2017. 

7See ASPA’s Submission, ‘‘Partial Withdrawal of 

Review Requests,’’ dated July 10, 2017; and 

Petitioner’s Submission, ‘‘Partial Withdrawal of 

Review Requests,’’ dated July 10, 2017. 

8See Quoc Viet Seaproducts Processing Trading 

and Import-Export Co., Ltd. and Viet I-Mei Frozen 

Foods Co., Ltd.’s Submissions, ‘‘Partial Withdrawal 

of Review Requests,’’ dated July 10, 2017. 

9Quoc Viet Seaproducts Processing Trading and 

Import-Export Co., Ltd., and Quoc Viet Seaproducts 

Processing Trade and Import-Export Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Quoc Viet Co. Ltd.’’); Seavina Joint Stock 

Company; Soc Trang Seafood Joint Stock Company 

(‘‘STAPIMEX’’); Viet I-Mei Frozen Foods Co., Ltd., 

and Viet I-Mei Frozen Foods Co. Ltd (‘‘Viet I-Mei’’). 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 751 of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: August 7, 2017. 

James Maeder, 

Senior Director performing the duties of 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2017–16992 Filed 8–10–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–802] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2016–2017 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is rescinding the 

administrative review, in part, of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) 

for the period February 1, 2016 through 

January 31, 2017. 

DATES: Applicable August 11, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 10, 2017, based on timely 

requests for review of 55 companies by 

the Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action 

Committee (the petitioner) 1 and of 88 

companies by the American Shrimp 

Processors Association (ASPA) 2 and 

various Vietnamese companies,3 the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from Vietnam 

covering the period February 1, 2016, 

through January 31, 2017.4

On July 7, 2017, Soc Trang Seafood 

Joint Stock Company withdrew its 

request for administrative review.5 On 

July 7, 2017, the petitioner and ASPA 

withdrew their respective requests for 

an administrative review of Soc Trang 

Seafood Joint Stock Company and its 

various name iterations, as were listed 

in the Initiation Notice.6 Subsequently, 

on July 10, 2017, the petitioner and 

ASPA also withdrew their respective 

requests for administrative review of 

Quoc Viet Seaproducts Processing 

Trading and Import-Export Co., Ltd., 

Viet I-Mei Frozen Foods Co., Ltd., and 

Seavina Joint Stock Company and their 

various name iterations, as were listed 

in the Initiation Notice.7 On July 10, 

2017, Quoc Viet Seaproducts Processing 

Trading and Import-Export Co., Ltd. and 

Viet I-Mei Frozen Foods Co., Ltd. 

withdrew their respective requests for 

an administrative review; there are no 

remaining review requests on the record 

with respect to these companies.8

Additionally, because Seavina Joint 

Stock Company did not request a review 

of itself, there are no remaining review 

requests for Seavina Joint Stock 

Company. 

Partial Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested the 

review withdraws its request within 90 

days of the publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. 

Because the petitioner, ASPA, and the 

individual companies all withdrew their 

requests for administrative review 

within 90 days of the date of publication 

of the Initiation Notice, and no other 

interested party requested a review of 

these companies, the Department is 

rescinding this review with respect to 

these companies, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(1).9 The administrative 

review remains active with respect to all 

other companies for whom a review was 

initiated. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries at a rate equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, during the period 

February 1, 2016, through January 31, 

2017, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, if appropriate. 

Notifications 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
37564 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 154 / Friday, August 11, 2017 / Notices 

1See Memorandum, ‘‘Final Scope Ruling 

Concerning the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Glycine from the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

dated December 3, 2012 (Final Scope Ruling) at 14. 

2See Glycine from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Partial Affirmative Determination of 

Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order, 77 

FR 73426 (December 10, 2012) (Circumvention 

Notice) and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Determination of the 

Anti-Circumvention Inquiry of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Glycine from the People’s Republic 

of China; see also Antidumping Duty Order: Glycine 

from the People’s Republic of China, 60 FR 16116 

(March 29, 1995) (Order); see also Final Scope 

Ruling. 

3See Circumvention Notice and Final Scope 

Ruling. 

4See Circumvention Notice. 

5See Letter, ‘‘Glycine from the People’s Republic 

of China: Request for Changed Circumstances 

Review,’’ dated July 18, 2016. 

6 Id. 

7See Glycine from the People’s Republic of 

China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 81 FR 81064 (November 17, 

2016). 

8 In separate scope rulings, the Department 

determined that: (a) D(-) Phenylglycine Ethyl Dane 

Salt is outside the scope of the order and (b) PRCglycine exported from India remains the same class 

or kind of merchandise as the PRC-origin glycine 

imported into India. See Notice of Scope Rulings 

and Anticircumvention Inquiries, 62 FR 62288 

(November 21, 1997) and Circumvention Notice, 

respectively. 

9See Order. 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review of Glycine from the 

People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently 

with this determination and hereby adopted by this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: August 7, 2017. 

James Maeder, 

Senior Director performing the duties of 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2017–16996 Filed 8–10–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–836] 

Glycine From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 17, 2016, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated a changed 

circumstances review (CCR) of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

the People’s Republic of China (PRC). 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that Salvi Chemical 

Industries Ltd. (Salvi) is eligible to 

participate in a certification process, 

because Salvi has demonstrated that 

glycine produced by Salvi is no longer 

processed from Chinese-origin glycine. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective August 11, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Madeline Heeren, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–9179. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 10, 2012, the 

Department published its final anticircumvention inquiry determination, 

where the record indicated that Salvi 

was processing Chinese glycine and 

labeling it to be of Indian origin.1 The 

Department determined that glycine 

processed in India of Chinese origin 

does not change country of origin, and, 

therefore, Salvi had circumvented the 

Order.2 As part of our determination, we 

stated that Salvi could not take part in 

a certification process, whereby Salvi’s 

importers could certify that they had not 

imported Chinese-origin glycine and 

would not be subject to the antidumping 

duty rate for Chinese glycine.3

Additionally, we stated that Salvi could 

also request a CCR if it could show that 

its exports of glycine to the United 

States were not processed from Chineseorigin glycine.4 On July 18, 2016, the 

Department received a request from 

Salvi to initiate a CCR in order for the 

Department to determine that the 

glycine produced by Salvi is no longer 

processed from Chinese-origin glycine.5

Additionally, Salvi requested that the 

Department determine that importers of 

glycine from Salvi are eligible to 

participate in a certification process.6

On November 16, 2017, the Department 

initiated this CCR, pursuant to section 

751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, (the Act) and 19 CFR 

351.216(d), upon finding that there is 

sufficient information to warrant a 

review of the Order.7

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this 

antidumping duty order is glycine, 

which is a free-flowing crystalline 

material, like salt or sugar. Glycine is 

produced at varying levels of purity and 

is used as a sweetener/taste enhancer, a 

buffering agent, reabsorbable amino 

acid, chemical intermediate, and a metal 

complexing agent. This proceeding 

includes glycine of all purity levels. 

Glycine is currently classified under 

subheading 2922.49.4020 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS).8 Although the 

HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

under the order is dispositive.9

Methodology 

We are conducting this CCR in 

accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the 

Act. For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.10 A list of 

topics in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. 

The Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is made available to the public via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov, and is available to all 

parties in the Department’s Central 

Records Unit, room B8024 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum and 

the electronic version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Preliminary Results of the Changed 

Circumstances Review 

We preliminarily determine that, 

since the Circumvention Notice and 

Final Scope Ruling were issued, Salvi 

has demonstrated that glycine produced 

by Salvi is no longer processed from 

Chinese-origin glycine. 

If the Department upholds these 

preliminary results in the final results, 

we will notify U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection and allow Salvi’s importers 

of subject merchandise to certify that 

the glycine being produced and 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES