alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) |  | the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Paul Walker





Paul Walker

Chief Executive Officer



Dated: March 27, 2003



1
[910 NYS2d 837]

#### Alphonse Hotel Corp., Doing Business as Hotel Carter, Respondent, v Destiny Roseboom, Respondent. Calabro & Associates, P.C., Nonparty Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

September 17, 2010

*35APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Law Office of Jonathan Weinberger,*New York City, for *Alphonse Hotel Corp.,*respondent. *Destiny Roseboom,*respondent pro se.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order, dated March 19, 2010, affirmed, with $10 costs.

Although Civil Court has limited subject matter jurisdiction and narrow equitable powers *(see generally Priel v Linarello,*7 Misc 3d 64 [2005]; *European-American Banking Corp. v Chock Full O’Nuts Corp.,*109 Misc 2d 615 [1981]), trial courts have a well established, inherent authority to control the attorneys appearing before them and to compel such attorneys to act fairly towards their clients *(see Leviten v Sandbank,*291 NY 352, 357 [1943]). One component of this inherent authority is the right to supervise the charging of fees for legal services *(see Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone,*85 NY2d 518 [1995]; *Matter of First Natl. Bank of E. Islip v Brower,*42 NY2d 471 [1977]); a related component of this authority is the power to require an attorney, under certain circumstances, to turn over to a client the client’s file maintained by the attorney, even if the attorney asserts that the file serves as a retaining lien *(see Leviten, supra; Matter of Johnson [Makames],*238 App Div 534 [1933]).

Here, Civil Court had subject matter jurisdiction over the underlying summary holdover proceeding, and the inherent authority both to supervise nonparty appellant law firm’s charging of fees for legal services rendered to its former client, petitioner landlord, and to require nonparty appellant to turn over the case file it maintained for its former client to the former client’s substitute counsel. We note, too, that “[i]n the exercise of its jurisdiction^] [Civil Court] shall have all of the powers that supreme court would have in like actions and proceedings” (CCA 212; *see 952 Assoc., LLC v Palmer,*52 AD3d 236 [2008]), and it is well-settled that Supreme Court has inherent authority to supervise the fees attorneys charge for legal services in any action or proceeding before it *(see Matter of Stortecky,*85 NY2d at 525-526).

With respect to nonparty appellant’s assertion that the court erred in concluding that nonparty appellant forfeited any right *36to a retaining lien, the record establishes that nonparty appellant’s representation of petitioner landlord terminated due to “unjustified abandonment” of the former client (see *Klein v Eubank, 87*NY2d 459, 464 [1996]). We note in this connection that nonparty appellant did not comply with the requirements of CPLR 321 (b) governing the substitution of counsel prior to its abandonment of representation of petitioner landlord. Therefore, Civil Court correctly concluded that nonparty appellant forfeited any right to a retaining lien on the case file *(see generally Matter of Nazario v Ciafone,*65 AD3d 1240 [2009]).

McKeon, EJ., Shulman and Hunter, Jr., JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alberto AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-20117

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Alberto Aguirre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Aguirre has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. *401Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated March 16, 2009, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Orchid Cellmark Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Orchid Cellmark Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-60582, effective May 18, 2001, File No. 333-85550, effective April 16, 2002, File No. 333-98825,effective September 9, 2002, and File No. 333-105732, effective June 5, 2003) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-53118, effective January 3, 2001, File No. 333-76744, effective January 15, 2002, FileNo. 333-126227, effective June 29, 2005, and File No. 333-146002, effective September 12, 2007). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

New York, New York 

March 16, 2009
**Exhibit
      13.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Efrat
      Makov, as Chief Financial Officer of Alvarion Ltd. (the “Company”), certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §  1350,
      as
      adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:




(1)
      The
      accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December
      31,
      2007 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      April 2, 2008


/s/
              Efrat
              MakovEfrat
              MakovChief Financial
              Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,084,000
<SECURITIES>                                33,623,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,640,000
<PP&E>                                      11,833,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,429,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,799,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,533,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       108,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,829,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,799,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               214,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,503,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,704,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,704,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,704,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
#### United States *v.*Kelly, Adm’x.

*(District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.*

May 4, 1886.)

Butler, J.

For the reasons given in the opinion this day filed in *D. 8.*v. *Trucks’ Adm’r, ante,*541, judgment must he entered for the defendant on the verdict. While this case arises under the subsequent statute of 1866, the facts found do not bring the defendant within the provision creating personal liability.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Wang Guoliang, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of PetroChina Company Limited
(the "Company");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
     annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
     and

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
     over financial reporting.


Date: June 28, 2004

                                                  /s/  Wang Guoliang
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name:  Wang Guoliang
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Shopping.com Ltd.
(the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel T. Ciporin, Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated: March 22, 2005



By:

/s/    DANIEL T. CIPORINDaniel T. Ciporin Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**Certification of the ChiefFinancial Officer**

(Pursuant to Rule13a-14(a))

I, Gary Williams, certifythat:

1.               I have reviewedthis Form 10-Q of Focus Enhancements, Inc.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2006

 
|   | /s/ Gary Williams                |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   |                             |
|   | Gary Williams                    |
|   | Executive VP of  Finance and CFO |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,493
<SECURITIES>                                    15,916
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,167
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,309
<PP&E>                                           1,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,203
<SALES>                                          3,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,178
<CGS>                                              253
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (62)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (450)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (450)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 747

To improve the Telecommunications Development Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2003

Mr. TOWNS (for himself, Mr. UPTON, and Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL

To improve the Telecommunications Development Fund.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telecommunications 

5 Development Fund Improvement Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT FUND. 

7 (a) DEPOSITS AND USE OF AUCTION ESCROW AC8 COUNTS.—Section 309(j)(8) of the Communications Act 

9 of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(8)) is amended—

10 (1) in subparagraph (C)—
2

•HR 747 IH 

1 (A) by striking ‘‘DEPOSIT AND USE OF

2 AUCTION ESCROW ACCOUNTS’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘DEPOSITS AND USE OF AUCTION ESCROW AC4 COUNTS FOR UP-FRONT PAYMENTS’’; AND

5 (B) by striking ‘‘deposits’’ each place it ap6 pears and inserting ‘‘up-front payments’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end thereof the following 

8 new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(D) DEPOSITS AND USE OF AUCTION ES10 CROW ACCOUNTS FOR DOWN PAYMENTS.—Any 

11 down payment that the Commission may re12 quire any bidder to submit before issuance of a 

13 license or permit in a system of competitive bid14 ding pursuant to this subsection shall be depos15 ited in an interest-bearing account at a finan16 cial institution designated for purposes of this 

17 subsection by the Commission (after consulta18 tion with the Secretary of the Treasury). With19 in 45 days following the issuance of a license or 

20 permit—

21 ‘‘(i) the down payments of successful 

22 bidders shall be paid to the Treasury; and 

23 ‘‘(ii) the interest accrued to the ac24 count shall be transferred to the Tele-
3

•HR 747 IH 

1 communications Development Fund estab2 lished pursuant to section 714.’’

3 (b) LENDING AND CREDIT OPERATIONS.—Section 

4 714(f) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 

5 614(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘the Federal Credit Re6 form Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and any other’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘any’’. 

8 (c) REGULATIONS.—Within 60 days after the date of 

9 the enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications 

10 Commission shall make such modifications to its rules as 

11 are necessary to carry out the amendments made by this 

12 section. 

13 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply only to spectrum license auctions 

15 initiated by the Federal Communications Commission on 

16 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. Nothing 

17 in this Section shall affect the down payments of any suc18 cessful bidder in the Federal Communications Commis19 sion’s C and F block broadband personal communications 

20 service spectrum auction, also referred to as ‘‘auction 35’’, 

21 or the claim of any person to any entitlement to interest 

22 on any such down payment upon return of such down pay23 ment to such person for any reason.

Æ