alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2008 of Stein Mart, Inc. (the Form 10-Q), I, Linda M. Farthing, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: December 10, 2008 |  | /s/ Linda M. Farthing                
|                        |  | Linda M. Farthing                    
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



19
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-KSB

 

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005

 

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission File Number: 0-7775

 

WESTLAND DEVELOPMENT CO.,INC.

(Exact name of Westland as specified inits charter)

 

NewMexico                                                                                                                          85-0165021

(State or other jurisdictionof                                                                                           I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or otherorganization)                                                                               IdentificationNo.)

 

401 CoorsBoulevard, N.W.,Albuquerque, NewMexico,                                                 87121

(Address of principal executiveoffices)                                                                             (Zip Code)

 

Westland's telephone number, including area code:505-831-9600

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of theAct: None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of theAct:

 

No Par Value Common Stock

(Title of Class)

 

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports requiredto be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months(or for such shorter period that Westland was required to file such reports),and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]

 

Check if disclosure of delinquent filers in response toItem 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure willbe contained, to the best of Westland's knowledge, in definitive proxy orinformation statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSBor any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X]

 

State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year:$23,202,901

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting stockheld by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the stock wassold, or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of a specified datewithin the past 60 days. On September 28, 2005, there were 701,623 No Par ValueCommon shares and 41,700 Class B shares owned by non-affiliates. The last dateany stock was bought or sold August 25, 2005 and the price on that day was$20 per share. Thus the aggregate market value of the voting stock held bynon-affiliates on September 28, 2005, was $13,868,380.

 

The number of shares outstanding of each of Westland's classes ofcommon stock, as of September 28, 2005, was: No Par Value Common:709,828 shares; Class B $1.00 Par Value: 85,100 shares.

 

No documents, other than exhibits, are incorporatedherein by reference.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormac k
David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein
Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement,
Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

May 2, 2018 

# Order

Clerk May 2, 2018

157221(56)

STATE TREASURER, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 157221 v COA: 336202 Emmet CC: 16-105277-CZ MICHAEL A. KENNEDY, Defendant-Appellant, and

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and OFFICE OF RETIREMENT SERVICES, Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Justice, t he motion of defendant-appella nt to extend the time for filing his reply is GRANTED . The reply will be accepted fo r filing if submitted on or before May 23, 2018.
[No. 54877-8-I.

Division One.

October 24, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Joseph Noel Anderson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Whatcom County, No. 03-1-01264-8, Michael F. Moynihan, J., entered August 4, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
53. Certification and licensing status of the employed by occupation, 2015 annual averages

[Numbers in thousands]

Percent distribution

With a certification or license1

Total

With a 

certification, 

but no 

license

With a 

license2

Total, 16 years and over 148,834 100.0 25.5 3.1 22.4 74.5

 Management, professional, and related occupations 57,960 100.0 37.6 4.2 33.4 62.4

 Management, business, and financial operations occupations 24,108 100.0 23.5 4.0 19.5 76.5

 Management occupations 16,994 100.0 23.3 4.0 19.3 76.7

 Business and financial operations occupations 7,114 100.0 23.8 4.0 19.8 76.2

 Professional and related occupations 33,852 100.0 47.7 4.4 43.3 52.3

 Computer and mathematical occupations 4,369 100.0 15.8 8.5 7.3 84.2

 Architecture and engineering occupations 2,954 100.0 26.6 4.6 22.0 73.4

 Life, physical, and social science occupations 1,404 100.0 27.2 4.2 23.0 72.8

 Community and social services occupations 2,596 100.0 39.7 5.6 34.1 60.3

 Legal occupations 1,803 100.0 68.1 4.4 63.6 31.9

 Education, training, and library occupations 8,908 100.0 55.5 2.1 53.4 44.5

 Arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media occupations 3,051 100.0 10.8 2.9 7.9 89.2

 Healthcare practitioners and technical occupations 8,766 100.0 76.9 4.7 72.2 23.1

 Service occupations 25,896 100.0 22.8 2.3 20.5 77.2

 Healthcare support occupations 3,514 100.0 51.8 4.8 47.0 48.2

 Protective service occupations 3,109 100.0 40.0 2.4 37.6 60.0

 Food preparation and serving related occupations 8,142 100.0 8.2 1.2 6.9 91.8

 Building and grounds cleaning and maintenance occupations 5,716 100.0 7.9 1.1 6.8 92.1

 Personal care and service occupations 5,415 100.0 31.9 3.7 28.2 68.1

 Sales and office occupations 33,598 100.0 13.1 1.9 11.2 86.9

 Sales and related occupations 15,700 100.0 16.2 2.1 14.1 83.8

 Office and administrative support occupations 17,897 100.0 10.3 1.7 8.6 89.7

 Natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations 13,733 100.0 21.3 3.7 17.5 78.7

 Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations 1,073 100.0 8.0 0.5 7.4 92.0

 Construction and extraction occupations 7,652 100.0 20.4 2.5 17.9 79.6

 Installation, maintenance, and repair occupations 5,008 100.0 25.4 6.3 19.2 74.6

 Production, transportation, and material moving occupations 17,647 100.0 16.6 2.1 14.4 83.4

 Production occupations 8,522 100.0 10.9 2.4 8.5 89.1

 Transportation and material moving occupations 9,125 100.0 22.0 1.9 20.0 78.0

1 A person may have more than one certification or license.

2 Persons with a license may also have a certification.

NOTE: Certifications are issued by a non-governmental certification body and convey that an individual has the knowledge or skill 

to perform a specific job. A license is awarded by a government agency and conveys a legal authority to work in an occupation. 

Occupation Total 

employed

Without a 

certification 

or license

Total 

employed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             798                       8
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,228                     971
<ALLOWANCES>                                        48                      35
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,789                   1,975
<PP&E>                                           1,622                   1,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                     473                     415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,139                  16,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,605                   1,549
<BONDS>                                          2,506                   3,236
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           734                     718
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,320                   7,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,139                  16,715
<SALES>                                          6,805                   5,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,805                   5,367
<CGS>                                            4,373                   3,483
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,373                   3,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,950                   1,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 370                     386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    155                    (59)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       161                      73
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (12)                   (131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                     680
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (9)                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (21)                     549
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)                     .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)                     .84
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2009 of Stein Mart, Inc. (the Form 10-Q), I, David H. Stovall, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: December 9, 2009 |  | /s/ David H. Stovall, Jr.            
|                       |  | David H. Stovall, Jr.                
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



17
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 
 REVISED 2012 BONUS COMPENSATION PLAN FOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT 
 RATIFIED BY
THE BOARD MAY 3, 2012 
  

	•	 	 Eligible Executives (6): CEO, CMO, CFO, SVP-GMs (2) and SVP-Business Development. 



 

	•	 	 Bonus pool is funded by achievement of payout targets and maximum achievement, with pro-rata payment for achievement with a floor of 95% of revenue
targets and 80% of operating profit targets as noted in tables below. 


  

	•	 	 Bonus target payouts based on a percentage of base salary. 



 

	•	 	 Bonus are weighted 30% for the first half of the year and paid at close of audited review following Q2 and are weighted 70% for the second half of the
year and paid at the close of audited financials following Q4. 


  

	•	 	 Payout to eligible executives will be based 60% on consolidated revenue and 40% on non-GAAP income from operations for all but SVPs where it will be
based 60% on net revenue for the relevant CafePress business lines and 40% on non-GAAP income from operations for that same business line. The SVP-Business Development had additional MBOs applied to his targets. 



The Objective Targets against which bonus compensation award will be determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

  

					
	CEO:	  	60% target, 90% max	  	
	CFO:	  	50% target, 75% max	  	
	CMO:	  	40% target, 60% max	  	
	SVP-GM:	  	25% target, 35% max	  	
	SVP-Business Development:	  	25% target, 35% max
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 892 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 892

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out a project for flood 
  damage reduction and ecosystem restoration for the American River, 
            Sacramento, California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2003

     Mr. Matsui (for himself, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. George Miller of 
 California, and Mr. Thompson of California) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out a project for flood 
  damage reduction and ecosystem restoration for the American River, 
            Sacramento, California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sacramento Public Safety Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AMERICAN 
              RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary of the Army is authorized to carry out the project 
for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, American River, 
Sacramento, California, substantially in accordance with the plans, and 
subject to the conditions, described in the Report of the Chief of 
Engineers for the project dated November 5, 2002.

SEC. 3. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT BRIDGE ADJACENT TO FOLSOM DAM.

    (a) In General.--As part of the project authorized by section 2, 
the Secretary of Transportation shall carry out a project to design and 
construct a bridge west of and adjacent to Folsom Dam, California. In 
carrying out the project, the Secretary shall also construct necessary 
linkages from the bridge to existing roadways.
    (b) Design and Construction.--In designing and constructing the 
bridge, the Secretary shall--
            (1) coordinate with the Secretary of the Army regarding the 
        project authorized by section 2; and
            (2) provide appropriate sizing and linkages to support 
        present and future traffic flow requirements for the city of 
        Folsom, California.
    (c) Grant Assistance.--The Secretary of Transportation shall make a 
grant to the State of California in an amount sufficient to pay not 
less than 80 percent of the cost of the project authorized by this 
section.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Focus  Enhancements,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Brett
Moyer, President,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Brett A. Moyer
-----------------
Brett A. Moyer
Chief Executive Officer
May 7, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Everett R. Whalen, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 482]

Cardona, P.J.

As a result of defendant’s sexual relationship with one of his biological daughters, he was convicted in May 2002 of two counts of rape in the third degree, two counts of sodomy in the third degree and incest, and sentenced to a period of incarceration. In connection with that sentence, a permanent order of protection was entered pursuant to CPL 530.12 prohibiting defendant from contacting, among others, the victim and her “other and immediate family,” until May 2013. Once incarcerated, defendant began corresponding with the victim’s half sister, who is defendant’s younger biological daughter by a different mother. That daughter, with the assistance of her mother, thereafter began visiting defendant in prison until correction officials became concerned that he was grooming her to be his next victim. Citing the order of protection, correction officials then denied defendant further contact with the victim’s half sibling. Shortly thereafter, defendant brought a motion seeking to have the order of protection modified to allow such contact. County Court denied that motion and defendant appeals from the order entered thereon.

The instant appeal must be dismissed. As the Court of Appeals has noted, “a defendant’s right to appeal within the criminal procedure universe is purely statutory” *(People v Stevens,*91 NY2d 270, 278 [1998]) and, therefore, is “strictly limited” *(People v Bautista,*7 NY3d 838, 839 [2006]). While “a permanent order of protection issued at the conclusion of a criminal action is appealable as part of the judgment of conviction” *917
      *(People v Konieczny,*2 NY3d 569, 572 [2004]; *see People v Nieves, 2*NY3d 310, 315 [2004]; *see also*CPL 450.10),* the instant appeal involves a separate order denying a motion for modification made over four years after that judgment. Given that the subject order does not fit within the statutory authorization for appeals as of right to this Court contained within CPL 450.10, we conclude that it cannot be maintained.

Mercure, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

Although the Court of Appeals’ decision in *People v Nieves (supra)*specifically considered permanent orders of protection for nonfamily members issued pursuant to CPL 530.13, we find no basis to conclude that its determination as to appealability would not also apply to orders of protection issued in favor of family members pursuant to CPL 530.12 *(see*Preiser, 2004 Supp Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 11 A, CPL 530.12, 2008 Cum Pocket Part, at 31).
1 The Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-2989

___________ Joe Thomas; Cheri Thomas, * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Ford Motor Company; TRW, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 7, 2005 Filed: October 6, 2005

___________ Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Joe and Cheri Thomas (Thomases) appeal the district court’s 1 adverse entry of judgment following a trial in their diversity products-liability action. The only issue on appeal is whether the district court properly submitted to the jury the issue of contributory negligence on the part of a nonparty, the City of Mayflower, Arkansas (Mayflower).-2- Before trial the Thomases stipulated that the issue of Mayflower’s fault would be submitted to the jury so the jury could compare Mayflower’s fault to any fault for which the jury held defendants responsible. During trial the Thomases raised concerns with the legality of the stipulation agreement, but they ultimately agreed to submit the issue of Mayflower’s fault to the jury and agreed to the related special interrogatory, and they thus have waived appellate review. SeeStarks v. Rent-ACenter , 58 F.3d 358, 361-62 (8th Cir. 1995) (it is fundamental that where party invited error, there can be no reversible error); cf. Porterco, Inc. v. Igloo Prods. Corp. , 955 F.2d 1164, 1173 (8th Cir. 1992) (where no specific objections are made to district court’s decision to submit issue to jury, party waives appellate review of ruling). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 23.1

[LETTERHEAD]

CONSENT OF H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

We hereby consent to the use of the name H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. and of references to H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. and to inclusion of and
reference to our reports, or information contained therein, dated January 31, 2003, February 17, 2004, and March 4, 2005, prepared for Whittier Energy Corporation in the Whittier
Energy Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004.

| |  | H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.               
| |  | ---------------------------------------------
| |  | by:                                          
| |  | Sylvia Castilleja, P.E. Senior Vice President

December 7,
2005
Houston, Texas

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-108570, 333-111525 and 333-115832), on Form S-4 (File No. 333-32446) and on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-42598, 333-42596, 333-42594, and 333-124265) of Curis, Inc. of our reportdated March 9, 2006 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in thisForm 10-K. 

/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 31, 2006
# table14full14

&8Page &P of &N