37168 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 

paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(a) and by adding 

new paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(b) as follows: 

§ 314.81 Other postmarketing reports. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(2) * * * 

(ii) * * * 

(b) Authorized generic drugs. If 

applicable, the date each authorized 

generic drug (as defined in § 314.3) 

entered the market, the date each 

authorized generic drug ceased being 

distributed, and the corresponding trade 

or brand name. Each dosage form and/ 

or strength is a different authorized 

generic drug and should be listed 

separately. The first annual report 

submitted on or after January 25, 2010 

must include the information listed in 

this paragraph for any authorized 

generic drug that was marketed during 

the time period covered by an annual 

report submitted after January 1, 1999. 

If information is included in the annual 

report with respect to any authorized 

generic drug, a copy of that portion of 

the annual report must be sent to the 

Food and Drug Administration, Center 

for Drug Evaluation and Research, 

Office of New Drug Quality Assessment, 

Bldg. 21, rm. 2562, 10903 New 

Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 

20993–0002, and marked ‘‘Authorized 

Generic Submission’’ or, by e-mail, to 

the Authorized Generics electronic 

mailbox at 

AuthorizedGenerics@fda.hhs.gov with 

‘‘Authorized Generic Submission’’ 

indicated in the subject line. However, 

at such time that FDA has required that 

annual reports be submitted in an 

electronic format, the information 

required by this paragraph must be 

submitted as part of the annual report, 

in the electronic format specified for 

submission of annual reports at that 

time, and not as a separate submission 

under the preceding sentence in this 

paragraph. 

* * * * * 

Dated: April 7, 2009. 

Jeffrey Shuren, 

Associate Commissioner for Policy and 

Planning. 

[FR Doc. E9–17963 Filed 7–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160–01–S 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2009–0303(a); FRL–8936– 

2] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; South Carolina; 

Transportation Conformity 

Memorandum of Agreement Update 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve a revision to the South 

Carolina State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) submitted on November 28, 2008, 

through the South Carolina Department 

of Health and Environmental Control 

(SC DHEC). This revision consists of 

transportation conformity criteria and 

procedures related to interagency 

consultation and enforceability of 

certain transportation-related control 

measures and mitigation measures. The 

intended effect of this approval is to 

update the transportation conformity 

criteria and procedures in the South 

Carolina SIP. 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

September 28, 2009 without further 

notice, unless EPA receives adverse 

comment by August 27, 2009. If EPA 

receives such comments, it will publish 

a timely withdrawal of the direct final 

rule in the Federal Register and inform 

the public that the rule will not take 

effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2009–0303, by one of the 

following methods: 

a. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

b. E-mail: Wood.amanetta@epa.gov. 

c. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

d. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2009–0303, 

Air Quality Modeling and 

Transportation Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

e. Hand Delivery or Courier: Amanetta 

Wood, Air Quality Modeling and 

Transportation Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal 

holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2009– 

0303. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail, 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The http:// 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

http://www.regulations.gov index. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Quality Modeling and 

Transportation Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 37169 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amanetta Wood, Air Quality Modeling 

and Transportation Section, Air 

Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. 

Wood’s telephone number is 404–562– 

9025. She can also be reached via 

electronic mail at 

Wood.amanetta@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Transportation Conformity 

II. Background for This Action 

A. Federal Requirements 

B. York County Conformity SIP 

III. State Submittal and EPA Evaluation 

IV. Public Comment and Final Action 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Transportation Conformity 

Transportation conformity (hereafter 

referred to as ‘‘conformity’’) is required 

under section 176(c) of the Clean Air 

Act (‘‘CAA’’ or ‘‘Act’’) to ensure that 

Federally supported highway, transit 

projects, and other activities are 

consistent with (‘‘conform to’’) the 

purpose of the SIP. Conformity 

currently applies to areas that are 

designated nonattainment, and to areas 

that have been redesignated to 

attainment after 1990 (maintenance 

areas) with plans developed under 

section 175A of the Act, for the 

following transportation related criteria 

pollutants: Ozone, particulate matter 

(e.g., PM2.5 and PM10), carbon 

monoxide, and nitrogen dioxide. 

Conformity to the purpose of the SIP 

means that transportation activities will 

not cause new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the relevant criteria 

pollutants, also known as national 

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). 

The conformity regulation is found in 

40 CFR part 93 and provisions related 

to conformity SIPs are found in 40 CFR 

51.390. 

II. Background for This Action 

A. Federal Requirements 

EPA promulgated the Federal 

transportation conformity criteria and 

procedures (‘‘Conformity Rule’’) on 

November 24, 1993 (58 FR 62188). 

Among other things, the rule required 

States to address all provisions of the 

conformity rule in their SIPs frequently 

referred to as ‘‘conformity SIPs.’’ Under 

40 CFR 51.390, most sections of the 

conformity rule were required to be 

copied verbatim. States were also 

required to tailor all or portions of the 

following three sections of the 

conformity rule to meet their State’s 

individual circumstances: 40 CFR 

93.105, which addresses consultation 

procedures; 40 CFR 93.122(a)(4)(ii), 

which addresses written commitments 

to control measures that are not 

included in a metropolitan planning 

organization’s (MPO’s) transportation 

plan and transportation improvement 

program that must be obtained prior to 

a conformity determination, and the 

requirement that such commitments, 

when they exist, must be fulfilled; and 

40 CFR 93.125(c), which addresses 

written commitments to mitigation 

measures that must be obtained prior to 

a project-level conformity 

determination, and the requirement that 

project sponsors must comply with such 

commitments, when they exist. 

On August 10, 2005, the ‘‘Safe, 

Accountable, Flexible, Efficient 

Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for 

Users’’ (SAFETEA–LU) was signed into 

law. SAFETEA–LU revised section 

176(c) of the CAA transportation 

conformity provisions. One of the 

changes streamlines the requirements 

for conformity SIPs. Under SAFETEA– 

LU, States are required to address and 

tailor only three sections of the rule in 

their conformity SIPs: 40 CFR 93.105, 40 

CFR 93.122(a)(4)(ii), and, 40 CFR 

93.125(c), described above. In general, 

States are no longer required to submit 

conformity SIP revisions that address 

the other sections of the conformity 

rule. These changes took effect on 

August 10, 2005, when SAFETEA–LU 

was signed into law. 

B. South Carolina Transportation 

Conformity SIP 

Effective June 15, 2004, EPA 

designated Rock Hill, a portion of York 

County, as a nonattainmnet area for the 

1997 8-hour ozone standard as part of 

the bi-State Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock 

Hill NC-SC nonattainment area. The 

current designation status for the biState Charlotte-Rock Hill Area for the 

1997 8-hour ozone standard is 

nonattainment. See, 40 CFR 81 for more 

information on designations. 

The Rock Hill-Fort Mill Area Transit 

Study (RFATS) is the MPO for the entire 

portion of York County that is included 

in the 1997 8-hour ozone area. Per the 

Transportation Conformity Rule, the 

MPO’s conformity determination is not 

complete without a regional analysis 

that considers the projects in the MPO 

area. For the purposes of 8-hour 

conformity, the RFATS MPO serves as 

the lead agency for the preparation, 

consultation, and distribution of the 

conformity determinations. 

Previously, South Carolina had 

established a conformity SIP. In 2004, 

EPA approved the State of South 

Carolina’s SIP revision which 

incorporated by reference 40 CFR 93 

Subpart A, 67 FR 50808, and 

customized 40 CFR 93.105, 

93.122(a)(4)(ii), and 93.125(c) for all of 

the MPOs in the entire State and for the 

South Carolina Department of 

Transportation (SC DOT). Specifically, 

the State of South Carolina established 

a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) 

for implementing the conformity 

Criteria and Consultation Procedure for 

all transportation-related pollutants. 

The new conformity SIP (the subject of 

this rulemaking) removed any 

incorporation by reference and has 

revised the MOA to be consistent with 

the SAFETEA–LU revisions to the CAA 

(Pub. L. 109–59) and subsequent 

regulations published on January 24, 

2008 (73 FR 4420). While South 

Carolina currently has only one 

nonattainment area (i.e. a portion of 

York County) for the 1997 standard its 

MOA covers all of the MPOs in the State 

should new areas become subject to 

conformity requirements for a 

transportation-related pollutant in the 

future. 

The State of North Carolina will 

establish conformity procedures for the 

counties that make up the North 

Carolina portion of the bi-State 

Charlotte-Rock Hill nonattainment area 

in the individual conformity SIPs. 

III. State Submittal and EPA Evaluation 

On November 19, 2008, the State of 

South Carolina, through SC DHEC, 

submitted the Statewide conformity and 

consultation interagency SIP, based on 

an MOA signed by all of the MPOs in 

the State and SC DOT, to EPA as a 

revision to the SIP. The South Carolina 

conformity SIP establishes procedures 

for interagency consultation and 

supersedes the November 19, 2003, 

incorporation into the SIP of the MOA 

(which included previous procedures 

for interagency consultation). Prior to 

today, the MOA incorporated EPA 

regulations in 40 CFR 93 Subpart A 

(July 1, 1997), and 62 FR 43780 (August 

15, 1997) by reference. The revision to 

the MOA that EPA is approving now no 

longer incorporates the Federal 

conformity rules by reference. 

Additionally, as was the case with the 

previous MOA, it applies to all counties 

in South Carolina. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
37170 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 

The State of South Carolina 

developed its consultation SIP based on 

the elements contained in 40 CFR 

93.105, 93.122(a)(4)(ii), and 93.125(c) 

and included it in the SIP. As a first 

step, the State worked with the existing 

transportation planning organization’s 

interagency committees that included 

representatives from the SC DHEC; SC 

DOT; all of the MPOs in the State; 

Federal Highway Administration— 

South Carolina Division; Federal Transit 

Administration; and the Region 4 office 

of EPA. The interagency committee met 

regularly and drafted the consultation 

procedures considering elements in 40 

CFR Part 93.105, 93.122(a)(4)(ii), and 

93.125(c), and integrated the local 

procedures and processes into the MOA. 

The resulting consultation process 

developed is unique to the State of 

South Carolina. On April 28, 2008, SC 

DHEC held a public hearing for the 

transportation conformity MOA. The 

final MOA was issued by South 

Carolina on November 19, 2008, and 

subsequently submitted to EPA as a SIP 

revision. 

EPA has evaluated this SIP revision 

and has determined that the State has 

met the requirements of Federal 

transportation conformity rules as 

described in 40 CFR Part 51, Subpart T 

and 40 CFR Part 93, Subpart A. SC 

DHEC has satisfied the public 

participation and comprehensive 

interagency consultation requirement 

during development and adoption of the 

MOA at the local level. Therefore, EPA 

is approving the MOA as a revision to 

the South Carolina SIP. EPA’s rule 

requires the States to develop their own 

processes and procedures for 

interagency consultation among the 

Federal, State, and local agencies and 

resolution of conflicts meeting the 

criteria in 40 CFR 93.105. The SIP 

revision must include processes and 

procedures to be followed by the MPO, 

State DOT, and U.S. DOT in consulting 

with the State and local air quality 

agencies and EPA before making 

conformity determinations. The 

conformity SIP revision must also 

include processes and procedures for 

the State and local air quality agencies 

and EPA to coordinate the development 

of applicable SIPs with MPOs, State 

DOTs, and the U.S. DOT. 

EPA has reviewed the submittal to 

assure consistency with the CAA as 

amended by SAFETEA–LU and EPA 

regulations (40 CFR part 93 and 40 CFR 

51.390) governing State procedures for 

transportation conformity and 

interagency consultation and has 

concluded that the submittal is 

approvable. Details of our review are set 

forth in a technical support document 

(TSD), which has been included in the 

docket for this action. Specifically, in 

the TSD, we identify how the submitted 

procedures satisfy our requirements 

under 40 CFR 93.105 for interagency 

consultation with respect to the 

development of transportation plans 

and programs, SIPs, and conformity 

determinations, the resolution of 

conflicts, and the provision of adequate 

public consultation, and our 

requirements under 40 CFR 

93.122(a)(4)(ii) and 93.125(c) for 

enforceability of control measures and 

mitigation measures. 

IV. Public Comment and Final Action 

For the reasons set forth above, EPA 

is taking action under section 110 of the 

Act to approve the rule implementing 

the conformity criteria and consultation 

procedures revision to the South 

Carolina SIP pursuant to the CAA, as a 

revision to the South Carolina SIP. As 

a result of this action, South Carolina’s 

previously SIP-approved conformity 

procedures for South Carolina 69 FR 

4245, January 29, 2004, will be replaced 

by the procedures submitted to EPA on 

November 19, 2008 for approval and 

adopted by the State of South Carolina 

on November 28, 2008. This action also 

establishes consultation procedures for 

all counties in South Carolina. 

EPA is publishing this rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. However, in the proposed 

rules section of this Federal Register 

publication, EPA is publishing a 

separate document that will serve as the 

proposal to approve the SIP revision 

should adverse comments be filed. This 

rule will be effective September 28, 

2009 without further notice unless the 

Agency receives adverse comments by 

August 27, 2009. 

If EPA receives such comments, then 

EPA will publish a document 

withdrawing the final rule and 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. All public comments 

received will then be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Parties 

interested in commenting should do so 

at this time. If no such comments are 

received, the public is advised that this 

rule will be effective on September 28, 

2009 and no further action will be taken 

on the proposed rule. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve State choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves State law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by State law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

Tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on Tribal governments or preempt 

Tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 37171 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by September 28, 2009. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the Proposed Rules section 

of today’s Federal Register; rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Intergovernmental relations, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, 

Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen 

dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: July 8, 2009. 

Beverly H. Banister, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

■ 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart (PP)—South Carolina 

■ 2. Section 52.2120(e) is amended by 

adding a new entry at the end of the 

table for ‘‘Transportation Conformity 

SIP’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.2120 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED SOUTH CAROLINA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Provision State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

* * * * * * * 

South Carolina Transportation Conformity Air Quality Implementation 

Plan.

11/28/2008 7/28/2009 [Insert citation of publication].........................

[FR Doc. E9–17818 Filed 7–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2008–0812, EPA–RO5– 

OAR–2009–0292; FRL–8932–4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Ohio; Volatile 

Organic Compound Emission Control 

Measures for Cleveland 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving several 

volatile organic compound (VOC) 

control rules that were submitted on 

September 4, 2008, and March 23, 2009, 

into the Ohio State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). The purpose of these rules is to 

satisfy the VOC reasonably available 

control technology (RACT) requirement 

for the Cleveland-Akron 8-hour ozone 

nonattainment area. These rules are 

approvable because they satisfy the 

control and enforceability requirements 

of RACT, including Ohio’s requirement 

to adopt VOC RACT rules for the 

Control Technique Guideline (CTG) 

documents issued by EPA in 2006 and 

2007. EPA proposed these rules for 

approval on May 7, 2009, and received 

no comments. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

August 27, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

Nos. EPA–R05–OAR–2008–0812 and 

EPA–RO5–OAR–2009–0292. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 

copy at the Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation 

Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is 

open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding 

Federal holidays. We recommend that 

you telephone Steven Rosenthal, 

Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886– 

6052 before visiting the Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steven Rosenthal, Environmental 

Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6052, 

rosenthal.steven@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What Public Comments Were Received 

on the Proposed Approval and What Is EPA’s 

Response? 

II. What Action Is EPA Taking? 

III. What Is the Purpose of This Action? 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What Public Comments Were 

Received on the Proposed Approval 

and What Is EPA’s Response? 

No comments were received. 

II. What Action Is EPA Taking? 

EPA is approving several revised and 

new VOC rules into the Ohio SIP. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES