alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NLNK-2012.12.31-EX10.2






Exhibit 10.2









Iowa State University Research Park Corporation
2711 South Loop Drive, Suite 4050
Ames, Iowa 50010-8648


Memorandum of Agreement




DATE:        April 26, 2012


TO:        Nick Vahanian, President & CEO
NewLink Genetics Corporation
2503 S. Loop Drive, Suite 5100
Ames, IA 50010


FROM:    Steven T. Carter, President


		
	RE:
	ADDENDUM TO THE LEASE BETWEEN ISU RESEARCH PARK CORPORATION AND BIOPROTECTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION DATED AUGUST 22, 2005.




The following information constitutes additions to the Lease Agreement between ISU Research Park Corporation (Landlord) and BioProtection Systems Corporation (Tenant).  Upon signatures of appropriate representatives of Landlord and Tenant affixed to this Memorandum, this Memorandum becomes a part of that Lease Agreement dated August 22, 2005.


Tenant has requested and Landlord agrees to lease Suites 3500- 3532 (±3,634 rentable square feet) and Suites 3901, 3902 & 3908 (±1,155 rsf) in the following manner:


Sq. Ft.        Sq. Ft.        Monthly    Monthly    Annual           Annual
Base        Operating    Base        Operating    Base           Operating
Term        Rents        Rents        Rents        Rents        Rents           Rents


Suites 3500- 3532 (containing ±3,634 rsf)
5/1/2012-
10/31/2012    $11.90        Actual        $3,603.72    Actual        $43,244.64    Actual


Suites 3901, 3902 & 3908 (containing ±1,155 rsf)
5/1/2012-
10/31/2012    $12.75        Actual        $1,227.19    Actual        $14,726.28    Actual















BioProtection Systems Corp.
Page Two
April 26, 2012




Tenant leases the space as is.  Any modifications will be at the Tenant's sole expense.  Landlord agrees to release Tenant from this lease obligation upon Tenant's move into another facility at the ISU Research Park.  Subject to the terms of this Memorandum, Tenant agrees that all terms and conditions of the August 22, 2005 Lease and those described in this Memorandum shall remain in force.


Tenant continues to be responsible for their custodial services and the cost & maintenance for the fume hoods and plumbing in the labs & kitchen & the equipment in Rm 3531.  This agreement does not preclude other tenants from using the equipment in Rm 3531.  Gas & water usage, as well as utility costs for the HVAC system, will be prorated & invoiced monthly.  Electricity is metered separately & is invoiced directly from the provider & Tenant is responsible for having the invoices redirected.


Please sign and return both originals to my office by April 30, 2012 if you concur with the above terms.  We will then send a fully executed copy for your records.




AGREED
FOR                            FOR
BioProtection Systems Corp.                ISU Research Park Corporation


/s/ Carl Langren                    /s/ Steven T. Carter            


VP Finance                        Director                
Title                            Title
May 7, 2012                        May 7, 2012                
Date                            Date
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 868 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 868

To amend section 527 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Years 1994 and 1995 to require that certain claims for expropriation by 
 the Government of Nicaragua meet certain requirements for purposes of 
       the prohibition on foreign assistance to that government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2003

 Mr. Ballenger (for himself and Mr. Delahunt) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 527 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Years 1994 and 1995 to require that certain claims for expropriation by 
 the Government of Nicaragua meet certain requirements for purposes of 
       the prohibition on foreign assistance to that government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nicaragua Property Dispute 
Settlement Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN CLAIMS FOR EXPROPRIATION BY THE GOVERNMENT OF 
              NICARAGUA.

    Section 527 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Years 1994 and 1995 (22 U.S.C. 2370a) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Certain Claims for Expropriation by Government of 
Nicaragua.--(1) Any action of the types set forth in subparagraphs (A), 
(B), and (C) of subsection (a)(1) that was taken by the Government of 
Nicaragua during the period beginning on January 1, 1956, and ending on 
January 9, 2002, shall not be considered in implementing the 
prohibition under subsection (a) unless the action has been presented 
in accordance with the procedure set forth in paragraph (2)
    ``(2) An action shall be deemed presented for purposes of paragraph 
(1) if it is--
            ``(A) in writing; and
            ``(B) received by the Department of State on or before 120 
        days after the date specified in paragraph (3) at--
                    ``(i) the headquarters of the Department of State 
                in Washington, D.C.; or
                    ``(ii) the Embassy of the United States of America 
                to Nicaragua.
    ``(3) The date to which paragraph (2) refers is a date after the 
enactment of this subsection that is specified by the Secretary of 
State, in the Secretary's discretion, in a notice published in the 
Federal Register.''.
                                 <all>
```
HOUSEHOLD DATA HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

Sex and reason

2010

Thousands of

persons Methods used as a percent of total jobseekers

Average

number

of

methods

used

Total

unemployed

Total

jobseekers

Employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

 Total, 16 years and over ......................................................... 14,825 13,394 53.6 55.2 18.4 28.8 22.2 8.9 15.4 2.03

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 9,250 7,819 55.6 54.1 20.5 32.5 26.3 10.7 16.4 2.17

Job leavers ............................................................................... 889 889 53.1 58.0 18.6 25.1 20.7 8.3 14.9 2.00

Reentrants ................................................................................ 3,466 3,466 50.0 55.9 15.6 23.5 17.0 6.4 14.9 1.84

New entrants ............................................................................ 1,220 1,220 51.5 58.4 12.9 22.9 12.3 5.1 11.3 1.75

 Men, 16 years and over .......................................................... 8,626 7,638 54.9 52.7 18.1 30.4 23.0 9.0 15.7 2.04

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 5,919 4,932 56.4 51.8 19.7 33.2 26.5 10.5 16.6 2.15

Job leavers ............................................................................... 457 457 54.2 56.0 17.9 27.9 19.5 7.9 14.3 1.98

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,608 1,608 51.1 52.6 15.2 25.0 17.2 6.6 15.1 1.84

New entrants ............................................................................ 641 641 52.7 57.9 13.4 23.9 12.3 4.7 11.0 1.76

 Women, 16 years and over .................................................... 6,199 5,756 52.0 58.5 18.8 26.7 21.2 8.8 15.1 2.02

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 3,331 2,888 54.3 57.9 21.9 31.2 25.8 11.0 16.1 2.19

Job leavers ............................................................................... 432 432 52.0 60.2 19.3 22.2 21.9 8.7 15.7 2.01

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,858 1,858 49.1 58.7 15.8 22.1 16.8 6.2 14.6 1.84

New entrants ............................................................................ 579 579 50.1 58.9 12.3 21.7 12.3 5.6 11.5 1.73

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude

persons on temporary layoff.

 NOTE: The jobseekers total is less than the total unemployed because it does

not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will

always total more than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method.

 Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January

data.

50
# County Employment and Wages

"The County Employment and Wages (CEWQTR) release presents the average weekly wages by quarter of all workers covered by State and federal unemployment insurance (UI) programs. Average monthly employment for these workers is also reported. Wages and employment are presented by county and by State. This release is issued quarterly. For more information, visit the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages home page at www.bls.gov/cew/. "

- Clayton, GA, has largest county 3rd quarter over-the-year wage gain at 7.7%
- Clayton, GA, has largest county 2nd quarter over-the-year wage gain at 17.2%
- Clayton, GA, has largest county 1st quarter over-the-year wage gain at 24.3%
- San Francisco, CA, has largest county 4th quarter 2022 over-the-year wage loss at 22.6%
- Midland, TX, has largest county 3rd quarter 2022 over-the-year wage gain at 13.9%
- Saratoga, NY, has largest county 2nd quarter 2022 over-the-year wage gain at 16.3%
- Peoria, IL, has largest county 1st quarter 2022 over-the-year wage gain at 25.8%
- Palm Beach, FL, has largest county 4th quarter 2021 over-the-year wage gain at 15.6%
- San Mateo, CA, has largest county 3rd quarter 2021 over-the-year wage gain at 27.2%
- Atlantic, NJ, has the largest over-the-year June employment gain at 36.8%
- San Francisco, CA, has largest county 1st quarter 2021 over-the-year wage gain at 33.9%
- San Francisco, CA, has largest county 4th quarter 2020 over-the-year wage gain at 44.3%
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          81,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 10,101,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,182,678
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,182,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          428,185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,754,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,182,678
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   745
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    745
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                745
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       745
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 687 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 687

      To prohibit the Federal Government from accepting a form of 
 identification issued by a foreign government, except for a passport 
 that is accepted for such a purpose on the date of enactment of this 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

 Mr. Gallegly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on 
House Administration and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prohibit the Federal Government from accepting a form of 
 identification issued by a foreign government, except for a passport 
 that is accepted for such a purpose on the date of enactment of this 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Identification Integrity Act of 
2003'' .

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCEPTANCE OF IDENTIFICATION ISSUED BY FOREIGN 
              GOVERMENTS.

    (a) In General.--An employee of the executive, legislative, or 
judicial branch of the Federal government may not accept from an 
individual, for purposes of establishing identity, a form of 
identification issued by a foreign government.
    (b) Exception.--If passports issued by foreign governments are 
authorized by Federal law to be used for a specific purpose on the date 
of the enactment of this Act, subsection (a) shall not be construed to 
affect such authorization.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2008 of Stein Mart, Inc. (the Form 10-Q), I, James G. Delfs, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                           
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 10, 2008 |  | /s/ James G. Delfs                                        
|                        |  | James G. Delfs                                            
|                        |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer



20
----

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania        March 26, 2003
Case 2:11-mj-08143-MCA Document 3 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 6
EX-10.15



 Exhibit 10.15 
 December 5, 2012 
 William (Obi) Greenman 

[Address] 
 Dear Obi, 

The purpose of this letter is to amend the terms of your Employment Letter Agreement with Cerus Corporation dated May 12, 2011 (the
“Agreement”) in order to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 
 Effective as of the date
of this amendment, the Agreement is amended to add the following as a new paragraph in the section titled “Section 409A” in the Agreement: 
 If the Company determines that the Severance Benefits constitute “deferred compensation” under Section 409A, then notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary (but subject to
the immediately foregoing paragraph), payment of the Severance Benefits shall commence on a date within fifty-three (53) days following your separation from service (which period constitutes the period with the latest permitted effective date
of the Release), with the first such payment paid in a lump sum amount equal to the sum of the Severance Benefits that you would otherwise have received on or prior to such date but for the delay in payment related to the effectiveness of the
Release and the balance of the Severance Benefits, if any, paid thereafter in accordance with the applicable payment schedule set forth in this Agreement, provided that the Release becomes effective in accordance with its terms by such date;
provided, however, that if such fifty-three (53) day period begins in one taxable year and ends in a second taxable year, such payment shall commence in the second taxable year. 
 Please sign below to indicate your acceptance of this amendment of the Agreement. 
 Sincerely,

  

	
	 /s/ Lori L. Roll

	Lori L. Roll
	Vice President, Administration

  

									
	Approved and Accepted	 	 /s/ William (Obi) Greenman
	 		 	Date	 	12/5/2012
		 	William (Obi) Greenman
#### Hyland P. Rice, Respondent, *v.*The New York City Railway Company, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

June, 1905.)

Negligence—Burden of proof — When erroneous charge cured.

A charge to the jury, in an action to recover for personal injuries, that “ the burden of showing that the accident did not happen through the defendant’s negligence is upon the defendant ”, is erroneous, but is cured by a subsequent charge that “ while the law calls upon the defendant, under such a condition as the plaintiff claims existed here, to explain, yet on the whole case, the burden is upon the plaintiff in the end to convince the jury that the accident occurred through the negligence of the defendant ”.

MacLean, J., dissented.

*657Appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city; of Few York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.

William E. Weaver, for appellant.

Wales E. Severance, for respondent. '

Scott, J.

If the case had gone to the jury solely upon the colloquial charge to the effect that “ the burden of showing that the accident did not happen through the defendant’s negligence is upon the defendant,” it would be open to defendant to claim that the jury were wrongly instructed. Maher v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., 102 App. Div. 517. The court, however, afterward charged, at plaintiff’s request, that “ while the law calls upon the defendant, under such a condition as the plaintiff claims existed here, to explain, yet on the whole case the burden is upon the plaintiff in the end to convince the jury that the accident occurred through the negligence of the defendant.” This was a perfectly correct statement of the law (Maher v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., *supra),*and cured any error in the colloquial charge. The defendant did not clear itself of negligence, the evidence justified the verdict and its amount was moderate.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Dugko, J’"., concurs.

MacLean, J.

(dissenting). The plaintiff claimed that while on the rear platform of one of the defendant’s cars, and as he was about to alight, he received an electric shock thereon and sustained injury. Under the decision in D’Arcy v. Westchester El. R. Co., 82 App. Div. 263, the rule of *res ipsa loquitur*applied, but the defendant contends that it was error to charge: “ This is one of the cases in which the mere happening of the accident places upon the defendant the burden of explaining it and showing it did not happen through the negligence of the defendant. Ordinarily, that bu rden is upon the plaintiff, but in this case the burden *658of showing that the accident did not happen through the defendant’s negligence is upon the defendant.” The exception of the defendant thereto must needs he sustained un,(der the authority of Maher v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., 102 App. Div. 517, and the judgment rendered upon the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff he reversed and a new trial ordered.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant- to abide the event.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of MedQuist Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Cohen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.





David A. Cohen
-----------------------
David A. Cohen
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2003