alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 6/26/96 TENTH CIRCUIT
GENE TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, vs. R. MICHAEL CODY; PHIL GILSTRAP, Defendants - Appellees. No. 96-6003 (D.C. No. CIV-95-188-A) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. ** Mr. Taylor, an inmate appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants. Mr. Taylor contends that prison officials violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by refusing to deliver white supremacist literature to him. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Wolf v. Prudential Ins. Co. , 50 F.3d 793, 796 (10th Cir. 1996). Prisons may- 2 -

regulate incoming literature to prisoners if such regulations are “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests.” Thornburgh v. Abbott , 490 U.S. 401, 413 (1989) (quoting Turner v. Safely , 482 U.S. 78, 89 (1987)). The district court held that the regulations in question were valid both facially and as applied. Considering the violent and hateful content of the literature, the court found that Defendant’s refusal to allow Plaintiff access to the literature was reasonably related to a legitimate penological interest, namely the maintenance of a safe and orderly prison. We agree. As to Mr. Taylor’s claim of due process violation, the availability of procedures for appealing the decision to withhold his mail satisfies due process. See Procunier v. Martinez , 416 U.S. 396, 417-19 (1974), partially overruled on other grounds , Thornburgh v. Abbott , 490 U.S. 401, 413-14 (1989). AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00397-CR

Aaron Lambert Sloan, Jr., Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2003-127, HONORABLE TODD A. BLOMERTH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Aaron Lambert Sloan, Jr., seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for failing
to assist at an accident. The trial court has certified, and the record confirms, that Sloan waived the right of appeal. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Monreal v. State , 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). The appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

__________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Pemberton Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: July 29, 2004 Do Not Publish
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 981

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 141 Erie Street in

Linesville, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘James R. MerryPost Office’’.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 981

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 141 Erie Street in Linesville, Pennsylvania,

as the ‘‘James R. Merry Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 981 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 141 Erie Street in Linesville, Pennsylvania, shall

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘James R. Merry Post

5 Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘James R. Merry Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 26,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
2013 IVC EX 10 v










Exhibit 10 (v)




Non-Employee Director Compensation
January 2013




Board Members:


Annual Retainer:                    $  60,000
    
Annual Equity Award:                $  90,000*


      *Target Value of restricted stock          
$150,000


Lead Director Fee:        $  20,000


Committee Chair Fees:


Audit                $  15,000
Compensation        $  15,000
Governance            $  10,000
Nominating            $  10,000
Investment            $  10,000




Meeting Fees:            $   1,500**


   **For meetings attended in excess of 24 in a year




Initial Equity Grant:


Number of restricted shares equal to $150,000 divided by closing price of Company's stock on the date of election to the Board
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the filing by Rush Financial Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
2005 (the "Report"), I, Randy Rutledge, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
               2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operation of the Company.




                                       /s/ Randy Rutledge
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Randy Rutledge
                                       Chief Financial and Accounting Officer


Dated:  August 19, 2005


This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent as shall be expressly set forth by
specific reference in such filing.
Exhibit
32.1








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William H.
Armstrong III, as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May
5, 2009








/s/
William H. Armstrong III


William
H. Armstrong III


Chairman
of the Board, President and


Chief
Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Seat belt useage
# International Comparisons of Hourly Compensation Costs in Manufacturing

"The International Comparisons of Hourly Compensation Costs in Manufacturing (ICHCC) release compares across countries the hourly cost per employee that employers pay in the manufacturing sector. The cost includes wages and salaries and benefits. This release is issued once per year. For more information, visit the International Labor Comparisons home page at www.bls.gov/ilc."

- U.S. manufacturing hourly compensation costs in 2011 lower than in 15 countries
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
      Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1998 and December 31, 1997 and
      the Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 1998 and
      March 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             302,000 
<SECURITIES>                                        17,000 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,002,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        84,000 
<INVENTORY>                                      3,668,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,242,000 
<PP&E>                                           3,300,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,176,000 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,863,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,595,000 
<BONDS>                                                  0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                           241,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,338,000 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,863,000 
<SALES>                                          4,742,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,742,000 
<CGS>                                            2,846,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,846,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,759,000 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  54,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     83,000 
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 83,000 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                        83,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### United States *v.*Leatherberry.

*(District Court, S. D. Mississippi.*

May 26, 1886.)

Public Lands — Protection of Timber — Boxing Trees for Turpentine— Section 2461, Rev. St., Construed.

It is a violation of section 2461, Rev. St., to box and chip trees, growing on tbe public domain, for turpentine purposes.

Motion to Exclude Evidence.

*J. B. Harris,*U. S. Atty., for the United States.

*Luke Lea,*for defendant.

Hill, J.

It is admitted in this case that the trees were not severed or felled, and that the only cutting was what is known as boxing and chipping the trees, in order to extract the gum or sap, for turpentine or resin. The counsel for the defendant moves the court to exclude the evidence of the plaintiff, as it does not make out an offense against the law. I am, however, of the opinion that the motion must be overruled. The object and purpose of the statute (section 2461) is to protect the public timber. This purpose would, in a great measure, be defeated should the view of defendant’s counsel prevail. The language of the statute is, *“cut,*or procure to be *cut,*or aid or assist or be employed in cutting,” etc., “with intent to export, dispose of, use, or employ the same in any manner whatsoever other than for the use'of the navy of the United States.” Certainly cutting the timber in order to extract its gum and- sap for one’s private use is cutting it with intent to use and employ it in a manner other than for the navy of the United States.

Motion overruled.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court No. DA 23-0200 MATTHEW “MATT” OLDS, Plaintiff /Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v. MARK HUELSKAMP, Defendant/Appellan t/Cross-Appellee. ORDER

On Appeal from the Four th Judicial District Court, Missoula County Cause No. DV-19-1036 The Honorable Jason Marks, Presiding

______________________ ________________ Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee Ma rk Huelskamp (“Huelskamp”) has moved, unopposed, for a 30-day extension of time, up to and including November 17, 2023, to file his Reply Brief and Response to Cross-Appeal Brief (“Reply/Response Brief”), which is currently set for October 20, 2023. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Huelskamp’s motion is granted, and he may have up to and including November 17, 2023 in which to file his Reply/Response Brief. Dated: _____________

________________________________ Clerk of the Supreme Court

cc: Scott M. Stearns/Zach A. Franz Carey B. Schmidt/David C. Berkoff

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 5 2023

10/05/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0200
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Dated:  August 8, 2008
    By:
    /s/ J. Richard Damron, Jr.J. Richard Damron, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer 29
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 CECILE FOY GSANGER

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

June 9, 2015

Hon. Gilberto Hinojosa

Attorney at Law

622 E. St. Charles St.

Brownsville, TX 78520

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Jerad Najvar

Attorney at Law

4151 Southwest Freeway, Ste. 625

Houston, TX 77027

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00581-CV

Tr.Ct.No. C-6914-13-G

Style: Lupe Rivera v. Leticia "Letty" Lopez

Appellant's motion for leave and motion to file for extension of time to file motion 

for en banc reconsideration on the above cause were this day Granted by this Court. 

The time to file motion for en banc reconsideration has been extended to Monday, June 

29, 2015.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 752

To prohibit oil and gas drilling in Finger Lakes National Forest in New 

York. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2003

Mr. WALSH (for himself, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. QUINN, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. 

SLAUGHTER, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr. OLVER, Mr. ENGEL, Ms. 

KAPTUR, Mr. RAHALL, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. PASCRELL, 

Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. OWENS, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. GEORGE

MILLER of California, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́, Mr. TOWNS, 

Mr. WEINER, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. 

STUPAK, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. NADLER, Mr. CROWLEY, and Mr. BOEHLERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL

To prohibit oil and gas drilling in Finger Lakes National 

Forest in New York.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OIL AND GAS DRILLING IN FINGER LAKES NA4 TIONAL FOREST IN NEW YORK PROHIBITED. 

5 No Federal permit or lease shall be issued for oil or 

6 gas drilling in Finger Lakes National Forest in New York.

Æ
# laucnty14

&8Page &P of &N
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of OPNET Technologies, Inc. (the
Company), I, Mel F. Wesley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                           
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 8, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mel F. Wesley                         
|                    |  |     |  | Mel F. Wesley                             
|                    |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17726]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Friday, July 31, 2009; 1:30 p.m. EDT.

Place: Via Teleconference, Public Dial In--1-800-597-7623, Conference 
ID <greek-i> 21390687.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. State Advisory Committee Issues
    <bullet> Arizona SAC
    <bullet> Hawaii SAC
    <bullet> Michigan SAC
    <bullet> Utah SAC
III. Program Planning
    <bullet> Update on National Civil Rights Conference
IV. Adjourn

Contact Person for Further Information: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit, (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: July 21, 2009.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-17726 Filed 7-21-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,952,535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,123,524
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    793,709
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,252,663
<PP&E>                                       9,485,195
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,828,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,000,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,563,814
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,736,124
<COMMON>                                           716
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,000,190
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,572,929
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,906,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,608,019
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,606,669
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Soyo Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period  ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Nancy
Chu, Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13a-14(b) or
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Nancy Chu
-----------------------
Nancy Chu
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2006