36710 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices 

as supplemented by the EPA in 5 CFR 

part 6401. In anticipation of this 

requirement, prospective candidates for 

service on the FIFRA SAP will be asked 

to submit confidential financial 

information which shall fully disclose, 

among other financial interests, the 

candidate’s employment, stocks and 

bonds, and where applicable, sources of 

research support. The EPA will evaluate 

the candidates financial disclosure form 

to assess whether there are financial 

conflicts of interest, appearance of a 

lack of impartiality or any prior 

involvement with the development of 

the documents under consideration 

(including previous scientific peer 

review) before the candidate is 

considered further for service on FIFRA 

SAP. Those who are selected from the 

pool of prospective candidates will be 

asked to attend the public meetings and 

to participate in the discussion of key 

issues and assumptions at these 

meetings. In addition, they will be asked 

to review and to help finalize the 

meeting minutes. The list of FIFRA SAP 

members participating at this meeting 

will be posted on the FIFRA SAP 

website at http://epa.gov/scipoly/sap or 

may be obtained from the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

II. Background 

A. Purpose of FIFRA SAP 

FIFRA SAP serves as the primary 

scientific peer review mechanism of 

EPA’s Office of Prevention, Pesticides 

and Toxic Substances (OPPTS) and is 

structured to provide scientific advice, 

information and recommendations to 

the EPA Administrator on pesticides 

and pesticide-related issues as to the 

impact of regulatory actions on health 

and the environment. FIFRA SAP is a 

Federal advisory committee established 

in 1975 under FIFRA that operates in 

accordance with requirements of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act. FIFRA 

SAP is composed of a permanent panel 

consisting of seven members who are 

appointed by the EPA Administrator 

from nominees provided by the National 

Institutes of Health and the National 

Science Foundation. FIFRA, as 

amended by FQPA, established a 

Science Review Board consisting of at 

least 60 scientists who are available to 

the SAP on an ad hoc basis to assist in 

reviews conducted by the SAP. As a 

peer review mechanism, FIFRA SAP 

provides comments, evaluations and 

recommendations to improve the 

effectiveness and quality of analyses 

made by Agency scientists. Members of 

FIFRA SAP are scientists who have 

sufficient professional qualifications, 

including training and experience, to 

provide expert advice and 

recommendation to the Agency. 

B. Public Meeting 

The Standard Operating Procedures 

for Residential Exposure Assessment 

(i.e., Residential SOPs) is a set of 

standard instructions for estimating 

exposure resulting from various nonoccupational pesticide uses including 

lawn and garden care, foggers, and pet 

treatments. Developed by the Health 

Effects Division of EPA’s Office of 

Pesticide Programs (EPA/OPP/HED) in 

the 1990s pursuant to the Food Quality 

Protection Act (FQPA) requiring 

consideration of non-dietary nonoccupational exposures for the purposes 

of aggregate pesticide exposure 

estimates, they were first presented to 

the FIFRA SAP in 1997 (http:// 

www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/ 

1997/september/finalsep.htm#2) with 

additional SAP review in 1999 (http:// 

www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/ 

1999/092199_mtg.htm), and have since 

been utilized with various updates to 

data sources and methodologies, 

including a supplemental document in 

2001 (Exposure Policy #12: 

Recommended Revisions to the 

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) 

for Residential Exposure Assessment. 

February 22, 2001 (EPA/OPP/HED)). 

Recently, the Agency has undertaken 

a substantial revision to the Residential 

SOPs to: Incorporate interim updates 

and revisions since their inception; 

research, incorporate, and statistically 

analyze more current and reliable data 

for the purposes of informing standard 

algorithm inputs (i.e., point estimates 

and distributions for deterministic and 

probabilistic exposure assessments, 

respectively); and, update and/or revise 

standard exposure assessment 

methodologies. 

EPA’s goal is to have a set of 

instructions that include transparent 

methodologies and data inputs that 

guide the assessment of nonoccupational pesticide exposure in a 

straightforward and user-friendly 

fashion. The Agency is seeking 

comment from the Panel on the 

adequacy of the exposure assessment 

methodologies and algorithms; the 

applicability, analysis, and use of 

available pesticide use information, 

activity pattern information, and 

pesticide exposure data; the process by 

which inputs are selected for use in 

residential pesticide exposure 

assessments; and the overall clarity, 

transparency, and utility of the SOPs. 

C. FIFRA SAP Documents and Meeting 

Minutes 

EPA’s background paper, related 

supporting materials, charge/questions 

to FIFRA SAP, FIFRA SAP composition 

(i.e., members and ad hoc members for 

this meeting), and the meeting agenda 

will be available by early September. In 

addition, the Agency may provide 

additional background documents as the 

materials become available. You may 

obtain electronic copies of these 

documents, and certain other related 

documents that might be available 

electronically, at http:// 

www.regulations.gov and the FIFRA 

SAP homepage at http://www.epa.gov/ 

scipoly/sap. 

FIFRA SAP will prepare meeting 

minutes summarizing its 

recommendations to the Agency 

approximately 90 days after the 

meeting. The meeting minutes will be 

posted on the FIFRA SAP website or 

may be obtained from the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, Pesticides 

and pests. 

Dated: July 16, 2009. 

Steven M. Knott, 

Acting Director, Office of Science 

Coordination and Policy. 

[FR Doc. E9–17710 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request; 3064–0077 

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation (FDIC). 

ACTION: Notice of information collection 

to be submitted to Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for review and 

approval under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), the FDIC hereby gives notice 

that it is submitting to OMB a request 

for OMB review and approval of the 

renewal of the information collection 

system described below. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before August 24, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are 

invited to submit written comments on 

the collection of information entitled: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices 36711 

1The form being renewed was approved by OMB 

effective June 30, 2007. On May 1, 2007, FinCEN 

published a Federal Register notice (72 FR 23891) 

(http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/frn/pdf/ 

sar_fr_notice.pdf) announcing the delayed 

implementation of the revised Suspicious Activity 

Report (SAR) forms. The revised SAR forms that 

support joint filings were originally scheduled to 

become effective on June 30, 2007 and mandatory 

on December 31, 2007. The delay in 

implementation does not impact ongoing 

suspicious activity reporting. Filers should 

continue to use the July 2003 form until further 

notice (http://www.fincen.gov/forms/files/f9022- 

47_sar-di.pdf). FinCEN will establish new dates for 

using the revised SAR forms in a future notice. 

Depository institutions will be provided ample lead 

time to incorporate the approved version. 

Suspicious Activity Report by 

Depository Institutions (3064–0077). 

All comments should refer to the 

name and number of the collection. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

• http://www.FDIC.gov/regulations/ 

laws/federalnotices.html. 

• E-mail: comments@fdic.gov. 

Include the name and number of the 

collection in the subject line of the 

message. 

• Mail: Gary A. Kuiper 

(202.898.3877), Counsel, Federal 

Deposit Insurance Corporation, F–1072, 

550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 

20429. 

• Hand Delivery: Comments may be 

hand-delivered to the guard station at 

the rear of the 550 17th Street Building 

(located on F Street), on business days 

between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. 

A copy of the comments may also be 

submitted to the OMB desk officer for 

the FDIC, Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary 

A. Kuiper, at the address identified 

above. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Proposal to Renew the Following 

Currently Approved Collection of 

Information 

Title: Suspicious Activity Report by 

Depository Institutions (SAR). The FDIC 

is renewing the information collection 

covered under Part 353—Suspicious 

Activity Reports, 12 CFR Part 353. 

OMB Number: 3064–0077. 

Form Number: 6710/06. 

Current Action: The FDIC proposes to 

renew, without revision, the currently 

approved form.1

Type of Review: Renewal of a 

currently approved collection. 

Affected Public: Business, for profit 

institutions, and non-profit institutions. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

5148. 

Estimated Total Annual Responses: 

133,151. 

Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour. 

Total Annual Burden: 133,151 hours. 

General Description of Collection: In 

1985, the Banking Supervisory Agencies 

issued procedures to be used by banks 

and certain other financial institutions 

operating in the United States to report 

known or suspected criminal activities 

to the appropriate law enforcement and 

Banking Supervisory Agencies. 

Beginning in 1994, the Banking 

Supervisory Agencies and the FinCEN 

redesigned the reporting process 

resulting in the Suspicious Activity 

Report, which became effective in April 

1996. The report is authorized by the 

following regulations: 31 CFR 103.18 

(FinCEN); 12 CFR 21.11 (OCC); 12 CFR 

563.180 (OTS); 12 CFR 208.62(c), 

211.5(k), 211.24(f), and 225.4(f) (Board); 

12 CFR 353.3 (FDIC); 12 CFR 748.1 

(NCUA). The regulations were issued 

under the authority contained in the 

following statutes: 31 U.S.C. 5318(g) 

(FinCEN); 12 U.S.C. 93a, 1818, 1881–84, 

3401–22, 31 U.S.C. 5318 (OCC); 12 

U.S.C. 1463 and 1464 (OTS); 12 U.S.C. 

248(a)(1), 625, 1818, 1844(c), 3105(c)(2) 

and 3106(a) (Board); 12 U.S.C. 1818– 

1820 (FDIC); 12 U.S.C. 1766(a), 1789(a) 

(NCUA). 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless the collection of information 

displays a valid Office of Management 

and Budget control number. Records 

required to be retained under the Bank 

Secrecy Act and these regulations 

issued by the Banking Supervisory 

Agencies must be retained for five years. 

Generally, information collected 

pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act is 

confidential, but may be shared as 

provided by law with regulatory and 

law enforcement authorities. 

Request for Comment 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

this collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the FDIC’s functions, including whether 

the information has practical utility; (b) 

the accuracy of the estimate of the 

burden of the information collection, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the information collection on 

respondents, including through the use 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

All comments will become a matter of 

public record. 

Dated at Washington, DC, this 21st day of 

July 2009. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary, Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation. 

[FR Doc. E9–17724 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6714–01–P 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Change in Bank Control Notices, 

Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank 

Holding Companies; Correction 

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 

E9–17111 published on pages 35190 

anbd 35191 of the issue for Monday, 

July 20, 2009. 

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of 

Kansas City heading, the entry for 

Central Bancorp, Inc., Colorado Springs, 

Colorado, is revised to read as follows: 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas 

City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant Vice 

President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas 

City, Missouri 64198–0001: 

1. Central Bancorp, Inc., Colorado 

Springs, Colorado; to become a bank 

holding company by acquiring 100 

percent of the voting shares of Farmers 

and Stockmens Bank of Clayton, 

Clayton, New Mexico, and The Citizens 

National Bank of Akron, Akron, 

Colorado. 

Applicant also has applied to retain 

voting shares of Elite Properties of 

America II, Inc.; CB&T Mortgage, LLC; 

and CB&T Wealth Management, all of 

Colorado Springs, Colorado; Corundum 

Trust Company, Sioux Falls, South 

Dakota, and thereby engage in, 

extending credit and servicing of loans, 

pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1); 

financial and investment advisory 

activities, pursuant to sections 

225.28(b)(6)(i) and (b)(6)(v); and trust 

activities, pursuant to section 

225.28(b)(5) of Regulation Y. 

Comments on this application must 

be received by August 13, 2009. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, July 21, 2009. 

Margaret McCloskey Shanks, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. E9–17685 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–S 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and 

Mergers of Bank Holding Companies 

The companies listed in this notice 

have applied to the Board for approval, 

pursuant to the Bank Holding Company 

Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) 

(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES