alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended January 4, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K for the year fiscal period January 4, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jane ToddJane ToddChief Financial Officer




|Date: | April 6, 2009
|----- | -------------

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3487

___________ Diane Gardner, Kermit Gardner, * Amy Gardner, Jessie Gardner, and * Sarah Gardner, By and Through * Their Next Friend and Natural * Mother, Diane Gardner, * * Appellants, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern Walter "Buck" Buerger, Sheriff of * District of Missouri. Jefferson County, Missouri, As an * Individual and In His Official * [UNPUBISHED] Capacity, and C. Partain, Deputy * Sheriff of Jefferson County, * Missouri, As an Individual and In * His Official Capacity, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 25, 1998 Filed: October 16, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, C hief Judge, and JOHN R. GIBSON and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Missouri. -2- PER CURIAM. The Gardn ers brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, after Charle s Partain, a Jefferson County, Missouri, deputy sheriff, shot and killed Charles Gardner whileserving an ex parte order of protection. The Gardners maintained that Deputy Part ainused excessive force when he shot Mr. Gardner, and that Jefferson County Sheriff Walt

er Buerger failed to train Deputy Partain adequately. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the two police officers, and the trial court entered judgment on the 1 verdict.
The Ga rdners argue on appeal that the trial court erred in excluding certai n evidence regarding the use of force and the reasonab leness of Deputy Partain's actions. Hav ing carefully reviewed the parties' briefs and the record in this case, we conclude that the trial court did not err in excluding the evidence. Accordingly, we affirm th e judgment of the trial court. See 8 Cir. R. 47B. th A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Matritech, Inc. (the registrant):2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be
designed under our
supervision, to ensure that
material information relating
to the registrant, including
its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those
entities, particularly during
the period in which this
report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Paragraph omitted in
accordance with SEC
transition instructions
contained in SEC Release
33-8238 and 34-47986.]c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrants
disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this
report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants
internal control over
financial reporting that
occurred during the
registrants third fiscal
quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal
control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of
internal controls over
financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to
adversely affect the
registrants ability to
record, process, summarize
and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves
management or other employees
who have a significant role
in the registrants internal
controls over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Stephen D. ChubbStephen D. ChubbChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MedQuist Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Cohen,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ David A. Cohen
------------------

David A. Cohen
President and Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2002
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Focus Enhancements, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Gary L. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.
| /s/Gary L. Williams     |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                    |
| Gary L. Williams        |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 14, 2006       |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Soyo Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period  ended  December 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the  undersigned,  Ming
Tung Chok,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13a-14(b) or
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Ming Tung Chok
-----------------------
Ming Tung Chok
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         787,446
<SECURITIES>                                 4,054,385
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,088,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,066,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,289,805
<PP&E>                                       2,926,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,333,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,880,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           703
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,597,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,333,870
<SALES>                                      1,514,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,624,943
<CGS>                                        1,281,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,403,274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,752,630)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of CareScience, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David J. Brailer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|/s/DAVID J. BRAILER                                     |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|David J. Brailer
Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003 |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CareScience, Inc. and will be retained by CareScience, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed February 23, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-12-00024-CV

____________

JOHN J. PRESTON AND MONICA S. PRESTON, Appellants

V.

MICHAEL A. INGLIS AND ALLEN GREGORY ALPER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10CV2676

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 23, 2012.

On February 9, 2012, appellants filed an unopposed motion to reverse the judgment 

and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the 

parties' settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, we reverse the judgment signed September 23, 2012, and we remand 

the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties'

agreement.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Brown, and Boyce.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

JESSE DARNELL PELLOW, : No. 12 WM 2024 

Petitioner 

V. 

BLAIR COUNTY COURT OF COMMON 

PLEAS, BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, PENNSYLVANIA 

SUPERIOR COURT, PENNSYLVANIA 

BOARD OF NURSING, PENNSYLVANIA 

HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION, 

Respondents 

ORDER

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 4t" day of June, 2024, to the extent Petitioner seeks relief as to his 

criminal matter, the "Application for Exercise of Extraordinary Jurisdiction or King's Bench 

Power," the Motion for Clarification, the Application for Leave to File Response, and the 

"Request to Inform" are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 ( Pa. 2010) 

(barring hybrid representation). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward those filings 

to counsel of record. 

In all other respects, the "Application for Exercise of Extraordinary Jurisdiction or 

King's Bench Power," the Motion for Clarification, the Application for Leave to File 

Response, and the " Request to Inform" are DENIED.
#### Schultz *v.*Ostrander.1

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri.*

April 20, 1886.)

Patents for Inventions—Reissue—Enlarging Claim—Steam-Pumps.

The first, second, third, and sixth claims of reissued letters patent No. 9,818, granted to M. Schultz for an improvement in steam-pumps, *held,*unlawful expansions of the original patent, and therefore void.

In Equity. Suit for the infringement of reissued letters patent No. 9,818, granted to M. Schultz for an improvement in steam-pumps.

*L. M. Hosea,*for complainant.

*Charles A. Hawley,*for defendant.

1

 Reported by Benj. F. Rex, Esq., of the St. Louis bar.

*296Treat, *J.*

Under the admissions of counsel that the defendant does not infringe the fourth and fifth claims of the reissued patent sued on, (No. 9,818,) the court is brought sharply to a determination of the question as to whether the other claims in the said reissued patent are expansions of the original patent, and void in law. The struggle seems to be to cover, under reissue, the frame-work employed on the pump, of which there was nothing suggested in the original patent. Hence the court holds that the first, second, third, and sixth claims of said reissued patent are unlawful expansions of the original patent, and therefore void.

Bill dismissed, with- costs.
No. 45,598

#### State of Kansas, *Appellee,*v. Bruce LaVern Brooks, *Appellant.*

(476 P. 2d 617)

Opinion filed November 7, 1970.

*Richard E. Blackwell,*of Salina, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant.

*Bill Crews,*county attorney, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

The appellant, Bruce LaVern Brooks, was tried and convicted by a jury of the offenses of second degree burglary and larceny (K. S. A. 21-520 and 21-525, respectively), and sentenced to confinement and hard labor pursuant to K. S. A. 21-107a, for a term of not less than ten years nor more than twenty years in the Kansas State Penitentiary.

The appellant was one of the occupants in a Chevrolet automobile driven by Bernard Donald Kanan, which was stopped by Saline County Deputy Sheriff Siewert at 3:13 a. m. on the morning of March 18, 1968, in Salina, Kansas. The facts of the appellant’s arrest, the search of the Kanan automobile, and the seizure of money and checks identified as coming from the Eagles Lodge in Safina, are fully detailed in the court’s opinion in *State v. McMillin,*206 Kan. 3, 476 P. 2d 612.

The appellant’s sole contention is the legality of the vehicular search and seizure of stolen property found in the Kanan automobile. The fruits of the search were introduced into evidence over objection of the defendant at his trial which resulted in a jury finding him guilty.

*10The same contention was made and decided in *State v. McMillin,*supra, and the matter was thoroughly dealt with therein. We follow and incorporate herein the opinion in the *McMillin*case which contains a complete statement of the facts, the law, and this court’s conclusions which warrant affirmance of this case.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5201 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electron guns for cathode ray tubes 

(CRT’s) with a high definition television screen aspect ratio of 16:9, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2004 

Mr. ENGLISH (for himself, Mr. MURPHY, and Ms. HART) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electron guns for cathode ray tubes (CRT’s) with a high definition television 

screen aspect ratio of 16:9, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTRON GUNS FOR CATHODE RAY TUBES 

4 AND OTHER TELEVISION PARTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

6 (1) ELECTRON GUNS FOR CATHODE RAY

7 TUBES.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
2 

•HR 5201 IH 

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the fol2 lowing new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.23 Electron guns actually used 

for cathode ray tubes 

(CRT’s) with a high definition television screen aspect 

ratio of 16:9 (provided for in 

subheading 8540.91.50 ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 

3 (2) LCD PANEL ASSEMBLIES.—Subchapter II 

4 of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

5 the United States is amended by inserting in numer6 ical sequence the following new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.24 LCD panel assemblies for 

use in LCD projection type 

televisions (provided for in 

subheading 9013.80.90) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 

7 (3) PLASMA DISPLAY PANELS.—Subchapter II 

8 of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

9 the United States is amended by inserting in numer10 ical sequence the following new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.25 Plasma display panels for 

use in plasma flat screen 

televisions (provided for in 

subheading 8529.90.53 ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section apply with respect to goods entered, or with13 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

14 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7055
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALBERT WILLIAM LACY, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-88-35, CA-94-845-2) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert William Lacy, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Although the lower court erroneously stated that Appellant pled guilty to count 7 of the indictment, this error was harmless. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 61. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for transcripts at government expense, see 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1988), and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lacy, Nos. CR-88-35; CA-94- 845-2 (S.D.W. Va. June 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.3


H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    333 Clay Street, Suite 3850, Houston, Texas 77002 * TEL. (713) 739-1000
                              * FAX (713) 739-6112








                   CONSENT OF H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

We hereby consent to the use of the name H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. and of
references to H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. and to the inclusion of and
reference to our report, or information contained therein, dated May 21, 2003
prepared for Olympic Resources, Ltd. into the Registration Statement on Form
10KSB for Olympic Resources, Ltd. for the filing on June 27, 2003.


                                     H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                     By: /s/ Silvia Castilleja
                                     -------------------------
                                     Silvia Castilleja, P.E.
                                     Vice President


June 27, 2003
Houston, Texas
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, the undersigned,Richard N. Snyder, Chief Executive Officer of Forgent Networks, Inc. (the “Company”),do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended January 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/RICHARD N. SNYDER    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Richard N. Snyder       |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | March 14, 2007          |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Forgent Networks, Inc. and will be retainedby Forgent Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

----