alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                                   |  |                              
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                                               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                                   | 
|HTM Holdings, Inc.                                 |  | Delaware                     
|940862 Ontario Inc.                                |  | Ontario, Canada              
|Qualtron, Inc.                                     |  | Massachusetts                
|Radio Componentes de Mexico, S.A. de S.V.          |  | Mexico                       
|SMTC Asia Ltd.                                     |  | Hong Kong                    
|SMTC de Chihuahua S.A. de C.V.                     |  | Mexico                       
|SMTC Ireland Company                               |  | Ireland                      
|SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of California       |  | California                   
|SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Canada           |  | Ontario, Canada              
|SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Colorado         |  | Delaware                     
|SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Massachusetts    |  | Massachusetts                
|SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of North Carolina ( |  | North Carolina               
|SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Texas            |  | Texas                        
|SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Wisconsin        |  | Wisconsin                    
|SMTC Mex Holdings, Inc.                            |  | Delaware                     
|SMTC Nova Scotia Company                           |  | Nova Scotia, Canada          
|SMTC R&D Teoranta                                  |  | Ireland                      
|SMTC Teoranta                                      |  | Ireland
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 202ND DISTRICT COURT OF BOWIE COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 3rd 

day of September, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Reginald Reece, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00192-CR

Trial Court No. 11F0746-202

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Reginald Reece, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 5th day of November, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 142 (Monday, July 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37039-37040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17731]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; NIAAA-NOT-OD-09-058 Competitive 
Revision Supplement.
    Date: July 29-August 3, 2009.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).

[[Page 37040]]

    Contact Person: Ranga Srinivas, PhD, Chief, Extramural Project 
Review Branch, Office of Extramural Activities, National Institutes 
of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, 5635 
Fishers Lane, Room 2085, Rockville, MD 20852.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: July 20, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17731 Filed 7-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Enoc ALCANTARA-MENDEZ, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 12-6846.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 2012.

Decided: Jan. 4, 2013.

Jennifer Haynes Rose, Law Office of Jennifer Haynes Rose, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, David T. Huband, Assistant *204United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

After a hearing, the district court ordered that Enoc Alcantara-Mendez be committed to the custody of the Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2006). Counsel for Alcantara-Mendez filed a timely notice of appeal of the district court’s order. Prior to that notice of appeal, however, Alcantara-Mendez filed a separate pro se notice of appeal. As Alcantara-Mendez in that appeal challenged both the district court’s order denying reconsideration and the order committing him to the custody of the Attorney General, this court previously considered Alcantara-Mendez’s arguments regarding both of those orders. We, therefore, have already affirmed the district court’s order committing Alcantara-Mendez to the custody of the Attorney General. *See United States v. Alcantara-Mendez,*486 Fed.Appx. 359 (4th Cir.2012) (unpublished). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as duplicative.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

**We note that counsel for Alcantara-Mendez raises additional arguments to those raised in the prior appeal. Even if we considered these additional arguments to be properly before us we conclude that these arguments lack merit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,782,674
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,715,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 20,862,503
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      23,460,043
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        23,991,000
<LOANS>                                    248,656,319
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,279,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             306,962,340
<DEPOSITS>                                 207,005,902
<SHORT-TERM>                                50,297,189
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,438,706
<LONG-TERM>                                 15,668,288
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,336,295
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,215,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             306,962,340
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             14,338,887
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,137,175
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            16,476,062
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           6,411,206
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,409,244
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,066,818
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  234,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (2,578)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,239,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,377,966
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,377,966
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,417,555
<EPS-BASIC>                                      43.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    43.96
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.55
<LOANS-NON>                                 10,984,894
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             11,664,933
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,058,618
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   69,145
<RECOVERIES>                                    56,029
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,279,501
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      3,279,501



</TABLE>
[No. 54437-3-I.

Division One.

October 24, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Joseph Stanley Pigott, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-1-05925-7, Nicole Maclnnes, J., entered May 21, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J., concurred in by Becker and Schindler, JJ.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1"> The People of the State of New York, - <br><br>against<br><br>Gerratt J., Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Steven M. Statsinger, J.), rendered September 30, 2015, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Steven M. Statsinger, J.), rendered September 30, 2015, affirmed.</p><p>The accusatory instrument charging criminal mischief in the fourth degree (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 145.00[1]) was not jurisdictionally defective. The instrument alleges that during a domestic dispute inside his mother's apartment, defendant "hit one of the walls of the apartment with a closed fist, causing a hole to form in the wall" and that he did not have "permission or authority to damage and destroy the walls of the apartment." These allegations were sufficient for pleading purposes to establish that defendant "intentionally damage[d] property of another person" (Penal Law ยง 145.00[1]). Likewise, the instrument which contained allegations from the complainant mother that she wants defendant "out" of the apartment and "got him removed from the lease" supported the inference that complainant had an "ownership interest" (Penal Law ยง 145.13) in the property allegedly damaged (<i>see People v Jones</i>, 39 Misc 3d 135[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 50588[U][App Term, 1st Dept 2013], <i>lv denied </i>21 NY3d 1005 [2013]; Donnino, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law ยง 145.00, at 187-189).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: January 23, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Amended and Restated Exhibit A to the Investment Management Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.26 
 EXHIBIT A 
 FEE SCHEDULE 

AMENDED AND RESTATED as of January 1, 2013 
 This Amended and Restated Exhibit A is effective as of January 1, 2013, and is attached to and made a part of the Investment Management Agreement between Stateco Financial Services, Inc.
(“Stateco”) and American Compensation Insurance Company and Bloomington Compensation Insurance Company effective October 1, 2010. 
 Agreement 
 Except as amended or modified by mutual
agreement of the parties hereto, Stateco shall be paid an investment management fee every quarter based on a percentage of the average asset value of invested assets which average shall be calculated by adding the market value of invested assets at
the beginning of the quarter and at the end of the quarter, dividing that sum by two. 
 The annual fee for
fixed instruments including bonds (taxable and tax-free), invested cash and preferred stock is 20 basis points or .002 times the average asset value of that category of invested asset. 

The annual fee for all common stock portfolios is 50 basis points or .005 times the average asset value of that category
of invested assets. 
 In addition, as respects the common stock portfolios, Stateco shall be entitled to a
performance bonus based on the performance of the common stock portfolios determined in the following manner. 

In the event the total return on any common stock portfolio exceeds for a particular quarter the total return for the
S&P 500 for the same quarter, Stateco shall be paid an annual bonus of 10 basis points or .001 times the portion of the average asset value of the particular portfolio which exceeds the asset value of the same portfolio calculated based on the
actual total performance of the S&P 500 for the quarter in question. 
 [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] 








			
	STATECO FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert P. Restrepo, Jr.

		 	President
		 	
	AMERICAN COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert P. Restrepo, Jr.

		 	President
		 	
	BLOOMINGTON COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert P. Restrepo, Jr.

		 	President

 Agreemen/Investment Management-ACIC/BCIC Fee Schedule 1-1-13 

  
 2
ex10_24.htm



Exhibit 10.24


 


	
  

	
 

	
 

	
RECEIVED


	
Ambassadors Group

	
AUG 11 2006


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
PEOPLE TO PEOPLE INTERNATIONAL


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
August 8, 2006

	
 

	
Jeffrey D. Thomas


	
 

	
 

	
President and CEO


	
Mary Eisenhower

	
 

	
 


	
Chief Executive Officer

	
 

	
 


	
People to People International

	
 

	
 


	
501 East Armour Boulevard

	
 

	
 


	
Kansas City, MO 64109

	
 

	
 





 


Re:          General Contract, dated April 1, 1995, regarding adult exchange programs; General Contract, dated April 1, 1995, regarding student ambassador programs; Consent to Assignment Agreement, dated August 3, 1995; General Contract, dated July, 1, 1995, regarding adult exchange programs; Consent to Assignment Agreement, dated February 6, 1996; General Contract, dated February 12, 1999, regarding adult sports-related travel and exchange programs; General Contract, dated February 12, 1999, regarding student and youth sports-related and exchange programs; and Letter Agreement, dated February 13, 2001, regarding spin-off transaction (collectively, the “Existing Agreements”).


 


Dear Mary:


 


As you are aware, Ambassador Programs, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“AP”), currently operates adult and student/youth inbound and outbound travel and exchange programs in the United States pursuant to the Existing Agreements (the “U.S. Programs”). In addition to the U.S. Programs, AP intends to initiate and operate adult and student/youth inbound and outbound travel and exchange programs in Canada pursuant to the Existing Agreements (the “Canadian Programs”).


 


The purpose of this letter is to confirm that the Existing Agreements extend to the Canadian Programs and that all of the terms and conditions of the Existing Agreements also apply to the Canadian Programs.


 


If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please sign below.


 


	
 

	
Very truly yours,


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
/s/ Jeffrey D. Thomas


	
 

	
Jeffrey D. Thomas


	
 

	
Chief Executive Officer


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
PEOPLE TO PEOPLE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

	
 


	
a Missouri non-profit corporation

	
 


	
By:

	
/s/ Mary Eisenhower

	
 

	
 


	
Name: Mary Eisenhower

	
 


	
Title: Chief Executive Officer

	
 


	 	 	 	 



 


LA1565102.2


66666-6666


 


08/07/2006    Dwight D. Eisenhower Building |110 South Ferrall Street | Spokane, WA 99202-4800 USA


509-534-6200 | Fax 509-536-1996 | www.ambassadorsgroup.com
Case 2:11-cv-03823-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 12/09/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 53
Case 2:11-cv-03823-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 12/09/11 Page 2 of 9 PageID: 54
Case 2:11-cv-03823-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 12/09/11 Page 3 of 9 PageID: 55
Case 2:11-cv-03823-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 12/09/11 Page 4 of 9 PageID: 56
Case 2:11-cv-03823-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 12/09/11 Page 5 of 9 PageID: 57
Case 2:11-cv-03823-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 12/09/11 Page 6 of 9 PageID: 58
Case 2:11-cv-03823-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 12/09/11 Page 7 of 9 PageID: 59
Case 2:11-cv-03823-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 12/09/11 Page 8 of 9 PageID: 60
Case 2:11-cv-03823-DMC-MF Document 7 Filed 12/09/11 Page 9 of 9 PageID: 61
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5379

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit the timing of issuance 

of H–2B visas during a fiscal year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2004

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit 

the timing of issuance of H–2B visas during a fiscal year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON TIMING OF ISSUANCE OF H–2B 

4 VISAS DURING A FISCAL YEAR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 214(g)(1)(B) of the Im6 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(1)(B)) 

7 is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 

8 following: ‘‘, and may not exceed one-third of such number 

9 during the first 4 months of any fiscal year and two-third 
2

•HR 5379 IH 

1 of such number during the first 8 months of any fiscal 

2 year’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply beginning with fiscal year 2005.

Æ
EXHIBIT
10.4


SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS

2012 FISCAL YEAR


          Electro-Sensors,
Inc. (the “Company”) currently does not have written employment agreements with
its executive officers, who serve as “at-will” employees pursuant to oral
arrangements with the Company. For the 2012 fiscal year, the Company’s
executive officers were entitled to the base salaries set forth below.


	
  

 	
  

 
	
   Executive Officer and Title

 	
   2012 Annual Base Salary

 
	
   Bradley D.
 Slye 

   Chairman, President, CEO and CFO

 	
   $188,010

 


37
s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 10, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00785

- CV

Mary Ann CASTRO

, Appella nt

v.

Manuel CASTRO

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 15957 Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s counsel filed a motion for leave to file a motion to withdraw as counsel. A motion for leave is unnecessary if counsel wishes to withdraw. Counsel should simply file an

actual motion to withdraw in accordance with the rules. We have contacted counsel’s office by telephone on numerous occasions since the motion was filed, explai ning to counsel that she should move to withdraw the motion for leave and simply file a motion to withdraw. Despite assurances that this would be done, there have been no subsequent filings. Accordingly, we

DENY counsel’s motion of leave to file a motion to withdraw as counsel.

Moreover, a filing fee of $195.00 was due when this appeal was filed but it was not paid. See T EXAS S UPREME C OURT O RDER R EGARDING F EES C HARGED I N THE S UPREME
C OURT

, I N C IVIL C ASES I N THE C OURTS OF A PPEALS

, AND B EFO RE THE J UDICIAL P ANEL ON
M ULTIDISTRICT L ITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 13

- 9127, Aug. 16, 2013). The clerk of the court notified appellant of this deficiency in a letter dated November 12, 2014. Appellant was advised

the fee was due no later than November 24 , 2014. The fee remains unpaid. Rule 5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay

– at the time an item is presented for filing

– whatever fees are required by statu te or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5.We therefore ORDER appellant, not later than December 22, 2014 to either (1) pay the applicable filing fee, or (2) provide wri tten proof to this court that she is indigent or otherwise excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 20.1 (providing that indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may proceed with out advance payment of costs). If appellant fails to respond satisfactorily within the time ordered, this appeal will be dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3.

The clerk is ordered to serve copies of this order on appellant, all counsel, the d istrict clerk, and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my h and and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court