alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the
Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 5,
2007 of Stein Mart, Inc. (the Form 10-Q), I, Michael D. Fisher, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael D. Fisher                
|                    |  |  |  | Michael D. Fisher                    
|                    |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2009
    By:
    /s/ David R. AllenDavid R. AllenChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
# 2015

# 2016

# 2017

# 2018

# 2019

# 2020
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ALVIN EUGENE TURNER
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2704

[ March 21, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey J. Colbath , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2017

- CF

000377

- AXXX

- MB

.

Car ey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, G ROSS AND L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  TransAmerican  Holdings,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Najib  Choufani,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





DATE: APRIL 14, 2004              /s/ NAJIB CHOUFANI
                                  --------------------
                                  NAJIB CHOUFANI
                                  CHAIRMAN, CEO & CFO
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JAMES HILTON PARKER, III,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D20-785

September 15, 2021

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Peter F. 

Estrada, Judge.

William R. Ponall of Ponall Law, Maitland; and Lisabeth J. Fryer of 

Lisabeth J. Fryer, P.A., Sanford, for Appellant. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, C.J., and KELLY and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                 EXHIBIT (12)(A)
 
                       WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
                                ($ IN MILLIONS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                  -----------------------------------------------
                                                   1996       1995      1994      1993      1992
                                                  -------     -----     -----     -----     -----
<S>                                               <C>         <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes and
  minority interest............................   $(1,298)    $   2     $ (10)    $(233)    $ 267
Less: Equity in income (loss) of 50 percent or
  less owned affiliates........................         9         3        (2)       (3)       (1)
Add: Fixed charges.............................       484       254       155       186       200
                                                  -------     -----     -----     -----     -----
Earnings as adjusted...........................   $  (823)    $ 253     $ 147     $ (44)    $ 468
                                                  =======     =====     =====     =====     =====
Fixed charges:
     Interest expense..........................   $   456     $ 236     $ 134     $ 164     $ 169
     Rental expense............................        28        18        21        22        31
                                                  -------     -----     -----     -----     -----
Total fixed charges............................   $   484     $ 254     $ 155     $ 186     $ 200
                                                  =======     =====     =====     =====     =====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.............        (a)       (a)       (a)       (a)     2.34x
                                                  =======     =====     =====     =====     =====
</TABLE>
 
---------
 
(a) Additional income before income taxes and minority interest necessary to
    attain a ratio of 1.00x for 1996, 1995, 1994 and 1993 would be $1,307
    million, $1 million, $8 million, and $230 million, respectively.
Exhibit 3.1

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
PRIMEDIA INC.

PRIMEDIA Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the
"Corporation"),

DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY:



[signature page follows]

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation to be executed on this 1st day of August, 2007.

PRIMEDIA INC.By:

/s/JASON S. THALERName: Jason S. Thaler
Title:Senior Vice President


---
[No. 55163-9-I.

Division One.

November 28, 2005.]

#### Jodi Lynn Alexander, *Appellant,*v. Michelle Naden et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-2-20143-1, Cheryl B. Carey, J., entered October 1, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J., concurred in by Cox, C.J., and Ellington, J.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 829

To amend the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act to increase the amount 

of loss or damage coverage, in the aggregate and for single exhibitions, 

authorized by such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Ms. MCCOLLUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act to increase 

the amount of loss or damage coverage, in the aggregate 

and for single exhibitions, authorized by such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arts and Artifacts In5 demnity Act Amendments of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 Section 5 of the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act 

8 (20 U.S.C. 974) is amended—
2

•HR 829 IH 

1 (1) in subsection (b) by striking 

2 ‘‘$5,000,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$8,000,000,000’’, 

3 (2) in subsection (c) by striking 

4 ‘‘$500,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$750,000,000’’, and 

5 (3) in subsection (d)—

6 (A) in paragraph (4) by striking 

7 ‘‘$200,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$200,000,000’’, 

8 (B) in paragraph (6)—

9 (i) by striking ‘‘chapter’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘Act’’, and 

11 (ii) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end, 

12 (C) in paragraph (7)—

13 (i) by striking ‘‘$400,000,000 or 

14 more, then coverage under this chapter’’ 

15 and inserting ‘‘not less than $400,000,000 

16 but less than $500,000,000, then coverage 

17 under this Act’’, and 

18 (ii) by striking the period at the end 

19 and inserting ‘‘; or’’, and 

20 (D) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(8) $500,000,000 or more, the coverage under 

22 this Act shall extend only to loss or damage in ex23 cess of the first $500,000 of loss or damage to items 

24 covered.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Slippery Rock Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William C. Sonntag, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William C. Sonntag
-----------------------------

Chief Executive Officer



November 14, 2002
# TRC

# DAFW
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 6885-009-CA]


Cinnamon Ranch Hydroelectric Project; Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

July 16, 2009.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR part 
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has 
reviewed the application for a subsequent license for the Cinnamon 
Ranch Hydroelectric Project, and has prepared an Environmental 
Assessment. The operating project is located on Pellisier Creek, Middle 
Creek, and Birch Creek, in the Hammil Valley area of Mono County, near 
the Town of Benton, California. The project occupies 0.13 acre of U.S. 
Forest Service lands within the Inyo National Forest and 7.53 acres of 
lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management.
    The EA contains the staff's analysis of the potential environmental 
impacts of the project and concludes that relicensing the project would 
not constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect 
the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA is available for review at the Commission in the 
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at 
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket 
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98deddcadbd7f6f4f1f6fdcbede8e8f7eaecd8fefdeafbb6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bcdced9c8c4e5e7e2e5eed8fefbfbe4f9ffcbedeef9e8a5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, 
(202) 502-8659.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm to be notified via e-mail of new filings and 
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, 
contact FERC Online Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0b6b5a2b3bf9e9c999e95a38580809f8284b096958293de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e484b5c4d41606267606b5d7b7e7e617c7a4e686b7c6d20696178">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free 
at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    Please contact Gaylord Hoisington by telephone at (202) 502-6032 or 
by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc9b9d8590938e98d29493958f95929b889392bc9a998e9fd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="badddbc3d6d5c8de94d2d5d3c9d3d4ddced5d4fadcdfc8d994ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a> if you have any questions.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17506 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in each prospectus constituting
part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-30729, 33-41417, and
33-41475), and on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-92085, 33-44044, 33-45365, 33-46779,
33-51445, 33-51579, 33-53815, 33-53819, 33-62043, 33-62045, 333-12583,
333-12589, 333-12591, 333-13219, 333-30127, 333-23661, 333-23663, and 333-37497)
of CBS Corporation of our report dated January 28, 1998 appearing on page 24 of
this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
on the financial statement schedule, which appears on page 55 of this Form 10-K.
 
/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 24, 1998
 
                                CBS CORPORATION
                                       65
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43536

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ESTEVAN JUNIOR REYNA,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 514

Filed: May 2, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bonneville County. Hon. Bruce L. Pickett, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of ten years, with three 

years determinate, for felony operating a motor vehicle while under the influence 

and five years, with two years determinate, for felony eluding a police officer, 

affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Brian R. Dickson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Estevan Junior Reyna pled guilty to felony operating a motor vehicle while under the 

influence, Idaho Code §§ 18-8004, 18-8005(9), and felony eluding a police officer, I.C. § 49-

1404(1)(2)(c). The district court imposed concurrent unified sentences of ten years, with three 

years determinate, for driving under the influence and five years, with two years determinate, for 

eluding. Reyna appeals, contending that his sentences are excessive.
2

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Reyna’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Infinite Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Smith,
        Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
        as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
        be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
        request.




Date:
                August 11, 2006
            
            /s/
                MICHAEL S. SMITHMichael
                S. Smith
              Chief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                Officer
#### Ricky BROOKS, Appellant v. Janet Ann NAPOLITANO, in her Official Capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al., Appellees.

No. 12-5105.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 2, 2013.

Gony Frieder Goldberg, David A. Borer, American Federation of Government Employees, Washington, DC, for Appellant.

Lindsey Powell, Charles Wylie Scarborough, Marleigh D. Dover, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Ap-pellees.

Before: BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges, and RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge.

*7
      *JUDGMENT*

This case is before us on appeal from the district court’s grant of the appellees’ motion to dismiss. The issues were considered on the record and the briefs submitted by the parties. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. R. 34(j). The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. *See*D.C.Cir. R. 36(d). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s February 8, 2012, order granting the appellees’ motion to dismiss the appellant’s complaint be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 542

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT

To repeal the reservation of mineral rights made by the 

United States when certain lands in Livingston Parish, 

Louisiana, were conveyed by Public Law 102–562.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 542 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF RESERVATION OF MINERAL 

2 RIGHTS, LIVINGSTON PARISH, LOUISIANA. 

3 Section 102 of Public Law 102–562 (106 Stat. 4234) 

4 is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’; 

6 (2) by striking ‘‘and subject to the reservation 

7 in subsection (b),’’; and 

8 (3) by striking subsection (b). 

9 SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF AMENDMENT. 

10 The Secretary of the Interior shall execute the legal 

11 instruments necessary to effectuate the amendment made 

12 by subsection (a)(3) of section 1.

Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
#### Henry W. Wiggins, as Trustee, Plaintiff, *v.*The Neversink Light and Power Company, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Orange Special Term,

May, 1905.)

Receiver — Certificates of indebtedness — Motion for leave to issue denied.

While a court of equity may authorize the receiver of a public service corporation to issue certificates of indebtedness to raise money to do repairs, or obtain supplies to keep the service going, and make such certificates prior liens to a mortgage, a motion by the receiver of a corporation, not engaged in such a service, for leave to issue like certificates, with like effect, will be denied.

Motion by the receiver, appointed in this action to foreclose a mortgage, for leave to issue certificates of indebtedness to raise money to put the plant of the company in a condition to run; such certificates to be a lien prior to the mortgage. The company is not engaged in any public service of lighting but only sells electricity to other companies.

W. B. Boyce for motion.

Homblower, Byrne, Miller & Potter opposed.

Gaynor, J.:

In the case of corporations engaged in a public service, like railroad, water and lighting companies, and which service cannot be interrupted without inconvenience and harm to the community, courts of equity authorize its receivers of such corporations to issue certificates of indebtedness to raise money to do repairs or obtain supplies to keep the service going, and make such certificates prior liens to the mortgage indebtedness.

But in the case of corporations not engaged in such a service, there is no such practice. It is justified only on the score of public necessity, and even when so exercised has become a great abuse and wrong to mortgage bondholders in many instances, as we all know. In the time at my disposal I cannot cite or discuss the authorities.

The motion is denied.