alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 1 of 22 PageID: 655
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 2 of 22 PageID: 656
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 3 of 22 PageID: 657
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 4 of 22 PageID: 658
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 5 of 22 PageID: 659
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 6 of 22 PageID: 660
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 7 of 22 PageID: 661
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 8 of 22 PageID: 662
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 9 of 22 PageID: 663
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 10 of 22 PageID: 664
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 11 of 22 PageID: 665
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 12 of 22 PageID: 666
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 13 of 22 PageID: 667
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 14 of 22 PageID: 668
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 15 of 22 PageID: 669
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 16 of 22 PageID: 670
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 17 of 22 PageID: 671
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 18 of 22 PageID: 672
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 19 of 22 PageID: 673
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 20 of 22 PageID: 674
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 21 of 22 PageID: 675
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 22 Filed 04/17/12 Page 22 of 22 PageID: 676
Exhibit 32

                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer and the chief financial
officer of Peoples Bancorporation, Inc., each hereby certifies that, to the best
of his knowledge,  the accompanying  Form 10-Q of the issuer fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section  13(a)or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934,  and that  information  contained in the report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
issuer.

August 14, 2008

                                          s/R. Riggie Ridgeway
                                          -------------------------------
                                           R. Riggie Ridgeway
                                           Chief Executive Officer


                                          s/Robert E. Dye, Jr.
                                          -------------------------------
                                           Robert E. Dye, Jr.
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby
certifies in his capacity as an officer of Vail Resorts, Inc. (the “Company”)
that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October
31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and the results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the
periods covered by such Report.








Date:
December 8, 2009





/s/
      Robert A.
      KatzRobert
      A. KatzChief
      Executive Officer








Date:
December 8, 2009





/s/
      Jeffrey W.
      JonesJeffrey
      W. JonesSenior
      Executive Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer








This
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers,
and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by each of the above
signatories to the extent of his respective knowledge.  This
certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Vail Resorts, Inc.
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Vail Resorts, Inc. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### J. Paul DONOHUE, Plaintiff, v. The W. W. SLY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant.

Civ. No. 31386.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

Oct. 29, 1956.

*21Robert M. Weh, Cleveland, Ohio, Arthur G. Connolly, Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

A. J. Hudson, S. J. Boughton, Sheldon S. Reynolds, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

JONES, Chief Judge.

The defendant objects to certain interrogatories propounded by the plaintiff on the ground that they seek discovery as to damages prior to the determination of patent infringement.

Defendant, cites a case which contains the general principles applicable to discovery as to damages, though not one of patent infringement. Reference is made here to the case of Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co., 1933, 289 U.S. 698, 53 S.Ct. 736, 737, 77 L.Ed. 1449, where the Court states:

> “There are times when a suit is triable in separate parts, one affecting the right or liability, and the other affecting the measure of recovery. In suits of that order a discovery as to damages will commonly be postponed till the right or liability has been established or declared. * * *

> “A different situation is presented where the action is at law and is triable by judge and jury. There interlocutory judgments are unknown * * In such circum-

> stances damages may be proved with the aid of a discovery, if the complication of accounts or other practical impediments make it necessary that the evidence be sifted in advance. * * *

> “To hold that the plaintiff in an action at law may have discovery of damages is not to say that the remedy will be granted as of course, or that protection will not be given to his adversary against impertinent intrusion. * * * It is all a matter of discretion. * * *”

The objections to interrogatories will be denied.
ALASKA

CALIF.

ARIZ.

NEV.

N.M.

HAWAII

ARK.

TEXAS

COLO.

UTAH

OKLA.

KAN. MO.

IDAHO

WYO.

ORE.

WASH.

MONT.

IOWA NEB.

S.D.

MINN.

N.D.

ALA.

LA.

MISS.

FLA.

TENN.

ILL.

KY.

GA.

S.C.

N.C.

VA.

W.VA.

D.C.

IND.

OHIO

MICH.

PA.

WIS.

MD.

DEL.

N.Y.

N.J.

VT.

CONN.

MASS. N.H.

R.I.

MAINE

New England

Middle

Atlantic

East

North Central

West

North Central

Pacific

Mountain

South Central

West

East

South Central

South 

Atlantic

 Unemployment rate

 6.5% or higher

 5.5% - 6.4%

 4.5% - 5.4%

 3.5% - 4.4%

 3.4% or lower

Chart 1-3. In 2005, unemployment rates were lowest in the 

South Atlantic States and highest in the East North Central 

States

NOTE: Data are 2005 annual averages.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

• In 2005, Hawaii reported the lowest unemployment rate among the states, 2.8 

percent. North Dakota had the next lowest rate, 3.4 percent, closely followed 

by Vermont and Virginia, 3.5 percent each. The highest rates were recorded in 

Mississippi and Louisiana (7.9 and 7.1 percent, respectively), reflecting the 

impact of the Gulf Coast hurricanes.

• The largest unemployment rate declines from 2004 to 2005 occurred in 

Alabama and Oregon (-1.2 percentage points each). 

• The largest jobless rate increases for 2005 were recorded by the two states most 

affected by the Gulf Coast hurricanes: Mississippi (+1.6 percentage points) and 

Louisiana (+1.4 percentage points).

Chart 1-3. In 2005, unemployment rates were lowest in the 

South Atlantic States and highest in the East North Central 

States
----

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania        March 21, 2002
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our reports dated March 15, 2006, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Watsco, Inc. and subsidiaries, Watsco Inc. and subsidiaries managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of Watsco, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders of Watsco, Inc. and subsidiaries. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Watsco, Inc. and
subsidiaries of the aforementioned reports.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the aforementioned reports in the following
Registration Statements:



|(1) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-7758, No.33-37982, No. 333-00371, No. 333-01441 and No. 333-19803) of Watsco, Inc. and subsidiaries,
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-10363, No. 333-80341, No. 333-39380 and No. 333-126824) pertaining to the Watsco, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1996
Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-82011, No. 33-51934 and No. 33-72798) pertaining to the Watsco, Inc. Amended and Restated 1991 Stock Option Plan, and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-86006) pertaining to the 2001 Incentive Compensation Plan;
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Miami, Florida

March 15, 2006
EX-10.68



 Exhibit 10.68 

 
  

 
 Re: Warrant No.
W-         
 Dear
                    : 
 This letter agreement will memorialize your agreement with respect to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in a warrant to purchase common stock of Cancer Genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), held by you. The promises set forth in this letter agreement are made to induce us and our underwriters to proceed with the initial public offering, which is also beneficial to you. 

Subject only to the consummation of an initial public offering of the Company’s common stock within the next 60 days, and effective
immediately after the initial public offering, you hereby irrevocably agree to amend the terms of Warrant No. W-__ (the “Warrant”) with respect to all of the shares of the Company’s common stock underlying such warrant by eliminating
the full ratchet anti-dilution protection contained in such warrant. In order to accomplish this amendment, you hereby agree that sections (f)(2) and (f)(4) through (9) of the Warrant are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the
following “Intentionally Omitted.” Any other warrants to purchase Common Stock of the Company held by you shall not be affected by the amendment set forth herein. A summary of your Warrant at original issuance and effective post splits is
attached as Exhibit A. 
 Very truly yours, 

Panna L. Sharma 
 President and CEO 
  

			
	Agreed to and Accepted by:	 	
		
	 	 	 
		
	 	 	(Warrant Holder)








 Exhibit A 
 Effect of Reverse Splits on Warrant 
 Warrant No.
W-        _ 
  

									
	 	  	Number of
Shares	 	  	Exercise Price
Per Share	 
	 Original Issuance
	  	 	        ,000	  	  	$	5.00	  
	 Post 1 for 2 Reverse Split Effective February 8, 2013
	  	 	        ,000	  	  	$	10.00	  
	 Post 1 for 2.5 Reverse Split Effective on or about February 28, 2013
	  	 	        ,000	  	  	$	25.00
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7302

JOHN GRIMES WELLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HAROLD THOMAS, Sergeant, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-625-1) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 17, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Grimes Wells, Appellant Pro Se. William Dennis Worley, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wells v. Thomas , No. CA-96-625-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Infinite Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James Witzel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 13, 2011





/s/ James WitzelJames WitzelChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**

I, Henry Fahman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CATALYST RESOURCE GROUP, INC.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the year covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the years presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the year in which this report is being prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the year covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors;

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 31, 2011

 /s/ Henry Fahman         

Henry Fahman

Interim Chief Executive/Financial Officer

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      26,718,090
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  846,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,580,701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,241,248
<PP&E>                                       9,783,610
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,388,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,818,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,348,915
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        7,831,440
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,150
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,818,446
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               339,054
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,992,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,358,138)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,358,138)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)


</TABLE>
# laucnty93

&8Page &P of &N
# Unpaid eldercare in the United States

The Unpaid eldercare in the United States release presents information on the number and characteristics of people who provide eldercare and the amount of time they spend providing that care. These are people who provide such care informally rather than being paid to do so. Estimates in this release are based on data from the American Time Use Survey.

- In 2021-22, 14% of the U.S. population, or 37.1 million people, provide unpaid eldercare
- In 2017-18, 16% of the U.S. population, or 40.4 million people, provide unpaid eldercare
- In 2015-16, 16% of the U.S. population, or 41.3 million people, provide unpaid eldercare
- In 2013-14, 47% of the 40.4 million eldercare providers in the U.S. work full time
- Unpaid eldercare provided by 16 percent of the population in 2011-2012
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 95 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 95

To make amounts provided under the Operation Safe Home and New Approach 
  Anti-Drug programs available for use for providing law enforcement 
  officers to patrol and provide security for housing assisted by the 
              Department of Housing and Urban Development.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

Mr. Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make amounts provided under the Operation Safe Home and New Approach 
  Anti-Drug programs available for use for providing law enforcement 
  officers to patrol and provide security for housing assisted by the 
              Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``HUD Housing Security and Flexibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF OPERATION SAFE HOME AND SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT AMOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
field office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development that 
receives or administers grants amounts under the Operation Safe Home 
program of the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of 
Housing and Urban Development or under the New Approach Anti-Drug 
program of such Department may use such amounts to enter into 
contracts, having terms of not more than 3 years, with law enforcement 
officers or agencies described in subsection (b) to provide security, 
patrols, or other protective services for housing that is owned or held 
by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, or is assisted under 
a program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and is 
within the jurisdiction or purview of such field office.
    (b) Law Enforcement Officers and Agencies.--A law enforcement 
officer or agency described in this subsection is a law enforcement 
officer that is authorized, under Federal or State law, to make 
arrests, or a public agency whose officers have such authority.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Richard Damron, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and  2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date: August 10, 2007 /s/J. Richard Damron, Jr.         J. Richard Damron, Jr    President and Chief Executive Officer    (principal executive officer) and Director  
26