alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE

GUARDIANSHIP OF THE PERSON 

AND ESTATE OF MARIA G. 

ENRIQUEZ, A PERSON OF 

DIMINISHED CAPACITY.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00360-CV

Appeal from the

Probate Court No. 2

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2013-CGD00814)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant, Norma J. Enriquez, has not filed a 

brief or a motion for extension of time to file her brief, we dismiss the appeal.

This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the 

Appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation 

for such failure. TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 

(Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no pet.). On April 10, 2014, we notified Appellant that her brief 

was past due and no motion for extension of time to file a brief had been received. The letter 

also informed her of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, 

within ten days of the notice, she responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. Appellant 
- 2 -

has not filed a response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 

TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

May 14, 2014

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of PetroChina Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhou Mingchun, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: April 26, 2012
[No. 32012-6-II.

Division Two.

November 1, 2005.]

#### John Somarakis, *Appellant,*v. Charlie M. Ricks et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 02-2-04362-7, Barbara D. Johnson, J., entered July 15, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., and Morgan, J. Pro Tern.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Alaska, California, Hawaii, and Nevada)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, August 19, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, August 19, 2009, at 2 p.m. Pacific Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. 
For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, 
WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 16, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-17479 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dominique McNEELY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10510

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jerry Van Beard, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Sam L. Ogan, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, for DefendanL-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dominique McNeely has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). McNeely has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under thé limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3389

_____________________________ C URTIS L. R OBINSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court f or Duval County

. Marianne L. Aho , Judge

. April 2, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and B ILBREY and J AY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.33 0 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Curtis L. Robinson, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                MAJOR SUBSIDIARIES OF PETROCHINA COMPANY LIMITED

I.    WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES

1.    Daqing Oilfield Limited Company

II.   CONTROLLED SUBSIDIARIES

1.    Liaohe Jinma Oilfield Company Limited (99.49% owned by us)

2.    Daqing Yu Shu Lin Oilfield Company Limited (88.16% owned by us)

3.    Jilin Chemical Industrial Company Limited (99.61% owned by us)

4.    Jinzhou Petrochemical Limited Company (98.92% owned by us)

5.    CNPC Exploration and Development Company Limited (50% owned by us)

                                       1
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5094

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow withdrawals from 

individual retirement plans without penalty by individuals within areas 

determined by the President to be disaster areas by reason of certain 

natural disasters occurring in 2004. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2004

Mr. FOLEY (for himself, Mr. SHAW, Mr. BOYD, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. 

MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. GOSS, 

Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, 

Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. KELLER, Ms. GINNY

BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. 

DEUTSCH, Mr. MICA, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. CAMP, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. 

WELLER, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. BURTON

of Indiana, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, and Mr. PICKERING) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow withdrawals from individual retirement plans without penalty 

by individuals within areas determined by the President 

to be disaster areas by reason of certain natural disasters 

occurring in 2004.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5094 IH 

1 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY EXPANSION OF PENALTY-FREE 

2 WITHDRAWALS FROM INDIVIDUAL RETIRE3 MENT PLANS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITHIN CER4 TAIN DISASTER AREAS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 72(t) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 10-percent 

7 additional tax on early distributions from qualified retire8 ment plans) is amended by adding at the end the following 

9 new subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(G) DISTRIBUTIONS FROM RETIREMENT

11 PLANS TO VICTIMS OF CERTAIN NATURAL DIS12 ASTERS OCCURRING IN 2004.—Any distribution 

13 from an individual retirement plan to an indi14 vidual who resides within, or holds real property 

15 located within, an area determined by the Presi16 dent to warrant assistance from the Federal 

17 Government under the Robert T. Stafford Dis18 aster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act by 

19 reason of hurricane, flood, or other natural dis20 aster at least part of which occurred in calendar 

21 year 2004 if such distribution is made within 6 

22 months after the date of the disaster declara23 tion. Distributions shall not be taken into ac24 count under the preceding sentence if such dis25 tributions are described in subparagraph (A), 

26 (D), (E), or (F) or to the extent paragraph (1) 
3

•HR 5094 IH 

1 does not apply to such distributions by reason 

2 of subparagraph (B).’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to distributions received in taxable 

5 years beginning after December 31, 2003.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information  extracted from the Balance
Sheets for 24 HOUR AUCTION INC. at August 31, 2000 (audited) and the Statement
of Operations for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2000 (audited) and is
qualified  in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000

<CASH>                                           3,608
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,608
<PP&E>                                           4,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (876)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,239
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0

<COMMON>                                           366
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,239
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,483
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (15,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15,483)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)








</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-19-00576-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

PATRICIA GONZALEZ GONZALEZ, Appellant,

V.

JAIME RUIZ PEREZ, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 92nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the agreed, joint motion to abate appeal pending 

settlement negotiations and further action by trial court to allow the parties the opportunity 

to engage in settlement negotiations, via mediation, and a follow-up hearing at the trial 

court. 
2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the 

agreed, joint motion to abate, is of the opinion that the agreed, joint motion to abate the 

appeal pending settlement should be granted. The joint motion to abate the appeal 

pending settlement is GRANTED and this appeal is ordered ABATED. 

The Court directs appellants to file, on or before February 10, 2020, either (1) a 

motion to reinstate the appeal, or (2) a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to 

settlement.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed this

the 29th day of January, 2020.
#### W. A. DOODY CO. et al. v. B. T. ADAMS & CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 20, 1903.)

No. 1,232.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia.

Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Finding no element of fraud or illegal preference in this case, the decree of the District Court is in all respects affirmed.
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

49. Certification and licensing status of the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years and over by

employment status, 2023 annual averages

Employment status

Number of persons (in thousands) Percent distribution

Total

With a certification or license1

Total

With a certification or license1

Total

With a

certification,

but no

license

With a

license2

Without

a

certification

or

license

Total

With a

certification,

but no

license

With a

license2

Without

a

certification

or

license

Civilian noninstitutional population............ 266,942 45,138 4,671 40,468 221,804 100.0 16.9 1.7 15.2 83.1

Civilian labor force........................... 167,116 39,515 4,114 35,401 127,601 100.0 23.6 2.5 21.2 76.4

Employed................................... 161,037 38,793 4,018 34,775 122,244 100.0 24.1 2.5 21.6 75.9

Usually work full time................... 134,056 33,809 3,639 30,169 100,247 100.0 25.2 2.7 22.5 74.8

Usually work part time................. 26,981 4,984 379 4,606 21,996 100.0 18.5 1.4 17.1 81.5

Unemployed................................ 6,080 722 96 627 5,357 100.0 11.9 1.6 10.3 88.1

Not in the labor force........................ 99,826 5,623 557 5,067 94,202 100.0 5.6 0.6 5.1 94.4

1 A person may have more than one certification or license.

2 Persons with a license may also have a certification.

NOTE: Certifications are issued by a non-governmental certification body and convey that an individual has the knowledge or skill to perform a

specific job. A license is awarded by a government agency and conveys a legal authority to work in an occupation. Full time is 35 hours or more per

week; part time is less than 35 hours. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01



   Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-110160, 333-101174, 333-123895, and 333-64228 and Form S-8
Nos. 333-114953, 333-69552, and 333-55886) of AtheroGenics, Inc., of our reports
dated March 9, 2006, with respect to the financial statements of AtheroGenics,
Inc., AtheroGenics, Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of AtheroGenics, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.





                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 9, 2006
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

  In connection with theReport on Form 10-Q of TMP Inland Empire VI, (the “Company”) forthe period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, DanStephenson, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

```

           1.    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of  Section
                 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and
```

```

           2.    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                 all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                 operations of the Company Intentionally omitted;
```

                                            Date: November 21, 2005                         By:
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Infinite Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James Witzel, Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.





Dated:
      May 15, 2008





/s/
                James WitzelJames
                WitzelChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.30



 Exhibit 10.30 
 AMENDMENT #2 
 TO THE 

DEFERRED BONUS PLAN FOR 
 EXECUTIVES OF BRYN MAWR BANK CORPORATION 
 (As Amended and Restated
Effective January 1, 2008) 
 THIS AMENDMENT is made this 20th day of December, 2012, by Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation
(hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation”). 
 W I T N E S S
E T H: 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation maintains the Deferred Bonus Plan for Executives of Bryn Mawr Bank
Corporation, as last amended and restated effective January 1, 2008 (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation
deems it necessary and desirable to amend the Plan to enable the Administrator, in its discretion, to terminate a Participant’s interest in the Plan by making a single, lump sum distribution of the entire value of the Participant’s
Account. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by revising Article V thereof by adding a new Section 5.4 to read as
follows, provided that this Amendment shall not be effective with respect to any Participant who has an Account balance under the Plan as of the date of this Amendment: 

5.4 Small Cash-Outs. Effective January 1, 2013, and notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan or any
election made hereunder, the Administrator, in its discretion, may direct that a Participant’s entire Account balance, plus the amount standing to the credit of the Participant under any other plans, agreements, methods, programs or other
arrangements with respect to which deferrals of compensation are treated as having been deferred under a single plan under Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(c)(2), be distributed to him or her in a single lump sum, provided that the amount
of such distribution does not exceed the applicable dollar amount under Section 402(g)(1)(B) of the Code (e.g., $17,500 for 2013) . 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officers and its corporate seal to be impressed hereon on the date first above written. 

 

							
	ATTEST:	 		 	BRYN MAWR BANK CORPORATION
				
	 Diane McDonald
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Geoffrey L. Halberstadt


  

									
	I hereby consent to the application of this Amendment.	  	
				
	Participant Name:	 	  
	  		  	


									
					
	  
	 		 	  
	  		  	


									
	Signature                    	 		  	  date
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 783 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 783

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to carry out a project to 
        widen Interstate Route 35 East in Denton County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2003

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to carry out a project to 
        widen Interstate Route 35 East in Denton County, Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North Texas Mobility Improvement Act 
of 2003''.

SEC. 2. HIGH PRIORITY HIGHWAY PROJECT, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS.

    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary of Transportation is 
authorized to carry out a project to widen from 4 to 6 lanes Interstate 
Route 35 East between Farm-to-Market Road 2181 and Lake Lewisville in 
Denton County, Texas.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated out of the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit 
Account) to carry out this section $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2004.
    (c) Treatment as High Priority Project.--Funds made available to 
carry out this section shall be available for obligation in the same 
manner as if the funds were allocated to a State under section 117 of 
title 23, United States Code, except that the allocation percentages 
specified in subsection (b) of that section shall not apply.
                                 <all>
```