alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 780 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 780

 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for the 
 implementation of the program under section 804 of such Act, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2003

 Mr. Berry (for himself, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, Mr. 
 Holden, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Turner of Texas, Mr. Scott of Georgia, Ms. 
 Loretta Sanchez of California, Mr. Moore, Mr. Hill, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. 
    Cramer, Ms. Harman, Mr. Israel, Ms. Slaughter, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. 
   Sanders, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Frost, and Mr. Hinchey) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for the 
 implementation of the program under section 804 of such Act, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prescription Drug Price Reduction 
Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 804 OF FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND 
              COSMETIC ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 804 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 384) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (l); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection (l).
    (b) Regulations.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
promulgate a final rule for carrying out section 804 of the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act not later than one year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act. The effective date for such final rule may 
not be later than 30 days after the date on which the final rule is 
promulgated.
    (c) Labeling.--Section 502 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (21 U.S.C. 352) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(w) If it is a covered product imported into the United States 
pursuant to section 804, unless, upon commercial distribution of such 
product in the United States, the product bears labeling that 
identifies the country from which the product was imported, that 
provides the name and address of the importer of the product, and that 
provides the name and address of the person who exported the product to 
the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4746-4747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1697]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than February 9, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:

[[Page 4747]]

    1. David Weir Wood, II, Laura Halsey Wood, John Halsey Wood, David 
Weir Wood, II, Sidney Wood Clap, Katherine Wood Hamilton, all of 
Birmingham, Alabama, and Susan Soule Wood, Pensacola, Florida; to 
acquire additional shares of Capital South Bancorp, and its subsidiary 
CapitalSouth Bank, both of Birmingham, Alabama.
    2. Harold B. Dunn, Birmingham, Alabama, Harold Crockett Dunn, 
Salinas, California, and Rebecca Dunn Bryant, Fairhope, Alabama; to 
acquire additional voting shares of CapitalSouth Bancorp, and its 
subsidiary, CapitalSouth Bank, both of Birmingham, Alabama.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offerbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Matthew A. Michaelis, New York, New York, and Amy L. Madsen, 
Wichita, Kansas, as proposed trustees of the M.D. Michaelis Trust F, 
the Paula Sue Michaelis Trust F, the Matthew Michaelis Trust F, the Amy 
Loflin Trust F, and the Laura Haunschild Trust F, all dated October 27, 
2003, Wichita, Kansas; to acquire voting shares of Emprise Financial 
Corporation, and thereby acquire shares of Emprise Bank, both in 
Wichita, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 22, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-1697 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Innovative Systems Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bondy Tan, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  July 14, 2006

 

/s/ Bondy Tan                                                  

Signature:  Bondy Tan 
| Title:    President, Secretary, Treasurer and |
|---------------------------------------------------------|

Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

D/JCU/724740.1
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 980

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand Medicare coverage 

of certain self-injected biologicals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2003

Ms. DUNN (for herself, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. PICKERING, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. 

INSLEE, Mr. CRANE, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. DICKS, Mr. HASTINGS of 

Washington, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. 

PAUL, and Mr. FROST) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand 

Medicare coverage of certain self-injected biologicals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Innovation 

5 for Medicare Patients Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 980 IH 

1 SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF SELF-INJECTED 

2 BIOLOGICALS. 

3 (a) COVERAGE.—Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social Se4 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara6 graph (U); 

7 (2) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara8 graph (V); and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(W) a self-injected biological (which is ap12 proved by the Food and Drug Administration) that 

13 is prescribed as a complete replacement for a drug 

14 or biological that would otherwise be described in 

15 subparagraph (A) or (B);’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply to biologicals furnished on or 

18 after January 1, 2004.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT SET FORTH IN THE REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED 8-1-98 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                       1,592,635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 13,848,344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,225,373
<PP&E>                                       5,379,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,604,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,168,886
<BONDS>                                     11,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,889
<COMMON>                                        28,562
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,158,474)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,604,676
<SALES>                                     35,013,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,013,126
<CGS>                                       23,874,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,874,269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,184,777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             846,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,892,876)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,892,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,892,876)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Focus  Enhancements,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Brett  Moyer,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/Brett Moyer


Brett Moyer
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002
Table 8. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population 25 to 64 years of age by educational 

attainment and sex, 2007 annual averages 

(Numbers in thousands)

 Civilian labor force 

 Employed Unemployed 

 Total 

Percent 

of 

population 

 Total 

 Percent 

of labor 

force 

Total

Total, 25 to 64 years........................... 158,230 125,104 79.1 120,558 76.2 4,545 3.6 33,126

 Less than a high school diploma......... 18,309 11,651 63.6 10,801 59.0 850 7.3 6,658

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 47,949 36,569 76.3 34,947 72.9 1,622 4.4 11,380

 Some college or associate degree...... 42,625 34,599 81.2 33,371 78.3 1,227 3.5 8,026

 College graduates, total................... 49,347 42,285 85.7 41,439 84.0 846 2.0 7,062

 Bachelor's degree........................... 32,755 27,783 84.8 27,174 83.0 609 2.2 4,972

 Master's degree............................ 12,014 10,348 86.1 10,166 84.6 182 1.8 1,666

 Professional degree........................ 2,618 2,371 90.6 2,340 89.4 31 1.3 247

 Doctoral degree.............................. 1,960 1,784 91.0 1,759 89.7 25 1.4 177

Women

Total, 25 to 64 years......................... 80,491 57,791 71.8 55,675 69.2 2,116 3.7 22,700

 Less than a high school diploma......... 8,538 4,124 48.3 3,770 44.2 354 8.6 4,414

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 23,771 16,139 67.9 15,440 65.0 699 4.3 7,633

 Some college or associate degree...... 22,905 17,382 75.9 16,740 73.1 642 3.7 5,523

 College graduates, total..................... 25,277 20,146 79.7 19,726 78.0 421 2.1 5,131

 Bachelor's degree......................... 17,013 13,320 78.3 13,022 76.5 298 2.2 3,694

 Master's degree............................ 6,539 5,338 81.6 5,238 80.1 100 1.9 1,201

 Professional degree........................ 1,017 868 85.3 855 84.1 13 1.5 149

 Doctoral degree.............................. 708 621 87.7 611 86.3 10 1.6 87

Men

Total, 25 to 64 years........................... 77,739 67,313 86.6 64,883 83.5 2,429 3.6 10,426

 Less than a high school diploma......... 9,772 7,527 77.0 7,031 72.0 496 6.6 2,244

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 24,178 20,431 84.5 19,507 80.7 924 4.5 3,747

 Some college or associate degree...... 19,720 17,216 87.3 16,631 84.3 585 3.4 2,504

 College graduates, total..................... 24,070 22,138 92.0 21,714 90.2 425 1.9 1,931

 Bachelor's degree......................... 15,741 14,463 91.9 14,152 89.9 311 2.2 1,278

 Master's degree.............................. 5,475 5,010 91.5 4,929 90.0 81 1.6 465

 Professional degree....................... 1,601 1,503 93.9 1,485 92.8 18 1.2 98

 Doctoral degree.............................. 1,252 1,162 92.8 1,148 91.7 15 1.3 90

 1

 Includes persons with a high school diploma or equivalent.

 SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Educational attainment and sex

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

Not 

in 

labor 

force 

 Total 

Percent 

of 

population 

21
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1840** 

JENNIFER M. MCGOWAN , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES, NORTHEAST, INC.; URSULA BASKETT , Defendants

– Appellees , and
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES

- NORTH CENTRAL, INC.; ABM J ANITORIAL SERVICES

- MID

- ATLANTIC, INC. , Defendants
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cv - 00388

- MSD

- DEM )

Submitted : January 31, 2012 Decided: February 6, 2012

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jennifer M. McGowan, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Ward, MORRIS & MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: In this personal injury action, removed to federal court under the court’s diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2006), Jennifer M. McGo wan appeals the district court's order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Having reviewed the district court’s ruling de novo, Taylor v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. , 658 F.3d 402, 408 (4th Cir. 2011), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGowan v. ABM Janitorial Servs. , No. 2:10

- cv - 00 3 88

- MSD

- DEM (E.D. Va. filed June 29 & entered June 30, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequ ately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                CEO CERTIFICATION




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Global Innovative Systems,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the period ending  September  30, 2002, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Fraser  Lawrie,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Fraser Lawrie
Fraser Lawrie, President and CEO
March 7 , 2003


                                       47
#### Wai Kun Lee, Respondent, v Otsego Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Appellant.

[854 NYS2d 211]

*864The plaintiff owns a two-family residence (hereinafter the premises) in Brooklyn. After a two-week vacation in January 2005 the plaintiff returned to find that his tenant, who had been notified that eviction proceedings were going to be commenced against him, and with whom the plaintiff had an acrimonious and contentious relationship, had moved out. The thermostat in the premises had also been turned down to its lowest setting, essentially shutting off the heat, causing a pipe in the attic to burst, and resulting in extensive water damage to the premises.

The plaintiff filed a claim under a casualty insurance policy issued by the defendant, Otsego Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (hereinafter Otsego). Otsego denied the claim on the ground that the policy did not cover loss due to a frozen pipe or the accidental discharge of water. The plaintiff then commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that his loss was the result of vandalism, a peril covered under the policy and that, therefore, Otsego had breached the contract of insurance by denying the claim. Otsego moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in its entirety. The Supreme Court denied that branch of Otsego’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action seeking to recover damages for breach of contract. Otsego appeals and we affirm insofar as appealed from.

To prevail on its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, Otsego was required to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the *865plaintiff’s loss was not the result of vandalism, one of the insured perils. When construing an insurance contract, “the tests to be applied are ‘common speech’ and ‘the reasonable expectation and purpose of the ordinary businessman’ ” *(MDW Enters. v CNA Ins. Co.,*4 AD3d 338, 340 [2004], quoting *Ace Wire & Cable Co. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*60 NY2d 390, 398 [1983]). The common meaning of the term “vandalism” is the “malicious or ignorant destruction of public or private property” (Webster’s New World Dictionary [2d ed 1978]). Otsego’s submissions do not establish that the plaintiffs loss resulted from a cause other than vandalism. Moreover, even if the term “vandalism” were “susceptible of two reasonable interpretations” *(State of New York v Home Indem. Co.,*66 NY2d 669, 671 [1985]), and therefore was ambiguous, it must be construed in favor of the insured *(see Gaetan v Firemen’s Ins. Co. of Newark,*264 AD2d 806, 808 [1999]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of Otsego’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Carni, JJ., concur.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                         |   |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: April 9, 2010  | By:    | /s/ George Ring                         |   |
|                      |   | George Ring                                  |   |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal |   |
|                      |   | Financial Officer                            |   |

----
Exhibit 32.1








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William H. Armstrong III, as Chairman of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  July 15, 2009








/s/ William H. Armstrong III


William H. Armstrong III


Chairman of the Board,


President & Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.