alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of PetroChina Company Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Chen Geng, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 11, 2007

                                    /s/ Chen Geng
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Chen Geng
                                    Title: Chairman of Board of Directors
                                           (performing the functions of Chief
                                           Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF DYERSBURG CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 4, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                             262
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,675)
<INVENTORY>                                     57,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,049
<PP&E>                                         214,427
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (76,758)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 387,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,704
<BONDS>                                        220,822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   387,847
<SALES>                                        315,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,422
<CGS>                                          259,514
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  259,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,746
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,211
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,862
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,349
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,349
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
<FN>
<F1>*AMOUNTS ARE REPORTED NET OF RESERVES IN THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE
SHEET
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
TABLE 5: Layoffs and discharges estimated rate and level changes between December 2010 and January 2011,

         and test of significance, seasonally adjusted



                                                               Rates                          Levels (in thousands)

                                                               =====                          =====================



                                                Estimated      Minimum   Pass test of   Estimated      Minimum   Pass test of

                                              over-the-month significant significance over-the-month significant significance

     Industry                                    change        change*                  change         change*



Total (1)                                         -0.1           0.2                     -158            205            



  Total private                                   -0.1           0.2                     -118            202            

  Government                                      -0.2           0.1         YES          -40             25         YES



  (1) Detail will not necessarily add to totals because of the independent seasonal adjustment of the various series.



  SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, March 11, 2011.

  *NOTE:  Significant over-the-month changes are calculated at a 90 percent confidence level.  The median standard error

is used in testing the over-the-month change.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THERMOENERGY CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000884504
<NAME> THERMOENERGY CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          30,666
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,666
<PP&E>                                          19,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,686)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 330,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,896,674
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,486,797
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   330,522
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                167,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   167,066
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 4-2. Selected labor force characteristics of Hispanics 

or Latinos

0 20 40 60 80 100

Percent

In 2006, Hispanics or Latinos comprised:

22 percent of those

working part time for

economic reasons

15 percent of the

unemployed

14 percent of the

labor force

12 percent of the

long-term unemployed

13 percent of 

marginally attached

workers

Chart 4-2. Selected labor force characteristics of Hispanics 

or Latinos

• Hispanics made up 14 percent of the labor force in 2006. 

• However, they accounted for 22 percent of persons employed part time for 

economic reasons and 15 percent of the unemployed.

• Persons whose ethnicity is identified as Hispanic or Latino may be of any race.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics bls.gov @BLS_gov

UNEMPLOYMENT RATE &

EARNINGS BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

$2,083

$1,661

$1,432

$1,005

$935

$853

5.5 $682

4.0

3.5

2.7

2.2

1.9

1.0%

2022-2032

ANNUAL PAY

+804,600

+45,200

+52,500

+22,500

+59,900

+49,200

+2,100

+6,100

+300

$30,180

$45,380

$29,530

$65,790

$59,830

$60,240

$103,910

$40,170

$88,260

SOME OCCUPATIONS WITH PROJECTED JOB GROWTH 

THAT YOU CAN GET WITH A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA

Exercise trainers and group 

fitness instructors

Police and sheriff's patrol officers

Home health and personal care aides

Animal caretakers

Industrial machinery mechanics

Electricians

Commercial pilots

Photographers

Subway and streetcar operators

OCCUPATIONS

1.4 $2,080

Less than a high school diploma

High school diploma

Some college, no degree

Associate's degree

Bachelor's degree

Master's degree

Professional degree

Doctoral degree

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections program.
#### Michael DOKTOREZTK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S. MORALES, Correctional Officer, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-55657.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

Filed Jan. 3, 2013.

Michael Doktoreztk, San Diego, CA, pro se.

Susan Eileen Coleman, Esquire, Senior Litigation, Mitchell Aaron Wrosch, Burke Williams & Sorensen, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendani>-Appellee.

*700Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Michael Dokto-reztk appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his safety in connection with an assault by other inmates. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. Thompson,*363 F.3d 1013, 1019 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Doktoreztk failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Morales knew of and disregarded an excessive risk to his safety. *See Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (claim of deliberate indifference requires showing that “the officer [knew] of and disregarded] an excessive risk to inmate ... safety”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to consider a declaration by another inmate because the inmate lacked personal knowledge of the events at issue. *See Block v. City of Los Angeles,*253 F.3d 410, 416, 419 (9th Cir.2001) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion and explaining that a court may consider declarations for purposes of summary judgment only if they are made on personal knowl-

edge and sets out facts that would be admissible in evidence).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of SPEAR & JACKSON,
INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending September 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dennis Crowley, principal executive officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                               /s/ Dennis Crowley
                                               ---------------------------------
                                             Name: Dennis Crowley
                                            Title: Principal Executive Officer
                                            Dated: January 13, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-11286 Conference Calendar

LARRY K. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN GILBERT, Regional Director; NO FIRST NAME JAMES, JR., Food Service Manager; E. BOND, Warden; D. BRYANT, Licensed Vocational Nurse; BILLY WILLIAMS, Correctional Officer III; C. DAVIS, Correctional Officer III; B. WEDEKING, Correctional Officer III; T. DRIVER, Sergeant; D. LEA, Correctional Officer III; H. TALIB, Chaplin; S. SCOTT, Correctional Officer III, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:99-CV-261

-------------------- June 14, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larry K. Johnson, Texas state prisoner # 577737, appeals the magistrate judge’s dismissal as frivolous of his civil rights complaint. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) & 1915A(b)(1). Johnson argues that the magistrate judge abused her discretion in dismissing as frivolous his claims that the defendants violated his constitutional right to the free exercise of religion by notNo. 00-11286 -2- providing him with a pork-free diet. He also contends that the magistrate judge abused her discretion in dismissing as frivolous his claim that defendants Williams and Bryant retaliated against him by denying him medication on one occasion. Johnson’s claims that he was served meals containing pork before and after being placed on the “pork-free” list are mere negligence claims, which do not rise to the level of a constitutional violation. George v. King , 837 F.2d 705, 707 (5th Cir. 1988); Eason v. Thaler , 73 F.3d 1322, 1328 n.2 (5th Cir. 1996). Johnson offers nothing more than his conclusional assertions that he was denied medication on one occasion in retaliation against him because he filed a prior grievance against Williams. An inmate’s personal belief that he is a victim of retaliation is not sufficient to support a claim. Jones v. Greninger , 188 F.3d 322, 325 (5th Cir. 1999)

. Johnson’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal and the dismissal as frivolous by the magistrate judge each count as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Johnson, therefore, has two "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Johnson that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated orNo. 00-11286 -3- detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
#### Leonard S. Franco, Respondent, v Joseph Piccilo, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 789]

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying plaintiffs motion in part, providing that plaintiff is granted partial summary judgment on liability only on the second cause of action and vacating the last decretal paragraph and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking a permanent injunction enjoining defendant from parking motor vehicles on plaintiffs driveway and seeking damages resulting from defendant’s alleged trespass. Plaintiff moved by order to show cause for a preliminary injunction, and defendant made a pre-answer motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1). Supreme Court denied defendant’s motion, and the court sua sponte converted plaintiffs motion to one for summary judgment *(see*CPLR 3211 [c]) and granted plaintiff a permanent injunction as well as money damages. We conclude that the court properly denied defendant’s motion inasmuch as the documentary evidence submitted in support thereof did not “conclusively establish[ ] a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law” *(Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). We further conclude that the court properly granted judgment to plaintiff on the issue of liability and granted plaintiff a permanent injunction. “The right of *1183egress and ingress does not confer upon dominant tenants the right to park vehicles along the right of way” *(Marra v Simidian,*79 AD2d 1046, 1047 [1981]; *see Ernst v Keniry,*19 AD2d 938, 939 [1963], *affd*14 NY2d 668 [1964]). We agree with defendant, however, that the court erred in awarding plaintiff money damages. Plaintiffs entitlement to compensatory damages is based on “the reasonable value of the use of the property” *(Granchelli v Johnson Bldg. Co.,*85 AD2d 891 [1982]), and plaintiff submitted no evidence that the reasonable rental value of the driveway was $500 per month, the amount demanded by plaintiff from defendant as set forth in the complaint. We therefore modify the judgment by denying the motion in part, providing that plaintiff is granted partial summary judgment on liability only on the second cause of action and vacating the last decretal paragraph, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court for an “immediate trial” on the issue of damages (CPLR 3212 [c]; *see generally Riluc Co. v Reliance Ins. Co. of N.Y.*[appeal No. 2], 181 AD2d 1048 [1992]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Peradotto, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
Sept. 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,325
<SECURITIES>                                     2,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                      527
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,241
<PP&E>                                           1,125
<DEPRECIATION>                                     672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              977
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           160
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,829
<SALES>                                            544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   672
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,128)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,128)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
ASSIGNMENT AND
ASSUMPTION OF RIGHTS UNDER

SHOPPING CENTER PURCHASE AGREEMENT


For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, PHILLIPS EDISON GROUP LLC, an
Ohio limited liability company (“Assignor”), hereby assigns, transfers and sets
over to FAIRLAWN STATION LLC (“Assignee”), all of Assignor’s right,
title, and interest as Purchaser in and to that certain Shopping Center
Purchase Agreement dated December 13, 2012, as same may have been or may be
amended, including any addendum thereto (“Agreement”) with AG/WP Fairlawn
Owner, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“Seller”), as Seller, with
respect to the land and improvements thereon located in Fairlawn, Summit
County, Ohio, more particularly described in the Agreement, including, but not
limited to, its right, title and interest in and to the Deposit (as defined in
the Agreement).  


	
  Dated:  January 30, 2013

  	
  PHILLIPS EDISON GROUP, LLC,

  an Ohio limited liability company

   

  
	
   

  	
  By:     PHILLIPS EDISON LIMITED 

  PARTNERSHIP,

             a Delaware limited partnership,

             Managing Member

   

  
	
   

  	
  By:     PHILLIPS EDISON & COMPANY, INC., 

             a Maryland corporation, General Partner

   

   

  
	
   

  	
  By:     /s/ Robert F. Myers_______________________

            Robert F. Myers, Chief Operating Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  




 


The undersigned, Assignee, hereby accepts the
foregoing assignment and hereby assumes and agrees to perform all of Assignor’s
obligations under the Agreement and hereby releases, indemnifies and holds
Assignor harmless from any loss, cost, liability or expense which may be
suffered by Assignor in connection with such Agreement, except for any such
loss, cost, liability or expense resulting from the acts of Assignor in
connection with the Agreement taken prior to the date of this Assignment
without the applicable authorization or consent of the undersigned.


	
  Dated:  January 30, 2013

  	
  FAIRLAWN STATION LLC, 

  A Delaware limited liability company 

   

   

   

  
	
   

  	
  By:         /s/ Richard J. Smith_____________________  

               Richard J. Smith, Vice President 

  




 











1
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 8 -00 066 -CR Jua n Or oz c o , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C1C R96 45 4-713 HO NORAB LE NANCY WRI GHT H OH ENGARTEN , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO PI N I O N We gr ant appe llant J uan Or ozco’s motion to di smiss hi s ap p eal. SeeTex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). The appea l is dism issed.

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief Justice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: April 23, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh