alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLICACCOUNTANTS

ON INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE

 

 

Shareholders and Board of Trustees

Saturna Investment Trust

Bellingham, Washington

 

In planning and performing our audit of the financialstatements of the Idaho Tax Exempt Fund, a series of shares of SaturnaInvestment Trust, for the year ended November 30, 2001, we considered itsinternal control structure, including procedures for safeguarding securities, inorder to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing ouropinion on the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of FormN-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control structure.

ThemanagementoftheFundisresponsibleforestablishingandmaintaininganinternalcontrolstructure. In fulfilling this responsibility,estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expectedbenefits and related costs of internal control structure policies andprocedures.   Two of the objectives of an internal control structure are toprovide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets aresafeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and thattransactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization andrecorded properly to permit preparation of financial statements in conformitywith accounting principals generally accepted in the United States ofAmerica.
Because of inherent limitations in any internal controlstructure, errors or irregularities may occur and not be detected.   Also,projection of any evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject tothe risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or thatthe effectiveness of the design and operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control structure would notnecessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might bematerial weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute ofCertified Public Accountants.   A material weakness is a condition in which thedesign or operation of the specific internal control structure elements does notreduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities inamounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements beingaudited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in thenormal course of performing their assigned functions.   However, we noted nomatters involving the internal control structure, including procedures forsafeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses, as definedabove, as of November 30, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use ofmanagement and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not intended to beand should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.

 

 

 
**TAIT, WELLER & BAKER****Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

December 13, 2001**
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Avi Stern, as Chief Financial Officer of Alvarion Ltd. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)  The accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission  (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 15, 2013




/s/ Avi Stern

Avi Stern

Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**THRIVENT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT [letterhead]**
[No. 54841-7-I.

Division One.

December 19, 2005.]

#### Fidelity Mortgage Corporation, *Appellant,*v. Seattle Times Company et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-2-34755-0, Charles W. Mertel, J., entered April 23, July 30, and August 23, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J., concurred in by Becker and Ellington, JJ. Now published at 131 Wn. App. 462.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41109 Conference Calendar

OSCAR MARTINEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus EARNEST V. CHANDLER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CV-541

- - - - - - - - - - December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Oscar Martinez, federal prisoner # 43662-080, was convicted of aiding and abetting the distribution of in excess of 100 kilograms of marihuana. He appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, arguing that he qualifies for relief under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He asserts that his sentence is invalid under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2002), and argues for the first timeNo. 00-41109 -2- on appeal that his inability to proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 violates the Suspension Clause. This court has recently held that Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review and that an Apprendi claim does not satisfy the requirements for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition under the savings clause. See Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary, Beaumont, TX , 305 F.3d 343, 347-48 (5th Cir. 2002). Martinez’s Suspension Clause argument was not raised below and is without merit. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999); Turner v. Johnson , 177 F.3d 390, 392 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the district court's dismissal of Martinez’s petition is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,076,977
<SECURITIES>                                 3,342,971
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,042,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    541,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,317,957
<PP&E>                                       2,824,563
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,230,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,350,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           707
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,695,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,230,280
<SALES>                                      1,662,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,496,685
<CGS>                                        1,363,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,243,140)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Tony L. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PADULA; Ms. Bell; Keith McBride; L. Greerde, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-7376.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.

Tony L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, McDonald, Patrick, Tinsley, Baggett & Poston, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony L. Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying Appellees’ motion for summary judgment without prejudice and with leave to refile. Appellees move to dismiss on the ground that Moore has appealed an interlocutory order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Moore seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 16, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30621

Summary Calendar

GABRIEL JENNINGS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

FREDDICK MENIFEE,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

No. 1:05-CV-1483

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gabriel Jennings, a federal prisoner, appeals the dismissal of

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition wherein he challenges his conviction

under the federal arson statute, 18 U.S.C. § 844(i). The district

court dismissed the petition as an abuse of the writ because Jennings had raised the same claim in an earlier § 2241 petition. We

review de novo the dismissal of a § 2241 petition on the pleadings.

Pack v. Yusuff, 218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir. 2000).
No. 06-30621

-2-

Jennings challenges his arson conviction under Jones v. United

States, 529 U.S. 848 (2000). He argues that the issue in his current petition is whether he was convicted of a nonexistent offense

under Jones. He posits that he did not raise this same issue in

his prior petition, where, he asserts, he claimed that the district

court improperly instructed the jury. 

Based on our review of the record and Jennings’s pleadings in

his prior petition, both in the district court and on appeal, we

conclude that Jennings raised the same challenge to his conviction

based on the holding in Jones and the alleged lack of an interstate

commerce element to his offense. The district court did not err by

holding that Jennings’s instant petition fails to raise a new issue

and is an abuse of the writ. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a); United

States v. Tubwell, 37 F.3d 175, 177-78 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
# 18QRTL5_00

# image1.png
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, JiangJiemin, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of PetroChina Company Limited (the“Company”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theCompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 26, 2012
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | By: | Stratus Block 21 Investments, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, Manager |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By: | Status Block 21 Investments GP, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company, General Partner |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By: |    /s/ Erin D. Pickens                                          |   |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | Erin D. Pickens, Senior Vice President |
|--------|----------------------------------------|

----

----

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

I, Henry Fahman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of JEANTEX GROUP, INC.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the year covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the years presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the year in which this report is being prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the year covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors;

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: April 12, 2010

 

 /s/ Henry Fahman         

Henry Fahman

Interim Chief Executive/Financial Officer

 

----
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Tzvika Friedman, as Chief Executive Officer of Alvarion Ltd. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)
          The accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December
          31, 2008 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 18, 2009

| | /s/ Tzvika Friedman Tzvika
Friedman Chief Executive
Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John E. Baker, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  November
14, 2003





/s/ John E. Baker

John E. Baker

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD  ENEDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000884888
<NAME>                        SunPharm Corporation 
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996          
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996              
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1996            
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1.000
<CASH>                            1,435,544               
<SECURITIES>                              0      
<RECEIVABLES>                             0        
<ALLOWANCES>                              0         
<INVENTORY>                               0         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,484,531             
<PP&E>                                    0     
<DEPRECIATION>                            0     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,484,531             
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               949,101           
<BONDS>                                   0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0     
<PREFERRED>                               0    
<COMMON>                                334       
<OTHER-SE>                          535,096           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,484,531               
<SALES>                                   0     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    547,385          
<CGS>                                     0   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     2,386,337           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,838,952)             
<INCOME-TAX>                              0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0    
<DISCONTINUED>                            0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0     
<CHANGES>                                 0     
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,838,952)            
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.61)      
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.61)         
        


</TABLE>