alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
31.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
 I, Noel
M. Littlefield, certify that:
 
 1.      I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Raybor Management,
Inc.;
 
 2.      Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.      Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.      The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)    designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)    evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)    disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.      The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)    all
significant deficiencies and financial weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data; and
 
 b)    any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
  ****Date: March 30,
2005
    By:
    /s/ Noel M.
    LittlefieldNoel M. LittlefieldChief Financial
  Officer
**Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP**One Indiana Square, Suite 3500  Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

 March 30, 2010

Saturna Investment Trust  c/o Saturna Capital  1300 North State Street  Bellingham, Washington 98225-4730

Re: Amendment to Form N-1A

Gentlemen:

 In accordance with the registration of an indefinite number of units ("Units") registered by Saturna Investment Trust (the "Trust") for its Funds, we have been asked to provide the opinion of our counsel required to be filed as an exhibit to the Trust's registration statement on Form N-1A (the "Registration Statement"). In rendering this opinion, we have examined such documents, records and questions of law as we deemed it necessary to examine for the purpose of this opinion. Based on that examination and investigation, it is our opinion that the Units will be, upon issuance, validly issued, fully paid and not liable to further assessments.

 We have reviewed Post Effective No. 34, and determined that it does not contain disclosures that would render it ineligible to become effective under Rule 485(b) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.

We consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to Post Effective Amendment No. 34 to the Registration Statement.

 Sincerely,

TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP*/s/Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

SUSAN SABOL, VALERIE DONE, and CIVIL ACTION NO.

KATHLEEN KLODNER, on behalf of 2:1 1-cv-04586-SRC-MAS

Lhemselves aad all others similarly

ituated, STIPULATION TO FILE SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs,

-against

EIYDROXATONE, LLC and

ATLANTIC

COAST MEDIA GROUP

Defendants.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED upon by and

between Kelley Drye and Warren LLP, attorneys for defendants

Hydroxatone LLC and Atlantic Coast Media Group (collectively

“Defendants’), and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PPLC, attorneys for

plaintiffs, Suan Sabol, Valerie Done and Kathleen Kiodner (collectively

“Plaintiffs”), that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), Defendants consent

to Plaintiffs filing the Second Amended Complaint, attached hereto as

Exhibit A, on February 7, 2013.

1336553.221336553,3
Dated: February 7, 2013 Dated: February 7, 2013

so ORDERED

s/Kevin McNulty

Kevin McNulty, U.S.D.J.

Date: /3

1336553.22

1336553.3
# SNR03
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Danette M. Moore, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[854 NYS2d 252]

Claimant, a computer technology teacher, was discharged from her employment after she acted in a rude and unprofessional manner during the course of a meeting with her mentor and a student’s parents. Approximately one month before this incident, claimant received a written warning from the employer regarding similar behavior displayed at a school open house. That notice expressly advised claimant that further conduct of the same or a related nature could lead to her discharge.

“An employee’s unprofessional and discourteous conduct, which is detrimental to the interest of an employer, has been held to constitute disqualifying misconduct” *(Matter of Childs [Kaleida Health—Commissioner of Labor],*42 AD3d 620, 621 [2007] [citations omitted]; *see Matter of Cameron [Commissioner of Labor],*15 AD3d 722 [2005]). Here, the credible evidence *1125establishes that claimant arrived late for a scheduled meeting with her mentor and a student’s parents, refused to sit at a table with those individuals, refused to respond to the parents’ questions regarding her teaching credentials and prior experience and generally displayed a discourteous and unprofessional demeanor. Such evidence is more than sufficient to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s ruling that claimant’s behavior constituted disqualifying misconduct. To the extent that claimant denies behaving in an unprofessional manner or contends that she actually resigned her position due to intolerable working conditions—the latter of which is not borne out by the record before us—we need note only that such claims presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve *(see e.g. Matter of Kazaka [Commissioner of Labor],*46 AD3d 1071 [2007]; *Matter of Parker [Commissioner of Labor],*274 AD2d 734 [2000]). Accordingly, the Board’s decision is affirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended January 4, 2009 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in Amendment Number 1 to theCompany’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended January 4, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: May 14, 2009 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5246 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5246

     To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to voter 
                 intimidation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 2004

  Mr. Cummings (for himself, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Towns, Ms. Corrine 
    Brown of Florida, Mr. Meeks of New York, Ms. Lee, Mr. Bishop of 
    Georgia, Mr. Davis of Illinois, and Mr. Fattah) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to voter 
                 intimidation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voter Protection Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. VOTER PROTECTION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 249. Interfering with voting through misrepresentation
    ``Whoever willfully provides misleading or fraudulent information 
to an individual and thereby interferes with that individual's voting 
or qualifying to vote, qualifying or campaigning as a candidate for 
elective office, or qualifying or acting as a poll watcher, or any 
legally authorized election official, in any primary, special, or 
general election, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not 
more than one year, or both.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``249. Interfering with voting through misrepresentation.''.
                                 <all>
```
ex10_2.htm








Exhibit 10.2







EXHIBIT “B”







Legal Description:







(THE DESCRIPTION BELOW IS A TRACT OF LAND TO BE KNOWN AS LOT 1 IN A FUTURE REPLAT OF MARIAH CENTER)




A TRACT OF LAND OVER A PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MARIAH CENTER, A SUBDIVISION OF LAND IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 26 SOUTH, RANGE 25 WEST AND SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 26 SOUTH, RANGE 25 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DODGE CITY, FORD COUNTY, KANSAS, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;




COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 26 SOUTH, RANGE 25 WEST;  THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 21, A DISTANCE OF 1050.07 FEET;  THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1984.59 FEET;   TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A TRACT OF LAND TO BE KNOWN AS LOT 1 OF THE FUTURE REPLAT OF MARIAH CENTER;







(THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED COURSES ARE ALONG THE OUT BOUNDARY OF THE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND TO BE KNOWN AS LOT 1 OF THE FUTURE REPLAT OF MARIAH CENTER).







THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 656.15 FEET;  THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1853.43 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 50, AS SAID HIGHWAY NOW EXISTS;  THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1895.58 FEET;  THENCE WESTERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 710.00 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 85 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 815.32 FEET, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 868.46 FEET;  THENCE NORTH 35 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 573.33 FEET;  THENCE NORTH 07 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 143.62 FEET;  THENCE NORTH 54 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 733.78 FEET;  THENCE NORTH 30 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 715.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND TO BE KNOWN AS LOT 1 IN A FUTURE REPLAT OF MARIAH CENTER.







CONTAINS 2,970,572 SQUARE FEET OR 68.19 ACRES MORE OR LESS.   SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND OR COVENANTS RECORDED OR UNRECORDED.
# laucnty10

&8Page &P of &N
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Paul N. ALDRICH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-5290-CR.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2012.

Molly Corbett, Office of the Federal Public Defender, (Lisa A. Peebles, Interim Federal Public Defender, on the brief), Albany, NY, for Appellant.

Brenda K. Sannes, Assistant United States Attorney, (Carlos A. Moreno, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), for Richard Hartunian, United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York, Syracuse, NY, for Appellee.

Present: PIERRE N. LEVAL, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Paul Aldrich appeals the modification of his terms of supervised release by the district court via order on December 13, 2011. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and specification of issues for review.

We review de novo the district court’s determination that it had jurisdiction to modify the terms of Aldrich’s supervised release. Insofar as Aldrich might be understood to challenge jurisdiction by arguing that his supervised release term ran and concluded after he completed his criminal sentence but remained in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) pending a civil commitment determination under 18 U.S.C. § 4248, he raises a question unanswered in this Circuit. In this case, we need not answer this question because, as part of the settlement of his § 4248 proceedings, Aldrich had already stipulated *49that his term of supervised release had not commenced while he remained in BOP custody. Where a defendant has secured the benefits of a knowing and voluntary agreement, the terms of that agreement will generally be enforced. *See, e.g., United States v. Rosa,*123 F.3d 94, 97 (2d Cir.1997) (enforcing an appeal waiver); *see also Tobey v. United States,*470 Fed.Appx. 113, 2012 WL 1073022 (4th Cir.2012) (unpublished) (determining that similar plea agreement mooted appeal of district court finding that supervised release was stayed pending civil commitment proceeding); *United States v. Katon,*03-CR-110, 2011 WL 4744906 (D.Vt. Oct. 6, 2011).

We review the district court’s modifications of Aldrich’s conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion. *United States v. Dupes,*513 F.3d 338, 342-13 (2d Cir.2008). We find that the district court appropriately modified the terms of Ald-rich’s supervised release by considering the factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e).

Aldrich’s argument that his delay in receiving a civil commitment hearing constituted a violation of due process sufficient to vacate his remaining term of supervised release was not raised below. His contention therefore fails unless the claimed error meets the standard of “plain error.” Fed. R.Crim. Pro. 52(b). It does not.

We find Aldrich’s remaining arguments to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court hereby is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 6.1

                       KOWLOON-CANTON RAILWAY CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                     <C>             <C>        <C>          <C>             <C>             <C>
                                                                                               Restated
                                                      1998          1999          2000           2001           2002          2002
                                                   ----------    ---------    ------------   ------------    ----------    ---------
                                                       HK$          HK$            HK$            HK$            HK$          US$
                                                                                  (except share data)
(1) Weighted average number of ordinary shares        124,650      289,950         311,200        377,867       391,200      391,200

    HK GAAP
(2) Profit after taxation (in millions)                 1,639        1,903           2,288          2,435         2,661          341
    Earnings per share - Basic (2)/(1)                 13,149        6,563           7,352          6,444         6,802          872

    US GAAP
(3) Net Income (in millions)                            2,129        3,150           4,113          3,792         2,951          378
    Earnings per share - Basic (3)/(1)                 17,080       10,864          13,217         10,035         7,543          967
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 79 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 79

To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study and submit to 
Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with 
             dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study and submit to 
Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with 
             dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Early Detection of Dyslexia in 
Children Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT BY SECRETARY OF EDUCATION ON IDENTIFICATION 
              AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA IN KINDERGARTEN 
              THROUGH THIRD GRADE.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of Education, in consultation with the 
National Academy of Sciences, shall conduct a study on methods for 
identifying and treating children with dyslexia in kindergarten through 
third grade. In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall consider--
            (1) whether there is a biological basis for dyslexia;
            (2) whether dyslexia is caused by--
                    (A) a brain-based phonological deficit that 
                prevents an individual from breaking down written words 
                into component sounds;
                    (B) post-natal experience, including inadequate 
                instruction; or
                    (C) a combination thereof; and
            (3) the cost of implementing a program on a nationwide 
        basis to identify and treat children with dyslexia in 
        kindergarten through third grade.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education shall prepare and 
submit to Congress a report containing the results of the study 
conducted under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 141 (Friday, July 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36695-36696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP06-9-002]


Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC; Notice of Filing

July 20, 2009.
    Take notice that on July 2, 2009, the Florida Department of 
Transportation (FDOT) made a filing styled as a ``Protest of Florida 
Department of Transportation and Motion for Order Directing Compliance, 
Motion for Order to Show Cause, and Request for Expedited Treatment.'' 
In the filing FDOT alleges that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC 
(FGT) has failed to comply with the Commission's May 3, 2006 and 
October 10, 2008 orders regarding the abandonment of certain facilities 
located in Broward County, Florida.\1\ Specifically, FDOT asserts that 
FGT has failed to completely abandon a segment of its 18-inch diameter 
line between Mileposts 882.61 and 882.95 as authorized by the May 3, 
2006 Order and directed by the October 10, 2008 Order. In addition, 
FDOT requests that the Commission issue an order directing FGT to 
depressurize, hold in reserve and cease using as a mainline facility a 
0.4 mile, 24-inch diameter pipeline segment between Mileposts 882.55 
and 882.95. Finally,

[[Page 36696]]

FDOT requests that the Commission issue an order directing FGT to show 
cause as to why it should not be required to abandon and grout this 
segment of 24-inch diameter pipe between Mileposts 882.55 and 882.95. 
FDOT's filing is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket 
number, excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, call (866) 208-3676 or TTY, (202) 
502-8659.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Florida Gas Transmission Co., 115 FERC ] 61,140 (2006) and 
Florida Gas Transmission Co., 125 FERC ] 61,032 (2008) (May 3, 2006 
Order and October 10, 2008 Order, respectively).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person wishing to become a party to this proceeding should, on 
or before the comment date listed below, file with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a 
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10).
    Motions to intervene, protests and comments may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages 
electronic filings.
    Comment Date: August 31, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17697 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Whittier Energy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for
the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Michael B. Young, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



|      |  |                  |  | /s/MICHAEL B. YOUNG                     
|----- |  | ---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: |  | December 8, 2005 |  | MICHAEL B. YOUNG Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
# 16SNR01_00

# image1.png
# industrial vehicles

forklifts - continued		

forklifts		

forklifts - continued		

forklifts		

Page &P