alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Richard Damron, Jr., President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and  2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date:November 14, 2006 /s/J. Richard Damron, Jr.         J. Richard Damron, JrPresident and Chief Executive Officer    (principal executive officer) and Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0288

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

CLIFFTON WELLS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, and 

good cause shown, Appellant is hereby granted an extension of time until December 30, 

2020, within which to file and serve Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 20 2020

11/20/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0288
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

35. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

(In thousands)

Category

Total Age Sex

2005 2006

16 to 24

years

25 to 54

years

55 years

and over Men Women

2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006

Total not in the labor force .................................... 76,762 77,387 14,383 14,549 21,403 21,318 40,976 41,520 29,119 29,350 47,643 48,037

 Do not want a job now 1 ..................................... 71,777 72,602 12,585 12,867 19,238 19,221 39,954 40,514 26,926 27,248 44,851 45,354

 Want a job 1 ........................................................ 4,985 4,786 1,798 1,682 2,165 2,097 1,022 1,006 2,193 2,102 2,792 2,684

 Did not search for work in previous year .......... 2,841 2,758 963 883 1,163 1,155 715 720 1,173 1,145 1,668 1,612

 Searched for work in previous year 2 ............... 2,144 2,028 836 800 1,002 942 307 286 1,020 956 1,124 1,071

 Not available to work now ............................... 599 580 285 282 260 252 54 46 231 226 368 354

 Available to work now ..................................... 1,545 1,448 551 518 742 690 252 240 789 731 756 717

 Reason not currently looking:

 Discouragement over job prospects 3 ........ 436 381 141 118 217 195 78 68 260 229 176 152

 Reasons other than discouragement .......... 1,109 1,067 410 399 525 495 175 172 529 502 580 565

 Family responsibilities .............................. 159 152 32 31 105 97 22 24 36 35 123 117

 In school or training .................................. 217 207 179 177 35 28 2 2 118 111 99 96

 Ill health or disability ................................. 119 130 16 18 69 76 34 36 64 63 55 68

 Other 4 ...................................................... 614 578 182 174 316 294 116 110 311 292 302 285

1 Includes some persons who are not asked if they want a job. 2 Persons who had a job in the prior 12 months must have searched

since the end of that job. 3 Includes believes no work available, could not find work, lacks

necessary schooling or training, employer thinks too young or old, and

other types of discrimination.

4 Includes those who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks

for such reasons as child care and transportation problems, as well as a

small number for which reason for nonparticipation was not ascertained.

 NOTE: Beginning in January 2006, data reflect revised population

controls used in the household survey.

258
AMANDA JACKSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2762

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed October 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Dawn Caloca

- Johnson , Judge

.

Amanda Jackson, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Justin Chapman, Assistant Attorney

General, Tal lahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
EX-10.17



 Exhibit 10.17 
 Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement 

with Keith A. Wilson 
 This Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 15, 2008, as amended (the “Agreement”) by and between Affinia Group Inc. (the
“Company”) and Keith A. Wilson (“Executive”) is made this 29th day of August 2012. Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings assigned to such terms under the Agreement. 

The Company and Executive have determined that it is in their best interests to amend the Agreement to provide for an automatic extension
of the Employment Term upon the occurrence of a Change of Control. In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the continued employment of Executive by the Company, the parties agree as follows: 

1. Term of Employment. Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add a new proviso at the end of the last sentence of
Section 1 to read as follows: 
 “; provided further that, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined in
the Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan) during the Employment Term, the Employment Term shall be automatically extended until the first December 31 following the 24 month anniversary of the Change of Control date.”

 2. Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms of the Agreement shall be and remain unchanged and the Agreement as amended
hereby shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed. 
  

			
	AFFINIA GROUP INC.
	
	 /s/ Terry R. McCormack

	By:	 	Terry R. McCormack
		 	Chief Executive Officer
	
	 /s/ Keith A. Wilson

	Keith A. Wilson
#### In the Matter of the Claim of William Connell, Appellant, v Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[857 NYS2d 240]

Kane, J.

Claimant sustained a compensable injury to his back, hip and ankle in 2001 that was ultimately found to be a permanent partial disability. In October 2002, claimant returned to work after back' surgery, restricted to light duty with limited lifting. *1056Claimant went out of work again in October 2003 and was cleared to return to light duty one month later. At approximately the same time, however, claimant notified the employer he was retiring, effective February 2004. A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge found that claimant voluntarily retired from the labor market for reasons not related to his disability and denied postretirement workers’ compensation benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed this decision and claimant now appeals.

We affirm. The question of whether a claimant’s retirement was voluntary is a factual determination for the Board which will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence, even if there is evidence supporting a contrary result *(see Matter of Phillips v Plainville Turkey Farms, Inc.,*45 AD3d 1061, 1062 [2007]; *Matter of O’Dell v Consolidated Edison,*34 AD3d 1137, 1138 [2006]). Here, medical testimony indicated that claimant was cleared to work with restrictions at the time of his retirement and evidence was presented that such employment was offered claimant. Claimant also was not advised to retire from light-duty employment and did not apply for a disability pension, but instead retired with a full unreduced pension right after reaching the qualifying age. Although claimant presented evidence to the contrary, the Board’s determination that he voluntarily withdrew from the labor market is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld *(see Matter of West v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.,*29 AD3d 1251, 1252 [2006]; *Matter of Stagnitta v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.,*24 AD3d 1099, 1100-1101 [2005]).

Peters, J.P., Carpinello, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of The Vermont  Witch Hazel Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending July 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Kevin B.
Halter,  Jr., Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Company.




 /s/ Kevin B. Halter, Jr.
-------------------------


THE VERMONT WITCH HAZEL COMPANY

Chief Executive Officer

August 26, 2002















S:\RLB\SarbanesCertification.doc
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Infinite Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James Witzel, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
November 10, 2010





/s/
      James WitzelJames
      WitzelChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)





A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.6 THE WESTAIM CORPORATION Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) In connection with the report of The Westaim Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year
ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), each of the undersigned certifies that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 31, 2005 /s/ Barry M. Heck
    
    /s/ G.A. (Drew) FitchName:
    Barry M. Heck
    
    Name:
    G.A. (Drew) FitchTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
The Westaim Corporation
    
    Title:
    Chief Financial Officer
The Westaim Corporation A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The
Westaim Corporation and will be retained by The Westaim Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# ORIGMAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 22-0501 JOHN WESLEY BUCHANAN,

Petitioner,
v. MONTANA FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, HON. RANDAL I. SPAULDING, Presiding,

Respondent. 

# FILED SEP 0 6 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State or Montana ORDER

Petitioner John Wesley Buchanan, via counsel, seeks a writ of supervisory control directing the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Meagher County, to dismiss its Cause No. DC-21-01 on double jeopardy grounds. Buchanan alleges the District Court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss via its July 7, 2022 Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Information. With this matter set for trial on October 6, 2022, Buchanan further moves for a stay ofproceedings pending resolution ofhis petition for writ. Havingreviewed thePetition and thechallenged Order,this Court deems it appropriate to obtain a summary response. We further agreewith Buchanan that it would be improper to holdtrialwhileresolution ofthepresentpetition ispending. However,wemay havesufficient time to rule upon this petition in advance of trial. We will revisit the issue of stay after obtaining responses. Therefore, in accordance with M. R. App. P. 14(7), IT IS ORDERED that theFourteenth Judicial District Court, and the State ofMontana, or both, are granted 10 days from the date ofthis Ordertoprepare, file, and serve aresponse(s) to the petition for writ ofsupervisory control in Cause No. DC-21-01. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Buchanan's motion for stay is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. This matter may proceed in the District Court until further order of this Court. 09/06/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0501

### The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to counsel for

Petitioner, all counsel of record in the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Meagher County, Cause No. DC-21-01, and the Honorable Randal I. Spaulding, presiding. DATED this tio ay ofSeptember, 2022.

ChiefJustice



# (cgtr— 

# LA•e/iti

2
<Page>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                                CareScience, Inc.
                               3600 Market Street
                             Philadelphia, PA 19104


March 22, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release Nos. 33-8070,
34-45590, 35-27503, 39-2395, IA-2018, IC-25464, FR-62, File No. S7-03-02,
this letter is to confirm that CareScience, Inc. has received assurance from
its independent public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP ("Arthur Andersen"),
that Arthur Andersen's audit of our consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended (the "Audit") was subject to
Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity
of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the Audit and availability of
national office consultation. Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates
of Arthur Andersen is not relevant to this audit.

                                                     CARESCIENCE, INC.

                                                     /s/ Steven Bell
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.3








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-150101 and 333-161218 on Form S-3ASR and Registration Statement Nos. 333-76288, 333-139108, 333-129454, 333-03303, 333-03289, 333-88372, 333-121371, 333-125010, 333-141282, 333-156243, 333-159361, and 333-159362 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 16, 2010  related to the consolidated financial statements of Optim Energy, LLC and subsidiaries, appearing in this Amendment No. 1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PNM Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





Dallas, Texas


March 30, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,305,917
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 22,027,605
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      22,024,486
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        22,989,000
<LOANS>                                    237,879,932
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,248,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             294,509,964
<DEPOSITS>                                 206,735,937
<SHORT-TERM>                                38,500,852
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,221,245
<LONG-TERM>                                 15,669,563
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,336,295
<OTHER-SE>                                 21,0446,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             294,509,964
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              9,492,899
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,458,341
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,951,240
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,268,870
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,446,437
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,504,803
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  156,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (7,072)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,497,731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,365,905
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,365,905
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,675,577
<EPS-BASIC>                                      30.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    30.48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.94
<LOANS-NON>                                  7,061,224
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             12,828,392
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,058,618
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,954
<RECOVERIES>                                    39,330
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,248,994
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      3,248,994


</TABLE>
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 104

Electing Members and Delegates to certain standing committees of the House 

of Representatives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2003

Mr. MENENDEZ submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Electing Members and Delegates to certain standing 

committees of the House of Representatives.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members and 

2 Delegates be and are hereby elected to the following stand3 ing committees of the House of Representatives: 

4 (1) COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Lucas 

5 of Kentucky (to rank immediately after Mr. Bos6 well). 

7 (2) COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Kind. 

8 (3) COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: 

9 Ms. Norton (to rank immediately after Mr. 

10 Ruppersberger). 
2

•HRES 104 ATH 

1 (4) COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mrs. 

2 Christensen (to rank immediately after Mr. Ryan of 

3 Ohio), Mr. Davis of Illinois (to rank immediately 

4 after Mrs. Christensen), Mr. Gonzalez (to rank im5 mediately after Mr. Davis of Illinois), Ms. Majette 

6 (to rank immediately after Ms. Bordallo).

Æ
SECOND AMENDMENT


to


CONSULTING AGREEMENT


 


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (the “Second
Amendment”), dated February 14, 2013 (the “Effective Date”) is by and between Loton Corp., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”) and Andrew Schleimer (“Consultant”), shall modify and amend and shall constitute a
part of that certain Consulting Agreement (“Agreement”) dated November 1, 2012, as amended by that certain first amendment
dated January 14, 2013, by and between Company and Consultant.


 


WHEREAS, Company and Consultant wish
to amend certain sections of the Agreement,


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration
of the promises and mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.Defined Terms. All capitalized terms, unless
otherwise indicated or defined, shall have the meanings attributed to them in the Agreement.


 


2.Events of Conflict. In the event of any conflict
between the terms of the Agreement, as amended and the terms of this Second Amendment, the terms of this Second Amendment shall
control.


 


3.Section 5.3 of the Agreement. Section 5.3 of
the Agreement, as amended is hereby amended to delete the 1st sentence of Section 5.3 in its entirety and replace it with the following
sentence:


 


“The Company
grants Consultant the option to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price to be determined by the Board based
upon the fair value of the Company as of the date of hereof. Consultant hereby agrees to enter into the Company’s standard
option agreement with the Company, which such agreement shall set forth other terms and conditions related to the options granted
hereunder.”


 


4.Effect of Agreement. Except as where amended
by this Second Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, This Second Amendment
to the Agreement has been executed by Company and Consultant, as of the Effective Date:


 





	LOTON CORP.  (“Company”)	 	CONSULTANT
	 	 	 
	By: _____________________	 	By: _________________________
	 	 	 
	Name: ___________________	 	Name: _______________________