alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 106

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 4, 2003.

Whereas the Nation’s Lutheran schools deliver high-quality

education and challenge students to reach their potential;

Whereas there are 4,841 Lutheran early childhood centers,

elementary schools, and secondary schools in the United

States served by 40,076 teachers;

Whereas the Nation’s total Lutheran school student enrollment is 572,877;

Whereas Lutheran schools produce students strongly dedicated to their faith, values, and morals by providing an

environment that encourages honesty, trust, respect, and

responsibility; and

Whereas the week beginning on March 2, 2003, has been established as National Lutheran Schools Week for the

purpose of recognizing the vital contributions of the Nation’s Lutheran early childhood education centers, elementary schools, and secondary schools: Now, therefore,

be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) supports the goals of National Lutheran Schools

Week, which is celebrated by several synods that have
2

•HRES 106 EH

educational institutions, for the purpose of recognizing

their academic achievement; and

(2) congratulates Lutheran schools, students, parents, teachers, administrators, and congregations across

the Nation for their ongoing contributions to education.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                                 March 29, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0408


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         This letter is written pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of
Regulation S-X.

         Exult, Inc. has received a representation letter from Arthur Andersen
LLP ("Andersen") stating that the audit of the consolidated financial statements
of Exult, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and the year then ended
was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
auditing practices to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate
continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of national
office consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of
Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

                                                       Sincerely,

                                                       /s/ MICHAEL F. HENN
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Michael F. Henn
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       Exult, Inc.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 824

To authorize the National Science Foundation to carry out research projects 

to develop and assess novel uses of high-performance computer networks 

for use in science, mathematics, and technology education in elementary 

and secondary schools. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. LARSON of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Science 

A BILL

To authorize the National Science Foundation to carry out 

research projects to develop and assess novel uses of 

high-performance computer networks for use in science, 

mathematics, and technology education in elementary 

and secondary schools.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Research on High5 Performance Networking for Science Education Act’’. 
2

•HR 824 IH 

1 SEC. 2. NETWORKING RESEARCH PROJECTS. 

2 (a) PROJECTS AUTHORIZED.—As part of the Net3 working and Information Technology Research and Devel4 opment Program authorized under section 101(a) of the 

5 High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (15 U.S.C. 

6 5511(a)), the National Science Foundation, in cooperation 

7 with other agencies participating in that Program, is au8 thorized to carry out research projects to develop novel 

9 uses and to evaluate the effectiveness of high-performance 

10 computer networks in science, mathematics, and tech11 nology education in elementary and secondary schools. 

12 (b) ASSESSMENTS.—The National Science Founda13 tion shall identify metrics to assess the educational effec14 tiveness of the projects under subsection (a), put in place 

15 procedures to make such an assessment for each project 

16 supported, and document and disseminate the findings of 

17 the assessments. Descriptions of the projects and the find18 ings of the assessments of projects shall be included in 

19 the report required under section 101(a)(3)(A) of the 

20 High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (15 U.S.C. 

21 5511(a)(3)(A)). 

22 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

23 There are authorized to be appropriated for the pur24 poses of this Act $10,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 

25 2004, 2005, and 2006.

Æ
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-667

_____________________________

JAYMOND FOSTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

W. Joel Boles, Judge.

September 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jaymond Foster, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Washington Group, LLC, et al., Appellants, v Adam Dewalt Adams, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 905]

The Supreme Court properly, in effect, denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for an award of an attorney’s fee *(see Adams v Washington Group, LLC,*49 AD3d 786 [2008] [decided herewith]). Mastro, J.P., Florio, Miller and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | ASSIGNOR: CORUS BANK, N.A., a national banking association  By:  /s/ Brian J. BrodeurName:       Brian J. BrodeurTitle:       SeniorVice President   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|   | ASSIGNEE:  STRATUS PARTNERSHIP INVESTMENTS, L.P.,a Texas limited partnership By:Stratus Partnership Investments GP, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company, General Partner By:Stratus Properties Operating Co., L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Manager By:STRS L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, General Partner By:Stratus Properties Inc., a Delaware corporation, Sole MemberBy:/s/ Kenneth N. JonesKenneth N. JonesSecretary  |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
THERATECH, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      12,158,498
<SECURITIES>                                 8,914,846
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,257,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,775,362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,311,890
<PP&E>                                      25,333,159
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,174,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,536,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,505,626
<BONDS>                                      9,039,043
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       203,645
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,575,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,536,014
<SALES>                                      7,144,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,760,666
<CGS>                                        5,740,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,692,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,059
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             815,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,219,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,219,157
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,219,157
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted July 12, 2019

Decided July 12, 2019

Before

DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Nos. 17-1300 & 17-1325

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 399, et al
., Plaintiff-Appellees
, CrossA ppellants,

v

.
VILLAGE OF LINCOLNSHIRE, et al.
,Defendants-Appellants, CrossA ppellees

. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:16-cv-02395

Matthew F. Kennelly, J udge

.

O R D E R

The Supreme Court has granted the Village of Lincolnshire’s writ of certiorari seeking review of our decision in this ca se, 905 F.3d 995 (7th Cir. 2018), and has vacated our judgment. See Village of Lincolnshire v. Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs Local 399, No. 18-1070, 2019 WL 653081 (mem.) (U.S. June 10, 2019). Pursuant to the Court’s order, we NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited onl y in accordance with Fed. R. A pp . P. 32.1Nos. 17-1300 & 17-1325 Page 2

now remand this case to the District Court wi th instructions to dismiss the case as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. , 340 U.S. 36 (1950).

IT IS SO ORDERED.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 815

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study 

with respect to aneurysms, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. KING of New York (for himself and Mr. GUTIERREZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

to conduct a study with respect to aneurysms, and for 

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aneurysm Awareness 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HHS STUDY ON ANEURYSMS. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Health and Human 

8 Services shall conduct a study on the following matters 

9 with respect to occurrence of aneurysms in the population 

10 of the United States: 
2

•HR 815 IH 

1 (1) The incidence of aneurysms. 

2 (2) The most common signs and symptoms of 

3 aneurysms. 

4 (3) Characteristics of individuals at the highest 

5 risk for aneurysms. 

6 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

8 to Congress a report on the study conducted under sub9 section (a). 

10 SEC. 3. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS. 

11 It is the sense of the Congress that there should be 

12 an increased awareness of and research pertaining to an13 eurysms.

Æ
# NEM SOC CPS crosswalk

# Definitions

https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsoccind.htmhttps://www.bls.gov/emp/classifications-crosswalks/nem-occupational-coverage.xlsxhttps://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/forms/emp
H. R. 925

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1859

South Ashland Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Cesar Chavez Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1859 South Ashland Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, and known as

the Pilsen Post Office, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Cesar

Chavez Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Cesar Chavez

Post Office’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

The undersigned, Jay Wells, Chief Financial Officer of Cott Corporation (the Company), has executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 4, 2015 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 23rd day of
November, 2015.



/s/ Jay WellsJay WellsChief Financial Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 11194 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MARVIN JAMEL FANTROY , also known as Seven , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12

- CR

- 427

- 10

Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Marvin Jamel Fantroy has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Fantroy h a s not filed a respons e. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 16, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-11194 Document: 00512871074 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/16/2014No. 13

- 11194

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw i s GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-11194 Document: 00512871074 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/16/2014
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-51291

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-99-CV-394-SS (A-98-CR-19-2-SS)

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonio Garcia, federal prisoner # 77584-079, pleaded guilty

to count one of the indictment charging him with conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute cocaine, cocaine base, and

heroin, and count 12 charging him with using a telephone to

facilitate the drug conspiracy, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and 843(b). A certificate of appealability (COA)

was granted on the issue of the voluntariness of Garcia’s plea
No. 00-51291

-2-

agreement. See United States v. Garcia, No. 00-51291 (5th Cir.

May 17, 2001) (single-judge order).

Garcia argues that, based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530

U.S. 466 (2000), his guilty plea was involuntary because the

quantity of drugs was not charged in the indictment, the district

court was thus without jurisdiction, the district court did not

properly inform him of the charges to which he was pleading

guilty, and his counsel was ineffective for allowing him to plead

guilty under those circumstances.

Since the parties filed their briefs, we rejected an

identical jurisdictional argument in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 case in

Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont, Tx., 305 F.3d 343, 346 (5th

Cir. 2002). The petitioner in Wesson also argued that his

indictment was defective under Apprendi because it did not allege

a drug quantity, and that the district court was deprived of

jurisdiction. Citing United States v. Cotton, 122 S. Ct. 1781,

1785-86 (2002), United States v. Longoria, 298 F.3d 367 (5th Cir.

2002 (en banc), and United States v. Gonzalez, 259 F.3d 355 (5th

Cir. 2002) (en banc), we held that the petitioner’s claim that

his defective indictment deprived the court of jurisdiction was

meritless because defects in an indictment are nonjurisdictional. 

Wesson, 305 F.3d at 346.

We also recently held in United States v. Brown, 305 F.3d

304, 310 (5th Cir. 2002), a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 case, that the new

rule of criminal procedure announced in Apprendi does not apply

retroactively on collateral review of initial 28 U.S.C. § 2255
No. 00-51291

-3-

motions. Because Garcia’s claims are all dependent upon the

retroactive application of Apprendi in this 28 U.S.C. § 2255

proceeding, and because it has been determined that Apprendi is

not applicable retroactively on collateral review, the district

court’s denial of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief is AFFIRMED.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 867

AN ACT

For the relief of Durreshahwar Durreshahwar,

Iqra Hasan.Nida Hasan, Asna Hasan, Anum Hasan, and

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 867

AN ACT

For the relief of Durreshahwar Durreshahwar, Nida Hasan,

Asna Hasan, Anum Hasan, and Iqra Hasan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 867 EH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR

2 DURRESHAHWAR DURRESHAHWAR, NIDA

3 HASAN, ASNA HASAN, ANUM HASAN, AND

4 IQRA HASAN.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Durreshahwar Durreshahwar, Nida Hasan, Asna

8 Hasan, Anum Hasan, and Iqra Hasan shall each be eligi9 ble for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment

10 of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for perma11 nent residence upon filing an application for issuance of

12 an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for

13 adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.

14 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Durreshahwar

15 Durreshahwar, Nida Hasan, Asna Hasan, Anum Hasan,

16 or Iqra Hasan enters the United States before the filing

17 deadline specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered

18 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other19 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under

20 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of

21 the date of the enactment of this Act.

22 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

23 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap24 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica25 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

26 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
3

•HR 867 EH

1 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

2 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res3 idence to Durreshahwar Durreshahwar, Nida Hasan,

4 Asna Hasan, Anum Hasan, and Iqra Hasan, the Secretary

5 of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 5,

6 during the current or next following fiscal year, the total

7 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na8 tives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

9 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli10 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made

11 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth

12 under section 202(e) of such Act.

13 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

14 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural

15 parents, brothers, and sisters of Durreshahwar

16 Durreshahwar, Nida Hasan, Asna Hasan, Anum Hasan,

17 and Iqra Hasan shall not, by virtue of such relationship,

18 be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi19 gration and Nationality Act.

Passed the House of Representatives July 6, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7724
TIMOTHY JAY BLACKWELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. M. VANYUR, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-97-256) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Jay Blackwell, Appellant Pro Se. R obert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Blackwell v. Vanyur , No. CA-97-256 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Unemployment rates by county and disaster assista

Florida, September 2005, not seasonally adj

(State rate = 3.8%; U.S. rate = 4.8%)

7.0% or more6.0% to 6.9%5.0% to 5.9%4.0% to 4.9%3.9% or below

Unemployment Rate

Franklin

3.9%

Gulf

4.0%

Bay, 3.5%

Walton

2.5%

Okaloosa

2.8%

Santa

Rosa4.1%

Co

3.

Franklin

3.8%

Gulf

3.8%

Bay, 3.6%

Walton

3.5%

Okaloosa3.2%

Santa

Rosa

3.5% Escambia 3.9%

The labeled counties are eligible fordisaster assistance as of September 6.

NOTE: