alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7019
LEO L. MADDOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID ODOM, Hearing Officer; MARIA BLANDSHAW, I.A.C. Staff Coordinator, in their official and individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-1835-3-18BC) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leo L. Maddox, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Arlen Cotter, Jr., Benjamin Davis McCoy, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, GRIER & HOWSER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maddox v. Odom , No. CA-94-1835-3-18BC (D.S.C. June 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND OFFICERS
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
                   OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Javan Khazali, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Accounting Officer), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-kSB of Giant Jr. Investments
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am the registrant's only certifying officer. I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I am the registrant's only certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I am the registrant's only certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date or our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


/s/ Javan Khazali
------------------
Javan Khazali
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
Table 25. Wives who earn more than their husbands, 1987-2007

(Numbers in thousands)

Married-couple 

families in which 

wife (but not 

necessarily 

husband) had 

earnings from 

work

Wives who earn

more than 

their 

husbands 1

Percent of wives

who earn more 

than their 

husbands 1

Married-couple 

families in which 

both wife and 

husband had 

earnings from 

work

Wives who earn

more than 

their

husbands 2

Percent of wives

who earn more 

than their 

husbands 2

1987.................. 32,025 7,581 23.7 29,755 5,311 17.8

1988.................. 32,810 7,827 23.9 30,503 5,520 18.1

1989.................. 33,119 8,068 24.4 30,848 5,796 18.8

1990.................. 33,093 8,221 24.8 30,794 5,923 19.2

1991.................. 33,516 8,983 26.8 30,998 6,465 20.9

1992.................. 33,987 9,715 28.6 31,221 6,948 22.3

1993.................. 34,286 10,000 29.2 31,264 6,978 22.3

1994.................. 35,066 10,184 29.0 32,091 7,209 22.5

1995.................. 34,819 9,822 28.2 32,030 7,033 22.0

1996.................. 35,120 10,070 28.7 32,389 7,340 22.7

1997.................. 35,613 10,309 28.9 32,745 7,441 22.7

1998.................. 35,806 10,467 29.2 32,782 7,443 22.7

1999.................. 36,454 10,548 28.9 33,340 7,434 22.3

2000.................. 37,037 11,070 29.9 33,873 7,906 23.3

2001.................. 36,864 11,329 30.7 33,665 8,130 24.1

2002.................. 36,905 11,765 31.9 33,531 8,391 25.0

2003.................. 36,761 11,923 32.4 33,189 8,351 25.2

2004.................. 36,710 11,985 32.6 33,110 8,386 25.3

2005.................. 37,055 12,215 33.0 33,364 8,524 25.5

2006.................. 37,733 12,601 33.4 33,838 8,707 25.7

2007.................. 37,536 12,570 33.5 33,678 8,712 25.9

Year

Families in which wives have earnings 

but husbands may not

Families in which both wives and husbands 

have earnings

1 Includes families in which husband had no earnings

from work. 2 Excludes families in which husband had no earnings

from work.

NOTE: These data, collected in the Annual Social

and Economic Supplement, reflect the earnings and work

experience of the entire year. 

SOURCE: Annual Social and Economic

Supplements, 1988-2008, Current Population Survey,

U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor

Statistics.

78
Exhibit 10.50

LOGO

February 22,
2008

Edmund
L. Quatmann, Jr.
c/o iPCS, Inc.
1901 N. Roselle Road
Schaumburg, IL 60195

Dear
Mr. Quatmann:

Reference
is made to the Employment Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2007 (the "Employment Agreement"), between you and iPCS Wireless, Inc. Capitalized terms used herein but
not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement.

I
am pleased to inform you that the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors took the following actions effective January 1, 2008:





This
constitutes an amendment of your Employment Agreement. Please acknowledge this amendment by countersigning below.

|                                                        |                             | Very truly yours,          
|------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | ---------------------------
|                                                        |                             | iPCS, Inc.                 
|                                                        |                             | By:                        
|                                                        |                             | Name:  Timothy M. Yager    
|                                                        |                             | Title:    CEO and President
|AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED
this 22nd day of February, 2008 |                             |                            
|By:                                                     | /s/ Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr. |                            

---



QuickLinks
utahmedicalexh109.htm










EXHIBIT 14







SUMMARY OF OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION












The Employment Agreement in Exhibit 6 of this report is the only written contractual compensation arrangement the Company has with any of its directors and Executive Officers.







During 2013, the Company’s Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officers (the Company’s “Named Executive Officers”) are scheduled to receive the following compensation from the Company:


 



	
Compensation Arrangement

	 	
2013 Scheduled Amount


	
Base salary

	 	
$ 234,000 (CEO); $106,000 (PFO)


	
401(k) matching contributions

	 	
6,120 (maximum)


	
Section 125 plan matching contributions (1)

	 	
500 (maximum)


	
Management bonus

	 	
will be determined at year-end


	
Pet health benefits (1)

	 	
500 (maximum)


	
Family medical benefits (1)

	 	
will depend on future events


	
Travel expense reimbursement (2)

	 	
15,000 (CEO); 500 (PFO)







 


During 2013, the Company’s Directors are scheduled to receive the following compensation from the Company:








	
Compensation Arrangement

	 	
Ernst Hoyer

	 	 	
Barbara Payne

	 	 	
James Beeson

	 
	
Base

	 	$	25,000	 	 	$	25,000	 	 	$	25,000	 
	
Executive Committee

	 	 	4,000	 	 	 	-	 	 	 	-	 
	
Audit Committee Chairman

	 	 	3,000	 	 	 	-	 	 	 	-	 
	
Travel Expense Reimbursement (2)

	 	 	500	 	 	 	700	 	 	 	500	 










(1) CEO and PFO participate on the same basis as other eligible employees.


 


(2) Estimated 2013 travel expenses on behalf of UTMD business. The Company reimburses its employees and directors for authorized business expenses.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form
10-2SB 9/30/96 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,909,907
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  751,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                   30,371
<INVENTORY>                                    193,789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,953,427
<PP&E>                                         5,555,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,497,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,072,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,204,412
<BONDS>                                        7,277,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,495
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,620,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,072,074
<SALES>                                        3,756,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,756,545
<CGS>                                          2,461,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,308,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,594,026
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               41,243
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,639,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,586,322)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   14,096
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,600,418)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,600,418)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.44)
        


</TABLE>
#### Bert V.E. PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George TRENT; Donna Kuroski; Ashley Ginanni; John Doe, Unknown, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-7224.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2012.

*308Bert V.E. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Llewellyn Deniker, Sara Ellen Hauptfuehrer, Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC, Bridgeport, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bert V.E. Parker appeals the district court’s orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing Parker’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying Parker’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Parker v. Trent,*No. l:10-cv-00120-IMK-DJJ (ND.W.Va. Jan. 10 *&*June 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                     241,361,080
<SECURITIES>                                13,236,237
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,668,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,583,165
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           276,718,891
<PP&E>                                     192,612,870
<DEPRECIATION>                             (27,619,126)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             519,484,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,761,448
<BONDS>                                    385,130,826
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       164,549
<OTHER-SE>                                 134,188,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               519,484,052
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            64,333,127
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,044,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,068,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               714,165
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          24,178,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (35,641,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (35,641,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (35,641,583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2059

BERTHA R. LAWSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS, Department of Veterans Affairs,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

HERSHEL GOBER, Acting Secretary, Department of

Veterans Affairs,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-00-851-7)

Submitted: December 17, 2001 Decided: January 14, 2002

Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Bertha R. Lawson, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Corcoran, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Bertha Ruth Lawson appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on her claims

of discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to

2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,

29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-797 (West 1999 & Supp. 2001), and the Americans

with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West

1995 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lawson v. Principi,

No. CA-00-851-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# 17SNR05_00

# image1.png
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 825 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 825

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7401 West 100th Place in Bridgeview, Illinois, as the ``Michael J. 
                     Healy Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2003

   Mr. Lipinski (for himself, Mr. Rush, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. 
Gutierrez, Mr. Emanuel, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Crane, Ms. 
   Schakowsky, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Weller, Mr. Costello, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. 
Hastert, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Evans, Mr. LaHood, 
 and Mr. Shimkus) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7401 West 100th Place in Bridgeview, Illinois, as the ``Michael J. 
                     Healy Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MICHAEL J. HEALY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 7401 West 100th Place in Bridgeview, Illinois, and 
known as the Moraine Valley Post Office, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Michael J. Healy Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Michael J. 
Healy Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simula, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John A. Jenson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                        
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company for the periods presented.



| | /s/ John A. Jenson
John A. Jenson
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PGEM - EX10.17 - 2012.21.31 - 10K


Exhibit  10.17














December 17, 2012
John C. Wayne
1431 Canterbury Road
Raleigh, NC  27608


Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear John:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated December 31, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2013.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgement and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.


	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ John C. Wayne
	 

	John C. Wayne
[No. 55530-8-I.

Division One.

December 19, 2005.]

#### HCM Partnership et al., *Appellants,*v. Jack A. Johnson et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 03-2-06808-8, Richard J. Thorpe, J., entered December 10, 2004. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.