alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE 202ND DISTRIC T COURT OF BOWIE COU NTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 3rd day of September , A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Reginald Reece, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 14

- 00192

- CR

Trial Court No. 11F0746

- 202

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Reginald Reece, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City o f Texarkana, this the 5th day of November , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
EXHIBIT 11
                            FOCUS ENHANCEMENTS, INC.
              STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                       Three months ended
                                                                              March 31,                 March 31,
                                                                                1997                       1996
                                                                         --------------------      ---------------------

<S>                                                                       <C>                      <C>
Net income (loss)                                                         $           16,476       $         (3,644,851)
                                                                         ====================      =====================

Primary:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                              11,530,607                  7,382,665
Weighted average common equivalent shares                                            627,521                          -
                                                                         --------------------      ---------------------

Weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding used to calculate per share data                               12,158,128                  7,382,665
                                                                         ====================      =====================

Fully diluted:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                              11,530,607                  7,382,665
Weighted average common equivalent shares                                            570,220                          -
                                                                         --------------------      ---------------------

Weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding used to calculate per share data                               12,100,827                  7,382,665
                                                                         ====================      =====================

Net income (loss) per share
        Primary                                                           $             0.00       $              (0.49)
                                                                         ====================      =====================
        Fully diluted                                                     $             0.00       $              (0.49)
                                                                         ====================      =====================


The  accompanying  notes  are an  integral  part of the  consolidated  financial
statements.

                                       22
</TABLE>
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 26 toRegistration Statement No. 333-67455 on Form N-1A of our report dated December 10, 2013, relating to the financial statements andfinancial highlights of New World Fund, Inc. appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of such RegistrationStatement, and to the references to us under the headings “Financial highlights” in the Prospectus and “Independentregistered public accounting firm” and “Prospectuses, reports to shareholders and proxy statements” in the Statementof Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement.

 

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Costa Mesa, California

August 27, 2014
Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Prospectus  and
Statement of Additional  Information  constituting parts of this  Post-Effective
Amendment No. 14 to the registration  statement on Form N-1A (the  "Registration
Statement")  of our report dated  December 15, 1995,  relating to the  financial
statements  and  selected  per share  data and  ratios  (incorporated  under the
heading  to the  financial  statements  and  selected  per share data and ratios
(Incorporated  under  the  heading  "Financial  Highlights")  appearing  in  the
November 30, 1995 Annual Report to Shareowners of The Saturna  Investment Trust,
which is also incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement. We also
consent to the references to us under the heading "Financial  Highlights" in the
Prospectus and under the headings  "Investment  Advisory and Other Services" and
"Financial Statements" in the Statement of Additional Information.

Price Waterhouse LLP

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 15, 1996
**Exhibit 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Yu Yibo, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of PetroChina Company Limited (the “Company”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financialreporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 25, 2014
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-126586and No. 333-122676 on Form S-8 of our report relating tothe consolidated financial statements of iPCS, Inc. and Subsidiaries datedDecember 21, 2005 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the preparation of the financialstatements in conformity with AICPA Statement of Position 90-7, “Financial Reporting for Entities inReorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code”), appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of iPCS, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the yearended September 30, 2005.

| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
|------------------------------------|
| Davenport, Iowa                    |
| December 21, 2005             |

 

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 966

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reinstate the vocational training 

program of the Department of Veterans Affairs for certain low-income 

veterans in receipt of pension from that Department. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2003

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. SMITH of 

New Jersey, and Mr. EVANS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reinstate the 

vocational training program of the Department of Veterans Affairs for certain low-income veterans in receipt 

of pension from that Department.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Veterans’ Re5 turn-to-Work Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 966 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF VETERANS VOCATIONAL 

2 TRAINING PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN PENSION 

3 RECIPIENTS. 

4 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW PROGRAM PERIOD.—

5 Subsection (a)(3) of section 1524 of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the period beginning 

7 on February 1, 1985, and ending on December 31, 1995’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘the five-year period beginning on the date 

9 of the enactment of the Disabled Veterans’ Return-to10 Work Act of 2003’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b)(4) 

12 of such section is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 

13 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘the end of the program period’’. 

14 (c) OUTREACH.—Such section is further amended by 

15 adding at the end the following new subsection: 

16 ‘‘(f) The Secretary shall ensure that the availability 

17 of vocational training under this section is made known 

18 through a variety of means, including the Internet and an19 nouncements in Department publications and other vet20 erans’ publications.’’. 

21 (d) REPORTS.—Such section is further amended by 

22 adding at the end the following new subsection: 

23 ‘‘(g) Not later than two years after the date of the 

24 enactment of the Disabled Veterans’ Return-to-Work Act 

25 of 2003, and each year thereafter, the Secretary shall sub26 mit to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate 
3

•HR 966 IH 

1 and House of Representatives a report on the operation 

2 of this section. The report shall set forth an evaluation 

3 of the vocational training provided under this section for 

4 the period involved, and shall include an analysis of the 

5 cost-effectiveness of the vocational training provided under 

6 this section as well as data on the entered-employment 

7 rate of veterans pursuing such vocational training.’’. 

8 (e) STYLISTIC AMENDMENTS.—Such section is fur9 ther amended—

10 (1) by striking ‘‘of Veterans Affairs’’ in sub11 section (a)(1); and 

12 (2) by striking ‘‘of this section’’ in subsections 

13 (a)(2), (b)(1), (b)(4) (both places it appears), (c), 

14 (d), and (e).

Æ
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 136795 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 136795 COA: 282510 Monroe CC: 77-016787-FY GAYLORD CLYDE WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

p1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
#### CITY OF TOMBSTONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Department of Agriculture; Tom Vilsak, Secretary of Agriculture; Tom Tidwell, Chief Forester of the USDA Forest Service; Corbin Newman, Regional Forester for the Southwestern Region of the U.S., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-16172.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 4, 2012.

Filed Dec. 21, 2012.

*682David C. Shilton, Joanna Brinkman, Mark R. Haag, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Casandra Casaaus Currie, USDA Office of General Counsel, Albuquerque, NM, Charles Alexander Davis, Assistant U.S., USTU-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, THOMAS, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

The City of Tombstone, Arizona, appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to use motorized vehicles and heavy equipment to repair and to restore its Huachuca Mountain water infrastructure without Forest Service authorization. Although Tombstone has alleged it has access rights to certain water springs on federal land by virtue of nineteenth-century vested property rights and a 1962 Special Use Permit, the contours of any such entitlements have yet to be adjudicated definitively. The underlying case remains pending in the district court.

On this record, we conclude that Tombstone failed to raise serious questions going to the merits of its Tenth Amendment challenge and we do not reach whether the City has satisfied the other requirements for a preliminary injunction. *See Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell,*632 F.3d 1127, 1135 (9th Cir.2011). Assuming without deciding that the Tenth Amendment constrains the Forest Service’s authority to regulate Tombstone’s activities under the Property Clause, no unlawful commandeering has been shown. *See, e.g., Printz v. United States,*521 U.S. 898, 925-26, 117 S.Ct. 2365, 138 L.Ed.2d 914 (1997); *New York v. United States,*505 U.S. 144, 175-76, 112 S.Ct. 2408, 120 L.Ed.2d 120 (1992). There is no evidence that Tombstone was compelled “to enact any laws or regulations,” or “to assist in the enforcement of federal statutes regulating private individuals.” *Reno v. Condon,*528 U.S. 141, 151, 120 S.Ct. 666, 145 L.Ed.2d 587 (2000).

It is the Supreme Court’s prerogative alone to overrule its precedents. *Nunez-Reyes v. Holder,*646 F.3d 684, 692 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc). We therefore have no authority to apply the traditional or integral governmental functions test Tombstone has urged. *See Nat’l League of Cities v. Usery,*426 U.S. 833, 852, 96 S.Ct. 2465, 49 L.Ed.2d 245 (1976), *overruled by Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Auth.,*469 U.S. 528, 556-57, 105 S.Ct. 1005, 83 L.Ed.2d 1016 (1985).

Coalition of Arizona/New Mexico Counties for Stable Economic Growth’s motion for permission to participate as an amicus curiae is granted.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         134,462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,291
<INVENTORY>                                     12,491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               223,028
<PP&E>                                          66,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,421
<BONDS>                                         10,534
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,631
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,942
<SALES>                                        104,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,817
<CGS>                                           65,558
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,769
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,733
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,036
<DISCONTINUED>                                  27,889
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,925
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.87


</TABLE>
###                                      The AAL Mutual Funds
Case 2:11-cr-00225-SDW Document 26 Filed 09/11/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 80
Case 2:11-cr-00225-SDW Document 26 Filed 09/11/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 81
Case 2:11-cr-00225-SDW Document 26 Filed 09/11/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 82
# 19QRTL2_00
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Matritech, Inc. (the registrant):2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be
designed under our
supervision, to ensure that
material information relating
to the registrant, including
its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those
entities, particularly during
the period in which this
report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Paragraph omitted in
accordance with SEC
transition instructions
contained in SEC Release
33-8238, 34-47986 and
33-8760.]c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrants
disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this
report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants
internal control over
financial reporting that
occurred during the
registrants first fiscal
quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal
control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of
internal controls over
financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to
adversely affect the
registrants ability to
record, process, summarize
and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves
management or other employees
who have a significant role
in the registrants internal
controls over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Richard A. Sandberg

Richard A. SandbergChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 124 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 5, 2003.
    Resolved, That the following named Members and Delegates be, and they are 
hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Ryan of Ohio (to rank immediately after Mr. 
Alexander).
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: Mr. Bishop of New York (to rank 
immediately after Mr. Ryan of Ohio).
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Sanders (to rank immediately after Ms. 
Waters).
    Committee on Government Reform: Mr. Sanders (to rank immediately after Mr. 
Kanjorski) and Mr. Cooper (to rank immediately after Ms. Norton).
    Committee on Resources: Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. Markey, Mr. 
Hinojosa, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Baca, and Ms. McCollum.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Cardoza (to rank immediately after Mr. Matheson), 
Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas (to rank immediately after Mr. Davis of Tennessee), and 
Ms. Lofgren (to rank immediately after Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas).
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Faleomavaega (to rank immediately after Mr. 
Ballance) and Ms. Linda T. Sanchez.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```