alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Advance copies of this statement are made available to the 

press under lock-up conditions with the explicit 

understanding that the data are embargoed until 8:30 a.m. 

Eastern Daylight Time.

Statement of

Philip L. Rones

Deputy Commissioner

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Friday, June 1, 2007

Nonfarm payroll employment rose by 157,000 in May to 

137.8 million. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.5 

percent. Job growth continued in a number of serviceproviding industries, while employment declined in 

manufacturing. In the first 5 months of 2007, payroll job 

growth averaged 133,000 per month, compared with 189,000 

per month in 2006. 

Food services and drinking places added 35,000 jobs in 

May and 361,000 over the year. Over the month, health care 

employment grew by 25,000, with gains in hospitals and 

ambulatory health care services. Employment in social 

assistance continued to rise; the industry added 32,000 

jobs over the last 3 months. 
2

Within professional and technical services, employment 

increased in computer systems design and in architectural 

and engineering services. Elsewhere in the serviceproviding sector, employment continued to trend up in 

wholesale trade, information, and private education. 

Employment in financial activities was essentially 

unchanged over the month, reflecting offsetting movements 

in its component industries. 

Manufacturing employment continued to decline in May 

(-19,000), reflecting a large job loss in motor vehicles 

and parts (-10,000) and smaller declines in other 

industries. Over the year, manufacturing lost 164,000 

jobs; nearly half were in the motor vehicle and parts 

industry. Average weekly hours and overtime in factories 

each fell by 0.1 hour in May to 41.0 and 4.1 hours, 

respectively. 

Construction employment was unchanged in May. Since 

its recent peak in September, construction employment has 

decreased by 54,000. Elsewhere in the goods-producing 

sector, mining employment continued its upward trend in 

May. 

Average hourly earnings for private production and 

nonsupervisory workers rose by 6 cents (0.3 percent) to 
3

$17.30 in May. Over the year, average hourly earnings 

increased by 3.8 percent. 

Results from the survey of households showed that both 

the unemployment rate, at 4.5 percent, and the number of 

unemployed, at 6.8 million, were unchanged over the month. 

The unemployment rate has ranged from 4.4 to 4.6 percent 

since last September. The proportion of the overall 

population that was employed in May--63.0 percent-—was 

unchanged from April; the rate is down from its recent high 

of 63.4 percent in December. The number of persons who 

worked part time for reasons such as slack work or the 

inability to find full-time work was about unchanged over 

the month but has risen by 332,000 over the year. 

In summary, nonfarm payroll employment rose by 157,000 

in May, and the unemployment rate held at 4.5 percent.
#### JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA GREYHOUND LINES, Inc., et al.

No. 10208.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Feb. 8, 1950.

*154Freedman, Landy & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Harold Scott Baile, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

The action is by a passenger on a bus of the defendant, Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, to recover for injuries incurred in a collision in Philadelphia with a bus owned by the defendant, Philadelphia Transportation Company. The plaintiff is a resident of Boston.

After answer filed, the defendant, Philadelphia Transportation Company, served notice of intention to take the deposition of the plaintiff upon oral examination, the place specified being in Philadelphia. The plaintiff has moved under Rule 30(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A., for a protective order requiring the defendant to elect either (a) to pay the plaintiff’s travel expenses to and maintenance in Philadelphia in connection with the taking of her deposition here, (b) to take the deposition in Boston or (c) to proceed by written interrogatories. In support of the motion the plaintiff has filed an affidavit stating that, because of her physical condition resulting from the injuries, she has been and is unable to earn any money and that she has no savings or no source of income whatever and that she is living with her son-in-law and being supported by him.

Rule 30(b) has always been construed as authorizing orders of the kind asked for by the plaintiff and the Court is given a wide discretion.

In a number of New York cases, relief similar to that asked for by the plaintiff has been granted. In doing so the Court acted in conformity with a local rule and, therefore, the cases d'o not quite meet the issue here presented. However, the adoption of the local rule may be taken as an indication of the general policy of •the District Court of New York and, of course, indicates that the Court does not consider that policy in conflict with the spirit of the Federal Rules. In Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales S. A. v. Clark, 8 F.R.D. 565, the District Court for the District of Columbia ordered the Attorney General, who had noticed the plaintiff to take depositions of its officers in Washington, to pay the expenses of the officers from Switzerland. Of course, the conditions of the case were not much like the present one but it may be noted that there is nothing to show that the plaintiff itself was not fully able to pay the expenses of bringing its officers to Washington.

Under the circumstances of this case I regard the order as a proper one and it will be entered as prayed for.
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4-2 Filed 06/03/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 109
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4-2 Filed 06/03/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 110
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4-2 Filed 06/03/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 111
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4-2 Filed 06/03/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 112
Case 3:11-cv-03183-FLW-TJB Document 4-2 Filed 06/03/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 113
Exhibit 10.6



August 11, 2000



Douglas A. Melton, Ph.D.

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology

Harvard University

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

7 Divinity Avenue

Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138



Dear Doug,



On behalf of Curis, Inc., I would like to extent two important invitations:



|I. | Member, Board of Directors
|-- | --------------------------



First, I would like to invite to you to become a member of Curis Board of Directors. It would be a privilege and a pleasure to have you join our professional panel. Your tenure and experience would certainly be
a valuable contribution to the organization.



As a member of Curis Board,
you would receive cash payments in the amount of an annual retainer of $10,000, as well as $1,000 for each board of directors meeting attended in person, and $500 for board meetings held by telephone conference call.



You would also be eligible to participate in Curis 2000 Director Stock Option Plan.
Under this plan, you would receive an initial grant of stock options to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock, which will be fully vested at the end of four years; and each year you will receive a grant of options to purchase 5,000 shares of stock.



|II. | Chairman, Scientific Advisory Board
|--- | -----------------------------------



I would also like to extend an invitation for you to become the Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Board. As our chairman, I am certain we would all benefit from your
strong intellectual and scientific leadership.



In this position, you would
receive cash payments in the amount of an annual retainer of $75,000. You would also be eligible to receive options to purchase an additional 25,000 shares of common stock.



We are very excited about the future of Curis. As a member of our Boards, you would be joining us to make key decisions and plans that will
help shape the direction and future of the company  and, perhaps, the industry.



Please contact my office at your earliest convenience to schedule a time to discuss this further. I look forward to hearing from you.



|                          
|--------------------------
|Yours sincerely,          
|                          
|/s/    DOROS PLATIKA, M.D.
|                          
|President and CEO
#### Barbara Scanzano, Appellant, v Stuart Horowitz, Defendant, and Roger Kersten et al., Respondents.

[854 NYS2d 734]

*856The Supreme Court incorrectly concluded that the cause of action to recover damages for wrongful death was time-barred insofar as asserted against the defendants Roger Kersten and Roger Kersten, D.O., P.C. (hereinafter collectively Dr. Kersten), and partially time-barred insofar as asserted against the defendant Long Island Cardiology and Internal Medicine (hereinafter LICIM). Pursuant to EPTL 5-4.1, a cause of action to recover damages for wrongful death may be maintained against persons “who would have been liable to the decedent by reason of such wrongful conduct if death had not ensued. Such an action must be commenced within two years after the decedent’s death.” At the time of the decedent’s death, the decedent had a cause of action to recover damages for medical malpractice against Dr. Kersten and LICIM, which was Dr. Kersten’s employer *(see Hill v St. Clare’s Hosp.,*67 NY2d 72, 79 [1986]), that was not time-barred *(see*CPLR 214-a; *Murphy v Jacoby,*250 AD2d 826 [1998]; *Suarez v Phelps Mem. Hosp. Assn.,*130 AD2d 571 [1987]; *Marlowe v DuPont deNemours & Co.,*112 AD2d 769, 771 [1985]). Furthermore, the plaintiff, who is the decedent’s widow *857and personal representative, asserted the cause of action against Dr. Kersten and LICIM within two years after the decedent’s death *(see*EPTL 5-4.1 [1]). Accordingly, upon reargument, the Supreme Court should have adhered to the prior determination denying those branches of the motion of Dr. Kersten and LICIM which were to dismiss the cause of action to recover damages for wrongful death insofar as asserted against them. Mastro, J.P., Covello, Eng and Belen, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES SAVINGS & LOAN CO. v. PARKER et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 25, 1903.)

No. 916.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon.

J. Thorburn Ross, E. B. Seabrook, Wm. A. Munly, and John K. Kollock, for appellant. J. Q. A. Bowlby, for appellee H. B. Parker.

Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of The Pacific States Savings, Loan and Building Company, a corporation, v. Lizzie A. Green et al. (just decided) 123 Fed. 43, the judgment is reversed, and cause remanded to the court below, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the bill, with leave to the defendants to answer.
**i OFFICE**  **OF THE**  **ATTORNEY GENERAL**  **OF TEXAS** 

**I AUSTIN** 

**OROVER**

**SELLERS mToRNEr** 

**GENERIL**

HonorableLeonard Carlton, ComzIsaIoner Bureau or Labor Statiatios Austin 11, Te xa a Dear Sir:

**Your reoent**  **request** ror mnt has been reoelvedand reads

"I would like your seed 011 Ml11 Boilers. would these boiler8 be o

Annotated Civil as follow8: 0 lnrlts to Tour e 62210, Velnon'a ioh raatla,

in part,

d a aeertlfioata

of operereinafterprorided~for, rovialonspbrtlnent to our Inquiryappear Bollare used exoluelrelyror agrioulturs

purposes Y3ubseo. 6. Boilers used for cotton gin~.~ To ooma under the exemptionprovided In Subseotion 4, the Cotton Seed Oil Ml1 Boiler rmst be used exolusivslj**for** ***agriculture** purposes." **“ AgriCult~o~**  is defined In the oaae of Gordon vs. Buster, 257 3. 1%. 220, 113 Tex. %32, In the iollowing lanpuage:HonorableLeonard Carlton - page 2
mqA$Tioultureq,

Is ti.a art or aolenoe of oultlvating the ,?round, lnoludlngharvestingthe crops and rearing and managementof live ntock; husbandry;farming; In a broader ambe, the fmlence and art of the produotlonor planta amI animals userul to **min. ”**  In the light of the above deflnltlon,it la **our** opinion that a boiler used ln oonneotlon with a ootton seed 011 mill is not exempt under the etatute as one Weed ercluslvelyror agrloulture **purposea. ”**  It la claar to us that a ootton seed 011 **IILIU 1s**  **engaged In**  **a manuraoturlnE,**  prooess,

For additionalauthorities6ee Keeeeny VI. Beaeman, 169 Md. 582, 102 **A.** 666; ?Wndell vi Swedlund, 59 Idrr 29, 80 P. 2d 13.

Our views on the quelrtion **are rtrengtheneb**  by the Legielature'alnoluslonin the statute,**a** speoltlo emmptlon in ravor or ootton gin boilers. If ootton eeed otlaill boilerswere within the purview 0r the exemption in ravor of boilers ured for Waq$loulture purposeen,certsiuly 4 cotton gin boiler would also **be** lnoludedand there would have been no reason or neoeesity for the speoifioexemption for gln8. It is therrf'ore **our** oonolwion that neither under the ooznxon

deflnltlonand understandingof the term **“ agri.Oul.-**  ture purposesn or under the speoiilo intent evidencedby the Iaplsletusein the enaotmentof this statute doe8 the cotton seed oil till boiler fall within the exemption inquired**about. Ywrs**  very truly



# I 

# 4 Benjamin ?:oodall Assistant
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Infinite  Group Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Michael S. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

      A signed  original  of this  written  statement  has been  provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.



November 11, 2005                   /s/ MICHAEL S. SMITH
                                    ---------------------
                                    Michael S. Smith
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Chief Financial Officer






                                       25
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                 EXHIBIT (12)(B)
 
                  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED
                  FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
 
                                ($ IN MILLIONS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                  -----------------------------------------------
                                                   1996       1995      1994      1993      1992
                                                  -------     -----     -----     -----     -----
<S>                                               <C>         <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes and
  minority interest............................   $(1,298)    $   2     $ (10)    $(233)    $ 267
Less: Equity in income (loss) of 50 percent or
  less owned affiliates........................         9         3        (2)       (3)       (1)
Add: Combined fixed charges and preferred
  dividends....................................       557       378       287       258       240
                                                  -------     -----     -----     -----     -----
Earnings as adjusted...........................   $  (750)    $ 377     $ 279     $  28     $ 508
                                                  =======     =====     =====     =====     =====
Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends:
     Interest expense..........................   $   456     $ 236     $ 134     $ 164     $ 169
     Rental expense............................        28        18        21        22        31
     Pre-tax earnings required to cover
       preferred dividend requirements (b).....        73       124       132        72        40
                                                  -------     -----     -----     -----     -----
Total combined fixed charges and
  preferred dividends..........................   $   557     $ 378     $ 287     $ 258     $ 240
                                                  =======     =====     =====     =====     =====
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
  preferred dividends..........................        (a)       (a)       (a)       (a)     2.12x
                                                  =======     =====     =====     =====     =====
</TABLE>
 
---------
 
(a) Additional income before income taxes and minority interest necessary to
    attain a ratio of 1.00x for 1996, 1995, 1994 and 1993 would be $1,307
    million, $1 million, $8 million, and $230 million, respectively.
 
(b) Dividend requirement divided by 100% minus the effective income tax rate or
    the statutory rate, whichever is more appropriate.
# AMANA MUTUAL FUNDS TRUST

# Proposed Resolution

**Resolved**, that theproposed Fidelity Bond coverage under the Investment Company Blanket Bond ofICI Mutual Insurance Company, to expire December 15, 2014, under which theTrust, Saturna Capital Corporation, Saturna Investment Trust and SaturnaBrokerage Services, Inc. are joint insureds, be, and hereby is, determined tobe reasonable in amount in view of all the circumstances and with considerationincluding, but not limited to, (i) the number of other parties named asinsureds, (ii) the nature of the business activities of such other parties,(iii) the amount of the joint insured bond, (iv) the amount of the premium forsuch bond, (v) the ratable allocation of the premium among all parties named asinsureds, (vi) the extent to which the share of the premium allocated to theTrust is less than the premium the Trust would have had to pay if it hadprovided and maintained a single insured bond, (vii) the value of theanticipated aggregate assets of the Trust to which any covered persons haveaccess; (viii) peer fund coverages; and (ix) the nature of the securities to beheld in the portfolios of the Trust; and be it

**Further Resolved**,that the proposed D&O/E&OInsurance of ICI Mutual Insurance Company, to expire December 15, 2014, underwhich the Trust, Saturna Capital Corporation, Saturna Trust Company, SaturnaBrokerage Services, Inc. and Saturna Investment Trust are joint insureds, be,and hereby is, determined to be reasonable and of benefit to the shareowners ofthe Trust; and be it

**Further Resolved**, that pro-rataallocation of the premiums for the Fidelity Bond and D&O/E&O Insuranceprovided by ICI Mutual Insurance Company among each of the portfolios of theTrust is approved; and be it

**Further Resolved**, that participation by the Trust in thejoint liability insurance policies is in the best interest of each of theportfolios of the Trust; and be it

**FurtherResolved,** that the participation by the Trust in the joint Fidelity Bondand D&O/E&O Insurance are fair and reasonable pro-rata to each of theportfolios of the Trust; and be it

**FurtherResolved,**that the benefits of continuing a joint fidelity bond from the ICIMutual Insurance Company, including the opportunity to obtain stable low-costinsurance coverage from ICI Mutual, justify maintaining reserve premiums andmaking commitments for additional payments, including acceptance ofrestrictions upon the withdrawal of reserve premiums.

**FurtherResolved,**that the Secretary of the Trust is appointed as the officer responsibleto file executed fidelity bonds annually as required by Rule 17g-1(h) of theInvestment Company Act, including a copy of the executed joint insured bond anda resolution by the majority of the disinterested trustees approving theamount, type, form and coverage of the bond and the portion of the premium tobe paid by each insured company.
Exhibit 32(i)



Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-KSB filed by
American Community Bancshares, Inc. (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in
that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                     |  |                                     |  |                                    
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                     |  | American Community Bancshares, Inc.
|                     |  |                                    
|Date: March 25, 2005 |  | By:                                 |  | /s/ Randy P. Helton                
|                     |  |                                     |  | Randy P. Helton                    
|                     |  |                                     |  | President & Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2168

In Re: KODILINYE OGONNA OJUKWU,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (8:09-cr-00470-PJM; 8:09-cv-02238-PJM; 8:09-mj-01457-TMD)

Submitted: February 8, 2010 Decided: February 16, 2010

Before MICHAEL, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kodilinye Ogonna Ojukwu, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kodilinye Ogonna Ojukwu has filed a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus challenging his ongoing detention and raising Fourth Amendment search and seizure issues related to his ongoing criminal trial in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Because Ojukwu is not currently incarcerated within the Fourth Circuit, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(a) (2006) (providing that a § 2241 petition must be filed in the district or circuit of incarceration); In re Jones , 226 F.3d 328, 332 (4th Cir. 2000). Moreover, because the issues that Ojukwu seeks to raise may be adequately addressed through pretrial motion s at his criminal trial, we find that it would not serve the interest of justice to transfer the petition to the United States District Court for

the District of Columbia. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2006). We therefore deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350.

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael P. Gray, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 14, 2008



/s/ MICHAEL P. GRAYMichael P. GrayChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)