alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36302-36303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17464]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6706]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Roaring Tigers and Leaping Carp: Decoding the 
Symbolic Language of Chinese Animal Painting''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to

[[Page 36303]]

the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 
1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 
[68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in the exhibition: 
``Roaring Tigers and Leaping Carp: Decoding the Symbolic Language of 
Chinese Animal Painting,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display 
of the exhibit objects at the Cincinnati Art Museum, Cincinnati, OH, 
from on or about October 9, 2009, until on or about January 3, 2010, 
and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is 
ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202-
453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: July 14, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-17464 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Joseph P. La Sala 

MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY &

 CARPENTER, LLP

1300 Mount Kemble Avenue

P.O. Box 2075

Morristown, NJ 07962-2075 

Tel.: (973) 993-8100

Fax: (973) 425-0161

Jlasala@mdmc-law.com

Attorneys for Defendants Express Scripts, Inc., Aristotle Holding, Inc., Aristotle Merger Sub, 

Inc. and Plato Merger Sub, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN RE:

MEDCO/EXPRESS SCRIPTS MERGER 

LITIGATION

Civil Action No. 11-4211 (DMC) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Joseph P. La Sala, Esq., certify that on September 6, 2011, I served true and accurate

copies of the Express Scripts' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class 

Certification, the September 6, 2011 Certification of Joseph P. LaSala, Esq. in Opposition to

Plaintiff’s Motion For Class Certification with Exhibits A-D, and this Certificate of Service upon 

all counsel of record in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the electronic

filing rules of the United States District Court, District of New Jersey. 

Dated: September 6, 2011 /s/ Joseph P. La Sala

Joseph P. La Sala

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 47-6 Filed 09/06/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 2513
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

ERIC SAMUAL OLGUIN, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 22-0248 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2017-002927-001

The Honorable Kevin B. Wein, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Krista Wood

Counsel for Respondent

Zhivago Law PLLC, Phoenix

By Kerrie D. Zhivago

Counsel for Petitioner

FILED 12-13-2022
STATE v. OLGUIN

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Samuel A. Thumma, Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, and Vice 

Chief Judge David B. Gass delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Eric Samual Olguin seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is Olguin’s first petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or legal error, this court will not 

disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. See 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577 ¶ 19 (2012). Petitioner has the burden to 

show that the superior court erred in denying the petition for postconviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538 ¶ 1 (App. 2011).

¶3 This court has reviewed the record in this matter, the order 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief and the petition for review. 

This court finds the petitioner has not established error. 

¶4 This court grants review but denies relief.
Exhibit
32.1
  Certification
Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 (as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In
connection with the Annual report of TransWorld Benefits International,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the years ended June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Charles Seven, as Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, TransWorld
Benefits International Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:
 
 1.
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and
 
 2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:  
April 29, 2008
  TransWorld
Benefits International, Inc.
  /s/  Charles
Seven
 Charles Seven
 Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         32,504
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                   42,417
<INVENTORY>                                    56,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               381,901
<PP&E>                                         234,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                 104,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,509,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          386,520
<BONDS>                                        1,602,112
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          438,375
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       779,633
<OTHER-SE>                                     (735,484)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,509,109
<SALES>                                        995,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               995,051
<CGS>                                          250,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               695,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             90,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (47,273)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (47,273)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (47,273)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        


</TABLE>
#### Jane S. DUTTON, Representative of the Estate of Marshall Lawrence Dutton v. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT, DIVISION OF UNITED AIRCRAFT CORPORATION.

Civ. A. No. 7623.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

May 19, 1959.

Charles N. Segal, Gerald C. McLaughlin, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff.

Frank E. Callahan, John D. Fassett, of Wiggin & Dana, New Haven, Conn., for defendant.

J. JOSEPH SMITH, Chief Judge.

This is an action in two counts brought by the representative of the estate of a marine killed in the crash in Georgia of a helicopter manufactured and sold by *515defendant in Connecticut. The first count sounds in negligence, the second in breach of warranty. Defendant moves under Rule 12(b), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S. C.A., to dismiss the second count on two grounds, lack of privity essential under Connecticut law, and failure of the Georgia Wrongful Death Act to provide recovery for death caused by breach of warranty.

The first ground is well taken. Borucki v. MacKenzie Bros. Co., 1938, 125 Conn. 92, 3 A.2d 224; Tralli v. Triple *X*Stores, 1954, 19 Conn.Sup. 293, 112 A.2d 507; Hermanson v. Hermanson, 1954, 19 Conn.Sup. 479, 117 A.2d 840; Barrett v. Air Reduction Co., 1955, 19 Conn.Sup. 500, 118 A.2d 629.

The second ground is also well taken. The Georgia Wrongful Death Statute confines recovery to cases where the death is caused by crime or criminal or other negligence. Ga.Code § 105-1301.

The motion to dismiss the second count for failure to state a claim on which' relief can be granted is granted. The second count is ordered dismissed.
[Nos. 23318-9-III; 23339-1-III.

Division Three.

December 20, 2005.]

#### The City of Wenatchee, *Respondent,*v. Wenatchee Police Guild et al., *Appellants.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for Chelan County, Nos. 01-2-01054-3 and 02-2-00227-1, John E. Bridges, J., entered August 2, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Schultheis and Brown, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief
financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the
information contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jane ToddJane Todd Principal Financial Officer




Date: April 15, 2005



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

Calendar No. 153

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 825

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 20, 2003

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7401 West 100th Place in Bridgeview, 

Illinois, as the ‘‘Michael J. Healy Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 7401 West 100th Place in Bridgeview, Illinois, 

6 and known as the Moraine Valley Post Office, shall be 

7 known and designated as the ‘‘Michael J. Healy Post Of8 fice Building’’. 
2

•HR 825 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Michael J. Healy Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 153

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 825

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States 

Postal Service located at 7401 West 100th Place in Bridgeview, Illinois, as the ‘‘Michael J. Healy Post Office Building’’. 

JUNE 20, 2003

Reported without amendment
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of PetroChina Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the periodending December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhou Jiping, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: April 29, 2015
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. John F. O’NEILL, Defendant.

Cr. No. 44860.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

April 8, 1957.

Jerome H. Doran, Mineóla, N. Y., for defendant.

Leonard P. Moore, U. S. Atty., Joseph Soviero, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., in opposition.

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

An information, containing three counts, was filed' against the defendant on February 27, 1957, charging him with wilfully and knowingly attempting to evade the payment of a part of his income tax for each of the years 1950, 1951 and 1952.

The defendant has moved under Rule 7(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. for a bill of particulars. Although the information filed herein meets the requirements of Rule 7(c) it lacks the particularity necessary to enable the defendant to properly prepare his defense. It was just such a condition which Rule 7(f) was designed to remedy.

The items concerning which information is sought are twelve in number. After appropriate consideration of the arguments advanced for and against the application, it is my opinion that the defendant is entitled to the following relief :

(1) a statement as to whether the Government intends to rely upon the “net worth” theory; if so, what it will claim was the defendant’s net worth as of the beginning and the end of each of the three years involved.

(2) a statement as to whether the Government intends to rely upon the “specific items” theory; if so, and the number of such items is not large, the dates when they were received and the amounts thereof; if numerous, the gen*181eral nature, character and source thereof.

(3) a statement as to whether the Government will claim that the defendant made improper deductions from his gross income in calculating his taxable income; if so, and the number thereof is small, a list thereof; if numerous, a statement of the nature and character thereof. See Singer v. U. S., 3 Cir., 58 F.2d 74.

Save as hereinabove granted, the motion is denied for the reasons, among others, that the items in question (a) are included in or ascertainable from those granted, or (b) seek Government evidence.

Settle order on notice.
#### Adele R. Lederer, Plaintiff, *v.*George W. Lederer, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

June, 1905.)

Contempt — Procedure — Service of order to show cause — Sufficient upon attorney of party charged — Attorney and client — Extent of attorney’s authority — On appeal from interlocutory judgment.

An order to show cause in proceedings to punish a contempt of court may be served on the attorney for the defendant charged with the offense.'

An attorney authorized to act for the defendant in an appeal from an interlocutory judgment and who has been his attorney in the action is the defendant’s attorney for all. the purposes of the action.

*472Motion to vacate an order to show cause.

H. A. & C. E. Heydt, for motion.

. Henry Siegrist, Jr., appearing specially for defendant on motion, opposed.

Blanchard, J.

I have considered the opinion rendered by Mr. Justice Clarke in denying the motion to vacate the order to show cause and concur in the views there expressed. Moreover, I am of the opinion that since the Code of Civil Procedure makes no specific provision as to the method in which the order to show cause shall be served, the usual method of service of papers upon an attorney in an action should prevail. This view seems to be fortified by the terms of section 2273 of the Code, which provides that the order to show cause in contempt proceedings is equivalent to a notice of motion. There can be no question that a notice of motion to the same effect as this order to show cause would have been properly served upon the defendant’s attorney. The affidavit of the defendant’s attorney that he' has no general authority to act for the defendant in this action outside of the appeal from the interlocutory judgment now pending should not be considered. Having been the attorney for the defendant in the action he is such attorney for all the purposes of the action. His authority as such attorney cannot be limited by his client nor by himself. He is either the defendant’s attorney or he is not. If he is not he should apply to the court for leave to withdraw as the defendant’s attorney. Galt v. Provident Sav. Bank, 18 Abb. N. C. 431. The motion tb vacate the order to show cause is denied. Let the motion upon the order to show cause be restored to the calendar for the sixteenth inst. so that it may be disposed of on the merits.

Ordered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10Q
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,879
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      313
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,721
<PP&E>                                           1,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                     823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           186
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,601
<SALES>                                            171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   366
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,125)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.



By:

/s/ Robert L. Howard-AndersonName:

Robert L. Howard-AndersonTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Occam Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# laucnty92

&8Page &P of &N
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bruce  Caldwell,  certify to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of ESSXsport Corp. a Nevada corporation, on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly  period ended November 30, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that  information  contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ESSXsport
Corp.

The  undersigned  further  certifies that all previous  filings are accurate and
fairly represent the company's financial picture and fully comply.

By: /s/ Bruce Caldwell
    ---------------------------------
Name:  Bruce Caldwell
Title: President, CEO, and CFO
# Fatal contact SOC 49304, 2018

Fatal occupational injuries due to contact with objects or equipment to Heavy Vehicle and Mobile Equip. Service Technicians and Mechanics (SOC 49304), 2018 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries due to contact with objects or equipment to Heavy Vehicle and Mobile Equip. Service Technicians and Mechanics (SOC 49304), 2018		

Fatal occupational injuries due to contact with objects or equipment to Heavy Vehicle and Mobile Equip. Service Technicians and Mechanics (SOC 49304), 2018 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries due to contact with objects or equipment to Heavy Vehicle and Mobile Equip. Service Technicians and Mechanics (SOC 49304), 2018		

Page &P