alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 659

To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act regarding the 

requirements for mortgage insurance under such Act for hospitals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2003

Mr. NEY (for himself, Ms. WATERS, and Mr. BAKER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act regarding 

the requirements for mortgage insurance under such Act 

for hospitals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hospital Mortgage In5 surance Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STANDARDS FOR DETERMINING NEED AND FEASI7 BILITY FOR HOSPITALS. 

8 Paragraph (4) of section 242(d) of the National 

9 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z–7) is amended to read as 

10 follows: 
2

•HR 659 IH 

1 ‘‘(4)(A) The Secretary shall require satisfactory evi2 dence that the hospital will be located in a State or polit3 ical subdivision of a State with reasonable minimum 

4 standards of licensure and methods of operation for hos5 pitals and satisfactory assurance that such standards will 

6 be applied and enforced with respect to the hospital. 

7 ‘‘(B) The Secretary shall establish the means for de8 termining need and feasibility for the hospital. If the State 

9 has an official procedure for determining need for hos10 pitals, the Secretary shall also require that such procedure 

11 be followed before the application for insurance is sub12 mitted, and the application shall document that need has 

13 also been established under that procedure.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)

I, Jay
Stein, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Stein Mart, Inc.;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                          
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 6, 2012 |  | /s/ Jay Stein                                            
|                   |  | Jay Stein                                                
|                   |  | Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7348
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID CARL THOMPSON, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:03-cr-00477-NCT-1; 1:06-cv-00725-NCT) Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 26, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Carl Thompson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: David Carl Thompson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thompson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Thompson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to China
Healthcare Acquisition Corp., including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in China Healthcare Acquisition
Corp.s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s most recent fiscal year that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s internal control over financial
reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect China
Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a
significant role in China Healthcare Acquisition
Corp.s internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2008
    /s/ Alwin TanAlwin Tan, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36482-36483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17500]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1270-001]


Chula Vista Energy Center, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

July 16, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Chula Vista Energy Center, LLC's application

[[Page 36483]]

for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, 
noting that such application includes a request for blanket 
authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities 
and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 27, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St.. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a5c5f485955747673747f496f6a6a75686e5a7c7f6879347d756c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1a7a4b3a2ae8f8d888f84b29491918e9395a187849382cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>. or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17500 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Index

# Table 4.1

# Table 4.2

# Table 4.3

# Table 4.4
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FocusEnhancements, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period endedJune 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Brett Moyer, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/Brett A. Moyer       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Brett A. Moyer          |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| August 17, 2005    |

 

*The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  A signed original of this written statementor other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to FocusEnhancements, Inc. and such statement will be retained by FocusEnhancements, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.*

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, William Whittle, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Big Bear Gold Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Big Bear Gold Corporation for the year ended February 28, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Big Bear Gold Corporation.

Dated: June 24, 2004

/s/ William Whittle	William Whittle, Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Big Bear Gold Corporation and will be retained by Big Bear Gold Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
#### INSLEY v. GARSIDE et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 29, 1903.)

No. 829.

Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and Modifying Decree.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a rehearing is denied, but it is ordered that the concluding portion of the decree of this court (121 Fed. 699) be modified to read as follows: “On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the said District Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded to the said District Court for further proceedings, and with instructions to give effect to the proof of the appellees as a claim proven in the name of Caroline Sharick; the appellees to be subrogated to her rights thereunder only upon proof of their payment to her of the sum payable thereon out of the bankrupt estate.”
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 21

- 00058

- CV

DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, L.P. ; Bexar County Emergency Service District No. 5; and Bexar County Emergency Service District No. 10, Appellants

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 26125

Honorable Aaron Haas , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE RIOS

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the opinion and judgment issued by

this court on May 18 , 2022, are WITHDRAWN. T he judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. Costs are assessed against appellants.

SIGNED September 21 , 2022.

_____________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RDC International,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB for the period  ending  September  30,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
Cella,  Chief  Financial  Officer (or the  equivalent  thereof) of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Anthony Cella
-------------------------
Anthony Cella
Chief Financial Officer (or the equivalent thereof)
Februar 24, 2003
# msd_CD_R1_00

# image1.png
EX-10.46.2



 Exhibit 10.46.2 

 

			
	



	 	  


 Reference is made to (i) that certain master repurchase agreement dated as of February 27, 2013
(the “MRA”), between The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, as buyer (“Buyer”) and Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., as seller (“Seller”) and (ii) that certain pricing side letter dated as of February 27, 2013 (the
“Pricing Letter”), between the Buyer and the Seller. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the MRA or the Pricing Letter, as applicable. 

The Seller hereby requests that the Buyer waive, and the Buyer does hereby waive (i) from and after November 1, 2012 through
and including March 8, 2013, compliance by the Seller with the following financial covenants: 
  

	 	•	 	 Section 13(mm)(ii) of the MRA (Maintenance of Adjustable Tangible Net Worth) 



 

	 	•	 	 Section 13(mm)(iii) of the MRA (Maintenance of Leverage) 



The Seller hereby also requests that Buyer waive, and the Buyer hereby does waive, from and after November 1, 2012 through and
including March 31, 2013, compliance by the Seller with the following financial covenants: 
  

	 	•	 	 Section 13(mm)(iv) of the MRA (Minimum Net Income) 



 

			
	Sincerely,
	
	Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	  

	Title:	 	  

	
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
	The Royal Bank of Scotland plc
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	  

	Title:	 	  


  

					
		 	 Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.

2727 Spring Creek Drive—Spring, TX 77373
 NMLS ID #1077636
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1


                              SUNPHARM CORPORATION
                          CALCULATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)


FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:

                   # Days
Total Shares     Outstanding
------------     -----------
3,708,879    x         87       =    322,672,473
5,537,165    x          3       =     16,611,495
                 ---------            -----------
                       90             339,283,968    DIVIDED BY 90 = 3,769,822


FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1996

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:


                      # Days
Total Shares        Outstanding
------------        -----------
2,884,535      x         91       =    262,492,685    DIVIDED BY 91 = 2,884,535








                                      -13-
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simula, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley P. Forst,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                        
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company for the periods presented.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Bradley P. Forst   
| |                        
| | Bradley P. Forst       
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | August 14, 2003
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief
executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the
information contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John CaldwellJohn Caldwell President and Chief Executive Officer




Date: April 15, 2005



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### COBURN et al. v. WARNER et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Nov. 19, 1951.

Lucian Tharaud, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Unterberg & Unterberg, New York City, for defendants.

DIMOCK, District Judge. .

This motion is one made by the plaintiff B. Melba Coburn to vacate a notice of examination to take place in New York, N. Y. served by the defendant Lillian Futerman, or for a direction that the examination be held as written interrogatories or that it be held in Boston. Affidavits submitted in support of the motion indicate that this *189plaintiff has an elderly brother and sister who are dependent on her, that she resides in Dracut, Massachusetts, about 35 miles from Boston with her brother and sister, that her presence in the home at night is needed in order to care for the brother and sister who are not well, that continued absence from her work would jeopardize her employment and that the plaintiff and her brother and sister are without financial resources.

Plaintiff attended at the trial of a severed issue in this case in New York and took the witness stand before it was settled. Counsel for defendant Futerman permitted her to return to Massachusetts without requiring an examination at that time.

 It is true that plaintiff sought this forum but there is no inflexible rule that a plaintiff should submit to examination at the forum chosen. Ginsberg v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., D.C., 6 F.R.D. 371. Under the circumstances of this case plaintiff should not be required to come to New York for examination. Defendant Futerman may proceed at her election to examine plaintiff either by written interrogatories or in Boston, Massachusetts, orally.

Settle order on notice.