alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5245

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 9, 2004

Received 

AN ACT

To extend the liability indemnification regime for the 

commercial space transportation industry.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 5245 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. INDEMNIFICATION EXTENSION. 

2 Section 70113(f) of title 49, United States Code, is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2004.’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘December 31, 2009.’’. 

5 SEC. 2. STUDY. 

6 Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment 

7 of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall enter 

8 into an arrangement with a nonprofit entity for the con9 duct of an independent comprehensive study of the liabil10 ity risk sharing regime in the United States for commer11 cial space transportation under section 70113 of title 49, 

12 United States Code. To ensure that Congress has a full 

13 analysis of the liability risk sharing regime, the study shall 

14 assess methods by which the current system could be 

15 eliminated, including an estimate of the time required to 

16 implement each of the methods assessed. The study shall 

17 assess whether any alternative steps would be needed to 

18 maintain a viable and competitive United States space 

19 transportation industry if the current regime were elimi20 nated. In conducting the assessment under this section, 

21 input from commercial space transportation insurance ex22 perts shall be sought. The study also shall examine liabil23 ity risk sharing in other nations with commercial launch 

24 capability and evaluate the direct and indirect impact that 

25 ending this regime would have on the competitiveness of 

26 the United States commercial space launch industry in re-
3

HR 5245 RDS 

1 lation to foreign commercial launch providers and on 

2 United States assured access to space.

Passed the House of Representatives October 8, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Boardof Directors 

Microtune, Inc.: 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Form S-8 No’s. 333-120091, 333-144882, 333-150537, 333-154834 and 333-158827) of Microtune, Inc. of our reports dated February 16, 2010, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Microtune, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Microtune, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

February 16, 2010
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Cortez FOREMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7404.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.

Ronald Cortez Foreman, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Cortez Foreman appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 750 to the crack cocaine Sentencing Guidelines. We review the district court’s decision for abuse of discretion; however, “[w]e review de novo ... a court’s conclusion on the scope of its legal authority under *306§ 3582(c)(2).” *United States v. Munn,*595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir.2010). As the district court properly found, Foreman was sentenced pursuant to the statutory mandatory minimum term of imprisonment and therefore is not eligible for a reduction via § 3582(c)(2). *See id.*at 187 (“[A] defendant who was convicted of a crack offense but sentenced pursuant to a mandatory statutory minimum sentence is ineligible for a reduction under § 3582(c)(2).”) (citing *United States v. Hood,*556 F.3d 226, 235-36 (4th Cir.2009)). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.*
      *United States v. Foreman,*No. 2:08-cr-00131-RBS-FBS-l (E.D.Va. July 27, 2012).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

We note that the district court placed its reasons under seal.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

May 1, 2013

s0424

Order 

May 1, 2013

146340

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146340

COA: 309540

Wayne CC: 11-008326-FH

SHAKEISHA NICHOLE HALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 22, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT
31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002   I, James J. Volk,
Chief Financial Officer of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel Operating Company,
certify that:  1.I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel
Operating Company;  2.Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)     Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;  b)    Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  c)     Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)     All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and  
   b)    Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  February 17, 2004UBIQUITEL INC./s/ James J. VolkJames J. VolkChief Financial OfficerUBIQUITEL OPERATING COMPANY/s/ James J. VolkJames J. VolkChief Financial Officer  2
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5362

To ensure that a former Federal building in Shreveport, Louisiana, is no 

longer known as the ‘‘Joe Waggoner Federal Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2004

Mr. MCCRERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To ensure that a former Federal building in Shreveport, 

Louisiana, is no longer known as the ‘‘Joe Waggoner 

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEDESIGNATION. 

4 The former Federal Building located at 500 Fannin 

5 Street in Shreveport, Louisiana, designated on October 

6 28, 1978, by Public Law 95–545, as the ‘‘Joe Waggoner 

7 Federal Building’’ shall no longer be known as the ‘‘Joe 

8 Waggoner Federal Building’’. 
2

•HR 5362 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the former 

4 Federal Building referred to in section 1 shall not be 

5 deemed to be a reference to a Federal building.

Æ
**Exhibit 15.5**

April 27, 2017 

Securitiesand Exchange Commission 

Washington, D.C. 20549 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

We werepreviously principal accountants for PetroChina Company Limited and under the date of April 28, 2016, we reported on the consolidated financial statements of PetroChina Company Limited as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. On September 9, 2016, we resigned. 

We have read PetroChina Company Limited’s statements included under Item 16F of its Form 20-Fdated April 27, 2017, and we agree with such statements, except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with PetroChina Company Limited’s statement that the change in principal accountant was approved by the audit committee ofthe board of directors. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ KPMG 

Hong Kong, China
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 165
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 8

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2003

                    Received and read the first time

                             June 20, 2003

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
            To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Death Tax Repeal Permanency Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. ESTATE TAX REPEAL MADE PERMANENT.

    Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation 
Act of 2001 shall not apply to title V of such Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 18, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                            By Martha C. Morrison,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 165

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H. R. 8

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

            To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 20, 2003

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William McGinty, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Global Innovative Systems, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Global Innovative Systems, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:
5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 23, 2003

/s/ William McGintyWilliam McGinty
President, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-31176 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TROY WATTS, also known as T-Dove, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CR-145-16-L

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Troy Watts appeals his 48-month sentence following the revocation of his supervised release term relating to Watts’s 1997 guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Citing United States v. Doggett , 230 F.3d 160, 164-65 (5th Cir. 2000), and for the first time on appeal, Watts contends that his revocation sentence was unlawfully imposed. Specifically, Watts asserts that, because his superseding indictment failed to allege a specific drug quantity, his underlying drug conspiracyNo. 03-31176 -2- conviction carried a 20-year maximum sentence pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C), thereby rendering it a Class C felony under 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(3). Watts maintains that his revocation sentence could not exceed two years pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Watts secondarily argues that, assuming his case is remanded for resentencing, any additionally imposed supervised release term would result in an ex post facto violation. Watts neither directly appealed from, nor sought collateral review of, his underlying conviction and sentence. He may not do so on appeal from the revocation of supervised release. See United States v. Moody , 277 F.3d 719, 720-21 (5th Cir. 2001).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2
**Section 1350 Certification**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Slippery Rock Financial Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Mark A. Volponi, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
/s/ Mark A. Volponi
Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2004
[No. 55178-7-I.

Division One.

November 21, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Rolando Lincoln Clizbe, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Whatcom County, No. 03-1-00214-6, Steven J. Mura, J., entered November 1, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11 - Earnings per share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  1999                 1998
                                                              -------------        -------------
<S>                                                           <C>                  <C>           
Net income (loss)                                             $     217,951        $    (141,895)
Less dividends on preferred stock                                    (3,529)              (4,071)
                                                              -------------        -------------

Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders           $     214,422        $    (145,966)
                                                              =============        =============

Weighted average common shares outstanding                        3,004,659            2,147,863
Dilutive Potential Common Shares-Options                             73,700                    0

Net income (loss) per common share
     Basic                                                    $        0.07        $       (0.07)
     Diluted                                                  $        0.07        $       (0.07)
</TABLE>
|Exhibit 13.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report
of Havas (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jacques Hérail, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


(1)
                The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the           Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operation of the Company.


Date: May 28, 2004
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Jacques Hérail
      
      Jacques Hérail
      Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|
Exhibit 32.3




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:




1) the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended January 1, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2) the information contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended January 1, 2012 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Alex WalkerAlex WalkerInterim Chief Financial Officer




Date:
April 30, 2012




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
PGEM - EX10.23 - 2012.12.31 - 10K


Exhibit 10.23


December 17, 2012
John Buckley
1305 NW 47th Street
Kansas City, MO  64116


Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear John:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated December 31, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2013.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgement and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.


	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ John Buckley
	 

	John Buckley