alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,927
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              22
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                16,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,925
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,609
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,703
<LOANS>                                        160,268
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,401
<DEPOSITS>                                     187,866
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,020
<LONG-TERM>                                        545
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 213,401
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,622
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  939
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   518
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,079
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,204
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,846
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      206
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,402
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,402
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,361
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.32
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,574
<LOANS-PAST>                                        79
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,299
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      135
<RECOVERIES>                                        38
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,408
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,408
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            803
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7745

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DESMOND WARD, a/k/a David A. King,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CR-96-29; CA-00-257-3-1-MU)

Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 18, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Howard Rosen, Miami, Florida, for Appellant. Frank DeArmon

Whitney, United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Desmond Ward seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Ward has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Table 8. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population 25 to 64 years of age by educational 

attainment and sex, 2009 annual averages 

(Numbers in thousands)

 Civilian labor force 

 Employed Unemployed 

 Total 

Percent 

of 

population 

 Total 

 Percent 

of labor 

force 

Total

Total, 25 to 64 years........................... 160,235 126,247 78.8 116,163 72.5 10,084 8.0 33,988

 Less than a high school diploma......... 18,023 11,401 63.3 9,687 53.7 1,714 15.0 6,622

 High school graduates, no college...... 47,718 36,159 75.8 32,591 68.3 3,568 9.9 11,559

 Some college or associate's degree... 43,955 35,291 80.3 32,480 73.9 2,811 8.0 8,665

 College graduates, total................... 50,539 43,397 85.9 41,406 81.9 1,991 4.6 7,143

 Bachelor's degree........................... 33,301 28,350 85.1 26,877 80.7 1,472 5.2 4,951

 Master's degree............................ 12,559 10,823 86.2 10,406 82.9 417 3.9 1,736

 Professional degree........................ 2,658 2,403 90.4 2,347 88.3 56 2.3 256

 Doctoral degree.............................. 2,021 1,821 90.1 1,776 87.9 46 2.5 200

Women

Total, 25 to 64 years......................... 81,440 58,787 72.2 54,689 67.2 4,099 7.0 22,653

 Less than a high school diploma......... 8,409 4,118 49.0 3,512 41.8 605 14.7 4,291

 High school graduates, no college...... 23,174 15,711 67.8 14,427 62.3 1,284 8.2 7,463

 Some college or associate's degree... 23,646 17,804 75.3 16,532 69.9 1,272 7.1 5,842

 College graduates, total..................... 26,212 21,154 80.7 20,217 77.1 937 4.4 5,057

Bachelor's degree......................... 17,417 13,867 79.6 13,165 75.6 702 5.1 3,550

Educational attainment and sex

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

Not 

in 

labor 

force 

 Total 

Percent 

of 

population 

 Bachelor s degree......................... 17,417 13,867 79.6 13,165 75.6 702 5.1 3,550

 Master's degree............................ 6,900 5,659 82.0 5,472 79.3 187 3.3 1,241

 Professional degree........................ 1,086 926 85.3 897 82.6 30 3.2 159

 Doctoral degree.............................. 809 702 86.8 684 84.5 18 2.6 107

Men

Total, 25 to 64 years........................... 78,795 67,460 85.6 61,474 78.0 5,986 8.9 11,335

 Less than a high school diploma......... 9,614 7,283 75.8 6,175 64.2 1,108 15.2 2,331

 High school graduates, no college...... 24,544 20,447 83.3 18,164 74.0 2,284 11.2 4,096

 Some college or associate's degree... 20,309 17,487 86.1 15,947 78.5 1,539 8.8 2,823

 College graduates, total..................... 24,328 22,242 91.4 21,189 87.1 1,054 4.7 2,085

 Bachelor's degree......................... 15,884 14,483 91.2 13,713 86.3 771 5.3 1,401

 Master's degree.............................. 5,659 5,164 91.3 4,934 87.2 230 4.5 495

 Professional degree....................... 1,573 1,476 93.9 1,450 92.2 26 1.8 97

 Doctoral degree.............................. 1,212 1,119 92.3 1,092 90.1 27 2.4 93

 SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

21
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-23-00039-CR 

 

CHARLES CLINTON AARS, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 22nd District Court 

Comal County, Texas 

Trial Court No. CR2021-150, Honorable Bruce Boyer, Presiding 

June 5, 2023 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant, Charles Clinton Aars, appeals his conviction by jury of the offense of 

aggravated assault with a deadly weapon1 and sentence of two years of confinement.2

Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. As 

required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), the motion to dismiss is signed by 

1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a)(2).

2 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
2

appellant and his attorney. As no decision of the Court has been delivered, the motion is 

granted, and the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and 

our mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 32.2



In connection with the Annual Report of Microtune, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rob-Roy J. Graham, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/    ROB-ROY J.
GRAHAM
|Rob-Roy J. Graham       
|Chief Financial Officer 
|Microtune, Inc.         



March
15, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ARTIS CARNEL CARROLL, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 32 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2023, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Syndication, Inc. (the
        "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
        Mrutyunjaya S. Chittavajhula., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
        certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  *Dated:*May 2, 2008
              *By:*
              */s/
                  Mrutyunjaya S. Chittavajhula.**Mrutyunjaya
                  S. Chittavajhula.**Chief
                  Financial Officer*
#### The Atlantic Contracting Co. *v.*The Grange Land Co.

Atkinson, J. — There is nothing in this case to take it out of the long established rule, that this court will not control the discretion of the trial judge in granting a first new trial in a cáse where the evidence is conflicting and he is dissatisfied with the verdict rendered.

February 5,1895.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*567Action of trespass. Before Judge MacDonell. City court of Savannah. May term, 1894.

Lester & Ravenel and Gig-nilliat & Stubbs, for plaintiff in error. E. S. Elliott and W. L. Clay, *contra.*
#### In re GAFFNEY.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

May 5, 1903.)

No. 35

Original. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Frank P. Blair, for petitioner. John S. Dean, for respondent.

Dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, on motion of the petitioner.
**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

 

  I, **Nicholas Kaiser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form N-CSR/A for the period ended November 30, 2007 (the “Report”).

 I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

  Date: April 2, 2008  /s/ *Nicholas Kaiser*  President 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

  I, **Christopher Fankhauser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form N-CSR/A for the period ended November 30, 2007 (the “Report”).

I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

Date: April 2, 2008

/s/ *Christopher Fankhauser*Treasurer
# 2018 Violence in hospitals
Exhibit
      32.1








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**(Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William H.
      Armstrong III, as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      9, 2007








/s/
        William H. Armstrong III


William
      H. Armstrong III


Chairman
      of the Board, President and


Chief
      Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### CIMIOTTI UNHAIRING CO. v. NEARSEAL UNHAIRING CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 23, 1903.)

No. 169.

I. Patents—Suit for Infringement—Review on Second Appear.

Where the questions presented on an appeal from a final decree finding infringement of a patent do not differ in any material respect from those determined adversely to the appellant on a former appeal from an interlocutory order granting a preliminary injunction, and the membership of the court has changed in the meantime, such questions will not be again reviewed.

¶ 1. Previous adjudications as to validity and construction of patents, effect in Circuit Court of Appeals, see notes to National Cash Register Co. v. American Cash Register Co., 3 C. C. A. 565; Electric Co. v. Railway Co., 27 C. C. A. 427; Emigration Co. v. Gallegos, 32 C. C. A. 475.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New York.

For prior report, see 118 Fed. 1021.

W. B. Greely, for appellant.

W. A. Redding and R. C. Raegener, for appellee.

Before WARRACE, TOWNSEND, and COXE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record shows that this case as now presented upon an appeal from a final decree awarding an injunction does not differ in any particulars favorable to the appellant from the case as it was presented to this court upon an appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction. 115 Fed. 507, 53 C. C. A. 161. All the questions involved having been previously determined by this court adversely to the appellant, we think it would be unseemly to review them when the court is constituted by different judges, and that the decree should be affirmed upon the authority of that decision.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended May 2, 2009 of Stein Mart, Inc. (the Form 10-Q), I, James G. Delfs, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                                           
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 10, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ James G. Delfs                                        
|                    |  |  |  | James G. Delfs                                            
|                    |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
^!N^h^ *"** ^^ ^s

w^ uy^ c^ft^A-s t^vW^ <&^ ^>AA&A

^uACv* _ A—J

BEOBVED IN

OCT 1^ 201*5

\^y\o
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**KAZIMIR CRAIG GROHOWSKI,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 204 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 26th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.4

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Mark P. Colonnese, certify that:

      (1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of AtheroGenics, Inc.; and

      (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this report.

Date: April 5, 2005

                              /s/ MARK P. COLONNESE
                              ----------------------------------------------
                              Name: Mark P. Colonnese
                              Title: Senior Vice President, Finance and
                                     Administration and Chief Financial Officer

                                       11
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, August 20, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7979.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Issue Committee will be held Thursday, August 20, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Sallie Chavez. For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: July 16, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director,  Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-17476 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Subjex Corporation does hereby certifythat:
 
 (a) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Subjex
Corporation for the yearended December 31,
2006(the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects,the financial
conditionand results of operations of
Subjex Corporation
 
 Date:
      April 15, 2008
              By:
              /s/  Andrew
      D. HyderAndrewD.HyderPresident& Chief Executive
    Officer