alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 12(a).1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     PetroChina Company Limited (the "Company") is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report").

     I, Ma Fucai, Chairman of the board of directors of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the
U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE:

     (i)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





Date: June 25, 2003                       /s/ MA FUCAI
                                          ------------------------
                                          Chairman (performing the functions of
                                          Chief Executive Officer)



<PAGE>


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     PetroChina Company Limited (the "Company") is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report").

     I, Wang Guoliang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE:

     (iii)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (iv)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.





Date: June 25, 2003                            /s/ WANG GUOLIANG
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Chief Financial Officer
# 17QRTL1_00

# image1.png
# page 1
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AND AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”), effective as of March 13, 2013 (the “Effective Date”) is made
by and among Tower Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “TGI”), Tower Group International, Ltd. (“TGIL”), a Bermuda company, and William E. Hitselberger (the “Executive”). 

WITNESSETH THAT 

WHEREAS, the Executive and TGI are the parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2009 (the
“Employment Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Executive and TGI wish to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth below;

 WHEREAS, on the Effective Date, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 30, 2012, among TGI,
Canopius Holdings Bermuda Limited and certain other parties, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to such Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 8, 2012, TGI became an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of TGIL; and 

WHEREAS, TGI desires to assign and TGIL desires to assume all of TGI’s obligations under the Employment Agreement; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, TGI, TGIL and the Executive hereby agree as
follows: 
 1. The definition of the “Company” in the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to mean “Tower Group
International, Ltd.” 
 2. Section 4(g)(iii) of the Employment Agreement is amended by replacing the words “the
Company” with “Tower Group, Inc.” 
 3. TGI hereby irrevocably, absolutely and unconditionally assigns,
transfers, conveys and delivers to TGIL and its successors and permitted assigns forever all of TGI’s right, title and interest of every kind, nature and description in, to and under the Employment Agreement. 

4. TGIL hereby accepts the assignment, transfer, conveyance and delivery of the Employment Agreement. 

5. TGIL hereby irrevocably, absolutely and unconditionally assumes, undertakes and agrees to pay, perform and discharge in full, and
release and discharge TGI and its affiliates, successors and assigns from, any and all obligations thereof under the Employment Agreement. 
 6. Except as expressly amended above, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has caused this Agreement to be duly
executed on its behalf as of the date hereof. 
  

			
	TOWER GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	 Elliot S. Orol

		
	Title:	 	 SVP, General Counsel and Secretary

	
	TOWER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
		
	By:	 	 Elliot S. Orol

		
	Title:	 	 SVP, General Counsel and Secretary

	
	WILLIAM E. HITSELBERGER
	
	 /s/ William E. Hitselberger
EXHIBIT 23.02





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-120096) of Shopping.com Ltd. of our report dated March 22, 2004, except for note 16 as to which the date is
September 21, 2004, relating to the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002, which appears in this Form 10-K.





|                 |  |                                      
|---------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Tel Aviv, Israel |  | Kesselman & Kesselman                
|March 21, 2005   |  | Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
Exhibit 10.3


 


SECURED REVOLVING NOTE


 


(EXECUTED AND DELIVERED IN ____________________)


 


	$750,000	Maturity Date:  September 8, 2013


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, UNIFED PAYMENTS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company (“Borrower”) hereby promises to pay to the order of NET ELEMNENT INTERNATIONAL
INC. or the holder (the “Lender”) of this Secured Revolving Note (this “Revolving Note”) at 1450 S. Miami
Avenue, Miami, Florida or such other place of payment as the holder of this Revolving Note may specify from time to time in writing,
in lawful money of the United States of America, the principal amount of SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($750,000) or such
other principal amount as Lender has advanced to Borrower, together with interest at a rate as specified in the Loan Agreement
(defined hereafter).


 


This Revolving Note is the Revolving Note
referred to in, and is executed and delivered in connection with, that certain Loan Agreement dated as of March 8, 2013, by and
between Lender, Borrower and certain Guarantors thereunder (as the same may from time to time be amended, modified or supplemented
in accordance with its terms, the “Loan Agreement”), and is entitled to the benefit and security of the Loan Agreement
and the other Loan Documents (as defined in the Loan Agreement), to which reference is made for a statement of all of the terms
and conditions thereof. All payments shall be made in accordance with the Loan Agreement. All terms defined in the Loan Agreement
shall have the same definitions when used herein, unless otherwise defined herein. An Event of Default under the Loan Agreement
shall constitute a default under this Revolving Note.


 


Borrower waives presentment and demand
for payment, notice of dishonor, protest and notice of protest under the UCC or any applicable law. Borrower agrees to make all
payments under this Revolving Note without setoff, recoupment or deduction and regardless of any counterclaim or defense. This
Revolving Note has been negotiated and delivered to Lender and is payable in the State of Florida. This Revolving Note shall be
governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, excluding any conflicts of law rules
or principles that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.


 





	BORROWER FOR ITSELF	Unified Payments, LLC
	 	 
	 	By: 	
	 	Name:
	 	Title:
22

Table 8. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population 25 to 64 years of age by educational 

 attainment and sex, 2005 annual averages 

(Numbers in thousands)

 Civilian labor force 

 Employed Unemployed 

 Total Percent of 

population Total 

 Percent 

of labor 

force 

Total

Total, 25 to 64 years.............................. 154,340 121,752 78.9 116,866 75.7 4,886 4.0 32,588

 Less than a high school diploma............ 18,883 11,893 63.0 10,965 58.1 928 7.8 6,990

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 47,669 36,432 76.4 34,688 72.8 1,744 4.8 11,236

 Some college or associate degree......... 41,581 33,808 81.3 32,507 78.2 1,300 3.8 7,773

 College graduates, total........................ 46,207 39,619 85.7 38,705 83.8 914 2.3 6,589

 Bachelor's degree........................... 30,500 25,880 84.9 25,219 82.7 661 2.6 4,619

 Master's degree.............................. 11,218 9,679 86.3 9,480 84.5 199 2.1 1,539

 Professional degree........................ 2,507 2,242 89.4 2,216 88.4 25 1.1 266

 Doctoral degree.............................. 1,983 1,818 91.7 1,789 90.2 29 1.6 165

Women

Total, 25 to 64 years.............................. 78,630 56,322 71.6 53,951 68.6 2,371 4.2 22,308

 Less than a high school diploma............ 8,956 4,364 48.7 3,926 43.8 438 10.0 4,592

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 23,768 16,191 68.1 15,392 64.8 799 4.9 7,577

 Some college or associate degree......... 22,444 17,018 75.8 16,331 72.8 687 4.0 5,426

 College graduates, total..................... 23,461 18,748 79.9 18,302 78.0 446 2.4 4,713

 Bachelor's degree........................... 15,769 12,360 78.4 12,048 76.4 312 2.5 3,408

 Master's degree.............................. 6,019 4,972 82.6 4,868 80.9 104 2.1 1,047

 Professional degree........................ 969 803 82.8 787 81.2 16 1.9 167

 Doctoral degree.............................. 705 613 87.0 599 85.0 14 2.3 91

Men

Total, 25 to 64 years........................... 75,710 65,430 86.4 62,915 83.1 2,515 3.8 10,280

 Less than a high school diploma.......... 9,927 7,529 75.8 7,039 70.9 490 6.5 2,398

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 23,900 20,241 84.7 19,296 80.7 945 4.7 3,659

 Some college or associate degree......... 19,137 16,790 87.7 16,176 84.5 613 3.7 2,347

 College graduates, total..................... 22,746 20,871 91.8 20,403 89.7 468 2.2 1,875

 Bachelor's degree............................. 14,731 13,520 91.8 13,171 89.4 349 2.6 1,211

 Master's degree.............................. 5,199 4,707 90.5 4,613 88.7 94 2.0 492

 Professional degree.......................... 1,538 1,439 93.6 1,430 92.9 10 0.7 99

 Doctoral degree.............................. 1,278 1,205 94.2 1,190 93.1 15 1.2 74

Educational attainment and sex

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

 Not in 

labor force Total Percent of 

population 

 1 Includes persons with a high school diploma or equivalent. SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor,

Bureau of Labor Statistics
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 550 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 550

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain ink-jet textile printing 
                               machinery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain ink-jet textile printing 
                               machinery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN INK-JET TEXTILE PRINTING MACHINERY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.01.92    Ink-jet textile   Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     printing                                                                31/2005          ''
                     machinery                                                                                 .
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     8443.51.10)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered December 18, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00133

- CV

GREGORY B. BATEN TRU ST, INTERVENOR, Appellant

V.

BRANCH BANKING AND T RUST COMPANY AND RIC HARD W. HEATH, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 13

- 08390



### O RDER

We DENY appellee Richard W. Heath’s December 17, 2014 request for additional time

for oral argument at submission, currently scheduled for January 6, 2015 at 11:00 am

.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.1 AMENDMENT1TO2011EquityIncentivePlan




Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NO. 1 to the 
MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS HOLDINGS LLC 
2011 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




WHEREAS, Momentive Performance Materials Holdings LLC. (the “Company”) maintains the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), for the benefit of eligible associates of the Company’s subsidiaries;  and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of reserved units available under the Plan; and


WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XIII of the Plan, the Plan may be modified or amended in any respect by the Compensation Committee with the prior approval of the Board of Managers and, by action dated March 4, 2013, the Executive Committee of the Board of Managers approved the following amendment to the Plan;


NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan be amended, effective as of the date written below, as follows:


		
	1.
	The definition of Reserved Units under Article II of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:




“Reserved Units” means, at any time, an aggregate of 20,800,000 Common Units, as the same may be adjusted at or prior to such time in accordance with Section 10.1.


2.    Except to the extent necessary to give effect to this Amendment, the Plan shall remain unchanged.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 4th day of March, 2013.









MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS HOLDINGS LLC.


By: /s/ William H. Carter___________
Title: Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

:

GOLDA HARRIS, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-2018 (MLC)

:

Plaintiff, : O P I N I O N

:

v. :

:

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, :

et al., :

:

Defendants. :

 :

THE COURT ordered the parties to show cause why the action

should not be remanded to state court for, inter alia, lack of

subject matter jurisdiction. (Dkt. entry no. 5, Order To Show

Cause.) The plaintiff pro se brought this action in New Jersey

state court. (Dkt. entry no. 1, Rmv. Not., Ex. A, Compl.) The

defendants removed the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331,

asserting that the plaintiff lists claims arising under federal

law. (See Rmv. Not. at 2-3.) The Complaint is poorly drafted,

but the plaintiff does state therein that “plaintiff is making no

federal or civil rights claims”. (Compl. at 8.) Thus, it

appeared that the Court may lack subject matter jurisdiction.

THE COURT thus issued the Order To Show Cause, and ordered

the plaintiff to state in her response whether her intention was

to assert claims pursuant to state law only. (Order To Show

Cause at 2.)

THE PLAINTIFF in her response states that she only seeks

relief, and makes claims, pursuant to state law. (See dkt. entry

Case 3:11-cv-02018-MLC-LHG Document 9 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 70
no. 8, Pl. Response at 2-3.) There is no need for a further

response from the defendants, as the plaintiff has now made her

intentions known. Therefore, the Court will (1) grant the Order

To Show Cause to the extent that it concerns remand for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction, (2) dismiss the Complaint insofar as

it may be construed to seek relief pursuant to federal law, and

(3) remand the action insofar as it seeks relief pursuant to

state law.

FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court will issue an appropriate

order and judgment.

 s/ Mary L. Cooper 

MARY L. COOPER

United States District Judge

Dated: May 23, 2011

2

Case 3:11-cv-02018-MLC-LHG Document 9 Filed 05/23/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 71
Exhibit 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer of Speaking Roses International, Inc., a Utah
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



By /s/ Blaine Harris
Blaine Harris
Chief Executive
Officer

May 23, 2005
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TIMOTHY HARTMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1385

[November 22, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Hon. Thomas J. 

Coleman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-6875CF10A. 

Timothy Hartman, Crestview, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7348

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID CARL THOMPSON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (1:03-cr-00477-NCT-1; 1:06-cv-00725-NCT)

Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 26, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Carl Thompson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

David Carl Thompson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thompson has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Thompson’s

motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 23

 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
Harleysville   Savings   Financial   Corporation   on  Form  S-3   (Registration
No.333-38970)  and Form S-8  (Registration  No.  333-38152)  of our report dated
October 27, 2000,  incorporated  by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Harleysville  Savings Financial  Corporation for the year ended September 30,
2000.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 21, 2000
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the filing by Rushmore  Financial  Group,  Inc. (the
"Company")  of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2003 (the  "Report"),  I, Randy  Rutledge,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

               1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
                    13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
               2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects,  the financial  condition and results
                    of operation of the Company.




                                                   /s/ Randy Rutledge
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Randy Rutledge
                                                   Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  May 15, 2003







                                       23