alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 17, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MOSES LOPEZ, JR. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00454

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# 17SNR08_00

# image1.png
EX-23.1 4 dex231.htm CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No’s. 333-47646, 333-55504, 333-74768, 333-120091 and333-130571) of Microtune, Inc. of our reports dated February 28, 2006, except for Note 2 as to which the date is January 22, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Microtune, Inc., Microtune, Inc. management’s assessmentof the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Microtune, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

January 22, 2007
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHNNY TIMOTHY DRIVER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Case No. 2D20-3099

September 15, 2021

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Anthony 

Rondolino, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender and Carol J. Y. Wilson, 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Blain Goff, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, ATKINSON, and STARGEL, JJ., Concur.
2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF Z. Z. E

- P., A

CHILD

,

Appellant

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 1

- 00 024

- C V

Appeal from the

65 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20 19DCM3417 )

O R D E R

On February 3, 2021 , Appellant filed notice of appeal in the above

- styled and numbered

cause. The notice of appeal is late, but it was filed within fifteen days after the deadline for the

notice of appeal to be filed. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied w hen an

appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by T EX .R.A PP .P.

26.1 but within the fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension

of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). However, an appellant must

still provide the Court with a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal before

the Court may accept the appeal. Accordingly, Appellant is ordered to respond in writing and

provide the Court with a reasonable explanation for filing the notice of appeal late. See

T EX .R.A PP .P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 26.3; Verburgt , 959 S.W.2d at 617. The explanation is due to be filed

no later than February 21 , 202 1

. This ord er previously issued to Appellant’s former counsel, but

the Court is reissuing the notice to ensure Appellant’s current counsel is aware of the situation.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 6 th d ay of February

, 20 2 1

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.

Alley, J., not participating
# 18SNR02_00

# image1.png
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 982 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 655
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 982

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 5, 2003

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

                             July 20, 2004

              Reported by Mr. Grassley, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations issued by 
                   the Government of American Samoa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TAX TREATMENT OF BONDS AND OTHER 
              OBLIGATIONS ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT OF AMERICAN SAMOA.

    (a) Exemption of All Bonds From Income Taxation by State and Local 
Governments.--Subsection (b) of section 202 of Public Law 98-454 (48 
U.S.C. 1670) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Exemption of All Bonds From Income Taxation by State and 
Local Governments.--
            ``(1) In general.--The interest on any bond or other 
        obligation issued by or on behalf of the Government of American 
        Samoa shall be exempt from taxation by the Government of 
        American Samoa and the governments of any of the several 
        States, the District of Columbia, any territory or possession 
        of the United States, and any subdivision thereof.
            ``(2) Exemption applicable only to income taxes.--The 
        exemption provided by paragraph (1) shall not apply to gift, 
        estate, inheritance, legacy, succession, or other wealth 
        transfer taxes.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall apply to obligations issued after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 4, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 655

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 982

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations issued by 
                   the Government of American Samoa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 20, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### REPUBLIC OF CHINA v. PANG-TSU MOW et al.

Civ. A. No. 4741-51.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

Dec. 14, 1951.

See also 101 F.Supp. 646.

Robert Patterson, New York City, William E. Leahy and William J. Hughes, Jr., Washington, D. C, for plaintiff.

Roberts & Mclnnis, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

KIRKLAND, Judge.

Upon consideration of the plaintiff’s motion to strike certain portions of the defendants’ notice of appeal filed December 12, 1951, and the points and authorities attached thereto, it appearing to the Court that notice of appeal divested the District Court of jurisdiction of the case and any further proceedings in the District Court are ineffective. The motion filed herein requests relief not specifically reserved to the District Court under the rules of civil procedure. See 3 Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice & Procedure, Section 1558.

Since this notice of appeal has been properly filed the jurisdiction to consider its merits lies in the appellate court, therefor it is by the Court this 14th day of December, 1951,

Ordered, that the plaintiff’s motion to strike certain portions of the defendants’ notice of appeal be and the same is hereby overruled.
# table14full09

&8Page &P of &N
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                          SIMULA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Three Months Ended June 30,           Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                    ------------------------------        ------------------------------
                                                       1997               1996                1997               1996
                                                    -----------        -----------        -----------        -----------

<S>                                                 <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>
Income (loss) before cumulative effect
     of a change in accounting principle            $    18,301        $  (305,428)       $  (547,836)       $  (183,496)

Cumulative effect on prior years (to
     December 31, 1995) of changing
     accounting for pre-contract costs                                                                        (3,239,948)

                                                    -----------        -----------        -----------        -----------
 Net income (loss)                                  $    18,301        $  (305,428)       $  (547,836)       $(3,423,444)
                                                    ===========        ===========        ===========        ===========


Number of shares:
     Weighted average shares outstanding              9,044,186          8,939,346          9,020,105          8,916,287
     Incremental shares for outstanding
          stock options                                 379,100                 --                 --                 --
                                                    -----------        -----------        -----------        -----------
                                                      9,423,286          8,939,346          9,020,105          8,916,287
                                                    ===========        ===========        ===========        ===========

Per share amounts:
     Income (loss) before cumulative effect
          of a change in accounting principle       $        --        $     (0.03)       $     (0.06)       $     (0.02)

     Cumulative effect on prior years (to
          December 31, 1995) of changing
          accounting for pre-contract costs                                                                        (0.36)

                                                    -----------        -----------        -----------        -----------
      Net income (loss)                             $        --        $     (0.03)       $     (0.06)       $     (0.38)
                                                    ===========        ===========        ===========        ===========
</TABLE>





                                       15
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS CREATED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned officer of Stratagene Corporation (“Stratagene”or the “Company”) hereby certifies that:

(i) the accompanying annual report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”); and

(ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: March 13, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ STEVE R.  MARTIN                       |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |   | Steve R. Martin                            |
|                      |   |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                      |   |   |
|                      |   |   |

 

This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “SecuritiesAct”), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to theliability of that section and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Stratagene and will be retained byStratagene and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6397
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTON WENDELL DION SMITH, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, District Judge. (CR-91-23) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anton Wendell Dion Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for return of seized property pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith , No. CR-91-23 (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order entered July 25, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01479-CR

ZACHARIAH ARTHUR WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1353277-J

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 778

To recognize the birthdays of Presidents George Washington and Abraham 

Lincoln. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland (for himself and Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Government Reform 

A BILL

To recognize the birthdays of Presidents George Washington 

and Abraham Lincoln.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington-Lincoln 

5 Recognition Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WASHINGTON’S BIRTHDAY. 

7 The legal public holiday known as Washington’s 

8 Birthday, as specified in section 6103 of title 5, United 

9 States Code, shall be referred to by that name and no 

10 other—
2

•HR 778 IH 

1 (1) by all entities and officials of the United 

2 States Government; and 

3 (2) whenever it appears in any publication 

4 funded in whole or in part by Federal funds. 

5 SEC. 3. PROCLAMATION ON LINCOLN’S BIRTHDAY. 

6 The Congress requests that the President issue a 

7 proclamation each year recognizing the anniversary of the 

8 birth of President Abraham Lincoln and calling upon the 

9 people of the United States to observe such anniversary 

10 with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF STRATAGENE CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          JURISDICTION
         NAME                             OF FORMATION
--------------------------------          ---------------
<S>                                       <C>
Stratagene California                     California
Stratagene Japan KK                       Japan
BioCrest Corporation                      Delaware
BioCrest, BV                              The Netherlands
BioCrest Logistics, BV                    The Netherlands
BioCrest Management, L.L.C.               Delaware
BioCrest Limited, L.L.C.                  Delaware
BioCrest Manufacturing, L.P.              Delaware
BioCrest Sales, L.P.                      Delaware
Phenogenex, L.L.C.                        Delaware
Iobion Informatics, L.L.C                 Delaware
Iobion Informatics (Canada) Ltd.          Canada
Iobion Management, L.L.C                  Delaware
Iobion Limited, L.L.C.                    Delaware
Iobion, L.P.                              Texas
Hycor Biomedical Inc.                     Delaware
Hycor Biomedical Ltd.                     Scotland
Hycor Biomedical GmbH                     Germany
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Tzvika Friedman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of
     Alvarion Ltd.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.


Date: February 9, 2006


                                        /s/ Tzvika Friedman
                                        -------------------------
                                        Tzvika Friedman
                                        Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 141 (Friday, July 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Indian Health Service


Request of Public Comment: 60-Day Proposed Information 
Collection; Indian Health Service Forms To Implement the Privacy Rule 
(45 CFR Parts 160 and 164); Correction

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Indian Health Service published a document in the Federal 
Register (FR) on June 24, 2009. The document contained two errors.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Betty Gould, Regulations Officer, 
801 Thompson Avenue, TMP, Suite 450, Rockville, MD 20852, Telephone 
(301) 443-7899. (This is not a toll-free number.)

Correction

    In the Federal Register of June 24, 2009 in FR Doc. E9-14841, on 
page 30095, in the third column, second line, 45 CFR 164.522: change 
164.522(a)(2)(1) to 164.522(a)(2); and on page 30095, in the table 45 
CFR Section/IHS form, change 164.506, IHS-810 to 164.508, IHS-810.

    Dated: July 17, 2009.
Yvette Roubideaux,
Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. E9-17452 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-16-M
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 582

To amend the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, to provide the Secretary 

of Agriculture with administrative authority to investigate live poultry 

dealers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Ms. KAPTUR (for herself and Mr. PRICE of North Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL

To amend the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, to provide 

the Secretary of Agriculture with administrative authority to investigate live poultry dealers, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REGULATION OF COMMERCE IN POULTRY AND 

4 POULTRY PRODUCTS UNDER PACKERS AND 

5 STOCKYARDS ACT, 1921. 

6 (a) REMOVAL OF POULTRY SLAUGHTER REQUIRE7 MENT FROM DEFINITIONS.—Section 2(a) of the Packers 

8 and Stockyards Act, 1921 (7 U.S.C. 182), is amended—
2

•HR 582 IH 

1 (1) by striking paragraph (8) and inserting the 

2 following new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(8) The term ‘poultry grower’ means any person en4 gaged in the business of raising or caring for live poultry 

5 under a poultry growing arrangement, whether the poultry 

6 is owned by such person or by another person;’’; 

7 (2) in paragraph (9), by striking ‘‘and cares for 

8 live poultry for delivery, in accord with another’s in9 structions, for slaughter’’ and inserting ‘‘or cares for 

10 live poultry in accordance with another person’s in11 structions’’; and 

12 (3) in paragraph (10), by striking ‘‘for the pur13 pose of either slaughtering it or selling it for slaugh14 ter by another’’. 

15 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY

16 OVER LIVE POULTRY DEALERS.—Sections 203, 204, and 

17 205 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 193, 194, 195) are amended 

18 by inserting ‘‘or live poultry dealer’’ after ‘‘packer’’ each 

19 place it appears. 

20 (c) AUTHORITY TO REQUEST TEMPORARY INJUNC21 TION OR RESTRAINING ORDER.—Section 408 of such Act 

22 (7 U.S.C. 228a) is amended by striking ‘‘on account of 

23 poultry’’ and inserting ‘‘on account of poultry or poultry 

24 care’’. 
3

•HR 582 IH 

1 (d) VIOLATIONS BY LIVE POULTRY DEALERS.—Sec2 tion 411 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 228b–2) is amended—

3 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘of section 

4 207 or section 410’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘provisions of 

6 section 207 or section 410’’ and inserting ‘‘provi7 sion’’.

Æ