alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: Data may not sum to 100 percent due to rounding. SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 4-6. Blacks and Hispanics are less likely than are 

whites and Asians to be employed in management and 

professional occupations

12 10

12 7

4

20

25 26

22

21

15

24

16

24

36

27

47

17

16 18

0

20

40

60

80

100

White Black or African

American

Asian Hispanic or

Latino

2006

Percent of employed

Service occupations

Sales and office 

occupations

Management, 

professional, and related 

occupations

Natural resources, 

construction, and 

maintenance occupations

Production, transportation, 

and material moving 

occupations

Chart 4-6. Blacks and Hispanics are less likely than are 

whites and Asians to be employed in management and 

professional occupations

• In 2006, blacks and Hispanics were less likely to be employed in management, 

professional, and related occupations than their white or Asian counterparts. 

• Blacks and Hispanics were more likely than whites or Asians to work in 

service occupations. 

• Hispanics were more likely than whites, blacks, or Asians to work in natural 

resources, construction, and maintenance occupations.
**Exhibit    21.1** **List of    Subsidiaries**      **Subsidiaries of Greenfield Online, Inc.**    **Name**  **Jurisdiction**     Greenfield Online Canada Ltd.       Canada     SRVY Acquisition GmbH      Germany     Greenfield Online Private Ltd.       India     Ciao Australia Ltd.       Australia     Ciao USA, Inc.       United States     Greenfield Online Japan Ltd.       Japan      **Subsidiaries of SRVY Acquisition GmbH**    **Name**  **Jurisdiction**     Ciao GmbH      Germany     Ciao Romania S.R.L.      Romania     Ciao Services GmbH      Germany      **Subsidiaries of Ciao GmbH**    **Name**  **Jurisdiction** **Ciao France SAS**      France     Ciao Surveys GmbH      Germany     Ciao Shopping S.R.L.      Romania      **Subsidiaries of Ciao Surveys GmbH**    **Name**  **Jurisdiction**     Ciao Surveys SAS      France     Ciao Netherlands BV      Netherlands
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the filing by Rush Financial Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2006 (the "Report"), I, Randy Rutledge, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operation of the Company.




                                                /s/ Randy Rutledge
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Randy Rutledge
                                                Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  May 22, 2006


This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent as shall be expressly set forth by
specific reference in such filing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 2, 2017

t0530

Order 

Clerk

June 2, 2017

155047

PNC BANK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 155047

COA: 333441 

Macomb CC: 2014-004005-CH

ERCOLE DiSTEFANO, JOANNE DiSTEFANO,

NORTH CRE VENTURE 2010-2, LLC, and

FCI LENDER SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants, 

and

SELECT COMMERCIAL ASSETS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 23, 2016 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, C.J. (concurring).

I concur in the Court’s order of denial. Plaintiff here relies heavily on Cordes v 

Great Lakes Excavating & Equip Rental, Inc, unpublished per curiam opinion of the 

Court of Appeals, decided June 7, 2012 (Docket No. 304003), in which that Court held 

that a mortgagor’s affidavit stating that an earlier mortgage on the property had been 

improperly discharged placed a subsequent purchaser on notice of the first mortgagee’s 

interest and the subsequent mortgagee’s interest was thus subordinate. Without 

determining whether Cordes was rightly decided, I write separately only to note that 

Cordes is clearly distinguishable from the instant case. In Cordes, the affidavit of 

erroneous discharge was recorded before the execution and recording of the second 

mortgage. Here, the affidavit of erroneous discharge was recorded after the second 

mortgage had been executed and recorded. Only the assignment of the second mortgage 

occurred after the affidavit of erroneous discharge had been recorded. Thus, whether 

unpublished or published, Cordes is distinguishable and does not, in my judgment, 

support plaintiff’s claim.
S07Y1037, S07Y1038.

#### IN THE MATTER OF CURTIS GLEN SHOEMAKER (two cases).

(651 SE2d 82)

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on two notices of discipline seeking disbarment against Curtis Glen Shoemaker. The notices allege violations of Rules 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II), 8.1,1.3,1.4, 3.2 and 1.16 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. The maximum penalty for a violation of Rules 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II), 8.1, and 1.3 is disbarment and for Rules 1.4, 3.2 and 1.16 is a public reprimand. Shoemaker was personally served with the notices of discipline, but failed to reject them. Shoemaker is thus in default, has no right to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to such discipline as the Court may determine. Bar Rule 4-208.1.

Pursuant to his default, the following facts are deemed admitted: In February 2006, Shoemaker issued four checks from his escrow account that were returned for insufficient funds. Two were issued to third parties and two he drew himself. He refused to respond to the State Bar’s inquiry regarding the insufficient fund notices. Additionally, in March 2006, Shoemaker was retained to represent a client in civil litigation and was paid a retainer fee of $ 1,750. Shoemaker failed to do any work on the matter, closed his office, failed to communicate with the client, failed to return the client’s file, and failed to refund any of the retainer fee. Shoemaker also failed to respond to the State Bar’s notice of investigation.

Shoemaker has a prior disciplinary record: in 1994 he was suspended for two years, *In the Matter of Shoemaker,*264 Ga. 625 (449 SE2d 291) (1994) and in 1997 he received a public reprimand, *In the Matter of Shoemaker,*S97Y0826 (April 11, 1997).

Having reviewed the record, we agree that disbarment is the appropriate sanction. It is hereby ordered that the name of Curtis *471Glen Shoemaker be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Shoemaker is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Decided September 24, 2007.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, A. M. Christina Petrig, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Disbarred.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



CERTIFICATION



I, Jim Currie, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of SMTC Corporation;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: April 28, 2014



|/s/ Jim Currie                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Jim Currie                                                    
|                                                              
|Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
  CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Focus Enhancements, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary L. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/Gary L. Williams
  Gary L. Williams
 Chief Financial Officer
 November 15, 2004
  *The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Focus Enhancements, Inc. and such statement will be retained by Focus Enhancements, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
 37
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITEDSTATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’sknowledge: 

1) the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended January2, 2011 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in theCompany’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended January 2, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: March 11, 2011 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0307

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

ROBERT MICHAEL ZERMENO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 5, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 28 2023

11/28/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0307
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harold F. Packer, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 519]

*1220Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Smith, Centra, Green and Gorski, JJ.
**Exhibit 21**

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

OPNET Analysis, Inc. (formerly MIL 3 Analysis, Inc.), a corporation organized underthe laws of the State of Delaware. 

OPNET Technologies Societe par Actions Simplifiee, a corporation organized under the laws of France. 

OPNET Technologies Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of England and Wales. 

OPNET Technologies b.v.b.a, (formerly WDM NetDesign, b.v.b.a), a corporation organized under the laws of Belgium. 

OPNETTechnologies Pty Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of Australia. 

OPNET Technologies, GmbH, a corporation organized under the laws of Germany.
Exhibit 32.1 
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley act of 2002.

In connection with the Annual Report of Gulf Coast Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Massimiliano Pozzoni, President of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: May 5, 2005      /s/ Massimiliano Pozzoni   Massimiliano Pozzoni, CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT SET FORTH IN THE REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED 11-2-96 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
IT'S ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                       1,585,673
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 15,419,498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,906,704
<PP&E>                                      13,970,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,196,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,263,061
<BONDS>                                     17,232,516
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,889
<COMMON>                                        28,562
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,108,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,196,948
<SALES>                                     69,537,658
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            69,537,658
<CGS>                                       49,082,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,082,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            22,930,810
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,190,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,665,951)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,665,951)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,665,951)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.28)
        

</TABLE>
# cpsaat47
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 02-4615



# 
E RIC S EDELLT AYLOR ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-01-398, CR-01-399) Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 6, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, John A. Dusenbury, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM:Eric Taylor appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to multiple counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (2000). Taylor’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counselstates there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but contends on Taylor’s behalf that his sentence violates Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Taylor has filed a pro se supplemental brief in which he challenges the district court’s sentencing guidelines calculation. Taylor also argues that his sentence violates Apprendi . Finding no error, we affirm. Taylor first objects to a three-level increase in his offense level, pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2B3.1(b)(2)(E) (2000), for brandishing a firearm. Taylor contends the enhancement violates Apprendi because brandishing was not alleged in the indictment. This argument is without merit. Taylor’s sentence was well within the statutory twenty-year maximum, and is unaffected by Apprendi

. See United States v. Kinter , 235 F.3d 192, 201-02 (4th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 532 U.S. 937 (2001).Taylor next objects to the district court’s consideration of dismissed conduct in determining his sentencing range. This court has repeatedly upheld such consideration of dismissed conduct. See , e.g. , United States v. Barber , 119 F.3d 276, 284 (4th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we find the enhancement was proper.
Pursuant to Anders , this court has reviewed the record for reversible error and found none. We therefore affirm Taylor’s sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, then counsel may 2 U NITED S TATES v. T AYLORmove this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentionsare adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. T AYLOR
Advance copies of this statement are made available to the press 

under lock-up conditions with the explicit understanding that 

the data are embargoed until 8:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time. 

Statement of 

Erica L. Groshen 

Commissioner 

Bureau of Labor Statistics 

Friday, April 5, 2013

Nonfarm payroll employment edged up in March (+88,000); job 

gains over the prior 12 months had averaged 169,000 per month. 

The unemployment rate, at 7.6 percent, changed little in March. 

Over the month, employment grew in professional and business 

services and in health care but decreased in retail trade. 

Employment rose by 51,000 in professional and business 

services over the month. Job gains in the prior 12 months had 

averaged 44,000 per month. Over the month, employment continued 

to trend up throughout most of the sector, including a gain of 

11,000 jobs in accounting and bookkeeping services. 

Health care employment rose by 23,000 in March, about in 

line with the average monthly growth over the prior 12 months. 

In March, employment increased by 15,000 in ambulatory health 

care services, such as home health care, and by 8,000 in 

hospitals. 
2 

Employment in construction continued to trend up in March 

(+18,000), with growth in specialty trade contractors. Job gains 

in construction picked up this past fall; since September, the 

industry has added 169,000 jobs. 

Retail trade employment decreased by 24,000 in March. Job 

growth in the industry had averaged 32,000 per month over the 

prior 6 months. In March, employment declined in clothing 

stores, building material and garden supply stores, and 

electronics and appliance stores. 

Within government, employment in the U.S. Postal Service 

declined by 12,000 in March. Employment in other major 

industries showed little change over the month. 

Average hourly earnings of all employees on private nonfarm 

payrolls changed little (+1 cent) in March. Over the past 12 

months, average hourly earnings have risen by 42 cents, or 1.8 

percent. From February 2012 to February 2013, the Consumer Price 

Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased by 2.0 percent. 

Turning now to our survey of households, the unemployment 

rate, at 7.6 percent, and the number of unemployed persons, at 

11.7 million, were both little changed in March. The labor force 

declined by about half a million over the month, and the labor 

force participation rate decreased by 0.2 percentage point to 

63.3 percent. 
3 

The employment-population ratio was about unchanged at 58.5 

percent in March. Among the employed, the number working part 

time for economic reasons fell by 350,000 to 7.6 million. These 

individuals would have preferred full-time employment, but had 

their hours cut or were unable to find full-time work. 

In summary, nonfarm payroll employment edged up by 88,000 

in March, and the unemployment rate was little changed at 7.6 

percent.
###                                                         The AAL Mutual Funds
# laucnty04

&8Page &P of &N
# TOC

# Charts

# Charts

# Calculations

# 1 a

# 1 b

# 2 a

http://www.tushar-mehta.com/excel/newsgroups/dynamic_charts/index.html

http://www.cpearson.com/excel/indirect.htm

http://www.cpearson.com/Excel/Rank.aspx

http://peltiertech.com/Excel/Charts/ConditionalChart1.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7le-m8YRP6M

http://www.techonthenet.com/excel/formulas/offset.php

# 2 b

Return to Table of Contents

# 3 a

Return to Table of Contents

# 3 b

Return to Table of Contents

# 4 a

Return to Table of Contents

# 4 b

Return to Table of Contents

# 5 a

Return to Table of Contents

# 5 b

Return to Table of Contents

# 6 a

Return to Table of Contents

# 6 b

Return to Table of Contents

# 7 a

Return to Table of Contents

# 7 b

Return to Table of Contents

# 8

Return to Table of Contents

# 9

Return to Table of Contents

Return to Table of Contents

Return to Table of Contents

Return to Table of Contents

Return to Table of Contents

Return to Table of Contents