alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2  **Independent
Accountants’ Report**
 
 GE Dealer
Floorplan Master Note Trust
 General
Electric Capital Corporation:
 
 We have
examined management’s assertion as set forth in Appendix I, that General
Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”) complied, as servicer, with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s *Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* , to the
extent applicable for GECC relating to GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust
(“GEDFMNT”), as of December 31, 2004 and for the period from August 12, 2004
through December 31, 2004. Management is responsible for GECC’s compliance with
those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s
assertion about GECC’s compliance based on our examination.
 
 Our
examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about GECC’s compliance with the
minimum servicing statndards, to the extent applicable, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on GECC’s compliance with the
minimum servicing standards.
 
 In our
opinion, management’s assertion that GECC complied with the aforementioned
minimum servicing standards, to the extent applicable for GECC relating to
GEDFMNT, as of December 31, 2004 and during the period from August 12, 2004
through December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material
respects.
 
 /s/
(signed) KPMG LLP
 
 March 15,
2005
 
 
 
  
  
 **Appendix
I**
 **Management
Assertion**
 **GE
Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust**
 
 Management
of General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”), as servicer, is responsible
for compliance with the servicing requirements of the Servicing Agreement
dated as of August 12, 2004 (the “Agreement”), among GE Dealer Floorplan Master
Note Trust (“GEDFMNT”) and GECC as servicer.
 
 Management
has performed an evaluation of GECC’s compliance with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s *Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* , to the
extent applicable to GECC as such standards relate to GEDFMNT.
 
 As of
December 31, 2004, and for the period from August 12, 2004 to December 31, 2004,
GECC complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards
set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s *Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* , to
th extent applicable to GECC as such standards relate to GEDFMNT.
 
 GECC, as
Servicer for GEDFMNT, acting through its GE Commercial Finance Operating
Segment:
 
 
 /s/
Michael Cipolla
 Michael
Cipolla
 *Managing
Director*       **
 
 March 25,
2005
Exhibit 99.0

**INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT’S REPORT**

Board of Directors and Stockholders Slippery Rock Financial Corporation

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Slippery Rock FinancialCorporation and subsidiary as of March 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the three-monthperiods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity for the three-month period ended March 31, 2003.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’smanagement.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim financial information consistsprincipally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standardsgenerally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Statesof America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002, and therelated consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated January 31, 2003 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidatedfinancial statements.  

| /s/ S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C. |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| **Wexford, PA**          |   |
| **April 11, 2003**       |   |

24
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 985

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 111 West Washington

Street in Bowling Green, Ohio, as the ‘‘DelbertL. Latta Post Office Building’’.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 985

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 111 West Washington Street in Bowling

Green, Ohio, as the ‘‘Delbert L. Latta Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 985 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 111 West Washington Street in Bowling Green,

4 Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Delbert L.

5 Latta Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Delbert L. Latta Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 13, 2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

49. Certification and licensing status of the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years and over by

employment status, 2016 annual averages

Employment status

Number of persons (in thousands) Percent distribution

Total

With a certification or license1

Total

With a certification or license1

Total

With a

certification,

but no

license

With a

license2

Without

a

certification

or

license

Total

With a

certification,

but no

license

With a

license2

Without

a

certification

or

license

Civilian noninstitutional population............ 253,538 44,499 4,778 39,721 209,038 100.0 17.6 1.9 15.7 82.4

Civilian labor force........................... 159,187 38,801 4,159 34,642 120,386 100.0 24.4 2.6 21.8 75.6

Employed................................... 151,436 37,829 4,019 33,810 113,607 100.0 25.0 2.7 22.3 75.0

Usually work full time................... 123,761 32,561 3,543 29,018 91,200 100.0 26.3 2.9 23.4 73.7

Usually work part time................. 27,675 5,268 476 4,792 22,407 100.0 19.0 1.7 17.3 81.0

Unemployed................................ 7,751 972 140 832 6,779 100.0 12.5 1.8 10.7 87.5

Not in the labor force........................ 94,351 5,698 619 5,079 88,652 100.0 6.0 0.7 5.4 94.0

1 A person may have more than one certification or license.

2 Persons with a license may also have a certification.

NOTE: Certifications are issued by a non-governmental certification body and convey that an individual has the knowledge or skill to perform a

specific job. A license is awarded by a government agency and conveys a legal authority to work in an occupation. Full time is 35 hours or more per

week; part time is less than 35 hours. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

FAINA KLIGER , Appellant,

v.

SETH E. SCHNEIDERMAN, P.A. , Appellee.

No. 4D 21

- 1105

[ October 28, 2021 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Terri

- Ann Miller , Judge; L.T. Case No. COSO19

- 14110

.
Faina Kliger

, North Miami Beach

, pro se

.
Seth E. Schneiderman of Seth E. Schneiderman, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C ONNER , C.J., M AY and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 21.1



              Subsidiaries of Better Minerals & Aggregates Company


U.S. SILICA COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
BMAC SERVICES CO., INC., a Delaware corporation
BETTER MATERIALS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation
BMC TRUCKING, INC., a Delaware corporation
CHIPPEWA FARMS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation
COMMERCIAL AGGREGATES TRANSPORTATION AND SALES, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company
COMMERCIAL STONE CO., INC., a Pennsylvania corporation
THE FULTON LAND AND TIMBER COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation
GEORGE F. PETTINOS, INC., a Delaware corporation
OTTAWA SILICA COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
PENNSYLVANIA GLASS SAND CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
STONE MATERIALS COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 30, 2010 of Stein Mart, Inc. (the Form 10-Q), I, Gregory W. Kleffner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                     
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 8, 2010 |  | /s/ Gregory W. Kleffner                             
|                       |  | Gregory W. Kleffner                                 
|                       |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



18
12

Table 4. Employment status by marital status and sex, 2005 annual averages

(Numbers in thousands)

 Civilian labor force 

 Employed Unemployed 

 Total Percent of 

population Total Percent of 

labor force 

Total

Total, 16 years and over............ 226,082 149,320 66.0 141,730 62.7 7,591 5.1 76,762

 Married, spouse present.......... 119,750 82,712 69.1 80,256 67.0 2,456 3.0 37,038

 Unmarried, total....................... 106,332 66,608 62.6 61,473 57.8 5,135 7.7 39,724

 Never married...................... 62,172 42,397 68.2 38,593 62.1 3,804 9.0 19,774

 Other marital status............... 44,161 24,211 54.8 22,880 51.8 1,331 5.5 19,949

 Divorced............................. 22,140 15,851 71.6 15,030 67.9 821 5.2 6,289

 Separated......................... 8,175 5,622 68.8 5,237 64.1 384 6.8 2,553

 Widowed........................... 13,846 2,738 19.8 2,613 18.9 126 4.6 11,107

Women

Total, 16 years and over............ 116,931 69,288 59.3 65,757 56.2 3,531 5.1 47,643

 Married, spouse present.......... 59,205 35,941 60.7 34,773 58.7 1,168 3.3 23,263

 Unmarried, total...................... 57,726 33,346 57.8 30,983 53.7 2,363 7.1 24,380

 Never married...................... 29,046 19,183 66.0 17,588 60.6 1,595 8.3 9,864

 Other marital status............... 28,680 14,163 49.4 13,396 46.7 768 5.4 14,516

 Divorced............................ 12,990 9,157 70.5 8,711 67.1 446 4.9 3,833

 Separated......................... 4,553 2,906 63.8 2,680 58.9 226 7.8 1,647

 Widowed........................... 11,137 2,100 18.9 2,005 18.0 96 4.5 9,037

Men

Total, 16 years and over............ 109,151 80,033 73.3 75,973 69.6 4,059 5.1 29,119

 Married, spouse present.......... 60,545 46,771 77.2 45,483 75.1 1,287 2.8 13,775

 Unmarried, total...................... 48,606 33,262 68.4 30,490 62.7 2,772 8.3 15,344

 Never married...................... 33,125 23,214 70.1 21,006 63.4 2,209 9.5 9,911

 Other marital status............... 15,481 10,048 64.9 9,484 61.3 563 5.6 5,433

 Divorced........................... 9,151 6,694 73.2 6,319 69.0 375 5.6 2,457

 Separated......................... 3,622 2,715 75.0 2,558 70.6 158 5.8 906

 Widowed........................... 2,708 638 23.6 608 22.4 30 4.8 2,070

 SOURCE: Current Population Survey, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor

Marital status and sex

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

 Not in labor 

force Total Percent of 

population
# table14afull17

&8Page &P of &N	
GP2017/HTML%20files%20for%202017/gp17_14.htmGP2017/HTML%20files%20for%202017/gp17_14.htmGP2017/HTML%20files%20for%202017/gp17_14.htmGP2017/HTML%20files%20for%202017/gp17_14.htmGP2017/HTML%20files%20for%202017/gp17_14.htmGP2017/HTML%20files%20for%202017/gp17_14.htmGP2017/HTML%20files%20for%202017/gp17_14.htmGP2017/HTML%20files%20for%202017/gp17_14.htmGP2017/HTML%20files%20for%202017/gp17_14.htm
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FocusEnhancements, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Brett Moyer, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Brett A. Moyer      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Brett A. Moyer          |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November 14, 2005  |

 

*The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  A signed original of this written statementor other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to FocusEnhancements, Inc. and such statement will be retained by FocusEnhancements, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.*

 

----
# laucnty98

&8Page &P of &N
# 19SUMM3_00
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

KEITH OSHAY REYNOLDS,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00096-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20090D02381) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Keith Oshay Reynolds is attempting to appeal his two drug-related convictions. Because 

he did not file a timely notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal.

On April 17, 2013, Appellant filed his notice of appeal in the trial court. The district clerk 

forwarded the notice to this Court and also provided this Court with a docketing certificate 

indicating that Appellant was convicted and sentenced on October 12, 2012. After receiving 

these documents, this Court filed Appellant’s notice of appeal on April 18, 2013. That same day, 

the clerk of this Court mailed a letter to Appellant, advising him that she had filed his notice of 

appeal. The clerk further advised Appellant of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal did not appear to be timely. The clerk informed 

Appellant that unless he could show grounds for continuing the appeal within ten days, the appeal 
2

could be dismissed without further notice. To this date, Appellant has not responded to the 

clerk’s letter. A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Olivo v. 

State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). Because there is no indication that a motion 

for new trial was filed, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed on November 12, 2012 –

thirty days after the day sentence was imposed in open court.1 See TEX.R.APP.P. 26.2(a); see also

TEX.R.APP.P. 4.1(a) (providing that if the last day of a period falls on a weekend or a legal holiday, 

the period extends to the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday). To obtain an 

extension of time to file the notice of appeal, Appellant was required to file both the notice of 

appeal and a motion for extension of time within fifteen days of the due date. See TEX.R.APP.P.

26.3. Appellant did not comply with this procedure. His notice of appeal, received in this Court 

on April 18, 2013, was not timely. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

May 15, 2013

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

 

1 November 11, 2012 fell on Sunday.
Opinion filed Au gust 20, 20 09



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

____________ 

### No. 1 1- 09 -0 01 19 -CV

____ ____ __ JAM ES WILL IAM HORNS BY, Ap pellant

V. TEX AS DE PA RTM ENT OF CRIMINA L JUS TICE ET A L, Ap pellees

On App eal from the 259th Distric t Court

Jones County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 021871

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N J ames Willi am Hornsby sued t he Te x as De partment of Criminal Just ice, Executive Dire ctor Br ad L ivingston, Corre ctional Off icer Fr ance s Odom, and L ieutenant Santos J. Garcia, Jr. for ove r $9,000 in damag es re sulting fr om the alleg ed seizure of his pe rsonal items. The trial c ourt dismissed Ho rn s b y ’s ac tion for fa ilure to comply with T EX . C IV . P R AC . & R EM . C ODE ANN . §§ 14.001-.014 (V e rn on 20 02 ). We a ff

ir m. On appe al, Hornsby

briefs thre e issues. In his first issue, Hornsby argues that the trial c ourt abused its discre tion because his claims are n o t frivolous. Next, he argues that the district cle rk2

vio late d h is r ig hts to a c c e ss t he c ourt s. F ina lly , H or

ns by c on te nd s that his cla im is “ a lmo st e nti re ly identical” to the case of Minix v. G onzales , 162 S.W .3d 635 (Tex. App.—Houston [14t h Dist.] 2005, no pet.). Hornsby does not addre ss t h e t ri al court’s de termination that he fa iled to comply with the mandatory elements in Cha pter 14. The re cord doe s not support Hornsby ’s claims conc erningthe actions of the cler

k of the trial court. We find the Mi nix case to be distinguishable. I n Mi nix , b oth the trial cour

t and the appe llate cour

t addre ssed the meri t s o f t h e cl ai ms advanc ed. In the pre sent case , th e tr ia l c o urt w a s u n a b le to c o n s id e r

th e me r it s o f

H o r n s b y ’ s c la im s . A ll o f

H o r n sby ’s contentions have been c onsidered. E ach is ove rruled. The orde r of the tr ial court is af firmed.
PER C URI AM August 20, 2009 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , an d

S tr an g e , J.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 2, 2020 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00447-CV
IN THE MATTER OF B.N., A JUVENILE
On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JD-18-01337-W

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Schenck, and Browning Opinion by Justice Browning Before the Court is the November 24, 2020 motion for a voluntar y dismissal signed by B.N. and his attorney. The motion states that B.N. no longer wishes to pursue the appeal becau se the parties have fully compromised an d settled all issues, and they have agreed the trial j udgment remains in full force a nd effect. Attached to the motion is a “Waiver of Right s,” also signed by B.N. and his attorney. We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a) (civil appeal may be dismissed on appellant’s motion); T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. §§ 56.01(b), 51.09, 51.10.

200477F.P05 /John G. Browning/ JOHN G. BROWNING JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

IN THE MATTER OF B.N., A JUVENILE

No. 05-20-00447-CV On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JD-18-01337- W. Opinion delivered by Justice Browning. Justices Whitehill and Schenck participating.

In accordance with this Court’ s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered December 2, 2020
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 as filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kronos Advanced
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.
and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.





/s/ Daniel R. Dwight
--------------------------------------
Daniel R. Dwight
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Daniel R. Dwight
--------------------------------------
Daniel R. Dwight
Acting Chief Financial Officer