alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 982

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT

To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations 

issued by the Government of American Samoa.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 982 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TAX TREATMENT OF BONDS 

2 AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS ISSUED BY GOV3 ERNMENT OF AMERICAN SAMOA. 

4 (a) EXEMPTION OF ALL BONDS FROM INCOME TAX5 ATION BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—Sub6 section (b) of section 202 of Public Law 98–454 (48 

7 U.S.C. 1670) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(b) EXEMPTION OF ALL BONDS FROM INCOME

9 TAXATION BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The interest on any bond 

11 or other obligation issued by or on behalf of the 

12 Government of American Samoa shall be exempt 

13 from taxation by the Government of American 

14 Samoa and the governments of any of the several 

15 States, the District of Columbia, any territory or 

16 possession of the United States, and any subdivision 

17 thereof. 

18 ‘‘(2) EXEMPTION APPLICABLE ONLY TO INCOME

19 TAXES.—The exemption provided by paragraph (1) 

20 shall not apply to gift, estate, inheritance, legacy, 

21 succession, or other wealth transfer taxes.’’. 
3

HR 982 RFS 

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 This Act shall apply to obligations issued after the 

3 date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives November 4, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         816,417
<SECURITIES>                                 1,417,185
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,834,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (177,920)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,327,194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,804,109
<PP&E>                                       2,636,360
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,154,924)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,764,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,157,791
<BONDS>                                      1,002,283
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           375
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,032,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,764,179
<SALES>                                      9,760,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,760,241
<CGS>                                        7,769,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,187,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (139,914)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (139,914)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (78,475)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (218,389)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0





</TABLE>
[No. 32007-0-II.

Division Two.

October 25, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Stephan Douglas Kaufman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 03-1-01754-3, Richard A. Strophy, J., entered July 21, 2004. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Hunt, J., and Morgan, J. Pro Tern.
EXHIBIT 32.2

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO








18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,








AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO








SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of Infinite Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Glickman, VP Finance and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and








(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
SEC or its staff upon request.





Dated: November 12,
2019








__/s/ Richard
Glickman


Richard Glickman


VP Finance and Chief Accounting Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT (12)(a)
                         WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
                 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
($ IN MILLIONS)                                   1995   1994   1993   1992    1991
                                                  ----   ----   ----   ----    ----
<S>                                              <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes
  and minority interest                          $ (40) $ (17) $(353) $ 275  $  193
Less: Equity in income (loss) of
      50 percent or less owned affiliates            1     (4)    (4)    (1)    (17)
Add: Dividends from affiliates                      --     --     --     --       2
     Fixed charges excluding capitalized 
     interest                                      257    161    194    205     207
                                                 -----  -----  -----  -----  ------
Earnings as adjusted                             $ 216  $ 148  $(155) $ 481  $  419
                                                 =====  =====  =====  =====  ======
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                               $ 233  $ 134  $ 165  $ 169  $  176
  Rental expense                                    24     27     29     36      31
  Capitalized interest                              --     --     --     --       6
                                                 -----  -----  -----  -----  ------
Total fixed charges                              $ 257  $ 161  $ 194  $ 205  $  213
                                                 =====  =====  =====  =====  ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  (a)    (b)    (c)  2.35x   1.97x
                                                 =====  =====  =====  =====  ======

<FN>
(a)  Additional income before income taxes and minority interest of $41 million
would be necessary to attain a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 1.00x for
the year ended December 31, 1995.

(b)  Additional income before income taxes and minority interest of $13 million
would be necessary to attain a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 1.00x for
the year ended December 31, 1994.

(c)  Additional income before income taxes and minority interest of $349
million would be necessary to attain a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of
1.00x for the year ended December 31, 1993.

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,955
<SECURITIES>                                    14,423
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,521
<PP&E>                                           2,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,127
<SALES>                                          6,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,376
<CGS>                                              397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,686
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,847)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,733)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,114)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     885
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,229)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Infinite Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Smith, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      May 15, 2009/s/ Michael S. SmithMichael
      S. SmithChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive
Officer)





A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 886 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 886

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment of 
   dependency and indemnity compensation to the survivors of former 
 prisoners of war who died on or before September 30, 1999, under the 
   same eligibility conditions as apply to payment of dependency and 
indemnity compensation to the survivors of former prisoners of war who 
                          die after that date.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2003

Mr. Holden (for himself, Mr. Evans, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Towns, Mr. Sanders, 
 Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
 Carson of Oklahoma, Mr. Frost, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Paul, Mr. Strickland, 
Mrs. Maloney, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Hefley, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Rangel, 
 Mrs. Jones of Ohio, and Mr. McGovern) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment of 
   dependency and indemnity compensation to the survivors of former 
 prisoners of war who died on or before September 30, 1999, under the 
   same eligibility conditions as apply to payment of dependency and 
indemnity compensation to the survivors of former prisoners of war who 
                          die after that date.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 1318(b)(3) 
of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking ``who died 
after September 30, 1999,''.
                                 <all>
```
[907 NYS2d 632]

#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v Stephen G. Bozak, Defendant.

City Court of Troy,

September 8, 2010

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*D. Jeremy Rase,*Esperance, for defendant. *John R Hicks, Corporation Counsel,*Troy *CMatthew Foley*of counsel), for plaintiff.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Matthew J. Turner, J.

Defendant seeks dismissal of a traffic ticket which alleges “Talking on Mobile Device While Driving” in violation of section 1225-c (2) (a) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law on May 30, 2010. Defendant argues that his use of a handheld amateur *712radio does not fit the definition of a mobile telephone and as such the present charge should be dismissed. The People have not submitted a response in opposition.

The Vehicle and Traffic Law defines “Mobile telephone” as a “device used by subscribers and other users of wireless telephone service to access such service” (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c [1] [a]). “Wireless telephone service” is defined as “two-way real time voice telecommunications service that is interconnected to a public switched telephone network and is provided by a *commercial mobile radio service,*as such term is defined by 47 C.F.R. § 20.3” (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c [1] [b] [emphasis added]). A review of 47 CFR 20.3 reveals that Citizens Band Radio Service is defined under *private mobile radio service,*not commercial mobile radio service. Therefore, the court finds that the use of an amateur radio device does not fit the definition of a mobile telephone as defined under the Vehicle and Traffic Law and grants the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 860

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase 

in income taxes on Social Security benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the 1993 increase in income taxes on Social Security benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF 1993 INCREASE IN TAX ON SOCIAL 

4 SECURITY BENEFITS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 86(a) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social se7 curity and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits) is amended 

8 by adding at the end the following new sentence: 

9 ‘‘This paragraph shall not apply to any taxable year 

10 beginning after December 31, 2002.’’
2

•HR 860 IH 

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

2 (1) Paragraph (3) of section 871(a) of such 

3 Code is amended by striking ‘‘85 percent’’ in sub4 paragraph (A) and inserting ‘‘50 percent’’. 

5 (2)(A) Subparagraph (A) of section 121(e)(1) 

6 of the Social Security Amendments of 1983 (Public 

7 Law 98–21) is amended—

8 (i) by striking ‘‘(A) There’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘There’’; 

10 (ii) by striking ‘‘(i)’’ immediately following 

11 ‘‘amounts equivalent to’’; and 

12 (iii) by striking ‘‘, less (ii)’’ and all that 

13 follows and inserting a period. 

14 (B) Paragraph (1) of section 121(e) of such Act 

15 is amended by striking subparagraph (B). 

16 (C) Paragraph (3) of section 121(e) of such Act 

17 is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and by re18 designating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B). 

19 (D) Paragraph (2) of section 121(e) of such 

20 Act is amended in the first sentence by striking 

21 ‘‘paragraph (1)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

24 December 31, 2002.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.2







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Infinite Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James Witzel, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
August 12, 2010





/s/ James WitzelJames
      WitzelChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)




A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### Turner *v.*Shackman.1

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri.*

March 29, 1886.)

1. Depositions—Dedimus Potestatem—Section 866, Rev. St.—State Statutes.

A “common usage, ” within the meaning of section 806, Rev. St., cannot be established by a state statute.

2. Same—Depositions de Bene Esse.

A *dedimus potestatem*will not he granted to take testimony which can bo taken by deposition *de bene esse.*

3. Same—Deposition op Dependant.

Section 866, Rev. St., does not authorize the granting of a *dedim,us potestatem*to take the deposition of a defendant, where the only object appears to he to ascertain what he will swear to before placing him on the witness stand in court, especially where no answer has been filed, and the answer is not yet due.

*184At Law. Motion for dedimus.

*J. C. Normile,*for plaintiff.

*Z. G. Mitchell,*for defendant.

1

 Reported by Benj. F. Rex, Esq., of the St. Louis bar.

Brewer, J.,

*(orally.)*In this case application was made for a *dedimus*to take the testimony of a witness about to leave this jurisdiction, and also the testimony of the defendant. So far as the testimony of the witness about to leave the jurisdiction is concerned, that can be taken by deposition *de bene esse.*As far as the testimony of the defendant is concerned, the application comes within the late decision of *Ex parte Fisk,*113 U. S. 713, S. C. 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 724, in which it is held that the deposition of a party cannot be taken unless it comes within the exceptions named in the federal statutes. Counsel cited to us an opinion by Judge McCrary, in which he interprets the words “common usage” to mean the usage prevalent in the state; but Judge Miller in writing his opinion very emphatically says “it is not according to common usage to call a party in advance of the trial at law, and subject him to all the skill of the opposing counsel to extract something which he may then use or not as suits his purpose. This is a very *special*usage, dependent wholly upon the New York statute.” I do not think the showing made is sufficient to bring the ease within the provision “that when it is necessary to prevent a failure or delay of justice any courts of the United States may grant a *dedimus;”*for while plaintiff alleges in his affidavit that it is necessary to take .the deposition of the defendant in order that he may set out specific matters of account which should have been kept on the defendant’s books, and which have not been, yet his petition is accompanied by an exhibit in which is a full, itemized account, of some ten or a dozen pages, giving dollars and cents, pounds and fractions thereof, etc. Evidently, this is an effort to see what the defendant will testify to before he is put upon the witness stand in presence of the jury.

The motion for *dedimus*will be overruled.

Brother Treat adds a suggestion which is very pertinent in this case. The petition has just been filed; no answer has been filed or is due; and no one can tell in advance whether any testimony will be needed. *Non constat*but that the defendant may admit all that is claimed in the petition.
EXHIBIT 12.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Zvi Slonimsky, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Alvarion Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

      a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c. Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting, and 5. The
company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of
company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

      b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal controls over
financial reporting.


Date: June 23, 2004
                                    /s/ Zvi Slonimsky
                                    -------------------------
                                    Zvi Slonimsky
                                    Chief Executive Officer