T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GI L MAR HU MB E R T O T OR R E S ; L UZ AL E YD A G AR C I A, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73067 A ge nc yN os . A 079- 535- 914

A 079- 535- 915 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , P A E Z , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G i l m arH um be rt o T orr e s and L uz A l e y daG ar c i a , na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of C o l o m b i a, p et i t i o n p ro se fo r rev i ew o f th e B o ardo f Im m i g rat i o n A p p eal s’ (“ B IA ”) o rd er d en yi n g th ei r m o t i o n t o reo p en . O u r j u ri sd i ct i o n i s g o v ern edb y 8 

# FI LED APR24 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 73067 2 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o ran ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , M

a ltyv . A s h c r o

ft , 381 F . 3d 942, 945 ( 9th C i r . 2004) , and w e de nyi n partand di s m i s s i n partthe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e ope n t o appl yf

ora s y l um and w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l a s unt i m e l ybe c aus e the m o tio n w a s f

ile do v e rf

iv e y e ar s a f

te rth e B I A ’s f

in a l o r d e r , se e 8 C .F .R . § 10 03 . 2(c) (2), and p et i t i on er s f ai l ed t o p re se ntm at er i alevi dence of changed c i r c u ms t an c e s i n Co l o mb i at o q u a l i f yf o rth e r e g u l a t o rye x c e p t i o n t o th e t i me lim ita tio n f

o rf ilin g m o tio n s to r e o p e n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; see a l so N aj m ab ad iv. H

older , 59 7 F . 3d 98 3, 99 1 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). T he B I A a l s o di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng pe t i t i one r s ’ m ot i on t o r e o p e n to ap p lyf

o rp r o te c tio n u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e b e c au s e it c o n s id e r e dth e e v id e n c e s ub m itte dan da c te dw ith in its b r o a dd is c r e tio n in det erm i ni ng pet i t i on er s di d n otdem on strat e pri m a f ac i e e l i gi bi l i ty f

or re l i ef . See I N S v . A budu , 485 U . S . 94, 104 ( 1988) ( the B I A m ayde nyam ot i on t o r e ope n f or fa i l ure t o est abl i sh a pri m a f ac i e c as e f

or the un derl yi ng re l i ef

soug ht ).09- 73067 3 F in a lly , w e la c kju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w th e B I A ’s d e c is io n n o t to e x e r c is e its s u as p o n te p o w e rto r e o p e n p r o c e e d in g s . See Mej i a-H erna ndezv. H

older , 633 F . 3d 81 8, 82 3-24 (9th C i r. 20 11 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.