alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1,000
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                            493           
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  36,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     (751)
<INVENTORY>                                                    36,338
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               80,973
<PP&E>                                                         94,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (24,974)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                182,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         154,143
<BONDS>                                                           517
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       22,681
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  182,421
<SALES>                                                       136,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              136,067
<CGS>                                                         121,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 136,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                2,987
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              7,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (10,578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      126
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (10,704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (10,704)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (2.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (2.33)
             


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13

CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Infineon Technologies AG (the "Company") for the annual period ended September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ulrich Schumacher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter J. Fischl, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:

This
certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.

|Date: November 21, 2003 |  | /s/ULRICH SCHUMACHERUlrich Schumacher
Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/PETER J. FISCHLPeter J. Fischl
Chief Financial Officer    

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Christopher B. Farrell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.



By:

/s/ Christopher B. FarrellName:

Christopher B. FarrellTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Occam Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 868 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 868

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 19, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend section 527 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Years 1994 and 1995 to require that certain claims for expropriation by 
 the Government of Nicaragua meet certain requirements for purposes of 
       the prohibition on foreign assistance to that government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nicaragua Property Dispute 
Settlement Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN CLAIMS FOR EXPROPRIATION BY THE GOVERNMENT OF 
              NICARAGUA.

    Section 527 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Years 1994 and 1995 (22 U.S.C. 2370a) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Certain Claims for Expropriation by Government of 
Nicaragua.--(1) Any action of the types set forth in subparagraphs (A), 
(B), and (C) of subsection (a)(1) that was taken by the Government of 
Nicaragua during the period beginning on January 1, 1956, and ending on 
January 9, 2002, shall not be considered in implementing the 
prohibition under subsection (a) unless the action has been presented 
in accordance with the procedure set forth in paragraph (2).
    ``(2) An action shall be deemed presented for purposes of paragraph 
(1) if it is--
            ``(A) in writing; and
            ``(B) received by the Department of State on or before 120 
        days after the date specified in paragraph (3) at--
                    ``(i) the headquarters of the Department of State 
                in Washington, D.C.; or
                    ``(ii) the Embassy of the United States of America 
                to Nicaragua.
    ``(3) The date to which paragraph (2) refers is a date after the 
enactment of this subsection that is specified by the Secretary of 
State, in the Secretary's discretion, in a notice published in the 
Federal Register.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 18, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as

adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of OPNET Technologies, Inc. (the
Company), I, Mel F. Wesley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 13, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mel F. Wesley                         
|                     |  |     |  | Mel F. Wesley                             
|                     |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
7.0% or more

6.0% to 6.9%5.0% to 5.9%4.0% to 4.9%3.9% or below

Unemployment Rate

Unemployment rates by county and disaster assistance elig

August 2005, not seasonally adjusted

(State rate = 5.2%; U.S. rate = 4.9%)

NOTE: The nine la

eligible for of Septemare eligible
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 30, 2010 of Stein Mart, Inc. (the Form 10-Q), I, David H. Stovall, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: December 8, 2010 |  | /s/ David H. Stovall, Jr.            
|                       |  | David H. Stovall, Jr.                
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



17
# 2017-DAFWgrp-event-sector

&8page &P of &N
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-108570, 333-111525, 333-115832, 333-145675 and 333-152612) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-42598, 333-42596, 333-42594, 333-124265, 333-137348, 333-141175,
333-145675 and 333-149720,) of Curis, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2009 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP         
|Boston, Massachusetts February 26, 2009
H. Res. 10

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 8, 2003.

Whereas in 2002, the Ohio State University Buckeyes football team captured its fifth undisputed collegiate national

football championship;

Whereas The Ohio State University is a member of the Big

Ten Conference of the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I–A and in 2002 was the Conference’s

champion for the 29th time in school history;

Whereas The Ohio State University’s 14–0 record in 2002 is

the best for a season for a Division I–A football team in

national college football history;

Whereas on the way to the national championship Ohio State

defeated five nationally ranked opponents, which included

a 14–9 triumph over the University of Michigan;

Whereas The Ohio State University entered the Fiesta Bowl

as an 11-point underdog to a University of Miami team

that was on a 34-game winning streak, yet emerged victorious;

Whereas Head Coach Jim Tressel has won five national college football championships, the 2002 championship

being his first Division I–A title and his first with The

Ohio State University;
2

•HRES 10 EH

Whereas Coach Tressel and his father Lee Tressel are the

only father-son combination to each win National Coach

of the Year honors and a national championship in football;

Whereas each player, coach, trainer, and manager dedicated

their time and effort to ensuring that the Buckeyes

reached the pinnacle of team achievement;

Whereas The Ohio State University Marching Band, and the

cheerleaders, students, alumni, faculty, and supporters of

The Ohio State University are to be congratulated for

their commitment and pride in the Buckeyes’ football

program; and

Whereas its five Division I–A football national championships

makes the Ohio State University football program among

the most successful in college football history: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) congratulates the Ohio State University football

team for winning the 2002 NCAA Division I–A collegiate football national championship;

(2) recognizes the achievements of all the players,

coaches, and support staff who were instrumental in

helping The Ohio State University win the 2002 NCAA

Division I–A collegiate football national championship

and invites them to the United States Capitol Building

to be honored;

(3) requests that the President recognize the accomplishments and achievements of the 2002 Ohio State
3

•HRES 10 EH

University football team and invite them to Washington,

D.C., for a White House ceremony for national championship teams; and

(4) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make available enrolled copies of this resolution

to The Ohio State University for appropriate display and

to transmit an enrolled copy of the resolution to each

coach and member of the 2002 NCAA Division I–A collegiate football national championship team.

Attest:

Clerk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0307 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. ROBERT MICHAEL ZERMENO,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 5, 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 28 2023

11/28/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0307
exhibit10-197.htm






  





  





 Exhibit 10.197





  








*** Confidential Portion has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment by the Company to, and the material has been separately filed with, the SEC.  Each omitted Confidential Portion is marked by three Asterisks.












FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE FULL-TIME-TRANSPONDER CAPACITY AGREEMENT (PRE-LAUNCH)












This Fourteenth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) (the “Fourteenth Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 7th day of June, 2011 by and between INTELSAT CORPORATION, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Intelsat”), and GCI COMMUNICATION CORP., an Alaskan corporation (“Customer”).







RECITALS







WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) dated as of March 31, 2006, as amended (collectively, the “Agreement”) between Intelsat and Customer, Intelsat is providing Customer with *** transponders on Galaxy 18; *** transponder on Galaxy 18; *** transponders on Horizons 1; and *** Transponder Segment on Horizon-1;







WHEREAS, Customer and Intelsat wish to amend the terms of the Agreement to modify the Capacity Term for certain of  *** Transponder Capacity on Galaxy 18.







AGREEMENT







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:








	
1.  

	
Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.













	
  

	
2.

	
Capacity Term.  The Capacity Term for the Galaxy 18 *** Transponder and the *** Capacity shall be extended for an additional *** period to ***.  The Monthly Fee for this extended Capacity Term shall remain the same.  In addition, the Capacity Term for the *** Transponder Capacity shall be reduced by ***, ending ***.













	
  

	
3.

	
Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed and delivered this Twelfth Amendment as of the day and year above written.












INTELSAT CORPORATION                                                                                                           GCI COMMUNICATION CORP.







By:           _/s/ Patricia Casey___                                                                                     By:  _/s/ Jimmy R. Sipes_________


Name:           __Patricia Casey_____                                                                                Name:  _Jimmy R. Sipes_________



	
Title:

	
_Senior VP and Deputy General Counsel_

	
Title:  _VP Network Services and Chief Engineer_
#### BROSIOUS v. PEPSI-COLA CO. et al.

Civ. No. 856.

District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

Feb. 5, 1943.

Miller Alanson Johnson, of Lewisburg, Pa., for plaintiff.

Snyder, Hull, Leiby & Metzger and Walter H. Compton, all of Harrisburg, Pa., and Arthur T. Vanderbilt, of Newark, N. J., for defendant Pepsi-Cola Co.

Cloyd Steininger, of Lewisburg, Pa., and Ritchie, Janney, Ober & Williams, of Baltimore, Md., for defendant Cloverdale Spring Co.

WATSON, District Judge.

On January 5, 1943, the plaintiff filed its motion for an order referring this matter to a special master for hearing and report. The motion alleges that the issues in this action are unusually complicated and will require the taking of much evidence and the examination of many documents. Objections were filed by the defendant, Pepsi-Cola Company, and bearing was had on the motion and obj ections.

From the hearing it appears that the alleged necessity for the appointment of a master arises only from the requirements of proof relative to damages sustained by the plaintiff. No demand having been made for a trial by jury, the plaintiff’s motion must be considered in the light of that portion of Rule 53(b), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, which reads as follows: “In actions to be tried without a jury, save in matters of account, a reference shall be made only upon a showing that some exceptional condition requires it.”

This action was brought under the provisions of 15 U.S.C.A. § 15. An examination of the allegations of the complaint clearly shows that there are no “exceptional” conditions requiring a reference to a master of the issues relative to liability on the part of either or both defendants. This leaves only the matter of damages as a proper issue for reference to a master. I feel that the orderly way to dispose of this case is to determine first whether or not there is liability on the part of these defendants and, if it is found that they are liable for such damages as the plaintiff may have sustained, then the issue relative to the amount of the damages suffered by the plaintiff may be submitted to a master if it is then found that there is necessity for. such reference. The case of Connecticut Importing Co. v. Frankfort Distilleries, D.C., 42 F.Supp. 225, which the plaintiff relies upon as supporting his motion, involves an entirely different situation. There the parties had been awarded a jury trial and the trial court found it advisable to refer the question of damages to a master prior to trial so that the jury might have the benefit of the master’s findings and conclusions. Here the issues are to be tried by the court without a jury, and there is nothing to indicate that anything would be gained by referring the question of damages to a master prior to the trial of the other issues.

The motion of the plaintiff for an order referring this matter to a special master be, and it is hereby, denied.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form
10-K of OPNET Technologies, Inc. (the Company), I, Marc A. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: June 14, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Marc A. Cohen
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Marc A. Cohen Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


10-K




| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.

|                     |  |                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2006 |  | By: /s/ Robert E. BiesRobert E. Bies
    Executive Vice-President and
    Chief Financial Officer