alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 143

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 121) to enhance the operation 

of the AMBER Alert communications network in order to facilitate 

the recovery of abducted children, to provide for enhanced notification 

on highways of alerts and information on such children, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2003

Mr. FROST (for himself and Mr. LAMPSON) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 121) to enhance 

the operation of the AMBER Alert communications network in order to facilitate the recovery of abducted children, to provide for enhanced notification on highways 

of alerts and information on such children, and for other 

purposes.

1 Resolved, That, immediately upon the adoption of this 

2 resolution, the House shall without intervention of any 

3 point of order consider in the House the bill (S. 121) to 

4 enhance the operation of the AMBER Alert communica5 tions network in order to facilitate the recovery of ab6 ducted children, to provide for enhanced notification on 
2

HRES 143 IH 

1 highways of alerts and information on such children, and 

2 for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read 

3 for amendment. The previous question shall be considered 

4 as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 

5 motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally 

6 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi7 nority member of the committee on the Judiciary; and (2) 

8 one motion to recommit.

Æ
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, D. Gary Fife, President and Chief Executive Officer of Big Bear Gold Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Big Bear Gold Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:
5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  June 24, 2004

/s/ D. Gary FifeD. Gary Fife, President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements Nos. 333-81504 and 333-4430 on Form S-8 of our reports dated June 6, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the change in method of accounting for
share-based payments to conform to Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share Based Payment), relating to the consolidated financial statements of OPNET Technologies, Inc. and managements report on
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of OPNET Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2007.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         
|McLean, Virginia         
|June 6, 2007
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 119

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science in the 

One Hundred Eighth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2003

Mr. BOEHLERT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Science in the One Hundred Eighth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Science (here4 after in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), 

5 including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be 

6 paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House of Rep7 resentatives for committee salaries and expenses, not more 

8 than $12,301,690 for the One Hundred Eighth Congress. 

9 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

10 Of the amount specified in section 1—
2

•HRES 119 IH 

1 (1) not more than $6,072,465 shall be available 

2 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

3 noon on January 3, 2003, and ending immediately 

4 before noon on January 3, 2004; and 

5 (2) not more than $6,229,225 shall be available 

6 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

7 noon on January 3, 2004, and ending immediately 

8 before noon on January 3, 2005. 

9 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

10 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

11 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

12 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

13 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

14 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

15 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

16 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

17 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of iPCS, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersignedcertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ TIMOTHY M. YAGER                                           |     |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------|
| *Timothy M. Yager, President and Chief Executive  Officer*     |     |
| March 16, 2007                                            |     |
| /s/  STEBBINS B. CHANDOR, JR.                             |     |   |
| *Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr., Executive Vice  President and* |     |
| *Chief Financial Officer*                                      | * * |
| March 16, 2007                                            |     |

 

----
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 07-1981 MUSA KARIM, Petitioner, v . MICHAEL MUKASEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent. ERRATA The Opinion issued on March 13, 2008 is amended as follows: Page 3, Lines 5, 8 and 10 should read "Karim".
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Wilfred Holder, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 717]

The credible evidence establishes that claimant, an unarmed security guard, was discharged from his employment after he reported to work under the influence of alcohol. “It is well settled that absent a showing that an employee is suffering from alcoholism, reporting to work under the influence of alcohol may constitute disqualifying misconduct” *(Matter of Kiteta [Commissioner of Labor],*4 AD3d 712, 713 [2004] [citations omitted]; *see Matter of Stuber [Commissioner of Labor],*32 AD3d 1063, 1063-1064 [2006]; *Matter of Kryszak [Commissioner of Labor],*308 AD2d 645, 646 [2003]). No such showing was made here. Although claimant contended that his slurred speech on the night in question was the product of medication he was taking, he conceded at the hearing that he provided no such explanation to the employer prior to his discharge and, further, failed to deny the employer’s repeated allegations of intoxication. Moreover, his belated explanations or denials presented a credibility issue for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve *(see Matter of Kiteta [Commissioner of Labor], 4*AD3d at 713).

Mercure, J.P., Feters, Carpinello, Rose and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
H. Res. 104

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 26, 2003.

Resolved, That the following named Members and Delegates be, and are hereby, elected to the following standing

committees of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Lucas of Kentucky

(to rank immediately after Mr. Boswell).

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Kind.

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: Ms. Norton (to

rank immediately after Mr. Ruppersberger).

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mrs. Christensen (to

rank immediately after Mr. Ryan of Ohio), Mr. Davis of Illinois (to rank immediately after Mrs. Christensen), Mr. Gonzalez (to rank immediately after Mr. Davis of Illinois), and

Ms. Majette (to rank immediately after Ms. Bordallo).

Attest:

Clerk.
#### SALOMON et al. v. ARMOUR & CO.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

May 8, 1903.)

1. Libel—Sufficiency of Complaint.

Tbe refusal of a debtor to pay bis creditor an item in dispute between them, and which the debtor claims he does not owe, does not justify the creditor in publishing of the debtor that he does not pay his debts, and a complaint by the debtor setting up such facts and such publication states a good cause of action for libel.

*343At Law. On demurrer to complaint.

Philip B. Adams, for demurrer.

Moses & Morris, opposed.

PLATT, District Judge.

It is not an ordinary harmless thing to publish of a merchant that he neglects and refuses to pay his debts when due. If one does such a thing maliciously, and with intent to injure the person spoken or written about, he ought to make full compensation, unless he can justify his action by proving the truth of the statement.

The complaint alleges, in substance, that the publication was false. There was no “admitted indebtedness.” The plaintiffs say that they tendered all that they owed. The question of privilege cannot- arise on the facts set forth in the complaint.

So far as now appears, the publication rather smacks of an attempt on the part of the defendant to apply the terrors of the blacklist as a punishment for the temerity of the plaintiffs in having presumed to differ from the defendant on a fact or on a point of bookkeeping. A number of interesting questions loom up above the horizon which ought to be submitted to a jury.

Let the demurrer be overruled.
**ICI MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY  INVESTMENT COMPANY BLANKET BOND  RIDER NO. 15**

 

| **INSURED**                     |                                       | **BOND NUMBER**               |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| **Saturna Capital Corporation** |                                       | **89265106B**                 |
| **EFFECTIVE DATE**              | **BOND PERIOD**                            | **AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE** |
| **May 22, 2007**                | **November 17, 2006 to November 17, 2007** | **/s/ Maggie Sullivan**       |

  In consideration of the premium charged for this Bond, it is hereby understood  and agreed that the   Limit of Liability for the following Insuring Agreements is hereby amended,  effective May 22,   2007 to be:

|                                                 | LIMIT OF LIABILITY |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
| Insuring Agreement A- FIDELITY                       | $1,735,000         |
| Insuring Agreement C- ON PREMISES                    | $1,735,000         |
| Insuring Agreement D- IN TRANSIT                     | $1,735,000         |
| Insuring Agreement E- FORGERY OR ALTERATION          | $1,735,000         |
| Insuring Agreement F- SECURITIES                     | $1,735,000         |
| Insuring Agreement G- COUNTERFEIT CURRENCY           | $1,735,000         |
| Insuring Agreement I- PHONE/ELECTRONIC TRANSACATIONS | $1,735,000         |
| Insuring Agreement J- COMPUTER SECURITY              | $1,735,000         |

Except as above stated, nothing herein shall be held to alter, waive or extend  any of the terms of  this Bond.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 13

- 00258

- CV

R. P., Appellant

v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY NO. 18,072, THE HONO RABLE JOE CARROLL, J UDGE PR ESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant R.P. filed her notice of appeal on April 3, 2013 . The appellate record was

complete May 9, 2013 , making appellant ’ s brief due May 29, 2013

. On May 31, 2013 , counsel for

appellant filed a motion for extension of ti me to file appellant’s brief.

Recent amendments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final

disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a),

available at http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/MiscDocket/12/12903200.pdf (providing 180 days

for court ’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order counsel to file appellant ’ s brief no later

than June 19, 2013 . If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he

should not be held in contempt of court.It is ordered on Ju ne 3 , 2013

.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
H. Res. 201

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 4, 2003.

Whereas over 216,931 members of the reserve components of

the Armed Forces have been called to leave their families

and their jobs, in service to this country and her citizens;

Whereas businesses of every size and scope have been impacted as their employees who are members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces have been called

away from their employment in local business and industry;

Whereas businesses across the Nation have been exceptionally

accommodating to the unique demands on the time, resources, and responsibilities of employee spouses and

families of active duty military personnel who have been

deployed for service; and

Whereas business owners have made sacrifices so that they

might ensure observance of the letter and the spirit of

the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment

Rights Act in many ways including: restoring employment status after military service obligation has been fulfilled, providing continuation of health benefits to active

duty employees and their dependents, and committing

uninterrupted pension and retirement benefits: Now,

therefore, be it
2

•HRES 201 EH

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that—

(1) the businesses that establish the backbone of

our Nation in times of peace and rise to a greater standard of resolve in times of challenge do so by—

(A) carrying on the good work of commerce,

industry, and innovation; and

(B) steadfastly supporting the members of our

military and their families; and

(2) the business owners of our Nation deserve our

commendation and sincere expression of gratitude.

Attest:

Clerk.
|                                                                  |                    |                    | Page 26
|----------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------
|                                                                  |                    |                    |        
|NORTHEAST BANCORP                                                 |                   
|Exhibit 11. Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings |                   
|                                                                  |                    |                    |        
|                                                                  | Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended |        
|                                                                  | September 30, 2005 | September 30, 2004 |        
|EQUIVALENT SHARES:                                                |                    |                    |        
|                                                                  |                    |                    |        
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                               | 2,522,653          | 2,525,346          |        
|                                                                  |                    |                    |        
|Total Diluted Shares                                              | 2,552,351          | 2,568,703          |        
|                                                                  |                    |                    |        
|Net Income                                                        | $ 
  1,042,097     | $  
  956,116      |        
|                                                                  |                    |                    |        
|Basic Earnings Per Share                                          | $          
  0.41 | $        
  0.38   |        
|                                                                  |                    |                    |        
|Diluted Earnings Per Share                                        | $          
  0.41 | $        
  0.37   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,768,000
<SECURITIES>                                36,724,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,110,000
<PP&E>                                      11,180,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,801,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,480,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,124,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,085,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,480,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,801,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,121,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,266,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,266,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,266,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.05)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

         (Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Three Months Ended                                  Nine Months Ended
                             ----------------------------------             -------------------------------------

                             July 5, 1997         June 29, 1996             July 5, 1997            June 29, 1996
                             ------------         -------------             ------------            -------------
<S>                          <C>                  <C>                       <C>                      <C>                           
Average shares                                                                              
outstanding                   13,137,999           13,660,755                 13,135,333               13,904,896
                                                                                            
Net income                   $     5,283          $     3,881                $     7,946              $     4,605
                             ===========          ===========                ===========              ============
Earnings                                                                                    
per share of                                                                                
common stock                 $       .40          $       .28                $       .60              $      0.33
                             ===========          ===========                ===========              ===========
</TABLE>                                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
The dilutive effect of stock options, calculated using the treasury stock
method, was less than 1.5% during all periods presented.
#### In the Matter of Jason J.M., Appellant. Cayuga County Attorney, Respondent.

[852 NYS2d 885]

*1250Memorandum: On appeal from an order adjudging him to be a juvenile delinquent and placing him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services, respondent contends that the petition is not in compliance with Family Court Act § 311.2 (3). Petitioner has submitted a letter to this Court consenting to the dismissal of the petition, which is the relief sought by respondent. We therefore grant that relief. Present—Smith, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Green, JJ.