alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      12.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I,
      Tzvika
      Friedman, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Alvarion Ltd.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:




a.
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b.
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




c.
      Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      company’s internal control over financial reporting, and




5.
      The
      company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of
      company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a.
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and




b.
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the company’s internal controls over financial
      reporting.






Date:
              May 11,
              2006By:
            /s/ Tzvika
              FriedmanTzvika
              Friedman
              Chief
                Executive Officer
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Teodoro Miguel Hernandez, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00167

- CR v. The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 428th District Court of Hays County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR

- 14

- 0339 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.
As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, w e reverse t he trial court’s judgment
convictin g Hernandez of and sentencing him for the crime of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and, in lieu of that judgment, render a judgment convicting Hernandez o f the lesser

included offense of assault. Further, we remand this matter to the trial court for a new punishment hearing for the offense of assault. We affirm the trial court’s judgment of conviction as to the
offense of sexual assault in all respects

. We note that the appellant, Teodoro Miguel Hernandez, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 5, 2016 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    20457
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (978)
<INVENTORY>                                      22628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 43551
<PP&E>                                           29407
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4509)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   77196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            58461
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      16770
<COMMON>                                          2379
<OTHER-SE>                                         293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     77196
<SALES>                                         108867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                108867
<CGS>                                            93401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   108864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    95
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3604)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       117
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3721)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3721)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.67)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2010 of Stein Mart, Inc. (the Form 10-Q), I,
Gregory W. Kleffner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 8, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Gregory W. Kleffner                             
|                        |  |  |  | Gregory W. Kleffner                                 
|                        |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



18
[No. 24196-3-III.

Division Three.

November 15, 2005.]

#### Edward S. Carlson et al., *Appellants,*v. Reliance National Indemnity Company et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 03-2-02297-1, Michael P. Price, J., entered October 8, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kato C.J., concurred in by Brown, J., and Thompson, J. Pro Tern.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 562 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 562

    To suspend temporarily the duty on thermal release plastic film.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on thermal release plastic film.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THERMAL RELEASE PLASTIC FILM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.39.19    Thermal release   Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     plastic film                                                            31/2004          ''
                     (with a                                                                                   .
                     substrate of
                     polyolefin-
                     based: PET/
                     conductive
                     acrylic
                     polymer;
                     release liner
                     of polyethylene
                     terephthalate;
                     PET/
                     polysiloxane;
                     pressure
                     sensitive
                     adhesive of
                     acrylic ester-
                     based
                     copolymer; and
                     core of
                     acrylonitrile-
                     butadiene-
                     styrene
                     copolymer)
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     3919.10.20)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 142 (Monday, July 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17754]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of June 
23 and 24, 2009

    In accordance with Sec.  271.25 of its rules regarding availability 
of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic 
policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its 
meeting held on June 23 and 24, 2009.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\[thinsp]Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market 
Committee at its meeting held on June 23 and 24, 2009, which 
includes the domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are 
available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal 
Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551. The minutes are published in 
the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's annual report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial 
conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable 
growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee 
seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds 
trading in a range of 0 to \1/4\ percent. The Committee directs the 
Desk to purchase agency debt, agency MBS, and longer-term Treasury 
securities during the intermeeting period with the aim of providing 
support to private credit markets and economic activity. The timing and 
pace of these purchases should depend on conditions in the markets for 
such securities and on a broader assessment of private credit market 
conditions. The Committee anticipates that the combination of outright 
purchases and various liquidity facilities outstanding will cause the 
size of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet to expand significantly in 
coming months. The Desk is expected to purchase up to $200 billion in 
housing-related agency debt by the end of this year. The Desk is 
expected to purchase up to $1.25 trillion of agency MBS by the end of 
the year. The Desk is expected to purchase up to $300 billion of 
longer-term Treasury securities by the end of the third quarter. The 
System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the 
Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's 
balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the 
Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.
    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, July 17, 2009.

Brian F. Madigan,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-17754 Filed 7-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
[No. 22871-1-III.

Division Three.

November 22, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Sariah L. Williams, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Walla Walla County, No. 03-1-00408-9, Robert L. Zagelow, J., entered March 29, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Kato, C.J., and Sweeney, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BRYNELL MCFARLAND,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-12-00217-CR

Appeal from the

363rd District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC# F-0872946-W)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the judgment of 

conviction should be modified to reflect that: (1) Appellant entered a plea of not true to each of 

the violations alleged in the State’s Amended Motion to Revoke Probation or Proceed with an 

Adjudication of Guilt filed on March 28, 2012; (2) the trial court found to be true allegations four 

through twelve of the State’s Amended Motion to Revoke Probation or Proceed with an 

Adjudication of Guilt filed on March 28, 2012; (3) Appellant did not enter a plea bargain with 

respect to the State’s motion to adjudicate; and (4) Assistant District Attorney Brian Poe 

represented the State during the April 27, 2012, adjudication proceedings. We therefore affirm 

the trial court’s judgment as modified. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2014.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
1 The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-1338

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Rusty Eugene McCoy, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 5, 2007 Filed: February 5, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Rusty McCoy pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a )(2). Finding that McCoy was an armed career criminal, the district court 1 sentenced him to the statutory minimum of 15 years in prison. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1); U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4. On appeal, McCoy challenges one of the predicate offenses underlying his armed-career-criminal status, arguing that aiding and abetting felony theft of a vehicle in violation of Kansas law should not automatically be deem ed a “violent felony.” See 18 U.S.C.-2- § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) (defining “violent felony” as a crime that is punishable by more than one year in prison and “otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another”). Rev iewing de novo, seeUnited States v. Mincks , 409 F.3d 898, 900 (8th Cir. 2005), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 1345 (2006), we conclude that McCoy’s cha llenge is unavailing. SeeUnited States v. Barbour , 395 F.3d 826, 827-28 (8th Cir.) ( under controlling precedent, Kansas vehicle theft is violent felony within meaning of § 924(e)), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 133 (2005). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

KEITH OSHAY REYNOLDS

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00 096

- C R

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20090D0 2381 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Keith Oshay Reynolds is attempting to appeal his two drug

- related convictions. Because

he did not file a timely notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal.

On April 17, 2013, Appellant filed his notice of appeal in the trial court . The district clerk

forwarded the not ice to this Court and also provided this Cour t with a docketing certificate

indicating that Appellant was convicted and sentenced on October 12, 2012. After receiving

these documents, this Court filed Appellant’s notice of appeal on April 18, 2013. That same day,

the clerk of this Court mailed a letter to Appellant, advising him that she had filed his notice of

appeal. The clerk further advised Appellant of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal did not appear to be timely. The clerk informed

Appellant that unless he could show grounds for continuing the appeal within ten days, the appeal2

could be dismissed without further notice. To this date, Appellant has not responded to the

clerk’s letter. A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Olivo v.

State

, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). Because there is no indication that a motion

for new trial was filed, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed on November 12, 2012

–

thirty days after the day sentence was imposed in open court. 1 See T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.2(a); see also

T EX .R.A PP .P. 4.1(a) (providing that if the last day of a period falls on a weekend or a legal holiday,

the period extends to the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday). To obtain an

extension of time to file the notice of appeal, Appellant was required to file both the notice of

appeal and a motion for extension of time within fifteen days of the due date. See T EX .R.A P P .P.

26.3. Appellant did not comply with this procedure. His notice of appeal, received in this Court

on April 18, 2013 , was not timely. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

May 15, 2013

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

1 November 11, 2012 fell on Sunday.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,262,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,604,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                   321,733
<INVENTORY>                                  2,303,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,070,488
<PP&E>                                       2,314,083
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,532,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,533,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,670,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       127,190
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,694,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,533,748
<SALES>                                     10,926,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,926,417
<CGS>                                        7,325,650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,256,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (42,132)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                251,333
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            248,183
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   248,183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         182,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,736,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    953,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,979,108
<PP&E>                                       9,532,708
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,023,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,742,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,834,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,736,124
<COMMON>                                           716
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,742,156
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               500,577
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,692,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,238,878)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,238,878)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)


</TABLE>