alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7002
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GHULAM MOHAMMED NASIM, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR88-378-HM, CA-96-777-S) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: March 24, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no revers ible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nasim , Nos. CR88-378-HM; CA-96-777-S (D. Md. May 22, 1996). Appellant's motion to remand to the district court is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FOURTH D I VI SI ON BA RNES, P. J. , RA Y and M CM I LLI A N, JJ.

N O T IC E : M otions for r e c ons i de r a tion m us t be ph y sic a l ly r e ce iv ed i n our c le r k ’s offic e w ithin te n da y s of the da te of de c is ion to be de e m ed tim e ly file d.

http://w w w .ga a ppe a ls .us /r ule s /
Jul y 13, 2015
NOT TO BE OFFI CI A LLY REPORTED



# I n th e Co u r t o f

A p p eals o f

G eo r g ia

A1 5 A0 26 4 . M A

NTON etal . v . FIRST BANK OF DALTON.

R A Y , J u d g e.
In t h i s cas e, t he fo l l o wi n g ci rcu m s t an ces ex is t an d are d is po s i t i ve o f t h e ap p eal : (1 ) Th e ev i den ce s up p o rt s t h e ju d g m en t ; (2 ) No rev ers ib l e err o r o f l aw ap p ears , an d an o p i n io n wo u l d h av e n o
p reced en t i al v al u e; (3 ) Th e ju d g m en t o f t h e co u rtb el ow ad eq u at el y ex p l ai n s t h e d eci si on ; an d (4 ) Th e i s s u es are co n t ro l l ed ad v ers el y t o th e ap p el lan t fo r t h e reas o n s an d

au t h o ri t y g i v en in t h e ap p el l ee’ s b ri ef.
Th e ju d g m en t o f t h e co u rt b el o w t herefo re i s affi rm ed i n acco rd an ce wi t h Co u rt

o f Ap peal s Ru le 3 6

. Ju d gmen t a f f i r m ed. Ba r nes , P. J., a n d

McMi l l ia n , J., co n cu r
.
# cpsaat25
EXHIBIT 32.1


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Whittier Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Bryce W. Rhodes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael B. Young,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certifies for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
Untied States Code, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: April 28, 2004                      /s/ Bryce W. Rhodes
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Bryce W. Rhodes, President, CEO and
                                           Director


                                           /s/ Michael B. Young
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael B. Young, Chief Financial
                                           Officer, Treasurer and Controller
Exhibit
      13





302
      CERTIFICATION





I,
      Don
      Perks, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify
      that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 20F of Global Immune Technologies
      Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures,
      as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14 and 15d - 14, for the registrant
      and
      have:


-
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within
      those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
      is
      being prepared;


-
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the
“Evaluation Date”); and


-
      presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date.





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
      and
      the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors or persons performing
      the equivalent functions:


-
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls; and


-
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a role in the registrant's internal controls.





6.
      I have
      indicated in this annual report whether there were changes in internal controls
      or in other factors that could affect internal controls subsequent to the date
      of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
      to
      deficiencies and material weaknesses.





/s/ Don
      Perks


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





Date:
      September 30, 2005





End
      of
      Filing
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 8, 2015

NO. 03-13-00783-CV

Juan Pablo Mayorga, Appellant

v.

Maria Mayorga, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART –

OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgments signed by the trial court on August 23, 2013, and October 25, 

2013. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was 

reversible error in the portion of the August 23 judgment that values the Guanajuato property at 

80,960 pesos and the portion that makes specific money awards for the mortgage, insurance,

appraisal fees, repair, and maintenance on the homestead property appellee paid from the time the 

temporary orders were signed through closing. Therefore, the Court reverses those portions of the 

trial court’s August 23 judgment and remands those issues for further consideration and clarification 

by the district court. However, we affirm the portion of the August 23 judgment that awards 

appellee $1,000 in attorney’s fees. The Court further vacates the portion of the October 25 order 

that awards sanctions against appellant. Each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred by that 

party, both in this Court and the court below.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Form
10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.






Date:  November
      6, 2009
              
              /s/ Harvey J. Berger,
M.DHarvey
      J. Berger, M.D.Chairman
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  November
      6, 2009
              
              /s/ Edward M. FitzgeraldEdward
      M. FitzgeraldSenior
      Vice President,Chief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  34
# Table 1

# Table 2

# Table 3

# Table 4

# Table 5

# Table 6

# Table 7

# Table 8

# Table 9

# Table 10

# Table 11

# Table 12

# Table 13

# Table 14

# Table 15

# Table 16

# Table 17

# Table 18

# Table 19

# Table 20

# Table 21

# Table 22

# Table 23

# Table 24

# Table 25

# Table 26
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-3489EA

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Jose Sotero Vasquez-Ferreira, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: March 11, 1997 Filed: May 13, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, HEANEY, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Jose Sotero Vasquez-Ferreira worked as a van driver for a company that offered transportation from South Tex as to other parts of the country. During one of his trips, Vasq uez-Ferreira

was arrested by undercover Border Patrol officers after he tried t o collect a fare for bringing two illegal aliens to Lit tle Rock, Arkansas. The Government charged Vasquez-Ferreira with conspiracyto transport, and two counts of transporting an illegal alie n. See 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) (1994); 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1994). A jury convicted Vasquez-Ferreira on all the charges, and he appeals. We affirm.-2-

Vasquez-Ferreira contend s the evidence was insufficient to show he knowingly transported illegal aliens. Viewing the record in th e light most favorable to the verdict, we disagree. At least twice on the road to Little Rock, Vasquez-Ferreira was within hearing distance when the passengers told Vas quez-Ferreira’s driving partner that they ha d no immigration papers. See United States v. Hernandez , 913 F.2d 568, 569-7 0 (8t h Cir. 1990). Additionally, Vasquez-Ferreira acknowledged his passengers wer e illegal aliens when he was explaining the trip’s cost to the underc over officers. Relying on United States v. Medina -Garcia , 918 F.2d 4, 6-8 (1st Cir. 1990), Vasquez-Ferreira also contends the Governm ent failed to establish that one of his passengers was in the Un itedStates illegally. According to Vasquez-Ferreira, the undercover officer s authori zed the passenger’s entry from Mexico after he volunteered to help infiltrate a large smuggling operation. Because Vasquez-Ferreira failed to raise this issue in the district court, we will not consider it on appe al. See United States v. Flaherty , 76 F.3d 967, 973 (8th Cir. 1996). Besides, unlike the governme nt informant in Medina-Garcia , the passenger neither had a prearranged role in the Border Patrol’s sting operation nor had been granted any l egal status to live and work in the United States. See 918 F.2d at 6-8. We thus affirm Vasquez-Ferreira’s convictions.
A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the filing by Rush Financial Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company")  of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2004 (the  "Report"),  I, Randy  Rutledge,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
                    13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
               2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects,  the financial  condition and results
                    of operation of the Company.




                                                  /s/ Randy Rutledge
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Randy Rutledge
                                                  Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  May 20, 2004





                                       30
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 788

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT

To revise the boundary of the Glen Canyon National 

Recreation Area in the States of Utah and Arizona.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 788 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Glen Canyon National 

3 Recreation Area Boundary Revision Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GLEN CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA 

5 BOUNDARY REVISION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first section of Public Law 

7 92–593 (16 U.S.C. 460dd; 86 Stat. 1311) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘That in’’ and inserting ‘‘SEC9 TION 1. (a) In’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(b) In addition to the boundary change authority 

12 under subsection (a), the Secretary may acquire approxi13 mately 152 acres of private land in exchange for approxi14 mately 370 acres of land within the boundary of Glen Can15 yon National Recreation Area, as generally depicted on the 

16 map entitled ‘Page One Land Exchange Proposal’, num17 ber 608/60573a–2002, and dated May 16, 2002. The map 

18 shall be on file and available for public inspection in the 

19 appropriate offices of the National Park Service. Upon 

20 conclusion of the exchange, the boundary of the recreation 

21 area shall be revised to reflect the exchange.’’. 

22 (b) CHANGE IN ACREAGE CEILING.—Such section is 

23 further amended by striking ‘‘one million two hundred and 
3

HR 788 RFS 

1 thirty-six thousand eight hundred and eighty acres’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘1,256,000 acres’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 25, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
[No. 31971-3-II.

Division Two.

October 18, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Vance Warren Sackett, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 03-1-05914-7, Rosanne Buckner J., entered July 13, 2004. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Van Deren, A.C.J.; Hunt, J., dissenting.
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 NOTE 
  

			
	$65,000,000	  	March 7, 2013

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to BANK OF
AMERICA, N.A., or registered assigns (the “Lender”), in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement (as hereinafter defined), the lesser of the principal sum of SIXTY-FIVE MILLION AND NO/00 DOLLARS ($65,000,000) or the aggregate
unpaid principal amount of all Loans from time to time made by the Lender to the Borrower under that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2013 (as amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from time to
time, the “Agreement;” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among the Borrower, Landmark Apartment Trust of America, Inc., and certain subsidiaries of the Borrower from time to time party thereto, as
guarantors, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent. 
 The Borrower
promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Loan from the date of such Loan until such principal amount is paid in full, at such interest rates and at such times as provided in the Agreement. All payments of principal and
interest shall be made to the Administrative Agent for the account of the Lender in Dollars in immediately available funds at the Administrative Agent’s Office. If any amount is not paid in full when due hereunder, such unpaid amount shall bear
interest, to be paid upon demand, from the due date thereof until the date of actual payment (and before as well as after judgment) computed at the per annum rate set forth in the Agreement. 

This Note is one of the Notes referred to in the Agreement, is entitled to the benefits thereof and may be prepaid in whole or in part
subject to the terms and conditions provided therein. This Note is secured by the Collateral Documents and is also entitled to the benefits of the Guaranty. Upon the occurrence and continuation of one or more of the Events of Default specified in
the Agreement, all amounts then remaining unpaid on this Note shall become, or may be declared to be, immediately due and payable all as provided in the Agreement. Loans made by the Lender shall be evidenced by one or more loan accounts or records
maintained by the Lender in the ordinary course of business. The Lender may also attach schedules to this Note and endorse thereon the date, amount and maturity of its Loans and payments with respect thereto. 

The Borrower, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby waives diligence, presentment, protest and demand and notice of protest,
demand, dishonor and non-payment of this Note. 







 THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW
YORK. 
  

							
	LANDMARK APARTMENT TRUST OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, LP
		
	By:	 	Landmark Apartment Trust of America, Inc., its general partner
			
		 	By:	 	/s/ Stanley J. Olander, Jr.
				
		 		 	Name:	 	Stanley J. Olander, Jr.
		 		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 99.2



                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

              -----------------------------------------------------

                   CHASE CREDIT CARD OWNER TRUST SERIES 2000-1

              -----------------------------------------------------



         The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, as Administrator pursuant to the Indenture for the Chase
Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2000-1 does hereby certify that:

                  1. The undersigned is an Authorized Officer pursuant to the
                  Indenture to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
                  Indenture Trustee.

                  2. This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.9 of
                  the Indenture.

                  3. A review of the activities of the Issuer during the period
                  from the closing date until December 31, 2000, and of
                  performance under this Indenture has been made under the
                  supervision of the undersigned.

                  4. To the best of the undersigned knowledge, based on such
                  review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and
                  covenants in all material respects under this Indenture
                  throughout the period from the closing date until December 31,
                  2000. No default in the compliance of any such condition or
                  covenant has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in
                  paragraph 5 below.

                  5. The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Issuer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Indenture known to the undersigned to have been made
                  during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature
                  of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Issuer, if
                  any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
                  of each such default: NONE.

                                                 (signatures on following page)


<PAGE>



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 28th
day of March, 2001.

                             By CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, National
                             Association, as Administrator




                             By:  /s/ Keith Schuck
                                  --------------------------
                             Name:  Keith Schuck
                             Title: Senior Vice President