36706 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices 

Wyoming: WYG589### This permit 

covers the Wind River Reservation; any 

land within the State of Wyoming held 

in trust by the United States for an 

Indian tribe; and any other areas within 

the State of Wyoming which are Indian 

country within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 

1151. 

Coverage under the general permits 

will be limited to lagoon systems 

treating primarily domestic wastewater 

and will include the following three 

categories: (1) Lagoons where no 

permission is required before starting to 

discharge; (2) lagoons where permission 

is required before starting to discharge; 

and (3) lagoons that are required to have 

no discharge. The effluent limitations 

for lagoons coming under categories 1 

and 2 are based on the Federal 

Secondary Treatment Regulation (40 

CFR Part 133) and best professional 

judgement (BPJ). There are provisions in 

the general permits for adjusting the 

effluent limitations on total suspended 

solids (TSS) and pH in accordance with 

the provisions of the Secondary 

Treatment Regulation. If more stringent 

and/or additional effluent limitations 

are considered necessary to comply 

with applicable water quality standards, 

etc., those limitations may be imposed 

by written notification to the permittee. 

Lagoon systems under category 3 are 

required to have no discharge except in 

accordance with the bypass provisions 

of the permit. Self-monitoring 

requirements and routine inspection 

requirements are included in the 

permits. The permits do not authorize 

the discharge of wastewater from land 

application sites, but they do require 

that the land application of wastewater 

from the lagoon systems be done in 

accordance with a written operational 

plan for the land application of the 

wastewater. The objectives of the 

operational plan are to minimize the 

potential for the discharge of wastewater 

from the land application site and to 

avoid applying excessive amounts of 

nitrogen to the land application site. 

With the exception of the Flathead 

Indian Reservation, the Fort Peck Indian 

Reservation, Northern Cheyenne Indian 

Reservation, and the Ute Mountain 

Indian Reservation, where the Tribes 

have Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) 

certification authority, EPA intends to 

certify that the permits comply with the 

applicable provisions of the Clean Water 

Act as long as the permittees comply 

with all permit conditions. The permits 

will be issued for a period of five years, 

with the permit effective date and 

expiration date determined at the time 

of issuance. 

Other Legal Requirements 

Economic Impact (Executive Order 

12866): EPA has determined that the 

issuance of this general permit is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

the terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 

FR 51735 (October 4, 1993)) and is 

therefore not subject to formal OMB 

review prior to proposal. 

Paperwork Reduction Act: EPA has 

reviewed the requirements imposed on 

regulated facilities in these proposed 

general permits under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 501, et 

seq. The information collection 

requirements of these permits have 

already been approved by the Office of 

Management and Budget in submissions 

made for the NPDES permit program 

under the provisions of the Clean Water 

Act. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act: 

Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act (UMRA), Public Law 104–4, 

generally requires Federal agencies to 

assess the effects of their ‘‘regulatory 

actions’’ defined to be the same as 

‘‘rules’’ subject to the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA)) on tribal, state, 

local governments and the private 

sector. Since the permit proposed today 

is an adjudication, it is not subject to the 

RFA and is therefore not subject to the 

requirements of the UMRA. 

Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 

1251, et seq. 

Dated: July 17, 2009. 

Debra H. Thomas, 

Acting Assistant Regional Administrator, 

Office of Partnerships and Regulatory 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–17708 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8595–6] 

Environmental Impacts Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–1399 or http://www.epa.gov/ 

compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact 

Statements 

Filed 07/13/2009 Through 07/17/2009 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

EIS No. 20090244, Draft EIS, BLM, CA, 

Santa Ana River Wash Land Use Plan 

Amendment and Land Exchange 

Project, Proposes to Exchange Land 

Located within Upper Santa Ana 

River Wash, for District-Owned Lands 

in San Bernardino County, CA, 

Comment Period Ends: 09/08/2009, 

Contact: Michael Bennett 760–833– 

7139. 

EIS No. 20090245, Draft EIS, FHW, FL, 

Interstate 395 (I–395) Development 

and Environment Study Project, From 

I–95 to West Channel Bridges of the 

MacArthur Causeway at Biscayne 

Bay, City of Miami, Miami-Dade 

County, FL, Comment Period Ends: 

09/08/2009, Contact: Linda Anderson 

850–942–9650 Ext 3053. 

EIS No. 20090246, Draft EIS, AFS, CA, 

Eddy Gulch Late-Successional 

Reserve Fuels/Habitat Protection 

Project, To Protect Late-Successional 

Habitat used by the Northern Spotted 

Owl and Other Late-SuccessionalDependent Species, Salmon River and 

Scott River Ranger District, Klamath 

National Forest, Siskiyou County, CA, 

Comment Period Ends: 09/08/2009, 

Contact: Connie Hendryx 530–468– 

1281. 

EIS No. 20090247, Draft EIS, NOA, 00, 

Comprehensive Ecosystem-Base 

Amendment 1 (CE–BA 1) for the 

South Atlantic Region, 

Implementation,, Comment Period 

Ends: 09/08/2009, Contact: Roy E. 

Crabtree, PhD 727–824–5305. 

EIS No. 20090248, Final EIS, AFS, OR, 

Farley Vegetation Management 

Project, To Conduct Timber Harvest 

Commercial and Non-Commercial 

Thinning, Fuels Treatment Prescribed 

Burning and Reforestation, Desolation 

Creek, North Fork John Day Ranger 

District, Umatilla National Forest, 

Grant County, OR, Wait Period Ends: 

08/24/2009, Contact: Janel McCurdy 

541–278–3869. 

EIS No. 20090249, Draft EIS, NOA, 00, 

Amendment 3 to the 2006 

Consolidated Atlantic Highly 

Migratory Species (HMS), Fishery 

Management Plan, To Implement 

Management Measures that Prevent 

Overfishing and Rebuild Overfished 

Stocks, Implementation, Comment 

Period Ends: 09/21/2009, Contact: 

Margo Schulze-Haugen 301–713– 

2347. 

Amended Notices 

EIS No. 20090134, Draft EIS, COE, CA, 

Newhall Ranch Resource Management 

and Development Plan (RMDP) and 

the Spineflower Conservation Plan 

(SCP), Implementation, Portion of 

Santa Clara River Valley, Los Angeles 

County, CA, Comment Period Ends: 

08/25/2009, Contact: Aaron O. Allen 

805–585–2154. 

Revision to FR Notice Published 05/01/ 

2009: Extending Comment Period 

from 06/29/2009 to 08/25/2009. 

EIS No. 20090177, Draft EIS, AFS, CA, 

Lassen National Forest, Motorized 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 141 / Friday, July 24, 2009 / Notices 36707 

Travel Management Plan, 

Implementation, Butte, Lassen, 

Modoc, Plumas, Shasta, Siskiyou, 

Tehama Counties, CA, Comment 

Period Ends: 07/31/2009, Contact: 

Christopher O’Brien 530–257–2151. 

Revision of FR Notice Published on 

06/05/2009; Comment Review Period 

extended from 7/20/2009 to 7/31/ 

2009. 

EIS No. 20090181, Draft EIS, AFS, CA, 

Lower Trinity and Mad River 

Motorized Travel Management, 

Proposed to Prohibit Cross-County 

Motor Vehicle Travel Off Designated 

National Forest Transportation 

System (NFTS) Roads and Motorized 

Trails, Six River National Forest, CA, 

Comment Period Ends: 08/04/2009, 

Contact: Leslie Burkhart 707–441– 

3520 Revision to FR Notice Published 

06/05/2009: Extending Comment 

Period from 07/20/2009 to 08/04/ 

2009. 

Dated: July 21, 2009. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E9–17703 Filed 7–23–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8595–7] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments Availability of EPA 

Comments Prepared Pursuant to the 

Environmental Review Process (ERP), 

Under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act 

and Section 102(2)(c) of the National 

Environmental Policy Act as Amended 

Requests for copies of EPA comments 

can be directed to the Office of Federal 

Activities at 202–564–7146. An 

explanation of the ratings assigned to 

draft environmental impact statements 

(EISs) was published in FR dated July 

17, 2009 (74 FR 34754). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20090011, ERP No. D–SFW– 

K99041–CA, Tehachapi Uplands 

Multiple Species Habitat 

Conservation Plan (TUMSHCP), 

Propose Issuance of a 50-Year 

Incidental Take Permit for 27 Federaland State-Listed and Unlisted 

Species, Kern County, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about impacts 

to aquatic resources and to California 

condor. EPA recommended additional 

information for air quality, induced 

growth, transportation, visual and 

cumulative impacts. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20090091, ERP No. D–FRC– 

D05126–VA, Smith Mountain 

Pumped Storage Project (FERC No. 

2210–169). Application for 

Hydropower License to continue 

Operating the 636-megawatt Pumped 

Storage Project, Roanoke River, 

Bedford, Campbell, Franklin and 

Pittsylvania Counties, VA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about water 

temperature changes, the adaptive 

management process, and wetland 

impacts, and requested that a fish 

passage option be explored, and an 

environmental monitor be used. Rating 

EC2. 

EIS No. 20090126, ERP No. D–FHW– 

E40825–NC, Monroe Connector/ 

Bypass Project, Construction from 

Near I–485 at US &4 to US 74 between 

the Tons of Wingate and Marshville, 

Funding and US COE 404 Permit, 

North Carolina Turnpike Authority, 

Meckleburg and Union Counties, NC. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental objections about air and 

water quality impacts. EPA believes that 

this project will contribute additional 

VMTs and increased emissions and 

ultimately make achievement of the 

NAAQS less likely. Jurisdictional waters 

of the U.S. are currently impaired in the 

project study area from construction and 

related activities. Rating EO2. 

EIS No. 20090142, ERP No. D–NPS– 

K61170–CA, Yosemite National Park 

Project, Construction of Yosemite 

Institute Environment Education 

Campus, Implementation, Mariposa 

County, CA. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project, but requested 

additional information regarding 

applicability of Clean Air Act general 

conformity. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20090144, ERP No. D–GSA– 

K40271–CA, San Ysidro Land Port of 

Entry (LPOE) Improvement Project, 

Propose the Configuration and 

Expansion of the Existing (LPOE), San 

Ysidro, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about air 

quality impacts and recommended 

additional operational air quality 

analysis and measures to reduce 

congestion and emissions, including 

anti-idling methods. EPA also 

recommended environmental justice 

analysis of port facility users and 

improvements to intermodal 

accessibility. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20090155, ERP No. D–BIA– 

C65008–NY, Cayuga Indian Nation of 

New York Conveyance of Land into 

Trust Project, Approval of a 125 + 

Acre Fee-To-Trust Property Transfer 

of Seven Separate Parcel located in 

the Village of Union Springs and 

Town of Springport and Montezuma 

in Cayuga County and the Town of 

Seneca Falls in Seneca County, NY. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about the traffic 

analysis and related air quality impacts. 

Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20090160, ERP No. D–AFS– 

F65075–MN, Border Project, 

Proposing Forest Vegetation 

Management and Related 

Transportation System Activities, 

LaCroix Ranger District, Superior 

National Forest, St. Louis County, 

MN. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20090086, ERP No. DA–GSA– 

D81027–MD, U.S. Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) Headquarters 

Consolidation, Master Plan Update, 

Federal Research Center at White Oak, 

Silver Spring, Montgomery County, 

MD. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed action. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20090150, ERP No. DR–FHW– 

F40445–IN, I–69 Evansville to 

Indianapolis, Indiana Project, Section 

2, Revised to Update the Stream 

Impacts, Oakland City to Washington, 

(IN–64 to US 50), Gibson, Pike and 

Daviess Counties, IN. 

Summary: While EPA has no 

objection to the proposed action, it 

requested clarification of mitigation 

measures for wetlands, streams, upland 

forests, and clean diesel construction 

practices. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20090166, ERP No. DS–COE– 

G34030–LA, Calcasieu River and Pass, 

Louisiana Dredged Material 

Management Plan, Implementation, 

Calcasieu Ship Channel, Port of Lake 

Charles, Calcasieu and Cameron 

Parishes, LA. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

preferred alternative. Rating LO. 

Final EISs 

EIS No. 20090049, ERP No. F–COE– 

K36149–CA, San Diego Creek 

Watershed Special Area Management 

Plan/Watershed Streambed Alteration 

Agreement Process (SAMP/WSAA 

Process), Protecting and Enhancing 

Aquatic Resource and Permitting 

Reasonable Economic Development, 

Orange County, CA. 

Summary: EPA’s previous issues have 

been resolved; therefore, EPA does not 

object with the proposed action. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES