alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 807 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 807

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the amount of the 
charitable deduction allowable for contributions of food inventory, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2003

  Mr. Houghton (for himself and Mr. Lewis of Georgia) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the amount of the 
charitable deduction allowable for contributions of food inventory, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Good Samaritan Tax Act''.

SEC. 2. CHARITABLE DEDUCTION FOR CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOOD INVENTORY.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain contributions of ordinary 
income and capital gain property) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(7) Special rule for contributions of food inventory.--
                    ``(A) Contributions by non-corporate taxpayers.--In 
                the case of a charitable contribution of food, 
                paragraph (3) shall be applied without regard to 
                whether or not the contribution is made by a 
                corporation.
                    ``(B) Determination of fair market value.--For 
                purposes of this section, in the case of a charitable 
                contribution of food which is a qualified contribution 
                (within the meaning of paragraph (3), as modified by 
                subparagraph (A) of this paragraph) and which, solely 
                by reason of internal standards of the taxpayer, lack 
                of market, or similar circumstances, cannot or will not 
                be sold, the fair market value of such contribution 
                shall be determined--
                            ``(i) without regard to such internal 
                        standards, such lack of market, or such 
                        circumstances, and
                            ``(ii) if applicable, by taking into 
                        account the price at which the same or similar 
                        food items are sold by the taxpayer at the time 
                        of the contribution (or, if not so sold at such 
                        time, in the recent past).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 795 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 795

 To require the Secretary of Energy to develop a plan to decrease the 
    threat resulting from the theft or diversion of highly enriched 
                                uranium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2003

Mr. Deutsch (for himself and Mr. Markey) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Energy to develop a plan to decrease the 
    threat resulting from the theft or diversion of highly enriched 
                                uranium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLAN.

    Section 307 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
5877) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall transmit to the Congress a plan 
to decrease the threat resulting from the theft or diversion of highly 
enriched uranium. Such plan shall provide, as appropriate, for--
            ``(1) monitoring of highly enriched uranium supplies at any 
        commercial companies who have access to substantial amounts of 
        highly enriched uranium;
            ``(2) assistance to companies described in paragraph (1) 
        with security and personnel checks;
            ``(3) acceleration of the process of blending down excess 
        highly enriched uranium into low-enriched uranium;
            ``(4) purchasing highly enriched uranium;
            ``(5) paying the cost of shipping highly enriched uranium;
            ``(6) accelerating the conversion of commercial research 
        reactors and energy reactors to the use of low-enriched uranium 
        where they now use highly enriched uranium; and
            ``(7) minimizing, and encouraging transparency in, the 
        further enrichment of low-enriched uranium to highly enriched 
        uranium.''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 14, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

_______________ 

### m 05-20300 Summary Calendar

_______________



### D IANA 

### G IANNAK 

### S ANTAROSE 

### , Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS


### P HILLIP 

### R OCHELLI 

### , A U.S. V ESSEL , 

### Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Texas 

### m 4:04-CV-4292

______________________________2

Before S MITH , GARZA , and P RADO , Circuit Judges.
P ER C URIAM * : Diana Santarose appeals the dismissal of her claims against Phillip Rochelli, an Internal Revenue Service agent whom Santarose ident ifies as “a U.S. vessel.” The district court ’s March 9 , 2005 Memorandum and Opinion correctl y explains the legal basis fo r the dismissal, and Santarose makes no arguments on appeal that cast any doubt on the district court’s decision. We refer Sant arose to the district court’s opi

nio n fo r an explanation of why her suit was properly dismissed. The judgment of dismissal is AFFIRMED, essentially fo r the reasons given by the district court.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent exc ept under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.
A “ bl ue w ar ran t” is s ue s for the ar res t of a pa rol ee s us pe cte d of v i ol at i ng t he t er ms 1 of his or her parole
. See F

ra nkl in v. Kyle, 899 S.W .2d 405, 40 6 n.1 ( Tex .App. –W aco 1995, no p et.); T ex. Gov ’t Code An n. §§ 508 .25 1 & 50 8.2 52 (Ve rnon 200 4). SeeTe x . Gov’t C ode Ann. § 5 0 8
. 2 8 3 (c) (Verno n 20 04). T his provisi on is 2 commonl y

kn ow n as the “‘ street- ti me credi t s tatut e,’ ” becau se itspeci fies the condi ti ons by w hich an in ma te ma y

rece iv e credit for t ime se rv ed while relea sed o n pa role or ma nda tory super v is ion
. Ex par

te Noyol a, 215 S. W .3d 8 62, 8 64- 65 ( Tex .C ri m.App. 2007)
. NO. 07-08 -021 6-CV IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL A JU NE 4, 2008

_________

_________

_________

___ IN R E VI NC EN T FR IEM EL

_________

_________

_________

____ Before CAMPBE LL a nd HANCOCK an d PIRT LE, JJ.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HA BEAS CORPUS Pe n d in g be fo re th e Co u rtis t h e pe ti ti o n f ile d b y rela to r Vi n ce n t Fr ie m e l, se e kin g a w rit of hab eas co rpus com pelling his im me diate release f rom th e Moore Cou nty j ail. His peti ti on s tates he h as been he ld there on a “ blu e w ar ra nt” si nce Febr uar y 7, 20 08, w it hout 1 a preli minar

y hear ing
. Hi s p e titi on furt her co ntends he s houl d be re lea sed becau se, by cal cul ati ng ti me ser

v ed, t ime credi ted a nd “s treet- ti me” he has se rv ed hi s ful l sent ence of 2 inca rce ra ti on i n the i nst it uti onal di v is ion of the Tex as Dep artment of Cr imi nal Ju sti ce for2

felony dr iv ing w hil e i ntox ic ated. W e w il l dis mis s h is peti ti on for w ri t of habeas co rp us for w ant o f jur is dicti on. W here, as here, an order of re strain t ar is es in a c ri minal proceed ing w e are not empow ered to act on a pet it ion for writ o f habeas co rp us. Ex par te Layto n, 928 S. W .2d 781 , 782 (Tex.App .–A ma rill o 199 6, orig . procee ding) ( citi ng Tex . G ov ’tC ode An n. § 22.221 (Verno n Sup p . 199 6)) (j urisdiction of court of app eals to issue w rit of hab eas co rpus is li mite d to peti ti oner

se eki ng rele ase from rest ra inti mposed for v iol ati on or enforc ement of p re vio u s o rd e r i n a ci vil ca s e ). Ra t h e r, t h e T e xa s Co u rto f Cr im in a l A p p e a ls h a s e xc lu s ive jur is dicti on ov er

pos t- conv icti on w ri ts of ha beas cor pus in felony ca ses . Boar

d of Par dons and Par ole s ex. re l. Keene v. Cou rt of Appeal

s f or the Ei ghth Di st. , 910 S. W .2d 4 81, 4 83 (Tex .C ri m.App.1 995) ; In r e Br is coe, 230 S.W .3d 196, 19 6 ( Tex .App. –Ho ust on [1 4th D is t.] 2006 , o r i g . p ro c e e d i n g ) ( s t a t i n g t h a t c o u rt s o f a p p e a l h a v e n o j u r i s d i c t i o n o v er pos tconv icti on w ri ts of habeas corpu s in felony ca ses ); Tex . C ode C ri m. Proc. Ann. ar t 11. 07 § 3 ( Ver non Su pp. 2 007)
. Acc ordin g ly , t he pet it ion for w ri t of habeas co rp us is di smi ss ed for w ant o f jur is dicti on.
Jam es T . Camp bell Justice
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 761 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans’ Affairs to provide adapted housing assistance to disabled members 

of the Armed Forces who remain on active duty pending medical separation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003 

Mr. EVANS (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. FILNER, Mr. RENZI, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. REYES, Mr. 

MICHAUD, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. LANGEVIN, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans’ Affairs to provide adapted housing 

assistance to disabled members of the Armed Forces 

who remain on active duty pending medical separation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled 

5 Servicemembers Adapted Housing Assistance Act of 

6 2003’’. 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with BILLS

2 

•HR 761 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO PROVIDE ADAPTED HOUSING 

2 ASSISTANCE TO CERTAIN DISABLED MEM3 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO REMAIN 

4 ON ACTIVE DUTY. 

5 Section 2101 of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 section: 

8 ‘‘(c)(1) The Secretary may provide assistance under 

9 subsection (a) to a member of the Armed Forces serving 

10 on active duty who is suffering from a disability described 

11 in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of that subsection if such 

12 disability is the result of an injury incurred or disease con13 tracted in or aggravated in line of duty in the active mili14 tary, naval, or air service. Such assistance shall be pro15 vided to the same extent as assistance is provided under 

16 that subsection to veterans eligible for assistance under 

17 that subsection and subject to the requirements of the sec18 ond sentence of that subsection. 

19 ‘‘(2) The Secretary may provide assistance under 

20 subsection (b) to a member of the Armed Forces serving 

21 on active duty who is suffering from a disability described 

22 in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) of that sub23 section if such disability is the result of an injury incurred 

24 or disease contracted in or aggravated in line of duty in 

25 the active military, naval, or air service. Such assistance 

26 shall be provided to the same extent as assistance is prommaher on MIKETEMP with BILLS

3 

•HR 761 IH 

1 vided under such subsection to veterans eligible for assist2 ance under that subsection and subject to the require3 ments of paragraph (2) of that subsection.’’. 

Æ 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of PetroChina Company Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Chen Geng, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date: June 28, 2004

                                          /s/ Chen Geng
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Chen Geng
                                          Title: Chairman of Board of Directors
                                                 (performing the functions of
                                                 Chief Executive Officer)
|  Name                                                                                              |  Jurisdiction                                     | Percent      Owned byLive Current Media      Inc.                                                                                                                                  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Communicate.com      Delaware Inc.                                                                      | Delaware                                                    | 100%                                                                                                                                                                               |
| Domain      Holdings Inc.                                                                               | Alberta,      Canada                                        | 98.2%                                                                                                                                                                              |
| Acadia      Management Corp.                                                                            | British      Columbia, Canada                               | 98.2%      (wholly-owned subsidiary of DHI) *                                                                                                                                      |
| 0778229      BC Ltd.                                                                                    | British      Columbia, Canada                               | 98.2%      (wholly-owned subsidiary of DHI)                                                                                                                                        |
| 612793      BC Ltd. LCM      Cricket Ventures Pte. Ltd. Global      Cricket Venture Pte. Ltd. | British      Columbia, Canada Singapore Singapore | 98.2%      (wholly-owned subsidiary of DHI) 100% 50.05%      (shares are owned by LCM Cricket Ventures Pte. Ltd., a wholly-owned      subsidiary of Live Current Media)  |

----
S07Y1143.

#### IN THE MATTER OF JON PHILIP CARR.

(646 SE2d 252)

Decided June 4, 2007.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition of Jon Philip Carr for suspension pending appeal of his felony convictions in the Superior Court of Baldwin County. It is a violation of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct for a lawyer to be convicted of a felony (Rule 8.4 (a) (2)), and the maximum penalty for such conduct is disbarment. Rule 8.4 (d). The State Bar recommends that the Court accept the petition.

Having considered the petition and response, the Court hereby accepts the voluntary petition and directs that Jon Philip Carr be suspended from the practice of law pending the termination of the appeal of his criminal convictions. See Rule 4-106 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct; *In the Matter of Haugabrook,*275 Ga. 201 (563 SE2d 844) (2002).

Carr is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Voluntary suspension until further order of this Court.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6707]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “The Moon: Houston, Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, TX, in celebration of the fortieth anniversary of the first men walking on the moon, from on or about September 27, 2009, until on or about January 10, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (                        *telephone:*                         202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.                    

Dated: July 14, 2009.

C. Miller Crouch,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-17547 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derek A. Jones, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[852 NYS2d 905]

Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.
Exhibit 10.1




 


 





 


 


March 2, 2013


 


Adam Remis:


 


Dear Adam,


 


Congratulations! Inn Suites Hospitality
Trust is pleased to offer you the Chief Financial Officer's (CFO) position at InnSuites Hospitality Trust in Phoenix Arizona. The
start date will be as soon as you are able, preferably no later than March 18, 2013.


 


Your first year total income will be a minimum
of $139,000 plus a discretionary first fiscal year bonus of at least $5,000 in your first year.


 


Your bonus projection will start March 1,
2013. You will receive our full support to onboard you with our Auditor, former Controller, Cleveland attorneys and Bankers for
fast success.


 


In addition the company will provide a company
cell phone with free Sprint calling. If you wish we can transfer your old cell number to new Sprint and if you would ever wish,
you could transfer this number away from the company phone Sprint since this number belongs to you. If you wish, the company will
pay up to $100 for provider switch if you want to cancel your cell service at another provider.


 


In addition any out of town travel will
be at the current reimbursement rate; currently this is $.48 per mile. If air travel is necessary we reimburse actual cost. Typically
we use Southwest Airlines internet reservations as our airline of choice since they allow changes to tickets without penalty and
their internet ticket costs are sometimes lower than other carriers. You and your staff are not authorized to sign contracts or
agreements over $2000 or over 30 days.


 


InnSuites will pay for your CPA/CISA annual
renewal and education hours to keep the license active during your tenure with InnSuites.


 


During your first year of employment, you
will receive one week of personal time and two weeks of vacation. After one year you are eligible to participate in the 401K program
for InnSuites Hotels.


 


After 30 days of employment you may join
the InnSuites health insurance; COBRA paid by InnSuites until the start of the health insurance.


 


With prior written authorization and approval,
InnSuites will pay for industry-related education and conferences that are measured with a verifiable ROI for your personal and
InnSuites growth.


 


All provisions of the employee handbook
and guidelines apply. Please review the Employee handbook and confirm by signing the receipt agreement in the Handbook.


 


Terms of this arrangement are confidential.


 






    	 



    	 



    




 


If you have any questions, please let me
know. If this meets your approval, please sign and return a copy of this letter. We look forward to long and prosperous career
together providing support to you and InnSuites' success. Welcome to InnSuites Hospitality Trust!


 


Sincerely,


 


InnSuites Hospitality Trust


 


	/s/ Pamela Barnhill, President	 
	Pamela Barnhill, President	 
	 	 
	/s/ Adam Remis	 
	Approved, Adam Remis	 


 


 


	Cc:	James Wirth, Chairman & CEO
	 	Marc Berg, Executive Vice President