alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FocusEnhancements, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gary L. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Gary L. Williams    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Gary L. Williams        |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 14, 2005  |

 

*The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  A signed original of this written statementor other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Focus Enhancements, Inc.and such statement will be retained by Focus Enhancements, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2013

h1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2013

145863

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145863

COA: 305475

Oakland CC: 2011

- 235533

- FC

JONATHAN VINCENT HUNTER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of November 20, 2012, the application for leave to appeal the July 24,

2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

People v Hardy (Docket No. 144327) and People v Glenn (Docket No. 144979). On

order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 29, 2013, 494 Mich 430 (2013),

the application is again considered, and it is DENI ED, because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 775 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 775

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the diversity 
                           immigrant program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2003

 Mr. Goodlatte (for himself, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Hall, Mr. Forbes, 
    Mr. Boyd, Mr. Goode, Mr. Graves, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Cantor, Mr. 
 Culberson, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. Burns, Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia, and 
  Mr. Bartlett of Maryland) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the diversity 
                           immigrant program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as--
            (1) the ``Security and Fairness Enhancement for America Act 
        of 2003''; or
            (2) the ``SAFE for America Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT PROGRAM.

    (a) Worldwide Level of Diversity Immigrants.--Section 201 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and'' at the end of paragraph 
                (1);
                    (B) by striking ``; and'' at the end of paragraph 
                (2) and inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (3); and
            (2) by striking subsection (e).
    (b) Allocation of Diversity Immigrant Visas.--Section 203 of such 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1153) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c);
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``(a), (b), or (c),'' 
        and inserting ``(a) or (b),'';
            (3) in subsection (e), by striking paragraph (2) and 
        redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2);
            (4) in subsection (f), by striking ``(a), (b), or (c)'' and 
        inserting ``(a) or (b)''; and
            (5) in subsection (g), by striking ``(a), (b), and (c)'' 
        and inserting ``(a) and (b)''.
    (c) Procedure for Granting Immigrant Status.--Section 204 of such 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a)(1)(I); and
            (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``(a), (b), or (c)'' and 
        inserting ``(a) or (b)''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on October 1, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from June 30, 1999 10-QSB
and is qualified in it's entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLAR

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                              1
<CASH>                                               1,154,440
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,021,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                            41,095
<INVENTORY>                                            723,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     3,194,329
<PP&E>                                               9,494,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,248,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      12,256,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,146,180
<BONDS>                                              5,340,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                 2,748
<OTHER-SE>                                           5,142,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        12,256,435
<SALES>                                              3,921,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3,921,740
<CGS>                                                3,026,495
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5,100,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       992,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        26,255
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     231,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (2,364,730)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (2,364,730)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       4,170,315
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       (222,864)
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,582,721
<EPS-BASIC>                                              .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .68



</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 5 The Westaim Corporation
Finance Code of Conduct for
Chief Executive and Senior Financial Officers The Westaim Corporations Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial
Officer (CFO) and other employees of the finance organization hold an important
and elevated role in corporate governance in that they are uniquely capable and
empowered to ensure that all stakeholders interests are appropriately
balanced, protected and preserved. The Board of Directors of The Westaim
Corporation has developed and adopted this Finance Code of Conduct applicable
to its CEO, CFO and other senior finance employees. All employees covered by this Finance Code of Conduct are accountable for
adherence to this Code of Conduct and will:  
    
    Act responsibly and ethically, with honesty and integrity, avoiding
actual or apparent conflicts of interest between their personal and
professional relationships, ethically handling all such actual or
apparent conflicts of interest.
    
    Provide stakeholders with information that is accurate, complete,
objective, fair, relevant, timely and understandable, including in
company filings with securities regulators or commissions and in any
other public communications made by The Westaim Corporation.
    
    Comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations of federal,
provincial, state and local governments, and other appropriate private
and public regulatory agencies.
    
    Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and
diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing ones
independent judgment to be subordinated.
    
    Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course
of ones work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to
disclose.
    
    Not use confidential information acquired in the course of ones
work for personal advantage.
    
    Be an example of ethical behavior as a responsible partner among
peers, in the work environment and in the community.
    
    Not unduly or fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate, or
mislead any authorized audit or interfere with any auditor engaged in
the performance of an internal or independent audit of the companys
financial statements or accounting books and records.
    
    Promptly report any known violations of this Code of Conduct to the
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
7 6

Table 34. Labor force status of persons 16 to 24 years old by school enrollment, sex, and educational attainment, October 2004

(Numbers in thousands)

Enrolled in school.............................. 20,173 9,293 46.1 8,283 41.1 1,010 10.9 10,880

 Enrolled in high school1

........................ 9,372 2,982 31.8 2,490 26.6 493 16.5 6,389

 Women........................................... 4,459 1,437 32.2 1,231 27.6 205 14.3 3,022

 Men................................................. 4,913 1,545 31.5 1,258 25.6 287 18.6 3,367

 Enrolled in college................................ 10,801 6,311 58.4 5,794 53.6 517 8.2 4,490

 Women........................................... 5,867 3,560 60.7 3,291 56.1 269 7.6 2,307

 Men................................................. 4,934 2,751 55.8 2,503 50.7 248 9.0 2,183

Not enrolled in school......................... 16,331 13,191 80.8 11,564 70.8 1,627 12.3 3,140

 Women.............................................. 7,771 5,706 73.4 4,986 64.2 720 12.6 2,066

 Less than a high school diploma .......... 1,626 867 53.3 662 40.7 205 23.6 759

 High school graduates, no college2

 ...... 3,265 2,384 73.0 2,050 62.8 334 14.0 881

 Some college or associate degree ....... 1,799 1,478 82.2 1,352 75.2 126 8.5 321

 Bachelor’s degree and higher ............... 1,081 976 90.3 921 85.2 55 5.6 105

 Men................................................... 8,560 7,485 87.4 6,578 76.9 907 12.1 1,075

 Less than a high school diploma .......... 2,140 1,668 77.9 1,334 62.3 334 20.0 472

 High school graduates, no college2

 ...... 3,978 3,540 89.0 3,110 78.2 429 12.1 438

 Some college or associate degree ....... 1,658 1,532 92.4 1,425 86.0 106 6.9 126

 Bachelor’s degree and higher ............... 784 746 95.1 708 90.4 37 5.0 38

 Total Percent of 

labor force

Characteristic

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

 Civilian labor force 

 Not in 

labor force Total Percent of 

population 

 Employed Unemployed 

 Total Percent of 

population 

1

 Includes a small number of persons enrolled in grades below

high school. 2

 Includes high school diploma or equivalent.

NOTE: Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not

equal totals.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 917

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1830 South Lake Drive in Lexington, South Carolina, as the ‘‘Floyd 

Spence Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2003

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, 

Mr. DEMINT, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. SPRATT, and Mr. 

CLYBURN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1830 South Lake Drive in Lexington, South 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Floyd Spence Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLOYD SPENCE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1830 South Lake Drive in Lex6 ington, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Floyd Spence Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 917 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Floyd Spence Post Of5 fice Building.

Æ
MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY & CARPENTER, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1300 MOUNT KEMBLE AVENUE

P.O. BOX 2075

MORRISTOWN, NEW JERSEY 07962-2075

(973) 993-8100

FACSIMILE (973) 425-0161

NEW JERSEY NEW YORK PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT MASSACHUSETTS COLORADO DELAWARE

JOSEPH P. LA SALA

Direct dial: (973) 425-8749

jlasala@mdmc-law.com

September 26, 2011

VIA ECF AND HAND DELIVERY

Hon. Dennis M. Cavanaugh, United States District Judge

United States Post Office and Courthouse Building

Federal Square

50 Walnut Street

Newark, New Jersey 07101

Re: Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Medco Health

Solutions, Inc., et al., 

Civil Action No. 11-4211 (DMC) (MF) Dear Judge Cavanaugh: 

We represent Defendants Express Scripts, Inc. and Plato Merger Sub, Inc. (collectively

"Express Scripts") in this matter. As Your Honor is aware, the parties completed briefing on Plaintiffs

pending Motion for Class Certification on Tuesday, September 13, 2011. All Defendants oppose that

Motion for the reasons explained more fully in their briefs. In considering Plaintiffs Motion, we write

to ask Your Honor to consider a ruling made on Thursday, September 15, 2011, by the Supreme Court

of New York in Wright v. M&F Worldwide Corp., et al., Index No. 651707/2011, which challenges the 

proposed merger between MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. and M&F Worldwide Corp. 

The defendants in Wright moved to dismiss or stay the New York action in favor of a

consolidated action pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery, where the same class of M&F

Worldwide shareholders had already been certified. The defendants also opposed the New York

plaintiff s motion for consolidation, and co-lead plaintiff and interim co-lead counsel status. 

The Court in Wright considered some of the issues reviewed by this Court, including the firstfiled issue, as well as the location and convenience of witnesses. However, the Court granted

Defendants motion to dismiss, emphasizing that there is really tremendous potential for inconsistent

rulings [in Delaware and New York], which is a very disturbing factor because we re dealing with the

exact same case, and we can t have inconsistent rulings. (Hr g Tr. at 18). A copy of Justice

Kornreich s ruling is attached for Your Honor s review.

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59 Filed 09/26/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2649
MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY & CARPENTER, LLP

Hon. Dennis M. Cavanaugh

September 26, 2011

Page 2

We are mindful that the Court has already denied Express Scripts motion to dismiss or stay. However, certifying the same class of Medco stockholders that has already been certified in Delaware

presents precisely the same risks as those identified by Justice Kornreich. 

Class certification is an important issue of constitutional significance. We respectfully submit 

that the issue should be resolved promptly, and greatly appreciate Your Honor s consideration of the

pending motion. 

Respectfully,

/s/ Joseph P. La Sala

 Joseph P. La Sala

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 59 Filed 09/26/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2650
DEMAND
NOTE





$50,000.00
            Dated:
      July 23, 2009





FOR VALUE RECEIVED, INFINITE GROUP, INC.,a
corporation with offices at 60 Office Park Way, Pittsford, New York 14534 (the
“Borrower”), hereby promises to pay on demandto JAMES VILLA,an individual
residing at 308 Rock Beach Road, Rochester, NY 14617 (the “Lender”), the
principal sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), plus accrued interest at
the annual rate of twelve percent (12%).





Borrower
shall have the right, at its option and without prior notice to Lender, and
without penalty, to prepay all or any part of the outstanding principal amount
of this Note at any time.





Upon the occurrence of any of the
following events of default, the entire indebtedness evidenced by this Note,
including expenses of collection, shall immediately become due and payable
without further notice, presentation or demand:





(i)  The failure to pay the
principal amount of this Note together with accrued interest within ten (10)
days of its due date following the Lender’s written notice of default and
demand;





(ii)  The bankruptcy of
Borrower or the filing by Borrower of a voluntary petition under any provision
of the bankruptcy laws; the institution of bankruptcy proceedings in any form
against Borrower which shall be consented to or permitted to remain undismissed
or unstayed for ninety (90) days; or the making by Borrower of an assignment for
the benefit of creditors;





(iii)  The taking of any
judgment against Borrower, which judgment is not paid in accordance with its
terms, satisfied, discharged, stayed or bonded within ninety (90) days from the
entry thereof; or





(iv)  The assignment of this
Note by Borrower, provided, however, that Borrower may assign this Note to any
person or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control
with, Borrower.





No failure on the part of Lender to
exercise, and no delay in exercising, any of the rights provided for herein,
shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise by
Lender of any right preclude any other or future exercise thereof or the
exercise of any other right.





Lender shall not, without the express
prior written consent of Borrower, assign, sell, gift or otherwise transfer this
Note to any third party, provided, however, that Lender may assign this Note to
any person or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control
with, Lender without the prior consent of Borrower.





Borrower
agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by Lender in enforcing this Note,
including without limitation all reasonable attorneys fees and expenses incurred
by Lender.





This Note shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has caused this Note to be executed and delivered as
of the date set forth above.





INFINITE
      GROUP, INC.By
              /s/ Michael S. SmithMichael
      S. Smith, President
### IN THE CO URT OF APPEALS OF TE NNE SS EE
AT KNOX VILLE

Nov em be r 4, 2 01 3 S es si on

DWI GHT O. SATTE RFIEL D v. MARGARET H . SATTERFI ELD

A p p e a l f r o m t h e G e n e r a l S e s s i o n s C o u r t f o r B l o u n t C o u n t y
N o

. S 4 7 7 1 W i l l i a m R

. B r e w e r , J r

. , J u d g e

N o

. E 2 0 1 2

- 0 2 3 6 7

- C O A

- R 3

- C V

- F I L E D

- F E B R U A R Y 2 8
, 2 0 1 4

C H A R LE S D

. S U S A N O

, J R

. , C h i e f J u d g e , c o n c u r r i n g

.

I c o n c u r c o m p l e t e l y i n J u d g e S w i n e y ’ s w e l l

- r e a s o n e d m a j o r i t y o p i n i o n

. I w r i t e

s e p a r a t e l y t o s t r e s s t h e l i n c h p i n o f t h e m a j o r i t y ’ s r a t i o n a l e i n r e

j e c t i n g M r

. S a t t e r f

i e l d ’ s f i r s t
i s s u e

.

I n t h a t f

i r s t i s s u e , M r

. S a t t e r f

i e l d p h r a s e d h i s a r g u m e n t s o l e l y w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e l a n g u a g e o

f t h e M D A

. H e t o o k t h e p o s i t i o n t h i s l a n g u a g e d e m o n s t r a t e d t h a t t h e p a r t i e s i n t e n d e d t h a t c o h a b i t a t i o n w i t h a “ t h i r d p e r s o n ” w o u l d r e s u l t i n a t e r m i n a t i o n o f h i s g e n e r a l

a l i m o n y o b l i g a t i o n o f $ 8 0 0 p e r m o n t h

. A g a i n , M r

. S a t t e r f i e l d ’ s p o s i t i o n o n h i s f

i r s t i s s u e

w a s f o c u s e d s o l e l y u p o n t h e p a r t i e s ’ i n t e n t i o n a s r e f l e c t e d i n t h e l a n g u a g e t h e y s e l e c t e d f o r

t h e i r M D A

. T h e m a

j o r i t y h e l d t h a t t h e s u b j e c t l a n g u a g e d i d n o t d e m o n s t r a t e a n y s u c h

i n t e n t i o n

. A s t o t h i s f

i r s t i s s u e , t h a t i s a l l t h e m a j o r i t y h o l d s

. A s I p r e v i o u s l y s t a t e d

, I c o n c u r

c o m p l e t e l y i n t h i s d e t e r m i n a t i o n a s w e l l a s t h e o t h e r h o l d i n g s o f t h e m a j o r i t y o p i n i o n

.

_____________________________________ CHARL ES D. SUSANO, J R., CHI EF JUDGE

1
[No. 32860-7-II.

Division Two.

November 29, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Donald Eric Goodloe, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 04-1-00854-7, M. Karlynn Haberly, J., entered February 4, 2005. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Armstrong, JJ.
# 17SNR14_00

# image1.png
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-1A of our
report dated November 30, 2001, relating to the financial statements and
per-share data and ratios of Capital Income Builder, Inc., which appears in
such Registration Statement.  We also consent to the references to us under the
headings "Financial Highlights", "Independent Accountants" and "Prospectuses,
Reports to Shareholders and Proxy Statements" in such Registration Statement.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California

May 9, 2002