alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 11.01

                            CONDUCTUS, INC.

               STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                 (In thousands, except per share data)
                             (Unaudited)
 

                               THREE MONTHS ENDED       NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                 SEPTEMBER 30,            SEPTEMBER 30,
                               ------------------       -----------------
                                 1996       1995          1996        1995
                               -------     ------       -------     -------

Net loss                       $(1,244)    $ (865)      $(3,970)    $(3,597)
                               -------     ------       -------     -------

Weighted average number of
shares outstanding               6,782      5,609         6,084       5,506
                               -------     ------       -------     -------
 
Common and common
equivalent shares used in 
computing per share amounts      6,782      5,609         6,084       5,506
                               -------     ------       -------     -------
                               -------     ------       -------     -------
 
  
Net loss per share              $(0.18)    $(0.15)       $(0.65)     $(0.65)
                               -------     ------       -------     -------
                               -------     ------       -------     -------


There is no difference between loss per share on a fully diluted or
primary basis.


                                     -17-
Exhibit
      32.1








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**(Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William H.
      Armstrong III, as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 9, 2006










/s/
      William H. Armstrong III


William
      H. Armstrong III


Chairman
      of the Board, President and


Chief
      Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 110 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                           May 8, 2003.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. EXPENSES FOR THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY FOR THE ONE 
              HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS.

    With respect to the One Hundred Eighth Congress, there shall be paid out of 
the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives, in accordance with this 
primary expense resolution, not more than $10,952,787 for the expenses 
(including the expenses of all staff salaries) of the Select Committee on 
Homeland Security.

SEC. 2. FIRST SESSION LIMITATION.

    Of the amount provided for in section 1, not more than $5,366,866 shall be 
available for expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on January 
3, 2003, and ending immediately before noon on January 3, 2004.

SEC. 3. SECOND SESSION LIMITATION.

    Of the amount provided for in section 1, not more than $5,585,921 shall be 
available for expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on January 
3, 2004, and ending immediately before noon on January 3, 2005.

SEC. 4. VOUCHERS.

     Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized by the 
Select Committee on Homeland Security, signed by the chairman of such Committee, 
and approved in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 5. REGULATIONS.

     Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 6. ADJUSTMENT AUTHORITY.

     The Committee on House Administration shall have authority to make 
adjustments in the amount under section 1, if necessary to comply with an order 
of the President issued under section 254 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
Deficit Control Act of 1985 or to conform to any reduction in appropriations for 
the purposes of such section 1.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Opinion issued October 15, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00763-CV

———————————

IN RE ESTATE OF SAYDA J. HERNANDEZ, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, the Estate of Sayda J. Hernandez, filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus, contending that respondent, the Honorable Michael Landrum, abused 

his discretion in conducting a hearing on relator’s motion to quash depositions

without proper notice to relator, and ordering depositions and discovery to proceed 
2

over relator’s objections.

1 Relator’s counsel subsequently filed a letter in this Court 

stating that he has decided to withdraw the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

construe counsel’s letter as a motion to dismiss the petition. The letter has been on 

file with the Court for more than ten days. Neither the real party in interest, 

Sandpiper Apartments, LP, nor respondent has expressed opposition to withdrawal 

of the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).

We grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss the petition for writ of 

mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.

 

1

The petition identifies the underlying case as Omar Castro, as Representative of the 

Estate of Sayda J. Reyes Hernandez, Deceased, and as Legal Guardian of MOC and 

JEC, Minor Children, and Miriam Elizabeth Hernandez, Individually and as Next Friend 

of ACG and MIG, Minor Children v. Sandpiper Apartments, LP, Cause No. 2011-57667, 

in the 113th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Landrum, 

presiding.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

R.J.P., a Child,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-1306

[August 12, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County; James L. Martz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502015DP300104

JO.

Liza R. Galindo of Law Office of Liza R. Galindo, P.A., Miami Springs,

for appellant.

Rosemarie Farrell, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See O.I.C.L. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 2015 WL

4461164 (Fla. 4th DCA July 22, 2015).

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         6,028,980
<SECURITIES>                                   794,373
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,001,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                   432,150
<INVENTORY>                                    3,007,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               19,794,559
<PP&E>                                         3,103,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,937,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,742,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,599,531
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       174,584
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,050,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,742,495
<SALES>                                        12,124,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,124,034
<CGS>                                          6,847,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,135,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,768)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             137,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,010,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                   29,661
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            980,397
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   980,397
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.06
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Issue 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice 
Improvement Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, August 20, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement 
Issue Committee will be held Thursday, August 20, 2009, at 2 p.m. 
Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Sallie Chavez. For more information please contact Ms. Chavez 
at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine 
Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the 
Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 16, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-17476 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-44430, 333-81504, 333-152810, 333-160938, and 333-163836 on Forms S-8 of our reports dated June 3, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of OPNET Technologies, Inc. and itssubsidiaries and the effectiveness of OPNET Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K of OPNET Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2011.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

June 3, 2011
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In    connection with the Annual Report of lastminute.com plc (the “Company”)    on Form 20-F for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),    the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.        The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and 
2.        The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: March 31, 2004 | Name:  |  /s/ Brent Hoberman                      Brent Hoberman                     |
|----------------------|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Title:      | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                          |
|                 |        |                                                                                                                                                             |
| Date: March 31, 2004 | Name:       | /s/ David Howell                           David Howell |
|                 | Title:      | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                          |

----
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: MARTIN JOSEPH BODO, Appellant

______________________

2022

- 1244

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/691,433.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D ONALD E. S CHREIBER

, Law Offices of Donald E. Schreiber, Kings Beach, CA, argued for appellant.

M AI -T RANG D UC D ANG

, Office of the Solicitor, UnitedStates Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by

K

AKOLI C APRIHAN

, T HOMAS W. K RAUSE

, A MY J. N ELSON

, F ARHEENA Y ASMEEN R ASHEED

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED : Case: 22-1244 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 12/08/2022P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, C HEN

, and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 8 , 2022
Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 22-1244 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 12/08/2022
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

County of Allegheny, Pennsylvania

, :

Appellant :

:

v. :

:

Allegheny County Prison Employees : No. 1469 C.D. 2019

Independent Union :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 7th day of January

, 20 2 1

, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

the above

- captioned opinion filed November 1 9 , 2020, shall be designated

OPINION rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION and it shall be reported.

_____________________________________ CHRISTINE FIZZANO CANNON , Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                         Independent Accountant's Report

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Slippery Rock Financial Corporation

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Slippery Rock
Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of June 30, 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated statement
of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the
consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated February 8, 2002 we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
Wexford, PA
August 1, 2002
# laucnty05

&8Page &P of &N
# full-time by work levels
#### David Griffith, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v Michael Gallagher et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[852 NYS2d 869]

Same memorandum as in *Griffith v Gallagher*(49 AD3d 1297 [2008]). Present-Scudder, P.J., Centra, Lunn, Fahey and Green, JJ.
#### LeeAnn Lahren et al., Appellants, v Boehmer Transportation Corp. et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[852 NYS2d 917]

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present-Hurlbutt, J.P., Smith, Centra, Lunn and Fahey, JJ.
79

Table 34. Labor force status of persons 16 to 24 years old by school enrollment, sex, and educational 

attainment, October 2006

(Numbers in thousands)

Enrolled in school............................... 20,797 9,001 43.3 8,204 39.4 797 8.9 11,796 

 Enrolled in high school 1

........................ 10,315 3,235 31.4 2,767 26.8 468 14.5 7,080 

 Women........................................... 5,032 1,648 32.7 1,424 28.3 224 13.6 3,384 

 Men................................................. 5,283 1,587 30.0 1,343 25.4 244 15.4 3,696 

 Enrolled in college................................ 10,482 5,766 55.0 5,437 51.9 329 5.7 4,716 

 Women........................................... 5,623 3,179 56.5 3,013 53.6 166 5.2 2,444 

 Men................................................. 4,859 2,586 53.2 2,424 49.9 163 6.3 2,273 

Not enrolled in school......................... 16,250 13,299 81.8 11,811 72.7 1,488 11.2 2,950 

 Women.............................................. 7,686 5,769 75.1 5,119 66.6 650 11.3 1,916 

 Less than a high school diploma ........... 1,506 796 52.9 590 39.2 206 25.9 709 

 High school graduates, no college 2 ..... 3,147 2,295 72.9 2,008 63.8 287 12.5 852 

 Some college or associate degree ........ 1,903 1,626 85.5 1,522 80.0 105 6.4 276 

 Bachelor’s degree and higher ............... 1,130 1,052 93.0 999 88.4 53 5.0 79 

 Men................................................... 8,564 7,530 87.9 6,692 78.1 838 11.1 1,034 

 Less than a high school diploma ........... 1,925 1,528 79.4 1,335 69.4 193 12.6 397 

 High school graduates, no college 2 ..... 4,008 3,531 88.1 3,079 76.8 452 12.8 477 

 Some college or associate degree ........ 1,674 1,567 93.7 1,444 86.3 124 7.9 106 

 Bachelor’s degree and higher ............... 958 903 94.3 834 87.1 69 7.6 55 

 Not in 

labor

 Total force

 Percent of 

population

 Employed Unemployed 

 Total Percent of 

population Total 

Percent

of labor 

force

Characteristic

 Civilian 

noninstitutional

population

 Civilian labor force 

 1 Includes a small number of persons enrolled in grades below high school.

2 Includes high school diploma or equivalent.

 NOTE: Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not equal totals.

 SOURCE: October 2006 Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

79
Second Amendment to Lease dated February 27, 2013



 Exhibit 10.23 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE 
 This Second Amendment to Lease (this
“Second Amendment”) is entered into as of February 27, 2013 by and between SNH Medical Office Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“Landlord”) and AXOGEN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
(“Tenant”). 
 WHEREAS, Wigshaw, LLC (“Original Landlord”) and Tenant entered into that
certain Lease dated February 6, 2007 (the “Original Lease”) for certain premises in the building known as the Progress One Building and located at 13859 Progress Boulevard, Alachua, Florida; and 

WHEREAS, Landlord succeeded to the interest of Original Landlord under the Original Lease and, with Tenant, entered into that certain
First Amendment to Lease dated March 14, 2012 (the Original Lease, as so amended, the “Lease”); and 

WHEREAS, the Lease is scheduled to expire on April 30, 2013; and 

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant have agreed to amend the Lease to extend the term thereof, subject to and upon the terms and conditions
hereinafter provided; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree that the Lease is hereby amended as follows: 
 1.
Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Lease. 
 2. The
Term of the Lease is hereby extended and shall expire on April 30, 2014. 
 3. For the period commencing on May 1, 2013
and ending on April 30, 2014, Annual Gross Rent shall be $94,840.00 per annum, payable in equal monthly installments of $7,903.33, in advance. 
 4. Tenant acknowledges that it is currently in possession of the Leased Premises and is agreeing to an extension of the Term with the Leased Premises being accepted in “as is” condition as of
the date of this Second Amendment. 
 5. Tenant warrants and represents that it has dealt with no broker in connection with the
consummation of this Second Amendment, other than Coldwell Banker Commercial/M.M. Parish Realtors (“Broker”), and in the event of any brokerage claims or liens, other than by Broker, against Landlord or the Building predicated upon
or arising out of prior dealings with Tenant, Tenant agrees to defend the same and indemnify and hold Landlord harmless against any such claim, and to discharge any such lien. 
 6. As amended hereby, the Lease is hereby ratified and confirmed. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have executed this Second Amendment as of the date
first written above. 
  

					
	LANDLORD:
	
	SNH Medical Office Properties Trust
		
	By:	 	 Reit Management & Research LLC,
 its managing agent

			
		 	By:	 	/s/ David M. Lepore
		 		 	David M. Lepore
		 		 	Senior Vice President


  

			
	TENANT:
	
	Axogen Corporation
		
	By:	 	/s/ Karen Zaderej
		 	Name: Karen Zaderej
		 	Title: CEO



  
 - 2 -