alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report datedMarch 15, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Orchid Cellmark Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of said report in the Registration Statements of Orchid Cellmark Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-60582, effective May 10, 2001, File No. 333-85550, effective April 4, 2002, File No. 333-98825, effective August 28,2002, File No. 333-105732, effective May 30, 2003, File No. 333-111892, effective May 27, 2004 and File No. 333-113981 effective May 27, 2004) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-53118, effective January 3, 2001, FileNo. 333-76744, effective January 15, 2002, File No. 333-126227, effective June 29, 2005, and File No. 333-146002, effective September 12, 2007). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

New York, New York 

March 15, 2011
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 727

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include sports utility vehicles 

in the limitation on the depreciation of certain luxury automobiles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2003

Ms. ESHOO (for herself, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Ms. LEE, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. 

WAXMAN, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. FILNER, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. FARR, Mr. 

GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. LANTOS, and Mr. MORAN of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

sports utility vehicles in the limitation on the depreciation of certain luxury automobiles.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SUV Business Tax 

5 Loophole Closure Act’’. 
2

•HR 727 IH 

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF SPORTS UTILITY VEHICLES IN LIMI2 TATION ON DEPRECIATION OF CERTAIN LUX3 URY AUTOMOBILES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 280F(d)(5)(A) of the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining passenger auto6 mobile) is amended by striking clause (ii) and all that fol7 lows and inserting the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(ii)(I) except as provided in sub9 clause (II) or (III), which is rated at 6,000 

10 pounds unloaded gross vehicle weight or 

11 less, 

12 ‘‘(II) in the case of a truck or van, 

13 which is rated at 6,000 pounds gross vehi14 cle weight or less, or 

15 ‘‘(III) in the case of a sports utility 

16 vehicle, which is rated at 14,000 pounds 

17 gross vehicle weight or less.’’. 

18 (b) DEFINITION.—Section 280F(d)(5) of the Internal 

19 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

20 the following new subparagraph: 

21 ‘‘(C) SPORTS UTILITY VEHICLES.—The 

22 term ‘sports utility vehicle’ does not include any 

23 vehicle which—

24 ‘‘(I) does not have the primary 

25 load carrying device or container at26 tached, 
3

•HR 727 IH 

1 ‘‘(II) has a seating capacity of 

2 more than 12 individuals, 

3 ‘‘(III) is designed for more than 

4 9 individuals in seating rearward of 

5 the driver’s seat, 

6 ‘‘(IV) is equipped with an open 

7 cargo area, or a covered box not read8 ily accessible from the passenger com9 partment, of at least 72.0 inches in 

10 interior length, or 

11 ‘‘(V) has an integral enclosure, 

12 fully enclosing the driver compartment 

13 and load carrying device, does not 

14 have seating rearward of the driver’s 

15 seat, and has no body section pro16 truding more than 30 inches ahead of 

17 the leading edge of the windshield.’’. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

20 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 788 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 131
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 788

                          [Report No. 108-67]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 26, 2003

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                              June 9, 2003

              Reported by Mr. Domenici, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To revise the boundary of the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in 
                    the States of Utah and Arizona.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 
Boundary Revision Act''.

SEC. 2. GLEN CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA BOUNDARY REVISION.

    (a) In General.--The first section of Public Law 92-593 (16 U.S.C. 
460dd; 86 Stat. 1311) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``That in'' and inserting ``Section 1. (a) 
        In''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) In addition to the boundary change authority under subsection 
(a), the Secretary may acquire approximately 152 acres of private land 
in exchange for approximately 370 acres of land within the boundary of 
Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, as generally depicted on the map 
entitled `Page One Land Exchange Proposal', number 608/60573a-2002, and 
dated May 16, 2002. The map shall be on file and available for public 
inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service. 
Upon conclusion of the exchange, the boundary of the recreation area 
shall be revised to reflect the exchange.''.
    (b) Change in Acreage Ceiling.--Such section is further amended by 
striking ``one million two hundred and thirty-six thousand eight 
hundred and eighty acres'' and inserting ``1,256,000 acres''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 25, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 131

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 788

                          [Report No. 108-67]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To revise the boundary of the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in 
                    the States of Utah and Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 9, 2003

                       Reported without amendment
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 27, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1310

Lower Tribunal No. 14-15885

________________

C.J., the Father,

Appellant,

vs.

Department of Children and Families, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Angelica D. 

Zayas, Judge.

Thomas Butler, P.A., and Thomas J. Butler, for appellant.

Karla Perkins, for appellee Department of Children & Families; Twig, 

Trade & Tribunal, PLLC, and Morgan Lyle Weinstein (Fort Lauderdale), and 

Thomasina F. Moore (Tallahassee), for appellee Statewide Guardian ad 

Litem Office.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed.
# 2015

# 2016

# 2017

# 2018
# 19QRTL6_00
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 13, 2014 517928 

________________________________

In the Matter of MARTIN 

SANCHEZ,

Petitioner,

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner 

of Corrections and 

Community Supervision,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 16, 2014

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________

Martin Sanchez, Coxsackie, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A.

Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of respondent which found petitioner

guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.
-2- 517928 

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7745
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DESMOND WARD, a/k/a David A. King, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-29; CA-00-257-3-1-MU) Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 18, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen Howard Rosen, Miami, Florida, for Appellant. Frank DeArmon Whitney, United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Desmond Ward seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ward has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# 2011

# 2012

# 2013

# 2014

# 2015

# 2016

# 2017

&8page &P of &N
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10189

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

THERESA CALTON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CR-163-1

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Theresa Calton has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Calton has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Calton’s response. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-10189 Document: 00511640125 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
No. 11-10189

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-10189 Document: 00511640125 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 
THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 
1997 AND JUNE 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,344,000
<SECURITIES>                                    22,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,882,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (118,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,115,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,628,000
<PP&E>                                       2,722,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (967,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,708,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,881,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       240,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,279,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,708,000
<SALES>                                      4,491,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,491,000
<CGS>                                        2,772,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,639,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 142 (Monday, July 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37040-37041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17735]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.

[[Page 37041]]

    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; Panel A: NIAAA Review of GO 
Grants & P30 Faculty recruitment Supplement.
    Date: August 11, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Richard A Rippe, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 2109, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-443-8599, [email protected].
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: July 20, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17735 Filed 7-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
[No. 54589-2-I.

Division One.

November 21, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Rodney Ray Rientjes, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-1-04569-8, Cheryl B. Carey, J., entered June 18, 2004. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Appelwick, A.C.J., concurred in by Grosse and Baker, JJ.
# 2012

# 2011

# 2013

# 2014

# 2015

# 2016

# 2017

# 2018

# 2019

# 2020
Exhibit 31.2
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                       of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, L. Kirk Boyd, Chief Financial Officer of Dialex Minerals Inc., hereby certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dialex Minerals Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

         (a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that
         material  information   relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
         consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
         being prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         (c)  presented  in  this  annual  report  my   conclusions   about  the
         effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on my
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation,  to the  registrant's
auditors and to the audit  committee  of  registrant's  board of  directors  (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls  which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
         record,   process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
         identified  for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         (b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
         other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any  corrective  actions with regard to  significant  deficiencies  and material
weaknesses.

Date: April 15, 2004

/s/  L. Kirk Boyd
---------------------------------------
     By: L. Kirk Boyd,
     Title: Chief Financial Officer
Order filed October 18, 2018

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 18

- 00714

- CV

___________

KENNETH LABARRON FLO WERS , Appellant

V.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORN EY GENERAL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris C ounty, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 321010311

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter

for the 311th District Court informed this court that appellant had not made

arrangements for payment for the reporter ’s record. On August 17, 2018 , the clerk

of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that

do not require a reporter ’ s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice,

provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See T ex. R. App

. P.

37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply.Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty

days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court

will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6801
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DOMAINE MARTIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:93-cr-00122-FWB-1) Submitted: May 30, 2007 Decided: July 10, 2007 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Domaine Martin, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Domaine Martin appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) (2000) for credit for prior custody. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Martin , No. 6:93-cr-00122-FWB-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED