alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DENMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

EXHIBIT (32.1)

CERTIFICATIONS



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '
1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Denmark Bancshares, Inc. ("DBI"), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DBI for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DBI.



|/s/ Darrell R. Lemmens              
|------------------------------------
|Darrell R. Lemmens,                 
|Principal Executive Officer,        
|Chairman of the Board, and President



|/s/ Dennis J. Heim           
|-----------------------------
|Dennis J. Heim               
|Vice President and Treasurer,
|Principal Financial and      
|Accounting Officer           
|                             
|Date:  August 2, 2006
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Submitted July 12, 2019 

Decided July 12, 2019 

Before 

DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge 

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge 

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Nos. 17-1300 & 17-1325 

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF 

OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 399, 

et al., 

Plaintiff-Appellees, CrossAppellants,

v. 

VILLAGE OF LINCOLNSHIRE, et al., 

 Defendants-Appellants, CrossAppellees.

 Appeals from the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of 

Illinois, Eastern Division. 

No. 1:16-cv-02395 

Matthew F. Kennelly, 

Judge. 

O R D E R 

 The Supreme Court has granted the Village of Lincolnshire’s writ of certiorari 

seeking review of our decision in this case, 905 F.3d 995 (7th Cir. 2018), and has vacated 

our judgment. See Village of Lincolnshire v. Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs Local 399, No. 

18-1070, 2019 WL 653081 (mem.) (U.S. June 10, 2019). Pursuant to the Court’s order, we 

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION 

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 
Nos. 17-1300 & 17-1325 Page 2 

now remand this case to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the case as moot. 

See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Exhibit 15.1

      April 24, 2002

      Stratus Properties Inc.
      98 San Jacinto Blvd.
      Suite 220
      Austin, TX 78701

      Gentlemen:

      We are aware that Stratus  Properties Inc. has incorporated by
      reference in its Registration Statements (File Nos. 33-78798,
      333-31059 and 333-52995)its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2002, which includes our report dated April 24, 2002
      covering the unaudited interim financial information contained
      therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933
      (the Act), this report is not considered a part of the registration
      statements prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared
      or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11
      of the Act.

      Very truly yours,

      /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
Table 8. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population 25 to 64 years of age by educational 

attainment and sex, 2008 annual averages 

(Numbers in thousands)

 Civilian labor force 

 Employed Unemployed 

 Total 

Percent 

of 

population 

 Total 

 Percent 

of labor 

force 

Total

Total, 25 to 64 years........................... 159,142 126,011 79.2 120,181 75.5 5,830 4.6 33,131

 Less than a high school diploma......... 17,959 11,400 63.5 10,353 57.6 1,047 9.2 6,559

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 47,528 36,263 76.3 34,181 71.9 2,082 5.7 11,265

 Some college or associate degree...... 43,487 35,251 81.1 33,639 77.4 1,612 4.6 8,236

 College graduates, total................... 50,168 43,097 85.9 42,008 83.7 1,089 2.5 7,071

 Bachelor's degree........................... 33,175 28,214 85.0 27,445 82.7 769 2.7 4,961

 Master's degree............................ 12,454 10,775 86.5 10,531 84.6 244 2.3 1,679

 Professional degree........................ 2,550 2,306 90.4 2,267 88.9 40 1.7 244

 Doctoral degree.............................. 1,989 1,801 90.6 1,766 88.8 35 2.0 188

Women

Total, 25 to 64 years......................... 80,941 58,465 72.2 55,858 69.0 2,607 4.5 22,476

 Less than a high school diploma......... 8,379 4,045 48.3 3,652 43.6 393 9.7 4,334

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 23,352 15,881 68.0 15,024 64.3 857 5.4 7,471

 Some college or associate degree...... 23,369 17,754 76.0 16,945 72.5 809 4.6 5,614

 College graduates, total..................... 25,842 20,785 80.4 20,237 78.3 548 2.6 5,057

 Bachelor's degree......................... 17,230 13,605 79.0 13,219 76.7 386 2.8 3,624

 Master's degree............................ 6,829 5,637 82.5 5,512 80.7 124 2.2 1,192

 Professional degree........................ 1,023 879 85.9 860 84.1 19 2.2 144

 Doctoral degree.............................. 760 664 87.4 646 85.0 18 2.8 96

Men

Total, 25 to 64 years........................... 78,202 67,546 86.4 64,323 82.3 3,223 4.8 10,655

 Less than a high school diploma......... 9,580 7,355 76.8 6,700 69.9 655 8.9 2,225

 High school graduates, no college1

...... 24,176 20,382 84.3 19,157 79.2 1,225 6.0 3,794

 Some college or associate degree...... 20,119 17,497 87.0 16,694 83.0 803 4.6 2,622

 College graduates, total..................... 24,326 22,312 91.7 21,772 89.5 540 2.4 2,014

 Bachelor's degree......................... 15,945 14,608 91.6 14,226 89.2 383 2.6 1,337

 Master's degree.............................. 5,625 5,139 91.4 5,019 89.2 120 2.3 486

 Professional degree....................... 1,528 1,428 93.5 1,407 92.1 21 1.5 100

 Doctoral degree.............................. 1,229 1,137 92.5 1,120 91.2 17 1.5 92

 1

 Includes persons with a high school diploma or equivalent.

 SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Educational attainment and sex

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

Not 

in 

labor 

force 

 Total 

Percent 

of 

population 

21
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 129

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage stamp 

should be issued in commemoration of Diwali, a festival celebrated by 

people of Indian origin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2003

Mr. PALLONE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

a postage stamp should be issued in commemoration 

of Diwali, a festival celebrated by people of Indian origin.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) a postage stamp should be issued by the 

4 United States Postal Service in commemoration of 

5 Diwali, a festival celebrated by people of Indian ori6 gin; and 
2

•HRES 129 IH 

1 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

2 should recommend to the Postmaster General that 

3 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
NO. 07-08-0238-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 27, 2009

______________________________

CALLIE N. LONG, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2003-404322; HONORABLE BRADLEY UNDERWOOD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

On June 3, 2008, appellant, Callie N. Long, filed a notice of appeal from a conviction

for failure to stop and render aid and the resulting sentence of six months in county jail.

The clerk’s record was filed on July 9 and the reporter’s record was filed on August 5. 

Since that time, this Court has granted four extensions of time for filing appellant’s

brief. The appellate clerk has also sent two late notices and informed appellant that the

failure to comply with the imposed deadline to file the brief may result in the appeal being

abated and the cause being remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. See Tex.
2

R. App. P. 38.8(b). The Court last extended the due date to February 6, 2009. As of this

date, appellant’s brief has not been filed.

Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for

further proceedings. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). On remand, the trial court shall

conduct a hearing pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) to: (1) determine whether appellant

desires to prosecute her appeal; (2) determine whether appellant is indigent, or if not

indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal; and (3) to make appropriate

findings and recommendations. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). Should it be determined that

appellant does want to continue the appeal and the court determines that present counsel

should be replaced, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of the

newly-appointed or newly-retained counsel shall be provided to the Clerk of this Court.

 The trial court is directed to: (1) conduct any necessary hearings; (2) make and file

appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law, and recommendations and cause them

to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record; (3) cause the hearing proceedings to be

transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter’s record; (4) have a record of the

proceedings made to the extent any of the proceedings are not included in the

supplemental clerk’s record or the supplemental reporter’s record; and (5) cause the

records of the proceedings to be sent to this Court. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). In the

absence of a request for extension of time from the trial court, the supplemental clerk’s

record, supplemental reporter’s record, and any additional proceeding records, including

any orders, findings, conclusions, and recommendations, are to be filed by March 27,

2009. 
3

It is so ordered. 

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 32

                       Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Headliners Entertainment
Group, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and
will be retained by Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

April 14, 2005                    /s/ Eduardo Rodriguez
                                  -------------------------------
                                  Eduardo Rodriguez (Chief
                                  executive officer and chief
                                  financial officer)
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Soyo Group, Inc. and Subsidiary
Ontario, California

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
Soyo Group, Inc. and Subsidiary on Form S-8 (No. 333-123155) of our report dated
March 31, 2008 relating to the consolidated  financial statements of Soyo Group,
Inc.  and  Subsidiary  as of  December  31, 2007 and 2006 and for the years then
ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Vasquez & Company, LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 31, 2008
#### Michael SNOWDEN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Respondent.

No. 2012-3153.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 8, 2013.

David A. Branch, Law Office of David A. Branch & Associates, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.

Michelle Milberg, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were Stuart F. Delery, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Reginald T. Blades, Jr., Assistant Director.

RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

*978JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,700,489
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,383,220
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                67,951
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 28,363,128
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    197,878,578
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,620,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             247,524,554
<DEPOSITS>                                 154,672,129
<SHORT-TERM>                                47,388,153
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,791,049
<LONG-TERM>                                 24,476,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,999,980
<COMMON>                                     1,274,749
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,922,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             247,524,554
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             12,602,580
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,659,108
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               470,619
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            14,732,307
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,660,271
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,668,561
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,063,746
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  433,710
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             200,035
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,316,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,853,632
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,853,632
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,162,411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.998
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,765,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               331,186
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                558,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,549,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  465,403
<RECOVERIES>                                   102,693
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,620,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           409,505
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      2,210,495
        

</TABLE>
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

19. Persons at work in agriculture and nonagricultural industries by hours of work

[Numbers in thousands]

Hours of work

2014

Persons at work Percent distribution

All

industries

Agriculture

and related

industries

Nonagricultural

industries

All

industries

Agriculture

and related

industries

Nonagricultural

industries

Total, persons at work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141,276 2,158 139,118 100.0 100.0 100.0

1 to 34 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,873 561 34,312 24.7 26.0 24.7

1 to 4 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,433 47 1,386 1.0 2.2 1.0

5 to 14 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,263 128 5,135 3.7 5.9 3.7

15 to 29 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,519 246 17,273 12.4 11.4 12.4

30 to 34 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,658 140 10,518 7.5 6.5 7.6

35 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106,403 1,597 104,806 75.3 74.0 75.3

35 to 39 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,504 107 9,397 6.7 5.0 6.8

40 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,280 633 60,647 43.4 29.3 43.6

41 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,619 857 34,762 25.2 39.7 25.0

41 to 48 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,229 150 12,079 8.7 7.0 8.7

49 to 59 hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,778 260 13,518 9.8 12.1 9.7

60 hours and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,612 446 9,166 6.8 20.7 6.6

Average hours, total at work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38.6 42.3 38.6 – – –

Average hours, persons who usually work full time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.5 48.0 42.5 – – –

NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data. Dash indicates no data or data that do not meet publication criteria (values

not shown where base is less than 35,000).

1
Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Spear & Jackson, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, William
Fletcher, acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

   1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ William Fletcher
--------------------
William Fletcher
Acting Chief Executive Officer

December 23, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 Michael V. Shustek, as Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., the
sole Manager of Vestin Fund I, LLC (the Registrant), and Lance K. Bradford,
as Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that  (1)
    
    the Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with
the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant. Dated: December 14, 2004/s/ Michael V. ShustekMichael V. Shustek*Chief Executive Officer
of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., Manager of the RegistrantDated: December 14, 2004/s/ Lance K. BradfordLance K. Bradford*Chief Financial Officer
of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., Manager of the Registrant
 * Michael V. Shustek and Lance K. Bradford function as the equivalent of the
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Registrant for purposes of 18
U.S.C. Section 1350.
Opinion issued September 4, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00639-CR

———————————

IN RE DONALD WAYNE HEROD, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Donald Wayne Herod, has filed a pro se petition for writ of 

mandamus, and motion for leave to file, seeking to compel the respondent trial 

court to rule on his “motion to discover the blood sample,” which he claims was 

filed under various statutes, including Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 

11.073.1

 

1 Relator identifies the respondent only as the 339th District Court of Harris County, 

but lists the underlying cause number 1152281 which corresponds to The State of 
2

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), 

(d). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

Texas v. Donald Wayne Herod, the Honorable Caprice Cosper presiding. We 

affirmed relator’s conviction under that cause number for felony driving while 

intoxicated. Donald Wayne Herod v. State, No. 01-08-00908-CR, 2010 WL 

1981577, at *5 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 13, 2010, pet. ref’d).
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0438. LANIER 5, LLC v. CERTUSBANK, N. A.

Lanier 5, LLC (“Lanier”) filed this discretionary application seeking appellate

review of orders entered in two lower court cases, 2014CV1559 and 2015CV1764.

The application is hereby GRANTED. In order to appeal, Lanier must file notices of

appeal in both cases within 10 days of the date of this order.1 The Clerk of Superior

Court is directed to include copies of this order in the recordstransmitted to the Court

of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 See, e. g., Stephenson v. Futch, 213 Ga. 247, 248 (2) (98 SE2d 374) (1957)

(“[T]here is no authority in law for the review of the two judgments in a single bill

of exceptions[.]”). 

May 30, 2017

05/30/2017
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in uWink, Inc.'s previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (file No 333-116807 and 333-122907 filed on
June 24, 2004 and February 18, 2005, respectively, and file No 333-135113 and
333-138778 filed on June 19, 2006 and November 17, 2006, respectively) of our
report, dated March 7, 2006, for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of uWink, Inc for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.


/s/ Kabani & Company, Inc.

Los Angeles

November 28, 2006