alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# TOC

Interactive Charts

Interactive Bubble Chart

United States

Australia

Canada

France

Germany

Italy

Japan

Korea, Republic of

Mexico

Netherlands

New Zealand

South Africa

Spain

Sweden

Turkey

United Kingdom

# 1-1

# 1-2

# 1-3

# 1-4

# 1-5

# 1-6

# 1-7

# 1-8

# 2-1

# 2-2

# 2-3

# 2-4

# 2-5

# 2-6

# 2-7

# 2-8

# 2-9

# 2-10

# 2-11

# 2-12

# 3-1

# 3-2

# 3-3

# 3-4

# 3-5

# 3-6

# 3-7

# 3-8

# 4-1

# 4-2

# 4-3

# Dynamic Dashboard

# Dynamic Dashboard

# Dynamic Bubble Chart

# Calculations

# United States

# Australia

# Canada

# France

# Germany

# Italy

# Japan

# Korea, Republic of

# Mexico

# Netherlands

# New Zealand

# South Africa

# Spain

# Sweden

# Turkey

# United Kingdom

# United Kingdom

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

For additional information regarding concepts and definitions, see Technical Notes.

(b) Break in series; see country notes for more information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1,000
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                            695
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   9,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     (911)
<INVENTORY>                                                    13,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               23,961
<PP&E>                                                         19,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 (9,160)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 57,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         (74,604)
<BONDS>                                                           (38)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                      (28,051)
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   17,720
<SALES>                                                        24,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               24,183
<CGS>                                                          18,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  22,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               (2,838)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              2,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 2,159
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       71
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             2,085
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    2,085
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.44
             


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Teodoro Miguel Hernandez, Appellant

No. 06-15-00167-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 428th District Court of 

Hays County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR-14-

0339). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we reverse the trial court’s judgment 

convicting Hernandez of and sentencing him for the crime of aggravated assault with a deadly 

weapon and, in lieu of that judgment, render a judgment convicting Hernandez of the lesserincluded offense of assault. Further, we remand this matter to the trial court for a new punishment 

hearing for the offense of assault. We affirm the trial court’s judgment of conviction as to the 

offense of sexual assault in all respects.

We note that the appellant, Teodoro Miguel Hernandez, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 5, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Satyam Computer Services
Limited (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
year ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



| |                                                                                                                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                     |  |  |                                              
|-------------------- |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 30, 2003 |  |  | /s/ B. Rama Raju                             
|                     |  |  |                                              
|                     |  |  | Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1292

WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID LEMMON, Colonel,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph Robert Goodwin,

District Judge. (6:06-cv-00169)

Submitted: October 15, 2007 Decided: October 23, 2007

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Grottendieck

Lanham, John A. Hoyer, STATE POLICE LEGAL COUNSEL, South

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

William Cunningham appeals a district court order and

judgment order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and

dismissing his civil rights complaint challenging provisions of the

West Virginia Sex Offender Registration Act (“Act”), West Va. Code

Ann. §§ 15-12-1 - 15-12-10 (LexisNexis 2004 & Supp. 2007). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for

the reasons cited by the district court. See Cunningham v. Lemmon,

No. 6:06-cv-00169 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 22, 2007). Cunningham has

filed motions to certify questions to the United States Supreme

Court and to file a supplemental informal brief. We deny the

motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Read the following descriptions of careers. Can you can identy which jobs 

BLS collects information on and which jobs are made up just for fun? 

Be sure to visit bls.gov/k12 for more classroom activities!

Occupation Overview

Bakers mix ingredients according to 

recipes in order to make breads, 

pastries, and other baked goods. 

They work in bakeries, grocery 

stores, and restaurants. Work shifts often 

include early mornings and holidays. 

Bakers

Ghost hunters

Ghost hunters spend their 

days tracking paranormal 

activity. They interview 

individuals, research popular 

locations, or use special 

technology to help them 

locate where there might be 

a ghost. They often work at 

haunted houses or old 

builings late at night. 

Witches

Witches study spells, magic and fortune 

telling. They mix together ingredietes to 

create powerful potions. They often work 

from home with flexible schedules. 

Werewolves

Werewolves are people 

who can shape shift into a 

wolf. They are very stong 

and have good night vision. 

Shifts include late nights, 

espcially during full moons.

Graphic Designers

Graphic designers create visual 

concepts, using computer software or 

by hand, to communicate ideas that

 inspire, inform, and captivate 

consumers. Many of these workers 

are employed in specialized design 

services, publishing, or advertising, 

public relations, and related 

services industries. 

Journalists

Journalists keep the public updated 

about current events and noteworthy information. They work for 

newspaper, website, or magazine 

publishers or in television or radio 

broadcasting. Their schedules vary.
Cookie, Lolly, and Sweetie are excited to celebrate Halloween. They 

dressed up as spooky ghosts! But now, no one can tell the three friends 

apart. Can you figure out who is under each costume after listening to a 

story about their day? 

Hint: We know that Cookie is a Graphic Designer, Lolly is a Journalist, 

and Sweetie is a Baker.

What a day! Can you believe that I had an 

order for 200 candy-filled, crumbly, chocolate 

cupcakes? I spent all morning at the bakery 

measuring out ingredients, mixing batter, and 

decorating. 

Sounds sweet! I went to the town square this 

morning to watch the Halloween parade.

I took pictures of my favorite costumes and 

went home to write about what I had seen. 

I submitted my story to the newspaper so 

the fun can be shared with everyone. 

Sounds yummy! I spent my day in the 

office with plenty of pictures of pumpkins. 

I used my computer to design flyers for 

the new pumpkin patch. I met with the 

owners to show them all the different 

colors, pictures, and fonts we can use to 

make sure people visit. 

Be sure to visit bls.gov/ooh for more fun with career exploration!

Ghosts at Work
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 781

To amend the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to exempt attorneys from the privacy 

provisions of that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mrs. BIGGERT (for herself, Mrs. MALONEY, Ms. BALDWIN, Mrs. JONES of 

Ohio, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. WATT, Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico, and Mr. 

FRANK of Massachusetts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To amend the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to exempt attorneys 

from the privacy provisions of that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Privacy Protection 

5 Clarification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION. 

7 Section 509(3) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara9 graph: 
2

•HR 781 IH 

1 ‘‘(E) ATTORNEYS.—Notwithstanding sub2 paragraph (A), the term ‘financial institution’ 

3 does not include attorneys at law who are sub4 ject to, and in compliance with, regulation of 

5 client confidentiality in the form of rules of pro6 fessional conduct promulgated either by the 

7 court of highest appellate authority or by the 

8 principal legislative body of any State of the 

9 United States, the District of Columbia, any 

10 territory of the United States, Puerto Rico, 

11 Guam, American Samoa, the Trust Territory of 

12 the Pacific Islands, the Virgin Islands, or the 

13 Northern Mariana Islands.’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1840

JENNIFER M. MCGOWAN,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES, NORTHEAST, INC.; URSULA BASKETT,

 Defendants – Appellees,

and

ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES - NORTH CENTRAL, INC.; ABM

JANITORIAL SERVICES - MID-ATLANTIC, INC.,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:10-cv-00388-MSD-DEM)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 6, 2012

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jennifer M. McGowan, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Ward, MORRIS 

& MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

In this personal injury action, removed to federal 

court under the court’s diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 

(2006), Jennifer M. McGowan appeals the district court's order

granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss 

for lack of jurisdiction. Having reviewed the district court’s 

ruling de novo, Taylor v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 658 

F.3d 402, 408 (4th Cir. 2011), we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. McGowan v. ABM Janitorial Servs., No. 

2:10-cv-00388-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. filed June 29 & entered June 30, 

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

        Washington, D.C. 20549        

FORM 8-K

 

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):           January 21, 2003           
 

                                 NORTHEAST BANCORP                                  

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

             Maine             
            1-14588            
        01-0425066       
(State or Other Jurisdiction Incorporation)
(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification Number)
 

     158 Court Street, Auburn, Maine     
          04210          
  (Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
 

 

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
     (207) 777-6411         
 

 
**Item 7.**Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(c)
Exhibits.******Exhibit No.**     Description
99.1
Press Release, dated January 21, 2003 regarding second quarter 2003 earnings, the declaration of a dividend and the expansion of operations.**Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure.**
     On January 21, 2003, Northeast Bancorp, a Maine corporation (the "Company"), issued a press release announcing it's earnings for the second quarter ended December 31, 2002 and declaring the payment of a dividend. 
     A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.

     This press release is furnished pursuant to Item 9 of this Form 8-K and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  Further, the information in this report (including the exhibits hereto) are not to be incorporated by reference into any of the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, whether filed prior to or after the furnishing of these certificates, regardless of any general or specific incorporation language in such filing.

 

 

 [Rest of Page Intentionally Blank.  Signature on Following Page.]
** 

 

 

SIGNATURE**
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
  
NORTHEAST BANCORP
Date:  January 21, 2003
By:
/s/ James D. Delamater  
    James D. Delamater  *    President and Chief Executive Officer
 
** 

EXHIBIT INDEX****Exhibit No.**     Description
99.1
Press Release, dated January 21, 2003 regarding second quarter 2003 earnings, the declaration of a dividend and the expansion of operations.*************
#### Helen BUREN, Plaintiff, v. Samuel B. SCHEIN, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 20277.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

Jan. 28, 1960.

Lee Feltman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Corcoran, Kostelanetz, Gladstone & Lowell, New York City, for defendant, Stanley H. Lowell and Thomas F. Ryan, New York City, of counsel.

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a, plaintiff’s motion to vacate defendant’s notice to take the deposition of the plaintiff, Helen Burén, and one, George J. Burén as a witness, the defendant’s notice having been served pri- or to that of the plaintiff to take the deposition of the defendant.

The sole question is whether in a case in which plaintiff alleges fraud on the part of the defendant, plaintiff is entitled to priority in the taking of depositions although the plaintiff’s notice is subsequent in point of time to that served by the defendant.

The general principle has come to be recognized that orderly procedure in such matters accords priority to the notice first served. Such has been the custom in the Southern District, see cases cited in Zweifler v. Sleco Laces, Inc., D.C., 11 F.R.D. 202. The same is true in this district, Fruit Growers Co-op v. California Pie & Baking Co., D.C., 48 F.Supp. 1021.

Departure from the accepted practice may be sanctioned in the presence of compelling circumstances, Park & Tilford Distillers Corp. v. The Distillers Company, D.C., 19 F.R.D. 169.

The mere fact that plaintiff’s case sounds in fraud is not deemed to be such a circumstance, because the defendant may learn through discovery the factual basis for the plaintiff’s claim. That is true in all discovery procedures.

This court is not required by any process of reasoning to follow the rules of priority adopted by the Supreme Court of the State of New York in New York County, since it is merely a matter of practice.

The allegations of the pleadings have been examined and the issues seem to be clearly drawn, namely, whether there were fraudulent misrepresentations as alleged made by the defendant, which the answer denies.

*505It is not apparent why such issues differ from any others in an ordinary civil case, and the priority principle heretofore recognized will not be departed from in this case.

Motion denied. Settle order.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Amendment
No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Simula, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley P. Forst,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:






| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.




| |                                                                                
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Bradley P. Forst

Bradley P. Forst
Chief Executive Officer
November 5, 2003
|