alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Abdullah Y. Salahuddin, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[856 NYS2d 890]

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of possession of contraband, unauthorized possession of facility documents and unauthorized possession of grievance and disciplinary documents pertaining to other inmates. This determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Substantial evidence, consisting of two misbehavior reports and the testimony adduced at the hearing, supports the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Martin v Goord,*46 AD3d 1294, 1295 [2007]; *Matter of Frejomil v LaClair,*46 AD3d 1061, 1061 [2007]). Petitioner’s assertion that he had authorization* to possess the multiple items in question created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve, as did his claim that the misbehavior reports were issued in retaliation for grievances he filed *(see Matter of Johnson v Goord,*46 AD3d 1038 [2007]; *Matter of Lashley v Lindsay,*45 AD3d 1073, 1073 [2007]).

To the extent that they were preserved, petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claims of procedural error, have been considered and determined to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

*

 Petitioner did produce a local permit authorizing his possession of a Sony Walkman.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 52-036; NRC-2008-0616]

Entergy Operations, Inc. (EOI) on behalf of itself; Entergy Louisiana, LLC (ELL); Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C. (EGSL); and Entergy Mississippi, Inc. (EMI) has submitted an application for a combined license (COL) to build Unit 3 at its River Bend Station (RBS) site, located on approximately 3,330 acres in West Feliciana Parish on the Mississippi River, approximately three miles southeast of St. Francisville, Louisiana and 24 miles north-northwest of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. EOI submitted the application for the COL to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on September 25, 2008, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 52.

                    A notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement and conduct scoping process was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 5, 2009 (74 FR 324). On January 9, 2009, EOI submitted a letter to NRC requesting that the staff suspend its review of the RBS Unit 3 COL application. The purpose of this notice is to inform the public that the NRC has canceled the scoping process and the associated scoping meeting for this application.                          ( print page 4986)    

                    Questions about this cancellation should be directed to Mr. Andrew Kugler at 301-415-2828 or via e-mail at                     *Andrew.Kugler@nrc.gov*.                

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd day of January 2009.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Scott C. Flanders,

Director, Division of Site and Environmental Reviews, Office of New Reactors.

[FR Doc. E9-1779 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17465]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Assistance Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer 
Income Tax Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, August 11, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718 488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Issue Committee will be held Tuesday, August 11, 2009, at 2 p.m. 
Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Marisa Knispel. For more information please contact Ms. 
Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 
MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us 
at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS Issues.

    Dated: July 16, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-17465 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1086

STEVEN IVEY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

FAIR LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, a/k/a Federal Labor 

Relations Authority; NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

DOUG VAN BUREN; LISA PORTER; ANGELA STRONG,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever,

III, Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00064-D)

Submitted: June 11, 2012 Decided: June 19, 2012

Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Ivey, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Penny Johnson, Rosa M. 

Koppel, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Washington, D.C.; 

Peyton H.N. Lawrimore, L. Pat Wynns, NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES 

UNION, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Steven Ivey seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss his complaint. We 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice 

of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on October 24, 2011. The notice of appeal was filed on January 

17, 2012. Because Ivey failed to file a timely notice of appeal 

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the Court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                    LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AND JOINT VENTURES

Subsidiary and joint ventures of the Group are as follows, these being held by
Group companies unless indicated:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        COUNTRY OF
                                                      REGISTRATION OR                                ORDINARY
             NAME OF COMPANY                           INCORPORATION         PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY     HELD SHARES
             ---------------                         ------------------      ------------------     -----------
<S>                                                  <C>                     <C>                        <C>
INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES
Last Minute Network Limited (1).................     England and Wales       Marketer                   100%
Lastminute.com GmbH.............................     Germany                 Marketer                   100%
Lastminute AB...................................     Sweden                  Marketer                   100%
Last Minute Network S.A.R.L.....................     France                  Marketer                    99%
Revalfi S.A.. ..................................     France                  Marketer                   100%
Voyages Sur Mesures S.A. .......................     France                  Marketer                   100%
Activnet S.A.R.L................................     France                  Marketer                   100%
Lastminute Travel AB............................     Sweden                  Non Trading                100%
Lastminute.com BV...............................     The Netherlands         Marketer                   100%
Lastminute.com s.r.l............................     Italy                   Marketer                    99%
Last Minute s.p.r.l.............................     Belgium                 Non Trading                100%
Last Minute Network Limited.....................     Ireland                 Non Trading                 50%
Last Minute A/S.................................     Norway                  Non Trading                100%
Last Minute A/S.................................     Denmark                 Non Trading                100%
Urbanbite Limited (1)...........................     England and Wales       Marketer                   100%
Urbanbite BV....................................     The Netherlands         Marketer                   100%

INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES
Lastminute.com (Australia) Pty Limited..........     Australia               Marketer                  25.1%
Lastminute.com (Pty) Limited....................     South Africa            Marketer                  25.1%
Lastminute Network S.L..........................     Spain                   Marketer                  30.0%
Lastminute.com Japan Limited....................     Japan                   Non Trading               32.9%
</TABLE>



----------

(1) directly held by lastminute.com plc
Exhibit 32.1

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Public Media Works, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Corbin Bernsen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 11, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Corbin Bernsen     
|                    |  |  |  | Corbin Bernsen         
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### NUMBER 13 - 1 9 - 00 124 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN R E YASEMIN TURAN

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa 1 Relator Yasemin Turan filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on March 25, 2019 . Through this original proceeding, Turan seeks to compel the trial court to vacate its temporary orders pert aining to grandparent access and visitation and to dismiss the case. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN . § 153.433 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.).

1 See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 52.8(d) ( “ When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case, ” but when “ denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. ” ); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opi nions and memorandum opinions).2 To obtain relief by writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that the trial court committed a clear abuse of discretion and that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am ., 494 S.W.3d 708, 712 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

– 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The relator bears the burden of proving both requirements. In re H.E.B. Grocery Co. , 492 S.W .3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); Walker , 827 S.W.2d at 840. Similarly, the relator has the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient mandamus record to establish h er right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 83 3, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); In re Athans , 458 S.W.3d 675, 676 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, orig. proceeding); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.3(k) (specifying the required contents for the appendix); id. R. 52.7(a) (specifying the required conte nts for the record). As it pertains to this case, m andamus relief is available if a trial court grants a grandparent ’ s request for temporary access to grandchildren where the grandparent fails to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that denial of po ssession of or access to the child would significantly impair the child ’ s physical health or emotional well

- being. See In re Scheller , 325 S.W.3d 640, 643 (Tex. 2010) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam) ; In re Derzapf , 219 S.W.3d 327, 335 (Tex. 2007) (orig. p roceeding) (per curiam) ; In re J.M.G. , 553 S.W.3d 137, 140 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2018, orig. proceeding). The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, the record, and the applicable law, is of the opinion that Turan has not met her burden to2 obtain mandamus relief

. Accordingly, without reaching the merits, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and all relief sought therein

. LETICIA HINOJOSA Jus t ice
D elivered and filed the 9t h day of April, 2019.
exhibit_10-1.htm











Exhibit 10.1




 





 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-110652, 333-137102 and 333-153419) of Partner Communications Company Ltd., of our report dated March 18, 2013, relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.


 



	
Tel-Aviv, Israel


March 18, 2013  

	 Kesselman & Kesselman 

 Certified Public Accountants (lsr.)


A member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited







 












Kesselman & Kesselman, Trade Tower, 25 Hamered Street, Tel-Aviv 68125, Israel,


 P.O Box 50005 Tel-Aviv 61500  Telephone: +972 -3- 7954555, Fax:+972 -3- 7954556, www.pwc.com/il
# laucnty23

&8Page &P of &N
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report dated February 15, 2002, included in this Form 10-K,
into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 333-39956,
333-68082 and 333-70148. It should be noted that we have not audited any
financial statements of the Company subsequent to December 31, 2001 or performed
any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
New York, New York
March 20, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,272,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,913,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                   300,942
<INVENTORY>                                    668,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,685,519
<PP&E>                                       9,376,118
<DEPRECIATION>                              (6,932,981)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,710,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,984,935
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           727
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,190,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,710,922
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,167,488
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,632,875
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             144,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,567,114)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,567,114)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of The Vermont  Witch Hazel Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending July 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Kevin B.
Halter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Company.



 /s/ Kevin B. Halter
--------------------


THE VERMONT WITCH HAZEL COMPANY

Chief Finacial Officer

August 26, 2002















S:\RLB\SarbanesCertification.doc
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 
 THIS AGREEMENT is made on 26 March 2012 
 BETWEEN: 

 

	(1)	BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA INC. an Illinois corporation of 4101 Winfield Road, Warrenville, Illinois 60555 (the “Company”); and


  

	(2)	BP plc a company incorporated in England and Wales of 1 St James’s Square, London, SW1Y 4PD (the “Parent”). 


WHEREAS the Company has agreed that it will supply to the Parent assistance by seconding its employee ROBERT W DUDLEY (the “Secondee”)
to the Company in accordance with the terms and conditions of an agreement dated 15th April 2009, (“Agreement”) under the terms of which the secondment would be for a period of three years from the date of the Agreement. The parties
now wish to extend the term of the secondment by a further two years and have agreed with the terms set out below. 
 NOW IT IS HEREBY AGREED
AS FOLLOWS: 
  

	1.	Clause 1.2 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following: 

 “Subject to any earlier termination in accordance with Clause 7 below, the secondment shall be for a period of two years from 15th April 2012. Prior to the expiration of the two year period the
Parent may, upon giving written notice to the Company, extend the secondment in which case the secondment shall continue in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement”. 

 

	2.	This Agreement shall take effect on 15th April 2012. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF this agreement has been executed by the parties hereto and is hereby delivered on the date first
above written. 
  

					
	 SIGNED by
	  	) Steven Bray	  	
	 for and on behalf of
	  	)	  	
	BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA INC	  	)	  	
	 in the presence of:
	  	) Jens Bertelsen	  	
			
	SIGNED by	  	) David Jackson	  	
	for and on behalf of	  	)	  	
	BP p.l.c.	  	)	  	
	in the presence of:	  	) Hannah Ashdown
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2991
HOMER DELOVICH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT B. REICH, SECRETARY OF LABOR, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CA-94-24-1) Submitted: May 14, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996 Before ERVIN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Homer Delovich, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order grantingsummary judgment to Defendant in Appellant's employment discrimination action. We have rev iewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Delovich v. Reich , No. CA-94-24-1 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED