alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         482,789
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  266,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,404
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               761,983
<PP&E>                                       1,995,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 406,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,375,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          190,532
<BONDS>                                      2,915,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          901,799
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           510
<OTHER-SE>                                   (657,580)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,375,979
<SALES>                                         93,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               657,277
<CGS>                                           59,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  415,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,965
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             201,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (375,870)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (375,870)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (375,870)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (8.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.83)


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 14, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

In the

United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

_______________

m 05-20300

Summary Calendar

_______________

DIANA GIANNAK SANTAROSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

PHILLIP ROCHELLI,

A U.S. VESSEL,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

m 4:04-CV-4292

______________________________
2

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, 

Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

Diana Santarose appeals the dismissal of

her claims against Phillip Rochelli, an Internal

Revenue Service agent whom Santarose identifies as “a U.S. vessel.” The district court’s

March 9, 2005 Memorandum and Opinion

correctly explains the legal basis for the dismissal, and Santarose makes no arguments on

appeal that cast any doubt on the district

court’s decision. We refer Santarose to the

district court’s opinion for an explanation of

why her suit was properly dismissed. 

The judgment of dismissal is AFFIRMED,

essentially for the reasons given by the district

court.

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 130 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 6, 2003.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Standards of Official Conduct: Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. Green of 
Texas, Ms. Roybal-Allard, and Mr. Doyle.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 4.1
 Year 2009 Performance Contract with Management of PetroChina Company Limited
 Offeree: Name: ZHOU, Jiping
    
    
    Offeror: Name: JIANG, Jiemin
    
    
    Term of the Contract: January 1, 2010 to December     31, 2010Title:
    
    President of
PetroChina Company Limited
(PetroChina)
    
    
    Title:
    
    Chairman of the
Board of Directors of
PetroChina
    
    
    Date of Execution:January 16, 2010
 Indices
    
    
    Key Performance
    
    
    Weight (%)
    
    
    Measurement
    
    
    Target
    
    
    Actual
    
    
    Departments Providing theIndices (KPI)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Performance
    
    
    NumbersProfits Indices
    
    
    Rate of return of
the invested
capital of
PetroChina (ROIC)
    
    
    35

    
    
    
    
    %

    
    
    
    
    8.4

    
    
    
    
    
    

    Budget Management
DepartmentNet income of
PetroChina (NI)
    
    
    20

    
    
    
    
    In 100 million RMB
    
    
    1002Free cash flow of
PetroChina (FCF)
    
    
    15

    
    
    
    
    In 100 million RMB
    
    
    -458.6Operating Indices
    
    
    Rate of crude oil
reserves replacement
    
    
    10

    
    
    
    
    %

    
    
    
    
    Oil: 1 
Natural Gas: 3
(Domestic model)
    
    
    
    
    
    Planning Department




---



##### 



Domestic unit oil
and gas lifting
cost
    
    
    5

    

    
    
    
    US$/barrel
    


    
    24.18
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Budget Management DepartmentCash processing
cost for oil
    


    
    5
    
    
    
    
    RMB/ton
    


    
    214.0Cash marketing cost
for oil
    


    
    5
    
    
    
    
    RMB/ton
    


    
    346.45Gap between the
actual capital
expenditure and
budget
    


    
    5
    
    
    


    
    %
    


    
    ± 5
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Planning Department




---



##### 



Indices to be Put
under Control
    
    
    Safety and
environmental
protection
    
    
    employee death
arising from industrial production accidents ≤ 0.04%; 
extraordinarily serious safe production accidents = 0; and extraordinarily serious environmental accidents=0.
    
    
    Comprehensive
performance
expressed in marks
to be increased by
5 marks if
achieving the
target for the
relevant index put
under control, and
to be reduced by 5
marks if failing to
achieve the target
for the relevant
index put under
control.
    
    
    Safety and Environment
Protection DepartmentPerformance review marks of the Offeree should be increased by 5 marks if
PetroChina establishes the all-employee performance review system within 2010,
and on the contrary, performance review marks of the Offeree should be
decreased by 5 marks if PetroChina fails to establish the all-employee
performance review system within 2010
 Signature of Offeree: ZHOU JIping
    
    Signature of Offeror: JIANG Jiemin
# 20QRTL2_00
Exhibit 10.26

FIRST AMENDMENT TO
MASTER TOWER SPACE RESERVATION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT AND TO
MASTER TOWER SPACE LICENSE AGREEMENT

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO MASTER TOWER SPACE RESERVATION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT AND TO MASTER TOWER SPACE LICENSE AGREEMENT ("First
Amendment") is entered into and made effective as of the latter signature date hereof (the "Effective Date") by and between AMERICAN TOWERS,
 L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("American Tower"), AMERICAN TOWERS, INC., a Delaware corporation
("ATI"),iPCS WIRELESS, INC., a Delaware corporation ("iPCS") andHORIZON PERSONAL
COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an Ohio corporation ("Horizon").

RECITALS

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, American Tower, ATI, iPCS and Horizon agree to the
following:

---



[Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank]

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have each executed this First Amendment as of the dates written below.

|AMERICAN TOWERS, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership
|-----------------------------------------------------
|By:                                                  
|Name:                                                
|Title:                                               
|Date:                                                
|AMERICAN TOWERS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation        
|By:                                                  
|Name:                                                
|Title:                                               
|Date:                                                
|iPCS WIRELESS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation          
|By:                                                  
|Name:                                                
|Title:                                               
|Date:                                                

---



QuickLinks
#### Glenn W. CONNERY, Gary Jaszewski, and Richard Reid, Appellants, v. Laurence B. BOUCHER, Stephen E. Blightman, Peter K. Craft, David A. Higgen, Clive M. Philbrick, and Daryl D. Starr, Appellees.

No. 2012-1612.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 9, 2013.

Hector J. Ribera, Fenwick & West LLP, of Mountain View, CA, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were Lynn H. Pasahow and Carolyn Chang.

Thomas W. Lathram, Silicon Edge Law Group, LLP, of Pleasanton, CA, argued for appellees. With him on the brief was Mark A. Lauer. Of counsel was Charles L. Gholz, Obion, Spivak, McClelland, Mai-er & Neustadt, LLP, of Alexandria, VA.

MOORE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
```

                                    SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO.       )

FILED BY THE REGISTRANT [X]    FILED BY A PARTY OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT [  ]

Check the appropriate box:
      [ ]   Preliminary Proxy Statement
      [ ]   Definitive Proxy Statement
      [X]   Definitive Additional Materials
      [ ]   Soliciting Material Pursuant to Sec. 240.14a-11(c) or Sec. 240.14a-12
      [ ]   Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

THE AAL MUTUAL FUNDS
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

THE AAL MUTUAL FUNDS
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
      [X]  No fee required.
      [ ]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

           1.   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

           2.   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

           3.   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth
                the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

           4.   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

           5.   Total fee paid:

      [ ]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

      [ ]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which
           the offsetting fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
           Schedule and the date of its filing.

           1.   Amount Previously Paid:

           2.   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

           3.   Filing Party:

           4.   Date Filed:
```

Dear [shareholder name]:

As a shareholder of one or more Lutheran Brotherhood mutual funds, you will or already have received a proxystatement from the funds' board of trustees. The proxy lists several changes to the funds proposed by the boardand provides you an opportunity to vote for or against the changes.

The proxy proposals are to reorganize and merge each fund of the Lutheran Brotherhood Family of Funds into eithera newly formed or an existing fund of The AAL Mutual Funds. Immediately following the reorganizations, each ofthe AAL funds will be renamed using the Thrivent name.

Please review the proxy proposals and vote your shares as soon as possible. If you have any questions about theproposals, please give me a call.

Sincerely,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
THERATECH, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      16,486,914
<SECURITIES>                                 6,881,366
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,779,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                    91,034
<INVENTORY>                                  3,185,233
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,769,600
<PP&E>                                      25,613,824
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,389,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,581,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,062,314
<BONDS>                                      8,298,630
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       206,121
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,802,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,581,465
<SALES>                                      2,904,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,836,843
<CGS>                                        2,152,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,813,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             236,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                786,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            786,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   786,846
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, John E. Baker, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 17, 2004





/s/ John E. Baker



John E. Baker

Senior Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. 
 March 13, 2013 

Mr. Sammy Aaron 
 17 Ormond Park Road

 Brookville, New York 11545 
 Dear
Mr. Aaron: 
 This letter agreement, when executed by you, shall constitute an amendment to the Employment Agreement (the
“Agreement”), dated July 11, 2005, as amended, between G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (the “Company”) and you. 
 The Company and you hereby agree that Section 3(b) of the Agreement shall be amended by the addition of the following language after the Pre-Tax Income table: 

“provided, however, that, with respect to each fiscal year of the Company commencing with the fiscal year ending January 31,
2014, (i) no cash bonus shall be payable hereunder unless the Company’s Pre-Tax Income shall exceed $10,000,000 for such fiscal year and (ii) the maximum annual cash bonus payable with respect to such fiscal year shall be no more than
two times the target annual bonus for such fiscal year based on the budgeted Pre-Tax Income for such fiscal year as determined no later than April 30 of such fiscal year by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and shall be
payable no later than April 15 of the following year.” 
 This Letter Agreement may be executed by the parties hereto
in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Any signature delivered by a party by facsimile transmission, or in “PDF” format
circulated by electronic means, shall be deemed to be an original signature hereto. 
 Except as modified herein, all terms and
provisions of the Agreement continue in full force and effect. If the foregoing accurately sets forth our agreement, please execute this letter and return it to the undersigned. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	G-III APPAREL GROUP, LTD.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Wayne S. Miller



 Accepted and agreed to: 
  

	
	/s/ Sammy Aaron
	Sammy Aaron
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 APRIL 20, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-16384

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-20057-CR-PCH

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RONALD DELANCY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(April 20, 2009)

Before BLACK, BARKETT and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Delancy appeals from the denial of his motion for a reduced

sentence, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 706 to the

Sentencing Guidelines, which reduced the base offense levels applicable to crack
cocaine found in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1. On appeal, Delancy, who was sentenced under

the career offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, concedes that our precedent

forecloses his argument, but, in order to preserve the issue, argues that the district

court erred in denying his motion. After thorough review, we affirm.

“We review de novo a district court’s conclusions about the scope of its

legal authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).” United States v. James, 548 F.3d

983, 984 (11th Cir. 2008).

A district court may modify a term of imprisonment in the case of a

defendant who was sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing

range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission. 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Sentencing Commission has noted that a defendant is

ineligible for a sentence reduction where an “amendment does not have the effect

of lowering [his] applicable guideline range because of the operation of another

guideline or statutory provision.” U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, comment. (n.1(A)).

As Delancy concedes, his argument is foreclosed by precedent. We recently

held that, “[w]here a retroactively applicable guideline amendment reduces a

defendant’s base offense level, but does not alter the sentencing range upon which

his or her sentence was based, § 3582(c)(2) does not authorize a reduction in

sentence.” United States v. Moore, 541 F.3d 1323, 1330 (11th Cir. 2008), cert.

2
denied, McFadden v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 965 (2009), and cert. denied, __ S.

Ct. __ (U.S. Mar. 9, 2009) (No. 08-8554). Because Delancy’s sentencing range

was calculated under the career-offender provisions in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, rather

than the drug quantity table in § 2D1.1, Amendment 706 did not have the effect of

lowering Delancy’s sentencing range, and, thus, he was ineligible for a sentence

reduction. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

3
# 18QRTL6_00

# image1.png
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), John E.
Baker, as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May
5, 2009











/s/
John E. Baker


John E.
Baker


Senior
Vice President &


Chief
Financial Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 4.3




 





Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated March 19, 2013, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-186378) of Smart Trust, High
20 Dividend Strategy Trust, Series 4.




.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


March 19, 2013