alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM 39006

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Todd M. GETZ

Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 22 February 2017

________________________

Military Judge: Donald R. Eller (arraignment); Natalie D. Richardson.

Approved sentence: Dishonorable discharge, confinement for 6 years, 

forfeiture of all pay and allowances,1 and reduction to E-1. Sentence 

adjudged 11 November 2015 by GCM convened at Aviano Air Base, Italy. 

For Appellant: Major Mark C. Bruegger, USAF, and Captain Kevin R. 

Cayton, USAF.

For Appellee: Major Jeremy D. Gehman, USAF, and Gerald R. Bruce, 

Esquire.

Before MAYBERRY, SPERANZA, and JOHNSON, Appellate Military 

Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

 

1 In accordance with a pretrial agreement and for the benefit of Appellant’s family, the 

convening authority deferred the adjudged forfeitures until action and waived mandatory forfeitures for a period of six months, Appellant’s release from confinement, or the 

expiration of Appellant’s term of service, whichever was less.
United States v. Getz, No. ACM 39006

2

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 

59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). Accordingly, the approved 

findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

KURT J. BRUBAKER

Clerk of the Court
# SNR01
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Infinite  Group,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
S. Smith,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

      A signed  original  of this  written  statement  has been  provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.



May 12, 2006                 /s/  MICHAEL S. SMITH
                             ---------------------
                             Michael S. Smith
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### NEVILLE et al. v. AMERICAN BARGE LINE CO.

No. 186.

United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

Nov. 28, 1951.

*119Hymen Schlesinger, Pittsburgh, Pa., for libellants.

J. Roland Johnston, Thorp, Reed & Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent.

STEWART, District Judge.

Libellants brought this action to recover damages resulting from an injury allegedly sustained by the libellant, Beulah L. Neville, while working on a vessel owned and operated by the respondent. Pursuant to Admiralty Rule 31, 28 U.S.C., libellants directed interrogatories to the respondent. ■Objections have been filed by the respondent to some of these interrogatories, and it is these obj ections which are now before the Court for disposition.

Respondent’s objections relate to the ■scope of interrogatories under the Admiralty Rules, and, specifically, are to the effect that some of the interrogatories are irrelevant and immaterial to any issuable fact; that some call for opinions; and that some •constitute mere fishing expeditions. The Admiralty Rules have no specific provision relating to the scope of interrogatories thereunder, and the Courts are divided on the question of whether the tests of Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., should be applied. However, we believe that the better view is that Admiralty Rules 31, 32 and 32C(b) (2) should be construed in harmony with Rules 26, 30, 33 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Cleary Brothers v. Christie Scow Corporation, 2d Cir., 1949, 176 F.2d 370. The tests applicable in determining whether the interrogatories fall within their proper scope under Rules 26(b) and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been set forth by this Court in Mall Tool Company v. Sterling Varnish Company and Blaw-Knox Company, D.C., 11 F.R.D. 576.

Applying these tests, it seems to us that the objections to interrogatories numbered 7, 13(b), 13(c), 13(d), 13(g), 14, 15(b) and 22(c) should be overruled; however, the respondent will be directed to answer interrogatories numbered 13(b), 13(c), 13(d), 13(g), 14, 15(b) and 22(c) only so far as those matters are within the knowledge of the respondent and can be ascertained without extended research or compilation of data and information not readily known to it.

The objection to interrogatory number 11 will be sustained, and the objection to interrogatory number 23 will be sustained in part. With respect to interrogatory number 23, the respondent will be directed to state the movements of the vessel from this date until and during the course of the trial if the case is reached for trial during the present trial period. If the case is not reached for trial during the present trial period, the respondent will be directed to state the movements of the vessel for the week immediately preceding the date of trial and during the course of the trial.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-39956), Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-68082)
and Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-70148) and related Prospectuses of UbiquiTel
Inc., of our report dated February 29, 2000, with respect to the financial
statements of the Spokane District (wholly owned by Sprint Spectrum L.P.),
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of UbiquiTel Inc. for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
March 20, 2002
Order entered September 19, 2106

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00640

- CR

EDGAR MIGUEL GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Cr iminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15

- 20811

- H



### O RDER

The reporter’s record, due August 31, 2016, ha s not been filed. The Court ORDERS the

trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant has been depriv ed of the

reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosec ute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective
repre sentation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each cou rt reporter who

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a recor d, containing the written findings of fact,

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal

shall be reinstated t hirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
#### NATIONAL TRANSFORMER CORPORATION v. RANNEY.

Civ. No. 24549.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

Jan. 17, 1950.

See also D.C., 86 F.Supp. 57.

F. O. Richey, Cleveland, Ohio, Samuel E. Darby, Jr., New York City, for plaintiff.

Bates, Teare & McBean, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

JONES, Chief Judge.

This action was brought by plaintiff under the Declaratory Judgments Act, 28 U. S.C.A. §§ 2201, 2202, to test the validity of defendant’s patent.

Plaintiff has served 18 interrogatories on the defendant and defendant objects to Nos. 1 to 7, inclusive, 10, 11, and 14 to 17, inclusive.

All objections go to *the relevancy*of the interrogatories which request information about defendant’s relationship with the France Manufacturing Company and information about the issuing, reissuing and licensing of the patent in question. Defendant claims that since the validity of the patent is the only issue, all of the above information is irrelevant.

Plaintiff claims that the patent is invalid because the chief engineer of the France Company and not the defendant developed the subject matter which formed the basis of defendant’s patent. The information relating to defendant’s connection with the France Company and the issuing and licensing of the patent would, if produced, at least tend to support plaintiff’s claim that the chief engineer and not the defendant developed the patented subject, and it might prove that fact conclusively. Since the information seems relevant or calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, the objections will be overrul-c-d.
ex10-73.htm


Exhibit 10.73







AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO


MASTER AGREEMENT FOR JOINT DEVELOPMENT VEHICLE







THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of the 15th day of August, 2012 (the “Amendment No. 1 Effective Date”) by and between Unigene Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Unigene”) and Nordic Bioscience Clinical Development A/S, a Danish limited liability company (“Nordic”), and amends that certain Master Agreement for Joint Development Vehicle between Unigene and Nordic dated October 5, 2011 (the “Original Agreement” and collectively with this Amendment, the “Agreement”).  For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 



	
1. 

	
Amendment to the Original Agreement.  The definition of “Unigene Contribution” set forth in Section 1.47 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:







 


““Unigene Contribution” shall mean the sum of $50,000 contributed to NU-Co. by Unigene.”


 



	
2. 

	
Amendment to the Original Agreement.  The definition of “Nordic Contribution” set forth in Section 1.25 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:







 


““Nordic Contribution” shall mean the sum of $950,000 contributed to NU-Co. by Nordic in exchange for 50% of the equity of NU-Co.”








	
3.

	
Miscellaneous.  This Amendment is hereby incorporated into and made part of the Original Agreement, and is subject to all of the terms and conditions set forth in the Original Agreement; provided, however, that in the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Original Agreement, the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment shall control.  This Amendment and the Original Agreement together represent the entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and thereof, and supersede all prior representations, discussions, negotiations and agreements relating to such subject matter.







 


Each of the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives.








	
UNIGENE LABORATORIES, INC.

	
NORDIC BIOSCIENCE CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT A/S   







 




	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	
 /s/ Ashleigh Palmer

	 	By:	
/s/ Morten Karsdal 

	 
	Name:  	Ashleigh Palmer	 	Name:	Morten Karsdal 	 
	Title: 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 







 


 


 


1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, dated
the date of this Certification (the "Report"), I, Connie Ayres LaPlante,
the Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


Date:  February 13, 2004             By: /s/ Connie Ayres LaPlante
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Connie Ayres LaPlante
                                         Treasurer
                                         (Chief Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to First Federal Bancorp, Inc., and will be retained by First
Federal Bancorp, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
  "Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated
  June 20, 2003, in the Registration Statement and related
  Prospectus of the UBS Pathfinders Trust, Treasury and
  Growth Stock Series Twenty Three.
  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
  New York, New York
  July 7, 2003
Exhibit 32.2








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Erin D. Pickens, as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 16, 2010




By:  /s/ Erin D. Pickens


Erin D. Pickens


Senior Vice President &


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# table14full08

&8Page &P of &N
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5423 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5423

          For the relief of Rosario Amato and Salvatore Amato.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 24, 2004

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          For the relief of Rosario Amato and Salvatore Amato.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ROSARIO AMATO AND SALVATORE 
              AMATO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Rosario Amato and Salvatore 
Amato shall each be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Rosario Amato or Salvatore Amato 
enters the United States before the filing deadline specified in 
subsection (c), the respective individual shall be considered to have 
entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 
eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Rosario Amato and Salvatore 
Amato, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 
reduce by 2, during the current or next following fiscal year, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the aliens' birth under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the aliens' birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Rosario Amato 
and Salvatore Amato shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
BPI 2012 10-K - EX-10.72






Exhibit 10.72
ADDENDUM TO THE SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN 
CAMPUS MANAGEMENT CORP® AND 
BRIDGEPOINT EDUCATION INC. 
Purpose of Addendum: Add Talisma® CRM
This Addendum, effective upon the mutual execution by the parties hereunder, is incorporated into and made a part of the Software License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) between Campus Management Corp. (“CMC”) and Bridgepoint Education, Inc. (“Customer”), dated as of March 2, 2004, as amended.  All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the License Agreement.  The License Agreement shall be amended, as follows:
1.    On June 29, 2012, Customer was granted an unlimited concurrent user license to use the Talisma CRM Licensed Program, as further described in Section 2 below, at its licensed Campuses under the License Agreement in the North American territory.  Concurrent Users is defined as users simultaneously logged into Talisma CRM.
2.    The Talisma CRM consists of the following modules and limitations:
a.    Constituent Interaction Hub
b.    Process Workflow
c.    Campaign (includes unlimited campaign targets)
d.    SMS Text Messaging (Excludes SMS Provider Transaction Costs)
e.    Portal
f.    Application Management
g.    Event Management
h.    Payment Gateway
i.    Print
j.    Territory Assignment
k.    Import Utility
l.    Software Developers Kit (SDK)
3.    The License Fee for the unlimited license to Talisma CRM, is as follows:
	
		
	License
	Cost

	Talisma CRM
	       $[***]

	Less payment received for 250 licenses purchased on 6/18/09
	  ($[***])

	Less additional discount
	($[***])

	TOTAL
	$[***]




4.$[***] ([***]%) of the License Fee above is due and payable with the execution of this agreement.  $[***] ([***]%) of the License Fee is due and payable by February 28th 2013.
Except as expressly stated herein, all other terms of the License Agreement, as amended, remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
[Signature Page Follows]
[***] Confidential portions of this document have been redacted and filed separately with the Commission.











BRIDGEPOINT EDUCATION, INC.         CAMPUS MANAGEMENT CORP.
By:     /s/ Daniel J. Devine            By:     /s/ Anders Nessen    
Print: Daniel J. Devine                Print: Anders Nessen    
Title: CFO                    Title: CFO    
Date: 6/29/12                    Date: 6/29/12
Case 1:11-mc-00165-JEI -JS Document 1 Filed 06/13/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 1
Case 1:11-mc-00165-JEI -JS Document 1 Filed 06/13/11 Page 2 of 11 PageID: 2
Case 1:11-mc-00165-JEI -JS Document 1 Filed 06/13/11 Page 3 of 11 PageID: 3
Case 1:11-mc-00165-JEI -JS Document 1 Filed 06/13/11 Page 4 of 11 PageID: 4
Case 1:11-mc-00165-JEI -JS Document 1 Filed 06/13/11 Page 5 of 11 PageID: 5
Case 1:11-mc-00165-JEI -JS Document 1 Filed 06/13/11 Page 6 of 11 PageID: 6
Case 1:11-mc-00165-JEI -JS Document 1 Filed 06/13/11 Page 7 of 11 PageID: 7
Case 1:11-mc-00165-JEI -JS Document 1 Filed 06/13/11 Page 8 of 11 PageID: 8
Case 1:11-mc-00165-JEI -JS Document 1 Filed 06/13/11 Page 9 of 11 PageID: 9
Case 1:11-mc-00165-JEI -JS Document 1 Filed 06/13/11 Page 10 of 11 PageID: 10
Case 1:11-mc-00165-JEI -JS Document 1 Filed 06/13/11 Page 11 of 11 PageID: 11
# Labor Force Characteristics of Foreign-born Workers

"The Foreign-born Workers: Labor Force Characteristics release compares the labor force characteristics of the foreign born with those of their native-born counterparts.  These estimates are based on data from the Current Population Survey (CPS).  This release contains demographic, labor force, unemployment, occupation, and earnings data for the foreign-born population in the United States.  Issued annually.  For more information, visit https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm#foreignborn."

- Unemployment rate for the foreign born in the United States edges up to 3.6% in 2023
- Unemployment rate for the foreign born declines to 3.4% in 2022
- Unemployment rate for the foreign born declines to 5.6% in 2021
- Unemployment rate for the foreign born increases to 9.2% in 2020
- Unemployment rate for the foreign born declines to 3.1% in 2019
- Unemployment rate for the foreign born declines to 3.5% in 2018
- Unemployment rate for the foreign born is 4.1% in 2017, down from 4.3% in 2016
- Unemployment rate for the foreign born declines to 4.3% in 2016
- Unemployment rate for the foreign born declines to 4.9% in 2015
- Unemployment rate for the foreign born declines to 5.6% in 2014
- Unemployment rate for the foreign born declines to 6.9% in 2013
- Unemployment rate for the foreign born falls to 8.1 percent in 2012