alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Watsco, Inc. (Watsco) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ana M. Menendez, the Chief Financial Officer of Watsco,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Watsco.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ana M. MenendezAna M. Menendez Chief Financial Officer March 1, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Watsco and will be retained by Watsco and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Watsco for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Under age 17 and NAICS 11

Fatal occupational injuries to workers under the age of 18 in the agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting sector by event or exposure, 2015-2016 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries to workers under the age of 18 in the agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting sector by event or exposure, 2015-2016		

Fatal occupational injuries to workers under the age of 18 in the agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting sector by event or exposure, 2015-2016 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries to workers under the age of 18 in the agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting sector by event or exposure, 2015-2016		

Page &P
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November      12, 2009   | /s/      Michael S. Smith          |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                               | Michael      S. Smith              |
|                               | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                               | (Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
Exhibit 10.20

 

MOCON, INC.

 

DESCRIPTION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR
 COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

 

Retainer and Meeting Fees.    Each of the non-employee directors of MOCON, Inc. receives an annual retainer fee of $13,000, paid in equal quarterly installments, without regard to the number of board of directors or committee meetings held or attended by such director, along with an additional $600 for each board meeting or committee meeting attended in person or via telephone. The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual retainer fee of $3,000, while the  Chairmen of the Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee receive an additional $1,000 and $800, respectively, each year.

 

Stock Options.    Non-employee directors are granted options to purchase shares of MOCON common stock from time to time in the sole discretion of the board of directors.

 

Director Retirement Plan.    Pursuant to the MOCON, Inc. Director Retirement Plan, a non-employee director who has served on the board of directors of MOCON for at least five years will, upon retirement, receive an amount equal to the annual retainer fee such director would have been entitled to receive during the fiscal year in which such director’s retirement occurs. This payment, however, will not be made to a director who, following his or her retirement, continues to serve as a consultant to MOCON or any of its subsidiaries. Any amount payable under this retirement plan will be paid as determined by the MOCON board of directors in its sole discretion following such director’s retirement.

 

Reimbursement of Expenses.    Non-employee directors are reimbursed for actual expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings.
#### Samuel G. West, Respondent, *v.*The New York Transportation Co., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

June, 1905.)

Negligence — Plaintiff ran into cab — Defendant not liable.

Where plaintiff, standing on a street corner, saw defendant’s electric cab coming down the street at a moderate pace, and in crossing the street without looking at or for the cab, either walked or ran into it, striking it on the side and was injured, the defendant is not chargeable with negligence. ,

Appeal by defendant from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff in the City Court of the city of New York, after a trial before the court and a jury, and also from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Arthur K. Wing, for appellant.

Charles Schloemann (John C. Robinson, of counsel), for respondent.

Scott, J.

It is not easy to see upon what the jury predicated a finding of negligence on the part of defendant’s driver. The plaintiff started to cross Eighth avenue, at the northeast- corner of Forty-second street going from east to west. Before he left the curb he saw the defendant’s electric cab coming down Eighth avenue at a moderate pace. When he had reached the north-bound or easterly track he looked south, as he says, to see if a car was coming, and seeing none proceeded and almost immediately walked or ran into the cab, and was thrown down. He did not look at or for the cab after leaving the curb. There is no evidence that the cab increased its speed, and it must have been *604running quite slowly because it was stopped within a very few feet. It is true that there is some evidence that no bell was rung by the driver, but that seems to be unimportant because the plaintiff had seen the cab coming and, therefore, needed no warning of its approach. There is also some evidence that the cab had changed its course before the plaintiff struck it. This is disputed and even if true is not so significant as it might have been if the cab had run into plaintiff. The universal testimony is that plaintiff ran into the cab, striking it on the side. The irresistible conclusion from the evidence is either that plaintiff forgot all about the - cab and hastened heedlessly across the street, or else that those witnesses speak truthfully who say that he came suddenly out from behind an uptown car. In either event we find no evidence sufficient to charge the defendant. The damages too are, to say the least, very liberal. The plaintiff's actual loss in money was small and his injuries properly traceable to the accident were not serious. The case presented a proper case for the granting of the motion for a new trial.

MacLean, J., concurs.

Dug-ro', J., concurs in result.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Exhibit 32 (a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Garry O. Ridge,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WD-40 Company (the Company), have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K and Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012 (the Report).
For purposes of Section 1350 of Title 18, United States Code, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 29, 2012



/s/ GARRY O. RIDGEGarry O. RidgePresident and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements No’s. 333-81504 and 333-4430 on Form S-8 of our reports relating to the consolidated financial statements of OPNET Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the change in method of accounting for uncertain tax positions to conform to Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income*Taxes, and thechange in method of accounting for share-based payments to conform to FASB No. 123 (revised 2004), *Share Based Payment*), and the effectiveness of OPNET Technologies, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, dated June 9, 2008,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of OPNET Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2008. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHELLP 

McLean, Virginia 

June 9, 2008
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Susan M. Atkins, certify that:1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K for the year endedAugust 31, 2005 of IMPRESO, INC. (the “Report”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by the Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in the Report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthe Report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by the Report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: December 14, 2005 /s/ Susan M. Atkins **Susan M. Atkins**    **Chief Financial Officer**
1

The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3160

___________

Lillie J. Williams, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Des Arc City Police Department; *

Mayhar, Des Arc Police Department; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Burnett, Des Arc Police Department, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: July 13, 2006

Filed: July 17, 2006

___________

Before BYE, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Lillie Williams appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint. After de novo review, see Springdale Educ. Ass’n v. Springdale Sch.

Dist., 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir. 1998), we conclude that the dismissal was proper.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,262,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,604,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                   747,223
<INVENTORY>                                  2,303,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,644,998
<PP&E>                                       2,314,083
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,532,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,969,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,670,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       127,190
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,131,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,969,769
<SALES>                                      6,124,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,124,867
<CGS>                                        4,057,809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,739,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (26,883)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                233,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            231,707
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   231,707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
    In
connection with the Annual Report of Communicate.com Inc. (“Communicate”) on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Jeffs,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Communicate and a member of the Board
of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
   (1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
    */s/
David Jeffs*
 David
Jeffs
 Chief
Executive Officer
   March 30,
2005
  
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
    In
connection with the Annual Report of Communicate.com Inc. (“Communicate”) on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cameron Pan,
Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of Communicate, certify,
pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   (1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
    */s/
Cameron Pan*
 Cameron
Pan
 Chief
Financial Officer
   March 30,
2005
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following table sets forth the significant
subsidiaries of Watsco, Inc. as of December 31, 2012, and their respective incorporation jurisdictions. The names of various other wholly owned subsidiaries have been omitted. None of the foregoing omitted subsidiaries, considered either alone
or in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, constitutes a significant subsidiary.



|                                  |  |                                              |  |                     |     |  
|--------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | --- | -
|Name of Subsidiary                |  | State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation |  | Percent ofOwnership |    
|                                  |  |                                             
|Baker Distributing Company LLC    |  | Delaware                                     |  |                     | 100 | %
|Carrier Enterprise Canada, L.P.   |  | Ontario, Canada                              |  |                     | 60  | %
|Carrier Enterprise, LLC           |  | Delaware                                     |  |                     | 70  | %
|Carrier Enterprise Northeast, LLC |  | Delaware                                     |  |                     | 60  | %
|East Coast Metal Distributors LLC |  | Delaware                                     |  |                     | 100 | %
|Gemaire Distributors LLC          |  | Delaware                                     |  |                     | 100 | %
|Heating & Cooling Supply LLC      |  | California                                   |  |                     | 100 | %
|Watsco Canada, Inc.               |  | New Brunswick, Canada                        |  |                     | 100 | %
IV 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 154

Commending the Prime Minister of Great Britain for his stalwart leadership 

and unwavering support of the United States in the effort to disarm 

Saddam Hussein of weapons of mass destruction and free the Iraqi 

people of the scourge of brutal dictatorship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2003

Mr. GALLEGLY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION

Commending the Prime Minister of Great Britain for his 

stalwart leadership and unwavering support of the 

United States in the effort to disarm Saddam Hussein 

of weapons of mass destruction and free the Iraqi people 

of the scourge of brutal dictatorship.

Whereas British Prime Minister Tony Blair has shown courageous leadership in cooperating with the United States in 

the effort to disarm Saddam Hussein of weapons of mass 

destruction; 

Whereas Prime Minister Tony Blair has shown great fortitude in championing the urgent necessity to disarm 

Saddam Hussein; 
2

•HRES 154 IH 

Whereas Prime Minister Tony Blair has been a steadfast 

supporter of the United States throughout the United 

Nations Security Council deliberations on United Nations 

Resolution 1441; 

Whereas Prime Minister Tony Blair has joined the United 

States in condemning Saddam Hussein for subjecting the 

Iraqi people to unconscionable brutality and human 

rights violations; 

Whereas Prime Minister Tony Blair has committed his country’s military to ensuring that Iraq is disarmed of weapons of mass destruction and the Iraqi people are free 

from Saddam Hussein’s tyrannical rule; 

Whereas the combined efforts of President George W. Bush 

and Prime Minister Tony Blair to rid the world of Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction are in the 

best interest of Iraq’s regional neighbors, the international community, and the Iraqi people; and 

Whereas the United States and Great Britain stand firm in 

collective resolve to rid the world of Saddam Hussein’s 

weapons of mass destruction and free the Iraqi people 

from the despotic rule of Saddam Hussein: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives com2 mends British Prime Minister Tony Blair for his leader3 ship and cooperation in the effort to disarm Saddam Hus4 sein of weapons of mass destruction and free the Iraqi 

5 people from Saddam Hussein’s brutal dictatorship.

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 982

To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations issued by the 

Government of American Samoa. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2003

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL

To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations 

issued by the Government of American Samoa.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TAX TREATMENT OF BONDS 

4 AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS ISSUED BY GOV5 ERNMENT OF AMERICAN SAMOA. 

6 (a) EXEMPTION OF ALL BONDS FROM INCOME TAX7 ATION BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—Sub8 section (b) of section 202 of Public Law 98–454 (48 

9 U.S.C. 1670) is amended to read as follows: 
2

•HR 982 IH 

1 ‘‘(b) EXEMPTION OF ALL BONDS FROM INCOME

2 TAXATION BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The interest on any bond 

4 or other obligation issued by or on behalf of the 

5 Government of American Samoa shall be exempt 

6 from taxation by the Government of American 

7 Samoa and the governments of any of the several 

8 States, the District of Columbia, any territory or 

9 possession of the United States, and any subdivision 

10 thereof. 

11 ‘‘(2) EXEMPTION APPLICABLE ONLY TO INCOME

12 TAXES.—The exemption provided by paragraph (1) 

13 shall not apply to gift, estate, inheritance, legacy, 

14 succession, or other wealth transfer taxes.’’. 

15 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

16 This Act shall apply to obligations issued after the 

17 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[No. 55604-5-I.

Division One.

December 19, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Stephen Shane Anderson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 04-1-01214-1, Gerald L. Knight, J., entered January 5, 2005. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.