alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                             |             |              
|-------------------------------------------- | ----------- | -------------
|HSBC Finance Corporation                     |             |              
|Household Automotive Trust IV, Series 2000-1 |             |              
|                                             |             |              
|                                             |             |              
|Original Principal                           |             |              
|Class A-1                                    | 142,000,000 |              
|Class A-2                                    | 153,000,000 |              
|Class A-3                                    | 169,000,000 |              
|Class A-4                                    | 163,452,000 |              
|Number of Bonds (000's)                      |             |              
|Class A-1                                    | 142,000     |              
|Class A-2                                    | 153,000     |              
|Class A-3                                    | 169,000     |              
|Class A-4                                    | 163,452     |              
|                                             |             |              
|                                             |             |              
|                                             |             |              
|                                             |             | 2004 Totals  
|                                             |             |              
|CLASS A                                      |             |              
|Class A-1 Principal Distribution             |             | 0.00         
|Class A-1 Interest Distribution              |             | 0.00         
|                                             |             |              
|Class A-2 Principal Distribution             |             | 0.00         
|Class A-2 Interest Distribution              |             | 0.00         
|                                             |             |              
|Class A-3 Principal Distribution             |             | 0.00         
|Class A-3 Interest Distribution              |             | 0.00         
|                                             |             |              
|Class A-4 Principal Distribution             |             | 94,493,188.14
|Class A-4 Interest Distribution              |             | 3,867,721.13
|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |

|                                                               |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Richard E. Bagley                                         |
| Richard      E. Bagley, President and Chief      Financial Officer |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting      Officer)                  |
| March 17,      2010                                                |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 700 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 700

 To amend the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure to require written 
           opinions in certain cases, and for other purposes.

ERR11*_________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure to require written 
           opinions in certain cases, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Openness in Justice Act''.

SEC. 2. WRITTEN OPINIONS IN APPELLATE CASES.

    The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure are amended by inserting 
after Rule 48 the following new rule:
``Rule 49. Written opinions
    ``(a) When Required.--A written opinion that expounds on the law as 
applied to the facts of the case, and explains the judicial reasons 
upon which the judgment is based, shall be issued in connection with a 
judgment entered in each of the following cases:
            ``(1) A civil action removed from State court.
            ``(2) A civil action wherein jurisdiction is founded solely 
        upon diversity of citizenship, in which the matter in 
        controversy exceeds the sum or value of $100,000.
            ``(3) Any appeal regarding the use of a court's inherent 
        powers.
    ``(b) Parties' Right to Request.--Each party on direct appeal may 
request a written opinion referred to in subsection (a).''.
                                 <all>

                                                              H. R.    

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

   Mr.     introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                            Committee on    

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
```
II 

Calendar No. 453

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 856 

[Report No. 108–243] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

JUNE 19, 2003

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

MARCH 9, 2004

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to revise a repayment contract with the Tom Green County Water Control and Improvement District No. 1, San Angelo project, 

Texas, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 856 RS 

1 SECTION 1. TOM GREEN COUNTY WATER CONTROL AND IM2 PROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1; REPAYMENT 

3 PERIOD EXTENDED. 

4 The Secretary of the Interior may revise the repay5 ment contract with the Tom Green County Water Control 

6 and Improvement District No. 1 numbered 14–06–500–

7 369, by extending the period authorized for repayment of 

8 reimbursable constructions costs of the San Angelo project 

9 from 40 years to 50 years. 

Calendar No. 453

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 856

[Report No. 108–243] 

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to revise 

a repayment contract with the Tom Green County Water Control and Improvement District No. 1, San Angelo project, Texas, and for other purposes. 

MARCH 9, 2004

Reported without amendment
ALASKA

CALIF.

ARIZ.

NEV.

N.M.

HAWAII

ARK.

TEXAS

COLO.

UTAH

OKLA.

KAN. MO.

IDAHO

WYO.

ORE.

WASH.

MONT.

IOWA NEB.

S.D.

MINN.

N.D.

ALA.

LA.

MISS.

FLA.

TENN.

ILL.

KY.

GA.

S.C.

N.C.

VA.

W.VA.

D.C.

IND.

OHIO

MICH.

PA.

WIS.

MD.

DEL.

N.Y.

N.J.

VT.

CONN.

MASS. N.H.

R.I.

MAINE

New England

Middle

Atlantic

East

North Central

West

North Central

Pacific

Mountain

South Central

West

East

South Central

South 

Atlantic

Employment change

 2.5% or above

 1.6% - 2.4%

 1.0% - 1.5%

 0.9% or below

Chart 1-11. Nonfarm employment rose across most of the 

Nation in 2005

NOTE: Percent change in nonfarm payroll employment from 2004 to 2005, annual averages.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

• Employment increased in 48 states and the District of Columbia, with 37 states 

and the District posting increases of 1.0 percent or more over the year. 

Employment was down in two states and unchanged in one (Maine).

• The largest over-the-year increases in employment occurred in Nevada (6.2 

percent) and Arizona (5.3 percent).

• Reflecting the impact of the Gulf Coast hurricanes, Louisiana posted the largest 

percentage decrease (-2.5 percent) in employment from 2004 to 2005. 

Michigan registered the only other decrease (-0.2 percent).

Chart 1-11. Nonfarm employment rose across most of the 

Nation in 2005
# cpsaat05
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 557 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 557

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain manufacturing equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain manufacturing equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking heading 
9902.84.89 and inserting in numerical sequence the following new 
heading:

      

``    9902.84.89    Sector mold       Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     press machines                                                          31/2005          ''
                     to be used in                                                                             .
                     production of
                     radial tires
                     designed for
                     off-the highway
                     use with a rim
                     measuring 63.5
                     cm or more in
                     diameter
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     4011.20.10,
                     4011.61.00,
                     4011.63.00,
                     4011.69.00,
                     4011.92.00,
                     4011.94.40, or
                     4011.99.45),
                     numerically
                     controlled, or
                     parts thereof
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     8477.51.00 or
                     8477.90.85)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 845

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from the gross 

income of interest on bank loans made to churches and religious organizations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. ROYCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from the gross income of interest on bank loans made 

to churches and religious organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Faith5 based Lending Improvement Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF INTEREST ON BANKING LOANS 

7 MADE TO CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS ORGA8 NIZATIONS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap10 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
2

•HR 845 IH 

1 items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended 

2 by inserting after section 139 the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 139A. BANKING LOANS TO CHURCHES AND RELI4 GIOUS ORGANIZATIONS. 

5 ‘‘Gross income shall not include interest received 

6 from loans by banks (as defined in section 581) to church7 es and religious organizations described in section 

8 501(c)(3) that are exempt from tax under section 501(a).’’

9 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

10 for such part III is amended by adding at the end the 

11 following new item:

‘‘Sec. 139A. Banking loans to churches and religious organizations.’’

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

14 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 693 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 693

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
 certain death gratuity payments to members of the uniformed services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

Mr. Jones of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. Cole, Mr. Wilson of South 
    Carolina, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Snyder, Mr. Forbes, Mr. 
  Abercrombie, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. Pomeroy, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Miller of 
 Florida, Mr. Hayes, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Everett, 
   Mrs. Bono, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Simmons, Mr. Dicks, Mr. Schrock, Mr. 
    Ackerman, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Kolbe, Mr. 
 Gibbons, Mr. Kline, Mr. Mica, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Terry, Mr. Calvert, and 
  Mr. Reyes) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
 certain death gratuity payments to members of the uniformed services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Death Gratuity Improvement 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF CERTAIN DEATH GRATUITY PAYMENTS 
              TO MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 134(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain military benefits) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Exception for death gratuity increase.--
                Subparagraph (A) shall be applied by substituting 
                `December 31, 1991' for `September 9, 1986' in the case 
                of a death gratuity payable under chapter 75 of title 
                10, United States Code, with respect to a death 
                occurring after September 10, 2001.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subparagraph (A) of section 134(b)(3) of 
such Code is amended by striking ``subparagraph (B)'' and inserting 
``subparagraphs (B) and (C)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid with respect to deaths occurring after September 
10, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
SECOND AMENDMENT
TO
OFFICE LEASE AGREEMENT
 Amendment Lessor Lessee
  Exhibit A Property
  2004 Lease 2005 Amendment Lease
 Existing Expiration Date Amended Expiration Date
    Confirmation of Lease
 - 1 -




---



##### 



Term
 Rent
 October 1, 2009  September 30, 2010
    
    $
    30.50October 1, 2010  September 30, 2011
    
    $
    31.50October 1, 2011  December 31, 2011
    
    $
    32.50
 Lessees Security Deposit
 Agency/Commission Commission
 Offset Provision
 Cost of Parking
 - 2 -




---



##### 



No Implied Modifications
 Entire Agreement
 Execution in Counterparts
  LESSOR:SELIG HOLDINGS COMPANY,
L.L.C, a Delaware limited
liability companyBy:
    
    /s/ Peter ParkerMartin Selig, a member and its manageras attorney in-factLESSEE:DENDREON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Greg SchiffmanName:
    
    Greg SchiffmanTitle:
    
    CFO
 - 3 -




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
  th
 - 4 -
#### Tanner *v.*The Mutual Benefit Building Association.

Atkinson, J. — 1. While the head of a'family to -whom a homestead has been set apart has no power to “waive homestead” so as to subject the homestead estate to the payment of debts for which it would not be otherwise liable, the mere insertion of such waiver in a promissory note made by the head of the ¡family does not invalidate the note and render the same void as being contrary to the policy of the law.

2. Inasmuch as it appears from an inspection of the record that the judgment in this case was excessive to the extent of six dollars and ten cents, direction is given that this excess be written off, and that thereupon the judgment stand affirmed.

November 26, 1894.

Complaint on note. Before Judge Yan Epps. City ■court of Atlanta. July term, 1894.

*Judgment affirmed, with direction.*

*529Suit was brought on a promissory note containing the usual waiver of homestead, dated Februaiy 1,1898. Defendant pleaded: The note is illegal and void, beiug a •contract against the policy of the law, in that it contains a waiver of homestead or exemption right of defendant or his family, as against this debt or any renewal thereof. His wife had filed in the court of ordinary a schedule for the exemption of realty and personalty, under the •code, §2040 *et seq.,*for the benefit of her family; and in the schedule particularly set fórth the land covered by .a mortgage made by defendant to secure the note sued •on; which schedule was approved and recorded on October 7,1878. The property so set apart is in the nature •of a trust estate; and nothing appears in plaintiff’s declaration to authorize a'judgment of the city court against said trust property. Defendant’s wife has pending in the superior coui’t a petition filed by her, for injunction and other relief; which court, having full jurisdiction of the parties and subject-matter of this controversy, should be allowed to retain jurisdiction, to do full and complete justice, etc. This plea was stricken on demurrer, and judgment rendered by the court for the plaintiff'.

The declaration contained a count for $6.10 taxes paid by plaintiff at defendant’s request. By inadvertence this sum was included in the amount of the judgment rendered, the only question argued and decided by the court below being on the plea. The bill of exceptions was certified in vacation.

Johnson & Pledger and Thomas & Thomas, for plaintiff in error. James H. Gilbert, *contra.*
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report"), I, Dennis C.
      Cossey, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the
      best
      of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May
      22, 2007




By: /s/
      Dennis C.
      Cossey


Name:
      Dennis C. Cossey


Title:
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

The State of Texas

,

State

,

v.

George Frank Diamos, III

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 322

- C R

Appeal from the

120 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20130D05419 )

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the State’s emergency motion to stay proceedings pending

resolution of the State’s appeal from the trial court’s order suppressing evidence. According to

the motion, the underlying case is set for a jury trial at 8:30 a.m. on December 9, 2016. The

State is entitled to a stay in the proceedings pursuant to Article 44.01(e) of the Texas Code of

Criminal Procedure. See T EX .C ODE C RIM .P ROC .A NN

. art. 44.01(e). Accordingly, the State’s

motion is GRANTED. With the exception of matters related to bail, the trial court is directed to

stay all proceedings in ca use number 20130D05419 pending resolution of this appeal or further

order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8 th day of Decem ber, 2016

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
# 2009

# 2010

# 2011

# 2013

# 2014

# 2015

# 2017
Opinion issued September 4, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 4
- 00639
- CR

——————————— IN RE DONALD WAYNE HEROD , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Donald Wayne Herod , has filed a pro se petition for writ of
mandamus , and motion for leave to file, seeking to compel the respondent trial
court to rule on his “ motion to discover the blood sample , ” which he claims was filed under various statutes, including Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article
11.073. 1

1 Relator identifies the respondent only as the 339th District Court of Harris County , but lists the underlying ca u se number 1152281 which corresponds to The State of2

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a) , (d)

. We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
PER CURI AM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes

. Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Texas v. Donald Wayne Herod , the Honorable Caprice Cosper presiding . We affirmed relator’s conviction under that cause number for felony driving while intoxicated. Donald Wayne Herod v. S tate , No. 01

- 08

- 00908

- CR, 2010 WL 1981577, at *5 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] May 13, 2010, pet. ref’d).
# File information

# Plan characteristics

# Coinsurance & out-of-pocket

# Annual deductible

# High & nonhigh deductible

# Services provided

# Outpatient prescription drugs

# All data

# Appendix 1

# Appendix 2