alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered February 4 , 2015 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00583
- CV J. WAYNE JOHNSON, GO D'S TABERNACLE OF DE LIVERANCE, ET AL., Appellant s V. HERRING BANK, ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 11
- 15858



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee, Herring Bank’s January 30, 2015, motion to extend deadline for filing appellee’s brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellee, Herring Bank, to fi le its brief no later than February 4, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
ex10-7.htm


EXHIBIT 10.7












Compensation Arrangements with Thomas J. Flournoy







Neither Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. (“Company”), nor First Bank of Georgia (“Bank”), has a written employment agreement with Thomas J. Flournoy, Chief Financial Officer of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. and First Bank of Georgia.  Mr. Flournoy’s current (2013) salary is $183,750 and Mr. Flournoy is eligible for an annual incentive award under the Bank’s Annual Incentive Plan, pursuant to which he received $42,000 for his performance in 2012.  See Exhibit 10.9 for a description of Mr. Flournoy’s Annual Incentive Plan.  Mr. Flournoy is eligible for stock option, restricted stock and other awards under the Company’s incentive plans as determined from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company.  In addition, Mr. Flournoy participates in the Bank’s medical, dental, life and disability insurance plans and he may participate in the Company’s 401(k) plan.







Mr. Flournoy entered into a Severance Protection Agreement with the Bank, which entitles him to certain payments following a change in control of the Company.  The Severance Protection Agreement was filed with the Company’s 8-K filing on June 26, 2009.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 972

To clarify the effective date of the modification of treatment for retirement 

annuity purposes of part-time service before April 7, 1986, of certain 

Department of Veterans Affairs health-care professionals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2003

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Ms. LEE, Mr. 

BROWN of Ohio, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. 

SERRANO, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. CORRINE

BROWN of Florida, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. FROST, Mr. 

SANDERS, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. KIND, Mrs. JONES of 

Ohio, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. STRICKLAND, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. OWENS, 

and Mr. FARR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To clarify the effective date of the modification of treatment 

for retirement annuity purposes of part-time service before April 7, 1986, of certain Department of Veterans 

Affairs health-care professionals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 972 IH 

1 SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE OF MODIFICATION OF TREAT2 MENT FOR RETIREMENT ANNUITY PURPOSES 

3 OF CERTAIN PART-TIME SERVICE OF CER4 TAIN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

5 HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS. 

6 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The effective date of the 

7 amendment made by section 132 of the Department of 

8 Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs Enhancement Act 

9 of 2001 (Public Law 107–135; 115 Stat. 2454) shall be 

10 January 23, 2002, in the case of health care professionals 

11 referred to in subsection (c) of section 7426 of title 38, 

12 United States Code (as so amended), who retire on or 

13 after that date and in the case of health care professionals 

14 referred to in such subsection (c) who retired before such 

15 date, but after April 7, 1986. 

16 (b) RECOMPUTATION OF ANNUITY.—The Office of 

17 Personnel Management shall recompute the annuity of 

18 each health-care professional described in the first sen19 tence of subsection (c) of section 7426 of title 38, United 

20 States Code (as so amended), who retired before January 

21 23, 2002, but after April 7, 1986, in order to take into 

22 account the amendment made by section 132 of the De23 partment of Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs En24 hancement Act of 2001. Such recomputation shall be ef-
3

•HR 972 IH 

1 fective with respect to annuities paid for months after 

2 January 23, 2002.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36552-36553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17460]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, and 
Wisconsin)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, August 18, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, August 18, 2009, at 1 p.m. Central Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. 
For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin 
Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or

[[Page 36553]]

post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

     Dated: July 16, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-17460 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
# pg. 1

&8page &P of &N
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 732 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 732

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to make 
 volunteer members of the Civil Air Patrol eligible for Public Safety 
                        Officer death benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2003

Ms. Hooley of Oregon (for herself and Mr. Walden of Oregon) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to make 
 volunteer members of the Civil Air Patrol eligible for Public Safety 
                        Officer death benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Air Patrol Homeland Security 
Benefits Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF CIVIL AIR PATROL FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER DEATH 
              BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1204(8) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b(8)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (B);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) a volunteer civilian member of the Civil Air 
                Patrol who is engaged in--
                            ``(i) active service, rendered in 
                        performance or support of operational missions 
                        of the Civil Air Patrol under the direction of 
                        the Department of the Air Force, if such 
                        service has, and is performed consistent with, 
                        written authorization from competent authority 
                        that specifies a finite assignment and a finite 
                        period of time for such assignment; or
                            ``(ii) travel to or from such service.''.
    (b) Consultation.--Section 1205 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 3796c) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) In making determinations under section 1201 with respect to 
the eligibility of a volunteer civilian member of the Civil Air Patrol, 
the Bureau may consult with the Secretary of the Air Force and, if so, 
the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide to the Bureau such 
assistance and information as the Bureau considers necessary.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended August 2, 2008 of Stein Mart, Inc. (the Form 10-Q), I, James G. Delfs, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                           
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 10, 2008 |  | /s/ James G. Delfs                                        
|                         |  | James G. Delfs                                            
|                         |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer



17
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 97-KA-00776-SCT JESSIE LEE JONES

v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/19/97 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARCUS D. GORDON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:SCOTT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: EDMUND J. PHILLIPS ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: JOLENE M. LOWRY DISTRICT ATTORNEY: KEN TURNER NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - FELONY DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND RENDERED - 09/17/98 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED: 10/8/98

BEFORE SULLIVAN, P.J., MILLS AND WALLER, JJ.
WALLER, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

¶1. Jessie Lee Jones ("Jones") was convicted of two counts of uttering forgery by a Scott County jury. To sustain a conviction for uttering forgery the State must prove that the instrument in question was a "forged, altered, or counterfeit instrument" and that the defendant possessed an "intent to defraud." Miss. Code Ann. § 97-21-59 (1994). The record reveals, and the State concedes, that the necessary elements were not proven at trial. Therefore, this Court has no choice but to reverse and render Jones' conviction for the two counts of uttering forgery. ¶2. REVERSED AND RENDERED. PRATHER, C.J., SULLIVAN AND PITTMAN, P.JJ., BANKS, McRAE, ROBERTS, SMITH AND MILLS, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         511,871
<SECURITIES>                                   262,451
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,726)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               807,980
<PP&E>                                         130,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                (37,930)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,314,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,513
<BONDS>                                        243,452
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          575,314
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                     368,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,314,310
<SALES>                                          2,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,462
<CGS>                                            4,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,046
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (130,999)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (130,999)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (130,999)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.39)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1120 THOMAS E. QUESENBERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Pamela Meade Sargent, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00116-pms) Submitted: August 28, 2008 Decided: September 12, 2008 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Deborah K. Garton, HENSLEY, MUTH, GARTON & HAYES, Bluefield, West Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Sara Bugbee Winn, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia; Michael McGaughran, Regional Chief Counsel, Region III, William Reeser, Supervisory Attorney, Michelle Scotese, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Social Security Administration, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas E. Quesenberry appeals the magistrate judge’s order affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny Quesenberry a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. * We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater , 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, administrative record, and the materials submitted in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Quesenberry v. Astrue , No. 1:06-cv-00116-pms (W.D. Va. Oct. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 840

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow for the expansion 

of areas designated as renewal communities based on 2000 census data. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. QUINN (for himself, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. HOUGHTON, Ms. SLAUGHTER, 

and Mr. WALSH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow for 

the expansion of areas designated as renewal communities based on 2000 census data.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF DESIGNATED RENEWAL COM4 MUNITY AREA BASED ON 2000 CENSUS DATA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1400E of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to designation of renewal 

7 communities) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(g) EXPANSION OF DESIGNATED AREAS.—
2

•HR 840 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) EXPANSION BASED ON 2000 CENSUS.—At 

2 the request of the nominating entity with respect to 

3 a renewal community, the Secretary of Housing and 

4 Urban Development may expand the area of a re5 newal community to include any census tract—

6 ‘‘(A) which, at the time such community 

7 was nominated, met the requirements of this 

8 section for inclusion in such community but for 

9 the failure of such tract to meet 1 or more of 

10 the population and poverty rate requirements of 

11 this section using 1990 census data, and 

12 ‘‘(B) which meets all failed population and 

13 poverty rate requirements of this section using 

14 2000 census data. 

15 ‘‘(2) EXPANSION TO CERTAIN AREAS WHICH DO

16 NOT MEET POPULATION REQUIREMENTS.—

17 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—At the request of 1 or 

18 more local governments and the State or States 

19 in which an area described in subparagraph (B) 

20 is located, the Secretary of Housing and Urban 

21 Development may expand a designated area to 

22 include such area. 

23 ‘‘(B) AREA.—An area is described in this 

24 subparagraph if—
3

•HR 840 IH 

1 ‘‘(i) the area is adjacent to at least 1 

2 other area designated as a renewal commu3 nity, 

4 ‘‘(ii) the area has a population less 

5 than the population required under sub6 section (c)(2)(C), and 

7 ‘‘(iii) the area meets the requirements 

8 of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of sub9 section (c)(2) and subparagraph (A) of 

10 subsection (c)(3). 

11 ‘‘(3) APPLICABILITY.—Any expansion of a re12 newal community under this section shall take effect 

13 as provided in subsection (b).’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the 

16 amendments made by section 101 of the Community Re17 newal Tax Relief Act of 2000.

Æ
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 26, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-12-00260-CR

____________

REYNALDO VALDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 131407

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated sexual assault of a child. In 

accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court 

sentenced appellant on February 22, 2012, to confinement for ten years in the Institutional 

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of 

appeal. 

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the 

court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on 
2

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court’s certification. 

See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and McCally.

Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
Motion Granted, Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February

15, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00078-CV

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, 

PA, AND TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Appellants

V.

PAYNE & KELLER COMPANY, BY AND THROUGH ITS DULY 

APPOINTED RECEIVER, PETER D. PROTOPAPAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2023-70875

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from the denial by operation of law on January 25, 2024 of 

appellants’ motions to vacate the notice of domestication of a foreign order or 

judgment. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 35.003. On February 7, 2024, 

appellants filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a). The motion is granted.

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hassan, Poissant, and Wilson.
H. Res. 130

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 6, 2003.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

they are hereby, elected to the following standing committee

of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT:

Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. Green of Texas, Ms. Roybal-Allard,

and Mr. Doyle.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 14, 2022
No. 04-20-00599-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF CARLOS Y. BENAVIDES, JR. AND LETICIA R. BENAVIDES , From the County Court At Law No 1, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-PB6-000081-L2-A Honorable Hugo Martinez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice In this appeal, appellant raised numerous issues challenging six partial summary judgments. On February 24, 2022, this court heard oral arguments on two of appellant’s issues. Prior to submission of this appeal, this court issued an opinion in another appeal involving the same parties. See Benavides v. Alexander , No. 04-19-00318-CV, 2021 WL 5088742 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 3, 2021, pet. filed). After we issued our opinion in Benavides v. Alexander , the appellant filed a petition for review with the Texas Supreme Court. See Leticia Benavides v. Cristina B. Alexander, as Permanent Guardian of the Person of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr.; et al. ; No. 22-0173 (Tex.). Because it appeared the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution of some of the issues in Benavides v. Alexander

might have an impact on the present appeal, we abated the present appeal until the Supreme Court resolved Benavides v. Alexander . We also withdrew the submission date of February 24, 2022. On July 15, 2022, the Supreme Court denied appellant’s petition for review in Benavides v. Alexander

. On July 15, 2022, appellant filed an Unopposed Motion to Lift Abatement in which appellant stated she did not intend to file a motion for rehearing with the Supreme Court in Benavides v. Alexander . The motion is GRANTED. This appeal is REINSTATED on the court’s docket and will be SUBMITTED for consideration on October 18, 2022.It is so ORDERED on September 14, 2022.
PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT