alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE 
 OF REAL
PROPERTY AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY AND
ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (“Second Amendment”) between GREIT-SUTTER SQUARE, LP, a California limited partnership, (“Seller”), G REIT LIQUIDATING TRUST, a Maryland trust (“Seller Guarantor”), and CHEQUERS SUTTER SQUARE, LLC, a
California limited liability company (“Buyer”) (seller, Seller Guarantor and Buyer sometimes hereafter referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties”), is made and entered into as the latest date set
forth below. 
 WHEREAS, the Parties hereto have entered into a certain Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property
and Escrow Instructions, dated October 3, 2012 (“Original Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Parties entered
into the Assignment of Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property and Escrow Instructions dated November 1, 2012; and 
 WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the First Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property and Escrow Instructions (“First Amendment”) dated November 19, 2012; and

 WHEREAS, this Second Amendment is permitted pursuant to Section 17 of the Original Agreement, provided it is
agreed and executed by all Parties. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained
hereinafter, the Parties hereto, agree as follows: 
 1. The Closing as set forth in Section 2 of the First Amendment
shall be extended from the original date of December 21, 2012, until and including December 31, 2012. 
 2. The
new Closing Date as set forth in Section 7.2 of the Original Agreement shall now be Monday, December 31, 2012. 

3. All the remaining terms and conditions of the Original Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment on the day and year set forth below. 








							
	 SELLER:
	 		 	GREIT-SUTTER SQUARE, LP,
		 		 	a California limited partnership
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Todd A. Mikles

		 		 	Name:	 	Todd A. Mikles
		 		 	Title:	 	Manager

 EXECUTED on this the 21 day of December 2012. 
  

							
	 SELLER GUARANTOR:
	 		 	 G REIT LIQUIDATING TRUST,
 a Maryland trust

				
		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Gary Wescombe
		 		 	Name:	 	Gary Wescombe
		 		 	Its:	 	Trustee

 EXECUTED on this the 21 day of December 2012. 
  

							
	 BUYER:
	 		 	 Chequers-Sutter Square, LLC,
 a California limited liability company

				
		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Todd A. Mikles
		 		 		 	Name: Todd A. Mikles
		 		 		 	Title: Manager

 EXECUTED on this the 21 day of December 2012. 
 [Signature Page to Second
Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property and Escrow Instructions]
Exhibit
      32.1








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**(Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus Properties Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William H.
      Armstrong III, as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 9, 2006










/s/
      William H. Armstrong III


William
      H. Armstrong III


Chairman
      of the Board, President and


Chief
      Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 14 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       January 8, 2003.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill (S. 
23) to provide for a 5-month extension of the Temporary Extended Unemployment 
Compensation Act of 2002 and for a transition period for individuals receiving 
compensation when the program under such Act ends. The bill shall be considered 
as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by Representative Thomas of 
California and Representative Rangel of New York; and (2) one motion to 
recommit.
    Sec. 2. The allocations referred to in section 3(a)(4)(B)(i) of House 
Resolution 5 may be submitted by Representative Nussle of Iowa.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
November 12, 2019





United States Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street N.E.


Washington, D.C.   20549





Re:   Notice of Disclosure filed in Securities Exchange Act Quarterly Report under Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 and Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 and Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, notice is hereby provided that Santander Holdings USA, Inc. has made disclosure pursuant to those provisions in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019 , which was submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2019 .





Very truly yours,


/s/ Gerard A. Chamberlain


Name: Gerard A. Chamberlain





Title: Senior Deputy General Counsel and Executive Vice President
ex10-36.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.36


 







[On Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company Letterhead]






















October 26, 2012












Via Facsimile (213-271-1614)







Cadiz, Inc.


Attn: President


550 South Hope Street, Ste 2850


Los Angeles, CA 90071







Re:           Notice of Termination of “Option Agreement between Cadiz, Inc. and Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company, dated August 12, 2011, and as Amended June 29, 2012”







To Whom It May Concern:







Cadiz, Inc. (“Cadiz”) and Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company (“Questar Southern Trials”) are both Parties to the “Option Agreement between Cadiz, Inc. and Questar Southern Trials Pipeline Company, dated August 12, 2011, effective August 1, 2011, as amended June 29, 2012” (“Amended Option Agreement”).







Pursuant to Section 2.5 of the Amended Option Agreement either Cadiz or Questar Southern Trails has the right to terminate the Amended Option Agreement at any time during the Phase 3 Option Period, upon giving at least 30 days advance written notice to the non-terminating Party. Section 2.5 of the Amended Option Agreement defines the Phase 3 Option Period as commencing July 1, 2012, and continuing through the earlier of April 30, 2013, or the closing of a definitive Purchase and Sales Agreement.







Accordingly, Questar Southern Trails hereby provides Cadiz notice that Questar Southern Trails is terminating the Amended Option Agreement in its entirety, effective November 26, 2012.







Sincerely,












/s/ Lawrence A. Conti


Lawrence A. Conti
# U n i ted S ta te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 21-7056 September Term, 2021 1: 20-cv -022 06-TNM Filed O n: Sep tem ber 1 0, 2 021 Debo rah L aufer, In divi dua lly ,

App ellant
v . Alam ac In c., AW ashin gton, DC Corp oratio n, doin g busine ss as River Inn W ashin gton DC,

App ellee ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Hend erson , Ka tsas, and W alker, Circuit Ju dges J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief an d a ppe ndix f iled b y

the ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P . 34 (a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 3 4(j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court's May 17, 20 21 orde r be af f irmed . T he district cou rt correctly conclud ed tha t ap pellan t lacks st and ing. Se e Spo keo, Inc. v. Robins, 1 36 S. Ct. 15 40, 15 48 (201 6). Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk
Chart 3-10. Rising proportions of women ages 40 to 54 have 

worked for their current employer for 10 years or longer

22 23

33

43

53 55

10

21

29

36

44

48 51 51

15

51

0

20

40

60

80

30 to 34

years

35 to 39 40 to 44 45 to 49 50 to 54 55 to 59 60 to 64 65 years

and over

1983 2004

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Percent with 10 or more 

years of tenure

Age

Chart 3-10. Rising proportions of women ages 40 to 54 have 

worked for their current employer for 10 years or longer

• Between 1983 and 2004, the proportion of women who have worked for their 

current employer for 10 years or longer increased among those 40 to 54 years 

old. 

• Some of this increase may reflect differences in the labor market experiences 

of women in different generations.
[No. 53589-7-I.

Division One.

October 24, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *on behalf of Nathan Edward Ross, Petitioner,*v. John Edward Ross et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-3-08711-1, James A. Doerty, J., and Stephen Gaddis, J. Pro Tern., entered October 3, and November 4, and 24, 2003. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Cox, C.J., and Grosse, J.
# Employment Characteristics of Families

"The Employment Characteristics of Families release presents employment and unemployment data by various family characteristics.  Estimates in this release are based on data from the Current Population Survey.  Included in this release are employment and unemployment data for parents and for married-couple families, families maintained by women, families maintained by men, and families with children.  Issued annually.  For more information, visit www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm#families."

- In 2023, 4.8% of families include an unemployed person, up from 4.7% in the prior year
- In 2022, 4.7% of families include an unemployed person, down from 6.7% in the prior year
- In 2021, 6.7% of families include an unemployed person, down from 9.8% in the prior year
- In 2020, 9.8% of families include an unemployed person, double the share in the prior year
- In 2019, 4.9% of families include an unemployed person, down from 5.2% in 2018
- In 2018, 5.2% of families include an unemployed person, down from 5.8% in 2017
- In 2017, 5.8% of families included an unemployed person, down from 6.5% in 2016
- In 2016, 6.5% of families included an unemployed person, down from 6.9% in 2015
- In 2015, 6.9% of families included an unemployed person, down from 2014
- In 2014, 8.0% of families include an unemployed person, down from 2013
- Percent of families with an unemployed person at 9.6% in 2013, down from 10.5% in 2012
- Percent of families with an unemployed person at 10.5% in 2012, down from 11.5% in 2011
#### Isidor Greitzer, Respondent, *v.*Samuel Ershowsky, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

June, 1905.)

Evidence — Documentary evidence — Opinion on former trial not evidence.

An opinion of the Appellate Term, written upon the reversal of a former judgment in the same case, is not evidence; and its introduction as such, upon a new trial of the case, where it contains a statement to the effect that the conclusion of the justice upon the former trial was amply supported by the evidence, is error, for which the judgment should be reversed.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment rendered in ffavor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, ninth. district, borough of Manhattan.

House, Grossman & Vorhaus (Charles Goldzier, of counsel), for appellant.

Eugene I. Yuells, for respondent.

Scott, J.

This action was brought to recover for a balance claimed by the plaintiff to be due as a third installment *654for work, etc., under a building contract made between the parties and for extra1 work and material claimed to have been done and furnished by the plaintiff. The installment claimed was due upon the completion of the work and whether or not the plaintiff had fully performed the contract on his part, and whether he had done *extra*work were questions contested upon the trial. It appears that one Siegel was .a subcontractor of the plaintiff, that Siegel had filed a mechanic’s lien upon the defendant’s premises for a sum claimed to be due him, and that he had brought an action to foreclose such lien, in which action he had recovered a judgment in the Municipal Court which, upon appeal to this court, had been reversed. An opinion had been wri1> ten upon such reversal and the plaintiff .herein offered such opinion in evidence and over the objection of defendant’s counsel the same was received. The opinion contained, among other things, these words: . “ The performance of plaintiff’s work was not seriously disputed, and the conclusion of the trial justice that there was an amount due from the defendant to the principal contractor (the plaintiff in this action) sufficient to cover the plaintiff’s claim is amply supported by the evidence.” The introduction of this opinion was error. It in no sense constituted evidence, and was evidently offered to show that there was a certain sum due this plaintiff from the defendant, and also as showing that the performance of the contract upon which this plaintiff based his claim had been established in the former action.. Opinions form no part of the record and the statements- appearing therein cannot be considered unless the-judgment, appealed from so refers to the opinion as to make it a part of the record. Koehler v. Hughes, 148 N. Y. 507. This-opinion undoubtedly had great weight with the learned trial justice, and it cannot be said that the proof on the part of the plaintiff was so clear as to be beyond dispute. There-should be a new trial.

Dugro and MacLean, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, Avith costs to-appellant to abide event.
No. 1164.

#### Scott *v.*Ragen, Warden.

May 13, 1946.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois, denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Gulf Coast Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Rahim Rayani, President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  April 15, 2008

                                        /S/ RAHIM RAYANI
                                        --------------------
                                        Rahim Rayani
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Chief Financial Officer
[No. 54933-2-I.

Division One.

December 5, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Hung Van Nguyen, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-02657-0, Michael Hayden, J., entered September 7, 2004. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# SNR06
H. R. 733

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire the McLoughlin House in

Oregon City, Oregon, for inclusion in Fort Vancouver National Historic Site,

and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; DEFINITIONS.

(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘McLoughlin

House Addition to Fort Vancouver National Historic Site Act’’.

(b) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this Act, the following

definitions apply:

(1) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means Oregon City, Oregon.

(2) MCLOUGHLIN HOUSE.—The term ‘‘McLoughlin House’’

means the McLoughlin House National Historic Site which

is described in the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior’s

Order of June 27, 1941, and generally depicted on the map

entitled ‘‘McLoughlin House, Fort Vancouver National Historic

Site’’, numbered 389/92,002, and dated 5/01/03, and includes

the McLoughlin House, the Barclay House, and other associated

real property, improvements, and personal property.

(3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary

of the Interior.

SEC. 2. MCLOUGHLIN HOUSE ADDITION TO FORT VANCOUVER.

(a) ACQUISITION.—The Secretary is authorized to acquire the

McLoughlin House, from willing sellers only, by donation, purchase

with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange, except that lands

or interests in lands owned by the City may be acquired by donation

only.

(b) MAP AVAILABILITY.—The map identifying the McLoughlin

House referred to in section 1(b)(2) shall be on file and available

for inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service,

Department of the Interior.

(c) BOUNDARIES; ADMINISTRATION.—Upon acquisition of the

McLoughlin House, the acquired property shall be included within

the boundaries of, and be administered as part of, the Fort Vancouver National Historic Site in accordance with all applicable

laws and regulations.

(d) NAME CHANGE.—Upon acquisition of the McLoughlin House,

the Secretary shall change the name of the site from the

‘‘McLoughlin House National Historic Site’’ to the ‘‘McLoughlin

House’’.

(e) FEDERAL LAWS.—After the McLoughlin House is acquired

and added to Fort Vancouver National Historic Site, any reference
H. R. 733—2

in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of

the United States to the ‘‘McLoughlin House National Historic

Site’’ (other than this Act) shall be deemed a reference to the

‘‘McLoughlin House’’, a unit of Fort Vancouver National Historic

Site.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated February 13, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements of Envirosource,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries  included in this
Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the years ended  December 31, 2000 and 1999.  We
hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  of  said  report  in the
Registration  Statements  of  Envirosource,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries  on Form S-8
Registration Statement Numbers 33-34566,  33-26633, 33-1549, 33-13728, 33-46925,
33-53019 and 333-42954.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 21, 2001
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 802

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to require 

medically accurate factual information in any course material or instruction on human development and sexuality. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. GUTIERREZ (for himself, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. EVANS, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. 

PAYNE, and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to require medically accurate factual information 

in any course material or instruction on human development and sexuality.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medically Accurate Sex 

5 Education Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MEDICALLY ACCURATE SEX EDUCATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Elementary and Secondary 

8 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) is amend-
2

•HR 802 IH 

1 ed by inserting after section 9528 (20 U.S.C. 7908) the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 9528A. MEDICALLY ACCURATE SEX EDUCATION. 

4 ‘‘(a) REQUIREMENT.—An elementary school or sec5 ondary school receiving funds under this Act shall not pro6 vide factual information that is not medically accurate in 

7 course material or instruction on human development and 

8 sexuality, including any sex education, family life edu9 cation, abstinence education, comprehensive health edu10 cation, or character education. 

11 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

12 ‘‘(1) The term ‘factual information’ includes in13 formation related to medical, psychiatric, psycho14 logical, empirical, or statistical statements. 

15 ‘‘(2) The term ‘medically accurate’ means sup16 ported by research, recognized as accurate and ob17 jective by leading medical, psychological, psychiatric, 

18 and public health organizations and agencies, and, 

19 where relevant, published in peer-reviewed jour20 nals.’’. 

21 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con22 tents at section 2 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu23 cation Act of 1965 is amended by inserting after the item 

24 relating to section 9528 the following:

‘‘Sec. 9528A. Medically accurate sex education’’.

Æ