alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

Exhibit 31 - CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis Mast, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Hydroflo, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures for the issuer and have:

        (i) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
        material information relating to the issuer is made known to me,
        particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being
        prepared;

        (ii) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and
        procedures as of June 30, 2003 ["Evaluation Date"]; and

        (iii) Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
        the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
        Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons
fulfilling the equivalent function):

        (i) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
        controls which could adversely affect the issuer's ability to record,
        process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
        issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls (none were
        so noted); and

        (ii) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
        other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal
        controls (none were so noted); and

6. I have indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date: 9/19/03

/s/ Dennis Mast
    Dennis Mast
    Chief Executive Officer
    Chief Financial Officer
```
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the                Report. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Henry Fong                                                                 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Henry                Fong                                                                     |
|   | Principal                Executive Officer andPrincipal                Financial Officer |
|   | May                15, 2007                                                                   |

----

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: March 31, 2006 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orthofix International N.V. (Orthofix) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2011 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Alan W. Milinazzo, Chief Executive Officer and President of Orthofix, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Orthofix.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                      |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 10, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/Alan W. Milinazzo
|                    |  |  |  | Name:                |  | Alan W. Milinazzo                    
|                    |  |  |  | Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


                                                      Jurisdiction of
Name                                                  Incorporation
----                                                  -------------
HTM Holdings, Inc.                                    Delaware

SMTC de Chihuahua S.A. de C.V.                        Mexico

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of California          California

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Canada              Ontario, Canada

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Colorado            Delaware

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Ireland Limited     Ireland

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Massachusetts       Massachusetts

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of North Carolina      North Carolina

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Texas               Texas

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Wisconsin           Wisconsin

SMTC MEX Holdings, Inc.                               Delaware

SMTC Nova Scotia Company                              Nova Scotia, Canada

Qualtron Teoranta                                     Ireland

Qualtron, Inc.                                        Massachusetts
ex10-11.htm


 


Exhibit 10.11


 


AMENDMENT TO THE



EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”), dated February 12, 2013, is by and between MeetMe, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Michael Matte (the “Employee”).







WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of October 22, 2007, as amended (the “Agreement”) which set forth the terms of the Employee’s employment as Chief Financial Officer of the Company; and







WHEREAS, in the event that the Employee is terminated prior to the filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company desires to ensure the Employee’s assistance in preparing the December 31, 2012 financial statements  and Form 10-K.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the obligations and covenants herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Employee hereby agree as follows:








	
  

	
1.

	
The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:












The last sentence of Section 7b(ii) shall be deleted and replaced with the following:







In addition, Employee will have the right to exercise all such options for a period of four (4) years following such termination.







2.           The Company hereby represents that it has the authority to enter into this Amendment and has received all required approvals including approval of the Company’s Compensation Committee and/or the Executive Committee.







3.           In the event of any conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms as contained in this Amendment shall control. In all other respects the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed.







4.           All Stock Option Agreements representing options granted to the Employee are hereby modified to provide the Employee with the right to exercise such options until 6:00 pm New York time on the four (4) year anniversary of the date of termination. 







5.           This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be one and the same agreement. Facsimile signatures shall be treated in all respects and for all purposes as originals.









  





  











  




 




6.           In all other respects, the Agreement and all Stock Option Agreements with the Employee are ratified and conformed between the Company and the Employee shall be amended in the same manner as the Agreement.












[Signature Page to Follow]






  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


 



	 	 
COMPANY:







MeetMe, Inc.







By:  /s/ John Abbott


     John Abbott, Chairman and CEO






















EMPLOYEE:












/s/ Michael Matte


Michael Matte
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       9,307,000
<SECURITIES>                                39,771,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,267,000
<PP&E>                                      11,273,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,515,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,664,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,566,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,909,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,664,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,487,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,298,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,379,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,379,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,379,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.69)


</TABLE>
|NORTHEAST BANCORP                                                
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit 11. Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|EQUIVALENT SHARES:                                               
|                                                                 
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                              
|                                                                 
|Total Diluted Shares                                             
|                                                                 
|Net Income                                                       
|                                                                 
|Basic Earnings Per Share                                         
|                                                                 
|Diluted Earnings Per Share                                       
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|EQUIVALENT SHARES:                                               
|                                                                 
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                              
|                                                                 
|Total Diluted Shares                                             
|                                                                 
|Net Income                                                       
|                                                                 
|Basic Earnings Per Share                                         
|                                                                 
|Diluted Earnings Per Share
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 859

To repeal the prohibition on the payment of interest on demand deposits, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. GONZALEZ, 

Mr. SHAYS, and Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To repeal the prohibition on the payment of interest on 

demand deposits, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Business Checking 

5 Freedom Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTEREST-BEARING TRANSACTION ACCOUNTS AU7 THORIZED. 

8 (a) REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON PAYMENT OF IN9 TEREST ON DEMAND DEPOSITS.—
2

•HR 859 IH 

1 (1) FEDERAL RESERVE ACT.—Section 19(i) of 

2 the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 371a) is amend3 ed to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(i) [Repealed]’’. 

5 (2) HOME OWNERS’ LOAN ACT.—The first sen6 tence of section 5(b)(1)(B) of the Home Owners’ 

7 Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1464(b)(1)(B)) is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘savings association may not—’’ and all 

9 that follows through ‘‘(ii) permit any’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘savings association may not permit any’’. 

11 (3) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT.—Sec12 tion 18(g) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 

13 U.S.C. 1828(g)) is amended to read as follows: 

14 ‘‘(g) [Repealed]’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect at the end of the 1-year 

17 period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

18 SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

19 In the case of an escrow account maintained at a de20 pository institution in connection with a real estate trans21 action—

22 (1) the absorption, by the depository institution, 

23 of expenses incidental to providing a normal banking 

24 service with respect to such escrow account; 
3

•HR 859 IH 

1 (2) the forbearance, by the depository institu2 tion, from charging a fee for providing any such 

3 banking function; and 

4 (3) any benefit which may accrue to the holder 

5 or the beneficiary of such escrow account as a result 

6 of an action of the depository institution described 

7 in subparagraph (1) or (2) or similar in nature to 

8 such action, 

9 shall not be treated as the payment or receipt of interest 

10 for purposes of this Act and any provision of Public Law 

11 93–100, the Federal Reserve Act, the Home Owners’ Loan 

12 Act, or the Federal Deposit Insurance Act relating to the 

13 payment of interest on accounts or deposits at depository 

14 institutions.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

June 25, 2012

s0618

Order 

June 25, 2012

144825

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144825

COA: 307610

Emmet CC: 11-003472-FH

RYAN SCOTT SYDOW,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 30, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |

|                                                               |   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Richard E. Bagley                                         |   |   |   |   |
| Richard      E. Bagley, President and Chief      Financial Officer |   |   |   |
| (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer)                   |   |   |   |   |
| April 30,      2010                                                |   |   |   |   |

 

----
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

Wniteb ~tate5 (!Court of ~peaI5

for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

AUGUSTINE PEREZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

2011-5129

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal

Claims in case no. 10-CV-821, Judge Francis M. Allegra.

ON MOTION

Before BRYSON, MAYER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Augustine Perez moves for reconsideration of the

court's order summarily affirming the judgment of the

United States Court of Federal Claims and requests

reconsideration en bane.

Upon consideration thereof,
PEREZ v. US

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

2

(1) The motion for reconsideration by the panel is denied.

(2) The request for en banc reconsideration shall be

circulated to the court.

FOR THE COURT

NOV 09 2012

Date

cc: Augustine Perez

Lauren S. Moore, Esq.

s8

lsi Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

UJlCOURf~~~P~FOR THE FEDE!tt',t r.mCIJIT

NOV 09 2U12

JAN HORBALY

CLERK
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Eric Phillip ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-2872.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 4, 2013.

Filed: April 8, 2013.

*602Allen A. Slaughter, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

Kevin M. O’Brien, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Eric Phillip Romero, Chicago, IL, pro se.

Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Eric Romero appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to a drug charge. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court abused its discretion by imposing a prison term that is greater than necessary and unreasonable.

Upon careful review, this court concludes that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Romero. *See United States v. Montgomery,*525 F.3d 627, 629 (8th Cir.2008) (reviewing sentence under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard). This court independently reviewed the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and found no nonfrivolous issues.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7623

WINSTON MCCOY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN B. METZGER, III; JOSEPH F. LEWIS; SANDRA

COMBS; WINNIE E. RICHARDSON-DIXON; LINDA R.

PITMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-246)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winston McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. McCoy v. Metzger, No. CA-95-246 (W.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED