alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                           Section 1350 Certification


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of DirectView, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the nine months ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
Robbins, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/Jeffrey Robbins
Jeffrey Robbins
President
November 21, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matritech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen D.
Chubb, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Matritech,
Inc. and will be retained by Matritech, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request. /s/ Stephen D. Chubb Stephen D. Chubb
Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2005
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements (No. 333-125060) on Form S-1 and (Nos. 333-134542, 333-124969, 333-123816, 333-108009, 333-91072, 333-91070, 333-72194, 333-55520, 333-39928) on Form S-8 of Occam Networks, Inc. and subsidiary of our report datedMarch 10, 2006 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Occam Networks, Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

September 15, 2006
EX-23
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors
World Am, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our independent
registered public accounting firm's report dated March 21, 2005
(except for Note 14, as to which the date is April 6, 2005) on the
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 (restated),
included in World Am, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB, into the Company's
previously filed registration statements on Form S-8 POS (File No.
333-109358).


/s/ L.L. Bradford & Company, LLC
Las Vegas, Nevada
April 20, 2004
[No. 55608-8-I.

Division One.

December 19, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Richard W. Adams, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Whatcom County, No. 04-1-00565-8, Ira Uhrig, J., entered December 17, 2004. *Remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the filing by ADE Corporation (the Company) of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31,
2005 (the Report), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Brian C. James     
|                     |  | Brian C. James         
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
# 21QRTL6_00
#### Robert L. LYTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald BERG, in his individual capacity only; Timothy Philips, in his individual capacity only, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-3321.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 6, 2013.

Filed: April 1, 2013.

Robert L. Lytle, Rapid City, SD, pro se.

Robert Gusinsky, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Rapid City, SD, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Lytle appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint against two Food and Drug Administration (FDA) employees in their individual capacities, claiming they had wrongfully sent him an FDA warning letter. His complaint sought damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and additionally asserted, inter alia, a claim of tortious interference. He did not, however, indicate that he had exhausted or pursued any administrative remedies.

Upon careful review, *see Retro Television Network, Inc. v. Luken Commc’ns,*LLC., 696 F.3d 766, 768 (8th Cir.2012) (de novo review of Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal), we conclude that the dismissal was proper. In particular, we agree with the district court that Lytle had no cognizable claim under section 1983, *see Jones v. United States,*16 F.3d 979, 981 (8th Cir.1994) (§ 1983 is inapplicable when person acts under color of federal law), and that any claim under *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), would fail as a matter of law. See *Nebraska Beef, Ltd. v. Greening,*398 F.3d 1080, 1084 (8th Cir.2005) (when Congress creates comprehensive regulatory regime, existence of right to judicial review under Administrative Procedures Act is sufficient to preclude *Bivens*action). Likewise, we agree that his tort claim failed for non-exhaustion of available administrative remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) (action shall not be instituted upon claim for money damages for any act or omission taken by government employee acting within scope of employment, unless claimant has first presented *563claim to appropriate federal agency and claim was denied); *McNeil v. United States,*508 U.S. 106, 113, 113 S.Ct. 1980, 124 L.Ed.2d 21 (1993) (Federal Tort Claims Act bars claimants from bringing suit in federal court until they have exhausted administrative remedies).2

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota.

2

. We also conclude that the court properly denied Lytle’s motion to strike the entry of appearance by an Assistant United States Attorney. See 28 C.F.R. § 50.15 (federal employee sued in individual capacity for action within scope of employment may be provided representation by United States Department of Justice attorney),
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,081,588
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,287,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (162,964)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,240,932
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,593,260
<PP&E>                                       2,025,593
<DEPRECIATION>                               (747,976)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,587,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,514,630
<BONDS>                                        788,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           340
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,583,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,587,213
<SALES>                                     17,590,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,590,468
<CGS>                                       13,730,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,158,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (388,157)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (221,909)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (166,248)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (388,157)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**THE AAL MUTUAL FUNDS**
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

Sex and reason

2006

Thousands of

persons Methods used as a percent of total jobseekers

Average

number

of

methods

used

Total

unemployed

Total

jobseekers

Employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

 Total, 16 years and over ......................................................... 7,001 6,080 61.3 53.9 14.4 17.1 17.3 6.7 11.0 1.82

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 3,321 2,400 63.6 52.2 16.3 19.7 21.7 8.5 12.4 1.95

Job leavers ............................................................................... 827 827 62.1 55.7 16.6 16.5 17.3 6.8 11.4 1.87

Reentrants ................................................................................ 2,237 2,237 59.3 54.3 12.8 15.0 14.9 5.7 10.4 1.73

New entrants ............................................................................ 616 616 58.7 56.5 9.5 15.2 9.2 3.3 6.9 1.60

 Men, 16 years and over .......................................................... 3,753 3,181 63.0 51.4 14.4 18.5 17.0 7.0 11.1 1.83

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 2,021 1,448 65.3 50.0 16.0 20.9 20.7 8.7 12.4 1.95

Job leavers ............................................................................... 406 406 66.2 52.7 17.1 18.2 16.0 7.0 11.9 1.89

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,015 1,015 59.1 51.6 12.7 16.4 14.7 5.7 10.6 1.71

New entrants ............................................................................ 312 312 60.9 56.2 9.1 15.0 8.8 3.4 6.0 1.60

 Women, 16 years and over .................................................... 3,247 2,899 59.4 56.5 14.3 15.5 17.7 6.4 10.8 1.81

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs 1 ........ 1,300 952 60.9 55.5 16.7 17.9 23.3 8.2 12.3 1.95

Job leavers ............................................................................... 421 421 58.2 58.7 16.1 14.9 18.5 6.6 11.0 1.84

Reentrants ................................................................................ 1,223 1,223 59.4 56.5 12.9 13.8 15.1 5.6 10.2 1.74

New entrants ............................................................................ 304 304 56.5 56.8 9.8 15.5 9.7 3.2 7.7 1.60

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude

persons on temporary layoff.

 NOTE: The jobseekers total is less than the total unemployed because it does

not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will

always total more than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method.

Beginning in January 2006, data reflect revised population controls used in the

household survey.

257
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the filing by Rush Financial Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company")  of the  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending
September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Randy Rutledge, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) and
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and results of operation of
         the Company.



Dated:  November 15, 2004


                                                 /s/ Randy Rutledge
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Randy Rutledge
                                                 Chief Financial Officer





                                       34
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 820

To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent certain types of mail 

matter from being sent by a Member of the House of Representatives 

as part of a mass mailing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 

Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent certain 

types of mail matter from being sent by a Member of 

the House of Representatives as part of a mass mailing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESTRICTION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3210(a) of title 39, 

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 
2

•HR 820 IH 

1 ‘‘(8) A Member of the House of Representatives may 

2 not send, as part of a mass mailing, any matter described 

3 in subparagraph (B), (C), or (F) of paragraph (3).’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to mail sent during 

6 any session of Congress beginning after the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act.

Æ
KENNY INFORMATION SYSTEMS
  (A Division of J.J. Kenny Co., Inc.)
  January 27, 1999
  PaineWebber Incorporated
  Unit Trust Department
  1200 Harbor Blvd.
  Weehawken, New Jersey 07087
  RE: THE MUNICIPAL BOND TRUST, SERIES 222
  Gentlemen:
  We have examined the post-effective Amendment to the Registration
  Statement File No. 33-28199 for the above-captioned trust. We
  hereby acknowledge that Kenny Information Systems, a division of
  J.J. Kenny Co., Inc. is currently acting as the evaluator for the trust.
  We hereby consent to the use in the Amendment of the reference to
  Kenny Information Systems, a division of J.J. Kenny Co. Inc., as
  evaluator.
  In addition, we hereby confirm that the ratings indicated in the
  above-referenced Amendment to the Registration Statement for the
  respective bonds comprising the trust portfolio are the ratings
  currently indicated in our KENNYBASE database.
  You are hereby authorized to file a copy of this letter with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission.
                              Sincerely,
                              /s/ JOHN R. FITZGERALD
                              John R. Fitzgerald
                              Senior Vice President
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JERMAINE E. JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-626

[July 14, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kirk Volker, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 50-2008-CF-003745-AXXX-MB.

Jermaine E. Jackson, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17423]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-809]

Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: 
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Shuler at (202) 482-1293 or 
Shane Subler at (202) 482-0189; AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 24, 2008, the Department published a notice of 
initiation of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from the Republic of Korea, 
covering the period November 1, 2007 through October 31, 2008. See 
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 73 FR 79055 (December 24, 
2008). The current deadline for the preliminary results of this 
administrative review is August 2, 2009.

Statutory Time Limits

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''), requires the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') to 
issue the preliminary results of an administrative review within 245 
days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which 
a review is requested and the final results of review within 120 days 
after the date on which the preliminary results are published. If it is 
not practicable to complete the review within the time period, section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend these deadlines 
to a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, respectively.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results

    The Department requires additional time to review and analyze the 
sales and cost responses in this administrative review. In particular, 
one of the respondents in this case has never participated in an 
antidumping case with the Department, and we need additional time to 
review its sales and cost methodologies. Thus, it is not practicable to 
complete this review within the originally anticipated time limit 
(i.e., by August 2, 2009). Therefore, the Department is extending the 
time limit for completion of the preliminary results by 120 days to not 
later than November 30, 2009, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) 
of the Act.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

    Dated: July 14, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-17423 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 634

To provide Medicare beneficiaries with access to prescription drugs at Federal 

Supply Schedule prices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To provide Medicare beneficiaries with access to prescription 

drugs at Federal Supply Schedule prices.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACCESS OF MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES TO PRE4 SCRIPTION DRUGS AT FEDERAL SUPPLY 

5 SCHEDULE PRICES. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 

7 individual who is entitled to benefits under part A, 

8 or enrolled under part B, of title XVIII of the Social 

9 Security Act shall be eligible to obtain prescription 
2

•HR 634 IH 

1 drugs at the prices specified in the Federal Supply 

2 Schedule.

Æ