alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 795

To require the Secretary of Energy to develop a plan to decrease the threat 

resulting from the theft or diversion of highly enriched uranium. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. DEUTSCH (for himself and Mr. MARKEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Energy to develop a plan to 

decrease the threat resulting from the theft or diversion 

of highly enriched uranium.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PLAN. 

4 Section 307 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 

5 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5877) is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(d) Not later than 6 months after the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall trans9 mit to the Congress a plan to decrease the threat resulting 
2

•HR 795 IH 

1 from the theft or diversion of highly enriched uranium. 

2 Such plan shall provide, as appropriate, for—

3 ‘‘(1) monitoring of highly enriched uranium 

4 supplies at any commercial companies who have ac5 cess to substantial amounts of highly enriched ura6 nium; 

7 ‘‘(2) assistance to companies described in para8 graph (1) with security and personnel checks; 

9 ‘‘(3) acceleration of the process of blending 

10 down excess highly enriched uranium into low-en11 riched uranium; 

12 ‘‘(4) purchasing highly enriched uranium; 

13 ‘‘(5) paying the cost of shipping highly enriched 

14 uranium; 

15 ‘‘(6) accelerating the conversion of commercial 

16 research reactors and energy reactors to the use of 

17 low-enriched uranium where they now use highly en18 riched uranium; and 

19 ‘‘(7) minimizing, and encouraging transparency 

20 in, the further enrichment of low-enriched uranium 

21 to highly enriched uranium.’’.

Æ
NOTE: Data are for weekdays (Monday-Friday) only and refer to employed persons ages 25 to 54 who worked on the diary day and 

lived in households with children under 18. All categories, except sleeping and working, include related travel time. Data are 2004 

annual averages.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 6-9. On weekdays that they worked, employed persons 

with children spent two-thirds of an average day working and 

sleeping

Sleeping

7.4 hours

Working

8.0 hours

Household 

activities

1.1 hours

Leisure

and sports

2.7 hours

Eating and drinking

1.1 hours

Other

2.5 hours

Caring for others

1.2 hours

Total = 24 hours

2004

Chart 6-9. On weekdays that they worked, employed persons 

with children spent two-thirds of an average day working and 

sleeping

• On an average work day (Monday-Friday) in 2004, employed persons ages 25 

to 54 with children in the household worked one-third (8.0 hours) of the day. 

No other single activity was allocated as much time.

• This same group slept 7.4 hours on weekdays that they worked—0.8 hour less 

than the average for the population ages 15 and older. The remainder of the 

day was spent doing a variety of activities, including leisure and sports (2.7 

hours); caring for others (1.2 hours); household activities such as housework, 

food preparation, and household management (1.1 hours); eating and drinking 

(1.1 hours); and other miscellaneous activities.

• Of the 1.2 hours spent per day caring for others, about an hour was spent 

providing care to children (household and non-household) under the age of 18 

as a primary activity. Primary childcare activities include bathing, dressing, 

reading to, and playing with children.
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

35. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

[In thousands]

Category

Total Age Sex

2022 2023

16 to 24

years

25 to 54

years

55 years

and over Men Women

2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023

Total not in the labor force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99,686 99,826 16,864 17,210 22,325 21,400 60,497 61,215 41,197 41,599 58,490 58,227

Do not want a job now1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94,047 94,496 15,292 15,574 19,865 19,172 58,891 59,749 38,506 39,072 55,541 55,424

Want a job1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,639 5,330 1,573 1,636 2,460 2,228 1,606 1,466 2,691 2,527 2,948 2,803

Did not search for work in previous

year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,500 3,277 929 943 1,405 1,280 1,166 1,054 1,636 1,514 1,864 1,763

Searched for work in previous year,

but not in past 4 weeks2

. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,139 2,053 644 693 1,055 948 440 412 1,055 1,013 1,084 1,040

Not available to work now. . . . . . . . . . . . 656 595 239 253 320 252 97 90 273 261 382 333

Marginally attached (available to

work now)3

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,484 1,458 405 440 735 696 343 322 782 752 702 706

Discouraged over job

prospects4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407 370 97 101 204 186 106 83 254 226 153 144

Reasons other than

discouragement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,077 1,088 308 339 531 510 237 239 528 526 549 562

Family responsibilities. . . . . . . . . . . 171 151 23 17 112 102 36 31 58 56 114 95

In school or training. . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 146 106 115 23 28 3 3 66 71 66 75

Ill health or disability. . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 124 17 16 67 52 56 56 67 55 73 69

Other5

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 633 667 161 191 329 327 143 149 337 344 296 323

1

Includes some persons who are not asked if they want a job.

2 Persons who had a job in the prior 12 months must have searched since the end of that job.

3 Persons ′′marginally attached to the labor force′′ are those who want a job, have searched for work during the prior 12 months, and were available to take a job during

the reference week, but had not looked for work in the past 4 weeks.

4 Discouraged workers are persons marginally attached to the labor force who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks for reasons such as thinks no work

available, could not find work, lacks schooling or training, employer thinks too young or old, and other types of discrimination.

5

Includes those who did not actively look for work in the prior 4 weeks for such reasons as child-care and transportation problems, as well as a small number for which

reason for nonparticipation was not ascertained.

NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

 

  I, **Nicholas Kaiser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form N-CSRS/A for the period ended May 31, 2008 (the “Report”).

 I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

  Date: August 4, 2008  /s/ *Nicholas Kaiser*  President 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

  I, **Christopher Fankhauser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form N-CSRS/A for the period ended May 31, 2008 (the “Report”).

I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

Date: August 4, 2008

/s/ *Christopher Fankhauser*Treasurer
<PAGE>

                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                               Document is copied.
                                   Exhibit 11


                            FOCUS ENHANCEMENTS, INC.
                  STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Nine months ended  Nine months ended
                                                               September 30,     September 30,
                                                                    2000              1999



<S>                                                             <C>               <C>
Net income                                                      $(5,208,394)      $   299,041

Basic:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding             25,003,382        18,210,783

Diluted:


Weighted average number of common shares outstanding             25,003,382        18,210,783
Weighted average common equivalent shares                                --           462,980

Weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding used to calculate per share data              25,003,382        18,673,764

Net income per share
        Basic                                                   $     (0.21)      $      0.02
                                                                ===========       ===========
        Diluted                                                 $     (0.21)      $      0.02
                                                                ===========       ===========
</TABLE>



                            FOCUS ENHANCEMENTS, INC.
                  STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            Three months ended  Three months ended
                                                               September 30,       September 30,
                                                                    2000               1999

<S>                                                              <C>               <C>
Net income                                                       $(2,516,846)      $   141,359

Basic:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding              25,863,036        19,061,111

Diluted:


Weighted average number of common shares outstanding              25,863,036        19,061,111
Weighted average common equivalent shares                                 --           328,573

Weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding used to calculate per share data               25,863,036        19,389,684

Net income per share
        Basic                                                    $     (0.10)      $      0.01
                                                                 ===========       ===========
        Diluted                                                  $     (0.10)      $      0.00
                                                                 ===========       ===========
</TABLE>

                                       1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 925 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 925

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1859 South Ashland Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Cesar 
                         Chavez Post Office''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 925

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1859 South Ashland Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Cesar 
                         Chavez Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1859 
South Ashland Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, and known as the Pilsen Post 
Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Cesar Chavez Post 
Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cesar Chavez Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Instructions

https://www.bls.gov/cps/methods/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# Index

# Illustration 1.1

# Illustration 1.2

# Illustration 1.3

# Illustration 1.4

# Illustration 2.1

# Illustration 2.2

# Illustration 3.1

# Illustration 3.2

# Illustration 4.1

# Illustration 4.2

# Illustration A

# Illustration B

# Illustration C
Area GTP employment1

GTP employment 

in area as a percent 

of U.S. GTP 

employment

GTP employment 

as a percent of total 

area employment

United States2

 ........................ 854,700 100.0 0.7

Census regions

Northeast3

 ........................... 168,500 19.7 .7

Midwest4 .............................. 198,200 23.2 .7

South5

 ................................. 267,600 31.3 .6

West6

 .................................... 220,300 25.8 .8

 2

 Detail may not sum to total due to rounding.

Table 4. Employment for workers spending more than half of their time involved in green 

technologies and practices (GTP employment), United States and census regions, August 2011

 1 Defined as employees who spend more than half of their time involved in green technologies and 

practices. 

 3 Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, 

Rhode Island, and Vermont.

 4 Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, 

South Dakota, and Wisconsin.

 6 Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, 

Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

 5 Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, 

Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and 

West Virginia.
# 18QRTL4_00

# image1.png
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 881 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 881

         To disapprove certain sentencing guideline amendments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2003

   Mr. Coble (for himself, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Smith of 
   Texas, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Jenkins, Mr. 
Cannon, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. Keller, 
   Ms. Hart, Mr. Flake, Mr. Pence, Mr. Forbes, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. 
Carter, Mr. Feeney, and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To disapprove certain sentencing guideline amendments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness in Sentencing Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. DISAPPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PROVIDING A MAXIMUM BASE 
              OFFENSE LEVEL UNDER SECTION 2D1.1(A)(3) IF THE DEFENDANT 
              RECEIVES A MITIGATING ROLE ADJUSTMENT UNDER SECTION 
              3B1.2.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, section 2D1.1(a)(3), 
and the Commentary to section 3B1.2, of the Sentencing Guidelines are 
amended to read as they read without regard to the effect of Amendment 
4 of the ``Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines, Policy Statements, 
and Official Commentary'' submitted by the United States Sentencing 
Commission to Congress on May 1, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
Ex10.18 NEO Comp 2012


Exhibit 10.18


SUMMARY OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
Effective as of January 1, 2012, the following are the annual base salaries of the Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive Officers of Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc.  No named executive officer has an employment contract with the Company.  The Named Executive Officers participate in various compensation plans and other arrangements as described in the Company's 2013 Proxy Statement.
 
	
				
	 
	2012 Base Salary

	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	$
	780,000
	


	Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President, Paper Business
	$
	463,500
	


	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	$
	335,000
	


	Executive Vice President, Reconstituted Tobacco Business
	€
	324,500
	


	Vice President, LIP
	$
	334,000
	


	Corporate Controller
	$
	208,000
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 872

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that church employees 

are eligible for the exclusion for qualified tuition reduction programs 

of charitable educational organizations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2003

Mr. CAMP (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. PITTS, Mr. 

SCHROCK, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. ISAKSON, and 

Mr. GOODE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

that church employees are eligible for the exclusion for 

qualified tuition reduction programs of charitable educational organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equity in Education 

5 Act of 2003’’.
2

•HR 872 IH 

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF CHURCH EM2 PLOYEES FOR EXCLUSION FOR QUALIFIED 

3 TUITION REDUCTION PROGRAMS OF CHARI4 TABLE EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 117(d) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified 

7 tuition reduction) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED TUITION REDUCTION.—For 

9 purposes of this subsection—

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘qualified 

11 tuition reduction’ means the amount of any re12 duction in tuition provided to an employee of—

13 ‘‘(i) an organization described in sec14 tion 170(b)(1)(A)(ii), or 

15 ‘‘(ii) an organization described in sec16 tion 170(b)(1)(A)(i) that owns and oper17 ates or controls an organization described 

18 in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii), 

19 for the education (below the graduate level) at 

20 the organization described in clause (i) (or an21 other organization described in section 

22 170(b)(1)(A)(ii)) of a person described in sub23 paragraph (B). 

24 ‘‘(B) PERSON DESCRIBED.—A person is 

25 described in this subparagraph if such person 

26 is—
3

•HR 872 IH 

1 ‘‘(i) the employee referred to in sub2 paragraph (A), or 

3 ‘‘(ii) any person treated as an em4 ployee (or whose use is treated as an em5 ployee use) under the rules of section 

6 132(h).’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 33474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16609]



[[Page 33474]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-09-019]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: July 10, 2009 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered

    1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-464 and 731-TA-1160 (Preliminary) (Prestressed 
Concrete Steel Wire Strand from China)--briefing and vote. (The 
Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations to the 
Secretary of Commerce on or before July 13, 2009; Commissioners' 
opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of 
Commerce on or before July 20, 2009.)
    5. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-465 and 731-TA-1161 (Preliminary) (Certain 
Steel Grating from China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is 
currently scheduled to transmit its determinations to the Secretary of 
Commerce on or before July 13, 2009; Commissioners' opinions are 
currently scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on 
or before July 20, 2009.)
    6. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: July 1, 2009.

    By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
 [FR Doc. E9-16609 Filed 7-9-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# 18SNR10_00

# image1.png
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 550

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain ink-jet textile printing machinery. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain ink-jet textile 

printing machinery.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN INK-JET TEXTILE PRINTING MACHIN4 ERY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.01.92 Ink-jet textile 

printing machinery (provided for 

in subheading 

8443.51.10) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2005 ’’. 
2

•HR 550 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[No. 55068-3-I.

Division One.

December 5, 2005.]

#### Planet Earth Foundation et al., *Respondents,*v. Gulf Underwriters Insurance Company et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-2-38316-3, Steven G. Scott, J., entered November 8, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Cox, C.J., and Schindler, J.
January 26, 1996


Transmitted Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549
Attn: Filing Desk, Stop 1 - 4

Re: Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund
     File No. 33-12938 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 9)
     File No. 811-5076 (Amendment No. 10)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund (the "Registrant") hereby
certifies, pursuant to Rule 497 (j) of the Securities Act of 1933,
that (i) the form of prospectus and Statement of Additional
Information that would have been filed under paragraph (c) of Rule
497 would not have differed from that contained in the above-
referenced, most recently filed amendment to the registration
statement of the Registrant (the "Amendment"), and (ii) the text of
the Amendment has been filed electronically.

                              Tax-Exempt California Money         
                              Market Fund


                              By: /s/ Philip J. Collora      
                                      Philip J. Collora
                                  Vice President and Secretary

GJN/jps