alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SEC. File Nos.	033-17917

**811-05364**

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

	Washington, D.C. 20549

____________________

 

 

	**FORMN-1A**

 

	Registration Statement

	Under

	the Securities Act of 1933

	Post-Effective Amendment No. 42

 

	and

 

	Registration Statement

	Under

	the Investment Company Act of 1940

	Amendment No. 45

____________________

 

	**AMERICANHIGH-INCOME TRUST**

	(ExactName of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

	333 South Hope Street

	Los Angeles, California 90071-1447

	(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

	Registrant's telephone number, includingarea code:

	(213) 486-9200

____________________

 

***	COURTNEY R. TAYLOR, Secretary***

***American High-Income Trust***

*	333 South Hope Street*

*	Los Angeles, California 90071-1447*

*	(Name and Address of Agent for Service)*

____________________

 

	Copies to:

*	Michael Glazer*

***Bingham McCutchen LLP***

355 South Grand Avenue, Suite4400

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3106

(Counsel for the Registrant)

____________________

	

	Approximate date of proposed public offering:

It is proposed that this filing become effectiveon August 29, 2014, pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Marshall D. Sorokwasz, certify that:
1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K for the year endedAugust 31, 2004 of Impreso, Inc. (the “Report”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by the Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in the Report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthe Report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by the Report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
6. Item 4 Controls and Procedures in the Company’s Form 10-K isincorporated herein by reference.   Date: December 14, 2004 /s/ Marshall D. Sorokwasz  **Marshall D. Sorokwasz** **Chief Executive Officer and President**
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 928 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 928

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Cerium Sulfide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2003

 Mr. Isakson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Cerium Sulfide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERIUM SULFIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.28.02    Cerium sulfide    Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     (CAS Nos. 12014-                                                        31/2007          ''
                     93-6 and 12031-                                                                           .
                     49-1) (provided
                     for in
                     subheading
                     2846.10.00)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 856

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to revise a repayment contract with the Tom Green County Water Control and Improvement District No. 1, San Angelo project, 

Texas, and for other purposes.
2

HR 856 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TOM GREEN COUNTY WATER CONTROL AND IM4 PROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1; REPAYMENT 

5 PERIOD EXTENDED. 

6 The Secretary of the Interior may revise the repay7 ment contract with the Tom Green County Water Control 

8 and Improvement District No. 1 numbered 14–06–500–

9 369, by extending the period authorized for repayment of 

10 reimbursable constructions costs of the San Angelo project 

11 from 40 years to 50 years.

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 

By MARTHA C. MORRISON, 

Deputy Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000885413
<NAME> WESTCO BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,902,188
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,504,666
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               700,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               740,750
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      76,213,079
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        76,629,446
<LOANS>                                    219,535,052
<ALLOWANCE>                                    882,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             307,772,487
<DEPOSITS>                                 252,968,882
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          7,103,935
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,828
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,664,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             307,772,487
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             13,814,472
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,545,132
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               100,156
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            17,459,750
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           9,250,956
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,208,804
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (2,819)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,535,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,241,505
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,241,505
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,134,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.63
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,619,200
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               882,800
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0<F1>
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              882,800
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        882,800
<FN>
<F1> Not contained in Form 10-Q
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 26

, 20 12

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 12

- 00260

- CR

____________

REYNALDO VALDEZ , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248 th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 131407



### MEMORANDUM OP IN ION

Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated sexual assault of a child . In

accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court

sentenced appellant on February 22, 2012 , to confinement for ten yea r s in the Institutional

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice . Appellant filed a pro se notice of

appeal.

The trial cour t entered a certification of the defendant ’ s right to appeal in which the

court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See

T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court ’ s certification is included in the record on2

appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court ’ s certification.

See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and McCally

.
Do Not Publish

— T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSE TORRES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 151 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSE TORRES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 152 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
 as Issuer
 and
 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
 as Trustee
 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
 Dated
as of May 7, 2010
 to the Indenture dated as of August 24, 2009
 5.000% Senior Notes due 2014
6.125% Senior Notes due 2019




---



##### 



Table of Contents
 PageARTICLE 1. APPLICATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
    
    
    2Section 1.01 Application of Second Supplemental Indenture
    
    
    2ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS
    
    
    2Section 2.01 Certain Terms Defined in the Indenture
    
    
    2ARTICLE 3. ADDITIONAL EVENT OF DEFAULT WITH RESPECT TO THE NOTES
    
    
    2Section 3.01 Event of Default
    
    
    2ARTICLE 4. MISCELLANEOUS
    
    
    2Section 4.01 Conflict with Trust Indenture Act
    
    
    3Section 4.02 New York Law to Govern
    
    
    3Section 4.03 Counterparts
    
    
    3Section 4.04 Separability Clause
    
    
    3Section 4.05 Ratification
    
    
    3Section 4.06 Effectiveness
    
    
    3
 i




---



##### 



SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
 Second Supplemental Indenture Company Trustee
 RECITALS OF THE COMPANY
 WHEREAS Base Indenture Indenture
 WHEREAS First Supplemental Indenture 2014 Notes 2019 Notes Notes
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 1




---



##### 



WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE:
  ARTICLE 1.
APPLICATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
 Application of Second Supplemental Indenture
 ARTICLE 2.
DEFINITIONS
 Certain Terms Defined in the Indenture
 ARTICLE 3.
ADDITIONAL EVENT OF DEFAULT WITH RESPECT TO THE NOTES
 Event of Default
 (9)
    
    Failure by the Company to comply with Section 3.04 of the First
Supplemental Indenture.




---



##### 



ARTICLE 4.
MISCELLANEOUS
 Conflict with Trust Indenture Act
 New York Law to Govern
  Counterparts
 Separability Clause
 Ratification
 Effectiveness




---



##### 



WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:

/s/ Paul M. BisaroName:
    Paul M. BisaroTitle:
    President, Chief Executive OfficerWELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 
ASSOCIATION, as TrusteeBy:

/s/ Maddy HallName:
    Maddy HallTitle:
    Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36497-36498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel, Tissue Engineering.
    Date: July 28, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.

[[Page 36498]]

    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jo Pelham, BA, Scientific Review Officer, Center 
for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 4102, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1786, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80f0e5ece8e1edeac0e3f3f2aeeee9e8aee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3646535a5e575b5c7655454418585f5e18515940">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 16, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17442 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TORMAX USA, LLC

, Appellant,

v.

KENNEDY CONTRACTORS, INC.

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 1867

[ July 24, 2024 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Debra Moses Stephens , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502022CC014719XXXXNB

.

Lauren Marcil of Gunster, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Stephen M. Cohen of Law Offices of Stephen M. Cohen, P.A., Palm

Beach Gardens , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellee Kennedy Contractors, Inc. (“Kennedy”) filed a breach of contract action against Appellant Tormax USA, LLC (“Tormax”) in the county court. A clerk’s default was subsequently entered against Tormax for failure to serve or file any document in the a ction. Tormax moved to set aside the default based on excusable neglect. The county court denied the motion, as well as Tormax’s motion for reconsideration.

Kennedy moved for summary judgment, which the county court granted. The court entered final summary judgment in favor of Kennedy for the $16,782. 20 Kennedy claimed in damages, plus attorney’s fees, costs, and prejudgment interest.

As there was no abuse of discretion, w e affirm the trial court’s decision not to set aside the default. However, we reverse and remand for a trial on damages because there are issues of fact regarding damages awardable

under the contract.

Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part

.2 G ROSS

, F ORST and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 99(c)

 

 

 

	Certificate as to Compliance
 

	I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of Household Finance Corporation (the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 4.10 of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2000 among Household Automotive Trust IV, as Issuer, Household Auto Receivables Corporation, as Seller, the Master Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association (Successor to Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association), as Indenture Trustee (the "Master Sale and Servicing Agreement"), that:

	1.  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1 through December 31, 2003 (the "Year") and of its performance under the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

	2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 25th day of March, 2004.

 

						/s/ Steven H. Smith		 
					Steven H. Smith

					Servicing Officer

 

 

AUTO 2000-1
<PAGE>   1
                       [DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP LETTERHEAD]




August 6, 1996

Simula, Inc.
2700 North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona

Dear Sirs:

At your request, we have read the description included in your Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended
June 30, 1996, of the facts relating to the Company's accounting change
described as follows:

        During the second quarter of 1996, the Company adopted a new method of
        accounting for pre contract costs. Pre contract costs represent amounts
        applicable to products and technologies which represent adaptations of
        existing capabilities to the requirements of the Company's customers.
        The Company will now expense these costs as they are incurred.

        This change is made due to current practice in Simula's segment of the
        industry.

We believe, on the basis of the facts so set forth and other information
furnished to us by appropriate officials of the Company, that the accounting
change described in your Form 10-Q is to an alternative accounting principle
that is preferable under the circumstances.

We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of Simula, Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to
December 31, 1995. Therefore, we are unable to express, and we do not express,
an opinion on the facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form 10-Q, on the
related information furnished to us by officials of the Company, or on the
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of Simula, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to
December 31, 1995.

Yours truly,



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
#### James E. Garner, Respondent, *v.*Myer Hellman, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

May, 1905.)

Practice — Motion to advance cause — Renewal without leave — Amendment to rules.

The practice of renewing, before one justice of the City Court of the city of New York, a motion to advance a cause to the special calendar for short causes, which had already been heard and denied by another justice, without first obtaining leave of court, will not be sanctioned and-an order granting the motion will be reversed.

The recent amendment to the rules of the said court, increasing the time to be allowed for a trial on the special calendar, while a potent argument on a motion for leave to renew, does not obviate the necessity for obtaining such leave.

Appeal from an order made and entered in the City Court of the city of New York, granted on plaintiff’s motion placing this cause on the special calendar.

Bernard H. Arnold, for appellant.

Wilford H. Smith, for respondent.

Scott, J.

We are ordinarily reluctant to interfere with the action of the court below in advancing a cause to the *337special calendar for short causes, and in the present ease it is not made to appear that the discretion of the justice making the order was abused. There is involved however in this appeal a question more important than any question of discretion, and that is the impropriety of renewing before one justice a motion which had already been heard and denied by another, without first obtaining leave of the court. This practice has been uniformly and very properly condemned by the courts. It does not help matters that the rules of the Oity Court have recently been amended by increasing the time to be allowed for a trial on the special calendar. The papers on appeal do not contain this rule, but wé are apprised of its existence by one of the briefs. It is true that it might be proper to advance a causé when two hours are given for its trial, and would be improper to so advance it if only one hour were allowed. ’ In this sense the question to be considered on the second motion may have differed slightly from that presented on the first, but the motion was identical. The change in the rule might have been a potent argument on a motion for leave to renew, but did not obviate the necessity for obtaining such leave.

Order reversed with costs and disbursements and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to an application below for leave to renew the motion to advance the cause, and to so renew it if leave be obtained.

Leventbitt and Gbeeitbaum, JJ., concur.

Order reversed with costs and disbursements and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice ,to an application below for leave to renew motion to advance causey and to so renew if leave be obtained.