alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB/A of DirectView, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the six months ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michele Ralston,
acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/Michele Ralston
Michele Ralston
Acting Chief Financial Officer
November 18, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 24, 2014

NO. 03-13-00215-CV

Christopher Jenkins, Appellant

v.

City of Cedar Park, Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN;

DISSENTING OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on March 25, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### In the Matter of Nayka R. and Others, Infants. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent. Mercedes R., Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 518]

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present-Scudder, PJ., Hurlbutt, Lunn, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11


                            FOCUS ENHANCEMENTS, INC.
                  STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                          Three months ended   Three months ended
                                                                               March 31,         March 31,
                                                                                2000              1999


<S>                                                                          <C>               <C>
Net income                                                                   $(1,579,370)      $   102,990

Basic:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                          24,335,368        18,005,090


Diluted:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                          24,335,368        18,005,090
Weighted average common equivalent shares                                             --           716,815

Weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding used to calculate per share data                           24,335,368        18,721,905

Net income per share
        Basic                                                                $     (0.06)      $      0.01
                                                                             ===========       ===========
        Diluted                                                              $     (0.06)      $      0.01
                                                                             ===========       ===========

</TABLE>
# 21QRTL4_00
II 

Calendar No. 165

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 8

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2003

Received and read the first time 

JUNE 20, 2003

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT

To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 8 PCS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Death Tax Repeal Per3 manency Act of 2003’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ESTATE TAX REPEAL MADE PERMANENT. 

5 Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 

6 Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to title V of 

7 such Act.

Passed the House of Representatives June 18, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 

By MARTHA C. MORRISON, 

Deputy Clerk. 

Calendar No. 165

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 8

AN ACT

To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent. 

JUNE 20, 2003

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
#### Louis Maggio, Appellant, *v.*The Ocean View Cemetery and St. Agnes Cemetery, Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

June, 1905.)

Appeal — Recitals of record — Mistake in clerk’s return.

Upon appeal to this court, the recitals of the record must prevail where there is palpable mistake in the return of the clerk of the court below.

Where a cause, tried in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, is submitted on January 20, and no legal stipulation extending the time of the trial justice to render judgment is-made, and the plaintiff’s attorney expressly requests the trial justice co render judgment within the statutory time fixed by section 230 of the Municipal Court Act, a judgment rendered on March 8, is void.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendants rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, fourth district, borough of Manhattan. '

G. L: Maggio, for appellant.

Herbert H. Walker, for respondent.

MacLean, J.

The plaintiff, as assignee, sought to recover wages upon a contract for work, labor and services per*681formed, and damages for a breach. From the judgment rendered in favor of the defendants the plaintiff appeals, and, among other objections, raises the question of jurisdiction of the court below to render this judgment. The return made by the clerk recites that the cause was tried on February 28, 1905, as also that the summons was issued on October 8, 1905. Where there is palpable mistake, the record must prevail, and the record herein discloses that the case was closed and decision reserved on January 30, 1905, and that thereafter there was no legal stipulation entered into between the parties to extend the time of the trial justice within which to render judgment. All that appears is that the attorney for the defendants alone stipulated first to extend the time to February twenty-eighth and later to March tenth, while by letter, attached to the record and dated February eleventh, the attorney for the plaintiff expressly requested the trial justice to render judgment within the statutory time. The judgment having been rendered on March 8, 1905, was not within the time fixed by section 230 of the Municipal Court Act, and so void. Lambert v. Salomon, 28 Misc. Rep. 562.

Judgment reversed, with costs to the appellant.

Scott and Dugro, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, with costs.
[No. 54386-5-I.

Division One.

November 28, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Alex Undrae Paul Moore, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 03-1-02023-5, David F. Hulbert, J., entered June 9, 2004. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kronos Advanced
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




/s/ Daniel R. Dwight
--------------------------------------
Daniel R. Dwight
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Daniel R. Dwight
--------------------------------------
Daniel R. Dwight
Acting Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 917 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 917

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1830 South Lake Drive in Lexington, South Carolina, as the ``Floyd 
                     Spence Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1830 
South Lake Drive in Lexington, South Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Floyd Spence Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Floyd Spence Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 26, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer ofWatson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)            the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  May 10,2004

 
|   | By:    | **/s/ Charles P. Slacik**                               |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Charles P. Slacik                                       |
|   |   | Executive Vice President – Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                           |

 

The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11 - Earnings per share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               1998           1997

<S>                                                        <C>            <C>        
Income (loss) from continuing operations                     (648,532)      (169,720)
Less dividends on preferred stock                              (8,141)        (8,142)
Income (loss) from continuing operations applicable
     to common shareholders                                  (656,673)      (177,862)
Less discontinued operations                                        0        (25,992)
Net (loss) applicable to common shareholders                 (656,673)      (203,854)

Weighted average common shares outstanding                  2,566,240      1,625,343
Weighted average options vested                                97,248        155,120

Net income (loss) per common share
     Basic                                                 $    (0.26)    $    (0.13)
     Diluted                                               $    (0.26)    $    (0.13)

</TABLE>
Order filed November 5, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00252-CV

____________

CHRISTOPHER MULGREW, Appellant

V.

SPECTRASEIS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-41761

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due October 18, 2013. No brief or motion for 

extension of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant submits a brief to the clerk of this court within thirty days 

of the date of this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
#### Jeff Russell TRAXTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sherri HOLMAN, Library Coordinator, Oregon Department of Corrections; Don Mills, Superintendent, DOC, Two Rivers Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-35063.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2012.*

*710Filed Jan. 3, 2013.

Jeff Russell Traxtle, Salem, OR, pro se.

David B. Thompson, Assistant Attorney General, AGOR-Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable without oral argument. *See*Fed. *710R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Oregon state prisoner Jeff Russell Trax-tle appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing as time-barred his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a violation of his constitutional right of access to the courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Douglas v. Noelle,*567 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir.2009), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Traxtle’s action as time-barred because his access-to-courts claim accrued more than two years before he filed his complaint. *See*Or.Rev.Stat. § 12.110(1) (two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims); *Douglas,*567 F.3d at 1109 (for § 1983 claims, courts apply the forum state’s statute of limitations for personal injury claims); *Morales v. City of Los Angeles,*214 F.3d 1151, 1154 (9th Cir.2000) (an access-to-courts claim accrues when the lower court issues its judgment in the underlying action, not when the appeals of that judgment have been exhausted).

Traxtle’s reliance on *Christopher v. Harbury,*536 U.S. 403, 122 S.Ct. 2179, 153 L.Ed.2d 413 (2002), is misplaced.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
38. Median weekly earnings of part-time wage and salary workers by selected characteristics

Characteristic

Number of workers

(in thousands) Median weekly earnings

1997 1998 1997 1998

SEX AND AGE

Total, 16 years and over ....................................................................................... 20,710 20,862 $149 $156

 Men, 16 years and over ....................................................................................... 6,454 6,501 139 146

 16 to 24 years ..................................................................................................... 3,479 3,582 114 119

 25 years and over ............................................................................................... 2,975 2,919 183 197

 Women, 16 years and over ................................................................................. 14,256 14,361 153 161

 16 to 24 years ..................................................................................................... 4,373 4,500 112 118

 25 years and over ............................................................................................... 9,883 9,861 179 191

RACE, HISPANIC ORIGIN, AND SEX

 White ................................................................................................................... 17,915 17,886 150 157

 Men .................................................................................................................... 5,462 5,470 138 146

 Women .............................................................................................................. 12,454 12,416 155 163

 Black .................................................................................................................... 1,968 2,096 141 149

 Men .................................................................................................................... 669 688 142 145

 Women .............................................................................................................. 1,299 1,408 140 151

 Hispanic origin ..................................................................................................... 1,877 1,828 144 154

 Men .................................................................................................................... 692 632 150 162

 Women .............................................................................................................. 1,184 1,196 140 150

 NOTE: Detail for the above race and Hispanic-origin groups will not

sum to totals because data for the "other races" group are not presented

and Hispanics are included in both the white and black population groups.

Beginning in January 1998, data reflect new composite estimation

procedures and revised population controls used in the household survey.

212
#### Alexander S. ORENSHTEYN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2011-1308.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 11, 2013.

Joseph J. Zito, Zito, tip, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Emerson V. Briggs, III.

Douglas J. Kline, Goodwin Procter, LLP, of Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were William A. Meunier; Timothy J. Rousseau, of New York, New York.

LOURIE, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1

================================================================================

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

                      OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF                [STAMP]

                              TBX RESOURCES, INC.

================================================================================

     The undersigned officer of the corporation, described herein, submits the
following amendment to the corporation's Articles of Incorporation to the
Secretary of State, State of Texas:

                                   ARTICLE I

     The date of incorporation was March 24, 1995, and the Charter Number is
1349922.

                                   ARTICLE II

     The article to be amended, Article Four of the Articles of Incorporation
of TBX Resources, Inc., states:

     The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have authority
     to issue is 100,000,000 of the par value of $0.01 (One Cent) each, all of
     which shares shall be known as Common Stock.

                                  ARTICLE III

     Article Four is to be amended as follows:

     The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have authority
     to issue is 10,000,000 of the par value of $0.01 (One Cent) each, all of
     which shall be known as Preferred Stock and 100,000,000 of the par value of
     $0.01 (One Cent) each, all of which shares shall be known as Common Stock.

                                   ARTICLE IV

     The date of adoption of this amendment is July 11, 2001.


ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT OF THE ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION OF TBX RESOURCES, INC. - PAGE 1
<PAGE>

                                   ARTICLE V

     The number of shares issued is 17,090,875. The following shareholders own
a total of 8,684,533 shares and have voted to approve this amendment. These
shareholders include T. Burroughs, J. Ayres, J. Clayton, C. Coley, D. York,
B. Boetler, E. Brenkus, B. Ligon-Dickens, E. Baldwin, PAX Energy, B. Hainey,
B. Pheland, M. Synder, J. Zager and C. Zager.

                                   ARTICLE VI

     The amendment will be effective upon filing.

     The manner of the adoption of these Articles of Amendment, and the vote by
which they were adopted, constitute full legal compliance with the provisions
of applicable law, the corporation's Articles of Incorporation, and the
Corporation's Bylaws.

     I HEREBY VERIFY, subject to the penalties of perjury that the statements
contained are true and correct.

     SIGNED on this the 17th day of July, 2001.



                                        /s/ TIMOTHY P. BURROUGHS
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Timothy P. Burroughs, President




ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT OF THE ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION OF TBX RESOURCES, INC. - PAGE 2