alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THEATTORNEYGENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

June 26, 1975 

The Honorable Bill McCoy 

Ector County Attorney 

Ector County Courthouse 

Odessa, Texas 79761 

Opinion No. H- 636 

Re: Whether a county may expend 

money from its general fund for construction,,of a drainage ditch. 

Dear Mr. McCoy: 

You have requested our opinion concerning whether a rounty~may expend 

money from its geIiera1 fund for construction of a drainage ditch; You explain 

that the Commissioners Court of Ector County has voted to enter an agreement 

with the City of Odessa whereby the county ~would contribute to the construction 

of a drainage ditch. You further note that Ector County has no Flood Control 

Fund. 

Article 1581e, section 3. V. T. C. S., provides in part: 

The Commissioners Court of any county in this State may 

contract and agree with any other county, political subdivision, governmental unit, or municipal corporation for the 

joint acquisition of right-of-ways, or joint construction or 

maintenance of canals, drains, levees and other improvements for flood control, and drainage as related to flooa 

control, and for making necessary outlets, and maintaining them. 

The proposed contract is therefore authorized by law and is a valid expenditure of county funds. In Bexar County v. Mann, 157 S. W. 2d 134,136 (Tex. 

Sup. 1941). the Texas Supreme~ Court stated: 

All county expenditures lawfully authorized to be made 

by a county must be paid out of the county’s general fund 

unless there is some law which makes them a charge 

against a special fund. 

Since we are aware of no special fund from which this expenditure is 

required to be made, in our opinion it is to be made from the county’s general 

fund. 

SUMMARY 

Where a county has no special fund from which 

p. 2883 
The Honorable Bill McCoy - Page 2 

expenditures for drainage ditches must be made, 

it may finance a contract for the construction of 

such ditches with money from its general fund. 

Attorney General of Texas 

-PROVED: 

jad 

p. 2884
EXHIBIT 12.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Zvi Slonimsky, as Chief Executive Officer of Alvarion Ltd. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission

(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 22, 2004



                                               /s/ Zvi Slonimsky
                                               Zvi Slonimsky
                                               Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
7.0% or more

6.0% to 6.9%5.0% to 5.9%4.0% to 4.9%3.9% or below

Unemployment Rate

Unemployment rates by county and disaster assistance elig

October 2005, not seasonally adjusted

(State rate = 5.1%; U.S. rate = 4.6%)

The nine laeligible for of Septemare eligible 

NOTE:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 BROOKSIDE
TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS CORP.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of
Brookside Technology Holdings Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15e for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidating subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Michael Nole

Michael NoleTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
# Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities Latest Numbers

Latest Numbers for Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

- Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities Latest Numbers Nonfatal injuries and illnesses, private industry															           Total recordable cases:					2,804,200  in  2022					Historical Data								           Cases involving days away from work:					1,184,200  in  2022					Historical Data													           Median days away from work (DAFW):					10  in  2022					Historical Data								           DAFW Cases involving sprains, strains, tears:					547,980  in  2022					Historical Data								           DAFW Cases involving injuries to the back:					250,830  in  2022					Historical Data								           DAFW Cases involving falls, slips, trips:					450,540  in  2022					Historical Data																				Fatal work-related injuries															           Total fatal injuries (all sectors):					5,486  in  2022					Historical Data								           Roadway incidents (all sectors):					1,369  in  2022					Historical Data								           Falls, slips, trips (all sectors):					865  in  2022					Historical Data								           Homicides (all sectors):					524  in  2022					Historical Data
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: 1ST INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY OF CENTRE COUNTY,

INVESTIGATION 11

PETITION OF: THE DISTRICT

ATTORNEY OF CENTRE COUNTY :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 63 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of April , 2017, the Petition for Review

, Application for

Stay , and the Motion to Seal are DENIED

.

This denial is WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the District Attorney to present a

reconsideration motion to the supervising judge of the grand jury.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Gavin Heath Gilbert, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00152

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.
1826694 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We further order that the appellant, Gavin Heath Gilbert, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 3, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-2168

In Re: KODILINYE OGONNA OJUKWU, 

 Petitioner. 

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. 

(8:09-cr-00470-PJM; 8:09-cv-02238-PJM; 8:09-mj-01457-TMD) 

Submitted: February 8, 2010 Decided: February 16, 2010 

Before MICHAEL, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Kodilinye Ogonna Ojukwu, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Kodilinye Ogonna Ojukwu has filed a petition for an 

original writ of habeas corpus challenging his ongoing detention 

and raising Fourth Amendment search and seizure issues related 

to his ongoing criminal trial in the United States District 

Court for the District of Maryland. 

 Because Ojukwu is not currently incarcerated within 

the Fourth Circuit, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the 

petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(a) (2006) (providing that a 

§ 2241 petition must be filed in the district or circuit of 

incarceration); In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 332 (4th Cir. 2000). 

Moreover, because the issues that Ojukwu seeks to raise may be 

adequately addressed through pretrial motions at his criminal 

trial, we find that it would not serve the interest of justice 

to transfer the petition to the United States District Court for 

the District of Columbia. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2006). We 

therefore deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

and dismiss the petition. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

PETITION DISMISSED
AMENDMENT NO. 8
                                       TO
                        SHAREHOLDER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT


The Shareholder Maintenance Agreement between The AAL Mutual Funds and AAL
Capital Management Corporation, as amended, effective April 1, 1995, is hereby
amended, July 1, 2000, as follows:

     1.   Schedule A,  attached to the  Shareholder  Maintenance  Agreement,  is
          amended  to add the AAL Large  Company  Index Fund II, The AAL Mid Cap
          Index Fund II,  The AAL Small Cap Index  Fund II,  The AAL  Aggressive
          Growth Fund and The AAL Technology Stock Fund.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Amendment to be signed by their
respective officers effective July 1, 2000.



ATTEST:                                      THE AAL MUTUAL FUNDS

By: /s/Frederick D. Kelsven                  By: /s/Robert G. Same
    --------------------------------             -------------------------------
    Frederick D. Kelsven                         Robert G. Same



ATTEST:                                      AAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

By: /s/Frederick D. Kelsven                  By: /s/Robert G. Same
    --------------------------------             -------------------------------
    Frederick D. Kelsven                         Robert G. Same




                                    EXHIBIT A
                                       TO
                     THE SHAREHOLDER MAINTAINENCE AGREEMENT
                            (EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2000)


1.   The AAL Capital Growth Fund

2.   The AAL Bond Fund

3.   The AAL Municipal Bond Fund

4.   The AAL Money Market Fund

5.   The AAL U.S Government Zero Coupon Target Fund, Series 2001

6.   The AAL U.S Government Zero Coupon Target Fund, Series 2006

7.   The AAL Mid Cap Stock Fund (f/k/a The AAL Smaller Company Stock Fund)

8.   The AAL Equity Income Fund (f/k/a The AAL Utilities Fund)

9.   The AAL International Fund

10.  The AAL Small Cap Stock Fund

11.  The AAL High Yield Bond Fund

12.  The AAL Balanced Fund

13.  The AAL Large Company Index Fund

14.  The AAL Mid Cap Index Fund

15.  The AAL Bond Index Fund

16.  The AAL Large Company Index Fund II

17.  The AAL Mid Cap Index Fund II

18.  The AAL Small Cap Index Fund II

19.  The AAL Aggressive Growth Fund

20.  The AAL Technology Stock Fund
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 26, 2023

No. 04-23-00051-CR

IN RE Victor Manuel REGINO DE LA ROSA

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

On January 12, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a 

motion for stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of 

mandamus, which this court granted in part on January 13, 2023. After considering the petition, 

real party in interest’s response, relator’s reply, and this record, this court concludes relator is not 

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The stay imposed on January 13, 2023 is LIFTED.

It is so ORDERED on April 26, 2023.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of April, 2023.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11179CR, styled State of Texas v. Victor Manuel Regino De La Rosa, 

pending in the County Court, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth presiding.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 710 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Private Calendar No. 6
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 710

                          [Report No. 108-776]

   For the relief of Mrs. Florence Narusewicz of Erie, Pennsylvania.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

 Mr. English introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                           November 17, 2004

       Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   For the relief of Mrs. Florence Narusewicz of Erie, Pennsylvania.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF VETERANS BENEFIT AUTHORIZED.

    Notwithstanding sections 5121(a) and 5122 of title 38, United 
States Code, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall pay to Mrs. 
Florence Narusewicz of Erie, Pennsylvania, the sum of $28,000, 
representing the amount of an award for a disability incurred by her 
husband Leo E. Narusewicz during active military service in World War 
II, which was paid to Mr. Narusewicz in two installment checks, neither 
of which could be deposited or cashed by Mrs. Narusewicz after his 
death.
                                                 Private Calendar No. 6

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 710

                          [Report No. 108-776]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   For the relief of Mrs. Florence Narusewicz of Erie, Pennsylvania.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 17, 2004

       Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT




Board of Directors and Stockholders
Slippery Rock Financial Corporation

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Slippery Rock
Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of June 30, 2001, and the related
consolidated statement of income for the three- and six-month periods ended June
30, 2001 and 2000, and the consolidated statement cash flows for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the consolidated statement of changes
in stockholders' equity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2001. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report
dated January 26, 2001 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements.



/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
Wexford, PA
August 3, 2001
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        COLLECTIBLE CONCEPTS GROUP, INC.

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 29, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  I, Paul
Lipschutz,  Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and will be retained by Collectible
Concepts Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.

Date:  March 23, 2005


/s/ Paul Lipschutz
---------------------------
Paul Lipschutz
Principal Financial Officer
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x 

ANTHONY STOKES, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JOHN STEPHENS a/k/a JOHN LEGEND, 

SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, 

COLUMBIA RECORDS, GETTING OUT OUR 

DREAMS, INC. d/b/a G.O.O.D. Music, JOHN 

DOES 1-20, fictitious persons, and XYZ 

CORPORATIONS 1-20, fictitious entities, 

Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x 

CASE NO.: 2:11-cv-03849 

(SDW) (MCA) 

ECF CASE

RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE FOR 

DEFENDANT GETTING OUT 

OUR DREAMS, INC. d/b/a 

G.O.O.D. MUSIC 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, the undersigned counsel for Defendants 

GETTING OUT OUR DREAMS, INC. d/b/a G.O.O.D. Music (“GM,” erroneously sued herein as 

GETTING OUT OUR DREAMS MUSIC), certifies as follows: 

GM is a privately-held and non-publicly traded company, and has no publicly traded parent 

companies. 

Dated: September 13, 2011 

 New York, New York 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 

 By:__s/ Dolores DiBella_________ 

 Dolores F. DiBella (DD 9637) 

Eleven Times Square 

New York, New York 10036 

Telephone: 212.969.3000 

Facsimile: 212.969.2900 

ddibella@proskauer.com 

 Attorney for Defendants 

Case 2:11-cv-03849-SDW -MCA Document 9 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 61
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I caused the following counsel of record for Plaintiff to be served with a 

copy of the foregoing document via ECF, on this 13th of September 2011: 

Louis D. Tambaro, Esq. 

Marks & Klein, LLP 

63 Riverside Avenue 

Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 

Telephone: (732) 747-7100 

Facsimile: (732) 219-0625 

Dated: September 13, 2011 

 __ s/ Dolores F. DiBella__________ 

 Dolores F. DiBella (DD 9637) 

Case 2:11-cv-03849-SDW -MCA Document 9 Filed 09/13/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 62
Case 2:11-cr-00404-SDW Document 19 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 29
Case 2:11-cr-00404-SDW Document 19 Filed 07/14/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 30
EX-10.19



 Exhibit 10.19 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 AMENDMENT dated as of
March 6, 2013 to the Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2008 between Leonard Osser (the “Executive”) and Milestone Scientific Inc. (the “Company”). 

W I T N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, the Agreement was suspended with a remaining 40-month term upon the entry of the Executive and the Company into the Employment Agreement dated as of September 1, 2008; and 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to extend the employment term under the Agreement; 

NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Extension of Term. The term of employment under the Agreement is hereby extended to a term of 120-months from the date on which employment of the
Executive recommences. 

  

	 	2.	Full Force and Effect. Except as amended hereby all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

 MILESTONE SCIENTIFIC INC. 
  

									
	By:	 	/s/ Joseph D’Agostino	 		  	/s/ Leonard Osser	  	
		 	Joseph D’Agostino	 		  	Leonard Osser	  	
		 	Chief Financial Officer	 		  		  	
		 	Chief Operating Officer