alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

49. Certification and licensing status of the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years and over by

employment status, 2018 annual averages

Employment status

Number of persons (in thousands) Percent distribution

Total

With a certification or license1

Total

With a certification or license1

Total

With a

certification,

but no

license

With a

license2

Without

a

certification

or

license

Total

With a

certification,

but no

license

With a

license2

Without

a

certification

or

license

Civilian noninstitutional population............ 257,791 43,691 4,197 39,495 214,099 100.0 16.9 1.6 15.3 83.1

Civilian labor force........................... 162,075 38,321 3,658 34,664 123,753 100.0 23.6 2.3 21.4 76.4

Employed................................... 155,761 37,556 3,546 34,010 118,205 100.0 24.1 2.3 21.8 75.9

Usually work full time................... 128,572 32,533 3,152 29,381 96,040 100.0 25.3 2.5 22.9 74.7

Usually work part time................. 27,189 5,024 394 4,630 22,165 100.0 18.5 1.4 17.0 81.5

Unemployed................................ 6,314 765 112 654 5,549 100.0 12.1 1.8 10.4 87.9

Not in the labor force........................ 95,716 5,370 539 4,831 90,346 100.0 5.6 0.6 5.0 94.4

1 A person may have more than one certification or license.

2 Persons with a license may also have a certification.

NOTE: Certifications are issued by a non-governmental certification body and convey that an individual has the knowledge or skill to perform a

specific job. A license is awarded by a government agency and conveys a legal authority to work in an occupation. Full time is 35 hours or more per

week; part time is less than 35 hours. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                MAJOR SUBSIDIARIES OF PETROCHINA COMPANY LIMITED



I.     WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES


1.     Daqing Oilfield Limited Company

2.     PetroChina International Limited

3.     PetroChina International Indonesia Limited



II.    CONTROLLED SUBSIDIARIES


1.     Liaohe Jinma Oilfield Company Limited (81.82% owned by us)

2.     Daqing Yu Shu Lin Oilfield Company Limited (88.16% owned by us)

3.     Jilin Chemical Industrial Company Limited (67.29% owned by us)

4.     Jinzhou Petrochemical Limited Company (80.95% owned by us)



                                        1
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of PrincipalFinancial Officer**

**Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. of Section 1350, as Created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

The undersigned officerof Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

(i)                                     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date:    August 6, 2007 | ** ** | ** **                                                |
|----------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | By:        | **/s/ R.  Todd Joyce**                                    |
|                                   |       | R. Todd Joyce                                             |
|                                   |       | Vice President –  Corporate Controller and Treasurer |
|                                   |       | (Principal  Financial Officer)                            |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany theReport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

----
EXHIBIT 8

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

NAME OF WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY                                   LOCATION
Alvarion, Inc.                                                    Delaware
Alvarion UK LTD.                                                  United Kingdom
Alvarion Uruguay SA                                               Uruguay
Alvarion SARL*                                                    France
Alvarion Asia Pacific Ltd.                                        Hong Kong
Floware Do Brasil LTDA                                            Brazil
Alvarion Japan KK                                                 Japan
Alvarion SRL                                                      Romania
Alvarion GmbH*                                                    Germany
Alvarion Israel (2003) Ltd.                                       Israel
Kermadec Telecom B.V.                                             Netherlands
Tadipol-ECI Sp.z o.o.                                             Poland
InnoWave Telsiz Sistemleri Ticaret A.(a).                           Turkey
Floware Inc. (inactive)                                           United States
Breezecom (UK) Ltd. (inactive)                                    United Kingdom

*Alvarion SARL and Alvarion GmbH are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Alvarion UK
LTD.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 861

To provide that the individual income tax rate reductions of the Economic 

Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall be permanent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To provide that the individual income tax rate reductions 

of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation 

Act of 2001 shall be permanent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Income 

5 Tax Rate Reduction Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX RATE REDUCTIONS MADE 

7 PERMANENT. 

8 Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 

9 Reconciliation Act of 2001 (Public Law 107–16) is 
2

•HR 861 IH 

1 amended by adding at the end the following new sub2 section: 

3 ‘‘(c) EXCEPTION.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall not 

4 apply to the provisions of, and amendments made by, title 

5 I (relating to individual income tax rate reductions).’’.

Æ
Order entered May 29, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00340-CR

JANINE JOYCE CHARBONEAU, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-80751-2012

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s May 23, 2014 motion to extend time to file its brief. 

WE ORDER the State’s brief received on May 23, 2014 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
# laucnty18

&8Page &P of &N
# 1992-2002

Fatal occupational injuries to crossing guards in the education services; executive, legislative, and general government; and justice 1992-2002 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries to crossing guards in the education services; executive, legislative, and general government; and justice 1992-2002		

Fatal occupational injuries to crossing guards in the education services; executive, legislative, and general government; and justice 1992-2002 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries to crossing guards in the education services; executive, legislative, and general government; and justice 1992-2002		

Page &P	

# 2003-2017
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 26, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01002-CV

VALPAK DIRECT MARKETING SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant

V.

COLONIAL SAVINGS, F.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-03570-2018

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Pedersen, III

Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III

Before the Court is the parties’ February 19, 2019 joint motion to dismiss the appeal. In 

the motion, they state they have reached an agreement to compromise and settle their differences. 

We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.

181002F.P05

/Bill Pedersen, III/

BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

VALPAK DIRECT MARKETING 

SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant

No. 05-18-01002-CV V.

COLONIAL SAVINGS, F.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-03570-2018.

Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III, 

Justices Brown and Schenck participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 26th day of February, 2019.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 BROOKSIDE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS CORP
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB/A of Brookside Technology Holdings
Corp;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15e for the small business issuer and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidating subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Bryan McGuire

Bryan McGuireTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
S07A0835.

#### TUTTLE v. RYAN et al.

(653 SE2d 50)

HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice.

When Porter Morrison Ryan (“Ryan”) died in December 2003, she was survived by her daughter, appellant Mary Frances Tuttle, and two grandchildren, appellees Anthony V. Ryan III and Dawn Galloway, the children of her son Anthony V. Ryan, Jr. Appellant petitioned to probate a will executed by Ryan in 1956; appellees filed a caveat, contending that the 1956 will had been revoked by a will executed in 1999. Appellees petitioned to probate the 1999 will and appellant filed a caveat, challenging Ryan’s testamentary capacity. After a bench trial in October 2005, the probate court admitted the 1999 will into probate and appellant filed this appeal. Because there is evidence to support the probate court’s judgment, we affirm.

> [Ryan] possessed the mental capacity to make a will if she understood that a will had the effect of disposing of her property at the time of her death, was capable of remembering generally what property was subject to disposition by will and remembering those persons related to her, and was capable of expressing an intelligent scheme of disposition.

(Citation omitted.) *Quarterman v. Quarterman,*268 Ga. 807 (1) (493 SE2d 146) (1997). “The controlling question is ‘whether [Ryan] had sufficient testamentary capacity *at the time of executing the will.’*[Cit.]” (Emphasis in original.) *Ashford v. Van Horne,*276 Ga. 636, 637 (1) (580 SE2d 201) (2003). Testimony from the attorney who prepared and witnessed the self-proved will, see OCGA § 53-4-24, an associate who also witnessed Ryan’s execution of the will, and the legal secretary who was present and notarized the will supported the probate court’s finding that Ryan possessed the necessary testamentary capacity at the time the 1999 will was executed.

> A trial court’s factual findings in a non-jury trial may not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. Where, as here, the *653findings of the probate court are supported by any evidence, they will not be disturbed on appeal.

Decided November 5, 2007.

*Savage, Turner, Pinson & Karsman, Christopher D. Britt,*for appellant.

*Lewis, Owens & Mulherin, George L. Lewis,*for appellees.

(Citations omitted.) *Glaze v. Lemaster,*279 Ga. 361, 362 (2) (613 SE2d 617) (2005).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000109219-JUL-201208:42 AM
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chairman and Chief Executive Officer****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002**

 

The undersigned officerof Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:    November  5, 2004 | By:                                                                  | **/s/  Allen Chao** |
|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
| ** **                                     | ** **                                                           |
| ** **                                     | **Allen Chao, Ph.D.**                                                |
|                                           | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelyto accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filedfor purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Table 12. Employed women by occupation, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, 2007 annual averages

(Percent distribution)

 Total, 16 years and over (thousands)................................... 54,503 8,551 3,162 8,072

 Percent.......................................................................... 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Management, professional, and related occupations ..................... 39.5 31.2 46.8 23.1

Management, business, and financial operations occupations ... 13.9 11.0 15.7 8.6

Professional and related occupations ......................................... 25.6 20.3 31.1 14.5

Service occupations ....................................................................... 19.3 26.8 18.9 30.7

Sales and office occupations .......................................................... 34.4 32.7 26.0 33.1

Sales and related occupations .................................................... 12.3 11.7 11.4 12.4

Office and administrative support occupations ........................... 22.1 21.0 14.7 20.7

Natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations .... 1.0 .8 .9 1.8

Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations ................................. .3 .2 .3 1.0

Construction and extraction occupations .................................... .4 .3 .1 .6

Installation, maintenance, and repair occupations ...................... .3 .3 .5 .2

Production, transportation, and material moving occupations ........ 5.7 8.5 7.4 11.3

Production occupations ............................................................... 3.9 5.4 6.3 8.0

Transportation and material moving occupations ....................... 1.9 3.1 1.0 3.3

 SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Occupation White

Black or 

African 

American

Asian

Hispanic or 

Latino 

ethnicity

39
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Louis PATINO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10351

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2012.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jerry Van Beard, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Bonita L. Gun-den, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Amarillo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Louis Patino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*
      *396386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Patino has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Patino’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” *United States v. Cantwell,*470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Patino’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey Latest Numbers

Latest Numbers for Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

- Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey Latest Numbers Latest Job Openings Level:					8,488,000(p)  in Mar 2024					Historical Data								           Latest Job Openings Rate:					5.1%(p)  in Mar 2024					Historical Data								           Latest Hires Rate:					3.5%(p)  in Mar 2024					Historical Data								           Latest Total Separations Rate:					3.3%(p)  in Mar 2024					Historical Data								           Latest Quits Rate:					2.1%(p)  in Mar 2024					Historical Data								           Latest Layoffs/Discharges Rate:					1.0%(p)  in Mar 2024					Historical Data																p- preliminary
30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Chart 5-4. The employment-population ratios for adult men 

and women have edged up since mid-2003

Adult men

Adult women

Teenagers

Percent

NOTE: Shaded areas represent recessions. Data are seasonally adjusted.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 5-4. The employment-population ratios for adult men 

and women have edged up since mid-2003

• The employment-population ratio (the proportion of the population that is 

employed) for adult men has hovered around 72 percent since the early 1980s, 

with the exception of cyclical declines during recessions. The ratio for adult 

women—57.6 percent in 2005—rose markedly over the past several decades 

(although there were also cyclical swings), reflecting the dramatic influx of 

women into the job market. 

• The employment-population ratios for adult men and women declined during 

the 2001 recession, but have edged up since mid-2003.

• The employment-population ratio for teenagers fell steeply from 2000 to 2003, 

and has leveled off since. The teen ratio is more cyclically sensitive than that 

for adults.
### The AAL Mutual Funds

#### Supplement to Prospectus dated June 27, 2003
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITEDSTATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to theundersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended January 2,2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) theinformation contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended January 2, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: March 11, 2011 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.