alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1



I, Daniel Keesman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of LION bioscience Aktiengesellschaft;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal controls
over financial reporting.



Date: September 24,
2004



|       |  |                                                       
|------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Daniel Keesman                                    
|Name:  |  | Daniel Keesman                                        
|Title: |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                         8907
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12692
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1048
<INVENTORY>                                    13046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               35641
<PP&E>                                         77573
<DEPRECIATION>                                 35986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 84214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          44991
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       23485
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   84214
<SALES>                                        188756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192146
<CGS>                                          170216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               171
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (653)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
|Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report
of Havas (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Alain de Pouzilhac, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)
         The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operation of the Company.


Date: May 28, 2004
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Alain de Pouzilhac 
      
      Alain de Pouzilhac
      Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 No’s. 333-47646, 333-55504, 333-74768, 333-120091 and 333-130571) of Microtune, Inc. of our reports dated March 13, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Microtune, Inc.,Microtune, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Microtune, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

Dallas, Texas 

March 13, 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-60169

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE ALLRED,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:96-CV-049-S

- - - - - - - - - -

October 22, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

George Allred, federal prisoner # 08556042, seeks to proceed

in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the judgment of the

district court dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion with

prejudice. Allred’s contentions that 1) counsel was ineffective

in failing to argue that the Government violated the antishuttling provision of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act

(IADA) and 2) that the district court violated the Due Process

Clause by not adhering to the anti-shuttling policy present no
No. 97-60169

-2-

legal points arguable on their merits. See Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). The provision did not apply to

Allred because Mississippi had not enacted the IADA. See

Birdwell v. Skeen, 983 F.2d 1332, 1335 (5th Cir. 1993). The

motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a);

Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The remaining motions are also DENIED. 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.

Rule 42.2.
Exhibit 13.2



LION BIOSCIENCE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of LION bioscience Aktiengesellschaft (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin Hollenhorst, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2004 and results of operations of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2004.



/s/ Martin HollenhorstName:

Martin Hollenhorst,Title:

Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

September 24, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 29, 2014

No. 04-14-00414-CV

Whitney BREWSTER, In her capacity as executive director of The Texas Department of Motor 

Vehicles,

Appellant

v.

Drew ROICKI and Richard Roicki As Successors in Interest to Pinnacle Motors,

Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-06565

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee's second motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time 

is extended to October 30, 2014.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5420 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5420

To provide that funds received as universal service contributions under 
section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 and the universal service 
   support programs established pursuant thereto are not subject to 
 certain provisions of title 31, United States Code, commonly known as 
             the Antideficiency Act, for a period of time.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2004

  Mr. Markey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that funds received as universal service contributions under 
section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 and the universal service 
   support programs established pursuant thereto are not subject to 
 certain provisions of title 31, United States Code, commonly known as 
             the Antideficiency Act, for a period of time.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Universal Service Antideficiency 
Suspension Act''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF CERTAIN TITLE 31 PROVISIONS TO UNIVERSAL SERVICE 
              FUND.

    (a) In General.--During the period beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2005, section 1341 and 
subchapter II of chapter 15 of title 31, United States Code, do not 
apply--
            (1) to any amount collected or received as Federal 
        universal service contributions required by section 254 of the 
        Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254), including any 
        interest earned on such contributions; nor
            (2) to the expenditure or obligation of amounts 
        attributable to such contributions for universal service 
        support programs established pursuant to that section.
    (b) Post-2005 Fulfillment of Protected Obligations.--Section 1341 
and subchapter II of chapter 15 of title 31, United States Code, do not 
apply after December 31, 2005, to an expenditure or obligation 
described in subsection (a)(2) made or authorized during the period 
described in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
###                             THE AAL MUTUAL FUNDS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 20
- 00139
- CV

In re WC 1st and Trinity, LP; WC 1st and Trinity GP, LLC; WC 3rd and Congress LP; and WC 3rd and Congress GP, LLC

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

R eal party in interest, the Mitte Foundation, has filed a motion for en banc
reconsideration of this Court ’ s February 28, 2020 order granting relators ’ emergency motion for temporary relief. Our order tempora r ily stay ed the portion of t he trial court ’ s F e bruary 18 , 2020
order re quiring relators to produce Nate Paul for depositi on on or before March 2, 2020

.

In its motion, Mitte asserts that the Court ’ s s tay of the deposition is effectively a
decisi on on the mer its o f relators ’ p etition for w rit of m anda mus becaus e the parti es have a
trial

- c ourt hearing scheduled at 9:00 a.m. on March 9, 2020

. I n effect , Mitte argu es t hat it should not be required to participate in the hearing until the Court has resolved the petition for writ of
mand amus. To address Mi tte ’ s conc er n , the Court stays the trial

- court hearing , p ending further
order of the Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b) (establishing that court on its own initiative may without notice grant any just relief pending its action on petition); see also In r e K elleher ,2

999 S.W.2d 51, 52 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 1999, n o pet.) (explaining that Rule 52.10 allows appellate court to maintain status quo until it can address dispute raised by original proceeding).

The petitio n for writ of mandamus remains pending befor e th is Court. In a separate notice issued today, t he Court has denie d the motion for en banc reconsideration.

It is ordered on March 6, 2020

.

Before Ch i ef Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5202

AN ACT

To clarify the treatment of supplemental appropria2005. cable for continuing appropriations for fiscal year tions in calculating the rate for operations appli-

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5202

AN ACT

To clarify the treatment of supplemental appropriations in

calculating the rate for operations applicable for continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2005.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5202 EH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF SUPPLE2 MENTAL APPROPRIATIONS IN CALCULATING

3 RATE FOR OPERATIONS.

4 For purposes of the application of section 103 of

5 Public Law 108–309, supplemental appropriations shall

6 be included in the calculation of the rate for operations

7 only in accordance with the attachments to Office of Man8 agement and Budget Bulletin No. 04–05 entitled ‘‘Appor9 tionment of the Continuing Resolution(s) for Fiscal Year

10 2005’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 4,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
[No. 53806-3-I.

Division One.

November 14, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Alem Kassa Gugsa, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-1-08131-7, Michael Hayden, J., entered February 9, 2004. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5274 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5274

     To create an additional judgeship for the eastern district of 
                  California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 2004

    Mr. Thomas (for himself, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Herger, Mr. Matsui, Mr. 
    Doolittle, Mr. Ose, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Radanovich, and Mr. Cardoza) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To create an additional judgeship for the eastern district of 
                  California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Additional Permanent District Judgeship.--The President shall 
appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional 
district judge for the eastern district of California.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--In order that the table 
under section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, will reflect the 
change in the number of permanent judgeships authorized for the eastern 
district of California by subsection (a), such table is amended in the 
item relating to the eastern district of California by striking ``6'' 
and inserting ``7''.
                                 <all>
```
# 2007-10

test 2008 - continued		

test 2008		

test 2008 - continued		

test 2008		

Page &P
Exhibit 31.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES


EXCHANGE


ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Bruce R. Knooihuizen, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rackspace Hosting, Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. [This certification is intentionally omitted because this amendment does not contain financial statements or other financial information.];




4. [This certification is intentionally omitted because this amendment does not contain or amend disclosure pursuant to Item 307 or 308 of Regulation S-K, and such disclosure is not otherwise required to be amended given the nature and reasons for the amendment.]; and




5. [This certification is intentionally omitted because this amendment does not contain or amend disclosure pursuant to Item 307 or 308 of Regulation S-K, and such disclosure is not otherwise required to be amended given the nature and reasons for the amendment.].





Date: July 19, 2010



By:

/s/ Bruce R. KnooihuizenBruce R. KnooihuizenChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

SAMUEL & STEIN 

David M. Nieporent (DN-9400)

38 West 32nd Street, Suite 1110 

New York, NY 10001 

Phone: (212) 563-9884 

Fax: (212) 563-9870 

Email: dnieporent@samuelandstein.com

Theodore H. Frank (pro hac vice pending) 

CENTER FOR CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS LLC 

1718 M Street NW, No. 236 

Washington, DC 20036 

Phone: (703) 203-3848 

Email: tedfrank@gmail.com

Attorneys for Objector 

Mark Petri 

In re Johnson & Johnson Derivative 

Litigation; 

In re Johnson & Johnson FCPA 

Shareholder Derivative Litigation; 

Copeland v. Prince, et al.

Case Nos.: 

10-CV-2033-FLW 

11-CV-2511-FLW 

11-CV-4993-FLW 

DECLARATION OF MARK G. 

PETRI IN SUPPORT OF 

OBJECTION 

Case 3:11-cv-02511-FLW-DEA Document 61-3 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 922
2

Now comes Mark George Petri, Esq., and states the following under 

oath and under penalty of perjury in support of his objection: 

1. My name is Mark George Petri. I am a Johnson & Johnson 

shareholder, and I object to this zero-dollar settlement. 

2. My address is 9822 North Valley Hill Drive, Mequon, WI 53092. 

My phone number is (262) 241-3537. I recently retired as president and 

CEO of Rite-Hite Holdings, Inc. Before that, I was a partner at the law firm 

of Foley & Lardner. I can be contacted through my pro bono attorney, 

Theodore H. Frank of the non-profit Center for Class Action Fairness. 

3. I have sole control over two accounts that hold Johnson & Johnson 

stock. In my Computershare Trust account number ending in 320, I held 

1,035.245181 shares on July 11, 2012, and hold the same amount today. 

This figure reflects an original purchase of 125 shares in 1988, continuously 

held through stock splits and dividend reinvestments; I have not sold any of 

this stock since the original 1988 purchase. Computershare issues statements 

to me once every three months. A true and correct copy of a redacted 

statement from Computershare dated June 12, 2012, is attached as Exhibit 1. 

4. In my Charles Schwab account with a number ending in 511, I held 

214.7419 shares on July 11, 2012, and hold the same amount today. A true 

and correct copy of a redacted statement from Charles Schwab dated June 

30, 2012, is attached as Exhibit 2. A true and correct copy of a 

Case 3:11-cv-02511-FLW-DEA Document 61-3 Filed 08/31/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 923
Case 3:11-cv-02511-FLW-DEA Document 61-3 Filed 08/31/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 924
Employment in thousands

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

110,000

120,000

130,000

140,000

1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Chart 1-7. Nonfarm payroll employment has risen by 4.6 

million since its recent low in August 2003

NOTE: Shaded areas represent recessions. Data are seasonally adjusted.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 1-7. Nonfarm payroll employment has risen by 4.6 

million since its recent low in August 2003

• Nonfarm payroll employment fell by about 2.7 million from the beginning of 

the recession in March 2001 to August 2003. 

• Between August 2003 and December 2005, payroll employment increased by 

about 4.6 million, with large gains in construction, professional and business 

services, health care, and leisure and hospitality.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MOUNTAIN CREEK PROPERTIES, LP,

Petitioner

v.

HONORABLE SUSAN DAY, MAGISTERIAL 

DISTRICT JUDGE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 181 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of March, 2021, the “Petition for Issuance of Writ of 

Mandamus” is DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist 

from the caption.