alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 704 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 704

     To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
Agriculture to conduct a joint special resources study to evaluate the 
 suitability and feasibility of establishing the area known as the Rim 
of the Valley Corridor as a unit of the Santa Monica Mountains National 
  Recreation Area in the State of California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

   Mr. Schiff (for himself, Mr. Dreier, Mr. Berman, Mr. Sherman, Ms. 
 Solis, and Mr. George Miller of California) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
Agriculture to conduct a joint special resources study to evaluate the 
 suitability and feasibility of establishing the area known as the Rim 
of the Valley Corridor as a unit of the Santa Monica Mountains National 
  Recreation Area in the State of California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Rim of the Valley Corridor Study 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RIM OF THE VALLEY CORRIDOR STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
Agriculture (in this Act referred to as the ``Secretaries'') shall 
conduct a joint special resource study of the lands, waters, and 
interests of the area comprising the Rim of the Valley Corridor in 
Southern California, as depicted on the map entitled ``SANTA MONICA 
MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY ZONE--RIM OF THE VALLEY CORRIDOR Parklands and 
Open Space'' and dated July 30, 2002.
    (b) Study Topics.--The study shall evaluate the suitability and 
feasibility of establishing the area as a unit of the Santa Monica 
Mountains National Recreation Area.
    (c) Criteria.--In conducting the study authorized by this section, 
the Secretaries shall use the criteria for the study for areas for 
potential inclusion in the National Park System contained in section 
8(c) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)).
    (d) Consultation.--In conducting the study authorized by this 
section, the Secretaries shall consult with appropriate State, county 
and local government entities.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

     There are authorized to be appropriated such funds as may be 
necessary to carry out the purposes of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# American Time Use Survey Latest Numbers

Latest Numbers for American Time Use Survey, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

- American Time Use Survey Latest Numbers AVERAGE HOURS PER DAY											           Household activities:					1.89  in  2022					Historical Data								           Eating and drinking:					1.23  in  2022					Historical Data								           Leisure and sports:					5.20  in  2022					Historical Data								           Sleeping:					9.02  in  2022					Historical Data								           Caring for and helping household children, parents:					1.34  in  2022					Historical Data								           Working, employed persons:					5.08  in  2022					Historical Data								           Working on days worked, employed persons:					7.69  in  2022					Historical Data																		PERCENT PARTICIPATING ON AN AVERAGE DAY															           Working, employed persons:					66.1  in  2022					Historical Data								           Participating in sports, exercise, and recreation:					20.1  in  2022					Historical Data
[No. 54347-4-I.

Division One.

December 19, 2005.]

#### Kathleen M. Gray, *Appellant,*v. Morgan Stanley DW Inc. et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kang County, No. 02-2-26118-3, Laura Gene Middaugh, J., entered February 18, March 11, and May 13, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J., concurred in by Grosse and Agid, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 135 (Thursday, July 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16957]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-09-021]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: July 20, 2009 at 1 p.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered

    1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-466 and 731-TA-1162 (Preliminary)(Wire Decking 
from China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled 
to transmit its determinations to the Secretary of Commerce on July 20, 
2009; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted 
to the Secretary of Commerce on or before July 27, 2009.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting. Earlier announcement of this meeting 
was not possible.

    Issued: July 13, 2009.

    By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E9-16957 Filed 7-14-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-138420, 333-134542, 333-124969,
333-123816, 333-108009, 333-91072, 333-91070, 333-72194, 333-55520, 333-39928) on Form S-8 of
Occam Networks, Inc. and subsidiary of our report dated March 10, 2008 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting,
included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Occam Networks, Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Our
report dated March 10, 2008, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, expressed an opinion that Occam
Networks, Inc. and subsidiary had not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

/s/
SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP

Los
Angeles, California
March 10, 2008

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Saul Castillo, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 631]

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of the defendant’s arguments relating to the County Court’s suppression determination *(see People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; *People v Williams,*36 NY2d 829, 830 [1975], *cert denied*423 US 873 [1975]).

Insofar as the defendant contends that, while in the course of translating into Spanish the statements made by the court during the course of the plea proceedings, the official court interpreter told him that he would be free to withdraw his plea at any time prior to sentence and for any reason, and to the extent that the defendant thus argues that the official court interpreter essentially led him to believe that the court had promised him something that the court, in fact, never promised, this argument is “unsupported by the existing record” *(People v Wen Quing Lu,*240 AD2d 197, 197 [1997]). Rivera, J.P., Lifson, Florio and Chambers, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Amendment
No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Simula, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley P. Forst,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:






| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                        
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company for the periods presented.




| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Bradley P. Forst   
| |                        
| | Bradley P. Forst       
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | November 5, 2003
d1364174_ex4-12.htm


Exhibit 4.12







ADDENDUM No. 2


to


the Management Agreement dated 16/05/2011 and any addenda thereto


(the "Management Agreement")







Between


POLYARISTI NAVIGATION CO.


of Liberia


(as Owner)







And







ALLSEAS MARINE S.A.


of Liberia


(as Manager)







In respect of the management of the Vessel BOX VOYAGER (the "Vessel")







Notwithstanding the relevant provisions of the Management Agreement, it is this, 18th day of September 2012, mutually agreed between the Owner and the Manager that a clause 8.05 shall be added to read as follows:







"Unless the agreement is terminated by the Owner in accordance with Clauses 12.03 (iii) and (iv) of this Agreement or by reason of default by gross negligence or misconduct of Manager, its Directors, officers and/or employees in the performance under this Agreement, upon termination of this Agreement in relation to the Vessel, the Management Fee will be continued at the above rate then in effect for 90 days from the date of termination. This is to cover operating and accounting cost of finalizing the Vessels' disbursements, demurrage, etc. In addition, the Owner shall continue to pay the following:








	
  

	
i)

	
Crew support costs for a further period of three calendar months








	
  

	
ii)

	
An equitable proportion of any management staff redundancy costs which may materialize.












Notwithstanding the above, in the event that the Management Agreement is terminated in accordance with Clause 12.05, then the provisions of the Compensation Agreement between the Manager and Box Ships Inc. dated 12/09/2012, copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, forming an integral part of this Agreement, or any renewal thereof shall be applied."







All other fees, terms, conditions and provisions of the Management Agreement remain unaltered and in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have signed this Addendum this 18th day of September, 2012.



	
 

	
 


	
FOR THE OWNER

	
FOR THE MANAGER


	
 

	
 


	
/s/ Maria Stefanou

	
/s/  George Skrimizeas


	
MARIA STEFANOU

	
GEORGE SKRIMIZEAS


	
Attorney-in-fact

	
Attorney-in-fact
Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursu ant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32. 3 

# United Stat es Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit

No. 03-1521 DAVID E. BROWN, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. MICHAEL T. MALONEY, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Nathaniel M Gorton, U.S. District Judge ] Before Torruella, Circuit Judge , Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge , and Lynch, Circuit Judge .
David E. Brown on brief pro se. Nanc y An kers White , Special Assistant Attorney General, and Kevin A. Anahory , Lega l Division, Department of Correction, on brief for appellees.
July 27, 2004-2- Per Curiam . After carefully considering the briefs and recordon appeal, we affirmfor substantially the reasons stated by the district court. Among other considerations, the appellant failed to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act andthe Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C. § 749; Parker v. Universidad de Puerto Rico , 225 F.3d1, 4 (1 st Cir. 2000). The court did not abuse its discretion in denying his second motion to amend his complaint. Mirpuri v. Act Mfg., Inc ., 212 F.3d 624 (1 st Cir. 2000).

Affirmed . 1 st Cir. R. 27(c).
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19 - 0288

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CLIFFTON WELLS,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, and good cause shown, Appellant is hereby granted an extension of time until December 30, 2020, within which to file and serve Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 20 2020

11/20/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0288
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-40108

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO ARAIZA-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:18-CR-354-1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco AraizaRodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Araiza-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 30, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-40108 Document: 00515181040 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/30/2019
No. 19-40108

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-40108 Document: 00515181040 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/30/2019
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PATRICK DELACRUZ MORENO,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-12-00028-CR 

Appeal from the

112th Judicial District Court

of Pecos County, Texas 

(TC# 3156)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
12

Table 4. Employment status by marital status and sex, 2010 annual averages

(Numbers in thousands)

 Civilian labor force 

 Employed Unemployed 

 Total 

 Percent 

of 

population 

 Total 

 Percent 

of labor 

force 

Total

Total, 16 years of age and over............. 237,830 153,889 64.7 139,064 58.5 14,825 9.6 83,941

 Married, spouse present........... 121,511 83,172 68.4 77,873 64.1 5,298 6.4 38,340

 Unmarried, total....................... 116,318 70,717 60.8 61,191 52.6 9,526 13.5 45,601

 Never married....................... 69,685 45,577 65.4 38,800 55.7 6,777 14.9 24,108

 Other marital status................. 46,633 25,140 53.9 22,391 48.0 2,749 10.9 21,493

 Divorced............................. 23,737 16,260 68.5 14,508 61.1 1,752 10.8 7,477

 Separated.......................... 8,589 5,886 68.5 5,145 59.9 741 12.6 2,703

 Widowed........................... 14,308 2,994 20.9 2,738 19.1 257 8.6 11,313

Women

Total, 16 years of age and over............. 122,656 71,904 58.6 65,705 53.6 6,199 8.6 50,752

 Married, spouse present........... 60,257 36,742 61.0 34,582 57.4 2,160 5.9 23,515

 Unmarried, total...................... 62,399 35,162 56.4 31,123 49.9 4,039 11.5 27,236

 Never married...................... 32,548 20,592 63.3 17,950 55.1 2,642 12.8 11,956

 Other marital status............... 29,851 14,570 48.8 13,173 44.1 1,397 9.6 15,280

 Divorced............................ 13,736 9,246 67.3 8,399 61.1 847 9.2 4,491

 Separated.......................... 4,730 3,045 64.4 2,671 56.5 374 12.3 1,685

 Widowed........................... 11,385 2,280 20.0 2,104 18.5 177 7.7 9,104

Men

Total, 16 years of age and over............. 115,174 81,985 71.2 73,359 63.7 8,626 10.5 33,189

 Married, spouse present........... 61,254 46,430 75.8 43,292 70.7 3,138 6.8 14,824

 Unmarried, total...................... 53,920 35,555 65.9 30,067 55.8 5,487 15.4 18,365

 Never married...................... 37,137 24,985 67.3 20,850 56.1 4,135 16.5 12,152

 Other marital status............... 16,783 10,570 63.0 9,217 54.9 1,352 12.8 6,213

 Divorced........................... 10,000 7,014 70.1 6,109 61.1 905 12.9 2,986

 Separated.......................... 3,859 2,842 73.6 2,475 64.1 367 12.9 1,018

 Widowed............................ 2,923 714 24.4 634 21.7 80 11.2 2,209

 SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Marital status and sex

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

 Not in 

labor 

force Total 

 Percent 

of 

population 

12
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 18 Filed 11/10/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 338
Case 3:11-cv-04194-PGS -DEA Document 18 Filed 11/10/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 339
- 1 - 

James E. Cecchi 

Lindsey H. Taylor 

Donald A. Ecklund 

Zachary S. Bower 

CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI 

 OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO 

5 Becker Farm Road 

Roseland, New Jersey 07068 

(973) 994-1700 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

IN RE: 

MEDCO/EXPRESS SCRIPTS MERGER 

LITIGATION 

Civil Action No. 11-4211(DMC)(MF) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that I caused copies of the following papers to be electronically filed today in the 

above captioned litigation and served via the Court’s ECF system upon all persons who have 

entered an appearance in this matter: 

 1. Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Final Approval of Class Action 

Settlement; 

 2. Certificate of Service. 

 CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, 

 OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: April 2, 2012 By: /s/ James E. Cecchi 

 JAMES E. CECCHI 

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 106-1 Filed 04/02/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 6170
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6328

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN ADAM MARTIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:02-cr-00868-GRA-1; 8:05-cv-01237-GRA) Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 26, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Adam Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: John Adams Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DESIGN CONCEPT ITALIA, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

WHITNEY R. DI BONA and GARRETT M. DI BONA, Jointly and 

Individually,

Appellees.

No. 2D23-1983

April 3, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Richard Martin, 

Judge.

David A. Townsend of Townsend & Brannon, Tampa, for Appellant.

Whitney Ray Di Bona of Maune Raichle Hartley French & Mudd, LLC, 

Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

ATKINSON, and SMITH, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR 

JUDGE, Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
# Summer Youth Labor Force

"The Summer Employment and Unemployment Among Youth release focuses on labor force activity of youth 16 to 24 years old.  The estimates in this release are based on April-July data from the Current Population Survey. Included in this release are youth labor force participation data by sex, race, and Hispanic ethnicity, as well as employment by industry.  Issued annually.  For more information, see www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm#youth."

- From April to July 2023, the number of employed youth rises by 1.4 million to 21.6 million
- From April to July 2022, the number of employed youth rises 2.1 million to 21.0 million
- Youth employment-population ratio at 54.4% in July 2021, up from 46.7% in July 2020
- Youth unemployment rate at 18.5% in July 2020, up from 9.1% last July
- Youth labor force participation rate at 61.8% in July 2019, up from 60.6% in July 2018
- From April to July 2018, the number of employed youth rises 2.0 million to 20.9 million
- Youth unemployment rate at 9.6% in July 2017, down from 11.5% last July
- From April to July 2016, the number of employed youth rises 1.9 million to 20.5 million
- From April to July 2015, the number of employed youth rises 2.1 million to 20.3 million
- From April to July 2014, the number of employed youth rose 2.1 million to 20.1 million
- From April to July 2013, the number of employed youth rose 2.1 million to 19.7 million
- From April to July 2012, the number of employed youth rose 2.1 million to 19.5 million