alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V.

I)ANIEL fyi. FISRESZ

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court as a result of the Court’s August 25. 2010 Order

requiring defendant DANiEL M. FURESZ (Steven E. Savage, Esq., counsel) to undergo a

competency evaluation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241. The Court having received and read the

October 26, 2010 Report of William J. Ryan. Ph.D., Forensic Psychologist, prepared pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 4247(c) and the Court having heard oral argument in open court from both the defendant

and the United States (Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the District ofNew Jersey, Aaron

Mendeisohn, Assistant United Stales Attorney) in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 4247(d); and fbr

good cause shown;

IT IS on this 22nd day of November 2010, ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant is currently competent to stand trial; however, since his mental health

condition may change, defendant shall continue to undergo observation and competency evaluations

by Dr. Ryan as Dr. Ryan deems necessary through the duration of trial;

2. Dr. Ryan shall apprise the Court of defendant’s competency in advance of February

21, 2011 (motion hearing), and February 28. 2011 (trial). In the event that Dr. Ryan requires

multiple sessions with deftndant. he must advise the Lnited States Attorney and other federal

authorities who, in turn. may redesignate detndani’s housing for better access:
6. A hearing on the motion(s) shall be on February 21. 2011, at 10:0() am.:7. Trial shall commence in this matter on February 28, 2011 at 10:00 am.: and

8. Trial briefs, voir dire questions, and jury charges shall be submitted to the Court by

February 21, 2011.

:(

PETER G. SHERIDAN. U.S.D.J.

November22, 2010
August 26, 2015

Hon. Jeffrey D. Kyle 

Clerk of the Court

Third Court of Appeals

Price Daniel, Sr. Building

209 West 14th Street, Rm 101

Austin, Texas 78701

RE: Appeal No. 03-14-00808-CV; Trial Court Cause No. 269,135-B; Rosendo Morales v. Texas 

Department of Insurance-Division of Workers’ Compensation and Commissioner Ryan Brannan, in 

his official capacity; In the Third Court of Appeals, Austin, Texas.

Dear Clerk: 

Please be advised that the undersigned counsel for Appellee will be out of town and 

unavailable from and including Friday, September 18, through and including Monday, 

September 28, 2015, as well as from and including Thursday, November 5, through and

including Thursday, November 19, 2015. I respectfully request that no hearings or deadlines 

be scheduled during that period. 

Thank you for your attention, and please advise if you have any questions.

Very truly yours, 

/s/ Adrienne Butcher 

Adrienne Butcher

Assistant Attorney General

Administrative Law Division

Telephone: (512) 463-1410

Facsimile: (512) 320-0167

Attorney for Appellee

cc: Bradley Dean McClellan, via email to Brad.McClellan@yahoo.com

Post Of fice Box 12548, Austin, Texas 7 8 7 1 1 - 2 5 4 8 • ( 5 1 2 ) 4 6 3 - 2 1 0 0 • www.texasattor neygeneral.gov 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00808-CV

6658929

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

8/26/2015 11:51:15 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/26/2015 11:51:15 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
T hi s app eal was t r ansf er r ed t o t hi s C our tf r om t he Fi ft h Cour tof Ap pe al s b y o rde rof t he T exas 1 S u p re m e C o u rt. See T EX
. G OV ' T C OD E A NN . § 2 2 .2 2 0 (V e rn o n 2 0 0 4 ) (d e l i n e a ti n g th e ju ris d i c ti o n o f a p p e l l a te c o u rts ); T EX
. G OV ' T C OD E A NN
. § 73. 001 ( Ver non 2005) ( gr ant i ng t he supr em e cour t t he a ut hor i t yt o t r ansf er c a s e s fro m o n e c o u rt o f a p p e a l s to a n o th e r a t a n yti m e th a t t h e re i s “g o o d c a u s e ” fo r th e tra n s fe r)

. 

### NUM BER 13-0 8-00 260- CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E XAS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ M ICH A ELA LA N GA RD NER , A pp ellan t,
v . TH E STA

TE OF T EXAS, A pp ellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On A p p ea l fro m th e C o u n ty C o u rta t L awN o . 3 of C ollin C ou nty , T exas . 1



### ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ M EM ORA ND UM OPIN ION Be fo re Ju stice s Yan ez, R od rigu ez an d Vela M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t, Mi chael Al an Gardner , by and throug h his attor ney , has filed a mot ion to dis mis s h isappeal bec ause he no lon gerd e sir e s to prosec ute i t. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 2( a)

. W i th ou t pa s s i ng on th e me r i ts of th e c as e, we g ran t th e mo ti on to dism iss2

pursuantto Tex as Rul e of Appel lat e Procedu re 42.2 (a ) and di smi ssthe appeal. Ha v ing dis mis sed the appeal at appel lan t' s re q uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be e n te rt ain ed, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h. PERC UR IAM
Do not p ubl is h. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47 .2(b). Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 25t h day

of Aug ust , 200 8.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd.

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd. (the “Company) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lloyd Hoffman, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o (d));and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | November 10, 2003 |                     | BY: | /s/Lloyd  Hoffman |
|--------|-------------------|--------------------------|-----|-------------------|
|   |              | LLOYD  HOFFMAN           |
|   |              | CHIEF  FINANCIAL OFFICER |

 

1

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 6, 2019

No. 04-19-00231-CR

Patrick Thomas CHILDERS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. A17313

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is hereby GRANTED. 

The appellant’s reply brief is due on December 30, 2019.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 17, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00611

- CV

United Central Control, Inc., Appellant

v.

Duncan & Boyd Jewelers of Austin, LLC; Valley Forge Ins. Co. as Subrogee of D&B;

and Hanover Insura nce Co., Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, RO SE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS DAY came on to be submitted to this Court appellant’ s motion to dismiss the appeal in the

above cause, and the Court having fully considered said motion, and being of the opinion that

same should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that said

motion is granted, and that the appeal is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant

p ay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision

be certified below for observance.
0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Chart 1-15. Consumer prices usually increase more slowly 

than private employers' compensation costs

Percent change from previous year

Consumer Price Index

Employment Cost Index

NOTE: The Employment Cost Index is for private-sector workers. Beginning in 2001, data reflect NAICS-based classification of 

industries. The Consumer Price Index is the CPI-U-RS research series as of April 2007. 

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 1-15. Consumer prices usually increase more slowly 

than private employers' compensation costs

• The Employment Cost Index (ECI) measures the costs to employers of both 

employee wages and benefits, and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures 

the average change in prices paid by consumers for a variety of goods and 

services. 

• Changes in the ECI and the CPI have tracked fairly closely over time, though 

increases in the CPI tend to be smaller than those for the ECI. 

• In 2005 and 2006, however, increases in consumer prices exceeded growth in 

private employers' compensation costs.
[No. 31978-1-II.

Division Two.

December 13, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. John David Everett, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 04-1-00418-9, John A. McCarthy and Brian M. Tollefson, JJ., entered July 9, 2004. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Armstrong and Penoyar, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**

I, Michael J. Mugan,certify that:

1.                                      Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hostopia.com Inc.;

2.                                      Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                                      Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                                      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:

a)          designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)         evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)          disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                                      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand  report financial information; and

b)   any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
|  Date: February 13, 2007 |   | /s/ MICHAEL J. MUGAN    |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                          |   | Michael J. Mugan        |
|                          |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Paul A. SCHILLECI, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 2012-3188.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 8, 2013.

David Gespass, Gespass & Johnson, of Birmingham, AL, argued for petitioner.

Kenneth M. Dintzer, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. On the brief were Stuart F. Delery, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director, and Tara K. Hogan, Trial Attorney.

PROST, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**Microtune, Inc.**

**List of Subsidiariesand Affiliates**

 

**Wholly-owned subsidiaries:**

Microtune (LP), L.L.C. 

Microtune (GP), L.L.C. 

Microtune (San Diego), Inc. f/k/a Transilica Inc. 

 

**Indirectly-owned subsidiaries:**

Microtune (Texas), L.P. 

HMTF Acquisition (Bermuda), Ltd. 

Microtune GmbH & Co. KG 

HMTF Erste Beteiligungs GmbH 

Microtune Verwaltungs GmbH 

Microtune RF Technologies (Phils), Inc. 

NSF-Technologies (Phils.), Inc.f/k/a NSF RF Technologies Corporation 

Microtune (Taiwan), Ltd. 

Microtune (Korea), Ltd. 

Microtune (Hong Kong), Ltd. 

Microtune (Japan), Inc. f/k/a Transilica Japan Inc.
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 8 Filed 10/04/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 20
Case 2:11-cr-00405-KSH Document 8 Filed 10/04/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 21
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5379 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5379

  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit the timing of 
              issuance of H-2B visas during a fiscal year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2004

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit the timing of 
              issuance of H-2B visas during a fiscal year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON TIMING OF ISSUANCE OF H-2B VISAS DURING A 
              FISCAL YEAR.

    (a) In General.--Section 214(g)(1)(B) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting before 
the period at the end the following: ``, and may not exceed one-third 
of such number during the first 4 months of any fiscal year and two-
third of such number during the first 8 months of any fiscal year''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply beginning with fiscal year 2005.
                                 <all>
```
# Occupational Employment and Wages

"The Occupational Pay Comparisons Among Metropolitan Areas release presents pay relative data for metropolitan areas.  A pay relative, a means of assessing pay differences, is a calculation of pay for a given metropolitan area, relative to the nation as a whole.  Pay relatives are available for each of the nine occupational groups within the surveyed metropolitan areas, as well as averaged across all occupations for each area.  Annual.  For more information, see www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/. "

- Office and administrative support occupations have mean wage of $47,940 in May 2023
- Computer and mathematical occupations have a mean wage of $108,130 in May 2022
- Healthcare practitioners and technical occupations have 8.8 million jobs in May 2021
- Healthcare support occupations mean wage is $32,250 in May 2020
- Mean wage for installation, maintenance, and repair occupations is $50,130 in May 2019
- Transportation and material moving occupations represent 7.1% of employment in May 2018
- Employment in production occupations is 9 million in May 2017, 6.3% of all employment
- Construction and extraction occupations represent 4% of employment in May 2016
- Healthcare occupations represent 9% of employment in May 2015
- Registered nurses is largest occupation with an above-average wage ($69,790) in May 2014
- Retail salespersons and cashiers are the largest occupations in the U.S.
- Computer network support specialists is the largest newly defined occupation at 167,980
S05A1508.

#### THOMPSON v. TELFAIR.

(622 SE2d 355)

SEARS, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Warden Dannie Thompson, appeals from the habeas court’s grant of relief to the appellee, Harry Telfair. Warden Thompson contends that the habeas court erred in granting relief without holding an evidentiary hearing. For the reasons that follow, we agree.

The habeas court ordered Warden Thompson to produce Telfair for an evidentiary hearing scheduled for April 20, 2005.1 Because the warden did not have Telfair present at the start of the hearing, the habeas court refused to hold an evidentiary hearing and entered an order granting Telfair relief. This Court, however, has repeatedly held that a warden is entitled to the benefit of an evidentiary hearing before a habeas court may grant relief.2 Moreover, in a situation similar to the present case, we have held that the failure of a warden “to reply to a writ requiring him to answer within a stated time may subject the [warden] to punishment for contempt,” but that it does not permit the trial court to order the release of the petitioner.3

Accordingly, in the present case, we conclude that the habeas court had the authority to punish the warden for contempt for failing *24to have Telfair present at the start of the hearing, but that it did not have the authority to grant Telfair relief without holding an eviden-tiary hearing.

Decided November 21, 2005.

*Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Julie A. Adams, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellant.

*Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams, Margaret Sigman Puccini,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 See OCGA § 9-14-46 (It is the duty of the Department of Corrections, or other authority having custody of a petitioner, to produce the petitioner for hearings as directed by the trial court.).

2

*State v. Colack,*276 Ga. 396 (578 SE2d 893) (2003); *Gearinger v. Taylor,*268 Ga. 73 (487 SE2d 600) (1997); *Gaither v. Gibby,*267 Ga. 96, 97 (475 SE2d 603) (1996).

3

*McLeod v. Barrett,*271 Ga. 569, 571 (522 SE2d 219) (1999); *Huddleston v. Ricketts,*233 Ga. 112 (210 SE2d 319) (1974).
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of JCP&L Transition Funding LLC ("Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Earl T. Carey,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the  Report fairly  presents, in  all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                                                    /s/Earl T. Carey
                                                 ----------------------
                                                       Earl T. Carey
                                                         President
                                                 (Chief Executive Officer)
                                                       March 24, 2003


<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of JCP&L Transition Funding LLC ("Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Richard H. Marsh,
Senior Vice  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                                                   /s/Richard H. Marsh
                                                 --------------------------
                                                      Richard H. Marsh
                                                 Senior Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                       March 24, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of AlumiFuel Power Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Henry Fong, President & Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.  /s/ Henry FongHenry FongPrincipal Executive Officerand Principal Financial OfficerApril 15, 2011 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AlumiFuel Power Corporation and will be retained by AlumiFuel Power Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.