alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A “blue warrant” issues for the arrest of a parolee suspected of violating the terms 1

of his or her parole. See Franklin v. Kyle, 899 S.W.2d 405, 406 n.1 (Tex.App.–Waco 1995,

no pet.); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 508.251 & 508.252 (Vernon 2004).

See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 508.283(c) (Vernon 2004). This provision is 2

commonly known as the “‘street-time credit statute,’” because it specifies the conditions by

which an inmate may receive credit for time served while released on parole or mandatory

supervision. Ex parte Noyola, 215 S.W.3d 862, 864-65 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). 

NO. 07-08-0216-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JUNE 4, 2008

______________________________

IN RE VINCENT FRIEMEL

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Pending before the Court is the petition filed by relator Vincent Friemel, seeking a

writ of habeas corpus compelling his immediate release from the Moore County jail. His

petition states he has been held there on a “blue warrant” since February 7, 2008, without 1

a preliminary hearing. His petition further contends he should be released because, by

calculating time served, time credited and “street-time” he has served his full sentence of 2

incarceration in the institutional division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for
2

felony driving while intoxicated. We will dismiss his petition for writ of habeas corpus for

want of jurisdiction. 

Where, as here, an order of restraint arises in a criminal proceeding we are not

empowered to act on a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Layton, 928 S.W.2d

781, 782 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1996, orig. proceeding) (citing Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221

(Vernon Supp. 1996)) (jurisdiction of court of appeals to issue writ of habeas corpus is

limited to petitioner seeking release from restraint imposed for violation or enforcement of

previous order in a civil case). Rather, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive

jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. Board of Pardons

and Paroles ex. rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483

(Tex.Crim.App.1995); In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196 (Tex.App.–Houston [14th Dist.]

2006, orig. proceeding) (stating that courts of appeal have no jurisdiction over postconviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art 11.07

§ 3 (Vernon Supp. 2007). 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

James T. Campbell 

 Justice
54 West 21st Street, Suite 1007

New York, New York 10010

tel: 646.419.4264 fax: 866.844.8305

Samantha H. Lutzer

Attorney at Law

646.374.0352

sam@bowlescrow.com

david@bowlescohn.com

www.bowlescrow.com New York

Los Angeles

March 1, 2012

Filed by ECF

The Hon. Patty Shwartz

United States District Judge

USDC, District of New Jersey

Martin Luther King Courthouse

50 Walnut Street Room PO10

Newark, NJ 07101

Re: K-Beech, Inc. v. Richard Booth, et al. Case No. 2:11-04776 (FSH)(PS)

 Patrick Collins Inc. v. Jeffrey Hitchcock, et al. Case No. 2:11-04203 

 (FSH)(PS)

 Notice of Voluntary Withdrawal and Request to Close Case and Cancel 

Conference

Dear Judge Shwartz:

I have advised my clients of your February 27, 2012 Order requesting their appearance in Court 

on Monday to address my firm’s withdrawal motion. For administrative reasons, they have decided to 

withdraw the actions at this time, and I have filed Notices of Voluntary Withdrawal. For these reasons, 

we respectfully request that the cases be closed and the conference for Monday be cancelled.

Yours very truly, 

___/s/ Samantha H. Lutzer________________________

Samantha H. Lutzer (SE0898)

cc: Jeff Hitchcock

Mary Kline

Floyd G. Remley

Case 2:11-cv-04203-FSH-PS Document 46 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 412
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 563 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 563

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain formulated silver paints and 
       pastes to coat tantalum anodes colloidal precious metals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain formulated silver paints and 
       pastes to coat tantalum anodes colloidal precious metals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SILVER PAINTS AND PASTES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.28.43    P6100-52% silver  Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     Ag Paint; P7400-                                                        31/2005          ''
                     52.8% silver AG                                                                           .
                     Paint; P7402-
                     61.6% silver Ag
                     Paste; and
                     P7500-52.8%
                     silver Ag Paint
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     2843.10.00)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:11-cr-00554-KSH Document 58 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 191
Case 2:11-cr-00554-KSH Document 58 Filed 09/04/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 192
Exhibit 10.14.5

 



	
Date:
    	
 
    	
May 3, 2012
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
To:
    	
 
    	
Management Metric Based Bonus (MBB)   Participants
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
From:
    	
 
    	
Jim Lejeal
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Regarding:
    	
 
    	
Q1 & Q2 FY13 MBB Structure and Goal
    


 

For FY13, we are implementing a slight change to the MBB program.  Instead of paying against quarterly total product bookings performance like we have in past quarters, we will now pay against total product bookings performance measured for the 1st half of the year.

 

We believe this change better aligns the company with performance metrics and objectives outlined in our 1H FY13 operating plan approved by our Board of Directors.

 

Rally will still pay the MBB on a quarterly basis using the following guidelines:

 

·                  The Q1 MBB payment will be paid to participants at 100% of performance provided that the company exceeds 85% of new product bookings quota amount for Q1.

·                  The Q2 MBB payment will be paid to participants according to the company’s performance against the total product bookings quota amount for the first 6 months of the fiscal year.

·                  The Company must achieve 90% of the 1H new product bookings for the Q2 portion of the MBB to be paid.

 

The intent is to align MBB participants with the sales team’s bookings objectives for the 1H period.

 

Quota amounts for Q2 are not determined until mid-month of the first month of the quarter (May ’12) so as a result the final MBB target numbers for Q2 will be communicated as soon as possible at the Monday morning management meeting.

 

Payment Conditions:

 

We will have a new bookings threshold for Q1 and Q2 of 85% and 90%, respectively.

 

Further, a total payment cap will be set at 125%.

 

A “true-up” will take place on the Q2 payment.

 

·                  For example, if the Company performs to 115% of product bookings for 1H 2013 and 100% was paid for Q1 the additional 15% due on Q1 will be paid with the Q2 payment.

 

Note that in the unlikely event the 90% of 1H 2013 bookings is not attained the Q1 bonus will be deemed earned based on achieving the 85% milestone for Q1.

 

Anticipated Payout Date:

 

It is anticipated Rally will pay Q1 on May 15th, 2012 and Q2 on August 31st, 2012.
38

20

35

1

6

32

13

17 19 18

0

10

20

30

40

50

Management,

professional, and

related occupations

Service occupations Sales and office

occupations

Natural resources,

construction, and

maintenance

occupations

Production,

transportation, and

material moving

occupations

Women Men

Chart 5-7. Fewer than 1 in 10 women were employed in 

construction and maintenance occupations or production and 

transportation occupations in 2005

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Percent distribution of employed women and men by occupation

2005

Chart 5-7. Fewer than 1 in 10 women were employed in 

construction and maintenance occupations or production and 

transportation occupations in 2005

• Women were concentrated in management, professional, and related

occupations, service occupations, and sales and office occupations. 

• Fewer than 1 in 10 women were employed in natural resources, construction, 

and maintenance occupations or production, transportation, and material 

moving occupations.
85

Table 30. Labor force status of 2010 high school graduates and 2009–10 high school dropouts 

16 to 24 years old by school enrollment and sex, October 2010

(Numbers in thousands)

Total, 2010 high school graduates1.............3,160 1,633 51.7 1,179 37.3 454 27.8 1,528

 Women.................................................. 1,482 706 47.7 520 35.1 187 26.4 775

 Men.......................................................1,679 926 55.2 659 39.3 267 28.9 752

 Enrolled in college..................................... 2,152 860 40.0 664 30.9 196 22.8 1,292

Percent of total 2010 graduates..................................... 68.1 52.7 - 56.3 - 43.2 - 84.6

Women................................................. 1,097 427 38.9 347 31.6 80 18.7 670

Percent of female 2010 graduates..................................... 74.0 60.5 - 66.7 - 42.8 - 86.5

Men.....................................................1,055 433 41.1 317 30.1 116 26.8 621

Percent of male 2010 graduates..................................... 62.8 46.8 - 48.1 - 43.4 - 82.6

 Not enrolled in college................................1,009 773 76.6 515 51.0 258 33.4 236

Percent of total 2010 graduates..................................... 31.9 47.3 - 43.7 - 56.8 - 15.4

 Women.................................................385 280 72.7 173 45.0 107 38.2 105

Percent of female 2010 graduates..................................... 26.0 39.7 - 33.3 - 57.2 - 13.5

 Men.....................................................624 493 79.0 342 54.8 151 30.7 131

Percent of male 2010 graduates..................................... 37.2 53.2 - 51.9 - 56.6 - 17.4

Total, 2009–10 high school dropouts2................ 340 183 53.9 105 30.9 78 42.7 157

 Women.................................................161 106 66.0 59 36.4 48 44.8 55

 Men.....................................................179 77 43.1 47 25.9 31 39.8 102

Characteristic

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

 Civilian labor force 

 Not in 

labor 

Total force 

Percent 

of 

population 

 Employed Unemployed 

 Total 

Percent 

of 

population 

Total

Percent 

of labor 

force

 1 Data refer to persons who graduated from high school in January through October 2010. 2 Data refer to persons who dropped out of school between October 2009 and October 2010. 3 Data not shown where base is less than 75,000. 

 

 NOTE: Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not equal totals. 

 SOURCE: October 2010 School Enrollment Supplement to the Current Population Survey, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

85
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kinder Travel, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel L. Baxter,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                August 14, 2007
            
            /s/ 
                Daniel L. BaxterDaniel
                L. Baxter
              Principal
                Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [EG09-37-000]

      ( print page 36190)    
Take notice that during the month of June 2009, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations 18 CFR 366.7(a).

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-17337 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Table 37. Employment status of persons with disabilities by sex and age, 

2009 annual averages

(Numbers in thousands)

Total, 16 years of age and over

Civilian noninstitutional population................................. 26,981 14,797 12,184

 Civilian labor force................................................... 6,050 2,829 3,221

 Participation rate...................................................... 22.4 19.1 26.4

 Employed............................................................ 5,174 2,439 2,735

 Employment-population ratio................................. 19.2 16.5 22.4

 Unemployed......................................................... 876 390 486

 Unemployment rate............................................. 14.5 13.8 15.1

 Not in labor force...................................................... 20,931 11,968 8,963

16 to 64 years of age

Civilian noninstitutional population................................. 14,845 7,611 7,234

 Civilian labor force................................................... 5,220 2,475 2,745

 Participation rate...................................................... 35.2 32.5 37.9

 Employed............................................................ 4,406 2,112 2,294

 Employment-population ratio................................. 29.7 27.7 31.7

 Unemployed......................................................... 814 364 451

 Unemployment rate............................................. 15.6 14.7 16.4

N ti l b f 9 625 5 136 4 489

Employment status and age Total Women Men

 Not in labor force...................................................... 9,625 5,136 4,489

65 years of age and over

Civilian noninstitutional population................................. 12,136 7,185 4,950

 Civilian labor force................................................... 830 353 476

 Participation rate...................................................... 6.8 4.9 9.6

 Employed............................................................ 768 327 441

 Employment-population ratio................................. 6.3 4.6 8.9

 Unemployed......................................................... 61 26 35

 Unemployment rate............................................. 7.4 7.3 7.4

 Not in labor force...................................................... 11,306 6,832 4,474

NOTE: A person with a disability has at least one of the following conditions: deaf or serious difficulty

hearing; blind or serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses; serious difficulty concentrating,

remembering, or making decisions because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition; serious

difficulty walking or climbing stairs; difficulty dressing or bathing; or difficulty doing errands alone such as

visiting a doctor's office or shopping because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

95
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-2066

___________ Song Cha Flannery; James Flannery; * Patricia J. Young; Keya Young; Keicha * Slayton; Kevin Slayton, * * Appellees, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Dennis Hyde, Chief of Police Paragould * [UNPUBLISHED] Police Department; Carlon Chipman; * Larry Bennett; Scott Chamberlain; City * of Paragould, Arkansas, * * Appellants. *

___________ Submitted: January 10, 2000 Filed: January 19, 2000

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Song Cha Flannery, James Flannery, Patricia J. Young, Keja Young, Keicha Slayton, and Kevin Slayton brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action asserting violations of their Fourth Amendment rights after Paragould police officers Carlon Chipman, Larry Bennett, and Scott Chamberlain searched their homes in the middle of the night-2-

without a warrant. Although the plaintiffs consented to the searches, they claim they didnot consent voluntarily. The defendants moved for summary judgment asserting they are entitled to qualified immunity. The district court denied the motion, concluding the individual defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law because the reasonableness of the searches turned on the voluntariness of consent, which the parties disputed. The court also found a genuine issue of material fact about whether the City of Paragould had a custom or policy of violating plaintiffs' rights. On appeal, the appellants challenge the plaintiffs' version of the facts as stated in their affidavits and contend the affidavits do not create a material issue of fact for trial. Our limited jurisdiction to review the denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity does not extend to this evidentiary issue, however. See Johnsonv. Jones , 515 U.S. 304, 307, 313 (1995); McCaslin v. Wilkins , 183 F.3d 775, 778 (8th Cir. 1999)

. The appellants also make legal arguments based on the factual assumption that the plaintiffs voluntarily consented to the searches. Without resolving the evidentiary issue, we cannot reach the legal ones. We thus dismiss the appeal. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
d1364174_ex4-10.htm


Exhibit 4.10







ADDENDUM No. 3


to


the Management Agreement dated 12/05/2011 and any addenda thereto


(the "Management Agreement")







Between


ARAL SEA SHIPPING S.A.


of Liberia


(as Owner)







And







ALLSEAS MARINE S.A.


of Liberia







(as Manager)







In respect of the management of the Vessel MAERSK DIADEMA (the "Vessel")







Notwithstanding the relevant provisions of the Management Agreement, it is this, 18th day of September 2012, mutually agreed between the Owner and the Manager that a clause 8.05 shall be added to read as follows:







"Unless the agreement is terminated by the Owner in accordance with Clauses 12.03 (iii) and (iv) of this Agreement or by reason of default by gross negligence or misconduct of Manager, its Directors, officers and/or employees in the performance under this Agreement, upon termination of this Agreement in relation to the Vessel, the Management Fee will be continued at the above rate then in effect for 90 days from the date of termination. This is to cover operating and accounting cost of finalizing the Vessels' disbursements, demurrage, etc. In addition, the Owner shall continue to pay the following:








	
  

	
i)

	
Crew support costs for a further period of three calendar months








	
  

	
ii)

	
An equitable proportion of any management staff redundancy costs which may materialize.












Notwithstanding the above, in the event that the Management Agreement is terminated in accordance with Clause 12.05, then the provisions of the Compensation Agreement between the Manager and Box Ships Inc. dated 12/09/2012, copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, forming an integral part of this Agreement, or any renewal thereof shall be applied."







All other fees, terms, conditions and provisions of the Management Agreement remain unaltered and in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have signed this Addendum this 18th day of September, 2012.



	
 

	
 


	
FOR THE OWNER

	
FOR THE MANAGER


	
 

	
 


	
/s/ Maria Stefanou

	
/s/  George Skrimizeas


	
MARIA STEFANOU

	
GEORGE SKRIMIZEAS


	
Attorney-in-fact

	
Attorney-in-fact
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matritech, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the SEC on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Sandberg, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Matritech, Inc. and will be retained by Matritech, Inc. and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

/s/ Richard A. Sandberg

Richard A. Sandberg
Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2004