alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      8**

**List      of Subsidiaries**

| Active                Subsidiaries                               |                     |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Subs                Name                                         | Country                  |
| Tadipol-ECI                Sp.z.o.o                              | Poland                   |
| Alvarion                SARL                                     | France                   |
| Alvarion                De Mexico SA                             | Mexico                   |
| Alvarion                Inc                                      | USA                      |
| Alvarion                UK Ltd.                                  | UK                       |
| Alvarion                Srl                                      | Romania                  |
| Alvarion                Asia Pacific Ltd.                        | Hong                Kong |
| Alvarion                Do Brasil LTDA                           | Brasil                   |
| Alvarion                Japan KK                                 | Japan                    |
| Alvarion                Telsiz Sistemleri A.S.                   | Turkey                   |
| Alvarion                Israel (2003) Ltd.                       | Israel                   |
| Alvarion                Mobile Inc.                              | USA                      |
| Interwave                Communications Inc.                     | USA                      |
| Interwave                Communications Ireland Limited          | Ireland                  |
| Interwave                Communications International SA         | France                   |
| Interwave                Communications (Shenzen) Co., Ltd~~.~~. | China                    |
| Alvarion                Spain SL                                 | Spain                    |
| International                Wave Communications Netowrks Inc.   | Philippines              |
| Alvarion                Uruguay SA                               | Uruguay                  |
| Alvarion                PTE LTD                                  | Singapore                |

----
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE
      15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of Internal Hydro International, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lior
      Segal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
      May
      18, 2006.     /s/ *Lior
      Segal*


Lior
      Segal,


Chief
      Financial
      Officer of


Internal
      Hydro
      International, Inc.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



CERTIFICATION



I, Roger Dunfield, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016of SMTC Corporation;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: April 29, 2016



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Roger Dunfield     
|Roger Dunfield         
|                       
|Chief Financial Officer
1

The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for

the District of Nebraska, adopting the report and recommendation of

the Honorable Thomas D. Thalken, United States Magistrate Judge for

the District of Nebraska.

___________

No. 95-3081

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * District of Nebraska.

Eric V. Miller, *

 * [TO BE PUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: December 20, 1995

 Filed: January 19, 1996 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, MAGILL, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Eric V. Miller challenges his conviction under 18 U.S.C.A.

§ 922(u) (West Supp. 1995) for stealing firearms previously

transported in interstate commerce, entered upon his conditional

guilty plea. For reversal, Miller asserts that the district court1

erred in rejecting his argument that section 922(u) violates the

Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Miller relies

on United States v. Lopez, 115 S. Ct. 1624 (1995) (concluding that

Congress exceeded its Commerce Clause authority in enacting GunFree School Zones Act of 1990, 18 U.S.C. § 922(q)). Miller also

maintains that section 922(u) is inconsistent with its legislative

history. We affirm.
-2-

Section 922(u) provides:

It shall be unlawful for a person to steal or

unlawfully take or carry away from the person

or the premises of a person who is licensed to

engage in the business of importing,

manufacturing, or dealing in firearms, any

firearm in the licensee's business inventory

that has been shipped or transported in

interstate or foreign commerce.

 

Reviewing the constitutionality of section 922(u) de novo, see

United States v. McMurray, 34 F.3d 1405, 1413 (8th Cir. 1994),

cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1164 (1995), we agree with the district

court that Miller's Lopez challenge fails. In United States v.

Shelton, 66 F.3d 991, 992 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam), we upheld

18 U.S.C. § 922(g) against a Lopez challenge. We held that,

because the language of section 922(g) contained an interstateelement requirement, the statute ensured through case-by-case

inquiry that the firearm in question affected interstate commerce.

Id.; see also United States v. Rankin, 64 F.3d 338, 339 (8th Cir.

(per curiam) (holding § 922(g)(1) clearly tied to interstate

commerce), cert denied, 64 U.S.L.W. 3397 (U.S. Dec. 4, 1995) (No.

95-6563). Like section 922(g), the plain language of section

922(u) contains an interstate-commerce nexus as an essential

element of the offense and thus ensures that the firearm in

question affects interstate commerce. In view of the plain

language of section 922(u), we agree with the district court that

it is not necessary to refer to legislative history. See Hunger v.

AB; CD; EF; GH, 12 F.3d 118, 121 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.

Ct. 2676 (1994).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 15127 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:03

- cr - 00123

- WS

- M

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus CLIFTON LASHAWN FRAZIER, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________ (June 19, 2014) Before TJOFLAT , PRYOR and MARTIN , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Kristen Gartman Rogers , appointed coun sel for Clifton Lashawn Frazier in this appeal , has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

Case: 13-15127 Date Filed: 06/19/2014 Page: 1 of 22 has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Frazier has filed a pro se response. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdra w is GRANTED , and the judgment revoking Frazier ’s supervised release and his resulting sentence are AFFIRMED

. Case: 13-15127 Date Filed: 06/19/2014 Page: 2 of 2
# International Comparisons of Manufacturing Productivity and Unit Labor Cost Trends

"The International Comparisons of Productivity and Unit Labor Costs (PROD4) release compares across countries labor productivity and unit labor costs for the manufacturing sector. Labor productivity is output per hour worked. Unit labor costs is labor costs per unit of output. This release is issued once per year. For more information, visit the International Labor Comparisons home page at www.bls.gov/ilc/."

- Manufacturing productivity increased in 2011 in 15 of 19 countries covered
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 788 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 788

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To revise the boundary of the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in 
                    the States of Utah and Arizona.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 788

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To revise the boundary of the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in 
                    the States of Utah and Arizona.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 
Boundary Revision Act''.

SEC. 2. GLEN CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA BOUNDARY REVISION.

    (a) In General.--The first section of Public Law 92-593 (16 U.S.C. 
460dd; 86 Stat. 1311) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``That in'' and inserting ``Section 1. (a) 
        In''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) In addition to the boundary change authority under subsection 
(a), the Secretary may acquire approximately 152 acres of private land 
in exchange for approximately 370 acres of land within the boundary of 
Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, as generally depicted on the map 
entitled `Page One Land Exchange Proposal', number 608/60573a-2002, and 
dated May 16, 2002. The map shall be on file and available for public 
inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service. 
Upon conclusion of the exchange, the boundary of the recreation area 
shall be revised to reflect the exchange.''.
    (b) Change in Acreage Ceiling.--Such section is further amended by 
striking ``one million two hundred and thirty-six thousand eight 
hundred and eighty acres'' and inserting ``1,256,000 acres''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 25, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matritech, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the SEC on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Sandberg, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Matritech, Inc. and will be retained by Matritech, Inc. and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

/s/ Richard A. Sandberg
------------------------
Richard A. Sandberg
Chief Financial Officer
November 3, 2004
Agriculture Mining Construction Manufacturing Transportation and public utilities Wholesale and retail trade Finance, insurance, and real estate 

Total for industry (in thousands)............... 3,318 534 9,682 19,245 9,799 28,096 8,949 

Percent................................................... 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting......... 58.8 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.3 [ 1 ] Mining...................................................... [ 1 ] 80.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 [ 1 ] Construction............................................. 0.9 2.1 92.4 1.2 1.2 0.9 1.0 Manufacturing............................................. 0.7 6.0 1.3 86.2 1.0 3.5 0.3 Wholesale and retail trade........................... 1.9 4.7 1.2 2.7 1.4 65.2 0.5 Transportation and utilities........................... 0.3 2.3 0.9 0.5 67.1 0.7 0.2 Information................................................ [ 1 ] 0.1 0.4 4.6 19.0 0.5 0.2 Financial activities....................................... 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.5 93.2 Professional and business services............... 33.8 2.5 1.4 2.1 6.4 1.5 2.3 Education and health services........................ 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.6 0.6 0.9 Leisure and hospitality................................. 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 25.5 0.3 Other services.......................................... 2.3 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 Public administration.................................... 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.4 

1Value less than 0.05

NOTE: Estimates are based on three-year average employment (2000-2002).SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey.

Table 3. Distribution of employment from the 1990 to the 2002 Census Industrial Classification by major industry group

(Percent distribution)

2002 Industry Group

1990 Industry Group
WRITERS

LIBRARIANS

REPORTERS

Writers and authors

develop written content 

for various types of 

media.

Reporters, news 

analysts, and 

journalists keep 

the public updated 

about current events 

and noteworthy 

information.

www.bls.gov/k12

Librarians help people

find information and 

conduct research

for personal and 

professional use.

151,200

jobs in 2022; 

number of jobs 

projected for 2032

156,800

•

Median annual wage for 2022

$73,150

Careers in Reading

141,200

jobs in 2022; 

number of jobs 

projected for 2032

145,500

•

Median annual wage for 2022

$61,660

58,500

jobs in 2022; 

number of jobs 

projected for 2032

56,600

•

Median annual wage for 2022

$55,960
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |   |                                         |   |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: April 14, 2010 | By:    | /s/  George Ring                        |   |
|                 |   | George Ring                                  |   |
|                 |   | Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal |   |
|                 |   | Financial Officer                            |   |

----
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence R. Rutkowski,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Lawrence R. Rutkowski


Lawrence R. Rutkowski
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-108570, 333-111525 and 333-115832), on Form S-4 (File No. 333-32446) and on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-42598, 333-42596, and 333-42594) of Curis, Inc., of our report dated March 15, 2005 relating to the financialstatements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 15, 2005
Case 2:11-cv-02522-SDW-MCA Document 15 Filed 05/31/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 105
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                12, 2008 | /s/                Michael S. Smith          |   |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             | Michael                S. Smith              |   |
|                             | Chief                Executive Officer       |   |
|                             | (Principal                Executive Officer) |   |

----
# 2003-2017

Fatal occupational injuries incurred by construction laborers at road construction sites, 2003-2017 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries incurred by construction laborers at road construction sites, 2003-2017		

Fatal occupational injuries incurred by construction laborers at road construction sites, 2003-2017 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries incurred by construction laborers at road construction sites, 2003-2017		

Page &P
[No. 23281-6-III.

Division Three.

December 22, 2005.]

#### Glen Hult et al., *Respondents,*v. Robert Russell et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grant County, No. 03-2-00574-2, Evan E. Sperline, J., entered July 9, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Kato, C.J., and Sweeney, J.
# 18SUMM2_13

# image1.png
EXHIBIT 12.2


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dafna Gruber, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of
     Alvarion Ltd.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.


Date: February 9, 2006


                                        /s/ Dafna Gruber
                                        -------------------------
                                        Dafna Gruber
                                        Chief Financial Officer
# laucnty20

&8Page &P of &N
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7051

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARTIR VELASQUEZ ARAGON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-97-18-A, CA-99-879-AM)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 15, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martir Velasquez Aragon, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Mary Kelly,

Bryan Cunningham, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s judgment or order is marked as

“filed” on July 22, 1999, the district court’s records show that it

was entered on the docket sheet on July 21, 1999. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet

that we take as the effective date of the district court’s

decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.

1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Martir Velasquez Aragon seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). Aragon also seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Aragon, Nos. CR-97-18-A; CA-99-

879-AM (E.D. Va. July 1, 1999; July 22, 1999).* We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED