alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 570

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 5-year extension 

of the credit for electricity produced from wind. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. FOLEY (for himself, Mr. WELLER, Mr. MATSUI, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. RAMSTAD, 

Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. BECERRA, Mrs. 

JONES of Ohio, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. LEACH, Mrs. DAVIS

of California, Mr. PAUL, Mr. WU, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. ENGEL, 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. OTTER, Mrs. CAPPS, 

Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. 

GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mr. 

SHERMAN, Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. LUCAS

of Oklahoma, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. SIMMONS, 

Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. FROST, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, and Mr. 

MORAN of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a 5-year extension of the credit for electricity produced 

from wind.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 570 IH 

1 SECTION 1. 5-YEAR EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR ELEC2 TRICITY PRODUCED FROM WIND. 

3 Section 45(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

4 1986 (relating to wind facility) is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘2004’’ and inserting ‘‘2009’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of DirectView, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the six months ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Perry, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/Michael Perry
Michael Perry
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
August 3, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Nelson MADDUX, Defendant.

Cr. No. *2682.*

District Court, Alaska Third Division, Anchorage.

Dec. 28, 1956.

*170Lloyd L. Dugger, Asst. U. S. Atty., Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiff.

Paul F. Robison, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendant.

McCARREY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court upon a motion to modify the sentence by suspending it in part and placing the defendant on probation.

The defendant was found guilty, by a jury, for the crime of assault with intent to kill, 65-4-16, ACLA 1949, and was sentenced to serve five years on the 15th day of September, 1954. He is presently in the custody of the Attorney General of the United States of America serving time under this sentence.

Defendant’s motion is predicated upon Sess.Laws Alaska 1955, c. 195, which purports to give the District Courts of the Territory of Alaska the power to suspend and modify sentences imposed by these courts at any time within five years from the date of imposition of sentence.

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, by Congressional action, have been extended to the District Courts of Alaska.

Rule 54, of Fed.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A. provides as follows:

> “These rules apply to *all criminal proceedings*in the United States district courts, which include the District Court for the Territory of Alaska * * (Emphasis supplied.)

Rule 35 of the Fed.R.Crim.P. provides as follows:

> “The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time. The court may reduce a sentence within 60 days after the sentence is imposed, or within 60 days after receipt by the court of a mandate issued upon affirmance of the judgment or dismissal of the appeal, or within 60 days after receipt of an order of the Supreme Court denying an application for a writ of certiorari.”

This limitation is jurisdictional, and after the expiration of the time prescribed, the court is without power to modify the sentence for reasons other than illegality. United States ex rel. Quinn v. Hunter, 7 Cir., 1947, 162 F.2d 644; United States v. Martin, D.C.W.D.S.C.1948, 8 F.R.D. 89, affirmed 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 1003, certiorari denied 335 U.S. 872, 69 S.Ct. 161, 93 L.Ed. 416. Defendant’s motion certainly does not come within the limits established by Rule 35. The only remaining issue is whether the Territorial Legislature had the power to enlarge the time within which the modification could be made for Territorial offenses.

Section 9 of the Alaska Organic Act, 48 U.S.C.A. 77, provides that the legislative power of the Territorial Legislature extends to all rightful subjects of legislation,

> “ * * * not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States * * *."

Rule 54 applies the rules to all criminal proceedings without differentiation between territorial and federal violations.

 I am of the opinion that the 1955 act, supra, is clearly inconsistent with the procedural laws established through the power of Congress. Accordingly, I find that this court is without power to modify the sentence imposed upon the defendant and the motion is hereby denied.
exhibit10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 





 


 




  





Page - 1











  






 





 




  





Page - 2











  






 





 




  





Page - 3











  






 





 




  





Page - 4











  






 





 




  





Page - 5











  






 





 




  





Page - 6
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, August 5, 2009, 8 a.m. to August 6, 2009, 5 p.m., Marriott Bethesda North Hotel & Conference Center, Bethesda, MD which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 26, 2009, 74FR30592.                

This notice is to cancel the NCI-ARRA Grand Opportunities-Clinical/Translational Special Emphasis Panel that was to be held on August 5-6, 2009.

Dated: July 14, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-17207 Filed 7-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 1260

_____________________________
C OMCAST C ORPORATION and L IBERTY M UTUAL I NSURANCE C O ./H ELMSMAN M ANAGEMENT S ERVICES , LLC,

Appellant s ,

v.

B ERNARD S MALLS , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims. Edward R. Almeyda , Judge

.

Date of Accident: November 26, 2016.

December 27, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.

R OBERTS , R AY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Therese A. Savona and Neil Ambekar of Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Orlando
, for Appellant s

. William F. Souza of Law Offices of William F. Souza, P.A., North Miami Beach
, for Appellee.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: November 16, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Edward J. GildeaEdward J. GildeaChief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31

                        RULE 13a-14(a) Certification

I, Eduardo Rodriguez, certify that:

       1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Headliners
Entertainment Group, Inc.;

       2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


       3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
financial information included in this report fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;

       4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

       a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

       b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of ths disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

           Disclosed in this report any changes in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

       5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

       a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

       b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 4, 2006            /s/ Eduardo Rodriguez
                               ----------------------------------------------
                               Eduardo Rodriguez, Chief Executive Officer and
                               Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO THE

JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD :

:

: No. 765

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1 st day of May , 201 8

, t he Honorable Patricia H. Jenkins (retired)

,

Delaware County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Judicial Conduct Board for a

term of four years

, commencing August 16, 2018.
a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 13, 2010
    By:
    /s/ David R. AllenDavid R. AllenChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 691

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow corporations to 

claim a charitable deduction for the donation of services related to 

contributions of computer technology or equipment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2003

Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow corporations to claim a charitable deduction for the donation 

of services related to contributions of computer technology or equipment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHARITABLE DEDUCTION FOR DONATION OF 

4 COMPUTER SERVICES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 170(e)(6)(B) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified computer 

7 contribution) is amended by inserting before ‘‘but only’’ 
2

•HR 691 IH 

1 the following: ‘‘, or any services related to computer design 

2 or to computer technology or equipment,’’. 

3 (b) VALUE.—Section 170(e)(6)(B) of such Code is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following flush lan5 guage: 

6 ‘‘The value of such a contribution of services re7 lated to computer design or to computer tech8 nology or equipment shall be calculated at a 

9 rate not to exceed $65 an hour.’’. 

10 (c) DEFINITION.—Section 170(e)(6)(F) of such Code 

11 (relating to definitions) is amended by redesignating 

12 clause (ii) as clause (iii) and by inserting after clause (i) 

13 the following new clause: 

14 ‘‘(ii) SERVICES RELATED TO COM15 PUTER DESIGN OR TO COMPUTER TECH16 NOLOGY OR EQUIPMENT.—The term ‘serv17 ices related to computer design or to com18 puter technology or equipment’ includes 

19 the following: 

20 ‘‘(I) Preparation of artwork, il21 lustrations, layout, typesetting, or 

22 photo retouching for purposes of 

23 being printed or published in any me24 dium. 
3

•HR 691 IH 

1 ‘‘(II) Preparation of preflight or 

2 prepress services. 

3 ‘‘(III) Preparation of printing 

4 films. 

5 ‘‘(IV) Electronic scanning serv6 ices and color separations. 

7 ‘‘(V) Internet design services. 

8 ‘‘(VI) Multimedia preparation 

9 and design services. 

10 ‘‘(VII) Design services in the 

11 preparation of signs and banners. 

12 ‘‘(VIII) Network designing, in13 stallation, and support services. 

14 ‘‘(IX) Computer troubleshooting. 

15 ‘‘(X) Computer repair. 

16 ‘‘(XI) Computer training. 

17 ‘‘(XII) Computer programming 

18 and software design.’’. 

19 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall take effect with respect to taxable years 

21 beginning after December 31, 2002.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16701]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices


Date and Time:  Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 10:30 a.m. Wednesday, July 15, 
2009, 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items To Be Discussed: Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec.  
437g. Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec.  437g, Sec.  438(b), 
and Title 26, U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions 
or proceedings or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures 
or matters affecting a particular employee.


Date and Time:  Thursday, July 16, 2009, at 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status:  This meeting will be open to the public.

Items To Be Discussed: Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-13:  The Black Rock Group, by WiIIam J. 
McGinley, Esq. Report of the Audit Division on Edwards for President. 
Final Rule on Transfer of Motor Voter Regulations to the EAC. 
Presidential Debates Rulemaking Petitions--Suggested Disposition.

Proposed Rule of Agency Procedures:  Notice to Respondents in Non-
Complaint Generated Matters.

Proposed Rule of Agency Procedures:  Notice to Named Respondents of 
Additional Material Facts or Additional Potential Violations.

Proposed Rule of Agency Procedures:  Notice to Potential Respondents in 
Enforcement.

Proposed Rule of Agency Procedures:  Modification of Procedural Rules 
for Probable Cause Hearings.

    Management and Administrative Matters.
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at 
least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-16701 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report on Form 10-Q of Viad Corp for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30,
2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Viad Corp.
 Date: August 7, 2008
    
    By /s/ Ellen M. IngersollEllen M. IngersollChief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2559** 

DEBORAH S. COX , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. LOWE ’ S HOME CENTERS, LLC , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv - 00679

- MOC

- DCK )

Submitted : June 20, 2016 Decided: July 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Geraldine Sumter , FERGUSON , CHAMBER & SUMTER, P
. A ., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. James M . Powell , WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Blair L. Byrum, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RI CE, LLP, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Deborah S. Cox appeals the district court’s order granting Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC’s summary judgment motion on her age discrimination claims , brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29
U.S.C. A. §§ 621 to 634 ( West 2008 & Supp. 2015 ); and North Carolina’s Equal Employment Practices Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 143.422.1 to 143.422.3 ( 2015 )
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s judgment
. Cox v. Lowe’s Home Ctrs., LLC , No. 3:14

- cv - 00679

- MOC

- DCK ( W .D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2015 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED