alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Pay Freeze

# Memorandum for the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff

The United States is in a period of severe economic stress.  Too many Americans have lost their jobs, their homes, their health insurance, or a substantial part of their retirement savings, and many more feel uncertain about the future.

In these circumstances, Government must act forcefully and creatively to stimulate our economic recovery, investing in infrastructure, innovative energy technologies, and education.  It must act quickly to provide assistance to average Americans.

Many have accepted the call to serve in Government and to assist me in restoring a sound economy and in improving the lives of average Americans.  In this challenging economic period, it is only appropriate that senior officials on the White House staff forgo pay increases until further notice.

Accordingly, as a signal of our shared commitment to restoring the country's economic vitality and because of the serious economic conditions we are facing, I intend to freeze the salaries of senior members of the White House staff, to the extent permitted by law.  I direct you to report back to me within 30 days with recommendations for actions to implement this freeze.

This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by a party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

                    This memorandum shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. E9-1724

Billing code 3195-W9-P
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Other expenditures

Personal insurance and pensions

Entertainment

Health care

Transportation

Apparel and services

Housing

Food

Percent of total expenditures

Married couple with children

Married couple only

Single parent

Chart 6-8. Single-parent families allocated more of their 

expenditure dollar to basic items—food and housing—than 

did married-couple families in 2005

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Expenditure category

Chart 6-8. Single-parent families allocated more of their 

expenditure dollar to basic items—food and housing—than 

did married-couple families in 2005

• In addition to food and housing, single-parent families allocated a larger share 

of their expenditure dollar to apparel and services (about 6 percent) than did 

other family groups.

• Married couples spent more as a share of total spending on transportation 

(about 19 percent) than did single-parent families. 

• Each family group allocated roughly 5 cents of every expenditure dollar to 

entertainment.
**B F**  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0 5 74 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MALINDA CRAZYMULE ,

Defendant and Appellant.**ORDER** Upon consideration Appellee ’s motion for a 6 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including August 1 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Jim Rice Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 17 2023

05/17/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0574
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 27, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1310 Lower Tribunal No. 14-15885

________________ C.J., the Father, Appellant, vs. Department of Children and Families, et al.,

Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Angelica D. Zayas, Judge. Thomas Butler, P.A., and Thomas J. Butler, for appellant. Karla Perkins, for appellee Department of Children & Families; Twig, Trade & Tribunal, PLLC, and Morgan Lyle Weinstein (Fort Lauderdale), and Thomasina F. Moore (Tallahassee), for appellee Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office. Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 





 


March 5, 2013


Armada Oil Inc.


10777 Westheimer Rd.,


Suite 1100


Houston, TX 77042


 


Attn: Jim Cerna


 


RE: Amendment and Extension Purchase and Option Agreement Bear
Creek Prospect & Overland Trail Prospect Carbon County, Wyoming


 


Dear Mr. Cerna:


 


Whereas in a Letter Agreement dated February 7, 2012 and amended
September 25, 2012, and again amended January 10, 2013, TR Energy, Inc. (TR), and Armada Oil, Inc. (Armada) did enter into a Purchase
and Option Agreement covering certain lands in Carbon County, Wyoming; and whereas, both TR and Armada agree that certain terms
of the original agreement and all amendments need to be amended once again;


 


Now, therefore, both TR and Armada agree to the following terms:


 


1. Armada acknowledges that it has executed the option to pay
the $736,000 to TR for the Unit acreage. The Unit acreage shall remain as described in the original agreement. Armada shall pay
the first installment of $250,000 as described on or before April 15, 2013.


 


All other terms of the original and amended agreements remain
in place.


 


Regards,


 


W.L. Sudderth


Vice President of TR Energy, Inc.


 


Accepted this 5th day of March, 2013.


 


ARMADA OIL INC.


 


 


James J Cerna Jr.


CEO
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 572

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 

on capital losses applicable to individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. FOSSELLA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitation on capital losses applicable to individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON CAPITAL LOSSES 

4 APPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUALS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 1211(b) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limita7 tion on capital losses for taxpayers other than corpora8 tions) is amended by striking ‘‘$3,000 ($1,500’’ and in9 serting ‘‘$8,250 (1/2 such amount’’. 
2

•HR 572 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—Section 1211 of 

2 such Code (relating to limitation on capital losses) is 

3 amended by adding at the end the following new sub4 section: 

5 ‘‘(c) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable 

7 year beginning in a calendar year after 2003, the 

8 $8,250 amount contained in subsection (b)(1) shall 

9 be increased by an amount equal to—

10 ‘‘(A) such amount, multiplied by 

11 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter12 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar 

13 year in which the taxable year begins by sub14 stituting ‘calendar year 2002’ for ‘calendar year 

15 1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 

16 ‘‘(2) ROUNDING.—If any increase determined 

17 under paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $50, such 

18 increase shall be rounded to the next highest mul19 tiple of $50.’’. 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

22 December 31, 2002.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                                ADE CORPORATION
            STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED    NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                JANUARY 31,           JANUARY 31,
                                                                            --------------------  --------------------
                                                                              1998       1997       1998       1997
                                                                            ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                                 (UNAUDITED)           (UNAUDITED)

<S>                                                                         <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>

Net income................................................................  $   4,317  $   3,819  $   8,830  $   9,484
                                                                            ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                            ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Shares used in computation:
  a. Weighted average common stock outstanding used in computation of
   basic net income per share.............................................     11,096      8,516     10,184      8,470
  b. Dilutive effect of stock options outstanding:........................        351        355        445        366
                                                                            ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
  c. Shares used in computation of diluted net income per share...........     11,447      8,871      8,629      8,836
                                                                            ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                            ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Basic net income per share................................................  $    0.39  $    0.45  $    0.87  $    1.12
                                                                            ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                            ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Diluted net income per share..............................................  $    0.38  $    0.43  $    0.83  $    1.07
                                                                            ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                            ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
</TABLE>
 
                                       18
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe annual report of Click Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael W. Ferro, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company] and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Theforegoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not beconsidered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
| Date: March 31, 2006 | /s/ MICHAEL W. FERRO, JR. |
|----------------------|---------------------------|
|                 | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection  with the Annual Report of Bellacasa Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard  Gagne, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: January 15, 2005

| /s/ Richard Gagne                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Richard Gagne, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal        Executive Officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial        Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
RE: Case No. 15-0058

COA #: 12-14-00010-CV TC#

STYLE:MARY HALL

v. RALPH & KACOO'S OF LUFKIN, TEXAS, D/B/A GREAT

TEXAS FOODS CORP., D/B/A BRAZOS CATTLE

FILE

CO.

COPY

DATE: 1/22/2015

CV-00396-11-03

Today the Supreme Court of Texas granted the

motion for extension of time to file petition for

review under Tex. R. App. P. 53.7(f) in the aboveMS. CATHY S. LUSK

CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354

TYLER, TX 75702 

'
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Melissa Ladakis, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:5/14/07By:/s/Melissa LadakisMelissa LadakisSecretary, Treasurer and Director
# U.S. Import and Export Price Indexes

"U.S. Import and Export Price Indexes (XIMPIM) measure change in the prices of imported and exported nonmilitary goods traded between the United States and the rest of the world. Product groups covered account for nearly 100 percent of U.S. commodity imports and exports by value. Excluded are works of art and selected miscellaneous exports. This release is issued monthly. For more information, visit the U.S. Import and Export Price Indexes home page at www.bls.gov/mxp."

- U.S. import prices increase 0.9% in April; export prices rise 0.5%
- U.S. import prices increase 0.4% in March on higher fuel prices; export prices rise 0.3%
- U.S. import prices up 0.3% in February on higher nonfuel prices; export prices rise 0.8%
- U.S. import prices rise 0.8% in January on higher nonfuel prices; export prices up 0.8%
- U.S. import prices are unchanged in December; export prices down 0.9%
- U.S. import prices fall 0.4% in November on lower fuel prices; export prices down 0.9%
- U.S. import prices fall 0.8% in October on lower fuel prices; export prices down 1.1%
- U.S. import prices rise 0.1% in September on higher fuel prices; export prices up 0.7%
- U.S. import prices rise 0.5% in August on higher fuel prices; export prices advance 1.3%
- U.S. import prices rise 0.4% in July on higher fuel prices; export prices advance 0.7%
- U.S. import prices fall 0.2% in June on lower nonfuel prices; export prices decline 0.9%
- U.S. import prices decrease 0.6% in May on lower fuel prices; export prices fall 1.9%
#### In the Matter of Evelyn B., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Clinton County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Melinda E., Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 472]

Mugglin, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered November 25, 2005, which, inter alia, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to extend the placement of respondent’s child.

Family Court’s previous order of derivative neglect of respondent’s child was affirmed by this Court *(Matter of Evelyn B.,*30 AD3d 913 [2006]). Respondent’s current appeal is from Family Court’s subsequent order extending the foster care placement of the child. As that order expired May 10, 2006, this appeal is moot *(see Matter of Jolyssa EE.,*28 AD3d 824, 825 [2006]; *Matter of Senator NN.,*21 AD3d 1187, 1188 [2005]; *Matter of Marcel S.,*15 AD3d 808, 809 [2005]).

Peters, J.E, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Marcio C. CabreraMarcio C. CabreraMay 14, 2008
    Chief Financial Officer
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 05-50021

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

JOSE HUMBERTO CAMPA-FAVELA also known as, Carlos 

Fabela-DeLeon

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso

3:04-CR-1902-ALL-FM

---------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand to district court for resentencing in light of the Supreme

Court’s opinion in USA v. Booker and this court’s opinion in USA

v. Mares is GRANTED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s alternative unopposed

motion for extension of time for a period of fourteen (14) days

from the court’s denial of appellee’s motion to vacate and remand

is MOOT.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00774-CV

Xerox State and Local Solutions, Inc. and Ralston Russell, Appellants

v.

Stellargy Services, LLC, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-13-003404, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant

appellants’ motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: January 3, 2014