alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rountree *et al.,*commissioners, *v.*Durden.

Although the county authorities have no power to hire out or otherwise employ misdemeanor convicts save in legally organized chain-gangs and upon public works, yet where the county commissioners in fact hired such convicts to a private person who, as an individual, employed them in building bridges for the county at an agreed compensation, and a fund was realized therefrom, such fund was not subject to distribution among the officers of court under the provisions of the act of 1891, which limits the fund applicable to the payment of the fees of these officers to such compensation only as may be received from *counties*or *municipal corporations*for the labor of convicts hired to them.

December 21, 1894.

*Mandamus.*Before Judge Gamble. Emanuel superior court. October term, 1894.

Alfred Herrington and Glenn & Maddox, for plaintiffs in error. H. D. D. Twiggs, Evans & Evans and J. K. Hines, *contra.*

Simmons, Chief Justice.

The solicitor of the county court of Emanuel county applied for a *mandamus*against the commissioners of roads and revenues of that county, requiring them to apply to the payment of his insolvent $osts money received by them from the hire of convicts tried and convicted in the county court. A *mandamus*absolute was granted, and the commissioners excepted. The application for *mandamus*and the order of the judge granting the same were based upon the act of October 16th, 1891, “to authorize county authorities to hire out misdemeanor, convicts, and to provide for the distribution of the *222money arising therefrom,” which act provides that where “said convicts are delivered to any other county or municipal corporation, as now provided by law, said county authorities are hereby authorized to receive compensation for the labor of said convicts, and the money so received shall be first applied to the payment of the fees of the officers of court,” etc. (Acts 1890-1891, vol. 1, p. 212.) The money to be applied in this manner, it will be observed, is to be derived from the hire of convicts to “any other county or municipal corporation.” It appears in this case, however, that the fund in question was derived, not from the hire of convicts to another county or to a municipal corporation, but from their hire to a private person who as an individual employed them in building bridges for the county at an agreed compensation. It was contended that, notwithstanding such hiring was unauthorized by law, yet when the county authorities received money from that source, it became subject to distribution under the provisions of the act. The obvious reply to this is, that the act does not authorize the distribution of a fund derived from a source not contemplated by the act. The mere fact that the money came from the hire of convicts is of no more consequence, so far as any right to subject it to distribution under this act is concerned, than if it came from a source wholly disconnected with the hire of convicts.

It follows that the court erred in granting the *mandamus. Judgment reversed.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 843

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide full service-connected 

disability benefits for persons disabled by treatment or vocational rehabilitation provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs and for survivors of persons dying from such treatment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. REYES (for himself, Mr. EVANS, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. 

FILNER, and Mr. ABERCROMBIE) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide full service-connected disability benefits for persons disabled by 

treatment or vocational rehabilitation provided by the 

Department of Veterans Affairs and for survivors of 

persons dying from such treatment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Injured Veterans Ben5 efits Eligibility Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 843 IH 

1 SEC. 2. FULL SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY BENEFITS 

2 FOR PERSON DISABLED BY TREATMENT OR 

3 VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1151 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(c) A qualifying additional disability or a qualifying 

8 death under this section shall be considered to be a serv9 ice-connected disability, or a death due to a service-con10 nected disability, for purposes of all laws administered by 

11 the Secretary.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (c) of section 

13 1151 of title 38, United States Code, as added by sub14 section (a), shall apply with respect to service-connection 

15 for purposes of eligibility for benefits and services provided 

16 by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on or after the date 

17 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 539

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the admission 

to the United States for permanent residence without numerical limitation of spouses of permanent resident aliens. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

for the admission to the United States for permanent 

residence without numerical limitation of spouses of permanent resident aliens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADMISSION OF SPOUSES OF PERMANENT RESI4 DENT ALIENS WITHOUT NUMERICAL LIMITA5 TION. 

6 (a) REMOVING SPOUSES OF PERMANENT RESIDENT

7 ALIENS FROM PROVISIONS RELATING TO FAMILY-SPON8 SORED IMMIGRANTS.—Section 203(a)(2) of the Immigra-
2

•HR 539 IH 

1 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)(2)) is amend2 ed—

3 (1) in the paragraph heading by striking 

4 ‘‘SPOUSES AND’’; 

5 (2) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘spouses 

6 or’’. 

7 (b) ADDING SPOUSES OF PERMANENT RESIDENT

8 ALIENS TO LIST OF ALIENS NOT SUBJECT TO DIRECT

9 NUMERICAL LIMITATIONS.—Section 201(b)(2) of the Im10 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(2)) is 

11 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara12 graph: 

13 ‘‘(C) Spouses of permanent resident aliens.’’. 

14 (c) PROCEDURE FOR GRANTING IMMIGRANT STA15 TUS.—Section 204(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and 

16 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended 

17 by inserting ‘‘or section 201(b)(2)(C)’’ after 

18 ‘‘201(b)(2)(A)(i))’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing by Terra Nova Financial Group, Inc. (the
"Company") of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, M. Patricia Kane, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: November 19, 2006

/s/ M. Patricia Kane
--------------------
M. Patricia Kane
Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent as shall be expressly set forth by
specific reference in such filing.




                                       31
Because of data processing errors, incorrect U.S. national estimates of nonfatal occupational

injuries and illnesses were published in news releases for reference years 2011 and 2012. 

Corrections will not be made to these news releases and data presented in these releases 

should not be relied upon. Most tables presenting estimates of nonfatal occupational injuries 

and illnesses for reference years 2011 and 2012 have been replaced; however, this table is 

not available and will not be replaced. For additional information see: 

http://www.bls.gov/bls/errata/iif_errata_1014.htm.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 12, 2012

p1205 

# Order

December 12, 2012

145607

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145607

COA: 302088

Ingham CC: 09

- 001367

- FH

DAVID CHUCK CROFF,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 26, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
aena_ex42.htm



EXHIBIT 4.2




 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 





 




  





3











  






 






 




  





4











  






 





 




  





5











  






 





 




  





6











  






 






 




  





7











  






 





 




  





8











  






 





 




  





9











  






 






 




  





10











  






 





 




  





11











  






 





 




  





12











  






 






 




  





I-1











  






 





 




  





I-2











  






 





 




  





I-3











  






 






 




  





I-4











  






 





 




  





I-5











  






 






 




  





II-1











  






 





 




  





II-2











  






 





 




  





II-3











  






 






 




  





II-4











  






 





 




  





II-5











  






 





 




  





III-1











  






 






 




  





III-2











  






 





 




  





III-3











  






 





 




  





III-4











  






 






 




  





III-5











  






 





 




  





IV-1











  






 





 




  





IV-2











  






 






 




  





IV-3











  






 





 




  





IV-4











  






 





 




  





IV-5











  






 






 


IV-6
www.bls.gov

Most New Jobs Among Business & Financial Occupations:

Occupations Projected Job Growth 2022-2032 Median Annual Wage 

Market research analysts and 

marketing specialists 116,600 $68,230 

Project management specialists

95,700

95,370

Management analysts

67,400

95,290

Accountants and auditors

54,700

78,000

Human resource secialists 51,400 62,240 

Business operations specialists, all other 48,700 75,990 

Fastest Growing Business & Financial Occupations:

Occupations Projected Job Growth

Rate 2022-2032

Median Annual Wage 

Market research analysts and 

marketing specialists

20% $82,210

18%

68,230

Management analysts

13%

102,120 

Personal financial advisors 13% 95,390

Financial risk specialists

10% 95,290

Financial examiners

8%

77,520

Additional Business & Financial Occupations:

Occupations Typical Entry-Level Education Median Annual Wage 

Budget analysts Bachelor’s degree $82,260

Compliance officers Bachelor’s degree 71,690

Loan officers

Credit counselors Bachelor’s degree

Bachelor’s degree 65,740

Training and development specialists Bachelor’s degree 63,080

Labor relations specialists Bachelor’s degree 82,010

Cost estimators Bachelor’s degree 71,200

Tax preparers High school diploma or equivalent 48,250

Insurance appraisers, auto damage Postsecondary nondegree award 69,380

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections program.

Business & Financial

Occupations

U.S. Bureau of Labor Stati

47,320

Logisticians
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 26, 2023

No. 04

- 23

- 00051

- CR

IN RE Victor Manuel REGINO DE LA ROSA

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On January 12, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a motion for stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus, which this court granted in part on January 13, 2023. Afte r considering the petition, real party in interest’s response, relator’s reply, and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The s tay imposed on January 13, 2023 is LIFTED

.

It is so ORDERED on April 26, 2023

.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of April, 2023

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This p roceeding arises out of Cause No. 11179CR , styled State of Texas v. Victor Manuel Regino De La Rosa

, pending in the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth presiding.
NOTE:

Unemployment rates by parish and disaster assistance 

Louisiana, October 2005, not seasonally adjus

Caddo

6.7%

Bossier

6.6%

Union

6.3%

Webster

6.6%

La Salle

5.8%

Catahoula

9.9%

Rapides

Vernon 8.2%

9.0%

Jefferson

Davis

12.2%

Acadia

8.8%

Pointe

Coupee

12.4%

St. Landry

11.1%

Caldwell

7.0%

Madison

10.2%

Winn7.8%

Natchitoches

9.1%

Ouachita

7.0%

West

Carroll

9.3%

Claiborne

6.5% East

Carroll

12.1% Lincoln

8.2%

Morehouse

8.5%

Jackson

6.6%

Red River

8.0%

De Soto

6.4%

Bienville

6.9%

Richland

7.7%

Franklin

9.8%

Tensas

20.2%

Sabine

7.0%

Grant

6.9% Concordia 13.6%

Avoyelles

11.0%

Allen

16.4% Beauregard 12.6%

Evangeline

10.7%

East

Feliciana

8.4%

St.

Helena

22.6%

West

Feliciana

11.5%

Calcasieu

17.0%

Cameron

10.1%

Lafayette

8.2%

Vermilion

7.9%

St. Martin

8.1%

Iberville

11.2%

Assumption

12.6%

St. Mary

11.6%

Iberia

9.7% (St.

Martin)

Laf

9

Terrebonne 11.2%

Ascension

9.8% St. John the Baptist

 N.A.

St.

Charles

N.A.

St.

James

16.3%

Livingston

7.5%

Tangipahoa

17.7%

West

B atonRouge

9.3%

East

B atonRouge

10.7%

7.0% or more6.0% to 6.9%5.0% to 5.9%4.0% to 4.9%3.9% or below

Unemployment Rate

Not available

(State rate = 11.7%; U.S. rate = 4.6%)
BF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0574

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MALINDA CRAZYMULE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including August 1, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Jim Rice

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 17 2023

05/17/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0574
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 1, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                             331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,107<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,509)<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     46,945
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,148
<PP&E>                                         211,382<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (95,397)<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,888
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   318,386
<SALES>                                        147,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,073
<CGS>                                          128,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,313
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,673)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,645)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.35)
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNTS ARE REPORTED NET OF RESERVES IN THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO








18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,








AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO








SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of Infinite Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Villa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and








(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
SEC or its staff upon request.





Dated: November 12,
2019








__/s/ James
Villa


James Villa


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5198 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5198

    To clarify issues of criminal jurisdiction within the exterior 
                      boundaries of Pueblo lands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 2004

  Mr. Udall of New Mexico (for himself and Mr. Pearce) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To clarify issues of criminal jurisdiction within the exterior 
                      boundaries of Pueblo lands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDIAN PUEBLO LAND ACT AMENDMENTS.

    The Act of June 7, 1924 (43 Stat. 636, chapter 331), is amended by 
adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 20. CRIMINAL JURISDICTION.

    ``(a) In General.--Except as otherwise provided by Congress, 
jurisdiction over offenses committed anywhere within the exterior 
boundaries of any grant from a prior sovereign, as confirmed by 
Congress or the Court of Private land Claims to a Pueblo Indian tribe 
of new Mexico, shall be as provided in this section.
    ``(b) Jurisdiction of the Pueblo.--The Pueblo has jurisdiction, as 
an act of the Pueblos' inherent power as an Indian tribe, over any 
offense committed by a member of the Pueblo or of another federally 
recognized Indian tribe, or by any other Indian-owned entity.
    ``(c) Jurisdiction of the United States.--The United States has 
jurisdiction over any offense described in chapter 53 of title 18, 
United States Code, committed by or against a member of any federally 
recognized Indian tribe or any Indian-owned entity, or that involves 
any Indian property or interest.
    ``(d) Jurisdiction of the State of New Mexico.--The State of New 
Mexico shall have jurisdiction over any offense committed by a person 
who is not a member of a federally recognized Indian tribe, which 
offense is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
# 19SNR06_00
# 11-12

Environmental Heat 2011-2012 - continued		

Environmental Heat 2011-2012		

Environmental Heat 2011-2012 - continued		

Environmental Heat 2011-2012		

Page &P