alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
76

Table 35. Unincorporated self-employed persons in nonagricultural industries by sex, 1976-2005 annual averages 

(Numbers in thousands)

Total 

employed

Selfemployed

Selfemployed as 

a percent of 

total

Total 

employed

Selfemployed

Selfemployed as 

a percent of 

total

Total 

employed

Selfemployed

Selfemployed as 

a percent of 

total

1976...... 85,421 5,782 6.8 35,027 1,549 4.4 50,394 4,233 8.4 26.8

1977..... 88,734 6,115 6.9 36,677 1,692 4.6 52,057 4,423 8.5 27.7

1978..... 92,661 6,428 6.9 38,900 1,814 4.7 53,761 4,614 8.6 28.2

1979..... 95,477 6,792 7.1 40,556 1,982 4.9 54,921 4,810 8.8 29.2

1980..... 95,938 7,001 7.3 41,461 2,097 5.1 54,477 4,904 9.0 30.0

1981..... 97,030 7,097 7.3 42,333 2,192 5.2 54,697 4,905 9.0 30.9

1982..... 96,125 7,263 7.6 42,591 2,309 5.4 53,534 4,954 9.3 31.8

1983..... 97,450 7,575 7.8 43,367 2,439 5.6 54,083 5,136 9.5 32.2

1984...... 101,685 7,785 7.7 45,262 2,566 5.7 56,423 5,219 9.2 33.0

1985..... 103,971 7,810 7.5 46,615 2,603 5.6 57,356 5,207 9.1 33.3

1986..... 106,435 7,881 7.4 48,054 2,610 5.4 58,381 5,271 9.0 33.1

1987..... 109,232 8,201 7.5 49,668 2,778 5.6 59,564 5,423 9.1 33.9

1988...... 111,800 8,519 7.6 51,020 2,955 5.8 60,780 5,564 9.2 34.7

1989..... 114,143 8,605 7.5 52,341 3,043 5.8 61,802 5,562 9.0 35.4

1990...... 115,570 8,719 7.5 53,011 3,122 5.9 62,559 5,597 8.9 35.8

1991..... 114,449 8,850 7.7 52,815 3,150 6.0 61,634 5,700 9.2 35.6

1992..... 115,246 8,576 7.4 53,380 2,963 5.6 61,866 5,613 9.1 34.5

1993..... 117,144 8,959 7.6 54,273 3,065 5.6 62,871 5,894 9.4 34.2

1994..... 119,651 9,003 7.5 55,755 3,443 6.2 63,896 5,560 8.7 38.2

1995..... 121,460 8,901 7.3 56,642 3,440 6.1 64,818 5,461 8.4 38.6

1996..... 123,264 8,971 7.3 57,630 3,506 6.1 65,634 5,465 8.3 39.1

1997..... 126,159 9,056 7.2 59,026 3,550 6.0 67,133 5,506 8.2 39.2

1998..... 128,085 8,962 7.0 59,945 3,482 5.8 68,140 5,480 8.0 38.9

1999..... 130,207 8,790 6.8 61,193 3,424 5.6 69,014 5,366 7.8 39.0

2000..... 134,427 9,205 6.8 62,983 3,631 5.8 71,444 5,573 7.8 39.4

2001..... 134,635 9,121 6.8 63,147 3,594 5.7 71,488 5,527 7.7 39.4

2002...... 134,174 8,923 6.7 62,995 3,499 5.6 71,179 5,425 7.6 39.2

2003..... 135,461 9,344 6.9 63,824 3,609 5.7 71,636 5,736 8.0 38.6

2004...... 137,020 9,467 6.9 64,182 3,607 5.6 72,838 5,860 8.0 38.1

2005..... 141,730 9,509 6.7 65,757 3,565 5.4 75,973 5,944 7.8 37.5

Selfemployed 

women as 

percent of 

total selfemployed

Year

Total Women Men

NOTE: Beginning in 2000, data reflect the introduction of the

2002 Census industry classification system derived from the 2002

North American Industry Classification System into the Current

Population Survey (CPS).

SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of

Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1857

AILA TUULIKKI LORING, Personal representative of the estate of Seldon Loring, deceased; LEILA LORING, on behalf of her deceased father Seldon Loring; JAANA LORING MELIA, on behalf of her deceased father Seldon Loring , Plaintiffs

- Appellees ,

v. SOUTHERN AIR CHARTER COMPANY, LTD., Springdale, Maryland; SOUTHERN AIR CHARTER COMPANY, LIMITED, Nassau, Bahamas; ALPHA GIBBS , Defendants

- Appellants

.

Appeal from t he United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paula Xinis , District Judge. ( 8:16

- cv
- 03844

- PX )

Submitted : September 18, 2018 Decided: September 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Bruce Allen Johnson, Jr., Bowie, Maryland, for Appellants. Bruce Plaxen , PLAXEN & ADLER, PA, Columbia, Maryland ; Joseph Peter Musacchio, KREINDLER &2 KREINDLER, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s order denying their motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens

. Appellees have filed a motion t o dismiss this appeal as interlocutory. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order the Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard , 486 U.S. 517, 527

- 30 (1988)

. Accordingly, we grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We further deny the motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cour t and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 530 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 530

                For the relief of Tanya Andrea Goudeau.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2003

  Mr. Baker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Tanya Andrea Goudeau.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR TANYA ANDREA GOUDEAU.

    (a) In General.--Tanya Andrea Goudeau shall be classified as a 
child under section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
for purposes of approval of a relative visa petition filed under 
section 204 of such Act by her adoptive parent and the filing of an 
application for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Tanya Andrea Goudeau enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the petition and the application for 
issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of 
status are filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Tanya Andrea Goudeau, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
for the current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level of 
family-sponsored immigrants under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Tanya Andrea 
Goudeau shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR CITIZENSHIP.

    For purposes of section 320 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
Tanya Andrea Goudeau shall be considered to have satisfied the 
requirements applicable to adopted children under section 101(b)(1) of 
such Act.
                                 <all>
```
2012.12.31 Ex-10.1.2






Exhibit 10.1.2


ACTIONS TAKEN AND RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY 
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY BENEFITS COMMITTEE


The undersigned, representing the majority of the members of The Coca-Cola Company Benefits Committee (the "Committee"), hereby approve and adopt the following Resolutions:


WHEREAS, The Coca-Cola Company (the “Company”) currently maintains The 
Coca-Cola Company Supplemental Disability Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2003 (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.4 of the Plan, the Committee may terminate the Plan at any time;


WHEREAS, effective at midnight on December 31, 2012, all employees shall cease participation in the Plan;


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Committee hereby terminates the Plan effective as of midnight on December 31, 2012;


BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the members of the Committee are hereby authorized and directed to take any other action that may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the intent of these Resolutions.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned members of the Committee have executed this Resolution effective as of midnight on December 31, 2012.




Date: __12/6/12______                /s/ Christopher P. Nolan__________
                            


Date: __12/6/12______                /s/ Chuck Lischer________________
                        
                            
Date: __12/6/12______                /s/ Susan M. Fleming_____________
                            
                            
Date: __12/6/12______                /s/ Alison Schmidt_______________
                            
                            
Date: ______________                ______________________________
                                        
                            
Date: ______________                ______________________________
# 19QRTL3_00
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 26, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01002

- CV

VALPAK DIRECT MARKET ING SYSTEMS, INC. , Appellant
V.
COLONIAL SAVINGS, F.A. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 03570

- 2018



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Pedersen, III Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III

Before the Court is th e parties’ February 19, 2019 joint motion to dismiss the appeal. In

the motion, they state they have reached an agreement to compromise and settle their differences.

We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.

181002F.P05 /Bill Pedersen, III/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

VALPAK DIRECT MARKETING SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant

No. 05

- 18

- 01002

- CV V.

COLONIAL SAVINGS, F.A., Appellee On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 03570

- 2018. Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III, Justices Brown and Schenck participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDER ED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 26th day of February, 2019.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Nos. 333-138420, 333-134542, 333-124969, 333-123816, 333-108009, 333-91072,
333-91070, 333-72194, 333-55520, 333-39928) on Form S-8 of Occam Networks, Inc. and subsidiary of our report dated October 15, 2007, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial
statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Occam Networks, Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2006. Our report dated October 15, 2007
relating to the consolidated financial statements includes an emphasis paragraph relating to the restatement of the Company's consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 25,
2005 and December 26, 2004.

SINGER
LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP

Los
Angeles, California
October 15, 2007

---



QuickLinks
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

County of Allegheny, Pennsylvania, :

Appellant :

:

v. :

:

Allegheny County Prison Employees : No. 1469 C.D. 2019

Independent Union :

 O R D E R

AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2021, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

the above-captioned opinion filed November 19, 2020, shall be designated 

OPINION rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION and it shall be reported.

_____________________________________

CHRISTINE FIZZANO CANNON, Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                        ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                             DENARII RESOURCES INC.
          FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stuart  Carnie,  am the Chief  Executive  Officer and acting Chief  Financial
Officer of Denarii  Resources Inc., a Nevada  corporation (the "Company").  I am
delivering this certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the nine month period ended September 30, 2008 and filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 15, 2008


By: /s/ Stuart Carnie
   -----------------------------------
   STUART CARNIE
   Chief Executive Officer, President,
   acting Chief Financial Officer,
   acting Principal Accounting Officer
   and Director
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Amwaj Al-Sahel Company ) ) Under ContractNo. W91GF5-09-P-0458 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59679

Mr. Hatem Rateb

Owner Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Jamal A. Rhinehardt, J A

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL FORFAILURE TO PROSECUTE Appellant filed this appeal from a contracting officer's decision denying its claim on 17 November 2014. Afterthe pleadings were filed, the Board, by Order dated 12 February 2015, directed the parties to indicate how they wished to proceed with respect to whether a hearing was required. By Order dated 3 March 2015, in response to appellant's 27 February 2015 letter, the Board clarified that the parties were to elect whetherthey desired to proceedto a hearing, a submission on the record, or alternative dispute resolution. In a 15 April 2015 letter, the governmentrequested an oral hearing. Appellant did not make an election in response to the 12 February 2015 and 3 March 2015 Orders. By Order dated 17 April 2015, the Board directed the parties tojointly propose three hearing dates within 30 days ofthe date ofthe Order. In a 9 May 2015 letter, the government stated that it had attempted to contact appellant to discuss possible hearing dates, butthat appellant had not responded. The government therefore requested an extension oftime to comply with the Board's 17 April 2015 Order. By Order dated 11May2015,the Board granted the government's extension request and directed the parties to respond to the 17 April 2015 Orderno laterthan 16 June 2015. In an 18 June 2015 letter, the government stated that it had been unable to contact appellant. By Order dated 22 June 2015, appellant was directed to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack ofprosecution. The Order statedthat ifappellant failed to comply within 21 days, the Board may dismiss the appeal with prejudice under Board Rule 17 for failure to prosecutewithout further notice to the parties. To date, no response has been received.Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed withprejudice under BoardRule 17 for failure to prosecute. Dated: 23 July 2015

I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals 

## .. N. STEMPLER Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I concur

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals inASBCANo. 59679, Appeal ofAmwaj Al-Sahel Company, rendered in conformance withthe Board's Charter.
Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals 

## •
[Doc. No. 10]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

LAURA SAUNDERS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY, INC.,

et al.,

 Defendants.

Civil No. 11-3379-JHR-KMW

ORDER

This matter having been brought before the Court by Felice

Grant, Esquire, of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., counsel for

Defendant, Keller Williams Realty, Inc., for an Order allowing

David M. Foster, Esquire, to appear and participate pro hac vice;

and the Court having considered the moving papers; and there

being no opposition to this application; and for good cause shown

pursuant to Local Rule 101.1(c), United States District Court for

the District of New Jersey;

IT IS this 19th day of July, 2011 hereby

ORDERED that David M. Foster, Esquire, a member of the Bars

of the State of Virginia, District of Columbia and the United

States District Court for the District of Columbia, be permitted

to appear pro hac vice in the above-captioned matter in the

1

Case 1:11-cv-03379-RMB-KMW Document 13 Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 106
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

pursuant to Local Rule 101.1(c); provided, however, that all

pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the Court shall be

signed by Felice Grant, Esquire, or another attorney associated

with Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., who is a member in good

standing with the Bar of the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the

Bar of this Court, who shall be held responsible for said papers

and for the conduct of the case, and who shall be present before

the Court during all phases of this proceeding, unless expressly

excused by the Court, as well as be held responsible for the

conduct of the attorney admitted pro hac vice pursuant to this

Order; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to L. CIV. R. 101.1(c)(2), David M.

Foster, Esquire, shall pay the annual fee to the New Jersey

Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection in accordance with New Jersey

Court Rule 1:28-2 within twenty (20) days from the date of the

entry of this Order, enclosing with payment a completed Form PHV8, which form can be found at njcourtsonline.com; and it is

further

ORDERED that, pursuant to L. CIV. R. 101.1(c)(3), David M.

Foster, Esquire, shall make a payment of $150.00, payable to the

Clerk, United States District Court; and it is further

ORDERED that David M. Foster, Esquire, shall be bound by the

2

Case 1:11-cv-03379-RMB-KMW Document 13 Filed 07/19/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 107
General and Admiralty Rules of the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey, including but not limited to the

provisions of Local Rule 103.1, Judicial Ethics and Professional

Responsibility, and Local Rule 104.1, Discipline of Attorneys;

and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to L. CIV. R. 101.1(c)(4), David M.

Foster, Esquire, shall be deemed to have agreed to take no fee in

any tort case in excess of the New Jersey Court Contingency Fee

Rule, Rule 1:21-7, as amended.

s/ Karen M. Williams 

KAREN M. WILLIAMS

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez

3

Case 1:11-cv-03379-RMB-KMW Document 13 Filed 07/19/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 108
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, August 18, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, August 18, 2009, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. 
Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-
1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 
Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 16, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-17444 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P