alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# County Employment and Wages Full Data Update

The County Employment and Wages Full Data Update (CEWDAT) informs the public that the database for the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages has been fully updated. This activity replaces the partial update provided with the County Employment and Wages news release (CEWQTR), which is usually issued about two weeks before the full data update. Both releases are issued quarterly. For more information, visit the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages home page at www.bls/gov/cew/.

- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 3rd quarter 2023
- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 2nd quarter 2023
- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 1st quarter 2023
- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 4th quarter 2022
- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 3rd quarter 2022
- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 2nd quarter 2022
- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 1st quarter 2022
- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 4th quarter 2021
- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 3rd quarter 2021
- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 2nd quarter 2021
- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 1st quarter 2021
- County Employment and Wages (QCEW) database now fully updated through 4th quarter 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                                          <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000       JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000       SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1                 1
<CASH>                                                590               590
<SECURITIES>                                            0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      33,853            33,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                          200               200
<INVENTORY>                                         8,510             8,510
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   46,457            46,547
<PP&E>                                             25,046            25,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                     12,864            12,864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     98,322            98,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              28,901            28,901
<BONDS>                                            57,346            57,346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               1,900             1,900
<PREFERRED>                                             0                 0
<COMMON>                                              114               114
<OTHER-SE>                                          6,766             6,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       98,322            98,322
<SALES>                                            72,701            24,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   72,701            24,195
<CGS>                                              46,823            13,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      46,823            13,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   17,088             7,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  7,495             2,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     1,296               461
<INCOME-TAX>                                          454               119
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   842               342
<DISCONTINUED>                                      1,300             1,300
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       726               726
<CHANGES>                                               0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        2,867             2,368
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .25               .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .24               .20



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-K of Microtune, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Kupp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|/s/ JEFFREY A. KUPP                                                                                  
|Jeffrey A. Kupp Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer)



Date: March 3, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

____________________________________ 

:

LORENZO FLORENTINO DELGADO : 

DIAZ, :

:

Petitioner, : Civil Action No. 11-4029 (SRC)

:

v. :

: ORDER

WAYNE MULLER et al., :

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

CHESLER, U.S.D.J.

This matter comes before the Court on the application by Petitioner Lorenzo Florentino

Delgado Diaz (“Diaz”) for an order to show cause, seeking to bring on his § 2241 Petition for a

hearing on an expedited basis. On June 10, 2011, Diaz filed his Petition and application in the

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Respondents opposed the

Petition on the ground that, inter alia, jurisdiction lay in only the district of confinement, New

Jersey, pursuant to Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 443 (2004). On July 7, 2011, the Court,

agreeing with Respondents, transferred the case to the District of New Jersey. This Court now

has before it Petitioner’s application for an order to show cause.

Petitioner’s application for an order to show cause to bring on an expedited hearing of his

Petition must be denied. Plaintiff has failed to comply with L. CIV. R. 65.1(a), which states: “No

order to show cause to bring on a matter for hearing will be granted except on a clear and specific

showing by affidavit or verified pleading of good and sufficient reasons why a procedure other

than by notice of motion is necessary.” Petitioner has supplied no such affidavit or verified

Case 2:11-cv-04029-SRC Document 16 Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 236
pleading of good and sufficient reasons why a procedure other than by notice of motion is

necessary. Nor does the brief in support of the application for an order to show cause even

address the question of what such reasons might be. In the absence of a clear and specific

showing of a reason why this application should receive the expedited treatment appropriate for

applications for emergency relief, the application must be denied. This Court declines to hear the

Petition on an expedited basis, and it will be heard according to the usual schedule for hearing

motions on notice.

For these reasons,

IT IS THEREFORE on this 18th day of July, 2011,

ORDERED that Petitioner’s application for an order to show cause is DENIED, and the

Petition shall not be heard on an expedited basis.

 s/ Stanley R. Chesler 

Stanley R. Chesler, U.S.D.J.

2

Case 2:11-cv-04029-SRC Document 16 Filed 07/19/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 237
Ex 10.53 Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Option Under 2012 Stock Plan






Exhibit 10.53


ZELTIQ AESTHETICS, INC. 
NOTICE OF GRANT OF STOCK OPTION
The ZELTIQ Aesthetics, Inc. (the “Company”) has granted to the Participant an option (the “Option”) to purchase certain shares of Stock of the Company pursuant to the ZELTIQ Aesthetics, Inc. 2012 Stock Plan (the “Plan”), as follows:


	
				
	Participant:
	 
	Employee ID:
	 

	Date of Grant:
	 
	 
	 

	Number of Option Shares:
	 
	, subject to adjustment as provided by the Option Agreement.

	Exercise Price:
	 
	 
	 

	Initial Vesting Date:
	 
	 
	 

	Option Expiration Date:
	 
	 
	 

	Tax Status of Option:
	 
	Stock Option. (Enter "Incentive" or "Nonstatutory". If blank,

	 
	this Option will be a Nonstatutory Stock Option.

	Vested Shares:
	Except as provided in the Option Agreement, the number of Vested Shares (disregarding any resulting fractional share) as of any date is determined by multiplying the Number of Option Shares by the “Vested Ratio” determined as of such date as follows:

	 
	 
	Vested Ratio

	 
	Prior to Initial Vesting Date
	 

	 
	On Initial Vesting Date, provided the Participant's Service as an Employee has not terminated prior to  Month XX, 20XX
	 

	 
	Plus
	 

	 
	For each additional full month of the Participant's continuous Service as an Employee from Initial Vesting Date until the Vested Ratio equals 1/1, an additional
	




	Superseding Agreement:
	NONE

	 
	The terms and conditions of the foregoing Superseding Agreement (if any) to which the Participant is a party shall, notwithstanding any provision of the Option Agreement to the contrary, supersede any inconsistent term or condition set forth in the Option Agreement to the extent intended by such Superseding Agreement.






By their signatures below or by electronic acceptance or authentication in a form authorized by the Company, the Company and the Participant agree that the Option is governed by this Grant Notice and by the provisions of the Plan and the Option Agreement, both of which are made a part of this document.  The Participant represents that the Participant has read and is familiar with the provisions of the Plan and the Option Agreement, and hereby accepts the Option subject to all of their terms and conditions.


	
				
	ZELTIQ AESTHETICS, INC.
	 
	PARTICIPANT

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	 
	 

	Sergio Garcia
	 
	Signature

	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	 
	Date

	Mark J. Foley
	 
	 

	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	Address
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

35. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

(In thousands)

Category

Total Age Sex

2001 2002

16 to 24

years

25 to 54

years

55 years

and over Men Women

2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002

Total not in the labor force ............................ 71,359 72,707 12,347 12,976 19,814 20,358 39,198 39,373 26,396 27,085 44,962 45,621

 Do not want a job now 1 ............................. 66,769 68,029 10,616 11,254 17,797 18,286 38,355 38,489 24,403 24,994 42,366 43,035

 Want a job 1 ................................................ 4,590 4,677 1,730 1,722 2,017 2,071 842 884 1,993 2,091 2,597 2,586

 Did not search for work in previous year .. 2,731 2,673 939 910 1,150 1,112 642 651 1,134 1,135 1,597 1,538

 Searched for work in previous year 2 ....... 1,859 2,004 791 812 867 960 201 233 859 956 1,000 1,048

 Not available to work now ....................... 593 565 300 272 256 252 37 41 228 227 365 338

 Available to work now ............................. 1,266 1,439 492 540 611 708 163 191 631 729 634 710

 Reason not currently looking:

 Discouragement over job prospects 3 321 369 104 110 170 209 47 51 192 226 129 143

 Reasons other than discouragement .. 945 1,070 388 430 441 499 116 141 440 503 505 567

 Family responsibilities ...................... 133 150 32 31 89 99 13 20 29 34 105 116

 In school or training .......................... 203 238 172 195 30 41 1 2 111 126 92 112

 Ill health or disability ......................... 96 107 16 16 56 61 25 30 45 50 51 56

 Other 4 .............................................. 513 575 168 188 266 299 77 88 255 292 257 283

1 Includes some persons who are not asked if they want a job. 2 Persons who had a job in the prior 12 months must have searched

since the end of that job. 3 Includes believes no work available, could not find work, lacks

necessary schooling or training, employer thinks too young or old, and

other types of discrimination. 4 Includes those who did not actively look for work in the prior 4

weeks for such reasons as child-care and transportation problems, as

well as a small number for which reason for nonparticipation was not

ascertained.
Exhibit 21.1

OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.        Subsidiaries of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.

Registrant's significant consolidated subsidiaries and the state or jurisdiction of organization of each subsidiary are shown below:

Name of Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Percentage
OwnershipOmniVision International Holding Ltd.

Cayman Islands


100
%OmniVision Technology International Ltd., (formerly Hua Wei Technology International, Ltd.)

Cayman Islands


100
%OmniVision Technologies (Hong Kong) Company Limited

Hong Kong, China


100
%OmniVision Trading (Hong Kong) Company Limited

Hong Kong, China


100
%OmniVision Semiconductor (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (formerly Hua Wei Semiconductor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.)

China


100
%OmniVision Technologies (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., (formerly Shanghai OmniVision IC Design Co., Ltd.)

China


100
%Taiwan OmniVision Technologies Co., Ltd.

Taiwan


100
%Taiwan OmniVision International Technologies, Co., Ltd.

Taiwan


100
%Taiwan OmniVision Investment Holding Co., Ltd.

Taiwan


100
%OmniVision Holding (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.

Hong Kong, China


100
%OmniVision Investment Holding (BVI) Ltd.

British Virgin Islands


100
%Shanghai OmniVision Semiconductor Technology Co. Ltd.

China


100
%OmniVision Optoelectronics Company Limited

Cayman Islands


100
%OmniVision Optoelectronics Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd

China


100
%


---



QuickLinks
art_ex102.htm


Exhibit 10.02


 


[ARTEMIS ACQUISITION CORPORATION]


 







 


Executive Hiring Agreement


 


Today February 20, 2013, this hiring agreement between Artemis Acquisition Corp. and John Ronda Sr. as our President of Artemis Acquisition Corp. parent public company.


 


Salary is to be at $250,000 per year, for now starting at $1000 per week for the next 120 days or less, until Artemis is trading publicly and will be able to increase all officers’ salaries at that time.


 


President / John Ronda will receive 5,000,000 common shares as a hiring bonus.  Future stock bonuses and stock grants / options will be determined and agreed upon with all officers of the Company.


 


Plans to be agreed upon in the future for the Company to pay for an office in California for John Ronda is agreed and will be offered when the Company is financially able to provide in the coming months.


 


All expenses for travel or lodging for the company will be paid by the company.


 


This agreement will be for a five year period from today’s date.


 








 


 



	/s/ John Ronda Sr.	 
	John Ronda Sr.	 
	 	 
	/s/ Pete Iodice	 
	Pete Iodice	 
	Vice Chairman of the board	 
	Artemis Acquisition Corp.	 
	 	 
	/s/ Robert Nash	 
	Robert Nash	 
	Senior Vice President	 
	Artemis Acquisition Corp.
NO. 07-10-00438-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B FEBRUARY 22, 2011

LUIS ANGEL OLVERA, APPELLANT

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

FROM THE 222ND DISTRICT CO URT OF DEAF SMITH COUNTY; NO. CR-10D-041; HONORABLE ROLAND D. SAUL, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., a nd CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Luis Angel Olvera appeals his conviction for felony driving while intoxicated. The certification of right to appeal executed by the trial court states that this “is a plea bargain case and the defendant has NO right of appeal and the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” This fact was brought to the attention of appellant by letter and he was granted an opportunity to obtain an amended certif ication entitling him to appeal. No such certification was received within the time we allotted. Having received no amended certification, we dismiss t he appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Chavez2 v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) (appellate court must dismiss prohibited appeal without further action).

James T. Campbell Justice

Do not publish.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36483-36484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17499]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1269-001]


Escondido Energy Center, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

July 16, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Escondido Energy Center, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 27, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission,

[[Page 36484]]

888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ecaaa9beafa38280858289bf999c9c839e98ac8a899e8fc28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5e3e0f7e6eacbc9cccbc0f6d0d5d5cad7d1e5c3c0d7c68bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17499 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 11

- 2000

_____________

BRITTANY MORROW; EMILY MORROW,

Minors, In Their Own Right, And By Their Parents

and Natural Guardians, Bradley Morrow and Diedre Morrow;

BRADLEY M ORROW; DIEDRE MORROW, Individually,

Appellants

v.

BARRY BALASKI, Individually;

THE BLACKHAWK SCHOOL DISTRICT

_____________

On Appeal from the District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(No. 2:10

- cv

- 00292)

Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan

_____________

Argued on October 10, 2012

Opinion Filed June 5, 2012

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES,

SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR.,

VANASKIE and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER A MENDING OPINION

At the direction of the Court, i t is hereby O R D E R E D that the opinion filed June 5,

2013 shall be amended.

Accordingly, the majority opinion is amended as follows:1. Judge Ambro ’s participation is the majority opinion will be chan ged from "joins

Section III B. of the majority only" to "joining in judgment as expressed ”;

2. "Fourtheenth" on page 9 of the slip opinion will be changed to "Fourteenth" ;

3. T he citation to "Fuentes Dissent 18" on page 14 will be changed to "Fuentes

Dis sent 21" ;

4. The citation to "Fuentes Dissent 18" on page 14, footnote 11, will be changed to

"Fuentes Dissent 21" ;

5 T he citation to "Fuentes Dissent 18

- 19" on page 15 will be changed to "Fuentes

Dissent 21" ;

6. The citation to "Fuentes Dissent 3" on page 15 will be changed to "Fuentes

Dissent 3

- 4" ;

7. T he citation to "Fuentes Dissent 9" on page 16 will be changed to "Fuentes

Dissent 10" ;

8. The citation to "Fuentes Dissent 9" on page 16, footnote 13 will be changed to

"Fuentes Dissent 10" ;

9. The c itation to "Fuentes Dissent 3" on page 17 will be changed to "Fuentes

Dissent 3

- 4" ;

10. The citation to "Fuentes Dissent 14" on page 17, footnote 14, will be changed to

"Fuentes Dissent 16" ;

11. The citation to "Fuentes Dissent 10" on page 18 will be cha nged to "Fuentes

Dissent 12

- 15" ;

12. The citation to "Fuentes Dissent 13" on page 20 will be changed to "Fuentes

Dissent 14

- 15" ;

13. The citation to "Fuentes Dissent 6 n.3" on page 21 will be changed to "Fuentes

Dissent 7 n.3" ; and,

14. The citation to "Fuentes Dissent 24" on page 27 will be changed to "Fuentes

Dissent 29

. "

Judge Ambro’s concurring and dissenting opinion is amended as follows:1. The citation to “Fuentes Dissent 26 on page 2 will be changed to “ Fuentes Dissent

31 .”

Judge Fuentes’s dis senting opinion is amended as follows:

1. The citation to “Majority Op. at 13” on page 19 will be changed to “Majority Op.

at 12” ; and,

2. The citation to “Majority Op. at 26” on page 30 will be changed to “Majority Op.

at 27 .”

Fo r the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: June 14, 2013

tmk/cc: Albert A. Torrence, Esq.

John J. Hare, Attorney