alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 752 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 752

To prohibit oil and gas drilling in Finger Lakes National Forest in New 
                                 York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2003

    Mr. Walsh (for himself, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Rangel, Ms. 
 Slaughter, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Olver, Mr. Engel, Ms. Kaptur, 
 Mr. Rahall, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Meeks of New 
  York, Mr. Owens, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. 
  Serrano, Mr. Acevedo-Vila, Mr. Towns, Mr. Weiner, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. 
Gilchrest, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Stupak, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Nadler, Mr. 
  Crowley, and Mr. Boehlert) introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit oil and gas drilling in Finger Lakes National Forest in New 
                                 York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OIL AND GAS DRILLING IN FINGER LAKES NATIONAL FOREST IN NEW 
              YORK PROHIBITED.

    No Federal permit or lease shall be issued for oil or gas drilling 
in Finger Lakes National Forest in New York.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 By:
    /s/ Dominick GolioName:
    Dominick GolioTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer  34
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4976 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require emergency contraception 

to be included on the uniform formulary of pharmaceutical agents of 

the pharmacy benefits program of the Department of Defense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2004 

Mr. MICHAUD (for himself, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. DEGETTE, and Mrs. DAVIS

of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require emergency 

contraception to be included on the uniform formulary 

of pharmaceutical agents of the pharmacy benefits program of the Department of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4976 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO INCLUDE EMERGENCY CON2 TRACEPTION ON UNIFORM FORMULARY OF 

3 PHARMACEUTICAL AGENTS OF THE PHAR4 MACY BENEFITS PROGRAM OF THE DEPART5 MENT OF DEFENSE. 

6 Section 1074g(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new para8 graph: 

9 ‘‘(9)(A) Emergency contraception shall be included 

10 on the uniform formulary. 

11 ‘‘(B) Notwithstanding paragraph (4), no prior au12 thorization may be required for emergency contraception. 

13 Nothing in the preceding sentence may be construed as 

14 waiving any provision of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos15 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) or any other Act admin16 istered by the Food and Drug Administration. 

17 ‘‘(C) In this paragraph, the term ‘emergency contra18 ception’ means a drug, drug regimen, or device that is— 

19 ‘‘(i) used postcoitally; 

20 ‘‘(ii) prevents pregnancy by delaying ovulation, 

21 preventing fertilization of an egg, or preventing im22 plantation of an egg in a uterus; and 

23 ‘‘(iii) is approved by the Food and Drug Ad24 ministration.’’. 

Æ
# 16SNR03_00

# image1.png
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

30. Unemployed total and full-time workers by duration of unemployment

[Numbers in thousands]

Duration of unemployment

Total Full-time workers

Unemployed Percent distribution Unemployed Percent distribution

2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,747 12,506 100.0 100.0 11,914 10,699 100.0 100.0

Less than 5 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,677 2,644 19.5 21.1 2,027 1,967 17.0 18.4

5 to 14 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,993 2,866 21.8 22.9 2,507 2,381 21.0 22.3

5 to 10 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,906 1,832 13.9 14.6 1,574 1,506 13.2 14.1

11 to 14 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,087 1,035 7.9 8.3 932 875 7.8 8.2

15 weeks and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,077 6,996 58.8 55.9 7,381 6,351 62.0 59.4

15 to 26 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,061 1,859 15.0 14.9 1,818 1,622 15.3 15.2

27 weeks and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,016 5,136 43.8 41.1 5,563 4,728 46.7 44.2

27 to 51 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,709 1,472 12.4 11.8 1,559 1,345 13.1 12.6

52 weeks and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,307 3,664 31.3 29.3 4,004 3,383 33.6 31.6

Average (mean) duration, in weeks1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39.3 39.4 – – 41.6 42.0 – –

Median duration, in weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.4 19.3 – – 24.1 21.8 – –

1 Beginning in January 2011, this series reflects a change to the collection of data on unemployment duration. For more information, see www.bls.gov/cps/duration.htm.

NOTE: Full-time workers are unemployed persons looking for full-time work (35 hours or more per week) or on layoff from full-time jobs. Updated population controls are

introduced annually with the release of January data. Dash indicates no data or data that do not meet publication criteria (values not shown where base is less than 35,000).

1
#### Gaines *v.*City of New Orleans.1

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Louisiana.*

March, 1886.)

*Í.*Equity—Practice—How Regulated.

The equity practice in the courts of the United States is regulated by the laws of congress, and the rules of the supreme court of the United States made under the authority of an act of congress.

2. Same—Deposit of Fund in Registry.

The equity practice in the United States courts requires the court, that all parties who can by possibility have an interest in the fund, except a fraction of the defendant; unite in the application, to order the, deposit of a fund garnished in the registry of the court, notwithstanding that the stakeholder, who is the agent of defendant, also resists.

On Motion for an Order Requiring Funds to be Deposited in the Registry of the Court.

*Henry C. Miller,*for Louisiana National Bank, garnishee.

*Thomas J. Semmes*and *Alfred Goldthwaite,*for plaintiff.

*F. T. Nichols*and *Chas. Carroll,*for Gas-light Company.

*Walter H. Rogers,*City Atty., for defendant.

1

 Reported by Joseph R. Hornor, Esq., of the New Orleans bar.

Billings, J.

The question submitted is whether the sum of $40,-000, on deposit with the Louisiana National Bank, shall be deposited in the registry of the court. The hank has been garnished; lias no interest in the money; holds the same as the fiscal agent of the defendant. The money is claimed by the plaintiff under her writ of execution, by the gas-light company under an ordinance of the city of New Orleans, and by the hoard of liquidation. The plaintiff and the gas-light company unite in the motion for an order requiring the deposit.

The execution under which the money was seized issued in an equity cause. Under the practice in the courts of the state of Louis*412iana such an order would not be made; under the practice of the courts of chancery such an order would be made. 3 Daniell, Ch. Pr. 1819 *et seq.;*Jeremy, Eq. Jur. 254. It is not necessary to show that the fund is in danger, but merely that the plaintiff is solely entitled, or has such, an interest jointly with others as to justify him on behalf of himself and them to have the fund secured. In all equity causes the chancery rules are followed 'to the exclusion of state practice. In *Bein*v. *Heath,*12 How. 178, Taney, C. J., says: “The proceeding in a circuit court of the United States is regulated by the laws of congress, and the rules of this court made under the authority of an act of congress.” This case holds that even by a rule of the circuit court the equity practice cannot be departed from. The conclusion, therefore, is that the equity practice is to govern, and that that practice requires the court, that all parties who can by possibility have an interest in the fund, except a fraction of the defendfendant, unite in the application, the court ought not to refuse to order the deposit because the stakeholder, who is the agent of the defendant, also resists.

The order will therefore he entered.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the filing by Rush Financial Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2006 (the "Report"), I, Dewey M. Moore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
               2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operation of the Company.







                                                /s/ Michael G. Nolan
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Michael G. Nolan
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  August 21, 2006


This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent as shall be expressly set forth by
specific reference in such filing.




                                       34
---

---

Exhibit 8

List of Subsidiaries

Significant Active Subsidiaries

|                                                      |             
|----------------------------------------------------- | ------------
|
|
|
|
|Subs Name                                             | Country     
|Alvarion BWA Wireless Solutions India Private Limited | India       
|Alvarion del Ecuador S.A                              | Ecuador     
|Alvarion Chile LIMITADA                               | Chile       
|Alvarion S.A.                                         | Argentina   
|Alvarion Costa Rica S.A                               | Costa Rica  
|Tadipol-ECI Sp.z.o.o                                  | Poland      
|Alvarion SARL                                         | France      
|Alvarion De Mexico SA                                 | Mexico      
|Alvarion Inc                                          | USA         
|Alvarion UK Ltd.                                      | UK          
|Alvarion Srl                                          | Romania     
|Alvarion Asia Pacific Ltd.                            | Hong Kong   
|Alvarion do Brazil Telecomunicacoes Ltda.             | Brasil      
|Alvarion Japan KK                                     | Japan       
|Alvarion Telsiz Sistemleri A.S.                       | Turkey      
|Alvarion Israel (2003) Ltd.                           | Israel      
|Alvarion Mobile Inc.                                  | USA         
|Interwave Communications International SA             | France      
|Alvarion Spain SL                                     | Spain       
|Alvarion Philippines                                  | Philippines 
|Kermadec Telecom B.V.                                 | Holland     
|Alvarion Uruguay SA                                   | Uruguay     
|Alvarion Singapore PTE LTD                            | Singapore   
|Alvarion South Africa (Pty) Ltd                       | South Africa
|Alvarion BWA Wireless Solutions India Private Limited | India       
|Alvarion del Ecuadr S.A.                              | Ecuador     
|Alvarion Chile LIMITADA                               | Chile       
|Alvarion S.A.                                         | Argentina   
|Alvarion Costa Rica S.A                               | Costa Rica  
|Alvarion Italy SRL                                    | Italy       

*Alvarion SARL is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Alvarion UK LTD.

** Alvarion Telsiz Sistemleri
Ticaret A. S. and Alvarion - Tadipol - ECI Sp.zoo are wholly owned subsidiaries of
Kermadec Telecom B.V.



---

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Laguna Construction Company, Inc. 

Under Contract No. FA8903-04-D-8690 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 58292 

Carolyn Callaway, Esq. 

Carolyn Callaway, P.C. 

Albuquerque, NM 

Lt Col James H. Kennedy III, USAF 

Air Force Chief Trial Attorney 

William M. Lackermann, Jr. Esq. 

Senior Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

By letter dated 30 October 2014, appellant filed Appellant's Request to Withdraw 

Appeal with Prejudice. By letter dated 21November2014, the government advised that 

it did not object to a dismissal with prejudice. 

WHEREFORE, ASBCA No. 58292 is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 26 November 2014 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58292, Appeal of Laguna 

Construction Company, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief
financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the
information contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Marwan KubursiMarwan KubursiPrincipal Financial Officer




Date: March 30, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


                                   CONSENT OF
                            JOE C. NEIL & ASSOCIATES

As independent oil and gas consultants, Joe C. Neal & Associates hereby
consents to the use of our reserve report dated as of January 1, 2002, and all
references to our firm included in or made a part of the Ivanhoe Energy Inc.
Annual Report on Form 10-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about March 14, 2002.


                                  Yours truly,

                                  JOE C. NEAL & ASSOCIATES


                                  /s/ Joe C. Neal & Associates
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Joe C. Neal & Associates

                                  March 13, 2002
# cpsaat51
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd.

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Alpha ProTech, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Sheldon Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | **August 6, 2009** | ** ** | BY:    | /s/ **Sheldon Hoffman**              |
|--------|-------------------------|------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                    |       |   |                                 |
|   |                    |       |   | Sheldon Hoffman                      |
|   |                    |       |   | Chief Executive Officer and Director |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 61

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
 percentage of completion method of accounting shall be required to be 
 used with respect to contracts for the manufacture of property if no 
     payments are required to be made before the completion of the 
                     manufacture of such property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

  Mr. Ehlers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
 percentage of completion method of accounting shall be required to be 
 used with respect to contracts for the manufacture of property if no 
     payments are required to be made before the completion of the 
                     manufacture of such property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FROM PERCENTAGE OF COMPLETION METHOD FOR CERTAIN 
              MANUFACTURING CONTRACTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 460(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rule for manufacturing 
contracts) is amended by striking ``unless'' and all that follows and 
inserting ``unless--
                    ``(A) such contract involves the manufacture of--
                            ``(i) any unique item of a type which is 
                        not normally included in the finished goods 
                        inventory of the taxpayer, or
                            ``(ii) any item which normally requires 
                        more than 12 calendar months to complete 
                        (without regard to the period of the contract), 
                        and
                    ``(B) any payment for the manufacture of such item 
                is required to be made before the manufacture of such 
                item is completed.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to contracts entered into after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jeffrey A. Kupp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JEFFREY A. KUPP                                                                                   
|Jeffrey A. Kupp Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: February 28, 2008