alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Deborah A. Salerno, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of OSK Capital III Corp.;

2.         Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.         The small  business issuer's other certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

        a)         Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information  relatingto  the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

        b)         Omitted

        c)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

        d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the smallbusiness issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

        a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

        b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Exhibit 31.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, James Monroe III, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q/A of Globalstar, Inc.;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                            
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: April 9, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ James Monroe
III                       
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Executive
and Financial Officer)
NO. 07-09-0255-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL A FEBRUARY 17, 2010

__________________ ____________ TIMOTHY DAVENPORT, APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

__________________ _______________ FROM THE 316TH DISTRICT CO URT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY; NO. 10,065; HONORABLE JOHN LAGRONE, JUDGE

__________________ _____________ Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before this Court is Appellant = s Motion to Dismiss Appeal in which he requests that his notice of appeal be withdrawn and the ap peal be dismissed. As required by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appella te Procedure, the motion is signed by Appellant and his atto rney. No decision of this Court having been delivered,2 the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
Do not publish.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-40043

Feds for Medical Freedom; Local 918, American 

Federation of Government Employees; Highland 

Engineering, Incorporated; Raymond A. Beebe, Jr.; John 

Armbrust; et al.,

Plaintiffs—Appellees,

versus

Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United 

States; The United States of America; Pete Buttigieg, in 

his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation; Department of 

Transportation; Janet Yellen, in herofficial capacity as Secretary 

of Treasury; et al.,

Defendants—Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:21-CV-356

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 7, 2022, 5 Cir., 2022 , 30 F.4th 503)

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 27, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 22-40043

Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, 

Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, 

Costa, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and 

Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for 

rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judgesin regular active service 

and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en 

banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will 

specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 

5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion dated April 7, 2022, is VACATED.

2
Exhibit 31.1
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 By:
    /s/ Peter MasanottiName:
    Peter MasanottiTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2013

p0722 

# Order

Clerk July 30, 2013

146467 & (27)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MIC HIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146467

COA: 310458

Shiawassee CC: 07

- 005024

- FC

DAVID G. STUCKEY

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). T he

motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edwin Molina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/Edwin Molina



Edwin Molina,

Chief Executive Officer

March 26th, 2007
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-31.a
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>cfocertification
<DESCRIPTION>CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 302
<TEXT>


Exhibit 31(a)

CERTIFICATION


I, Mark Clancy, certify that:


> 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB\A of Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc.;
>   2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
> to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
> such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
>   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual
> report, fairly present in all material respect the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
> the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
>   4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
> Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
>   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
> information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by others,
> particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
>     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
> procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
> report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
>     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
> of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
> Evaluation Date;
>     5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
> registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
> (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
>     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
> controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
> process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
> registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
>     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
> employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
>     6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
> significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
> significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
> evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
> deficiencies and material weaknesses.
> 
> August 13, 2004
>                                  By: /s/ Mark Clancy
>                                  -----------------------------------------------
>                                   Mark Clancy, Chief Financial Officer
> 
> 
> 
> </TEXT>
> </DOCUMENT>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 564

To suspend temporarily the duty on polymer masking material for aluminum 

capacitors (UPICOAT). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on polymer masking 

material for aluminum capacitors (UPICOAT).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. POLYMER MASKING MATERIAL FOR ALUMINUM 

4 CAPACITORS (UPICOAT). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 
2

•HR 564 IH 

‘‘ 9902.34.41 Polymer masking 

material for aluminum capacitors (UPICOAT 

of 40% solute denatured polymide 

and 60% solvent 

diethyleneglycol 

dimethylethers 

(CAS No. 111–

96–6)) (provided 

for in subheading 

2909.41.00) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2005 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 7, 2013

NO. 03-12-00540-CR

Rockelle LaShawn Parker, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED --

OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in the trial court’s 

judgment, but that such error does not require the judgment be reversed: IT IS THEREFORE 

considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgment of the trial court is modified to reflect that 

Rockelle LaShawn Parker pleaded not true to paragraph A of the motion to revoke and true to 

paragraphs B, C, and D of the motion to revoke. As so modified, the judgment of the trial court 

is affirmed. It FURTHER appearing to the Court that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

July 12, 2024 SC-2024-0297 Ex parte Gary Day PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Gary Day v. State of Alabama) Pike Circuit Court: CC-99-306.64; Criminal Appeals: CR-2023-0879).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on July 12, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Wise, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Sellers, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1540

ELIZABETH CASTRO

- DE GARCIA; A.E.G.C.; MAURO GARCIA

- TORRES , Petitioners ,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of a n Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : March 14, 2023 Decided: April 25, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: Andrew Barreto , GOREN & BARRETO, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioners. Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Stephen J. Flynn, Assistant Director, Jessica R. Lesnau, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1540 Doc: 26 Filed: 04/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Elizabeth Castro

- De Garcia , Mauro Garcia

- Torres , and t heir minor child , natives
and citizens of El Salvador , petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and pro tection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidenc e supports the denial of relief, see INS v.
Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Castro

- De Garcia (B.I.A. Apr . 1 8 , 2022). We deny the emergency motion for stay pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1540 Doc: 26 Filed: 04/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Table 31. Labor force status of people 16 to 24 years old by school enrollment, sex, and educational 

attainment, October 2009

(Numbers in thousands)

Enrolled in school.............................. 21,854 8,411 38.5 7,098 32.5 1,314 15.6 13,443 

 Women........................................... 11,179 4,649 41.6 4,051 36.2 598 12.9 6,530 

 Men.............................................. 10,675 3,763 35.2 3,046 28.5 716 19.0 6,913 

 Enrolled in high school 1

..................... 9,612 2,125 22.1 1,576 16.4 548 25.8 7,488 

 Women........................................ 4,647 1,069 23.0 817 17.6 253 23.6 3,578 

 Men.............................................. 4,965 1,055 21.3 760 15.3 295 28.0 3,910 

 Enrolled in college............................. 12,242 6,287 51.4 5,521 45.1 766 12.2 5,955 

 Women........................................ 6,531 3,579 54.8 3,235 49.5 345 9.6 2,952 

 Men.............................................. 5,710 2,707 47.4 2,286 40.0 421 15.5 3,003 

Not enrolled in school....................... 15,762 12,353 78.4 9,847 62.5 2,506 20.3 3,409 

 Women........................................... 7,488 5,416 72.3 4,506 60.2 910 16.8 2,072 

 Less than a high school diploma ........ 1,299 644 49.6 444 34.2 200 31.0 655 2

Total

Percent 

of labor 

force

Characteristic

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

 Civilian labor force 

 Not in 

labor 

Total force 

Percent 

of 

population 

 Employed Unemployed 

Total

Percent 

of 

population 

 High school graduates, no college 2 ... 3,125 2,147 68.7 1,671 53.5 476 22.2 978 

 Some college or associate's degree .. 1,894 1,539 81.2 1,374 72.6 164 10.7 356 

 Bachelor’s degree and higher ............ 1,170 1,087 92.9 1,017 86.9 70 6.5 83 

 Men................................................ 8,274 6,937 83.8 5,341 64.6 1,596 23.0 1,337 

 Less than a high school diploma ........ 1,731 1,267 73.2 864 49.9 403 31.8 464 

 High school graduates, no college 2

 ... 3,870 3,193 82.5 2,400 62.0 793 24.8 677 

 Some college or associate's degree .. 1,784 1,610 90.3 1,328 74.5 282 17.5 174 

 Bachelor’s degree and higher ............ 890 867 97.4 749 84.1 118 13.6 23 

1 Includes a small number of people enrolled in grades below high school.

2 Includes high school diploma or equivalent.

NOTE: Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not equal totals.

SOURCE: October 2009 School Enrollment Supplement to the Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S.

Bureau of Labor Statistics.

86