alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 711

For the relief of Johanna Bell. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2003

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Johanna Bell.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, OR 

4 DENIAL OF ADMISSION TO, JOHANNA BELL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 

6 212(a)(6)(C)(ii) and 237(a)(3)(D) of the Immigration and 

7 Nationality Act, Johanna Bell may not be removed from 

8 the United States or denied admission to the United 

9 States by reason of any criminal offense that is reflected 

10 in the records of the Immigration and Naturalization 

11 Service of the Department of Justice, the Visa Office of 
2

•HR 711 IH 

1 the Department of State, or the Department of Homeland 

2 Security on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

3 (b) RESCISSION OF OUTSTANDING ORDER OF RE4 MOVAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Security or the At5 torney General, as appropriate, shall rescind any out6 standing order of removal, or any finding of inadmis7 sibility, that has been entered against Johanna Bell by 

8 reason of any offense described in subsection (a). Any 

9 such offense shall not be taken into account in deter10 mining whether Johanna Bell is eligible to receive a visa 

11 or whether the status of Johanna Bell may be adjusted 

12 to that of an alien lawfully admitted to the United States 

13 for permanent residence.

Æ
|   | (a) | our periodic report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and our results of operations. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Gerald D. Schiefelbein |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Gerald D. Schiefelbein     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer    |
|   |                       |
| Date:  | March 17, 2014             |

----
Order entered January 4, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00608 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 00609 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 00610 - CR BRANDON RASHAD BURTO N, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF T EXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s. F 17 - 00846 - U , F17 - 55788 - U & F16 - 51151 - U 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 2, 2019 second motion for an extension of time to file a ppe llant’s brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER the brief filed no later than February 1 , 2019 . Appellant is cautioned that the failure to file a brief by that date may result in these appeal s being abated for the trial court to make findings in accor dance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(b)(2 ).

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00538-CR

IN RE Juan Jose SANTIAGO VILLALOBOS, et al.

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Concurring Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 26, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On May 23, 2023, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relators also filed a 

motion to stay, which this court granted on May 24, 2023. We requested responses from the trial 

court and real party in interest. None were filed.

After considering the petition and this record, this court concludes relators are not entitled 

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The stay imposed on May 24, 2023 is lifted.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 31577, styled State of Texas v. Juan Jose Santiago Villalobos, and Cause 

No. 31941, styled State of Texas v. Alexandra Lizeth Ayala Ortega, pending in the County Court, Maverick County, 

Texas, the Honorable Susan D. Reed presiding.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony Cella, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on form 10-KSB of RDC International, Inc.

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:

     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "evaluation date"); and
     C) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on our  evaluation as of the
evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: December 29,
2003


/s/ Anthony Cella
---------------------------------------
Anthony Cella
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent)
# Mass Layoffs (Monthly)

"The Mass Layoffs (MMLS) release provides data on layoff actions involving 50 or more individuals from a single employer filing initial claims for unemployment insurance during a consecutive 5-week period, regardless of the duration of the layoffs. BLS reports on the number of layoff events and the number of initial claims by month, by industry, by region of the country, and by state. The data are released monthly. For more information, visit www.bls.gov/mls/"

- In May, 1,301 mass layoff actions affected 127,821 workers
- In April, 1,199 mass layoff actions affected 116,849 workers
- In March, 1,337 mass layoff actions affected 127,939 workers
- In February, 1,422 mass layoff actions affected 135,468 workers
- In January, 1,328 mass layoff actions affected 134,026 workers
- In December, 1,509 mass layoff actions affected 137,839 workers
- In November, 1,759 mass layoff actions affected 173,558 workers
- In October, 1,360 mass layoff actions affected 131,173 workers
- In September, 1,316 mass layoff actions affected 122,462 workers
- In August, 1,267 mass layoff actions affected 127,454 workers
- In July, 1,340 mass layoff actions affected 137,420 workers
- In June, 1,317 mass layoff actions affected 131,406 workers
Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF   Document 111    Filed 04/18/12   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 6211

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF   Document 111    Filed 04/18/12   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 6212
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report on Form 10-Q of Viad Corp for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Viad Corp.
 Date: August 9, 2011
By

    /s/ Paul B. DykstraPaul B. DykstraChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Ben Franklin Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Steven Sjogren, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2008                
|                                     
|/s/ C. Steven Sjogren                
|C. Steven Sjogren                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
# Cranes

Fatal occupational injuries involving cranes, 2011-2017 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries involving cranes, 2011-2017		

Fatal occupational injuries involving cranes, 2011-2017 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries involving cranes, 2011-2017		

Page &P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1266
LARRY C. WELDON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-59-2-BO-2) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 18, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry C. Weldon, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Raleigh Ellisen, Janet A.Bradley, Theodore M. Doolittle, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order awarding summary judgment to the United States in this quiet title action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Weldon v. United States , No. CA-95-59-2-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K/A of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James A. Fontaine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JAMES A. FONTAINE                                                                
|James A. Fontaine Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: January 22, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 742 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 742

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the age for receipt of 
      military retired pay for non-regular service from 60 to 55.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2003

   Mr. Saxton (for himself, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Miller of 
Florida, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. Turner of Texas, Ms. McCollum, 
Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. Holden, Mr. Simmons, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. 
 LoBiondo, Mr. Osborne, Mr. Filner, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mrs. 
    Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Foley, Mr. 
 Rodriguez, Mr. Burr, Mr. Boozman, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Hoeffel, Mrs. Jo 
   Ann Davis of Virginia, Mr. Crenshaw, and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the age for receipt of 
      military retired pay for non-regular service from 60 to 55.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN AGE FOR RECEIPT OF MILITARY RETIRED PAY FOR 
              NON-REGULAR SERVICE.

    (a) Reduction in Age.--Section 12731(a)(1) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``at least 60 years of age'' and 
inserting ``at least 55 years of age''.
    (b) Application to Existing Provisions of Law or Policy.--With 
respect to any provision of law, or of any policy, regulation, or 
directive of the executive branch, that refers to a member or former 
member of the uniformed services as being eligible for, or entitled to, 
retired pay under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, but for 
the fact that the member or former member is under 60 years of age, 
such provision shall be carried out with respect to that member or 
former member by substituting for the reference to being 60 years of 
age a reference to the age in effect for qualification for such retired 
pay under section 12731(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended 
by subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the first day of the first month beginning on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to retired pay 
payable for that month and subsequent months.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 124-2 Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2864
Case 3:11-cv-03788-FLW-LHG Document 124-2 Filed 04/25/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2865
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 Tennessee Valley Authority (Meeting No. 09-04).

# Time and Date:

 3 p.m., July 21, 2009. TVA West Tower Auditorium, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, TN.

# Status:

 Open.

## Agenda

### Action on the following New Business

1. Selection of Senior Vice President, Communications.

2. Kingston Report.

# For more information:

 Please call TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. People who plan to attend the meeting and have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who wishes to comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

Dated: July 14, 2009.

Maureen H. Dunn,

General Counsel and Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-17141 Filed 7-15-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 03-13-00760-CR OFFENSE: 36.06

James Arthur Brown v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Travis

721-ff

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 331st District Court

DATE:05/12/15 Publish: NO TCCASE#: D-l-DC-13-300630

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

James Arthur Brown v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#: I jW^/fl

PRO S£ Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

^gFLK&l) JUDGE:

DATE: O^lu/zfltr SIGNED: PC:

JUDGE: n,QA CjaAsS~- PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Cape Fox Professional Services, LLC Under Contract No. N00244-08-C-0032 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60595

Ronald L. Fouse, Esq. Edwin 0. Childs Jr., Esq.

McGuireWoods LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Robert L. Duecaster, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Chantilly, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 27 January 2017 

# ffedLrift_ MARK N. STEMPLER Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60595, Appeal ofCape Fox Professional Services, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### Fontina Sale et al., Appellants, v Gary Lee et al., Respondents.

[853 NYS2d 888]

Under the circumstances of this case, the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs did not establish, as a matter of law, that the injured plaintiff was free from comparative negligence *(see Thoma v Ronai,*82 NY2d 736, 737 [1993]; *Cator v Filipe,*47 AD3d 664 [2008]; *Albert v Klein,*15 AD3d 509, 510 [2005]; *Valore*
      *855
      *v McIntosh, 8*AD3d 662 [2004]). Since the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden as the movants, we need not review the sufficiency of the defendants’ opposition papers *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *Valore v McIntosh, 8*AD3d 662 [2004]). Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Santucci and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2185

CHRISTOPHER H. GORDON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

BREWER K. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

KYLE L. DONIFF; EDWARD PRIMOFF; SLOCUM & BODDIE PC; ALIAREZA 

ALIASKARI; DARIA LAND GROUP LLC; ROBERT H. HILLMAN; MAGAZINE 

& HILLMAN PC; SHEA HICKMAN, Tenants; SUZANNE GORDON, 

Tenants; RICHARD FRANK BODDIE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08-

cv-02802-RWT)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher H. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Frank Boddie, 

SLOCUM & BODDIE, PC, Springfield, Virginia; Robert H. Hillman, 

MAGAZINE & HILLMAN, PC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees; 
2

Suzanne Gordon, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Christopher H. Gordon appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a 

claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Gordon v. Doniff, No. 8:08-cv-02802-RWT (D. Md. 

Sept. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
  "Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated
  January 14, 1999, in the Registration Statement and related
  Prospectus of the PaineWebber Pathfinders Trust, Treasury
  and Growth Stock Series 19
  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
  New York, New York
  January 26, 1999
J

- S70023

- 14

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

– SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

JAMIE KIRNON

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1028 EDA 2014

Appeal from the PCRA Order March 5, 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 51

- CR

- 0503741

- 2001

BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., MUNDY, J., and STRASSBURGER, J.*
FILED DECEMBER 12, 2014

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY STRASSBURGER, J.:

I join the Majority Memorandum. I write separately to note that

Appellant filed his PCRA petition on June 2, 2011. The record shows that the

PCRA Inta ke Unit reviewed it on June 22, 2011. However, the PCRA court

did not issue a Pa.R.Crim.P. 907 notice until September 24, 2013, more than

two years later. Such a long delay raises serious questions about whether

justice is being served.