alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
7 5

Table 33. Labor force status of 2004 high school graduates and 2003-04 high school dropouts 16 to 24 years old

by school enrollment and sex, October 2004

(Numbers in thousands)

Total, 2004 high school graduates............. 2,752 1,533 55.7 1,282 46.6 251 16.4 1,219

 Women.................................................. 1,425 768 53.9 636 44.6 132 17.2 657

 Men....................................................... 1,327 764 57.6 645 48.6 119 15.6 562

 Enrolled in college.................................... 1,835 821 44.8 712 38.8 109 13.3 1,013

 Women................................................ 1,020 475 46.6 420 41.1 55 11.6 545

 Men..................................................... 815 347 42.6 293 35.9 54 15.6 468

 Not enrolled in college................................ 918 711 77.5 569 62.1 142 20.0 206

 Women................................................ 406 294 72.4 217 53.5 77 26.2 112

 Men..................................................... 512 418 81.6 353 68.9 65 15.6 94

Total, 2003-04 high school dropouts1 496 267 53.7 160 32.3 106 39.9 229

 Women................................................ 218 100 45.9 61 28.1 39 38.9 118

 Men..................................................... 278 166 59.9 99 35.6 67 40.4 112

 Not in 

labor 

force Total Percent of 

population Total 

Characteristic Percent of 

population Total 

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

 Civilian labor force 

 Employed Unemployed 

Percent of 

labor force

1

 Data refer to persons who dropped out of school between

October 2003 and October 2004.

NOTE: Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not

equal totals.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 697 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 697

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
          to designate a high priority corridor in California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

    Ms. Millender-McDonald introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
          to designate a high priority corridor in California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CALIFORNIA HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDOR.

    Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 
Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2031; 109 Stat 596; 112 Stat 190) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(45) I-710 between the terminus at Long Beach, 
        California, to State Route 60 in California.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                  MEDQUIST INC.
                        RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                               AS OF AND FOR THE
                  (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                        13,780
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 21,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                     433
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              35,926
<PP&E>                                        22,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                10,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                96,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         10,814
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                    82,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  96,490
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              30,393
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 22,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,998
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,619
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,778
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,841
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,841
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.24
                                              


</TABLE>
# Fatal falls, slips, and trips, 

Fatal occupational injuries due to falls, slips, and trips, 2018 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries due to falls, slips, and trips, 2018		

Fatal occupational injuries due to falls, slips, and trips, 2018 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries due to falls, slips, and trips, 2018		

Page &P
# RoadCon PR

Fatal occupational injuries at road construction sites in Puerto Rico, 2003-18 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries at road construction sites in Puerto Rico, 2003-18		

Fatal occupational injuries at road construction sites in Puerto Rico, 2003-18 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries at road construction sites in Puerto Rico, 2003-18		

Page &P
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 11.1

                             SUNPHARM CORPORATION
                        CALCULATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                                 (UNAUDITED)


FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:

                        # Days
    Total Shares     Outstanding
    ------------     -----------
      5,537,165   x         2     =     11,074,330 
      5,607,471   x        76     =    426,167,796 
      5,672,471            13           73,742,123 
                           --          ----------- 
                           91          510,984,249 DIVIDED BY 91 = 5,615,212

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:

                        # Days
    Total Shares     Outstanding
    ------------     -----------
      2,884,535   x        80     =    230,762,800 
      2,934,535   x        11     =     32,279,885 
                           --          ----------- 
                           91          263,042,685 DIVIDED BY 91 = 2,890,579

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:

                        # Days
    Total Shares     Outstanding
    ------------     -----------
      3,708,879   x        87     =    322,672,473
      5,537,165   x         5     =     27,685,825
      5,607,471   x        76     =    426,167,796
      5,672,471   x        13           73,742,123
                          ---          -----------
                          181          850,268,217 DIVIDED BY 181 = 4,697,614

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:

                        # Days
    Total Shares     Outstanding
    ------------     -----------
      2,884,535   x       171     =    493,255,485 
      2,934,535   x        11     =     32,279,885 
                          ---          ----------- 
                          182          525,535,370 DIVIDED BY 182 = 2,887,557
ALASKA HAWAII

Unemployment rate

6.0% or more

5.0% to 5.9%

4.0% to 4.9%

3.0% to 3.9%

2.9% or below

D.C.

West

North Central Mountain

East

North Central

Middle

Atlantic

New England

South

Atlantic

East

South Central

West

South Central

Pacific

WASH.

ORE.

NEV.

CALIF.

IDAHO

MONT.

WYO.

UTAH

COLO.

N.D.

S.D.

NEB.

KAN.

ARIZ.

N.M.

TEXAS

OKLA.

ARK.

LA.

MISS.

TENN.

MO.

ILL.

MINN.

IOWA

WIS.

MICH.

IND. OHIO

KY.

N.Y.

PA.

W.VA. VA.

N.C.

S.C.

GA.

FLA.

ALA.

VT.

N.H.

MAINE

#

MASS.

#

CONN.

#

N.J.

#

DEL. #

MD.

#

R.I.

Chart 1-3. In 2006, unemployment rates were lowest in the 

Mountain States and highest in the East North Central States

NOTE: Data are 2006 annual averages.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

• In 2006, Hawaii recorded the lowest unemployment rate among the states, at 

2.4 percent. Utah had the next lowest rate (2.9 percent), followed closely by 

Nebraska and Virginia (3.0 percent each).

• The highest unemployment rates were reported in Michigan (6.9 percent), 

Mississippi (6.8 percent), Alaska (6.7 percent), and South Carolina (6.5 

percent).

• In 2006, eight states registered the lowest annual jobless rates in their series 

(which began in 1976): Alabama (3.6 percent), Florida (3.3 percent), Idaho 

(3.4 percent), Louisiana (4.0 percent), Montana (3.2 percent), New Mexico (4.2 

percent), Utah (2.9 percent), and West Virginia (4.9 percent). 

Chart 1-3. In 2006, unemployment rates were lowest in the 

Mountain States and highest in the East North Central States
# stalt-table-b
----

----

| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  December      12, 2008 | By: /s/ ALBERT      AIMERS   |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                    | Albert      Aimers           |
|                                    | Chief      Executive Officer |
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**RULE
      13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
      AND**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Eugene Science, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Seung
      Kwon Noh, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
                April 17, 2007
            
            /s/
                Seung Kwon NohSeung
                Kwon NohPresident
                & Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
      under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall
      not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934.
Dionisio G. Torres d/b/a

Torres Design & Construction,

Torres Design & Construction,

Inc., and Torres

Construction Appellant/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 20, 2014

N o. 04-12-00522-CV

Dionisio G. TORRES d/b/a Torres Design & Construction, Torres Design & Construction, Inc.,

and Torres Construction,

Appellants

v.

Leticia HAYNES,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CVF001094-D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The appellant’s “Motion for Leave to File Motion for Sanctions and A Reply to

Appellee’s Response” is GRANTED. The appellant’s motion for sanctions is DENIED.

lec

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 1685 Lower Tribunal No. 2021

- CF

- 004602

- A

- O

_____________________________ J ONATHAN C HRISTIAN S UAZOCANDIA , Appellant ,

v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Elaine A. Barbour , Judge.
March 5, 2024

PER CURIAM

.
AFFIRMED

.
NARDELLA , WOZNIAK and SMITH , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Nicholas Martino, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Businesses invest in capital to produce 

goods and provide services. Capital

includes computers, machines, 

buildings, inventories, land, and 

intellectual property (software, 

research and development, and artistic 

originals like music and art). These 

are also known as “capital input” in 

estimates of total factor productivity.

For example, in a bakery you need a 

variety of capital:

• Building—structural capital

• Oven—equipment capital

• Family recipe for the cookies—

intellectual property

• Flour and frozen dough—inventory

Glossary

Capital — The tools (equipment, structures, 

inventories, land, intellectual property, etc.) 

used to produce goods and services.

Capital investment — The payments made 

to purchase or rent capital assets.

Total factor productivity — The efficiency at 

which combined inputs are used to produce 

output of goods and services.

Economics Made Easy

What is Capital?

Did you know?

Financial capital is not considered 

capital in the measurement of total 

factor productivity. This removes 

investor decisions and focuses on 

production decisions.

DIY Data

BLS produces various capital measures for different asset types and industries 

within the U.S. economy. You can explore capital investment data by visiting 

bls.gov/productivity/tables/.

Capital helps businesses and workers produce things more efficiently. This can reduce 

the cost of goods and services and have other positive effects on productivity growth. 

Capital makes up about 40 percent of total production costs in the economy. Capital 

accumulates over time as investments from previous years are used in future years.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics • bls.gov | @BL
# 2013-17

Fatal falls from roofs to roofers, 2013-17 - continued		

Fatal falls from roofs to roofers, 2013-17		

Fatal falls from roofs to roofers, 2013-17 - continued		

Fatal falls from roofs to roofers, 2013-17		

Page &P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 546 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 546

To revise the boundary of the Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical Park 
            in the State of Hawaii, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

  Mr. Case (for himself and Mr. Abercrombie) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To revise the boundary of the Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical Park 
            in the State of Hawaii, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical 
Park Addition Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO KALOKO-HONOKOHAU NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    Section 505(a) of Public Law 95-625 (16 U.S.C. 396d(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) In order'' and inserting ``(a)(1) In 
        order'';
            (2) by striking ``1978,'' and all that follows and 
        inserting ``1978.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
            ``(2) The boundaries of the park are modified to include 
        lands and interests therein comprised of Parcels 1 and 2 
        totaling 2.14 acres, identified as `Tract A' on the map 
        entitled `Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical Park Proposed 
        Boundary Adjustment', numbered PWR (PISO) 466/82,043 and dated 
        April 2002.
            ``(3) The maps referred to in this subsection shall be on 
        file and available for public inspection in the appropriate 
        offices of the National Park Service.''.
                                 <all>
```
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40725

Summary Calendar

 

EDDIE ARNOLD LEACH, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

T.C. CHIVERS, Sergeant; C.D. KING, IV, CO; R. SMITH, IV, CO; 

J.W. CATOE; S.A. MELVIN, Major; D. GROUNDS, Warden; B.W. RODEEN,

 Assistant Warden; J. HALL, Correctional Officer at Telford Unit;

C. BECKHAM, Correctional Officer at Telford Unit; R. STANDLEY,

Senior Medical Doctor at Telford Unit; G. JOHNSON, Executive 

Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice; STATE OF TEXAS,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:01-CV-176

--------------------

December 6, 2002

Before JONES, DUHÉ, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Eddie Arnold Leach, Jr., Texas prisoner # 825037, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit without

prejudice for failure to comply with a court order, pursuant to

FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). Leach misapprehends the nature of the

district court’s dismissal and addresses his brief entirely to the
2

argument that dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative

remedies was incorrect. Leach does not make any argument regarding

the propriety of dismissal under Rule 41(b) and has thus waived the

sole ground for appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25

(5th Cir. 1993). Furthermore, Leach has not provided sufficient

information upon which we could order a remand to allow him to show

exhaustion. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, James A. Fontaine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JAMES A. FONTAINE                                                                
|James A. Fontaine Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|

Date: February 20, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36228-36229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0521]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Guidance for Clinical Trial 
Sponsors: Establishment and Operation of Clinical Trial Data Monitoring 
Committees

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Guidance for Clinical Trial 
Sponsors: Establishment and Operation of Clinical Trial Data Monitoring 
Committees'' has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Jonna Capezzuto, Office of 
Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of March 10, 2009 
(74 FR 10253), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and

[[Page 36229]]

clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, 
and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now 
approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 
0910-0581. The approval expires on June 30, 2012. A copy of the 
supporting statement for this information collection is available on 
the Internet at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: July 15, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-17330 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S