alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Injet Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31,
2004 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  March 25, 2005
[No. 21821-0-III.

Division Three.

October 27, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. James L. Gaut, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 00-1-00449-5, Gregory D. Sypolt, J., entered May 23, 2000. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, A.C.J., concurred in by Brown, J., and Baker, J. Pro Tern.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7356

JOHN GRADY MORRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; JOHN T.

HADDEN, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Butner, North Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-313-5-HC-F)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Grady Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Janice McKenzie Cole, United

States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Morris v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. CA-95-313-5-HC-F

(E.D.N.C. July 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>




                                                                 Exhibit 99.1


                    [LETTERHEAD OF THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK]



The Chase Manhattan Bank
Hicksville, NY
March 26, 2001



Management Report on Internal Control over
Servicing of Securitized Credit Card Receivables

Management of The Chase Manhattan Bank is responsible for establishing and
maintaining an effective system of internal control over servicing of
securitized credit card receivables, which is designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the proper servicing of securitized credit card receivables.
The system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct
deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal
control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or
overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system
can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to servicing of securitized
credit card receivables. Further, because of changes in conditions, the
effectiveness of an internal control system may vary over time.

Management of The Chase Manhattan Bank assessed its system of internal control
over servicing of securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2000 in
relation to criteria for effective internal control described in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
believes that, as of December 31, 2000, The Chase Manhattan Bank maintained an
effective system of internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables.

/s/ Richard Srednicki
--------------------------
Richard Srednicki
Executive Vice President
The Chase Manhattan Bank

/s/ Michael Van Praag
--------------------------
Michael Van Praag
Senior Vice President
The Chase Manhattan Bank
EX-10. (l)A



 Exhibit 10(l) A 

SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS 
 In accordance with the Instructions to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant has omitted filing Change in Control Employment Agreements by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and the
following employees as exhibits to this Form 10-K because they are substantially identical to the Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and certain employees, which is filed as Exhibit 10
(j) to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. 
 Christopher Astley 

Jonathan Bourget 

David C. Elder 

John P. Jacunski 

Debabrata Mukherjee 

Dante C. Parrini 

Martin Rapp 
 Mark
A. Sullivan 
 William T. Yanavitch II
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officerof Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)            the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

 (ii)          the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  August 9,2005
|   | By:                                                      | **/s/  Charles P. Slacik** | ** ** |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|------------|
|   | Charles P.  Slacik                                       |                       |
|   | Executive Vice  President – Chief Financial Officer | ** **                 |
|   | (Principal  Financial Officer)                           | ** **                 |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelyto accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not beingfiled for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility under the EB Program for Alaska.

The following change has occurred since the publication of the last notice regarding the State's EB status:
      - As of January 10, 2009, Alaska has completed a mandatory 13-week “off” trigger period. Based on data reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on December 19, 2008, Alaska's 3-month seasonally adjusted total unemployment rate was 7.1 percent and equals or exceeds 110 percent of the corresponding rate in both prior years. This causes Alaska to be triggered “on” to an EB period beginning January 25, 2009.

## Information for Claimants

The duration of benefits payable in the EB Program, and the terms and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an EB period, the State Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular benefits and is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)).

Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB, or who wish to inquire about their rights under the program, should contact their State Workforce Agency.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce Security, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Bldg. Room S-4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is not a toll-free number) or by e-mail:                         *gibbons.scott@dol.gov*.                    

Signed in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of January 2009.

Douglas F. Small,

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment and Training.

[FR Doc. E9-1756 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simula, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John A. Jenson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                        
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company for the periods presented.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ John A. Jenson     
| |                        
| | John A. Jenson         
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | August 14, 2003
# PF1

# PF2

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF3

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF4

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF5

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF6

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF7

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF8

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF9

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF10

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF11

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF12

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF13

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF14

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF15

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf

# PF16

https://www.bls.gov/cps/calculating-standard-errors-and-confidence-intervals.pdf
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date himself (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.




Date: January 9, 2008





/s/  Richard
      F. TusingName:
      Richard F. TusingTitle:
      Acting President, Acting Chief Executive Officer, Acting Principal
      Executive Officer,  Chief Financial
      Officer,  Principal Financial Officer and
    Director





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7081
LEE DON SHEPHERD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus BRIAN A. BLEDSOE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-76) Submitted: August 24, 2001 Decided: September 5, 2001 Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lee Don Shepherd, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lee Don Shepherd appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shepherd v. Bledsoe , No. CA-01-76 (N.D.W. Va. June 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Bank of the Carolinas Corporation (the
Registrant) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                        |  |                                               
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Robert E. Marziano                        
|                        |  | Robert E. Marziano                            
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer         
|                        | 
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Michelle L. Clodfelter                    
|                        |  | Michelle L. Clodfelter                        
|                        |  | Vice President and Principal Financial Officer
SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 6-3. Labor force participation rates have increased 

dramatically among mothers over the past 30 years

47

55

45

34

71

77

68

59

0

20

40

60

80

100

Under 18 years 6 to 17 3 to 5 Under 3 years

 March 1975 March 2005

Age of youngest child

Percent

Chart 6-3. Labor force participation rates have increased 

dramatically among mothers over the past 30 years

• In 2005, about 7 out of 10 mothers were labor force participants. In 1975, 

about 5 out of 10 were working or looking for work. 

• In 2005, participation rates ranged from 59 percent for mothers whose 

youngest child was under 3 years old to 77 percent for those whose youngest 

child was 6 to 17.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 06-0544 

IN RE PETITION OF MARY CLAIRE TRIMBLE 

FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS 

IN THE BAR OF MONTANA 

FILE 

MAY 0 2 2023 

Bowen Oreenwood O R otaf Supreme Cala 

o of Montana 

Mary Claire Trimble has petitioned for reinstatement to active status in the State 

Bar of Montana. However, there are requirements under the Rules of Admission that must 

be satisfied before we can approve placing Trimble on active status. 

Trimble was notified by the State Bar Admissions Administrator on December 3, 

2021, that Trimble had completed eligibility requirements for admission by Uniform Bar 

Examination score transfer. The letter advised Trimble that "Pie Montana Rules of 

Admission require that you present yourself for admission within one year from the date 

of this notice." However, Trimble did not thereafter move for admission. Thus, Trimble 

has never been admitted to the State Bar, including signing the oath and the roll of 

attorneys, and has not been listed as a member of the State Bar. Rule X(B) of the Rules of 

Admission provides that, "[i]f an applicant does not appear for admission to the State Bar 

of Montana within one year after successfully meeting the requirements for admission, the 

applicant's application will be terminated and the applicant may be admitted only after 

reapplication as provided in these Rules." It appears Trimble did, for masons unknown, 

pay the annual bar membership fee for 2022, despite never being admitted. 

To finish the admissions process, Trimble must petition the Court for admission, 

submitting the certification from the Bar Admissions Administrator that Trimble has 

satisfied all admissions requirements. Given the expiration of the one-year period in which 

to do so, Trimble must also request that the Court waive Rule X(B) by providing an 

explanation about why the process was not completed within one year. Therefore, 

05/02/2023

Case Number: PR 06-0544
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Mary Claire Trimble for 

reinstatement to active status in the State Bar of Montana is DENIED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE to Trimble's completion of the adrnission process, as provided herein. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this day of May, 2023. 

2 

Chief Justice 

Justices
EXHIBIT 1.1

Version as of August 2001

Articles of Association    of    Infineon Technologies AG

I.    General Provisions

§ 1Company Name, Registered Place of Business and Fiscal Year

§ 2Object of the Enterprise

§ 3Announcements

Announcements
of the company shall be made by publication in the Federal Gazette.

II.    Share Capital and Shares

§ 4Amount and Division of the Share Capital

---







2

---



III.    The Management Board

§ 5Composition and Rules of Procedure



IV.    Supervisory Board

§ 6Composition, Term of Office, Resignation from Office

3

---

§ 7Chairman, Deputy Chairman

§ 8Committees of the Supervisory Board

To
the extent to which statute or the articles of association permit, the supervisory board can transfer its duties and rights to its chairman, to individual members or to committees formed from its
midst. If the chairman of the supervisory board belongs to a committee and if there is a tie in the voting of the committee, then hebut not his deputyhas two votes if voting
is carried out a second time and once again ends in a tie.

§ 9Convocation and Passing of the Resolutions

4

---

§ 10Duties and Powers of the Supervisory Board

§ 11Remuneration

5

---



V.    General Meeting of the Shareholders

§ 12Ordinary General Meeting of theShareholders

The
ordinary general meeting of the shareholders shall take place within the first eight months of the fiscal year. Its agenda shall include regularly

§ 13Place and Convocation

§ 14Conditions for Participation and the Exercise of Voting Rights

Shareholders
are entitled to participate in the general meeting of the shareholders, and to exercise their voting rights, if they are entered in the company's share register and have given
notification of attendance for the meeting in good time. The notification of attendance shall be made to the management board at the company's registered place of business either in writing or by
facsimile or by means of electronic communication to be determined by the company. The notification of attendance

6

---

must be received at least six full days before the date of the general meeting. The management board may specify a shorter deadline for receipt in the notice of convocation of the general meeting.
Details of the notification of attendance shall be published together with the notice of convocation in the relevant publications specified in the Articles of Association.

§ 15Direction and Course

§ 16Voting Right

7

---



§ 17Passing Resolutions

VI.    Annual Financial Statements and Appropriation of Profits

§ 18Annual Financial Statements

§ 19Appropriation of Profits

8

---

§ 20Determination of Contributions in Kind

9

---





§ 21Costs of Formation

The
company bears the costs of incorporation (notary's and registration fees as well as costs of publication), estimated at DM 100,000.

10

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
    /s/  Bryan McGuireName:
    Bryan McGuireTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    February 8, 2010