alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VII 

Private Calendar No. 3 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 712 

[Report No. 108–530] 

For the relief of Richi James Lesley. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2003 

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 8, 2004 

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

For the relief of Richi James Lesley. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR RICHI 

4 JAMES LESLEY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Richi James Lesley shall be eligible for issuance of 

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 
2 

•HR 712 RH 

1 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

2 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

3 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status 

4 to lawful permanent resident. 

5 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Richi James Les6 ley enters the United States before the filing deadline 

7 specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have 

8 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi9 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

10 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

11 the enactment of this Act. 

12 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

13 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap14 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica15 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

16 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

18 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res19 idence to Richi James Lesley, the Secretary of State shall 

20 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur21 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im22 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

23 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

24 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

25 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 
3 

•HR 712 RH 

1 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

2 202(e) of such Act. 

3 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

4 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

5 parents, brothers, and sisters of Richi James Lesley shall 

6 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

7 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act. 
Private Calendar No. 3 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 712 

[Report No. 108

–530] 

A BILL 

For the relief of Richi James Lesley. 

JUNE 8, 2004 

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 752,056
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4,068,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (558,095)
<INVENTORY>                                          3,514,949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     8,325,483
<PP&E>                                               3,304,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (652,568)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      11,923,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                6,280,282
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                               202,525
<OTHER-SE>                                           4,897,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        11,923,969
<SALES>                                             13,413,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    13,613,400
<CGS>                                                7,593,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5,562,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       165,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (323,751)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        299,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    299,041
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           299,041
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.02



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 11
                                ADE CORPORATION
           Statements Regarding Computation of Net Income Per Share

                     (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Three months ended
                                                                  July 31,
                                                           ---------------------
                                                                 1997   1996 
                                                                 (unaudited)
<S>                                                          <C>     <C>
Net income                                                      $3,883  $2,548
                                                                ======  ======
Weighted average common and common   
  equivalent shares outstanding:
 
          a. Shares attributable to common stock outstanding     8,617   8,443
 
          b. Shares attributable to common stock options
                pursuant to APB 15                                 507     421
 
Weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares outstanding                                  9,124   8,864
                                                                ======  ======

Net income per share                                            $ 0.43  $ 0.29
                                                                ======  ======
</TABLE>
Unemployment rates for metropolitan areas, 

2023 annual averages

(U.S. rate = 3.6 percent)

Map includes data for 389 metropolitan areas based

on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 18-03. 

Areas in the six New England states are Metropolitan 

New England City and Town areas (NECTAs), while

areas in other states are county-based.

NOTE:

Above U.S. average

U.S. average or below
# table14afull20

&8Page &P of &N
Exhibit 10.1


INDEPENDENCE BANCSHARES, INC.


2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 ADOPTED BY THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS 


FEBRUARY 27, 2013


 


First, the Board amended Section 5.1 of the Plan by deleting
Article V, Section 5.1 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:


 


5.1Limitations. The maximum
number of shares that may be issued hereunder shall be 2,466,720. The total number of shares of Stock issuable pursuant to Incentive
Stock Options is 260,626 (other than pursuant to antidilution adjustments). Any or all shares of Stock subject to the Plan may
be issued in any combination of Incentive Stock Options or non-Incentive Stock Options. Shares subject to an Option may be either
authorized and unissued shares or shares issued and later acquired by the Company. The shares covered by any unexercised portion
of an Option that has terminated for any reason (except as set forth in the following paragraph) may again be optioned under the
Plan, and such shares shall not be considered as having been optioned or issued in computing the number of shares of Stock remaining
available for option hereunder.


 


If Options are issued in
respect of options to acquire stock of any entity acquired, by merger or otherwise, by the Company (or any Subsidiary of the Company),
to the extent that such issuance shall not be inconsistent with the terms, limitations and conditions of Code Section 422 or Rule
16b-3 under the Exchange Act, the aggregate number of shares of Stock for which Options may be granted hereunder shall automatically
be increased by the number of shares subject to the Options so issued; provided, however, that the aggregate number of shares of
Stock for which Options may be granted hereunder shall automatically be decreased by the number of shares covered by any unexercised
portion of an Option so issued that has terminated for any reason, and the shares subject to any such unexercised portion may not
be optioned to any other person.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this
Amendment No. 2 to the Plan to be executed as of February 27, 2013 in accordance with the authority provided by the Board of Directors.


 


Independence Bancshares, Inc.


 


 


 


By: /s/ Gordon A. Baird


Gordon A. Baird


Chief Executive Officer


 

 
5
[No. 22845-2-III.

Division Three.

November 22, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kennith E. Durfee, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 02-1-02520-1, Kathleen M. O’Connor, J., entered February 19, 2004. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Kato, C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Brown, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Ellen M. Ingersoll, Chief Financial
Officer of Viad Corp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | the report on Form 10-Q of Viad Corp for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viad Corp.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 8, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | By: /s/ Ellen M. Ingersoll
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Ellen M. Ingersoll        
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Filed 6/2/16 P. v. Rosenthal CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

 Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CYNTHIA JILL ROSENTHAL,

 Defendant and Appellant.

2d. Crim. No. B267880

(Super. Ct. No. 2013006221)

(Ventura County)

Appellant Cynthia Jill Rosenthal appeals an August 18, 2015 order 

revoking and terminating probation and sentencing her to eight months in prison. (Pen. 

Code, § 1203.3, subd. (a).)1 

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel’s 

examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.

On March 28, 2016, we advised appellant that she had 30 days within 

which to personally submit any contentions or issues she wished us to consider. We have 

received no response from appellant.

The record reflects that appellant pled guilty to identity theft (§ 530.5, 

subd. (a)) on February 26, 2013, and was granted 36 months probation. On March 28, 

2014, appellant admitted violating probation and probation was reinstated. On 

 

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.
2

August 14, 2015, the trial court found appellant violated probation for failing to report to 

probation and submit to drug testing, using drugs, leaving a residential treatment program 

and failing to report, failing to pay restitution, and driving under the influence. It revoked 

and terminated appellant’s probation. On August 18, 2015, the trial court sentenced 

appellant to eight months in state prison, plus a consecutive sentence of two years in a 

second case for burglary (Ventura County Case No. 2012039041). We affirmed the order 

revoking and terminating probation in the burglary case. (People v. Rosenthal (May 16, 

2016, B267881) [nonpub. opn.].)

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant’s 

attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. 

(People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

TANGEMAN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

PERREN, J.
Charles W. Campbell, Jr., Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for 

Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5394 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5394

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the taxation of 
                            arrow components.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCISE TAX ON ARROWS.

    (a) Repeal.--Subsection (b) of section 332 of the American Jobs 
Creation Act of 2004, and the amendments made by such subsection, are 
hereby repealed; and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied 
as if such subsection and amendments had never been enacted.
    (b) Tax on Arrow Shafts.--Paragraph (2) of section 4161(b) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to arrows) is amended to read 
as follows:
        ``(2) Arrows.--
            ``(A) In general.--There is hereby imposed on the first 
        sale by the manufacturer, producer, or importer of any shaft 
        (whether sold separately or incorporated as part of a finished 
        or unfinished product) of a type used in the manufacture of any 
        arrow which after its assembly--
                ``(i) measures 18 inches overall or more in length, or
                ``(ii) measures less than 18 inches overall in length 
            but is suitable for use with a bow described in paragraph 
            (1)(A),
        a tax equal to 39 cents per shaft.
            ``(B) Adjustment for inflation.--
                ``(i) In general.--In the case of any calendar year 
            beginning after 2005, the 39-cent amount specified in 
            subparagraph (A) shall be increased by an amount equal to 
            the product of--

                    ``(I) such amount, multiplied by
                    ``(II) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar year, 
                determined by substituting `2004' for `1992' in 
                subparagraph (B) thereof.

                ``(ii) Rounding.--If any increase determined under 
            clause (i) is not a multiple of 1 cent, such increase shall 
            be rounded to the nearest multiple of 1 cent.''.
    (c) Arrow Points.--Clause (ii) of section 4161(b)(1)(B) (relating 
to archery equipment) of such Code is amended by striking ``quiver or 
broadhead'' and inserting ``quiver, broadhead, or point''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (b) and (c) 
shall apply to articles sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer 
after March 31, 2005.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 19

- 00553

- CV

IN RE James Clinton COYLE , Janice Presley Coyle a/k/a Janice Presley and Cody Presley

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 4, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 19, 2019, r elator s filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the

petition and the record, this court concludes relator s are not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 17

- 12

- 24620

- CV, styled Coyle Family Farm, Inc., et al. v. James Clinton

Coyle, et al. , pending in t he 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas, the Honorable H. Paul Canales

presiding.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00397

- CV
Troy Crownover v. PAA Consulting, LLC
On Appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- DCV

- 254

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered t his cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observ ance. March 17 , 2022
EXHIBIT 10.2
 (MIDQUIST LOGO)
    
    Corporate Offices
1000 Bishops Gate Blvd, Suite 300
Mount Laurel, NJ 08054-4632
  
  Company Employment Commencement
Date Employee Section 7
 Term Term
 Compensation




---



##### 



Section 5
 Long Term Incentives
 Covenants.
 Non-Solicitation
    Non-Disclosure
 -2-




---



##### 



Non-Competition
 Intellectual Property & Company Creations.
 Ownership
 Assignment
 -3-




---



##### 



Disclosure & Cooperation
 Acknowledgments
 Enforcement
    -4-




---



##### 



Section 5
 Section 4
   Section 4
 Termination provided, however Section
4(f)(2)(iii) Section
5 Section 5
 Miscellaneous
 Other Agreements
 -5-




---



##### 



Entire Agreement; Amendment
 Waiver
 Governing Law
 Severability
 Wage Claims
 Successors and Assigns
 Section Headings
 Counterparts
 Indemnification
 -6-




---



##### 



Definitions
 Business
 Cause  nolo contendere
 Covenants Section 4
  Sincerely,MedQuist Inc.By:
    /s/ Peter MasanottiPeter MasanottiPresident & CEO  /s/ Alan J. GoldAlan J. Gold
 -7-
<PAGE>   1


Exhibit 11-Computation of Earnings Per Share
         (Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Jan. 4, 1997     Dec. 30, 1995
                                             ------------     -------------  
<S>                                           <C>               <C>
Average shares
   outstanding                                13,423,671        13,921,052

Net income (loss)                             $      684        $     (124)
                                              ==========        ==========

Earnings (loss) per share
   of common stock                            $      .05        $     (.01)
                                              ==========        ==========
</TABLE>

The effect of common stock equivalents, consisting of stock options, calculated
using the treasury stock method, was not dilutive during either three-month
period.  For the three months ended December 30, 1995 the market price was
below the exercise price for all stock options. Accordingly, the effect of any
such options are not reflected during that period. For the three months ended
January 4, 1997, 288,538 common stock equivalent shares are included in the 
total for weighted average shares outstanding.


                                       10
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-39956 and 333-104705) and Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-70148 and 333-84852) ofUbiquiTel Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2006 relating to the financialstatements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

Philadelphia,Pennsylvania

April 27, 2006

 

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Albert Aimers, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Clicker, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Clicker, Inc.





By:

/s/    ALBERT AIMERSDate: January 13, 2011

Name:

Albert AimersTitle:

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer