alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered July 14 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 01375 - CV ROGER K. PARSONS, IN DIVIDUALLY AND AS IN DEPENDENT ADMINISTRA TOR FOR THE ESTATE OF ES THER ANN KARTSOTIS PARSONS, Appellant V. MICHAEL KEVIN QUEENA N AND THE QUEENAN LA W FIRM, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 15 - 00971



### O RDER By letter dated May 13, 2016, the Court was n otifi ed appellant’s attorney, Christopher Nygaard, was deceased. By order dated May 26, 2016, we directed the Clerk of the Court to remove Christopher Nygaard as attorney of record for appellant and ordered appellant to notify the Court of the name and contact information of new appellate counsel, or to inform the Court

a ppellant would be representing himself for the remainder of the appeal. On June 27, 2016, appellant filed a “notification in compliance” with out May 26, 2016 order in which appellant seeks a “sua sponte equitable bill of review.” Although difficult to ascertain, it appears appellant is , in part, contending our May 26, 2016 order was erroneous because he cannot represent the estate of Esther Ann Kartsotis Parsons because he is not licensed to practice law in Texas. Weagree with appellant he cannot represent the estate in this appeal. See Steele v. McDonald , 202

S.W.3d 926, 928 (Tex. App

— Waco 2006, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to notify the Court of the name and contact informati on of appellate counsel to represent the estate in this appeal within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. In the event appellant fails to provide the Court with the requ ired information, the appeal will proceed with appellant representing himself regar ding any individual claims, and any claims on behalf of the estate of Esther Ann Kartsotis Parsons will be dismissed without further notice. Because briefs in this case have been filed and the case is at issue, the case will be set for submission in due c ourse, but not within the next thirty days.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
# cpsaat32
# all worker 1992-2002

Fatal occupational injuries by selected characteristics, 1992-2002 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries by selected characteristics, 1992-2002		

Fatal occupational injuries by selected characteristics, 1992-2002 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries by selected characteristics, 1992-2002		

Page &P
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the amended quarterly report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report"), I, Arthur S.
Reynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  December
22, 2009





By:
              /s/ Arthur S. ReynoldsName:
      Arthur S. ReynoldsTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer at 10/14/2009
# 2011

# 2012

# 2013

# 2014

# 2015

# 2016

# 2017
PACTS #: 60703

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer THE HONORABLE JOSE L. L1NARES

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date of Original Sentence: 04/01/2013Original Offense: Conspiracy to Distribute Oxycodone; Possession with Intent to Distribute Oxycodone;Distribution of EcstasyOriginal Sentence: 51 months imprisonment, 36 months supervised release

Special Conditions: Special Assessment, Substance Abuse Testing, Alcohol Treatment, Drug Treatment

Type of Supervision: Supervised Release Date Supervision Commenced: 10/30/2015

NONCOMPLIANCE SUMMARY

The offender has not complied with the following condition(s) ofsupervision:Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance

1 On August 7, 2017, while undergoing drug testing, the offender tested positive

for cocaine. He admitted to recently using cocaine with a female friend over

the weekend, and he executed a drug use admission form.

U.S. Probation Officer Action:If signed and approved by the Court, the Probation Office will present this petition to the offeiider as a

formal written reprimand. Additionally, the frequency of drug testing will be increased, and he has been

referred for substance abuse counseling at Door Into the Future, Passaic, New Jersey, where he isawaiting an intake appointment. The probation office will continue to closely monitor Yahsi’s progress,and will report any further noncompliance.

Respectfully submitted,JI(wqwue6eBy: Marqwuese Bayne

U.S. Probation Officer

Date: 08/15/2017
F Other
Amendment 2012-1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.16 
 AMENDMENT 2012-1 
 TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT 2012-1 (the “Amendment”), dated as of December 14, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), is entered into by and between Antares Pharma, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), and Dr. Paul K. Wotton (“Executive”). 
 RECITALS

 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive previously entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated
November 12, 2008 (the “Existing Employment Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to
amend the Existing Employment Agreement to clarify that the actual annual bonus paid to Executive may be greater than Executive’s target annual bonus; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 11 of the Existing Employment Agreement provides that the Existing Employment Agreement may be amended pursuant to a written agreement approved by the Board of Directors of the
Company (the “Board”) and executed on its behalf by a duly authorized officer (other than Executive) and Executive. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Executive hereby agree that, subject to Board approval, effective as of the Effective Date, the Existing Employment Agreement shall be amended as follows: 

1. Section 2.2 of the Existing Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

“(b) Bonus. In addition to the Executive’s Base Salary, the Executive shall be eligible to receive a bonus for each
calendar year during the Term, based on attainment of certain individual and corporate performance goals and targets (the “Annual Bonus”). The target amount of the Executive’s Annual Bonus shall be 55% of Base Salary.
The performance goals and targets shall be determined by the Compensation Committee in consultation with the Executive. Once determined, the applicable performance goals and targets shall be communicated to the Executive as soon as reasonably
practicable following the Compensation Committee’s determination of the applicable goals and targets. The actual Annual Bonus amount paid will be based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination, in its sole discretion, whether and to
what extent the applicable performance goals and targets have been achieved, and such amount may be more or less than the target amount, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. Any Annual Bonus earned and payable to the
Executive hereunder shall be paid on or after January 1 but not later than March 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year for which the Annual Bonus is earned.” 

2. In all respects not amended, the Existing Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed. 

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, subject to Board approval, the Company and Executive agree to the terms
of the foregoing Amendment, effective as of the Effective Date. 
  

			
	ANTARES PHARMA, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Anton Gueth
	Name:	 	Anton Gueth
	Title:	 	Chairman of the Compensation Committee
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	/s/ Paul K. Wotton
	Dr. Paul K. Wotton



  
 2
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1 for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable JonathanG. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota
. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1356

___________ James E. Mooney, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. State of Minnesota, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 26, 1998 Filed: May 27, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. James E. M ooney appeals from the district court & s denial of his motion t o 1 proceedin forma pauperis and dismissal of his complaint prior to service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Liberally construing Mr. Mooney & s complaint and-2-

accepti ng his contention that he sued the Minnesota Department of Corrections an d state agents in their “official capacity,” we conclude his action requesting declaratory relief for conduct that occurred over thirty-five years earlier wa s barred by the Eleventh Amendment. See Puerto Rico Aque duct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. , 506 U. S. 139, 146 (1993); Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman , 465 U.S. 89, 99- 100 (1984). Accordingly, we affirm the judg ment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
I, Jerry R. Engle, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of First Shares Bancorp, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation;and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial datainformation; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2004                                                     /s/  Jerry R. Engle   Jerry R. Engle   Chief Executive Officer
NOTE: Shaded area represents recession. Data are seasonally adjusted. 

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Employment in thousands

106,000

107,000

108,000

109,000

110,000

111,000

112,000

113,000

114,000

115,000

116,000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

106,000

107,000

108,000

109,000

110,000

111,000

112,000

113,000

114,000

115,000

116,000

Chart 1-7. Private payroll employment has increased since 

August 2003

Chart 1-7. Private payroll employment has increased since 

August 2003

• Private nonfarm employment fell sharply during 2001. The pace of 

employment declines slowed markedly in 2002. 

• Private payroll employment has increased since August 2003. By December 

2006, about 6.8 million private sector jobs had been added.
ACCEPTED 14-14-00896-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/16/2015 3:49:32 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rackspace Hosting, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Bruce R. Knooihuizen , as Principal Financial Officer of Rackspace Hosting, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rackspace Hosting, Inc.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: February 26, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Bruce R. Knooihuizen                                                                  
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Bruce R. Knooihuizen                                                                      
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 13****CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Infineon Technologies AG (the “Company”)for the annual period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Wolfgang Ziebart, as Member of the Management Boardand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter J. Fischl, as Member of the Management Boardand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     This certification will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certificationwill not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of New Green Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K  for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Craig Huffman, Acting Chief Executive
Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May
      8,
      2009
                By:
                /s/ Craig
      HuffmanName:
      Craig HuffmanTitle: 
      Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of New
      Green Technologies, Inc
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hassan Hans Badreddine, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      first quarter ended July 31, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      

|By:    | /s/ Hassan Hans Badreddine                              
|------ | --------------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Hassan Hans Badreddine                                  
|Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer and
      Director
|       | (Principal Executive Officer)                           
|Date:  | September 20, 2010                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60546

Summary Calendar

BARRACK JUMA OCHONDO,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A72 426 558 

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Barrack Juma Ochondo, a citizen and native of Kenya,

petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeal’s (BIA) order affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ) order

denying his requests for asylum, withholding of removal,

cancellation of removal, and withholding of removal under the

Convention Against Torture and final order of removal. When, as

here, the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s

decision. See Mikhael v. INS, 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997).
No. 06-60546

-2-

Ochondo argues that the IJ and BIA erred by denying his

request for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229b(b)(2)(a)(i)(I) because the evidence showed that he was

abused by his United States citizen former spouse. For the first

time in this court, he asserts that the IJ’s denial of his

request for cancellation of removal violated his due process

rights.

We do not have jurisdiction to consider Ochondo’s challenge

to the IJ’s and BIA’s determination that Ochondo did not suffer

extreme cruelty. See Wilmore v. Gonzales, 455 F.3d 524, 526-28

(5th Cir. 2006). Because Ochondo did not raise his due process

claim before the BIA, we do not have jurisdiction to consider the

due process claim. See Goonsuwan v. Ashcroft, 252 F.3d 383, 389-

90 (5th Cir. 2001). In any event, relief from removal under

discretionary waiver is not entitled to due process protection. 

Nguyen v. District Director, Bureau of Immigration & Customs

Enforcement, 400 F.3d 255, 259 (5th Cir. 2005). Ochondo’s

challenges to the denial of his request for cancellation of

removal are dismissed.

Ochondo argues that the IJ erred by denying his request for

withholding of removal on the grounds that he was HIV positive,

that people with HIV are discriminated against in Kenya, and that

sufficient medical care is not available. Because Ochondo did

not show that he faced persecution from the Kenyan government or

a group or groups that the Kenyan government was unwilling or
No. 06-60546

-3-

unable to control, the IJ’s denial of Ochondo’s request for

withholding of removal was supported by substantial evidence. 

See Adebisi v. INS, 952 F.2d 910, 913-14 (5th Cir. 1992). 

Ochondo’s challenge to the denial of his request for withholding

of removal is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED IN PART, DENIED IN PART.