The BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses: A Primer 

By William J. Wiatrowski* 

Abstract 

The Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses is the nation’s primary surveillance vehicle for 

nonfatal injuries and illnesses that occur in the workplace. Based on recordable injuries and 

illnesses as defined by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the SOII provides 

annual counts and rates by industry and state for workers in private industry and state and local 

government. In addition, the SOII provides details about the most severe injuries and illnesses, 

including characteristics of the workers involved and details of the circumstances surrounding 

the incident. To accompany articles that discuss research into the completeness of SOII data, 

this commentary provides an overview of the SOII. Included is information about the history of 

capturing data on workplace injuries and illnesses, current survey processes, annual outputs, and 

an introduction to the current concerns about underreporting. 

Key words: occupational injuries; injury surveillance; survey 

*Associate Commissioner for Compensation and Working Conditions, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

Email: wiatrowski.william@bls.gov. 
2

The three articles that accompany this introduction discuss research conducted under grants from 

the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) as part of continuing efforts to identify and understand 

the potential undercount in the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII). 

Briefly, the SOII is a survey of approximately 250,000 private industry and state and local 

government establishments that, when selected, maintain a log of Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration (OSHA)-recordable workplace injuries and illnesses for one year and 

report that information to the BLS. Since 1972, the SOII has served as the nation’s primary 

source of information on non-fatal workplace injuries and illnesses, providing annual counts and 

rates and, more recently, details about the workers involved and the circumstances surrounding 

the incident. Annual SOII data can be used to track trends in workplace injuries and illnesses; 

for example, survey data reveal a significant increase during the 1990s in the share of cases that 

resulted in restricted work (i.e. light duty) rather than time away from work, especially among 

manufacturers. 

History of BLS occupational safety and health data 

Soon after it was established in 1884, the BLS began conducting studies of worker safety. These 

were largely individual industry studies, such as reports on workplace injuries in the iron and 

steel industries. With the introduction of workers’ compensation laws in the 1910s and 1920s, 

there became a de facto requirement for employers to report worker injuries as they identified 

workers’ compensation cases. The specifics of these laws varied by state and thus there were 

state to state variations in data, the result of differing definitions and details. In 1926, the BLS 

began an annual survey of the frequency and severity of industrial injuries, including fatalities, 

focused largely on manufacturing. This program ran through the early 1970s and served as the 

precursor to today’s data. More frequent data were collected during World War II, in 

recognition of the need to maintain wartime industrial production. [Drudi, 1997]

All of these early efforts suffered from concerns about employer compliance. Data collection 

was voluntary and some argued that employers were finding ways to avoid reporting, such as 

transferring employees. These concerns were recognized in development of the Occupational 

Safety and Health Act of 1970. Development of statistics was specifically identified in the OSH 
3

Act, with provisions included to help mitigate some of the concerns about the existing data 

collection effort. The Act specifies that the Secretary of Labor “ shall develop and maintain an 

effective program of collection, compilation, and analysis of occupational safety and health 

statistics...” 

The Act includes four major tenets that today form the basis for the BLS Occupational Safety 

and Health Statistics program: 

 Compile accurate statistics on work injuries and illnesses, whether or not involving 

loss of time from work, other than minor injuries requiring only first aid treatment ... 

 Cover all employments whether or not subject to any other provisions of the Act 

 Require employers to file reports 

 The program shall be a shared Federal and state program, with states required to pay 

at least 50 percent of the cost 

The first tenet, regarding the types of injuries and illnesses to be reported, is the foundation for 

OSHA recordkeeping requirements. Today, OSHA defines recordable occupational injuries and 

illnesses as those that fall into one of the following categories: 

 Death 

 Days away from work 

 Restricted work or transfer to another job 

 Medical treatment beyond first aid 

 Diagnosis of a significant injury or illness by a physician or other licenses health care 

professional. 

OSHA requires certain employers, based on industry and employment, to maintain logs of 

occupational injuries and illnesses annually, and to post those logs where employees can review 

them soon after the beginning of the year. Other employers are “partially exempt” from this 

recordkeeping requirement, except when selected by BLS for the SOII. In such cases, employers 
4

are required to maintain occupational injury and illness records for the survey year and to 

provide those records to BLS. 

The OSH Act specifically excludes small farms (those with fewer than 11 employees) from data 

collection. Data from the railroad and mining industries are obtained by BLS from the Federal 

Railway Administration and the Mine Safety and Health Administration, respectively, and are 

therefore not part of BLS data collection from employers. Except where required by State law, 

State and local governments are not required to maintain logs and submit data to the BLS. In 

these cases, survey participation is voluntary. 

Finally, the OSH Act requires Federal-state cooperation in the development and compilation of 

occupational safety and health statistics. To participate, States must provide a portion of the 

funding. In 2013, 42 States plus the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and 

Guam participated in the program. Participating agencies vary from State to State and include 

departments of labor, health, workers’ compensation, and others. In return for participating,BLS 

develops the data in ways that ensure the availability of detailed data by state. For States that do 

not participate, BLS collects worker injury and illness information from a small number of 

employers within the State to include in national estimates. 

The SOII captures and publishes data on the number and rate of occupational injuries and 

illnesses by industry, state, establishment employment size, and case type, the latter being an 

OSHA designation based on the severity of injury or illness as follows: 

 Cases involving days away from work 

 Cases involving only job transfer or restricted work 

 Other recordable case (not involving days away or job transfer) 

During the 1970s and 1980s, the BLS Occupational Safety and Health Statistics program also 

included information about the workers involved and circumstances surrounding the injury or 

illness derived from workers’ compensation data in a limited number of states, as well as some 

special reports on selected worker injuries (such as falls) obtained through employee interviews. 
5

Also during that time, the survey was the source of data on fatal work injuries. These additional 

outputs were the subject of scrutiny in the late 1980s, when several studies recommended that 

BLS revise its occupational safety and health statistics program to provide more complete data. 

[Pollack et al, 1987] These recommendations form the basis for today’s program. 

Beginning in 1992, the SOII began capturing additional data for certain occupational injury and 

illness cases identified through the survey. Known as the case and demographic data, the SOII 

now captures information on the circumstances surrounding the injury or illness (the “case”) and 

characteristics of the worker involved (the “demographics”). Since 1992, these data have been 

captured annually for all cases that resulted in days away from work, thought to be the most 

severe cases and representing nearly half of all cases in the first year of collection. Since that 

time, the share of cases resulting in only job transfer or restricted work has increased greatly; in 

certain industries like manufacturing, job transfer or restricted work is now the predominant case 

type. To address this shift in case type, BLS recently began capturing case and demographic 

data for a sample of these job transfer cases. [BLS, 2013] 

Also in 1992, BLS ended the practice of identifying fatal work injuries through the SOII. 

Because work-related fatalities are comparatively rare events, their enumeration through a 

sample survey yielded inconsistent data and likely missed many fatalities. [Pollack et al, 1987] 

In its place, the BLS began the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, a Federal-State 

cooperative program that identifies all fatal work injuries in the country based on multiple source 

documents, such as death certificates, police and coroner reports, media coverage, and other 

sources. Over the past two decades, the CFOI has become a well-respected and authoritative 

count of fatal work injuries. [Layne, 2004] 

The SOII process today 

It takes three years to produce SOII data for a given year. Year 1 involves identification of the 

sample of establishments, year 2 has that sample of establishments maintaining records of their 

OSHA-recordable injuries and illnesses, and year 3 is for data collection and estimation. Table I 

identifies the process in recent years. 
6

Table I. A 3-year process to produce SOII data 

Year of 

activity

Reference year

2012 data

Reference year

2013 data

Reference year

2014 data

2011 Sample identification

2012 Record injuries Sample identification

2013 Collect and publish Record injuries Sample identification

2014 Collect and publish Record injuries

2015 Collect and publish

The process begins with identification of the universe from which the sample is drawn. Like 

many BLS establishment-based surveys, the SOII universe is derived from unemployment 

insurance files submitted to BLS from the States. 

Prior to selecting a sample from this universe, participating States (those agreeing to share the 

cost of the program) identify industries for which they would like to publish estimates, including 

industries that are common across the United States as well as industries with unique 

concentration in particular States. These industries, based on the North American Industry 

Classification System (NAICS), are used as input to the sample selection process. Within the 

constraints of sample size, budget, and the need to produce national estimates, samples are 

stratified with a focus on those industries identified by each State. Small samples, sufficient to 

produce national but not State estimates, are also selected for non-participating States. 

Samples are selected in time to notify establishments of their requirement to maintain records for 

the reference year of the survey. Such notices, which include references to OSHA forms and 

recordkeeping guidelines, are mailed in December prior to the reference year. At present, there 

is no systematic reminder or follow-up notification to employers during the reference year. 

Data collection occurs one year later, with an initial notice sent to sampled employers in January 

following the reference year. This notice instructs employers about the various means available 

to submit their data, including a BLS data collection application on the internet. About 80 

percent of data are currently captured via this internet application. 
7

Data collection is monitored by the State agencies, with additional mailings and other follow-up 

notifications provided to non-respondents until collection ends in the summer. Survey response 

among private industry establishments is mandated by the OSH Act and typically results in about 

a 95 percent response rate. A lower response rate from State and local governments, around 80 

percent, reflects the fact that in many States collection of these data from government units is not 

mandatory. Concurrent with data collection, the case details submitted in narrative form for 

about 250,000 cases each year are reviewed and translated into codes. Narratives describing the 

workers occupation are classified using the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. 

Narratives describing the circumstances surrounding the injury or illness case are classified by 

the BLS Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS) [Northwood et al, 2012], 

which includes the following characteristics: 

 Nature of disabling condition (such as sprain or fracture) 

 Part of body (such as finger or back) 

 Source directly resulting in injury and, if applicable, secondary source (contributing 

factor) (such as health care patient or piece of equipment) 

 Event or exposure (such as fall or struck by object) 

Various post-collection processes are completed in the summer and early fall of each year, 

designed to adjust data for non-response and other anomalies, such as an employer providing 

data for more than one location. SOII data are typically published in October and November 

following the reference year, as described in the next section. 

Among the known limitations for the SOII is the difficulty in capturing data on workplace 

illnesses. [Pollack et al, 1987] Over 90 percent of the cases identified by the SOII each year are 

injuries, often acute incidents that are easily identified. Most of the illnesses identified in the 

survey are also acute events, such as contact dermatitis or poisonings. Long-latency illnesses 

may be added by employers to OSHA logs when identified, but such identification may be long 

after SOII data are collected from the employer. 
8

SOII outputs 

At present, SOII data are released in two parts – summary estimates of the count and rate of 

occupational injuries and illnesses followed by case and demographic details. Examples of 

summary data, released in October following the reference year, include the number of injuries 

and illnesses recorded (3.5 million in 2011), the rate of injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time 

equivalent workers (3.5 in 2011), separate counts and rates for injuries and illnesses, and these 

same data elements for very detailed industries, by size of establishment, and for most states. In 

addition, counts and rates are shown separately for various types of cases, including days-awayfrom-work cases, job-transfer-or-restriction cases, and other recordable cases. 

Less than a month after the SOII summary data are released, SOII case and demographic data are 

released providing considerable additional detail. Currently these data are produced for all daysaway-from-work cases and for a small number of job-transfer-or-restriction cases in selected 

industries. Of particular importance among the case and demographic data is occupation, 

providing additional information on the type of work being done when a workplace injury 

occurred. Other demographic characteristics include: 

 Gender 

 Age 

 Race 

 Length of service 

As noted, cases are coded based on the BLS Occupational Injury and Illness Classification 

System, which results in publication of details on the nature of the disabling condition, the part 

of body affected, the source directly resulting in the injury or illness (and, if applicable, 

secondary source/contributing factor), and the event or exposure leading to the injury or illness. 

Data are also available on the time of day and day of week of the incident, as well as the number 

of hours on the shift when the event occurred. Finally, by capturing the number of days away 

from work (or, separately, the number of days of job transfer or restriction), some information is 

available on the severity of the injury or illness. Data on days away from work (and days of job 
9

transfer or restriction) are right truncated and therefore are presented as medians and 

distributions, rather than means. 

SOII summary and case and demographic data are available free of charge on the BLS Internet 

site; the site provides tables and charts, technical details, analytical articles, as well as query tools 

to allow user-defined access. Certain more detailed tabulations from the SOII data can be 

produced, subject to confidentiality restrictions. These data may be requested from BLS. In 

addition, researchers may apply to access survey microdata at BLS to conduct more detailed 

research. Some research that questioned the completeness of the SOII was based on work done 

through microdata access agreements with BLS. 

Concerns about completeness of SOII data 

Prior to the OSH Act of 1970, BLS occupational safety and health statistics were captured from 

employers on a voluntary basis. On several occasions, concerns were raised that such statistics 

were incomplete. While the OSH Act makes compliance mandatory for many employers, 

concerns still exist that the SOII data are not complete. Among studies that focused on these 

concerns were those released in the mid-2000s that compared SOII microdata with workers’ 

compensation data in several states. [Rosenman et al, 2006; Boden et al, 2008] These studies 

conclude that SOII undercounts workplace injuries and illnesses, perhaps to a large extent. 

From these studies, and Congressional concerns, BLS began the research effort that resulted in 

the articles published here. In an effort to confirm the existence of an undercount, quantify the 

magnitude, and identify means of improving data quality, BLS provided grants to several States 

and researchers. The grantees were to (1) conduct additional matching of SOII and workers’ 

compensation data, (2) conduct a multisource matching effort using SOII, workers’ 

compensation, and other records to identify a broader set of workplace injuries, and (3) interview 

employers regarding their injury and illness recording practices. These projects were completed 

in 2012.

BLS acknowledges the concerns about completeness of SOII data and is leading efforts to 

understand and mitigate any undercount. These publications are another effort to be transparent 
10

about the concerns and improvement efforts. [Nestoriak and Pierce, 2009, Ruser, 2008] 

Following up on the research published here, BLS is currently sponsoring an extensive series of 

employer interviews to learn more about employer injury and illness recording practices; also 

underway is a match of multiple years of SOII and workers’ compensation data designed to 

identify any trends in the undercount over time. In addition, research efforts are currently 

underway to explore means of improving the consistency of occupation and case data through 

computer-assisted coding techniques. BLS intends to continue the research and improvement 

efforts in the future. 

Conclusion 

The 40 years of SOII summary data and 20 years of case and demographic data provide a 

compendium of occupational injury and illness details and trends, tracking such phenomena as 

the impact of the expanding service and information economy on occupational injury and illness 

rates, the growth in musculoskeletal disorders, and the movement toward handling cases through 

job transfer rather than time away from work. During that time, BLS has adapted to changes in 

OSHA recordkeeping definitions and to changes to industry and occupation classification 

systems, the result of which are several breaks in series. BLS identifies these series breaks when 

presenting data and cautions data users about making comparisons across inconsistent series. In 

addition, BLS has championed many program improvements, including expanding data to 

include occupational injuries and illnesses among State and local government workers 

nationwide, updating the injury and illness classification system to reflect current workplace 

hazards, and greatly reducing processing time to make data available more rapidly. The SOII is 

a versatile data collection system designed to reflect today’s workplace. 

The SOII is continually evolving to meet the need for a comprehensive surveillance system to 

provide accurate workplace injury and illness data, within the constraints of a small sample 

(especially for State data) and the limitations of self-reported data. The SOII has served as a 

platform for two special studies of unique safety and health topics – respirator use and workplace 

violence prevention policies. [BLS, 2012] These projects provided a preview of how the SOII 

can be used when resources become available to study unique populations or incidents, such as 

injuries occurring to truck drivers or those resulting from falls. In the meantime, BLS is 
11

continuing its plans to expand the detailed data available for occupational injuries and illnesses 

that result in job transfer or restricted work, with the long-term goal of having complete data for 

all workers. In addition, BLS will continue to allow qualified researchers to use SOII and other 

data to provide new insights into the safety and health of America’s workers. 
12

References 

BLS. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2012. BLS Handbook of Methods, Chapter 9: Occupational 

Safety and Health Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor. 

BLS. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2013. BLS report on the details of occupational injuries and 

illnesses resulting in job transfer or restricted work. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of 

Labor. 

Boden, LI, Ozonoff, A. 2008. Capture-recapture estimates of nonfatal workplace injuries and 

illnesses. Ann Epidemiol, 18(6): 500–506.

Drudi D. 1997. A Century-Long Quest for Meaningful and Accurate Occupational Injury and 

Illness Statistics, Compensation and Working Conditions, December 1997: 19-27. 

Layne, L. 2004. Occupational injury mortality surveillance in the United States: An examination 

of census counts from two different surveillance systems, 1992-1997. Am. J. Ind. Med., 45: 1-13. 

Rosenman, KD, Kalush, A, Reilly, MJ, Gardiner, JC, Reeves, M, Luo, Z., 2006. How much 

work-related injury and illness is missed by the current national surveillance system? J Occup 

Environ Med, 48(4): 357–365.

Nestoriak, N, Pierce, B. 2009. Comparing workers’ compensation claims with establishments’ 

responses to the SOII. Mon Labor Rev. 132(5): 57-64. 

Northwood JM, Sygnatur, EF, Windau, JA. 2012. Updating BLS Occupational Injury and Illness 

Classification System. Mon Labor Rev, 135(8): 19-28. 

Pollack, ES. Gellerman Keimig, D., editors, 1987. Counting Injuries and illnesses in the 

Workplace: Proposal for a Better System, National Academy Press. 

Ruser, JW. 2008. Examining evidence on whether BLS undercounts workplace injuries and 

illnesses,”Mon Labor Rev, 131(8): 20-32.