alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification
of Chief Executive Officer underSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I
hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OSullivan Industries, Inc.
for the year ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in such annual report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of OSullivan Industries, Inc.

|Date:   September 29, 2003 |  |  | /s/ Richard D. Davidson              
|-------------------------- |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                           |  |  |                                      
|                           |  |  | Richard D. Davidson                  
|                           |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                           |  |  |                                      

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OSullivan Industries, Inc.
and will be retained by OSullivan Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Exhibit 32.2

Certification
of Chief Financial Officer underSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I
hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OSullivan Industries, Inc.
for the year ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in such annual report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of OSullivan Industries, Inc.

|Date:   September 29, 2003 |  |  | /s/ Phillip J. Pacey       
|-------------------------- |  |  | ---------------------------
|                           |  |  |                            
|                           |  |  | Phillip J. Pacey           
|                           |  |  | Senior Vice President      
|                           |  |  | and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OSullivan Industries, Inc.
and will be retained by OSullivan Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### ALI AKBER KIACHIF et al. v. PHILCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

April 6, 1950.

See also 10 P.RD. 278.

*278Samuel B. Ohlbaum, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Donovan, Leisure, Newton, Lumbard & Irvine, New York City, for defendant.

McGOHEY, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant for an order directing the issuance of letters roga-tory to the Appropriate Judicial Authority in Teheran, Iran, for the examination of a witness on written interrogatories and cross-interrogatories. Defendant’s attorney avers that the Kingdom of Iran will not permit examination by commission, and this is not contraverted by the plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs’ attorney objects to interrogatories and suggests the issuance of an open commission providing that defendant pay plaintiffs’ expenses and a reasonable counsel fee. It is claimed that the witness is biased against the plaintiffs. If this be so, there is no reason why it cannot be disclosed by appropriate interrogatories.

Justice and the .ocessities of this case require the issuance of letters rogatory, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 28 (b), 28 U.S.C.A., but the court is not convinced that the situation is so unusual as to call for oral interrogatories. See De Vil-leneuve v. Morning Journal Ass’n, S.D.N.Y., 206 F. 70. The motion is granted and the trial will be stayed until the due return of the letters and the depositions.

The order to be submitted will provide for the filing and service of the direct interrogatories within ten days after the making of the order herein and that cross-interrogatories shall be filed and served within ten days from the service of the direct interrogatories. Objections to interrogatories and cross-interrogatories shall be presented to the court on two days’ notice and within ten days after the filing and service of the matter objected to.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 15 (Monday, January 26, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 4679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1724]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 15 / Monday, January 26, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 4679]]


                Memorandum of January 21, 2009

                
Pay Freeze

                Memorandum for the Assistant to the President and Chief 
                of Staff

                The United States is in a period of severe economic 
                stress. Too many Americans have lost their jobs, their 
                homes, their health insurance, or a substantial part of 
                their retirement savings, and many more feel uncertain 
                about the future.

                In these circumstances, Government must act forcefully 
                and creatively to stimulate our economic recovery, 
                investing in infrastructure, innovative energy 
                technologies, and education. It must act quickly to 
                provide assistance to average Americans.

                Many have accepted the call to serve in Government and 
                to assist me in restoring a sound economy and in 
                improving the lives of average Americans. In this 
                challenging economic period, it is only appropriate 
                that senior officials on the White House staff forgo 
                pay increases until further notice.

                Accordingly, as a signal of our shared commitment to 
                restoring the country's economic vitality and because 
                of the serious economic conditions we are facing, I 
                intend to freeze the salaries of senior members of the 
                White House staff, to the extent permitted by law. I 
                direct you to report back to me within 30 days with 
                recommendations for actions to implement this freeze.

                This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, 
                create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, 
                enforceable at law or in equity by a party against the 
                United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, 
                its officers, employees, or agents, or any other 
                person.

                This memorandum shall be published in the Federal 
                Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 21, 2009

[FR Doc. E9-1724
Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-W9-P
Exhibit 4.3




 





Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated March 12, 2013, in this Registration Statement (File No. 333-186371) of Smart Trust, Value Architects
Innovation SCORE Portfolio Trust, Series 2.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


March 12, 2013
Motion Granted , Vacated and Rendered, and Memorandum Opinion filed

February 1 , 202 2

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 2 1

- 00 521

- CV

____________ TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , Appellant

V.
ALICIA ANN FRAMPTON , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Colorado County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 21

- 5721

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is a n appeal from a judgment signed August 10, 2021 in a suit for judicial
review , vacating an administrative law judge’s decision authorizing the suspension of the appellee’s driver’s license

. On January 12 , 202 2 , the parties filed with this

court a joint motion for this court to render judgment effectuating the parties ’ agreement , the substance of which is to vacate the trial court’s judgment, leaving the2

administrative law judge’s decision in place

. Accordingly, we grant the joint motion, vacate the trial court’s August 10, 2021 judgment and dismiss the case in the county court at law. The administrative law judge’s April 14, 2021 decision remains unchanged

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42 .1 (a)(2)(A).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
Exhibit 1.1

Version
as of August 2002

Articles of Association    of    Infineon Technologies AG

I.    General Provisions

§ 1

Company Name, Registered Place of Business and Fiscal Year

§ 2

Object of the Enterprise

§ 3

Announcements

Announcements
of the company shall be made by publication in the Federal Gazette.

II.    Share Capital and Shares

§ 4

Amount and Division of the Share Capital



---



2

---





III.    The Management Board

§ 5

Composition and Rules of Procedure



3

---

IV.    Supervisory Board

§ 6

Composition, Term of Office, Resignation from Office

§ 7

Chairman, Deputy Chairman

§ 8

Committees of the Supervisory Board

To
the extent to which statute or the articles of association permit, the supervisory board can transfer its duties and rights to its chairman, to individual members or to committees formed from its
midst. If the chairman of the supervisory board belongs to a committee and if there is a tie in the voting of the

4

---

committee, then hebut not his deputyhas two votes if voting is carried out a second time and once again ends in a tie.

§ 9

Convocation and Passing of the Resolutions

§ 10

Duties and Powers of the Supervisory Board

5

---

§ 11

Remuneration

V.    General Meeting of the Shareholders

§ 12

Ordinary General Meeting of the Shareholders

The
ordinary general meeting of the shareholders shall take place within the first eight months of the fiscal year. Its agenda shall include regularly

6

---

§ 13

Place and Convocation

§ 14

Conditions for Participation and the Exercise of Voting Rights

Shareholders
are entitled to participate in the general meeting of the shareholders, and to exercise their voting rights, if they are entered in the company's share register and have given
notification of attendance for the meeting in good time. The notification of attendance shall be made to the management board at the company's registered place of business either in writing or by
facsimile or by means of electronic communication to be determined by the company. The notification of attendance must be received at least six full days before the date of the general meeting. The
management board may specify a shorter deadline for receipt in the notice of convocation of the general meeting. Details of the notification of attendance shall be published together with the notice
of convocation in the relevant publications specified in the Articles of Association.

§ 15

Direction and Course

7

---



§ 16

Voting Right

§ 17

Passing Resolutions

VI.    Annual Financial Statements and Appropriation of Profits

§ 18

Annual Financial Statements

8

---



§ 19

Appropriation of Profits

§ 20

Determination of Contributions in Kind



9

---





§ 21

Costs of Formation

The
company bears the costs of incorporation (notary's and registration fees as well as costs of publication), estimated at DM 100,000.

10

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Bank of the Carolinas Corporation (the
Registrant) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                      |  |                                               
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Robert E. Marziano                        
|                      |  | Robert E. Marziano                            
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer         
|                      | 
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Michelle L. Clodfelter                    
|                      |  | Michelle L. Clodfelter                        
|                      |  | Vice President and Principal Financial Officer
d1364174_ex4-2.htm


Exhibit 4.2







ADDENDUM No. 2


to


the Management Agreement dated 31/05/2011 and any addenda thereto


(the "Management Agreement")







Between


ALAQUA MARINE LIMITED


of Liberia


(as Owner)







And







ALLSEAS MARINE S.A.


of Liberia


(as Manager)







In respect of the management of the Vessel CMA CGM MARLIN (the "Vessel")







Notwithstanding the relevant provisions of the Management Agreement, it is this, 18th day of September 2012, mutually agreed between the Owner and the Manager that a clause 8.05 shall be added to read as follows:







"Unless the agreement is terminated by the Owner in accordance with Clauses 12.03 (iii) and (iv) of this Agreement or by reason of default by gross negligence or misconduct of Manager, its Directors, officers and/or employees in the performance under this Agreement, upon termination of this Agreement in relation to the Vessel, the Management Fee will be continued at the above rate then in effect for 90 days from the date of termination. This is to cover operating and accounting cost of finalizing the Vessels' disbursements, demurrage, etc. In addition, the Owner shall continue to pay the following:








	
  

	
i)

	
Crew support costs for a further period of three calendar months








	
  

	
ii)

	
An equitable proportion of any management staff redundancy costs which may materialize.












Notwithstanding the above, in the event that the Management Agreement is terminated in accordance with Clause 12.05, then the provisions of the Compensation Agreement between the Manager and Box Ships Inc. dated 12/09/2012, copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, forming an integral part of this Agreement, or any renewal thereof shall be applied."







All other fees, terms, conditions and provisions of the Management Agreement remain unaltered and in Full force and effect.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have signed this Addendum this 18th day of September, 2012.



	
 

	
 


	
FOR THE OWNER

	
FOR THE MANAGER


	
 

	
 


	
/s/ Maria Stefanou

	
/s/  George Skrimizeas


	
MARIA STEFANOU

	
GEORGE SKRIMIZEAS


	
Attorney-in-fact

	
Attorney-in-fact
[No. 55397-6-I.

Division One.

October 17, 2005.]

#### Lanette Ramey, *Respondent,*v. William Knorr et al. *Appellants.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-2-05485-4, Robert H. Alsdorf, J., entered February 19 and November 12, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Cox, C.J., concurred in by Coleman and Appelwick, JJ. Now published at 130 Wn. App. 672.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending July 4, 
2009

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, 
as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0150.
    Date Filed: June 29, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote Number S 086. Departure Control Guidelines for 
Secure Flight (RPs 1707b, 1708, 1715, 1719 and 1719b).
    Intended effective date: 1 June 2009.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
 [FR Doc. E9-16752 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]
4910-9X-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

DANIEL DONNELLY,

Plaintiff,

v.

DANIEL GUERRIERO, et al.,

 Defendants.

Civil No. 10-3240 (RMB/JS)

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

This Scheduling Order confirms the directives given to counsel

at the status conference on May 18, 2011;

IT IS this 19th day of May, 2011 hereby ORDERED:

1. By May 20, 2011, plaintiff shall serve defendants with a

written settlement demand.

2. The Court will conduct a telephone conference with 

participating defense counsel on June 13, 2011 at 9:30 a.m., to

only address settlement issues. Mr. Marshall shall initiate the

telephone conference.

3. The Court will conduct an in-person settlement conference

on June 29, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.. All counsel shall attend the

settlement conference and shall make arrangements for their

authorized settlement representatives to be available by telephone.

THE FAILURE OF A PARTY OR ATTORNEY TO OBEY THIS ORDER MAY

RESULT IN IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f).

s/ Joel Schneider 

JOEL SCHNEIDER

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:10-cv-03240-JHR -JS Document 95 Filed 05/19/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 1298
Management Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.64 
 EXECUTION VERSION 
 March 8, 2013 

West Corporation 
 11808 Miracle Hills Drive

 Omaha, Nebraska 68154 
 Attention:
Dave Mussman, General Counsel 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement – Subsequent Fee  

 Dear Mr. Mussman, 
 Reference is made to that certain management agreement
(the “Agreement”) entered into as of October 24, 2006 by and among (i) Omaha Acquisition Corp., (ii) West Corporation (the “Company”), (iii) Quadrangle Advisors II LLC
(“Quadrangle”) and (iv) THL Managers VI, LLC (“THL” and, together with Quadrangle, the “Managers”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to
such terms in the Agreement. 
 Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, (i) the Subsequent Fee shall be
modified such that the fee payable to the Managers by the Company in connection with an Initial Public Offering of the Company, pursuant to Section 2(c) of the Agreement, shall equal $24,000,000. Such Subsequent Fee shall be divided between the
Managers pro rata in proportion to the relative ownership interest in the Company held at the time of consummation of the Initial Public Offering by the investment funds affiliated with each Manager, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.

 The Managers and the Company agree that this modification to the Subsequent Fee shall be effective immediately prior to the
consummation of an Initial Public Offering of the Company and that upon payment in full of the Subsequent Fee, as modified by this letter, the Company shall have no further obligations with respect to any Subsequent Fee or other fees under the
Agreement (other than unpaid Periodic Fees, if any, accrued prior to consummation of the Initial Public Offering). If, however, an Initial Public Offering of the Company is not consummated on or prior to May 1, 2013, the modifications to the
Subsequent Fee set forth in this letter shall be null and void ab initio and the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. 
 Please evidence your acknowledgement of the foregoing by returning a signed copy of this letter to each of the Managers in accordance with the procedure and coordinates that can be found in
Section 10 of the Agreement. 
 [Signature pages follow] 







         Sincerely, 

 

			
		 	QUADRANGLE ADVISORS II LLC
		
		 	/s/ Michael Huber
		 	Name: Michael Huber
		 	Title: President and Managing Principal
		
		 	THL MANAGERS VI, LLC
		 	By: Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., its managing member
		 	By: Thomas H. Lee Advisors, LLC, its general partner
		 	By: THL Holdco, LLC, its managing member
		
		 	/s/ Charles P. Holden
		 	Name: Charles P. Holden
		 	Title: Managing Director


 [Signature Page to Management Letter Agreement] 







 Agreed to and accepted as of 
 the date first written above: 
 WEST CORPORATION 

 

	
	/s/ Thomas B. Barker
	Name: Thomas B. Barker
	Title: Chief Executive Officer

 [Signature Page to Management Letter Agreement]
1 The p etitioner has procee ded in this c ase as if it were an ap peal as o f right, an ap peal to which he is not entitled. We will treat his brief as an application pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-30-216(c).



# FILED
October 15, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE SEPTEMBER 1998 SESSI ON
KENNETH RUSSELL LEWIS, ) ) Appellant, ) No. 03C01-9802-CR-00054

) ) Hamilton County v. ) ) Honorable Stephen M. Bevi l, Judge ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) (Post-Conviction) ) Appellee. )

O R D E R
The petitioner, Kenneth Russell Lewis, has applied for per mission to appeal from the Hamilton County Criminal Court’s refusal to reopen his post-convi ction case that had previously been dismissed with pre judice. 1 He is seeking reli ef relative to his second degree murder conviction upon his guilty plea in December 1991 for which he received a twenty

-five year sentence. H e asserts that (1) the dis missal of his postconviction case wi

th his purported agreement r esulted from the ineffective assis tance of counsel, (2) the state has violated its agreement not to oppose parole, and (3) his attorney in the convi cting case was ineffectiv e in representing him. H e also has moved for consideration of “Post-Judg ment Facts” by whic h he seeks to submit for our consideration medical recor ds that he claims bear upon his issues regarding c

ounsel.
Pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-30-216( c), the petitioner could s eek review of the denial of his motion to reopen by filing an application w

ith this court seeking

permission to appeal. The application may not be granted “unless it appea rs that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion.” Id

.2 The reopening of a post-convi ction case is allowe d in very limited situations. There must be either a new constitutional r

ight established wi th retrospective applic

ation to the petitioner’s c ase, new scientific ev

idence that establishes the petitioner’ s actual innocence, or the i nvalidation of a prior con viction that was used to enhance the peti tioner’s sentence. T.C.A. § 40-30-217(a)(1)-(3). The petitioner alleges none of thes e in this case. In this r

espect, even though his c onvicting case counsel’s affidavit suppo rts the petitioner’s cl aim that the state agreed not to oppose parole, such a claim does not constitute grounds to reopen his previous postconviction case. Als

o, a claim of ineffective assist ance of post-conviction couns el relative to the post-c

onviction case being d ismissed does not provid e the petitioner an avenue of relief. See House v. State , 911 S.W.2d 705, 714 (Tenn. 1995).

We conclude that the trial court did not abus e its discretion in re

fusing to reopen the petitioner’s post-conviction case. In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Motion for Considerat ion of Post-Judgment Facts is denied. (2) Permission to appeal i s denied. (3) The costs of this cause ar e taxed against the state.

____________________________ Joseph M. Tipton, Judge CONCUR:

_________________________ John H. Peay, Judge

_________________________ David G. Hayes, Ju dge