alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rule 4.2. Political and Campaign Activities of Judicial Candidates in Public 

Elections

***

(B) A candidate for elective judicial office may, unless prohibited by law, 

and not earlier than immediately after the General Election in the 

year prior to the calendar year in which a person may become a 

candidate for such office: 

***

(3) publicly endorse or speak on behalf of, or publicly oppose or 

speak in opposition to, candidates for the same judicial office 

for which he or she is a judicial candidate, or publicly endorse 

or speak on behalf of candidates for any other elective judicial 

office appearing on the same ballot; 

***

Comment:

***

(5) For purposes of paragraph (B)(3), candidates are considered to be a 

candidate for the same judicial office if they are competing for a single 

judgeship or for one of several judgeships on the same court to be filled as 

a result of the election. Additionally, the phrase “candidates for any 

other elective judicial office appearing on the same ballot” means 

candidates who appear together on the paper ballot or, in the case of 

electronic voting terminals, appear together on the electronic ballot.

In endorsing or opposing another candidate for a position on the same 

court, a judicial candidate must abide by the same rules governing 

campaign conduct and speech as apply to the candidate’s own campaign.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before August 14, 2009 to be assured of consideration.

## Bureau of Public Debt (BPD)

*OMB Number:*                     1535-0138.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Revision.                 

*Title:*                     New Treasury Direct.                 

*Forms:*                     5444, 5511, 5512, 5446.                 

*Description:*                     The information is requested to establish a new account and process transactions.                 

*Respondents:*                     Businesses or other for-profits.                 

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     97,000 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Judi Owens (304) 480-8150, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Shagufta Ahmed (202) 395-7873, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Celina Elphage, 

Treasury PRA, Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9-16787 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       6,751,034
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               36,399,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 28,399,190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            76,768,876
<PP&E>                                      25,238,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,565,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,774,496
<BONDS>                                     46,381,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,721
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,998,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               120,565,027
<SALES>                                     28,003,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,003,702
<CGS>                                       20,945,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,945,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,656,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,455,505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,701
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,701
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 09, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 09, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0154. LINDSEY NELSON JR. v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

01CR59
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1723]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6495]


Designation of Benefits Under the Foreign Missions Act; 
Diplomatic and Consular Exemption From Tobacco Excise Taxes

    After due consideration of the benefits, privileges and immunities 
provided to missions of the United States under the Vienna Diplomatic 
and Consular Conventions and other governing treaties, and in order to 
facilitate relations between the United States and foreign governments, 
to improve or maintain the availability of tax exemption privileges for 
the United States, and by virtue of the authority vested in me under 
the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. 4301 et seq., and Delegation of 
Authority No. 214, Sec.  14, dated September 20, 1994, I hereby 
designate as a benefit under the Act, to be granted to foreign 
diplomatic and consular missions and personnel in the United States on 
the basis of reciprocity and as otherwise determined by the Department, 
to include personnel of international organizations and missions to 
such organizations who are otherwise entitled to exemption from direct 
taxes, exemption from Federal and State or local excise taxes imposed 
with respect to tobacco products (as defined in 26 U.S.C. 5702) 
manufactured, packaged or sold in the United States. Procedures 
governing implementation of this benefit will be established by the 
Department of the Treasury.

DATES: Effective Date: January 28, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical Information: Cliff 
Seagroves, 202-647-1395, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82f1e7e3e5f0edf4e7f1e1e1c2f1f6e3f6e7ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d0e181c1a0f120b180e1e1e3d0e091c0918531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Legal Information: Susan Benda, 202-647-0308, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fe9c9b909a9f8dbe8d8a9f8a9bd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4d6d1dad0d5c7f4c7c0d5c0d19ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 14, 2009.
Eric J. Boswell,
Ambassador, Director of the Office of Foreign Missions and Assistant 
Secretary for Diplomatic Security, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E9-1723 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-43-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 31**
**Certification**
     I, Michael Coco, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Advanta Business Receivables Corp. on behalf of Advanta Business Card MasterTrust;
     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe trustee by the Servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusionin these reports is included in these reports;
     4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in the report andrequired to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing,or similar, agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the Servicer has fulfilled itsobligations under the servicing agreement; and
     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicer’s compliancewith the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent publicaccountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program forMortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,agreement, that is included in these reports.     Date: March 30, 2005       By: /s/ Michael Coco  Name: Michael Coco  Title: President of Advanta Business Receivables Corp.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Other expenditures

Personal insurance and pensions

Entertainment

Health care

Transportation

Apparel and services

Housing

Food

Percent of total expenditures

Married couple with children

Married couple only

Single parent

Chart 6-8. Single-parent families allocated more of their 

expenditure dollar to basic items—food and housing—than 

did married-couple families in 2004

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Expenditure category

Chart 6-8. Single-parent families allocated more of their 

expenditure dollar to basic items—food and housing—than 

did married-couple families in 2004

• In addition to food and housing, single-parent families allocated a larger share 

of their expenditure dollar to apparel and services (about 6 percent) than did 

other family groups.

• Married couples spent more as a share of total spending on transportation 

(about 20 percent) than did single-parent families. 

• Each family group allocated roughly 5 cents of every expenditure dollar to 

entertainment.
CHARLES PRYOR,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-0776

Opinion filed November 14, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Charles Pryor, pro se, Petitioner.

Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

VAN NORTWICK, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
EX-99.1

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
of Capital Group One, Inc. for the year ended February 28, 2003,
I, Matthew McNeally Chief Executive Officer of Financial
Ventures, Inc. and I, James Steward, Chief Financial Officer of
Capital Group One, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) 	such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
February 28, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) 	the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-
KSB for the year ended February 28, 2003, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Capital Group One, Inc.

December 4, 2003


                            By:/s/ Matthew McNeally
                            --------------------------
                              Matthew McNeally
                              Chief Executive Officer


                            By:/s/ James Steward
                  	    --------------------
                              James Steward
                              Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
# Worker Displacement

"The Worker Displacement release presents data about displaced workers¿persons who lost or left jobs because their plant or company closed or moved, there was insufficient work for them to do, or their position or shift was abolished.  This release includes data about reemployment rates of displaced workers and occupation and industry of the lost job.  Demographic characteristics are also presented.  Issued every 2 years.  To learn more, visit www.bls.gov/cps/lfcharacteristics.htm#displaced."

- From 2019 to 2021, 3.6 million workers displaced from jobs they held for at least 3 years
- From 2017 to 2019, 2.7 million workers displaced from jobs they held for at least 3 years
- From 2015 to 2017, 3.0 million workers displaced from jobs they held for at least 3 years
- From 2013-15, 3.2 million workers were displaced from jobs held for at least 3 years
- From 2011-13, 4.3 million workers were displaced from jobs held for at least 3 years
- From 2009-11, 6.1 million workers were displaced from jobs they held for at least 3 years
[No. 23436-3-III.

Division Three.

November 15, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Cody Lee Hughes, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 03-8-00049-2, Craig J. Matheson, J., entered September 15, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kato, C. J., concurred in by Brown, J., and Thompson, J. Pro Tern.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 675 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 675

To amend titles XI and XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the cap 
  on Medicaid payments for Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the 
Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa and to adjust the Medicaid 
             statutory matching rate for those territories.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

Mrs. Christensen (for herself, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Acevedo-Vila, and 
Ms. Bordallo) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend titles XI and XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the cap 
  on Medicaid payments for Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the 
Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa and to adjust the Medicaid 
             statutory matching rate for those territories.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF THE CAP ON MEDICAID PAYMENTS FOR PUERTO RICO, THE 
              VIRGIN ISLANDS, GUAM, THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, AND 
              AMERICAN SAMOA AND ADJUSTMENT OF THE MEDICAID STATUTORY 
              MATCHING RATE FOR THOSE TERRITORIES.

    (a) Removal of Cap.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1108 of the Social Security Act 
        (42 U.S.C. 1308) is amended by striking subsections (f) and 
        (g).
            (2) Conforming amendments.--(A) Section 1902(j) of such Act 
        (42 U.S.C. 1396a(j)) is amended by striking ``the limitation in 
        section 1108(f),''.
            (B) Section 1905(u) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(u)) is 
        amended by striking paragraph (4).
    (b) Adjustment of Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP).--
Section 1905(b)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)(2)) is amended by 
striking ``50 per centum'' and inserting ``for purposes of this title 
only 77 percent''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to 
expenditures made on or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward W. Voliton, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 847]

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Covello, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 581 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 581

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that certain sexual 
 crimes against children are predicate crimes for the interception of 
                communications, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (for herself, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Smith of 
 New Jersey, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, Mr. Simmons, Mr. Kildee, and Mr. 
   Pomeroy) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that certain sexual 
 crimes against children are predicate crimes for the interception of 
                communications, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Sex Crimes Wiretapping Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS IN THE 
              INVESTIGATION OF SEXUAL CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN.

    Section 2516(1)(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``section 1591 (sex trafficking of 
        children by force, fraud, or coercion),'' after ``section 1511 
        (obstruction of State or local law enforcement),''; and
            (2) by inserting ``section 2251A (selling or buying of 
        children), section 2252A (relating to material constituting or 
        containing child pornography), section 2252B (relating to child 
        obscenity), section 2260 (production of sexually explicit 
        depictions of a minor for importation into the United States), 
        sections 2421, 2422, 2423, and 2425 (relating to transportation 
        for illegal sexual activity and related crimes),'' after 
        ``sections 2251 and 2252 (sexual exploitation of children),''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 693

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

certain death gratuity payments to members of the uniformed services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2003

Mr. JONES of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. COLE, Mr. WILSON of South 

Carolina, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. FORBES, Mr. 

ABERCROMBIE, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. HAYES, Mr. TANNER, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. MATSUI, 

Mr. EVERETT, Mrs. BONO, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. DICKS, Mr. 

SCHROCK, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. 

KOLBE, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. KLINE, Mr. MICA, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. TERRY, 

Mr. CALVERT, and Mr. REYES) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income certain death gratuity payments to 

members of the uniformed services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Death Gra5 tuity Improvement Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 693 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF CERTAIN 

2 DEATH GRATUITY PAYMENTS TO MEMBERS 

3 OF UNIFORMED SERVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 134(b) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain 

6 military benefits) is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(C) EXCEPTION FOR DEATH GRATUITY

9 INCREASE.—Subparagraph (A) shall be applied 

10 by substituting ‘December 31, 1991’ for ‘Sep11 tember 9, 1986’ in the case of a death gratuity 

12 payable under chapter 75 of title 10, United 

13 States Code, with respect to a death occurring 

14 after September 10, 2001.’’. 

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (A) 

16 of section 134(b)(3) of such Code is amended by striking 

17 ‘‘subparagraph (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraphs (B) 

18 and (C)’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to amounts paid with respect to 

21 deaths occurring after September 10, 2001.

Æ