alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

27. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, sex, and age

[Numbers in thousands]

Reason

Total,

16 years

and over

Men,

20 years

and over

Women,

20 years

and over

Both sexes,

16 to 19

years

2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,747 12,506 6,898 5,984 5,450 5,125 1,400 1,397

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs. . . . 8,106 6,877 4,856 3,996 3,070 2,705 181 176

On temporary layoff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,230 1,183 782 726 397 399 51 59

Not on temporary layoff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,876 5,694 4,074 3,270 2,673 2,307 129 117

Permanent job losers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,486 4,447 3,197 2,515 2,202 1,863 87 69

Persons who completed temporary jobs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,390 1,247 877 754 471 444 42 48

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956 967 464 464 441 460 52 43

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,401 3,345 1,312 1,250 1,661 1,676 429 419

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,284 1,316 267 274 279 284 739 758

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs. . . . 59.0 55.0 70.4 66.8 56.3 52.8 12.9 12.6

On temporary layoff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.9 9.5 11.3 12.1 7.3 7.8 3.7 4.2

Not on temporary layoff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50.0 45.5 59.1 54.6 49.0 45.0 9.2 8.4

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.0 7.7 6.7 7.8 8.1 9.0 3.7 3.1

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.7 26.7 19.0 20.9 30.5 32.7 30.6 30.0

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.3 10.5 3.9 4.6 5.1 5.5 52.8 54.3

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs. . . . 5.3 4.4 6.1 5.0 4.5 3.9 3.2 3.0

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.7

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2 2.2 1.7 1.6 2.4 2.4 7.5 7.2

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 12.9 13.0

NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 21, 2009 / Presidential Documents 35765 

Memorandum of July 17, 2009 

Assignment of Reporting Functions Under the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2009 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of Defense[,] the 

Attorney General[, and] the Director of National Intelligence 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States 

Code, I hereby assign the authority to perform the functions conferred upon 

the President by sections 319(a), (c), and (d) and sections 14103(d), (e), 

and (f) of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111– 

32), as follows: 

1. To the Attorney General, of providing to the Congress the reports 

specified in sections 319(a), 319(c)(1)-(3), and 14103(f), as well as the 

plan specified in section 14103(d); 

2. To the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, of providing to the Congress the report specified in 

sections 319(a), 319(c)(4)-(5), and 319(d); and 

3. To the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, 

of providing to the Congress the information specified in section 14103(e). 

The Attorney General is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum 

in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, July 17, 2009. 

[FR Doc. E9–17451 

Filed 7–20–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4410–19–M 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with MISCELLANEOUSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
#### Sandra TORRES-TORRES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-72292.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 2012.*

Filed Dec. 10, 2012.

Sandra Torres-Torres, San Jose, CA, pro se.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, James A. Hunolt, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., M. Jocelyn Wright, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before: CUDAHY,** TROTT, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Petitioner Torres-Torres, a thirty-eight year old citizen of Mexico with four United States citizen children, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) affirmance of an immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of her application for cancellation of removal. The ground for the IJ’s denial which the BIA affirmed was his *620conclusion that because she “lied” to an asylum officer, Torres-Torres lacked good moral character and was, therefore, statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal. 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(6).

The record is devoid of any evidence that the disputed misrepresentation Torres-Torres made to the asylum officer during an interview was “made with the subjective intent of obtaining immigration benefits.” *Kungys v. United States,*485 U.S. 759, 780, 108 S.Ct. 1587, 99 L.Ed.2d 839 (1988). With respect to her testimony before the IJ, he found it to be credible. We take note of the government’s failure in its response brief either to refer to *Kungys*or to respond to Torres-Torres’s argument that the requisite subjective intent element is missing from the administrative evidentiary record.

However, the IJ also determined that Torres-Torres had failed to establish the continuous physical presence in the United States required to qualify for cancellation. Moreover, the IJ took into consideration alleged welfare fraud on her part in connection with his determination that she failed to establish her good moral character. The BIA did not mention these matters in its Decision. Accordingly, the matter is remanded to the BIA to take these matters into account in revisiting the IJ’s Oral Decision in connection with Torres-Torres’s appeal. *See INS v. Orlando Ventura,*587 U.S. 12, 16-17, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION GRANTED IN PART, REMANDED IN PART FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND OFFICERS
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
                   OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Javan Khazali, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Accounting Officer), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB and amendments thereto of
Giant Jr. Investments Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am the registrant's only certifying officer. I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I am the registrant's only certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I am the registrant's only certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date or our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


/s/ Javan Khazali
------------------
Javan Khazali
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

February 4, 2004
Exhibit 10.15
  Granted Under Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan
 Grant of Option
 [Date] [Name] [Number] [Price]
  Vesting Schedule
 [insert vesting schedule] [Vesting Commencement Date].




---



##### 



Exercise of Option
 Form of Exercise
 Continuous Relationship with the Company Required
 Termination of Relationship with the Company provided that
 Exercise Period Upon Death or Disability
 -2-




---



##### 



provided that
 Discharge for Cause
 Withholding
  Nontransferability of Option
  Agreement in Connection with Public Offering
  Provisions of the Plan
  -3-




---



##### 



Blackboard Inc.Dated: [Grant Date]
    By:Name:Title: -4-




---



##### 



PARTICIPANT:Print Name:Address:TIN/SSN:
 -5-
Case 2:11-cr-00225-SDW Document 16 Filed 09/07/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 39
Case 2:11-cr-00225-SDW Document 16 Filed 09/07/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 40
Case 2:11-cr-00225-SDW Document 16 Filed 09/07/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 41
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK KINCHLER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

KATHRYN SHEA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-35710

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-05130-RBL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 16, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Washington state prisoner Patrick Kinchler appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28

FILED

APR 23 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-35710

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Kendall v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 518 F.3d 1042,

1046 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm.

 The district court properly dismissed Kinchler’s due process claims because

his removal from his Correctional Industries job and temporary exclusion from the

“G Building” did not implicate a constitutionally protected liberty or property

interest. See Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 (1972) (procedural

protections of due process clause are triggered only when there is a cognizable

liberty or property interest at stake); Chappell v. Mandeville, 706 F.3d 1052, 1064

(9th Cir. 2013) (“[T]o find a violation of a state-created liberty interest the

hardship imposed on the prisoner must be ‘atypical and significant . . . in relation

to the ordinary incidents of prison life.’” (citation omitted)); see also Weilburg v.

Shapiro, 488 F.3d 1202, 1205 (9th Cir. 2007) (dismissal of a pro se complaint

without leave to amend is proper if it is clear that amendment would be futile).

To the extent that Kinchler intended to raise an Eighth Amendment claim,

his complaint failed to allege facts showing “a denial of the minimal civilized

measure of life’s necessities” and nothing suggests that it could be amended to do

so. Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1089 (9th Cir. 1996) (internal quotation marks

and citation omitted).
3 12-35710

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

(per curiam).

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 6705]

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to the 30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: DS-7655, Iraqi Citizens and Nationals Employed by U.S. Federal Contractors, Grantees, and Cooperative Agreement Partners, OMB Control Number 1405-0184 published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Tuesday, July 14, 2009, in Volume 74-No. 133, page 34070. The document contained incorrect `Estimated Number of Responses' due to a typographical error.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Robert S. Lower (POC), Department of State, A/LM Room 525, P.O. Box 9115 Rosslyn Station, Arlington, VA 22219, who may be reached at 703-875-5822 or at                         *LowerRS@state.gov.*

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of Tuesday, July 14, 2009, in Volume 74-No. 133, page 34070, in the 3rd column 7th bullet, correct the 7th bullet to read:                    
      -  Estimated Number of Responses:                          200.                    

Dated: July 15, 2009.

William H. Moser, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Logistics Management,   Bureau of Administration,  Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-17549 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONOF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, the undersigned, JayC. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of Forgent Networks, Inc. (the “Company”),do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended January 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ JAY C. PETERSON     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Jay C. Peterson         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | March 14, 2007          |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Forgent Networks, Inc. and will be retained by ForgentNetworks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.  The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andis not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
# 2011

&8page &P of &N	

# 2012

&8page &P of &N	

# 2013

&8page &P of &N	

# 2014

&8page &P of &N	

# 2015

&8page &P of &N	

# 2016

&8page &P of &N	

# 2017

&8page &P of &N	

# 2018

&8page &P of &N
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, NCI-ARRA Grand Opportunities Clinical/Translational.                    

*Date:*                         August 5-6, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To provide concept review of proposed grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Bethesda North Hotel & Conference Ctr., Bethesda, MD.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Majed M. Hamawy, MBA, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Research Programs Review Branch, Division of Extramual Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8135, Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-594-5659,                         *mh101v@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to scheduling conflicts.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 16, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-17440 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 615

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the Hope Scholarship 

Credit to be used for elementary and secondary expenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. 

NORWOOD, and Mr. TANCREDO) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

Hope Scholarship Credit to be used for elementary and 

secondary expenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hope Plus Scholarship 

5 Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 615 IH 

1 SEC. 2. HOPE SCHOLARSHIP CREDIT AVAILABLE FOR ELE2 MENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL 

3 EXPENSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (f) of section 25A of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(3) SPECIAL RULE FOR HOPE SCHOLARSHIP

8 CREDIT.—In the case of the Hope Scholarship Cred9 it, the term ‘qualified tuition and related expenses’ 

10 shall include ‘qualified elementary and secondary 

11 education expenses’ (as defined in section 

12 530(b)(4)); except that—

13 ‘‘(A) such term shall include a contribution 

14 or gift to the school (other than the home 

15 school) at which dependents of the taxpayer are 

16 attending, and 

17 ‘‘(B) the term ‘school’ shall include a home 

18 school.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

21 December 31, 2003.

Æ
**J M** **K** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 18 - 0 218 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RANDY LEE TYER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted a n extension of time to and including Ju ly 6 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 10 2020

06/10/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0218