alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S06Y1365.

#### IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM HENRY MITCHELL III.

(632 SE2d 649)

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the State Bar Disciplinary Board’s Review Panel addressing a Notice of Reciprocal Discipline issued to Respondent William Henry Mitchell III pursuant to Rule 9.4 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. Mitchell was properly served by publication pursuant to Bar Rule 4-203.1 (b) (3) after personal service was unsuccessful and he has not filed any objection to the imposition of reciprocal discipline.

The reciprocal discipline arose out of an Agreed Judgment of Partially Probated Suspension entered into by Mitchell before the Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline based on Mitchell’s violation of various provisions of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. The agreement addressed four disciplinary complaints in which Mitchell failed to obtain an executed written contingency fee contract and failed to designate a medical expert in a case against a medical doctor and hospital resulting in the dismissal of the case and then failed to timely file a motion for new trial or a timely notice of appeal; failed to pursue a client’s medical injury lawsuit resulting in dismissal of the case for want of prosecution and failed to inform the client of the dismissal; failed to respond to certain discovery in a divorce action resulting in sanctions against Mitchell; and failed to pursue actions on a client’s behalf in the probate of the client’s son’s estate.

Pursuant to the agreement, Mitchell received a five-year suspension from the practice of law beginning March 15, 2004 with the first two years of the suspension deemed to be an active suspension and the last three years a probated suspension with a number of *770detailed terms and conditions. As Georgia does not have a probated suspension, the Review Panel concluded that the most analogous discipline in Georgia to Mitchell’s Texas suspension would be a two-year suspension pursuant to Bar Rule 4-102 (b) (2) beginning on the date of this Court’s opinion imposing the suspension and that following said suspension, Mitchell may be reinstated to the practice of law in Georgia upon his affirmative demonstration that he has been reinstated to the practice of law in Texas.

Decided July 13, 2006.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Gene Chapman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

After a review of the record, we hereby accept the recommendation of the Review Panel. Mitchell hereby is suspended from the practice of law in Georgia for two years from the date of this opinion. At the end of the two-year suspension, Mitchell may be reinstated to the practice of law in this state upon his affirmative demonstration that he has been reinstated to the practice of law in Texas. Mitchell is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Two-year suspension.*

*All the Justices concur, except Hunstein, P. J., who dissents.*
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1182 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1182

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 201 West Cherokee Street in Brookhaven, Mississippi, as the ``Deputy 
  Donald William Durr, Corporal Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 11, 2019

Mrs. Hyde-Smith introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 201 West Cherokee Street in Brookhaven, Mississippi, as the ``Deputy 
  Donald William Durr, Corporal Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPUTY DONALD WILLIAM DURR, CORPORAL ZACH MOAK, AND 
              PATROLMAN JAMES WHITE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 West Cherokee Street in Brookhaven, Mississippi, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Deputy Donald William Durr, Corporal 
Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Deputy 
Donald William Durr, Corporal Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White 
Memorial Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
# cpsaat11
# Tech doc table

https://www.bls.gov/cps/documentation.htm

# Release table B

https://www.bls.gov/cps/documentation.htm

# Release table C

https://www.bls.gov/cps/documentation.htm

# Detailed table

https://www.bls.gov/cps/documentation.htm

#  Veterans table

https://www.bls.gov/cps/documentation.htm
# msd_CD_R2_00
**EXHIBIT 10.37**

 

**Amendment 1 to the License AgreementDated May 4, 1999 BetweenGeneral Dynamics Information Systems, Inc. (“GDIS”)and Conductus, Inc. (“Conductus”)**

 

Section 16.                                      Survivaland Indemnity is amended to add the following:

 

16.4  Lucent Agreement — Indemnity

 

Conductus isparty to a certain agreement identified as "Superconducting FilterTechnology Joint Development Agreement," effective April 25, 1996, underwhich Lucent Technologies, Inc. has an option to obtain a non-exclusive licensein Conductus' intellectual property. The parties understand and agree that, should Lucent Technologies, Inc.exercise such right, Conductus will indemnify GDIS for any well documented lossof net profits directly arising from Lucent’s use of such license rights wheresuch exercise of rights is both (1) within the Permitted Market; and (2) indirect competition with GDIS.  Thisindemnification shall not apply where Lucent would not require a license fromConductus because the government has a non-exclusive license in the backgroundintellectual property.  Where available,indemnification by Conductus will be satisfied by giving GDIS credit for theamount of such lost profits out of future royalty payments payable by GDIS toConductus.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partieshereto have caused this Amendment to be executed this 12th day of May 1999.

 

GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATIONSYSTEMS, INC.

 
| By:    | /s/ James  Finley |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|
|   | [Name]            |   |
| Its:   | President         |   |
|   | [Title]           |   |

 

CONDUCTUS, INC.

 
| By:    | /s/ Charles  E. Shalvoy |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | [Name]                  |   |
|   |                    |   |
| Its:   | President  & CEO    |   |
|   | [Title]                 |   |

 

----
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Infineon Technologies AG (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Peter J. Fischl, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: December 4, 2002 |  |        |                        
|----------------------- |  | ------ | -----------------------
|                        |  | By:    | /s/PETER J. FISCHL     
|                        |  | Name:  | Peter J. Fischl        
|                        |  | Title: | Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
#### In the Matter of Eric Polite, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 211]

Petitioner contends that he was denied adequate employee assistance and that he was improperly denied the right to call certain witnesses. However, the only objections petitioner made at the hearing were with respect to the denial of witnesses he requested to testify regarding the incident leading to the threats charge. Likewise, petitioner’s claim of inadequate assistance is directed solely to the assistance as it pertained to the threats charge. Inasmuch as that charge was dismissed upon administrative appeal, petitioner’s claims with respect to such are moot *(see Matter of May v Selsky,*291 AD2d 591, 592 [2002]). Moreover, because petitioner did not object at the hearing to the alleged denial of his witnesses with respect to the remaining charges, this claim is not preserved for our review *(see Matter of Tafari v Brown,*47 AD3d 979 [2008]; *Matter of Carter v Goord,*45 AD3d 1077, 1078 [2007]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         26,268
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  199,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                   26,542
<INVENTORY>                                    27,711
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               550,538
<PP&E>                                         179,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                 79,205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,563,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          331,065
<BONDS>                                        1,713,057
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          447,776
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       781,491
<OTHER-SE>                                     (741,754)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,563,463
<SALES>                                        721,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               721,053
<CGS>                                          159,663
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               501,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             68,963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,531)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,685)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,846)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (15,401)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (24,247)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.38)
        



</TABLE>
-1- 

### STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

CATHLEEN MARIE CRUCHON,

Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED May 24, 2016

v No. 326522

Macomb Circuit Court BARO MINI STORAGE, LC No. 2014-000998-NO

Defendant-Appellant/CrossAppellee,

and

NEW IMAGE LANDSCAPE LLC,

Defendant.

Before: M URPHY , P.J., and C AVANAGH and R ONAYNE K RAUSE , JJ.

R ONAYNE K RAUSE

, J. ( concurring ).

I concur in result only.

/s/ Amy Ronayne Krause
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

JACOB FAY LUKE, SR. 

NO. 2024 KW 0148

APRIL 19, 2024

In Re: Jacob Fay Luke, Sr., applying for supervisory writs, 

32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, 

No. 794927. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include

a copy of the habitual offender bill of information, all

pertinent minute entries, transcripts of the habitual offender

adjudication and sentencing hearings, copies of the complained

of documents used in his habitual offender adjudication, and any

other portions of the district court record that might support

the claims raised in the writ application. 

MRT

AHP

HG

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
EXHIBIT 10.1

                     FIELD POINT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY
                        ONE LANDMARK SQUARE, SUITE 1900
                               STAMFORD, CT 06901


March 6, 2013

PASSUR Aerospace, Inc.
One Landmark Square, Suite 1900
Stamford, CT 06901

As Chairman of the Board as well as the principal shareholder of PASSUR
Aerospace, Inc. ("PASSUR Aerospace" or the "Company"), I make the following
commitment to the Company with respect to the period from the date of this
commitment through March 6, 2014.

Liquidity

I commit that if the Company at any time is unable to meet its obligations
through March 6, 2014, that I will provide the necessary continuing financial
support to the Company to ensure the Company's ability to operate as a going
concern through the period ending March 6, 2014. Such continuing support may
take the form of additional loans or advances to PASSUR Aerospace in addition to
the deferral of principal and/or interest payments due on outstanding loans to
PASSUR Aerospace as referred to above.

These commitments are not conditional and are irrevocable through the period
ending March 6, 2014.

I, G.S. Beckwith Gilbert, having the financial wherewithal to enter into this
irrevocable commitment, make the above commitments to the Company and its
shareholders.

/s/ G.S. Beckwith Gilbert
-------------------------
G.S. Beckwith Gilbert
President
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 140 (Thursday, July 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, August 25, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Committee will be held Tuesday, August 25, 2009, at 1 p.m. 
Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley 
at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 
211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments 
to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 16, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-17463 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Frank Litvack M.D., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Conor Medsystems, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 31, 2005 

 

/s/    FRANK LITVACK,M.D.                                        

Frank Litvack, M.D. 

*Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer*

(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996          JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996          SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         645,959              645,959
<SECURITIES>                                 8,235,824            8,235,824
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,755,195            3,755,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                    0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,401,563            1,401,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,429,011           14,429,011
<PP&E>                                       2,881,462            2,881,462
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,443,235           17,443,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,253,223            4,253,223
<BONDS>                                      1,162,194            1,162,194
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                    0
<COMMON>                                           695                  695
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,443,235           17,443,235
<SALES>                                        804,355            1,805,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,273,043            8,895,148
<CGS>                                          552,147            1,215,831
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,579,320           12,914,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               108,838              183,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (46,659)             (133,337)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                    0
<CHANGES>                                            0                    0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,244,098)          (3,969,747)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)               (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                   0
        

</TABLE>