alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew A. Flynn,Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Matthew A. Flynn                                         |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Matthew  A. Flynn                                             |
| Senior  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| August  9, 2004                                               |

 

This certificationaccompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

66

----
#### Rodney F. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Scott GREEN; Kathleen Petrie; Keith Petrie; KPTOO, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-3044.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 16, 2013.

Filed: April 24, 2013.

Rodney F. Jackson, Atlanta, GA, pro se.

Jeffrey Raymond Mohrhauser, Robert Nathaniel Stewart, Rawlings & Ellwanger, Sioux City, IA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Jackson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment action. Jackson, an African American, asserted that defendants retaliated against him and terminated his employment in violation of Title VII. After careful consideration, we hold that summary judgment was proper. *See Glascock v. Linn Cnty. Emergency Med,., PC,*698 F.3d 695, 697 (8th Cir.2012) (de novo standard of review). First, we conclude that the retaliation claim failed, as Jackson did not show that he engaged in protected activity: although his work hours were reduced after he reported harassment by coworkers who were white, the record does not reflect that he communicated to his superiors facts indicating the harassment was race based. *See Guimaraes v. SuperValu, Inc.,*674 F.3d 962, 978 (8th Cir.2012) (prima facie case of Title VII retaliation requires showing that plaintiff engaged in protected activity and suffered adverse employment action that was causally linked to the protected activity; to be protected activity, plaintiffs complaint to employer must include sufficient facts to raise inference of, for example, race discrimination).

Second, even if Jackson asserted a pri-ma facie case on his race-discrimination claim, *see Twymon v. Wells Fargo & Co.,*462 F.3d 925, 934-35 (8th Cir.2006) (describing framework of *McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,*411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973)), defendants proffered a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for Jackson’s discharge: his manager believed he had abandoned his job when he did not show up at work as she expected and did not call for almost a month, *see Jones v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.,*461 F.3d 982, 991-92 (8th Cir.2006) (job abandonment is legitimate reason for terminating employee). We conclude that the evidence, when taken in the light most favorable to Jackson, reveals no triable issue of fact as to whether the proffered reason was a pretext for race discrimination. *See Twymon,*462 F.3d at 935 (to show pretext, plaintiff must both discredit employer’s proffered reason for termination and show circumstances permitting reasonable inference that real reason was race).

*634Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Jackson’s pending motion.

1

. The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, United States Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of Iowa, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                        1,142,958
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                       1,811,801
<RECEIVABLES>                                  355,200
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,102,757
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                             25,737
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                             0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                            1,783
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                            1,783
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    2,079,430
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                         52,641
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                             0
<NET-ASSETS>                                 2,077,020
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                               31,398
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                  29,032
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              0
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                        17,742
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                        6,983
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                            6,983
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                        (84,428)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                            5,221
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                 29,032
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                         2,079,932
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                         1,161.23
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   3.92
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                              0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                           1,165.15
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   1.40





</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      of Title 18 of the United States Code

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of NTR Acquisition Co. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William E. Hantke,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ WILLIAM E. HANTKE
-----------------------------------
William E. Hantke
Principal Financial Officer
May 14, 2007

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NTR Acquisition Co. and will be
retained by NTR Acquisition Co. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.1


 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 Between DSP Group, Inc. (“Parent”), DSP Group, Ltd.
(the “Company”) and Ofer Elyakim (the “Executive”). Effective date of this amendment is March 5, 2013. 
 Executive entered
into an employment agreement with the Company, effective June 1, 2009, which agreement was amended on January 31, 2011, May 16, 2011 and November 5, 2012 (the employment agreement and the amendments thereto hereinafter collectively referred to as
the “Employment Agreement”). The Employment Agreement is hereby further amended as follows: 
 1. Section 3c of the Employment
Agreement is amended and restated as follows: 
 The Company will be entitled to terminate your employment without prior
notification in the following cases: (a) your willful and continued failure to substantially perform your duties with the Company or Parent (other than such failure resulting from your incapacity due to physical or mental illness) after there is
delivered to you by the Board of Directors of Parent (the “Board”) a written demand for substantial performance which sets forth in detail the specific respects in which it believes you have not substantially performed your duties; (b)
your willfully engaging in gross misconduct which is materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company or Parent; or (c) your committing a felony or an act of fraud against the Company or Parent. 

No act, or failure to act, by you shall be considered “willful” if done, or omitted to be done, by you in good faith and in
your reasonable belief that your act or omission was in the best interest of the Company or Parent and/or required by applicable law. 
 2. For
purposes of the Employment Agreement, “Cause” is the occurrence of any of the events set forth in Section 3c as herein amended and restated. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, you shall not be deemed to have been
terminated for Cause unless and until there shall have been delivered to you a copy of a resolution duly adopted by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the entire membership of the Board at a meeting of the Board called and held for
that purpose (after reasonable notice to and an opportunity for you, together with your counsel, to be heard before the Board), finding that in the good faith opinion of the Board, you were guilty of conduct set forth in Section 3c and specifying
the particulars thereof in detail. 
 3. This amendment to the Employment Agreement shall be binding upon Parent, the Company and their
successors and assigns, if any. 
 4. All terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement, other than amended hereby, shall remain in full
force and effect. 
  

							
	 /s/ Eli Ayalon
	 		 		 	 /s/ Ofer Elyakim

	DSP Group, Inc.	 		 		 	Ofer Elyakim
				
	 /s/ Dror Levy
	 		 		 	
	DSP Group, Ltd.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 

### 129307 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 129307 COA: 259787 Otsego CC: 96-002103-FH JASON LEE SCHWESING, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 24, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report"), I, Andrew T.
      Melton, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May
      20, 2008




By: /s/
      Andrew T.
      Melton


Name:
      Andrew T. Melton


Title:
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# Quarterly Data Series on Business Employment Dynamics

"The Business Employment Dynamics (CEWBD) release presents, for the private sector, the number of job gains from opening establishments and from expanding establishments and the number of job losses from closing establishments and from contracting establishments. These numbers are available by industry, by firm size, and by State. This release is issued quarterly. For more information, visit the Business Employment Dynamics home page at www.bls.gov/bdm/. "

- Gross job losses are 7.8 million in 3rd quarter 2023; gross job gains are 7.6 million
- Gross job gains are 8.1 million in 2nd quarter 2023; gross job losses are 7.8 million
- Gross job gains 8.0 million and gross job losses 7.1 million in the 1st quarter of 2023
- Gross job gains 8.0 million and gross job losses 7.6 million in the 4th quarter of 2022
- Gross job gains 8.8 million and gross job losses 7.5 million in the 3rd quarter of 2022
- Gross job gains 8.3 million and gross job losses 8.5 million in the 2nd quarter of 2022
- Gross job gains 8.4 million and gross job losses 6.9 million in the 1st quarter of 2022
- Gross job gains 9.6 million and gross job losses 6.7 million in the 4th quarter of 2021
- Gross job gains 8.8 million and gross job losses 7.5 million in the 3rd quarter of 2021
- Gross job gains 8.1 million and gross job losses 7.2 million in the 2nd quarter of 2021
- Gross job gains 8.2 million and gross job losses 6.5 million in the 1st quarter of 2021
- Gross job gains 8.8 million and gross job losses 6.7 million in the 4th quarter of 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                    
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         24,215
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  287,085
<ALLOWANCES>                                   37,004
<INVENTORY>                                    44,289
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               361,281
<PP&E>                                         253,871
<DEPRECIATION>                                 125,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,974,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          665,522
<BONDS>                                        1,746,985
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          557,347
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       984,032
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,035,008)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,974,024
<SALES>                                        1,127,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,127,332
<CGS>                                          265,898
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  265,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               778,955
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             105,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (26,141)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (26,141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26,141)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.54)
        


</TABLE>
## **EXHIBIT 32.2**

## ** **

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd.

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd. (the“Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Lloyd Hoffman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o (d));and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | July 30, 2003 |   | BY:    | /S/Lloyd Hoffman        |
|--------|--------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |               |   |   | LLOYD HOFFMAN           |
|   |               |   |   | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |

 

1

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 742

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the age for receipt of 

military retired pay for non-regular service from 60 to 55. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2003

Mr. SAXTON (for himself, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. TURNER of Texas, Ms. MCCOLLUM, 

Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. 

SHIMKUS, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. OSBORNE, Mr. FILNER, Mr. KENNEDY of 

Rhode Island, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. SMITH of Washington, 

Mr. FOLEY, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. BURR, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. MCINTYRE, 

Mr. HOEFFEL, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. CRENSHAW, and Mr. 

SMITH of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the age 

for receipt of military retired pay for non-regular service 

from 60 to 55.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN AGE FOR RECEIPT OF MILITARY 

4 RETIRED PAY FOR NON-REGULAR SERVICE. 

5 (a) REDUCTION IN AGE.—Section 12731(a)(1) of 

6 title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘at 
2

•HR 742 IH 

1 least 60 years of age’’ and inserting ‘‘at least 55 years 

2 of age’’. 

3 (b) APPLICATION TO EXISTING PROVISIONS OF LAW

4 OR POLICY.—With respect to any provision of law, or of 

5 any policy, regulation, or directive of the executive branch, 

6 that refers to a member or former member of the uni7 formed services as being eligible for, or entitled to, retired 

8 pay under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, 

9 but for the fact that the member or former member is 

10 under 60 years of age, such provision shall be carried out 

11 with respect to that member or former member by sub12 stituting for the reference to being 60 years of age a ref13 erence to the age in effect for qualification for such retired 

14 pay under section 12731(a) of title 10, United States 

15 Code, as amended by subsection (a). 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall take effect on the first day of the first 

18 month beginning on or after the date of the enactment 

19 of this Act and shall apply to retired pay payable for that 

20 month and subsequent months.

Æ
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC REPORT




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Seaway Valley Capital
Corporation (the "Company") certifies that:




1. The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter ended June 30, 2008
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/S/
            THOMAS SCOZZAFAVATHOMAS
      SCOZZAFAVAChief
      Executive Officerand
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:
            
            August
      18, 2008










This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.




24
# laucnty06

&8Page &P of &N
# 2003-2017

Fatal occupational injuries incurred by worker at road construction sites in California, 2003-2017 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries incurred by worker at road construction sites in California, 2003-2017		

Fatal occupational injuries incurred by worker at road construction sites in California, 2003-2017 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries incurred by worker at road construction sites in California, 2003-2017		

Page &P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, dated the
date of this Certification (the "Report"), I, J. William Plummer, the
President and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.


Date:  May 13, 2004                    By:  /s/ J. William Plummer
                                            -------------------------------
                                            J. William Plummer
                                            President and Chief Executive
                                            Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to First Federal Bancorp, Inc., and will be retained by First
Federal Bancorp, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>