alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
7 0

Table 28. Percent distribution of employed persons by age, sex, and contingent and noncontingent 

status, February 2001

(Numbers in thousands)

Total, 16 years and over............ 134,605 1.7 2.2 4.0 96.0

 16 to 19 years......................... 6,597 6.3 6.7 9.1 91.0

 20 to 24 years........................ 13,259 4.6 4.9 7.9 92.1

 25 to 34 years........................ 30,079 1.8 2.3 4.0 96.0

 35 to 44 years......................... 36,740 .9 1.5 3.0 97.0

 45 to 54 years........................ 29,946 .8 1.3 2.8 97.2

 55 to 64 years........................ 13,955 .8 1.2 2.8 97.2

 65 years and over.................. 4,029 1.2 1.7 4.9 95.1

Women, 16 years and over......... 63,229 1.8 2.4 4.2 95.8

 16 to 19 years........................ 3,277 7.5 7.9 10.7 89.3

 20 to 24 years........................ 6,481 4.6 5.0 7.9 92.1

 25 to 34 years........................ 13,844 1.5 2.3 4.0 96.0

 35 to 44 years........................ 17,071 1.1 1.7 3.2 96.8

 45 to 54 years......................... 14,379 .9 1.4 2.9 97.1

 55 to 64 years......................... 6,506 .9 1.3 3.2 96.9

 65 years and over..................... 1,671 1.1 1.7 5.9 94.1

Men, 16 years and over............... 71,376 1.6 2.1 3.8 96.2

 16 to 19 years........................ 3,320 5.1 5.6 7.4 92.6

 20 to 24 years........................ 6,778 4.7 4.7 7.8 92.2

 25 to 34 years......................... 16,235 2.0 2.3 4.1 95.9

 35 to 44 years........................ 19,668 .8 1.3 2.7 97.3

 45 to 54 years........................ 15,567 .7 1.3 2.7 97.3

 55 to 64 years........................ 7,449 .8 1.1 2.5 97.5

 65 years and over.................. 2,358 1.2 1.7 4.2 95.8

Age and sex

Contingent workers1

Noncontingent 

workers1 Estimate 1 Estimate 2 Estimate 3 Total employed

1 Contingent workers are those who do not have an

implicit or explicit contract for ongoing employment. Persons who do not expect to continue in their jobs for personal reasons, such as retirement or returning to school,

are not considered contingent workers, provided that they

would have the option of continuing in the job were it not for

these personal reasons. Estimate 1 includes wage and

salary workers who expect their jobs will last for an additional year or less and who had worked at their jobs for 1

year or less. Estimate 2 includes wage and salary workers, the self-employed, and independent contractors who

expect their employment to last for an additional year or less

and who had worked at their jobs (or been self-employed)

for 1 year or less. Estimate 3 includes all workers who do

not expect their jobs to last. This is the broadest definition of

contingency and estimates 1 and 2 of contingency are included in estimate 3. Noncontingent workers are those

workers who do not fall into any of the three definitions of

contingency.
EXHIBIT 13

                           CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION

    In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Infineon Technologies
AG (the "Company") for the annual period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Dr. Wolfgang Ziebart, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter
Fischl, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 26, 2004


                                      /s/ Wolfgang Ziebart
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Dr. Wolfgang Ziebart
                                      Member of the Management Board and
                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                      /s/ Peter Fischl
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Peter Fischl
                                      Member of the Management Board and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1
       a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Edward J. GildeaEdward J. GildeaCEO, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 635

To assure that enrollment in any Medicare prescription drug program is 

voluntary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 

Ways and Means, and Education and the Workforce, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To assure that enrollment in any Medicare prescription drug 

program is voluntary.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ASSURING TOTALLY VOLUNTARY NATURE OF 

4 ENROLLMENT IN ANY MEDICARE PRESCRIP5 TION DRUG PROGRAM. 

6 Enrollment in a prescription drug plan established 

7 under title XVIII of the Social Security Act shall be totally 

8 voluntary and no individual shall be required to enroll in 
2

•HR 635 IH 

1 such a plan as part of any contract with any employer 

2 or under any collective bargaining agreement or otherwise 

3 (including any revision made to any benefit or pension 

4 plan or agreement referred to in section 9701 of the Inter5 nal Revenue Code of 1986, relating to coal industry health 

6 benefits).

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 696

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to restrict the disqualification 

of students for drug offenses to those students who committed offenses 

while receiving student financial aid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2003

Mr. MEEKS of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to restrict 

the disqualification of students for drug offenses to those 

students who committed offenses while receiving student 

financial aid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible Student 

5 Financial Assistance Assurance Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 696 IH 

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION OF DISQUALIFICATION. 

2 Section 484(r)(1) of the Higher Education Act of 

3 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091(r)(1)) is amended by striking ev4 erything preceding the table and inserting the following: 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A student who is convicted 

6 of any offense under any Federal or State law in7 volving the possession or sale or a controlled sub8 stance for conduct that occurred during a period of 

9 enrollment for which the student was receiving any 

10 grant, loan, or work assistance under this title shall 

11 not be eligible to receive such grant, loan, or work 

12 assistance from the date of that conviction for the 

13 period of time specified in the following table:’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**
**Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in hiscapacity as an officer of First Shares Bancorp, Inc. (“First Shares”), that, tohis knowledge:
(1) the Annual Report of First Shares on Form 10-KSB for the period endedDecember 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of FirstShares.
Dated: March 30, 2004                    /s/ Jerry R. Engle   Jerry R. Engle   Chief Executive Officer
Table 21. Average weekly hours at work in all industries and in 

nonagricultural industries by sex, 1976-2008 annual averages 

All industries Nonagricultural industries

Total Women Men Total Women Men

1976....... 38.7 34.1 41.7 38.4 34.1 41.4

1977....... 38.8 34.2 41.9 38.5 34.2 41.6

1978 1

...... 39.0 34.5 42.1 38.7 34.4 41.8

1979......... 38.9 34.5 42.0 38.6 34.4 41.7

1980....... 38.5 34.5 41.5 38.3 34.4 41.2

1981....... 38.1 34.1 41.1 37.9 34.1 40.7

1982......... 38.0 34.1 40.9 37.7 34.0 40.6

1983....... 38.3 34.5 41.2 38.1 34.4 41.0

1984......... 38.8 34.9 41.8 38.6 34.9 41.5

1985......... 39.0 35.2 42.0 38.9 35.2 41.8

1986 1...... 39.1 35.4 42.1 38.9 35.3 41.9

1987....... 39.0 35.3 42.0 38.8 35.3 41.8

1988....... 39.4 35.7 42.4 39.3 35.7 42.2

1989......... 39.6 35.8 42.6 39.4 35.8 42.4

1990 1

...... 39.4 35.8 42.3 39.3 35.8 42.1

1991......... 39.2 35.8 42.0 39.1 35.8 41.9

1992....... 38.9 35.6 41.7 38.8 35.6 41.6

1993......... 39.4 36.0 42.2 39.3 36.0 42.1

1994 1...... 39.2 35.5 42.2 39.1 35.6 42.1

1995....... 39.3 35.6 42.3 39.2 35.7 42.2

1996......... 39.3 35.7 42.3 39.2 35.7 42.2

1997 1...... 39.5 36.0 42.4 39.4 36.0 42.3

1998 1...... 39.3 35.8 42.2 39.2 35.9 42.2

1999 1

...... 39.6 36.2 42.4 39.5 36.2 42.4

2000 1

...... 39.7 36.4 42.5 39.6 36.4 42.4

2001......... 39.2 36.1 41.9 39.2 36.1 41.8

2002....... 39.2 36.0 41.8 39.1 36.1 41.7

2003 1

...... 39.0 35.9 41.7 39.0 35.9 41.6

2004....... 39.0 35.9 41.7 39.0 35.9 41.6

2005....... 39.2 36.1 41.8 39.1 36.1 41.7

2006......... 39.2 36.2 41.8 39.2 36.2 41.7

2007......... 39.2 36.1 41.7 39.1 36.1 41.6

2008 1...... 38.9 36.1 41.3 38.8 36.1 41.2

 

Year

1 The comparability of historical data has been affected at various times by

methodological and conceptual changes in the Current Population Survey

(CPS). For an explanation, see the Historical Comparability documentation

provided at http://www.bls.gov/cps/eetech_methods.pdf.

SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau

of Labor Statistics. 

73
Exhibit 10

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The
Supervisory Board of
Infineon Technologies AG:

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-11670; No. 333-12952 and No. 333-13566) of Infineon Technologies AG
of our report dated October 21, 2002, except for note 32 which is as of November 13, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Infineon Technologies AG and
subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 2002, which report appears in the annual report of Infineon Technologies AG on Form 20-F for the 2002 financial year.

KPMG
Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Munich,
Germany
December 3, 2002

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jeffrey A. Kupp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JEFFREY A. KUPP                                                                                   
|Jeffrey A. Kupp Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: March 15, 2007
73

Table 21. Average weekly hours at work in all industries and in 

nonagricultural industries by sex, 1976–2010 annual averages 

All industries Nonagricultural industries

Total Women Men Total Women Men

1976........... 38.7 34.1 41.7 38.4 34.1 41.4

1977........... 38.8 34.2 41.9 38.5 34.2 41.6

1978 1

.......... 39.0 34.5 42.1 38.7 34.4 41.8

1979........... 38.9 34.5 42.0 38.6 34.4 41.7

1980........... 38.5 34.5 41.5 38.3 34.4 41.2

1981........... 38.1 34.1 41.1 37.9 34.1 40.7

1982........... 38.0 34.1 40.9 37.7 34.0 40.6

1983........... 38.3 34.5 41.2 38.1 34.4 41.0

1984.......... 38.8 34.9 41.8 38.6 34.9 41.5

1985........... 39.0 35.2 42.0 38.9 35.2 41.8

1986 1

.......... 39.1 35.4 42.1 38.9 35.3 41.9

1987........... 39.0 35.3 42.0 38.8 35.3 41.8

1988............ 39.4 35.7 42.4 39.3 35.7 42.2

1989........... 39.6 35.8 42.6 39.4 35.8 42.4

1990 1

.......... 39.4 35.8 42.3 39.3 35.8 42.1

1991........... 39.2 35.8 42.0 39.1 35.8 41.9

1992........... 38.9 35.6 41.7 38.8 35.6 41.6

1993.......... 39.4 36.0 42.2 39.3 36.0 42.1

1994 1

.......... 39.2 35.5 42.2 39.1 35.6 42.1

1995.......... 39.3 35.6 42.3 39.2 35.7 42.2

1996.......... 39.3 35.7 42.3 39.2 35.7 42.2

1997 1.......... 39.5 36.0 42.4 39.4 36.0 42.3

1998 1

.......... 39.3 35.8 42.2 39.2 35.9 42.2

1999 1.......... 39.6 36.2 42.4 39.5 36.2 42.4

2000 1

........... 39.7 36.4 42.5 39.6 36.4 42.4

2001........... 39.2 36.1 41.9 39.2 36.1 41.8

2002........... 39.2 36.0 41.8 39.1 36.1 41.7

2003 1

........... 39.0 35.9 41.7 39.0 35.9 41.6

2004........... 39.0 35.9 41.7 39.0 35.9 41.6

2005........ 39.2 36.1 41.8 39.1 36.1 41.7

2006............................... 39.2 36.2 41.8 39.2 36.2 41.7

2007............................... 39.2 36.1 41.7 39.1 36.1 41.6

2008 1

........... 38.9 36.1 41.3 38.8 36.1 41.2

2009 ........... 37.9 35.3 40.2 37.8 35.3 40.1

2010 ........... 38.2 35.5 40.5 38.1 35.6 40.4

 

Year

 1 The comparability of historical data has been affected at various times by

methodological and conceptual changes in the Current Population Survey (CPS). 

For an explanation, see the historical comparability documentation provided at

http://www.bls.gov/cps/eetech_methods.pdf.

 SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 

73
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                                  CERTIFICATION

                          Chase Credit Card Owner Trust
                           Series 2000-1 (the "Trust")

I, Patricia M. Garvey, a vice president in charge of the reports of the
servicing function of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association for the
above-referenced Trust, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the
         Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, for inclusion in
         these reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
         under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon
         my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, and except as
         disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
         under the pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement; and

5.       This annual report discloses all significant deficiencies relating to
         the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
         upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, that is included
         in this annual report.



Date:    March 28, 2003


  /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
------------------------
Name:    Patricia M. Garvey
Title:   Vice President
Company:   Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
EX-10.67



 Exhibit 10.67 
 February 13, 2013 
 R.S.K. Chaganti, Ph.D. 

 

	Re:	Promissory Note dated May 19, 2006 (the “Note”) 

 Dear Dr. Chaganti: 
 This letter agreement will memorialize your agreement
with respect to $100,000 of the outstanding principal amount of your loan to Cancer Genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), made pursuant to the Note, plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon (such accrued and unpaid
interest plus the outstanding principal amount, the “Conversion Amount”). The promises set forth in this letter agreement are made to induce us and our underwriters to proceed with the initial public offering, which is also beneficial to
you. 
 You hereby irrevocably agree to convert the Conversion Amount into shares of common stock of the Company effective upon
the consummation of the Company’s initial public offering and that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Note, the conversion price shall be equal to the initial public offering price per share. 

Very truly yours, 
 /s/ Panna L. Sharma 
 Panna L. Sharma 

President and CEO 
 Agreed to and Accepted by: 
 By:  /s/ R.S.K. Chaganti, Ph.D. 

R.S.K. Chaganti, Ph.D.
# 106-IS 

# ELECTRONICRECORD %Q*lmlS
COA# 02-14-00513-CR OFFENSE: 21.11 Karl Dean Jackson v. The State of 

## STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Tarrant COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 396th District Court 

### DATE: 06/25/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1319320D



## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Karl Dean Jackson v. The State of 

## STYLE: Texas 

# APPELLAMT\<> Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# Q?kt/; DATE: JUDGE: 

## ru.

# ~z Jo/r CCA#: 

# *66-/£ CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP:
MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit
32.1





Written
Statement of the President and Treasurer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2008 (the “Report”) by Westergaard.Com, Inc. ("Registrant"),
the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








Date: 
February 13, 2009





/s/  Anne Straton


Anne
Straton


President
& Treasurer








A
signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to Westergaard.Com, Inc and will be retained by Westergaard.Com,
Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Celluloid Manuf’g Co. *v.*American Zylonite Co. and others.1

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

June 15, 1886.)

Patents for Inventions—Petition for Rehearing.

Petition for rehearing, upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence on the question of public use, denied, and the opinion expressed on the former • hearing, 26 Fed. Rep. 692, adhered to.

Petition for Rehearing.

*Horace M. Ruggles*and *Benj. F. Thurston,*for the petition.

*Frederic H. Betts*and *Wm. D. Shipman,*against the petition.

1

**Edited by Charles C. Linthicum, Esq., of the Chicago bar.

Shipman, J.

This is a petition by the defendants for a rehearing, upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence upon the question of the public use in this country of the patented invention for more .than two years before the application for a patent. The affidavits show that more dental plates were sold by the Albany Dental Plate Company before October, 1872, than I had supposed, and that all were not of poor quality, and that the patentees caused to be issued, in *751187 L and 1872, laudatory advertisements in regard to the perfection of their celluloid dental plates, and that some dentists thought them satisfactory. Their advertisements and opinions do not make, much impression upon my mind, because I am somewhat familiar with the opposition of dentists to the dental vulcanite patent. I am satisfied, that this defense, always one which must be clearly proved, cannot be made out, because I do not think that the inventors, before they started their Newark factory in the spring of 1873, wore themselves sure how to obtain a result which should be both certain and satis-, factory, and I do not think that they attained, prior to 1873, any uniformity of result, either good or poor, except in the minds of persons who were very anxious that celluloid should be a success. The affidavits upon both sides, taken as a whole, tend to confirm my previous opinion that this defense cannot be sustained.

The petition for rehearing upon the ground of newly-discovered ev* idence is denied.