alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5307 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5307

To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated 
       by pink lights in honor of breast cancer awareness month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2004

Mr. Costello (for himself, Mr. Shimkus, Mrs. Emerson, and Mr. Gephardt) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated 
       by pink lights in honor of breast cancer awareness month.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ILLUMINATION OF GATEWAY ARCH IN HONOR OF BREAST CANCER 
              AWARENESS MONTH.

    In honor of breast cancer awareness month, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be 
illuminated by pink lights for a certain period of time in October, to 
be designated by the Secretary of the Interior.
                                 <all>
```
# Contracted workers in CA

Fatal occupational injuries to contracted workers in California, 2011-18 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries to contracted workers in California, 2011-18		

Fatal occupational injuries to contracted workers in California, 2011-18 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries to contracted workers in California, 2011-18		

Page &P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary L. DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7313.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 18, 2012.

Gary L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary L. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a second sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Davis,*No. 3:90-cr-00085-MOC-7 (W.D.N.C. July 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *225in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1707
ZIAD AKL, M.D., F.A.C.P., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM DOUGHERTY, M.D.; BETH DYSON-MUSKOPF, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00264-CMH) Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 27, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ziad Akl, Appellant Pro Se. Karen-Faye McTavish, SHAW PITTMAN, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ziad Akl appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint in this diversity action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s ruling that the complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. Akl v. Dougherty , No. 1:06-cv00264-CMH (E.D. Va. filed June 7, 2006 & entered June 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Mag. No. 11-4022

DANIEL SPITLER ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having come before the Court on the joint

application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the

District of New Jersey (Lee Vartan and Zach Intrater, Assistant

U.S. rn, appearing), and defendant Daniel Spitler (SusanCassell., Eeq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance of

the proceedings in the above-captioned matter to permit defensecounsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparationin this matter and to allow the parties to conduct plea

negotiations and attempt to finalize a plea agreement, and the

defendant being aware that the, defendant has the right to have

the matter submitted to a grand jury within thirty days of the

date of the defendant’s arrest, pursuant to Title 18, UnitedStates Code, Section 3161(b), and. the defendant having consented

to the continuance and waived such right, and for good cause

shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should

be continued for the following reasons

(I) The charges in this case are the result of a

lengthy investigation, and the discovery involves highly
permitted a reasonable ainouxit of additional time for effective

preparation in this matter;

(3) The parties anticipate that plea negotiations may

begin shortly;

(4) As a result of the foregoing, pursuant to Title

18, united States Code, Section 3161(h) (7), the ends of justice

served by granting the continuance outweigh the beet interest of

the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

xr IS, therefore, on this day of 7anuary, 2011,

ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued

for a period from the date of this Order through March 31, 2011;

and it is further

-2-
HON. CLAIRE C. CECCI4I

United States Magistrate Judge

Form and entry

consented to:

Zach Iritrater

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Susan Cassell

Counsel for defendant Daniel Spitler

-3-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6696]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Arshile Gorky: A Retrospective,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA, from on or about October 8, 2009, until on or about January 10, 2010; at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about June 6, 2010, until on or about September 6, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: July 9, 2009.

C. Miller Crouch,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-16934 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit
32.1





EXTERRAN
PARTNERS, L.P.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Exterran Partners, L.P.
(the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Stephen A.
Snider, as Chief Executive Officer of Exterran GP LLC, the general partner of
the Partnership’s general partner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
his knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





/s/ Stephen A.
Snider


Stephen
A. Snider


Chief
Executive Officer, Exterran GP LLC


As General Partner of Exterran General Partner, L.P.


As General Partner of Exterran Partners,
L.P.





November
6, 2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Organic  Soils.com, Inc. a Nevada
corporation  (the  "Company"),  on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  annual period ending
December  31,  2004  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"),  I, Ray L. Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of  the  Company,  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350),  that  to  my  knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m  or  78o(d));  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.



                                        By: /s/ Ray  L.  Smith
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Ray  L.  Smith
                                        Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                                        Chief  Financial  Officer
Date: February 24, 2005
Table 28. Percent distribution of employed persons by age, sex, and contingent and 

noncontingent status, February 2005

Total, 16 years and over......... 138,952 1.8 2.3 4.1 95.9

 16 to 19 years................... 5,510 5.6 6.1 8.6 91.4

 20 to 24 years................... 13,114 4.6 5.2 8.2 91.8

 25 to 34 years..................... 30,103 2.3 2.9 4.8 95.2

 35 to 44 years..................... 34,481 1.2 1.7 3.0 97.0

 45 to 54 years................... 32,947 .8 1.2 2.7 97.3

 55 to 64 years..................... 17,980 .8 1.1 3.0 97.0

 65 years and over............... 4,817 1.6 2.3 5.2 94.8

Women, 16 years and over... 65,006 1.8 2.4 4.3 95.7

 16 to 19 years..................... 2,931 5.6 6.2 8.4 91.6

 20 to 24 years..................... 6,186 4.0 4.8 7.8 92.2

 25 to 34 years..................... 13,480 2.2 2.7 4.6 95.4

 35 to 44 years..................... 15,958 1.1 1.7 3.2 96.8

 45 to 54 years................... 15,754 1.1 1.6 3.2 96.8

 55 to 64 years................... 8,495 .9 1.1 3.2 96.8

 65 years and over.............. 2,202 2.6 3.5 7.2 92.8

Men, 16 years and over......... 73,946 1.8 2.2 3.9 96.1

 16 to 19 years..................... 2,579 5.6 6.1 8.9 91.2

 20 to 24 years..................... 6,928 5.2 5.7 8.6 91.4

 25 to 34 years..................... 16,624 2.4 3.1 5.0 95.0

 35 to 44 years..................... 18,523 1.3 1.6 2.9 97.1

 45 to 54 years..................... 17,193 .6 .8 2.1 97.9

 55 to 64 years..................... 9,485 .7 1.1 2.8 97.2

 65 years and over............... 2,615 .7 1.3 3.5 96.5

Estimate 1 Estimate 2 Estimate 3

Age and sex

Total 

employed 

(in 

thousands)

Contingent workers1

Noncontingent 

workers1

1 Contingent workers are those who do not have

an implicit or explicit contract for ongoing

employment. Persons who do not expect to continue

in their jobs for personal reasons, such as retirement

or returning to school, are not considered contingent

workers, provided that they would have the option of

continuing in the job were it not for these personal

reasons. Estimate 1 includes wage and salary

workers who expect their jobs will last for an

additional year or less and who had worked at their

jobs for 1 year or less. Estimate 2 includes wage

and salary workers, the self-employed, and

independent contractors who expect their

employment to last for an additional year or less and 

who had worked at their jobs (or been selfemployed) for 1 year or less. Estimate 3 includes

all workers who do not expect their jobs to last.

This is the broadest definition of contingency and

estimates 1 and 2 of contingency are included in

estimate 3. Noncontingent workers are those

workers who do not fall into any of the three

definitions of contingency.

 

SOURCE: Contingent and alternative work

arrangements supplement to the Current

Population Survey, February 2005, U.S.

Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor

Statistics.

83
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2008
    /s/ Bernard RetterathBernard Retterath,Treasurer  (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Burden, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Playbox (US) Inc., (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
      the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                              



| | By:    | /s/
      Robert Burden    
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | Robert Burden              
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | September 18, 2007         

---
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, March
Clancy, the Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
  Dated: April 4, 2005/s/ Mark ClancyName: Mark ClancyTitle:
      Chief Executive and Financial Officer
NOTE: Data are from the March 1970-2005 Current Population Survey and are for persons age 25-64. Beginning in 1992, data 

are based on highest diploma or degree received; prior to this time, data were based on years of school completed.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 2-1. The educational attainment of the labor force has 

improved over time

1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003

Percent of labor force

Bachelor's degree and higher 

Some college or associate degree 

High school graduates, no college

Less than a high school diploma

0

20

40

60

80

100

Chart 2-1. The educational attainment of the labor force has 

improved over time

• Education is an important determinant of labor market outcomes. The more 

education a person has, the more likely he or she is to be in the labor force and 

the less likely he or she is to be unemployed. 

• The proportion of persons 25 to 64 years old with some college (or an 

associate degree) more than doubled between 1970 and 2005. The share with 

a bachelor’s degree and higher also more than doubled over the period. In 

contrast, the share of the labor force with less than a high school diploma 

declined markedly.
Case 3:11-cv-03731-FLW-TJB   Document 71   Filed 04/30/14   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 1966

Case 3:11-cv-03731-FLW-TJB   Document 71   Filed 04/30/14   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 1967

Case 3:11-cv-03731-FLW-TJB   Document 71   Filed 04/30/14   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 1968
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BARRY ROSS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 9 MM 2024

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2024, the “Application for Extraordinary Relief” 

and the “Motion for Summary Judgment” are DENIED.
#### Eric Emanuel TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA IN the UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-2288.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.

Decided: Dec. 18, 2012.

Eric Emanuel Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Emanuel Taylor appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice for failure to state a claim his civil complaint against the Commonwealth of Virginia. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Taylor does not challenge in his informal brief the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*