alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

34. Unemployed jobseekers by sex, reason for unemployment, and active jobsearch methods used

[Numbers in thousands]

Sex and reason

2018

Unemployed Percent of jobseekers using method

Average

number of

methods

used

Total Jobseekers

Contacted

employer

directly

Sent out

resumes

or filled

out

applications

Placed

or

answered

ads

Contacted

friends

or

relatives

Public

employment

agency

Private

employment

agency

Other

Total unemployed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,314 5,461 50.2 55.0 14.1 23.8 14.5 8.1 13.5 1.8

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,990 2,138 52.4 55.2 16.2 27.6 19.0 10.9 14.3 2.0

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 794 794 52.9 57.8 13.5 21.9 13.2 6.8 11.9 1.8

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,928 1,928 47.4 52.8 12.8 21.3 11.6 6.8 13.9 1.7

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 602 602 48.2 57.8 11.4 20.8 9.3 4.5 11.3 1.6

Men. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,398 2,899 51.7 52.6 14.3 25.1 14.8 8.3 13.6 1.8

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,772 1,273 54.4 52.3 16.2 28.4 18.4 10.6 14.4 2.0

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413 413 53.1 54.6 12.9 22.9 14.1 7.3 11.5 1.8

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 896 48.5 50.1 13.7 22.8 12.4 6.8 14.6 1.7

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 317 48.4 58.2 9.9 21.2 8.1 4.1 10.6 1.6

Women. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,916 2,562 48.6 57.8 13.9 22.3 14.2 8.0 13.3 1.8

Job losers and persons who completed

temporary jobs1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,218 864 49.4 59.5 16.3 26.3 20.1 11.3 14.1 2.0

Job leavers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 381 52.7 61.3 14.1 20.7 12.3 6.3 12.4 1.8

Reentrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,032 1,032 46.5 55.1 12.0 20.1 11.0 6.7 13.3 1.7

New entrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 285 48.0 57.3 13.0 20.4 10.8 5.0 12.1 1.7

1 Data on the number of jobseekers and the jobsearch methods used exclude persons on temporary layoff.

NOTE: The jobseekers total is less than the total unemployed because it does not include persons on temporary layoff. The percent using each method will always total

more than 100 because many jobseekers use more than one method. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Matthew C. Smith, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 440]

Kavanagh, J.

Defendant was charged in two separate indictments with the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree after selling cocaine to an undercover police officer in April and June 2006. Following consolidation of the indictments, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in full satisfaction of the charges. Consistent with the plea agreement, County Court sentenced him as a second felony offender to a prison term of 3V2 years, with three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

*1033We affirm. Defendant’s challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is unpreserved for our review given his failure to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction *(see People v*Folk, 43 AD3d 1229, 1230 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 1033 [2008]; *People v Brill,*42 AD3d 823, 823 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 960 [2007]). In any event, even assuming that defendant’s contention that County Court misrepresented the maximum sentence defendant was facing under the indictments at his arraignment is correct, inaccurate information concerning sentence exposure is not dispositive of whether a plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered *(see People v Garcia,*92 NY2d 869, 870 [1998]). Furthermore, as our review of the record reveals no evidence that defendant relied on this information in entering his plea, we are convinced that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea *(see People v Wilkinson,*151 AD2d 801, 802 [1989], *lv denied*74 NY2d 821 [1989]). Finally, as both indictments are for offenses defined by the same statutory provision, we find that County Court acted within its discretion in consolidating the indictments pursuant to the People’s application *(see*CPL 200.20 [2] [c]; [4]; *People v Ferrer,*17 AD3d 777, 777 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 788 [2005]).

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Carpinello and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 20, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41456

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDUARDO GARCIA-CAVAZOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-199-ALL 

--------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eduardo Garcia-Cavazos challenges his guilty-plea conviction

and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia-Cavazos’s argument that his

prior burglary conviction in Texas does not qualify as a crime of

violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) has been rejected by

this court. See United States v. Garcia-Mendez, 420 F.3d 454,

456-57 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1398 (2006). 
No. 05-41456

-2-

Garcia-Cavazos’s argument that this court did not properly apply

the categorical analysis of Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575

(1990), is tantamount to arguing that Garcia-Mendez was wrongly

decided. Garcia-Mendez resolved the issue raised in this case;

one panel of this court may not ignore the precedent set by a

prior panel. United States v. Ruiz, 180 F.3d 675, 676 (5th Cir.

1999). 

Garcia-Cavazos also argues that the “felony” and “aggravated

felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are

unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Garcia-Cavazos contends that Almendarez-Torres was

incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court

would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have

repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that

Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v.

Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S.

Ct. 298 (2005). Garcia-Cavazos properly concedes that his

argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for review by the

Supreme Court. 

AFFIRMED.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 529

To reinstate and transfer a hydroelectric license under the Federal Power 

Act to permit the immediate redevelopment of a hydroelectric project 

located in the State of New York, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2003

Mr. SWEENEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To reinstate and transfer a hydroelectric license under the 

Federal Power Act to permit the immediate redevelopment of a hydroelectric project located in the State of 

New York, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 The Congress finds that it is in the public interest 

5 to have reinstated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Com6 mission (‘‘FERC’’) the hydroelectric license for Project 

7 No. 2696 and to have FERC transfer the license to the 
2

•HR 529 IH 

1 Town of Stuyvesant, New York, in order to utilize the hy2 draulic potential of waters of the United States. 

3 SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT AND TRANSFER. 

4 (a) REINSTATEMENT AND TRANSFER OF FEDERAL

5 LICENSE FOR PROJECT NUMBERED 2696.—Notwith6 standing section 8 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

7 801) or any other provision of such Act, the Federal En8 ergy Regulatory Commission (‘‘FERC’’) is directed to re9 instate the license for Project No. 2696 and to transfer 

10 the license, without delay or the institution of any pro11 ceedings, to the Town of Stuyvesant, New York, holder 

12 of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Preliminary 

13 Permit No. 11787, within 30 days of enactment of this 

14 Act. 

15 (b) HYDROELECTRIC INCENTIVES.—Project No. 

16 2696 shall be entitled to the full benefit of any legislation 

17 passed by Congress that promotes hydroelectric develop18 ment within 2 years either before or after this Act’s effec19 tive date. 

20 (c) PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING.—The 

21 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (‘‘FERC’’) shall 

22 permit the town to add as a co-licensee any private or pub23 lic entity or entities to the reinstated license at any time, 

24 notwithstanding the issuance of a preliminary permit to 

25 the Town of Stuyvesant and any consideration of munic-
3

•HR 529 IH 

1 ipal preference. The town shall be entitled, to the extent 

2 that funds are available or shall be made available, to re3 ceive loans under sections 402 and 403 of the Public Util4 ity Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 2702 and 

5 2703), or similar programs, for the reimbursement of fea6 sibility studies, or development costs, or both, incurred 

7 since January 1, 2001, through and including December 

8 31, 2006. All power produced by the project shall be 

9 deemed incremental hydropower for purpose of qualifying 

10 for any energy credit or similar benefits.

Æ
H. R. 5360

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To authorize grants to establish academies for teachers and students of American

history and civics, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American History and Civics

Education Act of 2004’’.

SEC. 2. PRESIDENTIAL ACADEMIES FOR TEACHING OF AMERICAN HISTORY AND CIVICS; CONGRESSIONAL ACADEMIES FOR

STUDENTS OF AMERICAN HISTORY AND CIVICS.

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Education (referred to

in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’) may award not more than 12 grants,

on a competitive basis—

(1) to entities to establish Presidential Academies for

Teaching of American History and Civics that may offer workshops for both veteran and new teachers of American history

and civics; and

(2) to entities to establish Congressional Academies for

Students of American History and Civics.

(b) APPLICATION.—An entity that desires to receive a grant

under subsection (a) shall submit an application to the Secretary

at such time, in such manner, and containing such information

as the Secretary may require.

(c) DEMONSTRATED EXPERTISE.—The Secretary shall require

that each entity, to be eligible to receive a grant under this section,

demonstrate expertise in historical methodology or the teaching

of history.

(d) AVAILABLE FUNDS.—To carry out this section, the Secretary

may use any funds appropriated for fiscal year 2005 or any subsequent fiscal year to carry out part D of title V of the Elementary

and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7241 et seq.).
H. R. 5360—2

SEC. 3. NATIONAL HISTORY DAY PROGRAM.

The Secretary may award grants to the National History Day

Program for the purpose of continuing and expanding its activities

to promote the study of history and improve instruction.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MedQuist Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tim
Stack, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

  /s/ Tim Stack
-------------------------------------
Tim Stack
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 5, 2003
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 4, 2020

b1028

Order 

Clerk

November 4, 2020

160819

MBK CONSTRUCTORS, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant- Appellee,

v SC: 160819

COA: 344079

Washtenaw CC: 15-001232-CH

LISA LIPCAMAN,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff- Appellee,

and

GERDA LIPCAMAN, 

Defendant/Counterplaintiff- Appellant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 11

                          IBAH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                  (unaudited)

A calculation for the six and three months period ended June 30, 1997 and for 
the six months ended June 30, 1996 has not been presented since the effect of 
any preferred stock conversion, and the effect of option and warrant exercises 
would be anti-dilutive.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         FOR THE THREE
                                                         MONTHS ENDED
COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY                                       JUNE 30, 
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:                                  1996
----------------------------                             -------------
<S>                                                      <C>
Net Income Applicable to Common Stockholders               $   152,000
                                                         =============

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding        17,643,000

Assumed Conversion of Preferred Stock                        2,309,000

Assumed Conversion of Options and Warrants                   4,849,000
                                                         -------------
                                                            24,801,000
                                                         =============
Primary Net Income per Share                               $      0.01
                                                         =============
</TABLE>

Fully-diluted net income per common share for the three months ended June 30, 
1996 is the same as primary net income per common share calculated above.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 11-4558

____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

MARCUS WILLIAMS,

 Appellant

____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. No. 11-cr-00421)

District Judge: Honorable Susan D. Wigenton

____________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

July 10, 2012

Before: FUENTES, HARDIMAN, and ROTH, Circuit Judges.

____________

JUDGMENT

____________

This cause came on to be considered on the record from the United States District 

Court for the District of New Jersey and was submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 

34.1(a) on July 10, 2012. On consideration whereof, it is now hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgment of the United States 

District Court for the District of New Jersey entered December 22, 2011, be and the same 

is hereby AFFIRMED. All of the above in accordance with the opinion of this Court. No 

costs shall be taxed.

Case 2:11-cr-00421-SDW Document 32 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 91
2

ATTEST:

/s/Marcia M. Waldron, 

Clerk

Dated: July 19, 2012

Case 2:11-cr-00421-SDW Document 32 Filed 07/19/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 92
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

DESIGN CONCEPT ITALIA, INC.,

Appellant,
v. WHITNEY R. DI BONA and GARRETT M. DI BONA, Jointly and Individually, Appellees. No. 2D23-1983
April 3, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Richard Martin, Judge. David A. Townsend of Townsend & Brannon, Tampa, for Appellant. Whitney Ray Di Bona of Maune Raichle Hartley French & Mudd, LLC, Tampa, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. ATKINSON, and SMITH, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
20. Persons at work 1 to 34 hours in all and in nonagricultural industries by reason for working less than 35 hours

and usual full- or part-time status

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason for working less than 35 hours

2008

All industries Nonagricultural industries

Total

Usually

 work

full time

Usually

 work

part time

Total

Usually

 work

full time

Usually

 work

part time

 Total, 16 years and over ................................................................... 33,384 10,426 22,959 32,836 10,256 22,580

Economic reasons ................................................................................ 5,875 2,259 3,616 5,773 2,198 3,575

 Slack work or business conditions ...................................................... 4,169 2,006 2,163 4,097 1,962 2,135

 Could only find part-time work ............................................................ 1,389 - 1,389 1,380 - 1,380

 Seasonal work .................................................................................... 190 126 64 171 111 60

 Job started or ended during week ...................................................... 127 127 - 125 125 -

Noneconomic reasons .......................................................................... 27,509 8,166 19,343 27,063 8,058 19,005

 Child-care problems ........................................................................... 753 70 683 750 70 680

 Other family or personal obligations ................................................... 5,425 725 4,700 5,354 716 4,638

 Health or medical limitations ............................................................... 834 - 834 814 - 814

 In school or training ............................................................................ 6,057 98 5,959 5,985 96 5,888

 Retired or Social Security limit on earnings ........................................ 2,185 - 2,185 2,089 - 2,089

 Vacation or personal day .................................................................... 3,431 3,431 - 3,399 3,399 -

 Holiday, legal or religious ................................................................... 844 844 - 836 836 -

 Weather-related curtailment ............................................................... 454 454 - 433 433 -

 All other reasons ................................................................................. 7,525 2,543 4,982 7,404 2,508 4,896

Average hours:

Economic reasons .............................................................................. 22.9 23.8 22.4 23.0 23.8 22.4

 Other reasons ..................................................................................... 21.4 25.1 19.8 21.4 25.1 19.8

 NOTE: Detail may not sum to total due to rounding. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data. Dash indicates no

data or data that do not meet publication criteria. 

232