alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TOBIN v. WKRZ, Inc.

Civ. No. 9909.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

Jan. 18, 1952.

See also, 12 F.R.D. 200.

William S. Tyson, Sol., Washington, D. C., Ernest N. Votaw, Regional Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Kenneth E. Rennekamp, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

STEWART, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action on behalf of a former employee of the defendant to recover unpaid minimum wage compensation due under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. The case is now before the Court on defendant’s motion for a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. following § 723c.

*200Subsequent to the filing of defendant’s motion, plaintiff filed an amended complaint in an effort to satisfy defendant’s objections. However, the defendant argues that the original complaint, together with the amendment, shows that, in certain weeks, there was no violation of the minimum wage provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiff, on the other hand, argues that defendant’s calculations of amount with respect to the minimum wages are wrong, and that, in any event, such a position is a matter of defense and should not be raised on a motion for a more definite statement.

The requirements with respect to the particularity of a complaint under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are clear, and have been set forth by this Court in the case of American Ship Building Co. v. Kirk, D.C.W.D.Pa.1951, 11 F.R.D. 366. It is our opinion that the complaint in this case satisfies the requirements of particularity and that it is sufficiently definite to enable the defendant to frame an answer. Furthermore, we agree with the plaintiff that the objection raised by the defendant is a matter of defense to be pleaded and does not constitute a valid reason for requiring a more definite statement.

Therefore, defendant’s motion for a more definite statement will be denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kim R. Payne, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Kim R.  Payne                                   |     |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|----------|--------|
| Kim R. Payne                                        |     |
| *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* | * * |

 

August 7, 2007

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to theextent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
[Nos. 31968-3-II; 32841-1-II; 31092-9-II.

Division Two.

November 1, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Aundre Herron, *Appellant.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pacific County, No. 92-1-00196-7, Joel M. Penoyar, J., entered June 25, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., and Armstrong, J.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skagit State Bancorp, Inc.  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Cheryl Bishop, President and Chief Executive Officer, andCarla F. Tucker, Executive Vice-President/Chief Financial Officer, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ Cheryl R. Bishop                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Cheryl R. Bishop                       |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|                                   |   |
|                                   |   |
| /s/ Carla F. Tucker                    |   |
| Carla F. Tucker                        |   |
| Executive  Vice-President              |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                |   |
|                                   |   |
|                                   |   |
| May 11, 2010                      |   |
| Date                                   |   |

 

----
Exhibit 23.0

                       CONSENT OF CLIFTON D. BODIFORD, CPA






               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


         I consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements Nos. 333-68214, 333-56816 and 333- 43174 on Form S-8 of DutchFork
Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated October 31, 2002 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of DutchFork Bancshares, Inc. as of September 30,
2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then
ended.




                                                   /s/ Clifton D. Bodiford, CPA
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Clifton D. Bodiford, CPA



Columbia, South Carolina
December 26, 2002
Amended and Restated Exhibit A to the Investment Management Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.12 
 EXHIBIT A 
 FEE SCHEDULE 

AMENDED AND RESTATED as of January 1, 2013 
 This Amended and Restated Exhibit A is effective as of January 1, 2013, and is attached to and made a part of the Investment Management Agreement between Stateco Financial Services, Inc.
(“Stateco”) and Meridian Security Insurance Company effective June 1, 2001. 
 Agreement 

Except as amended or modified by mutual agreement of the parties hereto, Stateco shall be paid an investment management
fee every quarter based on a percentage of the average asset value of invested assets which average shall be calculated by adding the market value of invested assets at the beginning of the quarter and at the end of the quarter, dividing that sum by
two. The fee will be paid within forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar quarter. 
 The annual
fee for fixed instruments including bonds (taxable and tax-free), invested cash and preferred stock is 20 basis points or .002 times the average asset value of that category of invested asset. 

The annual fee for all common stock portfolios is 50 basis points or .005 times the average asset value of that category
of invested assets. 
 In addition, as respects the common stock portfolios, Stateco shall be entitled to a
performance bonus based on the performance of the common stock portfolios determined in the following manner. 

In the event the total return on any common stock portfolio exceeds for a particular quarter the total return for the
S&P 500 for the same quarter, Stateco shall be paid an annual bonus of 10 basis points or .001 times the portion of the average asset value of the particular portfolio which exceeds the asset value of the same portfolio calculated based on the
actual total performance of the S&P 500 for the quarter in question. 
  

			
	 STATECO FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Robert P. Restrepo, Jr.

		 	 President

	
	MERIDIAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Robert P. Restrepo, Jr.

		 	 President


 Agreemen/Investment Management-Meridian Security Fee Schedule 12-12
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No’s. 333-47646, 333-55504, 333-74768, 333-120091and 333-130571) of Microtune, Inc. of our reports dated February 28, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Microtune, Inc., Microtune, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Microtune, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

February 28, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 30, 2010 

d1124 

Order 

 

November 30, 2010 

141825 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 141825 

 COA: 299980 

Isabella CC: 10-000054-FC 

DANIEL DANNY LEONARD, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

AMENDMENT TO ORDER 

 On order of the Court, this Court’s October 26, 2010 order is amended, to correct a 

clerical error, and reads as follows: 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 3, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 CORRIGAN, J., states as follows: 

 I would sua sponte reconsider the prosecutor’s application for leave to appeal in 

light of a clerical error that was brought to the Court’s attention after our order denying 

leave entered on October 26, 2010. In this interlocutory appeal, the prosecutor argued 

that the trial court abused its discretion by excluding from trial videotaped interviews of 

the defendant by the police. Both the Court of Appeals and this Court denied the 

prosecutor’s applications for leave to appeal. I concurred in this Court’s decision in part 

because it appeared that the prosecutor failed to provide copies of the videotapes to this 

Court for review. After our order denying leave entered, however, the prosecutor pointed 

out that he had offered copies of the tapes to the Court and had indicated their availability 

on the coversheet of the application. The Court then discovered that an internal filing 

error prevented the information concerning the tapes’ availability from being 

disseminated to the justices. Because the content of the tapes might affect my decision 

concerning whether the trial judge properly excluded them from trial, I would reconsider 

the prosecutor’s application in light of their availability.
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





As
independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 17, 2010 relating to the
financial statements of ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and
2008, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009
and from September 9, 2003 (date of inception) through December 31, 2009,
included in or made part of this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-129884, 333-134280,
333-142701 and 333-160496) and Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-129680, 333-134279,
333-141014, 333-161453, 333-162160 and 333-163517).







/s/ Caturano
and Company, P.C.




Caturano
and Company, P.C.





Boston,
Massachusetts


March 17,
2010
# 17QRTL5_00

# image1.png
##### 



Exhibit 23.1
 (GLJ LOGO)
    GLJ

Petroleum   Consulants
    
    Principal OfficersHarry Jung, P. Eng.President, C.E.O.Dana B. Laustsen, P. Eng.Executive V.P., C.O.O.Keith M. Braaten, P. Eng.Executive V.P.Officers / Vice Presidents:Terry L. Aarsby, P. Eng.Jodi L. Anhorn, P. Eng.Neil I. Dell, P. Eng.David G. Harris, P. Geol.Myron J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng.Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.John H. Stilling, P. Eng.Douglas R. Sutton, P. Eng.James H. Willmon, P. Eng.
 LETTER OF CONSENT
 TO: Ivanhoe Energy Inc.
   Yours very truly,GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.ORIGINALLY SIGNED BYBryan M. Joa, P. Eng.Vice-President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6495]

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 28, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*Technical Information:*                         Cliff Seagroves, 202-647-1395,                         *seagrovescc@state.gov.*

*Legal Information:*                         Susan Benda, 202-647-0308,                         *bendas@state.gov.*

Dated: January 14, 2009.

Eric J. Boswell,

Ambassador, Director of the Office of Foreign Missions and Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security, Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E9-1723 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-43-P
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-151365, 333-138420,
333-134542, 333-124969, 333-123816, 333-108009, 333-91072, 333-91070, 333-72194, 333-55520,
333-39928) on Forms S-8 of Occam Networks, Inc. and subsidiary of our report dated March 2, 2009, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and internal control over financial reporting, included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Occam Networks, Inc. and subsidiary
for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Our
report dated March 2, 2009, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, expressed an opinion that Occam
Networks, Inc. and subsidiary had not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/
SINGERLEWAK LLP

San
Jose, California
March 2, 2009

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

Report of Independent Accountants


JPMorgan Chase Bank, Servicer
and
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., Transferor,
and
The Bank of New York, Trustee

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Servicing of Securitized Credit Card Receivables
that JPMorgan Chase Bank maintained effective internal control over servicing of
securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2001, based upon the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over such functions. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over servicing of the securitized
credit card receivables, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that JPMorgan Chase Bank maintained
effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit card receivables
as of December 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based upon
the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
March 25, 2002
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZZLL Information Technology, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2016, I, Sean Webster, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2016, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2016, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  November 17, 2016

ZZLL Information Technology, Inc..

By:    /s/ Sean Webster

Sean Webster
## **EXHIBIT 32.1**

## ** **

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd.

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Sheldon Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | July 30, 2003 |   | BY:    | /S/Sheldon Hoffman      |
|--------|--------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |               |   |   | SHELDON HOFFMAN         |
|   |               |   |   | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form
10-2SB 9/30/96 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,909,907
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  751,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                   30,371
<INVENTORY>                                    193,789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,953,427
<PP&E>                                         5,555,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,497,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,072,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,204,412
<BONDS>                                        7,277,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,495
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,620,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,072,074
<SALES>                                        3,756,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,756,545
<CGS>                                          2,461,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,308,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               200,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               41,243
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             246,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,192,767)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   14,096
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,206,863)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,206,863)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.21)
        


</TABLE>