alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.6



Report of Independent Accountants


Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank"),
Administrator of the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2000-1



We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over the Administration of the Chase Credit Card
Owner Trust Series 2000-1 (the "Owner Trust"), that Chase Manhattan Bank USA NA
(the "Bank") maintained effective internal control over its administration of
the Certificates held by the Owner Trust and the Notes issued by the Owner Trust
(the "Administration" of the Owner Trust) as of December 31, 2003, based upon
the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. The Bank's management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over the Administration of the Owner Trust. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over the
Administration of the Owner Trust, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over the Administration of the Owner Trust to
future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank maintained effective
internal control over Administration of the Certificates held by the Owner Trust
and the Notes issued by the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based upon the criteria for effective internal
control established in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 29, 2004
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JACOB FAY LUKE, 

### SR. NO. 

### 2024 KW 0148 

### APRIL 19, 2024 In Re: Jacob 

## Fay Luke, Sr., 

### applying for supervisory writs,



### 32nd Judicial 

### District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, 

### No. 794927. BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. 

### Relator failed to include a 

### copy of the 

### habitual offender 

### bill of 

### information, all pertinent minute entries, transcripts of the 

### habitual offender adjudication and 

### sentencing hearings, copies of the complained 

### of documents used in his habitual offender adjudication, and any other portions of the 

### district court record that might support 

### the claims raised in thewrit application. MRT AHP HG



### COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERKOFCOURT 

### FOR THE COURT
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 783

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to carry out a project to widen 

Interstate Route 35 East in Denton County, Texas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to carry out 

a project to widen Interstate Route 35 East in Denton 

County, Texas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Texas Mobility 

5 Improvement Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HIGH PRIORITY HIGHWAY PROJECT, DENTON 

7 COUNTY, TEXAS. 

8 (a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of 

9 Transportation is authorized to carry out a project to 

10 widen from 4 to 6 lanes Interstate Route 35 East between 
2

•HR 783 IH 

1 Farm-to-Market Road 2181 and Lake Lewisville in Den2 ton County, Texas. 

3 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

4 authorized to be appropriated out of the Highway Trust 

5 Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) to carry out 

6 this section $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2004. 

7 (c) TREATMENT AS HIGH PRIORITY PROJECT.—

8 Funds made available to carry out this section shall be 

9 available for obligation in the same manner as if the funds 

10 were allocated to a State under section 117 of title 23, 

11 United States Code, except that the allocation percentages 

12 specified in subsection (b) of that section shall not apply.

Æ
|   | (a) | our periodic report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and our results of operations. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Carlos A. Cabrera |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Carlos A. Cabrera     |
|   | Executive Chairman    |
|   |                  |
| Date:  | March 18, 2013        |

----
# cpsaat26
Exhibit
32.1





CEO
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Focus Enhancements, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brett
Moyer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Brett A.
      MoyerBrett
      A. MoyerChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      15, 2008
Cite as: 595 U. S. ____ (2021) 1 

Statement of SOTOMAYOR, J. 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

MICKEY THOMAS v. DEXTER PAYNE, DIRECTOR, 

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION 

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED 

STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT 

No. 20–7480. Decided October 4, 2021 

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 

 Statement of JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial 

of certiorari. 

A jury convicted petitioner Mickey Thomas of capital 

murder and sentenced him to death. After pursuing relief 

in state court, Thomas filed a timely federal habeas petition. Thomas argued, in part, that he received ineffective

assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to 

investigate and present mitigating evidence during the

penalty phase of his trial. The District Court agreed. Yet 

without giving Thomas an opportunity to respond, the 

Court of Appeals reversed on the basis of a proceduraldefault argument that the State never raised on appeal.

I do not dissent from the denial of certiorari because 

Thomas’ claim does not satisfy this Court’s traditional criteria for granting certiorari. See this Court’s Rule 10. As 

Judge Colloton rightly observed in his dissent from denial 

of rehearing en banc, however, the Court of Appeals’ decision to reverse based on an argument that the State failed 

to make on appeal, and that Thomas never had the opportunity to address, deprived Thomas of “fair notice that the

issue was ‘in play.’” 977 F. 3d 697 (CA8 2020); see Day v. 

McDonough, 547 U. S. 198, 210 (2006) (“Of course, before 

acting on its own initiative, a court must accord the parties

fair notice and an opportunity to present their positions”).

This lack of notice left Thomas without a meaningful opportunity to dispute the grounds on which the court reversed 
 

 

2 THOMAS v. PAYNE 

Statement of SOTOMAYOR, J. 

the District Court’s decision to grant him habeas relief.

Where, as here, a State declines to argue procedural default on appeal, a court of appeals should at a minimum afford a capital petitioner the opportunity to respond and be 

heard before adopting an argument on the State’s behalf.

The denial of certiorari should not be understood to endorse 

the Court of Appeals’ failure to do so here.
# 2011

&8page &P of &N	

# 2012

&8page &P of &N	

# 2013

&8page &P of &N	

# 2014

&8page &P of &N	

# 2015

&8page &P of &N	

# 2016

&8page &P of &N	

# 2017

&8page &P of &N
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Laguna Construction Company, Inc. Under Contract No. FA8903-04-D-8690 APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58292
Carolyn Callaway, Esq.

Carolyn Callaway, P.C. Albuquerque, NM Lt Col James H. Kennedy III, USAF

Air Force ChiefTrial Attorney William M. Lackermann, Jr. Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL By letter dated 30 October 2014, appellant filed Appellant's Request to Withdraw Appeal with Prejudice. By letter dated 21November2014, the government advised that it did not object to a dismissal with prejudice. WHEREFORE, ASBCA No. 58292 is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 26 November 2014

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 58292, Appeal ofLaguna Construction Company, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
ex10_8.htm








Exhibit 10.8


 


SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION







Cash Compensation


 


Directors of Kadant Inc. (the “company”) who are not employees are paid the following fees for serving on our board of directors:


 



	
  

	
·

	
An annual retainer of $50,000, payable in equal monthly installments.







 



	
  

	
·

	
An annual retainer for the non-executive chairman of the board of $50,000, payable in equal monthly installments.







 



	
  

	
·

	
An annual retainer for chairmen of the following committees: audit committee - $8,000; compensation committee - $4,000; nominating and corporate governance committee - $2,500.







 



	
  

	
·

	
Reimbursement of out-of pocket expenses incurred in attending or participating in meetings of our board of directors or its committees.







 


Restricted Stock Units


 


Each of our non-employee directors also receives an annual award of 5,000 restricted stock units (“RSUs”), deliverable in shares of common stock upon vesting.  The RSUs vest in installments of 1,250 shares each on the last day of each of the company’s fiscal quarters during the year. In addition, each of the non-employee directors also receives an award of 10,000 RSUs that vests only in the event that a change-in-control of our company occurs prior to the last day of the first quarter of the 2015 fiscal year.  Any awards, to the extent not previously vested, are forfeited if the recipient is no longer a member of our board of directors on the vesting dates for any reason other than a change-in-control of the company. The vesting of all awards accelerates in the event of a change-in-control of the company.  All awards are made under the company’s shareholder-approved equity incentive plans. The terms and conditions governing these awards are stated in the form of restricted stock unit award agreement for non-employee directors filed as exhibits to the company’s annual report on Form 10-K.


 


Stock Ownership Guidelines


 


Under our stock ownership guidelines adopted in March 2011, our directors are required to hold shares of the company’s common stock equivalent in value to three times their annual cash retainer. Compliance with the guidelines is measured annually following the close of the fiscal year, and directors have five years from the later of adoption of our stock ownership guidelines or their appointment as a director to attain compliance.
### NUMBER 13
- 1 8
- 00 1 31
- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ PORT CITY IMPORTS, I NC. D/B/A AUTONATION Appellants, HONDA SOUTH CORPUS C HRISTI; AN CORPUS CHRISTI CHEVROLET, L P, CORPUS CHRISTI, L P; AN MOTORS ON SOUTH P ADRE, LP, AN MOTORS ON SOUTH PADRE F/K/A AN CORPUS CHRISTI CHEVROLET, LP ,

v.
ARACELIA HINOJOSA , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justice s Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides
Appellant s , Port City Imports, Inc. d/b/a AutoNation Honda South Corpus Christi;

A N Corpus Christi Chevrolet, LP, Corpus Christi, LP; AN Motors on South Padre, LP, AN2

Motors on South Padre f/k/a AN Corpus Christi Chevrolet, LP , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause

number 2015CCV

- 61538

- 4 . The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal

. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to
dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant s

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will
issue forthwith.
GINA M. BENAVIDES , Justice
Delivered and filed the 20th day of September , 201 8

.
# laucnty90

&8Page &P of &N
Case 3:11-mj-02525-DEA   Document 30   Filed 02/26/14   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 71

Case 3:11-mj-02525-DEA   Document 30   Filed 02/26/14   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 72

Case 3:11-mj-02525-DEA   Document 30   Filed 02/26/14   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 73
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 561 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 561

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain manufacturing equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain manufacturing equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking heading 
9902.84.81 and inserting in numerical sequence the following new 
heading:

      

``    9902.84.81    Shearing          Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     machines used                                                           31/2005          ''
                     to cut metallic                                                                           .
                     tissue
                     certified for
                     use in
                     production of
                     radial tires
                     designed for
                     off-the highway
                     use with a rim
                     measuring 63.5
                     cm or more in
                     diameter
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     4011.20.10,
                     4011.61.00,
                     4011.63.00,
                     4011.69.00,
                     4011.92.00,
                     4011.94.40, or
                     4011.99.45),
                     numerically
                     controlled, or
                     parts thereof
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     8462.31.00 or
                     8466.94.85)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Chart 3-3. Employment in temporary help services has been 

expanding since 2003

Thousands Percent of total nonfarm payroll employment

NOTE: Shaded areas represent recessions. Data are seasonally adjusted.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005

Chart 3-3. Employment in temporary help services has been 

expanding since 2003

• Employment in temporary help services—an industry that provides workers to 

many other industries—grew rapidly during the 1990s, but began to decline in 

2000. Employment fell sharply in 2001, and was little changed (on net) in 

2002.

• Temporary help employment began increasing in 2003; about half a million 

jobs were added from April 2003 through December 2005.

• At the end of 2005, the industry accounted for nearly 2 percent of total 

nonfarm payroll employment, about the same share as at its peak in 2000.
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 10.6

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                    SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT AGREEMENT
                                       OF
                                 DAVID H. BROWN
                              DATED JANUARY 1, 1997



January 26, 2000

As outlined in the Puyallup Valley Bank Board of Directors minutes dated January
26, 2000, the sum of Fifteen Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($15,000.00) a year is
being set aside for a period of five (5) years in a supplemental retirement
benefit agreement for Roy W. Thompson, Senior Vice President-Credit
Administrator, beginning in the year 2000.

Therefore, David H. Brown's supplemental retirement benefit agreement of January
1, 1997, Paragraph 3.01 of the Deferred Compensation, shall be amended as
follows:

                   1997                    $35,000.00
                   1998                    $35,000.00
                   1999                    $35,000.00
                   2000                    $20,000.00
                   2001                    $20,000.00
                   2002                    $20,000.00
                   2003                    $20,000.00
                   2004                    $20,000.00
                   2005                    $35,000.00
                   2006                    $35,000.00

In the event that the employee, Roy W. Thompson, terminates earlier than the
five (5) years agreement, any balance remaining on the yearly commitment of
$15,000.00 will be re-credited to David H. Brown's agreement of January 1, 1997
as originally stated.

Approved by:


/S/ THOMAS R. ABSHER                             /S/ WARREN HUNT
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------
Thomas R. Absher                                 Warren Hunt


/S/ ROGER KNUTSON                                /S/ DAVID HAMRY
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------
Roger Knutson                                    David Hamry

/S/ DEXTER SILVER                                /S/ THOMAS PASQUIER
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------
Dexter Silver                                    Thomas Pasquier

/S/ A. EUGENE HAMMERMASTER
-------------------------------------
A. Eugene Hammermaster
# 20QRTL1_00
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

         CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-39928,
333-55520, 333-72194, 333-91070, and 333-91072) of our reports dated January 24,
2003, except for the subsequent event described in Note 17 as to which the date
is February 28, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
consolidated financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 2002,
which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 28, 2003
# Wiley B . McAfe e Distric t Attorne y Ma y 14 , 201 5 Mr . Jeffer y

D . Kyl e Cler k o f Cour t o f Appeal s P. O . Bo x

1245 7 Austin , T X7871 1 Re : Cas eNo . 03-15-00290-CR ; Rafae l Hernandez-Prad o v . Th eStat eo f

Texa s Appea l fro m Caus eNo . 9767 A i n th e33r d Distric t Cour t o f Burne t Count y Dea r Mr . Kyle : Pleas eaccep t

thi s lette r a s ou r designatio n o f

Lea d Counse l fo r

th eStat eo f Texas , Appellee , i n th eabov edescribe d case . Lea d Counse l fo r thi s cas eis : Gar y W . Bunyar d Assistan t

Distric t Attorne y P.O . Bo x

72 5 Llano , T X7864 3 (325 ) 247-575 5

(voice ) (325 ) 247-527 4

(fax ) g.bunyard@co.llano.tx.u s Texa s Stat eBa r

No . 0335350 0



# 81 1 Berr y Stree t • P.O . Bo x 72 5 • Uano . Texa s 7884 3 • 325-247.575 5 • Fa x 325-247-527 4 Sincerely,^

cc : Mr . Gar y

E . Prus t Attorne y

fo r Appellan t vi a eServ e ACCEPTED 03-15-00290-CR 5277323 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/14/2015 8:32:45 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK