alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
              -----------------------------------------------------

                   CHASE CREDIT CARD OWNER TRUST SERIES 2000-1

             ------------------------------------------------------



         The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, as Administrator pursuant to the Indenture for the Chase
Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2000-1 does hereby certify that:

                  1. The undersigned is an Authorized Officer pursuant to the
                  Indenture to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
                  Indenture Trustee.

                  2. This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.9 of
                  the Indenture.

                  3. A review of the activities of the Issuer for the calendar
                  year ended December 31, 2001, and of performance under this
                  Indenture has been made under the supervision of the
                  undersigned.

                  4. To the best of the undersigned knowledge, based on such
                  review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and
                  covenants in all material respects under this Indenture for
                  the calendar year ended December 31, 2001. No default in the
                  compliance of any such condition or covenant has occurred or
                  is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

                  5. The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Issuer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Indenture known to the undersigned to have been made
                  during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature
                  of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Issuer, if
                  any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
                  of each such default: NONE.


                                                  (signatures on following page)


<PAGE>





         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 25th day of March, 2002.

                                       By CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, National
                                       Association, as Administrator




                                       By:     /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
                                              -------------------------
                                       Name:  Patricia M. Garvey
                                       Title: Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-3000

JAMES MALLARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BRUCE BROWN, in his individual capacity;

WILLIAM KEEN, in his individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (CV-95-55-2-BO)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 28, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Mallard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mallard v. Brown,

No. CV-95-55-2-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          22,562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      303
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,893
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,902
<PP&E>                                          10,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,428
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,696
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   237
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,444)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,444)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.70)


</TABLE>
EX-10.39



 Exhibit 10.39 
 



 
 December 5, 2012 
 Peter A. Reynolds 
 1934 Port Locksleigh Place 

Newport Beach, CA 92660 
  

	 	Re:	Amendment of Executive Severance Agreement 

 Dear Pete: 
 This letter confirms the amendment, as set forth below, of your
Amended and Restated Executive Severance Agreement, dated 9/26/2008, with Apria Healthcare Group Inc. (the “Severance Agreement”). 
 In the event that you become entitled to severance pay pursuant to Section 4(a) of the Severance Agreement and the timing of your delivery of the release of claims (as contemplated by Sections
4(a)and 4(d) of the Severance Agreement) could cause the severance pay installments to commence in either of two calendar years, such installments shall commence in the second of those two years but shall otherwise be paid in accordance with the
Severance Agreement. 
 Except as expressly provided in the preceding paragraph, your Severance Agreement continues in effect in
accordance with its terms. This letter shall be construed and interpreted consistent with Section 11(a) of the Severance Agreement. 
  

			
	Apria Healthcare Group Inc.
	
	 /s/ Robert S. Holcombe

	By:	 	Robert S. Holcombe
	Title:	 	EVP, General Counsel & Secretary


  

	
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
	
	 /s/ Peter A Reynolds

	Peter A. Reynolds


  
 1
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-1614

_____________________________

TERRANCE LAMAR JACKSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

June 6, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

ROBERTS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Terrance Lamar Jackson, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Chart 3-7. Workers employed in service occupations were 

least likely to be displaced in 2001-2002

3.9

2.2

4.4

5.0

6.9

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Management,

professional, and

related occupations

Service

occupations

Sales and office

occupations

Natural resources,

construction, and

maintenance

occupations

Production,

transportation, and

material moving

occupations

2001-2002

Displacement rate

NOTE: Displaced workers are persons 20 years and older who lost or left jobs they had held for at least 3 years because their plant 

or company closed or moved, there was insufficient work for them to do, or their positions or shifts were abolished. The 2-year

displacement rates shown here are the most recent data available. 

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 3-7. Workers employed in service occupations were 

least likely to be displaced in 2001-2002

• The displacement rate reflects the likelihood of job loss due to plant or 

company closings, reduced work loads, or the abolishment of positions or 

shifts. 

• Workers in service occupations were least likely to be displaced in 2001-2002. 

In contrast, workers in production, transportation, and material moving 

occupations were the most likely to be displaced during the period.
1

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Bezalel GROSSBERGER,

Plaintiff,

v.

Patrick RUANE and Marion RUANE,

Defendants.

 

 

Civ. No. 11-3728

OPINION and ORDER

THOMPSON, U.S.D.J.

This matter has come before the Court on Plaintiff Bezalel Grossberger’s renewed 

Motion to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel [Docket # 10]. For the reasons that follow, the application 

is denied.

As stated in this Court’s initial Opinion and Order denying Plaintiff’s first application for 

pro bono counsel [8], neither the Supreme Court of the United States nor the Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit has found a constitutional right to counsel for litigants in a civil case. See 

Parham v. Johnson, 126 F.3d 454, 456 (3d Cir. 1997). A court, however, “may request an 

attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). District 

courts are vested with broad discretionary authority in this regard. See Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 

147, 153 (3d Cir. 1993). The Court proceeds carefully in appointing pro bono counsel because 

“volunteer lawyer time is a precious commodity [that] should not be wasted on frivolous cases.” 

Parham, 126 F.3d at 458. Therefore, “[b]efore the court is justified in exercising its discretion in 

favor of appointment, it must first appear that the claim has some merit in fact and law.”

Tabron, 6 F.3d at 155 (citation omitted). 

Case 3:11-cv-03728-AET -LHG Document 11 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 103
2

In its initial denial of Plaintiff’s request for pro bono counsel, the Court assumed for 

purposes of deciding that issue that Plaintiff’s claims had arguable merit. (Op. and Order of 

Nov. 2, 2011). The Court relied instead on a weighing of the Parnham factors, see Parham, 126 

F.3d at 457, in denying the application. (Op. and Order of Nov. 2, 2011). Since the denial of 

Plaintiff’s original application, Defendants subsequently moved before this Court to dismiss 

Plaintiff’s claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), [9], arguing that Plaintiff has released all claims 

against the Defendants and that Plaintiff’s claims are otherwise barred by the statute of 

limitations. As such, this Court is no longer willing to assume that Plaintiff has presented a 

claim that has merit in either law or fact. That issue will need to be addressed in deciding 

Defendants’ pending motion. Therefore, Plaintiff’s renewed application is denied, and Plaintiff 

should respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss in accordance with the normal briefing 

schedule. 

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS on this 5

th day of December, 2011

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel [6] is DENIED; and it 

is 

ORDERED that Plaintiff is to respond to the pending Motion to Dismiss [9] in 

accordance with the normal briefing schedule.

/s/ Anne E. Thompson

ANNE E. THOMPSON, U.S.D.J.

Case 3:11-cv-03728-AET -LHG Document 11 Filed 12/05/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 104
**Exhibit32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with Amendment No.1 to the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Matthew A. Flynn, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Matthew A. Flynn                                         |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Matthew  A. Flynn                                             |
| Senior  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| November  8, 2004                                             |

 

This certificationaccompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Chart 5-5. Women continue to be more likely than men to 

work part time

Percent

NOTE: Shaded areas represent recessions. Data are seasonally adjusted. Beginning in 1994, data reflect the introduction of a major 

redesign of the Current Population Survey that included changes affecting the measurement of part-time workers. 

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Men

Women

Chart 5-5. Women continue to be more likely than men to 

work part time

• Women are more than twice as likely as men to work part time—that is, fewer 

than 35 hours per week. In 2005, about 25 percent of employed women were 

part-time workers, compared with 11 percent of employed men. 

• The pronounced upward shift in part-time employment in January 1994 was 

due to definitional and measurement changes associated with the redesign of 

the Current Population Survey.
Exhibit 10.4






Exhibit 10.4


Summary of the principal terms of the lease agreements 
       between Finisar Sweden AB and Zarlink Semiconductor AB 
               (Original document in Swedish)


Beginning on May 1, 2012, Finisar Sweden AB entered into a lease agreement with landlord Zarlink Semiconductor AB regarding office space located at Bruttovägen 5, Box 685, 175 27 Järfälla, Sweden.  The initial term of the Lease Agreement is 10 years.  The Lease Agreement is non-cancelable for the first 8 years, until April 30, 2020.  After the first 8 years, the lease is cancelable with 12 months notice. The current total leased space is 1,200 square meters.  The current monthly rental payment is SEK 99,762, adjusted annually for the price inflation index.  There is no security deposit required under the terms of the lease.  The Lease Agreement does not have an option to extend.


The Lease Agreement also contains provisions covering condition and use of the premises, furnishings, fixtures, fittings, telephone and data lines, heating and hot water, unforeseen costs, value added tax,  interest, maintenance,  management and operation, inspection, access, building material specifications, planning and building code fines, reductions in rent, requirements imposed by relevant authorities, signage, locks, force majeure, security, insurance, coexistence, property tax and surrender of security of tenure.


Beginning on April 1, 2009, Finisar Sweden AB entered into a lease agreement with landlord Zarlink Semiconductor AB regarding office space located at Bruttovägen 7, Box 685, 175 27 Järfälla, Sweden.  The initial term of the Lease Agreement is 5 years.  The Lease Agreement is cancelable with 12 months notice. The current total leased space is 2,025 square meters.  The current monthly rental payment is SEK 529,420, adjusted annually for the price inflation index.  There is no security deposit required under the terms of the lease.  The Lease Agreement automatically extends for 3 years if not canceled 12 months before expiration of the initial term.


The Lease Agreement also contains provisions covering condition and use of the premises, furnishings, fixtures, fittings, telephone and data lines, heating and hot water, unforeseen costs, value added tax,  interest, maintenance,  management and operation, inspection, access, building material specifications, planning and building code fines, reductions in rent, requirements imposed by relevant authorities, signage, locks, force majeure, security, insurance, coexistence, property tax and surrender of security of tenure.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5401 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5401

  To amend section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to the 
                  marking of imported home furniture.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2004

  Mr. Ehlers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to the 
                  marking of imported home furniture.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARKING OF IMPORTED HOME FURNITURE.

    (a) In General.--Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1304) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (i), (j), (k), and (l) as 
        (j), (k), (l), and (m), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (h) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(i) Marking of Home Furniture.--No exception shall be made under 
subsection (a)(3) of this section with respect to home furniture, each 
piece of which shall have, in addition to the permanent marking 
required by subsection (a), a hang tag or paper label affixed in such a 
manner that a retail purchaser viewing the piece of unpackaged 
furniture can identify the country of origin on initial inspection 
without rotating, turning, or tilting the piece of home furniture. The 
hang tag or paper label shall be at least 70 square centimeters in 
size, shall be affixed in such a manner that it remains on the piece of 
home furniture until the piece reaches the ultimate retail consumer, 
and shall not be affixed to the back or underside of the piece of 
furniture.''; and
            (3) in subsection (k), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``subsection (i)'' and inserting ``subsection (j)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 31612-9-II.

Division Two.

November 8, 2005.]

#### Stephen Laughlin et al., *Respondents,*v. Allstate Insurance Company et al., *Petitioners.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 02-2-10380-0, Frederick W. Fleming, J., entered April 2, 2004. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J. Pro. Tern., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., and Houghton, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5242 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5242

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain interstate 
                  conduct relating to captive mammals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 2004

   Mr. Farr (for himself, Mr. Shays, Mr. Leach, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Van 
 Hollen, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. George Miller of California, Ms. Lee, Mr. 
Wexler, Mr. Greenwood, Ms. Solis, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Moran of 
    Virginia, Mr. Berman, Mr. Honda, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Nadler, Mrs. 
   Maloney, Mr. Evans, Mr. Ackerman, and Mr. Inslee) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain interstate 
                  conduct relating to captive mammals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Captive Mammal Protection Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPORT OR POSSESSION OF CAPTIVE MAMMALS FOR PURPOSES OF 
              KILLING OR INJURING THEM.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 49. Captive mammals
    ``(a) Prohibition.--Whoever, in or affecting interstate or foreign 
commerce, knowingly transfers, transports, or possesses a captive 
mammal, for the purposes of allowing the killing or injuring of that 
mammal for entertainment or for the collection of a trophy, shall be 
fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.
    ``(b) Definitions.--In this section--
            ``(1) the term `captive mammal' means a mammal that has 
        been held in captivity, whether or not the defendant knows the 
        length of the captivity, for the shorter of--
                    ``(A) the majority of the animal's life; or
                    ``(B) a period of 1 year; and
            ``(2) the term `captivity' does not include any period 
        during which an animal lives as it would in the wild--
                    ``(A) surviving primarily by foraging for naturally 
                occurring food;
                    ``(B) roaming at will over an open area of not less 
                than 1,000 acres; and
                    ``(C) having the opportunity to avoid hunters.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning 
of chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new item:

``49 Captive mammals.''.
                                 <all>
```