EXHIBIT 99.2
                                  ------------

     Safe Harbor Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------


      The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act") provides
a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to
provide prospective information about their companies, so long as those
statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful
cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those discussed in the statement. First
Federal Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") desires to take advantage of the "safe
harbor" provisions of the Act. Certain information, particularly information
regarding future economic performance and finances and plans and objectives of
management, contained or incorporated by reference in Bancorp's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, is forward-looking.
In some cases, information regarding certain important factors that could cause
actual results of operations or outcomes of other events to differ materially
from any such forward-looking statement appear together with such statement. In
addition, forward-looking statements are subject to other risks and
uncertainties affecting the financial institutions industry, including, but not
limited to, the following:

Interest Rate Risk

      Bancorp's operating results are dependent to a significant degree on its
net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from
loans, investments and other interest-earning assets and interest expense on
deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. The interest
income and interest expense of Bancorp change as the interest rates on
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities change. Interest rates
may change because of general economic conditions, the policies of various
regulatory authorities and other factors beyond Bancorp's control. In a rising
interest rate environment, loans tend to prepay slowly and new loans at higher
rates increase slowly, while interest paid on deposits increases rapidly
because the terms to maturity of deposits tend to be shorter than the terms to
maturity or prepayment of loans. Such differences in the adjustment of interest
rates on assets and liabilities may negatively affect Bancorp's income.

Possible Inadequacy of the Allowance for Loan Losses

      Bancorp maintains an allowance for loan losses based upon a number of
relevant factors, including, but not limited to, trends in the level of
nonperforming assets and classified loans, current and anticipated economic
conditions in the primary lending area, past loss experience, possible losses
arising from specific problem loans and changes in the composition of the loan
portfolio. While the Board of Directors of Bancorp believes that it uses the
best information available to determine the allowance for loan losses,
unforeseen market conditions could result in material adjustments, and net
earnings could be significantly adversely affected if circumstances differ
substantially from the assumptions used in making the final determination.

      Loans not secured by one- to four-family residential real estate are
generally considered to involve greater risk of loss than loans secured by one-
to four-family residential real estate due, in part, to the effects of general
economic conditions. The repayment of multifamily residential and
nonresidential real estate loans generally depends upon the cash flow from the
operation of the property, which may be negatively affected by national and
local economic conditions. Construction loans may also be negatively affected
by such economic conditions, particularly loans made to developers who do not
have a buyer for a property before the loan is made. The risk of default on
consumer loans increases during periods of recession, high unemployment and
other adverse economic conditions. When consumers have trouble paying their
bills, they are more likely to pay mortgage loans than consumer loans. In
addition, the collateral securing such loans, if any, may decrease in value
more rapidly than the outstanding balance of the loan.

Competition

      First Federal Savings Bank of Eastern Ohio ("First Federal") competes for
deposits with other savings associations, commercial banks and credit unions
and issuers of commercial paper and other securities, such as shares in money
market mutual funds. The primary factors in competing for deposits are interest
rates and convenience of office location. In making loans, First Federal
competes with other savings associations, commercial banks, consumer finance
companies, credit unions, leasing companies, mortgage companies and other
lenders. Competition is affected by, among other things, the general
availability of lendable funds, general and local economic conditions, current
interest rate levels and other factors that are not readily predictable. The
size of financial institutions competing with First Federal is likely to
increase as a result of changes in statutes and regulations eliminating various
restrictions on interstate and inter-industry branching and acquisitions. Such
increased competition may have an adverse effect upon Bancorp.

Legislation and Regulation that may Adversely Affect Bancorp's Earnings

      First Federal is subject to extensive regulation by the Office of Thrift
Supervision (the "OTS") and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
"FDIC") and is periodically examined by such regulatory agencies to test
compliance with various regulatory requirements. As a savings and loan holding
company, Bancorp is also subject to regulation and examination by the OTS. Such
supervision and regulation of First Federal and Bancorp are intended primarily
for the protection of depositors and not for the maximization of shareholder
value and may affect the ability of the company to engage in various business
activities. The assessments, filing fees and other costs associated with
reports, examinations and other regulatory matters are significant and may have
an adverse effect on Bancorp's net earnings.

      The FDIC is authorized to establish separate annual assessment rates for
deposit insurance of members of the Bank Insurance Fund (the "BIF") and the
Savings Association Insurance Fund (the "SAIF"). The FDIC has established a
risk-based assessment system for both SAIF and BIF members. Under such system,
assessments may vary depending on the risk the institution poses to its deposit
insurance fund. Such risk level is determined by reference to the institution's
capital level and the FDIC's level of supervisory concern about the
institution.

      Legislation enacted in 1996 provides for the merger of the SAIF and BIF
effective January 1, 1999, assuming there are no savings associations under
federal law. Under separate proposed legislation, Congress is considering the
elimination of the federal thrift charter and the separate federal regulation
of thrifts. As a result, First Federal would have to convert to a different
financial institution charter. In addition, First Federal would be regulated
under federal law as a bank and would, therefore, become subject to the more
restrictive activity limitations imposed on national banks. Moreover, Bancorp
might become subject to more restrictive holding company requirements,
including activity limits and capital requirements similar to those imposed on
First Federal. Bancorp cannot predict the impact of the conversion of First
Federal to, or regulation of Federal as, a bank until the legislation requiring
such change is enacted.