alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 635 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 635

To assure that enrollment in any Medicare prescription drug program is 
                               voluntary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 
  Ways and Means, and Education and the Workforce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To assure that enrollment in any Medicare prescription drug program is 
                               voluntary.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASSURING TOTALLY VOLUNTARY NATURE OF ENROLLMENT IN ANY 
              MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG PROGRAM.

    Enrollment in a prescription drug plan established under title 
XVIII of the Social Security Act shall be totally voluntary and no 
individual shall be required to enroll in such a plan as part of any 
contract with any employer or under any collective bargaining agreement 
or otherwise (including any revision made to any benefit or pension 
plan or agreement referred to in section 9701 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986, relating to coal industry health benefits).
                                 <all>
```
# table14full21

&8Page &P of &N
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of uWink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending January 2, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter F. Wilkniss,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.



April 2, 2007                                      By: /s/ Peter F. Wilkniss
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  Peter F. Wilkniss
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  Chief Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, Nos. 33-57612 and 33-32852) pertaining to the Dyersburg Corporation
1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 33-74350) pertaining to the Dyersburg Corporation Stock Option Plan for
Employees of Acquired Companies of our report dated May 19, 1997, except Note
12, as to which the date is July 15, 1997, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of AIH Inc. included in the Dyersburg Corporation Current
Report on Form 8-K dated September 2, 1997, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.


                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                   ---------------------
                                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Columbus, Georgia
September 8, 1997
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

 Submitted November 17, 2010*

 Decided November 19, 2010

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 10-2856

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MARCUS L. WELTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United 

States District Court for the 

Western District of 

Wisconsin.

No. 08-CR-39-BBC-01

Barbara B. Crabb, Judge.

Order

Our most recent decision in this criminal prosecution remanded to the district 

court for reconsideration in light of United States v. Corner, 598 F.3d 411 (7th Cir. 2010) 

(en banc).

On remand, the district judge reduced Welton’s sentence from 188 to 151 

months’ imprisonment, adjusting for the crack-powder ratio in the Sentencing 

 

* This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After 

examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R. 

App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with 

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

T

o

b

e

c

i

t

e

d

o

n

l

y

i

n

a

c

c

o

r

d

a

n

c

e

w

i

t

h

F

e

d

.

R

.

A

p

p

.

P

.

3

2

.

1

N

o
No. 10-2856 Page 2

Guidelines. Welton has taken another appeal. His lawyer has filed an Anders brief, 

observing that the district court carried out this court’s instructions and that the 

reduced sentence cannot plausibly be contested as unreasonably high. Welton was 

notified of counsel’s position but has not used his opportunity, see Circuit Rule 51, to 

respond.

Counsel’s evaluation of the appeal is accurate. The only issue is how (if at all) to 

adjust the sentence in light of the discretion recognized by Corner. The district judge 

used that discretion, and an attack on the 151-month term would be frivolous. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed as frivolous.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 141 (Friday, July 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 36732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel. Projects in MRSA.
    Date: August 14, 2009.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Brenda Lange-Gustafson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Scientific Review Program, Room 3122, 6700-
B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-3684, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96f4f1e3e5e2f7f0e5f9f8d6f8fff7fff2b8f8fffeb8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a181d0f090e1b1c0915143a14131b131e54141312541d150c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel. Mechanisms of Inflammation.
    Date: August 21, 2009.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Wendy F. Davidson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-402-8399. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aacecbdcc3ced9c5c4ddeac4c3cbc3ce84c4c3c284cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81e5e0f7e8e5f2eeeff6c1efe8e0e8e5afefe8e9afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 17, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-17586 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-47646, 333-55504, 333-74768 and 333-120091)of Microtune, Inc. of our reports dated March 10, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Microtune, Inc., Microtune Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Microtune, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

Dallas, Texas 

March 10, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          64,601
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,566
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,132
<PP&E>                                          75,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     286,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,595
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,501
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,468)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,228
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,843
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,843
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jane ToddJane ToddChief Financial Officer




|Date: | March 31, 2008
|----- | --------------

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 10, 2016

No. 04-16-00347-CV

ALLSTATE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

, Appellant

v.

Gregorio G. PAREDES Jr.,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9,016

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In this court’s order of August 11, 2016, appellate deadlines in this case were suspended until

September 26, 2016, and the parties were ordered to mediation with Paul Van Osselaer. On

October 4, 2016, parties filed a joint motion requesting that the deadline suspension be extended

until October 27, 2016.

The request is granted. Appellate deadlines in this case are hereby suspended until

October 27, 2016

.

It is so ORDERED on October 10, 2016.

__________________________________ _ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of October, 2016.

__________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 2 of 13 PageID: 2

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 3 of 13 PageID: 3

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 4 of 13 PageID: 4

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 5 of 13 PageID: 5

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 6 of 13 PageID: 6

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 7 of 13 PageID: 7

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 8 of 13 PageID: 8

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 9 of 13 PageID: 9

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 10 of 13 PageID: 10

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 11 of 13 PageID: 11

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 12 of 13 PageID: 12

Case 1:11-cv-01552-NLH -AMD   Document 1    Filed 03/18/11   Page 13 of 13 PageID: 13
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40153

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OMAR ALEJANDRO MILLAN-ARTEAGA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-1702-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Omar Alejandro 

Millan-Arteaga has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Millan-Arteaga has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40153 Document: 00513243229 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
No. 15-40153

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40153 Document: 00513243229 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
Economics Made Easy

What is a location quotient?

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) uses 

location quotients, or LQs, to see where

occupations orindustries are concentrated in 

the United States. LQs compare local 

employmentin an occupation or industry to

national employment in that occupation or 

industry. An LQ higher than one means an 

occupation or industry is more concentrated 

in that area than in the nation. An LQ less than 

one means an occupation or industry is less 

concentrated in that area than in the nation.

Glossary

Occupation— the type of 

job a person has. 

Example: retail salesperson

Industry — the type of 

business establishment 

where a person works. 

Example:shoe store

Employment — the 

number of workers or jobs.

Calculate a location quotient!

What if there are 77,000 lawyers out of 9.5 million (9,500,000)total jobsin 

New York and there are 660,000 lawyers out of 150 million (150,000,000) 

total jobsin the United States?

 LQ for lawyers in New York = 

77,000÷9,500,000

660,000÷150,000,000

= 

0.0081

0.0044

= 1.84

The LQ is more than one, so there is a higher concentration of lawyers in New 

York, compared with the concentration of lawyersin the United States.

In the news

Have you ever seen a news article 

that talks about unique or wacky 

occupations by states? They 

probably use LQsto find jobsthat 

are highly concentrated in certain 

areas.

DIY data

Want to try calculating LQs on your 

own? You can visit 

www.bls.gov/oes/ and find national 

and area employment to calculate 

location quotients.
All Mississippi counties are eligible for

disaster assistance as of September 6.

NOTE:

Unemployment rates by county and disaster assistance eligibility,

Mississippi, October 2005, not seasonally adjusted

7.0% or more

6.0% to 6.9%

5.0% to 5.9%

4.0% to 4.9%

3.9% or below

Unemployment Rate

Pearl

River

15.3%

Hancock

23.9%

Harrison

23.2%

Jackson

16.7%

George

Stone 9.0%

11.3%

Forrest

6.6%

Greene

Lamar 8.0%

6.4% Perry

7.3%

Jones

Jefferson 5.4%

Davis

9.6%

Wayne

6.2%

Covington

6.3% Lawrence

8.1%

Wilkinson

18.0%

Pike

10.7%

Marion

Amite 9.0%

11.4% Walthall

11.3%

Franklin

9.0%

Lincoln

7.4%

Adams

11.8%

Jefferson

14.8%

Copiah

9.1%

Claiborne

10.8% Simpson

6.6%

Smith

5.7%

Madison

5.3%

Rankin

4.2%

Warren

6.9%

Hinds

7.2%

Attala

6.8%

Webster

7.2%

Choctaw

6.4%

Chickasaw

8.7%

Lee

5.7%

Itawamba

5.7%

Lowndes

7.2%

Monroe

7.9%

Clay

11.2%

Oktibbeha

6.1%

Winston

7.0%

Noxubee

10.4%

Kemper

8.0% Neshoba

5.2%

Leake

5.8%

Jasper

7.2%

Clarke

7.5%

Lauderdale

6.3%

Newton

5.5%

Scott

5.2%

(State rate = 8.7%; U.S. rate = 4.6%)

Marshall

6.8%

DeSoto

4.0%

Tate

6.4%

Coahoma

8.6%

Benton

8.6% Tippah

5.6%

Panola

7.8%

Quitman

6.9%

Bolivar

7.8%

Tunica

9.4%

Yalobusha

7.0%

Lafayette

4.3%

Tallahatchie

6.6%

Pontotoc

5.7%

Calhoun

5.7%

Union

5.6%

Prentiss

6.3%

Tishomingo

6.7%

Alcorn

6.1%

Carroll

6.1%

Sunflower

8.2%

Leflore

8.0%

Grenada

6.6%

Montgomery

7.2%

Humphreys

6.1%

Washington

9.0% Holmes

9.8%

Yazoo

7.5% Issaquena

7.9%

Sharkey

6.0%
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sinoenergy Corporation (the
“Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bo Huang, the
Chief Executive Officer, and I, Shiao Ming Sheng, the Chief Financial Officer,
of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief that:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








December
      24, 2008/s/
      Bo HuangBo
      HuangChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Shiao Ming
ShengShiao
      Ming ShengChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 21.  Securities of Registrant


<PAGE>  99

                                                    Year          Percentage
                               Jurisdiction       Acquired         of Voting   
Name of Subsidiary           of Incorporation     or Formed    Securities Owned
------------------           ----------------     ---------    ----------------
ASI Data Services Inc.            Maine             1993             100%
                                                                     
Northeast Savings Bank,           Maine             1987             100%
F.S.B. (and its 100% owned   
subsidiary, Northeast          
Financial Service Corp. and       
100% owned second tier       
subsidiary, First New England
Benefits, Inc.)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### REVISED JANUARY 28, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10238 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BRUCE J. DELLERE, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CR-307-1 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent BruceJ. Dellere has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dellere has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 20, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce ClerkNo. 10-10238

2 GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
# 2014

&8page &P of &N	

# 2015

# 2016

# 2017
# 21QRTL5_00