alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
UNAUDITED INFORMATION FOR 1ST QUARTER 10-Q. THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATION AS OF, AND FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED,
MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     6,229
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                       555
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,361
<PP&E>                                          15,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,832
<BONDS>                                          1,633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          7
<COMMON>                                           225
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,830
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,317
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    681
<INCOME-TAX>                                       236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                445
<DISCONTINUED>                                     300
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       145
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby provides notice of the membership of its Performance Review Board (PRB) for the Commission's Senior Executive Service (SES) members. The function of this board is to make recommendations relating to the performance of senior executives in the Commission. This action is undertaken in accordance with Title 5, U.S.C., section 4314(c)(4). The Commission's PRB will add the following members:

Norman C. Bay,

Michael C. McLaughlin,

Jamie L. Simler,

Jeff C. Wright.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-17344 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Infinite Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Smith, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




August
      12, 2009
                /s/
      Michael S. SmithMichael
      S. SmithChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alexander J. Kuras, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[852 NYS2d 907]

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 155.35) and, in appeal No. 2, he appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation imposed in connection with another judgment of conviction and imposing a sentence of incarceration. Addressing first the contention of defendant with respect to appeal No. 2, we conclude that the People, by presenting the testimony of defendant’s probation officer that she observed defendant plead guilty to a charge of criminal mischief while on probation, presented “the requisite ‘residuum of competent legal evidence’ ” *(People v Michael J.F.,*15 AD3d 952, 953 [2005]). Defendant presented no evidence, and we conclude that the People met *1197their burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that he violated the terms and conditions of his probation *(see People v Pomales,*37 AD3d 1098 [2007], *lv denied*8 NY3d 949 [2007] ).

With respect to appeal No. 1, defendant failed to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered *(see People v Peterson,*35 AD3d 1195 [2006], lv *denied*8 NY3d 926 [2007]). Even assuming, arguendo, that this is one of those rare cases in which preservation of defendant’s contention is not required *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]), we conclude that County Court conducted a sufficient inquiry to ensure that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered *(see id.; People v Greer,*277 AD2d 1051 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 829 [2001]). Finally, to the extent that defendant challenges the resentences after it was determined he was ineligible for shock incarceration, that challenge is not properly before us because defendant did not take an appeal from the resentences. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Smith, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Inssa Mane, Appellant.

[853 NYS2d 410]

*965Kavanagh, J.

Early in the morning of April 4, 2004, defendant, without permission, entered four different apartments occupied by female college students, some of whom awoke to find him in their bedrooms. In one instance, defendant attempted to force one of the students to perform a sexual act. Defendant was subsequently convicted after a jury trial of eight of the nine counts in the indictment, and that judgment of conviction was affirmed on appeal (36 AD3d 1079 [2007], *lv denied 8*NY3d 987 [2007]). While the direct appeal of defendant’s judgment of conviction was pending before this Court, defendant moved pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment in County Court claiming that he did not properly execute a waiver of immunity when he testified before the grand jury and, as a result, he received transactional immunity from prosecution for any crimes that were the subject of that presentation. County Court denied that motion and defendant appeals, by permission, from that order.

Defendant’s claim that he did not give a knowing and intelligent waiver of immunity because of his inability to understand the English language could have been raised in his direct appeal and, moreover, his failure to move to dismiss the indictment prior to trial or to set aside the verdict prior to sentencing precludes a review of this issue by this Court *(see People v Haggins,*148 AD2d 987 [1989], *lv denied*74 NY2d 664 [1989]; *People v Hodge,*141 AD2d 843 [1988], *lv denied*72 NY2d 1046 [1988]).

Nor is reversal in the interest of justice warranted here because defendant knowingly and intelligently waived immunity prior to giving testimony before the grand jury. Not only were his counsel and an interpreter present when the waiver of immunity was first explained to defendant, but defendant, with the aid of the interpreter, acknowledged—in the presence of counsel as well as the foreperson of the grand jury—that he had reviewed the waiver with his counsel, understood its contents *966and knew that he would not be allowed to testify before the grand jury without giving up his rights as delineated in the waiver document, which he signed *(see People v Chasey,*5 AD3d 815, 816 [2004], *lv denied*2 NY3d 797 [2004]; *People v Collins,*288 AD2d 756, 757 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 752 [2002]).

Moreover, the record reveals that defendant was afforded the effective assistance of counsel and obtained meaningful representation throughout this proceeding *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 714-715 [1998]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed.
Table 28. Percent distribution of employed persons by age, sex, and contingent and 

noncontingent status, February 2005

Total, 16 years and over......... 138,952 1.8 2.3 4.1 95.9

 16 to 19 years................... 5,510 5.6 6.1 8.6 91.4

 20 to 24 years................... 13,114 4.6 5.2 8.2 91.8

 25 to 34 years..................... 30,103 2.3 2.9 4.8 95.2

 35 to 44 years..................... 34,481 1.2 1.7 3.0 97.0

 45 to 54 years................... 32,947 .8 1.2 2.7 97.3

 55 to 64 years..................... 17,980 .8 1.1 3.0 97.0

 65 years and over............... 4,817 1.6 2.3 5.2 94.8

Women, 16 years and over... 65,006 1.8 2.4 4.3 95.7

 16 to 19 years..................... 2,931 5.6 6.2 8.4 91.6

 20 to 24 years..................... 6,186 4.0 4.8 7.8 92.2

 25 to 34 years..................... 13,480 2.2 2.7 4.6 95.4

 35 to 44 years..................... 15,958 1.1 1.7 3.2 96.8

 45 to 54 years................... 15,754 1.1 1.6 3.2 96.8

 55 to 64 years................... 8,495 .9 1.1 3.2 96.8

 65 years and over.............. 2,202 2.6 3.5 7.2 92.8

Men, 16 years and over......... 73,946 1.8 2.2 3.9 96.1

 16 to 19 years..................... 2,579 5.6 6.1 8.9 91.2

 20 to 24 years..................... 6,928 5.2 5.7 8.6 91.4

 25 to 34 years..................... 16,624 2.4 3.1 5.0 95.0

 35 to 44 years..................... 18,523 1.3 1.6 2.9 97.1

 45 to 54 years..................... 17,193 .6 .8 2.1 97.9

 55 to 64 years..................... 9,485 .7 1.1 2.8 97.2

 65 years and over............... 2,615 .7 1.3 3.5 96.5

Estimate 1 Estimate 2 Estimate 3

Age and sex

Total 

employed 

(in 

thousands)

Contingent workers1

Noncontingent 

workers1

1 Contingent workers are those who do not have

an implicit or explicit contract for ongoing

employment. Persons who do not expect to continue

in their jobs for personal reasons, such as retirement

or returning to school, are not considered contingent

workers, provided that they would have the option of

continuing in the job were it not for these personal

reasons. Estimate 1 includes wage and salary

workers who expect their jobs will last for an

additional year or less and who had worked at their

jobs for 1 year or less. Estimate 2 includes wage

and salary workers, the self-employed, and

independent contractors who expect their

employment to last for an additional year or less and

who had worked at their jobs (or been selfemployed) for 1 year or less. Estimate 3 includes

all workers who do not expect their jobs to last.

This is the broadest definition of contingency and

estimates 1 and 2 of contingency are included in

estimate 3. Noncontingent workers are those

workers who do not fall into any of the three

definitions of contingency.

 

SOURCE: Contingent and alternative work

arrangements supplement to the Current

Population Survey, last conducted in February

2005, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of

Labor Statistics. 

83
**Exhibit 32**

**** 

**** 

**** 

**** 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT**

**** 

**** 

**** 

**           **Dann H. Bowman and Sandra F. Pender hereby certify as follows:

 

                1.     They are the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Chino Commercial Bancorp.

 

                2.    The Form 10-Q of Chino Commercial Bancorp for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 complies with the requirements pf Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78(m) or 78(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Chino Commercial Bancorp.

 

Date: May 13, 2011

 

                        By: /s/ Dann H. Bowman                                                  

                                       Dann H. Bowman

       President and Chief Executive Officer       

 

 

By: /s/ Sandra F. Pender                                                  

      Sandra F. Pender

                                      Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

----
Filed Pursuant to Rule 497 (e)
                  Registration File No.:  333-33037
                                  
                                  
                                  
                                  
                                  
                        PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
                         Dated March 4, 1998

     This Prospectus Supplement dated March 4, 1998 modifies the
Prospectus for the PaineWebber Pathfinders Trust, Treasury and
Growth Stock Series 22 dated January 29, 1998 (referred to herein as
the "TAGS 22 Prospectus").
                 ___________________________________

     Effective immediately, the discount in sales charge applicable
to employees of PaineWebber and its affiliates
and certain of their relatives as disclosed on page 14 of the TAGS
22 Prospectus will be $1.00 per 1,000 Units.
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Subjex Corporation does hereby certifythat:





(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/Aof Subjex
Corporation for the yearendedDecember 31, 2007(the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects,the financial
conditionand results of operations of
Subjex Corporation




Date:
      September 12, 2008
            By:
            /s/  Andrew
      D. HyderAndrew D. HyderPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer, Chief
              Financial
      Officer, Director and Principal
              Accounting
      Officer
Jane Carten
 
 Saturna Investment Trust
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/Jane Carten                           President
 
 
 
 March
19, 2024
 
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 Christopher Fankhauser
 
 Saturna Investment Trust
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/Christopher Fankhauser      Treasurer
 
 
 
 March
19, 2024
## ELECTRONIC RECORD COA# 03-13-00760-CR OFFENSE: 36.06 James Arthur Brown v. The State 

## STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Travis 

# 721-ff

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 331st District Court 

### DATE:05/12/15 Publish: NO TCCASE#: D-l-DC-13-300630



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS James Arthur Brown v. The State of STYLE: Texas 

# CCA#: IjW^/fl PRO S£ Petition CCA Disposition: FORDISCRETIONARYREVIEW IN CCAIS: DATE: 

# ^gFLK&l) JUDGE: 

# DATE: O^lu/zfltr SIGNED: PC: 

# JUDGE: n,QA CjaAsS~- PUBLISH: DNP: MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### ELECTRONIC RECORD
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 25, 2014

Order 

July 25, 2014

149411(50)

MELISSA RENEE POAG-EMERY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

MATTHEW JOHN EMERY,

Defendant-Appellee.

SC: 149411

COA: 318401

Kent CC: 08-001251-DM

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to substitute the corrected amicus curiae 

brief is GRANTED.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

137910

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137910 COA: 274752 Wayne CC: 06-005298-01 BRUCE CARL TONEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, based on my knowledge, the information contained in this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

| |  |       |  | /s/ROBERT L. HOWARD-ANDERSONRobert L. Howard-Anderson President and Chief
Executive Officer
| |  | ----- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Date: |  | October 16, 2007                                                                           

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Occam Networks, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
# Private dairy farms, 2007-10

Fatal occupational injuries in the private dairy farms industry, 2007-10 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries in the private dairy farms industry, 2007-10		

Fatal occupational injuries in the private dairy farms industry, 2007-10 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries in the private dairy farms industry, 2007-10		

Page &P
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert C. Howell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Organetix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 15, 2005

/s/ Robert C. Howell
--------------------
Name: Robert C. Howell
Title: Chief Financial Officer