alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of DutchFork Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, J. Thomas
Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                                           /s/ J. Thomas Johnson
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           J. Thomas Johnson
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:  June 2, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DutchFork Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by DutchFork
Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


<PAGE>



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of DutchFork Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Steve P.
Sligh, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



                               /s/ Steve P. Sligh
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Steve P. Sligh
                               Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                               and Treasurer


Date:   June 2, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to DutchFork Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by DutchFork
Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 555 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 555

       To suspend temporarily the duty on tantalum capacitor ink.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2003

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on tantalum capacitor ink.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TANTALUM CAPACITOR INK.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.34.10    Tantalum          Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     capacitor ink:                                                          31/2005          ''
                     Graphite Ink                                                                              .
                     P7300 of 85%
                     butyl acetate,
                     8% graphite,
                     and the
                     remaining
                     balance of non-
                     hazardous
                     resins; and
                     Graphite Paste
                     P5900 of 92-96%
                     water, 1-3%
                     graphite (CAS
                     No. 7782-42-5),
                     0.5-2% ammonia
                     (CAS No. 7664-
                     41-7), and <1%
                     acrylic resin
                     (CAS No. 9003-
                     32-1) (provided
                     for in
                     subheading
                     3207.30.00)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Russell M. Medford and Mark P.
Colonnese, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents,
with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AtheroGenics,
Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents
and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming
all that said attorney-in-facts and agents or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or casue to be done by virtue hereof.

         This power of attorney may be executed in multiple counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original or a facsimile or photocopy of an
original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same power of
attorney.

         This 28th day of March, 2003.

                                             /s/ MICHAEL A. HENOS
                                             -------------------------
                                             Michael A. Henos


                                             /s/ R. WAYNE ALEXANDER
                                             -------------------------
                                             R. Wayne Alexander


                                             /s/ DAVID BEARMAN
                                             -------------------------
                                             David Bearman


                                             /s/ VAUGHN D. BRYSON
                                             -------------------------
                                             Vaughn D. Bryson


                                             /s/ T. FORCHT DAGI
                                             -------------------------
                                             T. Forcht Dagi


                                             /s/ ARTHUR M. PAPPAS
                                             -------------------------
                                             Arthur M. Pappas

                                             /s/ WILLIAM A. SCOTT
                                             -------------------------
                                             William A. Scott


                                             /s/ STEPHEN G. SUDOVAR
                                             -------------------------
                                             Stephen G. Sudovar
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47646) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Plan, 2000Director Option Plan, 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2000 Stock Plan and options to purchase Series E Preferred Stock; the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-55504) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Plan, and the Registration Statement (FormS-8 No. 333-74768) pertaining to the Transilica Inc. 2001 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (as assumed by the registrant) and Domain Knowledge, Inc. 2000 Stock Option, Deferred Stock and Restricted Stock Plan (as assumed by the registrant)with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Microtune, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

Dallas, Texas 

March 9, 2004
# 18QRTL2_00

# image1.png
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MANA DIARRA,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 70889

Agency No. A208

- 926

- 798

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2 , 2020 * *

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Mana Diarra , a native and citizen of Mali , petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals ’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s

(“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings

. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due process

violations in immigration proceedings. Ji ang v. Holder , 754 F.3d 733, 738 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 8 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 70889

Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for review.

Diarra does not challenge the determination that his motion to reopen was

untimely and that he did not establish an exception to the filing deadline. See

Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) ( issues not

specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

Diarra’s contentions that the IJ violated due process, constituting an

exceptional situation that warrant ed sua sponte reopening

, fail because Diarra was

advised of his right to counse l, provided with a list of legal services , given ample

time to seek counsel

, assisted by the IJ in revie wing evidence in court

, and the

record reflects that Diarra understood the interpreter

. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d

1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to prevail on a due process claim) ; see

also Bonil la v. Lynch , 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[T]his court has

jurisdiction to review Board decisions denying sua sponte reopening only for the

limited purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or

constitutional error.”)

.

As stated in the court’s June 6, 2019, order, th e temporary stay of removal

remains in place until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**Exhibit 31.1**
 **Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**
 (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a))
 
 I, Brett Moyer, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Focus Enhancements, Inc.; 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  
 Date: November 15, 2004/s/ Brett MoyerBrett MoyerPresident and CEO  34
 ****
HOUSEHOLD DATA

ANNUAL AVERAGES

28. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, race, and Hispanic origin

(Numbers in thousands)

Reason for unemployment

Total White Black Hispanic origin

2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED

 Total unemployed ...................................................................... 6,801 8,378 4,969 6,137 1,416 1,693 1,138 1,353

Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs .............. 3,476 4,607 2,620 3,491 657 840 585 736

 On temporary layoff .................................................................... 1,067 1,124 875 921 144 148 190 216

 Not on temporary layoff .............................................................. 2,409 3,483 1,745 2,570 513 691 395 520

 Permanent job losers ................................................................ 1,764 2,701 1,294 2,029 355 488 255 350

 Persons who completed temporary jobs .................................. 645 783 451 541 158 203 140 171

Job leavers ................................................................................... 835 866 637 684 151 135 116 117

Reentrants .................................................................................... 2,031 2,368 1,408 1,619 492 576 325 384

New entrants ................................................................................ 459 536 304 342 115 142 112 117

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ............. 51.1 55.0 52.7 56.9 46.4 49.6 51.4 54.4

 On temporary layoff ................................................................... 15.7 13.4 17.6 15.0 10.1 8.8 16.7 15.9

 Not on temporary layoff ............................................................. 35.4 41.6 35.1 41.9 36.3 40.8 34.7 38.4

 Job leavers .................................................................................. 12.3 10.3 12.8 11.2 10.7 8.0 10.2 8.6

 Reentrants ................................................................................... 29.9 28.3 28.3 26.4 34.8 34.0 28.6 28.4

 New entrants ............................................................................... 6.8 6.4 6.1 5.6 8.1 8.4 9.9 8.6

UNEMPLOYED AS A PERCENT OF THE

 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE

 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs ............. 2.4 3.2 2.2 2.9 4.0 5.1 3.4 4.1

 Job leavers .................................................................................. .6 .6 .5 .6 .9 .8 .7 .7

 Reentrants ................................................................................... 1.4 1.7 1.2 1.3 3.0 3.5 1.9 2.1

 New entrants ............................................................................... .3 .4 .3 .3 .7 .9 .6 .7

 NOTE: Detail for the above race and Hispanic-origin groups will not sum to

totals because data for the other races group are not presented and Hispanics

are included in both the white and black population groups.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3668

___________ David Andy Bridwell, * * Petitioner - Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent - Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 11, 1999 Filed: May 18, 1999

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BEAM and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. David Andy Bridwell pled guilty to the use of firearms during and in relation to a drug offense in violation of 18 U.S.C.§ 924(c) and to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Bridwell later petitioned under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to have his 924(c) conviction vacated and set aside based on Bailey v. United States , 516 U.S. 137 (1995). The district court denied relief because of the current circuit law. See Bousley v. Brooks , 97 F.3d 284 (8th Cir. 1996). Bridwell appealed, and the Supreme Court subsequently reversed Bousley
. See Bousley v. United States , 523 U.S. 614, 118 S. Ct. 1604 (1998). Bridwell’s case subsequently returned to the district court which vacated Bridwell’s firearm conviction-2-

suasponte. The government moved for reconsideration, and the district court denied it without a hearing. Under Bousley the government was entitled to have the opportunity to present further evidence. See 118 S. Ct. at 1612 (“on remand, the Government should be permittedto present any admissible evidence of petitioner's guilt even if that evidence was not presented during petitioner's plea colloquy and would not normally have been offered before our decision in Bailey ”). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 853

To establish the position of Northern Border Coordinator in the Department 

of Homeland Security. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Ms. SLAUGHTER (for herself, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. WALSH, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. 

HOUGHTON, Mrs. MALONEY, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

RODRIGUEZ, and Mr. BISHOP of New York) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Select Committee on Homeland Security, and 

in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Transportation and Infrastructure, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To establish the position of Northern Border Coordinator 

in the Department of Homeland Security.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NORTHERN BORDER COORDINATOR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title IV of the Homeland Secu5 rity Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–296) is amended—
2

•HR 853 IH 

1 (1) in section 402, by redesignating paragraph 

2 (8) as paragraph (9) and by inserting after para3 graph (7) the following: 

4 ‘‘(8) Increasing the security of the border be5 tween the United States and Canada and the ports 

6 of entry located along that border, and improving 

7 the coordination among the agencies responsible for 

8 maintaining that security.’’; and 

9 (2) in subtitle C, by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘SEC. 431. NORTHERN BORDER COORDINATOR. 

12 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There shall be within the Direc13 torate of Border and Transportation Security the position 

14 of Northern Border Coordinator, who shall be appointed 

15 by the Secretary and who shall report directly to the 

16 Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security. 

17 ‘‘(b) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Northern Border Co18 ordinator shall be responsible for—

19 ‘‘(1) increasing the security of the border, in20 cluding ports of entry, between the United States 

21 and Canada; 

22 ‘‘(2) improving the coordination among the 

23 agencies responsible for the security described under 

24 paragraph (1); 
3

•HR 853 IH 

1 ‘‘(3) serving as the primary liaison with State 

2 and local governments and law enforcement agencies 

3 regarding security along the border between the 

4 United States and Canada; and 

5 ‘‘(4) serving as a liaison with the Canadian gov6 ernment on border security.’’. 

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 1(b) of such 

8 Act is amended in the table of contents by inserting after 

9 the item relating to section 430 the following:

‘‘Sec. 431. Northern Border Coordinator.’’.

Æ
# cfoi_rates_2021