alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0544]

# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Record Retention Requirements for the Soy Protein and Coronary Heart Disease Health Claim” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of January 14, 2009 (74 FR 2079), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0428. The approval expires on May 31, 2012. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: July 10, 2009.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E9-17094 Filed 7-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. of Section 1350,
as Created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned officer of Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



|(i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 6, 2007



By:

/s/ Paul M. BisaroPaul M. Bisaro.President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00213

- CR

IN RE THOMAS BENSON TAYLOR

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

JOHN E. NEILL

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed July 24, 2019

[OT06]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50053

DONALD BENALLY, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus J.E. SLADE, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna; O. IVAN WHITE, Regional Director - United States Bureau of Prisons,
Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-97-CV-418-H

- - - - - - - - - - August 19, 1998 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Donald Benally, federal prisoner # 26826-008, argues that the district court erred in denying his § 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition alleging that the respondents have refused to recalculate his sentence under the pre-Sentencing Guidelines law. We have reviewed Benally’s petition and have determined that Benally is challenging the validity of the district court’sNo. 98-50053 -2- imposition of his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines rather than the manner in which his sentence is being executed. Therefore, Benally’s “petition” should have been construed as a motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Cox v. Warden, Fed. Detention Ctr. , 911 F.2d 1111, 1113-15 (5th Cir. 1990). Because a § 2255 motion requires a certificate of appealability (COA) to be eligible for appellate review, the court would generally remand the case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether a COA should issue. See United States v. Youngblood , 116 F.3d 1113, 1114-15 (5th Cir. 1997). However, a § 2255 motion must be presented to the sentencing court for determination. See § 2255. Benally was sentenced by the district court in Phoenix, Arizona, which is located in the Ninth Circuit. Because neither the Texas district court nor this court has jurisdiction to address Benally’s motion, Benally’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Benally’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED as moot. APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### Eliette Lamarre, Appellant, v Roby Troop et al., Respondents.

[610 NYS2d 838]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.), dated May 22, 1992, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the defendants’ motion is denied.

Based upon the affirmation of Dr. Leo Parnés, the plaintiff has raised a triable issue of fact with regard to her claim that she sustained "serious injury” *(see, Harrel v Miles,*198 AD2d 400; *Serio v Radin,*168 AD2d 612). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles J. Stubbs, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ CHARLES J. STUBBS                
|Charles J. Stubbs                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer

August 8, 2008

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of POINTSTAR  ENTERTAINMENT  CORP. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  October 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Rafeh Hulays,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ Rafeh Hulays
                                        -------------------------------
Date: November 29, 2006                 Rafeh Hulays
                                        Chief Financial Officer
# Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment (Monthly)

"The Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment (METRO) release presents Current Employment Statistics data of employment for states and metropolitan areas. The release also contains Local Area Employment Statistics estimates of unemployment rates and of the civilian labor force for states and metropolitan areas. This report is issued monthly. To learn more, see www.bls.gov/lau/ and www.bls.gov/sae/. "

- March jobless rates up over the year in 269 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 51
- February jobless rates up over the year in 247 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 42
- January jobless rates up over the year in 218 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 59
- December jobless rates up over the year in 230 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 61
- November jobless rates up over the year in 214 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 58
- October jobless rates up over the year in 223 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 52
- September jobless rates up over the year in 231 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 64
- August jobless rates up over the year in 189 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 66
- July jobless rates down over the year in 192 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 79
- June jobless rates down over the year in 222 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 105
- May jobless rates down over the year in 177 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 84
- April jobless rates down over the year in 252 of 389 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 76
<page>




                                  Exhibit 32.2



                           Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of DirectView, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michele Ralston,
acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:


         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/Michele Ralston
Michele Ralston
Acting Chief Financial Officer
August    21, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-4250

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

ANTHONY MURPHY, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge (3:05-cr-00275-REP-1)

Submitted: February 4, 2009 Decided: February 18, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Frances H. 

Pratt, Carolyn V. Grady, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, 

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United 

States Attorney, Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Anthony Murphy appeals the twenty-four month sentence 

imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. On 

appeal, counsel asserts that the sentence is plainly 

unreasonable because the district court failed to consider the 

advisory sentencing guidelines range or the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

(2006) sentencing factors. Finding no reversible error, we 

affirm. 

 Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the 

district court sufficiently considered the advisory sentencing 

guideline range of eight to fourteen months and the statutory 

sentencing factors in imposing a sentence within the statutory 

maximum set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). We therefore find 

that the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release 

is not plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Crudup, 461 

F.3d 433, 439-40 (4th Cir. 2006) (providing standard). 

 Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### The City of Chester.

*(District Court, S. D. New York.*

April 5, 1886.)

Collision—Damages—Repairs in Excess—Survey.

When repairs of a general character, beyond the injuries inflicted by a collision, are made at the same time, and without separation of the items of the work as the repairs progress, the bills of repairs presented are no criterion of the damages, and the items of repairs claimed will be closely scrutinized to prevent exaggeration. The estimate of competent surveyors made immediately after the injury may be used in evidence. The commissioner in this case having, upon a'careful investigation, allowed much less than the estimate of the surveyors, the report was confirmed; though the repairs, asmado, adopted different'methods from those recommended by the surveyors, by allowing the expense of strengthening pieces, and disallowing the' surveyors’ estimate of permanent depreciation.

In Admiralty.

*E. D. McCarthy,*for libelant.

*Wilcox, Adams & Macklin,*for claimants.

Brown, J.

Notwithstanding the skillful and ingenious argument of counsel in behalf of tho exceptions in the above case, I am satisfied, upon a careful consideration of the testimony, that no injustice is done to the claimants by the commissioner’s report. The court, so far as in its power, will take equal care to prevent the exaggeration of claims, and to afford full reparation for the actual injury. Where repairing is delayed, and the repairs finally made are more extensive than the injury calls for, the closest scrutiny in separating the charges made is obligatory. Tho repairs are not in any case the necessary and sole criterion of tho damages. The actual damage properly proved may be recovered though the boat never be repaired; or the repairs may be partial only, and recovery may be had for the partial repair, with an allowance for permanent depreciation. One of the chief objections in this case is to the expense attendant on putting in strengthening timbers. This mode of repair was adopted instead of that recommended upon the survey made shortly after the accident. But tho survey, which was made by competent experts, while providing for certain repairs, gave a further estimated allowance of $2,000 for permanent damage. This last sum alone is much in excess of all the damage allowed by the commissioner. He has allowed the expense of the strengthening pieces in the place of certain other recommendations in the survey, but disallows all claims of permanent de*400predation, thus finding a sum far less than the amount of the survey. In the details of the expenses he has also cut off $200 from the labor account, by reason of its apparent large excess above the usual average relation to the material used. The nature of the repairs done, however, would, in this case, involve a larger proportion of labor than usual. Upon a careful review of the whole subject, I do not think the claimants have any just cause of complaint, and the report is therefore confirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 707 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 707

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit direct 
payment under the Medicare Program for clinical social worker services 
          provided to residents of skilled nursing facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

  Mr. Stark (for himself, Mr. Leach, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. 
Serrano, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Markey, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. 
    Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Towns, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Nadler, Mrs. 
  Christensen, Ms. Woolsey, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Frost, Mr. McDermott, 
 Mrs. Davis of California, Ms. Lee, and Mr. Rodriguez) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 
 and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit direct 
payment under the Medicare Program for clinical social worker services 
          provided to residents of skilled nursing facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clinical Social Work Medicare Equity 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING DIRECT PAYMENT UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM FOR 
              CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS OF 
              SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1888(e)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395yy(e)(2)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting ``clinical 
social worker services,'' after ``qualified psychologist services,''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1861(hh)(2) of such Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(hh)(2)) is amended by striking ``and other than services 
furnished to an inpatient of a skilled nursing facility which the 
facility is required to provide as a requirement for participation''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after the date that 
regulations relating to payment for physicians' services for calendar 
year 2003 take effect.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 22, 2012

s1015

Order 

October 22, 2012

144546

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144546

COA: 300575

St. Clair CC: 09-001342-FC

HAMIN LORENZO DIXON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lloyd Hoffman Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934: and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| DATE:  | **   January 16,  2009** | ** ** | BY:    |          /s/**Lloyd  Hoffman** |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                         |       |   |                                                                        |   |
|   |                                         |       |   | Lloyd Hoffman                                                               |
|   |                                         |       |   | Chief Financial Officer                                                     |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.01**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos.333-110160, 333-101174, 333-123895, and 333-64228 and Form S-8 Nos. 333-114953, 333-69552,333-55886, and 333-55884) of AtheroGenics, Inc., of our reports dated March 7, 2007, with respectto the financial statements of AtheroGenics, Inc., AtheroGenics, Inc. management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of AtheroGenics, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2006.              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP         Atlanta, Georgia