alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Scott R. Doherty, Respondent, v Tammy J. Doherty, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 787]

The father, who is the noncustodial parent of the parties’ now nine-year-old daughter, commenced this proceeding seeking *642modification of the judgment of divorce entered in November 2003 which, inter alia, granted him supervised visitation with the child on a temporary basis, which he could seek to expand after six months from that time. After a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court found that it was in the best interests of the child to allow unsupervised and expanded visitation with the father.

Visitation is a joint right of the noncustodial parent and of the child *(see Weiss v Weiss,*52 NY2d 170, 175 [1981]). In order for the noncustodial parent to develop a meaningful, nurturing relationship with the child, visitation must be frequent and regular *(see Daghir v Daghir,*82 AD2d 191, 193-194 [1981] *affd*56 NY2d 938 [1982]). Absent extraordinary circumstances, where visitation would be detrimental to the child’s well-being, a noncustodial parent has a right to reasonable visitation privileges *(see Matter of Grisanti v Grisanti,*4 AD3d 471, 473 [2004]; *Matter of Schack v Schack,*98 AD2d 802 [1983]).

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the father’s petition to modify the judgment of divorce to provide unsupervised and expanded visitation with the parties’ child. The uncontested evidence showed no extraordinary circumstances existed to justify continued interference with the father’s right to reasonable visitation. Rivera, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Belen, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000885040
<NAME>                        VERMONT PURE. HOLDINGS, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-21-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                     1,112,919
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              3,488,943
<ALLOWANCES>                               372,065
<INVENTORY>                                2,797,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           9,337,014
<PP&E>                                     16,573,373
<DEPRECIATION>                             5,312,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             34,595,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      5,075,527
<BONDS>                                    15,369,131
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   10,340
<OTHER-SE>                                 13,374,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               34,595,224
<SALES>                                    6,423,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           6,423,768
<CGS>                                      2,311,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2,311,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           4,197,726
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         278,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (91,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (91,154)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (91,154)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.01)


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING 

Appellate case name: State of Texas v. Zena Collins Stephens

Ex parte Zena Collins Stephens 

Appellate case numbers: 01-19-00209-CR, 01-19-00243-CR 

Trial court case number: 18DCR0152

Date motion filed: August 14, 2020

Trial court: 344th District Court of Chambers County

Appellee Zena Collins Stephens filed a motion for rehearing of this Court’s July 9, 2020

opinion. The motion for rehearing is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Peter Kelly______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman.

Justice Goodman, dissenting.

Date: __October 6, 2020_______
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           120,717
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 121,451
<CASH>                                          13,758
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          39,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,057,662
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                102,565
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          868,351
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,057,662
<PREMIUMS>                                           9
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              3,886
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 203
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   7,161
<BENEFITS>                                       1,315
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,564
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             2,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,596
<INCOME-TAX>                                       558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,038
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,038
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
[No. 22885-1-III.

Division Three.

November 15, 2005.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Devern A. Merrick, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Walla Walla County, No. 03-1-00080-6, Robert L. Zagelow, J., entered April 2, *2004.Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Kato, C.J., and Brown, J.
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Chart 1-12. The job openings rate generally has moved in the 

opposite direction of the unemployment rate

Unemployment rate

Job openings rate

NOTE: Shaded area represents recession. Data are seasonally adjusted.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Percent

Chart 1-12. The job openings rate generally has moved in the 

opposite direction of the unemployment rate

• The job openings rate (the number of job openings as a percent of employment 

plus job openings) decreased during the 2001 recession. As the job openings 

rate edged up from mid-2003 forward, the unemployment rate declined.

• Neither the unemployment rate nor the job openings rate has returned to prerecession levels.
NOTE: Earnings are median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers. 

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Chart 5-8. Women's earnings have increased substantially as 

a percent of men's

60

65

70

75

80

85

1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006

60

65

70

75

80

85

Women's earnings as a percent of men's

Chart 5-8. Women's earnings have increased substantially as 

a percent of men's

• The ratio of women's to men's earnings, at about 81 percent in 2006, has risen 

sharply since 1979, when it stood at about 63 percent.

• In 2006, black women earned 88 percent of what black men did; among 

Hispanics, the earnings ratio was 87 percent. In contrast, white women’s 

earnings were 80 percent of white men’s and Asian women’s earnings were 79 

percent of Asian men’s.

• This simple comparison of earnings for men and women who usually work full 

time does not control for many factors that can be significant in explaining 

earnings differences, such as educational attainment, occupation, hours of 

work, job tenure, and other factors.
# 2016

# 2017

# 2018
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report on Form 10-Q of Viad Corp for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Viad Corp.
 Date: May 7, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Paul B. DykstraPaul B. DykstraChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          28,767
<SECURITIES>                                    40,781
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                       380
<INVENTORY>                                        487
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,902
<PP&E>                                          10,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,967
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        73,834
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,963
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,997
<SALES>                                         11,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,624
<CGS>                                            1,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,061
<INCOME-TAX>                                       781
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,280
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 559

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain manufacturing equipment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2003

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain manufacturing 

equipment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by striking heading 9902.84.85 and inserting in 

7 numerical sequence the following new heading:
2

•HR 559 IH 

‘‘ 9902.84.85 Extruders to be 

used in production of radial 

tires designed for 

off-the-highway 

use with a rim 

measuring 63.5 

cm or more in diameter (provided 

for in subheading 

4011.20.10, 

4011.61.00, 

4011.63.00, 

4011.69.00, 

4011.92.00, 

4011.94.40, or 

4011.99.45), numerically controlled, or parts 

thereof (provided 

for in subheading 

8477.20.00 or 

8477.90.85) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2005 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Case 3:11-cr-00485-GEB   Document 11   Filed 05/27/11   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 17

Case 3:11-cr-00485-GEB   Document 11   Filed 05/27/11   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 18

Case 3:11-cr-00485-GEB   Document 11   Filed 05/27/11   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 19
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Patrick P. Fourteau, the ChiefExecutive Officer and President of First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation, aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to the best of myknowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-Kand this amendment thereto for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-K”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information containedin this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
|               | By:    | /s/ Patrick P.  Fourteau                       |
|--------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|               |   | Name: Patrick P.  Fourteau                     |
|               |   | Title: *Chief Executive Officer and President* |
| Date: May 1,  2006 |   |                                           |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FirstHorizon Pharmaceutical Corporation and will be retained by First HorizonPharmaceutical Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
63

79

68

58 57 60

78 81

95

88

77 74 73

78

0

20

40

60

80

100

16 years and

over

16 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 years and

over

1979 2006

Chart 5-10. The women’s-to-men’s earnings ratio has 

increased for most major age groups

NOTE: Earnings are median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers. 

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Women's earnings as a percent of men's

Age

Chart 5-10. The women’s-to-men’s earnings ratio has 

increased for most major age groups

• The women's-to-men's earnings ratios have increased for workers under 65 

years old over the 1979-2006 period. The ratio for those 65 years and over was 

unchanged.

• In 2006, the ratios were highest for women 16 to 34 years old.

• Care should be taken in interpreting these data, however, as they provide only a 

snapshot of earnings patterns in 2006. Older women faced a different social 

and economic climate at the start of their work lives than that which exists for 

young women today. Consequently, the lifetime earnings pattern of today’s 

older women is not a reliable guide to the lifetime earnings pattern of today’s 

younger women.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

Microtune, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statement (Form S-8 No’s. 333-120091, 333-144882, 333-150537 and 333-154834) of Microtune, Inc. of our reports dated February 19, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Microtune, Inc. as of December 31, 2008,and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Microtune, Inc. 

 

Dallas, Texas 

February 19, 2009
# MAR 07  0635AM_002

CDR420

Line-In Record

Other

426.13535
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Matritech, Inc. (the registrant):2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release
33-8238, 34-47986 and 33-8760.]c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants third fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/ Richard A. SandbergRichard A. SandbergChief Financial Officer
#### ROOT v. FRIZZELL.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

May 19, 1903.)

No. 1,864.

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

H. C. Brome, John L. Webster, and A. H. Burnett, for plaintiff in error. C. J. Smyth and Ed P. Smith, for defendant in error.

'Reversed, without costs to either party in this court, and without an opinion, and remanded, with directions for further proceedings.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| 1.     | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Qualys Inc.; and |
|   |   |
| 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |  |
| Date:                                           | December 1, 2017 |   |
| By:                                             | /s/ PHILIPPE F. COURTOT |   |
| Philippe F. Courtot                             |   |
| Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Qualys, Inc.                                    |   |
108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 797

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit the use 

of any contribution made to a candidate for election for Federal office, 

or any donation made to an individual as support for the individual’s 

activities as the holder of a Federal office, for the payment of a salary 

to the candidate or individual or to any member of the immediate 

family of the candidate or individual. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit the use of any contribution made to a candidate 

for election for Federal office, or any donation made 

to an individual as support for the individual’s activities 

as the holder of a Federal office, for the payment of 

a salary to the candidate or individual or to any member 

of the immediate family of the candidate or individual.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 797 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Candidate Anti-Cor3 ruption Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING USE OF CONTRIBUTIONS AND DONA5 TIONS FOR SALARIES OF CANDIDATES OR OF6 FICEHOLDERS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 313(b)(2) of the Federal 

8 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 439a(b)(2)), as 

9 amended by section 301 of the Bipartisan Campaign Re10 form Act of 2002, is amended by striking ‘‘is used to’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘is used for the payment of a salary to the 

12 candidate or individual involved or to any member of the 

13 immediate family of the candidate or individual involved, 

14 or is used to’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact17 ment of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, 

18 except that the amendment shall not apply with respect 

19 to any payment of a salary which is made prior to the 

20 expiration of the 60-day period which begins on the date 

21 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ