alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

 

I, **Jance Carten**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Semi-Annual Report on Form N-CSRS for the period ended May 31, 2020 (the “Report”).

 I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

  Date: 07/30/2020  /s/ *Jane Carten*  President 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C 1350)**

 

I, **Christopher Fankhauser**, certify that:

This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Registrant’s Semi-Annual Report on Form N-CSRS for the period ended May 31, 2020 (the “Report”).

I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

Date: 07/30/2020

/s/ *Christopher Fankhauser*Treasurer, Chief Compliance Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. of Section 1350, as
Created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned officer of Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



|(i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 6, 2007



By:

/s/ R. Todd JoyceR. Todd JoyceVice President  Corporate Controller and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of ThermoEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report"), I, Andrew T.
      Melton, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May
      22, 2007




By: /s/
      Andrew T.
      Melton


Name:
      Andrew T. Melton


Title:
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

s0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144825

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144825

COA: 307610

Emmet CC: 11

- 003472

- FH

RYAN SCOTT SYDOW,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 30, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 699 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 699

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a comprehensive 
study of the Rathdrum Prairie/Spokane Valley Aquifer, located in Idaho 
                            and Washington.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 699

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a comprehensive 
study of the Rathdrum Prairie/Spokane Valley Aquifer, located in Idaho 
                            and Washington.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE RATHDRUM PRAIRIE/SPOKANE VALLEY 
              AQUIFER.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation 
with the State of Idaho and the State of Washington, shall conduct a 
comprehensive study of the Rathdrum Prairie/Spokane Valley Aquifer for 
the purpose of preparing a model of the aquifer and establishing for 
those States a mutually acceptable understanding of the aquifer as a 
ground water resource.
    (b) Report.--The Secretary shall submit to the Congress a report on 
the findings and conclusions of the study by not later than 3 years 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    For conducting the study under this Act there is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary $3,500,000.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of DutchFork Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Steve P. Sligh,
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
                  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
                  for the period covered by the Report.

                                      /s/ Steve P. Sligh
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Steve P. Sligh
                                      Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
                                         Officer and Treasurer

December 29, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00818-CV

Carleen RANTZOW f/k/a Carleen Black,

Appellant

v.

Christopher Edward BLACK,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 08-004

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

We ORDER that appellant, Carleen Rantzow f/k/a Carleen Black, bear all costs of this 

appeal.

SIGNED June 12, 2013.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
    /s/  Michael NoleName:
    Michael NoleTitle:
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    February 8, 2010
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

September 9, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50261 Summary Calendar

ALBERT DE LA GARZA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

A.M. STRINGFELLOW; GARY JOHNSON, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; JANIE COCKRELL, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; HECTOR BARRERA; TERRY FOSTER, SR.;
DAN C. LEWIS; DELOIS TARVER; CALVIN DAVIS; MARTIN COBRRUBIAS;
PATRICIA L. CHARLES,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas

(A-02-CV-257-JN)

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Albert De La Garza, Texas prisoner # 645460, appeals the Rule

12(b)(6) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The dismissal

is reviewed de novo

. (De La Garza’s motions for summary judgment,

sanctions, and to strike Appellees’ brief are DENIED .)2

De La Garza’s allegations concerning staff shortages at TDCJ

do not constitute an Eighth Amendment vio lation; for example, he

has not shown that the claimed staff shortage s have led to any

specific problems with security or inmates’ access to food, medical

care, or sanitation. See Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 832-33

(1994); see also Wood s v. Edwards , 51 F.3d 577, 581 (5th Cir.

1995).

De La Garza also asserts the TDCJ must comply with the

staffing requirements of Ruiz v. Johnson

, 37 F. Supp. 2d 855 (S.D.

Tex. 1999), reversed and remanded , 243 F. 3d 941 (5th Cir. 2001),

on remand

, 154 F. Supp. 2d 975, 989 (S.D. Tex. 2001).

Noncompliance with Ruiz is not actionable under § 1983. S ee Green

v. McKaskle , 788 F.2d 1116, 1122 (5th Cir. 1986).

De La Garza has not shown a constitutional violation based on

the allegedly inadequate response to his grievances, being left

unsupervised on several occasions, or being without water for one

and a half hours. See Woods , 51 F.3d at 581; see also Daniels v.

Williams

, 474 U.S. 327, 336 (1986)(negligence does not amount to a

constitutional violation). De La Garza’s claim that he was

verbally abused by a prison guard does not give rise to a § 1983

action. S ee Siglar v. H ightower , 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir.

1997). Further, De La Garza has not shown that prison officials

were deliberately indifferent to a risk of attack by other inmates;

they responded immediately by preparing a life endangerment report3

and granting his request for new housing. S ee Farmer

, 511 U.S. at

847; Woods , 51 F.3d at 581.

For the first time on appeal, De La Garza contends that the

magistrate judge and district judge were biased. De La Garza

failed to present this contention at a reasonable time in the

litigation. S ee Hollywood Fantasy Corp. v. Gabor

, 151 F.3d 203,

216 (5th Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 800

To provide for the withholding of United States contributions to any United 

Nations commission, organization, or affiliated agency that is chaired 

or presided over by a country that has repeatedly provided support 

for acts of international terrorism, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Mr. FOSSELLA (for himself, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. BURR, Mr. CANNON, Mr. 

MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. FRANKS

of Arizona, Mr. HERGER, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. KING of Iowa, 

Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. VITTER, Mr. WILSON of South 

Carolina, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, and Mr. PEARCE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

A BILL

To provide for the withholding of United States contributions 

to any United Nations commission, organization, or affiliated agency that is chaired or presided over by a 

country that has repeatedly provided support for acts 

of international terrorism, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 800 IH 

1 SECTION 1. WITHHOLDING OF UNITED STATES CONTRIBU2 TIONS FOR CERTAIN UNITED NATIONS COM3 MISSIONS, ORGANIZATIONS, OR ANY AFFILI4 ATED AGENCIES. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds 

6 available to the Department of State or any other Federal 

7 department or agency may not be used for the following: 

8 (1) United States contributions to any United 

9 Nations commission, organization, or affiliated agen10 cy that is chaired or presided over by a country, the 

11 government of which the Secretary of State has de12 termined, for purposes of section 6(j)(1) of the Ex13 port Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 

14 2405(j)(1)) has repeatedly provided support for acts 

15 of international terrorism, until such time as the 

16 President determines that such commission, organi17 zation, or agency is no longer chaired or presided 

18 over by such country and the commission, organiza19 tion, or agency has established appropriate electoral 

20 reforms, including minimum standards for leader21 ship positions and the elimination of automatic rota22 tion of such leadership positions. 

23 (2) Expenses for any United States delegation 

24 to any United Nations commission, organization, or 

25 affiliated agency described in paragraph (1) until 
3

•HR 800 IH 

1 such time as the President makes the determination 

2 described in such paragraph.

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5086

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-[[3,3′-Dichloro-4′-[[1-[[(2,4-

dimethylphenyl)amino]carbonyl]-2-oxopropyl]azo][1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl]azo]-

3-oxo-N-(o-tolyl)butyramide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2004

Mr. BERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-[[3,3′-Dichloro-4′-[[1-

[[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)amino]carbonyl]-2-

oxopropyl]azo][1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl]azo]-3-oxo-N-(otolyl)butyramide.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5086 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 2-[[3,3′-DICHLORO-4′-

2 [[1-[[(2,4-

3 DIMETHYLPHENYL)AMINO]CARBONYL]-2-

4 OXOPROPYL]AZO][1,1′-BIPHENYL]-4-YL]AZO]-3-

5 OXO-N-(O-TOLYL)BUTYRAMIDE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.35.14 2-[[3,3′-Dichloro-4′-[[1-

[[(2,4-

dimethylphenyl)amino]carbonyl]-2-

oxopropyl]azo][1,1′-

biphenyl]-4-yl]azo]-3-oxo-N-

(o-tolyl)butyramide (CAS 

No. 78952–72–4) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.17.60) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

12 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Page 29

Exhibit 31.1.  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Chief Executive Officer Certification
Pursuant To Section 302 Of 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

|I, James D. Delamater, certify that:
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|1.                                  
|                                    
|2.                                  
|                                    
|3.                                  
|                                    
|4.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|5.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    



|May 10, 2005 | /s/ James D. Delamater 
|------------ | -----------------------
|             | James D. Delamater     
|             | Chief Executive Officer
3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

Chart 1-12. Since early 2003, the number of hires generally 

has exceeded separations

Hires

Separations

NOTE: Shaded area represents recession. Data are seasonally adjusted.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Thousands

Chart 1-12. Since early 2003, the number of hires generally 

has exceeded separations

• The average number of monthly hires and separations rose through 2003 and 

2004, but showed little net change in 2005. Hires and separations edged up in 

2006, with an average of about 5.0 million hires and 4.6 million separations per 

month.

• The number of hires and separations each month demonstrates that the amount 

of churn in the labor market dwarfs net changes in employment.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5427

To clarify that State tax incentives for business investment in equipment 

and facilities are a reasonable regulation of commerce and are not an 

undue burden upon interstate commerce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2004

Mr. CHANDLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To clarify that State tax incentives for business investment 

in equipment and facilities are a reasonable regulation 

of commerce and are not an undue burden upon interstate commerce.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jobs Investment Act 

5 of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 5427 IH 

1 SEC. 2. STATE TAX INCENTIVES FOR INVESTMENT IN THE 

2 ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLA3 TION, AND REHABILITATION OF IMPROVE4 MENTS, REAL ESTATE, FIXTURES, EQUIP5 MENT, AND FACILITIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—A State may provide to any enti7 ty—

8 (1) a credit against any tax or fee owed to the 

9 State under a State law; or 

10 (2) any other tax incentive, determined by the 

11 State to be appropriate, in an amount calculated 

12 under a formula determined by the State, for invest13 ment in the acquisition, construction, installation, 

14 and rehabilitation of improvements, real estate, fix15 tures, equipment, and facilities located in the State 

16 by the entity that receives such credit or such incen17 tive. 

18 (b) EFFECT ON INTERSTATE COMMERCE.—Any ac19 tion taken by a State in accordance with this section with 

20 respect to a tax or fee payable, or incentive applicable, 

21 for any period beginning after the date of the enactment 

22 of this Act shall—

23 (1) be considered to be a reasonable regulation 

24 of commerce; and 
3

•HR 5427 IH 

1 (2) not be considered an undue burden in inter2 state commerce or otherwise impair, restrain, or dis3 criminate against interstate commerce.

Æ
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1911

In re: KENDALL CHARLES ALEXANDER, a/k/a Kendall C. Alexander, Sr. , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:17

- hc

- 02189

- BO )

Submitted : December 17, 2019 Decided: December 19, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kendall Charles Alexander, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Kendall Charles Alexander petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition . He seeks an order from this court directing the district co urt to act. Our review of the district court’s docket
reveals that the district court dismissed Alexander’s § 2241 petition without prejudice as moot after Alexander failed to timely respond to the district court’s order to show cause on November 19, 2019

. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided
Alexander ’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pr esented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
[No. 22421-0-III.

Division Three.

November 22, 2005.]

#### Rosa E. Mendoza, *Appellant,*v. Farmers Insurance Company of Washington, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 02-2-02444-0, Michael W. Leavitt, J., entered August 29, 2003. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Sweeney, A.C.J., and Brown, J.