alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sean Lacey, Appellant.

[852 NYS2d 895]

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]). By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution *(see People v Toxey,*86 NY2d 725, 726 [1995], *rearg denied*86 NY2d 839*1260[1995]; *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; *People v Townley,*286 AD2d 885 [2001]). This case does not fall within the narrow exception to the preservation doctrine because nothing in the plea allocution cast significant doubt on defendant’s guilt or otherwise called into question the voluntariness of the plea *(see Lopez,*71 NY2d at 666; *People v Welsher,*270 AD2d 839 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 806 [2000]). Finally, the bargained-for sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present— Martoche, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
# 20QRTL4_00
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 7, 2017

NO. 03-16-00004-CV

City of Austin, Appellant

v.

National Media Corporation and ACME Partnership, L.P., Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on December 16, 2015.

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court 

agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses 

the appeal. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court 

below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                  MEDQUIST INC.
                        RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                               AS OF AND FOR THE
                  (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                              <C>               <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS             9-MOS          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1997    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1996       SEP-30-1996    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                11,333            10,427          8,967 
<SECURITIES>                               0                 0              0 
<RECEIVABLES>                         13,121            14,503         15,714 
<ALLOWANCES>                             245               244            318 
<INVENTORY>                                0                 0              0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      25,713            26,131         24,851 
<PP&E>                                12,507            13,621         14,412 
<DEPRECIATION>                         4,452             5,020          5,427 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        70,854            75,643         76,595 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  5,887             7,487          5,783 
<BONDS>                                    0                 0              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0                 0              0 
<PREFERRED>                                0                 0              0 
<COMMON>                                   0                 0              0 
<OTHER-SE>                            58,437            64,996         66,740 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          70,854            75,643         76,595 
<SALES>                                    0                 0              0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      31,600            48,936         68,417 
<CGS>                                      0                 0              0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         23,890            36,936         51,516 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       3,540             5,370          7,505 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0                 0              0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,510             1,583          1,686 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        2,660             5,047          7,710 
<INCOME-TAX>                           1,079             2,041          3,086 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,581             3,006          4,624 
<DISCONTINUED>                             0                 0              0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0                 0              0 
<CHANGES>                                  0                 0              0 
<NET-INCOME>                           1,581             3,006          4,624 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.13              0.20           0.27 
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.11              0.17           0.25 
                                     


</TABLE>
Case 3:11-cv-02020-AET-TJB Document 20 Filed 02/14/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 57
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of--
Northrop Grumman Corporation

Under Contract Nos. 168051 4500046449 4500213428 4500227058 4500268380 4500282529 4500284156 SNR198099 SNT014031 SNT206022 SNU104032

APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60390

Kevin C. Dwyer, Esq. James A. Tucker, Esq. R. Locke Bell, Esq.

Jenner & BlockLLP Washington, DC

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Srikanti Schaffner, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Carson, CA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This appeal arises from an administrative contracting officer's (ACO's) final decision asserting a government monetary claim based on allegedly unallowable direct costs under 11 contracts. The partiesjointly request dismissal ofthis appeal without prejudice because the ACO has since withdrawn the final decision due to a lack of authority to issue the decision because the contracts at issue were contracts over whichthe ACO had no cognizance. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed from the Board's docket without prejudice.

Dated: 1March 2016

# ~~**~J~R~** Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 60390, Appeal ofNorthrop Grumman Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Exhibit
      32








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Annual Report of The Children’s Internet, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Sholeh Hamedani, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------










/S/
      SHOLEH HAMEDANI


Sholeh
      Hamedani,


Chief
      Executive Officer


and
      Chief
      Financial Officer


April
      17,
      2006
Specimen stock certificate for shares of common stock



 Exhibit 4.01 

 
 




 
 WEST CORPORATION 

COMMON 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 SEE REVERSE SIDE 
 FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

 CUSIP 952355 20 4 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
 is the owner of 

FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF 

WEST CORPORATION 
 transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly 

endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of
its duly 
 authorized officers. 
 Dated: 
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TREASURER

 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 
 TRANSFER AGENT 

AND REGISTRAR 
 BY 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 

C 
 AMERICAN FINANCIAL PRINTING INCORPORATED – MINNEAPOLIS 
 THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE 
 IN SOUTH SAINT
PAUL, MN.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 22, 2012

s1015 

# Order

October 22, 2012

144546

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144546

COA: 300575

St. Clair CC: 09

- 001342

- FC

HAMIN LORENZO DIXON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2011

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
ex10-8.htm












Exhibit 10.8







Current Director Fee Arrangements







Directors of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") receive a monthly fee of $1,000, which is the only compensation paid to directors by Bancorp, except for stock options which may be granted in the discretion of the Board of Directors under Bancorp's 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Directors of Great Southern Bank receive a monthly fee of $2,000. The directors of Bancorp and the directors of the Bank are the same individuals. As the sole director of Great Southern Financial Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, William V. Turner, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank, receives a monthly fee of $600 for his service on that board. Effective March 1, 2013, Mr. W. Turner no longer receives a fee for his service as the director of Great Southern Financial Corporation. The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries serving on the Audit Committee are paid a fee of $300 per meeting attended, except for the chairman of the Audit Committee, who is paid a fee of $350 per meeting attended. The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries are not reimbursed for their costs incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.
Exhibit 32
Chief Executive and Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  President  and Chief
Executive Officer of Global Immune  Technologies,  Inc., (the "Company"),  herby
certify that,  to the best of my knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the  "Report")  fully  complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the  registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: December 13, 2006, 2006.                         /s/ Donald Perks
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       CEO and CFO
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5367

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States with respect 

to rattan webbing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2004

Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States with respect to rattan webbing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RATTAN WEBBING. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 46 of the Harmonized 

5 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by strik6 ing subheading 4601.91.20 and inserting the following 

7 new subheading and superior text thereto, with such supe8 rior text having the same degree of indentation as the arti9 cle description for subheading 4601.91.40: 

‘‘ Of one or more of the materials 

bamboo, rattan, willow, or wood: 

4601.91.25 Rattan webbing ......................... Free 20%
2

•HR 5367 IH 

4601.91.30 Other ......................................... 6.6% Free (A, CA, 

CL, E, IL, J, 

JO, MX) 4.9% 

(SG) 

45%

’’. 

1 (b) STAGED RATE REDUCTIONS.—Any staged reduc2 tion of a rate of duty proclaimed by the President before 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act, that—

4 (1) would take effect on or after such date of 

5 enactment, and 

6 (2) would, but for the amendment made by sub7 section (a), apply to subheading 4601.91.20 of the 

8 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, 

9 applies to the corresponding rate of duty set forth in sub10 heading 4601.91.30 of such Schedule (as added by sub11 section (a)).

Æ
Case 2:11-cr-00225-SDW Document 18 Filed 11/04/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 45
Case 2:11-cr-00225-SDW Document 18 Filed 11/04/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 46
Case 2:11-cr-00225-SDW Document 18 Filed 11/04/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 47
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF 

### PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF 

### PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 806 MAL2016 

### Respondent v. 

### MICHAEL J. DOTSKO, Petitioner : Petition 

### forAllowance of

### Appeal from
: the Order ofthe 

### Superior Court

ORDER PER 

### CURIAM AND NOW, this 9th 

### day of May, 2017, the Petition for 

### Allowance of 

### Appeal is DENIED.
# 18SNR05_00

# image1.png
Exhibit
32.1
  Certification
Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 (as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In
connection with the comprehensive report of TransWorld Benefits International,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2005, and
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Charles Seven, as Chairman, President, Chief Executive
Officer, TransWorld Benefits International Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002), that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and
 
 2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:  
April 29, 2008
  TransWorld
Benefits International, Inc.
  /s/  Charles
Seven
 Charles Seven
 Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 1, 2021

b0524

Order 

Clerk

June 1, 2021

160741 & (22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160741

COA: 349773

Lenawee CC: 09-014191-FC

MARSHALL SCOTT SOSBY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2019 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of 

People v Stovall (Docket No. 162425) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the 

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case. The motion for appointment of counsel remains pending.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.01



                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Russell M. Medford and Mark P. Colonnese,
and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-full and agents, with full
power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AtheroGenics, Inc. for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, and any and all amendments thereto, and
other documents in connection therewith, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each
of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-facts and agents or any of them, or their or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

        This power of attorney may be executed in multiple counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original or a facsimile or photocopy of an
original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same power of
attorney.

        This 29th day of March, 2002.


                                       /s/ MICHAEL A. HENOS
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Michael A. Henos


                                       /s/ R. WAYNE ALEXANDER
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       R. Wayne Alexander


                                       /s/ VAUGHN D. BRYSON
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Vaughn D. Bryson


                                       /s/ T. FORCHT DAGI
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       T. Forcht Dagi


                                       /s/ ARTHUR M. PAPPAS
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Arthur M. Pappas


                                       /s/ WILLIAM A. SCOTT
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       William A. Scott


                                       /s/ STEPHEN G. SUDOVAR
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Stephen G. Sudovar
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Jon Suk, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coastal Media Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
7th day of February 2008.


/s/ Jon Suk
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0098 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LIVORIO LOERA,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 8, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 2 2023

08/02/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0098