alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLICACCOUNTANTS

ON INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE

 

 

Shareholders and Board of Trustees

Saturna Investment Trust

Bellingham, Washington

 

In planning and performing our audit of the financialstatements of the Sextant Short-Term Bond Fund, Sextant Bond Income Fund,Sextant Growth Fund, and the Sextant International Fund, each a series of sharesof the Saturna Investment Trust for the year ended November 30, 2001, weconsidered their internal control structure, including procedures forsafeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for thepurpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply withthe requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal controlstructure.

Themanagementof the Funds isresponsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure. Infulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management arerequired to assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal controlstructure policies and procedures.   Two of the objectives of an internalcontrol structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute,assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use ordisposition, and that transactions are executed in accordance withmanagement’s authorization and recorded properly to permit preparation offinancial statements in conformity with accounting principals generally acceptedin the United States of America.
Because of inherent limitations in any internal controlstructure, errors or irregularities may occur and not be detected.   Also,projection of any evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject tothe risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or thatthe effectiveness of the design and operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control structure would notnecessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might bematerial weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute ofCertified Public Accountants.   A material weakness is a condition in which thedesign or operation of the specific internal control structure elements does notreduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities inamounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements beingaudited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in thenormal course of performing their assigned functions.   However, we noted nomatters involving the internal control structure, including procedures forsafeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses, as definedabove, as of November 30, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use ofmanagement and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not intended to beand should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.

 

 

 
**	TAIT, WELLER & BAKER****Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

December 13, 2001**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [A(32c)-10-2009]

A request for clarification of scope has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) by IPR Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (IPR), operator of IPR's pharmaceuticals manufacturing operations within FTZ 7, in Canovanas, Puerto Rico.

Manufacturing authority for pharmaceuticals and intermediates at IPR's FTZ 7 manufacturing facilities was issued on December 14, 2001 (Board Order 1203, 67 FR 71934, 12/03/2002). IPR listed in the original application specific component/product manufacturing which would be performed at the outset and also listed categories of components and products which might be sourced from abroad in the future. IPR has now informed the Board that future production will involve the use of an imported ingredient that was not specifically listed as a foreign-sourced component in the original manufacturing request. The company intends to use a foreign-sourced active ingredient, AZD0530 difumarate (HTSUS 2934.99.3000—6.5%), in production of difumarate tablets (HTSUS 3004.90.9115—duty-free).

The FTZ staff invites the comments of interested parties for consideration in its review. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at the address listed below. The closing period for their receipt is August 21, 2009.

                    A copy of the request will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the “Reading Room” section of the Board's Web site, which is accessible via                     *http://www.trade.gov/​ftz.*                     For further information, contact Diane Finver at                     *Diane_Finver@ita.doc.gov,*                     or (202) 482-1367.                

Dated: July 16, 2009.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-17427 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

Bar Docket No. 13026

In the Matter of D AVID B EN M ANDELBAUM ,

Respondent

.

ORDER OF DISBARMENT

In a letter signed by the respondent on August 8 , 2018, addressed to the C lerk of
the Appellate Courts, respondent David Ben Mandelbaum

, an attorney admitted to the
practice of law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered h is license to practice law
in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (201 8 Kan. S. Ct. R. 261 ).

At the time the respondent surrendered h is license, the office of the Disciplinary Administrator was investigating a complaint all e ging that the respondent violated Kansas

Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(b) (2018 Kan. S. Ct. R. 381) (misconduct), for
violating 26 U.S.C. § 7201 (2016) , attempting to evade or defeat tax. On August 8, 2018,
the respondent entered a plea of guilty to the felony offense.

This court finds that the surrender of the respondent ' s license should be accepted
and that the respondent should be disbarred.

I T I S T HEREFORE O RDERED that David Ben Mandelbaum be and he is hereby
disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas, and h is license and privilege to practice law
are hereby revoke d.

I T I S F URTHER O RDERED t hat the Clerk of the Appellate C ourts strike the name of

David Ben Mandelbaum from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.2

I T I S F URTHER O RDERED that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports,

that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith
shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (201 8 Kan. S. Ct. R. 262 ).

Dated this 21st day of August

, 201 8

.
EXHIBIT 24(b)(10)

           Opinion and Consent of Counsel for Immediate Effectiveness
                                  485(b) Filing



                             See Transmittal Letter
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50972

THE ESTATE OF PAUL MORENO; PAULA MORENO; MANUEL MORENO; SANDRA MORENO, Individually and as next friend of Josiah Moreno and Melody Paula Moreno, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus DILLARD’S, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas

(EP-01-CV-53-GE) July 11, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No.06-40710 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FELIPE ESPINOSA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-693-1
Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: * Felipe Espinosa pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess more than 1000 kilograms of marijuana and was sentenced to a 120-month term of imprisonment. At sentencing, the district court granted the Government’s motion for a sentence under the safety valve provision of18 U.S.C. § 3553(e). As adjusted, Espinosa’s advisory sentencing guidelines range was 87-to-108 months of imprisonment; however, the district court determined that a non-guidelines sentence was appropriate because the evidence showed that Espinosa was United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 9, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-40710

2 involved in at least two separate conspiracies and that he continued to persist in drug-trafficking long after hisactivitieswere interrupted by authorities. The district court held that a 120-month was appropriate because Espinosa’s continued involvement in drug activities was an aggravating factor not taken into account by the Sentencing Guidelines. Espinosa argues that hissentence is the result ofan upward departurefor which he did not receive advance notice and that sentencing court departed upward based on circumstances already considered under the Sentencing Guidelines. Notwithstanding Espinosa’s argument, it is clear from the record that hissentence isa non-guidelinessentence rather than an upward departure. The district court may sua sponte impose a non-guidelines sentence without advance notice to the defendant. U nited States v. Mejia-Huerta, 480 F.3d 713, 722-23 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (April 18,2007) (No. 06-1381). Espinosa’ssentence is reasonable under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) because the district court used the properly calculated advisory Sentencing Guidelines as a frame of reference, identified appropriate reasonsfor the sentencing variance, and made factual findingsto support its sentencing determination. Mejia-Huerta, 480F.3d at 721; United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 710 (5th Cir. 2006). AFFIRMED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 11809 and # 11810]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of WISCONSIN dated 07/15/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         06/18/2009 through 06/19/2009.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         07/15/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/14/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/15/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Kenosha, Racine. *Contiguous Counties:* Wisconsin: Milwaukee, Walworth, Waukesha. Illinois: Lake, Mchenry. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentHomeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
4.875Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.437Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11809 6 and for economic injury is 11810 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Wisconsin, Illinois. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) July 15, 2009. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. E9-17252 Filed 7-20-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Cape Fox Professional Services, LLC 

Under Contract No. N00244-08-C-0032 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60595 

Ronald L. Fouse, Esq. 

Edwin 0. Childs Jr., Esq. 

McGuire Woods LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Robert L. Duecaster, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 27 January 2017 ffedLrift_ 

MARK N. STEMPLER 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60595, Appeal of Cape Fox 

Professional Services, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of PSi Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the
Company), does hereby certify to such officers knowledge that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 16, 2007



|       |  |                                
|------ |  | -------------------------------
|By:    |  | /S/    ARTHUR J. YOUNG,
JR.    
|Name:  |  | Arthur J. Young, Jr.           
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer        
|       | 
|By:    |  | /S/    FRANCISCO H. SUAREZ,
JR.
|Name:  |  | Francisco H. Suarez, Jr.       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
06092/54511

wwwszaferrnanrorn

Ryan A Marrare

Tra.ey C. Hinoon’ *

Robert I. lnkmd’

Thomas J. Manzo’

MeIis’a A, Buff

February 25. 2013

Oar File, J0896,1

Via EUF and Regular Mail

lion, Peter G. Sheridan, U.S.D.J.

Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse

402 Fast State Street, Courtroom 7W

Trenton, NJ 08608 DATED:

4Certified Matnrnonral Attorney

Per trued Cvii and Crinana triO Attorney

‘NJ & PA Bars

NJ & NY Bars

*NJ NY & PA Bars

tUS. Patent & Trademara Ott cc

DEFD:j

Re: Sivolella v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company, et al.

Civil Action No.: I 1-cv-41 94

&

Sanford, et al v. AXA Equitable Funds Management Group, LLC

Civil Action No,: 1 3-cv-03 12

Dear Judge Sheridan:

This firm represents Plaintiffs in the above-referenced consolidated matters. Pending

before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Strike Plaintiffs’ I)emand for a .Jury Trial in both

matters. (Sivolella, Dkt 42) and (Sanford, l)kt 7). This morning. I filed an adjournment request

pertaining to the Sivolella motion (Dkt 43). At that time, I did not make a corresponding

adjournment request pertaining to the Sanford motion. although Plaintiffs are seeking an

adjournment of that motion as well.

The Sanford motion is currently returnable on March 18, 2013, and I am writing to

request that the Court adjourn this motion to the next scheduled motion day, which is April 1,

2013. No prior adjournments or extensions have been sought regarding this motion. and

Defendants do not oppose the request. Further, the requested adjournment should not impact any

other scheduled dates,
C)

CL

c3-•cr

g= 

C)
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd on Form 10-Q for the quarterending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sheldon Hoffman Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934: and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | **August 7, 2008** | ** ** | BY:    | /s/ **Sheldon Hoffman**               |
|--------|-------------------------|------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                    |       |   |                                  |
|   |                    |       |   | Sheldon  Hoffman                      |
|   |                    |       |   | Chief  Executive Officer and Director |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Media Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon
Suk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of November, 2007.


/s/ Jon Suk
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MedQuist Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian J. Kearns, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/Brian J. Kearns
------------------

Brian J. Kearns
Chief Financial Officer

August 12, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5368 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5368

           To suspend temporarily the duty on ACRYPET UT100.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2004

 Mr. Portman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on ACRYPET UT100.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON ACRYPET UT100.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.xx.xx      Methyl              Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         methacrylate                                                       31/2007
                         polymer with N-
                         cyclohexylmaleimi
                         de, styrene, and
                         alpha-
                         methylstyrene
                         (Cas No. 107194-
                         09-2) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3906.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```