alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,930,000
<SECURITIES>                                29,949,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,500,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,501,000
<PP&E>                                      11,837,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,876,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,690,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,991,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       108,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,102,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,690,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,471,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,823,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,796,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,796,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,796,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.90)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher B. Farrell, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Annual Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, based on my knowledge, the information contained in this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

| |  |       |  | /s/CHRISTOPHER B. FARRELLChristopher B. Farrell Chief Financial
Officer
| |  | ----- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Date: |  | October 16, 2007                                                       

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Occam Networks, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the amended Annual Report of Bellacasa Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edwin A. Reilly, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: June 26, 2006

| /s/ Edwin A. Reilly                                                                                                                                                               |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Edwin A. Reilly, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to China Healthcare Acquisition Corp., including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s most recent fiscal year that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s
internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in China Healthcare Acquisition Corp.s internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2007
    /s/ Steven WangSteven Wang, Chief Financial Officer
40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

Chart 5-1. After rising for several decades, the labor force 

participation rate for women has shown no growth in recent 

years

NOTE: Shaded areas represent recessions. Data are seasonally adjusted.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Adult men

Adult women

Percent

Teenagers

Chart 5-1. After rising for several decades, the labor force 

participation rate for women has shown no growth in recent 

years

• The labor force participation rate for adult women rose dramatically during the 

1970s and 1980s. In the 1990s, growth in participation slowed substantially. 

The participation rate has shown no growth in recent years. 

• The participation rate for adult men has drifted down over time.

• The participation rate for teenagers (both sexes, 16 to 19 years old) has trended 

downward since the late 1970s. From 2000 to 2003, the rate declined sharply. 

Since 2003, the rate has held fairly steady. The teen rate is more cyclically 

sensitive than that for adults.
Table 35. Multiple jobholders and multiple jobholding rates by sex and race, May of selected years, 

1970-2007, not seasonally adjusted

(Numbers in thousands)

Multiple jobholders

Number

Percent of 

all multiple 

jobholders

1970........ 78,358 4,048 636 15.7 3,412 5.2 2.2 7.0 5.3 4.4 

1971......... 78,708 4,035 765 19.0 3,270 5.1 2.6 6.7 5.3 3.8 

1972......... 81,224 3,770 735 19.5 3,035 4.6 2.4 6.0 4.8 3.7 

1973....... 83,758 4,262 869 20.4 3,393 5.1 2.7 6.6 5.1 4.7 

1974......... 85,786 3,889 867 22.3 3,022 4.5 2.6 5.8 4.6 3.8 

1975......... 84,146 3,918 956 24.4 2,962 4.7 2.9 5.8 4.8 3.7 

1976....... 87,278 3,948 911 23.1 3,037 4.5 2.6 5.8 4.7 2.8 

1977......... 90,482 4,558 1,241 27.2 3,317 5.0 3.4 6.2 5.3 2.6 

1978......... 93,904 4,493 1,281 28.5 3,212 4.8 3.3 5.8 5.0 3.1 

1979....... 96,327 4,724 1,407 29.8 3,317 4.9 3.5 5.9 5.1 3.0 

1980......... 96,809 4,759 1,549 32.5 3,210 4.9 3.8 5.8 5.1 3.2 

1985......... 106,878 5,730 2,192 38.3 3,537 5.4 4.7 5.9 5.7 3.2 

1989......... 117,084 7,225 3,109 43.0 4,115 6.2 5.9 6.4 6.5 4.3 

1991........ 116,626 7,183 3,129 43.6 4,054 6.2 5.9 6.4 6.4 4.9 

1994........ 122,946 7,316 3,343 45.7 3,973 6.0 5.9 6.0 6.1 4.9 

1995....... 124,554 7,952 3,727 46.9 4,225 6.4 6.5 6.3 6.6 5.2 

1996........ 126,391 7,846 3,494 44.5 4,352 6.2 6.0 6.4 6.4 5.1 

1997........ 129,565 8,197 3,800 46.4 4,398 6.3 6.4 6.3 6.5 5.7 

1998........ 131,476 8,126 3,688 45.4 4,438 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.3 5.5 

1999........ 133,411 7,895 3,778 47.9 4,117 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.0 5.5 

2000........ 136,685 7,751 3,667 47.3 4,084 5.7 5.8 5.6 5.9 4.9 

2001........ 137,121 7,540 3,626 48.1 3,914 5.5 5.7 5.3 5.6 5.3 

2002........ 136,559 7,247 3,511 48.4 3,736 5.3 5.5 5.1 5.5 4.7 

2003........ 137,567 7,338 3,498 47.7 3,841 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.5 4.3 

2004........ 138,867 7,258 3,605 49.7 3,653 5.2 5.6 4.9 5.3 5.1 

2005.........141,730 6,895 3,402 49.3 3,493 4.9 5.2 4.6 5.4 4.4 

2006.........144,041 7,641 3,778 49.4 3,863 5.3 5.7 5.0 5.3 5.4 

2007.........145,864 7,693 3,858 50.1 3,835 5.3 5.7 4.9 5.5 4.4 

Men White

Black or 

African 

American 2

Year Total 

employed

Multiple jobholding rate1

Total

Women

Men Total Women

1 Multiple jobholders as a percent of all employed

persons in specified group.

2 Data for years prior to 1977 refer to the black-andother population group.

NOTE: Data beginning in 1994 are not strictly

comparable with data for prior years. For an explanation, 

see the Historical Comparability documentation provided

at http://www.bls.gov/cps/eetech_methods.pdf.

Comprehensive surveys of multiple jobholders were not

conducted in 1981-84, 1986-88, 1990, and 1992-93.

SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S.

Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

90
#### KHOLOS v. CUTLER.

Civ. A. No. 8377.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

Oct. 23, 1950.

Riñes & Riñes, Robert Needleman, Joan Riñes Needleman and David Riñes, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Roger W. Cutler, Jr., Edward H. Bennett, Jr., Boston, Mass., for defendant.'

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff has filed a motion to compel the defendant to produce certain records and to make complete answers at the taking of a deposition. The defendant resists on the ground that the records were not properly requisitioned either under Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. rule 34 or 45, 28 U.S.C.A. When the defendant appeared before Judge Wyzanski in opposition to the taking of a deposition in Boston, then was when he should have complained of the insufficiency of the notice to produce. It is too late to do so now, and the defendant is ordered within a reasonable time to appear with his records for the purpose of making further answers to the plaintiff’s questions.

*589With reference to the unanswered question on page 37 of the record, referring to the use of a splice other than the Kholos splice, the defendant is bound to answer telling the type of splice that he was using, but he need not give technical information as to the date of invention, etc.
Exhibit 4.36

LOAN AGREEMENT  (this"Agreement")  between  Infineon Technologies Holding B.V., Rotterdam  (the"Issuer")  and  Infineon Technologies AG, Munich  ("Infineon Technologies AG")

WHEREAS:

Now,
therefore, it is agreed as follows:

§ 1  (Definitions)

In
this Agreement terms defined in the Conditions shall have the same meaning herein, unless otherwise required by the context.

§ 2  (The Loan)

€1,000,000,000
(euro one billion) (the"Loan Amount")

.

---



§ 3  (Security Assignment)

§ 4  (Interest; Repayments; Discharge)

§ 5  (Taxes)

All
payments on the Loan shall be made without withholding or deduction of any present or future taxes, duties or governmental charges of whatever nature imposed, levied or withheld by
or in the Federal Republic of Germany or The Netherlands or by or on behalf of any political subdivision or authority thereof or therein having power to tax, unless Infineon Technologies AG is
required by law to withhold or deduct such taxes or duties. The parties agree that any withholdings or deductions on principal of the Loan pursuant to sentence (1) shall not reduce the Loan
Amount.

§ 6  (Amendment or Termination of this Agreement)

The
Issuer and Infineon Technologies AG undertake (subject to the following sentence) not to amend or terminate any provisions of this Agreement and to refrain from anything that could
impair the rights of the Noteholders under the security assignment (§ 3) or otherwise. An amendment or termination of this Agreement shall only be effected if the rights of
the Noteholders are not impaired thereby.

2

---

§ 7  (Waiver of Rights of Set-Off)

With
respect to all claims of the Issuer under this Agreement, Infineon Technologies AG agrees not to assert any rights of set-off, retention rights, liens or counter-claims.

§ 8  (Miscellaneous)

February 1,
2002

Infineon
Technologies Holding B.V.



Infineon
Technologies AG



3

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 8
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

NAME OF WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY                                   LOCATION
Alvarion, Inc.                                                    Delaware
Alvarion UK LTD.                                                  United Kingdom
Alvarion Uruguay SA                                               Uruguay
Alvarion SARL*                                                    France
Alvarion Asia Pacific Ltd.                                        Hong Kong
Floware Do Brasil LTDA                                            Brazil
Alvarion Japan KK                                                 Japan
Alvarion SRL                                                      Romania
Alvarion GmbH*                                                    Germany
Alvarion Israel (2003) Ltd.                                       Israel
Kermadec Telecom B.V.                                             Netherlands
Tadipol-ECI Sp.z o.o.                                             Poland
InnoWave Telsiz Sistemleri Ticaret A.(a).                         Turkey
Floware Inc. (inactive)                                           United States
Breezecom (UK) Ltd. (inactive)                                    United Kingdom
*Alvarion SARL and Alvarion GmbH are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Alvarion
UK LTD.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 5, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0638

Lower Tribunal No. 19-7942-CC

________________

Ft. Trade Financial, Corporation,

Appellant,

vs.

Roadway, Inc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria D. 

Ortiz, Judge.

Wilson Law Firm South Florida, P.A., and Paul E. Wilson (Plantation), 

for appellant.

Benitez & Associates, and Leo Benitez and Lizette Benitez, for 

appellee.

Before EMAS, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Umana v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 282 So. 3d 933, 

934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“[W]hile it is true that the absence of a transcript is 

not necessarily fatal to review of a trial court’s decision at a summary 

judgment hearing, it is not the nature of the hearing, but rather than the 

nature of the alleged error, which dictates the adequacy of the record on 

appeal[.]”) (internal citations omitted); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of 

Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“In appellate proceedings 

the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the 

burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.”).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matritech, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the SEC on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Sandberg, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Matritech, Inc. and will be retained by Matritech, Inc. and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

/s/ Richard A. Sandberg

Richard A. Sandberg
Chief Financial Officer
August 7, 2003
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as amended by Amendment No. 1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (as amended, the
Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2009



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/ DANIEL R. PASSERI                
|Daniel R. Passeri                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
Unemployment rates by parish and disaster assistance 

Louisiana, September 2005, not seasonally adju

Caddo

7.0%

Bossier

7.0%

Union

6.5%

Webster

6.7%

La Salle

5.9%

Catahoula

10.2%

Rapides

Vernon 8.8%

8.4%

Jefferson

Davis

7.0%

Acadia

8.6%

Pointe

Coupee

13.8%

St. Landry

10.5%

Caldwell

7.4%

Madison

11.6%

Winn7.7%

Natchitoches

9.6%

Ouachita

7.6%

West

Carroll

10.8%

Claiborne

6.9% East

Carroll

14.3% Lincoln

8.2%

Morehouse

9.3%

Jackson

6.5%

Red River

8.5%

De Soto

6.8%

Bienville

7.3%

Richland

8.1%

Franklin

10.4%

Tensas

21.5%

Sabine

7.0%

Grant

7.5% Concordia 15.2%

Avoyelles

11.9%

Allen

10.9% Beauregard 8.2%

Evangeline

8.6%

East

Feliciana

9.2%

St.

Helena

23.7%

West

Feliciana

12.4%

Calcasieu

7.7%

Cameron

5.7%

Lafayette

8.6%

Vermilion

6.9%

St. Martin

8.4%

Iberville

12.3%

Assumption

13.9%

St. Mary

12.3%

Iberia

8.8% (St.

Martin)

Laf

1

Terrebonne 11.4%

Ascension

11.0% St. John the Baptist

 N.A.

St.

Charles

N.A.

St.

James

17.5%

Livingston

8.2%

Tangipahoa

18.5%

West

B atonRouge

10.4%

East

B atonRouge

11.6%

7.0% or more6.0% to 6.9%5.0% to 5.9%4.0% to 4.9%3.9% or below

Unemployment Rate

Not available

(State rate = 11.4%; U.S. rate = 4.8%)

NOTE:
Exhibit 32(i)



Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-KSB filed by
American Community Bancshares, Inc. (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in
that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                     |  |                                     |  |                                    
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                     |  | American Community Bancshares, Inc.
|                     |  |                                    
|Date: March 19, 2004 |  | By:                                 |  | /s/ Randy P. Helton                
|                     |  |                                     |  | Randy P. Helton                    
|                     |  |                                     |  | President & Chief Executive Officer
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL; 

REGINALD ENTO; JEFFREY PATRICK

LYONS, JR.; AAKASH DESAI, on

behalf of themselves and others

similarly situated, No. 10-15152 Plaintiffs-Appellants,

D.C. No.

v.  3:09-cv-04779-CRB

KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney ORDER General of California; EVA

STEINBERGER, Assistant Bureau

Chief for DNA Programs,

California Department of Justice,

Defendants-Appellees. 

Filed July 25, 2012

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it

is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed.

R. App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel

opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of

the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Nguyen, Watford and Hurwitz did not participate in

the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be

taken en banc.

8561