alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PRIMEDIA Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles J. Stubbs, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ CHARLES J. STUBBS                
|Charles J. Stubbs,                   
|                                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     

August 7, 2009

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection  with the Annual Report of Bellacasa Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Preiss,  President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 26, 2005

| /s/ Steven Preiss                                                                                                                                                                             |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Steven Preiss, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal        Executive Officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial        Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
# 17SNR06_00

# image1.png
Case 2:11-cv-04049-SDW-MCA Document 14 Filed 12/06/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 98
Case 2:11-cv-04049-SDW-MCA Document 14 Filed 12/06/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 99
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         182,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,736,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    953,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,979,108
<PP&E>                                       9,532,708
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,023,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,742,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,834,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,736,124
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           716
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,742,156
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               500,577
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,692,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,238,878)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,238,878)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max EntertainmentHoldings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ending July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Kilian, President/Treasurer/CEO/CFO of theCompany, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

 

***/s/ Daniel Kilian                                               ***Daniel Kilian, President, Treasurer, CEO, CFO

Dated: September 21, 2007
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in her
capacity as an officer of First Shares Bancorp, Inc. (First Shares), that, to
her knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Annual Report of First Shares on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First
Shares.                                             

Dated: March 28, 2003

|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kimberly B. KlingKimberly B. Kling
Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First Shares Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by First Shares
Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Independent Accountants' Report
The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust IV, Series 2000-1 has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated February 1, 2000 (the Agreement), as supplemented, for the period January 1, 2004 through August 17, 2004. HSBC Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated February 1, 2000, as supplemented, for the period January 1, 2004 through August 17, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.

/s/ KPMG LLP

March 1, 2005

 

 

Management Assertion

 

For the period January 1, 2004 through August 17, 2004, the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust IV, Series 2000-1 has been conducted HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated February 1, 2000, as supplemented.

 

 

/s/ Steve Smith											

Steve Smith 

Servicing Officer 

HSBC Finance Corporation 

 

March 1, 2005                                 	  	

Date	  

 

 

   /s/ Joan Coppenrath    				       /s/ Craig Peters                			
Joan Coppenrath				       Craig Peters

Controller					       Group Director- Asset Management-

HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto Finance	       HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto Finance	

 

March 1, 2005                                 		       March 1, 2005                               	

Date						       Date
# 2011

&8page &P of &N	

# 2012

&8page &P of &N	

# 2013

&8page &P of &N	

# 2014

&8page &P of &N	

# 2015

&8page &P of &N	

# 2016

&8page &P of &N	

# 2017

&8page &P of &N	

# 2018

&8page &P of &N	

# 2019

&8page &P of &N	

# 2020

&8page &P of &N
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                        ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                           SPRING CREEK CAPITAL CORP.
            FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2008
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jagjit Jay Sidhu, am the Chief  Executive  Officer and acting Chief Financial
Officer of Spring Creek Capital Corp., a Nevada  corporation (the "Company").  I
am delivering this  certificate in connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the three  month  period  ended March 31, 2008 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2008
                                         By: /s/ Jagjit Jay Sidhu
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Jagjit Jay Sidhu
                                            Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                            acting Chief Financial Officer,
                                            acting Principal Accounting Officer
                                            and Director
##### 



Exhibit
4.28.2
 The German version of the Subordinated Guarantee is the only legally binding version.
The English translation is for convenience only.
  NACHRANGIGE GARANTIE
 der
 Infineon Technologies AG
Neubiberg, Bundesrepublik Deutschland
(die  Garantin )
zugunsten der Anleihegläubiger der
1,375% Garantierten Nachrangigen
Umtauschschuldverschreibungen von
2007/2010 mit einem Gesamtnennbetrag von 215.000.000
(die  Schuldverschreibungen )
 der
 Infineon Technologies Investment B.V.,
Rotterdam, Niederlande
(die  Anleiheschuldnerin )
 Anleihebedingungen
 SUBORDINATED GUARANTEE
 by
 Infineon Technologies AG,
Neubiberg, Federal Republic of Germany
(the  Guarantor )
in favor of the holders of the
1.375% Guaranteed Subordinated
Exchangeable Notes of 2007/2010 in the
aggregate principal amount of  215,000,000
(the  Notes )
 of
 Infineon Technologies Investment B.V.,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
 (the  Issuer )
 Conditions
 pari passu




---



##### 



Neue
Anleiheschuldnerin
 Substitute Issuer




---



##### 



/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]Wir nehmen die obenstehenden Erklärungen an.
 /s/ Peter LarsenLondon, September 2007Citibank, N.A.
 We accept all of the above
 /s/ Peter LarsenLondon,September 2007Citibank, N.A.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES v. ROY CASTRO

Crim. No. 11-457 (WHW)

581 # 000558815C

PETITION FOR

WRIT HABEAS CORPUS

1. Roy Castro (D/O/B:

is now confined at South Woods State Prison, Bridgeton, New

Jersey.

2. Said individual will be required at the United States District Court, Newark, New Jersey, on

Tuesday. March 27. 2012 at .3Q a.m. for a sentencing hearing before the Honorable William H.

Walls.

A Writ of Habeas Corpus should issue for that purpose.

DATED: 3j(2-(2v2

Let the Writ Issue.

DATED: MarchL2,-2012

SHANAW. CHEN

ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY

ORDER

HON.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WRIT HABEAS CORPUS

The United States of America to Warden of the South Woods State Prison, Bridgeton, New

Jersey. WE COMMAND that you have the body of

ROY CASTRO,

now confined in the South Woods State Prison, brought before the Honorable William H. Walls,

United States District Judge, on March 27, 2012, at 9:30 a.m,, at the United States District Court,

Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, New iTir ?fl? n rnirrt-in ThI hrw, nhnnc,’ mrr J —r — I

WITNESS the Honorable William H. Walls

United States District Judge

Newark, New Jersey

DATED

fl i(,

JJJ

WILLIAM T. WALSH

Clerk of the U.S. District Court

for the District of New Jersey

Per *:: j5Z

Deputylerk
# Index

# Table 5.1

# Table 5.2

# Table 5.3

# Table 5.4
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Donald Norman III v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-16-00359-CR

Trial court case number: 15CR2248

Trial court: 405th District Court

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the abovereferenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 1400 (1967). Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting access to a 

copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief. 

See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

We grant the motion and order the trial court clerk, no later than 10 days from 

the date of this order, to provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the 

reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the appellant. The trial court clerk 

shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, the date upon

which delivery of the record to the appellant is made. Finally, appellant’s response to his 

appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed within 45 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Harvey Brown

  Acting individually 

Date: December 29, 2016
#### The Favorite.1 Peters, Master, etc., *v.*Heller and others.

*(District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.*

March 26, 1886.)

Demurrage—Delay in Unloading.

Damages can be recovered for delay in. unloading upon vessels, where the cargo could have been discharged more quickly upon railroad cars.

In Admiralty.

*Pugh & Flanders,*for libelant.

*Furth & Singer,*for respondents.

1

 Reported by C. B. Taylor, Esq., of the Philadelphia bar.

Butler, J.

The libelant must be allowed two days. The detention was unnecessary. The unloading might have been completed without interruption, if the respondent had been willing to receive it on cars, which were at hand. He desired, however, to have a part of it on vessels, and delayed the work on this account. Having sold the cargo, he desired to deliver it to the several purchasers immediately from the ship. Fully two days’ delay was caused in waiting for vessels, and in changing the unloading tackle back and forth from vessels to cars. For this delay the libelant must be compensated. A fair measure of computation is found in the charter-party. I do not find anything to sustain the allegation that the crew were inefficient, and the unloading delayed on this account.

A decree will be entered for libelant.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Javier Ramirez, Appellant.

[826 NYS2d 184]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered March 31, 1999, as amended March 25, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of conspiracy in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first and third degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 to 15 years, 11 years and SVs to 25 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). While each link in the chain of circumstances might have an innocent explanation when viewed in isolation, the evidence, viewed as a whole, supported the conclusion that defendant was a participant in the drug conspiracy.

The court properly qualified one of the detectives in charge of the investigation as an expert in the meaning of coded communications used by narcotics traffickers and allowed him to testify as to the meaning of code words used by the alleged participants in the subject conspiracy. “In interpreting the coded communications used in this case, the expert properly placed them in light of other facts already in evidence, including facts personally known and testified to by him” *(People v Contreras,*28 AD3d 393, 394 [2006], citing *People v Jones,*73 NY2d 427, 430 [1989]). In particular, the witness noted that a normally innocuous word used in the recorded conversations between defendant and a coconspirator constantly appeared in conversations between that coconspirator and other persons, and that it *461always had a specialized drug-related meaning in those conversations. The expert’s testimony was not speculative, and it did not contain an opinion on defendant’s guilt.

The challenged portion of the prosecutor’s summation, considered in context, drew a reasonable inference from the evidence and was responsive to defense counsel’s summation *(see People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 976 [1998]; *People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 884 [1993]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
# Consumer Expenditures Midyear Update

The Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) news release provides information on the buying habits of American consumers, including data on their expenditures, income, and consumer unit (families and single consumers) characteristics.  This midyear release covers the last two quarters of the year previously published, and the first two quarters of the next year.  For more information, visit the Consumer Expenditure Survey home page at www.bls.gov/cex/.

- Consumer expenditures July 2019-June 2020 are 1.1% lower than prior midyear period
- Consumer expenditures July 2018-June 2019 are 2.7% higher than prior midyear period
- Expenditures for July 2017-June 2018 are 4.0% higher than the July 2016-June 2017 average
- Expenditures for July 2016-June 2017 are 3.9% higher than the July 2015-June 2016 average
- Expenditures for July 2015-June 2016 are 2.3% higher than the July 2014-June 2015 average
- Expenditures for July 2014-June 2015 are 5.9% higher than the July 2013-June 2014 average.
- Expenditures for July 2013-June 2014 are 1.0% higher than the July 2012-June 2013 average
- Expenditures for July 2012-June 2013 are 1.5% higher than the 2011-2012 midyear average
- Expenditures for July 2011 through June 2012 are 1.9% higher than the 2011 annual average
Table 2. Number and percent of establishments reporting green technologies and practices, by industry, August 2011

NAICS 

code Industry 

Number of 

establishments 

reporting at least 

one green 

technology or 

practice 

Total number of 

establishments

Percent of 

establishments 

reporting at least 

one green 

technology or 

practice

Total, all industries1 ................................................... 4,933,500 6,624,600 74.5

11 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting ..................... 64,600 81,900 78.9

21 Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction .................. 13,400 27,100 49.4

22 Utilities ............................................................ 16,900 23,800 71.1

23 Construction ...................................................... 403,200 570,200 70.7

31-33 Manufacturing ...................................................... 221,700 295,200 75.1

42 Wholesale trade ................................................... 302,400 422,700 71.5

44-45 Retail trade ......................................................... 712,900 916,500 77.8

48-49 Transportation and warehousing ................................. 126,800 209,200 60.6

51 Information ......................................................... 94,600 112,800 83.9

52 Finance and insurance ............................................. 294,700 389,300 75.7

53 Real estate and rental and leasing .............................. 206,700 281,500 73.4

54 Professional, scientific, and technical services ............... 540,200 742,600 72.8

55 Management of companies and enterprises ..................... 29,500 41,500 71.1

56 Administrative and waste services .............................. 252,100 359,900 70.0

61 Educational services ............................................. 114,300 142,100 80.5

62 Health care and social assistance ................................. 560,800 736,900 76.1

71 Arts, entertainment, and recreation .............................. 80,200 102,200 78.5

72 Accommodation and food services .............................. 439,900 564,100 78.0

81 Other services (except public administration) .................. 360,200 480,400 75.0

92 Public administration ............................................. 98,300 124,700 78.8

 1 Detail may not sum to total due to rounding.