alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2** **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER** **PURSUANT    TO** **18 U.S.C.    SECTION 1350,** **AS    ADOPTED PURSUANT TO** **SECTION 906    OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Diagnostics,    Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-Q    for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Periodic Report”), I, Ronald L. Rubin, Vice    President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to    section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements    of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange    Act of 1934: and     2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.         Date: November 12, 2007 /s/  Ronald    L. Rubin
GARRY ALLEN ULLAND,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2431

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 22, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

Appellant Garry Allen Ulland, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, CJ., BENTON and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
###### **EXHIBIT 32.2**

###### ** **

Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd on Form 10-Q for the quarter endingJune 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Lloyd Hoffman Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934: and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| DATE:  | **August  9, 2005** |                                              | BY: | /s/ **Lloyd Hoffman** |   |
|--------|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------|-----|-----------------------|--------|
|   |                |                                              |
|   |                | Lloyd Hoffman                                     |
|   |                | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President |

 

----
Exhibit 10.4

 

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 




 

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO 2008 RESTATEMENT

 




 

Iron Mountain Incorporated (the “Company”) hereby further amends the Iron Mountain Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as most recently amended and restated as of January 1, 2008 and as previously amended (the “Plan”), effective immediately.

 

*   *   *   *   *

 

1.                                      Section 5.8 of the Plan shall be amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof:

 

Provided that the applicable revocation period under any release required by the Company has expired before any payment and within the sixty-day period following the Participant’s Retirement, Disability or Other Termination of Employment, subject to the delayed payment rule of Section 6.3 payment shall be made on the sixtieth day following the Retirement, Disability or Other Termination of Employment but may be made earlier to the extent consistent with the terms of the Plan and Section 409A of the Code.

 

*   *   *   *   *

 

2.                                      Except as hereinabove specifically amended, all provisions of the Plan, as previously amended, shall continue in full force and effect; provided, however, that the Company hereby reserves the power from time to time to further amend the Plan.

 

*   *   *   *   *

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Fourth Amendment to 2008 Restatement to be executed in its name and on its behalf this 17th day of December, 2012.

 

	
 
    	
IRON   MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Annie Drapeau
Exhibit 31.1
 BROOKSIDE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS CORP
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brookside Technology Holdings
Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15e for the small business issuer) and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidating subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/  Michael NoleName:
    Michael NoleTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Annual Report of OSK CAPITAL III CORP.(the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Francis Mailhot,
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 7, 2005

                                    /s/ Francis Mailhot
                                    ------------------------
                                    Francis Mailhot
                                     Chief Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certificationof Chairman and Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. of Section 1350, as Created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

Theundersigned officer of Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)                                     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

Date:       May 9, 2007
|        | By:                                   | **/s/  Allen Chao** |
|--------|---------------------------------------|---------------------|
|   | Allen Chao,  Ph.D.                    |
|   | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal  Executive Officer)        |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelyto accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filedfor purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.

----
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER        AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFCIER        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002                 In connection with the quarterly Report of TheraBiogen, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2009as filed        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Kelly T. Hickel, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:                 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.         

August 14, 2009

/s/ Kelly T. Hickel        --------------------------------------        Kelly T. Hickel        Chief Executive Officer        Principal Financial Officer
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

SHANE ALAN RAFFAELE , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 23

- 0464 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2013

- 437445

- 001 The Honorable Jay R. Adleman , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Arizona Attorney General’s Office , Phoenix By Veronica Skinner Counsel for Respondent

Shane Alan Raffaele , Florence Petitioner FILED 10-03-2024STATE v. RAFFAELE Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz , Judge Samuel A. Thumma and Judge Andrew M. Jacobs delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Shane Alan Raffaele seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is Raffaele’s second petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law , this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. S ee S tate v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577 ¶ 19 (2012). It is Petitioner ’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ari z. 537, 538 ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief , and the petition for review. We find t he petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 15, 2005



/s/ DANIEL R. PASSERIDaniel R. Passeri President and Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the filing of Rushmore  Financial  Group,  Inc., and
Subsidiaries  ("the  Company")  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB for the period
ending June 30, 2002 with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof  ("the  Report"),  I,  Randy  Rutledge,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to the 18 U.S.C.  (SS) 1350, as adapted pursuant to
(SS) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of
                           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;
                           and

                  (2)      The  information   contained  in  the  Report  fairly
                           presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Randy Rutledge
------------------
Randy Rutledge
Chief Financial Officer


August 19, 2002
<Page>

                                 EXHIBIT NO 99.2

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

                           PREMIER AUTO FINANCE, INC.

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The undersigned certifies that he is President of Premier Auto Finance, Inc.
(Premier), and that as such is duly authorized to execute and deliver this
certificate on behalf of Premier, as Servicer, in connection with the Sale and
Servicing Agreement (the Sale and Servicing Agreement) dated as of August 24,
2000 by and among Premier, as Servicer, Dealer Auto Receivables Corp. (DARC),
The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee and Dealer Auto Receivables Owner
Trust 2000-1 (Issuer), (all capitalized terms used herein without definition
having the respective meaning set forth in the Sale and Servicing Agreement),
and further certifies and follows:

(1)  This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to Section 9.05 of the Sale
     and Servicing Agreement

(2)  A review of the activities of the Servicer during Calendar year 2001 and of
     Premier's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under
     my supervision.

(3)  To my knowledge, based the review, Premier has fully performed all its
     obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

It is understood and acknowledged that the undersigned is executing this
Certificate not in an individual capacity by solely in his capacity as an
officer and is without any personal liability as to the matters contained in
this Certificate.

In Witness Whereof, I have affixed by signature hereto as of April 12, 2002.

By: /s/ Kevin Diamond
    -------------------------

Printed Name:  Kevin Diamond
Title:         Senior Vice President
d1364174_ex4-18.htm


Exhibit 4.18







ADDENDUM


to


the Management Agreement dated 18/06/2012


(the "Management Agreement")







Between


TRITION SHIPPING LIMITED


of Hong Kong


(as Owner)







And







ALLSEAS MARINE S.A.


of Liberia


(as Manager)







In respect of the management of the Vessel OOCL HONG KONG (the "Vessel")







Notwithstanding the relevant provisions of the Management Agreement, it is this, 18th day of September 2012, mutually agreed between the Owner and the Manager that in the event that the Management Agreement is terminated in accordance with Clause 12.05, then the provisions of the Compensation Agreement between the Manager and Box Ships Inc. dated 12/09/2012, copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, forming an integral part of this Agreement, or any renewal thereof shall be applied."







All other fees, terms, conditions and provisions of the Management Agreement remain unaltered and in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have signed this Addendum this 18th day of September, 2012.



	
 

	
 


	
FOR THE OWNER

	
FOR THE MANAGER


	
 

	
 


	
/s/ Maria Stefanou

	
/s/  George Skrimizeas


	
MARIA STEFANOU

	
GEORGE SKRIMIZEAS


	
Attorney-in-fact

	
Attorney-in-fact
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                 <c>                                 <c>
                                    O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

CENTURY CITY                        400 South Hope Street               TYSONS CORNER
IRVINE SPECTRUM                     Los Angeles, California             WASHINGTON, D.C.
MENLO PARK                          90071-2899                          HONG KONG
NEWPORT BEACH                       Telephone (213) 430-6000            LONDON
NEW YORK                            Facsimile (213) 430-6407            SHANGHAI
SAN FRANCISCO                       Internet: www.omm.com               TOKYO

</TABLE>



May 10, 2002

New World Fund, Inc.
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California  90071

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

 At your request we have examined your Registration Statement on Form N-1A and
the related Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 filed by you with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with the registration under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, of an indefinite number of shares of your common
stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the following Classes:  R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4
and R-5 (collectively, the "CLASS R SHARES").  We are familiar with the
proceedings you have taken in connection with the authorization, issuance and
sale of the Class R Shares.

 Based upon our examination and upon our knowledge of your activities, it is
our opinion that, provided that an appropriate amendment to your Articles of
Incorporation is duly effected before the issued and outstanding Class R Shares
exceed the authorized number specified in the Articles of Incorporation, the
Class R Shares upon issuance and sale in the manner described in the
Registration Statement will constitute validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable shares of your common stock.

 We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0478 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSIAH BRACKETT,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 30, 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 23 2022

12/23/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0478
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00324-CR

Ramsey Orlando Guerrero

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Cause No. S-17-3327CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 8, 2019
Order entered September 19, 2106

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00640-CR

EDGAR MIGUEL GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-20811-H

ORDER

The reporter’s record, due August 31, 2016, has not been filed. The Court ORDERS the 

trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant has been deprived of the 

reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE