alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5327 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5327

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increased 
  exclusion of gain from the sale of a principal residence by certain 
                          widows and widowers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2004

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increased 
  exclusion of gain from the sale of a principal residence by certain 
                          widows and widowers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED EXCLUSION ON SALE OF PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE BY 
              CERTAIN WIDOWS AND WIDOWERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 121(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Special rules for widows and widowers.--In the case 
        of an unmarried individual who was married and whose marriage 
        ceased by reason of the death of such individual's spouse, 
        paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting `$500,000' for 
        `$250,000' if--
                    ``(A) such property was owned by such individual or 
                such individual's spouse immediately before the death 
                of such spouse,
                    ``(B) the requirements of paragraphs (2)(A) and (3) 
                would have been met if such property had been sold 
                immediately before the death of such spouse, and
                    ``(C) the sale or exchange of such property is 
                during the 1-year period beginning on the date of the 
                death of such spouse.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 121(c)(1) of such Code is 
amended by striking ``or (2)'' and inserting ``, (2), or (4)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to sales and exchanges after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, in taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Peter Q. Repetti, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Blackboard Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Dated: March 1, 2005 /s/ PETER Q. REPETTI   Peter Q. Repetti   Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.1 FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICERS CERTIFICATE
ADVANTA BUSINESS CARD MASTER TRUST The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Advanta Bank Corp.,
as Servicer (ABC), pursuant to the Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of August 1, 2000 (as amended and supplemented, the Agreement), among ADVANTA
BUSINESS RECEIVABLES CORP., as transferor, ABC and WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as
owner trustee of ADVANTA BUSINESS CARD MASTER TRUST, does hereby certify that:  1.
    
    ABC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings
as set forth in the Agreement.2.
    
    The undersigned is an Authorized Officer who is duly authorized pursuant
to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trust.3.
    
    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the year ended June 30,
2003, and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under my
supervision.4.
    
    Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement
throughout such year and no default in the performance of such obligations
has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.5.
    
    The following is a description of each default in the performance of the
Servicers obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me
to have been made by the Servicer during the twelve month period ending
June 30, 2003 which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such
default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each
such default and (iii) the current status of each default: NONE In WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
this 17th day of September, 2003. ADVANTA BANK CORP.,
ServicerBy:
    
    /s/ Mark ShapiroName:
    
    Mark ShapiroTitle:
    
    Assistant Vice President-Structured Finance
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5422 

To support the Boy Scouts of America and the Girl Scouts of the United 

States of America. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 24, 2004 

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To support the Boy Scouts of America and the Girl Scouts 

of the United States of America. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUPPORT OUR SCOUTS. 

4 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section the term ‘‘Federal 

5 agency’’ means each department, agency, instrumentality, 

6 or other entity of the United States Government. 

7 (b) IN GENERAL.—No Federal law (including any 

8 rule, regulation, directive, instruction, or order) shall be 

9 construed to limit any Federal agency from providing any 

10 form of support to the Boy Scouts of America or the Girl 
2 

•HR 5422 IH 

1 Scouts of the United States of America (or any organiza2 tion chartered by the Boy Scouts of America or the Girl 

3 Scouts of the United States of America), including— 

4 (1) holding meetings, jamborees, camporees, or 

5 other scouting activities on Federal property if such 

6 organization has received permission from the appro7 priate Federal official responsible for such property; 

8 or 

9 (2) hosting or sponsoring any official event of 

10 such organization. 

Æ
# 15-34

DOD Age Group 15-34 - continued		

DOD Age Group 15-34		

DOD Age Group 15-34 - continued		

DOD Age Group 15-34		

Page &P	

# 35-75
ex10_1.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 





 




  





  











  






 






  





  











  










  





  











  










  





  











  









 


 



	 	/s/ Daniel E. Gorski         
	 	Daniel E. Gorski, President





 


5


 




  





  











  









 


 




	 	/s/ George Fore       
	 	George Fore, President and Executive Director







 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


6
Case 2:11-cv-03679-JLL -MAH Document 14 Filed 11/09/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 196
Case 2:11-cv-03679-JLL -MAH Document 14 Filed 11/09/11 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 197
Case 2:11-cv-03679-JLL -MAH Document 14 Filed 11/09/11 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 198
Case 2:11-cv-03679-JLL -MAH Document 14 Filed 11/09/11 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 199
Case 2:11-cv-03679-JLL -MAH Document 14 Filed 11/09/11 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 200
----

----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| December                7, 2007 | /s/                Albert Aimers              |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                            | Albert                Aimers                  |
|                            | Chief                Executive Officer        |
|                            |                                          |
|                            |                                          |
| December                7, 2007 | /s/                Manu Ohri                  |
|                            | Manu                Ohri                      |
|                            | Chief                Financial Officer        |
|                            | (Principal                Accounting Officer) |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BENJAMIN GAINES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 117 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# 17QRTL2_00

# image1.png
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

NOEL VELASQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF PASSAIC,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No. 11-2075 (SRC)

OPINION

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter was initiated by Order To Show Cause, issued by Magistrate Judge Shipp on

July 14, 2011, directing pro se Plaintiff Noel Velasquez to show cause why the magistrate judge

should not recommend that the district court dismiss this action for failure by Plaintiff to

prosecute his action and to comply with court orders directing him to appear for conferences. 

The Order To Show Cause expressly warned that should Plaintiff fail to appear in person to show

cause as ordered, Judge Shipp would recommend that the district judge dismiss this action. Judge

Shipp issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on January 13, 2012 pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 72(b), L. Civ. R. 72.1(a)(2), and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) [docket entry 10]. According

to the R&R, Plaintiff neither appeared as required by the Order To Show Cause nor filed a prehearing written submission. 

Judge Shipp recommends that this Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, which permits the Court to “dismiss the action . . . or render

a judgment by default against the disobedient party.” Roadway Express v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752,

Case 2:11-cv-02075-SRC-MAS Document 12 Filed 01/31/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 64
763 (1980) (citations omitted). The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) (“Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and

file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of

court.”). No objections to it have been filed. This Court has reviewed Judge Shipp’s R&R. It

accepts and agrees with Judge Shipp’s findings and recommendation in whole. Plaintiff’s noncompliance with court orders, apparent disinterest in prosecuting his case and overall dilatory

behavior warrant imposing the sanction of dismissal pursuant to Rule 37.

Accordingly, this Court will adopt the R&R issued on January 13, 2012 [docket entry 10]

as the opinion of the Court and will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 37. An appropriate form of Order will be filed.

 s/Stanley R. Chesler 

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge

DATED: January 31, 2012

2

Case 2:11-cv-02075-SRC-MAS Document 12 Filed 01/31/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 65
Table 34. Labor force status of persons 16 to 24 years old by school enrollment, sex, and educational 

attainment, October 2007

(Numbers in thousands)

Enrolled in school........................... 21,061 8,979 42.6 8,181 38.8 798 8.9 12,083 

 Women........................................ 10,717 4,884 45.6 4,470 41.7 414 8.5 5,833 

 Men.............................................. 10,344 4,095 39.6 3,711 35.9 383 9.4 6,250 

 Enrolled in high school 1

..................... 9,724 2,855 29.4 2,421 24.9 434 15.2 6,869 

 Women........................................ 4,607 1,425 30.9 1,218 26.4 206 14.5 3,182 

 Men........................................... 5,118 1,431 28.0 1,203 23.5 227 15.9 3,687 

 Enrolled in college.......................... 11,337 6,124 54.0 5,760 50.8 364 5.9 5,213 

 Women........................................ 6,110 3,460 56.6 3,252 53.2 208 6.0 2,651 

 Men........................................... 5,226 2,664 51.0 2,508 48.0 156 5.9 2,563 

Not enrolled in school....................... 16,419 13,264 80.8 11,740 71.5 1,524 11.5 3,155 

 Women........................................ 7,823 5,710 73.0 5,112 65.3 598 10.5 2,113 

 Less than a high school diploma ...... 1,419 689 48.6 558 39.3 131 19.0 730 

 High school graduates, no college 2 . 3,340 2,371 71.0 2,077 62.2 294 12.4 969 

 Some college or associate degree ... 1,884 1,527 81.1 1,416 75.1 112 7.3 357 

 Bachelor’s degree and higher ........... 1,180 1,122 95.1 1,061 90.0 61 5.4 58 

 Men............................................. 8,595 7,554 87.9 6,628 77.1 926 12.3 1,042 

 Less than a high school diploma ...... 1,859 1,496 80.5 1,261 67.8 236 15.7 362 

 High school graduates, no college 2 . 4,073 3,544 87.0 3,069 75.3 475 13.4 529 

 Some college or associate degree ... 1,768 1,662 94.0 1,509 85.4 152 9.2 106 

 Bachelor’s degree and higher ........... 895 852 95.1 789 88.1 63 7.4 44 

Total

Percent 

of labor 

force

Characteristic

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

 Civilian labor force 

 Not in 

labor 

Total force 

Percent 

of 

population 

 Employed Unemployed 

Total

Percent 

of 

population 

 1 Includes a small number of persons enrolled in grades below high school. 

 2 Includes high school diploma or equivalent.

NOTE: Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not equal totals. The weights used in estimation were revised

with the release of October 2007 data. As a result, the 2007 October data are not strictly comparable with published estimates

from earlier years.

 SOURCE: October 2007 Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

89
# Access to and Use of Leave-2011 Data from the American Time Use Survey

The Access to and Use of Leave news release will provide data on wage and salary workers¿ access to and use of paid and unpaid leave in 2011 by selected worker characteristics and demographic groups.  These findings are from the 2011 American Time Use Survey (ATUS).  Also included are data about workers' ability to adjust their work schedules or location instead of taking leave. For more information, visit the American Time Use Survey home page at www.bls.gov/tus/.

- Access to and Use of Leave - 2011 Data from the American Time Use Survey
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 738

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify that fill material 

cannot be comprised of waste. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2003

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Ms. BALDWIN, 

Mr. DEFAZIO, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. HOLT, Mr. 

HONDA, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. LEACH, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. 

WEXLER, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mrs. CAPPS, and Mr. SMITH of Washington) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify 

that fill material cannot be comprised of waste.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Water Protec5 tion Act’’. 
2

•HR 738 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF FILL MATERIAL. 

2 Section 502 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

3 Act (33 U.S.C. 1362) is amended by adding at the end 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(24) FILL MATERIAL.—The term ‘fill material’ 

6 means any pollutant which replaces portions of the 

7 waters of the United States with dry land or which 

8 changes the bottom elevation of a water body for 

9 any purpose. The term does not include any pollut10 ant discharged into the water primarily to dispose of 

11 waste.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
              ----------------------------------------------------

                   CHASE CREDIT CARD OWNER TRUST SERIES 2000-1

              ----------------------------------------------------



         The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, as Administrator pursuant to the Indenture for the Chase
Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2000-1 does hereby certify that:

                  1.       The undersigned is an Authorized Officer pursuant to
                  the Indenture to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
                  Indenture Trustee.

                  2.       This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.9
                  of the Indenture.

                  3.       A review of the activities of the Issuer for the
                  calendar year ended December 31, 2003, and of performance
                  under this Indenture has been made under the supervision of
                  the undersigned.

                  4.       To the best of the undersigned knowledge, based on
                  such review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and
                  covenants in all material respects under this Indenture for
                  the calendar year ended December 31, 2003. No default in the
                  compliance of any such condition or covenant has occurred or
                  is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

                  5.       The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Issuer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Indenture known to the undersigned to have been made
                  during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature
                  of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Issuer, if
                  any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
                  of each such default: NONE.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 30th day of March, 2004.

                                          By: CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                          National Association, as Administrator




                                          By: /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
                                              ----------------------------------
                                          Name:  Patricia M. Garvey
                                          Title: Vice President
#### In the Matter of Richard Reyes, Petitioner, v Lucian F. Leclaire, Jr., Respondent.

[853 NYS2d 899]

When reviewing a prison disciplinary determination, the court must decide whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Ramsey v Phillips,*11 AD3d 470 [2004]; *Matter of Glover v Goord,*262 AD2d 483 [1999]). Here, a review of the record, including the misbehavior report *885and the testimony of Correction Officer Miller, reveals that there was substantial evidence to support the respondent’s determination that the petitioner violated prison rules. The credibility issues were resolved by the Hearing Officer as the trier of fact and we perceive no basis upon which to disturb his determination *(see Matter of Gilzene v McGinnis,*300 AD2d 658 [2002]; *Matter of Ramos v Goord,*286 AD2d 392 [2001]; *Matter of Rivera v Selsky,*266 AD2d 295 [1999]).

The petitioner contends that the hearing was unfair in that he was denied an opportunity to present evidence of a previous involuntary protective custody (hereinafter IPC) report filed against him. However, the prior IPC report was irrelevant since the petitioner failed to demonstrate how the document had any bearing on this case. Thus, it was properly excluded by the Hearing Officer *(see Matter of Caraway v Herbert,*285 AD2d 778, 779 [2001]).

The petitioner failed to demonstrate that the Hearing Officer was biased against him. The record demonstrates that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner and that the determination was not the result of any bias on the part of the Hearing Officer *(see Matter of Griffin v Goord,*43 AD3d 591, 592 [2007]; *Matter of Cayenne v Goord,*16 AD3d 782, 783-784 [2005]). Spolzino, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.