alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 4. Employment status by marital status and sex, 2007 annual averages

(Numbers in thousands)

 Civilian labor force 

 Employed Unemployed 

 Total 

Percent 

of 

population 

 Total 

 Percent 

of labor 

force 

Total

Total, 16 years and over...... 231,867 153,124 66.0 146,047 63.0 7,078 4.6 78,743

 Married, spouse present...... 122,234 84,401 69.0 82,146 67.2 2,255 2.7 37,833

 Unmarried, total............... 109,633 68,723 62.7 63,901 58.3 4,822 7.0 40,910

 Never married............... 64,869 44,020 67.9 40,466 62.4 3,555 8.1 20,848

 Other marital status......... 44,764 24,703 55.2 23,435 52.4 1,268 5.1 20,061

 Divorced..................... 22,653 16,241 71.7 15,441 68.2 800 4.9 6,412

 Separated..................... 8,107 5,677 70.0 5,325 65.7 352 6.2 2,430

 Widowed...................... 14,004 2,784 19.9 2,669 19.1 115 4.1 11,219

Women

Total, 16 years and over...... 119,694 70,988 59.3 67,792 56.6 3,196 4.5 48,707

 Married, spouse present...... 60,474 36,881 61.0 35,832 59.3 1,049 2.8 23,593

 Unmarried, total................ 59,220 34,107 57.6 31,960 54.0 2,146 6.3 25,113

 Never married.................. 30,219 19,745 65.3 18,322 60.6 1,422 7.2 10,475

 Other marital status......... 29,001 14,362 49.5 13,638 47.0 724 5.0 14,639

 Divorced..................... 13,292 9,346 70.3 8,904 67.0 441 4.7 3,946

 Separated..................... 4,497 2,907 64.6 2,710 60.3 197 6.8 1,590

 Widowed..................... 11,212 2,109 18.8 2,024 18.0 86 4.1 9,103

Men

Total, 16 years and over...... 112,173 82,136 73.2 78,254 69.8 3,882 4.7 30,036

 Married, spouse present...... 61,760 47,520 76.9 46,314 75.0 1,206 2.5 14,240

 Unmarried, total............... 50,413 34,616 68.7 31,941 63.4 2,676 7.7 15,796

 Never married............... 34,650 24,276 70.1 22,143 63.9 2,132 8.8 10,374

 Other marital status......... 15,763 10,341 65.6 9,797 62.2 544 5.3 5,423

 Divorced..................... 9,362 6,895 73.7 6,537 69.8 358 5.2 2,466

 Separated................... 3,610 2,770 76.7 2,615 72.4 155 5.6 840

 Widowed..................... 2,792 675 24.2 645 23.1 30 4.4 2,117

 SOURCE: Current Population Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Marital status and sex

 Civilian 

noninstitutional 

population 

 Not in 

labor 

force Total 

Percent 

of 

population 

12
Exhibit 10.6

 

Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Agreement

 

This Amendment dated November 28, 2012 to the  Restricted Stock Unit Agreement entered into on or about May 27, 2010 (“RSU Agreement”) between KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation (the “Company”) and Andrea Tarbox (‘Grantee”).

 

                WHEREAS, on May 27, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (“Compensation Committee”) granted long term incentive awards to certain employees in the form of restricted stock units (RSUs) and stock options;

 

                WHEREAS, pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s action, Grantee was awarded 12,764 RSUs having a vesting date of May 27, 2013;

 

                WHEREAS, on November 20, 2012, the Compensation Committee adopted a resolution directing that the Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreements pertaining to the RSUs awarded on May 27, 2010 be amended to reflect an accelerated vesting date of November 28, 2012 except for Matt Kaplan and those grantees who will have attained the age of 65 years on or prior to November 28, 2012; and

 

                WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee further resolved that the RSU Agreement be amended to provide that in the event that Grantee is not employed by the Company on May 27, 2013 (other than by reason of death or disability), Grantee shall pay the Company an amount equal to the value of the RSUs plus any special dividends arising out of her ownership of the Company’s common stock converted from such RSUs.

 

                NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Company and Grantee agree to amend the RSU Agreement as follows:

 

1.              Grantee and the Company agree to amend the vesting date for the RSUs from May 27, 2013 to November 28, 2012.

 

2.              Grantee agrees that in the event she is not employed by the Company on May 27, 2013 (except by reason of her death or disability), she will promptly pay the Company (i) an amount equal to the product of 12,764 shares of common stock times the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last day of her employment with the Company, (ii) plus $25,528 (representing the $2.00 special dividend paid on 12,764 shares of the Company’s common stock).

 

Signature page follows

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement to be executed as of the date first set forth above.

 

 

	
/S/ Andrea K. Tarbox
    	
 
    
	
Andrea K. Tarbox
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/S/ Roger W. Stone
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Roger W. Stone
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Chairman and CEO
    	
 
    


 

 

Signature page to Amendment dated November 28, 2012 to Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement entered into on or about May 27, 2010 between Andrea Tarbox and KapStone Paper and Packaging Agreement
#### NICHOLS v. GLASIER.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

May 6, 1903.)

No. 1,818.

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri.

R. P. & C. B. Williams, for plaintiff in error. Gardiner Lathrop and Tom H. Reynolds, for defendant in error.

Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to rule 23 (90 Fed. elxiii, 31 C. C. A. clxiii), on motion of defendant in error.

See 112 Fed. 877.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Perry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of DirectView, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
   including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
   those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
   controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
   the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
   the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
   internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
   business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
   fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
   affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
   issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
   process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
   control over financial reporting.

Date: May 17, 2004

/s/ Michael Perry
Michael Perry
Cheif Executive Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

J ARVIS JACKSON
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 23

- 140

[ June 29, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 from the Circuit Court for the

Fif teenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Daliah H. Weiss

, Judge;

L.T. Case No. 50 2009 CF 001912 A

.

Andrea Flynn Mogensen of Law Office Andrea Flynn Mogensen, PA

, Sarasota

, for appellant

.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for app ellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

F ORST

, K UNTZ and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orthofix International N.V. (Orthofix) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2011 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian McCollum, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance of Orthofix, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Orthofix.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                    |  |                                                             
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 10, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Brian McCollum
|                    |  |  |  | Name:              |  | Brian McCollum                                              
|                    |  |  |  | Title:             |  | Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President of Finance
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-121230) pertaining to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the 2004 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan of Conor Medsystems, Inc. of ourreports dated March 9, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Conor Medsystems, Inc., Conor Medsystems, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Conor Medsystems, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Palo Alto, California 

March 10, 2006
Ableu tize 

Pickering 

' J. 

tunic J. J. 

statement and the record on appeal, we conclude that, regardless of any 

conflicting evidence, the district court did not clearly err in finding that 

probable cause existed to grant the petition based on respondent's 

declaration stating under penalty of perjury that he had wrapped his arm 

around appellant's face and later noticed a bite mark and bleeding 

immediately after appellant was subdued. See Han,nam v. Brown, 114 

Nev. 350, 358, 956 P.2d 794, 799 (1998) (reviewing the district court's 

finding of probable cause in a will contest action under a clearly erroneous 

standard); cf. Sheriff, Clark Cnty. v. Badillo, 95 Nev. 593, 595-95, 600 P.2d 

221, 222 (1979) (recognizing, in the context of whether there was sufficient 

probable cause to find that an individual had committed a criminal 

offense, that a finding of probable cause "may be based on slight evidence," 

and that conflicting testimony will not undermine a finding of probable 

cause). 

Based on the above discussion, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.' 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

'Because respondent's declaration was sufficient to support the 

finding of probable cause, we conclude that our review of the transcript 

requested by appellant is unnecessary. Further, we have considered 

appellant's July 18, 2013, letter regarding the appeal statement, August 

30, 2013, filing, September 3 and 23, 2013, memoranda to the court, 

March 10, 2014, communication regarding a petition for a writ of 

mandamus, and May 29, 2014, communication to this court, and we deny 

the relief sought by these documents. 

(0) I-947A 
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge 

Jerry Doran Pough, Sr. 

Eglet Wall Christiansen 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A
H. R. 5364

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5505 Stevens

Way in San Diego, California, as the ‘‘Earl B. Gilliam/Imperial Avenue Post

Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

5505 Stevens Way in San Diego, California, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Earl B. Gilliam/Imperial Avenue Post Office

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Earl B.

Gilliam/Imperial Avenue Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# CFOI all_worker 2003-2018

Fatal occupational injuries by selected characteristics, 2003-2018 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries by selected characteristics, 2003-2018		

Fatal occupational injuries by selected characteristics, 2003-2018 - continued		

Fatal occupational injuries by selected characteristics, 2003-2018		

Page &P
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-17492

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:08-cr-00005-MW-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

KARRIECE QUONTREL DAVIS, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(February 5, 2018)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 16-17492 Date Filed: 02/05/2018 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Karriece Davis, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district 

court’s denial of his motion for credit for time served and denial of his motion for 

reconsideration. Davis’s notice of appeal in this case states that he wishes to 

appeal the order denying his motion for reconsideration, but his appellate brief in 

this case discusses the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

60(b) motion for relief from judgment from which Davis has filed a separate notice 

of appeal. 

An appellant’s brief must contain a statement of all of the issues presented 

for review. Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(5). We liberally construe pro se pleadings. 

Tannenbaum v. United States, 148 F.3d 1262, 1263 (11th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). 

A pro se appellant nonetheless still abandons an issue when he fails to offer 

argument on the issue in his brief. Timson v. Sampson, 518 F.3d 870, 874 (11th 

Cir. 2008) (per curiam).

Davis has not raised any argument in his brief challenging the district court’s 

denials of his motion for credit for time served and his motion for reconsideration. 

He thus has abandoned any challenge to those denials. See id. Accordingly, we 

must affirm because Davis has not shown that the district court erred by denying 

his motion for credit for time served or his motion for reconsideration.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-17492 Date Filed: 02/05/2018 Page: 2 of 2
Joseph P. La Sala 

MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY & CARPENTER, LLP

1300 Mount Kemble Avenue

P.O. Box 2075

Morristown, NJ 07962-2075 

Phone: (973) 993-8100

Facsimile: (973) 425-0161

Jlasala@mdmc-law.com

Attorneys for Defendants Express Scripts, Inc., Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc., Aristotle Holding, Inc. 

and Plato Merger Sub, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN RE: 

MEDCO/EXPRESS SCRIPTS MERGER 

LITIGATION

Civil Action No. 11-4211 (DMC) (MF)

CERTIFICATION OF JOSEPH P. 

LA SALA IN OPPOSITION TO 

MOTION FOR CLASS 

CERTIFICATION

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

JOSEPH P. LA SALA hereby certifies that:

1. I am a member of the law firm of McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, 

LLP, attorneys for Defendants Express Scripts, Inc., Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc., Aristotle 

Holding, Inc. and Plato Merger Sub, Inc. (collectively, "Express Scripts") in the above-captioned 

action. I submit this Certification in opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification. 2. I have attached hereto as Exhibit A, Order Granting Motion for Appointment of 

Lead Plaintiffs, for Appointment of Co-Lead and Liaison Counsel and Class Certification in In 

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 47-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2361
2

re Medco Health Solutions, Inc. S'holders Litig., C.A No. 6720-CS (Del. Ch.), dated August 23, 

2011. 3. I have attached hereto as Exhibit B, In re Medco Health Solutions, Inc. S'holders 

Litig., C.A. No. 6720-CS (Del. Ch. Aug. 11, 2011) (TRANSCRIPT)

4. I have attached hereto as Exhibit C, In re Medco Health Solutions, Inc. S'holders 

Litig., C.A. No. 6720-CS (Del. Ch. Aug. 23, 2011) (TRANSCRIPT).

5. I have attached hereto as Exhibit D, Affidavit of Philip C. Smith on Support of 

Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs and Co-Lead and Liaison Counsel and Class 

Certification of Plaintiffs Labourers' Pension Fund of Central and Eastern Canada, Gila 

Heimowitz, and Michael Waber.

6. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on September 6, 2011

/s/ Joseph P. La Sala

 Joseph P. La Sala

Case 2:11-cv-04211-DMC -MF Document 47-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2362
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Board of Directorsof SMTC Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-44250) on Form S-8 and the registration statement(No. 333-115400) on Form S-1 of SMTC Corporation of our report dated April 6, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of SMTC Corporation as of December 31, 2007 and January 4, 2009, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and the period from January 1, 2008 to January 4, 2009, and the related financialstatement schedule, which report appears in the January 4, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of SMTC Corporation. 

/s/KPMG LLP 

Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants 

Toronto, Canada 

April 6, 2009
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30,
2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 By:
    /s/  Bryan McGuireName:
    Bryan McGuireTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    May 15, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010 of Stein Mart, Inc. (the Form 10-Q), I,
David H. Stovall, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: June 9, 2010 |  | /s/ David H. Stovall, Jr.            
|                   |  | David H. Stovall, Jr.                
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 10.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Havas (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alain de Pouzilhac, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| May 20, 2003                              |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Alain de Pouzilhac                    |   |   |        |
|                                           |   |   |   |
| Alain de PouzilhacChief Executive Officer |   |   |   |

 

 

----