Exhibit 34.2Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmThe Board of DirectorsThe Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas:We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix I, that the Trust &Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas (collectively the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e.,transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)residential mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities issued on or after January1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration or paying agentservices, excluding any publicly issued transactions, sponsored or issued by any governmentsponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(iv),1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x),1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv), which the Company hasdetermined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of andfor the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company’scompliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onmanagement’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing suchother procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testingof less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise thePlatform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, anddetermining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited tothe selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the periodcovered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may haveoccurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amountscalculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selectedtransactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basisfor our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliancewith the servicing criteria.As described in management’s assertion included in the accompanying Appendix I, for servicingcriteria 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), the Company has engaged various vendorsto perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined thatthese vendors are not considered a “servicer” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and theCompany has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteriaapplicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the
 

 
SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations(“Interpretation 17.06”). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that ithas policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors’activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor.The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to applyInterpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and weperformed no procedures with respect to the Company’s eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicingcriteria, including servicing criteria 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) for whichcompliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the twelvemonths ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects./s/ KPMG LLPChicago, Illinois