alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

FORESTAR GROUP INC. 
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
 Amendment No. 1

 This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Forestar Group Inc. Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) is made by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Forestar Group Inc. (the “Company”), as follows: 

WHEREAS, the Company sponsors the Plan for benefit of its eligible employees; 

WHEREAS, the Board has authority to effectuate amendments to the Plan; and 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan, as set forth below, to reflect the current name of the Company and to revise a
definitional cross reference to the Forestar Group Inc. Savings and Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) that is no longer applicable due to a recent restatement of the Retirement Plan. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby amends the Plan as follows: 

1. Change References to the Company. Each and every reference within the Plan to “Forestar Real Estate Group Inc.” is
hereby replaced with “Forestar Group Inc.” 
 2. Eliminate a Certain Cross-Reference to the Retirement Plan. The
reference in Section 5.2(b) of the Plan to “the U.S. Treasury Fund (within the meaning of the Retirement Plan)” is hereby replaced with “the S&P/BGCantor 7-10 Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index 1 Year Annualized Return”.

 3. Effect on the Plan. Except as otherwise set forth in this Amendment No. 1, the Plan shall remain in full force
and effect. 
 4. Effective Date of this Amendment. This Amendment shall become effective as of November 13, 2012.
Unemployment rates by state,

2023 annual averages

(U.S. rate = 3.6 percent)

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Local Area Unemployment Statistics

5.0% or higher

4.5% to 4.9%

4.0% to 4.4%

3.5% to 3.9%

3.0% to 3.4%

2.5% to 2.9%

2.4% or lower
Jane Carten
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Christopher Fankhauser
Agriculture, 

forestry, fishing, 

and hunting

Mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale and retail trade Transportation and utilities Information Financial activities Professional and business services Education and health services Leisure 

hospit

Total for industry (in thousands)......... 2,358 505 10,022 18,437 19,864 7,295 3,918 9,461 13,911 26,887 1

Percent................................................ 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Agriculture........................................... 82.7 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 [ 1 ] [ 1 ] 8.1 [ 1 ] Mining................................................ 0.1 85.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 [ 1 ] 0.1 0.1 [ 1 ] Construction.......................................... 0.4 2.4 89.2 0.7 0.6 1.2 0.9 0.3 1.0 0.1 Manufacturing....................................... 6.0 4.4 2.4 90.0 2.7 1.4 22.4 0.4 2.9 0.3 Transportation and public utilities............... 0.4 1.2 1.1 0.5 0.7 90.1 47.5 0.6 4.5 0.6 Wholesale and retail trade........................ 3.1 4.3 2.6 5.4 92.2 2.7 3.5 1.4 3.1 0.6 

Finance, insurance, and real estate......... 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 88.2 1.5 0.3 

Services............................................. 6.6 2.0 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.4 25.0 8.6 78.2 97.2 Public administration............................. 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 

1Value less than 0.05

NOTE: Estimates are based on three-year average employment (2000-2002).SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey.

Table 4. Distribution of employment from the 2002 to the 1990 Census Industrial Classification by major industry group

(Percent distribution)

1990 Industry Group

2002 Industry Group
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of SPEAR & JACKSON,
INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending September 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William Fletcher, principal accounting officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                   /s/  William Fletcher
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                  Name: William Fletcher
                                                 Title: Principal Financial and
                                                        Accounting Officer
                                                 Dated: January 13, 2004
|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |

| /s/ Richard E. Bagley                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Richard      E. Bagley, President and Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting      Officer)             |
| March 23,      2009                                           |
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 829 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 829

To amend the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act to increase the amount of 
 loss or damage coverage, in the aggregate and for single exhibitions, 
                        authorized by such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2003

 Ms. McCollum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act to increase the amount of 
 loss or damage coverage, in the aggregate and for single exhibitions, 
                        authorized by such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act 
Amendments of 2003''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 5 of the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act (20 U.S.C. 974) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b) by striking ``$5,000,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$8,000,000,000'',
            (2) in subsection (c) by striking ``$500,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$750,000,000'', and
            (3) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (4) by striking ``$200,000'' and 
                inserting ``$200,000,000'',
                    (B) in paragraph (6)--
                            (i) by striking ``chapter'' and inserting 
                        ``Act'', and
                            (ii) by striking ``or'' at the end,
                    (C) in paragraph (7)--
                            (i) by striking ``$400,000,000 or more, 
                        then coverage under this chapter'' and 
                        inserting ``not less than $400,000,000 but less 
                        than $500,000,000, then coverage under this 
                        Act'', and
                            (ii) by striking the period at the end and 
                        inserting ``; or'', and
                    (D) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) $500,000,000 or more, the coverage under this Act 
        shall extend only to loss or damage in excess of the first 
        $500,000 of loss or damage to items covered.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 21.1

                      List of Subsidiaries and Affiliates

Wholly-owned subsidiaries

Microtune (LP), L.L.C.
Microtune (GP), L.L.C.

Indirectly-owned subsidiaries

Microtune (Texas), L.P.
HMTF Acquisition (Bermuda), Ltd.
Microtune GmbH & Co. KG
NSF Technologies (Phils.), Inc.
Microtune RF-Technologies (Phils.), Inc.
HMTF Erste Beteiligungs GmbH
Microtune Verwaltungs GmbH
Microtune (Hong Kong), Ltd.
Microtune (Korea), Ltd.
Microtune (Taiwan), Ltd.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                     Exhibit 6.1


                       KOWLOON-CANTON RAILWAY CORPORATION

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 Restated
                                                        ---------------------------------------------------------
                                                         1999      2000      2001      2002      2003      2003
                                                        -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
                                                          HK$       HK$       HK$       HK$       HK$       US$
                                                                           (except share data)
<S>                                                     <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
(1)  Weighted average number of ordinary shares......   289,950   311,200   377,867   391,200   391,200

HK GAAP
(2)  Profit after taxation (in millions).............     1,903     2,288     2,435     2,210     1,381
     Earnings per share - Basic (2)/(1)..............     6,563     7,352     6,444     5,649     3,530       455


US GAAP
(3)  Net Income (in millions)........................     3,150     4,113     3,792     2,951     1,512
     Earnings per share - Basic (3)/(1)..............    10,864    13,217    10,035     7,543     3,865       498
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Andrew D. Hyder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2004 of Subjex Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. The registrant's other certifying officers, and I, are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluations;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: January 19, 2006


By: /s/ Andrew D. Hyder

CEO, President, Acting CFO
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PetroChina Company Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jiang Jiemin, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jiang JieminName:

Jiang JieminTitle:

Chairman of Board of Directors
(performing the functions of Chief Executive Officer)


Date: April 26, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 705 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 705

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain table tennis tables.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2003

 Mr. Schrock introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain table tennis tables.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TABLE TENNIS TABLES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.95.06    Table tennis      Free              Free              No change         On or before 12/
                     tables                                                                  31/2006          ''
                     constructed of                                                                            .
                     particle board
                     encapsulated in
                     aluminum,
                     sealed by a
                     frame of square
                     aluminum tubing
                     and having a
                     bottom side
                     covered with a
                     stamped and
                     corrugated
                     piece of
                     aluminum
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     9506.40.00)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 35867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR09-27-000]


UGI Central Penn Gas, Inc.; Notice of Rate Election

July 13, 2009.
    Take notice that on July 7, 2009, UGI Central Penn Gas, Inc. (CPG) 
filed a Notice of Rate Election pursuant to section 284.123(b)(1)(ii) 
of the Commission's regulations. CPG proposes to utilize its presently 
effective Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission city-gate 
transportation rate under Rate Schedule GD for temporary transportation 
service for Corning Natural Gas Company pursuant to CPG's section 
284.224 certificate.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or 
before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant. Anyone 
filing an intervention or protest on or before the intervention or 
protest date need not serve motions to intervene or protests on persons 
other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0f6f5e2f3ffdedcd9ded5e3c5c0c0dfc2c4f0d6d5c2d39ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="11575443525e7f7d787f74426461617e636551777463723f767e67">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 20, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17236 Filed 7-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

CARE WELLNESS CENTER, LLC a/a/o VIRGINIA BARDON-DIAZ,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-2254

[February 16, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John D. Fry, Judge; L.T. Case No. CONO 14-7576 (70).

Nancy W. Gregoire of Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, Fort 

Lauderdale, and Scott E. Danner of Kirwan, Spellacy & Danner, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Marlene S. Reiss of Law Offices of Marlene S. Reiss, Esq., P.A., Miami,

and Thomas J. Wenzel of Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A., Coral Springs, for 

appellee.

Peter J. Valeta of Cozen O’Connor, Chicago, Illinois, for Amicus Curiae 

Florida Justice Reform Institute.

Matthew C. Scarfone of Colodny Fass, P.A., Sunrise, for Amicus Curiae 

Property Casualty Insurers Association of America.

Mac S. Phillips of Phillips|Tadros, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and David M. 

Caldevilla of de laParte & Gilbert, P.A., Tampa, for Amicus Curiae 

Floridians For Fair Insurance, Inc.

GROSS, J.

This case is before the court on remand from the Florida Supreme 

Court. We affirm the summary final judgment and remand to the county 

court for further proceedings consistent with Progressive Select Insurance 

Co. v. Florida Hospital Medical Center, 260 So. 3d 219 (Fla. 2018).

Affirmed.
2

FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
SCWC-13-0000002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. REED W. SAILOLA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000002; CASE NO. 1DTA-11-03671)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Reed W. Sailola’s application for writ of certiorari filed on August 29, 2015, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, September 30, 2015. Jonathan E. Burge for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000002 30-SEP-2015 01:12 PM
#### NC Venture I, L.P., Respondent, v Complete Analysis, Inc., Defendant, and Joseph E. Fiegoli et al., Appellants.

[851 NYS2d 888]

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the plaintiff was not required, pursuant to RFAFL 1301 (3), to obtain leave of court prior to commencing this action to recover on the promissory note. At the time this action was commenced, the plaintiffs action to foreclose the mortgage had been dismissed and no judgment in favor of the plaintiff was entered in that action.

*515This Court reversed the order dismissing the action to foreclose the mortgage, and the complaint in that action was reinstated *(see NC Venture I, L.P. v Complete Analysis, Inc.,*22 AD3d 540 [2005]). Allowing the plaintiff to pursue this action on the note is not inconsistent with the purpose of RPAPL 1301 (3), which is to protect the mortgagor from inappropriate, duplicative litigation to recover the same debt *(see Central Trust Co. v Dann,*85 NY2d 767, 772 [1995]). The property which was the subject of the mortgage foreclosure action has been sold at a tax sale *(see Lehman v Roseanne Invs. Corp.,*106 AD2d 617, 618 [1984]).

The plaintiff met its initial burden of establishing its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment in this action to recover on the promissory note and the appellants failed to meet their burden of coming forward with evidentiary proof demonstrating the existence of a triable issue of fact *(see European Am. Bank v Syosset Autorama,*204 AD2d 266 [1994]). Rivera, J.P., Lifson, Angiolillo and Balkin, JJ., concur.